Speaker 1: Welcome to the three Stories version of the Todd Hermit Show.
Story number one, President Trump decided to lose to Rob
Reiner's ghost. Story number two, if these are our betters,
who are they following? And story number three, the Holy
Spirit will not let me care about race. Yeah, that's
gonna make some people angry. We'll talk about this with
the help of Bulwark Capital Management, Mill Your riskpodcast dot com,
and it's God Almighty.
Speaker 2: The Todd Herman Show is one disapproved by big pharma
technocrats and tyrant's everywhere from the highd Mountains of Free America.
Here's the Emerald City exile Todd Herman.
Speaker 1: Today is the day the Lord has made and these
are the times to which God has decided which shall live.
And President Trump made a weird decision to go out
to lose an argument with Rob Reiner's ghost. And so
this is really bothersome for someone who supports a lot
of what the President does and doesn't enjoy dragging the
president as it were. In fact, in fact, the way
this segment had been set up in show planning before
Boom Truth Social came was, we're just going to talk
about what CBS did with Erica Kirk. So I'll show
you this because this was going to be the segment.
Barry Weiss is now at CBS. Her company she built
very quickly the free press that really blew up really
quick into a one hundred million dollars or more deal
really quick on the subsack platform, and so she had
a lot of hook ups, et cetera. That's an interesting
thing because now she's brought into CBS News and there's
these big changes at TPUSA and Barry Weiss brings Erica
Kirk on, and it's so weird. It's a weird thing
that we'll talk about later. This sudden switch where Erica
Kirk and t TPUSA are now all in again on
backing the Israeli government when Chardi Kirk himself had said
he couldn't any longer. That's weird. It's worth discussing. But
the point of this topic was sort of an ambush
they did to Erica Kirk, and maybe she agreed to this.
So the guy asking this question here is the last
person to ever speak a question to Charitie Kirk.
Speaker 3: Erica, I want to tell you how much I appreciate
your calls for peace and unity, and I'm likewise horrified
by the people in my so called camp who were
cheering about Charlie's murder. I believe that they stoke the
flames of violence. But even worse is when powerful influential
people on either side of the aisle stoke the flames.
When they do it, the flames can become an inferno.
And this leads me to Donald Trump, the most powerful
and influential person on earth, who has more responsibility than
anyone else to put the flames out. Just last month,
President Trump called on six Democratic lawmakers to be tried
for sedition, which he clarified was punishable by death. He
then reposted a simple message, hang them. I think that
you've been making strides to bring peace to our country,
and that turning point has been asking Democrats to decry
the individuals who cheer for violence. I have and will
continue to decry them. But any good faith effort to
stop political violence must hold both parties to the same
standard and expectation. So in that spirit, will you condemn
the violent rhetoric of Donald Trump, the most powerful and
influential person on earth.
Speaker 4: I appreciate your question, you know, my heart, why would
I ever say yes, go murder? People. This is so
much deeper than just one I understand your sentiment, I do,
But this is also so much deeper than just one person.
This starts at the home. Okay, this starts with family.
This starts with a seed that grows and grows. You
can choose to have evil in your heart, or you
can choose to have light. What you consume and what
you absorb from the outside world will manifest itself. No,
I will never agree with political violence. My husband is
a victim of it. I'm a victim of it. But
what I'm trying to say here is that we can
blame everyone else. We have to look in the mirror.
When you become a father, when you become a mother,
how are you raising your kids? Are you taking responsibility?
Or are you giving them a device and saying go
down that rabbit hole?
Speaker 1: How about this? The President called out seditious acts, elected
members of Congress and former intel officials, former military leaders
telling our troops to refuse to carry out the orders
of the commander in chief because they might be illegal
and you might go to a Nuremberg trial. And there
was a whole setup behind the scenes with a website
already created for people like that, and I wish he
had in this set hang him. I wish you would
have said, put him on trial, Let the trial play out,
Let military justice reign. If you're going to bring in
the guy who'd been in the military and put him
back on active duty and try him that way, let
the courts play out, and then let them choose the punishment,
which could be hanging them. She could have said that,
I wish you wouldn't have done that. It's okay to
say about President Trump, I wish you wouldn't have done that,
and that's foul. But in circles in DC, there are
people who can't do that. They won't do that. So
what Erica Kirk's answer was mine, It wasn't really an answer.
