1
00:00:05,160 --> 00:00:07,599
Speaker 1: What is up, fellow Siko's I am BAF family coming

2
00:00:07,639 --> 00:00:09,960
at you with the one, the only, the certified, fantabulous,

3
00:00:10,080 --> 00:00:13,560
mister Grant Hughes. We continue our off season look aheads

4
00:00:13,599 --> 00:00:15,480
for every team. If you haven't done so already. If

5
00:00:15,560 --> 00:00:18,640
this is your first time listening watching us, subscribe go

6
00:00:18,760 --> 00:00:20,800
check out all of our off season look aheads. There's

7
00:00:20,800 --> 00:00:22,960
a playlist on YouTube. You could scroll through our podcast

8
00:00:22,960 --> 00:00:25,320
feed wherever you get them, and join our discord to

9
00:00:25,359 --> 00:00:27,120
come talk about these off season look aheads. The link

10
00:00:27,120 --> 00:00:30,559
to that's in the podcast and YouTube description. Before we

11
00:00:30,600 --> 00:00:33,479
hop into some Dallas Mavericks talk, Grant, do you have

12
00:00:33,479 --> 00:00:34,960
anything that you would like to get off your chest?

13
00:00:35,799 --> 00:00:38,520
Speaker 2: I'm just excited to see how we can get Kobe

14
00:00:38,560 --> 00:00:40,960
White and Al Horford onto the Mavericks like we have

15
00:00:41,039 --> 00:00:42,200
for every other team so far.

16
00:00:42,439 --> 00:00:44,399
Speaker 1: Here's what you do? You trade Cooper flag?

17
00:00:44,960 --> 00:00:46,479
Speaker 2: Yeah, that'll do it. So they'll do it.

18
00:00:47,039 --> 00:00:49,799
Speaker 1: This is the sort of the I don't know if

19
00:00:49,840 --> 00:00:52,159
it's defining, but kind of the off season shaping question

20
00:00:52,200 --> 00:00:56,079
I find myself asking and I wasn't expecting to ask it. Grant,

21
00:00:56,719 --> 00:01:01,320
does getting Cooper Flag change the haves his offseason approach

22
00:01:02,119 --> 00:01:05,040
at all, and it does change it, but to what

23
00:01:05,239 --> 00:01:06,239
extent and how.

24
00:01:06,959 --> 00:01:12,400
Speaker 2: So you your phrasing uses the word does, And I

25
00:01:12,439 --> 00:01:15,200
will say the answer to that framing is probably not.

26
00:01:15,920 --> 00:01:19,159
If the word word should. Should getting the number one

27
00:01:19,200 --> 00:01:22,760
pick change the Dallas Mavericks offseason plans? The answer is

28
00:01:22,799 --> 00:01:28,280
absolutely it should. It should change them, like thoroughly, Like

29
00:01:28,319 --> 00:01:31,079
there should be a complete reorganization of what you're trying

30
00:01:31,120 --> 00:01:33,719
to do as a team because you lucked into this pick,

31
00:01:34,079 --> 00:01:37,280
right like what Like, I just I think it absolutely

32
00:01:38,000 --> 00:01:41,000
has to. And like, honestly, if well, there's a whole

33
00:01:41,280 --> 00:01:43,359
road to go down, if like if other management were

34
00:01:43,400 --> 00:01:45,680
in charge, first of all, the situation would be different.

35
00:01:45,680 --> 00:01:49,560
But like if it were not the group that changed

36
00:01:49,599 --> 00:01:53,280
the team so so wildly by trading Luca, you would

37
00:01:53,319 --> 00:01:55,480
say like, oh, yeah, they're gonna just they're gonna totally

38
00:01:55,560 --> 00:01:57,599
start over, right like or something close to that.

39
00:01:57,719 --> 00:01:58,760
Speaker 3: But I don't.

40
00:01:58,799 --> 00:02:00,439
Speaker 2: I don't think that's what Dallas is going to do

41
00:02:00,599 --> 00:02:03,040
because because what so I know there's more to get to.

42
00:02:03,840 --> 00:02:05,920
What would it what would be the first thing you

43
00:02:05,959 --> 00:02:09,639
would do if you were like, you're what is what

44
00:02:09,759 --> 00:02:12,199
is bullet point number one on your off season two

45
00:02:12,280 --> 00:02:14,800
do list. If you're Dallas and you know you got

46
00:02:14,800 --> 00:02:15,759
the first.

47
00:02:15,520 --> 00:02:17,840
Speaker 1: Pick, trade Anthony Davis.

48
00:02:18,000 --> 00:02:20,879
Speaker 2: Correct, that is the only answer. I agree with you,

49
00:02:21,000 --> 00:02:22,520
and I don't think they're going to do that. So

50
00:02:22,560 --> 00:02:24,759
now we can move on. We can move to the

51
00:02:25,159 --> 00:02:26,439
next part of the run through.

52
00:02:26,520 --> 00:02:28,680
Speaker 1: Do you buy though before we want to get into that,

53
00:02:28,680 --> 00:02:30,240
I just want to get the Cooper Flag stuff out

54
00:02:30,240 --> 00:02:31,919
of the way element of it. Yeah, The reporting is

55
00:02:31,919 --> 00:02:33,759
they're going to keep the pick, which I think that's

56
00:02:33,800 --> 00:02:36,120
the right decision at least, and I'm assuming they will

57
00:02:36,159 --> 00:02:39,120
use said pick on Cooper Flag. Do you think is

58
00:02:39,159 --> 00:02:42,000
there like any player that would get you, as Dallas

59
00:02:42,000 --> 00:02:44,719
thing here that you could talk yourself into saying this

60
00:02:44,759 --> 00:02:47,560
will probably lower the bar bit. The Mavericks can say

61
00:02:47,560 --> 00:02:49,719
whatever they want right now, but Nico Harrison would definitely

62
00:02:49,759 --> 00:02:55,039
think about moving this pick for player What who I mean?

63
00:02:55,439 --> 00:02:58,199
Speaker 2: So you have to start with Giannis would spark a

64
00:02:58,240 --> 00:03:01,560
conversation even that that's kind of dumb because Kyrie is

65
00:03:01,599 --> 00:03:03,199
not going to play for most of next year, So

66
00:03:03,240 --> 00:03:04,280
what do you what are you doing?

67
00:03:04,599 --> 00:03:06,759
Speaker 1: And by the way, if you're not moving Kyrie or

68
00:03:06,759 --> 00:03:09,479
Anthony Davis, which I'm not, if you're trading Cooper Flag,

69
00:03:09,520 --> 00:03:11,599
you probably shouldn't because you're all in on Now how

70
00:03:11,639 --> 00:03:13,599
many players are you giving up to get Yannis then?

71
00:03:13,840 --> 00:03:16,199
And that's right, so Kyrie's out till January at least,

72
00:03:16,439 --> 00:03:18,800
and then you give it up four of your rotation

73
00:03:18,960 --> 00:03:21,280
players to get Johanness in there.

74
00:03:21,800 --> 00:03:24,319
Speaker 2: So but what about going the other way and like

75
00:03:25,360 --> 00:03:28,840
the Spurs or the Sixers say we'll give you our

76
00:03:28,919 --> 00:03:32,159
second slash third pick and a bunch of young guys,

77
00:03:32,919 --> 00:03:35,520
or there's like someone out there is willing to offer

78
00:03:35,560 --> 00:03:38,199
you a couple unprotected in the future, and it's a

79
00:03:38,199 --> 00:03:41,000
team that, like you, have reasonablieve shorting their future is

80
00:03:41,000 --> 00:03:44,599
a good idea like that actually, because of what you

81
00:03:44,639 --> 00:03:48,280
pointed about pointed out about any like high dollar incoming

82
00:03:48,639 --> 00:03:50,960
salaries like it make it would almost make more sense

83
00:03:50,960 --> 00:03:53,800
if you just you're not convinced Flag is who everyone

84
00:03:53,800 --> 00:03:56,439
says he is. You think the difference between the number

85
00:03:56,439 --> 00:03:58,520
one and the number two or three is not as

86
00:03:58,560 --> 00:04:01,759
big as everyone says it is, and you think getting

87
00:04:01,800 --> 00:04:04,599
more assets is the way to go, Like, I think

88
00:04:04,680 --> 00:04:07,159
that you could sell me on that a little bit

89
00:04:07,199 --> 00:04:10,400
better than you could on we think we're The right

90
00:04:10,479 --> 00:04:14,000
move is to go get Kevin Durant or Giannis or whatever. Like,

91
00:04:14,120 --> 00:04:16,399
it's just like not that any you'd ever trade number

92
00:04:16,399 --> 00:04:17,759
one for Durant, But you know what I mean, Like

93
00:04:17,759 --> 00:04:20,399
doesn't it would make more sense if you just differed

94
00:04:20,399 --> 00:04:23,639
from consensus on Flag and capitalize on that by getting

95
00:04:23,680 --> 00:04:26,879
a bunch of other young assets and draft capital. But like,

96
00:04:27,720 --> 00:04:29,920
I think the consensus on Flag is probably just right,

97
00:04:30,319 --> 00:04:31,800
So maybe you don't do that.

