Speaker 1: Check it out college football on the West Coast. This
is Get Off My Pylon, a look at the PAC
twelve and more, part of the College Gridiron Coast to
Coast podcast network.
Speaker 2: Here's your host, that Zemmo.
Speaker 3: Welcome to the LA's edition of Get Off My Pilon
college football podcast.
Speaker 2: This is your host, Matt Zemach.
Speaker 3: This is part of the College grid airon Coast to
Coast podcast network. Follow and look for your favorite College
grid airon Coast to Coast podcasts at Apple wherever you
listen to your podcasts, and also follow College Gridiron Coast
to Coast on Twitter at Gridiron Coast. So another college
Gridron podcast coming your wave with here with Get Off
My Pylon covering Western college football in the United States.
And you know, once more, we have a wave of
realignment stuff to have to talk about, not our preference
to talk about, but we obviously have to deal with
that just because it's just so prominent, front and center
in the news, and a lot of Western schools and
Western conferences are affected by all of this, so we
have to deal with it.
Speaker 2: Off the top. So, Utah State to the PAC.
Speaker 3: Twelve and apparently UNLV and Air Force did sign agreements
to stay in the Mountain West. But with Utah State
going to the PAC twelve, what that's meant is that
the Mountain West membership isn't uniformly on board, and that
gives UNLV and Air Force reason to say, hey, this
is not what we signed up for. You know, we
signed up for the full conference, you know, the members
staying behind, remaining together, and that meant Utah State. So
Utah State going to the PAC twelve has thrown a
monkey wrench into all of this. UNLV and Air Force
are reconsidering options, at least as we record this show
early in the week on a Tuesday day after Monday's
whirlwind of realignment news. So well, who would have thunk
it right, Utah State being at the center of a
power struggle within the Mountain West, and we have the
PAC twelve suing the Mountain West not for exit fees,
but for penalty fees relating to PACK twelve Mountain West
scheduling agreements. But it's not the exit fees, but it's
separate penalty fees that the PAC twelve doesn't want to pay.
And this is all just a clown car. This is
all very sad, very pathetic. You wonder why the PAC
twelve and Mountain West aren't merging and the value of
a merger for those who haven't heard it already written
about and talked about it a lot at Trotan's Wire
and other places over the past year or so. But
if the PAC twelve and Mountain West merge, we're not
talking about exit fees.
Speaker 2: No one has to.
Speaker 3: Pay exit fees or penalty fees to anyone else the conference.
The two conferences can get along, they could have a
larger membership so they cover the Pacific and Mountain time
zones and the various markets within. You could get a
pretty good basketball league from this. You know, the Mountain
West has been really good in college basketball. The PAC
twelve has lost UCLA and Arizona, So you know, hey,
bringing in not just San Diego State in Colorado State,
but bringing in you know, New Mexico UNLV, you know
that would carry real value. And of course the PAC
twelve is in discussions with Gonzaga. Nothing official, nothing final
on that front. But you know, if the PAC twelve
did merge with the Mountain West, you'd think, hey, maybe
that makes things a little bit more appealing to Gonzaga
in terms of going into a basketball league where, hey,
you get to play at the Pit in Albuquerque, you
get to play San Diego State, you get to play
Boisees Date, you get to play Colorado State, you get
to play in Vegas at UNLV. You know, lots of
lots of interesting possibilities. But what the PAC twelve and
Mountain West are doing with this infighting is they're fighting
over fees. The PAC twelve apparently, you know, seems to
be contesting these penalty fees. But on the other hand,
it seems to be willing to pay the exit fees
for the four Mountain West schools that have brought in,
and presumably it would pay would pay a portion of
the exit fee for Utah State. Now, why, why, if
you're the PAC twelve, why are you doing this? Why
couldn't instead of paying exit fees for Mountain West schools
that are joining your conference? Why can't you get a merger?
Why can't you agree to a deal for a merger
with the Mountain West. Why can't you find a more
peaceful way to go about all of this?
Speaker 2: It just doesn't make sense. And I do.
Speaker 3: Go back to what I mentioned on last week's get
off my pile on that. You know, if why did
the PAC twelve invite these four Mountain West schools? First,
I'm not saying it was a mistake to invite those
four schools Boise State, Colorado State, San Diego State, Fresno State.
