Speaker 1: There are some things that hold true. For instance, new
tech sucks munch at the time. Everybody knows that. Here's
another never engage in a land war in Asia during
the winter, right, nobody knows that ain't no pineapple belonging
on any pizza. Word of God is solid base on
which you should build a foundation, and complexity is the
tool of scoundrels. And Bill Gates he's not really concerned
about people making mistakes because he's the common core m
RNA guy.
Speaker 2: Right, Bill, what do you think that relationship is about?
I mean, why is he spent? Why is it that
so many people? I mean, it's unstided why people going
to Mariloko and spend time.
Speaker 1: With Donald Trump?
Speaker 2: But what do you think is you say, it's fascinating.
What do you think is the basis of that relationship
between Musk and Trump? I know that's a question for
Elon Musk, and I'll happily ask him if I ever
get the chance.
Speaker 3: You know, people in the private sector are often frustrated
by government, and of course government could be somewhat more efficient.
Then again, the government's not supposed to be the same
as the private sector, and so there's a you know,
a whole history of people from the private sector thinking
they can, you know, get government to be better, and
in many cases they they don't go about it in
the right way. And you know, government it's it's not
there's not many cases where somebody's actually, uh made it smaller.
So the deregulatory thing, you know, I think there's some uh,
you know, some merit there. But we're gonna have to
be careful. And you do worry when people are trying
to be so radical that they'll make they'll make mistakes.
Speaker 1: And it is to prove the points we bring in
our friend and brother Zach Abraham Chief and veznufsor Bower
Cuple Management. Think you got Almighty for Wise Council.
Speaker 4: Day, but Herman's show is disapproved. But Big Pharma Technicoreccy,
Tyre and Sabria from the high mountains of Free American.
Here's the Emerald City Exime Todd to her Man.
Speaker 1: Today is a day the Lord has made in These
are the times to which God has decided who shall live.
And we will start our discussion with our friend and brother,
Zach Abraham, Chief Investments for both Cupity Management welcome Zach
to a constitutional crisis country where brave judges are saving
us from an executive executive.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 5: Well, and then I was just talking to myself in
the break there. I thought we were on. What I
was telling you is my new intro. The way I'm
going to introduce myself from now on is I'm just
going to say, I am science.
Speaker 1: I am I am finance itself.
Speaker 5: Yes, when you're talking to me, you're talking to finances. Yeah.
How are we doing? How we doing?
Speaker 1: Man? I am I'm a part Art's giddy. If you're
watching the video, you can see that's because I've I've
given myself a concussion on above my frontal lobe at
the Tanning booth and you knock. I knocked myself joyful.
I'm post deliverance, and I've talked about that. I went
to a deliverance pastor. So the demons are less affecting me.
I love that I feel in the spirit. But I'm
watching and I want to explain to me and tell
me if this makes sense to you. President Trump is
the chief executive of the executive branch, duly elected. Even
the Democrats admit that he is the chief commander in
chief of the military, duly elected even the Democrats admit
that Congress votes on gobs of money, gives that money
to the executive branches the bureaucracies. Here's your budget. The
bureaucracies can make changes in that budget. You know, we
need to shift some daughters around and hire some people
in this area, but the chief executive can't. He's he's
not allowed to do that. So it has gotten so bizarre.
One of the latest things is a judge has told
the National Institute of Health, the CDC, and the FDA,
you have to put those websites back, the ones about
the gender madness. You have to put them back because
I a judge. I think this judge is in Massachusetts
or Rhode Island says. So what they're saying, and am
I ever stating this, they're saying to President Trump, you
can be the executive.
Speaker 5: You just can't executive, right, And so I think the
best way and feel free to color this, but I
think the best way, not assuming that your listeners don't
understand this, but I think the best way to think
about this and the best way to understand that executive
role in the way that was intended by the founders
is think of him as sort of like a CEO,
right Like, the CEO cannot go against what the board says.
But inside of that space, the CEO has a lot
of latitude. So to say that he can't take the helmet,
he actually is. Probably he's the only person legally that
they can, I believe, outside of a vote from Congress.
And I think that what you've got going on here
is just a lot of obfuscation and a lot of
just trying to throw sticks into the spokes. And you know,
you'd probably know better than I do. But I don't
think that there's any legal standing here. I mean, I
would assume that that just gets blown right out of
the water.
Speaker 1: I would hope so in the Supreme Court better because
if they don't, you're going to have a delegitimized judiciary
from the bottom one up. And it's it's what they've
said is, yeah, you elected this guy to run the
executive branch, and we decided he can't get right, don't
buy the voting.
Speaker 5: Right, and he has he has fairly unlimited power as
it relates to his implementation of existing law. Right Like,
that's sort of the letter of the law and kind
of the way the job reads. Right, If he decides
that that text or that part of the CDC website
is no longer acceptable. There is an anybody legally that
can override him, is there? I mean, there's nobody on
the other side of that decision.
Speaker 1: There's the whole thing. The buck stops here. He's ultimately
responsible for these organizations. Therefore he's ultimately able to bring
accountability to him. Here's what I think happened is Elon
accidentally cracked the code. Now that sounds weird because he's
an engineer and software guy and he understands code. He
accidentally cracked the code of corruption. There's a clarity in
your body, and it's very very clear, particularly from men
of any age. We want to have muscle, women too.