98
00:04:32,360 --> 00:04:35,079
Speaker 1: Is this what if Charlotte came and so we will

99
00:04:35,079 --> 00:04:38,639
give you LaMelo Ball an hour pick next year and

100
00:04:38,720 --> 00:04:42,560
your pick next year back for number one?

101
00:04:43,879 --> 00:04:46,160
Speaker 2: I think you got to think about that, right.

102
00:04:46,759 --> 00:04:49,040
Speaker 1: That you could say, your own pick plus what do

103
00:04:49,040 --> 00:04:51,759
they have this year? Number six? Five? What they have

104
00:04:51,920 --> 00:04:52,360
they four?

105
00:04:52,560 --> 00:04:54,279
Speaker 3: At Wow, Charlotte, that would be pretty sure.

106
00:04:54,680 --> 00:04:57,759
Speaker 1: Yeah, so four and Lamela Ball and Dallas's own pickback

107
00:04:57,759 --> 00:05:00,120
from Cooper Flag Dallas would have to do that. I

108
00:05:00,160 --> 00:05:02,160
think Charlotte would be what was like, what was going

109
00:05:02,199 --> 00:05:04,480
on with the Hornets there? I'm Michael Jordan running them again?

110
00:05:05,439 --> 00:05:11,000
Speaker 2: Right, Well, they get Cooper Flaggy I think they actually Dan,

111
00:05:11,079 --> 00:05:14,720
I think both teams. So here's the problem. Charlotte should

112
00:05:14,720 --> 00:05:20,319
definitely do that, like without hesitation. But well, I'm sure

113
00:05:20,319 --> 00:05:22,360
they'll be pushed back on the without hesitation part. I

114
00:05:22,360 --> 00:05:26,720
think you do that if you're Charlotte, would I think Dallas? Yeah,

115
00:05:26,720 --> 00:05:28,720
that's a you gotta think about it. With Dallas, I'm

116
00:05:28,720 --> 00:05:30,199
not sure. I'd have to think harder about it to

117
00:05:30,240 --> 00:05:32,959
know whether that's like a no brainer. But I man,

118
00:05:33,199 --> 00:05:33,759
because then you.

119
00:05:33,680 --> 00:05:36,360
Speaker 1: Can take Yeah, so their own pick, sorry I meant

120
00:05:36,360 --> 00:05:37,920
to say their own pick back in twenty seven, so

121
00:05:37,959 --> 00:05:40,720
you would have your next two draft picks in addition

122
00:05:40,720 --> 00:05:43,920
to la mellow ball and number four. Semi interesting, right.

123
00:05:44,079 --> 00:05:45,959
The other one, this is I think this came from

124
00:05:45,959 --> 00:05:48,920
one of our colleagues at Bleacher Report, was what if

125
00:05:48,920 --> 00:05:52,639
you traded Cooper Flag for Jason Tatum and then you

126
00:05:52,720 --> 00:05:55,759
go through the entire gat no Kyrie, not Tatum. Then

127
00:05:55,800 --> 00:05:57,800
you have your own pick next year, and then you

128
00:05:57,879 --> 00:06:01,279
run back in twenty twenty seven with another high lottery pick, Tatum,

129
00:06:01,360 --> 00:06:04,319
Kyrie Irving, and Anthony Davis.

130
00:06:05,360 --> 00:06:08,800
Speaker 2: I uh that would that? Would that allow the Mavericks

131
00:06:08,800 --> 00:06:11,000
to capitalize on the very end of their what is

132
00:06:11,040 --> 00:06:13,199
it a three to five year timeline?

133
00:06:13,319 --> 00:06:16,000
Speaker 1: I think Jason Tatum's a little too young for that, right.

134
00:06:16,160 --> 00:06:18,560
I think Kevin Durant is more Nico Hammon.

135
00:06:18,439 --> 00:06:21,199
Speaker 2: Win now they want to win right now? God, this

136
00:06:21,319 --> 00:06:27,800
fuck's so stupid. What if can the Spurs do any

137
00:06:28,000 --> 00:06:32,879
if it were Castle and two and something else? Does

138
00:06:32,959 --> 00:06:36,240
Dallas bite at that? Castle is probably not like I

139
00:06:36,279 --> 00:06:38,040
would high enough level prospect for that.

140
00:06:38,079 --> 00:06:39,959
Speaker 1: I would need like so many more picks as part

141
00:06:40,000 --> 00:06:41,680
of that, and maybe Devin Vessel as well.

142
00:06:42,879 --> 00:06:45,879
Speaker 2: Yeah, so I was going.

143
00:06:45,720 --> 00:06:47,720
Speaker 1: Through the exercise. Yeah, the Charlotte Dee was the only

144
00:06:47,720 --> 00:06:49,800
one I could think, and I actually don't if I'm Charlotte.

145
00:06:50,199 --> 00:06:52,360
That's just I know the MAVs pick is more valuable

146
00:06:52,360 --> 00:06:53,920
to the MAVs than anybody else, So they're in fury,

147
00:06:54,000 --> 00:06:55,759
not going to be bad in twenty twenty seven. You

148
00:06:55,839 --> 00:06:58,839
owned the pick, but I don't know. Number three, number

149
00:06:58,879 --> 00:07:01,040
four and LaMelo. For me, it seems like a lot.

150
00:07:01,040 --> 00:07:02,680
But that was the only interesting one I could come

151
00:07:02,720 --> 00:07:04,800
up with. I think this lets us get into so

152
00:07:04,839 --> 00:07:06,920
we could talk about Okay, now we're they actually gonna

153
00:07:06,959 --> 00:07:11,240
do this offseason. They're Vitals, so they are around one

154
00:07:11,279 --> 00:07:14,560
point one million dollars into the second Apron after winning

155
00:07:14,560 --> 00:07:16,959
their draft lottery. So that's the part of this is that, Yeah,

156
00:07:17,000 --> 00:07:19,399
you're happy you have Cooper Flag, You've now gotten more

157
00:07:19,399 --> 00:07:22,959
inflexible because the cop hold goes up. This does assume

158
00:07:23,000 --> 00:07:25,680
that Kyrie and Dwight Powell pick up their player options.

159
00:07:26,160 --> 00:07:28,319
Dwight Powell has the four million dollar player option. I

160
00:07:28,360 --> 00:07:30,720
assume he'll pick it up unless he's gonna opt out

161
00:07:30,720 --> 00:07:32,120
and they're gonna give him a one plus one and

162
00:07:32,160 --> 00:07:35,560
a lower number. The Kyrie stuff is interesting, so I

163
00:07:35,560 --> 00:07:38,240
think we should kind of start there. But as a note,

164
00:07:38,360 --> 00:07:41,639
if Dallas is looking to cut costs, they're eighteen million

165
00:07:41,680 --> 00:07:44,319
dollars plus into the tax overall, So like that would

166
00:07:44,319 --> 00:07:45,920
be if this team doesn't want to pay the tax

167
00:07:45,959 --> 00:07:48,519
because Kyrie's injured and they have Cooper Flag and they

168
00:07:48,519 --> 00:07:51,519
feel like they're not resetting but they need a quasi

169
00:07:51,560 --> 00:07:53,759
gap year, that's the number that you would look at

170
00:07:53,759 --> 00:07:56,720
them trying to shed, which is difficult to do spoiler alert.

171
00:07:56,920 --> 00:08:00,639
But Kyrie, what is the like, what's the move for him?

