Speaker 1: And he goes deep into the research on the likes
Speaker 1: of Epstein, esoteric Hollywood coults, conspiracies, you name it before
Speaker 1: we get into it, though, Guys, wherever you are watching
Speaker 1: this in the world, we've already got files it on YouTube.
Speaker 1: What your questions in the chair? As Jay expands on
Speaker 1: the subjects here, I'm storing all of the questions. I
Speaker 1: will get them to him at some point, So jaus.
Speaker 1: The first question is you know, I'm going to ask
Speaker 1: you this for viewers who are not familiar with your
Speaker 1: brilliant work. What qualifies you to speak on these subjects?
Speaker 2: Well, I guess my qualifications.
Speaker 3: First of all, are somewhat academic. I did study the
Speaker 3: relationship of psychological warfare to fiction and propaganda at the
Speaker 3: university level. It's a lot of my grad work focused
Speaker 3: on that. Aside from that, I'm an avid reader. I
Speaker 3: grew up with a mom who was an editor and
Speaker 3: a librarian, so it was always surrounded by thousands of books.
Speaker 3: So it's very natural to me to read through a
Speaker 3: lot of these really boring texts from the elite. A
Speaker 3: lot of times they actually admit what they're up to
Speaker 3: and how they do it in their books. So that's
Speaker 3: what I try to do is digest those books, kind
Speaker 3: of put it into ways that everybody can understand it.
Speaker 2: So we go through a lot of heavy information, a
Speaker 2: lot of deep texts, a lot of these.
Speaker 3: Big scandals that you're talking about today, Franklin, cover Up, Epstein, Maxwell.
Speaker 2: And now Diddy.
Speaker 3: But I think another thing that qualifies me to speak
Speaker 3: about it is that my book came out of Esotera
Speaker 3: Callwood one in about twenty sixteen, I think somewhere in
Speaker 3: there the first one, and you know, I was actually
Speaker 3: writing about the types of things that have come out. Now.
Speaker 2: I'm not saying that I'm a prophet.
Speaker 3: I'm just saying that I think Hollywood was kind of
Speaker 3: telling us that this is what they're up to, and
Speaker 3: the same goes through the music industry. So I think
Speaker 3: my two books on this have actually pretty well vindicated.
Speaker 1: All Right, Viewers in the description box on YouTube, all
Speaker 1: of Jay's links that down the his ex his YouTube,
Speaker 1: please support his work before we get deeper into it
Speaker 1: than Jay, what were your preliminary instinctual thoughts when this
Speaker 1: did he indictment first came down.
Speaker 3: Well, there have been rumors for a long time, as
Speaker 3: you know, people like Professor Griff even I don't know
Speaker 3: that he mentioned did he explicitly, but many many years
Speaker 3: ago in the early two thousands, you know, Professor Griff
Speaker 3: from Public Enemy was saying that there is this movement
Speaker 3: within the realm of the world of hip hop to
Speaker 3: compromise people and even said that they use rituals. And
Speaker 3: I think later on we had certain rappers coming out
Speaker 3: saying that this was going on, but they never really
Speaker 3: wanted to name exactly who was involved. It was always
Speaker 3: just kind of whispers. And then we had Kat Williams.
Speaker 2: Right allegedly on stuff with Booty House.
Speaker 3: Okay, I mean we had Kat Williams come out and
Speaker 3: basically just say everything about a year ago on that
Speaker 3: giant podcast with Shape Chaton whatever whatever, Sha Shape, whatever
Speaker 3: his name is. So we kind of knew that this
Speaker 3: was going on. And there've been, remember, many other cases
Speaker 3: in other domains that maybe overlap with Diddy, So I
Speaker 3: felt like, that's got to be what's going on. It's
Speaker 3: most likely what's happening. We did a bunch of podcasts
Speaker 3: about seven months ago when it first really hit the news,
Speaker 3: and uh, then when this, you know, when he was
Speaker 3: arrested you know, a week or so ago, I think
Speaker 3: it was all.
Speaker 2: It was all what we expected.
Speaker 1: All right. So there's been this reoccurring theme of the
Speaker 1: white visual code. And let me just read you this comment.
Speaker 1: You know how Hollywood uses everyone dressed as white as
Speaker 1: a visual code for colts. That's from the three h
Speaker 1: O Come to Leana yoga cult that started in la
Speaker 1: by Yogi Bajan. Any any thoughts on the symbolism of
Speaker 1: the white.
Speaker 2: Clothes, Yeah, it's interesting.
Speaker 3: One thing that I've come across that I haven't seen
Speaker 3: many other people talk about is the connection between Ditty
Speaker 3: and voodoo possibly, and that's because people forgotten that he
Speaker 3: was with j Lo for a year back in the
Speaker 3: two thousands. They were married for about a year, and
Speaker 3: one of Jalo's exes came out and said, many years ago,
Speaker 3: it was in the Huffington Post, that she's really into
Speaker 3: voodoo and Santa Ria. And then if you notice Diddy's
Speaker 3: tattoo on his back, people think that's Mary and Jesus,
Speaker 3: it's not. It's actually a voodoo deity called Azuli Danto
Speaker 3: and she's the patron of shall we say skittles men
Speaker 3: if you catch my trip. So it's not Mary and Joseph.
Speaker 3: It's the Loa from Voodoo, and she's the patron of
Speaker 3: men who like men in Voodoo, and so I think
Speaker 3: that that's what's going on. And in Voodoo, white is
Speaker 3: very important for uh. It's a symbol of purity becoming purified.
Speaker 3: And I suspect that's what's going on.
Speaker 1: All right. We've got loads of questions on the community
Speaker 1: wall as well. So a question that came in today
Speaker 1: for you from Leo Allen. Is the Ditty story a
Speaker 1: distraction for something bigger that he's going on.
Speaker 2: No, I don't think so.
Speaker 3: I think Diddy is probably somebody was brought into this
Speaker 3: and was taught the ways of doing this by people
Speaker 3: above him, people like Clive Davis and others, probably, I'm guessing,
Speaker 3: and then he learned how to use these, you know,
Speaker 3: blackmail rings and do this stuff, which again, all these
Speaker 3: other scandals that we've talked about and heard about for
Speaker 3: so long, Franklin cover up Epstein.
Speaker 2: You notice it's the same.
Speaker 3: Model where there's cameras behind you know, windows, cameras behind mirrors,
Speaker 3: et cetera, and that's to you know, catch.
Speaker 2: People in the act.
Speaker 3: I think he was he's basically making the fall for
Speaker 3: something much bigger. Epstein, same thing he took the fall.
Speaker 3: It implicates people a lot bigger than him. So no,
Speaker 3: I don't think it's a distraction. I think it's a
Speaker 3: real You know, at a certain point, when you abuse
Speaker 3: people for decades, people are gonna start talking about it.
Speaker 1: I don't know if you've watched the video with Jonathan
Speaker 1: Ode who shuts up a Trump hotel, you have watched it, Okay,
Speaker 1: you know he's talking about links to secret societies, black
Speaker 1: secret societies, and the cops are looking at him like
Speaker 1: he was crazy back then. Well now it's all coming out.
Speaker 1: What's your interpretation of the Jonathan Ode interview.
Speaker 3: Well, I think he didn't help his case because he
Speaker 3: was kind of an erratic, sort of crazy acting individual obviously,
Speaker 3: but certainly those kinds of people can still say true
Speaker 3: things and they might know what's going on.
Speaker 2: So I don't know.
Speaker 3: About all the details of every aspect of a story.
Speaker 3: But it's interesting that seven months ago I did not
Speaker 3: remember that event where he had shot up the Trump
Speaker 3: the Trump location. But seven months ago I was on
Speaker 3: Sam Hydes podcast, and about half of the podcast we
Speaker 3: were just devoting it to Diddy, the connection to the
Speaker 3: Boulet Society, Black black secret societies, how they do have
Speaker 3: their own organized crime outfit. You know, Diddy was raised
Speaker 3: ultimately in the circle, originally in the circles of Frank Lucas.
Speaker 3: His mom got him out of those circles, try to
Speaker 3: get him away from that, but then he ends up
Speaker 3: back eventually kind of in these circles of black gangsters
Speaker 3: and the tie the overlap with the music industry. So,
Speaker 3: I mean, I think that that what that guy was
Speaker 3: saying is probably has elements of truth in it.
