Speaker 1: So inside.
Speaker 2: Bunker buncer, Oh, bunker.
Speaker 3: Bunker.
Speaker 4: I got married.
Speaker 5: I got married to a funker who when he got wedded,
come joined in the subway shop.
Speaker 6: I am married.
Speaker 5: I'm married to mytle, but we got joined go white
as soon as subway he.
Speaker 7: Shot specimens and biscuits and minerals. They come to even
to my whole life is spit what you got to do?
Speaker 5: M mm hmm, mother, mother off. I am married to
a funk who we got wedding. We got joined in
the subway.
Speaker 8: He shot.
Speaker 3: And minerals.
Speaker 1: They come to to.
Speaker 8: And little rooms then come from this your.
Speaker 2: Look over, funk over, fuck over, unko.
Speaker 6: I got married.
Speaker 4: Tell the monkeys.
Speaker 6: You kind off in that tree, what you doing up there?
Speaker 8: Why you scared? Why you run it from them?
Speaker 9: Red bad?
Speaker 3: You ran from man to and from me.
Speaker 4: Then till the mote.
Speaker 6: Like the smail monkey.
Speaker 2: Is this double natas between the trees hanging.
Speaker 4: Down upside down?
Speaker 3: That's a smile.
Speaker 4: Then tell the monkey what you doing to me?
Speaker 9: Till till a monkey.
Speaker 4: Till the macky.
Speaker 3: Mm hmmm h.
Speaker 2: Ll the mout, what's you do to me.
Speaker 4: Again?
Speaker 8: So where do we get the Bible from?
Speaker 3: Did you even read the cannons.
Speaker 6: There is only one charge.
Speaker 4: You are in a din occult.
Speaker 8: You're a gobbling a demon, a bull merchard.
Speaker 3: You saw me on your dude, is this for son only? Webs?
I need a gender jew can't tigging.
Speaker 10: He's a little to your boys, n you, dude, I
want plus one plus one equal three.
Speaker 8: It comes out do the tree?
Speaker 4: Why do you pray eat the dead people? The traditions
of man new heretic?
Speaker 3: Un your dude, is this.
Speaker 11: Your son webs shaggy, I need a gender jew can't tigging,
he's a little to your boys, Unmu dudemic justification.
Speaker 8: Two The future.
Speaker 11: Fact, it's that it's okay.
Speaker 3: Wait all right, man, let me get the one as
let me get the one days before.
Speaker 12: Barday's gonna big, big never I've been ladies.
Speaker 3: But it's gonna be all. Let me know. Your nash.
Speaker 2: Said, what's up?
Speaker 13: Y'allah?
Speaker 1: Yeah, y'all?
Speaker 8: What's up?
Speaker 1: Welcome everybody? How y'all doing? Hey? What's up? Cereal? Are
you seeing anybody right now?
Speaker 8: Girl?
Speaker 1: You sound like you a nice little robo shorty.
Speaker 8: Device not found connected to.
Speaker 1: Connect to me? Baby? We need to connect yo, I
got straight. Uh I'm setting traps for Dila monkey.
Speaker 8: Look what I got at? What's up, Matt? You get
a little tempted? Look at that hanging down? Who mad
Dyla monkey?
Speaker 6: Where you at?
Speaker 8: Baby?
Speaker 1: I'm trying to tempt you right now?
Speaker 13: Whoa?
Speaker 1: We straight up banana core over here, laying traps for
the Dila monkey.
Speaker 8: That Dela monkey. You climbed up in that tree? What
you doing up there? Why are you scared?
Speaker 6: Why are you running from that free tea?
Speaker 3: Baby?
Speaker 6: You ran from an to and from me? That del
A monkey?
Speaker 13: You like?
Speaker 8: Dampty email monk. He's with them bananas between the tree.
Speaker 6: He hanging down, upside down and frown.
Speaker 1: Yes, feeling it today, y'all. In fact, some days we
just gotta open it up, you know, with a little
bit of music, You know what I mean. But that's okay,
it's not all day long. It's gonna be about the predilections.
Y'all know about the elections going on. Y'all heard about
what's going on. They over here voting. America is voting
for high school president right now. Who's gonna win?
Speaker 8: Who you got.
Speaker 1: Who you betting on? Are you voting for Cabala Harris
or are you voting for trunk a dunk, back it up,
back it up, back it up. My dad had telling me,
good for what's about angel? And this is where we
find the source that God made. This is to rev
us up, get us a prep for the day's discussion.
We're gonna talk about re elections. We're gonna talk about
uh the good, the bad that We're gonna do little
bit of retrospective. We're gonna talk about my thoughts on politics,
because we never cover that. As you guys know, I
think politics is so genormy and so boring and so
domb We pretty much focus on meta politics and geopolitics.
But today, because the entire world is focused on politics,
and because tomorrow's decisions or day after however many days
they take, will affect many of our pocket books. Is
you know what I'm saying, Uh, A lot of us
will per perhaps wake up quite a bit richer tomorrow.
So that's one net positive of the situation. I'm not
making everything about money. But of course we know that
this is the first election where bitcoin has played a
huge role in the campaign rhetorics, mainly only on the
side of Trump. As you know, we were at the
Bitcoin conference in Nashville, but to meet some cool people,
had a lot of fun. Trump spoke, he did about
thirty minutes a stand up at the Bitcoin conference, and
that's a first. And of course we have RFK Junior,
who is publicly very supportive of Trump now also massively
supporting bitcoin.
Speaker 8: So there are some positives, especially if.
Speaker 1: You are a big time bitcoin proponent, may wake up
a lot richer tomorrow. And I'm speaking, of course, of
as you guys probably know, the very much anticipated one
hundred k bitcoin, which we know will then probably very
soon pop to one fifty.
Speaker 8: We all know this is coming.
Speaker 1: A lot of people been talking about this in the
cryptosphere for many years. Will be a very momentous occasion.
We are very close to altum highs again. We're over
seventy again today, which is inching up. I think this
is anticipating, anticipatory for the outcome of the election. I
expect if there is a announcement of a Trump win,
Bitcoin will immediately rocket to eighty eighty five. And the
word is, of course that the big institutional players that
have been buying a lot have actually continued to buy
a lot, and it's not really yet reflected in the
public displays that are of the bitcoin price that are
based on the exchange rates, because many of these big
institutional players are not buying them on the normal exchanges
where the normies are buying them. They're buying them directly
from coinbase and not the public exchange, so we're not
necessarily seeing that reflected it, and that could lead to
a big supply crunch. And of course, as we talked
about a few days ago, the big announcement for micro
Strategy to build a forty two billion dollar bitcoin bank
of some sort in the next year, I think is
what he said, that will of course easily well, it
will at least participate in this supply crunch and continued
skyrocketing both for Bitcoin and micro Strategy stock.
Speaker 12: Enough of these people, a bunch of Christian mus come
build GiB death facts, keeping babies alive?
Speaker 8: Come on, everybody, you need to know about these people?
How the word to face these scumb the.
Speaker 11: Literally all out from underwracks, the dream face and the
run around scream, a wheel of.
Speaker 4: Saying we water to eat babies.
Speaker 8: I have them on video.
Speaker 12: Killer is in the creepy Weired six stop Men She
sleeps saying the same with a creepy, weird old woman
whose mother was a hood of her head. The woman
number one is ugly.
Speaker 6: Imagine how bad she smells.
Speaker 8: Man, I told her an Obama, just steak.
Speaker 6: Bama and the bossman like sofa.
Speaker 12: You blue Jamphire up be copings, hobbling around after us
scary kids.
Speaker 6: So Si even had a feeling cold. We are such
self syndocraft.
Speaker 12: We're even noticing itself rising against us. Millions of blady
people love the very worst consult kills.
Speaker 8: Don't come at the moment. Oh oh, you don't have
your son.
Speaker 12: Stand you hear the bus night and the past is
gonna say.
Speaker 6: We all our smilies, we love our musbrooms.
Speaker 8: All they're so sweet, all this so sweeping.
Speaker 1: M y'all feel it today, y'all feel in the election,
y'all feeling the relection. It's that kind of a day.
And you know when I pop on here singing into
my banana Mike full on banana corp. It's about to
get off of the hook, is it not?
Speaker 8: You know it is now.
Speaker 1: Relections re elections. Well, first thing to say about reelections
is to keep in mind that doctor Carol Quigley, in
his famous Tragedy and Hope. Text from many years ago,
laying out the vantage point of the establishment during the
Cold War noted that elections have in the US at
the presidential level been pretty much controlled going back sixty
seventy eighty years.
Speaker 8: So it was around the.
Speaker 1: Time of you could say, the creation of the FED
that also the executive branch was maybe not totally, not
one hundred percent, but largely under the sway of the
power structure. And so I wouldn't go so far as
to say that elections don't in any way matter, but
that from the time of the establishment of the FED,
you had the emergence really of the economic dominance of
our country from an inner party. After that, there were
some decades before this structure began to consolidate power through
other key entities that were erected again sort of backdoor
inner party bureaucracy entities that were set up beyond economic
monetary control. This would be entities like the Council and Formulations,
later the Trilateral Mission, later the Builderberg Group, etc. All
of these non governmental, private corporate entities that were set
up with the support from very wealthy oligarchical Eastern Seaboard
and British elite families. Those families constitute what we call
the Eastern Establishment. That doesn't mean that they're only located
in the East. This includes other wealthy families all the
way down to the Dixie elites, the eventually oil magnate elites,
and of course the military industrial industrial complex elites, which
are not limited only to the Eastern Seaboard. But of
course the reason we talk about the Eastern Seaboard elite
has a lot to do with the Eastern Establishment institutions
and universities that where were the really the breeding grounds
and the sources from which the power structure would raw
its future generations of leaders. And so, for example, the
OSS and the CIA largely during these time periods of
the forties, fifties, sixties, and seventies were recruiting from places
like Princeton, Yale, Harvard, etc. So this really became the
strongholds of this no longer isolationist or Americanist foreign policy.
But the CFR promoted transition into an internationalist minded agenda.
That was the plan actually of the British Royal society
and Fabian elites who sought through many decades to convince
the American establishment to jump on board with foreign interventionism
adventurism in world policing. They attempted with the League of
Nations to first do this, and that failed. At that time,
the United States still had enough notion of its founding
ideas of non interventionism and not policing the world to
reject the ideas of the League of Nations and so forth,
and so they went back to the drawing board. A
few decades later, we get the Second World War by design,
and we get the solution out of this dialectical dilemma
thesis antithesis, synthesis being the United Nations and the idea
of a global peacekeeping entity. Supposedly that would be a
nascent future proto world government model. It probably will not
be the final stage technocratic model, but was intended to
be there as this seed form. And of course the
Rockefeller family had a massive role in helping to set
that up, as well as the Council for Relations, as
well as Trail out or Commission. And I'm not locating
it only in the power of the Rockefellers. Of course,
there are many elite families of varying ethnicities that played
a key role in helping to set up these kinds
of structures that are the real power the throne. And
so the first thing I want to talk about, because
we are going to talk about some of the reality today,
is a Cameron made a great video krolmcgregor's son on
the bureaucracy, and this is really the best sort of
level one analysis.
Speaker 14: That we could have.
Speaker 1: Because lots of people say, well, well, you talk about
you know this other entity control things, Well, who is that?
Speaker 8: Who is that?
Speaker 1: Well, at the most basic level, we're going to listen
to camera's video here and work through this entrenched we
could call it outer layer of the bureaucracy, and that's
who first and foremost kind of is running stuff. They're
not necessarily at the top of everything, because these are
government institutions and entities that do definitely have a lot
of power, but they're the ones that the president first
and foremost can't necessarily immediately get control of. And we
have to understand this because a lot of normies, a
lot of simple minded people out there, they're waking up,
and that's great and that's moving in the right direction.
