Speaker 1: Big camp full spreading disease from the shots monkeys. Okay,
Speaker 1: now we're back. So there was something going on with
Speaker 1: one of the tabs up here. I couldn't find it,
Speaker 1: so we were hearing another broadcast. At least I was
Speaker 1: in my headset, so I was hearing myself with a delay,
Speaker 1: and I was trying to close every box and couldn't
Speaker 1: find which one it was, so I had to start.
Speaker 2: All over come to find out.
Speaker 1: FTJ Media was just playing for some reason, and it
Speaker 1: wasn't even set to the channel.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 1: The screen was not showing the video, but it was
Speaker 1: still playing it explain that for me. I can tell
Speaker 1: because it has a little audio thing over the top
Speaker 1: of the icon in the tab when it's playing, but
Speaker 1: it wasn't even on that page.
Speaker 2: Very interesting. Let me go ahead and do a couple
Speaker 2: of two three things there.
Speaker 1: I have to leave at nine or nine fifteen, and
Speaker 1: then I'll be back to finish the show. So is
Speaker 1: there gonna be an A and B today? But I
Speaker 1: have to go to well, I don't have to want to,
Speaker 1: and I'm going to go to my daughter's little whether
Speaker 1: I don't know. If you want to call the ceremony.
Speaker 1: Whatever the hell it is, it's going into.
Speaker 2: The un roll. What is this now? Is everything about?
Speaker 2: Shut the fuck up? Everybody?
Speaker 1: Everything wants to play? All right, there we go, no
Speaker 1: more echoes, no more delays. So I have something from
Speaker 1: Michael Desirian here. I'm gonna play for you, and it
Speaker 1: is do we even't have anybody on here? Ihead it
Speaker 1: jump back back and forth though, oh three fucking fantastic gold.
Speaker 2: I'm here.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well.
Speaker 1: All right, well anyway, we're gonna get this kicked off.
Speaker 1: And I have this video here. It's actually looks like
Speaker 1: Internet archive is working. I was able to download a
Speaker 1: PDF file two of.
Speaker 2: Them, I think, yep, last night, so I don't know
Speaker 2: if they're all restored, but the ones I was looking
Speaker 2: for were and that was cool.
Speaker 1: So I'll have more books to read and more stuff
Speaker 1: to share. Lovely, we're back in business. And by the way,
Speaker 1: so everybody, thank you so much for the everybody who
Speaker 1: contributed to the Computer drive fund. I probably would have
Speaker 1: taken more years than I already had to get it
Speaker 1: on my own, because I's, you know, prioritizing.
Speaker 2: Family and stuff like that.
Speaker 1: And also once I would have accumulated that i'd have
Speaker 1: been like, yeah, maybe I'll just hold on to that
Speaker 1: in case there's an emergency, especially with everything else going on,
Speaker 1: it's like, yeah, but since you guys are so awesome
Speaker 1: and I can't thank you enough, it's over there. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna just do a couple of little quick checks on it.
Speaker 1: But I have to do all that after I get
Speaker 1: done making the sauce, because I have a whole wholesale
Speaker 1: order here, I got Internet orders and go. I've got
Speaker 1: things before I can focus my time. Otherwise I'll be anxiety.
Speaker 1: Well you're not anxiety, but something to be nagging my
Speaker 1: brain telling me I should be doing something else right,
Speaker 1: And that happens to me a lot. So I know
Speaker 1: what I need to get done to get that weight
Speaker 1: off my back of prioritizing. So it's just I gotta
Speaker 1: do it the way I gotta do it. But we're
Speaker 1: gonna watch this thing. It's really old. Video looks like
Speaker 1: from Michael Desaian. The name of it is Origins of Christianity.
Speaker 1: It's bound to probably a few people, given what I've
Speaker 1: read about what he thinks about it so far, there's
Speaker 1: a lot of yes.
Speaker 2: Zam knows. As I read this book, and.
Speaker 1: I did find up the volume one of the book
Speaker 1: that I'm reading now, didn't realize that he even said
Speaker 1: volume two. And I was like, well, he's not going
Speaker 1: back far enough because he's not talking about arians. So
Speaker 1: there's a chapter that's called the Arians and you know,
Speaker 1: like city and stuff in the volume one, So if
Speaker 1: he makes the proper connection, I will retract that statement.
Speaker 2: But he also talks about Atlantis.
