Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: As a clock strikes thirteen, it's Thursday, the thirtieth of April.
Speaker 2: You have our lord, twenty twenty six. Well, today we're
Speaker 2: going to take a look at the Supreme Court. They've
Speaker 2: made a ruling about jerrymandering. A lot of people saying, wait,
Speaker 2: this is we had set asides or based on race.
Speaker 2: This is overturning the Civil Rights Act. We're going to
Speaker 2: take a look at the implications of that, and really,
Speaker 2: what is happening with our elections? And then what is
Speaker 2: happening with our wars? As elan Omar said, she made
Speaker 2: a reference to World War eleven because somebody wrote it down,
Speaker 2: I guess, and her staff as the Roman numerals. I
Speaker 2: guess she could be forgiven because we're in the constant
Speaker 2: state of war. Perhaps we have had eleven wars since
Speaker 2: the World War, but things are only getting worse. People
Speaker 2: in Wall Street who adopted the acronym Taco, don't worry.
Speaker 2: Trump always chickens out. Tryff'sn't going to be as bad
Speaker 2: as they're now. They're saying about the war, it's not
Speaker 2: cho and we'll tell you what that means when we
Speaker 2: come up. And then open AI is talking about their
Speaker 2: plans for how super intelligent artificial intelligence is going to
Speaker 2: serve mankind. I think we've heard that before, don't we. Oh,
Speaker 2: and al Gore has switched his opinionion on climate change.
Speaker 2: We're now going to go into an ice age again. Well,
Speaker 2: let's begin with the Supreme Court. And we have the
Speaker 2: Supreme Court. First of all, before this big decision about
Speaker 2: gerrymandering that negated parts of the Civil Rights Act, the
Speaker 2: set asides for racial districting and that type of thing.
Speaker 2: First of all, the Supreme Court sided with a pro
Speaker 2: life pregnancy centers that were being targeted by the new
Speaker 2: Jersey Attorney general. This is a guy who, in response
Speaker 2: to their previous Supreme Court decision saying we're going to
Speaker 2: get the federal government out of this, overturning Roe v. Wade.
Speaker 2: This is a guy who, in response to that back
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty two, he put out consumer warnings and
Speaker 2: alarms calling people, don't go to these pregnancy crisis centers,
Speaker 2: go to Planned Parenthood instead. And he has been joined
Speaker 2: at the hip with them so much so that he
Speaker 2: was telling these different pregnancy centers that he was demanding
Speaker 2: and threatening them with contempt of court and other things
Speaker 2: like that, that they had to give him all kinds
Speaker 2: of information about their donor list. So the Supreme Court
Speaker 2: has now unanimously backed a group of faith based pregnancy
Speaker 2: centers in New Jersey to allow them to challenge this
Speaker 2: in court.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 2: I don't know why they needed to have the Supreme
Speaker 2: Court's permission to challenge this, but evidently some of the
Speaker 2: courts said they didn't have standing or something. They appealed that.
Speaker 2: I'm not sure exactly the basis of it, but what
Speaker 2: was it. The core of all this was really heinous.
Speaker 2: As I said before, there were twenty eight categories of
Speaker 2: documents being demanded by the New Jersey Attorney General, including
Speaker 2: records with donors' names, phone numbers, addresses, and places of employment.
Speaker 2: The sweeping subpoena did not explain why the Attorney journal
Speaker 2: sought these records. It also warned twice the failure to
Speaker 2: comply may render the group liable for contempt of court
Speaker 2: and for other penalties. So the guy who did this,
Speaker 2: the Attorney General in New Jersey, a democratic course, His
Speaker 2: name is Plaquin. He strongly poor abortion. It issued the
Speaker 2: consumer alert that I mentioned before. After the reversal of
Speaker 2: Roby Wade in twenty twenty two, he'd announced pregnancy centers.
Speaker 2: His office collaborated on the notice with Planned Parenthood, and
Speaker 2: he urged women to discuss distrust pro life centers, go
Speaker 2: to the pro death centers. That's where you really need
Speaker 2: to go. Just amazing. Karen worked as a volunteer for
Speaker 2: one of these pregnancy counseling places, and you know, they're
Speaker 2: just trying to help people. They're not trying to kill anybody.
Speaker 2: But that's what Clanned Parenthood is killing for hire, and
Speaker 2: it's just it truly as amazing what these people are doing.
Speaker 2: The Supreme Court said that plack and subpoena caused an
Speaker 2: ongoing injury to the pregnancy center's First Amendment rights and
Speaker 2: sent the case back to the lower courts for further
Speaker 2: proceedings consistent with this opinion. So perhaps they lost in
Speaker 2: the New Jersey courts and they appealed to Supreme Court.
Speaker 2: The Supreme Court does do that from time time, they
Speaker 2: say here's what we think about this, unanimously, maybe you
Speaker 2: should rethink this at the lower court level. So perhaps
Speaker 2: that's what's going on. An official demand for private donor
Speaker 2: information is enough to discourage reasonable individuals from associating with
Speaker 2: a group. It's enough to discourage groups from expressing dissident views,
Speaker 2: said Justice Neil Gorsich. I would imagine they could apply
Speaker 2: that same logic to the eighty six forty seven charges
Speaker 2: that are out there as well. We'll talk about that later,
Speaker 2: but anyway, there was a brief that was filed the
Speaker 2: GOP states, several of them, and filed to Friends of
Speaker 2: the Court brief. There was also a friend of the
Speaker 2: Court briefs filed by Democrats, and you had a lot.
Speaker 2: You had eighteen Democrat state attorneys general, led by the
Speaker 2: Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell, backed New Jersey's efforts
Speaker 2: to intimidate and so just think about that. That's why
Speaker 2: I say, when you look at the state elections, that
Speaker 2: is really crucial. Don't ignore the power of the states
Speaker 2: to be evil or to be a defender of what
Speaker 2: is right. The state elections and local elections really do
Speaker 2: matter a lot. The US Conference of Catholic Bishops, Arizona Legislature,
Speaker 2: and various other pro life groups have supported the Center,
Speaker 2: who was appealing this and saying we're not going to
Speaker 2: be forced to turn over all of our records to you,
Speaker 2: which then brings us to the Supreme Court decision that
Speaker 2: everyone is talking about, and that is the weakening of
Speaker 2: the Voting Rights Act. The Supreme Court says AP this
Speaker 2: is their establishment media version of what happened. The Supreme
Speaker 2: Court on Wednesday hollowed out a landmark Civil rights era
Speaker 2: law that had increased minority representation in Congress and elsewhere,
Speaker 2: striking down a majority black congressional district in Louisiana, opening
Speaker 2: the door for more redistricting across the country that could
Speaker 2: aid Republican efforts to control the House. And of course,
Speaker 2: in the wake of this, you had Marshall Blackburn, senator
Speaker 2: from North Carolina. In North Carolina lived there for so
Speaker 2: long I think I still do. A senator from Tennessee
Speaker 2: who's running for governor here in Tennessee. She immediately said,
Speaker 2: we need to make sure that there are no Democrat
Speaker 2: representatives from Tennessee. There's only one that is out of Memphis,
Speaker 2: and so we can see how this is going to
Speaker 2: be used. Here's my opinion about all this stuff. As
Speaker 2: a matter of fact, in Nashville or strongholds for Democrats,
Speaker 2: and they have a large proportion of black people who
Speaker 2: live in those cities as well. And what happened was
Speaker 2: that you had a Democrat representative from Nashville that was
Speaker 2: redistricted out of their district. He said, Well, in spite
Speaker 2: of all the polls showing how popular he was against
Speaker 2: his opponent, he said, with the redistricting, we couldn't get
Speaker 2: around that. And that's the way it really does work. Folks,
Speaker 2: you know, think about this in the broader terms, because
Speaker 2: this happens both ways for both parties. And I saw
Speaker 2: this happen in North Carolina. I've talked about this many times.
Speaker 2: In two thousand and eight, Obama carried North Carolina, but
Speaker 2: by the midterms, people didn't like what they saw. So
Speaker 2: what happened was it was a backlash in North Carolina.
Speaker 2: In twenty ten, all the elections went to Republicans except
Speaker 2: for congressional races. It was the first time Republicans that
Speaker 2: had control of the state House and Senate since the
Speaker 2: Civil War, since reconstruction, the very first time, and that
Speaker 2: was the backlash on it. However, in spite of this
Speaker 2: massive sea change of people going from Democrat to Republican
Speaker 2: in North Carolina, you had zero change in the congressional delegation.
Speaker 2: But twenty ten was a census year, and so the
Speaker 2: new Republican majority redistricted after that, and then after that
Speaker 2: the next election you had a big change in the
Speaker 2: congressional makeup that shifted towards Republicans. Now is what's the
Speaker 2: lesson of that? Well, the lesson is is that even
Speaker 2: though when you look at the election in twenty ten,
Speaker 2: even though North Carolina was swinging heavily Republican, not a
Speaker 2: thing changed in congressional representation because of the Democrats jerry mannering.
Speaker 2: And then when the Republicublicans did the gerrymandering, it went
Speaker 2: the other way, and the Democrats began suing over and
Speaker 2: over again. You know, probably ever since then, they've been
Speaker 2: suing about redistricting. I don't like jerry mandering. I don't
Speaker 2: like the government. I don't like a political party picking
Speaker 2: the voters for any reason, for race, for political affiliation,
Speaker 2: for any of these reasons. They do the same type
Speaker 2: of thing that they do to juries, where they rig
Speaker 2: the jury by jury selection. You after stand, the way
Speaker 2: that elections are corrupted is far deeper and earlier than
Speaker 2: electronic voting or voting by mail. Those are just additional
Speaker 2: cherries on the top of a massive pile of excrement. Folks,
Speaker 2: the UH when you look at what they actually do,
Speaker 2: they pick the voters with the jerry mandering, and they
Speaker 2: can make sure that their party gets elected. That ought
Speaker 2: to be a stop right there. They say, we're not
Speaker 2: going to do jerry mandering. We're not going to do
Speaker 2: it for race, we're not going to do it for
Speaker 2: anything else. Of course they typically do it by party,
Speaker 2: but I feel that what they ought to do is
Speaker 2: the only way you're going to shut down jerry mandering
Speaker 2: is to tell them you're going to draw contiguous geographical districts.
Speaker 2: You're not going to have these winding snakes that run
Speaker 2: down a road and hop from one side to the other,
Speaker 2: you know, picking the people one by one, because they
Speaker 2: have the ability to do that with computers, and so
Speaker 2: you have to say, you're just going to have these
Speaker 2: large geographical areas that are going to be numerically based.
Speaker 2: You're going to have about the same number of people
Speaker 2: in this district as we do over here, but you're
Speaker 2: going to be forbidden from looking at any characteristics of
Speaker 2: these people. You can't look at their race, their political party,
Speaker 2: you can't look at their their religious affiliation. Whatever information
Speaker 2: you can get, and they can get a lot of information.
Speaker 2: Believe me, that's the whole purpose of geospacial intelligence. They've
Speaker 2: been working on that since the late nineteen nineties, and
Speaker 2: now with artificial intelligence, they have the ability to go
Speaker 2: much deeper. So we've got to stop that. We're going
Speaker 2: to make it illegal for the people who are drawing
Speaker 2: up these congressional districts to look at anything other than
Speaker 2: a just gross headcount. We're going to have about the
Speaker 2: same number of voters in each of these congressional districts,
Speaker 2: end of story. If you do anything else, you're going
Speaker 2: to be pawns in the hands of these two corrupt
Speaker 2: political parties that I despise. You should despise them as well.
Speaker 2: You should look at what both of these parties have
Speaker 2: done the longest time, and I don't want to have
Speaker 2: anything to do with them and not give them the
Speaker 2: ability to determine who the voters are going to be
Speaker 2: in a district, who's going to get on the ballot.
Speaker 2: They control that very heavily, who's going to get into
Speaker 2: the debates. I mean, if we don't if we can't
Speaker 2: select the candidates instead of them selecting the voters, if
Speaker 2: we don't have an open ballot, if we don't have
Speaker 2: open debates, what's the point of an election. That's the
Speaker 2: real bottom line here. So don't get caught up in
Speaker 2: the civil rights stuff and racial quotas and districts. They
Speaker 2: shouldn't know anything about you. It ought to just be
Speaker 2: a head count situation. That's what I believe about this.
Speaker 2: No rigging is the only way that you're going to
Speaker 2: be able to stop the gerry mandering, something that was
Speaker 2: done from the very beginning. I mean, they didn't have
Speaker 2: that kind of granular information, but it started at the
Speaker 2: very beginning of America. Jerry Mandering has been around forever.
Speaker 2: They were the ones who came up with that. They
Speaker 2: drew a district the guy said, looks like a salamander,
Speaker 2: and so they called it jerry mandering. I don't know
Speaker 2: if the guy's name was Jerry, but the you know,
Speaker 2: you can do that type of thing by figuring out, well,
Speaker 2: I know that in the city the people are predominantly
Speaker 2: voting for one particular party of other, typically Democrats, So
Speaker 2: we're going to go through this city. I'm going to
Speaker 2: include that that's going to be a safe congressional district
Speaker 2: for theocrats. It's what they would do. But you need
Speaker 2: to as much as you can prohibit that, and certainly
Speaker 2: prohibit them from going down to the granular detail that
Speaker 2: they're currently doing, where they can go down the street
Speaker 2: and jump from one side to the other. It was
Speaker 2: that way thirty forty years ago when I was running
Speaker 2: for Congress. They had a congressional district in North Carolina
Speaker 2: that did exactly that. It snaked through and I forget
Speaker 2: the name of the road, but it just followed this road,
Speaker 2: jumping from one side to the other, picking the political
Speaker 2: party that they wanted to stick into that congressional district.
Speaker 2: So they go back to Lyndon Johnson's civil rights thing
Speaker 2: lost sixty years ago, And I guess got to say
Speaker 2: that if if I see anything with Lyndon Johnson's signature
Speaker 2: on it, I would immediately throw it in the trash can.
Speaker 2: Maybe that's what's happening about out of here. That's right,
Speaker 2: deep Sick's that eighty six that? Yeah, So anyway, this
Speaker 2: is this is something that was a pretty strong decision
Speaker 2: by the Supreme Court. Kagan said, the upshot of the
Speaker 2: decision is that states can, without legal consequence, systematically dilute
Speaker 2: minority citizens voting power. Let me just say that the
Speaker 2: jury mandering dilutes everybody's voting power. What the jury mandering
Speaker 2: does is that empowers these political parties, and of course
Speaker 2: they fight each other, but they're not about responding to us.
Speaker 2: We have absolutely nothing that no input into this. We
Speaker 2: can't pick the candidates, we can't see them debate each other,
Speaker 2: and they picked who the voters are going to be
Speaker 2: in a particular district, and you can't get around that.
