Speaker 1: It's really.
Speaker 2: Okay. Hello everybody, good morning. This is Bulletproof Wednesdays with
Speaker 2: Dwayne or Diego from bulletproofpub dot com. And he's holding
Speaker 2: up Abraham Lincoln, just showing.
Speaker 1: Some books that I got my last book trip to Vancouver.
Speaker 2: Nice. I was just sitting there, dude, he looks pretty angry.
Speaker 1: Ten bucks nice, three volumes?
Speaker 2: Is it? Is it truth telling or is it propagandizing
Speaker 2: his his legacy?
Speaker 1: We'll find out.
Speaker 2: Yeah, all right, So I was looking at some interesting stuff.
Speaker 2: I want let me just go ahead and log in
Speaker 2: this real quick. You might hear some beeps if I
Speaker 2: get notifications, but I want to share this real quick.
Speaker 2: Uh that's the besos saying, oh yeah, okay, So here
Speaker 2: we go. Let me pull this up and let me
Speaker 2: just look and start off with the wonderful horrible things
Speaker 2: that are happening all around us to destroy our freedom
Speaker 2: even further and all that good stuff right So here
Speaker 2: it is. It says IMF calls for economy crushing carbon
Speaker 2: restrictions that dwarf COVID lockdowns. You are the carbon they
Speaker 2: want to reduce. Well obviously, and now, before I get
Speaker 2: into reading this, isn't it interesting that This falls right
Speaker 2: in line with what they were already seasoning the soup,
Speaker 2: salting the waters with that stupid you know, obviously scripted,
Speaker 2: obviously a non organic discussion that Joe Rogan and that
Speaker 2: demon Elon Musk were having about a carbon tax. Just
Speaker 2: put attacks on carbon. It's the smartest thing, man. That
Speaker 2: sounds like such a good idea, Fucking Joe Rogan. So
Speaker 2: this is it. This is it. They're speaking for the IMF.
Speaker 2: The IMF is the un The IMF owns you. It's
Speaker 2: the real government, and it's Rothschild all day long. Right,
Speaker 2: So there it is. Although COVID lockdowns led to supply
Speaker 2: chain instability, huge job bosses in stagflationary crisis, climate change
Speaker 2: propagandists argued that the event was actually a positive for
Speaker 2: the planet when it was revealed that emissions fill by
Speaker 2: five point four percent. Right, so they want us in
Speaker 2: perpetual lockdown means no more vehicles. Why do you think
Speaker 2: Elon and all this lithium shit is going on too?
Speaker 2: Who benefits from a carbon tax more than him? And
Speaker 2: he's just a figurehead of government, so it's not really him.
Speaker 1: No, he's a technocrat. We've already exposed him as a
Speaker 1: grandson of one of the pioneering technocrats, especially here in Canada,
Speaker 1: and he is spewing the word efficiency like crazy right now.
Speaker 1: So he's a progressive, you know, he's a he's a
Speaker 1: I mean, Walter Lepmann used the word technic. He said
Speaker 1: that when they wanted to create this great society, because
Speaker 1: it had grown so large and so complicated that the
Speaker 1: ordinary citizen couldn't understand it, they needed not the men
Speaker 1: of right and wrong to control it, but the technique
Speaker 1: that invented it. So you can see, this is the
Speaker 1: role that Musk is playing, and Rogan is playing the
Speaker 1: role of ath twenty first century Walter Leman steering society
Speaker 1: and the crazy ideas that at one point in his
Speaker 1: career he he you know, denied being an advocate for right. Yeah,
Speaker 1: urban tax and all of this shit.
Speaker 2: No, no, it's all about you know, you gained the
Speaker 2: trust for the people through a you know, a long
Speaker 2: history of at least you know, somewhat telling the truth
Speaker 2: or whatever, being on the side of reason and rationality.
Speaker 2: Then all of a sudden you just take the sharp
Speaker 2: left turn because you already have everybody following you. It's
Speaker 2: all the influenced stuff that they create, the people that
Speaker 2: it's the whole thing. If you are a known person
Speaker 2: in the scope of telling the truth or whatever, you know,
Speaker 2: you're not gonna be You're not gonna be a known
Speaker 2: person because the only people that are up on top
Speaker 2: that I can actually influence and steer the herd other
Speaker 2: people they want to be there. They're not gonna want
Speaker 2: other people to distract that herd. So you're gonna be
Speaker 2: what they call shadow band. You're gonna be this, you
Speaker 2: can be that, you can be the other thing. You're
Speaker 2: not gonna be known by a household name like these
Speaker 2: assholes like like Rugan, Jones and Peters, you know, And
Speaker 2: that's just that those are the people that are steering
Speaker 2: the herd. And the best thing to lie with that
Speaker 2: this is the truth. You start telling the truth and
Speaker 2: then you start throwing in your poison pills and sending
Speaker 2: people the wrong direction. High piper of apocalypse into the water.
Speaker 1: And so you know that this rise of the expert
Speaker 1: that we've shown as a necessary aspect or a pillar
Speaker 1: to progressivism. Right, So the three pillars of progressivism is preparedness, efficiency,
Speaker 1: and the opinion of the scientific expert.
Speaker 2: So and Elon's playing the role of the the Expert
Speaker 2: even though he doesn't know shit about ship yeah act.
Speaker 1: And so the point I want to make there is
Speaker 1: I lost my train of thought. Now, oh the Scientific Expert,
Speaker 1: and so what they're trying to do now and this
Speaker 1: is why I had the Crisis of the Expert series going,
Speaker 1: and we are going to finish that. It's just been
Speaker 1: postponed for the time being talking about anything with with
Speaker 1: with with Andy, Yeah, he just had no time. So
Speaker 1: I'm going to go out on my own and start
Speaker 1: doing this because this if I've still got all my
Speaker 1: posts that's sitting here for those shows, and I need
Speaker 1: people to understand that what they're doing right now on
Speaker 1: purpose is tearing down the Scientific Expert because they're going
Speaker 1: to bring in big brother AI. Right. We already see
Speaker 1: this movement through what are those little things what do
Speaker 1: they call him? The little speakers? They ask questions to you.
Speaker 2: Oh, like uh, the chat thing or yeah, yeah, like
Speaker 2: a series.
Speaker 3: Okay, so we.
Speaker 1: Already see those things entering our society long ago, over
Speaker 1: a decade.
Speaker 2: Now, well even even even beyond star on your vehicles.
Speaker 1: Sure, yeah, and so you can see that they are
Speaker 1: going to be the arbitrators of history. Everything's going down
Speaker 1: the rabbit hole, and these technocrats, these technics are going
Speaker 1: to steer us there. And they're at some point here,
Speaker 1: and it could be through this crisis that is coming,
Speaker 1: whatever it's going to be, in whatever shape and form,
Speaker 1: if it's going to be climate crisis and lockdowns because
Speaker 1: of that or virus or whatever it is.
Speaker 2: That they've determined, Well, they've already be pume this in
Speaker 2: their quote unquote computer model. So it's it's not as
Speaker 2: even as if they are working without the assistance of this,
Speaker 2: but they might project it as that, you know, they
Speaker 2: might they might purposely fail to our detriment and when
Speaker 2: they've already destroyed everything that we need to survive and
Speaker 2: then and then bring it in and when we're already
Speaker 2: you know, basically scraping for food and all the other shit.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and this is what they're going to say, is
Speaker 1: that humans inevitably are fallible. We make mistakes. So, you know, yes,
Speaker 1: we may. They may even come out and admit mistakes
Speaker 1: at COVID and other things that we've been pushing to
Speaker 1: into the narratives right trying to get people to understand
Speaker 1: they may start to admit these things to say. Then
Speaker 1: you know it's a dialectic. They can say, yes, we
Speaker 1: got into this horrible position. Who got us here? Well,
Speaker 1: we were listening to the scientific expert, and so we're
Speaker 1: going to have to start to rethink how our society
Speaker 1: is being governed so much by the scientific expert. You're
Speaker 1: going to see that they're going to come this direction.
Speaker 1: And so then the solution, the synthesis of all of
Speaker 1: this will be the introduction of AI. And you know,
Speaker 1: a machine, big brother, a little screen, little camera on
Speaker 1: your wall. This is where we're going.
Speaker 2: And oddly enough, who's got his fingers in that too?
Speaker 2: Neuro lace, neurolink right, like come on man, come on man, yeah,
Speaker 2: and this.
Speaker 1: Is all technology that is being designed. And then he's
Speaker 1: the front cardboard, cutout board all there's no doubt about it.
Speaker 1: What is he? He doesn't have a team there. This
Speaker 1: is dark black contracts that are the US government is
Speaker 1: participating in out of public purview to extend their imaginations
Speaker 1: to its furthest extent. That's really what's happening, right, And
Speaker 1: then their findings, like I would say Apple too, you know,
Speaker 1: the iPhone and the iPad and and all of these
Speaker 1: guys that we look to as the faces of those corporations,
Speaker 1: I think they're all just fronts.
Speaker 2: There's a picture of him holding but I think is
Speaker 2: like a fifty cal or something like that. He's holding
Speaker 2: it down at his waistside and he's firing it and
Speaker 2: he's wearing all black. That there's there's a there's a
Speaker 2: symbol there, but he's wearing all black and he's firing
Speaker 2: it off and it says freedom or some shit like
Speaker 2: that on that mustard. Yeah freedom, Yeah, he's what do
Speaker 2: you think the target is on the other side of
Speaker 2: that gun? Yeah, so ridiculous, mister carbon tax is all
Speaker 2: about freedom? Right that that's kind of a you know,
Speaker 2: your brain must have must have skis him there if
Speaker 2: you think that's the two can exist in the same body.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So this is a new form of government coming
Speaker 1: really right. Yeah, and it's us is going to be
Speaker 1: your welfare daddy. You know, even the fact that they
Speaker 1: they played like he can just buy MSNBC and buy whatever,
Speaker 1: you know. I remember less than a decade ago he
Speaker 1: was on mainstream pleading for money because he was broke
Speaker 1: because his cars and his research wasn't doing well. All
Speaker 1: of a sudden, he's the richest guy on the planet.
Speaker 2: And yeah, and he's pro j surprise, surprise. I wonder
Speaker 2: I wonder how he got got back on.
Speaker 1: His feet right right, probably like Churchill.
Speaker 2: Okay, So I'm gonna I'm gonna say a couple of
Speaker 2: things here. I just gotta find the thing that I
Speaker 2: saw about maybe I did. I just those are the
Speaker 2: take bullets. That's pretty fun. I'm looking through uh my
Speaker 2: Twitter or my Telegram right now and I'm trying to
Speaker 2: find I thought I saw something on here that had
Speaker 2: something about Musk on it, and I don't know, I
Speaker 2: don't see it now.
Speaker 1: But he tweeted the other day and used the word efficiency.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and we see with all the uh I don't
Speaker 2: see it now.
Speaker 1: The two to oh one, the scenario plannings that are
Speaker 1: going on at Johns Hopkins, they're always using efficiency and
Speaker 1: preparedness as keywords.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well that's all that's I mean, that's a technical
Speaker 2: termainive of itself, the whole efficiency thing. But the efficiency
Speaker 2: is devoid of you know, rational you know, consideration of
Speaker 2: human life and how that plays into it. Efficiency means,
Speaker 2: you know, if you're if you're also not doing your part.
Speaker 2: Then you're you're part of the problem. You're you're obsolete. Now, yeah,
Speaker 2: you're the what do they call it?
Speaker 4: Was it?
Speaker 5: Uh?
Speaker 6: Was it? Was it?
Speaker 2: George Bernard Shaw? Was that the guy.
Speaker 1: The extraordinary number of people of whom I'd like to kill? Yeah?
Speaker 1: That guy. Yeah, the tribunals, putting you in front of
Speaker 1: tribunals to justify your existence. These are the words that
Speaker 1: they use. And you know, Fabian society isn't just a
Speaker 1: more abundance society, you know, from the past. It's the
Speaker 1: British Labor Party today. You know, they steer British domestic
Speaker 1: and foreign policy, much like Council on Foreign Relations does
Speaker 1: for America.
Speaker 2: Oh, this is funny. So in the Economist, there's this
Speaker 2: thing that says, uh in this guy named shum Peter
Speaker 2: writes this, This says, the dangers of demonology. Hatred of
Speaker 2: bankers is one of the world's oldest and most dangerous prejudices. Really,
Speaker 2: is it?
Speaker 1: Yes, And that's our fault.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you know, you gotta we gotta support those bankers,
Speaker 2: I mean, those poor, those poor, poor bankers.
Speaker 1: Who have just bailed them not too long ago.
Speaker 2: It's none of it's logical. There you go, guys, there
Speaker 2: they are, there's there's and you know what, it's not
Speaker 2: even them, there's something behind that. But this is this
Speaker 2: is the face of it. This is just a shield,
Speaker 2: this rabbinical, smelly fucking penguin group here on the table,
Speaker 2: I think probably of course, of course, I'm sure there's
Speaker 2: not a single cabinet door open anywhere in there. That's
Speaker 2: what has to be koer cabinet door open. They all
Speaker 2: look like zeb Yeah, you all look, they also all
Speaker 2: look like zeb Zelinka. Right, that's not that's not gonna
Speaker 2: be a popular thing that most people. Was awesome though
Speaker 2: he was on the exactly.
Speaker 1: He's a controlled opposition, that guy. As far as I
Speaker 1: can in my own opinion from my research, I would.
Speaker 2: Say, yeah, and it's it's all part of the game.
Speaker 2: It's all part of the game to put these people
Speaker 2: in there and make them likable and then oh, I
Speaker 2: mean they're not all man. But it's it's not even that.
Speaker 2: It's like that word even of itself was a fabrication
Speaker 2: by this old ancient cult. You know, it's just another shield,
Speaker 2: it's just another thing. And then they the same people
Speaker 2: that were a cult that we had to destroy at
Speaker 2: one point, because there were a bunch of human sacrificing
Speaker 2: psychopaths decided to draft a couple actual religions, let's call
Speaker 2: it three religions, and then they sold it to us.
Speaker 2: And now we're letting them lead our our path into
Speaker 2: destruction because of a death cult and we're the target.
Speaker 2: But somehow, because you throw a guy named Jesus in there,
Speaker 2: and you throw a Mohammed in there, and you throw
Speaker 2: whatever the fuck else in there, all of a sudden,
Speaker 2: everybody's brain is tied into this thing and retarded now,
Speaker 2: so they're just going to walk your off the cliff. Yeah,
Speaker 2: and let's I've got a couple of things up here. Well,
Speaker 2: let's uh, let's pull up. You got on your side, right,
Speaker 2: you can do you can do stuff too.
Speaker 1: Right, sure? Yeah, absolutely, to pull.
