WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.199 --> 00:00:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Chapter fifteen, Part two of a short account of the

2
00:00:04.839 --> 00:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>history of mathematics. This is a LibriVox recording. All LibriVox

3
00:00:10.119 --> 00:00:13.679
<v Speaker 1>recordings are in the public domain. For more information or

4
00:00:13.720 --> 00:00:18.199
<v Speaker 1>to volunteer, please visit LibriVox dot org. This reading is

5
00:00:18.239 --> 00:00:20.920
<v Speaker 1>by Paul King p J K Dot scripts dot MI

6
00:00:20.960 --> 00:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I T dot e edu forward slash p K J. Pascal.

7
00:00:28.399 --> 00:00:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Among the contemporaries of Descartes, none displayed greater natural genius

8
00:00:33.880 --> 00:00:37.679
<v Speaker 1>than Pascal, But his reputation rests more on what he

9
00:00:37.799 --> 00:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>might have done than on what he actually affected, as

10
00:00:41.240 --> 00:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>during a considerable part of his life he deemed it

11
00:00:43.920 --> 00:00:48.200
<v Speaker 1>his duty to devote his whole time to religious exercises.

12
00:00:49.320 --> 00:00:54.079
<v Speaker 1>Blaise Pascal was born at Clermont on June nineteenth, sixteen

13
00:00:54.119 --> 00:00:58.719
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, and died at Paris on August nineteenth, sixteen

14
00:00:58.799 --> 00:01:03.119
<v Speaker 1>sixty two. His father, a local jucture at Claremont and

15
00:01:03.200 --> 00:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>himself of some scientific reputation, moved to Paris in sixteen

16
00:01:08.280 --> 00:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty one, partly to prosecute his own scientific studies, partly

17
00:01:13.640 --> 00:01:16.359
<v Speaker 1>to carry on the education of his only son, who

18
00:01:16.400 --> 00:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>had already displayed exceptional ability. Pascal was kept at home

19
00:01:21.560 --> 00:01:25.599
<v Speaker 1>in order to assure his not being overworked, and with

20
00:01:25.719 --> 00:01:29.079
<v Speaker 1>the same object, it was directed that his education should

21
00:01:29.120 --> 00:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>be at first confined to the study of languages, and

22
00:01:32.799 --> 00:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>should not include any mathematics. This naturally excited the boy's curiosity,

23
00:01:38.400 --> 00:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and one day, being then twelve years old, he asked

24
00:01:42.079 --> 00:01:46.599
<v Speaker 1>in what geometry consisted. His tutor replied that it was

25
00:01:46.680 --> 00:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the science of constructing exact figures and of determining the

26
00:01:51.719 --> 00:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>proportions between their different parts. Pascal, stimulated no doubt by

27
00:01:57.040 --> 00:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the injunction against reading, it, gave up his place to

28
00:02:00.640 --> 00:02:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the new study, and in a few weeks had discovered

29
00:02:03.359 --> 00:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>for himself many properties of figures, and in particular the

30
00:02:07.840 --> 00:02:10.719
<v Speaker 1>proposition that the sum of the angles of a triangle

31
00:02:11.280 --> 00:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>is equal to two right angles. I have read somewhere,

32
00:02:14.919 --> 00:02:17.879
<v Speaker 1>but I cannot lay my hand on the authority that

33
00:02:17.960 --> 00:02:21.319
<v Speaker 1>his proof merely consisted in turning the angular points of

34
00:02:21.360 --> 00:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a triangular piece of paper over so as to meet

35
00:02:24.719 --> 00:02:28.719
<v Speaker 1>in the center of the inscribed circle. A similar demonstration

36
00:02:28.919 --> 00:02:31.879
<v Speaker 1>can be got by turning the angular points over so

37
00:02:31.919 --> 00:02:34.879
<v Speaker 1>as to meet at the foot of the perpendicular drawn

38
00:02:34.919 --> 00:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>from the biggest angle to the opposite side. His father,

39
00:02:38.719 --> 00:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>struck by this display of ability gave him a copy

40
00:02:41.560 --> 00:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>of Euclid's Elements, a book which Pascal read with avidity

41
00:02:46.199 --> 00:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and soon mastered. At the age of fourteen, he was

42
00:02:51.560 --> 00:02:56.199
<v Speaker 1>admitted to the weekly meetings of Robervelle, Mersenne Midorge and

43
00:02:56.360 --> 00:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>other French geometricians, from which the French Academy he ultimately sprung,

44
00:03:01.639 --> 00:03:05.439
<v Speaker 1>being created by ordinance of Louis the fourteenth on December

45
00:03:05.479 --> 00:03:10.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty second, sixteen sixty six. At sixteen, Pascal wrote an

46
00:03:11.000 --> 00:03:14.599
<v Speaker 1>essay on conic sections, and in sixteen forty one, at

47
00:03:14.639 --> 00:03:18.479
<v Speaker 1>the age of eighteen, he constructed the first arithmetical machine,

48
00:03:18.919 --> 00:03:23.199
<v Speaker 1>an instrument which eight years later he further improved and patented.

49
00:03:24.000 --> 00:03:27.479
<v Speaker 1>His correspondence with Fermat About this time Shews that he

50
00:03:27.599 --> 00:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>was then turning his attention to analytical geometry and physics.

51
00:03:31.919 --> 00:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>He repeated Torcelli's experiments by which the pressure of the

52
00:03:35.879 --> 00:03:39.599
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere could be estimated as a weight, and he confirmed

53
00:03:39.639 --> 00:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>his theory of the cause of barometrical variations by obtaining

54
00:03:44.159 --> 00:03:47.439
<v Speaker 1>at the same instant readings at different altitudes on the

55
00:03:47.560 --> 00:03:52.199
<v Speaker 1>hill of Puis di Domme. In sixteen fifty, when in

56
00:03:52.240 --> 00:03:56.159
<v Speaker 1>the midst of these researches, Pascal suddenly abandoned his favorite

57
00:03:56.159 --> 00:03:59.599
<v Speaker 1>pursuits to study religion, or, as he says in his

58
00:03:59.680 --> 00:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Ponte Say, to contemplate the greatness and the misery of man.

59
00:04:04.599 --> 00:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>And about the same time he persuaded the younger of

60
00:04:07.159 --> 00:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>his two sisters to enter the port Royal Society. In

61
00:04:12.159 --> 00:04:15.919
<v Speaker 1>sixteen fifty three, he had to administer his father's estate.

62
00:04:17.319 --> 00:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>He now took up his old life again and made

63
00:04:20.319 --> 00:04:24.600
<v Speaker 1>several experiments on pressure exerted by gases and liquids. It

64
00:04:24.680 --> 00:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>was also about this period that he invented the arithmetical triangle,

65
00:04:29.000 --> 00:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and together with Framat, created the calculus of probabilities. He

66
00:04:34.439 --> 00:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>was meditating marriage when an accident again turned the current

67
00:04:38.240 --> 00:04:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of his thoughts to a religious life. He was driving

68
00:04:41.600 --> 00:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a foreign hand on November twenty third, sixteen fifty four,

69
00:04:45.800 --> 00:04:49.519
<v Speaker 1>when the horses ran away. The two leaders dashed over

70
00:04:49.560 --> 00:04:53.319
<v Speaker 1>the parapret of the bridge at Nui, and Pascal was

71
00:04:53.360 --> 00:04:57.879
<v Speaker 1>only saved by the traces. Breaking. Always somewhat of a mystic,

72
00:04:58.000 --> 00:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>he considered this a special summon to abandon the world.

73
00:05:02.279 --> 00:05:04.720
<v Speaker 1>He wrote an account of the accident on a small

74
00:05:04.759 --> 00:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>piece of parchment, which for the rest of his life

75
00:05:07.600 --> 00:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>he wore next to his heart to perpetually remind him

76
00:05:11.360 --> 00:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of his covenant, and shortly moved to Port Royal, where

77
00:05:15.040 --> 00:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>he continued to live until his death in sixteen sixty two.

78
00:05:19.279 --> 00:05:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Always delicate, he had injured his health by his incessant study.

79
00:05:23.759 --> 00:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>From the age of seventeen or eighteen, he suffered from insomnia,

80
00:05:27.240 --> 00:05:30.519
<v Speaker 1>an acute dyspepsia, and at the time of his death

81
00:05:30.839 --> 00:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>was completely worn out. His famous provincial letters directed against

82
00:05:36.720 --> 00:05:40.639
<v Speaker 1>the Jesuits and his Ponset were written towards the close

83
00:05:40.680 --> 00:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>of his life and are the first example of that

84
00:05:43.920 --> 00:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>finished form which is characteristic of the best French literature.

