Speaker 1: Welcome to the Three Stories version of the Todd Herman Shows.
Story number one petulant children or Statesmen and public Servants,
Story number two Breaking schools, discover fish need water, And
story number three a sample of Elka Lutheran theology, such
as it is. We'll talk about this with the help
of Renewed Healthcare and our free live webinar we're doing
September eleventh. Go to joined stem cell talks dot com,
submit your questions, be at the wlive webinar and you
will be entered to win a free weeks stay in
Ubervararta beautiful Hotel. I'd been there twice, no three times
now actually, And we'll get started with the help I've
got almighty.
Speaker 2: The Todd Herman Show is one hundred percent disapproved by
big pharma technocrats and tyrants everywhere from the high mountains
of Free American Here's the the Emerald City, Todd to Herman.
Speaker 1: Today is the day the Lord has made, and these
are the times to which God has decided we shall live.
You can ask yourself a question, and you can really
apply it across the board of world leadership, even local leadership.
You can go from school boards and park boards all
the way up to state senates, into state houses, to governors.
You can go to the top of the tip of
the top and you can ask a question, are we
dealing with petulant children or are we dealing with statesmen
and public servants? And I don't know that it's necessarily
that hard to look at this and say, there's a
lot of petulant children running things? Are they any of them?
Do they have any signs of being a public servant?
In Washington, d C. President Trump is being, of course
a what's the phrase, what's it again?
Speaker 2: It's what?
Speaker 1: Oh, sorry, literal hitler, because he has federalized the Washington
DC police force. Because that's extreme, it is utterly It's
never been done other than the two hundred and ten
days of Biden's first term where the city was on
virtual lockdown with National Guard members guarding everything and checkpoints
and fences all around. Other than that, you know, that's
this has never been done other than the other times
it's been done. And what President Trump is doing is
of course very bizarre and very extreme because he is
having police officers who are told to enforce the law
go ingenforce the law. That's troubling. It's not troubling to
have allowed crime to run rampant, or to have had
a DC police commander falsifying apparently falsifying crime statistics. Now
he's been arrested for that, and the union backs up
police officers. The police officers, you need to said, yeah,
they're doing this, this is a habit of them. So
are we dealing with petulant children or statesmen and public servants?
A reporter asked, and this is an unfair question. You
have to admit, this is deeply unfair because it's very technical.
So reporter with a deep knowledge of military command structures
and police command structures, he asked a He asked a
the police chief in DC asked her a question. Her
name is Pamela Smith, and he asked her a question
about well, it's just a very technical term. And I
know that's going to come up.
Speaker 3: Is what the shame of command is?
Speaker 4: Now?
Speaker 1: What does that mean?
Speaker 5: Well, is it pam Bondi's greeks of amager.
Speaker 1: You or how does this work?
Speaker 3: So at the executive order is clear, the President has
requested MPD services in our Home Rule Charter outlines the process.
The President designated Attorney General Bondi as his proxy.
Speaker 1: We need to watch the services for me. Because the
police chief begins to answer the question and then a
lawyer type steps up, like the question was do you
know what the chain of command is? Now? And the
DC police chief pameloss missus, what does that mean? If
you've ever watched if you've ever watched an episode of mash,
you've seen the chain of command. If you've ever watched
a police show, you've heard a reference to the chain
of command. The people who are being put in charge
of us are people who don't even have a light
dusting of cultural understanding of the culture of law enforcement,
which relies upon shaine of command. And in fact, it
used to be the case that lot of cops had
served in the military or in fact been cops. So
let's just watch this again. Here, what the shame of
command is?
Speaker 6: Now?
Speaker 1: What does that mean? Well? Is it?
Speaker 4: Pam Boondi speaking of.
Speaker 1: American I mean, give the lady in the yellow jackets
some credits she recognizes. What does that mean? So ask yourself,
petulant childs or a statesperson and public servant, statesman Eric Solwell.
Eric Solwell who tried to or maybe even did get
to have sexual relations with a Chinese spy that Eric Solwell,
who the other day posted a video that he was
he was bragging about he could be doing legislation, but
instead he was he was repping. He was benching baby
bention in one thirty five. Just like my niece who's sixteen,
can bench one thirty five big time, Eric Solwell, he
wrote on Twitter, which is a white supremacist platform run
by a white supremacist. Guide to Elon Musk, Eric Solwell,
Trump's federal takeover of DC's in safety, it's about distracting
Americans from comma high prices, a bad jobs report, a
folding economy in the Epstein files. Interesting because way back
in the day, Eric Salwell had posted this on Twitter,
which is a platform owned by an apparent white supremacist. Well,
that's what we're told, that's what the muckenberg he says. Wait,
they've stopped saying that since he and Trump got into
a fight. That's weird. All of a sudden, Elon's a
good guy again. Solwell wrote this. My wife and I
play these scenarios over in our head all the time.