Mean percentage of muscle in your body is a great
predictor of your longevity and your health overall. If you
don't want to lose muscle, first step is to keep
the muscle you have. Mass signs from bioptimizers will help
you do that. There's a myth. The myth is that
protein builds muscle. It doesn't. Protein has to be broken
down into amino acids, specifically branchchain aminos. They build muscle.
That's what happens. Bioptimizers product mass in A side by
side test from Birch International University in Bosnia showed that
people who take mass times people like me, produce sixteen
hundred times more amino acids in their bodies than people
who don't take it, people maybe like you. At the
age of fifty eight, My body fat percentage is about
nine point nine percent, and my muscle's pretty high. And
I credit a lot of that to mass Simes and
of course working out and eating properly. Go to boptimizers
dot com slash Todd promo code todd get mass symes
at a ten percent discount and keep the muscle you
have and maybe even earn more muscle. Yeah, earn it.
Boptimizers dot com slash Todd promo code tod get ten
percent off all the products and subscribe to the products
you need. Just take that special hint. So here's here's
one of the codes. Say correct. First of all, there
is the open payment field. So the treasure pays twelve
million dollars for what we don't know. If you at
Bulwark Capital Management received a bill and it went to
your wife, she's a CFO, and it said remit twelve
million dollars too, or let's size it down one hundred
and twenty thousand here, here's the address. Would she just say, well,
I don't know what this is for, but I better
pay it. Or what might she come to you and say, hey, honey,
we have one hundred and twenty thousand dollars bill, but
it doesn't say what it's for, and then you'd probably say, well,
we better pay it. That's yeah, right, that's cracking the
code and coruption. How do you do corruption? You don't
make anybody say what they're buying.
Speaker 5: Right, right, right, And and there's so many soft parts
to this, right, which is influence that advis you in
an industry that maybe you're not corrupt at all. You know,
this is why the crackdown of people. If you're going
to regulate a certain industry, you should be able to
have a job there for so long. And if you
don't think this is what's going on, look, I think
this is really simple to understand. Right, any person, regardless
of political affiliation, that is paid attention to anything government
related for the last forty years knows that government spending
is completely out of act, that there's unbelievable amounts of
waste and fraud. And we all know this, right, and
yet when we finally get people looking into it, right,
there's uproar. It really is amazing to me how well
trained the left has got their constituency base. Right. You
finally have disinterested third parties, right, Musk isn't just look guys,
I you know there are people that say I have
bashed Musk in the past.
Speaker 1: As a vide I will again he's a transhumanist.
Speaker 5: Yeah, And but there is an Aukham's razor thing you
put in here, right, which is if you're telling me
that Musk is doing all this for greed as the
richest man in the world. When I consider the things
he's cutting and what he's attacking, I just see no
correlation there. There's just nothing that well, he's doing it
to get extra is what is he going to get
that he doesn't already have from Trump? That's that's the
other side of it, right. I'm not saying that a
ambition does isn't endless, and I'm not saying the Bill
gates the world don't exist. I'm just saying what you're doing,
if you're a mosque, what he's currently doing doesn't marry
up with the accusations that are getting levied against him.
It just doesn't make any sense exactly exactly. I think
you got to take it at face value at this point.
I just think that's where Auckham's razor points you, right, Like.
Speaker 1: Everybody in politics has some self interest, right, Okay, so
he's he may be an opportunist, and I want to
pay careful attention to that. He's got a ninety six
million dollar bed to buy or was it open aye?
Or yeah jet? That is my little word. You wrote
this on Twitter. All the chatter regarding USAID and all
this infobing public is really misleading. Another favorite trick of DC,
hence three thousand page legislation, is to drown out the
ugly truth under an ocean of bureaucratic vernacular and pork
barrel bs. Additionally, many of the this is key many
of the databases can't effectively navigate the data via keyword searches.
I believe just one of the USA D databases was
one point five terabytes. Certainly expert, but seeing multiple tweets
makes it sound as if a fourth grader could have
teased out this data. Not all the case if it
were It's yet another example how broken the MSM is
and how deeply derelict they've been in the duty to
hold power to account. And this is key here as well.
If you're setting up databases where you want to search
for spending for let's say DEI, Yeah, and forty percent
of the payment fields are left blank, good luck or
they call it special programs.
Speaker 5: Yeah. And the other part of this, too, which is
no news to you, is the complete flagrant spending that
that you've got spending in there that I don't think
can be described as anything other than seditious, Meaning that
when your own government is funding to the tune of
thirty six million dollars an organization who's express point and
purpose to exist is to basically undermine your legal system,
how is that not sedition? And it's like the worst
form of sedition, right, We're like we're cutting our throats
with our own knives, right right, Like it's it's just
it's perplexing to me. And when anybody, when anybody pushes
back against transparency or looking into that or whatever the
case may be, either they're just completely manipulated and and
and they've got like a you know, like a captive mindset, right,
there's gonna you know, just repeat anything. Uh, you know,
or they're part of the problem. Yes, I don't think
there's any way you can carve it up. And the
reason I stated it that way is because I was
hearing all these people going, oh, it's not a big deal.
This is so stupid. You know that that information's already
out there, and you go, guys, information being on a
public database that's one point seven terabytes, when when you don't,
you're not there's not even a keyword search function on
that database. That isn't just being out there. And second
of all, if it is just out there, what have
you been doing? Right? Why haven't you gone through it
as an agent of the press when they're uncovering these
are you telling me that these kinds of things aren't
even newsworthy. You just can't even track the narrative anymore.
Speaker 1: No, and you said this so well, they've got the
left so well trained. Reminds me of a Simpsons episode.
