Speaker 1: The the, the the.
Speaker 2: The the the distant to the the the the the.
Speaker 1: The the.
Speaker 2: The the.
Speaker 1: The the the the.
Speaker 2: The the the the the the the the the the
don't they do the.
Speaker 3: The the.
Speaker 2: The the the the the the the the the the
the the the the the the the the the the
the the the.
Speaker 3: The the the the the the.
Speaker 2: The the the the the the the the.
Speaker 3: The all right, welcome, welcome. I can't believe that the
tech work that smooth and that easily. In fact, I
don't think that's ever happened before. I've got mamnuka honey coffee,
so hopefully we won't be caught by any throat aids
and coffin fits. By the way, a coffin fit is
not what Dracula has when he has a temper tantrum.
That's a coffin fit. A coffin fit is when I
start a coffin and it is the pollen in the
air of this region. But thank you, thank you to
all the online chat doctors who diagnose me on a
never ending basis. I'm drinking my double shot of espresso
and separately, as a bevers goblin. I've also got my
goblet of ever, effervescence, effervescent, evanescence.
Speaker 4: Save me from the nothing, I bea come work with
open so got waker save me?
Speaker 3: And no, I don't like that song. The only songs
I like are Juggalo songs. By the way, we got
a we got a couple of new items over here.
Check this out, Check this out? Why's this?
Speaker 1: You ready got.
Speaker 3: Rid of that stupid zombie? Got a dollar signing up there?
Storm the cast says for ten dollars. I noticed that
the hat Man looks like Saturn. I wonder there's a
connection between him and Molock. I mentioned this on Cotel,
but he wasn't aware of the hat Man. The hat
Man is an entity that people believe they see or
appear to see or see, particularly when they do extremely
high doses of menadrol, which is completely stupid. But there
are idiots who will do anything like that because the
Internet has threads talking about doing that, and they get
the idea to take these ridiculously high doses of minadrol,
which is the dumbest thing ever. And the people that
get close enough to the edge of doom, we'll say,
when they do this, they see this man and there's
a bunch of people that record this, so it's supposedly
not a single person. It's like multiple people's accounts of
the hat Man. And that has nothing to do with
what we're talking about today. But the question came in,
and it seems to quite obviously be a demon or
something akin to that. Right, it's this thing. They see
this figure over here creeping. They see this pervy little
figure over here, this little pervy man creeping on. I'm
looking at peeping in the window. And there we go.
Got me a nice little smooth house beat for them
super chats, you know I'm talking about. It's not really
a house beat. It's more like a chill trance beat
going anyway. So I like, this is a funny T
shirt here. I can't take Benader because I owe the
hat Man money. I don't want to see him. So
my obvious assessment was that this is obviously some type
of demonic entity. And I wonder if certain demonic entities
are unique to certain substances. I don't know, just kind
of a suspicion speculation, but that's what I was referring
to the hat Man. Now, somebody said, is there a
reference to Saturn? Well, could just be a an entity
or demon or an angel of death that appears. But also,
as I was on one of the Psychedelic Bros. Interviews
last night, we had a good interview who's asking questions
about orthodoxy. His name's Float Universe. He's got a pretty
decent sized Instagram page. We did an interview last night
last night. Hen'll post that today, I imagine, and we
got into this topic and my assessment, my theory is
that people in different cultures, in terms of the religious
programming that they're raised with, they will see the entities
if they're in a drug trance or if or whatever,
according to their cultural programming, shall we say so, In
other words, they'll see if they've been raised to think
that lizards are the manifestation of the evil God, then
they will see demons as lizard men. Right, So it's
culturally relative in the sense that the appearance of the
entity will be relative to that culture. It's a demon still,
but demons can wear different masks, right, So they might
appear to another tribe under the mask of the moon
God or whatever, but it's still the same entity behind
the manifestation. So it's entirely possible. Then that the hat
man who appears to the people who are on the
brink of doom, shall we say, of the very high
doses of that could be one of these types of entities.
Obviously demon. Nobody describes the encounter with hat Man as
anything positive. It's a feeling of dread, terror, fear. It's
a demon. That's good, obvious dude.
Speaker 1: It's not even like the.
Speaker 3: So I'm having fun with this new sou preach out here.
Let's try this one again, another.
Speaker 5: One, Low Pan, Lo Pan, Low Pan miss, how about that?
Speaker 3: We did not not contact you, lil miss about that?
Until what does he said? I'm trying to think of, Lope,
I forgot, Low Pans lines. You are not something you
were not called upon to get it. You want not
caught up to get it? About that? Yeah, I know,
I know. I'm sorry, Low Pan says, if you haven't
looked at the book Trilateral Commission and Global Governance nineteen
seventy to nineteen eighty by Rutlish Press, interesting, I did
just get the Rutledge official publication on the history of Tavistock.
I did not know that there was a Dino Newts
and PhD thesis uh printed by Rutlish Publishers, which is
academic publishing. I will definitely get that. Thank you for
that remind you're there, and that reminds me I forgot this.
Doozy also arrived, which came in a big, old, giant version.
I didn't know I was going to get the blind
Boomer edition of The Fabian Freeway. So this is a
classic too, and it will actually be relevant to today's
global elite text uh from Jacques Attali. But this is
of course the classic, famous history on the Fabian Society
by Rose Martin, and it's gonna be relevant because I
believe it or not, Jacques will bring it up, not
that book, but he will bring it up some of
the key Fabian developments.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 3: For those who are also curious as to what I'm wearing,
shout out to my mom. She chose the coolest T
shirt I've seen in a long time. I'm out of
bubble gum, so she got me an awesome that they
live rowdy Roddy Piper T shirt. That's awesome John Carpenter's shirt.
Oh yeah. Also shout out to those who are the
small audience over on twitch. But I'm always happy to
expand the streaming to wherever we can and to ex Twitter.
I can't believe this worked. I spent the whole morning
making sure that I can multi stream, and of course
there's a lot of means and ways to do this.
Most people do it with stream Yard. I've still not
used Streamyard. I'm really wetted to. What happens is you
get really used to the tech that you've been using,
and so I'm really wetted to and used to what
I'm using. So I don't feel like the whole ordeal
of going through transitioning over to stream Yard and shout
out to stream Labs, because I've actually been making it
a lot better. Now that they have collab Cam, I
don't have to use stupid ass zoom anymore, and now
that they have the multi stream function, I don't have
to go full with freaking stream yard or restream whatever.
So it's good.
Speaker 1: It's good.
