WEBVTT

1
00:00:07.320 --> 00:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>So we're getting good.

2
00:00:09.720 --> 00:00:13.720
<v Speaker 2>We gotta tell our audience we're actually this recording that

3
00:00:13.800 --> 00:00:19.239
<v Speaker 2>you're hearing was recorded seven days in your past. So

4
00:00:19.399 --> 00:00:22.719
<v Speaker 2>for us, about an hour ago the Pope got announced.

5
00:00:23.440 --> 00:00:25.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and American.

6
00:00:25.879 --> 00:00:28.320
<v Speaker 2>I think they probably just picked an American so that

7
00:00:29.320 --> 00:00:30.519
<v Speaker 2>GD wouldn't kill him.

8
00:00:30.960 --> 00:00:33.039
<v Speaker 3>I also read a tweet online that it's the Vatican

9
00:00:33.119 --> 00:00:35.799
<v Speaker 3>strategy to avoid tariffs.

10
00:00:37.079 --> 00:00:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, first American, first American Pope.

11
00:00:39.759 --> 00:00:42.359
<v Speaker 3>I did like maybe two weeks ago, reading an article

12
00:00:42.399 --> 00:00:45.240
<v Speaker 3>about the front runners, and I think the article that

13
00:00:45.280 --> 00:00:47.159
<v Speaker 3>I read didn't even mention this guy. It might have

14
00:00:47.280 --> 00:00:49.039
<v Speaker 3>mentioned him as like an honorable mention at the end,

15
00:00:49.079 --> 00:00:51.479
<v Speaker 3>but like all the front runners, it seemed to be

16
00:00:51.479 --> 00:00:55.280
<v Speaker 3>between like the really progressive pick was this Filipino that

17
00:00:55.399 --> 00:00:56.719
<v Speaker 3>was kind of like seen as it would have been

18
00:00:56.759 --> 00:01:00.719
<v Speaker 3>a direct continuation and even more progressive than Francis. And

19
00:01:00.759 --> 00:01:05.239
<v Speaker 3>then there was like actually another American guy as well

20
00:01:05.280 --> 00:01:08.680
<v Speaker 3>as maybe an Italian who uh and like an African

21
00:01:08.719 --> 00:01:11.400
<v Speaker 3>that we're considered kind of like the very very conservative

22
00:01:11.400 --> 00:01:14.959
<v Speaker 3>front runners. And this guy, from what I've read, seems

23
00:01:14.959 --> 00:01:17.959
<v Speaker 3>to be like pretty middle of the road centrist, So

24
00:01:18.000 --> 00:01:20.200
<v Speaker 3>I feel like he's probably a compromise in the in

25
00:01:20.239 --> 00:01:23.599
<v Speaker 3>the conclave between like the progressives and like the one

26
00:01:23.599 --> 00:01:26.280
<v Speaker 3>piece of analysis that make kind of makes sense if

27
00:01:26.280 --> 00:01:29.079
<v Speaker 3>you're just thinking the Catholic Church is like a business,

28
00:01:29.120 --> 00:01:32.640
<v Speaker 3>it's like, well, where are we growing, right? We're growing

29
00:01:32.640 --> 00:01:35.879
<v Speaker 3>in all the most conservative places, right, And where's all

30
00:01:35.879 --> 00:01:39.000
<v Speaker 3>the pressure to be more progressive coming from the secular

31
00:01:39.040 --> 00:01:41.359
<v Speaker 3>world where people are stopping being Catholics. So it's like,

32
00:01:41.400 --> 00:01:44.280
<v Speaker 3>why would we pick a super progressive guy when like,

33
00:01:44.359 --> 00:01:47.000
<v Speaker 3>if we were, you know, in the global North becoming

34
00:01:47.439 --> 00:01:50.640
<v Speaker 3>like pushing for a Catholic, a progressive Catholic church, and

35
00:01:50.719 --> 00:01:53.079
<v Speaker 3>we were all becoming Catholic, Well, yeah, sure that that

36
00:01:53.079 --> 00:01:55.000
<v Speaker 3>would make sense. But we're not right, we're all fucking

37
00:01:55.000 --> 00:01:57.120
<v Speaker 3>getting we're all turning our backs on the shirt. So

38
00:01:57.159 --> 00:01:59.719
<v Speaker 3>I understand from the perspective of the church that they're like, well,

39
00:02:00.159 --> 00:02:02.159
<v Speaker 3>we can't really pick a super progressive guy because that's

40
00:02:02.159 --> 00:02:04.519
<v Speaker 3>just going to alienate everyone in Africa and Asia who

41
00:02:04.599 --> 00:02:05.480
<v Speaker 3>like is Catholic.

42
00:02:05.599 --> 00:02:07.959
<v Speaker 2>We again, we haven't heard him speak yet, we haven't

43
00:02:07.959 --> 00:02:10.120
<v Speaker 2>heard his whatever address from the bound.

44
00:02:09.879 --> 00:02:12.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah he did, he spoke, Oh did you Okay, he

45
00:02:12.680 --> 00:02:14.759
<v Speaker 3>spoke right afterwards, he just spoke in Latin. And then

46
00:02:14.759 --> 00:02:16.319
<v Speaker 3>I think he spoke in Spanish a little bit and

47
00:02:16.360 --> 00:02:18.319
<v Speaker 3>just said a bunch of nonsense shit that you would

48
00:02:18.360 --> 00:02:19.719
<v Speaker 3>expect someone to say, like, h.

49
00:02:19.759 --> 00:02:21.719
<v Speaker 2>Didn't he get announced like two hours.

50
00:02:21.400 --> 00:02:24.039
<v Speaker 3>Ago though, Yeah, but when he gets announced he comes

51
00:02:24.039 --> 00:02:24.680
<v Speaker 3>out right away.

52
00:02:25.039 --> 00:02:26.319
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay.

53
00:02:26.360 --> 00:02:28.360
<v Speaker 3>For me, it's just always funny to watch like all

54
00:02:28.400 --> 00:02:30.960
<v Speaker 3>these adults like wearing these costumes and I'm like, holy shit,

55
00:02:30.960 --> 00:02:33.759
<v Speaker 3>they're taking this shit so seriously, Like it's just look

56
00:02:33.800 --> 00:02:36.439
<v Speaker 3>at these fucking LARPers like it's this is crazy, Like

57
00:02:36.479 --> 00:02:37.960
<v Speaker 3>look how serious they're taking it.

58
00:02:38.319 --> 00:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>If you look at look at other institutions that have

59
00:02:41.520 --> 00:02:43.639
<v Speaker 1>roots in the Middle Ages, and you see the same

60
00:02:43.680 --> 00:02:47.319
<v Speaker 1>sorts of things. What do you see a graduation ceremonies,

61
00:02:47.520 --> 00:02:49.479
<v Speaker 1>for example, You see a.

62
00:02:49.439 --> 00:02:51.400
<v Speaker 4>Lot of pomp and splendor.

63
00:02:50.960 --> 00:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>And gowns and outfits and ceremony.

64
00:02:55.439 --> 00:02:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

65
00:02:55.919 --> 00:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>It just just shows you that the ruins of the

66
00:02:58.840 --> 00:03:01.639
<v Speaker 1>feudal world were used to construct the capitalist world.

67
00:03:01.919 --> 00:03:02.719
<v Speaker 4>That's how it worked.

68
00:03:02.960 --> 00:03:07.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, why don't we transfer trans transfer.

69
00:03:07.000 --> 00:03:08.719
<v Speaker 3>To other stuff that's going on the news.

70
00:03:09.000 --> 00:03:12.680
<v Speaker 2>We'll move over to our topic du joure because there's

71
00:03:12.680 --> 00:03:13.680
<v Speaker 2>a lot to cover.

72
00:03:13.719 --> 00:03:16.919
<v Speaker 3>Which is related to a timely news event in Canada.

73
00:03:17.400 --> 00:03:20.120
<v Speaker 3>What is that getting a new prime minister.

74
00:03:20.439 --> 00:03:22.479
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, hey, everyone, a new leader.

75
00:03:24.159 --> 00:03:27.039
<v Speaker 2>We asked Diego to bow out for this episode because

76
00:03:27.039 --> 00:03:32.400
<v Speaker 2>we didn't want any foreign influence. Yeah, discussion, this is,

77
00:03:32.479 --> 00:03:37.479
<v Speaker 2>this is in Canada. Business. Episodes about Canadian politics don't

78
00:03:37.800 --> 00:03:38.520
<v Speaker 2>do very well.

79
00:03:38.639 --> 00:03:40.560
<v Speaker 3>I actually do kind of. I do kind of wish

80
00:03:40.599 --> 00:03:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Diego was here so that he could talk about the

81
00:03:42.599 --> 00:03:44.800
<v Speaker 3>lack of a material analysis in this book over and

82
00:03:44.840 --> 00:03:45.319
<v Speaker 3>over again.

83
00:03:45.719 --> 00:03:49.599
<v Speaker 2>M M, well he's here in spirit, now I can

84
00:03:49.639 --> 00:03:52.960
<v Speaker 2>do that. We got a new prime minister, never never

85
00:03:53.000 --> 00:03:56.039
<v Speaker 2>been in politics before. He was the head of the

86
00:03:56.080 --> 00:03:59.400
<v Speaker 2>European or the UK, Bank of England, the.

87
00:03:59.319 --> 00:04:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Bank of England, the Bank of Canada before.

88
00:04:01.240 --> 00:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>That, and he just jumped in here and uh beaten

89
00:04:04.400 --> 00:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>some sacks Wall Street experience or something too.

90
00:04:07.080 --> 00:04:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah Goldman Sachs, Yeah, Brookfield Capital. So we read his book,

91
00:04:15.159 --> 00:04:16.120
<v Speaker 2>it's six hundred.

92
00:04:15.879 --> 00:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Pages, cheerfully every word.

93
00:04:18.519 --> 00:04:21.639
<v Speaker 2>It's six hundred pages long. We read part We've jumped

94
00:04:21.639 --> 00:04:24.519
<v Speaker 2>around in his book and sent clips to each other

95
00:04:24.560 --> 00:04:28.000
<v Speaker 2>and kind of got the vibes. But the reason that

96
00:04:28.879 --> 00:04:32.480
<v Speaker 2>we find Canadian politics so boring because they are just

97
00:04:32.560 --> 00:04:37.240
<v Speaker 2>objectively boring. Relatively speaking, it's like watching American politics, but

98
00:04:37.319 --> 00:04:41.199
<v Speaker 2>with the mute button on. So we have we have Poliev.

99
00:04:41.279 --> 00:04:45.199
<v Speaker 2>Polliev is just in likeness and speech, a copy of

100
00:04:45.600 --> 00:04:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Ron Decientists, but with the with the volume turned all

101
00:04:48.639 --> 00:04:49.199
<v Speaker 2>the way down.

102
00:04:49.600 --> 00:04:50.560
<v Speaker 3>That's good. I like that.

103
00:04:51.040 --> 00:04:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, it's good.

104
00:04:53.319 --> 00:04:55.439
<v Speaker 3>Some people try to say Polyev is like Trump. He's not.

105
00:04:55.519 --> 00:04:57.319
<v Speaker 3>I think a much more apt comparison. I think you're

106
00:04:57.360 --> 00:04:59.399
<v Speaker 3>exactly right. He is like a Ronda scientist. That's that's

107
00:04:59.399 --> 00:05:00.160
<v Speaker 3>exactly right.

108
00:05:00.360 --> 00:05:04.199
<v Speaker 2>Or like Himmler, you know, just like a dorky, evil

109
00:05:04.240 --> 00:05:08.399
<v Speaker 2>little nerd. But he got beaten by this piece of

110
00:05:08.480 --> 00:05:11.439
<v Speaker 2>white bread. You guys heard him talk yet?

111
00:05:11.680 --> 00:05:12.399
<v Speaker 3>Who mar Kearney?

112
00:05:12.759 --> 00:05:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, oh yeah, for sure.

113
00:05:14.199 --> 00:05:16.199
<v Speaker 3>I watched him. I watched his visit, he visited the

114
00:05:16.199 --> 00:05:16.680
<v Speaker 3>White House?

115
00:05:17.240 --> 00:05:19.439
<v Speaker 2>And what did Trump think of him?

116
00:05:19.560 --> 00:05:21.879
<v Speaker 3>Trump seems to really like him, and I think, which

117
00:05:21.920 --> 00:05:23.879
<v Speaker 3>is funny. And I think it's just because of his

118
00:05:23.959 --> 00:05:27.519
<v Speaker 3>finance bonafides, Like it's just the fact that this guy's

119
00:05:27.560 --> 00:05:29.920
<v Speaker 3>like been a banker that Trump seems to respect him.

120
00:05:29.920 --> 00:05:31.319
<v Speaker 3>And I will say, when they were having their little

121
00:05:31.360 --> 00:05:33.879
<v Speaker 3>press event sitting beside each other, I think Carney did

122
00:05:33.879 --> 00:05:35.439
<v Speaker 3>a really good job, like as good of a job

123
00:05:35.480 --> 00:05:38.600
<v Speaker 3>as you can do, considering the circumstances like he he

124
00:05:38.720 --> 00:05:41.759
<v Speaker 3>kind of he kind of like threw in little praises

125
00:05:41.879 --> 00:05:44.920
<v Speaker 3>that were actually kind of like backhanded compliments. Like I

126
00:05:44.920 --> 00:05:47.920
<v Speaker 3>think he said something like, oh, Trump, look, you've you've

127
00:05:47.920 --> 00:05:51.920
<v Speaker 3>totally reinvigorated the like the like global defense initue.

128
00:05:51.560 --> 00:05:54.399
<v Speaker 1>Importance of like national security all over the world.

129
00:05:54.480 --> 00:05:55.959
<v Speaker 3>Trump like it's true, it's true.

130
00:05:56.199 --> 00:05:58.120
<v Speaker 4>Oh and starts with like a praise.

131
00:05:58.319 --> 00:06:01.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And he got asked about like fifty first state thing,

132
00:06:01.199 --> 00:06:03.920
<v Speaker 3>and Trump like obviously went on to talk about why well,

133
00:06:03.959 --> 00:06:05.360
<v Speaker 3>He's like it's not really up to me. It takes

134
00:06:05.360 --> 00:06:07.279
<v Speaker 3>two to tango, but like it would beautiful, you know,

135
00:06:07.399 --> 00:06:10.120
<v Speaker 3>like seeing that one piece of land and it's got

136
00:06:10.639 --> 00:06:12.920
<v Speaker 3>a race that that line that's some guy with a

137
00:06:13.000 --> 00:06:15.800
<v Speaker 3>ruler just just cut across it. And then like Carney,

138
00:06:15.839 --> 00:06:18.959
<v Speaker 3>I think he had he had like lines ready, right,

139
00:06:19.000 --> 00:06:21.759
<v Speaker 3>and he said he's like yeah, He's like if I may,

140
00:06:21.839 --> 00:06:24.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, He's like, Trump, you're in real estate, like you,

141
00:06:24.759 --> 00:06:27.120
<v Speaker 3>so you understand that there are some things that are

142
00:06:27.160 --> 00:06:29.439
<v Speaker 3>not for sale. And Trump was like it's true. And

143
00:06:29.480 --> 00:06:31.439
<v Speaker 3>he's like we're sitting in one right now, the White House,

144
00:06:31.519 --> 00:06:33.759
<v Speaker 3>right can't be for sale. And he's like yeah, that's true.

145
00:06:33.839 --> 00:06:36.879
<v Speaker 3>That's true. And he's like, and I've talked to I've

146
00:06:36.879 --> 00:06:39.000
<v Speaker 3>talked to the owners of Canada when I was campaigning,

147
00:06:39.560 --> 00:06:41.800
<v Speaker 3>and you know, they made it very clear to me

148
00:06:41.879 --> 00:06:43.519
<v Speaker 3>that Canada is not for sale and it's not going

149
00:06:43.560 --> 00:06:44.319
<v Speaker 3>to be for sale ever.

150
00:06:45.120 --> 00:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>It's such a funny I noticed, that's such a funny

151
00:06:47.240 --> 00:06:48.959
<v Speaker 1>way to put it to I talked to the owners

152
00:06:49.000 --> 00:06:50.879
<v Speaker 1>in Canada. He's like, love, let me just put this

153
00:06:50.920 --> 00:06:52.639
<v Speaker 1>in another way you'll understand.

154
00:06:52.759 --> 00:06:54.240
<v Speaker 4>Be a little little child.

155
00:06:54.279 --> 00:06:56.399
<v Speaker 3>Well that's you could tell that was deliberate, Like for

156
00:06:56.480 --> 00:06:58.040
<v Speaker 3>sure he thought of that. He's like, let me, let

157
00:06:58.079 --> 00:06:59.680
<v Speaker 3>me put it in those terms that he'll understand.

158
00:07:00.160 --> 00:07:02.040
<v Speaker 2>He means the electorate presumably.

159
00:07:02.240 --> 00:07:04.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I.

160
00:07:04.319 --> 00:07:05.920
<v Speaker 4>Think it was just like the owners.

161
00:07:06.040 --> 00:07:08.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking to a real estate guy, so there's like

162
00:07:08.399 --> 00:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>owners and tenants and that's all. Those are two types

163
00:07:11.040 --> 00:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>of people. But yeah, you know, he I saw the

164
00:07:13.720 --> 00:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>analysis like he stroked Trump's ego before he laid down

165
00:07:18.319 --> 00:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>some idea that he wanted to put forward.

166
00:07:20.959 --> 00:07:22.000
<v Speaker 4>He was well prepared.

167
00:07:22.120 --> 00:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>So the very few times he was allowed to speak,

168
00:07:25.120 --> 00:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>he just said exactly what he wanted, which was to

169
00:07:27.519 --> 00:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>push back on the fifty first state thing. And to

170
00:07:30.439 --> 00:07:34.199
<v Speaker 1>talk about Canada and the States coming to some kind

171
00:07:34.199 --> 00:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of agreement around the tariff situation.