172
00:08:00,639 --> 00:08:02,600
What's the right move for the MAVs. Does it opt

173
00:08:02,639 --> 00:08:04,839
in and extend, does it opt out sign at a

174
00:08:04,879 --> 00:08:07,240
lower average annual value over a longer time?

175
00:08:07,560 --> 00:08:10,959
Speaker 2: What is it? I think my first thought is he

176
00:08:10,959 --> 00:08:14,120
should just pick up just exercise the player option, which

177
00:08:14,160 --> 00:08:16,879
is like what forty three I can't remember what the

178
00:08:16,959 --> 00:08:17,360
number is.

179
00:08:18,040 --> 00:08:22,439
Speaker 1: His option comes in at forty three point four of

180
00:08:22,480 --> 00:08:23,399
a billion dollars.

181
00:08:23,439 --> 00:08:26,600
Speaker 2: I believe my first thought would be picking up rehab

182
00:08:27,079 --> 00:08:29,839
that everybody seems to like the twenty six free agency

183
00:08:29,920 --> 00:08:33,200
scenario better than this one, and just go back out

184
00:08:33,200 --> 00:08:35,679
there and assume that your earning power is still in

185
00:08:35,720 --> 00:08:38,519
the like thirty five to forty million a year range,

186
00:08:38,559 --> 00:08:41,039
maybe higher depending on how short or long the deal is,

187
00:08:41,320 --> 00:08:44,639
and you just do that. But like, there might be

188
00:08:44,720 --> 00:08:48,000
a lot to be said for him, let alone Dallas

189
00:08:48,559 --> 00:08:51,320
in locking down like as much long term money as

190
00:08:51,360 --> 00:08:53,720
you can right now, even if that's like at a

191
00:08:53,840 --> 00:08:58,360
diminished annual rate, particularly if you're like into the near

192
00:08:58,399 --> 00:09:00,799
and mid term future of this team, as Kyrie like,

193
00:09:00,840 --> 00:09:03,080
I'd like to be here with AD and Flag and

194
00:09:03,120 --> 00:09:05,399
we think I think Flag will be ready to help,

195
00:09:05,480 --> 00:09:11,159
like immediately. I still think I would pick it up

196
00:09:11,200 --> 00:09:14,480
and then hit free agency. I wouldn't be surprised though,

197
00:09:14,480 --> 00:09:17,120
if he's like, if you guys can do three year,

198
00:09:17,200 --> 00:09:21,559
I'll opt out three years and one hundred and forty

199
00:09:22,279 --> 00:09:24,519
something like that. I think there's a lot of sense

200
00:09:24,559 --> 00:09:25,879
in him doing something like that.

201
00:09:26,799 --> 00:09:28,879
Speaker 1: So I wonder if you're the MAVs and I was

202
00:09:28,919 --> 00:09:30,960
wrong about Kyrie Irving's player option by the way, it's

203
00:09:30,960 --> 00:09:33,679
forty three million off forty three point four. I wonder

204
00:09:33,720 --> 00:09:35,200
if you're the MAVs you look at this and say,

205
00:09:35,840 --> 00:09:38,399
Kyrie's not going to play it at least January. Cooper

206
00:09:38,399 --> 00:09:40,480
Flag is a rookie. We think he's ready to help

207
00:09:40,559 --> 00:09:42,240
right away, but he's also a rookie, so you kind

208
00:09:42,240 --> 00:09:43,919
of want to give him time and space to see

209
00:09:44,120 --> 00:09:46,080
what he is and what he can do. If you

210
00:09:46,200 --> 00:09:50,600
consider next year a semi gap year, would it be

211
00:09:50,919 --> 00:09:53,039
worth it for the match to say opt in, we

212
00:09:53,120 --> 00:09:56,360
will give you this number now, like at forty three,

213
00:09:56,879 --> 00:09:59,519
and then would you sign a three year ninety million

214
00:09:59,519 --> 00:10:03,519
dollars engine So it's sort of ninety plus the forty

215
00:10:03,519 --> 00:10:05,200
three that ends up being for four years and one

216
00:10:05,240 --> 00:10:06,960
hundred and thirty four million, which is kind of close

217
00:10:07,000 --> 00:10:09,279
to the number that you threw out or you were

218
00:10:09,279 --> 00:10:11,240
saying three years, is it three years and one hundred

219
00:10:11,240 --> 00:10:13,360
million after that? So that what you've done then is

220
00:10:13,440 --> 00:10:18,960
lowered his average annual value at a time when you should,

221
00:10:18,960 --> 00:10:21,440
in theory be more aggressive, because one, you kind of

222
00:10:21,480 --> 00:10:23,600
have to be better since you're picking twenty twenty seven

223
00:10:23,679 --> 00:10:27,399
goes to Charlotte. But also just I'm just very it's

224
00:10:27,440 --> 00:10:29,919
not just the Kyrie Irving injuries that Okay, Cooper Flag

225
00:10:30,000 --> 00:10:33,200
is now the central part of your team, and what

226
00:10:33,279 --> 00:10:35,240
is he supposed to look like or do in year one?

227
00:10:35,279 --> 00:10:37,080
I know Anthony Davis is there, I know the supporting

228
00:10:37,120 --> 00:10:39,639
cast is fairly deep, but I wonder if they end

229
00:10:39,720 --> 00:10:43,159
up viewing this as sort of a miniature gap season

230
00:10:43,200 --> 00:10:46,720
to explore the Cooper Flag space and then that would

231
00:10:46,720 --> 00:10:49,639
be the impetus for But we'll extend Kyrie or we'll

232
00:10:49,679 --> 00:10:51,799
keep his number high in year one of this current

233
00:10:51,840 --> 00:10:54,559
deal so that it starts to lower as there will

234
00:10:54,600 --> 00:10:57,639
be under more pressure and better position to add talent.

235
00:10:58,039 --> 00:11:01,080
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean the way that Dallas has behaved, I

236
00:11:01,159 --> 00:11:04,399
don't they don't feel like a gap year team.

237
00:11:04,399 --> 00:11:06,279
Speaker 1: To me and the games is just how does Antony

238
00:11:06,320 --> 00:11:08,159
Davis feel about a gap year when he's not injured?

239
00:11:08,320 --> 00:11:08,679
At least?

240
00:11:08,759 --> 00:11:12,679
Speaker 2: You right, and like we I I doesn't it feel

241
00:11:12,720 --> 00:11:17,159
like do you think it's more likely that as okay

242
00:11:17,159 --> 00:11:19,440
gap year? On one hand, other hand, is you go

243
00:11:19,559 --> 00:11:22,600
swing a deal for Drew Holliday or some other player

244
00:11:22,720 --> 00:11:26,200
of that ILK giving up definitely a center since you've

245
00:11:26,200 --> 00:11:29,480
got plenty of front court options now and PJ. Washing

246
00:11:29,519 --> 00:11:32,399
we've talked about you, You've mentioned Gafford and Washington. Is

247
00:11:32,440 --> 00:11:35,399
the core of a Drew Holiday trade like doesn't? Do

248
00:11:35,480 --> 00:11:37,960
you think that scenario is more likely where you're adding

249
00:11:38,039 --> 00:11:42,840
like a third veteran, like high end player. Well, your

250
00:11:42,919 --> 00:11:45,000
miles may vary on the current version of Holiday, but

251
00:11:45,039 --> 00:11:48,360
someone like that to go with Ad to be ready

252
00:11:48,679 --> 00:11:51,200
in a over you know, next next year, for Kyrie

253
00:11:51,279 --> 00:11:53,080
to be back and then flags a year better and

254
00:11:53,120 --> 00:11:55,799
that's your that's your like core four and you maybe

255
00:11:55,799 --> 00:11:57,639
get a year or two out of that before age

256
00:11:57,879 --> 00:11:59,879
starts to get the the older guys.

