Speaker 1: This is Dan Caples and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
Speaker 1: give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform. Once again, your
Speaker 1: state in the news today, President Trump doing oppressor in California.
Speaker 1: Wow a press conference. What a concept, right, And so anyway,
Speaker 1: he talks about how after he's elected he will begin
Speaker 1: his mass deportations in Aurora, Colorado, actually Aurora and Springfield
Speaker 1: at the same time. And then he also a word
Speaker 1: is that he's going to come and visit Aurora. So
Speaker 1: if we get anything concrete on that, we'll let you know.
Speaker 1: And I understand we're not a swing state, as time
Speaker 1: is precious, but that would get so much attention right
Speaker 1: in the swing states. He may very well come out here.
Speaker 1: So we'll keep an eye on that. You probably heard
Speaker 1: something in the national newscast at the top that you
Speaker 1: might not hear often where you hear an obviously angry newscast.
Speaker 1: Now keep in mind we have two newscasts. We have ABC,
Speaker 1: which is national and it's garbage, and then we have
Speaker 1: our award winning local newscast, which is always right on point.
Speaker 1: Now in the ABC newscast, what did you hear? You
Speaker 1: heard this angry national correspondent angry that Trump's telling these
Speaker 1: lies about they're eating the dogs, they're eating the cats,
Speaker 1: they're eating the cats, they're eating the dogs, and he's
Speaker 1: so upset about that, says it's causing bomb threats and
Speaker 1: everything else. Here's what he's upset about. What he's upset
Speaker 1: about is that whether or not they're eating dogs and cats,
Speaker 1: this story is killing Harris because what's happening now, it's
Speaker 1: gone viral right now. I don't know if you look
Speaker 1: at social but if you do, it's everywhere. And what
Speaker 1: you see is it's everywhere with young people on TikTok. Jeez,
Speaker 1: David made me send one hundred and ten young people,
Speaker 1: you know, let's say, twenty somethings on TikTok and predominantly female,
Speaker 1: and they're they're some He's done this mix of Trump
Speaker 1: saying at the debate, they're eating the dogs, they're eating
Speaker 1: the cats, and they've just turned it into a mix
Speaker 1: and then the people are dancing to it and mouthing
Speaker 1: the words, and it's getting millions and millions and millions
Speaker 1: and millions of views. Well, guess what, every time somebody's
Speaker 1: talking about this issue, Hey, are they really eating the dogs? No,
Speaker 1: they're eating the cats, but not the dogs. They are
Speaker 1: they eating the dogs but not the cats. No, it's
Speaker 1: the ducks, but not the cats, but yes, the dogs.
Speaker 1: Every time somebody talks about that, they're talking about a
Speaker 1: winner for Trump, which is the open border. Because the
Speaker 1: only reason anybody's eating cats and dogs, if they are,
Speaker 1: or chopping the heads off ducks, is because of the
Speaker 1: open border. And that is a winning issue for Trump.
Speaker 1: So that's why the ABC guy was so upset about it.
Speaker 1: It's a winning issue for Trump. So they have to
Speaker 1: make Trump stop talking about this. You know. What's so
Speaker 1: remarkable to me, and it was one of the missed
Speaker 1: opportunities the other night, but hopefully President Trump will take
Speaker 1: advantage of it now. Is when David Muir was doing
Speaker 1: his BS thing about and they call it fact checking,
Speaker 1: it's not fact checking. It's jumping in the ring and
Speaker 1: debating Trump because Harris can't win it on our own.
Speaker 1: And when Mers doing this stuff about, well, the city
Speaker 1: manager of Springfield said, nobody's eating cats, you know, but
Speaker 1: you know Trump obviously, and it's easy from the comfort
Speaker 1: of a radio studio show, But should I say, but
Speaker 1: you'll agree illegals are raping women and illegals are killing women, right, David,
Speaker 1: you'd agree with that. So whether or not cats are
Speaker 1: getting eaten, women are getting raped, right, And and that's
Speaker 1: all because the border's open. And so this is a
Speaker 1: big losing issue for Harris and this thing going viral. Man,
Speaker 1: that is so good for Trump. Eight five five forour
Speaker 1: zero five eight two five five The number text d
Speaker 1: A N five seven seven three nine. Colorado springs so
Speaker 1: beautiful this afternoon. It's kind of a perfect Colorado day.
Speaker 1: Let's go to Warren. You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 1: Welcome Warren.
Speaker 2: Hey, I've talked to you. This would be the last
Speaker 2: time I call you up and talk to you about Ukraine,
Speaker 2: because we've discussed a couple of times before. But the
Speaker 2: question is I mentioned to you last week or when
Speaker 2: we talked to eighteen twenty three, we had the model
Speaker 2: doctri well in the United States did not have the
Speaker 2: power to back it up in eighteen twenty three, but
Speaker 2: by nineteen hundred we did have the power, and what
Speaker 2: we did is we started a war with Spain and
Speaker 2: the kick them out of the cube when financially took
Speaker 2: it over and we went over the Philippine Islands more
Speaker 2: ae thousand miles away for interaction of the Philippines. Weren't
Speaker 2: forget well, thousands of Philipinos one of the runner all the.