172
00:07:37.160 --> 00:07:39.839
<v Speaker 2>It's good. It shouldn't be that hard to handle Trump

173
00:07:39.879 --> 00:07:44.000
<v Speaker 2>because psychologically he's like nine years old, like he wants

174
00:07:44.079 --> 00:07:46.639
<v Speaker 2>Canada and America to be the same country just because

175
00:07:46.800 --> 00:07:47.959
<v Speaker 2>look look at how big.

176
00:07:48.079 --> 00:07:49.879
<v Speaker 3>Exactly exactly, that's what you know.

177
00:07:50.439 --> 00:07:53.759
<v Speaker 1>A lot of it comes back to different ways of

178
00:07:54.560 --> 00:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>viewing Trump, like either as a child or as like

179
00:07:58.319 --> 00:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>dangerous and at least least surrounded by people who know

180
00:08:02.839 --> 00:08:06.319
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing. Maybe if he just kind of has

181
00:08:06.360 --> 00:08:08.839
<v Speaker 1>a vague direction he goes in and then there's the

182
00:08:08.879 --> 00:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>people around him who sort of know how to get

183
00:08:10.959 --> 00:08:13.199
<v Speaker 1>him there. And I saw that in the coverage. Again,

184
00:08:13.240 --> 00:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh look how Mark Karney like handles Trump. He's so

185
00:08:16.240 --> 00:08:19.879
<v Speaker 1>good at handling Trump. Stroke his ego first, and then

186
00:08:20.000 --> 00:08:21.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, deliver a blow.

187
00:08:21.639 --> 00:08:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Tell him he's a big boy. Yeah.

188
00:08:23.839 --> 00:08:25.279
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think you kind of have to do that.

189
00:08:26.120 --> 00:08:28.839
<v Speaker 3>And I think he he towed the line well in

190
00:08:29.720 --> 00:08:33.320
<v Speaker 3>It was somewhere between Zelenski, which was a disaster, and

191
00:08:33.360 --> 00:08:35.679
<v Speaker 3>then and then here Starmer. I don't know if you

192
00:08:35.679 --> 00:08:38.080
<v Speaker 3>guys ever saw clips of when the British Prime minister visited,

193
00:08:38.120 --> 00:08:41.159
<v Speaker 3>but it was hilarious. He was like, he was like, Trump,

194
00:08:41.200 --> 00:08:44.399
<v Speaker 3>I have for you like an envelope. It's never been

195
00:08:44.440 --> 00:08:47.919
<v Speaker 3>done before. It's an invitation from the king. And he's

196
00:08:47.960 --> 00:08:52.039
<v Speaker 3>like this is unprecedented, and like he loves using all

197
00:08:52.120 --> 00:08:53.960
<v Speaker 3>his language and it was like really funny and he

198
00:08:54.039 --> 00:08:56.320
<v Speaker 3>was like oh wow, and like just yeah.

199
00:08:56.440 --> 00:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Then Trump like congratulates Carney and like acts like he

200
00:08:59.639 --> 00:09:02.919
<v Speaker 1>gave him the election, which he kind of did, but

201
00:09:03.039 --> 00:09:03.399
<v Speaker 1>they did.

202
00:09:03.720 --> 00:09:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he said, he was like he was like I

203
00:09:05.759 --> 00:09:08.399
<v Speaker 3>think he said in the meeting. He was like he

204
00:09:08.519 --> 00:09:10.279
<v Speaker 3>was like, you know, some people might say I'm the

205
00:09:10.279 --> 00:09:11.720
<v Speaker 3>best thing that's ever happened to this guy.

206
00:09:13.279 --> 00:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he doesn't care that the Conservatives lost. He just

207
00:09:16.200 --> 00:09:19.399
<v Speaker 1>cares that it was he was the cause of it.

208
00:09:19.919 --> 00:09:22.840
<v Speaker 1>That's all he wants. So yeah, I mean that's that's

209
00:09:22.879 --> 00:09:25.919
<v Speaker 1>the funny thing. That's the funny way to talk about Trump. Anyway.

210
00:09:26.879 --> 00:09:29.279
<v Speaker 1>So speaking of what he's dangerous.

211
00:09:29.000 --> 00:09:35.039
<v Speaker 2>Canada and big, big Canada, it's very big folks. Did

212
00:09:35.039 --> 00:09:37.960
<v Speaker 2>you know that this guy was born in the Northwest territories.

213
00:09:38.320 --> 00:09:38.960
<v Speaker 3>I did know that.

214
00:09:39.919 --> 00:09:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Have you ever met someone from the any of the territories?

215
00:09:44.240 --> 00:09:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I have. I used to have a teacher who

216
00:09:46.799 --> 00:09:47.840
<v Speaker 3>is from the Yukon.

217
00:09:47.960 --> 00:09:51.200
<v Speaker 2>I think, yeah, back when we were kids, there was

218
00:09:51.279 --> 00:09:55.039
<v Speaker 2>only two territories and now there are three. But how

219
00:09:55.039 --> 00:09:57.720
<v Speaker 2>do we how do we explain this to the international audience,

220
00:09:57.799 --> 00:10:02.399
<v Speaker 2>because they're the territories are like by land mass, like

221
00:10:02.559 --> 00:10:06.080
<v Speaker 2>half or a third of Canada, probably half, But they

222
00:10:06.120 --> 00:10:09.360
<v Speaker 2>have like the population of a suburb, like less than

223
00:10:09.840 --> 00:10:12.360
<v Speaker 2>less than two hundred thousand people. Because it's oh yeah,

224
00:10:12.399 --> 00:10:13.000
<v Speaker 2>because it's cool.

225
00:10:13.039 --> 00:10:15.039
<v Speaker 3>I think I think each one has less than one

226
00:10:15.080 --> 00:10:19.399
<v Speaker 3>hundred thousand, and I think like only a couple tens

227
00:10:19.440 --> 00:10:23.279
<v Speaker 3>of thousands each. I don't know. They're just like territories.

228
00:10:23.279 --> 00:10:28.000
<v Speaker 3>They're very it's like mostly it's like a couple of small,

229
00:10:28.399 --> 00:10:31.759
<v Speaker 3>very very small cities of like ten to fifteen thousand people.

230
00:10:31.840 --> 00:10:35.200
<v Speaker 3>I think maybe like Yellowknife or white Horse, which are

231
00:10:35.200 --> 00:10:39.399
<v Speaker 3>the capitals of the Northwest Territories and Yukon respectively, have

232
00:10:39.559 --> 00:10:42.039
<v Speaker 3>like twenty or thirty thousand each, if I'm not mistaken.

233
00:10:42.399 --> 00:10:45.519
<v Speaker 2>Do we know why Mark Carney was up or his

234
00:10:45.559 --> 00:10:47.559
<v Speaker 2>parents were there where they are they.

235
00:10:47.559 --> 00:10:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, he ended up being raised in Alberta, though.

236
00:10:50.120 --> 00:10:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Of course it's one degree right now in a white

237
00:10:53.720 --> 00:10:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Horse and here it's like nine, so it's it's not

238
00:10:57.080 --> 00:10:57.639
<v Speaker 2>that cold.

239
00:10:57.840 --> 00:10:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's the springtime.

240
00:10:59.399 --> 00:11:01.840
<v Speaker 2>In the winter, it's probably like forty forty boys.

241
00:11:01.840 --> 00:11:04.360
<v Speaker 3>White Horse has thirty five thousand people, so that's like

242
00:11:04.399 --> 00:11:05.080
<v Speaker 3>the biggest city.

243
00:11:05.879 --> 00:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think if you wanted to find a topic

244
00:11:08.159 --> 00:11:11.639
<v Speaker 1>more boring than Canadian politics, I think Canadian geography and

245
00:11:11.720 --> 00:11:15.799
<v Speaker 1>population distributions is so congratulations if that was your goal.

246
00:11:17.200 --> 00:11:17.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry.

247
00:11:18.039 --> 00:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I just.

248
00:11:19.879 --> 00:11:22.919
<v Speaker 2>I just think that people would think that we would

249
00:11:22.960 --> 00:11:24.960
<v Speaker 2>like know or I don't know that we would know

250
00:11:25.039 --> 00:11:27.240
<v Speaker 2>more about this, but this is it might as well

251
00:11:27.320 --> 00:11:28.279
<v Speaker 2>be a different country.

252
00:11:28.559 --> 00:11:29.720
<v Speaker 4>It's boring to us too.

253
00:11:29.879 --> 00:11:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, people who were raised in Ontario don't learn

254
00:11:33.519 --> 00:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>French because we just don't have our pride until somebody

255
00:11:36.960 --> 00:11:39.559
<v Speaker 1>threatens to annex us and then we all get our

256
00:11:39.720 --> 00:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>find our national pride once again and vote Liberal once again,

257
00:11:43.960 --> 00:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>which is Canada's natural ruling party according to Wikipedia or

258
00:11:48.120 --> 00:11:48.879
<v Speaker 1>somewhere I read.

259
00:11:48.799 --> 00:11:53.279
<v Speaker 2>That that truly is. We read his book, This is

260
00:11:53.320 --> 00:11:58.159
<v Speaker 2>a guy. This is a guy, Harvard educated, Oxford educated.

261
00:11:59.039 --> 00:12:02.639
<v Speaker 2>His book is very interesting title for fans of our

262
00:12:03.200 --> 00:12:09.720
<v Speaker 2>podcast because it's value bracket s bracket, so value and

263
00:12:09.879 --> 00:12:15.440
<v Speaker 2>values in one six hundred page book written by a banker.

264
00:12:15.519 --> 00:12:19.960
<v Speaker 2>But I thought, you know, values, values and value. I

265
00:12:20.000 --> 00:12:25.000
<v Speaker 2>think of Nietzsche for the first and Marx as a

266
00:12:25.000 --> 00:12:29.639
<v Speaker 2>as the value theorist par excellence. And Marx actually gets

267
00:12:29.679 --> 00:12:34.000
<v Speaker 2>a lengthy section in this in this book that I read,

268
00:12:35.399 --> 00:12:38.000
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of he finishes with the mark section and

269
00:12:38.080 --> 00:12:40.200
<v Speaker 2>then doesn't ever reference it again.

270
00:12:40.799 --> 00:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't call it lengthy.

271
00:12:42.799 --> 00:12:43.559
<v Speaker 2>What is it? Uh?

272
00:12:44.480 --> 00:12:47.960
<v Speaker 4>I would tell you, like, very obligatory.

273
00:12:47.120 --> 00:12:50.080
<v Speaker 1>And dismissive is what it was. But you know, what

274
00:12:50.120 --> 00:12:50.879
<v Speaker 1>would you expect?

275
00:12:51.159 --> 00:12:54.960
<v Speaker 2>It's about ten pages. He goes through Adam Smith, Daniel

276
00:12:55.039 --> 00:12:58.879
<v Speaker 2>Ricardo and then Marx and and basically just says, this

277
00:12:59.000 --> 00:13:04.600
<v Speaker 2>is what value you was in neoclassical thinking, and yeah,

278
00:13:04.759 --> 00:13:08.399
<v Speaker 2>doesn't doesn't ever mention it again. But uh, the book was.

279
00:13:09.399 --> 00:13:11.200
<v Speaker 2>It was much better than I expected. I have to

280
00:13:11.240 --> 00:13:16.080
<v Speaker 2>admit it's it's it's wrong in a kind of shocking

281
00:13:16.240 --> 00:13:20.000
<v Speaker 2>way that you that someone who's this well educated, who

282
00:13:20.120 --> 00:13:25.000
<v Speaker 2>is this important in the world, could be so naive,

283
00:13:25.759 --> 00:13:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Like how did how does someone this smart be this dumb?

284
00:13:30.159 --> 00:13:33.000
<v Speaker 2>And that's my view, So maybe I'm maybe I'm the

285
00:13:33.039 --> 00:13:35.919
<v Speaker 2>idiot here, but I would expect I would expect some

286
00:13:35.919 --> 00:13:38.080
<v Speaker 2>some better insights from the manager of a of a

287
00:13:38.159 --> 00:13:38.840
<v Speaker 2>national bank.

288
00:13:38.879 --> 00:13:41.159
<v Speaker 3>If it were, this is exactly what I was expecting.

289
00:13:41.279 --> 00:13:43.399
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I like, with that pedigree, right, he was

290
00:13:43.440 --> 00:13:49.000
<v Speaker 3>at Oxford Harvard educated, he's he's center right or sorry,

291
00:13:49.000 --> 00:13:52.120
<v Speaker 3>center left. I you know, he was actually even more

292
00:13:53.200 --> 00:13:57.600
<v Speaker 3>like at least virtue signaling towards like left wing concerns

293
00:13:57.600 --> 00:13:59.519
<v Speaker 3>than I expected. So it's like, like, maybe that's what

294
00:13:59.559 --> 00:14:01.200
<v Speaker 3>you meant by it was like better than you expected.

295
00:14:01.639 --> 00:14:03.440
<v Speaker 2>No, I just meant. I just meant the writing, like

296
00:14:03.480 --> 00:14:04.720
<v Speaker 2>the anecdotes were apt.

297
00:14:05.120 --> 00:14:07.720
<v Speaker 3>That shouldn't be a surprise. With that education Oxford and Harvard,

298
00:14:07.720 --> 00:14:10.639
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure it would be well written. I mean, but

299
00:14:10.639 --> 00:14:13.000
<v Speaker 3>but I mean I think it's Yeah, but in terms

300
00:14:13.039 --> 00:14:17.840
<v Speaker 3>of its philosophical sophistication or like or just conceptual nuance,

301
00:14:17.919 --> 00:14:20.360
<v Speaker 3>it's yeah, it's pretty bad. It's just kind of hopeful,

302
00:14:21.000 --> 00:14:23.639
<v Speaker 3>hopeful nonsense that we can have capitalism with a more

303
00:14:23.679 --> 00:14:26.679
<v Speaker 3>friendly face, effectively putting it super simply, that's basically the

304
00:14:26.720 --> 00:14:28.399
<v Speaker 3>idea we can make capitalism nicer.

305
00:14:28.679 --> 00:14:30.519
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad you. I'm glad you say that because I

306
00:14:30.559 --> 00:14:33.320
<v Speaker 2>wrote I wrote in my summary here, this is just

307
00:14:33.399 --> 00:14:36.240
<v Speaker 2>normal neoliberalism, but with a happy face drawn over.

308
00:14:36.320 --> 00:14:37.240
<v Speaker 3>That's exactly what it is.

309
00:14:37.799 --> 00:14:39.639
<v Speaker 2>And this is like he's I.

310
00:14:39.679 --> 00:14:42.279
<v Speaker 4>Have to disagree with that assessment.

311
00:14:42.399 --> 00:14:47.399
<v Speaker 2>He's naive in the way that like greenwashing campaigns would

312
00:14:47.440 --> 00:14:49.679
<v Speaker 2>work on this guy, Like he's a he's a kool

313
00:14:49.679 --> 00:14:50.879
<v Speaker 2>aid capitalist.

314
00:14:51.960 --> 00:14:53.799
<v Speaker 3>Oh, Eric disagrees with us.

315
00:14:53.840 --> 00:14:54.799
<v Speaker 2>Let's hear it.

316
00:14:54.879 --> 00:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, just just because for me, neoliberalism is

317
00:14:59.399 --> 00:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>like unready related capitalism, and to me, it seems like

318
00:15:03.039 --> 00:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Mark Carney's going back towards a more Chiusian kind of

319
00:15:07.879 --> 00:15:13.039
<v Speaker 1>semi regulatory model, right, like he believes like, well, we'll

320
00:15:13.080 --> 00:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>get into the nuts and bolts of it, I guess

321
00:15:15.000 --> 00:15:17.919
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, but you know that there's value on

322
00:15:17.960 --> 00:15:20.799
<v Speaker 1>the one side, right, like market value what he manages

323
00:15:20.879 --> 00:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>as a banker. And then there are values plural like

324
00:15:24.320 --> 00:15:29.799
<v Speaker 1>social subjective values, right, like the reason you enjoy wine

325
00:15:29.879 --> 00:15:32.679
<v Speaker 1>and what you like to do with wine versus like

326
00:15:33.600 --> 00:15:36.879
<v Speaker 1>what the actual economic value of wine is. That's like

327
00:15:37.039 --> 00:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>more or less his distinction is drawn on that line, right,

328
00:15:41.480 --> 00:15:47.159
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, so you know, I it's maybe it's just

329
00:15:47.240 --> 00:15:50.759
<v Speaker 1>the definition of the term neoliberal, right he seems like yeah,

330
00:15:50.799 --> 00:15:53.519
<v Speaker 1>like Victor said too, right, Yeah, he's going to go

331
00:15:53.759 --> 00:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>towards a more regulatory framework, so I don't know, I

332
00:15:57.240 --> 00:16:00.639
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't call it neoliberalism. You know, the article The Canadian

333
00:16:00.679 --> 00:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Dimension agrees with you, though, because it's titled you know,

334
00:16:03.879 --> 00:16:06.039
<v Speaker 1>I read Mark Carney's book, so you don't have to,

335
00:16:06.159 --> 00:16:10.559
<v Speaker 1>and then subtitled Carney's commitment to shoring up the neoliberal

336
00:16:10.639 --> 00:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>status quo will only undermine Canada in the long term.

337
00:16:15.519 --> 00:16:18.960
<v Speaker 3>So you know, no, Eric, you're right. I'm I'm I'm

338
00:16:19.519 --> 00:16:23.519
<v Speaker 3>impressed with your analysis, Eric, because I think that there

339
00:16:23.639 --> 00:16:26.519
<v Speaker 3>is what I think you're putting your thumb on is

340
00:16:26.639 --> 00:16:28.799
<v Speaker 3>that there is like a bit of a leftist tendency

341
00:16:29.240 --> 00:16:33.919
<v Speaker 3>or whatever to just like call anything that's defending capitalism

342
00:16:34.639 --> 00:16:37.399
<v Speaker 3>just neoliberalism. And I think that, like, you're right, that

343
00:16:37.440 --> 00:16:39.399
<v Speaker 3>there's actually a nuance there that like you know, you

344
00:16:39.480 --> 00:16:41.000
<v Speaker 3>can still you can be there's such a thing as

345
00:16:41.039 --> 00:16:45.600
<v Speaker 3>other forms of capitalism, and neoliberalism means something more specific.