But for one, just because the limitations of the executive
branch in the American system the president's really limited with
what he can do anyway. But even in a sort
of a maximalist approach of the presidency, at the max,
you know, Trump really could only do certain things were
he a completely reform overhaul minded individual.
Speaker 8: I hope that he is.
Speaker 1: I always want to hope for the best. Of course,
the last go round that did not fare very well.
Drain the swamp swamp ended up being art of the
deal to put a bunch of swamp people in and
so that was a massive failure. Other projects, you know,
fast speed was a massive failure, and so really I
think the best that we can hope for from that
focal point. It's a very visibly media powerful office the presidency,
right because of the perception of the powers that are there.
But as for actual real power, it's very limited. So
the best that we can hope for is maybe a
staving off of some of these horrible policies that are
absolutely fast tracking the destruction of the country. But in
order to really fix things, to really quote save the country,
you need much more than that. You would need an
overhauling first and foremost probably of these bureaucracies. And so
Camera's correct here, but there's other entities beyond these governmental
bureaucracies that are entrenched that would also have to be removed.
You would have to also go after the irs taw
to reserve these kinds of things. And amazingly Trump has
mentioned these things. I think we're all mature enough over
here to recognize campaign rhetoric, because you know, I'm not.
I've been watching presidential elections since the nineties. I wasn't
super involved in politics in the nineties, but you know,
I was coming of age in the in the late nineties.
I was, you know, graduating high school, kind of trying
to understand what's going on out there. I remember, you know,
first being interested in the Bush. Was it bush Gore?
It was Bush Gore? And that one is interesting and
relevant because that was when you first started hearing about
shall we say interference. There was a big hubbub made
by the left at the time to fuss about Diebold.
Many documentaries were made, many interviews were being had at
the time. I remember around that time was the first
my introduction to Lord Valdemort. I began to watch Lord
Baldemot back around that time, so I'd said around two
thousand and one, two three four in there and you
started hearing the left making a big fuss.
Speaker 8: Oh Bush stole it from Gore. Now, election fixing is
not new. It's a very old, well known thing.
Speaker 1: If we go back to the famed cases of the Kennedys,
the mafia famously was brought in to help through the
unions and others to sway elections in Chicago and other places.
If I recall for the Kennedys, I think that's right,
and that was Joe Senior, you know, kind of pulling
the strings. And as you guys know, we covered a
few days ago the history of the nineteen fifty three
i ran Cia coup, which kind of forms a pattern
for shall we say, deep state coup and how they operate,
and that helps us gives us an insight into the
modus operandi of how that is refracted in history whenever
you have these kinds of regime change operations, and regime
change operation doesn't only exist in the foreign sphere. It
could also happen in the domestic sphere. So if we
keep those things in mind, we begin to pick a
part and understand what's really going on. So let's get
to layer level one of the entrenched bureaucracy and how
and why Trump can't fix that, although he can be
very vocal and he can continue to hopefully talk about
good things despite all the other criticisms that we have obviously,
and we'll get to, you know, other things in history
to look to. Nobody pays attention to history. This is
what's weird to me is that, you know, like I
was saying, I'm not new to politics. I've been. I
got really involved in the two thousands in the Ron
Paul Rampoll day listening and being very interested in campaigning
and this kind of stuff. So you know, I'm not
a new kid on the block here. I'm more like
Jenny from the Block than a new kid on the block.
Speaker 8: Right, don't be fooled by.
Speaker 1: The rocks that I got. I'm just Jenny from the block.
So again, hope your diddy oil is in the microwave.
Is it warming up? I hope? So you're ready because
we're about to kick it off. Let's get into Cameron's
video and understand the first layer of the bureaucracy, and
then we'll get into more of the history and other things.
Speaker 15: I try has suffered severe consequences like assassination or impeachment.
That all demonstrates the fact that presidents cannot control the
US government. In order to do so, you would need
to fundamentally overhaul and reorganize the government itself, and that
would require a kind of of revolutionary party apparatus, a
separatist reform movement that would restaff reorganize a completely overhauled government.
Speaker 9: As its structured. Today, Welcome back to men and the city.
Speaker 15: In today's video, we are going to talk about why
the next president will fail. Abraham Lincoln once said that
the dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the
stormy present. Well, one of the persistent dogmas of our
time is that elections have consequences. Indeed, this is what
we are being told on a daily basis about the
upcoming presidential election, that it is the most important election
in our lifetimes. But any keen observer of Western politics
in general and the United States specifically will note that
in recent times elections do not have consequences, that despite
the coming and going of elected officials, nothing meaningfully changes
or reform.
Speaker 9: Why is that? That is the subject of today's video.
Speaker 15: I think there are three major reasons why presidential elections
at this point are all but irrelevant. The first reason
is control. In order for the president to exert control
over the US government at a minimum, the president must
control three things.
Speaker 9: I call it the triad.
Speaker 15: He must control the executive branch, the fifteen some on
departments that fall under the direct purview of the President
of the United States. These are departments like Justice or
Treasury or Homeland Security for example. The second of the
trias and military industrial complex itself, and that goes well
beyond simply the Defense department. It includes the feeder systems,
the nonprofits, the think tanks, the special interests that all
more or less drive our foreign policy and our national
security strategy forward, independently of any elected officials.
Speaker 14: Right.
Speaker 1: Let's comment on this the first two of Cameron's three here.
This is absolutely essential to understanding really politics at all
and how it functions in today's In modernity, the president
and the branches don't really run things, right, so you
have the legislative, the executive, judicial. Those branches do enact things,
they do things, but they're not necessarily calling the shots,
or the level to which they call the shots can
be very limited, depending upon how complicit and willing they
are to go along with the entrenched bureaucracy that we're
talking about, which is not just a bureaucracy that's governmental.
This is a key point to stress against the libertarians
who will hear something like this and immediately assume that
the problems are these wasteful government entities. That's only half
of the story. In fact, when he mentioned the military
industrial complex, that element of the Defense Department, or the
Department of War as it used to be called, that
is intimately bound up with the corporate interests that profit
from war. They have no desire to cease the wars.
They want more wars. There should be one oh one,
and so war is a racket. As General Smedley Butler
said a long time ago, war is one of the
most profitable enterprises out there. In fact, it might be
the most profitable, perhaps up there with a fiat currency,
perhaps up there with human TRAFFICKI and g All of
those things are part of parcel of the machine, as
we might call it. Well God, my son to the
messide which, of course Pink Floyd are actually now voices
and promoters of the machine. Ironically, they plaster their profiles
with everything that every establishment democrat boomer imagines But regardless,
this intrenched bureaucracy here again is not a purely governmental function.
It is a public private partnership of shareholders in Raytheon, Boeing, etc.
These large defense companies that have much more power and
influence than any senator, politician or whatever. They essentially can
buy the politicians and the senators and so forth. And
that's why you don't find at the time of actual
policy enactments or law enactments real opposition to the wars.
You find opposition to the war during campaign times, and
then when the officials get in suddenly they flip. Well
that's because there's nothing really that can stop or hold
back these kinds of entities other than mass public dissatisfaction
with the war machine. But as we've seen since going
back to the pre nine event times, which I've been
watching and you know, analyzing all of this stuff since
pre nine, if you look at something like the pre
nine event that really ramped up in the perfect strategic
planning of the project for a new American century was
the basis for the justification for the rebuilding of the
American war machine. Now, again, these are not wars fought
for defensive purposes. I could understand in two thousand and
two three, you know, a lot less information was available
to people. Back then. People were still on the law
the whole very normy. So I can understand them not
really grasping or getting the power of the military industrial complex.
But post Big Nine event was really where people began
to question the wars in the modern area. I know
people were questioning the wars in Vietnam, but the defense
contractors and wait a minute, Kellogg, Brown, Root, Raytheon, Boeing, etc.
These entities seem to be profiting immensely dine Core et cetera.
How are they making so much, Well, it's from the conflicts,
and so they have a vested interest in things like
Big Nine, things like Ukraine conflict, et cetera, et cetera,
things like toppling a SOD. Other players as well, foreign governments,
foreign Middle Eastern governments have interests in getting the American
war machine to go and fight for them and with
them greater nation state projects, if you catch my meaning.
In the Middle East, these play a huge role in
this military industrial complex structure, which plays on the patriotism,
of which is goodwilled and natural to people. But it
plays on the natural desire that you have to get
you to fight for coke, pepsi and abration and subway.
Speaker 8: You see.
Speaker 1: So that's really that structure, just in the mic side
of things and how it operates. And that's just one component.
You could include the oil companies in that as well.
And when I say that, I'm not advocating for.
Speaker 2: Oh well, electronic electric vehicles will be the solution of everything.
Speaker 1: I'm just simply stating the facts as they are about
real world geopolitics. There obviously was a big factor in
terms of oil in the Middle East, which is ironic
because we don't really need foreign oil, but it was
Kissinger and the Builderberg Group as part of this power
structure that I'm talking about that placed us intentionally on
dependence on foreign oil, which is a part and parcel
of this foreign interventionism that we supposedly have to do.
So whenever Trump talks about opening up and drilling oil
here natively, that's another huge problem that these people don't want.
They do not stand to gain anything and stand in fact,
they stand to lose a lot were that to happen.
This is ironic because the Left, which if you remember
back to post Big nine, it was the Left that
championed questioning all of these things. The biggest irony of
the most insane good think level Theta clear mind control
programming I've ever seen, is precisely the flipping of the
Left from being anti corporate to worshiping corporations in our day.
It's insane. Kouf literally made every leftist a complete mouthpiece
goblin of the Fortune one hundred. It's wild never seen
anything like that, but that really convinced me of the
principles that Orwell lays out, that they're not merely literary,
they're actual mind control principles that could literally flip a
person into advocating the most insane stuff within a few years,
literally flip their position to the exact opposite, worshiping the
Fortune one hundred, which were formerly a few years earlier,
the greatest enemy, the warmonger, and now they're the savior.
The sacraments are had by the Fortune one hundred to
the left, the left seas and worships at the altar
of the Fortune one hundred, giving them their booster sacraments.
Speaker 15: Leg of this triad consists of the intelligence and apparatus.
Speaker 9: Now specifically, there are three main punts.
Speaker 8: Now this is huge.
Speaker 1: Do you understand why for so long on my channel,
I've talked about the history of the intelligence agencies, the
history of how they operate, what they do. It is
precisely because of what Cameron is telling you in this video.
Until those things are resolved, the president is really emasculated.
I don't mean as an individual, he's emasculated. Trump is
very much alpha. He's very alpha chat, no doubt about it.
But in terms of actual power, he's restricted because of
the power that these entrenched bureaucracies actually possess.
Speaker 15: That'trial intelligence agency that basically operates intendently. The second is
a National security agency, which falls under the Defense Department,
and the third is the Federal Bureau of Investigation the FBI,
which falls under the Justice Department.
Speaker 1: You can't always plan when you'll need a gun.
Speaker 8: Rational gun owners carry not because.
Speaker 15: No president in recent history has been able to get
control of the triad, and presidents that tried, presidents like
jfk Or Richard Nixon and in recent years, Donald Trump,
have suffered severe consequences like assassination or impeachment.
Speaker 9: That all demonstrates the fact.
Speaker 1: That now, what's amazing about this point in the discussion
is that if you remember, the heads of these agencies
are so bold and brazen in our day that they
can openly speak about what they want to do and
plan to do to remove the elected executive branch official.
Isn't that pretty wild? If you ever doubted any of
the things you hear me talk about, We'll go and
look at mud and others, Pelosi and others who have
literally openly said that Trump needs to be this that
you know what I'm saying, right, They're able to freely
and openly say it, and yet it's still called insane
ct right tenfoil things. Even though these people can openly
say these things.
Speaker 8: That's pretty wild. That's when you're living.
Speaker 1: In an Orwellian type of dystopia basically, and not.
