Speaker 1: You created everything. Let's put a powerful being you are.
Speaker 2: You did these things, but now you're in a human body,
Speaker 2: you forget the power you have.
Speaker 1: Welcome to metamistics, where you don't know what you don't know.
Speaker 1: My name's Jonathan, and joining me as always is my
Speaker 1: brother Cody. What a do?
Speaker 3: What's up?
Speaker 4: Man?
Speaker 3: Close your eyes, clear your mind, and look past the
Speaker 3: physical waw Welcome back to metamistics, where distance is an illusion.
Speaker 3: In remote viewing is reality.
Speaker 1: Indeed it is. Indeed it is. Well, that's the crazy
Speaker 1: thing about all of this. So obviously if you clicked
Speaker 1: on the show, you saw by the title that we're
Speaker 1: going to be talking about remote viewing today. But the
Speaker 1: cool thing is is that I was reading an article
Speaker 1: by the main guy. He's not remote viewer number one.
Speaker 1: That would be Joseph mcmonagle, which we're going to go over.
Speaker 1: You know him in some of his work, But really
Speaker 1: the true first remote viewer was Ingo Swan, and INGOs
Speaker 1: Swan wrote like a training manual on how to do
Speaker 1: all this kind of stuff. Ingo Swan was working over
Speaker 1: at the at SRI, which is the Stanford Research Institute
Speaker 1: back in the seventies, and that's actually SRI and the
Speaker 1: CIA were working basically hand in hand, and that's how
Speaker 1: all of this stuff kind of came to like came
Speaker 1: to a button was you know, the Stanford Research Institute
Speaker 1: was working hand in hand with the CIA, so then
Speaker 1: they started taking on a bigger role. And then the
Speaker 1: procureur of the CIA, there was this guy that was
Speaker 1: working in the military. He was working in the army.
Speaker 1: That's where you get Joseph mcmonagall. So the CIA can
Speaker 1: technically claim Joseph mcmonagall as remote viewer number one, a
Speaker 1: remote viewer zero, whatever they call him. But it was
Speaker 1: really Ingo Swan was the one that was teaching it
Speaker 1: at the Stanford Research Institute. Man, you know what he said,
Speaker 1: Ingo Swan, And we'll get into it, but he said,
Speaker 1: when you close your eyes, you have to imagine that
Speaker 1: the entire world is a matrix, and this matrix is
Speaker 1: composed of tiny bits of information, and depending upon your
Speaker 1: intention and attention, that will somehow bring information to you.
Speaker 1: Because technically all you are is bits of information and energy,
Speaker 1: and all you're looking for is bits of information and energy.
Speaker 1: So look at yourself almost like a hard drive, trying
Speaker 1: to you know, scroll on the internet for a bit
Speaker 1: of specific information, Like, it's not that crazy. If you know,
Speaker 1: if you pull up Safari or Google or Duck dug
Speaker 1: or whatever browser you use, it's not that crazy for
Speaker 1: you to type something in and be able to find
Speaker 1: it on a computer. Right. And basically, what Ingo Swan
Speaker 1: was saying back in the seventies was that our minds
Speaker 1: are the exact same and it takes practice, but dude,
Speaker 1: it's amazing. I mean they were able to like zero
Speaker 1: in on certain spots that there's no way out of
Speaker 1: all of the possibilities. There's no way you could have
Speaker 1: guessed that. Now, the important thing here that whenever you're
Speaker 1: remote viewing, and we're going to get to it, is
Speaker 1: that you don't want to think. And it sounds kind
Speaker 1: of intuitive, but this is a psychic kind of thing.
Speaker 1: You know. Technically, remote viewing is like a psychic power
Speaker 1: and everybody can do it. Literally, everybody will tell you that.
Speaker 1: Everybody that has ever remote viewed, everybody that's ever been
Speaker 1: a psychic, everybody that you know astro projects or has
Speaker 1: that of body experiences or whatever like whatever the case
Speaker 1: may be. It's all some kind we call it. But
Speaker 1: that's just because there's no other word to really call it.
Speaker 1: You can call it paranormal, you can just say sigh
Speaker 1: ability or what have you. I mean, I probably the
Speaker 1: easiest way to say is that it's intuitive, you know,
Speaker 1: and we're all intuitive, we all have that, right, And
Speaker 1: so that's really what all of this is about, is
Speaker 1: about learning how to turn off your thinking mind. Because remember,
Speaker 1: your thinking mind is your left brain, that's your logical brain.
Speaker 1: This this practice requires your right brain. Okay, so that
Speaker 1: is your imaginative, that is your meditative, that is your
Speaker 1: at rest brain. That is where the information is going
Speaker 1: to come if you're thinking about it and you're trying
Speaker 1: to be logical about it, and you're like, okay, well
Speaker 1: I'm gonna guess what's in your pocket? Right, like if
Speaker 1: you were to tell me. And we have a video
Speaker 1: on that with I think it was Ngo Swan or
Speaker 1: one of the Russell targ I think, but he was
Speaker 1: trying to show somebody like how to remote view and
Speaker 1: he goes, he goes, I want you to close your
Speaker 1: eyes and I want you to tell me what is
Speaker 1: the item that is in my pocket? And he goes,
Speaker 1: this is all the training you'll ever need. He goes,
Speaker 1: what is the what is the item that's in my pocket?
Speaker 1: And he goes, don't use your brain, don't think, just
Speaker 1: close your close your eyes and allow information to pop up.
Speaker 1: And that's that's the secret. You're setting an intention, all right,
Speaker 1: I want to know what's in that guy's pocket. That's
Speaker 1: the intention. That's it. Set and forget. You set the
Speaker 1: intention and allow your right brain to be able to
Speaker 1: perceive this matrix style information. After a while, you'll you'll
Speaker 1: notice that like, oh, I wasn't even thinking about this.
Speaker 1: Why did this just pop into my mind? It seems random,
Speaker 1: you know, or you might feel a random way, you
Speaker 1: might think a random way. You might think like a crazy, wild,
Speaker 1: out of the blue thought. But that is going to
Speaker 1: be a lie little nugget of information that you need.
Speaker 1: It's not going to be the whole entire part of it.
Speaker 1: And most most people will say, well, look, whenever you're
Speaker 1: remote viewing, don't try and picture the entirety of whatever
Speaker 1: it is. Like just what allow whatever comes to you
Speaker 1: come to you. You don't need to worry about the
Speaker 1: full picture like you could be looking at maybe somebody
Speaker 1: tells you, all right, I want you to remote view
Speaker 1: this this location and give them these coordinates, and those
Speaker 1: coordinates the other person doesn't know those coordinates. Let's say,
Speaker 1: are the Empire State building. Okay, we all know what
Speaker 1: the Empire State Building looks like, right, But if you
Speaker 1: were to close your eyes and you're a beginner at
Speaker 1: remote viewing, you might just see what is this like
Speaker 1: a I don't know, it looks like gray. You know,
Speaker 1: you might not be able to get the entire picture,
Speaker 1: but the fact that you saw gray with maybe some
Speaker 1: lines in it, you know, like, that's a hit. That's
Speaker 1: a win. That's a small win. But at least you
Speaker 1: were able to catch on to something. And that's all
Speaker 1: we're trying to do. We're just trying to allow our
Speaker 1: mind to be able to do what it does. And
Speaker 1: that's the beauty of it.
Speaker 3: Like weak in small bits.
Speaker 1: We have this mechanism. We just forget how to use
Speaker 1: it because we're so damn logical. We're so damned left brain.
Speaker 1: We want to think things into existence, and to be honest,
Speaker 1: that's actually the secret about how psychics work too. They're
Speaker 1: not thinking logically like oh, I wonder where that that
Speaker 1: little girl ran away to or whatever. You know, it's
Speaker 1: not like that. It's like you shut off your mind,
Speaker 1: you get to like a comfortable, safe place, just as
Speaker 1: you would in meditation, and you allow information to come
Speaker 1: to you. And that's it. It's and it seems simple,
Speaker 1: but it ain't easy because you know, we have sixty
Speaker 1: thousand thoughts a day, most of them were entirely unaware
Speaker 1: of and so it takes a little bit of practice
Speaker 1: because it's you're trying to think with a brain that
Speaker 1: you're not used to thinking with, you know. And that's
Speaker 1: just the material wheld we live in. We don't We
Speaker 1: almost don't even need our right brain in the material world,
Speaker 1: so to say, I mean, of course we do, but
Speaker 1: most people operate with their with their logical thinking brain,
Speaker 1: which I mean, you gotta do what you gotta do
Speaker 1: to survive. So anyway, all right, so I have a
Speaker 1: couple of articles that I wanted to read, and you're gonna,
Speaker 1: actually you're gonna have your mind blown at some of
Speaker 1: the people that are well known for being remote viewers.
Speaker 1: I actually have. This is actually an an article from
Speaker 1: Gaya that I pulled up, and you know what, I'll
Speaker 1: just share the screen in that way if everybody else
Speaker 1: wants to be able to see the articles. That I'm reading.
Speaker 1: At everything, you'll be able to see what we're talking
Speaker 1: about here. This first article, like I said, it's from Gaia,
Speaker 1: which great website if anybody's ever curious about that kind
Speaker 1: of stuff. Of course, not everything is going to give
Speaker 1: be one hundred percent right on here. That's the thing
Speaker 1: with Gaya is sometimes they be doing scan into this shit.
Speaker 1: But you can never trust anything one That's what I believe,
Speaker 1: like maybe ninety nine percent. But you start trusting things
Speaker 1: one hundred percent, it's like you're setting yourself up, you know.
Speaker 1: It says what is remote viewing? Declassifying a psychic phenomena,
Speaker 1: so remote viewing is the psychic ability to acquire accurate
Speaker 1: information about a distant or non local place, person, or
Speaker 1: event without using your physical senses or any other obvious means.
Speaker 1: It's associated with the idea of clairvoyance, seemingly being able
Speaker 1: to spontaneously know something without actually knowing how you got
Speaker 1: the information. It's also sometimes called anomaloust cognition or second site.
Speaker 1: And actually this weekend they have the second annual PI
Speaker 1: Games PSI Games, which is like PSI psychic abilities that
Speaker 1: kind of stuff, And we actually had on the winner
Speaker 1: of that of those SI Games from last year. His
Speaker 1: name is Ryan Dabian. What he does is is that
Speaker 1: he puts on like this, this blindfold. It's actually it's
Speaker 1: called a mindfold essentially, but you're completely blacking out your eyes.
Speaker 1: And dude, he'll put little patches over his eyeballs, then
Speaker 1: put that thing over and then put like a fucking pillowcase.
Speaker 1: Like he can't he can't see anything right, and it's
Speaker 1: he's able to. I'll you know, let's say I want
Speaker 1: to hold up a card, right, and let's say I
Speaker 1: just hold this card up. He can't see Jack Diddley squat, Okay,
Speaker 1: not with his eyeballs, but he's able to describe exactly
Speaker 1: what's on this card. He's never even seen this card before,
Speaker 1: and he would be able to read it. He'll be
Speaker 1: able to see this tiny little print. He would be
Speaker 1: able to read this with his eyes closed. This is
Speaker 1: the guy that won the SI Games last year, and
Speaker 1: I hope he I hope he wins it again this
Speaker 1: year because he's a good dude. Yeah, me and Sean
Speaker 1: had him. All our fucking minds were blown. It was like,
Speaker 1: I bet, how are you able to do that? And
Speaker 1: it's not even just like stuff like that.
Speaker 3: Bro.
Speaker 1: He had you know, like those little kids toys, the
Speaker 1: really little baby toys where you got to put the
Speaker 1: colors into the right color compartment kind of thing, and
Speaker 1: you're like, all the yellows go with the yellow compartment,
Speaker 1: all the greens go in the green compartment. He can't
Speaker 1: see anything, bro, And yet he was able to put
Speaker 1: all the blues with the blues, all the reds with
Speaker 1: the reds, all the yellows with the yellows, all the
Speaker 1: greens with the greens, every single one of them.
Speaker 3: Just by feeling the marker or whatever.
Speaker 1: No, they're all the same shape. Like he can't. He can't.
Speaker 1: There is no sensation of feel. It's all like intuitive,
Speaker 1: which is nuts, like whenever you see it. Honestly, my
Speaker 1: first time I saw it, I was like, all right,
Speaker 1: there's got to be a way, Like maybe somebody's whispering
Speaker 1: to him. Maybe you know what I mean, Maybe it's
Speaker 1: edited video. Then I had the fucking guy on and
Speaker 1: he was teaching me and Sean how to do it,
Speaker 1: and I'm like okay, and then he goes and wins
Speaker 1: the side game, so hopefully he uh, he can rain
Speaker 1: again this weekend. I think it's this weekend coming up.
Speaker 1: I mean, these abilities are something that you can learn,
Speaker 1: and that's what he says, like, you gotta whenever you're
Speaker 1: trying to like master one of these like kind of
Speaker 1: clairvoyant ability, psychic abilities, it's something that you got to
Speaker 1: train at every day, even if it's only even if
Speaker 1: it's only like ten minutes, like ten minutes a day,
Speaker 1: and it might take a little while, maybe it takes
Speaker 1: a month, maybe it takes a couple months. But after
Speaker 1: a while, you're gonna start blowing people's minds and people
Speaker 1: are gonna start calling you demonic. Like that's just the
Speaker 1: way it goes. You know, it's crazy. But anyway, all right,
Speaker 1: let's get back over to it. Oh that's why I
Speaker 1: brought him up, because it's called second sight. There's actually
Speaker 1: this this woman who is doing very similar work, except
Speaker 1: for she's an absolute fucking stud. He beat her, which
Speaker 1: blew my mind. But her name is Dahalia Burgoyne, I think,
Speaker 1: and dude, she's so good at it to where she'll
Speaker 1: cover every thing up, and she's teaching blind people how
Speaker 1: to see without their eyes, like literally blind people, like
Speaker 1: teaching them this ability to where they can finally see
Speaker 1: for the first time. Oh, it is amazing. Bro. What's
Speaker 1: even crazier is is that you could close a book.
Speaker 1: Let's say you hold a book up right. This is
Speaker 1: the craziest part. You could hold up a book and
Speaker 1: close it and say, all right, Dahlia, what is on
Speaker 1: page three hundred and forty nine of this book that
Speaker 1: you've never read? She would start reading it. Bro starts
Speaker 1: reading it. Why, Yes, that's what I'm saying, dude, Like
Speaker 1: it's all so nuts, it's almost unbelievable. But I mean
Speaker 1: it's a real thing, dude, it really is.
Speaker 3: Wow, we got to see some of that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, maybe we will. Well, I'm actually gonna I was.
Speaker 1: I was thinking about having them on, but I know
Speaker 1: that he's probably training for this weekend with the side games.
Speaker 1: I think it's this weekend, So maybe next week we'll
Speaker 1: try and get him on and be like, dude, I
Speaker 1: don't even care if you want, Like, he's such an
Speaker 1: entertaining guy, you're gonna love him either way. Like he's
Speaker 1: got such a motor mouth on him too. That motherfucker
Speaker 1: can talk. I remember whenever me and Sean had him on.
Speaker 1: I don't even think we talked at all the entire episode.
Speaker 1: He was just like going and he's like one of
Speaker 1: those he's really really hyper about everything, and because he
Speaker 1: gets so excited and very knowledgeable about it and everything.
Speaker 1: But he'll teach you, he'll teach you how to do
Speaker 1: it like it's crazy.
