Speaker 1: Hurt right here, folks twenty twenty four, Folks, Chan is well.
Speaker 2: Chinese first, the generation. We love Trump from our bottom
Speaker 2: of the hard because we know Tremble is the only
Speaker 2: one can save America. Kamanda is so stupid, she is
Speaker 2: so low, ain't you echo, don't que no qualification to
Speaker 2: be the president. You shall stay away from that position.
Speaker 2: You are the lost the position. You lost our trust,
Speaker 2: you lost our vote. You're just you go home to
Speaker 2: stay home. You cannot do anything to save America. You
Speaker 2: are so stupid, you don't know anything. You cannot even
Speaker 2: answer and then question from the camera, from all the media,
Speaker 2: how you can be on the stage to fight home
Speaker 2: far America, to protect American people, to protect all the world.
Speaker 2: You are not to quified.
Speaker 1: You tell me where the lie is? You can't you
Speaker 1: can't point out the lie because she just spitting straight facts.
Speaker 1: Shout out to the adorable Chinese lady. What a fantastic
Speaker 1: human being she is speaking her mind. That's the American way.
Speaker 1: Is it not free speech at all? Man? She didn't
Speaker 1: hold back anyways. I think that what we've seen over
Speaker 1: the past few days, but really over the past couple months,
Speaker 1: and is that the left can't take a joke, and
Speaker 1: the right is kind of leaning into the anti cancel
Speaker 1: culture worldview more and more now. For those that aren't aware,
Speaker 1: I do a comedy podcast called Tower Gang and it's
Speaker 1: totally totally raw. The reason that this has come to
Speaker 1: the four is that Tony Clint Tony Hinchcliff of Kill
Speaker 1: Tony fame, did a set at the Madison Square Garden
Speaker 1: rally in front of tens of thousands of Trump supporters
Speaker 1: yesterday and he said some things that were off color
Speaker 1: about a bunch of different races and ethnicities, and of
Speaker 1: course one got picked up and has become the topic
Speaker 1: du jure. And I think that this is my read
Speaker 1: of the nation. I could be wrong, but I think
Speaker 1: most people are over it. I think most people have
Speaker 1: dealt with so many years of this kind of school
Speaker 1: marmish cancel culture mentality of just sucking all of the
Speaker 1: joy out of the room, that they're just kind of
Speaker 1: done with it. At least that's my hope. I certainly am.
Speaker 1: I've been over it basically since before it began. I
Speaker 1: never became a participant in it. I have rejected it
Speaker 1: from the get go. It just seems that now more
Speaker 1: and more of the country is coming over into my
Speaker 1: camp where they're just saying, you know what, fuck this.
Speaker 1: I'm not worried, I'm not scared. Do your worst, and
Speaker 1: I think that there's strength in numbers. I think that
Speaker 1: if we're all willing to stand with our chins held
Speaker 1: high and our back stiff, that it really is kind
Speaker 1: of an empty threat, like you can't fire all of
Speaker 1: us now. Granted that I don't work at corporate gigs,
Speaker 1: so maybe you still can be fired. It depends on
Speaker 1: where you work, who your boss is. And it does
Speaker 1: seem as if the threat of canceling people is fading.
Speaker 1: And I think that some people will argue that perhaps
Speaker 1: tactically it was not intelligent to have someone as brash
Speaker 1: as Tony Hinchcliffe on stage eight ten days whatever it
Speaker 1: is from the election, I liked it. I'll just put
Speaker 1: my cards on the table. I loved it. Honestly. I
Speaker 1: love risk taking. I love bucking trends, I love starting trends.
Speaker 1: I love people that are willing to push the envelope,
Speaker 1: push the limit, step over the line. Sometimes. I think
Speaker 1: it's a great thing. I think it's healthy. I think
Speaker 1: that's where comedy actually lives, and if you're unwilling to
Speaker 1: do that, then you're a joyless, unfunny scumbag most of
Speaker 1: the time. That's my honest opinion about these types of people.
Speaker 1: So I hope it doesn't hurt Trump's chances. More than that,
Speaker 1: I hope that I'm right in my read of the
Speaker 1: national mood in that we are just totally sick to
Speaker 1: death of this mindset and that the vast majority of
Speaker 1: us are just done playing along with it. There is
Speaker 1: no real animosity when it comes to making jokes about
Speaker 1: Puerto Rico, and in fact, there's a lot of truth
Speaker 1: behind the things that he said, though I doubt that's
Speaker 1: why he made the joke. I'll play you a portion
Speaker 1: of the bit so you can see what all the
Speaker 1: hubbub's about.
Speaker 3: There's a lot going on, Like I don't know if
Speaker 3: you guys know this, but there's literally a floating island
Speaker 3: of garbage in the middle of the ocean right now. Yeah,
Speaker 3: I think it's called Puerto Rico. Okay, all right, Okay,
Speaker 3: we're getting there.
Speaker 4: Who is that Jack Wad?
Speaker 5: Actually I think that's Tony Hinchcliffe, which is super disappointing.
Speaker 5: I mean, I don't he's a comedian.
Speaker 6: I don't follow like this Puerto Rico again.
Speaker 1: So there we have AOC and Tim Walls playing Madden
Speaker 1: together because they're trying to reach out to men, they're
Speaker 1: continuing to fail, and it's hilarious. In fact, he said
Speaker 1: that AOC can run a mean pick six. This guy
Speaker 1: allegedly coached Hi school football team, and he talks about
Speaker 1: football as if he's never even played the sport or
Speaker 1: certainly not coached it. You don't run a pick six.
Speaker 1: You don't run that. I mean, it's nice if you
Speaker 1: get a pick six, but you don't run one. So yeah,
Speaker 1: he's a fraud again for the umpteeth time. But you
Speaker 1: could tell, like their immediate reaction is AOC despite I
Speaker 1: was actually shocked. She knows who who Tony Hinchcliffe is,
Speaker 1: so she knew it was a joke. She knows he's
Speaker 1: a comedian, but she still it didn't stop her from
Speaker 1: absolutely losing her mind. Over the next twenty four hours.
Speaker 1: She actually stayed relatively calm on that stream. She goes
Speaker 1: completely ballistic later, which I'll show you a clip from.
Speaker 1: But this is this is kind of democratic one oh one.
Speaker 1: At this point, our democrat party one on one is
Speaker 1: that you feign outrage even when you're not. You use
Speaker 1: whatever opportunity you have to paint your political enemy in
Speaker 1: the worst light imaginable, even if it doesn't really bear
Speaker 1: much in the realm of reality. And that's what they
Speaker 1: seem to be doing. And I think that that's what
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris has been doing her entire campaign, all three
Speaker 1: months of it now, is that she doesn't have anything
Speaker 1: to really run on aside from not being Trump, and
Speaker 1: the only way she can get people to support her
Speaker 1: is to condemn those that don't. That's it. How could
Speaker 1: you be so racist, sex ast, homophobic, all of the
Speaker 1: things that basically happened back in twenty six sixteen that
Speaker 1: helped Trump win because I think a lot of people
Speaker 1: weren't playing along with it back then either. It seems
Speaker 1: like they're running the same playbook. It's crazy. I don't
Speaker 1: see how it's going to work out for them this time.
Speaker 1: It didn't work out so hot in twenty sixteen, now
Speaker 1: did it. So I think that this is a losing
Speaker 1: game plan, a basically a script that has stopped working.
Speaker 1: And to me, it's really just demonstrating their desperation that
Speaker 1: They are at the end of their rope. They have
Speaker 1: nothing else that they can do at this point. They
Speaker 1: can't really reformulate that like once you've already called someone
Speaker 1: a hitler like e, that's it that Where do you
Speaker 1: Where do you go from there? You can't you can't
Speaker 1: go worse. Essentially, what we're witnessing is a political party.
Speaker 1: That is, they are the political party of the boy
Speaker 1: who cried wolf too many times. They have cried it
Speaker 1: and cried it, and cried it and cried it, and
Speaker 1: no one is listening to their cries any longer. Even
Speaker 1: if even if they're right and a wolf is approaching,
Speaker 1: no one's gonna listen. And that's where they're at. But
Speaker 1: is it stopping them? Are they reflecting on it? Are
Speaker 1: they saying to themselves, Okay, let's uh we pushed it.