Speaker 3: When they initially released collab Cam, it didn't work, but
stream Yard excuse me, stream Labs has really up their
game and it's working great for me now. The only
problem is that I can't yet have a guest and
play a video, so that's one the one big advantage
that stream yard has that I think eventually maybe stream
labs will fix. But I'm really, I really am a
fan of stream streamlines. Of fact, I got a message
saying that last year I was in the top percentage
earners on stream labs. So shout out to the audience,
because you guys were the source of that. So I
was up there at the top of stream stream labs
last year. By the way, you can support via heading
over to the stream labs link right there in the
chat there or in the show description. You can send
a super chat at any time via stream labs. You
just click that link and it pulls up the stream
labs page. You put in your question, send whatever amount
and it will pop up on the screen. And I've
gotten rid of that as stupid as zombie gif. And
now we got our nango it needs to be I
wanted a bitcoin sign it instead of a dollar, but whatever,
we got some smooth chill house music. Travis sends ten
dollars and he says, let's go baby, Thank you so much, Anonymous.
Anonymous got the rave going in here. Three dollars JJJ.
Please do more streams on TikTok. By the way, you
can integrate TikTok. It looks like so I might try
to do that. Problem is, every time I try to
integrate and do these types of things on TikTok, everything
is banned. So you can get away with religious debates
pretty easily on there, But everybody in there's a just
such idiots. Man, It's like the dumbest people out there
on TikTok. So it's so trying do more uh TikTok
streams on internal monologues or the the Tussami guy. Uh
I follow that do? He followed me back too. I'll
try to find that. Would you debate mal passing in uh? Maybe?
I don't know. Uh, we got a debate coming up
in two days with the an Rand Institute or something,
the an Ran Institute's uh philosopher of uh transhumanism or whatever.
I've I was not familiar with this person. Yeah, Ron
Brooks and we will be debating this weekend over on
the large Baas redpil channel of our friend Jake Rattlesnake. So,
Jake's a cool dude. He's had Rachel on I'm gonna
be over there on Jake's channel eventually doing an interview
as well. And he's gonna be moderating the debate between
me and the an Rand Institute. Dude, So that should
be fun. He is an academic. I think he has
a degree. I don't. I'm not sure what his degree
is in. But should be a fun debate. The premise
is kan society be governed by science and reason alone?
And is transhumanism a good thing? Or what? Something like that?
All right, thank you for those superchats again, support the
stream Vias superchats. I'm so happy to get back to
the Global Elite book series because you know, that's that's
kind of in many ways. We got a few bread
and butters over here.
Speaker 2: We're out bread and boodle.
Speaker 3: Toos the gen That's what baby heeds me.
Speaker 1: I'm loving me.
Speaker 3: For some reason. In high school, when we would smoke
green things, I thought that was the funniest song ever.
I don't know why, me and my buddy Ben we
thought that was super funny. Like ninth grade, dude, I'm
talking ninth grade, Okay, I'm not talking senior year. I
don't know why. That is a ridiculous song though. And
you know we got a few. We've got a few
bread and butters, right, we got Hollywood we got Esoteric Hollywood.
Head on over to Jay's analysis in the shop. You
see the link right there, right And in the shop
you get signed copies of Esoteric Hollywood one and two,
the classics. You can also get the meta narratives over there.
You can also get the Big Fat Red Book, which
I'm right now sold out of, so those are on
order back order. You get signed copies in the shop. Anyway,
our bread and Butter is not just Hollywood. It's also
doing goofy things. Now we've integrated so called comedy. And
if you come to our live event, you will see
some of that so called comedy live at an event
where they have so called comedy with me my event
and Jamie's event. A lot of impressions, a lot of absurdities.
It is not the same as last year's. Last year,
if you don't know, my live events included me having
a debate with the Funko Pop. That was the live event,
and I won every debate by smashing the Funkle Pop
Gallagher style. So those who are fortunate enough to see
those live events got to see all that live at
an event. But we will be live in Las Vegas.
If you click in the show description or if you're
on my Twitter or whatever, you can click at the
top penned the event right link to get tickets. It's me,
It's Jamie Hanshaw, It's Isaac Weishap doing an entire talk
on iWatch Out. He's gonna have merch, he's gonna have
all his shiz knits there got made by Jim Bob
coming now, also doing a presentation. It's a mystery president.
I don't know what Jim Bob's gonna do. He's gonna
do some fun goofy stuff. And Jim Bob can sing.
Jim Gob that's a that's a dude that shows up
that mimics and mocks Jim Bob. There's Jim Bob and
there's Jim Goob, and that's like his ripoff dude who's
like his foil. I just made it up. Jim Bob
can sing, dance, he does Vegas showgirl stuff. I mean,
he does it all. Okay, so get your tickets right now,
June twenty second, that's what two weeks from now you got.
You barely got two weeks. Head on over there and
get those tickets and I just might forgive you. Okay,
Now you guys know one of the classics. The other
other Brendon Butter is the Global Elite book series, and
we've done many of these. I really won't want to
do Changing Images of Man, but there it's just so
you can't find a physical copy of it.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 3: I think the last Global Elite book series that we
were touching on and tackling was actually we could include
sex espionage in that even though it's not written by
a global elite man, it's written by just a normal historian.
We finished this last night and the part two went
out to all the subscribers, so yes, I did finally
finish this. I know it took a while, so if
you're over on Rock finis right here. Part two just
went up and we delved deep into the history of
how the elites control us through these types of operations.
We will also do the second analysis of this classic,
which is the same topic but much more recent with
jeff Stein mcgeffrey. And prior to those, the last Global
Elite texts that we've done was something in the vein
of really a continuation to Quickly, which was the Eawan
Rod to a book the Milliner Fabian Conspiracy. Hence why
Fabian freeway will fit very well with those texts. Now
we mentioned that Jecques Attalie is an important figure in
the previous talk where we covered his book Brief History
of the Future. That was one of our early global
elite text lectures. In this series, which is a never
ending series, there's always more writings of the elite to analyze,
to decode and to display before this lovely audience. Al
the Waugh, if you would it like and share? Where
is everybody what? There's nothing else to do. You need
to be here doing this, Okay, we need to be
understanding how the system operates, so you better get your
butt over here, sit down, get out your pen and paper,
get take notes. This is the first half of lecture.
Somebody said the other day do Jacques Attalie's first American
translated globalist book called Millennium? And I was like, oh,
that sounds interesting. Well I went and looked it up
and it's a very readable, accessible little text. And what
do we know, we got another global elite man up
here giving a blurb, Alvin Toffler. It's an unsettling, exhilarating,
scintillating work. Atli is always there to teach us with crackling,
creative intelligence crackling? How does creative intelligence crackle? I don't
know what that means, but it's odd choice of words.