346
00:16:45.720 --> 00:16:47.879
<v Speaker 3>So I applaud you for your nuance.

347
00:16:48.480 --> 00:16:50.919
<v Speaker 1>I say, yeah, let's go for the precision here at

348
00:16:51.000 --> 00:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>least right now. And I don't deny that like regulation

349
00:16:54.039 --> 00:16:56.679
<v Speaker 1>and deregulation kind of go hand in hand, and there's

350
00:16:56.759 --> 00:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>like a bit of a blurry, there's a bit of

351
00:16:59.240 --> 00:17:01.919
<v Speaker 1>a blurriness there, but you can see the way he

352
00:17:02.039 --> 00:17:07.200
<v Speaker 1>writes is he's he's like celebrating the marginalist revolution and

353
00:17:07.319 --> 00:17:13.519
<v Speaker 1>economics and yeah, kind of reviving Keynesianism, but adding this

354
00:17:13.839 --> 00:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>idea of like corporate responsibility and social.

355
00:17:16.799 --> 00:17:19.559
<v Speaker 4>Values, which is all voting vague.

356
00:17:20.440 --> 00:17:23.799
<v Speaker 1>It's what what's that word? It's like patristic or whatever

357
00:17:23.880 --> 00:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that word. I keep forgetting that frickin' word. But it's like,

358
00:17:26.559 --> 00:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the benevolent overseers to make sure that our

359
00:17:31.279 --> 00:17:34.359
<v Speaker 1>markets are actually working towards the long term social good

360
00:17:34.680 --> 00:17:38.559
<v Speaker 1>by these benevolent overseers who are like semi government, semi

361
00:17:38.720 --> 00:17:40.759
<v Speaker 1>not because they're kind of central banks, so they have

362
00:17:40.839 --> 00:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>their independence from the government as well. But you know,

363
00:17:44.119 --> 00:17:47.319
<v Speaker 1>they're not just aiming to maximize, you know, the markets,

364
00:17:47.640 --> 00:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever stock market value. They're trying to make it work

365
00:17:51.119 --> 00:17:54.359
<v Speaker 1>for society. So we got to have corporate responsibility and

366
00:17:54.480 --> 00:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>the idea that we're all stakeholders, you know, like like

367
00:17:57.480 --> 00:18:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the song all the celebrities sent to us so kindly

368
00:18:00.599 --> 00:18:03.640
<v Speaker 1>during COVID, we're all in this together, right, and it

369
00:18:03.720 --> 00:18:06.079
<v Speaker 1>really that message really worked and brought us all together,

370
00:18:06.160 --> 00:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't it.

371
00:18:07.559 --> 00:18:10.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is not a huge disagreement, but I still

372
00:18:10.400 --> 00:18:14.240
<v Speaker 2>think it's neoliberal, Like, especially around chapter six, he's talked,

373
00:18:14.359 --> 00:18:19.160
<v Speaker 2>he praises Thatcher and Reagan and a lot of what

374
00:18:19.319 --> 00:18:22.799
<v Speaker 2>he thinks is gonna are he hopes happens is public

375
00:18:22.880 --> 00:18:27.000
<v Speaker 2>private partnerships. I would say so he wants. But again,

376
00:18:27.079 --> 00:18:29.759
<v Speaker 2>you're you're right that he says we need to rein

377
00:18:29.880 --> 00:18:33.680
<v Speaker 2>in the bad things, and then the bad things are

378
00:18:33.799 --> 00:18:38.599
<v Speaker 2>like he describes these in moral terms, which is kind

379
00:18:38.640 --> 00:18:42.160
<v Speaker 2>of weird for a banker, But he never says like

380
00:18:42.240 --> 00:18:45.640
<v Speaker 2>we're actually going to pass laws like closing tax loopholes

381
00:18:45.720 --> 00:18:48.519
<v Speaker 2>or anything. It's more, it's more, we're gonna if we

382
00:18:48.680 --> 00:18:50.680
<v Speaker 2>if we get our values correct.

383
00:18:50.759 --> 00:18:52.839
<v Speaker 3>That's the thing that's the biggest flaw with this book.

384
00:18:52.920 --> 00:18:53.759
<v Speaker 3>It's nonsense.

385
00:18:54.200 --> 00:18:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, then Volkswagen and gold min Sacks, they're all gonna

386
00:18:58.000 --> 00:19:00.160
<v Speaker 2>fall in line because they're gonna see that this is

387
00:19:00.200 --> 00:19:04.720
<v Speaker 2>the better way. So if you were to to regulate

388
00:19:04.880 --> 00:19:09.240
<v Speaker 2>with a heavy hand, then I would that would be impressive.

389
00:19:09.720 --> 00:19:11.680
<v Speaker 2>But let's get back to we want to summarize the

390
00:19:12.240 --> 00:19:14.599
<v Speaker 2>title of this book, the layout, what's he hoping for?

391
00:19:15.319 --> 00:19:20.480
<v Speaker 2>It starts off with just philosophically, a massive mistake in

392
00:19:20.640 --> 00:19:24.960
<v Speaker 2>my view, which is to say that value there's something

393
00:19:25.039 --> 00:19:31.359
<v Speaker 2>called objective value and then subjective values. So values these

394
00:19:31.400 --> 00:19:36.400
<v Speaker 2>are just things that are randomly chosen apparently, and they

395
00:19:36.440 --> 00:19:44.519
<v Speaker 2>include here's his list, solidarity, fairness, responsibility, resilience, sustainability, dynamism,

396
00:19:44.640 --> 00:19:48.440
<v Speaker 2>and humility. So just the whole bunch of bullshit buzzwords basically.

397
00:19:48.880 --> 00:19:53.039
<v Speaker 2>But we need to bring these values back solidarity, fairness,

398
00:19:53.079 --> 00:19:58.319
<v Speaker 2>responsibility into value, and value is just you know, the

399
00:19:58.440 --> 00:20:02.599
<v Speaker 2>market doing mar get shit. Anything else you want guys

400
00:20:02.720 --> 00:20:04.640
<v Speaker 2>to add to that? Is that close enough to the split?

401
00:20:04.759 --> 00:20:06.960
<v Speaker 3>I think that's that's that. I think that summarizes this

402
00:20:07.359 --> 00:20:09.160
<v Speaker 3>values distinction pretty well.

403
00:20:09.599 --> 00:20:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Because he kind of says yeah, and like we need

404
00:20:12.519 --> 00:20:14.599
<v Speaker 1>to bring back values and what did he say, like

405
00:20:14.720 --> 00:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and the and there are nine of them or something,

406
00:20:17.039 --> 00:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>and he just then he lists all the values. It's like,

407
00:20:19.400 --> 00:20:22.680
<v Speaker 1>don't worry, we already know what the values are. They

408
00:20:22.839 --> 00:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>just haven't been given enough attention yet. It's like, oh, okay,

409
00:20:26.640 --> 00:20:29.160
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, he's already he already knows the values.

410
00:20:29.640 --> 00:20:31.279
<v Speaker 3>That's the part that I found. But it's true, like,

411
00:20:31.359 --> 00:20:33.240
<v Speaker 3>so he has these values and it is very much

412
00:20:33.279 --> 00:20:38.240
<v Speaker 3>one of these uh like vibes shifts books. It's like

413
00:20:38.279 --> 00:20:40.200
<v Speaker 3>we just got to shift the vibes or like the

414
00:20:40.599 --> 00:20:43.440
<v Speaker 3>values of people and then everything will be solved. Which

415
00:20:43.519 --> 00:20:45.599
<v Speaker 3>is so, which is like the most frustrating kind of

416
00:20:45.960 --> 00:20:48.799
<v Speaker 3>I mean I feel the same way about some of

417
00:20:49.000 --> 00:20:51.519
<v Speaker 3>like the more radical democratic theory that I read from

418
00:20:51.559 --> 00:20:54.680
<v Speaker 3>my dissertation that it's like, oh, like people will see

419
00:20:54.720 --> 00:20:56.480
<v Speaker 3>that they like actually want to be democratic and go

420
00:20:56.559 --> 00:20:58.519
<v Speaker 3>to meetings all the time. It's like a vibe shift.

421
00:20:58.559 --> 00:21:01.000
<v Speaker 3>And it's like, no, like that's not the way it works.

422
00:21:01.079 --> 00:21:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Like you're not just gonna get a vibe shift, and

423
00:21:03.160 --> 00:21:04.920
<v Speaker 3>just like you're not gonna get a vibe shift in

424
00:21:05.119 --> 00:21:06.839
<v Speaker 3>ordinary citizens where they're going to want to go and

425
00:21:06.960 --> 00:21:09.640
<v Speaker 3>like be anarchists all the time. You're not going to

426
00:21:09.680 --> 00:21:11.920
<v Speaker 3>get a vibe shift in corporations where they're gonna like

427
00:21:12.039 --> 00:21:14.599
<v Speaker 3>want to start you know, being nicer on their own.

428
00:21:14.640 --> 00:21:16.519
<v Speaker 3>You need some fucking you need some authority, You need

429
00:21:16.599 --> 00:21:19.240
<v Speaker 3>some coercive power to force people to do those things.

430
00:21:19.319 --> 00:21:21.759
<v Speaker 3>You can't you can't just like have vibes do it.

431
00:21:22.039 --> 00:21:24.839
<v Speaker 3>This is more just like we need to like rediscover

432
00:21:25.119 --> 00:21:27.279
<v Speaker 3>what matters to us and what markets are supposed to be.

433
00:21:27.359 --> 00:21:32.400
<v Speaker 2>For you can have capitalism and some sort of progressive

434
00:21:32.440 --> 00:21:35.920
<v Speaker 2>politics and they can go together because the firms will

435
00:21:36.559 --> 00:21:38.640
<v Speaker 2>realize that this is the best way because they will

436
00:21:38.640 --> 00:21:41.400
<v Speaker 2>read his book and then they'll all just fall in line.

437
00:21:41.920 --> 00:21:43.559
<v Speaker 2>This is exactly, this.

438
00:21:43.640 --> 00:21:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Is exactly what like I feel like I kept thinking

439
00:21:46.200 --> 00:21:50.240
<v Speaker 3>about Jijak's cultural capitalism, like from the back in the earth,

440
00:21:50.359 --> 00:21:53.359
<v Speaker 3>like late too, twenty tens or like yeah, or late

441
00:21:53.440 --> 00:21:58.279
<v Speaker 3>aughts where he was talking about uh oh, like capitalism

442
00:21:58.359 --> 00:22:00.519
<v Speaker 3>with a human face, you know, oh, you know, when

443
00:22:00.519 --> 00:22:02.680
<v Speaker 3>you buy this and it'll be real. And that's why,

444
00:22:02.759 --> 00:22:05.680
<v Speaker 3>like I think Carney talks about those kinds of corporate

445
00:22:05.799 --> 00:22:08.920
<v Speaker 3>corporations that have like a separate mission to them, right,

446
00:22:09.000 --> 00:22:11.200
<v Speaker 3>and like, yeah, that could be like yeah.

447
00:22:11.640 --> 00:22:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I think there's an instinct. I think your instinct here

448
00:22:14.039 --> 00:22:17.599
<v Speaker 1>is right too, because when actually around when this book

449
00:22:17.680 --> 00:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>came out, the Jacobin did a review of it and

450
00:22:20.920 --> 00:22:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the title of it is Capitalists Can't Become Nicer, which

451
00:22:24.720 --> 00:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>is like what you're saying, you know, putting just like

452
00:22:27.160 --> 00:22:29.400
<v Speaker 1>capitalism with a smile kind of thing, and then that

453
00:22:29.599 --> 00:22:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the sort of headline is Mark Carney ex government of

454
00:22:33.839 --> 00:22:36.759
<v Speaker 1>the Central Banks in Canada and Britain has written a

455
00:22:36.880 --> 00:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>much hyped book about the problems with modern capitalism. But

456
00:22:40.599 --> 00:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>this consummate insider can't trace the roots of those problems

457
00:22:44.319 --> 00:22:48.839
<v Speaker 1>back to their fundamental sources, which which of course is

458
00:22:49.440 --> 00:22:52.759
<v Speaker 1>pointing out something similar like oh yeah, we can just

459
00:22:52.839 --> 00:22:55.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of, you know, paper over these issues. There's no

460
00:22:55.519 --> 00:23:00.119
<v Speaker 1>fundamental nothing fundamentally wrong with capitalism. It just needs an

461
00:23:00.160 --> 00:23:02.599
<v Speaker 1>injection of those values we were talking about.

462
00:23:03.519 --> 00:23:06.119
<v Speaker 2>I have a couple of short quotes from the intro

463
00:23:06.599 --> 00:23:10.279
<v Speaker 2>that just like encapsulate this whole thing. Quote, to build

464
00:23:10.319 --> 00:23:13.759
<v Speaker 2>a better tomorrow, we need companies imbued with purpose and

465
00:23:13.920 --> 00:23:18.759
<v Speaker 2>motivated by profit unquote. So they already are obviously motivated

466
00:23:18.799 --> 00:23:22.119
<v Speaker 2>by profit, but imbued with purpose. Is this kind of like,

467
00:23:22.759 --> 00:23:25.559
<v Speaker 2>so is this a policy here, Mark, Are you gonna

468
00:23:25.559 --> 00:23:27.119
<v Speaker 2>are you gonna force them to have purpose?

469
00:23:27.799 --> 00:23:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's what I'm wondering.

470
00:23:29.039 --> 00:23:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Probably not, you know, I guess not.

471
00:23:30.880 --> 00:23:34.799
<v Speaker 1>But so he insens behavior, Yeah, who knows.

472
00:23:35.200 --> 00:23:38.119
<v Speaker 2>He says so much of this should and should, and

473
00:23:38.240 --> 00:23:42.880
<v Speaker 2>he speaks fondly of like, well he's not just like

474
00:23:43.640 --> 00:23:46.799
<v Speaker 2>he thinks he's he thinks he's doing the progressive thing here,

475
00:23:46.920 --> 00:23:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Like he praises the Canadian child benefit program or whatever,

476
00:23:53.000 --> 00:23:54.960
<v Speaker 2>which is just like if you have kids, the government

477
00:23:55.000 --> 00:24:00.680
<v Speaker 2>will give you money. He praises carbon tac I think

478
00:24:01.039 --> 00:24:04.000
<v Speaker 2>the car and he reversed that since writing this book.

479
00:24:04.559 --> 00:24:09.200
<v Speaker 2>But also these these incentive programs that may that give

480
00:24:09.799 --> 00:24:13.559
<v Speaker 2>companies a reason to do the right thing. That seems

481
00:24:13.599 --> 00:24:17.880
<v Speaker 2>to be like what his favorite his favorite arrangement between

482
00:24:18.359 --> 00:24:22.240
<v Speaker 2>politics and and companies is. But here's the real tell.

483
00:24:22.480 --> 00:24:24.960
<v Speaker 2>So he says that he worked at the Bank of

484
00:24:25.039 --> 00:24:28.599
<v Speaker 2>England and this is the second quote to heal quote

485
00:24:28.839 --> 00:24:34.440
<v Speaker 2>heal the malignant culture at the heart of finance capitalism unquote.

486
00:24:34.920 --> 00:24:37.599
<v Speaker 2>So I don't I don't know what normal people think

487
00:24:37.680 --> 00:24:40.960
<v Speaker 2>when they hear that, like we should, we should maybe

488
00:24:41.039 --> 00:24:42.680
<v Speaker 2>like call up our dads or something. What do you

489
00:24:42.799 --> 00:24:44.960
<v Speaker 2>what does this what does this phrase mean to you,

490
00:24:45.079 --> 00:24:48.559
<v Speaker 2>to heal the heart of financial capitalism because to us

491
00:24:48.920 --> 00:24:52.519
<v Speaker 2>and to me, like, there's no malignant culture at the

492
00:24:52.559 --> 00:24:58.160
<v Speaker 2>heart of finance capitalism. Finance capitalism is the malignance and

493
00:24:58.240 --> 00:25:00.480
<v Speaker 2>the only way that it's not malignant is when it's

494
00:25:00.519 --> 00:25:01.759
<v Speaker 2>heavily regulated.

495
00:25:01.920 --> 00:25:03.799
<v Speaker 3>But he wants to well, that's the thing. You need

496
00:25:03.839 --> 00:25:06.319
<v Speaker 3>coercive force to channel those energies because right now the

497
00:25:06.400 --> 00:25:10.640
<v Speaker 3>incentive structure is just incentivizes those and like just having

498
00:25:10.759 --> 00:25:13.519
<v Speaker 3>like you're not going to solve that with vibes. You

499
00:25:13.599 --> 00:25:16.559
<v Speaker 3>need to bring in some policy to do something concrete

500
00:25:16.599 --> 00:25:18.319
<v Speaker 3>and I and you know, maybe there's parts of the

501
00:25:18.319 --> 00:25:20.119
<v Speaker 3>book that we didn't read or that I didn't read

502
00:25:20.200 --> 00:25:22.519
<v Speaker 3>where he gets a bit more concrete about But as

503
00:25:22.559 --> 00:25:25.519
<v Speaker 3>far as I could tell, his proposal really is focused

504
00:25:25.559 --> 00:25:29.559
<v Speaker 3>on changing these values and not on like what do

505
00:25:29.640 --> 00:25:31.079
<v Speaker 3>you want to bring in, Like do you want to

506
00:25:31.200 --> 00:25:35.440
<v Speaker 3>bring in laws that prevent billionaires from creating like taking

507
00:25:35.480 --> 00:25:38.559
<v Speaker 3>advantage of tax loopholes? Like do you want to bring

508
00:25:38.640 --> 00:25:40.839
<v Speaker 3>in like some kind of wealth taxes, Like that's what

509
00:25:41.000 --> 00:25:43.160
<v Speaker 3>you need if you want to like you need some

510
00:25:43.480 --> 00:25:46.359
<v Speaker 3>some actual uh, you know you need to stick here.