Speaker 1: We we you know, when we were calling Mitt Romney
Speaker 1: you know a factis and things like that, we probably
Speaker 1: should have saved that one, uh, so that we could
Speaker 1: use it on Trump. Now we've used it on Trump
Speaker 1: for eight ears. That's also not working. There's nothing else
Speaker 1: we can do. There have been some headlines where they
Speaker 1: try and combine him. They go he's Hitler, he's Mussolini,
Speaker 1: he's uh, I don't know, maw all rolled into one
Speaker 1: or Stalin all rolled into one. Okay, like we get it.
Speaker 1: He's the worst person on the planet. He's the worst
Speaker 1: person in history. But that's nothing new. You've been saying
Speaker 1: that consistently for eight straight years. You're going to have
Speaker 1: to do better. But despite the fact that aoc knew
Speaker 1: he was a comedian, this is how she responded.
Speaker 5: You know, this, honestly isn't really about a comedian. This
Speaker 5: is about the Trump campaign. Those comments and that individual
Speaker 5: saying those things on that stage, inciting an entire arena
Speaker 5: of individuals who had been previously incited to commit attacks
Speaker 5: like the ones we saw in January sixth by people
Speaker 5: like Donald Trump. None of that was an accident. These
Speaker 5: campaign events are put together, they are vetted. That language
Speaker 5: was vetted by the Trump campaign. He is speaking on
Speaker 5: behalf of the Trump campaign.
Speaker 1: Apologies for some of the audio issues there. I think
Speaker 1: her hair was on her mike fob or whatever it's called.
Speaker 1: You could see that she's extrapolating what is a joke, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, didn't get much of reaction. When you
Speaker 1: listen back to it. The crowd was like, they groaned,
Speaker 1: They didn't boob, but they're like, ah, oh man, that's
Speaker 1: you know, this is one of those jokes that makes
Speaker 1: the crowd uncomfortable. Tony Hinchcliff is famous for that. That's
Speaker 1: what he attempts to do. He tries to really push
Speaker 1: the envelope and then he circles back to some humor
Speaker 1: that actually made them laugh. And I'm gonna play that
Speaker 1: for you so you can actually see what the sentiment
Speaker 1: of the average Trump supporter is right now.
Speaker 3: I don't know about you guys, but I think that
Speaker 3: Travis Kelcey might be the next oj Simpson. Feels good
Speaker 3: in here. The other side's got a lot of crazy endorsements, Swift, Eminem,
Speaker 3: Leo DiCaprio, Beyonce. Every day the Democratic Party looks more
Speaker 3: and more like a p Diddy party.
Speaker 1: Oh oh okay, So you can see what he's doing there.
Speaker 1: He's basically digging himself a bit of a hole, getting
Speaker 1: them to kind of push back against the direction he's going.
Speaker 1: And then he's giving them what they will find funny,
Speaker 1: which is too make fun of the Democrats and not
Speaker 1: to make fun of people's you know, races, and nationalities
Speaker 1: and things like that. So I thought it was a
Speaker 1: very clever set, and I thought that, you know, he
Speaker 1: accomplished what he wanted to. Tony wants the pr for
Speaker 1: those that aren't familiar with him. He does this show
Speaker 1: called Kill Tony, which is you have these open micers.
Speaker 1: Sometimes it's people that have never been up on stage
Speaker 1: their entire life. They come up and they have to
Speaker 1: do a minute in front of a million plus viewers
Speaker 1: over on the Kill Tony Audience, which is a huge
Speaker 1: YouTube channel. He became very famous as being good friends
Speaker 1: with Joe Rogan and going on Rogan a bunch of times,
Speaker 1: and now he does Kill Tony at Rogan's Comedy Club
Speaker 1: I believe, in Austin once a week and it's hugely successful.
Speaker 1: The episode that he did where Adam Ray and Shane
Speaker 1: Gillis played Donald Trump and Joe Biden had twenty million views.
Speaker 1: So Tony Hinchcliffe is not exactly I mean, he's not
Speaker 1: you know, a household name a lad Joe Rogan, but
Speaker 1: he is one of the most successful touring comics today,
Speaker 1: usually hugely successful. In fact, from what I read, he
Speaker 1: sold out MSG twice to do Kill Tony and back
Speaker 1: to back nights, so crazy, successful, very well known. If
Speaker 1: you're familiar with him at all, none of what he
Speaker 1: had to say rubbed you the wrong way. But again
Speaker 1: I can understand, I can understand the tactical argument of hey,
Speaker 1: we're eight days out, don't take any huge risks like this. Okay, Okay.
Speaker 1: Setting that aside, what I do think is interesting is
Speaker 1: that to me, this is really a referendum on the
Speaker 1: last decade of wokeism. And I think that, unfortunately people
Speaker 1: always push back against this. They would rather not be
Speaker 1: this way. Okay, fine, I wish it weren't too, But
Speaker 1: it is is that politics is now a totem for
Speaker 1: our culture war. That the culture war is fought via politics.
Speaker 1: That's just how it is. It's perhaps some of it,
Speaker 1: in fact began through DEI and ESG, which were largely
Speaker 1: pushed by the United States federal government. So in fact,
Speaker 1: this culture war may be something that they fomented. I'm
Speaker 1: not sure that it's working in their favor at this point,
Speaker 1: and I think that's the good news. And all this
Speaker 1: is that if the school marmish sensorial oh shame culture
Speaker 1: is defeated soundly despite this being their this is their
Speaker 1: home stretch push. I mean a week out from the election,
Speaker 1: give or take, and this is what they're going with.
Speaker 1: Oh my god. A comedian said jokes like, I don't
Speaker 1: know about you, but I think that's a pretty weak
Speaker 1: message to run on. And I think that's a losing message.
Speaker 1: And I think that's a message that you only come
Speaker 1: up with when you are desperate, when you are losing terribly,
Speaker 1: and I think that's what we're witnessing. So from where
Speaker 1: I'm sitting, this is tremendously good news that, in fact,
Speaker 1: the American people have a chance not just to repudiate
Speaker 1: the deep state and Kamala Harris and all of her
Speaker 1: terrible policies, but they also have a chance to repudiate
Speaker 1: cancel culture once again. And I think that's great because
Speaker 1: I would love to see it defeated soundly, and I
Speaker 1: think we have a chance to do. So. What's really
Speaker 1: remarked is that they talk about it as if there
Speaker 1: is this you know, it's a bridge too far, that
Speaker 1: Tony took it too far, that this rhetoric is dangerous.
Speaker 1: Let me show you what they played in the lead
Speaker 1: up to this campaign event. In the hours just prior
Speaker 1: to Tony Hinchcliffe taking the stage. This is how MSNBC was
Speaker 1: covering it.
Speaker 7: But that chamboree happening right now, you see it there
Speaker 7: on your screen in that place is particularly chilling because
Speaker 7: in nineteen thirty nine, more than twenty thousand supporters of
Speaker 7: a different fascist leader, Adolph Hitler, packed the garden for
Speaker 7: a so called pro America rally, a rally where speakers
Speaker 7: voiced anti Semitic rhetoric from a stage draped with Nazi banners.
Speaker 7: When a Jewish protester rushed the stage, the Associated Press
Speaker 7: reported quote, Instantly a dozen or more stormtroopers set upon him,
Speaker 7: knocking him down and beating him. As he held his
Speaker 7: head in his arms. Most of his clothing was torn
Speaker 7: from his body. Later, he was booked for disorderly conduct. Now,
Speaker 7: against that backdrop of history, Donald Trump, the man who
Speaker 7: has threatened to use the military against opponents he calls
Speaker 7: enemies from within, who has threatened to use the troops
Speaker 7: to quell what he says are lawless cities, and to
Speaker 7: use those troops to carry out mass deportations of immigrants,
Speaker 7: is once again turning Madison Square Garden into a staging
Speaker 7: ground for extremism.
