Speaker 1: The the, the the.
Speaker 2: The the the distant to the the the the the.
Speaker 1: The the.
Speaker 2: The the.
Speaker 1: The the the the.
Speaker 2: The the the the the the the the the the
Speaker 2: don't they do the.
Speaker 3: The the.
Speaker 2: The the the the the the the the the the
Speaker 2: the the the the the the the the the the
Speaker 2: the the the.
Speaker 3: The the the the the the.
Speaker 2: The the the the the the the the.
Speaker 3: The all right, welcome, welcome. I can't believe that the
Speaker 3: tech work that smooth and that easily. In fact, I
Speaker 3: don't think that's ever happened before. I've got mamnuka honey coffee,
Speaker 3: so hopefully we won't be caught by any throat aids
Speaker 3: and coffin fits. By the way, a coffin fit is
Speaker 3: not what Dracula has when he has a temper tantrum.
Speaker 3: That's a coffin fit. A coffin fit is when I
Speaker 3: start a coffin and it is the pollen in the
Speaker 3: air of this region. But thank you, thank you to
Speaker 3: all the online chat doctors who diagnose me on a
Speaker 3: never ending basis. I'm drinking my double shot of espresso
Speaker 3: and separately, as a bevers goblin. I've also got my
Speaker 3: goblet of ever, effervescence, effervescent, evanescence.
Speaker 4: Save me from the nothing, I bea come work with
Speaker 4: open so got waker save me?
Speaker 3: And no, I don't like that song. The only songs
Speaker 3: I like are Juggalo songs. By the way, we got
Speaker 3: a we got a couple of new items over here.
Speaker 3: Check this out, Check this out? Why's this?
Speaker 1: You ready got.
Speaker 3: Rid of that stupid zombie? Got a dollar signing up there?
Speaker 3: Storm the cast says for ten dollars. I noticed that
Speaker 3: the hat Man looks like Saturn. I wonder there's a
Speaker 3: connection between him and Molock. I mentioned this on Cotel,
Speaker 3: but he wasn't aware of the hat Man. The hat
Speaker 3: Man is an entity that people believe they see or
Speaker 3: appear to see or see, particularly when they do extremely
Speaker 3: high doses of menadrol, which is completely stupid. But there
Speaker 3: are idiots who will do anything like that because the
Speaker 3: Internet has threads talking about doing that, and they get
Speaker 3: the idea to take these ridiculously high doses of minadrol,
Speaker 3: which is the dumbest thing ever. And the people that
Speaker 3: get close enough to the edge of doom, we'll say,
Speaker 3: when they do this, they see this man and there's
Speaker 3: a bunch of people that record this, so it's supposedly
Speaker 3: not a single person. It's like multiple people's accounts of
Speaker 3: the hat Man. And that has nothing to do with
Speaker 3: what we're talking about today. But the question came in,
Speaker 3: and it seems to quite obviously be a demon or
Speaker 3: something akin to that. Right, it's this thing. They see
Speaker 3: this figure over here creeping. They see this pervy little
Speaker 3: figure over here, this little pervy man creeping on. I'm
Speaker 3: looking at peeping in the window. And there we go.
Speaker 3: Got me a nice little smooth house beat for them
Speaker 3: super chats, you know I'm talking about. It's not really
Speaker 3: a house beat. It's more like a chill trance beat
Speaker 3: going anyway. So I like, this is a funny T
Speaker 3: shirt here. I can't take Benader because I owe the
Speaker 3: hat Man money. I don't want to see him. So
Speaker 3: my obvious assessment was that this is obviously some type
Speaker 3: of demonic entity. And I wonder if certain demonic entities
Speaker 3: are unique to certain substances. I don't know, just kind
Speaker 3: of a suspicion speculation, but that's what I was referring
Speaker 3: to the hat Man. Now, somebody said, is there a
Speaker 3: reference to Saturn? Well, could just be a an entity
Speaker 3: or demon or an angel of death that appears. But also,
Speaker 3: as I was on one of the Psychedelic Bros. Interviews
Speaker 3: last night, we had a good interview who's asking questions
Speaker 3: about orthodoxy. His name's Float Universe. He's got a pretty
Speaker 3: decent sized Instagram page. We did an interview last night
Speaker 3: last night. Hen'll post that today, I imagine, and we
Speaker 3: got into this topic and my assessment, my theory is
Speaker 3: that people in different cultures, in terms of the religious
Speaker 3: programming that they're raised with, they will see the entities
Speaker 3: if they're in a drug trance or if or whatever,
Speaker 3: according to their cultural programming, shall we say so, In
Speaker 3: other words, they'll see if they've been raised to think
Speaker 3: that lizards are the manifestation of the evil God, then
Speaker 3: they will see demons as lizard men. Right, So it's
Speaker 3: culturally relative in the sense that the appearance of the
Speaker 3: entity will be relative to that culture. It's a demon still,
Speaker 3: but demons can wear different masks, right, So they might
Speaker 3: appear to another tribe under the mask of the moon
Speaker 3: God or whatever, but it's still the same entity behind
Speaker 3: the manifestation. So it's entirely possible. Then that the hat
Speaker 3: man who appears to the people who are on the
Speaker 3: brink of doom, shall we say, of the very high
Speaker 3: doses of that could be one of these types of entities.
Speaker 3: Obviously demon. Nobody describes the encounter with hat Man as
Speaker 3: anything positive. It's a feeling of dread, terror, fear. It's
Speaker 3: a demon. That's good, obvious dude.
Speaker 1: It's not even like the.
Speaker 3: So I'm having fun with this new sou preach out here.
Speaker 3: Let's try this one again, another.
Speaker 5: One, Low Pan, Lo Pan, Low Pan miss, how about that?
Speaker 3: We did not not contact you, lil miss about that?
Speaker 3: Until what does he said? I'm trying to think of, Lope,
Speaker 3: I forgot, Low Pans lines. You are not something you
Speaker 3: were not called upon to get it. You want not
Speaker 3: caught up to get it? About that? Yeah, I know,
Speaker 3: I know. I'm sorry, Low Pan says, if you haven't
Speaker 3: looked at the book Trilateral Commission and Global Governance nineteen
Speaker 3: seventy to nineteen eighty by Rutlish Press, interesting, I did
Speaker 3: just get the Rutledge official publication on the history of Tavistock.
Speaker 3: I did not know that there was a Dino Newts
Speaker 3: and PhD thesis uh printed by Rutlish Publishers, which is
Speaker 3: academic publishing. I will definitely get that. Thank you for
Speaker 3: that remind you're there, and that reminds me I forgot this.
Speaker 3: Doozy also arrived, which came in a big, old, giant version.
Speaker 3: I didn't know I was going to get the blind
Speaker 3: Boomer edition of The Fabian Freeway. So this is a
Speaker 3: classic too, and it will actually be relevant to today's
Speaker 3: global elite text uh from Jacques Attali. But this is
Speaker 3: of course the classic, famous history on the Fabian Society
Speaker 3: by Rose Martin, and it's gonna be relevant because I
Speaker 3: believe it or not, Jacques will bring it up, not
Speaker 3: that book, but he will bring it up some of
Speaker 3: the key Fabian developments.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 3: For those who are also curious as to what I'm wearing,
Speaker 3: shout out to my mom. She chose the coolest T
Speaker 3: shirt I've seen in a long time. I'm out of
Speaker 3: bubble gum, so she got me an awesome that they
Speaker 3: live rowdy Roddy Piper T shirt. That's awesome John Carpenter's shirt.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah. Also shout out to those who are the
Speaker 3: small audience over on twitch. But I'm always happy to
Speaker 3: expand the streaming to wherever we can and to ex Twitter.
Speaker 3: I can't believe this worked. I spent the whole morning
Speaker 3: making sure that I can multi stream, and of course
Speaker 3: there's a lot of means and ways to do this.
Speaker 3: Most people do it with stream Yard. I've still not
Speaker 3: used Streamyard. I'm really wetted to. What happens is you
Speaker 3: get really used to the tech that you've been using,
Speaker 3: and so I'm really wetted to and used to what
Speaker 3: I'm using. So I don't feel like the whole ordeal
Speaker 3: of going through transitioning over to stream Yard and shout
Speaker 3: out to stream Labs, because I've actually been making it
Speaker 3: a lot better. Now that they have collab Cam, I
Speaker 3: don't have to use stupid ass zoom anymore, and now
Speaker 3: that they have the multi stream function, I don't have
Speaker 3: to go full with freaking stream yard or restream whatever.
Speaker 3: So it's good.
Speaker 1: It's good.