There was a time truly, we're Springfield's where they lived,
was overrun with snakes, and so Mayor Quimby came out,
we need to kill the snakes, kill the snakes, and
they had the townspeople with torches and kill the snakes.
Kill the snakes, and he gave the speech about how
evil the snakes are. And then Lisa Simpson gets on stage.
Stop stop, snakes are friends. They kill rats and mice
and vermin that bring disease, and she gives us some
passion speech, and all of a sudden, some towns personnails
save the snakes. And then Quipan's up there. I've said
for years, we need to save the snakes, the holy snakes.
And this is what they've done with corruption.
Speaker 5: Save the corruption.
Speaker 1: We're here to save the corruption.
Speaker 5: Like for instance, look, let's say let's see somebody on
the left would have won like whatever. I mean, nobody
on the left would have done this. But let's see
somebody on the left with a one, and they were
going through usaid like this. I'd be sitting there going, well,
it wasn't who I voted for, but good job.
Speaker 1: Uh yeah, right. And I always want to boil things
down to the real world. Okay, here's the real world. You, Zach,
are talking with twenty of your financial advisors, okay, and
you're going through a portfolio of a deer client, and
you actively manage all the portfolios you actively undertake a
risk management. Okay, so you're sitting there looking at a
spreadsheet and the client is let's say, twenty five percent
light in their portfolio, and you say, where'd that go?
And your financial advisor.
Speaker 5: Goes, I don't know, Yeah you didn't. I didn't go anywhere.
It's just gone, Yeah, that wouldn't that wouldn't go very well.
Speaker 1: How does that end? I mean, honestly, as the boss,
how does that conversation end without your guy with a
full on explanation or handcuffs?
Speaker 5: Yeah? Right, yeah, it's one of two right, Yeah, it's
one of two ways. And and and that's when you
get to this point. I don't really know what that means.
But when you get to the point where people are
uncovering things that now there's there's there's going to be
a process that these things have to go through to determine,
you know, what they are. Are they out and out fraud?
Are they exactly? So we got to go through a
process with all that. But how anybody like like, for instance,
you'd swear that they were unearthing documents about the DNC.
This isn't like opposition research, right, This is these are
things that are supposed to be serving all of us
with our money. Nobody doesn't benefit from what's currently going on.
And when you sit there and you have a party
that is supposedly progressive at all about human rights actively
trying to suppress transparency in any way, it's just so bizarre.
You look at it, go who's getting a raw deal here? Right? Like?
Who is this not serving? Right?
Speaker 1: But you look at the hypnotism and the magic word
hypnotism here and Trump has become a magic word, Orange
man bad has become a magic phrase. Now USAID, you
have people who never heard of USAID. And I'm talking
with people I've known for years in the East Coast,
getting phone calls from people. Can you explain this to me?
Speaker 5: Todd?
Speaker 1: How can you be against USAID? And my question is, hey,
can I pause for a second. I looked at your
Facebook pages now I'm scanning it back to twenty twelve.
You've never posted about USAID, right, what do you know
about it?
Speaker 3: Well?
Speaker 1: I know Trump's attacking it.
Speaker 5: Yeah, do you know what to do? You know what
they do?
Speaker 1: Right?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 5: Well, it's like, oh, and because because it's called U
s A, I d well, you know by that Levey
the Patriot Acts the best thing there was ever passed,
and it's it's it's holding up all over and I.
Speaker 1: Should just be able to small shop. I should be
able to get on the phone with my friends of
these cost and go. He's making America great again. Oh
oh that's okay.
Speaker 5: U s a I D. U s A I D
in all practical purposes, was a slush fund to buy
favors and and and a wield illegal influence, probably in
other elections. I mean that's probably.
Speaker 1: The probably r f K Junior was talking about the
five billion U s a I D spent to to
perform the coup in Ukraine.
Speaker 5: Right when it's thoughts for supporting transdent dance outings and
all that kind of stuff.
Speaker 1: So we need to talk about that because you had
a conversation with a trance radical on on the Twitter machine,
and I saw what she said. Every treat to what
she said, which she said made perfect sense. But I
want to run people through this because because there's an
aspect to this, and you are a very in tune man.
You are aware, you are not at all a naive man,
Zach Abraham. But there's something I need you to know
because you you identify some evil, but I want to
run you through the rest of the evil that you
don't see. On this as it relates to Jenner Jackers
who do with Zach Abraham, chief investment Officer Bullwark Capital Management.
There are people who have gone through surgery, had follow
up surgeries, follow up infections, and they never ever needed
the knife. There are people who've been conned into well,
if you don't do this, you're going to be bone
on bone for the rest of your life. That's not
always true. That is a structural bit of corruption in
the American medical system. And right now you'll hear people saying, well,
you can get the same stem cell treatments that you
do at Renew in the United States. No, you can't.
You can't. You can get minimally manipulated stem cells in
certain pockets of the United States, which is a very
different thing than what Renew does. Renews Wharton's jelly approach
to this is something where they deny they reject eighty
percent of all the stem cells they look at from
umbilical courts. They only accept twenty percent. From that twenty percent,
the very most healthy, most promising strains They then culture
those in their own lab so that the safest and
best stem cells culture to be used again. So one
million of them become thirty million of them. That's a
huge difference. They're also all in on alternative forms of treatment,
such as they've saved two of my listener desh viewers'
lives by pointing out to them they didn't know this.