Speaker 1: Country to put my friend Warren on hold. Not to
Speaker 1: be rude, I love Warren, but he and I have
Speaker 1: had this talking her before that I'd love to have
Speaker 1: this conversation with him off air where we could sit
Speaker 1: there for an hour or two and we could go
Speaker 1: through all this. But on talk radio it's not a
Speaker 1: format where we can go through this long historical prelude
Speaker 1: to them making a point. So I'll go back to
Speaker 1: our good friend Warren. Nice guy, Warren, what's your bottom
Speaker 1: line point? My friend?
Speaker 2: Point is that it's okay for us to have a
Speaker 2: mono doctrine. It's not okay for the Russians to have one.
Speaker 2: It's six thousand miles away from our coast. But it's
Speaker 2: not okay for the Russians to have one with a
Speaker 2: military organization right on their border. Warn't what They've been
Speaker 2: invaded seven times in the last thousand years. What's not
Speaker 2: I don't understand why they can't have something like a
Speaker 2: mono doctrine.
Speaker 1: Well, we're not talking Monroe doctrine. We're talking straight out
Speaker 1: of hell. Raping and pillaging of a nation. No right,
Speaker 1: they don't have a right to do that. Putin doesn't
Speaker 1: have a right.
Speaker 2: To do that, but we do.
Speaker 1: Oh, really, who are we raping and pillaging?
Speaker 2: Well? I was twenty four years old, nineteen sixty four
Speaker 2: when the London Johnson not a live guys involved with
Speaker 2: the Vietnam War two thousand miles away from our coast,
Speaker 2: which is no threat security threat to this, weren't.
Speaker 1: I've got interrupted here because now you're just now you're
Speaker 1: just I think, avoiding my question. You're saying that we
Speaker 1: did the same thing in Vietnam. So Putin rolls into
Speaker 1: he rolls into Ukraine and literally starts slaughtering the people.
Speaker 3: Was worse.
Speaker 1: Okay, Okay, appreciate the call. Worn eight f five for
Speaker 1: zero five eight two five five Again. I'd love to
Speaker 1: meet Warren and have this longer conversation. But the bottom line,
Speaker 1: and we're never going to agree, right. The bottom line
Speaker 1: in my mind is that Putin did not have a
Speaker 1: right to roll into Ukraine and start murdering, raping and pillaging.
Speaker 1: He just didn't. He just didn't. If anybody thinks he
Speaker 1: has legitimate CONSIRA security concerns about this, or that there
Speaker 1: are other ways to work that out, but mass murder,
Speaker 1: mass raping, mass pillaging, targeting civilian infrastructures, targeting hospitals. No, No,
Speaker 1: Putin is satan on Earth, Satan on Earth, and he
Speaker 1: should not be allowed to win in Ukraine. But at
Speaker 1: the same time, look at how Biden and Harris have
Speaker 1: botched this. No plan to win, just open ended funding
Speaker 1: and without what it's going to take to win. Because
Speaker 1: we all know I said it the first day we
Speaker 1: talked about this on air. Hey there should never be
Speaker 1: an American boot on the ground in Ukraine. But funding
Speaker 1: to help stop, Yes, that's appropriate to a point. If
Speaker 1: there is a plan to win, if somebody can come
Speaker 1: in and say, okay, I want to take one hundred
Speaker 1: or two hundred billion of your hard earned American tax
Speaker 1: dollars because we got to stop Putin. You got to
Speaker 1: be able to say, hey, that's a lot of money
Speaker 1: that could build a lot of schools and hospitals and
Speaker 1: do all sorts of good things here. So you've got
Speaker 1: to show me how that money is going to lead
Speaker 1: to victory. And Biden never did that, and Harris never
Speaker 1: did that. And we've all known from day one. The
Speaker 1: only way that Putin really gets stopped. Now, there'll be
Speaker 1: a deal at some point here, right, Trump wins and
Speaker 1: there will be a deal. But the only way Putin
Speaker 1: really gets stopped, if the Democrats intend to win this militarily,
Speaker 1: is for European boots to be on the ground. That's
Speaker 1: the only way Putin got stopped. And I'm not advocating
Speaker 1: for that. I don't want World War iie, but you
Speaker 1: can't sell people a lie. And if the whole idea is, oh,
Speaker 1: we're going to be able to stop Putin, you're not
Speaker 1: going to be able to stop Putin without European boots
Speaker 1: on the ground there because the Ukrainian people have fought
Speaker 1: brave and extraordinarily well, but they don't have enough. They're
Speaker 1: out manned. So unless these European countries are willing to
Speaker 1: put their boots on the ground, and there should never
Speaker 1: be an American boot on the ground, you're not going
Speaker 1: to defeat Putin militarily. Any idiot can see that. That's
Speaker 1: why this is a winning issue for Trump politically, and
Speaker 1: it's another reason why you look at the polls after
Speaker 1: that debate. Now, there's no way in the world he
Speaker 1: should be doing another debate with her and taking the
Speaker 1: attention off her record. That's why she wants another debate.