Speaker 3: When they initially released collab Cam, it didn't work, but
Speaker 3: stream Yard excuse me, stream Labs has really up their
Speaker 3: game and it's working great for me now. The only
Speaker 3: problem is that I can't yet have a guest and
Speaker 3: play a video, so that's one the one big advantage
Speaker 3: that stream yard has that I think eventually maybe stream
Speaker 3: labs will fix. But I'm really, I really am a
Speaker 3: fan of stream streamlines. Of fact, I got a message
Speaker 3: saying that last year I was in the top percentage
Speaker 3: earners on stream labs. So shout out to the audience,
Speaker 3: because you guys were the source of that. So I
Speaker 3: was up there at the top of stream stream labs
Speaker 3: last year. By the way, you can support via heading
Speaker 3: over to the stream labs link right there in the
Speaker 3: chat there or in the show description. You can send
Speaker 3: a super chat at any time via stream labs. You
Speaker 3: just click that link and it pulls up the stream
Speaker 3: labs page. You put in your question, send whatever amount
Speaker 3: and it will pop up on the screen. And I've
Speaker 3: gotten rid of that as stupid as zombie gif. And
Speaker 3: now we got our nango it needs to be I
Speaker 3: wanted a bitcoin sign it instead of a dollar, but whatever,
Speaker 3: we got some smooth chill house music. Travis sends ten
Speaker 3: dollars and he says, let's go baby, Thank you so much, Anonymous.
Speaker 3: Anonymous got the rave going in here. Three dollars JJJ.
Speaker 3: Please do more streams on TikTok. By the way, you
Speaker 3: can integrate TikTok. It looks like so I might try
Speaker 3: to do that. Problem is, every time I try to
Speaker 3: integrate and do these types of things on TikTok, everything
Speaker 3: is banned. So you can get away with religious debates
Speaker 3: pretty easily on there, But everybody in there's a just
Speaker 3: such idiots. Man, It's like the dumbest people out there
Speaker 3: on TikTok. So it's so trying do more uh TikTok
Speaker 3: streams on internal monologues or the the Tussami guy. Uh
Speaker 3: I follow that do? He followed me back too. I'll
Speaker 3: try to find that. Would you debate mal passing in uh? Maybe?
Speaker 3: I don't know. Uh, we got a debate coming up
Speaker 3: in two days with the an Rand Institute or something,
Speaker 3: the an Ran Institute's uh philosopher of uh transhumanism or whatever.
Speaker 3: I've I was not familiar with this person. Yeah, Ron
Speaker 3: Brooks and we will be debating this weekend over on
Speaker 3: the large Baas redpil channel of our friend Jake Rattlesnake. So,
Speaker 3: Jake's a cool dude. He's had Rachel on I'm gonna
Speaker 3: be over there on Jake's channel eventually doing an interview
Speaker 3: as well. And he's gonna be moderating the debate between
Speaker 3: me and the an Rand Institute. Dude, So that should
Speaker 3: be fun. He is an academic. I think he has
Speaker 3: a degree. I don't. I'm not sure what his degree
Speaker 3: is in. But should be a fun debate. The premise
Speaker 3: is kan society be governed by science and reason alone?
Speaker 3: And is transhumanism a good thing? Or what? Something like that?
Speaker 3: All right, thank you for those superchats again, support the
Speaker 3: stream Vias superchats. I'm so happy to get back to
Speaker 3: the Global Elite book series because you know, that's that's
Speaker 3: kind of in many ways. We got a few bread
Speaker 3: and butters over here.
Speaker 2: We're out bread and boodle.
Speaker 3: Toos the gen That's what baby heeds me.
Speaker 1: I'm loving me.
Speaker 3: For some reason. In high school, when we would smoke
Speaker 3: green things, I thought that was the funniest song ever.
Speaker 3: I don't know why, me and my buddy Ben we
Speaker 3: thought that was super funny. Like ninth grade, dude, I'm
Speaker 3: talking ninth grade, Okay, I'm not talking senior year. I
Speaker 3: don't know why. That is a ridiculous song though. And
Speaker 3: you know we got a few. We've got a few
Speaker 3: bread and butters, right, we got Hollywood we got Esoteric Hollywood.
Speaker 3: Head on over to Jay's analysis in the shop. You
Speaker 3: see the link right there, right And in the shop
Speaker 3: you get signed copies of Esoteric Hollywood one and two,
Speaker 3: the classics. You can also get the meta narratives over there.
Speaker 3: You can also get the Big Fat Red Book, which
Speaker 3: I'm right now sold out of, so those are on
Speaker 3: order back order. You get signed copies in the shop. Anyway,
Speaker 3: our bread and Butter is not just Hollywood. It's also
Speaker 3: doing goofy things. Now we've integrated so called comedy. And
Speaker 3: if you come to our live event, you will see
Speaker 3: some of that so called comedy live at an event
Speaker 3: where they have so called comedy with me my event
Speaker 3: and Jamie's event. A lot of impressions, a lot of absurdities.
Speaker 3: It is not the same as last year's. Last year,
Speaker 3: if you don't know, my live events included me having
Speaker 3: a debate with the Funko Pop. That was the live event,
Speaker 3: and I won every debate by smashing the Funkle Pop
Speaker 3: Gallagher style. So those who are fortunate enough to see
Speaker 3: those live events got to see all that live at
Speaker 3: an event. But we will be live in Las Vegas.
Speaker 3: If you click in the show description or if you're
Speaker 3: on my Twitter or whatever, you can click at the
Speaker 3: top penned the event right link to get tickets. It's me,
Speaker 3: It's Jamie Hanshaw, It's Isaac Weishap doing an entire talk
Speaker 3: on iWatch Out. He's gonna have merch, he's gonna have
Speaker 3: all his shiz knits there got made by Jim Bob
Speaker 3: coming now, also doing a presentation. It's a mystery president.
Speaker 3: I don't know what Jim Bob's gonna do. He's gonna
Speaker 3: do some fun goofy stuff. And Jim Bob can sing.
Speaker 3: Jim Gob that's a that's a dude that shows up
Speaker 3: that mimics and mocks Jim Bob. There's Jim Bob and
Speaker 3: there's Jim Goob, and that's like his ripoff dude who's
Speaker 3: like his foil. I just made it up. Jim Bob
Speaker 3: can sing, dance, he does Vegas showgirl stuff. I mean,
Speaker 3: he does it all. Okay, so get your tickets right now,
Speaker 3: June twenty second, that's what two weeks from now you got.
Speaker 3: You barely got two weeks. Head on over there and
Speaker 3: get those tickets and I just might forgive you. Okay,
Speaker 3: Now you guys know one of the classics. The other
Speaker 3: other Brendon Butter is the Global Elite book series, and
Speaker 3: we've done many of these. I really won't want to
Speaker 3: do Changing Images of Man, but there it's just so
Speaker 3: you can't find a physical copy of it.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 3: I think the last Global Elite book series that we
Speaker 3: were touching on and tackling was actually we could include
Speaker 3: sex espionage in that even though it's not written by
Speaker 3: a global elite man, it's written by just a normal historian.
Speaker 3: We finished this last night and the part two went
Speaker 3: out to all the subscribers, so yes, I did finally
Speaker 3: finish this. I know it took a while, so if
Speaker 3: you're over on Rock finis right here. Part two just
Speaker 3: went up and we delved deep into the history of
Speaker 3: how the elites control us through these types of operations.
Speaker 3: We will also do the second analysis of this classic,
Speaker 3: which is the same topic but much more recent with
Speaker 3: jeff Stein mcgeffrey. And prior to those, the last Global
Speaker 3: Elite texts that we've done was something in the vein
Speaker 3: of really a continuation to Quickly, which was the Eawan
Speaker 3: Rod to a book the Milliner Fabian Conspiracy. Hence why
Speaker 3: Fabian freeway will fit very well with those texts. Now
Speaker 3: we mentioned that Jecques Attalie is an important figure in
Speaker 3: the previous talk where we covered his book Brief History
Speaker 3: of the Future. That was one of our early global
Speaker 3: elite text lectures. In this series, which is a never
Speaker 3: ending series, there's always more writings of the elite to analyze,
Speaker 3: to decode and to display before this lovely audience. Al
Speaker 3: the Waugh, if you would it like and share? Where
Speaker 3: is everybody what? There's nothing else to do. You need
Speaker 3: to be here doing this, Okay, we need to be
Speaker 3: understanding how the system operates, so you better get your
Speaker 3: butt over here, sit down, get out your pen and paper,
Speaker 3: get take notes. This is the first half of lecture.
Speaker 3: Somebody said the other day do Jacques Attalie's first American
Speaker 3: translated globalist book called Millennium? And I was like, oh,
Speaker 3: that sounds interesting. Well I went and looked it up
Speaker 3: and it's a very readable, accessible little text. And what
Speaker 3: do we know, we got another global elite man up
Speaker 3: here giving a blurb, Alvin Toffler. It's an unsettling, exhilarating,
Speaker 3: scintillating work. Atli is always there to teach us with crackling,
Speaker 3: creative intelligence crackling? How does creative intelligence crackle? I don't
Speaker 3: know what that means, but it's odd choice of words.