Speaker 1: And the Murray and all this other and aliens, and
Speaker 1: so it's like, okay, Bud, you just kind of shot
Speaker 1: yourself in the foot and it traveled into your face
Speaker 1: in through your brain.
Speaker 2: So whatever, let's go ahead and watch this.
Speaker 1: Though that was my debut of I'm not a rapper,
Speaker 1: but I was just like, for some reason, I woke up.
Speaker 2: It was in the shower.
Speaker 1: I was like, big pimple spread and disease. It's from
Speaker 1: the shots, but we're blaming monkeys. I was like, yeah,
Speaker 1: let's put it to music. I know I didn't even
Speaker 1: I didn't even time it right, but I didn't care.
Speaker 1: It's the second time I had to do it because
Speaker 1: of the thing the echo.
Speaker 2: All right, so let's do this. It's called Origins of Christianity.
Speaker 1: Now that's not itself a bold statement to be claiming
Speaker 1: you know all about but there are a lot of connections.
Speaker 1: He does make that tie in the the hebgb's Pharisee.
Speaker 2: So to see blah blah blah blah leaves.
Speaker 1: With the Roman, the Roman way they moved right right,
Speaker 1: like what they did and how they did it and
Speaker 1: why they didn't who actually were the people who were
Speaker 1: the councils that developed this and they.
Speaker 2: Were all guess what oi they?
Speaker 1: Of course they would have been right, But they also
Speaker 1: claimed that Jesus is a Rabbi and a Jew, and
Speaker 1: none of that is true. I may not even been
Speaker 1: a thing. There's other books that show that he may
Speaker 1: have lived centuries prior, and he was from a different
Speaker 1: place all together, and that that's what they adopted when
Speaker 1: they formulated this thing. So that will only make you
Speaker 1: angry until you see what they're saying about and how
Speaker 1: it's not It's almost like, I don't know, maybe you
Speaker 1: could look at it as no, they're validating that he existed.
Speaker 1: They're just saying that the people took the story and
Speaker 1: jacked with it so that they could control the rest
Speaker 1: of the world with it. Eventually, and that's themost and
Speaker 1: that does look where we are. So they did a
Speaker 1: good job.
Speaker 2: All right, let's play it. Boom boom boom boom boom.
Speaker 1: I hate that freaking music. Trust me, I mock it.
Speaker 1: That's why I use it, right, freaking jay z shit.
Speaker 1: Origins of Christianity, everybody.
Speaker 3: Let us just understand it.
Speaker 2: Only the time.
Speaker 4: What we call Judeo Christianity has antiquity. It originates from
Speaker 4: far in distant times than from the dates that we
Speaker 4: are officially given.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 4: President John Adams, President of the United States, John Adams
Speaker 4: said that the government of the United States is not
Speaker 4: in any sense founded on the Christian religion, the doctrine
Speaker 4: of the divinity of Jesus.
Speaker 1: What's funny about this is somebody by the name of
Speaker 1: Kenneth Wheeler. I've left a big, long message on his
Speaker 1: comment on his video yesterday because he was talking about
Speaker 1: secret society's Freemasonry, Illuminati type.
Speaker 2: Of stuff, and he states this.
Speaker 1: Right, that the government of the United States is not
Speaker 1: in any sense founded on the Christian religion or the
Speaker 1: Protestant but in this other Freemasonic kabbalistic idealism of you
Speaker 1: know what do.
Speaker 2: You call it?
Speaker 1: Thomas Paine's age of recent type of stuff. They were
Speaker 1: all they followed him, right, and he was one of
Speaker 1: their spokesmen. But this is all coming from rescruction. And
Speaker 1: then you gotta look at it. It's around the same
Speaker 1: time that the infiltration occurred during the UH. So right
Speaker 1: around there was gonna there was gonna be the Francas
Speaker 1: and the Jesuits moving their way into the Masonic Orders
Speaker 1: abroad and probably here too. So we're looking at seventy six, right,
Speaker 1: they're talking about Adam Shop. So it was happening, but
Speaker 1: not to the level, not to the level that it
Speaker 1: was really taken hold in the seventeen nineties.
Speaker 2: And beyond.
Speaker 1: That being said, though, what Kenneth goes on to say,
Speaker 1: Kenneth Wheeler and his other in his broadcast his little
Speaker 1: video there was not accurate. There was too much credence
Speaker 1: given to this idea of illumination being reality rather than
Speaker 1: a scam. And they utilize Christianity in the Perfectible list
Speaker 1: in or quote unquote Illuminati.