Speaker 5: Man.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I agree. So anyhow, it's as many of us
Speaker 1: experience this from time to time as an intuitive flash
Speaker 1: of insight that turns out to be correct. Many well
Speaker 1: known entrepreneurs and business people like George Soros wait till
Speaker 1: you hear some of these names. Entrepreneurs and business people
Speaker 1: like George Soros, Conrad Hilton, Thomas Alva Edison, and Akia
Speaker 1: Akio Morita have attributed their business success to this ability.
Speaker 1: So they were popularized and got to where they got
Speaker 1: to because they did some kind of remote viewing, some
Speaker 1: kind of psychic thing. Right, So just to go over
Speaker 1: some of these names, George Soros, I mean, you ask
Speaker 1: any conspiracy theorists. Everybody hates him because what he does
Speaker 1: is that he goes into certain economies and bankrupts their
Speaker 1: currency and which basically bankrupt countries. He's actually like legit,
Speaker 1: he's evil grow from despicable me like in real life
Speaker 1: but he's a super rich billionaire, so I mean got
Speaker 1: to give it to him. Then you got Conrad Hilton.
Speaker 1: Now I don't know if you know that name, but
Speaker 1: Conrad Hilton was the one that created all the Hilton hotels. Right.
Speaker 1: Then you have Thomas I don't know why they included
Speaker 1: Alva Edison. That's Thomas Edison created the fucking light bulb.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 1: Then you have or allegedly created the light bulbs. Supposedly
Speaker 1: there's some patent problems in there, but anyway, everybody knows
Speaker 1: who Thomas Senison is.
Speaker 4: And then A.
Speaker 1: Kio Morita is the founder of Sony. Right, So all
Speaker 1: of these these are just some of the big names
Speaker 1: who have been able to master this amazing ability. Right,
Speaker 1: And it says that we've all seen natural psychics perform
Speaker 1: seemingly amazing feats of mental skill on TV as well.
Speaker 1: So the difference between natural psychic receptivity and remote viewing
Speaker 1: is that the latter is a trained skill, a controlled
Speaker 1: process that the average person can learn to do to
Speaker 1: some degree. This ability seems to be distributed in the
Speaker 1: human population and varying degrees, just like a musical skill.
Speaker 1: Some people are really good at playing an instrument, but
Speaker 1: almost anyone can hum a tune or whistle. So basically
Speaker 1: they're saying, anybody can really learn this technique and learn
Speaker 1: like this fucking superpower. There's just going to be varying
Speaker 1: degrees of it, which you know, there's varying degrees of
Speaker 1: all kinds of you know, like for example, like if
Speaker 1: you if you were to compare the UFC fighters, uh
Speaker 1: from whenever they first started compared to like today's UFC
Speaker 1: like two thousand and five's UFC fighters were absolute trash
Speaker 1: compared to twenty twenty six as UFC fighters. Right, Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: that's just how it's gonna be. And so there's gonna
Speaker 1: be varying degrees the longer you work with it and
Speaker 1: the longer it's around and that kind of stuff.
Speaker 3: But it it is a sense that we all have
Speaker 3: from the jump, like I'm not very good at basketball,
Speaker 3: but I can make a shot or two.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah, that's what I'm saying. Everybody has varying degrees.
Speaker 1: You know, I'll look really good whenever I'm trying to
Speaker 1: dunk on a six year old, you know, but put
Speaker 1: me up against Lebron James, I would be I would
Speaker 1: take it as a win if I was to get
Speaker 1: one bucket on them, right, you know, agreed. So it
Speaker 1: says remote viewing is the oh wait, had already read
Speaker 1: that part. So the history of remote viewing program. This
Speaker 1: is where it gets interesting because there are gonna be
Speaker 1: people out there that'll say, well, remote viewing, that's fake
Speaker 1: and I don't believe in that, and that's not real.
Speaker 1: Da da da da da. But the CIA invested twenty
Speaker 1: years of research into it, at least twenty years. I think.
Speaker 1: To even say that they're not doing it anymore is
Speaker 1: actually hysterical to me, because if you found out how
Speaker 1: to absolutely like master this skill, why would you stop
Speaker 1: using it? I don't know. That's just how I look
Speaker 1: at it. Yeah, yeah, but it says remote viewing in
Speaker 1: modern times. Modern times originates from the US government's interest
Speaker 1: in psychic espionage during the Cold War with the Soviet Union.
Speaker 1: Back during the World War Two, the Soviets had heard
Speaker 1: rumors that the US military was using psychic spies and
Speaker 1: communications at sea. Well, it's not clear whether this was
Speaker 1: true or not, the Soviets believed and started their own
Speaker 1: psychic training within their military and intelligence programs many decades ago.
Speaker 1: The US government learned of this program and in the
Speaker 1: early nineteen seventies decided to create a remote viewing CIA
Speaker 1: training program. So that's what's fascinating about it is is
Speaker 1: that the reason why it was started among the Soviets
Speaker 1: over there in Russia was because they heard rumors, rumors
Speaker 1: that we were doing it, and then we heard that
Speaker 1: they were doing it, so we decided to start ours.
Speaker 1: So somebody started this fucking rumor, and nobody's exactly sure
Speaker 1: about who really started it. But it is interesting because
Speaker 1: before the CIA had really gotten a hold of the
Speaker 1: remote viewing practices and whatnot, it was being practiced for
Speaker 1: at least a decade over at the Stanford Research Institute,
Speaker 1: so that's probably where you know it leaked from. But
Speaker 1: I don't know. It's pretty fascinating. So now we're going
Speaker 1: to get over to the Stanford Research Institute. Go ahead.
Speaker 3: I was just going to say, like, they want to
Speaker 3: go to the Moon, so we want to go to
Speaker 3: the moon. They come up with remote viewing, we want
Speaker 3: to do it, you know, but we don't want to
Speaker 3: be behind mm hmmm. So it makes sense, you know.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, I mean it's all about like you know,
Speaker 1: and the sick part is is that everybody's always looking
Speaker 1: to use something as a militaristic tool, you know, not
Speaker 1: to better humanity, not to like evolve humanity at all.
Speaker 1: It's more so, how can I use this as a
Speaker 1: weapon against my enemies? It's so barbaric to me, you know,
Speaker 1: Like why are we so worried about having all of
Speaker 1: these like crazy tools and crazy weapons to only use
Speaker 1: for the military. It's like, dude, we got nuclear bombs.
Speaker 1: There's literally nothing more powerful than that, right, Like, if
Speaker 1: you set off a nuke somewhere, you won, Like that's
Speaker 1: I mean, you won and you lost at the same time,
Speaker 1: to be honest with you, but like that's already the
Speaker 1: most powerful weapon out there allegedly. I don't know. I
Speaker 1: I'm not even gonna go into that point. Is is
Speaker 1: that why has everything always got to be used as
Speaker 1: some kind of weapon and not taught to the American people,
Speaker 1: or the Russian people, or the African people, or the
Speaker 1: Australian people or whatever. Right, Like, we should be able
Speaker 1: to learn this and evolve as a humanity rather than
Speaker 1: just keeping it hush hush and using it as a
Speaker 1: secret and using it only to battle against our enemies
Speaker 1: like I don't know, but hey, maybe that's why we're
Speaker 1: still around is because they're still a military I don't
Speaker 1: know anyway, So the Stanford Research Institute remote viewing experiments.
Speaker 1: So money and resources were given by the CIA to
Speaker 1: Stanford Research Institute, located on the campus of Stanford University
Speaker 1: at the time, to test the possibility of remote viewing.
Speaker 1: The goal was to prove that psychic functioning was real.
Speaker 1: No one wanted it to exist. It was the last
Speaker 1: thing the military establishment wanted to worry about, especially if
Speaker 1: it was a new Soviet threat. Then you had physicists
Speaker 1: like Russell Targ and how put Off working at USUR
Speaker 1: I were tasked with determining whether extrasensory perception or ESP
Speaker 1: and related phenomena were real or not, known as parapsychology.
Speaker 1: During their parapsychological research, Targ and put Off set about
Speaker 1: to locate some natural psychics and test them. Their first
Speaker 1: subject was an artist, psychic and scientists known as Ingo
Speaker 1: Swan of New York City, who had demonstrated an ability
Speaker 1: to accurately remote view weather in various American cities. He
Speaker 1: was remote viewing the weather in different cities across America.
Speaker 1: Holy shit, crazy right. It says that he also published
Speaker 1: some articles about ESP and psychokinesis, which is the ability
Speaker 1: to mentally affect distant objects. Think about that.
Speaker 3: Think about that, like to change something? Is that what
Speaker 3: that means?
Speaker 1: Like to alter it? To mentally affect a distant objects?
Speaker 1: So all right, so let's say that you're the psychoconesis guy, right,
Speaker 1: and you come up with the idea I'm gonna rip
Speaker 1: that fucking highlighter out of Jonathan's hand. I'm gonna make
Speaker 1: it fall to the ground. As soon as you had
Speaker 1: that thought, and if you had that ability, I would
Speaker 1: be like, what is going on?
Speaker 4: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Yeah, So it's like stuff like that. It's like it's Matilda.
Speaker 1: Shit is really what it is? Remember Matilda, she was
Speaker 1: always moving shit with her mind. Yeah, that's that's psychokinesis.
Speaker 1: So anyway, uh when so he was working with the
Speaker 1: psycho psychokinesis and ESP whenever he worked with researcher Gertrude
Speaker 1: Schmiedler of City College and the American Society for Psychical Research.
Speaker 1: Working with Schmiedler, that's a funny last name. Sounds kind
Speaker 1: of Jewish. Actually, Swan had shown off that he had
Speaker 1: shown that he could affect the temperature of thermost stores
Speaker 1: and insulated therma thermis canisters twenty five feet away from him. So,
Speaker 1: at a friend's request, Swan sent his published findings to
Speaker 1: put Off, who asked Swan to come to SRI and
Speaker 1: demonstrate his abilities. The first thing they had Swan do
Speaker 1: was to see if he could affect a super sensitive
Speaker 1: electromagnetically shielded quark detector buried five feet underground in a
Speaker 1: cement floor. That was his first test over at SRI. Right,
Speaker 1: every time, put Off asked Swan to think about the detector,
Speaker 1: which is used to detect sub atomic particles. So this
Speaker 1: is like high degree tools. Right, the readings from the
Speaker 1: device would noticeably deviate from the baseline readings. Put Off
Speaker 1: was convinced that Swan had special abilities, and so the
Speaker 1: program and so the program to test and develop remote
Speaker 1: viewing began. So just the fact that he was able
Speaker 1: to affect something that was five feet underground covered by cement,
Speaker 1: that's how this whole program got started and was funded
Speaker 1: by the CIA.
Speaker 3: Yeah that's unreal.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, so did he do it? Yeah, he did it. Oh,
Speaker 1: that's how they were able to start the whole program
Speaker 1: because he convinced Russell targ or no, I'm sorry, he
Speaker 1: convinced how put off that you know, the the readings
Speaker 1: from the device would were at least deviating from the
Speaker 1: baseline readings. So that means no telling exactly how much
Speaker 1: he was affecting it, but just the simple fact of
Speaker 1: like it was being affected. Whenever he was asked to
Speaker 1: affect it, hey say less, you know, right, So it
Speaker 1: says at first they they had Ingo Swan view objects
Speaker 1: in a box. This was a practice that he was
Speaker 1: good at but quickly became bored with. Swan said to them,
Speaker 1: I can view anything in the universe. This is a
Speaker 1: trivialization of my abilities. So he's getting like cocky now right,
Speaker 1: He's like, you just want me to see into a box?
Speaker 1: Like come on, dude, Like they're literally closing things into
Speaker 1: a box. He can't see them, he can't sit like
Speaker 1: he doesn't know what was, you know, being put in there.
Speaker 1: And he was just guessing it right every single time,
Speaker 1: every single time, just guessing it and then drawing it
Speaker 1: out and knew exactly what it was. And he got
Speaker 1: so pissed about it, and he was like can can
Speaker 1: we can we get out of preschool, Like, can we
Speaker 1: stop with this nonsense? Just a fucking stud.
Speaker 4: So do so.
Speaker 1: A few days later, he came up with a new
Speaker 1: way to do remote viewing, which was by viewing map coordinates.
Speaker 1: Is what we were talking about in the previous episode.
Speaker 1: So targ uh So Russell targ and help put Off
Speaker 1: went out and bought the biggest at list that they
Speaker 1: could find at the local bookstore. Swan's coordinate map viewing
Speaker 1: map viewing turned out to be a big success. A
Speaker 1: critic at the CIA suggested that maybe he had memorized
Speaker 1: the entire global map. Okay, try that, dude, you're talking
Speaker 1: about coordinates, You remember the entire globe of coordinates. That
Speaker 1: would be crazy. But anyways, serious, that's just somebody working
Speaker 1: at the CIA. That's the only thing that he can
Speaker 1: think of to make sense of this, you know, some
Speaker 1: some naysayer. But anyhow, Swan went on to use randomly
Speaker 1: chosen numerical coordinates to view randomly selected events, people, and
Speaker 1: structures around the planet. He performed equally well using this
Speaker 1: coordinate based viewing system. So not only was he able
Speaker 1: to like tell you what was in the box he
Speaker 1: was he was able to you know, see five feet underground.
Speaker 1: He was able to view events, people and structures that
Speaker 1: were that he was able to see using only the grid.
Speaker 1: Like just like in putting numbers into his mind, in
Speaker 1: things pop up that makes no sense you know, logically anyway,
Speaker 1: but that's just the magic of the mind. So then
Speaker 1: you have validation of remote viewers, it says so Swan
Speaker 1: coined the term remote view to describe the process. Though
Speaker 1: you can question whether the information is remote to the
Speaker 1: viewer or whether the process is entirely visual. Some people
Speaker 1: are more sensitive to auditory, kinesthetic or other sensory types,
Speaker 1: and few viewers actually in quotes see the target very clearly. Nonetheless,
Speaker 1: the name stuck and was sufficient. It was sufficient to
Speaker 1: convince the intelligence agencies to fund the project. Other viewers
Speaker 1: were also asked also task to help targ and put
Speaker 1: off understand remote viewing. People like Pat Price, a former
Speaker 1: police commissioner from Burbank, California, also proved to be an
Speaker 1: excellent viewer. Price used his own system to view where
Speaker 1: he imagined that he was at the oh he imagined
Speaker 1: that he was at the distant target site. So there's
Speaker 1: many different ways you can go on about this kind
Speaker 1: of stuff, but imagine instead of say it's all like
Speaker 1: in the mind anyway. So it's about like what you're
Speaker 1: most comfortable with, How does it work the best in
Speaker 1: your mind? You had Ingo Swan and he was able
Speaker 1: to you know, he was seeing it in his mind
Speaker 1: and because he was an artist, he would draw it right.