Speaker 2: Quite frankly, it's such a powerful thing that they do. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: the response from Republican in the White House says, this
Speaker 2: is a complete and total victory for the American voters. Well, no,
Speaker 2: actually it isn't, because there's still as long as they're
Speaker 2: doing jury mandering, as long as they've got the ability
Speaker 2: to look at various factors. I mean, the other thing
Speaker 2: they can do they can play games with not just
Speaker 2: with race, they can look at your income and other
Speaker 2: things like that and make assumptions about that. So it
Speaker 2: is a sordid business, this divvying up by race, said
Speaker 2: John Roberts. Well, the reality is is that they're divvying
Speaker 2: up this by a political party. That's what's really happening.
Speaker 2: The political parties have been have assumed and usurped a
Speaker 2: lot of powers that they should never have. So I
Speaker 2: guess it's back to Marsha Blackburn and this is what
Speaker 2: it looks like, and this is what it's going to
Speaker 2: look like. The opposite of this is what it's going
Speaker 2: to look like in Democrat states. You think this is
Speaker 2: only going to go one way if you're caught up
Speaker 2: in this partisan nonsense. Again, the founders of this country
Speaker 2: wanted to have nothing to do with political parties, partisan clubs,
Speaker 2: and all the rest of the stuff that everybody wants
Speaker 2: to identify with. It was anathema to them. So she
Speaker 2: says she's calling for a special legislative session to eliminate
Speaker 2: all Democrat House seats in Tennessee. Well, that shouldn't be
Speaker 2: her decision and it shouldn't be the politician's decision. Again,
Speaker 2: that tells you right there, they don't want elections. Right,
Speaker 2: We're going to decide how many the other party is
Speaker 2: going to have, and you see this happening everywhere. It's
Speaker 2: happening in Texas, it's happening in Florida's happening in California
Speaker 2: on the other side, and you've got some Democrat states
Speaker 2: are doing this as well. And as a part of this,
Speaker 2: that's why I talked about the Memphis Representative Stephen Cohen.
Speaker 2: He is the only one out of the congressional delegation
Speaker 2: from Tennessee. They have eight Republicans and one Democrat. That's
Speaker 2: one Democrat too many. She says, well, I would not
Speaker 2: necessarily disagree with that. I would just disagree with her methods,
Speaker 2: which I think are really important. I think the means
Speaker 2: that you do is more important than the end. In
Speaker 2: most cases, the end has never justifies the means, and
Speaker 2: I think this is the wrong way to go about this.
Speaker 2: They want to double down now on jerry mandry, and
Speaker 2: so we're going to take a quick break and.
Speaker 4: Hold on before we do that. We've got many comments,
Speaker 4: and of course there's something very special happening today. It
Speaker 4: is my dad's birthday, and so we say happy birthday,
Speaker 4: David Night, and we have many many birthday wishes, which
Speaker 4: you're going to get to now exactly. You gotta have
Speaker 4: a little fanfare now and then North American House Hippos
Speaker 4: now monthly supporter on Rumble. Thank you very much, Hi
Speaker 4: boost says, Happy birthday David. Wally Wallrice, Happy birthday d
Speaker 4: k and he says that twice than Steichen for twenty.
Speaker 4: Happy Birthday David. Steve evs oh gosh, Happy birthday, David
Speaker 4: Kuda Bing. Happy birthday, David. I'm Marty. Thank you very
Speaker 4: much for the tip. That's very generous, he says, Happy
Speaker 4: birthday David. Have a fire extinguisher on cake standby just
Speaker 4: in case, Hi handy, Happy birthday.
Speaker 2: I actually did that. I think by turn fifty. We
Speaker 2: tried to get fifty candles on the cake. Couldn't get
Speaker 2: them all lit before. Once I burned down into the cake.
Speaker 4: You got to blow hard and blow fast.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well I'm blow hard. Yeah, I thought it could work.
Speaker 4: Be my valentine says, Happy birthday David. North American House Hippo.
Speaker 4: He says, I had, and thank you very much for
Speaker 4: that tip. He says, I had previously mentioned the robot
Speaker 4: dragons where I work in their applicability to police robot technology,
Speaker 4: but at least they couldn't fly or breathe fire. Well
Speaker 4: now they can fly the fire coming soon, I suppose.
Speaker 2: And he works down in Orlando. I'm not sure which
Speaker 2: one of the parks they're doing that at. Maybe they're
Speaker 2: doing that. Universal's got a Harry Potter thing. Maybe that's
Speaker 2: where that's happening to be. Yeah, it's going to get
Speaker 2: kind of crazy, real fast at these parks, I think
Speaker 2: as the robot technology goes. Of course we've all always
Speaker 2: had Do we still have that anymore? I still have
Speaker 2: the Olaf dying on the road. Yeah, we got this.
Speaker 2: While we're talking about robotic technology at the various parks,
Speaker 2: take a look at this as is Olof the Snowman,
Speaker 2: and they've actually created a little robotic snowman. But of
Speaker 2: course these are early days and Olof is on the
Speaker 2: bleeding edge of technology. There he is talking to people
Speaker 2: waving us stick arms and oh and his nose falls
Speaker 2: off and all the rest of this. So yeah, that's
Speaker 2: hopefully that won't happen to the flying dragons. I mentionine,
Speaker 2: they're much larger and it'd be more consequential if they
Speaker 2: crashed to the ground.
Speaker 4: Irs machine Gun, thank you very much for the tip,
Speaker 4: and he says, happy birthday, Stealth Patriot. Happy birthday David,
Speaker 4: and prayers for good health and if I tire in
Speaker 4: seventeen seventy six from Kick, Happy birthday DK mL to
Speaker 4: you and your family. Not sure what mL is. Much love,
Speaker 4: much love that makes sense, I'm.
Speaker 2: Guessing, I'm guessing. Well, thank you for that, and thank
Speaker 2: you for the prayers. And by the way, I've got
Speaker 2: this piece of paper here to remind me of We're
Speaker 2: gotten for the last couple of days to mention it
Speaker 2: on the show. But a longtime supporter of the show,
Speaker 2: Dave and am Marie. Dave is having surgery scheduled for
Speaker 2: tomorrow and I won't go into the details of it,
Speaker 2: but it is a very serious surgery and he says,
Speaker 2: by God's healing hand, I'll be coming home. And so
Speaker 2: I would just like to ask you to pray for
Speaker 2: David and for Ammory and that this would go well,
Speaker 2: that they would be at peace, and that God would
Speaker 2: give them a peace, and that God would be their healery.
Speaker 2: You know, we go to these physicians and they treat us.
Speaker 2: We need to understand that it is God that heals us.
Speaker 2: We should always look to God for that. And so
Speaker 2: that is our prayer for David, and also peace for
Speaker 2: Anne Marie, Peace for David as well as he's looking
Speaker 2: at the surgery. So sorry to hear that, but David,
Speaker 2: when you return home, let us know. Okay, let us
Speaker 2: know how that went. And I want to thank Mary
Speaker 2: ellen Moore because she is matching funds today. Mary ellen
Speaker 2: Moore is with free minds film dot com and I
Speaker 2: just want to tell you about one of the documentaries.
Speaker 2: They've got several documentaries that are there. We've got a
Speaker 2: trailer for one of them, do we, Travis, I got
Speaker 2: ready to play Shadow Ring and this is about the
Speaker 2: history of the CFR, history of false flag wars, many
Speaker 2: other things that are still happening today. Why are they
Speaker 2: happening because they're going unchecked and why are they going
Speaker 2: unchecked because a lot of people don't understand it yet.
Speaker 2: And so it's very important to have these documentaries, to
Speaker 2: pass them around and share them. And so you can
Speaker 2: go to freemindfilms dot com and you can buy the
Speaker 2: film or you can go there and you can watch
Speaker 2: it for free with commercials. And we got a trailer
Speaker 2: for that, by the way, Yeah, go ahead and play
Speaker 2: the trailer if you can.
Speaker 5: I did part of the reason we went into Iraq
Speaker 5: was the main reason we went into Iraq at the
Speaker 5: time was we thought he had weapons of mass destruction.
Speaker 5: It turns out he didn't, but he had the capacity
Speaker 5: to make weapons of masters.
Speaker 2: But talked about the human.
Speaker 5: Suffering Iraq, and I also talk to need to advance
Speaker 5: a freedom agenda.
Speaker 6: Who have any people being paid by the CIA who
Speaker 6: are contributing to the national news services APE and.
Speaker 5: UPI Well, again, I think we're getting into the kind
Speaker 5: of details Chairman that Dad prefer to handle an executive session.
Speaker 1: The event seems to be something other than what it
Speaker 1: truly is.
Speaker 7: They're playing chess.
Speaker 8: Well, we're not even playing checkers yet.
Speaker 5: Either you were with us or you were with the terrorists.
Speaker 9: You're not getting critical mass and less because if you
Speaker 9: listen to most media, a conspiracy theorists or conspiracies are
Speaker 9: all urban legends.
Speaker 10: I think that we have noticed over the years that uh,
Speaker 10: some of the events that led up to war were
Speaker 10: not accidentally.
Speaker 11: When and where Japan's strike?
Speaker 2: Could we have been lied to about everything?
Speaker 4: Is that even possible?
Speaker 7: So I hope things will fraud to begin with people
Speaker 7: get caught up in debating if MSNBC has a better
Speaker 7: perspective than Fox News or ABC NBC. These are a
Speaker 7: very narrow window of information.
Speaker 12: If you don't tell the line, if you're not official
Speaker 12: corporate media, doesn't matter how big your audience is. We're
Speaker 12: going to control the conversation. If you can be an
Speaker 12: appropriate mouthpiece for government. If you're not going to challenge
Speaker 12: the paradigm of statism, we will give you.
Speaker 4: Access, Joe.
Speaker 10: If you understand who these people are, and you understand
Speaker 10: what their mission is and how they think and what
Speaker 10: their ideology is, then most of the mysteries of the
Speaker 10: modern world, how come we're getting into this mess? Or
Speaker 10: why are we doing this? And so for they become
Speaker 10: easy to answer.
Speaker 8: And every one of those people knew was a lie,
Speaker 8: and they sacrifice the lives of sixty thousand American boys.
Speaker 10: All human authority is jurisdictional and limited.
Speaker 12: The fact is the superclass exists. That's the problem.
Speaker 10: What kind of world government will this be? It might
Speaker 10: even be worse than war.
Speaker 11: Without a massive shift in global consciousness.
Speaker 13: It's impossible.
Speaker 11: If you had a one world government, it would set
Speaker 11: up the most unrestrained tyranny in history.
Speaker 2: That's right, one world government and the most unrestrained tyranny
Speaker 2: in history. That is what we're looking at, folks, that
Speaker 2: we're right on the cusp of that. People need to
Speaker 2: understand where this is coming from. And of course, ultimately
Speaker 2: the power that is behind all this, the greatest conspiracy
Speaker 2: is Satanic and we have to understand that that is
Speaker 2: the foundational thing. So we should not be surprised when
Speaker 2: we see these the satanic child ritual abuse, the pedophiles,
Speaker 2: and all the rest of this stuff. This is what
Speaker 2: these people are. And as you look at the push
Speaker 2: for psychedelics and other things like that true pharmachea true
Speaker 2: sorcery that's out there, and you look at the reinvention,
Speaker 2: in my opinion, of the Tower of Babel, that's basically
Speaker 2: the way these people see artificial intelligence. They are going
Speaker 2: to become like God. That's the age old lie in
Speaker 2: the Garden of Eden, and that's the same lie that
Speaker 2: we saw the pride the hubris of the Tower of Babel.
Speaker 2: And you know, quite frankly, when you look at artificial intelligence,
Speaker 2: that really has provided kind of a debabbelizer, which is
Speaker 2: what Scott Adams talked about, was it's kind of Doug Adams.
Speaker 2: Doug Adams talked about in Hitchhiker's Guy in the Galaxy.
Speaker 2: You don't even need to put a fish in your ear.
Speaker 2: It just debabilizes everything. So again we're.
Speaker 4: What do you want to put a fish in your ear?
Speaker 2: Why would you want to hear what these people know
Speaker 2: this world have to say about it? But of course
Speaker 2: that's where we are right now. But where we are
Speaker 2: right now is at the point we're going to take
Speaker 2: a quick break and we will be right back folks.
Speaker 2: After this quick break.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 14: Here news now at apsradionews dot com or get the
Speaker 14: APS Radio app and never miss another story.
Speaker 4: Welcome back, folks. Sorry to cut you off, but we
Speaker 4: have more comments and tips. G Talent sixty thanks making
Speaker 4: the breath exactly. Happy birthday David from G Talent sixty.
Speaker 4: Thank you very much.
Speaker 2: Thank you.
Speaker 4: Yes oh in sixty one, thank you very much, says
Speaker 4: Happy birthday David. And Wally Walrice, thank you, he says,
Speaker 4: double up. Thank you all very much.
Speaker 2: Thank you very much. And I don't want to thank
Speaker 2: Ryan for that clock that he got us. We're thought
Speaker 2: where should we put it, and we thought, well, we
Speaker 2: don't have a background at all for Travis, and so
Speaker 2: Travis set up the video camera there and that's going
Speaker 2: to be our background in there. Thank you so much, Ryan,
Speaker 2: I really do appreciate that. For the love of the road.
Speaker 2: You'll see him various four formats that are there, But
Speaker 2: thank you so much for that. Let's talk about the war.
Speaker 2: Of course, Trump is now telling his age to prepare
Speaker 2: for an extended blockade of Iran. This is exactly the
Speaker 2: opposite of what the doctor has ordered for the help
Speaker 2: of the global economy. An extended blockade is not good
Speaker 2: for anybody. It's not even good for Trump. He's going
Speaker 2: to wind up killing the Republican Party, and so perhaps
Speaker 2: that's the purpose. The more I look at this guy,
Speaker 2: the more I think that he is a Manchurian candidate
Speaker 2: for the globalists and the Democrats. Certainly is working out
Speaker 2: that way, and so much so that Wall Street has
Speaker 2: a new Akerman acronym instead of a taco. You're not
Speaker 2: talking about nachos. And this is not your economy right
Speaker 2: here that we're saying is not going to be one
Speaker 2: that you want. Trump has instructed AIDS to prepare for
Speaker 2: an extended blockade of Iran, said US officials. Targeting Iran's
Speaker 2: coffers in a high risk bid to compel a nuclear capitulation.
Speaker 2: Tehran has long refused to do so. Well, Quite frankly,
Speaker 2: they had. They had had inspectors there, which Israel has
Speaker 2: never had inspectors look at anything that they do. They
Speaker 2: were open with the books, and US intelligence as well
Speaker 2: as international inspectors said they're not doing what they're being
Speaker 2: accused of by Netanyahu. And you also had the guy
Speaker 2: that they now assassinated had put out as a religious
Speaker 2: leader as well as a political leader. He had put
Speaker 2: out a fatwah against nuclear weapons. But when you look
Speaker 2: at it now, I think every nation on Earth, especially
Speaker 2: in the Middle East, has to come to the conclusion
Speaker 2: that the only way we can stop from being attacked
Speaker 2: by Israel or by the United States under false pretenses
Speaker 2: just to have nuclear weapons. Nobody's talking about attacking Pakistan,
Speaker 2: for example. And so when we look at this, remember
Speaker 2: we had people like Ben Shapiro mocking those of us
Speaker 2: who are saying this is a quagmire, this is a
Speaker 2: path to a global depression, a global war. He said, Oh,
Speaker 2: listen to these doom and gloomers. No, it's going to
Speaker 2: be in and out. It'll be real quick, it'll be
Speaker 2: a piece of cake, right, and said, these statements by
Speaker 2: Ben Shapiro are not going to age well. And we'll
Speaker 2: play those again for you in a little while. But
Speaker 2: tomorrow is the day, supposedly.