257
00:12:00,720 --> 00:12:03,279
Speaker 1: I do think that would be more I'm not saying obviously,

258
00:12:03,279 --> 00:12:05,039
we're not saying that specific deal, but if you're asking

259
00:12:05,039 --> 00:12:07,159
me whether the MAVs would go through a gap year

260
00:12:07,320 --> 00:12:10,799
versus are they gonna consolidate and try and land somebody,

261
00:12:11,159 --> 00:12:13,679
I think the latter is more likely, And I think

262
00:12:13,679 --> 00:12:17,039
that kind of touches upon their biggest need, which is

263
00:12:17,960 --> 00:12:20,759
it's another ball handler, because they don't I mean, would

264
00:12:20,879 --> 00:12:23,320
you could say Cooper Flag could be one, Like, you

265
00:12:23,399 --> 00:12:27,000
need another primary ball handler, and preferably it's a player

266
00:12:27,000 --> 00:12:29,519
who can also play with Kyrie because he will come back.

267
00:12:29,519 --> 00:12:31,600
And I know Kyrie could play off anybody, but you

268
00:12:31,639 --> 00:12:34,200
want someone who will be strong. I know Luca wasn't

269
00:12:34,240 --> 00:12:37,240
strong defensively, but if they're not gonna have great size,

270
00:12:37,279 --> 00:12:39,919
it'll be like this six foot eight inch point guard.

271
00:12:40,279 --> 00:12:42,039
You want them to be someone like Jew Holliday who

272
00:12:42,080 --> 00:12:43,600
is fine playing off the ball and can be a

273
00:12:43,639 --> 00:12:47,840
defensive monster still. And that's like, you know, getting away

274
00:12:47,879 --> 00:12:49,559
from I know they've been a team that a lot

275
00:12:49,559 --> 00:12:51,200
of people said, like Derek White would make so much

276
00:12:51,240 --> 00:12:53,200
sense for them, and I don't disagree. I just don't

277
00:12:53,200 --> 00:12:55,919
know if they have the asset firepower to go in

278
00:12:55,960 --> 00:12:58,039
there and do it. Because they could trade up to

279
00:12:58,519 --> 00:13:00,799
three first round picks this year. One of those is

280
00:13:00,799 --> 00:13:04,120
Cooper Flag, so the Lakers twenty twenty nine and then

281
00:13:04,159 --> 00:13:06,879
Dallas's own twenty thirty one or twenty thirty two. I

282
00:13:06,919 --> 00:13:09,799
don't think that's enough, Like the bones of that as

283
00:13:09,840 --> 00:13:13,000
a deal, I think you're setting your sites lower than

284
00:13:13,039 --> 00:13:15,200
Derek White, right, Like, I don't know that does that

285
00:13:15,240 --> 00:13:17,600
get you Derek White. I mean, if it's PJ. Washington,

286
00:13:18,240 --> 00:13:20,120
like you're you would have to get into third team

287
00:13:20,159 --> 00:13:22,200
because I'm besueing Boston wants to cut off money there.

288
00:13:22,200 --> 00:13:24,519
But if it's PJ. Washington and two first for Derek White,

289
00:13:24,519 --> 00:13:26,080
and I don't think that's getting it done.

290
00:13:26,480 --> 00:13:29,639
Speaker 2: No, I think you're probably right about that. I think

291
00:13:29,679 --> 00:13:32,399
that gets the holiday would just be easier to get

292
00:13:32,919 --> 00:13:35,200
I don't think you're getting White with that package unless

293
00:13:35,360 --> 00:13:37,919
and the Maps can't do this. You could send back

294
00:13:38,320 --> 00:13:42,120
like somehow way less money and it's like waveable or

295
00:13:42,120 --> 00:13:44,879
expires or whatever, and that's a huge value to the

296
00:13:44,879 --> 00:13:47,039
Celtics who are going to try to get cheaper. But

297
00:13:47,159 --> 00:13:50,080
failing that, I just think there will be way better

298
00:13:50,120 --> 00:13:52,399
offers for Derek White than what Dallas can put on

299
00:13:52,440 --> 00:13:54,480
the table. I think I.

300
00:13:54,440 --> 00:13:57,360
Speaker 1: Would agree, maybe not even way because those picks are

301
00:13:57,399 --> 00:13:59,279
pretty far out, but I would agree with you that

302
00:13:59,320 --> 00:14:01,559
I think there would be better offers. I don't know

303
00:14:01,639 --> 00:14:04,559
that there's like a lot of other names that would

304
00:14:04,639 --> 00:14:06,639
bring to mind here, and like, yeah, you could bring

305
00:14:06,679 --> 00:14:08,879
Spencer Dinwidie back, or if you wanted to look at oh,

306
00:14:08,919 --> 00:14:12,039
could they sign a Malcolm Brogden as a stop gap,

307
00:14:12,039 --> 00:14:16,080
but also maybe someone who could play alongside Kyrie when

308
00:14:16,080 --> 00:14:18,320
he's back. But like, I don't like when you start

309
00:14:18,320 --> 00:14:20,120
to go through the list of available trade targets, and

310
00:14:20,159 --> 00:14:22,639
certainly when looking at the free agents, it's all right, like, ok,

311
00:14:22,720 --> 00:14:24,919
Dennis Shrewder, like maybe that would work for a little bit,

312
00:14:26,039 --> 00:14:28,120
but like there's no one that like sort of pops

313
00:14:28,120 --> 00:14:29,519
to me, is, oh, that would make sense for them

314
00:14:29,559 --> 00:14:31,799
to see if they could. Because look, the other part

315
00:14:31,799 --> 00:14:34,080
of the Cooper Flag thing is you already mentioned that

316
00:14:34,120 --> 00:14:35,879
Daniel Gaffer going to the final year of his deal,

317
00:14:35,919 --> 00:14:38,960
he's extension eligible, but he's also expendable because you're Derek

318
00:14:39,039 --> 00:14:43,440
Lively and Anthony Davis with Cooper flaggets, does that PJ.

319
00:14:43,639 --> 00:14:46,080
Washington in August, I think you could sign an extension

320
00:14:46,080 --> 00:14:48,480
for four years eighty nine point two million dollars. If

321
00:14:48,519 --> 00:14:50,639
you're Dallas, do you offer that or are you trying

322
00:14:50,639 --> 00:14:52,679
to use his expiring money in a trade because it's oh,

323
00:14:52,720 --> 00:14:55,440
between him and Anthony Davis and we have Nagee Marshall too,

324
00:14:55,519 --> 00:14:58,240
is he somewhat expendable and maybe someone who has a

325
00:14:58,240 --> 00:15:01,159
little bit of standalone valu value so that we could

326
00:15:01,159 --> 00:15:02,799
move him as part of a trade. You know, you

327
00:15:02,840 --> 00:15:04,840
threw out Drew Holliday. I just I'm trying to figure

328
00:15:04,840 --> 00:15:06,519
out like another name that would just sort of make

329
00:15:06,600 --> 00:15:08,639
sense here where it's okay, this really fits what they

330
00:15:08,679 --> 00:15:10,799
need now, but then it's also will continue to fit

331
00:15:11,320 --> 00:15:13,320
like the roster once Kyrie Irving is back.

332
00:15:13,639 --> 00:15:16,120
Speaker 2: I think like just keeping Washington at that rate kind

333
00:15:16,120 --> 00:15:18,240
of makes more makes more sense, right, because you do

334
00:15:18,360 --> 00:15:21,120
need a guy like that to to sort of like

335
00:15:21,200 --> 00:15:24,639
fit in between what you've got up front with Davis

336
00:15:24,840 --> 00:15:27,600
and Flag and well, I don't know. Yeah, that that

337
00:15:27,679 --> 00:15:29,919
raises the question of like, well, what position is Davis

338
00:15:29,919 --> 00:15:32,919
gonna play and Flag? Because then if like with PJ,

339
00:15:33,080 --> 00:15:35,919
Washington has to be your three or you're like a

340
00:15:36,000 --> 00:15:39,279
two kind of like a giant two in your best line.

341
00:15:39,080 --> 00:15:40,279
Speaker 1: Boys line up with people?

342
00:15:40,360 --> 00:15:43,320
Speaker 2: Yeah, in that point guard, I mean, I don't know.

343
00:15:43,360 --> 00:15:45,200
I kind of as I talk it out, I don't

344
00:15:45,240 --> 00:15:47,039
hate the I think Washington can guard a lot of

345
00:15:47,039 --> 00:15:52,000
two is probably, but like that that's just a weird configuration.