Not saying it was a mistake to invite them, because
you do need the southern California footprint with San Diego
State and the Aztecs. You do need the Denver market,
Colorado State, you know, not that far from Denver in
Fort Collins. You know, Fresno another school, you know, that's
basically in southern California, I mean north of Los Angeles.
But still one can reasonably call Fresno State southern California
or at least, you know, Inland California, not that far
away from LA and surrounding parts. I mean, it's definitely
not northern California. So you know, you're giving yourself a
footprint in areas where you need a footprint. I'm not
saying or suggesting that it was bad to invite those schools.
My issue has been with the sequencing, with the order
of invitation. Why don't why wouldn't you invite Memphis and
Tulane and South Florida and Texas San Antonio. First, why
not get those schools on board? And then then not
just those four Mountain West schools you invited, but the
rest of the Mountain West might think, hmm, maybe now
is the time for a merger, or maybe more Mountain
West schools would have been amenable to, you know, migrate
over to the PAC twelve. Merger talks put it accelerated.
But by inviting the four Mountain West schools, you basically
fractured the Mountain West conference. You didn't create good will.
And yet you basically said that, Okay, we're willing to
pay exit fees now. Instead of paying exit fees, why
aren't you giving more money to Oregon State in Washington State?
Like that just that just baffles me. That shouldn't Oregon
State and want Washington State be pocketing at least a
chunk of this money instead of the money being paid
out for exit fees. I mean, and if the PAC
twelve didn't have a plan to get the eight teams
the eight football members it needs to be eligible for
college Football playoff qualification in twenty twenty six, If the
PAC twelve didn't have another plan in place. That's just
a staggering lack of foresight. It's a staggering it's also
a staggering failure at the negotiating table to not make
this look appealing for the Mountain West. Hey, we get
to merge, we get to combine our resources, no one
has to pay any penalties. We can really have a
great basketball league that gets a lot of NCAA tournament
win shares, win units, and pump's revenue into the conference,
and we get that college football playoff eligibility just blown
away by the failure of negotiation. That what is so entrenched,
what is so entrenched about all of this, What is
so entrenched about all of this that it is creating
this kind of Cold war. I mean, you know the
United States and the Soviet Union, that's a Cold war.
You know the other great conflicts around the world. You know,
we can understand like centuries old grievances over religion and
territory and all that. PAC twelve in the Mountain West
should not be having this kind of epic fight. You know,
just how much it is there on the table, like
these are these conferences aren't going to become what the
big twelve has become with a really robust basketball brand,
you know, with Arizona and Houston and Kansas and all
these other high end basketball schools. I mean, sorry, the
PAC twelve, that ship has sailed. Now, the PAC twelve
could invite Gonzaga and Saint Mary's for basketball, but that
has nothing to do with football, which is which is
the main thing that we're talking about, and inviting these
other schools, And why the PAC twelve felt it had
to invite four Mountain West schools first instead of getting outside.
Speaker 2: Schools into the fold.
Speaker 3: And then making it so much more attractive for the
Mountain West schools to join on the back end later
on in the process.
Speaker 2: I just don't understand that the.
Speaker 3: Other possibility that the PAC twelve either couldn't or wouldn't pursue.
Why don't you invite eight schools at the same time, Like,
why don't you invite the four Mountain West schools and
Memphis and Tulane and South Florida and Texas San Antonio,
those eight schools instead of inviting four first and then
hoping to get four later. Why wasn't this done in
a way that you invited all eight schools four from
the AAC four from the Mountain West all at the
same same time. Then you have a PAC ten those
eight schools plus Washington State and Oregon State, and you
don't need to invite others, now you, I mean, you
could invite Gonzaga and Saint Mary's for basketball, but like,
you don't need any more football representatives if you get
four from the AAC and then your four schools from
the Mountain West. But the PAC twelve just invited four,
and it invited four schools without inviting also UNLV. And
it's just so crazy. And of course maybe things will
change in the coming days. But as we record this
get off my Pylon podcast right now, UNLV is stuck.
UNLV is caught in between. Should we stay in the
Mountain West, which has now lost another member to the
PAC twelve Utah State, or should we now you know,
reverse course, and should we actually go to the PAC twelve.
Why didn't the PAC twelve invite UNLV in that package
of schools with the other four Mountain West schools, And really,
why didn't the PAC twelve just invite the six Mountain
West schools the four that had already invited, plus Utah
State plus unlv Why was this chopped up into smaller pieces?