Charlie Kirk never did that. He never shied away from
a direct answer. Now, Trump did something on true Social
which then made its way to Twitter and see me.
It's one of the most disgusting things I've ever seen.
It's also in a way funny because he lost to
the ghosts of an actor director who probably couldn't have
done well in a debate with Trump one on one
when he was alive, Rob Reiner. So I'll show you
this in a second. What Erica Kirk is talking about is, yes,
things start in the family and then your family changed
over time. Are you empty nesters? We's just my wife
and had the realization of the day, Wow, we're empty nesters.
How'd this happen? I see this snks up on people.
You probably have plans for retirements. You probably have an
image of things you want to do, and if you're
really good planners, maybe you've got that all laid out.
But in the behind the scenes, do you know how
much of your retirement AI is eaten? I mean, do
you know? Do you know if you're exposed to certain
industries and industry groups that are being consumed by AI,
or are you super overexposed on things that are way,
way way above value. For instance, if you had any
ETF involved in building your retirement portfolio, and you are
like the average person, forty percent of what you think
is your wealth is tied up in seven companies, six
of whom are way overvalued by any mathematical rating at all,
any mathematical rating at all. So let me make a
suggestion for you. Get with my friend Zach Abraham, chief
investment officer at Bulwark Capital management, and Zach will look
through your portfolio. He'll look through all of your accounts, liabilities, assets,
and those dreams, and he'll tell you if you are
over exposed to risk. Because risk management is Zach's jazz.
He loves that it is his gig, and they actively
manage every single portfolio which can reduce risk and volatility.
All of this is no obligation and it ends if
you choose to proceed. You might have that first conversation
with Zach and go. This guy noys me. I don't
want to work with him. Fair enough, no obligation, But
if you do decide you want to work together, Zach
will show you if he thinks you should move, because
if it doesn't think your move you should move, he'll
tell you stay put. All of it's free, no obligation,
easy to register for. Just go to Know Your riskpodcast
dot com Know Your Risk Podcast dot Com. Investment Advisory
services off through Truck Financial lcn SC Rich Investment Advisor.
Investments involve risk can are not guaranteed past performances and
guarantee future results Truck twenty five Dash three three eight.
So President Trump decided to go to true social and
lay out the knockout punch on a guy who's no
longer alive. Just pobble that body. And here's what President
Trump decided to type out review, I would assume and
hit send. A very sad thing happens last night in Hollywood.
Rob Bryaner, a tortured and struggling but once very talented
movie director and comedy star, has passed away together with
his wife Michelle, reportedly due to the anger he caused
others through his massive, unyielding and incurable affliction with a
mind crippling disease known as Trump derangement syndrome, sometimes referred
to as TDS. He was known to have driven people
crazy by his raging obsession of President Donald J. Trump,
with his obvious paranea reaching new heights as the Trump
administration surpassed all goals and expectations of greatness and with
the Golden Age of America upon us, perhaps like never before.
May Robin Michelle rest in peace. Number one. This is sick,
and it's disgusting, and its foul, and there's no defense
for it. And it's petulence, and it's juvenile and it's childish,
and you lost number two. It's not true that no
time are the reports that this had to do with
Trump arrangement syndrome. That never happened. What we understand is
that his son, who was in fact the tortured one,
who in fact had struggled with drug addiction and homelessness,
et cetera. He has been arrested probably will be charged
on this. So that never happened, that it was Trump
arrangement syndrome and everything, but sad thing in Hollywood's and
rest in peace is disgusting and I'm embarras that President
Trump decided to do this, even as I can back
his policies, but he said that Rob Reiner was tortured
and struggling not much, not financially, and if he wanted
to go direct movies, do whatever he wanted to do.
He just did another spinal tap and that didn't do well.
But he lost because in advance of this, Rob Reiner,
who hated probably every position held by Erica Kirk's late husband,
Charlie Kirk, was asked about Charlie Kirk and President Trump
in this post because of the virtue of the video
about you you're about to see or the audio you're
about to hear. He lost this round to a man's ghost.