346
00:15:52,440 --> 00:15:55,200
Where are we on? This is a more global question,

347
00:15:55,919 --> 00:15:58,960
someone like we'll just use Washington? Is he he's more

348
00:15:59,039 --> 00:16:01,320
valuable if you do sign him to that extension as

349
00:16:01,360 --> 00:16:03,840
opposed to trying to trade him as expiring salary unless

350
00:16:03,840 --> 00:16:06,279
you find just unless it's a team that just desperately

351
00:16:06,320 --> 00:16:09,080
needs salary relief, right, Like, it still is the case

352
00:16:09,080 --> 00:16:11,360
that adding years and dollars to somebody makes them a

353
00:16:11,360 --> 00:16:15,919
better trade candidate unless you go overboard, right I think, especially.

354
00:16:15,679 --> 00:16:18,320
Speaker 1: Because at four years and ninety, what is the average

355
00:16:18,360 --> 00:16:21,039
annual value of twenty two point five that's a yeah,

356
00:16:21,159 --> 00:16:24,200
that's solid number for him. That's like what twelve percent

357
00:16:24,240 --> 00:16:26,360
of the salary cap or the moving forward.

358
00:16:26,279 --> 00:16:29,720
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think the expire the expiring salary angle would

359
00:16:29,720 --> 00:16:31,559
have to be like, it's just a way bigger number

360
00:16:31,720 --> 00:16:34,039
than what he's making for them to have the discussion

361
00:16:34,080 --> 00:16:36,000
of is the more valuable expiring and he would have

362
00:16:36,039 --> 00:16:37,759
to be a worse player too, probably.

363
00:16:38,080 --> 00:16:41,720
Speaker 1: Do you do you sign any value to Okay, let's

364
00:16:41,720 --> 00:16:43,679
say they can't get like maybe it's just we'll bring

365
00:16:43,679 --> 00:16:45,679
Spencer Dinwide back and we'll try to fill some of

366
00:16:45,720 --> 00:16:49,039
the ball handling, like just on the fly as you go. Maybe,

367
00:16:49,039 --> 00:16:50,840
like again, Cooper Flagg could do a lot of that,

368
00:16:50,840 --> 00:16:52,000
and that would be a great way to kind of

369
00:16:52,039 --> 00:16:54,600
test the depths of what he's able to do. So

370
00:16:54,679 --> 00:16:56,879
if you can't get someone who you think can run

371
00:16:56,919 --> 00:17:00,960
the show in like for longer stretches of time, does

372
00:17:01,000 --> 00:17:04,440
acquiring more bankable shooting help offset that at all? To

373
00:17:04,480 --> 00:17:07,799
where should they be a Cam Johnson team or should

374
00:17:07,799 --> 00:17:09,759
they be trying to get in on I mean, as

375
00:17:09,799 --> 00:17:11,759
of right now, they don't even have the Miniamalida offer,

376
00:17:11,799 --> 00:17:13,200
but it's like a like should they be getting in

377
00:17:13,279 --> 00:17:15,720
I'm like a Gary Trent junior or Moleague Beasley somehow

378
00:17:15,759 --> 00:17:18,079
we're just trying to like trying to buy low on

379
00:17:18,119 --> 00:17:21,400
a Simoni Fontechio or like going that route, because it's

380
00:17:21,480 --> 00:17:24,079
kind of slim pickens when you're looking at the actual

381
00:17:24,119 --> 00:17:26,599
floor generals, especially if we're narrowing the criteria to say

382
00:17:26,640 --> 00:17:28,920
who can also play next to Kyrie Irving.

383
00:17:28,640 --> 00:17:32,720
Speaker 2: Whicheah comes back, I would just say that I think

384
00:17:32,759 --> 00:17:37,160
because of the positional stuff that's gonna be complicated with,

385
00:17:37,880 --> 00:17:40,160
Like the three, four and five minutes are like pretty

386
00:17:40,200 --> 00:17:43,119
well spoken for. So I do think you need shooting,

387
00:17:43,599 --> 00:17:46,160
and it probably needs to be backcourt shooting, and that

388
00:17:46,200 --> 00:17:48,640
can be a two to three like ideally that can

389
00:17:48,680 --> 00:17:51,319
guard you know, more than one position. But if you're

390
00:17:51,359 --> 00:17:54,680
not gonna be able to get someone that is, you know,

391
00:17:54,720 --> 00:17:57,720
a Kyrie stand in or like a a I don't know.

392
00:17:57,799 --> 00:18:00,359
We given up on Jayden Hardy? Are we done? Are

393
00:18:00,359 --> 00:18:00,680
we done?

394
00:18:00,680 --> 00:18:00,920
Speaker 1: There?

395
00:18:01,160 --> 00:18:02,960
Speaker 2: As a as a possibility, I feel.

396
00:18:02,799 --> 00:18:05,119
Speaker 1: Like they would be more likely to turn to Max Christie.

397
00:18:05,279 --> 00:18:08,319
Speaker 2: For I forgot Max Christie's on this team. I love

398
00:18:08,359 --> 00:18:10,799
Max Christie. Oh this team is how many you throw

399
00:18:10,920 --> 00:18:11,160
him in?

400
00:18:11,279 --> 00:18:13,920
Speaker 1: Yark White? Deal? Maybe Max Christie into first and PG?

401
00:18:14,920 --> 00:18:18,319
Speaker 2: You got my attention, You've definitely got my attention. Is

402
00:18:18,400 --> 00:18:20,559
Dallas gonna win sixty games next year? I forgot about

403
00:18:20,559 --> 00:18:23,359
Max Christie. We need to scrap this whole thing and

404
00:18:23,400 --> 00:18:24,799
start over lead with him?

405
00:18:25,240 --> 00:18:25,880
Speaker 1: Uh?

406
00:18:26,400 --> 00:18:28,559
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's got to be I mean, it's just got

407
00:18:28,599 --> 00:18:31,200
to be a guard. And like I guess, I I

408
00:18:31,240 --> 00:18:35,160
don't think you get away with not adding significant playmaking

409
00:18:35,200 --> 00:18:38,039
though even with Flag maybe being okay at that and

410
00:18:38,079 --> 00:18:40,920
even with Davis, like I guess, you know, the Lakers

411
00:18:40,920 --> 00:18:42,319
tried to use him as more of a hub for

412
00:18:42,359 --> 00:18:45,799
a minute there. I don't think you're gonna survive offensively

413
00:18:45,880 --> 00:18:49,240
without someone you know, making plays and running the offense

414
00:18:49,319 --> 00:18:52,640
and shooting. So yeah, that's got to be the focus.

415
00:18:53,039 --> 00:18:55,640
Speaker 1: Is there something too? And it would require you're gonna

416
00:18:55,680 --> 00:18:58,480
need a third team. Probably well, I mean LA could

417
00:18:58,480 --> 00:19:00,720
take back more money. I just don't know if the deal.

418
00:19:01,119 --> 00:19:06,039
But bog Doug Bogdanovich for Daniel Gafford plus salary. I

419
00:19:06,039 --> 00:19:08,359
guess the challenge is Dallas. So Daniel Gafford's at what

420
00:19:08,519 --> 00:19:12,640
fourteen next year and Bogdanovic, Oh, butomcially at sixteen?

421
00:19:13,119 --> 00:19:14,119
Speaker 2: Oh this is sound?

422
00:19:14,680 --> 00:19:16,440
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, so you just send out you would send

423
00:19:16,440 --> 00:19:18,680
out Daniel Gafford And can you you could go super

424
00:19:18,720 --> 00:19:20,400
small with the salary or is it can you pay

425
00:19:20,920 --> 00:19:23,640
someone or even wo LA consider just taking on the

426
00:19:23,680 --> 00:19:26,599
Dwight Powell four million dollars? So can you compensate Brooklyn

427
00:19:26,640 --> 00:19:28,599
to take on the four million? Or is it do

428
00:19:28,640 --> 00:19:31,759
you trade Omax in that deal? Like do you look

429
00:19:31,799 --> 00:19:34,559
at that? Or would you consider Jaden Hardy and Gafford

430
00:19:34,559 --> 00:19:36,839
for both Don Bogdanovich? Is that something? Is that too

431
00:19:36,920 --> 00:19:38,440
much for the mass? But that might be a sort

432
00:19:38,440 --> 00:19:41,640
of a we're not giving up any picks. Bogdanovich had

433
00:19:41,640 --> 00:19:43,240
a rocky year last year. He was much better when

434
00:19:43,240 --> 00:19:45,519
he went to LA. Was up and down during the playoffs,

435
00:19:45,559 --> 00:19:48,119
but not a primary ball handler. You could certainly put

436
00:19:48,160 --> 00:19:50,759
him on the ball, and he can definitely play off Kyrie,

437
00:19:50,799 --> 00:19:54,200
and I think he's at this point, peak Bogdanovich is

438
00:19:54,200 --> 00:19:56,559
more dynamic than peak Klay Thompson.

