Speaker 1: More answer course is after Jerme COURSI and today it
Speaker 1: is Monday. It's August eighteenth, twenty twenty five. Thanks for
Speaker 1: joining us in coursenation dot com. You can see us
Speaker 1: on x at Corsi Jerome one, Jerome Course, PhD dot
Speaker 1: substack dot com. What we're seeing here is I want
Speaker 1: to start off with a something that Donald Trump posted
Speaker 1: yesterday on Truth Social. And this is really pretty important
Speaker 1: in terms of as you know, in God's Five Stones
Speaker 1: dot com, Crystal Show on God's Five Stones in a minute,
Speaker 1: we've been doing voter integrity. We were also expanding it
Speaker 1: to go into the Act Blue investigation. I'll cover more
Speaker 1: than that today in a few minutes. But Trump posted
Speaker 1: yesterday on truth Social a long, a long post on
Speaker 1: a mail in ballots and on the election is which
Speaker 1: essentially lines up with what we've been saying. Trump is
Speaker 1: going to do ordering a new executive order. He's telegraphing
Speaker 1: here there will be an executive order signed to bring
Speaker 1: honesty to the midterm elections. Now. Trump said, I'm going
Speaker 1: to lead a movement to get rid of mail in ballots.
Speaker 1: Get rid of mail in ballots. And also while they're
Speaker 1: added highly inaccurate, very expensive and seriously controversial voting machines,
Speaker 1: which costs ten times more than accurate and sophisticated watermark paper,
Speaker 1: which is faster and leaves no doubt at the end
Speaker 1: of the evening as to who won or lost the election. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's a very important statement because right away he's saying
Speaker 1: that we're going to eliminate the major cause of fraud
Speaker 1: the Democrats have used and architectured for decades order to
Speaker 1: steal elections. And make no doubt about it, the Democrats
Speaker 1: are stealing elections. I think as many as if we
Speaker 1: get fair elections, I think as many as half the
Speaker 1: people who are in Congress as a republic as Democrats,
Speaker 1: half in the House, and half of the Senate may
Speaker 1: be gone. I think there's that much cheating. Okay, so
Speaker 1: what I'm gonna read. It's a little bit long, but
Speaker 1: I'm gonna read the entire thing. I'm going to break
Speaker 1: it up in comment on it. But so, okay, See,
Speaker 1: we are now the only country in the world that
Speaker 1: uses mail in voting. All the others gave it up
Speaker 1: because of the massive voter fraud encountered. We will begin
Speaker 1: this effort which will be strongly opposed by Democrats because
Speaker 1: they cheat it level was never seen before. By signing
Speaker 1: an executive order to help bring honesty to the two
Speaker 1: thousand and twenty six midterm elections. Okay, now that's an
Speaker 1: important statement. Trump is saying he's going to sign a
Speaker 1: new elect executive order, which we've been predicting. Remember the States,
Speaker 1: he continues here. Remember the States are merely an agent
Speaker 1: for the federal government in counting and tabulating the votes.
Speaker 1: They must do with The federal government is represented by
Speaker 1: the President of the United States. Tells them for the
Speaker 1: good of our country to do with their horrible, radical
Speaker 1: leftist policies like open borders, men playing in women's sports,
Speaker 1: transgender and woke for everyone, and so much more. Democrats
Speaker 1: are virtually unelectable without using that's completely disproven mail in scam.
Speaker 1: Elections can never be honest with mail in ballots voting,
Speaker 1: and everybody in particular the Democrats know this. I and
Speaker 1: the Republican Party will fight like hell to bring honesty
Speaker 1: and integrity back to our elections. The mail in ballot
Speaker 1: hoax using voting machines that are completely total disaster must end. Okay,
Speaker 1: let's again, Trump is extremely strong on this. He's got
Speaker 1: a lot of capitalization, a lot of exclamation points in
Speaker 1: this eye, which again are emphasis. Trump continues, he's saying, remember,
Speaker 1: without fair and hon selections and strong and powerful borders,
Speaker 1: have even a semblance of a country. Thank you for
Speaker 1: your attention to this matter. Donald J. Trump, President of
Speaker 1: the United States of America. Okay, Now that's something we've
Speaker 1: been waiting for him to say. And with that tweet,
Speaker 1: I think it vindicates everything we've done in God's Five Stones.