Speaker 4: The real question is what statements of Ben Shapiro's have aged.
Speaker 2: Well, I can't think of any. But you know, tomorrow
Speaker 2: is the magic day. Right. We have a constitution says
Speaker 2: that Congress will declare war. They've ignored that and they
Speaker 2: pass their own law, which again, you can't you know,
Speaker 2: you can't just ignore the Constitution and be a legitimate government.
Speaker 2: The government in Washington, folks, is completely illegitimate. Republicans and
Speaker 2: Democrats are usurpers. They have no authority. They swear to
Speaker 2: hold the Constitution, that immediately ignore it on everything. You
Speaker 2: even had a Speaker of the House, the squeaker that's
Speaker 2: in the House, Mike Johnson saying we can't have search warrants.
Speaker 2: Can you imagine how long that would take if we
Speaker 2: encumbered law enforcement? Yes, I can imagine encumbering law enforcement.
Speaker 2: I can imagine that's what exactly needs to be done.
Speaker 2: But the utter contempt that the Speaker of the House
Speaker 2: has for this is just jarring if you look at it,
Speaker 2: and so tomorrow. So they ignore the Constitution and the
Speaker 2: fact that Congress needs to declare war and they passed
Speaker 2: a War Powers Act. It says that the president can
Speaker 2: go to war without Congress, but he can only do
Speaker 2: so for sixty days unless they agree to it. Well,
Speaker 2: guess what day sixty is tomorrow. They're not really even
Speaker 2: talking about it, and the mainstream media is not really
Speaker 2: talking about it either. I've only seen as I look around,
Speaker 2: I only see one article that is talking about this
Speaker 2: impending deadline that is happening tomorrow. Of course, you know
Speaker 2: they're going to find some way to just rubber stamp
Speaker 2: it or to move on, or to ignore it. I mean,
Speaker 2: if they can ignore the Constitution, can't ignore their own
Speaker 2: law that they created. I guess they can. Who's going
Speaker 2: to stop him? Trump is not planning on stopping I mean,
Speaker 2: he knows tomorrow is day sixty. He's not worried about
Speaker 2: any of the stuff. He's planning to extend this blockade,
Speaker 2: this Trump embargo, the Trump embargo is going to be
Speaker 2: much worse than the OPEC embargo. I said this from
Speaker 2: day one. It involved a much bigger blockage than ever
Speaker 2: happened with Opek, and because of the war that is there,
Speaker 2: because of the constant antagonizing of Iran, and that's exactly
Speaker 2: what is happening. You know, Ron says, don't attack our
Speaker 2: oil facilities, or we will attack everybody else's well facilities.
Speaker 2: So why they do they attack Iran's oil facilities because
Speaker 2: Israel wants the entire region destroyed like Gaza so they
Speaker 2: can take it. In recent meetings, including a Monday discussion
Speaker 2: in the Situation Room, Trump opted to continue squeezing Iran's economy. Well,
Speaker 2: just understand that you're also squeezing the global economy. You're
Speaker 2: also squeezing the pocketbooks of Americans, and the Trump administration
Speaker 2: doesn't care about either one of those. If they can
Speaker 2: destroy Iran's economy, they're more than happy to destroy the
Speaker 2: global economy. They're more than happy to destroy your household budget.
Speaker 2: If they can do that, that means absolutely nothing to them.
Speaker 2: So Wall Street is looking at this and they came
Speaker 2: up with the acronym Taco. Trump always chickens out that
Speaker 2: was about the tariffs, and that was meant to assuage
Speaker 2: people's concerns that the stock market was getting rocked from
Speaker 2: one direction to the other, as Trump would put on
Speaker 2: tariffs and take them off, and put them on, and
Speaker 2: take them off, ramp them up over one hundred percent,
Speaker 2: then drop them again. It was absolute chaos. So to
Speaker 2: try to stop the chaos of his capricious, arbitrary whims,
Speaker 2: acting as a dictator, acting as a king, they said,
Speaker 2: don't worry, Taco. Trump always chickens out. Don't worry, you know,
Speaker 2: don't In other words, ignore this guy. Whatever he's telling
Speaker 2: you is a lie, and he's going to change it
Speaker 2: in a little while, so don't trade on this. But
Speaker 2: he has really royal the markets with this oil stuff.
Speaker 2: And so now they've got another one Nacho, which means
Speaker 2: not a chance that horror moves will open, right, And
Speaker 2: that's the bottom line. He's going to keep this thing
Speaker 2: blocked one way or the other. And of course Mark
Speaker 2: Levin was very proud of the fact. I know, I
Speaker 2: ain't telling him to do a blackade. So I was like, yeah, okay,
Speaker 2: let's give Mark Levin the credit he deserves. It's just
Speaker 2: like Trump bragging about the vaccine. I'm the father of
Speaker 2: the vaccine. I created that thing. It's like, okay, all
Speaker 2: those deaths are on your head then, and we look
Speaker 2: at Mark Levin the global depression, the deaths that are
Speaker 2: coming from that's all going to be on his head
Speaker 2: as well. So Bloomberg columnist Javier Blass revealed Nacho on Wednesday.
Speaker 2: He said he didn't come up with it. It was
Speaker 2: a trader who told him that's what they were talking
Speaker 2: about on Wall Street. And again, not a chance or
Speaker 2: moves opens. So he said, the shockwave has been sent
Speaker 2: through global markets. Well. Prices extended their rally on Wednesday,
Speaker 2: Brent crude climbing above one hundred and fourteen dollars a barrel,
Speaker 2: the US benchmark West Texas Intermediate surpassing one hundred and
Speaker 2: three dollars a barrel. You know, when all this again,
Speaker 2: Iran said, you're going to see oil at two hundred
Speaker 2: dollars a barrel, And now you've got some financial end
Speaker 2: lists and banks saying yeah, we could see oil at
Speaker 2: two hundred dollars a barrel. This is another thing that
Speaker 2: was poo pooed by the Zionist and the warmongers. Oh,
Speaker 2: I don't worry about that. It's not a problem. This
Speaker 2: is going to be a piece of cake.
Speaker 4: What They meant was it's not a problem for them.
Speaker 4: You know, they have an unlimited amount of money to
Speaker 4: play with. Uh, that's right, don't worry about it. We'll
Speaker 4: be fine.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 4: Well, wasn't really concerned about you in the first place, Bud.
Speaker 2: That's right. Gasoline prices have surged by forty percent in
Speaker 2: just two months because of what Trump has done. In
Speaker 2: twenty twenty five, Wall Street coined the code Taco to
Speaker 2: try to keep the market cool. But now they're looking
Speaker 2: at this and they're saying, well, this guy is completely
Speaker 2: out of his mind. Trump is threatening steep tariffs, the
Speaker 2: markets plunge, and days later he backs off in a
Speaker 2: way that prompts a rebound. That was what Taco was about. However,
Speaker 2: with the hormevez Impass, it's very different. The frustrated president
Speaker 2: has gyrated between claims that Tehran is begging for him
Speaker 2: to end his blockade, and then he switches around. He
Speaker 2: has outbursts that are threatening to have more strikes and
Speaker 2: to kill everybody in the entire civilization if they don't
Speaker 2: reopen hor moves. So what is it? You know, this
Speaker 2: is the thing about Trump. He can't get to a
Speaker 2: speech without contradicting himself. Clearly, you know we're winning, but hey,
Speaker 2: if you guys don't help us, there's going to be
Speaker 2: consequences for Nathan and all these countries that don't help us.
Speaker 2: And the same thing happens really with Pete Hegseth. He
Speaker 2: went before Congress and they ask him questions about the war.
Speaker 2: And notice how this guy and just a little two
Speaker 2: minute speech completely he tells two different contradictory lies in
Speaker 2: two minutes because he can't make up his mind which
Speaker 2: liar he's going to follow. Is he going to follow
Speaker 2: the Trump lies or is he going to follow the
Speaker 2: net and Yahoo lies? So he tells lies from both
Speaker 2: of them, and both of them are telling different stories.
Speaker 7: Nuclear facilities have been obliterated underground, they're buried, and so
Speaker 7: we know where any.
Speaker 8: Nuclear material be claiming that time we're watching second here,
Speaker 8: we had to start this war, you just said sixty
Speaker 8: days ago because the nuclear weapon was an imminent threat.
Speaker 8: Now you're saying that it was completely obliterate.
Speaker 7: It had not given up their nuclear ambitions, and they
Speaker 7: had a conventional shield of.
Speaker 8: Thousands of operation midnight and we a moment nothing of substance,
Speaker 8: and they're missing in the same place we were before.
Speaker 7: So much so their facilities are bombed and obliterated. Their
Speaker 7: their ambitions continued, and they're building a conventional shield.
Speaker 1: Let me try again.
Speaker 4: It's the North Korea strategy.
Speaker 7: You know this very well. The North Korea strategy was
Speaker 7: used conventional missiles to prevent anybody from challenging them, so.
Speaker 4: They could slow walk their way to a weapon.
Speaker 7: President Trump saw Iran at its weakest moment, took an
Speaker 7: action to ensure in a way that only the United
Speaker 7: States of America could do.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, you know what Hegseeth is doing is the
Speaker 2: George W. Bush strategy, that is to just lie about
Speaker 2: weapons of mass destruction. So first he wants to say
Speaker 2: that it is eminent we have to attack, because that's
Speaker 2: what Netanyahu has been lying about for thirty plus years.
Speaker 2: You know, any week now they're going to have a
Speaker 2: nuclear weapon, and so it's eminent and we have to
Speaker 2: attack right now. But then Trump told everybody he wiped
Speaker 2: out all of their nuclear facilities, so it can't be both.
Speaker 2: And heg Seth is going to pretend that he doesn't
Speaker 2: know that he just caught himself in a contradictory lie.
Speaker 2: But we all see it. I think he knows it too.
Speaker 2: I hate to think the guy is so incredibly stupid
Speaker 2: that he doesn't understand how the lie they made. But
Speaker 2: of course we look at ilhan Omar. She made an
Speaker 2: interesting comment about World War eleven this week.
Speaker 15: The last time the Alien Enemies Act was invoked, it
Speaker 15: was used to detain and deport German, Japanese Italian immigrants
Speaker 15: doing ward War eleven.
Speaker 13: Welcome to the Quality Leering Center, sheez a graduate, A
Speaker 13: proud graduate of the Quality Leering Center World War eleven.
Speaker 4: Doesn't it feel nice knowing these are the types of
Speaker 4: people that wield power over us?
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 4: I'm so glad ilhan Omar is in office.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it would be very frustrating to think that politics
Speaker 2: was the highest power that's out there. But we know
Speaker 2: there is a higher power, no doubt about it. Well,
Speaker 2: two hundred dollars oil, not cho could tip the world
Speaker 2: into recession, says one global bank. Of course, we don't
Speaker 2: need the word of a global bank. We already know
Speaker 2: that anybody with any common sense knows that the prospect
Speaker 2: of oil reaching two hundred dollars a barrel doesn't seem
Speaker 2: so far fetched now, given the front month of Brent
Speaker 2: oil contract was trading at over one hundred and fourteen
Speaker 2: dollars a barrel on Wednesday, up eighty eight percent so
Speaker 2: far this year. Trump did that. Trump did that for
Speaker 2: Nett Yahoo. You know, Ron said two hundred quite some
Speaker 2: time ago. Again, as I said, Ben Shapiro poopooing that
Speaker 2: Desigon is poopooing that it's going to be so easy.
Speaker 2: They said. But even in the base case, where oil
Speaker 2: prices don't reach this high, the French Bank expects a
Speaker 2: first half average of over one hundred dollars. The global
Speaker 2: economy is dangerously close to how the BMP. The French
Speaker 2: Bank defines a recession. They're forecasting three percent GDP growth.
Speaker 2: They define a recession as anything that is less than
Speaker 2: two and a half percent. So we're splitting hairs and
Speaker 2: statistics here, and depending on how you calculate it and
Speaker 2: measure it, just like the inflation rate or the unemployment rate,
Speaker 2: we have armies of bureaucrats who can spend and twist
Speaker 2: that data to give the result that they want. But
Speaker 2: we know what it looks like. The two hundred dollars
Speaker 2: scenario is joined by two other related possible causes of
Speaker 2: a recession, worsening supply chain bottlenecks and tightening monetary response
Speaker 2: policy and response to inflationary pressures. So both of these
Speaker 2: things could happen. These drivers would likely be concurrent and
Speaker 2: would reinforce each other in the event of a more
Speaker 2: prolonged conflict. One case in point is helium. Of course,
Speaker 2: the direct input into microchip productions we point out from
Speaker 2: the very beginning, but you have shortages of rubber and
Speaker 2: chemical components have already been reported in Asia so far.
Speaker 2: Some of the chip manufacturers have gone to great links
Speaker 2: to say, we're not worried about helium yet we have
Speaker 2: some supplies of that yet. However, they've already seen shortages
Speaker 2: of rubber and chemical components in Asia. The war could
Speaker 2: also affect, of course, food prices, grain prices in the
Speaker 2: northern hemisphere as they are trying to purchase fertilizer. But
Speaker 2: Trump is in full Nacho mode. Not a chance or
Speaker 2: moves opens. And that's where we are with this guy
Speaker 2: that's lied us into war yet again. How many times
Speaker 2: do they tell the same lies about weapons of mass destruction,
Speaker 2: the same lies about Iran and nuclear weapons, and you know,
Speaker 2: they're lying when they go back and they look at
Speaker 2: and we see this same type of thing happening with
Speaker 2: al Gore and the climate change people. They cherry pick
Speaker 2: their time range, you know, they pick a point that
Speaker 2: is to their advantage in the statistics so they can
Speaker 2: show the trend that they want. So they go back
Speaker 2: at a point where they had a little mini ice
Speaker 2: age and that's their start point. And so then they
Speaker 2: make the case that there is global warming until now now,
Speaker 2: since that hasn't been happening, al Gore is flipping the
Speaker 2: narrative at this point. But they did the same thing
Speaker 2: with a war agenda. You always have a trump and
Speaker 2: all these people go back forty seven years to nineteen
Speaker 2: seventy nine and say, you know, for forty seven years,
Speaker 2: look at what Iran's doing. They just, out of the
Speaker 2: clear blue sky, they attacked our embassy. Don't know why
Speaker 2: they did that at all. They don't want to go
Speaker 2: back to where our involvement with Iran began in nineteen
Speaker 2: fifty three. And so we've had seventy three years of
Speaker 2: America bringing in tyranny, a police state, a surveillan state, king,
Speaker 2: all the rest of the stuff. Overthrowing their elections, doing
Speaker 2: a coup. That's the true history, and it makes all
Speaker 2: the difference in the world. What your starting point is.
