Speaker 1: Get ready for.
Speaker 2: April second, twenty twenty five. Allegedly, according to that thing
Speaker 2: we call a calendar. This the o'celly effect. You listening
Speaker 2: to me wherever you are, whenever you are, and all
Speaker 2: that good stuff. Anyway, Wodnesday or Wednesday, and it's the
Speaker 2: middle of a week, no guest tonight. In fact, I
Speaker 2: don't even want to really read off the news to you,
Speaker 2: but I have been collecting it over the weekend and
Speaker 2: on April Fool's Day and all that good stuff. So
Speaker 2: here we are. There it was, and this is the
Speaker 2: week that's been passed packed into the past couple of days.
Speaker 2: Before I go any further, couple of things. One, I
Speaker 2: am still taking info at ocelly dot com. I am
Speaker 2: taking submissions for articles that will begin their run on
Speaker 2: April seventh. In we're gonna have a new front page
Speaker 2: feature and I'm gonna call it the Weekly Reader. So
Speaker 2: not sure if we're gonna call it the Ocelli Effect
Speaker 2: weekly Reader or weekly Reader, Ocelli effect or something like that.
Speaker 2: An homage to that little mini magazine that we would
Speaker 2: get in grade school that apparently stop printing some time ago.
Speaker 2: And uh, maybe I'll get into that story. I don't know.
Speaker 2: I'm thinking about publishing it as part of the explanation
Speaker 2: before I get into the first couple of articles. And
Speaker 2: what you'll get is one or two articles a week
Speaker 2: from the FrontPage at ocelly dot com. That simple. They
Speaker 2: might be multimedia, they might not. It depends on what
Speaker 2: the authors submit. And I am looking for rarefied ideas.
Speaker 2: So you're somebody who's got an editorial you want to write,
Speaker 2: you want to tell me a story, you want to
Speaker 2: take the time to break something down. Don't give me
Speaker 2: a news story of the day. Give me something that
Speaker 2: we can chew on a while and send it to
Speaker 2: info at oceelly dot com and put in the subject
Speaker 2: on the email submission, and that way I'll know what
Speaker 2: it is and I'll know how to handle it. And
Speaker 2: I'm the only one who handles info at ocelly dot com. Okay,
Speaker 2: So the past couple of days, you know what I
Speaker 2: went looking for. Is one of these nights, I was
Speaker 2: perusing the news speeds and I caught a replay on
Speaker 2: a stream of a news show where Kevin O'Leary, the
Speaker 2: guy from Shark Tank, was on there, and he started
Speaker 2: talking about Trump's tariffs and how he's facing him, and
Speaker 2: what he thinks of the strategy, et cetera. Because he's,
Speaker 2: you know, on Shark Tank, so therefore a financial genius.
Speaker 2: Of course, he's the guy who always wants to license things,
Speaker 2: never quite buy the company, but always buy a big
Speaker 2: share of what the company's gonna do. That guy, the
Speaker 2: bald guy, they call him mister Wonderful, I think that's
Speaker 2: his nickname. Anyway, that guy was on CNN and he
Speaker 2: went through a whole thing that made it sound to
Speaker 2: me like he was listening to one of my news
Speaker 2: shows discussing the signal and the Noise. Now, of course
Speaker 2: I did it in a funny way to refer to
Speaker 2: the signal chat and also to talk about the methodology
Speaker 2: behind the concept of the signal and the noise and
Speaker 2: separating the two things. O'Leary sounded like he was quoting
Speaker 2: me on CNN. So I decided to go find the clip,
Speaker 2: right and guess what, couldn't find it. It wasn't on
Speaker 2: the CNN YouTube channel. I didn't find it on CNN
Speaker 2: dot com. Now, granted I didn't search for it real hard,
Speaker 2: but I know the host that was interviewing him. I
Speaker 2: know it was him, and I know the date, and
Speaker 2: I have it in my notes, and yet I don't
Speaker 2: see it being replayed outside of them replaying it for
Speaker 2: air on the cable network. So I don't know. Maybe
Speaker 2: that video will pop up, or maybe it already hasn't.
Speaker 2: I missed it, So I'm gonna try and find it
Speaker 2: and see if we can compare it to what I
Speaker 2: was saying on the show recently, because I always find
Speaker 2: it funny when people wind up repeating things after I've
Speaker 2: done it, but their consultants are correspondence, or there's somebody
Speaker 2: who's popular on one of the cable news channels or
Speaker 2: all of them, you know, depending right, and they seem
Speaker 2: to have the same ideas that came out of my
Speaker 2: mouth some days earlier, just saying anyway, a couple of
Speaker 2: things did happen over the past few days and over
Speaker 2: the past week really, but since the last time I
Speaker 2: decided to do a new show. How about that It
Speaker 2: is Liberation Day. Hey, hey, it's Liberation Day. And what
Speaker 2: the paper's going to say, Well, got to tell you
Speaker 2: there's a lot of things going on. The restaurant might
Speaker 2: be a thing of the past. Yes, I said, breast
Speaker 2: urn and eggflation is a new word apparently, record philibuster
Speaker 2: from Booker, you know in the Senate, and also Iceman,
Speaker 2: Jim Morrison and Batman died from pneumonia on April Fool's Day.
Speaker 2: You're wondering, has O'Kelly lost his mind? Well, on the
Speaker 2: big day of tariffs? What do we got? Polls and
Speaker 2: voters seemed to be okay with all this. By the way,
Speaker 2: that special election in two different districts in Florida went
Speaker 2: pretty well. Another special election went pretty well. I guess
Speaker 2: Elon failed to achieve a grand objective pumping millions of
Speaker 2: dollars into some judges race where he said the future
Speaker 2: of America was to be decided there, and then as
Speaker 2: soon as the next day goes by, it's out of
Speaker 2: the news cycle. He's not screaming about it one way
Speaker 2: or the other. I don't know what any of that means.
Speaker 2: But what the papers say on April first, that was
Speaker 2: a headline out of the Independent. And what did they
Speaker 2: want to talk about? Well, Gofrey, Virginia Goufrey, Okay, she
Speaker 2: got into a bad car accident. She was saying a
Speaker 2: couple of days ago that she thought she might die
Speaker 2: pretty soon. But val Kilmer did die and apparently had
Speaker 2: a ten year bout of throat cancer, finally died of
Speaker 2: pneumonia on guess what, April Fool's Day. The judge dismissed
Speaker 2: the Eric Adams case right, denying a DOJ an opportunity
Speaker 2: to revive it later. That happened according to Politico and
Speaker 2: everywhere else on the interwebs, And of course that was
Speaker 2: dismissed without or with prejudice, excuse me. And that's sort
Speaker 2: of not a happy circumstance for the DOJ. But don't worry.
Speaker 2: They've got to work around lawyers always do a top
Speaker 2: nominee to be general and somebody who's going to be
Speaker 2: part of the joint Jeeves's staff, I guess it looked
Speaker 2: like anyway, apparently is denying that he was wearing a
Speaker 2: Maga hat in some circumstance recently. And I don't know why.
Speaker 2: That is a freaking headline. Also, the end of Hooters happening? Okay,
Speaker 2: can the restaurants survive? Well, let's go take a look
Speaker 2: at it. It's a story in the enemy journal called
Speaker 2: The Atlantic, and maybe I'll go get that and read
Speaker 2: a little bit from it. But before we even go there,
Speaker 2: how about this, Let's tune to Fox News, the official
Speaker 2: state media channel at this point, and see what they
Speaker 2: had to say about Trump, the election cycles, how the
Speaker 2: polls are going, and all that is America loving this likeness?
Speaker 2: What dot I'm loving it? According to McDonald's and there
Speaker 2: was a guy who made a song called McDonald Trump.
Speaker 2: I don't have that queued up, but I do have
Speaker 2: this queued up. So let's take a listen.
Speaker 3: Welcome back to Sunday night in America. There's good news,
Speaker 3: bad news. Which do you want?
Speaker 4: First?
Speaker 3: A new Fox poll has good news for Donald Trump.
Speaker 3: His approval rating is forty nine percent, which is an
Speaker 3: all time high. The same poll, however, shows angst among
Speaker 3: Americans about the economy. Seventy one percent of those surveyed
Speaker 3: predict a recession this year. On tariff's in particular, President
Speaker 3: Trump will impose a twenty five percent tariff on imported vehicles.
Speaker 3: Here's the president on the benefits.
Speaker 2: Okay, I'm gonna let Trump speak here, but obviously we're
Speaker 2: a day behind because tariff Day has already arrived. And
Speaker 2: this was from Sunday on Fox News. So let's see
Speaker 2: what he was saying about it on Let's see on Sunday,
Speaker 2: although it looks like they might be referring to a
Speaker 2: statement made this past Wednesday, as in last Wednesday. Are
Speaker 2: you confused yet? Anyway, twenty five percent auto tariffs was
Speaker 2: what was being proposed and floated around. And here's what
Speaker 2: Fox allowed Trump to say on their air about it.
Speaker 5: This is gonna lead to the construction of a lot
Speaker 5: of a lot of plants and a lot of this case,
Speaker 5: auto plants, and you're gonna see numbers like you haven't
Speaker 5: seen both in terms of employment.
Speaker 2: Takes a little while.
Speaker 5: You're gonna have great construction numbers initially, and then you're
Speaker 5: gonna have ultimately you're.
Speaker 6: Gonna have a lot of people making a.
Speaker 7: Lot of cars.
Speaker 2: The President is preaching, Okay, so they're gonna get into
Speaker 2: backing the president's story some more. That's what he had
Speaker 2: to say. Of course, he gave a speech to union
Speaker 2: workers today. Uh and today was what Liberation Day, the
Speaker 2: day that he's going to impose all these tariffs, and
Speaker 2: he did about ten percent on the entirety of the world.
Speaker 2: And then in some places it's a lot worse, like
Speaker 2: in Vietnam, where apparently if we take a good look
Speaker 2: at it. What do we got? Let's see, let's compare
Speaker 2: real fast before I get into some of the other
Speaker 2: stories I want to get into, because I got many
Speaker 2: an area to get to today. But yeah, Vietnam is apparently,
Speaker 2: let's see here, Vietnam is apparently going to experience forty
Speaker 2: five percent tariffs and they might be asking, is this
Speaker 2: a new American war of aggression forty five percent tariffs
Speaker 2: on Vietnam because they've been a much cheaper go to
Speaker 2: place than China as of late for manufacturing cheap goods,
Speaker 2: so they're getting hit Anyway, looks like we got Fox
Speaker 2: News with a couple of interesting clips of his speech today,
Speaker 2: the Liberation Day speech, So why don't we just go
Speaker 2: to those and maybe I'll end up having to put
Speaker 2: up with the announcer.
Speaker 5: We're going to build our future with American hands, with
Speaker 5: American heart, American steel, and we're going to build it
Speaker 5: with American pride like we used to. We're approaching our
Speaker 5: one hundredth day as president and have been given credit
Speaker 5: by a lot of people. Actually, even some of the
Speaker 5: fake news, can you believe it? Which in this case
Speaker 5: hopefully isn't fake For having done more in that time
Speaker 5: than any other administration in the history of our country.
Speaker 2: In the first one hundred days, I think we've had
Speaker 2: an amazing in terms.
Speaker 5: Of what we've done, what we've gotten accomplished.
Speaker 2: There you go these swoosh noise from Fox News, so
Speaker 2: you know it's serious, and that's one way to look
Speaker 2: at it. Jacked up prices, increased prices on cars, new
Speaker 2: used parts, everything is another way to look at it,
Speaker 2: because that's what it's going to do in the market
Speaker 2: unless manufacturers decide to eat these things. And I don't know,
Speaker 2: my experience has never been to see an entire industry
Speaker 2: eat right risen costs. I mean, take a look at
Speaker 2: the gasoline industry, pivotal, what do they do the second
Speaker 2: there's a panic, before any condition sets in, even at
Speaker 2: the pumps. I illustrated this many times on the show.
