Speaker 1: A rod or is it the goobers. The goobers deliver.
Speaker 2: I deliver based on the topics that I think you're
Speaker 2: doing or are doing. Huh, but right now they could
Speaker 2: wake up a little.
Speaker 1: They need to wake up. I don't know what's going on.
Speaker 2: I feel it out. If I feel like you're done
Speaker 2: with a topic, I'll move on. If I feel like
Speaker 2: something will get you into a good topic, I contribute,
Speaker 2: or let a googer contribute.
Speaker 1: No, so you say we do have talkbacks but you're
Speaker 1: not using them. Well, it's all about quality and direction
Speaker 1: of the show.
Speaker 3: Oh so, so we do have talkbacks, but you're not
Speaker 3: using them.
Speaker 1: Editorial decisions. Okay, well, don't you worry.
Speaker 2: We've got a few butt but overall, the overarching theme
Speaker 2: wake up, goobers.
Speaker 1: You heard the drill, sergeant, wake up, wake up. That's right.
Speaker 3: I would say it's Californians, but I would say it's Californians, Washingtonians,
Speaker 3: Colorado's Illinois, Massachusetts, I mean all of the sanctuary states.
Speaker 3: Oregon as all of those citizens, and they're foul fellow
Speaker 3: travelers obviously, you know, fly Mexican flags, burned cars, attacks,
Speaker 3: attack the cops, loot rob burn whatever they're going to do.
Speaker 3: All of what's called part of the mostly peaceful protests
Speaker 3: against the immigrations and Customs enforcement roundups.
Speaker 1: There's not very much attention being paid to.
Speaker 3: Who these apparently meritorious undocumented people are in real life
Speaker 3: in this country. First, let's dispel the notion that they're
Speaker 3: all Mexicans, and California is not all Mexicans. My weekend
Speaker 3: producer Michael and I, who happens to be Hispanic. He
Speaker 3: and I were talking about this about how he can't
Speaker 3: understand as a Mexican himself, as an American citizen but
Speaker 3: of Mexican descent, he can't understand why the flying of
Speaker 3: the Mexican flag seems to dominate everything.
Speaker 1: Well, I think there's a lot more.
Speaker 3: I'm not an immigrant, but absent immigration, American would not
Speaker 3: be the country that we know that it is. If
Speaker 3: it were not for the immigrant population in the country,
Speaker 3: the legal immigrant population in this country, the United States
Speaker 3: would look like I don't know, Japan, old and aging.
Speaker 3: But still there are likely more foreign born people in
Speaker 3: the United States today than at any time in our
Speaker 3: entire history. And there's a chart that I found, and
Speaker 3: I'll try to go through the chart in a minute.
Speaker 3: But I don't want to go directly into the numbers yet.
Speaker 3: I want to add more of a framework before I
Speaker 3: get into some of the specifics.
Speaker 1: But legal immigrants in America work more.
Speaker 3: They have a higher workforce participation rate compared to native
Speaker 3: born Americans. You thought I was going to say compared
Speaker 3: to illegal aliens, but no, legal immigrants. Those who came
Speaker 3: here lawfully proper visas became legal citizens, naturalized citizens. They
Speaker 3: have a higher workforce participation rate compared to native born Americans,
Speaker 3: and they have higher educational attainment. Indeed, there are only
Speaker 3: two places that I can find in the entire world
Speaker 3: that the world's lead. The inventors want to be in.
Speaker 3: Two places that if if you're an inventor, if you
Speaker 3: have that kind of brain, that kind of mentality, and
Speaker 3: or you're an innovator. I shouldn't just say inventor, but
Speaker 3: you're an innovator. There are only two places in the
Speaker 3: world that you want to go to, Switzerland and the
Speaker 3: United States. If you try to put the United States
Speaker 3: of America on a chart with all of the other
Speaker 3: countries of the world when you compare significant inventions, you
Speaker 3: can't because the number in the United States is so
Speaker 3: high that it pops off any chart you might put together. Immigrants,
Speaker 3: legal immigrants come to this country to thrive. But I
Speaker 3: remember I rule about but this wave of uncontrolled immigration,
Speaker 3: like those that washed over the country during the Biden administration,
Speaker 3: those waves have implications for the country that we cannot ignore.