85
00:05:49.680 --> 00:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>The only mathematical work that he produced after retiring to

86
00:05:53.199 --> 00:05:57.399
<v Speaker 1>Port Royal was the Essay of the Cycloid in sixteen

87
00:05:57.480 --> 00:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight. He was suffering from leaplessness and a toothache

88
00:06:01.639 --> 00:06:04.639
<v Speaker 1>when the idea occurred to him, and to his surprise,

89
00:06:04.759 --> 00:06:08.839
<v Speaker 1>his teeth immediately ceased to ache. Regarding this as a

90
00:06:08.879 --> 00:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>divine intimation to proceed with the problem, he worked incessantly

91
00:06:13.600 --> 00:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>for eight days at it and completed a tolerably full

92
00:06:17.000 --> 00:06:21.319
<v Speaker 1>account of the geometry of the cycloid. I now proceed

93
00:06:21.360 --> 00:06:25.959
<v Speaker 1>to consider his mathematical works in rather greater detail. His

94
00:06:26.199 --> 00:06:29.639
<v Speaker 1>early essay of the geometry of conics, written in sixteen

95
00:06:29.720 --> 00:06:33.959
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine but not published until seventeen seventy nine, seems

96
00:06:33.959 --> 00:06:37.439
<v Speaker 1>to have been founded on the teachings of Derog. Two

97
00:06:37.519 --> 00:06:40.439
<v Speaker 1>of the results are important as well as interesting. The

98
00:06:40.480 --> 00:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>first of these is the theorem known now as Pascal's theorem,

99
00:06:45.240 --> 00:06:48.639
<v Speaker 1>namely that if a hexagon is inscribed in a conic,

100
00:06:49.160 --> 00:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the points of the intersection of the opposite sides will

101
00:06:52.279 --> 00:06:55.439
<v Speaker 1>lie in a straight line. The second, which is really

102
00:06:55.519 --> 00:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>due to Derague, is that if a quadrilateral be inscribed

103
00:06:59.560 --> 00:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>in a and a straight line be drawn cutting the

104
00:07:02.480 --> 00:07:05.759
<v Speaker 1>sides taken in order in the points abcn, d and

105
00:07:05.800 --> 00:07:11.199
<v Speaker 1>the conic in P and Q, then PA times pc

106
00:07:11.560 --> 00:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>over PD times pd equals Qa times QC over QB

107
00:07:17.199 --> 00:07:23.399
<v Speaker 1>times QD. Pascal's arithmetical triangle, known today as Pascal's triangle,

108
00:07:23.959 --> 00:07:27.399
<v Speaker 1>was written in sixteen fifty three but not printed until

109
00:07:27.480 --> 00:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>sixteen sixty five. The triangle is constructed as in the

110
00:07:32.160 --> 00:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>annexed figure. By the way, the annexed figure shows Pascal's

111
00:07:36.800 --> 00:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>triangle as being kind of on its side by today's standards,

112
00:07:41.879 --> 00:07:44.759
<v Speaker 1>A one at the apex, followed by a one to one,

113
00:07:45.279 --> 00:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and then in the third row one two to one,

114
00:07:48.000 --> 00:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and in the fourth row one three three one, and

115
00:07:50.680 --> 00:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in the fifth row one four six four one. So

116
00:07:54.720 --> 00:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>they will refer to these lines as diagonal lines. The

117
00:07:59.800 --> 00:08:03.879
<v Speaker 1>whole horizontal lines, the way they're depicted are one one one, one, one,

118
00:08:04.240 --> 00:08:07.439
<v Speaker 1>one two, three, four, five, one three six, ten, fifteen,

119
00:08:07.959 --> 00:08:11.399
<v Speaker 1>one four ten, twenty thirty five, and one five fifteen

120
00:08:11.480 --> 00:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty five, seventy. And they have that written in actual

121
00:08:17.319 --> 00:08:22.199
<v Speaker 1>rows and columns. So, taking the latter description, each horizontal

122
00:08:22.199 --> 00:08:24.639
<v Speaker 1>line being formed from the one above it by making

123
00:08:24.680 --> 00:08:27.199
<v Speaker 1>every number in it equal to the sum of those

124
00:08:27.240 --> 00:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>above it and to the left of it in the

125
00:08:29.600 --> 00:08:33.799
<v Speaker 1>row immediately above. For example, in the fourth line, twenty

126
00:08:34.519 --> 00:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is equal to one plus three plus six plus ten.

127
00:08:38.320 --> 00:08:42.519
<v Speaker 1>Then Pascal's arithmetical triangle to any required order is got

128
00:08:42.559 --> 00:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>by drawing a diagonal downwards from the right to left.

129
00:08:45.960 --> 00:08:49.039
<v Speaker 1>Is in the figure. The numbers are what are now

130
00:08:49.080 --> 00:08:53.159
<v Speaker 1>called the figure it numbers. Those in the first line

131
00:08:53.159 --> 00:08:55.279
<v Speaker 1>are called the numbers of the first order. Those in

132
00:08:55.320 --> 00:08:58.559
<v Speaker 1>the second line one, two, three, four, five, and so

133
00:08:58.679 --> 00:09:01.159
<v Speaker 1>on are called natural none numbers or numbers of the

134
00:09:01.240 --> 00:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>second order, those in the third line numbers of the

135
00:09:04.360 --> 00:09:08.679
<v Speaker 1>third order, and so on. It is easily shown that

136
00:09:08.759 --> 00:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the m number in the n th row is M

137
00:09:12.039 --> 00:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>plus n minus two factorial divided by m minus one

138
00:09:16.279 --> 00:09:21.279
<v Speaker 1>factorial times n minus one factorial. The numbers in any

139
00:09:21.320 --> 00:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>diagonal give the coefficients of the expansion of a binomial.

140
00:09:25.559 --> 00:09:31.159
<v Speaker 1>For example, the figures in the fifth diagonal, namely one, four, six,

141
00:09:31.200 --> 00:09:34.799
<v Speaker 1>four one, are the coefficients in the expansion of a

142
00:09:35.000 --> 00:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>plus b raised to the power four. Pascal use the

143
00:09:39.039 --> 00:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>triangle partly for this purpose, and partly to find the

144
00:09:42.919 --> 00:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>numbers of combinations of m things taken n at a time,

145
00:09:47.200 --> 00:09:50.759
<v Speaker 1>which you stated correctly to be n plus one times

146
00:09:50.879 --> 00:09:53.559
<v Speaker 1>n plus two times n plus three dot dot dot

147
00:09:53.720 --> 00:09:59.399
<v Speaker 1>times m divided by m minus n factorial. Perhaps as

148
00:09:59.440 --> 00:10:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a mathematic Pascal is best known in connection with his

149
00:10:02.960 --> 00:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>correspondence with Fermont in sixteen fifteen four, in which he

150
00:10:07.600 --> 00:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>laid down the principles of the theory of probabilities. This

151
00:10:11.559 --> 00:10:15.639
<v Speaker 1>correspondence arose from a problem proposed by a gamester, the

152
00:10:15.759 --> 00:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Chevalier de Maire, to Pascal, who communicated it to Fermat.

153
00:10:21.120 --> 00:10:25.039
<v Speaker 1>The problem was this, two players of equal skill want

154
00:10:25.120 --> 00:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to leave the table before finishing the game. Their scores

155
00:10:29.480 --> 00:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and the number of points which constitute the game being given,

156
00:10:33.360 --> 00:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>it is desired to find in what proportion should they

157
00:10:36.639 --> 00:10:41.080
<v Speaker 1>divide the stakes. Pascal and Fermat agreed on the answer,

158
00:10:41.159 --> 00:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>but gave different proofs. The following is a translation of

159
00:10:45.159 --> 00:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Pascal's solution. That of Fermat is given later. The following

160
00:10:50.720 --> 00:10:54.039
<v Speaker 1>is my method for determining the share of each player. When,

161
00:10:54.120 --> 00:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>for example, two players play a game of three points

162
00:10:57.480 --> 00:11:02.279
<v Speaker 1>and each player has staked thirty two piece fo suppose

163
00:11:02.320 --> 00:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that the first player had gained two points and then

164
00:11:05.639 --> 00:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the second player one point. They now have to play

165
00:11:09.519 --> 00:11:12.679
<v Speaker 1>for a point on this condition that if the first

166
00:11:12.679 --> 00:11:15.559
<v Speaker 1>player gain, he takes all the money which is at stake,

167
00:11:15.679 --> 00:11:19.679
<v Speaker 1>namely sixty four pietols, while if the second player gain,

168
00:11:19.759 --> 00:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>each player has two points, so that they are on

169
00:11:22.720 --> 00:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>terms of equality, and if they leave off playing, each

170
00:11:27.360 --> 00:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>ought to take thirty two piecetoles. Thus, if the first

171
00:11:31.240 --> 00:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>player gain, then sixty four pistoles belonged to him, and

172
00:11:34.919 --> 00:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>if he loses, then thirty two piecetoles belong to him.

173
00:11:40.000 --> 00:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>If therefore, the players do not wish to play this game,

174
00:11:43.000 --> 00:11:46.519
<v Speaker 1>but to separate without playing it. The first player would

175
00:11:46.559 --> 00:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>say to the second I am certain of thirty two

176
00:11:49.639 --> 00:11:53.039
<v Speaker 1>piece stoles, even if I lose this game, and for

177
00:11:53.120 --> 00:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the other thirty two piece stoles, perhaps I shall have them,

178
00:11:56.399 --> 00:11:59.799
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps you will have them. The chances are equal.

179
00:12:00.639 --> 00:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Let us divide these thirty two pistoles equally and give

180
00:12:03.879 --> 00:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>me also the thirty two pistoles of which I am certain.

181
00:12:08.240 --> 00:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Thus the first player will have forty eight pistoles in

182
00:12:11.039 --> 00:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the second sixteen pistoles. Next, suppose that the first player

183
00:12:16.440 --> 00:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>has gained two points in the second player none, and

184
00:12:19.960 --> 00:12:22.879
<v Speaker 1>they are about to play for a point. The condition

185
00:12:23.080 --> 00:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>is that if the first player gain this point, he

186
00:12:25.519 --> 00:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>secures the game and takes sixty four pistols, And if

187
00:12:29.320 --> 00:12:32.039
<v Speaker 1>the second player gain this point, then the players will

188
00:12:32.039 --> 00:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>be in the situation already examined, in which the first

189
00:12:36.120 --> 00:12:39.039
<v Speaker 1>player is entitled the forty eight pistoles and the second

190
00:12:39.120 --> 00:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to sixteen pistos. Thus, if they do not wish to play,

191
00:12:43.440 --> 00:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the first player would say to the second if I

192
00:12:46.320 --> 00:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>gain this point, I gain sixty four pistos. If I

193
00:12:49.679 --> 00:12:53.639
<v Speaker 1>lose it, I am titled to forty eight pistos. Give

194
00:12:53.679 --> 00:12:56.399
<v Speaker 1>me then the forty eight pistoles of which I am certain,

195
00:12:56.480 --> 00:12:59.799
<v Speaker 1>and divide the other sixteen. Since our chances of gaining

196
00:12:59.840 --> 00:13:03.399
<v Speaker 1>the point are equal. Thus the first player will have

197
00:13:03.480 --> 00:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty six pistoles and the second player eight pistos. Finally,

198
00:13:08.879 --> 00:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>suppose that the first player had gained one point and

199
00:13:12.039 --> 00:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the second player none. If they proceed to play for

200
00:13:15.559 --> 00:13:18.639
<v Speaker 1>a point, the condition is that if the first player

201
00:13:18.759 --> 00:13:22.879
<v Speaker 1>gain it, the players will be in the situation first examined,

202
00:13:23.320 --> 00:13:26.799
<v Speaker 1>in which the first player is entitled to fifty six pistos.