We've practiced going out through the back seat to you
your kids out of our car for carjacked. This is
not normal, soft unviolent crime. Prosecutors are letting too many
dangerous people threaten our kids. And a conservative journalist, Peter
Hassen pointed out, this is an interesting take from a
guy who had to practice getting carjacked. And he went
and found that tweet and Eric Solwell public servants statesmen
or petulant child? Which way does the scale go for you?
To me? It's all petulant child. Now, how is this
playing out in public? And does it in fact cross borders?
Is it just a United States phenomena? It's not. It
crosses borders. How's it playing out in public? I'll show
you from the screens at CNN how this is playing
out in public in just a second. Because images are
very very powerful things. Angel Studios knows this. They know
that images are very potent things, and that storytelling is
often how Jesus Christ spread spread his word. They're out
with the new series called Testament, and what they've done
is they've taken the happenings in the Book of Acts.
And that's where Luke went back and investigated and learned
about how the Apostles built the church that Jesus told
them to build. That's the Book of Acts. What did
they do? They've transplanted those happenings into a world where
there's a technical surveillance state, high tech surveillance censorship states,
and where people hate the truth. Does that sound familiar?
You can stream Testament right now. By becoming a Premium
Angel Studio Guild member, go to Angel dot com slash
todd You can stream Testament. You will also get two
free tickets to all their theatrical releases. You get to
vote on the stories that they tell and distribute and
with which they change culture stories like they've done before
Sound of Freedom, King of Kings, and now the series
Testament goes. Stream it right now at Angel dot com
slash Todd. So, CNN, this guy on CNA, I don't
know how long he can keep his job because he
keeps bringing news out that people in CNN must hate.
And this has to do with President Trump's handling a
crime versus that of figurehead Biden or the Democrats. It
just sort of.
Speaker 6: Gives the game away here because Donald Trump is like
Airic Jordan, towering over Joe Biden when it comes to
their handling a crime. Look in twenty twenty four, look
at where Biden's net approval was on crime way under
water there at minus twenty six points. It was one
of Biden's wars issues. Granted, pretty much every issue was
one of Biden's warst issues. And again look at where
Donald Trump is way, way way above Joe Biden.
Speaker 2: What is that?
Speaker 6: That's twenty seven points. So Americans vastly prefer Donald Trump's
approach to crime than they dit to Joe Biden's. And again,
I think it gets back to the point that Americans
are far more hawkish on crime than a lot of
Democrats want to it.
Speaker 1: Make what approach to crime? What was Biden's approach to crime?
His approach to crime was to fly cartel members and
their soldiers into a country using a CPB one app
to allow them to set up shop and supply chains
into American cities, knowing that they are coddled in separate
countries like Seattle and Los Angeles and San Francisco and
Minneapolis and New York and the list goes on. He
didn't have an approach to crime other than he wanted
more of it. Sometimes he did have enough crimes, so
he needed to invent crimes. The president's approach to This
is popular everywhere, but in the minds of people who
think that the previous administration was the reasonable administration. Remember,
it was Joe Biden who partnered with Baracuscain and Obama
to allow the Taliban to partner with Mexico based drug
cartels to bring heroin into our country. They stopped indictments.
That is an approach to crime, and that approach was
to allowed to happen. So petulant children or statesmen. Let's
look up north in Canada. So in Canada, there's been
these wild fires. I live in an area of the
country north Idaho where we get wildfires, and there's something
you need to be serious about. But one of the
things we don't do here is go out to become
petulant children or little handmaids telling people what they can
do and not do. In Canada, they're doing just that.
They have admitted that walking around in the woods doesn't
cause forest fires, but they are still going to find
people for walking around in the woods.
Speaker 7: Going for a walk in the woods is going to
cause a fire. I can understand why people think that
that's ridiculous, but the reality is it's not that you
might cause a fire. It's that if you're out there
walking in the woods and you break your leg, we're
not going to come and get you because we have
emergency responders that are out focused on a fire that
is threatening the lives of New Brunswickers. And if you
take your boat out fishing in a pond and crown
Land and you capsize, we're not going to be able
to come and help you out because our first responders
are focused on an immediate and serious threat to our province.