Speaker 5: You first heard about the murder of Charlie Kirk, what
was your immediate gut reaction.
Speaker 6: To it, Well, horror, absolute horror, And I unfortunately saw
the video of it and it's.
Speaker 7: It's this, it's beyond belief what happened to him, and
that should never happened to anybody. I don't care what
your political beliefs are. That's not acceptable. That's not a
solution to solving problems. And I felt like what his
wife said at the service, that the memorial they had
was exactly right and totally I believe. You know, I'm Jewish,
but I believe in the teachings of Jesus, and I
believe in doing to others, and I believe in forgiveness.
And what she said to me was beautiful and absolutely
you know what she She forgave his his assassin, and
I think that that is admirable.
Speaker 1: Sadly, rob Rinder did not know Christ had not accepting
him as Lord and Savior, therefore is not with him
in the New Heaven and the New Earth. Well, unless
Jesus left it at the last moment said here I am,
which he could have done, but that would be the
only way that would be the case. But I bet
if he were able to, he would forgive his son
if in fact his son is guilty. President Trump can
do a lot of great things. He's not going to
apologize for this, and if he's asked to, he'll triple
down because one of the great deficits in President Trump
is once again, humility. Sorry, but he doesn't have any
I'm sad about this. And in a funny way, Rob
Winner Reiner from Afar one his one and only debate
with Donald John Trump. Sorry number two. If these are
our betters, who are they following?
Speaker 2: You?
Speaker 1: Ever heard those phrase, the phrase of abay or betters,
follow your betters. Yeah, it's a sarcastic phrase for people
who are bosses or elites. There are betters. That's not
the way it's seen in the eyes of Christ. There's
no servants, there's no masters. This is in the body
of Christ. We can't apply that to people who aren't
Christians because we can't expect Christian behavior out of non Christians.
And sometimes we get non Christian behavior out of Christians
even as they quote the Bible. That happens people are
fallen and broken. But if we're going to look at
our betters in society. Let's first of all, look at
what society presents as our betters. Who are our betters.
Let's look at this symptomatically. We have a Supreme Court
and the law of the lands. It used to be
that the Supreme Court was in fact the Supreme Court.
That's not the case anymore, because we've got some eighteen
hundred Supreme courts. Any federal judge at any single time,
in any region or state can stop the president from
doing something with an injunction. Therefore, we no longer have
a Supreme Court. But let's pretend that we have a
Supreme Court. Well, in fact, we didn't even have a
Supreme Court because those betters operate in public. We have
a secret court that operates in private called the FISA Court,
which would in fact have more power than the Supreme Court,
because the FISA Court was invented as a tool to
be able to break the law, to violate the constitution.
When you need the Constitution violated and you want to
make it all legal like, you go to the FISA Court.
So that's the better of the Supreme Court because they
operate in secret. In fact, when they did the Russia
Russia Russia hoax. They lied to the FISA Court, not
the Supreme Court, because you don't go to the Supreme
Court to get permission to go out and violate the
Constitution by spying on your political enemies and their families
in attempting to entrap them as if they were agents
working for Vlad Putin. So we don't have a Supreme
Court by virtue of all the district courts that are
in fact little mini Supreme courts, and then the Supreme
Court itself, which used to be the Supreme Court ain't
no longer because we have the Pisa Court that was
invented in order to be able to break the Constitution
that the Supreme Court is supposed to be one of
the tools used to protect that and to stop violations
of the constitition. Are we all clear? So there are betters,
So by virtue of behaviors, then who are our betters? Well,
people who get Vice Court's permission you can go and
spy on us. But then again they don't need Vice
Court's permission. They can deputize others to spy on us,
and that way they can go to privates entities, private
companies and pay for information about who your phone was near,
your device idea, where did it park, who did you
talk to, who's in your circle of friends, what's in
your social media profile, and if you've downloaded any of
these apps, those apps that you get access to your
direct messages, et cetera, what's in there and anyway they
can to get access to text messages anything like that.