Speaker 2: They immediately hit us with stuff. But let's give Trump
Speaker 2: a little more raw.
Speaker 5: Ross base because we are being very kind. We're kind people,
Speaker 5: very kind. They're not so kind when you got ripped
Speaker 5: off with your salaries. My autoworker friends and my cheepster friends,
Speaker 5: and all of the unions that typically voted Democrat they're
Speaker 5: not voting Democrat anymore because the worker, whether union or
Speaker 5: non worker, they're for the Republicans.
Speaker 2: Now that's what happened there. You go, So another Fox
Speaker 2: News excerpt to show you that great leader is in
Speaker 2: great control and that's the way that is. But is
Speaker 2: he in control of his CIA? I mean, is he
Speaker 2: in better control of the CIA than Kennedy was? Or
Speaker 2: are they in control of him? You can ask these
Speaker 2: questions openly, can't you? Anyway? Maybe you can, maybe you can't. Again,
Speaker 2: Corey Booker, with his marathon speech ranks among the Senate's longest.
Speaker 2: I'm not sure if he's set a complete record there
Speaker 2: for the longest, but they said he did twenty five hours.
Speaker 2: And to tell you the truth, even though I sit
Speaker 2: and torture myself with a lot of stuff, I can't
Speaker 2: handle hanging with Corey Booker talking for twenty five hours.
Speaker 2: It ain't going to work. We could talk about the
Speaker 2: Trump family cashing in on Crypto and how well that's worked,
Speaker 2: But then it can if you listen to my show,
Speaker 2: you already know this, don't you. Journalists consider a briefing
Speaker 2: room sit in as Trump clashes with the White House,
Speaker 2: a press corps over what the correspondence dinners seating and nonsense,
Speaker 2: and like I said, they're almost completely ignoring Virginia Goufrey
Speaker 2: and her story the bad car accident, but they didn't
Speaker 2: totally ignore Oliver Stone and him speaking to Congress along
Speaker 2: with Jefferson Morley and Jim D. Eugenio yesterday. I want
Speaker 2: to play you my favorite highlight, but I can't get
Speaker 2: to that first, because first I got to let to
Speaker 2: Eugenios speak to a Democratic representative that had a chip
Speaker 2: on her shoulder and a democratic agenda to throw in there,
Speaker 2: because there was plenty of grandstanding and nonsense and let
Speaker 2: me make my points. And oh, by the way, my
Speaker 2: staffers are carrying giant posters of gotchas, so get ready,
Speaker 2: here I come. And that was the Republican but the
Speaker 2: Democratic lady wanted to have an attitude problem and be
Speaker 2: pissed off because in the declassification that went on regarding
Speaker 2: the JFK stuff, some people's solid security numbers got exposed,
Speaker 2: and that does suck. But of course it was done
Speaker 2: fast and sloppy because Trump allowed this stuff to be
Speaker 2: held onto in twenty seventeen and it didn't go through
Speaker 2: the normal process, because hardly anybody believed that he or
Speaker 2: anybody else would have the balls to even release the
Speaker 2: limited amount of information that they did. And still we're
Speaker 2: going through it, by the way, and there were new
Speaker 2: releases over the course of the week. But sadly, I
Speaker 2: got to turn to Jim de Eugenio to let him
Speaker 2: lead this off and in exchange with that Democratic congress
Speaker 2: person before I get to my favorite highlight of yesterday's hearings.
Speaker 8: All right, that bullet was turned over to the FBI
Speaker 8: at nine to twenty that night. Okay, nine, Well, here's
Speaker 8: the problem. Frasier, who was the FBI ballistics expert, had
Speaker 8: the bullet at seven thirty five. How on earth can
Speaker 8: you have a bullet that hasn't been delivered into the
Speaker 8: into the White House, because that's where the exchange took place.
Speaker 2: See Eugenio is pointing out very valid problems with the
Speaker 2: chains of custody and the evidence regarding the Kennedy assassination,
Speaker 2: and CE three ninety nine of course had to come up,
Speaker 2: and Oliver Stone tried to go to the old standard
Speaker 2: and EUGENI kind of had to scrape up and save
Speaker 2: him there because Ali did not seem as sharp as
Speaker 2: he used to be. Got to say that about him
Speaker 2: because I'm open and honest about those sorts of criticisms.
Speaker 2: I'd still love to hear from you, mister Stone at
Speaker 2: the Lancer Conference, as I offered on Twitter, when you
Speaker 2: said you didn't understand what was happening regarding a couple things,
Speaker 2: and I told you stop, buy the Lancer Conference, and
Speaker 2: I'll be more than happy to buy you a drink
Speaker 2: of choice or share one of mine with you and
Speaker 2: go over the thing you don't understand about what's happening
Speaker 2: with our government currently. But they were nice to him
Speaker 2: about his military service. I got to give him that.
Speaker 2: But let's hear a little more from Jim d and
Speaker 2: this lady from Gee. I'm not sure she's the one
Speaker 2: who was talking about governor hot wheels, or maybe it's
Speaker 2: a different one. Let's find out.
Speaker 8: So that's one of the big problems. And I could
Speaker 8: go on for two hours on what's wrong. Would CE
Speaker 8: three ninety nine as a piece of evidence. I don't
Speaker 8: think any just attorney in the United States would even
Speaker 8: try and submit C. Three nine nine because it would
Speaker 8: blow up in your face. I'm concerning the medical heat
Speaker 8: that he mentioned.
Speaker 2: Now Deugenio is going to get into medical witnesses and
Speaker 2: the contradiction between Parkland Hospital and Bethesda. And of course,
Speaker 2: you know, a bunch of people saw a big blowout
Speaker 2: in the back of the head, yet that was not reported,
Speaker 2: that was redacted, that was withheld. Nobody wanted to look
Speaker 2: at that, et cetera, et cetera. But it seems strange
Speaker 2: to me that they were litigating minutia here in some
Speaker 2: cases and in other cases, Jefferson Morley had to repeatedly
Speaker 2: tell them even though I'm a liberal Democrat, that's what
Speaker 2: he calls himself. I don't know how he calls himself
Speaker 2: a liberal Democrat. But in between having to tell them, listen,
Speaker 2: I don't want to get involved in your partisan discussions
Speaker 2: here today, but I am a liberal Democrat, he says,
Speaker 2: even though he, just like everybody else, has to kiss
Speaker 2: the ass of Donald Trump repeatedly during these hearings because
Speaker 2: thank you to thank you, President Trump. I'm glad you
Speaker 2: did something. Thank you, President Trump. I'm glad you finally
Speaker 2: allowed the release of things after twenty five plus years
Speaker 2: because you stopped it the last time, which, by the way,
Speaker 2: somebody did take the time to describe again, almost seeming
Speaker 2: like they were listening to me on Clyde Lewis in
Speaker 2: their explanation about how basically, you know, Trump and Biden
Speaker 2: did the same thing, except Biden kind of did worse
Speaker 2: with the delaying of the release of stuff from the ARRB.
Speaker 2: I give credit where credits due, but why it is
Speaker 2: we have to constantly praise, praise, praise, praise, kiss his
Speaker 2: ass and praise. Let's get on with the real business,
Speaker 2: especially when you're cutting it down to five minutes, and
Speaker 2: all I really wish, especially these Democrats during this hearing,
Speaker 2: you know, between the Republicans taking time to kiss Trump's
Speaker 2: ass and the Democrats taking time to try and score
Speaker 2: points against Doge and Elon Musk and whatever the hell
Speaker 2: else they had on their stupid agenda. Hey, why don't
Speaker 2: you bring that to a different committee outside of this one.
Speaker 2: You know you got an hour, use your hour wisely?
Speaker 2: What am I saying? I'm asking people in the Congress
Speaker 2: to use time wisely? I'm sorry. Let's go back to
Speaker 2: Jim de Eugenio.
Speaker 8: In the House elect Committee Volumes volume seven, page thirty seven,
Speaker 8: you will see a quote saying that the witnesses at
Speaker 8: Bethesda did not see this blown out back of the
Speaker 8: skull which your witnesses at Parkland Hospital saw, which is
Speaker 8: strongly indicative of a shot from the front. All right, well,
Speaker 8: this is what happened when the LARB declassified all the
Speaker 8: medical files from the House Select Committee on Assassinations. That
Speaker 8: turned out to be a lie because as many people
Speaker 8: at Bethesda saw this blown out back of the skull
Speaker 8: as saw it at Parkland, there's I think twenty one
Speaker 8: and twenty one, so you have a grand total of people, can.
Speaker 2: Forty two people?
Speaker 8: I'll be wrong, you know, I mean, that's just defies imagination.
Speaker 1: Four hundred and thirty five people are oft and wrong
Speaker 1: with that.
Speaker 2: That's God, that's Congress, right, mister Burchett makes the Joe Okay,
Speaker 2: four hundred and thirty two people, get me wrong, that's Congress. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: the Republican. At least he's being loose about it and
Speaker 2: not wasting a ton of our time. But for time wasters,
Speaker 2: let's turn to the next two interactions with the committee.
Speaker 9: Thank you, mister Burchette. Miss Lee, you're now recognized for
Speaker 9: five minutes.
Speaker 10: Thank you, Madam Chair and our ranking member Garcia for
Speaker 10: convening today's hearing, and thank you so much for the
Speaker 10: witnesses for being here. I don't want this task force
Speaker 10: to get drawn too far down the conspiracy theory rabbit
Speaker 10: hole when we convene these hearings, because the reality of
Speaker 10: the CIA's pass action is troubling on its own. This
Speaker 10: dump of documents alone showed evidence of illegal surveillance break ins,
Speaker 10: overstepping of authority.
Speaker 2: Okay, miss Lee is correct so far. By the way,
Speaker 2: she's a Misslee, ms period Lee. I don't know where
Speaker 2: she represents. I thought she was the one that did
Speaker 2: Governor hot Wheels there, but no, she spoke later the
Speaker 2: Governor hot Wheels lady. But this one's got the attitude problem.
Speaker 2: I'm not going to go into conspiracy theory here, you
Speaker 2: and your conspiracy theories, but let me get to my
Speaker 2: democratic agenda with an attitude, because this is productive.
Speaker 10: We've even got specific instructions on how to wiretap, including
Speaker 10: how to use certain chemicals to create markings on phones
Speaker 10: to tip off SPIZE. But we already knew this was happening,
Speaker 10: and we knew that the CIA committed human rights abuses
Speaker 10: and illegally sarveiled people, which is why the work to
Speaker 10: classifying these documents is so important. We've got to have
Speaker 10: transparency right so that we can learn to do better,
Speaker 10: so that we can hold agencies accountable.
Speaker 2: And so our agencies can learn not to get caughts
Speaker 2: often and yeah, okay, that's right, representatively, could please continue.
Speaker 10: But being reckless with this sensitive information is also not
Speaker 10: the way to do it. Declassifying documents around the assassinations
Speaker 10: of President Kennedy and Martin Luther King Junior is a
Speaker 10: serious matter, and we owe it to the American people
Speaker 10: to get it right. Unfortunately, the rollout of documents we've
Speaker 10: seen so far has been sloppy and rushed. The release
Speaker 10: didn't really give us a smoking gun, but it did
Speaker 10: produce a plenty of collateral damage. Trump's actions have jeopardized
Speaker 10: the safety and security of hundreds of formal, congressional and
Speaker 10: federal employees by releasing their social security numbers in personal
Speaker 10: information to the public and for what to score political
Speaker 10: points by rushing the release. Many of the people whose
Speaker 10: personal information has been exposed are rightfully afraid about their
Speaker 10: identities being stolen and about threats to their personal safety,
Speaker 10: and people identified in the documents are already being forced
Speaker 10: to get new social Security numbers at a time.
