Speaker 1: Good evening and welcome everybody to another amazing edition of
Speaker 1: The Cajun Night Live. I am your host, the Cajun Knight,
Speaker 1: Jacob Mook. And for anybody who like to see what
Speaker 1: Sam is doing, you want to be a part of
Speaker 1: the retinue every Wednesday night on the Cajun Night, then
Speaker 1: go to the link in the description to the Cajun
Speaker 1: Night on Patreon dot com. Without further ado, let's get
Speaker 1: into it. We got some things we're gonna discuss this evening.
Speaker 1: Some of it's gonna be political, some of it's gonna
Speaker 1: be technological. But before we talk about that, before we
Speaker 1: talk about what's going on with Trump. Apparently we are
Speaker 1: going to war with Venezuela. Apparently we are not going
Speaker 1: to war with Venezuela. Apparently half of Congress is apting
Speaker 1: for early retirement right now. Ever, since Marjorie Taylor Green
Speaker 1: took off, and it's not just Republicans, Democrats too, I
Speaker 1: got my own theory as.
Speaker 2: To why that might be.
Speaker 1: Before we talk about any of this, and especially I
Speaker 1: wanted to bring this up early because I know Tony
Speaker 1: being our resident Russian, I don't want to say expert,
Speaker 1: but you're definitely more well read onto the situation in
Speaker 1: Europe and Russia than most people I know. I wanted
Speaker 1: to get your take on this one, so let's read
Speaker 1: into it here, Live science or Live science, Not sure,
Speaker 1: I do believe it's Live science. Russia accidentally destroys its
Speaker 1: only working launch pad as astronauts lift off to ISS.
Speaker 2: Now, I'm not taking.
Speaker 1: This opportunity to poke fun or make jokes because I
Speaker 1: honestly don't know the whole situation.
Speaker 2: I don't know if it was a freak accident. You know.
Speaker 1: The where I heard this from was somebody who was
Speaker 1: basically just you know, dunking on Russia, saying that they
Speaker 1: couldn't build anything, and this, this and this, and it's like, dude,
Speaker 1: we in America have had some incidents take place as
Speaker 1: far as launching goes and testing goes and whatever else.
Speaker 1: So I'm not that's not the spirit that I want
Speaker 1: to bring in on this particular conversation, but I do
Speaker 1: think it's interesting enough that we do need to talk
Speaker 1: about it here. So let's read in the recent launch
Speaker 1: of a Suyos rocket carrying three astronauts to the International
Speaker 1: Space Station has caused significant damage to Russia's only pad
Speaker 1: capable of sending humans into space. Russia's only working launch
Speaker 1: pad has been temporary knocked out of action after sustaining
Speaker 1: significant damage during the recent launch of three astronauts to
Speaker 1: the International Space Station. This leaves the country unable to
Speaker 1: send humans to space for the first time in more
Speaker 1: than sixty years, experts say. On Thanksgiving, the Suyas MS
Speaker 1: twenty eight spacecraft lifted off from Site thirty one to
Speaker 1: six at the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan, Kazakhstan, where Boar
Speaker 1: heads from I'm not mistaken, at.
Speaker 2: Around two thirty pm local time.
Speaker 1: The rocket was carrying Russian cosmonauts Sergei could Severtkov and
Speaker 1: Sergei mckev, alongside NASA astronaut astronaut Chris Williams. Yes, there
Speaker 1: was an American on this rocket. I'm just gonna throw
Speaker 1: this out. And also, as much as people like to
Speaker 1: throw shade one way or another here, there has been
Speaker 1: more than a few times that even and I know,
Speaker 1: I'm America and Russia.
Speaker 2: Are not at war right now, I understand that. But
Speaker 2: even during the Cold War, yes, there was a big
Speaker 2: space race going on.
Speaker 1: There was more communications between these countries as far as
Speaker 1: space travel and space exploration goes than what people initially
Speaker 1: want to acknowledge and admit. So even though there's this
Speaker 1: big kerfuffle going on with the Ukraine and Russia situation,
Speaker 1: I know we've been keeping up with it pretty regularly here. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Russia and America are still working together as far as
Speaker 1: space exploration goes, especially when it comes to the ISS.
Speaker 1: So we had one American and two Russians on this
Speaker 1: craft who all successfully arrived on the ISS, where they
Speaker 1: will remain for the next eight months Live Science, as
Speaker 1: sister site space dot com reported. However, shortly after the launch,
Speaker 1: Russia's space agency ross Cosmos ross Cosmos sure revealed that
Speaker 1: something had happened during to the launchpad during the rocket takeoff.
Speaker 1: The launch pad was inspected and is done every time
Speaker 1: a rocket is launched. It always is, Centers wrote in
Speaker 1: a translated statement on Telegram. Damage to several launch pad
Speaker 1: components was identified, So apparently the launch pad is out
Speaker 1: of commission, but the launch was still successfully done. I
Speaker 1: don't know how soon this will be able to get repaired.
Speaker 1: I don't know to what extent the damage is done,
Speaker 1: but I do think that. It's a fascinating turn of
Speaker 1: events in the whole situation. Sam, go ahead, sir.
Speaker 3: Isn't this shortly after they already just got three astronauts
Speaker 3: out of space, and then then after three up there stranded.
Speaker 4: That was China, the Taito Potato.
Speaker 1: So so China has a satellite out there floating in space,
Speaker 1: as as most countries do that are you know, decent
Speaker 1: and uh, basically, they had three astronauts out there that
Speaker 1: they didn't know how they were going to get them home.
Speaker 1: And their response to this was to send a rocket
Speaker 1: up with three other astronauts and basic do a hot
Speaker 1: swap and then let the three that had been stranded
Speaker 1: to come home and strand the other the new three
Speaker 1: out there.
Speaker 2: Personally, I don't know why they just didn't bring.
Speaker 1: Like a six seater rocket up and get everybody out
Speaker 1: of there.
Speaker 2: I don't know, But yeah, that's that's something that China
Speaker 2: just did.
Speaker 1: Now the ISS, like I said, the three individuals did
Speaker 1: successfully make it there. They're all good, and the craft
Speaker 1: that they took to get up there is not damaged
Speaker 1: or anything either.
Speaker 2: The launch pad in Kazakhstan was damaged.
Speaker 3: But yeah, also you would think be in China, they'd
Speaker 3: be able to die.
Speaker 4: And I say this, I can say it.
Speaker 3: Oh, you would think they like Rubert's cubed them up,
Speaker 3: like pack them in like Saldaine.
Speaker 4: Since they do it everywhere else in China.
Speaker 1: I mean, who's to say they didn't, you know? But
Speaker 1: he means it get them back down?
Speaker 4: You mean, yeah, why didn't they just stand with the men?
Speaker 1: Well, it's not the same, right, every out, every bram
Speaker 1: has to be acknowledged and account of for when you're
Speaker 1: talking about space and thrust and.
Speaker 2: Entry speeds and everything else.
Speaker 1: Like the level of ridiculous autistic engineering that has to
Speaker 1: go into every minute detail.
Speaker 2: Of it matters.
Speaker 1: So even though these people probably weighed a grand total
Speaker 1: of like one ninety five all three of them put together,
Speaker 1: I don't that would have been more than enough to
Speaker 1: throw things off, so they couldn't account for it.
Speaker 3: But anyway, Agent, I understand, I'm fashion math myself, but
Speaker 3: they're like full blooded Chinese.
Speaker 4: Shouldn't they be good with the math?
Speaker 2: They are? They are, That's that's the thing, man. But
Speaker 2: I don't know, I don't know.
Speaker 1: Hopefully they figure it out or figure out a way
Speaker 1: to get those three unstranded. But Tony, I don't know
Speaker 1: what you've heard on your end as far as the
Speaker 1: Russian accidentally destroying its launch pad was your whati have
Speaker 1: you heard on your end?
Speaker 5: No, I had not heard of this until you brought
Speaker 5: it up, so thank you for that. But yeah, they've
Speaker 5: been doing the lunches from Kazakhstan for a long time.
Speaker 5: I think it's because it's a little closer to the
Speaker 5: equator so they get more of a boost, yeah, by
Speaker 5: the rotation of the round Earth. Yeah, so yeah, I
Speaker 5: am aware they've been doing that for a while. I
Speaker 5: didn't know they only had one launch pad though.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Same, I didn't know that either.
Speaker 1: And I mean Kazakhstan it's not a part of Russia
Speaker 1: right now, but they still are very very close ties
Speaker 1: with them and all these things.
Speaker 5: But I have never part of the Soviet Union.
Speaker 1: Right, Yeah, they're one of the stands. And I had
Speaker 1: no idea this is their only launch pad, especially with
Speaker 1: the Russian space program being what it once was, had
Speaker 1: no idea that was all all of it was based
Speaker 1: out of Kazakhstan. But you know, the more you know,
Speaker 1: I don't know. Now With that being said, with the
Speaker 1: war going on in the direction that it is going.
Speaker 1: Do you think that this pad will get repaired relatively
Speaker 1: quickly or are they allocating their resources more to, you know,
Speaker 1: more pressing matters.
Speaker 2: Where's your take?
Speaker 5: I bet that it will get repaired quickly. I don't
Speaker 5: see it as being too competitive with the war effort,
Speaker 5: which is wrapping up. In my opinion, I remember predicting
Speaker 5: it would be by March twenty twenty six, and yeah,
Speaker 5: I was just pulling that out of fitin air kind of.
Speaker 5: But it looks like it's it may be coming to
Speaker 5: an end soon, and I really hope so I give
Speaker 5: it a fifty percent chance of ending within a month.
Speaker 1: More and more it's looking like at both sides are
Speaker 1: kind of willing to come to the negotiating tables. However,
Speaker 1: we've said that before, and then Zelenski would throw some
Speaker 1: wild shit out there, or or Putin would say no,
Speaker 1: I'm we're not stopping until this point, or whatever the case.
Speaker 2: I'm with you.
Speaker 1: I'm hoping that cooler heads will prevail here and everybody
Speaker 1: can go back and just do their thing. But yeah,
Speaker 1: it's sounding more and more like a realistic possibility as
Speaker 1: of this time, especially because allegedly there are nuclear weapons
Speaker 1: in Belarus.
Speaker 2: Tony, have you heard of this? Nope?
Speaker 5: Sorry, I had not heard of that either.
Speaker 1: Now I will say this article makes it super speculative.
Speaker 1: Nothing is confirmed. The onset the title of this was
Speaker 1: very misleading. But this is from the this is from
Speaker 1: I CAN. Basically, it's a website that just watches human
Speaker 1: rights things from around the world, and this particular thing,
Speaker 1: it's talking about the nuclear weapons that possibly are in Belarus.
Speaker 1: Now they go into a long history of the situation.
Speaker 1: They start off in July of nineteen ninety three. We
Speaker 1: are not doing that.
Speaker 2: We're gonna go.
Speaker 1: On and jump down to the bottom to the things
Speaker 1: that are more pertinent to us right now. So in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four, Russian arms and ammunition were delivered from
Speaker 1: Russia to Belarus for about nine months. One of the
Speaker 1: destinations was again the same Prudoque station, which is the
Speaker 1: vit Vivitibis yep. I don't there's too many consonants. Branch
Speaker 1: of the Belarusian Railway NOD six, which has a branch
Speaker 1: to the access roads of Military Unit nine four zero
Speaker 1: one seven of the rb Ministry of Defense, the two
Speaker 1: hundred and the two thousand, six hundred and thirty first
Speaker 1: air base for storage of missiles, weapons and ammunition. That's crazy, Like,
Speaker 1: you know, in military terms in America, you hear about
Speaker 1: the one hundred and first, You hear about the three
Speaker 1: seventy fifth and things like that. The twenty six hundred
Speaker 1: and thirty first air base, like that's that's a bit insane.
Speaker 1: Just just name it after a dead general, you know something. Anyway,
Speaker 1: According to railway officials, in June to August of twenty
Speaker 1: twenty four, a total of forty nine wagons were delivered
Speaker 1: by railway to the above mentioned aviation arsenal, of which
Speaker 1: six covered wagons were intended for the passage of persons
Speaker 1: accompanying the cargo, and respectively five covered wagons and sixty
Speaker 1: nine sixty eight gondola cars of the cargo, of which
Speaker 1: corresponded with the first class of danger explosive materials. The
Speaker 1: estimated weight of the delivery cargo missile weapons is about
Speaker 1: eleven hundred tons.
Speaker 2: These are metric tons. By the way, the community.
Speaker 1: Of railway workers of Belarus believes that all this cargo
Speaker 1: is somehow connected with Russian tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus.
Speaker 1: In addition, the Belarusian railway is carrying out so called
Speaker 1: personnel purges, quote unquote any suspicion of disloyalty to the
Speaker 1: current regime, which honestly the Belarusian leader in Putin are
Speaker 1: like homies. It's he like wants it to be a bromance. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: Putin's kind of like, yeah, you're kind of cool, but
Speaker 1: you know, calm down. Meanwhile, that dude is like he'd
Speaker 1: be riding for a vlad anyway.
Speaker 2: He said.
Speaker 1: Basically, anything that seems like they're being disloyal to the
Speaker 1: current regime will result in the immediate dismissal of any
Speaker 1: railway worker, regardless of his or her value. Even those
Speaker 1: railway workers who signed in favor of nominating candidates alternative
Speaker 1: to Lukashenko were dismissed.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I had an issue remembering his name, Lukashenko.
Speaker 1: In the end, it can be said that the Belarusian
Speaker 1: Railway has carried out all all preparatory work aimed at
Speaker 1: ensuring the safety and secrecy of the transport of tactical
Speaker 1: nuclear weapons.
Speaker 2: From Russia to Belarus.
Speaker 1: So the conclusion of this very long article, and again
Speaker 1: we kind of jump down to the bottom of it here,
Speaker 1: the deployment of Russian tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus has
Speaker 1: heightened military tensions in the region and increase the risks
Speaker 1: of military escalation. For Belarus, this decision has brought more
Speaker 1: threats than benefits. The country has found itself in the
Speaker 1: position of a hostage of Russia's nuclear strategy, which undermines
Speaker 1: its independence and security. To Belarus, nuclear weapons do not
Speaker 1: offer security. They serve as tools of Russian coercion, perpetuating
Speaker 1: intimidation and reinforcing colonial hierarchies rather than fostering stability. The
Speaker 1: only way to ensure sovereignty, security, and commitment to peace
Speaker 1: is for Belarus to join the Treaty of the Prohibition
Speaker 1: of Nuclear Weapons. This treaty provides a clear and unequivocal
Speaker 1: prohibition of the transfer, storage, or stationing of nuclear weapons
Speaker 1: and would break us free from cycles of domination and
Speaker 1: threats and would build a foundation for Belarus re entering
Speaker 1: the international.
Speaker 2: Stage as a non nuclear weapons state.
Speaker 1: So, like I said, obviously there's gonna be biases on
Speaker 1: this article. But Tony, while you're still here, I know
Speaker 1: you're gonna have to take off early tonight on your end.
Speaker 1: Have you heard of anything as far as Russian and
Speaker 1: I'm not even gonna say nukes, because, like I said,
Speaker 1: it's very suggestive that these were nuclear or tactical nuclear
Speaker 1: weapons that were transported.
Speaker 2: That's not for sure.
Speaker 1: Even if something's got an explosive logo on it, that's
Speaker 1: not that's not a correlation necessarily.
Speaker 2: What is your take, right.
Speaker 5: I hadn't heard of this either, so thank you for
Speaker 5: the story. It's another WMD story. So yeah, maybe it's true,
Speaker 5: maybe it's not, but I'm a little skeptical. I have
Speaker 5: also heard allegations that the US has temporarily trafficked nuclear
Speaker 5: warheads through Germany and through India, which Russia and China
Speaker 5: complain about, and Pakistan. Obviously, I'm not sure if that's
Speaker 5: actually true. Not either, so these would all be violations
Speaker 5: of the Non Proliferation Treaties. I have not heard of
Speaker 5: that tp NW before. I was gonna look at look
Speaker 5: it up and see if it's a different thing. The
Speaker 5: NPT is from the early seventies, I think, yeah, and
Speaker 5: this other one, I need to look it up and
Speaker 5: see what it actually says.
Speaker 2: I agree with you here.
Speaker 1: Now, keep in mind, just a few months ago, Donald
Speaker 1: Trump called up Old Great Britain and asked them to
Speaker 1: hold on to a couple of tactical nukes for us.
Speaker 2: That's that's I'm not gonna say unprecedented.
Speaker 1: We haven't sent some of our nukes to be stored
Speaker 1: in another country in decades, like no, no ifans or
Speaker 1: butts about it in decades. Meanwhile, the United Kingdom currently
Speaker 1: is holding on to some nukes for US just in case. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: if Russia was to do the same thing in Belarus,
Speaker 1: now it's a problem.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: Granted, the UK does have nukes of their own, So like,
Speaker 1: as far as the non proliferation like you're talking about,
Speaker 1: it's not that's not like a huge thing, but it's
Speaker 1: still it's kind of a you know, rules for the
Speaker 1: not for me kind of thing. So I could absolutely
Speaker 1: see the the unfairness of it for sure.
Speaker 5: Yeah. Another thing is Britain developed its own nukes by itself,
Speaker 5: so maybe that doesn't violate the NPT, but transporting nukes
Speaker 5: through any other non nuclear weapons state would violate it.
Speaker 2: In my tinion.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And I mean, to my knowledge, Belarus is a
Speaker 1: non nuclear state. I'm sure that they have had some
Speaker 1: secret underground silos for years. Lukashank and you are in
Speaker 1: agreement with that, by the way, right, like Lukashenko is
Speaker 1: like homeboys with lad Yeah.
Speaker 5: I think he was way more fifty to fifty on
Speaker 5: the fence until twenty nineteen, and then there was almost
Speaker 5: allegedly a color revolution in his country. Yeah, And ever
Speaker 5: since then he's been far like one hundred percent for
Speaker 5: pro Putin, and they've talked about creating something called a
Speaker 5: union state, which would kind of dissolve the national boundaries
Speaker 5: between them, kind of going back to the Soviet Union days.