You are going to have a massive heart attack in
the next couple months, maybe a couple weeks. That was
fixed the next day in a world class hospital. Don't
trust the American medical system. If you're being told it's
pills or surgery for the rest of your life, pause
and take It's not a risk at all. Go to
renew dot Healthcare and they'll tell you if they can
help you. Please tell them your part. The Todd Hermanshaw
family is renewed dot Healthcare. So let's run through this
conversation you had online. This this, You do the replay,
and then I'm going to fill in the pieces. Since
I've been burdened with having to study the gender cult for.
Speaker 5: A decade, well, I mean, I think we all know
how just yeah, I don't want to use the word
ridiculous because it's so in my it's's it's evil. It's
such an evil underpinning to it, right, But I mean
the logic behind it is just mindnumbingly stupid. But they
were going out. I think it was centered around this
Washington State politician who recently came out and said, if
you're old enough to be pregnant, you're old enough to
make all of your own medical decisions.
Speaker 1: Yep, Jamie Peterson, Seattle. And by the way, in Seattle,
that's not even a radical statement because you know people
in Seattle going thirteen? What about the nine year olds?
Speaker 5: Right? And you and I have said this for years,
and I think we used to get a lot of
a lot of weird looks. But underpinning this to me
has always I think that this whole movement was easier
to see coming, and it was easier to understand the
vectors of attack that they were taking on pushing this
ideology if you came into it with the with the
framework of this is a push toward normalizing pedophilia. If
you looked at it from that angle, it made a
lot of sense, right, and you can see the natural
progression to it. But I was getting in, I was
getting in this back and forth with somebody, and they
were they were trying to defend these sex change operations,
and they kept trying to flip the narrative over to
puberty blockers. And I said, why are you just focusing
on one part of that bill and it's the least
pernicious part. That bill also simultaneously gives the state the
right to seize the child, give them permanent medical sterilization
quote unquote, gender affirming care, pay for it all without
parental consent. Why are we talking about parents picking beta
blockers or puberty blocker. Excuse me? That's that is the
most Now we could have a whole discussion on that
as well. Right, I'm not at all saying I excuse
that or I'm fine with you, But I'm just saying,
isn't it interesting how you're trying to say you're having
a good faith debate, but you only want to talk
about ten or fifteen percent of that bill, which happens
to be the least controversial part. Why don't we talk
about it entirety? Right, didn't want to do that, And
she goes, well, how do you explain breast reductions? She goes,
you know, in a world where underage kids can have
bast reduction reductions. That's discrimination to kids that are trans
And I said, hold on a second. So partial breast
reductions which help girls compete better in athletics, blow back pain,
all these kinds of things. You're equating that, so the
improvement of their physical life, self esteem, athletic, but you're
comparing that to permanent medical sterilization. Yes, that's literally like saying,
how is getting a knee brace any different than a
knee replacement?
Speaker 1: Or or if no, let's go the full let's go
the full Measures Act. There's a condition called body integrity disorder.
It's REGULARI It's recognized in the DMS five, the Diagnostics
Statistical ds M five, Diagnostic Statistical Manual five. It's called
body integrity disorder. This is where people believe they were
born in the wrong body because they were either born
to be paralyzed and they're not, so they want to
be paralyzed. They want to have limbs removed. Most commonly
it's I think the left leg, but below the knee
they want it removed. So you would be comparing having
a wearing a knee brace for a little while to
having a healthy leg cut off right, And to answer
your question, yes, she's making that. This is you were
arguing with the person who calls themselves maryan librarian.
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 1: On Twitter. She also contends that you probably supported conversion
therapy for gay people too, so you might have supported
someone who says, you know what, I don't want this
same sex attraction. I think this is ungodly. Can I
talk to someone about it? And a thought this might say, sure,
let's like how that happen?
Speaker 5: But once look, I I just I can't stand it.
I have to step I have to always whenever I
cross paths with this, I've got to stomp it out.
Which is this the battle of non sequiturs? Right? Like,
I'm not going to allow you to obfuscate the whole
point of this conversation by throwing a complete non sequitur
in like you just did so, right.
Speaker 1: But she's doing this on purpose because she equates she
equates you blocking the mutilation of bodies to you not
letting kids talk about their feelings.
Speaker 5: Yeah, when when and and all I would respond to
her and say it I believe I did in some capacity.
Was when did the state ever mandate or force gender
or or conversion therapy? When when was there ever a
law that said we will sponsor gender or or or
excuse me, you know whatever that there version therapy, conversion
therapy without parental consent and do it with public funds.
When was that ever? When was that ever passed? And
why are we talking about it?
Speaker 1: The only reason I discussed is I had a friend
of mine who was molested by an older by an
older teen. He was a young teen. This guy was
legally an adult, and hey, it felt good. Sex feels good.
So my friend thought, well, that's it. I'm same sex
attracted and he'd never been before, and so he went
to therapy, and a therapist spent like two sessions with
him and goes, dude, it felt good. Like do you
find yourself walking around looking at men thinking they're pretty?
Speaker 5: No?
Speaker 1: Do you find yourself wanted to kiss men? Oh gosh no? Yeah, yeah,
guess what. You're not same sex attracted. This guy did
this to you. You were a kid, you were confused,
and sexual contact feels good, and he oh, okay, all right,
so then it's okay that that happens. No, it's not
because he abused you. It's not okay, And it doesn't
mean you're same sex attracted and it helped my friend
figure this out. Now let's get to the topic at hand.