203
00:13:27.519 --> 00:13:30.639
<v Speaker 1>If the first player lose the point, each player has

204
00:13:30.720 --> 00:13:34.759
<v Speaker 1>then a point, and each is entitled to thirty two pistoles.

205
00:13:35.399 --> 00:13:38.399
<v Speaker 1>Give me the thirty two pistoles of which I am certain,

206
00:13:38.559 --> 00:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and divide the remainder of the fifty six pistoles equally,

207
00:13:42.639 --> 00:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that is, divide the twenty four pistoles equally. Thus the

208
00:13:47.879 --> 00:13:50.639
<v Speaker 1>first player will have the sum of thirty two and

209
00:13:50.799 --> 00:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>twelve pistoles, that is, forty four pistoles, and consequently the

210
00:13:55.200 --> 00:14:01.399
<v Speaker 1>second will have twenty pistoles. Pascal proceeds next to consider

211
00:14:01.480 --> 00:14:04.919
<v Speaker 1>the similar problem when the game is won by whomever

212
00:14:05.440 --> 00:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>first obtains M plus en points, and one player has

213
00:14:09.879 --> 00:14:13.639
<v Speaker 1>m while the other has end points. The answer is

214
00:14:13.679 --> 00:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>obtained by using the arithmetical triangle or Pascal's triangle. The

215
00:14:20.399 --> 00:14:24.559
<v Speaker 1>general solution, in which the skill of the players is unequal,

216
00:14:24.679 --> 00:14:28.279
<v Speaker 1>is given in many modern textbooks on algebra, and agrees

217
00:14:28.360 --> 00:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>with Pascal's result, though of course the notation of the

218
00:14:32.200 --> 00:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>latter is different and less convenient. Pascal made a most

219
00:14:36.960 --> 00:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>illegitimate use of the new theory in the seventh chapter

220
00:14:40.240 --> 00:14:44.759
<v Speaker 1>of his Ponce. He practically puts his argument that, as

221
00:14:44.799 --> 00:14:48.799
<v Speaker 1>the value of eternal happiness must be infinite, then even

222
00:14:48.840 --> 00:14:52.919
<v Speaker 1>if the probability of a religious life ensuring eternal happiness

223
00:14:52.919 --> 00:14:56.919
<v Speaker 1>be very small, still the expectation, which is measured by

224
00:14:56.960 --> 00:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the product of the two must be of sufficient MEAs

225
00:15:00.000 --> 00:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>magnitude to make it worth while to be religious. The argument,

226
00:15:05.480 --> 00:15:09.559
<v Speaker 1>if worth anything, would apply equally to any religion which

227
00:15:09.559 --> 00:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>has promised eternal happiness to those who accepted its doctrines.

228
00:15:14.159 --> 00:15:17.519
<v Speaker 1>If any conclusion may be drawn from the statement, it

229
00:15:17.600 --> 00:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is the undesirability of applying mathematics to questions of morality,

230
00:15:22.480 --> 00:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of which some of the data are necessarily outside the

231
00:15:25.799 --> 00:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>range of an exact science. It is only fair to

232
00:15:29.840 --> 00:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>add that no one had more contempt than Pascal for

233
00:15:34.519 --> 00:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>those who changed their opinions according to the prospect of

234
00:15:38.399 --> 00:15:43.759
<v Speaker 1>material benefit, and this isolated passage is at variance with

235
00:15:43.840 --> 00:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the spirit of his writings. The last mathematical work of

236
00:15:48.559 --> 00:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Pascal was that on the Cycloid of sixteen fifty eight.

237
00:15:52.600 --> 00:15:55.399
<v Speaker 1>The cycloid is the curve traced out by the point

238
00:15:55.480 --> 00:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>on the circumference of a circular hoop which rolls along

239
00:15:58.480 --> 00:16:02.759
<v Speaker 1>a straight line. Galileo in sixteen thirty had been the

240
00:16:02.799 --> 00:16:06.559
<v Speaker 1>first to call attention to this curve, and had suggested

241
00:16:06.879 --> 00:16:09.759
<v Speaker 1>that the arches of bridges should be built in the

242
00:16:09.759 --> 00:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>form of it. It is a graceful curve, but the

243
00:16:13.480 --> 00:16:17.039
<v Speaker 1>only bridge with a cycloidal arch of which I have

244
00:16:17.200 --> 00:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>heard is the one built by Essex in the grounds

245
00:16:20.120 --> 00:16:24.519
<v Speaker 1>of Trinity College at Cambridge. Four years later, in sixteen

246
00:16:24.559 --> 00:16:29.879
<v Speaker 1>thirty four, Roberval found the area of the cycloid. Descartes

247
00:16:29.960 --> 00:16:33.399
<v Speaker 1>thought little of this solution and defied him to find

248
00:16:33.440 --> 00:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>its tangents, the same challenge also being sent to Fermont,

249
00:16:37.720 --> 00:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>who at once solved the problem. Several questions connected with

250
00:16:42.480 --> 00:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the curve and with the surface and volume generated by

251
00:16:45.759 --> 00:16:49.159
<v Speaker 1>its revolution, about its axis base or the tangent at

252
00:16:49.159 --> 00:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>its vertex, were then proposed by various mathematicians. These and

253
00:16:54.840 --> 00:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>some analogous questions, as well as the positions of the

254
00:16:58.159 --> 00:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>centers of mass of the solids there formed, were solved

255
00:17:02.080 --> 00:17:05.640
<v Speaker 1>by Pascal in sixteen fifty eight, and the results were

256
00:17:05.680 --> 00:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>issued as a challenge to the world. Wallace succeeded in

257
00:17:10.039 --> 00:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>solving all the questions except those connected with the center

258
00:17:13.559 --> 00:17:18.160
<v Speaker 1>of mass. Pascal's own solutions were affected by the method

259
00:17:18.160 --> 00:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of indivisibles, and are similar to those which a modern

260
00:17:21.480 --> 00:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>mathematician would give. By the aid of the integral calculus.

261
00:17:26.119 --> 00:17:30.519
<v Speaker 1>He obtained by summation what are equivalent to the following integrals,

262
00:17:31.240 --> 00:17:36.839
<v Speaker 1>the integral of sign phi de phi, also the integral

263
00:17:36.960 --> 00:17:40.839
<v Speaker 1>of sign squared phi de phi, and also the integral

264
00:17:41.200 --> 00:17:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of Phi times sign phi d phi, one limit being

265
00:17:46.960 --> 00:17:51.920
<v Speaker 1>either zero or half Pi. He also investigated the geometry

266
00:17:51.960 --> 00:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>of the Archimedean spiral. These researches, according to de Lambert,

267
00:17:56.599 --> 00:18:00.599
<v Speaker 1>form a connecting link between the geometry of archimytes and

268
00:18:00.640 --> 00:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the infinitesimal calculus of Newton Wallace. John Wallace was born

269
00:18:08.039 --> 00:18:12.079
<v Speaker 1>at Ashford on November twenty second, sixteen sixteen, and died

270
00:18:12.119 --> 00:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>ah Oxford on October twenty eighth seventeen o three, when

271
00:18:17.240 --> 00:18:19.559
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years old, he happened to see a book on

272
00:18:19.640 --> 00:18:23.799
<v Speaker 1>arithmetic in the hands of his brother. Struck with curiosity

273
00:18:23.880 --> 00:18:26.759
<v Speaker 1>at the odd signs and symbols in it, he borrowed

274
00:18:26.799 --> 00:18:31.039
<v Speaker 1>the book and in a fortnight mastered the subject. It

275
00:18:31.160 --> 00:18:33.799
<v Speaker 1>was intended that he should be a doctor, and he

276
00:18:33.920 --> 00:18:37.799
<v Speaker 1>was sent to Emmanuel College, Cambridge. While there he kept

277
00:18:37.839 --> 00:18:41.160
<v Speaker 1>an act on the doctrine of the circulation of the blood.

278
00:18:41.759 --> 00:18:44.200
<v Speaker 1>This is said to have been the first occasion in

279
00:18:44.279 --> 00:18:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Europe on which this theory was publicly maintained in disputation.

280
00:18:50.839 --> 00:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>His interests, however, centered on mathematics. He was elected to

281
00:18:55.519 --> 00:18:59.799
<v Speaker 1>a fellowship at Queen's College, Cambridge and subsequently took orders,

282
00:19:00.279 --> 00:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>but on the whole adhered to the Puritan Party, whom

283
00:19:04.039 --> 00:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>he rendered great assistance in deciphering the Royalist despatches. He however,

284
00:19:09.359 --> 00:19:13.319
<v Speaker 1>joined the Moderate Presbyterians in signing the Remonstrance against the

285
00:19:13.359 --> 00:19:17.519
<v Speaker 1>Execution of Charles the First, by which he incurred the

286
00:19:17.599 --> 00:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>lasting hostility of the Independence. In spite of their opposition,

287
00:19:23.720 --> 00:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>he was appointed in sixteen forty nine to the civilian

288
00:19:27.119 --> 00:19:30.880
<v Speaker 1>chair of Geometry at Oxford, where he lived until his

289
00:19:31.039 --> 00:19:36.279
<v Speaker 1>death on October twenty eighth, seventeen o three. Besides his

290
00:19:36.440 --> 00:19:41.559
<v Speaker 1>mathematical works, he wrote on theology, logic, and philosophy, and

291
00:19:41.720 --> 00:19:44.880
<v Speaker 1>was the first to devise a system for teaching deaf mutes.