They're just buying it. They're not spying, they're just purchasing it. Therefore,
those people are added to our betters because they're being
deputized on behalf of government to monitor us, to build
up this great, big surveillance web which is coming. All
the warning signs are there that it's coming, including digital
idea that they're cooking up, including some of the states
that are already on board with this, like the rule
following state of Utah that's all in unauthoritarianism, and their
so called governor, their Spencer Cox, he can't wait to
belly up to this stuff. It's so phenomenal because people
who are lds tend to be pretty conservative except on
the topic of government getting to do whatever it wants.
So our betters then get to spy on us. Our
betters then get to have access to every single dollar
we spends. But we don't get to look at, say,
for instance, the sex abuse slush funds that Congress has.
We don't get to know who got paid off. We
don't know get to know on whose behalf. That's invisible
to us. But the irs gets to look at everything
we did. I just wrote my check for my taxes
and I'm just looking through the lines. You know, we
itemize our things, and we've got business and individual income,
so I'm looking at this. It's forty pages. We have
to pay an accountant to create forty pages, when in fact,
we don't buy most stuff for the business with cash, well,
anything with cash in the business. It's all either a
check or a debit card or credit card. So we
have a paper trail for them. There are betters. One
of the things I want us to remember is our
betters are not our betters. There is in the body
of Christ neither servant nor master. That's true, but there's
also this fact they're not the smart people they want
us to believe. They want us to believe that we're
imprisoned by smart people that we can't possibly outthink them,
or better yet, use God's wisdom. God uses the fool
the simple things to shame the wise. We can use
God's words to remind ourselves that these people aren't our betters,
they just have bigger jobs. We're gonna go through three
examples here in a second, one from the supposedly Supreme Court,
one about the FISA Court, and one about what's coming
down from the people who consider us they're betters, our betters.
This comes out of England, where they are well down
the path to controlling everything you purchase and knowing everything
you think, because you're gonna turn it over to them
or you won't be able to eat. Does that sound dystopian?
Does this sound dystopian to you? That there was a
doctor who called himself Science Itself, who way back in
the day, and I'm saying way back, he decided to
take a people, a group of people who were getting
sick and call it a virus. Now, maybe it's a virus,
but there is also belief that it was not a virus.
It was related to lifestyle. Way too much partying all night,
many days in a row, way too many drugs, way
too many antibiotics to counteract rampant sort of interactions, sexual
interactions with others and way too much of that. It
made people very, very sick. And this doctor stepped in
and said, Okay, we're going to create a vaccine for this,
but right now we need you to take a drug
called AZT, which was so poisonous. The guy who invented
AZT refused to actually patent it, wouldn't do it. So
does that sound familiar, because if you fast forward to
the era of COVID, it was the same doctor and
in fact the same team, and in the movie are
much of the same team in the movie, Thank you,
doctor Fauci. You're going to discover some things about Fauci
you never knew, even if you're fanatic for this stuff
like me, based upon exclusive interviews and exclusive research. You
can stream this right now at angel dot com slash Herman.
That's angel dot com slash Hermon. Don't just watch, don't
just consume. Become an angrew Guild member, Angel Guild member,
and you get to vote for movies like this to
continue to get made. So this is Justice Clarence Thomas
and he is talking with Mark Elias. Mark Elias is
one of the most likely to abuse law. Law fair
oort guys used to be at Perkins Cooy, which disgraced
itself in politics. And Mark Elias is having this discussion
about campaign finance arguments with Justice Thomas, and we're to
believe that Mark Elias is a very very smart man.
Speaker 8: Just so I'm clear, is there any First Amendment interests
in coordinated expenditures?
Speaker 5: Your honor? I think that there is an interest, a
First Amendment interest in coordinated expenditures in two regards. Number one,
there is an interest. Any time any entity or person
wishes to make a contribution to a political committee, they
are making they are expressing First Amendment speech. They are
engaged in First Amendment speech. Buckley said that that that
that is satisfied by allowing them to contribute. So essentially,
these speech is in the first dollar, it is in
showing support that.
Speaker 9: For that candidate.