Speaker 9: Control the US government.
Speaker 15: Well, the second reason why the presidential election doesn't much
matter is because of breakdown. Now, what is the US
government today? Well, basically, it's three major programs. It's the
New Deal from the nineteen thirties, which gave us social Security,
unemployment insurance, and food stamps. It's the Military Industrial Complex itself,
so named by President Isaac, which gave us the services, Army, Navy,
Marine Corps, Air.
Speaker 9: Force, and Coast Guard.
Speaker 15: It gave us the Nuclear triad, and it gave us
all kinds of off the book or hidden intelligence agencies
and departments that haven't been controlled for decades.
Speaker 9: The third program is the Great Society.
Speaker 15: The Great Society gave us Medicare, Medicaid, housing and urban development,
the Civil Rights Act, so forth, and so on.
Speaker 9: Well, if you look at the budget.
Speaker 1: Now, essentially here he's talking about the bloviation and the expansion.
Much like you see the body of say Erica Bara
beloviating and expanding in great measure, the federal government beloviated
and expanded under these so called projects that are really
just forms of socialism. It's not full on outright communism.
But as you guys know, going back to the Fabian model,
they decided a long time ago not to go for
the outright, full on revolution overnight. That model doesn't work.
It's not very effective. What's much more effective is a
very slow, decades long model of rolling out Fabian socialism,
rolling out socialism through things like this that just again
gradually expand this machine, this beast that just keeps expanding
through essentially theft. It's essentially just stealing from the population.
The public under the guise of creating things like a
great society, the welfare state, and so forth. That's just
one arm of this giant machine, all of which is
largely frauds and scams. I know there are EBT cards,
and I know many of us love to sing the
songs Whye my Ebt' shy my ebt' shy my ebt right.
But despite those esthetically pleasing musical hits, in reality this
system is a large fraud system that has now been
expanded to be given to on purpose and offered to
people brought in not from here. If you catch my
drift of the United States today, what is In other words,
it's a weapon. Do you understand what I'm saying. It's
a social engineering weapon, great society, EBT food stamps, all
of that. It's not just theft, it's also social engineering
to get.
Speaker 8: To create a blob mass of totally.
Speaker 1: Mind controlled zombie people. We're going to see some examples
of these zombie the Kamala people, the White Boys for
Kamala right, et cetera, et cetera. To create this gollumn
zombie minded mass of individuals who can be turned at
will like a giant love crafty and entity from beyond
three partrams.
Speaker 9: That's where all the spending is allocate.
Speaker 15: We spent about a trillion dollars a year on defense alone,
and the rest of all of our revenue goes to
paying for Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security, which have become
mandatory spending programs by law that basically eat up the
entire federal budget.
Speaker 9: So that tells you exactly what the federal government really is. Now.
Speaker 15: What's noteworthy about those three programs is not simply the
morass of agencies and departments that govern them and the
bureaucracies that administer them. It's also the age of the programs.
The New Deal is a legacy of the nineteen thirties.
It's almost one hundred years old. The military industrial complex,
as I said, goes back to the fifties, and the
Great Society goes back to the nineteen sixties. So what
you can observe is that the governmental structure that we
currently have to deal with is breaking down because it's old,
it's crupit, it's unnecessarily large and unwieldy. But again, the
President of the United States, whomever they may be, can't
get control of it.
Speaker 9: Can't.
Speaker 1: Now that's a great point, right. The bureaucracy is so
bloviated and so massive. It's also just because of that size,
it's difficult and probably impossible for a president to get
control of it. Now, the other thing, too, is that
we know that if there is a trunk a dont tomorrow,
if there's a victory, the system will immediately go into
the next round of throwing all of its energy, weight,
money and apparatus into Russia Gate three point zero. Now
that may not be actually Russia, it could be who
knows what. And we saw that the previous time around. Fauci,
for example, told.
Speaker 8: Us trumpel had to deal with something like a paintaby, Right.
Speaker 1: So we got kind of indicators and signs and signals
and foreshadowing from the puppet masters. I'm not saying that
Fauci is actually a puppet masteries a frontispiece, but that
there would be certain things that would happen that would
cause significant disruptions to allowing really this president to do
anything or to affect anything, or to change anything. And
so we know that even if let's say Trump says.
Speaker 14: We're gonna have an overhaul, it's gonna be a great Overhall,
the greatest overall.
Speaker 8: Really, have we've seen this?
Speaker 14: Really? It's an amazing overall. We're gonna get rid of
this guy over here, Kamala, Have you seen this Gabala?
I don't think she's very smud. I know they do
you do you think she's smud. I don't think she's smud.
Speaker 8: Can she do mathematics?
Speaker 10: I know?
Speaker 14: Two plus too for I don't think she knows where
she is even. Really, can we get rid of all
this bloviated xish? Maybe we can, We'll she.
Speaker 1: I think Trump, even if you were able to try
to clean house and all this stuff, the system will
put so much pressure again through another hoax. And by
the way, it doesn't even at this point matter really
like how much legitimacy there is to these things. But
you know that the same entities, the British intelligence structures
that we're working with Hillary to create the Steele dossier
and all that, you know, they've already gotten the next
thing kind of in the works. Now. The good news
is that all of those, the legal indictments and the
steel Piece Gate stuff, all of that failed, which is
kind of surprising because usually that seems to work at
least previous presidents have not been as teflon teflon dawn right,
like John Gotti or something in dealing with that level
of opposition, And so I don't know what they'll cook up,
but it doesn't really matter because there is still this
mindless gollumn level thirty percent of the population that will
believe anything, and so there will be enough energy and
momentum even if it's completely preposterous, as Russia get always was.
As we said from the very beginning, that it will
cause Trump to have to constantly focus and talk about
it to the detriment of getting anything done. And just
like the last time around, there will be so much
attention to focus on something completely i'm sure made up,
that it will be an exercising kind of exhaustion, sort
of like how Brazenski basically got the Soviet so bogged
down in nineteen seventy nine Afghanistan that eventually the Soviets
the empire ended up collapsing because they were exhausted from
all of these scan all of these conflicts. And so
probably the establishment is going to continue to try to
unleash just NonStop fake scandals, uh to bog down the administration,
to where nothing actually ever gets done. Again. I'm not
saying that that will be successful per se. Maybe Trump
will get some things done. I know that right away
what we will see is movement up of the stock market,
crypto popping off. That's that's probably what will happen.
Speaker 8: So what do I think will happen? I think probably
at this day, just looking like.
Speaker 1: It's edging towards Trump right now, I believe that in
the real world it's a landslide Trump. It's obvious that
Kamala did not have hardly any ground swell support. I
think the the polls are fake, but we can't underestimate
the ability and the power of the system to do
and sway things as they want. That's my assessment at
this point. But remember, even if Trump wins and all
the MAGA people will be celebrating in this and that
that doesn't like there could be OKC type events right
from loans and people that are say hyped up into
that right away. And I agree with Lord Voldemort that
that's probably already what the system is wanting to roll out.
So that's my prediction. Should there tomorrow be a trunk
a dunk victory, if there is a announcement of some
Kabbala Harris Victory. I do not expect there to be
actual organic revolutions uprising or something like this. There could
be the provocateuring of that. I mean, we could go
into full on like you know Kamama announces, like the
nanny state, like the full on lockdown. I mean that's possible.
I think they would need probably some crises for that
to occur. I am kind of surprised at the level
of calmness that we've seen. I did see a couple
of news stories where they were alleging, shall we say,
light skinned supremacists who were like teenagers were planning to
take out power grids. Who believes that teenagers and like,
you know, fat and nerdy dudes are gonna Actually I'm
not kidding. On an NBC news story today that's chunky
white dudes were planning to take down the power grid. Okay,
who really believes that? Well, like the thirty percent Kamala
people believe that, right anyway, So the system really has
to have depending upon what's let me take that back, actually,
regardless of what's announced tomorrow, it seems like we've got
to have there's got to be some crises, right, what
are the manufactured crises? It seems like most likely something
to do with skin color race type things, right, which
I believe will completely be manufactured and provocateured. Those kinds
of organic events are very rare. They're just not real.
But the system, the establishment, it's narrative, it's story. Remember
going back to creepy Joe. Remember when Joe was up
there with that like dictatorship level stuff in the background,
like nineteen eighty four, red black background, remember that, And
it was all about we got a defeat the you know,
cracker supremacy going on, that kind of stuff. Remember that
this thing, Remember this creepy ass thing that scared everybody
to death, and you know, Joe's up there whispering about
taking care of the the threat of the you know,
cracker supremacists. And it is kind of surprising to me
that they they didn't even go for any policy. That's
kind of wild.
Speaker 8: Like literally, the only thing that they ended up.
Speaker 1: Running Kamala on was abrations and stopping uh Trump from
becoming Heathler, right, tiny mustache man, that's all they That's
that's kind of wild. But what does that tell you
about their base? Right? That tells you that the people
supporting this are literally some of the stupidest people imaginable.
Like they're actually just running on still Trump, Heatler and
Abrastion's free. That's it. That's that's the policies pretty wild,
and that in like Kamala's crazy seventy percent taxes or
whatever whatever her crazy capital gains, like straight up, like
even Carl Marx is over there sweating when she's like,
He's like, well, that's that's pretty wild. Even Carl Marx
is getting nervous about Kamala's tax plan. By the way,
thank you, we got over fourteen hundred if you would
hit like and share, it's just it. Don't you think
that's kind of wild?
Speaker 8: Two?
Speaker 1: I mean, let's go back. I think back to the Democrats,
going back to like bush Gore Day's right, I mean
bush Gore days, the Dems were very heavily focused on
their policies. And as I tweeted this this week, another
thing that's kind of shocking is the Democrats in the
Bush Gore even Clinton days, we're running on these platforms
of the wall and how illegal immigration hurts American workers.
That's wild to see them.
Speaker 8: Become the ultimate NAFTA gat.
Speaker 1: Party. Remember Ross Perrot, It's a second Sam, It's a
second Xam. It's a second Sam. And I take that
back about Gore because al Gore was actually pro NAFTA.
But Clinton. You can find the old Clinton's beaches of
him running against open borders. But if I remember, I think, yeah,
Gore was like, it's gonna be great, Larry Off is great,
that's what he was running on. But but Clinton was
actually running on shutting down the border because it's hurting
the workers. What's up? Everybody's shout out to We got
almost fifteen hundred We did hit over fifteen hundred minute ago.
If you are enjoying the stream hit like, also support
the stream via super chats. Nobody's everybody's what's up with
all the stinginess today? Look at this audience ought to
be happy because it's looking like we're gonna get a
Trump announcement of victory. That doesn't mean the country's fixed,
because we're we talk about the real issues over here.
We don't play into these fantasies of like what normies think,
like we do real analysis over here. So you know,
I'm gonna be straight up until you know Trump can't
fix the country. We can begin to have discussions about
how the country can be fixed down the road. So
the biggest positive of Trump is that Trump has broken
through the public discussion clampdown. That's it. If we think
back to the first Trump administration, Trump ran on anti war,
Trump ran on fixing the economy. If you remember, Trump
even ran on anti Stabby remember that again. One of
the biggest failures was not keeping to that anti stab
beat stuff. In the campaign rheteric period, Trump ran on
even criticizing Federal Reserve. Trump ran again anti war, drained
the swamp. Trump twenty sixteen was Pepe meme dark energy
in a good sense, right, the real dark Maga original.
Speaker 8: Era edgy stuff.
Speaker 1: Same time, Also, what was happened twenty sixteen, remember that
JBP Peterson breaking through. So that was a very crucial
lunchpin period of pivot period when the mainstream story and
narrative was really beginning to be challenged at a level
we've never seen. Remember, at that time, Lord Voldemort was
blowing up. I mean, the show was massive, millions and
millions and millions of views every day. At that time,
things were looking pretty good on the upside. At that
time twenty sixteen. What were the major mistakes being made
at that time? Well, immediately, what did Trump do? Now,
I heard that in the inner whisperings that certain deals
were made about RNC money. Trump ran that I'm a billionaire,
I don't need RNC money and so therefore they can't
bind me. Remember that was another big campaign slogan.