292
00:19:45.559 --> 00:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I confine myself to a few notes on his more

293
00:19:48.440 --> 00:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>important mathematical writings. They are notable partly for the introduction

294
00:19:53.440 --> 00:19:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of the use of infinite series as an ordinary part

295
00:19:56.400 --> 00:19:59.799
<v Speaker 1>of analysis, and partly for the fact that they revealed,

296
00:20:00.160 --> 00:20:04.039
<v Speaker 1>explained to all students the principles of those new methods

297
00:20:04.079 --> 00:20:09.599
<v Speaker 1>which distinguish modern from classical mathematics. The most important of

298
00:20:09.680 --> 00:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Wallace's works was his Arithmetica Infinitorum, which was published in

299
00:20:15.799 --> 00:20:20.079
<v Speaker 1>sixteen fifty six. In this treatise, the methods of analysis

300
00:20:20.119 --> 00:20:25.599
<v Speaker 1>of Descartes and Cavalieri were systematized and greatly extended, but

301
00:20:25.680 --> 00:20:30.079
<v Speaker 1>their logical exposition is open to criticism. It at once

302
00:20:30.160 --> 00:20:33.119
<v Speaker 1>became the standard book on the subject, and is constantly

303
00:20:33.160 --> 00:20:36.799
<v Speaker 1>referred to by subsequent writers. It is prefaced by a

304
00:20:36.839 --> 00:20:41.359
<v Speaker 1>short tract on conic sections, which was subsequently expanded into

305
00:20:41.519 --> 00:20:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a separate treatise. He commences by proving the law of

306
00:20:45.680 --> 00:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>indices chews that X to the zero x to the

307
00:20:49.440 --> 00:20:53.160
<v Speaker 1>minus one, x to the minus two, and so on

308
00:20:53.319 --> 00:20:56.799
<v Speaker 1>represent one one over x, one over x squared, and

309
00:20:56.960 --> 00:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>so on. That x to the power of one half

310
00:21:00.279 --> 00:21:03.799
<v Speaker 1>represents the square root of X, that x to the

311
00:21:03.839 --> 00:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>power of two thirds represents the qb root of x squared,

312
00:21:08.000 --> 00:21:12.319
<v Speaker 1>and that generally that x to the exponent minus n

313
00:21:12.440 --> 00:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>represents the reciprocal of x to the power n, and

314
00:21:16.000 --> 00:21:18.599
<v Speaker 1>that x to the p over q represents the q

315
00:21:18.839 --> 00:21:22.279
<v Speaker 1>th root of x to the p. Leaving the numerous

316
00:21:22.319 --> 00:21:27.559
<v Speaker 1>algebraical applications of this discovery, he next proceeds defined by

317
00:21:27.559 --> 00:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>the method of indivisibles, the area inclosed between the curve

318
00:21:32.400 --> 00:21:34.960
<v Speaker 1>y equals x to the m the axis of x

319
00:21:35.759 --> 00:21:39.119
<v Speaker 1>and any ordinate x equals h, and he proves that

320
00:21:39.160 --> 00:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the ratio of this area is equal to that of

321
00:21:42.759 --> 00:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>the parallelogram on the same base and of the same altitude,

322
00:21:46.440 --> 00:21:49.839
<v Speaker 1>and is equal to the ratio one over M plus one.

323
00:21:51.440 --> 00:21:54.279
<v Speaker 1>He apparently assumed that the same result would be true

324
00:21:54.400 --> 00:21:57.279
<v Speaker 1>also for the curve y equals a, x rays to

325
00:21:57.319 --> 00:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the power m, where A is any constant an n

326
00:22:00.119 --> 00:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>m is any number positive or negative. But he only

327
00:22:03.279 --> 00:22:07.599
<v Speaker 1>discusses the case of which the parabola of m equals two,

328
00:22:08.400 --> 00:22:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and that of the hyperbola in which m equals minus one.

329
00:22:13.559 --> 00:22:17.119
<v Speaker 1>In the latter case, his interpretation of the result is incorrect.

330
00:22:17.880 --> 00:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>He then chows that similar results might be written down

331
00:22:21.079 --> 00:22:24.160
<v Speaker 1>for any curve of the form Y equals the sum

332
00:22:24.880 --> 00:22:29.079
<v Speaker 1>of a x rays to the power m, and hence

333
00:22:29.279 --> 00:22:32.440
<v Speaker 1>that if the ordinate Y on a curve can be

334
00:22:32.519 --> 00:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>expanded in powers of the obsisa x, its quadrature can

335
00:22:37.000 --> 00:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>be determined. Thus, he said that if the equation of

336
00:22:40.400 --> 00:22:43.079
<v Speaker 1>a curve where y equals x to the zero plus

337
00:22:43.200 --> 00:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>x to the one plus x squared, and so on,

338
00:22:45.880 --> 00:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>its area would be x plus one half x squared

339
00:22:49.240 --> 00:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>plus one third x cubed, and so on. He then

340
00:22:53.480 --> 00:22:57.519
<v Speaker 1>applies this to the quadrature of the curves. Y equals

341
00:22:57.599 --> 00:23:01.640
<v Speaker 1>quantity x minus x squared to the power zero. Y

342
00:23:01.799 --> 00:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>equals the quantity x minus x squared to the power one.

343
00:23:06.480 --> 00:23:11.319
<v Speaker 1>Y equals x minus x squared quantity to the power two,

344
00:23:12.519 --> 00:23:15.759
<v Speaker 1>Y equals the quantity x minus x square to the

345
00:23:15.799 --> 00:23:18.799
<v Speaker 1>power three, and so on. Taken between the limits x

346
00:23:18.839 --> 00:23:21.799
<v Speaker 1>equals zero and x equals one, and shows that the

347
00:23:21.839 --> 00:23:27.319
<v Speaker 1>areas are respectively one one over six, one over thirty

348
00:23:27.720 --> 00:23:31.599
<v Speaker 1>one over one, forty, and so on. He next considers

349
00:23:31.640 --> 00:23:35.039
<v Speaker 1>the curve of the form y equals x to the

350
00:23:35.079 --> 00:23:38.599
<v Speaker 1>power one over M, and establishes the theorem that the

351
00:23:38.640 --> 00:23:41.920
<v Speaker 1>area bounded by the curve the axis of x and

352
00:23:41.960 --> 00:23:44.759
<v Speaker 1>the ordinate x equals one is to the area of

353
00:23:44.799 --> 00:23:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the rectangle on the same base and the same altitude

354
00:23:47.920 --> 00:23:52.119
<v Speaker 1>as M over M plus one. This is equivalent of

355
00:23:52.200 --> 00:23:56.319
<v Speaker 1>finding the value of the integral from zero to one

356
00:23:56.880 --> 00:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of x rays to the power one over md x.

357
00:24:00.759 --> 00:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>He illustrates this by the parabola in which M equals two.

358
00:24:05.039 --> 00:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>He states, but does not prove, that the corresponding result

359
00:24:08.240 --> 00:24:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of the curve of the form y equals x rays

360
00:24:11.000 --> 00:24:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to the p over q. This work contains also one

361
00:24:14.480 --> 00:24:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of the earliest investigations of the formation and properties of

362
00:24:17.960 --> 00:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>continued fractions, a discussion that was suggested by Bruckner's use

363
00:24:24.079 --> 00:24:29.119
<v Speaker 1>of these fractions. Wallace shewed considerable ingenuity in reducing the

364
00:24:29.200 --> 00:24:32.119
<v Speaker 1>equations of curves to the forms given above, but as

365
00:24:32.160 --> 00:24:35.279
<v Speaker 1>he was unacquainted with the binomial theorem, he could not

366
00:24:35.319 --> 00:24:38.599
<v Speaker 1>affect the quadrature of the circle whose equation is y

367
00:24:38.799 --> 00:24:42.880
<v Speaker 1>equals quantity x minus x square to the half. Since

368
00:24:42.920 --> 00:24:45.880
<v Speaker 1>he was unable to expand this in powers of x,

369
00:24:46.519 --> 00:24:51.680
<v Speaker 1>he laid down. However, the principle of interpolation. Thus, as

370
00:24:51.720 --> 00:24:54.599
<v Speaker 1>the ordinate of the circle y equals x minus x

371
00:24:54.640 --> 00:24:59.279
<v Speaker 1>squared raised to the half, is a geometrical mean between

372
00:24:59.359 --> 00:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the ordinate of the curve y equals quantity x minus

373
00:25:03.480 --> 00:25:07.039
<v Speaker 1>x squared rays to the zero, and y equals quantity

374
00:25:07.200 --> 00:25:09.839
<v Speaker 1>x minus x squared rays to the one. It might

375
00:25:09.880 --> 00:25:13.599
<v Speaker 1>be supposed that, as an approximation the area of the semicircle,

376
00:25:14.039 --> 00:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>the integral from zero to one of quantity x minus

377
00:25:17.240 --> 00:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>x squared dx, which is one eighth Pi, might be

378
00:25:21.279 --> 00:25:24.279
<v Speaker 1>taken as the geometrical mean between the values of the

379
00:25:24.319 --> 00:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>integral from zero to one of quantity x minus x

380
00:25:27.480 --> 00:25:31.920
<v Speaker 1>squared rays to the zero dx, and the integral of

381
00:25:32.079 --> 00:25:36.279
<v Speaker 1>zero to one of quantity x minus x squared rays

382
00:25:36.319 --> 00:25:39.319
<v Speaker 1>to the one dx. That is, the values one and

383
00:25:39.519 --> 00:25:44.039
<v Speaker 1>one sixth. This is equivalent to taking four multiplied by

384
00:25:44.039 --> 00:25:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the root of two thirds or three point two six

385
00:25:47.920 --> 00:25:53.359
<v Speaker 1>approximately as the value of pi. But Wallace argued, we

386
00:25:53.480 --> 00:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>have in fact a series one one sixth one over thirty,

387
00:25:57.240 --> 00:26:00.039
<v Speaker 1>one over one forty and so on, and therefore the

388
00:26:00.160 --> 00:26:03.599
<v Speaker 1>term interpolated between one and one sixth ought to be

389
00:26:03.720 --> 00:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>so chosen as to obey the law of the series. This,

390
00:26:07.920 --> 00:26:11.279
<v Speaker 1>by an elaborate method which I need not describe in detail,

391
00:26:12.119 --> 00:26:15.039
<v Speaker 1>leads to a value for the interpolated term, which is

392
00:26:15.119 --> 00:26:22.039
<v Speaker 1>equivalent to taking pie equals two times two over one

