Speaker 1: Welcome to my world, bitch.
Speaker 2: Good, Happy New Year listeners, and welcome to the Supernatural
Speaker 2: Occurrence Studies podcast.
Speaker 1: So Sporadically Paranormal.
Speaker 2: My name is Jason Knight, host of the show, and
Speaker 2: with me as always.
Speaker 1: Is Oscar Spector.
Speaker 2: Producer extraordinary and podcast co host. Well, before we begin,
Speaker 2: I just want to wish all of our listeners are
Speaker 2: very happy new year. I hope twenty twenty five brings
Speaker 2: you peace and happiness, health and.
Speaker 1: Prosperity, especially on the twentieth of January.
Speaker 2: January twentieth, what's that?
Speaker 1: That's when the guy gets sworn in again?
Speaker 2: Oh my god, the guy. Yeah, I don't forget.
Speaker 1: I didn't want to much any name.
Speaker 2: Fuck him.
Speaker 1: Oh, I'm saying that. It's my opinion. Fine, I'm fine
Speaker 1: with that. I'm fine with that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so I live in Chicago.
Speaker 1: What do you expect from me?
Speaker 2: This is true? Yeah, this is true. That is a
Speaker 2: democratic machine. Yes, thank you for sticking with us this long.
Speaker 2: We're gonna continue to bring you episodes throughout twenty twenty five.
Speaker 1: And yeah, we did a good job this year. And
Speaker 1: we really did a good job last month in December.
Speaker 2: Yeah, December was great. December was great. Yes, So anyway, Oscar,
Speaker 2: Happy birthday, man, Oh my god, birthday, New Year's baby.
Speaker 1: I legit forgot, forgot it's my birthday. I mean as
Speaker 1: a recording, I'm forgetting it.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, thank you, thank you.
Speaker 2: You're very welcome. You're very welcome. How old are you?
Speaker 1: No, forty one?
Speaker 2: I mean you're forty one years old. Yeah. If we
Speaker 2: had this bottle of whiskey opened already, we're gonna wait
Speaker 2: till the second segment, we would we would toast right now.
Speaker 2: But always your birthday here, thank you after the break.
Speaker 1: Thank you, appreciate it. Send me legos to po box now.
Speaker 2: Oh god, this guy is a lego crack crack at it.
Speaker 2: I have a you really do.
Speaker 1: I also like hoarding them before building them too, So
Speaker 1: I'm like, I'm like a squirrel with all these nuts.
Speaker 2: I don't know what to do with them, you know.
Speaker 1: Anyway, moving on from that thing, I said, thank you obviously,
Speaker 1: Happy New Year to everyone. Any of New Year's plans
Speaker 1: on your end.
Speaker 2: So this is time release radio.
Speaker 1: Right when I recording this on the first the EVELL,
Speaker 1: this is it's not even Christmas yet.
Speaker 2: This is the twenty first of December. So on the
Speaker 2: twenty six, we're leaving for Florida. Right, so for New Years,
Speaker 2: we're either gonna be stending spending it at a lakeside
Speaker 2: restaurant out in central Florida and much better weather, right,
Speaker 2: much better we yeah, or will be uh maybe tarp
Speaker 2: and Springs or Saint Augustine, something like that. I want
Speaker 2: to have dinner on the water somewhere, whether it's whether
Speaker 2: it's the ocean or whether it's a lake.
Speaker 1: So basically, folks, that means that you have some time. No,
Speaker 1: you don't have some time because when it comes out,
Speaker 1: it'll be too late to go find Jay out there.
Speaker 1: He just told your locations, you know.
Speaker 2: Wait here, this is.
Speaker 1: Saint Augustine and some restaurant by a slok Man. Look
Speaker 1: for him.
Speaker 2: It's one hundred and this is one hundred and sixty
Speaker 2: second episode. I didn't mention that at the top of
Speaker 2: the show. I'm waiting for that day one hundred and
Speaker 2: sixty two. Actually, it's more because we have bonuses. We
Speaker 2: have patri unnumbered stuff that we just kind of threw
Speaker 2: out there for ships and giggles. Uh, probably over two
Speaker 2: hundred episodes. Yeah, over a damn near clothes I suppays
Speaker 2: know one's recognized my voice out there.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't know. It's not that surprising. It's happened
Speaker 1: to me. I think I mentioned it once. No, I
Speaker 1: get it. I get no, But also I get it.
Speaker 1: We are broadcasting a lot, I mean, more than your
Speaker 1: average man for a sure, right, absolutely not more than
Speaker 1: your TikToker, mind you, they post a lot of weird
Speaker 1: shit than nobody watches.
Speaker 2: But still.
Speaker 1: On my end, that's great, by the way, that's great
Speaker 1: that Yes, it's not nothing major at all. I always
Speaker 1: do an a loanely evening on New Year's Eve over
Speaker 1: the last about ten years. Unless I have a girlfriend,
Speaker 1: I kind of just run solo. And by solo, I
Speaker 1: mean I go out in Chicago, not downtown, but usually
Speaker 1: out there. I pick a bar and hang out and
Speaker 1: meet new people.
Speaker 2: Good for you.
Speaker 1: The last four times I've met and hung out during
Speaker 1: New Year's with new people wow, last year especially too.
Speaker 1: I still have I still have on my Instagram, but
Speaker 1: we don't hang out after like it's been just a
Speaker 1: New Year's thing. I never saw them again, but I
Speaker 1: met with new people. Last time. I went to a
Speaker 1: Delilah's bar. Yeah, it was one of my favorites, my
Speaker 1: favorite dive bars in the city. It's just my personal favorite.
Speaker 1: A lot of punk music. It's great. And I went
Speaker 1: there and I always have a persona too. I say
Speaker 1: a little different things like I'm just playing it up, well,
Speaker 1: having fun with it. I did have fun with it.
Speaker 1: I was having a cigarette, one of the few allowed myself,
Speaker 1: and I was outside and met a guy and we
Speaker 1: started talking and then I ended up bar crawling with them.
Speaker 1: Ended up at Mothers in downtown that night, and we
Speaker 1: spent New Year's in the train trying to get to
Speaker 1: the fireworks in time. We missed it, but we hung
Speaker 1: out with him, his friend that's a girl, not a girlfriend,
Speaker 1: and her mom who just visited from Russia. So I
Speaker 1: got all those background on these people and it was great.
Speaker 1: It was one of those that's a lot of fun.
Speaker 1: That was last year, so hopefully this year maybe something similar.
Speaker 2: Oh shit, would send us pictures or something, send me pictures.
Speaker 1: I do have pictures of that night, and probably others
Speaker 1: I could. You're right, I never do. I never share
Speaker 1: any of it.
Speaker 2: Well, it's interest. I have them. Man, that's a very
Speaker 2: hard not a lot of people could do that. I
Speaker 2: couldn't do that.
Speaker 1: Of course you can. You're a g glorious man. You
Speaker 1: know me, I met you in a glorious time period
Speaker 1: of your life. Maybe I just think you are.
Speaker 2: I think I'm not a people person. I'm just not a.
Speaker 1: Person, not a big people person either. I just go
Speaker 1: there and it's like a challenge, like a fun I'm
Speaker 1: not me kind of night.
Speaker 2: Yeah. No, I think it's great. Yeah, I wish I
Speaker 2: could do stuff like that, but it's I'm just I
Speaker 2: couldn't do it. It sounds Oh.
Speaker 1: Also, oh man, that story was so great last year.
Speaker 1: I think I can't believe I ever mentioned it on
Speaker 1: the show. I remember the guy. His name is Samir.
Speaker 1: I believe his name is Amir. I hopefully they didn't
Speaker 1: get that wrong. That's the main guy who I befriended
Speaker 1: that evening last year on New Year's Eve, and we
Speaker 1: were at I think it was Mother's and we were talking,
Speaker 1: right and he saw these two girls, hot young twenty something.
Speaker 1: They're also all twenty something. I'm by far the oldest person,
Speaker 1: by the way, and this other than the mother, I'm
Speaker 1: the oldest one. And and he was like commenting, like,
Speaker 1: oh my god, they're so cude. I'm like, go talk
Speaker 1: to him. I'm like, just go talk to him. There's
Speaker 1: a big deal, right, Like, No, No, he was like
Speaker 1: one of those. He wasn't shry about it. I'm like,
Speaker 1: I got you follow me. And I just went up
Speaker 1: to the girl, like I just want to say something.
Speaker 1: You're very fucking pretty. You're the prettiest girl in this
Speaker 1: fucking bar right now. This is my friends of her.
Speaker 1: And they talked in these switch numbers. Really they changed numbers.
Speaker 2: Look at you, man, because I left them too, because I.
Speaker 1: Left right away. I just left them to do it,
Speaker 1: you know, I just want to. I just came up
Speaker 1: there and said, I just want to say this. I
Speaker 1: said it. This is my friend SAMR.
Speaker 2: And I left. Wow. Yeah, what a wingman, dude. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I was just like, I'll just do it. I don't know,
Speaker 1: I'm not me today. It's okay.
Speaker 2: True, she happened.
Speaker 1: To be a tourist. She's like visiting from Minnesota or something.
Speaker 2: What happened with sir and this girl.
Speaker 1: I don't know. You know, we texted a little bit,
Speaker 1: uh like the next month or so, like every other week.
Speaker 1: But I mentioned that I asked about it. He nothing serious.
Speaker 1: I think, but they did talk, and I think they
Speaker 1: did hang out, but I don't know.
Speaker 2: Wouldn't be crazy if they got married all because of you.
Speaker 2: That be insane. Well that's a New Year's story, that
Speaker 2: be insane. Wow, so well fun let us know, uh,
Speaker 2: let us know what happens, man. Yeah, thanks, you'd be
Speaker 2: safe out there. Ch Cargo's getting crazy, man, Yeah, it's
Speaker 2: getting nuts. That's okay. But yeah, and I think you
Speaker 2: also said yes I did. May you have a or
Speaker 2: like a ghostly story for us? Yes, this is really rare.
Speaker 2: If you're a new listener, you don't know this. But Oscar,
Speaker 2: he's kind of the cooler. When we would go out
Speaker 2: there pre COVID and we were traveling and reporting from
Speaker 2: these crazy places, interviewing all these people, and you would
Speaker 2: never experience.
Speaker 1: Anything super rarely. I did experience something every once in
Speaker 1: a great while, particularly famously for me, memorably for me
Speaker 1: was in Ohio at that the writer was one big
Speaker 1: time that I did get something. So I did get
Speaker 1: something that's strange. I don't know if it's really supernatural,
Speaker 1: but seeing as how the location kind of thing works,
Speaker 1: it might be. So I mentioned on the show before
Speaker 1: that I playfully say that my apartment that live in,
Speaker 1: you know, it's it's haunted, a little haunted. There is
Speaker 1: something up there. I go, so, some kind maybe an
Speaker 1: energy of some kind, a person that used to be
Speaker 1: I've always called her Margie. I don't know if it's
Speaker 1: a her even, but I just say, oh, Margie's acting
Speaker 1: up again. You know, every time we hear something, every
Speaker 1: once in a while, it never it never stops. Really,
Speaker 1: it does happen every once in a while pretty consistently.
Speaker 1: It's just not enough to say. It's like, it's not
Speaker 1: every day, it's not every week, but it's enough where
Speaker 1: like if it's been a month, you're like, no, you're
Speaker 1: about to hear something, You're about to get something, and
Speaker 1: you know, it's hard to explain. Jass, my roommate has
Speaker 1: experienced weird things, especially when I'm not there. She'd be like, yeah,
Speaker 1: you're in your room right now, Like no, Like then,
Speaker 1: who turned on the lights? You know, so like in
Speaker 1: the kitchen or whatever, Like okay, well that wasn't me.
Speaker 1: And like I said, I turned them off. You left
Speaker 1: and they were off. I'm like, yeah, I did turn
Speaker 1: it off, and she's like, I didn't turn them on,
Speaker 1: so things like that would happen. And then so cut
Speaker 1: to three days ago. This is what happened. I was
Speaker 1: getting in the shower, you know, forever to get it
Speaker 1: hot or whatever. I went in and as I was
Speaker 1: like fixing my hair to get away from my eyes
Speaker 1: and start like glathering up and all that, for a
Speaker 1: split second I did I covered my eyes. So I
Speaker 1: was like wiping the water off off my face. And
Speaker 1: as soon as I did it, I saw a hand
Speaker 1: dude like coming at me, like not coming at me,
Speaker 1: maybe like a hand I was noticing in front of me.
Speaker 1: It was hard to explain the difference. It was a second.
Speaker 1: It was just a second, like I doubt it I
Speaker 1: even saw it, but I know I saw it and
Speaker 1: nothing else happened. That's it, Like that's it. And I said, Margie,
Speaker 1: I just said that, like, you know, stop it or
Speaker 1: something like she's a cat or something. But that's all
Speaker 1: I saw. It was a white hand. I saw the
Speaker 1: back of it, so it's almost like the back of
Speaker 1: the hand was moving past me or I don't know
Speaker 1: what it was. It was very strange, but it wasn't
Speaker 1: my hands because my hands were down already and it
Speaker 1: wasn't my hands because they were whiter than mine. And
Speaker 1: that's it.
Speaker 2: It was so weird. It has to happen in the
Speaker 2: fucking shower too, the worst place.
Speaker 1: Very vulnerable, very vulnerable position. You're right, so that was
Speaker 1: that was weird. And I don't know if I'm like
Speaker 1: I know, I've also been a little sleep deprive, but
Speaker 1: not enough to say I'm hallucinating. It's not that bad,
Speaker 1: So I don't know if it's that either. Yeah, it happened.
Speaker 2: I think for you to say that it might have
Speaker 2: been something because.
Speaker 1: It was very close, very fast, and that's it.
Speaker 2: That's the way they usually are.
Speaker 1: Man, Yes, that's true. And also if listeners remember remember
Speaker 1: when Lexie Raven used to be on the show, she
Speaker 1: would also say many times that the apartment was haunted too,
Speaker 1: and she mentioned a lot of things that I don't
Speaker 1: remember anymore, but that she experienced it way more than
Speaker 1: I did. But yeah, so that's something could be that.
Speaker 2: That's a horrible story. So does it give you a
Speaker 2: certain vibe because you chose a woman, you chose Margie
Speaker 2: instead of Bill.
Speaker 1: I just like the name Margie, I think.
Speaker 2: So they didn't give you any sort of a vibe.
Speaker 2: It's a woman.
Speaker 1: I could lie and say that there's a vine or
Speaker 1: a subconscious thing, but it's not. It's just the name
Speaker 1: i'd like and I went with it, got it, but
Speaker 1: it was fastly picked. I usually pick names pretty fast
Speaker 1: on things, so like so I don't know when I'm
Speaker 1: writing a story, the first two names that come up,
Speaker 1: those are the major guarl Like that's it. I don't
Speaker 1: think about it any further. So Margie was the first
Speaker 1: name I came up with. But I always treated like
Speaker 1: a fun thing and it never and there's ever been
Speaker 1: violent or creepy. I never felt that creepy.
Speaker 2: So you were creeped out that moment.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I was like what was that? Like, like what
Speaker 1: was that? Was one of those things? But then ever
Speaker 1: see the shower because nothing else happening, and what I'm
Speaker 1: gonna do is gonna I moved on and I'm not
Speaker 1: freaked down anymore. But it did happen, and we're a
Speaker 1: supernatural podcast, so no.
Speaker 2: I always bring it for sure. So great story, man,
Speaker 2: thank you. I'm sorry it happened in the shower where
Speaker 2: though it was that hand kind of reaching down and.
Speaker 1: Fun can help. No, I'm kidding, No, that's not I mean, yeah.
Speaker 2: So thank you. I guess we had a little thing
Speaker 2: happened here as well over the past week, so as
Speaker 2: you could see, maybe I should put it. I should
Speaker 2: put a picture of this whiskey collection.
Speaker 1: It's a great fucking collection. I'm jealous of your collection.
