Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Tuesday, the twenty seventh
Speaker 2: of January. You're of our Lord twenty twenty six. Well,
Speaker 2: we have Greg Bovine is being put out to Pastor
Speaker 2: Christinome is circling the drain reportedly, so there is some
Speaker 2: good news. I think the issue is that Trump jumped
Speaker 2: the shark when they started attacking the Second Amendment. When
Speaker 2: I started saying that anybody who carries a gun is
Speaker 2: dangerous and shouldn't expect to be killed. This is the
Speaker 2: Trump administration's position. The guy who said we'll take the
Speaker 2: gun and do the due process later, we'll take the
Speaker 2: life and we won't do an investigation later either. But
Speaker 2: we're also going to take a look at his board
Speaker 2: of peace. This is very important because this shows you
Speaker 2: what the father of the bio weapon would have created
Speaker 2: if he was one of our founding fathers. It is
Speaker 2: his idea of government, and not just any government, global government.
Speaker 2: If you don't understand that Trump is a globalist, that
Speaker 2: Trump wants to be Caesar, you need to pay attention
Speaker 2: to this show. We're going to lay it out for you,
Speaker 2: and we have gold fifty one hundred plus yesterday silver
Speaker 2: over one hundred dollars. There is a silver and gold
Speaker 2: lining to all of this Trump chaos. We'll be right
Speaker 2: back and let's talk about the money here. I touched
Speaker 2: on this briefly yesterday. We talked about the five billion
Speaker 2: dollars that the GOP is putting in this many omnibus bill,
Speaker 2: that they've added five billion dollars more for the refugee program.
Speaker 2: And as I said, the smallies did not come across
Speaker 2: the Mexican border. They didn't come over around the wall.
Speaker 2: They came as refugees. This is a program that began
Speaker 2: in the nineteen nineties under the Clinton administration, and it
Speaker 2: has been supported bipartisan at George W. Bush supported it,
Speaker 2: Obama supported Trump, Biden now Trump again, and in a
Speaker 2: big way. If you look at the trend of this
Speaker 2: when it first got started, it was very small, but
Speaker 2: that's not the way things go in Washington. By the
Speaker 2: time he got to twenty twenty one, it was two
Speaker 2: billion dollars that they were giving these people coming from
Speaker 2: places like Somalia. When you go the next year, they
Speaker 2: doubled it, Biden doubled it, went to four trillion, and
Speaker 2: then the last three years twenty twenty three, twenty twenty
Speaker 2: four to twenty twenty five, it's been six trillion. Now
Speaker 2: Trump and the Republicans want to increase it by eighty percent,
Speaker 2: add an additional five billion dollars to it. Now this
Speaker 2: is as we were rushing towards the forty trillion dollar
Speaker 2: government deficit. But I think it says something in terms
Speaker 2: of why are they adding so much all at once
Speaker 2: to a refugee program? Are they expecting to bring in
Speaker 2: the Ukrainian mafia?
Speaker 3: Next?
Speaker 2: We've had this Somalia mafia, the al Shabab people. They
Speaker 2: were brought in given loads of cash. And this is
Speaker 2: over and above and in addition to the scams that
Speaker 2: they started creating in terms of food programs and daycare
Speaker 2: and things like that. This is just money that they
Speaker 2: gave them to get them started. And why Minnesota, why
Speaker 2: do we have eighty thousand plus Somalians in Minnesota, most
Speaker 2: of them in this particular city. Well, it turns out
Speaker 2: that they're telling us that they went there because there
Speaker 2: was already an infrastructure to hand out this money. What infrastructure. Well,
Speaker 2: it was Catholic charities and Lutheran charities. They were handing
Speaker 2: this stuff out, which is why Ram Paul said, Look,
Speaker 2: if you want to bring people in and you want
Speaker 2: to help them, you do it. What happened to the
Speaker 2: Catholic and Lutheran churches that they don't want to help
Speaker 2: these people that they say need to be helped. They
Speaker 2: demand that the tax pay it. Because the taxpayer is
Speaker 2: going to be paying them. They set themselves up as
Speaker 2: a bureaucracy to take a cut, self serving, not serving
Speaker 2: their fellow man. And so this is why this is
Speaker 2: all happening in Minnesota. As I said, for the longest time,
Speaker 2: all the corruption with these Somali gangs, about the welfare fraud,
Speaker 2: about the daycare fraud, the food fraud, and all the
Speaker 2: rest of the stuff that's been going on since twenty eighteen,
Speaker 2: it's been known. I reported it back in twenty eighteen.
Speaker 2: Trump ignored it, Biden ignored it, and Trump continued to
Speaker 2: ignore it as he was ramping up these ice operations everywhere.
Speaker 2: He continued to ignore it until you had the viral
Speaker 2: report from that one individual. I am sorry I can't
Speaker 2: remember his name right now, but he goes around and
Speaker 2: he drew attention to it went very viral and so okay,
Speaker 2: now we're going to focus on that after like nine
Speaker 2: months of ICE and Border Patrol being out in the
Speaker 2: streets attacking people, and they don't need to attack people
Speaker 2: to get rid of smally fraud. That's the other thing
Speaker 2: when I see these Trump trolls coming after us, when
Speaker 2: we talk about the over the top actions of border
Speaker 2: patrol and ICE, they say, well, you know you want
Speaker 2: some mallies here, don't you. No, of course not get
Speaker 2: out of your Hegelian two step dance. I have no
Speaker 2: patience for people thought, well, it's either this or that.
Speaker 2: It's like, no, I'm not going to accept either one
Speaker 2: of your false premises as solutions. The reality is is
Speaker 2: that border patrols actions going door to door, having no
Speaker 2: knock raids, dragging an elderly man who's been a citizen,
Speaker 2: peacefully living here, law abiding citizen for thirty plus years,
Speaker 2: dragging him out in ten degree weather in his underwear,
Speaker 2: driving him around for an hour because they're having a
Speaker 2: clue who they're coming after, because they don't have a
Speaker 2: search warrant, they don't have an arrest weren't. They don't
Speaker 2: have any idea on this guy. They backfilled and said, well,
Speaker 2: you know he's connected to these other two families, said,
Speaker 2: we don't know who they are. They've never lived with us.
Speaker 2: We have no idea who these people are. And even
Speaker 2: if they weren't telling the truth, I think they're telling
Speaker 2: the truth. But even if they weren't, how did the
Speaker 2: Ice agents mistake a guy who is sixty something for
Speaker 2: these suspects who look like they're in the twenties Keystone
Speaker 2: cops and so these types of things and the murders
Speaker 2: that you see them engaged in, that doesn't have anything
Speaker 2: to do with the Smalley fraud. There needs to be auditors,
Speaker 2: There needs to be investigations. Bring in the accountants and
Speaker 2: the lawyers. That's how they got al capone. It wasn't
Speaker 2: the untouchables that did it. And these guys act like
Speaker 2: they're the untouchables. We can do whatever we wish, right,
Speaker 2: So we don't need untouchable law enforcement. What we need
Speaker 2: are some accountants and some lawyers to take down this fraud.
Speaker 2: And to do that, they're not even starting to do that.
Speaker 2: So take this Somali stuff off the table when it
Speaker 2: comes to what ICE is doing. Separate issues altogether have
Speaker 2: nothing to do with each other. That's why I say,
Speaker 2: you know, be very careful when the government creates a
Speaker 2: problem an open border, which continued under Trump. Remember we
Speaker 2: didn't have the caravans until the first Trump administration. As
Speaker 2: I've said before, you first few months, border crossings dropped
Speaker 2: to zero. They thought he was going to do something
Speaker 2: about it. They thought he was going to get tough
Speaker 2: because of all the tough talk. Then when they realized
Speaker 2: that he wasn't going to do anything about it was
Speaker 2: all just talk. Then you had the caravans organized and
Speaker 2: he didn't do anything about them. And then it got
Speaker 2: much worse under Biden. And now after they've built up
Speaker 2: this problem, they present you with an authoritarian, police state
Speaker 2: solution and you better go along with it, or if
Speaker 2: you don't, you're part of the problem. Now, these people
Speaker 2: created the problem, and the fact that they've got billions
Speaker 2: of dollars to bring in people that identify it as refugees.
Speaker 2: That's fine, there are real refugees out there. However, if
Speaker 2: people want to bring them in, let people sponsor them
Speaker 2: instead of the taxpayers. And now they want to ramp
Speaker 2: this up by eighty percent. Come on, this is just
Speaker 2: fraud in another way. Well, let's take a look before
Speaker 2: we get into gold and silver. Truly is amazing what
Speaker 2: has happened to gold and silver. That is the silver
Speaker 2: and gold lining of the Trump administration. So grab a
Speaker 2: hold of some of that stuff, because things aren't going
Speaker 2: to change in the Trump administration. He's very bad for
Speaker 2: the economy, he's very bad for liberty, he's very bad
Speaker 2: for peace and all those things, as well as the dollar.
Speaker 2: The harder they squeeze people with a dollar, the more
Speaker 2: people move away from it. And he's still doing that.
Speaker 2: He's still weaponizing the financial system that has been the
Speaker 2: basis of the American empire. He is doing the same
Speaker 2: thing that Biden did, and they're driving everybody in the
Speaker 2: world away from the US dollar intros and that's why
Speaker 2: you see what is happening with gold and silver. So
Speaker 2: we're going to get into that, but I want to
Speaker 2: begin with Greg Bovino.
Speaker 3: Bovine. I should say, he's.
Speaker 2: This this cow they brought in to shovel bs at everybody.
Speaker 2: So bye bye Bovino. Bovine is going to pasture. And
Speaker 2: I like this. This is sent to us This meme
Speaker 2: was sent by American House Hippo. There he is the
Speaker 2: cow and the Ice uniform with his m rap behind him,
Speaker 2: and it says on their ministry of love. And that's
Speaker 2: exactly what it is, right, it is the ministry of love.
Speaker 2: It is purely or will in Well. In the hours
Speaker 2: following the shooting of Alex, pretty correct that that's murder. Okay,
Speaker 2: this is I'm reading this even from media height, they
Speaker 2: won't call it what it is. It's a murder.
Speaker 3: Murder can you spell that? Media?
Speaker 2: I mean, these people, hardcore leftist democrats who hate Trump,
Speaker 2: and they can't call it a murder. We've seen the
Speaker 2: video from multiple angles. It was another murder. Let's call
Speaker 2: it what it is. You know, before this bovine got fired,
Speaker 2: he went after the First Amendment and he said, don't
Speaker 2: you dare call ice gestapo? Uh, don't you dare call
Speaker 2: us kidnappers. I'll call you murderers. Okay. He says, if
Speaker 2: you do that, you're an influencer or whatever or so
Speaker 2: called journalist, there'll be consequences for you. I said, come
Speaker 2: after me. Well it turns out he's going to be going.
Speaker 2: But this is the contempt these people in the Trump
Speaker 2: administration have for every part of the Bill of Rights
Speaker 2: and the Constitution. Trump doesn't want to be governed by
Speaker 2: any law. He does really want to be a dictator.
Speaker 2: And these people hate the First Amendment, they hate peaceful
Speaker 2: assembly to redress agrievances, they hate that, They hate the
Speaker 2: free press, they hate free speech on social media. You know,
Speaker 2: don't you dare say that. Of course we've got Elon
Speaker 2: Musk now tightening it down. I hadn't noticed as already
Speaker 2: heavi least shadow band anyway, So yeah, I always thought
Speaker 2: it was a joke that people thought that Elon Musk
Speaker 2: had bought free speech for us. Again, he's going to
Speaker 2: hand it to us on a silver platter. It's like,
Speaker 2: do you not know who this guy is? Do you
Speaker 2: not know anything about technocracy and his background with that?
Speaker 2: I mean, that's the most absurd thing that was sold
Speaker 2: to us by Babylon b which, by the way, seems
Speaker 2: to really have gone down the drain itself. Their insights
Speaker 2: are hitting as flat as their comedy anymore. But anyway,
Speaker 2: let's get back to this, would be want to be
Speaker 2: dictator saying there's going to be consequences if you call
Speaker 2: us Gestapo. There's going to be consequences if you say
Speaker 2: we're kidnappers. Well, it turns out the consequences for being
Speaker 2: a Gestapo kidnapper or you lose your job, even in
Speaker 2: the Trump administration, because once these people started going after
Speaker 2: the Second Amendment, they started losing a lot of their
Speaker 2: hardcore supporters, people who would just go along with whatever
Speaker 2: Trump did, no matter how he defied the principles of
Speaker 2: conservatives and so forth. And even though he had shown
Speaker 2: himself to be a New York City Democrat gun grabber
Speaker 2: in the first administration by doing gun control by executive order,
Speaker 2: no other president has done that before. But immediately I said,
Speaker 2: you watch, the Democrats are going to do the same thing.
Speaker 2: And within a day or two you had La La
Speaker 2: Harris say, when I become president, I'm going to put
Speaker 2: out a list of gun control issues that I want.
Speaker 2: I'm going to give Congress hundred days to pass it,
Speaker 2: and if they don't, I'll do it myself by executive order,
Speaker 2: just like Trump did. And of course Biden did the
Speaker 2: same thing as well. Actually, Trump put in not just
Speaker 2: the bump stock gun control executive order, but he also
Speaker 2: put in the pistol brace executive order. He put that in,
Speaker 2: and then he removed it in December twenty twenty when
Speaker 2: there was a fight going on to try to stay
Speaker 2: in the White House. And then immediately like a month later,
Speaker 2: Biden gets in and he reinstates the Trump pistol brace band.
Speaker 2: But that was a Trump van, and just like what
Speaker 2: we saw this last couple of days, the NRA was
Speaker 2: silent about that massive usurpation of power into the executive branch,
Speaker 2: into the ATF. Silent about it. That's the NRA. Gun
Speaker 2: Owners of America fought it, and gun owners America fought
Speaker 2: the these notions that you shouldn't bring a gun to
Speaker 2: a protest. I think that it's probably a good idea
Speaker 2: that you're not the only person at a protest with
Speaker 2: a gun, because then that makes you a target. And
Speaker 2: we saw that, as I pointed out yesterday at the Alamo,
Speaker 2: we had hundreds of people showed up to push for
Speaker 2: open carry in the state of Texas before they had
Speaker 2: constitutional carry I'm sorry, constitutional open carry in Texas, and
Speaker 2: so a lot of people showed up. Most of them
Speaker 2: were carrying a slong rifle over their shoulder, which was
Speaker 2: already legal, but they wanted more constitutional carry, and the
Speaker 2: police left everybody alone until most of the people cleared out,
Speaker 2: and then when there's just a couple of people around,
Speaker 2: they came after them. And that's what will happen if
Speaker 2: you're the only one who shows up at a demonstration.
Speaker 2: But if everybody is armed, that is the best possible scenario, folks,
Speaker 2: Because the Second Amendment is like nuclear weapons, mutual assured destruction.
Speaker 2: That's the value of the Second Amendment. It isn't that
Speaker 2: we want to have an asymmetric guerrilla war, but it's
Speaker 2: a threat that that could happen that restrains government. Nobody
Speaker 2: wants that, just like nobody wants a nuclear war. But
Speaker 2: these things can restrict behavior. It's a dangerous situation. It's
Speaker 2: a dangerous situation. We've got a government like the one
Speaker 2: that we've got here. So anyway, it's a He was
Speaker 2: actually smarter than christineome I thought Bovino because rather than
Speaker 2: just making up ridiculously absurd lies like christineam and Donald Trump.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, he was.
Speaker 2: They were stuck in the snow, and as they were
Speaker 2: stuck in the snow, this woman tried to kill him
Speaker 2: with a car. We can all see that wasn't true.
Speaker 2: She didn't even bother to look at the video. She's
Speaker 2: that stupid, that contemptuous of your intelligence that you hadn't
Speaker 2: even tried to concoct a plausible lie, and she's not
Speaker 2: doing it this time either. Instead, Greg Bovino was evasive,
Speaker 2: which is a better approach just making stuff up like Trump.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he was run over.
Speaker 3: It's amazing that he was survived.