Speaker 3: But and then we got Arthur Schleisinger Atli's Millennium is
Speaker 3: a fertile speculation of the things to come. And it's
Speaker 3: called in its subtitle winners and losers looters. There's more
Speaker 3: more accurate, right, IMF looters, Winners and IMF looters in
Speaker 3: the coming world order. Now wait a minute, remember, for
Speaker 3: decades there was no such thing as that, right, no NW.
Speaker 3: And yet the global elite people were writing books about
Speaker 3: the coming of What does that say? Oh, I don't
Speaker 3: know what that minute. I don't know what that means.
Speaker 3: It doesn't exist, even though I see it in front
Speaker 3: of my face. It must not exist, because the authority
Speaker 3: system and the authority structure that exists has told me
Speaker 3: it doesn't exist, even though I'm reading right here that
Speaker 3: does exist right in front of my face. But now,
Speaker 3: this book came out in nineteen ninety one, so we
Speaker 3: are what fifteen years prior to the famous Brief History
Speaker 3: of the Future book that we reviewed many years ago,
Speaker 3: six seven years ago, when we were beginning this series.
Speaker 3: Of course, this series began with Doctor Carroll Quigley's Tragic
Speaker 3: and Hope. We did Anglo American Establishment. Soon after we
Speaker 3: did Marilyn Ferguson's Aquarian Conspiracy, which is not a conspiracy book.
Speaker 3: Then we did Jacques Antele's Brief Hits in the Future
Speaker 3: from two thousand and six. Well, it turns out Jacques,
Speaker 3: who again is the Kissinger of France, Jacques Attali, Jique
Speaker 3: and Monkey and then the Gene, the Kissinger of France,
Speaker 3: wrote an earlier book Way Ahead, in its predictions. In fact,
Speaker 3: if you recall, he made the prediction of nomadic devices,
Speaker 3: which he said, these devices of the future would allow
Speaker 3: us to be cut off, deracinated from our traditional structures
Speaker 3: of family, nation, state, and ATOI was absolutely correct. He
Speaker 3: said the effect of consumerism would be as it was
Speaker 3: mass produced these devices laptops, TVs, and especially these would
Speaker 3: allow us to become more mobile and no longer be
Speaker 3: attached to the things that formerly rooted us as human beings.
Speaker 3: Hence he titled the Nomadic Devices. Now I didn't know
Speaker 3: that he hadn't just said that in two thousand and six.
Speaker 3: He said it in his nineteen ninety one book millennium. Wow,
Speaker 3: so even more have the curve than we expected. And
Speaker 3: there's some interesting artwork. I don't know who chose the artwork.
Speaker 3: If you publish a book, typically, right, it's not the
Speaker 3: author that chooses the artwork. So a lot of times
Speaker 3: people like have these conspiracies and these oh why did
Speaker 3: you put this on the cover of your book that
Speaker 3: I didn't choose the cover of my book. Okay, And
Speaker 3: most people who have a publisher, they don't get to
Speaker 3: choose the cover of their book. I had nothing to
Speaker 3: do with the cover of this book at all. That's
Speaker 3: what publishers and editors do. For Atali, though, there is
Speaker 3: this bizarre I can't even read this. It's so small.
Speaker 3: It looks like the months or the or is it
Speaker 3: maybe I guess the months twelve? It's twelve. So he's
Speaker 3: got these weird drawings in Lois It looked like etchings
Speaker 3: and woodcuts. Right now, remember Atli was the kissinger to
Speaker 3: Francois meets Arond. Okay, so we're talking about the power
Speaker 3: behind the throne, so to speak, again, the kissinger of France,
Speaker 3: and he is identified that as that by Toffler in
Speaker 3: the forward. Okay, so that's not conspiracy theorizing. It's actually
Speaker 3: right here. He says, this is nineteen ninety one. Atily
Speaker 3: is not known in America. America's too provincial. Oh yeah,
Speaker 3: we're not. We're not sophisticated in European. In fact, it
Speaker 3: was Jacques Attalie who accompanied Foncois Mitehrand in the global
Speaker 3: meetings with Gorba Chop And it was because of this
Speaker 3: Kissinger of France role that Toffler says, Atli was placed
Speaker 3: as the head of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development,
Speaker 3: and he says that he is there to help Eastern
Speaker 3: Europe undergo the painful transition from a centrally planned Soviet
Speaker 3: economy to a market based one. However, he's not well
Speaker 3: known in America because Americans are provincial. He says that
Speaker 3: uh Ataly is a force of intellect and his interests
Speaker 3: and his analyses are broad and wide ranging. In fact,
Speaker 3: Toefler says, he wrote a fascinating treatise on the connection
Speaker 3: between politics and the economics of music. How does music
Speaker 3: relate to political culture? Well, they're gonna you're gonna find
Speaker 3: and you're gonna see some interesting comments from Ataly which
Speaker 3: I think help us to understand why. In fact, you
Speaker 3: will even see a couple esoteric references from Ataly, which
Speaker 3: makes sense given what we read and brief pitch in
Speaker 3: the Future where he talks about the global brain when
Speaker 3: we're all linked in our minds to the web, which
Speaker 3: he calls the gollum and he says that, uh, in fact,
Speaker 3: Ataly could be the head of a bank which could
Speaker 3: become a new pill of the global order. Now this
Speaker 3: is right at the beginning of the public announcement of
Speaker 3: the EU. Right, Women's the EU publicly announced, wasn't it
Speaker 3: like early nineties EU? Now we know from our writings
Speaker 3: in our ninety three Okay, so this is two years
Speaker 3: before the public announcement of the EU. However, the EU
Speaker 3: was already planned by the OSS and the post World
Speaker 3: War two powers in the forties and fifties, and in
Speaker 3: fact we know that that was the case through the
Speaker 3: what's called the European Project. And we went into great
Speaker 3: detail in Rawtu's excellent geopolitical absolute masterpiece necessary work, the
Speaker 3: Milliner Fabian Conspiracy, and he's got an entire chapter dedicated
Speaker 3: to all the goons and goblins behind project and essentially
Speaker 3: the Fabian socialists who are the architects of it. And
Speaker 3: yet again here we have something that is not new
Speaker 3: in the nineteen nineties. But even in this book, they're
Speaker 3: essentially saying that he might be the head of the
Speaker 3: biggest bank going forward. Of course that didn't actually materialize
Speaker 3: because there's two areas of this book's thesis which ended
Speaker 3: up being wrong. So notice that the global elites, when
Speaker 3: they write this kind of book, they don't always get
Speaker 3: everything right. They project things into the future, they have theories, plans, analysis, actuaries,
Speaker 3: et cetera. And they're not always one hundred percent correct.
Speaker 3: And we're going to notice two key points where I'll
Speaker 3: tell that you got things wrong, but we're also going
Speaker 3: to see a lot of places where he got things
Speaker 3: really correct. Jordan Flores says, can you write a book
Speaker 3: on how to win an argument against my wife? No,
Speaker 3: because no one can win an argument against your wife.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 3: Steven Bissett, do you have a problem? Why are you
Speaker 3: even here? If you don't like what you're seeing here,
Speaker 3: you can just leave, dude, get out here.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 3: Interesting again, the woodcuts. I don't know what the woodcuts mean.
Speaker 3: It's another bizarre woodcut of almost a kind of alchemical
Speaker 3: This is like a an angel man handing a book,
Speaker 3: and then an angel above the angel who's blessing the people.
Speaker 3: I don't, I don't can't tell what this means. You
Speaker 3: can figure out what this means. But so Ottley begins
Speaker 3: by saying that, well, we're entering a new era because
Speaker 3: the Berlin Wall has fallen. So this book is written
Speaker 3: right around that time. It's just fallen. And he says
Speaker 3: Toddler's future shock, that's old news. Change the only constant
Speaker 3: that's not actually true. In fact, if change is the
Speaker 3: only constant, you couldn't say change is the only constant
Speaker 3: because the proposition itself would be self refuting and would
Speaker 3: no longer be true. So if change is the only constant, yeah,
Speaker 3: thank you. By the way, we got eight hundred people
Speaker 3: on x that's cool. You guys would hit like and share.
Speaker 3: We got four hundred over here on YouTube. That's nice.
Speaker 3: Attili says that history is accelerating, the Berlin Walls falling.