Speaker 2: Up your your site real quick and just show people
Speaker 2: i've got. Let me pull up the Instagram. That's where
Speaker 2: everything I had.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there is There is nothing new at bulletproofpub dot
Speaker 1: com at the present moment, but there will be there.
Speaker 1: We'll be. We're just about done building at the farm.
Speaker 1: We're just doing a ten x twenty little shed that's
Speaker 1: going to be our seed starter and kind of our headquarters,
Speaker 1: a place that we can heat that's not our seat
Speaker 1: can So we're just about done there, and so I
Speaker 1: would say within we're inside of a week and I'm
Speaker 1: going to be going full time forensic history. I'm geeked,
Speaker 1: waiting in anticipation, looking forward to it very much. And
Speaker 1: so for anybody that hasn't familiarized themselves with my work,
Speaker 1: you can go to bp lletproofpub dot com. So stay
Speaker 1: calm and go to bulletproofpub dot com. This is one
Speaker 1: of the key things. Stay out of emotion, don't get
Speaker 1: don't bite down on the hook. Here we show how
Speaker 1: our society was created through the opinion of the expert. Hey,
Speaker 1: there's a ten part series there, and then right underneath
Speaker 1: it we have podcasts for each one in which Andy
Speaker 1: Rouse and I went through it. We go deeper into
Speaker 1: these topics and subjects, and then I have Missing Link
Speaker 1: interviews Forbidden Knowledge News with Chris Matthew and then Ballbusters
Speaker 1: with you Daniel. We're just about up to date, but
Speaker 1: there's so much information here for anybody that's unfamiliar with
Speaker 1: the progressive era and this epoch of time that we're
Speaker 1: exposing as sort of the introduction of the New World
Speaker 1: Order into America. You can come here this House of
Speaker 1: Truth and the Devil's Agent is a very important article
Speaker 1: to read. This is where they deliberately set out to
Speaker 1: flip the definition of liberalism, going from classic to neoliberal.
Speaker 1: And it's three US Supreme Court justices and the father
Speaker 1: of modern journalism all living together at a political slan
Speaker 1: one mile from the White House, doing gay things with
Speaker 1: each other Nineteenth Street. So you know, we've taken the
Speaker 1: research we've been going for fifteen years at least now,
Speaker 1: and we've kind of pushed through a lot of the gatekeeping,
Speaker 1: a lot of the areas that other researchers are hung
Speaker 1: up in, and we've gone through that passed it into
Speaker 1: the originators or the pioneers, or the creators of the
Speaker 1: our modern day social contract. Now, that is a fairly
Speaker 1: incredible statement to make, I realize that. But this is
Speaker 1: what we concluded when we realized just how influential the
Speaker 1: first Jewish US Supreme Court justice was on Western culture,
Speaker 1: Lewis D. Brandeis, we concluded was the maker of our
Speaker 1: modern day social contract. And that is going to be
Speaker 1: the title of my book when it gets out, Hopefully
Speaker 1: within the next twelve months we'll have something published and
Speaker 1: it's going to be called The Rise of the Expert.
Speaker 1: How a US Supreme Court justice made our modern day
Speaker 1: social contract. So I invite everybody to go there. We
Speaker 1: show how they infiltrate law with social science. We show
Speaker 1: philosophy that's behind law, that steers all of these jurists,
Speaker 1: these experts in law, these technics in law. They go
Speaker 1: back to Jeremy Bentham, utilitarianism and the greater good. Anybody
Speaker 1: hear that during COVID. We show in Part eight how
Speaker 1: the Association of American Universities is critical to creating this system,
Speaker 1: this network of experts. You know, Harvard founded in sixteen
Speaker 1: thirty six, William and Mary College sixteen ninety three, Yale
Speaker 1: seventeen oh one, Columbia seventeen fifty four, the Illuminati Phive Base,
Speaker 1: Beta Kappa and America seventeen seventy six. So this is
Speaker 1: kind of the approach that we take. We're going back
Speaker 1: through the forensic history. We're showing historical method so and
Speaker 1: the triangulation of historical artifacts and using primary secondary source
Speaker 1: material to find as close to the truth as we
Speaker 1: can possibly find.
Speaker 2: So when you're looking at that, do you. I mean,
Speaker 2: it would be probably if you don't already do this
Speaker 2: getting into the effect, so you're showing how it's leading up.
Speaker 2: But I think the final, you know, high moment right
Speaker 2: there smacking a freaking yeah exactly would be the trading
Speaker 2: with the Enemies Act nineteen thirty three wrapped into the
Speaker 2: Emergency powers and all the banking bankruptcy shit, because that
Speaker 2: was the culmination of all those other things. That was
Speaker 2: the final. Okay, you're now reclassified as a as a
Speaker 2: society and your enemies of the state, your enemy combatants
Speaker 2: is according to the government, because we need to seize
Speaker 2: the gold, and the only way we can do that
Speaker 2: is if we reclassify you.
Speaker 1: Yep. And I would say culmination is a great word
Speaker 1: to use there, Daniel, because Brandeis and Frankfurter are key
Speaker 1: advisors to FDR as well. They basically create FDR's brain
Speaker 1: trust through hiring all of these Harvard Law School up
Speaker 1: and coming the bright best and brightest students coming through
Speaker 1: Harvard Law School. Felix Frankfurter, who's not quite yet a
Speaker 1: US Supreme Court justice, puts time in at Harvard as
Speaker 1: a professor, and so he identifies all of the smartest ones.
Speaker 1: So we're talking Dean Atchison. This gets into the thirties
Speaker 1: and forties and the build up to the Second World War.
Speaker 1: You can clearly see that this is the same group,
Speaker 1: the same school of thought that steers FDR into finally
Speaker 1: culminating all of the ideas that they first initiated under
Speaker 1: Woodrow Wilson. But because there was three presidents that weren't
Speaker 1: willing to go the progressive way, they had to sort
Speaker 1: of sit back and wait their turn. And I would
Speaker 1: say that FDR was put in there deliberate least because
Speaker 1: they were already friends from as early back as nineteen fifteen.
Speaker 1: FDR was a Secretary of War and Walter Lippman was
Speaker 1: secretary to the to Newton Deal Baker, who was the
Speaker 1: Secretary of War. So they're intermingling zero degrees of separation.
Speaker 2: So and it's interesting because you know, first it's it
Speaker 2: started before the Federal Reserve Act actually went you know,
Speaker 2: the Allerdridge Plan in the Federal Reserve Act two sides
Speaker 2: of the same damn coin. Really, so you're going to
Speaker 2: get this regardless of which way they went with it.
Speaker 2: But once it was established them everything that they built
Speaker 2: the construct for following that. The way they forced and
Speaker 2: pushed this thing forward was to get us into a
Speaker 2: position to where we were responsible for the debt that
Speaker 2: this I MF slash Federal Reserve Act was going to
Speaker 2: was going to cause this country. So they had to
Speaker 2: tie us into the liability of whatever they were going
Speaker 2: to and of course, borrow, borrow, borrow, borrow debt, debt, debt, debt.
Speaker 2: But they had to, you know, because this this is
Speaker 2: a reverse economy. It's not based off of wealth. It's
Speaker 2: based off of debt. So everything that you do, if
Speaker 2: you borrow money, it's made out of thin air. And
Speaker 2: you know, somebody's got to be responsible. So it's a
Speaker 2: way to further put you in the dirt, enslave you.
Speaker 2: But they had to attach you a certain way. So
Speaker 2: what's the best way to do that. You steal all
Speaker 2: their true wealth out of the country and you make
Speaker 2: people themselves the collateral and as they're so it goes
Speaker 2: and I mean, the way do they do. They have
Speaker 2: the the birth certificate, They have the live certificate of
Speaker 2: live birth, which is a blood contract, which is an
Speaker 2: it's an unlawful contract because the baby doesn't understand the contract.
Speaker 2: But you know they tab the little blood on there
Speaker 2: and they tell you if you're a parent that if
Speaker 2: you try to skip that CPS will come get you
Speaker 2: for being an unfit parent because they're testing that little
Speaker 2: piece of blood that will drop of blood on paper
Speaker 2: for illnesses that fucking don't exist. Yeah, yeah, incredible, right, yeah,
Speaker 2: and back the IMF. And that's what we're talking about,
Speaker 2: the IMS speaking through the mouth of freaking uh what
Speaker 2: do you call it? Of Elon Musk and many other people,
Speaker 2: you know, the fake conversation with him and Joe. It's
Speaker 2: it's all bringing people the same place no matter where
Speaker 2: you look. Oh, the alternative media, Oh the people that
Speaker 2: are on our side, bullshit, they'll tell you some things
Speaker 2: to get you all worked up. So you're talking, and
Speaker 2: you know, Palllenteer can threat assess your ass and put
Speaker 2: you on a list of course, because what's coming on
Speaker 2: next you at the Christy Gnomes of the world. You
Speaker 2: got the freaking Tulsa Gabbards of the world, all coming
Speaker 2: in with power that they shouldn't have to fucking round
Speaker 2: people up for quote unquote anti Semitism. This is it's
Speaker 2: it's really going to get ugly and let me just
Speaker 2: go ahead and say this too, Trump's plan. Part of
Speaker 2: Trump's plan confirms the deportation strategy will include a national
Speaker 2: emergency declaration and military Do you really think that that's
Speaker 2: not tied to that DoD directive that just came out
Speaker 2: they said they can fire upon American citizens.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's one step at a time. They're getting there.
Speaker 1: Tulci Gabbert too, interestingly enough.
Speaker 2: A communist Marxist. Yeah, ten years.
Speaker 1: Ago, I'd go to the CFR membership list and she
Speaker 1: was on there. But just before she was brought into
Speaker 1: sort of the public interest, before anybody knew her, her
Speaker 1: name was scrubbed from the CFR membership list. Now, I
Speaker 1: wish I would have screenshot at that. I never did,
Speaker 1: and I went back and it's gone and there's no
Speaker 1: going back now unless say, you can find it somehow
Speaker 1: in the way back machine.
Speaker 2: But she is a that too. Isn't that funny that
Speaker 2: that thing crashed and got and got hacked quote unquote
Speaker 2: hacked right right at the right time when people will
Speaker 2: be doing this type of research.
Speaker 1: Wall her membership.
Speaker 2: No, the Internet archive, oh yeah, nothing that happened, And
Speaker 2: who knews what came back. Who knows, hey, unscrubbed.
Speaker 1: I've gone there in the last week and everything seems
Speaker 1: to be back there.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but when I go to the until you look
Speaker 2: for it, you know what I mean, right, And this
Speaker 2: is what I did change or just changed. Doesn't you
Speaker 2: have to be missing, could just be changed, because there's
Speaker 2: must I must be crazy because this.
Speaker 1: I was sure that I saw it there. This is
Speaker 1: why I go back to not just primary sources, but
Speaker 1: first printings, because some of these books are printed, you know,
Speaker 1: seventeen twenty times, so you need to get back to
Speaker 1: the first printing so that you can see where this
Speaker 1: all started with no perversion from authority.
Speaker 6: Right.
Speaker 2: And there's some books out there that you know, as
Speaker 2: as things progressed if the author was still alive, and
Speaker 2: they would just have updated some of the information, like
Speaker 2: Secrets of the Federal Reserve by Usless Mullens was first
Speaker 2: published in nineteen fifty two and more widely published in
Speaker 2: fifty four, So we're talking like a long time ago.
Speaker 2: But he's he's he had updated in the eighties, So
Speaker 2: I mean that that was different because he was still
Speaker 2: in control of that information that he was presenting.
Speaker 1: So yeah, I would say that's different than what I'm talking.
Speaker 2: About, right, absolutely, yeah, yeah, yeah, there is.
Speaker 1: This is protecting history and protecting themselves from complicit involvement,
Speaker 1: and so they alter things. Have seen this, they'll take
Speaker 1: quotes out. Actually, this is another book I just got.
Speaker 1: It might be my favorite possession right now.
Speaker 2: Public opinion. This was originally written Waltimately and.
Speaker 1: Then yeah, see the Pictures the World outside and the
Speaker 1: Pictures in our Head is the first chapter. So you
Speaker 1: can see it's a thinker. He's thinking, and he's thinking
Speaker 1: about the world. Yeah.
Speaker 2: That's and that's abstract thought, right, and that's what they're
Speaker 2: trying to that's what they're manipulating.
Speaker 1: There's your guy. There's the father of modern journalism right there.
Speaker 2: Okay, Yeah, it's important to the difference between abstract thought
Speaker 2: and tangential you know, you know, what do you call
Speaker 2: it a brainstorming or what have you? Creating the imagery
Speaker 2: and then this power suggestion so that you only see
Speaker 2: what you think you're supposed to see because you're expecting
Speaker 2: to see it, and that brings you into a whole
Speaker 2: false reality, a whole fabrication of what you and it
Speaker 2: just superimposes you know, they don't need to make different
Speaker 2: worlds because you can just see a different world.
Speaker 1: Great here, Daniel, you're a beauty, because that's exactly what
Speaker 1: Walter Lippman said. You wanted to create a pseudo environment.
Speaker 1: It says it in this book, pseudo environment that is
Speaker 1: close to the effective environm so that they can manipulate
Speaker 1: the effective environment.
Speaker 2: And that's the same thing, you know, that's the same
Speaker 2: thing that the Roman Catholic slash Jesuits are doing, right,
Speaker 2: That's that was what their their goal was still want
Speaker 2: to create a faults and then oh, man, I'm going
Speaker 2: right back to you hold a pale horse that was
Speaker 2: published in nineteen ninety one. He said that the Jesuit
Speaker 2: slash Popes and all this, they they one day wanted
Speaker 2: to be able to feed information into a computer system
Speaker 2: and have it tell them how to direct everything and
Speaker 2: be hands off completely. But they're the ones, of course
Speaker 2: who program it. So it's like silly that they say
Speaker 2: that shit.
Speaker 1: Well, when you read Hgul's New World Order and some
Speaker 1: of the other books of his, this is what he
Speaker 1: talks about. He's talking about the Internet in the thirties,
Speaker 1: and so this book was originally public opinion originally published
Speaker 1: in nineteen twenty two.
Speaker 2: And do we really thought that that stuff was not
Speaker 2: already in existence at one time in a different cataclysmic era,
Speaker 2: or maybe even maybe our brains are just a little
Speaker 2: bit skewed because of fake history. I mean, this stuff
Speaker 2: was just reintroduced. I don't think it was invented because
Speaker 2: they were such wise thinkers that they were able to
Speaker 2: create the ideas and then make them happen. I think
Speaker 2: it's more like it was already in existence. They were
Speaker 2: just gonna roll it out, kind of like you're Nintendo,
Speaker 2: then you get a Super Nintendo, and then you get
Speaker 2: the n sixty four. You know, it's just a progression.
Speaker 2: PS one, PS two, PS three, PS four, PS five.