Speaker 1: So they're going to hold this event at another place
Speaker 1: eighty five years after for another fascist leader. This is
Speaker 1: a news organization in America that is openly describing the
Speaker 1: former president of United States as a fascist leader. Wow,
Speaker 1: given the fact that he has already been the president
Speaker 1: and left, that's a pretty tough argument to make. But okay,
Speaker 1: you know that's what they're going to say. We'll let
Speaker 1: them have that one. What I find more appalling is
Speaker 1: a segment in the middle of that clip there where
Speaker 1: they start talking about what he's said or what he's done,
Speaker 1: and more or less every claim about Trump one is
Speaker 1: a projection of things that they intend to do, but
Speaker 1: two is so overstated and so off the mark, and
Speaker 1: oftentimes they condemn him, taking him out of context for
Speaker 1: things that I actually agree with. What he said a
Speaker 1: few weeks ago when he talked about the enemy within,
Speaker 1: to me, it was crystal clear what he was saying
Speaker 1: is that he was talking about essentially the deep state,
Speaker 1: those that the unelected bureaucracy that has worked to undermine
Speaker 1: his presidency and therefore the rule of the democratically elected president,
Speaker 1: and they are the enemy within. That's his description. He
Speaker 1: clearly was not talking about the average Democrat voter. He
Speaker 1: was certainly wasn't talking about, you know, just regular citizens.
Speaker 1: So this is just a lie, just a hyperbolic overstatement,
Speaker 1: once again crying wolf as they always do. I think
Speaker 1: that what's really concerning about it is that they are
Speaker 1: talking about the dangerous nature of Tony Hinchcliff's Eric. Well,
Speaker 1: they have spent eight years straight describing every Trump supporter
Speaker 1: as either a fascist themselves or a Nazi or a
Speaker 1: supporter of a fascist. If they're being nice, they might
Speaker 1: just give you that that you're supporting fascism, but you're
Speaker 1: not actually a fascist. You're just you know, a rube
Speaker 1: or a dummy. You don't know what you're doing. But like,
Speaker 1: think about what that's done to our country to have
Speaker 1: that description just retold over and over and over again.
Speaker 1: Not so much because I care about what they say.
Speaker 1: I don't. They're liars, They don't have really much impact
Speaker 1: on my life, But in terms of like, well, I
Speaker 1: guess they do have an impact on my life in
Speaker 1: that the people that watch that garbage and just take
Speaker 1: it in at face value and believe it to be fact,
Speaker 1: they now genuinely believe that half of this country is
Speaker 1: prepared to vote for a fascist. They believe that genuinely,
Speaker 1: and there's no talking them out of it, and there's
Speaker 1: no walking them back from that cliff. And I don't
Speaker 1: know how we stay together as country as long as
Speaker 1: that's the belief. And I don't know how we stay
Speaker 1: together as a country as the other side, which is
Speaker 1: actually very radical in terms of wanting to increase taxes
Speaker 1: to crazy amounts, having taxes on unrealized capital gains which
Speaker 1: would absolutely destroy the economy, a party that's prepared to
Speaker 1: fight World War three to defend Ukraine of no significant
Speaker 1: strategic interest to America, like, they want to do all
Speaker 1: of this radical stuff, but they are perceived to be
Speaker 1: the moderates. They are perceived to be the adults in
Speaker 1: the room, the rational ones. I'm talking to the MSNBC viewer.
Speaker 1: I'm not talking about reality. That is the juxtaposition that
Speaker 1: the average media consumer in America sees and in vibes,
Speaker 1: whether they believe it entirely or not. That's what they're
Speaker 1: being inundated with. Twenty four to seven. You have this
Speaker 1: really radical party which is actually the moderates, totally middle
Speaker 1: of the road, and then you have this guy in
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, who in my opinion, is basically a Democrat
Speaker 1: from nineteen eighty six, Like his policies haven't changed much
Speaker 1: from what a Democratic would be running on in the
Speaker 1: mid eighties. Nobleshit like he is a mid eighties Democrat,
Speaker 1: but they describe him as far right, as a fascist
Speaker 1: as Hitler, I mean, they say it a lot, not exaggerating.
Speaker 1: It's just poisoning people's minds. If they take that at
Speaker 1: face value, they have a truly distorted worldview. They are
Speaker 1: really detached from reality entirely because the average Trump supporter,
Speaker 1: and for that matter, the average Democrat, are not that
Speaker 1: far apart in terms of what they want to see
Speaker 1: for their country. They want to see it safe, secure, prosperous,
Speaker 1: blah blah blah. The average I'm not saying the radical
Speaker 1: Democrats certainly have you know, different expectations, but the average
Speaker 1: Democrat and Republican aren't that far apart. But if you
Speaker 1: only listen to the media, they couldn't be more polar opposite.
Speaker 1: You have these, you know, just really good, kind hearted
Speaker 1: Democrat voters and then you have these actual overt fascists
Speaker 1: that are going to you know, port fifty million people
Speaker 1: and lock up their political opponents and go after the
Speaker 1: enemy within, and they support a guy who tried to
Speaker 1: overthrow the government just three years ago. How could they
Speaker 1: possibly do that? And that's just not the that's not
Speaker 1: the actual paradigm we exist in. Unfortunately, I don't I
Speaker 1: don't think that we can reach a lot of these
Speaker 1: people now. Fortunately, I think most people have already been reached,
Speaker 1: just because the reality of life has caught up with
Speaker 1: the narrative and they're saying to themselves, wow, probably not accurate,
Speaker 1: like this is probably a little bit biased. And I
Speaker 1: think that more and more people, more and more Democrats,
Speaker 1: even particularly the Democrats that came over to the GOP
Speaker 1: side with the RFK Junior endorsement, they are very much
Speaker 1: aware of the deception that's been happening by the corporate media.
Speaker 1: Those that were concerned about the lockdown era or mandates,
Speaker 1: you know, the fauci stuff. I think that they are
Speaker 1: all eyes wide open to what's going on with the
Speaker 1: corporate media. And that's healthy. There's still gonna be thirty
Speaker 1: ish percent of this country that is ride or die MSNBC.
Speaker 1: It's probably not thirty percent that's MSNBC viewers, but you know,
Speaker 1: what I'm saying like probably twenty to thirty percent of
Speaker 1: the country that is going to be they are going
Speaker 1: to absolutely lose their mind if Donald Trump wins, and
Speaker 1: I think he's going to win. And this actually gives
Speaker 1: me an opportunity to talk to you guys about a
Speaker 1: decision that I made a few days ago. I didn't
Speaker 1: get a chance to do an episode on it because
Speaker 1: I had to travel to Orlando, which, by the way,
Speaker 1: we had a great time. It was really really fun.
Speaker 1: We did what's called Brohemian Grove. It was the first
Speaker 1: time we did it. First night was a conspiracy podcast
Speaker 1: and the second night was comedy podcasts and Leonardo Joni
Speaker 1: came out and it was a blast, really really fun.
Speaker 1: Let me show you a clip as to why I
Speaker 1: started to or when I started to seriously think about
Speaker 1: supporting Donald Trump, And it was a long time ago,
Speaker 1: but I couldn't support him because of what happened in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty, but I became I guess you could say
Speaker 1: sympathetic to the guy all the way back in twenty
Speaker 1: fifteen sixteen. Because of this, you guys talked about the
Speaker 1: Russia hoax, non.
Speaker 8: The FBI was investigating it.
Speaker 1: The FBI was investigating it. So we recovered that.
Speaker 9: And so you took the words of unnamed FBI agents
Speaker 9: and put them on your network as if.
Speaker 1: They were the gospel truth. You did it again and again.
Speaker 1: A view of your network would have believed that Donald
Speaker 1: Trump and Vladimir Putin conspired in twenty sixteen. That was totally,
Speaker 1: im preposterously false. Now, well, that's what you just said
Speaker 1: is false.
Speaker 8: And Trump has gone to quote extraordinary lengths to keep
Speaker 8: specifics about his meetings with Russian President Vladimir Putin secret,
Speaker 8: even keeping them from top members of his own administration.
Speaker 8: Take a listen to how President Trump responded Saturday night
Speaker 8: when asked directly if he has ever worked for Russia.
Speaker 6: I think it's the most insulting thing I've ever been asked.
Speaker 6: I think it's the most insulting article I've ever had written.
Speaker 8: The President did not directly answer the question. It's a
Speaker 8: stunning turn of events. Do you think the President of
Speaker 8: the United States ever worked on behalf of the Russians
Speaker 8: against American interests?
