Speaker 1: Using free speech to free minds.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Monday, the twenty fifth
Speaker 1: of November. Here of our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well,
Speaker 1: today we're going to begin with war again because Biden,
Speaker 1: actually NATO keeps pushing and pushing. We're we're talking about
Speaker 1: the issue is they're also going to talk about our
Speaker 1: faith in large, complicated machines that don't work versus what
Speaker 1: we've just seen demonstrated from Russia. But don't let reality
Speaker 1: get in your way. Even Michael Moore ses it. So
Speaker 1: we're going to talk also about some other very bad
Speaker 1: picks that have come out of Trump and how the
Speaker 1: MAGA media is covering up their background. Well, they don't
Speaker 1: want to tell you about this stuff. Let's all just
Speaker 1: keep drinking the hopium that's there, and we'll talk about
Speaker 1: Thanksgiving the eggs, where are the eggs? Well, it turns
Speaker 1: out they're pushing this bird flu garbage again and it
Speaker 1: works out exactly like the original lockdown, the original PPP.
Speaker 1: The big guys get all the money and you get
Speaker 1: an empty nest. We'll be right back. Well, things are
Speaker 1: rapidly changing the landscape of the equipment that is used
Speaker 1: to fight war is rapidly changing. And it's not just
Speaker 1: the hypersonic missiles, of course, is also what is happening
Speaker 1: with autonomous killing machines, with the drones and other things
Speaker 1: like that. You know, Eric Schmidt is talking about how
Speaker 1: well nobody, the normies are not ready for what's coming
Speaker 1: with AI. He's kind of briefly refers to his involvement
Speaker 1: with autonomous killing machines. He said, I became an arms
Speaker 1: merchant because of Ukraine. Well, there you go. Always important
Speaker 1: to join a good cause, isn't it. Yeah, I'm sure
Speaker 1: that was what it was. It wasn't the money. It
Speaker 1: wasn't the tens hundreds of billions of dollars. No, it
Speaker 1: wasn't that at all. As a matter of fact, you
Speaker 1: look at this F thirty five system, the jet and
Speaker 1: as a system, I mean it's a major program with
Speaker 1: all the spare parts and all the rest of stuff.
Speaker 1: Two trillion dollars wasted, wasted. We're going to talk about
Speaker 1: what a Rube Goldberg contraption.
Speaker 2: That is.
Speaker 1: Equipment from previous wars, and this is like building, like
Speaker 1: building a big battleship that doesn't float. Just before World
Speaker 1: War II when the aircraft carriers replace the battleships. But
Speaker 1: what is happening in Ukraine has become a test ped
Speaker 1: for drone warfare. And now we see yet another robodog,
Speaker 1: the Terminator Dog. This one is amphibious. It can go
Speaker 1: over land and it can go through water. Sco up
Speaker 1: and show that picture there a little bit of it.
Speaker 1: The use of robotic dogs in our modern battlefields and
Speaker 1: Eastern Europe and the Middle East has expanded rapidly over
Speaker 1: the past decade. We've thoroughly documented their growing presence and proliferation,
Speaker 1: says zero Head. The latest of these nightmares from Black
Speaker 1: Mirror is the Ghost Robotics V sixty. This one can
Speaker 1: navigate through water, all while carrying a machine gun. And
Speaker 1: the people who put out this press release and are
Speaker 1: going to make a lot of money from it said,
Speaker 1: we're incredibly excited to share the next evolution of our system.
Speaker 1: The amphibious capabilities was centry Kinetic and ISSR payloads. Yeah,
Speaker 1: this is on a separate note, they said, we recently
Speaker 1: highlighted this wheeled robodog. Yeah, there he is going into
Speaker 1: the water. He's got floaters on how about that. I
Speaker 1: guess got to keep that Yeah, got to keep that
Speaker 1: gun above water. No, the gun goes underwater there. I guess.
Speaker 1: Now it's going to do a dog paddle. I guess
Speaker 1: that can paddle pretty quickly. I've never seen a dog
Speaker 1: move that fast. So, yeah, there's your nightmares right there,
Speaker 1: your worst nightmare. And we've seen something recently from China.
Speaker 1: This briefly showed that the other day, this wheeled robot,
Speaker 1: like a look at this thing, all terrain. Instead of
Speaker 1: four legs, it's got four wheels. It can roll on
Speaker 1: two legs, or it can use all four of them
Speaker 1: to go really fast, you know, just make it into
Speaker 1: a suicide drune. Look at that backflips and all the
Speaker 1: rest of this stuff. Yeah, this is the nightmare. And
Speaker 1: while this kind of stuff is being created and much
Speaker 1: much much more cheaply than our major complicated systems like
Speaker 1: the F thirty five, the F thirty five has now
Speaker 1: got a cooling crisis. I guess you could say coolier jets,
Speaker 1: but it's a real issue, and it's a major design flaw.
Speaker 1: And so the question is do we scrap this two
Speaker 1: trillion dollar F thirty five jet program, or do we
Speaker 1: keep pouring money into it as the landscape of war
Speaker 1: continues to change. And that's from China right there. That
Speaker 1: one that you saw. Benegan has a difficult decision. The
Speaker 1: thirty five's chronic crippling problems with overheating brought on by
Speaker 1: as insufficient cooling capacity. So should the US taxpayer pay
Speaker 1: for costly upgrade to the Stealth fighters cooling they'll handle
Speaker 1: its immediate needs, or should the US taxpayers pay for
Speaker 1: a few more expensive upgrades that theoretically could handle increased
Speaker 1: future cooling needs. Either way, we lose, right, nearly all
Speaker 1: the amount that we have spent on the covid UBI,
Speaker 1: you know, two trillion, we would pay three trillion or whatever.
Speaker 1: Who cares, right, But think about that, that was like
Speaker 1: the PPP welfare program to move the Overton window for
Speaker 1: all of us, those all over three trillion dollars. Just
Speaker 1: this one weapon system two trillion dollars, two trillion dollars.
Speaker 1: And will it be able to serve I'VE in an
Speaker 1: environment where there are hypersonic missiles? Big question? They don't
Speaker 1: even mention that. Just talk about this Rube Goldberg design
Speaker 1: and how it was designed by committee and how all
Speaker 1: these people had different parts in it. Having adequate cooling
Speaker 1: is very important because there's so much electronics built into it, avionics, radar,
Speaker 1: other electronic things. As a matter of fact, that was
Speaker 1: what was supposed to give it a superpower, all the electronics.
Speaker 1: So the electronics is not an afterthought. It was central
Speaker 1: to the design. And yet they didn't build in adequate
Speaker 1: cooling for that. Are we getting our money's worth out
Speaker 1: of the Pentagon? It never ends? Does It never ends?
Speaker 1: This is why we can't have nice things. This is
Speaker 1: why we don't win wars, because they're too focused on
Speaker 1: just feather betting these military industrial complex corporations. So various
Speaker 1: types of liquid cooling are necessary. You can't air conditioning, right,
Speaker 1: and so especially for the high powered radar stuff and
Speaker 1: the F thirty five. They advertise it as a flying supercomputer,
Speaker 1: and it has the most powerful radar and has the
Speaker 1: highest heat profile of any radars. Bottom line is, it
Speaker 1: takes a whole bunch of electronics to produce a whole
Speaker 1: bunch of heat to give the F thirty five its
Speaker 1: touted capabilities. And so from the beginning they didn't design
Speaker 1: it without a quick cooling. For example, they designed it
Speaker 1: with fourteen kilowatts of cooling power, but it was not
Speaker 1: declared fully operational until they added Block three F capabilities
Speaker 1: whatever that is. But it's some new avionics. They're required
Speaker 1: roughly thirty two kilowatts of cooling. They didn't even get
Speaker 1: to half of what was going to be required by
Speaker 1: that one system. Not to mention other issues, because the
Speaker 1: other issues are that it's got a very heavy, very
Speaker 1: hot engine. Of course, that's a big reliability issue for it.
Speaker 1: That's not what is causing this issue with the electronics.
Speaker 1: That's a separate issue and it's more of a reliability issue.
Speaker 1: But still had they weren't aware of what the requirements
Speaker 1: were going to be for the avionics when they put
Speaker 1: it in Lesson. They put in fourteen ks. They needed
Speaker 1: thirty two and it wasn't going to be useful for
Speaker 1: them unless they had that. It wasn't like there was
Speaker 1: another package. It had to have that Block three F upgrade,
Speaker 1: and so then they had to modify the F thirty
Speaker 1: five schooling system, and then that also had issues on
Speaker 1: the F thirty five engine, which was already struggling. They
Speaker 1: had ramped that up to try to juice more horsepower
Speaker 1: out of it to an absurd level. What it was
Speaker 1: supposed to be a relatively low cost, lighter compliment to
Speaker 1: large twin engined fighters like the two became a single
Speaker 1: engine fighter heavier than many twin engined fighters. I wonder
Speaker 1: how many swarms of autonomous killer robots you could have
Speaker 1: for two trillion dollars. And I wonder how these things
Speaker 1: are going to survive that maybe they can outrun them.
Speaker 1: Who knows, we'll wind up seeing you know, yesterday's technology
Speaker 1: taken to the ultimate versus new, cheaper, more effective technology.
Speaker 1: The massive weight of the F thirty five meant that
Speaker 1: Pratt and Whitney had to design an engine with far
Speaker 1: higher power to weight ratio than even what the state
Speaker 1: of the art F twenty two's engine was. It also
Speaker 1: meant that F thirty five had to undergo a draic
Speaker 1: draconic weight reduction program. So the massive increase in the
Speaker 1: turbine inlet temperature. They brought it up to thirty six
Speaker 1: hundred degrees fahrenheit. That is between nine hundred and eleven
Speaker 1: hundred degrees hotter than any of the other existing jet engines.
Speaker 1: Think about that. That's absolutely amazing. It is running about
Speaker 1: fifty percent hotter. So that meant that they've got reliability
Speaker 1: and longevity issues, and so the capabilities crammed into the
Speaker 1: F thirty five would have made sense on a two
Speaker 1: engine design. However, they decided they were going to make
Speaker 1: it a one engine design. This is that they had
Speaker 1: a vision for a thing, and then of course it
Speaker 1: gets the committee and it starts metamorphosizing into something that
Speaker 1: is very different. The F thirty five was going to
Speaker 1: be a low cost replacement for the F sixteen, a
Speaker 1: low cost replacement, or two trillion dollars into something it
Speaker 1: doesn't work. The F thirty five was released of an
Speaker 1: engine destined to be unreliable, with a cooling capacity that
Speaker 1: no experienced aerospace engineer could have credibly claimed would meet
Speaker 1: future cooling needs. The program costs is projected to be
Speaker 1: over two trillion dollars, which is four hundred percent more
Speaker 1: even if you adjust for inflation, four hundred percent more
Speaker 1: than what they'd estimated in two thousand and seven, and
Speaker 1: that's not because of inflation. Finally, there's no guarantee that
Speaker 1: desperately needed engine core upgrade, which is supposed to be
Speaker 1: delivered in twenty twenty nine. We're still five years away.
Speaker 1: We got a five year plan to fix this. Sounds
Speaker 1: like some communist country, doesn't it. There's no guarantee that'll
Speaker 1: be delivered on time or that it'll actually make the
Speaker 1: F thirty five engine reliable, you know, considering what they
Speaker 1: have done. So this is a good example of how
Speaker 1: the Pentagon is corrupt and captive to the military industrial complex,
Speaker 1: how it can't manage, how it is based on the
Speaker 1: false assumption that if we have bigger and better equipment,
Speaker 1: like the equipment we use in the last wars, that's
Speaker 1: going to do it for us. And they don't even
Speaker 1: pay attention to what is happening with this stuff. So
Speaker 1: I guess at the end of it, you know, I
Speaker 1: guess better equipment always wins the wars for us, doesn't it.
Speaker 1: We've had better equipment, We've won battles, but we lose wars.
Speaker 1: And that's a political Pentagon issue. But the having better
Speaker 1: equipment does not win the wars. I guess, General, you
Speaker 1: need to go fix your mass here.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: That's what's killing us. That kind of corruption, that kind
Speaker 1: of nonsense. Former Trump National Security advisor H. R. McMaster
Speaker 1: is now back, and he says the next couple of
Speaker 1: months are going to be really critical for Ukraine. Do
Speaker 1: you think that Trump is really going to be the
Speaker 1: priest president? You think that he's really going to fix
Speaker 1: all this stuff that is wrong. Frankly, I'm very skeptical,
Speaker 1: especially when you look at his first administration. This guy,
Speaker 1: Lieutenant General H. R. McMaster said yesterday, upcoming months will
Speaker 1: be really critical in determining the next phase of the
Speaker 1: war in Ukraine, as the President elect is expected to
Speaker 1: work to force a negotiated settlement when he enters his office.
Speaker 1: He doesn't like that. We got to figure out how
Speaker 1: we're going to win Ukraine. They were never going to
Speaker 1: win Ukraine. It's not possible for Ukraine to defeat Russia.
Speaker 1: So of course the US is going to be there directly,
Speaker 1: and that's what's going to get US involved in World
Speaker 1: War three. Even Michael Moore sees it and is calling
Speaker 1: out Biden on it. So Makemaster went on to CBS News,
Speaker 1: he's now pontificating there as a contributor. He said, Russia
Speaker 1: and Ukraine are both incentives to make as many games
Speaker 1: on the battlefield as they can before the new Trump
Speaker 1: administration comes in. That was obvious the day after the
Speaker 1: election right as soon as it was the votes are accounted,
Speaker 1: or they said so, they said as soon as Trump
Speaker 1: was declared the winner, it escalated on both sides. And
Speaker 1: we all knew what they were doing. They were trying
Speaker 1: to move the line of contact because they expected that
Speaker 1: was going to be frozen in any kind of negotiation.
Speaker 1: I mean, Master said, the dynamic is a real problem.
Speaker 1: Delivers a psychological blow to the Ukrainians to have Trump elected,
Speaker 1: So they have to have the confidence that they can't
Speaker 1: prevail this idiot. They can't prevail. They were never going
Speaker 1: to prevail. It's only going to be if we want
Speaker 1: to go into to war directly with Russia. He said, So,
Speaker 1: I think what happens is so many people have taken
Speaker 1: such a meopic view of Ukraine that they've misunderstood Putin's
Speaker 1: intentions and how consequential the war is to our interests
Speaker 1: across the world. This is the guy that Trump hired
Speaker 1: his first adminstration. What are our interests across the world?
Speaker 1: Please define that. See this is not about national security,
Speaker 1: This is not about making Americans secure. This is about
Speaker 1: their empire. I want nothing to do with it. I
Speaker 1: despise their empire, Their empire of lies and waste and death,
Speaker 1: all for their lines on a map. I'm disgusted with
Speaker 1: the US military. He argued. The nominees for the Director
Speaker 1: of National Intelligence and Defense Secretary should be asked key
Speaker 1: questions of how they will quote reconcile peace through strength,
Speaker 1: because they've got to beat Putin. He says, what do
Speaker 1: they think motivates and drives and constrains Putin? What do
Speaker 1: you think motivates and drives and constrains the US government?
Speaker 1: Nothing constrains them except reality, and they're going to get
Speaker 1: a big dose of that. McMaster said that Gabbard has
Speaker 1: a fundamental misunderstanding about what motivates Putin. She says, they've
Speaker 1: got to disabuse themselves of this strange affection for Putin.
Speaker 1: Will you people in the Pentagon need to disabuse yourself
Speaker 1: with a strange affection for war and death and for
Speaker 1: your idea that you're going to be the rulers of
Speaker 1: the world. That's disgusting. Nothing is more Unamerican than the Pentagon,
Speaker 1: and a Graham is more like it. Since when did
Speaker 1: America decide that this has to be the ruler of
Speaker 1: the world. I'm disgusted with this country. Michael Moore rips
Speaker 1: Joe Biden going out in a blaze of horror. He said,
Speaker 1: he's pushing us right into World War three. Even Michael
Speaker 1: Moore can see it. Everybody is saying this all over
Speaker 1: the world. We've got people in every country that seeing this.
Speaker 1: He published a Dear Joe letter and in it he says,
Speaker 1: instead of using your precious little time left to do
Speaker 1: something to help the American people, your first action after
Speaker 1: Trump won was to fast track the delivery of over
Speaker 1: six billion dollars in weapons to Ukraine. Then you called
Speaker 1: up Zelenski and gave him the green light to start
Speaker 1: firing long range ballistic missiles into a country with a
Speaker 1: massive amount of nuclear weapons, Russia. Then, as if that
Speaker 1: weren't enough carnage for one week, you authorize the use
Speaker 1: of anti personnel land mines in Russia. Land minds, Joe, Seriously,
Speaker 1: this is your legacy. This is how you want to
Speaker 1: go out in a blaze of horror, Like, if Joe's
Speaker 1: got to go, we all got to go with him,
Speaker 1: right right into World War three. Well, he's absolutely right.
Speaker 1: He forgot one thing. He forgot the new military base,
Speaker 1: the ballistic missile base that was put In Poland and
Speaker 1: opened up November thirteenth. More pointed out the US as
Speaker 1: that's the one that Putin threatened with this new hypersonic missile.
Speaker 1: So oh yeah, that new missile base that you put there,
Speaker 1: you know, kind of like Khrushchev wanted to do in Cuba. Well,
Speaker 1: I got a hypersonic missile for that, if we want
Speaker 1: to use it. More pointed out of the US had
Speaker 1: spent a billion dollars in efforts to remove land mines
Speaker 1: from war torn places such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Laos,
Speaker 1: and Cambodia, adding that these are quote the places we
Speaker 1: invade and then we leave our land mines behind. He said,
Speaker 1: Vietnam was fifty years ago, Joe, and kids today in
Speaker 1: Southeast Asia are still getting their arms blown off by
Speaker 1: our land mines. That's your legacy, Joe, this is what
Speaker 1: you are doing. Yeah, legacy. Joe hasn't got a leg
Speaker 1: to stand on with this stuff, and neither are the kids.
Speaker 1: They're going to be maimed or killed by these land
Speaker 1: mines left behind and many other people. It's not just kids.
Speaker 1: Kids are drawn to them to play with them, they're curious,
Speaker 1: but it kills other people, not just kids, said the
Speaker 1: White House even lobbied against nineteen Democrat senators who moved
Speaker 1: to block Biden's weapon shipments to Israel. He said, Biden's
Speaker 1: administration accused these senators of being Hammas supporters. He said,
Speaker 1: maybe you should stop arming foreign wars and leave that
Speaker 1: to the next guy. He said, maybe you should focus
Speaker 1: on things that matter to Americans and make some real
Speaker 1: and powerful changes in the last two months that you've
Speaker 1: got left. Then he pivots into the absurd. He says,
Speaker 1: just you need to put the er, you need to
Speaker 1: publish it in the Constitution. It's like what he thinks
Speaker 1: that because they've had a sufficient number of states eventually
Speaker 1: authorize the Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution, that they
Speaker 1: did it legitimately. However, the language of the amendment stated
Speaker 1: that ratification that began in eighteen seventy four had seven
Speaker 1: years time limit, and when that seven years is up,
Speaker 1: only thirty five of the required thirty eight states had
Speaker 1: ratified it, and so they said, well, you can't put
Speaker 1: a tent time limit on it, except there's been two
Speaker 1: Supreme Court cases that say you can. So they've continued
Speaker 1: to ratify these things, but Anyway, getting back to the
Speaker 1: reality of war, you have the former Ukrainian commander in
Speaker 1: chief is now ambassador to the UK. And of course Kirstarma,
Speaker 1: the new Socialist, is pushing it this World War three
Speaker 1: as hard as Biden, the old Socialist is doing. And
Speaker 1: it may be because this guy is there. This guy's
Speaker 1: a real warmonger. He's the ambassador now from Ukraine to
Speaker 1: Great Britain. He says World War three has begun, and
Speaker 1: he makes a case that it has begun, because he said,
Speaker 1: it is an international conflict. We have Iranian drones, we
Speaker 1: have North Korean missiles, and we have Chinese shells being
Speaker 1: used by the Russians. Well, we have equipment. The Ukrainians
Speaker 1: are using equipment from America, from the UK, from France
Speaker 1: and many other places as well, Germany, so forth. And
Speaker 1: that happened before the Iranian drones or the North Korean
Speaker 1: missiles or troops, or the Chinese shells by were brought
Speaker 1: into Russia. So who is it that started World War Three?
Speaker 1: Here appearing to lobby for even more Western weaponry, he said,
Speaker 1: you can still stop here on the territory of Ukraine.
Speaker 1: But he says, if you don't stop them you know,
Speaker 1: this is the domino theory, right, Domino theory they've used
Speaker 1: for war after war, the big lie that they just
Speaker 1: keep using because guess what, it works. It always works.
Speaker 1: Former Ukrainian commander who now serves as an ambassador to Britain,
Speaker 1: and he is telling you no, he says, Kir Starmer,
Speaker 1: the Prime Minster in Britain says no, we're not at war.
Speaker 1: When he was asked, but we cannot allow Putin to
Speaker 1: win this war. Oh so then we are at war now.
