WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.360 --> 00:00:02.439
<v Speaker 1>And it seems like there's a decent amount of executive

2
00:00:02.520 --> 00:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>orders on deck. Now the question is, well, this would

3
00:00:05.080 --> 00:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>be a day one executive order, a week one executive order,

4
00:00:08.199 --> 00:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>or sometime in the first hundred days. It seems like

5
00:00:10.720 --> 00:00:14.039
<v Speaker 1>acre in initial reports, we'll probably get next week. And

6
00:00:14.080 --> 00:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>if I had to imagine what these executive order would be,

7
00:00:16.519 --> 00:00:19.079
<v Speaker 1>I imagine SAT one twenty one is right on the

8
00:00:19.120 --> 00:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>top of the list. As well as kind of creating

9
00:00:21.039 --> 00:00:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the actual crypto council.

10
00:00:28.079 --> 00:00:30.199
<v Speaker 2>This episode is brought to you by bidgo, which is

11
00:00:30.239 --> 00:00:32.679
<v Speaker 2>a top tier crypto custodian that has been in the

12
00:00:32.719 --> 00:00:36.039
<v Speaker 2>industry since twenty thirteen. It's headed up by Mike Belshew,

13
00:00:36.079 --> 00:00:38.759
<v Speaker 2>who's a Web one point zero two point zero legend.

14
00:00:39.280 --> 00:00:43.439
<v Speaker 2>Bitco provides incredible services. In addition to custody, they allow

15
00:00:43.479 --> 00:00:46.560
<v Speaker 2>you to manage your tokens, get all types of liquidity,

16
00:00:46.600 --> 00:00:49.600
<v Speaker 2>and much more. And some of the companies that use

17
00:00:49.640 --> 00:00:54.119
<v Speaker 2>bitgo include Bitstamp, Exchange Suite, the Token Project, Pantera Capital

18
00:00:54.159 --> 00:00:57.520
<v Speaker 2>that's Dan moorehead, as well as twenty one Shares which

19
00:00:57.640 --> 00:01:01.640
<v Speaker 2>issues bitcoin and ethereum ets. Some of the great services

20
00:01:01.640 --> 00:01:05.840
<v Speaker 2>that bidgo provides includes wallet services, which is secure trusted

21
00:01:05.879 --> 00:01:09.719
<v Speaker 2>scalable wallet solutions Prime Services, which allows you to get

22
00:01:09.760 --> 00:01:13.239
<v Speaker 2>seamless access to liquidity and capital. It also allows you

23
00:01:13.319 --> 00:01:16.439
<v Speaker 2>to list, manage and grow your ecosystem. And they have

24
00:01:16.680 --> 00:01:19.120
<v Speaker 2>what's called the Go network, which is a secure, real

25
00:01:19.200 --> 00:01:23.239
<v Speaker 2>time global settlement. Recently, Bitco launched a retail platform that

26
00:01:23.280 --> 00:01:26.159
<v Speaker 2>allows you to trade stake and of course custody or

27
00:01:26.359 --> 00:01:29.400
<v Speaker 2>crypto assets. And this is a great solution because it

28
00:01:29.599 --> 00:01:33.239
<v Speaker 2>provides you with top tier cryptosecurity and securities of course

29
00:01:33.239 --> 00:01:37.280
<v Speaker 2>a big factor in investing in crypto and Bitco's offering

30
00:01:37.640 --> 00:01:41.640
<v Speaker 2>an incredible incentive as they launch this platform where you

31
00:01:41.640 --> 00:01:44.640
<v Speaker 2>can get a chance to win bitcoin. They're giving away

32
00:01:44.879 --> 00:01:47.359
<v Speaker 2>at least one bitcoin every quarter, So if you sign

33
00:01:47.480 --> 00:01:49.599
<v Speaker 2>up and have funds on the platform through the last

34
00:01:49.640 --> 00:01:52.959
<v Speaker 2>day of each quarter starting December thirty first, twenty twenty four,

35
00:01:53.319 --> 00:01:56.359
<v Speaker 2>you can be eligible to win some free bitcoin here.

36
00:01:56.439 --> 00:01:59.079
<v Speaker 2>So if you'd like to learn more about bidgo, go

37
00:01:59.159 --> 00:02:01.719
<v Speaker 2>to bidgo dot com. Link will be in the description.

38
00:02:02.040 --> 00:02:05.359
<v Speaker 2>Welcome into the Thinking Crypto podcast. You're home for cryptocurrency

39
00:02:05.400 --> 00:02:08.000
<v Speaker 2>news and interviews. I'm your host, Tony Edward and my

40
00:02:08.120 --> 00:02:11.599
<v Speaker 2>guest today is Ron Hammond, Director of Government relations at

41
00:02:11.599 --> 00:02:14.159
<v Speaker 2>the Blockchain Association. Ron, great to see you.

42
00:02:14.159 --> 00:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Happy New Year, Happy new Year, Tony. Always great to

43
00:02:16.840 --> 00:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>be chatting. So got a lot of dive into so

44
00:02:18.919 --> 00:02:19.719
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to it.

45
00:02:20.120 --> 00:02:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Ron, I saw your post yesterday recapping what's going

46
00:02:24.039 --> 00:02:26.280
<v Speaker 2>to happen this week or what you expect for crypto

47
00:02:26.759 --> 00:02:29.840
<v Speaker 2>and boy, there's so much going on, Ron, how about

48
00:02:29.879 --> 00:02:33.759
<v Speaker 2>we start about the new Digital Assets Subcommittee in the Senate.