511
00:25:46.480 --> 00:25:51.559
<v Speaker 3>You know, you need some some coercive force. I don't understand,

512
00:25:52.799 --> 00:25:57.079
<v Speaker 3>like why anyone would think that that just just trying

513
00:25:57.119 --> 00:25:59.680
<v Speaker 3>to convince them that to be nice would do that.

514
00:26:00.039 --> 00:26:03.319
<v Speaker 1>And maybe yeah, like his last chapters and I mean,

515
00:26:03.400 --> 00:26:06.319
<v Speaker 1>in part three look like he starts to get into

516
00:26:06.519 --> 00:26:12.400
<v Speaker 1>more of this territory. Like one's called values based leadership,

517
00:26:13.079 --> 00:26:18.279
<v Speaker 1>how purposeful companies create value? Next one investing for value

518
00:26:18.759 --> 00:26:22.519
<v Speaker 1>s and the asses and brackets his title thing again

519
00:26:22.680 --> 00:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and then the last one is how Canada can build

520
00:26:24.839 --> 00:26:27.359
<v Speaker 1>value for all. And you know some of the ways

521
00:26:27.440 --> 00:26:32.519
<v Speaker 1>he talks about this is like to rebalance value and values,

522
00:26:33.079 --> 00:26:38.119
<v Speaker 1>we must develop and embed comprehensive and transparent approaches to

523
00:26:38.319 --> 00:26:44.559
<v Speaker 1>measuring stakeholder value creation by companies. Right, So he wants

524
00:26:45.359 --> 00:26:51.319
<v Speaker 1>companies to see themselves as value as stakeholders, and yeah,

525
00:26:51.440 --> 00:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>investors in companies to see themselves as stakeholders as well.

526
00:26:55.480 --> 00:27:01.039
<v Speaker 1>So that's that stakeholder capitalism thing, which, yeah, mostly a

527
00:27:01.160 --> 00:27:05.440
<v Speaker 1>rhetorical product project, like convince the companies first of all,

528
00:27:05.599 --> 00:27:09.319
<v Speaker 1>try to convince the companies that they have social responsibility.

529
00:27:09.799 --> 00:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>If they will not listen to you, which many of

530
00:27:12.279 --> 00:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>them won't, then you can start trying to financially incentivize

531
00:27:16.759 --> 00:27:19.319
<v Speaker 1>them to make better choices, which seems like what we

532
00:27:19.400 --> 00:27:24.559
<v Speaker 1>already do, right, like public private partnerships, right, private investments

533
00:27:25.359 --> 00:27:28.559
<v Speaker 1>backed by public dollars, because then the government can attach

534
00:27:28.599 --> 00:27:30.799
<v Speaker 1>strings to it and say, well, it needs to be

535
00:27:30.920 --> 00:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>invested in this way and have these sorts of checks.

536
00:27:34.599 --> 00:27:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Like I can't see Carne doing anything fundamentally different. I

537
00:27:38.240 --> 00:27:42.079
<v Speaker 1>could see him doing the same things differently since he

538
00:27:42.240 --> 00:27:45.599
<v Speaker 1>has this experience, maybe he'll come up with innovative ways

539
00:27:45.680 --> 00:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to incentivize companies to do this or that, whatever issue

540
00:27:49.319 --> 00:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>he decides to tackle first, probably not climate change, but

541
00:27:53.079 --> 00:27:56.839
<v Speaker 1>he's talked about that a lot before. He's probably going

542
00:27:56.920 --> 00:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to start looking at Canada's mineral wealth in the northern areas,

543
00:28:03.039 --> 00:28:08.640
<v Speaker 1>which are disputed. That seems like he's he's seems like

544
00:28:08.720 --> 00:28:12.079
<v Speaker 1>he's a natural resource focused guy as well on top

545
00:28:12.160 --> 00:28:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of all of this. Is so channeling those investments in

546
00:28:15.759 --> 00:28:19.200
<v Speaker 1>some kind of innovative way. That's the best I can get. Yeah,

547
00:28:19.240 --> 00:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I can see how it's just neoliberalism wrapped up in

548
00:28:23.119 --> 00:28:28.759
<v Speaker 1>some nice rhetoric and maybe with some more interventional style ideas.

549
00:28:29.319 --> 00:28:31.799
<v Speaker 2>We're going to see, right, we're going to see exactly

550
00:28:32.440 --> 00:28:35.039
<v Speaker 2>in the next two years, which is probably how long

551
00:28:35.119 --> 00:28:36.960
<v Speaker 2>this government will last. But we're going to see in

552
00:28:36.960 --> 00:28:40.880
<v Speaker 2>the next two years how this actually cashes out and

553
00:28:41.279 --> 00:28:43.680
<v Speaker 2>what he does with it. So I'm looking forward to that.

554
00:28:44.480 --> 00:28:49.400
<v Speaker 2>But again, his understanding of causality, I mean, he doesn't

555
00:28:49.440 --> 00:28:54.000
<v Speaker 2>understand causality frankly, because he says, like, Okay, it's proven,

556
00:28:54.440 --> 00:28:57.400
<v Speaker 2>we can prove the companies have to have to acknowledge this.

557
00:28:57.599 --> 00:29:02.319
<v Speaker 2>We can prove that well, equality or more equal wealth

558
00:29:02.359 --> 00:29:07.400
<v Speaker 2>equality is better for society, and then just moves on

559
00:29:07.519 --> 00:29:10.039
<v Speaker 2>from that, but he's like, the companies should realize this,

560
00:29:10.480 --> 00:29:15.839
<v Speaker 2>and they should thus take an interest in uh within

561
00:29:16.119 --> 00:29:21.000
<v Speaker 2>within their structures, have have good, solid paying jobs for

562
00:29:21.440 --> 00:29:26.559
<v Speaker 2>the workers, not give too many bonuses to the the CEOs,

563
00:29:27.480 --> 00:29:30.240
<v Speaker 2>and the companies should just realize this because the evidence

564
00:29:30.319 --> 00:29:33.200
<v Speaker 2>is there. But then the causality thing comes in, like,

565
00:29:33.519 --> 00:29:36.599
<v Speaker 2>if it's so good, Mark, why are they not doing

566
00:29:36.680 --> 00:29:40.319
<v Speaker 2>that already? Why is there this wealth inequality? And again

567
00:29:40.400 --> 00:29:44.799
<v Speaker 2>he says to other things like well, companies should be

568
00:29:45.160 --> 00:29:50.240
<v Speaker 2>invested in the lifelong education of their employees, make sure

569
00:29:50.279 --> 00:29:53.839
<v Speaker 2>that they have transferable skills. Should, should, should, he keep

570
00:29:53.880 --> 00:29:54.960
<v Speaker 2>saying over and over again.

571
00:29:55.319 --> 00:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>But then you ask them anything better?

572
00:29:59.359 --> 00:30:02.480
<v Speaker 2>So the revolution Now they've been asked. Now they're going

573
00:30:02.519 --> 00:30:05.440
<v Speaker 2>to realize this is good for Canada or something, and

574
00:30:05.480 --> 00:30:09.119
<v Speaker 2>now they're going to change. But he never explains why

575
00:30:09.240 --> 00:30:11.519
<v Speaker 2>they haven't done these things already, and I think the

576
00:30:11.599 --> 00:30:14.279
<v Speaker 2>reasons for that are are obvious. And then again, as

577
00:30:14.359 --> 00:30:18.240
<v Speaker 2>we've been saying, he also doesn't explain the stick that

578
00:30:18.319 --> 00:30:22.039
<v Speaker 2>he's going to use to change exactly. The carrot is, Hey, companies,

579
00:30:23.039 --> 00:30:24.680
<v Speaker 2>this is going to be good for all you guys,

580
00:30:24.799 --> 00:30:27.799
<v Speaker 2>if you help, if you pay your employees more, and

581
00:30:27.880 --> 00:30:30.319
<v Speaker 2>then never addresses they why they haven't been doing.

582
00:30:30.279 --> 00:30:35.240
<v Speaker 3>That exactly exactly, I think. In the Canadian Dimensions review

583
00:30:35.279 --> 00:30:40.759
<v Speaker 3>of the book, the author James Hardwick says near the end,

584
00:30:40.799 --> 00:30:43.160
<v Speaker 3>he's quoting from the book, and it's like, to build

585
00:30:43.200 --> 00:30:45.799
<v Speaker 3>a better tomorrow, we need companies imbued with purpose and

586
00:30:45.920 --> 00:30:50.319
<v Speaker 3>motivated by profit. Their activities will produce a shared value

587
00:30:50.359 --> 00:30:55.240
<v Speaker 3>that accrues to the shareholders as well as to employees, customers, suppliers,

588
00:30:55.640 --> 00:30:59.079
<v Speaker 3>and the wider community unquote. And then the author of

589
00:30:59.119 --> 00:31:01.119
<v Speaker 3>the review goes on right after to say this is

590
00:31:01.160 --> 00:31:04.920
<v Speaker 3>both inadequate and impossible, which I found kind of funny

591
00:31:04.920 --> 00:31:06.680
<v Speaker 3>because then he goes on to list a bunch of

592
00:31:06.759 --> 00:31:10.759
<v Speaker 3>stuff that should be done, and some of them, I guess,

593
00:31:10.799 --> 00:31:14.359
<v Speaker 3>seems like similarly high falutint for example, and the ownership

594
00:31:14.400 --> 00:31:18.519
<v Speaker 3>of our media by hedge funds and billionaires, nationalized corporate wrongdoers,

595
00:31:20.119 --> 00:31:23.319
<v Speaker 3>insist on the public ownership of key industries and resources.

596
00:31:23.359 --> 00:31:28.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I mean, those things seem like. I think

597
00:31:28.039 --> 00:31:30.119
<v Speaker 3>the issue with the Carne quote, though, is that he's

598
00:31:30.200 --> 00:31:33.519
<v Speaker 3>not specific about like what the outcome is, so like, Okay,

599
00:31:33.680 --> 00:31:38.039
<v Speaker 3>you want companies to be imbued with purpose, and like

600
00:31:38.160 --> 00:31:39.880
<v Speaker 3>you could. I mean, I guess in my mind, it's

601
00:31:39.960 --> 00:31:42.759
<v Speaker 3>not necessarily impossible if you make a policy that says

602
00:31:42.839 --> 00:31:45.720
<v Speaker 3>that if companies don't, you know, spend a certain amount

603
00:31:45.759 --> 00:31:49.279
<v Speaker 3>of their money towards X thing, or like, you could

604
00:31:49.319 --> 00:31:51.400
<v Speaker 3>make a law to do that, just like you can

605
00:31:51.480 --> 00:31:55.319
<v Speaker 3>make a law to nationalize corporate wrongdoers, right, Like, I mean,

606
00:31:55.440 --> 00:31:58.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's just the question is what are you

607
00:31:58.279 --> 00:32:00.839
<v Speaker 3>going to do to actually achieve that? Right? And I

608
00:32:01.160 --> 00:32:04.599
<v Speaker 3>guess maybe you know, I mean, I think that's a

609
00:32:04.640 --> 00:32:07.759
<v Speaker 3>problem with both what the author suggests and what Carne

610
00:32:07.880 --> 00:32:09.599
<v Speaker 3>is suggesting. Is like okay, like I mean you could,

611
00:32:09.640 --> 00:32:11.319
<v Speaker 3>you could, but you have to be specific about how

612
00:32:11.359 --> 00:32:12.000
<v Speaker 3>you're going to do it.

613
00:32:12.559 --> 00:32:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Wait, did you just say that Carney is pushing for

614
00:32:15.480 --> 00:32:16.920
<v Speaker 2>state ownership of industries.

615
00:32:17.079 --> 00:32:19.200
<v Speaker 3>No, No, that's what the reviewer of the book says.

616
00:32:19.240 --> 00:32:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I was like, if I miss that, I missed.

617
00:32:23.680 --> 00:32:27.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm just I'm just highlighting it because the reviewer like

618
00:32:27.279 --> 00:32:32.079
<v Speaker 3>quotes Carney and then says that is both inadequate and impossible, right,

619
00:32:32.920 --> 00:32:35.559
<v Speaker 3>and then right after that he literally says Canada needs

620
00:32:35.599 --> 00:32:38.000
<v Speaker 3>a prime minister capable of doing, and then he goes

621
00:32:38.039 --> 00:32:39.519
<v Speaker 3>through a bunch of lists, and I guess in my

622
00:32:39.640 --> 00:32:41.839
<v Speaker 3>mind I was kind of like, well, those things seem

623
00:32:41.920 --> 00:32:44.240
<v Speaker 3>similarly implausible to me. Also, like I don't know why

624
00:32:44.240 --> 00:32:47.279
<v Speaker 3>you're just saying that's impossible. Like, I agree, it's all

625
00:32:47.440 --> 00:32:51.279
<v Speaker 3>pretty hard. Uh, they're all you need. You need difficult

626
00:32:51.599 --> 00:32:53.680
<v Speaker 3>policies with trade ops that are going to piss people

627
00:32:53.720 --> 00:32:55.599
<v Speaker 3>off to achieve any of those things.

628
00:32:56.559 --> 00:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And and it seems to rely on this really

629
00:33:00.359 --> 00:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>tiresome assumption, you know, like arising tied you know, floats

630
00:33:06.240 --> 00:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>all ships or trickle down economics. Right, you know, wealth

631
00:33:10.559 --> 00:33:13.480
<v Speaker 1>wealth produced for the country is wealth for all kind

632
00:33:13.519 --> 00:33:17.559
<v Speaker 1>of shit, right, which we know isn't a thing you

633
00:33:17.640 --> 00:33:18.920
<v Speaker 1>know that's that doesn't happen.

634
00:33:19.119 --> 00:33:19.640
<v Speaker 3>We know.

635
00:33:19.799 --> 00:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>The problem is, you know, the markets are doing fine,

636
00:33:22.359 --> 00:33:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the markets are growing, and yet the average share of

637
00:33:25.319 --> 00:33:28.480
<v Speaker 1>wealth is going to fewer and fewer people. So as

638
00:33:28.599 --> 00:33:31.759
<v Speaker 1>the market does well, people do worse. How do you

639
00:33:31.799 --> 00:33:34.759
<v Speaker 1>fix that fucking problem? Right, you don't do that. The

640
00:33:34.799 --> 00:33:41.079
<v Speaker 1>whole neoliberal solution was to that kind of issue right

641
00:33:41.400 --> 00:33:44.880
<v Speaker 1>as it develops in the eighties, But the strategy was

642
00:33:44.960 --> 00:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>completely deregulate. So we're gonna go back to a you know,

643
00:33:49.359 --> 00:33:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a Kinesian economics that thrived probably mostly in like mid

644
00:33:54.359 --> 00:34:00.319
<v Speaker 1>century Golden Age conditions, in today's conditions where where the

645
00:34:00.559 --> 00:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>market value and people's well being are just completely at

646
00:34:04.400 --> 00:34:08.159
<v Speaker 1>opposite ends of the spectrum. And he thinks he's just

647
00:34:08.239 --> 00:34:10.159
<v Speaker 1>going to go back to this old system that worked

648
00:34:10.199 --> 00:34:15.480
<v Speaker 1>under completely different conditions, except not like pure government intervention

649
00:34:16.079 --> 00:34:21.039
<v Speaker 1>and demand side economics like in Keensian economy. But he's

650
00:34:21.079 --> 00:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>also has this sort of social values argument, which is

651
00:34:24.599 --> 00:34:27.159
<v Speaker 1>basically like, you know what I'm gonna do Keynesian, but

652
00:34:27.280 --> 00:34:30.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm also going to ask them nicely to do better.

653
00:34:30.480 --> 00:34:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Has anyone thought of doing that yet? If we just

654
00:34:33.000 --> 00:34:36.840
<v Speaker 1>asked that, hey, guys, do better, Oh my god, I

655
00:34:36.920 --> 00:34:39.239
<v Speaker 1>wish we thought of that sooner. But no, Like, how

656
00:34:39.320 --> 00:34:43.519
<v Speaker 1>many companies are going to be incentivized to care about

657
00:34:43.599 --> 00:34:47.679
<v Speaker 1>long term social values when the investors and owners don't

658
00:34:47.679 --> 00:34:49.400
<v Speaker 1>even know if that company is going to be around

659
00:34:49.440 --> 00:34:52.440
<v Speaker 1>for another one to five ten years, right, how many

660
00:34:52.519 --> 00:34:55.599
<v Speaker 1>companies survive that long? They get bought out, they get

661
00:34:55.880 --> 00:35:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the ownership changes, mergers happen, splits happen. Yet he thinks

662
00:35:01.360 --> 00:35:04.519
<v Speaker 1>it's like, there's just this stable basis that's going to

663
00:35:04.599 --> 00:35:06.760
<v Speaker 1>be there, and all he has to do is just

664
00:35:07.480 --> 00:35:10.000
<v Speaker 1>is just like convince the companies that this is in

665
00:35:10.079 --> 00:35:12.840
<v Speaker 1>their best interest, which is not. Why would it be,

666
00:35:13.639 --> 00:35:16.679
<v Speaker 1>So he's going to incentivize it. Okay, well that's going

667
00:35:16.719 --> 00:35:18.039
<v Speaker 1>to good luck with those.

668
00:35:18.480 --> 00:35:19.119
<v Speaker 2>Good luck with that.

669
00:35:19.320 --> 00:35:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's the first one to think of that.

