Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, it's a search warrant and we're alive. It's
Speaker 1: a uh, you know, I outstanding Wednesday. All kinds of
Speaker 1: shit happening. So we'll talk about that and more. But
Speaker 1: you can listen to us on a KGr Radio rumble,
Speaker 1: LinkedIn Facebook, iHeart, Spotify, and speaker. I'm sure I'm missing something,
Speaker 1: but you can get us on an hour wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts anyway. We've got actually, we have three
Speaker 1: special guests. We've got Marcus C. Williams, the conservative voice
Speaker 1: of New York that will be joining us as soon
Speaker 1: as you can get on, and the CEO of ali
Speaker 1: Van Technologies, Glenn Fogerty, who has just lost power but
Speaker 1: he'll be back. And then we have Jason Goodman who
Speaker 1: is with crowdsource Thetruth dot Com and he's had very
Speaker 1: a lot of controversial things come out, and we'll have
Speaker 1: him at three. So let's kill off some of the
Speaker 1: stupid stuff while these guys are trying to get their
Speaker 1: stuff together. Let's see here, So did we talk about
Speaker 1: the the rapture last week?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: Okay, last week? Last week was supposed to be the rapture.
Speaker 3: Batch.
Speaker 1: Hang on a second, let me see if I can
Speaker 1: find it. Oh so you thought the rapture was over,
Speaker 1: So not so fast, my friends.
Speaker 4: It's this The rapture is back on.
Speaker 5: And you might think that the pastor who gave the
Speaker 5: original prophecy that it was going to be on September
Speaker 5: twenty third, was wrong, But you would be wrong because
Speaker 5: he was actually right all along. And I know what thinking,
Speaker 5: how could that be? You did not see any bodies
Speaker 5: flying towards this guy on September twenty third, Well, it
Speaker 5: is because we were using the wrong calendar. Jesus doesn't
Speaker 5: know that we changed our calendar and we should have
Speaker 5: been using the Julian calendar because that is the calendar
Speaker 5: that they used back in the day. So it is
Speaker 5: now rescheduled to October six to seventh.
Speaker 3: That calendar is behind by the Dinties.
Speaker 5: Now Percy is very relieved because he was very stressed
Speaker 5: out about this.
Speaker 6: He thought that God had.
Speaker 5: Spoken to him directly and that it was going to
Speaker 5: be on September twenty third. But now it all makes
Speaker 5: sense and he is not alone. There are a lot
Speaker 5: of people who are coming back online and saying that
Speaker 5: they are sure this time.
Speaker 7: Because he when he was on the earth the Julian
Speaker 7: calendar was the calendar they followed, So he is going
Speaker 7: to come.
Speaker 5: Back on the feast of Trumpets on the Julian calendar.
Speaker 5: Here's where I have some disappointing news. The guy that
Speaker 5: sold his car and said that he was no longer
Speaker 5: going to talk about the rapture publicly, he has pretty
Speaker 5: much walked that back at this point. He's been making
Speaker 5: a lot of videos about the rapture, and while he
Speaker 5: has not said that it will be on October sixth
Speaker 5: or seventh, he is liking a bunch of comments and
Speaker 5: kind of being like win wink about it because he
Speaker 5: said he wasn't going to say the exact date, but
Speaker 5: he is saying it without saying it.
Speaker 8: I got my chow fa yesterday here.
Speaker 6: Jesus is coming very very soon, if you know, you know,
Speaker 6: wink wink.
Speaker 5: So it looks like we are going to get to
Speaker 5: do all of this again very soon, and I will
Speaker 5: keep you updated on any rapture news.
Speaker 1: Jesus. I can't wait, Jesus. So they're off seven day
Speaker 1: The Julian calendar is off seven days. Yes, yeh god,
Speaker 1: oh my god. Okay, well so that's good. So let's
Speaker 1: uh what else do we have? Oh, you know I
Speaker 1: was incline. It would be for to be here for this. Well,
Speaker 1: let's do this. This is the best sound that most.
Speaker 2: Of us are heard, a sound that's better than this.
Speaker 1: Let's you for you, Brandon Johnson, Mayor of Chicago. Okay,
Speaker 1: so you know, I don't know. Have you ever driven
Speaker 1: a windowless van?
Speaker 4: H No?
Speaker 1: Okay, but there's a lot of advantages to windowless vans. Right,
Speaker 1: let's check them out.
Speaker 9: They don't get taken for a ride, get a ride
Speaker 9: for the taking. I'm selling windowless vans. Are you tired
Speaker 9: of questions about your business just because the cops don't?
Speaker 9: You hate it when a complete stranger becomes another witness.
Speaker 9: You won't believe your eyes because you can't. I'm selling
Speaker 9: windowless vans. When guy closes the door, he opens a window,
Speaker 9: not if I can help it.
Speaker 1: In a windowless van.
Speaker 9: Your backseat driver won't have a backseat robbing Peter to
Speaker 9: pay Paul in a windowless van. Paul will help you.
Speaker 9: In a windowless van, you'll pass go and collect two
Speaker 9: hundred dollars cutting through red tape In a windowless van,
Speaker 9: we would never use tape. A picture's worth one thousand dollars.
Speaker 2: Wait, I'm not sure that's.
Speaker 9: We offer finance options. Authorities can explore and compare in
Speaker 9: a windowless van. You'll never get caught asleep at the wheel.
Speaker 9: In my windowless vans, the squeaky wheel always gets the grease.
Speaker 9: The road to hell is paved with good intentions in
Speaker 9: a windowless van. Turn that fifth wheel into a third
Speaker 9: and a brand new windowless van.
Speaker 4: So John, I've never driven a windowless van. I've rode
Speaker 4: in a few in my time.
Speaker 1: Yeah, oh god. All right. So the title of this
Speaker 1: episode is high Fi Value Targets, and it's kind of
Speaker 1: directed at the Mayor of Chicago, Brandon Johnson. But I
Speaker 1: just want to run a couple of things. I mean,
Speaker 1: he said some uh controversial things uh recently. Let's listen
Speaker 1: to a couple of these.
Speaker 6: Oah yeah, kah.
Speaker 3: Kah, yeah, okay.
Speaker 1: And he's praising a black famil that killed a Chicago
Speaker 1: police officer.
Speaker 4: Insanity.
Speaker 1: Yes, exactly. Here we go with a little bit more.
Speaker 8: Ripping families apart. It's not the first time this country
Speaker 8: has done this, and this is why it's important that
Speaker 8: has black and brown folks we stand together, because I
Speaker 8: come from a lineage which this country write black mothers
Speaker 8: and black fathers away from black children to build this
Speaker 8: capitalistic society, and they're doing it again.
Speaker 1: As I've said before, this is not hyperbolic.
Speaker 8: There are those in this country who still believe that
Speaker 8: the Civil War went.
Speaker 6: The wrong way.
Speaker 8: And I just want immigrants community, whether you're documented or not.
Speaker 10: And this country.
Speaker 8: Has done these type of acts before, and that there are.
Speaker 10: People who understand that.
Speaker 8: And because we do understand that, it's why I'm able
Speaker 8: to stand so boldly and so firmly an opposition to
Speaker 8: what this government is doing, ripping families apart while advigating
Speaker 8: their responsibility to actually fix our broken immigration system.
Speaker 1: Okay, so, uh, why don't you catch your your how
Speaker 1: to your ass? Brandon and a lot of those aliens are,
Speaker 1: you know, high profile threats, trende stuff like that. Harry
Speaker 1: wants to say more.
Speaker 10: Yes, we cannot incarcerate our way out of violence.
Speaker 1: We've already tried that.
Speaker 10: If we've ended up with the largest prison population in
Speaker 10: the world without solving the problems of crime and violence,
Speaker 10: the addiction on jails and incarceration in this country, we
Speaker 10: have moved past that.
Speaker 1: It is racist, it is.
Speaker 10: Immoral, It is unholy, and it is not the way
Speaker 10: to drive violence down. We cannot return to the same
Speaker 10: failed strategies that got us here in the first place.
Speaker 10: Under the previous presidential administration, we requested more federal resources
Speaker 10: to address gun violence in our city. We continue to
Speaker 10: make that same call. We have made significant progress on
Speaker 10: our own, but there is so much more that we
Speaker 10: can do if we had real support from the federal government.
Speaker 1: Okay, you're so full of shit, man, I just don't
Speaker 1: understand him, or is I mean, all of those are
Speaker 1: appalling everything that he said. Let's have some good news
Speaker 1: from the Secretary of War.
Speaker 11: This administration has done a great deal from day one
Speaker 11: to remove the social justice, politically correct, and toxic ideological
Speaker 11: garbage that had infected our department.
Speaker 8: To rip out the politics.
Speaker 11: No more identity months, dei offices, dudes in dresses, no
Speaker 11: more climate change worship, no more division distraction or gender delusions,
Speaker 11: no more debris.
Speaker 2: As I've said before and we'll say again, we are
Speaker 2: done with that shit. I've made it my mission.
Speaker 11: To uproot the obvious distractions that made us less capable
Speaker 11: and less lethal. That said, the War Department requires the
Speaker 11: next step underneath the garbage is a deeper problem and
Speaker 11: a more important problem that we are fixing and fixing fast.
Speaker 11: Common sense is back at the White House, So making
Speaker 11: the necessity changes is actually pretty straightforward. President Trump expects it.
Speaker 11: And the litmus test for these changes it's pretty simple.
Speaker 11: Would I want my eldest son, who is fifteen years
Speaker 11: old eventually joining the types of formations that we are
Speaker 11: currently wielding? If in any way the answer to that
Speaker 11: is no, or even yes, but then we're doing something
Speaker 11: wrong because my son is no more important than any
Speaker 11: other American citizen who dons the cloth of our nation.
Speaker 11: He is no more important than your son, all precious
Speaker 11: souls made in the image and.
Speaker 2: Likeness of God.
Speaker 11: Every parent deserves to know that their son or their
Speaker 11: daughter that joins our ranks is entering exactly the kind
Speaker 11: of unit that the Secretary of War would want his
Speaker 11: son to join.
Speaker 12: It.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and is also so got the generals doing the
Speaker 1: fat generals doing PT tests two times a year, So
Speaker 1: that's good. That's very good. They got to wake up.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's so many problems on military now because
Speaker 1: of d I it's unbelievable. I mean, I'll take it,
Speaker 1: will take them a while to uh get that unscrewed.
Speaker 4: I think really that's the amount of in service training
Speaker 4: that both the active duty, reserve and civil civil service
Speaker 4: has to do every year is just amazing. I mean,
Speaker 4: there's you know that you have the basic Prevention of
Speaker 4: sexual harassment, Hostile work environment.
Speaker 1: EO.
Speaker 4: Uh you know uh p I I Personally Identifiable Information,
Speaker 4: the Information Assurance Awareness. You know, it's just a litany
Speaker 4: of courses that you have to take online, uh in
Speaker 4: service every year. It's required tired that that for the military.
Speaker 4: Guy's the active duty and you have to do it.
Speaker 4: And then if you're a manager, you get all that
Speaker 4: plus the management version of it.
Speaker 1: Yeah. But I mean, you know DEI, it is being
Speaker 1: used in the military now to attack this plan.
Speaker 4: Yeah. I was very fortunate that I was done as
Speaker 4: the DEI stuff was coming in. Yeah, but I have
Speaker 4: friends that they were affected by the de I stuff.
Speaker 4: It's appalling, as you know, and luckily, I mean that
Speaker 4: evolved about the time that COVID was still being dealt with, right, I.
Speaker 1: Mean, uh, trying to get your soldiers, sailors, marines to
Speaker 1: reach the next level in their ability to reach the
Speaker 1: the uh uh you know the highest they can do,
Speaker 1: which is, uh, you know, everybody should be reaching for that.
Speaker 1: And when when somebody makes a comment about, you know,
Speaker 1: you want to reach your potential, you know, you want
Speaker 1: to be the you know, the toughest badass on the planet,
Speaker 1: and then you get an eioca plant. Yeah, I oh,
Speaker 1: you know, uh, God, just terrrible. Okay, So I just
Speaker 1: got a message from Marcus. He's going to be coming
Speaker 1: on here shortly. Hopefully we can tell us what the
Speaker 1: hell's going on with the socialist So but I want
Speaker 1: to tell you what's happening in healthcare now.
