WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.399 --> 00:00:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bedtime Astronomy. Explore the wonders of the cosmos

2
00:00:07.759 --> 00:00:12.279
<v Speaker 1>with our soothing Bedtime Astronomie podcast. Each episode offers a

3
00:00:12.359 --> 00:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>gentle journey through the stars, planets, and beyond, perfect for

4
00:00:16.399 --> 00:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>unwinding after a long day. Let's travel through the mysteries

5
00:00:20.239 --> 00:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of the universe as you drift off into a peaceful

6
00:00:22.480 --> 00:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>slumber under the night sky.

7
00:00:26.960 --> 00:00:29.559
<v Speaker 2>Imagine you walk into a preschool, right, and you see

8
00:00:29.559 --> 00:00:32.679
<v Speaker 2>a group of toddlers, and these toddlers are just, you know,

9
00:00:33.000 --> 00:00:37.799
<v Speaker 2>casually assembling a perfectly functional, high performance Formula one engine.

10
00:00:37.960 --> 00:00:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh wow, Yeah, that would be well terrifying, honestly, right.

11
00:00:42.000 --> 00:00:44.399
<v Speaker 2>You wouldn't just be surprised. You would immediately assume that,

12
00:00:44.479 --> 00:00:47.840
<v Speaker 2>like everything you knew about human development, cognitive milestones, and

13
00:00:47.840 --> 00:00:50.560
<v Speaker 2>basic physics was just completely wrong.

14
00:00:50.719 --> 00:00:54.079
<v Speaker 3>You'd be looking at this highly complex finished product in

15
00:00:54.119 --> 00:00:59.399
<v Speaker 3>an environment where honestly, only raw, uncoordinated materials should even exist.

16
00:00:59.560 --> 00:01:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, and today we are looking at the cosmic equivalent

17
00:01:03.359 --> 00:01:04.840
<v Speaker 2>of that Formula one engine.

18
00:01:04.879 --> 00:01:06.760
<v Speaker 3>It's a massive paradigm shift.

19
00:01:06.519 --> 00:01:08.519
<v Speaker 2>It really is. I mean, we are taking you, the listener,

20
00:01:08.599 --> 00:01:11.359
<v Speaker 2>eleven point five billion years into the past. We're looking

21
00:01:11.400 --> 00:01:13.400
<v Speaker 2>at the universe when it was just a mere toddler

22
00:01:13.760 --> 00:01:15.719
<v Speaker 2>only about two billion years.

23
00:01:15.599 --> 00:01:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Old, which in cosmic terms is practically infancy, right, And.

24
00:01:20.200 --> 00:01:23.519
<v Speaker 2>The object we are examining today is designated EIGHTYF twenty

25
00:01:23.519 --> 00:01:26.359
<v Speaker 2>two point a one or sometimes just eighty F twenty

26
00:01:26.400 --> 00:01:27.040
<v Speaker 2>two point one.

27
00:01:27.200 --> 00:01:28.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, both get used in the literature.

28
00:01:29.200 --> 00:01:33.599
<v Speaker 2>And the sheer existence of this galaxy, with its majestic,

29
00:01:33.920 --> 00:01:38.359
<v Speaker 2>highly ordered spiral structure and spinning of these staggering speeds,

30
00:01:38.719 --> 00:01:42.480
<v Speaker 2>it just completely breaks the established timeline of cosmic evolution.

31
00:01:42.319 --> 00:01:44.920
<v Speaker 3>It really does. I mean, the timeline of galaxy formation

32
00:01:45.000 --> 00:01:47.959
<v Speaker 3>has been anchored for decades by this idea called the

33
00:01:48.040 --> 00:01:50.239
<v Speaker 3>hierarchical merging paradigm.

34
00:01:49.799 --> 00:01:52.120
<v Speaker 2>And that's basically the idea that the early universe was

35
00:01:52.200 --> 00:01:54.120
<v Speaker 2>just a chaotic, violent place.

36
00:01:53.959 --> 00:01:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Right right exactly. Early galaxies were expected to be well, irregular,

37
00:01:58.400 --> 00:02:02.799
<v Speaker 3>just clumpy, messy block of gas and young stars smashing together.

38
00:02:02.640 --> 00:02:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Like a cosmic demolition derby.

39
00:02:04.439 --> 00:02:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a good way to put it. Building a stable, massive,

40
00:02:07.760 --> 00:02:11.360
<v Speaker 3>rotationally supported disc something like our modern Mochy way that

41
00:02:11.439 --> 00:02:13.240
<v Speaker 3>was supposed to take billions of years.

42
00:02:13.039 --> 00:02:16.319
<v Speaker 2>Because it requires slow accretion, violent collisions, and then this

43
00:02:16.800 --> 00:02:18.960
<v Speaker 2>gradual settling of angular momentum.

44
00:02:19.080 --> 00:02:21.960
<v Speaker 3>Right, So we definitely did not expect to find a massive,

45
00:02:22.360 --> 00:02:26.240
<v Speaker 3>beautifully structured pinwheel galaxy sitting right there in the immediate

46
00:02:26.280 --> 00:02:28.520
<v Speaker 3>aftermath of the universe's formative epic.

47
00:02:28.719 --> 00:02:31.360
<v Speaker 2>It's wild eighty F twenty two point a one forces

48
00:02:31.400 --> 00:02:34.039
<v Speaker 2>a total re evaluation of how quickly the universe can

49
00:02:34.120 --> 00:02:35.280
<v Speaker 2>organize mass and energy.

50
00:02:35.560 --> 00:02:39.719
<v Speaker 3>It really shows us that highly sophisticated structures can form

51
00:02:40.120 --> 00:02:41.319
<v Speaker 3>incredibly early on.

52
00:02:41.520 --> 00:02:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's unpack this because going from the expectation of

53
00:02:45.039 --> 00:02:49.319
<v Speaker 2>chaotic blobs to discovering a highly ordered, barred spiral in

54
00:02:49.360 --> 00:02:53.039
<v Speaker 2>the Toddler universe, that's a massive shift in our understanding

55
00:02:53.039 --> 00:02:53.479
<v Speaker 2>of physics.

56
00:02:53.560 --> 00:02:54.159
<v Speaker 3>You had shift.

57
00:02:54.280 --> 00:02:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, But before we get into the structural mechanics of

58
00:02:57.319 --> 00:03:00.800
<v Speaker 2>how ADF twenty two top a one built itself without

59
00:03:00.800 --> 00:03:03.960
<v Speaker 2>being destroyed by collisions, we really need to address why

60
00:03:04.000 --> 00:03:05.439
<v Speaker 2>it took us so long to find it.

61
00:03:05.680 --> 00:03:08.199
<v Speaker 3>That's a great question because it is massive.

62
00:03:08.400 --> 00:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Right.

63
00:03:08.680 --> 00:03:11.000
<v Speaker 2>If this thing is so huge, why didn't we see

64
00:03:11.000 --> 00:03:13.240
<v Speaker 2>it earlier? I mean, we've had the Hubble space telescope

65
00:03:13.280 --> 00:03:15.800
<v Speaker 2>staring to the deep field for decades now.

66
00:03:15.840 --> 00:03:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, the simple answer is that Hubble was fundamentally blinded

67
00:03:18.599 --> 00:03:20.919
<v Speaker 3>by the very nature of these specific early.

68
00:03:20.719 --> 00:03:24.039
<v Speaker 2>Galaxies, blinded how like by the distance no by dust.

69
00:03:24.280 --> 00:03:26.960
<v Speaker 3>ADF twenty two dot a one falls into a category

70
00:03:27.000 --> 00:03:30.240
<v Speaker 3>we call dusty star forming galaxies or dsfgs.

71
00:03:30.360 --> 00:03:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Ah. Okay, the dust is the key.

72
00:03:32.199 --> 00:03:35.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, these are systems undergoing star formation at rates that

73
00:03:35.400 --> 00:03:39.039
<v Speaker 3>are just almost incomprehensible by our local standards.

74
00:03:39.120 --> 00:03:40.639
<v Speaker 2>What kind of rates are we talking about here?

75
00:03:40.759 --> 00:03:44.599
<v Speaker 3>We're talking about hundreds, sometimes even thousands of solar masses

76
00:03:44.759 --> 00:03:47.120
<v Speaker 3>being converted into stars every single year.

77
00:03:47.319 --> 00:03:50.479
<v Speaker 2>Wow. And just for context, the Milky Way produces what

78
00:03:50.680 --> 00:03:52.560
<v Speaker 2>maybe one to three solar masses a.

79
00:03:52.599 --> 00:03:55.840
<v Speaker 3>Year, exactly just a handful. So ADF twenty two dot

80
00:03:55.879 --> 00:03:59.120
<v Speaker 3>a one is an absolute monster in comparison.

81
00:03:59.240 --> 00:04:02.400
<v Speaker 2>But the byprod of all that rampant star formation is

82
00:04:02.400 --> 00:04:05.000
<v Speaker 2>an immense amount of interstellar dust right right.