49
00:02:33.840 --> 00:02:36.879
<v Speaker 1>This is huge, it's massive, and this is kind of

50
00:02:36.879 --> 00:02:38.759
<v Speaker 1>the precursor to what we saw in the House two

51
00:02:38.840 --> 00:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>years ago where they formed their Digital asset subcommittees and

52
00:02:41.159 --> 00:02:43.319
<v Speaker 1>that became kind of the basin where a lot of

53
00:02:43.360 --> 00:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the legislation that became Fit twenty one stable coins formed.

54
00:02:46.280 --> 00:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>But we've never seen that in the Senate. And Tim

55
00:02:48.840 --> 00:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Scott establishing the Senate Banking Committee on a Digital Aid

56
00:02:52.159 --> 00:02:55.759
<v Speaker 1>subcommittee is a major major milestone. And even better, it's

57
00:02:55.800 --> 00:02:58.759
<v Speaker 1>a really good lineup it folks we have on that subcommittee,

58
00:02:58.800 --> 00:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>especially on the Republican side. The so we have Centered

59
00:03:01.319 --> 00:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Lummits is chairing it right now, and then we have

60
00:03:03.879 --> 00:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of good other folks like Bill Haggerty for example,

61
00:03:06.360 --> 00:03:10.759
<v Speaker 1>Tom Hillis, Bernie Morino and several others. So really looking

62
00:03:10.759 --> 00:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>forward to what's going to come out of that subcommittee.

63
00:03:12.800 --> 00:03:14.639
<v Speaker 1>The hearings are going to get happening, as well as

64
00:03:14.680 --> 00:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the legislation that likely would be going through that committee

65
00:03:17.639 --> 00:03:18.479
<v Speaker 1>hopefully pretty soon.

66
00:03:19.319 --> 00:03:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

67
00:03:19.599 --> 00:03:24.039
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, And some big champions of crypto in that subcommittee,

68
00:03:24.199 --> 00:03:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Senator Lumbus, you mentioned Haggerty, and I saw even Tim

69
00:03:27.400 --> 00:03:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Scott this morning release a statement about his priorities for

70
00:03:30.120 --> 00:03:32.520
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and nineteenth Congress. They want to get some

71
00:03:32.560 --> 00:03:35.719
<v Speaker 2>sort of framework around digital assets through. So are you

72
00:03:35.800 --> 00:03:39.599
<v Speaker 2>anticipating this subcommittee will help get some sort of bill

73
00:03:39.680 --> 00:03:40.639
<v Speaker 2>through the Sendate this year?

74
00:03:41.479 --> 00:03:41.879
<v Speaker 3>Correct?

75
00:03:41.879 --> 00:03:44.319
<v Speaker 1>And just for a little history lesson for those who

76
00:03:44.360 --> 00:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>may not be following this as much. You know, we've

77
00:03:46.520 --> 00:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of issues with the Senate in the past,

78
00:03:48.439 --> 00:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and now, mind you was usually under Democrat control. But

79
00:03:51.039 --> 00:03:53.319
<v Speaker 1>even any bill that moved out of the House, for

80
00:03:53.360 --> 00:03:55.639
<v Speaker 1>the most part, that was pro crypto, it ended up

81
00:03:55.719 --> 00:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>dying usually in the Senate, or there was enough pressure

82
00:03:58.479 --> 00:04:01.879
<v Speaker 1>in political you know, I guess I see in gateways

83
00:04:01.960 --> 00:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>at the Senate that the House just decided not to

84
00:04:04.039 --> 00:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>go forward at all. So having that barrier gone is huge,

85
00:04:08.000 --> 00:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think a lot of the legislation that usually

86
00:04:10.520 --> 00:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>forms in the House, we're going to see some of

87
00:04:12.120 --> 00:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that now forming in the sentence it takes in her lumbs.

88
00:04:14.599 --> 00:04:19.319
<v Speaker 1>For example, she's really advocating heavily for the Bitcoin Stugut Reserve.

89
00:04:19.399 --> 00:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>That's her passion project, and it is very likely since

90
00:04:22.560 --> 00:04:24.720
<v Speaker 1>she's the subcommittee chair, we're going to have hearings on this.

91
00:04:25.199 --> 00:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, for a long time a lot of

92
00:04:27.120 --> 00:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>people on Twitter have been following a lot of our

93
00:04:28.959 --> 00:04:31.399
<v Speaker 1>pro crypto champions and they've been saying some great things.

94
00:04:31.439 --> 00:04:33.839
<v Speaker 1>But the reality now is that these are folks who

95
00:04:33.839 --> 00:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>are now in charge of these subcommittee souse the tweaks

96
00:04:36.600 --> 00:04:37.199
<v Speaker 1>matter a lot.

97
00:04:37.279 --> 00:04:38.560
<v Speaker 3>What they view matters a lot.

98
00:04:38.600 --> 00:04:40.439
<v Speaker 1>It's going to dictate what hearings happen, as well as

99
00:04:40.480 --> 00:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>what bills move forward and what bills don't move forward.

100
00:04:42.879 --> 00:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>And so we have a lot of good allies and

101
00:04:45.560 --> 00:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>allies and power positions, and that really does pave a

102
00:04:49.079 --> 00:04:52.639
<v Speaker 1>way for potentially a really positive pro crypto Congress. But

103
00:04:52.759 --> 00:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>still there will be political hurdles in the way, so

104
00:04:55.639 --> 00:04:57.199
<v Speaker 1>we'll help the deal with that as time comes on.