Speaker 7: Yes, they got fired this group of healthcare workers at
Speaker 7: Samsung Clinic in Santa Barbara, California that posted that disturbing
Speaker 7: TikTok video We're fired. Sutter Health released this statement. Sutter
Speaker 7: Health has terminated the employees responsible for the inappropriate and
Speaker 7: insensitive photos posted on social media. The sense deleted videos
Speaker 7: showed several former employees at Samsung Clinic in Santa Barbara
Speaker 7: posing with bodily fluid left by patients who were seated
Speaker 7: on the paper covering the exam tables. In the caption,
Speaker 7: they wrote guests as substance, and in the video They wrote,
Speaker 7: are patients allowed to leave you guys gifts? Followed by
Speaker 7: this series of photos. Reportedly, the video was posted by
Speaker 7: a former employee who hadn't worked with a facility in
Speaker 7: two months. The final photo said make sure to leave
Speaker 7: your healthcare workers' sweet gifts like these. Although the original
Speaker 7: TikTok video was deleted and the account set to private,
Speaker 7: screen recordings of the workers quickly spread across other platforms,
Speaker 7: sparking widespread outrage. A lot of people online are saying
Speaker 7: that just being terminated isn't enough. They believe the workers
Speaker 7: involved should have their medical licenses completely revoked. What do
Speaker 7: you think? Do you agree with that or do you
Speaker 7: feel losing their jobsless punishment enough. I want to know
Speaker 7: where you stand on this. Share your thoughts in the comments.
Speaker 1: If they have more character so low that they do that,
Speaker 1: why should they be employed by any other healthcare organization.
Speaker 4: That's not the hospital I want to go to, that's
Speaker 4: for sure.
Speaker 1: Oh my god, So that's California. But I'm sure that
Speaker 1: it happens at other places. Let's take a look at
Speaker 1: Larry Klausner.
Speaker 2: This is.
Speaker 1: I think it's Philly surge that ran into Larry Krausner
Speaker 1: while he was on a bike trip in Philadelphia. But
Speaker 1: what a piece of work? Okay, I mean piece of shit.
Speaker 13: You'll tell you what, Frank. Just keep lying, Frank, just
Speaker 13: keep lying. Oh my, I touch the camera.
Speaker 3: Trump is a fascist?
Speaker 1: Cow Is Donald Trump a fascist?
Speaker 14: Frank?
Speaker 12: Cow is Donald Trump?
Speaker 2: And Fastank?
Speaker 14: Did I ask you to come over and bother me
Speaker 14: when I'm sitting here drinking coffee in a park today?
Speaker 12: Your own public property? Brother? Oh?
Speaker 3: Is that your theory?
Speaker 10: Yes?
Speaker 2: Frank, you're an American?
Speaker 6: Frank, you're American.
Speaker 15: You're anti American.
Speaker 12: I'm a resident of this city who cares about public safety.
Speaker 12: Why are you calling me an American?
Speaker 15: Because you support people who support hate. You don't understand
Speaker 15: what it means to be a fascist what people like
Speaker 15: Adolf Hitler do. How spreading hate, which is something that
Speaker 15: frankly the people you admire do, gets us closer to that.
Speaker 3: This is about you?
Speaker 2: How can you say that?
Speaker 12: Why don't you Why don't you have a conversation about
Speaker 12: about these things with me? Why are you accusing me?
Speaker 14: The reason I would talk to a twenty two year
Speaker 14: old who disrupts meetings? Oh so, now, the reason I
Speaker 14: would talk to a twenty year old who knows nothing
Speaker 14: he's talking about about meetings?
Speaker 1: Is what?
Speaker 2: Frank?
Speaker 6: You are welcome to write whatever you.
Speaker 15: Want and you're not existing fake paper.
Speaker 13: You're welcome to do that.
Speaker 12: We have more use than your TikTok we have, we
Speaker 12: get more use than you.
Speaker 2: I mean, that's not true.
Speaker 6: You're one video that's.
Speaker 13: Not even remotely true. I'll tell you what, Frank, just
Speaker 13: keep lying, Frank, just keep ying. Oh my, I touch
Speaker 13: your camera.
Speaker 2: I'll tell you what.
Speaker 14: Why don't you let good people at Philadelphia have meetings
Speaker 14: where you behave yourself, let you, we let you in.
Speaker 13: You're actually not allowed to do this without my permission.
Speaker 2: Is the second time. I'm not going to do anything about.
Speaker 14: It because I figure there's hope for even you people.
Speaker 6: There a second chance.
Speaker 15: No matter how un American you are, anti anti American
Speaker 15: you are.
Speaker 3: I figure you deserve a second champ.
Speaker 12: And you're a public official, somebody should hold you accountable,
Speaker 12: which I'm doing. And that's American. That's what America is about.
Speaker 12: It's about holding politicians accountable and disagreeing and arguing. So
Speaker 12: you should learn how to do it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, so what a piece of work man Jesus.
Speaker 1: So this is him on his bicycle. Check out the helmet.
Speaker 4: And he had a fanny pack, so oh god.
Speaker 1: And that was his girlfriend. That was his uh, you
Speaker 1: know girlfriend. So his first go to is you're an American,
Speaker 1: you're a fascist. I think it's on American and then
Speaker 1: you're a fascist, right, So.
Speaker 4: I don't understand. So, as you know, I went to
Speaker 4: UH State College in Pennsylvania and a schooled in Marxism.
Speaker 4: All my criminal justice professors were self proclaimed Marxist. Great,
Speaker 4: and I got taught victimology and all the things that
Speaker 4: go with it, and you know, ethnic minorities and those.
Speaker 4: So I got schooled and I can understand the concept
Speaker 4: behind what they were teaching. But then there's this, you know,
Speaker 4: fast forward ahead to twenty twenty five. I don't understand
Speaker 4: what the mayor of Chicago and the district attorney in Philadelphia,
Speaker 4: so they just don't want to put anybody in jail.
Speaker 4: And Krasner's idea is that anybody who commits murder, he's
Speaker 4: not going to try them. And then and the mayor
Speaker 4: of Philadelphia saying that we just don't put people in
Speaker 4: jail for doing criminal activity. So what's what's the goal here?
Speaker 4: I don't understand the goal or the thought process.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so let's have an update from Glen Forward to
Speaker 1: the CEO of Olivon Technologies. And this is a quote
Speaker 1: some douchebag cracks crashed into the pole, that they're fixing
Speaker 1: it already, but rogers out to get on so far.
Speaker 1: So anyway, so we've got some douchebag running around New
Speaker 1: Jersey hitting electric poles, which probably happens on a regular basis, right,
Speaker 1: all right, And you know Marcus is doing everything you
Speaker 1: can to get on. But as I mentioned, as we've
Speaker 1: mentioned to you before, he's fighting socialists twenty four to
Speaker 1: seven through sixty five. So hopefully he can give us
Speaker 1: an update on the socialist fight. So I wanted to
Speaker 1: just address we have breaking news about an hour and
Speaker 1: twenty minutes of breaking news on Monday relative to the
Speaker 1: post conviction Relief Act issued by Jerry Sandy or on
Speaker 1: behalf of Jerry by Frank Parlato. This is Frank aff David,
Speaker 1: and I think he has he has publis said online
Speaker 1: and you really need to read it because it's uh
Speaker 1: for those of you that were just reading headlines and
Speaker 1: not critically thinking about what was missing. You know it
Speaker 1: would beho view too. Ah, not remain or ignorant and
Speaker 1: to read of Frank Parlotto's AFFI, David Craig, you've read
Speaker 1: that AFFI, David, I mean pretty I mean I'll just uh,
Speaker 1: I'll just to get what we're waiting for our other guests,
Speaker 1: So just run through it quick. It's uh, I'm not
Speaker 1: going to run through it quickly because it's like huge,
Speaker 1: but maybe highlights. So Frank, Frank Carlotto again came up
Speaker 1: with this, David, it's a pattern of perjury and mutually
Speaker 1: exclusive testimony. We've got Marcus, Hey, Marcus, how you doing?
Speaker 1: Can you can you bring Marcus up? Can you bring
Speaker 1: Marcus up?
Speaker 12: Hey?
Speaker 6: How are you guys?
Speaker 1: How are you doing?
Speaker 3: Hey?
Speaker 1: Now, thank you very much for I wanted you to
Speaker 1: have you come on as well, because uh, you know,
Speaker 1: Glenn was originally supposed to be here. Two the power
Speaker 1: went out and some dufice in New Jersey is hitting
Speaker 1: power lines, you know, making power go away. But more importantly,
Speaker 1: I wanted to have you on because our guest at
Speaker 1: three o'clock has a lot of a lot of theories
Speaker 1: about Charlie Kirk and what happened to Charlie, you know
Speaker 1: what I mean. But I was lunch. We had an
Speaker 1: hour twenty minute breaking news thing on Monday relative to
Speaker 1: a post conviction relief act in regard to Jerry Sandusky,
Speaker 1: the alleged child abuser guy in from Penn State, the
Speaker 1: former defensive coordinator for Penn State. And it was very
Speaker 1: interesting because Frank Perolatto, the investigator report that we've had
Speaker 1: on before, came out with an affidavit and I was
Speaker 1: just going through that telling people that they should take
Speaker 1: a look at that affidavit if they only read headlines
Speaker 1: during the Sandowsky case, because if you were only reading
Speaker 1: the headlines, you're not informed at all. It's the exact
Speaker 1: opposite of what you what you heard. I mean, it
Speaker 1: was an extra exercise and to jump it down for
Speaker 1: people that were reading the headlines at that time. It
Speaker 1: was a politically motivated vindictive act on the part of
Speaker 1: a governor who didn't I didn't like the university for
Speaker 1: a variety of different reasons, and used everything at at
Speaker 1: his disposal to include narcotics agents investigating child sex abuse cases.
Speaker 1: I mean, who does that, you know? And then and
Speaker 1: then it turns out that the prosecutors are at this
Speaker 1: very moment benefiting from the greg was it what was it,
Speaker 1: one hundred and twenty million dollars payout?
Speaker 4: I thought it was two twenty times.
Speaker 1: Yeah, payout because they control the trust. Crazy. So, Marcus,
Speaker 1: what's happening in Rochester? Now we've got any you know,
Speaker 1: there's the socialists are running wild?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: Have they come up with anything new and exciting?
Speaker 6: Well, we just had a guide that was we had
Speaker 6: apparently the guy was illegal. Now I'm not able to
Speaker 6: confirm or deny that, but apparently the guy was illegal
Speaker 6: and he was stabbed to death by another illegal alien.
Speaker 6: Now the stabber was definitely an illegal the state, I
Speaker 6: am not one hundred percent sure on. But it's just
Speaker 6: the madness that we have going on in our city
Speaker 6: that's put in place by these ridiculous policies that are
Speaker 6: set to hamstring not only the police from enforcing public safety,
Speaker 6: but also hurting our businesses and our people that are
Speaker 6: just every day community members and citizens trying to live
Speaker 6: their life. It's not just that we got everything else
Speaker 6: going on too.
Speaker 1: Yeah, has the Okay? So I think I was going
Speaker 1: to ask you this before, and I don't know whether
Speaker 1: we covered it or not, but as the mayor directed
Speaker 1: the police chief not to have the Rochester Police, it's
Speaker 1: just ice.
Speaker 6: In a very public way. So it was so bad
Speaker 6: that Tom Holman came up here to give our police
Speaker 6: some encouragement because the mayor and the police chief got
Speaker 6: on the television and they were like, you're bad. Don't
Speaker 6: help ICE. Because what happened was is HTS, which is
Speaker 6: essentially the FBI portion of DHS, came here and they
Speaker 6: were looking for people that were involved with human smuggling.
Speaker 6: So they went after a human smuggling ring and they
Speaker 6: were trying to get these people and then all of
Speaker 6: these protesters came and started acting up, so they sent
Speaker 6: they said we need back up, and they called the police.
Speaker 6: The police came, they didn't even the police didn't even
Speaker 6: really do anything.
Speaker 13: You know.
Speaker 6: The mayor got very mad on that and he just
Speaker 6: went off on a tangent. I guess somebody put a
Speaker 6: thumb on his on his desk and change his scales.
Speaker 6: You know, that was ridiculous. And since then we've had
Speaker 6: multiple issues. Just last week we had we made national
Speaker 6: news again because they slashed border patrols tires after they
Speaker 6: were going Yeah, right, it's just continued, continued nonsense. And
Speaker 6: for me, somebody who has continuously advocated against the use
Speaker 6: of the National Guard since Cuomo, you know, because it's
Speaker 6: always been been a big thing under Cuomo, Under Kathy,
Speaker 6: they're trying to get rid of our local police forces
Speaker 6: and use the national Guard because they're completely under their power.
Speaker 6: They're not responsive to local municipalities or any of our
Speaker 6: elected officials. Yeah, and it's like these people now are like, oh,
Speaker 6: well Trump is sitting in the National Guard places and
Speaker 6: heat Orange Man bad and this, that and the third.
Speaker 6: But you're creating a situation. You're out here cutting the
Speaker 6: tires on Border Patrol's car like you're stopping them from
Speaker 6: apprehending criminals, like.
Speaker 1: It's the mayor.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 1: My initial thought in regard to that is if the
Speaker 1: Man and the Socialists want to keep their positions, they
Speaker 1: have to have a certain amount of votes. Obviously, Yes,
Speaker 1: those illegal I means you know they're voting, well, voting downtown.
Speaker 6: We just had a case of that guy that was
Speaker 6: in what was it Des Moines that was illegal, that
Speaker 6: was the school board. Yeah, and he's been super vote
Speaker 6: for a decade.