393
00:26:22.160 --> 00:26:25.920
<v Speaker 1>times two thirds times four thirds times four fifths times six,

394
00:26:26.039 --> 00:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>fifth times six over seven times eight over seven times

395
00:26:28.960 --> 00:26:34.880
<v Speaker 1>eight over nine, and so on. The subsequent mathematicians of

396
00:26:34.920 --> 00:26:40.839
<v Speaker 1>the seventeenth century constantly used interpolation to obtain results which

397
00:26:40.880 --> 00:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>we should attempt to obtain by direct analysis. A few

398
00:26:45.039 --> 00:26:49.160
<v Speaker 1>years later, in sixteen fifty nine, Wallace published a tract

399
00:26:49.839 --> 00:26:53.599
<v Speaker 1>containing the solution of the problems on the cycloid which

400
00:26:53.599 --> 00:26:58.640
<v Speaker 1>had been proposed by Pascal. In this he incidentally explained

401
00:26:58.720 --> 00:27:03.319
<v Speaker 1>how the principles laid down in his Arithmetica Infinitorum could

402
00:27:03.359 --> 00:27:07.400
<v Speaker 1>be used for the rectification of algebraic curves, and gave

403
00:27:07.440 --> 00:27:10.599
<v Speaker 1>a solution of the problem to rectify the semi cubic

404
00:27:10.720 --> 00:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>parabola ex cubed equals ayz squared, which had been discovered

405
00:27:15.720 --> 00:27:20.559
<v Speaker 1>in sixteen fifty seven by his pupil, William Neel. This

406
00:27:20.759 --> 00:27:22.799
<v Speaker 1>was the first case in which the length of a

407
00:27:22.880 --> 00:27:27.119
<v Speaker 1>curved line was determined by mathematics, and since all attempts

408
00:27:27.160 --> 00:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>to rectify the ellipse in the hyperbolea had been necessarily ineffectual,

409
00:27:32.200 --> 00:27:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it had been previously supposed that no curves could be rectified,

410
00:27:36.160 --> 00:27:39.400
<v Speaker 1>as indeed Descartes had definitely asserted to be the case.

411
00:27:40.480 --> 00:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>The cycloid was a second curve rectified, and this was

412
00:27:43.960 --> 00:27:47.880
<v Speaker 1>done by Wren in sixteen fifty eight. Early in sixteen

413
00:27:47.960 --> 00:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight, a similar discovery, independent at that of Nile,

414
00:27:52.559 --> 00:27:56.319
<v Speaker 1>was made by Van Harat, and this was published by

415
00:27:56.440 --> 00:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Van Schutten in his edition of Descartes metric in sixteen

416
00:28:01.440 --> 00:28:06.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine. Van Heret's method is as follows. He supposes

417
00:28:06.759 --> 00:28:10.599
<v Speaker 1>the curve to be referred to rectangular axes. If this

418
00:28:10.680 --> 00:28:13.319
<v Speaker 1>be so, and if x y be the coordinates of

419
00:28:13.359 --> 00:28:16.319
<v Speaker 1>any point on it and end the length of the normal,

420
00:28:16.400 --> 00:28:19.599
<v Speaker 1>and if another point whose coordinates are x new to

421
00:28:19.640 --> 00:28:23.880
<v Speaker 1>be taken such that new to h equals the ratio

422
00:28:24.079 --> 00:28:28.000
<v Speaker 1>N to y, where h is a constant, then if

423
00:28:28.119 --> 00:28:31.279
<v Speaker 1>ds be the element of the length of the required curve,

424
00:28:31.960 --> 00:28:35.039
<v Speaker 1>then we have by similar triangles the ratio d s

425
00:28:35.160 --> 00:28:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to dx equals nd to y. Therefore hds equals new dx. Hence,

426
00:28:43.759 --> 00:28:46.119
<v Speaker 1>if the area of the locus of the point x

427
00:28:46.240 --> 00:28:49.519
<v Speaker 1>new can be found, the first curve can be rectified.

428
00:28:50.079 --> 00:28:53.480
<v Speaker 1>In this way. Van Herat affected the rectification of the

429
00:28:53.519 --> 00:28:57.039
<v Speaker 1>curve yqubed equals a X squared, and added that the

430
00:28:57.079 --> 00:29:01.279
<v Speaker 1>rectification of the parabola y squared equals as is impossible

431
00:29:01.799 --> 00:29:06.119
<v Speaker 1>since it requires the quadrature of the hyperbola. The solutions

432
00:29:06.160 --> 00:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>given by Nile and Wallace are somewhat similar to that

433
00:29:09.119 --> 00:29:12.519
<v Speaker 1>given by Van Herret, but no general rules enunciated, and

434
00:29:12.599 --> 00:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the analysis is clumsy. A third method was suggested by

435
00:29:17.279 --> 00:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>fermat in sixteen sixty, but it is both inelegant and laborious.

436
00:29:23.160 --> 00:29:27.839
<v Speaker 1>In sixteen sixty five, Wallace published the first systematic Treatise

437
00:29:27.920 --> 00:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>on Analytical conic sections. I have already mentioned that the

438
00:29:32.480 --> 00:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>geometrie of Descartes is both difficult and obscure, and to

439
00:29:37.319 --> 00:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>many of his contemporaries, to whom the method was new,

440
00:29:41.079 --> 00:29:45.839
<v Speaker 1>it must have been incomprehensible. Wallace made the method intelligible

441
00:29:45.880 --> 00:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to all mathematicians. This is the earliest book in which

442
00:29:49.880 --> 00:29:53.079
<v Speaker 1>these curves are considered and defined as curves of the

443
00:29:53.160 --> 00:29:56.519
<v Speaker 1>second degree and not as sections of a cone on

444
00:29:56.599 --> 00:30:00.519
<v Speaker 1>a circular base. The theory of the col collision of

445
00:30:00.559 --> 00:30:04.279
<v Speaker 1>bodies was propounded by the Royal Society in sixteen sixty

446
00:30:04.319 --> 00:30:09.960
<v Speaker 1>eight for the consideration of mathematicians. Wallace, Wren, and Huygens

447
00:30:10.000 --> 00:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>sent correct and similar solutions, all depending on what is

448
00:30:13.960 --> 00:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>now called the conservation of momentum. But while Ren and

449
00:30:18.519 --> 00:30:23.759
<v Speaker 1>Huygens confine their theory to perfectly elastic bodies, Wallace considered

450
00:30:23.880 --> 00:30:29.039
<v Speaker 1>also imperfectly elastic bodies. This was followed in sixteen sixty

451
00:30:29.119 --> 00:30:32.960
<v Speaker 1>nine by a work on statics centers of gravity, and

452
00:30:33.079 --> 00:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>in sixteen seventy by one on dynamics. These provide a

453
00:30:37.759 --> 00:30:40.920
<v Speaker 1>convenient synopsis of what was then known on the subject.

454
00:30:42.079 --> 00:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>In sixteen eighty five Wallace published in Algebra, preceded by

455
00:30:46.680 --> 00:30:50.079
<v Speaker 1>historical account of the development of the subject, which contains

456
00:30:50.119 --> 00:30:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a great deal of valuable information. The second edition, issued

457
00:30:55.000 --> 00:30:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in sixteen ninety three, in forming the second volume of

458
00:30:58.000 --> 00:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>his opera, is considerably enlarged. This algebra is noteworthy as

459
00:31:03.519 --> 00:31:08.359
<v Speaker 1>containing the first systematic use of formulae. A given magnitude

460
00:31:08.440 --> 00:31:12.799
<v Speaker 1>is here represented by the numerical ratio, which it bears

461
00:31:12.880 --> 00:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to the unit of the same kind of magnitude. Thus,

462
00:31:16.720 --> 00:31:20.039
<v Speaker 1>when Wallace wants to compare two lengths, he regards each

463
00:31:20.079 --> 00:31:24.759
<v Speaker 1>as containing so many units of length. This perhaps will

464
00:31:24.759 --> 00:31:27.720
<v Speaker 1>be made clearer if I say that the relation between

465
00:31:27.759 --> 00:31:31.119
<v Speaker 1>the space described in any time by a particle moving

466
00:31:31.160 --> 00:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>with uniform velocity would be denoted by Wallace by the

467
00:31:35.079 --> 00:31:39.559
<v Speaker 1>formula S equals vt, where s is the number representing

468
00:31:39.640 --> 00:31:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the ratio of the space described to the unit of length,

469
00:31:44.160 --> 00:31:48.319
<v Speaker 1>while previous writers would have denoted the same relation by

470
00:31:48.359 --> 00:31:52.680
<v Speaker 1>stating what is equivalent to the proportion S one over

471
00:31:52.880 --> 00:31:56.039
<v Speaker 1>s two equals v one T one over v two

472
00:31:56.119 --> 00:32:01.559
<v Speaker 1>T two c for example, Newton's Principia Bookie one, Section one,

473
00:32:01.720 --> 00:32:05.519
<v Speaker 1>Lemma ten or eleven. It is curious to note that

474
00:32:05.559 --> 00:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Wallace rejected as absurd the now usual idea of a

475
00:32:09.920 --> 00:32:14.000
<v Speaker 1>negative number as being less than nothing, but accepted the

476
00:32:14.119 --> 00:32:18.680
<v Speaker 1>view that it is something greater than infinity. The latter

477
00:32:18.759 --> 00:32:21.720
<v Speaker 1>opinion may be right and consistent with the former, but

478
00:32:21.759 --> 00:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>it is hardly a more simple one. Vermat While Descartes

479
00:32:27.960 --> 00:32:31.480
<v Speaker 1>was laying down the foundation of analytical geometry, the same

480
00:32:31.559 --> 00:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>subject was occupying the attention of another and hardly less

481
00:32:35.480 --> 00:32:40.599
<v Speaker 1>distinguished Frenchman. This was Fermat Pierre de Fermat, who was

482
00:32:40.640 --> 00:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>born near Montabon in sixteen o one and died at

483
00:32:44.240 --> 00:32:49.759
<v Speaker 1>Castree in January twelfth, sixteen sixty five, was the son