Speaker 3: So let's step back for just a second and look
Speaker 3: at Europe. There can be little doubt that the millions
Speaker 3: of Muslim invaders are changing Europe. And it's not just
Speaker 3: that Muhammad happens to be the number one baby name
Speaker 3: in the United Kingdom and has been climbing through the
Speaker 3: top ten for the past almost decades since twenty sixteen.
Speaker 3: It's that increasingly certain Muslim populations in Europe are not
Speaker 3: integrating into the host country. Here's a huge difference, and
Speaker 3: this does show up in the numbers that the European
Speaker 3: Union is willing to collect, because they're not willing to
Speaker 3: collect all the numbers. But from the numbers that the
Speaker 3: EU is willing to collect about what they refer to
Speaker 3: as migration, here's one that does show up in Europe today.
Speaker 3: In the EU twenty seven, if you are foreign born
Speaker 3: and if you're not foreign born from another EU state.
Speaker 3: In other words, you're not born in Switzerland and you're
Speaker 3: now living in Brussels. You're not born in Germany and
Speaker 3: you're now living in the UK. But if you're not
Speaker 3: foreign born from another EU state, in other words, if
Speaker 3: you're born outside the EU and you're a young person,
Speaker 3: you are twice as likely as young people from the EU,
Speaker 3: twice as likely as young people from the EU to
Speaker 3: be neither in employment in other words, to be unemployed,
Speaker 3: nor to be in education or any sort of training.
Speaker 3: You're just being, You're just living. I'm always fascinated in
Speaker 3: this country, whether it's something I see on television or
Speaker 3: I see when I'm driving around Colorado. People who seem
Speaker 3: to have nothing to do. And I'm not talking about,
Speaker 3: you know, your eighty five year old grandfather. I'm not
Speaker 3: talking about your obviously disabled, you know, crazy uncle. I'm
Speaker 3: talking about say eighteen to thirty five year olds or older,
Speaker 3: you know, maybe slut let's say eighteen to fifty five,
Speaker 3: who are just wandering around, or they're just sitting in
Speaker 3: their neighborhood, or they're just out. And I know, for example,
Speaker 3: I've got weird hours, right, so I'm here every morning,
Speaker 3: you know, way before six o'clock and then boom, I'm
Speaker 3: at here at ten o'clock. And while many people think
Speaker 3: that my day is done, no, my days not anywhere
Speaker 3: near done. But it also gives me the flexibility that,
Speaker 3: for example, I need to you know how much I
Speaker 3: love the garage, Well, I gotta go by and see
Speaker 3: Paul at the garage when I finish here, because i
Speaker 3: need a few things done on the beamer. And I'm
Speaker 3: also probably gonna go have the beamber detailed today because
Speaker 3: I'm gonna park it in the garage for a couple
Speaker 3: of days ago. I'm gonna be using the jeep for
Speaker 3: some other stuff, so, you know, so I'm gonna be
Speaker 3: out and about. Well, people may look at me and go,
Speaker 3: what's that old guy doing? Running around not doing it?
Speaker 3: Why is he outworking? So I get that people have
Speaker 3: different schedules, but to be blunt, there are certain areas
Speaker 3: that I would say are of a lower demographic where
Speaker 3: you can drive around and you'll find people loitering at
Speaker 3: the convenience store, loitering in just in it on the
Speaker 3: street block, not seemingly employed gainfully or doing anything. And
Speaker 3: my caveat is Okay, so maybe they work odd hours,
Speaker 3: but I don't really believe that because they just at
Speaker 3: any time of day you can find these groups of people.