105
00:04:58.120 --> 00:05:02.199
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of hurdles, yesterday I saw Elizabeth Warren send some

106
00:05:02.279 --> 00:05:07.199
<v Speaker 2>topics or questions for the Scott was sent confirmation hearing

107
00:05:07.639 --> 00:05:10.360
<v Speaker 2>seems like she's trying to ramp up her anti crypto

108
00:05:10.839 --> 00:05:14.079
<v Speaker 2>sentiment and talking points again exactly.

109
00:05:14.120 --> 00:05:16.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was probably the worst blunder, I would

110
00:05:16.439 --> 00:05:18.519
<v Speaker 1>say of the campaign cycle, at least in our very

111
00:05:18.600 --> 00:05:21.720
<v Speaker 1>niche area, was making the anti crypto army and really

112
00:05:21.800 --> 00:05:24.720
<v Speaker 1>leading into it, and that just backfired tremendously, where even

113
00:05:24.720 --> 00:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>when Van Jones was on CNN the other day saying

114
00:05:27.360 --> 00:05:29.199
<v Speaker 1>the war on crypto is one of the reason why

115
00:05:29.199 --> 00:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats lost, which is crazy to hear about that,

116
00:05:31.720 --> 00:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and again years ago not thought that'd be possible. But

117
00:05:34.879 --> 00:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the facts speaking themselves and the votes speak themselves too,

118
00:05:38.360 --> 00:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>And so the question kind of was, where's Listen Warring

119
00:05:41.519 --> 00:05:44.319
<v Speaker 1>to go next. She's just gonna let this go off

120
00:05:44.319 --> 00:05:45.959
<v Speaker 1>to the side and focus on other issues that she

121
00:05:46.120 --> 00:05:49.399
<v Speaker 1>has more priority on, or is she really gonna le

122
00:05:49.600 --> 00:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>double down And that's kind of what we've see. And

123
00:05:51.720 --> 00:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>she's doubling down on crypto, on the idea that's only

124
00:05:55.600 --> 00:05:58.439
<v Speaker 1>used for money laundering, and I think that's going to

125
00:05:58.480 --> 00:06:00.959
<v Speaker 1>present a couple challenges and hurdles and the Senate, you know,

126
00:06:00.959 --> 00:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>mind you again, the Senate for example, there's only a

127
00:06:04.040 --> 00:06:07.279
<v Speaker 1>three vote majority I believe in the Republicans have right now,

128
00:06:07.600 --> 00:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>but for a lot of bills, they're gonna need sixty

129
00:06:09.839 --> 00:06:11.639
<v Speaker 1>members of Congress in the Senate to vote for it,

130
00:06:11.759 --> 00:06:14.199
<v Speaker 1>and so you're going to have to work with Democrats here.

131
00:06:14.240 --> 00:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>And when Elizabeth Warren is leading the set of band committee,

132
00:06:16.839 --> 00:06:18.439
<v Speaker 1>she will have a lot more power in terms of

133
00:06:18.439 --> 00:06:21.720
<v Speaker 1>whipping Democrats to be anti crypto or voting against certain

134
00:06:21.839 --> 00:06:24.959
<v Speaker 1>pieces of legislation. So she's definitely going to be a hurdle.

135
00:06:25.000 --> 00:06:27.720
<v Speaker 1>And that was definitely an opening salvo in terms of

136
00:06:27.759 --> 00:06:30.639
<v Speaker 1>how she's going to view the Tcharnity secretary nomination and

137
00:06:30.879 --> 00:06:33.600
<v Speaker 1>most likely pretty soon the sec nomination that comes her

138
00:06:33.600 --> 00:06:35.639
<v Speaker 1>Senate banking that's gonna be her committee as well. So

139
00:06:36.920 --> 00:06:38.519
<v Speaker 1>get ready for that because I think e lizebth Warren

140
00:06:38.560 --> 00:06:40.759
<v Speaker 1>is doubling down. And you know, the good thing is

141
00:06:40.800 --> 00:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>that we have the facts on our side, and we

142
00:06:42.439 --> 00:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of momentum, and I think she is

143
00:06:45.120 --> 00:06:47.519
<v Speaker 1>going to be the naysayer, but for the most part

144
00:06:48.000 --> 00:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>she's in minority. So the good thing is that we

145
00:06:49.600 --> 00:06:52.079
<v Speaker 1>can move forward with the pro crypto members and the majority.

146
00:06:52.680 --> 00:06:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, a good, great point, she's in the minority.

147
00:06:56.240 --> 00:06:58.519
<v Speaker 2>And and I remember Chuck Schumer part of the Senate.

148
00:06:58.560 --> 00:07:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Of course, at the end of twin twenty four, he was,

149
00:07:01.639 --> 00:07:04.279
<v Speaker 2>you know, on the side of getting legislation through. So

150
00:07:04.319 --> 00:07:08.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm hoping he can raise his voice and get some

151
00:07:08.120 --> 00:07:10.759
<v Speaker 2>more Democrats to back him in the Senate exactly.

152
00:07:10.800 --> 00:07:12.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you take the SAB one twenty one vote

153
00:07:12.720 --> 00:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that happened a couple months ago. Chuck Schumer and several

154
00:07:15.639 --> 00:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>other Democrats in the Senate, they bucked Liz of Warren

155
00:07:18.319 --> 00:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and they voted to repeal SAB one twenty one. It

156
00:07:20.839 --> 00:07:22.959
<v Speaker 1>was actually Joe Buying new vetoed. It's still but that

157
00:07:23.040 --> 00:07:25.639
<v Speaker 1>bill itself was the most by Parson Bill Joe Bying

158
00:07:25.759 --> 00:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>ever vetoed in his administration, which is crazy to think about,

159
00:07:29.319 --> 00:07:31.519
<v Speaker 1>but that out of all the bills out there, that

160
00:07:31.680 --> 00:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>was the one that had the most by parts in support.