Speaker 1: One of the things that you've heard over and over again,
Speaker 1: I've talked about how Lindsay Graham and Chris Christie say, well,
Speaker 1: this is good. We're depleting Russia's war machine and they're
Speaker 1: using up all their missiles and all this other stuff.
Speaker 1: We just got to keep this going, says oh Lindsay.
Speaker 1: Chris Christie same thing, he says, look at this, Look
Speaker 1: at how much weaponry and money they've thrown into this thing.
Speaker 1: We need to double down on this. Well, how much
Speaker 1: weaponry and money have we thrown into this? And we've
Speaker 1: got the naval commander of the Pacific, the endo Pacific
Speaker 1: Command is Admiral Sam Papero. He told a Brookings Institute
Speaker 1: audience earlier this week that earlier in the war, the
Speaker 1: US was shipping less valuable weaponry to Ukraine, which didn't
Speaker 1: deeply impact our readiness for big global threats like China.
Speaker 1: But more advanced defense tech is currently being shipped and
Speaker 1: this now presents a serious polem for the United States
Speaker 1: long term defense needs. So wait a minute, our defense
Speaker 1: stocks are being taken down as well as Russia's. Huh,
Speaker 1: how's that? How's that going for us? These guys are brilliant,
Speaker 1: aren't they? He said, Now, with some of the Patriots
Speaker 1: missiles that have been employed, some of the air to
Speaker 1: air missiles that have been employed, it's now eating into stock,
Speaker 1: and he said, to say otherwise would be dishonest. He said,
Speaker 1: it imposes costs on the readiness of America to respond
Speaker 1: in the end of Pacific region, which is the most
Speaker 1: stressing theater for the quantity and quality of munitions, because
Speaker 1: China is the most capable potential adversary in the world.
Speaker 1: He said, None of these weapons are specific to any
Speaker 1: particular theater of war, but you can't resist reposition them
Speaker 1: easily or in a timely manner. So if these things
Speaker 1: are setting in Ukraine and there's a war with China.
Speaker 1: Well you don't have them, right. They called for the
Speaker 1: depleted weaponry to be restored, and then some he said,
Speaker 1: there we go, more profits for the military industrial complex.
Speaker 1: Put them on steroids. European countries have also suffered the
Speaker 1: same problem of deleted domestic stockpiles. Now, so US and
Speaker 1: European officials have been discussing giving Ukraine nuclear weapons. Well,
Speaker 1: it seems like it was just yesterday. That was a
Speaker 1: big escalation to give them tanks. There's a big escalation,
Speaker 1: to give them jets. Then it was a big escalation
Speaker 1: to give them long range missiles. But no worry, we're
Speaker 1: not going to use those. Then they're using them. Just
Speaker 1: keep going. So now we're going to give them nuclear weapon.
Speaker 1: Don't worry, We're not going to use him, except when
Speaker 1: they do. According to The New York Times, US and
Speaker 1: European officials have discussed a range of options they believe
Speaker 1: will deter Russia from taking more Ukrainian territory, including nuclear
Speaker 1: weapons given to the Madman and Kiev Zelensky. He wants
Speaker 1: a nuclear war. This guy is absolutely insane. He's a puppet.
Speaker 1: He's just a puppet that they put in there, but
Speaker 1: he really wants it, desperate to bolster Ukraine standing in
Speaker 1: the war. Before the transition of power in January, the
Speaker 1: twentieth of the Biden administration is looking at a range
Speaker 1: of serious escalations, a deterrence such as stypiling nuclear weapons,
Speaker 1: and so the belief that Trump and his incoming Director
Speaker 1: of National Intelligence Telsey Gabbard, will take a more favorable
Speaker 1: stance on Russia. However, Trump proved to be a Russia
Speaker 1: hawk during the first administration. He ramped up sanctions on Moscow,
Speaker 1: he provided leth little arms to Ukraine, and he expelled
Speaker 1: a large number of Russian diplomats from the US. You know,
Speaker 1: all of his talk that was just you know, red
Speaker 1: meat to the MAGA people about leaving NATO. Well, no,
Speaker 1: if you guys don't get up your weapons, you know,
Speaker 1: start you know, contributing more to NATO, which just maybe
Speaker 1: we'll just get out of it. I don't know. That
Speaker 1: was just a lot of bluster, and that was just
Speaker 1: to push them to up the ante because they knew
Speaker 1: this was coming. That's the key thing I've played so
Speaker 1: many times. Alexeiy Aristovich, who was you know, Zelenski got
Speaker 1: elected on a on a campaign of peace. Does that
Speaker 1: sound familiar. We've already seen that with Woodrow Wilson. We've
Speaker 1: already seen that with FDR. Maybe we're going to see
Speaker 1: it again with Trump. Well, Zelenski got elected in twenty nineteen,
Speaker 1: and when Alexey Aristovich went as a peace embassy and
Speaker 1: came and negotiator and came back and talked to the
Speaker 1: press there, and so with this chance, as he said nothing,
Speaker 1: he says, as a matter of fay, it's going to get
Speaker 1: worse in three years. In three years twenty twenty two,
Speaker 1: we will be at war with Russia. Howd they know that?
Speaker 1: How did they know that? Because you see, there was
Speaker 1: already war. He ran in a campaign a piece, because
Speaker 1: in twenty nineteen they had already been in a civil war.
Speaker 1: The Kiev government had already been shelling for five years.
Speaker 1: They're civilians who wanted to leave and attach themselves to Russia.
Speaker 1: So yeah, they seem to know all this stuff. And
Speaker 1: Trump is there saying you need to arm up, and
Speaker 1: they did, and so he's kind of laying the groundwork
Speaker 1: for it, wasn't he? And September Putin said he preferred
Speaker 1: Lalla to win the White house. I bet he did
Speaker 1: play a game a chest with Laala. She can't handle
Speaker 1: take tac toe. Trump has imposed as many sanctions on Russia,
Speaker 1: he said, as any president ever imposed before. And if
Speaker 1: Harris is doing well, perhaps you'll refrain from such actions.
Speaker 1: Well again, that is guys, that's probably his syop game.
Speaker 1: He's playing with people. You know, she would just be
Speaker 1: a puppet figurehead. It'd be the same people that are
Speaker 1: running everything now. She was to win, but after they
Speaker 1: launched this hypersonic missile last week, nobody saw it coming,
Speaker 1: nobody had a defense for it. And Putin said, oh,
Speaker 1: and by the way, we can get to any European capital.
Speaker 1: We've got enough range with this. It has conventional weapons,
Speaker 1: but it also has nuclear weapons, and it travels at
Speaker 1: over mock ten, which is faster than a speeding bullet. See,
Speaker 1: it's as fast as Superman. So Eastern European capitals could
Speaker 1: be hitting a matter of just a few minutes. And
Speaker 1: so they put this video out to show the missile range.
Speaker 1: And so there you go, there the missiles being fired,
Speaker 1: and go to warsaw Berlin at Paris and London. So
Speaker 1: you got Warsaw in twelve minutes. Berlin in fifteen minutes,
Speaker 1: Paris and London in twenty minutes from their location deep
Speaker 1: inside Russia, all the way across Europe twenty minutes. That's
Speaker 1: how fast this thing is. And they're putting this up
Speaker 1: there to they think about us, right, you have no
Speaker 1: defense against this, and we can be there within twelve
Speaker 1: to twenty minutes. As a matter of fact, why warsaw, Well,
Speaker 1: that's where that new anti missile base is, the anti
Speaker 1: missile base that opened up on November thirteenth, that doesn't
Speaker 1: have any defense against this missile. So interesting thing is that,
Speaker 1: you know, we looked at this strange video footage of
Speaker 1: this the new missile thing, and it turns out that
Speaker 1: they put it had six warheads, independent warheads. And if
Speaker 1: you look at this video that showed the new Russian weapon,
Speaker 1: count these weird looking explosions here one, two, three, four, five, six.
Speaker 1: Looks like the video footage was of the hypersonic thing.
Speaker 1: Really strange, isn't It Almost looked like some kind of
Speaker 1: a laser weapon being released there. But you know, we
Speaker 1: don't want to back down. We're going to bullheaded proceed forward.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, when these in the last
Speaker 1: stage which you were seeing right there is it's blasting
Speaker 1: through it's going at mock eleven, eleven times the speed
Speaker 1: of sound, cutting edge hypersonic missile for which there's no
Speaker 1: defensive intercept capability. And you know, like I said, it
Speaker 1: looked like some kind of a laser thing that was there.
Speaker 1: But one of the reasons that it's not just at
Speaker 1: speed that makes it so difficult for them to defend against,
Speaker 1: but because it's traveling so fast, it creates with the
Speaker 1: going through the air that quickly it gets like a plasma,
Speaker 1: corona or whatever the front of it. And maybe that's
Speaker 1: what you're seeing there, because then it accelerates. That's just
Speaker 1: when it's flying at mock ten. Then at the last
Speaker 1: age it gets even faster mick eleven. So maybe it's
Speaker 1: that plasma, that corona that's around it. The plasma is
Speaker 1: what absorbs the radar, makes it invisible to radar. As
Speaker 1: well as being super fast, and as he pointed out,
Speaker 1: it's capable carrying a nuclear warhead as well. And so
Speaker 1: the Defense Minister, foreign Minister of Foreign Minister, not Defense
Speaker 1: Minister of Russia, Dmitry Peskov. So the key message is
Speaker 1: that the reckless decisions and actions of Western countries which
Speaker 1: produce missiles supply them to Ukraine subsequently take part in
Speaker 1: carrying out strikes on Russian territory cannot go unanswered. Anyone,
Speaker 1: says said they subsequently take part in carrying out these strikes.
Speaker 1: As everybody's pointed out, the US has to be involved
Speaker 1: with the targeting and the operation of these things, and
Speaker 1: so it is the US that is actually firing those missiles,
Speaker 1: and to the US missiles with US personnel firing those
Speaker 1: missiles into Russia. The West does not have missiles that
Speaker 1: fly at such speed or hypersonic missiles at all, he said.
Speaker 1: Although the US has repeatedly boasted that it has such missiles,
Speaker 1: it has never demonstrated a missile flight. They appeared to
Speaker 1: show missiles that flew at a supersonic speed of five
Speaker 1: and a half times the speed of sound Mack five
Speaker 1: point five. However, hypersonic speed begins at Mock six to seven.
Speaker 1: Moon of Alabama also agrees calls it a huge game changer.
Speaker 1: He said the surprising and successful demonstration of such an
Speaker 1: enormous capability as a wake up call for European strategists.
Speaker 1: Do you think they'll wake up. Are they going to
Speaker 1: sleepwalk into World War three? Having been defeated in the
Speaker 1: fight for commodities and the dom Bass region they push
Speaker 1: were extending the reach of their weapons into Russia. Now
Speaker 1: think about that, having been defeated in the fight for commodities,
Speaker 1: the fight for commodities, It's like Lindsay Graham say, they
Speaker 1: got like ten twelve trillion dollars worth of commodity. They're
Speaker 1: minerals and resources, that type of stuff. We can't let
Speaker 1: putin have that. We got to have it right, is
Speaker 1: that we're fighting for Well, you know, with that kind
Speaker 1: of money, we could buy three or four more failed
Speaker 1: jets systems. But yeah, ten to twelve trillion dollars in
Speaker 1: the rich commodities rich area of the dom Bass. Putting
Speaker 1: the mind of the West on Sunday said, we believe
Speaker 1: the US made a mistake by UNIL not only destroying
Speaker 1: the I and F Treaty in twenty nineteen under a
Speaker 1: far fetched pretext, that's the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty, and
Speaker 1: that's what this new missile would fall into with its range.
Speaker 1: They have long range, medium that type thing. So they
Speaker 1: had a treaty about the medium range missiles, which this
Speaker 1: would have been included in But in twenty nineteen, let's
Speaker 1: see when was Trump president. Oh yeah, that's right, twenty nineteen.
Speaker 1: Trump got out of the I and F treaty, and
Speaker 1: so he said, we don't even have a treaty that
Speaker 1: you know, you can say that we've violated. You got
Speaker 1: out of that treaty, he said, And yet we can't
Speaker 1: seem to figure out how to get out of the
Speaker 1: Paris Treaty. We can get out of a treaty that
Speaker 1: is there to reduce weapons because we want to have
Speaker 1: more weapons for the military industrial complex to sell us,
Speaker 1: But we can't get out of the Paris client i'm
Speaker 1: a treaty because you know that war against us by
Speaker 1: these green washed billionaires, people like Elon Musk that now
Speaker 1: run Trump. We got to keep that going. The Pentagon
Speaker 1: has confirmed that the US has was warned in advance
Speaker 1: about the ERECTIONNIC missile attack via nuclear security channels, but
Speaker 1: the US didn't tell the EU. Let that sink in Europeans. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we knew about that. We didn't tell you. This is
Speaker 1: old lion, he says on Twitter. He says, notice that
Speaker 1: they didn't warn the EU. So the pucker factor in
Speaker 1: the EU watching that ICBM launch must have been intense.
Speaker 1: Can you imagine their reaction? Yeah, It's always great the
Speaker 1: way we treat our allies, isn't it. This week Ukraine
Speaker 1: used America made missiles and the British use their storm
Speaker 1: Shadow cruise missile to strike into Russia. Putin said these
Speaker 1: attacks demonstrate the West intent to transform the Ukrainian conflict
Speaker 1: into a global war and the stress of these weapons
Speaker 1: could not be used without the direct involvement of US
Speaker 1: and NATO military. He said it was not Russia a
Speaker 1: US that destroyed the system of international security, the inf
Speaker 1: Treaty and other agreements. He accused of the US of
Speaker 1: clinging to the hegemony at the expense of global stability.
Speaker 1: And so the US is now adjusting its nuclear deterrence strategy,
Speaker 1: ramping it up. And you know, I've had Joel Skousen
Speaker 1: on several times and for the longest time. Joel Skousen
Speaker 1: has said for years, even before this independent program, even
Speaker 1: when I was at Info Wars, he's consistently said that
Speaker 1: the US wants to provoke a nuclear attack because they
Speaker 1: believe that they can absorb the first strike in their bunkers,
Speaker 1: while the rest of us die and they want that.
Speaker 1: Starting to look like he was absolutely right, because you
Speaker 1: will absorb the first strike of a nuclear war with
Speaker 1: these hypersonic missiles. There anything you're going to do about it.
Speaker 1: They know that and they want it because these people
Speaker 1: are about depopulating the world. Whether it's or the bioweapon
Speaker 1: shot not a gain of function, a bioweapon shot, or
Speaker 1: whether it's provoked nuclear war, they want to absorb the
Speaker 1: first strike, or more accurately, to have US absorb it.
Speaker 1: And so we continue on our bloated, failed programs like
Speaker 1: the F thirty five, while Russia demonstrates the hypersonic missile,
Speaker 1: and the US and the American and European populations are
Speaker 1: kind of sleepwalking into this. I don't know the politicians are.
Speaker 1: I think maybe they know exactly what they're doing. We're
Speaker 1: gonna take a quick break and we'll come back and
Speaker 1: read your comments. We'll be right back.
Speaker 3: M h m hm.
Speaker 4: H to look at.
Speaker 3: Fat.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: All right, a stealth patriot. Thank you for the tip.
Speaker 1: I appreciate that. So the old F fifteen has never
Speaker 1: been shot down in combat? Not good enough? I guess
Speaker 1: they have to take something that works well, change it,
Speaker 1: screw everything up like Harley Davidson does with their motorcycles,
Speaker 1: and let the car companies do. Right, what have they done?
Speaker 1: For the most part, They've added a bunch of tech
Speaker 1: that we don't really need in the cars, making it
Speaker 1: incredibly expensive. And wait, scroll up a little bit here.
Speaker 1: There's one I wanted to get and it was junk
Speaker 1: Silver said. It's not a fighter jet. It's a jobs program.
Speaker 1: It's a welfare corporate welfare program, is what it is.
Speaker 1: And this is what they do. They add compleatent needless
Speaker 1: complexity to systems in order to ramp up the cost.
Speaker 1: That is really what they're doing. So that's ay or
Speaker 1: one two three, He says, Biden is taking U straight
Speaker 1: into war without the approval of Congress. That's the point
Speaker 1: that Thomas Massey made exactly right, the very thing he
Speaker 1: spoke against and also avowed to impeach any president that
Speaker 1: did it. Go figure, that's right, I played it on Friday.
Speaker 1: Wait a minute, you can't, and Thomas Massey said, we
Speaker 1: need to impeach this guy. Everybody pushed by again, impeach him,
Speaker 1: He says, well, look at even Biden said this was
Speaker 1: that back in two thousand and seven, I think, and
Speaker 1: that was when they were trying to push us into
Speaker 1: an Iran war. Funny how things don't change. Jerry Alatallo says,
Speaker 1: fascist eugenesis m R and A bioweapons mass murderers know
Speaker 1: their time is running out, and they've concluded global wars
Speaker 1: their sole means for escaping Nurremberg style prosecutions and death sentences. Well,
Speaker 1: I agree. I think deep population has always been a
Speaker 1: part of this agenda. And when you go back and
Speaker 1: you look at Paul Erlik talking in the late nineteen
Speaker 1: sixties the population bomb. We got to get rid of
Speaker 1: the population. How do we do it? Well, wars are
Speaker 1: pretty good, but even better than that is disease. Well,
Speaker 1: I don't think that they engineered anything. I know they
Speaker 1: didn't engineer anything, because it just didn't. If they had
Speaker 1: engineered something, it would have been completely different, folks. It
Speaker 1: would have seen everybody dying in twenty twenty. We had
Speaker 1: an increase in twenty twenty because now we know they
Speaker 1: were killing people in hospitals and Trump was paying them
Speaker 1: to kill people in hospitals, paying them through CMS, the
Speaker 1: same organization that he just put this pro lockdown, pro
Speaker 1: vaccine stooge doctor Oz in charge of and we're going
Speaker 1: to get to that here in terms of the personnel,
Speaker 1: and so yeah, you can you know, the disease was
Speaker 1: the shot. The disease was the shot. All let's talk
Speaker 1: about the gain of function and WU hand lab and
Speaker 1: all the rest of the stuff. That's a red herring,
Speaker 1: that is a red hearing. Soilent Goy says, US has
Speaker 1: nothing to leverage Russia. America bombed their pipeline, armed, their enemy,
Speaker 1: tries to sanction them, constantly lies to them. Why would
Speaker 1: Russia concede anything? And they've announced that their goal is
Speaker 1: to have regime change, In other words, they want to
Speaker 1: take over Russia. This is an existential threat to Putin,
Speaker 1: if not a threat to Russia. So why would he
Speaker 1: negotiate with anything? A Guin fan says, speaking to don't
Speaker 1: frag me Bross. Americans also do not have a history
Speaker 1: of worrying about hostile foreign armies. They can come here
Speaker 1: and wipe out people's We're in a bubble and that's
Speaker 1: my design. Well, if we look at we look at
Speaker 1: the new capability, we will see what's going to happen
Speaker 1: with that little Ford schoolhouse talking about eggs. You know
Speaker 1: we're going to get to that as well. Are terribly
Speaker 1: expensive here, and just in time for our chickens to
Speaker 1: go dormant for the winter, and my water glass supply
Speaker 1: is low. Yeah, David Strauss, I've heard David mentioned the
Speaker 1: Degle report a few times on here, but I've seen
Speaker 1: very little about it in alternative news circles. What does
Speaker 1: everyone think about this? Well, I'll tell you what I
Speaker 1: think about it. I think that was put out by
Speaker 1: the Degle who worked for the Pentagon, that type of thing.
Speaker 1: I think that they are. They have this compulsion because
Speaker 1: they're evil Satanists. They have this compulsion to tell you
Speaker 1: what they're going to do, they really do, And I
Speaker 1: think that that was a declaration of what they intended
Speaker 1: to do. I don't think that was just some guys
Speaker 1: weekend project or something. I think that's exactly what they
Speaker 1: designed to do, the biggest population reductions here in the US.
Speaker 1: Audi Modern Retro Radio he says, Hey, all tomorrow, I'm
Speaker 1: interviewing Mark Farner of Grand Funk Railroad and that'll run
Speaker 1: on my station. Say well, that's cool, it's cool. Modern
Speaker 1: Retro Radio dot Com that's where you can find. That's
Speaker 1: that's good to know. Let's talk a little bit about
Speaker 1: some of Trump's picks. And I think that this is
Speaker 1: important because it is an absolute betrayal of everything that
Speaker 1: MAGA said that they want it. You know, MAGA doesn't
Speaker 1: like the vaccine. And you've got all these people like
Speaker 1: Alex Jones and Wayne Allen Root and many others. WorldNetDaily
Speaker 1: pushed really hard against the vaccine. After initially Alex told people,
Speaker 1: don't worry about it. You know, this is not the
Speaker 1: bad Gates vaccine. This is Trump is doing this. He
Speaker 1: knows what he's doing. It is forty chess. It's just
Speaker 1: sugar water with you know, some aluminum and some mercury
Speaker 1: and things like that. I've played that clip a lot
Speaker 1: of times for you. I'm not going to play it again.
