Speaker 1: What's going on.
Speaker 2: Thank you so much for listening to this podcast. It
is heard live every day from noon to three on
WBT Radio in Charlotte. And if you want exclusive content
like invitations to events, the weekly live stream, my daily
show prep with all the links, become a patron, go
to dpeteclendershow dot com. Make sure you hit the subscribe button.
Get every episode for free right to your smartphone or tablet,
And again, thank you so much for your support. Here's
Donald Trump from the Oval Office yesterday. He had the
President of the Philippines there as well. He makes one
reference to him. And here's the Q and a president.
Speaker 3: Here's a farmer Justice Department seeing an interview with Blaine Maxwell.
Speaker 2: Tour question about Elaine Maxwell.
Speaker 1: Then you don't know anything about it. They're gonna know
what meet her, They're gonna there's.
Speaker 3: Your Denity Turning General office reached out to Glaine Nashwelle's
attorney asked you, yeah, I don't know about it, but
I think it's something that would be sound appropriate to
do you your Deputy Turny General, as your former attorney
from THEE.
Speaker 1: No, I have no consider that he's very all right.
Speaker 2: So these three questions are all about interviewing Gallaine Maxwell
and do you feel it's inappropriate your deputy was attorney
who used to work for you in that relationship or
whatever like, And he's just like, yeah, I think it's appropriate. Yeah,
go ahead and do it. I don't know anything about that,
and then he pivots.
Speaker 3: He's a very talented person, he's very smart. I didn't
know that they were going to do it. I don't
really follow that too much. It's it's a sort of
a witch hunt, just a continuation of the witch hunt.
Speaker 1: The witch hunt that you should be.
Speaker 3: Talking about is they caught President Obama absolutely cold, Chelsea Gabbert.
Speaker 1: What they did to this country.
Speaker 3: In twenty sixteen, starting in twenty sixteen, but going up
all the way going up to twenty twenty of the election.
They tried to rig the election. Then they got caught,
and they should be very severe consequt what is for that?
You know, when we caught Hillary Clinton, I said, you
know what, let's not go too far here. It's the
ex wife of a president. And I thought it was
sort of terrible and I let her off the hook,
and I'm very happy I did. But it's time to
start after what they did to me, and whether it's
right or wrong, it's time to go after people. Obama's
been caught directly. So people say, oh, you know a group,
It's not a group, it's Obama. His orders are on
the paper, the papers are signed. The papers came right
out of their office. They sent everything to be highly classified.
Well the highly classified it has been released. And what
they did in twenty sixteen and in twenty twenty is
very criminal. It's criminal at the highest level. So that's
really the things you should be talking about. I know
nothing about the other but I think it's appropriate that
they do go I asked.
Speaker 1: You about that.
Speaker 3: As a president Tolby Godder has submitted a criminal referral
to the Department of Justice.
Speaker 1: From your perspective, who.
Speaker 2: Should the dots target as part of their investigation? What's
the city figures in you a lot that.
Speaker 3: Manstry Well, based on what I read, and I read
pretty much what you read, it would be President Obama.
He started it, and Biden was there with him, and
Komi was there, and Clapper, the whole group was there, Brennan,
they were all there in a.
Speaker 1: Room right here.
Speaker 3: This is the room. This is much more beautiful than
it was then. But that's okay. I have nice pictures up.
They came out of the vaults. They were in there
for a hundred years. This is much more beautiful. We
have the Declaration of Independence now in the room, which
wasn't here. I guess people didn't feel too good about
putting it here, but I do.
Speaker 1: But you know what, if you look.
Speaker 3: At that those papers, they have a stone called and
it was President Obama. It wasn't lots of people all
over the place. It was them too, But the leader
of the gang was President Obama, Barack Hussein Obama.
Speaker 1: Have you heard of him?
Speaker 3: Yes, And except for the fact that he gets shielded
by the press.
Speaker 1: For his entire life. True, that's the one they look.
He's guilty. It's not a question, you know. I like
to say, let's give it time. It's there. He's guilty.
This was treason. This was every word you can think of.