And so it's the possibility of diverting emergency resources away
from where they are really needed.
Speaker 1: That is Susan Holt, who is the Premiere of New Brunswick.
So we're not going to do that. We're not going
to let you walk around. And what they could have
just said is, hey, by the way, if you go
walking in the woods, we're not coming to get you.
If you break your leg, you're on your own. If
you break down in the woods, handle its, we're not
going to come and get you. They could have that
message go out and guess what a lot of seeing
people would say, I'm not going in. Other people would say,
you know, I've been hiking in the woods my whole life.
I'm not afraid of breaking a leg. It hasn't happen
be force, so I gonna have again. If it does,
I'll take care of it. Jeff Everley is a Canadian
military veteran and he decided to go out and test
the fine they were gonna levy on Canadians. He thought
it was about twenty five thousand dollars for hiking in
the woods, so he did go test.
Speaker 8: This is the Department of Natural Resources where the conservation
officers work, who issue twenty five thousand dollars fines for
going in the woods.
Speaker 1: But back here, this is the woods.
Speaker 5: So I have a couple of conservation officers with me
right now who are not on camera, but have advised
me that if I go into the woods, if I
defy their orders to go into the woods, then I
will be fined. And they also said that they would
double my fine to fifty thousand dollars. So I'm gonna
walk down here and go into these woods and they
have me on.
Speaker 9: Camera forced BacT twenty five. So one fine is twenty
eighth and seventy two fifty.
Speaker 8: Okay, I thought it was twenty five thousand, it's twenty eight.
Speaker 4: Victim piece.
Speaker 1: Oh, victim victim piece. Thanks very much, Bund you're victims.
Speaker 8: I appreciate your courteous approach.
Speaker 1: He made it very very easy on them. God bless
him for being so courteous. And he wants to test
this in courts. Petulant children or statesmen. Oh by the way,
also out of Saskatchewan, out of Canada, not New Brunswick,
but Saskatchewan, a firefighter went out to set fires. He
decided to go light fires, often using hey bails. He
set about thirty of them in a month. What's happened
to him? A fine? No, No, well, he's going to
get community service for two hundred hours. He could have
been fined seventy six thousand, five hundred box or seventy
six thousand, six hundred and fifty bucks, but no, they're
just going to put them on a community service for
two hundred hours. Petulant children or statesmen. It is happening
across the world, and I'm leaning towards one hundred percent
petulant children. Story number two, there is a breaking news
coming out as schools, and this is that school districts
have suddenly discovered that fish need water, and people need air,
and we all need gravity. They're going back and discovering
things that should have been clear to everybody who's ever
been around kids, and God blessed some school teachers for
speaking up about this. There is a structure to our minds.
There's a structure to when we're able to learn languages
and retain languages. There's a structure to our mind where
we're most adept at memorizing things and repeating things. The
human mind changes at a point and we're able to
reason and employ logic and make arguments. There's a time
in the development of our mind where most adept at
understanding numbers and figures in geometry, and then there's a
time where these all gel and we're able to take
this information and aggregate it and use it to write
advanced papers, et cetera. God has planned our minds around
gestational growth. And it used to be the time when
people who taught understood that a certain point all kids
need is memorization. They need to be able to memorize,
let's say, passages from the Bible. God's word is always
good for teaching, review, concrrection, and it's a great way
to learn God's Word at the same time as you're
learning to read and to memorize. You're exercising that part
of your mind. When people expand beyond that, then they
can take the information they've read and begin to repeat
it back. That's another stage of growth. There's an approach
called the trivium, which is a classical Latin form of education,
and it follows in this path. Kids who go through
this end up being being able to retain information and
make better decisions and how to present it. Back in
the day, we used to teach people Latin. The reason
we did that is because English is a Latin based language,
as His, Spanish and many others. When you learned the
Latin roots for things, you can figure out what a
word means, even a complex medical word, because you can
go back to the Latin root. What do these Latin
roots mean? When school was changed to creates, not people
who learned how to think, but people who learned how
to work in factories to go be worker bees, they
began to change the approach to school. Memorization was still important,
but it sort of ended there. How much of your
school life was about memorization all the way up into
high school. Think about the tests you had. What year
did this war happen, what year did it end, what
was the name of this president at this time? How
much of that was memorization. And unless you were in
a trivium based or a private school, you probably never
got to the point where you're really taught rhetoric. We
ever taught how to make an artful argument. We ever
taught the rules of threes and fives in making a
rhetorical presentation to someone, that the minds of people tend
to take information up better in rules of three fives,
and if you must sevens. This has to go with
bullet points and how you present information. We ever taught that,
We ever taught how to use socratic inquiry in order
to draw out from people what they know but they
don't want to think they know. These were tools that
people who were taught to think had, And suddenly we're
seeing now schools beginning to discover that fish need water.