Speaker 1: Which, if I'm not mistaken, the long for lack of
Speaker 1: better words, I'm going to call it the seventy mile
Speaker 1: traffic jam of Russian assets that we're trying to make
Speaker 1: their way to Kiev. They went through Belarus to get there, right,
Speaker 1: you know, I don't know, because Belaruz is.
Speaker 2: The country just to the north of Ukraine.
Speaker 1: If I'm not mistaken, It's been a while since I
Speaker 1: looked at a map, but I was of the opinion
Speaker 1: that at least if Belarus is not completely on team Russia,
Speaker 1: they're at least playing the role of.
Speaker 2: Super swayable neutral, you know what I mean?
Speaker 5: I don't know, huh, so Hey, I just looked up
Speaker 5: this TPTNW it says. According to Grock, it's a legally
Speaker 5: binding international treaty that comprehensibly, pro comprehensibly prohibits nuclear weapons
Speaker 5: with the ultimate goal of their total elimination. So it
Speaker 5: sounds like it's way newer. Adopted by the UN General
Speaker 5: Assembly in twenty seven teen, entered into force in twenty
Speaker 5: twenty one. I had not even heard of this. I'm
Speaker 5: kind of surprised because I am kind of interested in
Speaker 5: this subject. I wonder if Scott Horton talked about this
Speaker 5: in his book Hotter than the Sun, Time to Abolish
Speaker 5: Nuclear Weapons, which that don't have gotten around getting yet.
Speaker 2: Was that a newer book.
Speaker 5: Yeah, this was Scott horton book. It's probably like four
Speaker 5: years old now. But yeah, this is way newer than
Speaker 5: the Non Proliferation Treaty, which is from the seventies. And yeah,
Speaker 5: this one goes way farther.
Speaker 2: That's fascinating.
Speaker 5: I'm pretty sure that the US would not sign on
Speaker 5: to this. But no, let me see.
Speaker 1: There's no way in hell the US is going to
Speaker 1: do anything to get rid of new because, if anything,
Speaker 1: we might kind of very similar to how we the
Speaker 1: moab that Trump dropped a couple of years back. It's like,
Speaker 1: because these things have a shelf life, nuclear weapons also
Speaker 1: have a shelf life.
Speaker 2: They do require some maintenance from time to time.
Speaker 1: It's not like it's not like a you know, a bullet,
Speaker 1: where you build it and you put it away in
Speaker 1: a dry temperature cool environment and it's just gonna stay
Speaker 1: perfectly fine for years and years. They do actually take
Speaker 1: a bit of maintenance as time goes on. So I
Speaker 1: could see us maybe dismantling some older nukes that are
Speaker 1: not as capable of some of the newer things that
Speaker 1: we have developed over the past few decades and things. Sure, uh,
Speaker 1: getting rid of our nuclear arsenal now there's there's literally
Speaker 1: less than a zero percent chance of that.
Speaker 2: Say, I'm with you on that.
Speaker 5: Oh and I just googled the or rock to the
Speaker 5: NATO Nuclear Sharing Host.
Speaker 2: Cut up, you cut out there, Tony.
Speaker 5: Well, I'm trying to read super fast.
Speaker 2: But I think I'm sorry.
Speaker 5: It sounds like some you know, gravity nuclear bombs are
Speaker 5: stored here, but not missile based ones.
Speaker 1: Okay, interesting, Sam, I see your hand raised, brother, what
Speaker 1: you got.
Speaker 3: Yeah, So when you say gravity base, hold on, I'm
Speaker 3: coming off the heater. When you say gravity based nukes
Speaker 3: are you talking about like the Rods of God from
Speaker 3: Call of Duty Ghost when they drop the fucking to
Speaker 3: twenty foot lightning like it's a twenty foot pole.
Speaker 1: It's basically a telephone pole full made of tungsten. Then
Speaker 1: they dropped from a satellite.
Speaker 2: Yeah, oh yeah, I just heard of those.
Speaker 5: No, this is not that, this is just bombs drops
Speaker 5: from before us.
Speaker 3: Yeah, don't we actually have the tonguesten rods in space?
Speaker 4: We could do it.
Speaker 1: So I've looked into this extensively. Could we have those? Yes,
Speaker 1: we we could have them. We have the capabilities, we
Speaker 1: have the technology, all this stuff. Do we per my
Speaker 1: current understanding? No, it was a theory that was proposed,
Speaker 1: and they showed the destruction that it could really do
Speaker 1: without the you know, nuclear fallout and all these types
Speaker 1: of things. But once, remember how I told you just
Speaker 1: a few minutes ago that the amount of weight down
Speaker 1: to the most minute gram or microgramm or whatever nanogram
Speaker 1: has to be accounted for just to get the appropriate
Speaker 1: amount of fuel and lift off of one of these rockets.
Speaker 1: Brother for them to do what was proposed basically to
Speaker 1: have a satellite float around in space with ten tungsten
Speaker 1: telephone poles on it, just waiting for the call to drop.
Speaker 1: That is, it's just not practical. And so to my understanding,
Speaker 1: it was a idea that was proposed and then shelved.
Speaker 1: To my knowledge, we do not.
Speaker 3: Have that counterpoint. When the fuck has our government ever
Speaker 3: did anything logical?
Speaker 2: This is a very good point.
Speaker 1: You also need to keep in mind the administration when
Speaker 1: that project was first brought to the light. It wasn't
Speaker 1: like this is under Reagan, where he's just like, huh,
Speaker 1: if we could.
Speaker 2: Do, let's just throw it at it, let's go.
Speaker 1: No, it was, if I'm not mistaken, that was first
Speaker 1: proposed under Clinton, who wasn't exactly the biggest fan of
Speaker 1: our military.
Speaker 2: He wasn't the only one that was President.
Speaker 4: Oh, I'm getting in the bush mixed up.
Speaker 1: But even still, even if it was under Bush and
Speaker 1: that was proposed, he was fighting two wars and during
Speaker 1: his first term in office, and all of the excess
Speaker 1: military spending was going to Afghanistan Iraq.
Speaker 2: He was not about to foot the bill for give
Speaker 2: or take. And I'm being generous with this one trillion
Speaker 2: dollars to put some metal telephone poles in the sky
Speaker 2: for just in case. Now when we have ICBM technology
Speaker 2: already here, you see what I'm saying. It's not feasible,
Speaker 2: it's not practical.
Speaker 6: But it could have made fuel too, you don't even know, no, no, no,
Speaker 6: So even even besides the fuel that you would need
Speaker 6: to get those riches up there, and good luck on that, right.
Speaker 7: But also if you're if you're going to have a satellite,
Speaker 7: it's there's going to be a gravitational pull and there's
Speaker 7: going to have to be fuel to push those back
Speaker 7: into their proper quote unquote orbit. That would be extensive. Yeah,
Speaker 7: and then even even the space required for tetle those
Speaker 7: holy hell, and like even if you like basically took
Speaker 7: it apart in sections and just set it out there
Speaker 7: like it's as you said, it's not practical, especially whenever
Speaker 7: we already have things that are in place that can
Speaker 7: do as much damage. And sometimes at the end of
Speaker 7: the day, you don't really care what the fallout is.
Speaker 5: Yeah, speculation too is you know, wouldn't they hit the
Speaker 5: ground and you know, penetrate into the ground and release
Speaker 5: most of their energy underground? Wouldn't that be a problem.
Speaker 5: Normally it's better to detonate the warhead surface level or
Speaker 5: even a little above surface.
Speaker 1: Agree, this is more like the desert. This is more
Speaker 1: like if you're dropping in a city. You're talking about
Speaker 1: collapsing entire city blocks without explosives. The science is real,
Speaker 1: and I've looked into it, like the the behind it
Speaker 1: is sound. And now I will say this too, now
Speaker 1: that Tesla has created reusable rockets, it might be a
Speaker 1: lot more cost effective now more than ever to get
Speaker 1: the rods of God up in the sky. But to
Speaker 1: my knowledge right now, we haven't actually done that.
Speaker 2: So might.
Speaker 3: This might just be the morbid sense of me. But
Speaker 3: I think when we do it, we should the first
Speaker 3: two we should use. We should name them Sodom and Gomore.
Speaker 1: You want to the first hungsten rod that gets dropped.
Speaker 1: You wanted it to be named off of the thing
Speaker 1: where the term sodomy comes from.
Speaker 3: No, whytically, but no, I mean God is the ultimate
Speaker 3: pegging dog.
Speaker 4: Wait, where's Blumkin at?
Speaker 8: Uh?
Speaker 2: He's not on here?
Speaker 3: But no, Well think about it, right, God destroyed Sodom
Speaker 3: and Goamore with hell fire and brimstone from the heavens.
Speaker 3: We're just like now it's like, well, we're not God,
Speaker 3: but we're gonna send this twenty foot fucking fallusy you
Speaker 3: go fuck yourself.
Speaker 4: Yeah, makes sense to me.
Speaker 1: I like where your head's at. But also, bro, come on,
Speaker 1: that's that's that's almost too biblical. Even I'm not saying sacrilege.
Speaker 1: That's a bit on the nose.
Speaker 2: Or I should say up the rear, honestly, but yeah,
Speaker 2: I see what you're saying.
Speaker 7: The Jews with that one too.
Speaker 2: Oh, they're gonna blame the Jews for it. Broyce, you
Speaker 2: already know somehow the Jews, because that's game, dude.
Speaker 1: If you find any problem the the milk is too
Speaker 1: expensive in the store, right, it doesn't matter.
Speaker 2: In three steps you can find a reason to blame
Speaker 2: the Jews. That's like the.
Speaker 4: Hold on is that why? Oh that one has ridges?
Speaker 5: Hold on?
Speaker 7: Uh?
Speaker 4: Oh is that?
Speaker 7: Why?
Speaker 4: Then doesn't have ridges?
Speaker 2: What is that of the nickel?
Speaker 9: That's a nickel, it's smooth.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the you don't have ridges because obviously the Jews,
Speaker 1: obviously the Zionists of the world felt the need to
Speaker 1: remove the No that Nicholas never.
Speaker 2: Ja for this, there really is. I'm sure no on
Speaker 2: the Chat. No on the Chat is very appropriated. Oh
Speaker 2: my god, now I have to look at this. You
Speaker 2: did this to me. Yep, here we go always. Oh man,
Speaker 2: let's see this here.
Speaker 1: Uh, to understand who controls you? Look at who you
Speaker 1: can't criticize.
Speaker 2: Who are you talking about? The Jews? You just criticize them. Hmmm.
Speaker 3: No, if you you criticize the Jews or the Muslims,
Speaker 3: either one, you can criticize either one.
Speaker 4: Congratulations to any anti Semitic.
Speaker 2: I'm just saying it's the fucking gypsies.
Speaker 7: Dog.
Speaker 2: Everybody wants to get mad at the Muslims. Here's the deal.
Speaker 2: The big wars.
Speaker 1: The big wars are between the geometry people and the
Speaker 1: squiggly line people.
Speaker 2: I figured this.
Speaker 1: We can call them the Jews and Muslims if you want.
Speaker 1: Look the flags lines, Yes, they're awesome to be around.
Speaker 1: But when you look at the people with the squiggly
Speaker 1: lines on their flags, they typically have a real hard
Speaker 1: problem with the geometry people, i e.
Speaker 2: The people with the triangles on their flags.
Speaker 1: They've been at it for so long it's insane.
Speaker 2: Six years old.
Speaker 1: On three things just got said all at the same time.
Speaker 1: Who said what now?
Speaker 7: I said, it's the green versus blue. But if you
Speaker 7: look at the colors. So a lot of Islam's a
Speaker 7: lot of their stuff is green, A lot of the
Speaker 7: Jews stuff is blue, so that's fair.
Speaker 3: So does that mean that the Jews set up with
Speaker 3: the Asians because they're yellow to make the green bastards depends.
Speaker 1: On which line of ideology you go down. If you
Speaker 1: look at the prophet Yakoub Blessings be under his name,
Speaker 1: he in six hundred years on the island of Patmos,
Speaker 1: forced bred his sixteen thousand followers to go from black
Speaker 1: to red, which would be Japanese people, to yellow, which
Speaker 1: would be Chinese people, to white, which would be the
Speaker 1: European people. But Native American people aren't red because they're black,
Speaker 1: according to the Nation of Islam and the prophet Yakup Blessed.
Speaker 4: Okay, so all that right there. I don't know.
Speaker 3: First things first, the first Japanese people quote unquote, actually
Speaker 3: came from the ship from fucking China, like the main
Speaker 3: man of fucking Asia.
Speaker 1: These real history and logic. When you're talking to these
Speaker 1: types of people, they're not going to acknowledge that.
Speaker 4: Oh they're like the Heaven's Gate motherfuckers.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Actually this is the same group that Muhammad Ali
Speaker 1: was a part of I should mention that and.
Speaker 2: Welcome.
Speaker 3: Yeah, but also the chick oh that sings swing low,
Speaker 3: sweet Jerry, it's one of like James, Yeah, Edda James,
Speaker 3: she was also part of it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, she was a proud sister of the Nation of
Speaker 2: Islam for sure, and.
Speaker 3: Which they believe is actually if I'm not mistaken as
Speaker 3: a supremacist group of sorts.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's it is a black supremacist group.
Speaker 3: It is, you know, all children of the Lord, all
Speaker 3: differences of whek.
Speaker 1: Bro, have you ever gotten into like some sort of
Speaker 1: a conversation with the They're called the Sakari, which is
Speaker 1: funny because historically speaking, the Sakari were a group of
Speaker 1: Jewish by this time, let's just go ahead and say
Speaker 1: like Hebrew assassins, like they were actually created to be
Speaker 1: the opposite of the assassin's creed. They were also later
Speaker 1: no no no, no, no, no no no no. See at
Speaker 1: one point they were called the Zelots. Then later on
Speaker 1: they got called the Sakari. Right, was it a Paul?
Speaker 4: Was it Paul that?
Speaker 2: What was z Simon was a Zealot?
Speaker 3: Yeah, he was a zealot and he actually un he
Speaker 3: gave up the blade to become devout to Jesus.
Speaker 2: Correct.
Speaker 1: Correct, But so there is a group of African American
Speaker 1: gentlemen who believe that black people are the true Hebrew Israelites.
Speaker 1: They they call themselves that, not Jewish, they call themselves
Speaker 1: Hebrew Israelites. And they will go to any major city
Speaker 1: and they're wearing these Uh. I don't want to call
Speaker 1: it costumes, but I also don't want to call it
Speaker 1: bed sheets.
Speaker 2: It's something in the middle.
Speaker 1: And they just scream hatred and all these things towards
Speaker 1: anybody who's not black. And so I saw, you know
Speaker 1: pretty much, and now I remember, No, it's Judaism.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: And it's funny because I've I've wanted so bad to
Speaker 1: find a member of the Nation of Islam and a
Speaker 1: member of the Sakari or the nation of Hebrew Israelites. However,
Speaker 1: you want to give these people their determinations on this,
Speaker 1: and I want to get them to debate on the
Speaker 1: show one day, because both of these groups believe that
Speaker 1: their religion is the true religion of the black man.
Speaker 1: And I'm a white guy, so I have have no
Speaker 1: dog in this fight whatsoever. I you know what I'm saying,
Speaker 1: that's that's not me. But I do find their take
Speaker 1: on the literature very interesting. So these dudes are the
Speaker 1: first time I really had a conversation with them. I
Speaker 1: don't want to say a screaming match, because I was
Speaker 1: very cordial the entire time. They were screaming at me
Speaker 1: the whole time, and they kept calling me wat boy
Speaker 1: in like very derogatory term, but it was like really funny,
Speaker 1: so like it's cool, like whatever, yeah, that's what I thought,
Speaker 1: white boy. I'm like, oh, oh, oh, don't don't call
Speaker 1: me that. But whatever, it's fine, it's fine. I was
Speaker 1: in New Orleans. Actually I was on Bourbon Street. I
Speaker 1: was about five hand grenades deep at that moment, and uh,
Speaker 1: you know, I had my peace and my steel on
Speaker 1: me because I never leave home without it, so I
Speaker 1: wasn't worried about like an altercation. But these people were
Speaker 1: screaming some rhetoric, and I decided, you know what, I
Speaker 1: want to hear what you have to say, sir, let's
Speaker 1: let's go here. Because they were quoting from the Bible,
Speaker 1: not from the Torah, not from the Talmud, not from
Speaker 1: the they were quoting from the King James Bible.
Speaker 2: So I was very curious.
Speaker 1: You know me, I'm never wanting to shy away from
Speaker 1: a good old head to head when it comes to
Speaker 1: some words and some books and things, and uh, they're
Speaker 1: The cherry picking that was being done was hilarious. The
Speaker 1: misinterpretations were also, some would say insulting. I thought it
Speaker 1: was a rip snort in good time. And so I
Speaker 1: was sitting there and as I'm having this conversation with them,
Speaker 1: I am steady sipping on my sixth hand grenade right, which,
Speaker 1: for those that don't know, think of a Long Island
Speaker 1: iced tea on steroids. And uh so, you know, after
Speaker 1: their spiel, I was like, all right, hold on, hold on, man,
Speaker 1: hold on, what do I have to do as a
Speaker 1: white man to be accepted into heaven? Because by your standards,
Speaker 1: I'm doomed to go to hell anyway, just off of birthright,
Speaker 1: So let's say that I believe everything you've told me
Speaker 1: this evening, I recognize the error of my whiteness, and
Speaker 1: I want to go to heaven.
Speaker 2: What do I need to do?
Speaker 1: And he's like, well, white boy, yere's only two ways
Speaker 1: that you can go to heaven.
Speaker 2: I'm like, well, I would love to hear him. You
Speaker 2: just let me know one.
Speaker 1: You could go home tonight, pray that God takes mercy
Speaker 1: on your disgusting white soul and kill yourself and hope
Speaker 1: that he's gracious when you meet him. And I'm like, so,
Speaker 1: I'm just right off the rip. I'm going to say
Speaker 1: no to door number one.