So this technique she uses with you is she comes
along and says, and this is unquoting from your Twitter,
why is it okay to get breast reduction surgery as
a teen boy or girl as long as you're not
so called trance? A discrimination? Masculinizing surgery doesn't involve removing
the clitteris. It's also extremely rare and more rare in teens.
So much to get into details here, but let me
do this in just a second, Zach, Because this is
you are onto something that you wouldn't even even know
how close you are on something. Okay, My friend Tim
Krukshank was founder, is founder and CEO Bone Frog Coffee.
He's been deployed three separate times on our behalf as
a medic attached to the seal teams. He was also
a BUDS instructor. He sent guys into battle and trained
them to live, killed the enemy, to be sure, but
also to come home. Just recently, two of his team members,
one secured BUDS and is now there training to be
a Navy seal. The other has been invited and we'll
go through an initial process and then to buds, so
it has two people to hire. Tim hires veterans in
every ken. He works at veteran owned companies, and he
believes that we are in a golden age. To memorialize that,
Tim created a special roles of coffee with an utterly
brilliant and beautiful bag. Golden Age America once again under
the wings of a beautiful eagle, America once again with
the promise of becoming an actual, once again functioning republican
form of democracy, this time through President Trump's populism. Let's
not be confused. He's a populist and he's getting some
of the things done that have been waiting for years.
Think of what you've seen. The Department of Education is gone.
USAID was rolled under the State Department and therefore gone.
And that solves that with one activist judge, join Tim
in celebrating this. If you ever mind to celebrate this
moment in time, get great coffee from a legendary coffee maker.
Dave Stewart advises bone Frog and does some of the roasts.
He started Seattle's Best Coffee. So go to Bonefrog Coffee
dot com, slash todd u's promo code Todd to teen
percent affairs first purchase. Bonefrog Coffee dot com. Slash Todd
used promo code todd to get fifteen percent off subscription
coffee and encourage you to look at the merch Tim
Heats creates high class merchandise. Bonefrog Cooffee dot Com slash
Todd promo code Todd.
Speaker 5: So Zach.
Speaker 1: Back in the day when I started to get all
the reports of these families whose kids were getting gender
jacked and children's hospital was coming in and threatening to
steal the kids, and CPS reports and all that, I
learned that there was some very friendly autogidaphili x men
who are sexually aroused by pretending to be women and
forcing other people or conning them into believing. You know
what they did with their spare time. They bought ads online,
and they bought banner ads, and they targeted teen girls,
and they targeted them on Reddit and I can't remember
that blogging platform, which was pure unadulterated Hell. And you
know what you went, Alex, Yeah, yeah, Tumbler Tumblr, Tumbler,
Yeah yeah. They bought ads and those ads were pictures
of a girl looking very sad with really cartoonishly large breasts,
and the ads said things like sick of your sad sacks?
Are you sure you're born in the right body? And
when kids clicked on these ads, they were met with
the opportunity to chat with someone who is a gender expert,
and they would get an email and they would get
an opportunity to be involved in a group chat where
a man who was dressed as a woman would tell
them you're probably born in the wrong body. And you
know what the test was, do you like your breasts? No,
well then you're a boy, of course. So they sent
them a script. The script began with, you need to
start displaying the following symptoms around your family. You need
to stop the daily activities you've been in. You need
to change friend groups. You need to start wearing dark clothing.
You start putting on really dark makeup and big sweatshirt.
You need to be sullen all the time and tell
your parents display worry. And when your parents keep saying, hey,
talk to us, what's going on? Don't And then wait
till a good time and set the weakest parent down.
He the parent who's likely to give you what you want.
Guess what the script is if you're.
Speaker 5: A girl, I'm in the wrong body.
Speaker 1: Ye sorts as they say. Dad, Let me ask you
a question. If my breast were really hurting me, like
for sports, and it was really hurting my back and
just like I was getting a bunch of back pain
and arm pain and stuff, would you possibly ever consider
talking to a doctor about like a breast reduction?
Speaker 5: Geez?
Speaker 1: And the insidious thing is this you get a yeah,
well sure, honey, man, if a doctor said that, yeah,
I mean obviously I'd talked to him a health professional, Okay,
so you'd be open to that. They cracked the door
and a few weeks later they come in and go,
you know what, my breast really hurt me. I need
to see a doctor. I'm in my back and could
I just talk to doctor? And the kids know they've
already done the research, they know the language you speak
to the docs. And then the doctor is going to say,
in conjunction with the kid, well this is really just
another form of breast reduction. And you'd already talk to
your daughter and said you would consider breast reduction. This
is basically the same thing. We're just removing more tissue,
and believe it or not, there are parents who listen
to that and they don't understand it. They don't stop
think they're so terrified because this comes along with your
daughter's going to kill themselves if you can do that right,
And they forgetting the fact that those are organs. Those
aren't sacks of meat or sacks of fat. Those are organs.
They're responsible for passing on immunities to children. They have
the miraculous ability to do feed children. They contribute to
the health of the woman. Removing breast can contribute to
other forms of cancer. So, Zach, what you're encountering is
a woman using a script on you or I don't
know if it's a woman, but someone you know on
Twitter using a script on you that works with terrified
parents and confused teens. And we have judges saying to
the Trump administration, you have to put the gender ideology
stuff back on your websites. I know, it's unspeakable, unspeakable evil,
and you've got to put it back.
Speaker 5: Like what do you know what law they're invoking or
what gives him the right? Is this just an injunction?
It's just a temporary stall, is what that is.