Speaker 1: Do you think that maybe he worked for Russia against
Speaker 1: American interests? I mean, you could tell the framing there.
Speaker 1: Talk about a leading question and really it's not about
Speaker 1: leading the guest whoever he was talking to, It's about
Speaker 1: leading the audience. They want the audience to believe that,
Speaker 1: in fact, Donald Trump was a traitor to the United
Speaker 1: States of America. Now I'm not a huge Trump fan.
Speaker 1: I think that a lot of what he did in
Speaker 1: his first term was not great, particularly the year twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: which I don't need to detail to you. Guys, you're
Speaker 1: well aware, especially if you've been watching me since back then.
Speaker 1: I couldn't be more upset about what happened there. But
Speaker 1: when I started to become sympathetic to Trump was when
Speaker 1: I first realized that the Russian collusion narrative was bunk.
Speaker 1: I assumed it was bunk all the way back in
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen, but I knew it was bunk a couple
Speaker 1: of years after that, once we really understood where the
Speaker 1: Steele dossier had arisen, that in fact it was a
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton campaign funded op. And then the burying of
Speaker 1: Hunter's laptop and the lead up to the twenty twenty election.
Speaker 1: It was really unbelievable what they did there. I was
Speaker 1: on Twitter very heavily at that time. That was basically
Speaker 1: the first time I really had started to use it heavily,
Speaker 1: and I remember that story being treated in a way
Speaker 1: that I had never seen before, that you could not
Speaker 1: share it in DMS, even it was completely obliterated from
Speaker 1: the Internet. It was scary, Honestly, it was scary. And
Speaker 1: we find out later on, as I proved to you
Speaker 1: guys in last week's episode, that in fact, it was
Speaker 1: Antony Blinken of the State Department Fame, who was responsible
Speaker 1: for instructing Mike Morrell of the CIA to have fifty
Speaker 1: one active and former intelligence agents sign on to that letter,
Speaker 1: saying that it had all of the hallmarks of Russian disinformation.
Speaker 1: So it was Russian collusion two point zero. But in fact,
Speaker 1: you know, they were the ones that were colluding anyway,
Speaker 1: sitting out aside, what I realized as I watch all
Speaker 1: this stuff is well one, I think that Trump's presidency
Speaker 1: was better than Joe Biden. I think that he's done it.
Speaker 1: He did it better job. Aside from his catastrophic mistakes
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty, which were catastrophic broadly, his policies were
Speaker 1: more in alignment with my preferences. They weren't great. He
Speaker 1: did cut taxes, he did deregulate a bunch of industries,
Speaker 1: which I really appreciated, and I think it was healthy
Speaker 1: and very necessary. On the inverse that you have the
Speaker 1: deiesg framework that's being pushed very heavily by the opposition party,
Speaker 1: and I hate that, and I think it's really the
Speaker 1: bane of our country's existence and it has to be
Speaker 1: fought back against very aggressively. On top of that, I
Speaker 1: think that the Biden Harris regime has got us as
Speaker 1: close to World War three as we've ever been closer
Speaker 1: than we were in the nineteen eighties, if you can
Speaker 1: believe it, and I believe it. I genuinely believe that.
Speaker 1: I believe we have never been closer to World War
Speaker 1: three aka nuclear war in my entire life. And that
Speaker 1: has to be like, whoever's in power now has to lose.
Speaker 1: If that's the paradigm, because let's be honest, if new
Speaker 1: US fly, none of this bullshit matters. Culture war doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: Trump's rallies don't matter, Biden Biden's policies don't matter, Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris's out nothing matters if nukes fly, So that has
Speaker 1: to be fought. Trump seems to be the one who
Speaker 1: is most open to de escalating the situation with Vladimir Putin.
Speaker 1: I think that's vitally necessary. I think that's very much
Speaker 1: in alignment with libertarian values. He's also promised to free
Speaker 1: ross olbrig He's promised a bunch of libertarian things, and
Speaker 1: he's also been talking very openly about libertarian ideas, which
Speaker 1: are despite the fact that I don't think he'll actually
Speaker 1: do these things, he is popularizing some very libertarian, very
Speaker 1: aggressively libertarian ideas. Like Jade Vance just talked about how
Speaker 1: he's coming around to the idea that the Federal Reserve
Speaker 1: is actually the bane of our financial existence. That's huge progress.
Speaker 1: He had Trump while he was on with Joe Rogan
Speaker 1: talking about abolishing the income tax and shifting to an
Speaker 1: entirely tear if based funding mechanism for the federal government. Now,
Speaker 1: I'll be honest, don't think he's going to do it.
Speaker 1: I also don't think that financially you could get away
Speaker 1: with that. I don't think you could ever collect enough
Speaker 1: tariffs to make up for the size of the federal
Speaker 1: government as it is today. However, in the late eighteen hundreds,
Speaker 1: America was funded exclusively from tariffs because they didn't have
Speaker 1: an income text because that didn't come around until nineteen thirteen,
Speaker 1: as I'm sure all of you know. So I would
Speaker 1: love for us to get back to that. I think
Speaker 1: that would be highly preferable. It's still not perfectly in
Speaker 1: alignment with libertarian ideology. Obviously we would rather there be
Speaker 1: even less government than that, but that would be a
Speaker 1: huge step in the right direction, and I think we
Speaker 1: can all admit that. So in terms of actual promises
Speaker 1: that I think are actionable, that I think he will
Speaker 1: avoid World War three, and I think that he will
Speaker 1: free Ross Olbricht and a handful of other promises that
Speaker 1: he's made. I think he'll put a libertarian in his cabinet.
Speaker 1: Those things alone would make him the best president in
Speaker 1: my life time. It would like irrefutably. So I think
Speaker 1: that those things probably will happen. So it makes it
Speaker 1: hard for me not to support him. And what I
Speaker 1: kept thinking to myself is this today, I want to
Speaker 1: tell you about our sponsor monetary medals. Gold prices have
Speaker 1: been breaking all time highs in twenty twenty four, and
Speaker 1: now you can get your goal to work for you,
Speaker 1: generating interest income every month paid an additional ounces of
Speaker 1: physical gold. You can earn up to five percent on
Speaker 1: your gold and silver and their lease offerings, and Accredit
Speaker 1: investors can earn double digit returns in their bond offerings. Again,
Speaker 1: all the interest is paid in ounces, which are stored
Speaker 1: for free on your behalf. So if you're tired of
Speaker 1: your golden server collecting dust at home, or worse, racking
Speaker 1: up fees having your metal professionally stored, check out Monetary
Speaker 1: dash metals dot com slash lockdown to learn how you
Speaker 1: can start putting your metal to work today. Again, that's
Speaker 1: Monetary dash Metals dot com slash lockdown. Well, one, you
Speaker 1: have everyone that hates me hates him. This has been
Speaker 1: a factor that a lot of his supporters saying forever
Speaker 1: is that well, academia and the political elite, and Hollywood
Speaker 1: and the media, they all hate him. They all hate us,
Speaker 1: Therefore he's our guy. I don't think that's a good
Speaker 1: enough reason to vote for him, but I do think
Speaker 1: that that's evidence that he might not be as bad
Speaker 1: as you're being told. But I think what really pushed
Speaker 1: me over the edge is I kept thinking to myself, like, man,
Speaker 1: I really hope Kamala Harris loses. I just kept saying
Speaker 1: that over and over again. I kept thinking it day
Speaker 1: in and day out, and I was like, Oh, I
Speaker 1: could actually do something about that. I could actually throw
Speaker 1: my hat in the ring. With whatever limited influence I have,
Speaker 1: I feel like I've already extracted as much as I
Speaker 1: possibly can, or the libertarian movement has extracted it as
Speaker 1: much as we possibly could from a second Trump presidency.
Speaker 1: Do I want to see what that could be? Do
Speaker 1: I want to see what it actually amounts to. Would
Speaker 1: it be to our benefit? Does that advance liberty in
Speaker 1: some way? Does it give us the best hope of
Speaker 1: advancing liberty? Let me be very clear, I'm not being
Speaker 1: naive about this. Trump could get in there and he
Speaker 1: could declare war on Iran on day two. I don't know.