Speaker 1: I go back to Sega Genesis.
Speaker 2: Man, yeah, that's a good time.
Speaker 1: In the early nineties.
Speaker 2: MHL it was oh n NHLPA hockey, yeah, yeah, a sports. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that was good times. And the best way to play
Speaker 2: NBA jams was on the Sega Genesis because it went faster.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I spent a lot of time when I was
Speaker 1: sixteen seventeen playing video games and then I just stopped.
Speaker 1: All of my friends continued doing it. They still do
Speaker 1: it today. They've got their little headphones on. They'll be
Speaker 1: talking to each other in other cities. I'm I don't
Speaker 1: have any time for that ship.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I used to play a lot tonight.
Speaker 1: Here's another one we found. This is also very important.
Speaker 1: Who's who's there? Pardon?
Speaker 6: So? Is this? Uh?
Speaker 2: Is this an objective explanation or is it a.
Speaker 1: What do you call it? Is it a He's an
Speaker 1: official bio condemnation? Oh?
Speaker 2: Okay, it is.
Speaker 1: It's Uh. This is actually a really good book. It
Speaker 1: it goes into Brandi's being the architect of the New
Speaker 1: Freedom and the creation of the Federal Reserve BacT. But
Speaker 1: Arthur S. Link is an official Wilson biographer.
Speaker 2: I had the Atari twenty six hundred two. Man, so
Speaker 2: I was.
Speaker 1: I was right, So same book, Woodrow Wilson in the
Speaker 1: progressive era, just in an Eastern press and nice. Now
Speaker 1: we're getting impressive, right, we've got gold whatever on the Yeah,
Speaker 1: we've got our own little silk bookmark. It comes with
Speaker 1: its own But these, you know, this is how we
Speaker 1: fight the new world order. We have to grab these.
Speaker 1: I mean we were just at the Cologna book sale
Speaker 1: friends of the Library, and man, you wouldn't believe the
Speaker 1: lineup to get in there, and we were half an
Speaker 1: hour early, so you can see that people are and
Speaker 1: we've been going to this book sale for years and
Speaker 1: it was the largest I'd ever seen. And what was
Speaker 1: funny is that they've got all the boxes stacked there,
Speaker 1: and they've got them labeled. There's twelve fifteen labels maybe fiction,
Speaker 1: science fiction, history, social sciences, and the ones that I'm
Speaker 1: interested in, of course are the social sciences and the history.
Speaker 1: But those were the last books to go boxes to
Speaker 1: be unpacked because everybody else was reading like Daniel Christie
Speaker 1: and just you know, bull books. And so I'm over
Speaker 1: there basically by myself in the history section, picking and
Speaker 1: choosing and grob and and you know, my wife came
Speaker 1: up to me last year or the year before, and
Speaker 1: she walked up to me. She's like, Hey, is this important?
Speaker 2: Aldus Suxley The Doors of Perception.
Speaker 1: Nice, it's a double Doors of Perception, Heaven and the hell.
Speaker 1: I'm like, holy crap, just at a book sale. I
Speaker 1: paid two bucks for that. Hey, we picked me.
Speaker 2: Nice.
Speaker 1: You know, there's no price on it. This is from
Speaker 1: the book sale. Two bucks. And so now this is
Speaker 1: not a first printing. But this is the words of
Speaker 1: Aldus Huxley. The doors of perception, you know, are very
Speaker 1: important in the sixties countercultures.
Speaker 2: Right right, and then and then in the movie they
Speaker 2: say it's because of William Blake's poem. But that's William
Speaker 2: Biggs poem. Is why Elvius Huxley named his book exactly exactly.
Speaker 1: So here's an oldest Huxley I found. You see the
Speaker 1: title do.
Speaker 2: What you oh, do what thou wilt? Oh my goodness
Speaker 2: something right.
Speaker 1: That's all. I don't even know if this book is
Speaker 1: in his bibliography. I paid fifty bucks for it, oh way.
Speaker 1: But when you've come across something like that, you have
Speaker 1: to have it, do you know? Oldest Huxley basically quoting Crawley,
Speaker 1: and so it says.
Speaker 2: Here by the way his parents were, it says, do
Speaker 2: what you will.
Speaker 1: This world's a fiction and is made up of contradiction
Speaker 1: William Blake.
Speaker 2: Yep, so there you go, and this is this night
Speaker 2: it too, and this is why people have to understand
Speaker 2: this whole ENTI yeah, nineteen twenty nine, right, this whole
Speaker 2: thing that you know, we look at as the Roman
Speaker 2: Catholic Church or the Christianity of this stuff. There are amazing,
Speaker 2: wonderful elements to it, but it is controlled and it
Speaker 2: was created by your enemy, and that's something that has
Speaker 2: to be understood. And it wasn't just oh it's the
Speaker 2: Jews in the toe, No, it's like the Romans. Like
Speaker 2: this was a can sort of concerned, an effort to
Speaker 2: control people. And when you when you see it for that,
Speaker 2: like the Rosicrucians were deliberately creating this what would come
Speaker 2: later with the eugenics movement and this whole progressive thing.
Speaker 2: This is this is them, like you see, uh, Francis Bacon, Rosicrucion.
Speaker 2: What's he doing? He's editing the freaking KGV. Right, So
Speaker 2: where does the word you come from? Oh, it's come
Speaker 2: from this guy. You know, where does the word gentiles from?
Speaker 2: Switch from nations to gentile? It's oh, from it's from
Speaker 2: this guy.
Speaker 1: Really?
Speaker 2: Yeah, who is that again, Francis Bacon.
Speaker 1: Francis Bacon, Okay, that's cool. Send me some links on
Speaker 1: that if you have anything. I'd love to see that.
Speaker 1: And I think it should be said here too that
Speaker 1: what what I've discovered or you know, what I've seen
Speaker 1: through my research here is that this progressivism is really
Speaker 1: just progress. Right, So we're talking manifest destiny, we're talking enlightenment,
Speaker 1: scientific revolution. We're going back into the sixteen hundreds. This
Speaker 1: is really where we find this expert. The belief in
Speaker 1: the opinion of the scientific expert is coming out of
Speaker 1: We've traced it all the way back to the seventeen
Speaker 1: hundreds and the enlightened absolutists that were all these census
Speaker 1: to collect data and statistics.
Speaker 2: That they romanticize, They that they teach the kids, that
Speaker 2: they still want to teach the kids. Those are all
Speaker 2: their heydays. It's there. It's their highlights. It's not for
Speaker 2: mankind by any means. It's their highlights of when they
Speaker 2: were brainstorming and freely doing so because of whatever else
Speaker 2: previous to that allowed them the freedom to do so.
Speaker 2: Let's say, oh, I don't know, a renaissance in Paris
Speaker 2: after World War One, right, you know that type of shit.
Speaker 2: We're all of a sudden, here we go, well, we
Speaker 2: have psychiatry now and then that one. Won't that be
Speaker 2: wonderful for this Bolshevik Soviet government that's to follow? How nice?
Speaker 7: You know?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Uh so, this this old traditional idea of scientific
Speaker 1: man versus God. We're all familiar with this, right. This
Speaker 1: is really this is the idea that comes out of
Speaker 1: the scientific revolution that the man, that man can now
Speaker 1: measure quantity, quantitatively his setting and his surroundings. So he's
Speaker 1: going to now go around and measure everything and determine
Speaker 1: things for himself.
Speaker 2: And whatever that's removing doesn't exist. That's the other way.
Speaker 2: This is how spirit This is.
Speaker 1: How the Jesuits come in and parallel with the whole
Speaker 1: progressive movement, because you know, they're trying to bring everybody
Speaker 1: back into the flock. This is the counter reformation. So
Speaker 1: you can see paralleling there, and and reasons why and
Speaker 1: and the means may be different, but the ends aren't.
Speaker 1: It's it's total societal control, right to be able to
Speaker 1: control everything.
Speaker 2: So it's all taking the same direction, regardless of what
Speaker 2: face they put on and what mask they're wearing. So
Speaker 2: it's it's all about the same end goal, which is
Speaker 2: control and destruction of you whenever they see seem fit
Speaker 2: or deem fit to do so. You know, and if
Speaker 2: they control your minds, they don't necessarily have to control
Speaker 2: your breathing, but if in the event that you become
Speaker 2: you know a burden. Well, they've already got you, and
Speaker 2: you've already trust their system, and you're already still go
Speaker 2: line up for their shots and take yourself out through
Speaker 2: you know, state assisted suicide basically with an in judge. Right,
Speaker 2: And look what's going on in Canada, man like forty
Speaker 2: seven thousand people so far, and they're going after people
Speaker 2: that have what they call it COVID vaccine syndrome. So
Speaker 2: they created the problem. Now they're gonna euthanize people and
Speaker 2: offer the euthanization of people. If you're too old, you
Speaker 2: stub your toe, you have a lisp, you know, hey,
Speaker 2: you really want to keep living, right, I mean we
Speaker 2: could just and they're done the kids kids, and let
Speaker 2: them make that decision.
Speaker 1: And actually, Daniel, we were sitting here the other day
Speaker 1: watching a hockey game and we'll get the commercials, and
Speaker 1: it was a commercial about high school kids having heart
Speaker 1: attacks and dropping dead right there in like school.
Speaker 2: Right, because that's normal, that's been with us. We just
Speaker 2: never talked about it before.
Speaker 1: Of course, I was like, wow, look at that, their
Speaker 1: way ahead of it. Never in my life was you know,
Speaker 1: children or teenagers, adolescents, juveniles having heart attacks and dying
Speaker 1: at hot at school. That was just not part of
Speaker 1: life people.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and I saw something. I saw a statistic, which
Speaker 2: you know how statistics are, but it's okay if you're
Speaker 2: just counting. And in the last fifty years they said
Speaker 2: something like one thy two hundred and something people died
Speaker 2: from on the field or whatever, from art attacks. And
Speaker 2: then in the last two years it was nearly three thousand.
Speaker 2: So it took fifty years to get twelve hundred. It
Speaker 2: took two years to get three thousand.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and you can see that they're trying to lower
Speaker 1: life expectancy. I would say that's the point where people
Speaker 1: will start to say, wow, sixty years old, that's pretty good,
Speaker 1: pretty old. Well, when you think about it back in
Speaker 1: the day and nobody was living into their sixties and seventies.
Speaker 2: You don't want to be on dialysis to you, all right?
Speaker 1: So can you see what I've got something on my
Speaker 1: screen here?
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm looking at it. TESSAs whooping cough.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Faith and quick test leads to epidemic that wasn't.
Speaker 1: This is a New York Times article, So they're admitting
Speaker 1: that the two thousand and six or two thousand and
Speaker 1: four to two thousand and six, whooping cough. The protussis
Speaker 1: epidemic was all made out of fear, and they talk
Speaker 1: about the PCR test as being one of the res
Speaker 1: and at the end of this article, so in Canada,
Speaker 1: I can't share articles, so I've screenshotted everything, but take
Speaker 1: this title. And I know in New York Times is
Speaker 1: they just put up a paywall in front of you.
Speaker 1: But I'm able to get these and screenshot them without
Speaker 1: paying anything. And I'm not sure how I did that.
Speaker 1: I think I went back to the archive for the
Speaker 1: Wayback Machine and I went down the entire story and screenshoted.
Speaker 1: So in the end of this article in two thousand
Speaker 1: and six, they ask themselves how are they going to
Speaker 1: fare if there was a real pandemic, a real one
Speaker 1: with the PCR being untrustworthy. So that's the story that
Speaker 1: comes out of here.
Speaker 2: Test. When you test for a bunch of stuff and
Speaker 2: then you never tested before, you're going to find things
Speaker 2: because guess what, Number one, the results are completely misleading.
Speaker 2: These things have never been verified to even exist. You
Speaker 2: don't know what you're actually looking for, and you don't
Speaker 2: know how to even read your PCR test because it's
Speaker 2: any real information. Your body has these things floating around
Speaker 2: in them. Anyway, whether or not they become a problem
Speaker 2: to you is based on your your internal environment and
Speaker 2: how healthy you are exact just having them. And and
Speaker 2: then this idea that they know what the strand of
Speaker 2: a virus is and they don't even know. They can't
Speaker 2: they can't even show you an isolated None of this
Speaker 2: makes any sense, So they can they can tell you anything.
Speaker 2: And of course if they want to scare people, there's
Speaker 2: gonna be ship tons of what they call false positives,
Speaker 2: which is in and of itself, is also a misdirection
Speaker 2: because false positive for fucking what?
Speaker 1: Yes, exactly, it's so deeply layered. It's like the layers
Speaker 1: of an onion. That why what does Churchill say? It's
Speaker 1: an enigma wrapped in a whatever. That's what this?
Speaker 2: Do you remember when when when in Trump's campaign or
Speaker 2: his first his first round, he went to John Hopkins
Speaker 2: because he was short of breath or something like that,
Speaker 2: and they said that he was he tested positive a
Speaker 2: PCR tests for COVID, right, like, this is all bullshit again.
Speaker 2: And and then what he was he was promoting abdemkin,
Speaker 2: which we find out it is awesome, that good for you,
Speaker 2: and you know this all this other stuff. But then
Speaker 2: and then what and then what he says on a
Speaker 2: show recently that he got I don't know how recently
Speaker 2: was maybe it was a couple of years ago, but
Speaker 2: he said that he got the shot and he got
Speaker 2: a booster. Yeah, right, because if he says it, then
Speaker 2: all his people will think it's okay.
Speaker 1: To quecharts are gonna run out and get it.
Speaker 2: This is the safe one, right, or even just the
Speaker 2: red hatters, you know.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so fiasco of the nineteen seventy six swine flu affair.
Speaker 1: This is in the seventies.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we went a lot of this stuff on the
Speaker 2: show too, that Take Your Medicine series. I went through
Speaker 2: all of this with the.
Speaker 1: Did you kick good?
Speaker 2: No, this is good though, this is good that you're
Speaker 2: thinking as well.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so we're showing that through historical artifacts here, the BBC,
Speaker 1: New York Times, mainstream media in general. I could show
Speaker 1: you a sixty minutes expose a on the nineteen seventy
Speaker 1: six swine flu in which they called it a hoax. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you can see that what was involved in right when
Speaker 1: you read this the articles, you see that the same
Speaker 1: problems that caused this caused COVID a rush, emotional rush,
Speaker 1: reaction to things that aren't proven, right, like you.
Speaker 2: Say, massive parallel paralysis and death for and you know,
Speaker 2: this is the funny thing because ever since pastor, this
Speaker 2: is what they do. Oh, the virus is too strong.