Speaker 1: It shows that we have cracked the code on the
Speaker 1: cheating that has been done. There are algorithms of the
Speaker 1: state Board of Election records and we're going to have
Speaker 1: to do them all over again. We're going to have
Speaker 1: to quit using computers which allow for the creation of
Speaker 1: millions of false records people who do not exist. Yet
Speaker 1: they get legitimate state ideas and they can vote in
Speaker 1: mail and balanced schemes. Okay, this is an extremely important point,
Speaker 1: and President Trump is now beginning to move on it,
Speaker 1: and so I think we're seeing a major shift here
Speaker 1: in policy. Chris, I like you to come here and
Speaker 1: comment on this one because it's one I've worked on
Speaker 1: now for about almost three years. To get to this point.
Speaker 1: That'll be a huge victory. Once we get Donald Trump's
Speaker 1: new executive order.
Speaker 2: It's gonna be huge. I'm sure he can pull it off,
Speaker 2: so he'll have Congress's blessing. I'm pretty sure at this point,
Speaker 2: at least the slim majority. This is Look, this mail
Speaker 2: in balloting was abused, especially during the during the left's
Speaker 2: COVID rules to help bring in Joe Biden in twenty twenty.
Speaker 2: This is part of their legal cheating establishment. There are
Speaker 2: ways to look. Sonny Hosten was on a view herself
Speaker 2: saying she sent in her son's mail in ballot that,
Speaker 2: my friends, is election fraud in and of itself. Well
Speaker 2: he's okay, I all.
Speaker 1: Think it's cute and clever and smart and helping steal elections.
Speaker 1: Ha ha ha. You know, but it's a crime, and
Speaker 1: their federal felonies being committed by the Democrats left and right,
Speaker 1: and they're gonna have to be held accountable for them.
Speaker 2: It's a crime except for close eighty three, except for Democrats.
Speaker 1: Except for Democrats catch twenty two, except for Democrats. Okay,
Speaker 1: Democrats can cheat. Okay, you know, but again, because we
Speaker 1: caught this before the twenty twenty four election. The Democrats,
Speaker 1: who noticed, did not do what they did in twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: where they continued counting after the election night and then
Speaker 1: they had produced enough mail in ballots to swing the
Speaker 1: election to Biden and said it was legitimate. And they
Speaker 1: got away with it because the mainstream media supported and
Speaker 1: the court supported them. But I think now that Donald
Speaker 1: Trump won in twenty four twenty twenty four, they could
Speaker 1: not use the algorithms because we would have caught them.
Speaker 1: So at the end of election night they reported, and
Speaker 1: they reported for Trump. That was key. And with that,
Speaker 1: don you see a fundamental shift, which is now Donald
Speaker 1: Trump as president is going to change the election system
Speaker 1: as commander in chief under the premise that foreign nations
Speaker 1: have penetrated our elections and Telsea Gabbard has really said
Speaker 1: information with regards to China penetrating the computers during the
Speaker 1: twenty twenty election to change votes.
Speaker 2: Chris Oh, I think about it this way. I'm pretty
Speaker 2: sure the Democrats could have cheated to win twenty twenty four.
Speaker 2: They just didn't want to. That's another story for another day.
Speaker 1: But in fact that they would get caught, they would
Speaker 1: have gotten caught.
Speaker 2: Right, Look, just taking down one of their weapons is
Speaker 2: going to be huge.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it can be huge. And so I'm looking forward
Speaker 1: to a Donald Trump will probably issue that executive order
Speaker 1: in September to give us enough time a little more
Speaker 1: than a year, maybe a couple of months, maybe fourteen months,
Speaker 1: to make sure that the twenty twenty six midterm elections
Speaker 1: are legitimate, with voter IDs, with proof of citizenship. I
Speaker 1: think these are going to be things that will fundamentally
Speaker 1: change America. I put it back on the right track.
Speaker 2: It'll be bad news for the Democrats.