Speaker 2: They said that they.
Speaker 1: Had the true Christianity, they had the true history, the
Speaker 1: true story. So they were using hey, pass a bunch
Speaker 1: of tests, will give you will reveal secrets over time,
Speaker 1: and each time it would have been a live from
Speaker 1: the first, as they do with everything about freemasonry since
Speaker 1: the co.
Speaker 2: Opting of it. Right, But.
Speaker 1: It's nothing different than what Roma did in the very
Speaker 1: very very beginning. All these Christian sects, sects, we're doing
Speaker 1: the same thing initiatory wise secretively, and that's in some
Speaker 1: people like that surprising. No, it's it is, and it isn't.
Speaker 1: I mean, you couldn't even read most people couldn't even
Speaker 1: read the damn thing's and prior to that stuff, let's
Speaker 1: just go on, I'd watched this. But the whole point
Speaker 1: is this idea that it was something good. That's what
Speaker 1: can made it sound like like oh yeah, no, no, no, sir,
Speaker 1: it wasn't good just because they were anti like be
Speaker 1: an anti monarchy. Well, that means you're breaking down and
Speaker 1: destroying your own defenses against a greater evil that's behind it.
Speaker 1: So murdering of the monarchies that happened in the eighteen hundreds.
Speaker 1: Let's say that brought us into World War One and
Speaker 1: World War two, where everything was crumbling and all these
Speaker 1: communist Marxist propaganda, the deed style unstable human beings were
Speaker 1: bombing carriages and assassinating, shooting and poisoning, stabbing, monarchy that
Speaker 1: caused chaos, that caused unrest and instability, so that they
Speaker 1: could move in something worse, but that they controlled, and
Speaker 1: that they could control the people with. So it's like
Speaker 1: everything else. Communism is the wrecking ball. It's not a system,
Speaker 1: it's a wrecking ball. So the fact that this came
Speaker 1: from the same lodges that this illumination did, you can't
Speaker 1: say that this has had anything good about it. Lots
Speaker 1: of lies for the people who are following it, but
Speaker 1: so that not to the point where it's actually doing
Speaker 1: something with ideals in mind or anything positive. It's Frankism
Speaker 1: and Jesuitism mixed together with the Masonic twist and a
Speaker 1: whole bunch of boy vai.
Speaker 2: How can that be a wonderful thing for anybody but them?
Speaker 3: It has made a convenient cover for absurdity.
Speaker 4: President James Madison said, what influence, in fact have Christian
Speaker 4: ecclesiastical establishments had on civil society? In many instances they
Speaker 4: have been upholding the thrones of political tyranny. In no
Speaker 4: instance have they been seen as the guardians of the
Speaker 4: liberties of the people. Rulers who wish to subvert the
Speaker 4: public liberty, how found in the clergy can convenient auxiliaries.
Speaker 4: A just government instituted to secure and perpetuate liberty does
Speaker 4: not need the clergy, right.
Speaker 1: So this is a good separation the church and state
Speaker 1: type of argument here. But also they don't make a
Speaker 1: defining line between Protestantism Lutheranism, which was a little bit more,
Speaker 1: a little bit more pure like lutheranis on Bible. There's
Speaker 1: many versions of the Bible, a lot of them didn't
Speaker 1: have different books.
Speaker 2: I'll go over that all that.
Speaker 1: Stuff when we talk about the book that I'm reading currently.
Speaker 1: Later of this areas where he lists all and it's
Speaker 1: other people's quotes. So it's giving it a little bit more,
Speaker 1: a little bit more weight than just him saying it.
Speaker 2: Now that I know he's an alien Atlantis guy, but
Speaker 2: the what was he just saying? Yeah, So.
Speaker 1: They don't make a distinction whether or not they're talking
Speaker 1: about christian as in Roman Catholicism Popish shit, which was
Speaker 1: completely anti everything that was supposed to stand for, or
Speaker 1: if they're talking about the structure of religion in and
Speaker 1: of itself. So just saying Christianity and saying Christian ideahlahlah
Speaker 1: doesn't have any any place here.
Speaker 2: What are they really saying? Because they were Protestants and
Speaker 2: they were Masons.
Speaker 1: They did, so it's it's not you can't separate that
Speaker 1: just because it's inconvenient there. There are contradictions there, and
Speaker 1: so we have to look at it and kind of
Speaker 1: absorb all the details before assuming that a statement means
Speaker 1: a certain thing, and who's it saying, who's it being
Speaker 1: said by, and what was the instigatory event that made
Speaker 1: them express that? Right, lots of things are action and reaction.