Speaker 2: We didn't get there on time. It's not ever the
Speaker 2: anti virals, the anti biotics, or the injections that killed
Speaker 2: the person. No, no, no, no, it can't be the
Speaker 2: intervention that killed the person who was perfectly healthy before then. No,
Speaker 2: it must be. It has to be very you know,
Speaker 2: there's just more validation that this bullshit lie of a
Speaker 2: virus is true, because look he's dead now. Yeah, it's
Speaker 2: it's so circular thought.
Speaker 6: You know.
Speaker 1: Have you ever seen the video of Krrie Molus when
Speaker 1: they're when he explains how the PCR test can be misused.
Speaker 2: He says it, Yeah, he says, I don't know, it's
Speaker 2: if it's really a misuse, it's more of whether or
Speaker 2: not the data means anything, right, And so have you
Speaker 2: gone over that? Yeah, ok, you can do it.
Speaker 1: I would like to actually just play it here if
Speaker 1: I can find it.
Speaker 2: Because I think I think carry also is a little
Speaker 2: bit of a well he was a little bit of
Speaker 2: a miss maybe not intentional, but like that also is
Speaker 2: misleading because it's also again assuming that any one of
Speaker 2: their claims of virus is even a thing right, regardless
Speaker 2: of HIV and AIDS have anything to do with one another.
Speaker 2: What is either one of those? What are they? Are
Speaker 2: they a condition of the the intervention? Are they poor
Speaker 2: lifestyle and a bunch of drugs and gate and gay lifestyle?
Speaker 6: Like?
Speaker 2: What what is it that it's actually causing to in
Speaker 2: quote illness? Because the sure hell hasn't been proven that
Speaker 2: it's been a virus, because unicorns don't bite your rifers.
Speaker 2: There you go.
Speaker 1: So I'm just going to play this well, let it roll.
Speaker 1: It's just under four minutes. But here's the inventor of
Speaker 1: the PCR test, you know, stating just how it can
Speaker 1: be misused, misinterpreted.
Speaker 4: Harry, how do they misuse PCR to estimate all these
Speaker 4: so supposed free viral r nas that may or may
Speaker 4: not be there?
Speaker 8: I think misused PCR is not quite I don't think
Speaker 8: you can miss use the results.
Speaker 1: I would disagree with that.
Speaker 3: If you if you, if you can say if they
Speaker 3: were for.
Speaker 1: A second don't find this virus in you.
Speaker 2: Any use of it is a misuse because it's it's
Speaker 2: a tool in the hands of people don't understand what
Speaker 2: the hell they're doing with it, and it's based off
Speaker 2: a faulty logic in the first place, that a DNA
Speaker 2: doesn't is static, and that genetics are static, or that
Speaker 2: they even know what the hell they're They've never completed
Speaker 2: a full protein strain in the first place to even
Speaker 2: understand this all computer model. So what are you looking for.
Speaker 2: You're looking for something that you made up and if
Speaker 2: it matches close enough your liking, then you're going to
Speaker 2: say it's that. Then then you're exponentially increases so that
Speaker 2: it looks like there's more of it there so that
Speaker 2: you can actually take a reading on it.
Speaker 1: And that's it from top to bottom right. And that's
Speaker 1: inductive reasoning rather than deductive. You're not following the truth.
Speaker 1: You're trying to make things manifest into reality. That way,
Speaker 1: you have a hypothesis and a conclusion and you're going
Speaker 1: to try to steer the data and information to support that,
Speaker 1: whereas deductive you're going to ask the who, what, why, where, when,
Speaker 1: and go where the truth leaves you, so you can
Speaker 1: see right there, it's a faulty premise at its basis.
Speaker 1: Plus everything you just said about testing, about you know,
Speaker 1: confirming that there's viruses or viruses at all, All of
Speaker 1: this is multi layers of pseudoscience.
Speaker 2: They want to skip to Z when they haven't even
Speaker 2: improven A Yeah, I mean, that's that's the way it.
Speaker 1: Is, Yeah, because Z opens the door to all of
Speaker 1: the social reform that they.
Speaker 2: Want right all right in the pc R.
Speaker 3: If you do it well, you can find almost anything
Speaker 3: in anybody there you go.
Speaker 7: So it's making you believe in the sort of boddest
Speaker 7: notion that everything is contained and everything else right, I mean,
Speaker 7: because if you can model, have amplify.
Speaker 3: One single molecule up to something that you can really.
Speaker 8: Measure, which PCR can do, then there's just very few
Speaker 8: molecules that you don't have at least one single one
Speaker 8: of them, and you're going right, So that could be
Speaker 8: thought of as a misuse of it, just to claim
Speaker 8: that it's meaning there you go.
Speaker 3: The real misuse of it is you don't need to
Speaker 3: test for HIV. You don't need to test for the
Speaker 3: other ten thousand record viruses that are unmade also in
Speaker 3: the sub.
Speaker 7: HIV generally is gonna have almost anything that you can
Speaker 7: test for because they have definitely the HIV's are fairly
Speaker 7: rare virus.
Speaker 8: There's only one million of us out of two hundred
Speaker 8: and fifty three hundred million people in America that have
Speaker 8: that virus.
Speaker 1: So you have to get around the fact that thing.
Speaker 7: You have to really be paying a lot of attention
Speaker 7: to people that do have it and pay an only
Speaker 7: attention to them and get a pretty good chance to
Speaker 7: get it.
Speaker 1: That way. It's hard to get it, but it cured it.
Speaker 7: There's a good chance you've also got a lot of
Speaker 7: other ones because you've been in the in the market
Speaker 7: where you've been, it's been possible for you to get
Speaker 7: a lot of it's to test for that one and
Speaker 7: say that has any special meaning is what I think
Speaker 7: is the problem not that PCR has been misused.
Speaker 2: It's like, can you pause it for a second.
Speaker 3: It's not as it's realized.
Speaker 2: And it's also it's also assuming that this is something
Speaker 2: that comes from the exterior and not from the interior. Right,
Speaker 2: your body is responding to an environmental change or a
Speaker 2: signal or a trigger from either some sort of poison
Speaker 2: or a lack of nutrition, some sort of mineral deficiency
Speaker 2: or something, so it has to readjust itself. This is
Speaker 2: where the microsigmon thing comes in, by bes Schamp, and
Speaker 2: this is why it's so important. And then they say,
Speaker 2: this is something you correct from the inside as well.
Speaker 2: It's not something that can go when you take a
Speaker 2: freaking shot that goes past your gut and indirectly into
Speaker 2: your bloodstream where it hasn't been filtered out or anything.
Speaker 2: That's anytime you do that with anything, you're poisoning yourself
Speaker 2: and you make your shocking your system and then oh
Speaker 2: my god, something happened. Surprise, surprise.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I had no idea. You were so racist. It's really.
Speaker 3: It would be something about nature and about what's there.
Speaker 7: But it allows you to take a very miniscule amount
Speaker 7: of anything and make it measurable and then talk about
Speaker 7: it in the meetings and stuff like.
Speaker 3: It is important. See that that's not a misuse, that's
Speaker 3: just sort of a misinterpretation.
Speaker 1: There you go, Now that's all. Ultimately, the point is
Speaker 1: that he's admitting right there that you can take anything
Speaker 1: as minuscules whatever and blow it up and make it
Speaker 1: into something meaningful. That you can sit around the boardroom
Speaker 1: tables and talk about. Now, so that's exactly what they
Speaker 1: did during.
Speaker 2: COVID, blown shit out of proportion. And what are you
Speaker 2: talking about anyway, because it's all based on this assumption
Speaker 2: in the first place that this thing is a thing
Speaker 2: in the first place, right, And you see that if
Speaker 2: it looks similar to that thing that we computer model,
Speaker 2: then we must it must be the thing, right.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: And the way that this pastor's lies were deliberate. He's
Speaker 2: one of the one of the one of the Fraternal
Speaker 2: Order members, and the amount of absolute fraud that he,
Speaker 2: you know, carried out and was praised for, has forever changed.
Speaker 2: This the scope and landscape of our what we consider health,
Speaker 2: which isn't health. It's a it's a death system. It's
Speaker 2: not a health system.
Speaker 1: It's actually quite breathtaking to see how far away from
Speaker 1: reality we have been moved when you consider, you know,
Speaker 1: how valid the modern medical industry is today, how valid
Speaker 1: in the minds of a lot of people, mainstream media
Speaker 1: is the scientific experts. Really at the height of his
Speaker 1: career and ready to be torn down, That's what I
Speaker 1: can see. They're placing him up there every chance that
Speaker 1: they can get so that they can tear him down,
Speaker 1: much like they did with and then you know, lay
Speaker 1: the blame on him like they did with Woodrow Wilson,
Speaker 1: like they did with Oliver Wendell Holmes. I mean, these
Speaker 1: guys are all complicit in their own degrees too.
Speaker 2: And they even look atucha point and everybody's like, oh,
Speaker 2: we got to do this. It's like, nothing's ever going
Speaker 2: to happen to that guy, Andy. It's just they play
Speaker 2: the same formula all the time. Like remember with Adam
Speaker 2: Schiff and Trump, like that whole drama, that hold, that
Speaker 2: whole side shoe soap opera. Nothing was ever going to
Speaker 2: happen to Adam Schiff. His ancestor was Jacob Schiff. Yeah, okay,
Speaker 2: he's direct Froth's child agent. Nobody can touch them. He
Speaker 2: could eat or kill a baby in public and nothing
Speaker 2: would happen to him.
Speaker 1: Yeah. To think that he's an idiot is wrong. They
Speaker 1: are very intelligent. I mean how many times in your
Speaker 1: life as the government uh pleaded ignorance or you know,
Speaker 1: said oh we just didn't know. I mean, it happens
Speaker 1: all the time.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Oh, And I just wanted to let people know when
Speaker 2: I went to the ones. Yeah, when I went to
Speaker 2: sign up to vote for doctor Monso and doctor Glinnen
Speaker 2: on the Maha thing Kennedy's involved in. I have been
Speaker 2: getting inundated by by begging by Kennedy to pay for
Speaker 2: things because he's not wealthy, right right for his campaign
Speaker 2: that failed for presidency, he has he's quote unquote five
Speaker 2: point five million in debt and he wants he wants
Speaker 2: us to pay for that. Yes, because that's what we
Speaker 2: need to do. He wants us to pay for you.
Speaker 2: And just got another message for him begging and crying
Speaker 2: about and the other one the other thing was he
Speaker 2: does the Secret Service has they've denied him secret service?
Speaker 2: Uh what do you call it? A security attachment? So
Speaker 2: he wants to get his own private security and he
Speaker 2: wants us to pay for that as well. This guy
Speaker 2: is such a grifter, he's such a piece of crap.
Speaker 1: Wow.
Speaker 2: And then sitting there hes on a fucking you know plane,
Speaker 2: then billionaires.
Speaker 1: Well, he's already admitted to being a Zionist. So that's
Speaker 1: all you really need to know. I mean, everything else
Speaker 1: is just a waste of time, and so we need
Speaker 1: to stay focused and becoming victims of the spectacle.
Speaker 2: And Uncle John. Uncle John in sixty two he signed
Speaker 2: into into effect something that opened up the doors for
Speaker 2: this whole vaccine bullshit in the first place.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean the New Frontier is progressive. That was
Speaker 1: his campaign platform. So we can see progressivism is permeated
Speaker 1: through the entire twentieth century, all the way to build
Speaker 1: back better. Harris's were never going back, Hillary Clinton's moving
Speaker 1: forward together. It's all progressive, no matter what side. So
Speaker 1: this is the answer to a whole bunch of everybody's questions,
Speaker 1: like how did the mainstream media get corrupted? How did
Speaker 1: the two party system get the way it is, How
Speaker 1: did the definition of liberalism? How did liberalism change so
Speaker 1: much to now include radical social activism, because that's not really,
Speaker 1: at least in the definition of classic liberalism. That isn't
Speaker 1: what we're supposed to be doing. And I would remind
Speaker 1: people that we are called and I don't know where
Speaker 1: we get this title from, but we are humans being
Speaker 1: I think that this idea that we're always moving forward
Speaker 1: or we have to have a briefcase in our hand.
Speaker 1: You know, this economics, this administrative man, it's all a myth.
Speaker 1: It's all created like an evolution, like the fact that
Speaker 1: they we believe innately that we're always moving forward and
Speaker 1: always improving our lives. That's not necessarily true. I think
Speaker 1: that it's one of those blinds that progressivism puts on us,
Speaker 1: because I think that if everybody was ever to ask me,
Speaker 1: where would you want to go back to if you could,
Speaker 1: I would say around that era, turn of the nineteenth
Speaker 1: or twentieth century. You know a lot of things we
Speaker 1: had right, and so you know, we could go back
Speaker 1: to more grarian lifestyle or you know, self supportive. Each
Speaker 1: of us could live on an acre of land and
Speaker 1: support ourselves. But also we can incorporate an entrepreneurial spirit
Speaker 1: within our life and our philosophy of life too. We
Speaker 1: don't have to be you know, capitalistic exploitive. We can
Speaker 1: like what my wife and I are doing now. We've
Speaker 1: created a farm and we found a niche, and people
Speaker 1: appreciate that we grow food with no chemicals and pesticides,
Speaker 1: and they finally get to taste what real food tastes.
Speaker 6: Like.
Speaker 1: This is what we need to be doing, and this
Speaker 1: is really what our society should have been, except we've
Speaker 1: had one hundred years of tangent just totally off on misorientation.
Speaker 1: You know, this is what they did. They steered our ship.
Speaker 1: They realized that they had to remove the moorings from
Speaker 1: our ship in order to turn that ship to the
Speaker 1: horizon in the direction that they wanted. And then they've
Speaker 1: been steering ever since, using social science and applied science
Speaker 1: feedback loop to keep steering us.
Speaker 2: So yeah, I'm not you know, here's the thing what
Speaker 2: they consider capitalism and what actually they're doing. And you
Speaker 2: know they say that communism is anti capitalist, it's capitalistic communism,
Speaker 2: and that's what they use in China, that's what it's
Speaker 2: always been tied into Wall Street. Well, it's all like
Speaker 2: bullshit screaming at the thing that keeps them afloat and
Speaker 2: true capitalism. And when you're talking about people in small business,
Speaker 2: there's nothing wrong with that. There's you know, the quality
Speaker 2: of product is what should drive whether or not you
Speaker 2: make it or break it, your quality of service and
Speaker 2: all that stuff. So it's I'm not against that. I
Speaker 2: think what happens is there's a lot of liberal bullshit
Speaker 2: that's intended to try to attack the very things that
Speaker 2: keep you afloat, and that's kind of like the self
Speaker 2: destructive your breakdown your own thing, even like build a wall,
Speaker 2: you know, like that that chant and and it's like, well,
Speaker 2: walls both and I said this back in twenty seventeen eighteen.
Speaker 2: Walls work both ways if they want to keep you in.