It makes no sense. But we're gonna obviously see what
happens in the coming weeks. I would say that, you know,
so there is still value inviting for the Pac twelve
Gonzaga and Saint Mary's as basketball only members.
Speaker 2: We'll see if that happens.
Speaker 3: That would, obviously, you know, juice up the Pac twelve's
basketball brand after the departures of Arizona and UCLA to
the Big twelve and Big Ten, respectively. But if I'm
and let's just briefly look at this from Gonzaga's point
of view, wouldn't you rather join the Big twelve to
play with Kansas and Arizona and Houston and those other
high end schools instead of going to the Pac twelve, Like,
if you're gonna bother to pack up your bags and
leave the West Coast Conference, wouldn't you want to go
to the Big Leagues? And the Big Twelve in basketball
is the Big Leagues? Like, there's not going to be
a deeper college basketball conference than the Big twelve. Why
would you leave the Pac twelve when the Big twelve
is sitting right there? And Brett Yormark has made overtures
to you. So if I'm Gonzaga, I'm thinking, if I'm
not going to stay in the West Coast Conference, the
Big twelve is clearly the more attractive option. But if
you're the PAC twelve, I think you definitely make a
run right now at Gonzaga and Saint Mary's. Bring them
in as a companions, as companions a two for one,
so that you know, like you wouldn't have a Pack nine, right,
you'd have a PAC ten. You bring in at least
one more football school to get eight, and then you
bring in Gonzaga and Saint Mary's for a new book
Pack ten. In college basketball, we will see what happens,
all right, So we had to talk about realignment. Gladly
that's done. Now we moved to football, and so in
the Western College football from Week four, no bigger game
than USC and Michigan. So most if not all, of
you saw it, and it was really a remarkable game
in the sense that you know, for eighty eighty five
percent of the snaps when USC was on defense and
Michigan had the ball, USC's defense was smothering the Michigan offense.
Michigan threw for just thirty two yards. Alex Orgy could
not throw a pass more than five six yards down
the field. It was very apparent Michigan just had no
passing game, No Colston Lovelin, you know, did not have
its best tight end, its best pass catcher. So really,
throwing the ball was not really a consideration for Michigan.
And yet, and yet, despite being outplayed most of the day,
on most of the snaps, Michigan was able to bust
off three different runs that covered a total of one
hundred and fifty seven yards. The late game sixty three
yard run by Khalil Mullings puts Michigan in scoring position,
and the Wolverines were able to ram the ball in
on fourth and goal from the two. You know, it
wasn't fourth in inches, this was a two yard play
while just inside the two yard line, and Michigan is
just able to sledge hammer the ball off tackle to
the left and score. So it was a day in which,
you know, if you graded the game by snap, usc
won most snaps, but you don't get a prize, and
you don't get a victory for winning most snaps when
the few snaps that you don't win are huge, game
breaking plays. It was a really fascinating sports weekend because
there were other games that played out just like this,
Like the Saints held the Eagles to seven points in
the first fifty six minutes. The Saints played great defense
against the Eagles offense, but when the game was on
the line, all the chips were on the table, Saints
couldn't get it done. Eagles got it done. Same thing
with USC and Michigan. That USC for most of the
day looked like the better team and had the upper
hand with its defense against Michigan's offense, but on the
one drive that really really really counted late in the game,
Michigan got it done.
Speaker 2: USC did not.
Speaker 3: And that's why we're talking about USC being knocked off
and we're talking about a real big bounce back for
schirl Moore and that Michigan coaching staff and that Michigan team.
And so you don't get a prize for coming close,
and you don't get a prize for winning most snaps.
You have to do it when it really counts. And
so what do we make of this USC team? You know,
it was worth noting and this is also part of
our focus from week four. UCLA pushed LSU hard for
a half thirty five forty minutes in Baton Rouge, LSU
struggled with UCLA, And so maybe LSU isn't nearly as good,
not even close to what we thought the Tigers would be.
So when you consider that USC beat LSU in the
final minute, a result that looked great at the time,
a few weeks later, EH that that result doesn't look
nearly as good, nearly as impressive for USC, Whereas, on
the other hand, Michigan getting clobbered by Texas, it says
less about Michigan's weaknesses and it says more about, Oh,
Texas really does look like a national championship team. Texas
looks like a top tier group, a national title contender,
Like I would I would take Texas over Georgia in
Austin right now, you know, like like that they're going
to have that game in a few weeks. UH, Texas
looks the part. And so Michigan going up against Texas
got toughened up UH and learned a lot more from
its experience against Texas than what USC gained from UH
going up against LSU. LSU's offensive line not special, and
the LSU people that we read and talked to before
the USC LSU game. LSU an Lyst told us, this
offensive line is going to be something special. It's gonna
be one of the best offensive lines we've ever seen
at LSU. That offensive line has been mediocre. It's been average.