Speaker 1: There's no nobody knows, Okay, so we're all taking our
Speaker 1: best guess here. But I think that based off of
Speaker 1: all of the people I've been around that are in
Speaker 1: his orbit, spending so much time with Vivek and other people,
Speaker 1: I tend to believe that he is genuinely being influenced
Speaker 1: deeply by libertarian ideas. That does not mean he will
Speaker 1: govern as a strict libertarian. I don't think he'll even
Speaker 1: come close to that. But I think that he will
Speaker 1: advance liberty or at least not detract from liberty as
Speaker 1: aggressively as Kamala Harris's presidency absolutely one hundred percent would.
Speaker 1: And I kept thinking to myself, Man, I hope she loses. Well,
Speaker 1: maybe I should fucking get off the sideline and actually
Speaker 1: say something about it. As you know, statistically, one vote
Speaker 1: ain't gonna make a fucking lick a difference, but I
Speaker 1: have some influence. Maybe if I get out there and
Speaker 1: I say that, and it inspires a handful of other
Speaker 1: libertarian leadership to come out there and say the same thing.
Speaker 1: Dave front ran me, by the way, by about twenty
Speaker 1: four hours. I had this thread drafted where I was
Speaker 1: gonna send it out, and Dave puts out this episode
Speaker 1: where he just kind of flippantly says, man, I fucking
Speaker 1: hate Kamala Hair. She Dick Cheney endorsed this fucking lunatic. Like,
Speaker 1: I just hope she loses. You know what, I'm probably
Speaker 1: gonna vote for for uh Trump. I was like, damn it,
Speaker 1: they beat me to it. Anyways, I'm glad. I'm glad
Speaker 1: that he's seeing things the same way I am. But
Speaker 1: I just kept thinking to myself, like, man, like, we
Speaker 1: need this lady to lose, and it's not. Again, it's
Speaker 1: not about her, okay, it's not about Kamala Harris. She
Speaker 1: is not the decision maker. She's not the decider, the
Speaker 1: great decider. It's not her beliefs. I'm not even sure
Speaker 1: what this lady believes. I think she's probably a communist,
Speaker 1: but that's not really relevant. It's about the power structure
Speaker 1: and her being their chosen puppet. They ousted Joe Biden
Speaker 1: to put in this lady. They replaced a brain dead
Speaker 1: guy with her because he couldn't get the job done
Speaker 1: anymore to their satisfaction, so they replaced a brain dead
Speaker 1: dude with her. She is as empty a vessel as
Speaker 1: there has ever been. She is just a pure conduit
Speaker 1: for the existing power structure. The existing power structure which,
Speaker 1: in my opinion, has taken multiple runs at Donald Trump's life,
Speaker 1: that has lied to the FISA Court via the FBI
Speaker 1: in order to spy on his campaign before he was
Speaker 1: even the President of the United States. A power structure
Speaker 1: which has already attempted to cool him multiple times, attempted
Speaker 1: to impeach him multiple times, an existing power structure which
Speaker 1: has described the American people as radicals and potential domestic
Speaker 1: terrorists and really the enemies within. That's how they view us. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's real. That's who and what she represents. That is,
Speaker 1: in fact what I want to see defeated. Now, does
Speaker 1: Donald Trump thoroughly defeat that. No, they will not disappear
Speaker 1: because he's victorious. They will still be there for sure
Speaker 1: for quite some time. This is not some celebration. This
Speaker 1: is an opening salvo. This is an opportunity for at
Speaker 1: least some breathing room at least to see to make
Speaker 1: them reassess and reorient and change their game plans. Because
Speaker 1: I'll tell you what I think. I think if Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris is victorious, I think that they go ham in
Speaker 1: her first term because she is not going to be
Speaker 1: a popular president anyways. And after they have finally resoundingly
Speaker 1: defeated Donald Trump, who's already in his late seventies and
Speaker 1: almost certainly wouldn't be able to run again four years
Speaker 1: from now, they will do everything in their power to
Speaker 1: fortify for the next go And I don't think that
Speaker 1: just comes down to November fifth of twenty twenty eight.
Speaker 1: I think that comes down to how many political dissidents
Speaker 1: can we lock up, how much additional censorship can we
Speaker 1: get implemented in big tech arena to censor and stop
Speaker 1: these people from telling the truth about us. They realize
Speaker 1: that they are on the ropes. Do you want to
Speaker 1: let them off the ropes? I don't. I think it's
Speaker 1: very dangerous to let them off the ropes, And as
Speaker 1: far as I can tell, Donald Trump is my best
Speaker 1: chance of keeping them on the ropes in the corner
Speaker 1: fending for their lives. Now, that's a preferable circumstance, but
Speaker 1: it isn't an ideal one. It's still not knocking out
Speaker 1: your opponent. They are still fighting viciously, and a caged animal,
Speaker 1: a cornered animal, is an extraordinarily dangerous one. And I
Speaker 1: think that's what we're gonna witness next, is that as
Speaker 1: they realize if these betting markets are correct, and in fact,
Speaker 1: Trump is a sixty two two percent favorite to win,
Speaker 1: which I tend to believe, I don't know for sure.
Speaker 1: I expect really dramatic maneuvers allah the Summer of Love
Speaker 1: of twenty twenty, where yes, we had lockdowns, we had
Speaker 1: the obviously the pandemic, we have lockdowns, we have the
Speaker 1: entire BLM riot season that goes crazy. In my opinion,
Speaker 1: what we live through, as I've demonstrated in years past,
Speaker 1: I genuinely believe that we were living through what amounts
Speaker 1: to a CIA fomented color revolution done domestically thanks to
Speaker 1: the fact that they basically legalized domestic propaganda through the
Speaker 1: Smith Monetization Act of twenty twelve. So I think that's
Speaker 1: what we saw in twenty twenty. I think that it
Speaker 1: was utilized to successfully oust Donald Trump from power, and
Speaker 1: in fact, some would say Coop, I can't prove that,
Speaker 1: so I won't say that. And I think that if
Speaker 1: Trump wins on November fifth, it's highly probable that we
Speaker 1: will see that type of stuff again. You will see
Speaker 1: very aggressive propaganda to get people radicalized and in the streets,
Speaker 1: and a justification to then refuse to certify Donald Trump's
Speaker 1: victory come January sixth of twenty twenty five, which would
Speaker 1: be the irony of all ironies, as they have described
Speaker 1: January twenty sixth of twenty twenty one as an insurrection
Speaker 1: and an attempt to overturn democracy and blah blah, blah,
Speaker 1: they will do it anyways, that's my fear. I can't
Speaker 1: say for sure that's what's going to happen, but I'm
Speaker 1: just telling you, based off of my analysis of seeing
Speaker 1: what they do through all of these other ops that
Speaker 1: have been ran, that it's highly likely that's what we're
Speaker 1: coming up against. And unfortunately a friend of mine, Mike Bens, agrees.
Speaker 10: It's necessary, but it's not sufficient because what can be
Speaker 10: put into the Constitution can slip away from you very quickly.
Speaker 10: And the greatest example going on right now before our
Speaker 10: very eyes is section three of the fourteenth Amendment, which
Speaker 10: they're just disappearing with the magic wand as if it
Speaker 10: doesn't exist, even though it could not be clearer what
Speaker 10: it's stating. And so you know, they want to kick
Speaker 10: it to Congress. So it's going to be up to
Speaker 10: us on January sixth, twenty twenty five, to tell the
Speaker 10: rampaging Trump mobs that he's disqualified and then we need
Speaker 10: bodyguards for everybody in civil war conditions.
Speaker 9: So if you go to my x handle and you
Speaker 9: type in provoke breakdown, you're going to see that he referenced. Basically,
Speaker 9: they're going to provoke a breakdown on January sixth. Now,
Speaker 9: this is very interesting.
Speaker 1: So here you go.
Speaker 9: I think this is one right clear Trump win.
Speaker 1: This this is the scenario.
Speaker 9: Now if you go to the next screenshot, you'll see
Speaker 9: what it says there in yellow highlights with the with
Speaker 9: the highlight with the red highlight. And this was in
Speaker 9: June twenty twenty, being organized by military intelligence, State Department,
Speaker 9: and high level political operatives from both sides of the aisle.