In other words, there are things people need for education
to be fruitful, or rather, in this case, things they
don't need. I'll share something a teacher said in terms
of things kids don't need, which is really fish need water.
In just a second, we all need to clean our
bodies unless we want to be disgusting, smelling, stinking banana
peel love and hippies. So we use Alan soaps at
this program, which is made in America. It's all natural.
It's made by a family with three generations of soap
making expertise. More important than that, it employs people who
the rest of the world will not employ. Allan is
the chief soap officer there. He's thirteen, he's been through
about eighteen operations and he is effectively nonverbal because of autism.
His brother Ian works there now, also affected by autism.
Now that's all good news that we employ them. Here's
the bad news. The patriarch of that family, John has
terminal cancer. He just made his last airplane flight to
see his mom, and he's asked me to share this
with you. It's okay. I'm asking you to try the soap,
and if you love it, to subscribe, so that in
John goes to the Lord Jesus and his wife takes
over the company, it will be easy for her to run.
Please try the soap and only continue to buy it
if you love it. But if you love it, subscribe
Alan soaps dot com slash Todd that's Alan Soaps dot
com slash Todd, a teacher, decided to describe what happens
when you have a phone ban in schools.
Speaker 10: School my state ban the phones, ban the phones. Today
all of my students, one hundred percent of them, took
notes in my class, did their assignment, asked for help
when they got stuck, and turned it in, and then
when they were done, they talked to each other.
Speaker 1: It this easy the whole time.
Speaker 2: Have have.
Speaker 10: I have been pulling my hair out for like eight years?
Has it been this easy of a solution the whole time?
Speaker 1: Yes, the ENTRT Yes, I mean this isn't going to
be the complete solution. But when you take something out
of someone's hands that has become an idol, that has
become their emotional connection to the world, that has become
their painkiller, that has become their porn connection, that has
become their friend connection, it has become their fake front connection,
their handicap. Yes, when you take that away and to
return kids to a natural environment of learning, it really
is that easy. Fish deeed water and kids need schooling,
and they also need schooling that respects their minds. And
praise God that we're beginning to see some common sense
actions in the school praise God for that story. Number three,
I want to provide you a sample of the theology
of the Elka flavor of the Lutheran Church. They've had
a series of meetings over the past many years and
got very serious about it this past year, trying to
justify their support for same sex marriage. And the writing
that I've read that I've read a series of these
is fascinating in that it barely barely mentions a certain book.
It barely mentions the Bible. And what I'm seeing is
a series of philosophers and theologians quoting each other as
philosophers and theologians. I want to give you a sample
of this, but I also want to show you where
this leads. When you depart the clear teachings of the
Word of God, all of a sudden, everything is allowed.
I want to give you some samples of this how
everything is allowed from a guy we've had on the
program before courtesy of Protest You. He dressed up as
what a Star Wars character last time. This time he's
determined that Jesus Christ is very very, very very queer. Yeah,
it's a slippery slope arguments. I once had a liberal
friend of mine say that slippery slopes don't exist. He said,
if slippery slopes existed, we all be standing over sideways. Well,
guess what we are. This is a piece in a
series justifying the same sex union and marriage position of
the Elka Lutheran Church. It's written by guy you know
as a very serious thinker because he calls himself H.
Frederick Rees, Junior doctor H. Frederick Reees a generous Orthodoxy
the Elka's choice on sexuality and opportunity for generous Orthodoxy
generous orthodoxy. This would mean that God's plan for the
world is not generous. God's offer of free salvation is
not generous, that God, who sets some limits on what
he'll accept in terms of human sexual behavior, is not generous.