Speaker 3: So going back to the EU, because this is where
Speaker 3: we can find some good stats on this again in
Speaker 3: Europe today, in the U twenty seventh, in the EU
Speaker 3: twenty seven, if you're foreign born, and if you're not
Speaker 3: foreign born from another EU state, if you're born outside
Speaker 3: the EU and you're a young person, you are twice
Speaker 3: as likely as a young person in the EU to
Speaker 3: be unemployed and not going to school or to any
Speaker 3: sort of training. You are much more likely to be
Speaker 3: what they describe in these EU stats as being outside
Speaker 3: of society. You're not a productive member of society. You're
Speaker 3: living off your leechs on society. You have not joined,
Speaker 3: you have not assimilated. Now that's not true of our immigrants,
Speaker 3: of our legal immigrants, you do not find that they
Speaker 3: are neither employed nor in education or training. They're actually
Speaker 3: doing that now in addition to be on a slow
Speaker 3: road to nowhere, neither in employment or in education or
Speaker 3: in training. And in fact, the EU actually has an
Speaker 3: acronym for that, neither in employment or in education and
Speaker 3: training need in ee T euro needs. So these are
Speaker 3: Europeans that are neither in employment nor in any sort
Speaker 3: of education or training euro needs. So I'm going to
Speaker 3: refer to euro needs for a minute. Eural needs are
Speaker 3: likely to nurture grievances, to complain more than their immigrant
Speaker 3: parents about prejudice, to perceive all these societal injustices directed
Speaker 3: their way. Everybody's against them, everybody's out to get them. Now, instinctively,
Speaker 3: if you've been paying attention, you know that's true. That
Speaker 3: in part is that's where the angry crowds of FAMAS
Speaker 3: supporters are coming from inside the United Kingdom or France
Speaker 3: or Germany or anywhere else for that matter. It may
Speaker 3: well be where the new found hostility to Israel and
Speaker 3: support for an institution in government, governance free Palestinian state
Speaker 3: is coming from. Now, I don't think we should have
Speaker 3: any doubt that this will, over time do anything but
Speaker 3: transform the Europe that we know into a Europe that
Speaker 3: we do not know. Now America is still different, at
Speaker 3: least for the moment, because I think that assimilation is
Speaker 3: still achievable, and the overwhelming cohorts from the New World,
Speaker 3: just Central and South America are not so terribly dissimilar
Speaker 3: from say, the Mexicans that dominated illegal immigration into the
Speaker 3: United States until about around two thousand and seven. But
Speaker 3: there are some critical differences that require our attention. And
Speaker 3: I want emphasized too that while I do believe this
Speaker 3: assimilation is still achievable, I actually think that our own
Speaker 3: government and all the NGOs that we fund, actually discourage
Speaker 3: assimilation because if you're not required to go into education
Speaker 3: or into a training program, if you're not required to work,
Speaker 3: because you get all of these freebies so that you
Speaker 3: can loiter around your neighborhood, become more isolated, and assimilation
Speaker 3: becomes less and less likely the more that goes month
Speaker 3: to month, year to year to year. So I would
Speaker 3: have described to you some of the numbers that in
Speaker 3: terms of legal immigrants were or foreign born people foreign
Speaker 3: born citizens. To put it precisely, America may never have
Speaker 3: had as high a percentage of immigrants in our now
Speaker 3: national population as we do right now. For example, going
Speaker 3: all the way back to eighteen fifty, there were about
Speaker 3: eight point seven percent of the some twenty two million
Speaker 3: people that were in the country, about eight point seven
Speaker 3: percent were immigrants, and that steadily rose through about nineteen
Speaker 3: ten to a high of about fourteen point seven percent.
Speaker 3: Between say nineteen hundred and nineteen twenty I have about
Speaker 3: fourteen almost fifteen percent, and then it just dropped all
Speaker 3: the way down to nineteen seventy when foreign born the
Speaker 3: percentage of foreign born people in this country decreased to
Speaker 3: the lowest ever four point seven percent, less than five percent.