Speaker 1: Then you got this Pat Price guy and he's like, look,
Speaker 1: it's not remote like I'm there, you know, Like he goes,
Speaker 1: I'm there in my mind, of course, you know. So
Speaker 1: there's just different ways of being able to kind of
Speaker 1: remote view here. And so yeah, he used his own systems. Yeah,
Speaker 1: his own system and it says his results were so
Speaker 1: good that the CIA hired him to work for them
Speaker 1: directly and then back east. Another natural viewer, Joe mcmonagall,
Speaker 1: also known as Remote Viewer Number one, worked directly with
Speaker 1: the US Army and the Defense Intelligence Agency. He also
Speaker 1: or He was also tested and found to have amazing
Speaker 1: abilities to describe and sketch distant locations. Upon retirement, mcmonagall
Speaker 1: was awarded a Legion of Merit award and in part
Speaker 1: for his five years remote viewing missions for the military
Speaker 1: and various govern agencies. So did it for five years
Speaker 1: for the CIA. I mean, if you're not coming up with,
Speaker 1: you know, proof that it actually works, CIA ain't going
Speaker 1: to keep you on their pay roll for five fucking years,
Speaker 1: you know, right. So beyond government you some remote viewers
Speaker 1: have claimed applications in areas such as crime solving, missing
Speaker 1: person searches, and even financial market predictions. It says, However,
Speaker 1: these claims remain anecdotal and lack independent verification because some people,
Speaker 1: you know, it's it's something that you got to work
Speaker 1: at and it's not always going to be right. How
Speaker 1: do you know that you tuned into the exact right
Speaker 1: location and da da da da da. So it's it's
Speaker 1: hard to verify it. But the cool thing is is
Speaker 1: what you can do is h I saw, dude, there
Speaker 1: was this one TV show and I can't remember, I
Speaker 1: think it was on Discovery or something like that, and
Speaker 1: they were teaching they were teaching these uh, these people
Speaker 1: how to remote view. And so it was two people, right,
Speaker 1: and there was the teacher and then these two other
Speaker 1: people that were trying to learn how to do it.
Speaker 1: So one person would go and just go anywhere in
Speaker 1: town to like just imagine anywhere and go there actually
Speaker 1: physically in town. I want you to stop somewhere and
Speaker 1: then finally get to your destination, right, And the other
Speaker 1: person was to sit there, not knowing where that person
Speaker 1: was going to go, and sit there in meditation and
Speaker 1: just like draw whatever comes to her mind. Right, she
Speaker 1: was able to do. She was able to remote view
Speaker 1: and prove that her friend that went on the little journey,
Speaker 1: she was able to prove that not only where she was,
Speaker 1: like the structure that she had eventually ended up stopping at,
Speaker 1: which which I think was like a cell phone tower
Speaker 1: or something like that, or a bridge or something, but
Speaker 1: she was also able to tell that she stopped off
Speaker 1: somewhere before that, and that the place that she stopped
Speaker 1: off at was to go get a Starbucks coffee. It's like,
Speaker 1: how does all that just instantly come to your mind?
Speaker 1: And what they'll say is is that there's a lot
Speaker 1: of like, uh, the people what is it called? Basically
Speaker 1: like first beginner's luck. That's all I was looking for. Like,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of beginner's luck because you don't know
Speaker 1: how to do it, so you don't have any expectations, right,
Speaker 1: and so you're kind of just going with the flow.
Speaker 1: And if it works, it works. If it doesn't, then
Speaker 1: I'm just not meant for it. That's kind of how
Speaker 1: people think. But yeah, they say the beginner's luck your
Speaker 1: first time trying it, usually you have pretty high odds.
Speaker 3: You know. I was watching this YouTube video earlier and
Speaker 3: this guy was getting questioned about like the results of yeah,
Speaker 3: of remote viewing, and he was like, sometimes the answers
Speaker 3: are just nowhere to be found, like it's wishy washy,
Speaker 3: none of it really makes sense. But then there's other
Speaker 3: times where everything will be like solid, dude, like it
Speaker 3: will fuck you up because it's so fucking freaky the
Speaker 3: shit that he can pull out of it. So it's
Speaker 3: just one or the other.
Speaker 1: Well, and it all depends that you think about it,
Speaker 1: like what state of mind are you in? Like, uh,
Speaker 1: are are your stress levels high today? Is there something
Speaker 1: that's on your mind? Are you sick? Is there anything
Speaker 1: that is to your detriment? Whenever it comes to trying
Speaker 1: to connect, you know, it could be any number of variables.
Speaker 1: But like if you're maybe you're having a really good day,
Speaker 1: you're having a good week, you decide to sit down
Speaker 1: into a meditation, you're able to empty your mind and
Speaker 1: just be the observer of your thoughts. And once you
Speaker 1: become that observer, you'll notice like, oh, that's not a
Speaker 1: part of the string of thoughts that I was already observing.
Speaker 1: That's something entirely random, and that's the information like you're
Speaker 1: that's the literally, the entire point of meditation is to
Speaker 1: become the observer of your thoughts, not to be the thinker,
Speaker 1: but to be the observer of the thing that is
Speaker 1: having the thoughts, which is which is a bit of
Speaker 1: a brain fuck if you really think about it, like
Speaker 1: to imagine like your mind is thinking without you, like
Speaker 1: that's what yes, yes, And so whenever you get there,
Speaker 1: it brings a lot of mental clarity because some people
Speaker 1: are torn apart by their own thoughts, right, Like, that's
Speaker 1: that's what causes depression, that's what causes anxiety, that's what
Speaker 1: causes like suicidal tendencies and all that stuff, because they
Speaker 1: think that their thoughts are them. But the the magical
Speaker 1: thing is is that whenever you go deep enough into
Speaker 1: a meditation, you realize that's not the truth. That your
Speaker 1: thoughts are going to continue regardless. And as sag Guru said,
Speaker 1: he goes, he goes. You know, so many people get
Speaker 1: all hung up on their thoughts. I want to make
Speaker 1: you know I want to have better thoughts and I
Speaker 1: want to stop having bad thoughts. And da da da,
Speaker 1: he goes, Do you ever like worry about if your
Speaker 1: liver is filtering exactly how it should be filtering? Do
Speaker 1: you ever worry if your heart is pumping exactly how
Speaker 1: it should be pumping? Do you ever worry if your
Speaker 1: lungs are doing lung things and pumping air in and out?
Speaker 1: He goes. All of those things are always happening. And
Speaker 1: the reason why you're so concerned about your brain and
Speaker 1: your mind and your thoughts is because that's the thing
Speaker 1: that you're aware of. You know, you're not aware of
Speaker 1: your heart pumping and your lungs going and your kidneys
Speaker 1: and your liver and all that stuff working. All that
Speaker 1: stuff's just doing what it does. And he goes the mind,
Speaker 1: You know, whenever you're having thoughts, that's just what the
Speaker 1: mind does. It's not even you, it's your mind. Thinking
Speaker 1: is no different than your heart pumping blood and all
Speaker 1: of these other things. Right, And so that's a good
Speaker 1: way to be able to separate it and be like, oh, okay,
Speaker 1: so my mind is just doing that. And for some reason,
Speaker 1: I've always associated that as me.
Speaker 3: You know, yeah, like your heart is involuntary movement or
Speaker 3: yeahluntary movement, but your brain, I feel like, is voluntary
Speaker 3: movement and involuntary movement depending on if you're just live
Speaker 3: in conscience or if you're actually producing effective thoughts.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, but you can also your your breathing
Speaker 1: could be voluntary or involuntary, very true, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean. And so that's the point is like if
Speaker 1: you ever like got really really baked right and or
Speaker 1: you really start tripping or whatever, and you're like, oh
Speaker 1: my god, I forgot to breathe, I forgot to breathe. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, and it's like, oh my god, I feel
Speaker 1: like I'm gonna die. I keep on forgetting to breathe,
Speaker 1: you know, like I hate whenever that happens. But you
Speaker 1: almost feel like if if you don't manually do the
Speaker 1: breathing that you're you know, your body is not going
Speaker 1: to just do it for you. And so that's really
Speaker 1: what it's like. Whenever we're like, oh I want you know,
Speaker 1: my brain and my thoughts and you know, all these
Speaker 1: thinkings and all this kind of stuff, it's like, dude,
Speaker 1: it can be involuntary too, you know. And that's the
Speaker 1: cool part about meditation is that you realize that most
Speaker 1: of your thinking is involuntary. Yeah, you know it comes
Speaker 1: to meditation, that's really what you want. Yeah, yeah, exactly.
Speaker 1: That's the magic of meditation.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: So all right, let's get back over to it, so
Speaker 1: coordinate remote viewing. All right, this is what I wanted
Speaker 1: to get to because this is I find this the
Speaker 1: most fascinating. I got coordinates on my arm bro of
Speaker 1: Lake Havasu, Lake Avasous City, Arizona. Right, That's where I
Speaker 1: was born. I love it there. It's my favorite place
Speaker 1: in the entire world. I see it every day. It's
Speaker 1: tattooed on my forearm. Right, I couldn't tell you the
Speaker 1: first digit of the first line. I couldn't tell you
Speaker 1: if on top is east and on bottom is north
Speaker 1: or south or I don't know that. So the fact
Speaker 1: that I have this tattooed on my arm and I
Speaker 1: see it literally every day, if you showed it to me,
Speaker 1: I would not be able to tell you that that's
Speaker 1: Lake Aviasu, right, But for some reason, it that's the
Speaker 1: thing you don't even need to know coordinates, but for
Speaker 1: some reason, whenever that information is inputed into your mind,
Speaker 1: thoughts will come that align with those coordinates. It's the
Speaker 1: craziest fucking shit, dude. It's magic or what we call magic.
Speaker 1: Uh So, however, it says Swan was able to describe
Speaker 1: with great precision what he was doing with his mind
Speaker 1: and attention as he was viewing, which was an ability
Speaker 1: other viewers didn't have. So this allowed him to come
Speaker 1: up with a six to say six six stage system
Speaker 1: that could be taught to anyone, including you or me.
Speaker 1: It became known as CRV, which is coordinate or controlled
Speaker 1: Remote Viewing. Swans CRV system is based on separating out
Speaker 1: signal from noise, based on separating out signal from noise
Speaker 1: in your mind as you are viewing. Okay, so you
Speaker 1: know all of those you know, stupid innocuous thoughts that
Speaker 1: we always have all the time. By putting in these numbers,
Speaker 1: he was able to allow himself not to focus on
Speaker 1: those bullshit thoughts that you're always having and just strictly
Speaker 1: focus on numbers and almost meditating on the numbers themselves,
Speaker 1: and allowing the numbers to be what you dive into.
Speaker 1: You're diving into the tiny little you know, the tiny
Speaker 1: little bits that make up numbers. It's like the wildest shit,
Speaker 1: and everybody's everybody has their own way, but this is
Speaker 1: the way that he found. So it says, all the
Speaker 1: information is recorded during a session, but the viewer puts
Speaker 1: the noise in a different place on the paper than
Speaker 1: the signal. At the end of the session, you can
Speaker 1: separate them from one another. The method became the basis
Speaker 1: of the remote viewing protocols that the US Army taught
Speaker 1: to several groups of remote viewers. The program continued until
Speaker 1: nineteen ninety five, at which point it was declassified by
Speaker 1: the government. So over two decades, approximately twenty million dollars
Speaker 1: of funding went to what eventually became known as the
Speaker 1: Stargate Project. Okay, that's what it was always called. It
Speaker 1: was always heavily classified. They eventually declassified it. Then you
Speaker 1: have the Princeton Oh yeah, you know what, We're gonna
Speaker 1: fucking do this a little bit. Actually, we're gonna try
Speaker 1: all of these things to try and see if we
Speaker 1: can have a little beginner's luck on this kind of stuff.
Speaker 1: This is amazing, Okay, So Princeton's random number Generator research okay.
Speaker 1: So during this time, it says the Princeton Engineering Anomalies
Speaker 1: Research Lab or pair at Princeton University, run by Bob
Speaker 1: John and Brenda Dunn, also conducted twenty years of research
Speaker 1: into remote viewing and so called micro psychokinesis. With experiments
Speaker 1: on the effect of human intention on random number generators,
Speaker 1: they found that, looking at the cumulative results of hundreds
Speaker 1: of thousands of trials, their subject could influence about two
Speaker 1: or three events per ten thousand random coin flips by
Speaker 1: seemingly moving the device away from true randomness in an
Speaker 1: inexplicable way. The odds of these results being by chance,
Speaker 1: we're an astonishing three hundred and seventy five trillion to one.
Speaker 1: The odds of it, the odds of that happening a
Speaker 1: three hundred and seventy five trillion to one. That's crazy.
Speaker 1: So basically, you have these random number generators. And actually
Speaker 1: I'll show you a random number generator online over here
Speaker 1: real quick. I think it's called random dot org. Yes, so,
Speaker 1: and this is what I usually use for, uh, determining
Speaker 1: the draft order in fantasy football. But anyway, so if
Speaker 1: you were to take so this is the random number
Speaker 1: generator and it has one to one hundred, but you
Speaker 1: know what we'll do. We'll just do one to ten. Basically,
Speaker 1: what it's saying is is what Princeton was doing is
Speaker 1: is that they would run this over about a thousand times, right,
Speaker 1: and at random, you should have ten percent. If you
Speaker 1: were to do it only one through ten, then that
Speaker 1: means after a thousand times, the average, the average amount
Speaker 1: of times that you would get a number one would
Speaker 1: be ten percent. The average times that you would get
Speaker 1: a number two would be ten percent. On average. It
Speaker 1: could fluctuate, maybe it's nine point nine or ten point
Speaker 1: one or something like that, but on average it's gonna
Speaker 1: come out to equal because it's entirely random. It's like
Speaker 1: a coin flip.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 1: However, what they found is is that whenever somebody has
Speaker 1: an intention to you know what, I want this to
Speaker 1: be number seven. I wanted to be a number seven
Speaker 1: so bad. I know it's going to be a number seven.
Speaker 1: Whenever you have that intention and you do it over
Speaker 1: the course of a thousand, one thousand times, that number
Speaker 1: seven is not gonna hit ten percent. It's gonna hit
Speaker 1: You're gonna see the number seven pop up fifteen percent
Speaker 1: of the time. Seventeen percent of the time. Nineteen percent
Speaker 1: of the time should be against all the odds. So
Speaker 1: why is it that whenever we set an intention, the
Speaker 1: computer notes wow, right, yeah, So because I said number seven,
Speaker 1: I have a ten percent chance of getting it.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 1: Let's just see if we get a seven. I need
Speaker 1: a seven. Wouldn't not have been some shit if it
Speaker 1: was a seven? We got a number ten? All right?
Speaker 1: So Cody, let's see. I want you to think of
Speaker 1: a number so hard, almost as if it's the only
Speaker 1: number that you know in all of existence, between the
Speaker 1: numbers one and ten. What number is that? Wm three
Speaker 1: three yep, all right, all right, as as I'm clicking it,
Speaker 1: I need you to be three three three three three, right,
Speaker 1: it's the only number I know, dude, only number you
Speaker 1: know is three. It's an eye all right. But anyway,
Speaker 1: the point of this, of this practice is is that
Speaker 1: over the course of a thousand times, depending on your
Speaker 1: level of intention, like how hard you're able to intend
Speaker 1: on it, I guess that it would affect it over
Speaker 1: the course of a thousand times greater than the chance
Speaker 1: of just random right, Very very interesting. Yeah, And and
Speaker 1: what's I mean, what's fascinating is is that you know,
Speaker 1: fucking Princeton. Dude, they spent twenty years researching this Princeton
Speaker 1: that's an Ivy League school, twenty years researching this okay
Speaker 1: shit and what they called it, micro psychokinesis wow. So
Speaker 1: random number generators. I love it. And that's think about it,
Speaker 1: bro it said. The odds of these results being by chance,
Speaker 1: we're an astonishing three hundred and seventy five trillion to one.