Speaker 1: And he's spent twenty years telling people that how bad
Speaker 1: the adjuvents of aluminum and mercury for people. Just take it.
Speaker 1: You can do it for Trump and don't worry about this.
Speaker 1: It's not the bad Gays vaccine. Then he flipped and
Speaker 1: they started warning everybody about it. That's pretty consistent across
Speaker 1: the MAGA media, because you you know, they were very
Speaker 1: people were very skeptical about it, and Trump, I've played
Speaker 1: it for you many times. My people, my people don't
Speaker 1: like the vaccine, they should love it. I'm the father
Speaker 1: of the vaccine, all the rest of stuff. Well, now
Speaker 1: they had this double think where they held these mutually
Speaker 1: exclusive ideas that they don't like the vaccine, but they
Speaker 1: love the father of the vaccine. And now that he's
Speaker 1: getting in, he is putting in a lot of pro vaccine,
Speaker 1: pro lockdown people in. But listen to this headline from Breitbart,
Speaker 1: because I thought this was the most amazing thing about it.
Speaker 1: Listen to how Breitbart outright lies to people. It's amazing.
Speaker 1: They're like Pravda or it's Vestia, just outright lie. And
Speaker 1: there's so much of the magamedia. They will either not
Speaker 1: talk about the background of these people, or they'll deliberately
Speaker 1: spin it and misrepresent what is happening. The headline. Pull
Speaker 1: it up there, Donald Trump picks anti lockdown vaccine skeptic
Speaker 1: healthcare nominees. Nothing could be further from the truth, Breitbart,
Speaker 1: and you ought to know it, and your readers need
Speaker 1: to know this. You know, Nick Nolty, who had been
Speaker 1: a former editor I think, but now he's kind of
Speaker 1: semi retired. I guess he just does movies. But he
Speaker 1: was a big, big vaccine promoter promoter during all this stuff,
Speaker 1: and he was getting ratioed with the comments go back
Speaker 1: and report on movies. You don't know anything of what
Speaker 1: you're talking about, the vaccines that you're talking about. President,
Speaker 1: this is Breitbart. President like Donald Trump nominated many leading
Speaker 1: healthcare experts who opposed coronavirus era lockdowns and focused on
Speaker 1: ending chronic illness, and he and one they want to
Speaker 1: overhaul America's healthcare corporate bureaucracies. Nothing could be further from
Speaker 1: the truth. So they first of all, talked about doctor
Speaker 1: Marty Mcarey for the FDA, the transplant surgeon frequently questioned
Speaker 1: the efficacy of lockdowns and enforcing mask wearing for children.
Speaker 1: Most of these people that they've got. What they questioned
Speaker 1: was the mandates, but they cheered the vaccine. That's the reality,
Speaker 1: bright Bart. They questioned the mandates because the mandates were
Speaker 1: coming from Biden. If the mandates had come from Trump,
Speaker 1: they wouldn't question it. As a matter of fact, the
Speaker 1: military mandates did come from Trumps. Jason Barker has pointed
Speaker 1: out he was fighting him. He was in the military.
Speaker 1: He said he knew Trump before he you know, in December,
Speaker 1: I said, yeah, we're going to force a military to
Speaker 1: get that's when it gets its emergency use authorization. And
Speaker 1: so it was the same program that Biden had. And
Speaker 1: of course, so many people who support this stuff will
Speaker 1: come out and say, well, it wasn't mandated, it was coursed,
Speaker 1: and it's all on you if you took it. I
Speaker 1: am so sick of that. I am so sick of
Speaker 1: people who are fraudulently lied to by the media and
Speaker 1: by the medical community and by the pharmaceutical companies, and
Speaker 1: then when they are lied to and then they're threatened
Speaker 1: with their job and they take it, and you say, well,
Speaker 1: it's not my problem, that's Laura Lumer, right, not my problem.
Speaker 1: I didn't take that. And I saw somebody else on
Speaker 1: Twitter recently doing that, and it's fighting with everybody. Well,
Speaker 1: I knew better. It's their fault. So fraud and coercion
Speaker 1: and lies outright lies are not a problem. So one
Speaker 1: reason public health officials may be afraid to acknowledge the
Speaker 1: effectiveness of natural immunity, said Marty McCarey, is they fear
Speaker 1: that it'll to some to choose getting the infection over vaccination.
Speaker 1: Now listen to this. He then says, that's a legitimate concern,
Speaker 1: and others you want people to get the vaccine, right, Oh, well,
Speaker 1: you know he opposed Biden's vaccine mandates, but he's going
Speaker 1: to do everything to lie to you fraudulently about these vaccines.
Speaker 1: He said, we can encourage all Americans to get vaccinated
Speaker 1: while still being honest about the data. No, you can't,
Speaker 1: because if you were honest about the data, and he's
Speaker 1: saying this stuff in twenty twenty one, if you were
Speaker 1: honest about the data, we knew just a couple of
Speaker 1: weeks in this look at this, we got more adverse
Speaker 1: effects and people dying reported into the various database, which
Speaker 1: they've been discouraged from reporting. We've got more people in
Speaker 1: there than we've had with all the other vaccines combined
Speaker 1: for five years, and then for ten years, and then
Speaker 1: for twenty years, then for the entire time, and that
Speaker 1: was ramping up very rapidly. Within a couple of months,
Speaker 1: we saw how dangerous this was. Never had had a
Speaker 1: vaccine quote unquote that had this kind of adverse stuff
Speaker 1: and he's either there so we can encourage all Americans
Speaker 1: to get vaccinated while still being honest about the data. No,
Speaker 1: this guy who works for Johns Hopkins has the lot
Speaker 1: of people about that, and then we've got more to
Speaker 1: say about him. Another pick that was released here with
Speaker 1: doctor Jeannette Nae shy Watt. I don't know her, but
Speaker 1: I don't know how to pronounce their name. It came
Speaker 1: from another country seeing her family. A fierce advocate, says Trump.
Speaker 1: A fierce advocate and strong communications communicator rather for preventive
Speaker 1: medicine and public health. She has committed to ensuring that
Speaker 1: Americans have access to affordable, quality health care and believes
Speaker 1: in empowering individuals to take charge of their health to
Speaker 1: live longer, healthier lives. Trump said in his statement, So
Speaker 1: here's the truth about this woman. Here. She was on
Speaker 1: Fox News, brought on there multiple times to talk about
Speaker 1: the vaccine. She said, vaccine hesitancy is a global threat.
Speaker 1: If it's a global threat, I guess you can mandate
Speaker 1: it for people, right. So, she criticized the vaccine mandates
Speaker 1: when it was Biden, but she had previously when she
Speaker 1: was part of the Trump administration, said vaccine hesitancy is
Speaker 1: a global threat, so again pushing it with lies, just
Speaker 1: like McCarey dead and still does. And she also had
Speaker 1: this to say, let's see, we're going to get to
Speaker 1: that in a moment. Hang on. So doctor Oz, doctor
Speaker 1: Oz of course at CMS, and we talked about him
Speaker 1: last week, pushing microchips, pushing this idea that kids are
Speaker 1: transgender as babies, as babies, he's got these people on
Speaker 1: a young child who's now been a boy, who's now
Speaker 1: the parents have been dressing him up as a girl,
Speaker 1: maybe about five or six years old, and he's pushing
Speaker 1: that stuff years ago. And of course he also he
Speaker 1: also pushed the lockdown as well. Take a look at this.
Speaker 1: Jack was Soviet before he decided that the partisan loyalty
Speaker 1: was more important, had said. Doctor Oz was talking about
Speaker 1: the CCP's brutal lockdowns and Wuhan. He says, we have
Speaker 1: to copy what they did. We have to take their
Speaker 1: blueprint and repeat it here in this country, said doctor Oz.
Speaker 1: And that's what we did. You know, I got kicked
Speaker 1: off of YouTube permanently for saying that twenty twenty was
Speaker 1: the year the world became China, and that's what he
Speaker 1: was pushing that we need to copy what China has done. Now.
Speaker 1: Jack Pisoviet put that out in twenty twenty two when
Speaker 1: doctor Oz was in the primary to run as the
Speaker 1: Republican nominee, and yet Donald Trump supported doctor Oz. Isn't
Speaker 1: that interesting? And of course High Impact Flicks took that
Speaker 1: screenshot from Jack p Soviet and retweeted it. He said,
Speaker 1: America is facing a healthcare crisis and there may be
Speaker 1: no physician more qualified and capable than doctor Oz. He says,
Speaker 1: we have to repeat what China did in their country,
Speaker 1: and he gets he gets promoted, he gets endorsed by Trump,
Speaker 1: he gets promoted to CMS, and all the rest of
Speaker 1: this stuff. I get banned permanently from YouTube for saying that,
Speaker 1: and that's what did it? You know, that brought me
Speaker 1: to their attention, and then they put me on suspension
Speaker 1: and they go back and oh, we find two other
Speaker 1: things that we don't like, the three strikes and you're
Speaker 1: out that type of thing. And I can't even post
Speaker 1: Christmas music anymore. But doctor Oz is going to be
Speaker 1: deciding that at CMS that you know, drugs for kids,
Speaker 1: that's fine, you know, it's interesting. I saw this headline
Speaker 1: didn't make any sense at all to me, and they
Speaker 1: were saying testicular cancer went up and people who had
Speaker 1: orchid ectomies or something, which is a castration, right because
Speaker 1: of this transgender stuff. Now the hell the world do
Speaker 1: you get testicular cancer when they're no longer there. Well,
Speaker 1: the reality is that the headline was misleading. What they
Speaker 1: found was that these people who had been taking these
Speaker 1: these castrating drugs or you know what we used to
Speaker 1: give to rapists, we now give to children, now give
Speaker 1: to children. And what they found was that they've been
Speaker 1: taking these things for a while. When they go to
Speaker 1: do the operation, oh you've already got cancer, and oh
Speaker 1: it's spread. You got cancer from these drugs, from the drugs,
Speaker 1: not from the surgery. From the drugs. He supports that
Speaker 1: as well. I'm sure CMS will pay for that, But
Speaker 1: Breitbart tells you just the opposite. They don't mention any
Speaker 1: of that. Breitbart doesn't mention the microchipping that he was pushing.
Speaker 1: They didn't mention the lockdowns that he was pushing. They
Speaker 1: didn't mention the jabs that he was pushing. Vaccines in journal,
Speaker 1: but this vaccine in particular, No, this is what Breitbart
Speaker 1: says Oz has criticized the CDC's recommendations that young people
Speaker 1: get booster coronavirus vaccine shots. That's pretty damning, isn't it.
Speaker 1: I mean, did he oppose coronavirus shots for kids? No,
Speaker 1: he opposed the boosters for the kids. Oh, that's something
Speaker 1: we can write about, says Breitbart. That's something we can
Speaker 1: put a positive light in. He may have pushed the
Speaker 1: vaccine on everybody, he may have pushed the vaccine on kids,
Speaker 1: but he drew the line when it came to the
Speaker 1: booster shots for kids. Oh, there you go. Don't talk
Speaker 1: about his chipping of people. Don't talk about the transgender stuff.
Speaker 1: Don't talk about the lockdowns and the endless pushing of
Speaker 1: the vaccines. As a matter of fact, here is Harry.
Speaker 1: He is bullying Wendy Williams because she said you didn't
Speaker 1: want to get the Trump shot.
Speaker 5: Are you planning of getting your vaccine now?
Speaker 1: No? No, I don't trust it.
Speaker 4: I've never gotten the flu shot either though, and you
Speaker 4: and I have talked about that, and several of the
Speaker 4: doctors on my team talked to me about Wendy, we'll
Speaker 4: get the flu shot. And I've never had the flu.
Speaker 4: I'm not getting a flu shot. I very rarely get
Speaker 4: a cold, I never have headaches. I don't take an
Speaker 4: ass for in because I feel my heart murmur or
Speaker 4: something like that. I'm not getting No, I don't don't
Speaker 4: trust it. There I said it.
Speaker 5: Yeah, So let me go back to the i'c scenes
Speaker 5: for a second, because what you say and believe is
Speaker 5: so important to a lot of people. I mean millions
Speaker 5: and millions of America.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we got a sigh off to run here.
Speaker 5: Williams didn't get a vaccine, so I don't want to
Speaker 5: get a vaccine. So let me just ask you if
Speaker 5: there's anything that could happen that would make you feel comfortable.
Speaker 5: Ten million people get vaccinated without a problem. Your neighbor
Speaker 5: gets vaccinated as sibling, your son gets vaccinated, someone that's
Speaker 5: dear to you gets vaccinated does well, that might make
Speaker 5: you think, you know, just to get past the hassle
Speaker 5: of having the line on my back recovering from COVID
Speaker 5: nineteen or maybe not recovering, job worth the risk that
Speaker 5: I might actually consider this vaccine.
Speaker 1: I'm not getting the vaccine.
Speaker 4: Listen, ten million people and more have the flu vaccine,
Speaker 4: and how many people per year catch the flu. You know,
Speaker 4: I know, I'm not getting the vaccine doctor us, I'm not.
Speaker 1: I don't trust it.
Speaker 5: And is there something in particularly you don't trust about it?
Speaker 5: The fact that it was made quickly, the fact that
Speaker 5: we don't have enough follow up. What specifically is bothered you?
Speaker 1: Yeah, all of those it wasn't tested to skip the test.
Speaker 4: We smart people, but doctors don't know everything. And that's
Speaker 4: been proven as well. I'm not getting the vaccine, and
Speaker 4: I'm not saying that you shouldn't get the vaccine. Everybody watching,
Speaker 4: I'm just saying, I'm saying you shouldn't.
Speaker 1: I'm not getting I said it, then I'm saying it now. Okay,
Speaker 1: so this is okay. Now. Unfortunately, as Brad Zerbo tweeted out,
Speaker 1: he put a link. He says, unfortunately, she did eventually
Speaker 1: came in and got vaccinated. Probably had to do it
Speaker 1: to keep her job. And shocker, she got COVID and
Speaker 1: according to this article, she has unnamed ongoing medical issues. Now,
Speaker 1: and he links to an article from the Wrap, Wendy
Speaker 1: Williams extends her TV hiatus. It's due to an ongoing
Speaker 1: medical issues. Ongoing medical issues. It's that guy pushed it,
Speaker 1: kept pushing pushing it on her. But again Trump says,
Speaker 1: there may be no physician more qualified and capable than
Speaker 1: doctor Oz to make America healthy again, and you know,
Speaker 1: to move on to trans kids and get us chipped.
Speaker 1: There may be no doctor that is more effective at propaganda.
Speaker 1: So that tells you something about where Trump has headed,
Speaker 1: doesn't It's gonna be another si op, gonna be another SiO.
Speaker 1: He's been at the forefront of healthy living for decades,
Speaker 1: he says about doctor Oz as he's pushing the chips
Speaker 1: and pushing the trends stuff, and now let's go back
Speaker 1: to a doctor. Jeannette N. Shy Watt, a surgeon general.
Speaker 1: Life Site News is not lying like Breitbart and like
Speaker 1: WND and like info Wars and like on and on
Speaker 1: and on. They tell it like it is. They tell it.
Speaker 1: If there's something good about somebody, they'll mention it. If
Speaker 1: something bad about them, they'll mention it. They're not going
Speaker 1: to just suck up and take whatever Trump throws out
Speaker 1: there and try to put lipstick on these pigs. Life
Speaker 1: Site News says, well, she was nominated alongside Marty McCarey,
Speaker 1: who is going to be FDA Administrator. Notably, during her
Speaker 1: time at Fox News, she widely promoted vaccines, specifically against COVID.
Speaker 1: The side evidence of the vaccines were both unnecessary and dangerous.
Speaker 1: We all knew this. We knew every bit of this
Speaker 1: when it was happening. This is not something we just
Speaker 1: found out. We knew all of this before any of
Speaker 1: the doctors started talking about it. Right, I had to
Speaker 1: do was look at the various thing. All you had
Speaker 1: to do was look at previous years when they would
Speaker 1: sell the flu shot. Wendy Williams was onto something. It
Speaker 1: was exactly the same sig op they would use annually
Speaker 1: to push the flu shot during the COVID nineteen pandemic.
Speaker 1: Life Site News. So she worked on the front lines
Speaker 1: of New York City. I'm sorry, this is Trump saying
Speaker 1: that she worked on the front lines in New York
Speaker 1: City treating thousands of Americans. Well, that tells you right
Speaker 1: there that she's part of the fraud. Anybody who was
Speaker 1: in New York City that was supposed to be the epicenter,
Speaker 1: the worst place. And ye as we pointed out many times,
Speaker 1: we had a lot of independent journalists go around found
Speaker 1: that the hospitals were empty. They got run off by
Speaker 1: hospital administrators and so forth. We saw the twenty five
Speaker 1: hundred beds that were you know, military hospital that was
Speaker 1: set up in Central Park and then quietly taken down
Speaker 1: the middle of the night after nobody used it. We
Speaker 1: saw the hospital ship go to New York City as
Speaker 1: well as to La nobody used it. They quietly left.
Speaker 1: Franklin Graham same thing with his Samaritan ministries. I talked
Speaker 1: to pandemic nurse as the name of her book was,
Speaker 1: I forget what her actual name was. She wrote a
Speaker 1: book about it. She said, Hey, I was a nurse
Speaker 1: in Florida. I wanted to help people, and there was
Speaker 1: nothing happening in the Florida hospitals, but everybody kept saying
Speaker 1: it's really it's just horrible in New York. So she
Speaker 1: voluntarily went up to New York to help people up there.
Speaker 1: She said. She reported in and it was a couple
Speaker 1: of days before they called her to come in. She
Speaker 1: thought that was strange. And then she got there and
Speaker 1: she saw they weren't busy. But as she was being introduced,
Speaker 1: you know, shown the area by a doctor who was
Speaker 1: not busy. You know, they got time for all these
Speaker 1: these videos they put up on TikTok and everything. Well,
Speaker 1: the doctor wasn't busy, but he told her, he said,
Speaker 1: these patients on ventilators, he said, you know, eighty high,
Speaker 1: eighty percent, low, nineties percent of them were going to die.
Speaker 1: That was what Trump was paying for. She wrote a
Speaker 1: book about it. And so here's this woman that Trump
Speaker 1: has just moted, and a surgeon general, and he says
Speaker 1: she worked on the front lines in New York City.
Speaker 1: That means that she's a frontline fraudster, a frontline liar
Speaker 1: for Trump, for Trump and his pandemic. She helped patience
Speaker 1: and the aftermath of Trump's historic operation Warp Speed that
Speaker 1: saved hundreds of millions of lives, wrote Trump in a
Speaker 1: press release. Yeah, how many people did she kill who
Speaker 1: have ventilators with medazlam and other drugs to suppress your
Speaker 1: breathing when you've got respiratory issues? And here she is
Speaker 1: on Fox News pushing vaccines. Remember Breitbart told us that
Speaker 1: Trump has filled his cabinet with anti vax skeptics and
Speaker 1: anti lockdown people.
Speaker 3: First of all, vaccines saved lives. And I am so excited,
Speaker 3: and I think and I commend Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg
Speaker 3: for taking action because this affects everyone. This affects our
Speaker 3: children and affects adults. We just look at the recent
Speaker 3: measles outbreak, the biggest outbreak that we've had in decades
Speaker 3: with measles, and that's no joke. Measles can cause brain
Speaker 3: inflammation and pneumonia and ear infections and hearing loss and death.
Speaker 3: So it's about time that breaking action. And I hope
Speaker 3: to pray that other social media platforms will follow suit
Speaker 3: and do the same thing.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I have to get the shot.
Speaker 6: The vaccinations is so important.
Speaker 1: This is really going around. Yeah, she's a perfect one
Speaker 1: for him, isn't she. Yeah, they keep telling the same
Speaker 1: lies everywhere, These guys keep telling the same lies. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, and again I showed this to you before
Speaker 1: you know. She's on vaccine hesitancy is a global threat.
Speaker 1: She said, protect yourself, educate yourself, and vaccinate. She tweeted out,
Speaker 1: mm hmmm, yeah, well protect yourself and educate yourself. What
Speaker 1: did you think you're gonna get when you voted for Trump? Maga,
Speaker 1: you thought you were gonna get vaccine skeptics. So you
Speaker 1: thought you going to get cheerleaders for his depopulation program.
Speaker 1: That's exactly what. You got a bunch of cheerleaders for them.
Speaker 1: Trump tapped And this is now, this is zero hedge doing.
Speaker 1: It's Trump sucking right here, they say Trump taps COVID
Speaker 1: contrarian staunch public health critic mccarrey for FDA. Really is
Speaker 1: that how big pharmacies there? No, but they even unlike Breiitbart, okay,
Speaker 1: even though they're sucking up to Trump, sucking up to that.
Speaker 1: Oh he did a great job. They do talk about
Speaker 1: some of the negatives in it, said, while not broadly
Speaker 1: opposing COVID vaccines, that's right, he didn't oppose them. McCarry
Speaker 1: condemned the Biden administration for pushing boosters on young patients.