Speaker 9: Again both the former heads of the of the both
Speaker 9: major political art parties who were both anti Trump, and
Speaker 9: one of the most consequential moves in their wargame for
Speaker 9: how to make sure Biden was the was inaugurated even
Speaker 9: if Trump was elected, was that Team Biden roleplay by
Speaker 9: John Nilliss than John Podesta, who had then occupy this
Speaker 9: very senior slot in the Biden administration White House. One
Speaker 9: of those consequential moves is that Team Biden on January
Speaker 9: sixth provoked a breakdown in the Joint Session of Congress
Speaker 9: by getting the House of Representatives to agree to award
Speaker 9: the presidency to Biden based on the alternative pro Biden
Speaker 9: submissions sent by pro pro Biden governors. This is what
Speaker 9: they're planning to do. They're going to make the argument
Speaker 9: that Donald Trump is disqualified under the fourteenth Amendment because
Speaker 9: of January sixth.
Speaker 4: Not going to work because Supreme Court he's got it, right,
Speaker 4: is it? What five to four right now or six
Speaker 4: to three? I don't know what the This is not
Speaker 4: going to be done without Supreme Court saying relaxed, guys,
Speaker 4: you're acting a little bit out of control.
Speaker 1: He's the president. Go cry a little bit, then you'll
Speaker 1: get over it.
Speaker 9: Well, two things on that. One is, remember it was
Speaker 9: this Supreme Court which voted seven to two not to
Speaker 9: not to actually hear Trump's questions about the last election
Speaker 9: about election fraud.
Speaker 1: So what Jamie Reskin is saying there, he's a congressional
Speaker 1: member from I think Maryland, serves on the I think
Speaker 1: he made chair actually the House Oversight Committee. So a
Speaker 1: powerful congressional representative to be talking like this is very dangerous.
Speaker 1: The reason it gives me pause or concern is that
Speaker 1: under the fourteenth Amendment, it says that it banned those
Speaker 1: who engaged in insurrection against the United States from holding
Speaker 1: any civil military elected office without the approval of two
Speaker 1: thirds of the House and Senate. So they're trying to
Speaker 1: use some civil war type of legalese to essentially keep
Speaker 1: Trump from taking office even if he wins the election,
Speaker 1: and I would be surprised. I wouldn't be surprised, I
Speaker 1: should say, if they don't try that in the twenty
Speaker 1: third hour, right before he's supposed to be or the
Speaker 1: election results are supposed to be certified on January sixth
Speaker 1: of twenty twenty five, be the irony of all ironies
Speaker 1: that the Party of Defending Democracy would then be engaging
Speaker 1: in insurrection, as they've described it themselves. So I'm not
Speaker 1: saying that's going to happen to I don't know. Perhaps
Speaker 1: Trump has in fact sold out entirely and he's working
Speaker 1: at their behest. You never know, but I find that
Speaker 1: hard to believe. I think that the panic with which
Speaker 1: they are approaching this election outcome or this election result
Speaker 1: tells me that he has still not bent the knee
Speaker 1: entirely to their will, and therefore they are doing everything
Speaker 1: in their power to make Kamala Harris win. Now, this
Speaker 1: is assuming that he even gets to the election, much
Speaker 1: less from the election to election day. This is assuming
Speaker 1: that the election is legit and that he is victorious.
Speaker 1: I don't know if that'll happen either. And then it's
Speaker 1: also assuming that they pull off this maneuver at the
Speaker 1: twenty third hour to try and prevent him from taking
Speaker 1: power once again. I don't know if any of those
Speaker 1: things will happen. I can't know. I don't have a
Speaker 1: crystal ball here. I'm just telling you that is my
Speaker 1: concern is that if the trend over the past eight
Speaker 1: years persists, that's what we should expect to see now.
Speaker 1: I hope that the trend is and I hope that
Speaker 1: they realize that they've pushed too far and they will
Speaker 1: just go back to the drawing board and they will
Speaker 1: lick their wounds and they will accept defeat. But I
Speaker 1: have not seen them to be those types of characters
Speaker 1: in recent memory, so I'm not banking on that. I
Speaker 1: would I would bet against it. In fact, I think
Speaker 1: that it's very likely that they will do whatever they
Speaker 1: possibly can, including starting a war with iron or any
Speaker 1: other crazy badness, to try and prevent this guy from
Speaker 1: taking power again. So stay frosty.
Speaker 11: I don't know if i'd be sober if the stuff
Speaker 11: weren't killing people. To be honest with you, I know
Speaker 11: that it's sad to say, but that keeps me out
Speaker 11: of the risk of it. You know, it just makes
Speaker 11: it too, makes a little scarier. Yeah, that's the thing.
Speaker 11: It makes it scarier. But it's also sad that somebody,
Speaker 11: I mean, this is ridiculous to say, probably that somebody
Speaker 11: can't you know, you can't even do cocaine in this
Speaker 11: country anymore, you know, And that seemed like a crazy
Speaker 11: thing to say. And don't say it. Don't say that,
Speaker 11: but I said it. But but yeah, but don't say
Speaker 11: that anymore.
Speaker 9: I'm gonna steal that line after the election that way,
Speaker 9: and I.
Speaker 1: I don't know win first, I've fortunate getting back into
Speaker 1: the humorous swing of things here. That was obviously JD
Speaker 1: vance on with THEO Vaughn a couple of days ago.
Speaker 1: THEO just had JD dying laughing for like the entire
Speaker 1: hour long interview. Theo's one of my favorite comics, and
Speaker 1: he's an absolutely hilarious person also a good person, and
Speaker 1: I just think that this is a much more healthy discourse.
Speaker 1: This is actually the country that I appreciate and loved
Speaker 1: once upon a time, one that would say inappropriate things
Speaker 1: and we could laugh at each other's differences and that
Speaker 1: that would actually bring us closer together, not this forced
Speaker 1: integration nonsense that they've been pushing for the past fifteen
Speaker 1: years that have actually divided us significantly. I think that
Speaker 1: the nineteen nineties kind of classical liberal version of wokeness
Speaker 1: was far, far preferable to the current iteration. First off,
Speaker 1: I'd like to give sincere credit to both Donald Trump
Speaker 1: and JD. Vance and Vivek and RFK Junior and basically
Speaker 1: everyone in the MAGA world now because they have been
Speaker 1: completely unafraid to do totally unscripted long form podcasts over
Speaker 1: and over and over again. For a year plus now,
Speaker 1: most of them have been doing this consistently, and I
Speaker 1: think that it has been one of the healthiest revelations
Speaker 1: of this election season. And I hope that it means
Speaker 1: that they're going to be victorious too, because that means
Speaker 1: that trend will stay intact. I think it's a much
Speaker 1: better format for actually figuring out who people are, what
Speaker 1: they believe, who they are deep down. You can't maintain
Speaker 1: the facade for three hours, like if you watched Trump
Speaker 1: on Rogan, that's who the guy is, Like, it couldn't
Speaker 1: be more obvious if you didn't believe. You know, if
Speaker 1: you thought he was maintaining some sort of persona through
Speaker 1: all of the other years you've been watching this guy,
Speaker 1: No he's not. It's not a persona. I mean, his
Speaker 1: personality is so like unbelievable that it feels like it
Speaker 1: must be. But no, that's actually who Trump is. I
Speaker 1: know it's hard to believe.
Speaker 6: Do me a favorite. Do you know Elon Muskyz He
Speaker 6: endorsed me by the way. He gave me the nicest
Speaker 6: endorsement too, the tough he said, the country's going to fail.
Speaker 6: You should do the same thing, Joe, because you cannot
Speaker 6: be voting for Kamala Kamala. You're not a Kamala person.
Speaker 6: I know you. I've watched you. I know him better
Speaker 6: than he is. You know what, without speaking to you,
Speaker 6: I think I know you, maybe almost as well as
Speaker 6: your wife. I have watched you for so many years.
Speaker 6: You're not a Kamala person. You're a Kabibe person, but
Speaker 6: you're not a Commala person.
Speaker 1: But I've got to know j d Vance alot better
Speaker 1: because of these long form podcasts that he's been doing.
