Speaker 1: You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KFI AM
Speaker 1: six forty.
Speaker 2: KFI AM six forty Bill Handle here on a Monday morning,
Speaker 2: December sixteenth, bottom of the hour. Do they have a
Speaker 2: case with Wayne? Eight? Twenty? Oh? Are we going to
Speaker 2: have fun with those drones over New Jersey for the
Speaker 2: most part now in California, over the Eastern seaboard. And
Speaker 2: I'm going to tell you the reason they're there, And
Speaker 2: it's called Project Blue Beam. It's the government doing this. No,
Speaker 2: I'll tell you why. Ooh, it's a very good one.
Speaker 2: All right. Now a moment or two talking about the
Speaker 2: holiday party, your holiday party if you work for a company. Okay,
Speaker 2: it used to be the tradition of bringing a partner
Speaker 2: to the office Christmas bash. Well, that's kind of fading quickly.
Speaker 2: Do you remember when we used to have our bashes,
Speaker 2: usually at Universal Studios in those days, and they'd rent
Speaker 2: out the top floor and they'd give away prices and
Speaker 2: it was kind of neat. Maybe it was before your time,
Speaker 2: but I love those and you'd bring someone it was
Speaker 2: plus one. Well, that doesn't happen anymore, it really doesn't.
Speaker 2: Most companies at this point are under a third of
Speaker 2: the companies are inviting plus ones, and that's down from
Speaker 2: fifty three half in twenty twenty one. And by the way,
Speaker 2: the plus ones the spouses don't mind not going at all.
Speaker 2: I mean it used to be a big deal. You know,
Speaker 2: when most families had one bread winner, the couple shared
Speaker 2: a connection to the one employer, and these holiday parties
Speaker 2: were like a joint reward. Today it's a chore to
Speaker 2: go to your spouse's party. It is. You know, workers
Speaker 2: don't even socialize with their own colleagues after hours. I mean,
Speaker 2: what a pain in the ass. Now. One reason why
Speaker 2: the companies aren't doing this anymore it's expensive rain and costs.
Speaker 2: But another reason is that since people don't connect the
Speaker 2: way they used to necked. We know that, especially since
Speaker 2: the pandemic, the holiday party is now a way for
Speaker 2: remote staffers or people that work apart from each other
Speaker 2: different parts of the building. It becomes a team bonding session.
Speaker 2: You get to know your workers, your co workers. You
Speaker 2: get to talk about stuff that is completely frivolous and insane.
Speaker 2: I get to if I were to go to the
Speaker 2: company party, you know what I do. I talk about
Speaker 2: my new dog, which incidentally is up on Instagram. Okay,
Speaker 2: you get to meet my new dog is about lah
Speaker 2: because after I've told you this story, my previous dog
Speaker 2: became a coyote or derv a few weeks ago and
Speaker 2: it got It was not a pleasant thing, It really wasn't.
Speaker 2: So we replaced. We replaced Gucci with actually even more
Speaker 2: of a little snack, and that is Isabella. And you
Speaker 2: go to Instagram at Bill Handle show and you'll see
Speaker 2: what my dog loves looks like.
Speaker 3: She's such a love.
Speaker 2: Okay, so back we go to the party. Okay, fewer
Speaker 2: plus ones are invited. Why because they don't make any
Speaker 2: sense anymore and people just aren't interested. Now there's a
Speaker 2: bunch of different ways of doing it. We used to
Speaker 2: many years ago have the holiday party. We all get together,
Speaker 2: and it was that's when everybody at least pretended to
Speaker 2: like each other. Working here today, no one even cares.
Speaker 2: You know that I hate all the other hosts. They
Speaker 2: all hate me. We don't have any kind of relationship together.
Speaker 2: There are people that have been on the show and
Speaker 2: have been together for you know, dozens of years. They
Speaker 2: don't even talk to each other outside the show. Although
Speaker 2: I have to be honest, we used to have to
Speaker 2: pretend that we kind of liked each other and we
Speaker 2: were one family. Remember that, Neil, I am still in that. Yeah,
Speaker 2: well we don't pretend anymore. We don't pretend now, it's reality.