Speaker 5: And that's why the contribution limits could be thirty five
hundred dollars, because the idea to contributional the candidates. Because
though the donor is is engaged in First Amendment activity,
engage in First Amendment speech, it is essentially symbolic speech.
It's the act of giving money. So that's number one.
Number two, again, I think this case would be a
very different one if the as applied challenge, first of all,
if it wasn't as applied challenge, but second if it
was an ad applied challenge, where with the already wanted
was its own speech and it wanted to coordinate that
speech with a candidate.
Speaker 8: I still don't understand what you're saying. If the party
coordinates with the candidate and pays the bill, is that
speech or does that have a First Amendment protection? Or
is it simply, as you say, a bill paying exercise.
Speaker 5: It is speech. It is speech, and under Buckley, what
it is treated as is a contribution, and therefore, though
it is speech, it is subject to limit by Congress
on how much can be spent in engaging in that speech.
Speaker 1: When I tie the speak, my tithing is free speech. Wow,
freedom of association. Okay, it's speech. Money is speech, says
one of our betters, market Lize, and I love Justice Thomas.
I don't understand what you're saying. I don't think Mark
Elias understands what he's saying. What he wants is campaign
finance limits for the other side. Because the Left has
built up all of these NGOs who don't need no
stink in campaign finance because they use tax dollars in USAID,
and they have employee unions like the federal government employe
union like the teachers' unions that are not quote, campaign actors.
He knows that we know that God uses simple things
to shame the wise. Mark Olias, I see what you're doing.
I think, Justice Thomas's what you're doing.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: That's supposedly the Supreme Court. In reminder, we don't have
a Supreme court because we've got some eighteen hundred district
courts that are all supreme courts because all of them
can restrain the actions of the President the United States,
the only official in government elected by the entire country
of voters by virtue of the ol for College, but
the only directly elected office holder that's voted on by
the whole country, and a district court in some state
can block him. Therefore, they're also supreme courts because the
Supreme Court is not supreme. It's also not supreme because
of the presence of the FISA Court. So the FISA
Court was invented because sometimes the government wants to be
able to void the Constitution on issues of surveilling Americans.
This was sold to US as a foreign fis a
court to deal with foreign issues of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act,
so that we could violate the Constitution lightly. And then gosh,
it seems that all of a sudden, there's this happening
where they go out and they're monitoring foreign entities. But
look at this. They're getting the phone records of Americans,
the text records of Americans with whom Americans are interacting.
They're having that all brought in in this big web.
Oh gosh, that's too bad. So the PISA Court gets
to allow entities to violate the Constitution in advance of this.
It's almost like the opposite of prior restraint that legally
there's limits on what the government can do to restrain
your actions in prior to doing something. This is almost
prior permission. Well it's not almost. It is we give
you permission to the constitution. Representative Thomas Massey, who some
people can't stand because sometimes he argues to President Trump
called out Mike Johnson because Mike Johnson came in promising
FISA reform and they had one meeting with intelligence officials
and came back and all of a sudden, Mike Johnson
changed his mind, which begs the question, what did they
show him.
Speaker 10: I was ecstatic a decade ago when we got an
amendment pass to require a warrant, but somehow that got
stripped out.
Speaker 9: And it's kind of like Lucy and the Football and
Charlie Brown.
Speaker 10: We get so close, or we think we've won, and
then it gets pulled away.
Speaker 9: And I'll talk a little bit about the elephant in
the room.
Speaker 10: One of her colleagues here, who used to be for
Feiser reform is now the Speaker of the House and
cast the deciding vote against Feiser reform last Congress.
Speaker 9: We don't want to talk about that too much, but
I'm going to bring.
Speaker 10: It up because when he was asked why did he
change his position, he said he learned some stuff in
a skiff. Well, the skiff is like the magic room
where they go change your mind. The problem with his
story is I spent three hours in the skiff with him,
and when we pressed the CIA director and the Director
of National Intelligence and the head of the FBI, all
of them were in the skiff. Give us one example
where you couldn't have solved the crime, or you couldn't
have prevented some mass casualty event because of a warrant requirement.
Speaker 9: They could not give us a single example.