Speaker 1: They're not just sitting around musing in the dark. Something
Speaker 1: is being a oppressive force, like Rome trying to kill
Speaker 1: you and sending Catholics out here and then you know,
Speaker 1: jesuits and all other shit to do so to wipe
Speaker 1: yeah for the freaking kiding for this and that from Austria,
Speaker 1: Austry being the place that they were coming from. So
Speaker 1: all that has to be laid out there so you
Speaker 1: can actually absorb. Okay, so what's the landscape, what's the environment?
Speaker 1: What are they actually talking about? Not just I'm reading pape,
Speaker 1: you know, words on a paper and not understanding why
Speaker 1: this person's expressing it this way.
Speaker 3: Well, wait a minute, that's a heavy piece of information.
Speaker 4: We are still to this day laboring over whether a
Speaker 4: state and church, and church and state should be united,
Speaker 4: or whether they should be a part.
Speaker 3: And yet the.
Speaker 4: Founding fathers of the United States of America were under
Speaker 4: no doubt about it whatsoever.
Speaker 3: How come we haven't been hearing about this.
Speaker 1: Well here's the other thing too. What gave Rise always
Speaker 1: all the time to and actually you know it's actually
Speaker 1: the Constantine the faults. Now, this is another thing I
Speaker 1: should bring up. Constantines, fake and forged gift, I should say.
Speaker 1: We'll get into that later. But that's something that emerged
Speaker 1: four hundred years after his death, and the clergy, Allegedly
Speaker 1: the Romans had this document that basically deeded over the
Speaker 1: ability to make him break kings to the Roman Catholic
Speaker 1: Empire or the Roman Catholic Holy See, whatever you want
Speaker 1: to call it. And it was a complete forgery, but
Speaker 1: it gave them license to do just that, you know,
Speaker 1: those who would follow and believe in it.
Speaker 2: So the separation of the church and state.
Speaker 1: What's funny is church or let's say, religion or priestcraft
Speaker 1: or superstition or cult, whatever was predominant. That was what
Speaker 1: the people who led had to also be, you know,
Speaker 1: at least expressing on the outwardly that they were you know, believing.
Speaker 1: So that's why there was advisors all the time, or
Speaker 1: there was a priest king. You've heard that before, right,
Speaker 1: priest kings. So there was never a separation if it
Speaker 1: wasn't for the belief system of whatever fairy tale that
Speaker 1: they were believing in or maybe half fair tale, half real.
Speaker 2: That was what gave them the license to right to lead.
Speaker 2: If they didn't have one, they didn't have the other.
Speaker 1: So church creates state, church creates the governing body, and
Speaker 1: without their support you don't have a leader anymore because
Speaker 1: they can turn the people on you. And that's the
Speaker 1: power of the advisors to the king since ancient times.
Speaker 1: They can stir up the mob. So the kings are
Speaker 1: at the whim no matter how you want to look
Speaker 1: at this, they've always been. So this idea of separations
Speaker 1: on a church and state. But what is giving them license?
Speaker 1: It's the man out front, but it's really the clergy
Speaker 1: in the back that's running the show, or the priest's
Speaker 1: craft or whatever.
Speaker 2: They're the ones running the.
Speaker 1: Show because at any time they can say nope, you
Speaker 1: can get poison. They can have their people are right
Speaker 1: around you, right controlling. And the same thing happens today
Speaker 1: with politicians, except the OVAs or the priest craft, if
Speaker 1: you will, probably always have been. So there's that element
Speaker 1: to consider what they call it the divine right to rule? Well,
Speaker 1: what makes it divine? Who sets what divinity is? Does
Speaker 1: not the faith or the belief system of that particular area.
Speaker 1: So who runs that belief system, the structure of whatever
Speaker 1: church or cult that they have there? Right, so there
Speaker 1: was never any separation. Really one gave rise or birth.
Speaker 2: To the other. We're hearing that this, So is it
Speaker 2: good to have it separate? Course? Or maybe not? But
Speaker 2: of course or maybe not.