Speaker 2: What is door number two?
Speaker 1: He took his foot and put it up on this
Speaker 1: stool that was standing next to him. You bow down
Speaker 1: and kiss my boot and acknowledge you a place as subservient.
Speaker 2: To the black man.
Speaker 1: And I'm just like, oh, well, I'm gonna be honest
Speaker 1: with you. I'm not subservient to any man, regardless of race.
Speaker 1: I thought we were having a good conversation here, but
Speaker 1: now this is you took it to a level. Didn't
Speaker 1: need to go to sir. So anyway, I bid you
Speaker 1: a fawn farewell. They yeah, they felt like that was
Speaker 1: somehow a victory whatever. But the Nation of Islam, those
Speaker 1: people are just as psychotic, and they all believe in
Speaker 1: some sort of a version of the story where the
Speaker 1: white man was genetically created in a very short amount
Speaker 1: of time to punish the black man, which are the
Speaker 1: true inheritors of the things and the stuff it's a
Speaker 1: wild belief system, to say the least. I still want
Speaker 1: to get at least one representative of each of these
Speaker 1: groups onto the Culture Conspiracy one day and just have
Speaker 1: an open conversation. I'll just be the mediator. I'm not
Speaker 1: here to like say that either one of these dudes
Speaker 1: are wrong, because they're both so fucking wrong, But like,
Speaker 1: I would love to just kind of be there to
Speaker 1: stir the pot a little bit and hear their justifications
Speaker 1: as to why they believe what they believe. You know,
Speaker 1: it's like real weaponized autism on two very polar opposite
Speaker 1: ends of the spectrum, and just let them get after it.
Speaker 1: You know, I think that would make for great content.
Speaker 1: I don't know, just say, I'm going ahead. I'm afraid
Speaker 1: of what you're about to say, sir, but go ahead.
Speaker 4: I'm just gonna call Kettle Will fucking Kettle.
Speaker 3: Both of those groups sound racist as fuck, and God
Speaker 3: himself would not. He would look at them and discuss
Speaker 3: because well all his children.
Speaker 1: Oh no, even I came back at them with that.
Speaker 1: I was like, so, what about this part where Jesus
Speaker 1: says that, like there's no more Jews, there's no more
Speaker 1: gentilegy no more Greek, There's no more Roman as far
Speaker 1: as God's concerned. They took that and twisted it and
Speaker 1: continued on with their rhetoric as if I didn't even
Speaker 1: ask that question.
Speaker 3: I'm all, I worked with a black age, like a
Speaker 3: true like hardcore racist one.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you know the group I'm talking about.
Speaker 3: Then, yeah, And he was like God was God's a
Speaker 3: black man and he hates white man. I was like, so,
Speaker 3: if God hated me, why did he create anything? Because
Speaker 3: God doesn't create things he hates and he and he said, oh,
Speaker 3: because you're the child of the devil. I'm like, oh,
Speaker 3: the sense that if that's the case, I pray that
Speaker 3: your bloodline ends because you're a piece of shit, So
Speaker 3: curses upon you and your bloodline.
Speaker 1: And I worked with a guy like that too, although
Speaker 1: he wasn't spitting hatred, he just had his beliefs on it.
Speaker 1: And I didn't know that until I watched him order
Speaker 1: a well done steak one day. And I'm gonna be
Speaker 1: honest with you. I'm not gonna I try. I try
Speaker 1: very hard not to judge people, right, but.
Speaker 3: If we order a well done steak, you're a psychopath
Speaker 3: and not the fun.
Speaker 1: Cat like I'm just saying, like, bro, what are we
Speaker 1: doing here? You know it's and it depends on the
Speaker 1: type of meat. I understand that, and for like cleanliness reasons,
Speaker 1: I get that, and if it is for religious reasons,
Speaker 1: I can respect it.
Speaker 2: I can.
Speaker 1: But knowing the level of bullshit this guy was on
Speaker 1: and then watching him order a.
Speaker 2: Well done steak, it was like, I don't know if.
Speaker 1: I'll ever be able to really like trust you like
Speaker 1: on some on on some levels here. And it wasn't
Speaker 1: because of his religious conviction, although later I found out
Speaker 1: that he acknowledges himself to be a Hebrew Israelite. It
Speaker 1: was because he preferred the taste of a well done
Speaker 1: and I'm like, see, that's.
Speaker 2: That's my issue.
Speaker 4: So he likes bootleather.
Speaker 1: Apparently, so then somehow I'm the boot liquor when he's
Speaker 1: actually eating bootlegs, Like, you know, what what do I do?
Speaker 2: Some people schild your dog.
Speaker 4: He must have been dropped on his head.
Speaker 3: And I say that as someone who's active, who's actionous.
Speaker 3: My daddy and Uncle Joey were playing toss and I
Speaker 3: was the ball. I was like, yeah, yeah, I was
Speaker 3: like I was a young and young and not I wantn't,
Speaker 3: but I landed hit my head and that you that
Speaker 3: was my first concussion.
Speaker 1: Oh no, wait wait wait, wait wait wait, hold on now,
Speaker 1: everybody stop the presses, hold the phone. Tony has hit
Speaker 1: me with something that I have to verify.
Speaker 2: So he started off by.
Speaker 1: Saying, I figure why did he create Esau or the
Speaker 1: Amalekites either if he hated them? And I'm with you
Speaker 1: on this, But now his next comments has me a
Speaker 1: little shook.
Speaker 2: If Trump likes well done steaks.
Speaker 1: FYI, Trump thinks people have been always trying to assassinate
Speaker 1: him and somehow well done steak is a defense. Tony,
Speaker 1: is this? Is this a fact? Or is this like
Speaker 1: a tabloid thing? I need to know.
Speaker 5: This well, I've heard it several times. Let's see what
Speaker 5: Grock hasts to say.
Speaker 1: Because I'm be honest with you. If I knew that,
Speaker 1: I don't know if I would have voted for him.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying I would have voted for the whore either,
Speaker 1: but I probably would have voted for a third option.
Speaker 3: What we In Bump's defense, he is a fucking Yankee,
Speaker 3: so you can't hold it against him.
Speaker 1: I will, in fact, I will, in fact hold this
Speaker 1: against him. He's not Hebrew, he's not Muslim. There is
Speaker 1: no reason for him, as a hot man to be
Speaker 1: ordering a well done steak like he is. Like, that's
Speaker 1: a normal thing, absolute lutely not. I draw the line.
Speaker 3: He's He's a Yankee and they don't always have common sense.
Speaker 1: He's from New York, where veal was made into the
Speaker 1: thing that we know in love today. Yes, I understand
Speaker 1: it's Italian by nature. I'm saying, like, when you think
Speaker 1: of like a good New York vial dog, no no,
Speaker 1: no no.
Speaker 4: I think of the mafia and I think of New York.
Speaker 2: That literally my point, literally my point.
Speaker 4: I think of I.
Speaker 7: Think they met a little bit bloody.
Speaker 3: You think of the Italians, the Jews, and that's about it.
Speaker 1: When I think of New York too, I honestly think
Speaker 1: of the Irish. I think of the Chinese. The little
Speaker 1: the Chinatown in New York City is pilp.
Speaker 2: I will say that I want.
Speaker 3: To see I wanted to see Koa Town, and I
Speaker 3: want to visit Korea, the Philippines in Japan. I have
Speaker 3: to before I die. I must see the ancestral homelands
Speaker 3: for sure.
Speaker 2: All right, Tony, what what did Grox say.
Speaker 5: Okay, Well, CrOx said, yeah, it's well known he likes
Speaker 5: the steaks well done, and it came up with a
Speaker 5: couple of websites, nothing like pe authoritative, like the takeout
Speaker 5: dot com. I've never heard of that before. But it
Speaker 5: even says that he pairs not only does he like
Speaker 5: them charred and be a rock on a plate, there
Speaker 5: are reports of him ordering them that way at restaurants
Speaker 5: like B L T Prime in d C. According to
Speaker 5: the Food Republic dot com and eater dot com. And
Speaker 5: it says he also pairs them with ketchup, which adds
Speaker 5: to the food critics. Maybe he's just doing it to
Speaker 5: troll people.
Speaker 2: But I got nothing else for the man.
Speaker 5: That's just too sacred.
Speaker 2: I got nothing else for the man. What. No, absolutely not.
Speaker 2: This has shipped.
Speaker 5: You know, Truman and Reagan apparently like steaks well done too.
Speaker 2: Well know that.
Speaker 10: Truman didn't know that right on you Again, if it
Speaker 10: was for religious reasons, I could at least respect it.
Speaker 1: And like, fine, cool. I may not like it, but
Speaker 1: I don't have to abide by their religious beliefs and
Speaker 1: everybody could live happily in peace. Fine, what what are
Speaker 1: we talking about here? Like, I'm yeah, man, it's not
Speaker 1: I was the biggest fan of Trump before this information
Speaker 1: came out. At this point, he's on the fucking Epstein list, y'all.
Speaker 1: It's not even a joke anymore. He clearly was fucking kids,
Speaker 1: like what, Oh my god.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 5: Magazine also says he likes it with ketchup. So yeah,
Speaker 5: some more reputable sources, there's there's plenty in here.
Speaker 2: Putting steak on a ketchup?
Speaker 10: What the fucking audacity ketchup?
Speaker 5: Yeah, that's how flustered we are.
Speaker 2: Yeah wait, wait, wait, Royce, what were you saying?
Speaker 7: I said the way you said he puts steak on
Speaker 7: his ketch up, though it was just kind.
Speaker 1: Of I said, like women, man, yeah he does. He
Speaker 1: treats objects like women. He doesn't treat women like objects
Speaker 1: because that acknowledges them to be people, all right, But
Speaker 1: like no, I did, Yeah, this is this is ridiculous,
Speaker 1: This is absurd, and he has to I said it
Speaker 1: like that, putting his steak on his ketchup, because there's
Speaker 1: no way you're going to have flavor on a well
Speaker 1: done steak unless you're literally dunking in a whole bowl
Speaker 1: of ketchup. And just like getting like this is absurd.
Speaker 7: I get, I get the reference. I was just laughing.
Speaker 7: I was enjoying it.
Speaker 2: That's it. And I hope Royce, I understand for your
Speaker 2: religious reasons, you also enjoy well done steak. I hope
Speaker 2: you're not.
Speaker 1: Taking wait wait, hold on, hold the phone, please hold
Speaker 1: the front door.
Speaker 2: WHOA.
Speaker 7: First of all, why don't you ask me how I
Speaker 7: like my steak before making an assumption, sir?
Speaker 2: Because I thought you said this before. But oh we can't.
Speaker 2: We did it.
Speaker 7: We can't. We can't have blown our steak. But like
Speaker 7: after the whole entire process, the juices are there and
Speaker 7: you can have a rare steak. You can have a
Speaker 7: medium or your steak. The only time and as far
Speaker 7: as Jewish history, that you can that you have meat
Speaker 7: that you can't have it any other way was for
Speaker 7: was for the past sacrifice like that it needed to
Speaker 7: be eaten, roasted, can't be eaten, can't be boiled, can't
Speaker 7: be like that was very very specific. But besides that,
Speaker 7: like have ham or well not have ham, but go ham,
Speaker 7: like go with what you want.
Speaker 1: So now I'm gonna have to explore what a rare
Speaker 1: kosher steak is like anything.
Speaker 7: It should be almost no different, just it's the juices
Speaker 7: should still be there. It's just drained of blood and
Speaker 7: salted of excess stuff, but it's still juicy.
Speaker 2: This is This is very interesting, Royce.
Speaker 1: You know, I try to keep things relatively g rated
Speaker 1: on this show, relatively right.
Speaker 2: But now I have to ask you a question.
Speaker 1: There's no polite way to ask this, and uh to
Speaker 1: anybody who's listening to the Cage to Night. Just so
Speaker 1: we're all clear here, I do, in fact respect women.
Speaker 1: Before I ask it, I'm about to ask, I wanted
Speaker 1: to understood. I do in fact see women in a
Speaker 1: very very very positive light. That being said, Royce, I'm
Speaker 1: assuming that there is no rules against oral.
Speaker 2: Pleasuring your woman.
Speaker 1: H Is this a thing that can happen every day
Speaker 1: of the month, sir? Or because the doctrine is that
Speaker 1: also seen as non kosher for at least one week
Speaker 1: every month?
Speaker 2: Minds want to know.
Speaker 7: So religious couples they do not touch at all during
Speaker 7: however many day hold on, hold on, hold on.
Speaker 2: No unclean when they're on their period. Correct.
Speaker 7: So yeah, but so very very aniting the whole idea
Speaker 7: of a purity because technically, since we don't have the
Speaker 7: ashes of the red bull. Every jew has has the
Speaker 7: essence of a we're all, we're all to we're all impure.
Speaker 2: Got you?
Speaker 1: But do they also kind of get down like the
Speaker 1: Muslims were like a negative plus and negative equals are positive.
Speaker 11: No, unfortunately, not so anyway, So I anyways, right, so
Speaker 11: unfortunately for however many days a woman is on our
Speaker 11: period and then seven days afterwards.
Speaker 7: There's no touching seven days after correct Basically, yes, yeah,
Speaker 7: all right.
Speaker 12: At that point.
Speaker 7: Not everybody follows it every orthodox, but I mean, I'll
Speaker 7: play that. There are plenty people to do it. There
Speaker 7: are some people that that they swear by it, so
Speaker 7: they One of the ideas is that during that period
Speaker 7: of time where you can't and like you want to, like,
Speaker 7: the tension builds and basically by the time you are
Speaker 7: able to become intimate again, then like the spark can
Speaker 7: be there.
Speaker 1: And so but I understand, wait wait wait now I
Speaker 1: have another question, and uh I would like Zombie to
Speaker 1: please speak in on this because I'm a little fuzzy
Speaker 1: on the details here. Ovulation happens right after a period ends,
Speaker 1: correct or is it like two weeks after giving help
Speaker 1: me out here.
Speaker 13: I think we'll unmute for some reason tonight. Yes, well
Speaker 13: it's you have ovulation tractors. Unfortunately, some people drop eggs
Speaker 13: at different points and they ovulate different But most of
Speaker 13: the time leading up you're gonna ovulate, and then afterwards
Speaker 13: you can ovulate too.
Speaker 2: It just depends. Okay, it's before your period is when
Speaker 2: you're in peak ovulation.
Speaker 9: You are healing me see.
Speaker 1: Because I'm curious now, because per old Christian and old
Speaker 1: Jewish and Islam.
Speaker 13: Are going to be, you're going to be ovulated. You
Speaker 13: obviuate afterwards, Yeah, you abbulate afterwards, you abbably like.
Speaker 2: Two weeks roughly afterwards.
Speaker 1: Okay, okay, okay, all right, I'll about to say because
Speaker 1: if it's right after if the point of sex is
Speaker 1: pro creation per scripture, just saying, then you would think
Speaker 1: that as soon as the peer was over, if they're ovulating,
Speaker 1: it's prime time we got to you know, spread our
Speaker 1: seed and be fruitful and multiplying all these things.
Speaker 13: So the week two weeks, yeah, no, So I just
Speaker 13: wanted to make sure because like I know, some people
Speaker 13: unfortunately like that have different disorders. They drop eggs multiple times.
Speaker 4: So it just depends.
Speaker 13: But average, you normally have your period, then you have
Speaker 13: a week of nothing, and then that following week is
Speaker 13: going into your peak fertility cycle, and by like the
Speaker 13: end of that week is you're going.
Speaker 14: To be the most fertile.
Speaker 2: Got you? Okay? Okay, so that makes sense. Yeah.
Speaker 13: Also just want to say though that they actually just
Speaker 13: did a study about period blood and like the massive
Speaker 13: amounts of benefits of period blood and the antimicrobials and
Speaker 13: all the different enzymes in it, and that it's equal
Speaker 13: to stem cells and how it's being used, like they
Speaker 13: want to use it to help create not like it's
Speaker 13: not one hundred percent as stem cells, but it still
Speaker 13: has a lot of benefits to help regenerate cells, and
Speaker 13: it has a lot of anti bacterial stuff in it,
Speaker 13: like pretty much. Even though it's like the waste and
Speaker 13: the shedding of it, the blood itself is actually very
Speaker 13: clean and pure.
Speaker 2: Okay. So I'm not I'm not, I'm not.
Speaker 7: I'm not arguing as far as scientific or whether it
Speaker 7: is or isn't. Just like what so I'll tell you this,
Speaker 7: there's there's no difference as far as Jewish law between
Speaker 7: someone who has touched a dead body. There there you
Speaker 7: have you have an essence of impurity. I don't know.
Speaker 7: It could be also a bad translation of impurity, Like
Speaker 7: whenever somebody says it's it's impure, it has a bad
Speaker 7: and or negative connotation to it. It's not necessarily the
Speaker 7: case in this case. Be like I know plenty of
Speaker 7: very Orthodox news that they love their wives, of respect
Speaker 7: their wives. It has nothing to do with like thinking
Speaker 7: less of a person because of it, right, I mean,
Speaker 7: it's not, it's not it's not a stain on a person,
Speaker 7: because it is something that that God created.
Speaker 2: And correct me if I'm wrong here.
Speaker 1: But even per the the Orthodox beliefs, and and we're
Speaker 1: talking about in the old days when the temple was
Speaker 1: still standing, you couldn't enter even into the court of
Speaker 1: women if you had touched a lizard within so many
Speaker 1: days or even had a wet dream, if I'm not mistaken,
Speaker 1: But those are they both make you right?
Speaker 7: Correct? You you would need to do certain things, you
Speaker 7: would need to imbse yourself, and then you would not
Speaker 7: be able to go in until the following day. Correct.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Yeah, And I don't understand the whole lizard thing.
Speaker 1: I'm sure that goes back to like the serpent in
Speaker 1: the Garden of Eden or something along the.
Speaker 7: No, so it's not it's it's a like dead rodents.
Speaker 15: And by the way, it's not a snake because you
Speaker 15: can actually because like if if it was the case
Speaker 15: to where you would become impure from killing or handling.
