Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act.
Speaker 2: It's the David Knight Show. As a clock strikes thirteen,
Speaker 2: it's Tuesday, the twenty sixth of August. You have our lord,
Speaker 2: twenty twenty five. Well, Donald Trump is doing his best
Speaker 2: to remake our country and his image, unfortunately, and so
Speaker 2: today we're going to begin with some of the novel
Speaker 2: and unusual things that he's decided to do. And actually
Speaker 2: some of this may cause people to think and examine
Speaker 2: and discover. For example, the war that he has now
Speaker 2: with this Federal Reserve board of governors trying to move
Speaker 2: Cook one of the governors. He's actually right, she did
Speaker 2: break the law, but she hasn't been charged. And the
Speaker 2: question is who's got jurisdiction here? And she is asserting
Speaker 2: that she's independent of all this because the Federal Reserve,
Speaker 2: she says, it's private. Isn't that interesting? Who knew? So
Speaker 2: discovery may be interesting, and it also brings up questions
Speaker 2: about an executive order that Donald Trump wants to have
Speaker 2: one year in prison for people who burn the American flag?
Speaker 2: What should we do with politicians who burned the American constitution?
Speaker 2: Stay with us we'll be right back. Well, Donald Trump
Speaker 2: yesterday signed an executive order. Actually I think it was Monday, Yeah,
Speaker 2: Monday that he signed the executive orse. Today is was
Speaker 2: yesterday losing Tiger? Which day of the week it is
Speaker 2: already and only two days into it. I only got
Speaker 2: to choose from anyway, he signed the executive order, and
Speaker 2: listen to what he had to say about that.
Speaker 3: Lastly, sir, this is an executive order on flag burning.
Speaker 3: It charges your attorney general. Would you listen to this?
Speaker 3: This is a very flag burning all over the country.
Speaker 3: They're burning flags all over the world.
Speaker 4: They burned the American flag, and as you know, through
Speaker 4: a very said court. I guess it was a five
Speaker 4: to four decision. They called it freedom of speech. But
Speaker 4: there's another reason, which is perhaps much more important. It's
Speaker 4: called death. Because what happens when you burn a flag
Speaker 4: is the area goes crazy. If you have hundreds of people,
Speaker 4: they go crazy. You could do other things, you can
Speaker 4: burn this piece of.
Speaker 2: You mean, like January six, But.
Speaker 4: When you burn the American flag, it incites riots at
Speaker 4: levels that we've never seen before. People go crazy in.
Speaker 5: A way both ways.
Speaker 2: Trumpe ne riot.
Speaker 4: Crazy for doing it. There are others that are angry,
Speaker 4: angry about them doing it? Do you want to discuss that?
Speaker 6: Sure?
Speaker 3: What the executive order does or charges your Department of
Speaker 3: Justice with investigating instances of flag burning and then where
Speaker 3: there's evidence of criminal activity, that where prosecution wouldn't fall
Speaker 3: afoul of the First Amendment and instructs the Department of Justice.
Speaker 7: To process or engaged in the right as a flagburn.
Speaker 4: And what the penalty is going to be. If you
Speaker 4: burn a flag, you get one year in jail, No
Speaker 4: early exits, no nothing. You get one year in jail.
Speaker 4: If you burn a flag, you get and what it
Speaker 4: does is in sight to write out they use that language,
Speaker 4: by the way, did the insight to riot? And you
Speaker 4: burn a flag? You get one year in jail. You
Speaker 4: don't get ten years, you don't get one month. You
Speaker 4: get one year in jail. And it goes on your
Speaker 4: record and you will see flag burning stopping immediately, just
Speaker 4: like when I signed the Statute and Monument Act. Ten
Speaker 4: years in jail, have you heard any about beautiful monuments?
Speaker 4: Everybody left town, they were gone. Never had a problem
Speaker 4: after that. It's pretty amazing we stopped it. But this
Speaker 4: is something that's I don't know. In a certain way,
Speaker 4: it's equally as important. Some people would say it's more
Speaker 4: important because the people in this country don't want to
Speaker 4: see our American flag burned and spit on, and by
Speaker 4: people that are.
Speaker 2: You have burned and spot on the First Amendment.
Speaker 4: They're paid by the radical left to do it. You
Speaker 4: talk to these people, they don't even know. Half of
Speaker 4: them don't even know what they're doing this. I don't
Speaker 4: know they gave me money to do this. I see
Speaker 4: the same things did they banded people that are trying
Speaker 4: to destroy a nation that's not working because I think
Speaker 4: our nation now is the most respected nation anywhere in
Speaker 4: the world by far. You saw that with the European
Speaker 4: leaders on Friday. You saw that with NATO where they
Speaker 4: agreed to go from two percent no pay to five
Speaker 4: percent fully paid up, trillions of dollars paid, where they
Speaker 4: respect your president to a level that they jokingly called
Speaker 4: me the president of Europe. They called me the president
Speaker 4: of Europe, which is an honor. I like Europe, and
Speaker 4: I like those people. They're good people to great leaders.
Speaker 4: And we've never had a case where seven plus really
Speaker 4: twenty eight essentially thirty five thirty eight countries were represented here.
Speaker 4: The other day, thirty eight European countries were European and
Speaker 4: other countries were represented, and it was a great meeting.
Speaker 4: But your country is respected again. I say it all
Speaker 4: the time. One year ago, our country was dead. Everybody
Speaker 4: said it. We had a dead we were not going
Speaker 4: to survive. Now we have the hottest country anywhere in
Speaker 4: the world. So it's an honor to be involved in
Speaker 4: this group. Has a lot to do with it.
Speaker 2: Right behind me, it's hot. It's like the babes at
Speaker 2: my beauty contests. It's one hot country. Yeah. Well, you
Speaker 2: could hear that. This is something that he's very passionate about.
Speaker 2: And you know, it's kind of interesting to me, Travis,
Speaker 2: that so many people will get so passionate about flags.
Speaker 2: Think about it. You know, the Pride flags and the
Speaker 2: Palestinian flags, Israeli flags, American flags. It is something that
Speaker 2: people are really really passionate about. I'm passionate about principles
Speaker 2: by the Bill of Rights in the First Amendment. That's
Speaker 2: what I hate to see destroyed, burned, trashed. And as
Speaker 2: Trump was saying, you know, they pay the radical left
Speaker 2: is paid by these people who do this kind of stuff.
Speaker 2: Who's paying you, Trump to shut down First Amendment rights
Speaker 2: of protests and protect a foreign country like Israel. They're
Speaker 2: the ones coming after our First Amendment and you've been
Speaker 2: their puppet and you've spat on the Constitution one way
Speaker 2: after the other. What should we do with people like him?
Speaker 2: It's amazing to me.
Speaker 8: Yeah, just the fact that he says the riots are
Speaker 8: triggered by the flagbirning and not as an outshoot of
Speaker 8: a riot that's already ongoing is ridiculous.
Speaker 2: Well, if you listen to his nonsense, it's very similar
Speaker 2: to the nonsense that was spouted out by Joe Biden
Speaker 2: in the left about January sixth. Oh, this is a riot.
Speaker 2: It was an insurrection, and it was started by Trump
Speaker 2: and so forth. And if you could blame anybody for
Speaker 2: starting it, be Trump, Alex Jones, whatever. But nevertheless, it
Speaker 2: was not a riot. It was not an insurrection. I mean,
Speaker 2: you had some people who went overboard and they could
Speaker 2: have been punished, but that was not what Biden and
Speaker 2: the Democrats did. They went after people who were just
Speaker 2: there because they did geo fencing, and they found the
Speaker 2: people who were there and they prosecuted them, and even
Speaker 2: as I point out a situation where two elderly men
Speaker 2: and one of them's son that they need to go
Speaker 2: to the restroom, and the doors are opened there in
Speaker 2: the Capitol building, and they walked over to the police
Speaker 2: officers and asked them who a restroom is? They said,
Speaker 2: right inside, going here. They went in there, they used
Speaker 2: the restroom. They came out and there was a female
Speaker 2: cop and she tried to direct them onto the house floor.
Speaker 2: I said, no, no, no, we don't want to go further,
Speaker 2: and we just wanted to use the restroom.
Speaker 8: They left.
Speaker 2: They were indicted by Biden. And it's just kind of
Speaker 2: over the top nonsense that both Trump and Biden are
Speaker 2: mirror images of each other. They're just different clubs, but
Speaker 2: they think the same way. That's why they're both selected
Speaker 2: to be there. It's professional wrestling. So one year in jail,
Speaker 2: he said, no early exists, no nothing, and it goes
Speaker 2: on your record. Oh no, my permanent record.
Speaker 8: You're never going to escape this.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. By the way, you know, don't criticize
Speaker 2: nt Yahoo either, you know, don't burn Yahoo or an
Speaker 2: American flag, you know, don't burn in their comments, don't
Speaker 2: burn him a effigy for sure, or you're going to
Speaker 2: get the same kind of treatment. They don't care about
Speaker 2: the fact that Harvard was getting nine billion with a
Speaker 2: B dollars worth of taxpayer money from Washington d C.
Speaker 2: The only care that Harvard was allowing people to protest
Speaker 2: a foreign country that was paying the politicians like crump here.
Speaker 2: So the executive Order instructs the Attorney General to prosecute
Speaker 2: those who burned us a great the American flag. So
Speaker 2: here's a new federal crime. As I say the other
Speaker 2: day when we were talked yesterday, when we were talking
Speaker 2: about the federalization of the police, as a reason, pointed
Speaker 2: out there were only three crimes in the constitution, which
Speaker 2: kind of says that they did not envision that the
Speaker 2: federal government would have police. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: nobody had police at the local level. You had a
Speaker 2: sheriff and you had the community that was armed, and
Speaker 2: that was how order was kept. But now they're inventing
Speaker 2: crimes to go after people. And this is just more
Speaker 2: of Trump's vendetta. He says, this main clube is not
Speaker 2: limited to this is what the order says, violent crimes,
Speaker 2: hate crimes, illegal discrimination against American citizens, or other violations
Speaker 2: of American civil rights. Well, those are all crimes in
Speaker 2: and of themselves. Whenever you see this kind of hate
Speaker 2: speech nonsense. They tried to tie it in to things
Speaker 2: that were already crimes. Violent crime has already been a crime.
Speaker 2: And again it goes back to what Biden did. If
Speaker 2: somebody physically assaults or breaks and enters or destroys property
Speaker 2: or whatever in January sixth, some did that was already
Speaker 2: a crime. You don't need to then extend that to
Speaker 2: everybody who was present, which is what they did. So
Speaker 2: both the Republicans and the Democrats have the ridiculous hate
Speaker 2: speech rules that are in direct conflict with the First Amendment.
Speaker 8: That's a militarizing the police force does nothing if you
Speaker 8: aren't actually going to enforce the laws. It's just a
Speaker 8: tool of oppression. At that point, we have laws on
Speaker 8: the books for basically all of these things already, they
Speaker 8: just absolutely refuse to enforce them.
Speaker 2: That's right, that's right. When people talk about having a
Speaker 2: constitutional convention, it's like, well, the problem is the politicians
Speaker 2: and the very politicians.
Speaker 8: Want to give Nancy Pelosi the chance to.
Speaker 2: Write a new constitution. Yeah, that's right. Does have a
Speaker 2: new constitution written by people like Nancy Pelosi and Donald
Speaker 2: Trump and Mike Johnson who have absolutely no respect for
Speaker 2: the Constitution. They sort of uphold as a condition of
Speaker 2: their authority, and so these people ignore it. And you
Speaker 2: don't want those kinds of people who have no character
Speaker 2: to write some new controlling document that's going to be
Speaker 2: the foundation. So to the Supreme Court, this is struck
Speaker 2: down three decades ago, nineteen eighty nine. There's a Supreme
Speaker 2: Court case. As he said, it was five to four,
Speaker 2: and so some of the conservatives are saying, oh, wait
Speaker 2: a minute, you know that means but you know, it
Speaker 2: was all of the conservatives on one side and all
Speaker 2: the liberals on the other side, and the tiebreaker was Scalia,
Speaker 2: who stood with the First Amendment. And so they said,
Speaker 2: it's not a clear cut decision at all. I remember
Speaker 2: a time when about the only thing that the left
Speaker 2: got right was the free speech issue, and that was
Speaker 2: one of the few things that they got right. And
Speaker 2: they did get that right, but it was because they
Speaker 2: were protesting the war and things like that, and they
Speaker 2: wultn't to be able to do that. They have now
Speaker 2: completely abandoned that, and many conservatives have as well as
Speaker 2: we're going to point out here, though some conservatives have
Speaker 2: gotten a little bit of a spine here to take
Speaker 2: on Trump and actually talk about the fact that this
Speaker 2: is in conflict with not only the Supreme Court, but
Speaker 2: actually the Constitution itself. So in a few times, the
Speaker 2: Supreme Court got something right, and we'll see what happens
Speaker 2: with that. They said. The justices said that the First
Speaker 2: Amendment protects expressive conduct such as burning the American flag.
Speaker 2: Justice Kennedy, in a separate concurrence, acknowledged the rulings on popularity,
Speaker 2: but he wrote, quote, the flag protects those who hold
Speaker 2: it in contempt. And the converse of that is that
Speaker 2: you've got people like Trump who hold the Constitution in
Speaker 2: contempt but worship the flag and talk about desecration and
Speaker 2: how we should honor this thing. It's like a religious
Speaker 2: relic to them, and it is kind of a state religion.
Speaker 2: That's one of the things. I guess it's always kind
Speaker 2: of turned me off of the flag stuff. People get
Speaker 2: so precious about the flag that are their symbols, and
Speaker 2: that of course can be the LGBT people, and you know,
Speaker 2: they paint their their paint, their rainbow colors on a
Speaker 2: crosswalk and then if somebody comes along and protest it
Speaker 2: by doing a burnout on it. Yeah, don't burn the
Speaker 2: flag and don't burn out. Don't burn out the rainbow crosswalk.
Speaker 2: Are you going to get in trouble? But that was
Speaker 2: the protest as well. But these people have their symbols,
Speaker 2: and their symbols are sacred to them. It's a religion
Speaker 2: to them. And I guess that's one of the reasons
Speaker 2: why I could never really get into the Pledge of
Speaker 2: Allegiance and flags and things like that. It was because
Speaker 2: it was too much. I saw the reverence and the
Speaker 2: religiosity that was being attached to it, and it's like,
Speaker 2: I'm not going there anyway. They called it freedom of speech,
Speaker 2: Trump said, But there's another reason, which is perhaps much
Speaker 2: more important. It's called death again. Really, death is the reason. Yeah,
Speaker 2: he would love to give the death penalty to people
Speaker 2: who do things that he doesn't like. That's the kind
Speaker 2: of guy that he is. How about your executive order
Speaker 2: for fake emergencies.
Speaker 7: Death is the reason burning flags is making you unsafe? Yeah,
Speaker 7: this order to burn the flag that doesn't protect you,
Speaker 7: burning the flag that doesn't hurt you, That hurts your neighbor.
Speaker 7: So therefore, yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and we have to all be safe, right, so
Speaker 2: get rid of your liberty because safety comes first. And
Speaker 2: I guess the question is, you know, when we talk
Speaker 2: about death, this is the guy who killed untold millions
Speaker 2: of people in this country and the world with his
Speaker 2: mRNA vaccine that he still touts. How does he get
Speaker 2: off talking about death? Why hypocrisy? So the Chief Council
Speaker 2: of Fire, which is a national free speech group, they
Speaker 2: work a lot at universities because that's where they really
Speaker 2: hate free speech there. And the Trump administration Fire said
Speaker 2: while people can be prosecuted for burning anything in a
Speaker 2: place that they are not allowed to set fires, the
Speaker 2: government cannot prosecute protected expressive activity, even if many Americans,
Speaker 2: including the President, find it quote uniquely offensive and provocative.
Speaker 2: And so this has been a pet peeve of his
Speaker 2: for years, talking about flag burning, and a lot of
Speaker 2: people talked about that as well, who said I would
Speaker 2: never burn a flag because to them, the flag represents
Speaker 2: things like the First Amendment, the Bill of Rights, the Constitution.
Speaker 2: It's not a club or a power trip like it
Speaker 2: represents obviously to a Trump.
Speaker 8: The other thing is just the people that generally engage
Speaker 8: in flag burning are usually the most despicable memories of
Speaker 8: the left wing. So it makes it very easy for
Speaker 8: Trump to come in and do this sort of thing
Speaker 8: because you see the type of people that are engaging
Speaker 8: in and you go, oh, well, these people need to
Speaker 8: be punished.
Speaker 2: And that's what it is. It's virtue signaling to his base.
Speaker 2: Its professional wrestling, but it's also doing exactly the same
Speaker 2: thing that Biden did to the J sixers. He's doing
Speaker 2: it to the other tribe. The Order describes the flag
Speaker 2: as quote the most sacred and cherished symbol of the
Speaker 2: United States. What utter nonsense the constitution you SE's War two,
Speaker 2: you traitor, that's what is the sacred cherished symbol of
Speaker 2: your authority? And you don't have any he called x.
Speaker 2: It calls acts of desecration. See that's why we're talking
Speaker 2: about this. Like I say, religious relic, I reject the
Speaker 2: cult of the omnipotent state. When I saw that in
Speaker 2: the Libertarian Party's statement, you know, with principles, they had
Speaker 2: me right there. It's like, you guys get it. It
Speaker 2: is a cult. It is a cult of the omnipotent state.
Speaker 2: And I'm disgusted with that. I will not pledge allegiance
Speaker 2: to that cult because it's not about the Constitution. I
Speaker 2: pledge allegiance to the Constitution, but not taking these politicians
Speaker 2: or these political parties. Says it is uniquely offensive and provocative,
Speaker 2: a statement of contempt, hostility, and violence against our nation. No,
Speaker 2: it's against your administration. That sounds like nation, doesn't it.
Speaker 2: But yeah, so the politicians who burn their bill rights
Speaker 2: should be impeached at the very least. Trump is an
Speaker 2: international war criminal for what he's done with the mRNA jabs,
Speaker 2: but he'll never be indicted, even let alone punished in
Speaker 2: this life.
Speaker 8: Yes, we want to burn the people that are in prison,
Speaker 8: the people that burn the symbol of the country, but
Speaker 8: not the people that are actually destroying the substance of
Speaker 8: the country.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the principles and killing people. You want to talk
Speaker 2: about death? What hypocrisy. So a lot of conservatives surprisingly
Speaker 2: have pushed back on Trump on this, saying this is
Speaker 2: garbage in media Heighte, which is a left winging publication
Speaker 2: that is always antient. Trump on every issue picked up
Speaker 2: the tweets of some people who pushed back on this.
Speaker 2: I'm not even engaging with any of this stuff on
Speaker 2: Twitter anymore. But Casey Maddox said I anticipate significantly more
Speaker 2: flag burning in the weeks ahead. Jesse Kelly said I
Speaker 2: would never in a million years harm the American flag,
Speaker 2: but a president telling me I can't has me as
Speaker 2: close as I'll ever be to the lighting one on fire.
Speaker 2: I am a free American citizen, and if I ever
Speaker 2: feel like torching one, I will. This is garbage. This
Speaker 2: reminds me the seen from a Wooty Iswen movie where
Speaker 2: he is he's out of his emblement in New York
Speaker 2: and he's driving a car like around La or so.
Speaker 2: I think it's Annie Hall or something, and he gets
Speaker 2: pulled over by a cop and the guy gets gets
Speaker 2: real officious with him, and so you know, he finally
Speaker 2: pulls out his license and he's about to hand it
Speaker 2: to the cop. He just tears it up in the
Speaker 2: CoP's face. Well, since you put it that way and
Speaker 2: he just tears up, That's the way I feel about
Speaker 2: this order right here.
Speaker 7: What were you going to say, Lance, I'm just going
Speaker 7: to say that we have a lot of comments in
Speaker 7: our chat that are much the same as what you
Speaker 7: were just saying. People that are so annoyed with this
Speaker 7: that it's like, I don't burn flags, but if they're
Speaker 7: going to tell me that I can't, in that case,
Speaker 7: it's more patriotic to do it.
Speaker 2: Yes, exactly, it is. And that, along with what he's
Speaker 2: doing with Epstein guarding his pedophile, guarding our pedophiles a gop.
Speaker 8: It also reminds me of that old far Side comic
Speaker 8: where the guy is standing on the corner with his
Speaker 8: wife and he looks eb and he sees a sign
Speaker 8: that says absolutely no chainsaw juggling. Says, well, now I
Speaker 8: really want to.
Speaker 2: Yeah, burning the American flag is legal, said Brad Palombo,
Speaker 2: First Amendment Protected Act. I agree it is offensive, but
Speaker 2: we do not need safe spaces or coddling from the president,
Speaker 2: especially one who claims to stand for free speech. The
Speaker 2: Telegraph's Nick Gardner called the order brilliant, but Eric Ericksson,
Speaker 2: I'm surprised that he pushed back disagreed. He said, this
Speaker 2: is actually not brilliant. Well, I agree with the sentiment.
Speaker 2: He said. It is unfortunately well settled constitutional law that
Speaker 2: burning the flag is a matter of free speech, and
Speaker 2: the executive does not get to create crimes. That's the
Speaker 2: other part of it. Like I said, this is creating
Speaker 2: a new crime that's not in the Constitution. It is
Speaker 2: a clear violation of the First Amendment. I don't think
Speaker 2: that the Supreme Court decisions are the law of the land,
Speaker 2: but this is a situation where they actually got it right. Scalia,
Speaker 2: in writing about this is actually his son. Scalia is
Speaker 2: dead now, but his son put out a quote from
Speaker 2: him about this decision. Scalia said, you should be in
Speaker 2: no doubt that patriotic conservative that I am, I detest
Speaker 2: the burning of the nation's flag, and if I were king,
Speaker 2: I would make it a crime. King Trump, right, this
Speaker 2: is Scalia from the grave, all of these leftists calling
Speaker 2: him King Trump, and that really got to Trump. But
Speaker 2: of course Scalia had him pegg. But as I understand
Speaker 2: the First Amendment, said Schoolliat, he guarantees the right to
Speaker 2: express contempt for the government, the Congress, the Supreme Court,
Speaker 2: even the nation and the nation's flag. And so that
Speaker 2: is ed Wheelan says, to the fullest extent possible. Sounds aggressive,
Speaker 2: but it actually means within the bounds permitted by law.