And it begins like this. The Elka social statement Human Sexuality,
Gift and Trust was written through an extended process of
seeking responses and suggestions. Its conclusion should not be dismissed
as being hasty. I hope that many of us will
counter persons who are saying that this whole process was
a sham engineered from quote above a Chicago and the
result of a predictable conspiracy of church liberals. I've heard
all those charges and reject them. Oh you reject them? Okay,
I don't. It's been clear for a number of years.
In fact, see my daughter is yeah, she's that old.
It's been clear for about eighteen years that you intended
to take this position, and it came from on high.
Although I'm not wholly satisfied with the current text of
human sexuality, Gift and Trust, for the most part, I
think it's a viable statement. Are you noticing a trend here?
I think? I think, I think. I think our pastors
and lady can use a statement of theological wisdom and
practical pastoral guidance on the many issues surrounding sexuality and expressions.
The statement is useful sections for counseling and teaching. I
hope that pastors and lady will make use of its
proportion of its portions in their ministries and communities. I
believe our community will be weakened in mission if we
continue to spend a great deal of time and energy
rehashing the two thousand and nine Assembly actions, even seeking
to rescind them. The next paragraph begins with I think,
and then that sentence next is I know the man
is quoting himself and he's referring to theological wisdom. What
does the Bible say about wisdom? The beginning of wisdom
is fear of the Lord. You would need to go
through page one, which is full of paragraphs, page two,
which is full of paragraphs, and we get down to hear, Oh,
this is important. My experience with commitment to homosexual Christians
his experience. There's a whole lot of eye statements in this.
I believe the writers may intend to very deep. You'd
have to go to page three of six and in
that case, down to the middle of page three of
six where you get this the biblical witness. A few
biblical texts condemn certain types of homosexual activity, and he
quotes Genesis two eighteen to twenty four, nineteen one through thirty, Levitigus.
He quotes Romans, Corinthians, timpathy. The question is whether this
condemnation extends to all forms of homosexuality and same gender sex. No,
that's not the question. No, the question is this, what
did Jesus say? That's the question. What Jesus Christ said
is that a man leaves his mother and father and
clings to his wife, and they become one flesh. The
same Jesus said you've heard it said you shall not
commit adultery. But I tell you, look, a man who looks,
he said, a woman with lost in his eyes has
already committed adultery. Jesus raised the bar for sexual conduct.
He recognized that sin begins in the mind, that thinking
of sin is sinning. He never came back to say, hey,
you know the whole thing about same sex unions and
so called marriage, which was unthought of at that time,
unthought of that you would have same sex marriage. Even
in Roman culture, it was unthought of. And he was
never went back and said, hey, we got this wrong.
Because he's God almighty, wasn't is God almighty? Jesus did
change some things. He made it very clear to the
Pharisees that it's not what goes in the mouth, but
what comes out of the mouth that defiles you. It's
not the food you eat. And the apostles said, hey,
explain this to us. And actually one of those times
where Jesus not his patience. He couldn't lose his patience,
but he spoke firmly to them, saying, are you really
this dim What you eat is digested by the body
and eliminated, but what you speak goes into the world
and can cause harm and lies to others. So it's
what comes out of the mouth that defiles, not what
goes in. He was changing the approach. The Pharisees had
the dietary law, and he did it specifically and overtly.
He never did that with sexuality. Never. So the question
is not whether these passages condemn a certain form of
homosexual contact or even same sex contact. The question is
what does Jesus say. What I'm truly bothered by, and
much of this writing is that I think, I want,
I hope, I think, I say, I don't care what
you say. Show me scripture. If you can show me
scripture that shows that Jesus Christ is okay with same
sex marriage, I'll celebrate, because then one of the toughest
issues I've faced personally, because it's harmed people I know,
it's well, it's harm relationships, it's harm my relationships, it's
stolen from me, the relationships with people I love, and
I may never get them back. I would celebrate, but
it's not there. It's not there. When elka An organizations
like this a race Jesus. Then they also opened the
door to people who, having seen Jesus a race come
and withdraw him as something he's not. I'll show you
the latest example of this with a pastor who has
reasoned out why Jesus was a very very queer man,
a soul called pastor or as our friends at protest
you say, an impastor, and being an impastor is a
dangerous and bad business. If you're a business person, small,
medium size, even a large business that's fairly sophisticated, you're
probably counting on having a firewall between you and you
and your business assets. So, for instance, if God forbid,
one of your employees was grievously injured and it went
past ELLENI and they came at you to sue you,
or as insurance company came to sue you. We want
our money back, we're paying for this guy's surgeries, etc.