But and then we got Arthur Schleisinger Atli's Millennium is
a fertile speculation of the things to come. And it's
called in its subtitle winners and losers looters. There's more
more accurate, right, IMF looters, Winners and IMF looters in
the coming world order. Now wait a minute, remember, for
decades there was no such thing as that, right, no NW.
And yet the global elite people were writing books about
the coming of What does that say? Oh, I don't
know what that minute. I don't know what that means.
It doesn't exist, even though I see it in front
of my face. It must not exist, because the authority
system and the authority structure that exists has told me
it doesn't exist, even though I'm reading right here that
does exist right in front of my face. But now,
this book came out in nineteen ninety one, so we
are what fifteen years prior to the famous Brief History
of the Future book that we reviewed many years ago,
six seven years ago, when we were beginning this series.
Of course, this series began with Doctor Carroll Quigley's Tragic
and Hope. We did Anglo American Establishment. Soon after we
did Marilyn Ferguson's Aquarian Conspiracy, which is not a conspiracy book.
Then we did Jacques Antele's Brief Hits in the Future
from two thousand and six. Well, it turns out Jacques,
who again is the Kissinger of France, Jacques Attali, Jique
and Monkey and then the Gene, the Kissinger of France,
wrote an earlier book Way Ahead, in its predictions. In fact,
if you recall, he made the prediction of nomadic devices,
which he said, these devices of the future would allow
us to be cut off, deracinated from our traditional structures
of family, nation, state, and ATOI was absolutely correct. He
said the effect of consumerism would be as it was
mass produced these devices laptops, TVs, and especially these would
allow us to become more mobile and no longer be
attached to the things that formerly rooted us as human beings.
Hence he titled the Nomadic Devices. Now I didn't know
that he hadn't just said that in two thousand and six.
He said it in his nineteen ninety one book millennium. Wow,
so even more have the curve than we expected. And
there's some interesting artwork. I don't know who chose the artwork.
If you publish a book, typically, right, it's not the
author that chooses the artwork. So a lot of times
people like have these conspiracies and these oh why did
you put this on the cover of your book that
I didn't choose the cover of my book. Okay, And
most people who have a publisher, they don't get to
choose the cover of their book. I had nothing to
do with the cover of this book at all. That's
what publishers and editors do. For Atali, though, there is
this bizarre I can't even read this. It's so small.
It looks like the months or the or is it
maybe I guess the months twelve? It's twelve. So he's
got these weird drawings in Lois It looked like etchings
and woodcuts. Right now, remember Atli was the kissinger to
Francois meets Arond. Okay, so we're talking about the power
behind the throne, so to speak, again, the kissinger of France,
and he is identified that as that by Toffler in
the forward. Okay, so that's not conspiracy theorizing. It's actually
right here. He says, this is nineteen ninety one. Atily
is not known in America. America's too provincial. Oh yeah,
we're not. We're not sophisticated in European. In fact, it
was Jacques Attalie who accompanied Foncois Mitehrand in the global
meetings with Gorba Chop And it was because of this
Kissinger of France role that Toffler says, Atli was placed
as the head of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development,
and he says that he is there to help Eastern
Europe undergo the painful transition from a centrally planned Soviet
economy to a market based one. However, he's not well
known in America because Americans are provincial. He says that
uh Ataly is a force of intellect and his interests
and his analyses are broad and wide ranging. In fact,
Toefler says, he wrote a fascinating treatise on the connection
between politics and the economics of music. How does music
relate to political culture? Well, they're gonna you're gonna find
and you're gonna see some interesting comments from Ataly which
I think help us to understand why. In fact, you
will even see a couple esoteric references from Ataly, which
makes sense given what we read and brief pitch in
the Future where he talks about the global brain when
we're all linked in our minds to the web, which
he calls the gollum and he says that, uh, in fact,
Ataly could be the head of a bank which could
become a new pill of the global order. Now this
is right at the beginning of the public announcement of
the EU. Right, Women's the EU publicly announced, wasn't it
like early nineties EU? Now we know from our writings
in our ninety three Okay, so this is two years
before the public announcement of the EU. However, the EU
was already planned by the OSS and the post World
War two powers in the forties and fifties, and in
fact we know that that was the case through the
what's called the European Project. And we went into great
detail in Rawtu's excellent geopolitical absolute masterpiece necessary work, the
Milliner Fabian Conspiracy, and he's got an entire chapter dedicated
to all the goons and goblins behind project and essentially
the Fabian socialists who are the architects of it. And
yet again here we have something that is not new
in the nineteen nineties. But even in this book, they're
essentially saying that he might be the head of the
biggest bank going forward. Of course that didn't actually materialize
because there's two areas of this book's thesis which ended
up being wrong. So notice that the global elites, when
they write this kind of book, they don't always get
everything right. They project things into the future, they have theories, plans, analysis, actuaries,
et cetera. And they're not always one hundred percent correct.
And we're going to notice two key points where I'll
tell that you got things wrong, but we're also going
to see a lot of places where he got things
really correct. Jordan Flores says, can you write a book
on how to win an argument against my wife? No,
because no one can win an argument against your wife.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 3: Steven Bissett, do you have a problem? Why are you
even here? If you don't like what you're seeing here,
you can just leave, dude, get out here.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 3: Interesting again, the woodcuts. I don't know what the woodcuts mean.
It's another bizarre woodcut of almost a kind of alchemical
This is like a an angel man handing a book,
and then an angel above the angel who's blessing the people.
I don't, I don't can't tell what this means. You
can figure out what this means. But so Ottley begins
by saying that, well, we're entering a new era because
the Berlin Wall has fallen. So this book is written
right around that time. It's just fallen. And he says
Toddler's future shock, that's old news. Change the only constant
that's not actually true. In fact, if change is the
only constant, you couldn't say change is the only constant
because the proposition itself would be self refuting and would
no longer be true. So if change is the only constant, yeah,
thank you. By the way, we got eight hundred people
on x that's cool. You guys would hit like and share.
We got four hundred over here on YouTube. That's nice.
Attili says that history is accelerating, the Berlin Walls falling.