Speaker 2: And then they had to come up with a cover
Speaker 2: story saying that he was taken to the hospital that
Speaker 2: he had internal bleeding in his Torso that's a clear
Speaker 2: medical diagnosis, isn't it. As that people pointed out, if
Speaker 2: you got internal bleeding, they're not going to let you
Speaker 2: out after a couple of hours, They're going to keep
Speaker 2: you overnight for observation. Everything about that was an obvious lie.
Speaker 2: And then they started lying about the Second Amendment. Well,
Speaker 2: when you look at what happened yesterday, Bovino went on
Speaker 2: offense on social media, and like so many people before him,
Speaker 2: he got fired because of what.
Speaker 3: He said on social media.
Speaker 2: He started attacking Republicans who were criticizing the tactics and
Speaker 2: the operation. He came after Bill Cassidy, He came after
Speaker 2: Bill Crystal. He came after Thomas Massey, and he was
Speaker 2: saying things like illegal aliens and people like you who
Speaker 2: choose them over American citizens are the problem, and attacking
Speaker 2: law enforcement is not a right that you want it
Speaker 2: to be. Well, this is not about attacking law enforcement.
Speaker 2: This is about quote unquote law enforcement who's never bothered
Speaker 2: to read the Constitution, or if they read it, they
Speaker 2: don't understand it and won't follow it. They have been
Speaker 2: attacking people who are filming them as they walk about
Speaker 2: in masks and in many cases civilian clothing doing whatever
Speaker 2: they please. Bullies and thugs walking up to people, threatening
Speaker 2: them into their face because they're filming. And we've had
Speaker 2: Supreme Court decisions that have supported that. That is you're right,
Speaker 2: whether I have Thisupreme Court says it is, that is
Speaker 2: our right. They film us all the time in public areas,
Speaker 2: and they not only film us, but they doxs us,
Speaker 2: They put us into databases, they profile us, they profile
Speaker 2: our cars on these flock cameras. Oh well, it's not government,
Speaker 2: it's a private corporation that's doing it for government, folks.
Speaker 2: That's just fascism. Fascism economic definition of fascism is a
Speaker 2: merger of corporations in state, and that's what we're seeing
Speaker 2: here in terms of law enforcement. It truly is fascistic
Speaker 2: in terms of its brutal, its brutality, the beatings and
Speaker 2: all the rest of the stuff, but also in terms
Speaker 2: of the connection between corporations and government. And so they
Speaker 2: film us all the time. But don't you dare film them,
Speaker 2: because they'll get in your face. They'll shove you, hoping
Speaker 2: that you will shove them back, so they can gang
Speaker 2: up on you and beat you and picture on the ground,
Speaker 2: maybe even kill you like they did Alex Preddy. Just
Speaker 2: take a look at this. This is a guy who
Speaker 2: is standing on his front porch as ice is going
Speaker 2: crazy in the streets, and they run up to his
Speaker 2: front porch and threaten.
Speaker 1: Him sitting here, bringing the mother house.
Speaker 4: You ain't supposed to smack him like that. The fuck
Speaker 4: is wrong with you?
Speaker 1: Hell no, man, I'm on my property.
Speaker 4: I ain't got to listen to you. You can't. You
Speaker 4: ain't got to search more. You can't come over here.
Speaker 2: Man, Hey, look I got your trespass.
Speaker 1: I'm on my property.
Speaker 2: They don't care about law. I care about constitution. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: you have no rights. They have the rights, and they
Speaker 2: have the right to kill you whether or not they
Speaker 2: are under threat. All they have to do is say, well,
Speaker 2: I felt threatened. I can kill you. And if you
Speaker 2: run from them, they can kill you as well because
Speaker 2: you're afraid of them. If you're genuinely afraid of them
Speaker 2: for good reason and you run from them, they can
Speaker 2: kill you with that as well. And so this is
Speaker 2: attacking citizens for filming them. And of course they call
Speaker 2: us civilians. These people who call you civilians, folks, understand,
Speaker 2: they see themselves as militarized police. They see themselves as military.
Speaker 2: So you are a civilian. They're federalized militarized police, state cops.
Speaker 2: And it needs to be stopped. They're gestapo, you hear that,
Speaker 2: Greg Gestapo. That's what you are, a still as gestapo.
Speaker 2: And the attitude that has come from the top down
Speaker 2: from this bovine character is demonstrated by this.
Speaker 5: You want to know what the ice officer said right
Speaker 5: after he shot and killed somebody in the street.
Speaker 3: Boo who?
Speaker 5: He said, boohoo? And that's according to the Associated Press.
Speaker 5: I can't believe this is our country.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well it's not just that. Take a look at
Speaker 2: this video. Lots of videos out there. That's what they
Speaker 2: don't like. They really hate a bunch of citizens who
Speaker 2: are armed with cameras. What does that tell you they
Speaker 2: know what they're doing. And look at this, This is
Speaker 2: as the shooting is happening. You got a guy who
Speaker 2: and ice who is clapping about them shooting a guy
Speaker 2: that they have pinned to the ground, beaten and removed
Speaker 2: his gun, and then they shoot him ten times mostly
Speaker 2: in the back. Watch this guy who claps yeah, and
Speaker 2: we're gonna show it closer here. What's this.
Speaker 6: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Yeah, the guns? Yeah, good job, good job, he killed him.
Speaker 2: That's it, okay. And then, of course, this is what
Speaker 2: Bovine said in terms of threatening free speech.
Speaker 7: Colleague law enforcement names like Geshapo or U firm, kidnapping.
Speaker 7: That is a choice that has made their actions and
Speaker 7: consequences that come from those choices. And then when you
Speaker 7: choose when someone chooses to listen to a politician, a
Speaker 7: so called journalist, a community leader that spouted that type
Speaker 7: of vilification to an accessory there also, I think we
Speaker 7: saw that yesterday.
Speaker 2: Yeah, this guy who is a murder an accessory murder,
Speaker 2: and he's one of the things he put out is
Speaker 2: is toport the illegal aliens that you let in.
Speaker 3: For four years.
Speaker 2: As he's replying to some of the Democrats, as I
Speaker 2: just said, they were let in for four years under Trump,
Speaker 2: which and I think he was at the border patrol
Speaker 2: during that time as well. So hey, Greg, you let
Speaker 2: them in as well. Problem solution, Well, he got such
Speaker 2: a problem. Now we got to have Nazis and hear
Speaker 2: and it used to be before Alex Jones turned when
Speaker 2: he was still doing his police State documentaries, he exactly said,
Speaker 2: they said they're going to create a problem. Say it
Speaker 2: is so big now we have to have a marshal
Speaker 2: law time. Now he's cheering for martial law. He's cheering
Speaker 2: the police state. Isn't that telling? Well, so again, you
Speaker 2: let these people in for four years. And now even
Speaker 2: now the Republican Party is going to give five billion
Speaker 2: dollars an eighty percent increase to the refugee program. We
Speaker 2: should not be giving any money to the welfare magnet.
Speaker 2: They're making it bigger and bigger all the time. And
Speaker 2: not just that, but the hypocrisy, the open hypocrisy of
Speaker 2: the Trump administration in it says that they're giving tens
Speaker 2: of millions of dollars to Planned Parenthood that they cut
Speaker 2: out last March, and they quietly did it. They didn't
Speaker 2: tell anybody about it. And now they've had a vote
Speaker 2: to support that yet again. And I sue you had
Speaker 2: eighty Republicans who voted to fund abortions and the mutilation
Speaker 2: of miners with these transgender surgeries. It's not enough to
Speaker 2: stand by and to not stop this stuff. It should
Speaker 2: be illegal to have an abortion, it should be illegal
Speaker 2: to mutilate a minor and sterilize them for life. That
Speaker 2: should be illegal. Instead, you've got Republicans who are voting
Speaker 2: with all the Democrats. Nearly all the Democrats voted for this,
Speaker 2: So there's no difference between these two parties and these issues.
Speaker 2: And they're voting to give money to pay. Not only
Speaker 2: are they not going to stop it, they're going to
Speaker 2: have you pay for it with your taxes. That's how
Speaker 2: bad this is. And this is Republicans joining with the Democrats.
Speaker 2: They become indistinguishable. And you've had people like Thomas Massey
Speaker 2: and a couple of other people. Burkett here in Tennessee
Speaker 2: has pushed back against the guy. And Texas will get
Speaker 2: to that in a minute said, you know what's going
Speaker 2: on with these people? One of them said, who needs
Speaker 2: Democrats when you got Republicans like this? I would say,
Speaker 2: who needs Republicans like this? We don't need them. They're
Speaker 2: not a solution. They're indistinguishable from the other side. This
Speaker 2: is the bipartisan aspect of it. And if you don't
Speaker 2: see how this is infected both sides, they are going
Speaker 2: to drag you into a civil war over this phony tribalism.
Speaker 2: And the border is just another issue of phony tribalism.
Speaker 2: They want to least surveillance state, They want digital ID,
Speaker 2: they want money that they can shut off and shut
Speaker 2: down all the time. That's what the Genius Act was about.
Speaker 2: And we've just seen that we've had nearly two hundred
Speaker 2: million dollars frozen and stolen out of tether stable coin,
Speaker 2: which is what Lucky Lootnik runs. Okay, so it's not
Speaker 2: a theory. They gave themselves the power to do this
Speaker 2: in the Genius Act, and they demanded that all of
Speaker 2: these so called stable coins have the ability to do that.
Speaker 2: And now they just have passed yet again. Well they
Speaker 2: didn't pass. It was passed several years. To excuse me,
Speaker 2: several years ago, they passed a bill to put kill
Speaker 2: switches in cars. Thomas Massey has for at least the
Speaker 2: second time, tried to stop that, tried to overturn it,
Speaker 2: and things have gotten worse. Many of the Democrats who
Speaker 2: voted with him the first time to overturn this kill
Speaker 2: switch are now voting to keep the kill switch. It's
Speaker 2: getting worse all the time in the Republican Party, folks,
Speaker 2: The solution does not lie in Washington, doesn't lie in
Speaker 2: any branch of the federal government, doesn't lie in getting
Speaker 2: the right president in. The solution is not about getting
Speaker 2: a Republican Congress. The solution is not about putting people
Speaker 2: in the judiciary. The solution lies in the Tenth Amendment.
Speaker 2: And this is why Trump is pushing so hard to
Speaker 2: end the tenth Amendment. It's real obvious and in your
Speaker 2: face that they're trying to shut down the first Amendment, right,
Speaker 2: there'll be consequences if you call us names who don't
Speaker 2: like And it's real clear that they want to shut
Speaker 2: down the Second Amendment as well. But all this is
Speaker 2: about is really shutting down the tenth Amendment. Everything that
Speaker 2: the Trump administration has been doing domestically is about consolidating
Speaker 2: power into the executive branch, into Washington, but into the
Speaker 2: Oval office. It's bad enough that everything is being centralized
Speaker 2: in Washington, that every law has to be a federal law,
Speaker 2: and that every problem has to be addressed by a
Speaker 2: federal quote unquote solution. But he wants to make it
Speaker 2: everything is under the president's control. He looks at the
Speaker 2: Federal Reserve and it's awful. Instead of ending it, though,
Speaker 2: he wants to be the Federal Reserve. He looks at
Speaker 2: the UN, and instead of ending our involvement in the UN,
Speaker 2: he wants to be the UN himself, a one man UN.
Speaker 2: That's what the Peace.
Speaker 3: Board is about. And so where do we go from here?
Speaker 2: Well, a civil war has broken out even within these
Speaker 2: institutions that need to be abolished, ice, border patrol, homeland security.
Speaker 2: What do we do, Well, you know, we didn't have
Speaker 2: those organizations for a couple hundred years. This year they're
Speaker 2: going to talk about the Declaration of Independence. We talk
Speaker 2: about how now they have declared us as dependents and
Speaker 2: how they are ruling us and overturning not only de
Speaker 2: croationial of Independence, but the Constitution of Bill Wrights as well.
Speaker 2: That's what we need to reflect on this year. We
Speaker 2: need a little bit of common sense Thomas painstyle. And
Speaker 2: so right now there is a civil war because Boveno
Speaker 2: was border patrol and the ICE people are saying he's
Speaker 2: making us look bad. And you got a Fox reporter
Speaker 2: Bill Malugan who said he's spoken over a half dozen
Speaker 2: federal sources and Immigration Enforcement, including several and senior positions,
Speaker 2: about their disappointment with the department's handling of these shootings.
Speaker 3: You know, things like.
Speaker 2: And it's not just the guys in the street, you know,
Speaker 2: that's the attitude they've caught from above where they clap
Speaker 2: after they shoot somebody who they've disarmed and pinned to
Speaker 2: the ground. They shoot him in the back, and then
Speaker 2: they clap. And then when people go, what are you doing?
Speaker 2: A bunch of murders? Who who? You know, that's their attitude.
Speaker 2: It's just as bad for the people in terms of
Speaker 2: the President, Christinome, Greg Bovino for them to say there
Speaker 2: will be no investigation. We're not going to give any
Speaker 2: of this information to local law enforcement or local district attorneys. No,
Speaker 2: you can't see any of that. We're going to hide
Speaker 2: all of that just like the Epstein files, we're going
Speaker 2: to hide all that. We'll do our own investigation. And
Speaker 2: you know from what their comments, they've already decided that
Speaker 2: they're going to give absolute immunity to these guys. There's
Speaker 2: not going to be any investigation. These so called investigations
Speaker 2: are as phony as the commissions that government puts out
Speaker 2: every once in a while. You know, we had the
Speaker 2: JFK commission. I looked at that and they come up
Speaker 2: with this absurd thing, the magic bullet, and it's a
Speaker 2: cover up, just like you've seen all these COVID commissions
Speaker 2: looking in the UK and other places.
Speaker 3: Let's take a look at.
Speaker 2: What the government did, and they come out and say,
Speaker 2: you know, we did everything exactly right. They're all there
Speaker 2: to whitewash everything. And that's what these things are going
Speaker 2: to be. They're just going to be just like one
Speaker 2: of these commissions where they commit the crime and then
Speaker 2: say nothing to see here. Well, Bill Malogan at Fox
Speaker 2: News said his sources admitted that they had grown quote
Speaker 2: uneasy and frustrated unquote with the claims and narratives pushed
Speaker 2: by DHS after Pretty's death. Well, let's talk. Let's understand
Speaker 2: what we're talking about claims and narratives. These folks are
Speaker 2: the absurd lies that are an insult to our intelligence
Speaker 2: and the very definition of the character of people like Christinam,
Speaker 2: Donald Trump, and Greg Bovino. After the killing of Good
Speaker 2: and Pretty was immediately labeled terrorists domestic terrorists by DHS officials,
Speaker 2: including christ you know, who had also told us previously
Speaker 2: that you know, all the lies about being stuck in
Speaker 2: the snow, and we heard the lies from Trump. Yeah,
Speaker 2: he was run over and the guy had to be hospitalized.
Speaker 2: Surprised that he even survived. And then the New York
Speaker 2: Times said that's not what happened. Oh yeah, it was like,
Speaker 2: you haven't even seen the video, have you, because he
Speaker 2: tells his assistant, get the video and let's see it.
Speaker 2: As they showed the video to Trump, he's speechless because
Speaker 2: he can see that he was lied to by his subordinates.
Speaker 2: He never bothered, He never cared enough to even look
Speaker 2: at the video, and he just went with some absurd
Speaker 2: lies that some lackey told him, and so he changed
Speaker 2: the subject. He didn't try to explain it how he
Speaker 2: could have gotten to that conclusion. He knew it was
Speaker 2: a lie, and he just changed the subject. So Bovino said,
Speaker 2: it resembled a situation where an individual wanted to do
Speaker 2: maximum damage. Nom said, Preddy had a weapon on him,
Speaker 2: and he wished to inflict harm on these officers coming
Speaker 2: and brandishing like that.
Speaker 3: Well he didn't brandish it. Hey, you know, how can
Speaker 3: we be absolutely positive of it?
Speaker 2: Well, we saw them take the gun out of the
Speaker 2: back of his pants and one of them said gun.
Speaker 3: Gun.
Speaker 2: They didn't know that he had a gun up until
Speaker 2: that point. And then the person who is standing right
Speaker 2: there looking down. Even though the person says gun gun
Speaker 2: and pull the gun out, that person opens fire right away.