161
00:07:33.480 --> 00:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>So internally, we're feeling pretty good in terms of, you know,

162
00:07:36.199 --> 00:07:38.519
<v Speaker 1>we educate our allies, We've reached out to, you know,

163
00:07:39.199 --> 00:07:41.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe different constituencies that we want to care about Crypto

164
00:07:42.399 --> 00:07:44.399
<v Speaker 1>U and it's worked in the past, and now we

165
00:07:44.480 --> 00:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>have a much better field and chessboard in terms of

166
00:07:47.079 --> 00:07:51.879
<v Speaker 1>getting legislation through blocking big bad rules or bad legislation, uh, and.

167
00:07:51.800 --> 00:07:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Then getting things done. This is the crunch time here.

168
00:07:54.680 --> 00:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Next year and a half two years are going to

169
00:07:56.199 --> 00:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>be really really busy here in DC, and we want

170
00:07:59.040 --> 00:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to get as much accomplished can before you know, whatever

171
00:08:02.240 --> 00:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>happens the election next go around.

172
00:08:04.759 --> 00:08:07.879
<v Speaker 2>Now, speaking of SAB one to one, there are talks

173
00:08:08.000 --> 00:08:12.480
<v Speaker 2>about Donald Trump, who's the inaugurations next week, that we

174
00:08:12.560 --> 00:08:15.720
<v Speaker 2>may see day one some sort of crypto executive order,

175
00:08:15.879 --> 00:08:18.439
<v Speaker 2>possibly the repeal ASAB one to one. Are these just

176
00:08:18.519 --> 00:08:22.279
<v Speaker 2>rumors or are there any valid validity to them?

177
00:08:22.759 --> 00:08:22.839
<v Speaker 3>So?

178
00:08:22.879 --> 00:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking with the executive director for the Hubble

179
00:08:25.600 --> 00:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Crypto Council BOHINES pretty extensively through the past couple of

180
00:08:29.839 --> 00:08:32.879
<v Speaker 1>weeks as well. My boss is David Sachs, and it

181
00:08:32.879 --> 00:08:35.639
<v Speaker 1>seems like there's a decent amount of executive orders on deck.

182
00:08:36.240 --> 00:08:36.399
<v Speaker 2>Now.

183
00:08:36.440 --> 00:08:39.159
<v Speaker 1>The question is will this be a day one executive order,

184
00:08:39.200 --> 00:08:41.559
<v Speaker 1>a week one executive order, or sometime in the first

185
00:08:41.639 --> 00:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred days. It seems like, according to initial reports, we'll

186
00:08:44.440 --> 00:08:47.279
<v Speaker 1>probably get next week. And if I had to imagine

187
00:08:47.279 --> 00:08:49.879
<v Speaker 1>what these executive orders would be, I imagine SAV one twenty

188
00:08:49.960 --> 00:08:52.279
<v Speaker 1>one is right on the top of the list, as

189
00:08:52.279 --> 00:08:56.559
<v Speaker 1>well as creating the actual Crypto Council. It's unclear still

190
00:08:56.720 --> 00:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to this extent if it's going to be ten companies,

191
00:08:59.360 --> 00:09:02.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty companies, executives one hundred. There's been reports in all

192
00:09:02.919 --> 00:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>three numbers, but overall they need to make an executive

193
00:09:05.679 --> 00:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>order to make this council. So I think we're sure

194
00:09:07.519 --> 00:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll see a council formation in the details of that

195
00:09:10.200 --> 00:09:12.559
<v Speaker 1>unfold next week. We could see us that one twenty

196
00:09:12.639 --> 00:09:15.519
<v Speaker 1>one repeal. We could see something on dbanking, or we

197
00:09:15.559 --> 00:09:17.879
<v Speaker 1>can also see something about changing the ethics rules for

198
00:09:18.360 --> 00:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>White House employees or administration employees that they can actually

199
00:09:21.279 --> 00:09:23.519
<v Speaker 1>hold crypto, because when I was a Hill staffer, I

200
00:09:23.559 --> 00:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't hold crypto, but it was very detrimental to me

201
00:09:26.360 --> 00:09:29.080
<v Speaker 1>personally just to learn the issue. And I think that's

202
00:09:29.519 --> 00:09:31.679
<v Speaker 1>one of the education encounters we've had is just a

203
00:09:31.720 --> 00:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of people refuse to touch it because they don't

204
00:09:34.399 --> 00:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>want to be you know, in law or a flaw

205
00:09:37.279 --> 00:09:39.399
<v Speaker 1>I guess of the epics law. So that tweak is

206
00:09:39.399 --> 00:09:41.320
<v Speaker 1>going to need a lot as well. So there's a

207
00:09:41.360 --> 00:09:43.039
<v Speaker 1>wide variety of issues that they could probably do the

208
00:09:43.080 --> 00:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>executive order on and then probably will be multiple, but

209
00:09:46.120 --> 00:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>for sure it seems like we're going to sell you

210
00:09:47.519 --> 00:09:48.159
<v Speaker 1>next week.

211
00:09:49.000 --> 00:09:51.960
<v Speaker 2>When you say Crypto Council, and you know, we got

212
00:09:51.960 --> 00:09:56.120
<v Speaker 2>a white house, cryptos are and all these people. Almost

213
00:09:56.519 --> 00:09:58.879
<v Speaker 2>I feel I have to pinch myself because it doesn't

214
00:09:58.919 --> 00:10:02.120
<v Speaker 2>feel real, like I couldn't have expictured this.