439
00:19:56,680 --> 00:19:58,880
Speaker 2: Right, Oh my god, there's yeah, there are a lot

440
00:19:58,880 --> 00:20:02,599
of like U standing furniture that's more dynamic than Klay

441
00:20:02,680 --> 00:20:03,319
Thompson right.

442
00:20:04,440 --> 00:20:06,359
Speaker 1: Spoken like an aggrieved Warriors.

443
00:20:06,960 --> 00:20:08,720
Speaker 2: I'm not agreed it was the right decision to.

444
00:20:08,720 --> 00:20:09,160
Speaker 1: Let him go.

445
00:20:10,119 --> 00:20:14,680
Speaker 2: I think, like, I don't know, it's interesting, Like I

446
00:20:14,759 --> 00:20:17,759
think I think you would do that if you're the MAVs,

447
00:20:17,799 --> 00:20:20,039
even though you could make the case that Gafford is

448
00:20:20,079 --> 00:20:24,000
like just in a vacuum, maybe more valuable than Bogdanovich,

449
00:20:24,119 --> 00:20:28,240
especially pricing in Bogdanovich's inconsistent season and the knees and

450
00:20:28,319 --> 00:20:31,880
all that stuff, But like he immediately becomes the team's

451
00:20:31,920 --> 00:20:34,880
best ball handler, right if he's on the MAVs. Like,

452
00:20:34,920 --> 00:20:38,839
who am I forgetting? So you're just working, You're dealing

453
00:20:38,839 --> 00:20:41,240
from a position of strength, which is your bloated front court,

454
00:20:41,359 --> 00:20:44,160
and addressing a position of weakness, which is a backcourt

455
00:20:44,160 --> 00:20:45,960
that just does not have a lot. So I think

456
00:20:45,960 --> 00:20:48,519
you gotta do that, And honestly, I think the Clippers

457
00:20:48,559 --> 00:20:51,160
might be like yeah, we would love to have like

458
00:20:51,319 --> 00:20:55,319
real size behind zobots uh and that you probably can't

459
00:20:55,319 --> 00:20:58,000
play them together. You definitely, Oh, oh my god, I

460
00:20:58,039 --> 00:21:02,920
hope the big Yeah, now, I think I think that

461
00:21:03,000 --> 00:21:05,039
makes sense. I like that one. But yeah, that's the

462
00:21:05,079 --> 00:21:07,160
caliber of player that you're talking about. Though, if you're

463
00:21:07,200 --> 00:21:09,119
trying to keep the deal small and pick free, is

464
00:21:09,200 --> 00:21:13,160
like you gamble on Bogdanovic being healthy and like starting

465
00:21:13,359 --> 00:21:15,039
maybe like yess, that's a lot.

466
00:21:15,440 --> 00:21:17,240
Speaker 1: That's a lot. Another one I was thinking of a

467
00:21:17,279 --> 00:21:20,960
work and tractually obligated to send this player to every team? Hm,

468
00:21:21,079 --> 00:21:25,160
would you do? Gafford Christie and I don't like, I

469
00:21:25,200 --> 00:21:29,440
guess you would need the Lakers pick for Kobe White

470
00:21:29,440 --> 00:21:32,359
and Lonzo Ball. You can send White palette of Chicago.

471
00:21:32,119 --> 00:21:35,759
Speaker 2: Too, I think so. But then you've got the same

472
00:21:35,759 --> 00:21:39,039
issue Chicago does, where it's like you can't extend White

473
00:21:39,119 --> 00:21:41,480
off that number and you're going to face on restricted

474
00:21:41,519 --> 00:21:43,279
free agencies and then and then.

475
00:21:43,240 --> 00:21:45,440
Speaker 3: Iri is just that's that's real.

476
00:21:46,160 --> 00:21:50,240
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's the they have the defense of, Like Kayla

477
00:21:50,319 --> 00:21:53,519
Martin still on this team, Naji Marshall, If you're keeping PJ. Washington,

478
00:21:53,559 --> 00:21:57,240
Anthony Davis, Derek Lively Cooper Flag. You have the defensive

479
00:21:57,240 --> 00:21:58,559
infrastructure to make that work.

480
00:21:58,960 --> 00:22:01,119
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think you could. Your point of attack will

481
00:22:01,160 --> 00:22:05,559
suck probably, but yeah, you've got enough behind it that

482
00:22:05,759 --> 00:22:08,440
you could you could make it work. Yeah. We were like,

483
00:22:08,720 --> 00:22:11,359
that's the first NAUSEI Marshall mentioned too, I keep forgetting

484
00:22:11,400 --> 00:22:13,559
all these guys that Dallas has that like, I actually

485
00:22:13,640 --> 00:22:14,519
really like they.

486
00:22:14,480 --> 00:22:16,519
Speaker 1: Have a lot of good players. They do, they just

487
00:22:17,920 --> 00:22:19,640
well because then you're still left at gaffer. I was like,

488
00:22:19,680 --> 00:22:21,440
would you be any better off? Like if you could

489
00:22:21,480 --> 00:22:24,519
get Kobe White while giving up Klay Thompson and you're

490
00:22:24,559 --> 00:22:26,480
just attaching picks, like that would be the way because

491
00:22:26,480 --> 00:22:29,200
then all of a sudden, it's, oh, we're keeping Max Christie,

492
00:22:29,240 --> 00:22:31,759
so we have that point of attack option. Might be

493
00:22:31,799 --> 00:22:34,440
something for them because it just feels Kyrie has to

494
00:22:34,440 --> 00:22:36,200
get paid, Kobe White has to get paid, and there

495
00:22:36,279 --> 00:22:39,359
is redundancy there even if they could play together. But

496
00:22:39,440 --> 00:22:42,039
also it's is an offense. Shouldn't that be where you're

497
00:22:42,039 --> 00:22:44,279
tripling down anyway? With the Cooper Flyer is not going

498
00:22:44,359 --> 00:22:46,400
to be expensive for a while. Derek Wively stills two

499
00:22:46,480 --> 00:22:48,839
years left on his rookie scale, so maybe you do

500
00:22:48,960 --> 00:22:51,720
do that, Like is there Klay Thompson like using that

501
00:22:51,759 --> 00:22:53,640
money as the anchor, and then what picks and what

502
00:22:53,720 --> 00:22:55,839
other stuff might need to be included to make it work.

503
00:22:56,160 --> 00:22:57,880
Speaker 2: And then I like that a lot better too if

504
00:22:57,920 --> 00:22:59,839
you could get Kyrie back on like a one plus

505
00:22:59,839 --> 00:23:02,960
one or something, so you're not like, well for the

506
00:23:03,000 --> 00:23:06,119
next because assuming you bring White back after you've traded

507
00:23:06,119 --> 00:23:08,759
for him, which were like two hypothetical steps down the road, now,

508
00:23:09,240 --> 00:23:12,720
like you're not locked into White and Kyrie as like

509
00:23:12,759 --> 00:23:15,640
this is the backcourt for three or four years. It's

510
00:23:15,720 --> 00:23:20,480
just it's kind of like Kyrie's there, maybe he's I mean, realistically,

511
00:23:20,480 --> 00:23:22,160
he will not be what he was coming off in

512
00:23:22,240 --> 00:23:25,160
ACL at this age, Like you go another guaranteed year

513
00:23:25,160 --> 00:23:27,400
with him and then you're back to the player option.

514
00:23:27,599 --> 00:23:30,599
Maybe maybe not. I think all of that makes more

515
00:23:30,599 --> 00:23:34,240
sense if you're not fully in on Kyrie, you know,

516
00:23:34,359 --> 00:23:36,200
for the next four years or whatever.