Speaker 2: I don't believe for a minute this narrative about, well,
Speaker 2: this is a sag and they've got some issues with
Speaker 2: firing and so forth. Not all the time, right, It's
Speaker 2: just like the Trump bioweapon doesn't kill people instantly all
Speaker 2: the time. Sometimes it takes a very long time for
Speaker 2: that to happen. Sometimes you can use one of these
Speaker 2: sighs for a very very long time before you have
Speaker 2: some issue with that. And it didn't go off with
Speaker 2: these guys beating him, gang banging him and all.
Speaker 3: The rest of the stuff.
Speaker 2: It didn't It didn't go off with any of that stuff,
Speaker 2: so I don't believe that that was that's the alibi
Speaker 2: that they're trying to come up with.
Speaker 4: Also, I think we can just use Akham's razor here.
Speaker 4: What's more likely a safety failure or one of the
Speaker 4: what ten to fifteen guys holding guns pointing them at
Speaker 4: him shot him.
Speaker 3: That's right.
Speaker 4: You can just look at that and say, come on,
Speaker 4: that's an obvious falsehood.
Speaker 2: It was a Barney Fife moment. Yeah, well, any he
Speaker 2: had a gun. I heard somebody say he had a gun,
Speaker 2: so I just had to shoot and keep firing.
Speaker 4: There's also the fact that if you truly believe the
Speaker 4: shooting is justified, you don't need to try to finagle
Speaker 4: this surround. You don't need to try to walk around
Speaker 4: the edges. Oh well, probably a misfire on it. You're
Speaker 4: trying to give deniability, You're trying to give an excuse.
Speaker 2: And why not have an open investigation? Why not show
Speaker 2: people how you are the victims?
Speaker 3: There?
Speaker 2: Your masked, armored and armed agents are the victims. Why
Speaker 2: don't show us that We know exactly why they're trying
Speaker 2: to cover this up, same reason they cover up all
Speaker 2: the COVID stuff. The same reason they won't give you
Speaker 2: their data for the climate mcguffin, because they're lying and
Speaker 2: they know it. Same reason they won't show you the
Speaker 2: Epstein documents. How many times do we have to see
Speaker 2: government refused to have any investigation, refuse to show us documentation,
Speaker 2: refuse to do tests of their vaccines and anything, and
Speaker 2: then tell us just believe us. We've already done this,
Speaker 2: and no, no, no, you can't talk about that. Don't
Speaker 2: talk about that, or we're going to come after you specifically,
Speaker 2: I'm told, said Mulligan, that extreme frustration with DHS officials
Speaker 2: going on TV putting out statements claiming that Alex Pretty
Speaker 2: was intending to conduct a massacre of federal agents or
Speaker 2: wanted to carry out maximum damage, even after numerous videos
Speaker 2: appeared to show that those claims are inaccurate, said Maligan.
Speaker 3: Isn't that nice?
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's how it gets to get a job at
Speaker 2: Fox News. He uses the term inaccurate instead of a lie.
Speaker 2: I use the term lie because I can see their motivation.
Speaker 2: They are liars and murderers. These sources say that messaging
Speaker 2: from DHS officials has been catastrophic from a pr and
Speaker 2: morale perspective, as it is eroding trust and credibility. You bet,
Speaker 2: last night, after the stuff came out about Bovino, he
Speaker 2: had all these trolls on Twitter and they start coming
Speaker 2: up on my feed and it's like they're saying, well,
Speaker 2: Bovino was great for morale and everybody loved him, and
Speaker 2: you know we need to support him and demand that
Speaker 2: he'd be reinstated. Please like this post if you want
Speaker 2: him reinstated. So I retweeted that and I said, I
Speaker 2: really wish there was a dislike button so I could
Speaker 2: say the opposite on this, but I think.
Speaker 3: This guy needs to go.
Speaker 2: And anyway, so again, when you look at what people
Speaker 2: have said about this, we've got police chiefs talking about
Speaker 2: hell a press conference. This is before this second murder,
Speaker 2: and this is what they were saying about the reckless
Speaker 2: way that ICE was conducting itself.
Speaker 8: Good morning everyone, I'm Mark Really, police chief of City
Speaker 8: of Brooklyn Park. Behind me is a bunch of amazing
Speaker 8: police chiefs that are here in support of a very
Speaker 8: short but very important message that we want to share
Speaker 8: with you. What you won't hear for many of us
Speaker 8: today is rhetoric of abolish Ice or that there shouldn't
Speaker 8: be immigration enforcement. The truth is immigration enforcement is necessary
Speaker 8: for national security and for local security, but how it's
Speaker 8: done is extremely important. In fact, we have a long
Speaker 8: history of working exceptionally well with our federal partners, including
Speaker 8: ICE agents, and we have seen the best of them
Speaker 8: performed their job extremely well in the past. With that said, recently,
Speaker 8: as the last two weeks, we as law enforcement community,
Speaker 8: have been receiving endless complaints about civil rights violations.
Speaker 3: This is before the murders in our.
Speaker 8: Streets from US citizens. What we're hearing is they're being
Speaker 8: stopped in traffic stops or on the street with no
Speaker 8: cause and being forced to demand paperwork to determine if
Speaker 8: they are here legally. As this went on over the
Speaker 8: past two weeks, we started hearing from our police officers
Speaker 8: the same complaints as they fell victim to this well
Speaker 8: off duty. Every one of these individuals is a person
Speaker 8: of color who has had this happen to them. In
Speaker 8: Brooklyn Park, one particular officer that shared her story with
Speaker 8: me was stopped as she passed ICE going down the roadway.
Speaker 8: When they boxed her in, they demanded her paperwork, of
Speaker 8: which she's a US citizen, and clearly would not have
Speaker 8: any paperwork. When she became concerned.
Speaker 3: About not seeing the stope treated.
Speaker 8: She pulled out her phone in an attempt to record
Speaker 8: the incident. The phone was knocked out of her hands
Speaker 8: prevented her from recording it. The officer had their guns
Speaker 8: drawn during this interaction, and after the officer became so concerned,
Speaker 8: they were forced to identify themselves as a Brooklyn Park
Speaker 8: police officer in hopes of slowing the incident and de
Speaker 8: escalating the incident down. The agents then immediately left after
Speaker 8: hearing this, making no other comments, no other apologies, just
Speaker 8: got on their vehicles and left. I wish I could
Speaker 8: tell you that this was an isolated incitant. In fact,
Speaker 8: many of the chiefs standing behind me have similar instants
Speaker 8: with their off duty officers. This isn't just important because
Speaker 8: it happened to op duty police officers, but what it
Speaker 8: did do is we know that our officers know what
Speaker 8: the constitution is, they know what right and wrong is,
Speaker 8: and they know when people are being targeted, and that's
Speaker 8: what they were. If it is happening to our officers,
Speaker 8: it pains me to think how many of our community
Speaker 8: members are falling victim to this every day. It has
Speaker 8: to stop.
Speaker 2: A group of police chief saying this is not the
Speaker 2: way that you conduct yourself. This is why we don't
Speaker 2: have federal police. This is why we don't have the
Speaker 2: military operating as police, or people who call themselves police
Speaker 2: who operate as military. And after the killing, the murder
Speaker 2: of Renee Good, you had this Sheriff Chris Swanson had
Speaker 2: this to say.
Speaker 9: What would you And obviously this is twenty twenty hindsight,
Speaker 9: but how do you think you would have handled that
Speaker 9: situation with Renee Good her car blocking the street? What
Speaker 9: do you think should have been done?
Speaker 3: Well?
Speaker 10: If I was there, And again you're right, it's hindsight,
Speaker 10: but I want to stood in front of the car
Speaker 10: and you give verbal commands if the car is turning away.
Speaker 10: My question is what crime was committed protesting? I mean,
Speaker 10: you saw what happened to the George Floyd protests during
Speaker 10: the twenty twenty and out of Henepen County in Minneapolis, Minnesota,
Speaker 10: we had forty process that summer here. We didn't arrest
Speaker 10: people that were blocking the street. We didn't arrest people
Speaker 10: who were just completely upset. This is part of the process,
Speaker 10: is what law enforcement deals with so I would have
Speaker 10: kept on verbal commands. You can take the context of
Speaker 10: the situation. She didn't appear to be a threat, although
Speaker 10: she's protested, and I get it she could amp people up.
Speaker 10: It doesn't matter. That's not justification for deadly force. And
Speaker 10: then the force continuum that all law enforcement is required
Speaker 10: to follow. As escalation goes up, we go up. As
Speaker 10: it goes down, we go down. Instantaneously, the burden falls
Speaker 10: on law enforcement. And I want to tell you, for
Speaker 10: law enforcement out there watching that shooting, you can't take
Speaker 10: pride in what just happened. Yes, if the you can
Speaker 10: be used as a weapon, it wasn't used as a
Speaker 10: weapon that day. It's what the American people saw. Tires
Speaker 10: turned to the right. She's getting out. She's like, I'm
Speaker 10: not mad at you. I'm not mad at you. I
Speaker 10: don't care if she was there all day. You take
Speaker 10: the things that are in contact at that moment, and
Speaker 10: you make a decision. Was that decision to use deadly
Speaker 10: force the best decision. I don't think the American people
Speaker 10: think that, and ically don't think that.
Speaker 2: We have to make a distinction between legitimate law enforcement
Speaker 2: and legitimate actions. We don't want to have just pure
Speaker 2: anarchy in the streets. You know, the law enforcement can
Speaker 2: be good, but it has to follow rules. And so
Speaker 2: that's why you hear these police chiefs in Minnesota while
Speaker 2: you have a sheriff Chris Swanson others speaking out about this.
Speaker 2: A lawless police force that does whatever they wish. Folks,
Speaker 2: that is the worst possible case you can have. It's
Speaker 2: worse than any gang because nobody's going to stop them.
Speaker 2: And this is why law enforcement needs to be kept local.
Speaker 2: It needs to be elected, it needs to have some
Speaker 2: kind of accountability, and there is no accountability for any
Speaker 2: of the federal police. So yes, abolish ice, Abolish the FBI.
Speaker 2: Abolish this idea that we're going to have the DEA
Speaker 2: and we're going to have these problems solved in Washington.
Speaker 2: Federal law enforcement is an abomination to our liberty, to
Speaker 2: the constitution. These institutions need to be shut down. These
Speaker 2: functions need to be put at the local level. Law
Speaker 2: enforcement at the local level. Yes, have laws about immigration,
Speaker 2: that's fine, but let's not have any more federal police.
Speaker 2: We went for a century and a half before we
Speaker 2: had any FBI, and it's been a bureaucracy and a
Speaker 2: bureaucratic abomination ever since it was created, throughout the entire
Speaker 2: time of Jaeger Hoover. And then take a look at
Speaker 2: cash matel We've had one bad FBI director after the other.
Speaker 2: Let's get rid of the FBI. Let's get rid of
Speaker 2: Homeland Security, which is a bureaucracy of bureaucracies. Let's get
Speaker 2: rid of that. Let's get rid of ICE. This institution,
Speaker 2: regardless of the function that it claims, is its purpose.
Speaker 2: As I point out, when you got Frank Czipco, any institution,
Speaker 2: when you got bad people in it, they can be
Speaker 2: either incompetent, they can be psychologically unfit for the job,
Speaker 2: or they can be evil and vicious and deliberately malicious.
Speaker 2: In any of those cases, it's up to the institution
Speaker 2: to purge those people. And if the institution instead encircles
Speaker 2: them and embraces them because it doesn't want any criticism
Speaker 2: of its institution, folks, that is the point at which
Speaker 2: that institution needs to be abolished. And that is the
Speaker 2: case with ICE, the irs, with almost everyone of these
Speaker 2: federal agencies, they need to be abolished. And so it's
Speaker 2: also disturbing to say to see this and you know,
Speaker 2: when you look at Renee Good. What was the response
Speaker 2: of most of the people in the Maga cult. Well,
Speaker 2: they came after her with ad hominem attacks. Oh well,
Speaker 2: she was working with a group that got some Soros funding.
Speaker 2: She's a homosexual. And you know, I do not defend
Speaker 2: the LGBT agenda. I do not agree with it. I
Speaker 2: think it's degenerate. I think it is something that needs
Speaker 2: to be purged, but I don't think that people need
Speaker 2: to be shot because of it. And that was the
Speaker 2: tact that they were taking. While they say nothing at
Speaker 2: all about Scott Bessent every time something happens. Oh, look
Speaker 2: there's a Soros network there. Oh look Alex Pretty. Now
Speaker 2: I see this on Zero Edge. Alex Pretty was part
Speaker 2: of a six group those exchanging information about where the
Speaker 2: ICE agents were operating so people could go to film
Speaker 2: them and to blow whistles, which I hardly approve of,
Speaker 2: by the way. But they want to make that sound
Speaker 2: like some kind of a Soro's conspiracy. Hey, take a
Speaker 2: look at Scott Besson, the guy who was Soros's chief
Speaker 2: lieutenant for years. You don't have a problem with him,
Speaker 2: And we want to talk about homosexuality. You want to
Speaker 2: talk about his personal life. No, they completely ignore it.
Speaker 2: Just to imagine the double standard when they go on
Speaker 2: these full on ad hominem attacks and the double standard
Speaker 2: that is there, and then you have the attack on
Speaker 2: pretty who. The only thing they could come up with
Speaker 2: was he was carrying a gun, which he had gone
Speaker 2: to the trouble of jumping through all their hoops to
Speaker 2: get their permission for something that is a God given
Speaker 2: right that is protected under the Constitution. I would never, personally,
Speaker 2: I would never ask any government for permission to carry
Speaker 2: a gun. Never, never did it in my life, I
Speaker 2: would never do it in the future.
Speaker 1: He did.
Speaker 2: He's got more respect for the government than I do,
Speaker 2: so shoot me and that's the best they could do.
Speaker 2: And that was jumping the shark, because that showed what
Speaker 2: really this was headed for. You know, people have talked about, well,
Speaker 2: you know, not take a gun to a protest, as
Speaker 2: Scott Besson was saying. That was his little SoundBite that
Speaker 2: he had planned when he had that interview with Jonathan
Speaker 2: carl and people point out, well, you know you have
Speaker 2: that husband and wife mcclowsky. They stood there at a
Speaker 2: protest with guns. I remember the first time I saw
Speaker 2: that picture of the two of them, I thought it's photoshopped.
Speaker 2: They were holding those guns so awkwardly it was clear
Speaker 2: that they had never really used them, never really trained
Speaker 2: on them. As the most awkward looking thing I've ever
Speaker 2: seen in my life. So people have taken that photograph.
Speaker 2: And remember the mccluskeys were guests of keynote speakers at
Speaker 2: the Republican National Convention in twenty twenty, so some people
Speaker 2: put on it, gave it to Groc and had Groc animated.
Speaker 2: So they got these masked Ice agents with their Bella
Speaker 2: Clava's attack. The two of them knock them to the ground,
Speaker 2: take their guns and start beating them. And they did
Speaker 2: the same thing with Kyle Rittenhouse. He also took a
Speaker 2: gun to a protest and actually used it, and I'm
Speaker 2: not criticizing him for defending himself, but they have the
Speaker 2: masked Ice agents come and knock him to the ground,
Speaker 2: beat him and take his gun away, that type of thing.
Speaker 2: And then they said, if you don't stand up for
Speaker 2: the rights of other people, it's going to happen to you.
Speaker 2: That is exactly the issue. And I think some people
Speaker 2: saw that is where the militarized federal police of Donald
Speaker 2: Trump are headed. That's exactly where it is headed. They
Speaker 2: are anti Second Amendment. Federal government has always been about that.
Speaker 2: So Trump said, I don't like any shooting. I don't
Speaker 2: like it. But when somebody goes to a protest and
Speaker 2: he's got a gun, all right, stop right there, stop
Speaker 2: right there.
Speaker 3: You just jump the shark. Just jump the shark.
Speaker 2: As we point out, you know who is the aggressor
Speaker 2: and all this stuff, You tell me whoa this is.
Speaker 2: Somebody filming this, sitting in the car where all this
Speaker 2: stuff happened. You tell me who the aggressor is. We've
Speaker 2: seen this from the other angle, that guy grabbing, beating people,
Speaker 2: spraying him in the face, even if they're just standing there.