670
00:35:21.559 --> 00:35:24.719
<v Speaker 3>I didn't disagree that it would be good if companies

671
00:35:24.800 --> 00:35:26.679
<v Speaker 3>did these things, right, Like, I mean, that would be

672
00:35:26.719 --> 00:35:29.519
<v Speaker 3>better than what we have now. It's just but the

673
00:35:29.639 --> 00:35:33.000
<v Speaker 3>solution to just like show them that they should just

674
00:35:33.119 --> 00:35:37.679
<v Speaker 3>be nicer is just kind of laughable. We need something,

675
00:35:37.920 --> 00:35:41.559
<v Speaker 3>like you need to be concrete and specific about like

676
00:35:41.719 --> 00:35:45.679
<v Speaker 3>how you're going to redistribute power, right, Like, don't just

677
00:35:45.719 --> 00:35:47.400
<v Speaker 3>tell them to be nicer, Like, how are you actually

678
00:35:47.440 --> 00:35:48.639
<v Speaker 3>going to make them be nicer?

679
00:35:48.719 --> 00:35:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Right?

680
00:35:48.880 --> 00:35:51.480
<v Speaker 3>You can't just expect them to be You have to

681
00:35:51.599 --> 00:35:52.840
<v Speaker 3>make them do it?

682
00:35:53.039 --> 00:35:56.039
<v Speaker 1>Is I think the problem, Yeah, because I think modern

683
00:35:56.199 --> 00:36:00.599
<v Speaker 1>mainstream economics, which is what he is mostly just rehashing

684
00:36:00.960 --> 00:36:04.519
<v Speaker 1>in the first half of this book, is basically designed

685
00:36:04.599 --> 00:36:07.599
<v Speaker 1>to I mean, one of its effects is to completely

686
00:36:07.679 --> 00:36:12.199
<v Speaker 1>absolve the capitalist of any social responsibility whatsoever. That's the

687
00:36:12.239 --> 00:36:16.360
<v Speaker 1>whole point he quotes the invisible hand thing a couple times.

688
00:36:16.880 --> 00:36:20.719
<v Speaker 1>But look what Adam Smith says. You know, he is

689
00:36:20.840 --> 00:36:23.480
<v Speaker 1>in this, as in many other cases, led by an

690
00:36:23.519 --> 00:36:27.119
<v Speaker 1>invisible hand to promote an end which was no part

691
00:36:27.239 --> 00:36:31.119
<v Speaker 1>of his intention. If we all operate with you know,

692
00:36:31.320 --> 00:36:35.239
<v Speaker 1>self interest in the marketplace, the invisible hand will guide

693
00:36:36.239 --> 00:36:39.559
<v Speaker 1>the outcomes of our behavior towards with socially goods, because

694
00:36:39.599 --> 00:36:42.039
<v Speaker 1>Adam Smith says, you know, people who actually like make

695
00:36:42.199 --> 00:36:45.199
<v Speaker 1>changes and intend to do things that are in the

696
00:36:45.320 --> 00:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>social good actually usually fuck things up. It's when you

697
00:36:49.159 --> 00:36:53.079
<v Speaker 1>operate with self interest in the marketplace that's when the

698
00:36:53.159 --> 00:36:57.320
<v Speaker 1>invisible hand works its best. But Carney kind of interprets

699
00:36:57.360 --> 00:37:00.400
<v Speaker 1>this in a modern economic way to say, like the

700
00:37:00.519 --> 00:37:05.039
<v Speaker 1>optimal functioning under competitive conditions of the market, which is

701
00:37:05.199 --> 00:37:08.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of the same thing. Okay, optimal competitive conditions with

702
00:37:08.760 --> 00:37:14.599
<v Speaker 1>no monopolies or oligopolies versus everyone acting in self interest. Okay,

703
00:37:14.800 --> 00:37:17.119
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of the same. But the problem is we

704
00:37:17.320 --> 00:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>do have those olagopolies and monopolies and enormous concentrations of ownership.

705
00:37:22.880 --> 00:37:23.840
<v Speaker 2>So what the fuck is he.

706
00:37:23.920 --> 00:37:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Talking about with this invisible hands stuff. It doesn't I

707
00:37:27.679 --> 00:37:30.280
<v Speaker 1>don't want to do the mark the Marx hater thing

708
00:37:30.360 --> 00:37:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to Adam Smith and say it doesn't apply anymore, but

709
00:37:33.079 --> 00:37:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you know conditions have changed.

710
00:37:35.920 --> 00:37:39.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's uh. I mean, let's we've we've we've completed

711
00:37:39.280 --> 00:37:41.880
<v Speaker 2>this critique, I think, which is, what are you actually

712
00:37:41.920 --> 00:37:44.119
<v Speaker 2>going to do about it? Maybe maybe he wrote this

713
00:37:44.239 --> 00:37:46.280
<v Speaker 2>book so that he could get elected, so that he could,

714
00:37:46.559 --> 00:37:50.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, bring a heavy hand to market regulation. I

715
00:37:50.440 --> 00:37:52.480
<v Speaker 2>doubt it, but it could be true.

716
00:37:52.840 --> 00:37:54.800
<v Speaker 3>That's a good point, though, Pills. That's a good point

717
00:37:54.920 --> 00:37:58.679
<v Speaker 3>because I actually think like that might explain some of it.

718
00:37:59.239 --> 00:38:01.920
<v Speaker 3>That's because imagine he had been really concrete and he's like,

719
00:38:01.960 --> 00:38:03.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to bring in a wealth tax, I'm going

720
00:38:03.960 --> 00:38:05.280
<v Speaker 3>to bring in no So I'm not saying that he's

721
00:38:05.280 --> 00:38:07.559
<v Speaker 3>going to do those things. But I do think that

722
00:38:07.599 --> 00:38:10.440
<v Speaker 3>there's a chance that he knew that he couldn't write

723
00:38:10.480 --> 00:38:12.800
<v Speaker 3>a book that was too concrete because it could damage

724
00:38:12.840 --> 00:38:16.039
<v Speaker 3>his chances, right if he says that, if he's actually

725
00:38:16.079 --> 00:38:18.159
<v Speaker 3>says admits that he's going to have a super heavy hand.

726
00:38:18.960 --> 00:38:22.679
<v Speaker 1>I noticed that this book was like, yeah, this it

727
00:38:22.760 --> 00:38:24.880
<v Speaker 1>already looks like he's thinking of running for office.

728
00:38:24.960 --> 00:38:27.920
<v Speaker 3>In this it does it does exactly, And he was

729
00:38:28.039 --> 00:38:31.800
<v Speaker 3>he's been so when when Justin Trudeau was first running

730
00:38:32.599 --> 00:38:35.239
<v Speaker 3>for like the liberal leadership back in I guess it

731
00:38:35.360 --> 00:38:39.039
<v Speaker 3>was twenty twenty fourteen or something twenty fifteen, there was

732
00:38:39.159 --> 00:38:41.639
<v Speaker 3>talk about Carnie like he didn't actually enter the race,

733
00:38:41.719 --> 00:38:44.360
<v Speaker 3>but it had been like taught, like he'd been raised

734
00:38:44.400 --> 00:38:45.880
<v Speaker 3>as a possibility for a long time.

735
00:38:46.679 --> 00:38:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that makes sense.

736
00:38:48.079 --> 00:38:51.519
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting because that would make sense of how this

737
00:38:51.679 --> 00:38:55.960
<v Speaker 2>book is so stupid. On that front, it seems like smart, smart, smart,

738
00:38:56.000 --> 00:38:58.239
<v Speaker 2>except you missed the elephant that you're sitting on with

739
00:38:58.320 --> 00:39:00.480
<v Speaker 2>your laptop typing out this book because it makes no

740
00:39:00.639 --> 00:39:01.320
<v Speaker 2>sense otherwise.

741
00:39:01.960 --> 00:39:02.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly.

742
00:39:02.559 --> 00:39:05.400
<v Speaker 2>But if we can turn maybe exactly to I want

743
00:39:05.400 --> 00:39:09.239
<v Speaker 2>to do a philosophical analysis, and that's of this distinction

744
00:39:09.400 --> 00:39:15.760
<v Speaker 2>between value and values. Now value I think he understands

745
00:39:15.840 --> 00:39:18.880
<v Speaker 2>quite well. He goes through labor theory of value, he

746
00:39:19.000 --> 00:39:22.639
<v Speaker 2>goes through marks. He explains that money is like a

747
00:39:22.719 --> 00:39:24.800
<v Speaker 2>measure of value, but not value itself, so he doesn't

748
00:39:24.840 --> 00:39:28.159
<v Speaker 2>make any of those like basic errors. But with values,

749
00:39:29.199 --> 00:39:31.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know where he's just getting this from except

750
00:39:31.400 --> 00:39:35.519
<v Speaker 2>his own his own brain, because values are random, arbitrary, subjective.

751
00:39:36.000 --> 00:39:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Beauty is in the eye of beholder. That's how he

752
00:39:38.039 --> 00:39:42.079
<v Speaker 2>explains what subjective is as opposed to objective, Whereas we've

753
00:39:42.079 --> 00:39:46.280
<v Speaker 2>been talking for like months here about the objectivity of

754
00:39:47.280 --> 00:39:51.599
<v Speaker 2>those the things that he's calling values, which are like fairness,

755
00:39:52.000 --> 00:39:56.079
<v Speaker 2>personal responsibility, how you act out the ideology of personal

756
00:39:56.159 --> 00:39:58.960
<v Speaker 2>responsibility in public. So I just wanted to draw attention

757
00:39:59.559 --> 00:40:05.480
<v Speaker 2>to that and get your your takes on it, because, yeah,

758
00:40:05.559 --> 00:40:09.159
<v Speaker 2>from my perspective, at least the plastic pills theory of value,

759
00:40:10.159 --> 00:40:15.000
<v Speaker 2>I place a similar amount of importance onto value as

760
00:40:15.079 --> 00:40:19.159
<v Speaker 2>he does. But I think that values are also value,

761
00:40:19.280 --> 00:40:23.159
<v Speaker 2>Like belief in society is a sort of valuing, and

762
00:40:23.280 --> 00:40:27.519
<v Speaker 2>that's the thing that keeps societies together. You your belief

763
00:40:27.559 --> 00:40:31.039
<v Speaker 2>in the society as a social project dries up, then

764
00:40:31.079 --> 00:40:35.760
<v Speaker 2>you see society turn in on itself or factions or collapse.

765
00:40:37.400 --> 00:40:39.760
<v Speaker 2>But if you if you read this guy, you'd think

766
00:40:39.800 --> 00:40:44.480
<v Speaker 2>that fairness was like just something arbitrarily decided. Beauty is

767
00:40:44.519 --> 00:40:46.679
<v Speaker 2>in the eye of the beholder. So people said, hey,

768
00:40:46.800 --> 00:40:50.079
<v Speaker 2>fairness looks good, let's let's do that because it looks good.

769
00:40:50.679 --> 00:40:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Instead of we chose fairness as a as a social

770
00:40:55.039 --> 00:40:58.800
<v Speaker 2>value because that makes societies stable, and the ones that

771
00:40:59.039 --> 00:41:03.320
<v Speaker 2>weren't stable didn't last that long, you know. And he

772
00:41:03.400 --> 00:41:08.760
<v Speaker 2>doesn't make any connection between values disappearing and capitalism. That's

773
00:41:08.960 --> 00:41:11.960
<v Speaker 2>another huge frustration of this book because if you read

774
00:41:12.039 --> 00:41:16.079
<v Speaker 2>someone not even a pro capitalist, but like uh, Max Weber,

775
00:41:16.960 --> 00:41:23.880
<v Speaker 2>this this the drawing up of different forms of social cohesion, religion,

776
00:41:24.519 --> 00:41:27.880
<v Speaker 2>church unions, all of that stuff is dried up because

777
00:41:28.480 --> 00:41:32.679
<v Speaker 2>of the market, not not not just one is chosen

778
00:41:32.920 --> 00:41:36.960
<v Speaker 2>and concrete and objective and one is uh subjective and

779
00:41:37.119 --> 00:41:39.280
<v Speaker 2>just arbitrary. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

780
00:41:39.719 --> 00:41:43.159
<v Speaker 2>So anyway, sorry, that's my take on this split between

781
00:41:43.199 --> 00:41:46.760
<v Speaker 2>objective value and subjective values. What did you guys think

782
00:41:46.840 --> 00:41:49.039
<v Speaker 2>of that theme? Okay?

783
00:41:49.199 --> 00:41:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Values with an S these are the principles or standards

784
00:41:53.440 --> 00:41:57.719
<v Speaker 1>of behavior, judgments of what is important in life. That's

785
00:41:57.880 --> 00:42:01.480
<v Speaker 1>values with an S. You without an S is the

786
00:42:01.559 --> 00:42:06.320
<v Speaker 1>regard that someone is that something is held to deserve,

787
00:42:07.280 --> 00:42:14.159
<v Speaker 1>the importance, worth, or usefulness of something. So values decides

788
00:42:14.199 --> 00:42:18.400
<v Speaker 1>whether or not something is important, and value is like

789
00:42:19.079 --> 00:42:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the regard that something is held to deserve. I'm not

790
00:42:22.000 --> 00:42:26.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what that even means. Really, it deserves

791
00:42:26.199 --> 00:42:28.719
<v Speaker 1>some level of regard or some level of importance. It

792
00:42:28.760 --> 00:42:31.280
<v Speaker 1>seems like He's trying to say magnitude of value here,

793
00:42:31.320 --> 00:42:34.559
<v Speaker 1>but he doesn't want to it just like values and

794
00:42:34.679 --> 00:42:40.119
<v Speaker 1>then quantitatively regarded values are a magnitude and that's the value.

795
00:42:39.880 --> 00:42:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Of a thing. Yeah, that's what I thought value is

796
00:42:41.960 --> 00:42:45.199
<v Speaker 3>is like is like a measure, Right, it's kind of

797
00:42:45.239 --> 00:42:45.880
<v Speaker 3>like a like a.

798
00:42:46.679 --> 00:42:49.719
<v Speaker 2>It is, it's it's something. Yeah.

799
00:42:49.800 --> 00:42:53.400
<v Speaker 1>The second chapter subjective value, right, that's what he's talking

800
00:42:53.440 --> 00:42:58.280
<v Speaker 1>about there. Subjective value is marginalist value. Right, like that

801
00:42:58.480 --> 00:43:03.840
<v Speaker 1>question he keeps asking, why is water so abundant but

802
00:43:03.960 --> 00:43:06.280
<v Speaker 1>it's so well, No, that gives it away. Why is

803
00:43:06.360 --> 00:43:09.400
<v Speaker 1>water so useful but so cheap? And diamonds are so

804
00:43:09.639 --> 00:43:11.280
<v Speaker 1>useless but so expensive?

805
00:43:11.639 --> 00:43:12.199
<v Speaker 2>Why is that?

806
00:43:12.400 --> 00:43:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Only marginalism can tell us why. It's because we always

807
00:43:16.400 --> 00:43:18.840
<v Speaker 1>think on the margins. It's that you buy a bottle

808
00:43:18.880 --> 00:43:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of water because you're only willing to pay for it

809
00:43:21.920 --> 00:43:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a certain amount. You subjectively determine the value of a thing.

810
00:43:25.840 --> 00:43:28.159
<v Speaker 1>When you look at a diamond, you think, oh, it's like,

811
00:43:28.400 --> 00:43:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it's scarcity is part of the answer

812
00:43:30.519 --> 00:43:33.519
<v Speaker 1>to It's kind of weird, but yeah, this is that

813
00:43:33.760 --> 00:43:38.559
<v Speaker 1>subjective values is what I was saying. It's demand side economics.

814
00:43:39.280 --> 00:43:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Kinsy and economics. It's to say what you will pay

815
00:43:42.840 --> 00:43:45.760
<v Speaker 1>for that thing is what its value is, and what

816
00:43:45.880 --> 00:43:49.079
<v Speaker 1>you actually pay for that thing is what you actually

817
00:43:49.199 --> 00:43:52.280
<v Speaker 1>pay for that thing, and the gap between what you

818
00:43:52.519 --> 00:43:54.719
<v Speaker 1>actually pay and what you're willing to pay, Like if

819
00:43:54.760 --> 00:43:56.840
<v Speaker 1>you're willing to pay it gives the example of shoes.

820
00:43:57.239 --> 00:43:59.639
<v Speaker 1>If you're willing to pay one hundred dollars for these

821
00:43:59.679 --> 00:44:02.360
<v Speaker 1>shoes with the price is in fact sixty dollars, it's

822
00:44:02.440 --> 00:44:05.000
<v Speaker 1>like you've saved forty dollars. Oh my god, that's the

823
00:44:05.079 --> 00:44:07.960
<v Speaker 1>consumer surplus. It's like, oh great, yeah, I go into

824
00:44:08.000 --> 00:44:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a grocery store. This piece of meat is ten million dollars,

825
00:44:11.000 --> 00:44:13.360
<v Speaker 1>but today it's on sale for one dollar. We're saving

826
00:44:13.440 --> 00:44:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you nine hundred and nine to nine, Like, oh my god,

827
00:44:15.960 --> 00:44:18.280
<v Speaker 1>get give me a fucking break with that. That that's

828
00:44:18.360 --> 00:44:21.079
<v Speaker 1>mainstream eponomics. I can't understand it.

829
00:44:21.360 --> 00:44:25.079
<v Speaker 2>Where does that come from? Like what economists devised this

830
00:44:25.239 --> 00:44:26.159
<v Speaker 2>as the measure of value?

831
00:44:26.639 --> 00:44:29.960
<v Speaker 1>William Stanley Jevins is one of the classic names in that,

832
00:44:30.280 --> 00:44:33.400
<v Speaker 1>like they're the they're postmark, like they're after marks.

833
00:44:33.440 --> 00:44:34.079
<v Speaker 2>I mean they're not.

834
00:44:34.159 --> 00:44:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Post Marxists, they're after marks, and Marx didn't address them.

835
00:44:38.039 --> 00:44:40.880
<v Speaker 1>But they came around in like the eighteen seventies or eighties,

836
00:44:41.239 --> 00:44:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's when the marginalist revolution happened, which thinks of

837
00:44:44.960 --> 00:44:45.519
<v Speaker 1>things like this.