Speaker 4: It is not only the worst of theological tyrannies, but
Speaker 4: the worst of political tyrannies, And that the religious principles
Speaker 4: coming out of Christianity would only be used by the
Speaker 4: most violent and criminalistic of political tyrannies. Thomas Jefferson said,
Speaker 4: I have examined all the known superstations of the world,
Speaker 4: and I do not find in our particular superstation of
Speaker 4: Christianity one redeeming feature. They are all alike founded on
Speaker 4: fables and mythology. Millions of innocent man, women and children
Speaker 4: since the introduction of Christianity have been burned, tortured, fined,
Speaker 4: and imprisoned. What has been the effect of this coercion
Speaker 4: to make one half of the world's fools and the
Speaker 4: other half hypocrites to support roguery and error all over
Speaker 4: the earth? The clergy converted the simple teachings of Jesus
Speaker 4: into an engine for enslaving the world, and adulterated by
Speaker 4: artificial constructions, into a contrivance to filch wealth and power
Speaker 4: to themselves. These clergy, in fact, constitute the real anti Christ.
Speaker 4: In his letter to John Adamson in eighteen twenty three,
Speaker 4: Jefferson said, the day will come when the mystical generation
Speaker 4: of Jesus by the Supreme Being as his father, in
Speaker 4: the womb of a virgin will be classified with the
Speaker 4: fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter.
Speaker 3: So we're saying, fine, habit, worship.
Speaker 4: It if you want, But one of these days at
Speaker 4: least we'll acknowledge that it will be a fable like
Speaker 4: the Greek fables are considered. We love the Greek fables.
Speaker 4: We understand the beauty of those stories. We understand that
Speaker 4: there's a tremendous moral story also written there, but we
Speaker 4: don't take it as being the end all and be all.
Speaker 4: We understand that as a story of fable. How come
Speaker 4: we don't understand that with our own predominant religion because
Speaker 4: we don't want to, because it serves a certain purpose.
Speaker 4: One of the greatest philosophers in humanitarians the world has
Speaker 4: ever known, Thomas Paine. He said it this way, I
Speaker 4: do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish Church,
Speaker 4: by the Roman Church, by the Greek Church, by the
Speaker 4: Turkish Church, by the Protestant Church, nor by any church
Speaker 4: that I know of.
Speaker 3: Each of those churches accused.
Speaker 4: The other of unbelief, and for my own part, I
Speaker 4: disbelieve them all. Dean Milman in his book The History
Speaker 4: of Christianities.
Speaker 2: I believe that comes straight from Age of Reason, which
Speaker 2: is a very interesting book if you haven't read.
Speaker 4: It, that by the invincible power of traditional subserviance, the
Speaker 4: inertia of the general mind, enhanced by the gullibility of ignorance,
Speaker 4: the masses have slipped under the force of a victimization
Speaker 4: that is both pitiable and tragic. The forces of religion
Speaker 4: have thus exerted their rulership over a vast segment of humanity,
Speaker 4: and virtually provided the masses with their conventional ideas and
Speaker 4: concepts as to.
Speaker 3: The meaning of the world ordeal.
Speaker 4: The historian Strabo in ancient times wrote, it is impossible
Speaker 4: to govern a mob of women or the whole mixed
Speaker 4: multitude by philosophical reason, and to exhort them to piety, holiness,
Speaker 4: and faith.
Speaker 3: We must also.
Speaker 2: Employ Strabo had to Rebecca in his life by.
Speaker 4: Superstition, with its fables and prodigies. From the thunder, the abyss,
Speaker 4: the tried and the tortures, the serpents, the thrissie of
Speaker 4: the gods are fables, as is all ancient theology. But
Speaker 4: the legislator introduces these things as bugbears to those who
Speaker 4: are children in understanding. That's my whole point, children in understanding. Okay,
Speaker 4: let's accept it. Let's admit it. We are infantile in
Speaker 4: our understanding, psychologically, theocratically, mystically, spiritually.
Speaker 3: Let's accept that a child can grow.
Speaker 1: So, if I didn't make it clear, this is Michael
Speaker 1: the Syrian, the guy whose book I've been reading to
Speaker 1: you from the introduction of the volume two, and it's
Speaker 1: called the Irish Origins of something ear.
Speaker 2: There I forget.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you a second, the Irish Origins of Civilization.
Speaker 2: There we go.
Speaker 3: It's not the end of the world.
Speaker 4: A child can grow up immature, but in order to mature,
Speaker 4: we have to put away the childish things. Now, collectively speaking,
Speaker 4: this is imminent. This absolutely must happen. There are no
Speaker 4: two ways if we are to inherit any kind of future.