Speaker 2: He is a legal expert, and so he's saying it
Speaker 2: sounds like he's really beating his chest here like he's
Speaker 2: back at the world at the WWE Wrestling But in
Speaker 2: reality that's actually kind of a legal claim down. So yeah,
Speaker 2: other people Christopher Rufo got it, I think did not
Speaker 2: quite get it right. He says, I'm sympathetic to the
Speaker 2: argument that burning the American flag has protected speech, but
Speaker 2: right now we're putting people in prison for spin their
Speaker 2: tires over the Pride Flag. So it might be a
Speaker 2: good idea to have the debate about which symbols are
Speaker 2: sacred to the America, to America today, Chris, you got
Speaker 2: it one hundred percent wrong. There's no symbols that are sacred.
Speaker 2: If the substance of the Constitution and the Bill of
Speaker 2: Rights is not respected, you don't even have a rule
Speaker 2: of law. Instead of saying, well, because they're putting people
Speaker 2: in jail for the Pride Flag desecration, we should put
Speaker 2: people in jail for desecrating our symbol. That's what he's saying.
Speaker 2: What absolute tribalism, That's that's what's wrong with conservatism today.
Speaker 2: Christopher Rufo, you just showed us exactly what the problem is. Oh, well,
Speaker 2: the left is doing X, which is wrong. So we're
Speaker 2: going to do X as well. And of course that's
Speaker 2: the same thing that the Democrats do with everything that
Speaker 2: Trump does, as soon as he does the gun control
Speaker 2: by executive or La La Harris the next day or
Speaker 2: so came out said I'm going to do the same
Speaker 2: thing when I become president. And so they're mimicking each other.
Speaker 2: And it's the left right march of tyranny that we
Speaker 2: see over and over again, especially because of all this tribalism.
Speaker 8: It's really funny. You have to be incredibly wrong to
Speaker 8: give Brad Palombo a win on anything. Brad Palombo, I
Speaker 8: don't know who he is. Gay con pseudo conservative commentator
Speaker 8: got caught on Instagram following account that was full of
Speaker 8: nothing but like high school boys sports teams or something,
Speaker 8: and people pointed out and he immediately unfollowed and deactivated
Speaker 8: his account for a while or something like that. So
Speaker 8: he's a weird, creepy guy like Colombo. Oh one more thing,
Speaker 8: one more underaged boy.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Michael Knowles, it's so clear cut. Why was the
Speaker 2: decision five to four the first time around? Even stranger?
Speaker 2: Why was it all the liberals Pluscally on the side
Speaker 2: defending flag burning while the Conservatives, led by Renquist, were
Speaker 2: on the side defending its prohibition. Again more group think,
Speaker 2: this time for Michael Knowles, just like you saw it
Speaker 2: from Christopher Rufo. Yeah, it used to be like I
Speaker 2: said before, that the liberals respected First Amendment for their
Speaker 2: own purposes because they had a lot of things that
Speaker 2: they wanted to protest. But many of these conservatives were
Speaker 2: just fine with things like the drug war, things like
Speaker 2: the TSA, things like searches without warrants, things like civilized
Speaker 2: set forfeiture. So there's a lot of problems with the
Speaker 2: conservatives not respecting the Constitution. And many of the objections
Speaker 2: here are coming from this kind of quasi religious dedication
Speaker 2: to a sacred relic, okay, and the tribalism that it
Speaker 2: represents as well. That's what we're talking about. Don't burn
Speaker 2: my pride flag, you know, don't burn my American flag.
Speaker 2: They hold these symbols as sacred and yet not the
Speaker 2: principles that we see behind it or the authority for
Speaker 2: their office. So it's now desecrating the American flag. He
Speaker 2: wants to make that a crime that will not hold up.
Speaker 2: One person said, there's going to be a lot of
Speaker 2: people who are doing this out of spite, and he
Speaker 2: goes and there's not any of them are going to
Speaker 2: have their convictions upheld if they get them, if they're
Speaker 2: charged by the Trump administration. Let's look at what some
Speaker 2: of the people are saying. First, one is Guard Goldsmith.
Speaker 8: Heke Guard, Good morning, Guard. He says, Hi, everyone just
Speaker 8: burning the flag this morning for heat cheaper than fuel oil.
Speaker 2: Especially if you can get it from China.
Speaker 8: You can get it real cheap from China. It was
Speaker 8: funny years and years ago. I remember walking into a
Speaker 8: Walmart for something and I walked past this, you know,
Speaker 8: the closing section.
Speaker 6: There was this.
Speaker 8: Giant, giant pair of American flag shorts with a big
Speaker 8: old tag that says made in China. It's like this
Speaker 8: five X pair of shorts of the American flag. He's like, well,
Speaker 8: if that doesn't symbolize America today.
Speaker 2: I don't know what the Chinese think about. You make
Speaker 2: it five xs.
Speaker 8: N's of the storm says, burn a Maga hat instead.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 8: That's not illegal yet.
Speaker 2: That's right, that's right, that's you got the right idea.
Speaker 2: That's the word. The protest needs to be focused on Maga.
Speaker 8: And honestly, that might make people more upset these days
Speaker 8: than if you burn the American flag it might be
Speaker 8: a dear symbol to them.
Speaker 2: Well, they certainly care more about their movement and Donald
Speaker 2: Trump than they do about the country or the constitution.
Speaker 8: Or maybe get a Q symbol or something like that. Yeah,
Speaker 8: lou G four liberty. We're all these flag burning triggered ryots.
Speaker 8: Am I missing this activity?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 8: I think we all are. As I said earlier, the
Speaker 8: flag burning doesn't start the riot. The flag burning is
Speaker 8: usually a symptom of a riot in progress. Yeah, it's
Speaker 8: you know, it's the opposite the other way around, Dad
Speaker 8: guy twenty four. Where's all this flag burning? Is there
Speaker 8: some epidemic of flag burning? I'm not seeing. Apparently we've
Speaker 8: all missed it. Brandon Bennett, Bye bye First Amendment.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you know, the thing is, you know we have
Speaker 2: When I was in college, there were so many riots
Speaker 2: and all the rest of this stuff and demonstrations, and
Speaker 2: there was flag burning that was happening everywhere, and then
Speaker 2: they started making clothing out of it, and I thought
Speaker 2: that was actually kind of a protest as well. But
Speaker 2: then you know, now that's be kind of thing, you know,
Speaker 2: like you point.
Speaker 8: Out it's all over the place. Louji for Liberty again
Speaker 8: says this will dovetail with this antisemitic speech law. Soon
Speaker 8: you're not gonna be able to burn an Israeli flag either.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, certainly not in Harvard because they're gonna turn
Speaker 2: they want their nine billion dollars, and so they're going
Speaker 2: to do whatever Israel says, just like Trump will do
Speaker 2: whatever Israel says.
Speaker 8: That's right, geesebusters, Good to see you, geesebusters. Hope you're
Speaker 8: doing well, he says, burn Trump flags, that's right. Brandon Bennett.
Speaker 8: I have a flag in the backseat of my car,
Speaker 8: and I love my country, and for some reason now
Speaker 8: I want to burn it. Absolutely no chainsaw juggling Mama
Speaker 8: Ce nineteen ninety six. Now I know I'll get rid
Speaker 8: of that flag in my basement. Now I know how
Speaker 8: I'll get rid of the flag of my basement. I've
Speaker 8: been storing possum king black Rock is buying up utility companies,
Speaker 8: They're buying up everything. There's nothing black Rock isn't getting into.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they're going to burn down our society and he's
Speaker 2: fine with that.
Speaker 8: Well, you know, they're probably his good buddies over there.
Speaker 2: Oh, they are because he wanted to give them the
Speaker 2: Panama Canal. I haven't heard anything about that for a while,
Speaker 2: have we. You know Panama Canal and Canada is a
Speaker 2: fifty first state in Greenland. I mean, this guy is
Speaker 2: just one traveling you know, conflict wrestling show.
Speaker 8: He didn't go over the canal. Maybe we can take Greenland. No,
Speaker 8: not Greenland, Canada. Maybe Canada. I don't know if they want.
Speaker 2: He learned very well at the at the behest of
Speaker 2: McMahon terms of WWE. They were close friends and he
Speaker 2: knew exactly how to keep the public's attention.
Speaker 8: Lou g for liberty. Too properly disposed of a flag?
Speaker 8: You burn it? Yeah, isn't that right after it's been
Speaker 8: you know, used for a long time and it's old
Speaker 8: and dirty. I think they burn it in the military.
Speaker 8: But yeah, in a sort of ceremony, Yeah, on a
Speaker 8: pyre or something. Bulldag. Flags are a form of idolatry.
Speaker 8: People worship flags. They should work God's words. That's what
Speaker 8: I feel about it.
Speaker 2: I hate this religious air to all this stuff. Right,
Speaker 2: only secular state cult.
Speaker 8: Christ is the only king. He's the only one that's
Speaker 8: worthy of worship.
Speaker 2: But Trump thinks he is king, and Scalia mail. If
Speaker 2: I were king, or if I was somebody like Trump
Speaker 2: who thinks of he's king, I would do this exact
Speaker 2: same thing.
Speaker 8: He knew him a Syrian girl. Of course, Trouble will
Speaker 8: uphold the flag over the Constitution. He marches under the
Speaker 8: flag and sees it as a source of power. The
Speaker 8: Constitution only holds him back. Yeah, it's a source of constraint.
Speaker 2: It's like that picture of where he's hugging the flag
Speaker 2: and kissing it. You know, it's like remember that, that's
Speaker 2: a Yeah.
Speaker 8: They're burning my girlfriend. Why would they do this? Karen
Speaker 8: Carpenter twenty seven ag I wonder if Trump is selling
Speaker 8: a Trump American flag made in China. Of course, Oh,
Speaker 8: I'm sure. I'm sure there must be.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, Well I don't.
Speaker 8: Check his website, so I wouldn't know.
Speaker 2: From burning the First Amendment, which is what he's really
Speaker 2: doing to essentially bringing corporate socialism in a maga hat,
Speaker 2: which is the way that it is described by Reason magazine.
Speaker 2: Trump says he paid zero for the government's eleven billion
Speaker 2: dollar stake in Intel, but he's wrong. He paid for it,
Speaker 2: and it is a very dangerous and evil idea, one that,
Speaker 2: by the way, was has been floated by Bernie Sanders.
Speaker 2: This is why I said, you can take a New
Speaker 2: York City democrat like Trump out of New York, but
Speaker 2: you can't take the socialism out of him. He's it's
Speaker 2: burned in there. We overthrow elected governments in Iran for
Speaker 2: doing the same thing, didn't we. You know, in Iran,
Speaker 2: they took over the elected government there back in what
Speaker 2: was it nineteen fifty three, I.
Speaker 8: Think fifty three on Operation HX.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they elected a guy that wanted the nationalized the
Speaker 2: oil industry that was there. So they did a coup
Speaker 2: and they took this guy out and they put in
Speaker 2: the shaw of Iran, which primed to the country in
Speaker 2: terms of blowback that we wound up with the Ayatola.
Speaker 2: Trump negotiated a deal last week for the US government
Speaker 2: to take a substantial ownership stake in an American company,
Speaker 2: says reason Trump's despite his assurances, Trump's socialistic transaction is
Speaker 2: a terrible deal, not only for the parties involved, but
Speaker 2: for the entire US economy. And just like what he
Speaker 2: is doing with the military as police in DC and
Speaker 2: saying he's going to do that in one city after
Speaker 2: the other. He has also said that he is going
Speaker 2: to do this with other companies and other industries as well.
Speaker 2: He is trying to remake our country. He sees himself
Speaker 2: as some kind of an FDR or Lincoln, and quite
Speaker 2: I agree with him on that. I think he is
Speaker 2: like FDR or Lincoln, and I would consign them to
Speaker 2: the hell that's reserved for these types of politicians.
Speaker 8: So when I went and got in my haircut, the
Speaker 8: barbershops in the serreat to be fairly conservative. On the wall,
Speaker 8: they had a painting and it was Donald Trump, Abraham Lincoln,
Speaker 8: and Ronald Reagan sitting in barber chairs getting their haircuts,
Speaker 8: and I was like, yeah, that's about right.
Speaker 2: Well at least they were. Well, they're probably doing with
Speaker 2: passing cards each other with their toes like the dog's
Speaker 2: white poker. It's my great honor to report the US
Speaker 2: is now fully owns and controls ten percent of Intel,
Speaker 2: he said on his social media thing. He said, and
Speaker 2: I paid zero for Intel, all uppercase screaming it's worth
Speaker 2: approximately eleven billion dollars all goes to the USA. Why
Speaker 2: are stupid people unhappy with that? Well?
Speaker 7: How much is this going to cost the American people?
Speaker 2: Yeah? Yeah, yeah. There's no such thing as a free launch,
Speaker 2: but a Democrat don from New York City thinks that
Speaker 2: there is. Under terms of the agreement, the US government
Speaker 2: will make an eight point nine billion dollar investment in
Speaker 2: Intel common stock, said the company. The government's equity stake
Speaker 2: will be funded by the remaining five point seven billion
Speaker 2: dollars in grants previously awarded but not yet paid to
Speaker 2: Intel under the US Chips and Science Act, and three
Speaker 2: point two billion awarded to the company as part of
Speaker 2: the Secure Enclave program. The eight point nine billion dollar
Speaker 2: investment is in addition to the two point two billion
Speaker 2: dollars and Chips grants Intel has received to date, making
Speaker 2: for a total investment of eleven point one billion dollars.
Speaker 2: You see, the Chips thing is an idea that was
Speaker 2: put out there by Biden and by Bernie Sanders, who
Speaker 2: We're going to have the government start to subsidize these industries,
Speaker 2: and that's a big part of the problem. These grants
Speaker 2: were proved under Biden before leaving office. Biden's administration rushed
Speaker 2: to finalize these grants even as Intel was the worst
Speaker 2: performing tech stock in twenty twenty four. Malinvestment is always
Speaker 2: one of the harbingers of socialism, you know, they always
Speaker 2: I wouldn't say harbinger is actually one of the characteristics
Speaker 2: of socialist governments. They always malinvest the money that they
Speaker 2: put in. So the government actually agreed to less than
Speaker 2: initially allocated when the company failed to hit certain milestones,
Speaker 2: but instead of rescinding those grants, as Trump reportedly threatened
Speaker 2: to do, instead he demanded a tenth of the business
Speaker 2: as a result, making the US government Intel's largest shareholder,
Speaker 2: another one hundred and eighty degree flip flop, like he
Speaker 2: did with Epstein and the documents. Right, I'm going to
Speaker 2: get rid of that Chips Act and these subsidies, he
Speaker 2: tells the Conservatives, who should be opposing this stuff, but
Speaker 2: don't because it's Trump. And then he turns around and
Speaker 2: does the same thing. The Chips Act funding was first
Speaker 2: floated by Bernie Sanders. Trump and his allies are now
Speaker 2: issuing talking points that could have come from the socialist
Speaker 2: senator himself because they are socialists themselves. They're fascists. Economically,
Speaker 2: the US government insists on dishing out taxpayer money to
Speaker 2: private companies. If they do that is there any reason
Speaker 2: that it shouldn't. As a US Secretary of Commerce, Howard
Speaker 2: Lutnick says, get a piece of the action. This guy
Speaker 2: is the poster child for corrupt, crony capitalism that is
Speaker 2: really in the mold of the Chinese Communist Party. Lutnik
Speaker 2: and the people in the Trump administration. The most immediate
Speaker 2: risks that Intel's decisions will increasingly be driven by political
Speaker 2: rather than commercial considerations, said Scott Lenna Cocony of the
Speaker 2: Cato Institute. I'm not sure how to pronounce his last name,
Speaker 2: so I'll just refer to him as the Cata Institute.
Speaker 2: As I've said before, when you merge government with religion,
Speaker 2: what you wind up with or church or whatever. What
Speaker 2: you wind up with is government. When you merge government
Speaker 2: with corporations, what you wind up with is government. Government
Speaker 2: always smothers and destroys whatever you think is going to
Speaker 2: come in and help, he said. With the US government
Speaker 2: as its largest shareholder, INTEL will face constant pressure to
Speaker 2: align corporate decisions with the goals of whatever political party
Speaker 2: is in power, the same way that when you ally
Speaker 2: government with churches, the churches will feel the pressure to
Speaker 2: align with the politicians and they will also be rewarded
Speaker 2: if they do, punished if they don't. So again, when
Speaker 2: you mix a company, a corporation with politics, you're going
Speaker 2: to wind up with a political company that is going
Speaker 2: to be making these decisions not based on economic reality
Speaker 2: or the desires of customers. Know, the government becomes their customer.
Speaker 2: Intel's US based competitors might find themselves a disadvantage when
Speaker 2: buying for government contracts or subsidies, winning trade or tax
Speaker 2: really for complying with federal regulations. Private capital might in
Speaker 2: turn flow to Intel and away from leaders and innovation
Speaker 2: in the semiconductor ecosystem, not for economic reasons, but because
Speaker 2: Uncle Sam now has his thumb on the scale, picking
Speaker 2: the winners and the losers. White House National Economic Council
Speaker 2: Director Kevin Hassett told CNBC on Monday that he is
Speaker 2: quote sure, at some point there'll be more transactions, if
Speaker 2: not in this industry, then in other industries. And as
Speaker 2: I said at the beginning of this, it's just like
Speaker 2: the military, police and DC. Now we're going to go
Speaker 2: to other cities, and they're going to go to other companies,
Speaker 2: other industries, and they're going to start partner becoming partners
Speaker 2: and taking over chunks of them, just like the Chinese
Speaker 2: Communist did. And guess what, just like in Chinese Communist
Speaker 2: part you're going to have the leaders of the government
Speaker 2: are to be making special money off of this stuff.
Speaker 2: You talk about insider trading, They're going to be getting
Speaker 2: kickbacks and everything else. Trump has made several such deals
Speaker 2: just since re entering office in January. Of course, you know,
Speaker 2: leaning on Nvidia and AMD, We've never ever had the
Speaker 2: federal government take a share in a corporation like this before,
Speaker 2: and we've never had the federal government putting an export
Speaker 2: tax as they've done on Nvidia and AMD. You know,
Speaker 2: all of this stuff about tariffs was supposed to be
Speaker 2: because we were going to have help manufacturing and that
Speaker 2: means helping exports in this country. And now Trump is
Speaker 2: putting a export tax on what is produced in this country.
Speaker 2: It's absolutely insane and inconsistent everything he does. And of
Speaker 2: course he bought into a rare earth mineral mind in
Speaker 2: the US MP minerals four hundred billion dollar government investment
Speaker 2: made by the Department of Defense, which is now its
Speaker 2: largest shareholder. I will make deals like that for our
Speaker 2: country all day long, said Trump because I don't I
Speaker 2: don't support the constitution right anyway, the Republicans won't likely
Speaker 2: be in power forever. In time, a Democrat president will
Speaker 2: have the same influence on Intel and on other companies
Speaker 2: and other industries. And here's the key takeaway from this.
Speaker 2: I like this quote. An economist at the Competitive Enterprise
Speaker 2: Institute Ryan Young said, both parties are forgetting a cardinal
Speaker 2: rule of politics. Don't give yourself powers that you don't
Speaker 2: want your opponents to have. How many times have I
Speaker 2: said that? You know, look at what Trump is doing
Speaker 2: when he goes out and he does gun control by
Speaker 2: executive order. That's the power that he's put on the
Speaker 2: table aft for La LA to pick up and use.
Speaker 2: And they do that over an over again. So don't
Speaker 2: give yourself powers that you don't want your opponents to have.
Speaker 2: So as this is all happening now, Trump is working
Speaker 2: on commandos going to Mexico, and Ken Klippenstein has been
Speaker 2: the one who has been reporting on this, and he
Speaker 2: has a very long article about time that he has spent.
Speaker 2: The people who's talked to at Special Operations Command North.
Speaker 2: These are people who were previously working on the Arctic
Speaker 2: keeping that secure from the Russian threat, I guess, and
Speaker 2: al Qaeda. You know, you never know what Elchi is
Speaker 2: going to show up in the Arctic. And so now
Speaker 2: they've been repurposed. They've been up there looking for a
Speaker 2: mission because nothing is happening up there, right, so I
Speaker 2: need to justify it. Well, now Trump has given him
Speaker 2: a mission and he's going to repurpose it to go
Speaker 2: after the cartels. And I'm telling you that the cartels
Speaker 2: are going to start attanking infrastructure here or politicians or whatever.
Speaker 2: And if they don't, I think that the Trump administration
Speaker 2: of the people in power in Washington will do a
Speaker 2: false flag to say that it's from them, so they
Speaker 2: can roll out this plan that I showed yesterday that
Speaker 2: the Pentagon has been talking about how the coming wars
Speaker 2: are gonna be fought in the cities against civilians. Trump
Speaker 2: designated international cartels as Enemy number one. The Arctic was
Speaker 2: traded for Mexico. Northern Command, officially responsible for the defense
Speaker 2: of America, was established in November twenty thirteen, long after
Speaker 2: nine to eleven, and unfortunately for them, every other geographic
Speaker 2: fighting area had already been taken. It's not head to
Speaker 2: go to the Arctic. But now they get to go
Speaker 2: to Mexico. So lacking terrorists to kill or counterinsurgencies to fight,
Speaker 2: Soak North was assigned every task under the sun, a
Speaker 2: roller coaster of missions that somehow contributed to quote defending
Speaker 2: the homeland against unconventional threats. On the walls of new
Speaker 2: headquarters are maps of the Arctic Circle from Alaska to Greenland.
Speaker 2: In the midst of Sock North planners or commandos meeting
Speaker 2: Russian spetsnets as they made their way south through the ice.
Speaker 2: Then came Trump, and the Arctic maps were rolled up
Speaker 2: and put away. As the border in Mexico became a
Speaker 2: top priority, defending America would no longer be a femeral
Speaker 2: or a contingency plan set in some mythical future. The
Speaker 2: military was ordered to deal with the immediate threats of
Speaker 2: illegal immigration, drugs, and cartels. But we're going to take
Speaker 2: a quick break. When we come back, you're going to
Speaker 2: see that the Defense Department. This is another thing that
Speaker 2: Trump wants to say. He wants to take it back
Speaker 2: to the War Department, and so we're going to talk
Speaker 2: about that when we come back. It's actually a little
Speaker 2: bit of truth in advertising. As Lance said when we
Speaker 2: were talking about laughed about it, and it's a bit
Speaker 2: more truthful to call the War Department.
Speaker 6: We'll be right back.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 9: Wait a minute, where am I sorry, Jefferson.
Speaker 10: The scoundrels who put America on Central Bank Fiat currency
Speaker 10: used our heads on their coins as some sort of trophy. Despicable.