838
00:44:46.400 --> 00:44:49.679
<v Speaker 2>I found this so strange because he goes through Adam Smith,

839
00:44:49.800 --> 00:44:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Ricardo and Marx, explains that they're they're all Smith and

840
00:44:55.440 --> 00:44:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Ricardo labor theory of value. Marx who also has a

841
00:44:59.480 --> 00:45:00.800
<v Speaker 2>labor theory of value but not.

842
00:45:00.960 --> 00:45:03.599
<v Speaker 1>Vaguely lumped in there with the classics.

843
00:45:03.199 --> 00:45:05.119
<v Speaker 2>But not the labor theory of value. But he's they

844
00:45:05.199 --> 00:45:09.039
<v Speaker 2>say that, you know, in some way value arises from

845
00:45:09.119 --> 00:45:12.559
<v Speaker 2>the labor that is in the commodity and.

846
00:45:12.639 --> 00:45:16.079
<v Speaker 1>The objective, because there's a there's a correct price for something,

847
00:45:16.119 --> 00:45:18.199
<v Speaker 1>there's a fair price, and it's the cost of the

848
00:45:18.320 --> 00:45:22.360
<v Speaker 1>inputs that's called that's called supply side, and that's not

849
00:45:22.480 --> 00:45:24.440
<v Speaker 1>what's important anymore according to him.

850
00:45:24.679 --> 00:45:27.840
<v Speaker 2>But what's weird is that he goes through this, presents

851
00:45:27.920 --> 00:45:31.760
<v Speaker 2>it like more or less accurately, not not the Marx bit,

852
00:45:31.880 --> 00:45:34.840
<v Speaker 2>but Ricardo and Smith more or less accurately, and then

853
00:45:34.960 --> 00:45:37.159
<v Speaker 2>just moves on to this other thing that is about

854
00:45:37.239 --> 00:45:40.320
<v Speaker 2>paying for stuff. He never like defeats the argument. He

855
00:45:40.440 --> 00:45:43.840
<v Speaker 2>never says that the labor theory of value is wrong.

856
00:45:43.960 --> 00:45:46.400
<v Speaker 2>He just presents the labor theory of value and then

857
00:45:46.480 --> 00:45:49.000
<v Speaker 2>presents this other theory of value, which is about you know,

858
00:45:49.239 --> 00:45:52.599
<v Speaker 2>paying for things that or you you make money when

859
00:45:52.719 --> 00:45:54.159
<v Speaker 2>things are cheaper than you expect.

860
00:45:55.119 --> 00:45:59.679
<v Speaker 1>You have identified exactly what every economics textbook and course

861
00:46:00.079 --> 00:46:03.880
<v Speaker 1>us they just it's like psychology too. They'll they'll give

862
00:46:03.920 --> 00:46:06.639
<v Speaker 1>you a chapter on Freud and then they'll just stop

863
00:46:06.760 --> 00:46:09.119
<v Speaker 1>talking about it and move on to the real stuff.

864
00:46:09.239 --> 00:46:12.519
<v Speaker 1>Basically is the is the implication there. It's like this

865
00:46:12.960 --> 00:46:16.119
<v Speaker 1>these cute, quaint guys like got Us started on the

866
00:46:16.239 --> 00:46:19.199
<v Speaker 1>path of like talking about value and all that stuff,

867
00:46:19.239 --> 00:46:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and it was so cute and like these guys were

868
00:46:21.519 --> 00:46:25.199
<v Speaker 1>so brilliant and oh my god, I just love these guys.

869
00:46:25.880 --> 00:46:29.000
<v Speaker 1>But but they were all wrong obviously, completely fucking wrong

870
00:46:29.079 --> 00:46:29.679
<v Speaker 1>and backwards.

871
00:46:29.800 --> 00:46:32.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. They treat like Marx, Ricardo and Smith like they

872
00:46:32.639 --> 00:46:37.199
<v Speaker 2>are doing Aristotelian physics and then we discovered Newtonian physics

873
00:46:37.320 --> 00:46:39.639
<v Speaker 2>like you can, we can, we can say everything that

874
00:46:39.719 --> 00:46:42.239
<v Speaker 2>they said, but we know that it's wrong just because

875
00:46:42.320 --> 00:46:42.880
<v Speaker 2>it's old.

876
00:46:43.760 --> 00:46:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Like Marx is like tall of me here and

877
00:46:46.639 --> 00:46:49.079
<v Speaker 1>doing some kind of geocentric economics.

878
00:46:50.159 --> 00:46:51.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I know. For I mean, I agree with

879
00:46:51.800 --> 00:46:54.039
<v Speaker 3>everything you guys were saying. I think it's it might

880
00:46:54.119 --> 00:46:57.840
<v Speaker 3>be worth also clarifying, uh, like where like kind of

881
00:46:57.920 --> 00:47:00.960
<v Speaker 3>the core thesis and like why the book is called

882
00:47:01.079 --> 00:47:04.039
<v Speaker 3>values and where his kind of argument for this change

883
00:47:04.079 --> 00:47:06.480
<v Speaker 3>in vibes come from comes from. And I guess I

884
00:47:06.599 --> 00:47:09.840
<v Speaker 3>did see it as being like it seems like his

885
00:47:09.920 --> 00:47:14.039
<v Speaker 3>main argument is, you know, we have this quantitative account

886
00:47:14.320 --> 00:47:18.239
<v Speaker 3>of value of things and like what they're worth, and

887
00:47:18.360 --> 00:47:22.159
<v Speaker 3>then that's been conflated with like values like moral value,

888
00:47:22.320 --> 00:47:25.360
<v Speaker 3>meaning that like our society, like the way in which

889
00:47:25.360 --> 00:47:28.440
<v Speaker 3>it's been corrupted is that people are like, oh if

890
00:47:28.440 --> 00:47:30.679
<v Speaker 3>the market it says it's good, like it is good

891
00:47:30.719 --> 00:47:33.519
<v Speaker 3>in like the moral sense and like the value sense,

892
00:47:33.599 --> 00:47:36.840
<v Speaker 3>and he's like, we need to it seems like, you know,

893
00:47:37.039 --> 00:47:39.119
<v Speaker 3>separate those things apart. And I guess, like the one

894
00:47:39.159 --> 00:47:41.800
<v Speaker 3>way in which I found that, like I found that

895
00:47:42.039 --> 00:47:44.840
<v Speaker 3>kind of I don't want to quite say like convincing

896
00:47:45.239 --> 00:47:47.039
<v Speaker 3>or like, I mean, in a way it's obvious. It's

897
00:47:47.119 --> 00:47:49.639
<v Speaker 3>just like an obvious point, like yes, that happens, but

898
00:47:49.719 --> 00:47:52.159
<v Speaker 3>it like reminds me of something that I notice a

899
00:47:52.239 --> 00:47:55.559
<v Speaker 3>lot in some of the trash debates that I consume

900
00:47:55.679 --> 00:48:00.320
<v Speaker 3>online about like Trump trump stuff is like the way

901
00:48:00.480 --> 00:48:05.360
<v Speaker 3>that people conflate legal rightness with moral rightness, and I

902
00:48:05.440 --> 00:48:07.960
<v Speaker 3>feel like maybe in this book he's pointing to something

903
00:48:08.079 --> 00:48:11.239
<v Speaker 3>similar where people will say, well, the market dictated it,

904
00:48:11.400 --> 00:48:14.039
<v Speaker 3>and like if that's what the market wants, and then

905
00:48:14.159 --> 00:48:16.519
<v Speaker 3>kind of sidestepping that question of like, well, what actually

906
00:48:16.639 --> 00:48:19.079
<v Speaker 3>like matters. I guess I don't know if that analogy

907
00:48:19.159 --> 00:48:21.639
<v Speaker 3>exactly works, but I just thought it was like worth

908
00:48:21.719 --> 00:48:23.440
<v Speaker 3>meant like kind of flagging that that was kind of

909
00:48:23.519 --> 00:48:25.920
<v Speaker 3>what I saw as the sort of central kind of

910
00:48:25.960 --> 00:48:29.079
<v Speaker 3>philosophical insight that he's trying to advance in the book.

911
00:48:29.480 --> 00:48:32.639
<v Speaker 3>And with the as it relates to the title, Yeah.

912
00:48:32.559 --> 00:48:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking along the same lines, thinking that it's

913
00:48:35.440 --> 00:48:38.679
<v Speaker 1>almost like value and values is almost like what like

914
00:48:39.000 --> 00:48:41.840
<v Speaker 1>justice in law, like that kind of distinction like what

915
00:48:42.039 --> 00:48:45.320
<v Speaker 1>is just versus what is legal? And you exflate the

916
00:48:45.400 --> 00:48:48.119
<v Speaker 1>two often, and we want to conflate the two because

917
00:48:48.159 --> 00:48:51.960
<v Speaker 1>it's easier, right, Like, well, if the law was also

918
00:48:52.199 --> 00:48:55.760
<v Speaker 1>just automatically just in all situations, then oh my god,

919
00:48:55.880 --> 00:48:58.840
<v Speaker 1>what a burden that would fucking take off. And the

920
00:48:58.920 --> 00:49:02.199
<v Speaker 1>same thing with the market, right, if everything was valued correctly,

921
00:49:02.440 --> 00:49:05.880
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean, that's a distributional thing, right, Values,

922
00:49:06.199 --> 00:49:09.679
<v Speaker 1>like the market is what distributes and allocates resources. Right,

923
00:49:09.840 --> 00:49:12.320
<v Speaker 1>So if if we didn't have to worry about that,

924
00:49:12.480 --> 00:49:17.519
<v Speaker 1>if it's value was always its value, like as if

925
00:49:18.199 --> 00:49:21.559
<v Speaker 1>laws were always just, then we wouldn't have anything to

926
00:49:21.599 --> 00:49:24.119
<v Speaker 1>worry about. So he's like kind of saying, like, no,

927
00:49:24.320 --> 00:49:27.559
<v Speaker 1>that's not the case. So let's make this distinction between

928
00:49:27.880 --> 00:49:32.360
<v Speaker 1>like values and value, and they're kind of different in

929
00:49:32.480 --> 00:49:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the same way that justice and law is different, Like

930
00:49:36.519 --> 00:49:40.840
<v Speaker 1>law is created by humans, but but value is created

931
00:49:40.880 --> 00:49:43.480
<v Speaker 1>by the gods of the marketplace that we're not supposed

932
00:49:43.480 --> 00:49:47.199
<v Speaker 1>to tamper with, right, because if you intervene, like too deeply,

933
00:49:47.280 --> 00:49:50.639
<v Speaker 1>you'll fuck up the market's ability to do what it does,

934
00:49:50.760 --> 00:49:56.239
<v Speaker 1>which is allocate resources and come to the perfect price.

935
00:49:56.559 --> 00:49:59.760
<v Speaker 3>And you will have people say things that are analogous

936
00:50:00.199 --> 00:50:03.599
<v Speaker 3>to the legal analogy. Because I remember a long time

937
00:50:03.639 --> 00:50:06.199
<v Speaker 3>ago I had a conversation with some girl at a party,

938
00:50:06.239 --> 00:50:07.679
<v Speaker 3>and she was a lawyer, and she was like a

939
00:50:07.760 --> 00:50:10.039
<v Speaker 3>corporate lawyer, and I kind of just like asked her

940
00:50:10.079 --> 00:50:12.519
<v Speaker 3>what I thought was like just kind of an innocent question,

941
00:50:13.320 --> 00:50:14.880
<v Speaker 3>which was like, oh, like do you ever feel like

942
00:50:15.000 --> 00:50:16.639
<v Speaker 3>because I feel like the kind of work she was doing.

943
00:50:16.679 --> 00:50:19.199
<v Speaker 3>She was defending corporations that like have a lot of power,

944
00:50:19.559 --> 00:50:20.719
<v Speaker 3>and I was kind of like, oh, do you ever

945
00:50:20.880 --> 00:50:24.239
<v Speaker 3>like feel a little bit like weird about helping these

946
00:50:24.440 --> 00:50:26.719
<v Speaker 3>And she's like, well, I never do anything illegal. I'm like, yeah,

947
00:50:26.760 --> 00:50:29.719
<v Speaker 3>I know, obviously you don't do anything illegal. And I'm

948
00:50:29.760 --> 00:50:31.280
<v Speaker 3>like that's not what I'm asking you. I'm like, I'm

949
00:50:31.320 --> 00:50:33.199
<v Speaker 3>just curious, like, do you ever feel like, you know,

950
00:50:33.280 --> 00:50:35.199
<v Speaker 3>a little bit like of moral And she's like, no,

951
00:50:35.400 --> 00:50:37.440
<v Speaker 3>I would obviously never do anything illegal. And she got

952
00:50:37.480 --> 00:50:39.039
<v Speaker 3>really defensive and mad at me, and she's just like

953
00:50:39.119 --> 00:50:42.159
<v Speaker 3>didn't understand that there was a difference between And I

954
00:50:42.199 --> 00:50:44.440
<v Speaker 3>feel like in some sometimes CEOs sort of do the

955
00:50:44.519 --> 00:50:46.880
<v Speaker 3>same thing where they'll be like, well, you know, I'm

956
00:50:46.920 --> 00:50:48.679
<v Speaker 3>just doing what the market. I'm just I'm just selling

957
00:50:48.719 --> 00:50:51.280
<v Speaker 3>people what they want, like this is what the market dictates,

958
00:50:51.440 --> 00:50:53.119
<v Speaker 3>like you know. And it's like, but do you ever

959
00:50:53.199 --> 00:50:55.559
<v Speaker 3>feel like you're maybe influencing And they'll be like, you know, no,

960
00:50:55.679 --> 00:50:58.320
<v Speaker 3>but like this is what people want, this is the market,

961
00:50:58.519 --> 00:51:02.119
<v Speaker 3>you know. And it's like, well, though, well.

962
00:51:02.039 --> 00:51:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Do you guys like if that's if that's the thesis

963
00:51:04.599 --> 00:51:08.519
<v Speaker 2>that law is to justice. What what is it? The

964
00:51:08.599 --> 00:51:14.159
<v Speaker 2>market is to value, value is to values. Yeah, that's stupid,

965
00:51:15.239 --> 00:51:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Like that's not even correct. Like if if, if, just

966
00:51:18.559 --> 00:51:22.400
<v Speaker 2>if laws were just, you wouldn't need judges or lawyers.

967
00:51:22.440 --> 00:51:24.400
<v Speaker 2>You wouldn't you wouldn't need law, You wouldn't need any

968
00:51:24.519 --> 00:51:27.320
<v Speaker 2>legal system at all, because those are the those are

969
00:51:27.320 --> 00:51:32.559
<v Speaker 2>the those decisions made by judges in particular, are the

970
00:51:32.679 --> 00:51:35.960
<v Speaker 2>things that make the law the law, which is the

971
00:51:36.199 --> 00:51:39.920
<v Speaker 2>entire legal system, which is decisions, net decision my ney decisions.

972
00:51:40.000 --> 00:51:43.800
<v Speaker 2>You don't need justice at all to even be a concept.

973
00:51:44.480 --> 00:51:48.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, No, I think I think what we're saying is is, yeah,

974
00:51:48.639 --> 00:51:51.280
<v Speaker 1>those two often get conflated, and I say, it'd be

975
00:51:51.360 --> 00:51:53.760
<v Speaker 1>nice if they were the same thing. But we don't

976
00:51:53.760 --> 00:51:56.519
<v Speaker 1>think Mark Carney isn't making that conflation. He's making a

977
00:51:56.559 --> 00:52:00.360
<v Speaker 1>point of distinguishing between those two things, right, right, saying

978
00:52:00.800 --> 00:52:04.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, we haven't balanced, we haven't balanced these two things. Right,

979
00:52:04.719 --> 00:52:08.840
<v Speaker 1>value is heavier, so better values is like down here

980
00:52:08.960 --> 00:52:11.639
<v Speaker 1>and whatever the better one is. Yeah, they're out of balance.

981
00:52:12.079 --> 00:52:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if I can, if I can finish my point.

982
00:52:14.000 --> 00:52:17.840
<v Speaker 2>It's just this is an illusion, right, It's an illusion

983
00:52:17.960 --> 00:52:22.239
<v Speaker 2>to say that. Uh, well, he's he's quite certain that

984
00:52:22.400 --> 00:52:26.199
<v Speaker 2>value is like concrete value doesn't have to do with

985
00:52:26.639 --> 00:52:30.199
<v Speaker 2>people's personal decisions except in the in fact, like they

986
00:52:30.239 --> 00:52:34.840
<v Speaker 2>were willing to buy buy things. But value itself has

987
00:52:34.920 --> 00:52:39.360
<v Speaker 2>this concrete, almost sacredness that's determined by the market, and

988
00:52:39.440 --> 00:52:42.239
<v Speaker 2>there's nothing, like nothing can touch it. So the thing

989
00:52:42.320 --> 00:52:45.800
<v Speaker 2>that we have to do is also give values. Some

990
00:52:46.079 --> 00:52:49.400
<v Speaker 2>do because they've been drowned out by the market and

991
00:52:49.480 --> 00:52:52.159
<v Speaker 2>they don't have necessarily any place in the market. But

992
00:52:52.280 --> 00:52:54.440
<v Speaker 2>these are not real things, Like he can't make a

993
00:52:54.480 --> 00:52:59.320
<v Speaker 2>compelling argument for subjective values because he's already said that

994
00:52:59.400 --> 00:53:03.559
<v Speaker 2>they don't matter, Like we have to brute force values

995
00:53:03.880 --> 00:53:06.119
<v Speaker 2>back into the market because it's not going to operate

996
00:53:06.199 --> 00:53:12.400
<v Speaker 2>based on them. And those values again are solidarity, fairness, responsibility, resilience, sustainability,

997
00:53:12.440 --> 00:53:15.519
<v Speaker 2>blah blah blah. These things are obviously not within the

998
00:53:15.599 --> 00:53:18.880
<v Speaker 2>purview of self interest. But he also doesn't think that

999
00:53:18.960 --> 00:53:23.079
<v Speaker 2>they're real, Like they don't they don't have value. I

1000
00:53:23.159 --> 00:53:25.039
<v Speaker 2>was gonna say value, which would screw up the whole thing.