Speaker 1: Bad news for Democrats for sure. Number two, let's go
Speaker 1: to another story. Today is going to be the continuation
Speaker 1: of Fridays somewhere between Putin and Trump and Alaska. I
Speaker 1: think some fundamental issues got resolved in Alaska. I think
Speaker 1: number one, Trump and Putin have agreed that there will
Speaker 1: be some pullback in the territory by Russia in order
Speaker 1: to get an agreement. Russia does not want the you know,
Speaker 1: the part of Ukraine on the west that is favorable
Speaker 1: to the Germans. We're Nazi in World War Two. It
Speaker 1: is still neo Nazi today. So some territory can be
Speaker 1: easily given up. But the two provinces in the East,
Speaker 1: including Dunboss which which now Russia occupies, and Crimea. I
Speaker 1: think those are going to Russia. I think that Zelensky's
Speaker 1: going to have to accept he lost the war, Ukraine
Speaker 1: lost the war, and these territories which are Russian speaking
Speaker 1: are now going to come under Russian control. So that's
Speaker 1: part of it. I think a territorial agreement is number one.
Speaker 1: Number two, I think there will be some form of
Speaker 1: a European Union guarantee or short of joining NATO. They're
Speaker 1: not going to bring They're not going to bring Ukraine
Speaker 1: into NATO. Now, Zelenski over the weekend pulled a stunt.
Speaker 1: He started inviting the European nations to attend, and Trump
Speaker 1: went along with it. Now I think this was a
Speaker 1: mistake and that Trump should recognize that Zelenski is trying
Speaker 1: to act like he's the president of the United States.
Speaker 1: He's trying to set up and scuttle this summit that's
Speaker 1: coming up between Putin, Zolensky and Trump. So let's get
Speaker 1: it's kind of realize what Trump said to him in
Speaker 1: the old Office, you don't have the cards. Zelensky is
Speaker 1: lost in the battlefield. There's no way he's going to
Speaker 1: regain the territory short of a nuclear war, and we're
Speaker 1: not going to nuclear war over Ukraine. So we're in
Speaker 1: a situation right now where Zelensky's going to have to
Speaker 1: be told the facts of life. He's gonna have to
Speaker 1: accept them because he's not going to be given a
Speaker 1: chance to wreck another opportunity for peace. I think essentially,
Speaker 1: if Lensky wants to go this route, and the Europeans
Speaker 1: want to support Zelenski and say we're going to continue
Speaker 1: fighting with Russia, then Trump ought to say that's fine,
Speaker 1: do it, but no more aid, no more military support,
Speaker 1: and probably even pull out a NATO because this is
Speaker 1: it would be now at this point very provocative. If
Speaker 1: Trump and Putin have reached a fundamental agreement, Zelensky has
Speaker 1: no right to come in and scuttle it. And I
Speaker 1: think that's going to be the fundamental thing we're going
Speaker 1: to see play out in the next few days. Lensky's
Speaker 1: probably going to try. He's probably gonna try because again
Speaker 1: he doesn't want this grand compromise to settle the war.