Speaker 3: In nineteen seventy, foreign born numbers in millions was nine
Speaker 3: point six million. That was about four point seven percent
Speaker 3: of the population. Then from nineteen seventy through twenty twenty four,
Speaker 3: it is at a almost i would say sixty degree angle.
Speaker 3: The chart going almost straight up at a ninety degree
Speaker 3: not quite ninety degree, not forty five degrees, but somewhere
Speaker 3: when you know sixty to seventy degree angle. And from
Speaker 3: nineteen seventy, when they were about nine point six or
Speaker 3: nine point five million foreign born citizens in this country,
Speaker 3: it's skyrocketed to fifty one point four million. I'm talking
Speaker 3: about legal foreign born people who are now citizens. It's
Speaker 3: skyrocketed to fifty one point four million, which accounted to
Speaker 3: about fifteen point five percent of the population. There's an
Speaker 3: astounding number, and it's an astounding increase. And while America
Speaker 3: is different than Europe for the moment, and I do
Speaker 3: believe that some assimilation is still achievable, but not as
Speaker 3: long as the government can keeps putting up roadblocks and disincentives.
Speaker 3: Because it's two types. It's an actual roadblock because we
Speaker 3: don't put together or supply the necessary infrastructure for people
Speaker 3: to become legal citizens. We don't have enough immigration judges,
Speaker 3: we don't have enough enforcement officers, we don't have enough anything.
Speaker 3: So that's a roadblock. But there's also a disincentive. And
Speaker 3: the disincentive is why become a citizen? Because go back
Speaker 3: to the very end of the last hour, and I
Speaker 3: just mentioned I also happen to notice that ABC News
Speaker 3: carry that same story at the top of the hour
Speaker 3: that HHS is turning over the Medicaid personally identifying information
Speaker 3: of illegal aliens who are on Medicaid over to the
Speaker 3: Department of Homeland Security. Well, when you think about what
Speaker 3: that really is, those are people who are in the
Speaker 3: country illegally, who you are, at your expense, receiving medicaid.
Speaker 3: That's the disincentive. Why would you ever become a US citizen?
Speaker 3: Particular feear between the ages of eighteen and fifty five,
Speaker 3: where that would kick you off Medicaid. And now you
Speaker 3: have a job, and now you either have to use
Speaker 3: the company, you have to pay for the company provided
Speaker 3: insurance where you have to you have to get insurance
Speaker 3: on your own. It becomes inherently a disincentive to becoming
Speaker 3: a citizen. While while assimilation is achievable, we don't encourage.
Speaker 1: It at all at all. And in so far as
Speaker 1: education between legal immigrants and.
Speaker 3: Natural boor or American born citizens, those members are astonishing too.
Speaker 1: That's next, Michael.
Speaker 4: I agree, you come, Harry, you should get zero benefits.
Speaker 4: If you can't feed yourself, close yourself, put yourself in
Speaker 4: a house, tough, you have to leave, go back home.
Speaker 3: Remembered acts as both a barrier to assimilation and a
Speaker 3: disincentive to assimilation. And when you don't have assimilation, you
Speaker 3: have exactly what's going on in the United Kingdom, and
Speaker 3: that's the under destruction of their society. Same as true
Speaker 3: in France. You know, the French are so focused on
Speaker 3: their culture as they should be. They have a great culture,
Speaker 3: they have a great country. I mean there's some stupid
Speaker 3: things about it, but they do everything they can to
Speaker 3: preserve their culture everything from much like Italy does their
Speaker 3: cheeses and their wines and everything to make sure that
Speaker 3: they're authentic and that they're legit and that you know,
Speaker 3: you keep counterfeits out of the marketplace, and they and
Speaker 3: their way of life, whether you agree with it or not,
Speaker 3: their culture is their culture and they're very protective of it.