83
00:04:05.039 --> 00:04:08.360
<v Speaker 3>The massive short lived O and B type stars in

84
00:04:08.400 --> 00:04:13.319
<v Speaker 3>these early galaxies, they basically explode as supernovae very quickly, and.

85
00:04:13.240 --> 00:04:16.879
<v Speaker 2>Those explosions enriched the interstellar medium with heavier elements.

86
00:04:17.000 --> 00:04:20.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and those elements condense into microscopic dust grains. It

87
00:04:20.199 --> 00:04:22.480
<v Speaker 3>creates this incredibly thick cosmic.

88
00:04:22.079 --> 00:04:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Fog, and dust is incredibly efficient at absorbing short wavelength light.

89
00:04:26.079 --> 00:04:28.560
<v Speaker 2>So all that ultraviolet and optical light pouring out of

90
00:04:28.600 --> 00:04:31.399
<v Speaker 2>those young hot stars just hits the dust and scatters.

91
00:04:31.560 --> 00:04:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Right, Because the wavelength of that light is roughly the

92
00:04:34.600 --> 00:04:37.759
<v Speaker 3>same size as the dust grains themselves, it's essentially blocked.

93
00:04:38.279 --> 00:04:41.000
<v Speaker 2>So when Hubble looked at these early epochs, it couldn't

94
00:04:41.000 --> 00:04:44.839
<v Speaker 2>see the underlying stellar architecture at all. Because Hubble is

95
00:04:44.920 --> 00:04:49.040
<v Speaker 2>primarily an optical and near infrared observatory.

96
00:04:48.759 --> 00:04:51.879
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, it's all only the leakage. Hubble would capture a

97
00:04:51.879 --> 00:04:56.879
<v Speaker 3>few irregular, clumpy patches of rest frame ultraviolet light that

98
00:04:56.959 --> 00:04:58.319
<v Speaker 3>just happened to escape.

99
00:04:58.079 --> 00:05:00.839
<v Speaker 2>Through thinner, less dense regions the dust clouds.

100
00:05:00.959 --> 00:05:04.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and this observational bias actually fed the old paradigm perfectly.

101
00:05:04.959 --> 00:05:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I see. Because astronomers only saw messy, disjointed clumps

102
00:05:09.120 --> 00:05:12.680
<v Speaker 2>of light, they naturally concluded that the galaxies themselves were

103
00:05:12.759 --> 00:05:14.839
<v Speaker 2>messy disjointed clumps.

104
00:05:14.920 --> 00:05:17.439
<v Speaker 3>Right. We were looking at the uneven surface of a

105
00:05:17.480 --> 00:05:20.279
<v Speaker 3>thick fog bank, and just assuming that the terrain underneath

106
00:05:20.360 --> 00:05:21.800
<v Speaker 3>was just as irregular.

107
00:05:21.439 --> 00:05:24.040
<v Speaker 2>That's a brilliant way to picture it. So to pierce

108
00:05:24.079 --> 00:05:26.399
<v Speaker 2>that fog, we needed to move entirely out of the

109
00:05:26.399 --> 00:05:27.439
<v Speaker 2>optical spectrum.

110
00:05:27.480 --> 00:05:31.480
<v Speaker 3>We needed observatories operating at wavelength that simply ignore the dust.

111
00:05:31.480 --> 00:05:34.079
<v Speaker 2>Entirely, which brings us to the pairing of the James

112
00:05:34.079 --> 00:05:39.600
<v Speaker 2>web Space Telescope and ALMA, the Atacoma Large Millimeter submillimeter Array.

113
00:05:39.959 --> 00:05:42.519
<v Speaker 3>This is where the technology finally caught up to the physics.

114
00:05:42.839 --> 00:05:45.079
<v Speaker 3>Let's start with JWST, right.

115
00:05:44.920 --> 00:05:49.519
<v Speaker 2>Because JWST is designed specifically to capture longer wavelength infrared light.

116
00:05:49.879 --> 00:05:53.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and because those infrared waves are physically longer than

117
00:05:53.639 --> 00:05:56.480
<v Speaker 3>the diameter of the cosmic dust grains, the light just

118
00:05:56.519 --> 00:05:57.680
<v Speaker 3>passes right through the fog.

119
00:05:57.839 --> 00:06:01.759
<v Speaker 2>It's like having X ray vision for dust. JWST's near

120
00:06:01.920 --> 00:06:05.040
<v Speaker 2>infrared camera in IRCAM essentially allows us to see the

121
00:06:05.079 --> 00:06:08.639
<v Speaker 2>actual distribution of the older, cooler stars exactly.

122
00:06:08.879 --> 00:06:12.480
<v Speaker 3>It reveals the true structural skeleton of the galaxy. But

123
00:06:12.560 --> 00:06:16.360
<v Speaker 3>while JWST gives us the stellar mass distribution, it doesn't

124
00:06:16.360 --> 00:06:17.480
<v Speaker 3>give us the kinematics.

125
00:06:17.600 --> 00:06:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Right. It shows us where the stars are, but not

126
00:06:19.759 --> 00:06:21.240
<v Speaker 2>how the raw material is moving.

127
00:06:21.480 --> 00:06:24.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that is where ALME comes in. LMA operates

128
00:06:24.399 --> 00:06:26.079
<v Speaker 3>in the submillimeter regime.

129
00:06:25.959 --> 00:06:30.839
<v Speaker 2>Specifically looking at wavelengths around eight hundred and seventy micrometers

130
00:06:30.839 --> 00:06:32.199
<v Speaker 2>for this object right correct.

131
00:06:32.240 --> 00:06:35.720
<v Speaker 3>At those wavelengths, Alia is passive. It's capturing the thermal

132
00:06:35.759 --> 00:06:38.160
<v Speaker 3>emission of the warm dusk greens themselves.

133
00:06:37.720 --> 00:06:40.319
<v Speaker 2>And it also picks up specific emission lines of cold

134
00:06:40.360 --> 00:06:42.519
<v Speaker 2>molecular gas and ionized atoms.

135
00:06:42.600 --> 00:06:45.240
<v Speaker 3>Right for eightf twenty two dot a one. Al MA

136
00:06:45.519 --> 00:06:48.279
<v Speaker 3>was tuned to track a very specific signature, the fine

137
00:06:48.279 --> 00:06:50.680
<v Speaker 3>structure emission line of ionized carbon.

138
00:06:50.439 --> 00:06:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Also known as the CII emission line.

139
00:06:52.560 --> 00:06:56.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, carbon is distributed throughout the interstellar medium of these galaxies.

140
00:06:56.160 --> 00:06:59.279
<v Speaker 2>And when the electrons in these carbon atoms drop from

141
00:06:59.360 --> 00:07:05.160
<v Speaker 2>higher energy state to a lower one, they meet a photon.

142
00:07:04.959 --> 00:07:08.560
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, a photon with a very specific resting wavelength of

143
00:07:08.600 --> 00:07:10.480
<v Speaker 3>about one hundred and fifty eight micrometers.

144
00:07:10.519 --> 00:07:12.879
<v Speaker 2>Wait. I see a major challenge here, though, Okay, what

145
00:07:13.040 --> 00:07:16.439
<v Speaker 2>is it? If JWST is mapping the infrared light from

146
00:07:16.439 --> 00:07:20.839
<v Speaker 2>the stars and ALMA is mapping the submillimeter emission from

147
00:07:20.879 --> 00:07:24.079
<v Speaker 2>the ionized carbon gas, how do we know they are

148
00:07:24.079 --> 00:07:26.360
<v Speaker 2>looking at the exact same physical structure?

149
00:07:26.560 --> 00:07:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Ah, the alignment problem.

150
00:07:28.319 --> 00:07:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Right. In a crowded early universe, a line of sight

151
00:07:31.560 --> 00:07:34.279
<v Speaker 2>could easily pass through a random cloud of gas in

152
00:07:34.319 --> 00:07:36.920
<v Speaker 2>the foreground before hitting a galaxy in the background.

153
00:07:36.959 --> 00:07:38.079
<v Speaker 3>It absolutely could.

154
00:07:38.160 --> 00:07:40.199
<v Speaker 2>So if you just lay the two images on top

155
00:07:40.240 --> 00:07:43.519
<v Speaker 2>of each other, how do you mathematically prove the alignment

156
00:07:43.600 --> 00:07:46.240
<v Speaker 2>is real and not just an optical illusion of the perspective?

157
00:07:46.519 --> 00:07:51.560
<v Speaker 3>That requires really rigorous astrometric calibration. Astronomers don't just blindly

158
00:07:51.600 --> 00:07:52.759
<v Speaker 3>overlay the images.

159
00:07:52.439 --> 00:07:54.199
<v Speaker 2>And hope for the best, okay, So what do they do?

160
00:07:54.319 --> 00:07:56.680
<v Speaker 3>They use a shared reference frame. Typically it's tied to

161
00:07:56.720 --> 00:07:58.839
<v Speaker 3>the International Celestial Reference System.

162
00:07:58.680 --> 00:08:00.839
<v Speaker 2>So they find common points in both images.

163
00:08:01.199 --> 00:08:04.120
<v Speaker 3>Exactly in the fields observed by both telescopes, there are

164
00:08:04.120 --> 00:08:08.639
<v Speaker 3>point sources, usually quasars or well characterized background objects.