Speaker 1: Glenn's asking about connections to build a bug.
Speaker 2: Off the top of my head, I'm not sure.
Speaker 3: I mean, I'm sure because of all these high level
Speaker 3: people overlap, I'm sure there's somebody that relates to Builderberg.
Speaker 3: I mean, you know, Oprah, for example, was closely associated
Speaker 3: with was promoting John of God, and John of God
Speaker 3: was doing a baby farming operation where he was essentially
Speaker 3: selling children through these women that were just basically producing
Speaker 3: offspring that he could then sell online to Europe in
Speaker 3: places like that for tens of.
Speaker 2: Thousands of dollars.
Speaker 3: And you know, when Oprah was pushing that guy and
Speaker 3: that came out that all got squashed really quick at
Speaker 3: Oprah's connections. So Oprah, although I don't know that she's
Speaker 3: exactly in Builderberg, she is part of another little group
Speaker 3: called the Good Club, which includes Bill Gates, George Soros,
Speaker 3: Warren Buffett. This was reported on by The Guardian some
Speaker 3: years ago, and their whole modus operandi is depopulation. So
Speaker 3: I would say that, maybe not directly, but indirectly that
Speaker 3: it would relate to Bilderberg people.
Speaker 1: Sure he's saying that Oprah's non altruistic humanitarian Jaye.
Speaker 3: I mean, I think for people that usually reached, I'd
Speaker 3: say it's very rare for billionaires to be altruistic. Maybe
Speaker 3: there's been a few, Maybe there's been a few, but
Speaker 3: most of the time you're probably compromised in some way.
Speaker 1: All Right, We've got a question here from the YouTube
Speaker 1: community wall from Debbie. Does J think that these media
Speaker 1: announcements made by individuals claiming to have tapes and threatening
Speaker 1: to sell or release them are a way of communicating
Speaker 1: through the other players involved, rather than being actual possible leaks.
Speaker 2: It's possible.
Speaker 3: Again, anything is possible, because when these kind of stories break,
Speaker 3: you can have people from within the establishment working over
Speaker 3: time that are pr people. They'll come out and try
Speaker 3: to put out fake stories and fake information, and they
Speaker 3: do that on purpose.
Speaker 2: To dilute into diffuse people.
Speaker 3: Figuring out what's really going on. So the establishment will
Speaker 3: kind of flood it with this info. And so you
Speaker 3: could have this info, have people that just want to
Speaker 3: try to make money, you know, they claim to have
Speaker 3: this or that they want to get attention. You know
Speaker 3: that woman that was saying that it's a lot of
Speaker 3: satanic rituals, I wouldn't be surprised, but she could also
Speaker 3: be doing this to just get attention. Who knows, So
Speaker 3: anything's possible.
Speaker 1: Young about Jackuar Wright's allegations.
Speaker 3: Yeah, the black woman that was pretty much was she
Speaker 3: on Piers Morgan or something pretty which which she was on?
Speaker 1: Yeah, she was interested, all right. So question from common
Speaker 1: why isn't Drake being pulled in yet He's being exposed
Speaker 1: to someone that actually does the things he sings about
Speaker 1: horrible things? Is he untouchable like Epstein clients?
Speaker 2: Good question.
Speaker 3: I mean I haven't put a lot of time into
Speaker 3: researching Drake and his connections. I know a lot of
Speaker 3: people were making a big stink when he was texting
Speaker 3: Millie Bobby Brown some years back. That was a little suspicious.
Speaker 3: She was under age. That seemed to be an odd connection,
Speaker 3: So I wouldn't be surprised there wasn't some kind of
Speaker 3: proclivity there. Remember R Kelly, he also set up a
Speaker 3: sex cult and was trying to run an operation very
Speaker 3: similar to this. So it seems to be a pattern.
Speaker 3: Why But yeah, maybe Drake is a level above Diddy.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 1: One of the most reoccurring questions right now, Jay is
Speaker 1: if it will be linked to Black Rock in any
Speaker 1: way the Diddy case.
Speaker 3: Uh, yeah, I don't know. That's that's a good question.
Speaker 3: I haven't looked at that angle. But again, you know,
Speaker 3: one thing you find is that at a very high level,
Speaker 3: a lot of this stuff is usually overlapping because of
Speaker 3: the people are in multiple different networks and circles. So
Speaker 3: I would say if you look at, for example, the
Speaker 3: Roman Catholic abuse pedo stuff for the last several years
Speaker 3: less several decades, you'll find a lot of parallels with
Speaker 3: those operations as well. It's they always use. It's kind
Speaker 3: of a technology of compromise. It's the same pattern and
Speaker 3: maybe like structure of how.
Speaker 2: They do this. So I wouldn't be surprised if there's
Speaker 2: not connections to people that level. I'm sure there is.
Speaker 1: You know, in your intro you mentioned about Epstein and
Speaker 1: you mentioned about the Franklin scandal. What parallels do you
Speaker 1: see with those cases? With the Diddy case.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean again, there's several. There's King Kora, there's
Speaker 2: elm Guesthouse, there's Franklin.
Speaker 3: I did a podcast maybe two weeks ago we could
Speaker 3: go where I was covering all of these that I
Speaker 3: could think of and find that had similar patterns. And
Speaker 3: so I think I came up with about sixteen of
Speaker 3: these cases where you had this element of a network
Speaker 3: that is kind of in on. It doesn't have to
Speaker 3: be a whole lot of people, it can be a
Speaker 3: handful of people. And this essentially they are utilizing espionage
Speaker 3: techniques to lure and.
Speaker 2: Entrap people in a way in situations that either they're
Speaker 2: willing or not willing.
Speaker 3: Out of a situation where people are drugged, Uh, they
Speaker 3: wake up next to a prostitute, they wake up next
Speaker 3: to somebody under age. Hey we got you on tape.
Speaker 3: You messed up last night. You shouldn't have done that.
Speaker 2: But look, we're gonna we're gonna help you out, We're
Speaker 2: gonna gonna be your friend.
Speaker 3: That seems to be really obvious and what's going on
Speaker 3: in the Epstein situation if you read in depth into that,
Speaker 3: he obviously had a lot of capabilities that really only
Speaker 3: intelligence agencies would have access to and abilities to utilize.
Speaker 3: And so we know, for example, Epstein had different citizenships,
Speaker 3: so he could be in Israel, he could be in
Speaker 3: Saudi Arabia, he could be in a lot of different
Speaker 3: places because he was facilitated with with those luxuries, so
Speaker 3: to speak. And I think that again only only suggests
Speaker 3: a higher level intelligence involvement. And I think there's a
Speaker 3: similar pattern here with Diddy, where there's been a long
Speaker 3: time suspicion, for example, that he's in some way was
Speaker 3: compromised or working with the FBI. He had even had Kanye,
Speaker 3: you know, tweeting at him or replying in text messages.
Speaker 3: You fed if you right, like years ago, Kanye was
Speaker 3: saying that Diddy was essentially fed, and that could go
Speaker 3: back to when he was investigated by the FBI or
Speaker 3: in the early two thousands, what exactly the scandal was
Speaker 3: back then. But he might have been turned at that point, right,
Speaker 3: And so how's he getting away with this for so long? Well,
Speaker 3: he's part of an operation probably. So that's a parallel
Speaker 3: that we see is that the people that run the
Speaker 3: operations usually have higher level connections intelligence connections, private intelligence connections,
Speaker 3: military intelligence.
Speaker 2: Who knows.
Speaker 3: Another element we see is again pretty sophisticated technology gadgetry
Speaker 3: and ways of filming people essentially, and this is what
Speaker 3: led I think you know, if you read say Whitney
Speaker 3: Webb's book, this is what kind of led the just
Speaker 3: layin side of things to come up with. I think
Speaker 3: they invented Netscape Navigator, if that's right. The JUSE's sister
Speaker 3: invented or started the company that would invent Netscape Navigator.
Speaker 3: And originally this was like part of the spy world,
Speaker 3: so they wanted a way to like gather and corelate information,
Speaker 3: probably originally for people that they profiled, but this turns
Speaker 3: into a search engine essention. They ended up selling it,
Speaker 3: I think to Bill Gates's to Microsoft. So you can
Speaker 3: see a lot of patterns with the way to classify
Speaker 3: and structure the information that compromises people. That's another parallel
Speaker 3: that we see, and ultimately it's just it's just a
Speaker 3: way to control people.