Speaker 2: Just like with the climate people, well, Trump's approval rating,
Speaker 2: whatever the starting point was, that is now sinking to
Speaker 2: new lows as Iran war is driving affordability concerns for Americans.
Speaker 2: Like I said, he doesn't care about the American economy,
Speaker 2: he doesn't care about the global economy, and perhaps he
Speaker 2: doesn't even care about the midterms. If he's going to
Speaker 2: keep down going down this path, perhaps the only thing
Speaker 2: he cares about is pleasing net Yahoo, because otherwise none
Speaker 2: of this stuff makes any sense. As John Meersheimer said,
Speaker 2: why does Israel spend so much lobbying money and buying
Speaker 2: of politicians. What's because the things that they want us
Speaker 2: to do are not in our interests. If they were
Speaker 2: in our interests, they would need to pay the politicians
Speaker 2: to do them. Politicians would be more than happy to
Speaker 2: do things that are in our interests. But if they're
Speaker 2: going to work against the interest of Americans, if they're
Speaker 2: going to work against the interest even of the global economy,
Speaker 2: they need to be paid. And that's the purpose of APEC.
Speaker 2: And the rest of these organizations. So again, you look
Speaker 2: at Trump's approval, it ought to be inversely proportional to
Speaker 2: the price of gas at the pump, and it may
Speaker 2: be working out that way. As one goes up, the
Speaker 2: price goes up, his approval should go down. I hope
Speaker 2: it does. Trump's approval rating has dipped to a new
Speaker 2: low as Iran war is driving affordability concerns for Americans,
Speaker 2: as the lowest approval rating of Trump that the Polling
Speaker 2: Partnership has found since he returned for his second time,
Speaker 2: and that specifically about their view on Trump's handling of
Speaker 2: inflation and rising prices. Only twenty one percent of the
Speaker 2: people approved. That's not a good thing. You don't want
Speaker 2: to be with the twenty percent. You want to be
Speaker 2: with the eighty percent. Maybe somebody needs to explain that math.
Speaker 2: I guess you know, he and his advisers are looking
Speaker 2: at it goes well, you know, there's a couple of
Speaker 2: different ways you can calculate percentage. Right, these are the
Speaker 2: people telling us that he did a six hundred percent
Speaker 2: reduction in prices. They're probably telling him that the twenty
Speaker 2: one percent approval rating is a good thing. Two months
Speaker 2: Since the US and Israel began launching strikes against Iran,
Speaker 2: Washington and Tehran have struggled to even get to the
Speaker 2: negotiating table. Every day, Americans are feeling the burden of
Speaker 2: the costly military campaign rights. The independent out of the
Speaker 2: UK diesel is up to five dollars and forty six
Speaker 2: cents a gallon, which can lead to increased grocery prices,
Speaker 2: shipping costs, even the costs of homes and renovations. Because
Speaker 2: the construction industry as well as the farms are very
Speaker 2: reliant on diesel fuel. Energy prices caused inflation have marched
Speaker 2: the sore, but Trump has brushed it off as fake inflation. Yeah,
Speaker 2: fake inflation. He's a fake present. Everything this guy says
Speaker 2: is a lie. Even within one speech he contradicts himself
Speaker 2: multiple times. Fifty three percent in the poll said the
Speaker 2: war in Iran has not been worth it. Trump has
Speaker 2: insisted that Iran poses an imminent threat to Americans. Again,
Speaker 2: once you're bragging about completely annihilating their nuclear weapons, and
Speaker 2: their nuclear weapons were not a threat to us. Didn't
Speaker 2: have any way to deliver that, And so now you
Speaker 2: know you've got everybody who has nuclear ambitions the global
Speaker 2: energy order is breaking down. There's an accelerating shift from
Speaker 2: oil market structured around economic efficiency toward an oil market
Speaker 2: that is shaped by politics and conflict. Is that really
Speaker 2: what we want? Yeah? I mean that's what Trump did
Speaker 2: with tariffs in general. Right, he moved from a with tariffs,
Speaker 2: He moved from an economy that was centered around economic
Speaker 2: efficiency to one that was going to be determined by
Speaker 2: politics and of course by conflict, as he threatened and
Speaker 2: went to war with everybody. Verbally and economically. Trump despises markets.
Speaker 2: He despises free markets, he despises free trade, He despises
Speaker 2: everything except his political dictates. A fractured Opek, a blockaded
Speaker 2: Persian Gulf. The Iran war is scrambling the long standing
Speaker 2: foundations of the oil market, ushering in a more fragmented,
Speaker 2: potentially more volatile energy world. The free flow of patroleum
Speaker 2: across oceans is out and resource nationalism is in. And
Speaker 2: for all the people who think this is great, you know,
Speaker 2: we're now going to be the big supplier of oil.
Speaker 2: Is that right? Well, we're still that's a good thing
Speaker 2: for the oil companies. Perhaps maybe it's a good thing
Speaker 2: for the government. It's not a good thing for the
Speaker 2: average American consumer. We're going to pay a lot more
Speaker 2: for everything while these people make the profits. But you've
Speaker 2: got warpete out there who is bragging about this.
Speaker 7: It's also worth saying this should not be America's fight alone.
Speaker 7: We barely use the Strait of Horme moves as a country.
Speaker 7: Our energy doesn't flow through there, but our prices do
Speaker 7: plenty of energy. Just look at the new Global Congo
Speaker 7: line headed to Texas, a beautiful picture. Europe and Asia
Speaker 7: have benefited from our protection for decades, but the time
Speaker 7: for free riding is over. America and the free world
Speaker 7: deserve allies who are capable, who are loyal, and you
Speaker 7: understand that being an ally is not a one way street,
Speaker 7: it's a two way street. We are not counting on Europe,
Speaker 7: but they need the Strait of Horror moves much more
Speaker 7: than we do, and might want to start doing less
Speaker 7: talking and having less fancy conferences in Europe and getting
Speaker 7: a boat.
Speaker 2: And you're getting a boat, he'll probably shoot you without
Speaker 2: warning and then circle back around and kill any survivors.
Speaker 2: This guy needs to do a little less talking, I think,
Speaker 2: because I have at least a little less boasting about
Speaker 2: all this stuff. Look what Pete Hegseth and the Trump
Speaker 2: administration and some of these MAGA cheer leaders are selling
Speaker 2: you is a petro version of the broken window fallacy. Oh,
Speaker 2: war is great because we go in and blow everything up. Now,
Speaker 2: look at how it boosts the economy to go back
Speaker 2: and rebuild these buildings that we destroyed. No, that doesn't
Speaker 2: make us richer, not at all. And this is not
Speaker 2: a good thing either. We may not be using oil
Speaker 2: that travels through the Strait of hor moves, but guess
Speaker 2: what if the people who are using it can't get it,
Speaker 2: that raises a price for all of us. We saw
Speaker 2: that with a Chevron executive when he was interviewed. He said, well,
Speaker 2: you know, it's a global market. You know, if the
Speaker 2: people in Europe show up at his door and want
Speaker 2: to pay more money for the oil that they don't have,
Speaker 2: they want to pay more for our oil so they
Speaker 2: have some that's our liquid petroleum, natural gas. Yeah, that's
Speaker 2: that's going to cause that competition is going to raise
Speaker 2: a price for Americans and for all products. So, yeah,
Speaker 2: that is a stupid way to look at the economics
Speaker 2: of this. But this is a guy who doesn't understand
Speaker 2: the broken windows policy. This is a guy who only
Speaker 2: wants to break as many windows as he can. Even
Speaker 2: the gop hawks are now alarmed over the Iran war
Speaker 2: fallout as the sixty day limit hits tomorrow, May day,
Speaker 2: may day, we'll see what happens. But they're pretty confident
Speaker 2: that they're going to ignore whatever the law is and
Speaker 2: they'll get whatever they want out of Congress.
Speaker 4: So yeah, I'm sure Trump is really sweating the fact
Speaker 4: that the Congress might not like, well, have they ever
Speaker 4: done it before? No, but you know, maybe this ton
Speaker 4: they're not going.
Speaker 2: No, There's been multiple attempts to stop this before. This
Speaker 2: always shut down, So I know they'll rubber stamp whatever
Speaker 2: he wants to do. Reports say the White House is
Speaker 2: preparing for an extended Hormuz blockade at least months longer.
Speaker 2: There now appears to be significant shift among Republicans underway,
Speaker 2: given that the nineteen seventy three War Powers Resolution requires
Speaker 2: a US president must terminate unauthorized military operations within sixty
Speaker 2: days of initiating them. Again, we don't care about the Constitution, obviously,
Speaker 2: And when they look at this, they see the average
Speaker 2: price of a gallon of gas has hit its highest
Speaker 2: level in four years. Like I said, forty percent up
Speaker 2: since he started this insanity. This is triggered talk among
Speaker 2: GOP leaders and listen to what they are saying. Here.
Speaker 2: You got people like Senator Curtis says it's a big deal.
Speaker 2: There are a number of us having discussions about what
Speaker 2: that day means and what our response should be. They
Speaker 2: don't know, right, Senator Collins, sixty days is a trigger
Speaker 2: that requires Congress to act. Don Bacon, we haven't had
Speaker 2: haven't been doing combat for the last two weeks. I
Speaker 2: think it merits discussion. But in the end, I want
Speaker 2: us to finish the job. So yeah, maybe we just
Speaker 2: deduct those those cease fire things and get another two
Speaker 2: weeks out there. Maybe we play that game. Saranta Holly says,
Speaker 2: Rubio has been pretty careful to comply with the statute.
Speaker 2: My hope is that they will notify us that they
Speaker 2: are drawing down offensive operations. That's not going to happen.
Speaker 2: They've already put that out. Senator Murkowski says, you've got
Speaker 2: to talk to us. She warned, if that doesn't happen,
Speaker 2: you may see a change in the situation in Congress.
Speaker 2: So yeah, flatter us and we'll help you to do
Speaker 2: whatever you want. Then you've got Senator Tillis who says
Speaker 2: this is going to be weeks or months away from resolution,
Speaker 2: more likely months. So why not send a very clear
Speaker 2: signal to Iran, let's authorize the war for another year.
Speaker 2: That's likely what you're going to get from these people
Speaker 2: the States.
Speaker 4: Well, it's probably going to happen anyway, so you might
Speaker 4: as well rubber stamp it, right, that's right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, let's send a message to Iran. Let's tell them
Speaker 2: we're in it forever, because you know, that's the way
Speaker 2: we win wars, isn't it We stay in Afghanistan for
Speaker 2: two years and then leave in a panic. That's the
Speaker 2: way we win wars, isn't it. High oil prices are
Speaker 2: risk for Trump's fellow Republicans ahead of the midterm congressional
Speaker 2: elections in November, said Reuters, That absolutely is the truth. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: we have airlines across Europe are saying they could some
Speaker 2: of them. Many of them are circling the drain ready
Speaker 2: to go out of business. But even the big guys
Speaker 2: are shutting down massive numbers of flights as they're looking
Speaker 2: at the fuel situation, both the cost and the availability.
Speaker 2: Airlines go bust two times a year in September and February.
Speaker 2: Airlines with weak liquidity positions will come under immense pressure.
Speaker 2: In the September timeframe, they said. German carrier Luftanza has
Speaker 2: cut twenty thousand summer flights across Europe, saying that higher
Speaker 2: fuel costs have rendered many routes unprofitable. That's right. So
Speaker 2: when we look at this, jet fuel prices have doubled.
Speaker 2: You know, we look at gasoline prices, they've gone up
Speaker 2: by forty percent. Diesel has gone up more. Jet fuel
Speaker 2: is the one that has increased the most. It has
Speaker 2: doubled one hundred percent increase. That to explain that to
Speaker 2: people the Trump administration and our age, when it doubles,
Speaker 2: that's one hundred percent increase. You can have more than
Speaker 2: one hundred percent increase, as we're going to see with
Speaker 2: many products thanks to Trump. But they're not going to
Speaker 2: see a six hundred percent decrease of anything. So again,
Speaker 2: when we look at this, they really don't care. It
Speaker 2: doesn't affect them. He's he's just concerned about his bunker. Right.
Speaker 2: This is the Hitler mentality, Right, Trump is going to
Speaker 2: be raging in that ballroom bunker, and he doesn't really
Speaker 2: care what happens to the rest of us, whether we
Speaker 2: get bombed, whether the economy tanks, it's not his concern. Really.
Speaker 4: Well, that's what DBB stands for. Build ballroom bunker, that's.
Speaker 2: Right, and then build back better after they've destroyed everything
Speaker 2: in the world. Well, we're going to take a break
Speaker 2: and when we come back, we're going to talk about
Speaker 2: some other issues in the news. And I want to
Speaker 2: get to what is happening with open ai and there
Speaker 2: are plans of global domination. We just had a trial
Speaker 2: that began between Elon Musk and Sam Altman at open
Speaker 2: ai because remember Musk was at open ai and the
Speaker 2: whole purpose, as an aim sounds was they wanted to
Speaker 2: make this open source and things like that. It was
Speaker 2: supposed to be a nonprofit. Sam Altman somehow maneuvered his
Speaker 2: way in took control of the group and turned it
Speaker 2: into a for profit thing. And so there is a
Speaker 2: lawsuit that's going on between the two of them, and
Speaker 2: it's in its early stages, so there's not really anything
Speaker 2: to report yet. It's just that Elon Musk, when he
Speaker 2: refers to Sam Altman. He calls him scam Altman. That
Speaker 2: is a spot on nickname for Sam Waltman. Everything he
Speaker 2: does is a scam. When you go back and look
Speaker 2: at the first time I ever saw this guy, he
Speaker 2: had this creepy orb that he was sending around. He
Speaker 2: had some kind of world coin thing that he was doing.
Speaker 2: If you would look into his orb, it could get
Speaker 2: a biometric reading on your retina or I think it
Speaker 2: was in your eye, but basically it would get a
Speaker 2: biometric reading of your eye and put that into his database,
Speaker 2: which he is going going to monetize, but in exchange
Speaker 2: and as an incentive, he would give you some worthless
Speaker 2: crypto in a coin that he had, a meme coin
Speaker 2: that he had created.
Speaker 4: Remember, folks, if the technomancer tells you to stare into
Speaker 4: his orb, don't do it.
Speaker 2: That's right. Isn't it interesting when you look at Palenteer
Speaker 2: and you look at scam Altman, how they constantly got
Speaker 2: to saying, you know, look into this orb, look into
Speaker 2: the palenteer, lick into my little thing here, and don't worry.
Speaker 2: We're going to take care of you. We're going to
Speaker 2: give you a little bit of a worthless meme coin
Speaker 2: for exchange, and I'm going to take that global database
Speaker 2: of billions of people that I hope to have, and
Speaker 2: I'm going to get rich off of that global database.
Speaker 2: I'll be selling your information everywhere.