Speaker 2: I think I'll put it in this episode show notes.
Speaker 2: You guys, everyone's got to see this. So my cousin
Speaker 2: Corey Corlando. Yeah, they just they got married. Oh my god.
Speaker 2: But I'm looking at their bottle of whiskey. That was
Speaker 2: a groomsman gift from Corey, you know, like the one.
Speaker 2: But they got married back in May five, eighteen twenty four,
Speaker 2: May twenty twenty four. I stood up, of course, but
Speaker 2: I said they got Mary because I was looking at
Speaker 2: that whiskey bottle. That's not the point of the story.
Speaker 2: So Corey and my cousin is his wife, Jenny Bonquiki.
Speaker 2: They came over last week and they built me these
Speaker 2: shell Well, Corey built me these new whiskey shows made
Speaker 2: out of maple. Alas, these shelves are made out of maple,
Speaker 2: and they have what's called the live edge, so it's
Speaker 2: bark on this outmost edge of the shelving and in
Speaker 2: the lights we have the lights turned off and ship,
Speaker 2: but in the light you can see there's still there's
Speaker 2: like dried moss in the wood and stuff. It's super
Speaker 2: fucking cool. And it's made out of you know, the
Speaker 2: supports are made out of plumbing pipe and just looks
Speaker 2: really industrious.
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly, it is a cool call. It is really bad.
Speaker 1: I bring it up to others.
Speaker 2: Awesome. Yeah, I'm really proud of this. It looked so
Speaker 2: much like you at your lego me. It's whiskey.
Speaker 1: It's the way people are just is the same way
Speaker 1: I'm jealous of your whiskey collection. So that's what we're
Speaker 1: able to drink a new bottle every time.
Speaker 2: Folks, exactly, And we have another one tonight.
Speaker 1: It's new to him too. He hasn't opened a lot
Speaker 1: of these, that's right.
Speaker 2: And a lot of people got mad at me because
Speaker 2: the thing with whiskey is it's meant to be enjoyed
Speaker 2: and shared with friends and loved ones, So hoarding whiskey
Speaker 2: isn't the right way to to have whiskey anyway. So
Speaker 2: they were down here, Corey was building the shelves, Jenny was,
Speaker 2: you know, keeping him company and helping here and there,
Speaker 2: and all of a sudden she saw something down by
Speaker 2: their over by the stairs, right where we always see it,
Speaker 2: that little weird black shadow thing that's at the stairs,
Speaker 2: and and she got pretty freaked out, and she called
Speaker 2: up to us and let me know that, Hey, there's
Speaker 2: something going on down here, right, So so that happened, Yeah,
Speaker 2: you know, just another person seeing whatever we see down here. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I don't know, folks, I don't know.
Speaker 1: Well, as long as you don't experience it, you don't
Speaker 1: want to get freaked out.
Speaker 2: I really don't.
Speaker 1: Yeh, I'm too old. Yeah, we would like come at me,
Speaker 1: hot me bitch. Used to be so cavalier. Now I'm
Speaker 1: like just that. Just don't not from these hours.
Speaker 2: I don't want to be bothered by people. I want
Speaker 2: to be bothered by ghosts.
Speaker 1: My office hours are two to three pm every other Thursday.
Speaker 2: It's not right. But yeah, So anyway, some cool stuff
Speaker 2: starting off the new year.
Speaker 1: Excellent.
Speaker 2: Yea, see what happens this year? Unravels. Take a break.
Speaker 2: I think we should break, right, let's do it. Welcome
Speaker 2: back to the show. Well, the lights are turned down low.
Speaker 2: The ceremonial candle is lit and the drink is about
Speaker 2: to start flowing. Let's start this show. Okay, I am dying.
Speaker 2: Let's crack this. This has been a nice little trend
Speaker 2: we've gone over the past four or five episodes. Maybe
Speaker 2: we're opening bottles, gonna.
Speaker 1: So what we've always drank, but specifically opening or trying
Speaker 1: new bottles.
Speaker 2: No, you're right, I'm trying to describe it and just
Speaker 2: kind of give a little review. Real.
Speaker 1: No, you try to describe it. You asked me, what's
Speaker 1: it like? Oh my god, it taste like boothe but
Speaker 1: you described, yes, you try.
Speaker 2: It tastes like hatred.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it tastes like apartheid.
Speaker 2: Right, Oh my god? What first? Trump? Now a part time? What?
Speaker 2: We're never gonna make it past a lump? Are we
Speaker 2: on the show?
Speaker 1: What bar?
Speaker 2: Come on? All right? So I got to open my
Speaker 2: little app here because this is I just want to
Speaker 2: make sure I get right. So this is Penelope. The
Speaker 2: brand is Penelope, it's on. The brand is on in
Speaker 2: New Jersey. Is Penelope. No, okay, it's Penelope. Okay if
Speaker 2: you second guess myself. And this is the rose cask finish.
Speaker 2: So this is a Finland there's.
Speaker 1: No oh oh it's like an end, not a finish,
Speaker 1: not finish finish. Oh my god, you didn't know my joke.
Speaker 1: I thought you were with.
Speaker 2: No jackass. It's finished. Oh, rose wine cask. So it's
Speaker 2: a whiskey. There's no age statement on this bottle, but
Speaker 2: it's it said it's the whiskey's aged four to five
Speaker 2: years and then and it's put in for four months.
Speaker 2: It's put into. Now I can't speak French, but it's
Speaker 2: grenache grenache rose wine casks from the Southern Rhone region
Speaker 2: in France. Okay, so I'm expecting this to be kind
Speaker 2: of sweeter. It's ninety four proof, so it's not going
Speaker 2: to be super hot or it shouldn't be super hot
Speaker 2: or burning on the on the palate, Okay. And I
Speaker 2: I tend to like sweet wines, so I'm curious to
Speaker 2: see what this is going to be. Like. Beautiful bottle.
Speaker 2: The bottle looks pink when it's sitting on the shelf,
Speaker 2: almost a pink hue to it. Yes, so it sits
Speaker 2: on the shelf. And that's one of the things about
Speaker 2: collecting whiskey too, is you want to get like beautiful bottles.
Speaker 2: They just look great on.
Speaker 1: The show I mean some of them. I know you've
Speaker 1: gotten because the bottle looks cool, even if the booze
Speaker 1: in it is terrible.
Speaker 2: Absolutely right. Yes, I'm a sucker for that kind of stuff.
Speaker 2: But you know there's kind of these etched rose buds
Speaker 2: on the bottle, really really nice to a small pink
Speaker 2: label that says the rose cask finish, big p good
Speaker 2: looking font. It's just a great looking bottle. And I
Speaker 2: like the camp the top. The cork.
Speaker 1: I love that. I've never seen that before.
Speaker 2: It's like it's glass, Yeah, like a glass cork. Let's
Speaker 2: see here. Oh fuck me, I've had this.
Speaker 1: See if I can, if I can let you open
Speaker 1: pickle jars on their own here, we.
Speaker 2: Might have to edit if this might take me a
Speaker 2: minute to open. Don't want okay, no dead air, No no,
Speaker 2: I've had this bottle for a while and I'm hoping
Speaker 2: upon hope that there's nothing wrong with this cork. Yeah,
Speaker 2: there we go. I'm gonna get it on the mic ASMR.
Speaker 2: I can't get it out when we try.
Speaker 1: You want to try, Yeah, I can't try. I'm not
Speaker 1: saying I will be successful, but when.
Speaker 2: I get to go to grab first m hm hmmm,
Speaker 2: so is that is that whole thing glass which is
Speaker 2: kind of go ahead, that's really nice. Oh smell some
Speaker 2: town of a fruit. All right, let me pour you first. Oh,
Speaker 2: thank you, thank you. Here, don't don't do it.
Speaker 1: I'm just an Afghan.
Speaker 2: Okay, well here is to happy birthday, thank you, Happy
Speaker 2: New Year's. Let's see what this is like crazy kwanza.
Speaker 2: I I definitely smell like the white wine smell for sure.
Speaker 2: So like if you're a wine drinking and you've drink
Speaker 2: and rose, you could definitely smell rose for sure. Fruity. Yeah,
Speaker 2: all right, let's taste it. Yeah, I like that. I don't.
Speaker 1: I don't hate it, but you know it's funny because
Speaker 1: I don't like wine at all, but this weird fusion
Speaker 1: of whiskey with rose because I would never drink. I
Speaker 1: never I have drunk before, like in weddings, and I
Speaker 1: just hate most, if not all, wines. But this is
Speaker 1: not bad. Actually giving me an idea for a gift
Speaker 1: for someone someone like a fish.
Speaker 2: Okay, yeah, go for it. It's good. I'm I'm tasting
Speaker 2: fruity and tasting vanilla, do you okay, think of God,
Speaker 2: this is so weird. Think of a.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it tastes like the third time I got laid,
Speaker 1: you know, not the first two.
Speaker 2: Well, sometimes, you know, after a few tastes, let it
Speaker 2: open up a little bit. Right, Do you remember Hubba Bubba,
Speaker 2: the gum, the gum. Yeah, yeah, think of vaguely, ye,
Speaker 2: think of that Hubba Bubba and take a sip. Okay, seriously,
Speaker 2: am I just fucking crazy the pink, bright pink gum?
Speaker 1: Maybe a little. I'm getting what you're saying.
Speaker 2: That's so weird.
Speaker 1: But also you could be incepting me right now.
Speaker 2: I don't know. Well, it's true, I could be influencing.
Speaker 1: Think of an elephant and how sweaty they are. I'll
Speaker 1: take a drink, my balls, take my balls of the
Speaker 1: hot summer day.
Speaker 2: Okay, we got we gotta get to this show. People like,
Speaker 2: just hurry the fuck up?
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah right, people are scaping forty five talking about
Speaker 1: the brose.
Speaker 2: All right. You know what again, I think I like it.
Speaker 2: I'm definitely gonna continue drinking it this evening.
Speaker 1: I mean I would never I'm going to be my
Speaker 1: pick necessarily compared to others I've had here, but sair,
Speaker 1: it's drinkable. I will keep thinking it's good.
Speaker 2: Cool, not bad. Pour some when you're ready, I will
Speaker 2: pour some more. Poor flea, sir, I have some more
Speaker 2: archie bunker.
Speaker 1: Okay, I was doing all our twists, but.
Speaker 2: All right, let me get a sip of water. Water.
Speaker 2: So we're going back to UFOs. We're going back to Aliens.
Speaker 2: We ended the year on aliens. We're starting new year
Speaker 2: on aliens.
Speaker 1: Well, we ended the year potentially on aliens.
Speaker 2: We don't know what those are, and we still so
Speaker 2: as of this recording right twenty first, we still don't
Speaker 2: know what the fuck is going on. More and more
Speaker 2: stories are of course, listeners were talking about our impromptu
Speaker 2: episode Jersey Groans over Drones episode.
Speaker 1: Which is two episodes ago, because we've had a Christmas one.
Speaker 2: Sense correct, so you gotta stretch your memory back. That's
Speaker 2: what we're referring to that as of December twenty first,
Speaker 2: soon to be twenty second, we still don't know what
Speaker 2: those fucking things are. And there's more and more reports
Speaker 2: coming out of missing radioactive material. So more and more
Speaker 2: people are coming out and saying that those drones are
Speaker 2: sniffing out some sort of a breach somewhere, so some
Speaker 2: serious breach.
Speaker 1: I ended up saying that Joe Rogan part of a
Speaker 1: Joe william podcast about a guy they had on there
Speaker 1: about this drone stuff.
Speaker 2: So we're still keeping an eye on that one. But
Speaker 2: we're going back to aliens because I'm not sure if
Speaker 2: people are aware. But on November thirteenth, twenty twenty four,
Speaker 2: there was a second landmark congressional hearing about this stuff,
Speaker 2: titled Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon Exposing the Truth. That was on
Speaker 2: November thirteenth. November eighteenth was the very first drone sighting
Speaker 2: over New Jersey. Yes, that's when it kicked off. Coincidence.
Speaker 2: I don't know to t tell.
Speaker 1: I mean, it'd be strange, it would be much more
Speaker 1: of a connection if the congressional hearings were taking place
Speaker 1: in New Jersey.
Speaker 2: They weren't. I'm sure it was. Sure, I cannot say
Speaker 2: with one hundred percent because I didn't even think to
Speaker 2: say where they something you know that would be fucked up. Yeah,
Speaker 2: But again the timing, I mean, come on, that's suspicious.
Speaker 1: No, it is, no, it is. It's enough for us
Speaker 1: to mention it. You can't just think, you can't just
Speaker 1: ignore it. It's enough Nowhere nearly is circumstantial at best,
Speaker 1: but it's suspect.
Speaker 2: Suspect and what it would mean, what it could be,
Speaker 2: I don't know. But that's when that's when this congressional
Speaker 2: hearing happened, and then that's when the drone siding kicked
Speaker 2: off on the eighteenth of November. So we gotta before
Speaker 2: we move forward, we got to step back a little
Speaker 2: bit because we've covered the first congressional hearing on this
Speaker 2: show in a in a twist straight out of a
Speaker 2: sci fi thriller, a two point three trillion dollar COVID
Speaker 2: relief package signed into law in twenty twenty by then
Speaker 2: President Donald Trump, now President Elect, set off this chain
Speaker 2: reaction that forced the US government to confront its UFO secrets.
Speaker 2: Hidden within that relief package, called the Intelligence Authorization Act
Speaker 2: of Fiscal Year twenty twenty one, was a stunning mandate.
Speaker 2: The Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Defense
Speaker 2: were required to deliver a comprehensive report on everything they
Speaker 2: knew about UFOs, and the result, a bombshell report, first
Speaker 2: of its kind, titled Preliminary Assessment Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon, was
Speaker 2: released on June twenty fifth of twenty twenty one. That
Speaker 2: document filled with staggering revelations about UFOs, now officially referred
Speaker 2: to as UAP's Unidentified Anomalist Phenomenon, sent shockwaves through the
Speaker 2: public and the government itself. And if you guys remember,
Speaker 2: we broke down that report line by line in episode
Speaker 2: one called the UFO Report YEP, back in August of
Speaker 2: twenty twenty one. So if you if you haven't listened
Speaker 2: to that, go back and do so, because that'll kind
Speaker 2: of give you some preliminary information on what we're going
Speaker 2: to talk about tonight this second congressional hearing, okay, because
Speaker 2: now the situation has intensified. On November thirteenth, twenty twenty four,
Speaker 2: like I said, the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability
Speaker 2: held a second landmark congressional hearing, once again titled Unidentified
Speaker 2: Anomalous Phenomenon Exposing the Truth. During this historic session, the
Speaker 2: committee once again unveiled alleged classified UAP research programs, revealed
Speaker 2: previously hidden findings, scrutinized the Department of Defence's secrecy, and
Speaker 2: demanded greater transparency for the public. This latest hearing marks
Speaker 2: a significant step forward and uncovering the government's long held
Speaker 2: secrets about unidentified aerial phenomenon. So in tonight's episode, we're
Speaker 2: going to take you through some explosive new evidence for
Speaker 2: the existence of non human UAP activity, namely evidence that
Speaker 2: comes straight from a clandestine department and report, both called
Speaker 2: Immaculate Constellation. I just love the names, and I kind
Speaker 2: of hate it. It's a thought of that dude, I know, right,
Speaker 2: whose job is it immaculated?
Speaker 1: I want to meet the people whose job it is
Speaker 1: to name these things. Okay, there's some really freaky one though.
Speaker 2: If you don't want people to be interested and look
Speaker 2: your way, don't don't name it. Name it fucking Bob
Speaker 2: shopping List, motherfucker.
Speaker 1: You know, or R Project to Be or whatever. You know,
Speaker 1: it's what the so weird?
Speaker 2: They're not Immaculate Constellation.
Speaker 1: I mean, we can't say we're not dramatic in our government.
Speaker 1: We can be dramatic and true. I mean, it's clearly
Speaker 1: it's a little fun. I think it's trying to be
Speaker 1: a little fun. I can't imagine it's not.