Speaker 1: So question from l R, M, MTV and v H one,
Speaker 1: are they involved?
Speaker 2: Uh?
Speaker 3: I would say with Diddy, there's no telling how many
Speaker 3: people are involved because it's it's just now been coming out.
Speaker 3: In fact, I was seeing old clips today of Obama,
Speaker 3: you know, there talking about how awesome Diddy's parties are,
Speaker 3: how great he is. So I would say that there's
Speaker 3: no talent, right. Remember Franklin scandal went all the way
Speaker 3: up to the Bush Senior White House where you had
Speaker 3: call boys brought in for the for the GOP. No
Speaker 3: different amongst the Democrats. It would appear that Obama's been
Speaker 3: to Diddy parties. Michelle apparently was also having a lot
Speaker 3: of fun at the Diddy parties. So I would say, yeah,
Speaker 3: I'm sure a lot of executives at different television networks,
Speaker 3: VH one, I'm sure everybody was involved alleged so.
Speaker 1: Jay. In the Franklin case, the only people who went
Speaker 1: to prison were the survivors, the witnesses. The investigat goes
Speaker 1: down in a plane crash. I think with his son tragically,
Speaker 1: I'm watching Buzzby Call Out Everyone on the Sun from
Speaker 1: Call for executives. It's a big farmb Do you think
Speaker 1: because I just watched an interview with him today with
Speaker 1: Chris Hansen whereby he's saying his wife's telling him he
Speaker 1: needs to get twenty four hour security. Now things are
Speaker 1: getting heavy. Do you think Buzzby is at risk of
Speaker 1: being in a plane crash or catching fast acting pneumonia
Speaker 1: or any one of these ways that they seem to
Speaker 1: put people out of action with.
Speaker 3: I mean, I think anybody who's got dirt or claims
Speaker 3: to have dirt or is whistleblowing. Absolutely, as you know,
Speaker 3: I think you and I did many many interviews about Epstein.
Speaker 3: I think obviously we don't think Epstein killed himself, and
Speaker 3: so that would again suggest and I did a chat
Speaker 3: with Sammy the Bull as well, and he said, you know,
Speaker 3: I've been in that Supermax. Is no way that he
Speaker 3: could have pulled this off without you know, people wanting
Speaker 3: him to be dead.
Speaker 2: So absolutely, I.
Speaker 3: Think there is a real danger. This kind of gives
Speaker 3: credence to you know, remember Star Whackers when Randy Quaid
Speaker 3: was talking about that many many years ago. Do you
Speaker 3: know what I'm talking about?
Speaker 1: I never saw it?
Speaker 3: Well, no, it's it's he said. He was saying a
Speaker 3: long time ago, the actor Randy Quaid, he was or
Speaker 3: scum me Dennis Quaid. Dennis Quaid left Hollywood and he said,
Speaker 3: you know, the star whacker stuff is real. And what
Speaker 3: he meant was there are hitmen that if you come
Speaker 3: out against this stuff, especially in Hollywood.
Speaker 2: Yeah, there's a network. There's a crew of hitmen that
Speaker 2: will come after you. So I would say, wow, k L.
Speaker 1: Coca, does Jay think Beyonce is a Satanic high priestess?
Speaker 1: I get the feeling she's extremely evil. So we had
Speaker 1: a psyekicking remote viewer on Friday night and she was
Speaker 1: rating people on the Demonic scale, and I think she
Speaker 1: gave Beyonce like an eight, r a nine. They were
Speaker 1: really high. She was tied with Oprah Sean.
Speaker 2: How did you rank on the demon scale? Like where
Speaker 2: were you?
Speaker 3: Were you like a three or what? I'm curious what
Speaker 3: the demon scale is about? Where am I that? Do
Speaker 3: I want to be at the top or do I
Speaker 3: want to be low?
Speaker 2: Which one?
Speaker 1: You want to be low? You want to be low?
Speaker 3: That doesn't make me number one demon anyway, So yeah,
Speaker 3: I would say. My wife wrote in her book a
Speaker 3: couple chapters actually on Beyonce, and I think there's a
Speaker 3: long history of Beyonce probably being involved in witchcraft and Crollianism,
Speaker 3: and so I would say she's probably a witch. I
Speaker 3: don't know how serious she takes Satanism per se, but
Speaker 3: a lot of those groups kind of overlap as well.
Speaker 3: So if you're into Krollianism, I mean that kind of
Speaker 3: overlaps with WICCA because the founder of modern WICCA, Gerald Gardner,
Speaker 3: comes out of Crollianism, So there's a lot of overlap there.
Speaker 3: I wouldn't be surprised, I think. I mean, Jay Z
Speaker 3: and Beyonce have been pretty open about their interest in
Speaker 3: Alistair Crowley for a long time, going back to the
Speaker 3: two thousands. In fact, one of the first blog post
Speaker 3: to ever put up was jay Z when he was
Speaker 3: wearing his Crowley hoodie, and you know.
Speaker 2: That was probably two thousand and seven.
Speaker 3: So yeah, I think it's a great I think it's
Speaker 3: a great there's a great possibility that she's a witch.
Speaker 1: So is it the case that the majority of these
Speaker 1: mega celebrities I've had to go through some kind of
Speaker 1: ritual and compromise themselves to get the promotions to get
Speaker 1: where they are. Is that just part of the cost.
Speaker 2: So it was at least that's been my theory for
Speaker 2: a long time.
Speaker 3: Going back to reading a lot of books on the
Speaker 3: occult and a lot of at the same time. Back
Speaker 3: in the two thousands, I was reading a lot of
Speaker 3: books on how power structures work. I didn't know a
Speaker 3: lot about organized crime and the mafia at that time,
Speaker 3: but as I later learned and read about that stuff,
Speaker 3: I started noticing, well, hey, wait a minute, you got to.
Speaker 2: Make your bones.
Speaker 3: You've got to have you know, you've got to demonstrate
Speaker 3: that you're committed to the organization.
Speaker 2: This is really parallel to what you see in untel agencies, right.
Speaker 3: So and then and then I was reading a lot
Speaker 3: on cults over the years, and I sort of said, well,
Speaker 3: cults expect the same thing. So there's a really close
Speaker 3: parallel between like what you would be expected to do
Speaker 3: if you're going to be, you know, in the CIA,
Speaker 3: what you're expected to do if you're you know, under
Speaker 3: Tony Soprano, and what you're expected to do if you're
Speaker 3: going to be in some cult run by some you know,
Speaker 3: sex freak or whatever. And most of these cults, as
Speaker 3: you as you would imagine, are run by sex freak.
Speaker 3: So it seems like that's an easy pattern to go to,
Speaker 3: probably because of Maslow's hierarchy of needs and a lot
Speaker 3: of people don't know if you get into the history
Speaker 3: of Abraham Maslow when he was doing that hierarchy of
Speaker 3: needs stuff that was for M culture. It was it
Speaker 3: was an adjacent to M culture program because at that time,
Speaker 3: the CIA wanted an easy kind of list of ways
Speaker 3: to profile world leaders. So they were saying, hey, can
Speaker 3: you give us can you come up with some kind
Speaker 3: of like structure to a profile to say, what's motivating?
Speaker 3: Putin you know, what's motivating you know, President g whoever?
Speaker 3: You know, is this a guy who's first and foremost
Speaker 3: interested in sex? Is the interest of impure power? Like
Speaker 3: what's his real motivations? And Maslow, you know, obviously he
Speaker 3: put I think sexuality pretty high up there.
Speaker 2: That's like you're after food. That's a pretty you know,
Speaker 2: love food. Sex, it's a pretty high drive.
Speaker 3: And if you think about it from the vantage point
Speaker 3: of an intelligence agency or organized crime or whatever. I
Speaker 3: just did a lecture on this history book sex Espionage,
Speaker 3: which ties into a lot of this that's a history
Speaker 3: of this practice, and you can tell there's nothing new
Speaker 3: to this.
Speaker 2: People.
Speaker 3: Government's kings have known for millennia that this is one
Speaker 3: of the easiest ways to to blackmail people. So I
Speaker 3: think it makes perfect sense that cults would do this
Speaker 3: humiliation rituals. Even if you don't believe in the occult
Speaker 3: or any of that kind of stuff, like a humiliation
Speaker 3: ritual just makes sense on a pragmatic control level.