215
00:10:03.360 --> 00:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>The crazy thing is in DC is I mean again,

216
00:10:05.799 --> 00:10:07.799
<v Speaker 1>I've been in the policies hide when like no one

217
00:10:07.840 --> 00:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>cared about Crypto. Man, I was twenty seventeen, twenty twenty,

218
00:10:10.799 --> 00:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one. Things are change a little bit, but

219
00:10:13.080 --> 00:10:15.159
<v Speaker 1>now we are kind of the hottest player in town.

220
00:10:15.799 --> 00:10:18.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, if we have a lot of allies in Congress,

221
00:10:18.440 --> 00:10:19.759
<v Speaker 1>the administration is.

222
00:10:21.200 --> 00:10:22.399
<v Speaker 3>Head over heels of Crypto.

223
00:10:22.519 --> 00:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>A lot of folks are donating to the inauguration as

224
00:10:25.720 --> 00:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>well as just more to the campaign itself. And there

225
00:10:28.159 --> 00:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a whole revital here and Crypto is

226
00:10:30.440 --> 00:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>leading the charge. And so we'll see how long that

227
00:10:33.120 --> 00:10:35.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, honeymoon period lasts. But at least right now

228
00:10:36.039 --> 00:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of optimism in DC and just generally

229
00:10:38.240 --> 00:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>with the community, and Crypto is making a huge impact

230
00:10:40.879 --> 00:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>in DC and the social scene. I mean, we have

231
00:10:42.559 --> 00:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the Crypto ball coming up on front Snoop Dogg is

232
00:10:45.360 --> 00:10:50.519
<v Speaker 1>performing at where do we go over here? And you know,

233
00:10:50.679 --> 00:10:52.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad everyone's going to be celebrating stuff. We had

234
00:10:52.960 --> 00:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of work ahead of us. But it's weird

235
00:10:55.240 --> 00:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>how crypto is now a major force in DC and

236
00:10:58.759 --> 00:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>DC is welcoming it right now, and that's been very

237
00:11:01.120 --> 00:11:02.639
<v Speaker 1>different in the past couple of years.

238
00:11:02.919 --> 00:11:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh, absolutely complete one eighty. You mentioned that the inauguration

239
00:11:07.559 --> 00:11:10.600
<v Speaker 2>ball is that hosted? Who's putting that together? And is

240
00:11:10.600 --> 00:11:11.639
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump gonna attend?

241
00:11:12.639 --> 00:11:15.159
<v Speaker 1>To my knowledge, no, we won't have any vans or

242
00:11:15.159 --> 00:11:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Trump will not be there, but it's apparently Sacks's events.

243
00:11:18.200 --> 00:11:20.919
<v Speaker 1>I think Bitcoin Magazine I believe is one of the

244
00:11:21.000 --> 00:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>organizers as well as well as Bitcoin Media.

245
00:11:23.440 --> 00:11:25.000
<v Speaker 3>There's a couple other inauguration events.

246
00:11:25.039 --> 00:11:27.679
<v Speaker 1>Every state society does their own events, so it's you know,

247
00:11:27.960 --> 00:11:30.759
<v Speaker 1>the time for balls and pageants all during an auguration

248
00:11:30.879 --> 00:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>week and then come next week after Trump's in office,

249
00:11:35.159 --> 00:11:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the real work begins and there's a lot So we

250
00:11:37.519 --> 00:11:40.919
<v Speaker 1>have nominations, we have bills moving forward, we have committees

251
00:11:40.960 --> 00:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>being formed, so you know, this is the honeymoon period,

252
00:11:43.360 --> 00:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's gonna be very briefly over and it's going

253
00:11:45.519 --> 00:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to get really really busy soon.

254
00:11:48.360 --> 00:11:48.559
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

255
00:11:48.559 --> 00:11:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. I think after all this got to be heads down,

256
00:11:51.399 --> 00:11:53.960
<v Speaker 2>get to work right, and we got some opposition to

257
00:11:54.000 --> 00:11:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Elizabeth Warren, so we got definitely put the work in. Now.

258
00:11:57.559 --> 00:12:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Gary Genser a current SEC chair, but he is going

259
00:12:00.279 --> 00:12:02.120
<v Speaker 2>to be out by next week. He's been doing some

260
00:12:02.200 --> 00:12:05.879
<v Speaker 2>exit interviews this week. Seems he's trying to save some

261
00:12:06.039 --> 00:12:09.440
<v Speaker 2>face here. But it comes in the week that another

262
00:12:09.759 --> 00:12:14.320
<v Speaker 2>judge calls the SEC arbitrary and capricious, second time under

263
00:12:14.399 --> 00:12:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Gary Gainster's tenure. This is kind of crazy. What are

264
00:12:17.600 --> 00:12:18.360
<v Speaker 2>your thoughts on all this?

265
00:12:19.720 --> 00:12:21.679
<v Speaker 1>It's I think one of the main facts is that

266
00:12:22.000 --> 00:12:24.559
<v Speaker 1>the arguments of the industry has been having for years

267
00:12:24.639 --> 00:12:27.799
<v Speaker 1>has now gone mainstream. He's seeing CNBC anchors pushing him

268
00:12:27.840 --> 00:12:31.320
<v Speaker 1>back against Kensler and trying to have his legacy of sorts.