Speaker 3: That is worth the living.
Speaker 4: One of America's greatest scholars in any sense of the word,
Speaker 4: and particularly in astrotheological studies, was the mighty researcher and
Speaker 4: writer Alvin Alvin Boyd Kuhn, and he wrote that the
Speaker 4: supreme charge against Christianity is that it has caused the
Speaker 4: obsession of untold millions of minds with a series of
Speaker 4: fatuous beliefs which have motivated centuries of human actions, perpetrating
Speaker 4: a body of follies, fanaticisms, cruelties, and in humanities unmatched
Speaker 4: in all history. And the instructive difference between Christianity and
Speaker 4: let's say, Greek philosophy is now seen in startling clarity
Speaker 4: as the difference between surrender of the mind in Christianity
Speaker 4: to a series of wild and chemerical fancies in no
Speaker 4: wise based on any correspondence with truth and reality, while
Speaker 4: Greek philosophy was a system of intellectual propositions based on
Speaker 4: a complete harmonization with the known realities, the forces and
Speaker 4: elements of man's constitution, and the laws of the cosmos.
Speaker 4: So Kuon is saying, look, we're not against the fact
Speaker 4: that you have mythologies, fables and legends. Let's have them,
Speaker 4: but can they at least be rooted in the real
Speaker 4: can they.
Speaker 3: At least be articulated in some kind of sanity.
Speaker 4: In a book called Revelations of the Anti Christ, we
Speaker 4: read those initiated into the Sacred Mysteries knew the Gospel
Speaker 4: stories were false, but considered it necessary to keep up
Speaker 4: the imposition for the purposes of propagandism.
Speaker 3: But while this transition of faith.
Speaker 1: So these are quotes that are actually in the book
Speaker 1: that I'm reading, and a lot of this is accurate.
Speaker 1: So this is why we're going over. A lot of
Speaker 1: it isn't, and this is why we're going to analyze
Speaker 1: it too. This is why we're inspecting to Syrian's brain right,
Speaker 1: because he makes very good references to why and how
Speaker 1: the books were augmented changed. They were based on mythology,
Speaker 1: they were formulated for a control mechanism for all three
Speaker 1: of the Abrahamic religions, and.
Speaker 2: That's the point.
Speaker 1: The point is to give more detail on what I've
Speaker 1: been saying and what I've been showing you through mythvision,
Speaker 1: podcasts and Nastaic conformant and all the stuff that they
Speaker 1: researched that they have the you know, references to show
Speaker 1: with how it doesn't have this this long history, that
Speaker 1: this whole idea of Moses and Abraham were all made up, right,
Speaker 1: So that's what we're getting out of this. There's another
Speaker 1: angle to approach the data. So that's why we're going
Speaker 1: over this. But other things that he concludes or maybe
Speaker 1: sometimes pushes under the rug and doesn't go there, I
Speaker 1: think he might be missonic. I'm feeling that the way
Speaker 1: he's presenting it. Some of the people that he's utilizing
Speaker 1: to make that point make his point. They're either the
Speaker 1: illumined ones, if you will, or they should have masons.
Speaker 1: But Mason's from the era of the corruption, So you
Speaker 1: got to take the good with the bad.
Speaker 2: And kind of filter it out. And that's what we're
Speaker 2: trying to do here.
Speaker 1: We're trying to find the pieces of corn within the
Speaker 1: third and preserve those and analyze that too.
Speaker 4: This was going on, some of the more conscientious teachers
Speaker 4: began to tell the people that the Jesus Christ they
Speaker 4: were worshiping was not the historical personage. This was regarded
Speaker 4: by the conservative priests as a dangerous disclosure, and so
Speaker 4: John denounces the innovators as liars and anti Christs, knowing
Speaker 4: that he himself and his fellow priests were the pious
Speaker 4: liars and that the anti Christ were telling the truth.
Speaker 4: Error prevailed, and the mythical Christ became the historical Jesus.
Speaker 4: Elmer h Gruber, in a book called The Original Jesus,
Speaker 4: says that during the early period of the Christian movement,
Speaker 4: the multitude of often contradictory texts was so great that
Speaker 4: the young Church saw only one way of preserving the faith,
Speaker 4: from splitting it into numerous sects, assembling a canon of
Speaker 4: writings and destroying rejected or apocryphal, that is, the hidden texts.
Speaker 4: So we have editing now on a massive scale, the
Speaker 4: idea in order to consolidate because that's the idea.