Speaker 1: She doesn't want this spotlight, this searing spotlight on the
Speaker 1: truth about her for the next fifty three days. No,
Speaker 1: she needs to focus on a quote debate. Let's go
Speaker 1: up to Beautiful Fort Couns. Talk to Bob. You're on
Speaker 1: the Dan Kapla show. Welcome Bob.
Speaker 4: Well, thank you Dan, thank you for the service to
Speaker 4: her cans Man.
Speaker 1: I do nothing but thank you.
Speaker 4: Well. I wanted to mention and I'm a little disappointed
Speaker 4: this failed Senate border bill and the response and been
Speaker 4: I think very poor by the Republicans to just point
Speaker 4: out some of the major flaws in that bill. In fact,
Speaker 4: I think it came up in the debate and it
Speaker 4: wasn't there was no response to it. Ye would do
Speaker 4: a great service to everyone out there if just a
Speaker 4: few bullet points were were broadcast about why, because all
Speaker 4: they wanted to do was blame it on Trump. You know, beautiful,
Speaker 4: that's true. It was a bad building game.
Speaker 1: You're one hundred percent right now. Let me ask you this, Bob,
Speaker 1: because I'm up against a heartbreak and the boss is
Speaker 1: literally sitting here, so I have to hit this break.
Speaker 1: But are you going to the game tomorrow night? See
Speaker 1: U C s U. I see your calling from Fort Collins.
Speaker 4: No, I'm actually not. Okay, Well, I'll be listening to
Speaker 4: it on the radio.
Speaker 1: It's going to be an amazing night up there, my friend.
Speaker 1: I'm so looking forward to it. I've not been in
Speaker 1: that stadium. I'm a longtime Buff fan. I missed my
Speaker 1: best friend's wedding to go to a Buff game one
Speaker 1: year when I think they were owing ten. But they've
Speaker 1: got a great stadium up there, a great CSU team.
Speaker 1: It's going to be an amazing night. And can't wait
Speaker 1: to get up there and going to go up with
Speaker 1: their daughter Caroline. Eight five five four zero five eight
Speaker 1: two five five. You're on the Dan Kapla.
Speaker 5: Show and now back to the Dan Taplass Show podcast.
Speaker 6: When it comes to the actual voting demographics and the map,
Speaker 6: the electoral map itself, where could Taylor Swift's endorsement potentially
Speaker 6: make a difference.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think young voters, young voters, young voters, it's
Speaker 1: a group of voters that Kamala Harris is struggling versus
Speaker 1: what you might expect from a normal Democratic candidate in.
Speaker 4: A normal year.
Speaker 1: So yeah, that actually on MSNBC. Glad you're with me.
Speaker 1: What an amazing afternoon. First, if you happen to be
Speaker 1: in Colorado right now, maybe the nicest day in the
Speaker 1: state's history other than a snowy Christmas Eve, and on
Speaker 1: top of that great weekend of football ahead. But look
Speaker 1: at what's happening nationally. I mean, it's starting to sink
Speaker 1: in right now for the Democrats, it's starting to sink
Speaker 1: in that she's going to lose. And they've tried everything. Now,
Speaker 1: they deposed the democratically elected nominee, inserted her, didn't give
Speaker 1: any other candidates a chance. It's actually Biden who forced
Speaker 1: her on them, because Biden does not want the people
Speaker 1: who humiliated him and deposed him to succeed. And Biden
Speaker 1: knows everybody knows that any of their other candidates, Josh Shapiro,
Speaker 1: if he was the dem candidate right now, we'd be
Speaker 1: in a world of hurt. Gretchen Whitmer. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: any of these people be good presidents. They'd be bad presidents.
Speaker 1: I'm just being realistic. So Biden forces the worst of
Speaker 1: the Democrat alternatives on the party. They're stuck with her.
Speaker 1: They did everything they could, they were human shields for
Speaker 1: at the debate, and she still comes out tracking to lose.
Speaker 1: So it's going to be so much fun together now
Speaker 1: A little bit scary, right because Trump could still lose,
Speaker 1: but she is definitely tracking to lose. It's probably only
Speaker 1: going to get worse for them, assuming that Trump now
Speaker 1: runs a very good, focused campaign, and I believe that
Speaker 1: he and his people will not perfect what's perfect in
Speaker 1: a human endeavor. Nothing but watching them panic now as
Speaker 1: we head into these last fifty three days, watching them panic,
Speaker 1: knowing they don't have any cards left other than, you know,
Speaker 1: running Joe Biden out of the presidency and making her president.