Speaker 4: But before break, we have a lot of comments and
Speaker 4: we have Guard goldsmis saying happy birthday, David. You are
Speaker 4: the best. Well, thank you, thank you very much, Guard,
Speaker 4: and from there on also thank you for the tip
Speaker 4: that is generous. North American house Hippo says when Mike
Speaker 4: Waltz says, Iranian infrastructure is fair game because it was
Speaker 4: all built by their military. Remember all the dams and
Speaker 4: bridges and highways here in the USA built by the
Speaker 4: Army Corps of Engineers.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right, absolutely, Yeah, this is a thing. It's like,
Speaker 2: what makes them think that these chickens aren't going to
Speaker 2: come home to roosts in America? And the easiest thing
Speaker 2: in the world would be for somebody to come across
Speaker 2: the border and do a terrorist attack against our infrastructure.
Speaker 2: We've seen this going on, and I made that point
Speaker 2: about Iran from the very beginning because that's what we
Speaker 2: see continuously in the Russian and Ukraine situation, attacking each
Speaker 2: other's infrastructure. You know, Iran's not stupid, and what is
Speaker 2: stupid is our foreign policy to initiate war. It's evil
Speaker 2: as well.
Speaker 4: Go ahead, yes, and we have Spencer DeLong getted a
Speaker 4: sub on kick Thank you very much. Spencer DeLong. Atomic
Speaker 4: citizen has gifted five subs. Thank you very much, Atomic Citizen.
Speaker 4: So if you're on kickcheck, you might have gotten a
Speaker 4: free sub. North American House Hippo says, says David's comparison
Speaker 4: to Malania Trump to Green Acres Lisa Douglas is scarier
Speaker 4: than you think. It's the only a matter of time
Speaker 4: before Milania shares her favorite hot water soup recipes, and
Speaker 4: the Syrian girl says, if we don't get rid of
Speaker 4: the Trump regime and fix the Iran problem soon, a
Speaker 4: lot of people are going to die in the cold
Speaker 4: next winter.
Speaker 2: That's right, you know when you look at this, and
Speaker 2: that's I said, we don't have any good choices, right,
Speaker 2: you know, there's a I can only think of one
Speaker 2: person who is usually right on the issues, and that's
Speaker 2: Thomas Massey, and they're after him as hard as they
Speaker 2: can go. But he can't change everything, and there's not
Speaker 2: any any change or hope that's going to be coming
Speaker 2: out of one Washington one way or the other. And
Speaker 2: so we have to try to stop what the Democrats
Speaker 2: are doing at the local and state level. We have
Speaker 2: to try to stop what the Trump administration is doing
Speaker 2: at the international level by stopping Republicans. I just I've
Speaker 2: never voted for a Democrat in my life, and I'm
Speaker 2: not about to do that. I just can't bring myself
Speaker 2: to vote for evil. But I look at this and
Speaker 2: it's like keeping my fingers crossed that Trump gets some
Speaker 2: peach is all I can say.
Speaker 4: The Democrats probably killed any chance of that with their
Speaker 4: last attempt. Yeah, Palm Beach, Pete, Spooky gifted five subs
Speaker 4: on Rumble Isn't that the character they say is Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 2: That's right, that's the guy that looks like Jeffrey Epstein,
Speaker 2: and they saw that's Jeffrey.
Speaker 4: Currently in the Rumble chat. We've got Epstein Island, We've
Speaker 4: got Palm Beach Pete, We've got a cast of characters.
Speaker 4: Junk Silver, Thank you so much. That's very generous, is David.
Speaker 4: I've been hearing for a while that you were just
Speaker 4: weeks from having a birthday how I wish I heeded
Speaker 4: those warnings.
Speaker 2: There we go. Yeah, it's a nuclear one as well.
Speaker 2: Tell me this morning. You don't look at day over seventy,
Speaker 2: I think old, Thank you, I feel like a day
Speaker 2: over eighty. Actually, we're going to take a quick break
Speaker 2: and we'll be right back.
Speaker 16: Unlike most revolutions, whether people rise against the real economic oppression,
Speaker 16: in our case, here in Boston, we are fighting for
Speaker 16: purely an abstract principle. It is, however, not nearly so
Speaker 16: abstract as a young gentleman supposes. The issue involved here
Speaker 16: is one of monopoly. Today the British government will monopolize
Speaker 16: the sale of tea in our country.
Speaker 1: Tomorrow it will be something else, liberty. It's your move.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 4: If you like the Eagles on, it doesn't that way.
Speaker 14: The cars and Huey Lewis in the news, they say
Speaker 14: the You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio,
Speaker 14: download our app or listen now at APS radio dot com.
Speaker 2: Let's talk a little bit about the other side of
Speaker 2: the economy, the side of the economy that you can
Speaker 2: actually do something about, and that is to try to
Speaker 2: exit as much as you can their system of fiat currencies.
Speaker 2: We've got Powell's final Federal Open Market Committee meeting sees
Speaker 2: most descents in thirty four years as the Fed Reserve
Speaker 2: keeps interest rates unchanged. Now this is coming from zero hedge,
Speaker 2: and of course everybody always focuses so much on the
Speaker 2: interest rates, and yet the reality is that what the
Speaker 2: Federal Reserve is doing, are they going to have an
Speaker 2: easy interest rate policy? Well, take a look at what
Speaker 2: they're doing with the quantitative easing, and typically nobody looks
Speaker 2: at that, and so they can increase the money supply
Speaker 2: and they are doing it and it really has had
Speaker 2: a huge uptick. They're going and this is the way
Speaker 2: they're doing it. Instead of doing it with interest rates,
Speaker 2: they're doing it with quantitative easing. So they pointed out,
Speaker 2: they said gold has been clubbed like a baby seal
Speaker 2: in the last couple of weeks while stocks and oil
Speaker 2: have surged, with stocks ignoring the peril of oil. And
Speaker 2: again the borrow phrase from Alan Greenspan irrational exuberance. I
Speaker 2: think he was the one who said that that we
Speaker 2: see in the stock market, it absolutely is irrational. Saxo
Speaker 2: Bank said, summarize this very succinctly. They said, structural drivers
Speaker 2: that have driven gold in the last two years have
Speaker 2: remained in place, and they have actually strengthened. And we
Speaker 2: say this all the time, you know, we look at gold. Yes,
Speaker 2: it's doubled in price in the last couple of years,
Speaker 2: and things that have doubled it in price are all
Speaker 2: still there. None of those things have changed. The fundamentals
Speaker 2: have not changed. As a matter of fact, those fundamentals
Speaker 2: that were driving gold have actually strengthened. And so we're
Speaker 2: seeing here is a market reaction that I think is
Speaker 2: detached from reality, just like I think we see the
Speaker 2: comments from Trump moving the markets, and of course you
Speaker 2: got people whoever it is. When he's making these comments,
Speaker 2: somebody is placing bets on polymarkets and the when people
Speaker 2: figure out when he contradicts it himself just a little
Speaker 2: while after that, and the market goes in the opposite direction.
Speaker 2: Somebody's making a lot of money off of that. But
Speaker 2: you and I aren't going to make money by trying
Speaker 2: to time the markets. We have to look at what
Speaker 2: the long term trends are and what the fundamentals are,
Speaker 2: and those things have not changed, they have only strengthened.
Speaker 2: During the last couple of years, FED rate change expectations
Speaker 2: has swung violently from a full rate cut to a
Speaker 2: full rate hike and fallen back to a no change
Speaker 2: at all. And so the Fed doesn't need to cut
Speaker 2: rates today, says zero edge for monetary policy to get easier,
Speaker 2: and they don't even mention quantitative easing. What they're talking
Speaker 2: about is the fact that inflation expectations arising so much
Speaker 2: that real rates have fallen to the lowest since November
Speaker 2: and are close to turning negative. And so when you
Speaker 2: look at this, you know, one of the things that
Speaker 2: happens when you look at the Federal Reserve's ability to
Speaker 2: affect the market, when they artificially lower the interest rates,
Speaker 2: that helps the federal government, helps Trump because that takes
Speaker 2: down the amount that they have to pay on the
Speaker 2: forty trillion dollars of debt that they have, but it
Speaker 2: doesn't really help us when we buy houses or credit
Speaker 2: cards or other things on that, especially houses, because people
Speaker 2: are looking the short term rates can be set by Fiat,
Speaker 2: by the Federal Reserve, but the long term rates are
Speaker 2: still set by the marketplace. So you've got to get
Speaker 2: a private bank or an investor who's going to loan
Speaker 2: you money for a thirty year period of time. They
Speaker 2: have to look at what they think inflation is going
Speaker 2: to be over that period of time, and if the
Speaker 2: Federal Reserve is lowering rates and creating inflation. That's why
Speaker 2: we have seen the Federal Reserve lower rates and we
Speaker 2: see home mortgages stay the same or go up because
Speaker 2: the market determines that those policies are going to be inflationary.
Speaker 2: But they don't look at the quantitative easing that is
Speaker 2: happening there. Meanwhile, you got a Senate Republican saying the
Speaker 2: quiet part out loud. He says, Drome Powell ought to
Speaker 2: just leave the Fed and cash in. He hasn't cashed
Speaker 2: in yet. He's got a net worth of over seventy
Speaker 2: five million dollars. I would say that's cashing in, but
Speaker 2: he says, yeah, you just leave the FED and he
Speaker 2: can go work in the private sector of whatever.
Speaker 4: Who knows, it's crazy that by our standards of corruption
Speaker 4: that you know, Drome Powell is nothing at Yoh well,
Speaker 4: he hasn't even begun to loot.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. He gets some serious money. Now, he's
Speaker 2: only got seventy five million dollars.
Speaker 4: Well, whatt a popper?
Speaker 2: Again? When you look at Trump coming after him, it
Speaker 2: was just a political persecution that he was doing. It
Speaker 2: was putting pressure on him to get him to lower
Speaker 2: the interest rates. You think Trump's going to get the
Speaker 2: new FED share to lower interest rates. You think he's
Speaker 2: going to be able to get the Federal Reserve in
Speaker 2: general to do that. He's always been able to do
Speaker 2: that in the past. When Powell would not lower the
Speaker 2: interest rates, he came after him for prosecution. And where
Speaker 2: did he turn to. He turned to Jeanine Perrault, the
Speaker 2: Fox News analysts, just like heg Zeth. And so she
Speaker 2: starts an investigation of him, and you know over this
Speaker 2: remodeling of the Federal Reserve, and yeah, it is scandalss.
Speaker 2: I'm sure there's something there. They're going to spend two
Speaker 2: billion dollars remodeling a building out in the world. Could
Speaker 2: that even be the case? Yet? Tom Tillis said I'm
Speaker 2: not going to move to approve the new FED chair
Speaker 2: until they stopped this investigation of Powell because he saw
Speaker 2: it as political warfare, as lawfair against him. And Powell
Speaker 2: said the same thing. He said, I'm not going to
Speaker 2: leave the Federal Reserve unless you stop this investigation. And
Speaker 2: so on Friday, Jannine Piro showed that this was just
Speaker 2: a political investigation. She ended it on Friday, So that
Speaker 2: clears away now for Powell to leave and for the
Speaker 2: new guy to come in. And of course Powell would
Speaker 2: Powell would not be the Fed chair, but he could
Speaker 2: stay on the board and be a thorn in Trump's side.
Speaker 2: That typically what happens is they usually leave after they're
Speaker 2: no longer the chairman, but he had indicated he might
Speaker 2: stick around. So in announcing the conclusion of her investigation
Speaker 2: last week, Pierro noted that she had asked the Federal
Speaker 2: Inspector General to investigate the project, which was subject to
Speaker 2: cost overruns due to increased material and labor costs, among
Speaker 2: other reasons, according to the Central Bank. So again, you know,
Speaker 2: try to walk this thing back. You know, she was
Speaker 2: just doing his bidding and coming charging people with crimes
Speaker 2: just because Trump didn't like them. We see this over
Speaker 2: and over again. The closing of the probe then opened
Speaker 2: the door for Senator Tom tell Us to back the
Speaker 2: nomination of Kevin Warsh. Tillis had previously said he could
Speaker 2: not vote to move Worsh's nomination in the Banking Committee
Speaker 2: to the full Senate until the investigation had ended. So
Speaker 2: there we go the Trump regime. Yet again we see
Speaker 2: all though, nothing but a bunch of thugs, gangsters and
Speaker 2: Fox News commentators.
Speaker 4: Hard to say which one of those is worse.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Meanwhile, we have in Fort Knox an article from
Speaker 2: Mises dot org asking about the gold in Fort Knox.
Speaker 2: You know, we had this situation with France and they said, well,
Speaker 2: we sold our goal that was being held in the
Speaker 2: US alts because we wanted to get the We wanted
Speaker 2: to get it according to European standards. A lot of
Speaker 2: people said, well, I think that's kind of phony, because
Speaker 2: gold is gold. Well, it turns out that according to
Speaker 2: their own records, they believe that the gold that is
Speaker 2: in Fort Knox is not up to the quality of
Speaker 2: zero point nine nine nine fine gold or whatever, and
Speaker 2: that has now become the standard internationally for the gold
Speaker 2: coins that you get and all the rest of these things.
Speaker 2: That is a standard. But because they had confiscated gold,
Speaker 2: it really kind of goes back to the history of
Speaker 2: the Federal Reserve and FDR confiscating gold. It's all part
Speaker 2: of this corruption and a corrupt government actually corrupted the
Speaker 2: quality of the gold if it's even there. And Fort Knox,
Speaker 2: and of course that's the other part of this. There's
Speaker 2: been no audits about any of this stuff, and by
Speaker 2: their own admission, only about seventeen percent of it is
Speaker 2: of the quality and purity that is something that is
Speaker 2: used internationally now, so there's an international standard of purity.
Speaker 2: This falls far short of it because they confiscated a
Speaker 2: lot of gold from Americans, melted it down, put it
Speaker 2: in their vaults, and even if it is still there,
Speaker 2: it is low quality. So the French Central Bank.
Speaker 4: Where gold is so low quality it's only fit to
Speaker 4: be turned into sneakers. So don't worry, guys, I'm sure
Speaker 4: the next round of Trump sneakers will be hitting the
Speaker 4: shelves soon.
Speaker 2: Well, they can use it for the ballroom or for
Speaker 2: some more statue.
Speaker 4: You can play all the toilets in the ballroom gold, that'll.
Speaker 2: Be right, that's right. Well, you know, you never know
Speaker 2: how many statues Trump is going to need to have
Speaker 2: of himself, and so that might be the way that
Speaker 2: they use this stuff. America's gold is valued at forty
Speaker 2: two dollars per ounce, by statute, you know, it's more
Speaker 2: than one hundred times that in reality by the marketplace.
Speaker 2: According to the London Bullion Market Association, gold bars must
Speaker 2: contain three hundred and fifty to four hundred and thirty
Speaker 2: fine Troy ounces and have a minimum fire a point
Speaker 2: of nine to nine five parts per thousand to be
Speaker 2: acceptable for international settlement. And the good delivery standards across
Speaker 2: the globe have been transitioning, however, to nine to nine
Speaker 2: purity you have. Herman Kine would love that it's all
Speaker 2: about the nines. Based on documents released during twenty eleven
Speaker 2: House Committee Financial Services Hearing, that we find that only
Speaker 2: around seventeen percent of the gold held by the US
Speaker 2: government in Fort Knox meets modern day purity standards. Again,
Speaker 2: sixty four percent of it is now the standard is
Speaker 2: nine five and most of them are doing nine nine nine.