Speaker 1: And I feel that way about Vavek and all these
Speaker 1: other guys. RFK Junior as well. First, it's it's very healthy,
Speaker 1: it's good for the American people to get to know
Speaker 1: these people better. But also on the inverse that I
Speaker 1: think it's really damning against the people that are either
Speaker 1: unwilling or incapable of doing it themselves, which is Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris and Joe Biden. You know, Joe Biden just because
Speaker 1: he became incapable of speaking in Kamala Harris, who never
Speaker 1: learn that skill in the first place. More macro analysis
Speaker 1: of this, I'm really really hopeful that all of these
Speaker 1: podcasts that they've been doing, not all of them, but
Speaker 1: a huge, huge percentage of them. I mean, for instance,
Speaker 1: Tony Hinchcliffe, like one of the jokes he made in
Speaker 1: Madison Square Garden was like, we need to stop funding
Speaker 1: these wars and huge applause, very non interventionist perspective.
Speaker 3: Ukraine versus Russia, Israel, it's like bad soccer games. Who
Speaker 3: even cares?
Speaker 1: What are we doing?
Speaker 3: Why is our money involved in these wars? When it
Speaker 3: comes to Israel and Palestine, we're all thinking the same thing.
Speaker 3: Settle your stuff already, best out of three rock paper scissors.
Speaker 3: You know, the Palestinians are gonna throw rock every time.
Speaker 3: But you also know the Jews have a hard time
Speaker 3: throwing that paper.
Speaker 1: You know what I'm saying. Today's episode is once again
Speaker 1: brought to you by our friends over at Phoenix ammo
Speaker 1: dot com. Phoenix Ammunition is the premier supplier to the
Speaker 1: militia industrial complex. That's you, bitch, that's you. They wrote
Speaker 1: the Declaration of Independence, they wrote the Bill of Rights
Speaker 1: for you, about you, about your god given goddamn rights,
Speaker 1: and Phoenix Sammo helps you keep them alive. That's the facts.
Speaker 1: That's how it works. I know it's kind of a bomber.
Speaker 1: I wish someone else would do it. No, it's up
Speaker 1: to you and I go to Phoenix ammo dot com.
Speaker 1: You ain't got to enter a promo cod because they
Speaker 1: don't give a fuck about that. They're just savages that
Speaker 1: sponsor the show, and they're savages that supply some of
Speaker 1: the greatest ammunition in the entire fucking world straight to you.
Speaker 1: Consumer driven, American built, fantastic company, great great guys. Phoenix
Speaker 1: Amo over on x if you want to follow them,
Speaker 1: Phoenix ammo dot com. If you're running low, the only
Speaker 1: place to go is Phoenix ammo dot com I think
Speaker 1: Tony's mentioned in the past being fairly libertarian. Tim Dillon
Speaker 1: had on JD Vance just yesterday as well, and they
Speaker 1: were talking about libertarianism. And Tim Dillon has described himself
Speaker 1: as as basically a libertarian many times too. You got
Speaker 1: Rogan who's voted for Ron Pohl multiple times and has
Speaker 1: described himself as basically a libertarian as well, you know,
Speaker 1: more left leaning libertarian, but more libertarian. And Theovaughn, I
Speaker 1: think is quite evidently a libertarian too, doesn't like the wars,
Speaker 1: doesn't really want people thrown in prison for drugs and
Speaker 1: things of that nature, like all of these guys. And
Speaker 1: I know you could, like, if you're not a fan
Speaker 1: of these people, if you don't know who I'm talking about,
Speaker 1: let me just explain why I think this is such
Speaker 1: a big deal. These guys have the largest independent platforms
Speaker 1: in America, like Joe Rogan has the largest, but Theovughn enormous,
Speaker 1: Tony Hinchcliffe enormous, Tim Dillon enormous, like all down the line.
Speaker 1: Sam Tripley, who was just on with Rogan right before
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, also describes himself as a libertarian very often.
Speaker 1: My point is, like the Libertarians have failed to engage
Speaker 1: in the culture war forever, and we've barely even engaged
Speaker 1: in the political arena, Like we've just been basically trounced
Speaker 1: in every area of our lives. And what I'm seeing
Speaker 1: is that people that don't necessarily call themselves libertarian very
Speaker 1: often are in fact moving the ball down the field
Speaker 1: in both the political and cultural arena by doing these podcasts,
Speaker 1: these comedians. I know it sounds ridiculous for me to
Speaker 1: make this claim, but I genuinely believe it. I genuinely
Speaker 1: believe that they are changing the culture right in front
Speaker 1: of us, and I don't think people are paying enough
Speaker 1: attention to it, and I don't think people realize what
Speaker 1: a big deal it is and what enormous audiences that
Speaker 1: these guys bring in. Now, there's a lot of overlap
Speaker 1: because most of these guys are in the rogan ecosystem,
Speaker 1: and I'm sure a lot of the fans are fans
Speaker 1: of all of these guys. So perhaps the reach isn't
Speaker 1: as big as I'm thinking it might be, but it's
Speaker 1: still a few percent of the country, at least like
Speaker 1: five ten percent of the country. Like it's bigger than
Speaker 1: libertarians it's bigger than Ron Paul when you put it
Speaker 1: together cumulatively. So I think that this is real reason
Speaker 1: for optimism, and I hope that it ultimately ends up prevailing.
Speaker 1: If Donald Trump wins. That does not mean everything is fixed, Okay,
Speaker 1: it doesn't even necessarily mean that things will improve. I
Speaker 1: don't know, but I think that it's vitally important that
Speaker 1: when you have a already puppet replaced by another puppet
Speaker 1: that's put in a position to try and dominate, not
Speaker 1: just a guy who they've attempted to coop and kill
Speaker 1: and everything else multiple times, but also intended to dominate
Speaker 1: their political opposition. I'm talking about you and me that
Speaker 1: they have to suffer a defeat to and if they don't,
Speaker 1: then I think things get really hairy over the next
Speaker 1: four years. And that's assuming that we avoid World War three,
Speaker 1: because if we don't then it's over anyways. But assuming
Speaker 1: that Kamala Harris wins and avoids World War three, which
Speaker 1: is not a given, I still think that things would
Speaker 1: get dire in this country, and that political persecution and
Speaker 1: censorship and gun grabbing and all of those other things
Speaker 1: becomes really really dangerous. And I am still interested in
Speaker 1: peaceful resolution to what we're dealing with, and I think
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump gives us our best hope at that.
Speaker 1: So I am not going to compel any of you
Speaker 1: to go and cast your ballot for Donald Trump. I
Speaker 1: just want you to hear my opinion and then consider
Speaker 1: it for yourselves. If you still think that the libertarian
Speaker 1: candidate is more in alignment with your views, you have
Speaker 1: my blessing, not that you ever needed it in the
Speaker 1: first place. To me, if you're running as a libertarian yet,
Speaker 1: you gotta be perf You got to be great, because
Speaker 1: at the end of the day, what are we really
Speaker 1: asking libertarian voters to do. You're asking a libertarian to
Speaker 1: waste their vote because we're not gonna win. So if
Speaker 1: you're going to vote for a libertarian, they gotta be
Speaker 1: fucking great. You got to be sending a message that matters,
Speaker 1: and a messenger that matters. His message doesn't matter. He
Speaker 1: has avoided every opportunity to go on the largest platforms,
Speaker 1: from Part of the Problem with Dave Smith, to timcast Iro,
Speaker 1: with Tim Poole, to a bunch of others. I'm sure
Speaker 1: he was invited on. I haven't heard a fucking word
Speaker 1: from this guy in months. Nothing. I've seen him nowhere.