Now we're in a new order and nWo so key
elements here that will be admitted is that it's almost like,
as Atili will point out later, he says that the
balance of powers in the world during the Cold War
were two pillars with a pyramid in the middle. Yes,
he says this, I kid you not. He says, the
two pillars are USSR and USSA, and then the pyramid
in the middle. And he says that now that the
Cold War has come to an end, the Berlin Wall
has fallen, the Soviet Union has collapsing. He says that
this pillar over here of the USSR is gone. Now
we have and he says, the pyramid, by the way,
is the US with the dollar at the top. So
the end of the USSR removes the balance of power,
so to speak, to the new liberal, open market order
of pluralism. But before we get to all that fascinating statement,
at the very beginning of the book, I did not expect,
Atali says, you might think that if you want to
understand today's world, you would want to read classics of
economics and geopolitics like Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations or
Karl Marx's Dost Capital. And why yes, wouldn't every sophisticated
nerdman geopolitical nerd man online ran We're read on the
book Kyle marks share and he says those aren't even
as relevant as Blade Runner. Yes, you heard me right,
Jacquette Deliz says Blade Runner is more relevant today than
Dot's Capital or wealth of Nations. That interesting. It's almost
like he's thinking Esoter Hollywood was like, he's thinking in
this kind of way. Yeah, exactly. By the way, shout
out to those super chatters. I love my new my
new sounds here, look at this, here we go. He says,
Blade Runner is going to be more accurate because the
future that we're going into will be technocratic nineteen ninety one, y'all,
this wasn't written in two thousand and twenty four. So again,
a lot of things he's gonna get right, particularly with
tech predictions, and in fact, believe it or not, Jacquette
Deli is actually gonna get it quite a few geopolitical
things and analyzes correct. The question, though, is that in
critiques he's going to get some really accurate critiques. Believe
it or not, I was surprised. That does not mean
his answers are correct. Now, he says that look, if
the US is going to go into the future, if
it's going to be the center of global power in
the future, he says it's going to have to transform,
and one of the things that's going to have to
transform is that money will have to move at the
speed of the future. And he doesn't know if the
dollar and these kinds of things are going to be
able to move at the speed that globalization will require.
That's fascinating because he wasn't even thinking of bitcoin. He
wasn't even thinking of cryptocurrencies. And of course it's Silicon
Valley America, the West that develops bitcoin. And by the way,
bitcoin will actually answer a lot of the things that
atally brings up as problems, So again nineteen ninety one,
he didn't have any knowledge of those. He says that
the future people will be severed from any national alliance
by the microchip gadgets that they have. These nomadic devices
will make some people into rich nomads. They will be
able to participate in a global liberal market culture through
economic choice. They will be able to roam the planet
seeking ways to use their free time. Not everybody will
participate in this, however, there will be many in the
future who become obsolete, their functions are obsolete. There will
be beggars of the future, the poor nomads, boat people
on a planetary scale, applying the planet, searching for sustenance
and shelter. It's almost as if they planned global upheaval
to move the populations and to make them into nomads
in order to have the end of the nation state.
In other words, the open market liberal order post Soviet
Union is the means by which there will be the
transformation away from the nation state. And he says that
you can read Alvin Toffler about this, and he says,
I'm saying basically the same thing. Like past civilizations, they
sought order to ward off the threat of nature and
other warring tribes and men. This coming new order of
the future will be based on the ability to manage violence.
Unlike previous orders. However, they were ruled by religion in
the past, then it transitioned to military force. The new
order of the future will manage all violence largely by
economic control. In other words, microchips, devices, et cetera. And
if we want to with that cbdc UBI, et cetera,
we're gonna need to have the means in this electronic
age of opposing the electronic centralized control. This is the
only one that does that. Bitcoin, it's decentralized. By the way,
are you having a good week. Many of us are
having good weeks. In five days, bitcoin is up five percent. Now, okay,
guys clicking the button, what did Ivan say. There's a
good chance that we popped to eighty or ninety. Okay,
seventy was a big key resistance point. If we can
edge above seventy, there's a good chance of popping to
eighty or ninety. Not guaranteed, but again, we know we're
going to one hundred and fifty eventually. Okay, it might
be this year, it might be next year, who knows.
But look, I just heard today that the pension funds,
the boomer pension funds, are now looking for bitcoin exposure. Anyway,
if you do, by the way, I want to get
started with bitcoin. If you're looking for an outlet to
just custody bitcoin and buy bitcoin, then I recommend swan Bitcoin.
And here is the promo code where you can head
over to swan bitcoin and get started by just buying
and cussing bitcoin. And I remember, I had no idea
what was in this book, but a lot of what
Athlete brings up will actually be totally relevant to what
bitcoin is. And I think countries that align themselves with
this the future of real money. Those are going to
be the ones that are prosperous and powerful.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 3: Actually, he moves on to say that in the close
of the Saddam Hussein situation there in the early nineties
there or he says that the USA is expanding itself
into too many foreign interventions and wars. By the way,
no people always ask me this. There's a different Jay
Dyard that is not me that wrote the Big Coin book.
Even though I'm a big supporter a Big coin, I
don't know who wrote that book. I have no idea.
I assume it's a real person. I don't think it
was somebody just stealing my name. Anyway, I don't know
what you mean. Swan doesn't accept fifty dollars a month purchases.
I think they do, I mean not on the app.
It's like you can put in you can put in
any amount a month you want. I think. Let me
look and see. So let's see recurring by fifty dollars
a week. Let's see if you can add a different amounts,
edit it, and maybe you have to do it every
Maybe you have to do it every every week and
not a month. I don't know. I mean fifty dollars
a month, dude, come on, you gotta be you gotta
I would do more than that. It's like fifty dollars
a month anyway. By the way, so thank you for
the support. If you're on x uh, these links are
I don't have these links on X so you can
get these links over on YouTube. Now let's see where
are we at here we go back to Ottili, Atile says,
because of all the expansion into foreign interventions, like all
previous empires, America will exhaust itself. I think this is
a very plausible critique, and here we are, what thirty
ish years later, and this does seem to be correct.
Nine hundred x. That's awesome. So Attily is correct that
in comparing the US to he says Spain, this is fascinating.
He says, if you look at the history of the
Spanish Empire and its fall. He cites a historian named
Paul Kennedy The Rise and Fall of Great Powers. He
says that once Spain in the sixteen thirty four decided
to get involved in the conflicts of the Thirty Years War,
this essentially exhausted them. Spanish monarchy was sagging under massive debts,
and its inefficient industries. This eventually led to the bank kruptcy,
the declaration of bankruptcy in the sixteen forties by the
Spanish king, and the full decline of the Spanish Empire.