Speaker 7: A dead body of a snake, then nobody would kill it.
Speaker 7: So no, so there's like creepy Crawley things.
Speaker 1: Yeah I got you, got you man, and then yeah,
Speaker 1: wet dream. Also you're just yes, clearly unclean.
Speaker 7: Well no hold on. Also, also, if you're intimate with
Speaker 7: your wife, true does it? So it doesn't matter if
Speaker 7: if you are, like whether it's a wet dream or
Speaker 7: whether you are intimate with your partner and you ejaculate,
Speaker 7: like you still have that same impurity, which is interesting
Speaker 7: saying one of So in the the Torah, Miriam So
Speaker 7: Moses's sister was actually punished with sarahs which is equated
Speaker 7: to leprosy, but it's not really leprosy. And she basically
Speaker 7: was was talking smack against Moses because Moses was married
Speaker 7: at one point and then he actually divorced his wife,
Speaker 7: so she was basically talking smack against him, saying, how
Speaker 7: you know, how can you be so holy and then
Speaker 7: divorce to your wife. And basically, right at the point
Speaker 7: where both Aaron and her just finished having sex, he's like,
Speaker 7: all right, come to see me right now, and she
Speaker 7: said uh uh uh, and she was worried because she
Speaker 7: was in a state of impurity, and so that was
Speaker 7: that was That was one of the major major lessons
Speaker 7: of that points like, don't talk shit about a major
Speaker 7: prophet of mine when you don't understand the reason.
Speaker 1: To quote Kat Williams, you shouldn't have been talking shit.
Speaker 1: Absolutely Basically, Sam, your hand is raised and I see
Speaker 1: you chomping at the bit. I again don't know where
Speaker 1: you're about to go, but let's go there together.
Speaker 4: Okay.
Speaker 3: So on my question of ask voice about Judaism. So
Speaker 3: so I do.
Speaker 1: Love how sometimes this show becomes ask a jew this,
Speaker 1: this is awesome.
Speaker 4: It's a cannon point.
Speaker 3: It's a cannon point about that that though, So yeah,
Speaker 3: it's a sin against God to have pre medal sex
Speaker 3: in a penny. It makes you impure to still make
Speaker 3: bring pleasure to your wife even after you're married. So
Speaker 3: what's the fucking point of being married if you gotta
Speaker 3: be set it half the damn time anyway, I.
Speaker 12: Thought the full point of marriage was one to find
Speaker 12: your soulmate, two to love them untraditionally, three to to
Speaker 12: create and have family with them.
Speaker 1: Hold the whole, the whole soul made thing. That's also
Speaker 1: a miss number. Marriage for the vast majority of human
Speaker 1: history has never been about love. It was about strengthening
Speaker 1: ties and business and bargains.
Speaker 2: Must be clear about that.
Speaker 1: Paying a dowry wasn't because you love this woman so
Speaker 1: much you were willing to give her dad X amount
Speaker 1: of cows or whatever. It was because his farm butts
Speaker 1: up to our farm and our kids will have twice
Speaker 1: as much farmland.
Speaker 2: Like that's the primary reason.
Speaker 4: The business aspects of strengthening blood ties and shit. I
Speaker 4: understand that, well, like you can't expect that.
Speaker 3: Like honestand raged marriages, ninety five percent of time they
Speaker 3: walk out because these two people like, hey, we're stuck
Speaker 3: with each other, okay, fine, They going with.
Speaker 1: No expectations, therefore they're not let down. It's crazy, but
Speaker 1: it works, you know.
Speaker 4: Boy.
Speaker 3: The reason I say that true love and everything that
Speaker 3: shit because like my papa was twenty one, my grandmother
Speaker 3: was sixteen when they often got me.
Speaker 4: They've been married forever. My papa died in O nine.
Speaker 3: Even today, my grandmother goes out, goes to his grave
Speaker 3: every month and she leaves flowers and everything. That that woman,
Speaker 3: that that man is still my grandmother's love of her
Speaker 3: life till the day she'll die. I they've had their
Speaker 3: ups and downs and has those in their marriage, as
Speaker 3: all people do. But there at least I know that
Speaker 3: that love I want to love like that right, something
Speaker 3: that that internally.
Speaker 7: So to answer one of your questions, at least, first
Speaker 7: of all, I promise you there's actually zero problem about
Speaker 7: procreating and following these laws. Because guess what I know,
Speaker 7: ortholoxs shoes and they have six seven, eight, nine, ten,
Speaker 7: eleven twelve children. So as start as a procreation aspect,
Speaker 7: there is zero problem with it. There are also hundreds
Speaker 7: of thousands, if not millions, of well probably hundreds of
Speaker 7: thousands of Jews that follow the laws of ritual purity. Additionally,
Speaker 7: all that, as far as the ritual purity, that was
Speaker 7: only to get into the temple, Like so the temple
Speaker 7: is in Jerusalem, if I'm all the way in Tel
Speaker 7: Aviv at that point in time, and like I can't
Speaker 7: get there, So you're you're impure, like it's it's like, eh,
Speaker 7: who cares, right, that's.
Speaker 12: Only for.
Speaker 7: I mean it's like basically the coast to the central Israel.
Speaker 1: I believe Israel is the size of New Jersey. Tel
Speaker 1: Aviv would be like the northernmost big city. Jerusalem would
Speaker 1: be like the southernmost big city.
Speaker 9: I don't look, I know what it is.
Speaker 4: I don't know how big it is.
Speaker 1: Okay, it's a road trip, no, No, is it like
Speaker 1: minutes you could drive. I've driven through the entire state
Speaker 1: of New Jersey in the course of about two hours,
Speaker 1: and that was that was a traffic in shit.
Speaker 2: I mean you know.
Speaker 3: Oh, so it's like so coming from Cordial down to
Speaker 3: Vogue Grove was a lot longer a drive. Yeah, then
Speaker 3: tel Aviv too.
Speaker 7: Actually you're also talking about modern times instead.
Speaker 5: Of like biblical question.
Speaker 7: Well my right.
Speaker 11: But my point though is even still like if you
Speaker 11: don't need to go to the temple, if.
Speaker 7: You're ritually I'm sure you do what you need to do.
Speaker 7: You you dunk yourself in a ritual pool and call
Speaker 7: it call of the day.
Speaker 1: So like, yo, tel Aviv is and just over an
Speaker 1: hour drive from Jerusalem. It's sixty seven point three kilometers,
Speaker 1: So yeah, it's that in English. You know what, I
Speaker 1: don't want to misguided here, so I'm gonna say sixty
Speaker 1: seven kilometers converted.
Speaker 2: Well anyway, sorry Royce, go.
Speaker 1: Ahead, No, that that's it, or like it's forty one
Speaker 1: and a half miles.
Speaker 7: That's not bad. Even even when it came to like
Speaker 7: you know, you are commanded, yeah, to let your wives.
Speaker 7: A matter of fact, that one of some of the
Speaker 7: things that you are religiously obligated to give a wife.
Speaker 7: I think food, shelter, and conjugal obligations like if your
Speaker 7: if your wife says you need to eat this pussy,
Speaker 7: sorry you need you need to do it like you
Speaker 7: like you are encouraged and you should aim to please
Speaker 7: your wife. If she wants to have sex, then you
Speaker 7: have sex.
Speaker 4: It is better to be than it is to accede.
Speaker 1: That is all set.
Speaker 2: That's also a two way street.
Speaker 7: I mean I would say sixty nine. I would say
Speaker 7: sixty nine covers that pretty well.
Speaker 2: But like, yeah, I would.
Speaker 3: Think so, you know, it depends on the do you
Speaker 3: get multiple variations of it, It all depends.
Speaker 2: It's very true.
Speaker 1: This conversation is going on off the rails a bit
Speaker 1: though I like it.
Speaker 2: Here we are.
Speaker 3: Everybody talks about the sixty nins position, but no one
Speaker 3: ever wants to talk about the sixty eighth and that one.
Speaker 4: That's the one that you should learn.
Speaker 1: Like everybody wants to talk about Valentine's Day, but completely
Speaker 1: negates the fact that Steak and blow Job Day is
Speaker 1: absolutely a holiday.
Speaker 2: It's you know what day?
Speaker 7: Is that?
Speaker 1: Because that's one month after Valentine's Day? Wait, you don't
Speaker 1: know about this? See, this is my.
Speaker 2: Point, This is my point. The patriarchy run shit.
Speaker 1: Yet somehow Steak and blow Job Day isn't a nationally
Speaker 1: celebrated holiday.
Speaker 2: Oh but Valentine's Day is.
Speaker 1: It's literally March fourteenth, it's March fourteenth. As Valentine's Day
Speaker 1: is clearly for women, obviously, this is the one clearly
Speaker 1: for men. But apparently, because I'm just gonna say it,
Speaker 1: because of the ad right, they don't have the same
Speaker 1: marketing as Valentine's Day. So, you know, Steak and bj
Speaker 1: Day just gets passed over by so many people and
Speaker 1: they just pretend like that's not a real holiday, you know, sad.
Speaker 3: Okay, and uh, Columbus Day was turned into a national
Speaker 3: holiday to say sheiate the the Italians because five Italians
Speaker 3: got home down south via Lynch Mob.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and it's also now Indigenous People's Day, which I'm
Speaker 1: gonna be honest with you, I'm not mad about.
Speaker 2: Columbus was a raging piece of shit. I don't think
Speaker 2: that's like a heart take.
Speaker 4: He also fucked sheep.
Speaker 2: He did, and and children.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Columbus was actually like a raging piece of shit
Speaker 1: pretty much by every metric that you could uh, you
Speaker 1: could fathom. So reclaiming the day to be Indigenous People's
Speaker 1: Day instead of Columbus Day.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna be honest with you. I'm here for.
Speaker 4: He was an Italian sailing for the fucking Spaniards.
Speaker 1: Yeah, because the Italian crown hated him because all the
Speaker 1: heinous ass ship he did in Italy.
Speaker 3: So why didn't they just hang him in Italy or
Speaker 3: fucking boning him at the steak?
Speaker 1: They damn near banished him, which is why and how
Speaker 1: he ended up in front of the Spanish crown offering
Speaker 1: the same thing, and the Spanish were like, look, worst
Speaker 1: case scenario, this guy dies at sea and we lose
Speaker 1: a couple of ships. Best case scenario. He claims the
Speaker 1: new territory for us, and like, we'll figure it out.
Speaker 1: He comes back with three ships topped to bottom full
Speaker 1: of silver, and they're like, well, the hell looks like
Speaker 1: this was the way thing that paid all four us.
Speaker 3: Why couldn't he just fall off the fucking edge into
Speaker 3: a sault of fader.
Speaker 2: See, that's the deal. There is no edge sometimes.
Speaker 3: Which it reminds me this is a God said God.
Speaker 3: God said that he shall put godly women in all
Speaker 3: four corners of the world.
Speaker 4: Then he made this bitch a globe.
Speaker 2: Yeah, funny how that works out.
Speaker 1: But I still think whenever he brings up the four
Speaker 1: corners of the world, I personally take that to mean
Speaker 1: the four cardinal directions, you know.
Speaker 4: I yeah, north, ye, south, east, West, Yeah. Personally's south
Speaker 4: is best.
Speaker 1: I personally agree. All right, So we have gone way
Speaker 1: off the rails of this conversation. Let's bring it on
Speaker 1: back now, all right.
Speaker 2: So this and I wish Royce was here to talk
Speaker 2: about that. Not Royces, I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: I wish Tony was here to talk about this one,
Speaker 1: but apparently he had to dip out early this night.
Speaker 1: So Trump has now a full twenty eight point Ukraine
Speaker 1: Russia Peace Plan. President Trump's twenty eight point plan for
Speaker 1: Peace and Ukraine would force Kiev to give up additional
Speaker 1: territory in the East, cap the size of its military,
Speaker 1: and agree it will never join NATO, according to a
Speaker 1: draft obtained by Axios and verified by a Ukrainian official,
Speaker 1: a US official, and a source familiar with a proposal.
Speaker 1: So basically, what he's saying is, we're gonna go ahead
Speaker 1: and castraight your military and your ability to defend yourself
Speaker 1: against Russia if they ever step in and want to
Speaker 1: take you over again, you'll just be on your own
Speaker 1: this time. But at least it gives us peace as
Speaker 1: of this moment. What could possibly go wrong, That's the thing.
Speaker 1: And the problem is Zelenski is basically getting bent over
Speaker 1: a barrel right now, and he's got no other options.
Speaker 1: I don't believe that any American politician is ranting and
Speaker 1: raven that we need to send more money to Ukraine.
Speaker 1: That's not the hot take right now, right and most
Speaker 1: NATO countries.
Speaker 2: Have given what they're gonna give.
Speaker 1: You know, you do have Poland aka little European Texas
Speaker 1: that is out there doing the most is don't get
Speaker 1: me wrong, but they're not trying to help Ukraine right now.
Speaker 1: They're trying to defend their own border and strengthen their
Speaker 1: own military. They're not They're in the habit of buying things,
Speaker 1: not donating right now. So I don't see that. I
Speaker 1: don't think anybody's coming to help Ukraine. So basically, at
Speaker 1: this point, Vladimir, I'm sorry putin himself, is he's seeing.
Speaker 2: The writing on the wall. We said at the beginning,
Speaker 2: and it's.
Speaker 1: A historical fact that Russia doesn't get involved in a
Speaker 1: military campaign and then go home until they have at
Speaker 1: least lost half a millillion men. That has been the
Speaker 1: standard since Peter the Great and arguably even before him.
Speaker 1: This they have lost way more, way more than that,
Speaker 1: And I understand it depending on the source that you
Speaker 1: look at, the numbers are going to be conflated. Nobody
Speaker 1: Ukraine is not giving us accurate numbers. Russia is not
Speaker 1: giving us accurate numbers. But going off of the satellite
Speaker 1: imagery that we have where you can see body count
Speaker 1: from a lot of these skirmishes and engagements, I don't
Speaker 1: think that that's a hot take to say that Russia
Speaker 1: has lost And I don't mean off the battlefield. Do
Speaker 1: lost a leg No, I mean like bodies in a bag,
Speaker 1: have lost well.
Speaker 2: Over half million people.
Speaker 1: And the last metrics that I saw from neutral sources
Speaker 1: said that Russia has lost three to one the amount
Speaker 1: that Ukraine has lost. And I understand that there's people
Speaker 1: that will disagree with that one as well. This twenty
Speaker 1: eight point plan, I haven't read it, and honestly, I
Speaker 1: thought this article was gonna work a little better for us.
Speaker 1: The option at the moment whenever Trump first got Lensky
Speaker 1: to come to the negotiation table was basically that America
Speaker 1: was going to set up mining operations as the border
Speaker 1: between Russia and Ukraine. Russia's not gonna step foot on
Speaker 1: an American mining company because now they're pissing in America's
Speaker 1: profit margins. And that's one of the metrics. That's one
Speaker 1: of the cardinal rules. Don't touch our boats and don't
Speaker 1: touch our business boats more than business. But the two
Speaker 1: aur interlinked on this one, so bear with me. If
Speaker 1: America was to set up a series of mining operations
Speaker 1: in that region, which does have a lot of rare
Speaker 1: earths and things, and we were able to get that
Speaker 1: for pennies on the dollar, it's a win win for everybody. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Russia has lost some land, but like, I'm sorry Ukraine,
Speaker 1: Ukraine's lost some land. You're not getting that lamb back.
Speaker 1: There's no way that that can happen. We have given
Speaker 1: Ukraine the ability to even reach out and touch Moscow.
Speaker 1: In the beginning, we capped them off for the knees
Speaker 1: and said you can't bomb anything that wasn't Ukrainian territory.
Speaker 1: A few years ago, then we said, okay, fine, now
Speaker 1: you can bomb some Russian territory just on the other
Speaker 1: side of the border.
Speaker 2: A few months ago.
Speaker 1: Trump's basically fine, you know what, send it to you
Speaker 1: to send it to Moscow.
Speaker 2: I don't care, Like, do whatever you gotta do to
Speaker 2: end this war. We're over it.
Speaker 1: They have had that type of off the leash carte
Speaker 1: blanchness for months and months and it's still not really
Speaker 1: making much happen here. So Yeah, if this twenty eight
Speaker 1: point plan does come through, I think Tony might be
Speaker 1: right and we might see peace by March, maybe even sooner.
Speaker 2: Maybe I don't. He said fifty to fifty that it
Speaker 2: would get wrapped up this month.
Speaker 1: I as of this moment, and this is very subject
Speaker 1: to change as of this moment, I don't see it
Speaker 1: happening this month. I could see it happening in the
Speaker 1: early weeks of January maybe, but a lot of people
Speaker 1: would have to take big old bites out of some
Speaker 1: big slices of humble pie. Zelenski is not the guy
Speaker 1: to do that. Putin is not the guy to do that.
Speaker 1: I don't know, honestly. It wouldn't shock me if this
Speaker 1: conflict went on for another like three years. But it
Speaker 1: also wouldn't shock me if this got situated and handled
Speaker 1: up before the new before the spring offensive can take off,
Speaker 1: right because now that we're entering into these winter months,
Speaker 1: the war has for the most part gone into a
Speaker 1: lull because this area of the world gets really cold,
Speaker 1: and nobody wants to fight in that level of cold,
Speaker 1: except for the Russian in the Ukrainians. But the land
Speaker 1: has got this permafrost going on. Once it starts melting,
Speaker 1: it turns into a sloppy mud pit, and then once
Speaker 1: it kind of dries up a bit, that's when we've
Speaker 1: gotten these massive spring offensive over the last few years.
Speaker 1: I am hoping that this whole situation gets done and
Speaker 1: over with before either side has the opportunity to launch
Speaker 1: a spring offensive. That being said, I could also see
Speaker 1: a ceasefire agreement getting signed here soon and then they
Speaker 1: both go back on it and launch a big spring
Speaker 1: offensive on each other anyway, and the war is back on.
Speaker 2: That also wouldn't shock me at this point.