Speaker 2: And this year with and this is what something does
Speaker 2: the iHeart people do, which is a little different, is
Speaker 2: everybody gets to go either to Disneyland for the big
Speaker 2: Holiday party or the California Adventures was this year, and
Speaker 2: they actually rent out the park. I think they have
Speaker 2: a deal with you know, commercials, and I think Coast
Speaker 2: has been involved in that for I don't know how
Speaker 2: many dozens of years. So the iHeart Party this year,
Speaker 2: it's a plus one and it was just fun. It
Speaker 2: wasn't about bonding, it wasn't about your meeting with your
Speaker 2: co workers. It was just about having a good time,
Speaker 2: which doesn't happen very often. Did I go to the
Speaker 2: holiday party? I did not. What were the reasons? First
Speaker 2: of all, it's late for starters, midweek, and also I
Speaker 2: had no idea there was a holiday party. That is
Speaker 2: a little tough one. No one told me.
Speaker 1: Didn't get the memo.
Speaker 2: Huh No, I didn't get the memo. That is correct.
Speaker 3: Technically three there was the Coast.
Speaker 4: Party, which becomes everyone's party, and that was California Adventure.
Speaker 4: And then gosh, what is it my FM? Do they
Speaker 4: do them?
Speaker 1: That's Mary Farm?
Speaker 3: Yet not's Mary Farm? And we were allowed to go
Speaker 3: to that.
Speaker 4: And then there was the one at our studios down
Speaker 4: the street at the iHeart Theater.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I heard about that one. I wasn't invited to
Speaker 2: that one either. I heard that it was a little
Speaker 2: sparse this year. So the homeless shelter down the street
Speaker 2: that got all the extra food that wasn't eating really
Speaker 2: appreciated that party.
Speaker 3: I wonder why it was sparse.
Speaker 2: So maybe next year you guys will tell me about it.
Speaker 2: I mean, I still won't go, but I'd sure like
Speaker 2: to be told about it. You know, I feel exclusive
Speaker 2: to show up. I feel excluded exactly this. By the way,
Speaker 2: this is not stick. I'm not making this up. I
Speaker 2: was not told about the party.
Speaker 3: You don't read your emails.
Speaker 2: No, not only that. Hold on, well, there's also I
Speaker 2: don't have a iHeart email too. You know that.
Speaker 3: I know that.
Speaker 4: Yeah, However, you know, the reality is you kind of
Speaker 4: told me two three. There's four people left that still
Speaker 4: are okay with you and we all work for you.
Speaker 4: Everyone else despises you. You don't work for me, you
Speaker 4: don't well work with you with me? Yeah, that's true.