Speaker 3: They tried to steal the election, they tried to obfuscape
the election. They did things that nobody's ever even imagined.
Even in other countries. You've seen some pretty rough countries.
This man has seen some pretty rough countries, but you've
never seen anything like that and we have all of
the documents, and from what Tolsey told me, she's got
thousands of additional documents coming. So President Obama it was
his concept, his idea, but he also got it from
crooked Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 1: Crooked is a three dollars bill.
Speaker 3: Hillary Clinton and her group, the Democrats, spent twelve million
dollars to Christopher Steel to write up a report that
was a total fake report. Took two years to figure
that out, but it came out that it was a
total fake report.
Speaker 1: It was made up fiction, and they used that.
Speaker 3: The one thing they weren't able to do was to
get and probably the only thing I respect about the
press in years is the press refused to write it
before the election. They refused to put it in. The
Steel report was a disaster, all lies, all fabrication, all
admitted and admitted fraud.
Speaker 1: She paid twelve million.
Speaker 3: Dollars and the Democrats for that report to a wise
guy named Christopher Steel. He wrote a phony report, and
they wanted to get that report in before the election.
And I'll tell you what I talk about all the time,
the fake news, how bad it is, But in this case,
they wouldn't do it.
Speaker 1: They saw it they read it and they said we
don't believe it.
Speaker 3: And it was only after substantially, like a month and
a half after the election that I got printed. And
it was a big wisp. It was just like a
bang of nothing because the election had ended. If that
report had gotten published by the New York Times or somebody.
And I respect the Times for maybe only this, because
they're crooked as you can be. They're a terrible paper,
a crooked, corrupt paper.
Speaker 1: But for this one moment they said, this is boost.
Speaker 3: We can't put this in, and neither could any other
Wall Street journals allows the paper, very very dishonest paper.
Speaker 1: As you see.
Speaker 3: I'm suing them for a lot of money because they
do things very badly. It's a really it's got a
nice name, but it's really, in my opinion, it's a
terrible paper and it can be corrupt. But just so
you know, they didn't take the Steel report. It was
the dossier, remember the famous dossier. I called it the
News dossier. The News wouldn't publish it, and I'm amazed
they had two and a half months.
Speaker 1: It was finished, two and a half months.
Speaker 3: That was supposed to be what was going to happen
and it got published a couple of months after the election,
and frankly, nobody cared too much about it.
Speaker 1: But that was a big thing.
Speaker 3: No, No, we caught Hillary Clinton, we caught Barack Hussein Obama.
They're the ones, and then you have many many people
under them, Susan Rice, They're all there, The names are
all there, and I guess they figured they're going to
put this in classified information and nobody will ever see
it again. But it doesn't work that way. And it's
the most unbelievable thing I think I've ever read. So
you ought to take a look at that and stop
talking about nonsense, because this is big stuff.
Speaker 1: Never has a thing like this happened in the history
of our country. And by the way, it morphed.
Speaker 3: Into the twenty twenty race, and the twenty twenty race
was rigged and a rigged election, and because it was rigged,
we have millions of people in our country.
Speaker 1: We have we had inflation.
Speaker 3: We solved the inflation problem, but millions and millions of
people came into our country because of.
Speaker 1: That, and people that shouldn't have been, people.
Speaker 3: From gangs and from jails and from mental institutions, people
that we don't want in our country, and people that
were getting out, dangerous people.
Speaker 1: Eleven eight hundred and eighty eight murderers.
Speaker 3: Many of them fifty percent more than fifty percent murdered
more than one person. I hate to say this was
such a distinguished guest, but you know, they asked me
a question.
Speaker 1: I got to answer the question.
Speaker 3: No, Barack Hussein Obama is the ring leader. Hillary Clinton
was right there with him, and so was Sleepy Joe Biden,
and so were the rest of them, call me clapper,
the whole group. And they tried to rig an election,
and they got caught. And then they did rig the
election in twenty twenty. And then because I knew I
won the election by a lot, I did it a
third time and I won in a landslide.