Speaker 1: It will end all the flow of money and will
Speaker 1: expose his corruption. So Polensky may suffer very serious repercussions
Speaker 1: if the war does end. The Europeans are stuck. I
Speaker 1: want to I want to shift to another ground here
Speaker 1: on the that's relevant, but people don't take it into consideration,
Speaker 1: and that is the desperate situation that Europe is in. Okay,
Speaker 1: if we go to zero hedge, there's a very good
Speaker 1: article on what's happening in Europe in general. But the
Speaker 1: you know, the markets in Germany are already in recession
Speaker 1: and it's only going to get worse if we in
Speaker 1: fact have a continuation of this war. So if I
Speaker 1: can find the article here, Okay, there's one article standing
Speaker 1: in the way of a grand compromise on Ukraine. That
Speaker 1: it was an article that was written by Andrew k
Speaker 1: O r y b Ko and his sub stack. He's
Speaker 1: saying that some of the points that have to be
Speaker 1: agreed to are that Russi his goals are to militarize
Speaker 1: Ukraine and denocify it, to restore the country's constitutional neutrality,
Speaker 1: to obtain recognition of the on ground reality, namely that
Speaker 1: he's taken over these provinces which are Russian speaking. Putin
Speaker 1: suggests he become more flexible, more reasonable. For instance, he's
Speaker 1: willing to make some assurance that he's not going to
Speaker 1: take over all of Ukraine or he's not going to
Speaker 1: evade Western Europe, none of which I don't think he
Speaker 1: aspires to do either one. But the Putin is more
Speaker 1: flexible and more willing to compromise. I think he's gotten
Speaker 1: the message that Trump basically wants the conflict to end. Okay,
Speaker 1: So Putin's probably going to have to curtail the size
Speaker 1: of his armed forces after the conflict ends. He's going
Speaker 1: to try to criminalize the glorification of World War two
Speaker 1: era Ukrainian Nazi collaborators and or rescind the anti Russian
Speaker 1: legislation I have them removed. The twenty nineteen constitutional amendment
Speaker 1: about seeking NATO membership, amend the constitution to more easily
Speaker 1: seed land without having to hold a successful all Ukrainian
Speaker 1: referendum on the issue. Okay. So Trump said that he'll
Speaker 1: basically call up NATO agreeing not to deploy troops to
Speaker 1: Ukraine and to curtail the arms exporting to it, also
Speaker 1: encouraging this going after anti corruption in Ukraine, which Trump
Speaker 1: desperately wants. Okay, So I would think that by the
Speaker 1: end of this week, we should be in a good
Speaker 1: position to assess that the war are the terms on
Speaker 1: which the war is going to come to an end.
Speaker 1: This war is going to end. Trump is determined to
Speaker 1: end it, and Zelensky's ready to end it. The only
Speaker 1: one standing in the way, I mean, Putin's ready to
Speaker 1: end it. The only one standing in the way is Lensky.
Speaker 1: And for Zilinsky to continue fighting this war, he's going
Speaker 1: to need money, he's going to need equipment and arms,
Speaker 1: and Trump is going to make sure he doesn't have them.
Speaker 1: So there's not going to be much alternative here except
Speaker 1: for Zelensky to accept the deal. I think that's the
Speaker 1: way that Trump has got to play it, and if
Speaker 1: he does play it that way, I think we have
Speaker 1: a very good chance of seeing the war successfully conclude.
Speaker 1: And that's certainly been my goal. Certainly, I think the
Speaker 1: goal of anybody who's rational here is is to see
Speaker 1: this war wind down. It has too much potential to
Speaker 1: go into a nuclear war unless some rationality is brought
Speaker 1: to the table, and I think Trump is determined to
Speaker 1: have these discussions beyond rational grounds, not on emotional grounds. Okay, fundamentally,
Speaker 1: today is going to be an historic day as we
Speaker 1: look towards what steps are going to be taken to
Speaker 1: effectuate a final peace solution here in Europe. Now, other
Speaker 1: issues with regards to Europe is that we're seeing in
Speaker 1: Germany in particular, already in a recession, and Germany is
Speaker 1: going to intensify that recession by its policies, which are
Speaker 1: to have a continued bloated bureaucracy as European Union bureaucracy
Speaker 1: is way out of line as is ours. Secondly, the
Speaker 1: Green New Deal. Now enough propagandizing has gone on that
Speaker 1: these populations believe in a Green New Deal in Europe
Speaker 1: and they continue to like the idea of net zero energy.
Speaker 1: But net zero energy is essentially going to cause these
Speaker 1: economies to collapse. The Kynesian economy had predominated since the
Speaker 1: nineteen sixties, and I can remember when I was in college,
Speaker 1: in a graduate school, John Maynard Keynes was all the rogue.
Speaker 1: It was all the everyone was learning Kynesian economics. Well,
Speaker 1: what Caines said basically was the recessions were because there
Speaker 1: was not enough consumer demand. So therefore the state's job
Speaker 1: was artificially create this demand, lower interests rates, printing credit,
Speaker 1: stimulating the economy with deficit spending. That was all Kynesian.