Speaker 2: We go on and on and on, And that's because
Speaker 2: they had a guy there who was an expert on like,
Speaker 2: you know, being responsible and declassifying things and protecting people,
Speaker 2: and I get it. But the reason why it was
Speaker 2: done sloppily is because people don't know what they're doing,
Speaker 2: and they were ordering people to stop work or not
Speaker 2: to do work, and not pushing forward with things and
Speaker 2: doing them in the right way in the first place. Again,
Speaker 2: this stuff could have all been prepared, ready settled, and
Speaker 2: almost all of it released. Let's see now eight years
Speaker 2: ago for Christ's sake, I mean twenty seventeen, a November
Speaker 2: of twenty seventeen. This stuff was supposed to drop. We
Speaker 2: waited twenty five years for a bunch of this stuff,
Speaker 2: and they couldn't redact this that the third thing in
Speaker 2: order to protect somebody's Social Security number of people's names
Speaker 2: Da da da da dah, because they rushed it and
Speaker 2: it was sloppy. Look, if you're gonna point a blame
Speaker 2: at the Trump administration, fine, but get your your facts straight.
Speaker 2: This isn't because of the recent actors. They just decided
Speaker 2: to dump these things out there. No, it was because
Speaker 2: of the idiocy that went on before. And oh, by
Speaker 2: the way, four years of that idiocy was under your
Speaker 2: sleepwalking guy so ineptitude or the guy who's too senile
Speaker 2: to know where he put his shoes. Does it matter
Speaker 2: when you're gonna do stuff sloppily? And oh, the Congress
Speaker 2: has no accountability here regarding any of this. They know
Speaker 2: nothing of what they speak, and yet they speak loud
Speaker 2: and they're allowed to quote represent and quote us supposedly.
Speaker 2: Does any of this represent you? Are you all that concerned?
Speaker 2: Do you just say, hey, what the hell? Just get
Speaker 2: these people in new Social Security number and shut up?
Speaker 2: I do. I don't think it endangered anybody. I mean,
Speaker 2: maybe some ninety year old guys are a little worried
Speaker 2: because now they're known on the Internet and they never
Speaker 2: were before because they couldn't figure out the Facebook prior.
Speaker 10: When President Trump is literally dismantling the agency that administers them.
Speaker 10: Mister Davison, president Trump ordered the classification and release of
Speaker 10: tens of thousands of pages within twenty four hours. Do
Speaker 10: you think that that was problematic? And if so, why?
Speaker 2: Thank you for the question. It was.
Speaker 11: Going back to January, of course, was the executive order
Speaker 11: requiring the disclosure of all the records in the collection.
Speaker 2: Okay, Davison, here is that document expert I was just
Speaker 2: talking about, going back to January. Is the disclosure of
Speaker 2: the Yeah, that's the executive order. But again, there's a
Speaker 2: whole bunch of crap that happened here that A the
Speaker 2: Trump administration is not responsible for. And B, this is
Speaker 2: actually Trump trying to kick people in the ass and
Speaker 2: say get going and get this done already. I'm tired
Speaker 2: of hearing about it. That's the truth of it. And
Speaker 2: in this way, I'm not a Trump pumper in any way,
Speaker 2: shape or form, But dude, point the blame in the
Speaker 2: right direction, and I get this guy's whole existence is
Speaker 2: based on protecting people when documents are being released and
Speaker 2: all that. And no, I don't want everybody's documents out there.
Speaker 2: I'm pissed off about the dose situation in Musk. But again,
Speaker 2: this is not the hearing to do this with. This
Speaker 2: is the task force, okay, for declassification of federal secrets,
Speaker 2: the JFK files in particular, And you know what, if
Speaker 2: their efforts are to be taken seriously, they might want
Speaker 2: to at least focus on the damn task at hand.
Speaker 11: My understanding is that the process was playing out that
Speaker 11: the Archives was conducting the review it needed to determine
Speaker 11: what few bits of these records needed to be reducted
Speaker 11: to protect, among other things, the privacy of individuals whose
Speaker 11: information was contained there, and then that process was short circuited,
Speaker 11: and despite awareness at the nationalsk Care accounts on the
Speaker 11: Archives that the disclosure of these records would cause tangible
Speaker 11: privacy harm, the rollout was conducted without redactions all the same,
Speaker 11: leading to the situation where you know, hundreds of Social
Speaker 11: Security numbers have been disclosed, creating a quite scary, an
Speaker 11: alarming situation for those whose numbers were implicated, who now
Speaker 11: have to rush to place freezes on their credit accounts
Speaker 11: to if they're issued new Social Security numbers, to update
Speaker 11: all of that information with all of this their various
Speaker 11: accounts and creditors and so forth. So that it is,
Speaker 11: it is a serious issue for the people affected, and
Speaker 11: it could have been avoided with just a little bit
Speaker 11: more due diligence of the sort that the Archives normally exercises.
Speaker 2: Yes, so is there. It could have been avoided with
Speaker 2: a quarter century more due diligence in adhering to the
Speaker 2: JFK Records Collection Act and actually getting the job done
Speaker 2: instead of screwing around and trying to delay and obfuscate
Speaker 2: and everything else. I don't want to hear any more
Speaker 2: from miss Lee. We did get to hear from mister
Speaker 2: Morley next regarding what the Mary Farrell Foundation, which he
Speaker 2: is the vice chair of, is going to do in
Speaker 2: response to this, because they are going to again publish
Speaker 2: and put in their database the new documents, right, so
Speaker 2: what are they going to do about it?
Speaker 12: Say that the release of the social security numbers and
Speaker 12: other personal information was unprofessional, reckless, careless. I'm the vice
Speaker 12: president of the Mary Farrell Foundation, which vice president.
Speaker 2: My mistake, I said vice chair. But he's the vice
Speaker 2: president of the Mary Farrell Foundation, Okay, Sorry.
Speaker 12: Sponsors the largest online archive of JFK, RFK and MLK records.
Speaker 12: And I was authorized by the President to release this
Speaker 12: statement about the social security numbers. While the MFF is
Speaker 12: an advocate of full transparency and the JFK Records Act
Speaker 12: make no exception for such information, we are electing to
Speaker 12: redact all the social security numbers in these records, even
Speaker 12: unlike even seemingly mundane document details which sometimes do add
Speaker 12: to the history of the case. Social security numbers add
Speaker 12: nothing of value and expose their holders to possible identity theft. Accordingly,
Speaker 12: when we put these particular documents online in the coming weeks,
Speaker 12: we will be adding our own redactions to them. We
Speaker 12: will not be redacting other information. Most other data is
Speaker 12: long certain.
Speaker 10: Thank you so much for adding that. Yeah, I just
Speaker 10: want to be clear. Then, open and transparent federal government
Speaker 10: is essential for public trust, and the classification is a
Speaker 10: good thing. There is a way to do this. It
Speaker 10: is important that we are not how about unfortunately the
Speaker 10: rollout of things.
Speaker 2: Enough batt of lie already because it's just it's ridiculous. Okay, please,
Speaker 2: she's trying to make a point here. It's political grand
Speaker 2: standing and scoring points and that's it again, taking the
Speaker 2: focus away. Morley needed to respond and say, look, you
Speaker 2: know what, Mary Fowl Foundation is going to be more
Speaker 2: responsible with this then the government has been. And you
Speaker 2: know what, just point the stick at the government here
Speaker 2: we go. Is this the bureaucrats or is this Trump's
Speaker 2: fat I say, it's the sloppiness, laziness and matter of
Speaker 2: fact attempt to completely claw back anything that could be
Speaker 2: transparency away from the American people as a constant, and
Speaker 2: that cannot be ascribed to Donald Trump. Anyway. Here's my
Speaker 2: favorite highlight where we learn once again that these people
Speaker 2: sitting in the chambers of power in America don't understand
Speaker 2: how their predecessors operated, the chambers of power in which
Speaker 2: they sit, the power with which they wield. They don't
Speaker 2: understand any of that because they're just there to raise
Speaker 2: funds mostly and score points so they can keep raising funds.
Speaker 2: And here is a shot I've taken plenty of the
Speaker 2: left now with their idiocy regarding this. Let's take a
Speaker 2: look at what the right has to offer as far
Speaker 2: as people being well well read on the subject informed
Speaker 2: even though they were chosen to sit on this committee.
Speaker 2: So my stupid, foolish, probably almost insane assumption is that
Speaker 2: these would be the best qualified people to sit on
Speaker 2: this committee. I actually can literally hear you laughing, even
Speaker 2: though I know you're listening to this on a podcast.
Speaker 2: But let's hear from my favorite highlight of the day.
Speaker 13: Thank you, Madam Chair, Thank you to our witnesses for
Speaker 13: being here today.
Speaker 1: Hopefully we can stay on topic.
Speaker 13: For the rest of this hearing, we'd seem to be
Speaker 13: wrapping up pretty close here, mister Stone.
Speaker 2: Okay, so we're wrapping up pretty close. And first you
Speaker 2: wanted to make the point that nobody's staying on topic.
Speaker 2: And by the way, this is uh Lauren Bobert, right,
Speaker 2: just keep that in mind. You know, the one who
Speaker 2: likes to go to the theater with a gentleman, who
Speaker 2: likes to shoot things in her campaign videos famously and
Speaker 2: does lots of posing with guns, and was walking around
Speaker 2: the Capitol with a gun and all that good stuff
Speaker 2: because she had to prove her Second Amendment rights. I
Speaker 2: think she might be Dana Lauscha's cousin or something. I mean,
Speaker 2: they look alike. I'm making that up, guys. Anyway, let's
Speaker 2: go to Lauren Bobert and see how she expertly interrogates
Speaker 2: the situation and does something so productive.
Speaker 13: You wrote a book accusing LBJ of being involved in
Speaker 13: the killing of President Kennedy. Did these most recent releases
Speaker 13: confirm or negate your initial charge?
Speaker 2: Okay, she asked Oliver Stone. Mister Stone, Yeah, you wrote
Speaker 2: a book saying that LBJ was responsible for the murder.
Speaker 2: Do these documents back you up or do they negate
Speaker 2: that now she had a clever gotshu singer ear in mind,
Speaker 2: and it was probably to say, well, Sarah, I happen
Speaker 2: to know that nowhere in the documentation does it say
Speaker 2: anything about LBJ killing Kennedy. That was probably the attempt
Speaker 2: at the gotcha. But anybody who's well read on this subject,
Speaker 2: or even remotely well read, might know what the problem
Speaker 2: is immediately, just in the visual They turned to Oliver Stone, which,
Speaker 2: by the way, somebody at c SPAN was like drawing
Speaker 2: the camera in closer to Bobert as she was speaking,
Speaker 2: very very interesting choice of direction. But they turned to Stone,
Speaker 2: and Stone has a look on his face like did
Speaker 2: I just not hear her?
Speaker 7: Right?
Speaker 2: He turns to Morley, He turns to Di Eugenio, the
Speaker 2: two guys he knows pretty well, Like, guys, you gotta
Speaker 2: help me out. I confused. Anyway, let's listen to how
Speaker 2: it plays out.
Speaker 1: Being involved in the assassination.
Speaker 14: Anyway.
Speaker 2: He leans over now and Morley is explaining the question
Speaker 2: to him, which I think Ali might have a problem hearing.
Speaker 2: Oliver Stone might have a problem hearing a little bit.
Speaker 2: And I saw that earlier in the hearings where somebody
Speaker 2: had to explain it to him. He also had a
Speaker 2: little problem keeping his place when he was reading. The
Speaker 2: guy's getting old man. You know, he used to be
Speaker 2: one of the most intellectually sharp guys in the world foresuore.
Speaker 2: But even when he did that, you know, real history
Speaker 2: of the United States, you know, super long documentary, maybe
Speaker 2: a decade ago. You could already hear even in his voiceovers,
Speaker 2: he was starting to slip a little. And I look,
Speaker 2: time catches up with all of us. But still, Oliver
Speaker 2: Stone's work is valuable. They were kind enough to instead
Speaker 2: of just treating him like a kooky conspiracy theorist this time,
Speaker 2: which they usually did the other couple of times he's
Speaker 2: actually testified to Congress or sat down with them and
Speaker 2: given them his time and spoken with them. Before they
Speaker 2: usually treated him like so conspiracy kook Oliver Stone, How
Speaker 2: is it making a movie? I mean, is it kind
Speaker 2: of like making a cartoon when you're making up history
Speaker 2: as you go? Anyway, JFK Records act happened partially driven
Speaker 2: by the outrage caused by his artistic piece of work.