165
00:08:08.319 --> 00:08:11.600
<v Speaker 2>And these objects emit strongly in both near infrared and

166
00:08:11.680 --> 00:08:13.040
<v Speaker 2>submillimeter wavelengths.

167
00:08:13.199 --> 00:08:16.600
<v Speaker 3>Right by aligning the absolute coordinates of those known reference

168
00:08:16.639 --> 00:08:20.000
<v Speaker 3>points down to fractions of an arcsecond, you can lock

169
00:08:20.040 --> 00:08:20.959
<v Speaker 3>the two maps together.

170
00:08:21.160 --> 00:08:24.079
<v Speaker 2>The gas from LMA and the stellar light from JWST

171
00:08:24.199 --> 00:08:25.519
<v Speaker 2>are perfectly registered.

172
00:08:25.639 --> 00:08:28.959
<v Speaker 3>Yes, And when that precise astrometric overlay was performed for

173
00:08:29.160 --> 00:08:33.039
<v Speaker 3>eighty F twenty two dot A one, the spatial distribution

174
00:08:33.120 --> 00:08:36.559
<v Speaker 3>of the gas matched the stellar morphology perfectly.

175
00:08:36.399 --> 00:08:39.840
<v Speaker 2>So it definitely wasn't a foreground cloud. The ionized carbon

176
00:08:39.960 --> 00:08:41.759
<v Speaker 2>was dynamically bound to the stellar disc.

177
00:08:42.240 --> 00:08:44.840
<v Speaker 3>It was a single cohesive object, no doubt about it.

178
00:08:44.879 --> 00:08:47.720
<v Speaker 2>And once that alignment is locked, the image that emerges

179
00:08:47.799 --> 00:08:50.399
<v Speaker 2>is just breath taking. We strip away the cosmic fog

180
00:08:50.440 --> 00:08:52.480
<v Speaker 2>and we don't see a blob, no blog at all.

181
00:08:52.559 --> 00:08:57.000
<v Speaker 2>We see a giant, rapidly rotating barred spiral disc. It

182
00:08:57.039 --> 00:09:00.799
<v Speaker 2>has a clear spiral distribution of stars, a central elongated

183
00:09:00.840 --> 00:09:04.320
<v Speaker 2>barlike feature spanning the core, and massive clumpy arms.

184
00:09:04.320 --> 00:09:06.879
<v Speaker 3>That's beautiful. Yeah, but the visual is really only half

185
00:09:06.879 --> 00:09:08.039
<v Speaker 3>the story here, right.

186
00:09:08.120 --> 00:09:11.159
<v Speaker 2>The physical properties are truly defy the models. Let's look

187
00:09:11.159 --> 00:09:14.240
<v Speaker 2>at the numbers. The Snellar disc is roughly twice the

188
00:09:14.279 --> 00:09:17.519
<v Speaker 2>size of typical galaxies from that exact same era right.

189
00:09:17.399 --> 00:09:21.200
<v Speaker 3>At redshift zev round three, and the median stellar mass

190
00:09:21.720 --> 00:09:25.120
<v Speaker 3>sits at a log of m star over msun greater

191
00:09:25.159 --> 00:09:26.039
<v Speaker 3>than ten point eight.

192
00:09:26.399 --> 00:09:29.559
<v Speaker 2>Translating that log rhythmic scale for you listening, we are

193
00:09:29.559 --> 00:09:32.799
<v Speaker 2>looking at a stellar mass well in excess of sixty

194
00:09:33.000 --> 00:09:35.240
<v Speaker 2>billion times the mass of our Sun.

195
00:09:35.440 --> 00:09:37.440
<v Speaker 3>And that is just the mass locked up in the stars.

196
00:09:37.480 --> 00:09:39.879
<v Speaker 3>That's not even accounting for the dark matter halo or

197
00:09:39.919 --> 00:09:41.639
<v Speaker 3>the vast reservoirs of gas.

198
00:09:41.879 --> 00:09:45.399
<v Speaker 2>That's insane for a galaxy to have converted that much

199
00:09:45.480 --> 00:09:49.200
<v Speaker 2>raw material into a stable stellar population just two billion

200
00:09:49.279 --> 00:09:51.720
<v Speaker 2>years after the Big Bang. It places it in a

201
00:09:51.799 --> 00:09:53.600
<v Speaker 2>rare heavyweight class, it really does.

202
00:09:54.039 --> 00:09:57.360
<v Speaker 3>But the mass is just the prerequisite for the real anomaly.

203
00:09:56.960 --> 00:09:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Here, which lies in the kinematics right exactly.

204
00:09:59.399 --> 00:10:02.240
<v Speaker 3>This goes back to Alma and the ionized carbon emission

205
00:10:02.240 --> 00:10:03.519
<v Speaker 3>line we were just talking about.

206
00:10:03.360 --> 00:10:06.879
<v Speaker 2>Because Alima isn't just taking a static picture of the gas,

207
00:10:06.879 --> 00:10:08.919
<v Speaker 2>it's actually measuring the Doppler shift.

208
00:10:09.080 --> 00:10:12.759
<v Speaker 3>Correct, we know the rest wavelength of the CII emission line.

209
00:10:12.840 --> 00:10:15.759
<v Speaker 2>So as Alima observes the disc of EIGHTF twenty two

210
00:10:15.799 --> 00:10:18.679
<v Speaker 2>dot a one, it detects that the wavelength of light

211
00:10:18.759 --> 00:10:21.600
<v Speaker 2>coming from one side of the galaxy is stretched or

212
00:10:21.639 --> 00:10:22.960
<v Speaker 2>red shifted.

213
00:10:22.799 --> 00:10:25.879
<v Speaker 3>Meaning that specific gas is physically moving away from us,

214
00:10:25.919 --> 00:10:26.159
<v Speaker 3>and on.

215
00:10:26.120 --> 00:10:28.799
<v Speaker 2>The opposite side of the disc the wavelength is compressed

216
00:10:29.039 --> 00:10:29.679
<v Speaker 2>or blue.

217
00:10:29.399 --> 00:10:31.759
<v Speaker 3>Shifted, which means the gas is approaching us. Right.

218
00:10:32.159 --> 00:10:34.960
<v Speaker 2>And when you plot these velocities across the spatial plane

219
00:10:34.960 --> 00:10:38.759
<v Speaker 2>of the galaxy, it generates an isovelocity contour.

220
00:10:38.360 --> 00:10:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Map, frequently referred to as a spider diagram. The highly

221
00:10:42.080 --> 00:10:46.720
<v Speaker 3>symmetrical nature of This diagram is the undeniable kinematic signature

222
00:10:46.759 --> 00:10:50.240
<v Speaker 3>of a coherent, cohesive rotating disc.

223
00:10:50.279 --> 00:10:53.480
<v Speaker 2>And the velocity of that rotation is what completely breaks

224
00:10:53.519 --> 00:10:56.879
<v Speaker 2>the models. The Alma data reveals that this massive disc

225
00:10:57.000 --> 00:11:00.120
<v Speaker 2>is spinning at an incredible five hundred and thirty kilometers.

226
00:10:59.679 --> 00:11:01.399
<v Speaker 3>Percon It's moving incredibly fast.

227
00:11:01.480 --> 00:11:05.000
<v Speaker 2>At that speed, the centrifugal force is immense. The outer

228
00:11:05.159 --> 00:11:08.000
<v Speaker 2>edges of this galaxy are moving so fast that they should,

229
00:11:08.039 --> 00:11:11.000
<v Speaker 2>by all rights just be flung out into intergalactic space.

230
00:11:11.080 --> 00:11:12.039
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they really should be.

231
00:11:12.240 --> 00:11:15.000
<v Speaker 2>So if the buryonic mass, you know, the sixty billion

232
00:11:15.039 --> 00:11:18.399
<v Speaker 2>solar masses of stars plus the gas, isn't enough to

233
00:11:18.399 --> 00:11:21.840
<v Speaker 2>hold it together against that rotational shear, where is the

234
00:11:21.840 --> 00:11:22.840
<v Speaker 2>gravitational anchor?

235
00:11:23.039 --> 00:11:25.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, you have to assume the dark matter fraction here

236
00:11:25.519 --> 00:11:28.679
<v Speaker 3>is incredibly dense to prevent the galaxy from tearing itself apart.

237
00:11:28.799 --> 00:11:31.559
<v Speaker 2>The dark matter halo is the unseen scaffolding.

238
00:11:31.639 --> 00:11:35.159
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, to maintain stability at a rotational velocity of five

239
00:11:35.240 --> 00:11:38.480
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty kilometers per second eightyf twenty two point a,

240
00:11:38.639 --> 00:11:42.279
<v Speaker 3>one must possess a dynamical mass that far exceeds its

241
00:11:42.320 --> 00:11:43.200
<v Speaker 3>buryonic mass.

242
00:11:43.279 --> 00:11:46.600
<v Speaker 2>It's the dark matter providing the deep gravitational well required

243
00:11:46.600 --> 00:11:49.240
<v Speaker 2>to tether all that high velocity gas and stars.