Speaker 14: I can't be but I'm a billion I don't need
them money.
Speaker 8: I got my own money. I don't need it. They
can't control me. As great as wonderful, really.
Speaker 1: Remember this, But the temptation to take RNC money and
then put the worst possible people like Bolton and all
these goons, immediately demoralized his base. Everybody got immediately mad
at the time. Now, I have been through enough of
this stuff over the years that I didn't have high expectations.
But the biggest plus of twenty sixteen Arrow was to
be able to begin to talk about how the mainstream
narratives are fake and what was the big thing then fake.
Speaker 8: Newsh Look at the fake news, look back there at
the cameras.
Speaker 14: They won't show it, they won't show the crowd. The
fake news media, they're amazing, really probably gonna lie, don't
you They were probably gonna lie, I think pretty much
an lij What do you do?
Speaker 8: They're like Joe, sleepy Joe.
Speaker 14: They're all gonna lie. Really, what do you think?
Speaker 8: They're all lying?
Speaker 1: And that's the first break that we saw and Trump
had this just reckless, just making fun of everybody.
Speaker 8: Jeb Michael Rubio, look at this Guy's just shit, low energy.
Speaker 1: Remember, it was funny and everybody was like, whoa this
We've never seen anything like this. We've never seen somebody
just like a wrecking ball, just making fun of everybody,
blasting out tweets, and it worked, it worked.
Speaker 8: It was crazy. But then the reality caught up to
the rhetoric and it was pretty quick that not only
did Trump make some mistakes.
Speaker 1: With who he appointed and all of that there was
originally wasn't there Remember back twenty sixty, was there like
an original kind of cast of Patriot characters. There was
like Flynn and Colonel McGregor and these, you know, decent characters,
good characters. And then everything was done by the establishment
to clear all those people out and immediately incomes the swamp.
So this was the huge This was massive mistakes, massive mistakes,
Thank you, I appreciate that I have been working on
my Trump. I think it is getting better, almost as
good as gillis saying, hey, thank you appreciate that it
is getting better.
Speaker 8: What was the secret to all of this? Yeah, coo,
I'm just showing.
Speaker 1: Then the establishment said, Okay, even with the goons in
his administration, he's still too much of a of a wrecking,
too much of a loose cannon. So we roll out
the big psyops. We get QAnon, we get which is ridiculous.
I said day one, it was ridiculous. Not that the
all things they were talking about when day one were ridiculous,
but the idea of this being this white hat is
just so stupid. Okay, and if you fell for it,
I'm sorry, but I was right all along, and you
fell for it. So there was that Russia gate. Trump
is a Russian agent.
Speaker 8: How do we know?
Speaker 1: Well, because Russia hacked the DNC, they hacked the election.
Well what's the proof of this, oh little boomer ads
based out of Macedonia. What boomer ads on Facebook swung
the election to Trump? This is crazy stuff. But boomers
and the Kabbala Harris Gollum crowd type people, right, the
Hillary crowd. I'm with her. Everybody jumps on board. Oh yeah,
absolutely totally. Yes, Zuckerberg failed to put the clamp down
on this Cambridge Analytics blah blah blah blah blah, this
gibberish and it was all completely ridiculous, completely made up.
Tiny one inch, not even an inch like like Boomers
saw this, and it swung the election. It's just so stupid,
but the Left believe this. Then we get pegay, Oh yes,
you see, because Trump was at a hotel one time
and the Russians got the dirt on him, and it
didn't even make any sense, like what policies was Trump
doing that was that were aiding and making Russia the victor.
It was just a none of it even had to
make sense. And then it turns out, oh, it's actually
coming out of British intelligence Steele dossier, Christopher Steele, all
these former British intelligence operators who have been saying it
turns out we later learn during this time, working in
their think tanks, in their Integrity Initiative, leaks and so forth,
to do whatever is necessary to ensure that there's not
a second trunk. Adn't that all came out and everybody
fished through the information and found this. Then they found
out that the same superstructure, bureaucracy structure, was trying to
compromise Papadopolis, buy off, compromise sex operators, you name it,
Carter Page, all that stuff. Oh h, Roger Stone's working
with assunge with Russia and.
Speaker 8: All of that failed.
Speaker 1: But they had enough fake stream media pumping all of
this out non stop that people just assumed that, well,
there must be something there, because if there's all this smoke,
there's got to be fire, even though all of this
is just completely based on something completely fabricated by former
British intelligence, which essentially means that Hillary and the CIA
said to the former British intelligence and the think tanks
and so forth, we need this concoct this to ensure
that the real superstructure continues forward and we don't have
to deal with this goofball Trump.
Speaker 13: Right.
Speaker 1: That does not mean that Trump does not have alliances
with other factions of the power structure. Obviously he does.
It doesn't take a genius to figure that out. The
other thing, of course, is that this is really unfortunately
unavoidable in politics. There's no way anyone will be in
the presidency at all without support from Sheldon Addlson. These
kinds of characters. Now this doesn't seem necessary though. If
we look at the Trump money claims. Remember Trump claiming.
Speaker 8: I don't need the money. I'm a billionaire, I've got
my own money. I don't need them money.
Speaker 1: Well that was the twenty sixteen rhetoric.
Speaker 8: Where's that rhetoric?
Speaker 10: Right?
Speaker 1: So again, I think that if we were to really
look at weaknesses here, perhaps the weakness is money. If
I were to give an assessment, again, I'm not in politics,
so I don't know the mash how all this works
or whatever. But if I were to give my biggest
criticism of Trump, I would say, it sounds like the
weakness is that you wanted to run on this idea
that I'm not party to Washington's dirty politics because I
can't be bought. But then you end up relying on
money from entities that are pretty nefarious and can control
and pretty much control the right wing, that don't allow
anything to really get done. That's so that doesn't make sense,
you see it. That would be my biggest criticism. Obviously,
the next biggest criticism would be fast speed. If you
know what I mean, and choosing the worst possible people
for the administration. So, uh, what can we expect if
there's a Trump victory. Probably not much difference in terms
of the next four years, except that the we will
see in the immediate a giant leap in Bitcoin, a
giant leap in the crypto, the rest of the cryptos,
and in the stock market. So if you're position well economically,
if you're if you've got your bag set right now,
and if Trump wins tomorrow, you're gonna wake up a
lot richer tomorrow and it will probably kick off the
crypto bull run that everyone's waiting on for this cycle.
Because although we have seen bitcoin do well this year
again we're very close to a new all time high,
nobody people aren't really paying attention to this. The crypto
markets are kind of quiet, they've been kind of quiet,
and people aren't talking about this on a mass scale.
If Trump wins, there will be popping off Bitcoin, I expect,
and everybody will be piling back into what's what's bitcoin?
Where's coin?
Speaker 8: How do I get coin based app? Where do I
get this? Blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: That's my guess. Probably the stocks are going to go up.
Micro strategy probably keep going up. But the real issue is, yes,
you can write in yakub. So a lot of people
are asking me, I don't want to vote for Trump
or Kamala. What's the answer. There's only one answer, and
it's the answer that shines forth from our creator, as
white people. It is yakub. Yakub created us, Yakoob can
save this. So yes, if you don't want to vote
for Trump or Kamala, you do have the option to
write in yakub. As you can see now other things
that came to mind that I thought were funny. Was
surprising to see Elon sharing this. I don't know what
to make of this. I'm just surprised to see him
share this now, this again Ricole's twenty sixteen era discussions.
Speaker 8: I do not believe all of what.
Speaker 1: Was said about this at the time is fake. I
do believe there's some truth in this event. I do
believe they were able to come in and beloviate and
bring in a bunch of fake stuff to dispel and
removed discussion of this topic. So it's pretty wild. Yes,
to see within a day Elon shared this with thirty
million views. That's pretty wild. That's that's a that's a
net positive to see that being discussed. I did comment
my this comment went viral. Everyone's up in arms about
Peanut the squirrel. Where's the outrage over the abration in
the last year? What a million in a year and
the three hundred and twenty five k smuggled trafficked people. Now,
people's somebody said, where's your proof of the believe it
or not? Parker Lewis to the rescue. Parker Lewis went
and got the actual data from the media and government
websites about that very thing. So shout out to Parker
Lewis right there for replying to that idiot in the
comments acting as if it was all made up. This
I did just antrol people. I thought it was kind
of funny. Who do you think went to Hell? Peanut,
Harambe or Cecil. People didn't remember Cecil the Lion. Where
you guys been at? This is like meme history. You
remember Cecil, Cecil's right right before Harambe. Right. In fact,
Harambe stole the limelight from Cecil and then came Peanut.
And it seems like most people think they all went
to hell, which is crazy because you see so many
memes of them in heaven. Anyway, where's the where's the
Kamala dude? I want to that's what I'm looking I'm
living with that Kamala dude. I thought that was funny.
This guy, okay, this guy who has his own podcast.
It's hard to understand these people. I just said to
him that you're pretty much the perfectly conditioned double think
theta clear. That's really the one thing I can think of,
because if you read his comment, it's kind of next level.
Speaker 11: Right.
Speaker 1: My name is Ryan, I'm forty two, your old husband, father, veteran.
I voted for Kamanka Monk and Tim Walls to protect
my daughter's right to choose. Wow, think about that. But
so in other words, in order to protect my lineage,
it must be destroyed. It's literally the double think that
we're dealing with these people. I don't think I've seen
a better example of this from a single tweet person
in a long time. I hope everybody can see this.
It's almost like leftism and atheism, and it's almost like
it makes you stupid. Have you noticed that I'm not
equating theism necessarily with IQ, but there is something to
the fact that the fool says in his heart, there's
no God, because these people always end up being fools.
You become foolish. Isn't that interesting? We can all recognize,
I think over here on our side, the contradiction in this,
the obvious contradiction in this. Yes, perfectly conditioned and orwill
it's called what was it called like a a good think?
Speaker 9: Right?
Speaker 1: This guy is perfectly conditioned to good think. And good
think is when you are so perfectly conditioned that it
just comes natural to you to repeat the party line.
There's never one inkling of critical thought about the party line.
It's just repeat the party line. I thought that was
exemplary there. Now let's get back to the discussion of
the bureaucracy, the real control structure, and what we realistically
can and can't expect from a trunk a dunk, or
what we'll expect from a Kabbala Harris victory arrest.
Speaker 15: That breakdown, Now, why is that? The reason for that
is because in order to do so, you would need
to fundamentally overhaul and reorganize the government itself, and that
would require a kind of revolutionary party apparatus, a separatist
reform movement that would restaff reorganize, and completely overhaul the government.
Speaker 9: As its structured today.
Speaker 15: Needless to say, neither candidate is proposing such a thing
and there's no promise of such a development in the
near future, which brings us to the third reason why
the presidential election doesn't much matter, and that is a
convergence of crises. Specifically, let's talk about the fiscal crisis. Well,
we know that roughly speaking, every hundred days, the federal
government is adding about a trillion dollars to the national debt.
Speaker 16: Nearly thirty three trillion dollars. That's what the US national
debt was as of early September twenty twenty three. At
the end of July twenty twenty three, when the debt
was about three hundred billion dollars less, roughly seven trillion
of that was intragovernmental debt holdings, meaning the government owes
itself that money. The majority of the debt, about twenty
five point seven trillion, was held by the public.
Speaker 15: Now, in recent years, the national debt has become irrelevant.
It's ignored, nobody seems to care.
Speaker 9: But now it matters, and it matters not.
Speaker 15: Simply because the government is old and decrepit and not
properly administering a lot of these programs. But because interest
rates are rising, in order.