Speaker 1: But what it did in Europe and the United States
Speaker 1: was it created a mountain state debt. We did not
Speaker 1: have these huge debts until after the nineteen sixty Kynesianism,
Speaker 1: a huge bureaucracy, distorted financial markets, and declining productivity. These
Speaker 1: are economic facts. And this Green New Deal, which is
Speaker 1: a created a pseudo economy which was disguised as a
Speaker 1: green transformation, and it was sold to the public as
Speaker 1: a contribution to saving the planet. In fact, it was
Speaker 1: a monstrous corruption, a grotesque response to Europe's strategic energy dependency,
Speaker 1: which devours every larger portions of the economy each year
Speaker 1: just to keep its oversized subsidy machine running. This is
Speaker 1: from an article, a very good article by Thomas Colby,
Speaker 1: and I think he's exactly right in what we're seeing
Speaker 1: in Europe. In fact, Germany alone poured between ninety and
Speaker 1: one hundred billion euro in twenty twenty four alone into
Speaker 1: this green energy boondoggle. So the federal government provided a
Speaker 1: fifty eight billion euro while the European Investment Bank added
Speaker 1: eight point six billion in fresh loans, So the eused
Speaker 1: investment to nine point one billion, and he used innovation
Speaker 1: and environment funds another twenty billion. All of this flow
Speaker 1: of financing, it created a zombie economy because all these
Speaker 1: green new deals failed. As they failed, the money was
Speaker 1: lost and no one was charged with bankruptcy. So Germany's
Speaker 1: now in his third year of recession and it's seeing
Speaker 1: a collapsing economy with a increasing number of corporate bankruptcies.
Speaker 1: The government has added a half million public sector jobs
Speaker 1: in the last six years, well one point two million
Speaker 1: private sector jobs disappeared. All this, I think predicts a
Speaker 1: European crash of major proportion. I've been predicting this for
Speaker 1: quite a long time, and it has economic consequences for
Speaker 1: each one of us. If Europe collapses, we have a
Speaker 1: European general collapse. Which you're going to is that the
Speaker 1: economic markets around the world are going to collapse, and
Speaker 1: that's going to be a crisis. Donald Trump has seen
Speaker 1: it and he's trying to prevent it with this bill,
Speaker 1: which does increase spending for the time being. But the
Speaker 1: next thing, after Donald Trump gets the war settled, he's
Speaker 1: going to have to deal with economic reality. And the
Speaker 1: economic reality is going to have to deal with is
Speaker 1: that in fact, the world is floating in debt and
Speaker 1: our national deficit is now the national debt is now
Speaker 1: thirty seven thirty eight trillion dollars, way out of line
Speaker 1: and not sustainable. So therefore, Chris of you will show
Speaker 1: the book that people can get, which is this. I
Speaker 1: wrote a book how the common global crash will create
Speaker 1: an historic gold rush, and it's happening. Price of gold
Speaker 1: today is still very high. It's still over three thousand,
Speaker 1: three hundred dollars in ouce. Okay, so we take look
Speaker 1: at I'm just gonna make sure we get the most
Speaker 1: current price. It's how goal is right now three three
Speaker 1: hundred and sixty one dollars silver at thirty eight dollars
Speaker 1: and forty eight cents. If you take a look at
Speaker 1: Swiss America, you can see that we have here a
Speaker 1: lot of offerings which allow you to get by way
Speaker 1: and get the free book by calling Swiss America one
Speaker 1: eight hundred five, one nine sixty two sixty eight one
Speaker 1: eight hundred five one nine six two sixty eight write
Speaker 1: it down one eight hundred and five one nine six
Speaker 1: two sixty eight, and if you like to show, if
Speaker 1: you want to support us, do call Swiss America. For
Speaker 1: those who are established a relation. As a new customer
Speaker 1: Swiss America, you can get this Walking Liberty half dollar offer,
Speaker 1: which is up to two hundred and fifty of these
Speaker 1: coins Walking Liberty half dollars, which are very high in
Speaker 1: silver content ninety nine point nine percent silver, and Swiss
Speaker 1: America is offering as a lost leader. They basically the
Speaker 1: cost or the value of the coins and silvers about
Speaker 1: what you'll pay for them if you become a customer,
Speaker 1: so with America. And then I think you should realize
Speaker 1: that maybe buying gold is too expensive at three three
Speaker 1: hundred dollars an ounce. Of course, if you could listen
Speaker 1: to us, we were asking you to make these decisions
Speaker 1: when gold was about eighteen one hundred dollars an ounce. Okay,
Speaker 1: So this Walking Liberty half dollar gets you into silver,
Speaker 1: which is a lot less expensive than gold. And yet
Speaker 1: you can have some of your holdings in a currency
Speaker 1: and an actual coin that will increase in value where
Speaker 1: your dollars purchasing power is diminishing. Okay. So I want
Speaker 1: to cover a few more stories here today, Chris. There's
Speaker 1: this whole issue of the police, you know in DC
Speaker 1: now being under Trump's control as Trump is really militarized
Speaker 1: is d C. And so the left is saying, oh,
Speaker 1: he's really trying to repress blacks and this is unconstitutional.