Speaker 1: It's the odds that that was happening. That's just nutty
Speaker 1: to me. It just goes to show, dude, our minds,
Speaker 1: whatever we are, is so much more powerful than we think. Like,
Speaker 1: we don't even know how to work this fucking machine yet,
Speaker 1: you know, right. So anyhow, let's move on. So the
Speaker 1: scientific analysis of the program. So, when the Stargate program
Speaker 1: was declassified, one of the two people asked to evaluate
Speaker 1: the program was statistician Jessica Uttz, the head of the
Speaker 1: American Statistical Association at the time of this writing. She concluded, so,
Speaker 1: she's American Statistical Association, So if anybody knows anything about stats,
Speaker 1: it would be the head of it, you know. Yeah,
Speaker 1: she concluded, using the standards applied to any other area
Speaker 1: of science. It is concluded that psychic functioning has been
Speaker 1: well established. Arguments that these results could be due to
Speaker 1: methodological flaws in the experiment are soundly refuted. Effects of
Speaker 1: similar magnitude to those found in government sponsored research at
Speaker 1: SRI and sai C, which is another government sponsored think tank,
Speaker 1: have been replicated at several laboratories across the world. Such
Speaker 1: consistency cannot be readily explained by claims of flaws or fraud.
Speaker 1: She's like, so she knows stats. If anybody in the
Speaker 1: world knows stats, it's the head of the stat head
Speaker 1: of the stat people.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: She's saying, there's no way they're faking this. There is
Speaker 1: something true about this that whenever you set out the intention,
Speaker 1: the attention, somehow it affects it. There's no way they're
Speaker 1: faking it. Numbers, just looking at the numbers, there's no way.
Speaker 1: Pretty cool, you know. So, Oh, and you know what,
Speaker 1: I actually reached out to this guy. We're eventually going
Speaker 1: to get him on the show. He's a fucking stud.
Speaker 1: He just went on the Joe Rogan Show like a
Speaker 1: couple of weeks ago. His name is Dean Rayden. This
Speaker 1: guy is amazing. I reached out to him before he
Speaker 1: went on Joe Rogan, and he was like, man, I'm
Speaker 1: so sorry, I have so many shows booked, you know,
Speaker 1: but I would love to try and do a show
Speaker 1: with you. And then two weeks later he's on with
Speaker 1: Joe Rogan. I'm like, he ain't got time for me, dude,
Speaker 1: He's going on fucking Rogan. But hey, hey, least reached back,
Speaker 1: so that was nice of him. But it says researcher
Speaker 1: Dean Rayden, doing very complex meta analysis using the results
Speaker 1: of many studies about psychic perception over many decades, came
Speaker 1: to the same conclusion. Looking at the entire population, not
Speaker 1: just trained remote viewers, remote viewing has a weak effect
Speaker 1: about four to eight percent higher than expected if we
Speaker 1: were only using our physical senses to gather information. Yet
Speaker 1: it's consistently there in everyone. So basically, remote viewing is
Speaker 1: gonna if you're just trying to be logical about it,
Speaker 1: you have a four to eight percent chance lower lower
Speaker 1: than you normally would if you're just trying to be
Speaker 1: logical with it. Basically, what he's saying is is that
Speaker 1: the remote viewers have a four to eight percent chance
Speaker 1: higher of guessing something guessing. I'll say with you know,
Speaker 1: Bunny years, it's crazy, you know, so it might be tiny,
Speaker 1: but that's across the entire population that's not trained remote viewers.
Speaker 1: That's that's simple. You know, regular people like you and me.
Speaker 1: If we had never trained in it, it would boost
Speaker 1: our ability to be able to get these things right
Speaker 1: by four to eight percent, which is pretty wild. Yeah,
Speaker 1: So coordinate remote viewing, so says Swan was able to
Speaker 1: describe with great person I already read that part. Why
Speaker 1: am I going backwards?
Speaker 5: So?
Speaker 1: How does remote viewing work? Here we go, So, when
Speaker 1: someone asked you to describe something, you normally proceed to
Speaker 1: name what you're perceiving using nouns and symbols. Remote viewing
Speaker 1: is just the opposite. You begin by describing your perceptions
Speaker 1: without trying to identify anything about what they mean or
Speaker 1: what the larger picture is. Start with the basic, just
Speaker 1: allt fundamental general components of the target site, such as
Speaker 1: whether it's man made, living or natural. You then proceed
Speaker 1: to basic colors, smells, temperatures, shapes, sizes. And this is
Speaker 1: exactly what Ryan Dabian was doing, you know, the Side
Speaker 1: Games winner. He goes, Look, you want to start very basic.
Speaker 1: Whenever he first started, he wasn't doing all the words
Speaker 1: and all of the shapes and all this other shit.
Speaker 1: He was just trying to remote view colors. Like he
Speaker 1: started out as if he was a baby learning what
Speaker 1: colors were right. It's like, I mean, that's really what
Speaker 1: it is. You're starting out essentially as a baby, and
Speaker 1: then you grow it over time. Do you think that
Speaker 1: you'd be able to do something like that over some time?
Speaker 3: I mean enough time for anything. You can. You can
Speaker 3: accomplish what you need to do, at least in a
Speaker 3: small area, you know, But so you can keep on
Speaker 3: working your way up, that's cool.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 3: The US government spent decades developing developing remote viewing in
Speaker 3: a structured learnable protocol rather than passive talent, you know,
Speaker 3: so we can continue to learn, I feel like, and
Speaker 3: be better.
Speaker 1: I mean, look, you got to start somewhere. I mean,
Speaker 1: you can't just go out onto a backs basketball court
Speaker 1: and expect to junk on check for the very first
Speaker 1: time you touch a basketball. It's like it has to
Speaker 1: be a repetitive kind of thing. Now you might get
Speaker 1: to be the best you could possibly ever be and
Speaker 1: still not dunk on check. It doesn't mean you suck.
Speaker 1: It just means some people just built different, you know
Speaker 1: what I'm saying. So anyhow, it says unlike clear mental pictures,
Speaker 1: the information usually surfaces as vague impressions, symbols, or sensory cues.
Speaker 1: Remote viewers often describe textures, colors, or feelings rather than
Speaker 1: images or full images, which makes the verification and feedback
Speaker 1: loop essential to interpret the data accurately. Only after you've
Speaker 1: been describing the target for a while can you proceed
Speaker 1: to more specific ideas and possibly names, names, nouns, and
Speaker 1: more analytical types of information, which I think is that's
Speaker 1: actually a really good point. Imagine you went on that
Speaker 1: show Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? Right, and you
Speaker 1: have to answer the million dollar question, but you're an idiot,
Speaker 1: and for some reason you just guessed your way all
Speaker 1: the way to a million right, all the way to
Speaker 1: the final question. But you have four slots open now,
Speaker 1: like you would want to be able to at that
Speaker 1: point what you're trying to do. Maybe you don't know
Speaker 1: the answer, but you're trying to like chop away some
Speaker 1: of the other answers. First, all right, I know it's
Speaker 1: not that I know it's not that. So I'm left
Speaker 1: with these two things. And that's basically what you're doing
Speaker 1: here in this remote viewing. You're not describing exactly what
Speaker 1: you're seeing. You're just like, let me reframe that. You're
Speaker 1: not trying to describe an entire object or an entire
Speaker 1: person or the exact scene or whatever. You're just allowing
Speaker 1: whatever information comes into you. So let's say you're in
Speaker 1: the middle of a jungle, or you're trying to review
Speaker 1: a location in the middle of the fucking jungle, right
Speaker 1: And let's just say it's the rainforest over there in
Speaker 1: Brazil and you're trying to remote view that, or somebody
Speaker 1: gives you coordinates and you're trying to figure out what
Speaker 1: comes to you. You might not sense monkeys and toucans
Speaker 1: and snakes and fucking you know, all the types of insects.
Speaker 1: You might not sense that at first, and you might
Speaker 1: not even sense the trees or the bushes or the
Speaker 1: birds that are flying or anything. What you might sense
Speaker 1: instead is a different sense. Maybe it starts to get
Speaker 1: a little bit more humid on your body, maybe it
Speaker 1: starts to get a little bit fucking hotter around you.
Speaker 1: For some reason, you don't know why. It just got
Speaker 1: hot out of nowhere for no reason. Right, you can
Speaker 1: use that as sensory data to then be able to
Speaker 1: interpret what exactly it is that you're seeing. So it's
Speaker 1: not just about what you're a man, or what you're
Speaker 1: seeing in your mind or the information that's flown through
Speaker 1: your mind. You might get chills if the coordinates are
Speaker 1: for Antarctica, you know, like you might you might sense
Speaker 1: maybe you smell pepperonis if the coordinates are to a
Speaker 1: pizza shop. Is something like that. And it's about using
Speaker 1: all of your instruments that you already have to perceive
Speaker 1: information that your eyes can't see, you know. And that's
Speaker 1: that's the fascinating part about it. So, so in this way,
Speaker 1: Swan would say that you are opening the aperture of
Speaker 1: your perception slowly and resisting the temptation to draw conclusions
Speaker 1: about what you're viewing. So, like you said, you're not
Speaker 1: trying to like, oh, I feel like that's New York City. No,
Speaker 1: don't do that, Like what else? What are you seeing?
Speaker 1: Are you seeing people walk on a sidewalk? Are you
Speaker 1: seeing a hot dog stand?
Speaker 3: You know?
Speaker 1: How do you know it's New York City? Maybe it's Nashville,
Speaker 1: maybe it's La maybe it's fucking Pittsburgh. Right, Yeah, Like,
Speaker 1: you don't try and be conclusive, just just describe on
Speaker 1: what exactly you're seeing. And that's what Swan would say
Speaker 1: if he was teaching you in Go Swan, if he
Speaker 1: was teaching you, he'd say, just focus on the little things.
Speaker 1: Whatever's coming, it says, follow the ambiguity methodology. So our
Speaker 1: minds are always attempting to conclude that attempting to conclude
Speaker 1: what we've perceived at any given moment. But because you
Speaker 1: have no conscious physical information to work from in remote viewing,
Speaker 1: you're almost always likely to be wrong if you do.
Speaker 3: So.
Speaker 1: This brings us to one of the great paradoxes of
Speaker 1: remote viewing. The fainter the perception. Listen to this, The
Speaker 1: fainter the perception, the more likely it is to be accurate,
Speaker 1: and less likely you are to feel confident in that perception.
Speaker 1: So basically, what he's saying is is that if you
Speaker 1: feel like you got the whole mental image, you're probably
Speaker 1: fucking wrong.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 1: But if it is hard, if it is hard to
Speaker 1: identify what it is you're perceiving, it is so faint
Speaker 1: that you are not confident in it at all, the
Speaker 1: more likely you are to be right. And that's because
Speaker 1: this information comes in a very very very subtle way.
Speaker 1: It is so subtle you almost like.
Speaker 3: You barely notice it kind of thing, you know, I
Speaker 3: mean a temperature, you know, a climate like those are
Speaker 3: little things when you're trying to look at a picture.
Speaker 1: Right exactly, Yeah, maybe you sense the fucking humidity or something, right, Yeah,
Speaker 1: So so to learn how to remote view. They Actually
Speaker 1: what's very fascinating is is that Joseph mcmonagall, which is
Speaker 1: remote viewer number one for the CIA, he is actually
Speaker 1: working at the Monroe Institute right now, and you can
Speaker 1: pay for It's like a I was looking this up earlier.
Speaker 1: If you they have a two and a half day program,
Speaker 1: it's an online program. It's kind of pricey, but you're
Speaker 1: working with the best of the best. And we don't
Speaker 1: have any affiliation with the Monroe Institute, although maybe one
Speaker 1: day we'll see. But if you were to sign up
Speaker 1: for that two and a half day program, you'd be
Speaker 1: working with mcmonagall, who is remote viewer number one. If
Speaker 1: you're ever gonna learn from anybody, it's this guy, right,
Speaker 1: And also a couple of other people that are working
Speaker 1: at the Monroe Institute. It's two and a half days long,
Speaker 1: and I saw it was like eight hundred bucks or
Speaker 1: nine hundred bucks or something like that. But I mean
Speaker 1: it sounds kind of pricey. But imagine after two and
Speaker 1: a half days, you're remote fucking viewing. Dude, Like you
Speaker 1: ever been curious if your girlfriend's cheating on you? You
Speaker 1: gotta be curious anymore? You can know now, you know.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm sure it's not that simple, but uh,
Speaker 1: I'm just joking about that, but it would be really
Speaker 1: cool to be able to develop this ability, right.
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 1: So it says if you would like to re explore
Speaker 1: remote viewing, there are many resources available. Books by participants
Speaker 1: in the original programs such as mcmonagall, Lynd Buchanan, Paul Smith,
Speaker 1: Ango Swan Dale Graff, and researchers like Russell targ or
Speaker 1: ed mayde or ed May Rather offer first hand accounts
Speaker 1: and training methods. Others including Dean Raidan, Courtney Brown, and
Speaker 1: Angela Thompson Smith continued studying the subject after the government
Speaker 1: program was declassified, and it goes on about you know, uh,
Speaker 1: other locations where you can find it and stuff like that. So, yeah,
Speaker 1: I wanted to look this guy up, this Akio Marita.
Speaker 1: I was like, damn, I knew all the other names,
Speaker 1: but I didn't know this guy was fucking founder of Sony.
Speaker 1: Was was learning how to remote view and supposedly he
Speaker 1: attributes that to his success on building Sony. It's crazy,
Speaker 1: this guy brought us the fucking PlayStation. Dude. Yeah you know, okay, so,
Speaker 1: uh you wanted to bring up the double blind. What
Speaker 1: were you saying about that?
Speaker 3: Yeah, dude, I just find it really interesting.
Speaker 1: What were they doing with that?
Speaker 3: Oh?
Speaker 4: With that?
Speaker 3: So what that means is like the viewer is given
Speaker 3: only a random set of numbers or coordinates link to
Speaker 3: a target, and neither the viewer nor the person guiding
Speaker 3: them to that area or the monitor knows what the
Speaker 3: target is, preventing subconscious leading.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah yeah, interesting, is like, yeah, it's the real deal. Then, yeah,
Speaker 1: that makes sense because it's not that you're receiving this
Speaker 1: information from somebody else's mind, which exactly you know, That's
Speaker 1: that's what a lot of people have said. I mean,
Speaker 1: that is one way of doing it that somebody could
Speaker 1: intentionally And we're going to get to a video on that,
Speaker 1: which is crazy, but you could, like, for example, if
Speaker 1: I wanted you to think a certain thought, if I
Speaker 1: was really good at this kind of stuff, I could
Speaker 1: send you a thought without you even noticing that I
Speaker 1: send it to you. But you're just gonna start thinking
Speaker 1: it randomly out of nowhere, right, Like, there are some
Speaker 1: some people that are so developed and so practiced and
Speaker 1: amazing at this that they can just send you information.
Speaker 1: And so these are typically the people who would be
Speaker 1: training you, Like if they're trying to train you on
Speaker 1: how to remote view, they're going to give you the
Speaker 1: coordinates or they're gonna, you know, give you whatever you
Speaker 1: need in order to practice it, but they're going to
Speaker 1: try and like make it a little easier by almost
Speaker 1: sending you some of the information telepathically. Man, Yeah, dude,
Speaker 1: it's wild.
Speaker 3: But could you imagine if you could just like tell
Speaker 3: me go get pizza, and like, I'm on my way
Speaker 3: to go get pizza as soon as you send that
Speaker 3: to me, like to just could you imagine the manipulation
Speaker 3: with something like that. That's pretty powerful of a tool.