484
00:32:49.799 --> 00:32:53.279
<v Speaker 1>of a leather merchant. He was educated at home. In

485
00:32:53.359 --> 00:32:56.279
<v Speaker 1>sixteen thirty one he obtained the post of councilor for

486
00:32:56.319 --> 00:33:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the local parliament at Toulouse, and he discharged the duties

487
00:33:00.480 --> 00:33:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of the office with scrupulous accuracy and fidelity. There devoting

488
00:33:05.519 --> 00:33:08.720
<v Speaker 1>most of his leisure to mathematics. He spent the remainder

489
00:33:08.759 --> 00:33:11.359
<v Speaker 1>of his life, a life which, but for a somewhat

490
00:33:11.400 --> 00:33:16.319
<v Speaker 1>acrimonious dispute with Descartes on the validity of analysis used

491
00:33:16.359 --> 00:33:19.839
<v Speaker 1>by the latter, was unruffled by any event which calls

492
00:33:19.839 --> 00:33:23.799
<v Speaker 1>for special notice. The dispute was due chiefly to the

493
00:33:23.839 --> 00:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>obscurity of Descartes, but the tact and courtesy of Vermat

494
00:33:27.799 --> 00:33:32.119
<v Speaker 1>brought it to a friendly conclusion. Vermat was a good scholar,

495
00:33:32.160 --> 00:33:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and amused himself by conjecturally restoring the work of Apollonius

496
00:33:36.279 --> 00:33:41.839
<v Speaker 1>on plain loci. Except for a few isolated papers, Vermat

497
00:33:41.839 --> 00:33:46.599
<v Speaker 1>published nothing in his lifetime, and gave no systematic exposition

498
00:33:46.720 --> 00:33:49.559
<v Speaker 1>of his methods. Some of the most striking of his

499
00:33:49.720 --> 00:33:52.480
<v Speaker 1>results are found after his death on loose sheets of

500
00:33:52.559 --> 00:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>paper written on the margins of works which he had

501
00:33:56.519 --> 00:34:00.799
<v Speaker 1>read and annotated, and are unaccompanied by any proof. It

502
00:34:00.880 --> 00:34:04.799
<v Speaker 1>is thus somewhat difficult to estimate the dates and originality

503
00:34:04.839 --> 00:34:10.199
<v Speaker 1>of his work. After his death, his papers and correspondences

504
00:34:10.280 --> 00:34:14.199
<v Speaker 1>were printed by his nephew at Toulouse in two volumes

505
00:34:14.239 --> 00:34:18.760
<v Speaker 1>sixteen seventy and sixteen seventy nine. A summary of it

506
00:34:18.920 --> 00:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>with notes was published by Brazen and Toulouse in eighteen

507
00:34:23.039 --> 00:34:26.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty three, and a reprint of it was issued at

508
00:34:26.440 --> 00:34:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Berlin in eighteen sixty one. A new edition is now

509
00:34:31.360 --> 00:34:35.280
<v Speaker 1>being issued by the French government, which will include some

510
00:34:35.519 --> 00:34:38.880
<v Speaker 1>letters on his discoveries and methods in the theory of

511
00:34:38.960 --> 00:34:44.039
<v Speaker 1>numbers recently found at Leyden by M. Charles Henry Fermatt

512
00:34:44.199 --> 00:34:48.119
<v Speaker 1>was constitutionally modest and retiring, and does not seem to

513
00:34:48.159 --> 00:34:52.079
<v Speaker 1>have intended his papers to be published. It is probable

514
00:34:52.159 --> 00:34:56.719
<v Speaker 1>that he revised his notes as occasion required, and that

515
00:34:56.840 --> 00:35:00.599
<v Speaker 1>his published works represent the final form of his retire searches,

516
00:35:01.159 --> 00:35:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and therefore cannot be dated much earlier than sixteen sixty.

517
00:35:06.119 --> 00:35:10.559
<v Speaker 1>I shall consider separately one his investigations into the theory

518
00:35:10.599 --> 00:35:14.719
<v Speaker 1>of numbers, two his use in geometry of analysis and

519
00:35:14.840 --> 00:35:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of infinitesimals, and three his method of treating questions of probability. One.

520
00:35:22.840 --> 00:35:25.840
<v Speaker 1>The theory of numbers appears to have been the favorite

521
00:35:25.840 --> 00:35:30.320
<v Speaker 1>study of Fermat. He prepared an addition of Diophantus, and

522
00:35:30.440 --> 00:35:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the notes and comments thereon contain numerous theorems of considerable elegance.

523
00:35:36.280 --> 00:35:39.039
<v Speaker 1>This forms the first of two volumes of his works.

524
00:35:40.079 --> 00:35:43.199
<v Speaker 1>Most of the proofs of Fermat are lost, and it

525
00:35:43.239 --> 00:35:46.760
<v Speaker 1>is possible that some of them were not rigorous, an

526
00:35:46.760 --> 00:35:51.039
<v Speaker 1>induction by analogy and the intuition of genius sufficing to

527
00:35:51.119 --> 00:35:55.599
<v Speaker 1>lead him to correct results. The following examples will illustrate

528
00:35:55.639 --> 00:36:01.679
<v Speaker 1>these investigations. A. If p, b, prome, and A be

529
00:36:01.800 --> 00:36:04.440
<v Speaker 1>a prime to P, then A to the power of

530
00:36:04.559 --> 00:36:11.360
<v Speaker 1>P minus one subtract one is divisible by p. That is,

531
00:36:12.079 --> 00:36:14.719
<v Speaker 1>when you subtract one from A to the power of

532
00:36:14.800 --> 00:36:19.639
<v Speaker 1>P minus one, this is equivalent to zero modulus P.

533
00:36:20.960 --> 00:36:24.280
<v Speaker 1>A proof of this, first given by Euler, is well known.

534
00:36:24.480 --> 00:36:27.719
<v Speaker 1>A more general theorem, that of a to the power

535
00:36:27.760 --> 00:36:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of five of n subtracting one from that result is

536
00:36:32.000 --> 00:36:36.199
<v Speaker 1>equivalent to zero mod n. Where a is prime to

537
00:36:36.719 --> 00:36:40.199
<v Speaker 1>n and five n is the number of integers less

538
00:36:40.239 --> 00:36:44.679
<v Speaker 1>than n and prime to it. B A prime greater

539
00:36:44.760 --> 00:36:47.199
<v Speaker 1>than two can be expressed as the difference of two

540
00:36:47.239 --> 00:36:51.239
<v Speaker 1>square integers in one and only one way for MAT's

541
00:36:51.239 --> 00:36:54.199
<v Speaker 1>proof is as follows. Let N be the prime, and

542
00:36:54.280 --> 00:36:58.480
<v Speaker 1>suppose it equal to x squared minus y squared, that is,

543
00:36:59.000 --> 00:37:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to the product x plus y times x minus y. Now,

544
00:37:03.039 --> 00:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>by hypothesis, the only integral factors of N are n

545
00:37:07.239 --> 00:37:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a unity. Hence x plus y equals n n x

546
00:37:11.000 --> 00:37:15.000
<v Speaker 1>minus y equals one. Solving these equations, we get x

547
00:37:15.000 --> 00:37:18.519
<v Speaker 1>equals a half times n plus one, and y equals

548
00:37:18.519 --> 00:37:23.159
<v Speaker 1>a half times n minus one. C He gave a

549
00:37:23.199 --> 00:37:26.840
<v Speaker 1>proof of the statement by Diophantis quoted above that the

550
00:37:26.880 --> 00:37:30.239
<v Speaker 1>sum of the squares of two integers cannot be of

551
00:37:30.280 --> 00:37:34.079
<v Speaker 1>the form four n minus one, and that he added

552
00:37:34.119 --> 00:37:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a corollary, which I take to mean that it is

553
00:37:36.360 --> 00:37:39.679
<v Speaker 1>impossible that the product of a square and a prime

554
00:37:39.719 --> 00:37:42.639
<v Speaker 1>of the form four n minus one, even if multiplied

555
00:37:42.679 --> 00:37:46.159
<v Speaker 1>by a number prime to the latter, can be either

556
00:37:46.239 --> 00:37:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a square or the sum of two squares. For example,

557
00:37:49.960 --> 00:37:53.559
<v Speaker 1>forty four is a multiple of eleven, which is of

558
00:37:53.599 --> 00:37:58.599
<v Speaker 1>the form four times three minus one by four, hence

559
00:37:58.639 --> 00:38:01.559
<v Speaker 1>it cannot be expressed is a sum of two squares.

560
00:38:02.159 --> 00:38:04.719
<v Speaker 1>He also stated that a number of the form a

561
00:38:04.880 --> 00:38:08.280
<v Speaker 1>squared plus b squared, where a is prime to b,

562
00:38:08.480 --> 00:38:11.079
<v Speaker 1>cannot be divided by a prime of the form four

563
00:38:11.239 --> 00:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>n minus one d. Every prime of the form four

564
00:38:16.159 --> 00:38:19.440
<v Speaker 1>n plus one is expressible, and that in one way

565
00:38:19.519 --> 00:38:22.960
<v Speaker 1>only as a sum of two squares. This problem was

566
00:38:23.000 --> 00:38:25.840
<v Speaker 1>first solved by Euler, who shewed that the number of

567
00:38:25.880 --> 00:38:28.679
<v Speaker 1>the form two to the power m times four n

568
00:38:28.719 --> 00:38:31.840
<v Speaker 1>minus one can be always expressed as a sum of

569
00:38:31.920 --> 00:38:37.719
<v Speaker 1>two squares. E If a, b c are integers such

570
00:38:37.760 --> 00:38:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that A squared plus b squared equals c squared, then

571
00:38:40.840 --> 00:38:44.719
<v Speaker 1>A times b cannot be a square. Lagrange gave a

572
00:38:44.760 --> 00:38:50.400
<v Speaker 1>solution of this f the determination of a number x

573
00:38:50.480 --> 00:38:52.800
<v Speaker 1>such an x squared n plus one may be a

574
00:38:52.880 --> 00:38:55.719
<v Speaker 1>square Where n is a given integer which is not

575
00:38:55.800 --> 00:39:01.559
<v Speaker 1>a square. G There is only one integral solution of

576
00:39:01.639 --> 00:39:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the equation x squd plus two equals y cubed, and

577
00:39:05.039 --> 00:39:08.119
<v Speaker 1>there are only two integral solutions of the equation x

578
00:39:08.159 --> 00:39:12.360
<v Speaker 1>squard plus four equals y cubed. The required solution are

579
00:39:12.440 --> 00:39:16.320
<v Speaker 1>evidently for the first equation x equals five, and for

580
00:39:16.400 --> 00:39:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the second equation x equals two and x equals eleven.