Speaker 1: But yet they're bringing in protesters in buses, which I
Speaker 1: think we have some video of, right, Chris. I think
Speaker 1: Chris will cue it up here to this video.
Speaker 2: We're just pulling, pulling up from behind the scenes here.
Speaker 2: So yeah, so I'm gonna pull this over here. Just
Speaker 2: caught me off guard. I wanted to grab this up.
Speaker 2: What happened was I had to reload the video. It's
Speaker 2: what happens here when you're behind the scenes and trying
Speaker 2: to reload things. Anyway, here you go. This is what
Speaker 2: you're gonna find. Here are these protesters, and see these
Speaker 2: little two buses. There are a couple of many, but
Speaker 2: you'll have you know, you'll find videos on x and
Speaker 2: social media where these protesters are chanting blah blah black.
Speaker 2: It wasn't as riotous as a lot of other ones,
Speaker 2: but they did bring in people from outside DC for
Speaker 2: a DC protest. You can tell by these busses. Books
Speaker 2: was going into the school allegedly, and.
Speaker 1: There's just really not any These are kind of rest protests.
Speaker 1: He's a protest there. Yeah, I mean that you're really
Speaker 1: not getting real protesters here where they're being busted in.
Speaker 1: But again, the whole point here is that the left
Speaker 1: has had a plan that they were going to disrupt
Speaker 1: everything Trump is doing by having another set of twenty
Speaker 1: twenty riots across the country, Black lives matter and anti
Speaker 1: fought et cetera. And the reality of that is that
Speaker 1: Trump has now got provisions where he's ready to put
Speaker 1: the troops on the ground to be asked to call
Speaker 1: out the National Guard. But it is not going to
Speaker 1: be repeated twenty twenty. You're not going to have the
Speaker 1: cities burning and Trump not being able to do anything
Speaker 1: about it because people like General Kelly, who was his
Speaker 1: chief as staff for a while, or General Millie Terman
Speaker 1: of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said that they would
Speaker 1: not support the use of the Insurrection Act, or Trump
Speaker 1: didn't use the military to gain control of the cities
Speaker 1: and rioting. Well, that's not going to happen again. Trump
Speaker 1: is ready to go into the cities and DC is
Speaker 1: just the first indication of Trump saying, look, you want
Speaker 1: to play this game with rioting and all the rest
Speaker 1: and destroying our cities with crime. We're going to be
Speaker 1: encountering it by being willing to put in the military
Speaker 1: and being willing to take over these cities in order
Speaker 1: to prevent that from happening. So again, I think we've
Speaker 1: got a very very different Donald Trump in the White
Speaker 1: House than we did the first term, much more sophisticated
Speaker 1: understanding how the left plays, and I think that we're
Speaker 1: seeing increasing articles that the agenda of the left is
Speaker 1: so unpopular that unless the Democrats could cheat, they would
Speaker 1: they'll lose every elections.
Speaker 2: Any comments, Oh yeah, I wanted to play this for you.
Speaker 2: There's the CEO of one of these U I guess
Speaker 2: crowd crowd formation groups if you will. Both Crews on
Speaker 2: Demand said he was offered twenty million dollars to recruit
Speaker 2: demonstrators for the big anti Trump protests on Thursday. Here's
Speaker 2: what he said to News Nation.