Speaker 1: It's not necessarily manipulation because you have like it's all
Speaker 1: boils down to, like do you accept that thought or not.
Speaker 1: I could send you thoughts of like I need Papa John's.
Speaker 1: I need Papa John's, I need Papa John's. Get make
Speaker 1: it double pepperoni, extra cheese, right, make sure you get
Speaker 1: to make sure you grab like five garlic cubs. Like
Speaker 1: I could send you all of that, but maybe you're
Speaker 1: not hungry for pizza. Maybe you're not hungry for Papa John's.
Speaker 1: But it just it seemed like a random thought. I'm
Speaker 1: not hungry for Papa John's. I'm not even gonna say it, right,
Speaker 1: So it's all up to you know whether you're going
Speaker 1: to be accepting up the information anyway. But I get
Speaker 1: it if I catch you where maybe it's been a
Speaker 1: couple of weeks since you had a slice, and then
Speaker 1: I send you that thought of that greasy, cheesy, saucy,
Speaker 1: delicious pizza from Papa John's. And also I'm gonna need
Speaker 1: a mac and cheese bowl, you know what I mean.
Speaker 1: Like I can send you these kind of things and
Speaker 1: your mouth will start water and be like, you know what,
Speaker 1: pizza does sound really good? And I don't know why
Speaker 1: I even thought about this mac and cheese bowl sounds great.
Speaker 1: I never even get that but some reason just popped
Speaker 1: in my mind. Right, It's like these things have been
Speaker 1: proven to be real, but it's up. You know, you
Speaker 1: got to train up in it and stuff.
Speaker 3: Can you do that from like two different areas, Like
Speaker 3: say I'm in the drive through at Little Caesars, you know,
Speaker 3: and then could you send me a link basically to
Speaker 3: my brain that says, Oh, he's probably gonna want some
Speaker 3: garlic cups? You know what I mean. Because I've been
Speaker 3: in situations like that, I feel like.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm sure, and here's the proof of that. And
Speaker 1: I'm sure you've experienced it at some point in your
Speaker 1: life to where you think about somebody out of nowhere,
Speaker 1: out of the blue, for no reason, you think about them,
Speaker 1: and then they text you, or then they call you,
Speaker 1: then they send you a message on Instagram, or maybe
Speaker 1: you see their name pop up on a screen that
Speaker 1: you're like, what I was just thinking that? Like, how
Speaker 1: am I seeing that right now? Right? Yes, this happens
Speaker 1: all the time, and I think that we're all subconsciously
Speaker 1: doing it all the time, and that, like to bring
Speaker 1: up my boy lord Byron jestered, we're all magicians, bro,
Speaker 1: and we're we're always either blessing or we're always cursing
Speaker 1: ourselves and there's no in between. And so literally your
Speaker 1: thoughts mirror your reality. And so if that's the case,
Speaker 1: and we live in some kind of simulation or some
Speaker 1: kind of matrix, or we live in some kind of
Speaker 1: dream or what have you, it's like, of course that
Speaker 1: information is gonna flow back and forth, because the idea
Speaker 1: is that you know, atoms, all right, I'm gonna go
Speaker 1: all the way back. Atoms never touch all we Everything
Speaker 1: physical is made of atoms, made of atoms and quarks,
Speaker 1: and I think the quark is even the smaller version
Speaker 1: of an atom, right, But everything is made of atoms.
Speaker 1: And whenever you zoom all the way in on a
Speaker 1: microscope and you're trying to find an atom and to
Speaker 1: see how all these molecules and all these atoms are
Speaker 1: all connected, nothing is connected. Nothing like what we are.
Speaker 1: We we're truly not what we think we are. So
Speaker 1: all of the atoms that make up cody, none of
Speaker 1: those atoms are touching like there's And that is how
Speaker 1: certain people like like that book I was telling you
Speaker 1: about the megas of Hava, how he's able to shove
Speaker 1: a you know, a chopstick through a TUBEAI four is
Speaker 1: because he knows that, and he's manipulating the atoms, shoving
Speaker 1: it all the way through without splintering anything, right, And
Speaker 1: that's because he broke free of the illusion that there
Speaker 1: is physical reality. And so whenever you can break three,
Speaker 1: break free of the illusion that there is physical reality
Speaker 1: and all you see are just tiny bits of information.
Speaker 1: That's all everything is, is just bits of information, then
Speaker 1: of course I can fucking send you something. You can
Speaker 1: send me something because the actual secret is is that, yes,
Speaker 1: none of the atoms are actually touching, but everything is
Speaker 1: one thing. So there is no time, there is no distance,
Speaker 1: there's no true distance to anything. Like you're in Arizona
Speaker 1: right now, I'm in Louisiana, but in reality we're in
Speaker 1: the same exact place. We just think we're in different locations.
Speaker 1: So how I'm able to send you my information, how
Speaker 1: you're able to send me information? It's it's because you've
Speaker 1: broken through the illusion of what reality actually is. You
Speaker 1: know that that's deep like location is a is a
Speaker 1: fucking falsity that the only thing that exists not only
Speaker 1: is a distance and illusion, but time is as well. Right,
Speaker 1: Like if you really break it down. There is like
Speaker 1: in all of reality, there is no such thing as yesterday.
Speaker 1: There's no such thing as tomorrow. You've never lived in tomorrow.
Speaker 1: Like you can think about tomorrow, and you can think
Speaker 1: about yesterday, but you've never lived in yesterday. You've only
Speaker 1: ever lived right now. Okay, you know what I'm saying. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so you have memory of yesterday, But even yesterday was
Speaker 1: right now too, because there's never been a yesterday, and
Speaker 1: there's never a tomorrow. There's only ever right now. I
Speaker 1: almost feel like, I mean, it's enough to turn your
Speaker 1: brain into massed potatoes. Point is is that this reality
Speaker 1: is not what we think it is. It's a lot
Speaker 1: more fluid, and there is no there's no separation from anything. No,
Speaker 1: there's no tomorrow, next year, ten years from now, five
Speaker 1: years ago, ten years ago. None of that exists. The
Speaker 1: true nature of all reality is that everything is right here,
Speaker 1: right now. So whenever you're trying to transfer information to
Speaker 1: somebody else, as long as your intention is strong enough,
Speaker 1: you should be able to send at least a thought.
Speaker 1: And what you know what proves this? If you want
Speaker 1: to get really weird, what you ever heard of sex? Magic?
Speaker 3: Now?
Speaker 1: So magic of all sorts, but this is like I've
Speaker 1: tried it and it's it's tried and true. Brother, Okay,
Speaker 1: x magic is a real thing, So I'll tell you
Speaker 1: how it works. And this is actually what they say
Speaker 1: that a lot of the billionaires and millionaires use it
Speaker 1: as well. So whether you're you know, doing it with
Speaker 1: somebody or maybe you're doing it with yourself, however you
Speaker 1: get down, no matter how you get down, right, it's
Speaker 1: the most important part is as soon as you're getting
Speaker 1: ready to orgasm, you think about whatever it is you're
Speaker 1: trying to manifest. That is literally your creative power in
Speaker 1: that moment. Just imagine like in that moment, in that moment,
Speaker 1: something is being created, right and your that is a
Speaker 1: burst of your own internal energy that is essentially your
Speaker 1: chi coming into fucking manifest form, right Like if it
Speaker 1: wasn't for if it wasn't for call it your don't
Speaker 1: your fucking sploge or whatever, like, there would never be
Speaker 1: and that women can do this too, but there could
Speaker 1: never be creation. So literally, they are creative powers that
Speaker 1: are coming out of you whenever your orgasm. Okay, and
Speaker 1: in that moment, if you were to think about whatever
Speaker 1: it is you're trying to manifest. Maybe you're trying to manifest.
Speaker 1: Oh man, I really wish this girl would actually give
Speaker 1: me a chance, or I really wish this god that
Speaker 1: this job would call me for an interview, or you know,
Speaker 1: I really wish this person would stop being a dick
Speaker 1: and we could actually get along or whatever. It could
Speaker 1: be anything like that if you And it seems kind
Speaker 1: of intuitive because why would you want to think about
Speaker 1: that as you're orgasming? Right, But like that's the secret
Speaker 1: because nobody thinks about it, you're able to do it,
Speaker 1: and that's how you manifest. I've done it. I've done it.
Speaker 1: It's a real thing. Yeah, how does that work? How
Speaker 1: how is that possibles?
Speaker 3: Me?
Speaker 1: It's because I set forth the intention and that message
Speaker 1: was transferred. I mean, I guess the message had had
Speaker 1: some rocket boosters on the back of it with an orgasm.
Speaker 5: You know.
Speaker 1: But either way, it's the same thing. It's really the
Speaker 1: same thing. It's all about your intention. And to be honest,
Speaker 1: this is all ritual is as well. Like if you
Speaker 1: were to do a ritual and eventually we're gonna do
Speaker 1: a show on rituals. Me and shown used to do
Speaker 1: them all the time. Dude, Like, we did a money
Speaker 1: ritual one time, a money ritual show, and I did
Speaker 1: a money ritual one night. The next day I made
Speaker 1: the most amount of money I ever made in one day. Now,
Speaker 1: you're not calling upon you're not calling upon gods and
Speaker 1: devils and all this other bullshit. Like it's setting men forth. Yes,
Speaker 1: it's setting forth an intention and allowing it to happen.
Speaker 1: You know, it's a trip. It's a trip how it works.
Speaker 1: So anyhow, I wanted to pull this up over here.
Speaker 1: This is Themonroeinstitute dot org. Anybody can go check it out. Dude.
Speaker 1: I literally see it as like it's America's Hogwarts? Is
Speaker 1: really what's going on here? I think it's over in Virginia. Yeah,
Speaker 1: So if you were to sign up for that program
Speaker 1: with mcmonagall over at the remote or over at the
Speaker 1: Monroe Institute, eight hundred and thirty nine bucks, which is
Speaker 1: a little pricey, even for me. It's a little pricey.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 1: I don't know if I could ever imagine spending that
Speaker 1: kind of money on that, But I mean, hey, I
Speaker 1: spend a lot of money on learning how to hypnotize people.
Speaker 1: So remote viewing whatever, no big deal. So I think
Speaker 1: it'd be interesting.
Speaker 3: Actually, I feel like you can apply that to a
Speaker 3: lot of different styles and spiritual ways and lifestyles and
Speaker 3: stuff like that.
Speaker 1: Oh, dude, if you can master this, there's there's not
Speaker 1: a whole lot you wouldn't be able to master.
Speaker 3: Dude, can manifest like anything if you can master this.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean you're you're you're allowing bits of information
Speaker 1: to be perceived by your higher self in order to
Speaker 1: garner a message about what's going on in a distant location.
Speaker 1: Like you're a wizard if you can do this, legit.
Speaker 1: So this is actually Joe mcmonagall. He's talking about it.
Speaker 1: He works over at the Monroe Institute, as I said,
Speaker 1: and he talks. It's a little four minute video, but
Speaker 1: if you hear about how he talks about it and
Speaker 1: how he does and how he trains people, it's sometimes
Speaker 1: it's a little bit easier to click to learn from
Speaker 1: the masters.
Speaker 3: The Witch, from the Wizard of Oz that would have
Speaker 3: had that ball or whatever, and so Crystal, yes, Dorothy
Speaker 3: and how she's falling asleep or whatever. Just to have
Speaker 3: those powers would be super cool.
Speaker 1: Well, and that's something that's actually real too. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's not real in the sense like how you think
Speaker 1: it is, but it's real in a different way. It's
Speaker 1: called scrying, and we can go, dude, We're gonna go
Speaker 1: over all this kind of shit because I feel like
Speaker 1: I learned about all this stuff years ago whenever I
Speaker 1: first started this show, and I got to fill you
Speaker 1: in so that we can we can see eye to
Speaker 1: eye and see how see like how all this stuff works.
Speaker 1: But basically, scrying is you take like an obsidian mirror.
Speaker 1: You know what citian is. It's like the it's like
Speaker 1: the black crystal. It's made from like lava, right, and
Speaker 1: so obsidian. It's like a you can have it as
Speaker 1: like a mirrored plate or a crystal ball or something
Speaker 1: like that. And the point is not necessarily to see
Speaker 1: an image in the crystal ball. It's to stare at
Speaker 1: the crystal ball enough to where you go into a
Speaker 1: trance state. And by going into a trance state, you're
Speaker 1: able to, like things around you start to become a
Speaker 1: little bit distorted. It's almost like if you open your eyes,
Speaker 1: it's almost like the same perception that you have whenever
Speaker 1: you're looking out of your peripherals is everywhere now right.
Speaker 1: Whenever you're in a trance, so like a meditative trance
Speaker 1: or a hypnotic trance or what have you. That's what
Speaker 1: happens whenever you're scrying, and they say that, And actually,
Speaker 1: if you want to really heighten it, you go into
Speaker 1: a trance first while you're listening to meditation music. However
Speaker 1: you want to do it, maybe you lay a little
Speaker 1: incense in the background because you're really trying to fan
Speaker 1: the flames of this meditation. You're trying to really get
Speaker 1: in that zone. And smell does smell will help you
Speaker 1: get into a meditative state, if that's what you associate
Speaker 1: with meditation, right, But also if you have a flame,
Speaker 1: if you have like a candle flame whatever, right next
Speaker 1: to the scrying mirror or the scrying crystal ball, it's
Speaker 1: said to enhance whatever's going on with that, which is
Speaker 1: pretty damn magical. Sorry, I got a little discombobulated because
Speaker 1: Cody was having some technical malfunctions, but we got to
Speaker 1: figure it out. And this is Joe mcmonagall talking just
Speaker 1: for about four minutes, very very interesting how he describes it.
Speaker 1: Let's see what he has to say.
Speaker 2: The course at the Monroe Institute is unique. It's different
Speaker 2: from any other course you're going to get anywhere else.
Speaker 2: The primary reason that it was developed at the Institute
Speaker 2: had to do with my being brought here by the
Speaker 2: US Army put in communication with Bob Monroe. I've been
Speaker 2: having lots of experiences since my second year death experience.
Speaker 2: In my first near death experience, I was able to
Speaker 2: use here.
Speaker 1: I didn't even know that he had NDEs. But that's
Speaker 1: typically what people say, is that whenever you have an
Speaker 1: nd or anything like life altering like that, it almost
Speaker 1: reminds you that you're capable of doing this kind of stuff.
Speaker 1: It's a reset, literally on how you look at reality.
Speaker 1: So let's continue.
Speaker 2: Civic sound qualities in the sound that the Institute provides,
Speaker 2: or emptying my mind, calming my mind, centering my mind,
Speaker 2: things like that which assist in producing the remote viewing information.
Speaker 2: There's a misconception about remote viewing that many people don't
Speaker 2: understand is remote viewing is not about discovering what the
Speaker 2: object or the event or the information is that they're
Speaker 2: being targeted on. It's not about knowing everything you can
Speaker 2: know about the target or being able to say this
Speaker 2: is what it is. Remote viewing is about producing bits
Speaker 2: of information that come to the mind that are not
Speaker 2: that are unexpected. They just appear in the mind. The
Speaker 2: person is able to put them down and in the
Speaker 2: in the analysis they are found to be of some
Speaker 2: value in their connection to the target. It's not about
Speaker 2: making someone a remote viewer. It's about providing them with
Speaker 2: a facility or a place that they can sit in
Speaker 2: being enveloped in the conditions that allow them to produce
Speaker 2: accurate information in the remote viewing technique, whatever that might be.