Speaker 1: Every swing state.
Speaker 3: Won the popular vote, but I won that all the
same way in twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: And look at the damage that was cast.
Speaker 2: All right, So there's the president's full comments on this,
the treason comment about Obama the ring leader of Obamagate.
I'm going to walk through the chronology on this. There's
only a couple dates as part of this timeline. It
goes back to December twenty sixteen.
Speaker 1: All right.
Speaker 2: If you're listening to this show, you know I try
to keep up with all sorts of current events, and
I know you do too, And you've probably heard me
say get your news from multiple sources. Why well, because
it's how you detect media bias, which is why I've
been so impressed with ground News. It's an app and
it's a website and it combines news from around the
world in one place, so you can compare coverage and
verify information. You can check it out at check dot
ground dot News. I put the link in the podcast
description too. I started using ground News a few months
ago and more recently chose to work with them as
an affiliate because it lets me see clearly how stories
get covered and by whom. The blind spot feature shows
you which stories get ignored by the left and the right.
See for yourself. Check dot ground, dot news slash pete.
Subscribe through that link and you'll get fifteen percent off
any subscription. I use the Vantage plan to get unlimited
access to every feature. Your subscription then not only helps
my podcast, but it also supports ground News as they
make the media landscape more transparent. So here is the
relevant timeline. December seventh, twenty sixteen, right, so a month
after the election where Trump has just shocked the world
by defeating Hillary Clinton. So that's December seventh, the next day,
December eighth, the next day December ninth, and then a
month less than a month later January sixth, twenty seventeen,
right before Trump gets sworn into office. So those are
the relevant dates. So what happened on the first date
December seventh? This was when the intelligence community assessment was
prepared for Barack Obama as part of his PDB, the
Presidential Daily Brief, and the intelligence assessment was that Russia
did not tamper with the election. They did not hack
the machines, they did not have the capability to do so,
there is no evidence that they had the intention of
doing so. That was the initial ICA December eighth. The
editor of that ICA, which generally takes a couple months
to put together and you run it through all the
different intel agencies and stuff, the editor of the ICA
cancels the ICA that was that was done on the seventh.
The next day, it's canceled, and the reason for canceling
it was based on new guidance. That's not new information,
that's guidance. Where does the guidance come from? Well, according
to the declassified memos now that the Director of National
Intelligence Tulca Gabbard declassified on Friday, another batch came out
today that people are sifting through and oh boy, there's
some stuff in there too. The memos stated, per the
president's request, that's the new guidance. Obama orders a new
ICA on December ninth, So the seventh, the original ICA
is completed saying Russia didn't tamper with the election. The eighth,
the next day the ICA is canceled, where it's rescinded
based on new guidance. And then December ninth, Obama orders
a new ICA and he puts Brennan in charge of it.
Why is that important? Well, Brennan was the guy who
was all in on the Steele dossier. Why because he
coordinated it the head of the CIA. He's the guy,
he's the connecting point, he's the funnel point for the
British intel that came in as part of the Steele
dossier from Christopher Steele, a former British MI six agent.
And then January sixth, before Trump takes office, the new
ICA is released, which includes the Steele dossier and not
only includes it, it relies on it in order to
draw the quote key judgment that Russia wanted Trump to win.
That was the motive for the Russian meddaling, not hacking.
There was never any proof that Russia hacked into our
election system, that they changed any votes, even though Democrats
still to this day believe this, like almost half of
Democrats still believe that Putin put Trump into office in
twenty sixteen. And that's all based on this. This misinformation,
this fake news and the meddling in the election is
what you keep hearing in all of the reports. It's
what Obama cited or is pres Guy cited when they
responded to Trump's comments they are about treason. They said,
you know, that's just ridiculous, and we don't ever respond
to this stuff, but we'll respond to this and whatever whatever,
and hey, it's you know, we already had two different
assessments that showed Russia was, you know, meddling in our elections,
and that part is true. See, this is what this
is what the left is doing, the Democrats of the media.