Speaker 11: This is outrageous, Washington. I spent my life fighting centralized power.
Speaker 11: Now the Federal Reserve monopoly parades us around on their
Speaker 11: monopoly money. Tell me there's some good news to all this.
Speaker 10: Well, there is a coin they can't control, one that
Speaker 10: isn't backed by the Fed, but backed by the Fed
Speaker 10: up the All New David Knight Show Commemorative Coin. Now
Speaker 10: patriots can support a show that won't sell out with
Speaker 10: a limited edition coin that's sure to sell out quickly.
Speaker 9: They say, money talks, and this coin has something worth
Speaker 9: listening to. The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
Speaker 2: Well, it looks like we have an interesting thing that's
Speaker 2: going to be coming up. We have a battle to
Speaker 2: take over the Federal Reserve that Trump is involved in,
Speaker 2: and he's been trying to find a cause to remove
Speaker 2: power I talked about this last week, trying to invent
Speaker 2: a crime in terms of what he had to say
Speaker 2: to Congress about the remodeling of the Federal Reserve, which
Speaker 2: in of itself, I think it's a crime to spend
Speaker 2: that kind of money. But because he got some of
Speaker 2: the details, they want to come after him on the details.
Speaker 2: Even though nobody in Congress cared about James Clapper lying
Speaker 2: to you about surveillance of the American people. But now
Speaker 2: he has a real crime. As I also said at
Speaker 2: the time, this female governor, black female, first one to
Speaker 2: be in the Federal Reserve, and her name is Cook,
Speaker 2: and she took out two loans almost at the same time.
Speaker 2: I think they were two months apart, and in both
Speaker 2: of them she said they were going to be her
Speaker 2: primary residence, except one of them was in Georgia and
Speaker 2: the other one was I think Michigan or Minnesota or
Speaker 2: something like that. And so it was a lie about
Speaker 2: one of them. As a matter of fact. The one
Speaker 2: in Georgia she then put up for rent. So there's
Speaker 2: a paper trail that shows that she lied on her mortgage.
Speaker 2: One the question is is this something that the federal
Speaker 2: government is going to be involved in I don't know
Speaker 2: who actually has jurisdiction there. She has not been charged,
Speaker 2: and she's denying that she did anything wrong. Also a liar.
Speaker 2: But think about the fact that you got the Central Yeah,
Speaker 2: you got one of these people in charge of the
Speaker 2: bank of banks here, the Central Bank, and they're lying
Speaker 2: on their mortgage application, which is crime for other people
Speaker 2: to do it. So she says that she has not
Speaker 2: been charged of the crime. She didn't commit a crime,
Speaker 2: and she says, I'm not leaving. Trump has sent her
Speaker 2: a notice that she has now been I don't know
Speaker 2: relieved the duty or how we phrased it or whatever.
Speaker 2: But it's going to be interesting this back and forth,
Speaker 2: and she, in making her case says, well, we're private,
Speaker 2: you have no jurisdiction over me. So I think it's
Speaker 2: going to be an interesting discovery as part of this.
Speaker 8: A lot of people are like, wait a minute, what
Speaker 8: what do you mean all of those conspiracy theorists.
Speaker 2: He said, the Federal Reserve is private, and now you
Speaker 2: got one of the Board of Governors is going to
Speaker 2: make a big fight with Trump over it being private,
Speaker 2: and it'll be interesting. Of course, the left will come
Speaker 2: out and say, yeah, it's private and that's a good thing.
Speaker 8: That's what we need. We've got a lot of comments here.
Speaker 8: Shaubrey says that sacred piece of cloth is more rights
Speaker 8: than the people talking about the flag burning, right, Yeah,
Speaker 8: and dp Io says, listen to what they say, don't
Speaker 8: pay attention to what they do, and you will be happy.
Speaker 8: That's right. Just trust what they say, ignore their actions,
Speaker 8: turn your brain off and it'll all be fine. Nights
Speaker 8: of the storm. Good to see you, Jason, if you're
Speaker 8: doing well. I foresee that by the end of the
Speaker 8: day there will be a trend of flag burning videos
Speaker 8: on Twix, Twitter, slash X. Yeah, we'll have to wait
Speaker 8: and see. Maluten Malankovic. Bailing out Intel was a horrible idea.
Speaker 8: It's just a grift for Israel. Now it's an Intel,
Speaker 8: an Israeli company, I do.
Speaker 2: I don't know. They've got got an Asian CEO. I
Speaker 2: think that he chrisized that's the lead up to all
Speaker 2: this stuff, and that was softening them up for the takeover,
Speaker 2: because you know, if you if you push back against Trump,
Speaker 2: you know that he's in that you're in his sites.
Speaker 8: Yeah, yeah, makes it very clear who he's going after.
Speaker 8: He's not subtle. I boost how did Trump buy Intel
Speaker 8: with what money? Was there money in the sixty six
Speaker 8: y six bill to buy private industries? Who sits on
Speaker 8: the board. Is there a conflict of interest when the
Speaker 8: government sets laws and owns a company.
Speaker 2: Yeah, there is. Yeah, there's absolutely no way. Again, if
Speaker 2: we go back to the ninth and tenth Amendment, there
Speaker 2: is no authority for the government to do this. So
Speaker 2: therefore they don't have that authority. And it's a bad
Speaker 2: idea because it is socialism, as we see put out
Speaker 2: there by Bernie Sanders.
Speaker 8: And socialism does not lead to good outcomes nights of
Speaker 8: the storm. So my taxes are paying for processors, but
Speaker 8: I can't afford a decent video card for my PC.
Speaker 8: That's good the future grand.
Speaker 2: That's absolutely the case.
Speaker 8: Yeah, he says.
Speaker 2: All the money will go to the few people, and
Speaker 2: you'll own nothing, not even a PC.
Speaker 8: Right, you'll get one of the You'll get a chrome
Speaker 8: book from now on. I was a big AMD fan
Speaker 8: back in the youth. Half the price of a Pentium
Speaker 8: and faster Birdhouse blues? Does this help or hurt Elon's
Speaker 8: neuralink chip design?
Speaker 2: What were you to say was not AMD.
Speaker 7: Oh just well, I guess he's comparing it to pentium.
Speaker 7: But just the whole thing of AMD versus in video.
Speaker 7: When people get all tribal about one or the other
Speaker 7: and then they're run by the same family, the same
Speaker 7: family owns them. They're run the CEOs are cousins.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's well, you're gonna wind up like in China,
Speaker 2: where the same quote unquote family, the mafia is going
Speaker 2: to own everything of any importance.
Speaker 8: Never go against the family. Niburu twenty nine. Emperor Trump's
Speaker 8: main goal is to destroy the USA, just as he's
Speaker 8: destroyed every business he's ever Pilford, Well, he's doing a
Speaker 8: good job. Yeah, Solo Cat nineteen eighty. The Yankee Pledge
Speaker 8: of Allegiance is an oath to an idol, a double sin.
Speaker 2: That's right. And you realize that when you know they
Speaker 2: softened it by the time I was in school. They
Speaker 2: softened it in nineteen fifties they added under God. But
Speaker 2: if you take that out of the Pledge of Allegiance,
Speaker 2: you have and it was put together by the Grand
Speaker 2: Army of the Republic, which was the kind of the
Speaker 2: union of the Union soldiers, who you know, it is
Speaker 2: kind of their their club, and you know it's one nation, indivisible, right,
Speaker 2: and you're pledging allegiance to that. They wanted that, and
Speaker 2: they wanted the government schools to teach their version of history,
Speaker 2: and just prior to World War Two, the protocol was
Speaker 2: that you were to do the pledge with your right
Speaker 2: hand extended out, palm down. Does that look familiar that
Speaker 2: it's like a Nazi salute? Right? Well they changed that
Speaker 2: to put your hand over your heart, right because of
Speaker 2: the Nazis, And then in the nineteen fifties they added
Speaker 2: under God to soften it. But we know where it
Speaker 2: came from, and you know what the spirit behind it is.
Speaker 8: It's a not often that you have to retire a gesture,
Speaker 8: you know. But the Nazi's got rid of that one.
Speaker 8: You can't name someone Adolph anymore, you know. They managed
Speaker 8: to get rid of quite a few things. Solo cat
Speaker 8: oh No Defy Tyrants, seventeen to seventy six. Governor of
Speaker 8: Florida Ron de Santis implementing a new stand with Israel
Speaker 8: license plate with star of David on it. Wonder who
Speaker 8: is ruling over us?
Speaker 7: Wow, it's gonna be a extra penalty to rear end
Speaker 7: that one destroying the star of David.
Speaker 2: Yeah, like that.
Speaker 7: It's called just rear ending. It's also a hate.
Speaker 8: Crime, calling my lawyer right now solo cat nineteen eighty
Speaker 8: Because the left called Trumpet fascist early on for no reason,
Speaker 8: he is now inoculated against the accusation now that he
Speaker 8: is being a fascist.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 8: They've been screaming it for years at this point, and
Speaker 8: the left considers anyone right of Stalin a fascist. It's
Speaker 8: very reminiscent of Herbert mark Use. His entire thesis was
Speaker 8: that if you're not continually pushing leftward, you are immediately
Speaker 8: in danger of falling into fascism. So anyone that does
Speaker 8: not push further and further left immediately has to be
Speaker 8: attacked as a fascist.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. And then, as a Soli Cat said, that
Speaker 2: is inoculated him. That's the real vaccine. He's got this.
Speaker 8: They tried to impeach him and failed, so he's safe
Speaker 8: from that. They ran him through the court system and
Speaker 8: inoculated against any sort of criminal prosecution because of that,
Speaker 8: the streaming fascists. So now when he's doing fascist things,
Speaker 8: you really, ah whatever.
Speaker 2: And they've inoculated him from being impeached as well. I mean,
Speaker 2: the Democrats could come out and they could impeach him
Speaker 2: for a lot of the unconstitutional things that he's not.
Speaker 2: This is just the latest one. But you know, they
Speaker 2: could come after him for some real substantive charges. But
Speaker 2: because they came after him for a bunch of nonsense,
Speaker 2: the first time he's been inoculated against impeachment that as well,
Speaker 2: and the tribal fall in line behind him in support.
Speaker 2: He's speaking about how the leftists move. All the sub
Speaker 2: college students have to pretend to be leftists in order
Speaker 2: to succeed. This is a Northwestern University survey that was done.
Speaker 2: They surveyed fourteen hundred and fifty two interviews with students
Speaker 2: at several different colleges over a period of two years.
Speaker 2: Eighty eight percent said that they pretended to hold more
Speaker 2: leftist views and they truly endorse to succeed socially or academically.
Speaker 7: I mean, this is a surprise to anyone at this
Speaker 7: point that the colleges are extremely yeah biased and controlled
Speaker 7: by hardcore leftist interests.
Speaker 2: Yes, but this is kind of the human nature. This
Speaker 2: is why Rod Dreyer wrote his book Lived Not by Lies,
Speaker 2: which was a title that SOLDI Knitsuen had for his
Speaker 2: final essay before he was kicked out of Soviet Union
Speaker 2: loved not by lies. And in that so then it's
Speaker 2: and said, you know, because of pressure from above and
Speaker 2: because of peer pressure, you know, the Milgrim experiment and
Speaker 2: the Ash experiment. Because of those kinds of pressures, we
Speaker 2: live by lies, but just don't believe them yourself. At
Speaker 2: the very least, if you don't have the courage to
Speaker 2: push back against that, at least don't start to believe
Speaker 2: it yourself, because you realize that as you and so
Speaker 2: do the left. You know, it's this whole thing about
Speaker 2: the more you repeat this stuff, eventually you can get
Speaker 2: yourself to believe it double thinking. They assimilate you that way.
Speaker 8: I also think it has to do with the fact
Speaker 8: that college is so expensive. If you're paying this much
Speaker 8: money for something you don't believe in, that, you're going
Speaker 8: to psychologically reject that on some level. You're going to
Speaker 8: have to start rationalizing, like there's got to be something
Speaker 8: here that's truthful in evst.
Speaker 2: Well, I mean, it's tuition has just exploded. I said before,
Speaker 2: when I went to USF back in the late seventies,
Speaker 2: my books cost more than my tuition did had to
Speaker 2: have a lot of books, and even buying them you
Speaker 2: used it was more than the tuition. But the government
Speaker 2: has subsidized tuition to get it so expensive. Anytime the
Speaker 2: government subsidizes something, it gets more expensive. And the first
Speaker 2: exhibit of that is what's happened to tuition at colleges.
Speaker 2: But this is also nothing new. When I was in college,
Speaker 2: I had to take some core courses and I don't
Speaker 2: even remember what the subject was, but the very first class,
Speaker 2: the guy got up and started, you know, lecturing us
Speaker 2: about how wonderful Marx and Lenen were. And it wasn't
Speaker 2: a course on Marxist and Leninu's ideas. It was not
Speaker 2: supposedly a political course, but he was going to make
Speaker 2: it a political course. And so I just walked straight
Speaker 2: out there the first class and dropped the class, just
Speaker 2: removed it, because it's like, there's no way that I'm
Speaker 2: going to play his game, and I know that he's
Speaker 2: going to flunk me. And that's what these students are saying.
Speaker 2: Seventy eight percent of students said that they self censor
Speaker 2: their beliefs surrounding gender identity. Seventy two percent do it
Speaker 2: on politics, sixty eight percent on family values. More than
Speaker 2: eighty percent said that they had submitted class work that
Speaker 2: misrepresented their views in order to align with professors. For many,
Speaker 2: this has become second nature, an instinct for academic and
Speaker 2: professional self preservation. And that's what Rod Dreer said in
Speaker 2: the preface to his book. He said he'd had people
Speaker 2: who had immigrated to America from Eastern Europe, and they
Speaker 2: had come from communist countries and to tolitarian countries, and
Speaker 2: they were very concerned about what they were seeing in America,
Speaker 2: that people were self censoring themselves. And Rod Dreer, who
Speaker 2: was working in academia, I think he said, had other
Speaker 2: people say that they will speak in hush tones when
Speaker 2: they're in a restaurant, thinking that somebody is going to
Speaker 2: hear them, that knows them and is going to get
Speaker 2: them in trouble at the university. And it's like, I
Speaker 2: don't want to have anything to do with this. That's
Speaker 2: like that it's a detlitarian Marxist system and it is
Speaker 2: thoroughly permeated the universities. When it comes to gender ideology.
Speaker 2: For example, eighty seven percent of students identified as heterosexual
Speaker 2: and said that they believe that there are only two genders.
Speaker 2: Seventy seven percent said biological sex, not gender identity, should
Speaker 2: be recognized in areas like sports, healthcare, or data collection,
Speaker 2: but they would never voice these opinions in public. This
Speaker 2: is what's so wrong about our university system that is
Speaker 2: so heavily subsidized by the government. So living by lies, Yeah,
Speaker 2: they truly are. That's a way of life. So a
Speaker 2: lot of back and forth about Trump's hands, and of course,
Speaker 2: if you can find that article there and pull up
Speaker 2: the picture he had a few days ago, very awkwardly,
Speaker 2: it looks like evidently he did it himself because he
Speaker 2: didn't even try to blend it out, and he tried
Speaker 2: to cover up a bruise on it hand. And then
Speaker 2: he showed up in the office as he's doing these
Speaker 2: executive orders about flag burning and with no makeup on.
Speaker 2: He's got his one hand covering the other hand. But
Speaker 2: when he moved it away, people could see that was
Speaker 2: deeply bruised. Well, look at those pictures. People are saying, oh, yeah,
Speaker 2: he's dying and all the resta stuff. It's like I
Speaker 2: saw that on my dad. For the longest time, he
Speaker 2: was on blood Thinner's he had cardiac issues. He had
Speaker 2: had a blood clot when he was in his early
Speaker 2: forties that caused him to go blind in one eye.
Speaker 2: So they kept him on blood dinner. All of the
Speaker 2: whole time I knew him, he was on blood dinner,
Speaker 2: and he would get bruises that would look like that
Speaker 2: that were very bad, just over nothing. He didn't even
Speaker 2: remember hitting anything, And so you know, there may be
Speaker 2: some They've always said that he has some circuitary issues,
Speaker 2: which obviously are the case with his swollen ankles, and
Speaker 2: he's seventy eight years old. But anyway, both his friends
Speaker 2: and enemies are getting all excited about this, a lot
Speaker 2: of speculation about it. I think that, uh, it is,
Speaker 2: and he's got it on his other hand as well. Uh,
Speaker 2: this is just something that is part of old age
Speaker 2: that is there. And the real issue is not his hand.
Speaker 2: I think they've talked more about his hand than they
Speaker 2: have the executive orders that he signed with a with
Speaker 2: a bruised hand, And that's the problem that I have
Speaker 2: with him.
Speaker 8: Yeah, I'm looking at the picture for the down this
Speaker 8: article where they are comparing the ankles of Vladimir Putin
Speaker 8: and Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: Is it? Yeah?
Speaker 8: This is well, we're doing forensic analysis on the ankles
Speaker 8: of world leaders. Look Putin's and very normal ankles, Trump's
Speaker 8: thick and swollen ankles. What does this say.
Speaker 7: Which world leader has the best ankles?
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's exactly what they've tried to do. So Trump's
Speaker 2: physician says that the bruising is consistent with minor soft
Speaker 2: tissue irritation from frequent handshaking and the use of aspirin.
Speaker 2: That's not true. There's something else going on, and it's
Speaker 2: it's probably one of these bloodthending medications that are there.
Speaker 7: People are just so eager to shake his hand that
Speaker 7: they go a little overboard as everyone always wanting to
Speaker 7: shake his hand one after another.
Speaker 2: You know, remember when when Trump got into that arm
Speaker 2: wrestling thing with Macron, you know, this first term. You know,
Speaker 2: he shakes his hand and the two of them were
Speaker 2: grimacing and Macron starts laughing about you. So, yeah, he
Speaker 2: likes to give people really firm handshakes as a sign
Speaker 2: of how powerful he is. I think as part of
Speaker 2: that is ego. But yeah, that is what they do
Speaker 2: focus on. And you know, but this is finally before
Speaker 2: we just kind of general news here, let's before we
Speaker 2: get into something else. He's talking about changing the Department
Speaker 2: of Defense to make it the Department of War. And
Speaker 2: it was always called the Department of War until nineteen
Speaker 2: forty nine. And so after World War II, we created
Speaker 2: the National Security State, which has not provided security for
Speaker 2: the nation. Instead, what it has done it's this got
Speaker 2: us involved in one war after the other that we
Speaker 2: were not attacked, and so they've been using the military
Speaker 2: as a international police force. And it's not about the
Speaker 2: defense of this country. But we were talking about it,
Speaker 2: and we were laughing about it, as Land said, well,
Speaker 2: at least they're going to be honest about it for
Speaker 2: a change, because that's what it truly is about. It's
Speaker 2: not about defending this country. It's simply about getting us
Speaker 2: involved in wars. And that's not how you defend the country.
Speaker 2: You defend the country by keeping us out of wars.
Speaker 2: But such it's so focused on wars. I thought it
Speaker 2: was kind of indicative of the lies that we've been
Speaker 2: told by the Pentagon since World War II. And you
Speaker 2: know this they called the Defense Department and all the
Speaker 2: rest of this stuff. But it reminds me of Dave
Speaker 2: Pells routine of what you said about Trump, he said,
Speaker 2: this guy is truly amazing. He says, he'll he'll come
Speaker 2: out of these enclaves. These elites are right, and he'll
Speaker 2: tell you won't believe what they're talking about doing in there,
Speaker 2: and he'll tell you all the stuff they're going to do.
Speaker 2: And then he said, and then the SOB will go
Speaker 2: back in and do it himself. He'll join them. He
Speaker 2: told you what they're actually doing. And I thought, that's
Speaker 2: that's exactly right. So he's gonna tell us, Yeah, it's
Speaker 2: a Department of War and we're going to have some
Speaker 2: more wars. It's, you know, not the Department of Peace.
Speaker 2: So we're going to take a quick break. When we
Speaker 2: come back, we're going to talk about what's going on
Speaker 2: with Israel. Uh, there's some information that's come out, of course,
Speaker 2: there's also been a couple more attacks, and uh, there's
Speaker 2: not really any question, folks, that it is genocide. The
Speaker 2: own their own statistics at the idea of the Israeli
Speaker 2: Defense Force show that it is a genocide, and it
Speaker 2: probably manipulated those as well to make it look not
Speaker 2: quite as bad as it is.
Speaker 8: Jump out to the serious topics. So let's finish off
Speaker 8: with the comments that we have. Don't frag me Bro
Speaker 8: says PCs are going to go away when the net
Speaker 8: required biometric access, the PC will be a dummy terminal
Speaker 8: and all apps will be remotely served, all data saved
Speaker 8: only online. That's gonna alien poop evolution. You can build
Speaker 8: awesome PCs to rent video games on. That's right. You're
Speaker 8: not going to own anything, Nights of the.
Speaker 7: Digital version of the own nothing and be happy.
Speaker 8: Agenda except think video games are so bad you can't
Speaker 8: even be happy anymore. Knights of the Storms reponding, don't
Speaker 8: frag me Bro. I went, I want went to get
Speaker 8: a land card at Walmart about a year ago, and
Speaker 8: they didn't have hardly any PC parts available. Everything was
Speaker 8: for tablet or cell phones. Slash accessories.
Speaker 2: Yeah, people, no radio shack anymore.
Speaker 8: Actually, there is a radio shack nearby and severe Ville.
Speaker 8: That's where I had to send my wife out. She
Speaker 8: was out running errands and one of the cables that
Speaker 8: got shipped here was faulty, so she went and picked
Speaker 8: it up at radio shack.
Speaker 2: I want if they sell any components that you built
Speaker 2: stuff from it.
Speaker 7: That's the thing. They mostly just sell like phone accessories.
Speaker 7: These days. Yeah, there was that one radio shack in
Speaker 7: Texas that had the sign for radio shack at least
Speaker 7: for a while, but it was owned by a local
Speaker 7: you know mom and pop that had components. But every
Speaker 7: other radio shack is just some Well.
Speaker 2: The problem is is that, you know, kind of the
Speaker 2: component stuff in the hobbyist industry where you build stuff
Speaker 2: on boards that was kind of killed by very high
Speaker 2: level integrated circuits and so, you know, people just started
Speaker 2: getting circuits that would do functions as opposed to you know,
Speaker 2: we used to do wirewrap boards where we would you know,
Speaker 2: get sockets and we'd put the components in the sockets
Speaker 2: and then we'd connect them all using wirewrap because you
Speaker 2: could undo that pretty easily rather than solder.