Speaker 2: But anyway, he's turning to Morley right now in this hearing,
Speaker 2: and he'll turn to de Eugenio, and this happened a
Speaker 2: couple of times. Did I not hear right? Can you?
Speaker 2: Can you explain this to me clarify. He's turning away
Speaker 2: from his mic Morley is trying desperately to calmly fill
Speaker 2: Oliverstone in on what's happening here. Di Eugenio has got
Speaker 2: an interesting look on his face. You guys should see
Speaker 2: the video yourselves to get it. But anyway, let's continue on.
Speaker 1: With audio of President Kennedy.
Speaker 6: No, no, I didn't in the film that you look closely,
Speaker 6: there's no such statements.
Speaker 2: Okay, now, now he's got no microphone on there, but
Speaker 2: I can hear him say, no, I didn't, And if
Speaker 2: you look at the film closely, because he thinks she's
Speaker 2: talking about his film through the looking glass, if you
Speaker 2: look at the film carefully, that's not what I said.
Speaker 2: That that that's incorrect. But he forgot to press the
Speaker 2: button to put his microphone on, which happened a couple
Speaker 2: of times to some of the witnesses here and by
Speaker 2: the way, to some of the congress people during the
Speaker 2: course of these hearings.
Speaker 6: No, no, I didn't. If you look closely at the film,
Speaker 6: that there's no, it accuses the president Johnson. Okay, part
Speaker 6: being part of a complicit and a cover up of
Speaker 6: the case.
Speaker 2: Now she gets ready, I guess you did. She's about
Speaker 2: ready to jump on him and be like, yeah, you're lying.
Speaker 2: Now are you lying before Congress?
Speaker 7: There?
Speaker 2: I mean, I'm only imagining where it could go, because
Speaker 2: here's where it actually went.
Speaker 6: But not in the assassination itself, which I don't know.
Speaker 1: What do you think that he was complicit with? Yes, sir,
Speaker 1: I'll get to you.
Speaker 14: The cover up.
Speaker 6: Well, how about for starters appointing Alan Dalles.
Speaker 2: Okay, he was complicit with the cover up. He's Oliver
Speaker 2: Stone's trying to say. She is now waving away, okay,
Speaker 2: Jefferson Morley, who's trying to jump in to put a
Speaker 2: stop to this, really to save her from looking stupid,
Speaker 2: And she's like, no, I'll get to you in a minute,
Speaker 2: and she's waving a pencil at him. I like, no, no, no,
Speaker 2: you don't speak out of turn. Here in fifth grade,
Speaker 2: we don't speak out of turn. You need to adhere
Speaker 2: to the teacher. I am the center of attention. This
Speaker 2: is many teachers in white schools used to say to me,
Speaker 2: this is a benevolent dictatorship. And that's what Bobert's trying
Speaker 2: to say here to Jeff Morley. But anyway, Jeff was
Speaker 2: trying to save her from going on and on about
Speaker 2: something stupid. And let's see if he does eventually.
Speaker 6: The head of the CIA, it was fired by Kennedy,
Speaker 6: to the commission itself, to the Warren Commission, and he
Speaker 6: goes to almost every meeting and he's pretty much in
Speaker 6: charge of the Warren Commission from the beginning.
Speaker 2: Alan, you know my point about it should have just
Speaker 2: been called the Dullest Commission. There you go. Anyway, continuing on,
Speaker 2: Stone is trying to respond to this weird accusation about
Speaker 2: his previous statements that he never made.
Speaker 6: And dulles that's part of the evidence that points to
Speaker 6: President Johnson's either in confidence or involvement.
Speaker 13: Mister Morley, I think you had something to add on that.
Speaker 12: I think you're confusing mister Oliver staring with mister Roger Stone.
Speaker 2: Yet Sorry it's rod. No, you didn't misstate it, Miss Bobert.
Speaker 2: You were ill informed and you completely ascribed the wrong
Speaker 2: thing to the wrong person. You didn't like make a
Speaker 2: slight slip in your statement. You were ill informed, and
Speaker 2: you tried to go with a script and you attempted
Speaker 2: to pull a gotcha. Let's see how well that goes
Speaker 2: for her, because I think she had a couple of
Speaker 2: them maybe in the chamber, and she didn't quite hit.
Speaker 12: The mark Stone who implicated LBJA and the assassinators of
Speaker 12: the President.
Speaker 1: It's not my friend that were there.
Speaker 13: I may have misinterpreted that, and I apologize for that.
Speaker 2: I misinterpreted. She's using all kinds of words. No, you
Speaker 2: didn't misinterpret You didn't, you know, misspeak slightly because you
Speaker 2: know you knew what you meant, but you got your
Speaker 2: phrase wrong. You were attempting to do a gotcha on
Speaker 2: Oliver Stone, and what you messed up is Oliver Stone
Speaker 2: and Rogerstone are two different people. And in fact, you
Speaker 2: really should have talked to Rogerstone directly because you probably could,
Speaker 2: being that you're a Republican, being that you are a
Speaker 2: Trump type person and all that, because guess what, roger
Speaker 2: Stone was part of Trump's apparatus, and I'm certain they're
Speaker 2: still buddies. I mean, you know, beyond even him getting
Speaker 2: him the pardon for the whole intimidation of a witness
Speaker 2: deal Bobert here try to gotcha and got caught. And
Speaker 2: I think she tries the second one here, but maybe
Speaker 2: you'll disagree with me. Listening, let's see, but there.
Speaker 13: Seems to be some eluding of, like you said, incompetence.
Speaker 1: Or some sort of involvement there on the back end.
Speaker 2: Okay, involvement on the back end, eluding of some incompetence
Speaker 2: you're trying to allude to. Yeah, there's a suggestion that
Speaker 2: Lbj's involved somehow. You have now realized you have no
Speaker 2: idea what the hell it is. But Stone just told
Speaker 2: you if you listen, that it's either complicity in the
Speaker 2: cover up or in competence because he wasn't ill informed
Speaker 2: about what was happening, and he was in touch with
Speaker 2: Jaegar Hoover constantly. And he's the guy. It is the
Speaker 2: President's Commission on the Assassination of John F. Kennedy, not
Speaker 2: the Warrant Commission. He's the guy who allegedly came up
Speaker 2: with assembled the commission, chose the people, jawboned Warren Earl Warren,
Speaker 2: the Chief Judge to the Supreme Court, into doing it,
Speaker 2: and others with the whole we might have to go
Speaker 2: to nuclear war. If you guys can't wrap this up
Speaker 2: the right way deal and Bobert is so ill informed
Speaker 2: on this she is why is she on this committee?
Speaker 2: My question? Sorry I shouldn't have asked. Let's go back
Speaker 2: to listening to the rest of my favorite part.
Speaker 13: Here, and so not a sorry, I'm gonna move on,
Speaker 13: mister Morley.
Speaker 2: Sorry, I'm gonna move on because I messed it all
Speaker 2: up so much and now I don't even know how
Speaker 2: to properly backpedal out of this. And there's a reason
Speaker 2: why I'm picking on Bobert, and I'll get to it
Speaker 2: in a minute.
Speaker 13: I would like to talk more about the C three
Speaker 13: nine nine and.
Speaker 1: This file.
Speaker 13: I want the American people to know what's in there,
Speaker 13: that what was recently released, how that lines up to this, and.
Speaker 1: How we could get more clarity there.
Speaker 2: Okay, Now she is appropriated. Piece is portions, fragments indeed
Speaker 2: of things that have been mentioned. CE three nine nine
Speaker 2: is Commission Exhibit three nine nine, which is a bullet,
Speaker 2: not a file. It's a bullet. Okay, How does it lie?
Speaker 2: How does this work into the case. Can you explain
Speaker 2: to me some of these things you mentioned that I
Speaker 2: really wasn't paying attention to, and have no previous knowledge of,
Speaker 2: and have no knowledge at all whatsoever on. Could you
Speaker 2: just explain some of those things that you mentioned before
Speaker 2: that sound like they're particular to this case. Could you
Speaker 2: explain them to me real fast in the two minutes
Speaker 2: I have left of time now, because I use three
Speaker 2: minutes on trying to do a gotcha on mister Stone,
Speaker 2: and I had the wrong mister Stone, Can I add
Speaker 2: the other? Can I now move on to another gotcha
Speaker 2: with some of these fragments and try to still seem
Speaker 2: like I know what I'm talking about. I'm sorry, that's
Speaker 2: the Bobert to o'celly translation.
Speaker 12: I'm not familiar with the number that you.
Speaker 8: Mentioned, mister d Are you talking about commission exhibit three
Speaker 8: nine nine?
Speaker 12: Yeah, okay, I yield my.
Speaker 14: Time with Jim.
Speaker 2: I yield my time to Jim. Commission exhibit three nine nine.
Speaker 2: Morley knows what that is. But she said a file.
Speaker 2: See That's why I was confusing. And Morley's like file
Speaker 2: three nine nine. I don't know because he probably didn't
Speaker 2: hear the CE part, and if he did, he might say, well,
Speaker 2: you mean the file or do you mean the bullet? Anyway,
Speaker 2: do you Genio jumps forward, Hey, you mean the bullet? Anyway?
Speaker 1: Moving forward, I have more questions for you too.
Speaker 8: The commission Exhibit three has a very wild trajectory, which
Speaker 8: I think any person familiar with ballistics, you know, would question.
Speaker 8: In the first place, then the second place is it
Speaker 8: has a very very dubious chain of custody all right
Speaker 8: from it was first captured at the Parkland Hospital. Tomlinson
Speaker 8: and Wright, who worked there, turned it over to feacon servant.
Speaker 2: Okay, there's more to this, obviously, and I don't want
Speaker 2: to be labored Diugenio's discussion too much longer. I think
Speaker 2: the next gotcha piece actually is directed at Morley. After
Speaker 2: di Eugenio kind of reads her in on a bunch
Speaker 2: of stuff, and I think she overran her time.
Speaker 8: Way and he said, are you sure that's the bullet?
Speaker 2: I said that, they said, I turned over and he
Speaker 2: said yes, and he just shook his head.
Speaker 8: You know, I can't, but he couldn't believe it.
Speaker 2: Eugenio likes to tell stories and accent you know, people's
Speaker 2: reactions and discussions, and it's a very effective way of
Speaker 2: presenting things. But he's now giving Bobert some of what
Speaker 2: she should have done her homework on knowing that she
Speaker 2: was going to be part of the task force there
Speaker 2: in Congress. But you know, what do I know about
Speaker 2: work ethics or anything, or reading in on stuff or
Speaker 2: actually gaining knowledge before you start making sweeping stupid statements.
Speaker 6: I mean, thank you.
Speaker 13: I would love to go into that deeper. But mister Morley,
Speaker 13: before my time is up, why do you believe that
Speaker 13: the CIA was surveilling Lee Harvey Oswald in the years
Speaker 13: before JFK's assassination And what methods did the CIA use
Speaker 13: in the surveillance?
Speaker 2: Okay, So Bobert was not listening to Morley earlier because
Speaker 2: he mentioned HD lingual, he mentioned that that was the
Speaker 2: opening of mail. He mentioned all of this already, and
Speaker 2: you would think that might be a form of surveillance
Speaker 2: on Lee Harvey Oswald. Plus he has sitting in front
Speaker 2: of him a file. Okay, what proof do you have?
Speaker 2: Because I wasn't listening earlier in the hour, here is
Speaker 2: a file in front of him, a full print out
Speaker 2: of what he calls Lee Harvey Oswald's file, which was
Speaker 2: sitting on James Engleton's desk, you know, a week before
Speaker 2: or two weeks before the assassination, and why does he
Speaker 2: think that? And everything else? She is now attempting to
Speaker 2: do a gotcha here, what proof do you have of
Speaker 2: that surveillance? Okay. One of the.