Speaker 1: All Right, We've got four filesand watching live across all
Speaker 1: platforms free enough on YouTube. So if you are on YouTube,
Speaker 1: Jay's links are in the description box below this video.
Speaker 1: He's got his act, he's got his YouTube, and there's more.
Speaker 1: Please go down, follow and support his important work. Incentivizes
Speaker 1: the guests come back and be so generous with the
Speaker 1: time like this. Now we kind of have an evening
Speaker 1: like this without bringing the Clinton crime family into its
Speaker 1: what's your thoughts on the Clinton crime family, Jane, just
Speaker 1: in general? First, well, I think.
Speaker 3: That if you go back to the origins of Bill
Speaker 3: and Hillary, and you know, Bill coming out of Arkansas,
Speaker 3: and I think both of them pretty early on were
Speaker 3: spotted by people at a high level. You know, Mark,
Speaker 3: Arkansas is also the Rockefeller State. That's where the Rockefellers
Speaker 3: are based. If you go down there, you'll notice a
Speaker 3: lot of elements of homage to the Clinton to the Rockefellers.
Speaker 3: It's also, by the way, people don't know about Hot Springs.
Speaker 3: It's an old mafia meeting place, goes back to the
Speaker 3: to the days of al Capone and even Kennedy Senior,
Speaker 3: Joe senor.
Speaker 2: There was a lot of deals that were made.
Speaker 3: This was pre Vegas, so pre Vegas the mobsters would
Speaker 3: all go meet in Hot Springs, Arkansas, and uh, there's that.
Speaker 3: I don't think any of that's accident. I think there's
Speaker 3: a lot of connections there. And so the Clintons were
Speaker 3: kind of seen probably as potential people to be groomed
Speaker 3: into fairly high level controllers. I don't think they're necessarily
Speaker 3: at the top of the pyramid, but they're very high
Speaker 3: up on the managerial structure of the world order. They
Speaker 3: were spotted probably at university probably you know, CIA or
Speaker 3: even Rockefeller level people, Rockflller Foundation recruits, and then they
Speaker 3: were sort of groomed into kind of you know, going
Speaker 3: up the ladder being you know, Bill's governor of Arkansas.
Speaker 3: That's all taking place at the time of the Mina Arkansas,
Speaker 3: CIA scandals where the bringing of the cocaine. You have Watergate,
Speaker 3: you have all of these, you know, not Watergate, Whitewater,
Speaker 3: the Whitewater real estate scandals early on the Clinton administration.
Speaker 3: And it's funny you said that because people have forgotten Chinagate.
Speaker 3: And then later on in Whitney's book and book two,
Speaker 3: there's a whole excellent section on Chinagate and how China
Speaker 3: was donating tons of money to the Clinton campaign. If
Speaker 3: you remember in the nineties, it was a huge scandal.
Speaker 3: I mean, I was in high school at the time,
Speaker 3: and I remember it being a big scandal about what
Speaker 3: why is China donating this money? And there's so many
Speaker 3: Chinese operatives involved in the Democratic Party, And that's all true,
Speaker 3: And it ties into Epstein because that's right at the
Speaker 3: same time that Epstein was kind of making linkages with
Speaker 3: the Clintons.
Speaker 2: They were longtime buddies.
Speaker 3: Epstein at one time in the nineties, I think donated
Speaker 3: several ten twenty thousand dollars to the Clinton campaign. So
Speaker 3: I think that was they were groomed into becoming another
Speaker 3: one of these Clinton Global Initiative INNGO Foundation think tank
Speaker 3: control operation things much like Rockfeller Foundation, Carnegie Foundation, all
Speaker 3: of those entities like that, and they're really just big
Speaker 3: organized crime structures.
Speaker 1: What about five more Clinton questions coming off the back
Speaker 1: of that, How do you think Clinton became governor and president?
Speaker 2: I think he was there.
Speaker 3: There's an old clip where David Rockefeller it's a it's
Speaker 3: either a CFR meeting or a Trilateral Commission meeting in
Speaker 3: the early and in the mid nineties. It's an old c
Speaker 3: SPAN clip because se SPAN used to air like the
Speaker 3: live CFR in trilateral meetings. Right, nobody would watch it
Speaker 3: because in the nineties, right, like se SPAN was super boring.
Speaker 2: Why would you watch c SPAN when you can watch.
Speaker 3: Like, you know, Don Laprix and you remember you're not
Speaker 3: from the US, you know what Dalla Prix is. But
Speaker 3: in the nineteen nineties, right you would, nobody would watch
Speaker 3: c SPAN. But c SPAN was like airing all of
Speaker 3: this stuff all the time, which if you paid attention,
Speaker 3: it would tell you like everything that's going on. But
Speaker 3: I just found for example, do you know Victor Ostrowsky
Speaker 3: is I've heard the name, Yeah, so's he's the famous
Speaker 3: Massad guy who left the Massad And then he wrote
Speaker 3: by Way of Deception, which is a famous book. Anyway,
Speaker 3: I found old c Span talks for him, just explaining
Speaker 3: for like two hours on se Span the way all
Speaker 3: these operations work, which you would never see that on TV.
Speaker 3: Like Anyway, Anyway, long story short, David Rockfeller gets up
Speaker 3: there in one of these clips. You can probably find
Speaker 3: it on YouTube or bits you but and he says,
Speaker 3: I'd like.
Speaker 2: To think Bill Clinton here, my boy. He's I don't
Speaker 2: mean literally my boy.
Speaker 3: He could be I don't know, but he's basically saying
Speaker 3: that I brought him to power.
Speaker 1: Yeah, add a little bit to that. I've written a
Speaker 1: book called Clinton, Bush and CIA Conspiracies. I'll have to
Speaker 1: send you a copy of that, Jay, Oh yeah. And
Speaker 1: my theory is that Clinton would play ball with these guys.
Speaker 1: They knew it. He was the most compromisable, yes, pleasiest
Speaker 1: governor out of the state. And this is why the
Speaker 1: CIA picked Yes Arkansas to do the drug drop and
Speaker 1: because he played ball and provided security for the drug
Speaker 1: drops and eliminated Kevin Ives and Don Henry. The boys
Speaker 1: on the Tracks covered it all up with his with
Speaker 1: Fammi Malik, the guy who said they just smote weed
Speaker 1: and fell asleep ridiculous because he played ball with the
Speaker 1: Bush crime family, the Cil of a North, et cetera.
Speaker 1: He parlayed that into the White House.
Speaker 2: Oh that's absolutely correct.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean I could have gone, yeah, go deeper
Speaker 3: into like Daniel Hopsicker's book on that Barry and the
Speaker 3: Boys with Berry Seal all that stuff. Absolutely and like
Speaker 3: Bradley Johnson says, there Rhodes scholar is the avenue, by
Speaker 3: which even quickly says, that's the avenue where you really
Speaker 3: brought up into the power structure. So you're recruited into
Speaker 3: CFR trilateral through like Rhodes Scholarship and c Yeah.
Speaker 1: All right, we're halfway through our hour with Jay Dayah.
Speaker 1: Get your questions in, folks. They are backing up. I
Speaker 1: am saving them all and slowly getting throughedom. Please subscribe
Speaker 1: to his channel. A question from Christian does JA see
Speaker 1: a link between the Clintons and the slots in Waco
Speaker 1: as a ritual or just a foul up.
Speaker 3: I think that that was probably a show of power.
Speaker 3: I remember when it happened, and then I remember afterwards.
Speaker 3: That was around the time I first stumbled upon shall
Speaker 3: we say, Lord Voldemort's documentary. He did a documentary very
Speaker 3: early on about Waco, and you know, his thesis in
Speaker 3: that documentary I think has been born out, which is
Speaker 3: that this is really just the government saying we don't
Speaker 3: care anymore about your civil liberties, constitutional rights.
Speaker 2: We don't care. So that was a sort of I
Speaker 2: think it's a show of four. There could have been,
Speaker 2: you know, a.
Speaker 3: Higher level, a cult ritual aspect to it. I don't
Speaker 3: know about the specifically, but I wouldn't be.
Speaker 1: Surprised thoughts on seth Rich and Mclinton's.