Speaker 3: Now we're in a new order and nWo so key
Speaker 3: elements here that will be admitted is that it's almost like,
Speaker 3: as Atili will point out later, he says that the
Speaker 3: balance of powers in the world during the Cold War
Speaker 3: were two pillars with a pyramid in the middle. Yes,
Speaker 3: he says this, I kid you not. He says, the
Speaker 3: two pillars are USSR and USSA, and then the pyramid
Speaker 3: in the middle. And he says that now that the
Speaker 3: Cold War has come to an end, the Berlin Wall
Speaker 3: has fallen, the Soviet Union has collapsing. He says that
Speaker 3: this pillar over here of the USSR is gone. Now
Speaker 3: we have and he says, the pyramid, by the way,
Speaker 3: is the US with the dollar at the top. So
Speaker 3: the end of the USSR removes the balance of power,
Speaker 3: so to speak, to the new liberal, open market order
Speaker 3: of pluralism. But before we get to all that fascinating statement,
Speaker 3: at the very beginning of the book, I did not expect,
Speaker 3: Atali says, you might think that if you want to
Speaker 3: understand today's world, you would want to read classics of
Speaker 3: economics and geopolitics like Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations or
Speaker 3: Karl Marx's Dost Capital. And why yes, wouldn't every sophisticated
Speaker 3: nerdman geopolitical nerd man online ran We're read on the
Speaker 3: book Kyle marks share and he says those aren't even
Speaker 3: as relevant as Blade Runner. Yes, you heard me right,
Speaker 3: Jacquette Deliz says Blade Runner is more relevant today than
Speaker 3: Dot's Capital or wealth of Nations. That interesting. It's almost
Speaker 3: like he's thinking Esoter Hollywood was like, he's thinking in
Speaker 3: this kind of way. Yeah, exactly. By the way, shout
Speaker 3: out to those super chatters. I love my new my
Speaker 3: new sounds here, look at this, here we go. He says,
Speaker 3: Blade Runner is going to be more accurate because the
Speaker 3: future that we're going into will be technocratic nineteen ninety one, y'all,
Speaker 3: this wasn't written in two thousand and twenty four. So again,
Speaker 3: a lot of things he's gonna get right, particularly with
Speaker 3: tech predictions, and in fact, believe it or not, Jacquette
Speaker 3: Deli is actually gonna get it quite a few geopolitical
Speaker 3: things and analyzes correct. The question, though, is that in
Speaker 3: critiques he's going to get some really accurate critiques. Believe
Speaker 3: it or not, I was surprised. That does not mean
Speaker 3: his answers are correct. Now, he says that look, if
Speaker 3: the US is going to go into the future, if
Speaker 3: it's going to be the center of global power in
Speaker 3: the future, he says it's going to have to transform,
Speaker 3: and one of the things that's going to have to
Speaker 3: transform is that money will have to move at the
Speaker 3: speed of the future. And he doesn't know if the
Speaker 3: dollar and these kinds of things are going to be
Speaker 3: able to move at the speed that globalization will require.
Speaker 3: That's fascinating because he wasn't even thinking of bitcoin. He
Speaker 3: wasn't even thinking of cryptocurrencies. And of course it's Silicon
Speaker 3: Valley America, the West that develops bitcoin. And by the way,
Speaker 3: bitcoin will actually answer a lot of the things that
Speaker 3: atally brings up as problems, So again nineteen ninety one,
Speaker 3: he didn't have any knowledge of those. He says that
Speaker 3: the future people will be severed from any national alliance
Speaker 3: by the microchip gadgets that they have. These nomadic devices
Speaker 3: will make some people into rich nomads. They will be
Speaker 3: able to participate in a global liberal market culture through
Speaker 3: economic choice. They will be able to roam the planet
Speaker 3: seeking ways to use their free time. Not everybody will
Speaker 3: participate in this, however, there will be many in the
Speaker 3: future who become obsolete, their functions are obsolete. There will
Speaker 3: be beggars of the future, the poor nomads, boat people
Speaker 3: on a planetary scale, applying the planet, searching for sustenance
Speaker 3: and shelter. It's almost as if they planned global upheaval
Speaker 3: to move the populations and to make them into nomads
Speaker 3: in order to have the end of the nation state.
Speaker 3: In other words, the open market liberal order post Soviet
Speaker 3: Union is the means by which there will be the
Speaker 3: transformation away from the nation state. And he says that
Speaker 3: you can read Alvin Toffler about this, and he says,
Speaker 3: I'm saying basically the same thing. Like past civilizations, they
Speaker 3: sought order to ward off the threat of nature and
Speaker 3: other warring tribes and men. This coming new order of
Speaker 3: the future will be based on the ability to manage violence.
Speaker 3: Unlike previous orders. However, they were ruled by religion in
Speaker 3: the past, then it transitioned to military force. The new
Speaker 3: order of the future will manage all violence largely by
Speaker 3: economic control. In other words, microchips, devices, et cetera. And
Speaker 3: if we want to with that cbdc UBI, et cetera,
Speaker 3: we're gonna need to have the means in this electronic
Speaker 3: age of opposing the electronic centralized control. This is the
Speaker 3: only one that does that. Bitcoin, it's decentralized. By the way,
Speaker 3: are you having a good week. Many of us are
Speaker 3: having good weeks. In five days, bitcoin is up five percent. Now, okay,
Speaker 3: guys clicking the button, what did Ivan say. There's a
Speaker 3: good chance that we popped to eighty or ninety. Okay,
Speaker 3: seventy was a big key resistance point. If we can
Speaker 3: edge above seventy, there's a good chance of popping to
Speaker 3: eighty or ninety. Not guaranteed, but again, we know we're
Speaker 3: going to one hundred and fifty eventually. Okay, it might
Speaker 3: be this year, it might be next year, who knows.
Speaker 3: But look, I just heard today that the pension funds,
Speaker 3: the boomer pension funds, are now looking for bitcoin exposure. Anyway,
Speaker 3: if you do, by the way, I want to get
Speaker 3: started with bitcoin. If you're looking for an outlet to
Speaker 3: just custody bitcoin and buy bitcoin, then I recommend swan Bitcoin.
Speaker 3: And here is the promo code where you can head
Speaker 3: over to swan bitcoin and get started by just buying
Speaker 3: and cussing bitcoin. And I remember, I had no idea
Speaker 3: what was in this book, but a lot of what
Speaker 3: Athlete brings up will actually be totally relevant to what
Speaker 3: bitcoin is. And I think countries that align themselves with
Speaker 3: this the future of real money. Those are going to
Speaker 3: be the ones that are prosperous and powerful.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 3: Actually, he moves on to say that in the close
Speaker 3: of the Saddam Hussein situation there in the early nineties
Speaker 3: there or he says that the USA is expanding itself
Speaker 3: into too many foreign interventions and wars. By the way,
Speaker 3: no people always ask me this. There's a different Jay
Speaker 3: Dyard that is not me that wrote the Big Coin book.
Speaker 3: Even though I'm a big supporter a Big coin, I
Speaker 3: don't know who wrote that book. I have no idea.
Speaker 3: I assume it's a real person. I don't think it
Speaker 3: was somebody just stealing my name. Anyway, I don't know
Speaker 3: what you mean. Swan doesn't accept fifty dollars a month purchases.
Speaker 3: I think they do, I mean not on the app.
Speaker 3: It's like you can put in you can put in
Speaker 3: any amount a month you want. I think. Let me
Speaker 3: look and see. So let's see recurring by fifty dollars
Speaker 3: a week. Let's see if you can add a different amounts,
Speaker 3: edit it, and maybe you have to do it every
Speaker 3: Maybe you have to do it every every week and
Speaker 3: not a month. I don't know. I mean fifty dollars
Speaker 3: a month, dude, come on, you gotta be you gotta
Speaker 3: I would do more than that. It's like fifty dollars
Speaker 3: a month anyway. By the way, so thank you for
Speaker 3: the support. If you're on x uh, these links are
Speaker 3: I don't have these links on X so you can
Speaker 3: get these links over on YouTube. Now let's see where
Speaker 3: are we at here we go back to Ottili, Atile says,
Speaker 3: because of all the expansion into foreign interventions, like all
Speaker 3: previous empires, America will exhaust itself. I think this is
Speaker 3: a very plausible critique, and here we are, what thirty
Speaker 3: ish years later, and this does seem to be correct.
Speaker 3: Nine hundred x. That's awesome. So Attily is correct that
Speaker 3: in comparing the US to he says Spain, this is fascinating.
Speaker 3: He says, if you look at the history of the
Speaker 3: Spanish Empire and its fall. He cites a historian named
Speaker 3: Paul Kennedy The Rise and Fall of Great Powers. He
Speaker 3: says that once Spain in the sixteen thirty four decided
Speaker 3: to get involved in the conflicts of the Thirty Years War,
Speaker 3: this essentially exhausted them. Spanish monarchy was sagging under massive debts,
Speaker 3: and its inefficient industries. This eventually led to the bank kruptcy,
Speaker 3: the declaration of bankruptcy in the sixteen forties by the
Speaker 3: Spanish king, and the full decline of the Spanish Empire.