Speaker 2: Just about anybody could be an excellent remote viewer. It
Speaker 2: depends on how open their mind is or how open
Speaker 2: they can be, and it also has to do with
Speaker 2: how much they're willing to spend a great deal of
Speaker 2: time doing practice or what their investment might be in
Speaker 2: terms of trying to learn to control what's going on
Speaker 2: up here. That's why the Mono Institute has been such
Speaker 2: a good help in terms of developing remote viewing to
Speaker 2: the degree it can be developed as we teach a
Speaker 2: lot of things that contribute to the discipline of the mind,
Speaker 2: and that's critical. We've found that there is no other
Speaker 2: adjunct that's usable for improving remote viewing without that without
Speaker 2: that discipline, that mental discipline in the institute. It's very
Speaker 2: good at providing that techniques don't matter. It's up to
Speaker 2: the individual and what they're what their skills demand of them,
Speaker 2: or how they've fallen into the skill itself. There's only
Speaker 2: one protocol for remote viewing. Remote viewing has to be
Speaker 2: taught double blind, which means that no matter what the
Speaker 2: person does, they can't know anything about what the target
Speaker 2: is when they're working on the remote viewing that's for
Speaker 2: practice or anything else. Double blind infers that anybody in
Speaker 2: the room with the remote viewer at the time they're
Speaker 2: doing remote viewing practice or otherwise, no one can know
Speaker 2: what the target is. Because we now know that human
Speaker 2: beings communicate between one another in a multitude of ways,
Speaker 2: to include nonverbal communications in LP and all kinds of
Speaker 2: other problems that can violate the protocol. So as long
Speaker 2: as the person is double blind, they can use pretty
Speaker 2: much any technique they want to use. In all my
Speaker 2: years of teaching remote viewing, there's no specific occurrence, there's
Speaker 2: no event that dictates that, oh, now this person's a
Speaker 2: remote viewer. In fact, no matter how long you're a
Speaker 2: remote viewer, it can be for one year or fifty years,
Speaker 2: you're going to have as many failures as you're going
Speaker 2: to have successes. Remote viewing has to do, like I said,
Speaker 2: with everything coming together at the same time. Everything has
Speaker 2: a focus on producing information. Everything has to happen a
Speaker 2: certain way in order for that information to be produced
Speaker 2: and for that information to be accurate.
Speaker 1: Okay, So learning from the legend himself, Joseph mcmonagall, I
Speaker 1: thought that that would have been invaluable information for anybody
Speaker 1: that is interested in learning how to do it. And
Speaker 1: obviously he's an advocate for the Monroe Institute because that's
Speaker 1: where he works. But anybody that's ever looked into the
Speaker 1: Monroe Institute, you know that is straight up magical. And
Speaker 1: we will be going there one day, Cody, mark my words,
Speaker 1: Me and Sean had aspirations of going there one day,
Speaker 1: but now me and you do.
Speaker 3: That's just how it's gonna be super interesting. Bro.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, it's so cool. So where are we going
Speaker 1: to go next? Oh yeah, here's mcmonaga again talking about it,
Speaker 1: and I thought that this would be a pretty good
Speaker 1: place to start as well. Let's see what he has
Speaker 1: to say here. This is him on the Sean Ryan Show.
Speaker 1: Anybody that's ever watched that podcast and let's see what
Speaker 1: he has to say. This is just a YouTube short.
Speaker 2: I think where the mistakes mate is in the term
Speaker 2: remote viewing that imple I seeing it. You kind of
Speaker 2: aren't seeing it, but you are what it is. It's
Speaker 2: a compilation of all of your senses. Mongst. People go
Speaker 2: into remote viewing thinking I'm going to see something, and
Speaker 2: so they're totally incompletely dependent on their eyes. It's not
Speaker 2: just your vision. Where they make a mistakes. They make
Speaker 2: a mistake in naming things or having the need to
Speaker 2: say what it is. Nobody wants to know what it is.
Speaker 2: They want just scryptors of it. How did the spy
Speaker 2: from South Africa and encryptis messages? And they put it
Speaker 2: a double wrap yup pak envelope and they put a
Speaker 2: on it. And I go in a room and they
Speaker 2: throw the end what with a on it on a
Speaker 2: table and they say, tell us about a something else
Speaker 2: gets you to the target what we think it is?
Speaker 2: And I wrote a paper on this thirty five years ago.
Speaker 2: It's intention, attention to detail about the target and expectation
Speaker 2: for outcome. I think we're the mistake, dude.
Speaker 1: See it's see what I'm saying like, it's simple, but
Speaker 1: it ain't easy. It's just these little tactics of trying
Speaker 1: to get you there. And this is actually the paper
Speaker 1: that he wrote. I wanted to bring it up. This
Speaker 1: is what he was talking about about how to have
Speaker 1: the intention, attention and XP was it expectation the third thing.
Speaker 1: And this is his paper he wrote. It's actually not
Speaker 1: very long, only like eight pages long or something like that.
Speaker 1: We're not going to read the whole thing, but I
Speaker 1: do want to read a little bit of the abstract
Speaker 1: and a little bit of the intro, just so we
Speaker 1: can kind of get a basic idea. But it says Joseph.
Speaker 1: Joseph W mcmonagall has participated in forty four on camera
Speaker 1: demonstrations of remote viewing, thirty and thirty five of which
Speaker 1: would be considered as successful. So you went on camera
Speaker 1: forty four times in thirty five of the times. He
Speaker 1: was writing, so even the best of the best aren't
Speaker 1: going to get it right every time. And that's what
Speaker 1: he was saying too. He was like, look, you're it's
Speaker 1: it's essentially a crapshoot whenever you boil it down to statistics.
Speaker 1: But just the fact that you're able to guess it
Speaker 1: even half the time is crazy.
Speaker 3: Yeah, right day or fiftieth year, you're gonna have just
Speaker 3: as many failures as accomplishment.
Speaker 1: I mean, dude, those could be literally, it doesn't even
Speaker 1: have to be coordinates to Earth. It could be coordinates
Speaker 1: to fucking space or to another planet or something like that.
Speaker 1: So the fact that you can get even half of
Speaker 1: them right is slimton like. It doesn't make any sense,
Speaker 1: but it says that is Uh would be considered as successful.
Speaker 1: That is, if he had been assessed by the usual
Speaker 1: blind rank order method, they would have easily been ranked
Speaker 1: correctly in the first place. The question we address here
Speaker 1: is what, if anything, is special about these cases? Under
Speaker 1: US government funding, the research track record of what is
Speaker 1: known as stargate was exceptional. Perhaps the success could be
Speaker 1: attributed to the near exclusive use of highly talented special participants. However,
Speaker 1: we speculate that the ill defined concepts of intention, attention,
Speaker 1: and expectation were and are major contributors to the success
Speaker 1: of application oriented, laboratory and media centered trials. As a
Speaker 1: demonstration or I'm sorry, as an illustration of these points,
Speaker 1: we provide a detailed description of the protocols and results
Speaker 1: of a recent demonstration trial conducted for the National Geographic
Speaker 1: Channel that was carried out in lfr's Remote Viewing Laboratory
Speaker 1: in Palo Alto, California. The produces, produces, the producers and
Speaker 1: staff of Pioneer Productions dedicated one individual for four days
Speaker 1: just to prepare for the shoot. Her days. Her duties
Speaker 1: were to learn about what constitute a what constitutes a
Speaker 1: good remote viewing target, identify six targets within twenty five
Speaker 1: kilometers from the laboratory, prepared two sets of target packs,
Speaker 1: identify a neutral third party individual to secure these materials,
Speaker 1: and act as beacon person a beacon person during the trial.
Speaker 1: The full team included a camera crew of three and
Speaker 1: a single producer. At the time of the trial, all
Speaker 1: people present with the viewer. All people present. Sorry, this
Speaker 1: print is super tiny. People present, damn it? What am
Speaker 1: I doing here?
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 1: All right? All people present with the viewer were blind
Speaker 1: not only to the individual randomly selected target, but also
Speaker 1: to the complete six fold target pack. The response was blind,
Speaker 1: rank order assessed on camera, and the target was matched
Speaker 1: as first place. The qualitative correspondence with the intended site
Speaker 1: was excellent and typical of the thirty four of forty
Speaker 1: four other media trials provided by mcmonagall. The trial or
Speaker 1: the single trial serves as an exemplar of an identical
Speaker 1: applicate or an ideal application of intention, attention, and expectation. Sorry,
Speaker 1: I was bouncing all over That print is so damn tiny.
Speaker 1: I should have just zoomed in on it. There we go.
Speaker 1: So that's essentially the abstract. And so they're doing everything
Speaker 1: they possibly can to prove that there's no telepathic information
Speaker 1: being sent from one person to another. We're going to
Speaker 1: have these people here, these people, these people there, and
Speaker 1: none of them know shit about fuck right, And so
Speaker 1: that way we're going to prove without a shadow of
Speaker 1: a doubt that whatever is being picked up is not
Speaker 1: by another person but by the information at a distant
Speaker 1: location altogether. And that's what they were trying to do.
Speaker 1: They weren't trying to prove telepathy that's already been proved, right,
Speaker 1: They're trying to prove remote viewing. So they went through
Speaker 1: every single method they could think of, and you know,
Speaker 1: they found that the blind rank order method was the
Speaker 1: best way to prove it, and by using that method,
Speaker 1: they got thirty five out of forty four, right, which
Speaker 1: is crazy, all right, And so the introduction goes. It says,
Speaker 1: we provide a qualitative and first hand account from part
Speaker 1: of a research team that has worked together for twenty
Speaker 1: five years. We will focus upon remote viewing trials that
Speaker 1: were conducted under the glare of various television cameras. The
Speaker 1: first of these was conducted by LMNO Productions in California.
Speaker 1: They approached us to be on a segment for a
Speaker 1: US national show called Put to the Test, which aired
Speaker 1: on the ABC network in November of ninety five. Since
Speaker 1: that time, mcmoniga has participated in forty three additional real
Speaker 1: time on camera remote viewing demonstrations with national, live, national
Speaker 1: level television production companies in six countries. It says about
Speaker 1: thirty five of these were such qualitative agreement. Were of
Speaker 1: such qualitative agreement with the intended site that if they
Speaker 1: had been analyzed by the usual blind ranking me blind
Speaker 1: ranking technique commonly used with the laboratory, they would have
Speaker 1: easily been matched as first place, which is kind of
Speaker 1: just going over what we're talking about right here, But
Speaker 1: it is interesting that they were able to statistically almost
Speaker 1: be perfect.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 1: I do have another video that I wanted to show.
Speaker 1: And by the way, this is a little secret out
Speaker 1: there that I just learned. I don't know how, I'm
Speaker 1: just coming up on it. But if you are tired
Speaker 1: of watching YouTube ads, there's a little secret that you
Speaker 1: can do to bypass those ads to where those ads
Speaker 1: never come up, and that is if you go to
Speaker 1: Duck Duck Go. I think the Brave browser has this
Speaker 1: as well. But if you go to Duck Duck Go,
Speaker 1: where we have no affiliation with them whatsoever. I'm just,
Speaker 1: you know, kind of giving away secrets over here. Not
Speaker 1: that they're secrets. I just didn't know about it. If
Speaker 1: you go over to Duck Duck Go, they have this
Speaker 1: duck Player that is embedded within the website, and if
Speaker 1: you watch the video on what is called the duck Player,
Speaker 1: you'll be able to watch any video, no matter how
Speaker 1: long or how short, completely commercial free. It blocks all
Speaker 1: the commercials and all the ads. I'm like, how have
Speaker 1: I gone my life without knowing something like this?
Speaker 3: Dude, I didn't know that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, So for anybody that likes to watch the show
Speaker 1: on YouTube, there's a little secret sauce, a little secret
Speaker 1: sauce that you you just watch the show on Duck
Speaker 1: duck go, and you ain't got to worry about commercials,
Speaker 1: all right, But this is an interesting one. This is actually,
Speaker 1: this is what I was referring to earlier. This is
Speaker 1: Russell Tark. This is another one of the people that
Speaker 1: were in the remote viewing program back in the seventies
Speaker 1: with the Stanford Research Institute and the CIA that was
Speaker 1: actually training people within the military to learn how to
Speaker 1: remote view Russell targ was one of those main trainers.
Speaker 1: And so it says he's the co founder of remote viewing. Okay,
Speaker 1: let's see what he has to say. He gives a
Speaker 1: little demonstration and we're going to watch that here.
Speaker 5: One of the most paranormal things about our program is
Speaker 5: that we had continuous support from a particular group of
Speaker 5: agencies NASA, the Army, and the Air Force for twenty
Speaker 5: years to do this group of experiments. And that itself
Speaker 5: is paranormal.
Speaker 4: So let's go into how easy you say it is
Speaker 4: to do actual remote viewing, because I think a lot
Speaker 4: of people don't have to spend thousands of thousand take
Speaker 4: a week course.
Speaker 5: To do this all right now, I don't know if
Speaker 5: you can do all this and hold the microphone I
Speaker 5: could do it.
Speaker 2: You can do it.
Speaker 3: Go ahead.
Speaker 5: What do you mean you draw with your right hand?
Speaker 5: I do draw with my right hand, okay, and give
Speaker 5: you a pen okay. And the way this works is
Speaker 5: that I have an object that I've brought here for you.
Speaker 5: If you've never seen it, say interesting and usual object
Speaker 5: that I have in my pocket. What you want to
Speaker 5: do is close your eyes and describe the fragmentary pictures
Speaker 5: that come to you. What surprising thing pops into mind.
Speaker 5: Usually the first impressions are golden. It's as though you've
Speaker 5: reached out and you've just dipped into the psychic signal.
Speaker 5: It doesn't make any sense, right, always makes me happy
Speaker 5: when a person says, I'm looking at this thing and
Speaker 5: it doesn't make any sense at all. I say, it's wonderful,
Speaker 5: it's perfect. It's as though you've drawn the first outline.
Speaker 5: The CIA says, it looks like you're at the right place. Okay,
Speaker 5: what else can you tell me? What else is happening
Speaker 5: when I when I hand you this object, what additional
Speaker 5: interesting thing comes to view?
Speaker 4: So I'm kind of picturing you handing me an object,
Speaker 4: and then.
Speaker 5: Let's yeah, are the objects in your hand? You can
Speaker 5: see this thing in your hand. Okay, what will come
Speaker 5: to view say yes, this this first sketch is not bad.
Speaker 5: We'd say you contacted the object. I'm not going to
Speaker 5: give you any clues. Like, all I'm allowed to say
Speaker 5: is tell me more. If you got over there on
Speaker 5: the left, that's very This.
Speaker 4: Is kind of like a little plant image that I
Speaker 4: thought of. I mean, it just came to me the
Speaker 4: idea that that would be sort of I don't know,
Speaker 4: it's just the image just arrived sort of like.
Speaker 3: Like that.
Speaker 5: So I judge would already be able to match up
Speaker 5: my object with your drive. So if we if you
Speaker 5: said I've got to go now, that's all I have,
Speaker 5: and I pulled out six possible objects from the closet
Speaker 5: along with my object, a judge would already be able
Speaker 5: to match. And I realized that you're struggling all the
Speaker 5: way that as you say this, this isn't it. This
Speaker 5: reminds me of something. This isn't it. But you already
Speaker 5: described my object.
Speaker 2: Isn't that interesting?
Speaker 5: Okay? Yes I would so you didn't have to pay
Speaker 5: me thousands of dollars from a viewing training.
Speaker 2: Huh.