Speaker 1: Yeah, most of these things are being done ex parte.
So the Trump administration does it get a chance to respond.
It's a ruling to stall the activity based upon an
activist lawsuit. In the case of the judge who said
that that that that they couldn't go out and make
these spending cuts, he actually said, there are people who
claim that the Treasury secretary is a fit your head.
Therefore it doesn't have any real power. Therefore we're not
going to let him cut these budgets. He actually said
that that's that's part of his legal theory. In another
judge and this is the case.
Speaker 5: Hold on, No on, did the judge argued because Trump
said the Treasury secretary theory say it?
Speaker 1: Leftist activists who sued said Sam Bessant is a figure head.
He's not really in power. Elon Musk or someone's else
is in power. Therefore he shouldn't be able to look
at the financial data. And this went into the decision
in the lawsuit. Well, he's a figurehead and therefore can't
look at the data.
Speaker 5: The Treasury wouldn't be in charge. The Treasury just pays
the bills. That's like it. That's like saying the Bank
of America decides where your money goes every month.
Speaker 1: That's ridiculous, I know. And but none of this makes sense.
Then you have this that the judge is. This guy's
name is John Bates, who ordered the government to restore
the sex the so called sex change and gender ideology websites.
His wife, Carol Reed, is a founder of Hope for
Children in Ethiopia, a long term recipient of.
Speaker 5: U s A.
Speaker 1: I D right right, you.
Speaker 5: Also, but you know, I didn't call me naive, But
but the amount of people that will line up gladly
and then defend it, the ability to get ill gotten
gains is it's just shocking to me. It just the
amount of and it's nothing new, obviously, it's as old
as human But the amount of people that will gladly,
uncourced just hand over their integrity for a check, it
just it never ceases to amaze me. I just said,
I'm like, yeah, but you got to look yourself in
the mirror, man. And now as long as we've got
the Gucci bag and the new Rolls Royce or whatever
it is, they're like that, that's morality. We know.
Speaker 1: And on judgment day and we talk about this often,
and I know I'm going to be judged and we
all everybody's going to be judged. You don't have to
like that, but that's a fact. Your me will bow,
your tongue, will confess. I can see these people going back.
I went to church and I took my kids to church,
and I could see Jesus going, right, you did, and
then you mutilated my kids and you lied about it,
and you stole money and you lied about it, and
you never repented that. I never knew you, because if
you knew me, you wouldn't have been doing these things.
And the Holy Spirit would have convicted you. And guess what. Look, guys,
And I could see Jesus saying, but guys, you had
cruises and trips and Gucci bags and look I'll show you.
Speaker 5: Look.
Speaker 1: Remember those homes you had. I'll let you see them again.
See all that. Hey, you had your reward. Yeah, now
you get to have eternity in hell. But you had
your reward, and you're going to have eternity to remember
when you didn't live in constant agony. Right, Man, I'm
the fun boarded guests, aren't I.
Speaker 5: Well?
Speaker 4: No.
Speaker 5: The other thing too, I think about is like Marry
in the library and here, how many of these people
are just indoctrinated, right, Like how many of them just
believe it because they've been pumped. How many of them
are active participants? Like that's the other part, Like do
you know because my assumption on the face of it
is that the usually this is the case, right where
the majority of supporters are just useful idiots, right, they
don't understand the mantle they're carrying with this one. In
this case, what do you think that percentage is Because
it's pretty it's a pretty ridiculous thing to support.
Speaker 1: I mean, I just so here's what this is my theory,
and I've shared this before the Evil Sandwich. There are
about fifteen percent of people at the top of things
who are in the grift. They're getting paid. There's people
who understand the gender madness is nonsense, but they're taking
the money. And you had the woman, the fake woman,
Rachel Levin, the man who pretends to be a woman,
who is second charge of HHS. He was always bragging
about the money. Now he got it done to himself,
So maybe he's one of the true believers. But about
fifteen percent of the people at the top, and I
think that a good In the federal government, I'm gonna
guess a good thirty percent of people in the federal
governments are no nothings, and they're put in jobs on purpose,
and you have a purposeful slowdowns like where they store.
We'd even talked about this, how you have to retire
a federal worker. And it's limited by how fast an
elevator can go up and down, like you have plans
inserted obsolescence. So there's about thirty percent of the people
they're putting these jobs because they're they're no nothings, do nothings,
and they clog up systems. And then right in the
middle you probably have a good I don't know, fifty
percent maybe even yeah, fifty percent of federal eployees. Good
what are we doing?
Speaker 4: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Yeah, none of this makes any sense, and yet they
get to do some good. Like they work at the
Social Security office and someone comes in I'm not getting
my check and that person looks because, oh my gosh,
we've got the wrong address for you, and let me
get this taken care of. And you know what, let
me talk to my supervisor. I can probably get you
four or five checks right now. Could that help? Could
I do that? And they leave their job at the
end of the day. Go let me tell you about
this old man came in. He was really sad and
didn't get a check and he was desperate. My supervisor
let me override some systems. He left with like five checks.
He was super happy. And you can see their family going,
you know, you know, you do good. Does that sound
reasonable to you?
Speaker 5: Yeah? Yeah? No, And I and I think that that
makes I think that makes all the sense in the world.