Speaker 2: So we're gonna we're gonna dissect the document's implications and
Speaker 2: delve into what this lad is hearing reveals about the
Speaker 2: government's long held secrets.
Speaker 1: So if you're too you know, it's you know, these
Speaker 1: documents and hearing can be pretty dry and boring, even
Speaker 1: if you are interested in the subject. So fear not, folks,
Speaker 1: we saw and read it for you.
Speaker 2: Yes, that's what we're right. Condense it. I tried to
Speaker 2: punch it up a little bit without eliminating thing eliminiting.
Speaker 1: Because you know, in these in these congressional hearings of
Speaker 1: any kind, any in history, when you no matter what
Speaker 1: size of a bomb they drop on on the mic,
Speaker 1: it sounds like a regular conversation, like they're having a
Speaker 1: Tuesday toast. You know, it doesn't sound like anything, point right.
Speaker 1: It's always like nothing.
Speaker 2: There's some crazy shit in here, man, right.
Speaker 1: And they just say it and move on, move on,
Speaker 1: next question.
Speaker 2: Yeah right, yeah. Or if it's you know something that
Speaker 2: maybe the answer is just to mind blowing, to just
Speaker 2: be like that's for a closed door discussion, you know,
Speaker 2: and then move on.
Speaker 1: What right?
Speaker 2: Tell me? I don't know. So between the first congressional
Speaker 2: hearing now this one, the people coming out and government
Speaker 2: coming out and saying we don't know what those drones
Speaker 2: are flying over, could we finally be seeing the end
Speaker 2: of UAP cover ups. I hope so, I really hope
Speaker 2: so Okay. On November thirteenth, twenty twenty four, the House
Speaker 2: Committee on Oversight and Accountability conducted that joint hearing again
Speaker 2: titled Unidentified Anomalist Phenomenon Exposing the Truth. The hearing was
Speaker 2: led by Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Information Technology, and govern from
Speaker 2: an Innovation Chairwoman Nancy Mace, a Republican from South Carolina,
Speaker 2: and Subcommittee on National Security, the Border and Foreign Affairs
Speaker 2: Chairman Glenn Groffman, a Republican from Wisconsin, our neighbors to
Speaker 2: the north. Right. As stated by Chairwoman Mace and Chairman Groffman, quote,
Speaker 2: Americans deserve to understand what the government has learned about
Speaker 2: UAP sightings and the nature of any potential threats these
Speaker 2: phenomena pos. We can only ensure that understanding by providing consistent,
Speaker 2: systemic transparency end quote. Right.
Speaker 1: Basically one of the very precious few bipartisan issues I'm
Speaker 1: behind on so far.
Speaker 2: Yeah right, Yeah.
Speaker 1: Both sides of the are like, can we stop with
Speaker 1: this sleuthing in the shadow?
Speaker 2: Shit?
Speaker 1: Can just tell us?
Speaker 2: Just tell us that danger One.
Speaker 1: Thing we all can agree on that the public Republicans
Speaker 1: and Democrats can all agree on this.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yep, because Crats and Republicans are both seeing this
Speaker 2: shit and experiencing the shit.
Speaker 1: And their beholdings of their constituents too, who want to know.
Speaker 2: If they want to be re elected.
Speaker 1: Yes, right, right, I mean, you know, among other reasons
Speaker 1: like price of milk, right, but yes.
Speaker 2: Now they're hearing. Brought together four witnesses with diverse expertise
Speaker 2: in government operations, military aviation, and investigative reporting to address
Speaker 2: critical questions about UAP oversight, safety implications, and the balance
Speaker 2: between necessary national security and public disclosure, which I'm sure
Speaker 2: is a very tight rope to walk, but it's got
Speaker 2: to be walked. People need to know if there's threats
Speaker 2: out there. So the four panel members were One was
Speaker 2: Luis Elizondo. Now, he's the former director of the Advanced
Speaker 2: Aerospace Threat Identification Program or a TIP.
Speaker 1: We talked about them.
Speaker 2: We have YEP and Special Access Programs Manager. Alexondo has
Speaker 2: extensive experience in UAP monitoring, particularly concerning sensitive military installations.
Speaker 2: He's also addressed issues related to allege possession of UAP
Speaker 2: technologies by the United States and other nations, as well
Speaker 2: as the need for coordinated governmental responses and whistlebower protections.
Speaker 2: Louis Alesando's also involved with To the Stars Academy, and
Speaker 2: we also talked about that before. We have YEP with
Speaker 2: Tom DeLong, almost said Mark oppis Tom DeLong of singer
Speaker 2: and guitarist for blink onin eighty two. Right, So there,
Speaker 2: and he's all about exposure and he's big into the
Speaker 2: alien thing. So that Louis Alexando. The second witness was
Speaker 2: Rear Admiral Timothy Galdett, retired. He's former commander of the
Speaker 2: Naval Meteorology and Oceanography Command and acting Administer of the
Speaker 2: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Noah Goldette has firsthand experience
Speaker 2: with UAP safety incidents during military exercises and has expressed
Speaker 2: concerns about overclassification and information suppression. He advocates for greater transparency,
Speaker 2: congressional oversight, and open scientific research into UAPs.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he's I call him the highest ranking man on
Speaker 1: the ground guy because he had to hear all those
Speaker 1: reports as they were coming in throughout his command, which
Speaker 1: is a lot of people. Yeah, but where else do
Speaker 1: they have to filter through somewhere?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: That's the closest to the ground level. You can as
Speaker 1: high as ranking, so you can this panel.
Speaker 2: Yeah yeah, right, yeah, yeah, he has knowledge of UAP
Speaker 2: incidents happening during military exercises. What the fuck?
Speaker 1: Right, that's why we need him there as a witness.
Speaker 2: This guy's not a liar, right, you don't. He don't
Speaker 2: make shit up, right, you know.
Speaker 1: I wonder if he speaks, hopefully not natively for him,
Speaker 1: that he uh like that he's retired, like his awareness
Speaker 1: of the situation, his obligation to tell the public and
Speaker 1: be a witness. Hopefully that kind of that decision didn't
Speaker 1: lead him to have to be retired in order to
Speaker 1: do it. I don't know, you know what I'm saying. No,
Speaker 1: it's like it's how It's how some military people, maybe
Speaker 1: in the past, I mean not not maybe for sure
Speaker 1: in the past, but hopefully not anymore of these days,
Speaker 1: would only come out as gay, for example, once they
Speaker 1: retired from the military, because they don't want to repercussion repercussions,
Speaker 1: either legal or illegal.
Speaker 2: Right, It's it certainly could be he's like, well, fuck it,
Speaker 2: you can't take my career for me now my pensions
Speaker 2: in full swing, right, what are you gonna do right,
Speaker 2: you know, certainly could be now. The third panel member
Speaker 2: was a man named Mike Gold now Mike Gold. He's
Speaker 2: former NASA a so Seiate Administrator for Space Policy and Partnerships,
Speaker 2: and he's currently the Chief Growth Officer at Redwire Space,
Speaker 2: a leading company in the aerospace industry. Gold served NASA's
Speaker 2: UAP Independent Study Team and has emphasized the role of
Speaker 2: civil and commercial sectors in UAP research. He highlights the
Speaker 2: importance of combating stigma, improving data collection and analysis, and
Speaker 2: leveraging NASA's international partnerships to advancing understanding of UAPs. It
Speaker 2: all makes sense. NASA's got the technology up there already.
Speaker 2: All this stuff is very heavy and heavy, and.
Speaker 1: His face calendar must be insane. His Google Docs calendar
Speaker 1: must be fucking nuts.
Speaker 2: Bro. Yeah, watch they have all these like UFO meetings.
Speaker 1: Class and in Google and Google and Google.
Speaker 2: Not even a paid version. And the fourth member of
Speaker 2: this pan was a man named Michael Schellenberger. Schellenberger, he's
Speaker 2: an investigative journalist kind of popular for his work on
Speaker 2: government transparency issues related to UAPs. Shellenberger has documented inconsistent
Speaker 2: responses from the DoD the Department of Defense and Intelligence
Speaker 2: community communities regarding UAP, and he's called for legislative action
Speaker 2: to enhance disclosure and accountability. Okay, Now, as you could
Speaker 2: probably imagine, a lot was revealed during this hearing. The
Speaker 2: existence of non human UAP, the fact that our government
Speaker 2: is in possession of non human UAP craft, the fact
Speaker 2: that humans have been injured during UAP encounters. All this
Speaker 2: and more were revealed during this meeting. But just enough
Speaker 2: because at the same time there was a lot of
Speaker 2: I cannot legally discuss that, or we could talk about
Speaker 2: that in a close door meeting and comment. I have
Speaker 2: no knowledge of that. No comment. I just suggest you
Speaker 2: watched the session in its entirety. You can find it
Speaker 2: on YouTube.
Speaker 1: It's two hours long.
Speaker 2: Yeah, digestible two hours. But for me, I think the
Speaker 2: most interesting thing that was revealed was that secret program
Speaker 2: and document called Immaculate Constellation. I can't take it seriously now.
Speaker 2: Maculate Constellation is believed to be a highly, highly secretive,
Speaker 2: unacknowledged special access program operated by the US government designed
Speaker 2: to centralize intelligence and data on UAPs on UFOs. According
Speaker 2: to testimony during this congressional hearing, the program functions as
Speaker 2: a comprehensive hub for collecting, analyzing, and monitoring UAP related data.
Speaker 2: And it's allegedly been an operational in existence for decades.
Speaker 2: No one knew this fucking thing was there, but there
Speaker 2: it was, churning out this data, collecting and storing this data. Now.
Speaker 2: Whistleblowers claim the program includes classified high definition UAP footage,
Speaker 2: such as a thirteen minute video showing a UAP emerging
Speaker 2: from the ocean near Kuwait, captured with remarkable clarity by
Speaker 2: advanced sensors on a military helicopter. Thirteen minutes. Yeah, this
Speaker 2: isn't a little flash in the sky by someone in
Speaker 2: a fucking polaroid camera.
Speaker 1: Or a hand in your shower.
Speaker 2: Oh, I need a drink, you know.
Speaker 1: I know, we're talking about like some of the what
Speaker 1: they're hearing mentioned and highlights. One of the things that
Speaker 1: before I forget it, one of my favorite little things
Speaker 1: that the hearing like further, you know, was convincing and
Speaker 1: fun to check, is that they also mentioned talked about
Speaker 1: those military videos that we promoted a few years ago
Speaker 1: or less than a few.
Speaker 2: Years ago, like the tic TAC that can go fast.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they further talked about them and used them as
Speaker 1: examples and evidence like it was it was mentioned again,
Speaker 1: meaning that they are real because a lot of people
Speaker 1: were not convinced when they first popped online. I'm sure
Speaker 1: a lot of people were not convinced. We were, probably,
Speaker 1: but further commits. It's cool to get more, you know, confirmation,
Speaker 1: confirmation and right yeah, like the little thing not a
Speaker 1: major yeah now.
Speaker 2: Witnesses alleged that Immaculate Constellation operates outside conventional oversight mechanisms,
Speaker 2: keeping Congress and other government bodies unaware of its true scope, funding,
Speaker 2: and findings. Whistleblowers seeking to expose the program's activities have
Speaker 2: reportedly faced significant retaliation, including professional harassment, threats to their careers,
Speaker 2: and even personal harm. It's like fucking It's like a
Speaker 2: Hollywood movie, Yeah it is. Critics argue that this lack
Speaker 2: of transparency not only undermines congressional oversight, but also prevents
Speaker 2: the broader scientific community from analyzing the phenomena. Moreover, concerns
Speaker 2: have been raised about potential collaborations with private contractors, which
Speaker 2: could further obscure accountability and control over sensitive UAP related technologies.
Speaker 1: Do you think they have a printing machine just entirely
Speaker 1: used for printing NDAs.
Speaker 2: Yeah right, I'm telling you man, this is deep stuff.
Speaker 2: This is deep stuff. Not to mention the question of
Speaker 2: whether or not public tax dollars are secretly being diverted
Speaker 2: to this program to fund it.
Speaker 1: I imagine it has to because they're already government workers.
Speaker 2: It has to be. I'm sure it is.
Speaker 1: There's no way it's not, because they the fact that
Speaker 1: they exist, are working on it if they're paid at
Speaker 1: all for it?
Speaker 2: And yeah, perc or is the funding like this, you know,
Speaker 2: from some public entity that we have no idea who
Speaker 2: it is. They're the ones showing money into it. Who knows?
Speaker 1: Oh, like it's connect aus to some private investor of
Speaker 1: some kind. Yeah, I mean that's possible too.
Speaker 2: Some foreign government who knows.
Speaker 1: I don't know, right, I mean, I won't be surprised
Speaker 1: for either, or both or all.
Speaker 2: The mere existence of Immaculate Constellation highlights the deeply entrenched
Speaker 2: secrecy surrounding UAP investigations and raises urgent questions about its goals.
Speaker 2: Is the program limited to passive observation and data collection,
Speaker 2: or does it actively engage in reverse engineering and experimental
Speaker 2: research on advanced, potentially non human technologies? The panel answered
Speaker 2: yes to that question. By the way, Yeah, apparently the
Speaker 2: US is in possession of such technologies and has reverse
Speaker 2: engineered it, and so of our adversaries. Can you imagine
Speaker 2: if Putin had or some fucking North Korean edertry warlord. Yeah,
Speaker 2: North Korea reverse engineered some some world shadowing technology, shattering techno.
Speaker 2: That's fucking terrifying.
Speaker 1: People need to know it definitely can be.
Speaker 2: And to what end? To what risk to the United States?
Speaker 2: Who knows? It's terrifying thought? Yeah, critics contend, and I
Speaker 2: wholeheartedly agree that excessive classification damages public trust, it restricts
Speaker 2: scientific progress, and hinders national security decision making.
Speaker 1: One goes back to Gallel saying that there are the
Speaker 1: revolves are on the sun thing like, that's exactly what
Speaker 1: this is.
Speaker 2: That's what happens when you leave critical information siloed and unexamined.
Speaker 2: If to classified, the data within immaculate constellation could offer
Speaker 2: profound insights into advanced aerodynamics, propulsion systems and the potential
Speaker 2: origins of these phenomena, while also addressing safety and security
Speaker 2: concerns surrounding UAP encounters, of which it seems there are
Speaker 2: plenty of concerns. It's important to note that Immaculate Constellation
Speaker 2: operations reportedly involve the aggregation of information from multiple advanced sources,
Speaker 2: including high resolution satellite imagery, military grade sensors, flear footage
Speaker 2: or infrared footage, infrared radar systems, and human intelligent intelligence
Speaker 2: reports from trained observers like military pilots and naval personnel.
Speaker 2: These are not reports from Joe Bob, the pig farmer
Speaker 2: in the backwoods of Mississippi armed with the Polaroid camera
Speaker 2: from nineteen seventy three. No, this is data recorded on
Speaker 2: some of the world's most sophisticated equipment and or data
Speaker 2: reported by highly trained individuals, and these data sources span
Speaker 2: diverse environments including low Earth orbit, the upper atmosphere, standard
Speaker 2: aviation altitudes, and maritime regions, particularly particularly near sensitive military
Speaker 2: installations and near nuclear facilities.
Speaker 1: Yes, and airports too. I believe those.
Speaker 2: Airports as well YEP. During the hearing, witnesses testified that
Speaker 2: Immaculate Constellation utilizes cutting edge image and detection technologies such
Speaker 2: as multi spectral and hyper spectral imaging to gather detailed
Speaker 2: visual and thermal data. This allows the program to document
Speaker 2: UAPs in extraordinary detail and in color, including their shapes,
Speaker 2: flight dynamics, and thermal signatures. Examples of UAPs reportedly cataloged
Speaker 2: include spherical orbs with unusual flight patterns, disc shaped objects
Speaker 2: exhibiting advanced propulsion capabilities, and triangular or irregularly shaped phenomenon
Speaker 2: that defy conventional aerodynamics science as we know it, physics
Speaker 2: as we know it. So I want to look closer
Speaker 2: at each of these amazing UAP incidents as outlined in
Speaker 2: the Immaculate Constellation document, but just to give you a taste,
Speaker 2: just a.