Speaker 1: I wouldn't be surprised to see that happen. But now
Speaker 1: they don't have this third debate. Now they don't have
Speaker 1: the third debate, so she has no one opportunity to
Speaker 1: reach the American people and explain how four years of
Speaker 1: her would be different than Biden, which she couldn't do
Speaker 1: the other night, and that was her one big job. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so they don't have a debate stage to do that on.
Speaker 1: She's horrible obviously at interviews and pressers, so they can't
Speaker 1: roll her out there. So yeah, they they may make
Speaker 1: her president, but that carries some risk too, because come on,
Speaker 1: you know, Americans, I think across party lines, value their
Speaker 1: democracy and what just happened with installing her in the
Speaker 1: dark of night, that's the opposite of democracy. People know it.
Speaker 1: It's one reason she's lagging now. If they're to pull
Speaker 1: another maneuver like that, you know that that could backfire
Speaker 1: on them in a heartbeat. Also, if and when they
Speaker 1: make her president before election day, you know, at that
Speaker 1: point she's got to be more visible. She has to
Speaker 1: be more out there. That obviously doesn't work for her,
Speaker 1: which is why she hasn't been doing press conferences, interviews,
Speaker 1: et cetera. So they're in a world hurt and we're
Speaker 1: going to enjoy watching it happen, knowing that that, hey,
Speaker 1: we could still lose this country by losing this race.
Speaker 1: That could still happen, But right now everything looking good
Speaker 1: eight five five for zero five eight two five five.
Speaker 1: The number. By the way, you know all this, I
Speaker 1: am really looking forward to the day and I hope
Speaker 1: it comes soon. When the Trump campaign starts to run
Speaker 1: very heavily in the Swing states, this sound and it's
Speaker 1: a specific phase of life.
Speaker 7: Remember, age is more than a chronological fact. What else
Speaker 7: do we know about this population eighteenth through twenty four?
Speaker 1: They are still all right? That's all you need, right,
Speaker 1: What else do we know about this population eighteen to
Speaker 1: twenty four? They are stupid? So you've got so much
Speaker 1: of that to work with, and you just start running
Speaker 1: that on a loop because listen again, don't shoot the messenger.
Speaker 1: But I told you many many many moons ago that
Speaker 1: as I looked at the horizon, you know, there were
Speaker 1: a couple of concerning twists and turns out there. But
Speaker 1: the biggest of those would be Taylor Swift getting actively
Speaker 1: involved in the campaign. The endorsement. No, that isn't going
Speaker 1: to do it. But if she starts campaigning with Harris,
Speaker 1: doing free concerts in the swing states, going after that aggressively,
Speaker 1: that could make the difference, says tied to some of
Speaker 1: these swing states are going to be and just look
Speaker 1: at the explosion in voter registration you know since Swift
Speaker 1: started this business. So yeah, you know you can ignore that,
Speaker 1: write it off if people choose to, but at our
Speaker 1: own perils. So I hope the Trump campaign is ready
Speaker 1: to go heavily on that. Let me get to us
Speaker 1: some of our textures. Our texts are in fuego, as
Speaker 1: you might expect.
Speaker 7: Dad.
Speaker 1: The reactions to Biden Harris ved Trump tell the truth
Speaker 1: about Americans. No pole needed, silence for Joe and Kamala
Speaker 1: cheers for Trump. That from Alexa. Yeah, and this, if
Speaker 1: you haven't seen it yet and the sound doesn't do
Speaker 1: it justice, you'd have to when you get home. Look
Speaker 1: at the video. You have Trump walking into this firehouse
Speaker 1: in Shanksville, Pennsylvania for a nine to eleven commemoration the
Speaker 1: same day that Biden Harris did what you'd expect for Trump,
Speaker 1: big cheers, everything else. It's wonderful. But then when Biden
Speaker 1: and Harris walked in something I never would have imagined. Nothing.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is the sitting President of the United States,
Speaker 1: at least in name, and that the VP. They walk in. Nothing,
Speaker 1: not one person clap. Now one person reacted to the
Speaker 1: point Biden kind of put his hands up like what
Speaker 1: and Harris looked mortified. So yeah, it's worth checking out
Speaker 1: that video when you get a chance, because I think
Speaker 1: it's very, very impactful. Texter Dan Biden has so far
Speaker 1: gone cognitively. That's the only reason he put that Trump
Speaker 1: hat on. And again, if you haven't seen it yet,
Speaker 1: you've got to see this visual Joe Biden putting on
Speaker 1: a Trump hat at a Pennsylvania event, knowing that photo
Speaker 1: is going to go viral, right, and he's walking up
Speaker 1: the stairs of Air Force One carrying a red hat.
Speaker 1: Can't tell if it's the same Trump pet So what
Speaker 1: do you make of that? Other than just confirming what
Speaker 1: I've been saying for a long time. He wants her
Speaker 1: to lose. He wants the people who deposed him and
Speaker 1: humiliated him to fail. And here's a texture who disagrees.
Speaker 1: He said, Dan, I think you're nuts if you think
Speaker 1: Biden would rather have Trump win than Harris. I don't
Speaker 1: think he has as petty as you decide to proclaim
Speaker 1: him without proof. Wait a second, First of all, yeah,
Speaker 1: he's plenty petty, and there's lots of proof of that.