Speaker 3: We want world government, we want world religion.
Speaker 4: We don't want independent, segregated tribes and nations all believing
Speaker 4: whatever they want.
Speaker 3: Now, we can't have that.
Speaker 4: We have one God now, and we want everyone to
Speaker 4: worship one God. So we'll just try to homogenize the
Speaker 4: whole problem, and anything that remains discordinant, we'll just ban
Speaker 4: it and throw it away and burn it. And then
Speaker 4: we'll create a pr process to sell.
Speaker 3: The creation that we make out of all of that. Now.
Speaker 3: Burton L.
Speaker 4: Mack in his book Who Wrote the New Testament, says
Speaker 4: the writings in the New Testament were not written by
Speaker 4: eyewitnesses of an overpowering divine presence in the midst of
Speaker 4: human history. The Christian Bible turns out to be a
Speaker 4: masterpiece of invention. To be quite frank about it, the
Speaker 4: Bible is the product of a very energetic and successful
Speaker 4: myth making on the part of those early Christians and
Speaker 4: Tony Bushby and his Bible fraud. He says it is
Speaker 4: important to remember that the words authorized and original as
Speaker 4: applied to the Bible do not mean genuine, authentic, or true.
Speaker 4: Tw Dong in his book Bible Myths and their parallels
Speaker 4: and other religions. Says, the canon of the New Testament
Speaker 4: is nothing more or less than a copy of the
Speaker 4: mythological histories of the Hindu savior Krishna and the Buddhist
Speaker 4: savior Buddha with a mixture of mythology.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but here again he doesn't go far enough into
Speaker 1: the history of the Indus Valley and Ganges and where
Speaker 1: these people came from.
Speaker 2: They were the quote unquote Arians.
Speaker 1: They were the original Persians, the people who brought all
Speaker 1: the culture.
Speaker 2: And this is what we were talking about with the Deli,
Speaker 2: Waddell and various other references and resources. People the Northmen came,
Speaker 2: they established sumer in the beginning before it changed hands
Speaker 2: and nature. They were corrupted there. They were.
Speaker 1: Driven out by the Assyrians and they went into India.
Speaker 1: And this is where all this comes from. So it's
Speaker 1: not like when people think about it, maybe thinking India Indian, right,
Speaker 1: like what we see as the population today as it
Speaker 1: looks and the ethnicity of that, But it's not where
Speaker 1: this belief system came from. This came from the Arians, right,
Speaker 1: They had that as their culture. That's what then became
Speaker 1: and adopted and they changed the way that people looked
Speaker 1: and all that. They're not red haired with beards here,
Speaker 1: they're looking like the people of today, as if they
Speaker 1: were the ones that brought those ideas in the first place.
Speaker 1: It's a deception in and of itself. Even that picture
Speaker 1: is right there. So when he says Hindu savior Krishna.
Speaker 2: Who is he really talking about? Krishna?
Speaker 1: Christ right, it's the same kind of word. And he
Speaker 1: goes into that in the book too. So when we
Speaker 1: catch up, because I it's really small print, so we
Speaker 1: only got through ten pages the other day, so we're
Speaker 1: going to get into more.
Speaker 2: Hopefully I can get this done. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I gotta get going, so let me just let this play.
Speaker 1: I'm going to stop interrupting. Thank you for being here.
Speaker 1: And when I come back, there'll be a part be
Speaker 1: to this show, all right, once I get back from
Speaker 1: Faris School, then we'll continue on and I'll start it
Speaker 1: up again.
Speaker 3: Borrowed from the Persians and other nations. Tony Bushby goes on.
Speaker 4: To say it was the wisest fool in Christendom who
Speaker 4: authorized the translation and publication of the first Protestant version
Speaker 4: of the Bible into English. He came to the English
Speaker 4: throne in sixteen oh three, and quickly became unpopular because
Speaker 4: of his disgusting personal habits and his unsavory character. He
Speaker 4: pretended to be a scholar and theology and philosophy, but
Speaker 4: his learning was shallow and superficial. He wallowed in filth.
Speaker 1: I believe they're talking about king games there, aren't they?
Speaker 2: Yeah, pretty sure.
Speaker 4: Tomorrow and physical, but was endowed with a share of
Speaker 4: cunning that his associates called him called a kind of
Speaker 4: crooked wisdom. For his new edition of the Bible, he
Speaker 4: issued a set of personal rules the translators were to
Speaker 4: follow and ordered revisions to proceed, although he never contributed
Speaker 4: a farthing to its cost. Work began in sixteen oh seven.