Speaker 17: To find enough demand for the ongoing onslaught of issuance,
we're going to have to find that appropriate yield that
garners added interest by investors. Where will that yield be,
I can't tell you, but as you look at a
chart of ten year rates going back to the early
nineteen sixties, going from five percent to fifteen percent can
happen pretty quickly.
Speaker 15: The interest rates themselves reflect confidence in the US government,
and that confidence is waning, not simply from foreigners that
buy our debt, but also from domestic institutions like pension
funds that are increasingly skeptical that the US government.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and this is the locus of the problem, the
entrenched monetary disaster black hole known as the Federal Reserve,
and the money printing machine that is in everybody's face
literally destroying the purchasing power of your money and destroying
the dollar, destroying the country. The only way out of this,
as you guys know, in my view, is bitcoin. Gold
is not the solution. Gold could be a solution if
the dollar were to go back on some kind of
hard currency like the dollar. It would certainly be way
better than what we have, but that doesn't seem likely.
And we had, of course these whisperings in the last
several months via the Bitcoin conference and other situations of
putting the dollar on a bitcoin standard, or investing some
of the US reserves or something a bitcoin or whatever
the whisperings were. That's not enough to fix this problem.
This is an entrenched black hole, Champagne supernova of debt
that can't be fixed by a president taking one percent
of bitcoin and putting it into reserves. That's not enough
to to stop this insanity. That's the real locus of
power for the system. Is that right there? That is
the the the the mother entity, right, think about alien
remembering aliens. When Ripley goes into the mother's hive and
you see the mama aliens over there, like pumping out
all of these little face huggers. There's a bunch of
face huggers like the you know, FBI, the CIA, and
blah blah blah, all these entities out there. Uh, the
mother is this this Feller reserve system. That's the central
core power of the elite, the legacy elite, system. There
is no other option. And unfortunately they have a large
share in gold. They do not have controlling interest a
bigcore because it's decentralized.
Speaker 8: And even if.
Speaker 1: Blackrock and micro Strategy both between them end up owning
one percent or five percent of Bitcoin, they can't affect
or destroy the network.
Speaker 8: So it's still whatever flaw you.
Speaker 1: Find in bitcoin, Well, then about a little mowin and
this and that and none of that. Look tomorrow, if
Trump wins, what looks like you're all gonna wake up
a lot richer, and you're all gonna wish you have bitcoin,
and you're gonna be mad at me because your butt
hurt because you thought you were smart. We could get
that dire show, that dire big click a zero, and
then tomorrow it's not gonna be zero. Even if Kamala wins,
not gonna matter. Bitcoin will outlive Kamala and Trump. And
if you would like to support me I via bitcoin,
you can do so right Here is my QR code
for my wallet. You can support me in any amount.
I appreciate that.
Speaker 8: If you want to send bitcoin there you can. If
you'd like to get started with.
Speaker 1: Bitcoin, I recommend avoiding the large exchanges at this time,
it looks like the best option for just my bitcoin
is swine bitcoin. You can get started with swan right there.
I'm not a registered financial advisor, but we have a beautiful,
fast boy not slow boy, fast boy audience over here,
and our audience is able to figure these things out
and figure out what's the smart option here? And look
what don't we just tell you guys right micro strategy,
You're going to bild a forty two billion dollar bitcoin
bank next year. That's only going to impact this price.
Microsoft is voting on including bitcoin on their balance sheet.
Do you understand this? Listen, slow people. We are past
the phase of this being weird nerd internet money and
cartel laundering money. We are at the stage now, since
this year January institutional adoption and acceptance. Major corporations now
switching to this. Microsoft even their boomer board told their shareholders,
we advise against it, but because you want it, we
have to let you vote on bitcoin being on the
Microsoft balance sheet. Hey, dummies, do you understand it's not
conspiracy money anymore?
Speaker 8: We're at that phase. This is the shift.
Speaker 1: When the monetary policy of the world is potentially changing.
Speaker 8: It will be this.
Speaker 1: Michael Saylor is evangelizing the corporations.
Speaker 8: Even the slow motion.
Speaker 1: Boomers are beginning to figure this out and rudgingly having
to admit, although probably privately, like Jamie Diamond and others,
they've been buying it for a long time and telling
their idiots that it's going to zero. When it hits
one hundred k, will you idiots in the chat still
be telling me it's going to zero?
Speaker 8: I can't.
Speaker 1: Like the people who are this slow and this out
to lunch about what's going on in the world. Will
you still be telling me it's going to zero? When
bitcoin hits one million, and it will, mark my words,
bitcoin will hit one million dollars. I don't know when,
probably we're almost at one hundred. I would say in
the next five to ten, will hit a million. Will
you still be telling me it's going to zero?
Speaker 6: To zero.
Speaker 13: And back?
Speaker 15: The Second Crisis is a domestic economic and financial crisis. Well,
as most of you know, in the United States today,
the economy is simply not as productive as it once was.
In fact, most of what's driving the economy today is
government spending, which, as I said, is both inefficient and unaffordable.
But the general population, the middle class is being battered
by structural unemployment because since COVID, major small business investment
and dynamism has completely dried up.
Speaker 9: It's died.
Speaker 15: And of course we're dealing with the legacy of an
industrial economy that has teetered, that has withered on the
vine since the nineteen eighties as the United States has
de industrialized. On top of that, we've got inflation, which
is causing a cost of living crisis as we speak.
The cost of groceries of energy are rising while Americans
are struggling to find jobs.
Speaker 9: So that's a domestic economic crisis that's.
Speaker 15: Only going to get worse and start to manifest in
a banking crisis or other financial institutions that blow up as.
Speaker 9: The underlying strength of the economy begins to seize up.
Speaker 15: The third crisis, and perhaps the most serious at this stage,
is the prospect of very serious.
Speaker 9: War with geopolitical right.
Speaker 15: This is manifest in tension between the United States and
Russia in Ukraine, or between the United States and its
ally Israel against Iran in the Middle East, or tensions
between the US and China in East Asia. Tensions are rising,
and as I said, because the President of the United
States cannot get control of the triad because he cannot
arrest the war mongering of the military industrial complex. The
likelihood that the next president can de escalate these conflicts
is un likely. So if you add it all up,
the lack of control over the US government, the inability
to arrest, the breakdown of an aging structure that's almost
one hundred years old, depending on where you want to
start the clock, and the emergent crises that are beginning
to overwhelm the US government all suggests that the next
president will fail.
Speaker 9: Stay tuned for more.
Speaker 1: Now does that mean we have to be miserable and blackpilled. No,
we got to think reality wise, best possible scenarios, what
the pros are, and not be overly optimistic and diluted
and then get let down when things perhaps get worse.
So what are the best things that we can hope for?
Should Trump win tomorrow? The best things that we can
hope for are am I you? The economy begins to
show a bit of a return again, stocks a bitcoin.
Speaker 8: Pop off.
Speaker 1: Trump's able perhaps to stave off globalization in the sense
of jobs going overseas, which he attempted to do the
last time around. There seemed to be some of that.
Perhaps we do open up some drilling here, reducing our
dependence on foreign oil, which is not even necessary. A
lot of the fake environmental regulations are there to actually
prop that up. That's all the Kissinger era stuff. So
the positives are a lot of the Boomer era horrible
worst technocrats have passed away. Kissinger's gone, Brazinski's gone, Rockefeller's gone.
They were beginning to see the transference of the handing,
of the passing on of the torch to the gen
X people. Boomers are passing away. They're some of the
worst in the history of the world world in terms
of leadership and squandering and just horrible ethics. You know
my feelings on that. I don't mean every single Boomer,
but overall as a generation, they're a massive failure. And
there's many reasons for that. We've talked about that at nauseum.
So even though Trump is Boomer, there are at least
enough gen X sentiments and the gen X apathy perhaps
to where there's some bright signs in gen X leadership
to be not as degenerate and not as horrible as
the Boomer era leadership that we had. So I think
maybe we can begin to see maybe more types of
Elon Musks, in the sense of the good parts of Musk.
I'm so tired of people asking me what do you
think about Elon Musk? And I've answered this question a
million times and it's pretty much always the same answers
that I've given about any major figure, whether it's Putin,
whether it's Trump, or whether it's Mosque. There are no heroes,
there are no perfect people, there are no angels. When
they do something good, it's good, and when they do
something bad, it's bad. So that's really all we can say.
So please don't ask me the low iq normy question, Well.
Speaker 8: Do you think about Elon Musk? Is he gonna save us?
Well you think about Donald Trump? Is he gonna save us?
Speaker 1: Nobody's gonna save you.
Speaker 8: Nobody.
Speaker 1: None of these say people are going to save you
because they're not up against a person. They're up against
an entrenched legacy, bureaucracy system, a guarantocracy, which is in
many ways dying. So that's the positives. Remember, then, let's
think about our positive Let's think about prose. We're talking
right now the prose of Trump. Pros are we can
still hopefully keep hammering away in the info war sphere.
We can keep talking about the problems of the legacy
control system, which is still very entrenched and still very powerful.
That's a positive. We keep chipping away, We keep hammering
away as best we can, trying to change minds and hearts,
right because we can still if we get another four
years of positive stuff Trump wise, we can still chip
away and still hammer away, even though there's going to
be immense opposition. But the good part about that is
everyone will again continue to see an entrenched, evil establishment
throwing everything they can at Trump, and even if Trump
is not ideal in other ways, that will still hopefully
continue to wake people up. But if everyone places all
their eggs in the Trump basket and thinks that Trump's
going to fix everything, You're just going to be let down.
I tell you that for sure. So positives again, economic positives.
Probably in the short term, maybe a scaling back of
these ridiculous foreign wars and conflicts. Maybe Trump seemed to
have some finesse and out of the remember when he
art of the deal a lot of stuff back in
twenty sixteen to twenty twenty, So perhaps we can scale
back some of that that will be a positive. Perhaps
some jobs will be a positive. There's not really anything
that Trump can do though with the ridiculous money printing
Federal Reserve stuff. I mean, he can continue to vocalize
and continue to talk about it, but this system is
destined for destruction. It will eventually employ. There will eventually be,
as Cameron says, some form of massive economic collapse. You
can't have this level of that, this level of money
printing that they're doing, destroying the purchasing power of the
dollar and it not come home to roosts. And everybody
in the last year especially has seen it come home
to roost. Eggs are like three to five times what
they used to be only a few years ago. Everyone's
groceries are doubled and tripled. Going out to eat is
like one hundred and fifty bucks for a couple of people.
When it used to be I mean, dude, even the nineties,
I remember taking it. If I took a date out
in the nineties, it was like thirty to forty bucks.
And now it's like one hundred to hundred and fifty bucks.
That's crazy.
Speaker 8: That's like a five x.
Speaker 1: What are eggs?
Speaker 13: So?
Speaker 1: Anyway, more positives, more positive of Trump. I'm not sure
I can think of many more positives. Can you guys
think of many more positives? We will get, Okay, crypto
pro bitcoin, pro crypto, that'll be a positive with Trump.
Can you think of anything else? I'm trying to think
of what the other positives might be if Kamala gets elected.
What are we gonna think? Let's let's talk about cons
of Trump. Cons of Trump are going to be that
the system is going to throw everything again, and so
we're gonna have a repeat of twenty sixteen to twenty twenty.
So we're gonna have whatever the next Russia Gate three
point zero crisis is, We're gonna have fake flagged stuff
by the establishment going popping off. We may have that
either way. Right, I'm aware of the weakness the flaws
of Trump's pro life positions. I think this is a mistake,
but he's got these. Essentially, Basically, we have a democrat
from the nineties is what we've got. So I don't
know what to make of that.
Speaker 13: Now.
Speaker 1: There's some of that is good, because even the nineties
the so called conservatives were garbage. But I'm still trying
to think of what might be positives that are positive negatives?