Speaker 3: Have the organizers of the July seventeenth demonstrations approached you?
Speaker 2: Again, this is from about a month ago, this one,
Speaker 2: but it's still important to note.
Speaker 3: It's aligned with the organizers of the July seventeenth movement
Speaker 3: have approached us, and in fact we rejected an offered
Speaker 3: that probably is worth around twenty million dollars.
Speaker 1: Twenty million dollars.
Speaker 3: Correct, I mean this is a nationwide thing, right. It's
Speaker 3: not to say I would have made twenty million dollars personally,
Speaker 3: but the value of the contract would have been worth
Speaker 3: around that amount nationwide to organize huge demonstrations around the country.
Speaker 3: But personally, I just don't think it's a factor.
Speaker 2: So that's something else. It's it's to the point where
Speaker 2: people see through all this nowadays. Yes, I know these
Speaker 2: people enjoy themselves, they have their parties. You have the
Speaker 2: numbers here talking about uh, this one guy who scanned
Speaker 2: three hundred and eight eighteen mobile devices, small sample, but
Speaker 2: saying that ninety two percent of them were at last
Speaker 2: five DC protests. It's like something to do for these people.
Speaker 2: It's pure blind Trump hate and uh it's and a
Speaker 2: lot of these uh, a lot of these protests are
Speaker 2: funded by major billionaires. They have people bust in. It's
Speaker 2: it's an embarrassment and uh at this point it's almost
Speaker 2: like just a laughable entertainment for the rest of us.
Speaker 2: It's not even they're not even real anymore. It's all theater.
Speaker 1: Well, there's an article also that is all right now.
Speaker 1: Leading article on the Liberty Daily, which is coming from
Speaker 1: zero had about how this, you know, the the left
Speaker 1: is putting huge amounts of money and the zorn mon
Speaker 1: Islamic Marxists run for mayor, you know, and so Soros
Speaker 1: and others are pouring huge amounts of millions into his campaign. Okay,
Speaker 1: So how the Working Families Party, which is his party,
Speaker 1: is supposed to be grassroots, but it's not grassroots in
Speaker 1: fact that behind it there's a two billion tax example laundromatho.
Speaker 1: That's anything but local grassroots are honest. Okay. So here's
Speaker 1: something publicly posted by sam antar on X says easy answers,
Speaker 1: Zoran Mandannie is the product of grassroots washing syndicate of
Speaker 1: five oh one C three and five one C four
Speaker 1: entities funded by George Soros and Silicon Valley billionaires. He's
Speaker 1: their manufactured product. Okay. Another one by another post by
Speaker 1: John S. C. H A C H T E L Mam.
Speaker 1: Donnie is utterly repulsive in every way. He possesses every
Speaker 1: negative attribute attached to my generation. I simply do not
Speaker 1: understand why this manchild captures widespread appeal outside of the
Speaker 1: democratic socialist adult Disney crowd an absolute loser, and yet
Speaker 1: on Joe Rogan Mondannie is saying, I don't think we
Speaker 1: should have billionaires because there is so much money in
Speaker 1: a moment of such inequality. But he doesn't seem to
Speaker 1: mind all the money from the billionaires going into his campaign.
Speaker 1: It's the usual duplicity of the left. And again, I
Speaker 1: think people are seeing through it and Donald Trump these right.
Speaker 1: This past Sunday did not turn into nationwide protests all
Speaker 1: across the country. There weren't nationwide riots. The country is
Speaker 1: not upset at what Donald Trump is doing. Quite the contrary.
Speaker 1: I think the country welcomes fact that we're getting some
Speaker 1: responsible government. Chris Any comment on that, because I think
Speaker 1: that's another very important point.
Speaker 2: Well, it's funny because you know, they switched from the
Speaker 2: millionaires and the billionaires, and they just say, well, the
Speaker 2: billionaires are the ones causing all the problems, when we
Speaker 2: all know most of these people are multi millionaires, even
Speaker 2: the ones like Mam Doomi who claim to be poor.