Speaker 1: But anyway, as we have done on the Cajun night,
Speaker 1: I'm keeping my finger as much on the pulse as
Speaker 1: I can with Russia and Ukraine. So without any further ado,
Speaker 1: let's move on to the next topic.
Speaker 2: Here.
Speaker 1: Trump to release video of second strike on alleged drug boat.
Speaker 1: This is something that I'm seeing a lot of on
Speaker 1: the news right now. Haig Seth releases a statement basically
Speaker 1: saying kill them all, and the people are saying that
Speaker 1: this is a war crime. Now, because how do you
Speaker 1: know that these people on this boat weren't just civilians
Speaker 1: that were just trying to go from point A to
Speaker 1: point B. Then it's like, no, it's guaranteed this is
Speaker 1: a drug boat. These are people that are moving product
Speaker 1: for the cartel. Well, how do you know that these
Speaker 1: people's families aren't being held hostage and they are forced
Speaker 1: on this boat to do this? And this except for
Speaker 1: the fact that even Venezuelan sources say that there is
Speaker 1: at least five people on each of these boats, and
Speaker 1: every one of them is well paid and well trained.
Speaker 1: So like you have a navigator, you have you know, engineer,
Speaker 1: you have a couple of the like the crewmen, so
Speaker 1: to speak, and every one of them is being handsomely
Speaker 1: paid to move things from point A to point and B.
Speaker 1: None of these people on these boats, by Venezuela's own admission,
Speaker 1: I might add, are innocent civilians that were just in
Speaker 1: the wrong place at the wrong time. So heg Seth's
Speaker 1: statement about kill them all. It's not exactly as much
Speaker 1: of a quote unquote possible war crime as the media
Speaker 1: would have you believe. But you know, without further ado,
Speaker 1: we're gonna play this video, then we're gonna talk about
Speaker 1: it a little bit more in depth. This is from
Speaker 1: NBC News. Trump to release video of second strike on
Speaker 1: alleged drug.
Speaker 16: Boats, facing calls from Democrats to release more video of
Speaker 16: this controversial strike against an alleged cartel boat smuggling drugs
Speaker 16: into the US. Tonight, President Trump saying his administration would
Speaker 16: I don't.
Speaker 17: Know what they have, but whatever they have would certainly
Speaker 17: release no problem it comes.
Speaker 16: I mean, BIPARTI isn't backlash to that double tap air
Speaker 16: Strikezuela on September second. Two people survived the initial attack,
Speaker 16: but Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth yesterday told me he did
Speaker 16: not personally see the survivors and then moved on to
Speaker 16: another meeting, while Admiral Frank Bradley ordered a second strike
Speaker 16: that killed all on board.
Speaker 2: President Trump tonight, so to be clear, do you support.
Speaker 18: The decision to kill survivors after the end?
Speaker 7: No?
Speaker 17: I support the decision to knock out the boats, and
Speaker 17: whoever is piloting those boats most of them are gone.
Speaker 17: But whoever are piloting those votes, they guilty of trying
Speaker 17: to kill the people in our country.
Speaker 16: Also tonight, there's new scrutiny on a passage in Hexas
Speaker 16: twenty twenty four book where he described a briefing from
Speaker 16: lawyers to his troops in Iraq.
Speaker 1: Okay, we're going to play this, Oh the way that
Speaker 1: there's backlash on this book, this statement in this book,
Speaker 1: this one's got my hackles up a bit.
Speaker 2: Y'all tell me what y'all think about it.
Speaker 16: Here we go afterwards, telling his platoon to ignore legal
Speaker 16: advice that they could not shoot and kill an enemy
Speaker 16: combatant with a rocket propelled grenade unless it was pointed
Speaker 16: at them. Heckstath says he told them, I will not
Speaker 16: allow that nonsense to filter into your brains. Men, if
Speaker 16: you see an enemy who you believe is a threat,
Speaker 16: you engage and destroy the threat.
Speaker 1: Meanwhile, a new Okay, So basically he was saying that
Speaker 1: these new ros are bullshit. And if a dude's walking
Speaker 1: around with an RPG, he's not just walking around.
Speaker 2: With an RPG just to walk around with an RPG. Yeah,
Speaker 2: it was an AK.
Speaker 1: Sure, you got dudes with rifles slung all over Afghanistan.
Speaker 2: That's an RPG is kind of a step up.
Speaker 1: And if you think that this guy's a threat, take
Speaker 1: him out, like you know what I'm saying, Like that's fine,
Speaker 1: And uh yeah, apparently there's now lawyers saying that, Like,
Speaker 1: I can't believe he told his men to ignore the Roes.
Speaker 1: Those bullshit Roes got more guys killed than they saved,
Speaker 1: more of our guys killed than they saved, and they
Speaker 1: certainly didn't protect civilians either. Sam, go ahead, and also, Zombie,
Speaker 1: I would love for you to wait in on this
Speaker 1: one too.
Speaker 3: So it's a two part of one. I walked around
Speaker 3: with a fucking RPG. Just walk around on It's a
Speaker 3: fucking RPG. It's a great determine, sure.
Speaker 9: Second.
Speaker 3: Second off, fuck the I believe that politics should stay
Speaker 3: the fuck out of it. You can tell our boy,
Speaker 3: our boys, and our goals when to fight and where
Speaker 3: to fight. Don't fucking tell him how to fight. Your
Speaker 3: bullshit is the reason why so many of our boys
Speaker 3: didn't make it back home from fucking Vietnam. While my
Speaker 3: my uncle who had my my uncle Steven, and when
Speaker 3: he was over when he was overseats for his two
Speaker 3: to three toys over yonder, he has seen children get
Speaker 3: bombed to suicide, best strap to him, and unspeakable things happen.
Speaker 3: He's he didn't talk a lot about it, but it's
Speaker 3: he He lost his one of his best friends due
Speaker 3: to that bullshit.
Speaker 2: But there's a difference here.
Speaker 1: Walking around with an RPG on your back, fine, okay,
Speaker 1: walking around with an RPG and a satchel full of
Speaker 1: more rounds and you happen to be carrying it in
Speaker 1: your hand. Oh, I'm gonna go ahead and just call
Speaker 1: that a perceived threat.
Speaker 9: So do you shoot him. Would it be better to shoot.
Speaker 4: Him or shoot the equipment with the fifty?
Speaker 1: If you shoot him, then you could take that equipment
Speaker 1: and give it to the ANA guys. But the A
Speaker 1: and A, the Afghan Army, wow, they were allies of ours.
Speaker 1: They were helping us fight against the Taliban and al
Speaker 1: Kaieda and things.
Speaker 9: Are they still allies.
Speaker 1: Or oh no, No, we're talking about when he was
Speaker 1: deployed there, When our Secretary of War at one point
Speaker 1: was an officer over soldiers. It's different. Still, I'm sorry
Speaker 1: he was an n c O. I don't know if
Speaker 1: he actually got commissioned. I think he got out as
Speaker 1: a staff sergeant. I could be wrong, but yeah, anyway,
Speaker 1: all right, let's continue on this video here, and let's
Speaker 1: just let's just see what's up.
Speaker 16: Pentadon Inspector General a report finding the information heck Seth
Speaker 16: shared on a group's signal chat in March about appending
Speaker 16: military operation in Yemen was considered secret to people who
Speaker 16: have read the report tell NBC News, adding that had
Speaker 16: the information been intercepted by a foreign adversary, it would
Speaker 16: have imperiled American troops. The watchdog report delivered the Congress
Speaker 16: also concluded Henkseeth violated military regulations by using his personal
Speaker 16: phone for office business, though saying Hegxeth had the power
Speaker 16: to declassify intelligence. According to the sources who read the
Speaker 16: findings heave the Trump administrations.
Speaker 1: I find that interesting that they're trying to fry Hegseth
Speaker 1: for using his personal phone or whatever for work things. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: when Killery did it, they just kind of tried everything
Speaker 1: they could to push that under the rug. Right, she
Speaker 1: was using her personal email and there was like thirty
Speaker 1: thousand emails that she went through and hard wiped and
Speaker 1: all of these things after Benghazi, and.
Speaker 2: Like that was a problem. Nobody denied that that was
Speaker 2: an issue, but they just pushed it on the rug
Speaker 2: for her.
Speaker 1: But if heg Seth does it, oh, whoa, whoa, Now
Speaker 1: we can't have all that.
Speaker 2: Let's see, let's see.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna check the chat before we go to the
Speaker 1: next point of contention here. Royce wants the Jews. What's
Speaker 1: the Jews thoughts of NASCAR? That has nothing to do
Speaker 1: with what we're talking about, but now that it's been asked,
Speaker 1: now we must talk about it. Royce, what is the
Speaker 1: Jews opinion of NASCAR.
Speaker 7: So Jews, the royal we has no opinion. I don't know.
Speaker 7: I think to eat each their own. I mean there
Speaker 7: are Jews that like Nascar, Jews that like horse racing,
Speaker 7: or Jews that like footbologies like.
Speaker 9: I know israel I have it like an Israeli stock.
Speaker 1: Israel does not have a stock car racing like circuit
Speaker 1: if that's what you're asking.
Speaker 9: Yeah, do they have anything like NASCAR?
Speaker 2: Oh no, dude, no, no, no.
Speaker 12: We're not.
Speaker 7: Yeah, it's that's definitely not an Israeli thing.
Speaker 2: Could you do they have like big sporting events in Israel?
Speaker 2: They like.
Speaker 7: They do. They actually have a soccer team probably.
Speaker 1: I know they have a boo hurt team and they're
Speaker 1: actually they're they're pretty solid. I should throw that out.
Speaker 1: There is an armored combat team based out of Israel.
Speaker 1: They go to nationals every year. But uh, yeah, they
Speaker 1: have soccer. But even still, it's like they like to play.
Speaker 9: With play with balls with their feet.
Speaker 1: Huh, as most countries, every country on Earth. As a
Speaker 1: matter of fact, does they say that math is the
Speaker 1: international language? I call bullshit. You put a ball, a
Speaker 1: soccer ball, in the middle of a group of kids,
Speaker 1: no matter what corner of the world, you happen to
Speaker 1: find yourself in. I guarantee you, without speaking the language,
Speaker 1: everybody understands what time it is, everybody understands the rules,
Speaker 1: and they just take off. I believe soccer is actually
Speaker 1: the world's true international language.
Speaker 2: It's just my take.
Speaker 9: I would think, like in the international language.
Speaker 1: Uh okay, not an international negotiation piece. Yeah, I know,
Speaker 1: a gun in the face, most people understand that language.
Speaker 1: But I'm talking about just as far as, like you know,
Speaker 1: peace talks, peaceful things going on. I'm trying to teach
Speaker 1: this kid algebra. He may not understand I put a
Speaker 1: soccer ball in front of him. He fucking knows immediately.
Speaker 2: All right. So now let's move on.
Speaker 1: As we're talking about this boat that got bombed and
Speaker 1: double tap time might add apparently people are feeling some
Speaker 1: type of way about this. This is the as CoA
Speaker 1: the uh. Basically it's a tracking Trump and the Latin
Speaker 1: American security. So there's a few interesting things that I
Speaker 1: thought were worth mentioning, and this article brings up here
Speaker 1: Tracking Trump and Latin America Security. Trump pardons convicted Hondurian
Speaker 1: ex president. So as we're talking about some of the
Speaker 1: things going on with these Latin countries and Trump, you know,
Speaker 1: the mass deportations, the bombing of the boats, all the things.
Speaker 2: I think it's worth mentioning that we dive in on
Speaker 2: this one a bit.
Speaker 1: So, how is the US administration furthering its national security
Speaker 1: agenda in the Americas? From a boost in the US
Speaker 1: troop numbers at the US Mexico border to an increased
Speaker 1: military presence in the Southern Caribbean. Security policy concerning Latin
Speaker 1: America rests high on the agenda of the second Trump administration.
Speaker 1: Since he retook the reigns of the presidency, the US
Speaker 1: President Trump has focused on a marquee security goal in
Speaker 1: the Western Hemisphere, defeating drug cartels and other criminal groups.
Speaker 1: While campaigning back in December of twenty twenty three, he declared,
Speaker 1: the drug cartels are waging the war on America, and
Speaker 1: it's now time for America to wage war on the cartels.
Speaker 1: Since then, the Trump administration has leveraged both military might
Speaker 1: and legal tools such as terrorist designations to attempt to
Speaker 1: weaken organized crime groups. So, now here's the recent developments here.
Speaker 1: On December one this year, a couple of days ago,
Speaker 1: as a time for cording, Trump pardoned Freeze, convicted Hondurian
Speaker 1: ex president. On November twenty eighth, President Trump announced he
Speaker 1: would pardon former president of Honduras, Juan Orlando Hernandez of
Speaker 1: his forty five year drug trafficking sentence. The former president
Speaker 1: of Honduras had forty five years of drug trafficking under
Speaker 1: his belt, and Trump just pardoned him. In twenty twenty four,
Speaker 1: federal court in New York convicted him of accepting bribes
Speaker 1: from drug traffickers, protecting cartel members from extradition and prosecution,
Speaker 1: and moving at least four hundred tons of cocaine to
Speaker 1: the United States. Yeah, this guy was absolutely an ARCO president.
Speaker 1: His truth social postles also included a reiteration endorsement of
Speaker 1: the presidential candidate a Nasai Tito Asfura. Trump said Hernandez
Speaker 1: was treated very harshly and unfairly for forty five years.
Speaker 1: He took bribes, he protected cartel members, and he himself
Speaker 1: moved four hundred tons of coke and he was treated
Speaker 1: harston unfairly. Meanwhile, these drug cartels are terrorist organizations.
Speaker 2: That's funny.
Speaker 1: On December first, Hernandez was released from his prison cell
Speaker 1: in West Virginia. Senator Tim Kaine, a Democrat from Virginia
Speaker 1: who is the top Democrat in the state or in
Speaker 1: the Senate Foreign Relations, condemned the pardon. Of course he did,
Speaker 1: because if Trump's doing it, the Democrats have to go
Speaker 1: against it. But even still, as much as he's been
Speaker 1: ranting and raving about the cartels, it's crazy that he
Speaker 1: would pardon this guy. But all right, Hernandez was the
Speaker 1: leader of one of the largest criminal enterprises that has
Speaker 1: ever been subject to a conviction in the US courts,
Speaker 1: and less than one year into his sentence, Trump is
Speaker 1: pardoning him, Suggesting that Trump cares nothing about the narco trafficking,
Speaker 1: He says, I have to say, I kind of that
Speaker 1: stands to reason here, it really does. November twenty sixth,
Speaker 1: during heg SAS's visit the Democratic Republic, I'm sorry, the
Speaker 1: Dominican Republic. Excuse me, The grants the US access to
Speaker 1: military base. Okay, let's get into it here. Secretary of
Speaker 1: War Pete Hegseth made a one day trip to the
Speaker 1: dr on November twenty six where he met with President
Speaker 1: Louise abb Nator, who to announce a new bilateral military
Speaker 1: agreement the US Armed Forces will now have temporary access
Speaker 1: to restricted parts of a Dominican military air base and
Speaker 1: an international airport for the use of refueling and transportation
Speaker 1: of aircraft and personnel in the Caribbean at a time
Speaker 1: of heightened US tension in Venezuela. The move is the
Speaker 1: first major military cooperation agreement between the two countries. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I don't think I've ever actually heard of a Dominican
Speaker 1: Republic and US military allegiance.
Speaker 2: That's that's new.
Speaker 1: The press conference, Hecseth praised the Dominican Republic for its
Speaker 1: counter narcotics efforts.
Speaker 2: That's why we decided to come here first.
Speaker 1: Hecsas Saidican the Dominican Republic has stepped up. A day earlier,
Speaker 1: the Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, Dan Kine,
Speaker 1: met with Prime Minister of Trinidad and Tobago Kamla Persad
Speaker 1: Bessessor Okay to discuss security. The Prime Minister confirmed days
Speaker 1: later that the U US military and sought a radar
Speaker 1: system on the island of Tobago.
Speaker 2: All right.
Speaker 1: November twenty fourth, US government designates Cartel de la Souls
Speaker 1: as a terrorist group. Well, I mean they are Cartel
Speaker 1: and Trump was very clear that all cartels are now
Speaker 1: designated as terrorist groups. The US government officially designated Cartel
Speaker 1: de la Souls as a foreign terrorist organization, a legend
Speaker 1: that the group is run by the regime of Nicholas
Speaker 1: Maduro and collaborates with the Sinaloa Cartel and the Trende Rawa. Experts, however,
Speaker 1: have rejected the Trump administration's categorization of the Cartel de
Speaker 1: la Souls, saying it's less of a formalized group with
Speaker 1: a command structure is and more of a shorthand term
Speaker 1: for a highly corrupt network within Venezuela's armed forces engaging
Speaker 1: in drug smuggling. I I'm sorry, all right, time out, Timeout,
Speaker 1: time out. Cartel de la Souls means Cartel of the
Speaker 1: Sun or the Sun Cartel. Members of this group acknowledge
Speaker 1: that they are working for Maduro. There's direct quotes from
Speaker 1: people that have been arrested that acknowledge that they are
Speaker 1: a part of this Sun cartel, and they all say
Speaker 1: they work for Nicholas Maduro, the president of Venezuela. So
Speaker 1: with that being said, they are acknowledging that, and the
Speaker 1: people the experts quote unquote are rejecting that the Trump
Speaker 1: administration should acknowledge them to be a foreign terrorist organization
Speaker 1: even though they acknowledge that this is a highly corrupt
Speaker 1: network within Venezuela's armed forces engaged in drug smuggling. This like,
Speaker 1: I don't know, I feel like I'm losing brain cells
Speaker 1: reading that out loud. That's that's calling it a cartel
Speaker 1: without calling it a cartel, even though the Sun cartel
Speaker 1: is that's what they're called.
Speaker 2: So you know, Sam, go ahead.
Speaker 8: Yeah, So, dude, essentially old Pablo Esketball better than Pablo
Speaker 8: Esketball because Pablosketball wanted to become a presidente o Publica
Speaker 8: of Colombia when all in reality all he get he
Speaker 8: got mostly was a congressman.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, and that's the deal.