Speaker 4: And here's what I have for you. Oh my god. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 4: it's it's almost like that.
Speaker 1: Look how crazy that is, dude. So this was the object.
Speaker 1: He drew that object on paper. He was like, I
Speaker 1: don't know, maybe it's like some kind of plant or
Speaker 1: something almost looks like a palm tree kind of looking thing.
Speaker 1: And the thing that he had in his hand was
Speaker 1: some kind of like metal thing that almost has the
Speaker 1: same kind of branches of what he was picturing in
Speaker 1: his mind. Wow, isn't that nuts?
Speaker 3: Dude?
Speaker 1: That quick too, Like, was that his first try? His
Speaker 1: first try? Yeah? Wow, that's what they say beginner's luck.
Speaker 1: But because you're allowing, you're not perceiving, you're not thinking,
Speaker 1: you're just allowing random shit to flow into your mind whatever,
Speaker 1: whatever seems random and almost like you don't have the
Speaker 1: full picture yet. That's probably what it is. Isn't that crazy, dude?
Speaker 1: And so he goes on to basically say, because this
Speaker 1: is Russell Togg teaching it, he kind of I don't
Speaker 1: want to say cheated, because telepathy is also awesome, but
Speaker 1: he was basically saying, we don't have to watch the
Speaker 1: rest of it. But Russell Targ was Russell Tug's the
Speaker 1: older guy. Russell targ was basically saying, now you were
Speaker 1: able to perceive that, which is amazing. I'm not trying
Speaker 1: to take anything away from you, but I kind of
Speaker 1: was sending you that message at the same time. So,
Speaker 1: but either way, whether it's telepathy or remote viewing or both,
Speaker 1: it's like, dude, he didn't whisper that information, He didn't
Speaker 1: tell him that information, he didn't hear those words. He
Speaker 1: was just drawing what came to his mind. And bang,
Speaker 1: through the use of remote viewing and a little bit
Speaker 1: of help from telepathy, he was able to get it.
Speaker 1: It's crazy. Yeah, So all of this kind of stuff
Speaker 1: can be experienced, and that's the beautiful thing about it.
Speaker 1: Now that being said, we're going to do a little
Speaker 1: experiment here at the end of the show. And at
Speaker 1: the end of the show meaning after the meditation. So
Speaker 1: anybody that's been listening for a few years you'll know
Speaker 1: that what we used to do. We used to always
Speaker 1: do a meditation at the end of the show, and
Speaker 1: it was always after the credits were rolling, so to say.
Speaker 1: And we like to do that because, first of all,
Speaker 1: meditation is probably the single most important thing you could
Speaker 1: ever do whenever you're trying to really enhance your spiritual
Speaker 1: journey that you're on. It is the most profound, magical
Speaker 1: thing that you could ever do. And you might think, oh, well,
Speaker 1: i'm having trouble turning off my thoughts or I'm thinking
Speaker 1: about this, or I'm thinking about that. You'll get there
Speaker 1: in practice. It is something it is to be practiced
Speaker 1: time and time and time again. Sean and I we
Speaker 1: actually got into a practice where we were doing it
Speaker 1: at least three times a week because we had three
Speaker 1: shows a week. So it's guaranteed meditation just about every
Speaker 1: other day, right, And that's a good place to start.
Speaker 1: But I definitely recommend that everybody tries to meditate at
Speaker 1: least once a day, once a day, even if it's
Speaker 1: only ten minutes, Like ten minutes is the minimum I
Speaker 1: would say. I wouldn't. I would say, don't go any
Speaker 1: less than that. Five minutes is good. But sometimes, and
Speaker 1: even me, I've been meditating regularly for years now, there's
Speaker 1: sometimes I'll listen to a meditation music and I won't
Speaker 1: really get into a like I won't get into a
Speaker 1: meditative zone until after six or seven minutes, and so
Speaker 1: now once I'm in there, for you know, if it's
Speaker 1: only a ten minute long meditation, and I only got
Speaker 1: there at six or seven minutes. Now I'm really only
Speaker 1: experiencing that meditative state for three or four minutes. And
Speaker 1: that's helpful, that's really good. That's better than no meditative minutes,
Speaker 1: you know, But to be able to get to what
Speaker 1: I like to call whenever I get into a deep meditation,
Speaker 1: I get to what I like to call my tree house,
Speaker 1: because that's what it feels like. It's almost as if,
Speaker 1: all right, whenever I'm fully awake, in the beatat state
Speaker 1: of mind that you're fully awake or having conversation, we're aware. Right,
Speaker 1: whenever I'm fully awake, I feel as if I am
Speaker 1: my whole body, right, Like I am my whole body.
Speaker 1: I'm not just my mouth, I'm not just my brain.
Speaker 1: I'm also my fingers, my toes, you know, my ass,
Speaker 1: all of that. Right, Whenever I go into a deep meditation,
Speaker 1: it's almost as if all of the energy that is
Speaker 1: me it rises and rises and rises, and then I'm
Speaker 1: just in I'm not even in my head, bro, I'm
Speaker 1: like above my head, above and outside of my head
Speaker 1: is where all of my conscious awareness sits. And it's
Speaker 1: then that I know then I'm in meditation. Then I
Speaker 1: know that, like, all right, something's going on now, because
Speaker 1: I'm perceiving from a different from a different place now.
Speaker 1: And you can just sit there, dude, like that, And
Speaker 1: that's what's magical about it. You can sit there and
Speaker 1: it makes it so much easier to observe your thoughts
Speaker 1: rather than be you know, swallowed up by them, and
Speaker 1: to identify as them. And that that is the first
Speaker 1: step in enhancing psychic abilities. It's the first step in
Speaker 1: enhancing telepathy or remote viewing or anything like that, because
Speaker 1: if you're just constantly identifying with your thoughts, you're always
Speaker 1: going to think that thinking is the most important way
Speaker 1: to do anything right using your thinking brain. But as
Speaker 1: we can tell with remote viewing, thinking is the last
Speaker 1: thing you want to do. You're just observing what comes.
Speaker 1: That's not thinking. That's the opposite. It's a big difference
Speaker 1: between observing and thinking, right. So that's why we want
Speaker 1: to implement it back into every single show. And we're
Speaker 1: not gonna be able to put the the actual meditations
Speaker 1: on the episodes we talked about before, because then there's
Speaker 1: copyrights and all this other bullshit, and and especially if
Speaker 1: you're listening to the podcast, you know, we have ads
Speaker 1: that are sprinkled in throughout the episode, and so the
Speaker 1: last thing we want is to play a meditation for
Speaker 1: y'all and then a radio ad interrupts you. That would
Speaker 1: just it like dude, and and even even with us
Speaker 1: before I learned about using duck duggo that blocks all
Speaker 1: the ads. It's like we would be listening and watching
Speaker 1: on Google or Safari or something like that for the
Speaker 1: for the meditation on YouTube, and every so often those
Speaker 1: assholes like to throw a fucking commercial in the middle
Speaker 1: of a meditation and it literally feels like lightning bolts
Speaker 1: get shocked and sent all the way up and down
Speaker 1: your body, and you're like, oh my god, it's good.
Speaker 1: It's not fun. It's not fun at all. So yeah,
Speaker 1: that's what we're we're to be doing. And so but
Speaker 1: the thing that we're gonna be doing instead is you
Speaker 1: can actually meditate along. So if you want to pause
Speaker 1: the show, we're actually gonna name the meditation that we're
Speaker 1: listening to. Usually they're not longer than ten or fifteen minutes,
Speaker 1: unless we do some of the uh the Gateway tapes,
Speaker 1: which eventually will do the Gateway Tapes. That's Robert Monroe
Speaker 1: who he was just talking about the Monroe Institute that
Speaker 1: Robert Monroe created what is known as the Gateway tapes,
Speaker 1: which are basically hemi sync frequencies that you're that you're hearing.
Speaker 1: So you hear one frequency in this year, one frequency
Speaker 1: in that ear, and after a while you get so
Speaker 1: meditated to where they start coming together and now you're
Speaker 1: left brain and your right brain are working in unison.
Speaker 1: So those are longer, those are like thirty forty forty
Speaker 1: five minutes something like that. We'll eventually get to that,
Speaker 1: because dude, those things are fucking powerful. They are powerful. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean, it's you're going on a whole journey. And
Speaker 1: to be honest, it don't even feel like forty minutes, bro,
Speaker 1: Like it feels like you're in there, Like it doesn't
Speaker 1: even feel like time is passing, like you're just existing
Speaker 1: in the poll of forever. And it's pretty powerful. But
Speaker 1: it'll teach you how to organize your thoughts and all
Speaker 1: this other kind of stuff. It's really powerful. That's not
Speaker 1: what we're doing today, although it would be a good idea,
Speaker 1: but I'm a little tired. I ain't got time for
Speaker 1: a forty minute meditation. We'll get to it eventually. That
Speaker 1: being said, so what we're gonna do is is we're
Speaker 1: gonna have a little experiment. We're gonna meditate first, we're
Speaker 1: gonna tell y'all what the meditation is at the end
Speaker 1: of the show and uh, and then we're gonna see
Speaker 1: if we can get a little beginner's luck with remote viewing. So, Cody,
Speaker 1: I'm going to come up with some coordinates and it's
Speaker 1: gonna be totally random. It's not gonna be a place
Speaker 1: that I know that you know that I know, it's
Speaker 1: not gonna be anything like that, right, It's going to
Speaker 1: be completely random, and I'm not even fucking with you.
Speaker 1: It is going to be the most random shit. And
Speaker 1: that way, there's no way that you're ever gonna be
Speaker 1: able to think or guess. That's the point. I don't
Speaker 1: want you to guess. I don't want you to think.
Speaker 1: I want just whatever comes to you after the meditation,
Speaker 1: because you're always you're already going to be in a
Speaker 1: meditated state, right, and that's the best way to be
Speaker 1: able to remote view. So if you're interested in hearing
Speaker 1: about if Cody can be spot on with a remote
Speaker 1: viewing then listen in for the rest of the show.
Speaker 1: That being said, Cody, what do you think about remote viewing? Like,
Speaker 1: do you believe that it's attainable? Is it something that
Speaker 1: you think that you might be able to like flip
Speaker 1: the switch in your mind, turn off the thinking brain
Speaker 1: and allow whatever comes to you. Do you think that
Speaker 1: you could do something like that?
Speaker 3: Very possible, but I think it'd be easier if somebody
Speaker 3: who was telepathically sending me signals.
Speaker 1: Well, you know what, just because we're beginning whenever, whenever
Speaker 1: you're trying to perceive it, we won't do the double
Speaker 1: blind tonight because it's the first time, and so I'll
Speaker 1: well do my best. I don't even know how powerful
Speaker 1: I am at that, but we'll see. I'll do my
Speaker 1: best to Whenever I give you the coordinates of a location,
Speaker 1: I'll do my best to try and telepathically send it
Speaker 1: to you as well. Okay, Now keep in mind we
Speaker 1: are in completely different portions of the country. Cody is
Speaker 1: over there in Arizona. I'm in Louisiana. Now this is
Speaker 1: a zoom call, and we are brothers, so there's a
Speaker 1: little bit of quantum entanglement there, But as far as
Speaker 1: information goes, I don't know. Maybe it's kind of like
Speaker 1: like twins are always on the same wavelength, you know,
Speaker 1: they can almost pick up on each other's thoughts. We're
Speaker 1: not twins. I'm four years older than you, but yeah
Speaker 1: we still got you know, years of experience together, so
Speaker 1: maybe we can get there. But yeah, I'll try my
Speaker 1: best to try and give you that telepathic message.
Speaker 3: Okay, and I'm gonna come back with like details, maybe
Speaker 3: a temperature or like lines or or a description or
Speaker 3: do you want me to give you like the straight
Speaker 3: up where are you at? Type of deal?
Speaker 1: No, no, no, I want you to don't even worry
Speaker 1: about the amount of information, Like if you only perceive
Speaker 1: one thing, if you only perceive one thing, it's hot,
Speaker 1: that's all I got. It's cold, that's all I got.
Speaker 1: My nipp's got a little that my nips got a
Speaker 1: little hard, so it must have been a little cold.
Speaker 1: Where you're trying to go something like that, I'm not
Speaker 1: saying it's gonna be that extreme, but like, you know, whatever,
Speaker 1: however subtle it is, and the information that you're gonna
Speaker 1: get is so subtle you're almost gonna forget that, like
Speaker 1: it was a random thought. And that's where you got
Speaker 1: to trap it right right. You know got this, I
Speaker 1: know you got it. You can do it. So give
Speaker 1: me one minute. We got to shuffle these bad boys up,
Speaker 1: these tarot cards and see if we can get a
Speaker 1: good message to give Cody and to the one out there.
Speaker 3: Of course, dude, while you're doing that, can I just
Speaker 3: tell us about the uh some interesting facts about remote
Speaker 3: viewing please happened in the past. Yeah, go ahead, So
Speaker 3: locating a drowned Soviet bomber. In nineteen seventy eight, when
Speaker 3: a Soviet two twenty two bomber crashed into the African wilderness,
Speaker 3: American satellites could not locate the wreckage. Remote viewer Rosemary
Speaker 3: Smith was given the target and pinpointed the crash site
Speaker 3: within several miles of its actual location, allowing US teams
Speaker 3: to recover secret Soviet codes before the KGB arrived.
Speaker 1: What are the statistical odds of that? Really?
Speaker 3: Another one the Soviet Typhoon class submarine. Renowned remote viewer
Speaker 3: Ingo Swan and Army officer Joe mcmonagle were given geographical
Speaker 3: coordinates for a massive secret industrial building in sever daunts
Speaker 3: sever Donvinsky USSR Monocle correctly drew a massive, multi hauled
Speaker 3: submarine equipped with Cant Canton missile tubes. A month later,
Speaker 3: satellite image imagery confirmed the construction of the world's largest submarine,
Speaker 3: the Typhoon class, exactly as described. That's cool. And then
Speaker 3: my favorite one, the rings of Jupiter. In nineteen seventy three,
Speaker 3: before NASA's Voyager one spacecraft flew past Jupiter, Ingo Swan
Speaker 3: conducted a remote viewing session targeting targeting the planet. He
Speaker 3: explicitly noted the presence of a faint rings of light
Speaker 3: Saturn like ring system surrounding Jupiter.
Speaker 1: All Right, technical difficulties. Again, we're out of mercury retrograde,
Speaker 1: so I don't know what the hell's going on. But
Speaker 1: you know, that's that's typically what happens. It's almost like
Speaker 1: there's electrical interference. As soon as there's things that are
Speaker 1: spinning in the mind and as they're opening up in
Speaker 1: your mind, it's almost like too much electricity. There's too
Speaker 1: much going on here. We need to shut it down,
Speaker 1: you know. Yes, that's usually how I like to look
Speaker 1: at it. And that's typically what happens anytime somebody's having
Speaker 1: like some kind of spiritual event. Delores Cannon used to
Speaker 1: always talk about this. Anytime she would get too deep
Speaker 1: in a past life regression, her tape recorder would stop,
Speaker 1: a light bulb would burn out, the radio would automatically
Speaker 1: out of nowhere, you know, turn on to the TV
Speaker 1: or something like that, like strange electrical happenings. Not saying
Speaker 1: that that's what's happening. Could just be faulty cables, who knows,
Speaker 1: but you know, I like to play the mystical game.