Speaker 1: But all the evidence you need is to know he's human.
Speaker 1: He's human, I mean, just any human if they're president
Speaker 1: in the United States, they've reached the pinnacle, and now
Speaker 1: this cabal has them by deposing them because they say
Speaker 1: that he's out of his mind. He's nuts. Yeah, you're
Speaker 1: going to want those people to fail. You're going to
Speaker 1: want to sit there in election night and say, see,
Speaker 1: they were wrong. I could have won. I'm the only
Speaker 1: one who's ever beat Trump. Is there anybody in the
Speaker 1: audience who thinks otherwise. I would love to hear, and
Speaker 1: love to hear what your explanation is. But then you
Speaker 1: get to the reality of Joe Biden. He is much
Speaker 1: such a small, little selfish man. He has been his
Speaker 1: whole life. Look how he used his own son as
Speaker 1: a bad man, collecting money from some of the worst
Speaker 1: actors around the globe. Now, if there's one person on
Speaker 1: the face of the earth who is going to want
Speaker 1: the people who humiliated him to fail, it's Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: So I don't think there's any doubt. Listen, if Joe
Speaker 1: Biden putting on a Trump hat isn't proof enough for someone,
Speaker 1: I don't know what else could be. But I think
Speaker 1: Biden will be able to do much more to help
Speaker 1: defeat Harrison. I expect that to and you're on the
Speaker 1: Dan Campla ship.
Speaker 5: You're listening to the Dan Kapliss Show podcast.
Speaker 8: Voters said they were glad she has a tax and
Speaker 8: economic plan, but they want to know how it will
Speaker 8: become law when Washington is so polarized. They know she
Speaker 8: wants to get assistance to first time home buyers, but
Speaker 8: doubted that it was realistic. And Jeremy, I ask you,
Speaker 8: is their answer Donald Trump? Because I guess I see
Speaker 8: the questions. I think there was only so much that
Speaker 8: she could do in that debate in order to be
Speaker 8: as effective as she was. And I agree there are
Speaker 8: a lot more questions. Of course, I would love to
Speaker 8: ask Kamala Harris about her leadership style and her plans
Speaker 8: and how she plans to execute. But are those undecided
Speaker 8: voters saying I'm going to stick with I'm going to
Speaker 8: kind of lean Trump here because I want change.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't get it. It is driving them crazy
Speaker 1: and funny for Mika to say, oh, she could only
Speaker 1: do so much and still be effective, right, because if
Speaker 1: she had tried to explain why four years under her
Speaker 1: would be different than the last four years, it would
Speaker 1: have been a disaster because she can't explain that because
Speaker 1: it isn't true, and she's just not that skilled to
Speaker 1: begin with. Second, if she had tried to explain what
Speaker 1: voters wanted to hear, Okay, why have you changed your positions,
Speaker 1: she wouldn't have been able to do it because she
Speaker 1: hasn't really changed her positions. So that's what Mika is admitting.
Speaker 1: If Harris had tried to do what she really had
Speaker 1: to do in that so called debate, she would have
Speaker 1: failed miserably. As it is. Okay, she got out of
Speaker 1: that night looking good to the pundit class and overall
Speaker 1: just just looking better in expectations. But she lost the
Speaker 1: race because she had that one chance, with that huge
Speaker 1: audience to go out and answer those two big questions
Speaker 1: that people have, and she wouldn't even show people the
Speaker 1: respect of trying to ask them answering. When she was
Speaker 1: asked a direct question, Okay, people better off now than
Speaker 1: four years ago, she dodged it, which is the ultimate insult.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you that I tried cases. I've tried cases
Speaker 1: for forty years. When a witness is asked a direct
Speaker 1: question on a key point and they won't even show
Speaker 1: the jury the respect of answering it, then they are done.
Speaker 1: They are toast. And that's what Kamala Harris did the
Speaker 1: other night. Eight five to five four zero five eight
Speaker 1: two five to five the number. But then we get
Speaker 1: back to if you want to talk about one dynamic
Speaker 1: on the horizon that could upset this clear tracking of
Speaker 1: Trump to victory. And if you don't believe me, there's
Speaker 1: a great CNN story out, great CNN story that documents
Speaker 1: from inside Harris's own camp how they believe if the
Speaker 1: election was held today, Trump would win. And that's why
Speaker 1: they really need this next debate that's not going to
Speaker 1: happen because it would allow Harris that one more chance
Speaker 1: because there's no other forum for reaching the number of
Speaker 1: people she has to as quickly as she has to.
Speaker 1: And even if she could reach them, you know, what's
Speaker 1: she going to do with that? But yeah, there's no
Speaker 1: other way to do it. So right now, what could
Speaker 1: change the arc for Harris? Well, yeah, as we've talked about,
Speaker 1: if they now decide to throw Biden out of the
Speaker 1: White House, install her as president, hope that jacks up
Speaker 1: the campaign. That might work, but it carries risk as well.