244
00:11:49.320 --> 00:11:52.399
<v Speaker 3>Right, But what is truly anomalous is the dynamical state

245
00:11:52.480 --> 00:11:55.399
<v Speaker 3>of the baryens themselves. How So we quantify it by

246
00:11:55.399 --> 00:11:58.840
<v Speaker 3>something called the V over signa ratio. That's the rotational

247
00:11:58.879 --> 00:12:02.799
<v Speaker 3>velocity V divided by the velocity dispersion sigma.

248
00:12:02.360 --> 00:12:06.399
<v Speaker 2>And velocity dispersion measures the chaotic, random, thermal like motions

249
00:12:06.399 --> 00:12:08.080
<v Speaker 2>of the stars and gas within the system.

250
00:12:08.159 --> 00:12:11.039
<v Speaker 3>Right. Yes, so high velocity dispersion means the orbits of

251
00:12:11.080 --> 00:12:13.559
<v Speaker 3>the stars are highly elliptical, plunging in and out of

252
00:12:13.559 --> 00:12:16.080
<v Speaker 3>the galactic center in totally random orientations.

253
00:12:16.320 --> 00:12:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So for decades, numerical simulations suggested that massive galaxies

254
00:12:21.000 --> 00:12:23.320
<v Speaker 2>in the early universe would be dispersion.

255
00:12:22.840 --> 00:12:25.799
<v Speaker 3>Supported, exactly because they were supposed to form through those

256
00:12:25.879 --> 00:12:27.200
<v Speaker 3>violent mergers we talked.

257
00:12:27.039 --> 00:12:28.919
<v Speaker 2>About the demolition Derby, Right.

258
00:12:29.120 --> 00:12:31.840
<v Speaker 3>The kinetic energy of those collisions would be pumped into

259
00:12:31.879 --> 00:12:32.960
<v Speaker 3>the random motions of.

260
00:12:32.919 --> 00:12:35.799
<v Speaker 2>The stars, which results in a high sigma and a

261
00:12:35.840 --> 00:12:39.200
<v Speaker 2>low V. They would be puffy, chaotic ellipticals.

262
00:12:39.320 --> 00:12:42.480
<v Speaker 3>But eighty f twenty two dot a one has a

263
00:12:42.639 --> 00:12:45.759
<v Speaker 3>very high V over sigma ratio. It is a rotationally

264
00:12:45.759 --> 00:12:46.559
<v Speaker 3>supported disk.

265
00:12:46.840 --> 00:12:51.000
<v Speaker 2>The ordered coherent spinning far out weighs the chaotic buzzing.

266
00:12:51.279 --> 00:12:53.519
<v Speaker 2>The kinetic energy is highly organized.

267
00:12:53.600 --> 00:12:55.919
<v Speaker 3>It is which forces a massive logical paradox.

268
00:12:55.960 --> 00:12:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Honestly, I was just thinking that if this galaxy has

269
00:12:58.519 --> 00:13:01.639
<v Speaker 2>tens of billions of solar mass of stars, the traditional

270
00:13:01.720 --> 00:13:03.879
<v Speaker 2>rule book says it must have achieved that mass by

271
00:13:03.960 --> 00:13:05.320
<v Speaker 2>consuming other galaxies.

272
00:13:05.399 --> 00:13:08.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, hierarchical merging. Small halos of dark matter and gas

273
00:13:08.799 --> 00:13:10.559
<v Speaker 3>crash together to make larger halos.

274
00:13:10.639 --> 00:13:13.919
<v Speaker 2>But major mergers are incredibly violent. If a galaxy half

275
00:13:14.000 --> 00:13:16.480
<v Speaker 2>the size of EIGHTF twenty two but a one slammed

276
00:13:16.519 --> 00:13:20.159
<v Speaker 2>into it, the gravitational tidal forces would completely scramble the

277
00:13:20.240 --> 00:13:21.120
<v Speaker 2>orbits of the stars.

278
00:13:21.440 --> 00:13:25.600
<v Speaker 3>It would completely destroy that delicate, high velocity rotationally supported

279
00:13:25.639 --> 00:13:26.360
<v Speaker 3>spiral disc.

280
00:13:26.559 --> 00:13:30.200
<v Speaker 2>It would just leave behind a dispersion supported scrap peep. So,

281
00:13:30.240 --> 00:13:33.399
<v Speaker 2>how does an object get this massive without getting messy?

282
00:13:33.480 --> 00:13:36.440
<v Speaker 3>We can actually quantify the absence of that messiness using

283
00:13:36.440 --> 00:13:37.759
<v Speaker 3>morphological mathematics.

284
00:13:37.840 --> 00:13:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so astronomers don't just rely on visual classification.

285
00:13:41.039 --> 00:13:45.279
<v Speaker 3>No, they analyze the light distribution using non parametric metrics,

286
00:13:45.720 --> 00:13:49.000
<v Speaker 3>primarily the cirsic index and the GENM twenty coefficients.

287
00:13:49.080 --> 00:13:52.039
<v Speaker 2>Let's break those down. What is the cirsic profile.

288
00:13:52.200 --> 00:13:54.960
<v Speaker 3>It basically measures how the intensity of a galaxy's light

289
00:13:55.159 --> 00:13:57.440
<v Speaker 3>varies with distance from its center.

290
00:13:57.279 --> 00:13:58.759
<v Speaker 2>So how the brightness fades out.

291
00:13:59.000 --> 00:14:02.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, a c index of n equals one describes an

292
00:14:02.480 --> 00:14:05.840
<v Speaker 3>exponential profile, and that is the mathematical signature of a

293
00:14:05.840 --> 00:14:07.080
<v Speaker 3>flat extended disc.

294
00:14:07.240 --> 00:14:09.039
<v Speaker 2>Okay, what about a higher number.

295
00:14:08.799 --> 00:14:12.879
<v Speaker 3>An index of n equals four, known as the devocolur profile,

296
00:14:13.240 --> 00:14:16.600
<v Speaker 3>describes a highly concentrated, steep light distribution.

297
00:14:16.320 --> 00:14:19.879
<v Speaker 2>Which is typical of a massive dispersion supported elliptical galaxy

298
00:14:20.559 --> 00:14:23.200
<v Speaker 2>or a dense central bulge built by mergers.

299
00:14:23.600 --> 00:14:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Right, and when you map the infrared light from JWST

300
00:14:27.639 --> 00:14:30.799
<v Speaker 3>for ADFU two dot a one, it fits the n

301
00:14:30.840 --> 00:14:32.679
<v Speaker 3>equals one exponential profile.

302
00:14:32.960 --> 00:14:36.519
<v Speaker 2>It firmly aligns with a disk profile. It's mathematical proof

303
00:14:36.600 --> 00:14:38.080
<v Speaker 2>of its shape exactly.

304
00:14:38.480 --> 00:14:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Furthermore, you have the gene coefficient.

305
00:14:40.279 --> 00:14:42.519
<v Speaker 2>Wait, isn't that an economics term, like it used to

306
00:14:42.600 --> 00:14:44.120
<v Speaker 2>track wealth inequality?

307
00:14:44.240 --> 00:14:46.840
<v Speaker 3>It is, but in astrophysics it's used to measure the

308
00:14:46.879 --> 00:14:50.200
<v Speaker 3>inequality of pixel slux values in a galaxy image.

309
00:14:50.320 --> 00:14:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's clever. So a high gene coefficient means the

310
00:14:53.200 --> 00:14:56.320
<v Speaker 2>light is highly concentrated in a few bright pixels.

311
00:14:55.960 --> 00:14:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, which often indicates a dense core or violent localized

312
00:15:00.200 --> 00:15:01.960
<v Speaker 3>starbursts from a recent merger.

313
00:15:02.080 --> 00:15:04.639
<v Speaker 2>Okay, and what is the M twenty part of GENM twenty?

314
00:15:04.840 --> 00:15:07.399
<v Speaker 3>M twenty measures the second order moment of the brightest

315
00:15:07.440 --> 00:15:10.039
<v Speaker 3>twenty percent of the galaxy's pixels. It acts as an

316
00:15:10.039 --> 00:15:11.360
<v Speaker 3>indicator of spatial structure.

317
00:15:11.480 --> 00:15:14.159
<v Speaker 2>So mergers typically produce high Genie and high M twenty

318
00:15:14.240 --> 00:15:17.679
<v Speaker 2>values because the light is unevenly distributed into multiple clumps

319
00:15:17.759 --> 00:15:18.480
<v Speaker 2>or tidle tales.

320
00:15:18.559 --> 00:15:20.799
<v Speaker 3>Right, So by running the pixels through these formulas you

321
00:15:20.879 --> 00:15:22.320
<v Speaker 3>remove human bias entirely.

322
00:15:22.639 --> 00:15:24.639
<v Speaker 2>You aren't just looking at an image and saying, well,

323
00:15:24.679 --> 00:15:27.759
<v Speaker 2>it looks like a disc. You are mathematically proving that

324
00:15:27.799 --> 00:15:32.039
<v Speaker 2>the distribution of mass lacks the localized spikes and tidal

325
00:15:32.120 --> 00:15:35.320
<v Speaker 2>distortions that a major merger would inevitably leave behind.