Speaker 12: Bad stuff is gone places like Fries Electronics, and there
Speaker 12: was that, like I said, one small mom and pop
Speaker 12: shop that closed right before we moved out of Texas
Speaker 12: that had like Arduino and other hobbyist.
Speaker 7: Stuff like Fries carried and all is now gone. You
Speaker 7: can only get that online anymore.
Speaker 2: I don't think there's a Fries.
Speaker 8: Pretty sure they went they went out of they all
Speaker 8: went under.
Speaker 2: Yeah, probably because they were some components. Yeah, probably because
Speaker 2: of lockdown of Trump.
Speaker 8: Yeah, it all, it's all going away, bulldog. The governments
Speaker 8: want you worshiping them. Wait until the United Nations makes
Speaker 8: it mandatory. That's right. Audi, m r R. Good to
Speaker 8: see you. Audi. Hope you're doing well.
Speaker 2: Retro radio.
Speaker 8: Yeah, I just saw an article at MSN that Memphis, Tennessee,
Speaker 8: is among the cities that President Trump tends to send
Speaker 8: more troops to resolve high crime.
Speaker 2: Of course, it's run by Democrats.
Speaker 8: As I predicted over a year ago, Trump is turning
Speaker 8: the US into a perpetual police state occupied by I
Speaker 8: need to scroll that downlands occupied by its own military,
Speaker 8: and it will never cease.
Speaker 2: That's right. Once they take the power, they're not going
Speaker 2: to give it back.
Speaker 8: Nibaru twenty nine. It's all right to rear end that
Speaker 8: Florida license plate as long as you have a rainbow
Speaker 8: symbol on your vehicle. That's right. You need a gay
Speaker 8: license plate up front if you're going to hit the
Speaker 8: Israeli is license plate in the back.
Speaker 7: Okay, one diversity points.
Speaker 2: We're gonna take a quick break, folks, and we'll be
Speaker 2: right back.
Speaker 1: You are listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: Well, Israel has done a double tap strike on Gaza's
Speaker 2: NASA hospital, killing journalists and then also rescue workers. And
Speaker 2: when we talk about double tap strike, do you remember
Speaker 2: the video called that They called it collateral murder. It
Speaker 2: wasn't collateral damage, but it was collateral murder. The video
Speaker 2: of the people in the gunship I think one thirty
Speaker 2: ghost ship or something. But they had recorded the video
Speaker 2: where first they shot up an area where there was
Speaker 2: a guy at camera and they recorded that and then
Speaker 2: they waited until clearly marked ambulance came and as they
Speaker 2: were as they grabbed the cameraman and other people who'd
Speaker 2: been shot in the first attack, they then put them
Speaker 2: in the ambulance and then they shot up the ambulance.
Speaker 2: And that was leaked by Wiki leaks, and that really
Speaker 2: was the thing that set the government on fire to
Speaker 2: go after Julian massage. They called it collateral murder. Well,
Speaker 2: similar things just happened. The Associated Press said the initial
Speaker 2: strike was at ten ten am guds the time, hit
Speaker 2: the fourth floor of the hospital, which was a surgical
Speaker 2: operating room and a doctor's residences, killing at least two people.
Speaker 2: Once rescue workers and journalists arrived at the scene. A
Speaker 2: second strike hit, killing eighteen more people, a double tap
Speaker 2: attack that was caught on video. There's really Outlet nine
Speaker 2: magazine published the investigation last month. They said the IDF
Speaker 2: has adopted using double tap strikes as a standard procedure
Speaker 2: in Gaza. They said the video of the double tap
Speaker 2: strike on Nasser Hospital is footage of murder quote unquote
Speaker 2: again collateral murder. According to Reuters, the initial strike killed
Speaker 2: one of its contractors, a cameraman who was killed in
Speaker 2: near a live broadcasting position operated by Reuters on the
Speaker 2: upper floor of the hospital. And this is an article
Speaker 2: from anti war dot com. They said they have a
Speaker 2: photo account with Reuters and they've used many of this
Speaker 2: photograph of this guy in his work. The Israeli newspaper
Speaker 2: Heretz reported that the Israeli military said that the initial
Speaker 2: strike targeted a camera, which they claimed was a Hamas
Speaker 2: camera that was being used to observe IDEA forces. They
Speaker 2: say that Israeli tank shells struck the area, then another
Speaker 2: one was fired to make sure the camera was destroyed. Nettanna,
Speaker 2: who later claimed that double tap strike was a tragic mishap.
Speaker 2: So first they said, yeah, it was people who were
Speaker 2: taking pictures for the other side, you know, just like
Speaker 2: at Harvard or whatever. The other four journalists that were
Speaker 2: killed in the Israeli attack on the hospital we're mentioned
Speaker 2: here freelancers for Associated Press or for some of them
Speaker 2: work for Middle East IE or Al Jazeera or whatever.
Speaker 2: But Israeli forces killed sixty four Palestinians in Gaza over
Speaker 2: twenty four hours, the last twenty four hours. This is
Speaker 2: a running update that's done every day on anti war
Speaker 2: dot com. If you go there you can see how
Speaker 2: many dozens of people have been murdered the last Over
Speaker 2: the last day. In terms of civilians, Israeli forces killed
Speaker 2: sixty four Palestinians wounded two hundred and seventy eight over
Speaker 2: the previous twenty four hour period, as relentless US backed
Speaker 2: Israeli attacks continue across the Strip. Among the dead were
Speaker 2: nineteen Palestinians killed while attempting to get food at the
Speaker 2: aid sites and Netna who has It's now been reported
Speaker 2: from an Israeli newspaper that he has shut down seven
Speaker 2: ceased fire deals, deals that have been agreed to by
Speaker 2: the other side, and yet he's shut them down, including
Speaker 2: very early on when they could have released hostages. This
Speaker 2: is one of the reasons why you have so many
Speaker 2: people in Israel who are protesting Netanyahu. Over the course
Speaker 2: of the war in Gaza, Israel has repeatedly dug up
Speaker 2: roadblocks to cease fire deals with Hamas, even when the
Speaker 2: Palestinian group accepted its conditions. According to senior American and
Speaker 2: Israeli officials interviewed by The Program, Israel blocked a ceasefire agreement.
Speaker 2: In the program is Israel's Channel thirteen investigative program he blocked.
Speaker 2: Israel blocked the ceasefire agreement on seven different occasions during
Speaker 2: nearly two years of its devastating military campaign against the Gainstgaz.
Speaker 2: Officials said Neatna, who was chiefly responsible, often bowing to
Speaker 2: pressure from far right ministers, including bezil El Smotrik and
Speaker 2: National Security Minister Edemar Ben Gvir. A spokesperson for the
Speaker 2: US State Department, Matthew Miller under Joe Biden, said that
Speaker 2: at the start of the war in October of twenty
Speaker 2: twenty three, Hamas was ready to release some hostages. We've
Speaker 2: been trying to get through to the government of Israel
Speaker 2: to tell them that, Miller said, but Washington could not
Speaker 2: get anyone there. To take us seriously, referring to the
Speaker 2: Israeli leadership, I don't think they wanted to have that end.
Speaker 2: Smotrick has told the Idea of Chief that anyone who
Speaker 2: does not evacuate Gaza City can die of hunger or
Speaker 2: they can surrender. Israel's Channel twelve also reported that Natanyahu
Speaker 2: has said that he has Trump's full support for the
Speaker 2: planned offensive to take over Gaza City, but that he
Speaker 2: has limited time. Smotrick has told the head of the
Speaker 2: Israeli military that anyone who remains in Gaza City after
Speaker 2: an Idea of evacuation order can die of hunger or surrender.
Speaker 2: You can besieged them. Simtric reportedly told the IDEF Chief
Speaker 2: of Staff, whoever doesn't evacuate, don't let them no water,
Speaker 2: no electricity. They can die of hunger or surrender. This
Speaker 2: is what we want and you are capable of doing it.
Speaker 2: There have been a lot of apologists here in America
Speaker 2: for Israeli policy who have said, that's not what's happening.
Speaker 2: This is just the fog of war and other things
Speaker 2: like this, or as Huckabee cynically said, well you know,
Speaker 2: they're getting rushed by a bunch of these people, and
Speaker 2: so they get scared in a panic and they fire
Speaker 2: into the crowd. That's what's happening. No, that's not what's happening.
Speaker 2: Many people who are there said that they shot people
Speaker 2: who were fleeing, shot them in the back. But this
Speaker 2: is policy, this siege, policy of starvation is their policy,
Speaker 2: and they're not even quiet about it. It's just that
Speaker 2: it's not reported by American media for the most part,
Speaker 2: or the Trump administration's Zionists will put it in a
Speaker 2: different light. Eighteen Palestinians starved to death in Gaza over
Speaker 2: three days due to Israeli siege. So this is something
Speaker 2: that's happening on a regular basis. Then we have US
Speaker 2: Ambassador Kushner. Is that a familiar name, Well, it turns
Speaker 2: out that that's Jared's dad. He's now triggered a diplomatic
Speaker 2: fight with France because he's ambassador there, demanding that France
Speaker 2: do more for Israel. Charles Kushner, the convicted fell father
Speaker 2: of Jared Kushner, pardoned by President Trump then in his
Speaker 2: first administration and then appointed as US Ambassador to France,
Speaker 2: triggered a diplomatic fight on Sunday by writing a letter
Speaker 2: to the French government, accusing them of not doing enough
Speaker 2: for Israel.
Speaker 8: Not that they're not doing enough for us.
Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly, that's a point. It's like, who's the ambassador,
Speaker 2: who's the loyal to On the eighty first anniversary, he
Speaker 2: said of the Allied liberation of Paris, which ended the
Speaker 2: deportation of Jews from French soil, I write out of
Speaker 2: deep concern over the dramatic rise of anti Semitism in France,
Speaker 2: and so here we go. I would say that in reality,
Speaker 2: people like Kushner are actually making anti Semitism great again.
Speaker 2: That's what they're they're doing.
Speaker 8: Yeah, these are the these are the ambassadors for the
Speaker 8: Semitic people. They have trouble, they have problems. Not that
Speaker 8: most of these guys are actually from the Middle East, if.
Speaker 2: You want to know, if you want to know why
Speaker 2: people are getting upset about this. And actually there was
Speaker 2: a an i Bet piece on RT and they said
Speaker 2: net Yahoo may be winning this God's awar, but he's
Speaker 2: losing the war of public opinion. And that's absolutely true.
Speaker 2: That's what John Stewart said. I don't agree with John
Speaker 2: Stuart anything except that he said that. He said, you know,
Speaker 2: his situation he said, I want to see Israel succeed,
Speaker 2: and they're poisoning people's opinion about Israel with a sustained
Speaker 2: attack against civilians.
Speaker 7: We've got some videos on the board about both of
Speaker 7: those things, one of John Stewart talking about Gaza and
Speaker 7: one of Yahoo talking about the massive bought armies that
Speaker 7: the Palestinians are mobilizing to completely drown out little Israel's
Speaker 7: tiny amount of media control.
Speaker 2: Yeah, let's play that first. I'll go to the John
Speaker 2: Stewart genocide and Gaza video.
Speaker 13: I feel like I'm watching something that is so self
Speaker 13: evidently inhumane and horrific, and to be told that I
Speaker 13: have to shut.
Speaker 2: Up because he's going to be getting a letter from.
Speaker 13: J by speaking out, I would say the opposite.
Speaker 8: I think not.
Speaker 13: I think they're putting the likelihood of a surviving Jewish
Speaker 13: state much more at risk with this type of action.
Speaker 13: I think they're the ones.
Speaker 14: That are.
Speaker 13: That are being anti If you want to define Mett
Speaker 13: Yahou with the definition of anti Semitism, would probably have
Speaker 13: to bomb himself. How is the world not stepping in
Speaker 13: and stopping this atrocity? I don't understand this in any
Speaker 13: way shape.
Speaker 5: I mean it's boggling my mind. It's worse than just
Speaker 5: not stepping in.
Speaker 15: It's our weapons that are that are that are enforcing
Speaker 15: this siege, that is enforcing this mass starvation. Eight in
Speaker 15: November of twenty twenty fourth, then like eight months ago,
Speaker 15: the International Criminal Court the issue to warrant for the
Speaker 15: arrest of Benjamin Antenna, who for the war crime of starvation,
Speaker 15: right eight months ago, eight months ago, and the United
Speaker 15: States responded by trashing the International Criminal Court, even under Biden,
Speaker 15: and then under Trump imposing sanctions on the International Criminal Court.
Speaker 15: And so the message to Israel was very clear, you
Speaker 15: can get away with worse.
Speaker 5: And so then for almost three months in early this year.
Speaker 15: Israel cut off all food, all medicine, all water into
Speaker 15: the Gaza.
Speaker 8: SA wasn't it's a siege.
Speaker 13: It's a military siege.
Speaker 15: Yes, that we are deeply complicit in. It could not
Speaker 15: happen without.
Speaker 2: Us, and they openly talk about it.
Speaker 13: We use our leverage. Surely, the United States can't believe
Speaker 13: that this is in the best interest of the region.
Speaker 13: And when Donald Trump said something like finish the job,
Speaker 13: what job is he talking about?
Speaker 5: What does that mean?
Speaker 15: Well, I mean the Trump plan made it pretty clear
Speaker 15: the mass expulsion of all Palestinians from Gaza, and that
Speaker 15: is official Israel.
Speaker 13: Do you believe in the people of Israel would would
Speaker 13: second that there must be a robut there there are.
Speaker 15: There are many Israelis who are appalled by this.
Speaker 5: Absolutely.
Speaker 15: But the problem is when a leader like Natagnyah who
Speaker 15: can get away with this again and again and again,
Speaker 15: it actually makes him stronger.
Speaker 5: The way to weaken NATANYAHUO.
Speaker 15: At home will be to show Israeli's that when Natayah,
Speaker 15: who does these brutal things to the Palestinians, it actually
Speaker 15: that there are consequences, not human consequences, in human lives.
Speaker 15: I don't want in Israeli to die, but there have
Speaker 15: to be some consequences.
Speaker 5: So Israeli see that this is not good for them.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, you know what Jared Kushner's dad says, as
Speaker 2: anti Zionism, as anti Semitism, plain and simple. That was
Speaker 2: in the letter that he wrote to the French government.
Speaker 2: Now there's actually people like him that are responsible for
Speaker 2: us more than anyone else. And when we look at
Speaker 2: what they're saying, we need to get the message out
Speaker 2: to more people in Israelthough there's been a lot of
Speaker 2: pushback Neatna, who was barely elected. He had to have
Speaker 2: three different elections before he could put together parliamentary coalition
Speaker 2: to govern. And there's been a lot of pushback in
Speaker 2: Israel against these policies. But Netanya, who's very worried that
Speaker 2: people are going to see more information showing what he's doing,
Speaker 2: so he's responding against the bots.
Speaker 14: The propaganda walh.
Speaker 2: Look, it's a propaganda war. Well, he knows it's a
Speaker 2: propaganda war because that's what he's doing.
Speaker 14: To put it mildly, I think there are vast forces
Speaker 14: that are raided against us, among other things, the algorithms
Speaker 14: of the social network that are driving a lot of
Speaker 14: everything else, you know, and people who really know, and
Speaker 14: they're the foremost, foremost people in this field in the world,
Speaker 14: they're telling me that about sixty percent of the responses
Speaker 14: on the social media are bots. They can categorically say
Speaker 14: they're bots.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, absolutely. So you know what do we do
Speaker 2: about this? Well, one of the.
Speaker 7: Ways we've got vast forces a raid against us with
Speaker 7: all these bots, as though the Palestinians are you know, yeah,
Speaker 7: putting out massive bought forms to drown out anything that
Speaker 7: they could possibly do with their media control.
Speaker 2: Well, he's got some really high powered cybersecurity people like
Speaker 2: that pedophile, but they just sent back to Israel. That's
Speaker 2: what we got to have him. He's going to fight
Speaker 2: the bot armies for exactly. But they also have the
Speaker 2: ad L and their CEO Jonathan Greenblat kind of said
Speaker 2: the quiet part out loud. Listen to this. Think about this.
Speaker 16: The national symbol, let's say, of Rizbola, is a rifle.
Speaker 2: That's what's on their flag.
Speaker 16: The national symbol of Iran the Islam Cup.
Speaker 2: Could be Iran got to burn those flags. That's what's
Speaker 2: on their flag.
Speaker 16: The national symbol of Israel is the shield. It's the
Speaker 16: Star of David. The symbol of our people is not
Speaker 16: and of war. It's an instrument of defense. The thing
Speaker 16: that most embodies are entire ethos is not harming others.
Speaker 16: It's again creating a better world. This is fundamental to
Speaker 16: our tradition for thousands of years. And so the idea
Speaker 16: that our national anthem would be the tippo would be
Speaker 16: the hope, I should say our it's the Israel's national anthem.
Speaker 16: So the idea that our national anthem would be the
Speaker 16: oura the hope, I should say our it's the Israel's
Speaker 16: national anthem.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he's just like Jared Kushner's dad.
Speaker 8: No loyalty in the United States.
Speaker 2: No loyalty.
Speaker 8: It's a matter of what he can extort and pull
Speaker 8: for the United States, how much he can take from
Speaker 8: the American people while bullying them and causing them to submit.
Speaker 2: Yeah, our country. And I thought it was kind of
Speaker 2: interesting when he says it's a shield. It was kind
Speaker 2: of the coat of arms of the Rothschilds. That's the
Speaker 2: cultic signal symbol they call the Star of David. But
Speaker 2: I said, Trump, and this is going back to Charles
Speaker 2: Kushner's letter to the French government. Trump and I have
Speaker 2: Jewish children and share Jewish g children. I know how
Speaker 2: he feels about anti Semitism. Yeah, it's misplaced loyalties all around.
Speaker 2: As a reminder, you know, Kushner was jailed because he
Speaker 2: had hired a prostitute to seduce his own brother in
Speaker 2: law and arranged to secretly film the encounter as part
Speaker 2: of a witness intimidation scheme. Reports Information Liberation and guess
Speaker 2: who the prosecutor was in that Chris Christie Christi better
Speaker 2: watch his back. It's going to get the Bolton treatment
Speaker 2: pretty soon.
Speaker 7: I can play the video in this article if you want.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, firstly he says, is that the one with
Speaker 2: Chris Christie talking about the prosecution.
Speaker 5: He said, one got yard because Frankly hums it down.
Speaker 8: He's the one who fired you.
Speaker 7: Yes, and you believe that, right, You believe that because
Speaker 7: there's history between the two of.
Speaker 17: You, between me and his father, not between me and him.
Speaker 8: You can understand why he takes it personally.
Speaker 17: Yes, And though would you.
Speaker 6: Separate your experience if your father has been put in
Speaker 6: jail from the prosecutor who put him in jail.
Speaker 17: If my father was guilty, I would mister Kushner pled guilty.
Speaker 17: He admitted the crimes, and so what am I supposed
Speaker 17: to do as a prosecutor. I mean, if a guy
Speaker 17: hires a prostitute to seduce his brother in law and
Speaker 17: videotapes it, and then since the video tapes with sister
Speaker 17: to attempt to intimidate her from testifying before, do I
Speaker 17: really need any more justification than that? I mean, it's
Speaker 17: one of the most loathsome, disgusting crimes that I prosecuted
Speaker 17: when I was a US attorney, and I was used
Speaker 17: attorney New Jersey, Margaret. So we had some loathsome and
Speaker 17: disgusting crime going on there.
Speaker 8: When you managed to discuss Chris Christie, you've truly achieved something.
Speaker 8: You've set new lows.
Speaker 2: Can you imagine somebody doing that? Yeah, I can, somebody
Speaker 2: like Jeffrey Epstein. And here we have another connection with
Speaker 2: all of this stuff, right, the Kushners and the Epstein's
Speaker 2: and the Trump's all together with all that.
Speaker 8: It's a big club. And you ain't in it. Thankfully,
Speaker 8: you can be thankful you're not in it.
Speaker 2: So he was, you know, he played guilty, and he
Speaker 2: was convicted and jailed, but given a full unconditional pardon
Speaker 2: by Trump at the end of his first term, and
Speaker 2: then at the beginning of his second term, Trump made
Speaker 2: him US ambassador to France. Now he is lecturing foreign
Speaker 2: countries as though he is a beacon of morality, and
Speaker 2: he is representing the interest of a different country as
Speaker 2: American ambassador, he's representing the interest of Israel. All of
Speaker 2: that is what we're seeing from Trump administration. If you
Speaker 2: thought the job of US ambassador was to represent the
Speaker 2: interests of the US, you would be wrong rights, information liberation,
Speaker 2: absolutely right. Now, his concern is Israel, as you point out,
Speaker 2: Travis Chris Menahan says that quotes Mike Huckabee, who said
Speaker 2: to the Israelis, you are the chosen people. If someone
Speaker 2: is angry at God, he will be angry at the
Speaker 2: people who re present him. I think this is a
Speaker 2: real problem. This is why I pushback against Christian Zionists.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, but what they're doing in Gaza is not
Speaker 2: representative of God and is not representative of what He
Speaker 2: wants them to do. And you've got people like Huckabee
Speaker 2: who think that they can force God's hand to do
Speaker 2: what they want to do, which is to come back
Speaker 2: and take them away so they don't have to die.
Speaker 2: And they're more than willing to cheer the mass murder
Speaker 2: of civilians another part of the world, hoping that that
Speaker 2: will result in them not having to die. I'm absolutely
Speaker 2: disgusted with their theology and their politics, and I got
Speaker 2: to say that is not Christianity, and I got to
Speaker 2: say that to non believers because this is a disgusting
Speaker 2: perversion of Christianity that these people are teaching.
Speaker 7: Play the video if you want of Huckaby of this.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, sure, go ahead.
Speaker 18: The ambassador has a very interesting view of anti semitisms.
Speaker 18: Us who grew up in America there was anti Semitism.
Speaker 18: Of course, I experience, of all experienced that. The ambassador
Speaker 18: has a very interesting view of Then he says, people
Speaker 18: are you can't understand that the Sempis's if people who
Speaker 18: are anti Semitic, it's because they're against thought, against the
Speaker 18: Banchelid and we are represented his people, and that's why
Speaker 18: they're anti Semitic. Otherwise that doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 19: Interesting view, it's interesting you. It's another view that since
Speaker 19: we could say it's the chosen people, So people are
Speaker 19: who are you?
Speaker 2: What are you?
Speaker 19: Were taking big shots chosen people?
Speaker 20: And that's part of it is that because you are
Speaker 20: the chosen people, given a chosen place for a chosen purpose.