269
00:12:31.799 --> 00:12:34.440
<v Speaker 1>We've seen the judges in the third circuit to the

270
00:12:34.440 --> 00:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>coinbase case. It was two Democrats and one Republican judge,

271
00:12:37.320 --> 00:12:40.639
<v Speaker 1>and they all voted that it was arbitrary and capricious

272
00:12:40.679 --> 00:12:43.399
<v Speaker 1>on the SEC end, not to provide clear rules of

273
00:12:43.399 --> 00:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the road and to explain their reasoning. So I'm excited

274
00:12:46.039 --> 00:12:48.519
<v Speaker 1>to see what the SEC reasoning is for not providing

275
00:12:48.519 --> 00:12:50.159
<v Speaker 1>the rules of the road, because we've been asking this

276
00:12:50.200 --> 00:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>for years and Coinbasse has done a hell the job

277
00:12:53.000 --> 00:12:54.519
<v Speaker 1>both on the legal front, but I was well in

278
00:12:54.559 --> 00:12:57.879
<v Speaker 1>the lobbying policy front, educating members and really leading the

279
00:12:57.960 --> 00:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>charge here. So we're really excited from all the work

280
00:13:00.320 --> 00:13:03.039
<v Speaker 1>they're doing on the court side, and it's going to

281
00:13:03.159 --> 00:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>yield them, hopefully some really positive results with a new

282
00:13:06.399 --> 00:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>SEC at the helm and so against is a wounded animal.

283
00:13:09.960 --> 00:13:11.279
<v Speaker 1>You know, we'll see if he does anything else in

284
00:13:11.320 --> 00:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the last few days, but that was a major blow,

285
00:13:13.559 --> 00:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I think his PR press tour for

286
00:13:16.159 --> 00:13:18.720
<v Speaker 1>his waning days are not going as well as maybe

287
00:13:18.720 --> 00:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>he predicted.

288
00:13:19.799 --> 00:13:20.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

289
00:13:20.080 --> 00:13:24.679
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, Now Paul Atkins, of course is the next SEC chair.

290
00:13:25.000 --> 00:13:27.080
<v Speaker 2>When do you think he might be confirmed? Is it

291
00:13:27.120 --> 00:13:28.279
<v Speaker 2>towards the end of January?

292
00:13:29.200 --> 00:13:29.840
<v Speaker 3>I believe so.

293
00:13:29.840 --> 00:13:31.799
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like he's still work on some paperwork

294
00:13:32.240 --> 00:13:34.679
<v Speaker 1>from internal sources, and we're having some of the nomination

295
00:13:34.759 --> 00:13:37.639
<v Speaker 1>hearings this week. So Hegsek was yesterday that a lot

296
00:13:37.639 --> 00:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of folks we're you know more spout around in the

297
00:13:40.120 --> 00:13:43.559
<v Speaker 1>media for we have best on Thursday, we have plenty

298
00:13:43.600 --> 00:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of other ones for other agencies and posts, but it doesn't.

299
00:13:47.000 --> 00:13:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Have any yet for the SEC.

300
00:13:48.279 --> 00:13:50.679
<v Speaker 1>So I do think either next week or the week after,

301
00:13:50.759 --> 00:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll probably see hopefully Atkins in front of Set and Banking.

302
00:13:54.080 --> 00:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>But again, liztid Warren is going to be the Democrat

303
00:13:56.600 --> 00:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>lead on that committee, and so how heavy does she

304
00:13:59.240 --> 00:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>go into crypto much to focus on other issues are

305
00:14:01.399 --> 00:14:03.279
<v Speaker 1>going to be really telling for the next two years

306
00:14:03.279 --> 00:14:05.679
<v Speaker 1>where Warren's really gonna you know, dig in. But already

307
00:14:05.679 --> 00:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>we've seen crypto as one of our topics she's going

308
00:14:07.639 --> 00:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to be doubling down on, so we're really excited to

309
00:14:09.600 --> 00:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>see kind of how that goes forward. It seems like

310
00:14:11.279 --> 00:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Atkins is viewed as a non controversial pick and so

311
00:14:14.360 --> 00:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>likely move forward and hopefully he can get into place

312
00:14:16.559 --> 00:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>very soon. So folks like Hesser, Purse and market Wada

313
00:14:19.399 --> 00:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and several other than the staff side who've been waiting

314
00:14:21.440 --> 00:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>for years for this moment.

315
00:14:22.519 --> 00:14:24.960
<v Speaker 3>It can start working on rulemaking and uh, you know.

316
00:14:24.879 --> 00:14:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Getting the clarity of the industry needs and working with

317
00:14:27.320 --> 00:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Congress to get a legislation pass absolutely.

318
00:14:31.320 --> 00:14:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Now, I know government moves slow. You know, we're talking

319
00:14:35.480 --> 00:14:38.399
<v Speaker 2>about obviously a pro crypto president coming into office, pro

320
00:14:38.440 --> 00:14:43.960
<v Speaker 2>crypto Congress, they Senate subcommittee. Are you viewing possibly some

321
00:14:44.000 --> 00:14:47.360
<v Speaker 2>sort of bill getting through Lake qu two or possibly

322
00:14:47.360 --> 00:14:48.320
<v Speaker 2>towards the end of the year.

323
00:14:49.120 --> 00:14:51.559
<v Speaker 1>So french Hill, who's leaning the Final Service Committee, he

324
00:14:51.559 --> 00:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>said he wants a stable coin bill done the first

325
00:14:53.840 --> 00:14:54.559
<v Speaker 1>one hundred days.

326
00:14:54.759 --> 00:14:56.720
<v Speaker 3>Now does dun mean out of the committee?