He says that if you compare the US troop movements,
this is in the early nineties, Broler, I remember this
is the nineties, Saudi Arabia, Persian Gulf conflict, Iraq blah
blah blah. This is key. Now here's where Atley is
really correct. Okay, so no, he's going to get some
things very wrong. But this first couple chapters of this
book actually surprised me. I mean he was particularly the
first chapter. This first chapter is like really accurate, and
he's accurate from analyzing the problems he's doing a critique
of consumerism. All this stuff's great. Does not mean his
answers are great. His answers are terrible. But first chapter
is actually really spot on it and basically everything we
would say. Now he says, like Spain, the United States
is not the first great power to become mired and
massive debt, as it remains retains global responsibilities. America has
over extended its debt and this will become a symptom
of fatal imbalance before its eventual demise. The US debt
crisis cannot ultimately be solved by kicking the cannon on
the road, et cetera, and more debt. He says that
it is more evident that the central organizing principle of
the future, whatever happens to be in the margins, will
be economic. This will become apparent as we get closer
to the year two thousand. The rule of military might
be characterized by the Cold War, it's being replaced by
the reign of markets. The liberal ideas, the open market,
the democracy, the liberal market, et cetera. Have defeated the
chief rival of communism. To be sure, however, the conundrum remains,
how will we balance this economic growth with social justice?
So in the nineties nineteen ninety one, he's already predicting
and talking about social justice will be the buzzword of
the future. How do we fix the social justice caused
by economic disparities? And again, this is like a weird
left idea that's totally debonked. I think it should be
even though people still believe this. People think that the
reason that there's crime and the reason that people act
bad is because of social inequalities, like as if we
had equality, there wouldn't be crime. No crime happens because
humans are fallen and they choose vice. That's why over virtue.
So the left, they typically will classic progressives even today,
the left whatever, they mistake the symptoms for the causes.
So the reason that we have crime and all this
crazy stuff is not inequality, it's those are manifestations of
fallen human beings choosing evil. But remember, the left can't
admit that there's such a thing as evil because that
would undo the whole progressive as paradigm. Attali says that
the West America is particularly transitioning away from an industrial
economy to a service economy. That's correct, and in fact,
if we were called the analysis of one of the
other globally texts, alex Obeya's Rank Corporation book, Soldiers of Reason,
that we've did analysis of Abya actually says that the
Rank Corporation was the brains behind that transition. So this
was actually a planned thing. Wasn't accidental to transition America
into a service economy away from an industrial economy. It
was done by design. There's a discussion by him of
the dialectical clash of East and West and the Cold War,
perhaps leading to a fall of both into a new
world order that didn't end up happening. Instead, we got
the victory of Western liberal democratic capitalism, whatever the heck
that is. But he says that the real focus of
the future, won't you give you that stuff. It's going
to be microchips, biotech and GMOs again way ahead of
his time with that one. He says that we're emerging
into a new hyper industrial order. So he just like
Klaus and Davos crew right Fourth Industrial Revolution, he's talking
about the same thing as Klaus. There, inequality will cleave
to this new world o rder, just as the Berlin
Wall once divided east and West, he says, So in
the future, there's still going to be a cleavage of inequality,
but it won't be geographical east and west of the
Berlin Wall. It'll be super elites with money versus the
masses of those that don't have money. How do we
determine who will be the super elite with money? It
will be whoever has controlling interests in whatever the money
of the future is. Is essentially what he says. He
doesn't say that in explicit terms, because again he doesn't
know what bitcoin is. But if you believe in bitcoin,
then that's what he's that's what he's looking for, right,
Like the Pagans in Acts seventeen groping in the dark.
He doesn't know, but he's like, whatever in the future
ends up being the solution to money and money power
will be that. Now. I have this analogy I came
up with that was fitting, I think, and it's I
love that scene in the New Dune right Doom too,
where they're trying to figure out how they're gonna beat
shut on the fourth and the Harconans and and uh
Gurney and and uh Paul are like, well, of course
we do have that giant stash of the Atradees' family warheads,
and the freemen are all like, the what the heck
is that now in the future which is already beginning
to emerge. If you want your version of the inheritance
of the Atradees' family money warheads, how many BTC do
you have? That's what I'm talking about. Do you see
my analogy that's gonna be the thing of the future, right,
Do you understand it's difficult already to become a whole coiner.
How much more difficult will it be to become a
whole coiner when it's five hundred thousand dollars per bitcoin?
What about when it hits one million dollars a bitcoin?
What about when it hits ten million dollars per bitcoin
fifteen twenty years from now? Now? Of course, true, the
dollars devalued, so that doesn't necessarily mean that it has
the same purchasing power per se, but it just depends.
There's no You're not going to stop this. This is
the money of the future, and people still haven't figured
it out yet, And don't listen to the dummies in
the chat have no idea what it is and what
it ain't. Really Loo put you Yeah, can you touch
the app on your phone for your bank?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 3: Do you see the money when you transfer it on zell?
Do you touch it?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 3: So enough of these uh, low low tier boomer arguments.
Now back to Italy. How many tradees, nuclear economic warheads?
Do you have the revolutions? He I didn't even here's
a color revolution I forgot about. He says that we've
just seen the success, apparently of Europe's remarkable Velvet Revolution.
So this was the CIA's color revolution in Czechoslovakia, known
as the Velvet Revolution. It is one I told the
color reolution I totally forgot. This led to the opening
up of the economy there to a market economy. And
then he says that a future of successful color revolutions
might occur. Some of them did, of course in Ukraine
it was the Orange Revolution. By the way, that doesn't
mean we want to go back to some Soviet thing.
It just means that amazingly Atali cases this out like
it's a dialectical conflict between East and West Soviet versus
Western capitalist and to those who are of the higher
order of this kind of international stuff, they seem to
kind of have this spoken slash unspoken secret that it
doesn't really matter which thing emerged under the Cold War,
either of these systems will be the placeholder. It will
be the phase before we go to the full on nWo.
So if the Soviets had ended up winning in that experiment,
then we would have had a Soviet dominated technocracy. That's
why we saw a lot of hd Wells, bertrand Russell
right early on. They were saying, Hey, the Soviet experiment
is running wonderfully. Maybe that's the model of the future
technocratic governance, right, That's why Russell says that it's Plato's Republic,
plato Republic, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Did you even
know the USSR Socialist Republic? There is an even more
ominous and less visible threat on the rise and has
to do with a very warp and woof of the nWo.
It's liberal ideology of consumerism and pluralism. The essence about
democracy and the market is choice. But what happens when
choice is not given and available to all people? He
says that the system might begin to crack when it's
realized that there's not actually choice, And he says that
really the whole system is grounded on a nihilistic indifference
and the cult of immediacy, which is I thought was interesting.