Speaker 1: A lot of them have learned from Escobar's mistakes and
Speaker 1: how to do it the right way, which is why
Speaker 1: you have so many cartel placed leaders in all the
Speaker 1: Latin American countries.
Speaker 2: And hell, look at the president of Mexico. That's a
Speaker 2: prime example.
Speaker 9: Isn't she Jewish?
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 1: I don't know, but I do know that there was
Speaker 1: thirty two assassinations before she was selected for the election.
Speaker 1: Pretty much anybody that had their name on the ballot
Speaker 1: before her got.
Speaker 3: Got Also, if Pablo when he they showed his mug
Speaker 3: shot and everything in Congress, when he stepped out, he
Speaker 3: stood up and stepped out, and that's when.
Speaker 9: He blew the plane up and everything.
Speaker 3: If he would have just said, hey, oh yes, I
Speaker 3: made mistakes when I was younger, but I learned from
Speaker 3: my mistake because I'm a changed man, he would have
Speaker 3: been lying through his fucking teeth. But they would have
Speaker 3: more like that, Oh okay, well, sit down, tongreissman. They
Speaker 3: wouldn't have had all the fire and everything, because the
Speaker 3: retaliation that he did is what that guy he made
Speaker 3: him from going from becoming just a narco to a
Speaker 3: narco terrorist. And Columbia and majority of the South America
Speaker 3: are techniquely narco terrorist states.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, it's uh no, I agree, and they still
Speaker 1: are to this day, which is why Trump is going
Speaker 1: at it as hard as he is. Right now, Let's see, eh,
Speaker 1: we don't really need to read the entire thing. This
Speaker 1: is actually a pretty comprehensive list of what all is
Speaker 1: transpired in Central America and the Caribbean over the last
Speaker 1: few months. It's like a day by day tracker of it,
Speaker 1: which is interesting. But yeah, as much as Trump is
Speaker 1: ranting and raving about the war on the cartels, I
Speaker 1: find it odd that he still gives the obvious cartel affiliate.
Speaker 1: We're a prime minister of Hondurasa. Pardon it's very strange anyway,
Speaker 1: all right, moving on, this is going to be semi
Speaker 1: in the conspiratorial conversation, but also very much a part
Speaker 1: of the conversation that.
Speaker 2: I believe needs to be had. So let's dive into it.
Speaker 5: Here.
Speaker 1: From Jamie Demian or from Jamie Diamond to Bill Ackman,
Speaker 1: Wall Street's billionaires are now changing their tune and offering
Speaker 1: to help zoron Mom Donnie. This is an article from
Speaker 1: about a month ago, but I also find it to
Speaker 1: be very interesting. Basically, the Wall Street elites who were
Speaker 1: so against Mom Donnie in the beginning for obvious reasons,
Speaker 1: he is, by his own admission, a socialist and that's
Speaker 1: not good for anybody. They also are acknowledging that, you know,
Speaker 1: maybe we can work with the socialist guy, Zoron Mom Donnie,
Speaker 1: who ran his campaign on tackling the cost of living
Speaker 1: through the policies like city run groceries, free public transit,
Speaker 1: and universal childcare. Was declared the next mayor of the
Speaker 1: US's largest city on Tuesday, and some of the billionaires
Speaker 1: who previously opposed him are changing their tune. So a
Speaker 1: lot of these Wall Street billionaire types, the the Donald
Speaker 1: Trumps before he was president, like his people, you know,
Speaker 1: his his brand of grease balls, they have all of
Speaker 1: a sudden decided that they are not They're not fully
Speaker 1: thrown in there a lot with Mom Donnie by any means.
Speaker 1: But I think that they understand how socialism works. It's
Speaker 1: it's on the surface, it's like the there is no
Speaker 1: haves and have nots, everybody's equaling all of that.
Speaker 2: But that's not how it actually works.
Speaker 1: Right, there's the there's the image of Marxism, and then
Speaker 1: there's the reality of Marxism. And they understand that if
Speaker 1: they play their cards right with this guy, they could
Speaker 1: become even higher up and wealthy er one percent of
Speaker 1: the one percent, and probably for pennies on the dollar.
Speaker 2: They don't have to go through bureaucratic chains and things.
Speaker 1: They could just cut him a check of a bribe
Speaker 1: and get whatever approved they need to get approved. You know,
Speaker 1: it's so I think it's interesting, and especially now that
Speaker 1: Mom Donnie and Trump have had their meeting, and apparently Trump,
Speaker 1: I'm not saying he's a supporter of Mom Donnie, but
Speaker 1: he absolutely seemed a lot more cordial than what people
Speaker 1: felt comfortable with. Couple that with Mom Donnie making a
Speaker 1: lot of new friends on Wall Street.
Speaker 2: It's interesting. It's very interesting, and we'll see how New
Speaker 2: York City changes.
Speaker 1: If it changes, it might have all just been campaign
Speaker 1: promises and Homeboy is not gonna be able to make
Speaker 1: anything actually happen because he's gonna get hit with red
Speaker 1: tape within red tape, with red tape as a side.
Speaker 1: I don't know. We're gonna see how that one plays out.
Speaker 1: But anyway, moving on, we'll get it out of that one.
Speaker 1: Let's go to this Guardian article here politicians shocked by
Speaker 1: Marjorie Taylor Green's surprise resignation announcement.
Speaker 2: God speaking is difficult right now.
Speaker 1: Some Republicans offered congressmen and plaudits, but AOC, she was
Speaker 1: scathing in her dismissal of her frequent sparring partner. Yeah,
Speaker 1: of course AOC would have one more dig for her
Speaker 1: out the door. And we've talked about this a couple
Speaker 1: of times over the past week or two. But here's
Speaker 1: the deal. Marjorie Taylor Green's surprise resignation from Congress late
Speaker 1: on Friday, saying she refused to be a battered wife
Speaker 1: quote unquote following her public fallout with Donald Trump has
Speaker 1: been slammed by AOC, the Democratic congresswoman and Green's frequent
Speaker 1: sparring partner, and also raging idiot and kant extraordinary. She's
Speaker 1: carefully timing her departure just one to two days after
Speaker 1: her pinching kicks in Okazo, Cortes said in a statement
Speaker 1: on her Instagram account, and criticized her voting record on healthcare.
Speaker 2: Of course she did.
Speaker 1: Green abruptly resigned from Congress effective the fifth of January,
Speaker 1: in a ten minute video post outlining her unhappiness with
Speaker 1: the Republicans on issues including the public release of the
Speaker 1: Epstein files, in the government's possession, US financing a foreign conflicts,
Speaker 1: Trump's decision to potentially back a candidate against her, and
Speaker 1: the living in healthcare. Yeah, that was another thing too.
Speaker 1: Trump started calling her, you know, Marjorie Trader Green because
Speaker 1: she started looking at things more critically and saying like Hey,
Speaker 1: you said you were gonna do this when you were
Speaker 1: on the campaign trail.
Speaker 2: It's time to deliver.
Speaker 1: And a major proponent of that has been healthcare, but
Speaker 1: the biggest one, I think has been.
Speaker 2: The Epstein files.
Speaker 1: She has been like a very massive proponent of releasing
Speaker 1: these files. Only recently did the rest of the politicians
Speaker 1: actually vote on this, and then Trump begrudgingly says that yes.
Speaker 2: Fine, will release it.
Speaker 1: It's gonna It's not gonna get released, not in the
Speaker 1: way that people think it is, honestly, And now that
Speaker 1: I know that Trump orders his steake well done, I
Speaker 1: know why.
Speaker 2: He doesn't want it released obviously.
Speaker 1: But anyway, so, yeah, Marjorie Taylor Green, she is stepping down,
Speaker 1: which at first, yeah, that sucks. I like her personally,
Speaker 1: and I do believe that she will be making a
Speaker 1: run for governor or some sort of state politician. She
Speaker 1: may make her run into the federal side of things
Speaker 1: at a later time, but as of now, I can
Speaker 1: see her going She's from Georgia, if I'm not mistaken,
Speaker 1: I could see her going back home and running for
Speaker 1: state governor or something along these lines and killing it.
Speaker 3: Honestly, she put she would because mostly because Bryan you
Speaker 3: uh so Georgia, you can only be uh you can
Speaker 3: only be governor twice. Now you can only do two terms.
Speaker 3: And Brian camp is on his second, he's on his
Speaker 3: last term. But which he's actually the reason why, Uh
Speaker 3: we have the twenty eighteen Farm Bill and everything that
Speaker 3: led to us have THHC and all but which he
Speaker 3: signed it in and he just signed it out.
Speaker 9: He just outlawed THHCA and everything.
Speaker 3: But she's trying to if I'm not mistaken, she's talking
Speaker 3: about trying to reverse it and legalize the whole plant good,
Speaker 3: which it and I my only thing is, at this
Speaker 3: point in time, why don't we just federally legalize it again? Well,
Speaker 3: I say again, because there to become illegal, it must
Speaker 3: first be legal, then it becomes illegal.
Speaker 2: Right right. And I don't know her take on on
Speaker 2: weed itself.
Speaker 1: I hope that more and more states and federally just
Speaker 1: decriminalize and then make it fully legal. But I mean,
Speaker 1: it's it's one of those things. But yeah, as far
Speaker 1: as the whole her stepping down goes, Trump's been a
Speaker 1: dickhead to her for weeks.
Speaker 3: Well, keep in mind, he's what a seventy year seventy
Speaker 3: eighty something year old man.
Speaker 2: I think, yeah, so.
Speaker 3: I'm not I'm not defending the man. I don't trust him,
Speaker 3: don't know him, don't really give a fuck about him.
Speaker 3: But he does come from a generation that believes women
Speaker 3: are to be seen, not her.
Speaker 2: Right. And it's not like that's an excuse.
Speaker 3: And the reason why and I'm pretty sure last reason
Speaker 3: why he got divorced so many damn times.
Speaker 1: Actually, if you look at the track record, every time
Speaker 1: he took a new wife, it was the woman that
Speaker 1: he was cheating on his former wife with.
Speaker 2: That's that's a fake.
Speaker 3: Doesn't he have his second like his second life buried
Speaker 3: on his golf course, so that he can never be
Speaker 3: taken from him? And like his family, because I know,
Speaker 3: if you say it, you die, you can get buried
Speaker 3: on your family plot and it will be gone.
Speaker 9: It will stay in your family.
Speaker 1: For that depends on the state, that really does. I've
Speaker 1: seen family of states with family plots on it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that plot where the bodies are buried, that that actual
Speaker 1: square footage might stay your family's property, but uh, the.
Speaker 2: Rest of the acre.
Speaker 1: It's like if you have one hundred acre farm and
Speaker 1: maybe half an acre is dedicated to your family plot.
Speaker 1: Your family can keep that half acre, but they can
Speaker 1: absolutely foreclose on the rest of it. But that's also
Speaker 1: I think that very state to state to be honest
Speaker 1: with you.
Speaker 2: But I don't know.
Speaker 1: Yeah, So anyway, Marjorie Taylor Green, she stepped down. With
Speaker 1: Marjorie Taylor Green stepping down. There's a lot of controversy
Speaker 1: going on in DC right now, and we did do
Speaker 1: an episode on the cult conspiracy talking about the Somalia
Speaker 1: issues in Minnesota. Now, Governor Walls, who was Kamala Harris's running.
Speaker 2: Mate because that was a good idea, he has.
Speaker 1: Now come under fire for allowing Minnesota to get over
Speaker 1: ram with the Somalian corruption that was funding al Shabab
Speaker 1: and al Qaeda group.
Speaker 2: Listen to this from Fox Business.
Speaker 19: Hundreds of state workers at the Minnesota Department of Human
Speaker 19: Services publicly excoriated Governor Tim Walts for allowing a quote
Speaker 19: massive fraud scandal to unfold under his watch and retaliating
Speaker 19: against they're whistleblowers, the ex account, which represents over four
Speaker 19: hundred and eighty staffers at that department, saying quote Tim
Speaker 19: Waltz is one hundred percent responsible for mass of fraud
Speaker 19: in Minnesota. We will let Tim Waltz do a fraud
Speaker 19: early on, hoping for a partnership and stopping fraud. But no,
Speaker 19: we got the opposite response, while systematically it retaliated against
Speaker 19: the whistleblowers, using monitoring threats, repression, and did his best
Speaker 19: to discredit fraud reports. This as a group of Minnesota
Speaker 19: state government employees wrote to former Vice President Harris and
Speaker 19: the DNC multiple times warning them about governor walls and
Speaker 19: what they described as is incompetence, fraud, scandals, and retaliation.
Speaker 7: Here's what they said.
Speaker 19: We tried our best to keep the public informed, as
Speaker 19: our tweets are public. Maybe Kamalo turned a blind eye
Speaker 19: to fraud like her running mate. Over the years, our
Speaker 19: messages have not changed. We need fraud to stop in
Speaker 19: Minnesota and good governance.
Speaker 7: To be restored.
Speaker 19: Minnesota is currently at the center of a widening fraud scandal.
Speaker 19: Federal prosecutors continue to unravel this one of the nation's
Speaker 19: largest COVID era fraud cases. So what happened here, Chris?
Speaker 19: Is that really going back to the COVID days, There's
Speaker 19: this agency, the Minnesota Medicaid Housing Stabilization Services Fund. There's
Speaker 19: also another one feeding our future. Basically, the allegations are
Speaker 19: is that all of this money was going was being
Speaker 19: stolen by those in the Samala community in the Twin Cities,
Speaker 19: and it was going back to Somalia. They were funneling
Speaker 19: it and then it was hitting up in the hands
Speaker 19: of All Shabab, which is a designated terrorist organization.
Speaker 14: Right, And so I did not have Minnesota's welfare funds
Speaker 14: going to terrorist organizations on my BINGO card. And that's
Speaker 14: what is so frustrating about all this because we knew
Speaker 14: Tim Waltz was a disastrous VP candidate. He's a dork,
Speaker 14: he's very annoying. He's supposed to be this every man
Speaker 14: but doesn't know he's smart, not very bright, as the
Speaker 14: President used a different word for that. But the oppo,
Speaker 14: the research that should have been done during the campaign.
Speaker 2: Should have brought this up.
Speaker 14: This is a huge bombshell that not only does he
Speaker 14: have all those negative characteristics. Oh, by the way, his
Speaker 14: government was also funding terrorists and al Shabab and some
Speaker 14: that should have been devastating for the Harris Waltz campaign.
Speaker 18: It could be we could be talking about.
Speaker 19: A billion dollars potentially, and the first The first time
Speaker 19: I saw this yesterday was Treasury Secretary Scott Bessett actually
Speaker 19: posting about it. This is weird to investigation. I mean,
Speaker 19: this is millions and millions of dollars coming from taxpayers
Speaker 19: going to this terrorist well, even allegedly.
Speaker 20: Yeah, even the New York Times, which as we know,
Speaker 20: is typically very friendly to Democrats, leading with an article quote,
Speaker 20: ow fraud swamped Minnesota social services system.
Speaker 2: On Tim Wall's watch.
Speaker 20: If you remember, as soon as the Harris campaign named
Speaker 20: him as a running mate, his family came out. Remember
Speaker 20: the Waltz family against Waltz. There were fifteen of them.
Speaker 20: They had sweatshirts made. They said, no, he's a bad guy.
Speaker 20: You don't want you don't want him as number two
Speaker 20: in this country.
Speaker 2: And here we are. It's all yeah.
Speaker 1: And then let's also keep in mind, right, the whole
Speaker 1: the US tax dollars going to fund terrorist groups. Keep
Speaker 1: in mind Biden sent I ran six billion dollars that
Speaker 1: no one asked for, like at all, Right, there was
Speaker 1: like a prisoner exchange that nobody asked for. And then
Speaker 1: on top of that he sent them six billion dollars.
Speaker 2: Is like a sweetener.
Speaker 1: Interesting how that money made its way to dare I
Speaker 1: say it Gaza to fund the October situation and all
Speaker 1: of that. So again, US tax dollars going to fund
Speaker 1: terrorist organizations, that's nothing new. Having it funneled through nonprofits
Speaker 1: and then making its way to terrorist organizations.
Speaker 2: That's a new take.
Speaker 1: That's that's actually I'm not impressed by it by any means,
Speaker 1: but I agree with the gentleman. I didn't exactly have
Speaker 1: that on my BINGO card for this year, but yeah,
Speaker 1: that's absolutely a thing that was taking place.
Speaker 2: But anyway, it's wild.
Speaker 1: Now with all that being said, we're talking about Marjor
Speaker 1: Taylor Green stepping down, and now congressional retrons are on
Speaker 1: a record breaking pace ahead of the twenty twenty.
Speaker 2: Six mid terms.
Speaker 1: There is all kinds of congress people that are getting
Speaker 1: ready to step down. I find that to be very
Speaker 1: interesting for two reasons. One, that's a job that you
Speaker 1: could stay in for your entire career.
Speaker 2: Right, That's how we have eighty four year old, you know,
Speaker 2: eighty eight year old.
Speaker 1: People that still hold a political position and are trying
Speaker 1: to like grill Mark Zuckerberg about now when to wi
Speaker 1: FI is on?
Speaker 2: Can can the facebooks see.
Speaker 1: Me through the Wi Fi and it's like, bro, what
Speaker 1: it gets tund to go home? But these people still
Speaker 1: hold their position for some reason, and that's acceptable behavior.
Speaker 1: So on one hand, I thought it was maybe we're
Speaker 1: getting out with the old and in with the new
Speaker 1: and all of these things. That's not the case. I
Speaker 1: personally believe that it's a two part one. A lot
Speaker 1: of people, both.
Speaker 2: Republican and Democrat, are not happy with the current ministry.
Speaker 1: They're not happy with the way DC is turning right now,
Speaker 1: and I can understand that.
Speaker 2: I can appreciate it.