326
00:15:35.480 --> 00:15:39.159
<v Speaker 3>It classifies cleanly as a late type disc. But as

327
00:15:39.200 --> 00:15:41.519
<v Speaker 3>you said, if it didn't smash its way to sixty

328
00:15:41.559 --> 00:15:44.840
<v Speaker 3>billion solar masses, how did it get so heavy?

329
00:15:45.000 --> 00:15:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Right? Where does the mass come from? If not from collisions?

330
00:15:48.120 --> 00:15:48.879
<v Speaker 3>Smooth accretion?

331
00:15:49.039 --> 00:15:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Smooth accretion? Okay, explain how.

332
00:15:51.000 --> 00:15:55.600
<v Speaker 3>We see that the data from jwst in Lama reveals

333
00:15:55.600 --> 00:15:59.600
<v Speaker 3>a distinct wavelength dependent size trend, and this provides the

334
00:15:59.600 --> 00:16:01.279
<v Speaker 3>finger of its growth mechanism.

335
00:16:01.440 --> 00:16:04.279
<v Speaker 2>Okay, what does a wavelength dependent sized trend actually mean

336
00:16:04.360 --> 00:16:05.080
<v Speaker 2>for the galaxy?

337
00:16:05.240 --> 00:16:08.519
<v Speaker 3>Well, when observed its shorter rest frame wavelengths, which trace

338
00:16:08.720 --> 00:16:12.720
<v Speaker 3>the hot, highly energetic young blue stars, the physical extent

339
00:16:12.759 --> 00:16:14.320
<v Speaker 3>of the galaxy appears much larger.

340
00:16:14.360 --> 00:16:15.919
<v Speaker 2>The effective radius is extended.

341
00:16:16.039 --> 00:16:20.919
<v Speaker 3>Yes. However, when observed at longer wavelengths, which trace the older, cooler,

342
00:16:21.039 --> 00:16:24.879
<v Speaker 3>lower mass stars, the galaxy is significantly more compact, with.

343
00:16:24.799 --> 00:16:27.639
<v Speaker 2>The light concentrated heavily in the central regions, so that

344
00:16:27.679 --> 00:16:30.440
<v Speaker 2>wavelength gradient maps directly to an age gradient.

345
00:16:30.639 --> 00:16:32.399
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, it is inside outgrowth.

346
00:16:32.480 --> 00:16:35.159
<v Speaker 2>The core of the galaxy is the oldest region. It

347
00:16:35.279 --> 00:16:38.399
<v Speaker 2>formed first, and over the past billion years or so,

348
00:16:38.799 --> 00:16:42.000
<v Speaker 2>generations of stars have lived and died there, choking the

349
00:16:42.039 --> 00:16:43.000
<v Speaker 2>center with dust.

350
00:16:43.519 --> 00:16:46.840
<v Speaker 3>But the galaxy isn't just sitting there. It is continuously

351
00:16:46.840 --> 00:16:48.559
<v Speaker 3>adding mass to its outer edges.

352
00:16:48.720 --> 00:16:52.759
<v Speaker 2>The younger bluer light is extended because pristine raw material

353
00:16:52.840 --> 00:16:55.320
<v Speaker 2>is continuously arriving at the periphery of the disc.

354
00:16:55.440 --> 00:16:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Right it rives, cools, condenses, and ignites into fresh rings.

355
00:16:59.480 --> 00:16:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Of new star.

356
00:17:00.440 --> 00:17:04.559
<v Speaker 2>It's expanding its borders outwards smoothly without disrupting the ancient

357
00:17:04.720 --> 00:17:05.599
<v Speaker 2>established core.

358
00:17:05.799 --> 00:17:09.680
<v Speaker 3>This continuous, smooth delivery of gas is basically the only

359
00:17:09.759 --> 00:17:13.680
<v Speaker 3>way to build a massive, rotationally supported disc this early

360
00:17:13.680 --> 00:17:14.400
<v Speaker 3>in the universe.

361
00:17:14.440 --> 00:17:16.960
<v Speaker 2>But a galaxy cannot accrete tens of billions of solar

362
00:17:17.000 --> 00:17:20.039
<v Speaker 2>masses of gas smoothly unless it resides in an environment

363
00:17:20.160 --> 00:17:22.119
<v Speaker 2>capable of providing that supply chain.

364
00:17:22.519 --> 00:17:25.039
<v Speaker 3>That's the key. We have to look beyond the galaxy

365
00:17:25.039 --> 00:17:28.160
<v Speaker 3>itself and examine the broader cosmological scaffolding.

366
00:17:28.400 --> 00:17:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Because EIGHTYF twenty two but A one does not exist

367
00:17:31.559 --> 00:17:34.119
<v Speaker 2>in an isolated void. It is located at the center

368
00:17:34.160 --> 00:17:37.240
<v Speaker 2>of the SSA twenty two protocluster at redshift Z equals

369
00:17:37.240 --> 00:17:38.920
<v Speaker 2>three point zero nine, and.

370
00:17:38.960 --> 00:17:42.319
<v Speaker 3>A protocluster is essentially a massive over density of dark

371
00:17:42.359 --> 00:17:45.880
<v Speaker 3>matter that is in the process of gravitationally collapsing to

372
00:17:45.960 --> 00:17:47.200
<v Speaker 3>form a galaxy.

373
00:17:46.799 --> 00:17:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Cluster, which are the largest bound structures in the universe.

374
00:17:50.160 --> 00:17:52.359
<v Speaker 2>And this SSA twenty two region is.

375
00:17:52.400 --> 00:17:57.160
<v Speaker 3>Extreme, very extreme. The number density of galaxies in this

376
00:17:57.200 --> 00:18:01.839
<v Speaker 3>specific volume of space is over ten times the cosmic average, so.

377
00:18:01.799 --> 00:18:05.240
<v Speaker 2>It's an incredibly crowded neighborhood, but way a crowded neighborhood

378
00:18:05.319 --> 00:18:10.000
<v Speaker 2>usually means more collisions, more hierarchical merging, you'd think so, yes,

379
00:18:10.079 --> 00:18:12.920
<v Speaker 2>So if it's surrounded by other galaxies, how is EIGHTF

380
00:18:13.000 --> 00:18:16.519
<v Speaker 2>twenty two dot a one avoiding the demolition derby and

381
00:18:16.559 --> 00:18:18.400
<v Speaker 2>pulling in pristine gas.

382
00:18:18.240 --> 00:18:20.400
<v Speaker 3>By tapping directly into the cosmic web.

383
00:18:20.480 --> 00:18:23.880
<v Speaker 2>The cosmic web, I love that term, It's very descriptive.

384
00:18:24.039 --> 00:18:28.279
<v Speaker 3>Cosmological simulations demonstrate that dark matter forms a vast three

385
00:18:28.319 --> 00:18:30.119
<v Speaker 3>dimensional filamentary network.

386
00:18:29.839 --> 00:18:32.519
<v Speaker 2>And galaxies and clusters form at the nodes where these

387
00:18:32.519 --> 00:18:34.119
<v Speaker 2>filaments intersect exactly.

388
00:18:34.160 --> 00:18:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Now. For a long time, the dominant theory was that

389
00:18:36.319 --> 00:18:39.400
<v Speaker 3>gas falling into a massive dark matter halo would undergo

390
00:18:39.519 --> 00:18:40.440
<v Speaker 3>shock heating.

391
00:18:40.400 --> 00:18:43.319
<v Speaker 2>Creating a spherical halo of hot gas that would slowly

392
00:18:43.359 --> 00:18:45.279
<v Speaker 2>cool and rain down onto the galaxy.

393
00:18:45.599 --> 00:18:49.079
<v Speaker 3>Right, But in the highly dense environments of protoclusters in

394
00:18:49.119 --> 00:18:52.799
<v Speaker 3>the early universe, we see a totally different fluid dynamic.

395
00:18:53.319 --> 00:18:55.880
<v Speaker 3>We see cold streams cold streams.

396
00:18:55.920 --> 00:18:58.240
<v Speaker 2>So the gas in the filaments is so dense that

397
00:18:58.279 --> 00:19:01.079
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't shock heat when it hits the outer boundary

398
00:19:01.119 --> 00:19:03.000
<v Speaker 2>of the dark matter halo exactly.

399
00:19:03.039 --> 00:19:06.000
<v Speaker 3>It maintains its low temperature and essentially punches right through

400
00:19:06.039 --> 00:19:06.519
<v Speaker 3>the hot.

401
00:19:06.359 --> 00:19:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Halo, delivering a concentrated stream of coal gas directly to

402
00:19:10.240 --> 00:19:11.240
<v Speaker 2>the central galaxy.

403
00:19:11.400 --> 00:19:15.079
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and the team that map this, led by Hideki Umihata,

404
00:19:15.519 --> 00:19:20.160
<v Speaker 3>specifically found these massive inflows of coal gas traveling along

405
00:19:20.200 --> 00:19:23.920
<v Speaker 3>the intergalactic filaments directly into the core of the SSA

406
00:19:24.000 --> 00:19:25.119
<v Speaker 3>twenty two protocluster.