That's true. I agree there is a cult of immediacy,
which is but technology provides this convenience, and it's great
to have that efficiency and the convenience. However, there's a
trade off because when you trade off everything for convenience
and immediacy, oftentimes we're actually trading off a lot of
good things too, So we're trading our privacy nowadays for
a lot of convenience and immediacy. We're trading local business
for the convenience and immediacy of Jeffrey buzz Os and
his drone army that's going to bring the packages right,
rather than driving to the local business to buy these
things so that we can save a dollar and give
the oligarchs of Silicon Valley more and more power control.
And he says, you know, all of this might collapse
into a possible nihilistic revolt. Interesting he doesn't say exactly
who would revolt, but I think he thinks maybe the
the poorer classes. But of course if they revolt, right,
they're not going to revolt against the actual people in control.
They're going to revolt against people that they are duped
into revolting against, like the local business owner who makes
two hundred thousand dollars a year. As if that's the
person who's like, you know, the elite. Okay, now, that's
not the elite. I mean, that's who employs and gives
jobs to people in the local community. Amazingly, he says
the culture of choice must not be allowed to embrace
processes that would transform life itself through tinkering with human
DNA and destroying the genetic heritage of the human rights,
the diverse genetic characters. Well, that's fascinating. So Jacques Attalie
almost sounds like he's warning against transhumanism and genetic manipulation
where and that's quite a change from what he's pushing
in two thousand and six. So he's a lot more
are cautious and dare we say, almost traditional in ways
in this nineteen ninety one book versus his two thousand
and six book, which says that transhumanism is the tip
of the spear of Then wo he cites of all people. Well, no,
let me rephrase this. He says that we can never
allow the biological limitations or borders to be overrun or destroyed.
The great paradox of global consumer democracy is that the
rights to pleasure and happiness might be a toxic elixir
we are forcing our children to drink. Amazing. Wow, that
sounds like us, because this is the point we make
oftentimes to libertarians when we're debating from whence view derived
these idea of rights. Perhaps there are rights, but on
what grounds and in your system, what's the justification for rights?
Especially since many of you are low tier reddit level atheists.
Where in any sense at all do you imagine that
there's a right if we are matter in motion? This
is fiction. Where do we get rights to choice and
pleasure and consumption? Well, these are just assumed. Ottily says,
we're gonna have to have a new definition of the sacred. Well,
I agree, like it seems like modern society has actually
divested itself from the sacred. Attily notices that, but of
course there's no such thing as inventing a new definition
of it. You can't invent new definitions just be made up.
So Atali's a secular sort of materialist approach, pragmatic approach
to these questions is not going to get us anywhere.
I mean, to be honest with you, this first chapter
it sounds like Jordan Peterson. I mean, you got some
interesting insights. I wouldn't say it's as right wing as
quote unquote right wing as Jordan Peterson, but it sounds
like a chapter that Jordan Peterson could write. And then
he says, look, let's go back to history and see
if we can do some archaeology of ideas to find
some historical forms and structures. Now, this chapter again, it
was actually fairly fascinating. It's a great insight into the
mind of the global elite about how they view things.
And in every global leite text, almost all them. Right,
we get the same process, right, we have to do
the same thing where we have to go through the history,
and really what it ends up being is the global
elite storytelling. Right, we need the history lesson from them,
and then they give us the storytelling, which allows them
to then posit that their version of where we're going
in the nWo is the only rational one to go into.
He says, history tells us that man has these sort
of stages and these these sort of phases, and he
says that we're going to look at social forms and
the myths that cultures utilize to create social cohesion. And
he says the first thing that happens is that they
invent and make up hierarchy. I would say that's true
right from a historical perspective, And I don't think all
hierarchy is invented, but there is a sense in which
hierarchy is natural, is what we're saying. Right, And this
again sounds kind of like, yeah, I think you could
say he's probably red Fuco. He probably read a Twain
Bee Fucou, you know, outlines of history, as she wells.
I'm sure he's read all these people to kind of
put together this journey. Probably a Goose. Compte has the
same idea, like progressing civilizations and ages of man. It's
kind of arbitrary, but he says, so basically, mankind develops
hierarchies in order to have a functioning society. They make
up categories and value and distinction. So this kind of
sounds almost like Nietzsche, right. They also come up with
a annointed king or prince who has the monopoly of violence. Here,
he sounds like a libertarian. They place this right of
justice and violence in this single ruler, and then we
get the investiture of violence. Then violence gets managed by
also the priest class. So the priest class rises is
very Nietzschean. The priest class also kind of competes with
or synthesizes with, synergize is with the prince. He calls
this prince a priest and prince a prince and priest here,
and we're not talking about prince like purple rain, purple reign,
purple rain, purple rain. R E I. G. N oh,
get it, Prince and priest, get it purple rain. I'll
make it rain underneath my reign. Elect me and you'll
be rich. I'll make it rain underneath my purple rain.
By the way, you would like you share it. WelCom everybody, then,
he says. The priest class was also perceptive in that
an orderly society. He seems to say, they made it
up needed the idea of sacrifice. We need sacrifice and scapegoats.
Scapegoats might be the center, the enemy, tribes, the you
know Whoever, the problem of the society is escapegoat, he says, Really,
this is all mythology that the priests repeat to control society.
The notion of the sacred, then, is intimately tied into
this power structure that brings order to violence to control society.
Ever since the first sedentary social forms, perhaps say ten
thousand years ago, there have been free ways to control
man's violence. The religious control, the military control, and the
economic control. The first, the religious mediates man's relationship with
nature and the fact of his death, the second the
relationship between the social forms that is the military, and
the third the economic. With each of the social forms,
these three ways control violence and thus define the order
corresponding to various types of social forms or social structures.
These orders, which can in turn be called the orders
of sacred, force and money. Sacred force and money the
three key elements here. Multiple forms of order and sacred
continue up into the present day as well. However, the
modern forms have seen religious power displaced by the political
and the economic. So political economy has replaced the religious power.
Thus today we essentially have no sacred The sacred has
no power, but without the sacred, there is no power,
and so other entities are actually invested with sacred power.
He says, if you go back to ancient worldviews, these
were all integrated. For example, all of life was divine,
part of the divine mythos, a manifestation of the divine.
For example, animism, you saw every object has a spirit
that in dwells it. The eating of flesh and animals,
and perhaps even cannibalism was part of this perpetual cycle
of nature. This is a very again, very Fucao, very
Nietzsche type of analysis. Everything was seen and subsumed under
the order of the sacred in a unified, holistic worldview. Thus,
nothing whether it's birth, death, art, or life is not
a part of this worldview. Today, we've moved away from
that worldview where animism he's just calling animism any kind
of religious worldview that sees everything as in some sense
related to her own by the divine or sacred. Now
the sacred has been replaced with products. I'd say that's true.