Nothing special about that LSU offensive line. So while USC's
defense is clearly better than last year under Alex Grinch,
there's no question about that. Danton Lynn and the other
guys on that staff, they definitely.
Speaker 2: Are doing a better job. We're not.
Speaker 3: We're not suddenly going to say they aren't. But the
extent to which USC had improved that was over sold,
that was overestimated, and LSU struggling against UCLA Michigan getting
blown out by Texas. We can all see which game
was more of a growth point for these two teams.
Michigan grew a lot more from its Texas experience than
USC grew from its LSU experience. We have to factor
that in and we're continuing to process those kinds of things.
You know, what, what does that week one result mean?
What does that week two result mean? Well, now that
we're getting in the week four, week five, we're beginning
to learn things, right, That's how every college football season goes.
That's part of the aftermath of USC Michigan. The other
thing we have to deal with here Lincoln Riley. People
are knocking him for throwing the ball late in the game.
You know what, there were over four minutes left. USC
needed a first down to win that game. The idea
that us he just should have dumped the ball three
times into the line and punted. That's not a winner's mentality.
That is not a winner's approach to a game. Now,
you know, I will say that Lincoln Riley calling two
shovel passes?
Speaker 2: What was that? You know?
Speaker 3: Why are you using two versions of this basically the
same play. Why are you not throwing the ball to
your receivers who have been getting open in the second
half against the Michigan secondary. Why aren't you just throwing
a pass to a receiver either in the flat or
like on a ten yard coral route. Why did you
Why did Lincoln Riley abandon that part of his playbook?
So we all agree Lincoln Riley's play calling was poor
on that drive with under five minutes left, But some
people think he just should have run the ball three times.
I'm gonna say, no, you need to get a first down.
You get a first down with like four minutes left,
and then you can run the ball three times, because
then you can bleed the clock all the way down
to two minutes. You make Michigan empty its timeouts, and
then you're in a position to end the game and
you can give the ball back to Michigan, but with
not nearly enough time left. As it was, Michigan got
the ball back with four minutes left. Now, of course,
if USC had run the ball at least one more time,
Michigan would have had one less time out, but still
there would have been nearly four minutes left. Michigan wouldn't
have had to run a Chinese fire drill on offense.
There still would have been time for Michigan to run
the ball.
Speaker 2: Probably would have.
Speaker 3: Had to throw a few short passes, but it wouldn't
have had to do a full on hurry up that
that doesn't happen until the final two minutes. So really
USC needed to get a first down because if you
get a first down, then you're not in a position
to give the ball back to Michigan with four minutes left,
which is what actually happened. You're in a position to
give the ball back to Michigan with like two and
a half two minutes left. There's a big difference there,
and coaches need to be in the mentality of we
need to get a first down. You can't think about
draining the clock and ending the game with five minutes left.
Because at USC got the ball with I think five
to eleven left in that game, You're not thinking about
ending the game. You're thinking about getting a first down.
That should be the mindset and what are our best
plays to get a first down? And then we have
the true leverage, then we have the overwhelming advantage. But
the idea that you should just be running the ball
three times in punting, no, that that there way too
much time to get involved in that. So to that extent,
that's not where Lincoln Riley failed. It was the lack
of a creative playbook and a smart series of plays.
That was where Lincoln Riley fell short. The other thing
that hasn't been talked about nearly enough with Lincoln Riley
against LSU in the opener, USC had to waste a
time out in the third quarter because a play wasn't
getting in. That happened again against Michigan, and if you've
listened to me over the past several years. Here on,
get off my pilon or you just follow me on Twitter.