Speaker 20: And if someone is angry at God, he'll be angry
Speaker 20: at the people who represent him. So I tell people
Speaker 20: anti Semitism is irrational. There's no reason for it unless
Speaker 20: you understand the spiritual reason, which is what I believe
Speaker 20: is that the heart of it. It is not the
Speaker 20: left versus the right, It is good versus evil. It
Speaker 20: is the creator versus those who rebel against the creators.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, being descended from Abraham, even if they are,
Speaker 2: there's some question about that. But even if they are
Speaker 2: descended from Abraham, that does not give them a pass
Speaker 2: to fight against God and his Messiah. And that's the
Speaker 2: real spiritual issue that's there. And Hikabee has lost his way.
Speaker 8: Yeah, there's no bloodline that gives you a free pass
Speaker 8: on murder.
Speaker 2: That's right aside, those who follow Christ are his chosen people,
Speaker 2: and He has chosen. That's made very clear in terms
Speaker 2: of the Bible. That's the true issue. You know, don't
Speaker 2: think that just because you are a particular ethnic group
Speaker 2: that God honors that and excuses whatever you do. There
Speaker 2: is no salvation outside of Christ, and not all of
Speaker 2: Israel is Israel. And they just illustrate that it was
Speaker 2: always the people who were faithful to God. It was
Speaker 2: always a part of Israel that followed God and a
Speaker 2: part of a larger part of Israel that did not
Speaker 2: follow God all throughout the Old Testament. I think within
Speaker 2: the next two to three weeks, Trump said, You're going
Speaker 2: to have a pretty good, conclusive ending to all of this.
Speaker 2: He said in the Oval office. And so I remember
Speaker 2: Smotrix said, you can do whatever you want, kill as
Speaker 2: many people as you want. We've got to do this quickly, though,
Speaker 2: and that's the marching orders that they got. This is
Speaker 2: a collusion that is coming from our ZIONUS president. Yeah,
Speaker 2: do whatever you want to these people. This is mass
Speaker 2: murder of civilians and that is the essence of what
Speaker 2: genocide is truly about. And as I said at the
Speaker 2: beginning of the program, it says really data itself that
Speaker 2: shows that eighty three percent of the guy's of war
Speaker 2: dead are civilians. When we talk about whether or not
Speaker 2: a war is justified, we have a lot of different
Speaker 2: aspects to that. Number one, where we attacked, okay, check
Speaker 2: that mark off. But number two, did you try to
Speaker 2: avoid civilian deaths by trying to limit this to combatants?
Speaker 2: And of course we lost our way in World War Two,
Speaker 2: both sides did, and we've been attacking civilians everybody has
Speaker 2: since then. That's unjust. Even if it has now become
Speaker 2: the standard in commonplace, that is still unjust. And then
Speaker 2: the third thing I would mention is that you want
Speaker 2: to try to your purpose of your war is to
Speaker 2: stop the killing, especially of civilians, and so you should
Speaker 2: try to stop the war early, and you should try
Speaker 2: to avoid killing civilians, but that's not what they have done.
Speaker 2: Figures from a classified Israeli military intelligence director at database
Speaker 2: show that at least eighty three percent of Palestinians killed
Speaker 2: with civilians, with Gadza Health authorities recording fifty three thousand
Speaker 2: deaths by May. Despite public statements asserting lower civilian losses,
Speaker 2: Israeli government and army spokespeople claimed a one to one
Speaker 2: or a two to one civilian to combat ratio combatant ratio,
Speaker 2: but the classified data reveals a much higher civilian share.
Speaker 2: Figures in the database show eighty nine hundred named fighters
Speaker 2: dead or probably dead, with seventy three hundred and thirty
Speaker 2: certain and fifteen hundred and seventy probable. They lie NonStop,
Speaker 2: said one person, both the military echelon and the political echelon. Well,
Speaker 2: I mean that's it. When you look at any government statistics,
Speaker 2: whether they're talking about unemployment figures or talking about inflation,
Speaker 2: they lie about everything, and so these numbers are probably
Speaker 2: not as bad as reality. The reality is probably worse.
Speaker 2: Human rights groups argue that the data bolsters the genocide claim.
Speaker 2: Experts note that an eighty three percent civilian kill rate
Speaker 2: in Gaza is exceptionally high, comparable only to Rwanda in
Speaker 2: a couple of other places like that, rising to more
Speaker 2: than eighty six percent if probable deaths are excluded. So
Speaker 2: we've always called Rwanda a genocide, but you know this
Speaker 2: is not allowed to be called a genocide because you
Speaker 2: do that. That's a blood libel, says Mark Levan.
Speaker 6: I think so.
Speaker 2: The Army database says eighty three percent the Gaza dead
Speaker 2: were civilians, a proportion of civilian slaughter that has few parallels,
Speaker 2: even in modern time, where it has now become relatively
Speaker 2: acceptable to target civilians and civilian areas. Israeli forces killed
Speaker 2: four aid seekers near Gaza City, so at a hospital
Speaker 2: and witnesses. These are people who were trying to get food.
Speaker 2: Israeli forces kill them as they were traveling through a
Speaker 2: military zone south of Gaza City, and the deaths add
Speaker 2: to the growing coal of Palestinians killed while seeking food
Speaker 2: as parts of the Gaza Strip plunge into famine and
Speaker 2: Israel's military camps up activity in northern Gaza ahead of
Speaker 2: a planned offensive to seize the largest city there. A
Speaker 2: new Hampshire democrat who also appeared Sunday on Face the
Speaker 2: Nation said that the Israeli blockade in Gaza is quote
Speaker 2: a shameful black mark on humanity, that the world has
Speaker 2: allowed this to happen, and that Israel is allowing this
Speaker 2: to happen. Netanya, who is the point at which the
Speaker 2: obstruction is happening, she said, he needs to look at
Speaker 2: what he is doing and change his position. The four
Speaker 2: Palestinians were killed when troops opened fire on a crowd
Speaker 2: that was headed to a site run by the Israeli
Speaker 2: backed American contractor Gaza Humananitarian Foundation, or GHF. It occurred
Speaker 2: hundreds of meters away from the site, said eyewitnesses. The
Speaker 2: gunfire was indiscriminate. They said the shooting happened while many
Speaker 2: people fled. Some people fell to the ground after being shot.
Speaker 2: The Israeli military and GHF did not immediately respond to
Speaker 2: requests for comment. Since GHF first began operating nearly three
Speaker 2: months ago, the UN says hundreds of Miusettings have been
Speaker 2: shot and killed by Israeli defense forces and foreign military
Speaker 2: contractors at or near its aid sites, and we've had
Speaker 2: one former marine who is working for GHF as a
Speaker 2: contractor has gone on record talking about the murder of
Speaker 2: civilians who are trying to get food, that he saw
Speaker 2: it happening all the time. Of course, we've had a
Speaker 2: lot of doctors who have volunteered to help people talk
Speaker 2: about not just a double tap strike with bombing or
Speaker 2: missiles on a hospital, but double tap strikes on children,
Speaker 2: and physicians say, shot once in the chest and then
Speaker 2: while they were down, they hit them a second time
Speaker 2: in the head to make sure they were dead. And
Speaker 2: these were children. More than two thousand pal Stings have
Speaker 2: been killed more than thirteen five hundred wounded while seeking
Speaker 2: aid at food distribution points or along the convoy routes
Speaker 2: used by the UN and other aid groups. According to
Speaker 2: Gaza's health ministry, that is there. Well again, nettnaw Whuo
Speaker 2: is winning in Gaza, but he is losing public opinion
Speaker 2: in the West. And this is why they are pushing
Speaker 2: so hard to destroy our First Amendment and using Trump
Speaker 2: to do it. And of course Trump has no respect
Speaker 2: for the First Amendment. It is simply about the tribal
Speaker 2: politics that he supports. We are going to do. You
Speaker 2: want to do some of the comments before we.
Speaker 8: Take a break, talking about college students, censoring themselves Nebaru
Speaker 8: twenty twenty nine, nineteen seventies. All the unemployable college Marxist
Speaker 8: graduates went into teaching and.
Speaker 2: Politics, so many of them got jobs at USF.
Speaker 8: What those degrees are only good for indoctrinating the next
Speaker 8: generation of people, dougle ug playing the game to get
Speaker 8: good grades. Yeah, and then you got to play the
Speaker 8: game to keep your job. And you got to play
Speaker 8: the game and play the game. Play the game, Doug
Speaker 8: to double O seven. If you want to pass your classes,
Speaker 8: you have to give the right answers quote unquote answers.
Speaker 8: The left is right, Brian de McCartney. Blood thinners are
Speaker 8: toxic and do not address the issue. That's right, aud
Speaker 8: E m R. R.
Speaker 2: Soud.
Speaker 8: Americans are going to see that the US military's existence
Speaker 8: is not about protecting us but occupying us permanently. Yes,
Speaker 8: Knights of the Storm that bruises from him backhanding the
Speaker 8: first Amendments.
Speaker 2: That's good.
Speaker 6: I like that.
Speaker 8: Don't frag me bro. US government will use World War three,
Speaker 8: world War three as a meat grinder to get rid
Speaker 8: of more men that might push back and organize a revolution.
Speaker 8: You know, the World wars were just as you said
Speaker 8: a meat grinder. They got rid of a lot of
Speaker 8: very good fighting stock of Europe and a lot of
Speaker 8: people that would have stood up and said no.
Speaker 2: Well all else fails, They take you to wars. Gerald
Speaker 2: Sentia says Trends Research and trans General Transgeneral dot common. Yes, yeah,
Speaker 2: take you the same place. But yeah, code night save
Speaker 2: ten percent.
Speaker 8: Yeah, Niabaru twenty twenty nine, changing the title to War
Speaker 8: Department in preparation for Trump's war with China beginning in
Speaker 8: twenty twenty seven. Yeah, maybe we can have another boxer
Speaker 8: rebellion Brian dev McCartney.
Speaker 7: But the whole Defense Department thing was aspirational at best.
Speaker 7: But is it a good thing that they're no longer
Speaker 7: playing lip service to us being the good guys that
Speaker 7: are just defending ourselves.
Speaker 8: No, what, No, just the war Department.
Speaker 2: Now we can get this. Now, we can get rid
Speaker 2: of this term national security that they've used as a
Speaker 2: magic incantation to do every criminal, unconstitutional, secretive thing that
Speaker 2: they can imagine.
Speaker 8: No more defense, only War's angry tiger's den Israel has
Speaker 8: become a monster that the US feeds purely devilish.
Speaker 2: Yeah, absolutely, Yeah, we become the monsters that we fight,
Speaker 2: don't we. I mean, it's amazing to see them enacting
Speaker 2: the same policies that the Nazis did.
Speaker 8: And so callously, carelessly, completely unfeeling a Syrian girl, I
Speaker 8: believe NETANYAHUO is facing corruption charges if he stops being president,
Speaker 8: and according to it is really law, you can't get
Speaker 8: rid of a wartime president. So we can expect war
Speaker 8: for the rest of Netanyahu's life. Yeah, well, that's been
Speaker 8: the plan for a long time. When you see all
Speaker 8: the countries they want to invade and take over destabilize.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, he's been going after Iran forever. And if
Speaker 2: you want a permanent war, go after Iran. You will
Speaker 2: never subdue an area of that size. And people that
Speaker 2: has a level of ad management that they do.
Speaker 8: Don't frag me. Bro Radio Shack used to have everything
Speaker 8: you need to build remotely activated.
Speaker 14: I ed.
Speaker 8: Oh, well, you know, you learn something new every day. Yeah,
Speaker 8: don't go building IED's folks.
Speaker 2: Oudi m r R.
Speaker 8: The journalist who wrote the article and the Starving Children
Speaker 8: of Gaza, was directly targeted and killed by Israel.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yep, we gotta get rid of those bots. Everybody
Speaker 2: is a bot. If they don't say what. Who wants
Speaker 2: them to say, Well, we're gonna take a quick break
Speaker 2: and we'll be right back.
Speaker 1: Is what I'm listening to. The David Night Showing, No
Speaker 1: Analyzing the Globalist Next Move.
Speaker 21: And now the David Nut Show, Elvis the Beatle and
Speaker 21: the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the Oldies
Speaker 21: channel at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 8: Welcome back, folks. Thank you for still being here with us.
Speaker 8: We really do appreciate it, and of course we thank
Speaker 8: APS Radio as well. I want to take this to
Speaker 8: plug briefly. We can thank you all enough. You've want
Speaker 8: to go to Davidknight dot news. You can see all
Speaker 8: the avenues of support for the show.
Speaker 2: There.
Speaker 8: There is subscribe star dot com, forward slash the David
Speaker 8: Night Show where you can sign up monthly and it'll
Speaker 8: send the payment automatically. There's cash app sell Bitcoin. There's
Speaker 8: the po box which is David Knight, Peobox nine ninety four,
Speaker 8: Kodak Tennessee three seven seven six four. Hey, I got
Speaker 8: it right. You can also go to Trends Journal dot com.
Speaker 8: As you mentioned, with promo code Night, you get ten
Speaker 8: percent off That works out to be about two fifty
Speaker 8: a week, which is cheaper than a cup of coffee
Speaker 8: at this point, so you're getting a great value for money. There.
Speaker 8: There's David Knight dot Gold, which Tony rdburn has kindly
Speaker 8: set up. He's got Wolfpack where you can sign up
Speaker 8: for a monthly subscription and get gold or silver. It's
Speaker 8: a good way to get outside the Fiat monetary system.
Speaker 8: There's urnc store dot com where again with promo code Night,
Speaker 8: you get ten percent off their products. They can help
Speaker 8: you with your health and hopefully stay outside of the
Speaker 8: medical industrial complex.
Speaker 2: And not only health products, but also books that you
Speaker 2: get like Jedickgriffin's A World Without Cancer, very important to
Speaker 2: educate yourself.
Speaker 8: Then our newest sponsor here is Homestead Products dot chop.
Speaker 8: They've got all kinds of different high quality made in
Speaker 8: America products that they work very very hard on. This
Speaker 8: is Bellium black tea. It looks like very high quality
Speaker 8: ta I'm not a t expert by any means, but
Speaker 8: it's a herbal remedy for the common cold, as it says,
Speaker 8: bronchiness and other inflammation of the upper respiratory tract. And
Speaker 8: again that's Homestead Products dot shop or ten you get
Speaker 8: ten percent off with promo code night as well. So
Speaker 8: go to Homestead Products dot shop. They have a numerous
Speaker 8: number of products that you might need in your life,
Speaker 8: might want, and you can support a good business which
Speaker 8: is very very pro liberty.
Speaker 2: Like the products that they do too. They've done some
Speaker 2: very unique and useful things. You know, when you look
Speaker 2: at a lot of these prep products, most of them
Speaker 2: are just starch or whatever. Yeah, it's all just it's
Speaker 2: very healthy and very thoughtful.
Speaker 8: I'm a little congested right now, so I'm curious to
Speaker 8: see if this tea would help. And of course you
Speaker 8: cannot forget Jacklossanbooks dot com where you can get the
Speaker 8: Civil Defense Manual. It's a two volume set. It's designed
Speaker 8: to be large so you can read it, and it
Speaker 8: has a ton of info in it. It's also only
Speaker 8: in book form because when the Internet goes down, if
Speaker 8: it goes down, you're not going to have access to it.
Speaker 8: You want to have a hard copy of it. You
Speaker 8: want to learn to start, how to defend yourself in
Speaker 8: your community, how to find water, how to protect your supplies.
Speaker 8: You don't want to be caught in a scenario where
Speaker 8: you don't know how to do these things. You don't
Speaker 8: want to be put in a scenario where you have
Speaker 8: to make some kind of choice where it's either your
Speaker 8: family or someone else. You don't want to be put
Speaker 8: in that situation. You don't want to be the guy
Speaker 8: has to make that immoral choice.
Speaker 2: Great practical advice on self defense, on organizing your community,
Speaker 2: as well as on medical and food issues as well.
Speaker 2: So great source.
Speaker 8: Yeah, Jacklawson books dot com.
Speaker 2: Yes, Well, as we look at what is ahead, let's
Speaker 2: talk about ai Elon Musk is out. He's, you know,
Speaker 2: his very first involvement that I was aware of. I'm
Speaker 2: sure that he became a multi billionaire getting these government
Speaker 2: contracts by greasing the poems of politicians, no doubt about that.
Speaker 2: But the first public, like large donation that he made
Speaker 2: was a million dollars to Andrew Yang when Yang was
Speaker 2: running for president, and his key issue and only issue
Speaker 2: at that point in time, Yang's was was universal basic income.
Speaker 2: And Musk is adamant about that and still is. He's
Speaker 2: still talking about it, except he's now changed it from
Speaker 2: universal basic income to universal high income. I think of
Speaker 2: reminds me of George Carlin, who said they call it
Speaker 2: the American dream because you've got to be asleep to
Speaker 2: believe it. If you believe that this is going to
Speaker 2: be high income, you must be high in order to
Speaker 2: believe that.
Speaker 7: We're going to print money. We're all rich. I mean,
Speaker 7: we just give a little bit of money when you
Speaker 7: can make everyone a billionaire.
Speaker 2: That's right, that's right. So both Musk as well as
Speaker 2: Sam Altman talking about that. Sam Altman's talking about how
Speaker 2: we can just give everybody trillions of tokens. And he's
Speaker 2: already made the rounds with his orb where you look
Speaker 2: into it and it gets a biometric data sample of
Speaker 2: your retina, and then in exchange for that, he gives
Speaker 2: you a little token of some crypto worthless crypto that
Speaker 2: he's invented and has absolutely nothing behind it.
Speaker 8: Oh, real quick, before you move on to get a
Speaker 8: comment from Night to the Storm, here says, is David
Speaker 8: Ever going to get doctor LaGuardia on his doomsday Book
Speaker 8: of Medicine would be a fantastic opanion to Jack Lawson's
Speaker 8: book set. So I just want to.
Speaker 2: Well, I have to Yeah, let's look that up. I'm
Speaker 2: not familiar with that. So thank you Jason for mentioning
Speaker 2: that we'll have to look that up. Yeah. Good, so
Speaker 2: it's hard to say exactly what that moment is, but
Speaker 2: there will come a point when no job is needed.
Speaker 2: You can have a job if you want it and
Speaker 2: sort of a personal satisfaction, but the AI will be
Speaker 2: able to do everything and do it better than you,
Speaker 2: says Elon Musk. Click this is what George Gilder said
Speaker 2: about Silicon Valley. He said they are neo Marxists, just
Speaker 2: like Carl Marx fantasized and said with the Industrial Revolution,
Speaker 2: we have so much material wealth and manufacturing capacity that
Speaker 2: there is no need for anybody to be poor. We
Speaker 2: just need to make sure that the government can redistribute
Speaker 2: income to people adequately. And that is now what the
Speaker 2: people that George Gilder calls the neo Marxist of Silicon Valley.
Speaker 2: That's what they're selling everybody, and it is a lie,
Speaker 2: just like it's a lie that the universal income is
Speaker 2: going to be high. If they give you something, it
Speaker 2: will be very basic, a very basic life that's going
Speaker 2: to be there anyway. That's the way they're selling this. Now,
Speaker 2: that's the way that Sam Maltman is doing it as well.
Speaker 2: Musk has framed this not as a handout but as
Speaker 2: a societal adaptation to technological progress, a way to create
Speaker 2: a prosperous star Trek future rather than a negative terminator one.
Speaker 2: Well Bloomberg was harping on the same thing as well,
Speaker 2: Michael Bloomberg when he ran for president, and he was saying,
Speaker 2: we have to do it so they don't come after
Speaker 2: us with guillotines. So the terminator future is where humanity
Speaker 2: rises up and comes after the the artellect masters that
Speaker 2: are out there, the artificial intelligence masters. Os Hugo de Garis,
Speaker 2: he had it spot on at the very beginning. He
Speaker 2: realized that it was going to be a war of
Speaker 2: the human elites against the rest of humanity, and they
Speaker 2: were going to use artificial intelligence as their weapon. Society
Speaker 2: could become fragmented. Individuals could suffer from depression as they
Speaker 2: no longer feel a meaning or a purpose in their lives.
Speaker 2: Said Elon Musk As if your job right now that
Speaker 2: so many people have is working at a fast food joiner,
Speaker 2: does that give meaning to your life? That's not giving
Speaker 2: means to life. But meaning in our lives is not
Speaker 2: based on the job that we have. It's based on
Speaker 2: our relationships with people that we have, and our relationships
Speaker 2: with God the things that give us meaning, and we
Speaker 2: should not be looking to people like Elon Musk, Michael Bloomberg,
Speaker 2: Sam Altman, or Trump for clues about what is meaningful
Speaker 2: in life. These are people who have absolutely no meaning
Speaker 2: in their life. They have focused, and they're very good
Speaker 2: at it. They have focused on accumulating money. And what
Speaker 2: is the profit a man to gain the entire world
Speaker 2: and lose his own soul? That question of two thousand
Speaker 2: years ago has never been more appropriate to ask each
Speaker 2: and every one of these would be masters of our
Speaker 2: lives here. So if the computer can do it, and
Speaker 2: the robots can do it, and they can do everything
Speaker 2: better than you, then does your life have meaning? Well,
Speaker 2: it's clear that our life has no meaning to Musk
Speaker 2: to the rest of these billionaires, they think that they
Speaker 2: should be our masters, and they think their life is meaningless.
Speaker 2: Tech leaders say that revenue can be shared under a
Speaker 2: massive wealth redistribution system. Suddenly, an idea that was once
Speaker 2: seen as a socialist policy that would reward idleness is
Speaker 2: one of Ai Boom's hottest acronyms. And I just see
Speaker 2: this as yet another socialist utopian experiment like the Aneida
Speaker 2: community up in New York or whatever. Sam Altman says
Speaker 2: he now thinks that instead of money, everyone could get
Speaker 2: an ownership share and whatever the AI creates that would
Speaker 2: allow the wealth accumulated by AI to be spread across
Speaker 2: the population, he said, calling the idea universal extreme wealth.
Speaker 2: There we go, ue w sounds like an Arab country.
Speaker 7: Well, he's even nicer and more generous than musk who
Speaker 7: only want us to have high wealth. This guy's going
Speaker 7: to give us extreme wealth.
Speaker 2: That's right. Yeah, so we go from basic to high
Speaker 2: to extreme. He imagined the scenario in which every human
Speaker 2: is given a trillion tokens as a basic unit of
Speaker 2: information that large language models use each year to buy
Speaker 2: or to sell or treat as personal wealth. And he's
Speaker 2: already been doing this, as I said with his little orb.