Speaker 3: We seem to just go the route that Germany's going,
Speaker 3: or Portugal is going, Spain's going, but in particular the
Speaker 3: United Kingdom's going, where the destruction of their culture will
Speaker 3: lead to the disintegration of our society. So let's think
Speaker 3: about this country, because we're still different, at least for
Speaker 3: the time being, there are critical differences that require our attention.
Speaker 3: Today's illegal aliens are increasingly not even high school educated.
Speaker 3: The data that I can find suggests that unlike American dropouts,
Speaker 3: these folks are in the workforce the American dropouts. They're
Speaker 3: in the workforce. They have a different work ethic even
Speaker 3: though they don't complete a high school education. But that said,
Speaker 3: it is notable that this cohort has even fewer skills
Speaker 3: than their predecessors. So what does that mean? So let's
Speaker 3: take another step back. One of the arguments that supporters
Speaker 3: of illegal immigration actually make is that by virtue of
Speaker 3: the nature of the tax system, these illegal aliens pour
Speaker 3: more into our nation's coffers than they take out. But
Speaker 3: that's not easy to reckon all the numbers. No matter
Speaker 3: how you slice it, illegals are a net burden on
Speaker 3: the national fisk. So I found a report, and here's
Speaker 3: what's in the report. There is considerable disagreement about the
Speaker 3: fiscal imp of immigration in the United States. There is
Speaker 3: little doubt that that net impact depends upon the age
Speaker 3: and educational attainment of immigrants. But calculating net present value
Speaker 3: of income, tax revenue and public benefits streams is difficult,
Speaker 3: not only for reasons of modeling complexity, but for the
Speaker 3: assumptions and body as we see here, Daniel D. Martine
Speaker 3: of the Manhattan Institute and David Beer the Cato Institute
Speaker 3: arrive at dramatically different estimates of the net fiscal impact
Speaker 3: of immigration by age and education of immigrant.
Speaker 1: Cohorts, even though their work.
Speaker 3: Commences at the same starting point and relies on the
Speaker 3: same data sources. Both agree, however, that migrants with no
Speaker 3: more than a high school degree when taken as a whole,
Speaker 3: costs the country more in public benefits than they can
Speaker 3: contribute in taxes. So the Manhattan Institute and CATO, even
Speaker 3: though they wander around different ways as they go through
Speaker 3: their study, come to the same conclusion that illegal aliens
Speaker 3: that don't have anything other than or less than a
Speaker 3: high school degree, taken as a whole, costs the country
Speaker 3: more in public benefits than they contribute in taxes. Now,
Speaker 3: am I being nerdy? Of course I'm nerdy. But does
Speaker 3: it create an uglier picture of illegal immigration? Then we've
Speaker 3: been led to believe by the cabal over the years,
Speaker 3: And the answer is yes, of course it does. But
Speaker 3: there's an even more important byproduct of the Biden wave
Speaker 3: of all these illegal aliens. If you like me and
Speaker 3: these studies believe that you know legal immigration is is
Speaker 3: good and great good for our country, and that diversity
Speaker 3: is actually a strength, and that we should have a better,
Speaker 3: stronger system of legal immigration that continues to sustain the country,
Speaker 3: then you ought to know that Biden screwed us, or
Speaker 3: whoever it was rating the country screwed us and screwed
Speaker 3: us big time. Support for legal migration, legal immigration, immigration
Speaker 3: to the country has dropped like a like a brickoff
Speaker 3: of building. And the cause of that drop is the
Speaker 3: unrestricted open border that prevailed when you know, demented Joe
Speaker 3: was president. Now, is that the right reaction? Maybe not,
Speaker 3: but it's far from surprising. And you can bet your
Speaker 3: bottom dollar that the riots that are spreading from the
Speaker 3: People's Democratic Republic of California, for example, are not going
Speaker 3: to help.
Speaker 1: This is.