327
00:14:56.759 --> 00:14:59.559
<v Speaker 1>Does that done mean out of the House or do

328
00:14:59.679 --> 00:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the press since desk It's a little unclear. Obviously, a

329
00:15:02.519 --> 00:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of these timelines can be very valuable considering that

330
00:15:05.320 --> 00:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot that's facing Congress right now again all

331
00:15:07.440 --> 00:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the nominations, they have to avoid a budget or a

332
00:15:09.600 --> 00:15:11.919
<v Speaker 1>budget fight in March, and then they're going to be

333
00:15:11.919 --> 00:15:13.759
<v Speaker 1>trying to push a tax bill, which cryptos will be

334
00:15:13.799 --> 00:15:16.399
<v Speaker 1>trying to push a lot of pieces as well there.

335
00:15:16.440 --> 00:15:18.879
<v Speaker 1>So it's likely we'll probably see some movement in the

336
00:15:18.879 --> 00:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>committees from french Hill on both market structure and stable coins.

337
00:15:22.480 --> 00:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>But I imagine stable coin goes first, and we'll probably

338
00:15:25.360 --> 00:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>have hearings early on in March, so maybe in February

339
00:15:28.200 --> 00:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>as well, and now probably progress to a committee vote

340
00:15:31.320 --> 00:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>on stable coins. I'm hoping in Q one, but it

341
00:15:34.200 --> 00:15:37.519
<v Speaker 1>could be early Q two as well. So this is Congress.

342
00:15:37.519 --> 00:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't move a little slow in the firste hundred

343
00:15:39.519 --> 00:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>days and in mid April, so you know, I think

344
00:15:41.960 --> 00:15:44.799
<v Speaker 1>we we'll see some progress there, but when it comes

345
00:15:44.840 --> 00:15:47.039
<v Speaker 1>to fit and market structure, that might take a little

346
00:15:47.080 --> 00:15:49.919
<v Speaker 1>longer time because that bill was still not as flushed

347
00:15:49.919 --> 00:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>out and we haven't seen really the same work in

348
00:15:52.399 --> 00:15:54.799
<v Speaker 1>the Senate in terms of moving that bill forward.

349
00:15:54.879 --> 00:15:55.879
<v Speaker 3>So I would look at.

350
00:15:55.799 --> 00:15:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Stable coins first, but also we look at a lot

351
00:15:57.879 --> 00:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of hearings. You know, we've always seen Cen I want

352
00:16:00.320 --> 00:16:02.159
<v Speaker 1>to say, she wants to do a hearing on dbanking

353
00:16:02.279 --> 00:16:04.639
<v Speaker 1>and they'll probably a hot topic in the House as well,

354
00:16:05.159 --> 00:16:07.159
<v Speaker 1>finding out what happened with Operation show point two point

355
00:16:07.240 --> 00:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>zero that folks are calling it and going over to

356
00:16:09.480 --> 00:16:12.519
<v Speaker 1>the FDIC records that have been coming out through Coinbase's

357
00:16:12.519 --> 00:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>efforts and several others on Twitter. So I think that's

358
00:16:15.600 --> 00:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna take aou a lot of their time early on,

359
00:16:17.519 --> 00:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>but they're gonna they're dedicated to move something pretty quickly.

360
00:16:20.480 --> 00:16:22.759
<v Speaker 1>So french Hill especially is someone who likes to get

361
00:16:22.759 --> 00:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>something across the finish line, and so I would look

362
00:16:25.440 --> 00:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to him to be the first mover here. And I

363
00:16:27.639 --> 00:16:29.879
<v Speaker 1>would see the House hopefully done in the first hundred

364
00:16:29.960 --> 00:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>days moving a stable coin bill, or you can at

365
00:16:32.159 --> 00:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>least out of the committee.

366
00:16:34.039 --> 00:16:36.759
<v Speaker 2>Final question, and this one's a hard one, but I'm

367
00:16:36.840 --> 00:16:40.159
<v Speaker 2>curious of what you're hearing in the DC circles. Do

368
00:16:40.200 --> 00:16:43.639
<v Speaker 2>you anticipate under Paul Atkins that the SEC may drop

369
00:16:43.679 --> 00:16:47.720
<v Speaker 2>some of the non fraud cases and even speed up

370
00:16:47.720 --> 00:16:50.039
<v Speaker 2>some of the settlements things that are you know, like, hey,

371
00:16:50.120 --> 00:16:53.519
<v Speaker 2>let's settle with Ripple and done right, move forward. Do

372
00:16:53.519 --> 00:16:55.759
<v Speaker 2>you think you might we might see stuff like that?

373
00:16:55.759 --> 00:16:57.799
<v Speaker 1>That's a hope. I mean, there were some talks potentially

374
00:16:57.840 --> 00:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of the EO that I mentioned earlier. Maybe there's something

375
00:17:00.399 --> 00:17:03.159
<v Speaker 1>on the current litigation that they can do there. It's

376
00:17:03.159 --> 00:17:06.920
<v Speaker 1>still unclear, to be honest, but I'm pretty sure we

377
00:17:06.960 --> 00:17:09.519
<v Speaker 1>will see actins at least have some push to resolve

378
00:17:09.559 --> 00:17:12.039
<v Speaker 1>as many of these cases quickly. Some of them have

379
00:17:12.119 --> 00:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>progressed pretty far in the courts, and that does create

380
00:17:14.480 --> 00:17:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a couple of other problems and issues, and so at

381
00:17:17.440 --> 00:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>least a couple of lawyers I'm talking to, it's a

382
00:17:20.119 --> 00:17:22.400
<v Speaker 1>little unclear exactly where the litigation is going to fall

383
00:17:22.440 --> 00:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>with actions at the HELM, but overall, it does seem

384
00:17:25.240 --> 00:17:27.519
<v Speaker 1>again more in a positive direction. It does seem that

385
00:17:27.519 --> 00:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>there will be a settlement and then hopefully we'll get

386
00:17:30.200 --> 00:17:33.319
<v Speaker 1>some clear regulation from the SEC as well as legislation.