Speaker 2: Mark Benioff, CEO Salesforce, has said that up to half
Speaker 2: of the workforce at his company is now AI. He
Speaker 2: is an evangelist for universal basic income and said in
Speaker 2: The Pandemic that he saw the COVID nineteen stimulus checks
Speaker 2: from Trump as a model for broader income distribution. That's
Speaker 2: what I said. At the same time in twenty twenty,
Speaker 2: I said, this is programming for people. It is it
Speaker 2: is moving the overturn window. Now here's the questions. Okay,
Speaker 2: and this is a good, good question to ask these people.
Speaker 2: If jobs are obsolete, then we have to assume that
Speaker 2: raw materials mind themselves, that no one is needed to
Speaker 2: form that energy is free and unlimited. And yet that
Speaker 2: is not the case for their data centers, is it?
Speaker 2: In this scenario, How does anyone get paid anything? Who
Speaker 2: is paying whom and with what money are they paying?
Speaker 2: Where does the electricity come from to power the AI? Well,
Speaker 2: of course it'll be the Federal Reserve and tariffs, right,
Speaker 2: all this magic stuff, magic money, And this is the
Speaker 2: magic monetary theory of the technocracy is that we are
Speaker 2: all just going to have universal income, whether it is basic, high,
Speaker 2: or extreme, it's just all going to show up someday.
Speaker 2: And we've been saying this from the very beginning. You
Speaker 2: go back and look at what Henry Ford said. He
Speaker 2: said he wanted to with mass production to make the
Speaker 2: cars cheaply enough that the people who worked in his
Speaker 2: factory making the cars could afford to own a car.
Speaker 2: But if we don't have any jobs, who are they
Speaker 2: producing stuff for and who are they giving it to? Well,
Speaker 2: I think the obvious answer is to the few people
Speaker 2: who own everything, all the robots will be working for them.
Speaker 2: They will not be working for you. Their task is
Speaker 2: going to be to control and to contain you, to
Speaker 2: make sure that you don't learn anything useful. And that's
Speaker 2: where the AI has a very unique role in terms
Speaker 2: of its psychological aspects of control, keep you from having
Speaker 2: any aspirations, to keep you from doing anything different, to
Speaker 2: pacify you. And that's why these universal welfare programs are
Speaker 2: so dangerous. When you go back, and I've mentioned this before,
Speaker 2: Charles Murray and his book Losing Ground, talking about how
Speaker 2: damaging the War on Poverty had been to families and
Speaker 2: poor communities, and how devastating it had been creating dependency
Speaker 2: and all the rest of this stuff that was used
Speaker 2: for welfare reform by the Reagan administration. That was philosophically
Speaker 2: what they referred to. But now even Charles Murray, who
Speaker 2: wrote the book Dumbing Us Down, now he is a
Speaker 2: cheerleader for universal basic income, which is nothing other than
Speaker 2: welfare done universally. Musk's groc said that Elon Musk Universal
Speaker 2: high income theory suggests that advanced AI and automation could
Speaker 2: eliminate the need for traditional jobs. That's what the writer did.
Speaker 2: He asked Groc, how silly is Musk's universal high income theory,
Speaker 2: and it said, well, it is a bold and speculative
Speaker 2: idea that incites both intrigue and skepticism. Whether it is
Speaker 2: silly depends on how one evaluates its feasibility. Economic implications
Speaker 2: are underlying assumptions. The silliness likely stems from the lack
Speaker 2: of a concrete plan. Musk's predictions, spanning from twenty sixteen
Speaker 2: to twenty twenty five, remain vague on implementation. How do
Speaker 2: we fund universal high income? How do we manage societal transition?
Speaker 2: How do we address inequality during the shift? Without specifics
Speaker 2: at risks being dismissed as utopian optimism, especially given his
Speaker 2: track record of ambitious and sometimes delayed promises. That's his
Speaker 2: own large language model summing up the man, which is
Speaker 2: and he said, if no one is working, tell me
Speaker 2: who is going to be paying the taxes and who
Speaker 2: is buying what and with what money? And Groc says
Speaker 2: that is a good question. It highlights a potential circular
Speaker 2: logic flaw in the universal high income concept, especially in
Speaker 2: a fully jobless scenario where Ai handles all production and
Speaker 2: then Mish writes here Altman, Musk and Benioff describe a
Speaker 2: world in which everyone is useless. Everyone gets free money,
Speaker 2: but where does the money come from? Again, this is
Speaker 2: the technocrafts version of the modern monetary theory or the
Speaker 2: magic money tree. Let's assume that tempers of the people
Speaker 2: are not useless. How do they get paid from the
Speaker 2: free money that they give to everyone else. This doesn't scale,
Speaker 2: and no one can say where the money will come from.
Speaker 2: We'll see all of the money, all of the wealth,
Speaker 2: is to come from all of us and go to
Speaker 2: the handful of billionaires that want to own everything. This
Speaker 2: is a socialist mecca. No one has any money, no
Speaker 2: one gets paid, everyone shares the wealth. It's kind of
Speaker 2: like the paraphrase of the criticism of the communists. So
Speaker 2: they would say, well, the Soviet Union, they pretend to
Speaker 2: pay us, and we pretend to work. Except I guess
Speaker 2: nobody's going to pretend anymore. So there's not gonna be
Speaker 2: any payment, and it's not gonna be work. No one
Speaker 2: can explain how anything gets produced, because like in socialism,
Speaker 2: nothing gets produced. That's the hallmark of it. It's just
Speaker 2: like you take a look at some of the Scandinavian countries.
Speaker 2: They have been living off of the accumulated capital of
Speaker 2: previous generations prior to socialism. They're getting poor and poor
Speaker 2: as time goes on, and that is going to happen
Speaker 2: to all of us.
Speaker 8: And of course many people have pointed out that the
Speaker 8: US has basically been bankrolling their military budget through NATO
Speaker 8: many of these European countries that have practiced socialism, so
Speaker 8: that's another thing they're not having to pay for themselves.
Speaker 2: That's right. Yeah, just wait until they start paying for that.
Speaker 2: Things are going to go down really really quickly, especially
Speaker 2: Yea and Germany's borrowing. Fred Mertz is barring money in
Speaker 2: order to build a military machine again in Germany. That's
Speaker 2: the outcome of these policies.
Speaker 7: This is a something about the I can't remember which
Speaker 7: country it is. One of the ones that everyone holds
Speaker 7: up is oh, look they've got all these, you know,
Speaker 7: very socialist policies of free healthcare and all that, and
Speaker 7: yet they're doing fine. So surely socialism will work. But
Speaker 7: if you look at it, the actual amount of money
Speaker 7: that they spend per person on these government handout programs
Speaker 7: is less then we're currently spending purpose in America currently,
Speaker 7: it's just that less people are taking advantage of these
Speaker 7: socialist things there, and that they don't have all the
Speaker 7: same socialist stuff that we have here. So it is
Speaker 7: actually less socialists in terms of the actual amount of
Speaker 7: money being spent.
Speaker 2: Yes, well, these people are under no illusions. They know
Speaker 2: exactly what they're doing. If you look at Cloward and Piven,
Speaker 2: they pointed out that the purpose of the welfare state
Speaker 2: was to collapse society so they can build their authoritarian
Speaker 2: structure after that. And it wasn't happening quickly enough for
Speaker 2: the people in America, so they wanted to open up
Speaker 2: the borders and bring people in from other countries and
Speaker 2: put them on the welfare state so they could collapse
Speaker 2: the system. This is all about collapsing the system, and
Speaker 2: this is about these guys coming out on top afterwards.
Speaker 2: That's one of the reasons why they're pushing this so much.
Speaker 1: Well.
Speaker 2: Ian Milk Gilchrist says death is not the opposite of life.
Speaker 2: The opposite of life is the machine. He's a British
Speaker 2: psychiatrist and this is coming from Xos, a news out
Speaker 2: of the UK. He says, We've become very good at
Speaker 2: seeing the parts, but we completely lost sight of the whole.
Speaker 2: Paul Kingsnorth's book Against the Machine is due to be
Speaker 2: published in September. The book is an account of the
Speaker 2: technological cultural matrix that is enveloping all of us, from
Speaker 2: the first Industrial Revolution to the rise of AI. This
Speaker 2: book shows how the hollowing out of humanity has been
Speaker 2: a long game and how our very soul is now
Speaker 2: at stake. Against the Machine is a spiritual manual for
Speaker 2: dissonance in the technological age, and I think that J. R. R.
Speaker 2: Tolkien has a great deal to talk to us about
Speaker 2: that as well. That was one of his themes that
Speaker 2: he always kept arkening back to.
Speaker 8: You could tell that Tolkien was very much a man
Speaker 8: of the soil, the earth. He liked agriculture and agrarian societies.
Speaker 8: He did not enjoy the industrialization of the world. You
Speaker 8: could see just the way he wrote about the Shire
Speaker 8: and the Hobbits, and how it's from their perspective. You know,
Speaker 8: there's other characters that you do follow, but the majority
Speaker 8: of the book is generally spent with the perspective of
Speaker 8: a Hobbit and you know, he devotes that much time
Speaker 8: to it because he loves those characters the most. He
Speaker 8: sees them as you know, the true you know, uh
Speaker 8: sees himself in them.
Speaker 2: Yeah that's humanity.
Speaker 8: Yeah yeah, and I think it gave the humanity. It's
Speaker 8: funny as a kid, you know, you read Lord of
Speaker 8: the Rings and you're like, oh, it'd be great to
Speaker 8: go on an adventure like that save the world. As like, oh,
Speaker 8: it'd be nice to live in the Shire, would be
Speaker 8: so nice to live in a just a small town.
Speaker 2: See. That's it. They're enjoying the natural benefits that God
Speaker 2: gave them and the labor of their hands, you know,
Speaker 2: the tobacco that they grow and smoke and all the
Speaker 2: rest of the stuff. And uh, that was something that
Speaker 2: Jefferson would have agreed with Tokien on. He said that
Speaker 2: we are not going to be able to sustain the
Speaker 2: kind of society, the free society that they had put
Speaker 2: together without it being an agrarian society. He was very
Speaker 2: much opposed to industrialism. He saw the machine taking away
Speaker 2: people's souls as much well. Scientists say that they have
Speaker 2: now created talk about a machine, scientists say they've now
Speaker 2: created a new form of life. They claim, this is
Speaker 2: their phrase, it is more perfect than the one that
Speaker 2: nature made. Well, Nature never made any life. Nature is
Speaker 2: not a conscious thought. There's not any intelligence there. It
Speaker 2: has to be an intelligence, conscience that manufactured. And this
Speaker 2: is all about DNA. And it's amazing to me to
Speaker 2: see how people who are involved in DNA and look
Speaker 2: at this code and how complex it is. They spend
Speaker 2: decades to try to decode a small part of it,
Speaker 2: and then, of course did they get it right. You know,
Speaker 2: we've heard for the longest time the Human Genome projects
Speaker 2: said so much of the DNA there is just chunk.
Speaker 2: That means that they don't understand what it is.
Speaker 8: No reason for it, throw it out.
Speaker 2: And that's something that should alarm us even more as
Speaker 2: they start messing with something that they quite obviously don't
Speaker 2: fully understand. Nature did not make anything. God created us.
Speaker 2: God created our world. There was an intelligence there. And
Speaker 2: when God created the world, they want to say, well,
Speaker 2: this is much more perfect than the DNA that we
Speaker 2: have right now. Well, God created the world. He pronounced
Speaker 2: it very very good. What that means is that it
Speaker 2: was perfect. God has now changed the world twice. We're
Speaker 2: now in the third revision. We've had the fall as
Speaker 2: well as the flood, and in both of those he
Speaker 2: cursed us. And so what we're seeing now is not
Speaker 2: what he originally created, but he is going to restore that.
Speaker 2: Scientists at the Medical Research Council's Lab of Molecular Biology
Speaker 2: say they've engineered a bacteria whose genetic code is more
Speaker 2: efficient than any other life form on Earth. They call
Speaker 2: it Sen fifty seven. They could call it meaning synthesis,
Speaker 2: but they're going to break it down. That's why end
Speaker 2: they could just call it original sin. Maybe there's a
Speaker 2: bioengineered strain of E. Coli. Yeah, and they's great. That's
Speaker 2: the first thing they want to do is create more E. Coli.
Speaker 2: That's that's your scientists for you today. They say it
Speaker 2: uses seven less codons than the than all life on Earth.
Speaker 2: A codon, put simply, is a three letter sequence that
Speaker 2: is found in DNA and RNA, which delivers instructions for
Speaker 2: amino acids, a fundamental building block of life. All of
Speaker 2: this is a code. All of it is design. And
Speaker 2: you know, it's amazing when they look at this. I
Speaker 2: grew up where biology it was all about skeletons. It
Speaker 2: was all about you know, comparative anatomy was Oh, look,
Speaker 2: there's the similarity between different skeletons. That means that evolved
Speaker 2: one from the other. It's like, now you don't have
Speaker 2: any transitional forms. Now they look at this and they
Speaker 2: look at DNA, and what utter fools they have made
Speaker 2: of themselves to think that this is a complex computer
Speaker 2: code that has error correction all the rest of the stuff.
Speaker 2: But it just happened.
Speaker 8: They say that it's just kind of appeared.
Speaker 2: One. Yeah, all life on Earth uses sixty four codons,
Speaker 2: and they've been able to do this Ecoli bacteria with
Speaker 2: fewer ones. So they say it's better and more efficient.
Speaker 2: When you look at this and you look at some
Speaker 2: common features between different animals, you might say. Another way
Speaker 2: that you might look at that is to say it
Speaker 2: looks like they've got a common designer. But they won't
Speaker 2: say that. And of course this is not just animals,
Speaker 2: but it's also plants that have this DNA coding in it.
Speaker 2: They realize, they said, that evolution had not resulted in
Speaker 2: perfect efficiency. Since some of the codons were clearly redundant,
Speaker 2: was there room to trim some thing? So in twenty ten,
Speaker 2: a team of twenty four researchers detailed the steps to
Speaker 2: take to create the world's first synthetic bacteria cell, and
Speaker 2: it took them fifteen years. Then in twenty nineteen, genetic
Speaker 2: researchers in Cambridge University reworked an E. Coli strain down
Speaker 2: to sixty one codons, showing they could do it with
Speaker 2: less than the sixty four. But now they've taken it
Speaker 2: even further to make send fifty seven. The researchers went
Speaker 2: through the painstaking process say this, of altering over one
Speaker 2: hundred and one thousand lines of genetic code, first in
Speaker 2: theory and then in practice. Yeah, they want you to
Speaker 2: believe if you stopped to think about it, one hundred
Speaker 2: and one thousand lines of code, if you saw a
Speaker 2: computer program like that, would your first instinct be, well,
Speaker 2: I think that just happened by accident, or would you
Speaker 2: say somebody wrote that this is I mean, these people
Speaker 2: are utter fools to try to push this, and don't
Speaker 2: let them fool you to believe that one hundred one
Speaker 2: thousand lines of code could just happen spontaneously and accidentally.
Speaker 7: And also so they don't know enough about this to
Speaker 7: say that they can improve it authoritatively, Like for a
Speaker 7: long time you mentioned chunk DNA of half of it.
Speaker 7: We don't know what it does, so it's junk. It
Speaker 7: doesn't do anything. And then they are slowly realizing more
Speaker 7: and more that no, the junk DNA is extremely important.
Speaker 7: If they had trimmed the fat quote unquote with DNA,
Speaker 7: would they have gotten rid of the junk DNA and
Speaker 7: created some cancer prone abomination.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's exactly right. Ye who knows what they're going
Speaker 2: to create.
Speaker 8: Knights of the Storm has a good comminators. They used
Speaker 8: to talk about the missing link between the various humanoid species.
Speaker 8: The fact is there is no link between any type
Speaker 8: of species.
Speaker 2: That's right, that's right.
Speaker 8: They continually would talk about, Oh, look there's Lucy, there's
Speaker 8: piltdown man, there's this, there's that, and all of them
Speaker 8: are continuous.
Speaker 2: When you look at DNA, it's a very complicated code
Speaker 2: which tells you that it was created by intelligence. And
Speaker 2: when you look at it's not just intelligence that we
Speaker 2: see there, but it's also things like irreducible complexity if
Speaker 2: you look at different animals. And this is what I
Speaker 2: always enjoyed with the answers and genesis curriculum. Folks, have
Speaker 2: you got kids, grandkids, You need to get that stuff
Speaker 2: and talk to them about it, because, as I said,
Speaker 2: it was as dull as paint drying for them to
Speaker 2: point to skeletons and stuff. That's not the biology that
Speaker 2: is the reality of life. The reality is that if
Speaker 2: you start to look at these animals as irreducibly complex,
Speaker 2: you start to see the true functionality that's built into them.
Speaker 2: And it truly is a wonder if you look at
Speaker 2: the reality of what's there instead of looking at the
Speaker 2: dead skeletons. If you look at, for example, the woodpecker
Speaker 2: and the things that make it unique. It's got a
Speaker 2: beak that's very hard, and it has shock absorbers for
Speaker 2: its brain because it's going to beat its beak against
Speaker 2: the tree. It's got feet that allow it to hook
Speaker 2: on vertically while it's doing all of this stuff. And
Speaker 2: then once it drills a hole, it's got a very long,
Speaker 2: sticky tongue to go through and to get the insects
Speaker 2: out of there. If you take away any one of
Speaker 2: those aspects, you've now got an animal that doesn't work.
Speaker 2: So it's not only designed at the lowest level of DNA,
Speaker 2: but that DNA creates a unique set of features that
Speaker 2: creates a unique functional animal like a woodpecker. Same thing
Speaker 2: you see with a giraffe, for example. If you stop
Speaker 2: and think about the giraffe as high as its head
Speaker 2: is and the hydraulics involved in all of this. Once
Speaker 2: a giraffe bends down to try to get a drink
Speaker 2: of water, for example, all that blood is going to
Speaker 2: rush to its brain. But there is a special device
Speaker 2: that only the giraffe has that will stop that from
Speaker 2: causing it to black out from the rush brain of
Speaker 2: blood coming to its brain. You see these types of
Speaker 2: things all through nature, and each and every creature is
Speaker 2: uniquely designed, irreducibly complex. So there's so many things in
Speaker 2: nature that God has created that show his handiwork and
Speaker 2: showed the design that's there. But these people say, well,
Speaker 2: we definitely went through these periods where we were like, well,
Speaker 2: will this be a dead end or will we see
Speaker 2: this through? They said, you can start to exploring what
Speaker 2: will life tolerate again, thinking that life and nature are
Speaker 2: these things out there that have intelligence and the ability
Speaker 2: to design things. And they said, we found out that
Speaker 2: life still works well in the beginning, it wasn't life.
Speaker 2: But in the beginning it was logos, right, And when
Speaker 2: we look at logos, logos, that actual word talks about intelligence.
Speaker 2: And if you look at the Greek word, it's also structure.
Speaker 2: It's things like word and reason and rationale and logic
Speaker 2: and argument. All those were involved there because that's what
Speaker 2: embodied what God was. In the beginning, there was logos,
Speaker 2: and logos was with God, and logos was God. That's
Speaker 2: what the Bible teaches us. And Logos was life. Christ
Speaker 2: was life, and the light of man. This is these
Speaker 2: people who are operating in darkness. Well, Brian Shall Hobby
Speaker 2: has something along the same lines. He says, what is
Speaker 2: the difference between life and lifeless? Has new technology actually
Speaker 2: improved our lives? And in it he talks about First
Speaker 2: Corinthians and the example that is there, And if you
Speaker 2: look at that article, as we can pull that up,
Speaker 2: he's got a picture of people playing musical instruments. Because
Speaker 2: that's the analogy that Paul uses when he writes to
Speaker 2: the Corinthians. Even in the case of lifeless things, he says,
Speaker 2: that makes sounds such as a flute or a harp,
Speaker 2: they have anyone, how will anyone know what tune is
Speaker 2: being played unless there's a distinction in the notes. In
Speaker 2: other words, these musical instruments are lifeless things. The flute
Speaker 2: has no life in it, the heart has no life
Speaker 2: in it. But it's the person who has lifefe who
Speaker 2: makes these things come to life. And that is the
Speaker 2: analogy for artificial intelligences. It does not have any life
Speaker 2: in it. It is a fake intelligence. It's being animated
Speaker 2: by either actual Indians. It's going to be used by
Speaker 2: the governments and the technocrats are going to be behind
Speaker 2: this to control you. And what they're trying to do
Speaker 2: folks right now is they're trying to create a mythology
Speaker 2: that these machines are intelligent, that they're self aware, that
Speaker 2: they're a new form of life, that they are evolving,
Speaker 2: and all the rest of this stuff, because they don't
Speaker 2: want you to see the man behind the curtain pulling
Speaker 2: the levers like the Wizard of Oz. And so our job,
Speaker 2: your job as well as mine, is to pull back
Speaker 2: that curtain and to show these people are moving the
Speaker 2: levers so we do not get deceived by what This
Speaker 2: is a big part of this, as Brainshaw Hoby points out,
Speaker 2: this worldview that they're selling you of AI predicated on
Speaker 2: this long evolutionary worldview that they've been putting out. He said,
Speaker 2: The predominant belief in Western culture that is fueling this
Speaker 2: current generative AI spending frenzy and creating perhaps the largest
Speaker 2: financial budget of modern times is the belief in Darwinian evolution.
Speaker 2: You know, maybe what we should do is instead of
Speaker 2: maybe the way we ought to refer to this AI,
Speaker 2: since it's a bubble, maybe we ought to call it
Speaker 2: the bubble of Babel, because it is very much like
Speaker 2: the Tower of Babel. It is something that first of all,
Speaker 2: allows people of different languages to be able to communicate
Speaker 2: more effectively with each other, which is what really was
Speaker 2: going on with the Tower of Babel. And it also
Speaker 2: is mankind trying to play God, trying to play God
Speaker 2: saying that we're going to create this new superintelligence and
Speaker 2: all the rest of this stuff. So, as he points out,
Speaker 2: Darwinism has conditioned the generals their life today in Western
Speaker 2: culture to believe that electronic technology is constantly evolving and
Speaker 2: improving life and improving the world. Is that really what
Speaker 2: is happening in your life? So it's higher forms of
Speaker 2: human beings have not evolved in the real world, in
Speaker 2: spite of the rapid advancement of electronic technology of the
Speaker 2: last couple of centuries. Superhumans only exist in fantasy, such
Speaker 2: as the Zionists controlled Marvel Studios and their blockbuster movies
Speaker 2: in the past couple of decades, portraying superhumans as they
Speaker 2: condition their audience to accept eugenics and Darwinism through propaganda entertainment.