Speaker 1: How do you get to be a school board super
Speaker 1: or a school superintendent.
Speaker 6: I don't know.
Speaker 1: I mean, I must have had a lot of documents
Speaker 1: or anything.
Speaker 6: Well they said that, the district said they did the
Speaker 6: right way and filed for the I nine and everything
Speaker 6: like that. So I don't know if it's a federal
Speaker 6: deficiency there with the processing of those or what.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but what what made him a eligible to a
Speaker 1: school superintendent? I mean he's superintendent. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: it's crazy. You don't need these superintendents. And they don't
Speaker 1: need to have a government paid.
Speaker 6: For a car, that's true.
Speaker 1: And they don't have to be you know, taking trips
Speaker 1: to France just to you know, for ships and giggles
Speaker 1: on your dime.
Speaker 6: This is crazy, This is not it is And like
Speaker 6: him as, I mean, why.
Speaker 1: Do you need a super superintendent? Well, I mean your
Speaker 1: school board should be I mean, they don't do anything.
Speaker 1: Their figurehead and they and when they get in trouble
Speaker 1: in one district, they move to another one.
Speaker 6: Yep, yep. We've had that happen with many of ours.
Speaker 6: We can't keep anybody more than two years.
Speaker 2: Ah.
Speaker 6: You know, it's really really bad here. The education system
Speaker 6: is terrible. And because we've got all these socialists, none
Speaker 6: of them want to really fix it, Like they talk
Speaker 6: about all of this nonsense. Oh well, let's put social
Speaker 6: emotional education and alphabetism and all of this other stuff
Speaker 6: and activism. But the fact of the matter is is
Speaker 6: that the kids are unable to read, write, or do
Speaker 6: basic math, and you're pushing all this extra stuff on them.
Speaker 6: Can we focus on the basics and there's no oversight
Speaker 6: and that's the biggest problem.
Speaker 1: But do you I mean the mayor is not letting
Speaker 1: d is being may Maybe he thinks that way, but
Speaker 1: he's being fourthd to some degree to not have the
Speaker 1: police department help with ice. Is that do you think
Speaker 1: I mean it's because they're voter base.
Speaker 6: No, I honestly, I don't think it's the voter base
Speaker 6: for at least for the mayor. Like I can't say
Speaker 6: for other people, but at least for the mayor. I
Speaker 6: don't think it's that. I think it's pressure from Albany.
Speaker 6: I think it's pressure from New York City.
Speaker 1: Oh god, you know.
Speaker 6: And that's what it is is New York City runs
Speaker 6: Upstate New York. They run, and we don't have anybody
Speaker 6: with a backbone or spine to stand up with them here.
Speaker 6: Sadly enough, that's why I fight so hard for our
Speaker 6: community because it's like, I mean, you.
Speaker 1: Know, you've got a you've got a very good tact
Speaker 1: in that you're trying to change things from the you know,
Speaker 1: from the local level up. Because we've had several you know,
Speaker 1: legislative people on I think you know them, Dav Pietro.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I loved it.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, he's awesome man, you know, and he tries
Speaker 1: to do everything you can. But the legislature in New
Speaker 1: York is a super majority.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 6: Yeah, so you're like, oh, listen, you might.
Speaker 1: As well just be beating your head against the wall.
Speaker 6: Right, Yeah, And that's part of the problem. You know,
Speaker 6: a lot of times we see people getting discouraged, and
Speaker 6: I encourage people don't get discouraged, have faith, get out
Speaker 6: participate because the only way to really make a difference
Speaker 6: is to overwhelm the vote. We have to get enough
Speaker 6: people out that are willing to vote differently, willing to
Speaker 6: see another option, to actually make the difference. And I
Speaker 6: encourage anybody watching, you got to get active locally with
Speaker 6: your local people, running for city council, running for school board.
Speaker 6: That's where we can make the change. Once we shore
Speaker 6: up local areas, then we can move on and focus
Speaker 6: on the state and stuff like that. But until we
Speaker 6: in the community start getting active, nobody's coming to save us.
Speaker 6: So nothing that is ever going to get done, nothing's
Speaker 6: ever going to get changed. So help local candidates and
Speaker 6: get active yourself. Maybe even you are a person that
Speaker 6: might want to run in the future, but if you're listening,
Speaker 6: I encourage you, guys, go to my website Marcus the
Speaker 6: number four Rochester dot com and you can donate right
Speaker 6: on there. You don't have to be local to donate,
Speaker 6: right and if you're in the area, you could also volunteer.
Speaker 6: That'll be all as well. Now, one of the most
Speaker 6: important facts with any type of a campaign. While funds
Speaker 6: are very, very very important, it's also people that are
Speaker 6: willing to knock doors and get out in the community
Speaker 6: to help good candidates get their voices heard. So I
Speaker 6: encourage you if you can't, if you can't volunteer, police
Speaker 6: do donate for sure, and you don't have to be
Speaker 6: local to donate. And one message I'd leave everybody with
Speaker 6: before we move a little bit forward is that remember
Speaker 6: to let other people know that whether they're Democrat or
Speaker 6: independent or working families whatever, that they don't have to
Speaker 6: vote for the people that are on their party line.
Speaker 6: They can vote for anybody that they want to in
Speaker 6: the general election. And that's very very important.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't think people that has been you know,
Speaker 1: illustrated enough to people for them to understand that, right,
Speaker 1: you know. I mean, if you if you want to
Speaker 1: sit there and have a bunch of socialists tell you
Speaker 1: what to do, that's crazy, crazy. I mean, you're just
Speaker 1: giving up. You're you're giving up.
Speaker 6: Don't give up, don't give up, have hope, have no.
Speaker 1: Exactly exactly the same thing applies to you know, if
Speaker 1: you're listening to us in West Virginia or California or somewhere,
Speaker 1: I mean, and you're not. You don't want to be,
Speaker 1: uh subject to a socialist moving in take it over. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, I hope Marcus out so we can fight
Speaker 1: them here, you know, because that will spread.
Speaker 6: Obviously it does spread. Look at what we've seen with
Speaker 6: California and how they've just invaded the rest of the
Speaker 6: everything over there, Washington, Oregon, Nevada, Colorado, even parts of
Speaker 6: Texas like in New York is spreading to everywhere else.
Speaker 4: It's it's shocked.
Speaker 1: It's it's shocking where it's at. I mean even in Tennessee, Graig.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I was gonna say even in Tennessee, right, that's right. Yeah,
Speaker 6: So we've got to stand up. The fight is where
Speaker 6: we are. If you think moving is going to make
Speaker 6: a difference, it's not. It's only going to give them
Speaker 6: time to circle the wagons and get more consolidated and
Speaker 6: come down there wherever you are, so help people that
Speaker 6: are finding Yeah.
Speaker 1: And they've they've decided that they just some degree want
Speaker 1: to be violent if they don't get their way. Right.
Speaker 6: Oh yeah, like very large babies. It's crazy, yeah, exactly.
Speaker 1: Uh Marcus, we had you on when we were talking
Speaker 1: about the rapture, right, yes, okay, so you know there's
Speaker 1: there's been an update.
Speaker 6: Oh oh did we miss it?
Speaker 1: Well, no, we ran it. But I wanted to give
Speaker 1: you a benefit to see the benefit of seeing the
Speaker 1: update and the rapture.
Speaker 5: The rapture is back on. And you might think that
Speaker 5: the pastor who gave the original prophecy that it was
Speaker 5: going to be on September twenty third, was wrong, but
Speaker 5: you would be wrong because he was actually right all
Speaker 5: along and I know what you're thinking, how could that
Speaker 5: be you did not see any bodies flying towards the
Speaker 5: sky on September twenty third. Well, it is because we
Speaker 5: were using the wrong calendar. Jesus doesn't know that we
Speaker 5: changed our calendar and we should have been using the
Speaker 5: Julian calendar because that is the calendar that they used
Speaker 5: back in the day. So it is now rescheduled to
Speaker 5: October six to seventh.
Speaker 1: That calendar is behind by the duties.
Speaker 5: Now Percy is very relieved because he was very stressed
Speaker 5: out about this. He thought that God had spoken to
Speaker 5: him directly and that it was going to be on
Speaker 5: September twenty third. But now it all makes sense and
Speaker 5: he is not alone. There are a lot of people
Speaker 5: who are coming back online and saying that they are
Speaker 5: sure this time.
Speaker 1: Because so, Marcus, what are your thoughts on that?
Speaker 6: You know, listen, I mean, I guess if you got
Speaker 6: to believe in something, even something real foolish, is that
Speaker 6: the message that we're saying there, you know, aside from
Speaker 6: the rapture not being biblically orcturally sound, you know, that's
Speaker 6: the number one point. I know a lot of Christians
Speaker 6: still believe in it though, but to believe that some
Speaker 6: rando and I'm not saying he's like some random, random person,
Speaker 6: but he's essentially some random person that's telling you that
Speaker 6: the that it's going to end on an exact day,
Speaker 6: that the rapture is coming on an exact day, when
Speaker 6: the Bible says very clearly that even Jesus didn't know
Speaker 6: the time, but it was going to happen. So this
Speaker 6: is this is part of the issue, right there. I mean,
Speaker 6: don't don't play in my face. It's like, there, what
Speaker 6: I do? They're pissing in telling you it's raining?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: Oh my god. So I just got this comment from LinkedIn,
Speaker 1: but Leslie, by the way, from LinkedIn, thank you very much.
Speaker 1: It's kind of a long comment. But we're going to
Speaker 1: address this in the second hour. She says, as you've
Speaker 1: probably seen the two men around Charlie Kirk, we're doing
Speaker 1: suspicious hand signals, and the man in the khaki military
Speaker 1: shirt and the left and in front of cart Charlie
Speaker 1: was doing something coordinated as well. He had something rectangular
Speaker 1: under his left shirt sleeve and was doing a pully
Speaker 1: motion with his hands. Just before the shot was fired.
Speaker 1: There was possibly a sniper a wind in a window
Speaker 1: strategically facing Charlie from his right. All the hand signals
Speaker 1: and actions by these three men coordinated exactly timing with
Speaker 1: the first and fatal shot, which also has corresponded like
Speaker 1: a ballet with the words of the man at the microphone.
Speaker 1: The question itself may have been scripted.
Speaker 6: Absolutely, yeah, that's worth investigation.
Speaker 1: Previous videos, Charlie's team members always had their hands either
Speaker 1: clasped or folded on their sides, never any signaling. Well,
Speaker 1: we're going to get into that with I think I
Speaker 1: mentioned to you guys that we're going to have We're
Speaker 1: supposed to have Jason Goodman from from uh Crowdsource of Truth.
Speaker 1: I don't know if you guys, but his uh one
Speaker 1: of the things he put out today was Charlie Kirk
Speaker 1: Kirk was shot from behind. Proved me wrong.
Speaker 3: Hmm.
Speaker 6: Well, I don't think we can prove too much of anything.
Speaker 6: I mean, at this point, it sounds like a magic
Speaker 6: bullet type of situation where.
Speaker 1: Oh, you know, yeah, yeah, and and somebody and Honey
Speaker 1: West is also hearing uh exploding mike on his chest.
Speaker 6: Yeah. I've seen people say that, or the mic fire
Speaker 6: to project itself and I don't know about that, but
Speaker 6: his shirt did have some very funny movement. And I
Speaker 6: wouldn't put it past anybody. I mean, if they're out
Speaker 6: there blowing up organizations with pagers, I mean, who a microphone?
Speaker 6: You know what I'm saying.
Speaker 1: I guess as much of a leap. Is it much
Speaker 1: of a leap?
Speaker 6: It's not much of a leap. It's not much of
Speaker 6: a leap. And this comes on the heels of for
Speaker 6: years we've known that phones blow up, you know, like
Speaker 6: you're not even supposed to have. Remember they were like,
Speaker 6: don't bring the lithium batteries on the plane or you'll
Speaker 6: blow up, blow up the plane. You know.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we'll have to see what develops there. But are
Speaker 1: they so if I understand it correctly, the city council
Speaker 1: down there, are they still pushing this?
Speaker 3: Uh?
Speaker 1: I mean did they have? They've approved the the males
Speaker 1: into female's bathrooms.
Speaker 6: Right, yeah, and not enough people know and I'm sure
Speaker 6: it's sure no push I mean they don't know. You
Speaker 6: can't push back against what you don't know, right. So
Speaker 6: the first thing is the education part, and that's hard
Speaker 6: because you got to get that message out to everybody
Speaker 6: and it's easier said than done because it's expensive. So
Speaker 6: if they're not telling everybody what's going on, how are
Speaker 6: they supposed to know what's going on. So I'm out
Speaker 6: there bringing the alarm, letting people know that the fire
Speaker 6: is going on. It's terrible.
Speaker 1: I mean, how many schools are in downtown Rochester.
Speaker 6: Oh, you know, I don't know because they keep closing
Speaker 6: them because they're taken over by the state, because they're
Speaker 6: always in receivership. Because the schools are quality education is terrible.