It is just it is so hard as a father
of kids to sit to encounter this and that back
and forth exchange that I had with that, Like it's
so once, like it's so one sided. It wasn't a disagreement,
like I mean, there were holes in her argument big
enough to run a truck, you know, a semi truck
through it. Like and I catch myself and I don't
say that saying, oh I want an argument. I say
that because it is just stupefying to me that you
can have an exchange like that and that person can
still leave that exchange thinking what they're thinking, where somebody
looks at them and goes, you're baseist and rationale for this?
Speaker 4: Is that.
Speaker 5: Creepy or excuse me? You know, young adults under the
age of consent can get breast reductions. And we're conflating
that like that, Sure that doesn't that dog don't hunt,
not in anybody's field, right, So I it just it.
It amazes me the lack of critical thinking, which is
why the dumbing down of the education system is part
and parcel to this. You can't do this to a
society unless you make them stupid, right, and they don't
know how to think.
Speaker 1: Yo, this is why they insert slogans. Okay, this is
why they slogan air trans women are women. Say it
fifty thousand times in your sleep and you're gonna end
up believing it. We talk about positive affirmation, Stuart Smally,
I'm good enough, I'm kind enough. Gosh, gosh, darn it,
people like me, and you know what that stuff works.
We're at the point of the edge, not just of insanity,
but of irreplaceable insanity. And I want to I want
to share with you, and you, brother, you call me
back from the edge so often, and I'm gonna invoke you.
I'm gonna invoke I'm gonna I'm going to I'm going
to rest upon your favor again because I'm gonna share
with you where I think we didn't even understand the
danger of what they're willing to do to Trump, to
stop the deep state from being discovered. So I share
this with you in just a second. There's an interdependence
that's president in all healthy organizations and families, or at
least a recognition of that interdependence. And Alan Soaps is
exactly this way. John their father, Alan and Ian's dad.
He's the mind, the marketing mind. He's the adult. He's
built businesses, very very successful in digital marketing. You would
know some of the campaigns he's worked on the world famous.
When he realized that his son Alan was going to
face enormous challenges, physical challenges. He's fourteen, He's been through
about eighteen operations as well. He's gonna probably have neurological challenges.
He does. He's effectively nonverbal. When doctors are saying, hey,
let us und alive your baby for you, he said, no, no,
we're not going to do that. He created a company
custom built for Alan, a place he could work that
makes a simple product but makes it brilliantly. Soap is simple.
Or if you are a great, big company that makes
it in China with slave labor, it's complicated because you
get all the chemicals, you want to hide the chemicals
with fake fragrances, et cetera. Alan soap is not that
it's made in America. Three generations of soap making expertise,
and John is a very crative man digitally, Alan, though nonverbal,
soap is his art. So you're going to encounter fragrances
of soap you've never experienced, like CedarA jasmine, and they
all tie back to very special memories for Alan. So
I think this will mean something to you. Yeah, there's
there's fragrance free and the soap is very mild because
Alan skin can't handle anything that's not Alan works there.
Ian works there, they aren't welcome and the rest of
the employment economy, even though they're very very successful workers there.
Amy has joined the team. She was neurotypical, absolutely normal neurologically,
and then late in life got autism and all of
a sudden, all the colleges are like, ah, that's too
bad for you. So now she's gainfully employed there. So
it's an interdependence. They all need each other. We need
soap and this you want to be a stinky, disgusting kippie,
you need soap. So go to Alan Soaps dot Com
slash Todd you get temper sent off all their products there.
And it's not just so. They have some of the
softest wash cloths I've ever seen, and they have that
thing that you use to get away from the dead skin.
I forget that it called I just want to call
it a hoofah. But then it's not a hoofa, that's
a it's a what lufah. Oh, my producer Alex knows
what it is. So okay, that's it. You've earned your nickname,
mister Lufa. Yep, yep, mister Lufa. He doesn't earn your nickname.
We've only worked together for a decade. Now you're mister Lufa.
It's Alan SOPs cam slash Todd tempercent off all your
products there. So, Zach, let's run through a little bit
of recent history together. We had the twenty twenty election
that is deeply suspect. I contend I know it was rigged.
I contend it was stolen. Many people agree. We had
the lawfare, we had the book keeping either air or
lie around Stormy Daniels that had expired, the statute limitations
blown up into like forty felonies. We had the Goldman
Sachs doesn't know how to value real estates, but Letitia
James does, and Latisha James is apparently scamming bank companies
for mortgages. We had President Trump's a Russian asset. We
had President Trump as a known repeat rapist, the Egene
Carol case being a myriad problems with those cases, with
that case. Don't know who to believe there. I believe,
I happen to believe Trump. We have all of that, Zach.
He wins, He gets past two attempts to kill him,
both of which are deeply suspect, deep please suspect. He wins.
Now we have judges coming and saying we recognize all
of those factors, Hermann. But right now the bureaucracy can't
protect itself. Trump has the Congress, He's got the Senate.
Speaker 5: So we.
Speaker 1: One person in Rhode Island whose job is just to
be a judge, is going to reach into the executive
branch and say to the American people, your vote doesn't
mean right, Shinola, right right. Something tells me that might
be dangerous.
Speaker 5: Well, look it is dangerous. And this goes back to
what you and I have always One of the biggest
things that frustrates me the most with these progressives is
they are the party of cutting off your notes despite
your face, meaning they're so little. I mean, obviously, I
don't think the Socratic method was like top on, you know,
in their educational priorities.
Speaker 1: As far as the.
Speaker 5: Way these people, I mean, they don't know how to think, right.