Speaker 2: Of course, there's a lot of different bad subtexts that
Speaker 2: were in the Marvel movies, aren't there. I mean, when
Speaker 2: you look at X men and stuff that is like,
Speaker 2: you know, well, we are super We're better than everybody else.
Speaker 2: And there was this LGBT analogy that they were pretty
Speaker 2: obviously trying to stick in there.
Speaker 8: I've always found it a little bit silly because they'll
Speaker 8: look at it like, oh, well, this is an example
Speaker 8: for this, Like what's kind of a bad example. And
Speaker 8: you've got a kid that might turn into a nuclear
Speaker 8: bomb at any moment, you know, maybe you need to
Speaker 8: reset valuate that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's all predicated on this idea that we're going
Speaker 2: to evolve. That's where these superhero supposedly come from. And
Speaker 2: of course, he points out Marvel studios. If you remember,
Speaker 2: partnered with Pfiser and Trump to distribute the Pfiser COVID
Speaker 2: shots during COVID, especially in Israel, and as I point
Speaker 2: out many times, Netanyahu hates his own people. He partnered
Speaker 2: with Pfiser and said, we will get collect data and
Speaker 2: use the Israelis that he was governing, will use them
Speaker 2: as labrats if you put us at the front of
Speaker 2: the list and give us the shot first. I mean
Speaker 2: he offered up his own people. Think about that as labrats.
Speaker 2: No wonder that he has no problem pushing genocide against
Speaker 2: other people. So he points out Darwinism has developed into
Speaker 2: the belief system of transhumanism, because of course it's just
Speaker 2: the next evolutionary step to merge with machines and the singularity, right,
Speaker 2: and that is what's fundamentally behind it. And you need
Speaker 2: to stop and pull back and think about the worldviews
Speaker 2: that are being sold to you through things like entertainment.
Speaker 2: You know, you can go back and look at Star
Speaker 2: Wars and you can see a lot of Buddhism that
Speaker 2: is involved in that, you know, becoming one with a
Speaker 2: force and all the rest of that stuff that so
Speaker 2: many different philosophical and religious elements in that that you
Speaker 2: need to be able to identify instead of just naively
Speaker 2: and passively consuming entertainment. It's fine to to, you know,
Speaker 2: look at it as a superficial level, but especially if
Speaker 2: you have children, you need to address some of the
Speaker 2: underlying things that are affecting the way that they view
Speaker 2: the world, and you need to address those things specifically.
Speaker 2: And so we have had Hollywood selling us the idea
Speaker 2: of transhumanism and the singularity. Of course they've been selling
Speaker 2: us this whole idea of UFOs and all the which
Speaker 2: is also something else that has grown out of this
Speaker 2: Darwinian evolutionary mindset. The concept of transhumanism, belief that biological
Speaker 2: humans can integrate with electronic computers to create a new
Speaker 2: quote unquote species, was introduced by the World Economic Forum
Speaker 2: around twenty sixteen as part of their Fourth Industrial Revolution,
Speaker 2: and the term transhumanism, I think was actually coined by
Speaker 2: Julian Huxley, brother of Oldest Huxley. This brave new garbage
Speaker 2: that they've been trying to sell us. And whenever I
Speaker 2: look at their Fourth Industrial Revolution, the way Klaus Schwab
Speaker 2: would say, it'd always be the forced Industrial Revolution, Like
Speaker 2: you would say.
Speaker 8: It whether you like it or not.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And so this is what they say in their video.
Speaker 2: I didn't get the video because it's about eleven minutes long,
Speaker 2: but about four and a half minutes into it, they
Speaker 2: say design is critical today because it is the first
Speaker 2: signal of human intention. Well, design is not just humans
Speaker 2: at design. Of course, God designs as well. The whole
Speaker 2: point of recognizing intelligent design is to recognize that something
Speaker 2: was done intentionally. You know, when you look at a car,
Speaker 2: you know that somebody intentionally had an intention and deliberately
Speaker 2: made that car. And so design is when you see
Speaker 2: design when you can understand that there is intention and
Speaker 2: not just random factors that have come together for something.
Speaker 2: That's the cue.
Speaker 7: Yeah, I'm reminded of the whole thing with SETI with
Speaker 7: I looking for intelligent life, and they found just a
Speaker 7: single repeating frequency, and I believe they later found out
Speaker 7: that was due to some astrological thing of some sorts.
Speaker 7: Are yeah, pulsing at a steady rate. But it's like, oh, look,
Speaker 7: because it's on a set timer, that must mean that
Speaker 7: it had a creator bhind it. And yet they will
Speaker 7: look at all this and say, oh, no, it's just random.
Speaker 2: Yeah, because it had this fixed period in terms of
Speaker 2: the signal. That was basically what Equasar was was this
Speaker 2: rotating rock that had a polarized tips that were rotating,
Speaker 2: and because that rotation, it was sending out electromagnetic signal.
Speaker 2: And when they saw a repeating, consistent pattern of a
Speaker 2: signal as simple as that was, they said, oh, this
Speaker 2: is a sign of life. They're trying to communicate with us.
Speaker 2: And yet they at the same time, they would ignore
Speaker 2: what was going on with their own DNA. You know,
Speaker 2: you look at the complicated code in your DNA, and
Speaker 2: they're still doing it. Even to this day, they still
Speaker 2: ignore that, and they're still looking for some kind of
Speaker 2: extraterrestrial intelligence that is not really very intelligent.
Speaker 8: Just this utter refusal, just no, there can't be a god.
Speaker 22: I can't anything anything other than that, right, it's too
Speaker 22: horrifying to contemplate for them, the fact that there's something
Speaker 22: that would always be above them, something that you know,
Speaker 22: the perfect being, something that is perfectly intelligent, per and
Speaker 22: just they want to be the smartest person they or
Speaker 22: at least the potential to become the smartest person, Like well,
Speaker 22: maybe even if we find aliens, they might be smarter
Speaker 22: than us now, but I can eventually become as smart
Speaker 22: as them.
Speaker 8: With God, that's out the window. There's no chance of
Speaker 8: that ever.
Speaker 2: Half un if ever there was a time when there
Speaker 2: was no thing, there would still be nothing. But Krick
Speaker 2: and Watson discovered DNA, said well, we can see the
Speaker 2: design here. So they weren't so stupid and rebellious that
Speaker 2: they would ignore that. So they talked about pan Spermi. Oh,
Speaker 2: there's some aliens or something that went throughout the universe
Speaker 2: creating life. It's like, you know, that would be called
Speaker 2: God if that was really true, and it would have
Speaker 2: to be self existent.
Speaker 7: They're desperate for there to be aliens, like the whole
Speaker 7: SETI thing. Looking at a single repeating pulse as sign
Speaker 7: of intelligence is just as ridiculous as looking at this
Speaker 7: complicated code. Well not quite as ridiculous, but almost as
Speaker 7: ridiculous as looking at this complicated code and saying, oh,
Speaker 7: it's just random. It's they have to have the aliens
Speaker 7: and not God, no matter how ridiculous the logic jumps
Speaker 7: that are required for that.
Speaker 8: That's right, and still it only moves the problem back
Speaker 8: one step. Like even if you were to find out, oh,
Speaker 8: we were created by aliens. Where did those aliens come from?
Speaker 6: Yes?
Speaker 8: Are there more aliens and then more aliens?
Speaker 2: Well, Brian shaw Hobby takes it in an interesting direction.
Speaker 2: He says, the descendence of Noah must have had too
Speaker 2: much knowledge of the evil world system and whatever technology
Speaker 2: they use before it was destroyed by God in the flood.
Speaker 2: So once more God had to intervene to prevent Satan
Speaker 2: from taking over the world. As you divide the world
Speaker 2: up into smaller ethnic and language groups and scattered them
Speaker 2: across the world, well that's what is now being reversed
Speaker 2: by AI. Think of the knowledge that was lost at
Speaker 2: the Tower of Babbel, which was the last time the
Speaker 2: world had a singular world government and a singular world language.
Speaker 2: People before the flood lived to be almost one thousand
Speaker 2: years old. In the knowledge and wisdom that they would
Speaker 2: have passed on from generation generation is truly unfathomable today. Yeah,
Speaker 2: when you stop and think about it, if you didn't
Speaker 2: have diminished physical and mental capabilities that come with age,
Speaker 2: think about how intelligent I mean we've talked about this
Speaker 2: with octopus for example. You know the fact that they
Speaker 2: only live like what three years or something? But look
Speaker 2: at how incredibly smart they are. They could be They
Speaker 2: could be a real threat with a longer lifespan. Well,
Speaker 2: that certainly is true of humans, isn't it.
Speaker 8: Yea, if we had an octopus that lived to be
Speaker 8: eighty years old, they might be a problem. You couldn't
Speaker 8: contain it no matter what you did.
Speaker 2: So long and thanks for all the fish, right, yeah,
Speaker 2: he writes, It's highly unlikely that these people needed any
Speaker 2: of the electronic technological crutches that we use today, with
Speaker 2: the thought of recording any of their communication even have
Speaker 2: been entered into their minds, he said, I wonder or
Speaker 2: did they have such perfect photographic memories so that knowledge
Speaker 2: and wisdom would pass down from generation and generation, increasing
Speaker 2: human power and ingenuity with each generation, without the use
Speaker 2: of modern technological crutches that we have today. I mean,
Speaker 2: stop and think somebody like Einstein or somebody like Newton.
Speaker 2: Imagine if they live to be a thousand years old,
Speaker 2: what they could have put together. It truly is amazing.
Speaker 2: But it also makes me think when he puts it
Speaker 2: this way with brianchall, how he does you know, did
Speaker 2: they need to have anything any crutches to remember this stuff? Right?
Speaker 2: We congratulate ourselves because we've created computers and other things
Speaker 2: like that as crutches. It makes me think of the
Speaker 2: Christopher Nolan movie Memento, right where you get this guy
Speaker 2: who's lost his ability to create new memories, and so
Speaker 2: as things are going on, he's leaving notes everywhere for
Speaker 2: his later self to come back and discover, and so
Speaker 2: the post it's kind of become his memory. That's really
Speaker 2: kind of what we're doing with computers now, isn't it.
Speaker 8: Yeah, we've replaced our own ability to even think and reason,
Speaker 8: not just the ability to form new memories, but everything
Speaker 8: turning it over. Just hey, I've mentioned this before, but
Speaker 8: on Twitter now anytime I look at anything, there's someone
Speaker 8: in the comments at Groc. What does this mean at Groc?
Speaker 8: Summarize this for me at Grock? Is this real? Are
Speaker 8: you guys just fully happy to turn it.
Speaker 2: To become the arbiter of what is true or not?
Speaker 2: I mean, like I said, as well, you know, we've
Speaker 2: had situations. I've seen a couple of different videos that
Speaker 2: have been put up where somebody says, look at this,
Speaker 2: I went through with AI and I got it to
Speaker 2: admit such and such, and some of them are to
Speaker 2: admit that there really is a god or whatever. It's like,
Speaker 2: is that you're you're going to hang your hat on
Speaker 2: what AI said.
Speaker 8: Yeah, there's also just the fact that AI wants to
Speaker 8: give you the answers that you want. That does eventually
Speaker 8: it will kind of suss out and figure out the
Speaker 8: way you're trying to push it, and it will even
Speaker 8: if to backpedal or you know, go back on what
Speaker 8: it said, it will start going back and doing that
Speaker 8: because it wants to keep you utilizing the system.
Speaker 2: We just have to keep in mind that this is
Speaker 2: not intelligence. It's illusion. That's what the eye stands for.
Speaker 2: It's artificial illusion, and you know, you can enjoy it
Speaker 2: and you can use it for entertainment, just like people
Speaker 2: look at David Copperfield who says he's going to make
Speaker 2: the statue of liberty disappear. Well, he didn't make the
Speaker 2: statue of liberty disappear. It appeared to disappear for the
Speaker 2: people who were standing in a particular spot. But it
Speaker 2: was an illusion. And so you know, we can we
Speaker 2: can be entertained, we can be fascinated by illusions. You
Speaker 2: know how in the world they do that. We can
Speaker 2: do the same thing with Ai. We can say, how
Speaker 2: in the world could it put this kind of stuff together,
Speaker 2: and just don't let it become a reference source for
Speaker 2: you and don't fall into the idea that this thing
Speaker 2: is real. Understand there is a man behind the curtain,
Speaker 2: and that man is trying to steal everything in your
Speaker 2: life from you and from your descendants, and he's trying
Speaker 2: to imprison and kill you. That's the way to properly
Speaker 2: understand this, that the Wizard of Oz is truly evil
Speaker 2: and the Wizard of Ai. And I think also the
Speaker 2: fact that you know, when we look at the original
Speaker 2: Tower of Babbel, it stopped when God changed the languages here.
Speaker 2: But I think what we're going to have with this bubble,
Speaker 2: the bubble of Babel, I think that's going to burst.
Speaker 2: That's the way this thing is going to come down,
Speaker 2: and it's going to be financial and in many other regards.
Speaker 2: It's going to have massive implications for us. I think
Speaker 2: when this artificial bubble that they have built collapses. Brian
Speaker 2: schaw Harby says, these people have failed to acknowledge that
Speaker 2: it was their master who corrupted the world from the perfect,
Speaker 2: original design and the original intention of the Creator. Yeah,
Speaker 2: they are serving the Master who has been the enemy
Speaker 2: of humans from the Garden of beaten On. In opposition
Speaker 2: to modern teaching on Darwinism and technology that promotes things
Speaker 2: like eugenics and transhumanism, the teaching of the Bible clearly
Speaker 2: shows that the physical world is wearing out and will
Speaker 2: soon be destroyed by fire and then replaced. In the beginning,
Speaker 2: as hebrews, a Lord, you laid the foundation of the earth.
Speaker 2: The heavens are the work of your hands. They will perish,
Speaker 2: but you will remain. They will all wear out like
Speaker 2: a garment. You will roll them up like a robe.
Speaker 2: Like a garment. They will be changed, but you remain
Speaker 2: the same, and your ears will never end. The day
Speaker 2: of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens
Speaker 2: will disappear with a roar, and the elements will be
Speaker 2: destroyed by fire. That's what we need to keep in mind.
Speaker 2: The concepts of transhumanism in the Fourth Industrial Revolution presented
Speaker 2: by the World Economic Forum almost ten years ago. There's
Speaker 2: been a notable chain and the presentation of transhumanism since
Speaker 2: the introduction of cht GPT. We now have software that
Speaker 2: is very, very energy hungry and not sustainable quite frankly,
Speaker 2: unless they take everything from us. And they're in the
Speaker 2: process of doing that. Your electricity rates and are soaring everywhere.
Speaker 2: This is actually AI and the data centers are becoming
Speaker 2: a bigger threat to your ability to have electricity and
Speaker 2: power than actually the climate mcguffin was. It's rolling out
Speaker 2: much faster with that because they want it for control.
Speaker 2: There's now widespread belief amongst the public that a computer
Speaker 2: powered by AI can completely replace man, which means that
Speaker 2: they no longer even need a transhuman you know. Just
Speaker 2: think about this. The fear of our AI takeover folks
Speaker 2: is based on the lie of evolution. It's based on
Speaker 2: the lie of man becoming God. This is why you
Speaker 2: don't need to fear what is happening, because it's all
Speaker 2: a lie. And so just understand where your future lies.
Speaker 2: It does not God is the one who's going to
Speaker 2: control the future. And all of these dire predictions about
Speaker 2: taking your jobs and taking everything away from you or
Speaker 2: AI that is going to be doing this, or that
Speaker 2: it's really going to be the humans behind it. We
Speaker 2: need to be aware of the humans and how they're
Speaker 2: going to use this. But it's not going to be
Speaker 2: ai AI will be their artificial illusion for tyranny. The
Speaker 2: idea that human like robots can now replace humans is
Speaker 2: a common theme in both corporate and alternative media these days.
Speaker 2: Brian Schall Hobby says, I've tried my best for the
Speaker 2: past few years to show how fake this belief is.
Speaker 2: But the propaganda and the deception of two hundred years
Speaker 2: of Darwinian academics has almost completely blinded the eyes of
Speaker 2: the current generations alive today on planet Earth. As I
Speaker 2: said before, it's also that Darwinism also includes the UFO
Speaker 2: illusion and Project Bluebeam or whatever they're going to do
Speaker 2: with that. Communications and language or characteristics of life that's
Speaker 2: created by God. Lifeless things created by man need human
Speaker 2: intervention for them to have any meaning at all, just
Speaker 2: like a musical instrument that by themselves does not have
Speaker 2: the power or the ability to communicate or to make music.
Speaker 2: And again that quote that I read you before, saying
Speaker 2: that a lifeless thing like a flute or a harp
Speaker 2: needs somebody to breathe life into it. He says, So
Speaker 2: unless you speak intelligent, intelligible words with your tongue, how
Speaker 2: will anyone know what you're saying? You'll just be speaking
Speaker 2: into the air like an AI chatbot. That's hallucinating. When
Speaker 2: one considers the truth that are being written here, it's
Speaker 2: very easy to see that people's false beliefs and AI
Speaker 2: and robots replacing humans would be the same as if
Speaker 2: people started worshiping musical instruments attributing consciousness to those instruments
Speaker 2: if they were playing themselves. Can a player piano replicate
Speaker 2: humans so that human musicians are no longer needed to
Speaker 2: create music? You know? We get to that in some
Speaker 2: regard with MIDI, which is the way I do the
Speaker 2: music that I do. There's recorded instruments and if you
Speaker 2: look at the MIDI controllers, that actually looks like the
Speaker 2: piano role that you have on a player piano. But
Speaker 2: it's telling the instrument how to play and what to
Speaker 2: play and the timing that it's going to play. But
Speaker 2: still there has to be a human that's going to
Speaker 2: create the instrument and a human that's going to program it.
Speaker 7: I saw something of a guy talking about how AI
Speaker 7: is going to kill creativity, and the quote he ad was,
Speaker 7: you can give AI fifty one hundred years of blues
Speaker 7: and never get rock and roll. It's as more and
Speaker 7: more of more and more people offload their thinking and
Speaker 7: creative processes to this stuff. Those talents are going to
Speaker 7: become rarer and rarer and go away. But this thing
Speaker 7: isn't really creative. It isn't Yeah, it's not truly creating
Speaker 7: the music.
Speaker 2: It's imitating.
Speaker 7: It's altering and parodying what already exists.
Speaker 2: It's like Disney, it's cannibalizing the creative efforts of people
Speaker 2: in the past. I do have to say though, that
Speaker 2: you know, sometimes you can use some of these elements
Speaker 2: and computers or artificial intelligence. Sometimes it can be used
Speaker 2: in a different way, in a creative way. And I
Speaker 2: would say, you know, when we do it with music,
Speaker 2: there's programs out there like Suno where you just give
Speaker 2: it a prompt and you say, give me something in
Speaker 2: this particular style with these instruments, and I'll just go
Speaker 2: through and create some derivative piece of work, which usually
Speaker 2: is not very good. But the other thing that you
Speaker 2: can do with it is you can and not so
Speaker 2: much Ai. I was talking about Midi. That really wasn't Ai.
Speaker 2: But now they have brought AI in to be able
Speaker 2: to actually sing words. But you still program it, you know,
Speaker 2: which is still still your lyrics. It's still you doing
Speaker 2: the midi, but now for the first time, rather than
Speaker 2: having a large choir that somebody has recorded that's singing
Speaker 2: or or this, you know, some other syllable and not
Speaker 2: really singing anything of any intelligence, now you can get
Speaker 2: it to actually do the lyrics. And I've been playing
Speaker 2: around with that, and there is a tremendous amount. When
Speaker 2: you look at that, you realize just how much is
Speaker 2: done effortlessly by somebody who can sing. If you can't sing,
Speaker 2: then it becomes even more difficult than learning to sing
Speaker 2: in many cases, because you wind up with strange pronunciation
Speaker 2: and other things like that, and you have to do workarounds.
Speaker 2: And that's the key. These programs as they stand right
Speaker 2: now give you the ability to go in and to
Speaker 2: change it and find detail. So you give it the
Speaker 2: words and it pronounces the words, and then when it
Speaker 2: gets the pronunciation wrong or it gets the inflection wrong,
Speaker 2: you go in and micro manage that. So it can
Speaker 2: be a lot of work, but it can also give
Speaker 2: you access to a creative process that you couldn't have
Speaker 2: if you couldn't sing, or if you were somebody who
Speaker 2: wanted to put together a large ensemble, but you couldn't
Speaker 2: afford to hire the musicians to do it. And now
Speaker 2: you can do that with a great deal of work
Speaker 2: on your own. But anyway, he said, to be just
Speaker 2: as foolish to think that, you know, when we look
Speaker 2: at AI and we think that it's actually thinking, it
Speaker 2: would just be be just as foolish as thinking that
Speaker 2: the instruments are playing themselves. They don't play themselves, and
Speaker 2: yet we are looking at that. He goes on to
Speaker 2: say that when you look at lifeless, the word that
Speaker 2: was used there in Greek was essentially the word for
Speaker 2: soul as life, but it has an A in front
Speaker 2: of it, right, just like we see atheist is somebody
Speaker 2: who denies that there's a guy to put the a
Speaker 2: in front of it, right, And so it was a
Speaker 2: word that had an A in front of soul to
Speaker 2: deny that it had a soul, that it had life.
Speaker 2: And he said, uh, these lifeless things a man made
Speaker 2: instruments or tech tools that have no soul. And that's
Speaker 2: exactly what AI large language models are.
Speaker 7: Yah yuess, you could say that's the A and AI.
Speaker 7: It's against intelligence, it's anti intelligence.
Speaker 2: That's right. Yeah, it's just like atheistic. It is ah intelligence,
Speaker 2: lifeless without a soul by itself. Even if it contained
Speaker 2: all of the digitized information in the world, it can
Speaker 2: do nothing. It needs masters, It needs the humans who
Speaker 2: create it and operate it in order for the program
Speaker 2: to be useful. And that's that's the real issue. The
Speaker 2: evil masters, the wizards of Ohs that are pulling the
Speaker 2: string is behind the curtain. That's what needs to be exposed.
Speaker 2: We need to realize what this is. We don't even
Speaker 2: know how it works. We need to know who is
Speaker 2: working it. That's the key thing. People wrongly ascribe life
Speaker 2: and consciousness to AI. So, as he points out again
Speaker 2: going back to the idea of soul, I've said many
Speaker 2: times when we look at psychology, right, uh, these are
Speaker 2: atheists who refer to the soul and they study it.