Can you guys, what do you guys think in the chat?
If you want to send me a super chat about
what you think our positives are negatives?
Speaker 3: Let me know.
Speaker 1: Uh Nectario says for five dollars, Emperor Donald Trump will win.
That's so we got uh people calling it. Let's see
if I can do.
Speaker 8: Let's do a poll and.
Speaker 1: I want you guys to give me what you guys
think in your opinion? Will it be Trump or Cabbala?
And let's start a poll for the chat. I don't
think I've ever done a poll, So you guys vote
there if you can. Did you guys see that is
that showing up, whether you think it's Trump or Cabbala.
This is sorry our native jason alysis poll here to see,
pretty heavy, heavily one sided. I think we can assume.
Speaker 8: But also let me know what you think the pros
are cons going to be if we get a Trump presidency.
What are the pros?
Speaker 1: I think this compromise on you know, pro life to
try to bring in TULSEI and RFK. I just I
think that's a mistake. I think we could have gotten
their endorsements without that. I mean, maybe that's not why
he did it. Maybe he really, I mean, but I
mean Milania has pro choice views, so this is another
factor here. This is a huge mistake.
Speaker 8: Will we actually see.
Speaker 1: Border action I hope, right. I mean, we got a
lot of talk about this in the first time around,
then we got some sort of pseudo wall that kind
of was built but then paused. So again, maybe this
falls back into the domain of can the president actually
build a wall? You know what I mean? Like, not
does he have the legal authority or whatever, but does
he have the power against the entrench bureaucracy to actually
do that. That's that's the question, right.
Speaker 8: Another downside is, you know, the Trump thing.
Speaker 1: I think the biggest positive that we could say is
is orthodox Is he who's better for Orthodoxy? Well, certainly
not Kamala.
Speaker 8: And the only the best thing I could say about
Trump is well, he at least doesn't hate our country.
Speaker 1: So we've got somebody horrible for Orthodoxy, actually demonic policies,
who you know, hates the country, versus someone who at
least doesn't hate the country. I wish he loved our
country as much as Middle Eastern countries. That might be nice.
And who's the best for Orthodoxrisianity. Well, right, that's what
the Saints say, essentially, right, choose on that basis.
Speaker 8: Vain five dollars. It afternoon, brother, I just voted in
a state that is very much read, but I voted anyway.
Speaker 1: Christ has risen. Thank you appreciate that. Vane DC would
working three dollars. Thank you guys so much for that support. Anonymous,
ten dollars. Listen, you can vote for Yakoub, but I'm
gonna write in Jay Dyer and then a phronsie a
wine mom as VP also another option. However, it is
the we are on the misogynist party. So you know
a lot of people have issues with the misogyny Party
were we are a red Our colors are red because
we're red in the face from all the phronsia that
we drink. So we have that, we have that hobo
disease where your face gets red from drinking too much,
and so our party colors are red. That symbolizes the
red phronsia. Our music is sung by Redman Rapper and
you can you can write me in but all so
maybe you want to write yet, Coubin Matthew five dollars.
Is Trump actually going to make the us better. Well,
this is what we're trying to determine today. So I
think that in certain ways we'll see positives if Trump,
if Trump wins.
Speaker 8: But I think that.
Speaker 1: This is why when you grow out of your you know,
normy politics ferber, which many of us have in our twenties,
you know, like I said, going back to the Ron
Paul era in the two thousands, when I was in
my twenties and being, you know, really into that type
of politics and whatever. I think, when you grow out
of it, you kind of understand that the country is
run by what we're talking about here, and it's not
run by the president, it's not run by the public branches.
It's run by this And until we can get people
to the point where they recognize that nothing changes. And
all of you out there who listen to people you're
listening to your Matt Walsh's or whoever, they don't talk
about this all right, this is not what you're allowed
to talk about. And until we can get enough of
the normies and the dumb dums to understand this, stuff's
not gonna change because people are gonna think that it's
all being determined and decided at the level of.
Speaker 8: The President and the wallmakers, well, wallmakers in Washingtom, the
wall makers in washing them as if it's not these
entities that are the real power players. Now, why can't
someone like a Matt Walsh who's intelligent or a Knowles
or why can't they talk about this stuff?
Speaker 1: Well, it might be because of their contracts, and it
might be because they legitimately are ignorant and they think
that the boobs in Washington control everything. Now, we got
to get past the boobs in Washington. It's what Cameron
is talking about. It's what I always talk about, the
real power structure, the entrenched bureaucracy, the NGOs, the foundations
that think tanks, the Federal Reserve, the private banks of
the federal That's who really controls things, the fortune one hundred.
Speaker 8: It's not the sex compromised senator from.
Speaker 1: Washington that runs shit. Okay, Yeah, until we can get
past kan Inc, nothing will change. And until we can
understand foreign government's control. Right, what do I think about
Tony Hinchcliffe? It's just I think it's nothing. It's literally
a standard comedian fair that the Democrats have latched onto
because their only policy is Trump is Heaitler? That's it?
Speaker 8: So anything that they can find to try to play
on that.
Speaker 1: That's all they have. Like I said, it's wild if
you've watched politics since the nineties to see people really
running on nothing except Abrosh and Trump Heitler, that's pretty wild.
I'll put the video in the chat for you guys.
Our friend Kevin McGregor Cameron is Colonel Douglas McGregor's son,
so you can watch his video. Thank you, guys for
the support. Now, it looks like in our poll, no
shocker there. We had a pretty unanimous Trump at eighty
four percent, Kabala Harris at fifteen percent. Not surprising. That's
pretty much what I expected that this audience would would project.
But really was what I was hoping was that you
guys would vote a vote on what you thought would
what happen, not voting on who you liked. Obviously, no
wady in this audience would like the wine Mom candidacy,
but who you thought would win. Let's see, Trump seems
like another controlled op. He's thereby banks, he pretends to
hate banks. I feel like things are rigged again. I know, man,
don't you think I've heard all this a million times?
So we're trying to analyze things at at a realistic level,
or what we can actually expect. Lynn Water five dollars, Jay,
I love what you've been doing in your videos lately.
Can we get a quick Donald talking to Richard Dawkins. Well,
for a five dollars impression, you'll get.
Speaker 14: Richard jerkis you wonderful guy?
Speaker 8: Really crazy guy?
Speaker 14: He kind of looks like a turtle if you.
Speaker 8: Look at Do you think he looked a turtle?
Speaker 6: I think he does.
Speaker 14: Really, He's just gotta got a turtle fascial face. She
like a lugg. He's gonna leg, He's gonna tip over
like a fascil.
Speaker 1: Donald.
Speaker 2: I think you're actually quite evil if I was to
say so myself, although I don't have any standard for
what evil is because everything's evolving.
Speaker 1: How's that CHARGI ten dollars? What are your thoughts on
people like quintest Rittenhouse others not voting for Trump because
of this establishment and they don't agree one hundred percent?
Seems like pissing in the wind or just falling out
a sword for virtue. I don't really ultimately think it's
a huge deal whether or not people vote or not.
But you know, in the Orthodox view, again, I think that,
like FDA said, if you do choose to vote, then
you need to vote for who is the best for orthodoxy.
That's it, Detective twenty seven ten dollars. It'll be God's
judgment on the country. If cup wins, you know what,
I think, it'll be Gaud's judgment. No matter what right
I mean, it is possible for us to have a
national repentance and all this kind of stuff. I'm not
sure that we're gonna get that anytime soon. But again
here's my thought. I think think about don't think about
some person fixing things in the next four years. I'll
start thinking long term about what are the forms that
we want to see and stantiated down the road. So,
like Cameron said, there would have to ultimately be some
future overhaul that I don't know how that would occur,
Constitutional convention, future president. I have no idea. Some sort
of overhaul of the bureaucracy would have to happen to
see real change. Perhaps, best case scenario, the discussions that
Trump initiates could be the beginning forms of that ten
twenty years down the road. That's possible. That's our best
case scenario. It's not gonna have any time soon. Perhaps
what we're discussing nowadays is the seed form for the
better forms that we want to see brought about in
ten twenty thirty years. That's our best case scenario, That's
what I'm saying. In maybe ten twenty thirty years down
the road that leads to lawful means and methods by
which we re establish things. Does that make sense? That's
our best case scenario now. To get to that, though,
might entail. I'm not advocating this. I don't believe in
accelerationism or anything like that. I think that's evil. We're
not allowed to advocate for accelerationism as orthodox. But perhaps
maybe four years from now, let's take Abala wins. Four
years from now, we get a massive economic collapse. Let's
say she initiates her worst all of her horrible policies,
and the economy collapses. Everybody tied to the dollar, which
is pretty much everybody unless you're really into golden bitcoin,
will not do well in that scenario. Then out of
this we begin to have discussions of real issues and reform.
Perhaps because things are bad, true patriots too true, conservatives
true right. When people continue the discussion of the fed
usury the dollar. All of that, there's enough of an
awareness that we begin to discuss new forms. Perhaps the
country collapses and new forms are established right in the
next five to ten years. Perhaps the global elite, because
of being a legacy system and they push so hard
with all of their agenda and the you know, gender
agenda and all of it, maybe they go full board
and try to have a war, and maybe that leads
to the collapse and the re establishing of a new form.
I think Cameron's correct though, that we can't expect this
legacy system to work and to be their long term
I suspect that the global elite technocrat establishment, just like
what I'm saying, does not expect the legacy system to continue.
How they intend to collapse and dispel the system, I
am not sure. I don't know whether they want to
do a cloud and Piven economic type of collapse, whether
they want to continue the gradualism to move into the
new form. But we know that they have a new
form that they have established in all the globally texts.
We've lectured through it many times. They want a completely centralized, technocratic,
top down, one hundred percent track trace controlled, fifteen minutes
super Dystopian city model. That's what they want. That's their
future form that we know they want to bring in,
and they may bring that in. I don't think it'll
be long term successful.
Speaker 8: But that's what they want. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying that Kabbala Harris will bring that. No,
we're talking ten twenty thirty years down the road. That's
the plan we are approaching. The twenty thirty goals though,
so twenty thirty will be huge for the global elite
power structure. We know they have many stated goals for
what they want by twenty thirty, and probably many of
those goals are behind. So perhaps twenty thirty to twenty
forty in a lot of their timelines, that's a key
point to roll out the technocracy, to roll out the
total control economically, everything horrible in the Dystopian novels is
what we're talking about. Twenty thirty to twenty forty. Okay,
that's what they want.
Speaker 13: Now.
Speaker 1: Again, we don't know that they'll get that, but that's
their form, that's the future form they want to use.
The gen z Speak manifest We also, though on our side,
have perhaps future forms that we need to be talking
about and I'm talking about, you know, some form of
traditional conservative religious based I don't know about Christian nationalism
or maybe Byzantine model something like that is what we
need to begin to discuss because the legacy system is
going away how fast, we don't know, how drastic. We
don't know. But the old federal reserve model, the old
legacy media model of boomer satellite, cable.
Speaker 8: TV, FM, radio, you know, the dollar, like all that.
Speaker 1: Boomer shit is going away. That's the legacy model that
is going away. We don't know how fast and how drastic.
But we need to begin to think beyond Trump. Okay,
because best case scenarios of Trump years and a bit
of a staving off of the bad stuff, But we've
got to be realistic that until the bureaucracy is gone
into until the Federal Reserve and all this military industrial complex,
which is the positive the good side is that that
is part of the legacy system. Right until that's gone,
we're not going to have substantial on the ground change
in this country.
Speaker 8: Can we get a new positive form without that stuff collapsing?
Speaker 1: I don't know. That's a tough question because we know
again that the elite power structure, which is tied to
the legacy system also knows that it's a legacy system.