Speaker 6: They don't have anybody graduating. That's a whole other problem
Speaker 6: that is not addressed. Like they just they just had
Speaker 6: a big issue and it's still ongoing where they didn't
Speaker 6: have thousands, there's like three thousand employees of the school
Speaker 6: district weren't paid. Yeah, right, Like where is the oversight?
Speaker 6: They said that even though it's been a month or
Speaker 6: two they've gotten most of it resolved, it's only like
Speaker 6: three hundred people who haven't been paid. I'm like, where's
Speaker 6: all the money going though, Like, couldn't you have cut checks?
Speaker 6: And somebody said, well, they would have to pay them
Speaker 6: in cash or whatever. I don't care how they pay them.
Speaker 6: They should be paying these people like it's teacher's salary.
Speaker 6: These people are largely salary. Why couldn't you pay the
Speaker 6: salary people their salary because you know how much salary
Speaker 6: that they get. Have I said salary enough times? Yeah,
Speaker 6: it's like it's crazy. And my whole take on that
Speaker 6: was I bet you that they lost the money, like
Speaker 6: the money was putting an investment vehicle and then they
Speaker 6: lost the money and they were just trying to wait
Speaker 6: for it to come back or switch funds from some
Speaker 6: discrete accountant, you know. But there's no Again, city council
Speaker 6: is supposed to be the oversight on that. They're not
Speaker 6: looking into that. There's nothing they haven't said boo on
Speaker 6: the whole situation.
Speaker 1: How are they doing? I mean, you know, is there
Speaker 1: is there anything they are doing? I mean besides taking.
Speaker 6: According to Mary Lupian, who is one of the people
Speaker 6: that just ran for mayor and is on city council,
Speaker 6: they're a legislative body that doesn't legislate, that's her words.
Speaker 6: And she's a leftist. So I mean you can get
Speaker 6: what do they say when somebody tells you who they are,
Speaker 6: believe them right, you know, I'm just like it's it's insane.
Speaker 6: They're not doing a thing. And this is what happens.
Speaker 2: You guys.
Speaker 6: You got to understand. You got to understand that when
Speaker 6: these socialists get in power, what happens is a lot
Speaker 6: of nothing. And what does happen is things that you
Speaker 6: don't want. They promise you things that sound good, that
Speaker 6: they that seem like they might be functional. Excuse me,
Speaker 6: if they ever materialize at all, that's a big thing.
Speaker 6: But when they do, even they don't work. They don't work.
Speaker 6: So they promise you these freebsies, handouts and everything. And
Speaker 6: then you wonder why all the costs of everything are
Speaker 6: going on. Why is electric going Yeah? Why yeah?
Speaker 1: Case on point. If man, ma'am, Donnie the you know,
Speaker 1: the mirror candidate for a New York New York City,
Speaker 1: if he gets in, there's a bunch of shit that
Speaker 1: he wants to do.
Speaker 6: He just got on the TV the other day and
Speaker 6: he said, oh, well, now we're gonna raise the state
Speaker 6: taxes on businesses to like twelve percent. Who flying monkey's
Speaker 6: uncle or you you understand what I'm saying. The paper
Speaker 6: your nonsense. I don't even live in New York City.
Speaker 6: I don't want you to tax my business more to state.
Speaker 6: New York State already taxes me enough. Are you crazy
Speaker 6: outside of us?
Speaker 12: You know?
Speaker 6: And he's like, well, Jersey is doing Jersey. Who's moving
Speaker 6: their businesses to Jersey? Explain it to me, like I'm five.
Speaker 1: Well, they're moving their their businesses right out.
Speaker 6: That's what I'm saying, Like, and I hate to say it,
Speaker 6: like this is a joke, but most of the people
Speaker 6: that I know in Jersey don't want to be in Jersey.
Speaker 1: You know, you know, I mean, as it pertains to Rochester,
Speaker 1: I mean, it amazes me the Genesee Beer is still downtown. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: after all this shit.
Speaker 6: It is it is, it's it's probably one of the
Speaker 6: last manufacturing hubs that we really have downtown. I'm trying
Speaker 6: to think of something else that's dound there. It's right
Speaker 6: by the old Bosham loam, right, and that's closed down,
Speaker 6: that's moved over to what is that Goodman? No, it's
Speaker 6: not Goodman, it's something else over there. But and I
Speaker 6: think that that one is largely empty now too. They
Speaker 6: moved a lot of the production away from the but
Speaker 6: we don't have a lot of manufacturing here again, but
Speaker 6: this is years of terrible policy, and it's been even
Speaker 6: hastened the more that they pushed these socialists and religious,
Speaker 6: atheistic type of ideals into our society and culture. That's
Speaker 6: not good for for our area.
Speaker 1: When you when you go from a vibrant U Xerox
Speaker 1: and Kodak two, you know, devastating actions on the board
Speaker 1: of those both both of those companies. You know, they
Speaker 1: they had technology that they didn't want to They didn't
Speaker 1: want to expand on because they figured everybody would continue
Speaker 1: buying film and pink buying photo paper. They didn't want to.
Speaker 1: So the Japanese got ahead of them with this digital stuff. Yeah, well,
Speaker 1: I mean they could have killed made a killing is well.
Speaker 6: They also had to patent for o led screens. So
Speaker 6: can we talk about that like that? Like how did
Speaker 6: you miss the bus on that one? So?
Speaker 1: Oh, they had that.
Speaker 6: My uncle told me that he worked at Kodak for years.
Speaker 6: He said, back in the sixties, they were powering their
Speaker 6: plants with plasma power. I said plasma, I said, we
Speaker 6: don't have plasma power. Now, what are you like? What like,
Speaker 6: what are we what's going on?
Speaker 13: You know?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: What the hell?
Speaker 6: That shows you? That shows you where we are?
Speaker 1: You know, Well, they were, they were satisfied. Just keep
Speaker 1: keep paying people, keep selling people. Uh you know, uh
Speaker 1: film roles and paper.
Speaker 3: To printed on.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they've got they got They got so comfortable with
Speaker 1: that that they killed themselves.
Speaker 6: Yeah. They got these little micro cameras right now that
Speaker 6: Kodak's trying to bring back is like a memory type
Speaker 6: of fast thing that they're trying to cook up. We'll
Speaker 6: see how it works. They were just facing some serious
Speaker 6: financial issues a couple of weeks ago. I don't know
Speaker 6: how that ever turned out. I haven't heard about that
Speaker 6: in the news lately. But again, the fact what businesses
Speaker 6: is we have to focus on innovation from within. We
Speaker 6: have to focus on small business. We have to focus
Speaker 6: on entrepreneurship. And that's the way you build a good
Speaker 6: a good economy locally.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, if you were to, I mean they
Speaker 1: kind of screwed up initially. I mean, you'd know more
Speaker 1: about this workers than I do. But basically, when they
Speaker 1: had the hurricane in Puerto Rico, you know, Rochester being
Speaker 1: a sanctuary city, said oh, you know, everybody from Puerto
Speaker 1: Rico come to Rochester. Yeah, you know, and you'll get
Speaker 1: social service services and everything under the sun. Those people
Speaker 1: take the jobs that are here. I mean, why don't
Speaker 1: you stay on your own island and rebuild it.
Speaker 6: Well, so I see this isn't this is another problem prioritization.
Speaker 6: Like they've got a big push for these illegal aliens here,
Speaker 6: like not even Puerto Ricans. And that's something I bring
Speaker 6: up all the time, like we got our own Hispanic
Speaker 6: people right here that you can help, you know. Yeah,
Speaker 6: but they're pushing all of this craziness where they're punching
Speaker 6: for illegal aliens. The illegal aliens get all of these
Speaker 6: free subsidies, all of these property grants and stuff like that,
Speaker 6: all of this housing.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So what are your thoughts on the government shutdown?
Speaker 6: I'm a big government shutdown person all the time, every year,
Speaker 6: shut it down. I want a complete budget. The government
Speaker 6: should not be opened back up until there is a
Speaker 6: complete budget. But with this one, I'm also not a
Speaker 6: fan of continuing resolutions. I'll tell you that now never
Speaker 6: no more continuing resolute. And the last thought there on
Speaker 6: that part is is the Democrats did this themselves. They functioned,
Speaker 6: They put in the function where the credits for the
Speaker 6: subsidies would expire right now. So they did this knowing
Speaker 6: long ahead of time what was going to happen, and
Speaker 6: they didn't want to adjust it or fix it. And
Speaker 6: then they've got a clean cr that they're trying to
Speaker 6: push through, which is an amazing thing, right because it
Speaker 6: doesn't have any extra horse punky in there. And they're like, no,
Speaker 6: we don't want to continue funding it unless you meet
Speaker 6: our demands.
Speaker 1: Well you're that money would go to the illegal alien Yes,
Speaker 1: medical medical thing right.
Speaker 6: Yes, that's what they want. They want the money for
Speaker 6: the illegal aliens medical stuff right back in there. Can
Speaker 6: you make that make sense to me? Like, no, go
Speaker 6: back to your country, guys, Like, we need to worry
Speaker 6: about our own country. No offense.
Speaker 1: Puerto Ricans and people of Puerto Rican descent and Mexican
Speaker 1: descent that did it the right way to get here.
Speaker 1: You don't like the illegals anymore.
Speaker 2: Not at all, not at all.
Speaker 6: They just have complete decis I wonder how.
Speaker 1: Many jobs at what's the name of that place that
Speaker 1: make suits downtownik.
Speaker 6: Yeah, yeah, Hicky Freeman. Yeah, they they moved like last year,
Speaker 6: they moved for hundred and something years.
Speaker 1: Craziness. I mean they used to have that sale once
Speaker 1: a year where you know, everything would be like down
Speaker 1: a thousand percent or something, and we got a uh,
Speaker 1: we got a kind of Cubans are also mostly conservative.
Speaker 6: It's true, you know, but that's also why they focused
Speaker 6: on bringing in all of these people from all of
Speaker 6: these other different countries, not so much the conservative countries
Speaker 6: or the family oriented countries. So that's a whole other thing.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so we're going to uh, you know, we're we're
Speaker 1: we're approaching the break so I want to but we
Speaker 1: should have we should have Jason Goodman with us, so
Speaker 1: that should be very interesting, you know, because he picks
Speaker 1: that part. I think he is a video uh to
Speaker 1: some degree of video expert. I mean, that's his profession,
Speaker 1: so it'll get his uh, it'll be interesting to get
Speaker 1: his uh outlook on it with any any uh does
Speaker 1: a lot, I think with that guy by the name
Speaker 1: of Colin who does reconstructions nice you know, so we'll see.
Speaker 1: We just got a note from the uh from Dottie's
Speaker 1: Sandusky by the way, from h from the breaking news
Speaker 1: that we had on on on Monday, and she said
Speaker 1: I just finished her watching your podcast from Monday regarding
Speaker 1: the baking breaking news and she says, thank you so much.
Speaker 1: But the other question she had a question maybe we
Speaker 1: could answer. Do you know why it's Center County has
Speaker 1: not posted anything at all about the pc R A. Yes,
Speaker 1: because they don't want to. They don't address it. That's
Speaker 1: why they don't want to answer the facts. So we've
Speaker 1: got to take a break. We'll be right back. Okay,
Speaker 1: so we're back. I'll just tell you we've got so far.
Speaker 1: We've got our Tennessee correspondent, Greg Islands, a veteran n
Speaker 1: ci A Special Agent. And we've got Marcus C. Williams,
Speaker 1: who is fighting socialists in Western New York this uh,
Speaker 1: and I'm Johnson, a veteran n c i S Special Religion.
Speaker 1: We have a special guest this week that are this hour.
Speaker 1: That is incredible. I mean, if you've ever seen crowded
Speaker 1: crowd source the truth, Uh, it's incredible. He does not
Speaker 1: only uh, reporting from the from the streets of the
Speaker 1: New York City, but he's had some incredible guests. And
Speaker 1: he also has this thing I think it's called that
Speaker 1: We'll have to ask him. It's Evenings with Charles. I
Speaker 1: think anyway, their mind blowing series of of videos and
Speaker 1: I think he has an expertise in video and technology,
Speaker 1: So that'll be uh a breath of fresh air at us,
Speaker 1: which we don't we don't have handle lot of technology. Great, Bill,
Speaker 1: could you bring Jason up? Jason, thank you very much
Speaker 1: for van here. Appreciate inviting me, and we been glued
Speaker 1: to everything that you do. Those and those New York
Speaker 1: City street walks are just incredible.
Speaker 2: Thank you very much.
Speaker 1: You're doing awesome job. And you also have you interviewed
Speaker 1: Charles right in the evenings? Oh yes, last name? Can
Speaker 1: we see?
Speaker 2: The Ortel Sunday with Charles? Is the show that I
Speaker 2: do with Charles Ortel. And he is a very renowned
Speaker 2: and respected financial investor. And I mean he's one of
Speaker 2: these guys who retired at forty one after doing multiple
Speaker 2: billion dollar deals and now just for his own entertainment,
Speaker 2: he's become a complex fraud investigator. And he really broke
Speaker 2: a lot of news on the Clinton Foundation and revealed
Speaker 2: the financial frauds of the Clintons.