1001
00:53:25.199 --> 00:53:29.079
<v Speaker 2>They don't have any weight value for him. Still he

1002
00:53:29.159 --> 00:53:31.760
<v Speaker 2>wants to put on this balancing act, as Eric said,

1003
00:53:32.079 --> 00:53:35.119
<v Speaker 2>but value is the only thing that's real. And if

1004
00:53:35.119 --> 00:53:37.599
<v Speaker 2>we go back to, you know, our theory of habit

1005
00:53:37.719 --> 00:53:40.800
<v Speaker 2>and our theory of what religion should actually look like,

1006
00:53:41.280 --> 00:53:45.400
<v Speaker 2>those things are objectively real, even for materialists, in a

1007
00:53:45.440 --> 00:53:47.920
<v Speaker 2>way that he hasn't acknowledged here. But I don't understand

1008
00:53:48.000 --> 00:53:50.960
<v Speaker 2>what he's trying to do. If this value values thing

1009
00:53:51.440 --> 00:53:54.119
<v Speaker 2>is like telling people you have to believe in this

1010
00:53:54.239 --> 00:53:56.559
<v Speaker 2>illusion that I just created for you, while admitting that

1011
00:53:56.639 --> 00:54:02.079
<v Speaker 2>it's an illusion, like there's no there's no moral demand

1012
00:54:02.280 --> 00:54:05.639
<v Speaker 2>or moral urgency because he said, I just made these

1013
00:54:05.719 --> 00:54:07.960
<v Speaker 2>things up, or they used to be real and they're

1014
00:54:08.000 --> 00:54:10.440
<v Speaker 2>no longer real. But we have to all believe in

1015
00:54:10.480 --> 00:54:13.519
<v Speaker 2>the illusion. Guys, let's all go into the cave again together.

1016
00:54:13.880 --> 00:54:16.199
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how that could be convincing. I don't

1017
00:54:16.239 --> 00:54:19.440
<v Speaker 2>know how he sits in his office writing this and goes, yeah,

1018
00:54:20.039 --> 00:54:21.480
<v Speaker 2>I have to I have to tell them that this

1019
00:54:21.719 --> 00:54:25.280
<v Speaker 2>is fake, or I have to tell them this is subjective,

1020
00:54:25.440 --> 00:54:27.719
<v Speaker 2>just decided in the eye of the beholder. But then

1021
00:54:27.760 --> 00:54:30.280
<v Speaker 2>we also all have to agree to do this together

1022
00:54:30.400 --> 00:54:31.159
<v Speaker 2>as Canadians.

1023
00:54:32.199 --> 00:54:34.039
<v Speaker 3>Well, he's trying to be Prime minister, bro, that's why.

1024
00:54:34.159 --> 00:54:35.519
<v Speaker 3>That's why he's keeping it.

1025
00:54:36.000 --> 00:54:38.519
<v Speaker 2>His card's close to his chest, but you can't say, hey,

1026
00:54:38.599 --> 00:54:41.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm loe, Hey, this is untrue, but you should believe

1027
00:54:41.280 --> 00:54:41.760
<v Speaker 2>it anyway.

1028
00:54:42.440 --> 00:54:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you pointed out earlier, and I think it's very

1029
00:54:45.519 --> 00:54:49.119
<v Speaker 1>telling that Mark Carney praised the carbon tax in this

1030
00:54:49.280 --> 00:54:54.000
<v Speaker 1>book but like immediately slashed it, like that's gone, because

1031
00:54:54.039 --> 00:55:00.639
<v Speaker 1>it presumably it's because of this confusion, right, because on

1032
00:55:00.760 --> 00:55:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the one end, like I'm seeing him here talking about

1033
00:55:04.679 --> 00:55:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the difference between subjective and intrinsic value. Now, so you

1034
00:55:07.960 --> 00:55:10.559
<v Speaker 1>can always just value as such a polysemic term. You

1035
00:55:10.599 --> 00:55:13.119
<v Speaker 1>can just take any two meanings of it and say

1036
00:55:13.159 --> 00:55:15.400
<v Speaker 1>these are opposed. Now to make this point, but whatever.

1037
00:55:16.320 --> 00:55:20.199
<v Speaker 1>So like carbon tax is like valuing something that has

1038
00:55:20.280 --> 00:55:24.079
<v Speaker 1>no market value, right, Like that's one of these sort

1039
00:55:24.119 --> 00:55:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of liberal environmentalist strategies. It's like, okay, well, what we

1040
00:55:28.920 --> 00:55:32.199
<v Speaker 1>need to do is just bring these things like forests

1041
00:55:32.280 --> 00:55:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and trees and oxygen capacities and carbon budgets whatever. We

1042
00:55:36.480 --> 00:55:39.000
<v Speaker 1>need to just bring these into the market, give them value,

1043
00:55:39.599 --> 00:55:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and then people will sort of trade them up and

1044
00:55:41.480 --> 00:55:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the market will like sort that out too, because that's

1045
00:55:43.880 --> 00:55:47.199
<v Speaker 1>what the market is best at doing, right, distributing resources

1046
00:55:47.440 --> 00:55:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in a condition of scarcity or limitedness, Right, that's like

1047
00:55:52.039 --> 00:55:55.280
<v Speaker 1>what the market is supposed to do according to mainstream economy.

1048
00:55:55.360 --> 00:55:58.039
<v Speaker 1>So that's the idea, right, But now that he's sort

1049
00:55:58.079 --> 00:56:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of so he seemed to be endorsing that by praising

1050
00:56:01.000 --> 00:56:03.599
<v Speaker 1>carbon tax, right, oh, by putting a price on carbon

1051
00:56:03.760 --> 00:56:07.280
<v Speaker 1>right now we're putting Now the invisible hand gets to

1052
00:56:07.360 --> 00:56:11.760
<v Speaker 1>play around with carbon too. But now he's rejected that.

1053
00:56:11.960 --> 00:56:15.639
<v Speaker 1>He's flipped around, he's seemed because I think the obvious

1054
00:56:15.719 --> 00:56:18.760
<v Speaker 1>answer to why is because it's very, very unpopular and

1055
00:56:19.039 --> 00:56:23.840
<v Speaker 1>very associated with the Trudeau previous government. So he gets

1056
00:56:23.920 --> 00:56:25.840
<v Speaker 1>rid of it. But then what does that say about.

1057
00:56:25.920 --> 00:56:28.119
<v Speaker 3>Well, we're worried about Alberta separation now too. If we

1058
00:56:28.239 --> 00:56:29.880
<v Speaker 3>take away their oil they're going to cry and leave

1059
00:56:29.960 --> 00:56:31.800
<v Speaker 3>Canada also. But that's a whole other story.

1060
00:56:31.599 --> 00:56:31.880
<v Speaker 2>I guess.

1061
00:56:32.079 --> 00:56:34.239
<v Speaker 4>But what does that say about his values?

1062
00:56:34.320 --> 00:56:37.719
<v Speaker 1>He can just change his perspective on something if this

1063
00:56:37.880 --> 00:56:42.199
<v Speaker 1>doesn't lay out like a view where oh, in this condition,

1064
00:56:42.400 --> 00:56:45.559
<v Speaker 1>carbon tax is bad, like when I'm trying to be

1065
00:56:45.760 --> 00:56:48.320
<v Speaker 1>prime minister, but under these other conditions, when I'm just

1066
00:56:48.360 --> 00:56:50.360
<v Speaker 1>an objective outside observer, they're good.

1067
00:56:51.119 --> 00:56:53.280
<v Speaker 4>Then oh, what other things is he going.

1068
00:56:53.199 --> 00:56:55.199
<v Speaker 1>To be able to look at from whichever's point of

1069
00:56:55.280 --> 00:56:58.760
<v Speaker 1>view serves him in the moment. I mean classic politician stuff,

1070
00:56:58.800 --> 00:56:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess, haha.

1071
00:56:59.639 --> 00:57:02.760
<v Speaker 2>But you know, can we explain real quick the carbon tax.

1072
00:57:03.159 --> 00:57:08.559
<v Speaker 2>It's a very hot button issue in Canada because conservatives

1073
00:57:08.639 --> 00:57:12.079
<v Speaker 2>it's their boogeyman. Their conservatives are obsessed with this thing.

1074
00:57:12.559 --> 00:57:19.519
<v Speaker 2>And it's basically just companies have to pay for carbon emissions,

1075
00:57:19.559 --> 00:57:22.440
<v Speaker 2>which is like taxing pollution. Basically.

1076
00:57:22.639 --> 00:57:25.000
<v Speaker 1>The States is familiar with it, isn't it called cap

1077
00:57:25.119 --> 00:57:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and trade everywhere and stuff too.

1078
00:57:27.079 --> 00:57:29.159
<v Speaker 3>But well there's different forms there, just cap and trade,

1079
00:57:29.159 --> 00:57:32.320
<v Speaker 3>and then there's also just like taxing it like regardless.

1080
00:57:32.559 --> 00:57:36.320
<v Speaker 1>But it's especially what I said is giving value on

1081
00:57:36.480 --> 00:57:39.519
<v Speaker 1>the market to things that don't have value. So trading

1082
00:57:39.599 --> 00:57:44.159
<v Speaker 1>your carbon budget, it's like offsetting your fucking carbon budget

1083
00:57:44.199 --> 00:57:46.039
<v Speaker 1>when you go on a plane and you pay that

1084
00:57:46.159 --> 00:57:48.639
<v Speaker 1>extra amount to offset your carbon and then you get

1085
00:57:48.679 --> 00:57:51.239
<v Speaker 1>to go around saying I produce zero carbon when I

1086
00:57:51.320 --> 00:57:56.880
<v Speaker 1>travel because apparently money cancels out carbon dioxide. The scientists

1087
00:57:57.039 --> 00:57:59.679
<v Speaker 1>found that out. Apparent Bill Gates is telling us all.

1088
00:58:01.000 --> 00:58:03.840
<v Speaker 2>But that's that's kind of signaling to the conservatives. Hey,

1089
00:58:04.559 --> 00:58:07.000
<v Speaker 2>the era, the woke Trudeau era is over.

1090
00:58:07.559 --> 00:58:08.679
<v Speaker 4>I often go over and.

1091
00:58:08.719 --> 00:58:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Look at you know, marginalism and try to like figure

1092
00:58:12.480 --> 00:58:14.480
<v Speaker 1>out I'm not good at it, but trying to figure

1093
00:58:14.480 --> 00:58:18.480
<v Speaker 1>out what mainstream economics is kind of all about since Marx,

1094
00:58:18.960 --> 00:58:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and just to at least just to read it so

1095
00:58:21.840 --> 00:58:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I know it, so I and it is and then

1096
00:58:23.800 --> 00:58:26.679
<v Speaker 1>I know, okay, this is very convincing stuff, Like you

1097
00:58:26.760 --> 00:58:29.760
<v Speaker 1>look at it like of course something is worth whatever,

1098
00:58:29.920 --> 00:58:33.280
<v Speaker 1>someone will pay for it. And like Marx actually addresses

1099
00:58:33.519 --> 00:58:37.360
<v Speaker 1>questions like that, and also the utility thing, right, like

1100
00:58:37.480 --> 00:58:41.880
<v Speaker 1>he's explains, you know, the marginalists go back not to

1101
00:58:43.440 --> 00:58:47.400
<v Speaker 1>a kind of John Stuart Mill welfare version of the economy,

1102
00:58:47.519 --> 00:58:51.119
<v Speaker 1>but like a Bentham utility version, right, So marginal utility,

1103
00:58:51.199 --> 00:58:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the utility part.

1104
00:58:52.400 --> 00:58:53.239
<v Speaker 4>Things are useful.

1105
00:58:53.599 --> 00:58:56.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, oh yeah, there's this concept in Marx.

1106
00:58:56.039 --> 00:58:56.559
<v Speaker 4>What's it called?

1107
00:58:56.599 --> 00:59:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, fucking use value. That's like very essentral to everything. Yeah,

1108
00:59:00.800 --> 00:59:03.599
<v Speaker 1>isn't Marx going on all the time about people conflating

1109
00:59:03.719 --> 00:59:06.599
<v Speaker 1>use value in exchange value, use value in exchange value,

1110
00:59:06.599 --> 00:59:10.280
<v Speaker 1>always getting fucking conflated. And then when he passes over

1111
00:59:10.639 --> 00:59:14.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, objective value to get to subjective values where

1112
00:59:14.159 --> 00:59:16.719
<v Speaker 1>he wants to be, he says, ah, utility, such a

1113
00:59:16.800 --> 00:59:19.960
<v Speaker 1>revolutionary idea. Nobody's thought of this before. And he doesn't

1114
00:59:20.000 --> 00:59:23.039
<v Speaker 1>say that, but I'm being sarcastic. But anyway, Yeah, looking

1115
00:59:23.079 --> 00:59:28.039
<v Speaker 1>at this stuff alongside Marx is both interesting and very

1116
00:59:28.119 --> 00:59:33.440
<v Speaker 1>frustrating because they're different. But yeah, he brings it all

1117
00:59:33.519 --> 00:59:36.199
<v Speaker 1>up just to dismiss it. Marx is classical economists.

1118
00:59:36.280 --> 00:59:36.840
<v Speaker 3>We moved on.

1119
00:59:37.719 --> 00:59:40.280
<v Speaker 2>That's the thing. Though he doesn't. He doesn't dismiss Marx

1120
00:59:40.320 --> 00:59:44.519
<v Speaker 2>while he's explaining Marx, right, he just he just never

1121
00:59:44.599 --> 00:59:47.400
<v Speaker 2>talks about it again, like I control I just control ft.

1122
00:59:47.519 --> 00:59:50.559
<v Speaker 2>And it's like the section on Marx and he never

1123
00:59:50.599 --> 00:59:53.039
<v Speaker 2>brings it up again except for the Communist Manifesto.

1124
00:59:54.320 --> 00:59:57.679
<v Speaker 1>So I say it was perfunctory. It was an obligatory

1125
00:59:57.960 --> 01:00:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, nods to the classics and then you move on.

1126
01:00:01.039 --> 01:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>That's like it's a it's just you know, omission by

1127
01:00:04.920 --> 01:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>by by just mentioning it and then moving on.

1128
01:00:08.440 --> 01:00:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Now he does bring it up. This is this is

1129
01:00:10.599 --> 01:00:13.519
<v Speaker 2>like the funniest uh. It's in the end he's talking

1130
01:00:13.559 --> 01:00:19.159
<v Speaker 2>about how companies need to take interest in their employees' lives,

1131
01:00:19.400 --> 01:00:21.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, in a way to give them transferable skills,

1132
01:00:22.679 --> 01:00:25.400
<v Speaker 2>in a way to make them happy. With their jobs,

1133
01:00:25.440 --> 01:00:28.400
<v Speaker 2>because a happy workforce is a happy country. Blah blah

1134
01:00:28.400 --> 01:00:31.400
<v Speaker 2>blah ah this shit. And he says if education is

1135
01:00:31.480 --> 01:00:34.920
<v Speaker 2>unable to keep pace with the changing demand for skills,

1136
01:00:35.199 --> 01:00:37.920
<v Speaker 2>those who already have them will earn even higher premiums,

1137
01:00:38.119 --> 01:00:41.119
<v Speaker 2>and job polarization will increase the supply of labor competing

1138
01:00:41.159 --> 01:00:44.199
<v Speaker 2>for lower skilled jobs. Now, this is obviously what we see.

1139
01:00:45.000 --> 01:00:48.800
<v Speaker 2>And then he says, finally, greater global interconnectedness will reinforce

1140
01:00:48.880 --> 01:00:51.800
<v Speaker 2>these dynamics. Of course we see that too, And then

1141
01:00:51.840 --> 01:00:53.960
<v Speaker 2>he says, this is my favorite line of the book.

1142
01:00:54.079 --> 01:00:56.840
<v Speaker 2>If this he's he's a he's a secret maoist. By

1143
01:00:56.840 --> 01:01:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the way, if this world of surplus labor comes to pass,

1144
01:01:00.840 --> 01:01:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Marx and Angeles could again become relevant. Is he predicting revolution?

1145
01:01:06.119 --> 01:01:09.920
<v Speaker 2>There on the.

1146
01:01:09.960 --> 01:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Basis of like a misunderstanding of something, I think.

1147
01:01:12.960 --> 01:01:14.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, he's predicting revolution.

1148
01:01:14.599 --> 01:01:17.360
<v Speaker 2>But then he says there are policy choices we can

1149
01:01:17.440 --> 01:01:20.920
<v Speaker 2>make and actions we can take to help shape this future.

1150
01:01:21.119 --> 01:01:23.000
<v Speaker 3>So then doesn't tell us what those are.

1151
01:01:23.280 --> 01:01:27.239
<v Speaker 2>No, but you know, he could be he's a their TBD.

1152
01:01:27.480 --> 01:01:30.880
<v Speaker 2>He could be a secret revolutionary based on that line.

1153
01:01:31.239 --> 01:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh, we'll find out. It's always the answer there, I guess,

1154
01:01:35.360 --> 01:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, it will be interesting to see if he

1155
01:01:38.960 --> 01:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>does anything different, which I have very little hope for

1156
01:01:42.039 --> 01:01:44.119
<v Speaker 1>because he's a banker.

1157
01:01:45.199 --> 01:01:48.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, at least it's not pure polyeff Yeah.

1158
01:01:50.440 --> 01:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Always always a bright side.