Speaker 10: The only person in that room who had a decent
argument about anything was a PISA judge who said, Ah,
you're going to need more skiffs somewhere if we're going
to review these, if we're going to have to review warrants.
And so it became a cost issue. But I thought
that was kind of lame. Going to cost some money
to follow the constitution?
Speaker 1: Wow, it might cost some money to follow the constitution.
Who are they following? There are betters? Who are they following?
Who are the betters of the betters? It seems like
I can see intelligence services the betters of the betters,
and they want access to every dime we spend. They
have it now, but then they want control. Look at
the model of what's going on in the UK. This
is a member of Parliaments making something very very clear.
Speaker 11: Digital ID treats every citizen as a suspect. It assumes
that the state has the right to look over your shoulder.
You defend it by severely limiting the power of the state,
not radically expanding it. Abolishing jury trials, canceling elections, implementing
facial recognition, and now this, this incoming dystopian future, must
be resisted. I will be holding my own protests against
this creeping move towards George Or's animal farm. I will
simply not comply. I will not be downloading a digital ID.
I urge other MPs to commit to do the same.
The solution is obvious. I'll just have to reinvest in
a Nokia preferred the simplicity of it. Anyway, The sound
people of great Yarmouth do not want digital ID.
Speaker 1: No one really wants it except our betters. There are
people who aren't bothered by young people have been taught
to be unbothered by being surveilled at all times. I'm
right now in the process of refusing to do very
simple things like cure codes. I refuse to normalize it.
I refuse to give Apple my face for face ID,
even though they keep spamming me because they also consider
so betters. But who are they following? That's the question
of our age story number three. The Holy Spirit will
not let me care about race. And I've determined that
this is a fact because no matter how hard I try,
and I try to put myself in the minds of
people who deeply deeply care about race. And if I'm
to think about it from a perspective that's say, non spiritual.
I think about it from a worldly perspective. I didn't
do anything to get the race I have. I was,
I was born, that's it. I didn't engineer that. I
didn't raise my hand and say I'd like to be born.
I didn't get to pick my parents. And for me, again,
from a worldly perspective, race has become color because effectively
there are two races. There is white and black, and
then white adjacent. And that's all very purposeful to divide
people along these lines. Now culture, Oh, okay, have that
talk all the time. You know, I'm fascinated by our
family tree to a degree, because we've got some weird
combinations in our family tree. John Wooks Booth is in
our family tree, and so Sir William Wallace. I don't
know that you can get different. In terms of Sir
William Wallace and John Wolkes Booth, I mean they both
took lives. Wallace in defense of his country, in defense
of his family, and to some degree for revenge and
also to kick interlopers out of his country. John Wolke's
booth on the other hands, was an assassin. There's a
bunch of other things about our family tree that I
find interesting. There's this long history of men in my
family refusing the correct path to financial stabilities, such as
college in some cases even high school, and yet they're
going out and making it. And that's part of a
family tree that I'm really proud of. But was that white?
And I know that there are people who've bought into
victim ideology and say, yeah, the only reason that happens
for your family is because of white power. If they've
been black, they wouldn't be able to do that. But
that's not the reason why I think the Holy Spirit
will not let me care about race. It has to
do with a prayer a guy taught us. It's a
pretty important prayer, this guy taught us. And I'll share
that prayer with you in a second. There's a lot
of prayers that go on in the battlefield. There's a
lot of prayers that go on after the battlefield, particularly
if you had a bad op. I never served, I
have friends who did. But if you had a bad
op or a cursed op and you lost, guys, it's
not just going to be the notification officers who go
and make the notification to the spouses, the wives, Hey,
your husband, the Navy seal, your husband, the Special Forces
guy or Delta Team guy, they're not coming home. Sometimes well,
every time, the team guys are in touch with that
family immediately and they're there to say, we will be
surrogate fathers for your kids. We will never leave your side.
That's part of the culture. My friend Tim kruk Shank
is the founder and CEO of Bone Frog Coffee. He
lost plenty people in the battlefield. He was a medic.