Speaker 4: The translators handed over the revisers manuscripts of what is
Speaker 4: now called the King James Bible the King James, for
Speaker 4: his final personal approval. It was evident that James was
Speaker 4: not a competent to check their work and edit it,
Speaker 4: so he passed the manuscripts to a higher genius, to
Speaker 4: the greatest genius of all time, Sir Francis Bacon. I
Speaker 4: want to I added this particular passage because those who
Speaker 4: have checked out my book on Atlantis and have seen
Speaker 4: Atlantis alien visitation.
Speaker 2: The Atlantis alien visitation thing is taking away this idea
Speaker 2: of a cyclical civilization, mankind having a cyclical pattern of
Speaker 2: cataclysm and restarting right a reset, whether it's.
Speaker 1: Artificial, man made or natural, and probably a little bit
Speaker 1: of both depending on what we said.
Speaker 2: We're talking about, right, So to deny.
Speaker 1: A more highly advanced past, you have to insert aliens.
Speaker 1: That's just what these guys do, and I think this
Speaker 1: is a very new age of him.
Speaker 2: I also found a book of his that said something
Speaker 2: about the Fool. I'll tell you in a second.
Speaker 1: It's called Path of the Fool Michael the Syrian, and
Speaker 1: it is all about Tarot cards.
Speaker 2: So that should tell you something right.
Speaker 4: There, genetic manipulation, and the program in the series will
Speaker 4: know what I'm implying there by, Sir Francis Bacon and
Speaker 4: even will note this particular era, this particular date, the
Speaker 4: sixteen oh sevens, with the rise of the Tutors and
Speaker 4: their need to not only mind control the people under them,
Speaker 4: are also to create an empire. And well remember how
Speaker 4: many idioms that we associate with England come out of
Speaker 4: this particular era and how it is that so many changes,
Speaker 4: so many changes happened around the fifteenth sixteenth century, the Renaissance,
Speaker 4: with the coming of the Tutors, And how it was
Speaker 4: that just fifty one hundred years prior, the kings are
Speaker 4: shivering in windowless castles, shivering to death, and then all
Speaker 4: of a sudden, the enormous empires rise.
Speaker 1: He's saying that that's because of aliens, or maybe there
Speaker 1: were remnants of the past, or maybe he's not correct
Speaker 1: about his perception of the past. I don't think it
Speaker 1: was that dramatic of a thing transition.
Speaker 3: Now we have an important doctor.
Speaker 1: And by the way, he states that exactly from his
Speaker 1: the pages of his books, So he just said, there
Speaker 1: are is almost forbade him.
Speaker 2: What he wrote.
Speaker 3: Document an important.
Speaker 4: Period in Christianity at the time of Amster Emperor Constantine.
Speaker 4: We have a thing called the Donation of Constantine, which
Speaker 4: was the stamp of approval on Christianity.
Speaker 1: Not oh good, here, this is what they're talking about.
Speaker 1: This is the forgery here.
Speaker 4: The Emperor Constantine lived between two hundred and eight to
Speaker 4: three point thirty seven AD.
Speaker 3: After his vision he had a vision.
Speaker 1: Well, obviously he didn't live through that whole time, because
Speaker 1: that's a little bit long somewhere in between that ballpark.
Speaker 2: What the hell? Hold on?
Speaker 1: Hold on, yes, oh man, okay, all right, I'll be there.
Speaker 1: I'm running okay, right, all right, guys, I just got
Speaker 1: the word. So it's apparently starting sooner than we thought.
Speaker 1: They just decided to up and go with it. So
Speaker 1: I am going to end the stream now where am I.
Speaker 2: There?
Speaker 1: I am all right, So we'll pick up on this
Speaker 1: when I get back from Pharaoh's on a roll, all right,
Speaker 1: So we'll do that. As soon as I get back,
Speaker 1: I'll restart it. I'll throw out another link into the
Speaker 1: telegram group. Ballbusters Studios is the name of the telegram group, and.
Speaker 2: We'll continue on.
Speaker 1: We're right out a good part here too, so I'll
Speaker 1: get back and then then does man have to make
Speaker 1: some hot sauce?
Speaker 2: So we'll get this rocket and roll and asap.
Speaker 1: Thank you for coming in for the first part, and
Speaker 1: we will do the second very soon.