So let's not be naive here and think that, you know,
like Matt Walsh or something, that the Democrat there a
bunch of dummies and there are buff fins. No, there's
a layer of social engineer technocrats above them that are
really running things, and they're not dumb, and they have
a layer of dumb to protect them. The politicians, we
know that they know that the legacy system is going
to die, and we know the form they want to bring,
the international global technocratic order, the Claus Schwab model of
fourth and Nose revolution. So how are they going to
get that? That's the question. I don't think Trump is
I think they see Trump as an annoyance, but they're
not worried long term because they know that, as we said,
as long as this bureaucracy is there, this snake will
shed its skin to create the new snake. You see.
Speaker 8: Stuff on DV ten dollars. Trump had an Orthodox priest
at the start of his rally.
Speaker 1: That's huge.
Speaker 8: That is good.
Speaker 1: That's a good sign. Number two, maybe we'll not have
World War three, so that's a good thing. Yes, So
we're talking about the positives of Trump here. I am
a little concerned about this broad tent stuff, right with, Oh,
let's have the Sikhs praying and let's have the Hindus
praying at the you know, at the GOP, and like
that's this acumenist stuff. The GOP is not a good sign.
I understand the political expediency argument. I know, I know
all that. But you go on to say Trump says
Christians won't never need to vote again. I don't know
what that means. I heard him say that. Maybe he
just misspoke. I don't know what that's supposed to mean.
For Trump is bad for international business, but I heard
it was a huge issue in twenty sixteen. I'm not sure.
Maybe you mean global corporations are not happy with trum
Anonymous three dollars Jay, I'm twenty three. I've been seeking
out are in the Army, Navy, Special Forces. I'm very conflicted.
I'm aware of these topics and are fake society? Can
I do this in good faith and be orthodox? What
are your thoughts? I mean, I'm not gonna tell you
what to do with your life.
Speaker 15: I just know that.
Speaker 1: I mean, there were times in my youth when I
thought about and considered military stuff and all that, I
would never fight for the things that this country stands
for now. So you got to make that decision with
your own conscience. But I would not anonymous one dollar.
Harris says, quote, I don't.
Speaker 8: Need poles that chest my intuition, Joe.
Speaker 1: That tells you all that you need to know. She
knows that entities have her back. Nothing substantial has changed
since twenty to fix certain rigging. Kabbala sympathizer five dollars.
A con for Trump is his record on labor unions.
Speaker 8: Well, the problem with the labor.
Speaker 1: Unions is that I don't think nowadays labor unions are
really what they were originally intended to be. I think
they were kind of a long time ago, co opted
by particularly Rockefellers, and then by you know, organized crime.
I don't keep up with what labor unions are up
to today, but I assume that it's still probably corrupt.
But I don't know ser from ly a one dollar.
It's a misconception to think that every foreign person wants
Trump to win. Bagel wants someone who is easy to control.
Trump is not easy to control. Someone who got their
big break by giving sexual favors might be easy to control. Well,
I would agree that if you're sexually compromised, absolutely ELI
at two dollars. The Agenda twenty twenty five would enable
Trump to actually do stuff about Project twenty twenty five.
We're talking about like the un age into twenty twenty five.
I'm not sure which which thing you mean. You're talking
about Project twenty twenty five. The media hates Project twenty
twenty five. Yeah, I'm aware of that.
Speaker 8: Trump has distanced himself, but perhaps he will actually enact it.
Speaker 1: I don't. I just I don't know if I would.
I don't have much hope in any of that kind
of stuff. Maybe lick keV one dollar thirty cents JAM
for the UK, we have a new PM. They're a
super liberal global elite socialist. Do you think Trump can
sort him out? I don't know what you mean by
sort him out. Trump's campaign sued my governing party for
election interference. Christ has Risen indeed as well. I mean, yeah,
it's funny, and we talked about election interference. What about
British intelligence election interference? Because they admittedly said they didn't
want Trump and steal dossier as like you know, British
intel stuff jmail thirty dollars. The pro of Trump could
be that the campaign to schedule all schedule f all
government employees MUSK would help with that restructuring. I wonder
if that really wouldn't mean these bureaucracies. I mean, I
know they've mentioned this. I remember when Elon was talking
about that. I mean, I hope so best case scenario maybe, uh,
could they really do that? I mean, what do you
guys think? Is this realistic? Is Jay not aware of
the Willy Brown situation? I mean, I've heard of Willy Brown.
Speaker 13: What is this?
Speaker 1: I don't know about now. I guess I'm not. I
don't really follow a lot of like politics drama, so
unless it relates to geopolitics, you know, like Steele dossier.
Like I went deep dive on all that stuff, deep
dive into Integrity Initiative and all that script all that
kind of stuff. But I don't know what's the Willie
Brown BJ incident. This sounds pretty gross. Trump said it
Christians wouldn't need to vote because he thinks Christians don't vote,
so he says they wouldn't need to anymore. I still
don't understand what that means.
Speaker 8: Virella.
Speaker 1: The second twenty dollars putin open up especial visa migration
for Westerns with conservative views to move to Russia. Yeah,
I mean this has been kind of happening actually since
twenty eighteen nineteen, in varying degrees.
Speaker 8: Should we flee the liberal imperium and go there? I mean,
I can't tell you what to do.
Speaker 1: I mean, I've had friends that have moved there, spent
time there, took his family there a year. There a
lot of difficulties in doing that. But also I guess
it depends on where you go. I don't know anything
about it, honestly, I don't know.
Speaker 13: Man.
Speaker 8: I think there's a lot of culture shock if you
try to go to some Russian village.
Speaker 1: I don't that's not for me. But I think a
lot of people too, have these kind of stupid ideas,
like they think they're going to move to some you know,
orthodox imperium. That you're not moving to that, man, you know,
But it's really a decision that will depend on a
case by case basis. So I can't tell you that
anonymous ten dollars best case scenario is Kamala wins. There's
a mass orthodox conversion. Okay, well I don't think this
is This does not seem very likely. And then there's
an economic crash that leads to a monarchy where we
get a theology and geopolitically knowledgeable Van Dam fan who
has varience and speaking to the masses. I like where
this is going. I like anonymous plan here. This is
this is anonymous project twenty twenty five, where we essentially
get a JCVD presidency, which I called for on my Twitter. Right,
we get a JCVD presidency, We get a JD Vice
presidency right about JD vance No JD Vice presidency meaning me,
We get four years of Van Dam basically cleaning house
one man machine attack program. He's you know, roundhousing you know,
Ralph Child, He's roundhousing the Rockfellers. Basically JCVD beats up everybody.
We get a year of partying like this, literally like this.
Everyone has to the nation learns this as our national dance.
We have national anthems. First time ever. Now we have
a national dance. It is the Van Dam from kickboxer.
Van Dam initiates this transition phase of America from a
secular democracy to a orthodox imperium. And then I stepped
to the four the next four years after that, that's
probably what would happen, for sure, Yes, exactly. Also, another
untapped potentiality is we get the Beaver wave right justin
beaver So everybody's expecting red wave, not red wave. What
about a purple wave? Has anybody considered a beaver wave?
Speaker 14: No?
Speaker 15: So?
Speaker 8: And why is that?
Speaker 1: Because none of you actually know what's going on, only
the elite of this. And the other possibility that no
one's talking about, which could be a black Swan event
Coney twenty twelve, Slash twenty twenty four. What if a
Joseph Coney pops back up? Everybody thought, Oh, he's gone,
it's gonna be Jeb. No, No, I'm talking crazier than Jeb.
I'm talking Coney twenty twelve. Nobody is expecting this curve
ball right here, Joseph Coney pops up, he wins the election,
Nigerian intelligence sweeps in clears house, the swamp is cleared out,
we get a favorable Coney dictatorship, a positive Cony dictatorship. Uh,
and then we transition to orthodoxy. Also a possibility that
few are considering. Only the highest iq are considering this
possibility right now guys, I want to remind you that
we do have a show sponsor. I have a lot
of time, I've had a lot of fun with you guys.
Today Jade woke up and chose silliness. Bro, do you
we already live in idiocracy? It's already Beef Supreme dude,
what are you talking about? We already live under a
Beef Supreme presidency. Another option, if you are considering, is
Project pat twenty twenty four. Right, we get the player's
ball government. What if the players ball comes in, they
clear house? Right, we get four years of scissorup? Is
anyone considering that? Also a possibility that if you are considering, guys,
you've got to be ready for these anomalies, right, because
we all remember twenty sixteen. Everybody woke up and they
were like, what we thought it was her?
Speaker 8: Sarah and Leo.
Speaker 1: I just came across this Pope makes rare house visit
to a braution advocates House can't wait for the trads
to react to that. Well, there's nothing that will change
the trial. I mean the trads are like, once the
Pope put out a funko pope for them, that he
pretty much sealed the deal of their souls forever being
in his grasp. Charshi two dollars. There's so many stupid
people in this country. Evil and misanthropic as it sounds,
perhaps a collapse in a reset is good. It is
a ninety percent deep hop. I don't think we should
think like that, right. I mean, it's not our job
to have this accelerationist mindset. That's ultimately up to divine providence.
If God decides that the world is so wicked that
that's necessary, then that's that's gonna be what happens. But
I don't think we're supposed to ever have the attitude of, oh, well,
I'm gonna partake of evil and promote evil so that
good may come. No, that's not that's not what we're
supposed to do. That's pretty pretty evil.
Speaker 8: Quantum Funko, Pope, Quantum Project Pat, Quantum Coney, Quantum van Dam.
These are also possibilities.
Speaker 1: Perhaps through retroactive quantum fomal causation, we.
Speaker 8: Cause the Project Pat presidency to come about. That's also
a possibility that you are considering. How am I racist
as hell? Nothing I'm talking about.
Speaker 1: So it's racist for me to want Project Pat to
take a Project Pat would run the country better than
freaking Kabbala. Dude, what are you talking about? I know,
I'm literally saying Project Pat would run the country way
better than Kabbala Harris. How is that racist? That's actually
not racist, that's actually pro black. And I'm being I'm
being one hundred percent serious. Every one of you goober's
in the chats knows damn well you'd rather have Project
President Pat oor president Kabala Harris. You all know that.
But I gotta remind you that we have a show
sponsor off.
Speaker 8: Something that we're all proud of, not all browser.
Speaker 1: Here, haang it. We have a show sponsor. And not
only is that show sponsor the best in supplementation to
get your butt fit, to get you swolled, to get
you straight chalk dot com. My little friend Vivek Roboswami
has a word for you.
Speaker 10: I'm going to put you on something crazy real quick.
Most of these zuomer Jimbros are consuming macro guzzling synthetic
dies and synthetic sweeteners on the daily. They don't even
know it. Goofy af, There's nothing great about that. Do
not listen any further unless you are in Alpha or
Sigma Male. This is important and there could be consequences.
There's a new certified Sigma Male pre workout powder for
Sigmas only. It is guaranteed to empower you to dominate
your co workers, fire your boss, aggressively, gamble, or invade
a small village. Chad Mode stands out from the crowd
by excluding artificial flavors, preservatives, sweeteners, and dyes. We've even
avoided so called natural flavors which are actually not natural
at all, ensuring a clean and effective formula. Experience the
pure goodness of chad Mode colored with organic blue spirolina extract,
organic lemon cherry, and organic maple crystals. Forget synthetic caffeine
made in a sketchy Chinese lab. Embrace the natural power
of organic green coffee bean extract, which will get your
mind going and pump you up to the max. Chad
Mode is made in America with all clean ingredients, the
first clean pre workout of its kind. Why are these
people adding synthetic sweeteness to every single pre workout when
there are many studied downsides to consuming nasty fake sucralose.
Each dose of chad Mode contains the kick of a
cup and a half of coffee, delivering a surge of
energy alongside essential vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and herbal extracts.
Chad Mode will allow you to fire your boss and
dominate anyone who opposes you. Chad Mode will make you
more dominant in your daily life, so proceed with caution.