He was there to save lives. Didn't always work out,
and then he lost his wife a fifteen year battle
with cancer where Tim kept her alive for about ten
of those years because the doctors gave her a very
short time span and Tim refused to give up. She
got to see her daughters get into calling, she got
to see things. She got to take one last trip
to Disney World because she promised her young kid she would,
She flew across the country. It just about killed her,
but she lived. Tim has created a very special Bone
Frog bag. It's called Sisterhood. It's a tribute to the
wives of Navy seals and on the bottom of the bag.
There's a write up a tribute to his beloved wife Liz.
This is a lamenta coffee from the Terazou region of
Costa Rica. It's super clean, high altitude, one of the
brightest bright citrus flavors, fural notes as this little chocolate
finish to it. This is arguably the top one half
of one percent of all coffees and it is dedicated
to Liz. And when you purchase this, you will be
giving money proceeds ten percent of proceeds to the gold
Star Wives. Go to Bonefrog Coffee dot com slash todd
use promo cod Todds to get temper sent off your
first purchase, fifteen percent off subscription coffee, and a whole
bunch of Christmas only specials such as free shipping available
for you as well. Bonefrog Coffee dot Com slash Todd
promo code todd. The Holy Spirit will not help, will
not allow me to care about race. There's a prayer
that we don't often think about, particularly if we've been
Christians for a long time, particularly you come from a
Catholic background or a Lutheran background where or even I
think Presbyterian, where the Lord's prayer is repeated. And the
person who taught us the Lord's prayer was Jesus. He said,
pray like this. He didn't say only pray this. He said,
pray like this our father, and everyone does. You have
to do, King James, it's a rule when you're doing
the Lord's prayer, Our Father heart in heaven. How lo
be thy name, that kingdom come, that will be done
on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this
day our daily bread, and forgive us our trespasses, as
we forgive those who trespass against us. And lead us
not a temptation, but deliver us from evil. For Thine
is the kingdom and the power and the glory forever
and ever on men. What is God's will in relation
to race? Thy will be done, That Kingdom come, that
will be done on earth as it is in heaven.
What exists in heaven in regard to race, Jesus told
us there's neither Greek nor Jew. There's neither servant nor master.
There's no race. It's the body of Christ. No race.
Notes from people who are concerned about being deracified. And
this is the term I'm learning as I'm spending time
with followers and supporters of Nick Fants. I'd never heard
that phrase deracized. And there's a lot of people really
upset about it, seeing an entire culture wiped out, and
some of them raise it to the level of just
a mass wipeout. Some of them are metaphorical about it,
but saying, yeah, it's the ending of a race of
people by virtue of having children of people of another race,
or by virtue of replacement bringing in a bunch of
people until the country has changed demographically, that's happening. I'm
not concerned about the colors of the people who are
coming in. I'm concerned about their cultures. What are their cultures.
Do they have America's best interest at heart? Do they
respect our constitution in our system, or are they here
for money for handouts. I'm concerned about that, But it's
not the race thing. Culture. Absolutely, I want American culture maintained.
What is it. We guarantee the right to have life,
so you can pursue liberty, life, liberty, and happiness. We
protect your life so you have liberty to pursue happiness.
We don't have a government that provides things to you. Culturally,
it protects what God has given you, and it recognizes
these things such as the right to free speech, the
right to defend yourself, the right to be secure in
your belongings, as things given to us by God Almighty,
and they're not to be monkeyed with by government inalienable. Yes,
that's part of our culture. Part of our culture is entrepreneurialism,
voluntar exchange of goods and services for value, things of bartering.
That's our heritage. It used to be that our heritage
was unless it was vital to an American interest. We
didn't go to war.
Speaker 2: That used to be.
Speaker 1: Then we created the military industrial complex and now the
state pharmaceutical and insurance complex. A disease, everything needs a pill.
Every war needs American involvement in American money and American
blood and treasures. So our culture has changed. It's not race,
it's not color, it's culture. I care about culture. I
don't care about race, and I don't think the Holy
spirits can let me care about race, because in the
New Heaven and the New Earth, there isn't any race.
There's just the body of Christ. This is the Todd
Hermann Show. Please go be well, be strong, be kind,
and go make every effort to walk in the light
of Christ,