517
00:23:37,200 --> 00:23:38,839
Speaker 1: One thing that could be interesting, and I think it

518
00:23:38,839 --> 00:23:42,000
would require the Pistons making another move or deciding that hey,

519
00:23:42,000 --> 00:23:44,160
they're not their guy. If you are looking for a

520
00:23:44,200 --> 00:23:46,680
stop gap, like this could be a semi interesting Jade

521
00:23:46,680 --> 00:23:49,319
and Ivy team Like this sort of a second draft guy.

522
00:23:49,799 --> 00:23:51,720
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean I like Jade and Ivy in that

523
00:23:51,759 --> 00:23:54,839
capacity on a lot of teams. I think it would

524
00:23:54,880 --> 00:23:58,359
really stress test a lot of the stuff. We're not

525
00:23:58,480 --> 00:24:01,759
sure Ivy's good. You know, if you put him in

526
00:24:01,759 --> 00:24:04,319
that in like a real like on the ball a

527
00:24:04,400 --> 00:24:07,960
lot roll withah with me, Yeah, I mean.

528
00:24:07,839 --> 00:24:11,200
Speaker 3: That would be that would be tough. But yeah, you

529
00:24:11,319 --> 00:24:11,680
he might.

530
00:24:11,720 --> 00:24:15,720
Speaker 2: He's someone that the again, the highs and the flashes

531
00:24:15,799 --> 00:24:17,839
and stuff are like, yeah, it might be worth worth

532
00:24:17,839 --> 00:24:18,759
a flyer for sure.

533
00:24:19,319 --> 00:24:21,759
Speaker 1: The I think this person that it's another Celtic. We're

534
00:24:21,799 --> 00:24:25,079
gonna trade all the Celtics. I think this contract is

535
00:24:25,079 --> 00:24:28,680
too valuable to Boston given where they're headed. But Peyton

536
00:24:28,720 --> 00:24:32,079
Pritchard here would make a ton of sense, especially in

537
00:24:32,119 --> 00:24:33,960
the interim with that, and that's someone who could also

538
00:24:34,000 --> 00:24:35,519
defend as well.

539
00:24:36,000 --> 00:24:38,799
Speaker 2: Yeah, and I I don't mind him next to Kyrie

540
00:24:39,200 --> 00:24:42,039
for that reason. Yeah, that's interesting. That gets you. I

541
00:24:42,079 --> 00:24:45,640
mean that like super charges, you're you're shooting right, because

542
00:24:45,720 --> 00:24:47,920
like he's he's one of the guys that's pulling up

543
00:24:47,960 --> 00:24:50,720
from super deep creating a bunch of space. That that's

544
00:24:50,759 --> 00:24:53,640
a fun one if you're if you're Boston, though, like

545
00:24:54,519 --> 00:24:57,359
Pritchard Pritchard. I feel like, is this is someone you

546
00:24:57,400 --> 00:25:00,599
include in with another of your higher salar guys to

547
00:25:00,680 --> 00:25:03,200
really bring something back. But I don't know, maybe not.

548
00:25:03,279 --> 00:25:04,559
Maybe they'll just take maybe.

549
00:25:04,359 --> 00:25:08,039
Speaker 1: Drew Holliday, Peyton Pritchard, construction that's involved a little bit here,

550
00:25:08,200 --> 00:25:11,160
Gafford and Washington, and then I don't know what the

551
00:25:11,200 --> 00:25:13,200
other money is, Like you're giving up Christy. Can you

552
00:25:13,200 --> 00:25:15,720
get Kayleb Martin to Brooklyn instead? That would be Then

553
00:25:15,720 --> 00:25:18,079
all of a sudden, it's Drew Holiday, Kyrie Irving and

554
00:25:18,440 --> 00:25:20,960
Peyton Bridge, a lot of former Celtics in all former

555
00:25:21,000 --> 00:25:22,200
Celtics in Metrio at that.

556
00:25:22,319 --> 00:25:24,880
Speaker 2: Not the worst approach considering how good Boston's been for

557
00:25:24,920 --> 00:25:27,039
like ten years, right, take all those guys.

558
00:25:27,079 --> 00:25:28,839
Speaker 1: I think of all the names that I've thrown out there,

559
00:25:28,880 --> 00:25:30,759
and we do this all off the cuff. I've decided

560
00:25:30,759 --> 00:25:32,240
this year not to come in with targets like we

561
00:25:32,279 --> 00:25:34,079
prep with the cap situations. We know all that, But

562
00:25:34,079 --> 00:25:35,200
I was like, let me just come in and throw

563
00:25:35,240 --> 00:25:37,759
some names. I think Peyton Pritchard is my favorite one.

564
00:25:37,799 --> 00:25:40,240
I just don't know what you give up to get him.

565
00:25:40,240 --> 00:25:42,559
If you're taking back Drew Holiday maybe that's considered part

566
00:25:42,599 --> 00:25:45,200
of the compensation, but yeah, you definitely need to rope

567
00:25:45,240 --> 00:25:48,480
in other teams. And you're talking about taking back forty

568
00:25:48,519 --> 00:25:53,240
million dollars, So that's like like Clay and PJ doesn't

569
00:25:53,240 --> 00:25:54,000
even get you there.

570
00:25:54,119 --> 00:25:56,079
Speaker 2: If you're gonna have to have Gafford too, I mean

571
00:25:56,400 --> 00:25:58,880
you could. So if you end up, if you're Dallas

572
00:25:58,960 --> 00:26:02,920
and you've ended up with Pritchard and Holiday, you have

573
00:26:03,039 --> 00:26:07,039
Irving recovering, you still have Christie in in this hypothetical,

574
00:26:07,079 --> 00:26:13,799
and probably Marshall you're probably out, Washington, Thompson, Gafford, you

575
00:26:13,920 --> 00:26:16,599
still have Lively flag age. This team is good.

576
00:26:18,000 --> 00:26:19,079
Speaker 1: Yeah, if they get.

577
00:26:19,079 --> 00:26:21,359
Speaker 2: If they get pritchered in a Holiday, which is like

578
00:26:21,519 --> 00:26:23,640
I don't know, there's a two percent chance that happens,

579
00:26:23,720 --> 00:26:26,440
just because we're spitballing, Like I think they would win

580
00:26:26,480 --> 00:26:28,240
a lot of games like this. They have a lot

581
00:26:28,559 --> 00:26:33,200
I don't know what, just as you can't trade Luca

582
00:26:33,400 --> 00:26:37,160
and then potentially win like like fifty plus sixty games.

583
00:26:37,640 --> 00:26:41,960
That seems unreasonable. But Dallas has I think the takeaway

584
00:26:41,960 --> 00:26:45,359
here is Dallas has a lot of movable like salary

585
00:26:45,880 --> 00:26:48,759
that gives it quite a bit more flexibility than maybe

586
00:26:48,759 --> 00:26:52,079
we than I thought like at first, Blush.

587
00:26:51,880 --> 00:26:53,519
Speaker 1: I would agree with you. And I have two final

588
00:26:53,599 --> 00:26:57,559
quick questions, the Kevin Durant stuff, if you can do

589
00:26:57,599 --> 00:26:59,799
without getting Cooper Flag and so now you're step laddering

590
00:26:59,839 --> 00:27:03,039
your way with what four contracts? And then are the

591
00:27:03,039 --> 00:27:05,920
Suns taking like just the Lakers pick or maybe just

592
00:27:06,039 --> 00:27:08,599
your distant pick if you're Dallas or you considering that

593
00:27:08,720 --> 00:27:10,599
if you can, if you can say hey, we're gonna

594
00:27:10,599 --> 00:27:13,480
sit here and end up with Derek Lively, Anthony Davis,

595
00:27:13,519 --> 00:27:15,880
Cooper Flag, Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving at some point,

596
00:27:15,960 --> 00:27:19,079
maybe not until February, or is that you you know,

597
00:27:19,200 --> 00:27:21,599
you say it's gutting too much of their depth, but

598
00:27:22,079 --> 00:27:24,400
look at all the like name, all the support Clay

599
00:27:24,799 --> 00:27:28,519
Naji Marshall, PJ. Washington, Daniel Gafford, Kayla Martin, Max Christi.

600
00:27:29,000 --> 00:27:30,960
They go six deep of just like, oh, those guys

601
00:27:31,000 --> 00:27:33,720
would be in a playoff rotation, right Yeah? No, I.