So now we've moved away from animism to where sacred
objects are now consumable products. And he says this is
a natural outworking of the rule of money. Once we
transition to the money power in modernity, post capitalism, he saying,
then we no longer see these things as sacred because
they're not in any sense related to a transcendent. They
only have the human horizontal plane relative value insofar as
they're useful to humans. Thus, no transcendent here doesn't mean
that there can't be. It's just saying that this is
the attitude, the modus operandi of the system. That's all
you say. He says, Thus capitalism is rise to efficiency,
immediacy and streamlining or the Burnham type stuff managerial elite,
et cetera, tailorism. And he says we can look back
in fact to market forms. Capitalism is the ninth form.
I don't know where he came up, but he just
sort of came up with these forms. He says, there's
not and we're in the ninth and he's going to
list these in a minute. At the center of each
of these forms or phases is a dominant city state,
and these city states are ruled by elites that define
the ideology of the city state. In fact, religious revolutions
are oftentimes a determining factor in the power structure of
these elite city states. Now, notice this is one of
the global elite telling you that the global elite rule
from city states. Is he a conspiracy theorist, No, he's
one of the global elite. He's the kissinger of friends
telling you what I say. Each market form uses technology
that is more efficient than the predecessors in utilizing energy
and organizing communication. A form is stable in so long
as it creates enough wealth to maintain the demand for
its products. When it begins to falter or is hampered,
this market form weakens and gives way to the next.
Thus there's an intimate connection between money, power and tech.
Then he says, the newest form that comes when a
new form organizes will be a new center. When technology
here is and social relations allow for competing businesses on
the market to replace non market services by a new
mass product object. The market will then obey and new
added value. Mark Carney, one dollar. I work in cybersecurity.
I know bitcoin is auditible and traceable. Yeah, I'm aware
of the public ledger. And he says it is not
a good currency. It is a good store of wealth.
I understand that. But you can have something else that's
a layer two, or you can have something else that's
a stable coin, or the dollar can continue to exist
but be backed by something like bitcoin, so it doesn't
have to be the day to day thing itself. It
can just be the backing for whatever. The day to
day thing is a digital dollar or something like that.
So I'm aware of that. But also the fact that
it's decentralized and that it's a public ledger. It means
that it is audible and traceable in the sense of
like bad actors. But also a lot of these entities
that would do this right, they might not be here
in ten or fifteen years or twenty years. The eight forms.
I'm sorry I missed, Philip, Philip Edenhorn, this is the
top ten global elite streams thank you this one, or
you mean that you want a top ten global league.
Mg sends three dollars and says, I just want to
hear that sweet song. Yeah, exactly, let's here it ready.
Next up is the eight forms after the song. From
the thirteenth century to now, eight successive forms have emerged. Again.
I have no idea where he gets I guess he's
just picking the eight most powerful city states from thirteen hundred.
Why he picks thirteen hundred, I don't know. Bruges thirteen hundred,
Venice fourteen fifty and to A fifteen hundred, Genoa fifteen fifty,
Amsterdam sixteen fifty, London seventeen fifty, Boston basting retired eighteen eighty,
and Nu Yak thirteen thirty I'm sorry nineteen thirty. So
basically saying that we're kind of at the end of
the New York dominant New York Wall Street dollar dominance era.
As technology progresses and is invented, production improves in society
is able to then cut the costs of goods and services,
and whoever is better at that becomes the new center
of power of the city states. Notice that he doesn't
say it's nation states, it's these powerful city centers New York, London, etc.
He says, each time there's a new form, it reduces
the power of the family in the previous form. Interesting.
A world of comedy, a world economy always has an
urban center of gravity, a city that is the logistics
and heart of this activity. Dominant cities do not dominate forever.
They're eventually replaced by another. And what determines that? Apparently
it is tech. The essential question must be answered, well,
who decides what region or city becomes the center? A
city becomes the center when it's constellation of industrial and
political elites organize themselves around a cultural project and harness
the resources to develop new technologies for faster and better means.
This is going to be a key element, I believe
in determining who will have power in the future. The
new petro dollar is a CBDC. None of that's going
to work. I mean a CBDC that they put out
is just going to be another It's going to be
an electronic fiat. How is that going to be any better?
An electronic fiat will probably be worse than a physical fiat.
This is not fiat it's opposite of that. Now listen
to this. What is the form that rules where we
are now? Well, where we are now in this New
York post New York nineteen thirties era, get this, material
abundance and geographical advantage rarely amount to what makes for
the key city center. So what is it then, that
allows for certain cities to arise? It's not the answer
I expected. You might think, well, physical location or material abundance,
and he saying, no, it's not actually that. This is
his thesis. What allows a certain region or city to
arise to become one of these key centers is rather
that it avoids becoming entangled in wars. Foreign entanglements bleed
the rivals and allows the city that doesn't get involved
to become the center. Isn't it interesting that what allowed
America to become what it was the world power non interventionism,
not becoming entangled in all these wars which drains and
destroys the country. To prop up this ridiculous form of
a form of imperialism is the only way to put it.
And by the way, it is that Brazinski calls it the
American Empire, that, by the way, was all designed by
the CFR. The CFRs who decided to turn America away
from a protectionist, non interventionist power into a global police,
international interventionist powerfr achieved that in the nineteen twenties, that transition,
that was their key function under Rockefeller another oligarchs, and
that's why we're in this situation that we're in. The
Second World War was the midwife of the New York
dominant Wall Street market form. The desire of families and homemaking,
desire of families for homemaking durables was met by this
Keynesian New deal social spending policy of the post war period.
And what is kanesianism Fabian socialist economics. Milton Keynes was
a Fabian. All of the institutions post World War Two
that were set up, you might think, were they communists,
were they capitalists? No, dummies, They're both. It's called Fabian
social which is the merger of monopoly capital and communism,
known as reform Marxism or Fabian socialism. And literally all
of the post World War two institutions that exist now today,
the IMF, the World Bank, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera, they are
Keynesian institutions. That's the world that we live under. In fact,
there's a whole list of these institutions in the book,
and that's because all of these British elites that set
this up were all part of this same structure. The
Royal Instagram National Affairs was created under the leadership of
Lionel Curtis and was structured by Fabians like R. H. Tawney,
John MAYNERD. Kaines, Philip Noel Barker, as well as Fabian
collaborators and synthesizers like the London School of Economics professor
Arnold Toynbee, who became the director of Chatham House. Thus,
all of these institutions that were set up, League of Nations,
United Nations, Area CFR, Socialist League, World Bank, International Monetary Fund,
Aspen Institute, World Council, Churches, NATO, Builderberg, they're literally all
set up by Fabian socialists. It's not even that hard
to figure this out. It's not even like controversial, and
that book is way better and more modern and updated.