407
00:19:25.279 --> 00:19:28.440
<v Speaker 2>These cold streams are the crucial mechanism for understanding ADF

408
00:19:28.720 --> 00:19:31.160
<v Speaker 2>two dot A one's extreme rotation, aren't.

409
00:19:30.920 --> 00:19:33.440
<v Speaker 3>They They are The filaments of the cosmic web do

410
00:19:33.519 --> 00:19:36.720
<v Speaker 3>not just deliver mass, They deliver angular momentum.

411
00:19:36.240 --> 00:19:39.839
<v Speaker 2>Because as the cold gas flows along the vast cosmological filaments,

412
00:19:40.079 --> 00:19:43.319
<v Speaker 2>it carries the inherent rotational energy of the macro structure.

413
00:19:43.480 --> 00:19:46.640
<v Speaker 3>Yes, because the filament's fee into the galaxy from specific

414
00:19:46.720 --> 00:19:50.039
<v Speaker 3>offset angles rather than falling straight toward the center, so.

415
00:19:49.960 --> 00:19:53.559
<v Speaker 2>They exert a torque. It's like perfectly throwing a spiraling

416
00:19:53.599 --> 00:19:57.440
<v Speaker 2>football or wrapping a string around a top and pulling it.

417
00:19:57.519 --> 00:20:00.400
<v Speaker 3>That's a perfect analogy. The cold streams of at the

418
00:20:00.440 --> 00:20:02.799
<v Speaker 3>outskirts of the galaxy, and because they are coming in

419
00:20:02.799 --> 00:20:05.240
<v Speaker 3>at an angle, they wrap around the existing structure.

420
00:20:05.480 --> 00:20:09.079
<v Speaker 2>The gas settles into a stable co rotating orbit at

421
00:20:09.119 --> 00:20:12.319
<v Speaker 2>the periphery of the disk before it even condenses into stars.

422
00:20:12.359 --> 00:20:14.720
<v Speaker 3>And then that explains the five hundred and thirty kilometer

423
00:20:14.759 --> 00:20:15.599
<v Speaker 3>per second rotation.

424
00:20:15.920 --> 00:20:20.119
<v Speaker 2>The galaxy isn't just spinning because of its own localized collapse.

425
00:20:20.440 --> 00:20:22.799
<v Speaker 2>It is being actively spun up by the torque of

426
00:20:22.839 --> 00:20:24.960
<v Speaker 2>the intergalactic filaments feeding it.

427
00:20:24.960 --> 00:20:27.599
<v Speaker 3>It gets its mass and its stability from the exact

428
00:20:27.640 --> 00:20:31.200
<v Speaker 3>same supply line. It is an incredibly efficient transfer of

429
00:20:31.359 --> 00:20:35.319
<v Speaker 3>energy and mass from the macrocosmological scale down to the

430
00:20:35.359 --> 00:20:36.279
<v Speaker 3>galactic scale.

431
00:20:36.319 --> 00:20:39.319
<v Speaker 2>As long as the cold streams remain intact, the galaxy

432
00:20:39.319 --> 00:20:43.079
<v Speaker 2>can undergo sustained rapid star formation in its outer disc

433
00:20:43.440 --> 00:20:46.400
<v Speaker 2>without suffering the structural scrambling of a major merger.

434
00:20:46.599 --> 00:20:49.000
<v Speaker 3>The environment dictates the morphology entirely.

435
00:20:49.119 --> 00:20:52.799
<v Speaker 2>It's brilliant physics. But it also dictates a finite life span,

436
00:20:52.920 --> 00:20:53.359
<v Speaker 2>doesn't it.

437
00:20:53.480 --> 00:20:54.119
<v Speaker 3>Oh, definitely.

438
00:20:54.200 --> 00:20:57.440
<v Speaker 2>If the SSA twenty two protocluster is continuously pulling in

439
00:20:57.519 --> 00:21:00.839
<v Speaker 2>mass and collapsing, the local environment is going to change

440
00:21:00.920 --> 00:21:02.079
<v Speaker 2>dramatically over time.

441
00:21:02.359 --> 00:21:06.119
<v Speaker 3>It will that vast spherical dark matter halo we mentioned

442
00:21:06.160 --> 00:21:09.240
<v Speaker 3>earlier is going to accumulate more and more hot gas.

443
00:21:09.480 --> 00:21:12.839
<v Speaker 2>Eventually the space between the galaxies, and this protocluster isn't

444
00:21:12.880 --> 00:21:14.559
<v Speaker 2>going to be empty, It's going to be filled with

445
00:21:14.559 --> 00:21:19.559
<v Speaker 2>an incredibly dense, superheated plasma called the intracluster medium or ICM.

446
00:21:19.759 --> 00:21:23.759
<v Speaker 3>Right, and as EIGHTF twenty two dot A one continues

447
00:21:23.799 --> 00:21:26.440
<v Speaker 3>to move through the deepening gravitational well of the cluster,

448
00:21:26.880 --> 00:21:29.759
<v Speaker 3>what do you think happens to its delicate cold gas supply?

449
00:21:30.000 --> 00:21:34.160
<v Speaker 2>It faces a severe hydrodynamical stripping process. The physics of

450
00:21:34.279 --> 00:21:35.599
<v Speaker 2>ram pressure exactly.

451
00:21:36.000 --> 00:21:38.799
<v Speaker 3>Ram pressure dictates that as a galaxy moves through the hot,

452
00:21:38.799 --> 00:21:42.319
<v Speaker 3>dense fluid of the intracluster medium, it experiences a huge

453
00:21:42.400 --> 00:21:43.319
<v Speaker 3>drag force.

454
00:21:43.240 --> 00:21:45.359
<v Speaker 2>And the pressure obserted on the cold gas in the

455
00:21:45.359 --> 00:21:48.519
<v Speaker 2>galaxy's disc is proportional to the density of the ICM

456
00:21:48.599 --> 00:21:50.400
<v Speaker 2>and the square of the galaxies velocity.

457
00:21:50.640 --> 00:21:54.000
<v Speaker 3>So, given the massive gravitational acceleration within a forming cluster

458
00:21:54.559 --> 00:21:56.799
<v Speaker 3>adf twenty two to eat a one will eventually reach

459
00:21:56.839 --> 00:21:59.920
<v Speaker 3>a velocity where the RAM pressure exceeds the gravitational re

460
00:22:00.079 --> 00:22:01.920
<v Speaker 3>storing force holding the gas to.

461
00:22:01.880 --> 00:22:06.559
<v Speaker 2>The disc, meaning the hot intergalactic wind literally scours the

462
00:22:06.640 --> 00:22:09.279
<v Speaker 2>cold gas right out of the spiral arms completely.

463
00:22:09.640 --> 00:22:12.279
<v Speaker 3>The gas is stripped away, trailing behind the galaxy in

464
00:22:12.319 --> 00:22:13.480
<v Speaker 3>a massive tail.

465
00:22:13.319 --> 00:22:16.839
<v Speaker 2>Leaving the stellar disc entirely depleted of the raw hydrogen

466
00:22:16.880 --> 00:22:19.480
<v Speaker 2>and molecular gas required to form new stars.

467
00:22:19.799 --> 00:22:23.400
<v Speaker 3>Furthermore, the sheer mass of the growing cluster halo will

468
00:22:23.440 --> 00:22:26.920
<v Speaker 3>eventually shock heat the incoming cold streams from the cosmic web,

469
00:22:27.200 --> 00:22:29.559
<v Speaker 3>cutting off the intercollected supply line entirely.

470
00:22:29.680 --> 00:22:32.559
<v Speaker 2>So it's a combination of starvation from the severed filaments

471
00:22:32.599 --> 00:22:33.960
<v Speaker 2>and ram pressure.

472
00:22:33.559 --> 00:22:37.319
<v Speaker 3>Stripping, yes, and this leads to a rapid permanent cessation

473
00:22:37.400 --> 00:22:40.599
<v Speaker 3>of star formation. We call this quenching, which means.

474
00:22:40.440 --> 00:22:44.119
<v Speaker 2>This magnificent five hundred and thirty kilometer per second spiral

475
00:22:44.480 --> 00:22:46.359
<v Speaker 2>is essentially living on borrowed time.

476
00:22:46.480 --> 00:22:50.559
<v Speaker 3>It is a spectacular but incredibly brief phase of galactic evolution.

477
00:22:50.440 --> 00:22:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Because without new hot blue stars being formed in the

478
00:22:53.440 --> 00:22:56.960
<v Speaker 2>outer disc, the existing massive stars will quickly burn out

479
00:22:56.960 --> 00:22:58.880
<v Speaker 2>and die as supernovae.

480
00:22:58.240 --> 00:23:00.119
<v Speaker 3>And all that will be left are the low mass

481
00:23:00.160 --> 00:23:01.160
<v Speaker 3>cool red stars.