Speaker 1: Little, a nibble, just a skick.
Speaker 2: One reported incident described an orb like UAP actively disrupting
Speaker 2: an F twenty two fighter jets operations, essentially forcing this
Speaker 2: highly advanced jet out of its patrol area. Another incident
Speaker 2: involved a sphere descending from high altitude to hover just
Speaker 2: above a US Navy nuclear aircraft character carrier, demonstrating behavior
Speaker 2: incosssistant with known aircraft or natural phenomena. I mean, just
Speaker 2: amazing stuff. Spielberg type shit.
Speaker 1: Legit, Yeah, I mean those were weird shapes in that
Speaker 1: movie too, you know they really were. Those are bizarre ships,
Speaker 1: A lot of lights, a lot of hey, we're here
Speaker 1: kind of bravado showiness. Yeah, but it's good bravado showiness, right, Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's starting to look like is the only difference between
Speaker 1: that and this is that there's a wholesome wanting of
Speaker 1: communication between both the aliens and the government in that
Speaker 1: movie that is clearly not visible here in our reality.
Speaker 1: That's the only real difference. Not yet, right, not yet.
Speaker 2: We can hope we could have our fingers crossed. Right,
Speaker 2: And keep in mind, if just one of these following
Speaker 2: incidents that we're going to talk about, just one of
Speaker 2: them is true, we'll changing implications right there, change the.
Speaker 1: World, or at least it should be.
Speaker 2: Yeah, all right. So the first round of sightings I
Speaker 2: want to talk about comes from the highly sophisticated equipment
Speaker 2: we just mentioned, high resolution satellite imagery, military grade censors,
Speaker 2: far hyper spectral imaging, stuff like that, And the report
Speaker 2: Immaculate Constellation refers to this data set as US Government
Speaker 2: Imagery Intelligence US Government Imagery Intelligence. So the first report,
Speaker 2: the first actual UAP sighting that we want to go through,
Speaker 2: is called the CENTCOM Cuboid Formation of metallic ORBS. Now,
Speaker 2: so you know CENTCOM or United States Central Command, is
Speaker 2: a key military organization responsible for safeguarding and advancing US
Speaker 2: interests across the Middle East, Central and South Asia, as
Speaker 2: well as all those surrounding waterways. Okay, so the government
Speaker 2: is in possession of full motion video and forward looking
Speaker 2: infrared footage or FLEAR footage captured during daylight hours that
Speaker 2: depicts a formation of approximately twelve metallic orbs skimming the
Speaker 2: ocean surface at high speeds before dispersing in multiple directions.
Speaker 2: The orbs each measuring between three and six meters or
Speaker 2: nine point eight to nineteen point seven feet in diameter.
Speaker 2: These are big fucking orbs. These are big things. They
Speaker 2: exhibited rapid and agile movements incompatible with any known aerospace vehicles.
Speaker 2: In the initial segment of the footage, the orbs flew
Speaker 2: in a tight cuboid shaped formation, like a cube right cuboid.
Speaker 2: The formation consisted of three vertical square arrangements of about
Speaker 2: four orbs, each organized into a three prown configuration that
Speaker 2: appeared cube like when viewed from a distance on FLEAR imagery.
Speaker 2: All the orbs were white hot, contrasting against the black
Speaker 2: cold ocean surface below. Each orb exhibited faint atmospheric distortions
Speaker 2: around itself, along with the visible heat shimmer or contrail
Speaker 2: that trailed behind as they moved. The metallic orbs maintained
Speaker 2: their cube like formation over the ocean for a period
Speaker 2: before abruptly breaking into pairs. Most of the orbs ascended rapidly,
Speaker 2: gaining altitude and accelerating the speeds that exceeded the tracking
Speaker 2: capabilities of the sensor platform. However, two of the orbs
Speaker 2: continued along the original trajectory of the large formation and
Speaker 2: remained under under observation. That display, or this display of
Speaker 2: advance maneuvering and speed underscore is the anomalous natures of
Speaker 2: the orbs and their apparent capabilities. So that's the first
Speaker 2: sighting in this report. Yeah, massive orbs doing crazy shit
Speaker 2: over the ocean for an extended period of time on
Speaker 2: their own propulsion system.
Speaker 1: Right playing right at the valkyries, so.
Speaker 2: Seeming to I don't know the way it distorts the
Speaker 2: air around them. I don't know if that's part of its.
Speaker 1: Well, remember I don't remember the episode of the context
Speaker 1: behind this bar. There was a time when we talked
Speaker 1: about aliens and we talked about how how the flying
Speaker 1: saucer shape wants, especially how they look it looks bizarre
Speaker 1: the way they fly. They don't fly like in an
Speaker 1: aerodynamic way, so the wind doesn't hit them as much
Speaker 1: and therefore resist their whatever because they don't have a
Speaker 1: propulsion the way we think of our aircraft. The way
Speaker 1: they do is that they fall straight down. They look
Speaker 1: like a whole saucer in the whole time. They almost
Speaker 1: look like they're not moving. It's like everything that was
Speaker 1: moving around them. And I think what we mentioned then,
Speaker 1: I don't know how I bought this a lot of
Speaker 1: the time, but is that what it's doing hypothetically, is
Speaker 1: that the saucer is bending gravity around.
Speaker 2: It, almost like it's falling forward or something.
Speaker 1: Right, So it's constantly falling in the direction it wants
Speaker 1: to go at rapid speeds with precision and turning. Because gravity,
Speaker 1: if gravity can be manipulated in a certain diameter, right
Speaker 1: in a certain area, you can you can switch and
Speaker 1: go in a direction impulsively if you want. And that's
Speaker 1: why they can do maneuvers that are impossible for us
Speaker 1: to copy. Right, And I remember that that being a thing,
Speaker 1: and I remember also that that can probably warp the
Speaker 1: outer edges of the air around it.
Speaker 2: I would guess right.
Speaker 1: This seems like a conceivable thing. This is where my
Speaker 1: scientific mind stops because I don't have one, but I
Speaker 1: feel like that sounds.
Speaker 2: Right, So that's what Maybe it's happened here, right, that's.
Speaker 1: My theory on this one.
Speaker 2: It's weird.
Speaker 1: Shit, what are we talking remember about?
Speaker 2: What was that for? I mean, we did a three
Speaker 2: part series. We've done a lot of us and yeah,
Speaker 2: we've done so much.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you're right, impossible to tell. It was a long
Speaker 1: time ago.
Speaker 2: If anyone out there remembers, let us know, right, Yeah,
Speaker 2: all right, So it gets, it moves on, it gets stranger.
Speaker 2: This is another report from Scentcom. Okay, this one's called
Speaker 2: fast Mover Observed over Sensitive Facilities Fast Mover. There exists
Speaker 2: FLEAR footage that captured a small to medium sized oval
Speaker 2: shaped UAP moving at high speeds and flying close to
Speaker 2: the surface of the ocean. The recording begins during routine
Speaker 2: surveillance of a sensitive coastal facility, when the UAP suddenly
Speaker 2: enters the frame, flying swiftly above this coastal area. It's
Speaker 2: never named exactly where, but I explained what Scentcom was
Speaker 2: and what it oversees. The oval UAP then executes a
Speaker 2: sharp rapid turn towards the ocean, where it's tracked by
Speaker 2: the surveillance platform. It continues to fly low over the
Speaker 2: open ocean at an exceptionally high speed before the tracking
Speaker 2: system loses it just blows past the tracking system. Gone weird. Uh.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we don't have a lot of video accounts on this.
Speaker 2: Yes, there is a video. Do we have it? Yeah?
Speaker 1: No, that's what I'm saying, we don't have it. That's
Speaker 1: why I mean said, I'm sorry. I meant to say
Speaker 1: the public this.
Speaker 2: Is not available. It is not available, not yet. Oh
Speaker 2: it is written report.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I've only seen any it. Do you expect this
Speaker 1: kind of stuff to be revealed at some point?
Speaker 2: I don't. I'm man a thirteen minute video of a
Speaker 2: UAP coming out of the ocean. I don't think we'll
Speaker 2: ever see that. No, I wish to god we.
Speaker 1: Would because it's long, or because it's showing sensitive.
Speaker 2: I think it's just so mindful because people could right
Speaker 2: now still say yeah right, but you put it in
Speaker 2: someone's face.
Speaker 1: So that's that's past the rubicon that crosses it. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's what you think. I think, so legit question. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's possibly I.
Speaker 2: Think there's part of the problem with disclosure is that
Speaker 2: some people will make them lose their fucking minds.
Speaker 1: But we can't also dictate our lives based on a
Speaker 1: few people that will lose their damn minds. But unfortunately, though,
Speaker 1: that's like saying John sang those songs and they would
Speaker 1: have gotten killed by that crazy cook because that makes
Speaker 1: no sense. That makes no sense, chatman, Yeah, that makes
Speaker 1: no sense.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't know. Okay, Now this is from something
Speaker 2: called Indo pack Com INDO pat Com, and it's called
Speaker 2: intelligence vessels observing a reproduction view vehicle. What's that? So
Speaker 2: I'm assuming a reproduction vehicle is reverse engineering technologies, I think.
Speaker 2: But so you know, INDO Patcom or United States Indo
Speaker 2: Pacific Command is a unified combatant command within the US
Speaker 2: Armed Forces tasked with protecting and advancing US interests across
Speaker 2: Asia Pacific region. So this is coming from the Asia
Speaker 2: Pacific region, from Indo pat Coom. Now, the government is
Speaker 2: in possession of infrared footage and imagery that reveals a
Speaker 2: grouping of vessels conducting signals intelligence and measurement and signal
Speaker 2: intelligence operations at night in a specific region of the
Speaker 2: Pacific Ocean. During this surveillance, a large equilateral triangle UAP
Speaker 2: suddenly appears boom directly overhead the ships. The UAP features
Speaker 2: three bright lights at each of its corners and is
Speaker 2: observed to slowly rotate on its horizontal access. As it rotates,
Speaker 2: the UAP reveals a horizontal bar of sweeping lights. Intelligence
Speaker 2: analysts of this event identifies the UAP as a reproduction
Speaker 2: vehicle and concludes that the vessels were likely aware of
Speaker 2: the reproduction reproduction vehicle's frequent activity in the area, almost
Speaker 2: like the vessels were there for that reason to observe
Speaker 2: this thing. This conclusion is supported by the prepositioning of
Speaker 2: advanced foreign collection assets at the precise location and time
Speaker 2: of the sighting. The reproduction vehicle hovers and rotates approximately
Speaker 2: five hundred to one thousand meters or about sixteen forty
Speaker 2: to three thousand, two hundred and eighty one feet above
Speaker 2: the ocean for a brief period before vanishing. The footage
Speaker 2: ends immediately after its disappearance. Now, it never explains in
Speaker 2: the document exactly what an RV or a reproduction vehicle is,
Speaker 2: but it's exactly. It's basically a reproduction of something else. Yeah,
Speaker 2: so I'm thinking reverse engineering. Who's doing the reverse engineering?
Speaker 2: And how did our assets, our military assets know what
Speaker 2: was going to be there at that time in that space.
Speaker 2: It doesn't say I don't know, I have no answers,
Speaker 2: but it's fucking weird. Again, it's weird. This is another
Speaker 2: one from Indo pac Com. It's called the Equilateral triangle
Speaker 2: UAP shadowing an unaware vessel. Infrared footage on government networks
Speaker 2: captures an equilateral triangular shaped UAP, roughly the size of
Speaker 2: a fighter jet, hovering less than two hundred meters or
Speaker 2: six hundred and fifty six feet above a vessel at night,
Speaker 2: again in the Pacific Ocean. Intelligence In that analysts identify
Speaker 2: the UAP as again an RV, a reproduction vehicle, or
Speaker 2: then this one, they also referred to it as an ARV,
Speaker 2: an alien reproduction vehicle of unknown origin. The footage shows
Speaker 2: no indication that the vessel is aware of the UAP's presence.
Speaker 2: Directly overhead, two lights on the underside of the ARV
Speaker 2: or RV are clearly visible, while a third light is
Speaker 2: obscured due to the object's slightly upward angle of orientation.
Speaker 2: The UAP maintains altitude and bearing throughout this whole observation,
Speaker 2: creating a mysterious and unnerving scene. So these ships that
Speaker 2: are out there, they have the radar, couldn't get it out,
Speaker 2: but it seems that they were completely unaware of what
Speaker 2: was going on right above.
Speaker 1: Their heads, and radar would show that, right, because I
Speaker 1: assume it's three sixty right and all around kind of
Speaker 1: sphere kind of thing is the and just go straight back.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 1: Me too, I'm assuming I might said it sounds right right,
Speaker 1: I mean, that's like a logical leap. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I'm obviously fascinated by what they're keeping this, you know,
Speaker 1: keeping away. Particularly, I'm really interested, really interested in their
Speaker 1: collusion with private companies, private mega companies that must have
Speaker 1: some pies, some fingers in some of these pies. Because
Speaker 1: of the costs regarding reverse engineering and testing these things,
Speaker 1: I do feel like some of it could lead to that,
Speaker 1: And obviously they're not going to mention it here. I
Speaker 1: don't know if we'll ever know that answer, but it
Speaker 1: does seem like that's what they're keeping away on purpose too.
Speaker 1: Like other people involved, not just federally speaking or militarily speaking, yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry.
Speaker 2: I don't, I don't.
Speaker 1: I don't know what to say about this one.
Speaker 2: It's just like, wow, it's not in Tusay. This is
Speaker 2: another one from the Pacific or Indo pac com. This
Speaker 2: is a large disc using clouds for concealment. Oh this
Speaker 2: so there exists overhead persistent infrared footage that captures a
Speaker 2: large saucer shaped UAP emerge from a dense cloud formation.
Speaker 2: The saucer appears black hot against a white coal background
Speaker 2: in the thermal imagery, with visible atmospheric disturbances caused by
Speaker 2: its movement. Measuring approximately two hundred to four hundred meters
Speaker 2: or six hundred and fifty six to about oney three
Speaker 2: hundred and twelve feet in circumference, again huge, the UAP
Speaker 2: features symmetrical concavities on its upper surface. The footage shows
Speaker 2: the saucer emerging at a shallow upward angle, traveling towards
Speaker 2: the atmosphere. After breaching the cloud cover, the UAP abruptly
Speaker 2: reverses direction, partially descending back into the cloud formation before
Speaker 2: accelerating rapidly out of frame. During its retreat, the saucer
Speaker 2: becomes partially obscured by the cloud tops. The evasive nature
Speaker 2: of its maneuvers suggests that the UAP became aware that
Speaker 2: it was being watched by a space based surveillance system. Wow, man,
Speaker 2: is that cool. That is some that that reminds me
Speaker 2: like some independence station.
Speaker 1: It is kind of like a right, yeah, yeah, it
Speaker 1: is like an independence day. Although that was bad news.
Speaker 2: Yeah that didn't work out.
Speaker 1: No, no, no, I mean it did work out for us.
Speaker 2: I guess.
Speaker 1: I mean we went, we wanted the end. I mean,
Speaker 1: but that's not what I meant by that, gotcha. Uh,
Speaker 1: all right, moving on, Yeah, I mean yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 2: It's okay, man, this is mind blowing stuff. It's last
Speaker 2: one out of indoor popcom Boomerang UAP documented by pilot
Speaker 2: and sensors so Flear footage captured a a swept boomerang shape.
Speaker 2: They called it swept boomerang shape UAP Maneuvering at an
Speaker 2: indeterminate altitude off the eastern coast of a country. The
Speaker 2: UAP is tracked against a cloud backdrop by the sensor
Speaker 2: suite of the observing aircraft. During the footage, the UAP
Speaker 2: exhibits rapid deceleration come into a stationary hover Following this
Speaker 2: a sphere of light is emitted from the junction of
Speaker 2: the boomerangs two wings. Okay, this sphere expands and begins
Speaker 2: to rotate, partially engulfing the UAP in a luminous dynamic field.