Speaker 3: He says that if you compare the US troop movements,
Speaker 3: this is in the early nineties, Broler, I remember this
Speaker 3: is the nineties, Saudi Arabia, Persian Gulf conflict, Iraq blah
Speaker 3: blah blah. This is key. Now here's where Atley is
Speaker 3: really correct. Okay, so no, he's going to get some
Speaker 3: things very wrong. But this first couple chapters of this
Speaker 3: book actually surprised me. I mean he was particularly the
Speaker 3: first chapter. This first chapter is like really accurate, and
Speaker 3: he's accurate from analyzing the problems he's doing a critique
Speaker 3: of consumerism. All this stuff's great. Does not mean his
Speaker 3: answers are great. His answers are terrible. But first chapter
Speaker 3: is actually really spot on it and basically everything we
Speaker 3: would say. Now he says, like Spain, the United States
Speaker 3: is not the first great power to become mired and
Speaker 3: massive debt, as it remains retains global responsibilities. America has
Speaker 3: over extended its debt and this will become a symptom
Speaker 3: of fatal imbalance before its eventual demise. The US debt
Speaker 3: crisis cannot ultimately be solved by kicking the cannon on
Speaker 3: the road, et cetera, and more debt. He says that
Speaker 3: it is more evident that the central organizing principle of
Speaker 3: the future, whatever happens to be in the margins, will
Speaker 3: be economic. This will become apparent as we get closer
Speaker 3: to the year two thousand. The rule of military might
Speaker 3: be characterized by the Cold War, it's being replaced by
Speaker 3: the reign of markets. The liberal ideas, the open market,
Speaker 3: the democracy, the liberal market, et cetera. Have defeated the
Speaker 3: chief rival of communism. To be sure, however, the conundrum remains,
Speaker 3: how will we balance this economic growth with social justice?
Speaker 3: So in the nineties nineteen ninety one, he's already predicting
Speaker 3: and talking about social justice will be the buzzword of
Speaker 3: the future. How do we fix the social justice caused
Speaker 3: by economic disparities? And again, this is like a weird
Speaker 3: left idea that's totally debonked. I think it should be
Speaker 3: even though people still believe this. People think that the
Speaker 3: reason that there's crime and the reason that people act
Speaker 3: bad is because of social inequalities, like as if we
Speaker 3: had equality, there wouldn't be crime. No crime happens because
Speaker 3: humans are fallen and they choose vice. That's why over virtue.
Speaker 3: So the left, they typically will classic progressives even today,
Speaker 3: the left whatever, they mistake the symptoms for the causes.
Speaker 3: So the reason that we have crime and all this
Speaker 3: crazy stuff is not inequality, it's those are manifestations of
Speaker 3: fallen human beings choosing evil. But remember, the left can't
Speaker 3: admit that there's such a thing as evil because that
Speaker 3: would undo the whole progressive as paradigm. Attali says that
Speaker 3: the West America is particularly transitioning away from an industrial
Speaker 3: economy to a service economy. That's correct, and in fact,
Speaker 3: if we were called the analysis of one of the
Speaker 3: other globally texts, alex Obeya's Rank Corporation book, Soldiers of Reason,
Speaker 3: that we've did analysis of Abya actually says that the
Speaker 3: Rank Corporation was the brains behind that transition. So this
Speaker 3: was actually a planned thing. Wasn't accidental to transition America
Speaker 3: into a service economy away from an industrial economy. It
Speaker 3: was done by design. There's a discussion by him of
Speaker 3: the dialectical clash of East and West and the Cold War,
Speaker 3: perhaps leading to a fall of both into a new
Speaker 3: world order that didn't end up happening. Instead, we got
Speaker 3: the victory of Western liberal democratic capitalism, whatever the heck
Speaker 3: that is. But he says that the real focus of
Speaker 3: the future, won't you give you that stuff. It's going
Speaker 3: to be microchips, biotech and GMOs again way ahead of
Speaker 3: his time with that one. He says that we're emerging
Speaker 3: into a new hyper industrial order. So he just like
Speaker 3: Klaus and Davos crew right Fourth Industrial Revolution, he's talking
Speaker 3: about the same thing as Klaus. There, inequality will cleave
Speaker 3: to this new world o rder, just as the Berlin
Speaker 3: Wall once divided east and West, he says, So in
Speaker 3: the future, there's still going to be a cleavage of inequality,
Speaker 3: but it won't be geographical east and west of the
Speaker 3: Berlin Wall. It'll be super elites with money versus the
Speaker 3: masses of those that don't have money. How do we
Speaker 3: determine who will be the super elite with money? It
Speaker 3: will be whoever has controlling interests in whatever the money
Speaker 3: of the future is. Is essentially what he says. He
Speaker 3: doesn't say that in explicit terms, because again he doesn't
Speaker 3: know what bitcoin is. But if you believe in bitcoin,
Speaker 3: then that's what he's that's what he's looking for, right,
Speaker 3: Like the Pagans in Acts seventeen groping in the dark.
Speaker 3: He doesn't know, but he's like, whatever in the future
Speaker 3: ends up being the solution to money and money power
Speaker 3: will be that. Now. I have this analogy I came
Speaker 3: up with that was fitting, I think, and it's I
Speaker 3: love that scene in the New Dune right Doom too,
Speaker 3: where they're trying to figure out how they're gonna beat
Speaker 3: shut on the fourth and the Harconans and and uh
Speaker 3: Gurney and and uh Paul are like, well, of course
Speaker 3: we do have that giant stash of the Atradees' family warheads,
Speaker 3: and the freemen are all like, the what the heck
Speaker 3: is that now in the future which is already beginning
Speaker 3: to emerge. If you want your version of the inheritance
Speaker 3: of the Atradees' family money warheads, how many BTC do
Speaker 3: you have? That's what I'm talking about. Do you see
Speaker 3: my analogy that's gonna be the thing of the future, right,
Speaker 3: Do you understand it's difficult already to become a whole coiner.
Speaker 3: How much more difficult will it be to become a
Speaker 3: whole coiner when it's five hundred thousand dollars per bitcoin?
Speaker 3: What about when it hits one million dollars a bitcoin?
Speaker 3: What about when it hits ten million dollars per bitcoin
Speaker 3: fifteen twenty years from now? Now? Of course, true, the
Speaker 3: dollars devalued, so that doesn't necessarily mean that it has
Speaker 3: the same purchasing power per se, but it just depends.
Speaker 3: There's no You're not going to stop this. This is
Speaker 3: the money of the future, and people still haven't figured
Speaker 3: it out yet, And don't listen to the dummies in
Speaker 3: the chat have no idea what it is and what
Speaker 3: it ain't. Really Loo put you Yeah, can you touch
Speaker 3: the app on your phone for your bank?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 3: Do you see the money when you transfer it on zell?
Speaker 3: Do you touch it?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 3: So enough of these uh, low low tier boomer arguments.
Speaker 3: Now back to Italy. How many tradees, nuclear economic warheads?
Speaker 3: Do you have the revolutions? He I didn't even here's
Speaker 3: a color revolution I forgot about. He says that we've
Speaker 3: just seen the success, apparently of Europe's remarkable Velvet Revolution.
Speaker 3: So this was the CIA's color revolution in Czechoslovakia, known
Speaker 3: as the Velvet Revolution. It is one I told the
Speaker 3: color reolution I totally forgot. This led to the opening
Speaker 3: up of the economy there to a market economy. And
Speaker 3: then he says that a future of successful color revolutions
Speaker 3: might occur. Some of them did, of course in Ukraine
Speaker 3: it was the Orange Revolution. By the way, that doesn't
Speaker 3: mean we want to go back to some Soviet thing.
Speaker 3: It just means that amazingly Atali cases this out like
Speaker 3: it's a dialectical conflict between East and West Soviet versus
Speaker 3: Western capitalist and to those who are of the higher
Speaker 3: order of this kind of international stuff, they seem to
Speaker 3: kind of have this spoken slash unspoken secret that it
Speaker 3: doesn't really matter which thing emerged under the Cold War,
Speaker 3: either of these systems will be the placeholder. It will
Speaker 3: be the phase before we go to the full on nWo.
Speaker 3: So if the Soviets had ended up winning in that experiment,
Speaker 3: then we would have had a Soviet dominated technocracy. That's
Speaker 3: why we saw a lot of hd Wells, bertrand Russell
Speaker 3: right early on. They were saying, Hey, the Soviet experiment
Speaker 3: is running wonderfully. Maybe that's the model of the future
Speaker 3: technocratic governance, right, That's why Russell says that it's Plato's Republic,
Speaker 3: plato Republic, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Did you even
Speaker 3: know the USSR Socialist Republic? There is an even more
Speaker 3: ominous and less visible threat on the rise and has
Speaker 3: to do with a very warp and woof of the nWo.
Speaker 3: It's liberal ideology of consumerism and pluralism. The essence about
Speaker 3: democracy and the market is choice. But what happens when
Speaker 3: choice is not given and available to all people? He
Speaker 3: says that the system might begin to crack when it's
Speaker 3: realized that there's not actually choice, And he says that
Speaker 3: really the whole system is grounded on a nihilistic indifference
Speaker 3: and the cult of immediacy, which is I thought was interesting.