Speaker 12: One of the documents that was released last month revealed
Speaker 12: that when Angleton put people on the on the list
Speaker 12: for intercepting their mail, his purpose was to approach them
Speaker 12: to be a contact or a source. So I believe
Speaker 12: that Angleton, when he put Oswald under male surveillance, was
Speaker 12: considering using him as a contact as a source. The
Speaker 12: millions of surveillance that were used were first male surveillance,
Speaker 12: and then Oswald came under a photographic surveillance, wiretap surveillance,
Speaker 12: and contact with CIA funded groups.
Speaker 1: Thank you, I'm a mountain chair, I yelled.
Speaker 9: I now recognize.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you better yield, because uh, Morley just had to
Speaker 2: re again go back over the bullet points he already
Speaker 2: co in his opening statement, if you were listening would
Speaker 2: have been nice. If she was listening, you know, I
Speaker 2: think she might have actually gotten right up and ran
Speaker 2: out of the room right afterwards for some reason. Because
Speaker 2: I'm looking at a wide shot now of the chamber
Speaker 2: and it's pretty interesting, and she turns it back over
Speaker 2: to the chair, and I think the next one up
Speaker 2: and it'll be the last police piece I play from
Speaker 2: this because I don't want to put you all to
Speaker 2: sleep so fast. Will be the lady there Crockett, who
Speaker 2: recently got herself in a bit of hot water for
Speaker 2: calling Governor Abbott governor hot wheels in Texas. And she
Speaker 2: is the representative from Dallas, which is probably the logic
Speaker 2: behind why she's sitting on this committee. And she makes
Speaker 2: a statement about Dallas. I know I'm going to try
Speaker 2: and skip over it, you know, pretty much, saying, look,
Speaker 2: we now know that there were elements of this, that
Speaker 2: and the third thing involved in this, but Dallas has
Speaker 2: ever forever been stained by the assassination and that is
Speaker 2: one of those things that's very real to people in Dallas.
Speaker 2: And you know, therefore cool. But let's see if she
Speaker 2: tries to grant stand and waste time as a Democrat
Speaker 2: now on the committee here as they're running out of time,
Speaker 2: by the way, and only giving five minutes supposedly for responses,
Speaker 2: you know, from each witness, granting each of the questioners
Speaker 2: five minutes with which to navigate through this stuff, and
Speaker 2: when they're poorly informed. It's going to take more than
Speaker 2: five minutes to get them up to speed on anything.
Speaker 2: I think maybe it's just my.
Speaker 1: Opinion as Miss Crockett for five minutes.
Speaker 2: First of all, shout out to Governor hot Wheels. No,
Speaker 2: I'm kidding, hold on, thank you so much.
Speaker 15: There often isn't too much agreement when it comes specifically
Speaker 15: to Congress, let alone to this particular committee. And I
Speaker 15: will tell you that y'all have given me all the
Speaker 15: feels as someone who had an opportunity to practice law.
Speaker 15: So when you start talking about things such as chain
Speaker 15: of custody, these are the things that I used to
Speaker 15: challenge all the time as a defense attorney.
Speaker 2: He engaged in the debate. So we're giving her all
Speaker 2: the feels and all that and on and on. Now
Speaker 2: it's because she's a Democrat, and because she's the type
Speaker 2: of woman that called Governor Abbott, Governor Hoigh Wheels. I'm
Speaker 2: thinking she might not be all that interested in making
Speaker 2: a serious statement outside of you know, thank god, nobody
Speaker 2: is saying that in the evidence, Dallas, Texas or the
Speaker 2: people of Dallas were responsible for murdering the president. She's
Speaker 2: happy about that. I think Mss Crockett is. But also
Speaker 2: what's fascinating is in the shot where she's reading off
Speaker 2: of her notes, the lady sitting next to her has
Speaker 2: the most like somebody farted looking face for somebody sitting
Speaker 2: in Congress. I've seen it quite a while. Anyway, let's
Speaker 2: get back to mister Morley and what he had to
Speaker 2: say after this long sort of thing. Again, she's got
Speaker 2: five minutes to work with the question them and everything,
Speaker 2: and she goes through this whole political statement. I'm skipping
Speaker 2: because it's just redundant report.
Speaker 15: On the JFK assassination. If the CIA and FBI deleted
Speaker 15: all documents like the Trump administration officials planned to do
Speaker 15: in the Signal group chat.
Speaker 2: See, I'm sorry, that's the Kapper on her you know statement.
Speaker 2: Oh and Trump's going to get rid of the signal
Speaker 2: documents because you know, and again they're supposed to keep
Speaker 2: them in all that. But this is not the committee
Speaker 2: on the signal documentation. This is the JFK Task Force.
Speaker 2: And nobody else is frustrated this right, I'm an idiot. Well, okay,
Speaker 2: mister Morley, after my long statement where I've used up
Speaker 2: almost all of my time and yours do you give
Speaker 2: me a quick, concise answer to this particular piece of
Speaker 2: political grand standing for the current events that are happening
Speaker 2: right now, as opposed to talking to me about JFK stuff.
Speaker 2: Did you do that, mister Morley.
Speaker 12: The CIA destroyed a lot of records related to President
Speaker 12: Kennedy's assassination. Again, I didn't come here to engage in
Speaker 12: the debate about partisan politics. I think everybody agrees about
Speaker 12: the JFK files, and I want to endorse mister Davison's
Speaker 12: call for full funding of public records offices in the government.
Speaker 2: I am okay. So the idea that Davison brings up
Speaker 2: that cutting of the funding of the records offices and
Speaker 2: NARRA and stuff like that will get you sloppier results. True,
Speaker 2: Morley rightly so steps forward and says, regardless of my
Speaker 2: political orientation, let's call it. I didn't think I was
Speaker 2: here to talk about that politely, concisely, in a rather
Speaker 2: salient fashion, Morley reminds her. I understand, she said in response,
Speaker 2: But does she understand?
Speaker 15: And mister Stone, wouldn't it be nearly impossible to produce
Speaker 15: a film if there was not a legitimate record of
Speaker 15: these events taking place.
Speaker 2: In other words, according to Democrat Crockett, there's already a
Speaker 2: good record of this stuff. You wouldn't have been able
Speaker 2: to make a film otherwise, all right there, Uh, filmmakers
Speaker 2: sly in the family. Stone it was not over time.
Speaker 6: Well, that's a very buck question. Not really.
Speaker 2: No, I'm sorry Oliver Stone forgot to hit his button.
Speaker 2: But I almost waited for her to say, yes. Uh,
Speaker 2: come on there, filmmaker, Oliver Stone, pony, let's ride, let's
Speaker 2: talk about it. You meet Governor, hot wheels, we all
Speaker 2: go out for some hot wings. Because you're giving me
Speaker 2: the feels because I was a lawyer.
Speaker 6: That's a very good question. Not really. I mean, the
Speaker 6: events unfolded as they did, and right away from day one,
Speaker 6: people were pointing out inconsistencies, way before there was an
Speaker 6: official official record of this.
Speaker 1: Thank you with that, I will yield.
Speaker 2: Yeah, there were inconsistencies and nonsense being pushed before there
Speaker 2: was an official record, Miss Crockett. But you know, you
Speaker 2: might want to read in on what's going on here
Speaker 2: since you're sitting on this committee, and it should be
Speaker 2: important to you since you represent Dallas. Just saying, damn,
Speaker 2: I knew I had to swing at both sides, and
Speaker 2: I forgot how bad Crockett was. Who's worse the attempted
Speaker 2: gotcha from Bobart or the need to jump on Trump
Speaker 2: and the signal chat during this because all of this
Speaker 2: stuff is so relevant to get something accomplished here, isn't it.
Speaker 14: Oh?
Speaker 2: And now the chairperson of the committee forgot to hit
Speaker 2: her Mike Representative Luna. See it happens. They're good and
Speaker 2: bad mics on both sides. Mister Morley, mister Stone, mister D. G. D. Eugenio.
Speaker 16: I just want to say thank you for being here,
Speaker 16: taking time out of your day, and I want to
Speaker 16: apologize that not everyone on this hearing seems to want
Speaker 16: to use this time to its fullest extent, And so
Speaker 16: I want to start by saying thank you, mister Stone.
Speaker 16: Shortly after your film's release, the United States Congress passed
Speaker 16: the JFK Assassination Records Collection Act of nineteen ninety two,
Speaker 16: and you did something that I don't know that I've
Speaker 16: done in my career.
Speaker 2: It passed unanimously. I want to give you an up. Okay,
Speaker 2: So mister Burleson here at which I do believe is
Speaker 2: a Republican, I think he comes up with some expositional
Speaker 2: to do stuff and then paid him that bit of
Speaker 2: respect I talked about earlier, just done directly personally to.
Speaker 16: Talk about how it felt and the impact of having
Speaker 16: a movie that not only has spurred multiple hearings of Congress,
Speaker 16: but unanimously passed a bill through Congress.
Speaker 6: Sir I was at the time. I was. I was
Speaker 6: just told that by many people who were involved, and
Speaker 6: they were very happy and thought that this was a
Speaker 6: great public duty. I didn't feel that way. I felt
Speaker 6: like I was being skewed the whole time in the media,
Speaker 6: and many people have volunteered, important people volunteered negative impressions
Speaker 6: that were not based. I don't think on reality that
Speaker 6: the people didn't bother to see the film. For example,
Speaker 6: and we're saying that he's got Lyndon Johnson and all
Speaker 6: that involved in blah blah blah, and he's got fifty
Speaker 6: five people, eight different agencies involved. I mean, this is nonsense.
Speaker 16: I just want to say, on behalf of the American people,
Speaker 16: thank you for what you did, because because of your work,
Speaker 16: we now have documents like this one. Matta Char'd like
Speaker 16: to enter into the record a CIA document that ends
Speaker 16: in number one zero zero five to.
Speaker 2: Six with that objection so ordered.
Speaker 16: In this document, it describes that the I mean it
Speaker 16: dispels the narrative that when Oswald visited Mexico City that
Speaker 16: he only met with Sylvia Duran. In fact, in this
Speaker 16: document he met with a KGB official.
Speaker 2: Remarkably, the individual by the name.
Speaker 16: Of Costakoff was actually a member of KGB and Department thirteen.
Speaker 16: Because of your work, we now have this kind of evidence.
Speaker 16: He actually met with a member of the KGB who
Speaker 16: is part of the wetworks, the assassination team. I also
Speaker 16: want to say thank you because we because of your work,
Speaker 16: we have another document that I want to enter into
Speaker 16: the record.
Speaker 2: This this is.
Speaker 16: Ends in one zero nine. I'm sorry one zero one
Speaker 16: nine one, but that objection so ordered. In this document,
Speaker 16: we have a testimony that an individual named Francisco Tamayo,
Speaker 16: otherwise known as the El Mexicano, accompanied Lee Harvey Oswald
Speaker 16: into Mexico City for his meetings in both the Cuban
Speaker 16: Embassy and the Russian Embassy. Mister Stone, I just I'm
Speaker 16: shocked that this narrative has only really been something that
Speaker 16: we've seen only in the last few years.
Speaker 2: You would think that.
Speaker 16: The Warren report would have reported the fact that Oswald
Speaker 16: had met with a KGB individual in the Department thirteen
Speaker 16: of you know, basically the Assassination Division, and that he
Speaker 16: was accompanied by an individual known as El Mexicano. That later,
Speaker 16: an FBI report indicated that this individual, El Mexicano, was
Speaker 16: captured in Venezuela for attempting to assassinate another individual.
Speaker 2: Yeah, this guy, his heart's in the right place, but
Speaker 2: again he's another guy who's not well read on the subject. Right,
Speaker 2: moving through or just jump through a couple more pieces
Speaker 2: and then I swear I'll be done with it. Let's
Speaker 2: go on and see what else we can glean from. Again,
Speaker 2: this is the task force in Congress that's supposed to
Speaker 2: be focused on this declassification. What's going on with it?