Speaker 2: The recording end shortly after this event, leaving the object
Speaker 2: subsequent behavior or trajectory unknown. So let's dissect this.
Speaker 1: Are you imagining this boomerang aircraft flying like a boomerang
Speaker 1: like it's spinning because I was. I mean, I don't
Speaker 1: know if that's very practical.
Speaker 2: That's a legit known shape for you at the boomerang
Speaker 2: shape class.
Speaker 1: But I imagine when they're saying, oh, it's boomerang shaped saucers
Speaker 1: flying above me, I'm imagining.
Speaker 2: It's a fun saucer.
Speaker 1: Dude, that's a party saucer, right, that's all the fun
Speaker 1: is that.
Speaker 2: I want to talk about this sphere that comes out
Speaker 2: of this thing, because it says the sphere expands, rotates,
Speaker 2: partially engulfing the UAP in a luminous dynamic field. Think
Speaker 2: about the stories that are coming out of New Jersey
Speaker 2: of these UAPs and the orbs and their glow and
Speaker 2: they glow. Uh we said in that Jersey drone episode
Speaker 2: that one of the theories is the ORBS is some
Speaker 2: sort of cloaking.
Speaker 1: Mechanic mechanism to hide these drones. Dude, it's it's wild. Also,
Speaker 1: like again, it makes us it begs the question, there's
Speaker 1: is this coincidence this report, the way these things are
Speaker 1: acting based on what we're reading to you right now
Speaker 1: from Immaculate what constellation constellage almost a conception versus I
Speaker 1: know is wrong. I'm like, it's it doesn't feel like
Speaker 1: a coincident. Also doesn't, but I mean, luckily it does
Speaker 1: make me feel a little better that the drones are
Speaker 1: not a foreign nation trying to spy or attack us, hopefully.
Speaker 1: I don't know why that's worse. I feel like that's
Speaker 1: worse than aliens, or are the repercussions of that would
Speaker 1: be worse for humanity maybe in general than aliens. Like aliens,
Speaker 1: I can forgive aliens. They're trying to trying to suss
Speaker 1: us out, you know, trying.
Speaker 2: To test us.
Speaker 1: But yeah, yeah, it's it's why I feel like there's
Speaker 1: it can't be a coincidence. I'm not convinced that it's
Speaker 1: not that you know, oh that it is a.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so you're into this. Yeah, you know. So we're
Speaker 2: we're leaving Indo pat Com. Now we're getting reports from Northcom. Okay,
Speaker 2: and this is I love this one. This one's called
Speaker 2: the jellyfish UAP.
Speaker 1: Yeah, this is my favorite.
Speaker 2: Observed crossing the US Mexico border, Oscar. Mm hm.
Speaker 1: I ordered that, but never came. I think I got
Speaker 1: stuck down there.
Speaker 2: So NORTHCOMB for those of you who don't know, United
Speaker 2: States Northern Command a Department Department of Defense organization task
Speaker 2: with defending the United States and its interests. Its mission
Speaker 2: is to protect the homeland, safeguard the American people, preserve
Speaker 2: national power, and ensure freedom of action. Northcom's responsibilities include
Speaker 2: the defense of Alaska and the continental United States, as
Speaker 2: well as coordination with the defenses of Canada, Mexico, and
Speaker 2: the Bahamas. Northcom flear footage captured on a regularly shaped
Speaker 2: UAP flying across the southern US Mexico border. Infrared imagery
Speaker 2: revealed the object as modeled modeled. That's a mott led
Speaker 2: modeled with irregular hot and cold emissions, and its appearance
Speaker 2: was likened to a jellyfish or a floating brain with
Speaker 2: hanging appendages or technacal like features. I've seen this foot
Speaker 2: This footage does exist.
Speaker 1: Oh, this one does.
Speaker 2: This is the one.
Speaker 1: I haven't seen any of these.
Speaker 2: It's wild.
Speaker 1: So okay, is that a description accurate or would you
Speaker 1: say more of a squid because you know the things.
Speaker 1: It kind of feels like it could be a squid
Speaker 1: to a pot of some kind.
Speaker 2: Jellyfish or floating brain. Yeah, that's that's pretty spot on
Speaker 2: the report. Yeah, that's right, that does it right now?
Speaker 2: The UAP exhibited extraordinary behavior flying against the wind with
Speaker 2: no visible means of propulsion despite its organic jellyfish like appearing.
Speaker 2: The object displayed unnatural rigidity and its movements and flight
Speaker 2: path skimming geographic features with precision. At this relatively low altitude.
Speaker 2: The UAP closely resembles a class of anomalous objects previously
Speaker 2: observed near Department of Defense facilities in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Speaker 2: Now that's the video that's available. What was captured over
Speaker 2: in the Middle East. This US Mexico one isn't available.
Speaker 2: Oh okay, but you can find the Iraq.
Speaker 1: One right, same shape, Yeah, right.
Speaker 2: Wild. A compilation video on the US government networks sourced
Speaker 2: from DoD Force Protection and theater intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance
Speaker 2: assets includes footage of this event for comparison. So their
Speaker 2: comparison the one on our southern border to the one
Speaker 2: in the Middle East. The striking similarities suggest a recording
Speaker 2: pattern of encounters with this class of UAP in strategically
Speaker 2: significant regions. Now nickname the Jellyfish UFO, this UAP had
Speaker 2: a glowing, translucent structure with shapes, again resembling appendages, possibly
Speaker 2: caused by light or an electromagnetic glow. Witnesses described its smooth,
Speaker 2: jellyfish like movements that defied normal aerodynamics. Its silent flight
Speaker 2: and surveillance like behavior added to its mysterious nature. The
Speaker 2: US Mexico border, with its strategic significance in advanced monitoring tools,
Speaker 2: likely draws attention from programs like Immaculate Constellation, which started
Speaker 2: the ups. Of course, now this siting highlights border areas
Speaker 2: as key locations for UAP activity due to overlapping civilian
Speaker 2: and military monitoring. The object's behavior suggests advanced propulsion, possibly
Speaker 2: using electromagnetic or anti gravity technology. Its effortless directional changes
Speaker 2: and glowing appearance might result from ionized gases or even
Speaker 2: an advanced energy source, pointing to highly sophisticated engineering. Go
Speaker 2: out and look up that IRAQ one.
Speaker 1: I will definitely be looking that up immediately after this recording.
Speaker 1: It's wild. I like how it's looking at I could
Speaker 1: kind of calling it like a centry. It's surveillance.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, right, Sando centric, I get what you're saying. Yeah,
Speaker 2: what's it doing?
Speaker 1: The footage that we do have is that because it
Speaker 1: came from a non American side the footage, I wonder, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I don't know, you know what I'm.
Speaker 2: Saying, Sure what the source of that Iraq one is.
Speaker 1: Like, because like the if it was from a different source,
Speaker 1: it was leaked or air tight enough not to beat
Speaker 1: you know, just the classified right, So are classified? I
Speaker 1: mean yeah, I mean I'm curious if this one's available
Speaker 1: wine not the rest.
Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, well it must be that. Maybe you're right,
Speaker 2: maybe it did come from a foreign place. Yeah, because
Speaker 2: not much as getting out of this emaculate constellation.
Speaker 1: I mean, you saw the video, right, so does it
Speaker 1: look what does it look like? It's no, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: the camera like where does it look like it's coming from?
Speaker 2: Comes from up above?
Speaker 1: Want maybe or aircraft?
Speaker 2: I don't want to talk talk out of turn. But
Speaker 2: I want to say it was like from a helicopter
Speaker 2: or something like that that was observing this too. No
Speaker 2: sound because you would hear the engines. I will find it.
Speaker 2: I'll remind me to put it in the show notes.
Speaker 2: I'll just put a link in the I'll.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, that's that's probably good.
Speaker 2: Yeah, don't let me forget so picture of whiskey, I
Speaker 2: wrack the really fish. Okay, all right, so h Northcomb again,
Speaker 2: there's another north Common report. This one's called Supersonic Range
Speaker 2: Fowler Intercepts usn Fighter Okay. Flear footage and radar data
Speaker 2: document a supersonic UAP of unknown origin conducting a head
Speaker 2: on intercept of a US Navy fighter operating off the
Speaker 2: Eastern Seaboard. The UAP is first observed emerging from a
Speaker 2: cloud bank at high speed, rapidly closing the distance to
Speaker 2: the Navy aircraft. It executes a near passover the left
Speaker 2: side of the cockpit the US Navy fighter's cockpit, creating
Speaker 2: a dramatic and potentially hazardous encounter. Radar data from the
Speaker 2: incident provides key information on the UAP's speed, heading an
Speaker 2: elevation as it approached the fighter, and that's it. That's it.
Speaker 2: Now there does exist out there, and I don't know
Speaker 2: if this is the footed this one is talking about,
Speaker 2: this North Comb instance is talking about. But you see
Speaker 2: from a cockpit it's a propeller plane, which makes me
Speaker 2: think this might be different. But you see, coming from
Speaker 2: the clouds way off in the distance, there's this little
Speaker 2: dot and all of a sudden, this ship, this this
Speaker 2: weird like almost like an orb with wings, flies right
Speaker 2: by this cockpit and you see it as plane as
Speaker 2: fucking day. Dude. It's the wildest thing. But I don't
Speaker 2: know if this is it because like I said, that
Speaker 2: one had a prop a propeller. This doesn't mention if
Speaker 2: it had a propeller or not. So it says a
Speaker 2: US Navy fighter. I'm assuming a fighter wouldn't have a propeller.
Speaker 1: I don't know, four I assume yeah.
Speaker 2: But anyway, now this one's from South Comb. This is
Speaker 2: the last meter equipment. Okay, report Now this is from Southcom.
Speaker 2: This is called tictac UAP Detected Near vessel by Space
Speaker 2: Based Asset. Okay, See, this is what I'm saying with
Speaker 2: fucking drones in New Jersey, we have space based assets
Speaker 2: capturing this ship. Yeah, being cataloged and data clicked, and
Speaker 2: we can't figure out where these things are taken off
Speaker 2: from these drones.
Speaker 1: I really find it's hard. Yeah, just stop it. I
Speaker 1: don't understand. I can't imagine that there is no satellite
Speaker 1: pointing down on New Jersey from the first few reports
Speaker 1: that were legit and it's been over a month now,
Speaker 1: I mean by the time this comes out, like yeah, yeah, wow,
Speaker 1: I can't imagine there's not nothing like looking out like,
Speaker 1: come on, there is.
Speaker 2: We're not idiots, there is. There is.
Speaker 1: I'm on top. There's no way there's like five satellites
Speaker 1: look down even a four and said, like, what is
Speaker 1: happening with her? Let's just look at the coastline the
Speaker 1: whole time, see what's coming in and out. How do
Speaker 1: we not know exactly?
Speaker 2: Bullshit? Thank you? Bullshit? All right. So, Southcomb in case
Speaker 2: you didn't know, the US Southern Command is a unified
Speaker 2: combatant command within the Department of Defense tasked with overseeing security,
Speaker 2: cooperation and operations in Central and South America, as well
Speaker 2: as the Caribbean. Its area of responsibility spans thirty one
Speaker 2: countries and twelve dependencies or areas. Of special sovereignty covering
Speaker 2: approximately one sixth of the world's land mass. That's what
Speaker 2: Southcomb does. That all is that it is now in
Speaker 2: this one. Both overhead persistent infrared imagery and measurement and
Speaker 2: signature intelligence documented a tic TAC shape UAP fuck it
Speaker 2: UFO pass over an area of the Atlantic Ocean. The
Speaker 2: UAP maneuvers near local cloud cover, and its movements are
Speaker 2: accompanied by correlated electromagnetic signatures captured by other sophisticated sensors.
Speaker 2: In the available footage, the tic tac UAP rapidly crosses
Speaker 2: the field of view as it moves over the ocean.
Speaker 2: A vessel in the vicinity shows no observable reaction to
Speaker 2: the UAP, but its spatial and temporal proximity to the
Speaker 2: UAP's trajectory trajectory suggests potential fore knowledge of the event
Speaker 2: by intelligent assets. So worthy, I know, it's so worthy.
Speaker 2: So basically it's saying that, Okay, you know, all these
Speaker 2: sophisticated pieces of equipment captured this UAP shaped like a
Speaker 2: tic TAC, which we've seen UFO videos already, right for
Speaker 2: a few years now, These highly sophisticated pieces of equipment
Speaker 2: captured this tic tac ufo skimming over the Atlantic. But
Speaker 2: it also appears at the same time that this vessel
Speaker 2: knew it was going to be there, but no further explanation.
Speaker 2: Our asset, our vessel, Right, the US vessel knew that
Speaker 2: it was going to be there. Yeah, crazy, crazy, Okay,
Speaker 2: So that's the end of the mechanical data gathering of
Speaker 2: UAP phenomena. Now we're going to get into the human
Speaker 2: intelligence reporting, yes, or what the document refers to as
Speaker 2: defense human intelligence reporting. Okay.
Speaker 1: A shorthand of that is like just witnesses.
Speaker 2: High level witnesses.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but witnesses, I mean that's what it is.
Speaker 2: Well, the difference testimony, yes, but the difference is it's
Speaker 2: not average US citizen. These are.
Speaker 1: Witness I guess My point sorry, my point ultimately is
Speaker 1: that I know that there is like a level and
Speaker 1: there's like a weird thing going on here with this,
Speaker 1: but they're people just like citizens. Like it shouldn't make
Speaker 1: a difference if a homeless person or president saw it.
Speaker 1: They both saw it. They both saw it, you know
Speaker 1: what I'm saying. That's what I mean.
Speaker 2: I guess it.
Speaker 1: Shouldn't, right, But the boiled down version is just eyewitness testimony,
Speaker 1: Yeah right.
Speaker 2: So between so. According to the report and what was
Speaker 2: gathered from this human intelligence reporting between nineteen ninety one
Speaker 2: and twenty twenty two, the most commonly observed UAP shapes
Speaker 2: in the United States data set in this human intelligence
Speaker 2: data set included spheres or orbs, disks or saucers, ovals
Speaker 2: or tic TACs, triangles, boomerangs or arrowheads, and irregular or
Speaker 2: organic forms like the jellyfish, the brain right floating brain.
Speaker 2: Among these, spheres were the most frequently reported, while triangles, boomerangs,
Speaker 2: and arrowheads were the rarest. Variations in structure were noted
Speaker 2: across these categories, such as smooth, featureless spheres and those
Speaker 2: with protuberances, saucers with or without domes, and ovals ranging
Speaker 2: from smooth surfaces to those with visible structures. Unique forms
Speaker 2: like floating jellyfish or brains like we talked about, often
Speaker 2: with appendages and hybrids such as cubes with spheres or
Speaker 2: ringed saucers, were also reported. Spheres demonstrated high maneuverability and speed,
Speaker 2: with their diverse appearances suggesting multiple functions or technologies. Disks,
Speaker 2: the second most common, were reported in traditional biconvex forms
Speaker 2: and flat configurations. Oval or tic tac UAPs, often symmetrical
Speaker 2: or tear drop shaped, were rarely observed before two thousand
Speaker 2: and three, but sometimes included usions triangles. They're rare, They're rare.
Speaker 2: Were typically equilateral with occasional vertical stabilizers or elongated or
Speaker 2: isosceles variants. Boomerang and arrowhead UAPs, both symmetrical, varied in
Speaker 2: aspect ratios and wing shapes. Irregular and organic shapes, including
Speaker 2: shape shifting forms, were among the rarest and most complex,
Speaker 2: featuring dynamic projections or unusual combinations of geometric and fluid designs.
Speaker 2: It's weird. The range of shapes and features suggests a
Speaker 2: wide variety of missions, origins, and or technological capabilities unique
Speaker 2: to these UAPs.