But you sit there and you go, you're literally constructing
your own prison here, guys, this is again you're usurping
the democratic process. This is by definition unconstitutional what you
are doing. The executive branch as selected and voted in
by a majority of Americans and the electoral College. He
has precisely these powers. This is exactly what we give
him the power to do, and you are unconstitutionally usurping
that power. And the look, this is why. And I
think that I think that this hammer should be swung judiciously,
and I think it should be swung cautiously, but it
needs to get swung. Nonetheless, people need to go to jail.
Speaker 1: People need to go to jail, and judges need to
be impeached.
Speaker 5: Yes, this has gotten out of control, right, and legislators
and judges are starting to represent black Lives Matter Act.
This right in downtown cities. People need to go to jail.
Law and order must be preserved by And I don't
care what Joy Baharr or what Pee Goldberg say on
the view. I don't care how just these people think
their cause is right. There is fascism and there is
anti law going on, and it's all on that side.
Speaker 1: Just yes, And here's not even obstruction.
Speaker 5: It's not even obstruction. We're past obstruction.
Speaker 1: And this is yes and love what you said, well said.
And this is what I would say to these judges
right now. President Trump is abiding by your ruling. You
said that. Seventy percent of Americans say he's keeping his promise.
He is a fifty three percent approval rate. Joe Biden
brags about not following the stink and Supreme Court three
times on student loan debt. He bragged about it. Okay,
if President Trump were to give a speech and explain
this very well, very simply, I am chief executive. You
elected me to run the executive branch. Here's an order
chart of the executive branch. Each of these bureaucracies is
in the executive branch. The CDC was given whatever thirty
two billion dollar budget. They get to decide how to
spend it.
Speaker 5: Mhm.
Speaker 1: That person works for me. I signed an executive order.
We're not doing the gender madness thing. That's not happening. Therefore,
we took down the websites because guess what, it's not real.
Boys aren't girls.
Speaker 5: Yeah, and legally speaking, the other thing that infuriates me
about this judge is ruling is that the bureaucrats bring
in this case and that they have no legal standing.
They don't get to make that call. It doesn't exist
right right.
Speaker 1: If President Trump carried out that speech with the order
strap behind him and turned to the American people and said,
you elected me to do this. I've thought a lot
about this. I prayed about it. I'm not going to
follow what these judges say. No, I'm not doing it.
We're not taking it down. It's going to go to
the Supreme Court. But I'm not going to stop. Well,
what percentage of people? Here's what I want to say,
this is, do you understand what happens when sixty percent
of Americans say sweet and he doesn't do it? There
was that whole thing. What was the president who said
the courts have made the ruling. Now make him. Now,
let's seem enforce it.
Speaker 5: Yeah right, yeah, yeah, Okay.
Speaker 1: If he does that and ignores the ruling and nothing
happens to him, and sixty percent of people support that
because guess what, seventy percent of people don't think boys
should compete against girls and men against women. Right, your
courts are going to discover why we call it the
illusion of control. Okay, your manufactured consent is gone. Now
let me introduce you to the enemy of society called
the illusion of control. You don't have any huh. Now
do you see where that could go?
Speaker 5: Yo? It's it's yeah, yeah, and it's you know, it's
the same as what was this lady's name. She's thest
of you know, the litany of whacked out progressives on
mainstream media. But she's on there. She's on there talking
about this is the constitutional crisis, and you're like, god,
since when did a president coming in appointing an independent
board to go review government spending? Public documents? By the way, right,
this is this is public stuff. That is that they're
just taking the time. I'm sitting there going, guys, what
is the allegation? I hear all of this, you know,
hyperbole and just not. What is the allegation you keep
saying constitutional? What's being violent? What's being violent?
Speaker 1: You had Anna Presley say, Elon Musk, who's a Nazi,
has his grubby hands all over mem and Grandma's social
Security numbers? Right, because Elon's going, Oh, that's where the
money is. That's where I'm gonna start having those checks
mailed to me.
Speaker 5: And it is right.
Speaker 1: I could you know what I could net out of
this thing? Twicey grand a month? Or you could take
the earned interest that you carried. They carried interest in
six seconds?
Speaker 5: How how hold on won't meman know for Social Security?
Come check comes up a little short? How are they? What? What? Again? Well,
I just want to know, tell me the worst case scenario.
What are we looking at here? Right? Well, it's all
public information anyway. Then what are you so upset? What
are you like? This is what we call Trump arrangement syndrome.
That's what it is like.
Speaker 1: Right, Like, that's your problem, sadly it is.
Speaker 5: It's just it just amazes me, sadly.
Speaker 1: So the new studio looks great, you sound great. And
let me be the one again to apologize for the
gaping gash in my forehead, and I hope the bleeding
wasn't super distracting. I'll try not to be bleeding next
time I see you.
Speaker 5: Good. Well, yeah, I'm just glad. I thought maybe you
were tangling with you know, somebody of the opposition. I thought,
you know, I'll.
Speaker 1: Think of a good story by the time I get home.
It'll be a couple of antif attacked me. But they're
they're going after a baby first. And there was a
dog involved, vicious. That's what got me. It was a
fang from the pit bull. And so but I'm okay
and I'm just no.
Speaker 5: Oh, you're a warrior, you know. Thank you, brother.
Speaker 1: Always great to have wise counsel from you. Gotta go
with you.
Speaker 5: You too, man, Thanks for having me.
Speaker 1: This is a Todd Herbert show. Remember God is a
god of order, not chaos. Please go be well, be strong,
be kind, and please make every effort to walk in
the ordered light of Christ.