Speaker 1: The other side of this is if massive if the
Speaker 1: Epstein files are about to be released, hypothetically, let's say
Speaker 1: that it actually does happen, they actually have this file
Speaker 1: get released. Actual names are gonna be brought up. It's
Speaker 1: not going to be so redacted that we don't know
Speaker 1: anything about anything. It also is very interesting to me
Speaker 1: that all of these people are getting ready to retire.
Speaker 2: I would be I feel like we're not going.
Speaker 1: To be surprised when we see these people also just
Speaker 1: take up residency in Greece or some other country that
Speaker 1: doesn't have extradition. I don't know that for a fact.
Speaker 1: That's just my conspiratorial brain speaking, But let's get into
Speaker 1: it here. The precise number of congressional retirement announcements is
Speaker 1: a little tricky because of the details. Some members have
Speaker 1: said they're in their political careers, while others are giving
Speaker 1: up their seats to pursue other offices. Some members have
Speaker 1: already resigned in the middle of their terms or are
Speaker 1: poised to do so, while other members died during their
Speaker 1: current term. In a couple of instances this year, we've
Speaker 1: seen incumbent lawmakers step down in order to serve in
Speaker 1: the Trump administration. Which that's different, right, Like, that's absolutely
Speaker 1: the thing that we see people do from time to time.
Speaker 1: Or you know, whoever is the president, he might want
Speaker 1: to bring somebody who want to be a part of.
Speaker 2: His staff, so they'll step away from their congressional role
Speaker 2: or whatever.
Speaker 1: All things considered, we're looking at a Capitol Hill landscape
Speaker 1: in which roughly fifty one members are giving up their
Speaker 1: seats or have already done.
Speaker 2: So. This is an NPR reporting.
Speaker 1: Like we said, the number of Congression lawmakers who do
Speaker 1: not plan to run for reelection in their current seats
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty six currently stands at ten Senators and
Speaker 1: forty one House members. There are twenty two retiring from
Speaker 1: public office, with the rest running for a different office,
Speaker 1: sixteen looking to become governor of their state, twelve looking
Speaker 1: to make the jump from House to Senate, and one
Speaker 1: Texas Representative, Republican Chip Roy is looking to become his
Speaker 1: state's attorney general. There are more Republicans signaling their desire
Speaker 1: to exit Washington twenty eight of them than Democrat twenty three.
Speaker 1: That's not leaps and bounds more by any means, that's
Speaker 1: pretty close to the same number. But even still, this
Speaker 1: many trying to leave their positions all at the same time.
Speaker 2: That's unprecedented.
Speaker 1: Honestly, in the abstract, those numbers might not sound especially significant,
Speaker 1: but it's worth keeping the broader context in mind. An
Speaker 1: analysis from the down ballot found that House retirements are
Speaker 1: currently on record setting pace ahead of the twenty twenty
Speaker 1: six midterm elections. Note that this analysis was done shortly
Speaker 1: before Friday night, when the Republican Representative Margie Taylor Green
Speaker 1: of Georgia announced her looming resignation. Soon after, punch Bowl
Speaker 1: News reported that other GOP members are also eyeing early exits,
Speaker 1: not because they have other jobs lined up, but because
Speaker 1: conditions on Capitol Hill have deteriorated a to a stunning degree.
Speaker 1: In early August, the Washington Post highlighted the slow congressional
Speaker 1: retirement season. As November nears its end, such commentary has
Speaker 1: quickly evaporated because, you know, certain journalists have no.
Speaker 2: Clue what they're talking about.
Speaker 1: A variety of factors have contributed to the broader dynamic
Speaker 1: Republican leader surrendering many of their powers to the White House,
Speaker 1: historical trends suggesting GOP is likely to struggle in Donald
Speaker 1: Trump's sixth year mid terms, et cetera.
Speaker 2: But the bottom line remains the same.
Speaker 1: A whole lot of federal lawmakers aren't satisfied with the
Speaker 1: status quo in Congress, so they're making significant changes. I
Speaker 1: think this is all very interesting, Sam, before we play
Speaker 1: the video, what you got?
Speaker 17: Yeah?
Speaker 3: Sorry, I ended up losing my training and so I'm
Speaker 3: actually about to get ready.
Speaker 2: To go to my cousins. Oh are you good? Brother?
Speaker 3: If you do think about it, Yeah, I was gonna.
Speaker 4: I was gonna say, it's funny.
Speaker 3: We have term limits for the president and we have
Speaker 3: age requirements of the president.
Speaker 9: Why is it?
Speaker 3: Why do we have the president but we don't have
Speaker 3: that for Congress, for Senate, and I even say we
Speaker 3: should have it all the way down to our local government,
Speaker 3: that everything should be two times.
Speaker 2: I agree. I agree.
Speaker 3: I also believe that if you're over, if you're over
Speaker 3: seventy nine, you should no longer be in a politics
Speaker 3: like you. I don't care if that's presidents or what.
Speaker 3: After a certain age, about the age of retirement, you
Speaker 3: can no longer hold any position.
Speaker 1: I'll put it like this, if you had to have
Speaker 1: your license be taken from you because you're unsafe to drive,
Speaker 1: I don't think you should be running for office exactly,
Speaker 1: and you know not because of like being blind or
Speaker 1: physically impaired. I mean, if you're actually so old that
Speaker 1: they can't trust your senile ass on the road, then
Speaker 1: why do we want you voting on our behalf.
Speaker 2: That's just me.
Speaker 3: I believe that we should listen to our elders, but
Speaker 3: for their life, their life experience.
Speaker 2: For sure.
Speaker 7: Well.
Speaker 3: I also believe that, hey, you've had your time in
Speaker 3: the sun. How about you lay down and enjoy the
Speaker 3: pasture while.
Speaker 4: We get shipped done?
Speaker 7: You know what I mean?
Speaker 4: Yeah, And I'm sorry for my language.
Speaker 9: I just.
Speaker 3: I cannot stand like I love America, I love my country.
Speaker 3: I fucking hate our government.
Speaker 2: Uh yeah, same.
Speaker 1: And honestly, it's not just because of the boomers, although
Speaker 1: they're the ones that ruin this country, like in every way,
Speaker 1: shape and form. But it's time for a newer generation
Speaker 1: to start making their way into DC. And thankfully there
Speaker 1: are a lot of younger I'm not going to say
Speaker 1: like kids, but younger generations that are starting to put
Speaker 1: their name out there and try to go against the incumbents.
Speaker 2: I hope that that actually takes one.
Speaker 1: That would be one, absolutely all of them. But I
Speaker 1: mean even there's multiple across the states where it's these
Speaker 1: younger people that are making their presence known in DC.
Speaker 1: Some of them I don't like, like, for instance, AOC,
Speaker 1: she's a younger one. I can't stand her. However, I
Speaker 1: am happy that a young she no, no, no, she
Speaker 1: put her way through college by bartending.
Speaker 4: I thought she failed out of college, not.
Speaker 1: To my knowledge, but I mean it's not like she
Speaker 1: was like a star student by any means either. And
Speaker 1: then depending on who she's around, she claims that she's
Speaker 1: from the Bronx, or she claims that she's a hood girl,
Speaker 1: and all this. She grew up in the suburbs of
Speaker 1: relatively privileged life, and she tries to make it seem
Speaker 1: like she's from the trenches, you know, out there in
Speaker 1: them streets and things, and it's it's ridiculous.
Speaker 3: Right, you can say from somewhere, but if you're actually
Speaker 3: from a place that is quote unquote dangerous or whatever,
Speaker 3: you're gonna have the walk. And when I say that,
Speaker 3: I'm not. I'm like, your eyes are gonna shift, You're
Speaker 3: gonna walk a certain way, You're gonna move a certain
Speaker 3: way like that goal she walks pum and proper.
Speaker 1: No, that chick's got such big old bug eyes. Dude,
Speaker 1: you'd be able to tell if her eyes were shifting
Speaker 1: the checker six.
Speaker 2: Now she's not. She's she's completely.
Speaker 3: Both her and cash Betail look like they uh they
Speaker 3: like the powder, you know, buddies. I could see them
Speaker 3: both doing a line of cocaine off with a toilet seat.
Speaker 2: I could see it.
Speaker 1: I really could, to be honest with you, all right,
Speaker 1: So now let's play this. Uh this is from w
Speaker 1: e n Y TV News. Let's hear what they have
Speaker 1: to say about the retirement announcements. The early resignations and
Speaker 1: the infighting that's looming over Congress.
Speaker 18: Productivity and compromiser is sometimes hard to find in Washington,
Speaker 18: but in recent weeks it's been nearly impossible. Members on
Speaker 18: both sides of the aisle feeling frustrated. It is made
Speaker 18: clear by dozens of retirement announcements, even a surprise resignation
Speaker 18: by a close Trump ally wan Y Washington, corresponded Brendan Scanlon,
Speaker 18: it's live on Capitol Hill with new details tonight.
Speaker 7: Good evening, Brendan, Hey, there were not a good evening.
Speaker 21: Yeah, you know, these partisan attacks and even party infighting
Speaker 21: on Capitol Hill is really nothing new, but recent events
Speaker 21: suggest that it could be reaching a tipping point. Within
Speaker 21: the last few weeks alone, we've seen a record breaking
Speaker 21: government shut down, an unsanctioned push from rank and file
Speaker 21: members to release the Epstein files, numerous censure votes to
Speaker 21: punish lawmakers for their actions, a surprise early resignation from
Speaker 21: Marjorie Taylor Green, and dozens of retirements after this current term.
Speaker 21: In a four page letter announcing her retirement, Marjorie Taylor
Speaker 21: Green ripped into Republicans and President Trump, essentially saying that
Speaker 21: they've abandoned GOP priorities and campaign promises. After Green's announcement,
Speaker 21: punch Bowl News first reported last week that other House
Speaker 21: Republicans are also considering retiring in the middle of the term.
Speaker 21: In the article, a senior House Republican told punch Bowl News, quote,
Speaker 21: more explosive early resignations are coming.
Speaker 5: It's a tinderbox end quote.
Speaker 21: Sources I've spoken with told me they too expect more
Speaker 21: House Republicans could soon call it quits. But the big
Speaker 21: questions are really how many and when. If just a
Speaker 21: handful of Republicans following Green's footsteps and decide to leave
Speaker 21: before the end of their term, that can have really
Speaker 21: big consequences on the Republicans already razor thin House majority.
Speaker 21: I had an opportunity to ask Press Secretary Caroline Levitt
Speaker 21: if the President was concerned about more early resignations and
Speaker 21: the reported unrest among some House Republicans. The President have
Speaker 21: any concerns in light of those reports about other House
Speaker 21: Republicans potentially leaving early, as well as the other announced
Speaker 21: retirements that we saw in the last couple of days.
Speaker 22: Look, I think the President maintains very good relationships with
Speaker 22: the vast majority, maybe with the exception of one or two,
Speaker 22: and I think many in this room know who I'm
Speaker 22: referring to. Very good relationships with members of Capitol Hill
Speaker 22: within the Republican Party, and the President clearly is the
Speaker 22: unequivocal leader of the Republican Party. And of course we
Speaker 22: have a very slim margin in the House, and the
Speaker 22: President wants that to continue.
Speaker 7: And renata.
Speaker 21: Over the weekend, Republican Congressman Troy Nils from Texas announced
Speaker 21: that he would not be seeking reelection and plans to
Speaker 21: retire at the end of this current term. He is
Speaker 21: one of more than two dozen House Republicans who plan
Speaker 21: to retire at the end of the term, and at
Speaker 21: least twenty House Democrats who plan to do the same
Speaker 21: in twenty twenty six.
Speaker 1: Now, all that being said, I am very interested to
Speaker 1: see what's going to take place hypothetically and probably.
Speaker 2: More probably, I.
Speaker 1: Think these Republican seats are going to be replaced by
Speaker 1: more Republicans. The Democrats seats are going to be replaced
Speaker 1: by newer Democrats.
Speaker 2: Fine, but that's not a.
Speaker 1: Guarantee, right, And if there is that many seats that
Speaker 1: are going to be you know, voted on, we might
Speaker 1: actually see a massive shift take place as far as
Speaker 1: how things get passed and voted up or down in
Speaker 1: DC on Capitol Hill.
Speaker 2: So I do think that's rather fascinating.
Speaker 1: So we're gonna keep our our eyes open for what's
Speaker 1: to transpire over the next year or so.
Speaker 2: So many of these people are changing jobs and everything else.
Speaker 1: Now, off of the politics and all the things and
Speaker 1: the stuff, let's talk about some AI. Let's talk about
Speaker 1: some some things that are going down here.
Speaker 2: This is from Wired dot com.
Speaker 1: Open ai locks down San Francisco offices following an alleged
Speaker 1: threat from activists. A message on open AI's internal slack
Speaker 1: claimed the activist in question had expressed interest in quote
Speaker 1: causing physical harm to open ai employees. Yeah, yeah, let's
Speaker 1: get into it here. Open ai employees in San Francisco
Speaker 1: were told to stay inside the office on Friday afternoon
Speaker 1: after the company purportedly received a threat from an individual
Speaker 1: who was previously associated with the stop AI activist group.
Speaker 1: I didn't know there was an activist group called staff AI.
Speaker 1: That's interesting. Although I don't believe that you should be
Speaker 1: like causing physical harm to people that work at AI offices.
Speaker 1: That's a bit that's extreme. That's ridiculous, but all right.
Speaker 1: Our information indicates that blank name from stop AI has
Speaker 1: expressed interest in causing physical harm to open ai employees,
Speaker 1: and a member of the internal communications team wrote on
Speaker 1: Slack he has previously been on site at our San
Speaker 1: Francisco facilities. Just before eleven am, San Francisco police received
Speaker 1: a nine to one one call about a man allegedly
Speaker 1: making threats and intending to harm others at the five
Speaker 1: point fifty Terry Francois Boulevard, which is near open AI's
Speaker 1: office in the Mission Bay neighborhood. According to the data
Speaker 1: track by the crime app Citizen, a police scanner recorded
Speaker 1: archived in the app described that the suspect by name
Speaker 1: alleges he may have purchased weapons with the intention of
Speaker 1: targeting additional open ai locations good night hours before the incident.
Speaker 1: On Friday, the individual who police flagged as allegedly making
Speaker 1: the threats said that he was no longer a part
Speaker 1: of stop AI in.
Speaker 2: A post on social media.
Speaker 1: In a statement to Wired, which is subsequently posted on
Speaker 1: x stop AI disavowed the alleged actions of the individual
Speaker 1: and said the organization is.
Speaker 2: Deeply committed to nonviolence. Okay.
Speaker 1: Wired reached out to the man in question, but did
Speaker 1: not immediately receive a response. San Francisco police did not
Speaker 1: immediately respond to a request for comment. Open AI did
Speaker 1: not provide a statement prior to the publication. So everybody's
Speaker 1: being quiet about it too, though, that's rather interesting. On Slack,
Speaker 1: the internal communication team provided three images of the man
Speaker 1: suspected of making the threat. Later, a high ranking member
Speaker 1: of the global Security team said, at this time, there
Speaker 1: is no indication of active threat activity. The situation remains
Speaker 1: ongoing and we're taking measured precautions as the assessment continues.
Speaker 1: Employees were told to remove their badges when exiting the
Speaker 1: building and to avoid wearing closed clothing items with the
Speaker 1: open AI logo on it. Okay, wow, so I mean
Speaker 1: there you have it. It's wild things going on.
Speaker 2: Listen.
Speaker 1: I'm all about how we should stop AIM. I'm not
Speaker 1: a fan of AI whatsoever, but I'm also not about
Speaker 1: doing harm to those that are working for the company
Speaker 1: like that.
Speaker 2: That's just that helps no one go ahead.
Speaker 3: Sam, Hey, just uh do you remember the unibom.
Speaker 2: And by any chance?
Speaker 3: Yeah, Oh, I've had.
Speaker 1: His manifesto on everything.
Speaker 3: Dude, what dude for I I don't believe it was
Speaker 3: a prophet, but I had boy had a profit like
Speaker 3: a sense of sight, because he straight up uh talked
Speaker 3: about Ai Golden Vogue and everything before AI was even
Speaker 3: quote unquote thought of you know what I mean.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's been a thing for sci fi for a
Speaker 1: good long while. But uh yeah, the article kind of
Speaker 1: misled me on this one. I thought was AI had
Speaker 1: gone rogan lockdown a office building.
Speaker 3: That's not the case, not to get biblical, but I
Speaker 3: was watching I was watching a video earlier today and
Speaker 3: you know the prophecy. I can't remember which prophet, but
Speaker 3: he talks about a statue coming to life and everything.
Speaker 1: I think there was that'd probably be John the Revelator
Speaker 1: from the Book of Revelations.
Speaker 3: But yeah, yes, what if that what what he saw
Speaker 3: was not an actual statue but a robot that was
Speaker 3: powered by AI.
Speaker 2: I just watched a sermon on that. As a matter
Speaker 2: of fact, was.
Speaker 1: It a black gentleman?
Speaker 3: I think me and you watched the same video because
Speaker 3: I was like, huh, who that that?
Speaker 2: I think it's very I think it's very possible.
Speaker 1: That's the thing that when it comes to the Book
Speaker 1: of Interpretations like that, it could be so many things.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry.
Speaker 3: Leonardo da Vinci, he made a full like when he
Speaker 3: was alive, he made a fully functioning robotic lion that
Speaker 3: actually he made an autonomaton and which is the actual
Speaker 3: name of it, and like he also made up designs
Speaker 3: of of the first helicopter but it had a court
Speaker 3: school canvas as the the propeller he made he did
Speaker 3: the battle expected battle elements of like a tank that
Speaker 3: he called the Total because and everything it looks like
Speaker 3: a top. And he also made uh, the first submarine too.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but if you look at his designs, none of
Speaker 1: them would have functioned, but he built He drew them
Speaker 1: that way on purpose because he was afraid of his
Speaker 1: blueprints getting stolen by other people.
Speaker 7: Uh.
Speaker 3: He also wrote in mirror writing, Yeah, yeah he did.
Speaker 1: The dude was backwards and upside down.