Speaker 2: Pushing that woman down and shoving her probably about ten feet.
Speaker 2: She fell into the snow. And as I pointed out,
Speaker 2: if Alex Pretty wanted to have a fight, he's got
Speaker 2: a gun. But he was also if you just want
Speaker 2: to have a fight, he was standing to the side
Speaker 2: of this guy when he shoved that woman. Instead, what
Speaker 2: Alex Pretty did was he stood in front of this aggressive,
Speaker 2: needlessly aggressive ice agent. Who hey, I've been told I
Speaker 2: can do anything I want by Christinome and Greg Bomino
Speaker 2: and Donald Trump. So he stood in front of him.
Speaker 2: I mean, if you wanted to fight this guy, you
Speaker 2: know you're going to give up the advantage of being
Speaker 2: able to push him from the side when he's not
Speaker 2: paying attention to him. You're going to stand in front
Speaker 2: of him. He was standing up to a bully, a
Speaker 2: bully that sprayed him in the face, sprayed other people
Speaker 2: in the face, and eventually killed him. That's what we're
Speaker 2: talking about here, folks. Trump again dodged the question on
Speaker 2: whether or not the Border Patrol agent did the right
Speaker 2: thing and the murder of Pretty, said, the administration is
Speaker 2: reviewing everything. No, the administration is not going to review anything.
Speaker 2: Roy seen jd Vance say, they've got absolute immunity. So
Speaker 2: if they got absolute immunity, why would you waste the time?
Speaker 2: And they have said that over and over again. Yeah,
Speaker 2: like the Epstein documents. The COVID inquiry is a JFK commission,
Speaker 2: the nine to eleven commission. They never investigating this stuff,
Speaker 2: especially if they know they committed the crime. Trump declined
Speaker 2: to answer two times when a Wall Street Journal reporter
Speaker 2: asked him if the Border Patrol agent who shot and
Speaker 2: killed Pretty did the right thing. Of course, he would
Speaker 2: say that he had avoided. Christin nom said that agents
Speaker 2: fired defensive shots at pretty because they feared for their lives. Well,
Speaker 2: you know, Robert Barnes has been pretty good about that.
Speaker 2: I was really surprised because usually he hangs around Alex,
Speaker 2: and Alex has gone Alex Jones has gone full on,
Speaker 2: one hundred percent justified. And of course he didn't have
Speaker 2: anything that he could tell you that was justified. Robert
Speaker 2: Barnes just simply said they had taken the gun from him,
Speaker 2: they shot him in the back. It's just that simple, folks.
Speaker 2: Jake Tapper responded to Christy Nome when she said while
Speaker 2: he fired defensive shots, he says he gave her a
Speaker 2: video of the shooting. He says, is that what you see?
Speaker 2: And then you had Bill Milou again again at Fox News, saying,
Speaker 2: since yesterday is deadly shooting in Minnesota. I've talked to
Speaker 2: more than half a dozen federal sources involved in immigration enforcement,
Speaker 2: including several and senior positions, who all tell me that
Speaker 2: they have grown increasingly uneasy and frustrated with some of
Speaker 2: the claims and narratives of DHS.
Speaker 3: Christy nom In particular.
Speaker 2: And of course people like Peewee German Steven Miller, who
Speaker 2: immediately called him terrorists and.
Speaker 3: Spun it his own way.
Speaker 2: The Wall Street Journals headline says, Miller and Nome dig
Speaker 2: in on immigration tactics, but political reckoning is coming Democrats
Speaker 2: demands on homeland security might bring a shutdown, and even
Speaker 2: within the Republican Party there's pushback against it, and especially
Speaker 2: with the people who are pro Second Amendment. And I'm
Speaker 2: not talking about the NRA. They just want power. They've
Speaker 2: sold out, just like the March for Life people have
Speaker 2: sold out. After the Trump administration restored tens of millions
Speaker 2: of dollars and funding for abortion to Plan Parenthood quietly
Speaker 2: without any announcement, it took a while for people to
Speaker 2: realize what happened. Some people say, well, why did the
Speaker 2: ACLU drop their lawsuit here? Oh, now we see what's happened.
Speaker 2: And so after they did that, and after it went
Speaker 2: public three days later, the March for Life People extended
Speaker 2: an invitation to Jdevance to be the keynote speaker. The
Speaker 2: people the administration that just restored the money to Planned
Speaker 2: Parenthood to kill babies going to make them the keynote
Speaker 2: speaker the March for Life. People know better than the
Speaker 2: National Rifle Association. So again new angle shows the federal
Speaker 2: agent clapping after Alex pretty killed and the Ice protest.
Speaker 3: I showed that clip to you.
Speaker 2: Christinom says, I don't know any peaceful protester that shows
Speaker 2: up with a gun and ammunition rather than a sign.
Speaker 2: I said it before, I'll see it again. I've been
Speaker 2: at many demonstrations, and so a fellow reporter's been at
Speaker 2: demonstrations where people carrying signs, they got attacked, they got kettled,
Speaker 2: they got arrested. Yeah, Rob Doo got kettled and arrested
Speaker 2: and tear gassed at an event that was a peaceful
Speaker 2: protest with signs. He actually got some good compensation in
Speaker 2: a lawsuit for them doing that, and he should have.
Speaker 2: But you know, when you go to the rally like
Speaker 2: the one of the Alamo, or you go to the
Speaker 2: Bundy Ranch standoff, those are peaceful.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: The Bundy Ranch standoff was right at the brink. You
Speaker 2: had these agents who were scared to death, and several
Speaker 2: of the people there in the audience, especially one guy
Speaker 2: used to be in law enforcement, said they're going to shoot.
Speaker 3: You know, they were like, you.
Speaker 2: Know, yelling threats through the bullhorn and you know, going
Speaker 2: full Marning five on us, and it was quite a
Speaker 2: possibility they could shoot. However they didn't. Why Why didn't
Speaker 2: they Because there are a lot of other people that
Speaker 2: had guns as well. And if you kick that off,
Speaker 2: it was on. They weren't going to get out of
Speaker 2: their live mutual assured destruction, folks, that's the way it
Speaker 2: needs to go. That's how you have a peaceful protest.
Speaker 2: That's how you have a country that is free. You
Speaker 2: have an armed citizenry, and that means that you've got
Speaker 2: an armed citizenry that peacefully protests, or you're not going
Speaker 2: to have peaceful protests. I've seen over and over again
Speaker 2: when only the cops have the guns, the protests are
Speaker 2: not peaceful. They start beating and shoving people, They start
Speaker 2: shooting people in the face of tear gas, and people
Speaker 2: are going to shove them back and then they're going
Speaker 2: to get hurt. But when everybody's carrying guns, it's polite
Speaker 2: for obvious reasons. I'm all for everybody carrying guns and
Speaker 2: openly doing it, and if you have enough people doing it,
Speaker 2: it works. Let's take a break here. There's other things
Speaker 2: I want to talk about. I don't want to talk
Speaker 2: about this all the time every day. Let's go with
Speaker 2: some of the comments here at Travis.
Speaker 4: Yeah, we've got Epstein Islands. Has imagine shooting a man
Speaker 4: ten times in the back and clapping after it's over.
Speaker 3: Yeah, isn't that amazing?
Speaker 4: Shelly a says. They already nullified the amendments years ago.
Speaker 4: They injected half the world with genetic engineering. Shows you
Speaker 4: have no rights in their eyes.
Speaker 3: That's right. Your cattle.
Speaker 2: And the people who are their soldiers and their police officers,
Speaker 2: they don't have respect for you either. Understand that.
Speaker 4: Guard Goldsmith says that is why Trump and others are
Speaker 4: pushing federal immigration policing as a way to unconstitutionally enter
Speaker 4: the States to further crush the Tenth Amendment and Article
Speaker 4: four Section four.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that really is the issue. They really do want
Speaker 2: to have this confrontation. That's why they're putting thousands of
Speaker 2: ICE agents. That's why he wants to deploy the military.
Speaker 2: That's why you've got people like Timpoole do the insurrection.
Speaker 2: I do the insurrection. I am Tommy Lauren at Fox News.
Speaker 2: They really want to kick off a civil war. And
Speaker 2: if they can't kick off a civil war, at least
Speaker 2: they can destroy completely the Tenth Amendment and these different
Speaker 2: the division of power that is legitimately there.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I've heard Timpoole called Timpoole the dim fool or.
Speaker 3: Beat baby, beatie baby. That's a good one.
Speaker 4: Yeah, stealth patriots has I never thought I would see
Speaker 4: a day when so called conservatives would cheer on the
Speaker 4: police state who are blatantly violating the constitution and criticize
Speaker 4: people who exercise their right to bear arms.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I never thought I would see that. At Info Wars,
Speaker 2: for example, I mean, Alex said the thing he was
Speaker 2: saying was hardcore one hundred and eighty degrees opposite of
Speaker 2: what he's saying now. And I put up something about
Speaker 2: the ice agents and things that they were doing, and
Speaker 2: had what's that, Jade Dryer?
Speaker 3: Is that his name?
Speaker 4: There is a guy named Jade Dyer.
Speaker 3: Okay, that's it. Yeah.
Speaker 2: His response to me was, Okay, Boomer, I'll tell you what, Jay,
Speaker 2: after you learn something, we can have a discussion. You
Speaker 2: don't know anything, nothing at all. If you're going to
Speaker 2: follow through this stuff, you have no idea where this
Speaker 2: is going to lead. You know nothing nothing, no history,
Speaker 2: no law, nothing. You're sharing this. Shame on you, baby,
Speaker 2: beanie baby. The rest of these people would call the
Speaker 2: ok boomer stuff. I don't care. I'm not you know,
Speaker 2: it's yeah. I've been around long enough to understand what
Speaker 2: you don't understand. Jay, that's the bottom line.
Speaker 4: Nathan Bedford Forrest eighteen sixty five says Reagan started this
Speaker 4: mess when he signed the first amnesty bill in nineteen
Speaker 4: eighty three. I remember it and where I was when
Speaker 4: I heard it. I was a California native since fifty seven.
Speaker 4: The floodgates opened up after that. Reagan was a true
Speaker 4: trader to conservative values. On almost every plank of a
Speaker 4: conservative platform, he betrayed it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, absolutely right, absolutely right.
Speaker 2: You know, Ron Paul was an early Reagan supporter, and
Speaker 2: Reagan was great when it came to speeches, obviously speeches
Speaker 2: about conservatism. And when he became president, Ron Paul strongly
Speaker 2: opposed everything he did. He blew up the deficit, he
Speaker 2: enacted gun control. It was more important to him that
Speaker 2: his press secretary got shot than to defend the Second Amendment.
Speaker 2: He betrayed conservative principles everywhere and of course, you know,
Speaker 2: after you find out what happened, and the fact that
Speaker 2: Bill Casey, one of the founders of the CIA, was
Speaker 2: basically his handler, his campaign manager, that bill Casey had
Speaker 2: set up not only Iran Contra scandal, but bill Casey
Speaker 2: had gone to Iran and told them, don't release the
Speaker 2: hostages until Reagan has sworn in. And if you do that,
Speaker 2: we will sell you the parts for the planes that
Speaker 2: we sold you a long time ago. And then they
Speaker 2: took that money and they used it for a secret
Speaker 2: war in Central America. And after that we had to
Speaker 2: crack cocaine epidemic that was created by these same people.
Speaker 2: It just, yeah, it was disgusting to see what he
Speaker 2: had done. But he was a great politician and no
Speaker 2: doubt about that. I mean the straight out of central casting.
Speaker 2: And you know, Reagan was playing a very different character,
Speaker 2: character that was likable and affable. Trump is playing a
Speaker 2: character for our times, a character that thrives on conflict
Speaker 2: and fighting. He is the professional wrestling character rather than
Speaker 2: the guy who's talking about mule team days or whatever
Speaker 2: it was that Reagan had borax commercials. He was the
Speaker 2: cowboy who was talking about our history that's the kind
Speaker 2: of character he played. Just to look at where we
Speaker 2: are right now, we can't even have a decent actor
Speaker 2: in the White House. At least Reagan could act, and
Speaker 2: he had a likable character. Can't say the same thing
Speaker 2: about this guy. Well, I'm going to take a break
Speaker 2: and we're going to kind of tone this down, and
Speaker 2: when we come back, we're going to talk about what's
Speaker 2: going on with gold and Silver. Over the weekend, I
Speaker 2: got away from all this stuff. Didn't want to hear
Speaker 2: it because it gets me upset, and I focused on
Speaker 2: putting together audio and a video of a song that
Speaker 2: I wrote about thirty something years ago, mid nineteen nineties,
Speaker 2: I guess, or early nineteen nineties, and something we used
Speaker 2: to do as part of our home Bible study with
Speaker 2: the people that.
Speaker 3: Would come there.
Speaker 2: And you'll probably recognize the tune, and if you're a Christian,
Speaker 2: you'll probably recognize the lyrics from Isaiah fifty five.
Speaker 6: As the rain and the snoot falls down from the
Speaker 6: heavens and wales the.
Speaker 3: And see.
Speaker 11: So the words of my.
Speaker 6: Mind with not reriturn empty, but to one high purpose.
Speaker 1: Sanly you in the come to.
Speaker 6: All you first come and drink the living water.
Speaker 1: Let those with.
Speaker 12: Down money steal perch, just sand drink, listen care lead to.
Speaker 6: Me that your soul mailing forever.
Speaker 12: Your soul will delight in work. Have to give pastor.
Speaker 11: And the snow.
Speaker 13: Goes down from the.
Speaker 12: Heavens and warders the fancy.
Speaker 13: So the water so my man.
Speaker 6: Will not lo return molty.
Speaker 13: But you upper said.
Speaker 3: Old, then we might know the Lord.
Speaker 6: They're a small lord to know him.
Speaker 12: He'll come like the spring rains, stand water.
Speaker 6: As the rain, and the snow falls down from the
Speaker 6: heavens and walder steeds and see so the words of
Speaker 6: my move we not riturn empty. But you were my
Speaker 6: purpose and lea you and peace. See the Lord while
Speaker 6: he's me. Call on him and he'll.
Speaker 12: Have a see his thoughts are not your god stars
Speaker 12: ways not like yours.
Speaker 13: Call on him while he's me, For he said, he'll.
Speaker 6: Freely pod siner.
Speaker 13: Turned from your ways, turn to.
Speaker 6: Me as the way, and the snow falls.
Speaker 13: Down from the hellenssts. So the world serve my mind.
Speaker 6: We'll not writturnnmty, but you world purbos and le.
Speaker 3: Due to.
Speaker 6: Me.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 11: That's right, boys and girls, there's a post election sale
Speaker 11: on silver and gold. Trump euphoria has caused a nip
Speaker 11: in silver and gold.
Speaker 1: It's time to.
Speaker 11: Buy some medals with via doors before they come to there.
Speaker 14: Since is go tonight don gold to get in touch
Speaker 14: with the wise wolf himself, Tony Harterburn, he knows where
Speaker 14: to look to find silver and gold.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and that may be more difficult to find now.
Speaker 2: That's things have really gotten crazy. Tony's trying to operate
Speaker 2: in an economy that is suffering hyperinflation. Gold and silver
Speaker 2: that commercial has aged pretty well, hasn't it travels well?
Speaker 2: Another day, another high. It was just at the end
Speaker 2: of the week last week that I checked the price
Speaker 2: of gold and it's like forty eight hundred dollars. Then
Speaker 2: like yesterday it's like it blew past fifty one hundred dollars.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's not just an all time high, it's
Speaker 2: it's just really accelerating. And of course silver I think
Speaker 2: got up to one hundred and ten dollars announce really
Speaker 2: amazing before people took some profits and it went back
Speaker 2: down to one hundred.
Speaker 3: What is going on with us?
Speaker 2: Well, in a word, Trump, it is thriving on the
Speaker 2: the weaponization of the dollar and the US financial system
Speaker 2: that began with Biden and Trump is continuing it, putting
Speaker 2: it on steroids. And of course Trump has created all
Speaker 2: kinds of conflict, I mean, even going to war with
Speaker 2: NATO over Greenland. And so when you look at that,
Speaker 2: you look at the unrest, the uncertainty, and the massive spending.