Speaker 1: Oh there we go. Yeah, get the vaccine. You should
Speaker 1: get it. It's going to save your life. Don't be
Speaker 1: hesitant take it. Even the kids. Oh well, I don't know.
Speaker 1: As people are dropping like flies after a couple of
Speaker 1: years of this nonsense, and they keep trying to push
Speaker 1: boosters on kids. He finally says something, finally, Oh we'll
Speaker 1: hang on to that. We'll hang on to that. So
Speaker 1: he says the problem with these vax mandates as all
Speaker 1: of them said, all of these Trump supposedly anti vaxers.
Speaker 1: Their problem is is that they don't want vaccine hesitancy.
Speaker 1: That's a threat to them. And he says that as well.
Speaker 1: He said the vaccine mandates quote create never vaxers, and
Speaker 1: he wants to always vACC you always. The new head
Speaker 1: of the FDA, now remember Trump's previous two heads. We
Speaker 1: had Scott Gottlieb and Han. They've now gone to Pfizer
Speaker 1: and Moderna. Some feel but McCarry was too slow, says
Speaker 1: zero Hedge, to question some elements of the COVID regime. Well,
Speaker 1: they're not going to say that. Some people have said,
Speaker 1: we're not going to criticize Trump, says zero Hedge, We're
Speaker 1: not going to state the facts. Well show this is
Speaker 1: some other people are saying this. I'm not saying this,
Speaker 1: President Trump. Don't get mad at me, MAGA cult please.
Speaker 1: Some feel that macary was too slow to question some
Speaker 1: elements of the COVID regime. It was initially too credulous
Speaker 1: about the benefits of vaccination. In June twenty twenty, he
Speaker 1: touted the liberating qualities of universal masking. Liberating. He called
Speaker 1: it liberating. Universal masking is liberating. But putting a handkerchief
Speaker 1: on your face and breathing and all that stuff all day,
Speaker 1: that's liberating. He said, that's Orwellian, that's double think, if
Speaker 1: ever there was double speak, And then that was in
Speaker 1: June of twenty twenty it was liberating to wear a mask.
Speaker 1: In March of twenty twenty one, he tweeted out the
Speaker 1: data shows that vaccines confer near perfect protection against death
Speaker 1: and hospitalization from COVID. So he's a Johns Hopkins lying
Speaker 1: shill for the vaccine companies. And don't tell me that
Speaker 1: this guy doesn't know better. He's a doctor. Come on,
Speaker 1: you know. And this is who Trump's new FDA head
Speaker 1: is this pharmacial from Johns Hopkins. And I thought that
Speaker 1: Breitbart said that he was against masking. Yeah, they did,
Speaker 1: except they must have missed that quote. At least their
Speaker 1: hedge got that. But still big cheerleaders. Kennedy RFK Jr.
Speaker 1: Is a big cheerleader of this guy. Marty McCarey who said,
Speaker 1: masks we're liberating, liberating for the people who can tell
Speaker 1: you to wear them. Right, Yes, I've been liberated from reason,
Speaker 1: from science, and from the law. I can tell people
Speaker 1: do whatever they want. Simon says, do this and like
Speaker 1: at these people got to do it. Look at that,
Speaker 1: Look at that they're doing it. Actually, Kennedy said, the
Speaker 1: FDA is in need of a major trimming. He said,
Speaker 1: there are entire departments, like the nutrition department at the
Speaker 1: FDA that have to go. They're not doing their job. Seriously.
Speaker 1: You've got these people you're pushing, people who push the masks,
Speaker 1: who push the bio weapon stuff and all. And now
Speaker 1: you're worried about sugar in our food. That's your high priority.
Speaker 1: It's all we're going to get from the from HHS
Speaker 1: and this big pharma Johns Hopkins liar and fraud. The
Speaker 1: Washington Post reports that Kennedy was influential and McCarey's selection
Speaker 1: as Kennedy urged Trump to favor candidates not tightly linked
Speaker 1: to either the healthcare industry or to government. He worked
Speaker 1: at Johns Hopkins. I mean, these people have been involved
Speaker 1: in all these germ games in RFK Junior knows that
Speaker 1: he knows about these germ games going back to every
Speaker 1: year they would do it, and it was always Johns
Speaker 1: Hopkins and Fauci and the CIA running these things every year. Well,
Speaker 1: here's what the pharmaceutical industry says. STAT News is the
Speaker 1: trade publication for the pharmaceutical industry. Listen to their headline,
Speaker 1: we dodged a bullet With Marty McCarey as FDA commissioner,
Speaker 1: many appear cautiously optimistic. Many what many big pharma people.
Speaker 1: They're excited about this guy. Breitbart wants you to believe
Speaker 1: that he's going to go and zero Hedge wants you
Speaker 1: to believe that he's going to go to war with
Speaker 1: big pharmaceutical companies. Pharmaceutical companies no better. STAT reporters reached
Speaker 1: out to key figures and biotech and pharma and and
Speaker 1: medical devices to find out what they think about JOHNS. Hopkins,
Speaker 1: pancreatic surgeon Marty McCarey, and they said, we dodged a bullet,
Speaker 1: We dodged a bullet. Well, I think the bullet hit us,
Speaker 1: didn't hit Trump. I don't believe that ear story either.
Speaker 1: High Boost says, we got a TV doctor. This is
Speaker 1: all fake. We got a WWE owner, it's all fake.
Speaker 1: Don't worry America, she's hot, he says. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I didn't think she was. Maybe that's an old picture
Speaker 1: you saw it, Andy says, I watched them the er
Speaker 1: nurses PCR test a dead thirty eight year old male
Speaker 1: who took the JAB eight weeks prior to dying for
Speaker 1: no reason whatsoever, PCR test him. Well, I guess they
Speaker 1: can get twenty percent bonus on whatever they did. I
Speaker 1: can't even talk facts with anyone that is MAGA friendly.
Speaker 1: It's like playing chess with a pigeon that they not
Speaker 1: over all the pieces and crap on the board and
Speaker 1: strut around like they want. That's exactly it. That's great.
Speaker 1: I love that, Hindy. Yeah, they uh, over all the pieces,
Speaker 1: crap on the board and start around like they want.
Speaker 1: U s a Miller one two three. Doctor Oz said
Speaker 1: he would never give his own children the vaccine. Why
Speaker 1: would he think we would ever want to take it? Yeah,
Speaker 1: well he's I don't know, maybe he just doesn't like
Speaker 1: Americans and his children are Turkish. Right. So President like
Speaker 1: Trump unveils a quantum leap plan to revolutionize American living,
Speaker 1: and we're going to talk about what that new plan,
Speaker 1: a new way to live is. Uh when we return,
Speaker 1: we'll be right back.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 1: And you have all been uh waiting with baited breath
Speaker 1: to hear what President elect Trump's quantum Leap plan is
Speaker 1: to revolutionize American living. And this is brought to you
Speaker 1: by yet another media outlet. That is another con servitude
Speaker 1: media outlet for Trump. They serve him and they con
Speaker 1: you conservatives servitudes, I should say. Trump said in his
Speaker 1: incoming administration, he will work to revolutionize America's standard of
Speaker 1: living by building new cities, investing in transportation, lowering the
Speaker 1: cost of living for everyone, and modernizing public spaces across
Speaker 1: the country. Yes, the Quantum Leap Plan is his freedom
Speaker 1: cities and he's not giving up on that, folks. This
Speaker 1: guy is a world economic form democrat. He's a pal
Speaker 1: of the Clintons and Jeffrey Epstein, and he is a
Speaker 1: pal of big Pharma, and he's the father of the JAB.
Speaker 1: What do we expect from this guy? He wants to
Speaker 1: ten again. Here's his plan again. He's still talking about
Speaker 1: this plan. You know. Some of these things are put
Speaker 1: out there by his staff and you never hear from
Speaker 1: them again. When he ran in twenty sixteen, he had
Speaker 1: a great plan. Of the issues then were the border
Speaker 1: and Obamacare and things like that. Somebody is staff put
Speaker 1: together a plan that was going to allow people to
Speaker 1: have information about their healthcare. You know, how what is
Speaker 1: the record of this hospital, of this doctor or whatever. Yeah,
Speaker 1: give you some transparency so you could make a decision.
Speaker 1: They would allow you to keep more of your money
Speaker 1: with tax breaks and savings accounts and things like that,
Speaker 1: so that you would have the money to make that
Speaker 1: informed decision. They would allow competition across state lines. You know,
Speaker 1: that's one of the reasons all we got blue cross,
Speaker 1: blue shield of this state and blue shield of that
Speaker 1: state because they have to they can't go across state
Speaker 1: lines for some reason. Doesn't mean that they don't collude,
Speaker 1: of course they do. They're all doing exactly the same thing.
Speaker 1: It's like standard oil of Ohio versus standard oil of
Speaker 1: Illinois or whatever. You know, Oh, we broke up the monopoly,
Speaker 1: did you really? But anyway, it was all these different
Speaker 1: things and they were good. You know, it was a
Speaker 1: good plan. Trump never mentioned it in his twenty sixteen campaign,
Speaker 1: and upon election when I went back to reference it
Speaker 1: to talk about it, it's like, well, I hope he's
Speaker 1: going to do this, or that they had purged the page,
Speaker 1: the deep sixed it and so, but it's freedom cities.
Speaker 1: This is something he's talked about. It's something he really
Speaker 1: wants to do, and he's talking about it again. Ten
Speaker 1: cities to be built on undeveloped federal land. Well, again,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of federal land that the federal government
Speaker 1: doesn't have a constitutional authority to own. I have constitutional
Speaker 1: authority to own ports and forts, but not the vast
Speaker 1: majority of the Western states. And so President Trump proposes
Speaker 1: a national contest, a national contest to charter up to
Speaker 1: ten new cities on a very small portion of federal
Speaker 1: land and award these charters to the best ideas and
Speaker 1: proposals for development. And of course it is going to
Speaker 1: be on a very very small portion of federal land,
Speaker 1: because that's Agenda twenty one, which goes back to before
Speaker 1: the twenty first century. Those are you and agenda to
Speaker 1: concentrate everybody in a few of these mega cities. They
Speaker 1: later called them smart cities. Now Trump is calling them
Speaker 1: freedom cities. But it's to concentrate the population in cities
Speaker 1: where we're easily surveiled and controlled. And of course five
Speaker 1: G and all the rest of stuff that he was
Speaker 1: pushing without any regard for health issues is a big
Speaker 1: part of that surveillance and control, and the vast majority
Speaker 1: of America was going to be off limits to everybody.
Speaker 1: So yeah, well, we won't use too much funeral land
Speaker 1: to put in ten cities. We'll just pack people in.
Speaker 1: And you know that's the old UN plan. He is
Speaker 1: a un democrat, globalist, and he's a pervert as well.
Speaker 1: So he proposes a national contest. May the best billionaire win?
Speaker 1: Who will be the lucky billionaire? Who will win this?
Speaker 1: Maybe he can do it as some kind of an
Speaker 1: apprentice thing, right, maybe we can have reality TV about
Speaker 1: who gets to design the world that we're all going
Speaker 1: to be forced to live in or these smart cities.
Speaker 1: I tell you, this guy is such a backstabbing trader
Speaker 1: and he hasn't even become president yet. You can see
Speaker 1: the outlines of what he's going to do here. So
Speaker 1: we're going to award these charters and gonna have charters.
Speaker 1: What does that mean? Well, I'm not sure. I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, when we had when you had James Town
Speaker 1: set up, it was a charter right from the British government.
Speaker 1: So we're going to give you charter, We're going to
Speaker 1: give you title to this area, and so I guess
Speaker 1: you know, people like Elon Musk will be given ownership
Speaker 1: of this The federal government retains this land unconstitutionally, and
Speaker 1: rather than turn it over to the states to be
Speaker 1: allocated to people, they're going to turn it over to
Speaker 1: some billionaires so they can make money off of it.
Speaker 1: With their charter. Trump additionally proposed launching the biggest revolution
Speaker 1: in American transportation since the Interstate Highway system by advancing
Speaker 1: air mobility via vertical takeoff and landing vehicles. Well, and
Speaker 1: of course we've already talked about how they're are going
Speaker 1: to grease the skids for self driving for Elon Musk.
Speaker 1: Who knows, maybe Elon Musk will take to the skies
Speaker 1: as well instead of the boring approach where you go underground.
Speaker 1: He certainly understands and everybody should understand what we've talked
Speaker 1: about for the longest time that if you've got cities
Speaker 1: that are going to get more and more dense and
Speaker 1: that are going to grow up with high rise buildings,
Speaker 1: well you're going to have to grow the infrastructure up
Speaker 1: as well, because you can't start getting wider and wider
Speaker 1: with roads. They're going to have to be multi layer.
Speaker 1: That's why he started doing the boring thing. But of
Speaker 1: course you could do with the flying cars as well.
Speaker 1: So here we go. I guess they should call it
Speaker 1: the Jetson option that we've got here. Everybody's always saying,
Speaker 1: where's my flying car? You know, well, I'm afraid you're
Speaker 1: not going to like it when it comes because you
Speaker 1: won't own it, you won't drive it. It'll be owned
Speaker 1: by Musk and Bezos and black Rock and that type
Speaker 1: of thing. So he says he's going to challenge the
Speaker 1: governors of all fifty states to take part in a
Speaker 1: modernization and beautification campaign by getting rid of ugly buildings.
Speaker 1: And again, how is this different from I like to see?
Speaker 1: Is this going to be any different than Booty Gay
Speaker 1: going in and saying, well, you know, these interstate systems
Speaker 1: are racist. We got to knock them down. They just
Speaker 1: want to destroy stuff. Maybe he wants everybody to build
Speaker 1: back with gold, you know, because he likes to put
Speaker 1: gold on everything he's got, right, So maybe we get
Speaker 1: some fake gold and put it on all the buildings
Speaker 1: because we weren't going to have the money for it
Speaker 1: real stuff. Past generations of Americans, he said, pursued big
Speaker 1: dreams and daring projects that once seemed absolutely impossible. They
Speaker 1: pushed across an unsettled continent, and they built new cities
Speaker 1: in the wild frontier. But today our country has lost
Speaker 1: its boldness? Is it because we look to the federal
Speaker 1: government and people like Donald Trump to do it for us?
Speaker 1: Is that why we've lost them? Have we become pacified
Speaker 1: with welfare and things like universal basic income? That his
Speaker 1: stimulus checks of the things like that were designed to
Speaker 1: move the Overton window towards universal welfare. That's what it is,
Speaker 1: universal basic income as universal welfare, to pacify us, to
Speaker 1: destroy our families, to destroy our independence. I mean, take
Speaker 1: a look at what they did to the black communities
Speaker 1: with a welfare program. You had Burgess, Congressman talking about
Speaker 1: when he was the NFL player. I think that's his name,
Speaker 1: and I'm thinking Anthony Burgess, that's the guy who wrote
Speaker 1: Clockwork Orange. It's a big difference. Yeah, this is a
Speaker 1: NFL player who's now a congressman from Utah. Anyway, what
Speaker 1: he said was true. He said, when I was a kid,
Speaker 1: we had vibrant black communities, we had intact families, said,
Speaker 1: and the welfare state destroyed that. And that's what universal
Speaker 1: basic income and the lockdowns and the stimulus checks and
Speaker 1: Trump designing your city along the lines of what the
Speaker 1: World Economic Forum and the UN have been saying they
Speaker 1: want all along. Just give it a different name. You know.
Speaker 1: Trump is the big pacifiers. They can do everything that
Speaker 1: they want to do. As long as it's Trump doing it.
Speaker 1: The conservatives won't push back, and neither will the con
Speaker 1: servitude press. So we built new cities in the wildfrontier,
Speaker 1: that's right. We did it without government money, and we
Speaker 1: did it without government control. And so why have we
Speaker 1: lost our boldness because we have become pacified again. Everybody
Speaker 1: used to say, well, don't make a federal issue out
Speaker 1: of it, or there ought to be a law against that.
Speaker 1: When I was growing up, that's what people would tell, Well,
Speaker 1: that make I'll make a big deal of it. No,
Speaker 1: don't make a federal case out of it, you know,
Speaker 1: And now you hear that all the time. A new
Speaker 1: system of universal baseline tariffs. Also, he wants to reward
Speaker 1: domestic production while taxing foreign companies. Let me tell you
Speaker 1: how this is going to look like. He's not going
Speaker 1: to reduce the income tax except for the big corporations.
Speaker 1: That's what he did his first time in office. He's
Speaker 1: not going to stop the army of eighty thousand IRS
Speaker 1: agents and the artificial intelligence for which we're going to
Speaker 1: be billed eighty billion dollars for these people who are
Speaker 1: going to attack us. He's not going to pull any
Speaker 1: of that stuff out. We're just going to have higher
Speaker 1: taxes than everything that we buy. And then he wants
Speaker 1: to pay people to have babies. He wants to have
Speaker 1: what he calls a baby bonus to spark a new
Speaker 1: baby boom. Well, here's the thing. If they've got to
Speaker 1: pay you to have kids, maybe you shouldn't be having kids, right,
Speaker 1: should have kids because you want to have kids. And
Speaker 1: what I've noticed is that the best parents are not
Speaker 1: the ones who are so focused on money, but they're
Speaker 1: focused on their kids, and they will sacrifice their money,
Speaker 1: they'll sacrifice a second income because they want to spend
Speaker 1: time with their kids. Then that brings us to another
Speaker 1: one of his nominees, Scott Bessant for Treasury Secretary. Now
Speaker 1: here's Breitbart again. They see nothing at all wrong with
Speaker 1: this guy, nothing at all. And of course, the big elephants.
Speaker 1: He's got two big elephants in the room. One of
Speaker 1: them is that he worked with sorrows, and then the
Speaker 1: other one is is that he is he's not. I
Speaker 1: guess I don't know a lot to see what he does.
Speaker 1: So far, he's not pushed it as identity politics. Says
Speaker 1: he hasn't been running for anything. He doesn't push it
Speaker 1: as identity politics like Booty Gay has. Nevertheless, he's made
Speaker 1: a lot of comments about the fact that he is.
Speaker 1: He has a male partner and they've adopted a child.
Speaker 3: And.
Speaker 1: He's not dressing up like Sam Brinton stealing women's luggage
Speaker 1: and clothes. He's not a cartoon character like this Levine guy.
Speaker 1: I call him Dick Divine Richard Levine. Okay, he's not
Speaker 1: a cartoon character like that. And but he may be
Speaker 1: along the lines of Rick Garnell, who still did push
Speaker 1: this as identity politics. Rick Garnell, who was I think
Speaker 1: he's DNI or something for acting DNI for a short
Speaker 1: period of time. But then he made it all about
Speaker 1: his homosexuality and pushed that, and of course Milania and
Speaker 1: Trump are all about that as well. So become a
Speaker 1: big pusher of the LGBT aspect. But you know, breit
Speaker 1: Bart doesn't say anything about that. Bright Bart doesn't say
Speaker 1: anything about his Soros connection. Instead, what bright Bart does
Speaker 1: it just republishes and you know several paragraphs the press
Speaker 1: release from Trump about Scott Bessant, Washington Post says Trump
Speaker 1: picks Scott Bessant, financier who embraced MAGA, for Treasury and
Speaker 1: as they point out, Trump said of him, I have
Speaker 1: one of the most brilliant men in Wall Street. I
Speaker 1: think here he is central casting. He is central casting. Yeah,
Speaker 1: got a very well groomed movie star. Looks at me.
Speaker 1: He doesn't look like Dick Levine or Divine at all. Right,
Speaker 1: straight out of Central Casting and straight out of Wall Street.
Speaker 1: Oh that's great. That's what we need for Treasury Secretary.
Speaker 1: We need somebody who's going to serve the needs of
Speaker 1: Wall Street because, you know, Main Street, as Trump told
Speaker 1: us in his first first stint, is not essential. Wall Street,
Speaker 1: hope is essential. That's how both he and Biden measure
Speaker 1: the success of their policies. Is it good for Wall Street?
Speaker 1: We don't care about you. Is it good for Wall Street?
Speaker 1: After Trump's speech at the Economic Club of New York
Speaker 1: in September, Bessant flattered him effusively praising Trump. He said
Speaker 1: this was a master class. And then he called Vice
Speaker 1: President la Law an economic illiterate. Well, he got that right.