Speaker 1: Right, Also, how do you begin describing this? How do
Speaker 1: they come up with that? The fluid thing? I don't
Speaker 1: even know?
Speaker 2: How do you?
Speaker 1: If I see this alien? That's all I got. I
Speaker 1: don't not normal, it's spinning, weird. What a shape is that?
Speaker 2: I don't know. I don't know what it is, but
Speaker 2: it's not normal.
Speaker 1: The rombus has nothing on that shape.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, they get really nitty gritty with this stuff.
Speaker 2: Which is cool.
Speaker 1: I like, that's cool.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it sucks to read.
Speaker 1: I want to try. I wonder how much how much
Speaker 1: of this is their training being able to describe these
Speaker 1: things as well as they have done, or if it's
Speaker 1: something that they get brief, debrief, debrief until they get
Speaker 1: it right, you know, trying to access these memories. I'm
Speaker 1: not saying through hypnosis or torture or nothing like that,
Speaker 1: but like being asked over and over again, being detailed,
Speaker 1: being able to ask the right questions to get these
Speaker 1: details out. Because I imagine that's probably the most likely scenario,
Speaker 1: because when you first see it and you start describing it,
Speaker 1: chances are you're not going to describe it as accurately
Speaker 1: as we're reading right now, right away, true, right, You
Speaker 1: probably spend a few few times on it, you get
Speaker 1: asked again, spend a day away from it, come back. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 2: I wouldn't know what to say, that's for sure. I'm
Speaker 2: with you, Yeah, all right. This first witness testimony is
Speaker 2: called close encounter experienced by CVN flight deck personnel now
Speaker 2: during night duty in the Pacific Ocean, again aboard a
Speaker 2: US Navy nuclear powered aircraft carrier. That's what a cvn
Speaker 2: IS flight deck personnel reported a close encounter with the
Speaker 2: spherical UAP of medium to large size. The incident began
Speaker 2: when a small orangish red sphere was observed maneuvering at
Speaker 2: high altitudes above the nuclear carrier. Moments later, the UAP
Speaker 2: rapidly descended to a position approximately one hundred to two
Speaker 2: hundred yards or three hundred to six hundred feet above
Speaker 2: the flight deck, maintaining altitude and matching the carrier's speed
Speaker 2: as it moved across the ocean. Personnel described being or
Speaker 2: experiencing altered perceptions of time during the encounter. The UAP
Speaker 2: admitted a soft orange reddish light that appeared intensely luminous,
Speaker 2: but strangely did not illuminate the ocean or the flight
Speaker 2: deck below it. Observers noted that the surface of the
Speaker 2: UAP was dynamic and resembled this rolling surface of the Sun.
Speaker 2: Despite its proximity, the UAP exhibited no aggressive behavior and
Speaker 2: maintained a steady position over the carrier for an indeterminate period. Eventually,
Speaker 2: the UAP ascended rapidly, disappearing high above the carrier. Witnesses
Speaker 2: reported feeling as though they had snapped out of a
Speaker 2: trance accompanied by a lingering sense of profound unease. They
Speaker 2: were scared. The incident report concluded by noting that the
Speaker 2: aircraft carrier did not respond to what some personnel perceived
Speaker 2: as a threat a hostile interception.
Speaker 1: Okay, the unease thing, because you get that a lot
Speaker 1: from testimonies, way before they started declassifying, like from from
Speaker 1: the first reports. Right, you hear that a lot, not
Speaker 1: every time, but a lot. Well, what do you think
Speaker 1: that is? The unease?
Speaker 2: So the first thing this made me think of, we've
Speaker 2: done a lot of research into Skinwalker Ranch. Yes, and
Speaker 2: we did what two episodes on that And the first
Speaker 2: time I heard mention of spherical UFOs in those days
Speaker 2: they were UFOs causing unease or terror among observers was
Speaker 2: on Skinwalker Ranch. I think the orbs were black in
Speaker 2: that case, I believe, with some sort of fluid fluidity
Speaker 2: to it, just like this, okay, and these people did
Speaker 2: it just gave this overwhelming sense of dread and unease
Speaker 2: and fear over on Skinwak. That's exactly what this reminded
Speaker 2: me of.
Speaker 1: I do remember that, remember that that that from that
Speaker 1: same episode the Juenta Basin, one of the people there were,
Speaker 1: and his mind urged not to go outside.
Speaker 2: Remember that, I do. I do.
Speaker 1: It was like a fear, a dread that he was feeling,
Speaker 1: and it's said to not go outside because something would
Speaker 1: happen to him. And he listened, but at some point,
Speaker 1: but that was after he had listened I think, or
Speaker 1: somebody else had listened to go outside and then come
Speaker 1: back in and couldn't remember anything that happened to him.
Speaker 1: Remember that. It's like, I wonder if that's similar to.
Speaker 2: But to your point, what's causing it? Well?
Speaker 1: I wasn't talk about the uknies in general because it
Speaker 1: could be said that the un knees could be not
Speaker 1: that this alien stuff activity is nefarious. Maybe it's just
Speaker 1: more it's more common for humans or animals really in
Speaker 1: general to feel uneased towards the unknown. Right, Like when
Speaker 1: you when you approach an animal that's not used to
Speaker 1: humans maybe or think like that, right, or a cat
Speaker 1: that's not used to you and you approach it, it's careful.
Speaker 1: It's first thing is fear or defense or anger. Right,
Speaker 1: common things that we do as well when humanity does
Speaker 1: the same thing, we destroy typically what we don't understand, right,
Speaker 1: or we fear it at the least, and almost all
Speaker 1: fear comes or all anger comes from some kind of
Speaker 1: shame or fear. So it's okay, I won't tell anybody.
Speaker 1: And uh and I wonder, so could that an ease
Speaker 1: be this or could it be that what it does
Speaker 1: to us like it makes us? Or could it be nefarious?
Speaker 1: I guess, I guess.
Speaker 2: I don't know. I'm kind of liking where you're going.
Speaker 2: It's almost like, yeah, existential dread.
Speaker 1: Yeah maybe yeah that's better.
Speaker 2: Like existential better. Like I what I'm seeing right now
Speaker 2: just literally shifted my entire worldview and I'm not prepared
Speaker 2: for that, and it makes me freak out sort of thing.
Speaker 1: Yeah, like a bad trip maybe, yeah, like you Yeah.
Speaker 2: Like a trip. I mean they said they lost time
Speaker 2: on this one.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, what will happen if you lost time
Speaker 1: to break out? You woke up tomorrow and it's two
Speaker 1: days later, you will I mean, maybe not that, Maybe
Speaker 1: that's that crazy, but yeah, yeah, it must be that.
Speaker 2: Man.
Speaker 1: I wonder if it's just a natural response as opposed
Speaker 1: to something that we actually should be hearing. I mean
Speaker 1: maybe both. Yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 2: I've never been in this situation. I couldn't.
Speaker 1: I don't know, knock on Woody or not. I guess
Speaker 1: that'll be a big fear for you.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I hate those little green bastards. But tell me
Speaker 2: everything I want to know. I do want to know.
Speaker 2: This one's pretty cool. This one is called and we're
Speaker 2: still again on human intelligence reports. Metallic orbs intercept F
Speaker 2: twenty two during continental United States air surveillance mission. While
Speaker 2: conducting a routine airspace surveillance and control control mission in
Speaker 2: the Eastern Air Defense Sector, an F twenty two Raptor
Speaker 2: pilot encountered multiple unidentified anomaloust phenomenon at mission altitude. The
Speaker 2: pilot observed several metallic orbs, each slightly smaller than a sedan,
Speaker 2: hovering in place. As the F twenty two moved to intercept,
Speaker 2: a smaller group of these orbs accelerated rapidly towards the
Speaker 2: aircraft despite their presumed hostile intent. The pilot was unable
Speaker 2: to establish radar locks on the UAPs, so he was
Speaker 2: going to fire, but his radar went lock.
Speaker 1: Wow, because of its quickness or something else, probably something else,
Speaker 1: something technologically that we just couldn't. It was too sophisticated
Speaker 1: right for us.
Speaker 2: Now. As this situation escalated, the F twenty two was
Speaker 2: intercepted and surrounded by approximately three to six metallic orbs.
Speaker 2: The orb maneuvered within twelve meters of the cockpit, positioning
Speaker 2: itself starboard from the cockpit. From the aircraft, it maintained
Speaker 2: a fixed spatial orientation relative to the F twenty two,
Speaker 2: precisely mirroring its movements and maintaining its position despite the
Speaker 2: pilot's attempts to evade using multiple rolls and maneuvers. The
Speaker 2: UAP formation boxed in the F twenty two and forced
Speaker 2: it to abandon its mission area. Under the apparent escort
Speaker 2: of the metallic orbs. The F twenty two exited the
Speaker 2: operational zone, unable to re engage or resume its mission.
Speaker 2: That's so wild now, just so you're aware, the F
Speaker 2: twenty two the Raptor F twenty two Raptor is widely
Speaker 2: considered to be an excellent fighter jet, often regarded as
Speaker 2: the most advanced and capable air superiority fighter in the
Speaker 2: world due to its stealth technology, high maneuverability, super cruise capability,
Speaker 2: and advanced avionics, making it extremely difficult to detect and
Speaker 2: engage in combat. The orbs were able to easily, easily
Speaker 2: out maneuver and get the best of this thing, the
Speaker 2: most highly capable fighter jet in the world. Think about that.
Speaker 1: It does seem like a great, non harmful way, almost
Speaker 1: like Gandhi esque way to like get this guy out
Speaker 1: of their territory, like instead of engaging with this thing,
Speaker 1: killing the pilot or whatever, like just freaking the funk
Speaker 1: out to leave the area where we're doing something, or
Speaker 1: then we don't want them to see what we're doing,
Speaker 1: you know, it's one way to do It's almost like
Speaker 1: when you're when you're older brother or whatever, do you know,
Speaker 1: starts copying what you say just to annoy you. There's
Speaker 1: nothing you can say. Anything you say, it's come back
Speaker 1: to you. It's like a harmless danger or's harmless fun,
Speaker 1: you know, harmless way to get someone at you or
Speaker 1: get someone mad at you. Yeah, it feels like that
Speaker 1: a little bit. It's kind of kind of nuts nuts.
Speaker 1: It also reminds me of this is weird, but this
Speaker 1: is alien in nature. Huh. Have we've seen an annihilation?
Speaker 2: We talked about this, Yes, I read the books and.
Speaker 1: The third and the third act of that of that film.
Speaker 1: Mattleie Portman's character makes it to the light house and
Speaker 1: she encounters a being the like the being before copying her.
Speaker 1: That's right, It starts copying her movements exactly follows her around,
Speaker 1: almost like playing with it, but also kind of like
Speaker 1: trying to understand the movements too, as the reminder of that. Okay,
Speaker 1: so I don't know why weird, but it's the same.
Speaker 2: Wow, Yeah, it's I don't know, I don't I don't know.
Speaker 2: I'm just moving on because what is there to say?
Speaker 1: We got breakfast.
Speaker 2: At some point, Yeah, UAP breaches perimeter of sensitive military facility.
Speaker 2: The next one. Yeah. At a military Eve airfield on
Speaker 2: the Eastern Seaboard, ground personnel reported a late night intrusion
Speaker 2: by a small, dark, spherical UAP flying at a low altitude.
Speaker 2: The object exhibited visual signature management, appearing as a blurry
Speaker 2: sphere surrounded by distorted or bent light. The distortion created
Speaker 2: the effect of a heat, haze or misty aura radiating
Speaker 2: around the sphere. Personnel who observed this UAP experienced physical discomfort,
Speaker 2: including eyestrain, headaches, and an overwhelming sense of dread while
Speaker 2: watching the dark sphere. Dude, I mean skinwalker. Yeah, dark sphere.
Speaker 2: The UAP was first seen slowly crossing the runway and
Speaker 2: moving towards the sensitive area of the facility. It hovered
Speaker 2: briefly above a cluster of ground equipment before continuing toward
Speaker 2: a building within the restricted zone. The UAP floated near
Speaker 2: the building for a short time before abruptly disappearing. Ground
Speaker 2: personnel were unable to determine the exact duration of the encounter,
Speaker 2: but estimated it lasted between ten and fifteen minutes.
Speaker 1: It's a long time subgest an age, that's like compared
Speaker 1: to these things and how fast they're away from us
Speaker 1: after we assume do you okay, do you think there's
Speaker 1: a lot of I mean, we don't know. We never
Speaker 1: will know. This is all hypothetical. I mean I wish
Speaker 1: in my lifetime we could find out. But as to
Speaker 1: why they're attracted to military installations, both secret and non secret,
Speaker 1: I originally went with the thought that, well, it makes
Speaker 1: sense that's where all our most sophisticated aircraft carriers are
Speaker 1: weapons and the training and the weapons, so their curiosity
Speaker 1: makes sense for that, not to mention, they probably see
Speaker 1: us land there after spotting us in the air right
Speaker 1: in there, maybe as they're flying like, hey, what is
Speaker 1: that thing?
Speaker 2: Now?
Speaker 1: I'm thinking like this is weird? Um, could it be
Speaker 1: that we have we meaning humanity, has some of their
Speaker 1: compatriots in prison, so to speak, like we have things
Speaker 1: of theirs and they want them back, and this is
Speaker 1: how they're protesting.
Speaker 2: According to this panel, we have their technology.
Speaker 1: Because okay, so what if they want it back and
Speaker 1: we find out that's what they want? Would we give
Speaker 1: them back to them?
Speaker 2: No, we wouldn't. No, we would never. Really, I don't
Speaker 2: think we would. I mean, would you view us as
Speaker 2: two stuff if you're.
Speaker 1: In charge, would you? I mean if yeah, I don't know,
Speaker 1: maybe yes, I mean, because we don't know what they'll do.
Speaker 2: As long as they teach us the technology, then here.
Speaker 1: They don't have to I don't have we stole it.
Speaker 1: We don't have to do anything. I would want them
Speaker 1: to teaching the rig of your neighbor. And then when
Speaker 1: they ask for it back, you're like, I need ten
Speaker 1: box so you can borrow it. That's what you're saying.
Speaker 2: I don't like that, motherfucker, that's what you're saying, right.
Speaker 2: I would want to know how the ship works, then
Speaker 2: here taking craft back them there.
Speaker 1: That's that's very selfish or I mean, I mean it's
Speaker 1: very American. But even in this hypothetical where you would
Speaker 1: be in charge, you wouldn't give it back film.
Speaker 2: I don't think so. I would want to know because
Speaker 2: I think.
Speaker 1: I would, because I think I think a good relationship.
Speaker 1: And you know, despite curiosity and how much time we've
Speaker 1: had with this material decades in our laboratories, I think
Speaker 1: it's a good friendship, especially of this caliber, it's much
Speaker 1: more important, I don't know, much more important. I'm trying
Speaker 1: to think long term here. This is long free energy
Speaker 1: is something we have no idea. I would want to
Speaker 1: have no idea, and plus we would never implement it.
Speaker 1: We had it, we would have done it.
Speaker 2: I would want to know how their technology works then
Speaker 2: they could have it back.
Speaker 1: I would. I wouldn't would. I wouldn't sacrifice a potential
Speaker 1: truth or a good relationship with beings that can completely
Speaker 1: probably destroy us. Since they get mad they found us
Speaker 1: in a probably in our home turf. Why would I
Speaker 1: jeopardize that?
Speaker 2: Well, they haven't done it for a reason. I don't know. No,
Speaker 2: I haven't annihilator, and.
Speaker 1: So far the only thing they got going we got
Speaker 1: going for us is that we're too ignorant to know
Speaker 1: what they want yet, or that might be the only
Speaker 1: thing that's saving us.
Speaker 2: Maybe we do know what they want, we just were
Speaker 2: too low on the total poll to know.