Speaker 2: And then Ron Paul said that's at some point too,
Speaker 2: he said, you know, walls work both ways. And an
Speaker 2: economic crisis, when you try to want to leave with
Speaker 2: their assets and they don't let you, there's a problem there.
Speaker 2: They wouldn't let they wouldn't let stephoud Verse stop and
Speaker 2: come into the America from Toronto area because as he
Speaker 2: wasn't shot up with the shots right, right right. So
Speaker 2: those walls that have a double meaning, right, they work
Speaker 2: both ways.
Speaker 1: And I would say that is a great message to
Speaker 1: in relation to progressivism in that they say all the
Speaker 1: nice words, they promise all of the safe things, but
Speaker 1: here we are one hundred years later. One hundred years ago,
Speaker 1: they said they were going to ameliorate the poor and needy,
Speaker 1: they were going to remove poverty from society. They were
Speaker 1: going to do a ton of things they promised, and
Speaker 1: none of them have worked out, and most of them
Speaker 1: are way worse. Now. You know, we've extended the debt clock.
Speaker 1: We started this conversation about debt and the use of
Speaker 1: debt to control they extended the debt clock. They had
Speaker 1: to add zeros to it, which tells me that there's
Speaker 1: no intent on ever changing that. You know, this is
Speaker 1: really how they subjugated England and basically the world at
Speaker 1: this point through centralized governments.
Speaker 2: You know, it's funny, is UH. Soon after Fukushima, they
Speaker 2: increased the minimum or maximum threshold of safe for UH
Speaker 2: radiation in California, right right, And it was like a
Speaker 2: thousand times greater than what it used to be. So
Speaker 2: now it's normal again, and it's like and then they
Speaker 2: start telling us at the same time that they're going
Speaker 2: to start radiating our food because of bacteria in the
Speaker 2: meats and stuff like that in the grains. So now
Speaker 2: now if people walk in and they do the reading
Speaker 2: with their little their little the little measurement thing that
Speaker 2: they spent two hundred bucks on, oh well, of course
Speaker 2: because they are radiated on purpose. Of course, it's not
Speaker 2: because there's actually poisoning happening. But so when people do
Speaker 2: get sick from that type of shit, the thyroid starts messing.
Speaker 2: Whatever the case may be. No it's it's it's definitely
Speaker 2: because there's a virus out there, and certainly not because
Speaker 2: they've been lying and completely forgetting about the whole you know,
Speaker 2: global poisoning event that occurred. That's a giant dirty bomb
Speaker 2: that's still self feeding itself. Yeah right, And who was
Speaker 2: who was doing who was doing a security there? Masade,
Speaker 2: I'm sure there was no no babitate there at all. Right,
Speaker 2: Oh and humble Painter. Yeah, my stepfather uh brought into
Speaker 2: our home a natural dru pong set too, with the
Speaker 2: little with the little dials. We had one of those.
Speaker 2: I think it actually had its own TV if I
Speaker 2: want a little time thing.
Speaker 1: But uh yeah, yeah, Well my stepdad built his own
Speaker 1: computer when I was like whatever, I was fourteen, twelve, thirteen,
Speaker 1: somewhere in there. And so we were one of the
Speaker 1: first ever to play that Atari game where you have
Speaker 1: the paddles on either side and the ball goes back
Speaker 1: and forth.
Speaker 2: Yeah that's pong.
Speaker 1: Yeah yeah, yeah, right, okay, so we I remember playing
Speaker 1: that before anybody had ever really.
Speaker 2: Seen it before Space Taxi on C. Sixty four. It
Speaker 2: was one of my favorite commerce sixty four Comma.
Speaker 1: It was sixty four man that brings me back throughly eighties, right, yeah,
Speaker 1: something late eighties somewhere in there. Yeah, I remember Clico
Speaker 1: Vision and that would have been eighty two eighty three
Speaker 1: for sure. I remember going over to our neighbors and
Speaker 1: playing Collecovision.
Speaker 2: And thousands on that thing, giant giant knob. You hold
Speaker 2: the hands, there's a knob on top. There's like a
Speaker 2: freaking pad that looks like a phone, like all the
Speaker 2: numbers on it, like there's so many numbers, And I'm
Speaker 2: sure Cliico is probably superior to Atari, but you know,
Speaker 2: it's all about the war, right, So then Colclad just
Speaker 2: started making games for Atari. And then you see Nintendo
Speaker 2: popping up in there. If you look at some of
Speaker 2: the old Atarian games, they have Nintendo as the creator
Speaker 2: of them. It's pretty interesting, cool, and nobody wants to
Speaker 2: take credit for that fucking et game. They said that
Speaker 2: they like filled Filled Land, Filled.
Speaker 1: Uh with really? Yeah, because nobody wanted it.
Speaker 2: So hyped up and it was such a piece of
Speaker 2: craft game. But I have a copy of it, so
Speaker 2: did everybody else.
Speaker 1: Right, Right, do you still have the old console? Could
Speaker 1: you still play?
Speaker 2: Maybe at my mom's house, maybe in New York? I
Speaker 2: mean we had two, three or four of them, like
Speaker 2: my uncle had one, so they kind of got collected.
Speaker 2: But we never had the seventy six hundred, only had
Speaker 2: the twenty six hundred. Yeah, so let's see he said
Speaker 2: he's not needed a nine vote battery. Oh man, what
Speaker 2: else are we going with here? Let me see there
Speaker 2: it is blaspheming in the air.
Speaker 1: Hey, what what ever came of Joel Salad and becoming
Speaker 1: I don't know, cobody in the Trump administration.
Speaker 2: We started seeing what he's actually filling it with, which
Speaker 2: is trash. I don't think those people in there would
Speaker 2: have any ability to exist coexists unless they were going
Speaker 2: to completely go against everything that they believe in.
Speaker 1: Right, this is one person I'm very interested in seeing
Speaker 1: what he does. Joel Salatin is, as far as I'm concerned,
Speaker 1: more and more honest people you'll ever see. He's out
Speaker 1: there doing things for a long time. We owe a
Speaker 1: lot to him. And the fact that you know, in
Speaker 1: the days right after Trump was winning that election, they
Speaker 1: were talking about Joel Salatin is some sort of health
Speaker 1: minister or something. I was actually.
Speaker 2: Like that, because you know, maybe they'd want to have
Speaker 2: a little bit of a a hue of legitimacy, so
Speaker 2: it's not so overburdened with this death to American whitie Zionism.
Speaker 2: Maybe they will cut a couple of real people in there,
Speaker 2: but what their powers will be would be pretty limited.
Speaker 2: I'm sure.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And he may not know all of that, And
Speaker 1: I would say I would suggest that he doesn't know
Speaker 1: Zionism and how they've controlled American government. He would be
Speaker 1: going in there kind of like a wide eyed baby,
Speaker 1: And so I would if I were able to give
Speaker 1: him advice, I'd say, don't do it. Stick to what
Speaker 1: you've been doing, don't get involved in politics, keep doing
Speaker 1: your far more effective Joel doing what you do. Yeah,
Speaker 1: don't sign people hard to grow, don't put yourself in
Speaker 1: a position where you can be exploited.
Speaker 2: And this should also concern people because regardless, if you
Speaker 2: know it's a one to one, you know this is
Speaker 2: like shortcut to thinking right, like, he doesn't need the
Speaker 2: same exact people to do this, But the fact that
Speaker 2: these are this is happening, and Kushner and all this
Speaker 2: other stuff, what do you think is going to happen next?
Speaker 2: Do we not like what has Wald Health Organization been
Speaker 2: hinting and throwing out there, what have they been taking
Speaker 2: as liberties as what they're going to implement the next time,
Speaker 2: and how there's not going to be any way for
Speaker 2: any country that's a member stay of the UN to
Speaker 2: argue with what they decide to decree. And where does
Speaker 2: that leave us when there's already been a warp speed
Speaker 2: with this asshole?
Speaker 6: You know?
Speaker 2: President elect Johnald Trump has nominated these COVID injection advocates
Speaker 2: for the following positions. Doctor Oz, doctor Oz is a
Speaker 2: dual citizen for the Administrator of Medicare Biggest comeback on
Speaker 2: the planet and Medicaid. But do all these people ignore
Speaker 2: the fact that they, their suggestions, and their influence have
Speaker 2: killed many, many millions of people.
Speaker 1: Daniel, Did he really hire Tulca Gabbert for Director of
Speaker 1: National Intelligence?
Speaker 2: Yes? Yes, so there it is. It's all going now,
Speaker 2: And doctor Jeannette niece Waite for Surgeon General. Trump, He's
Speaker 2: not doing this. It's it's his controllers that doing this.
Speaker 2: It's the ads, it's the it's the experts, it's the IMF.
Speaker 2: The IMF is stacking the deck. And it's not because
Speaker 2: they couldn't have done this with her without Trump. It's
Speaker 2: just that this is the time they're deciding the fate
Speaker 2: of America, and they're doing it this way on this
Speaker 2: on the outside, because they every person is their person.
Speaker 2: It doesn't matter who it is. Every person is their person.
Speaker 1: I'll be right back.
Speaker 2: Let's play this a little. Let's see if I can
Speaker 2: get it the uh that might not? Allot me? Hold on, Oh,
Speaker 2: it looks like it went to it. I'm not sure
Speaker 2: if you'll be able to hear it though. Let's let
Speaker 2: me just take it down and bring it back up.
Speaker 2: I'll see. Let's take a trip on the moon. Will
Speaker 2: they speak no word of truth? But we don't understand anyway. Ah,
Speaker 2: that was a holiday by the Weezer in case people
Speaker 2: were wondering what the hell was just doing there.
Speaker 1: The other concern I have is the the bio weapon
Speaker 1: that was released on us the vaccines. That needs to
Speaker 1: be communicated effectively in the new administration, that something bad happened.
Speaker 2: Well, hold on one second. The other thing that led
Speaker 2: us to get to that by a weapon that was
Speaker 2: released upon the marinkind is whatever the hell they poison
Speaker 2: people to get them sick enough to feel or believe
Speaker 2: that those symptoms somehow had something to do with this
Speaker 2: brand new virus. So, yes, malnutrition is a thing. Yes,
Speaker 2: the constant bombardment of radiation could also cause that, including
Speaker 2: five G towers and all that stuff, and they're putting
Speaker 2: up an offul out of those, so those can can
Speaker 2: signal your micro assignment to start acting differently to make
Speaker 2: you have symptoms, and they mean, They tell you what
Speaker 2: you should be expecting and what those symptoms actually mean.
Speaker 2: They give you a name, they give you a label,
Speaker 2: and then I all a sudden, you freak out and
Speaker 2: you go do exactly what they ask you to do.
Speaker 2: But it should be understood that there was some other
Speaker 2: poisoning event as well prior to first they give you
Speaker 2: the little poison that might only kill a couple of people,
Speaker 2: get your running scared into their arms where they hit
Speaker 2: you straight up in the arm with the actual poison
Speaker 2: that they want you to have.
Speaker 1: What was interesting, anyway my own life was that both
Speaker 1: my wife and I got really really sick in October
Speaker 1: of twenty nineteen. We were up chopping wood, and.
Speaker 2: You didn't you didn't imagine that. So the vassals out
Speaker 2: there in the quote unquote truth movement to pretend that like,
Speaker 2: no is the power suggestion? Are fucking idiots, you know
Speaker 2: what I mean, they're liars. What would be a uh well,
Speaker 2: they were saying that people who got sick didn't really
Speaker 2: get sick, like people like how we said that, and
Speaker 2: and hal Coffin They're like, yeah, no, that wasn't anything
Speaker 2: like they were just old. It was just stupid people.
Speaker 1: No, it was the sickest. It was the sickest both
Speaker 1: Megan and I ever were in our lives. Was there?
Speaker 1: What was?
Speaker 2: What was going on? Was there a hard hard time breathing?
Speaker 9: What was?
Speaker 2: Because I can tell you five g Yeah, micro like
Speaker 2: millimeter waves they actually cause in the atmosphere, the actual
Speaker 2: gases bond into double bodied n O, which is cyanide.
Speaker 2: So if they're shooting that stuff around a certain area,
Speaker 2: they can affect a certain area of people from getting
Speaker 2: quote unquote sick, and then they blame each other for
Speaker 2: having contagion when it's not that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I thought I was going to die. Honestly. It
Speaker 1: was just awful. And that was before COVID. So when
Speaker 1: COVID hit, we were like, oh interesting, because we just
Speaker 1: we were we had just gotten healthy from being sick,
Speaker 1: and then we had the same symptoms that they were
Speaker 1: identifying as COVID. So I don't know what to tell you.
Speaker 1: There was floating around prior.
Speaker 2: To Right, there's some kind of poison that first that
Speaker 2: they that they season season the waters with first. I
Speaker 2: mean they see the season the the environment with first
Speaker 2: to get people, and they already know what that's going
Speaker 2: to cause. So that that's that's the new virus symptoms
Speaker 2: and oh flu, Well what the hell is the flu?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Right, what are what are we believing about that lie
Speaker 2: about the flu? Like, no, it's something that's poisoning you,
Speaker 2: and it's causing people with we know either they have
Speaker 2: a weaker immune system already, which isn't even a real thing.
Speaker 2: It's just your internal environment is lacking something because you
Speaker 2: can build it back up, but you know, installing points.
Speaker 2: And this is what they do all the time. Poison poison, poison, poison, poison.
Speaker 2: You know, it's funny that in what they call the
Speaker 2: Dark Ages of the Middle Ages, so many people died
Speaker 2: of so many things, and it all can be attributed
Speaker 2: to a certain group of people poisoning the fucking wells.
Speaker 1: So here's a book somebody, a friend gave me a
Speaker 1: long time ago gut and psychology syndrome mm hm. And
Speaker 1: you can see that they're claiming that all of these
Speaker 1: things come from uh our diets essentially the lack up
Speaker 1: right exactly our gas intestinal But.
Speaker 2: This is also at the same time a cover up
Speaker 2: for vaccine poisoning too, because all those things can also
Speaker 2: be associated with being shot up with an injection. Yeah,
Speaker 2: including that they.
Speaker 1: Say autism, but it includes a lot more things.
Speaker 2: I'll say too. There's all kinds of stuff going on there.
Speaker 1: So Natasha Campbell, if anybody's not wanting to know what
Speaker 1: that book is, go find it. Great information in there.
Speaker 2: Two let's go ahead and a watch a little bit
Speaker 2: one of this.
Speaker 9: Would like to see justice for the millions murdered by
Speaker 9: the nanotech infected shots, but don't hold your breath. If approved,
Speaker 9: our next cabinet will include as administrator for Medicare and
Speaker 9: Medicaid doctor Oz, a television personality who pushed implantable chips,
Speaker 9: transgenderism for kids, and to push the deadly COVID vaccines repeatedly.
Speaker 2: Should people have their children vaccinated? Definitely, Yes, definitely yes.