Speaker 1: The other thing is the Taylor Swift endorsement, because I've
Speaker 1: been telling you this for almost a year that if
Speaker 1: Taylor Swift the endorsement won't matter that much. But if
Speaker 1: Taylor Swift decides to go on the trail with and
Speaker 1: for Harris in these swing states, as close as those
Speaker 1: races may be, yeah, that could well be a difference maker.
Speaker 1: So I'd love your ideas on Okay, you know what
Speaker 1: what should Trump do about that? Well, we played the
Speaker 1: sound earlier. First thing is they need to start running
Speaker 1: on a loop in the Swing states. That sound and
Speaker 1: video of Harris saying eighteen to twenty four year old
Speaker 1: year olds are stupid. And that's a verbatim quote. It
Speaker 1: wouldn't hurt to start running that. But you tell me
Speaker 1: eight five five for zero five eight two five to
Speaker 1: five the number text five seven seven three nine, What,
Speaker 1: if anything, do you think the Trump campaign should do
Speaker 1: to counter that? Then I want to throw this out there.
Speaker 1: This this really surprised me. Happened a few minutes ago
Speaker 1: on CNN. They were running a they were running a
Speaker 1: piece on Harris, and then they decided to use an
Speaker 1: ugly picture. Now I've got to tweet this out. Have
Speaker 1: you seen this? Boss, Dave Tepper is our boss here.
Speaker 1: He's the program director. Ryan's pretending to have COVID, Shannon's
Speaker 1: doing the Bride the buff game. Everybody else has some excuse,
Speaker 1: so leaders eat last, right. So our boss is setting
Speaker 1: a good example by doing the show today, So thank
Speaker 1: you for that. I do not expect my key card
Speaker 1: to work Monday after this experience, but thank you for
Speaker 1: doing it today.
Speaker 7: Maybe here it's fun to get back behind the board
Speaker 7: man's where a lot of us Ready if people.
Speaker 1: Start right, thank you, because I mean learning the business
Speaker 1: the inside out. Yes, yeah, exactly have you seen this
Speaker 1: picture I'm talking about you? No, I heard you talking
Speaker 1: about during the break we're talking. You took a picture
Speaker 1: of the TV. You're so shocked by it. I think
Speaker 1: I'm gonna tweet it out. I'll describe it as best
Speaker 1: I can to people. Okay, Because every picture you see
Speaker 1: of Kamala Harris now anywhere, except maybe some something critical
Speaker 1: on maybe a right wing site, is of a beautiful
Speaker 1: young woman. And Kamala Harris is attractive. That's what you
Speaker 1: see everywhere. So why did CNN do this? They they
Speaker 1: made the decision. This didn't happen by accident. It wasn't
Speaker 1: some intern to run the single ugliest picture I've ever seen,
Speaker 1: And I'd want to try to describe it, but then
Speaker 1: it would sound as if I was being superficial. But
Speaker 1: just trust me. It makes her look makes her look
Speaker 1: about thirty years older. It makes her look very unhealthy, unattractive,
Speaker 1: the opposite of what you see now the debate the
Speaker 1: other night, she looked great, you know, physically, superficially all
Speaker 1: that stuff. So why did they do this to me?
Speaker 4: Oh?
Speaker 1: Yeah, I will, I will, I'll do a screen you.
Speaker 1: I'll text it to you right now, but picture it
Speaker 1: in your car and you've probably seen You've probably seen
Speaker 1: some critical website or something use one of those ugly pictures.
Speaker 1: Why did CNN do that? Eight five five for zero
Speaker 1: five A two five five text d an five seven
Speaker 1: seven thirty nine Dave. My belief is, and I think
Speaker 1: there's a lot of evidence to support this, that there
Speaker 1: are many people on the left right now, starting with
Speaker 1: brock And and Michelle Obama, but many people on the
Speaker 1: left who who use the Democratic Party as their tool
Speaker 1: to pursue all their far left stuff, who believe that
Speaker 1: if Kamala Harris wins, it'll be the worst thing to
Speaker 1: happen to the Democratic Party. I'm talking about the secular
Speaker 1: left that controls the party because think about what happens
Speaker 1: if she wins. She's going to be terrible. I don't
Speaker 1: think anybody doubts that she's going to be terrible. She
Speaker 1: doesn't have the skill set to be presentent. So you're
Speaker 1: going to be looking at four really awful years for
Speaker 1: the country, which means the Democrats get wiped out in
Speaker 1: the midterms House and Senate, and then the Republicans, who
Speaker 1: have great young candidates now lined up and waiting to
Speaker 1: run in twenty eight. Republicans then sweep into office in
Speaker 1: twenty eight and the Democrats are in big, big trouble.