387
00:17:33.559 --> 00:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's not a guarantee, so we'll have to wait

388
00:17:36.480 --> 00:17:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and see what happens.

389
00:17:37.960 --> 00:17:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, just the end of regulation by enforcement

390
00:17:40.960 --> 00:17:43.519
<v Speaker 2>itself is such a great thing. But if they can

391
00:17:43.599 --> 00:17:46.720
<v Speaker 2>drop some of these non fraud cases where they're waiting

392
00:17:46.759 --> 00:17:50.720
<v Speaker 2>on Congress, like okay, crypto staking, well we need Congress

393
00:17:50.720 --> 00:17:53.319
<v Speaker 2>to probably tell us if staking itself is a security

394
00:17:53.400 --> 00:17:57.400
<v Speaker 2>or not. Gary Ginser says stable coins is a security. Well,

395
00:17:57.519 --> 00:17:59.880
<v Speaker 2>cases are on stable coin, maybe told drop that and

396
00:18:00.079 --> 00:18:02.759
<v Speaker 2>let wait for the stable coin legislation and all these things, right,

397
00:18:03.119 --> 00:18:06.839
<v Speaker 2>which once again not fraud. When someone stole money and

398
00:18:06.880 --> 00:18:09.519
<v Speaker 2>they did bad things, you know, do what you gotta do.

399
00:18:09.920 --> 00:18:12.480
<v Speaker 2>But some of these cases are just bs, like the

400
00:18:12.519 --> 00:18:16.000
<v Speaker 2>one against coinbase and crack and so forth, Robinhood, these

401
00:18:16.000 --> 00:18:17.480
<v Speaker 2>are exactly yeah.

402
00:18:17.119 --> 00:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>And like and a lot again to your point, there's

403
00:18:19.200 --> 00:18:21.599
<v Speaker 1>a lot of efforts in Congress. It takes staking. For example,

404
00:18:21.839 --> 00:18:24.079
<v Speaker 1>there's a high chance you can see something on staking

405
00:18:24.160 --> 00:18:27.119
<v Speaker 1>in the big tax bill on reference that's done the

406
00:18:27.119 --> 00:18:31.039
<v Speaker 1>pipeline Q one Q two. So with all these court actions,

407
00:18:31.079 --> 00:18:33.440
<v Speaker 1>we could have you know, congressional action that undoes or

408
00:18:33.599 --> 00:18:35.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, mitigates all of what's happening in the court.

409
00:18:35.880 --> 00:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>So when I say it's going to be really really

410
00:18:38.279 --> 00:18:41.039
<v Speaker 1>busy these first two quarters, it's going to be a whirlwind.

411
00:18:41.039 --> 00:18:42.640
<v Speaker 1>And the question is just like how far on the

412
00:18:42.640 --> 00:18:45.400
<v Speaker 1>pro crypto side or how far can we move positive

413
00:18:45.440 --> 00:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>elements forward while shedding a lot of the issues that

414
00:18:49.240 --> 00:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>have occurred the past four years. And that's what we're saying, folks,

415
00:18:51.960 --> 00:18:54.519
<v Speaker 1>especially things like de banking, which are very important. Still,

416
00:18:54.519 --> 00:18:56.559
<v Speaker 1>it's very good to get the bomb of it. So hey, like,

417
00:18:56.640 --> 00:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>let's focus a little bit on this, but let's get

418
00:18:58.680 --> 00:19:01.759
<v Speaker 1>to the nitty already here, and let's get some legislation

419
00:19:02.160 --> 00:19:05.279
<v Speaker 1>moved and let's sign the law because we don't have

420
00:19:05.319 --> 00:19:07.599
<v Speaker 1>too much time. And this is a very rare, you know,

421
00:19:07.920 --> 00:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>instance where you have a full Republican sweep, and timing

422
00:19:11.319 --> 00:19:12.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the essence because there's a.

423
00:19:12.920 --> 00:19:15.799
<v Speaker 3>Lot of other priorities besides crypto.

424
00:19:16.039 --> 00:19:17.920
<v Speaker 1>But the good news is that crypto has made the

425
00:19:18.000 --> 00:19:21.079
<v Speaker 1>priority list, So that is something that we didn't expect

426
00:19:21.640 --> 00:19:22.119
<v Speaker 1>years ago.

427
00:19:22.160 --> 00:19:22.799
<v Speaker 3>But here we are.

428
00:19:22.720 --> 00:19:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Now absolutely ron as always my friend. Thank you so

429
00:19:26.960 --> 00:19:29.960
<v Speaker 2>much for the information and the insights. Appreciate you and

430
00:19:30.200 --> 00:19:32.160
<v Speaker 2>we'll probably have to have you back on maybe next

431
00:19:32.160 --> 00:19:33.920
<v Speaker 2>secret of the week after because it is so much,

432
00:19:34.000 --> 00:19:34.920
<v Speaker 2>but thank you so much.

433
00:19:35.200 --> 00:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Sounds good, I wish you're coming to the ball Tony

434
00:19:37.000 --> 00:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and well I'm always at a check so looking forward

435
00:19:39.720 --> 00:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to it.