Speaker 3: I don't think that that had anything to do with
Speaker 3: Russia Gate or Russian hacking. I think that he found
Speaker 3: out what was really going on and they probably had
Speaker 3: to take him out, just like Michael who's the guy
Speaker 3: the reporter, Rolling Stone reporter, same situation. He was going
Speaker 3: to report on the generals and the drug trade and
Speaker 3: then his car is commandeered and it crashes. Michael Hastings,
Speaker 3: same situation.
Speaker 1: I'll take a question from the YouTube community wall, and
Speaker 1: that is from KC. Can Jay address Kubrick's films that's
Speaker 1: attempted to expose the dark side of the entertainment system,
Speaker 1: particularly the shining and I wide shut.
Speaker 3: Well, absolutely, In fact, that's the first one hundred pages
Speaker 3: of my first book. So the thing that like hipped
Speaker 3: me to this when I wrote and I didn't write
Speaker 3: this book in twenty sixteen.
Speaker 2: A lot of these essays I wrote in twenty ten
Speaker 2: and eleven.
Speaker 3: And so the first the introduction to my book is
Speaker 3: film as Ritual, and the entire first hundred pages is Hollywood,
Speaker 3: Babylon and Kubrick. And so that encompasses first chapter is
Speaker 3: eyes wide shut, second chapter is the Shining, And so
Speaker 3: I would say absolutely.
Speaker 1: All right, let me go over to the next question.
Speaker 1: Then let's see why was from allowed to beat Hillary?
Speaker 1: Wasn't the other way around? Hillary is allowed to beat Trump?
Speaker 1: Didn't Trump could bumboozled.
Speaker 3: There was a really good article by Roger Stone, I
Speaker 3: thought years ago if it's still available, but it was
Speaker 3: about the the specific CIA guy that they used to
Speaker 3: rig things. Shall we say? I don't know what YouTube
Speaker 3: does and doesn't, but no, I think I think that
Speaker 3: they really thought Hillary.
Speaker 2: Was gonna win.
Speaker 1: Liam is asking is there a second list? I think
Speaker 1: this is to do with the ditty case.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean that's hearsay. I don't know yet. There
Speaker 3: was a fake video going around alleging another list that
Speaker 3: Diddy was going to release or whatever, but that was
Speaker 3: actually like a TikTok fake video.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 3: I wouldn't be surprised. I mean, I don't think there's
Speaker 3: I mean, like they're scrubbing. You saw the celebrities scrubbing
Speaker 3: all their old tweets about Diddy.
Speaker 2: Did you see that? Yeah?
Speaker 3: Yeah, So like I think they're mopping up the the
Speaker 3: receipts right now.
Speaker 1: So did he lawyers brag in that? Did He's going
Speaker 1: to go to trial? He ain't coping for no plea bargain.
Speaker 1: Do you think that it will play out? It will
Speaker 1: go all the way to trial plea bargain, or he'll
Speaker 1: get Epstein.
Speaker 2: I was going to say, I don't think. I think.
Speaker 2: I mean, let's put it this way.
Speaker 3: If they're if this is like the level of people
Speaker 3: and the number of people like Epstein as we suspected,
Speaker 3: then I don't think did he will?
Speaker 2: I mean did? He won't be around too much longer.
Speaker 1: So my theory is that they protect you in the beginning,
Speaker 1: like we saw the Sweetheart deal with Epstein, but when
Speaker 1: the legal problems multiply to the point where they can't
Speaker 1: stop them anymore. As the legal problems multiply in proportion,
Speaker 1: you become a liability to these elites, and they'll they'll
Speaker 1: just snuff you out. But wouldn't that be too obvious
Speaker 1: if they did that. I mean, they've done it to Epstein,
Speaker 1: they did it to John Luke, Brenell Maxwell got a
Speaker 1: pass I think because of a connection to the Clinton
Speaker 1: crime family. Do you think if they snuffed the out
Speaker 1: it would just be a bit too obvious or to
Speaker 1: make it look really like it's something maybe an illness or.
Speaker 3: Yeah, there's a lot of different ways they could do.
Speaker 3: But also don't they don't seem to really care. I mean,
Speaker 3: I think they're really concerned about whether this would wake
Speaker 3: people up. They wouldn't have done that to Epstein, so
Speaker 3: they don't really seem to care. I mean, in the
Speaker 3: history of espionage, when this happens, the pretty much backs
Speaker 3: up what you're saying, Sean, Like, when you become too
Speaker 3: much of a liability, it's just better to just get
Speaker 3: rid of them.
Speaker 1: Jay, we haven't spoken to you since there's been all
Speaker 1: these assassination attempts on Trump, and a few people have
Speaker 1: put that in the chat. What what were your thoughts
Speaker 1: on when that went down.
Speaker 3: I don't think that it was staged. I think that
Speaker 3: they really did try to do that. I think there's
Speaker 3: a lot of the way to the evidence is on
Speaker 3: the side of it doesn't mean Trump's an angel or
Speaker 3: that he's he's perfect, but I think that you know,
Speaker 3: different sections or groups within the power structure, different game
Speaker 3: the power structure, there's there. You know, they really do
Speaker 3: hate Trump, a lot of them. It doesn't make Trump
Speaker 3: a hero. So we got to not think in dialectics,
Speaker 3: because you can have two you can have two gangs
Speaker 3: trying to kill the other gang leader's leader, and it
Speaker 3: doesn't mean the gang leader that's getting killed is like
Speaker 3: the hero or a saint. It just means that there's
Speaker 3: two bad guys fighting. So in the case of Trump,
Speaker 3: I really do think that there's a faction that would
Speaker 3: love to get rid of him, if anything, because they
Speaker 3: are more worried about what he represents than he himself.
Speaker 3: Because even the degree of you know, conspiracy awakening that
Speaker 3: Trump has hipped people to in the last eight years
Speaker 3: of fake news, other things I won't mention on YouTube,
Speaker 3: and I know he's met he's he has huge flaws too,
Speaker 3: because of you know, warp speed, et cetera.
Speaker 2: But I think they're more worried about the base waking
Speaker 2: up than Trump himself.
Speaker 1: Question from f E. I've not heard this before. Did
Speaker 1: you hear about a lot of these rappers having been
Speaker 1: rented for weekends to gay millionaires in Saudi Arabia?
Speaker 2: No? But I wouldn't be surprised.
Speaker 3: I mean, I mean, if you're gonna, if you're if
Speaker 3: you're willing to do whatever to become a rap rap,
Speaker 3: you know, famous rapper, Like, why wouldn't you do that?
Speaker 1: Sure?
Speaker 3: I mean I've been saying that raps fakin game for
Speaker 3: a long time. But I mean, I think this kind
Speaker 3: of dedicates.
Speaker 1: And if you look at the stats that the lawyer busby,
Speaker 1: he said he thought it was going to be mostly
Speaker 1: women and the alleged victims are half men. You said
Speaker 1: he was quite surprised by that.
Speaker 3: Did you see the video somebody posted it was going
Speaker 3: around of French Montana and did he know.
Speaker 1: What's on that?
Speaker 2: It's just them acting.
Speaker 3: They're oiled up with a lot of baby oil and
Speaker 3: they're they're not acting very masculine, shall we say, And
Speaker 3: they're almost naked and it's a birthday party.
Speaker 2: I mean, I'm just saying, like, yeah, I'm not surprised.
Speaker 1: Someone just asked where can they watch Info Wars these days?
Speaker 1: I've been watching it on X Yeah.
Speaker 3: Alex usually puts the fourth hour every time I do it,
Speaker 3: and pretty much every show on X. But there's always
Speaker 3: still a bandot video too.
Speaker 1: All Right, we've got twenty minutes left with Jay Dyer.
Speaker 1: We've got almost five thousand watching across all platforms. Please
Speaker 1: put your questions in. This is your last chance. And
Speaker 1: also Jay's links are in the description box in the
Speaker 1: YouTube version. Please support his important work. He's been a
Speaker 1: friend of the channel for years. He's come on here
Speaker 1: talking about many cases that the mainstream media have not wanted,
Speaker 1: not wanted us talking about, and you know we love
Speaker 1: his in depth research. I'm going to get a question
Speaker 1: from the dashboard, then from the community wall. This is
Speaker 1: from Lena. We'll Oprah give back thousands of acres of
Speaker 1: Maui land that she purchased. Will she give them back
Speaker 1: to the native Maui people?