Speaker 2: You don't. Come on, you don't work for me. I
Speaker 2: don't have anybody there who works for me. I mean,
Speaker 2: I've had people work for me, and believe me, I
Speaker 2: treat them very differently than I treat you. Actually, no,
Speaker 2: that's not true. That's no, that's not true at all. Okay,
Speaker 2: by the way, Kno, it's a break. Go get me
Speaker 2: a cup of coffee, would you please? Okay, see, there
Speaker 2: you go. As a matter of fact, when I asked
Speaker 2: Andy of me a cup of coffe at the same break,
Speaker 2: I get two cups of coffee. Hey, I was going
Speaker 2: to do the story about the Supreme Court weighing in
Speaker 2: on a case involving California's power to clean its air,
Speaker 2: but I ran two segments on the health segment. So
Speaker 2: what I want to do is I'll put that away
Speaker 2: till tomorrow. But more fun is what's going on with
Speaker 2: those drones over the eastern seaboard, particularly in New Jersey
Speaker 2: and now here in California. And as you can imagine,
Speaker 2: the conspiracy theory explodes because when in doubt when the
Speaker 2: government doesn't know what's going on. And at this point,
Speaker 2: the government doesn't know what's going on. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: nobody knows what's going on with these drones. All of
Speaker 2: a sudden, there are hundreds of sightings. Now as the
Speaker 2: various authorities are investigating, it turns out the majority of
Speaker 2: them are in fact airplanes. But this hysteria has comeing
Speaker 2: to play where they're all drones. It almost you're going
Speaker 2: back to the nineteen thirties War of the Worlds with
Speaker 2: Orson Wells and the Mercury Theater where the invasion of
Speaker 2: Martians came in. And it was New Jersey where the
Speaker 2: Martians landed and the whole country panicked. And it was
Speaker 2: a straight out parody. It was a skit. It was
Speaker 2: their version of an SNL skit, except there was an
Speaker 2: entire radio program that described in detail, with specificity, how
Speaker 2: the Martians were landing and what they look like and
Speaker 2: the spacecraft and it got the country by I mean,
Speaker 2: total surprise. And then to this day it's considered one
Speaker 2: of the iconic radio programs. So, and that was a
Speaker 2: conspiracy theory that Orson Wells came up with. So now
Speaker 2: you've got these drones flying overhead. Now, since most are
Speaker 2: airplanes planes in the sky, there are a few, well,
Speaker 2: it's more than a few that are unexplained, except they
Speaker 2: are being explained. It's Project blue Beam. And what it does.
Speaker 2: It is created by the global elites to fake an
Speaker 2: alien invasion. Okay, now what's going on? It is a
Speaker 2: conspiracy theory of the first water. Adam Kinsinger, former Republican
Speaker 2: congressman and critic of Trump who had to leave, responded
Speaker 2: to a post by who Roseanne Barr, who's a Trump supporter,
Speaker 2: and she posts, now I see why I mentioned Project
Speaker 2: blue Beam every week on my podcast. She is a
Speaker 2: conspiracy theorist, and she talked about Project blue Beam, and
Speaker 2: she says, now, now I see what I've been talking
Speaker 2: about it. Last week, Alex Jones posted about Project blue
Speaker 2: Beam on x sharing a prior interview with a ufologist,
Speaker 2: UFO logist or ufologist, Stephen Greer, explaining how Project Bluebeam
Speaker 2: will be used. So what is Project blue Beam? It
Speaker 2: actually originated. It's a conspiracy theory that originated the nineteen nineties,
Speaker 2: and it was proposed by a Canadian described as a journalist.
Speaker 2: But I wouldn't call him a journalist, Sergey Monast or
Speaker 2: Surge Monast And he died in nineteen ninety six. And
Speaker 2: here's what it alleges. It is a covert operation by
Speaker 2: global elites to establish a totalitarian world government by orchestrating
Speaker 2: fake celestial or supernatural events use NASA technology, futuristic NASHA technology,
Speaker 2: and proponents of the theory expected it to begin in
Speaker 2: nineteen ninety five, Well it didn't happen. How about nineteen
Speaker 2: ninety six, No, that didn't happen. And after Monass died,
Speaker 2: it was going to be the millennium, the year two thousand,
Speaker 2: Well that didn't happen either. But according to the theory,
Speaker 2: its advanced holographic technology would be used to protect project
Speaker 2: images of religious figures or extraterrestrial invasions in the skies,
Speaker 2: tailor to specific beliefs, and would aim to deceive populations,
Speaker 2: entire populations, and create this global panic, dismantle existing religious
Speaker 2: and social structures, is the way I'm reading this. As
Speaker 2: this described and the theory outline several stages. First, earthquakes
Speaker 2: would be triggered to unearth hidden artifacts proving that existing
Speaker 2: religions are false. Next, holographic projections would simulate the return
Speaker 2: of divine figures customized to each region, followed by a
Speaker 2: unifying God speaking to all people. For example, for Christians,
Speaker 2: you would see this holographic figure of Jesus coming back
Speaker 2: and talking to you. For Muslims, it would be I
Speaker 2: guess Mohammad. For Hindus it would be Vishnu, Vishnu, Vishnu
Speaker 2: with you. For Jews, it would be a holographic image
Speaker 2: of the FED Building in Washington, d C. Every single
Speaker 2: religion would be covered by these holographic images and would
Speaker 2: tell you the invasion is here. So whatever deity you
Speaker 2: believed in would say, the invasion is here. Finally, that
Speaker 2: technology would manipulate human thoughts and would create the illusion
Speaker 2: of direct communication with these deity deities and simulate that
Speaker 2: alien invasion. Why to create and justify authoritarian control by
Speaker 2: the elites around the world, the rich people around the
Speaker 2: world that want to control the world, and they're going
Speaker 2: to do it through this technology that creates holographic images
Speaker 2: that convinces you that the deities are here. It's fascinating. Oh,
Speaker 2: by the way, you think that's not getting some legs there,
Speaker 2: You bet it is. It's conspiracy time until they figure
Speaker 2: out what these drones are. And you know, it's like
Speaker 2: UFOs okay, UFOs are out there, and it proves for
Speaker 2: some reason that there's aliens that come and visit Earth.