1159
01:01:52.480 --> 01:01:55.199
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of like you can just drop in out

1160
01:01:55.239 --> 01:01:58.559
<v Speaker 2>of nowhere and just get elected. You parachute in. You're

1161
01:01:58.559 --> 01:02:02.679
<v Speaker 2>not even in politics at your life. Yeah, the party

1162
01:02:03.320 --> 01:02:05.559
<v Speaker 2>I did. I don't have any idea how the leadership

1163
01:02:06.320 --> 01:02:09.400
<v Speaker 2>race went for this guy, but uh, oh it was.

1164
01:02:09.480 --> 01:02:11.920
<v Speaker 3>It was overwhelming for him, Like.

1165
01:02:12.039 --> 01:02:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Is he a compelling I haven't heard him speak, Is

1166
01:02:13.880 --> 01:02:18.320
<v Speaker 2>he compelling a speaker? Or do people just go, oh, holy,

1167
01:02:18.679 --> 01:02:20.159
<v Speaker 2>you're a banker, You're a genius.

1168
01:02:20.320 --> 01:02:21.639
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's Yeah, it's.

1169
01:02:21.559 --> 01:02:24.119
<v Speaker 3>Just that in comparison to Trump, he's just so normal

1170
01:02:24.199 --> 01:02:27.360
<v Speaker 3>in milk toast and like and like competent that people

1171
01:02:27.440 --> 01:02:30.079
<v Speaker 3>like competent seeming that people are just like, okay, like yes,

1172
01:02:31.039 --> 01:02:33.360
<v Speaker 3>this guy just feels like a politician from like the

1173
01:02:33.599 --> 01:02:36.599
<v Speaker 3>nineties and early two thousands, just like a normal, a

1174
01:02:36.719 --> 01:02:39.559
<v Speaker 3>normal elitist politician. And I guess there's maybe a hunger

1175
01:02:39.639 --> 01:02:39.800
<v Speaker 3>for that.

1176
01:02:41.079 --> 01:02:43.800
<v Speaker 4>And look like I think it's we're impressed with how

1177
01:02:43.880 --> 01:02:44.880
<v Speaker 4>he dealt with Trump.

1178
01:02:44.920 --> 01:02:47.679
<v Speaker 3>Him being a banker, like I like like like Eric,

1179
01:02:47.760 --> 01:02:49.320
<v Speaker 3>I was kind of like, ugh, like it's just going

1180
01:02:49.400 --> 01:02:51.920
<v Speaker 3>to be. But you know, in the very context we're

1181
01:02:51.960 --> 01:02:54.119
<v Speaker 3>in right now with Trump and watching them together, I

1182
01:02:54.199 --> 01:02:55.480
<v Speaker 3>kind of realized, I was like, God, it's good that

1183
01:02:55.519 --> 01:02:58.079
<v Speaker 3>he's a banker because Trump. It's like a class of

1184
01:02:58.159 --> 01:03:00.119
<v Speaker 3>person that Trump is going to like look up to

1185
01:03:00.280 --> 01:03:03.039
<v Speaker 3>and see as like as like as like legit.

1186
01:03:03.239 --> 01:03:06.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, you know that's interesting because I looked up

1187
01:03:07.119 --> 01:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>some of that and I thought, okay, banker. He's the

1188
01:03:11.039 --> 01:03:15.639
<v Speaker 1>first prime minister ever in Canada to have a banking background.

1189
01:03:15.840 --> 01:03:18.519
<v Speaker 1>Nobody else has had that. And I even looked at Europe,

1190
01:03:18.760 --> 01:03:22.159
<v Speaker 1>how many prime ministers or presidents have had banking backgrounds?

1191
01:03:22.559 --> 01:03:24.239
<v Speaker 4>Very few. You never see them.

1192
01:03:24.280 --> 01:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>The only times you see them are during crisis times

1193
01:03:27.239 --> 01:03:30.559
<v Speaker 1>like the Greek like the Greek financial crisis right then

1194
01:03:30.599 --> 01:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>they had I think it was an EU banker and

1195
01:03:34.400 --> 01:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Vera Faucus was involved somehow in that. He has some stories.

1196
01:03:37.760 --> 01:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, you'd never see bankers in power until like

1197
01:03:43.119 --> 01:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>these crisis points happen and everybody starts to then think,

1198
01:03:46.440 --> 01:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>like Victor, like glad we have a banker in there.

1199
01:03:49.559 --> 01:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>For various reasons not just impressed Trump, but that's one thing,

1200
01:03:53.360 --> 01:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>but also, you know, he's going to know that all

1201
01:03:55.960 --> 01:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the levers that he can pull to navigate us out

1202
01:03:58.800 --> 01:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of this problem, right, and like all those things we

1203
01:04:01.599 --> 01:04:03.719
<v Speaker 1>were talking about, well, he's going to do at least

1204
01:04:03.840 --> 01:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>if he's doing neoliberalism or some kind of modified Keenesianism,

1205
01:04:07.920 --> 01:04:11.199
<v Speaker 1>he's going to do the best fucking version of it possible.

1206
01:04:11.519 --> 01:04:14.599
<v Speaker 1>And if it still fails, then maybe we should finally

1207
01:04:14.639 --> 01:04:17.039
<v Speaker 1>give this shit up and go back and look at

1208
01:04:17.079 --> 01:04:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Marks again. No, I'm just kidding, but it'll be an

1209
01:04:19.719 --> 01:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>experiment for him to see how a banker runs a country,

1210
01:04:24.000 --> 01:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and we haven't seen many of those.

1211
01:04:26.159 --> 01:04:28.199
<v Speaker 3>To be fair, I'm not happy that he's a banker

1212
01:04:28.320 --> 01:04:30.559
<v Speaker 3>for any reason other than the fact that I think

1213
01:04:30.639 --> 01:04:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Trump will just like be more cooperative with him. All

1214
01:04:33.039 --> 01:04:34.320
<v Speaker 3>the other stuff I'm not happy about.

1215
01:04:34.519 --> 01:04:38.559
<v Speaker 2>Well, the downside is if he fails utterly, which I

1216
01:04:38.599 --> 01:04:41.039
<v Speaker 2>think should be our expectation. But if he fails utterly

1217
01:04:41.199 --> 01:04:43.400
<v Speaker 2>to a reverse course, the next prime minister is going

1218
01:04:43.480 --> 01:04:44.519
<v Speaker 2>to be a Nazi.

1219
01:04:46.199 --> 01:04:46.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1220
01:04:46.480 --> 01:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it'll be hard to blame though, because you know,

1221
01:04:49.119 --> 01:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>crisis prime ministers can always you know, the easiest thing

1222
01:04:52.440 --> 01:04:54.599
<v Speaker 1>to blame on someone else. It's like I took over

1223
01:04:54.679 --> 01:04:55.239
<v Speaker 1>during a crisis.

1224
01:04:55.280 --> 01:04:57.559
<v Speaker 3>Australia just had an election in the Labor Party one

1225
01:04:57.639 --> 01:05:02.079
<v Speaker 3>overwhelmingly because they're Conservative party. Leader was basically like a

1226
01:05:02.119 --> 01:05:05.719
<v Speaker 3>populist fascist, and even the previous prime minister, I think

1227
01:05:05.760 --> 01:05:07.800
<v Speaker 3>it was the previous for the one before who was

1228
01:05:07.960 --> 01:05:09.880
<v Speaker 3>a part of the Liberal Party, which there is their

1229
01:05:09.920 --> 01:05:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Conservative party. He like, he was interviewed recently and it

1230
01:05:14.840 --> 01:05:16.280
<v Speaker 3>was an amazing clip and he was like, what do

1231
01:05:16.320 --> 01:05:17.559
<v Speaker 3>you think about it? I think the guy's name is

1232
01:05:17.559 --> 01:05:21.719
<v Speaker 3>Tim Dutton or something, the kind of populist far right flavor,

1233
01:05:21.960 --> 01:05:26.079
<v Speaker 3>you know. And the former leader of the same party,

1234
01:05:26.239 --> 01:05:28.079
<v Speaker 3>the Liberal Party, was asked like, what do you think

1235
01:05:28.079 --> 01:05:32.119
<v Speaker 3>about this Dutton guy becoming prime minister and he said,

1236
01:05:32.159 --> 01:05:35.039
<v Speaker 3>I think it would be a catastrophe for a multicultural

1237
01:05:35.079 --> 01:05:37.480
<v Speaker 3>country like Australia to elect a guy like that guy

1238
01:05:37.559 --> 01:05:38.360
<v Speaker 3>from his own party.

1239
01:05:38.599 --> 01:05:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

1240
01:05:39.679 --> 01:05:41.639
<v Speaker 3>And then he got trounced our Liberal Party.

1241
01:05:41.679 --> 01:05:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, our Labor Party got absolutely eviscerated. So if

1242
01:05:46.400 --> 01:05:47.480
<v Speaker 2>he fails, maybe they.

1243
01:05:47.639 --> 01:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>But their Labor Party is a different place on the spectrum.

1244
01:05:51.880 --> 01:05:53.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, their Labor Party is are Liberal Party.

1245
01:05:53.760 --> 01:05:54.159
<v Speaker 2>I see.

1246
01:05:54.360 --> 01:05:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're pretty equivalent. But no, it's like a bit

1247
01:05:57.280 --> 01:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of a Trump wave, right, a Trump a Trump reaction.

1248
01:06:00.159 --> 01:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>There's still a swing to the right happening. But then

1249
01:06:02.320 --> 01:06:06.559
<v Speaker 1>there's these little Canada, Australia, a little little reactions.

1250
01:06:06.719 --> 01:06:08.119
<v Speaker 3>Just once you see what it's like to have a

1251
01:06:08.199 --> 01:06:09.920
<v Speaker 3>clown like Trump, you're kind of like, shit, I don't

1252
01:06:09.920 --> 01:06:10.199
<v Speaker 3>want that.

1253
01:06:11.360 --> 01:06:14.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but if he fails, right, if he fails with

1254
01:06:14.679 --> 01:06:18.119
<v Speaker 2>his like finger wagging at the corporations, and if they

1255
01:06:18.199 --> 01:06:22.079
<v Speaker 2>don't do it, inequality increases. Like you, you have to

1256
01:06:22.679 --> 01:06:25.280
<v Speaker 2>do something different, you have to. So I'm not sure

1257
01:06:25.360 --> 01:06:26.960
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be a Nazi, but it has to

1258
01:06:27.000 --> 01:06:28.000
<v Speaker 2>be something different.

1259
01:06:28.519 --> 01:06:30.119
<v Speaker 3>Well, we're gonna get hopefully we'll get a new leader

1260
01:06:30.159 --> 01:06:32.719
<v Speaker 3>of the NDP Our Liberal our Labor Party, and maybe

1261
01:06:32.800 --> 01:06:35.679
<v Speaker 3>that'll that'll be like an interesting you know. I look

1262
01:06:35.719 --> 01:06:37.440
<v Speaker 3>forward to seeing that. It was time for that Jag

1263
01:06:37.559 --> 01:06:39.639
<v Speaker 3>Meet Sing guy to go. I was sick of them. Somehow,

1264
01:06:39.639 --> 01:06:41.079
<v Speaker 3>I'm happy that they're they're going to get some new

1265
01:06:41.119 --> 01:06:41.639
<v Speaker 3>blood in there.

1266
01:06:42.280 --> 01:06:44.639
<v Speaker 2>It's uh, yeah, it could be, could be.

1267
01:06:44.880 --> 01:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this is the new political spectrum. Forget the

1268
01:06:47.559 --> 01:06:49.679
<v Speaker 1>left and right, It's going to be the clown the

1269
01:06:50.079 --> 01:06:54.199
<v Speaker 1>Nazi clowns. Versus the bankers. From here on, that's it.

1270
01:06:54.480 --> 01:06:57.679
<v Speaker 1>There's no more, no more of those fucking lawyer politicians,

1271
01:06:57.880 --> 01:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>no more of those career politicians. Clowns and bankers.

1272
01:07:02.119 --> 01:07:04.679
<v Speaker 3>Clowns and bankers. That's that's good.

1273
01:07:05.079 --> 01:07:09.559
<v Speaker 2>Clowns and bankers, our new political spectrum. Stuck in the

1274
01:07:09.599 --> 01:07:13.320
<v Speaker 2>middle with you. I just I don't understand how smart

1275
01:07:13.360 --> 01:07:18.039
<v Speaker 2>people are also just so stupid. Maybe I'm like said,

1276
01:07:18.519 --> 01:07:19.880
<v Speaker 2>maybe I'm the stupid one, but like.

1277
01:07:20.039 --> 01:07:23.800
<v Speaker 3>I think I like your theory though, Pills. I think

1278
01:07:23.920 --> 01:07:26.719
<v Speaker 3>I think it might have been a self conscious choice

1279
01:07:26.760 --> 01:07:28.920
<v Speaker 3>to write something kind of milk toast because he wants

1280
01:07:28.960 --> 01:07:30.159
<v Speaker 3>to be prime minister one day.

1281
01:07:30.840 --> 01:07:34.159
<v Speaker 2>Well he he, He wants to avoid the revolution, and

1282
01:07:34.239 --> 01:07:37.000
<v Speaker 2>he thinks we can avoid the revolution with policy, which

1283
01:07:37.079 --> 01:07:39.119
<v Speaker 2>is true, you know, but it has to be some

1284
01:07:39.880 --> 01:07:43.519
<v Speaker 2>some pretty heavy handed policy. We'll see, we'll see what happens.

1285
01:07:43.519 --> 01:07:44.760
<v Speaker 2>It's exciting times.

1286
01:07:45.000 --> 01:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>That's right, that's right, don't violate market integrity, but do.

1287
01:07:48.559 --> 01:07:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Anything else quick aside. I'm enjoying on Twitter, like all

1288
01:07:52.440 --> 01:07:54.840
<v Speaker 3>the like far right reactionaries are like kind of being

1289
01:07:55.000 --> 01:07:59.480
<v Speaker 3>are a bit disappointed about the pope, like like I

1290
01:07:59.519 --> 01:08:02.280
<v Speaker 3>saw mill in like Michael Miller and for example, says

1291
01:08:02.840 --> 01:08:05.639
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't seem like much of a conservative or reactionary,

1292
01:08:05.719 --> 01:08:08.000
<v Speaker 3>which I suppose is a disappointment for many of you.

1293
01:08:08.960 --> 01:08:09.599
<v Speaker 3>But we'll see.

1294
01:08:09.719 --> 01:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh good, maybe that'll distract him from the clear gazzo references.

1295
01:08:13.480 --> 01:08:16.720
<v Speaker 3>In and or in this, and Alex Jones was just saying,

1296
01:08:17.640 --> 01:08:19.319
<v Speaker 3>was tweeting about how this pope is going to be

1297
01:08:19.439 --> 01:08:22.640
<v Speaker 3>like used by the deep state to undermine Trump.

1298
01:08:23.439 --> 01:08:26.439
<v Speaker 2>Oh well, they're gonna have to send JD to kill him.

1299
01:08:26.880 --> 01:08:29.439
<v Speaker 1>This in the bond market is the deep state anyway.

1300
01:08:29.560 --> 01:08:31.560
<v Speaker 3>So there are a lot of these tweets emerging of

1301
01:08:31.720 --> 01:08:34.000
<v Speaker 3>the actual the new pope when he was just whatever,

1302
01:08:34.000 --> 01:08:37.560
<v Speaker 3>a cardinal and his last retweet was actually like lambasting

1303
01:08:37.600 --> 01:08:40.720
<v Speaker 3>the Trump administration. And also he wrote a tweet like

1304
01:08:40.840 --> 01:08:43.159
<v Speaker 3>saying that j. D Man's is wrong about Jesus Christ,

1305
01:08:45.439 --> 01:08:47.520
<v Speaker 3>so oh perfect.

1306
01:08:47.800 --> 01:08:51.880
<v Speaker 2>The group of bishops or whomever said, like JD is

1307
01:08:52.199 --> 01:08:55.520
<v Speaker 2>is wrong about his interpretation of Catholicism. Isn't that a

1308
01:08:55.600 --> 01:08:59.279
<v Speaker 2>big deal for the Catholics, Like if the church denounces you,

1309
01:08:59.640 --> 01:09:03.800
<v Speaker 2>you have a problem. Yeah, I guess the far right

1310
01:09:03.920 --> 01:09:06.880
<v Speaker 2>wing of the Catholic Church didn't really recognize Francis as

1311
01:09:06.920 --> 01:09:07.840
<v Speaker 2>the true pope or whatever.

1312
01:09:07.880 --> 01:09:08.640
<v Speaker 3>We know, that's the thing.

1313
01:09:08.640 --> 01:09:11.159
<v Speaker 2>And I think thought this was really like a serious

1314
01:09:11.239 --> 01:09:13.680
<v Speaker 2>part of their religion is like to have the picture

1315
01:09:13.720 --> 01:09:14.119
<v Speaker 2>of the pope.

1316
01:09:14.199 --> 01:09:16.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's why they were hoping for someone like really

1317
01:09:16.880 --> 01:09:19.640
<v Speaker 3>like out there, like like a hardcore traditionalist, and I

1318
01:09:19.680 --> 01:09:20.800
<v Speaker 3>don't think they did. That guy came.

1319
01:09:21.199 --> 01:09:24.279
<v Speaker 2>Well, the option that they had was an African guy

1320
01:09:24.359 --> 01:09:26.319
<v Speaker 2>who is hardcore. But he's also African.

1321
01:09:26.479 --> 01:09:29.479
<v Speaker 3>So there's another American who's also pretty hard core. Who

1322
01:09:29.600 --> 01:09:32.479
<v Speaker 3>is who is who is being talked about? A different American? Right?

1323
01:09:32.600 --> 01:09:35.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, we live in fun times.

1324
01:09:35.560 --> 01:09:36.720
<v Speaker 3>We do live in fun times.

1325
01:09:37.239 --> 01:09:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Next week we will get back to Merlo Pontian Buddhism. Yeah,

1326
01:09:42.640 --> 01:09:46.800
<v Speaker 2>all right, take care of you guys, see ye till

1327
01:09:46.880 --> 01:09:47.279
<v Speaker 2>next time.