Speaker 3: That's true. I agree there is a cult of immediacy,
Speaker 3: which is but technology provides this convenience, and it's great
Speaker 3: to have that efficiency and the convenience. However, there's a
Speaker 3: trade off because when you trade off everything for convenience
Speaker 3: and immediacy, oftentimes we're actually trading off a lot of
Speaker 3: good things too, So we're trading our privacy nowadays for
Speaker 3: a lot of convenience and immediacy. We're trading local business
Speaker 3: for the convenience and immediacy of Jeffrey buzz Os and
Speaker 3: his drone army that's going to bring the packages right,
Speaker 3: rather than driving to the local business to buy these
Speaker 3: things so that we can save a dollar and give
Speaker 3: the oligarchs of Silicon Valley more and more power control.
Speaker 3: And he says, you know, all of this might collapse
Speaker 3: into a possible nihilistic revolt. Interesting he doesn't say exactly
Speaker 3: who would revolt, but I think he thinks maybe the
Speaker 3: the poorer classes. But of course if they revolt, right,
Speaker 3: they're not going to revolt against the actual people in control.
Speaker 3: They're going to revolt against people that they are duped
Speaker 3: into revolting against, like the local business owner who makes
Speaker 3: two hundred thousand dollars a year. As if that's the
Speaker 3: person who's like, you know, the elite. Okay, now, that's
Speaker 3: not the elite. I mean, that's who employs and gives
Speaker 3: jobs to people in the local community. Amazingly, he says
Speaker 3: the culture of choice must not be allowed to embrace
Speaker 3: processes that would transform life itself through tinkering with human
Speaker 3: DNA and destroying the genetic heritage of the human rights,
Speaker 3: the diverse genetic characters. Well, that's fascinating. So Jacques Attalie
Speaker 3: almost sounds like he's warning against transhumanism and genetic manipulation
Speaker 3: where and that's quite a change from what he's pushing
Speaker 3: in two thousand and six. So he's a lot more
Speaker 3: are cautious and dare we say, almost traditional in ways
Speaker 3: in this nineteen ninety one book versus his two thousand
Speaker 3: and six book, which says that transhumanism is the tip
Speaker 3: of the spear of Then wo he cites of all people. Well, no,
Speaker 3: let me rephrase this. He says that we can never
Speaker 3: allow the biological limitations or borders to be overrun or destroyed.
Speaker 3: The great paradox of global consumer democracy is that the
Speaker 3: rights to pleasure and happiness might be a toxic elixir
Speaker 3: we are forcing our children to drink. Amazing. Wow, that
Speaker 3: sounds like us, because this is the point we make
Speaker 3: oftentimes to libertarians when we're debating from whence view derived
Speaker 3: these idea of rights. Perhaps there are rights, but on
Speaker 3: what grounds and in your system, what's the justification for rights?
Speaker 3: Especially since many of you are low tier reddit level atheists.
Speaker 3: Where in any sense at all do you imagine that
Speaker 3: there's a right if we are matter in motion? This
Speaker 3: is fiction. Where do we get rights to choice and
Speaker 3: pleasure and consumption? Well, these are just assumed. Ottily says,
Speaker 3: we're gonna have to have a new definition of the sacred. Well,
Speaker 3: I agree, like it seems like modern society has actually
Speaker 3: divested itself from the sacred. Attily notices that, but of
Speaker 3: course there's no such thing as inventing a new definition
Speaker 3: of it. You can't invent new definitions just be made up.
Speaker 3: So Atali's a secular sort of materialist approach, pragmatic approach
Speaker 3: to these questions is not going to get us anywhere.
Speaker 3: I mean, to be honest with you, this first chapter
Speaker 3: it sounds like Jordan Peterson. I mean, you got some
Speaker 3: interesting insights. I wouldn't say it's as right wing as
Speaker 3: quote unquote right wing as Jordan Peterson, but it sounds
Speaker 3: like a chapter that Jordan Peterson could write. And then
Speaker 3: he says, look, let's go back to history and see
Speaker 3: if we can do some archaeology of ideas to find
Speaker 3: some historical forms and structures. Now, this chapter again, it
Speaker 3: was actually fairly fascinating. It's a great insight into the
Speaker 3: mind of the global elite about how they view things.
Speaker 3: And in every global leite text, almost all them. Right,
Speaker 3: we get the same process, right, we have to do
Speaker 3: the same thing where we have to go through the history,
Speaker 3: and really what it ends up being is the global
Speaker 3: elite storytelling. Right, we need the history lesson from them,
Speaker 3: and then they give us the storytelling, which allows them
Speaker 3: to then posit that their version of where we're going
Speaker 3: in the nWo is the only rational one to go into.
Speaker 3: He says, history tells us that man has these sort
Speaker 3: of stages and these these sort of phases, and he
Speaker 3: says that we're going to look at social forms and
Speaker 3: the myths that cultures utilize to create social cohesion. And
Speaker 3: he says the first thing that happens is that they
Speaker 3: invent and make up hierarchy. I would say that's true
Speaker 3: right from a historical perspective, And I don't think all
Speaker 3: hierarchy is invented, but there is a sense in which
Speaker 3: hierarchy is natural, is what we're saying. Right, And this
Speaker 3: again sounds kind of like, yeah, I think you could
Speaker 3: say he's probably red Fuco. He probably read a Twain
Speaker 3: Bee Fucou, you know, outlines of history, as she wells.
Speaker 3: I'm sure he's read all these people to kind of
Speaker 3: put together this journey. Probably a Goose. Compte has the
Speaker 3: same idea, like progressing civilizations and ages of man. It's
Speaker 3: kind of arbitrary, but he says, so basically, mankind develops
Speaker 3: hierarchies in order to have a functioning society. They make
Speaker 3: up categories and value and distinction. So this kind of
Speaker 3: sounds almost like Nietzsche, right. They also come up with
Speaker 3: a annointed king or prince who has the monopoly of violence. Here,
Speaker 3: he sounds like a libertarian. They place this right of
Speaker 3: justice and violence in this single ruler, and then we
Speaker 3: get the investiture of violence. Then violence gets managed by
Speaker 3: also the priest class. So the priest class rises is
Speaker 3: very Nietzschean. The priest class also kind of competes with
Speaker 3: or synthesizes with, synergize is with the prince. He calls
Speaker 3: this prince a priest and prince a prince and priest here,
Speaker 3: and we're not talking about prince like purple rain, purple reign,
Speaker 3: purple rain, purple rain. R E I. G. N oh,
Speaker 3: get it, Prince and priest, get it purple rain. I'll
Speaker 3: make it rain underneath my reign. Elect me and you'll
Speaker 3: be rich. I'll make it rain underneath my purple rain.
Speaker 3: By the way, you would like you share it. WelCom everybody, then,
Speaker 3: he says. The priest class was also perceptive in that
Speaker 3: an orderly society. He seems to say, they made it
Speaker 3: up needed the idea of sacrifice. We need sacrifice and scapegoats.
Speaker 3: Scapegoats might be the center, the enemy, tribes, the you
Speaker 3: know Whoever, the problem of the society is escapegoat, he says, Really,
Speaker 3: this is all mythology that the priests repeat to control society.
Speaker 3: The notion of the sacred, then, is intimately tied into
Speaker 3: this power structure that brings order to violence to control society.
Speaker 3: Ever since the first sedentary social forms, perhaps say ten
Speaker 3: thousand years ago, there have been free ways to control
Speaker 3: man's violence. The religious control, the military control, and the
Speaker 3: economic control. The first, the religious mediates man's relationship with
Speaker 3: nature and the fact of his death, the second the
Speaker 3: relationship between the social forms that is the military, and
Speaker 3: the third the economic. With each of the social forms,
Speaker 3: these three ways control violence and thus define the order
Speaker 3: corresponding to various types of social forms or social structures.
Speaker 3: These orders, which can in turn be called the orders
Speaker 3: of sacred, force and money. Sacred force and money the
Speaker 3: three key elements here. Multiple forms of order and sacred
Speaker 3: continue up into the present day as well. However, the
Speaker 3: modern forms have seen religious power displaced by the political
Speaker 3: and the economic. So political economy has replaced the religious power.
Speaker 3: Thus today we essentially have no sacred The sacred has
Speaker 3: no power, but without the sacred, there is no power,
Speaker 3: and so other entities are actually invested with sacred power.
Speaker 3: He says, if you go back to ancient worldviews, these
Speaker 3: were all integrated. For example, all of life was divine,
Speaker 3: part of the divine mythos, a manifestation of the divine.
Speaker 3: For example, animism, you saw every object has a spirit
Speaker 3: that in dwells it. The eating of flesh and animals,
Speaker 3: and perhaps even cannibalism was part of this perpetual cycle
Speaker 3: of nature. This is a very again, very Fucao, very
Speaker 3: Nietzsche type of analysis. Everything was seen and subsumed under
Speaker 3: the order of the sacred in a unified, holistic worldview. Thus,
Speaker 3: nothing whether it's birth, death, art, or life is not
Speaker 3: a part of this worldview. Today, we've moved away from
Speaker 3: that worldview where animism he's just calling animism any kind
Speaker 3: of religious worldview that sees everything as in some sense
Speaker 3: related to her own by the divine or sacred. Now
Speaker 3: the sacred has been replaced with products. I'd say that's true.