You know this about me. You know, this is one
of my pet peeves with coaches, not just Lincoln Riley,
but any coach the time using a timeout in the
third quarter because a play doesn't get in it is
not worth it. You need that poker tip for the
end of the game. And the only exceptions, the only
exceptions in terms of you know, okay, it's all right
to use a timeout in the third quarter instead of
saving it for the end. The options are when it's
fourth and inches, you know, near the goal line, or
fourth in inches, you know, anywhere. You know you need
you have a few inches to make a first down,
and you really need to score on that drive. If
it's inches to go, then you can save the five
yard penalty. Then it becomes really really valuable. But if
it's like third and three, third and four, no, the
five yards are not worth that much. Like you're gonna
need to throw the ball whether it's third and four
or third and nine. Okay, you're gonna need to throw
the ball whether it's third and three or third and eight.
You do not use a time out if the play
clock is dripping down.
Speaker 2: The coaches need to realize that.
Speaker 3: Lincoln Riley needs to realize that he faltered, and he
faltered in a way that keeps happening. Happened against LSU,
happened against Michigan. It's happened several times over the course
of his USC tenure. Lincoln Riley not measuring up. Okay,
said a lot about USC and Michigan. We've said a
little bit about UCLA and LSU.
Speaker 2: Elsewhere.
Speaker 3: Washington easily handles Northwestern, no surprise there. Northwestern just doesn't
have much of an offense and Washington does have a
good defense. Washington's offense is still a question mark. You know,
that offense fell short against Washington State and the Apple Cup.
But Washington's defense looks pretty solid. But but it'll be
interesting to see now what Washington does on a Friday
night in New Jersey for that classic Big Ten matchup
Washington versus Rutgers. That one's going to be interesting. I
think that's gonna go right down to the wire.
Speaker 2: Would not be surprised at all if Rutgers pulls off
the win.
Speaker 1: There.
Speaker 3: Other Western teams and other conferences we have to look
at Utah. Utah goes into stillwater. It is not easy
to win in stillwater. And of course Utah with Cam Rising,
you know, being hurt, he's far from one hundred percent. Well,
the youths just put on their boots and they beat
Oklahoma State anyway. Kyle Whittingham just setting the gold standard
in terms of physicality, in terms of toughness, in terms
of stamina. That's just a winning program. I mean, Kyle
Winningham a coach that I was very critical of several
years ago. You know, we couldn't turn the corner at Utah.
It took a long time for him to really figure
it out. You know, for six five years ago he
wasn't really getting that program transforming win. Well, you know
in twenty twenty one he figured it out. He won
the Pac twelve, did it again the next year. Cam
Rising gets hurt. But you know you've seen Kyle Whittingham
teams win games, you know, in lunch pale fashion without
Cam Rising the past one and a half seasons. And
so there's just no end to the superlatives once you
give to Utah for you know, finding a way and
the youths just do not back down from a street fight.
It really is their best attribute as a program. So
they beat Mike Gundy in Stillwater, That's no easy thing.
Utah very very much the favorite in the Pac twelve,
and of course Utah's next to that. I say PAC
twelve Big twelve. Utah now hosts Arizona in a Big
twelve Pac twelve game on Saturday in Salt Lake City,
and if Utah wins that game, the youths will cement
themselves even more as the clear team to beat in
the new look Big twelve. So everything going well for
Utah under coach wit Colorado Baylor. You know, I'm not
gonna give Deon Sanders too much credit for a win
that he pulled out of his rear end on a
Hail Mary. But I will say this Dave Randa and Baylor,
the clock is ticking and I think we're gonna see
a coach firing in Waco. Dave Randa, you know, smart guy,
National champion defensive coordinator. He took Baylor to a Sugar
Bowl win, but it's just not working out and he's
just not making good decisions. Like he's done a lot
of good things in the past, but he did not
have his Baylor defense playing center field on the goal
line at the end of that Colorado game, and why,
I have no idea, but he didn't, and so you're
at Baylor defenders running backwards, scrambling trying to keep up
with Colorado receivers instead of just being on the goal
line playing center field where they should have been. Colorado
ties it up on a hail Mary at the very
end of the game, wins in overtime. So basically, Dave
Randa gift wrapped a win to Dion and the Buffs.
Colorado will take that gift. But now let's see if
Colorado can actually build off that victory and sustain anything.
Speaker 2: I am still very skeptical.
Speaker 3: And we don't want to give Colorado too much credit
until that program shows that it really is serious and
then it can really sustain some over the course of
a twelve game season. We have not seen that yet.
I mean, people fall in love with Travis Hunter, Shadur Sanders,
and those are very richly talented guys, but the larger
overall product at Colorado very incomplete, and we need to
see a lot more from that program as we move forward.