Speaker 2: What can we do better going forward, et cetera. What
Speaker 2: can we do to fix this thing with? You know,
Speaker 2: so security numbers getting released and all that too.
Speaker 17: Right now, Just how dogged you guys have been on
Speaker 17: this for decades, which.
Speaker 2: By the way, a lot of that information that guy
Speaker 2: just mentioned. Of course, if you're somebody who has been
Speaker 2: into the literature for the past couple of decades. You
Speaker 2: might have been aware of this in the nineteen eighties,
Speaker 2: but you got a whole lot more proof of it
Speaker 2: through the Records Collection Act, and a lot of suppositions
Speaker 2: were actually proven correct or refined based on things released
Speaker 2: in the nineties and ever after.
Speaker 17: Mister Morley, I want to start with you, what is
Speaker 17: the most interesting information you found in this newest release
Speaker 17: of documents on the assassination of President Kennedy?
Speaker 2: Is Representative Crane asking this question.
Speaker 12: The nine memos about James Angleton that were fully declassified
Speaker 12: on March eighteenth is the most important collection that I've
Speaker 12: seen so far. There is a lot of information that
Speaker 12: has come out. Jim mentioned the Arthur s Lessenger memo
Speaker 12: that really sets the stage for the alienation between the
Speaker 12: Kennedy White House and the CIA that lasted for the
Speaker 12: rest of Kennedy's presidency. So I would say that the
Speaker 12: Angleton memos and the Slessenger memo are the most important
Speaker 12: things I've seen so far.
Speaker 2: Thank you, mister Morley.
Speaker 17: Do you believe that Oswald was recruited and being handled
Speaker 17: as a source for the CIA?
Speaker 12: I believe Oswa was an agent of influence who was
Speaker 12: manipulated by the CIA.
Speaker 17: Okay, And as I was going through some research, one
Speaker 17: of the things that I found interesting, and please correct
Speaker 17: me if I'm mistaken here any of you guys on
Speaker 17: the panel, But mister Underhill, who was a CIA agent himself,
Speaker 17: who apparently left DC the days after the assassination in
Speaker 17: a hurry. Gary Underhill then confided in a friend that
Speaker 17: a click within the CIA had assassinated Kennedy. He also
Speaker 17: told his friends that he may need to leave the
Speaker 17: country and that he feared for his life. Mister Underhill
Speaker 17: was then found dead six months later. I'm gonna start
Speaker 17: with you, mister Morley. Do you find those types of
Speaker 17: stories surrounding mister Underhill to be credible.
Speaker 12: Mister Underhill was hardly alone in suspecting CIA involvement of
Speaker 12: the assassination. President Harry Truman suspected it, President Johnson suspected it,
Speaker 12: and President Richard Nixon suspected it.
Speaker 2: So I think that.
Speaker 12: Gary Underhill was a man who worked in the intelligence
Speaker 12: community and was in a position to know something. His
Speaker 12: story is not confirmed, but it's consistent with what lots
Speaker 12: of other people thought.
Speaker 2: Well, anyway, this guy the complete polar opposite to Bobert
Speaker 2: somebody who actually did a little research, took a little
Speaker 2: time to figure some things out. Got to give credit
Speaker 2: to Crane there, don't you, miss Luna.
Speaker 18: Thank you, Chairwoman Luna. According to Pew Research, trusts in
Speaker 18: the federal government is plummeted from seventy four percent in
Speaker 18: nineteen fifty eight to twenty two percent in twenty twenty five.
Speaker 2: Is mister gil and now we're going to see where
Speaker 2: he goes with this.
Speaker 18: That's a trajectory that is utterly unsustainable in the long term,
Speaker 18: incompatible with democratic self governance. Unfortunately, a lot of that
Speaker 18: decline and trust is justified the JFK assassination attempt. Excuse me,
Speaker 18: the JFK assassination happened over sixty years ago, and we
Speaker 18: still don't have all of the facts about what happened
Speaker 18: that day. Mister Morley, thank you for being here, and
Speaker 18: thank you for all of your work that you've done
Speaker 18: on this. Do you believe that the CIA is in
Speaker 18: compliance with President Trump's executive order to declassify and release
Speaker 18: the JFK files.
Speaker 2: Now, if Morley said anything other than no, they are
Speaker 2: not in compliance, I would have lost it. But if
Speaker 2: memory serves, he gives the right answer here.
Speaker 12: No, they are important records that have not been provided,
Speaker 12: like the personnel file of George Joannidi's. I should also
Speaker 12: note that as we go through these records, there are
Speaker 12: still redactions in some of these records, and not a
Speaker 12: huge amount, but we have not had full compliance either
Speaker 12: in producing all the records or in redacted or completely
Speaker 12: releasing all the records that were redacted.
Speaker 18: And for the record, how many of the JFK files
Speaker 18: this has the CIA released the executive order was issued.
Speaker 12: The figure of eighty thousand pages is accurate as far
Speaker 12: as we can tell, and that's information from several thousand documents.
Speaker 18: Are those from the CIA.
Speaker 12: Specifically, most of the records that were released last month,
Speaker 12: about eighty percent of them were from the CIA.
Speaker 18: Okay, And how many documents do you believe the CIA
Speaker 18: still has that either haven't been released or overly redacted.
Speaker 12: Since we haven't seen them, it's hard to put a
Speaker 12: number on it, but I would put the number in
Speaker 12: the hundreds, hundreds of documents.
Speaker 18: Hundreds Okay.
Speaker 2: Now I disagree with Morley there partially. Can we know
Speaker 2: with any certainty what that number is? No, we cannot.
Speaker 2: We cannot because we don't know all of what they've withheld.
Speaker 2: It's not possible to know at all. However, to state
Speaker 2: that there's hundreds of documents left. Sorry, mister Morley, I
Speaker 2: think you are understating the sheer enormity of the issue here. Okay,
Speaker 2: let's just check with a couple other little things before
Speaker 2: we're done here today with this piece anyway, and then
Speaker 2: we'll take a break.
Speaker 6: Wrote about it and was interviewed in our film in
Speaker 6: which he says that in addition to there were three
Speaker 6: women on the fourth floor who's during the time of
Speaker 6: the assassination, they witnessed it.
Speaker 9: From that, the Task Force send a letter requesting and
Speaker 9: we see make a copy, a clear copy.
Speaker 6: Of the eternally, that'd be very interesting. I mister Dean Genie,
Speaker 6: and I saw a film of the potential Oswald watching
Speaker 6: the motorcade go by, which means that he was downstairs
Speaker 6: at the time of the shooting, and that would be
Speaker 6: very interesting to see. We don't we couldn't say for
Speaker 6: sure that that was Oswalt, but it's a man who
Speaker 6: looks like him, So I think it would be a
Speaker 6: very good idea for the Task Force to subpoena NBC,
Speaker 6: which has the original film.
Speaker 8: Yes, they supposedly have the original.
Speaker 6: Yeah, they have the original film, they've refused it twice
Speaker 6: to be shown. Yes, and if this task Force could
Speaker 6: easily get that, and American public should should have a
Speaker 6: right to judge for himself who was standing there.
Speaker 7: Well.
Speaker 9: First of all, I would like to thank our witnesses
Speaker 9: for being here today. There are those in our country
Speaker 9: who may ask why this task force seeks to pursue
Speaker 9: the truth underlying the facts surrounding the assassination of President
Speaker 9: John F.
Speaker 1: Kennedy in nineteen sixty three.
Speaker 9: And the answer to that is the truth, even the
Speaker 9: truth delayed, and justice, even justice delayed, is always worth attaining.
Speaker 9: And the men and women who have sought answers regarding
Speaker 9: the assassination of the American President of American President John F.
Speaker 9: Kennedy for all the world to see, have been obstructed
Speaker 9: and hampered by our own government for over sixty years.
Speaker 9: This hearing is not meant to provide a definitive explanation
Speaker 9: of the Kennedy assassination.
Speaker 1: This hearing demonstrates, however, that.
Speaker 9: The CIA and other components of the federal government have
Speaker 9: not been honest with the American people that they are
Speaker 9: meant to serve up until recent efforts.
Speaker 2: Okay, so we'll leave it at that, because there's a
Speaker 2: more statement, more grandstanding, a few other things. But I
Speaker 2: thought those were very relevant highlights that you should hear
Speaker 2: and get an analysis about. By the way, that whole
Speaker 2: Kevin O'Leary thing where I was looking for, you know,
Speaker 2: him talking about the signal and the noise, I couldn't
Speaker 2: find that, but I did find this interesting clip where
Speaker 2: he has this weird habit on and I've seen him
Speaker 2: do it on TV many times. He's one of these
Speaker 2: touchy feely guys and he winds up touching one of
Speaker 2: the CNN anchors or CNN panelists whichever during a broadcast,
Speaker 2: and I thought it was kind of funny.
Speaker 1: Powers professional, you don't have to touch it is literally
Speaker 1: tweeted to these members, thank you for doing this. I
Speaker 1: don't want you to touch me.
Speaker 6: That's my pers'll ever do it.
Speaker 2: I just I just wanted to play that. I found
Speaker 2: that plenty s mercial base, and I don't want you
Speaker 2: in it.
Speaker 14: In denial again.
Speaker 19: Secret Wars with air strikes and tanks by Larry Handcock.
Speaker 19: Secret Wars became a staple of US covert operations and
Speaker 19: are still happening today.
Speaker 20: Larry Hancock's book In Denial rips the cover off many
Speaker 20: of them, using new files.
Speaker 21: It exposes things about the.
Speaker 22: Bay of Pigs that no one has ever written about before.
Speaker 22: It shows why it really failed and why the United
Speaker 22: States did not learn from it. It also shows why
Speaker 22: other countries today are doing secret operations with more success happening.
Speaker 22: This is the book that puts what some want to
Speaker 22: deny into the lights.
Speaker 20: In Denial secret wars with air strikes and tanks Larry
Speaker 20: Hancock for more information Larry hyphen and Handcock dot com.
Speaker 20: Pick up your copy of Inn Denial at Amazon dot
Speaker 20: com in digital.
Speaker 2: Or physical success and this is the book that puts
Speaker 2: get something.
Speaker 23: Secret wars larryman Cox for more information.
Speaker 20: Dot com Your copy Didn't Denial at Amazon dot com
Speaker 20: in digital bread.
Speaker 7: Shot you a fact.
Speaker 21: That yeah, the use expressed my caller, schools and anyone
Speaker 21: else who happens again on the air's only dot com.
Speaker 21: You're not necessarily the musical jelly chilling and we are.
Speaker 2: Not responsible for instability which might ensued the war.
Speaker 24: State by Michael Swanson explains the great national transformation that
Speaker 24: took place and put the Kennedy presidency in the context
Speaker 24: of the Times and reveals never before published information about
Speaker 24: the Cuban missile crisis. President Kennedy would not have been
Speaker 24: assassinated if he had been president two hundred years ago.
Speaker 24: His assassination took place in the context of the Cold
Speaker 24: War and the rise of the national security state. Before
Speaker 24: World War II, the United States was a continental republic.
Speaker 24: In the decade that followed, it became an imperial superpower.
Speaker 24: Generals such as Curtis LeMay not only wanted to invade Cuba,
Speaker 24: but knew that there were short range missiles on the
Speaker 24: island aren't with nuclear warheads that they could not destroy
Speaker 24: because they were on mobile launchers. Their invasion could have
Speaker 24: led to a Third World War, and they wanted to
Speaker 24: go to war anyway. The War State by Michael Swanson
Speaker 24: reveals why and will show you what President Kennedy was
Speaker 24: up against. For more information The Warstate dot com.
Speaker 14: Nuclear holocaust.
Speaker 6: You know what uranium is right? Thing called nuclear weapons
Speaker 6: and other things like lots of you know what uranium
Speaker 6: is right? Bad things things have done with uranium, including
Speaker 6: some bad.
Speaker 14: Things nuclear holocaust.
Speaker 4: You know what uranium is right?
Speaker 14: I've been doing Nuclear Holo.