Speaker 2: But sixty four percent of what they have in Fort Knox,
Speaker 2: they say is between eight nine nine and nine oh one,
Speaker 2: and only seventeen percent meets that. But then they planted out,
Speaker 2: they said, keep in mind, were operating on guesswork here
Speaker 2: because the US government's gold holdings have not been audited
Speaker 2: since at least the nineteen seventies. In nineteen seventy four,
Speaker 2: the government put together a publicity stunt in the name
Speaker 2: of an audit. The US Treasury opened only one of
Speaker 2: its fifteen Fort Knox Vault compartments. They opened it to
Speaker 2: politicians and reporters to view the gold and to confirm
Speaker 2: it's there. See, we got some goal, now go away.
Speaker 4: It's a lot that you'd ask about those other faults.
Speaker 2: That's been called an audit, And it was kind of
Speaker 2: like a Heraldo Rivera at al Capone's vault. And know
Speaker 2: that that was a big hype that was before your time, Travis.
Speaker 4: I know the story.
Speaker 2: Yeah you do. Yeah, I guess it's become a meme
Speaker 2: now with everybody. It was so funny. There's this big thing.
Speaker 2: We found a vault that belonged to al Capone, who
Speaker 2: knows what's in it? And they hype that thing for
Speaker 2: weeks and then they have the big reveal on live
Speaker 2: TV and guess what's in it? Nothing? That's what's going
Speaker 2: to happen.
Speaker 4: The question is how anyone thought there would be something.
Speaker 4: Surely he had companions, you know, that worked for him
Speaker 4: or something that knew the vault was there, right someone
Speaker 4: in the government got to his assets and snuck off
Speaker 4: with them.
Speaker 2: At least the irs got it right. So none of
Speaker 2: the bars that were looked at, you know, they just
Speaker 2: opened the things. Look, I see there's gold. It looks
Speaker 2: like gold, doesn't it. None of the bars that passed
Speaker 2: around have ever been matched to a serial number, None
Speaker 2: of them have been sayed, none of them have been
Speaker 2: tested for purity, and they haven't even verified how many
Speaker 2: they've got in their holdings. Following the nineteen seventy four
Speaker 2: publicity stunt, the US Treasury says that conducted a multi
Speaker 2: year process of opening and inventorying vault compartments and fixing
Speaker 2: new tamper evident seals to the doors of each compartment
Speaker 2: upon completion. However, these so called audits failed to meet
Speaker 2: the basic transparency or accounting standards. Some reports have gone missing.
Speaker 2: There's no record of comprehensive assaying and weighing or transactional
Speaker 2: history that is available to the public. Furthermore, there is
Speaker 2: evidence that seals on vault compartments have been broken over
Speaker 2: the years, bars have been moved for unknown reasons, seals
Speaker 2: have been reaffixed without fresh auditing. So maybe that's what
Speaker 2: he meant by time to cash in and check out.
Speaker 2: Just stop by the vault on your way and grab
Speaker 2: some of this stuff. I know it's not up to
Speaker 2: the international standards, but it'll do in a pent right.
Speaker 4: Just step on in, take a few bars on your
Speaker 4: way out of the treasury. I suppose you know, don't.
Speaker 2: You remember at the very beginning of the Trump regime
Speaker 2: when you had Trump and Musk were floating the stuff
Speaker 2: around and saying, yeah, we're going to go audit Fort Knox.
Speaker 2: They just play people. It's a game everything they say.
Speaker 2: So have the US end up holding so much of this?
Speaker 2: As they point out, you know, the unconstitutional confiscation by FDR.
Speaker 2: Once they got this gold, they just melted it down.
Speaker 2: And back in that day, what was traveling around was
Speaker 2: not high purity, so generally the coins that they were
Speaker 2: getting were about ninety percent pure. Private banks, along with
Speaker 2: the Federal Reserve, held a large number of coins because
Speaker 2: the Federal Reserve notes were redeemable for gold. So the
Speaker 2: government just melted them down, put them into bars, and
Speaker 2: they're supposedly sitting in the Fort Knox vaults, but we
Speaker 2: don't even know that.
Speaker 4: What happens if you walk up to the Federal Reserve
Speaker 4: and try to redeem your dollars for gold. Now, can
Speaker 4: you be like a can you show up and just
Speaker 4: like I'd like to trade this in please?
Speaker 2: Yeah, Well, well they'll give it to you. Maybe they
Speaker 2: give you the discount of the forty four dollars per ounce.
Speaker 2: I'd like to buy the gold at forty four dollars
Speaker 2: for ounce. Maybe that's something they only offer for employees
Speaker 2: of the Federal Reserve. You get a fed discount.
Speaker 4: You sell out enough of your countrymen, you can get
Speaker 4: a huge discount on gold.
Speaker 2: And that's what they mean by the discount, right Well.
Speaker 2: Mesa's editor Ryan mcmagon says the US Gold Reserve is
Speaker 2: a legacy of theft and lies. Point out the gold
Speaker 2: Reserve was never intended to be a static, untouchable horde
Speaker 2: of the US government. Matter of fact, they were just
Speaker 2: supposed They were not supposed to print anything either. And
Speaker 2: so when you look at it, this is the government
Speaker 2: that is so corrupt. They managed to not only create
Speaker 2: a worthless fiat currency, but they manage to even corrupt
Speaker 2: the gold that they hold. That's how they corrupt everything
Speaker 2: they touch. I guess it's kind of the opposite of
Speaker 2: the Midas touch. And so again you can get real
Speaker 2: gold and you can hold it yourself, and you can
Speaker 2: do that at David Knight dot Gold. They'll take you
Speaker 2: to Tony Ardeman's Wise Wolf. Tony's not joining us today.
Speaker 2: He is traveling to and from a conference that he
Speaker 2: is going to, but he'll be with us next week.
Speaker 2: And just remember, you can do dollar cost averaging with
Speaker 2: wise Wolf, the wolf Pack that they have. This's there.
Speaker 2: You can do dollar cost averaging. And right now things
Speaker 2: have calmed down, but that was a very important thing.
Speaker 2: You know, to do that over a period of years.
Speaker 2: It's a savings program. You can set this aside, don't
Speaker 2: depend on the government's hoard, have your own, stack it yourself,
Speaker 2: and you can do that. You go David Knight Dye Goal,
Speaker 2: so he knows that you're coming through us, and it'll
Speaker 2: take you right there to wolf Pack and you can
Speaker 2: sign up for the to Wise Wolf, I should say,
Speaker 2: and you can sign up for wolf Pack if you
Speaker 2: would like to. So let's take a quick break if
Speaker 2: you can go over the comments.
Speaker 4: We have comments, Yes we have. Cole three sixty says
Speaker 4: happy birthday, DK funny how Info Wars is closing on
Speaker 4: DK's birthday.
Speaker 2: Well at the last minute, guess what they pull that out. So, yeah,
Speaker 2: fake news always about this stuff that's happening there. But yeah,
Speaker 2: you look at it, and I don't know what these
Speaker 2: people think they're going to do with that. I don't
Speaker 2: see how that's going to be something that can be
Speaker 2: monotime at all. And it's not a lot of money either.
Speaker 2: I mean, they're looking at I think it's eighty something
Speaker 2: thousand dollars a month to rent, to pay rent to
Speaker 2: have the access to the website. But you know, it's
Speaker 2: going to be millions of dollars. But there's nowhere close
Speaker 2: to getting this one point four billion. You know, maybe
Speaker 2: that's what Alex raised, but they're not going to pay that.
Speaker 2: They haven't paid them a cent. As far as I
Speaker 2: could tell, not a cent has gone to anybody on
Speaker 2: this lawsuit. But Alex has used that large theoretical judgment.
Speaker 2: He choose that to raise a great deal of money.
Speaker 2: And who knows where that nine million dollars single transaction
Speaker 2: from bitcoin they talked about in the trull. Who knows
Speaker 2: where that came from? I don't know, But anyway, don't
Speaker 2: know what's going to happen with them.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I'm Marty says take heart DK, I'm several days
Speaker 4: over eighty. I feel like seventy nine. That's great peasident
Speaker 4: Avante seventeen to seventy six says Ronald Lauder has served
Speaker 4: as President the World Jewish Congress since two thousand and seven.
Speaker 4: At his WJC perch Ronald Louder has called for the
Speaker 4: criminalization of speech under the guise of calling speech with
Speaker 4: which he disagrees anti Semitism.
Speaker 2: Well, that is the standard approach that we see. And
Speaker 2: we've got a guy who was a US senator who's
Speaker 2: talking about this Komedy stuff. I'm going to get to
Speaker 2: that after the break. And what he's saying is, you know,
Speaker 2: there's hate speech. We've got some things even worse than that.
Speaker 2: There's danger speech. He's actually trying to create some new
Speaker 2: category of evil speech in order to come after COMI.
Speaker 2: The reality is, folks, that there is no speech, no
Speaker 2: speech from anybody about anything, that is as dangerous as censorship.
Speaker 2: We should make a T shirt out of that. No,
Speaker 2: there is no dangerous speech. There's no speech that is
Speaker 2: as dangerous as censorship is. That's the bottom line. We're
Speaker 2: going to talk about that when we come back.
Speaker 4: We have a Syrian girl says, problem with impeachment is
Speaker 4: who is waiting in the wings to take over. I
Speaker 4: really don't see any help coming to us until Christ
Speaker 4: comes to rule from the throne of his father.
Speaker 2: That's right, that's right, that's what our trust is in,
Speaker 2: and that's why we don't despair about this stuff. But
Speaker 2: we can do what we can do, and that is again,
Speaker 2: with the right people. And it's not easy to get
Speaker 2: it done. I'm not saying that it is, and it's
Speaker 2: impossible in some jurisdictions, but if you've got the right
Speaker 2: people in place at the local and state level, you
Speaker 2: can have people who are going to stand in the
Speaker 2: gap and nullify some of this tyranny that is coming
Speaker 2: from Washington. The only good news is, of course, it'll
Speaker 2: be really difficult for us economically when this Ponzi scheme
Speaker 2: called the federal government and the Federal Reserve collapses. But
Speaker 2: if and when it does, that would break their power
Speaker 2: to bribe governments to do the wrong thing. They are
Speaker 2: not issuing orders in defiance of the Tenth Amendment. Really
Speaker 2: what they're doing is they're bribing. This is what we
Speaker 2: saw throughout the lockdown. They're bribing state and local governments
Speaker 2: to do their bidding, just like they do for schools,
Speaker 2: and offering them a bribe, and then once they get
Speaker 2: hooked to it, they use it as blackmail. If you
Speaker 2: stop doing what you did to get the money, we're
Speaker 2: going to pull that money away. And people have gotten
Speaker 2: used to it at that point they don't think they
Speaker 2: can live without it. That's the way they control people.
Speaker 4: Yes, and we have atomic citizen eight sixty five says
Speaker 4: my father bought his first home for forty seven thousand
Speaker 4: dollars with a fourteen point seven eight percent interest rate
Speaker 4: on a two dollars and seventy five an hour union
Speaker 4: pay wage. Those days are gone, folks.
Speaker 2: Yeah. The problem is all these numbers change so radically.
Speaker 2: But when you start to look at the amount of
Speaker 2: time that you work, you know for your mortgage or
Speaker 2: these other things, we can break it down into the
Speaker 2: cost of your labor that goes into it. We're getting
Speaker 2: very poor based on government policies that are there. We're
Speaker 2: going to take a quick break, and I just don't
Speaker 2: remind everybody that. Mary Ellen Moore at Freemindfilms dot Com
Speaker 2: it graciously offered to match donations today because we're getting
Speaker 2: at the end of the month and we started the
Speaker 2: show at about seventy five percent of the gas gauge,
Speaker 2: and so she was very kind to offer to do that.
Speaker 2: And just want to remind people that they have a
Speaker 2: several different documentaries that you can see at freemindfilms dot
Speaker 2: com and we had a trailer for what was it
Speaker 2: called Shadow Shadow Ring, Shadow Ring, Thank You, and an
Speaker 2: excellent video. Of course, you can buy them there or
Speaker 2: you can watch them for free with commercials, and they're
Speaker 2: a very important and very important tool to educate people.
Speaker 2: I think it's important for us to keep our ear
Speaker 2: to the ground and understand what's going on on a
Speaker 2: day to day basis, but we have to understand the
Speaker 2: long term context of all these things, and that's what
Speaker 2: Shadow Ring really lays out there. And she's got a
Speaker 2: lot of great people in that documentary. She Edward Griffin
Speaker 2: is there, you got Gerald Salinti, you got Chuck Baldwin.
Speaker 2: These people understand what the long term perspective is. And
Speaker 2: we're going to take a look of a long term
Speaker 2: perspective as well when we come back. We're going to
Speaker 2: take a look at what's going on with Open AI.
Speaker 2: We'll be right back, folks.
Speaker 4: Real quickly. I just want to say thank you to
Speaker 4: DG eight. He says, David, happy birthday, and God bless
Speaker 4: you and your family. Let's all pray this country repents
Speaker 4: and accepts Jesus Christ as Lord and savior.
Speaker 2: Yes.
Speaker 4: Yes, And also an update from Jason Barker. Tony's traveling,
Speaker 4: but Jason and Ashley will be hosting Tony's show right
Speaker 4: after this. Oh so it'll still be going.
Speaker 2: Okay, great, great, So right after this show, and that is.
Speaker 4: On America Unplugged, on Rumble, on Rumble as well as
Speaker 4: on X I think as well, all right, we're gonna
Speaker 4: take a quick break.
Speaker 2: We'll be right back, folks.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 14: Here news now at apsradionews dot com or get the
Speaker 14: APS Radio app and never miss another story.
Speaker 2: Well, there was an interesting back and forth between CBS's
Speaker 2: Major Garrett interviewing Attorney General Todd Blanche who just filed
Speaker 2: these charges against James Commy, and Major Garrett pointed out
Speaker 2: to him, he said, if you couldn't say that eighty
Speaker 2: six is a death threat, he goes, are you investigating
Speaker 2: Jack the Soviet because he had tweeted out before coming
Speaker 2: did he had tweeted out eighty six forty six forty
Speaker 2: six being a reference to Biden. Now, why is that
Speaker 2: not a crime? Why are you not investigating that? You see,
Speaker 2: this is the reality that the MAGA people, and again
Speaker 2: Todd Blanche just ignores others. It's not at all the
Speaker 2: same thing. It's exactly the same thing. It's exactly the
Speaker 2: same thing. And these cheerleaders like Jack pisobiet I remember
Speaker 2: when Trump was criticizing Canada and he was selling the
Speaker 2: lie that all this fentanyl was coming through Canada. Everybody
Speaker 2: knew that was a lie. But Jack Pisobiat goes up
Speaker 2: to the American Canadian border, this quiet little town and
Speaker 2: he goes, look at this. There's no guards, there's no
Speaker 2: guard dogs, there's no fences, there's nothing here. And it's like, yeah,
Speaker 2: you want to turn this place into a police state.