Speaker 1: Whoa wow. So he travels the planet, right, I mean
Speaker 1: every time you have an interview with him, he's in
Speaker 1: another country.
Speaker 2: Right. Yeah. You know, my mother used to say, rich
Speaker 2: or poor, it's nice to have money, and that's just it.
Speaker 2: Charles is a world traveler. He you know, after COVID
Speaker 2: and anticipation of what's imminent here in New York City,
Speaker 2: the Socialists, Communist, insane, probable next mayor Charles left. He
Speaker 2: like me, was born and raised in New York and
Speaker 2: he just look, he's very good at looking at market
Speaker 2: indications and knowing what is likely to happen. And he
Speaker 2: now lives in Malaysia, but he does travel quite extensively.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, you guys, do yourself a favor. If
Speaker 1: you're an audience ever, do yourself favor and watch those
Speaker 1: because they're very enlightening.
Speaker 2: Thank you.
Speaker 1: I mean, there are things that you guys touch on
Speaker 1: that people don't even think of that would be very
Speaker 1: antip very advantageous, advantageous to look at. I know we
Speaker 1: had ah, we've had at least one guest, uh mutual
Speaker 1: guests before and I know, uh, it probably went the
Speaker 1: same way with you Adasa Fleinberg.
Speaker 2: Oh boy, I think she's out of her mind.
Speaker 1: Uh yeah, well you know the the uh about Butler,
Speaker 1: about Butler, right right, yeah, Okay, so you've had a
Speaker 1: lot of excellent content. I mean we were just glued
Speaker 1: to it and I'm sure other people are as well,
Speaker 1: but uh, I just wanted to recently you put out
Speaker 1: a couple of things and and good for you. Charlie
Speaker 1: Kirk was shot from behind. Proved me wrong. Yeah, and
Speaker 1: this is uh now you have too you have Twitter
Speaker 1: to Twitter accounts, you have Jason Goodman, New York City, NYC, right,
Speaker 1: and then you have crowdsource the truth right right, So
Speaker 1: you know, if you get a chance to see his
Speaker 1: uh his Twitter page at those two addresses, you know
Speaker 1: that'd be terrific. But but this says when this first
Speaker 1: came up, I am John Collin said it was a bug.
Speaker 1: That's doctor that thinks he saw the case be sound
Speaker 1: and tell him the shot came from the front. But
Speaker 1: here are three frames from a video that show five
Speaker 1: hundred feet per second projectile about to kill Charlie Kirk.
Speaker 1: Just so, what's your That's obviously a big deal. And
Speaker 1: I know Marcus, as a strong conservative in Western New York,
Speaker 1: has had a lot of dealings with Charlie Kirk. You know,
Speaker 1: before is before the assassination. What can you tell us
Speaker 1: what your thoughts are in regard to Charlie Kirk Now
Speaker 1: that you have had a chance to take a look
Speaker 1: at a couple of things.
Speaker 2: Sure, and I'd love to explain that tweet to you guys,
Speaker 2: because it is quite confusing how this evidence has come about,
Speaker 2: and it requires a basic explanation of how video compression works.
Speaker 2: And it goes to some of my background, which again,
Speaker 2: thank you for that really kind introduction, just to let
Speaker 2: everybody know how I'm qualified to talk about this. Before
Speaker 2: I started Crowdsource the Truth and got into independent journalism,
Speaker 2: I had a long career as a visual effects cinematographer
Speaker 2: and I worked in Hollywood. I was specialized in stereoscopic
Speaker 2: three D where you put on the glasses and go
Speaker 2: to the movies and everything is coming out at you
Speaker 2: off the screen. So I've invented camera systems and I've
Speaker 2: developed optical systems, some of which have become international standards
Speaker 2: in motion picture production, first stereoscopic motion pictures. And at
Speaker 2: the height of my career, I was hired by clients
Speaker 2: like Disney and Sony and Universal Pictures to tell companies
Speaker 2: like Imax and Technicolor and Photo Kim what they didn't
Speaker 2: know about digital imaging. Because remember all of those companies
Speaker 2: started out and have a long history in celluloid cinema,
Speaker 2: mechanical aspects of that type of technology, And of course
Speaker 2: we're talking about years ago, So I don't mean to
Speaker 2: disparage any of these companies, and there's a lot of
Speaker 2: people who have this knowledge, but I've been doing it
Speaker 2: for many, many years since a very young age.
Speaker 1: I've been working in.
Speaker 2: Digital imaging since I was about thirteen, got my first computer,
Speaker 2: and the first version of Adobe Photoshop that I used
Speaker 2: was one point oh seven. So I've got a lot
Speaker 2: of knowledge when it comes to digital imaging and image
Speaker 2: compression and video compression. And the reason why this is
Speaker 2: important to what we're going to talk about is I
Speaker 2: don't have extensive knowledge at all in firearms and ballistics
Speaker 2: and things like that. But of course the experts who
Speaker 2: are evaluating this stuff, the ballistics, etc. They're doing it
Speaker 2: through this blurry film pardon the punt of digital images
Speaker 2: that we're getting off of the Internet. And so if
Speaker 2: we don't account for anomalies and artifacts that these digital
Speaker 2: compression technologies can and do introduce, we might be making
Speaker 2: judgments that are sort of fundamentally incorrect. So, if I may,
Speaker 2: I'd like to share my screen with you here. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I don't know if you have the ability to go
Speaker 2: full screen on that, but I'll explain how I arrived
Speaker 2: at this. Let's call it a hypothesis because I don't
Speaker 2: like to make conclusions this early in the investigation. But
Speaker 2: people can go to my Twitter account, my ex account,
Speaker 2: and as you rightly said, I do have two of them.
Speaker 2: That is not intended to confuse people, or at least
Speaker 2: not by me. But through the years I've been so
Speaker 2: banned and suppressed and kicked off and had to start
Speaker 2: new accounts and all this kind of stuff. So we're
Speaker 2: looking right now at my JG Underscore CSTT like Jason
Speaker 2: Goodman Crowdsource the Truth. And so this is a composite
Speaker 2: image that I created using three frames from two separate
Speaker 2: videos of the same thing. I think you guys are
Speaker 2: probably familiar with Zeb Boykin. Zeb is a marine sniper
Speaker 2: and he's got a lot of experience in ballistics. I've
Speaker 2: just met him two or three weeks ago. He was
Speaker 2: going viral with his analysis and the videos that he
Speaker 2: was doing on YouTube about the Charlie Kirk assassination, and
Speaker 2: I found him to be very insightful. A lot of
Speaker 2: people obviously did he had huge response to his videos,
Speaker 2: so I started communicating with him, and then he appeared
Speaker 2: on Owen Schreyer's show and he showed this video and
Speaker 2: Owen had the same reaction that I had. He immediately said,
Speaker 2: oh wow, that looks much higher quality, sharper, etc. Than
Speaker 2: many of the other videos that we've seen from this
Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk assassination. And I was in communication with Zeb,
Speaker 2: so I asked him about it, and he was kind
Speaker 2: enough to provide me with the video, and sure enough,
Speaker 2: it is high resolution and it does display less compression
Speaker 2: artifacts than a lot of the other videos that we've seen.
Speaker 2: But I started to kind of interrogate the video from
Speaker 2: a forensic standpoint, and I noticed certain things about it. Now,
Speaker 2: even if you're not a video professional, you've probably made
Speaker 2: videos on your phone and you download them to compute
Speaker 2: to the computer. And let's say you're using an iPhone
Speaker 2: and a Mac. You know that when you put the
Speaker 2: video on your phone and on your computer, excuse me,
Speaker 2: and just double click on that file. You have a
Speaker 2: domov a movie file that automatically opens in a quick
Speaker 2: time player and you're watching the video, no problem. When
Speaker 2: I got this video from Zeb, I noticed right away
Speaker 2: that it didn't behave that way. Double clicking on it
Speaker 2: did not automatically open it. Now, this was an MP
Speaker 2: four file, which is an MPEG four movie, but also
Speaker 2: it should open with a simple double click, and it
Speaker 2: did not. So I began looking into it with some
Speaker 2: tools that allow me to analyze metadata of a video
Speaker 2: and things like that, and I discovered that it was
Speaker 2: an MPEG transport stream, which is a little bit more
Speaker 2: of like a broadcast format, and it's not something that's
Speaker 2: generally easily created on your phone or your laptop computer
Speaker 2: if you're a casual user. It's just not the type
Speaker 2: of format that the average person would use. Also noticed
Speaker 2: that it had a frame rate of twenty frames per second.
Speaker 2: Now this was very unusual because phones and most normal
Speaker 2: cameras in the United States of America are making videos
Speaker 2: at thirty frames per second. And if you guys do
Speaker 2: a lot of online analysis of ballistics research, you're going
Speaker 2: to be familiar with some of these high speed cameras
Speaker 2: that nowadays can go up to two million, even twenty
Speaker 2: million frames per second. So photographing ballistic events and high
Speaker 2: speed events at ten one hundred thousand frames per second,
Speaker 2: it's pretty commonly done if people have the expense of equipment,
Speaker 2: you can see every reaction of the bullet and the
Speaker 2: ballistic gel and all that kind of stuff. But a
Speaker 2: twenty frame per second video, it was just so unusual
Speaker 2: to me that I really began to wonder how it
Speaker 2: got to be that way, And so I started talking
Speaker 2: to Zem about this on some of the live streams
Speaker 2: we were doing together, and then, almost as if in
Speaker 2: response to my inquiz position, we got another version of
Speaker 2: this video that was thirty frames per second, and I said, well,
Speaker 2: that's interesting. It's almost as if someone is trying to
Speaker 2: counteract our questions with, oh, here's the original video. But
Speaker 2: here's the weird thing. The way you would get a
Speaker 2: twenty frame per second video from a thirty frame per
Speaker 2: second original, there's only a limited number of ways you
Speaker 2: can do that. You could slow it down so that
Speaker 2: everything would play at a slower rate, but that would
Speaker 2: be obvious, the sound would be weird, the motion would
Speaker 2: look odd. Oh you didn't do that. The other thing
Speaker 2: you could do is you could drop ten frames per second,
Speaker 2: but that would make your motion very stuttery and also
Speaker 2: would look unnatural. And the third way it could be
Speaker 2: done is through a complex visual effects process called optical flow.
Speaker 2: But none of these things were evident in this file.
Speaker 2: It looked like an otherwise normal video, but it was
Speaker 2: playing at twenty frames per second. And the really weird
Speaker 2: thing is the thirty frame per second video also played normally,
Speaker 2: and they were the same duration, they had the same
Speaker 2: action in them. It was a difficult problem to figure out,
Speaker 2: so I began to say to myself, well, gee, you know,
Speaker 2: both of these videos must have come from an original
Speaker 2: whose frame rate is evenly divisible by both twenty and thirty,
Speaker 2: because we don't have any motion artifacts in the output videos.
Speaker 2: So that could be a sixty frame per second video.
Speaker 2: That could be a one hundred and twenty frame per
Speaker 2: second video, or it could be a two hundred and
Speaker 2: forty frame per second video. Each of those are evenly
Speaker 2: divisible by both twenty and thirty. And I pretty quickly
Speaker 2: arrived at the assessment that it came from a two
Speaker 2: hundred and forty frame per second video. And the way
Speaker 2: I arrived at that was with these three dots. Now
Speaker 2: we know I'm not a math expert by a long shot,
Speaker 2: but I know that three points make a line. In
Speaker 2: this line it's headed basically directly for Charlie Kirk's head,
Speaker 2: kind of just above the base of his skull. Now
Speaker 2: I'm going to switch to a different view here. This
Speaker 2: is another application. I've got the original twenty frame per
Speaker 2: second video loaded up here and you can see here
Speaker 2: this is the middle This is the middle position of
Speaker 2: this item that's headed towards Charlie. I'm going to show
Speaker 2: you the next frame in this twenty frame per second video.
Speaker 2: Is that? And what's happened here is the projectile eiele
Speaker 2: edge has penetrated his neck from the back, probably at
Speaker 2: the base of his skull. It's deflected downward about nineteen degrees,
Speaker 2: probably off the skull bone itself, and it's popped out
Speaker 2: the front of his neck. Everybody saw that grisly wound. Yeah,
Speaker 2: people disagree if it's an entry wound or an exit wound.
Speaker 2: And it's certainly not a thirty odd to six rifle
Speaker 2: round that would have exploded his neck by every estimation.
Speaker 2: But this appears to be an exit wound. And what's
Speaker 2: happened is it's come out the front of his throat
Speaker 2: after deflecting downward off the base of his skull and
Speaker 2: it's a projectile that's been fired at I believe five
Speaker 2: hundred feet per second, which would comport with the muzzle
Speaker 2: velocity of a air pistol manufactured by B and W
Speaker 2: called the M fifty, or it could be another similar
Speaker 2: air pistol, but there is an air pistol that can
Speaker 2: launch projectiles of various caliber at five hundred feet per second.