But I repeat myself, this is what they're doing. And
because yes, I've heard our news too, because we rely
on wire services like AP or Reuters. This is the
narrative and people who aren't aware of how this works,
like when you part When you take these stories and
they unfold over a long period of time, there gets
to be like a template that gets written as a
story quote has legs and you have to kind of
recap the story to give the latest development in this story.
And so a template gets written that summarizes the crux
of the story, and this is the template. An assessment
by the US intelligence community published in January of twenty seventeen,
concluded that Russia, using social media disinformation hacking that was
the DNC hacking and Russian bot farms, sought to damage
Democrat Hillary Clinton's campaign and bolster Trump. But see that's
not true. That's not true. It didn't find that it
sought to bolster Trump. In fact, the Russians, according to
some of the information that just came out today, they
had a ton of stuff on Hillary that they were
looking to use. Here's a great idea. How about making
an escape to a really special and secluded getaway in
western North Carolina. Just a quick drive up the mountain
and cabins of Ashville is your connection. Whether you're celebrating
an anniversary, a honeymoon, maybe you want to plan a
memorable proposal, or get family and friends together for a
big old reunion. Cabins of Asheville has the ideal spot
for you where you can reconnect with your loved ones
and the things that truly matter. Nestled within the breath
taking fourteen thousand acres of the Pisga National Forest, their
cabins offer a serene escape in the heart of the
Blue Ridge Mountains. Centrally located between Ashville and the entrance
of the Great Smoky Mountain National Park. It's the perfect
balance of seclusion and proximity to all the local attractions
with hot tubs, fireplaces, air conditioning, smart TVs, Wi Fi grills,
outdoor tables and your own private covered porch. Choose from
thirteen cabins, six cottages, two villas, and a great lodge
with eleven king sized bedrooms. Cabins of Ashville has the
ideal spot for you for any occasion, and they have
pet friendly accommodations. Call or text eight two eight, three
six seven seventy sixty eight or check out all there
is to offer at Cabins Offashville dot Com and make
memay Marie That'll last a lifetime. The response from Obama's
camp spokesperson Patrick Roadenbush quote, out of respect for the
Office of the Presidency, our office does not normally dignify
the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White
House with a response. But these claims are outrageous enough
to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a
weak attempt at distraction. Nothing in the document issued last
week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to
influence the twenty sixteen in presidential election, but did not
successfully manipulate any votes. Right, that's the deflection, because the
assessments that came out did find that. The problem is
is that the December twenty sixteen revised ICA attached motive
to the meddling, and the motive was to help Trump
win the race. So if that was true, though, what
Gabber just released today, this is what our own intel
agencies reported on what they thought the Russian spies knew
or thought they knew, And according to our own intelligence,
Hillary Clinton was keeping all of her medical problems strictly secret,
including from her top staffers. How do we know this, Well,
she was running an unprotected server that the Intel Agency
said and the FBI said, probably got hacked, likely likely
was hacked. The stuff that she kept on her Homebrew server,
not an email account. It's not the emails, it's the server,
and that was unguarded, and so obviously it got hacked,
and everybody got everything that was in there, including probably
her medical records and per Russia's intelligence from the DNC
hack as well, Obama and party leaders found the state
of Hillary Clinton's health to be quote extraordinarily alarming. She
suffered from quote intensified psychoemotional problems, including uncontrollable fits of anger, aggressiveness,
and cheerfulness. She was placed on a daily schedule of
heavy tranquilizers. She was, as we already knew, obsessed with
a thirst for power. The renamed KGB. The SVR also
had intelligence indicating that Hillary Clinton suffered from type two diabetes,
as well as ischemic heart disease, deep vein thrombosis, and
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. So ask yourself this, If Russia
wanted to help Trump win, why not put that out
right that's what the Russian spies thought they had, or
at least that's what we thought they thought they had.
And considering that they probably had access to all of
her stuff, they probably did have that. This doesn't work
with the motive. And remember the motive is the key here,
because the motive launched Crossfire, Hurricane right, it launched the impeachment,
it launched the Alpha Bank, smear all of it. And
here's the smoking gun. I outlined the key dates here.