Speaker 2: And I've always wondered why the aliens don't land in
Speaker 2: the middle of Wilshire Boulevard on a saturdn night and
Speaker 2: talk to us. It's always someplace out in the hinterlands.
Speaker 2: The for forefe and land right, You'd think they'd land
Speaker 2: in the middle of Dodger Stadium in the middle of
Speaker 2: the World Series. Boy, that would impress people. That's when
Speaker 2: the Martians come out and droves. Why would they be
Speaker 2: out there? Well, I saw them, and it's in my
Speaker 2: favorite of the Martian anal probes. Those are the biggest ones.
Speaker 2: I've always enjoyed those. I listened to George Nori right,
Speaker 2: some farmer in Kansas, Man, I was sitting there out
Speaker 2: with my field and was cutting my hay, and all
Speaker 2: of a sudden, this saucer came down and a beam
Speaker 2: came down, and I didn't know what happened, and I
Speaker 2: was returned to Earth, you know, after a few hours,
Speaker 2: and it turned out there was a Martian anal probe.
Speaker 2: They had taken this anal probe and put it where
Speaker 2: the sun don't shine to actually to study us. By
Speaker 2: the way, that is a real topic on George, which
Speaker 2: I heard. And how do you know what happened? Because
Speaker 2: they had the guy had a real sore ass and
Speaker 2: he determined and the the ufologist determined it was the
Speaker 2: Martian aino probe.
Speaker 4: I you're talking about an incredibly advanced civilization that can
Speaker 4: travel outside of art, our known, our ability to know
Speaker 4: their existence faster than the speed of light.
Speaker 3: And they've come here to look in our rear end.
Speaker 2: That's correct. Or they've come here to look at us
Speaker 2: and study us, right, or they come in and look
Speaker 2: at us saying come down and go take me to
Speaker 2: your leader. That's how we got the metro system. Okay,
Speaker 2: all right, I'm done. I'm completely done.
Speaker 4: I'm gonna find my drone tonight for sure, Project Boopy.
Speaker 2: I want to remind you on Fridays at A thirty,
Speaker 2: there are a couple segments of ask handle anything, and
Speaker 2: this is where you asked me and I just answer,
Speaker 2: I mean virtually every question. You have personal questions, I
Speaker 2: don't care, just not your political views. I don't give
Speaker 2: a rats about that. And here's how you do it
Speaker 2: during the course of this show. You go to the
Speaker 2: iHeart app and you download, or you go to Kfi
Speaker 2: upper right hand corner a microphone, click on that. You
Speaker 2: have fifteen seconds to ask me anything you want and
Speaker 2: I will answer with a couple of limitations, but not many.
Speaker 2: So it's ask handle anything. You can do it at
Speaker 2: any time. No, you have to do it during the
Speaker 2: course of this show, I think, and will Neil, Wayne,
Speaker 2: you're giving me the weird look. It's time for Wayne
Speaker 2: Rusnick and do they have a case.