Speaker 2: That's what your rhetoric is trying to do. And that's
Speaker 2: what this double standard is doing. There's no you know,
Speaker 2: there's no absolute standard here. Yet again, this is a
Speaker 2: double standard. If it's my party, you can do whatever
Speaker 2: you want. If you're with the other guys, we're going
Speaker 2: to punish you. The Democrats are bad enough along those lines,
Speaker 2: and we saw that happening for the last years. Rather
Speaker 2: than changing that, rather than trying to move to reform things,
Speaker 2: Trump has doubled down on this. So anyway, he points
Speaker 2: out Japisobia put out the eighty six forty six, and
Speaker 2: he said, and he didn't take it down. Come he
Speaker 2: took it down a bottom mine. As I pointed out yesterday,
Speaker 2: if you go to all the online dictionaries, slang dictionaries,
Speaker 2: urban dictionaries, and all the rest of the stuff Merriam
Speaker 2: Webster as well, they all say eighty six means to
Speaker 2: get rid of something, to take it off the menu.
Speaker 2: It goes back to the restaurants the early twentieth century.
Speaker 2: Walter Winchell talked about it. And it doesn't mean to
Speaker 2: kill somebody, doesn't imply violence. What it means it's getting
Speaker 2: rid of and we need to get rid of Trump.
Speaker 2: And we are free to say that, or just tell
Speaker 2: everybody that we live in a police state. Just go
Speaker 2: ahead and make the statement, say the quiet part out loud.
Speaker 2: We see it happening. There's no question about it. So
Speaker 2: again he said. But his response was, well, we did
Speaker 2: long investigation. We looked into this for a very very
Speaker 2: long time. So it's like, so, what did you find
Speaker 2: that changed the definition of eighty six? Did you investigate
Speaker 2: any dictionaries? No? No, And so was anybody besides christineom
Speaker 2: stupid enough to say that this was a death threat,
Speaker 2: just like she was stupid enough to accuse people of
Speaker 2: things that they everybody could see they didn't do. And
Speaker 2: what was happening in Minnesota. She and Trump were the
Speaker 2: only ones who were saying stuff like this. She and
Speaker 2: Trump are the only ones who were pushing that out there.
Speaker 2: But as I said before, we got a House Republican
Speaker 2: Dan Muser from Pennsylvania. He says, there's something that we
Speaker 2: call dangerous speech. Well, I think our government when it
Speaker 2: starts drawing lines, when it uses even the term hate speech,
Speaker 2: I think that's dangerous. But he says, no, no, no,
Speaker 2: this is worse than hate speech. He says, he criticized
Speaker 2: James Comey. He said, you have to understand that there's
Speaker 2: something called dangerous speak. I can't find that in the dictionary.
Speaker 2: I can't find that in the Constitution either. I don't
Speaker 2: think there's any speech that is dangerous. I think the
Speaker 2: great danger is censorship. He says, it's worse than hate speech. Well,
Speaker 2: all of these things are subjective, aren't they. And that's
Speaker 2: the problem with hate crimes. They're totally subjective. And we
Speaker 2: can see how they've been used to push a political
Speaker 2: agenda that are to be categorically rejected. And yet you've
Speaker 2: got Republicans. You would expect something like this coming from
Speaker 2: a Democrat. Democrats have gone down this route for a
Speaker 2: very long time. Now the Republicans are doing the same thing,
Speaker 2: becoming the Democrats, weaponizing government against speech, a new category
Speaker 2: of subjective tyranny and censorship. He said he knew exactly
Speaker 2: what that meant, said Trump, A child knows what it means. Well, chump,
Speaker 2: Donald Chump doesn't have the intellect of a child. He
Speaker 2: uses the vocabulary of an eight year old. When you
Speaker 2: look at it. He doesn't understand why this is. He
Speaker 2: and Christine home So again charges that he knowingly and
Speaker 2: wilfully threatened to take the life of the president of
Speaker 2: the United States. That is the indictment. But Trump knowingly
Speaker 2: and wilfully lies about everything. And I had them a
Speaker 2: listener who sent an email. I meant to bring it
Speaker 2: with me and I printed out, but I forgot to
Speaker 2: do it. But he pointed out he said, David frequently
Speaker 2: says I shall not kill, he goes, but actually it
Speaker 2: means shall not murder, right, And I thought that it
Speaker 2: was implied I should be explicit about that. So let
Speaker 2: me clarify that. You know, when we talk about a
Speaker 2: justified war, it is justified to kill in self defense.
Speaker 2: I've said that many times when I talk about it.
Speaker 2: But murder is something that is totally unjustified, an act
Speaker 2: of aggression and the ending of a life, and killing
Speaker 2: is something that God has delegated to government to do.
Speaker 2: They do not bear the sword in vain. I support
Speaker 2: and principle capital punishment, but in practice I don't trust
Speaker 2: our government to do a fair trial, and so under
Speaker 2: some very rare circumstances, I guess if there's a lot
Speaker 2: of witnesses a preponderance of evidence, I would support a
Speaker 2: death penalty, because I'm not opposed to it in principle.
Speaker 2: But that is a situation of the government killing when
Speaker 2: somebody else has murdered, and so there is a distinction
Speaker 2: of that. But I thought that was implied with my
Speaker 2: broader discussion about when a war is justified and when
Speaker 2: it is not. But I'll just clarify that there, that's
Speaker 2: what I meant by it. Pam Bondi meanwhile, is hit
Speaker 2: with contempt charges after illegally defying the Epstein subpoena. And
Speaker 2: so again, will anyone who talks about Trump's long, long
Speaker 2: history of public debauchery with Jeffrey Epstein? Will we now
Speaker 2: be guilty of dangerous speech because if people don't like Trump,
Speaker 2: they might do something right. Well, it is what it is.
Speaker 2: Deal with it. You've got a dangerous president who is
Speaker 2: setting dangerous precedents, and we have the right and the
Speaker 2: duty to speak out about that. So again, Bondi illegally
Speaker 2: defied our committee, skipped her deposition, and has refused to cooperate.
Speaker 2: Regardless of her job title, her testimony and her cooperation
Speaker 2: are crucial. The survivors of Epstein's abuse deserve and the
Speaker 2: American people deserve the truth. Again, Trump is going to
Speaker 2: move heaven and earth to go after his enemies. People
Speaker 2: he doesn't like, people who in may cases unjustly came
Speaker 2: after him. He's not going to push reform, but he
Speaker 2: wants to get even and he's going to come after
Speaker 2: James Comy, but he's going to protect the Epstein elite
Speaker 2: because he's one of them. Oversight Democrats are taking the
Speaker 2: lead on holding Bondy in contempt because Chairman Comer is
Speaker 2: trying to run out the clock and we refuse to
Speaker 2: let this administration stop our investigation. But in reality they
Speaker 2: don't have the power to do anything. That really resides
Speaker 2: in the Department of Justice. So Trump's Department of Justice
Speaker 2: has argued that Bondi doesn't have to testify because she's
Speaker 2: no longer the Attorney General talked to us Bannon about
Speaker 2: that right. He thought that because at one point in
Speaker 2: time he was in the Trump administration, he could invoke
Speaker 2: executive privilege. No, you can't. That doesn't mean anything she
Speaker 2: The question is what does she know? And the question
Speaker 2: is what did she do? Those are things that follow
Speaker 2: her whether she is in government or not. As I
Speaker 2: said before, we got al Gore, who is flipping yet again.
Speaker 2: He's saying we're looking at a possible new Ice age.
Speaker 2: Al Gore warned a Hollywood audience, and again he's referring
Speaker 2: to one of their fictional films that showed an ice
Speaker 2: age and so on the basis of that, and on
Speaker 2: the basis of a tabloid newspaper article, he is now
Speaker 2: pushing a different kind of fear. He's saying that the
Speaker 2: Gulf Stream might collapse within the next twenty five years,
Speaker 2: leading to an abrupt and devastating new ice age.
Speaker 4: Did he just pull up the Day after Tomorrow and
Speaker 4: show it to people, like, look, this is what's going
Speaker 4: to happen.
Speaker 2: Let me see what the movie was here. The movie was, Yeah,
Speaker 2: the Day after Tomorrow. That's it. You got it. You've
Speaker 2: seen that garbage.
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, it's a fairly entertaining movie. But it is
Speaker 4: literally all about you know, oh, global warming actually causes
Speaker 4: everything to get cool because it melts the polar ice caps.
Speaker 4: They're by cooling the oceans, causing the Gulf Stream to collapse,
Speaker 4: and that causes the superstorm which freezes everything.
Speaker 2: Basically, yeah, right, well, you know the first eight years
Speaker 2: or so of the climate McGuff and we're all about
Speaker 2: a new ice age. And what they were selling was
Speaker 2: depopulation and control. Population control in both senses of the word.
Speaker 2: We're going to dictate what you can and cannot do,
Speaker 2: as we've seen so many times, right, and we also
Speaker 2: want to reduce the number of people that are out there.
Speaker 2: So they went with that for about the first eight years.
Speaker 2: Then all of a sudden, just like that, they flipped
Speaker 2: the lie. They flipped the mcguffein, and now it's not
Speaker 2: a new ice age, but now it's global warming. They
Speaker 2: went with that for decades of doomsday predictions, and when
Speaker 2: all those were failing, they came back and said, you're
Speaker 2: going to call it global warming anymore. We'll call it
Speaker 2: climate change. We don't know what's going happened, and we're
Speaker 2: not going to make these kinds of predictions anymore. But
Speaker 2: you should be afraid that it's going to change somehow,
Speaker 2: and if it does change, it's going to be your fault.
Speaker 2: So we got to control what you are doing. That
Speaker 2: is our our entree there. And of course al Gore
Speaker 2: is old school. He's still he feels like he's going
Speaker 2: to make predictions, and he's been doing this kind of thing.
Speaker 2: This goes back to two thousand and nine, as a
Speaker 2: matter of fact, where he was telling this group of
Speaker 2: lies December fourteenth, to.
Speaker 17: Capture the astonishment that the experts in the science of
Speaker 17: ice felt when they saw this minimum in two thousand
Speaker 17: and five, which meant that the amount of ice that
Speaker 17: had melted, it's been roughly the size of the continental
Speaker 17: the United States, minus an area roughly the size of Arizona.
Speaker 17: Nothing against Arizona, but the amount that melted in two
Speaker 17: thousand and five was equivalent to an area covering everything
Speaker 17: east of the Mississippi River in the United States. Then
Speaker 17: when the real shock to the scientists came was in
Speaker 17: two thousand and seven, some of the models suggest to
Speaker 17: doctor Masilowski that there is a seventy five percent chance
Speaker 17: that the entire North Polar ice cap during summer, during
Speaker 17: some of the summer months could be completely ice free
Speaker 17: within the next five to seven years. Bob used a
Speaker 17: figure of twenty thirty.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, the bottom line is that professor that he
Speaker 2: mentioned by name there Maslowski. So afterwards, I don't know
Speaker 2: where he came up with that number of seventy five percent.
Speaker 2: It just made this up. If it was Trump would
Speaker 2: have said two p right, that's what he usually resorts
Speaker 2: to when he's lying, because it sounds precise. Seventy five
Speaker 2: percent sounds like a ballpark figure, right, That's what al
Speaker 2: Gore used. And so we see these guys constantly science science,
Speaker 2: science is all just like Fauci, isn't it? And I
Speaker 2: don't know what this really is. I mean, I'm just
Speaker 2: a politician out here. But the scientists say, and based
Speaker 2: on what these scientists say, and the scientists are saying,
Speaker 2: I don't know you got that stuff from. In reality,
Speaker 2: the kind of ice melt that al Gore warns about
Speaker 2: is projected to take centuries or even thousands of years,
Speaker 2: causing millimeters per year of ocean rise, which would be
Speaker 2: barely noticeable, certainly not catastrophic. It's interesting though, that Gore
Speaker 2: has jumped on the idea of a new ice age.
Speaker 2: I think his superpower is putting people to sleep. He
Speaker 2: fell asleep when I looked at the original clip. I
Speaker 2: cut that minute out of it, but it was difficult
Speaker 2: to get through. He is one of the most boring
Speaker 2: speakers I've ever seen anywhere, so I guess people look
Speaker 2: at it it's like, well, he's mentioning scientists out here,
Speaker 2: and this is really boring, and he throws out a
Speaker 2: couple of numbers, so that must be real. I guess
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 4: That's the plan. They just get you lulled into the
Speaker 4: sort of dreamlike state, and you just start accepting everything.
Speaker 4: Al Gore has to say say, oh, okay, that's right,
Speaker 4: it's sure, yeah, al Gore or whatever you say.
Speaker 2: Well, it's This article from zero Hedge points out global
Speaker 2: warming science relies on rigged data window the temperature history
Speaker 2: that only goes back to the eighteen eighties, and again
Speaker 2: they're going to disregard all evidence of longer periods of time.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, the truth is the Earth
Speaker 2: has been far warmer, rarely cooler than the temperatures are today.
Speaker 2: And as I said before, it's the same thing they
Speaker 2: do when they push their wars. I remember this climate
Speaker 2: mcguffin is a war against us, certainly is. But when
Speaker 2: they push a war against Iran. While they do, they
Speaker 2: cherry pick a date that they go back to that
Speaker 2: is tied to a particular event to create a fake trend.
Speaker 2: The Climate change Grift is a creation of the Club
Speaker 2: of Rome from the nineteen seventies to the nineteen nineties.
Speaker 2: It was a UN associated group of prominent elites. Again,
Speaker 2: he was speaking at the uncc C, the UN Conference
Speaker 2: on Climate Change stuff. I think it's what it's called.
Speaker 2: So you a agenda, you know, just like the war
Speaker 2: on drugs and so many other things that vex our
Speaker 2: lives to fabricate a rationale for global governance and for depopulation.
Speaker 2: And so they can keep changing this mcguffin. And as
Speaker 2: I said, the real clue is that whether they're talking
Speaker 2: about a climate mcguffin or a COVID mcguffin, they can
Speaker 2: constantly adjust that narrative. Whatever the mcguffin is to scare people,
Speaker 2: they constantly change it. But notice how the solution remains
Speaker 2: the same. Whether it's going to be global warming or
Speaker 2: global cooling, or whether it's going to be a pandemic.
Speaker 2: The solution is to get you locked down under lock
Speaker 2: and key, to take things away from you, to enslave you.
Speaker 2: That's always the clue that it's a mcguffin. So al
Speaker 2: Gore has long been a member of the Club of Rome.
Speaker 2: According to the group's own documentation, he often cites the
Speaker 2: Club of Rome's nineteen seventy two report called The Limits
Speaker 2: of Growth as a basis for his ideological beliefs, and
Speaker 2: they are ideological, they are not scientific. Well as ridiculous
Speaker 2: as al Gore was, here's an even more ridiculous story
Speaker 2: I saw this, I just had to talk about it.
Speaker 2: This is a man who dug up his sister's body
Speaker 2: and took it to the bank. It's the exact opposite
Speaker 2: of a weekend at Bernie's going around with a dead
Speaker 2: body to try to convince me when he's still alive.