Speaker 2: He's stepping on the gas again. You know, he changed
Speaker 2: the slope of the accumulative debt when he was present
Speaker 2: back in twenty twenty with all the COVID nonsense, and
Speaker 2: he's doing it again now, fresh all time highs crossing
Speaker 2: fifty one hundred dollars an ounce on Monday, extending his
Speaker 2: record breaking run as investors seek the safety of gold
Speaker 2: amid rising geopolitical tensions and global fiscal risks. This is
Speaker 2: CNBC as a matter of fact, You've got CNBC talking
Speaker 2: about it, CBS talking about it. This is mainstream media
Speaker 2: talking about which says that this is going to get
Speaker 2: the retail trade fired up to jump into this. Prior
Speaker 2: to this, it's pretty much been people who realized what
Speaker 2: was happening to the financial system and the central banks
Speaker 2: and others who are driving this now if they bring
Speaker 2: in the retail trade. It's truly going to squeeze it up,
Speaker 2: isn't it. So spot goal price is gained two and
Speaker 2: a half percent before slightly pairing gains of the final trade,
Speaker 2: stopping at five thousand and eighty six. I remember just
Speaker 2: a couple of months ago you had most of the
Speaker 2: banks were saying, well, you know, probably get to forty
Speaker 2: five hundred dollars sometime in the first quarter of twenty
Speaker 2: twenty six. I said, I think that is way too conservative,
Speaker 2: And of course it didn't last very long before it
Speaker 2: blew through those Silver also rallied prices jumping nearly five
Speaker 2: percent four point nine percent to one hundred and seven
Speaker 2: dollars and ninety cents per ounce, And it was also
Speaker 2: benefiting from higher industrial demand because we have gone for
Speaker 2: six years without in terms of silver deficit, consuming more
Speaker 2: silver than is being produced. So again you've got some
Speaker 2: of these organizations like Union Boncare said that they have
Speaker 2: a target price of fifty two hundred dollars per ounce
Speaker 2: by the end of the year. What is going to
Speaker 2: change that would stop the rise of gold? Ask yourself
Speaker 2: that why would it only rise one hundred dollars for
Speaker 2: the rest of the year with all the chaos that
Speaker 2: is here. When it went up three hundred dollars last
Speaker 2: over the weekend, it's crazy. Goldman Sachs recently lifted it's
Speaker 2: December twenty twenty six gold price forecast to fifty four
Speaker 2: hundred dollars, an ounce up from a very conservative forty
Speaker 2: nine hundred dollars. That blew through that forty nine hundred
Speaker 2: dollars level. So again it is the frantic safe haven dems.
Speaker 2: And everything that Trump is doing is pouring gasoline on
Speaker 2: the fire that is. It's amazing to look at it.
Speaker 2: But at least there is a silver lining and all
Speaker 2: this stuff, and a goal lining as well. Prices have
Speaker 2: already risen about eighteen percent from the first of the
Speaker 2: year for gold and even more than that for silver.
Speaker 2: One of the things that happened, of course, that Trump
Speaker 2: did is on Saturday, after he got back from Davos,
Speaker 2: he was angry about what Mark Carney, the globalist central banker.
Speaker 2: This guy was head of the Bank of the Central
Speaker 2: Bank of Canada as well as the Bank of England.
Speaker 2: That's kind of an unusual feed. It tells you what
Speaker 2: a diet in the wool globalist he is but nevertheless
Speaker 2: he got Trump very upset because he was talking about
Speaker 2: doing a trade deal with China, and Trump and Bessett
Speaker 2: have said that, well, if they have a trade deal
Speaker 2: with China, then that's going to shut down on our
Speaker 2: terraffs because we can't control they're We're not going to
Speaker 2: be able to control any of this stuff. This is
Speaker 2: an illusion. This is This tariff war that Trump has
Speaker 2: gotten into is as futile and as stupid as the
Speaker 2: drug war. You can't restrict trade with threatening people. And
Speaker 2: we've got fifty years of that to prove it. And
Speaker 2: of course you can add in the alcohol prohibition stuff
Speaker 2: to prove it as well. And these price controls and
Speaker 2: sanctions and stuff never work, never work, especially on foreign countries.
Speaker 2: It is they are jousting at windmills if they think
Speaker 2: this is going to work. And so analysts have said
Speaker 2: that gold has more room to climb this year, potentially
Speaker 2: going to six thousand dollars on mounting global tensions and
Speaker 2: strong demand from central banks as well as now consumers
Speaker 2: because again, well this is newsmax, as I said CNBC, CBS, Newsmax.
Speaker 2: These are not you know, the trade papers that typically
Speaker 2: cover gold and silver. This is mainstream media now paying attention.
Speaker 2: I said it was going to happen after it hit
Speaker 2: five thousand, and said, you watch, everybody's going to be
Speaker 2: talking about it, and you watch what happens when Trump
Speaker 2: takes control of the Federal Reserve, whether he does it
Speaker 2: in latterly himself or he's got some puppet and they're
Speaker 2: like Pam Bondy or Cash Mattel who does whatever he wants.
Speaker 2: It's going to be everything he's going to do in
Speaker 2: terms of quantitative easying and lowering interest rates, and it's
Speaker 2: going to really be pouring gasoline on this fire that
Speaker 2: is happening there. So again, mainstream media is now paying
Speaker 2: a lot of attention to this stuff. But it's not
Speaker 2: just denollarization and global debt. It's also d fiatization. I
Speaker 2: guess we could say, right this is a move away
Speaker 2: from fiat issues. Spot silver went up to this one
Speaker 2: says higher and the other one said one hundred and
Speaker 2: seven and ninety cents. This one says one hundred and
Speaker 2: ten eleven announce and was up six or almost six percent.
Speaker 2: Silver climbed above one hundred for the first time on Friday,
Speaker 2: building on its record one hundred and forty seven percent
Speaker 2: rise last year, so again they had slightly different figures,
Speaker 2: but it is astounding. This is one of the most
Speaker 2: interesting things I saw about gold and silver. This is
Speaker 2: an article that came out on Friday before this recent
Speaker 2: shot in the arm because of Trump's threats of one
Speaker 2: hundred percent terraffs on Canada.
Speaker 1: Why do we need that?
Speaker 2: I mean, come on, seriously, you got Jack the Soviet
Speaker 2: goes to the border to try to make a case
Speaker 2: why we need to have a militrize border with Canada. Now,
Speaker 2: after all these years, it doesn't matter with these people,
Speaker 2: the lies about fentanyl and all the rest of this stuff.
Speaker 2: And again it's the arbitrary, capricious, on again, off again
Speaker 2: tariffs that Trump does all the time. And I think
Speaker 2: it's hopefully the Supreme Court is going to shut this
Speaker 2: thing down. I think it really doesn't help his case
Speaker 2: at all to illustrate why we don't want one person
Speaker 2: unilaterally changing tarphrase.
Speaker 3: He does it every day.
Speaker 2: He's changing something and radical swings and it's hurting American
Speaker 2: corporations and it's hurting American consumers as well. It's insane
Speaker 2: what he's doing. Hopefully the Supreme Court will shut it
Speaker 2: down anyway. The man who bought a billion dollars in
Speaker 2: physical silver before the rally, would you like to have
Speaker 2: had that trade?
Speaker 4: Right?
Speaker 2: So again, Goldman Sachs, head of Commodities, noted and said,
Speaker 2: there's clearly hot money that is involved. But first and foremost,
Speaker 2: gold is a central bank trade. It is a slow
Speaker 2: erosion of the dollar's exorbitant privilege rather than a sudden
Speaker 2: loss of confidence. That's what's really happening, he said. If
Speaker 2: you go back and you look at what Warren Buffett
Speaker 2: did in the late name teen nineties, he bet on silver,
Speaker 2: got one hundred and twenty nine point seven million ounces
Speaker 2: of physical silver about four thousand metric tons, just before
Speaker 2: the dot com bubble crash. And so this guy is
Speaker 2: basically doing s David Bateman, he's a founder of a
Speaker 2: company called Entrata. I didn't look that up to see
Speaker 2: what they do. Anyway, he revealed on X that he
Speaker 2: had purchased close to a billion dollars and precious metals
Speaker 2: over the past six months. He told his followers on
Speaker 2: X that he bought one and a half percent of
Speaker 2: the annual global silver supply, about twelve million ounces it's
Speaker 2: bigger by than what Warren Buffett did before the dot
Speaker 2: com crash. And listen to the reasons that he gave
Speaker 2: for this. This is what I found to be interesting, because, folks,
Speaker 2: this is the same thing that Tony Rderman and I
Speaker 2: have been telling you for a couple of years. Number One,
Speaker 2: he said, the global monetary system is about to collapse.
Speaker 2: It is the Great Reset. It is the base endgame
Speaker 2: that we're here at. Number two, he said, We've got
Speaker 2: the biggest credit bubble in history, three hundred trillion dollars,
Speaker 2: and of course forty trillion of that is here in America.
Speaker 2: He said that is going to pop soon. He said
Speaker 2: there's no way the US can refinance it's and the
Speaker 2: time he wrote this twenty eight trillion dollars that maybe
Speaker 2: that was a mistake because he didn't make this trade
Speaker 2: that long ago. It might have been thirty eight trillion.
Speaker 2: There's no way the US can refinance its deficit and
Speaker 2: maturing treasuries in the next four years without an obscene
Speaker 2: amount of printing.
Speaker 3: Right, You got that.
Speaker 2: Trump's tariffs are hastening the collapse, and he said it's
Speaker 2: by design. Trump is part of the Great Reset. Crowd
Speaker 2: at Davos. If you didn't see that, you're not paying attention.
Speaker 2: But it's pretty clearly on display. It was as much
Speaker 2: on display as these ice killing videos that are out there.
Speaker 2: A lot of people refuse to see it because they
Speaker 2: come in with blinders and preconceptions. But Trump is a
Speaker 2: globalist and he is enacting the great reset by design
Speaker 2: in the same way that he kicked off predictive programming
Speaker 2: for universal basic income with the COVID lockdowns and things
Speaker 2: like that, and put us on an accelerated path to disaster. Financially,
Speaker 2: he says. Also, gold and silver are the only meaningful
Speaker 2: life raft and we're talking about financial The only real
Speaker 2: is the Lord Jesus Christ. But he's talking about things
Speaker 2: of this world, he says, and physical possession of it
Speaker 2: is everything.
Speaker 3: He said.
Speaker 2: The whole world right now is a sophisticated game of
Speaker 2: musical chairs. The chairs are precious metals. Crypto, he said,
Speaker 2: is a syop. Those who purchase it will have no
Speaker 2: chair when the music stops. Do you understand that you
Speaker 2: need to understand that real estate, crypto, stocks, and bonds
Speaker 2: will all lose significantly compared to precious metals. And finally,
Speaker 2: he said, the banking system has been meticulously designed to
Speaker 2: seize your assets to buoy up a collapsing banking sector.
Speaker 2: You have zero counter party risk with precious metals. And
Speaker 2: let me tell you it's not just the current existing
Speaker 2: banking system, but everything that Trump did as part of
Speaker 2: the Genius Act is set up to seize your bank
Speaker 2: account and your money. That's what they're moving toward. So
Speaker 2: earlier today, shortly after silver jumped above one hundred dollars,
Speaker 2: and that was the end of last weekend, he posted
Speaker 2: on X congratulations to everyone on one hundred dollars silver.
Speaker 2: Couldn't have happened to a better group of degenerate, mildly
Speaker 2: autistic misfits. So I guess that's where we fit here.
Speaker 2: I don't know, but now it's one hundred and ten
Speaker 2: dollars I got up to yesterday. We'll see what happens
Speaker 2: to it, but it's people will take some profits, but
Speaker 2: the momentum is back for silver. That's what Kitko, which
Speaker 2: covers the precious metals, that's their headlines silver one hundred dollars.
Speaker 2: Momentum is king. They said. Being wrong is a lesson
Speaker 2: that the market enjoys. Teaching repeatedly, and that is, you know,
Speaker 2: not seeing it continuing up. People getting skittish about it,
Speaker 2: saying it's had a big run. I don't know to
Speaker 2: keep this up. Well, the says silver hit a major
Speaker 2: milestone target of one hundred dollars an ounce, Gold reached
Speaker 2: the five thousand dollars level. Well here they say, hasn't
Speaker 2: reached the five thousand dollars level yet, but the market
Speaker 2: is looking that way. What a difference to day makes, right,
Speaker 2: a couple of days, he goes to forty eight hundred
Speaker 2: and fifty one. Between times I looked at it, gold
Speaker 2: and silver rallied to one hundred dollars and five thousand
Speaker 2: dollars supported by strong fundamentals. That's why I did that commercial.
Speaker 2: After Trump's election, he had gone around, he'd curried favor
Speaker 2: with the crypto crowd because he wanted to make a
Speaker 2: lot of money. It's exactly the kind of scam that
Speaker 2: he likes to be a part of. And they came
Speaker 2: out with their own meme coins and all the rest
Speaker 2: of this stuff. But the reality was that the things
Speaker 2: that were driving gold and silver at that time, none
Speaker 2: of those things were changing. As we said, they're only
Speaker 2: going to get worse with Trump in office, and they did,
Speaker 2: they did, and it's only going to get worse in
Speaker 2: the next year. I'm afraid that's the one thing that
Speaker 2: you can do to protect yourself. So again, breaking five
Speaker 2: thousand dollars an ounce a record price, says CBS, everything
Speaker 2: that you now need to know. And so they are
Speaker 2: writing to the retail investor, those of us who not
Speaker 2: necessarily those of us, because these are people who have
Speaker 2: not been paying attention, and these are people who don't
Speaker 2: want to know about gold as it hits the five
Speaker 2: thousand dollars announce mark. So now CBS is going to
Speaker 2: give them a primer about gold. And they don't really
Speaker 2: get to any of the fundamentals. They say, why is
Speaker 2: it continuing to break price records? Well, they really don't know,
Speaker 2: you know, they're looking at this as if it's just
Speaker 2: some kind of a fad. No, it's part of a
Speaker 2: worldwide financial reset that is happening. They don't get into that.
Speaker 2: Should I wait for the price to drop in order
Speaker 2: to invest in it? Well, they said, said CBS. If
Speaker 2: all the aforementioned factors weren't prevalent right now, then waiting
Speaker 2: for a small price drop to get invested in gold
Speaker 2: could make sense, but that's not the climate investors are
Speaker 2: operating in currently. Historically, price drops that do materialize here
Speaker 2: are relatively small and short lived, so waiting for those
Speaker 2: to appear isn't the best way to approach a gold
Speaker 2: investment right now. In other words, fundamentals have not changed.
Speaker 2: You know you're gonna have noise, but the trend lines
Speaker 2: are well established and nothing fundamental has changed to change
Speaker 2: those trends.
Speaker 3: Well, you have.
Speaker 2: An article on zero Hedge from Rabobank saying what we're
Speaker 2: experiencing now is not D dollarization but D fiatization. JP
Speaker 2: Morgan wants famously remarked that gold is money and everything
Speaker 2: else is credit. Now this is the real JP Morgan.
Speaker 2: This is not the corporation that's taking his place. It's
Speaker 2: not the position of Gmie demon forgotten. During the nineteen
Speaker 2: eighties and nineteen nineties. This was as goals share central
Speaker 2: bank reserves steadily declined and goal prices for most of
Speaker 2: that period did the same. That period was the most
Speaker 2: recent era of high financialization. Were Hollywood movies like Wall Street,
Speaker 2: Trading Places, Barbarians at the Gate, even pretty women glorified
Speaker 2: the swashbuckling lifestyles of financiers. It's reasonably clear from the
Speaker 2: data that this period ended with the popping of the
Speaker 2: dot com bubble. So but the final eulogy was not
Speaker 2: read until the financial crisis of two thousand and eight,
Speaker 2: when the excesses of high financialization were truly laid bare.
Speaker 2: All this securitization of real estate and things like that.
Speaker 2: Now you've got the guy Larry Fink, who made his
Speaker 2: fortune off of the dot off of the two thousand
Speaker 2: and eight crash and the securitization and all the rest
Speaker 2: of this stuff. He is now he made his fortunate
Speaker 2: black Rock, and he's now the head of Davos, and
Speaker 2: he was making speeches about how the future is all
Speaker 2: about tokenization, the guy who made a fortune off of securitization.