Speaker 1: And the young talent the Democrats have right now is
Speaker 1: then on the bench for eight years. So I think
Speaker 1: you got a lot of Democrats, including CNN, who think
Speaker 1: a Harris win will be disastrous for the party. And
Speaker 1: here's the kicker. And if there's a flaw in the logic,
Speaker 1: somebody tell me they suffer all of that in exchange
Speaker 1: for what They're not going to get a scot disappointment
Speaker 1: in this next turn. There's not likely to be a
Speaker 1: sco disappointment in this next turn. Now, if Trump wins,
Speaker 1: maybe you get an older conservative who decides to bail
Speaker 1: then and let Trump fill the seat. You know, at best,
Speaker 1: the Democrats maybe so to my or decides to step aside,
Speaker 1: but I'm not sure she's going to do that. But
Speaker 1: they're not going to gain a seat. Well, well, this
Speaker 1: next term rolls out, so the Democrats are looking at
Speaker 1: a world of hurt if she wins. So I think
Speaker 1: that's why we've seen a bunch of really good investigative
Speaker 1: reporting on CNN documenting, you know, Harris's extremely radical positions
Speaker 1: and remarking on how radical they are, documenting, you know,
Speaker 1: how how she mocked a border wall, et cetera and
Speaker 1: now claims to support one. And then they run the
Speaker 1: ugly picture, and listen, you could take any of us,
Speaker 1: not Dave Tepper or boss who's with us today, but
Speaker 1: you could easily with me, and I think with almost
Speaker 1: any other human you could find a very ugly picture. Now,
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris would be a terrible president and has some
Speaker 1: ugly even evil policy ideas, but she is a very
Speaker 1: attractive human. So they had to go out of their
Speaker 1: way to find an ugly picture and Dave, as you see,
Speaker 1: I texted it to you. Have you seen this?
Speaker 4: I do?
Speaker 7: If I was to describe it, and I'll disagree with
Speaker 7: you if you are for her, this is not the
Speaker 7: most flattering. She's a lovely lady. It's your point, why
Speaker 7: this one? If I'm to describe this picture, seeing and
Speaker 7: used of her, I would say it looks she looks older,
Speaker 7: she looks old and concerned.
Speaker 1: That would be the two words I wouldn't ask old
Speaker 1: and you are that's the most charitable thing I've ever
Speaker 1: heard of human say. I mean, it makes her look
Speaker 1: extremely old, extremely to me unhealthy. It's just the opposite
Speaker 1: of what you see out there for her right now? Yeah,
Speaker 1: and look how big it is. It's not like they
Speaker 1: use some little picture in the corner. The picture takes
Speaker 1: up almost half the screen. So they wanted people to
Speaker 1: see an ugly picture of Kamala Harris. So you tell
Speaker 1: me when we come back, we'll go the phone lines
Speaker 1: and text. We have a lot to do. Why did
Speaker 1: CNN decide to do that? This afternoon you're on the
Speaker 1: Dankaplas Show.
Speaker 5: And now back to the Dankaplass Show podcast.
Speaker 9: Or do voters deserve to hear more about what she would.
Speaker 1: Do on immigration.
Speaker 9: Well, I think certainly it's an important data point from
Speaker 9: the past that tells you how unserious they are about
Speaker 9: solving the problem. In fact, they need the problem to
Speaker 9: get worse so they can keep campaigning on it. But
Speaker 9: I do agree that every election is about the future.
Speaker 9: That's why she talked about what she would do if
Speaker 9: a bill like that came to her desk.
Speaker 1: Yeah, boota chet. She doesn't want to talk about immigration. See,
Speaker 1: it is an absolute loser for her, right. So this
Speaker 1: whole business, now that's gone viral, And if you're not
Speaker 1: on social you may have missed this, But this whole
Speaker 1: business that's gone viral about They're eating the dogs or
Speaker 1: eating the cats. There's been a remix made of that
Speaker 1: from the debate. It's been set to music, and what
Speaker 1: you have is you have a lot of people in
Speaker 1: their twenties, primarily women, who are dancing to it in
Speaker 1: mouthing Trump's words through this remix. So it's gone viral
Speaker 1: and you just hear your ABC News repeatedly today talking
Speaker 1: about that story. It is death for Harris, because the
Speaker 1: border is death for Harris. Because anybody in the right
Speaker 1: mind knows you cannot leave our borders open. She has
Speaker 1: and we're paying the price in lots of ways, and
Speaker 1: so it is just a deadly story for them. So
Speaker 1: it's funny how these elections work, right, You get these
Speaker 1: things that pop up, you never see coming, and then
Speaker 1: they end up having a big impact. And the point
Speaker 1: being this, of course, that whether or not dogs and
Speaker 1: cats and ducks are being eaten, and I don't know
Speaker 1: one way or the other whether or not that's happening.
Speaker 1: The undeniable reality is women are being raped, women are
Speaker 1: being killed by some people who come through that open border.