December seventh, December eighth, and December ninth of twenty sixteen.
The first ICA is put together that says Russia did
not tamper with the election, they didn't hack the machines
and all that, they had no preference. They just tried
to sow chaos. The editor then the next day cancels that.
He rescinds it under quote new guidance. The day after that,
December ninth, Obama orders a new ICA to be conducted,
puts Brennan in charge of it, and that day, December ninth,
the New York Time publishes a story about the motive.
How would they have even known that? How did they
even know that? This was a you know, high confidence
finding of the intelligence community. They hadn't reworked the ICA,
they wouldn't be doing that for the next few weeks.
And by the way, all of the other intellagencies besides Clappers,
the FBI, you know, Comey's and Brennan's CIA, everybody else
was cut out. Highly irregular, also irregular that all of
the brass was involved in the ICA, the redraft.
Speaker 1: So they.
Speaker 2: They leaked it. They leaked the conclusion that they sought
to arrive at with the rewrite of the ICA. There's
that's your smoking gun. And by the way, the Washington
Post then followed, I think the next day or that
day with their own story. Both of those outlets won
Pulitzer Prizes for this coverage. So who do I not trust?
The Washington Post and the New York Times, right, the
ones that want pulletzers for printing planted lies from the
Obama administration per the president's request. That's according to the files,
that's from the memos. Yeah, this is very bad. And
that's why you keep hearing this line that, oh, he's
just saying this is a distraction from the Epstein files. Now,
like I don't have to be distracted from one story
over the other. I can walk in chew gum at
the same time. In fact, I can do this talk
show and chew gum at the same time. I'm doing
it right now, so I'm able to pay attention to
both of these stories and both of these investigations as
they proceed. Let me go to this is National Review. Yeah,
here we go. This is from the Federalist dot com
by Molly Hemingway. Top officials working on an intelligence community
analysis about Russia's interference in the twenty sixteen election were
overruled by CIA Director John Brennan. This is according to
records reviewed exclusively by The Federalist. The dispute was over
the key judgment in a January twenty seventeen ICA this
is the one that got rewritten that Russia had interfered
in the elections, specifically because Putin and the Russian government
aspired to help President elect Trump's election chances. The senior
intelligence officials pointed out that we're writing this stuff the
raw intel. They pointed out the lack of evidence to
substantiate the claim. They said, quote, we have no intelligence
to directly support this aspiration point. The experts did not
disagree that Russia had continued its practice of attempting to
sow chaos in our elections. They believe the intelligence indicated
Russia sought to weaken presumptive winner Hillary Clinton, and those
efforts may have indirectly helped Trump, but they were concerned
about the lack of evidence for the claim that became
the cornerstone of the Russian collusion narrative, in which Trump
was accused of conspiring with Russia to steal the election.
They wrote, quote, can you really prove Moscow was trying
to get Trump elected? And Brennan called the dissenting individuals
into his office on December thirtieth, had a lengthy meeting
in which they articulated their series serious concerns. The assessment,
though he said, will stay the same, so he overruled
his own Russian experts in order to keep the steal
dossier as part of this report and to keep the
motive part of the ica. You know, stories or power.
They help us make sense of things, to understand experiences.
Stories connect us to the people of our past while
transcending generations. They help us process the meaning of life,
and our stories are told through images and videos. Preserve
your stories with creative video started in nineteen ninety seven
and Mint Hill, North Carolina. It was the first company
to provide this valuable service, converting images, photos and videos
into high quality produced slide shows, videos and albums. The trusted,
talented and dedicated team at Creative Video will go over
all of the details with you to create a perfect project.
Satisfaction guaranteed. Drop them off in person or mail them.