Speaker 1: I'm on the internet all the time. How have I
Speaker 1: not seen anything from this guy? It's crazy. This is
Speaker 1: a failing campaign, and I think it's equally important that
Speaker 1: you send a message to the party that we're not
Speaker 1: going to support garbage candidates like this, people who aren't
Speaker 1: prepared to actually go out and get our message out
Speaker 1: there and get a compelling message to the people. He's
Speaker 1: failed to deliver on both aspects. So in my opinion,
Speaker 1: he hasn't earned my vote, not that he ever wanted
Speaker 1: in the first place. It's clear he didn't, and that's
Speaker 1: fine he doesn't, Okay, But I'm not going to make
Speaker 1: an apology for not giving it to you now because
Speaker 1: you didn't want it in the first place. Okay, we're
Speaker 1: in mutual agreement. You didn't want it, I ain't gonna
Speaker 1: give it. Handshake, have a good day. So I think
Speaker 1: that's where I'm at with it, is that I think
Speaker 1: that if you're running, if you're going to vote for
Speaker 1: a libertay, they got to be great. He ain't. Donald
Speaker 1: Trump ain't great either, but he has the best chance
Speaker 1: to advance liberty in the next four years and he's
Speaker 1: got a chance to make the machine slow down, reorient
Speaker 1: show its hand a little bit better, give us more tells,
Speaker 1: more signals as to what we're up against. Like that,
Speaker 1: to me has been the greatest godsend of Trump's tenuere
Speaker 1: in American politics is that I did not know at
Speaker 1: all the extent to which the media. Like I knew,
Speaker 1: I was not a fan of any of these institutions,
Speaker 1: but I did not know the extent to which the
Speaker 1: media and Hollywood and the political elite all work in
Speaker 1: tandem with one another to essentially craft narratives and maintain
Speaker 1: like it's basically mind control, Like it's damn close. I
Speaker 1: didn't know that it was that extreme, Like I knew
Speaker 1: it was like surface level. Maybe I didn't know that
Speaker 1: you could get multiple social media companies in tandem to
Speaker 1: kick Alex Jones or Donald Trump, the President of the
Speaker 1: United States, off of social media. Did you know that, hi,
Speaker 1: Clint here, I didn't know that, Okay, call me naive.
Speaker 1: Didn't know. I didn't know that when the President of
Speaker 1: the United States orders a troop draw down in Syria,
Speaker 1: that they could reject it, that they could just say, sure,
Speaker 1: we did it, and then not and then no one
Speaker 1: pays any price for it. Didn't know that that was
Speaker 1: how it worked. Again, maybe I'm naive. Hi Clint here
Speaker 1: didn't know, had no idea. I didn't know that they
Speaker 1: would spy on a sitting president. I didn't know that
Speaker 1: they would, you know, essentially frame a president for treason.
Speaker 1: I knew that they would assassinate one thanks to JFK.
Speaker 1: But like I mean, Jesus Christ. So anyways, I think
Speaker 1: that the value of Trump is that he's demonstrated that
Speaker 1: He's demonstrated the depravity of the media in a way
Speaker 1: that's really profound. He's woken up so many people to
Speaker 1: how evil and psychotic these fucking people are. That's a
Speaker 1: huge benefit. And I think that those are all really
Speaker 1: big positives that I would like to see again. I
Speaker 1: would like to see more of it. I think that
Speaker 1: that takes us in a direction that's healthier than the
Speaker 1: direction that Kamala Harris would take us. And ultimately, at
Speaker 1: the end of the day, it's going to be a binary.
Speaker 1: It's going to be one or the other that go around.
Speaker 1: There's no doubt about it. The Libertarian Party will be
Speaker 1: lucky to get a half percent. Bull shouldn't you. So,
Speaker 1: if you're like me, and if you're thinking about if
Speaker 1: you're a parent, if you're thinking about having kids and
Speaker 1: settling down, and you're thinking about the future of this country,
Speaker 1: in the future of this planet, I think you'll probably
Speaker 1: come to the same conclusion I did, that this is
Speaker 1: the only rational pathway to take right now, that despite
Speaker 1: all of Donald Trump's pitfalls, despite the fact that just
Speaker 1: catastrophic mistakes in twenty twenty, despite the fact that many
Speaker 1: of the things he prints preaches today, I still disagree
Speaker 1: with this. Like just yesterday he floated out the idea,
Speaker 1: I'm going to propose that we put anybody that burns
Speaker 1: an American flag in jail for a year. What And
Speaker 1: then in like the fucking next breath, the guy says,
Speaker 1: I will never fail you. I'm gonna defend your First
Speaker 1: Amendment rights, your Second Amend rights. I'm like, hey, hey, hey,
Speaker 1: burning a fucking flag is part of the First Amendment,
Speaker 1: you dummy. So like, this guy is far from perfect,
Speaker 1: and I will never lie to you about that. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna be one hundred percent honest as I have always
Speaker 1: been about everything fucked up about Donald Trump. That ain't
Speaker 1: gonna change. But on November fucking fifth, I'm gonna go
Speaker 1: vote for the guy. I know. It's crazy. I'm as
Speaker 1: shocked as you are. Never would have thought it, especially
Speaker 1: after twenty twenty. I was so fucking pissed, and I
Speaker 1: still am. But it's just the only rational thing to
Speaker 1: do right now, it really, really is. I've thought about
Speaker 1: this ad nausea, like made myself sick thinking about this
Speaker 1: for months and months and months, and I've came to
Speaker 1: the conclusion that I have to do this, that it
Speaker 1: is the It is the only choice. It's the only choice.
Speaker 1: Either that or I stay home. And I just don't
Speaker 1: think that I want a bunch of lunatics that want
Speaker 1: to see me disarmed and imprisoned to be the ones
Speaker 1: casting votes as I sit there and go, I'm not
Speaker 1: even gonna say no. This is me saying no. I'm
Speaker 1: voting for Trump to say no, to say no to
Speaker 1: all of it, and we'll see, we'll see where the
Speaker 1: chips fall.
Speaker 11: I was in a meeting some guy of fish hook
Speaker 11: stuck in his freaking cheek really yeah, wow, yeah wow. Man,
Speaker 11: he had two weeks clean. Yeah, he'd either had a
Speaker 11: really bad night or really good night. It's just like,
Speaker 11: all right, dude, catch him, release, brother, catch him release.
Speaker 11: He probably had tried to come across the border. And
Speaker 11: I only say that because we had as on here
Speaker 11: and so we've learned a good bit about it. Every years, Okay,
Speaker 11: United Japan, Germany, Canada, Japan. Sweat Serlin, sweet Serlin.
Speaker 1: I can't see that.
Speaker 11: Which word of that comparable county average?
Speaker 1: You're screwing with me?
Speaker 11: Austria. Well, I think they misspelled it, dude, There's not
Speaker 11: that many zits in it.
Speaker 1: I'm not a doctor.
Speaker 9: I'm not telling If your doctor tells you to take
Speaker 9: those epic follow your doctor's advice, not you know what
Speaker 9: you're hearing.
Speaker 1: On a audiastic.
Speaker 6: I don't mind it.
Speaker 1: You know, that's the country that I remember, that's the
Speaker 1: country that I love, and that's the country that I
Speaker 1: hope we can get back to. Prayers for this nation
Speaker 1: from this agnostic prayers. Seriously, sincerely, Let's hope for a
Speaker 1: fiery but mostly peaceful future and mostly free future. We
Speaker 1: shall see. I'll catch you guys next time.
Speaker 12: I I'm gil Fulbright. The people who run my campaign,
Speaker 12: they've made this commercial and I'm in it. This campaign.
Speaker 4: It's not about me.
Speaker 12: It's about crafting a version of me that'll appeal to you.
Speaker 1: A version that visits.
Speaker 12: Random work sites with paid actors pointing at things. A
Speaker 12: version of me that doesn't find old people loathsome are pointless,
Speaker 12: has a conventionally attractive yet curiously still family. Listening to
Speaker 12: my constituents legislating These are things.
Speaker 4: I don't do.
Speaker 12: What I do is spend about seventy percent of my
Speaker 12: time raising funds for reelection. I do anything to stay
Speaker 12: in office. My name's gil Fulbright, but hell, I'll change
Speaker 12: my name to phil Goldbright or bill Fulbright or.
Speaker 4: Fill up my mouth with farts.
Speaker 1: These are the things that are important to.
Speaker 12: Me, and these are the fine people that finance my campaign. Now,
Speaker 12: in order to do these things, I have to stay
Speaker 12: in office, and stay in office, I have to keep
Speaker 12: these guys happy. Now, any of these things make these
Speaker 12: guys unhappy, well, my hands are tied. So come November,
Speaker 12: the choice is clear. Do you want another a spineless
Speaker 12: mouthpiece for special interest in lobbyists or a spiningest mouthpiece.
Speaker 1: For special interest in lobbyists.
Speaker 12: I'm filling my mouth with arts, and I approved this message.
Speaker 9: Welcome to when he locked down Pscana Park Home Deliberty
Speaker 9: and Company that's on hold.
Speaker 1: Where did it come from?
Speaker 4: And Bernsday