Speaker 3: These findings are eye opening. We now have more a
Speaker 3: higher proportion of foreign born in the United States, mainly
Speaker 3: legal but also including illegal. We have a higher proportion
Speaker 3: of foreign born in the United States than we even
Speaker 3: had it back in the eighteen nineties. We've never been
Speaker 3: where we are now in terms of the total proportion
Speaker 3: of foreign born in this country. And another thing which
Speaker 3: is important is that legal immigrants have a higher educational
Speaker 3: profile than native born Americans and certainly more than illegal aliens.
Speaker 3: Illegal aliens a much lower educational profile. And then another
Speaker 3: point to emphasize is that the United States is an
Speaker 3: economy that really does depend upon foreign born labor, including
Speaker 3: sadly illegal labor, and just snapping our fingers and saying
Speaker 3: be gone is not going to be quite as easy.
Speaker 3: From an economic standpoint, as we might think the surge
Speaker 3: of the illegal immigration, the border chaos that was deliberately allowed,
Speaker 3: deliberately instigated border chaos, and the Biden administration had a
Speaker 3: huge impact on public support for all immigration, including legal immigration.
Speaker 3: And I don't know that we could have done a
Speaker 3: much more brilliant job of actually poisoning the average American
Speaker 3: support for legal immigration than what Biden did over the
Speaker 3: last four years. And that's going to take some repairing,
Speaker 3: and it's going to and I wanted to be repaired
Speaker 3: because I do believe that. Look, we go back to
Speaker 3: the point I made at the very beginning of the
Speaker 3: hour about if you're an exceptionally smart person anywhere in
Speaker 3: the world and you have an idea for an invention,
Speaker 3: or you maybe you already have a small company in
Speaker 3: some foreign country, but you know that you can make
Speaker 3: that company bigger, stronger. You just need to do some innovation.
Speaker 3: There are only two places in the world that those
Speaker 3: people want to go, Switzerland and the United States. Now
Speaker 3: why would that be Well, primarily one, We're the largest
Speaker 3: economy in the world. So if you're going to come here,
Speaker 3: we mostly and I emphasize the word mostly, make it
Speaker 3: easy for you to come here and to innovate and
Speaker 3: to grow and become as big as you want to.
Speaker 3: And then you can take that company, and while you
Speaker 3: may still stay in the United States, you can take
Speaker 3: whatever product or services that company provides, make it international,
Speaker 3: make a transnational, and you can take it back to
Speaker 3: your small, little crabhole country that you came from, and
Speaker 3: you can improve your own country while making this country
Speaker 3: even stronger itself. The same is true in Switzerland too.
Speaker 3: It's it's just difficult to find reliable data about all
Speaker 3: of this stuff, and using whatever AI apps that I
Speaker 3: use to try to find that, it takes time and
Speaker 3: effort to do it. But with the wave of hostility
Speaker 3: to immigration, legal and illegal right now, which does seem
Speaker 3: like an anomaly, you you know, think back historically. I
Speaker 3: always think going back historically is important. We had a
Speaker 3: huge surge of legal immigration in the country in the
Speaker 3: first Gilded Age eighteen eighties, eighteen nineties, nineteen hundreds. At
Speaker 3: the same time that we had that huge surge, we
Speaker 3: also had even at that time, growing anti migration movements,
Speaker 3: and we came within a hair of basically stopping foreign
Speaker 3: immigration into the country in nineteen oh five, we came
Speaker 3: very close to it what finally stopped foreign immigration into
Speaker 3: the country World War One, but then after the war
Speaker 3: didn't let up.
Speaker 1: After the war.
Speaker 3: In the early nineteen twenties, we had very strict legislation,
Speaker 3: mostly a lot of it's still in effect, limiting foreign
Speaker 3: immigration in the United States that's never been revisited or
Speaker 3: changed until the mid nineteen sixties. What we're living with
Speaker 3: now didn't start until really the nineteen seventies after that legislation.