Speaker 5: Let's just jump right into question for at handle anything.
Speaker 5: Has anybody asked yet?
Speaker 1: Why are you this way?
Speaker 2: Yeah? They have it. I have no answer. Neil has
Speaker 2: an answer. That is, when I was a little one,
Speaker 2: my parents tropped me on my head and that seems
Speaker 2: to be the only answer. So let's get to it.
Speaker 2: Running a little bit late.
Speaker 1: So we'll go quickly.
Speaker 5: Just take your pick for the first segment here very quickly,
Speaker 5: Batman in a pickup truck or the case of the
Speaker 5: chicken juice?
Speaker 2: Oh, what do you think? Always go to the default?
Speaker 2: You go to the chicken.
Speaker 5: Here we go this involves a personal injury lawsuit filed
Speaker 5: by a woman who fell in the meat aisle at
Speaker 5: a Public's supermarket. She filled out an incident report before
Speaker 5: she left. She said she slipped on some chicken juice
Speaker 5: coming from under the coolers, and there were witnesses who said, oh, yeah,
Speaker 5: there was chicken juice on the ground over there. There
Speaker 5: certainly was. Now four years goes by, she files her
Speaker 5: lawsuit against Publics. She wants half a million dollars, and
Speaker 5: they take a little looksie at the video, and it
Speaker 5: turns out in the you can see her looking down
Speaker 5: at the floor where there's some liquid, looking around at
Speaker 5: the other customers, sliding her foot back and forth through
Speaker 5: the chicken juice, and then bracing herself on the edge
Speaker 5: of the coolers before finger quotes falling down. So the
Speaker 5: insurance company for public says this is fraud and they
Speaker 5: refer her to the authorities and she is charged with fraud.
Speaker 5: Now they do dismiss the case, but she still insists
Speaker 5: that she has a civil claim for slipping in the
Speaker 5: chicken juice, because she says you can't prove she doesn't
Speaker 5: deny what's on the video, but she says you can't
Speaker 5: prove I knew there was juice there before I fell,
Speaker 5: and therefore I still have a case.
Speaker 1: What does Bill Handle say, does she no?
Speaker 2: Of course not. I mean almost has to be a
Speaker 2: trick question because it's so ludicrous because first of all,
Speaker 2: the way you described it, it's on video everything she did,
Speaker 2: and she doesn't deny it, and I don't know how
Speaker 2: she gets away with that because it's all there, it's clear.
Speaker 2: Here's my question, how do they drop the case of
Speaker 2: fraud because it looks like this was set up and
Speaker 2: this is intentional, that's the question. So I don't know
Speaker 2: how she possibly can prevail on this one. It seems
Speaker 2: to me impossible. You tell me which way it.
Speaker 5: Went, well, yeah, she.
Speaker 2: Has no claim.
Speaker 5: And also you said why didn't they go forward with
Speaker 5: the criminal charges? And apparently it was because the insurance
Speaker 5: company knew that it was fraud and so she never
Speaker 5: got any money, and they felt like it just wasn't
Speaker 5: a priority to criminally prosecute her for fraud in a
Speaker 5: case where she didn't really she didn't actually take any
Speaker 5: of that money.
Speaker 1: One more quick thing that's in the case.
Speaker 5: Do you do you think that the police had probable
Speaker 5: cause to charge her with fraud.
Speaker 2: She says no, well, certainly after the video, Yes, that
Speaker 2: video seems to be uh just completely what's the word
Speaker 2: I'm looking for? Completely? Now? My question is, before we
Speaker 2: take a break, what about the statute? If this is
Speaker 2: four years later, did it fall within the statute of limitations?
Speaker 5: You know, that's the part that's not clear to me.