Speaker 1: As a doctor, even I'm in awe of the incredible
Speaker 1: advances made in sort of a COVID nineteen vaccine.
Speaker 2: Look at his face, Look at those long ass ears.
Speaker 2: That long ass knows he is asht Nazi all day long.
Speaker 9: Or in the history of mankind has a vaccine been
Speaker 9: developed at the speed. But just because we're moving fast
Speaker 9: doesn't mean we're moving unsafely, not cutting.
Speaker 1: Liar right, just because we're moving super fast doesn't mean
Speaker 1: that we're not cutting corners. It's like, that's such bullshit.
Speaker 1: That is progressivism right there.
Speaker 2: Yep, quarters I trust the science. And this sign he
Speaker 2: trusts the science. What science would that be? The malt
Speaker 2: speci artest, the fake idea of virus in the first place.
Speaker 2: What do we talk about here? What are we actually preventing?
Speaker 2: What are we trying to prevent? Because nobody's even to
Speaker 2: put their finger on what we're trying to prevent with
Speaker 2: this shot that's going to kill you.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And when they say things like the science is settled, dude,
Speaker 1: that is like a magic wand this is the spell.
Speaker 1: These are the spells.
Speaker 2: M hm. And to note that he's a duly doesn't
Speaker 2: help his cause.
Speaker 1: K behind these COVID nineteen vaccines. Again, you see witches
Speaker 1: around a cauldron and they'll be saying all kinds of
Speaker 1: words and trying to conjure up the debt or whatever
Speaker 1: they're doing. Safe and effective. Trust the science, that is
Speaker 1: what those are.
Speaker 2: Yeah, those are monsters too.
Speaker 1: Yep, yep, yep, and you should too.
Speaker 3: What can you do after you get the COVID vaccine?
Speaker 2: Not much. If you're dead, pray to God. I think
Speaker 2: as well, you can have your you can have your
Speaker 2: plan and your ship and your vacation. You can you
Speaker 2: can be a human again if you get the vaccine.
Speaker 2: All you have to do is get the vaccine and
Speaker 2: then you're allowed to be in society again. That's a
Speaker 2: fucking piece of shit.
Speaker 9: If approved, Marco Rubio will be our new Secretary of State.
Speaker 9: He pushed the vaccine and boasted debt. Operation Warp speed
Speaker 9: Atti Sephardic was a huge success.
Speaker 1: You can say a lot of things about the way
Speaker 1: America responded to the pandemic in the early days of
Speaker 1: the one thing that's without dispute is that no one
Speaker 1: has done vaccines better than the United States. I mean,
Speaker 1: look around the world.
Speaker 2: Well that is what you mean by that, you know,
Speaker 2: push them best, because I think that's what that actually
Speaker 2: implies that they push them back. So done, vaccines better?
Speaker 2: What does that mean?
Speaker 1: Right?
Speaker 2: Got more people convinced to take it?
Speaker 1: And he's invoking company's positivism. We're positive that were the greatest.
Speaker 1: I mean, who better to put at the head of
Speaker 1: all of this right now than Trump? He's always telling
Speaker 1: on everybody that he's the greatest at everything.
Speaker 2: Right, Well, he's the father of the vaccine still, by
Speaker 2: the way, he's.
Speaker 1: Like a father of neo progressivism almost now. And look
Speaker 1: here and look at the fact that right now, basically,
Speaker 1: if you're at this point, if you're twelve years of
Speaker 1: age or older and you want a vaccine, you can
Speaker 1: get one.
Speaker 2: Oh that's nice. So and he fails to mention against
Speaker 2: your parental consent too, because they're going to override that
Speaker 2: because you are actually a member. You are a property
Speaker 2: of the state, not your parents.
Speaker 9: Yeah, if approved, Tulsi Gabber will be the director of
Speaker 9: National Intelligence.
Speaker 2: And she has a nice streak. We're just about to
Speaker 2: say that with the hair exactly, And what's she doing
Speaker 2: with that hand there? What's she doing that? That's when
Speaker 2: when the people do that thing and you see you
Speaker 2: even see Beyonce with with the microphone through it, So
Speaker 2: it's more of a sexual thing with her because of
Speaker 2: microphone through through the vagina thing.
Speaker 6: Right.
Speaker 2: But this this is actually how they cast or they
Speaker 2: project a spell onto their audience. That's that's what that
Speaker 2: symbol is in in witchcraft, right, It's when they do
Speaker 2: this thing. Right, So that's that's not unintentional. She helped
Speaker 2: all the old go ahead.
Speaker 1: No wedding ring, well don't she Maybe it is that
Speaker 1: I just can't see it. Is she married? She must be?
Speaker 2: That's the right hand, I think, isn't it.
Speaker 6: Yeah?
Speaker 1: But the other hand, I see maybe there's a ring there?
Speaker 2: Oh right here?
Speaker 1: Yeah, I thought at first there was no ring. She's
Speaker 1: kind of like perfect prototype.
Speaker 5: Older people vaccinated early on three weeks ago, I urge
Speaker 5: our leaders to put those over sixty five years of
Speaker 5: age at the front of the line for vaccinations, alongside
Speaker 5: healthcare workers and first responders.
Speaker 2: Right, make everybody who actually responds to crisis as ill
Speaker 2: as everybody else could call there.
Speaker 5: Now today, I'm happy to report to the Department of
Speaker 5: Health and Human Services has now agreed to this strategy.
Speaker 1: So if you or your loved ones are sixty five or.
Speaker 5: Over, you're fucked you will now be able to get
Speaker 5: the vaccine if the leaders of your state comply with
Speaker 5: these recommendations.
Speaker 9: If approved, doctor Jeanette Neshawatt will be our new surgeon general.
Speaker 2: She but only because she ate the other person.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he's also.
Speaker 9: Pushing the masks, the deadly vaccines and the censorship.
Speaker 6: First of all, vaccines saved lives. And I am so excited, and.
Speaker 9: I think, and I commend faith.
Speaker 2: I really want somebody who's hundred and fifty pounds overweight
Speaker 2: to tell me about health.
Speaker 1: And how do you know that? How do you know
Speaker 1: that vaccines saved lives?
Speaker 2: Because the World Health Organization told her so, right, CDC said,
Speaker 2: so measles.
Speaker 1: You know, measles was almost completely eradicated by the time
Speaker 1: the measles vaccine came out. I know you know that,
Speaker 1: And I know a lot of people do know that
Speaker 1: it's important not to forget that.
Speaker 2: And and and measles wasn't is a condition of of
Speaker 2: a of a nutrient deficiency too, right, and what is.
Speaker 1: But being in direct contact with fecies And so this
Speaker 1: is why they a large Yeah, because they they they
Speaker 1: improved sanitation and you know, sewer systems and all of
Speaker 1: these things made our lives a little cleaner. I think
Speaker 1: that that's really probably the primary reason why some of
Speaker 1: these things, you know, basically it disappeared.
Speaker 6: Yeah, let's see what she is to say, Facebook and
Speaker 6: Mark Zuckerberg for taking action.
Speaker 2: And oh, thank you Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook for taking
Speaker 2: action against this anti vaccine oh what they call it
Speaker 2: vaccine hesitancy. You're creating hesitancy with your misinformation of truth.
Speaker 6: And I hope and pray that other social media platforms
Speaker 6: will follow.
Speaker 2: Suit and do the same. So censorship of free speech
Speaker 2: really hopes that censorship of free speech and letting and
Speaker 2: not letting the truth come out about a very dangerous
Speaker 2: evil plot against mankind. Let's hope that everybody suppresses.
Speaker 1: That YEP company's positivism. Again, Wow, no time for questioning.
Speaker 1: We know the correct way to go. Thank you very much.
Speaker 1: The future will be perfect.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Facebook to coma vaccine misinformation and she's celebrating. Oh,
Speaker 2: by the way, that guy, that guy Zuckerberg, who looks
Speaker 2: an awful lot like a Rothschild, almost a lot like
Speaker 2: the young Nathan Rothschild. He's got a three hundred million
Speaker 2: dollars super yacht and a thirty million dollar one.
Speaker 1: He could solve a lot of poverty by selling that boat,
Speaker 1: but he doesn't.
Speaker 2: It's not even so much that it's like, what are
Speaker 2: these multimillion errors doing that they know that international waters
Speaker 2: might be the best place for them soon.
Speaker 1: You know what I mean.
Speaker 6: If you are fully vaccinated, then it is safe to
Speaker 6: go outside to go hiking.
Speaker 2: But only if you're fully vaccinated with a ship ton
Speaker 2: of poison, then you're okay hiking.
Speaker 6: To enjoy outdoor dining, to be around other people who
Speaker 6: are unvaccinated without a mask. Now, that is, if you
Speaker 6: are fully vaccinated. It's also important that if you start
Speaker 6: your first dose, you get your second dose.
Speaker 2: Because they've never ever proven contagion period and they're still
Speaker 2: going on with this fucking Pasturian fraudulent see through two
Speaker 2: dimensional bullshit over one hundred years later.
Speaker 1: So they've never been able to prove that viruses passed
Speaker 1: from one person to another.
Speaker 2: No, and it's very specific to tissue, and it's not
Speaker 2: even a virus. Thing's a and then it's not.
Speaker 1: Even a virus. Get into these multi layers of lies.
Speaker 1: If you're going to try to wake up an army person,
Speaker 1: you have to first start, you know, you almost have
Speaker 1: to walk them through the wake up process that we
Speaker 1: went through. First, you have to understand it by this definition.
Speaker 1: Then you have to understand it by this definition.
Speaker 2: Well, that's why I went back right back to the
Speaker 2: the odd set of a pastor and Ben Schamp who
Speaker 2: was telling the world and showing of the proof that
Speaker 2: this is not how this this is not even the
Speaker 2: right proper function and method of what illness is and
Speaker 2: where it originates or or any of that fermentation, I
Speaker 2: mean that stuff. None of that is anything that pastor said.
Speaker 2: And so the solution can't be correct if the if
Speaker 2: they're seeing the problem incorrectly or deliberately incorrectly. Sure, and
Speaker 2: it's this opposite secures, opposites. Bullshit is the oppositional method.
Speaker 2: It's the it's the war model. So you're going and
Speaker 2: you're attacking your biology rather than trying to, you know,
Speaker 2: strengthen it during a symptem. You're you're you're suppressing and
Speaker 2: destroying it with a poison, with a drug, with a shot,
Speaker 2: So you're making it worse. You're waking it further in
Speaker 2: a time where it needs to be strengthened. Nothing good
Speaker 2: can come from that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, what do you think of the picture that was
Speaker 1: put out with RFK and them all sitting on an
Speaker 1: airplane eating McDonald's.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, yeah, I mentioned that earlier. It's it's just
Speaker 2: one of the single ship. It's just billionaires eating McDonald's
Speaker 2: because this is the slop that you know that they're
Speaker 2: that the public should have because we're a bunch of
Speaker 2: fucking goy or a bunch of these.
Speaker 1: Do you think that of them had a single bite
Speaker 1: of any of it?
Speaker 2: Probably, I don't know who knows. The trumpet is McDonald's
Speaker 2: and ship at the White House was was a common theme.
Speaker 2: Of course they're getting paid by corporate but you know,
Speaker 2: then you've got to look at what the golden arches
Speaker 2: really are and how that plays into their whole freaking
Speaker 2: cult too, or or the simple fact that over ninety
Speaker 2: nine billion served and there's been a lot of rumor
Speaker 2: of the nanotech slash weird shit in the nuggets and
Speaker 2: sure potential that there's you know, baby parts baby sells
Speaker 2: in them. So they're feeding you back your boarded fetuses
Speaker 2: right now.
Speaker 1: That's getting out there in conspiracy theory. But I mean
Speaker 1: Donalds is government subsidized and it is a large holder
Speaker 1: of realty right like it. It possesses a lot of property. McDonald's.
Speaker 1: I think that the distribution of food is its secondary priority,
Speaker 1: almost like Walmart.
Speaker 2: Maybe it's Masonic.
Speaker 1: It's Masonic. Yeah, sure, well it wasn't he a freemason? Right,
Speaker 1: same with Tim Horton. Tim Horton here in Canada was
Speaker 1: a Freemason.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and uh and the same kind of thing too.
Speaker 1: Tim Horton's was taken over by somebody else like McDonald's was,
Speaker 1: and steered in a certain direction. Now most Canadians, you know,
Speaker 1: are still addicted to Tim Horton's, but it's very obvious
Speaker 1: that it's interiorated. It's no longer sort of a piece
Speaker 1: of Canadiana like it was considered when I was in
Speaker 1: my twenties. Do you still have Harvey's out there falling apart? Yeah?
Speaker 1: We got some Rby's.
Speaker 2: No, not Arby's, Harvey's.
Speaker 1: There's another Harvey. Yeah, we've got a Harvey somewhere here.
Speaker 1: I think, ye, why couldn't make it?
Speaker 4: No?
Speaker 1: I did.
Speaker 2: One of the girls I was dating a long time ago.
Speaker 2: We went to Toronto. Uh, together, we saw Harvey's. Her
Speaker 2: last name was Harvey, So I thought.
Speaker 1: We prefer five guys.
Speaker 2: That sounds a little weird, buddy, I didn't name it.
Speaker 2: They let you, They let you sit there and munch
Speaker 2: on their nuts while they're making your face.
Speaker 1: Yes they do. Actually, yep, that's our favorite. There's only
Speaker 1: one in Vancouver now there used to be one here.
Speaker 1: We go to Vancouver, we make sure we have five guys.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's they have good breakers. Let's say, let's see
Speaker 2: what there's only like a minute left here.
Speaker 6: Because there's many who are not making the appointments for
Speaker 6: their second doses, and you will not get that ninety
Speaker 6: safety and efficacy.
Speaker 2: I acted talking out of your ass based on such
Speaker 2: fucking point.
Speaker 1: And you know any of this?
Speaker 2: And how do you know any of this?
Speaker 1: Where's it? Where's the sources up on the screen should
Speaker 1: be the sources of what she's talking about. This is
Speaker 1: what we do, right, We show sources all over the
Speaker 1: place that substantiate the claims that we're making. Mainstream media,
Speaker 1: one time out of a thousand might provide a source
Speaker 1: for what they're saying, and then when you go to
Speaker 1: that source, it's all bullshit. There's this is all propped up.
Speaker 1: It's all card a house of cards, that's ready to
Speaker 1: come down. You can clearly see it.
Speaker 2: Look at these fucking two demons next to her staring
Speaker 2: at at the screen, at the at the camera like
Speaker 2: they're fucking going to eat your soul in fluorescent.
Speaker 1: It's kind of weird.
Speaker 9: Yeah, if you don't get both doses, you can go
Speaker 9: back to the very beginning of Operation warp speed Trump here.