Speaker 2: He was trying to get money out of the bank
Speaker 2: and the bank was standing on a paperwork issue. He said,
Speaker 2: we're not going to give you any that money unless
Speaker 2: you give us a death certificate. He's like from this
Speaker 2: area of India where they have a you know, a
Speaker 2: lot of very poor areas. They have difficulty getting birth certificates,
Speaker 2: death certificates and things like that. So he got frustrated
Speaker 2: and he decided he'd do his own habeas corpus. I
Speaker 2: guess where is the body? And so he went in
Speaker 2: carrying the body into the bank, and they said as
Speaker 2: he came in, the TV network's broadcast footage of him
Speaker 2: carrying what appeared to be a corpse partially wrapped in plastic,
Speaker 2: with skeletal legs visible and slung over his shoulder. This
Speaker 2: created a highly distressing situation at the premises, said the
Speaker 2: bank officer. He said the claim will be settled once
Speaker 2: the death certificate is submitted. They are not going to
Speaker 2: change that. Bureaucracy wants the paperwork. Nothing else matters to them.
Speaker 2: Registration of birth and death is very difficult to get
Speaker 2: in some areas that are poor in India. Well, we're
Speaker 2: going to take a break and before we run out
Speaker 2: of time, I want to come back and talk about
Speaker 2: what is going on with open AI and their agenda.
Speaker 2: But we want to thank Mary Ellen Moore at freemindfilms
Speaker 2: dot com who is matching funds today, and just remind
Speaker 2: you of the documentaries that you can find there. One
Speaker 2: of them shadow Ring, we were talking about earlier, and
Speaker 2: it shows these long term moves just like al Gore
Speaker 2: long term moves to establish global governance, to push us
Speaker 2: into false flag wars and the rest of the stuff.
Speaker 2: You can see these films for free with commercials at
Speaker 2: freeminds freemindfilms dot com or you can purchase them there
Speaker 2: and pass them around to other people to help to
Speaker 2: educate people that are there. So I want to thank
Speaker 2: her for matching the funds today, and.
Speaker 4: We also have comments. We have gold and Green. Thank
Speaker 4: you very much for the tip. He says, have your birthday, David,
Speaker 4: Hope you're taking plenty of time to celebrate and relax
Speaker 4: with the family. A wonderful spring season to you, God
Speaker 4: bless well.
Speaker 2: Thank you. We have a pre recorded a couple of
Speaker 2: interviews for Tom. I think you're really going to enjoy them.
Speaker 2: Very very interesting. One guy who was an ATF agent
Speaker 2: of all things, and we had a lot of broad
Speaker 2: ranging discussion about prohibition because they get into cigarette tobacco
Speaker 2: prohibition as well as gun prohibition. There was some stuff
Speaker 2: in there about civil asset forfeiture, you know what I
Speaker 2: think about it. So I didn't challenge him and just
Speaker 2: let him put out his viewpoint of and I think
Speaker 2: it's very interesting. But he worked for them for a
Speaker 2: couple of decades, had a very interesting undercover investigation. In
Speaker 2: other words, he's not part of the regulatory people that
Speaker 2: go around and look at the books of gun stores
Speaker 2: and shut him down or measuring the length of your barrel.
Speaker 2: But he was out there working with people to try
Speaker 2: to infiltrate these gangs like the Gambino crime family was
Speaker 2: one of them. And the informat that he was using
Speaker 2: got betrayed by the government. Surprise surprize, and he wrote
Speaker 2: a book about that betrayal, and he also wrote another
Speaker 2: book about all the different businesses that they created storefronts
Speaker 2: in various communities so they could entrap people over there.
Speaker 2: That is most likely going to be turned into a series,
Speaker 2: a TV series, and so the talks are still ongoing,
Speaker 2: and you know how these things work out sometimes, but
Speaker 2: it would be an excellent series. It's an excellent book.
Speaker 2: It's a very interesting discussion. Of course, we also have
Speaker 2: Sheriff Mac and Sheriff Mac. We broaden that out from
Speaker 2: local control importance of sheriffs and judges. We've got an
Speaker 2: interesting story about a conflict between a sheriff and a judge.
Speaker 2: But we also talked about the jfkssassination and light of
Speaker 2: the security issues at the White House Correspondence dinner and
Speaker 2: so a couple of good interviews coming up tomorrow and
Speaker 2: join us tomorrow as well. Anything else you want to
Speaker 2: say before we go to break.
Speaker 4: Yes for Love of the Road is gifted ten subs
Speaker 4: on Rumble and thirteen subs on Kicks, So thank you
Speaker 4: very much for love of their own.
Speaker 2: Thank you very much. Yes, And of course you can
Speaker 2: see the donation that he gave us and probably need
Speaker 2: to get that a little bit closer to you because
Speaker 2: it's hard to read it in the background there. But
Speaker 2: it's an eliminated sign with a David Night Show and
Speaker 2: that was a gift for the love of the road too.
Speaker 2: We really do appreciate it. Yeah, we do.
Speaker 4: And Jason Barker, thank you very much, very generous says.
Speaker 4: Have your birthday, David. And thank you Mary Ellen Moore
Speaker 4: for matching the tips today. Yes, thank you. And of
Speaker 4: course we have we have Homestead Products dot shop wishing
Speaker 4: you a happy birthday. Well, and of course I want
Speaker 4: to let everyone know that they do have a sale
Speaker 4: going on right now for the hydration Electrolyte drink mix
Speaker 4: organic sie Berry flavor.
Speaker 2: Kai. I think is why you pronounce that?
Speaker 4: I've heard it both ways. Yeah, I choose the one
Speaker 4: that's more ridiculous, most likely to be true.
Speaker 2: That's a good way to put it. Yeah, well, anyway,
Speaker 2: that's a really how were you pronounce it? That is
Speaker 2: a very nutritious berry. Yes, and I didn't know that
Speaker 2: it was also a hydration electrolyte. That's really good to know,
Speaker 2: because you know, you go out and you get gatorade
Speaker 2: or some of these other things they're loaded the all
Speaker 2: kinds of other stuff that you don't really want to have.
Speaker 2: So that's a great thing to have. Yes, love the
Speaker 2: natural products that he's got there.
Speaker 4: They have really good products. Go check this out. If
Speaker 4: you're it's not just enough to be drinking water, and
Speaker 4: it's not just enough to be getting electrolytes. You want
Speaker 4: electrolytes that have potassium in it as well, because potassium
Speaker 4: actually helps the water get into your cells. You can
Speaker 4: drink a ton of water, but without those two things,
Speaker 4: you're not gonna be hydrated on the cellular level. So
Speaker 4: go check it out.
Speaker 2: Yes, all right, we're gonna take a quick break and
Speaker 2: we'll be right back to talk about open AI.
Speaker 3: Here is a song I old you might onto a
Speaker 3: here in your you'll own nothing.
Speaker 1: And be happy.
Speaker 3: I got no cash, I ain't got no car, not
Speaker 3: to empty four booster shots in your own nothing.
Speaker 2: Be happy.
Speaker 3: You can't even buy shape inns a store because of
Speaker 3: your low social credit score. Oh nothing, Be happy you
Speaker 3: would owe nothing and be happy. Be happy at bugs.
Speaker 14: Whether you're feeling like the booze or bluegrass, aps radio
Speaker 14: has you covered. Check out a wide variety of channels
Speaker 14: on our app. At apsradio dot com.
Speaker 2: All right, welcome back. We have open AI and not
Speaker 2: only involved in a lawsuit right now with Elon Musk,
Speaker 2: but scam Altman and his company put out several documents
Speaker 2: talking about their principles and how wonderful superintelligence that they're
Speaker 2: designing is going to be and how it is going
Speaker 2: to serve mankind. I've heard that before, haven't we industrial
Speaker 2: policy for the intelligence age? Ideas on keeping people first?
Speaker 2: You know, when to look at that, the intelligence age?
Speaker 2: What is that? What does that bring to mind? You know,
Speaker 2: I look at that and I think of surveillance, right Like,
Speaker 2: the intelligence community is going to be watching everything that
Speaker 2: you do. That's really I think the hallmark of open AI.
Speaker 2: And of course, there is no mention at all anywhere
Speaker 2: throughout this. He talks about all kinds of ways that well,
Speaker 2: you know, it's going to take everybody's jobs, but we'll
Speaker 2: set up universal basic income, we'll create sovereign wealth funds,
Speaker 2: and we'll do all this kind of stuff. Don't worry,
Speaker 2: you know, you'll be happy. You'll own nothing, but you'll
Speaker 2: be happy. Nowhere in any of this is there any
Speaker 2: sense or discussion of how this stuff will be abused.
Speaker 2: Nothing at all all about individual liberty. They start out
Speaker 2: their document by saying, in just a few years, AI
Speaker 2: has progressed from systems capable of narrow tasks to models
Speaker 2: that can perform general tasks people used to need hours
Speaker 2: to do. Now we are beginning a transition towards super intelligence.
Speaker 2: He defines that as AI systems capable of out performing
Speaker 2: the smartest humans even when they are assisted by AI.
Speaker 2: So even with AI, we're not going to be as
Speaker 2: smart as AI. Think about that, the illogical statement that
Speaker 2: we have there, He said, the promise of superintelligence is extraordinary.
Speaker 2: Just as electricity transformed homes, the combustion engine remade mobility,
Speaker 2: and mass production lowered the cost of essential goods, superintelligence
Speaker 2: will speed up scientific and medical breakthroughs, significantly increased productivity,
Speaker 2: lower costs for families by making essential goods cheaper, and
Speaker 2: open the way for entirely new forms of work, creativity,
Speaker 2: and entrepreneurship. Nothing at all about the opportunity for the
Speaker 2: police to set up a surveillan estate, for the government
Speaker 2: to audit every aspect of your life constantly in the
Speaker 2: smallest details. Yeah, nothing at all about that. We all
Speaker 2: saw that starting to be rolled out with doge when
Speaker 2: that came through. And so he throws out, here's just
Speaker 2: three different areas that he breaks us down to, which
Speaker 2: kind of reminded me of something. See if it reminds
Speaker 2: you of anything. We're going to share prosperity broadly, mitigate risks,
Speaker 2: and democratize access and agency. I looked at this and
Speaker 2: I thought, you know, that kind of sounds to me
Speaker 2: like when Satan tempted Christ. What do you do? He says,
Speaker 2: First of all, he looks at prosperity broadly. He says,
Speaker 2: command these stones be made bred right. And that's basically
Speaker 2: what he's telling you. That the AI is going to
Speaker 2: turn the stones to bread. But they always appeal to
Speaker 2: your love of money and prosperity, don't they. The next
Speaker 2: thing is mitigate risk.
Speaker 15: You know.
Speaker 2: The next thing that Satan said to him is throw
Speaker 2: yourself down. God will send his angels to bear you up. Right. Well, that's,
Speaker 2: you know, mitigate risks. Don't worry about it. I just
Speaker 2: go fast and break things and AI will clean up
Speaker 2: the mess for us. And then the final one is
Speaker 2: democratic access and agency. You know, you too can live
Speaker 2: like a king, You too can have slaves. We're going
Speaker 2: to provide you with robotic slaves and artificial intelligence to
Speaker 2: do your work for you. You'll live like a king. You'll
Speaker 2: be like a king, which was the third thing that
Speaker 2: Satan tempted Christ with. You know, this kind of kingship
Speaker 2: power that is there. So they're constantly laying these types
Speaker 2: of things out. They said they we need to make
Speaker 2: sure that data centers don't raise the electric rates for individuals,
Speaker 2: and we need to have some common sense AI regulation.
Speaker 2: You know, whenever you hear somebody talk about common sense regulation,
Speaker 2: what they're saying is I want to do something radically prohibitive.
Speaker 2: I want to give the government all new powers. It's
Speaker 2: just common sense regulation, right. You hear that about gun control,
Speaker 2: you hear that about everything as a catchphrase. And so
Speaker 2: you know, we're going to have some common sense AI regulation.
Speaker 2: We're going to make sure that the not only are
Speaker 2: they not going to raise your prices for electricity, these
Speaker 2: data centers, but they're actually going to be creating jobs
Speaker 2: and paying taxes. Well, we've seen one particular case I
Speaker 2: didn't go into it in detail, seventy seven million dollars
Speaker 2: at a data center that was going to create one job, Yeah,
Speaker 2: one job in normal times, he said, the case we're
Speaker 2: letting markets work on their own is very strong. But
Speaker 2: see these are not normal times. You know, I love
Speaker 2: the free market, but this particular case, we just can't
Speaker 2: rely on the free market. So let's bring in some
Speaker 2: industrial policy. That's the title of the paper here. Well,
Speaker 2: industrial policy. What he means by that is government picking
Speaker 2: winners and losers. We've seen that before, haven't we. Crony capitalism, corruption, fascism,
Speaker 2: that's what the government picking winners and losers looks like.
Speaker 2: But he said, no, industrial policy can play an important
Speaker 2: role when market forces alone are not sufficient. We just
Speaker 2: can't trust the marketplace. You know, this is a guy
Speaker 2: who famously went to Congress in another CEO of an
Speaker 2: AI company, and they said, this is just so important.
Speaker 2: It's going to be the lifeblood of your empire. Right,
Speaker 2: You're going to have to have this because if you
Speaker 2: don't and the other guys do, they are going to
Speaker 2: be the ones who are going to control everything. So
Speaker 2: you're going to have It's very important, and it's so
Speaker 2: important that you've got to subsidize it, give us money.
Speaker 2: But it's also so dangerous that only people like us
Speaker 2: can be entrusted with it. That is always the message.
Speaker 2: You know, we can't trust the free market, we can't
Speaker 2: trust our competitors, but you can trust us. As a
Speaker 2: matter of fact, you have to give us the people's money.
Speaker 2: Thank you so much for joining us. Thank you so
Speaker 2: much for your support. I have a good day, and
Speaker 2: thank you for all the well wishes.
Speaker 4: Yes, thank you all very much, and do not obey.
Speaker 4: Thank you for that. He says, well, you know the
Speaker 4: world has become a big casino and that was Professor Trump.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and he knows how to bankrupt casinos, and he's
Speaker 2: going to bankrupt the entire casino world that he's created.
Speaker 4: And thank you again everyone for all the well wishes.
Speaker 4: I know there's so many that I missed, but there
Speaker 4: were just too many for me to get them all
Speaker 4: and write them all down. So thank you all, and
Speaker 4: once more, happy birthday. You all have a wonderful rest
Speaker 4: of your day.
Speaker 2: Well that ain't more fanfair, Thank you very much. The
Speaker 2: common Man, they created common Core and dumb down our children.
Speaker 2: They created common Past track and control us. They're Commons
Speaker 2: project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the
Speaker 2: communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary.
Speaker 2: But each of us has worth and dignity created in
Speaker 2: the image of God. That is what we have in common.
Speaker 2: That is what they want to take away. Their most
Speaker 2: powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
Speaker 2: everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's
Speaker 2: time to turn that around and expose what they want
Speaker 2: to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find
Speaker 2: at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank
Speaker 2: you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please
Speaker 2: keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com