581
00:39:20.440 --> 00:39:23.320
<v Speaker 1>This question was issued as a challenge to the English

582
00:39:23.320 --> 00:39:29.719
<v Speaker 1>mathematicians Wallace and Digby. H No integral values of x,

583
00:39:29.880 --> 00:39:33.519
<v Speaker 1>y z can be found to satisfy the equation x

584
00:39:33.599 --> 00:39:36.719
<v Speaker 1>to the n plus y to the n equals z

585
00:39:36.920 --> 00:39:40.559
<v Speaker 1>to the n if n be an integer greater than two.

586
00:39:41.719 --> 00:39:48.159
<v Speaker 1>This proposition, known as Fermat's last theorem, has acquired extraordinary

587
00:39:48.239 --> 00:39:51.559
<v Speaker 1>celebrity from the fact that no general demonstration of it

588
00:39:51.639 --> 00:39:54.400
<v Speaker 1>has ever been given, but there is no reason to

589
00:39:54.440 --> 00:39:59.800
<v Speaker 1>doubt that it is true. Probably Fermat discovered its truth

590
00:40:00.159 --> 00:40:03.039
<v Speaker 1>the case of an equals three, and then for the

591
00:40:03.079 --> 00:40:06.599
<v Speaker 1>case of an equals four. His proof for the former

592
00:40:06.880 --> 00:40:10.719
<v Speaker 1>of these cases is lost, but that for the latter

593
00:40:10.800 --> 00:40:13.760
<v Speaker 1>is extant, and a similar proof for the case of

594
00:40:13.800 --> 00:40:17.400
<v Speaker 1>an equals three was given by Euler. These proofs depend

595
00:40:17.440 --> 00:40:20.920
<v Speaker 1>on shewing that of three integral values of x y

596
00:40:21.119 --> 00:40:24.719
<v Speaker 1>z can be found which satisfy the equation, then it

597
00:40:24.719 --> 00:40:28.920
<v Speaker 1>will be possible to find three and other similar integers

598
00:40:29.280 --> 00:40:33.119
<v Speaker 1>which satisfy it. In this way, finally, we shew that

599
00:40:33.159 --> 00:40:36.679
<v Speaker 1>the equation must be satisfied by three values, which obviously

600
00:40:36.760 --> 00:40:41.440
<v Speaker 1>do not satisfy it. Thus no integral solution is possible.

601
00:40:42.119 --> 00:40:45.159
<v Speaker 1>It would seem that this method is inapplicable to any

602
00:40:45.239 --> 00:40:48.280
<v Speaker 1>cases except those of an equals three and an equals four.

603
00:40:51.519 --> 00:40:54.760
<v Speaker 1>For Matt's discovery of the general theorem was made later.

604
00:40:55.440 --> 00:40:58.639
<v Speaker 1>An easy demonstration can be given on the assumption that

605
00:40:58.719 --> 00:41:02.280
<v Speaker 1>a number can be resolved into prime or complex factors

606
00:41:02.679 --> 00:41:06.280
<v Speaker 1>in one and only one way. The assumption has been

607
00:41:06.280 --> 00:41:09.760
<v Speaker 1>made by some writers, but it is not universally true.

608
00:41:10.480 --> 00:41:14.800
<v Speaker 1>It is possible that Fermatt made some such supposition, though

609
00:41:14.880 --> 00:41:18.760
<v Speaker 1>it is perhaps more likely that he discovered a rigorous demonstration.

610
00:41:19.840 --> 00:41:22.880
<v Speaker 1>In eighteen twenty three, le Gendre obtained a proof for

611
00:41:22.960 --> 00:41:26.239
<v Speaker 1>the case of an equals five. In eighteen thirty two,

612
00:41:26.360 --> 00:41:30.559
<v Speaker 1>le Jeund Richle gave one for an equals fourteen, and

613
00:41:30.599 --> 00:41:34.639
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen forty la Mae and Lebezgue gave proofs for

614
00:41:34.960 --> 00:41:40.320
<v Speaker 1>an equals seven. The proposition appears to be true universally,

615
00:41:40.880 --> 00:41:44.719
<v Speaker 1>and in eighteen forty nine Coumer, by means of ideal primes,

616
00:41:44.760 --> 00:41:47.760
<v Speaker 1>proved it to be so for all numbers, except if

617
00:41:47.800 --> 00:41:52.639
<v Speaker 1>any which satisfy three conditions. It is not certain whether

618
00:41:52.679 --> 00:41:56.199
<v Speaker 1>any number can be found to satisfy these conditions, but

619
00:41:56.320 --> 00:41:59.360
<v Speaker 1>there is no number less than one hundred which does so.

620
00:42:00.159 --> 00:42:03.480
<v Speaker 1>The proof is complicated and difficult, and there can be

621
00:42:03.559 --> 00:42:07.519
<v Speaker 1>no doubt is based on the considerations unknown to Fermat.

622
00:42:08.480 --> 00:42:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I may add that to prove the truth of the

623
00:42:10.840 --> 00:42:14.440
<v Speaker 1>proposition where n is greater than four, it is obviously

624
00:42:14.480 --> 00:42:18.320
<v Speaker 1>sufficient to confine ourselves to cases where n is a prime,

625
00:42:18.920 --> 00:42:22.119
<v Speaker 1>and the first step in Coumer's demonstration is to shew

626
00:42:22.159 --> 00:42:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that in such cases one of the numbers x, y

627
00:42:26.000 --> 00:42:31.320
<v Speaker 1>z must be divisible by n. A letter exists now

628
00:42:31.360 --> 00:42:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in the University at Leyden, which gave an idea of

629
00:42:34.280 --> 00:42:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Format's methods. The letter is undated, but it would appear

630
00:42:38.519 --> 00:42:41.239
<v Speaker 1>that at the time Fermatt wrote it he had proved

631
00:42:41.239 --> 00:42:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the proposition h above only for the case when n

632
00:42:44.920 --> 00:42:51.000
<v Speaker 1>equals three two. I next proceed to mention Fermat's use

633
00:42:51.039 --> 00:42:56.079
<v Speaker 1>in geometry of analysis and of infinitesimals. It would seem

634
00:42:56.119 --> 00:42:59.199
<v Speaker 1>from his correspondence that he had thought out the principles

635
00:42:59.239 --> 00:43:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of analytic geometry for himself before reading Descartes geometri and

636
00:43:05.360 --> 00:43:09.280
<v Speaker 1>had realized that from the equation, or, as he calls it,

637
00:43:09.760 --> 00:43:14.119
<v Speaker 1>the specific property of a curve, all its properties could

638
00:43:14.119 --> 00:43:20.679
<v Speaker 1>be deduced. His extent papers on geometry deal, however, mainly

639
00:43:20.719 --> 00:43:24.880
<v Speaker 1>with the application of infinitesimals, to the determination of the

640
00:43:25.000 --> 00:43:28.639
<v Speaker 1>tangents to curves and to the quadrature of curves, and

641
00:43:28.679 --> 00:43:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to the questions of maxima and minima. Probably these papers

642
00:43:32.800 --> 00:43:36.440
<v Speaker 1>are a revision of his original manuscripts, which he destroyed

643
00:43:37.239 --> 00:43:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and were written about sixteen sixty three. But there is

644
00:43:40.920 --> 00:43:43.840
<v Speaker 1>no doubt that he was in possession of the general

645
00:43:43.880 --> 00:43:48.079
<v Speaker 1>idea of his methods for finding maxima and minima as

646
00:43:48.119 --> 00:43:53.039
<v Speaker 1>early as sixteen twenty eight and sixteen twenty nine. He

647
00:43:53.119 --> 00:43:58.159
<v Speaker 1>obtained the sub tangent to the eclipse cycloid cissoid, conchoid

648
00:43:58.400 --> 00:44:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and quadratrics by making the ordinance of the curve and

649
00:44:03.079 --> 00:44:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a straight line the same for two points whose absissay

650
00:44:07.440 --> 00:44:12.480
<v Speaker 1>were x and xus e. But there is nothing to

651
00:44:12.599 --> 00:44:16.360
<v Speaker 1>indicate that he was aware that the process was general,

652
00:44:17.119 --> 00:44:20.559
<v Speaker 1>and though in the course of his work he used

653
00:44:20.559 --> 00:44:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the principle, it is probable that he never separated it,

654
00:44:25.039 --> 00:44:28.280
<v Speaker 1>so to speak, from the symbols of the particular problem

655
00:44:28.320 --> 00:44:32.519
<v Speaker 1>he was considering. The first definite statement of the method

656
00:44:32.679 --> 00:44:36.639
<v Speaker 1>was due to Barrow and was published in sixteen sixty nine.

657
00:44:38.280 --> 00:44:42.199
<v Speaker 1>For Matt also obtained the areas of parabolas and hyperbolas

658
00:44:42.239 --> 00:44:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of any order, and determine the center of mass of

659
00:44:45.880 --> 00:44:49.719
<v Speaker 1>a few simple curves and of a paraboloid of revolution.