Speaker 1: And so anything that draws attention to Kamala Harris and
Speaker 1: Joe Biden having that border open is good for Trump
Speaker 1: paid five to five for zero five eight two five five. Now,
Speaker 1: interesting thing, Dave, what do you make of this? And
Speaker 1: want to get to our fiery lines. But all of
Speaker 1: a sudden, now Fox is running to crawl saying President
Speaker 1: Trump has opened the door to a third debate, that
Speaker 1: there might be a third debate. So what do you
Speaker 1: think of that on a late Friday afternoon.
Speaker 7: I mean, he must just be getting some some information
Speaker 7: from from his camp that that there's value there to
Speaker 7: it because I understood why he would want to be
Speaker 7: done after that last one. I wasn't one who thought
Speaker 7: he came off great, So I you know, I would
Speaker 7: guess that there must be some some some folks around
Speaker 7: him that are saying, you know what, there might be
Speaker 7: there might be more to gain this time if we
Speaker 7: will go ahead and take a third one. That's that's
Speaker 7: the only thing I can think of.
Speaker 1: Write some advice, and I see your logic, and not
Speaker 1: just saying that because you're my boss, says, see that logic.
Speaker 1: That's fine too. I believe he's just pulling her chain,
Speaker 1: that he is just Trump pulling her chick, because I
Speaker 1: think it'd be the biggest act of political malpractice sense
Speaker 1: Harris picked walls for Trump to engage in a third debate.
Speaker 1: But so I think he's just pulling her chain. But
Speaker 1: I think we will find out together, right it. Hey,
Speaker 1: let's going to Michelle and Aurora. You're on the Dan
Speaker 1: Capitli show. Welcome.
Speaker 10: I am things to take a call. Sure this will
Speaker 10: kind of tie into the border situation that during the debate,
Speaker 10: Kamala Harris was acting like in an attorney, going after
Speaker 10: Trump and trying to you know, examine him or whatever.
Speaker 10: And she made a comment that I think a lot
Speaker 10: of people didn't really catch on. She made a comment
Speaker 10: about the January as they don't look everybody, just something
Speaker 10: at the Capitol, and that that was the worst attack
Speaker 10: against the United.
Speaker 4: States and civil war.
Speaker 10: She makes a statement on the eve of nine.
Speaker 1: Eleven, I missed that particular line there, Michelle. Yeah, listen,
Speaker 1: I think that that Trump turned and thank you for
Speaker 1: your call, Michelle. I think Trump turned the J six
Speaker 1: attack on her brilliantly. And listen, I condemned the J
Speaker 1: six stuff today. It happened, that's not the point. The
Speaker 1: point is he turned it on her brilliantly by pointing
Speaker 1: out all these people who flowed in through the border.
Speaker 1: Of course, lots of people come in through the border.
Speaker 1: They just want a better life. They're not committing other
Speaker 1: crimes here. But we still can't have an open border.
Speaker 1: But you do have plenty of people coming in through
Speaker 1: the border who are harden criminals. They're raping, they're murdering,
Speaker 1: they're doing other horrible things. And so I thought Trump
Speaker 1: did a perfect flip of saying, wait a second, why
Speaker 1: aren't you prosecuting those people? Why aren't you prosecuting the
Speaker 1: people who looted and pillaged our cities in twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: I think he turned that on her beautifully. Marty in Denver,
Speaker 1: you're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 3: Welcome my Dan quickly. I'm an old man. I'm a
Speaker 3: dedicated Republican all my life. I've got my red hat
Speaker 3: and everything optimist.
Speaker 2: But the question I want to ask.
Speaker 3: You, do you really think they will let Trump be president?
Speaker 1: You're talking about a rigged election election fraud.
Speaker 3: No, I'm talking about politically.
Speaker 1: Right, So are you suggesting that that votes will be
Speaker 1: stolen in the end or manufactured fabrication?
Speaker 3: I'm talking about Chuck Pugh Schumer and his he he's
Speaker 3: already got it out there to stop Trump from being.
Speaker 1: Oh oh okay, So you're talking about pulling a firteen
Speaker 1: fourteenth Amendment ploy post election to try to bank him
Speaker 1: from a se Okay, thank you, Marty, thank you for
Speaker 1: that intelligent call. Great Wight in the week I put
Speaker 1: nothing nothing past the left along those lines to try
Speaker 1: to pull that kind of legal, legislative type ploy. I mean,
Speaker 1: hasn't the Democratic Party already shown you in so many
Speaker 1: different ways during this cycle? How fundamentally undemocratic. They are.
Speaker 1: What could be more undemocratic than in the dark of
Speaker 1: night deposing the democratically elected nominee and installing somebody who
Speaker 1: didn't get a single vote without any chance for even
Speaker 1: other Democrats to be the nominee. So I wouldn't put
Speaker 1: any of that maneuvering past him at this point. Dave Tepper,
Speaker 1: our boss filling in today, Ryan, say a prayer for
Speaker 1: Ranius Covid. Hopefully he'll be better again soon. Thank you, Dave,
Speaker 1: really enjoyed it. Kelly, your human sunshine, thank you for
Speaker 1: being here and enjoyed this beautiful weekend. Join us Monday, please,