Speaker 2: And I'll explain how I arrived at that muzzle velocity
Speaker 2: in a moment. But what appears to be happening here
Speaker 2: is it's penetrated the back of his neck below his
Speaker 2: skull near his right ear, come out the front of
Speaker 2: his throat, and it's lost so much of its kinetic
Speaker 2: energy by penetrating his flesh that it hits his collar
Speaker 2: and it's caught in the shirt like a net, and
Speaker 2: it's caught right there. That's why we have this sort
Speaker 2: of acute pinching and upward pulling of the shirt. We
Speaker 2: go to the next frame and there's some more activity
Speaker 2: in his shirt that in my view, seems to indicate
Speaker 2: let me back up here. We could see there's some
Speaker 2: activity down the front of the shirt that seems to
Speaker 2: look like this projectile has now fallen down the front
Speaker 2: of the shirt. He's hit, it's caught, it goes down
Speaker 2: the front of the shirt. The shirt is agitated, it's
Speaker 2: moving around. And now I'm not going to play the
Speaker 2: part where he starts to bleed, but fractions of a
Speaker 2: second later, Charlie is fatally injured there and he starts
Speaker 2: to bleed.
Speaker 1: Wow.
Speaker 2: So let me just quickly address how I arrived at
Speaker 2: five hundred feet per second, and this will hopefully explain everything.
Speaker 2: So again, we've got these three dots. And by the way,
Speaker 2: this first one and this second one came from the
Speaker 2: twenty frame per second video. This third one came from
Speaker 2: the thirty frame per second video. And now, remember we
Speaker 2: said at the top of this discussion that the original
Speaker 2: must be must have been based on what we're seeing
Speaker 2: in these two output videos. The original must have been
Speaker 2: evenly divisible by both twenty and thirty. So if we
Speaker 2: start with a two hundred and forty frame per second video,
Speaker 2: divide that by twelve, we get twenty frames per second.
Speaker 2: We're going to do that by taking the first frame
Speaker 2: of every two hundred and forty frame sequence, and that's
Speaker 2: going to give us that even moving motion. One out
Speaker 2: of every twelve frames in the video. To make the
Speaker 2: thirty frame per second video, we divide by eight. Two
Speaker 2: hundred and forty divided by eight is thirty. We take
Speaker 2: the first of every eight frame sequence to make our
Speaker 2: thirty frame per second video, and so that results in
Speaker 2: two videos comprised of two sets of different frames. So
Speaker 2: I was able to get the final projectile position from
Speaker 2: the thirty frame per second video and these other two
Speaker 2: from the twenty frame per second video, and the other
Speaker 2: thing that informs me that it's two hundred and forty
Speaker 2: frames per second. While it would be pretty complicated and
Speaker 2: certainly beyond my mathematical abilities to actually measure what is
Speaker 2: going on in this two dimensional video of something flying
Speaker 2: through the air where we don't know the focal length
Speaker 2: of the lens or the distance at which this was photographed,
Speaker 2: I've put down here this sort of arbitrary scale that
Speaker 2: just shows us units in this frame. And the thing
Speaker 2: that's interesting about it is whether this is feet, inches, microns, miles,
Speaker 2: whatever it is, the distance between the projectile from frame
Speaker 2: to frame is very close to equidistant, meaning it's traveling
Speaker 2: at a consistent rate. Now, the other thing is, while
Speaker 2: we can't accurately measure. We do know that Charlie Kirk
Speaker 2: was six foot four and he's seated here, he's kind
Speaker 2: of slouching. So we're looking at approximately three feet of
Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk's body from seat to skull top here. And
Speaker 2: when I asked shat GPT, if a projectile were launched
Speaker 2: at five hundred feet per second and photographed at two
Speaker 2: hundred forty frames per second, what distance would the object
Speaker 2: travel in one two hundred and fortieth of a second.
Speaker 2: And the answer was two point zero eight feet. So,
Speaker 2: given that we're looking at about three feet of Kirrent,
Speaker 2: this show looks like two to two and a half
Speaker 2: feet between these things to me. And so this is
Speaker 2: how I arrived at this hypothesis. Yeah, what do you
Speaker 2: guys say?
Speaker 1: That's very interesting? Jason, and Greg, who is a retired
Speaker 1: or a veteran NCIS special agent, was before that was
Speaker 1: a fast marine and he has had and he sold
Speaker 1: us a lot of competitions. So Greg, what do you
Speaker 1: think about that?
Speaker 4: Yeah? I never I like it. It sounds very reasonable.
Speaker 4: It's actually one out of everything I've heard so far.
Speaker 4: I think that's pretty damn scientific. I followed you with
Speaker 4: I've played a little bit with the video stuff and
Speaker 4: edit with the Adobe Premier package, so I can kind
Speaker 4: of understand and follow what you're doing. I'm not a
Speaker 4: real big math guy. I have done some reloading over
Speaker 4: the years. Specifically I reload for three h eight Winchester,
Speaker 4: and I know the amount of grains everything I use,
Speaker 4: and I know how fast that round travels is around
Speaker 4: three thousand feet per second. At thirty odd six would
Speaker 4: be similar. It would travelers somewhere probably twenty eight to
Speaker 4: three thousand feet per second. And I totally agree with
Speaker 4: you that a thirty odd six round when it completely separated,
Speaker 4: there have been nothing left of the neck. So, but
Speaker 4: I had never considered a air an air rifle which
Speaker 4: they now use for hunting, and I do hunt so
Speaker 4: and they will take down big game. The only thing
Speaker 4: that in acoustics a liar. I know that acoustics are
Speaker 4: a liar. You can't base any judgment off acoustics. I
Speaker 4: know the video when when we first played the video
Speaker 4: that we had because we were live when the show happened,
Speaker 4: I thought, initially maybe it sounded like a handgun round.
Speaker 4: A you know, I knew it had to be bigger
Speaker 4: than a twenty two, but I didn't quite But then
Speaker 4: we had another angle later on and it sounded it
Speaker 4: sounded more like a rifle round. So I don't know
Speaker 4: about the acoustics, and I know that the acoustics are
Speaker 4: a liar, so I don't I don't really consider that much,
Speaker 4: but I do. And I don't know a lot about
Speaker 4: the the air rifles, but I do know that they
Speaker 4: use them for game now, so totally totally plausible.
Speaker 2: Let me address the acoustic question for me. Sorry, I'm
Speaker 2: starting in through up, but let's first address the acoustic question.
Speaker 2: I should have said this. I don't mean to say
Speaker 2: that this hypothesis eliminates it's it's clear a rifle of
Speaker 2: some type was fire and there's a lot of reasons
Speaker 2: why that would have been done. I don't think it
Speaker 2: hit Charlie Kirk at all. The rifle eye alledge would
Speaker 2: have been fired either directly over the entire campus or
Speaker 2: directly into the dirt. And the reason is for exactly
Speaker 2: what Greg said. Whoever perpetrated this knows that there's going
Speaker 2: to be people out there who have sophistic acoustic analysis
Speaker 2: software and can do these crack thump acoustic triangulation calculations
Speaker 2: to locate where the shot is coming from. Additionally, you
Speaker 2: knew you were going to have thousands of eyewitnesses. You
Speaker 2: want to distract everybody. Bang a rifle goes off behind you,
Speaker 2: You're going to pay attention to that, and that has
Speaker 2: shock value to you. So here's one of the things
Speaker 2: that I think you guys can help me understand. Because
Speaker 2: this is an allegation and a theory, I don't mean
Speaker 2: to implicate this company or this product, And to reiterate,
Speaker 2: I'm not saying that this company had anything to do
Speaker 2: with this at all. I'm just pointing to this as
Speaker 2: a demonstration of a technology that exists. This is something
Speaker 2: made by a company called Digital Trigger Technologies that anybody
Speaker 2: can purchase for six hundred and fifty nine bucks. This
Speaker 2: is an item called Digital Digit Trigger two point two.
Speaker 2: And I'm sure you guys will understand much more than
Speaker 2: I do exactly what it's intended to do. But I've
Speaker 2: watched a number of videos made by this company and
Speaker 2: the guy who invented it, and what I've learned from
Speaker 2: that is this is an AR style trigger that you
Speaker 2: replace on your gun and inside the handle here it
Speaker 2: has a digital component that you can program through USB
Speaker 2: or whatever, and it has different modes. So if you
Speaker 2: want to do sniper shooting, you can program it for
Speaker 2: like a light touch trigger or whatever it is that
Speaker 2: a sniper is trying to do. If you want one
Speaker 2: trigger pull to fire two bullets, you can do that.
Speaker 2: The guy even says you can program it for rapid
Speaker 2: fire and continuous fire, but you have to follow the
Speaker 2: law within your state. So again, I don't need to
Speaker 2: be a gun expert or a bullet expert, but I
Speaker 2: do know from my visual effects work, if we have
Speaker 2: a trigger that can digital digitally actuate something, we can
Speaker 2: synchronize multiple digital triggers to be activated simultaneously. And so
Speaker 2: I further alleged that whoever fired the air rifle had
Speaker 2: a similar type of digital trigger technology that would have
Speaker 2: been through Wi Fi or radio or some sort of
Speaker 2: wireless communication be synchronized with the rifle on the roof,
Speaker 2: so that when one gun was fired, both fired simultaneously.
Speaker 1: That yes, my boy, that makes that makes a lot
Speaker 1: of sense. How how far do you think behind him,
Speaker 1: the uh the shooter would have been when we look.
Speaker 2: It's difficult, it's difficult to say, and I'm I'm absolutely
Speaker 2: willing to speculate about things when we have enough evidence,
Speaker 2: but I want to make it clear that I'm speculating
Speaker 2: about this. I don't have the same level of, you know,
Speaker 2: mathematical certainty as far as where the person would have
Speaker 2: been shooting. But we see that Charlie Kirk, He's seated
Speaker 2: in a tent that is located on campus, sort of
Speaker 2: right in front of this tunnel overpass. People could see
Speaker 2: this woman with the forty seven hat. Charlie's tent is
Speaker 2: right here. So we're on the opposite side of the
Speaker 2: tunnel looking in towards where Charlie is, and I noticed
Speaker 2: that there is this perch where and again I'm not
Speaker 2: suggesting that this person oops, I'm not suggesting that that
Speaker 2: person standing there is the shooter. I'm just noticing that
Speaker 2: he's standing there, and it's possible we'd have to go
Speaker 2: there and evaluate the angle, but it's possible that this
Speaker 2: location could get the angle to shoot him just under
Speaker 2: the right ear or at the base of the skull.
Speaker 2: And it's strange to me that this guy is standing there.
Speaker 2: I don't know who this is, but people on the
Speaker 2: internet have said that this is the very same person
Speaker 2: who removed the SD card from the camera that was
Speaker 2: situated right behind you, Charlie Kirk. Oh my god, there's
Speaker 2: one other interesting thing about the camera. Just one last
Speaker 2: thing I want to drop on you guys about this.
Speaker 2: So a lot of people saw this research that I'm
Speaker 2: sharing with you guys right now, and they said, oh,
Speaker 2: Jason says the camera behind Charlie Kirk shot him. And
Speaker 2: to be clear, that's not what I'm saying, because when
Speaker 2: we go back to this photo, we can see here's
Speaker 2: the camera and its lens, and we can see that
Speaker 2: the angle the trajectory from that camera does not line
Speaker 2: up with the trajectory of the bullet. And this is
Speaker 2: another very interesting thing because I think what this camera
Speaker 2: would have been used for this is a targeting assistant.
Speaker 2: So even if the shooter is on the other side
Speaker 2: of that tunnel and can't really see the back of
Speaker 2: Charlie's head, they could have a Wi Fi feed from
Speaker 2: this camera. And there's certain products and software that allow
Speaker 2: you to put like a downrage camera close to the target,
Speaker 2: far from the shooter, and then looking at an iPad
Speaker 2: or a phone, you can see the target very clearly
Speaker 2: on the screen. And it has all kinds of aiming
Speaker 2: assistance stuff, so it's like a remote targeting system. It's
Speaker 2: incredibly complicated. If what I'm seeing is correct.
Speaker 1: Yeah, quick, quick question, very interesting. Yeah, go ahead, Mark.
Speaker 6: Did you see the video online where they're like, oh,
Speaker 6: it was a shellcasing that fell from where the back
Speaker 6: of the thing is. Something did fall from that area.
Speaker 6: What do you surmise that might have been.