Speaker 2: Let's go ahead and read these because I did this
Speaker 2: already once. But everybody, go get your shot. The vaccine
Speaker 2: is a great thing and people should take advantage of it.
Speaker 2: I would recommend it to my vaccine skeptic allies. What
Speaker 2: however the fuck that means? Don't let the Libs win
Speaker 2: when you promote vaccine skepticism. Wow, I recommend you take it.
Speaker 2: Once you get the vaccine, you get better. This is
Speaker 2: the guy that they're oh no, but because it's just
Speaker 2: somebody I ever met in in hydroxy chloroquine, he's he's
Speaker 2: a hero. Yeah, okay, yeah, once you get the vaccine,
Speaker 2: you get better. That's a fucking lie. Take the vaccine.
Speaker 2: It's working. What does that mean? It's working?
Speaker 6: You know?
Speaker 2: The assumptions and presumptions of what these statements mean are
Speaker 2: why people are so stupid. What do you mean it's working?
Speaker 2: It's working. How is it working to benefit your your condition?
Speaker 2: Or is it working because it's taking people out? The
Speaker 2: vaccines do work, yeah, work in what way? Work to
Speaker 2: eliminate the population? Yeah, you're absolutely right. It is tremendously
Speaker 2: successful in that sense, all in favor of the vaccine.
Speaker 2: People aren't dying when you take the vaccine.
Speaker 1: And those are all the declarative sentences with a period
Speaker 1: at the end. There's no question mark. That is a
Speaker 1: statement of fact that he is saying there. So he's
Speaker 1: either ignorant of the reality or he is complicit in
Speaker 1: the agenda.
Speaker 9: Rum's been pushing the vaccine the whole time. He even
Speaker 9: called himself the father of the vaccine.
Speaker 2: And look, I guess in a certain way, I'm the
Speaker 2: father of the vaccine because I was the one that
Speaker 2: pushed it. I pushed the FDA like they have never
Speaker 2: been pushed before.
Speaker 9: It shows you how unpainful that vaccine shot is.
Speaker 3: So everybody go get your shot.
Speaker 2: So the whether or not it's painful when it sticks
Speaker 2: to you is what does make people hesitant. I think
Speaker 2: that's kind of silly. Yeah, well, it's just a little
Speaker 2: just a little pinch. Yeah, no, it's at the end
Speaker 2: of it. Everything's but everything's wonderful after that.
Speaker 1: Everybody right, and it's news articles like what I've shown
Speaker 1: the New York Times pertussis whooping cough nineteen seventy six,
Speaker 1: swine flew. Now, these are the things that create vaccine hesitancy.
Speaker 1: And I don't like to even use those terms, because
Speaker 1: that's the words they created.
Speaker 2: It looks like he's up in his mouth for that arrow,
Speaker 2: doesn't it. It's like a gobble gobbla.
Speaker 1: Coming out of the mouth they're pointing to it. I
Speaker 1: recommend you get people that do get it get better
Speaker 1: much quicker.
Speaker 2: It's a very important thing to know. They don't get
Speaker 2: nearly a sick, and they.
Speaker 8: Get it, they get better.
Speaker 3: Lindsey grahams an example.
Speaker 2: He said, if I didn't have this vaccine, I would
Speaker 2: have died. Z Graham is your example, the guy who
Speaker 2: wants to murder everybody. And you can that guy.
Speaker 1: You prove the vaccines made you.
Speaker 2: Less sick, unless it's all psychosomatic in the first place,
Speaker 2: which it isn't. I recommend take the vaccines.
Speaker 1: I did it. It's good. Take the vaccines.
Speaker 9: I think I saved many.
Speaker 1: I don't think.
Speaker 9: I know.
Speaker 7: I saved millions and millions.
Speaker 1: Of lives throughout the world. We saved tens of millions
Speaker 1: of lives.
Speaker 2: Take credit. Don't let them take that away from you.
Speaker 1: Okay, so the president may do you agree with that?
Speaker 6: Right?
Speaker 1: Both the President and I are vax And did you
Speaker 1: get the booster? Yes, I got it too.
Speaker 9: And just recently, on November twenty second, Trump wrote operation say.
Speaker 1: We're doing it live Bill O'Reilly?
Speaker 9: Yeah, warp Speed saved hundreds of millions of lives. There
Speaker 9: is no signs of justice for the millions murdered by
Speaker 9: the deadly shots. And if the nanotech in the shots
Speaker 9: is the interface between humans and AI world, then I
Speaker 9: would expect another fake pandemic and more shots reporting for
Speaker 9: info Wars. This is Greg Reece.
Speaker 2: That was Greg g Reece from info Wars, right, yeah,
Speaker 2: I know.
Speaker 1: So that can discredit us right there to millions and
Speaker 1: millions of progressives because it's aj well just like right,
Speaker 1: but Rob's gay, that's actually true.
Speaker 2: But they Yeah, I know. But psychopath it makes it all,
Speaker 2: it makes it all meaningless. And that's his whole point
Speaker 2: is to make make the truth clowny and and say
Speaker 2: stupid things and have an act like a maniac so
Speaker 2: that everybody thinks that people who say these things are
Speaker 2: as crazy as he is.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, And I would say that Trump is a
Speaker 1: bona fide cult of personality. I wouldn't say that Biden was,
Speaker 1: or Harris is. There's no way that there is. Uh,
Speaker 1: their their personality is as attractive as Trump's is. But
Speaker 1: I would say he's just as much of a cult
Speaker 1: of personality as Mao Lennon any of these guys.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I know a lot of a lot of that is. Uh,
Speaker 2: it wasn't the funny enough kind of like the same situation.
Speaker 2: It wasn't really the people that were behind any of
Speaker 2: those leaders. It was there. It was forced they was
Speaker 2: forced upon us, right, so it was forced upon the
Speaker 2: Russians it was. It wasn't the Russians that were bringing
Speaker 2: those people in. It was the Bolshevik Jews that did that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we're shown that that's all aligned through the principles
Speaker 1: of scientific management, the subjugation of all of their respective populations,
Speaker 1: through the translation of Frederick Winslow's Taylor's Principles of Scientific Management.
Speaker 1: This is how they This is why I referred to
Speaker 1: the Illuminati as the perfectibilists, because this is what scientific
Speaker 1: management was aiming to do, was to perfect the man,
Speaker 1: perfect the human being. They talk about this all the
Speaker 1: time through their work, their literature of the turn of
Speaker 1: the centry.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the perfectibalistic and that was you know, you're having
Speaker 2: you have a guy who was the son of a
Speaker 2: rabbi who becomes a Jesuit who's teaching in university. We're
Speaker 2: talking about of course, what do you call it? Wife's
Speaker 2: out right, But that's not even in the full face
Speaker 2: of it. That's it's not just why I stopping Roth's child,
Speaker 2: it's why stop rosschild? And the Frank Frank is Frank?
Speaker 2: And what did they infiltrate? And what was going on
Speaker 2: during that time? You had a a a low period
Speaker 2: in the Jesuit order where they were kind of we
Speaker 2: want to say, suppressed or disbanded or or renounced or whatever.
Speaker 2: And they all infiltrate the Freemasonic order where the Protestants
Speaker 2: once were who were seeking refuge from the hunting of
Speaker 2: the you know, the the Jesuit. Now they're all hanging
Speaker 2: out in club, right, How does that happen? And what
Speaker 2: was going on there? For real? And then the entire
Speaker 2: structure of like the French lodge, they added like so
Speaker 2: many more degrees to they were up to forty five
Speaker 2: different degrees in the Masonic lodges and new new, new principles,
Speaker 2: new new it's all subversive. It was all anti monarchy.
Speaker 2: It was all this stuff and it was all brand new,
Speaker 2: and it was all infiltrated. There, you know, the louring
Speaker 2: Kabala becomes the main source of their of their of
Speaker 2: their existence, and from there on you have coming out
Speaker 2: of that, you've got Desionism. Zionism is from Frankism is
Speaker 2: from lourn Cabala is from Talmud prior to that. But
Speaker 2: that's that's the you know, the the personification of all
Speaker 2: the bad elements of Torah, Talmud, it all, it's all
Speaker 2: part of that Frankest movement that was, oh we all
Speaker 2: of a sudden, you don't talk about the Francist because
Speaker 2: that's stupid. Well, if you don't want to read ten
Speaker 2: thousand pages of the Talmud and you want to get
Speaker 2: the cliff notes, just look at the Frankest because they
Speaker 2: personify all that shit. Right.
Speaker 1: So my question to you, Daniel is because this interests
Speaker 1: me and I don't know the answer to this, but
Speaker 1: I have a sneaking feeling that it plays a prominent role.
Speaker 1: But how pervasive, how comprehensive is Frankism in our society?
Speaker 1: Is it so comprehensive that we can say that it
Speaker 1: is the source or the beginnings of all this satanic
Speaker 1: stuff that we've looked at or the I.
Speaker 2: Don't want to say it's begin are. I think it
Speaker 2: was the more recent face of it. I think throughout
Speaker 2: history we're still looking at the Moon cult, Saturn Saturn cult,
Speaker 2: you know, the Abrahamic death cults. But what you're looking
Speaker 2: at is an extremist group within a group who pretended,
Speaker 2: for public appearance to be anti Telmuddhists. And what do
Speaker 2: they do right after they they burned talmud in in
Speaker 2: in public. And I guarantee you this was directly in
Speaker 2: response and in coordination with the rabbinical uh you know,
Speaker 2: groups and leaders, because what they wanted to do is
Speaker 2: they wanted to sell this idea that the Francists were
Speaker 2: going to convert honestly to Catholicism, because then the twenty
Speaker 2: six thousand of them got baptized yea, which is.
Speaker 1: Like Hollywood movies. Now there's one out to the Bone,
Speaker 1: I think it's called, and it's it's basically a love
Speaker 1: story of two cannibals that go on a murdering spree.
Speaker 1: This is an actual movie. Now, would you say that
Speaker 1: Frankism is the influence behind all of that?
Speaker 2: Uh, they're they're personifying that, but this is still an
Speaker 2: older thing, like you have the the again, you go
Speaker 2: right back to the cults that were in Sameria, that
Speaker 2: were in Babylon, and it's that priest craft that is
Speaker 2: at the core of all of it. And it was
Speaker 2: a moon colt at one time could be identified as
Speaker 2: such and also Saturn cult And then even even when
Speaker 2: you're looking at Mecca, it's still a giant black cube.
Speaker 2: It's the board collective cube, just in a in a
Speaker 2: less technological look, and they they circummaculated it just like
Speaker 2: they would have Masonic lodged. They do it seven times
Speaker 2: there to apparently count the rings of Saturn or whatever
Speaker 2: the hell it is. And and it's all it's also
Speaker 2: the same thing. Just now they're saying it, you know
Speaker 2: it's the cultive Abraham because they put a new mask
Speaker 2: on it, put a new shield on.
Speaker 1: So then all of the followers don't understand that they're
Speaker 1: actually following this Saturday night.
Speaker 2: I don't think it's conscious, but it's still serving the
Speaker 2: same thing, and it's still giving you still going to
Speaker 2: as long as they have your your, your wilful participation,
Speaker 2: they can steer you any way they want, right And
Speaker 2: if you believe it there's something virtuous, all the better
Speaker 2: because then you won't you know, you'll go along with it.
Speaker 1: And I would say that that's the trick that they've
Speaker 1: done with progressivism too, the misdefinitions of things. Defining our
Speaker 1: terms is extremely important because terms have more than one meaning. Well,
Speaker 1: so when we're talking about climate change or whatever it is,
Speaker 1: we must before we get involved in any emotional back
Speaker 1: and forth, right and wrong, we must define our terms.
Speaker 2: And this whole idea too of the expert is is
Speaker 2: a distinguishing characteristic right where you have to have this
Speaker 2: piece of paper from this indoctrination camp that only thinks
Speaker 2: one way in order for you to be considered worthy
Speaker 2: of even commenting on a certain topic. So now you
Speaker 2: don't matter and your opinion doesn't matter. You have no
Speaker 2: power in saying this. You are a danger to other
Speaker 2: people because of your misinformation because you're not thinking and
Speaker 2: acting and repeating the same things that those who are
Speaker 2: in control of other information are saying. So it nullifies
Speaker 2: any resistance or any you know, objection to it simply
Speaker 2: by saying you're not qualified to even comment, right, So
Speaker 2: it takes away our power of you know, be an
Speaker 2: objective discerning rational individuals because it's not going with the
Speaker 2: flow of those who we've already deemed are the experts,
Speaker 2: and therefore you're of little of little value to the conversation.
Speaker 1: So that's the rise of professionalization, and that coincides the
Speaker 1: exact same time with the rise of professional sports. So
Speaker 1: you can see there's a and they're moving into this
Speaker 1: administrative man in the thirties, forties and fifties where they're
Speaker 1: going to now subjugate white collar in the environment that
Speaker 1: they want the corporate model rather than blue collar in
Speaker 1: the factory. You can see that they're moving their plan forward,
Speaker 1: going closer to digital information and into nineteen fifties sixties
Speaker 1: corporate model comes this administrative man, the changing images of man.
Speaker 1: They start doing right, and then they'll manipulate it into
Speaker 1: these things.
Speaker 2: And it's funny because it's always they're always gearing at
Speaker 2: them the greater numbers, right, So it's not they're not
Speaker 2: really trying to convince or fool the people who still
Speaker 2: understand how to think critically, and that's why it's so offensive,
Speaker 2: and that they need us. They need us to be
Speaker 2: that upset because without that, they don't have their opposition
Speaker 2: that they can point at number one, number two, they
Speaker 2: don't have enough people wise enough to know what to
Speaker 2: be afraid of, and they need that fear too, so
Speaker 2: they but who they're trying to manipulate are the ones
Speaker 2: that we'll just accept whatever is said from the capacity
Speaker 2: of a television set, a radio station, a magazine, any
Speaker 2: type of right, the sense of authority.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 1: Yeah, So you look at World War one, World War
Speaker 1: two propaganda posters. They're ridiculous. They imply that they're eating
Speaker 1: the heads off of babies, bayoneting babies. The Beast of
Speaker 1: Berlin was used before Hitler, So it's the lowest common
Speaker 1: denominator they're going after. They don't give a shit about
Speaker 1: you and I because we're far less in number, right,
Speaker 1: and maybe one hundred years now. Right, the general population
Speaker 1: is generally blissfully ignorant, and so you know that resistance
Speaker 1: is natural, even in electricity, to have resistance, it's it's necessary.
Speaker 1: So it creates heat. But this is our role, is it.
Speaker 1: You know, we have to show where they've gone wrong.