Speaker 5: Why she waited four years and whether or not four
Speaker 5: years later? Maybe that maybe in Florida the statute is
Speaker 5: four years Okay, I don't know. She doesn't silk, She
Speaker 5: doesn't sound like a the greatest of people in problem
Speaker 5: was not able to attract the greatest of lawyers.
Speaker 2: See. I was all excited there for a moment when
Speaker 2: you said chicken juice. I thought it was gonna be
Speaker 2: some inappropriate sexual perversion.
Speaker 1: Case and it was an animal husbandry claim, yeah.
Speaker 2: Or something along those lines with chicken juice. I mean
Speaker 2: I've been to that website, all right.
Speaker 4: I was coming fewsed too, because I got chicken jews
Speaker 4: was the name of your gang.
Speaker 2: Oh that's very story. Not quite, It's close. It's close,
Speaker 2: all right, Quaene.
Speaker 5: Yes, this case is rated PG thirteen at least, maybe
Speaker 5: maybe PG sixteen minimum, just so people are warned.
Speaker 1: It starts with a nine to one to one call.
Speaker 5: Hey, there's some guy sitting in his pickup truck in
Speaker 5: the parking lot of.
Speaker 1: The high school.
Speaker 5: But he's he's an older man, and he kind of
Speaker 5: looks nervous and he definitely looks out of place. So
Speaker 5: cop shows up, sees the truck, sees the guy in
Speaker 5: the truck.
Speaker 1: Hey, buddy, what's going on?
Speaker 5: And the guy says, Oh, I'm just here meeting my
Speaker 5: friend who's not doesn't go to the school or anything.
Speaker 5: It's an adult friend. I'm just going to meet them here. Oh, okay, Hey,
Speaker 5: do you mind if I get to your driver's license
Speaker 5: just take a look?
Speaker 2: Sure?
Speaker 5: Sure, and over to get a striver's relations and the
Speaker 5: cop notices this guy's shorts are pulled down and he
Speaker 5: can see the guy's rear end.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 5: He also notices, the cop does there's a towel spread
Speaker 5: over the back seat in the truck. Meanwhile, the suspect
Speaker 5: gets nervouser and nervouser. I know that's probably not a
Speaker 5: real word or grammar, and is sweating and all of this.
Speaker 5: So the guy says, I'll tell you what, Why don't
Speaker 5: you step out of the truck for me, and he does,
Speaker 5: and then the cop sees a gym bag, and sticking
Speaker 5: out of the gym bag in full view is what
Speaker 5: is colloquially known as a penis pump. Also, and you
Speaker 5: want to talk about observant skills of a police officer,
Speaker 5: the cop notices there's condensation on the inside of the pump,
Speaker 5: suggesting it had been used recently.
Speaker 2: Now, are you going in a direction where somehow any
Speaker 2: of this is bad?
Speaker 1: Yes I am.
Speaker 2: Okay, Oh yes you will.
Speaker 5: You will regret, you will, you will soon regret, implying
Speaker 5: that this man did nothing wrong.
Speaker 1: So then the guy says, oh, that's not mine. Okay.
Speaker 5: Now the cop says, uh, can I just look in
Speaker 5: your truck to make sure there are no weapons? And
Speaker 5: he does, and there's no weapons, but he did find
Speaker 5: the guy's cell phone in his wallet and two tiny
Speaker 5: bottles of whiskey wish he didn't take. The police did
Speaker 5: not remove them from the truck, but he found them.
Speaker 5: He said, you want to tell me again why you're here,
Speaker 5: and he said, oh, I'm meeting a friend. And then,
Speaker 5: because now they know who he is, it turns out
Speaker 5: he has an open criminal investigation for sexting a fifteen
Speaker 5: year old girl who happens to have the same first
Speaker 5: name as the first name of the adult friend that
Speaker 5: he claimed to be waiting to meet.
Speaker 1: So at that point they arrest him.
Speaker 5: For trying to meet with a minor. Okay, then, of course,
Speaker 5: now they can inventory the truck, and they got a
Speaker 5: search warrant for his phone and his iCloud account.