602
00:27:35,359 --> 00:27:37,400
Speaker 2: I don't know. I don't know why I feel differently

603
00:27:37,440 --> 00:27:41,200
about Pritchard and Holiday, like liking that versus not liking Duran.

604
00:27:42,400 --> 00:27:44,759
Speaker 1: I prefer that route just because it's more bodies.

605
00:27:45,279 --> 00:27:47,680
Speaker 2: It's more bodies, and it's the positions that you actually need,

606
00:27:47,720 --> 00:27:50,119
Whereas if you're gonna add another guy who can really

607
00:27:50,119 --> 00:27:52,119
only play the four or the five, at this point,

608
00:27:52,119 --> 00:27:54,400
it's like, well, at some point you're just not You

609
00:27:54,480 --> 00:27:56,400
just can't play all your best players, and that's like

610
00:27:56,480 --> 00:28:02,599
a diminishing return situation. I I don't think I want

611
00:28:02,599 --> 00:28:05,640
to be in the Durant business. If I'm Dallas, I don't.

612
00:28:05,519 --> 00:28:10,119
Speaker 1: Know it's three mega salaries unless kyriees are gonna drop

613
00:28:10,160 --> 00:28:13,519
precipitously after next year, or maybe Kevin Durant his next contract.

614
00:28:13,519 --> 00:28:15,359
Maybe that's lower than we expect. I agree with you.

615
00:28:15,480 --> 00:28:18,039
So my final question is they have a lot of options,

616
00:28:18,119 --> 00:28:20,559
but we're kind of unsure of their direction. How much

617
00:28:20,559 --> 00:28:22,519
of a priority do you think they won't be a

618
00:28:22,559 --> 00:28:24,839
second Apron team? They're getting out of that, But how

619
00:28:24,920 --> 00:28:26,480
much of a priority do you think it'll be to

620
00:28:26,519 --> 00:28:29,880
continue to trim just like your tax bill in general.

621
00:28:30,079 --> 00:28:31,200
So as the numbers that I threw out there is

622
00:28:31,240 --> 00:28:33,960
they're eighteen million dollars above the tax I think I'd

623
00:28:33,960 --> 00:28:38,599
be moderately surprised, but not even close to shocked if

624
00:28:38,599 --> 00:28:41,000
it was they tried to do something that just saved them.

625
00:28:41,319 --> 00:28:44,079
Can you send Gafford? He makes more than the mid level,

626
00:28:44,400 --> 00:28:46,240
so that gets a little tricky. But can you just

627
00:28:46,240 --> 00:28:49,240
send Gafford somewhere for minimum money back and then maybe

628
00:28:49,279 --> 00:28:53,079
lop off another middle rung salary and duct attacks that way?

629
00:28:53,640 --> 00:28:55,720
Is it? Do you reevaluate at the trade deadline where

630
00:28:55,759 --> 00:28:57,319
that would be harder to do, but you have until

631
00:28:57,319 --> 00:28:58,599
the end of the year to duck the tax. I

632
00:28:58,680 --> 00:29:01,920
just think this team is deep and it can be good.

633
00:29:02,039 --> 00:29:04,039
But unless they're gonna make like kind of an all

634
00:29:04,079 --> 00:29:06,480
in trade, which neither of us would indoors. Yeah, I

635
00:29:06,519 --> 00:29:08,519
don't like, they're not a team you want to be

636
00:29:08,799 --> 00:29:10,160
into the tax for right.

637
00:29:10,519 --> 00:29:14,200
Speaker 2: I don't think so. And my first thought was gonna be, well,

638
00:29:14,559 --> 00:29:16,519
maybe you just wait till the deadline, like we talk

639
00:29:16,559 --> 00:29:18,839
about all this stuff like it has to happen before

640
00:29:19,079 --> 00:29:22,640
the season opener or whatever. But like if the if

641
00:29:22,680 --> 00:29:24,960
the goal is so, I would say, if they're gonna

642
00:29:25,000 --> 00:29:27,240
do that, if they're gonna say like, let's just get

643
00:29:27,359 --> 00:29:29,599
let's let's take the repeater stuff out of the equation,

644
00:29:29,720 --> 00:29:32,519
let's get under the tax, you you gotta do that now,

645
00:29:32,599 --> 00:29:35,960
because you can't assume Brooklyn's gonna have you know, tens

646
00:29:35,960 --> 00:29:38,400
of millions of dollars of space to facilitate a dump

647
00:29:38,480 --> 00:29:42,599
like that in February. So I think we'll understand their

648
00:29:42,799 --> 00:29:46,920
feelings on the tax soon, because you can't wait and

649
00:29:47,279 --> 00:29:49,359
expect to really do that as effectively get out of

650
00:29:49,359 --> 00:29:53,599
the tax. I mean, how concerned should they be? I

651
00:29:53,640 --> 00:29:56,880
mean that ties into just a much bigger question of like,

652
00:29:57,000 --> 00:30:00,000
we know what they say their timeline is, but like, realistically,

653
00:30:00,759 --> 00:30:04,720
are you gonna be a really expensive contender with Davis

654
00:30:04,720 --> 00:30:06,960
and a healthy Kyrie and someone else you bring in

655
00:30:07,000 --> 00:30:09,920
over the next half decade or are you eventually going

656
00:30:10,000 --> 00:30:12,000
to realize you need to just reorient this thing around

657
00:30:12,079 --> 00:30:15,279
flag and at which point, like you'll probably be under

658
00:30:15,319 --> 00:30:19,960
the tax anyway, you know. So I think it should matter,

659
00:30:20,039 --> 00:30:22,000
but only if they're going the route of like we're

660
00:30:22,079 --> 00:30:25,039
kind of stripping down and doing a bigger reset with

661
00:30:25,079 --> 00:30:27,839
a Davis trade, for example. But because I don't think

662
00:30:27,839 --> 00:30:29,839
they'll do that. I also don't think they're going to

663
00:30:29,920 --> 00:30:32,480
really go nuts about trimming money just.

664
00:30:32,440 --> 00:30:35,160
Speaker 1: Because anything else on these mavericks are you ready takes

665
00:30:35,160 --> 00:30:35,599
out of here?

666
00:30:35,880 --> 00:30:38,039
Speaker 2: Just that they're way better than we thought they were

667
00:30:38,279 --> 00:30:39,720
since having talked a lot of town.

668
00:30:39,920 --> 00:30:40,400
Speaker 3: They're bad.

669
00:30:40,440 --> 00:30:44,720
Speaker 1: They're just in such a weird spot. It's it's the

670
00:30:44,759 --> 00:30:47,720
word is. It's weird. It's awkward. And I do think

671
00:30:48,319 --> 00:30:51,240
it's fair to say their front office does not deserve

672
00:30:51,279 --> 00:30:52,079
the benefit of doubt.

673
00:30:52,680 --> 00:30:55,240
Speaker 2: No, I don't. I think it's gonna be time before the.

674
00:30:56,160 --> 00:30:59,400
Speaker 1: Front office in Executive of the year until like leading

675
00:31:00,079 --> 00:31:00,680
could trade too.

676
00:31:00,599 --> 00:31:06,240
Speaker 2: So yeah, right up until something happened. So yeah, yeah,

677
00:31:06,359 --> 00:31:08,759
So that was that was an interesting one. Thanks everybody

678
00:31:08,759 --> 00:31:11,079
for listening, for watching. As Dan mentioned at the top, uh,

679
00:31:11,200 --> 00:31:13,160
make sure you're subscribed wherever you're listening to this, make

680
00:31:13,200 --> 00:31:15,200
sure you're giving us a positive give us a five

681
00:31:15,279 --> 00:31:19,039
star review. Uh, leave comments on the on our YouTube videos.

682
00:31:19,319 --> 00:31:21,920
Help the algorithm love us back. As we once often said,

683
00:31:23,000 --> 00:31:24,759
let's see join our discord links with that on YouTube

684
00:31:24,759 --> 00:31:27,200
and podcast description. Tell your friends, tell your enemies about this,

685
00:31:27,240 --> 00:31:30,039
help us grow the podcast. We love doing it, and

686
00:31:30,200 --> 00:31:33,319
the bigger the audience, the better. Thanks everybody shouts Frank

687
00:31:33,319 --> 00:31:34,680
Milo Keem apologies, Jared Allen