They'll be ready in a week or two. Memorial videos
for your loved ones, videos for rehearsal, dinners, weddings, graduations, Christmas,
family vacations, birthdays, or just your family stories, all told
through images. That's what your photos and videos are. They
are your life told through the eyes of everyone around
you and all who came before you, and they will
tell others to come who you are. Visit create video
dot com. Tulsea Gabbard claimed on social media that the
intelligence materials that she published were marked declassified on July seventeenth,
so a week ago, and that the materials contained evidence
of a quote treasonous conspiracy and years long coup orchestrated
by Obama administration officials against Donald Trump. In subsequent media appearances,
she claimed that more declassified materials on the subject would
soon be released, and they have, they have, and so
I've got I mean, I've got so much stuff. I'm
not going to be able to get to it all.
At the heart of this, though, seems to be John Brennan. Yes,
Obama apparently made the request to redo the ICA. The
Intelligence Community Assessment said redo this tasked it to Brennan.
That was in December. On December ninth, that day, The
New York Times in the Washington Post published their stories,
somehow arriving at the high confidence conclusion that Trump was
helped by Putin because Putin wanted Trump to win. There
was no evidence to support that. The only evidence that
was cited in the ICA to support that was the
Steele dossier, which John Brennan had been shopping around for months.
He had been shopping it around for months and when
his own agency experts on Russia came to him and
they were like, dude, this Steele dossier. You can't draw conclusions.
And the problem is if you put this thing in,
people are going to say, well, this is all ridiculous.
Then they're going to discount everything that's in there. Overruled them.
He put it in there, and when he wrote his book.
He threw those dissenters that were writing the ICA threw
him under the bus, Molly Hemingway says, explaining his decision
to ignore the concerns of the career intel experts, he said, quote,
I came to the conclusion that the two officers had
not read all the available intelligence. That's why he kept
the Steele dossier in. He further claimed that he had
personal knowledge of raw intelligence that the Russia experts had
not seen. Brennan has never publicly shared what his secret
knowledge was. Brennan tightly restricted access to the information. The
CIA review of the ICA questioned, quote whether the extreme
limitations on access to underlying intelligence within the IC during
the ICA's preparation was justifiable? What does that mean? But
that was the That was Radcliffe's CIA assessment of this.
In other words, why are you doing this like we
like You've limited access to such a degree that nobody
can see it. Whatever this special information, super secret knowledge is,
whatever it is, you won't let anybody see it. And
you're asking everybody then to make an assessment based on
this information, which you won't explain, you won't cite. She
goes on to say, given the following that. Following its release,
the highest classified version of the ICA was shopped around
to literally hundreds of US officials. Furthermore, even those who
viewed the secret information strenuously debated whether it meant that
Putin aspired to help Trump or not. The New York
Times in April of twenty seventeen, so this is after
the ICA is out, revealed that Brennan began shopping this
claim that Russia supported Trump. Began shopping this in private
briefings to numerous members of Congress during August and September.
See he was trying he was trying to rig the election.
He was trying to prevent Trump from winning. When Brennan
briefed then Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on this claim, McConnell,
according to Brennan, responded, quote which translates to one might
say that the CIA and the Obama administration are making
such claims in order to prevent Donald Trump from getting
elected president. So he was wary. McConnell was like this, Yeah,
this doesn't sound right. Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid terrible person.
By contrast, he worked with Brennan on the contours of
a public letter about the Russia collusion hoax, so Harry
Reid was gamed to spread this around. Media knew about this.
That's what Trump was referencing in that audio clip at
the beginning of the hour where he was like, Oh,
the New York Times didn't run the Stele dossier stuff.
Because the media had the Steele dossier, they couldn't confirm
any of it, so they couldn't run it and they
couldn't confirm any of it because it was all a lie.
And Brennan was pushing this out there as opposition research,
which is what it was literally funded by the DNC
and the Hillary Clinton campaign. Like that's the contours of this. Now,
why did Brennan get tasked with leading the revision of
the ICA? The rewrite by Obama as per Obama's request?
Seems pretty clear Obama wanted this in the ICA. All right,
that'll do it for this episode. Thank you so much
for listening. I could not do the show without your
support and the support of the businesses that advertise on
the podcast, So if you'd like, please support them too
and tell them you heard it here. You can also
become a patron at my Patreon page or go to
thepetecleanershow dot com again, thank you so much for listening,
and don't break anything while I'm gone.