Speaker 2: The due was insanely smart, honestly. But yeah, so uh
Speaker 2: renaissance man. Yeah, yeah, me too, honestly.
Speaker 1: Although, as you're bringing up robots, that is a excellent
Speaker 1: segue to the next article that I wanted to bring
Speaker 1: up here.
Speaker 2: Damn wirebacks.
Speaker 1: The US humanoid robots retire with scars after helping build
Speaker 1: thirty thousand BMW cars.
Speaker 2: So what's the over under on this one.
Speaker 1: Apparently a United States company sold, you know, a bunch
Speaker 1: of robots to BMW and they were working in the
Speaker 1: manufacturing facility putting together BMW cars, thirty thousand of them,
Speaker 1: and now they've been retired because you know, wear and tear.
Speaker 1: The machines are a little beat up, scuffed up, and
Speaker 1: all these things. On screen right now is a picture
Speaker 1: of one of the robots that was used to put
Speaker 1: things together, and on the right you see his hands.
Speaker 1: You see some scuff marks on it. You see how
Speaker 1: it's been dinged up a little bit. But yeah, So
Speaker 1: the California based Figure AI announced on Wednesday that it
Speaker 1: is officially retiring its Figure two humanoid robots. The decision
Speaker 1: comes after an eleven month deployment at BMW's manufacturing in Spartanburg,
Speaker 1: South Carolina's plant. The pilot project was part of a
Speaker 1: collaboration to test humanoid robots on a real assembly line.
Speaker 1: The company highlighted that the F two units helped produce
Speaker 1: more than thirty thousand BMW X three vehicles and loaded
Speaker 1: over ninety thousand sheet metal parts during their deployment. The
Speaker 1: Figure CEO Brett Adcock, Wow unfortunate name shared visuals of
Speaker 1: the robots covered in scratches, scuffs, and grimes, signaling the
Speaker 1: realities of working in an industrial environment. Yeah, that's nothing new.
Speaker 1: Everybody knows that an industrial environment's really dirty.
Speaker 2: And hurts you.
Speaker 23: It's it's not exactly a hot take scratches as proof
Speaker 23: of real work, the company shared video footage of the
Speaker 23: f two robots clearly showing wear and tear from months
Speaker 23: on the line.
Speaker 1: Adcock describes this as real world deployment quote unquote. The
Speaker 1: visual service proof against earlier skepticism that figures work at
Speaker 1: BMW was only a small scale feasibility study. By showing
Speaker 1: the robot's warrant appearance, the company demonstrates that they operated
Speaker 1: for months on an active assembly line. The grime and
Speaker 1: scratch has become an unintended badge of honor. They show
Speaker 1: the robots endured the repetitive and demanding nature of factory work.
Speaker 1: The company said the visuals and performance metrics together validate
Speaker 1: their claims of long term deployment. So they did take
Speaker 1: a lot of data from the trial run, but they
Speaker 1: took lessons in the future of humanoids. The robotics firm
Speaker 1: was also transparent about hardware challenges. During the deployment, the
Speaker 1: forearm emerged as the main failure point due to the
Speaker 1: complexity of packaging three degrees of freedom, thermal management, and
Speaker 1: cabling into a human sized limb. Constant motion stressed the
Speaker 1: micro controllers and wirings, a problem rarely highlighted in the
Speaker 1: humanoid sector. The humanoid sector that's so strange to me.
Speaker 1: These lessons informed the design of Figure three. The new
Speaker 1: model eliminates the distribution board and dynamic cabling in the wrist,
Speaker 1: with motor controllers now communicating directly with the main computer.
Speaker 1: The F two retirement marks a transition from pilot testing
Speaker 1: to larger scale production.
Speaker 2: The company said.
Speaker 1: Figure two taught us early lessons on what it takes
Speaker 1: to ship. The fleet's retirement clears the way for Figure three,
Speaker 1: which the company claims is ready for scaled deployment. So again,
Speaker 1: as much as you know, people like myself have said
Speaker 1: that robots are going to be taking away manufacturing jobs,
Speaker 1: jobs that have been inherently human for years and years
Speaker 1: and years. It's not even like a robotic arm that's
Speaker 1: being used to package things. The facility that I used
Speaker 1: to work at Yeah, when you had a palette of
Speaker 1: fifty pound bags of sugar, right, it used to be
Speaker 1: loaded by hand, and it was saran wrapped by hand.
Speaker 1: Then they got a robot that was designed to do it.
Speaker 1: And when I say a robot, I don't mean humanoid.
Speaker 1: I mean it's a robotic arm that moves the bags
Speaker 1: and flips it and gets them all in a pretty
Speaker 1: stack and then wraps it for you. And then it
Speaker 1: goes out to where basically the worker all they have
Speaker 1: to do is push the start button and then they
Speaker 1: get on a forklift and they pick up the palette
Speaker 1: once it's done and move it to a staging area
Speaker 1: whatever the case is.
Speaker 2: So it's a efficiency thing.
Speaker 1: And I can understand that humanoid robots are about to
Speaker 1: start taking away so many jobs, so many jobs. And
Speaker 1: again give it another five years. The fine motor skills
Speaker 1: that are needed to do welding, or do carpentry or
Speaker 1: even do wiring electrical work, they're gonna start self maintaining themselves.
Speaker 1: It's oh, it's not gonna be pretty for the human race,
Speaker 1: for any kind of real manufacturing facility like this. Now,
Speaker 1: before we wrap good members of the retinue, I just
Speaker 1: wanted to show a comparison here. You know, different states
Speaker 1: got different things going on, and I understand that depends
Speaker 1: on the administration that you find yourself in. Cotech, which
Speaker 1: is the governor of Oregon, announces that Christmas in Oregon
Speaker 1: would now be known as Inclusive Winter Observance because they
Speaker 1: got to take the Christ out of Christmas, because that's
Speaker 1: that's how that goes. And I understand they're gonna make
Speaker 1: it seem like this is for all religions and it's
Speaker 1: more inclusive to everybody that's on the onset what it's about.
Speaker 2: Allegedly.
Speaker 1: I disagree, obviously, not for my own religious convictions, but
Speaker 1: this was done in a way to appease the liberal
Speaker 1: agenda of the state of Oregon. That's not a hot take.
Speaker 1: This is the same governor co Techs when she needs
Speaker 1: a damn cotext who was marching and rioting against Trump
Speaker 1: and saying that it was mostly peaceful protests during the day,
Speaker 1: when at night those same protesters were rioting and taking
Speaker 1: siege warfare tactics against the ice facility that was happening
Speaker 1: in Portland.
Speaker 2: This is the same woman, So for her to do this,
Speaker 2: it's like, yeah, that's that's not a good look.
Speaker 1: But all right, this is from Salem Morgan in a
Speaker 1: move that experts are calling bold, innovative, and the most
Speaker 1: orgon thing to ever happen. That's not a true statement.
Speaker 1: Governor Tina Kotec announced Monday that traditional Christmas celebrations will
Speaker 1: officially be replaced statewide with a new holiday inclusive winter observance.
Speaker 1: That's the most liberal sounding shit. The roll out, described
Speaker 1: by Tina as a necessary modernization of winter emotions. Like
Speaker 1: she couldn't be more liberal if she was trying. Come on,
Speaker 1: it will take effect immediately, despite the fact that most
Speaker 1: Oregonians were blindsided while attempting to buy Black Friday leftovers
Speaker 1: at fred Meyer. Christmas is too festive, says Tina at
Speaker 1: a press conference held beside a sustainability Harvested Ethically non
Speaker 1: judgmental stump. What, I'm sorry, what I have to reread that.
Speaker 1: I after we read that, because it's it's like, she's
Speaker 1: a goddamn caricature of what you think a bleeding heart
Speaker 1: liberal would be acting like and saying, and shit, I'm
Speaker 1: gonna reread this. At a press conference hailed beside a
Speaker 1: sustainably Harvested ethically non judgmental stump. Tina declared the Christmas
Speaker 1: in its current form carries outdated themes of joy, warmth,
Speaker 1: and unregulated cheer. These are outdated themes joy, warmth and
Speaker 1: unregulated cheer. These are outdated themes. We gotta get rid
Speaker 1: of these. I'm these elements, she said, adjusting a stack
Speaker 1: of color coded policy binders. She said, these elements do
Speaker 1: not reflect modern oregon values. If joy is allowed to
Speaker 1: spike without state guidance, where does it end?
Speaker 7: What?
Speaker 2: Wow? Wow?
Speaker 1: If you allow people to be too happy without the
Speaker 1: state having their hand on them, where does it end?
Speaker 2: Where does all this happiness lead to? Not the Oregonian way?
Speaker 1: Oh my god, that's that is absurd, honestly. And then
Speaker 1: also so she set all this next to a tree stump,
Speaker 1: which is, okay, it's a tree stump. Cool, But the
Speaker 1: fact that they had the list that it was a
Speaker 1: sustainably harvested, ethically non judgmental stump. What the fuck does
Speaker 1: an ethically non judgmental tree stump look like?
Speaker 2: What are we talking about right now? I'm I'm not
Speaker 2: getting mad.
Speaker 1: I'm just they're going out of their way to be
Speaker 1: liberal on top of being liberal on top of like
Speaker 1: this is this is psychotic level liberalism, honestly, and it's
Speaker 1: not like I said, it's not because there's like a
Speaker 1: massive population in Oregon, or a massive Jewish population in Oregon,
Speaker 1: or some type of other religion where they're like, hey,
Speaker 1: we have way more of these other religions than we
Speaker 1: do Christians, so we're not gonna call it Christmas here anymore.
Speaker 1: I wouldn't like that, but at least I could understand
Speaker 1: that I could put the pieces together on that. It's
Speaker 1: not even that it's them doing the most to be
Speaker 1: as democrat as possible for the sake of being the
Speaker 1: most democrat as possible. And that's just that's in my opinion,
Speaker 1: this is what I mean whenever I say that that
Speaker 1: party is Unamerican.
Speaker 2: That's that's just my take. Sam, Your hand is raised.
Speaker 2: Go ahead, brother.
Speaker 3: First off, that bitch is a comedy, and second off,
Speaker 3: words Randy Yorton with a punt cake him. Yeah, I
Speaker 3: agree on both genuine equality and uh yeah, somebody needs
Speaker 3: to give that bitch a factor, we said, but I
Speaker 3: do not condone violence against women.
Speaker 2: Agreed.
Speaker 1: Oh my god, look at what she's doing with it. Shit,
Speaker 1: Hold on Christmas trees now called seasonal vertical botanicals. They're
Speaker 1: not Christmas trees anymore. These are seasonal vertical botanicals and
Speaker 1: they must be certified non denominational and decorated exclusively with
Speaker 1: muted earth neutral tones.
Speaker 9: What earth neutral tone?
Speaker 3: I might just be the resident piehead at this point
Speaker 3: in time and I'm superstoned, but that don't make no
Speaker 3: a lick of sense.
Speaker 9: To my stone and doublood nommagata.
Speaker 1: So they're saying that earth tone is basically uh, okay,
Speaker 1: you were in the greens, you remember whenever you did
Speaker 1: face paint, right, Yes, those are being neutral earth tones.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: So they're saying that you can't decorate your Christmas tree
Speaker 1: with red ornaments anymore. You have to decorate your seasonal
Speaker 1: vertical botanical with muted neutral earth tones. Let's go to
Speaker 1: the next one. Santa Claus is replaced with the Seasonal
Speaker 1: Redistribution spec a figure task with distributing grants, not presents.
Speaker 1: Hold on, Santa is distributing grants, not presents, and he's
Speaker 1: not Santa anymore. He's the seasonal redistribution Specialist. Okay, stockings.
Speaker 1: These are rebranded as thermal sock shaped storage units required
Speaker 1: with required de EQ labeling. Wow, sleigh bells, Oh, come
Speaker 1: on now, sleigh bells slagh bells are prohibited due to
Speaker 1: excessive merriment.
Speaker 2: I don't even know what to say in response to this.
Speaker 1: This, this is actually the dumbest shit I've ever heard
Speaker 1: in my life. Caroling It's now called neighborhood Acoustic consensus chanting.
Speaker 2: Okay, gift exchanges.
Speaker 1: These are now called mutual seasonal redistribution using reusable burlap containers.
Speaker 1: By the way I'm at these are direct quotes. I'm
Speaker 1: not I'm not like reclassifying anything here. Holiday parties. It's
Speaker 1: no longer holidays. It's reclassified as group togetherness moments. This
Speaker 1: is gay as aides is what this is. This is retarded,
Speaker 1: and I mean, I get it, she's a flaming homosexual,
Speaker 1: but that's beside the point.
Speaker 2: That's beside the point. Wow.
Speaker 1: Participants must bring their own biodegradable plates, emotionally emotional neutrality,
Speaker 1: and a written five hundred word reflection on the meaning
Speaker 1: of winter.
Speaker 7: Wow.
Speaker 1: No, she's a lesbian, so I guarantee she ain't about
Speaker 1: putting nuting up there.
Speaker 9: But yeah, I was talking more of like the is
Speaker 9: that bitch rooched like straight from sodom.
Speaker 1: So continuing, it says she's coming after holiday lights because
Speaker 1: they're too twinkly. Gingerbread men are gendered. Snowmen are also gendered.
Speaker 1: Peppermint mochas are inflatiary risk factors. But okay, wow, Oregon, Oregon,
Speaker 1: my sweet Oregonians out there, y'all are screwed because of
Speaker 1: who you elected to lead, y'all. And then cut to
Speaker 1: my home state, the cutting edge Louisiana's new surgical castration law.
Speaker 1: I just wanted to show a comparison here. Louisiana just
Speaker 1: made it to where if you hurt children, you get
Speaker 1: your balls chopped off surgically. We're not doing the chemical
Speaker 1: castration anymore. We're we're not doing that. No, no, no,
Speaker 1: you getting them shits lopped off because that's the American way. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: Oregon's governor is passing this thing. I don't even know
Speaker 1: what to call this anyway, I want to read this
Speaker 1: just for a moment here. What do Madagascar, the Czech Republic,
Speaker 1: kondouna state in Nigeria, and Louisiana have in common. While
Speaker 1: it may be attempting to point to festive traditions. Like
Speaker 1: Marti graus, the connection is more sobering. Each of these
Speaker 1: jurisdictions has at some point enacted or permitted laws authorizing
Speaker 1: surgical castration as a penalty for individuals convicted of a
Speaker 1: certain sexual offense, including rape.
Speaker 2: In June of.
Speaker 1: Twenty twenty four, Governor Jeff Landry, Homeboy to the Max,
Speaker 1: signed Acts six point fifty one, Louisiana's surgical castration Law,
Speaker 1: which went into an effect on August first, twenty twenty four.
Speaker 1: Since it's enactment, the New published that the new punishment
Speaker 1: has caused controversy among legal community and activist groups.
Speaker 2: If or when a claim is brought.
Speaker 1: Under this statute, opposers will undoubtedly be met with a
Speaker 1: multitude of challenges. However, there was one guy who has
Speaker 1: had it done already, and I think, you know, that's
Speaker 1: something that we should just get behind. This is something
Speaker 1: I have no problem with my tax dollars funding, to
Speaker 1: be completely honest with you.
Speaker 2: So yeah, we covered a wide bevy of things on
Speaker 2: this episode.
Speaker 1: Good member of the retinue, and as we come to
Speaker 1: a close, I mean, if anybody has any saved rounds
Speaker 1: or unspoken words that they would like to let out,
Speaker 1: let it be heard, Sam, go for it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, the castration is a good old thing and everything,
Speaker 3: but what they should really do is take the whole
Speaker 3: branch too, because you can do it where they could
Speaker 3: still piss and everything. But with the with the pedophilia,
Speaker 3: even if you castrate them, they're still gonna the urge
Speaker 3: will always be there because it's not sexual, it's straight
Speaker 3: power dynamics, and they don't.
Speaker 9: Have to actually use their body to do it.
Speaker 4: They will use an instrument, agreed.
Speaker 1: So I personally believe that lead is in fact the
Speaker 1: ultimate cure for pedophilic behavior. That's just me, but I
Speaker 1: take this, if nothing else, to be a step in
Speaker 1: the right direction, you know.
Speaker 2: Anyway.
Speaker 9: Yeah, but the bullets too quick.
Speaker 3: I say, we use old school wrote from like the
Speaker 3: cell sailing, but I want the one made from hamp so.
Speaker 9: When it snatches it, it beds hitting, you know what
Speaker 9: I mean?
Speaker 1: No, I get it. I mean I agree that bullet
Speaker 1: is too quick, but also yeah, we could draw a
Speaker 1: quarter of these dudes that'd be sick. But I mean,
Speaker 1: at some point, because the exactly you know, it's it
Speaker 1: is what it is. All I'm saying is that at
Speaker 1: least my home state is taking a step in the
Speaker 1: right direction of what.
Speaker 2: Needs to be done to these animals.
Speaker 1: Meanwhile, other states are doing everything they can to take
Speaker 1: away the American way and that's sad. So, like I said,
Speaker 1: we've covered a lot on this episode, everybody, and uh
Speaker 1: We've covered a wide bevy of wild things as well.
Speaker 2: Talking We went from do Jewish dudes eat? You know?
Speaker 1: Period Vagina to uh Trump and him pushing out half
Speaker 1: of Congress and all that.
Speaker 2: We've gone all over the place. It's been a fun episode,
Speaker 2: I think for any of.
Speaker 1: The listeners of The Cajun Night, if you would like
Speaker 1: to join in on the conversation every Wednesday night at
Speaker 1: nine pm Central, go to the link in the description
Speaker 1: and join us at patreon dot com slash Cajun Night.
Speaker 2: There's only one tier for entry.
Speaker 1: We're just trying to grow this to be an information
Speaker 1: sharing group that gets together once a week and just
Speaker 1: discusses the goings and comings of the day to day
Speaker 1: life we have.
Speaker 2: Found ourselves in.
Speaker 1: Once again, everybody, thank y'all for joining me this evening.
Speaker 1: I am the Cajun Knight and as always, God bless