Speaker 3: So now we've moved away from animism to where sacred
Speaker 3: objects are now consumable products. And he says this is
Speaker 3: a natural outworking of the rule of money. Once we
Speaker 3: transition to the money power in modernity, post capitalism, he saying,
Speaker 3: then we no longer see these things as sacred because
Speaker 3: they're not in any sense related to a transcendent. They
Speaker 3: only have the human horizontal plane relative value insofar as
Speaker 3: they're useful to humans. Thus, no transcendent here doesn't mean
Speaker 3: that there can't be. It's just saying that this is
Speaker 3: the attitude, the modus operandi of the system. That's all
Speaker 3: you say. He says, Thus capitalism is rise to efficiency,
Speaker 3: immediacy and streamlining or the Burnham type stuff managerial elite,
Speaker 3: et cetera, tailorism. And he says we can look back
Speaker 3: in fact to market forms. Capitalism is the ninth form.
Speaker 3: I don't know where he came up, but he just
Speaker 3: sort of came up with these forms. He says, there's
Speaker 3: not and we're in the ninth and he's going to
Speaker 3: list these in a minute. At the center of each
Speaker 3: of these forms or phases is a dominant city state,
Speaker 3: and these city states are ruled by elites that define
Speaker 3: the ideology of the city state. In fact, religious revolutions
Speaker 3: are oftentimes a determining factor in the power structure of
Speaker 3: these elite city states. Now, notice this is one of
Speaker 3: the global elite telling you that the global elite rule
Speaker 3: from city states. Is he a conspiracy theorist, No, he's
Speaker 3: one of the global elite. He's the kissinger of friends
Speaker 3: telling you what I say. Each market form uses technology
Speaker 3: that is more efficient than the predecessors in utilizing energy
Speaker 3: and organizing communication. A form is stable in so long
Speaker 3: as it creates enough wealth to maintain the demand for
Speaker 3: its products. When it begins to falter or is hampered,
Speaker 3: this market form weakens and gives way to the next.
Speaker 3: Thus there's an intimate connection between money, power and tech.
Speaker 3: Then he says, the newest form that comes when a
Speaker 3: new form organizes will be a new center. When technology
Speaker 3: here is and social relations allow for competing businesses on
Speaker 3: the market to replace non market services by a new
Speaker 3: mass product object. The market will then obey and new
Speaker 3: added value. Mark Carney, one dollar. I work in cybersecurity.
Speaker 3: I know bitcoin is auditible and traceable. Yeah, I'm aware
Speaker 3: of the public ledger. And he says it is not
Speaker 3: a good currency. It is a good store of wealth.
Speaker 3: I understand that. But you can have something else that's
Speaker 3: a layer two, or you can have something else that's
Speaker 3: a stable coin, or the dollar can continue to exist
Speaker 3: but be backed by something like bitcoin, so it doesn't
Speaker 3: have to be the day to day thing itself. It
Speaker 3: can just be the backing for whatever. The day to
Speaker 3: day thing is a digital dollar or something like that.
Speaker 3: So I'm aware of that. But also the fact that
Speaker 3: it's decentralized and that it's a public ledger. It means
Speaker 3: that it is audible and traceable in the sense of
Speaker 3: like bad actors. But also a lot of these entities
Speaker 3: that would do this right, they might not be here
Speaker 3: in ten or fifteen years or twenty years. The eight forms.
Speaker 3: I'm sorry I missed, Philip, Philip Edenhorn, this is the
Speaker 3: top ten global elite streams thank you this one, or
Speaker 3: you mean that you want a top ten global league.
Speaker 3: Mg sends three dollars and says, I just want to
Speaker 3: hear that sweet song. Yeah, exactly, let's here it ready.
Speaker 3: Next up is the eight forms after the song. From
Speaker 3: the thirteenth century to now, eight successive forms have emerged. Again.
Speaker 3: I have no idea where he gets I guess he's
Speaker 3: just picking the eight most powerful city states from thirteen hundred.
Speaker 3: Why he picks thirteen hundred, I don't know. Bruges thirteen hundred,
Speaker 3: Venice fourteen fifty and to A fifteen hundred, Genoa fifteen fifty,
Speaker 3: Amsterdam sixteen fifty, London seventeen fifty, Boston basting retired eighteen eighty,
Speaker 3: and Nu Yak thirteen thirty I'm sorry nineteen thirty. So
Speaker 3: basically saying that we're kind of at the end of
Speaker 3: the New York dominant New York Wall Street dollar dominance era.
Speaker 3: As technology progresses and is invented, production improves in society
Speaker 3: is able to then cut the costs of goods and services,
Speaker 3: and whoever is better at that becomes the new center
Speaker 3: of power of the city states. Notice that he doesn't
Speaker 3: say it's nation states, it's these powerful city centers New York, London, etc.
Speaker 3: He says, each time there's a new form, it reduces
Speaker 3: the power of the family in the previous form. Interesting.
Speaker 3: A world of comedy, a world economy always has an
Speaker 3: urban center of gravity, a city that is the logistics
Speaker 3: and heart of this activity. Dominant cities do not dominate forever.
Speaker 3: They're eventually replaced by another. And what determines that? Apparently
Speaker 3: it is tech. The essential question must be answered, well,
Speaker 3: who decides what region or city becomes the center? A
Speaker 3: city becomes the center when it's constellation of industrial and
Speaker 3: political elites organize themselves around a cultural project and harness
Speaker 3: the resources to develop new technologies for faster and better means.
Speaker 3: This is going to be a key element, I believe
Speaker 3: in determining who will have power in the future. The
Speaker 3: new petro dollar is a CBDC. None of that's going
Speaker 3: to work. I mean a CBDC that they put out
Speaker 3: is just going to be another It's going to be
Speaker 3: an electronic fiat. How is that going to be any better?
Speaker 3: An electronic fiat will probably be worse than a physical fiat.
Speaker 3: This is not fiat it's opposite of that. Now listen
Speaker 3: to this. What is the form that rules where we
Speaker 3: are now? Well, where we are now in this New
Speaker 3: York post New York nineteen thirties era, get this, material
Speaker 3: abundance and geographical advantage rarely amount to what makes for
Speaker 3: the key city center. So what is it then, that
Speaker 3: allows for certain cities to arise? It's not the answer
Speaker 3: I expected. You might think, well, physical location or material abundance,
Speaker 3: and he saying, no, it's not actually that. This is
Speaker 3: his thesis. What allows a certain region or city to
Speaker 3: arise to become one of these key centers is rather
Speaker 3: that it avoids becoming entangled in wars. Foreign entanglements bleed
Speaker 3: the rivals and allows the city that doesn't get involved
Speaker 3: to become the center. Isn't it interesting that what allowed
Speaker 3: America to become what it was the world power non interventionism,
Speaker 3: not becoming entangled in all these wars which drains and
Speaker 3: destroys the country. To prop up this ridiculous form of
Speaker 3: a form of imperialism is the only way to put it.
Speaker 3: And by the way, it is that Brazinski calls it the
Speaker 3: American Empire, that, by the way, was all designed by
Speaker 3: the CFR. The CFRs who decided to turn America away
Speaker 3: from a protectionist, non interventionist power into a global police,
Speaker 3: international interventionist powerfr achieved that in the nineteen twenties, that transition,
Speaker 3: that was their key function under Rockefeller another oligarchs, and
Speaker 3: that's why we're in this situation that we're in. The
Speaker 3: Second World War was the midwife of the New York
Speaker 3: dominant Wall Street market form. The desire of families and homemaking,
Speaker 3: desire of families for homemaking durables was met by this
Speaker 3: Keynesian New deal social spending policy of the post war period.
Speaker 3: And what is kanesianism Fabian socialist economics. Milton Keynes was
Speaker 3: a Fabian. All of the institutions post World War Two
Speaker 3: that were set up, you might think, were they communists,
Speaker 3: were they capitalists? No, dummies, They're both. It's called Fabian
Speaker 3: social which is the merger of monopoly capital and communism,
Speaker 3: known as reform Marxism or Fabian socialism. And literally all
Speaker 3: of the post World War two institutions that exist now today,
Speaker 3: the IMF, the World Bank, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera, they are
Speaker 3: Keynesian institutions. That's the world that we live under. In fact,
Speaker 3: there's a whole list of these institutions in the book,
Speaker 3: and that's because all of these British elites that set
Speaker 3: this up were all part of this same structure. The
Speaker 3: Royal Instagram National Affairs was created under the leadership of
Speaker 3: Lionel Curtis and was structured by Fabians like R. H. Tawney,
Speaker 3: John MAYNERD. Kaines, Philip Noel Barker, as well as Fabian
Speaker 3: collaborators and synthesizers like the London School of Economics professor
Speaker 3: Arnold Toynbee, who became the director of Chatham House. Thus,
Speaker 3: all of these institutions that were set up, League of Nations,
Speaker 3: United Nations, Area CFR, Socialist League, World Bank, International Monetary Fund,
Speaker 3: Aspen Institute, World Council, Churches, NATO, Builderberg, they're literally all
Speaker 3: set up by Fabian socialists. It's not even that hard
Speaker 3: to figure this out. It's not even like controversial, and
Speaker 3: that book is way better and more modern and updated.