Speaker 2: Dot com Radio can't. It's segment number two of the
Speaker 2: Effect here on a Wednesday, and it is a out
Speaker 2: the news. So let's get back to it so that
Speaker 2: we don't just stay in Jfkland. What's happening with your
Speaker 2: food prices and everything else? And believe me, I got
Speaker 2: a lot to say there. I mean, we could talk
Speaker 2: about specific numbers and dates. And everybody is talking about eggs, right,
Speaker 2: what is happening with your egg prices and everything else?
Speaker 2: And the tariffs are hitting. It is Liberation Day, et cetera,
Speaker 2: et cetera, all of that going on. And I'm going
Speaker 2: to drop some links in the live chatroom at Ochelli
Speaker 2: dot com. But don't worry. Check out the show notes
Speaker 2: and you'll get more than enough to read and figure
Speaker 2: out what it is that I utilized for references here
Speaker 2: as we move forward, and apparently I don't know, there's
Speaker 2: some issue with people not being able to sign into
Speaker 2: the chat room. My apologies for it, but hopefully you
Speaker 2: can follow what's happening. I'm having trouble dropping my links.
Speaker 2: Actually anyway, it is what it is. Okay, back to it.
Speaker 2: What is going on with food? Well, we could talk
Speaker 2: about eggs, we could talk about all that trouble. Let's
Speaker 2: talk about a place where people go to eat. The
Speaker 2: end of the restaurant, The end of Hooters from The Atlantic,
Speaker 2: I kid you not, okay, that's the name of the article,
Speaker 2: The end of Hooters, and again dropping it in a
Speaker 2: live chat room at O'Kelly dot com. Let's do it
Speaker 2: so from this article which was released, let's see it
Speaker 2: looks like March twenty nine, of twenty twenty five. For decades,
Speaker 2: you couldn't drive down a highway in America without seeing her,
Speaker 2: a tan blonde woman scantily clad in orange and white,
Speaker 2: laid across a billboard, her legs as long as the
Speaker 2: semitrucks zooming past her. Keep your eyes on the road,
Speaker 2: it might say, or come see me at Hooters. When
Speaker 2: I was twelve in Merphestboro, Tennessee, I went to Hooters
Speaker 2: for the first time. It was twenty ten, and the
Speaker 2: chain was only a few years away from its peak,
Speaker 2: when it would have more than four hundred and thirty
Speaker 2: locations around the world. It was the kind of place
Speaker 2: my mom refused to enter, but my friend's parents didn't
Speaker 2: seem to feel the same. Compunction. When the waitress came
Speaker 2: to take our order, I remember being surprised that my
Speaker 2: friend's dad knew her name. I stared down at my
Speaker 2: kids menu, feeling keenly that I should avoid eye contact
Speaker 2: with both the woman and the owl on her shirt.
Speaker 2: It was obvious to me, even as a kid, that
Speaker 2: this restaurant wasn't made for me. It was there to
Speaker 2: serve the appetites of America's men, and now its day
Speaker 2: may be ending. Hooters of America is about three hundred
Speaker 2: million dollars in debt, and this winter began prepping for
Speaker 2: a possible bankruptcy filing. In twenty twenty four, closed about
Speaker 2: forty locations in the US. Hooters isn't the only chain
Speaker 2: in trouble. The full service casual chain restaurant, as a category,
Speaker 2: what Sam Oaches, the editor of Nation's Restaurant News, calls
Speaker 2: the generic American bar and grill, is struggling. Last year,
Speaker 2: Red Lobster and TGI Friday's filed for bankruptcy. These restaurants
Speaker 2: lost customers during the coronavirus pandemic and have struggled to
Speaker 2: attract young diners. Coaches told me that who are quote
Speaker 2: more adventurous told me that men who are more adventurous,
Speaker 2: I think is what he meant to say here, it's
Speaker 2: a misprint. More adventurouses in quotes and want quote an
Speaker 2: exciting experience so they can post it to their social
Speaker 2: accounts in quotes. These chains could possibly restructure and turn
Speaker 2: their business around, but it's not likely. Experts in the
Speaker 2: restaurant industry I spoke with predicted, especially not for Hooters.
Speaker 2: So Hooters is on its way out. According to the Atlantic,
Speaker 2: this guy writing this article from the first person point
Speaker 2: of view not going to go to egg rices and
Speaker 2: an analysis of that because you can get it elsewhere.
Speaker 2: How about this, though, a popular chocolate bar is being
Speaker 2: recalled after reports of small stones in quotes. Manufacturer says,
Speaker 2: that's according to CBS News. I'll drop that link in
Speaker 2: the chatroom Atochelli dot com as well. And what popular
Speaker 2: chocolate bar are we talking about? Funny thing? It is
Speaker 2: not one of the well one of the less sustainable
Speaker 2: and ethical chocolate bars, which is most of what occupies
Speaker 2: shelves in America. You know your Mars and hershey and
Speaker 2: all that. They don't really care about how the cocoa
Speaker 2: is harvested, child labor, slave labor, absolute exploitation of people
Speaker 2: in places all over the world in order to harvest
Speaker 2: your cocoa. Happens for Hershey's and Cadbury and all them.
Speaker 2: But this is one of those brands, quite frankly, that
Speaker 2: is more ethical, more sustainable, little more expensive as well,
Speaker 2: and is usually not the problem child when it comes
Speaker 2: to problems like this. But apparently there was a problem
Speaker 2: with stones being in the candy. So let's go to
Speaker 2: the CBS article Real quick. Tony's Chalco Lonely said it's
Speaker 2: recalling some chocolate bars after twelve consumers reported finding quote
Speaker 2: small stones end quote in the products. The recall covers
Speaker 2: two products, It's six point three to five ounce dark
Speaker 2: Almond Sea Salt bar and the company six point three
Speaker 2: to five ounce Everything bar, which is a milk chocolate
Speaker 2: bar with caramel, pretzel, almond nougat and sea salt. The
Speaker 2: small stones weren't filtered during a third party's almond harvesting
Speaker 2: and almond processing, the company said in a statement Tuesday.
Speaker 2: Tony's Chalcoal Lonely is advising people who have the bars
Speaker 2: not to eat them. No injuries have been reported, it said.
Speaker 2: The bar can be returned to the store where they
Speaker 2: were bought get a refund or replacement. The company added
Speaker 2: the recalls cover bars sold both in the US and Canada.
Speaker 2: The lot numbers for recalled bars include Dark Common Sea
Speaker 2: Salt six point three five ounce lot numbers one six
Speaker 2: three zero nine four one six two six three four
Speaker 2: and m I six two six three four, Everything Bar
Speaker 2: Milk chocolate with caramel, pretzel, Alma nougat, and Sea Salt
Speaker 2: six point three five ounce to be recalled lot numbers
Speaker 2: four three two seven four three three zero, four three
Speaker 2: three one and M four three three one. In Canada,
Speaker 2: Dark Common Sea Salt one hundred and eighty grams Lot
Speaker 2: number one six two six nine seven and Everything Bar
Speaker 2: one hundred eighty grams Lot number four three three two
Speaker 2: are all subject to recall. The recalled products were sold
Speaker 2: starting in feb where the company added consumers can contact
Speaker 2: the chocolate company at five zero three three eight eight
Speaker 2: five nine nine zero Now again Tony's Chocolate Lonely is
Speaker 2: a rather colorful package chocolate and again uses fair trade cocoa.
Speaker 2: That's why I took notice of them, and I got
Speaker 2: a question, how in the hell look you can blame
Speaker 2: it on the initial sorder of the almonds and processor
Speaker 2: of the almonds. Or maybe it was a farmer who
Speaker 2: was not making enough on his almonds deciding to add
Speaker 2: weight to his bags. Who the hell knows, But if
Speaker 2: you got stones in him when they get delivered to
Speaker 2: you and they've been processed, I'm thinking there ought to
Speaker 2: be a process to again, double check and filter again.
Speaker 2: It's already an expensive chocolate bar. It was very expensive
Speaker 2: not too long ago, but seemed to go down in
Speaker 2: price as the popularity went up. As per usual, if
Speaker 2: you can make mass production in a wider you know,
Speaker 2: by larger numbers, you are able to produce things cheaper
Speaker 2: usually And these people again, we're using more ethical, more sustainable,
Speaker 2: and absolutely fair trade chocolate, right And for a definition
Speaker 2: of that, I go to fairtrade dot net. All right,
Speaker 2: just saying fair trade certified chocolate. Americans love chocolate and
Speaker 2: other products made with coco. It is part of our
Speaker 2: daily lives. At the same time, many people do not
Speaker 2: know how tough cocoa farming is, nor do they know
Speaker 2: the impact I'm choosing one chocolate bar over another. By
Speaker 2: choosing chocolate with the fair trade logo, you are standing
Speaker 2: up for the people in places involved in the cocoa industry. Okay,
Speaker 2: so that's from their website, and they even give a
Speaker 2: little bullet point thing here. True coco is a beloved commodity,
Speaker 2: Cocoa farmers often struggle to make a living. It is
Speaker 2: unacceptable that this one hundred plus billion dollar a year
Speaker 2: into history has excluded farmers and workers from the benefits
Speaker 2: of trade. This neglect has led to widespread poverty, deforestation,
Speaker 2: gender inequality, child labor, and forced labor. I don't know
Speaker 2: how gender inequality got in there, but child labor, force labor, deforestation,
Speaker 2: widespread poverty. Because they don't pay very much, everything has
Speaker 2: kept really really low priced, as per the usual capitalist model.
Speaker 2: And that's the way it is. I mean, there's a
Speaker 2: reason why slave labor was making iPhones for many years.
Speaker 2: I'm not sure if they still do, but why would
Speaker 2: they stop? All right, tariffs, right, even with those gigantic
Speaker 2: tariffs now going on China today, you know, on Liberation Day,
Speaker 2: I doubt it's going to change the price of the
Speaker 2: iPhone all that much because even with slave labor, they
Speaker 2: were charging a grand on the damn things. So you
Speaker 2: know how much cheaper you got to make it before
Speaker 2: you can get my iPhone to be less than one
Speaker 2: thousand dollars. Huh Oh, you're paying for the trademark. Huh yeah.
Speaker 2: Don't even think about it too much because right anyway,
Speaker 2: I already talked about Val Kilmer's cause of death and
Speaker 2: other things related to your food problems out there, which
Speaker 2: I'm thinking are gonna get worse. But there's also lots
Speaker 2: of weird news outside of chocolate bars with stones in them,
Speaker 2: eggs being too damn much, and everything else about to
Speaker 2: jump up. In price project twenty twenty five, architect bragged
Speaker 2: about killing a dog with a shovel, according to Rolling
Speaker 2: Stone and several other publications. Now, this guy has thus
Speaker 2: far tried to deny this, but apparently there's a story
Speaker 2: floating around. I mean, remember the whole thing with the
Speaker 2: you know are now head of Homeland Security. You know,
Speaker 2: Christy Nome proudly shooting her dog to death because she
Speaker 2: couldn't train it. That was interesting. Well, this one's a
Speaker 2: little more egregious and it's getting straight. Also, you know,
Speaker 2: I don't know why I relate this, but Donald Trump
Speaker 2: is not a fan of dogs. He doesn't like them,
Speaker 2: and he says they don't like him. I don't know
Speaker 2: where I picked up that fact from, but I know
Speaker 2: it's a fact. I think I had personal confirmation on that,
Speaker 2: and then I read about it somewhere else in one
Speaker 2: of the books about him. Anyway, Kevin Roberts former colleagues
Speaker 2: tell The Guardian that the Heritage Foundation president once recounted
Speaker 2: murdering his neighbor's pet. This is the guy who was
Speaker 2: the architect of Project twenty twenty five. By the way, Yeah,
Speaker 2: apparently the dog was barking too much, disturbing the family
Speaker 2: and all that. He hopped a fence and beat it
Speaker 2: to death with a shovel, according to the story, which
Speaker 2: he denies. I don't know. I don't know what to
Speaker 2: say except what the hell I mean? Sounds a little
Speaker 2: like serial killer behavior to me. But then again, if
Speaker 2: you're on board with Project twenty twenty five, even if
Speaker 2: you love dogs, who cares, right long as my stock
Speaker 2: market's doing well, Oh it's not really doing that well,
Speaker 2: but anyway. Elon Musk has an ominous message to Representative
Speaker 2: Maxine Waters after her Milania Trump threat. According to The Independent,
Speaker 2: I don't see it as much of a threat, Maxine
Speaker 2: Waters said something about maybe we should look into her
Speaker 2: and see if she needs to be deported Malania Trump
Speaker 2: because of all the talk of deportations, and Musk has
Speaker 2: pretty much responded with, you know, we have ways of
Speaker 2: dealing with you. So that's an interesting thing floating around
Speaker 2: in the interwebs, and who knows how that's going. Of course,
Speaker 2: Musk is making some of those statements on X but hey,
Speaker 2: what are you gonna do? Politics is politics, right? I
Speaker 2: know I mentioned Virginia Guffrey in that terrible accident. I
Speaker 2: know I mentioned journalists and the Trump family and all
Speaker 2: these other good things. The end of Hooters been Judge
Speaker 2: dismissing the Eric Adams case. Val Kilmer died. Yes, indeed,
Speaker 2: And oh, by the way, how is your inflation doing?