Speaker 1: The contradiction creates heat.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And that's the whole idea of like, you know,
Speaker 2: you're a droplet of water and the ocean is going
Speaker 2: this way and you're trying to stand against it. It
Speaker 2: doesn't matter what you think or how you resist, because
Speaker 2: the flow of all these other retards is what's going
Speaker 2: to push you whatever direction that's going to go. If
Speaker 2: you only give out in a stream and a current,
Speaker 2: same deal, you know, what are you resisting?
Speaker 1: Right? And one thing I want to say to you here, Daniel,
Speaker 1: is it over the last couple of weeks and over
Speaker 1: the last few months even, but more more pronounced now,
Speaker 1: is that I'm having really great conversations with admitted progressives.
Speaker 1: They have issues with something I say, We get into
Speaker 1: a conversation and you can see that they're like, oh, well,
Speaker 1: that's interesting. They're not aware of the definition change of
Speaker 1: liberalism necessarily. And I think that if we could ever
Speaker 1: get the progressives on our side, they would be a
Speaker 1: valuable ally because They are that next level of people
Speaker 1: that are interesting in politics. They're not completely apathetic because
Speaker 1: they're involved in the two party system and they're radical.
Speaker 1: They're willing to get out there and say things that
Speaker 1: most won't. So if we can actually show them that
Speaker 1: the trick has been how the trick was played on them,
Speaker 1: and they can understand it, I've seen, and I am
Speaker 1: a former progressive, I will admit that this is where
Speaker 1: I come from from the left. I asked my mom
Speaker 1: a long time ago, what are we She says, well,
Speaker 1: we're a democrat. And then sure, shit, as soon as
Speaker 1: you start asking for radical social reform, you are no
Speaker 1: longer leftist necessarily, you are a progressive, a radical leftist,
Speaker 1: all of a sudden. So we get progressives on our side,
Speaker 1: and they start working for us in the proper direction,
Speaker 1: not against their own self interest. This is what I've
Speaker 1: been finding in the last couple of weeks, that a
Speaker 1: lot of progressives, a lot of recovering progressives, are coming
Speaker 1: to me and asking me for things, asking me how
Speaker 1: it is that this came about, or why they fell
Speaker 1: for this, and that, you know. So I encourage any progressive,
Speaker 1: anybody that considers themselves even a member of the left
Speaker 1: right now to go look at our work bulletproofpub dot
Speaker 1: com and we're going to start making sense of this
Speaker 1: world for you, to show you how this went down.
Speaker 2: So very well. Yeah, and that's the reason why I
Speaker 2: tackle things from the very beginning, is because we need
Speaker 2: to see where the origins and the roots of these
Speaker 2: things are. So where I go to Pastor, I'm not
Speaker 2: going to go to Fauci, I'm not going to go
Speaker 2: to Azt. I'm I'm going to go to know this
Speaker 2: whole thing from the very beginning. That's this is the
Speaker 2: lie that's been carried on. And it was obvious then
Speaker 2: and people shot it down then, so it's only become
Speaker 2: more and more of a of a fraudulent lie since then.
Speaker 2: So you go to the source and okay, we can't
Speaker 2: just remove something, you have to fill it with something else. Well,
Speaker 2: that's where Beichamp actually explains how everything actually really does
Speaker 2: work in biology. And there you have it. So, now
Speaker 2: here's the here's the truth, and here's the fiction, and
Speaker 2: the fiction is what they're going with. And this is
Speaker 2: what's killing people and it's on purpose, and it goes
Speaker 2: back to Darwinism, it goes back to you know, this whole,
Speaker 2: this whole built you know, this whole you know, efficiency
Speaker 2: model of getting rid of the people that don't matter
Speaker 2: and all this other stuff, and basically it's all tied
Speaker 2: into this whole kabalistic get rid of the goy thing
Speaker 2: because either their honorary you know, fellow traveler GOI or
Speaker 2: they're not. They're this pretend cult thing that they called juice.
Speaker 1: And in America, that was all brought to you by
Speaker 1: Theodore Roosevelt. That's the first progressive platform by a president
Speaker 1: ever in the history of America, and that nineteen twelve
Speaker 1: election was hugely important. I mean, this goes back as
Speaker 1: we've been showing. And I watched your last podcast with
Speaker 1: the author of that Lincoln book. What's his name?
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, Donald Jeffers.
Speaker 1: Definitely. I would love to talk to that guy. He
Speaker 1: is weird.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that was on a Wednesday. That was on a
Speaker 2: bulletproof day.
Speaker 1: Damn get out. Yeah, okay, well.
Speaker 2: Together, but then you would be able to make it.
Speaker 1: I missed one because I watched that, and then I
Speaker 1: watched another of his own podcast. I'm like, this guy's
Speaker 1: really close to seeing all of this, yet he's not
Speaker 1: really mentioning Brandeis.
Speaker 2: And yeah, I actually mentioned that in there, and he
Speaker 2: also it's uh, I think maybe because of popular trending news,
Speaker 2: but he goes too much into the whole ins and
Speaker 2: outs of you know, coming up with clever Trump's Trump
Speaker 2: and Stein and I just I think that's a little
Speaker 2: bit common commercial. But it's if that's what helps his
Speaker 2: substect that all the better. But I mean, let's get
Speaker 2: to the root of things. Let's see where this evil
Speaker 2: comes from and why it's so powerful right now, Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's my approach is a history, you know, it's let's
Speaker 2: go back to the beginning. When did this all start
Speaker 2: and when did deceptions occur? And that's why I'm reading
Speaker 2: the Wadell books now and to people the British edit
Speaker 2: and stuff like that. Right, it's been a long time.
Speaker 1: I appreciate. I appreciate your approach because not everybody does that.
Speaker 1: To go and use historical method, the use of artifacts
Speaker 1: and primary source material is the best that we have
Speaker 1: to the truth any anything else. Yeah, you can lead
Speaker 1: yourself open to all kinds of things and not with
Speaker 1: our approach, but it's the percentage of being exploited is very,
Speaker 1: very small. Amount.
Speaker 2: Well, because you have to accept a certain amount of
Speaker 2: whatever they're trying in order to make sense of like
Speaker 2: somewhere in the middle of that chronology. Okay, well, we
Speaker 2: don't know until we go back further how much of
Speaker 2: that is bullshit, right, So we don't want to be
Speaker 2: we don't want to be also going on our own
Speaker 2: wrong tangent. Even though we're addressing some of the problems,
Speaker 2: we're still creating more of them. No, let's get back
Speaker 2: to where the beginning is, before they even thought of
Speaker 2: lying about this type of shit, and see where it
Speaker 2: went from there.
Speaker 1: You know, yeah, that is exactly what I thought when
Speaker 1: we went to look at the origins of society being
Speaker 1: governed by the scientific expert or the Council on Foreign
Speaker 1: Relations or the un all of these things, the Federal Reserve,
Speaker 1: the administrative state. I went back to the origins to
Speaker 1: where this first was instituted or thought of. And they
Speaker 1: even say that Brandeis was the conceiver. So that's the
Speaker 1: nexus of the thought in the mind. So that is tracing.
Speaker 1: But what put down the government's.
Speaker 2: Ability to avail was the banking system of the Rothschilds
Speaker 2: and all these other people. So then Okay, so what
Speaker 2: gave them that? And why? What is their purpose? And
Speaker 2: why are they doing this to mankind? Then you got
Speaker 2: to go back. Okay, then this this this whole cult thing,
Speaker 2: and it's this whole strange fucking hatred for you know,
Speaker 2: Norsemen that happened five thousand fucking years ago that they
Speaker 2: haven't gotten over yet. It's like, you know, it's like
Speaker 2: it goes so deep man.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And I think when you get a context of this,
Speaker 1: you know, society governed by the technical scientific expert, When
Speaker 1: you get the concept and how it goes back in time,
Speaker 1: you can far more easily navigate in real time here
Speaker 1: because you hear it in their language. This is why
Speaker 1: it's important to point out the words that they use, efficiency, preparedness.
Speaker 1: You know, like a lot of progressives think that they
Speaker 1: are pacifists, yet one of the main pillars of progressivism
Speaker 1: is perpetual war, right, this is what they created. Some
Speaker 1: of the founders of the preparedness movement, you know, the
Speaker 1: three main guys are William Howard Taft, Henry Stimpson and
Speaker 1: a Elahuru. They're all skull and bones. Five day to count.
Speaker 2: And this is what's funny is on once they have
Speaker 2: control of one country or another whatever. And you know
Speaker 2: they didn't even have to because if they're the financiers
Speaker 2: of everything, they're financing both sides. Like you say, But
Speaker 2: who comes in at the end of that war and
Speaker 2: everything's destroyed and puts their own embassy in its place.
Speaker 2: It's the banks. They call it a central bank, and
Speaker 2: then they control it IMF Bank of International Settlements that
Speaker 2: is their embassy. Now that is the government because you're
Speaker 2: in debt to them. They call the shots, they own
Speaker 2: the natural resources, They change the course of politics, they
Speaker 2: make or break everybody in between there and limit the
Speaker 2: amount of freedoms or whatever they want to do there,
Speaker 2: and then the so it goes, and then there's the
Speaker 2: United Nations all of a sudden, because they've done it
Speaker 2: so many times, it's just it's so disgusting. It's so
Speaker 2: disgusting how they do it, and it's not for them.
Speaker 2: It's like they don't even have to fight the war.
Speaker 2: They have other people do it. Then they walk in
Speaker 2: and just set their embassy down.
Speaker 1: Yeah, this is why a lot of the people that
Speaker 1: are CEOs and chairmans of these organizations that are hurting
Speaker 1: us are a master of liberal arts degrees or business majors,
Speaker 1: because they've been given the most information that our controllers
Speaker 1: want humans to have and they so they are now
Speaker 1: governors or managers of our society. So could you imagin
Speaker 1: think that the liberal arts is a very important thing.
Speaker 1: We've discussed this before, that it is really the crux
Speaker 1: upon which history has been told, the conscious versus the unconscious,
Speaker 1: being able to structure sentences together into paragraphs, into compositions,
Speaker 1: and be able to chain reasoning together and talk back
Speaker 1: and forth properly in a sophisticated way in which we
Speaker 1: are fully immersed in reality and not just what that
Speaker 1: education did for us and they removed it.
Speaker 2: And that's and that type of education that you're talking
Speaker 2: about only works if you have that internal substance within
Speaker 2: your being. To actually have it has to resonate with
Speaker 2: that person, because there's some people you can tell anything
Speaker 2: or show anything to and it's not going to matter
Speaker 2: because they don't have the capacity. You have to have
Speaker 2: the capacity first toually have discernment to do all these
Speaker 2: other things. And I think it all comes back to
Speaker 2: compassion and empathy for others. And if you don't have that,
Speaker 2: then you're not ever looking at the injustices. And if
Speaker 2: you don't knocking ant the injustices, you're not considering anything
Speaker 2: to be wrong. And you're also taking advantage of the
Speaker 2: fact that you do not see these things because you're
Speaker 2: using whatever works for you and your own selfish gain,
Speaker 2: So you're not ever going to even try to consider
Speaker 2: what could be wrong with the situation.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and it's really likely that that same person thinks
Speaker 1: that there's more than one truth, that it's their truth
Speaker 1: that they're going to live. This is what we hear
Speaker 1: all the time. But there is only one truth, the
Speaker 1: actual reality. And we do have the capabilities today to
Speaker 1: get as close as possible we get. We have the
Speaker 1: ability today to get close enough to be able to
Speaker 1: identify as we have here and as we are talking
Speaker 1: about and have been talking about for a long time now,
Speaker 1: the real main causal factors and the people that were
Speaker 1: really responsible for all of the shit that we're complaining
Speaker 1: about today.
Speaker 2: So, yeah, just think about it like you're you're one
Speaker 2: of these giant banking locals. You're trillions upun billions of dollars.
Speaker 2: What besides hatred would drive you at that point, you
Speaker 2: already own everything, you already control everything. You already black
Speaker 2: rocked the whole fucking planet. What is it that you're
Speaker 2: still after that You're not satisfied? And imagine if these
Speaker 2: people actually did have a conscience, did give a fuck
Speaker 2: about anything besides destruction and human misery. Imagine how much
Speaker 2: different the world would be if that type of power
Speaker 2: was in the hands of someone who actually wanted to
Speaker 2: do something just with it.
Speaker 1: Right, And this is what I say about that education,
Speaker 1: is that I would I would love to know where
Speaker 1: we would be right now if that education wasn't removed.
Speaker 1: There is no way we would be as ignorant as
Speaker 1: we are today. And I think that's you know, the
Speaker 1: absence of that over generations also contributes to this apathetic
Speaker 1: approach that people have, this inability to perceive two you know,
Speaker 1: fall into the logical ruts of, uh, what's the term?
Speaker 4: Uh?
Speaker 1: I can't remember one of these terms that keeps us
Speaker 1: away from the truth. Uh in cognitive dis isn't yes,
Speaker 1: cognitive dissonance?
Speaker 2: This is it? So yeah, being being can't be true
Speaker 2: at the same time. Type of thing like that, Right, Holding.
Speaker 1: Two contradictory ideas in your mind, this is what starts
Speaker 1: the splinter. This is, you know, pointing these things out
Speaker 1: to progressives and people on the left. This is really
Speaker 1: what upsets them.
Speaker 2: So yeah, it's a it's a very strange, confluted world
Speaker 2: that we live in, and unfortunately it's getting uh that
Speaker 2: they're going all in and whatever is around the corner
Speaker 2: isn't too far away. And uh, I don't think that
Speaker 2: we're gonna understand. Well, obviously they've already read classified. What
Speaker 2: freedom is is whatever the government lets you do, and
Speaker 2: that's not freedom.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Woodrow Wilson, New Freedom, sameyre, new democracy, same here,
Speaker 1: new spirit, sameyere, new republic. Right, they rewrit everything. This
Speaker 1: is where they they just repainted the canvas white and
Speaker 1: then drew a progressive image of the future.
Speaker 2: Yes, sir, And with that, we gotta do you want
Speaker 2: to say anything before we head out. I gotta go
Speaker 2: to that little thing going on over at my daughter school.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that sounds awesome. And I would say thank you
Speaker 1: for whoever's here and been listening and watching, and I
Speaker 1: look forward to talking again with you next week. Daniel.
Speaker 2: All right, sir, thank you so much. Have a good
Speaker 2: Thanksgiving my friend you too, and anybody you know where
Speaker 2: the descriptions are. You can find the UH stuff for
Speaker 2: this show and for you'll find bulb bud dot com
Speaker 2: and if you scroll down you see the White Rabbit.
Speaker 2: You can help support his UH his efforts as well.
Speaker 2: And you'll also see the list of all the other
Speaker 2: interviews that he did there from various different podcasters, so
Speaker 2: you can go ahead and check those out that he
Speaker 2: showed at the beginning.
Speaker 1: All right, all right, thanks everybody, kitch you later.