Speaker 1: So that being said, yeah, that is fascinating. So if
Speaker 1: he was kind of cutting out there, you know, with
Speaker 1: the with the interference, but basically, Ingo Swan was able
Speaker 1: to identify that there were rings around Jupiter before NASA
Speaker 1: was even aware of them by remote viewing Jupiter. How
Speaker 1: it makes no sense. And actually the if you look
Speaker 1: into the the Hopie tribes, which is a it's a
Speaker 1: native group. They have like the the Hope prophecies and
Speaker 1: the Blue Star Kachina and stuff like that, they were
Speaker 1: able to identify that there was a there was like
Speaker 1: another another planet behind something like that. And it's like,
Speaker 1: how are people able to identify stuff without telescopes, without
Speaker 1: you know, technology, or anything like that, they're not seeing
Speaker 1: it in the night fucking sky, especially if allegedly all
Speaker 1: of these planets are you know, fifty million light years
Speaker 1: away or whatever, like, you're not seeing it. But for
Speaker 1: some reason, these people and everybody else you can go
Speaker 1: into a meditation and perceive what is imperceptible to technology
Speaker 1: even sometimes. And the fact that he was able to
Speaker 1: do that back you said it was back in the seventies. Yes,
Speaker 1: it's like seventy five or something like that. But but yeah,
Speaker 1: fascinating that he was able to do that. Speaking of fascinating,
Speaker 1: we got seventy three. Okay, speaking of fascinating, let me
Speaker 1: just show you this card that we got for the
Speaker 1: tarot card reading. Okay, so what you have here is
Speaker 1: the two of wands, yes, the two of wanes. And
Speaker 1: what you see is is that there's a guy. He's
Speaker 1: standing in between two wands and he's holding the left one,
Speaker 1: the other one standing on its own. He's looking out
Speaker 1: at the beautiful beach scenery. There's mountains in the background,
Speaker 1: a bunch of greenery and everything. But he's holding what
Speaker 1: seems to be some kind of sphere or ball or
Speaker 1: globe in his hand. There I even say, and the
Speaker 1: meaning just by looking at it. I have one of
Speaker 1: those cheater tarot decks which gives you a couple of
Speaker 1: words as to what it means. I was like, oh
Speaker 1: my god, Literally, it means anticipation, expectation, discovery, and decisions.
Speaker 1: That's pretty crazy, right, talking about remote viewing. And we
Speaker 1: get a card like that. Now we're gonna go a
Speaker 1: little bit deeper. But I thought, holy shit, what are
Speaker 1: we doing here? Right?
Speaker 3: So?
Speaker 1: The two of wands a choice to expand your world?
Speaker 1: Awaits okay, what okay?
Speaker 3: That's expanding?
Speaker 1: Do you stay with what you know? Or do you
Speaker 1: choose the unknown adventure? The two of Wand's card is
Speaker 1: an invitation to ponder the future. A man looks out
Speaker 1: onto the vast expanse of land from a position high
Speaker 1: up in his luxurious castle. Didn't I just say that
Speaker 1: I go up in my fucking treehouse in meditation too?
Speaker 3: Right? Right?
Speaker 1: He has already established his position of stability, and now
Speaker 1: he craves adventure. One wand is securely anchored to the
Speaker 1: castle walls, showing his efforts to build his fortune, while
Speaker 1: the other wand is held above his head in in
Speaker 1: his other hand. He holds a globe as if to
Speaker 1: say the world is in his hands. Sounds very familiar,
Speaker 1: a little bit to what Ingo Swan was saying, like
Speaker 1: miss me with hiding things in boxes, it's below me.
Speaker 1: It's elementary, almost as if to say like he's fucking
Speaker 1: Sherlock or something. Right, He's like, dude, I'm not. I'm
Speaker 1: beyond colors and numbers here. Let's get specific. I want
Speaker 1: to know your thoughts. Okay, And so it says where
Speaker 1: will he go next? The two of one signals an
Speaker 1: opportunity to plan for the next exciting phase in an
Speaker 1: already rich and full life. All Right, I'll take that
Speaker 1: as that's a perfect reading. I would say, dude, as
Speaker 1: far as you know, like as far as this episode goes, yes,
Speaker 1: it's pretty spot on. So the spiritual message says, weigh
Speaker 1: your options before making a big decision, and heat intuitive
Speaker 1: guidance in your decision making process. You're making plans and
Speaker 1: taking your goals to the next level in phase of life,
Speaker 1: which is exciting. Your life continues to be enriched when
Speaker 1: you follow a spiritual path and explore new directions. Beautiful, beautiful,
Speaker 1: I love it. Great card shout out to the two
Speaker 1: of Wand's shout out to the Tarot. This mystical, this
Speaker 1: mystical stuff that we just find ourselves in. It just
Speaker 1: never ceases to amaze me. That being said, all right,
Speaker 1: we are going to get into some meditation and maybe
Speaker 1: a little remote viewing. We're gonna try and see what
Speaker 1: we can do here. Maybe Cody can remote view. It's
Speaker 1: also just an intro, so there's no pressure or anything
Speaker 1: like that. Just allow it to come. If it doesn't come, whatever,
Speaker 1: no big deal. Okay, So that being said, we are
Speaker 1: going to end this episode, so hopefully you guys really
Speaker 1: enjoyed the remote remote viewing episode. Sorry about the technical
Speaker 1: difficulties and all of that kind of stuff. It happens
Speaker 1: whenever you're working with technology. Sometimes shit just goes to shit.
Speaker 1: But we were able to finally get through it after
Speaker 1: several hours. Hey dude, we love doing this stuff. That's
Speaker 1: why we do it, you know. And we want to
Speaker 1: say thank you to everybody that has been a listener
Speaker 1: of the show, a follower, if you've recommended this show
Speaker 1: to any of your friends or family members or coworkers
Speaker 1: or whatever. We could all stand to benefit from information
Speaker 1: like this. Whenever you know that your life is not
Speaker 1: as mundane as you are led to believe. Whenever you
Speaker 1: know that your abilities are not mundane, you're not just
Speaker 1: another you know, another somebody or another nobody that you
Speaker 1: have these these abilities that are innate within you because
Speaker 1: you're part of the whole thing and they're Look, if
Speaker 1: somebody can do it, you can do it. That's I
Speaker 1: firmly believe that, especially whenever it comes to like all
Speaker 1: of this psychic kind of abilities. We all have the
Speaker 1: ability to tap into this kind of stuff. And if
Speaker 1: you don't know that, just try it for yourself. The
Speaker 1: best place to do that is on in meditation for sure.
Speaker 1: That's where it all starts. Really, So if you're interested
Speaker 1: in helping promote the show, we'd really appreciate it. Maybe
Speaker 1: you want to share this with your friends and family members.
Speaker 1: However you want to do it, you can like and
Speaker 1: if you're on YouTube, you can subscribe and like and share.
Speaker 1: Do all the things. Hit the bell. You know how
Speaker 1: YouTube works. It really helps push us in the algorithm.
Speaker 1: Leave a comment or a review on Apple Podcasts or
Speaker 1: Spotify that also helps. But the best way to be
Speaker 1: able to help is to buy. Going over to Patreon
Speaker 1: dot com slash metamistics and signing up over there. Dude,
Speaker 1: you want to be able to get all these shows
Speaker 1: completely commercial free days if not a week or more
Speaker 1: in advance, and be able to join the community of
Speaker 1: the one that is already there and it's always a
Speaker 1: strong community. And if you want to join us every
Speaker 1: Wednesday night for the live show, go sign up for
Speaker 1: that Wonder Wednesday Tier. You'll have access to all of
Speaker 1: that plus being able to join us in the live show.
Speaker 1: We really appreciate everybody. It's already done so so far,
Speaker 1: and we love you. So this is where we leave you. Look,
Speaker 1: if remode viewing came hearing it taught you anything, it's
Speaker 1: that you don't know what you don't know, So don't
Speaker 1: just get weird, stay weird, all right. If you're listening
Speaker 1: to this after show, welcome back. Unfortunately, we were not
Speaker 1: able to listen to a meditation tonight. Cody is having
Speaker 1: major technical difficulties. His headphones keep on going out and
Speaker 1: that's just going to interrupt the meditation. So we'll get
Speaker 1: back to that in the next episode. But that doesn't
Speaker 1: mean we can't try and remote view. So Cody, take
Speaker 1: about twenty seconds close your eyes and get totally relaxed,
Speaker 1: empty out your mind. You don't necessarily have to be
Speaker 1: in a meditative state, but just identify your thoughts as
Speaker 1: your thoughts, and if there's any kind of other information
Speaker 1: that's gonna come in, allowed to come in whenever I
Speaker 1: say so. I'll let you know whenever I give you
Speaker 1: the coordinates and start sending it telepathically to you. So
Speaker 1: it shouldn't take very long, because uh, it's just an
Speaker 1: emptying You just go to the nothingness, go to the
Speaker 1: fucking void. There's nothing there. The only thing that is
Speaker 1: there in that void is you, an infinite potential that
Speaker 1: is being represented by nothingness. And inside that nothingness, the
Speaker 1: only thing you're gonna find is you, and on top
Speaker 1: of the only thing that you're gonna find outside of you.
Speaker 1: It's just a tiny little bit of information, and that's
Speaker 1: what we're looking for. We don't need big picture. Just
Speaker 1: whatever comes to your mind could be subtle. Maybe it
Speaker 1: wakes you up and slaps you in the face. However
Speaker 1: it goes, however it comes to you, it's up to
Speaker 1: you to perceive it. Those coreits are thirty six point
Speaker 1: zero five eight nine degrees north by one hundred and
Speaker 1: twelve point one zero nine to two degrees west, and
Speaker 1: I am sending you images telepathically. So take a minute
Speaker 1: and just imagine any of the senses that come to you.
Speaker 1: Could be anything, literally, anything doesn't even have to be temperature,
Speaker 1: just what comes to you in your mind, subtle as
Speaker 1: it may be. Okay, what'll we got?
Speaker 3: What I'm visualizing? It doesn't make any sense at all,
Speaker 3: so hopefully that's a good thing. But is like a
Speaker 3: green and yellow I don't know what it is, but
Speaker 3: there's green and yellow in it, almost like Wisconsin or
Speaker 3: something like Green Bay or something like that. And there's water,
Speaker 3: maybe a bridge.
Speaker 1: Mm hmm.
Speaker 3: And that's really all I got other than a bee,
Speaker 3: like a like a B sound.
Speaker 1: A b sound, yes, hm hmm, like a humming of swords,
Speaker 1: you mean, like.
Speaker 3: A flying like real minor like you could barely hear it.
Speaker 1: So you're able to sense green and yellow. And you
Speaker 1: were able to sense would you say, water or a
Speaker 1: bridge or something like that? Yes, yes, that's funny. I'm
Speaker 1: going to share the screen right now, and remember not
Speaker 1: everything is going to be spot on, but the few
Speaker 1: things that you were able to identify, were you able
Speaker 1: to identify a temperature at all.
Speaker 3: No, no, I tried, but I didn't want to force it.
Speaker 1: Good job, good job, Yeah, you never want to force
Speaker 1: these things. Let me fucking blow your mind. It was
Speaker 1: the Grand Canyon. There's your greens and your yellows in
Speaker 1: these trees, right, there's your river that flows through the
Speaker 1: Grand Canyon itself. So not necessarily a bridge. But what's
Speaker 1: interesting about a bridge is that you're in Lake Havasu
Speaker 1: City otherwise known as the London Bridge location, and the
Speaker 1: Grand Canyon is also in Arizona. So maybe you were
Speaker 1: piecing that together. And it's interesting how you're able to
Speaker 1: draw all this together. But just the fact that you
Speaker 1: were able to get green and yellow. This was the
Speaker 1: image I had pulled up. This is what I was
Speaker 1: sending you that, not any random image of the Grand Canyon,
Speaker 1: but this specific one.
Speaker 3: Man.
Speaker 1: Okay, okay, So that's crazy that you're able to get
Speaker 1: that information, right right, Okay. Now what I want you
Speaker 1: to do is let me try. Yep, all right, So
Speaker 1: what you do is is open up your Safari okay
Speaker 1: and or whatever Doug dot Go or whatever it is,
Speaker 1: chrome and think of a location. Any location doesn't even
Speaker 1: matter doesn't have to be a place that we've ever
Speaker 1: been to, doesn't have to even be a place that
Speaker 1: I've ever heard of. It could be anywhere, anything, any
Speaker 1: time of year, doesn't matter, okay. And so you pick
Speaker 1: the location and then write coordinates to dot dot dot Okay,
Speaker 1: and can give you the right coordinates too. Yep. So
Speaker 1: I'm going to slip into a slight trance here and
Speaker 1: see what comes to my mind. So don't say anything,
Speaker 1: just just let me know, give me about twenty seconds,
Speaker 1: and then after twenty seconds, tell me the coordinates.
Speaker 3: Okay, we are at thirty seven degrees fourteen zero north,
Speaker 3: one hundred and fifteen degrees forty eight thirty west.
Speaker 1: All right, I'm probably not gonna be do as good
Speaker 1: as you did, because you did really well. But what
Speaker 1: I got was a lot of green, Like a lot
Speaker 1: of green could have been, could have been grass, shrubs, trees,
Speaker 1: something like that. Maybe it was I got the sense
Speaker 1: that maybe we're talking about like a national forest or
Speaker 1: something along those lines. A bear. A bear came in
Speaker 1: my mind. I'm not I don't know if that has
Speaker 1: anything to do with it. Am I am I anywhere close.
Speaker 3: Closer than you think?
Speaker 1: Really?
Speaker 3: Yes, how do I screen share this?
Speaker 2: Oh?
Speaker 1: There we go. Oh you typed in area fifty one.
Speaker 1: That's hilarious.
Speaker 3: Yeah, dude, you were like a whole bunch of green.
Speaker 3: I don't know if it's shrubs or bushes or what.
Speaker 1: Like tumbleweeds or something.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and this is the image that I pulled up,
Speaker 3: that that specific image, Yes, this is the one.
Speaker 1: Isn't that crazy? That is just the smallest little thing,
Speaker 1: you know, I mean, and that's why I said. I
Speaker 1: was like, I don't know. It could be trees, could
Speaker 1: be shrubs, could be grass, I don't know. That's kind
Speaker 1: of what's flashing to me though. Yeah, and wow, Now
Speaker 1: obviously it could have been any color or whatever. But
Speaker 1: just the simple fact that I got one thing right,
Speaker 1: I'm good with that, right, Yeah, and that dominates, Like
Speaker 1: at least sixty percent of the photo was a lot
Speaker 1: of green, So you hit that dude. Wow, all right, Yeah,
Speaker 1: you can stop sharing. That's crazy, dude. We're both Hey, dude,
Speaker 1: we're just beginners and it takes a little while. But
Speaker 1: that's the thing is that with practice, we can really
Speaker 1: get good at a lot of this, and that that's
Speaker 1: the same thing that goes for telepathy or psychokinesis or
Speaker 1: you know what whatever you wanna you know, develop full
Speaker 1: on fucking Matilda skills. There you go. It's it's a
Speaker 1: learned thing. So yeah, dude, what'd you think about this? Like,
Speaker 1: it's pretty cool learning about this kind of stuff, right,
Speaker 1: I like it a lot. Hell yeah, dude. All right,
Speaker 1: well look for the one out there. Thank you for
Speaker 1: riding along. Hopefully you really enjoyed this episode, and uh,
Speaker 1: we're gonna get back at you next time. So until
Speaker 1: next time, we love you and we'll see you on
Speaker 1: the flip side.