482
00:23:01.480 --> 00:23:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Current evolutionary tracks suggest that by redshift z equals one

483
00:23:05.200 --> 00:23:08.319
<v Speaker 2>to two, which is just a few billion years after

484
00:23:08.359 --> 00:23:11.440
<v Speaker 2>the snapshot we are currently examining EIGHTF twenty two, but

485
00:23:11.559 --> 00:23:14.440
<v Speaker 2>A one will have lost its spiral arms entirely.

486
00:23:14.680 --> 00:23:17.839
<v Speaker 3>The disc will fade, the kinematics will likely be altered

487
00:23:17.880 --> 00:23:20.640
<v Speaker 3>by the increasingly crowded environment, and it will.

488
00:23:20.440 --> 00:23:24.519
<v Speaker 2>Morph into one of the massive, dead red elliptical galaxies

489
00:23:24.559 --> 00:23:28.400
<v Speaker 2>that dominate the cores of modern galaxy clusters like Coma

490
00:23:28.519 --> 00:23:29.160
<v Speaker 2>or Virgo.

491
00:23:29.359 --> 00:23:33.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that evolutionary art requires us to fundamentally broaden

492
00:23:33.200 --> 00:23:36.640
<v Speaker 3>our cosmological context. How so, because EIGHTF twenty two toad

493
00:23:36.680 --> 00:23:39.559
<v Speaker 3>A one is not a singular anomaly, it is an

494
00:23:39.640 --> 00:23:44.160
<v Speaker 3>archetype for a newly recognized pathway of early galaxy formation.

495
00:23:44.559 --> 00:23:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Right Because for a long time, observational astronomy operated on

496
00:23:47.400 --> 00:23:50.720
<v Speaker 2>the assumption that the Hubble sequence the morphological classification of

497
00:23:50.720 --> 00:23:54.400
<v Speaker 2>galaxies into Grand design spirals, ellipticals and irregulars only locked

498
00:23:54.440 --> 00:23:56.880
<v Speaker 2>into place at much lower redshifts.

499
00:23:56.480 --> 00:23:59.640
<v Speaker 3>After billions of years of chaotic assembly. The early universe

500
00:23:59.680 --> 00:24:02.079
<v Speaker 3>was thought to be populated exclusively by those irregulars we

501
00:24:02.160 --> 00:24:02.920
<v Speaker 3>talked about.

502
00:24:02.680 --> 00:24:06.359
<v Speaker 2>But the combination of JWST and LMA has completely dismantled

503
00:24:06.359 --> 00:24:06.960
<v Speaker 2>that assumption.

504
00:24:07.200 --> 00:24:10.440
<v Speaker 3>Once astronomers knew the signature of these cold rotating discs,

505
00:24:10.680 --> 00:24:13.599
<v Speaker 3>they started finding them wherever the environmental conditions were right.

506
00:24:13.759 --> 00:24:16.480
<v Speaker 2>So we are seeing a profound paradigm shift backed by

507
00:24:16.559 --> 00:24:18.160
<v Speaker 2>multiple independent surveys.

508
00:24:18.359 --> 00:24:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, for example, at a red shift of z equals

509
00:24:21.440 --> 00:24:24.799
<v Speaker 3>three point twenty five, roughly contemporaneous with eight f twenty

510
00:24:24.799 --> 00:24:27.960
<v Speaker 3>two dot a one, astronomers discovered an object known as

511
00:24:27.960 --> 00:24:28.680
<v Speaker 3>the Big Wheel.

512
00:24:28.880 --> 00:24:34.079
<v Speaker 2>Another exceptionally massive, kinematically stable rotating discs Yes.

513
00:24:34.119 --> 00:24:37.359
<v Speaker 3>And in the Spiderweb protocluster redshift z equals two point

514
00:24:37.400 --> 00:24:41.359
<v Speaker 3>one six. Extensive surveys have revealed a significant population of

515
00:24:41.480 --> 00:24:45.519
<v Speaker 3>dusty star forming galaxies exhibiting extended stellar.

516
00:24:45.200 --> 00:24:49.519
<v Speaker 2>Discs undergoing rapid, smooth structural growth driven by accretion rather

517
00:24:49.559 --> 00:24:50.200
<v Speaker 2>than mergers.

518
00:24:50.319 --> 00:24:52.599
<v Speaker 3>And we are pushing the timeline back even further.

519
00:24:52.440 --> 00:24:53.839
<v Speaker 2>Than that, right the Rebel Survey.

520
00:24:53.960 --> 00:24:57.200
<v Speaker 3>Yes, The Rebel Survey a massive, amim large program. It's

521
00:24:57.200 --> 00:25:01.680
<v Speaker 3>specifically targeted extremely distant galaxies and found the kinematic signatures

522
00:25:01.720 --> 00:25:04.279
<v Speaker 3>of cold rotating discs as far back as rich of

523
00:25:04.359 --> 00:25:05.200
<v Speaker 3>z round seven.

524
00:25:05.559 --> 00:25:08.599
<v Speaker 2>That is, just seven hundred million years after the Big Bang.

525
00:25:09.359 --> 00:25:11.920
<v Speaker 2>The universe was barely out of the epoch of realization,

526
00:25:12.400 --> 00:25:14.880
<v Speaker 2>and it had already figured out how to balance immense

527
00:25:14.920 --> 00:25:19.319
<v Speaker 2>gravitational collapse with angular momentum to build stable discs.

528
00:25:19.640 --> 00:25:23.240
<v Speaker 3>The underlying physics of fluid dynamics. Dark matter collapse and

529
00:25:23.319 --> 00:25:26.759
<v Speaker 3>angular momentum transfer do not require billions of years to operate.

530
00:25:26.880 --> 00:25:30.359
<v Speaker 2>The universe is incredibly efficient. If a massive dark matter

531
00:25:30.400 --> 00:25:34.079
<v Speaker 2>halo intersects with cold, dense filaments of the cosmic web,

532
00:25:34.559 --> 00:25:37.839
<v Speaker 2>it will rapidly funnel that gas into a central rotating disc.

533
00:25:38.200 --> 00:25:40.680
<v Speaker 3>So the Hubble sequence was established incredibly early in the

534
00:25:40.759 --> 00:25:44.799
<v Speaker 3>universe's history, provided the local supply chain was impact.

535
00:25:44.759 --> 00:25:47.440
<v Speaker 2>And our ability to map this early Hubble sequence is

536
00:25:47.440 --> 00:25:50.359
<v Speaker 2>only going to improve exponentially. We are looking at a

537
00:25:50.400 --> 00:25:52.440
<v Speaker 2>golden age of kinematic astronomy.

538
00:25:52.640 --> 00:25:55.680
<v Speaker 3>Unquestionably, the data we have from ALMA right now tracing

539
00:25:55.680 --> 00:25:59.960
<v Speaker 3>the ionized carbon is revolutionary, but it is just the beginning.

540
00:26:00.000 --> 00:26:03.559
<v Speaker 2>Because LMA is undergoing continuous band upgrades that will vastly

541
00:26:03.559 --> 00:26:05.920
<v Speaker 2>increase its correlator bandwidth insensitivity.

542
00:26:06.279 --> 00:26:10.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes, we will have future observation cycles with JWST providing

543
00:26:10.960 --> 00:26:15.440
<v Speaker 3>even deeper near infrared integration times to trace the lowest

544
00:26:15.480 --> 00:26:18.039
<v Speaker 3>mass stars in the outer extremities of these disks.

545
00:26:18.440 --> 00:26:21.880
<v Speaker 2>But perhaps most exciting are the next generation facilities coming

546
00:26:21.920 --> 00:26:24.799
<v Speaker 2>online in the late twenty twenties and twenty thirties. You're

547
00:26:24.839 --> 00:26:28.440
<v Speaker 2>talking about the thirty meter class observatories like the extremely

548
00:26:28.519 --> 00:26:30.079
<v Speaker 2>large telescope the ELT.

549
00:26:30.440 --> 00:26:34.559
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, the ELT will provide unprecedented spatial resolution from the

550
00:26:34.599 --> 00:26:38.559
<v Speaker 3>ground in the near infrared, utilizing advanced adaptive optics to

551
00:26:38.599 --> 00:26:40.759
<v Speaker 3>correct for atmospheric distortion, so.

552
00:26:40.680 --> 00:26:43.160
<v Speaker 2>We will be able to resolve the individual stellar clumps

553
00:26:43.200 --> 00:26:45.759
<v Speaker 2>and bar structures in these early discs with the clarity

554
00:26:45.799 --> 00:26:48.359
<v Speaker 2>we currently reserve for local galaxies.

555
00:26:47.799 --> 00:26:49.839
<v Speaker 3>And in the radio regime, The square kilometer Array the

556
00:26:49.880 --> 00:26:52.160
<v Speaker 3>SKA will transform our kinematic mapping.

557
00:26:52.000 --> 00:26:55.599
<v Speaker 2>Entirely, because currently tracing ionized carbon is effective, but it

558
00:26:55.680 --> 00:26:58.880
<v Speaker 2>traces gas that is partially affected by the harsh ultraviolet

559
00:26:58.960 --> 00:27:00.599
<v Speaker 2>radiation of young stone.