Speaker 1: He's illiterate in every category, but a master class from Trump. No. No,
Speaker 1: Once a chief lieutenant for the GOP boogeyman George Soros,
Speaker 1: but hey, Maga can overlook that, we don't care. We've
Speaker 1: hated on George Soros in for wars, hated on Soros,
Speaker 1: and rightfully so. But now that Trump has appointed his
Speaker 1: right hand man and the guy who helped him to
Speaker 1: bust the British Central Bank and create a currency crisis. There,
Speaker 1: that guy's good now because Trump picked him. Because he
Speaker 1: flattered Trump, he gets picked, and now the Maga press
Speaker 1: is going to flatter Trump as well. Once a chief
Speaker 1: lieutenant for GP boogeyman George Soros, Bessant emerged over the
Speaker 1: past year as a trusted Trump advisor who commanded respect
Speaker 1: among the billionaires. Another financial elite who's backing the president
Speaker 1: elect Covets. Bessant attended Yale before joining Sous's fund management
Speaker 1: in nineteen ninety one, at the age of twenty nine,
Speaker 1: he joined the team that famously made a fortune through
Speaker 1: shorting the British pound in nineteen ninety two, contributing to
Speaker 1: the collapse of the currency. Maybe this is the guy
Speaker 1: who can complete the collapse of the dollar and reset
Speaker 1: the financial system before we go over to some stable
Speaker 1: coin or something like the rest of the people in
Speaker 1: the Trump administration of pushing by the way, he wasn't
Speaker 1: just a part of the team from what other people said,
Speaker 1: he masterminded it. So he may be a very smart guy.
Speaker 1: Here's the deal, here's the deal. No, seriously, Biden would say.
Speaker 1: The problem is is that if you are really smart
Speaker 1: and you don't have any restraints on what you do morally, ethically, legally,
Speaker 1: you don't think you're going to answer to God or
Speaker 1: law enforcement. That makes you really dangerous. In my book,
Speaker 1: that's why, you know, it's like, well, you know, there
Speaker 1: was that about La La you know, but of course
Speaker 1: she wasn't going to be running anything. It would be
Speaker 1: smarter people behind her that would be running things, So
Speaker 1: that would not have been a win. But anyway. Bessett
Speaker 1: also has social ties to other elites. He's friends with
Speaker 1: King Charles and Queen Camilla of Britain. He is a
Speaker 1: member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He is friends
Speaker 1: with Princess fur y'all of Jordan. Well, forget that, that
Speaker 1: doesn't matter. But the Council on Form Relations and Sorrows.
Speaker 1: Isn't that a big deal to Maga? No No, I
Speaker 1: tell you you know, Alex's hair would be on fire
Speaker 1: if it was Obama putting somebody in that had been
Speaker 1: a pal of Soros and was connected to the Council
Speaker 1: on Form Relations. And all these other organizations did special broadcasts.
Speaker 1: This is it's the end of the world. But they
Speaker 1: say nothing about this guy's background. I am so disgusted
Speaker 1: with a dishonest press coverage that we see out there.
Speaker 1: The people are nothing but Trump sycophants. And this is
Speaker 1: what happens when issues don't matter to you, when all
Speaker 1: that matters to you is a politician or a party.
Speaker 1: In a twenty fifteen interview with Yale Daily News, Bessent,
Speaker 1: who graduated in nineteen eighty four, sid, if you told
Speaker 1: me in nineteen eighty four, when we graduated and people
Speaker 1: were dying of AIDS, that thirty years later I'd be
Speaker 1: legally married and we'd have two children, two children via surrogacy,
Speaker 1: I wouldn't have believed you, and you know, just like
Speaker 1: Rick Garnell, he may yet make his LGBT stuff a
Speaker 1: centerpiece because he's outspoken on this. By the way, I really.
Speaker 3: This is.
Speaker 1: High Impact Films put this out and said, oh yeah,
Speaker 1: if Trump announces that he is transitioning the MAGA people,
Speaker 1: just tol us at its forty chests. He's just trying
Speaker 1: to get on the inside with these people. Yeah. He
Speaker 1: also tapped Brooke Rawlins of America First Policy Institute for
Speaker 1: Agriculture Secretary. I said, from the very beginning it was
Speaker 1: not going to be Massy. Trump is going to hire
Speaker 1: people who are flattering him, and Massy waited too late
Speaker 1: to start to flatter Trump. He opposed him on principle.
Speaker 1: When Trump wanted to do three and a half trillion dollars,
Speaker 1: he forced all of Congress to come back and go
Speaker 1: on record voting for it, and so Thomas Massey I
Speaker 1: think would have done something to help independent farmers like
Speaker 1: Amos Miller who were in the crosshairs of the USDA
Speaker 1: Farm and daries who wanted to do raw milk and
Speaker 1: things like that. I don't think she will. Brooke Rawlins
Speaker 1: is there with the America First Policy Institute. Well, that
Speaker 1: sounds familiar. That sounds like something that is a Trump
Speaker 1: maga thing, and it is. She served as an assistant
Speaker 1: to Trump and his first administration, and she was an
Speaker 1: assistant on technology initiatives. Doesn't sound like you're going to
Speaker 1: go back to raw milk and amish farming with that,
Speaker 1: does it. After leaving the White House, she was among
Speaker 1: a group of senior advisors to create the new nonprofit
Speaker 1: group aimed at promoting Trump policies. So she has been
Speaker 1: a Trump sucker all along. She again creates this America
Speaker 1: First Institute. It's a policy group to promote his policies,
Speaker 1: you know, like freedom cities and stuff like that.
Speaker 2: I guess.
Speaker 1: And if she is somebody who was there with tech initiatives,
Speaker 1: is she going to be pushing at the Department of Agriculture?
Speaker 1: Is she going to be pushing this genetically modified food? Oh,
Speaker 1: it's great, it's technology, yeah, and all the rest of
Speaker 1: this stuff. The Department could be at the front lines
Speaker 1: of Trump's efforts to trim what he calls a deep
Speaker 1: state of federal bureaucracy and its efforts in his efforts
Speaker 1: to implement tariffs on foreign goods. Well, I mean, there'll
Speaker 1: be a lot less exports of agricultural product if he
Speaker 1: does that. But I don't think she's going to be
Speaker 1: focused on food freedom issues. I hope I'm wrong. USDA
Speaker 1: is the only agency with a Rural Development branch that
Speaker 1: distribute federal broadband, housing and utilities programs to rural communities. Well,
Speaker 1: and of course, if you want to get broadband out
Speaker 1: into rural communities, you're going to have elon Musk starlink, right,
Speaker 1: that's the natural thing there, and so we need to
Speaker 1: have somebody there and the Department of Agriculture that's going
Speaker 1: to make that happen. She may not help us when
Speaker 1: it comes to these other issues being able to grow
Speaker 1: your own food and slaughter it on your own land,
Speaker 1: but you know, when it comes to putting starlink out there,
Speaker 1: she could jump on board, not and help Musk. She
Speaker 1: also served as an assistant to him during for the
Speaker 1: technology issues, as I said before. And then you've got
Speaker 1: Pam Bondi who is going to be who's replaced Matt
Speaker 1: Gates for Attorney General nominee. On MSNBC, they interviewed a
Speaker 1: Palm Beach County, Florida State attorney Dave Ehrenberg, who's a Democrat.
Speaker 1: He worked for her when she was Attorney General of Florida.
Speaker 1: He said that she will quote pursue strong policies against fentanyl.
Speaker 1: She's going to be a big time drug warrior. That's great,
Speaker 1: that's what we need, need to ramp up the drug
Speaker 1: wars been so effective for the last was it fifty
Speaker 1: three years or something. She'll go after anti semitism on campus,
Speaker 1: So I'll applaud her for that. So in other words,
Speaker 1: she's going to she's going to pursue the unconstitutional war
Speaker 1: on drugs to new heights, and then she's going to
Speaker 1: try to eviscerate the First Amendment because that's what we're
Speaker 1: talking about. We talk about anti semitism on campus. We're
Speaker 1: going to have to fight that. That means that you're
Speaker 1: going to shut down free speech on campus. That's code
Speaker 1: word for censorship. I don't believe she's going to be
Speaker 1: Matt Gates two point zero. She's not going to burn
Speaker 1: it all down. She is not going to put forward
Speaker 1: fake charges to go after Trump's enemies. Yeah, you'll see
Speaker 1: some John Durham investigations and they won't really mattered anything, right,
Speaker 1: Matt Gates was just out there as a head fake
Speaker 1: to Trump for Trump. Either that or the guy is
Speaker 1: so unbelievably incompetent and full of hubris that he didn't
Speaker 1: bother to vet him or to think about how he's
Speaker 1: going to put it through.
Speaker 2: Again.
Speaker 1: I looked at it, it's like, okay, well, you know,
Speaker 1: maybe he's going to use these this vacancy appointment law
Speaker 1: that he's already used in the past, even if he
Speaker 1: can't with since he lost the and he was calling
Speaker 1: people directly, by the way, in the Senate to try
Speaker 1: to get Rick Scott as the Senate majority leader. He
Speaker 1: was personally lobbying all these people, and he couldn't get
Speaker 1: it done, and so that made it look like it's
Speaker 1: going to be bad for his recess appointments. And then
Speaker 1: but then he had this Vacancy Act and yet couldn't
Speaker 1: get it through with that either. And then this sounds
Speaker 1: kind of familiar, doesn't It kind of sounds like his
Speaker 1: appointment at the FDA and Big Pharmacy article said, well,
Speaker 1: we dodged a bullet with that. That's about as good
Speaker 1: as we could get. And this guy who's a Democrat says, well,
Speaker 1: Bondy is as good as Democrats are going to get
Speaker 1: there you go. I guess the Democrats dodged a bullet,
Speaker 1: just like Big Pharma dodged a bullet. When Trump made
Speaker 1: his appointments, Lindsey Graham says she'll be confirmed quickly because
Speaker 1: she desires to be confirmed quickly. There you go, okay,
Speaker 1: and then you've got af Post, says Trump's incoming ag PM.
Speaker 1: Bondie says American students who protest Israel should be quote
Speaker 1: taken out unquote of the country or subjected to FBI interviews. Wow. Wow,
Speaker 1: there you go. No free speech here right. Trump's new
Speaker 1: pick for Attorney General was a registered foreign lobbyist on
Speaker 1: behalf of Cutter, says Michael Tracy. She received one hundred
Speaker 1: and fifteen thousand dollars a month a month then twice
Speaker 1: what the median family income is here in America. She
Speaker 1: got that per month for her undoubtedly exceptional lobbying services
Speaker 1: two point six million dollars a year just by one government.
Speaker 1: He also says, something tells me that corporate lobbyist Pam
Speaker 1: Bondi will not be considered as controversial as the previous
Speaker 1: Attorney general nominee. She joins chief of staff Susie Wiles,
Speaker 1: a fellow corporate lobbyist, and Transportation Secretary nominee Sean Duffy,
Speaker 1: a fellow corporate lobbyists. What was that that Trump said?
Speaker 1: He said, we got to stop this revolving door between
Speaker 1: corporate lobbyists and anything. We got to make sure that
Speaker 1: people don't go to work for the agencies that they
Speaker 1: were monitoring. You mean, like your FDA heads Scott Gottlieb
Speaker 1: and Stephen Hahn, who went to work for Pfiser Moderna.
Speaker 1: Pam Bondi says she went. Michael Tracy says also says.
Speaker 1: She says she went multiple times to Israel as a
Speaker 1: Florida Attorney General, including one trip which she was taken
Speaker 1: to the gol On Heights and claims that she looked
Speaker 1: over the border into Syria and it's on I's flag,
Speaker 1: you know, kind of like I can see Russia from here.
Speaker 1: What was her name? The vice presidential nominee for John McCain.
Speaker 1: They come and go. It was Tim Something, wasn't it, Sarah? Palin? Michael.
Speaker 1: Eventually it comes back still, but it just takes a
Speaker 1: long time. It's like Pim Bondi campaigned for Jeb Bush
Speaker 1: says Michael Tracy, yet another cabinet pick with a Jeb
Speaker 1: Bush seal of approval. So is Trump a Jeb Bush
Speaker 1: Republican or is he a Hillary Clinton Democrat. I just
Speaker 1: can't decide. Having an Attorney general that will fight for
Speaker 1: the protection of the Jewish community, we couldn't do better
Speaker 1: than Pam Bondy says Okay, So there you go. Democrats
Speaker 1: love the pick of Pim Bondi, and the Jewish community
Speaker 1: loves the pick. And you've got pharmaceutical companies love the
Speaker 1: pick of FDA director that.
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 1: You know, the MAGA people are quiet because you know,
Speaker 1: anything that Trump does, it's got to be the right thing. Well,
Speaker 1: we're going to take a break and we're going to
Speaker 1: talk about First Amendment issues and about campus anti semitism
Speaker 1: and the rest of this stuff. But I don't want to
Speaker 1: get some of your comments here, Naburu nine. Trump will
Speaker 1: rubber stamp every injection the medical industrial complex pushes out.
Speaker 1: He absolutely will, and he'll take credit for it. Stop
Speaker 1: the testing. Look, I got it out faster than anybody else.
Speaker 1: AUDI Modern Rector of Radio America's trillions in debt, but
Speaker 1: they have the money to build these tech towns. Oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: no problem. You know, we just have a contest. And
Speaker 1: it seems like we had contests from DARPA for self
Speaker 1: driving cars to weaponize them, contests for robots to weaponize them.
Speaker 1: Now we're going to have contests for the cities to
Speaker 1: weaponize the cities too, honor seeker. Let's get rid of
Speaker 1: the illegals, and we will not need extra cities yet
Speaker 1: if we build the cities, I suppose that we will
Speaker 1: need the illegals. Can we have Toto too? Yeah? It's uh,
Speaker 1: And how do you get rid of the illegals? I
Speaker 1: think Eric Peters and I are on the same page.
Speaker 1: I've said for the longest time, stop the welfare magnet.
Speaker 1: Stop pulling people in by offering them this fabulous welfare
Speaker 1: benefits superior in many cases to what Americans get, whether
Speaker 1: you're talking about college tuition, things like in state college
Speaker 1: tuition and many other things. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: it's just terrific to see the fact that now it's
Speaker 1: getting cold, and we look at the people in western
Speaker 1: North Carolina after the hurricane, and many of them are
Speaker 1: living in tents as it's going down below freezing there
Speaker 1: while the FEMA. People are living and heated trailers, and
Speaker 1: while migrants who are coming into our country are being
Speaker 1: given hotel accommodations. They hate us. Our government in Washington
Speaker 1: hates us, and that's not going to change with Trump.
Speaker 1: It's not going to change. Tax Slave, thank you for
Speaker 1: the tip, he says, thank you for your principal courage
Speaker 1: to speak the truth. Love your music too well, Thank you.
Speaker 1: I think that's very kind. David Morasses, thank you for
Speaker 1: the tip. Thank you very much. And Dougalug thank you
Speaker 1: as well. He says. Let's hit the like button and
Speaker 1: spread the good word. Thank you, Please do please hit
Speaker 1: the like button. By the way, I got a very
Speaker 1: sad message from the owner of Huge Tube. They're going
Speaker 1: to be shutting down and it's difficult to get honest
Speaker 1: places that don't censor your shadow band you, so if
Speaker 1: you would like the broadcast, that would help us on
Speaker 1: the places where we are. And we're constantly looking for
Speaker 1: new places and I'll let you know if we find them.
Speaker 1: We got onto Roku that didn't last too long until
Speaker 1: they shut us down there, and we paid a lot
Speaker 1: to get on there, paid a lot to the guy
Speaker 1: to sponsor it, but it wasn't Roku specifically, but as
Speaker 1: the people who set the thing up. They had it
Speaker 1: on Vimeo and we said, well, you know, Vimeo is
Speaker 1: going to shut us down. But he says, well, this
Speaker 1: is just a temporary thing. Well, we're still waiting for
Speaker 1: the final solution that's going to allow us to get
Speaker 1: onto rokus. Our Roku channel is down as well. Angry Tiger,
Speaker 1: good to see you there. Trump's cabinet was full of
Speaker 1: neo con alligators and medical tyranny snakes. He is super
Speaker 1: charging the swamp. Makes me want to vomit in my shoes. Yes, yes,
Speaker 1: it is amazing. It is amazing when you look at
Speaker 1: his picks here and even you know, when you look
Speaker 1: at rfk jor you hope, well, maybe he's gonna shake
Speaker 1: some things up. And yet what does he do. He
Speaker 1: recommends somebody like Marty McCarey, and it's not Marty mcarey,
Speaker 1: but it's Mark Marky Mark in New Jersey. Thank you
Speaker 1: for the tip. In the comment, he says, Scott Bessant
Speaker 1: is more proof that Donald J. Trump is Soros's puppet.
Speaker 1: That's what I will put there. That's his second choice
Speaker 1: of words there. Yeah, absolutely right. Well, and it's just
Speaker 1: amazing that people will not look at this stuff. We're
Speaker 1: going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: The Dude Abides Man, The Dude Abides. Yeah, it's sad
Speaker 1: to see Jeff Bridges in real life who he supports,
Speaker 1: but says, David, what do you think about aj being
Speaker 1: Sandy hooked and not jailed with the J six for
Speaker 1: a stop to steal rally mischief? Dude, Well you might have.
Speaker 1: I have talked about this quite a bit, so I'm
Speaker 1: not going to go back into it again. I'll just
Speaker 1: say that all the people who look at Alex as
Speaker 1: a martyr for free speech say anything, but I mean,
Speaker 1: it's not even uh he you know what he said
Speaker 1: about saying I think was defensible. Even if he's wrong,
Speaker 1: it's defensible. And we're going to talk about that. And
Speaker 1: when we talk about free speech, you have a right
Speaker 1: to be wrong about something. And if you don't allow
Speaker 1: somebody to have a difference of opinion, if you're going
Speaker 1: to criminalize dissent, if you're going to criminalize questions, that's
Speaker 1: what we wind up with. And he should have he
Speaker 1: should have he should have fought for free speech, but
Speaker 1: instead he didn't. Instead, what he decided that he was
Speaker 1: going to do was to delay it as much as
Speaker 1: possible for his own particular he chose not to comply,
Speaker 1: and then he presented it as if he had been railroaded,
Speaker 1: and yet he got caught on the stand and people
Speaker 1: still don't pay attention to it. Even Alex realized it
Speaker 1: when his lawyer sent information that was on Alex's phone
Speaker 1: that they had asked for and he refused to comply
Speaker 1: with it. Again, if you don't comply with discovery, you lose,
Speaker 1: just like if somebody files a lawsuit against you and
Speaker 1: you don't respond, you lose by default. And so he
Speaker 1: chose not to defend free speech. And then you got
Speaker 1: all the people who say, well, you know he was right,
Speaker 1: that didn't happen. And yet Alex has been on both
Speaker 1: sides of this issue, as he usually is. And so
Speaker 1: when you look at the J six stuff, I think
Speaker 1: that is a red flag. And I know when I
Speaker 1: was there it was Steve Pachennik who kicked off this
Speaker 1: whole idea of stop the steal and the J sixth
Speaker 1: thing two days after the election. So I think it
Speaker 1: had the Intelligence Communitee written all over it. I think
Speaker 1: it was a horrific scam. And we can talk about
Speaker 1: the Jay sixers as well when we talk about free speech.
Speaker 1: That's part of the First Amendment. They had a right
Speaker 1: to show up there. And you got a lot of
Speaker 1: people still being uh tried, convicted and jailed in the
Speaker 1: waning days of the Biden administration, and people who were
Speaker 1: not violent. And here's you know, J Six's a good
Speaker 1: example of this. If somebody got violent, that's the thing,
Speaker 1: right you deal with that. That's a crime. And so
Speaker 1: if you're gonna you're gonna, you know, grab the shield
Speaker 1: away from a cop and beat him with it, and
Speaker 1: you're gonna smash out the window of a building and
Speaker 1: enter it, that's a crime. It always has been, and
Speaker 1: for good reason. But all the people who just showed
Speaker 1: up and you know, peacefully walked in as the doors
Speaker 1: were opened, and the police were standing there allowing people
Speaker 1: to walk in, not telling people that you're instead inviting
Speaker 1: people in, like the elderly two guys and one of
Speaker 1: them's son who was middle aged. They wanted to use
Speaker 1: the restroom. They asked the cops. They said yes, right
Speaker 1: in here they go in there. Now they're looking at
Speaker 1: six or seven years in jail because they went in
Speaker 1: to use a restroom and the top it off. When
Speaker 1: they came out. They knew they were going to go
Speaker 1: back out the way that they came in, and there
Speaker 1: was a cop there that was directing them onto the
Speaker 1: floor of the house. It was all set up, and
Speaker 1: Alex was part of that set up, and so was Trump.
Speaker 1: And Trump could have pardoned and should have pardoned all
Speaker 1: of those people, and he had the power to do that.
Speaker 1: This whole Insurrection Act that was there. Andrew Johnson, who
Speaker 1: took Abraham Lincoln's place, the Insurrection Act was put in
Speaker 1: by people who wanted to take revenge on the Confederates,
Speaker 1: and he said, no, we've had enough civil war. We're
Speaker 1: going to stop it. And he gave a blanket amnesty
Speaker 1: to all of them in spite of the newly passed
Speaker 1: Insurrection Act. More recently, you had Gerald Ford who pardoned
Speaker 1: Richard Nixon before he was ever indicted for anything, because
Speaker 1: he thought the Democrats are going to be vindictive on it,
Speaker 1: so he pardoned Richard Nixon. Trump could have and should
Speaker 1: have hardened to all the JA sixers, but if he
Speaker 1: would have done that, it would have put him in
Speaker 1: the hot seat, and so he threw them under the
Speaker 1: bus to save himself. They're disgusting, but it's a First
Speaker 1: Amendment issue as well. The violent crimes could have and
Speaker 1: should have been punished. But to punish people for showing
Speaker 1: up and redressing their grievances peacefully, that's protected speech. And
Speaker 1: so when we look at what has happened in Canada,
Speaker 1: for example, Trudeau accused of fiddling as jew haters burn
Speaker 1: Montreal in a riot. Trudeau acknowledged an anti Semitic riot
Speaker 1: the night before. What we saw in the streets of
Speaker 1: Montreal last night was appalling. Acts of anti Semitism, intimidation
Speaker 1: and violence must be condemned wherever we see them, he said.