Speaker 2: That's why physical cokes is king. Don't accept any substitutes,
Speaker 2: especially from people like Larry Fink. Well, it's typical to
Speaker 2: think of the financial crisis as an epic that is
Speaker 2: ending goals. Share of central bank reserves hit its nate
Speaker 2: air around the year two thousand. That was also the
Speaker 2: approximate high water mark for the US Treasury bond's share
Speaker 2: of global reserve assets. Many Western central banks had recently
Speaker 2: offloaded their holdings at low low prices in the late
Speaker 2: nineteen nineties, having been taken in by fashionable ideas such
Speaker 2: as gold is a barbarous relic and the creation of
Speaker 2: the Fiat monetary system and the floating exchange rates in
Speaker 2: nineteen seventy one made holding gold a quaint anachronism. Fast
Speaker 2: forward to today, and gold is trading well above five
Speaker 2: thousand dollars an ounce, silver is trading well above one
Speaker 2: hundred dollars an ounce, and the financial has given way
Speaker 2: to the material, and the fashionable narrative is now sell America,
Speaker 2: sell dollarization. Trump's abracist style of foreign policy offends traditional allies,
Speaker 2: and in seeming support of the sell America narrative, the
Speaker 2: Bloomberg Dollar spot index is down one point four percent
Speaker 2: a year to date, while gold is up eighteen percent.
Speaker 2: On the other hand of the ledger, we continue to
Speaker 2: see strong demand at US Treasury auctions and the Swift
Speaker 2: data the Swift data is the system by which they
Speaker 2: transfer payments, shows that the use of the US dollar
Speaker 2: in international payments is actually increasing, mostly at the expense
Speaker 2: of the Euro. So why is that happening. That's why
Speaker 2: he says it's not de dollarization, but it's de fiatization.
Speaker 2: Speaking to the media at Davos, ray Dalio argued that
Speaker 2: what we are experiencing is not de dollarization, but de fiatization,
Speaker 2: the flight from fiat currencies in favor of real assets,
Speaker 2: real money in the form of gold and silver. Ray
Speaker 2: Dalio pointed out that quote in a warlike environment, countries
Speaker 2: don't want to hold each other's debt for fear of sanctions,
Speaker 2: for example of what happened with Russia, what we see
Speaker 2: happening with Iran, and so on forth and so on.
Speaker 2: Investors don't want to hold financial claims for fear of
Speaker 2: debasement through deficit spending by national governments and debt monetization
Speaker 2: quantitative easing in other words, and you're going to see
Speaker 2: that on steroids when Trump takes control of the Federal Reserve.
Speaker 2: It is rational to hold neutral money with no counterparty risk,
Speaker 2: no risk of debasement, and less scope for the imposition
Speaker 2: of capital controls. The last sellers of scale, that is,
Speaker 2: the central banks, became the first buyers of scale in
Speaker 2: twenty twenty four and twenty twenty five, but the trade
Speaker 2: is now broadened out to other buyers, and it looks
Speaker 2: like it's going to broaden out to consumers now in
Speaker 2: the general market because of the publicity that is being
Speaker 2: given because they broke one hundred dollars and five thousand dollars.
Speaker 2: Those are real psychological issues with that. The debasement of
Speaker 2: fiat currencies is now easy to spot. Aside from gold
Speaker 2: and silver regularly resetting all time highs, the Bloomberg Commodity
Speaker 2: Index has surged to sit at its highest level since
Speaker 2: mid twenty twenty two. Crude price is a risen for
Speaker 2: the last five weeks straight. Natural gas prices listen to this,
Speaker 2: have gone up by sixty five percent year to date.
Speaker 2: You're gonna see power bills going up. There gonna be
Speaker 2: a lot of inflation like that. And you know, that's
Speaker 2: one of the interesting things. I wonder if the price
Speaker 2: of power builds is even factored in to the federal
Speaker 2: government's consumer price indings. They have a funny way of
Speaker 2: excluding very expensive things like insurance or taxes or things
Speaker 2: like this, power bills and things like that, So I'm
Speaker 2: not really sure that's factored in. These types of moves
Speaker 2: signal a scarcity of the material relative to the financial.
Speaker 2: As Dalio explained, the flip side of a trade imbalance
Speaker 2: is a capital imbalance with the US, and this is
Speaker 2: why he says it's not a de dollarization but a defiatization.
Speaker 2: With the US running record current accounts in early twenty
Speaker 2: twenty five, it's a matter of mathematics that foreign investors
Speaker 2: have to buy US treasuries for that deficit to be financed.
Speaker 2: For the US to make progress on reducing its trade
Speaker 2: deficit as it has recently, it must also make progress
Speaker 2: on reducing its capital account surplus. That means fewer dollars
Speaker 2: for the rest of the world who rely on dollars
Speaker 2: to conduct trade. So are you going to get the
Speaker 2: Chinese currency into the hands of other countries? How are
Speaker 2: you going to do that unless China runs a trade deficit.
Speaker 3: You see.
Speaker 2: What Trump is doing in terms of trying to stop
Speaker 2: the trade deficit and paying absolutely no attention to the
Speaker 2: federal government's budget deficit, is exactly the opposite of what
Speaker 2: he needs to be doing. That is, he's driving this
Speaker 2: country into the ground financially, just like he did his casinos.
Speaker 2: It's actually kind of funny if you look at it.
Speaker 2: I mean we're going to suffer from this, but it
Speaker 2: is so amazingly stupid as humorous anyway, Central governments will
Speaker 2: not return to the gold standard for the same reason
Speaker 2: the last vessiges of the gold standard were abandoned in
Speaker 2: the first place. A gold standard constrains government's freedom to
Speaker 2: engage in deficit spending and to create inflation. So they're
Speaker 2: not going to go back to a gold standard. But
Speaker 2: reality is going to catch up to them. It's going
Speaker 2: to be difficult for us. But folks, the only hope
Speaker 2: that we have is the collapse of the dollar and
Speaker 2: the Federal Reserve, because that's what has given the federal
Speaker 2: government its superpowers in terms of bribing and blackmailing domestically
Speaker 2: as well as foreign governments. It's the only thing that's
Speaker 2: going to restrain American power is the collapse of the
Speaker 2: dollar standard, the collapse of Isaiah. Clearly, the world is
Speaker 2: erecting new barriers to the free movement of goods and
Speaker 2: Canadian Prime Mister Carney has become the Darling of Davos
Speaker 2: by delivering a speech articling articulating the changes in the
Speaker 2: world order and attempting to rally mid powers to band
Speaker 2: together and stand against the great power coercion. Carney was
Speaker 2: delivering jabs the US, but the credibility of his message
Speaker 2: may have been disminished somewhat by his actions in signing
Speaker 2: an agreement with China to reduce Canada's one hundred percent
Speaker 2: tariff on Chinese electric vehicles in exchange for reduction in
Speaker 2: Chinese tariffs on Canadian canola and seafood products. And this
Speaker 2: outraged the Trump administration, so Trump came up with his
Speaker 2: one hundred percent tariff on all things Canada. Scott Bessant
Speaker 2: explained the tariff threat by making it clear that Canada's
Speaker 2: deal was not acceptable. He said, we have a high
Speaker 2: integrated market with Canada, so why did you put terraffs
Speaker 2: on it in the first place? Right, We kept saying
Speaker 2: that that doesn't make any sense for the US to
Speaker 2: put terraffs on Canada. He said, goods crossed the border
Speaker 2: sometimes six times during the manufacturing process. When we talked
Speaker 2: about this, I said, this is like a vat tax,
Speaker 2: the tariff, because every time he's crossing the border back
Speaker 2: and forth, Trump is going to put a tariff on it.
Speaker 2: That makes absolutely no sense. That doesn't help our manufacturers
Speaker 2: at all anyway, So it goes they can cross the
Speaker 2: border six times during the manufacturing process. We can't let
Speaker 2: Canada become an opening that the Chinese pour their cheap
Speaker 2: goods into the United States. I'll tell you, Bessent and
Speaker 2: Trump have lost the plot, folks, They have completely lost it.
Speaker 2: The geostrategic competition between China and the US continues to
Speaker 2: be prosecuted as a trade war, but investors may do
Speaker 2: well to heed Dalio's warning that punishment in the forum
Speaker 2: of a global capital war is on the horizon.
Speaker 3: Everywhere you look.
Speaker 2: Trump wants war war in terms of financial issues, real
Speaker 2: wars domestically in foreign It truly is amazing, and that's
Speaker 2: one of the reasons why gold and silver are doing
Speaker 2: so well. The gold rally is fundamentally about trust. That's
Speaker 2: the issue. People are losing trust in America and rightfully so.
Speaker 2: And that's why you had another organization. Group of analysts
Speaker 2: are saying six thousand dollars gold, our gold says Germany
Speaker 2: is no longer safe and the federally serves vaults. German
Speaker 2: lawmakers and economists are renewing their calls to repatriate sovereign gold.
Speaker 2: What about all that stuff about auditing Fort Knox. I mean,
Speaker 2: do Americans believe that our gold is still there? Do
Speaker 2: Americans believe that our gold is safe and the vaults
Speaker 2: of the Federal Reserve somewhere. In the wake of Trump's
Speaker 2: Davos showdown with Europe over Greenland, German lawmakers and leading
Speaker 2: economists are once again calling for the country to get
Speaker 2: its billions in gold reserves out of the United States,
Speaker 2: citing the recent rupture and the risky behavior of the
Speaker 2: Trump administration. Given the current geopolitical situation, it seems risky
Speaker 2: to keep our gold in the US, said a leading
Speaker 2: economist and former head of Bundesbank Head of Research, Emanuel Munk,
Speaker 2: told the German press on Friday. He said, in the
Speaker 2: interests of greater strategic independence from the US, the Bundesbank
Speaker 2: would therefore be well advised to consider repatriating the gold.
Speaker 2: Germany has thirty three hundred tons in total sovereign gold reserves,
Speaker 2: second only to the eight thousand tons held by the US,
Speaker 2: but about thirty seven percent of German reserves are stored
Speaker 2: at the Federal Reserve in New York. The reality is
Speaker 2: is that nobody really knows what any of these central
Speaker 2: banks have in terms of gold, they don't get audited,
Speaker 2: and they also only declare certain purchases. As Tony has
Speaker 2: said many times, a lot of people believe that China's
Speaker 2: got way more gold than it talks about. Personally, they
Speaker 2: mine gold, they don't count that, they just put it
Speaker 2: into their central bank. Trump is unpredictable, say the Germans,
Speaker 2: he says, it's German economists and they do everything to
Speaker 2: generate conflict. That's why our gold is no longer safe
Speaker 2: in the Federal Reserve's vaults. What happens if the Greenland
Speaker 2: provocation continues, he said, And then you have the finance
Speaker 2: spokesperson for the opposition party of the Green Party in
Speaker 2: Germany's parliament has called for the gold to be brought
Speaker 2: back as well. So you've got a couple of different
Speaker 2: political parties that are calling for the repatriation.
Speaker 3: Of the goal.
Speaker 2: Again, this all has to do with the chaos of Trump.
Speaker 2: Chaos has consequences, folks, Bovino says, don't call me a gestapo,
Speaker 2: or I'll show you what a gestapo is like.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 2: Well, that's the situation with Trump, the reelection of Trump
Speaker 2: and the aggressive, unpredictable international policies that he's championed have
Speaker 2: stacked anxiety, stoked it brother with Germany's reserves throughout the
Speaker 2: last year, concerns that the US is no longer a
Speaker 2: reliable partner. Why would they think that, I mean, he's
Speaker 2: only making crazy statements about everything and attacking everybody. So
Speaker 2: beginning in twenty thirteen, they started talking about bringing it back.
Speaker 2: But again, Bank of America has had the has the
Speaker 2: highest estimation of any of these conservative institutions. Bank of
Speaker 2: America sees goal old price hitting six thousand dollars an
Speaker 2: ounce by spring of this year. Wait a minute, that's
Speaker 2: just a couple of months from now. Yeah, And why
Speaker 2: do they say that. They said they've got the most
Speaker 2: aggressive price forecast of any major institution. They said they
Speaker 2: based their projection on a falling supply of gold, that
Speaker 2: gold is not keeping up with demand, as well as
Speaker 2: rising costs in the gold sector. The thirteen major North
Speaker 2: American gold miners produced nineteen million ounces this year, they said,
Speaker 2: and that is down two percent from twenty twenty five.
Speaker 2: So because of that, that's yet another thing that they've
Speaker 2: added to the equation. So they think that gold is
Speaker 2: going to go up to six thousand in just a
Speaker 2: couple of months spring of twenty twenty six. So again
Speaker 2: we have seen these projections for most of these banks
Speaker 2: have been extremely conservative. And so now they're talking about
Speaker 2: six thousand dollars now. So Bank of America so one
Speaker 2: forecastor said it would take a fifty five percent increase
Speaker 2: in investment demand to drive gold prices to eight thousand
Speaker 2: dollars an ounced next year. But we'll see what happens
Speaker 2: with it. Absolutely is crazy what is happening right now.
Speaker 2: And central banks, they said the ideal situation is for
Speaker 2: central banks on average to have thirty percent of reserves
Speaker 2: in gold. Right now on average they're about half of that.
Speaker 2: So it doesn't look like the central bank buying is
Speaker 2: going to stop anytime soon either. And as artist says,
Speaker 2: the monetary system is broken and gold knows why. But
Speaker 2: I just before I leave this, I just want to
Speaker 2: say one thing about stable coins. This is first we
Speaker 2: see this article on zero edge and praise of stable coins,
Speaker 2: a quiet revolution in finance, and I would say, or
Speaker 2: is it a scam? With geopolitics taking center stage? The
Speaker 2: seismic tremors of stable coin activity go largely unnoticed. Stable
Speaker 2: coins sit at a fascinating intersection of finance and technology,
Speaker 2: I would say, of finance and the technocracy. And so
Speaker 2: you've got FIAT backed stable coins. They want to talk
Speaker 2: about dominating the market. And as we said before, it's
Speaker 2: not a coin, right, so a crypto token. So stable
Speaker 2: coins are not a coin. And if they're based on
Speaker 2: the US dollar, they're not stable. So if it starts
Speaker 2: out the very name is a lie. They point out.
Speaker 2: The Genius Act, proclaimed by Trump to have been named
Speaker 2: after himself, was signed into law July twenty twenty five,
Speaker 2: created a federal framework for stable coins. The Act prohibits
Speaker 2: stable coin issuers from paying interest to holders, but there
Speaker 2: are ways around that. And if you want to know
Speaker 2: what a criminal genius Trump is, just take a look
Speaker 2: at this while you slept. Tether And again, this is
Speaker 2: the company that is so closely you know, this is
Speaker 2: a lucky loutnix company, right, Tether. It just obliterated one
Speaker 2: hundred and eighty two million dollars poof gone.
Speaker 3: Right, I forget what it is.
Speaker 4: But a sizable portion, a noticeable percentage of all the
Speaker 4: money in the world runs through Tether.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, and they can just make it disappear They
Speaker 2: can flush your bank account and your cash down the
Speaker 2: memory hole, in the same way that Google can make
Speaker 2: you disappear if you're journalists that they don't like. In
Speaker 2: the blink of an eye, one hundred and eighty two
Speaker 2: million dollars worth of tether simply ceased to function. The
Speaker 2: funds weren't stolen by a hacker and a hoodie. They
Speaker 2: weren't lost in a tragic boating accident involving a misplaced
Speaker 2: private key, but they were instead obliterated by a few
Speaker 2: keystrokes from a centized administrator acting on a voluntary request
Speaker 2: from law enforcement. There was no public warrant, no judge's signature,
Speaker 2: certainly no due process for the owners of those five wallets.