Speaker 2: No, of course not.
Speaker 3: And I think I think a lot of these people
Speaker 3: at that level that they really get off on hurting people.
Speaker 3: I think there's a certain level of sickness that you
Speaker 3: get to when you're if when you've you've burned out
Speaker 3: your pleasure centers and your brain, your dopamine centers, and
Speaker 3: really the only thing that gives you pleasure is like
Speaker 3: the most depraved type of stuff.
Speaker 2: I think they actually get off on hurting people, so
Speaker 2: I wouldn't.
Speaker 1: Think so, yeah, that's absolutely sickening. So let's see, put
Speaker 1: a one in the chat if you think Oprah is trustworthy.
Speaker 1: Put a two in the chat. If you do not
Speaker 1: think Oprah is trustworthy. Yes, lab management do not do
Speaker 1: not idolize celebrities. Let me go back to questions one second.
Speaker 1: All right, so is Elon Musk trust sworthy? That's from
Speaker 1: open space.
Speaker 3: I think it would be foolish to distrust anybody that's
Speaker 3: a high level person just because so many, so many
Speaker 3: high level people have gotten there by ill gotten gains.
Speaker 3: I don't have any personal negative opinions of Elon, but
Speaker 3: I wouldn't trust anybody in the billionaire sphere. I would
Speaker 3: assume that that. I mean, I want to hope for
Speaker 3: the best, but I don't trust anybody like that.
Speaker 1: Ninety nine point nine percent on the Oprah pol number two,
Speaker 1: what is the Trilateral Commission? That's from ubiquity.
Speaker 3: So basically in the early seventies, Henry Kissinger and David
Speaker 3: Rockefeller are very powerful people, obviously got together and said,
Speaker 3: we've read this book by this guy named Zugni Brazenski,
Speaker 3: and we should basically create a steering committee just for him.
Speaker 3: And so they basically gave him this higher level committee
Speaker 3: called the Trilateral Commission, which would basically be kind of
Speaker 3: you have the Council and Form Relations, which is a
Speaker 3: lot of media, a lot of propaganda, a lot of
Speaker 3: discussions about how to run things in terms of foreign policy,
Speaker 3: and that's sort of a higher levels during committee that
Speaker 3: they created for Zbig.
Speaker 1: So we've got a question from Bennie. My got instinct, Benny,
Speaker 1: is anything that gets big, whether it's a humanitarian cause,
Speaker 1: whether it is a business, especially music and media and movies,
Speaker 1: anything that gets big gets co opted by the dark forces.
Speaker 1: Benny's asking, whilst rap taken over and turned into a
Speaker 1: syop or is it just whack these days?
Speaker 3: I think it was taken over and turned into siout.
Speaker 3: There was a long time rumor that the executives at
Speaker 3: MTV noticed the potentiality of hip hop being turned to
Speaker 3: social engineering designs, and they essentially created Gangster Rapp used
Speaker 3: it as a social engineering tool, put a lot of
Speaker 3: people in jail, I created a lot of thug create
Speaker 3: a lot of business for the private prison complex. And
Speaker 3: so yeah, I think it was absolutely something engineered. That
Speaker 3: doesn't mean rapid So I mean I think Black people were,
Speaker 3: you know, organically creating hip hop, but then that was
Speaker 3: something that the elites socially engineered.
Speaker 1: Jay's got a follow up question on the Trilateral Do
Speaker 1: you think all involved with Trilateral Commission are compromised?
Speaker 3: I don't think necessarily every person who goes into that
Speaker 3: has to be compromised, because there's a lot of people
Speaker 3: who believe in the system and they want to support
Speaker 3: it and further it, and they're fully on board. So
Speaker 3: you don't have to be a sexual degenerate or some
Speaker 3: weirdo to be part of something like that. But it
Speaker 3: certainly helps, I think if you're in the power structure
Speaker 3: for them to control you. So for example, a lot
Speaker 3: of people in the CFI or Trilater or they might
Speaker 3: just be like an academic or a professor or some bureaucrat.
Speaker 3: But I wouldn't be surprised if they aren't all compromised.
Speaker 1: Wow, here's an interesting one, Roderie David Nike. Does J
Speaker 1: think nephelim hybrids are among us today and has he
Speaker 1: heard of the author russ is Da and the Black Awakening?
Speaker 2: I have.
Speaker 3: I think that's more so in the sphere of like
Speaker 3: evangelical end time stuff, which I'm not really in that domain.
Speaker 2: So, I mean, I suppose it's possible.
Speaker 3: That there are nephelim or whatever, but I've not seen
Speaker 3: like any good evidence of it.
Speaker 1: Don't wants to know whether Tom Hanks has anything to
Speaker 1: worry about.
Speaker 3: I think over the years people have pointed out a
Speaker 3: lot of odd things about Tom hanks connections, weird skits
Speaker 3: that he's done, seemingly inappropriate type stuff, But I don't
Speaker 3: know of any particular damning evidence that's that's solid. But
Speaker 3: I wouldn't be surprised. I think a lot of those
Speaker 3: people at that level again, are going to be compromised,
Speaker 3: so I won't be surprised. But I don't know anything
Speaker 3: specifically about time. I mean, he's friends with all the
Speaker 3: same people were talking about.
Speaker 1: So looking at the old videos of Justin Bieber and
Speaker 1: Diddy where they putting the body bump to him and
Speaker 1: they seem to be groping him and stuff. What do
Speaker 1: you think happened though? Do you think something heinous happened?
Speaker 2: Just from the body language, My suspicion is yes. I
Speaker 2: mean again, I don't know.
Speaker 3: But it does look like the way Bieber is acting
Speaker 3: is like he's very uncomfortable. There was another video somebody
Speaker 3: put up to of like a bunch of other celebrities
Speaker 3: acting really weird with him, and he seemed to really
Speaker 3: be feeling awkward. So judging by the body language, I
Speaker 3: would say, yeah, it's also just weird to begin with.
Speaker 3: Why is he spending the night at Diddy's house like
Speaker 3: that just seems bizarre, not totally inappropriate.
Speaker 1: There's another esothetic one directed energy weapon, a nine to
Speaker 1: eleven of MAUI any thoughts.
Speaker 2: I don't have any.
Speaker 3: I don't necessarily think anything DW was used in nine
Speaker 3: to eleven. I mean it's always possible, but and I'm
Speaker 3: very familiar with the evidence. I know about Kathy Woods,
Speaker 3: I know about all that stuff. I think it just
Speaker 3: makes more sense a simpler explanation. It's just that they
Speaker 3: already had things there to go off to pop off,
Speaker 3: and that it was a controlled thing. I know about
Speaker 3: the cars and the melted stuff, and I know about
Speaker 3: all that. I just don't think it's very convincing. We
Speaker 3: don't have to jump to like these wild things people
Speaker 3: like to jump to, like the wildest sensational stuff, when
Speaker 3: there's a lot simpler explanations for what went down. Probably
Speaker 3: so could there have been Dw's and MAUI I suppose,
Speaker 3: But also that could have just been a fire.
Speaker 1: What really happened in Delphi, Indiana? It's a liberty gem
Speaker 1: and Abigail Williams.
Speaker 3: I don't know, I'm not familiar with that.
Speaker 2: Is this the Delphi murders?
Speaker 3: The last I saw by the Delphi murders was that
Speaker 3: they suspected the person that was behind it was involved
Speaker 3: in like neo pagan, like Wotan type stuff.
Speaker 1: If I recall, Paula wants to know, how does the
Speaker 1: Simpsons seem to predict events?
Speaker 3: A lot of those I think are coincidences. But also
Speaker 3: the writers and producers of the Simpsons are famously and
Speaker 3: publicly from Evergreen College, and Evergen College has a long
Speaker 3: time history of also being tied to the CIA. So
Speaker 3: I would say that that's very plausible. That may sound
Speaker 3: crazy to people, but I mean, I wrote two books.
Speaker 3: I'm working on the third book right now about the
Speaker 3: long the long history of intelligence agencies in Hollywood.
Speaker 2: So it's not actually that crazy.
Speaker 1: Thanks for the super chet, Texas, But I am unable
Speaker 1: to say that last word because of YouTube's community guidelines.