Speaker 1: And so he said there must be consequences, and rioters
Speaker 1: must be held accountable. Yes, they should be held accountable
Speaker 1: for arson, for riot, for a salt, for battery, but
Speaker 1: not for anti semitism. That's punishing speech, that's punishing thought.
Speaker 1: And I will never support the eradication of free speech. Look,
Speaker 1: hatred can be a motivation, and always in the past
Speaker 1: that was an important part of a trial. Does this
Speaker 1: person have motivation, they show prior hatred of this individual,
Speaker 1: this group, or whatever. But it was the crime, the
Speaker 1: actual crime that they would be punished for. Otherwise, you
Speaker 1: make what people think or what you think they think
Speaker 1: a crime. You make dissent a crime. People have a
Speaker 1: right to be wrong, and that was what the case
Speaker 1: with Alex Jones should have been about. I have the
Speaker 1: right to be wrong if I'm wrong. Should have defended that,
Speaker 1: and I think he would have won. But he chose
Speaker 1: again not to participate in the legal process, and a
Speaker 1: lot of people are choosing not to participate in the
Speaker 1: first Amendment of the Constitution by making hate speech a crime.
Speaker 1: And you can never make that a crime for any
Speaker 1: group or for any agenda, because look, we've all been
Speaker 1: well we've probably you have as well as I have
Speaker 1: been punished because of what we had to say about
Speaker 1: the lockdowns, or about the vaccines, or prior to that,
Speaker 1: what I had to say about the climate a guffin,
Speaker 1: being a lie, being a grift. And I am sick
Speaker 1: and tired of people who will not engage in debate,
Speaker 1: but they respond to anything that you do by censoring you.
Speaker 1: First of all, they just say, well, it's settled right,
Speaker 1: the science is settled or this is settled or whatever,
Speaker 1: and you're wrong. You're on the wrong side, so we're
Speaker 1: going to shut you down. I am not going to
Speaker 1: support that. That's the reason we have the First Amendment.
Speaker 1: Polliever Pierre, the guy who's the concider, I don't know
Speaker 1: how to pronounce his last name, criticizing Trudeau. He has
Speaker 1: time to dance and to do selfies, but he's too
Speaker 1: busy to condemn a violent Hamas takeover of our streets.
Speaker 1: Violent mobs riot and rampage. And that's the key. It's
Speaker 1: the violence that's the crime. Their hatred is not a crime.
Speaker 1: Lies that they tell should not be a crime. If
Speaker 1: they've got the wrong. If you disagree with them, again,
Speaker 1: you will not have any free speech if we're going
Speaker 1: to punish people who hurt other people's feelings and who
Speaker 1: determines what is right and wrong, who determines their speech.
Speaker 1: Yesterday the streets of Montreal were burning while pro Hamas
Speaker 1: thugs were rampaging the Michael Lovett, president of CEO and
Speaker 1: Friends of Simon Wisenthal Center, said for over a year,
Speaker 1: the pro Hamas mob has been consistently spreading hate and
Speaker 1: anti Semitism on the streets of Montreal and other Canadian
Speaker 1: cities with impunity. They should be allowed to do that.
Speaker 1: They have a right to do that. If we're going
Speaker 1: to have free speech, that is not a crime. It
Speaker 1: may be reprehensible, it may be wrong, but it is
Speaker 1: not a crime. And the appropriate response to that is
Speaker 1: to use your free speech, not to use law enforcement
Speaker 1: against the people that you have a disagreement with. That
Speaker 1: is absolutely reprehensible. You know, we had a case of
Speaker 1: we had a case in Germany. A guy who is
Speaker 1: a pensioner retire and he posted a meme of this
Speaker 1: guy who is the Green he's some Green minister, right,
Speaker 1: and he put the thing up in the German was
Speaker 1: something that meant weakhead, something cop Okay, forget what it was.
Speaker 1: I don't have the article in front of me. Meant
Speaker 1: to get to it last week. I didn't. But this
Speaker 1: guy is one Green minister has filed over eight hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty three complaints with the police for people who
Speaker 1: criticized him. It's against the law to criticize a minister
Speaker 1: in Germany and why is that should that be allowed?
Speaker 1: And the number two person who has filed the most
Speaker 1: complaints is another Greenie, and he's filed over five hundred complaints,
Speaker 1: about five hundred and fifty. So one of them is
Speaker 1: like eight hundred and fifty, the O one's five hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty. Between the two of them, fourteen hundred complaints
Speaker 1: they filed against individual citizens. Well, this particular one, because
Speaker 1: this guy reposted a meme and I think it was
Speaker 1: on Twitter. He gets a you know, full militarized police
Speaker 1: raid with guns drawn, door kicked in and all the
Speaker 1: rest of this stuff right because of that, because of that,
Speaker 1: and so and it was because of his complaint, and
Speaker 1: as Eugipius wrote, he had a very very good article
Speaker 1: and a lot of humor in it as well, sardonic humor,
Speaker 1: I guess. But he said, for the longest time, you
Speaker 1: can have these atrocities happen, and then something finally happens
Speaker 1: to wake people up. And so this, I guess is
Speaker 1: kind of there peanut the squirrel moment when it comes
Speaker 1: to free speech. And people saw what happened to this
Speaker 1: retired guy over a meme that this politician took offense
Speaker 1: at and then sent the police, militarized police rate on
Speaker 1: this guy for that. And he's actually running for prime
Speaker 1: minister or whatever it is. He's running for a higher office.
Speaker 1: And so he was questioned on all this stuff and
Speaker 1: he said, well, I'm just following the complaint because it
Speaker 1: violated the law. And then it's out of my hands.
Speaker 1: I don't have anything to do with a police raid
Speaker 1: or with the courts. That's they make that determination. Just
Speaker 1: washed his hands of it, doesn't take the responsibility for
Speaker 1: that at all. Truly is amazing. Oh and by the way,
Speaker 1: he is a weakhead. He has a doomkoff. Right, it
Speaker 1: wasn't that. That wasn't the phrase. It was something else.
Speaker 1: I looked at the thought what does that mean. I
Speaker 1: knew the last part of it was head. I looked
Speaker 1: it up in his weekhead. In other words, he's stupid
Speaker 1: and in protest his picture that that meme that the
Speaker 1: guy reposted, it's a picture of him with that thing,
Speaker 1: you know, weakhead or stupid that is being posted all
Speaker 1: over Germany. Now it's like the streisand effect. Somebody said,
Speaker 1: it's going to become his picture is always going to
Speaker 1: be linked with that phrase because of this. But that's
Speaker 1: the issue, right, that is the issue. Are we going
Speaker 1: to be allowed to criticize government. Are we are we
Speaker 1: going to be allowed to Chris Ey's a foreign government, Well,
Speaker 1: not in America, because they seem to own the politicians here.
Speaker 1: So our leaders in government have repeatedly turned away or
Speaker 1: tried to play both sides. So the guy who's the
Speaker 1: CEO of Friends of Simon Wisenthal Center, well, you know
Speaker 1: you play both sides if you say, well, people can
Speaker 1: say whatever they wish as long as they don't get violent.
Speaker 1: I guess I would be considered a playing both sides.
Speaker 1: I guess I would be considered I by support free
Speaker 1: speech by saying I may abhor what you say, but
Speaker 1: I will defend your right to say it. That's a
Speaker 1: distillation of what we're talking about here. It doesn't imply
Speaker 1: that you agree with somebody, but you must if we're
Speaker 1: going to have free speech, you must tolerate them. Even
Speaker 1: if you believe that they're wrong and hateful. You must
Speaker 1: tolerate them. But they are intolerant of this, So only
Speaker 1: burning and violence are crimes. The answer to hate and
Speaker 1: lies is debate, and if we have the ability to debate,
Speaker 1: we can do that. butN I Brith in Canada stated
Speaker 1: that the rallies which masquerade as calls for peace, are
Speaker 1: frequently devolved into platforms for rhetoric deeply incompatible with Canadian
Speaker 1: values of inclusivity, mutual respect and unity. Now let me
Speaker 1: just give you this is a guy who used to
Speaker 1: work for Masad, and he knows exactly how this works.
Speaker 1: And as he points out, these they would use the
Speaker 1: claim of anti Semitism to attack people who did not
Speaker 1: support Israel, the government of Israel, political Israel. And he said,
Speaker 1: we typically would run it through benigh Bareath. I know
Speaker 1: what they do because I used to ask them to
Speaker 1: do it.
Speaker 7: I mean when I was in the Messada, we had
Speaker 7: a guy that gave us problems in the US, and
Speaker 7: he was speaking out and he was talking like Pete
Speaker 7: talked once and said, Israel is bombing Libanon cluster bombs.
Speaker 7: We say, hey, who's that guy?
Speaker 3: You know?
Speaker 1: Pick mccacky.
Speaker 7: We used to call him, yeah, which is Peete the cockroache,
Speaker 7: because he makes a lot of noise and you can't
Speaker 7: get rid of him.
Speaker 1: So what you do is you get in.
Speaker 7: Touch with the guy in the in the station in
Speaker 7: New York or in the station in Washington. You say,
Speaker 7: tell the guys at Benaghbor to label him, and of
Speaker 7: course the candaign starts before you know it, the guy's
Speaker 7: labeling and he's an anti Semer because that's what we
Speaker 7: say is and that's one stain you cannot wash.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 7: It shames me as a Jew to tell you that,
Speaker 7: but that's the fact, and it's.
Speaker 1: Wrong, and they're still doing it, and that's what they're
Speaker 1: going to Donagh Boath of Canada, going to label these
Speaker 1: people as anti Semitic. Now some of them are anti Semitic,
Speaker 1: but they use that as a control tactic and they
Speaker 1: use it to control politicians. You know, one of as
Speaker 1: a matter of fact, it's not the same guy that
Speaker 1: was Victor Ostrovsky, but Arson Ostrovsky is calling for exactly
Speaker 1: that thing, the same type of thing. You know, we
Speaker 1: have to punish, get the government to punish these people.
Speaker 1: And he said, at least in Israel we got the
Speaker 1: iron dome. In Canada you have justin Trudeau. And so
Speaker 1: when we talk about an iron dome, they talked about
Speaker 1: having an iron dome in terms of controlling politicians even
Speaker 1: in local elections.
Speaker 6: Just just for you and everybody to know who's watching.
Speaker 6: After October seventh, we did implement what internally, I kind
Speaker 6: of call it an iron dome for Israel here in
Speaker 6: the US, where we're monitoring every elected official at every
Speaker 6: level of government, every school board mission is from social
Speaker 6: media to press releases to official documents, were monitoring all
Speaker 6: of it. So all of these city councils and the
Speaker 6: members who voted, we know who voted where, we know
Speaker 6: who voted what, and we'll be watching them as they
Speaker 6: move along their career and hopefully working to stop them.
Speaker 1: Pretty amazing, even for school board or for city council,
Speaker 1: We're going to stop these people, even at the local level.
Speaker 1: That's what they're doing. That's why they own the American government.
Speaker 1: Anti NATO protesters burned cars in Canada headline from r
Speaker 1: t H and that was anti NATO. That was the
Speaker 1: next day, So I guess these people also guilty of
Speaker 1: anti natoism. NATO is a political entity, just like Israel
Speaker 1: is a political entity. Are we allowed to oppose nettan Yahoo?
Speaker 1: Are we allowed to oppose NATO?
Speaker 3: Oh?
Speaker 1: Now, the NATO the anti NATO rally because NATO was
Speaker 1: having his annual summit there in that city in Montreal,
Speaker 1: and the anti NATO protesters were peaceful until you had
Speaker 1: some anti Israeli protesters show up. They burned an effigy
Speaker 1: Prime Minister net and Yahoo. They began hurling flares and
Speaker 1: projectiles at riot officers. We'll punish that, Punish that. That
Speaker 1: is something that should be punished, if you are throwing
Speaker 1: flares and projectiles at people and that type of thing.
Speaker 1: Punish that, But not the speech, not the thought. And again,
Speaker 1: you know this is a we're living in a time
Speaker 1: when because we've been told by the media, we've been
Speaker 1: told by Hollywood, we shouldn't have free speech. And we
Speaker 1: know where that's coming from. These people who are pushing
Speaker 1: at the government does not want you to have free
Speaker 1: speech to oppose anything that's on their agenda. And they've
Speaker 1: got agendas. They've got agendas for pandemics and for the
Speaker 1: Green New Deal all the rest of stuff. And so
Speaker 1: Trump and Congress are gearing up to fight campus anti semitism.
Speaker 1: This is some real clear politics. Trump said my first
Speaker 1: week back in the Oval office, my administration will inform
Speaker 1: every college president that if you do not in anti
Speaker 1: Semitic propaganda, they will lose their accreditation and federal taxpayer support. Well,
Speaker 1: I support getting rid of taxpayer support. For universities completely,
Speaker 1: but not for these reasons, not for a purpose of
Speaker 1: intimidating free speech. I think we should stop giving them
Speaker 1: money categorically, but don't use this as a leverage to
Speaker 1: stop free speech. You know, I remember I grew up
Speaker 1: at a time when you had all these campus protesters
Speaker 1: were protesting the Vietnam War, not Gaza. And did you
Speaker 1: have a situation then when they threatened to, you know,
Speaker 1: threaten the universities with their with money. Again, this is
Speaker 1: like I said, federal money is always used for bribery
Speaker 1: or blackmail. You do this and I'll give you money.
Speaker 1: You do that, I'll take your money away from you.
Speaker 1: But we didn't have that kind of bribery and blackmail
Speaker 1: over the anti war protests over Vietnam. Why is that?
Speaker 1: It's because we had higher we had higher respect for
Speaker 1: the free speech. Conservatives and liberals at that point in time,
Speaker 1: they were not going to shut down universities because they
Speaker 1: didn't like because you had protesters protesting a war. You
Speaker 1: have a right to protest a war. You don't have
Speaker 1: a right to taxpayer money for your university, by the way,
Speaker 1: but you do have a right to protest to war.
Speaker 1: So what Trump in political Israel don't realize is that
Speaker 1: their calls to censor people are going to blow back
Speaker 1: on them, and rightfully so. You know the way that
Speaker 1: they have conducted this war, and again it's a separate
Speaker 1: issue than how the war begins, but the conduct of
Speaker 1: the war is a separate issue, and their conduct of
Speaker 1: the war has been reprehensible. And their conduct in terms
Speaker 1: of pushing a war against our Constitution, our First Amendment,
Speaker 1: and the values that have been established over one thousand years,
Speaker 1: are absolutely reprehensible. As they write in real clear politics.
Speaker 1: First Amendment gives wide latitude to foolish, dishonest, and hateful utterances.
Speaker 1: If we're going to start throwing people in jail because
Speaker 1: you hurt somebody's feelings, there's no stopping it. We don't
Speaker 1: want to unleash that Pandora's box. And yet Trump and
Speaker 1: the Republicans are doing it over and over again. You've
Speaker 1: had DeSantis, and you've had the legislature, the Republican legislature
Speaker 1: in Florida, you've had christineom Now Donald Trump and the
Speaker 1: Republicans in Congress are going to shut down criticism of
Speaker 1: a foreign political entity. And it's just you know, when
Speaker 1: you look at this and I just want to say
Speaker 1: to the Christians out there that if you support this
Speaker 1: kind of Zionism because you believe that God is on
Speaker 1: israel side, that God is going to give them the land,
Speaker 1: go back and read the story of what happened with Hagar.
Speaker 1: You know, God promised Abraham a son when he was
Speaker 1: very old and Sarah was very old, and it didn't happen. Now,
Speaker 1: he believed God, but it wasn't happening. So he pulls
Speaker 1: out his Bible and says, God helps those who help themselves.
Speaker 1: He didn't have a Bible, and the Bible doesn't say that.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, the story of Abraham and
Speaker 1: Hagar and Ishmael is an example of why we don't
Speaker 1: help ourselves. Abraham believed God, but he wasn't going to
Speaker 1: sit there and wait for it to happen. He's going
Speaker 1: to make it happen himself. And folks, we got a
Speaker 1: Zionism has got a problem. It's got a Hagar Ishmael problem.
Speaker 1: They've decided that they're going to make it happen on
Speaker 1: their own. They believe God. They think that God is
Speaker 1: going to do something or whatever, and they're going to
Speaker 1: make it happen on their own. Now, the ultra Orthodox
Speaker 1: Jews don't agree with that, and they said, well, we
Speaker 1: think God is going to give us a land, but
Speaker 1: we're going to let him do it, do it miraculously,
Speaker 1: We're not going to try to do it in our
Speaker 1: own strength, on our own schedule. But Christian Zionists here
Speaker 1: in America who give a blank check to Israel to
Speaker 1: do anything that they want, regardless of how obviously immoral
Speaker 1: and corrupt and just it is, they give them a
Speaker 1: blank check. They've got a Hagar problem. You know. Sarah
Speaker 1: said to Abraham, I've got a servant, Hagar, sleep with her,
Speaker 1: and we'll call that your son, right, Ishmael. And then
Speaker 1: she turned against her and ran Hagar and Ishmael off
Speaker 1: into the wilderness. And God took care of Hagar. But
Speaker 1: you wound up with Ishmael, who has been a thorn
Speaker 1: in the side for Israel and Israel's descendants forever. And
Speaker 1: you wind up with all kinds of unintended consequences that
Speaker 1: have very long lasting effects when you decide that you're
Speaker 1: not going to wait for God to do it in
Speaker 1: his timing and in his way, but you're going to
Speaker 1: do it yourself. So the fight against campus anti semitism
Speaker 1: must distinguish, says Alaw School professor David Bernstein. It must
Speaker 1: distinguish speech that is protected from actions such as harassment, vandalism,
Speaker 1: occupation of campus property. Those actions are not private universities
Speaker 1: if they choose to narrow the range of permissible speech
Speaker 1: to shield students sensibilities from supposedly offensive speech and so
Speaker 1: so they can do that if they're a private university.
Speaker 1: Public universities operate subject to the First Amendment. Again, it's
Speaker 1: the money. It's the money. It's not about And I seriously,
Speaker 1: I don't think that the officials in a public university
Speaker 1: swear to uphold and defend the constitution. Like people who
Speaker 1: are taking public office to you know, the military, people
Speaker 1: are in police, even people who have elected office, they
Speaker 1: take the oath of office to uphold the Constitution. I
Speaker 1: don't think that happens in public universities. They just swear
Speaker 1: that they're going to get the money from the federal
Speaker 1: government over by hooker by crook. But again, it is
Speaker 1: if we're going to shut down free speech, this is
Speaker 1: where it starts. And this intolerance for things like privacy,
Speaker 1: for things like free speech. This intolerance is being inculcated
Speaker 1: in the universities they used to try to do just
Speaker 1: the opposite. And notwithstanding, the federal government possesses effective tools
Speaker 1: to impel colleges and universities to honor civil rights. No. No,
Speaker 1: if you're going to lock people up because they protest,
Speaker 1: that's the opposite of honoring civil rights. You don't have
Speaker 1: a right to not be offended. Sorry about that. Go
Speaker 1: take your hurt feelings and talk to people with their pronouns.
Speaker 1: I'm not going to use your pronouns, and I'm not
Speaker 1: going to lay off of criticizing Israel, especially if they
Speaker 1: are going to push for the eradication of the First
Speaker 1: Amendment to protect their feelings. Your feelings don't need to
Speaker 1: be protected. Our rights do. And it's not your civil
Speaker 1: rights not to not to have your feelings hurt. Free
Speaker 1: speech is civil rights. And if you're offended, tough, get tough,
Speaker 1: speak out. Since one of Jewish people had a problem
Speaker 1: speaking out. Now in Europe, we've got anti Christian hate
Speaker 1: crimes all over Europe. They have tripled in twenty twenty three.
Speaker 1: Do you see the Christians calling demanding for censorship. No,
Speaker 1: and guess what, it's the same people doing it. It's
Speaker 1: the Muslims who are coming in that are doing the
Speaker 1: anti Christians, the same as it is Muslim supporters and
Speaker 1: Muslim migrants doing it in the US. And yet we
Speaker 1: don't have Christians calling for censorship, but we do have
Speaker 1: political Israel the Ishmaelites calling for censorship. Anti Christian hate
Speaker 1: crimes in Europe have more than tripled from twenty twenty
Speaker 1: three to from twenty twenty two to twenty twenty three.