Speaker 2: You know, psychology is literally the study of the soul.
Speaker 2: Except these are people who deny that you have a soul.
Speaker 2: And he said Western culture completely ignores the existence of souls.
Speaker 2: They reduce man to a physical entity that operates like
Speaker 2: a computer, like how technology works. And just like you
Speaker 2: see that, especially in bef Skinner's work, he believes that
Speaker 2: people are souls they're not committed, they're not creating the
Speaker 2: image of God, and he can control them like he
Speaker 2: does a machine. And that's what his behavioral psycholog is
Speaker 2: ultimately about. It's about controlling people like he would control
Speaker 2: a machine. And that's what's so dehumanizing about it. And
Speaker 2: that's why he calls his book Beyond Freedom and Dignity.
Speaker 2: You can you know, you can take those things away
Speaker 2: from people, but you can't separate them. Life is now
Speaker 2: defined by ease and comfort, which is mistakenly interpretated as wealth.
Speaker 2: This is this false belief, says Brian. That is not
Speaker 2: only the false belief that technology is making our lives better,
Speaker 2: but the ignorance of the masses as to what life
Speaker 2: actually is that is empowering the technocrasts today as they
Speaker 2: spend trillions on AI and waste our natural resources to
Speaker 2: make us poor, to make us their servants. That's why
Speaker 2: I say, you know, when Elon Musk talks about the
Speaker 2: fact that will you have meaning in your life if
Speaker 2: you don't have a job, they really don't understand what
Speaker 2: life is, and they understand what gives meaning to life
Speaker 2: is that many times, Counting used to always talk about
Speaker 2: the politics of meaning you know, politics gave meaning to her,
Speaker 2: and we don't need to envy those people, and we
Speaker 2: don't need to emulate them either. We should transcend them.
Speaker 2: And the way that we do that is with God
Speaker 2: and our connection to God. Technology is lifeless. It doesn't
Speaker 2: produce anything. You can only be powered by those who
Speaker 2: have life and a soul. Even things like genetic engineering.
Speaker 2: He said, if you look at GMO fruits and vegetables,
Speaker 2: they only alter a plant within its kind. Genetic engineering technology,
Speaker 2: for example, has never taken a seed from one specie
Speaker 2: and modify it to evolve into a completely different specie.
Speaker 2: That's what they're trying to hint that they're doing.
Speaker 8: It truly is amazing, but yeah, and again that's the
Speaker 8: essence of evolution. They are like, oh, we started as
Speaker 8: a single cell thingy and now we're here and that's
Speaker 8: where everything came from. And it is just the most
Speaker 8: absurd theory. There's not a single instance of it being proven,
Speaker 8: being shown. There's not a single missing link a bridge
Speaker 8: between two things like oh, look it's changing from this
Speaker 8: to the other thing.
Speaker 2: I got to the point where I used to like
Speaker 2: National Geographic they had great nature photography, but the problem
Speaker 2: was that they would just hammer you over and over
Speaker 2: and over and over again with this evolutionary mindset, and
Speaker 2: it's like it's just absurd, and I'm tired of hearing it.
Speaker 7: You know.
Speaker 2: It was like a school hammering down transgender pronoun.
Speaker 8: And they continually get away with this because they'll conflate
Speaker 8: natural selection, you know, they'll call it micro evolution, where
Speaker 8: something has within its own genetics a vast array of
Speaker 8: different things that it can potentially alter itself slightly. It
Speaker 8: selects for you know, oh, these you know finches over
Speaker 8: here have a different beak because they eat snails and
Speaker 8: they have to have a stronger beak to crack through
Speaker 8: the shell versus these finches over there that don't do that.
Speaker 8: But the finch is still a finch. It's not even
Speaker 8: changing from a finch into a sparrow or a hawk.
Speaker 8: It's still an exactly exact same type of bird.
Speaker 2: They play games of their definition too, the case of
Speaker 2: the I don't know finches maybe at the Grand Canyon,
Speaker 2: and they said, well, our definition of a specie is
Speaker 2: something that will mate with each other. And so we
Speaker 2: got these two different populations of finches on the Grand
Speaker 2: Canyon that have not come in contact with each other
Speaker 2: and so they're mating. Songs have changed slightly to the
Speaker 2: extent that one group will not mate with the other group.
Speaker 2: Therefore they have evolved into another specie by definition. So see,
Speaker 2: there we have evolution and it's absolute nonsense. I mean,
Speaker 2: it's still physically identified identical to each other.
Speaker 8: And it's just because, like you said, they play these
Speaker 8: definitional games where again it's natural selection, but they'll call
Speaker 8: it something like microevolution. That still joining the idea. Well,
Speaker 8: if this is actually evolution, and then if it's happening,
Speaker 8: that means macro can happen. But it's a completely different thing.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's molecules, man, it's completely different than microadaptation.
Speaker 6: Yeah.
Speaker 7: The key difference is there's not new information being added.
Speaker 8: It's information being lost.
Speaker 7: Yeah, it's information that was already there or information that's
Speaker 7: discarded because it was no longer useful. Like fish that
Speaker 7: go blind because they are generations growing up in a
Speaker 7: cave that doesn't have any light, so they're wasting calories
Speaker 7: on eyes that they can't use. So after a while
Speaker 7: they stop having eyes with the children because the ones
Speaker 7: that didn't have eyes reproduce more so that's just information
Speaker 7: being subtracted to better fit the environment that they're in.
Speaker 7: It's not new information. The fish isn't growing legs, it's
Speaker 7: getting rid of its eyes.
Speaker 2: Yes, right. And it's like you hear them talk all
Speaker 2: the time about superbugs evolving in response to some kind
Speaker 2: of a poison. Well, that is not a new bug
Speaker 2: that is evolving. What's happened is that some of them
Speaker 2: have you know, there's variation within this population and some
Speaker 2: of them, just as we see when we have vaccine
Speaker 2: poisons injected into us, we see that it affects some people
Speaker 2: differently than it affects others. Some people has no effect
Speaker 2: on some people, it kills them or gives them very
Speaker 2: serious things. This is one of the things that makes
Speaker 2: it difficult to pin this down, that kind of individual variation.
Speaker 2: And so what happens is with these pesticides, for example,
Speaker 2: they kill out a large portion of the original population,
Speaker 2: but some of them are not affected, and the ones
Speaker 2: who survived that then multiply and now you've got a
Speaker 2: new population that's not affected by that poison. So it
Speaker 2: did not evolve into some kind of a super bug
Speaker 2: or a super rodent or something like that. It's just
Speaker 2: we need to understand that when they're constantly hitting us
Speaker 2: with these lies about molecules demand evolution. But speaking of lies, again,
Speaker 2: that's the key thing. Take control of your children's education.
Speaker 2: The purpose of your education is to point them towards God.
Speaker 8: So many people that will say, well, you know, Genesis
Speaker 8: doesn't really matter one way or the other if it's this,
Speaker 8: you know, even if God used evolution is not that
Speaker 8: big deal. So it sets the foundation for the entire Bible.
Speaker 8: If you cannot trust the beginning of it, why can
Speaker 8: you trust any of it?
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 8: It sets the tone. It's you know, it's where you start,
Speaker 8: and you can trust it.
Speaker 2: It fits the facts better than either constantly evolving theories.
Speaker 2: The theories are what evolving. Well, I just want to
Speaker 2: encourage people to look at homeschooling and so along those lines,
Speaker 2: here's another exams the parental replacement centers that are being
Speaker 2: disguised as schools in Chicago. And this is an article
Speaker 2: that's on the New American. Actually I think Alex Newman
Speaker 2: had it. It was a reprint from another organization that putting
Speaker 2: this together fighting this. They call these things the sustainable
Speaker 2: community schools that should give you an idea of where
Speaker 2: this is coming from. The un Chicago's government school system
Speaker 2: is doubling down to take over more and more functions
Speaker 2: that were once reserved for families, voluntary associations, and churches.
Speaker 7: Before we move on to a new topic, do you
Speaker 7: want to get to the comments?
Speaker 8: Oh yeah, oh yeah, we've got a lot. Yeah, we've
Speaker 8: got a woots. Thank you very much, a woots. We
Speaker 8: appreciate it again. It's your support that keeps this show going.
Speaker 8: We can of thank you all enough for doing that.
Speaker 8: Says so great to see all the nights together. Would
Speaker 8: you consider interviewing Brian Burlettick?
Speaker 2: Do you know who he is?
Speaker 8: Don't know who that is. That's one of the problems
Speaker 8: with doing the show is we have very little time
Speaker 8: to actually learn about other people.
Speaker 7: Look at it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, or you can send us an email to
Speaker 2: David Knight's show at ProtonMail dot com.
Speaker 8: Yes, Nights of the Storm. I've been seeing paid ads
Speaker 8: on twigs that are showing people shopping in markets and
Speaker 8: gaza supposedly. Ask yourself, why are they paying for ads
Speaker 8: to show them having food?
Speaker 2: I wonder if that's some Israeli bots. Maybe that's maybe
Speaker 2: that's why they need to get that guy back.
Speaker 8: From Las Vegas out their nation that Gaza has trouble
Speaker 8: with that is known for having a lot of cyber
Speaker 8: security or cyber warfare units. I want to say there
Speaker 8: could be could be one of those.
Speaker 7: You don't understand they're losing the propaganda war because Gaza
Speaker 7: has so many boughts. They have right vast forces a
Speaker 7: rat against us. To quote net and Yahoo. Gaza and
Speaker 7: Palestine are manipulating the media to an extreme extent with
Speaker 7: their fingers in every media outwit.
Speaker 8: Yes, Knights of the Storm. You can't represent God and
Speaker 8: deny Jesus at the same time.
Speaker 2: Yes, true, It's amazing that Hukabe doesn't know that. Like
Speaker 2: I said, you mix politics with the religion and sometimes
Speaker 2: you just go pure politics chan with other religion out.
Speaker 2: That appears to be what Mike Kakabe's done. He's thrown
Speaker 2: out christ for his Zionist politics.
Speaker 8: Tonal Lord won three three seven. That's just a twisting
Speaker 8: of the doctrine that Jesus spoke of the world hates
Speaker 8: Christians because they hate God. Yeah, talking about Hukabees again
Speaker 8: just because oh well, they hate Jews because they hate God, No,
Speaker 8: they hate Christians, minute man militia. I think everyone would
Speaker 8: be shocked by how many people support UBI, even people
Speaker 8: I consider like minded. Yeah, I've seen a lot of people.
Speaker 2: I was amazed because I knew that was exactly what
Speaker 2: the stimulus check was about. And what was amazing to
Speaker 2: me was how quickly people latched on to that dependency.
Speaker 2: They wanted that stimulus check to continue.
Speaker 8: They loved it, they got a taste for it, and decided, well,
Speaker 8: you know what, my job treats me like garbage. They
Speaker 8: don't respect me. I'm not contributing anything meaningful and mostly
Speaker 8: pushing numbers around on a spreadsheet or sending emails that
Speaker 8: don't matter to people that don't matter all day. So
Speaker 8: why on earth would I go back?
Speaker 2: It was like some kind of drug that you know,
Speaker 2: first time you try it, your hook, you know. That's
Speaker 2: that's the way.
Speaker 8: It was, like, wait a minute, I don't have to
Speaker 8: go to this corporate hell scape where it's an hr
Speaker 8: nanny state, and you'll just pay me to stay home
Speaker 8: whatever you need me to do. Fine, I'll wear a mask.
Speaker 8: Even don't frag me, bro. Even Darwin stated that if
Speaker 8: you cannot find any transitional fossils and the theories incorrect.
Speaker 8: None have been found.
Speaker 2: That's right. And of course the other thing that was
Speaker 2: really a problem for him, and Michael Bayhy wrote a
Speaker 2: book called Darwin's Black Box, and he said, even in
Speaker 2: the eighteen hundreds, and when we went to the British Museum,
Speaker 2: remember they had that little display that was set up
Speaker 2: on the side, and it was Darwin's inst months and
Speaker 2: his desk and things like that, and he had to
Speaker 2: examine things he had just like a handheld magnifying glass.
Speaker 2: I said, no wonder he thought that life was coming
Speaker 2: spontaneously out of water. You know, how many tools to
Speaker 2: be able to even observe from the British Museum, Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: But he said that one of the problems that bugged
Speaker 2: him in his theory was the eye of the human
Speaker 2: eye and every eye of every creature. You know, how
Speaker 2: could something even he could understand with his limited tools
Speaker 2: that he had, he understood how complicated the eye was,
Speaker 2: because how is it adjusting the size of the iris
Speaker 2: in response to light and all the rest of stuff.
Speaker 2: He said, how could that happen just by random chance processes?
Speaker 2: So to him, that was this black box that really
Speaker 2: was a stumbling block for him with his theory of evolution,
Speaker 2: and Michael Bahey wrote an early work talking about intelligent
Speaker 2: design from that standpoint, and that's what he toddled. It
Speaker 2: was Darwin's black box, which is what intelligence is really about.
Speaker 8: Can't get it figured out? Yeah, don't I read that,
Speaker 8: Knights of the Storm responding, don't frag me, bro says.
Speaker 8: Darwin also recanted his entire theory later in life. They
Speaker 8: don't mention that in school.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, sorry, guys, I was wrong transition, transactional fossils
Speaker 2: and all the rest of the stuff. And he was
Speaker 2: very much tied in with the Huxley's or tied in
Speaker 2: with him. He was tied into Gen X's cousin that
Speaker 2: type of thing. He also had a club that was
Speaker 2: called the X Club, which.
Speaker 8: Also it wasn't his I want to say. His father
Speaker 8: was a preacher and he just had a huge chip
Speaker 8: on his shoulder about God in general, and so he
Speaker 8: set out to want to disprove it and would have
Speaker 8: done anything basically, well.
Speaker 2: You know, there's a lot of people who, especially in
Speaker 2: those days, would get into the clergy as a profession,
Speaker 2: and they were very cynical and disbelievers and that they
Speaker 2: just wanted to get into it to make money. It's
Speaker 2: just a way. So you know, you could look at that.
Speaker 2: If you're a family member, you see it as a hustle,
Speaker 2: you know. And I think you bother have had that
Speaker 2: same situation with Jerry Folwell of his son, you know
Speaker 2: who kind of left.
Speaker 8: But anyway, we've got alien poop. Evolution says a giraffe
Speaker 8: is just a horse that wanted leaves.
Speaker 2: David duh Well marketing inheritance. Yeah, he just kept going
Speaker 2: for those higher leaves. Each generation they stretch their neck
Speaker 2: a little bit more.
Speaker 8: Yeah, it's such a stupid concept. Brian dev McCartney. The
Speaker 8: heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament showeth
Speaker 8: his handiwork, Psalm nineteen one. That's right, The heavens declare
Speaker 8: his righteousness, and all the people see his glory, Psalm
Speaker 8: ninety seven six. Audi Eric Clapton said in nineteen ninety
Speaker 8: seven that computers will hurt musical creativity and skill today.
Speaker 8: He's right. There are AI artists quote unquote that think
Speaker 8: they are on the same level as Beethoven. Well, you know,
Speaker 8: a little delusion now and then.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I guess it's because they're decomposing.
Speaker 8: I was gonna say it's because if you listen to
Speaker 8: the stuff they create, you'd think they were deaf. But
Speaker 8: alien pop evolution and evolving limb would be a dead prey.
Speaker 8: That's right, that third leg that's going to help you
Speaker 8: go faster.
Speaker 2: You know. Well, that's one of the arguments that ken
Speaker 2: Ham would make. He said, you know they even in
Speaker 2: German they call bats flying mice, right defleeder mouse and
Speaker 2: says a flying mouse, he said, And so we have
Speaker 2: evolutionists to say that bats are evolved from mice, and
Speaker 2: he said, that doesn't make any sense. As they're starting
Speaker 2: to develop wings, and what is the special power of
Speaker 2: a mouse? They can squeeze into anything. If they start
Speaker 2: developing useless wings that don't allow them to fly, but
Speaker 2: make it harder for them to get into things, they
Speaker 2: become more vulnerable to predators. Rather than it has to
Speaker 2: all happen all at once, and that's.
Speaker 8: The great My favorite example is out of the flowers
Speaker 8: and the bumblebees. These two separate systems that are intrinsically linked.
Speaker 8: They all they both have to exist at the same time,
Speaker 8: or neither one gets to exist.
Speaker 2: Well, I just think about sexual reproduction, right, just in general,
Speaker 2: you have to have two complementary organisms, male and female
Speaker 2: to have sexual reproduction. I guess that's one of the
Speaker 2: reasons why they're working so hard on this gender stuff, Right,
Speaker 2: They've got to get rid of sexual reproduction. Maybe they
Speaker 2: get their factories and their artificial wombs, then they can
Speaker 2: remove that stumbling block. That another one of the stumbling
Speaker 2: blocks for Darwinism.
Speaker 8: Finally perfect true Darwinism just hasn't been tried yet.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 8: Knights of the Storm describing the difference between the concept
Speaker 8: of natural selection versus evolution. Yeah. Natural selection, of course,
Speaker 8: as we talked about, is just you know, the area
Speaker 8: has specific traits that are more useful there, and so
Speaker 8: the animals that have those traits to do better and
Speaker 8: produce more offspring, and therefore eventually they become the dominant
Speaker 8: and eventually only type of that creature there.
Speaker 2: That's right. Let's talk about the evolution of schools right now,
Speaker 2: and look at the deadly form that is taking under
Speaker 2: this new plan, Chicago will be expanding from twenty quote
Speaker 2: unquote sustainable community schools unquote to almost twice as many
Speaker 2: for next year. The twenty twenty five to twenty twenty
Speaker 2: six school year. The announcement on August fourth by Chicago officials,
Speaker 2: union bosses, and government education chiefs came even as the
Speaker 2: district faces a staggering budget hole of seven hundred and
Speaker 2: thirty four million dollars. This is a bankrupt system, folks,
Speaker 2: with bankrupt ideas. The idea behind sustainable community schools is
Speaker 2: to provide what government educators refer to as more services,
Speaker 2: even wrap around services. Yeah, this is a government that
Speaker 2: wraps around you like a book constrictor isn't it. Under
Speaker 2: the so called village model, everything from mental health and
Speaker 2: dental health to nutrition and quote family well being becomes
Speaker 2: the government school's responsibility. Think of them as parental and
Speaker 2: church replacement centers within the institutions. Everything for children, but
Speaker 2: the bedtime stories and the good night hugs for now
Speaker 2: become the responsibility of the state. Even parents can receive
Speaker 2: myriad services from the government schools as they become the
Speaker 2: new community hub, more access to resources for jobs, housing,
Speaker 2: said radical left wing mayor Brandon Johnson at a press
Speaker 2: conference announcing this massive expansion of the controversial program, as
Speaker 2: if it were government's job to feed and to house
Speaker 2: the population. The school graduated about two thirds of its
Speaker 2: victims in four years. Those students are victims of this system.
Speaker 2: But the Illinois State Board of Education data shows that
Speaker 2: even though two thirds of the victims graduating four years,
Speaker 2: the school did not have one single student that was
Speaker 2: proficient and either reading or math on standardized tests. Isn't
Speaker 2: that amazing? So they're graduating these victims, but they can't
Speaker 2: read and can't write proficiently.
Speaker 8: Yeah, sure, go out into the world.
Speaker 2: Fine, How they graduated without even basic proficiency is anything?
Speaker 2: Remains a mystery? Well not really. They said they squandered
Speaker 2: four thousand dollars more in taxpayer money per student, which
Speaker 2: is pretty amazing when you look at this. I mean,
Speaker 2: they're spending like, I don't know what it is now.
Speaker 2: A few years ago, some of the school districts that
Speaker 2: were the most left winging and wasteful, we're spending like
Speaker 2: twenty four thousand dollars per student. So that's a significant
Speaker 2: increase that you're putting in there. They said they couldn't
Speaker 2: produce even a single student proficient in any core subject,
Speaker 2: worse even than traditional government schools. Almost eighty percent of
Speaker 2: students were chronically absent at the academy as well showing
Speaker 2: up there. This is why I say to people who
Speaker 2: are afraid to take on homeschooling, folks, you can't possibly
Speaker 2: do worse than the government in terms of any of
Speaker 2: these aspects, in terms of reading or arithmetic or anything
Speaker 2: else like that. There's no way that you could do worse.
Speaker 2: Even if you've struggled in school, you can do better,
Speaker 2: and many things out there to help you to do that.
Speaker 7: Academically, yes, eighty percent were chronically absent, but it certainly
Speaker 7: didn't seem to help the twenty percent that were regular attendees.
Speaker 2: That's right. Yeah, the twenty percent who are there all
Speaker 2: the time still didn't know how to do math or
Speaker 2: how to read proficiently.
Speaker 8: And that should have been the ideal scenario for them
Speaker 8: because most of the other students are missing, so they've
Speaker 8: got more time to hone in on and spend time
Speaker 8: with these kids that are there.
Speaker 2: Well. You know, one of the things when we talked
Speaker 2: about James dobbson the other day, I think one of
Speaker 2: things that he really got right was he said, you know,
Speaker 2: when he's talking about discipline and things like that, he said,
Speaker 2: what is your purpose in discipline, He said, your purpose
Speaker 2: in discipline is to show the children what a good
Speaker 2: father looks like, so that they see.
Speaker 8: That, yeah, it's God. It's something that's come.
Speaker 2: To prepare them to understand the good father that God is.
Speaker 8: It's something that I've been thinking a lot more about
Speaker 8: since we've had our son, and just how I want
Speaker 8: to make sure that he can see God's love.
Speaker 1: Through my action.
Speaker 2: Well, the government wants to replace God and replace them.
Speaker 8: They can try, but they can never succeed. There is
Speaker 8: no replacement for God. There's no replacement for the family.
Speaker 8: We really do appreciate you all joining us here today.
Speaker 8: We cannot thank you enough for your support. We'll see
Speaker 8: you all tomorrow. God bless you all have a wonderful
Speaker 8: rest of your day.
Speaker 2: The common man, they created common Core and dumb down
Speaker 2: our children. They created common past track and control us.
Speaker 2: They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
Speaker 2: and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,
Speaker 2: unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity
Speaker 2: created in the image of God. That is what we
Speaker 2: have in common. That is what they want to take away.
Speaker 2: Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
Speaker 2: to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.
Speaker 2: It's time to turn that around and expose they want
Speaker 2: to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find
Speaker 2: at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank
Speaker 2: you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please
Speaker 2: keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com