This is just the older version of this history. And
people are all confused about this because they think that
it's like classical Marxism. It's not classical Marxism. Okay, it's
not anti capital, it's Marxism that's pro capital and allied
with it, and atally admits that Ghess, that is the
structure of the existing order. Now he says that the competition,
and I guess that's why he has this weird woodcut.
I mean, it looks like a durera. I don't know
what it is. But this is like two guys competing,
So I guess this is about competition. Now, this next
chapter is where he gets things wrong. There's a couple
of insights in the chapter though, because he says, for example,
the very beginning that our system is based on pluralism,
that is the system of a liberal markets, democratic open
liberal markets. It requires pluralism. He says, we could describe
this as a pyramid with two pillars. I kid you not.
This is his Masonic terminology. He says, the world structure
is like a pyramid with two pillars. Oh, I'm sorry, Jaka,
are you an idiot conspiracy theorist? Because anyone else where
to say this they would be immediately deemed as an
idiot conspiracy is Yet when you say it using your
obvious Masonic imagery. And by the way, Grand Orient Freemasonry
has always been very powerful in France and most of
its leaders and presidents are members of the Grand Orient Lodge,
et cetera. He says, the world order in the Cold
War can be described as a pyramid with two pillars.
The pyramid is the shape that is taken by the
eighth market form, which is the dollar. It is the
petro dollar, the universal international currency that presently rules, and
the two pillars are the main maintenance of the dialectics
of global order of the US and the USSR. However,
this one pillar of the USSR has just collapsed. This
will now give America the opportunity to become the center again.
He says. There's two competitors to America that might displace
America as the center. He says, those competitives, and this
is where he's wrong. These competitors for the next few
decades will be Japan and the EU. Okay, Well, that
didn't happen. In fact, four years after this book, Japan's
economy collapsed into what's called the Lost Decades. Over the
period of nineteen ninety five to twenty twenty three, Japan's
GDP fell from five trillion to four trillion real wages
fell eleven percent the lost decades. So perhaps americanists understood
that the threat of Japan and I remember in the
nineties there were these books that were coming out, There
were books coming out about the rise of Japan, the
threat of Japanese, you know, economy to the West and whatever.
But whatever happened, however this occurred, I don't know all
the details of this. Enough happened such that Japan was
definitely emasculated and cuc k ed into being essentially unable
to have population below replacement population levels. And I guess
essentially the toxic culture that was exporter was enough to
do this. I don't know, I don't know exactly. I'm
not I don't know enough about Japanese geopolitics to say.
But he says that the other competitor would be the EU.
That didn't work, That EU has not become a competitor
to America, So exactly where that's going to go, I
don't know. However, he says that the dream of the
EU in nineteen ninety one would perhaps be that it
could step forward to become a competitor. Unfortunately, it turns out,
as even Atali says, Japan just like Japan. Europe's replacement
population levels are not enough to even give it that
status anymore. And he's writing prior to all of the
non Europeans suddenly entering Europe in the past twenty years.
So Atli got all of that very wrong. However, he
was perceptive enough to realize that population displacement is more
than sufficient to erode the nation state, combined with the
power of the nomadic device, which severs from one's par family, tradition, etc.
So that's the first half of the very insightful geopolitical
text from Jack at the book Millennium. It's a very
quick read. It's only one hundred pages, and so in
the next couple of days I will have the part
two up. On a reminder to you guys that I
did get Part two of the Sexpionage History book up.
The book is complete. You can watch the part two
over here on rockfin or you can subscribe at Jayson
Analysis to get access to the archives of the last
ten years of deep geopolitical analysis, theology, book reports, book reviews, analyses,
et cetera, debates, lectures, the rest of the Global Elite
book series. You can get all that in the archives
at Jays Analysis for four nine five a month sixty
dollars a year. You subscribe in the show description at
the links, or you can subscribe to the same material
over here on rock Fin. Rock Finn is a great
free speech based platform. Either way has its advantages. Not
everything is over on Rockfin makes it very easy. However,
not everything in the last ten years of my work
is over on Rockfin. A lot of it is, but
still not everything. It takes a long time to get
it all over there, so I'd say about seventy percent
of it is over there. We got a nice sizable
audience over there on x Thank you guys for watching
live over there. That's the first time we've multi streamed.
I can't believe it all worked. We multi streamed over
on Twitch too. I have an old Twitch channel that
I resurrected. Guys who would like and share, remember to
get tickets to our event. Also, I have a show sponsor,
and that is chalk dot Com. If you head on
over to chalk dot com, you can use a promo
co j forty four life to get access to the
best and supplementation that's out there. They have a hyper
super stringent process for making sure that the products are pure.
They derived a lot of these from the Amazon. It's
a very serious red pill base company. Chalk dot Com
is the best when it comes to all of these products.
You can get the male Vitality Stack that pops up
right away if you see this right here at the
performance stack. You get the Chad mode and yes it
actually has the Chad meme dude right there. You do
not pay that full amount. You pay a discounted amount
much better than fifteen percent off. You pay the discount.
I don't want this website.
Speaker 1: Sector.
Speaker 3: Here we go. You pay forty four off of that
one seventy four if you want to get the performance that.
But you can also buy individual products. You just sign
up for J forty four Life. That's Jay four four
la Fe and you will get that coming every month.
And I guarantee you you're gonna want Chalk coming on
a monthly basis. It's not just for dudes though, there's
also products for ladies. Ladies if you want, you know, oshwaganda,
that's great for regulating your moods if you have these
kind of female mood swings. I don't know if you
know that, but ladies do have female mood swings, especially
if they are dealing with the astrogns. There's also the
Irish Moss which is good for that. There's also the
Seven Wonders which is great for mineral deficiencies. So get
all those products over at chalk dot com, c HQ
dot com. Also, and there's the Ladies Stack. You don't
have to get. It's not just men's stuff. There's also
female Vitality right here, Female Vitality Stack, and make use
of those promo codes to get that great discount, and
you can you can cancel at any time, so although
you are subscribing, if you ever need to cancel, it's
very easy to do that. You can cancel at any
time over at chalk dot com. Remember to get tickets
to our live event over at event bright, otherwise I
will see