Speaker 1: A twenty twenty four report that was released November fifteenth,
Speaker 1: the Observatory on Intolerance and Discrimination against Christians in Europe
Speaker 1: said that a total of four hundred and forty four
Speaker 1: anti Christian hate crimes were committed in twenty twenty three,
Speaker 1: and contrasts to seven hundred and forty nine and twenty
Speaker 1: twenty two. The hate crimes consisted largely of vandalism and
Speaker 1: some arson. There was also desecration against sacred images at churches,
Speaker 1: so hate is a factor here. These Islamic perpetrators hate Christianity,
Speaker 1: so the vandalization, they desecrate churches and they set them
Speaker 1: on fire as well. Violent anti Christian hate crimes by
Speaker 1: radical Muslims played a large swath of Europe in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty three. The reports I had a few examples, such
Speaker 1: as the January twenty twenty three incident in Spain where
Speaker 1: a jihadist killed an altar server and injured four people
Speaker 1: with a machete as he shouted al Huakbar and death
Speaker 1: to Christians. By the way, they translate that as Allah
Speaker 1: is great, that's not what they're saying. Allah is greater.
Speaker 1: Allah is greater than your God is what they're saying.
Speaker 1: And of course they have to since Allah is so
Speaker 1: great he can't defend himself, they have to do it
Speaker 1: for him. Kind of like the Israelis right in that regard.
Speaker 1: God can't act to help Israel. They've got to do
Speaker 1: it on their own. Same thing with these Islamic shihatists.
Speaker 1: Allah is greater, but he's not so great that he
Speaker 1: can defend himself. They've got to defend him. And the UK,
Speaker 1: a convert to Christianity from Islam was stabbed six times
Speaker 1: by his Muslim roommate, who had begun to threaten him
Speaker 1: after he converted. In Italy, a Tunisian Christian convert was
Speaker 1: beaten and robbed by a mob of Islamic fellow Tunisians
Speaker 1: for attending a Christian church. The European country with the
Speaker 1: highest number of recorded anti Christian hate crimes about one thousand,
Speaker 1: was France, so they had about half of them, nearly
Speaker 1: half of them in France. About ninety percent of the
Speaker 1: incidents targeted churches or cemeteries, according to the French Ministry
Speaker 1: of the Interior, and a trend that has seen historic
Speaker 1: French churches damaged and devastated through arson. Arson is a
Speaker 1: very serious crime. It is one of the most serious
Speaker 1: crimes because it frequently leads to death. Speech, however, is
Speaker 1: not a crime. Speech is not a crime. Hate is
Speaker 1: not a crime, and we don't have Christians out there
Speaker 1: calling for the suspension of free speech because of this.
Speaker 1: And January twenty twenty three alone, four churches in Paris
Speaker 1: were targeted by arson attacks involving molotov cocktails. A total
Speaker 1: of fourteen arson attacks were committed in France from January
Speaker 1: to October twenty twenty four, according to the French Religious
Speaker 1: Heritage Observatory. So as this is happening in the Netherlands again,
Speaker 1: we keep seeing this political speech, right, this is a
Speaker 1: person name is Riza Bluemesche and I don't know, I'm
Speaker 1: certain I'm not pronouncing the last name correctly, But she said,
Speaker 1: I am not the only one standing here facing trial today. Politicians,
Speaker 1: opinion makers and critical citizens on the right are being
Speaker 1: prosecuted by the system, and they're prosecuting at the moment her.
Speaker 1: But she's pointing out that this is coming for everybody.
Speaker 1: And again, this is political, and again much of what
Speaker 1: is set the certainly Muslims hate christian they hate Jews,
Speaker 1: they hate everybody else, they even hate each other. She
Speaker 1: is the sheites, the hobbyists and many others, right, But
Speaker 1: the thing that has kick this off are the actions
Speaker 1: of a government. And now this foreign government says you're
Speaker 1: not going to be allowed to criticize it, and the Netherlands,
Speaker 1: this woman is standing trau because she criticized the government,
Speaker 1: just like those fourteen hundred people who criticize those green
Speaker 1: politicians committed crimes because they criticized government ministers. Is that
Speaker 1: the kind of world that we want to live in?
Speaker 1: Is that the kind of world that we want imposed
Speaker 1: on us by a foreign government that is hell bent
Speaker 1: on shutting down our First Amendment? And who knows how
Speaker 1: many others that are there, and the Republicans who are
Speaker 1: so servile to support them and do whatever they say.
Speaker 1: The answer to politically driven charges of group insult and defamation.
Speaker 1: The case which stems from tweets that challenged, in this
Speaker 1: particular case, challenged mass immigration and exposing rising violence. So
Speaker 1: in this particular case, she's criticizing the fact that Muslims
Speaker 1: are being brought in, radical violent Muslims are being brought in,
Speaker 1: and the government say shut up. Prosecutors have taken aim
Speaker 1: at Riza her pointed critiques of rising violence and immigration policies,
Speaker 1: labeling her statements offensive and hateful. So the people are
Speaker 1: coming in and are committing anti Christian hate crimes and
Speaker 1: setting fire to churches and all the rest of this stuff,
Speaker 1: you're not allowed to criticize their hate. And if you
Speaker 1: criticize their hate, then you're the one who gets charges
Speaker 1: brought against you. See, this is the twisted things that
Speaker 1: happen when we allow the government to decide what kind
Speaker 1: of speech is allowed and what kind of speech is not.
Speaker 1: It's always going to be this pretzel of uh, you know,
Speaker 1: contradictions in it. We're going to take a quick break,
Speaker 1: excuse me and get my voice back and we'll be
Speaker 1: We'll be right back.
Speaker 3: M m.
Speaker 5: H m.
Speaker 3: H m hm.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: Welcome back, and Eric, thank you very much for the tip.
Speaker 1: I really do appreciate that. And let me say thank you.
Speaker 1: A couple of people who say contributions. I think I
Speaker 1: read their name on Friday, but I did not read
Speaker 1: their note. This is coming from Brent and Ingrid and
Speaker 1: I said we love hearing Karen's laughter off screen and
Speaker 1: again so grateful and so I'd really do appreciate that.
Speaker 1: That is that is very kind and said that we
Speaker 1: have a way to pierce the darkness with truth. That
Speaker 1: is absolutely true. This is from Patricia and Matt says.
Speaker 1: My husband Matt has been listening to you since earlier
Speaker 1: this year. He listens to your show while driving for
Speaker 1: his job. He referred me to the show, and I
Speaker 1: can happily say that I now stream your show through
Speaker 1: Rumble on my work computer. Well, thank you very much.
Speaker 1: So we're big fans of g. Edward Griffin and appreciate
Speaker 1: you bringing his book World Without Cancer to everyone's attention.
Speaker 1: We freely share the information with everyone we know who
Speaker 1: might benefit from it. From that show and others where
Speaker 1: John Richardson discussed the benefit of apricot seeds, we purchased
Speaker 1: the seeds and lateral supplements from his company. And again
Speaker 1: that is easy to remember. RNC store dot com. It's
Speaker 1: like Republican National Committee, except they're the good RNC. So
Speaker 1: it's RNC store dot com. And if you use a
Speaker 1: code night you can save ten percent off there. I
Speaker 1: just want to say before I move on to another topic,
Speaker 1: when we look at and this is coming from the
Speaker 1: post millennial J sixers across the US are sentenced to
Speaker 1: years in prison under Lame Duck Biden administration Department of Justice,
Speaker 1: and why is that happening? What could have been done
Speaker 1: to permit that? As I said before, what they did
Speaker 1: except for the violence. The violence is a separate issue,
Speaker 1: and there weren't that many people who were violent. But again,
Speaker 1: come after them for the violence. They have used excessive
Speaker 1: punishment for everything, and they've made things that were protected
Speaker 1: speech out of the First Amendment. They've made that a crime.
Speaker 1: Trump chose not to protect the First Amendment. That's why
Speaker 1: these people are in jeopardy. He chose not to protect
Speaker 1: the First Amendment. He chose not to pardon them, and
Speaker 1: that's the key thing. Well, let's talk a little bit
Speaker 1: about food and the egg shortage that we mentioned earlier.
Speaker 1: Egg shortages and price increte increase hit the US for
Speaker 1: the holiday season. Folks. We've got pandemic prices here now,
Speaker 1: empty shells. Pandemic prices. Why, Well, because of a supposed pandemic.
Speaker 1: This is supposedly because of bird flu. Breitbart again uncritically
Speaker 1: reports what is happening. Americans may find it hard to
Speaker 1: get eggs this holiday season because of bird flu outbreaks
Speaker 1: and the economy. And they make this all about Biden
Speaker 1: and they just accept the fact that there's a bird
Speaker 1: flu epidemic. Breitbart, there is no bird flu epidemic. We
Speaker 1: got an epidemic of PCR tests. Get with the how
Speaker 1: long does it take you to catch on? It's been
Speaker 1: four years now since we were lied into this pandemic
Speaker 1: with PCR results. And it's man who knows forty years
Speaker 1: since Fauci mishues the PCR to say that that AIDS
Speaker 1: was caused by a virus HIV, and the inventor of
Speaker 1: that who won the Nobel price, said you can't prove
Speaker 1: that using my PCR test. You're abusing that. So there's
Speaker 1: been a shortage of eggs in some stores across the nation.
Speaker 1: CBS News reported on Friday. More than forty percent of
Speaker 1: the nation's roughly three hundred million egg laying hens are
Speaker 1: raised in cage free facilities, but roughly sixty percent of
Speaker 1: bird flu cases recently detected involve cage free farms. They say, okay,
Speaker 1: so we have to it's going to come after the
Speaker 1: birds that are in cage free farms. Wouldn't you think
Speaker 1: that if it was the flu, that it was contagious
Speaker 1: and it was a flu, wouldn't you expect the birds
Speaker 1: that are more cooped up to you know, closely confined
Speaker 1: and not allowed to get out get fresh air. Would
Speaker 1: you expect to see it more than But let's not
Speaker 1: question any of that. Let's just accept whatever we're told
Speaker 1: by the people who say they are science, and the
Speaker 1: science is settled. In April, America's largest producer of fresh
Speaker 1: eggs temporarily stop production at its Texas plant because a
Speaker 1: bird flu and its chickens. Says Breitbart, No, it was
Speaker 1: because of a PCR test. It is important to note
Speaker 1: that the cost of eggs rows one hundred and forty
Speaker 1: seven percent since Biden became president. And then the rest
Speaker 1: of this is more partisan bs from Breitbart instead of
Speaker 1: attacking the real issue, which is a fake pandemic. Then
Speaker 1: we have zero head Jake. Price is surge again as
Speaker 1: grocers face shortages amid a bird flu outbreak. No, no,
Speaker 1: it is a PCR test. The Washington Post reports that
Speaker 1: consumers are growing increasingly frustrated DC area grocery stores for
Speaker 1: signs read temporarily out of eggs. Bird flu is my
Speaker 1: far the biggest factor involved with egg prices. As bird
Speaker 1: flu comes and goes, our egg prices ride the wave,
Speaker 1: said the Farm Bureau spokesperson an economists working for them. Well,
Speaker 1: you just take whatever they tell you, and that's the
Speaker 1: foundation for truth. You never question what they have to say.
Speaker 1: You just look at the knock on effects. Earlier this year,
Speaker 1: doctor Robert Redfield, former head of the CDC under Trump,
Speaker 1: sounded the alarm about bird flu, says zero hedge. And
Speaker 1: of course what was he saying. He said, bird flu
Speaker 1: is going to be our next pandemic for humans. Well,
Speaker 1: we just accept that, right, zero Hedge. We don't question
Speaker 1: that at all. He said. It's inevitable that it's going
Speaker 1: to jump to humans. Prove it. Prove it, he said.
Speaker 1: And when it does jump to humans, it's going to
Speaker 1: be twenty five to fifty percent case fatality rate. Prove it, Redfield,
Speaker 1: You've already lied us unto one pandemic and you're trying
Speaker 1: to do it the next. And then zero Hedge just yeah, sure,
Speaker 1: that's what it is. Yeah, just take it for whatever
Speaker 1: he says. Take this liar at his word. And there's
Speaker 1: absolutely no logical way that any of that could be true,
Speaker 1: none whatsoever. He doesn't know any of that. What is
Speaker 1: he some kind of a CDC nostrodamus or something predicts
Speaker 1: the future. And then they give you some more links
Speaker 1: to what they have covered, links to their previous articles.
Speaker 1: Gain of function may explain bird flu jump to cows
Speaker 1: and humans. Seriously, zero Hedge, bird flu has not jumped
Speaker 1: to cows and humans. The humans had pink eye. They
Speaker 1: work on a farm. They had pink eye, which they
Speaker 1: get all everybody gets all the time, especially in an
Speaker 1: environment like that. And they had no respiratory issues, they
Speaker 1: had no fever. They had pink eye and a PCR test.
Speaker 1: You know, the conservatives will not learn anything about the
Speaker 1: PCR test. They're just going to keep putting this out.
Speaker 1: Another article they got here, another one that zero edro
Speaker 1: the escalating threat of avian influenza and the ethical quandary
Speaker 1: of gain of function research to imply that this is
Speaker 1: coming from a lab, the same lie that they use
Speaker 1: for COVID. It is the bioweapon, the gain of function
Speaker 1: is the vaccine. Zero hedge, unbelievable bird flew a windfall
Speaker 1: for the largest industrial chicken producers. Now we're starting to
Speaker 1: get somewhere. This is children's health defense. But even they
Speaker 1: don't really push back against the narrative. But what we
Speaker 1: can see here is that it's a replay of the
Speaker 1: PPP thing all over again. Remember that we shut everybody down.
Speaker 1: We were told that only Walmart is essential. All the
Speaker 1: rest of you people shut your businesses down. And then
Speaker 1: to assuage the anger so that we didn't grab guillotines
Speaker 1: and come after Trump, right, which is what Bloomberg was
Speaker 1: always talking about. He said, Hey, we're going to take
Speaker 1: your jobs, and we're going to take everything from you.
Speaker 1: The smart ones of us. We just have to figure
Speaker 1: out how to keep you pacified so that you don't
Speaker 1: come after us with guillotines. That's what Bloomberg said when
Speaker 1: he was running for president. Amazing how candid these billionaires
Speaker 1: can be at times, isn't it. They just don't think
Speaker 1: that anybody or anyone will ever stop them, and they
Speaker 1: appear to be right. And so when we had this happen,
Speaker 1: when Trump shut us down and took our jobs and
Speaker 1: many people's businesses and livelihoods, he had to find a
Speaker 1: way to keep us from grabbing guillotines and coming after
Speaker 1: Now you know the fact that it was Trump and
Speaker 1: not Hillary Clinton. If it had been Hillary Clinton, there'd
Speaker 1: have been no way that they could have stopped people
Speaker 1: from grabbing guillotines and going after Hillary. But for Trump,
Speaker 1: it was already baked in that most of the people
Speaker 1: would just go along with whatever we had to say.
Speaker 1: And then you would have the people in like Info
Speaker 1: Wars and Alex telling everybody's forty chess, don't worry. I
Speaker 1: know it looks like a betrayal. I know it looks
Speaker 1: like he's working for the World Economic Forum, but he's not.
Speaker 1: He's actually just making them think that he is. And
Speaker 1: so what was a solution to that to keep us
Speaker 1: from coming out it was the form of universal basic income,
Speaker 1: which is what Bloomberg was talking about. And it was
Speaker 1: a PPP program, and as I pointed out, five percent
Speaker 1: of the companies, the big companies who were not supposed
Speaker 1: to get it. Was all supposed to be for small businesses, right,
Speaker 1: The PPP thing was supposed to be for the Payroll
Speaker 1: Protection Plan. It was supposed to be for small businesses.
Speaker 1: And then at the last minute, Trump and his cronies said, okay, well,
Speaker 1: small businesses defined as a business that has fewer than
Speaker 1: five hundred employees. But what we're going to do is
Speaker 1: we're going to change it so that it's you've got
Speaker 1: to have fewer than five hundred employees at a given location.
Speaker 1: So you know, you can have these changs. You can
Speaker 1: have chain hotels like Trump owned, and you know, any
Speaker 1: any large business as long as it doesn't have more
Speaker 1: than five hundred employees at one location, all those locations
Speaker 1: can get the PPP money. And guess what happened. Over
Speaker 1: fifty percent of the money went to five percent of
Speaker 1: the recipients, the biggest ones, and then you had small
Speaker 1: businesses that were getting many of them checks for less
Speaker 1: than one hundred dollars after Trump shut them down and
Speaker 1: called them non essential. And so the same thing is
Speaker 1: happening here. Bird flu is a windfall for the largest
Speaker 1: industrial chicken producers. The USDA provided over eight hundred and
Speaker 1: eighty nine million dollars and financial assistance to poultry farmers
Speaker 1: affected by bird flu, but over half of all the
Speaker 1: payments went to just ten percent of the largest industrial
Speaker 1: poultry corporations. Very much like PPP except a PPP. Over
Speaker 1: half of it went to five percent of the biggest recipients.
Speaker 1: Now with this, over fifty percent goes to ten percent
Speaker 1: the largest industrial poultry corporations. It's the same stuff, same stuff,
Speaker 1: over and over again. Whether it's Trump or whether it's Biden,
Speaker 1: it's the same thing. And Trump is going to bring
Speaker 1: this back through bird flu despite killing tens of millions
Speaker 1: of commercially raised birds in the last two years, the
Speaker 1: highly contagious disease, says Children's Health Defense, has spread to
Speaker 1: nearly three hundredairy herds from California to Michigan and infected
Speaker 1: at least twenty people on the last year. They're lying
Speaker 1: to you, I just told you why that's a lie.
Speaker 1: Pink eye is one of the most common affections. You
Speaker 1: get it where you get dirty hands and you rub
Speaker 1: your eyes. They didn't have respiratory illness, they didn't have fever.
Speaker 1: They had a PCR test and the same thing is
Speaker 1: true of the cows. And to push this line to
Speaker 1: say that it is highly contagious as now spread to
Speaker 1: dairy farms, this is an effort to shut down raw milk.
Speaker 1: So Children's Health Defense, which is RFK Junior's day. RFK
Speaker 1: Junior is supposed to be out there protecting raw milk.
Speaker 1: Do they not realize that the purpose of them focusing
Speaker 1: on dairy product and for them to take this genetic
Speaker 1: sequence that they have identified through a computer model. They
Speaker 1: haven't isolated anything. They never isolate anything. They've got a
Speaker 1: genetic sequence. They magnify anything that they test by one
Speaker 1: point one trillion times or more. Now they've actually gone up.
Speaker 1: That was what they were using during the original pandemic.
Speaker 1: But now they take this imagined genetic sequence and they
Speaker 1: test for it at a level where you can find
Speaker 1: anything anywhere. As Kerrie Mullis, the inventor set you amplified
Speaker 1: enough you can find anything anywhere. He says, it kind
Speaker 1: of makes you think about Buddhism where where all things
Speaker 1: are unified in one But the bottom line is that
Speaker 1: you amplified that that you'll find anything anywhere. And so
Speaker 1: they're testing milk. Why they're testing milk because they want
Speaker 1: to come after raw milk. Well, r K Junior says
Speaker 1: he wants to protect your right to raw milk. And
Speaker 1: yet Children's Health Defense is saying that, hey, we know
Speaker 1: that it has spread toairy herds, and it's spread to farmers,
Speaker 1: and we know that it hasn't it hasn't. See this
Speaker 1: is why I say, you don't know what's going to
Speaker 1: happen with this stuff. Well, yeah, we wanted to have
Speaker 1: raw milk, but look at this. We found so much
Speaker 1: with our PCR tests. We found so much of this
Speaker 1: imaginary virus that you can't have raw milk anymore. And
Speaker 1: everybody will say, well, that's it, you know, I mean,
Speaker 1: RFK Junior was a raw milk advocate, and if he
Speaker 1: says that it is dangerous, well then it's got to
Speaker 1: be dangerous. I hope that's not the way that it
Speaker 1: turns out. We'll have to see. Half of the payments
Speaker 1: have gone to only ten companies, only ten companies, and
Speaker 1: you know, some of them are getting so they play
Speaker 1: along with all this stuff and they shut it down.
Speaker 1: But they're going to be coming after individuals as well.
Speaker 1: We've already seen in the UK where they want you
Speaker 1: to register all of your birds, if they're backyard chickens,
Speaker 1: they want them all registered, and they are going to
Speaker 1: be coming around. They'll run the PCR tests and it's like, oh,
Speaker 1: I got my magic machine here says your birds are sick.
Speaker 1: Well they're not sick. Well, you're gonna have to kill
Speaker 1: them all. We'll kill them all. And now we look
Speaker 1: at this. This is a Texas farmer, very much a
Speaker 1: case like Peanut Squirrel. Texas farmer faces heavy prison term
Speaker 1: after armed agents raided her home over foign chicken eggs.
Speaker 1: This is actually worse than Peanut because they're not They
Speaker 1: killed her her pet chickens that she brought back from Vietnam.