Speaker 1: It's got many people in trouble, many associates of mine
Speaker 1: in trouble. But I will do because Jay you mentioned
Speaker 1: is new Brazinski, and I know you've researched the hell
Speaker 1: out of him and Kissinger, and my impression is that
Speaker 1: we're being sold these wars by a philosophy with roots
Speaker 1: in Brazinski and Kissinger and the neocons and this thing
Speaker 1: we've ran in Ukraine. It's all about the military industrial complex.
Speaker 1: And you know, all the mainstream media are like, yeah,
Speaker 1: Putin's this boogeyman, but really they're trying to trick people
Speaker 1: so our taxpayers money, trillions of it, can be spent
Speaker 1: on just blowing people up all over the world, which
Speaker 1: is obscene to me. What do you think about these wars?
Speaker 3: Jay, It's like Smedley Butler said, wars a racket. You know,
Speaker 3: they play on your innate, natural desire for defending your
Speaker 3: your family, your homely and your tribe, and they manipulate
Speaker 3: that healthy desire to go fight for essentially the fortune
Speaker 3: one hundred, fortune five hundred. So that's totally what it's about.
Speaker 3: Has nothing to do with patriotism or defending the homeland.
Speaker 3: It has to do with imperial expansion profits for you know,
Speaker 3: raytheon Boeing, you know, mil trandosal complex, but not just
Speaker 3: the n I see also.
Speaker 2: Starbucks, I mean McDonald's.
Speaker 3: I mean you're fighting to to you know, to to
Speaker 3: ensure that, you know, people in Iraq get a McDonald's.
Speaker 2: And I just don't think that's people are tired of
Speaker 2: dying for that. It's not we're dying for.
Speaker 1: Is Oprah more powerful than did He?
Speaker 3: I would at this juncture suggest yeah, I mean did
Speaker 3: he wasn't invited to a meeting with Warren Buffett and
Speaker 3: George Soros and Bill Gates on how to on how
Speaker 3: to get rid of everybody that Oprah was.
Speaker 1: Do you think mel Gibson knew the depravity of Hollywood?
Speaker 2: Yes?
Speaker 3: In fact, I'm sure you've seen it probably has gone around.
Speaker 3: There was that clip that surfaced from the mid to
Speaker 3: late nineties. I forget which movie he had just made,
Speaker 3: but it was probably one of the lethal weapons in
Speaker 3: the mid nineties. And he's basically saying, I had no
Speaker 3: idea Hollywood was this dark. And then he goes into
Speaker 3: a long story of certain actors that he hung out with,
Speaker 3: producers and others who were into really, really depraved stuff.
Speaker 3: He doesn't exactly say who. People are kind of theorizing
Speaker 3: who he's talking about, but yeah, I think he was.
Speaker 3: He was saying this in the nineties.
Speaker 1: Almost five k in the chat. We've got ten minutes
Speaker 1: left with Jay. Get your questions in, folks, and please
Speaker 1: support his YouTube channel. And the question here is your
Speaker 1: thoughts on the Finders Cold.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: In fact, that was one of the ones in my
Speaker 3: list of these types of operations. I think that was
Speaker 3: an obvious you know, cee how he connected operation. FBI
Speaker 3: declassified all that stuff a few years ago, which, by
Speaker 3: the way, keep in mind, for a long time people
Speaker 3: said this is all crazy conspiracy theories. They said the
Speaker 3: same thing about the claims about the McMartin preschool. FID
Speaker 3: classifyed those documents. Who turns out there were tunnels that
Speaker 3: was in the declassified documents and with the Finders. Oh,
Speaker 3: it turns out a lot of that was true. So
Speaker 3: remember when you hear initially that the mainstream media saying, oh,
Speaker 3: this is all crazy, and then years later we get
Speaker 3: the declassified documents. That doesn't mean that it's all true.
Speaker 3: But a lot of times the essentials or the basic
Speaker 3: principles are true, and so yeah, I would said the
Speaker 3: Finders is another one of these situations where human tr
Speaker 3: A F F I, C K, I, M G is
Speaker 3: connected to new ag schools they set up for children.
Speaker 3: But really this is just a way to sell people.
Speaker 1: Many of The fourth asked is Coca colas the largest
Speaker 1: trucking company in the world and could transport any think
Speaker 1: covered up by the logo.
Speaker 3: I don't know if they're the largest, but one thing
Speaker 3: you do learn, like, for example, when you get into
Speaker 3: a lot of these high profile scandals and criminal cover ups,
Speaker 3: you find that they are sometimes using high level corporations
Speaker 3: for these operations. I don't know in the case of
Speaker 3: Coke obviously, but for example, if you go if you
Speaker 3: get into say the Vatican Bank scandals and Operation Gladio,
Speaker 3: you'll find out that some of the biggest say insurance
Speaker 3: companies were originally CIA Creations, so it's very possible. And
Speaker 3: they were using shipping containers during World War two and
Speaker 3: after to bring in Sicilian heroin, so yeah, it's very possible.
Speaker 1: Question from Joan, how do you account for Epstein's body
Speaker 1: being wheeled out with his face uncovered? It doesn't happen
Speaker 1: by professionals, and I see E M T especially with
Speaker 1: high profile people, seems like theater.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it could be. It's a great question, you know.
Speaker 1: And there's the theory that he's still alive and he's
Speaker 1: on some island with the with the guy from Enron.
Speaker 3: He's on a pleasure island with tattoo and Ricardo Montalban.
Speaker 2: Pleasure what's called.
Speaker 3: The TV show with Ricardo Montalban with the Pleasure Island, isn't.
Speaker 1: He's down there with Kenneth Leh. Yeah, someone's asked about
Speaker 1: twenty times. Asked Jay what he knows about Rachel Chandler.
Speaker 3: I forget which which thing is this is? She's some
Speaker 3: girl that disappeared. I don't remember.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm not familiar either. Were down to our last
Speaker 1: fantasy island with our last We're down to our last
Speaker 1: five minutes Yaalini, do you think did he and Epstein
Speaker 1: were connected as part of a chain together.
Speaker 3: Somebody was theorizing this the other day. I wouldn't be surprised,
Speaker 3: because again, a lot of these things overlap. I don't
Speaker 3: know if that hasn't been substantiated yet. They shanna, have
Speaker 3: you seen anything substantiating that yet?
Speaker 1: No, it seems that we're diddy. You've got it's not
Speaker 1: as steeped in intelligence honey trap operations. It is honey trap,
Speaker 1: but it seems to be more a it's more confined.
Speaker 1: It doesn't seem to have that bigger picture that makes sense.
Speaker 1: You know, you've got Maxwell and Maxwell's dad and promised software,
Speaker 1: and you know, the Epstein thing just went.
Speaker 2: High and intelligences massive.
Speaker 1: As a coster said, it was above his pay grade. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we've got what Ode said about the linkage to the
Speaker 1: secret societies, and he did link it to the private
Speaker 1: jets transport in substances.
Speaker 2: Yes, so I forgot to mention that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there is some linkage, but I don't think it's
Speaker 1: as deep in the intelligence community as Epstein was.
Speaker 3: Right, do you, John, do you think, given your experience
Speaker 3: and knowledge of all this stuff, is it plausible that
Speaker 3: private jets of hip hop stars could be used as
Speaker 3: a way to move product like that?
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think that's totally credible. From Jonathan Odie, you know,
Speaker 1: I think that the private jets are moving people and
Speaker 1: substances all over the world as we speak, whether they're
Speaker 1: private jets, celebs, execs, intelligence, it's prolific, isn't it. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: the average person can't get through an airport because of
Speaker 1: all of the security checks exactly. Well, yeah, well, while
Speaker 1: these people run all that stuff. Question from open space,
Speaker 1: where does Madonna fit into the darkness of the industry?
Speaker 1: Wasn't she into Cabala at one point? How is she
Speaker 1: not being into any dark feelings?
Speaker 3: Oh, she was into Kabbala from the actually the early
Speaker 3: two thousands even and still is. In fact, she just
Speaker 3: put on a concert and I think in Dallas and
Speaker 3: it was still full of all the same satanic imagery
Speaker 3: that video was going all around. I think we covered
Speaker 3: it on my channel as well. So no, she's never
Speaker 3: gone away. I think she's sort of just kind of
Speaker 3: faded away because she was kind of a high priestess
Speaker 3: of pop culture and pop music, the high witch of
Speaker 3: pop music, and then kind of bequeathed this to other
Speaker 3: you know pop stars they initiated into that role, like
Speaker 3: Britney Spears or Katy Perry or Beyonce.