Arizona State falls at Texas Tech. So the Sun Devils
finally run into a loss. Do we know how good
the Sun Devils are. Let's keep in mind they beat
Mississippi State at home, and okay, you're beating an SEC
team early in the season early September seemed like a
really good win. But hey, we've seen Mississippi State lose
at home to Toledo and then to Florida, and Florida
is not very good the past few weeks. So maybe
ASU beating Wyoming and also Mississippi State was more of
a commentary on how bad Wyoming and Mississippi State are,
not necessary a reflection of how good Arizona State is.
So we'll see how the Sun Devils evolve and how
they respond to the lost Texas Tech. But I will
say this, regardless of how good you think Arizona State
is or isn't, if that program gets to a bowl
game this year, unquestioned success for Kenny Dillingham when he
already has three wins in his pockets, so yes, he
just needs three more wins, has it has two plus
months to get there. Arizona State is still on course
for a successful season, but fresh questions have emerged in
terms of just how good those Wyoming and Mississippi State
victories work elsewhere in terms of western college football. Uh
in the United States. Uh. You know, one thing that
has to be said is that, uh and I know
that Oregon and Oregon State played last weekend, but you know,
Oregon State getting blown out by Oregon does that game
mean that Oregon is fully in true back?
Speaker 2: Maybe? Maybe?
Speaker 3: I mean, there's no question that Oregon was better in
that game. But let's remember Oregon State shut out San
Diego State on the road before going before going up
against Oregon and getting hammered. So maybe Oregon thrashing Oregon
State is as much a commentary on Oregon State not
being all that good as opposed to, you know, Oregon
being transcendent. Now, if that having been said, Oregon State
bounces back from the Oregon loss and beats Purdue. This
invites the question just how bad is Purdue? You know,
Purdue lost by over fifty points to Notre Dame, and
Notre Dame is continuing to struggle with MAC programs. Notre
Dame struggled with Northern Illinois at home, didn't have a
great game at home against Miami of Ohio, and yet
that Notre Dame team, which really has labored against mid
American conference teams, that same Notre Dame team goes nuclear
against Purdue. Purdue loses to Oregon State. So does that
mean that Oregon States, you know, better than we thought,
or does it mean that Purdue is actually the worst
team in the Big Ten in terms of, you know, ranking.
Speaker 2: The Big Ten.
Speaker 3: I'm not going to go to all eighteen teams, but
through through week four what we've seen, it seems pretty
clear that Purdue and UCLA are the two worst teams
in the Big Ten conference. So a lot to chew
on as we continue to get into the midpoint of
the season, as we get into conference play and we
learn which teams are good, which teams aren't, and what
the value of a given result means, we're definitely diving
deeper into that process. So now a word from our sponsor.
So college football fans, we know that with the season
is starting again, and hey we already have almost a
month in the books, time is flying by. But we
know that you're looking for the best seats at the
most competitive prices. You want to make sure you take
advantage of ticket Smarter and their mobile app, Buying.
Speaker 2: College football tickets online requires trust.
Speaker 3: Ticket Smarter is partnered with more than one hundred universities
and twenty four conferences as their official ticket resale marketplace.
They've also partnered with ESPN Events as an official ticket
resale partner. With the best selection of NCAA football tickets,
Tickets Smarter make sure fans from all over the United
States experience the power and excitement of college football lives.
So purchase your tickets quickly, securely, and at the best
prices on the secondary market with the ticket Smarter mobile
app or at ticketsmarter dot com.
Speaker 2: And here's an.
Speaker 3: Offer for everyone listening on college grid on coast to coast.
Take five percent off your purchase of one hundred dollars
or more with our promo code grid Iron twenty two.
That's gridirn two to two, five percent off your order
of one hundred dollars or more and that code's not
a one timer, is for use throughout this college football season.
So check out the selections in pricing now with ticket
Smarter and remember our code Gridiron two to two. So
think smarter at ticket Smarter, go to ticketsmarter dot com
and the ticket Smarter mobile app for the best, most convenient, easy,
painless uh college football game ticket pricing experiences.
Speaker 2: So pick up your college football game tickets now.
Speaker 3: It's gonna be easy, it's gonna be fun, and it's
gonna be affordable with ticket Smarter and the Ticket Smarter
mobile app. So that does it for another edition of
College Gridiron, a coast to coast and this presentation of
Get Off My Pilon.
Speaker 2: This is Matt Zemak. We'll see you next week. Thanks
for listening.