Speaker 1: Hey guess what they found.
Speaker 5: Yes, sexually explicit photos and videos of him and this
Speaker 5: fifteen year old girl, including an appearance in the video
Speaker 5: by the penis pump. So now he's charged with a possessing,
Speaker 5: receiving and making child pornography, traveling in interstate commerce with
Speaker 5: the intent to have sexual contact with a minor.
Speaker 1: He moves to suppress the evidence.
Speaker 5: He says, you never had probable cause to seize me.
Speaker 1: I e arrest me.
Speaker 5: So the you know, the search warrant's bad, and all
Speaker 5: the stuff that you found, especially the stuff on my phone,
Speaker 5: it's no good. And the district court says, oh, it's
Speaker 5: totally good. It's fine because you were not arrested or
Speaker 5: seized until you were asked to get out of the truck,
Speaker 5: at which point they had already seen enough. So he says,
Speaker 5: bs on that everybody, and goes to the Third Circuit
Speaker 5: Court of Appeals.
Speaker 1: What do you think they did?
Speaker 5: Does he have a case that they acted too soon
Speaker 5: and they should suppress all of that evidence?
Speaker 1: Or is he cooked?
Speaker 2: I think that there's just too many holes in putting
Speaker 2: all of that together. I would go particularly. They find
Speaker 2: the penis pump also known as the schwanselator, and it
Speaker 2: is condensation on a schwanzlator. I mean, I've never had
Speaker 2: condensation on mine, and so I don't quite get where
Speaker 2: it all connects.
Speaker 3: But to have a better seal, probably.
Speaker 2: It probably does. So I'm saying, you know, it's logical,
Speaker 2: but I think, well, let me go the other way.
Speaker 2: As soon as he said no, you know what, I
Speaker 2: can see both. I can see both sides of it.
Speaker 2: I really can. So I could argue both sides and
Speaker 2: I would be okay with decision on either side. Which
Speaker 2: way did they go?
Speaker 5: They said he's cooked. The pump was in plane view,
Speaker 5: so no issue there fight seeing it.
Speaker 1: You saw it.
Speaker 5: The keys and his cell phone and his wallet were
Speaker 5: seized pursuant to his arrest.
Speaker 1: The towel and.
Speaker 5: The whiskey bottles, and the digital evidence from the phone
Speaker 5: were all seized pursuant to search warrants. Also, they say
Speaker 5: the police would have inevitably discovered it all the doctrine
Speaker 5: of inevitability nothing suppressed. Therefore, boy, does he not have
Speaker 5: a leg to stand on? And he loses? And doesn't
Speaker 5: he when he goes into the system too.
Speaker 2: Doesn't even have an erect penis to stand on, does he? Okay,
Speaker 2: we're done.
Speaker 3: Guys, I just want l plod the dick? Uh what
Speaker 3: the detective?
Speaker 4: Oh?
Speaker 2: We could go so far, but we are out of time.
Speaker 2: Back again tomorrow and Wayne, we'll catch you next week.
Speaker 2: Today was particularly X rated. Don't you think it's a
Speaker 2: little worse?
Speaker 1: It was a nice PG thirteen and clinical, Yes.
Speaker 4: It was, Wayne, is it isn't the weird response to say,
Speaker 4: know that that erectile pump is not mine, I'm holding
Speaker 4: it for a friend.
Speaker 1: That's super suspicious.
Speaker 5: I'm just really, what was the point that was the
Speaker 5: point at which they knew they they had a bad
Speaker 5: man on their hands.
Speaker 2: Okay, we're we're out of here. Wayne, We'll catch you
Speaker 2: next week, same time tomorrow. A five am wake up
Speaker 2: call with Amy the rest of us come aboard. From
Speaker 2: six on This is KFI Am sixty. You've been listening
Speaker 2: to The Bill Handle Show, Catch My Show Monday through Friday,
Speaker 2: six am to nine am, and anytime on demand on
Speaker 2: the iHeartRadio app