560
00:27:00.839 --> 00:27:04.000
<v Speaker 3>With the SKA and upgraded ALMA receivers, we will be

561
00:27:04.000 --> 00:27:07.680
<v Speaker 3>able to conduct deep, high resolution mapping of carbon monoxide CO.

562
00:27:08.200 --> 00:27:10.720
<v Speaker 2>And COO is basically the holy grail for tracking the

563
00:27:10.759 --> 00:27:12.359
<v Speaker 2>actual fuel for star formation.

564
00:27:12.880 --> 00:27:16.839
<v Speaker 3>It is because it exists exclusively in the deepest, coldest,

565
00:27:17.039 --> 00:27:20.720
<v Speaker 3>most shielded molecular clouds where stars are actually born.

566
00:27:21.079 --> 00:27:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Right now, CO is incredibly faint and hard to detect

567
00:27:24.039 --> 00:27:28.000
<v Speaker 2>at redshift z equals three, but next generation arrays will

568
00:27:28.039 --> 00:27:31.000
<v Speaker 2>allow us to map the precise velocities of the actual

569
00:27:31.119 --> 00:27:34.160
<v Speaker 2>stellar nurseries. Not just the generalized gas.

570
00:27:34.359 --> 00:27:36.519
<v Speaker 3>We won't just be looking at the macro rotation of

571
00:27:36.559 --> 00:27:40.119
<v Speaker 3>the disc. We will be mapping the localized turbulence and

572
00:27:40.160 --> 00:27:43.200
<v Speaker 3>the exact mechanics of how the gas fragments into stars.

573
00:27:43.359 --> 00:27:48.599
<v Speaker 2>That's amazing. The integration of high resolution cookinematics, JWST, stellar

574
00:27:48.640 --> 00:27:53.000
<v Speaker 2>mass mapping, and advanced hydrodynamical simulations will allow us to

575
00:27:53.240 --> 00:27:56.519
<v Speaker 2>essentially watch the inside out assembly of these massive galaxies

576
00:27:56.519 --> 00:27:57.400
<v Speaker 2>in high definition.

577
00:27:57.519 --> 00:28:00.240
<v Speaker 3>We are transitioning from the era of simply fire ending

578
00:28:00.279 --> 00:28:03.599
<v Speaker 3>these early monsters to the era of precisely reverse engineering

579
00:28:03.680 --> 00:28:04.359
<v Speaker 3>their construction.

580
00:28:04.720 --> 00:28:08.519
<v Speaker 2>The hierarchical merging paradigm remains a critical component of cosmic evolution,

581
00:28:08.720 --> 00:28:11.880
<v Speaker 2>particularly for lower mass galaxies and the late time assembly

582
00:28:11.920 --> 00:28:14.240
<v Speaker 2>of clusters, but we now know it is not the

583
00:28:14.319 --> 00:28:15.119
<v Speaker 2>universal rule.

584
00:28:15.240 --> 00:28:18.279
<v Speaker 3>The early universe was perfectly capable of building highly ordered

585
00:28:18.359 --> 00:28:21.400
<v Speaker 3>massive structures through smooth filamentary accretion.

586
00:28:21.799 --> 00:28:24.160
<v Speaker 2>It is a stunning reversal of how we view the

587
00:28:24.200 --> 00:28:27.240
<v Speaker 2>early cosmos. I mean, we started today looking at a

588
00:28:27.319 --> 00:28:31.480
<v Speaker 2>universe shrouded in a thick, obscuring dust, a place we

589
00:28:31.640 --> 00:28:35.799
<v Speaker 2>historically wrote off as a chaotic, messy arena of colliding

590
00:28:35.880 --> 00:28:37.039
<v Speaker 2>irregular blobs.

591
00:28:37.240 --> 00:28:40.319
<v Speaker 3>But by looking past the optical spectrum. By aligning the

592
00:28:40.359 --> 00:28:44.799
<v Speaker 3>infrared stellar map from JWST with the submillimeter kinematic map

593
00:28:44.839 --> 00:28:48.400
<v Speaker 3>from al May, we revealed eight F twenty two point

594
00:28:48.559 --> 00:28:49.240
<v Speaker 3>a one.

595
00:28:49.359 --> 00:28:54.079
<v Speaker 2>A massive barred spiral galaxy boasting over sixty billion solar

596
00:28:54.119 --> 00:28:57.240
<v Speaker 2>masses of stars locked in a hyper stable rotation of

597
00:28:57.240 --> 00:28:59.279
<v Speaker 2>five hundred and thirty kilometers per second.

598
00:28:59.400 --> 00:29:02.519
<v Speaker 3>We saw that bypassed the violent demolition derby of galactic

599
00:29:02.559 --> 00:29:03.519
<v Speaker 3>mergers entirely.

600
00:29:03.799 --> 00:29:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Instead, it positioned itself at the nexus of the cosmic web,

601
00:29:06.960 --> 00:29:10.400
<v Speaker 2>utilizing the cold streams of intergalactic filments to continuously pipe

602
00:29:10.440 --> 00:29:14.480
<v Speaker 2>pristine gas and angular momentum directly into its expanding outer suburbs.

603
00:29:14.519 --> 00:29:17.839
<v Speaker 3>It is a masterpiece of fluid dynamics and gravitational.

604
00:29:17.279 --> 00:29:20.599
<v Speaker 2>Engineering, executing inside out growth while sitting in the densest,

605
00:29:20.680 --> 00:29:23.880
<v Speaker 2>most dangerous environment in the early universe, destined to eventually

606
00:29:23.880 --> 00:29:26.599
<v Speaker 2>be stripped of its fuel and retired as a massive elliptical.

607
00:29:26.799 --> 00:29:29.440
<v Speaker 3>The models of galaxy evolution are being actively rewritten to

608
00:29:29.440 --> 00:29:30.960
<v Speaker 3>accommodate this kind of efficiency.

609
00:29:31.160 --> 00:29:33.440
<v Speaker 2>But as we close out our discussion today, I want

610
00:29:33.480 --> 00:29:36.319
<v Speaker 2>to leave you the listener with a thought that pushes

611
00:29:36.359 --> 00:29:39.640
<v Speaker 2>beyond the macro scale astrophysics.

612
00:29:38.880 --> 00:29:40.400
<v Speaker 3>It's an important question to consider.

613
00:29:40.720 --> 00:29:43.119
<v Speaker 2>We have spent this time marveling at the fact that

614
00:29:43.160 --> 00:29:48.039
<v Speaker 2>the universe could organize chaotic gas into majestic, perfectly stable,

615
00:29:48.440 --> 00:29:52.160
<v Speaker 2>rotating spirals billions of years earlier than we ever expected.

616
00:29:52.880 --> 00:29:57.480
<v Speaker 2>The universe was building complex, ordered environments almost immediately after

617
00:29:57.480 --> 00:29:58.039
<v Speaker 2>the Big Bang.

618
00:29:58.240 --> 00:29:58.799
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it was.

619
00:29:59.119 --> 00:30:02.200
<v Speaker 2>But if the universe doing that on a macro galactic scale,

620
00:30:03.400 --> 00:30:04.880
<v Speaker 2>what else was it accelerating?

621
00:30:05.319 --> 00:30:10.119
<v Speaker 3>Stable metal, rich spinning galactic discs are the necessary cradles

622
00:30:10.119 --> 00:30:11.680
<v Speaker 3>for stellar systems like our own.

623
00:30:12.039 --> 00:30:15.559
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. They provide the stable orbits and the localized densities

624
00:30:15.559 --> 00:30:18.960
<v Speaker 2>required for heavier elements carbon, oxygen, iron to forge in

625
00:30:19.000 --> 00:30:22.240
<v Speaker 2>stellar cores, be ejected by supernovae, and mix into the

626
00:30:22.240 --> 00:30:26.759
<v Speaker 2>interstellar medium without being blasted away by continuous violent galaxy mergers.

627
00:30:26.839 --> 00:30:30.400
<v Speaker 3>If these highly ordered, chemically enriching environments existed as early

628
00:30:30.440 --> 00:30:32.640
<v Speaker 3>as seven hundred million to two billion years after the

629
00:30:32.680 --> 00:30:35.319
<v Speaker 3>Big Bang, the timeline for everything shifts.

630
00:30:35.720 --> 00:30:39.079
<v Speaker 2>Could the very first ingredients for complex chemistry, the heavy

631
00:30:39.119 --> 00:30:42.920
<v Speaker 2>molecules required for life, or perhaps even the early precursors

632
00:30:42.920 --> 00:30:46.279
<v Speaker 2>to rocky habitable worlds, have been quietly forming and churning

633
00:30:46.319 --> 00:30:49.400
<v Speaker 2>in the spiral arms of these ancient behemoths. If the

634
00:30:49.440 --> 00:30:52.279
<v Speaker 2>structural architecture of the universe matured this early, it really

635
00:30:52.319 --> 00:30:54.000
<v Speaker 2>makes you look up at the night sky and wonder

636
00:30:54.039 --> 00:30:56.519
<v Speaker 2>exactly how long the dark has been hiding the light.