Speaker 1: Oh, that's also possible. You're right, you're right. They could
Speaker 1: have had that whole mound CINAI thing we mentioned, and
Speaker 1: then close encounters. Right, that's the government talking to the aliens, right,
Speaker 1: they set up a whole language with lights. You're right,
Speaker 1: I could have happened.
Speaker 2: There was an exchange program, right right.
Speaker 1: That could have happened. You're right, in but I feel
Speaker 1: like that's less likely.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 1: I want to know, Yeah.
Speaker 2: I want to know. All right, So after reading all
Speaker 2: of these just incredible sci fi like reports of intense
Speaker 2: UAP activity, we could make some general conclusions about them.
Speaker 2: The reported observations mentioned in the Immaculate Consolation document describe
Speaker 2: unidentified objects exhibiting advanced flight and maneuvering capabilities that challenge
Speaker 2: are conventional dynamics and known technology. The object's demonstrated intelligent
Speaker 2: behavior potentially autonomous or non human controlled behavior. For example,
Speaker 2: by interacting with that F twenty two Raptor fighter jet,
Speaker 2: which shows highly superior propulsion and maneuverability systems. The object's movements,
Speaker 2: including rapid descents, controlled stops, and hovering defiance of gravity
Speaker 2: suggests the use of fundamentally different technological paradigms, possibly inertialless
Speaker 2: motion or manipulation of gravitational and electronic electromagnetic fields, kind
Speaker 2: of like what you were talking before about the gravitational stuff.
Speaker 2: As far as I know, just me and the lowly
Speaker 2: man on the tootem pole here, humanity simply doesn't have
Speaker 2: these capabilities. Additionally, the orbs that were observed displayed seamless
Speaker 2: transition between a quad in aerial environments, highlighting sophisticated engineering
Speaker 2: capable of overcoming challenges such as drag, structural stress, and
Speaker 2: propulsion across mediums. We call this ability to seamlessly transition
Speaker 2: between the air and water and vice versa trans medium capabilities.
Speaker 2: In other words, the ability to transition from air to
Speaker 2: submerged and vice versa without literally tearing the vehicle in
Speaker 2: its occupants to shreds. Again, as far as I know,
Speaker 2: we humans don't have that capability.
Speaker 1: Well, if they're bending gravity, it doesn't matter. There's a
Speaker 1: layer around the spacecraft where the gravity is being bent
Speaker 1: to their will. Whether, of course nothing out on the
Speaker 1: outside would do any difference. Yeah, they probably don't even
Speaker 1: breathe what we breathe, you know, wow, But it wouldn't
Speaker 1: matter to them.
Speaker 2: It's wild.
Speaker 1: They're heading in the same direction regardless. They probably maybe
Speaker 1: you just solid things maybe, but something like fluidity, like
Speaker 1: something is easy traversible for them.
Speaker 2: It's got to be because it's their donate where us
Speaker 2: they would kill us and destroy us. The appearance of
Speaker 2: multiple orbs during an encounter further suggests potential for whatever
Speaker 2: this is to coordinate activity. All these phenomena underline significant
Speaker 2: security and scientific implications, including reconnaissance or interference, potential evasion
Speaker 2: of military countermeasures, and the existence of underwater counterparts or
Speaker 2: USOS unidentified submerged objects. These capabilities raise concerns about monitoring
Speaker 2: and defense, particularly regarding advanced technologies that can evade detection
Speaker 2: and operate across domains. Some recurring themes in all the
Speaker 2: encounters we talked about include intelligent behavior, advanced propulsion systems,
Speaker 2: seamless trans medium operation, and potential security risk, which emphasizes
Speaker 2: the need for further technological understanding and improve monitoring of
Speaker 2: both aerial and underwater environments. The general UAP observations found
Speaker 2: in the Immaculate Constellation document It outlines a variety of
Speaker 2: shapes and behaviors, including glowing metallic orbs and spheres, disk
Speaker 2: or saucer shaped crafts capable of rapid acceleration and silent operation,
Speaker 2: and triangular or boomerang shaped objects with unusual flight patterns
Speaker 2: often described as floating or gliding. Additionally, irregular or organic
Speaker 2: shapes have been observed that do not conform to known
Speaker 2: terrestrial design principles, for example that jellyfish UAP. The flight
Speaker 2: characteristics of these objects include abrupt directional changes, hovering and
Speaker 2: achieving hypersonic speeds without creating sonic booms. Our jets create
Speaker 2: sonic booms, these things don't. Many also exhibit advanced cloaking
Speaker 2: capabilities to evade radar detection, further complicating identification and study. Overall.
Speaker 2: To me, this is the frightening part. These incidents suggest
Speaker 2: the presence of technological capabilities far surpassing current human advancements,
Speaker 2: including propulsion systems without visible mechanisms, inertia, free motion, and
Speaker 2: seamless operation across multiple environments such as air and water,
Speaker 2: and potentially space. The observed behavior, such as interactions with
Speaker 2: military assets, precision maneuvers, and evasion of countermeasures indicates intentionality,
Speaker 2: either through advanced autonomous systems or controlling intelligence, likely non human.
Speaker 2: The origins of these objects remain unknown, with theories ranging
Speaker 2: from foreign adversaries, private entities, to non human intelligence or ets.
Speaker 2: As described in Immaculate Constellation, These phenomena underscore the need
Speaker 2: for deeper scientific investigation and increase transparency to address potential threats,
Speaker 2: enhance technological understanding, and safeguard national security. The ability of
Speaker 2: these objects to evade detection and operate with impunity suggests
Speaker 2: massive vulnerabilities in current military surveillance and defense systems. If
Speaker 2: these technologies are of non human origin, they represent a
Speaker 2: profound scientific and security challenge. If they're adversarial, meaning an
Speaker 2: enemy government, that could indicate an extraordinary leap in foreign
Speaker 2: capabilities and that's terrible for the United States. I know
Speaker 2: this has been a long episode, kind of a heavy episode.
Speaker 2: I want to wrap this up. Could we can go
Speaker 2: on and on about the things that were discussed in
Speaker 2: this bombshell hearing again, I suggest go watch the entire thing.
Speaker 2: But before we close, there was an interesting moment. I
Speaker 2: don't know if you remember this Oscar. Towards the end
Speaker 2: of the hearing, when Nancy Mace asked a really interesting
Speaker 2: final question of the four panelists, she asks, quote, how
Speaker 2: would you define non human intelligence? Non human biologics? What
Speaker 2: are we actually talking about? Of course, the answers were intriguing,
Speaker 2: and they were varied, and they were as follows. The
Speaker 2: first to answer was Rear Admiral Timothy Gldett. Remember this
Speaker 2: is the foreign Commander of the Naval Meteorology and ocean
Speaker 2: Ghinography Command and the Acting Administrator of the National Oceanic
Speaker 2: and Atmospheric Administration. These fucking people with their titles. Man, sorry,
Speaker 2: I'm trying. His answer to what non human intelligen rogence
Speaker 2: was quote, I don't think it's a stretch when you
Speaker 2: look at the diversity of life on this planet, the
Speaker 2: size of this universe to think that there would be
Speaker 2: more diverse, higher order non human intelligences throughout the universe.
Speaker 2: And that's probably what's visiting us. End quote. Okay. Next
Speaker 2: was Louis Alazando. Remember this is the To the Stars
Speaker 2: Academy guy with Tom DeLong, and that was the former
Speaker 2: director of a tip the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program.
Speaker 1: Which we mentioned on episodes regarding Aliens and the Triple
Speaker 1: Alien episode, or was that mentioned in the Skinwalker? I
Speaker 1: think I think of a skin walk very right. All
Speaker 1: these things pretty much connect a lot more than you think, right, Remember, folks,
Speaker 1: we've been on this case for years. Yes, on the record, now, yes, okay, continue,
Speaker 1: what do you say?
Speaker 2: So? His answer was, quote, I would take the scientific approach.
Speaker 2: The definition would be the ability to to react to
Speaker 2: a stimulus in a manner that requires an intellectual thought process.
Speaker 2: End quote.
Speaker 1: Okay that's pretty analytical, is that Spock? Yeah kind of
Speaker 1: Spock answer.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I would take the scientific approach. The definition would
Speaker 2: be the ability to react to a stimulus in a
Speaker 2: manner that requires an intellectual thought process. Okay, okay, thank you,
Speaker 2: Hi there buddy, all right there guy. Then came Michael Schellenberger,
Speaker 2: that's the investigative journalist. Yeah. His answer to what is
Speaker 2: non human intelligence was plain and simple. He answered, I
Speaker 2: just don't know.
Speaker 1: Yeah, quote that one.
Speaker 2: And you gotta respect that. No bullshit, no making something up,
Speaker 2: just I don't know, yeah. Fair. And finally, I think
Speaker 2: Mike Gold had the best response to what is non
Speaker 2: human intelligence? To question, Remember, Mike Gold was the former
Speaker 2: NASA Associate Administrator for Space Policy and Partnerships and he's
Speaker 2: the current Chief Growth officer at red Wine Space. His
Speaker 2: answer was, quote, I think we must be modest in
Speaker 2: our assumptions that we're looking for intelligence that could be
Speaker 2: biological and it might not. When Nancy Mayce probed Gold
Speaker 2: further about what he meant when he said non human
Speaker 2: intelligence might not be biological, Gold answered, quote, artificial intelligence mL,
Speaker 2: machines mL, machine learning, machine learner. We assume that all
Speaker 2: intelligence would be like us. Every time we look out
Speaker 2: into the universe, we're humbled relative to what we don't
Speaker 2: know in terms of forms of intelligence of what it
Speaker 2: may take. I can assure you I can't answer your question,
Speaker 2: but I think the ultimate answer is going to surprise
Speaker 2: us all best. I think that was the best. It's
Speaker 2: going to surprise us.
Speaker 1: It is a pretty good It also kind of creepy
Speaker 1: and a Steven Hawking kind of right, like his warning,
Speaker 1: yeah right, yeah about AI kind of feels like are
Speaker 1: we doing this so ourselves or is this another life
Speaker 1: form away from us? But machine learning in some passion
Speaker 1: like yeah, like they're transformers or something alien AI. You're
Speaker 1: transform Yeah, that's a race entirely made, not by humans
Speaker 1: or by a biological that's biology as machines.
Speaker 2: Ultimate advanced AI are transformers right right there. So let's look,
Speaker 2: he says again, I think we must be modest in
Speaker 2: our assumptions that we're looking for intelligence that could be
Speaker 2: biological and it might not. What do you mean by that? Then,
Speaker 2: the answers artificial intelligence mL, machine learning machines. We assume
Speaker 2: that all intelligence would be like us. That's the ignorance,
Speaker 2: the hubris of humanity. Everything's got to be like us. Right,
Speaker 2: every time we look into the universe, we're humbled relative
Speaker 2: to what we don't know in terms of forms of intelligence,
Speaker 2: of what it may take. I can assure you I
Speaker 2: can't answer, but I think the ultimate answer going to
Speaker 2: surprise us. All. Yeah, I love that. I think it's a.
Speaker 1: Great It is a great answer. I think they all
Speaker 1: had pretty good answers, other than maybe Alezanondo. He was
Speaker 1: that's just not alytical, but like pretty good answers. I
Speaker 1: have some important questions for you, Jack, No, no, no,
Speaker 1: not important like that your mind, But do you feel
Speaker 1: personally and for the show Supernancial Currencies Podcast. Do you
Speaker 1: feel vindicated? Vindicated in what we've been talking about aliens
Speaker 1: for years?
Speaker 2: Oh? Oh yeah, it's great to finally have it come mainstream.
Speaker 2: Like we're not tinfoil hat wearing motherfuckers anymore. You know absolutely?
Speaker 1: Did you have your doubts or were you always assured?
Speaker 1: And this just confirmed?
Speaker 2: I think I still have my doubts. Man, Yeah, I
Speaker 2: think I still have my doubts.
Speaker 1: Probably there. I haven't seen it because we know we've
Speaker 1: done so many shows on so many different topics. Yeah,
Speaker 1: would you ever consider, obviously I'm pitching in here too,
Speaker 1: if you want, uh, consider doing a pod cast where
Speaker 1: we take the terms, the events, the specific podcast topics
Speaker 1: that we've done in the past regarding aliens and match
Speaker 1: the descriptions we got from this the classification to those
Speaker 1: incidents we've reported before to see if any of them fit.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna need some AI to do that that research.
Speaker 2: I'm not saying we'll be cross referencing.
Speaker 1: But I think, hey, I think it'll put do is
Speaker 1: very interesting results. I mean from our top of our
Speaker 1: memories already, we've tied skin Walker.
Speaker 2: To this pass, the Jersey drone sight this right.
Speaker 1: That's already you know, without even trying to cover my
Speaker 1: mouth from that one. I mean, without even trying, we've
Speaker 1: already made a few connections to our own history on
Speaker 1: the show, which is less than ten years old. I
Speaker 1: feel like I think that might be worth looking into.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying for the next show, just saying it
Speaker 1: might be worth looking into.
Speaker 2: I like it, you know, it's.
Speaker 1: A it's a nice way to tie up our paths
Speaker 1: to the new future kind of thing.
Speaker 2: You know. That's awesome. Yeah, it's something we could look at, right,
Speaker 2: don't hold it, so don't hold us to it, listeners.
Speaker 1: But I'm not saying we should promise it, but I'm
Speaker 1: bringing it up.
Speaker 2: So we could work on It's an interesting idea.
Speaker 1: Just definitely want to bring that up because aliens is
Speaker 1: a big thing for us.
Speaker 2: It is. Yes, even though they mean.
Speaker 1: This is I think we're in the middle or at
Speaker 1: the beginning of the process of which something supernatural. It's
Speaker 1: just becoming natural, right. I like that we talked about
Speaker 1: that before then, the nature of the word supernatural and
Speaker 1: how supernatural is just something we can't we can't identify.
Speaker 1: We just don't know what it means. That's all it means.
Speaker 1: That's what science is. I mean, that's how they saw radiation.
Speaker 1: That's how they saw the sun at some point at
Speaker 1: something supernatural until they figured out what it was. That's
Speaker 1: what this is. I love that, and I think it's
Speaker 1: becoming natural.
Speaker 2: Love that.
Speaker 1: It's like the first steps. There's our version of the
Speaker 1: moon walking kind of first steps.
Speaker 2: Like Michael Jackson moonwalking.
Speaker 1: No, I meant that going on. Sorry, nineteen sixty three
Speaker 1: or whatever it was. It's nine.
Speaker 2: Sorry, my bad. Yeah, it would be fun. It would
Speaker 2: be fun, right, I don't know this is. And you
Speaker 2: asked me, do I believe? You ask me if I
Speaker 2: believe right or how I feel about it? And I said,
Speaker 2: I still kind of because I haven't seen it with
Speaker 2: my own eyes. I've seen ghosts, like I don't even
Speaker 2: know how many times, so I know they exist. I
Speaker 2: know that's right. I guess I haven't seen myself. We
Speaker 2: saw something questionable in the sky when we're out there
Speaker 2: in Nevada near Area fifty one and all that shit,
Speaker 2: but stuff like this what we reported in this episode,
Speaker 2: I've never seen it with my own eyes, so I
Speaker 2: can't say for sure that it's real.
Speaker 1: So what do you.
Speaker 2: I don't see why these people lie and the technological
Speaker 2: equipment can't lie. But I haven't seen it.
Speaker 1: Well, it's the difference between but you not being able
Speaker 1: to believe this because you haven't seen it with your
Speaker 1: own eyes, and something that you know of that you've
Speaker 1: also never seen seen, but.
Speaker 2: You completely believe religion. Right.
Speaker 1: I wasn't going there. Oh, I wasn't going there. Man,
Speaker 1: you feel in your heart you know it's safe something.
Speaker 1: But no, I meant something like I don't know.
Speaker 2: I don't know, I don't I don't know if I
Speaker 2: believe in that. No.
Speaker 1: No, something something that most people just take for faith that.
Speaker 2: Is real, Like I can't think of an example.