Speaker 2: Most people, apparently right now, think we're headed for inflation,
Speaker 2: although they think Trump's doing the right thing. So we're
Speaker 2: still dealing with the Biden effect? Is that what the
Speaker 2: argument is? I'm not certain? What do you think? Again?
Speaker 2: I'm not certain? But how about we try and stay certain.
Speaker 2: I'll probably have one more quick and I do mean
Speaker 2: super quick segment to hit here on this Wednesday night
Speaker 2: news show, just to make sure I've got everything squared
Speaker 2: away before I sign.
Speaker 14: On Revel like.
Speaker 4: Cal Sage, Oh Shell Fact, oh Sally Hate Fact.
Speaker 7: Raz and Trump like Jay ro Rd hop Back, I
Speaker 7: ain't on the world JR. Hop Back. Yeah, mm hmmm
Speaker 7: mm hmmm mm hmmm.
Speaker 23: Yeah, okay, truth.
Speaker 12: Go ahead in the Truth about the Day of hay assassination.
Speaker 2: Right, well, what do you want to know Judy Baker's.
Speaker 15: Wild claim Oswald girlfriends he knew Ruby and Barry cancer weapons.
Speaker 2: Really, I imagine I could claim I have four wheels.
Speaker 2: It doesn't make me a wagon. But okay, Oswald's was
Speaker 2: on the building and trying to prevent the murder of
Speaker 2: John Kennedy.
Speaker 24: Come on now, has a real effort on the day
Speaker 24: of hay assassination.
Speaker 16: Book into workin.
Speaker 2: Go to Amazon dot com enter Judith Baker in her
Speaker 2: own words. You'll get the results for a digital copy
Speaker 2: of a book where Walt Brown utilizes her own words
Speaker 2: and the known evidence in the case to get at
Speaker 2: well a different perspective. Let's say you can get Judithary
Speaker 2: Baker in her own words from the author himself signed
Speaker 2: if you request it by contacting doctor Brown at k
Speaker 2: I A S J F. K at Aol dot com.
Speaker 2: It's a fun book and it actually dissects the many,
Speaker 2: many fantastic claims. Judith very Baker, in her own words,
Speaker 2: thank you for all the great information dot com Radio, netword.
Speaker 25: Revelation through Conversation Chili dot com.
Speaker 2: Do you like history?
Speaker 25: Real history that you were never taught in schools? Why
Speaker 25: the Vietnam War Nuclear Bombs in nation Building in Southeast
Speaker 25: Asia by author Mike Swanson, with new documentation never seen
Speaker 25: before that'll open your eyes to events that.
Speaker 4: Led up to this.
Speaker 25: Why the Vietnam War Nuclear Bombs in Nation Building in
Speaker 25: Southeast Asia nineteen forty five through nineteen sixty one. Get
Speaker 25: your copy today at Amazon dot com. Why the Vietnam
Speaker 25: War by author Mike Swanson.
Speaker 26: Yo, Yo, This Doug Campbell, host of the Dallas Action
Speaker 26: Podcast presented by Wall Street Window. And you are listening
Speaker 26: to the o'chle effect Revelation through conversation.
Speaker 2: Again, Ready, get ready for anyway. We'll have to wait
Speaker 2: and see what happens with Liberation Day. Of course, we
Speaker 2: heard from Trump a bit about that today and we've
Speaker 2: been hearing about it for a while. The tariffs, the
Speaker 2: trade war, what is going to go down? Oh? By
Speaker 2: the way, are we taking over Greenland or not? Stay tuned.
Speaker 2: That's all I can say about it, you know, I mean,
Speaker 2: what else can you say at this point for that?
Speaker 23: It was not done by me.
Speaker 14: It was done through me.
Speaker 2: That's right. Pearls of wisdom from Rusty Shackleford there on,
Speaker 2: King of the Hill. I love that show, gotta tell you,
Speaker 2: and I did enjoy bringing you the news this time.
Speaker 2: Tried to keep it tight with the headlines, but went
Speaker 2: in depth on the JFK thing because it's important to me,
Speaker 2: and after all, we could spend hours and hours on
Speaker 2: the Internet trying to search things out, but instead I'd
Speaker 2: like to streamline it. So again, want to remind you
Speaker 2: that if you have an article in op ed a
Speaker 2: pear that you think nobody else would sanely publish because
Speaker 2: it's so strange, it's so far out there, you've got
Speaker 2: a point of view that you think nobody else is carrying,
Speaker 2: bring it to me, all right, info at o'chelly dot com.
Speaker 2: That's the email address to send it to, and put
Speaker 2: in the subject line the word submission. I've got a
Speaker 2: handful of pieces, and I don't want to spoil it,
Speaker 2: but I got a couple of interesting JFK writers and
Speaker 2: a few others that are going to speak about general
Speaker 2: things here, not just a news story of the day,
Speaker 2: but maybe trends that are occurring. Maybe it's poetry. I've
Speaker 2: got a piece of poetry. I've got to figure out
Speaker 2: how to publish, and I might ask for revisions or editions,
Speaker 2: but I really don't want to screw with your work.
Speaker 2: I want you to speak for yourselves, and I want
Speaker 2: you to become part of a rarefied news feed on
Speaker 2: my front page. What is that shinging noise? One of
Speaker 2: those stell both helicopters with computerized noise cancelation capability.
Speaker 6: They're still working the chins out.
Speaker 2: Wow.
Speaker 26: Do you know about stealth help cocks all dot conspiracy
Speaker 26: dot black dot helicopters.
Speaker 2: I loved that when I first saw it in the
Speaker 2: early two thousands, literally fell off the couch. I was
Speaker 2: leaning on sort of half sitting and half leaning, half
Speaker 2: laying on. That's three halves, so I don't know what
Speaker 2: I was doing there, but I was kind of on
Speaker 2: the couch and I started laughing so much I fell
Speaker 2: off of it. And the capra was this is really
Speaker 2: what almost made me pee myself after I fell off
Speaker 2: the couch watching this on broadcast static Fille Television in Lakewood,
Speaker 2: New Jersey.
Speaker 6: Yeah, man, I'll tell you what that dang old internet
Speaker 6: mane just going on there point and click getting into
Speaker 6: talking about ww dot w.
Speaker 2: Commy you got naked chicks on there, mane.
Speaker 6: You go click click, clicklicklicklick, clicklicklate.
Speaker 2: It's real easy, man, That's right, it is real, real
Speaker 2: easy man. Hopefully it's easy for you drop in something
Speaker 2: in the bucket. I do have one big bill coming
Speaker 2: up this month, and of course the big bills of
Speaker 2: just trying to stay fed and everything else. Plus I
Speaker 2: am working with JFK Lancer this year. We're gonna have
Speaker 2: a planning meeting pretty soon and it'll be uh, let's see,
Speaker 2: about six days after my birthday. We're gonna have another
Speaker 2: planning meeting, a conference call. My birthday is April seven.
Speaker 2: And we did finally reside to resolve those Super Bowl
Speaker 2: bets on the Uncle Show and all that good stuff.
Speaker 2: Hopefully I've got a new podcast or a new broadcast
Speaker 2: podcast to present very soon, and uh might even just
Speaker 2: turn this news show into something different. Plus we might
Speaker 2: move the Friday night call in show to another day.
Speaker 2: I haven't sorted that with b Pete yet. And also
Speaker 2: because Skype is going bye bye, we're gonna need a
Speaker 2: new methodology to bring the callers on. They don't call
Speaker 2: into Skype, but I use Skype to connect into my switchboard,
Speaker 2: and we're gonna need a brand new methodology to do
Speaker 2: that starting May first, So stick with us. We'll continue
Speaker 2: to develop, evolve, change, switch things in and out, and
Speaker 2: try and keep it roll and at least for the
Speaker 2: next year, because that's the thing. I got to pay
Speaker 2: for the for the podcast feed, which also produces the
Speaker 2: transcripts and does a lot of other things. I got
Speaker 2: to pay my speaker bill for the year. That's what
Speaker 2: I'm doing on guess what the fifteenth of April, which,
Speaker 2: by the way, if you haven't paid your taxes. It's
Speaker 2: confusing because the IRS is simultaneously brutal and inefficient and
Speaker 2: now being downsized by Doge. And I'm sure there'll be
Speaker 2: more Doze News and everything else. Because my last little
Speaker 2: tidbit of information is apparently there's stirrings. They're floating it around,
Speaker 2: and there's various reasons, not just because Tesla dealerships are
Speaker 2: under attack and the stock price has been tanking. But
Speaker 2: they might want to cut Elon's loose pretty soon. He
Speaker 2: might have outlived Hiss, his usefulness or his welcome with
Speaker 2: the White House. Not sure which came first. Chicken egg Trump,
Speaker 2: not sure, but the chicken and the eggs are too
Speaker 2: damn high, I'll tell you that much. Anyway, Hopefully you've
Speaker 2: noticed a couple of new sounds and a couple of
Speaker 2: new things happening with the network, and we're gonna try
Speaker 2: and keep that a role, and guaranteed we're gonna have
Speaker 2: a show on Friday. I have no idea what the
Speaker 2: plan is for tomorrow just yet. We had one cancelation
Speaker 2: from a guest. But next week I got plenty of
Speaker 2: stuff lined up and we'll see if I can surprise
Speaker 2: you or you can surprise me, okay, because that is
Speaker 2: the fun of all of this. And I hope to
Speaker 2: hear from you guys. I hope to see a couple
Speaker 2: of donations soon. I hope to get some more new ideas.
Speaker 2: You can also send those to info atochelly dot com
Speaker 2: as well podcast ideas volunteers. You want to be a
Speaker 2: broadcaster and join myself and be Pete, which are the
Speaker 2: only standing co hosts that have a constant gig here
Speaker 2: on the network. Let's do it because hey, hey it's
Speaker 2: Liberation Day. We heard what the papers had to say,
Speaker 2: and the restaurant eggflation and record filibusters all happened April
Speaker 2: Fool's Day and two day. I am merely o'chelly. All
Speaker 2: of you are the effect.
Speaker 14: Good night, nuclear holocaust.
Speaker 6: You know what uranium is, right, think called nuclear weapons
Speaker 6: and other things like lots of enough.
Speaker 2: You know what uranium is, right, Bad things and things
Speaker 2: have done with uranium?
Speaker 14: Were some bad things nuclear holocaust.
Speaker 6: You know what uranium.
Speaker 8: This is James wre At a quorter report dot com
Speaker 8: and you're listening to the affected dot.
Speaker 23: Com revelation through con say.
Speaker 7: Here is all shell a fact, lly reason true you
Speaker 7: the fact.
Speaker 24: The yeah.
Speaker 7: Mm hmm.
Speaker 2: Dot Com Radio