Speaker 2: I haven't examined that closely, but people who I was
Speaker 2: looking at comments from that post. They said, it doesn't
Speaker 2: line up with the timing of the shot, and I
Speaker 2: think that it could have been anything. It's the clip
Speaker 2: that I saw of that was very zoomed in on
Speaker 2: that event. And one thing that I observe in general
Speaker 2: is that a lot of people like to, you know,
Speaker 2: in order to make their point, they like to screen
Speaker 2: capture elements of videos and crop them and go in
Speaker 2: whatever and anytime anybody sees that you should immediately go
Speaker 2: to the original source video that it came from, because
Speaker 2: just like I'm describing how these frame rates can be manipulated,
Speaker 2: this becomes editing and it goes back to my days
Speaker 2: in visual effects when you're trying to convince someone of
Speaker 2: an action in video. There's all kinds of editing tricks
Speaker 2: that you can use, and it becomes like a magic trick.
Speaker 2: I show you something falling down and I say, ooh,
Speaker 2: this fell down from the back of the tent. It
Speaker 2: must be a bullet casing. I don't think it is
Speaker 2: me and there Wow.
Speaker 1: Well, Jason, I mean not to get off the subject,
Speaker 1: but I can think of a million body cams that
Speaker 1: we've looked at that with your expertise, we could really
Speaker 1: beat the hell out of that Jesus Man.
Speaker 2: Yes, so I'm happy to join you guys and do
Speaker 2: that anytime. I did a lot of analysis of police
Speaker 2: body cams for the Butler assassination attempt, and I even
Speaker 2: identified what I believe I had proven was a rangefinder
Speaker 2: or some other kind of infrared laser inside the American
Speaker 2: Glass Research Building behind a window at the precise instant
Speaker 2: that Trump was shot.
Speaker 1: I remember that. Oh my god, if you guys are
Speaker 1: not watching across course The Truth and Jason Goodman NYC,
Speaker 1: you're missing out. I mean, the guy does a hell
Speaker 1: of a job putting this together and can explain it
Speaker 1: to somebody that got a uh, you know, a C
Speaker 1: and h or A D and Matt you.
Speaker 2: Know what I mean.
Speaker 1: But I got to see it really incredible. Thank you, Greg.
Speaker 1: What are your thoughts on that? I have never seen
Speaker 1: the digit trigger that he was talking about.
Speaker 4: Yeah, so I could track you on the video analysis
Speaker 4: the and the trigger. I'm very familiar with what they
Speaker 4: are fifteen triggers. I've actually put a few in more
Speaker 4: familiar with the two stage trigger, which has to deal
Speaker 4: with the cycling process of the whole mechanism of releasing
Speaker 4: the hammer to hit the bolt and the firing pin
Speaker 4: that starts the whole cycle of the rifle. I don't
Speaker 4: understand what the digit trigger would do. How can you
Speaker 4: explain that?
Speaker 2: Well, I mean again, I think probably my knowledge of
Speaker 2: what triggers do and how they work is insufficient to
Speaker 2: speak to you about that. But just from watching the
Speaker 2: videos of the guy who invented it, and it's you
Speaker 2: can program it to do all kinds of different things.
Speaker 2: It's designed to be customizable, so you could even pull
Speaker 2: the trigger on the gun and program it so two
Speaker 2: seconds later it fires. Or it's my understanding that when
Speaker 2: you're doing really long range sniper shooting, even if you
Speaker 2: wiggle your finger a little bit or you pull the
Speaker 2: trigger a certain way like that affects the accuracy of
Speaker 2: the shot. So I think what it lets you do
Speaker 2: is for the sniper setting it somehow lets you know,
Speaker 2: pull the trigger and have some other way of actually
Speaker 2: firing the gun so that your physical motion of pulling
Speaker 2: the trigger isn't happening coincident with the actual firing, so
Speaker 2: that you can be super duper steady, And it almost
Speaker 2: makes it like pulling the trigger. The physical trigger is
Speaker 2: like another safety on the gun, and it doesn't actually
Speaker 2: fire until the digital signal tells it to fire.
Speaker 6: So in theory, you're saying that this could have been
Speaker 6: done in concert by essentially one individual.
Speaker 2: Well, I think there were a number of individuals involved,
Speaker 2: but essentially what you're saying is correct. In other words,
Speaker 2: if you were let's say, out in the field and
Speaker 2: I'm up in a tree or something like that, and
Speaker 2: we're both aiming at the same target, and then you're
Speaker 2: on the radio to me and I say, okay, Marcus,
Speaker 2: I have the laser on the target, and I've physically
Speaker 2: pulled my trigger. The safety on my gun is released
Speaker 2: and its digital trigger is waiting for a signal from you.
Speaker 2: You have the master trigger and when you pull both guns.
Speaker 6: Fire guns fire yep, yep.
Speaker 1: Okay, So Jason, can I ask we got you know,
Speaker 1: we broadcast on link in two as well as rumble
Speaker 1: and stuff, but we got this interesting comment and I
Speaker 1: want to run it by and see what you think.
Speaker 1: It says. As you've probably seen, the two men around
Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk were doing suspicious hand signals, and the man
Speaker 1: in the Khanki military shirt on the left on and
Speaker 1: in front of Charlie was doing something coordinated as well.
Speaker 1: He had something rectangular under his left shirt sleeve and
Speaker 1: was doing at pooley motion with his right hand with
Speaker 1: his hands. Just before where the shot was fired, there
Speaker 1: was probably possibly a sniper in a window strategically facing
Speaker 1: Charlie from his right. But it could be that, you
Speaker 1: know what I'm saying, all the hand signals and actions
Speaker 1: by these three men coordinated exactly timing with the first
Speaker 1: and fatal shot, which also corresponded like a ballet with
Speaker 1: the words of the man at the microphone, the question
Speaker 1: itself maybe have been scripted as a countdown.
Speaker 2: I agree in pot.
Speaker 1: And she says in previous videos, Charlie's team members always
Speaker 1: had their hands either clasped claps clasped, excuse me, and
Speaker 1: folded or on their sides.
Speaker 6: So we heard of anybody getting a hold of the
Speaker 6: person that asks the question.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, that guy's been interviewed by Channel five, which
Speaker 2: is Andrew Callahan. I think his name is the same
Speaker 2: guy that interviewed Hunter Biden about all kinds of crazy
Speaker 2: about how great crack is. I don't know if you
Speaker 2: guys heard that interview, but that guy somehow got a
Speaker 2: hold of Hunter Callahan. And also there's this left wing
Speaker 2: crazy person who goes by the name of Destiny, which
Speaker 2: sounds like a strip to me, but this is some
Speaker 2: kind of video gamer guy or something, and so he
Speaker 2: is doing kind of like a Charlie Kirk mockery tour
Speaker 2: where he goes around and does the same debate style,
Speaker 2: but he takes the jackass position and he is that's
Speaker 2: called un f America. Obviously they spell it out, but
Speaker 2: if people google that and look up that, I don't
Speaker 2: know if you guys are down with swearing on the channel,
Speaker 2: but the America. So he's got the Unfuck America tour,
Speaker 2: And if you look that up. First of all, when
Speaker 2: you buy tickets for that your money is going to
Speaker 2: Act Blue, which is I allege and I legally organized
Speaker 2: five OHO one C three five oh one C four
Speaker 2: nonprofit corporation. That's conflating political activity with public nonprofit activity
Speaker 2: in a way that is against the law as far
Speaker 2: as I can tell. But in addition to that, that
Speaker 2: kid asking the question about how many transgender shooters there
Speaker 2: are Hunter Kozak I think his name is. He's on
Speaker 2: tour with this guy Destiny, doing this antagonistic anti Charlie Kirk,
Speaker 2: anti right wing kind of thing. So I agree that
Speaker 2: kid is very suspicious. But to go back to the
Speaker 2: question from the viewer, I agree that the security team
Speaker 2: is acting very suspiciously. That's my pure opinion. And by
Speaker 2: the way, the things that I say don't reflect any
Speaker 2: of you guys opinions. Anybody has any problem with what
Speaker 2: I say, contact me. I'm not an attorney. None of
Speaker 2: this is a legal opinion. This is all pure opinion
Speaker 2: from looking at public domain in facts that anybody can
Speaker 2: look at and derive a different opinion than I have.
Speaker 2: In addition to all that weird stuff that your viewer
Speaker 2: pointed to, I don't agree that there's a sniper in
Speaker 2: a window up to the right. From what I see,
Speaker 2: that kill shot comes from in the tunnel or behind
Speaker 2: the tunnel five hundred feet per second. There's a lot
Speaker 2: of math and a lot of very good evidence to
Speaker 2: back that up. But we do see other videos where
Speaker 2: the security guys are touching their glasses. We can tell
Speaker 2: by the style of sunglasses they're wearing ray band sunglasses.
Speaker 2: And I think a lot of people know that they
Speaker 2: have these Meta ray band sunglasses that can record video,
Speaker 2: and people have presumed, oh, they're recording him while he's
Speaker 2: getting killed, and that's so terrible. But there's something that
Speaker 2: fewer people know, which is that just a few weeks ago,
Speaker 2: Meta came out with version two of their glasses, which,
Speaker 2: in addition to recording video, they actually display video in
Speaker 2: the glasses. So if that team we're coordinating with hand
Speaker 2: signals and video indicators inside the glasses, or even possibly
Speaker 2: controlling a remote air gun on some kind of turret
Speaker 2: in that tunnel, perhaps someone is seeing a video feed
Speaker 2: from that camera behind Charlie controlling a gun inside the
Speaker 2: tunnel or behind the tunnel. I don't know. I'm not
Speaker 2: saying that's what happened. I'm just saying we know this
Speaker 2: technology exists. I agree. Those guys are doing something weird.
Speaker 2: And there is a moment where somebody seems to activate something.
Speaker 2: People have presumed it was one of these palm guns,
Speaker 2: but I find it impossible to presume that somebody even
Speaker 2: aiming carefully with one of those little guns. I don't
Speaker 2: think it's just too precise a shot to just whip
Speaker 2: out a gun and randomly flick it with your finger
Speaker 2: and have it go. But if it's a wireless remote
Speaker 2: that triggers two digi trigger guns, one of which is
Speaker 2: being aimed by somebody else through these metaglasses that have
Speaker 2: an overlay like this of a very high resolution image
Speaker 2: of the back of Charlie's head coming from a four
Speaker 2: K camera right behind him. I know it sounds complicated,
Speaker 2: but we're talking about technologies that exist, and it seems
Speaker 2: like this could have been done.
Speaker 6: Well, we've seen this type of stuff in movies from
Speaker 6: years ago with less levels of technology.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so.
Speaker 6: You know, it's very interesting, and honestly, it's really starts
Speaker 6: to make you wonder, Yeah, what went through what when?
Speaker 6: What happened to have to set all of this up
Speaker 6: like this? Seemed like a pretty orchestrated in depth.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Absolutely, Yeah. And you know, here's the thing, Marcus,
Speaker 2: A lot of people look. The way I like to
Speaker 2: investigate anything is I say, Okay, what is the evidence
Speaker 2: we have here? We have videos coming from the internet.
Speaker 2: Are these videos even of sufficient quality for us to
Speaker 2: derive any evidentiary value from them? And if they're not,
Speaker 2: I'm not gonna stretch it and try to make it
Speaker 2: tell me something that it can't tell me. I'll go
Speaker 2: look for the original video from that person who made
Speaker 2: this decimated crop, low resolution version, and then once I
Speaker 2: find the best evidence, I start to go through and
Speaker 2: try to find what can I determine with certainty from
Speaker 2: this evidence. So before I got onto this projectile in
Speaker 2: the video, I had discovered a number of things on
Speaker 2: other videos that looked to me like UAVs, and I
Speaker 2: started talking about drones, and so people would say to me, oh, drones,
Speaker 2: So Israel did it, right, And I was like, well,
Speaker 2: I don't have any evidence about who did or did
Speaker 2: not do it. I'm just saying these items are present.
Speaker 2: And to be clear, I'm not saying Israel did it.
Speaker 2: I'm not saying Israel didn't do it. I don't have
Speaker 2: any evidence that indicts or absolves any particular party. I'm
Speaker 2: just saying we see on video a bunch of guys
Speaker 2: who work for Charlie Kirk who are touching their glasses
Speaker 2: and triggering things and doing weird things that is very suspicious.
Speaker 2: We see this technology all around them. We're aware of
Speaker 2: these other technologies that exist. Anyone at all could have
Speaker 2: employed these things. This is not necessarily so exotic. I mean, yeah,
Speaker 2: you need a couple thousand bucks probably, but it's not
Speaker 2: like I'm saying, oh, this is some plasma powered imaginary
Speaker 2: technology that's coming from Marvel Comics or something like that.
Speaker 2: This is stuff.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 6: Something interesting about it that you just made me think
Speaker 6: of is what if it's more of like a compartmentalized event.
Speaker 6: What if it was many groups working together that didn't
Speaker 6: really know that they were working together. Yeah, like that
Speaker 6: that seems like what's most plausible.