Speaker 2: Just like that, nearly a quarter of a billion dollars
Speaker 2: was rendered dust, proving once and for all that if
Speaker 2: your money requires permission to spend it, it was never
Speaker 2: really your money to begin with. Again, this is the
Speaker 2: scam that is at the center of Donald Trump's purposely
Speaker 2: designed Great Reset Financial Reset. They want to switch you
Speaker 2: into stable coin. People caught on to the Central Bank
Speaker 2: digital currency scam, so they renamed it, and they talked
Speaker 2: about all the different features that house is going to
Speaker 2: be so easy to clear these transactions and everything. But
Speaker 2: they made sure that they had the ability to do
Speaker 2: this to shut down your account, just like they want
Speaker 2: to shut down your car. Do you understand what these
Speaker 2: people are about. This wasn't a glitch. Rather, it was
Speaker 2: a feature that had been meticulously crafted by the very
Speaker 2: people claiming to protect investors. Tether's decision to freeze these
Speaker 2: assets wasn't an anomaly, but the perfectly functioning result of
Speaker 2: their voluntary wallet freezing policy, a draconian measure that they
Speaker 2: rolled out in December of twenty twenty three. They have
Speaker 2: even formalized this tyranny through the T three Financial Crime Unit,
Speaker 2: a dystopian public private partnership. The Unholy Trinity exists for
Speaker 2: one purpose, to proactively identify and to freeze funds before
Speaker 2: a crime is even proven in court. How many times
Speaker 2: have we seen this? Right? This is the civil asset
Speaker 2: forfeiture applied to your bank account. We're not going to
Speaker 2: find you guilty. We just take the cash and do
Speaker 2: the due process later, maybe if we ever get around
Speaker 2: to it. Take the gun, or take the house, to
Speaker 2: take everything. Trump is the perfect embodiment of his policies
Speaker 2: the perfect embodiment of this eradication of due process. You know,
Speaker 2: we kill the people in the boats. We don't know
Speaker 2: who they are. We just you know, we'll figure it
Speaker 2: out later. We'll circle back and kill the people who's shipwrecked.
Speaker 2: We'll take your car. We'll charge the car with the crime.
Speaker 2: This is something that's been going on for a very
Speaker 2: long time. It didn't start with Trump, but Trump is
Speaker 2: metastasizing this on steroids. So this has been around for
Speaker 2: a long time. Civil asset forfiture and also the public
Speaker 2: private partnership aspect. Well, I'm not censoring you as the government.
Speaker 2: The government is prohibited from censorship. Try to tell that
Speaker 2: to Trump. Right, he thinks he can take licenses and
Speaker 2: shut people down. That's how bad he is. But the
Speaker 2: other guy is a little bit more clever than that. Oh,
Speaker 2: we're not going to directly go against the First Amendment. Instead,
Speaker 2: what we will do is we'll use corporations. We do
Speaker 2: business with these corporations, and they're going to do what
Speaker 2: we want to do so that they can have more
Speaker 2: business with us. It's going to be bribery and blackmail.
Speaker 2: So the same thing that Trump did with COVID, he
Speaker 2: bribed and blackmailed hospitals corporations. Biden did it as well.
Speaker 2: If you got contracts with the government, Biden said, you're
Speaker 2: going to get all your employees vaccinated or fired, or
Speaker 2: we're going to take away your contracts. And so that's
Speaker 2: the kind of thing that Trump is doing with the governors,
Speaker 2: both Democrat and Republican, and so, as they point out
Speaker 2: in this Freethought Project article here it said this legislation
Speaker 2: and the Genius Act that was there was a trojan
Speaker 2: horse for financial martial law.
Speaker 3: That's what it is.
Speaker 2: Under the guise of consumer protection. The Genius Act of
Speaker 2: Trump mandated a technical capability to freeze and seize assets.
Speaker 2: Remember that freeze and sees. That's what these people are about.
Speaker 2: While the Justice Departments high fives for freezing one hundred
Speaker 2: and eighty two million dollars without a warrant, the Pentagon
Speaker 2: continues to fail audit after audit. They're unable to account
Speaker 2: for trillions of taxpayer dollars that vanish into the black
Speaker 2: hole of a military industrial complex. They also are not
Speaker 2: only is the government the largest money launder and arms
Speaker 2: dealer on the planet, but they're also the biggest drug dealer.
Speaker 2: While they create their drug war. That is the criminality
Speaker 2: and the hypocrisy of the American government. The infrastructure for
Speaker 2: a digital prison has been built. It has been codified
Speaker 2: by the Genius Act, and it has been tested by
Speaker 2: Larry Lutnik, the Commerce Secretary's tether. They can and will
Speaker 2: turn off your money if you step out of line.
Speaker 2: The time to opt out of this system is now
Speaker 2: before the next freeze targets you. Freedom is not something
Speaker 2: that'll be given to us by politicians in Washington. It
Speaker 2: is something that we must take by using the tools
Speaker 2: that make tyranny obsolete again. You know, Tony has been
Speaker 2: spot on with all this stuff. You can get to
Speaker 2: wise Wolf Tony Ardaban's business where you can buy gold
Speaker 2: and silver. You can put it and put your Ira
Speaker 2: into this. You can also start to accumulate it on
Speaker 2: a regular basis. Wolf Pack is something that is unique
Speaker 2: to what Tony does. And of course you can handle
Speaker 2: gold or silver transactions of any size that you want,
Speaker 2: so you can take physical possession of it. And again,
Speaker 2: if you go to David Knightdy Gold that I'll let
Speaker 2: him know that you're coming from us, and that'll take
Speaker 2: you to Tony Ardban wise. Well, if we're going to
Speaker 2: take a quick break, folks, and we come back, I'm
Speaker 2: almost out of time, but I want to cover what
Speaker 2: Trump is doing with his peace board because I think
Speaker 2: that is very, very important in terms of understanding who
Speaker 2: this guy is. And it's it truly is amazing if
Speaker 2: you look at him as the founding father of the
Speaker 2: technocracy that is trying to unravel the constitution and our
Speaker 2: system of government that we currently have. We'll be right back, folks,
Speaker 2: at any.
Speaker 1: Using free speech to free minds. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: All right, welcome back, and I want to talk about
Speaker 2: Trump's board of piece. It is very telling you. It's
Speaker 2: an excellent article at The New American from Veronica Carolinko.
Speaker 2: I think, as we pronounced her last name, she has
Speaker 2: done excellent research on several things, and she's not afraid
Speaker 2: to criticize Trump when he needs to be criticized. And
Speaker 2: this is a very eye opening article. It turns out
Speaker 2: that what Trump did this is a charter that basically
Speaker 2: defines his character and his perspective on governance. It's basically
Speaker 2: a dictatorship. But before we get into it, we've got
Speaker 2: a couple of things we do want to respond to
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 4: Bob of Atlantis gifted a sub on Rumble, So I
Speaker 4: want to say thank you to Yes.
Speaker 3: Thanks, we really do appreciate ciate it.
Speaker 4: And Guard Goldsmith says Trump last week announced that he
Speaker 4: was pumping another two hundred billion into Fanny and Freddy
Speaker 4: to have them buy bundled mortgages.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he's gonna play financial tricks, so then fixing the
Speaker 2: fundamental problem.
Speaker 4: He also says Trump got the EU to harm their
Speaker 4: own currency and block Russian energy, harm European productivity to
Speaker 4: help make the dollar relatively less ugly compared to the euro.
Speaker 3: And the pound. Yeah. Yeah, It's always about the optics,
Speaker 3: isn't it.
Speaker 2: I want to thank people who have sent us some
Speaker 2: contributions by mail, and I haven't updated the gas gage jet,
Speaker 2: but I do want to thank a very generous contribution
Speaker 2: from Eileen K. Thank you very much, and Tom and
Speaker 2: Nancy K thank you also very much. Always there and
Speaker 2: strong supporters, thank you so much. And I'm Marty, thank you, Marty,
Speaker 2: appreciate that. Steven, I'm sorry, Stephanie K. David and Deborah W.
Speaker 2: David and Anne Marie in And then we have several errands.
Speaker 2: We've got Aaron W and Oregon, and Aaron W in Connecticut,
Speaker 2: and then we have an Aaron F in Oregon. So
Speaker 2: thank you, Aaron, thank you all of you, and I
Speaker 2: really do appreciate your sport. We're getting close to the
Speaker 2: end of the month. I need to take a look
Speaker 2: at where the gas gage is. But thank you so much.
Speaker 2: Let's take a look though, what Trump is doing with
Speaker 2: his Board of Peace. I joked that you had Peggy Noonan,
Speaker 2: who was a speechwriter for Ronald Reagan. She works at
Speaker 2: the Wall Street Journal now she said, this guy just
Speaker 2: can't stand peace and quiet. Well, Peggy, that's not what
Speaker 2: this is about. Conflict and war and chaos and all that.
Speaker 2: This is how he controls the narrative, and he governs
Speaker 2: by declaring emergencies. He tries to create an emergency and
Speaker 2: then say, well, because there's an emergency, I'm going to
Speaker 2: do executive orders to govern. It's all a tactic, that's
Speaker 2: what it's. It's not just that he wants to make
Speaker 2: things interesting for himself now, not at all. So at
Speaker 2: the World Economic Forum in Davos, he unveiled his his
Speaker 2: new international organization, the Peace Board, or the Board of Peace,
Speaker 2: I should say spelled. It could spell that as bo
Speaker 2: r ed. Look, folks, he is a globalist, as I
Speaker 2: pointed out last week. He'll criticize people. He criticizes everybody,
Speaker 2: even people he likes, even people he hires. Again, but
Speaker 2: they gave him a standing ovation. You don't get brought
Speaker 2: in as a keynote speaker, and you don't get a
Speaker 2: standing ovation unless they know what this guy is about.
Speaker 2: And it was five years ago that he kicked off
Speaker 2: this COVID nonsense and created the bio weapon right after
Speaker 2: he went to Davos. You know, we've had Bilderberg for
Speaker 2: the longest time. Kissinger ruled there. Everybody understood what that
Speaker 2: guy was about. But when you see the same thing
Speaker 2: being done by Trump and by his allies, we pretend
Speaker 2: that that's not what's happening, truly is amazing. You know,
Speaker 2: you had Kissinger whales there, He had his lieutenants, Patchennik,
Speaker 2: who was a major contributor at info Wars. He was
Speaker 2: the guy who was heavily involved in Operation gladiol Is,
Speaker 2: a false flag NATO attack. Nevertheless, let's move on here.
Speaker 2: The declaration rests on clearly unconstitutional grounds. Under the Constitution,
Speaker 2: international treaties require the consent of two thirds of the Senate.
Speaker 2: But Trump is just going to ratify this himself, you know,
Speaker 2: in the same way that Obama and John Kerry claimed
Speaker 2: that they ratified the twenty fifteen Paris Climate A cord
Speaker 2: would just self ratify it, right, So now Trump is
Speaker 2: doing the same thing. That's one of the reasons why
Speaker 2: he didn't pull out of it, folks, because he wanted
Speaker 2: that ability to just unilaterally get into a treaty. That's
Speaker 2: why they never call out the other guy. That's why
Speaker 2: this what aboutism is a bunch of nonsense. Whenever he
Speaker 2: criticize somebody who's Republican, or he criticized Trump for viling
Speaker 2: the law, the Republicans will say, yeah, but what about
Speaker 2: the Democrats did that? Well, it's like, yeah, the Republicans
Speaker 2: will cement that in when the Democrats do it, And
Speaker 2: the Democrats did the same thing for the Republicans. So
Speaker 2: there has been no vote about this. Moreover, says in America,
Speaker 2: the Charter designates Trump as chairman of the new international body,
Speaker 2: a role not among the powers enumerated to the presidency
Speaker 2: under the Constitution. The Charter itself falls into an ambiguous story.
Speaker 2: Its full text was not released by the White House
Speaker 2: or the State Department. Instead, it was published by the
Speaker 2: Times of Israel. Isn't That Interesting, which said it obtained
Speaker 2: and verified the document after it was circulated privately to
Speaker 2: invited leaders. The White House announcement left little doubt about
Speaker 2: its intent. It explicitly tied the Board of Peace to
Speaker 2: President Trump's vision of transforming Gaza. However, the interesting thing
Speaker 2: about this is that the text never references Gaza. Isn't
Speaker 2: that interesting? Like everything else that Trump does, Yeah, this
Speaker 2: is about Gaza, except it doesn't say anything at all
Speaker 2: about Gaza. It is a broad document that involves a
Speaker 2: lot of things, and of course it can be used
Speaker 2: for Gaza without mentioning Gaza. It can be used for
Speaker 2: a lot of other things without mentioning those other things either.
Speaker 2: And so I guess, you know, the first there was
Speaker 2: rumors that UHT Yahoo didn't like it. Then Yahoo kind
Speaker 2: of signed on to it. I guess now we could
Speaker 2: say we could put up a sign, so we got
Speaker 2: b Bey on board instead of the Baby on board.
Speaker 2: Things that he's on board with it because it doesn't
Speaker 2: really say anything about Gaza or what's going to happen there.
Speaker 2: It notably makes no mention of Gaza, says The Times
Speaker 2: of Israel. The US wants the Board a piece to
Speaker 2: assist in the resolution of other conflicts around the globe
Speaker 2: as well. The omission is particularly striking since the mandate
Speaker 2: of the Board, approved in November by the Security Council
Speaker 2: is limited to Gaza and only until the end of
Speaker 2: twenty twenty seven. While the sixth point of Trump's original
Speaker 2: plan focuses on Hamas, the reported charter has no mention
Speaker 2: of Hamas either. It does not address disarmament in Gaza,
Speaker 2: it makes no mention of war crime allegations facing either
Speaker 2: Hamas or Israel, and it doesn't limit the board's scope
Speaker 2: geographically or politically. In other words, this is a new
Speaker 2: international organization, but Trump is not a globalist. Just keep
Speaker 2: repeating that self to you. Keep repeating that to yourself instead.
Speaker 2: The preamble frames the Board as an alternative to existing institutions.
Speaker 2: It speaks of the need for the courage to depart
Speaker 2: from approaches and institutions that have too often failed. It
Speaker 2: also calls for a more nimble, effective international peace building body.
Speaker 2: The contradiction is now impossible to ignore. Public messaging casts
Speaker 2: this board as a Gaza focus, but the legal text,
Speaker 2: if authentic, leaves the door open to a global mandate.
Speaker 2: So as we see all the time, Trump says it's
Speaker 2: about one thing, when it's actually about something completely different.
Speaker 2: You know, with the agreement that they had down in Panama,
Speaker 2: a friend of mine has his family has been involved.
Speaker 2: He's American, but his family has been involved with businesses
Speaker 2: down in Panama, and he said it created quite a stir.
Speaker 2: Of course, it was never reported here in America, created
Speaker 2: quite a stir that they came up with an agreement,
Speaker 2: and the Trump administration in the White House said the
Speaker 2: agreement was one thing, whereas if you look at the
Speaker 2: actual Spanish text versus the English text, they said completely
Speaker 2: different things. And then after the Panamanian papers pointed that out,
Speaker 2: you've got a Spanish version of this agreement and you've
Speaker 2: got an English version of this agreement at the White House,
Speaker 2: and they conflict with each other. They say completely different things.
Speaker 2: After that was made public by the Panamanian paper, guess what,
Speaker 2: the US document disappeared. We're not dealing with honess people here, folks.
Speaker 2: They are criminals. So let's talk about the mission. The
Speaker 2: charter opens to the broad mission statement. The Board of
Speaker 2: Peace is an international organization that seeks to promote stability,
Speaker 2: restore dependable lawful governance, and secure and during peace and
Speaker 2: areas that are threatened by conflict. Does that sound like Trump?
Speaker 2: Does this sound like anybody but Trump? You know, it
Speaker 2: could be doing that, but certainly that is in conflict
Speaker 2: to everything that Trump has been doing. You're saying that
Speaker 2: it is there to promote stability, to restore dependable lawful governance.
Speaker 2: Is Trump about any of that stuff? To ensure peace
Speaker 2: and areas that are threatened by conflict? No, he threatens
Speaker 2: conflicts in areas that are peaceful Greenland, Canada, so forth.
Speaker 2: It adds to the Board will undertake quote peace building
Speaker 2: functions in accordance with international law. He doesn't care anything
Speaker 2: about international law. You know, they violate the Geneva Convention
Speaker 2: in Venezuela and everything else. So again, we're going to
Speaker 2: kill suspects on site, and then we'll circle back and
Speaker 2: murder those that are shipwrecked. The claim to secure and
Speaker 2: during peace sits uneasily alongside heavy handed foreign policy of
Speaker 2: the Trump administration, says a New American absolutely right. And
Speaker 2: then you take a look at how it is structured.