We're coming after you. That happens, you may be thinking, yeah,
they can do that, but they have to sue my company,
and my company's got insurance. Not necessarily, if you had
an employee really really injured in the insurance company wanted money,
you know what they do. They'd go find out how
your company is structured. They'd go and investigate and what
they'd probably find out is you do not have corporate credit.
Therefore your company is you and they'd know they could
get at your retirement accounts and then they'd come at you.
You can help find out right now if you actually
have corporate credit, in other words, do you have that
former firewall, and you can do it for free in
a no obligation discussion with my friends at bisible that's
gobisible dot com with a Z. Brian and his team
will do what the insurance companies would do. They're gonna
look at your corporate filings, they're gonna look at your
bank accounts. They're gonna come out and they're gonna tell
you whether you have corporate credit or not. Here's the
great news. If you don't have it, they'll solve that
for you in seven easy steps. Their website is gobisible
dot com. That's gobisible dot com. This is a fake teacher,
a false teacher pretending that he thinks he believes he
has determined that Jesus Christ is very, very queer.
Speaker 4: How queer was Jesus? He was an observant Jew, but
he was thirty years old, no wife, no job, hung
out with twelve other dudes. That's pretty queer queering. The
Bible takes Jesus and other outsiders and religiously stigmatized folks
in the past and juxtaposes them with contemporary queer folks
and Christians.
Speaker 1: Yeah, when you're crying the Bible and you're trying to
make Jesus something he's not, that's exactly what you do. Incidentally,
have you ever heard of a monk? I hear tell them.
There's these people called monks, and they're men who live
among other men, and they're not all same sex attracted.
In fact, most of them aren't. In fact, back in
that day, there was a guy named Well. He wore
camel skin and he ate a honey and locusts John
the Baptist. There were plenty of rabbis who toured I'm
tought and we're not married. Jesus wasn't alone in this.
That doesn't make him queer. It made him a rabbi,
married to his work, and he was the model of
not sinning. If you're saying he was queer, you're probably saying, well,
therefore he went out and acted on that, because Jesus
has already said that thinking of a woman, and you
could extend that easily enough to a man, and you
think of them sexually with lust in your eyes and
your mind, then you've committed adultery. What we know is
that Jesus committed no sin. Why because the Bible says
he committed no sin. He who had no sin became
sin on our behalf. So yeah, you can go out
and queer anything. You can queer a lemon, stand if
you want.
Speaker 4: Realizing that despite our past cultural differences, sexual and gender differences,
that we share similar histories of out of placeness or
vilified sexualities and gender diversities. Jesus kingdom practice is queer
in the sense it questions identities and blurs distinctions.
Speaker 1: Jesus' mission, his ministry, his kingdom is queer. The Apostle
Paul made it very very clear, and it's a hard
teaching for people who love the same sex attracted. He
said that people who practice homosexuality, like pre people who
practice theeving, like people who practice adultery, have no place
in the kingdom of heaven. Practice not having committed an
act for which they repented and stopped sinning. Jesus always said,
go and sin no more, but his kingdom, his kingdom
is queer because he's questioning identities. He didn't question his identity.
Who knew who he was? He didn't question our identity.
Who knows who we are? None of this, none of
this can be compared biblically.
Speaker 4: Luke presents Jesus as leaving the patriarchal household and challenging
both cultural hierarchies in his egalitarian meals, transgressing gender roles
and radical inclusion of outsiders.
Speaker 1: Radical inclusion of people. He created. And he was questioning
not the authorities, because he was and is the authorities.
He is the authority. He is the way, the truth
in the life. Authority doesn't question authority. God is the
pre eminent authority. What Jesus did was confirmed authority. He
was who he said he was, and he proved himself
to be who he said he was in signs and
wonders and miracles and conquering death. Only God himself could
conquer death. Jesus did it, he predicted he'd do it.
He did it in front of people. He reappeared to people,
five hundred at a time. He send it into heaven
and left behind a gift only God could leave behind
the Holy Spirit. He was a teacher extraordinaire. He was
God Almighty, and there was nothing about him that was queer.
And the erasing of Jesus by the Elka Lutheran Church
opens the door for the redrawing of Jesus by people
like that. This is the todd hermansheaw. Please go be well,
be strong, be kind, Please make every effort to walk
in the light of Christ and celebrate for me as
I get to go hang out with my beloved wife,