660
00:44:51.599 --> 00:44:55.039
<v Speaker 1>As an example of his method of solving these equations,

661
00:44:55.119 --> 00:44:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I will quote his solution of the problem to find

662
00:44:58.840 --> 00:45:02.639
<v Speaker 1>the area but between the parabola yqube equals p x

663
00:45:02.760 --> 00:45:06.559
<v Speaker 1>squared on the axis of X and the line x

664
00:45:06.599 --> 00:45:11.440
<v Speaker 1>equals a. He says that if the several ordinates at

665
00:45:11.480 --> 00:45:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the points for which x is equal to a A

666
00:45:15.400 --> 00:45:20.039
<v Speaker 1>times the quantity one minus e, and A times the

667
00:45:20.119 --> 00:45:24.199
<v Speaker 1>quantity one minus e to the power of two, and

668
00:45:24.280 --> 00:45:28.119
<v Speaker 1>so on be drawn, the area will be split into

669
00:45:28.159 --> 00:45:33.199
<v Speaker 1>a number of little rectangles whose areas are respectively a

670
00:45:33.440 --> 00:45:36.519
<v Speaker 1>E times p A squared to the power of one

671
00:45:36.679 --> 00:45:42.880
<v Speaker 1>third a e times one minus e, multiplied by the

672
00:45:42.960 --> 00:45:47.360
<v Speaker 1>quantity p A squared times the quantity one minus e squared,

673
00:45:48.239 --> 00:45:52.920
<v Speaker 1>all under a cube root. The sum of these is

674
00:45:53.079 --> 00:45:56.880
<v Speaker 1>P to the one third A to the five thirds

675
00:45:57.360 --> 00:46:03.239
<v Speaker 1>times e divided by the quantity d one minus one

676
00:46:03.320 --> 00:46:08.199
<v Speaker 1>minus e to the five thirds, and by a subsidiary proposition,

677
00:46:08.679 --> 00:46:11.719
<v Speaker 1>for of course he was not acquainted with the binomial theorem.

678
00:46:12.079 --> 00:46:15.320
<v Speaker 1>He finds the limit of this when e vanishes to

679
00:46:15.360 --> 00:46:18.079
<v Speaker 1>be three fifths p to the one third eight of

680
00:46:18.119 --> 00:46:23.679
<v Speaker 1>the five thirds. The theorems last mentioned were published only

681
00:46:23.719 --> 00:46:26.719
<v Speaker 1>after his death, and probably they were not written till

682
00:46:26.760 --> 00:46:31.480
<v Speaker 1>he had read the works of Cavalieri and Wallace. Kepler

683
00:46:31.519 --> 00:46:34.800
<v Speaker 1>had remarked that the values of a function immediately adjacent

684
00:46:34.840 --> 00:46:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to and on either side of, a maximum or minimum

685
00:46:37.960 --> 00:46:42.000
<v Speaker 1>value must be equal. For mad applied this principle to

686
00:46:42.079 --> 00:46:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a few examples. Thus, to find the maximum value of

687
00:46:46.159 --> 00:46:49.519
<v Speaker 1>x times the quantity A minus x, his method is

688
00:46:49.599 --> 00:46:53.159
<v Speaker 1>essentially equivalent to taking a consecutive value of x, namely

689
00:46:53.400 --> 00:46:56.880
<v Speaker 1>x minus e, where e is very small, and putting

690
00:46:57.199 --> 00:47:01.760
<v Speaker 1>x times quantity a minus x equal two quantity x

691
00:47:01.800 --> 00:47:06.000
<v Speaker 1>minus e multiplied by the quantity a minus x plus e.

692
00:47:07.480 --> 00:47:12.079
<v Speaker 1>Simplifying and ultimately putting e equals zero, we get x

693
00:47:12.119 --> 00:47:17.199
<v Speaker 1>equals half a. This value of x makes the given

694
00:47:17.239 --> 00:47:22.360
<v Speaker 1>expression a maximum three. Fermat must share with Pascal the

695
00:47:22.440 --> 00:47:26.320
<v Speaker 1>honor of having founded the theory of probabilities. I have

696
00:47:26.440 --> 00:47:30.920
<v Speaker 1>already mentioned the problem proposed to Pascal, and which he

697
00:47:31.039 --> 00:47:37.360
<v Speaker 1>communicated to Fermat, and have there given Pascal's solution. Format's

698
00:47:37.400 --> 00:47:40.920
<v Speaker 1>solution depends on the theory of combinations, and will be

699
00:47:40.960 --> 00:47:45.360
<v Speaker 1>sufficiently illustrated by the following example, the substance of which

700
00:47:45.800 --> 00:47:48.800
<v Speaker 1>was taken from a letter dated August twenty fourth, sixteen

701
00:47:48.880 --> 00:47:55.159
<v Speaker 1>fifty four, which occurs in the correspondence with Pascal. Fermat

702
00:47:55.239 --> 00:47:59.280
<v Speaker 1>discusses the case of two players and supposes that the

703
00:47:59.320 --> 00:48:02.440
<v Speaker 1>first one same two points to win, and the second

704
00:48:02.519 --> 00:48:06.400
<v Speaker 1>three points. The game will be then certainly decided in

705
00:48:06.440 --> 00:48:10.239
<v Speaker 1>the course of four trials. Take the letters A and

706
00:48:10.360 --> 00:48:13.519
<v Speaker 1>B and write down all the combinations that can be

707
00:48:13.599 --> 00:48:18.840
<v Speaker 1>formed of four letters. These combinations are the following sixteen.

708
00:48:18.960 --> 00:48:24.440
<v Speaker 1>In all. Now let big A denote the player who

709
00:48:24.480 --> 00:48:28.199
<v Speaker 1>wants two points, and big B denote the player who

710
00:48:28.239 --> 00:48:33.599
<v Speaker 1>wants three points. Then in these sixteen combinations, every combination

711
00:48:33.760 --> 00:48:38.360
<v Speaker 1>in which A occurs twice or oftener represents a case

712
00:48:38.400 --> 00:48:43.119
<v Speaker 1>favorable to big A, and every combination in which little

713
00:48:43.159 --> 00:48:47.880
<v Speaker 1>B occurs three times or oftener represents a case favorable

714
00:48:47.920 --> 00:48:53.119
<v Speaker 1>to player big B. Thus, on counting them, it will

715
00:48:53.199 --> 00:48:56.320
<v Speaker 1>be found that there will be eleven cases favorable to

716
00:48:56.400 --> 00:49:00.239
<v Speaker 1>A and five cases favorable to B, and since these

717
00:49:00.360 --> 00:49:03.960
<v Speaker 1>cases are all equally likely, a's chance of winning the

718
00:49:04.000 --> 00:49:08.480
<v Speaker 1>game is to be's chances as eleven is to five.

719
00:49:09.840 --> 00:49:12.559
<v Speaker 1>The only other problem on this subject, which as far

720
00:49:12.639 --> 00:49:16.039
<v Speaker 1>as I know, attracted the attention of Framat, was also

721
00:49:16.119 --> 00:49:20.760
<v Speaker 1>proposed to him by Pascal, and was as follows. A

722
00:49:20.840 --> 00:49:23.880
<v Speaker 1>person undertakes to throw a six with a die in

723
00:49:23.960 --> 00:49:28.559
<v Speaker 1>eight throws, supposing him to have made three throws without success,

724
00:49:29.079 --> 00:49:31.639
<v Speaker 1>what proportion of the stake should he be allowed to

725
00:49:31.800 --> 00:49:35.840
<v Speaker 1>take on condition of giving up his fourth throw. For

726
00:49:35.960 --> 00:49:39.519
<v Speaker 1>Matt's reasoning is his follows. The chance of success is

727
00:49:39.599 --> 00:49:42.920
<v Speaker 1>one in six, so that he should be allowed to

728
00:49:42.960 --> 00:49:45.679
<v Speaker 1>take one sixth of the stake on condition of giving

729
00:49:45.760 --> 00:49:49.320
<v Speaker 1>up his throw. But if we wish to estimate the

730
00:49:49.400 --> 00:49:52.159
<v Speaker 1>value of the fourth throw before any throw is made,

731
00:49:52.599 --> 00:49:55.559
<v Speaker 1>then the first throw is worth one six of the steak.

732
00:49:56.320 --> 00:50:00.039
<v Speaker 1>The second is worth one sixth of what remains, and

733
00:50:00.119 --> 00:50:04.239
<v Speaker 1>that is five thirty sixths of the steak. The third

734
00:50:04.320 --> 00:50:07.719
<v Speaker 1>throw is worth one six of what now remains, That

735
00:50:07.920 --> 00:50:12.159
<v Speaker 1>is twenty five over two hundred and sixteenths of the steak.

736
00:50:12.840 --> 00:50:18.400
<v Speaker 1>The fourth throw is worth one sixth of what now remains,

737
00:50:19.039 --> 00:50:23.239
<v Speaker 1>and that is one hundred and twenty five over one thousand,

738
00:50:23.320 --> 00:50:28.000
<v Speaker 1>two hundred ninety sixths of the steak. For Matt does

739
00:50:28.000 --> 00:50:31.079
<v Speaker 1>not seem to have carried the matter much further, But

740
00:50:31.159 --> 00:50:34.199
<v Speaker 1>his correspondence with Pascal shoes that his views on the

741
00:50:34.199 --> 00:50:39.039
<v Speaker 1>fundamental principles of the subject were accurate, those of Pascal

742
00:50:39.320 --> 00:50:44.199
<v Speaker 1>were not altogether correct. For Maat's reputation is quite unique

743
00:50:44.199 --> 00:50:48.840
<v Speaker 1>in the history of science. The problems on numbers which

744
00:50:48.840 --> 00:50:53.280
<v Speaker 1>he had proposed long defied all efforts to solve them,

745
00:50:53.760 --> 00:50:57.239
<v Speaker 1>and many of them yielded only to the skill of Euler.

746
00:50:58.800 --> 00:51:03.559
<v Speaker 1>One still remains on solved. This extraordinary achievement has overshadowed

747
00:51:03.559 --> 00:51:06.719
<v Speaker 1>his other work, but in fact it is all of

748
00:51:06.760 --> 00:51:10.119
<v Speaker 1>the highest order of excellence, and we can only regret

749
00:51:10.559 --> 00:51:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that he thought fit to write so little. End of

750
00:51:15.840 --> 00:51:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Part two read by Paul King, p J K dot

751
00:51:21.320 --> 00:51:24.679
<v Speaker 1>scripts dot MI I T dot ed U forward slash

752
00:51:24.760 --> 00:51:25.559
<v Speaker 1>p K J