Speaker 2: They kind of took the mantle.
Speaker 3: I mean, you know, Madonna's gotten to be she's a
Speaker 3: grandma age, so I think she's less relevant for pop culture,
Speaker 3: but she is still into Kabala and still pushes all
Speaker 3: the same sort of esoteric stuff.
Speaker 1: You get of thoughts on the power and reach of
Speaker 1: the UK Right family.
Speaker 3: Well, you know, one of the things I didn't get
Speaker 3: to that was going to bring up was Cancora. I'm
Speaker 3: sure you're familiar with that one, and that one the
Speaker 3: Kencorra Boys Home scandal.
Speaker 2: That also that parallels to boys Town in the Franklin scandal.
Speaker 3: It's very similar to Elm Guesthouse, and Kincora included MPs
Speaker 3: like Cyril Smith ed he these are classic, you know
Speaker 3: monsters of the British government. But also I think Prince
Speaker 3: Prince Andrew was in some way connected to Kencora too.
Speaker 3: So a lot of these scandals again you see the
Speaker 3: same pattern. You see probably what is intelligence in those cases,
Speaker 3: Savile British intelligence, Elm guest House, compromising people, and that
Speaker 3: seemed to tie in pretty closely with the Royal Family
Speaker 3: in the sense of I'm sure they have a role
Speaker 3: in wanting dirt and wanting compromising data on people. There's
Speaker 3: no way they could have been that close to Savile
Speaker 3: and not known these things. It would just be i
Speaker 3: think naive to think that that they didn't. I mean,
Speaker 3: this is just part and parcel with how intelligence operations work.
Speaker 3: So I'm sure. I'm sure the Royal family has had
Speaker 3: a role in that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, King Charlesy's mentaw, Lord Mount Batton was.
Speaker 2: Linked to there you go. Mount Mount Matt was a
Speaker 2: famous ped.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, and he got blown up by the IRA.
Speaker 1: All right, let's see next question that we're almost at
Speaker 1: the end here. Kardashians and did they thoughts on that?
Speaker 2: Yeah, In fact, that's kind of out.
Speaker 3: We were just talking about this on the Tripoli's podcast
Speaker 3: two days ago. I think there was a lot of
Speaker 3: clues and indicators in the life of the Kardashians as
Speaker 3: well being involved in this kind of high level of
Speaker 3: cult stuff. In fact, the Christmas card that they sent
Speaker 3: out probably around it was around twenty sixteen somewhere there.
Speaker 3: If you look up the Kardashians Christmas card is the
Speaker 3: one where they're all kind of laid out in this
Speaker 3: weird apocalyptic mall scenario and there's a there's a bunch
Speaker 3: of satanic symbolis hidden in the card.
Speaker 2: For example, there's a giant pyramid.
Speaker 3: With an all seeing eye, you know, which is odd
Speaker 3: because at that time people weren't really connecting Kardashians necessarily
Speaker 3: to global conspiracies. But they seem to be kind of
Speaker 3: touting and proud of of their level of this. You know,
Speaker 3: Kanye comes out of this, it seems to be traumatized,
Speaker 3: I think from a lot of the stuff, and it
Speaker 3: turned out a lot of what Kanye said was true.
Speaker 3: Maybe not everything, but a lot of it has been
Speaker 3: born out. So I would I would not be surprised
Speaker 3: if they're not linked into this at a cult sex
Speaker 3: cult level.
Speaker 1: Could you speculate as to who you think the elites
Speaker 1: linked to Diddy?
Speaker 3: Ah? Well, if it turns out that there is a
Speaker 3: connection with Jeff Stein McCaffrey, I wouldn't be surprised. I
Speaker 3: just think there's a lot of parallels between I agree
Speaker 3: with you, Sean that this is different because the epscene
Speaker 3: thing is massive it's global, it's this is not as
Speaker 3: massive as that. It seems to be something that's more
Speaker 3: confined to the circles of you know, mid level pop
Speaker 3: stars and rappers and you know presidents. Maybe, but I
Speaker 3: would say that there's probably probably high level people involved
Speaker 3: in this, maybe in the intelligence world, maybe moguls in entertainment.
Speaker 1: Jay tell the viewers where they can find and support you,
Speaker 1: please and thank you for your time.
Speaker 2: Absolutely anytime. You know.
Speaker 3: You can find me at jasonalysis dot com, which is
Speaker 3: my website. I got a members section there. You can
Speaker 3: find me on YouTube, you can find me on Twitter,
Speaker 3: you find me on Instagram.
Speaker 2: Everywhere that you find everybody else under my name.
Speaker 3: And then I've got two books on this topic, Ester
Speaker 3: Palywood one and two, which goes into a lot of
Speaker 3: film symbolism, a lot of occult Hollywood, the history of
Speaker 3: all of that. And I've got three hundred pages of
Speaker 3: a third es theyre calle Wood written right now, so
Speaker 3: that'll be out in a couple months. If you go
Speaker 3: to my website you can get to signed copies of
Speaker 3: all my books.
Speaker 2: There.
Speaker 1: Have you got audiobooks available for those? Yeah, I'm just
Speaker 1: going through Charlie Robinson's Octopus of Global Control audiobook. Right now,
Speaker 1: I'm on the Dick Cheney chap. That's great, Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: all right, Jake. So if there's any developments, I mean
Speaker 1: there was tons of questions came in unanswered. Still, if
Speaker 1: there's any developments, we would love to get you back.
Speaker 1: Put one in the chat. If you'd like to see
Speaker 1: Jay come back. If there's any developments, put a two
Speaker 1: in the chat. If you can, bog off, I'll let
Speaker 1: you get on with your knight and I will close
Speaker 1: the show. Thank you, Jay, Thank you, Jean, pleasure, take
Speaker 1: care brother. Thank you. All right. So, like I said,
Speaker 1: Jay's links in the description box, it's unanimously ones, please subscribe.
Speaker 1: Let him know you've come from our channel. And a
Speaker 1: few questions come in that I could address. One of
Speaker 1: them is about oh Jay Shadow. Oh Jay Shadow was
Speaker 1: re putting to us on the Mexican cartels. It seems
Speaker 1: he got arrested. It seems that his YouTube channel has
Speaker 1: been hacked and people are worried that og Shadow is dead.
Speaker 1: We are investigating this. The strange things on his channel,
Speaker 1: like re posting of old videos and people asking for money,
Speaker 1: So we are investigating that. My friend who kept putting
Speaker 1: that in the chats. We're going to be back tomorrow,
Speaker 1: Paul that with Isaac Cappy. I did a good couple
Speaker 1: of hours on Isaac Cappy. It had to be removed
Speaker 1: off YouTube, and it is on My Rumble. A lot
Speaker 1: of the Jeffrey stuff that got removed from YouTube is
Speaker 1: on My Rumble. About Lou's asking about the airport in
Speaker 1: Maine Arkansas? So I wrote a book. Who killed Barry Seal?
Speaker 1: Was it? Pablo Escoba? George hw Bush and I get
Speaker 1: into the details about the airport in Maine at Arkansas
Speaker 1: where Barry Seal is doing the drug drops for the
Speaker 1: Clinton crime family and the CIA and Oliver north of
Speaker 1: Felix Rodriguez and all those guys. And then Barry Seal
Speaker 1: gets expendable, so they put him in a halfway house.
Speaker 1: They let the cartel know where he's staying. They take
Speaker 1: away his bodyguard, they ban him from carry carrying guns,
Speaker 1: and he's a sitting duck. The cartel assassinating him, and
Speaker 1: then he's got George HW's phone number on his corpse.
Speaker 1: Kind of ironic twist at the end, they betraying who
Speaker 1: was really responsible. All right, guys, we'll be back tomorrow
Speaker 1: with more and we're going to try and keep it
Speaker 1: going all this next week. We've got Lionel coming on
Speaker 1: Tuesday night from Lionel Nation. We have got Ryan Dawson hopefully,
Speaker 1: We've got Nick Bryant, We've got Charlie Robinson, many many more.
Speaker 1: So thank you for tuning in, Thank you for all
Speaker 1: your great questions.