It's as simple as mixing one or two scoops of
our fine powder into water or juice, providing you with
a delicious, energizing beverage featuring a burst of sweet organic
fruit flavor. Chad Mode will give you the extra edge
you desperately crave. Don't miss out. Secure your supply of
chad Mode on TikTok shop with a life.
Speaker 1: Remind you guys, head on to chot dot comhoq dot
com now. Also, we have our icon Conference coming out
this weekend November this week in Friday, what is it?
I guess Friday, So in a few days, if you're
in the Florida area, you want to come to our
Icon Conference. It's going to be a lot of fun.
We can have discussion and lectures by myself, Father Vladimir,
Father Theodore, Father Diggon and Is. We will all be
presenting on the topic of iconography. It's gonna be very deep,
it's gonna be a lot of fun. It's not expensive,
one day conference for thirty dollars, and that's not going
to me. It's going to the church. So if you
want to come check us out, come support us, be
sure and get your tickets. The links are underneath this.
It's also in the show description over here on YouTube.
You can get your tickets to the icon conference right here. No,
I'm not pushing anyone away from Chalk. Chalk is a
great sponsor. Are funny, They're intended to be funny. So
you're just wasting your time with those comments. And Chalk
is who made the ad. Dummy, They made that ad,
and we love to make funny ads. And I would
assume that people have the IQ to figure that out
that obviously the ads a joke. But well, Jonathan Pagoe
is in Canada, so Jonathan Pagioe can't come to our
Florida conference.
Speaker 14: So that is a.
Speaker 1: Idiotic comment. But my priest is studying iconography, so it's
not like, can you stop spamming the chat dude, Come on.
So my priest is a very talented artist and he's
actually studying to become an iconographer under a very prominent person,
and it's going to be a great conference. Conference. Will
get your tickets Vondier three dollars, Jay, I'm a big fan.
Do you think the rhetoric that America is a Christian
country has any merit to it? I mean, and maybe
in a nominal in a nominal sense, not in a
real sort of you know, beefy sense. Maybe in like
a vegetarian sense, but not in a bfi sense, because uh,
you know, it's really grounded on some Christian principles and
a lot of Enlightenment principles, so nominally Christian, maybe it
would be ideally moving in the direction of Christian. As
a Catholic, I struggle to buy into this with the
Masonic origins, Yeah, I mean, I think, as we've said
many times, I done a lot of talks on this,
America was always kind of in this internal struggle would
it go in the direction of its Christian principles or
its Enlightenment principles. And I think pretty obviously America has
definitely gone full sale in the direction of its Enlightenment principles.
So as time goes by, it more and more sheds
the Christian elements, and so that's why I think we
have to start thinking down the road for new forms.
Zach ten dollars. Do you have long term concerns about Elon? Honestly, no,
People get so scared and free what if he's Antichrist?
I mean again, even if I'm a Christian, I'm not
supposed to be worried about any of that. So but
now I'm not worried that. Remember when everybody was saying
Jared Kushner's did he Christ? It was so stupid. And
there's nothing more idiotic than when people try to pick
out who they think the Antichrist is. Now, I'm not
saying that you can't eventually do that, because that'll be obvious,
But I don't think the Elon is the anti Christ
Jmail twenty dollars. Is Christian nationalism a slogan of new
Apostolic Reformation. I don't know what that is. They are
approaching Theosis and think they're the Apostles. That just sounds
like a cult, So I would avoid anything to do
with that. Christian nationalism is really I mean in terms
of Byzantine imperium in the Christian model, when you have
a majority Orthodox Christian population that can begin to be
reflected in the state, and the state can then have
laws based on Christian principles. So that's that's what that's about.
And that's the normal, classic, traditional Orthodox Christian history position.
Ortho Debo three dollars. Did you know Project pat is
a pastor now? Yeah, I did see those clips. That's
pretty funny, God willing it will be father Deacon pretorious
patristic pet That's funny. Many from East Tennessee, thank you
appreciate that, Ortho Brandon three dollars. Are people the same
as they always were? Yeah? In terms of human nature, Yeah,
human nature doesn't change. What about mentally and emotionally? I
think probably in modernity, with the rise of internet and
toxic entertainment and everything else, there's probably a lot higher
rates of emotional problems and mental problems. After the Enlightenment,
human thought seems to rely heavily on continued advancements on
all fronts of humanity. Well, that was the Enlightenment idea
of perpetual progress. Yes, stories from the past, he'll speak
to us greatly today. Yeah, I think on this channel,
you know, we are heavily rooted in history. You know,
I mean I I have a history degree. It was
two classes away from a double major in philosophy and
history in my undergrad So you know, history is absolutely
lutely essential for being educated, for having wisdom, understanding the world,
not making the mistakes of the past. So we're big,
we're big on history over here. A lot of the
talks we're doing are grounded in history. So you know,
this is one of the critiques that we have of
modernity and the internet and the semblance of education, the
pseudo education that people get through the Internet, not always
but oftentimes, for example, YouTube videos alone, scrolling, that's pseudo education.
You're not actually getting educated if you're not reading the
books you can. You will never be able to replace
the education that comes from working your way through texts.
So a lot of today's people societies are that they're
they're they have a semblance of education, not real education,
because they can't work through books. Carter two dollars. Do
you think smoking cigars is based? I don't think it
matters at all. I think has Paul said right, whether
you drink or don't drink is of no account. George
Washington bar for five dollars bow down to your Nigerian overlords.
If you mean Cony twenty twelve, yes, I will about him.
Saint Bizel three dollars. If anyone believes in accelerationism, look
at Argentina in nineteen twenty. Compare it to how it
looks now and you realize it doesn't work. It just
turns your country into a Third world dump.
Speaker 8: Yeah.
Speaker 1: I think that a lot of times. I mean, really,
accelerationism is just another type of revolutionary thinking. And Mars, well,
look at Marx. You know, Marx was a was a accelerationist,
and he thought that the only way you would ever
get the awakening of the working class was through worsening
situations and pressures. So, for example, if you read at
Marxist dot org, there's classic old school essays and talks
from Marx and Ingles about why they supported open borders.
Now you might think, well, why would Marx be for
open borders. That doesn't make any sense because that's like
an economic incentive of a you know, mega capitalist neoliberal proponent.
Well Mark says that the greatest way to upset and
awaken the working class would be through open borders. That
was those marks idea. Now, He doesn't think that it's
going to help the workers. He just thinks it will
enrage them and awaken them too. Class consciousness and the revolution. Now,
all of that was idiotic, but it's kind of like
Dark Knight rises, right, this is the thinking of Bain. Right,
Bain I was born in adversity, right, Bain thinks that
if he initiates the accelerationism in Gotham City, then they'll
get this enlightened Bane order of basically a kind of
communism or whatever. And if you watch the movie, there's
actually a communist symbolism, like Killian Murphy is situated like
Robespierre up on this you know, makeshift throne when he's
like judging who lives and dies. Right, So it's actually
hinting at what I'm talking about. And one of the points.
Oddly enough, this was very odd to see this in
the Christopher Nolan Dark Knight.
Speaker 8: I don't know why.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure why to this day he wanted that
in there. But you know, I'm not saying that the
you know, an randy and monopoly elites are good people.
It is very uncommon in Hollywood, though, to see a
movie where the socialist revolution is pictured as the bad guys.
But maybe that's just because, you know, maybe maybe in
that film, Nolan is presenting like a faux pseudo rite
where oh, you know, Bain's Committee for Public Safety robespeer
Revolution ends up in everybody getting their heads cut off
into Gotham City. So actually, all along it was better
off that you'd be ruled by you know, Mega's super
technocrat Bruce Wayne. Maybe that's the point of the movie,
which again is even still it's very odd and rare
in Hollywood. And I'm not saying that that means that
I want to be under a technic, right, I'm just
saying that it's a bizarre it's not a common message.
And they're even quoting, like, you know, it shows a
grave at the end of Dark Night with with quotes
from like Taylor two Cities or something weird, which is
again is you know, Dickens talking about Prince Revolution, Saint
Basil three dollars. No, we already read that, Lucas is
five dollars. Who remembers a dollar menu, a dollar store,
now a dollar tree. I haven't eaten a McDonald's in
probably twenty years. Does the dollar menu exist or not?
I don't even know, actually older longer than I probably
I haven't eaten a McDonald's in pro since, probably like
before the Big nine event. Probably the last thing I
ever had was like an egg McMuffin in the morning,
probably in the year two thousand, that crazy twenty four
years of no macdonkah donks. And that's why you see
such a beautiful visage before you in part that in
chalk dot com dustin three dollars. Where on the political
spectrum do you fall? I mean, orthodox, traditional conservative?
Speaker 8: Morally, I really have no.
Speaker 1: I'm not involved in any political stuff really obviously, I
think Trump is the best, is the better candidate for
orthodox Christianity. What's the ideal government? A Christian of Byzantium?
How's that low pen of five dollars? You might have
even had a better Trump impression than Shane Gillis.
Speaker 8: I don't know.
Speaker 1: Maybe, I mean, I don't even know how to judge that,
because at a certain point, impressions kind of it's like
the impressions all kind of sound the same, you know
what I mean. Remember when everybody was impersonating back in
the day Christopher Walking, and then eventually everybody's Christopher Walking
and Russian sounds like a Christopher walking impression, so appreciate
that comment, though no face kill out five dollars. I've
been visiting the liturgy for a month. I came from Protestantism.
I was agnostic, but then I turned Spiritualist and now
converted to Orthodoxy. Hey, that's great to hear. Appreciate that.
I also quit weed for a month, and I was
curious about the church's position on that. I don't think
there is an official position on something that could have
medicinal effects. So I do think that there can be
a case made for the medicinal uses of THHC, etc.
I don't think there's any question about that, but I
think that in terms of other questions, you would take
that up with your spiritual father. So I don't give
people personal advice or medical advice or anything like that.
Those are kinds of just like your diet, like you
take that up with your spiritual father. DJ Paul, what
about I mean do a DJ Paul presidency would be
better than Kabbala presidency. Guys, remember you can support my
channel by super chats or heading over to chalk dot
com and use the promo code J forty Jay forty
to get forty percent off all those great products if
you want to test them out. If you want a
better discount, use the promo code Jay forty four life.
That's Jay four four l I f E. You don't
get fifteen percent off, you get forty four percent off
and you can cancel in any time. Chalk is the
best in supplementation. They're very strict about their purity standards
at Chalk, and that goes for anything, whether it's the
Tonkat one hundred proven to boost testosterone in those peer
viewed studies, or whether it's the pre workout chad Mode.
There's no synthetic, fake toxic ingredients. Everything over there is
one percent pure, and they're very precise and strict about that.
Chalk dot Com promo code Jay four four l E.
You can also head it over to Jason Analysis in
the shop and you can get signed copies of my
books es So Terry Hollywood one as Sarah Hollywood two,
The Red Book, six hundred and sixty pages of all
of my geopolitical works, my philosophical works smashed together in
one book. Or you can get Jamie's great books and
products as well, and yes, everything at the website is signed,
so you don't have to put in a note, you
don't have to request, you don't have to worry Jay,
Will it be signed.
Speaker 8: Yes.
Speaker 1: The advantage of getting the books from me is that
you do not give money to Jeff Bezos and the
books are signed. So yes, everything over here does come signed. Obviously,
the Jamie's Cream does not come signed. That's not under
the purview of autographs. And yes, be sure and get
your tickets to the conference. You're gonna have a lot
of fun. Otherwise, everybody, have a lot keep your head up,
don't worry, don't get crazy worried about this kind of stuff.
Politics comes and goes. Remember we're focused on things that
are eternal. But we can hope for the best. And
remember to stack.
Speaker 8: Your bitcoin and to hoddle and be prepared for.
Speaker 1: What may come. Otherwise, they already have a good night.