Speaker 2: I think that's the case with almost any intelligence operation
Speaker 2: sort of inherently. And there's one other piece that I
Speaker 2: don't know. Maybe you guys have heard about this. This
Speaker 2: was reported from public FAA radar all the airplane Yeah,
Speaker 2: the ADSB tracking data from this US Army Bombardier Global
Speaker 2: sixty five hundred. This is one of two new jets
Speaker 2: in a program called HADES, the High Accuracy Detection and
Speaker 2: Exploitation System. This is an ISR jet that the Army
Speaker 2: uses for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance. And this jet was
Speaker 2: flying something like two miles away. It slowed down to
Speaker 2: just above its stall speed, something like one hundred and
Speaker 2: twenty five knots, and it reduced altitude from thirty eight
Speaker 2: thousand feet to two hundred feet off the ground as
Speaker 2: it did sort of lazy circles over Utah Lake. And separately,
Speaker 2: there are articles about how the US Army in twenty
Speaker 2: twenty four, I think January put out a request for
Speaker 2: a proposal for a system that could launch and retrieve
Speaker 2: drones from this jet, and I have reason to believe
Speaker 2: that they achieved that goal. So we've got this very suspicious,
Speaker 2: highly capable, classified capabilities jet flying around two miles away
Speaker 2: from the university. I've got evidence that there were UAVs
Speaker 2: flying over the university, pretty coincident with this murder of
Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk. Now it's a US Army jet. But Marcus,
Speaker 2: as you just said, I agree with you I think
Speaker 2: intelligence agencies frequently operate in ways that defy allegiance to
Speaker 2: any particular country, and they work together to do all
Speaker 2: kinds of clandestine things. So here's this is the video
Speaker 2: that I found these drones in. This is a video
Speaker 2: that was recorded by a guy named Adam Bartholomew, who
Speaker 2: is just a dad. His son goes to this college,
Speaker 2: and the guy's a hobbyist live streamer. He's live streaming
Speaker 2: the event for nineteen minutes and on his YouTube feed,
Speaker 2: one second before Charlie Kirk is shot, he's talking to
Speaker 2: these kids. One second before Charlie Kirk is shot. His
Speaker 2: live stream cuts out. He doesn't record the sound or
Speaker 2: the video of the gunshot, not in his live stream,
Speaker 2: and I found he had a full recording of this
Speaker 2: event on YouTube. So I contacted him and I retrieved
Speaker 2: his original recording. I'll explain how he made that. But
Speaker 2: in this video, I'm identifying various objects in the sky,
Speaker 2: pointing out how under high magnification and close scrutiny we
Speaker 2: can tell that one's a bird. We're about to get
Speaker 2: an insect flying by. It's amazing the resolving power of
Speaker 2: this camera. But here we see what looks like a wasp,
Speaker 2: its segmented body flopping around as it flies. We see
Speaker 2: its wings flapping. I mean, it's amazing resolution, but this
Speaker 2: is obviously a very small biological creature close to the lens,
Speaker 2: flying right over this kid's head. It's not a bird
Speaker 2: off in the distance. And so then boom, the gunshot fires,
Speaker 2: and everyone turns and starts running, and Adam Bartholomew says,
Speaker 2: what was that? And bravely he runs over to the ledge.
Speaker 2: Everybody's concerned about getting shot. He's concerned about covering the action.
Speaker 2: And again, I don't have any experience hunting or whatever,
Speaker 2: but when I see birds, they're flying away when guns
Speaker 2: get shot. Birds aren't interested in human chaos and loud
Speaker 2: gun shots and buildings. Birds are flying over there by
Speaker 2: the mountains where there's a lake and fish and other
Speaker 2: things that birds are interested in. This is also an
Speaker 2: oddly circular orbit that this thing flies right over the
Speaker 2: crowd that to me looks like the orbital path of
Speaker 2: a reconnaissance drone with its own high speed camera, just
Speaker 2: getting intelligence about what's happening on the ground, perhaps to
Speaker 2: inform that Hades jet. And then we see another Sorry,
Speaker 2: this is the same one in super slow motion. Now
Speaker 2: there's wiggling that some people interpret as wing flapping, but
Speaker 2: I believe that is video compression artifacting around the high
Speaker 2: contrast edges of that object, then we get another object
Speaker 2: that is a little too low resolution to exactly make out.
Speaker 2: But I don't know if you guys can see this
Speaker 2: over the zoom call, but it seems to be emitting smoke.
Speaker 2: I've never seen a bar emit smoke. I do think
Speaker 2: an electrically powered lithium polymer powered drone that's about to
Speaker 2: experience a catastrophic failure and burn up might admit smoke,
Speaker 2: or a hybrid electric gasoline powered drone might emit smoke.
Speaker 2: And simultaneously with that, we've got this fast mover going
Speaker 2: from the middle of the frame up to the upper
Speaker 2: right hand corner, zipping up the frame like some sort
Speaker 2: of man made propelled device. And then it or something
Speaker 2: similar comes back and does another move. It's going up.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 2: People say, oh, that's a falcon, but I don't think so.
Speaker 2: I think falcons can tuck their wings back and dive
Speaker 2: down very quickly, but I've never seen a falcon shoot
Speaker 2: up without flapping its wings. So again, I can't prove
Speaker 2: that these are drones, but under careful analysis, these video
Speaker 2: images reveal certain things. And let me just give you
Speaker 2: one more piece on this, because I got this video
Speaker 2: from Adam Bartholomew, who runs a YouTube channel and an
Speaker 2: X account called Life is Driving. And the way I
Speaker 2: got them was Charlie Kirk was murdered at twelve twenty
Speaker 2: three on September tenth, and I was looking around the
Speaker 2: internet like everybody else, for any kind of you know, evidence,
Speaker 2: I could find videos, whatever, and immediately I found this guy.
Speaker 2: His video was going viral, and I went to his
Speaker 2: YouTube channel and I was watching it, and then I
Speaker 2: downloaded it because I want to scrutinize it a little
Speaker 2: bit more closely. And as I was looking at it,
Speaker 2: I said, wait a minute, this video is only twenty
Speaker 2: minutes long. He had he had an hour and something
Speaker 2: video that I saw over here. So I went back
Speaker 2: to his YouTube channel and I noticed under the live
Speaker 2: tab the video was like twenty five minutes or twenty
Speaker 2: seven minutes. It's very short. And then under the video
Speaker 2: tab where he had uploaded a video, it was an
Speaker 2: hour and seven or an hour and now and something
Speaker 2: like that. So I said, well, now, wait a minute,
Speaker 2: let's look at the short video. And that's where I
Speaker 2: discovered that it cut out just at the moment of
Speaker 2: the gunshot. And what struck me is so weird. People
Speaker 2: will say, oh, you know, you walk around on these
Speaker 2: live streams, you can get radio interference, and it's like, look, hey,
Speaker 2: I know you commented at the beginning of the video
Speaker 2: that you see me walking around New York City. I've
Speaker 2: been doing this for a long time and I have
Speaker 2: a lot of experience in doing this. When I'm walking around,
Speaker 2: I have a bonded link aggregating array that I'm essentially wearing.
Speaker 2: So I'm using AT and T, Verizon and T Mobile
Speaker 2: with a fourth phone, aggregating the signals so that if
Speaker 2: anytime I lose connection, it switches to the best connection.
Speaker 2: It maintains a continuous stream.
Speaker 1: On your walk.
Speaker 2: Yes, Adam Bartholomew, despite just being a hobbyist dad, he's
Speaker 2: an adamant technology and avid technologist and a perfectionist. He
Speaker 2: wants his live streams to be good. He uses a
Speaker 2: similar system to what I use. And the thing that
Speaker 2: was so strange is he cut out one second before
Speaker 2: I just said. It's so weird at him because about
Speaker 2: two weeks before this, I have kind of an ongoing
Speaker 2: beef with this NYPD sergeant who I believe is up
Speaker 2: to Nowood, and I saw him in Washington Square Park
Speaker 2: and I went up to them and started having kind
Speaker 2: of a what many people might consider a rude conversation
Speaker 2: with the cops. And when I walked away, this twenty
Speaker 2: year old jabberjaw moron kid walks up to me and
Speaker 2: he says something unintelligible. He's looking at his phone, he's
Speaker 2: looking at me, he's looking at his phone, and then
Speaker 2: my livestream cut, but it cut in a way that
Speaker 2: was very unusual. And I went and looked at the
Speaker 2: diagnostic log from my phone and it had crashed the
Speaker 2: live streaming application. It wasn't an IMSI catcher or a
Speaker 2: Wi Fi signal interference device that requires a lot of power,
Speaker 2: big battery pack, etc. A big transmit or this just
Speaker 2: crashed the application. So I began looking into that, and
Speaker 2: what I discovered was this company called Olego it Security,
Speaker 2: and they had identified what they call Airborne, which is
Speaker 2: a wormable zero click remote code execution exploit that can
Speaker 2: be launched at your phone and by zero click they
Speaker 2: mean you don't have to go donate money to the
Speaker 2: Prints of Nigeria. You don't have to go to a
Speaker 2: specific website and download malicious software. Somebody just gets within
Speaker 2: a Bluetooth range of you, and if you're using your
Speaker 2: Apple wireless headphones or any kind of Bluetooth technology, they
Speaker 2: can launch one of these airborne attacks. And what it
Speaker 2: does is it overwhelms the Bluetooth receiver in your phone
Speaker 2: with requests or bad information, and it can cause the
Speaker 2: phone to do all kinds of things. And by the way,
Speaker 2: this is just a publicly known exploit that this it
Speaker 2: security company that publishes zero day exploits so that Apple
Speaker 2: will update the phone. That's what they know about. I
Speaker 2: have a feeling the US Army might know about other
Speaker 2: ones that aren't yet publicly published. So what I think
Speaker 2: was happening is we have this high accuracy detection and
Speaker 2: exploitation system, and I think with a high degree of accuracy,
Speaker 2: it detected Adam Bartholomew and it launched an airborne exploit
Speaker 2: that crashed his livestream. And I think the purpose of
Speaker 2: that was whoever perpetrated this one to make sure that
Speaker 2: the only media that was going out was controlled so
Speaker 2: that they could give you no resolution, cropped, decimated videos
Speaker 2: that tell the story that they want told. And it's
Speaker 2: the same reason why they're releasing twenty frames per second
Speaker 2: and then I call that out and they say, oh,
Speaker 2: thirty frames per second, And now they're screwed because through
Speaker 2: their mistake, I've been able to determine with what I
Speaker 2: would call a high degree of confidence. Again, this is
Speaker 2: not proof. Proof is to be determined by the jury,
Speaker 2: the court, whoever it is that's determining proof. This is evidence,
Speaker 2: and I believe a preponderance of evidence that should prove
Speaker 2: what I'm saying.
Speaker 1: Well, we've got a wrap, but I want to read
Speaker 1: this quick. This just came out and evolving involving Jason
Speaker 1: christ and probably hang on, hang on a second. I mean,
Speaker 1: we really have to we have to show this. I
Speaker 1: don't know what Candas Owen is Candas Owens is doing
Speaker 1: right now, but this is the response or Candace, you
Speaker 1: absolutely have to get linked up with Jason Goodman of
Speaker 1: a crowd source to truth. He is a professional cinematographer
Speaker 1: and has top notch expertise and analyzing videos. He is
Speaker 1: doing great investigative reporting on Charles on Charlie's assassination. He
Speaker 1: also dug deep into Butler. So I mean, Jason, what
Speaker 1: an eye opening experience. And you know you've got to
Speaker 1: follow him because every day is a new adventure and
Speaker 1: it's awesome. So Jason, thank you very much. We got
Speaker 1: to have you back.
Speaker 6: You got to let us know when you hook up
Speaker 6: with Candae.
Speaker 2: Well absolutely, and thank you guys so much for having
Speaker 2: me on. There's one last piece I want to leave
Speaker 2: you with because you know, when I started publishing this
Speaker 2: information on my main X account here jg Underscore CSTT,
Speaker 2: I was getting to a point where every day I
Speaker 2: had a tweet that was exceeding a million views per day, yes,
Speaker 2: and then I got hit with this warning that it's
Speaker 2: sensitive content. And now a lot of people are telling me,
Speaker 2: look it, it's gone down from a million views, and
Speaker 2: I'm not sure trying to say ooh, social media, I'm
Speaker 2: getting clicks. I'm just saying I think this is important
Speaker 2: information that I want people to see. And now that
Speaker 2: every single thing that I publish has this sensitive content,
Speaker 2: almost nobody can see it. So I'm trying to get
Speaker 2: this lifted. If Elon Musk sees this video. If anybody
Speaker 2: has any influence with X and can get this sensitive content,
Speaker 2: this is what people see when they try to follow
Speaker 2: crowdsource the truth. They can't find it.
Speaker 1: Wow. Yes, Jason, thank you so much.
Speaker 2: Thank you.
Speaker 1: You're awesome and very few people have your expertise, so
Speaker 1: you put that together with what you're looking at and
Speaker 1: it's amazing. So no, we'll be watching you on the
Speaker 1: street and Sunday Nights with Charles. Right, yes, okay, thanks
Speaker 1: very much, Jason, Thank you very much, Thank you much.
Speaker 2: Guys, take care.
Speaker 1: Thanks right, thank