Speaker 1: She brought them back as eggs. She thought they were
Speaker 1: very unusual. She liked unusual animals, exotic animals, so she
Speaker 1: saw these Vietnamese chickens and she wanted to bring them back.
Speaker 1: And she said, I went through customs leaving and customs
Speaker 1: when I was arriving, and I just reconciled myself to
Speaker 1: the fact that if they don't let me bring the
Speaker 1: eggs in, well that's it. But if they do, then
Speaker 1: I'm gonna, you know, raise some of these chickens. And
Speaker 1: she got through customs. She told her. They said, what
Speaker 1: are these? You said chicken eggs. Shouldn't say it, say
Speaker 1: Vietnamese chicken egg. But it was a chicken egg. She
Speaker 1: told them the truth. But other than you know, when
Speaker 1: you look at Peanut the squirrel, they killed peanut, they
Speaker 1: killed the raccoon, they killed her chickens. But now they
Speaker 1: want to put her in jail up to twenty years
Speaker 1: of bringing in an exotic animal. She said. Our local
Speaker 1: newspaper did a little article about it being kind of
Speaker 1: a ode side attraction, very unusual licking chickens. Show the
Speaker 1: pictures of that. Look at the feet. There's a close
Speaker 1: up of the feet. Further down. It looks like they
Speaker 1: got tumors all over them. It's kind of disgusting. Anyway,
Speaker 1: they show up with an armed raid and she said,
Speaker 1: I told the lady in Vietnam, she said, I'm taking
Speaker 1: these eggs to America. If they let me do it.
Speaker 1: She said, oh great, And so she did and now
Speaker 1: they're shutting down the whole thing. And that's what they're
Speaker 1: going to do to our individual farms as well. And
Speaker 1: of course we won't get any compensation. The big guys
Speaker 1: will play along with it, and they'll get paid off
Speaker 1: by the government for playing along with it. So this
Speaker 1: is from reason is America finally having this raw milk moment? Well,
Speaker 1: it remains to be seen because if you're going to
Speaker 1: support the idea that bird flew is there. And of
Speaker 1: course RFK Junior, after he did the expose of Fauci,
Speaker 1: his next book was to push the red herring of
Speaker 1: the hand lab and gain a function, and that is
Speaker 1: a red herring. The bio weapon was the vaccine, but
Speaker 1: he didn't stay on that. And again when you look
Speaker 1: at you know what was even when he talked about
Speaker 1: Fauci and his chapter on germ games, he went back
Speaker 1: to dark Winter. He said, look, the whole purpose of
Speaker 1: this is to tell everybody, you know, you got a pandemic.
Speaker 1: You shut everybody down. And the rush of vaccine to market.
Speaker 1: It was always vaccine. It's always targeted to the vaccine.
Speaker 1: And then he pivots over to the lab leak theory.
Speaker 1: So are we having a raw milk moment, and I
Speaker 1: don't know if we are not. I don't know if
Speaker 1: what we're going to see is a raw milk betrayal
Speaker 1: moment remains to be seen. The safety of raw milk,
Speaker 1: a conservative food favorite, is center stage. And Trump's make
Speaker 1: America healthy again, So we shall see what happens with that.
Speaker 1: I'm starting to get very doubtful about even that. Quite frankly.
Speaker 1: Matthew Ronson says, watched Trump part in the j six
Speaker 1: prisoners that he set up and left to rot, and
Speaker 1: his cultists will declare this proof of his greatness. That's right.
Speaker 1: Problem solution. Yeah, twelve June seventeen seventy six. Thank you
Speaker 1: very much for the tip. I appreciate that. He says,
Speaker 1: this DK truth bomb show should be sent to all
Speaker 1: American Zionists, pulpits and synagogues in America. Criminalizing thought and
Speaker 1: inquiry of a foreign government is war on our first
Speaker 1: on our first Amendment. Yeah, and on a constitution. It
Speaker 1: really is, it really is. M Sellers says, don't judge me,
Speaker 1: but I was at Whole Food yesterday and there was
Speaker 1: signs posted saying that they're experiencing food shortages. For organic
Speaker 1: dairy and eggs. Literally no eggs on the shelf. That's right, because,
Speaker 1: like I said, it's the free range chickens. Which again,
Speaker 1: if you stop and think about it, why would it
Speaker 1: be focused on the free range chickens rather than the
Speaker 1: chickens that are right on top of each other and
Speaker 1: never get out of that building. You would think that
Speaker 1: that would be a disease. But you know, I guess
Speaker 1: they're saying, well, they're out free range, they caught it
Speaker 1: and they brought it back to others. Still, this is
Speaker 1: all based on magnified PCR tests, and the big guys
Speaker 1: will go along with it. They'll let them kill millions
Speaker 1: of chickens. They get paid, they don't care. They're going
Speaker 1: to stay in business, and then the price of their
Speaker 1: maning eggs is going to go up. They're going to
Speaker 1: make out like bandits. It's going to be the people,
Speaker 1: especially the backyard chicken people, who are going to take
Speaker 1: it really hard because they're not going to help help
Speaker 1: them at all. Wayne Wonder, thank you very much for
Speaker 1: Tippy says, thank you Dave for the information inspiration. Get
Speaker 1: involved at the local level. Well, that's what we have
Speaker 1: to do, and we are you know, big money was
Speaker 1: here in our local election for Frank Nicely, and they
Speaker 1: put this stooge in that he's got a Republican label
Speaker 1: and he's got zero information about himself, zero information about
Speaker 1: what he wants to do, and all kinds of lies
Speaker 1: about Frank Nicely, Pictures of him photoshopped with him and crude.
Speaker 1: I mean, you could tell that it was photoshop. But
Speaker 1: you know, here's a picture of him and here's a
Speaker 1: picture of Biden, and it's like and it's because when
Speaker 1: you have this kind of money come in, and money
Speaker 1: was coming in from people associated with the Aspen Institute
Speaker 1: to push for this republican quote unquote republican who is
Speaker 1: going to push out somebody like Frank Nicely who has
Speaker 1: focused on real conservative issues. And there's also the smear
Speaker 1: campaign from Laura Lumer. She was involved in that as
Speaker 1: well against him. Oh he's anti Trump or something. He
Speaker 1: wasn't anti Trump. He's way more pro Trump than I am.
Speaker 1: Of course pretty much everybody is. But now he had
Speaker 1: a lot of nice things to say about Trump for
Speaker 1: all the good it did him. You know, it's like
Speaker 1: he was working with Massey on some of these regulations
Speaker 1: to allow people to raise their own food, and so
Speaker 1: you know they had to come after him. It really
Speaker 1: is true. I just want to say, because we've got
Speaker 1: a little bit of time left and I'm going to
Speaker 1: take a quick break and come back. But before I forget,
Speaker 1: I don't want to get to the very end of
Speaker 1: the program. So on a personal note, we have my
Speaker 1: daughter and her husband and baby who is now nine
Speaker 1: months old. I have come to see us for Thanksgiving,
Speaker 1: and so they're here already. I want to go ahead
Speaker 1: and still do the show today, but tomorrow and Wednesday,
Speaker 1: I'm real happy to report that Guard Goldsmith is going
Speaker 1: to do the show and he's got some great guests
Speaker 1: that are lined up with him. And then on Thursday, Thanksgiving,
Speaker 1: we will do a rebroadcast or our Thanksgiving show, and
Speaker 1: we'll have a best of interviews on Black Friday. And
Speaker 1: so we really do appreciate all of your support. This
Speaker 1: is the last broadcast that will be doing the month
Speaker 1: of December live here, so we really would appreciate your help.
Speaker 1: We've gotten up to the gas gage is now at
Speaker 1: eighty two percent, and so we haven't moved it up
Speaker 1: to the seven eighth mark, but it's right there at
Speaker 1: the seven eighth mark, so we almost made it. I
Speaker 1: think if I had taken off these next four days,
Speaker 1: I think we would have made it. But we really
Speaker 1: do appreciate your support, and I really do hope that
Speaker 1: you have a great Thanksgiving. But I'm not done yet.
Speaker 1: We've still got another fifteen minutes, so we're going to
Speaker 1: take a quick break and we'll be right back.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: Well, you know, earlier I pointed out that Marty McClary
Speaker 1: or whatever, the guy that's going to be the head
Speaker 1: of the FDA, had said that face masks were liberating.
Speaker 1: Are they really take a look at Taiwan, where ninety
Speaker 1: percent of the food sellers still wear face masks. This
Speaker 1: is doctor David Livermore, who writes for Daily skeptic Is
Speaker 1: that have spent the past few weeks in Taiwan, my
Speaker 1: wife's country. She needs to stay a while for family reasons,
Speaker 1: so he says, I rattle back and forth between two countries,
Speaker 1: he said, which brings me to risk to a foreign
Speaker 1: devil like me. Local attitudes are confusing. You can ride
Speaker 1: your motor scooter with a windmill clutching child on the
Speaker 1: footplate or with your dog hanging on to the motorcycle.
Speaker 1: You'll be fined for omitting the helmet in Taipei, but forgiven.
Speaker 1: In thai Nan. Two thirds of road desks involved motor scooters,
Speaker 1: and the test is famously simple, he said. Earthquakes are
Speaker 1: also viewed with similar a plom Taiwan straddles a ring
Speaker 1: of fire, and little shakes are to a penny. My
Speaker 1: wife recalls an expert boss who I'm sorry, expat expat
Speaker 1: boss who dived under his desk when the block shuddered mildly,
Speaker 1: providing entertainment and losing base with the Taiwanese who were there. Oh,
Speaker 1: you're afraid of earthquake, he said. Last spring we had
Speaker 1: a bigger one, five points something in Taipei and seven
Speaker 1: point eight at the epicenter. Afterwards, we found hairline cracks
Speaker 1: and plaster and bathroom tiles. I gloomily surveyed one snaking
Speaker 1: down a structural pillar, he said. Returning this autumn, I
Speaker 1: was relieved to find that it hadn't expanded or extended.
Speaker 1: Everywhere older than ten years has them, shrugged one of
Speaker 1: my friends, Eh, all the buildings are cracked up, you know,
Speaker 1: so he says, and yet these same Taiwanese who were
Speaker 1: so careless about, you know, throw other kids on the
Speaker 1: back of the motorcycle. We saw this when we were
Speaker 1: in China as well. I mean, you know, no helmets,
Speaker 1: no nothing, and got a kid hanging on the back.
Speaker 1: So the same Taiwanese who are cavalier about that and
Speaker 1: earthquakes cannot accommodate equilibrium with respiratory viruses on public transport.
Speaker 1: More than half remain masked, as are ninety percent of
Speaker 1: the staff at food outlets, from posh hotels to humble
Speaker 1: market eateries. I suggest this masking has become a sort
Speaker 1: of politeness, especially when handling food. Is it liberating or
Speaker 1: is it enslaving? He said. Most of these people were
Speaker 1: scared witless by government propaganda, and they remain so. The
Speaker 1: government said that once you caught COVID, your lungs would
Speaker 1: never fully recover, and I have to admit that better
Speaker 1: explains other bizarre phenomena that I daily encounter. For example,
Speaker 1: counting couples one mask and one knot, or folks who
Speaker 1: walk down the street wearing a mask then remove it
Speaker 1: inside a restaurant, parents who mask precious children, but not
Speaker 1: themselves on the chin and off the nose is frequent.
Speaker 1: Sometimes it's all quite nostalgic and least we have shed
Speaker 1: this nonsense. But one aspect not drawing comment is excess deaths.
Speaker 1: Not everyone in the Dooman Disaster TV news channel that
Speaker 1: my mother in law favors. He said. Stabbings and robberies
Speaker 1: feature prominently, along with food poisoning outbreaks, but not the
Speaker 1: fact that twenty percent more people are dying monthly than
Speaker 1: before the pandemic. This is far greater than in Europe
Speaker 1: or the US, but it is typical of Southeast Southeast
Speaker 1: Asian countries that were lauded for having had good pandemic,
Speaker 1: and Singapore, the monthly excess sometimes touches forty percent. Forty
Speaker 1: percent more people are dying from this bio weapon years on,
Speaker 1: and that's what we see over and over again. I
Speaker 1: see in Idaho man who's paralyzed ten days after getting
Speaker 1: the Johnson and Johnson COVID jab and he's trying to
Speaker 1: get compensation from it, but not going to happen, he said.
Speaker 1: We contacted Johnson and Johnson. They're very much aware of
Speaker 1: what happened to Doug, but they have dropped him like
Speaker 1: a hot rock. I remember when they first rolled out
Speaker 1: that Johnson and Johnson vacazine. I remember reporting on it.
Speaker 1: You had four different locations, four different states. You had
Speaker 1: four people get the JAB and immediately passed out and
Speaker 1: they had blood clots, and you remember how what happened next.
Speaker 1: Fauci said, Okay, well we're going to take a look
Speaker 1: at this, and I thought, well that's different. They waited
Speaker 1: a week, and then they came back with some lying statistics.
Speaker 1: They said, well, we've given it to six million people.
Speaker 1: We've only had six people who've died of blood clots
Speaker 1: or something like that, so it's safe one in a million.
Speaker 1: It's rare, rare, it's rare. Don't worry about it. Forget
Speaker 1: about it. And that was a lie because we knew
Speaker 1: that that six people had adverse effects, didn't die from it.
Speaker 1: Six people had adverse effects. We knew from looking in bears,
Speaker 1: because I'd already reported it that over eight hundred people
Speaker 1: had had blood clot issues from the Johnson and Johnson thing.
Speaker 1: They had already had eight hundred, and they said, oh,
Speaker 1: it's only six and it's just women, by the way,
Speaker 1: So they lie about everything. This guy's injuries have resulted
Speaker 1: in two million dollars in medical expenses, and his paralysis
Speaker 1: has cost them roughly one hundred and seventeen thousand dollars.
Speaker 1: One hundred and seventy thousand dollars plus he lost the
Speaker 1: job that he took the jab to keep Big BRIT's.
Speaker 1: Big Britt is back again, says I wonder if Dave
Speaker 1: has ever met Laura Looney. Yeah, briefly, never interviewed her.
Speaker 1: I met a lot of people that Alex straight through there,
Speaker 1: but I didn't interview him. Don't frag me, bro, Thank
Speaker 1: you for the tip. Please do your best to get
Speaker 1: Joel Salathan on to discuss non industrial farming. Yes, the
Speaker 1: second time. Maybe you brought us up. Somebody else did.
Speaker 1: I looked him up, looked good, Happy holiday break. Write
Speaker 1: that down, Karen, Well, thank you for sharing truth and
Speaker 1: being an alternative mainstream media lines. Well, thank you, Trump
Speaker 1: Burger forever being Pappy Night comes first, David, That's right,
Speaker 1: that's the that's the joke we have. We saw these
Speaker 1: cups that at one of the shops in Gatlinburg, Careen,
Speaker 1: I were just killing time, and it was this big
Speaker 1: wall of all of these nicknames for grandma and grandpa,
Speaker 1: and I thought, oh, I like Pappy. I think that's
Speaker 1: pretty cool. And I didn't think about it at the time.
Speaker 1: I thought about it later. That was Jim Rockford called
Speaker 1: his dad Pappy. So it's like, oh, that's good. If
Speaker 1: I can only learn how to do Rockford's we'll be
Speaker 1: an except I don't want to burn the tires. Random guy,
Speaker 1: thank you so much for the tip. I appreciate that
Speaker 1: says free range birds, eggs and raw milk. Money for
Speaker 1: your family. Thank you so much. I appreciate that. Milutin
Speaker 1: Milankovich said, enjoy the vacation, David, well earned. Well, thank you.
Speaker 1: I'm looking really looking forward to it. Let me just
Speaker 1: say in the time that I've got left. Eric Schmidt
Speaker 1: has spent the last few years early in the Pentagon
Speaker 1: becoming an arms merchant. But he's also co authored two
Speaker 1: books with Henry Kissinger, and this is one of them,
Speaker 1: and then there's another one coming out, This is the
Speaker 1: Age of AI and Our Human Future, which hopefully I'll
Speaker 1: be able to read during the break. Henry Kissinger, Eric
Speaker 1: Schmitt and a third person. And then he also co
Speaker 1: authored with a Microsoft former executive and they said it
Speaker 1: was Henry Kissinger wanted this to be his last things
Speaker 1: called Genesis. It's about Ai. Eric Schmidt said, as dangerous
Speaker 1: as the weapons are, he said, the biggest danger is
Speaker 1: that it's going to take over your life. Now this
Speaker 1: is from the at all times, as from last week.
Speaker 1: This woman who said I took a decision holiday, a
Speaker 1: decision holiday, and I put AI in charge of my life.
Speaker 1: I don't think this is going to be the last
Speaker 1: time that we're going to see something like this. So
Speaker 1: for one week, it told me what to eat, what
Speaker 1: to wear, what to do with my kids. It chose
Speaker 1: my haircut, what color to paint my office. It told
Speaker 1: my husband that it was okay to go golfing, and
Speaker 1: a lovey dovey text that he immediately knew I had
Speaker 1: not written this is It's absolutely crazy. But this is
Speaker 1: the kind of total control and how people will project
Speaker 1: human qualities on this kind of stuff. And she's a
Speaker 1: great example of this. So I've said before when I
Speaker 1: talked about all different religions. You know, you've got some
Speaker 1: professing Christians who put up an Ai Jesus. But you've
Speaker 1: also and I showed you the picture of the Buddhist
Speaker 1: Ai that there and they were all bowing to it
Speaker 1: and everything. He loaded them up with a lot of
Speaker 1: teachings from the Bible or from Confucius or whatever. And
Speaker 1: now these things are being worshiped and people are going
Speaker 1: to turn their lives over to this stuff. And that's
Speaker 1: what Eric Schmidt was talking about. He said, the normal
Speaker 1: people are not ready for what's coming, and they're going
Speaker 1: to be suckered in by this thing that appears to
Speaker 1: be human, but it's actually a lying deception. It's actually
Speaker 1: something that is copying reality, and that in that sense
Speaker 1: enough it is demonic. But I think it's even beyond that.
Speaker 1: She said, my daughters were enchanted by the disembodied voice
Speaker 1: that had infinite patience for their questions. They decided should
Speaker 1: have an aim, so we called it Spark. And there
Speaker 1: was a little bit of common sense injected here by
Speaker 1: somebody who did research into technology. So she didn't think
Speaker 1: using AI was much better than flipping a coin or
Speaker 1: throwing dice, even if these chatbots do have the world's
Speaker 1: wisdom supposedly baked inside. She said, you have no idea
Speaker 1: what the source is. At some point, there is a
Speaker 1: human source for the ideas that are there, but it's
Speaker 1: all been turned into chum. I think that's a good example.
Speaker 1: It's very much like the securitized mortgage instruments. You know,
Speaker 1: you just put all these mortgages in and then you
Speaker 1: put hit the blender button, you know, chum it all up.
Speaker 1: And that's basically what AI is doing. That's why it
Speaker 1: seems like it's hallucinating, because it just throws this stuff
Speaker 1: back at you. She said, each of my but then
Speaker 1: she immediately goes into each of my AI companions had
Speaker 1: slightly different personality. They didn't. She immediately reverts back to
Speaker 1: this anthropomorphism in the same way a lot of these
Speaker 1: other people reverted into a you know, a theomorphism, you know,
Speaker 1: God shape. You know, we're going to project God onto
Speaker 1: these rope And interestingly enough, one of these programs is
Speaker 1: called Anthropic that puts this stuff together. Nicole Kidman, So
Speaker 1: she wakes up crying and gasping, Not like Laala, who
Speaker 1: said have a billion dollars? Am I not winning this thing? Now?
Speaker 1: She wakes up, Nicole Kidman says, she wakes up crying
Speaker 1: and gasping because of her age. She's now entered her
Speaker 1: mid fifties and she's starting to think about mortality, well,
Speaker 1: you know, you don't have to be old to die
Speaker 1: any None of us are promised tomorrow. And that's one
Speaker 1: of the saddest things about this is that she is
Speaker 1: not connecting with anything that could give her eternal life.
Speaker 1: And that's what people are going to be looking for
Speaker 1: in artificial intelligence. They not even enough to think that
Speaker 1: they're going to merge these machines and live forever. That's
Speaker 1: a lie that's being sold to them by the guy
Speaker 1: who now controls a Trump White House. He wants us
Speaker 1: well have a good thing. Thank giving, Thank you for
Speaker 1: listening the common man. They created common Core and dumbed
Speaker 1: down our children. They created common past, track and control
Speaker 1: us their commons project to make sure the commoners own
Speaker 1: nothing and the communist future. They see the common man
Speaker 1: as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth
Speaker 1: and dignity created in the image of God. That is
Speaker 1: what we have in common. That is what they want
Speaker 1: to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
Speaker 1: They desire to know everything about us, while they hide
Speaker 1: everything from us. It's time to turn that around and
Speaker 1: expose what they want to. Please share the information and
Speaker 1: links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you
Speaker 1: for listening, thank you for sharing. If you can't support
Speaker 1: us financially, please keep us in your prayers. D Davidnightshow
Speaker 1: dot com