Speaker 1: Assisting chapel, Like is it actually there?
Speaker 2: Have you seen it? You know? Oh?
Speaker 1: I got you like other just pictures we created to
Speaker 1: kind of foolishly, you know. But that's that's that's harder
Speaker 1: to devil, that's harder to well, that's how people believe
Speaker 1: in flat earth, right, That's how people start believing in
Speaker 1: nonsense like flat earth, right, because despite all everything they
Speaker 1: see and everything they're told, they haven't seen it for themselves, right, Yeah,
Speaker 1: of course, so, and we call them ridiculous, right, and we.
Speaker 2: Should well deserved.
Speaker 1: I'm fine with that, but right, but what's the difference there.
Speaker 1: I'm trying to help you, convince you.
Speaker 2: I know you got me.
Speaker 1: I'm trying. I don't know, I don't know, and interesting
Speaker 1: to think about.
Speaker 2: These things are too big for my little mind.
Speaker 1: It is, no, it is. I'm not going to pretend
Speaker 1: that it's something I'm swallowing easily here.
Speaker 2: It's not. Well, what do you think after reading or
Speaker 2: hearing all these? Oh?
Speaker 1: Id? And I felt vindicated earlier in twenty twenty one,
Speaker 1: also a little bit after the original report, Yeah, but
Speaker 1: a little bit and what are there? I guess maybe
Speaker 1: I was feeling what you're feeling now. I wasn't totally
Speaker 1: convinced that this was enough, But this on top of that, Yeah, wow,
Speaker 1: it does. It does help me. I feel more vindicated.
Speaker 1: It doesn't change the price of gas or anything useful, right,
Speaker 1: you know yet or in my lifetime.
Speaker 2: But it's fun. But if we were we first engineered
Speaker 2: that shit, you'd.
Speaker 1: Get stop it. Stop it basically saying let's make enemies
Speaker 1: with people with a much bigger, uncus seeing gun.
Speaker 2: Oh man.
Speaker 1: But that's roughly all I got because again, this is
Speaker 1: a lot of mine. I mean, it's both. We could
Speaker 1: go into more minute ship, but I think we did
Speaker 1: a good job of that and anything big we kind
Speaker 1: of just did it now, and there's nothing bigger we
Speaker 1: can talk about because it's too big, you know, it's
Speaker 1: too much to wrap.
Speaker 2: I hope we were able to give a good digestible
Speaker 2: look at what this congressionally hearing exposed. And it was
Speaker 2: kind of rough getting through rough writing, but I hope
Speaker 2: everyone enjoyed it. And we have so many edits in
Speaker 2: this episode.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the optics is going to be fun. I think,
Speaker 1: oh god, do we have anything else?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 1: I think that's it for me, man.
Speaker 2: I think I'm gonna I want to wrap this up
Speaker 2: the way we did way back in the beginning with
Speaker 2: keep your head up, eyes open, and question everything. Oscar
Speaker 2: take us home.
Speaker 1: Okay, let's test you.
Speaker 2: Test these, test these one, two.
Speaker 1: Three question mark at Dane Lab. Is that what I heard?
Speaker 2: Yes? Listen, Oh we have to say happy New Year, listeners.
Speaker 2: I hope you're twenty twenty five isn't as fucked up
Speaker 2: as my twenty twenty four was?
Speaker 1: Is that how we're ye? Come on, No, no, let's
Speaker 1: not be negative, at least not too much.
Speaker 2: So.
Speaker 1: For X meths right, every X mess, my mom sends
Speaker 1: a text to the boy her boys, right, saying, all right,
Speaker 1: I need a list of three things from each of
Speaker 1: you for Christmas. That's how we do it now. It's
Speaker 1: been like that work like almost ten years or something,
Speaker 1: and they just stop trying to gas anymore, right, like this,
Speaker 1: tell me one or three.
Speaker 2: I'll pick one. That kind of thing.
Speaker 1: I obviously only send her legos, right, would I want
Speaker 1: anything else? I'm a big believer of Christmas not being
Speaker 1: practical at all. You just get something you want that
Speaker 1: you wouldn't get for yourself, for right, That's really why
Speaker 1: I think. And I and then when I walked in
Speaker 1: the house a few days later or a week later,
Speaker 1: my mom has tree set up, of course, all the
Speaker 1: presents or underneath it, and I completely tell not even
Speaker 1: by holding it, which said she got me from the
Speaker 1: box size.
Speaker 2: You know what it is?
Speaker 1: The random boxes?
Speaker 2: I saw it first of all. It's pretty impressive. That
Speaker 2: shows your level of dedication to lagos.
Speaker 1: Or my dorky make dorkness.
Speaker 2: But yeah, so which one is it?
Speaker 1: It's the Bumblebee transformer.
Speaker 2: Oh sweet, yeah, very nice. Three options. Did you put
Speaker 2: the new Millennium or the new death Star or whatever
Speaker 2: on it, or the Millennium Falcon anything? No?
Speaker 1: No, no, the most expensive one. I mean, I'm not
Speaker 1: gonna cripple them. Well, I'm not gonna do that, So
Speaker 1: I pulled. I did to three tiers. The most expensive
Speaker 1: one was at two hundred. No, no, it wasn't one seventy.
Speaker 1: It was the have you seen Dune the movie Doom?
Speaker 2: Yes, I like.
Speaker 1: Remember that they have a lego set of that seventy.
Speaker 2: It looks bad. It's probably once yeah, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 1: And it opens and like the wings go down and
Speaker 1: like it like it's like a settle down mode. And
Speaker 1: so that was one. The other one was a one
Speaker 1: thirty set. It was a Mario set. It's like the
Speaker 1: SNS Super Mario World. It's a Mario on a Yoshi oh.
Speaker 1: And it's like this high, like that wide, but that high,
Speaker 1: and it has a little crank. It looks pixelated like
Speaker 1: in the game. And you turn it, you make this thing.
Speaker 1: You turn it and it like hops like in the game.
Speaker 2: Holy shit. Yeah, so is it technic?
Speaker 1: No, but it is like a gear thing. It is
Speaker 1: very much almost like tech. I mean, yeah maybe, but
Speaker 1: they're not called tech. It's just a mark thing.
Speaker 2: Okay, okay.
Speaker 1: And then and then the Bumbob, which is a real transformer.
Speaker 1: It transforms like from the car to the to the transformer.
Speaker 2: Magine. So once it's built, you could transform it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, damn, I already have the Optimus Prime at home,
Speaker 1: and that transforms.
Speaker 2: You gotta show me a video of that or something
Speaker 2: that's pretty I've done.
Speaker 1: Take Oh, actually I can show you. I can send
Speaker 1: you TikTok now, I.
Speaker 2: Mean yes, it could be friends on TikTok.
Speaker 1: I re sent you a follow, I follow you.
Speaker 2: Uh, let me see. I'm gonna tell you right now.
Speaker 2: I do not know how to use TikTok. I don't.
Speaker 2: I don't, and I don't put any time into learning either.
Speaker 1: So Okay, it's a good show. That's a great ending,
Speaker 1: but it does it does use a lot of build up.
Speaker 1: It builds up a lot. It's a slow burn, but
Speaker 1: it's worth him that ending.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I like, I liked the show.
Speaker 1: One of the best and scary at Bad Guys is introduced.
Speaker 1: I think right after you stop watching, are you serious?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: His name is Lolo. He's from the Mexican cartel. Yeah,
Speaker 1: he is badass, dude. He's like charismatic and like serial
Speaker 1: killer like even though it's like cold, you know, like
Speaker 1: fucking ice in the veins kind of, and smart as
Speaker 1: fuck too.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Wow cool.
Speaker 1: So I went to Woodfield, right.
Speaker 2: God, what is that like right now?
Speaker 1: Awful?
Speaker 2: Yeah, oh god, it's got to be. It's awful.
Speaker 1: I went there. It's just too well. My brother invited me,
Speaker 1: and then I found out why he invited me, which
Speaker 1: is no big deal, we're brothers.
Speaker 2: Is fine.
Speaker 1: He invited me because he is on no sleep and
Speaker 1: he has to do some Christmas shopping and that's a
Speaker 1: far drive and he wanted me to drive also, I
Speaker 1: mean he wanted my input too to get figure out
Speaker 1: because I took my other brother as well, and we
Speaker 1: met up with Ashley and we took the deal as well.
Speaker 1: So it was like a little family brothers thing, okay,
Speaker 1: And and then we also have to figure out what
Speaker 1: to get our parents too, so I guess I was
Speaker 1: needed for that too.
Speaker 2: So it's all done. Everything's done.
Speaker 1: Yeah, He's gonna try to look for something else for
Speaker 1: my dad, clothing wise, from a cheaper outlet instead of
Speaker 1: like the high end.
Speaker 2: There to the outlet.
Speaker 1: Well, well, no, there's some outlets buy us and Rose
Speaker 1: mother's a big one there. That's he's gonna go there,
Speaker 1: I think tomorrow by himself, I mean after he sleeps.
Speaker 1: And so I ended up don in the driving and
Speaker 1: we found this great luggage stuff from my mom that
Speaker 1: was pretty cool on sale too. So and we went
Speaker 1: to the Lego store. And it was the hardest, hardest
Speaker 1: to resist the urge to increase my debt. I didn't.
Speaker 1: I did good for even a small one, which I
Speaker 1: really want.
Speaker 2: No, I didn't not.
Speaker 1: I help my composed.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you shouldn't buy stuff for yourself around Christmas. No,
Speaker 2: it's just that's the thing you shouldn't do. I know,
Speaker 2: and you didn't. I did not.
Speaker 1: I'm not proud of me.
Speaker 2: It's like a heroin Addic turned down smack.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I guess, or smackers though cereal. You know smackers
Speaker 1: is actually a gateway to real smack.
Speaker 2: That you're about to drop some knowledge on me.
Speaker 1: No, I mean I did no, not at all. No,
Speaker 1: you didn't know that.
Speaker 2: Huh.
Speaker 1: I'm trying to cram as much TV.
Speaker 2: As I can.
Speaker 1: In movies, I'm watching a movie a day. Oh my god,
Speaker 1: a new one, a new movie a day. I got
Speaker 1: to cram as much.
Speaker 2: As speaking of heretic was good? You liked it? I
Speaker 2: did like it? Okay, I liked it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it was good, very very nifty intellectual exercise. Yeah right,
Speaker 1: I like, how would you test someone that believes this?
Speaker 1: How would you test? How would and uh, what do
Speaker 1: you call this atheist? How would an atheist be tested on? Neither?
Speaker 1: It gets kind of cool thoughts. My biggest problem with
Speaker 1: the movie now that you've seen it, is that it
Speaker 1: I wish the entire movie he didn't ever have to
Speaker 1: be violent, like he would rely entirely on his intelligence
Speaker 1: and his reasoning skills, because that's what he's doing for
Speaker 1: to put these people in a in a and a
Speaker 1: moral quandary of their own making by believing these stupid religions.
Speaker 1: Like I wish he didn't have to resort to being
Speaker 1: a horror movie. Like it's so good without it, because
Speaker 1: it takes a long time to get there. Now, that's
Speaker 1: like the one thing I'm like, Oh, I just can
Speaker 1: you imagine that movie would have been my top ten
Speaker 1: if he managed to convince me of that, you know,
Speaker 1: to it would have been more challenging, but I think
Speaker 1: it would have been cooler if they pull it off.
Speaker 1: So that was like my one real regret.
Speaker 2: I could see that.
Speaker 1: But Hug was cool.
Speaker 2: He was it was And I liked the whole one
Speaker 2: religion coming before the other, and one religion one one
Speaker 2: story influencing the next story, influencing the next story, influence. Like,
Speaker 2: you know, we have Jesus who was virgin birth died
Speaker 2: on this day. Birthday was on this day, and we
Speaker 2: had this hawkheaded god from Egypt with the same story
Speaker 2: and blah blah blah blah blah blah. That's always very interesting,
Speaker 2: virgin mother, this whole thing. So yeah, I liked that.
Speaker 2: It was cool.
Speaker 1: I went to get my car fix finally, and that
Speaker 1: window was broken, not broken into, just like the motor
Speaker 1: on it stop boating from the cold last year. It
Speaker 1: took me a year to fix it. Anyway, as I
Speaker 1: went there, I saw I didn't pick it up. I
Speaker 1: was very tempted. I saw a Don Julio bottle in
Speaker 1: the snow in front of the mechanic shop.
Speaker 2: That's what I'm mechanics.
Speaker 1: Well, but not like right in front of the door.
Speaker 1: It was like by the curb and it was full,
Speaker 1: unopened and obviously in the weathers of the cold, like
Speaker 1: a hass shrubbery on it.
Speaker 2: But you think it fell out, I don't.
Speaker 1: But it was standing up on the floor. It was
Speaker 1: very strange. You should have grabbed it, right, But I didn't,
Speaker 1: jul Right, But I didn't, And I regret it.
Speaker 2: I regret I regret it. I regret my choices now right.
Speaker 2: He loves Demon Slayer and stuff. He loves that. His
Speaker 2: favorite character is the boars Head guy.
Speaker 1: Yeah, of course it makes sense, and he acts like Nico. Honestly,
Speaker 1: that's a really fucking animal. He literally is an animal.
Speaker 1: He's kind of an animal.
Speaker 2: Well, he's like a feral human. A few of his
Speaker 2: toys are over there, Yeah yeah, yeah, but that guy specifically,
Speaker 2: he's got a couple of so we found one. It's
Speaker 2: going to be from either the Elves or Santa, but uh,
Speaker 2: it's that guy who could remove the bars head. But
Speaker 2: he's sitting in such a way like he's posing like
Speaker 2: some sort of like Tai Chiese pose. Right, But he's
Speaker 2: fucking eating sushi. Yeah, And I'm like, oh, dude, we
Speaker 2: gotta get this. That's cool. He's eating fucking sushi.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he loves eating.
Speaker 2: Or it's maybe it's a dumpling or something.
Speaker 1: Maybe there's definitely those things he's eating the show.
Speaker 2: This is so wild. Yeah, we gotta get it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he eats a lot. He's he's like a feral
Speaker 1: warrior like he's kind of he kind of raised himself,
Speaker 1: kind of thing in the forest. He never knew a home.
Speaker 1: So when he was taken in by the Demon Slayer
Speaker 1: Society to be trained as a demon slayer, he's with
Speaker 1: the main group of people. You know, he's part of
Speaker 1: the he's part of the group, but he's he's crazy,
Speaker 1: wild man. He's not civilized at all.
Speaker 2: It's awesome.
Speaker 1: He's fucking running around jump climbing trees and buildings and
Speaker 1: ship left and right.
Speaker 2: That's great. Yeah good. It just makes sense why it's
Speaker 2: his favorite character. And he tries to tell me all
Speaker 2: about each character's backstory, and I'm like, all right, kid, okay.
Speaker 1: Yeah, hell yeah I could. I could also tell you
Speaker 1: all about him, but I won't bore you.
Speaker 2: I let you do that, right, Because now the situation
Speaker 2: has intensified. As I said on November thirteenth, twenty twenty four,
Speaker 2: So just last month, the House Committee on Oversight and
Speaker 2: Authority Accountability held a second landmark congressional hearing, again titled
Speaker 2: Unidentified Anomalist Phenomenon Exposing the Truth. During this second historic session,
Speaker 2: the committee once again unveiled alleged classified UAP research programs
Speaker 2: revealed previously hidden finding fuck, I want to start over.
Speaker 2: Another panel member was a Mike gold. Now, this guy
Speaker 2: was former NASA Associated Administrator for Space Policy and Partnerships
Speaker 2: and current Chief Growth. Thought, Okay, stigma combating the fuck
Speaker 2: Overhead persistent infrared imagery and Measurement and signaling. Oh my god,
Speaker 2: damn it, It's okay.
Speaker 1: It's just connected to the same edit, so no big deal.
Speaker 2: This stuff is so wordy, dude.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Overhead persistent infrared imagery and measurement and signal intelligence documented