Speaker 3: But again, those who came here legally after that change
Speaker 3: in legislation have proved to be incredibly productive citizens.
Speaker 1: That we ought to be welcoming more of.
Speaker 3: But we're too busy right now because of the tidal
Speaker 3: wave of illegal immigration. We're not focused on trying to
Speaker 3: make certain that the legal pathway for those people that
Speaker 3: we really do want to come here have the resources
Speaker 3: and that we have the infrastructure in place that would
Speaker 3: allow them to come here. And I think it's something
Speaker 3: that Trump needs to focus on as much as deporting
Speaker 3: the worst of the worst and continuing the success and
Speaker 3: starting in stopping the flow of illegal immigration of the country.
Speaker 3: At the same time. The title is deportation Flights reach
Speaker 3: highest level under Trump so far, and it goes back
Speaker 3: to May of twenty four when it showed these are
Speaker 3: number of flights per week and it was just slightly
Speaker 3: more than twenty back in May of twenty twenty twenty four,
Speaker 3: and then it bumps up to about forty flights. It
Speaker 3: almost doubled to forty flights. And I would say it
Speaker 3: bounced around between twenty and forty from May of twenty
Speaker 3: twenty four through January of this year, and then, for
Speaker 3: whatever reason, it dropped off significantly until May, and then
Speaker 3: it started to dramatically increase. Where now the latest government
Speaker 3: data shows that the number of daily deporties averages about
Speaker 3: eight hundred and fifty per day. In that's in the
Speaker 3: first two weeks of May, the number of flights was
Speaker 3: about fifty. So obviously we're starting to increase the numbers now.
Speaker 3: According to data collected by The New York Times and others,
Speaker 3: ICE conducted one hundred and ninety deportation flights in May,
Speaker 3: more than any months since September twenty one, oney eighty
Speaker 3: three total flights including domestic transfers returns from deportations, more
Speaker 3: than in any month since at least the first Trump administration,
Speaker 3: and the rests are beginning to spike. Two The top
Speaker 3: deportation destination since Trump took office Guatemala at one hundred
Speaker 3: and forty two, Honduras one sixteen, Mexico one hundred and one,
Speaker 3: and then it drops significantly. El Salvador, Ecuador, Venezuela to Nicaraugua,
Speaker 3: Dominican Republic.
Speaker 1: Peru, and Brazil.
Speaker 3: Two removals removal flights a week now regularly travel to
Speaker 3: Venezuela after Maduro, under pressure from Trump, agreed to start
Speaker 3: accepting deportees and the Supreme Court obviously ruled that he
Speaker 3: could do that, But the flights moving detainees around the
Speaker 3: country have also increased.
Speaker 1: So there's all this movement going on. And I'm all
Speaker 1: for all of this movie.
Speaker 3: Whether you're moving them to you know, the appropriate detention facility,
Speaker 3: or you're deporting them out of the country, whatever you're doing,
Speaker 3: I'm all for it. But when you recognize that if
Speaker 3: we have twenty million illegal aliens in the country, you know,
Speaker 3: I've seen different calculations done about you know, it'll be
Speaker 3: fifty years before we can get all those people out,
Speaker 3: or twenty five years, depending on who's doing the calculation
Speaker 3: and all the variables they put in the point though,
Speaker 3: is this, what are we going to do with all
Speaker 3: these people? Because the real world says we probably will
Speaker 3: not in our lifetime ever get all of them out,
Speaker 3: and many of them will grow old and die before
Speaker 3: we can get them out. Some may actually go on
Speaker 3: to be actually productive citizens that we.
Speaker 1: Want to keep here.
Speaker 3: The question is what do we do with them? What
Speaker 3: do we create a path to citizenship or do we
Speaker 3: double down on our efforts to deport knowing that it's
Speaker 3: a it's amount everest that will never reach the pinnacle.
Speaker 3: Think about that, because somewhere, somehow we have to deal
Speaker 3: with