Speaker 2: And this is why I say it's important to take
Speaker 2: a look at this. We're going to run over or
Speaker 2: have run over time, but we're going to go as
Speaker 2: long as it takes for me to finish this, and
Speaker 2: it won't be that long. But this needs to be
Speaker 2: focused on because look at how this thing is structured,
Speaker 2: and you can see Trump's vision of government. He doesn't
Speaker 2: care a whit about the Constitution, he doesn't care a
Speaker 2: whit about legal structures here or internationally. Instead, this is
Speaker 2: how he wants to run things. His Board of Peace
Speaker 2: is a reflection of the guy who created this whole
Speaker 2: thing and how he views governance. So you have the chairman.
Speaker 2: The charter finds the Board of Piece as a fully
Speaker 2: fledged international organization with international legal personality. It can enter contracts,
Speaker 2: it can acquire and dispose of property, it can open
Speaker 2: bank accounts, receive public and private funds, and it can
Speaker 2: employ staff. It's got basically everything except an army here.
Speaker 2: But Trump is a globalist and he wants to be
Speaker 2: a global king, a caesar. At the center of this
Speaker 2: structure sits a single office. Article three says Donald J.
Speaker 2: Trump shall serve as inaugural Chairman of the Board of Peace,
Speaker 2: and he shall separately serve as inaugural Representative of the US.
Speaker 2: And so again you've got a dictator at the very
Speaker 2: center of this has only got a single office, and
Speaker 2: that is the Chairman. Everything revolves around the Chairman. He
Speaker 2: holds financially, he holds final approval authority over all major decisions,
Speaker 2: including budgets, international agreements, the creation of subsidiary entities, and
Speaker 2: the initiation of peace building missions. Everything is done by
Speaker 2: the dictator that he calls a chairman. While member states
Speaker 2: may vote on proposals, all decisions require the Chairman's approval
Speaker 2: to take effect. In the event of a tie, the
Speaker 2: Chairman casts the deciding votes. In disputes over the meaning
Speaker 2: or application of the Charter, the Chairman is explicitly designated
Speaker 2: as the final authority you should call himself Chairman MAO.
Speaker 2: Removal of the Chairman is tightly constrained, only following either
Speaker 2: a voluntary resignation or incapacity. Yeah, sounds like his approach
Speaker 2: to him. I'm going to run a third term until
Speaker 2: I'm dead. I'm going to stay president, right, only if
Speaker 2: the Executive Board votes unanimously, can he be removed, And
Speaker 2: if in such a case, the Chairman's predesignated successor, he
Speaker 2: will choose a successor just like a king, just like
Speaker 2: a caesar, would immediately assume all duties and authorities of
Speaker 2: the role. The charter also grants the chairman exclusive authority
Speaker 2: to create, modify, or dissolve subsidiary bodies. In addition, the
Speaker 2: Chairman is empowered to invite regional economic integration organizations to
Speaker 2: participate in the Board's proceedings. We have seen all of
Speaker 2: this in the way that Trump governs in America. This
Speaker 2: is a reflection, a codification of his view of government.
Speaker 2: If Trump were a founding father instead of a father
Speaker 2: of the bioweapon, this is what he would produce. This
Speaker 2: is his founding document for his global technocracy. So how
Speaker 2: do you get into this and how do you stay
Speaker 2: in it?
Speaker 3: Well.
Speaker 2: Membership rules reinforce the Board's transactional design. Article two restricts
Speaker 2: membership to states invited by the Chairman. Each member state
Speaker 2: must be represented by its head of state or a government.
Speaker 2: Membership terms are limited to three years may be renewed
Speaker 2: only at the Chairman's discretion. The Charter then introduces a
Speaker 2: key exception, the three year membership term shall not apply
Speaker 2: to member states that give this Board of Peace a
Speaker 2: billion dollars in cash, and so how is it going
Speaker 2: to be spent? Where's it going to be will be
Speaker 2: at the discretion, of course of the chairman. The charter
Speaker 2: does not specify how those funds are allocated, administered, or audited.
Speaker 2: Isn't that convenient? The chairman may terminate a state's membership
Speaker 2: subject to a potential veto by two thirds the remaining members.
Speaker 2: And this is a very good comment here from the
Speaker 2: New American. The resulting structure more closely remembers resembles a
Speaker 2: private club, you know, like mar Lago, than it does
Speaker 2: a multilateral institution. It has membership, fees, duration, and expulsion,
Speaker 2: all managed from the top by the chairman, the dictator,
Speaker 2: if you will. And then it has an executive board.
Speaker 2: That's the only thing other than a chairman that it's
Speaker 2: gone here. So the charter cates a second tier of
Speaker 2: governance beneath the Board of Member States. It's called the
Speaker 2: Executive Board. And this looks very much like Trump's cabinet.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, if you look at the
Speaker 2: original seven members that he has proposed here. Four of
Speaker 2: them are either cabinet members or closely tied to Trump
Speaker 2: as sick offense and subordinates for quite some time, you know,
Speaker 2: like Kushner, Jared Kushner. But you also got Marco Rubio
Speaker 2: is the number one there. So you have people in whitcoff.
Speaker 2: So you have people who are friends, people who are
Speaker 2: on hit part of his cabinet or have been in
Speaker 2: the past. Four out of the seven. The other three
Speaker 2: are people like Tony Blair and the President of the
Speaker 2: World Bank. The other three are councilor and foreign relation
Speaker 2: to people right died in the world certified globalist. If
Speaker 2: you've got Tony Blair as one of your key members,
Speaker 2: how in the world could anybody see anything other than
Speaker 2: globalism behind that. He's been one of the worst people
Speaker 2: in terms of pushing the new world order in globalism,
Speaker 2: so of course he's one of the seven that are there.
Speaker 2: So you got three cfr globalists like the President of
Speaker 2: the World Bank, things like that, and Tony Blair, and
Speaker 2: then you've got four people who have been close associates
Speaker 2: and sycophants and employees of Donald Trump. It was very
Speaker 2: much like a cabinet the executive board is responsible.
Speaker 4: Sorry, it's trite, and I don't like George Carlin, but
Speaker 4: the quote fits here more than ever. It's a big
Speaker 4: club than you ain't in it.
Speaker 3: That's right, that's exactly what is.
Speaker 4: It's never been more obvious.
Speaker 3: That's good.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it startled me when you jumped in there, because
Speaker 2: it's kind of loud. The executive board is responsible for
Speaker 2: operational oversight, implementation, and day to day operation. And again
Speaker 2: when you look at the people who are in it,
Speaker 2: Marco Rubio, Steve Whitcoff, Jared Kushner, Witcoff and Kushner his
Speaker 2: guys who are going around setting up real estate partnerships
Speaker 2: for him everywhere as part of this corrupt thing. And
Speaker 2: Robert Gabriel, who is somebody who is a former Trump speechwriter,
Speaker 2: somebody who's on Stephen Miller's staff. He's been involved in
Speaker 2: policy stuff and communications. So there's this four American cabinet members,
Speaker 2: if you will. And then the other three are Tony Blair,
Speaker 2: former Prime Minister of the UK, Mark Rowan CEO of
Speaker 2: Apollo Global Management. He's got a net worth of between
Speaker 2: eight and ten billion dollars. And Aja Banga, the president
Speaker 2: of the World Bank, and all three of those guys
Speaker 2: are CFR members. So the executive Board shall be selected
Speaker 2: by the Chairman and will consist of leaders of global stature.
Speaker 2: They will serve two year terms, very much like the
Speaker 2: cabinet members of Donald Trump. You look at his first term,
Speaker 2: most of these people are two years and out, you know,
Speaker 2: just as long as they can stand him. First, he
Speaker 2: praises them up and down, is the greatest thing ever.
Speaker 2: And then he turns on them after a couple of
Speaker 2: years and chases them down the street hurling insults on him.
Speaker 2: So again, looks very much like the cabinet members in
Speaker 2: his first term. So Reuter's reported on Thursday that Trump
Speaker 2: invited about fifty countries to join the Board of Peace.
Speaker 2: How's he doing on that, Well, it looks like all
Speaker 2: the major countries are saying no. France, Scandinavia, other Western
Speaker 2: European governments are very vocal in terms of declining invitations.
Speaker 2: They are citing concern about the Board's mandate, structure and
Speaker 2: the potential to be an institution that's going to undercut
Speaker 2: what they say established international institutions. Yeah, in the same
Speaker 2: way that people are saying, you know, Trump is trying
Speaker 2: to undercut the Federal Reserve. We don't want him to
Speaker 2: do that. You and I look at the Federal Reserve
Speaker 2: and we see nothing but evil. Trump sees an opportunity
Speaker 2: to wield power. He doesn't want to destroy or reform
Speaker 2: the Federal Reserve. He wants to be the Federal Reserve.
Speaker 2: Same thing about the UN. That's what these people are
Speaker 2: talking about. He doesn't want to destroy the UN. He
Speaker 2: doesn't want to defund the UN. He wants to be
Speaker 2: the UN. And so he creates his private club, the
Speaker 2: Board of Peace. So who is interested in taking this?
Speaker 2: At the White House says they've got about thirty countries
Speaker 2: that are looking to join. So what kind of countries
Speaker 2: are joining? Well, countries like Israel and Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain, Jordan,
Speaker 2: cutter Egypt, Turkey, Hungary, Monaco. These are client states that
Speaker 2: are seeking money and seeking Trump's favor that are interested
Speaker 2: in this. And then you got the real heavy hitters
Speaker 2: like Morocco, Pakistan, Indonesia, Kossovo, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Paraguay, Vietnam, Armenia, Azerbaijan,
Speaker 2: and Belarus. They're not sending him his the best countries,
Speaker 2: I guess you could say from Trump's perspective. So the UK, Germany, Italy,
Speaker 2: twenty seven country sitting on the European Commission have not
Speaker 2: yet committed. Several of them, though, like the French and
Speaker 2: Scandinavian countries, have told him to get lost, especially because
Speaker 2: of this greenland stuff. Russia said it might be willing
Speaker 2: to participate provided that Trump would allow them to get
Speaker 2: their funds unfrozen. They could give him a billion dollars
Speaker 2: to become permanent members. So you unleash those hundreds of
Speaker 2: billions of dollars that Biden sees freezed and seized. Right
Speaker 2: is the phrase that they want to do to us
Speaker 2: through these stable coins. You release some of that stuff
Speaker 2: and they'll give him a kickback for his board. How
Speaker 2: about that? And so we've already got a taste of
Speaker 2: the tantrums. Trump reportedly withdrew his invitation to Canada because
Speaker 2: he got angry with Mark Carney at Davos. So one
Speaker 2: hundred percent terraces and you can't join my club?
Speaker 3: How about that?
Speaker 2: And so the way it's presented by technocracy dot com
Speaker 2: is it is Patrick Wood, says Technocrat in chief, the
Speaker 2: monarch of America the chairman of the Board of Peace.
Speaker 2: The dark Enlightenment tech bros in Washington, DC, who successfully
Speaker 2: baited Trump to be the monarch of America are now cheering,
Speaker 2: says Patrickwood at technocracy dot com. Now the UN has
Speaker 2: outlived its usefulness. Trump has thrown them all under the
Speaker 2: bus by creating the Board of Peace, which will do
Speaker 2: whatever it wants, quote unquote, that's what Trump said about it.
Speaker 2: The charter of the Board of Peace was leaked to
Speaker 2: the Times of Israel even as the document was being
Speaker 2: handed out to attendees the World Economic Forum in Davos,
Speaker 2: and it is again a disgusting view of Trump's view
Speaker 2: of governance. It's basically a private club that he runs
Speaker 2: that he collects money for. Jared Kushner laid out the
Speaker 2: plan for Gaza. He talked about it as being a
Speaker 2: technocratic a political committee, and again you see the White
Speaker 2: House as a communications he keeps using the term technocratic.
Speaker 2: So they said the National Committee for the Administration of
Speaker 2: Gaza will be headed by former Palestinian Authority Deputy Planning Minister,
Speaker 2: who the White House and its Friday announcement called a
Speaker 2: widely respected technocratic leader. And then continue to say. He's
Speaker 2: widely respected for his pragmatic, technocratic leadership and his understanding
Speaker 2: of Gaza's realities.
Speaker 4: There.
Speaker 2: You know, it's interesting. First time I ever noticed thing
Speaker 2: by being called a technocrat was when they put in
Speaker 2: the bankster Mario Draghi. He had Greece back in twenty
Speaker 2: eleven had a lot of major deficits that looked like
Speaker 2: they were going to go bankrupt as a country, looked
Speaker 2: like they might exit the euro because of that. So
Speaker 2: European Central Bank put pressure on them and they put
Speaker 2: in Mario Draghi as the leader essentially of Greece. That's
Speaker 2: the first time I ever noticed Nigel fraud. She got
Speaker 2: up at the European Parliament. He said, how dare you
Speaker 2: and the country that gave us the concept of democracy
Speaker 2: overturn their election and put in a technocrat Mario Drogy,
Speaker 2: a banker who's going to run the country. That's the
Speaker 2: way these guys operate, and that is now becoming kind
Speaker 2: of standard practice as we look at this, and that
Speaker 2: is the way this document is set up. And so
Speaker 2: they're going to turn Gaza into a high tech smart
Speaker 2: city complex built on the core principles and governance ideas
Speaker 2: of the smart cities and the twenty thirty agenda from
Speaker 2: the World Economic Forum, and the un new New World
Speaker 2: Order will be run by the rulers of the old
Speaker 2: New Order, like members of the Trilateral Commission. It is
Speaker 2: technocracy and full bloom. And I got to say, you know,
Speaker 2: even as we saw this, got this group mostly conservatives,
Speaker 2: mostly the Republicans. We're talking about this Convention of the States,
Speaker 2: and they just got another state to sign onto it
Speaker 2: to call for the convention. Now, anything that comes out
Speaker 2: of that convention once they get and they're starting to
Speaker 2: get pretty close to the number of states that they
Speaker 2: need to have a constitutional convention, who knows what that's
Speaker 2: going to be like. And supposedly coming out of that
Speaker 2: any amendments to the Constitution would still have to be ratified. Nevertheless,
Speaker 2: when we look at this whole idea, do you really
Speaker 2: want these types of people to formally rewrite our government?
Speaker 2: At least where we are right now, you can call
Speaker 2: them out as liars, thieves, and oath breakers because they
Speaker 2: have to take an oath to the Constitution to get
Speaker 2: their office. And so at least we have that that's
Speaker 2: the only thing that really remains of the Constitution. If
Speaker 2: these guys get their way, if they have a Convention
Speaker 2: of States, it's going to be people like Donald Trump
Speaker 2: as one of the people going to write the new documents.
Speaker 2: You can see in this so called Board of Peace
Speaker 2: that he wants to establish a dictatorship with himself or
Speaker 2: somebody like him calling all the shots. That's exactly the
Speaker 2: impulse that we see in everything that's being done, not
Speaker 2: just by Trump, but by the Republican Party in general,
Speaker 2: and certainly by the Democrats as well. It's a real
Speaker 2: warning to take a look at what he wants to
Speaker 2: do with this. Well, we're going to cut it at
Speaker 2: this point. We've gone over about eighteen minutes, but I
Speaker 2: did want to cover that today, and so we're going
Speaker 2: to end the program here. Thank you very much for
Speaker 2: joining us, and Travis, you can play us out here.
Speaker 1: The common man.
Speaker 2: They created common Core and dumbed down our children. They
Speaker 2: created common past track.
Speaker 1: And control us.
Speaker 2: They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
Speaker 2: and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,
Speaker 2: unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity
Speaker 2: created in the image of God.
Speaker 3: That is what we have in common That is what
Speaker 3: they want to take away.
Speaker 2: Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
Speaker 2: to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.
Speaker 2: It's time to turn that around and expose what they
Speaker 2: want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll
Speaker 2: find at the Davidnightshow dot com.
Speaker 3: Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you
Speaker 3: can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
Speaker 3: D Davidnightshow dot com