Speaker 3: This is just the older version of this history. And
Speaker 3: people are all confused about this because they think that
Speaker 3: it's like classical Marxism. It's not classical Marxism. Okay, it's
Speaker 3: not anti capital, it's Marxism that's pro capital and allied
Speaker 3: with it, and atally admits that Ghess, that is the
Speaker 3: structure of the existing order. Now he says that the competition,
Speaker 3: and I guess that's why he has this weird woodcut.
Speaker 3: I mean, it looks like a durera. I don't know
Speaker 3: what it is. But this is like two guys competing,
Speaker 3: So I guess this is about competition. Now, this next
Speaker 3: chapter is where he gets things wrong. There's a couple
Speaker 3: of insights in the chapter though, because he says, for example,
Speaker 3: the very beginning that our system is based on pluralism,
Speaker 3: that is the system of a liberal markets, democratic open
Speaker 3: liberal markets. It requires pluralism. He says, we could describe
Speaker 3: this as a pyramid with two pillars. I kid you not.
Speaker 3: This is his Masonic terminology. He says, the world structure
Speaker 3: is like a pyramid with two pillars. Oh, I'm sorry, Jaka,
Speaker 3: are you an idiot conspiracy theorist? Because anyone else where
Speaker 3: to say this they would be immediately deemed as an
Speaker 3: idiot conspiracy is Yet when you say it using your
Speaker 3: obvious Masonic imagery. And by the way, Grand Orient Freemasonry
Speaker 3: has always been very powerful in France and most of
Speaker 3: its leaders and presidents are members of the Grand Orient Lodge,
Speaker 3: et cetera. He says, the world order in the Cold
Speaker 3: War can be described as a pyramid with two pillars.
Speaker 3: The pyramid is the shape that is taken by the
Speaker 3: eighth market form, which is the dollar. It is the
Speaker 3: petro dollar, the universal international currency that presently rules, and
Speaker 3: the two pillars are the main maintenance of the dialectics
Speaker 3: of global order of the US and the USSR. However,
Speaker 3: this one pillar of the USSR has just collapsed. This
Speaker 3: will now give America the opportunity to become the center again.
Speaker 3: He says. There's two competitors to America that might displace
Speaker 3: America as the center. He says, those competitives, and this
Speaker 3: is where he's wrong. These competitors for the next few
Speaker 3: decades will be Japan and the EU. Okay, Well, that
Speaker 3: didn't happen. In fact, four years after this book, Japan's
Speaker 3: economy collapsed into what's called the Lost Decades. Over the
Speaker 3: period of nineteen ninety five to twenty twenty three, Japan's
Speaker 3: GDP fell from five trillion to four trillion real wages
Speaker 3: fell eleven percent the lost decades. So perhaps americanists understood
Speaker 3: that the threat of Japan and I remember in the
Speaker 3: nineties there were these books that were coming out, There
Speaker 3: were books coming out about the rise of Japan, the
Speaker 3: threat of Japanese, you know, economy to the West and whatever.
Speaker 3: But whatever happened, however this occurred, I don't know all
Speaker 3: the details of this. Enough happened such that Japan was
Speaker 3: definitely emasculated and cuc k ed into being essentially unable
Speaker 3: to have population below replacement population levels. And I guess
Speaker 3: essentially the toxic culture that was exporter was enough to
Speaker 3: do this. I don't know, I don't know exactly. I'm
Speaker 3: not I don't know enough about Japanese geopolitics to say.
Speaker 3: But he says that the other competitor would be the EU.
Speaker 3: That didn't work, That EU has not become a competitor
Speaker 3: to America, So exactly where that's going to go, I
Speaker 3: don't know. However, he says that the dream of the
Speaker 3: EU in nineteen ninety one would perhaps be that it
Speaker 3: could step forward to become a competitor. Unfortunately, it turns out,
Speaker 3: as even Atali says, Japan just like Japan. Europe's replacement
Speaker 3: population levels are not enough to even give it that
Speaker 3: status anymore. And he's writing prior to all of the
Speaker 3: non Europeans suddenly entering Europe in the past twenty years.
Speaker 3: So Atli got all of that very wrong. However, he
Speaker 3: was perceptive enough to realize that population displacement is more
Speaker 3: than sufficient to erode the nation state, combined with the
Speaker 3: power of the nomadic device, which severs from one's par family, tradition, etc.
Speaker 3: So that's the first half of the very insightful geopolitical
Speaker 3: text from Jack at the book Millennium. It's a very
Speaker 3: quick read. It's only one hundred pages, and so in
Speaker 3: the next couple of days I will have the part
Speaker 3: two up. On a reminder to you guys that I
Speaker 3: did get Part two of the Sexpionage History book up.
Speaker 3: The book is complete. You can watch the part two
Speaker 3: over here on rockfin or you can subscribe at Jayson
Speaker 3: Analysis to get access to the archives of the last
Speaker 3: ten years of deep geopolitical analysis, theology, book reports, book reviews, analyses,
Speaker 3: et cetera, debates, lectures, the rest of the Global Elite
Speaker 3: book series. You can get all that in the archives
Speaker 3: at Jays Analysis for four nine five a month sixty
Speaker 3: dollars a year. You subscribe in the show description at
Speaker 3: the links, or you can subscribe to the same material
Speaker 3: over here on rock Fin. Rock Finn is a great
Speaker 3: free speech based platform. Either way has its advantages. Not
Speaker 3: everything is over on Rockfin makes it very easy. However,
Speaker 3: not everything in the last ten years of my work
Speaker 3: is over on Rockfin. A lot of it is, but
Speaker 3: still not everything. It takes a long time to get
Speaker 3: it all over there, so I'd say about seventy percent
Speaker 3: of it is over there. We got a nice sizable
Speaker 3: audience over there on x Thank you guys for watching
Speaker 3: live over there. That's the first time we've multi streamed.
Speaker 3: I can't believe it all worked. We multi streamed over
Speaker 3: on Twitch too. I have an old Twitch channel that
Speaker 3: I resurrected. Guys who would like and share, remember to
Speaker 3: get tickets to our event. Also, I have a show sponsor,
Speaker 3: and that is chalk dot Com. If you head on
Speaker 3: over to chalk dot com, you can use a promo
Speaker 3: co j forty four life to get access to the
Speaker 3: best and supplementation that's out there. They have a hyper
Speaker 3: super stringent process for making sure that the products are pure.
Speaker 3: They derived a lot of these from the Amazon. It's
Speaker 3: a very serious red pill base company. Chalk dot Com
Speaker 3: is the best when it comes to all of these products.
Speaker 3: You can get the male Vitality Stack that pops up
Speaker 3: right away if you see this right here at the
Speaker 3: performance stack. You get the Chad mode and yes it
Speaker 3: actually has the Chad meme dude right there. You do
Speaker 3: not pay that full amount. You pay a discounted amount
Speaker 3: much better than fifteen percent off. You pay the discount.
Speaker 3: I don't want this website.
Speaker 1: Sector.
Speaker 3: Here we go. You pay forty four off of that
Speaker 3: one seventy four if you want to get the performance that.
Speaker 3: But you can also buy individual products. You just sign
Speaker 3: up for J forty four Life. That's Jay four four
Speaker 3: la Fe and you will get that coming every month.
Speaker 3: And I guarantee you you're gonna want Chalk coming on
Speaker 3: a monthly basis. It's not just for dudes though, there's
Speaker 3: also products for ladies. Ladies if you want, you know, oshwaganda,
Speaker 3: that's great for regulating your moods if you have these
Speaker 3: kind of female mood swings. I don't know if you
Speaker 3: know that, but ladies do have female mood swings, especially
Speaker 3: if they are dealing with the astrogns. There's also the
Speaker 3: Irish Moss which is good for that. There's also the
Speaker 3: Seven Wonders which is great for mineral deficiencies. So get
Speaker 3: all those products over at chalk dot com, c HQ
Speaker 3: dot com. Also, and there's the Ladies Stack. You don't
Speaker 3: have to get. It's not just men's stuff. There's also
Speaker 3: female Vitality right here, Female Vitality Stack, and make use
Speaker 3: of those promo codes to get that great discount, and
Speaker 3: you can you can cancel at any time, so although
Speaker 3: you are subscribing, if you ever need to cancel, it's
Speaker 3: very easy to do that. You can cancel at any
Speaker 3: time over at chalk dot com. Remember to get tickets
Speaker 3: to our live event over at event bright, otherwise I
Speaker 3: will see