Speaker 2: The guy comes from money. The guy lives in our
Speaker 2: rent control department coming from money. So not only are
Speaker 2: these billionaire or these millionaires and billionaires supporting him, to
Speaker 2: run for one reason or another. The secondly, he's ripping
Speaker 2: off the very people he claims to represent because he's
Speaker 2: living cheap while making or making a decent salary by
Speaker 2: the way, as an assembly person, and of course being
Speaker 2: born having a family filled with money. That the man
Speaker 2: is just the man is just one of those big phonies.
Speaker 2: I still believe socialism is more of an industry these days,
Speaker 2: where these people make a lot of money and get
Speaker 2: a lot of perks off of it. They keep pushing
Speaker 2: it because money just flows right into their pockets. For
Speaker 2: the same reason Bernie Sanders as a prime perpetrator of
Speaker 2: all this. Come on, three houses in enough.
Speaker 1: Right, Well again, it's you know, it's a way to
Speaker 1: get rich of your socialist.
Speaker 2: Right, It's a socialism industry.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a socialism industry. That's correct. Okay, a couple
Speaker 1: more stories. Central banks are buying gold and record numbers.
Speaker 1: Nine percent of central banks say they're not done accumulating gold.
Speaker 1: Nearly half planned to buy more again. This according to
Speaker 1: the World Gold Council's Council's latest Central Bank survey. And
Speaker 1: I think again what's happening is gold is becoming the
Speaker 1: world's most important reserve asset. I would not be a
Speaker 1: surprise to see Donald Trump embrace a cryptocurrency solution to
Speaker 1: take some of the liabilities off the federal government balance sheet.
Speaker 1: For instance, you could pay social security and XRP. I
Speaker 1: own XRP. It's a it's a method of trading in nationally.
Speaker 1: But also it's only trading at about three dollars a
Speaker 1: unit right now, could easily go to a thousand dollars
Speaker 1: a unit. So I think a younger, younger people getting
Speaker 1: the they're so security benefits would be just as happy
Speaker 1: to take them ultimately an XRP or have them appreciate
Speaker 1: an XRP rather than dollars. That would take that liability
Speaker 1: off the federal government balance sheet, and it would be
Speaker 1: an economic plus for everyone on the Gaza is continuing
Speaker 1: ntime now is continuing to clear Hamas out of the
Speaker 1: Gaza and is now more and more proposing relocation plans
Speaker 1: for the Palestinians outside of Gaza. He's saying now in
Speaker 1: South Sudan, Libya has also been willing to take Palestinians.
Speaker 1: So I think there's a move here right now to
Speaker 1: implement in the Middle East, Trump's an expansion of Trump's
Speaker 1: Abraham Accords and economic prosperity is going to be the
Speaker 1: way to the future to achieve world peace. I've been
Speaker 1: predicting that for some time. I think it's beginning to happen. Finally,
Speaker 1: we're doing a new emphasis on Act Blue. I did
Speaker 1: a large podcast on Sunday, and Chris, you'll have it
Speaker 1: soon to be able to post, and to be able
Speaker 1: to we may actually play it on Wednesday, the entire
Speaker 1: of the entire broadcast, because we're now tying in Act
Speaker 1: Blue to a scandal involving mortgages, which appears to be
Speaker 1: tied to money that the Democratic Party has harvested out
Speaker 1: of an open border in agreement with Honduras that was
Speaker 1: reached twenty fourteen, opening the border to millions of unaccompanied minors.
Speaker 1: And you see here on we're dealing with a redesign
Speaker 1: of God's five Stones to have it include Act Blue,
Speaker 1: as well as to include the other issues of the
Speaker 1: Obama cou Detah and stolen elections. So we're gonna have
Speaker 1: much more here. I've publishing much more in Act Blue,
Speaker 1: and I want to warn everyone the Democratic Party has
Speaker 1: been funding itself by opening the border and having child
Speaker 1: sex trade and the child organ harvesting be at the
Speaker 1: center of its fundraising activities throughout Act Blue. It's going
Speaker 1: to be a huge, huge scandal, and it's just beginning
Speaker 1: to develop. Okay, let's wrap up. But today it is
Speaker 1: on Monday, August eighteenth, twenty twenty five. And the end,
Speaker 1: God always wins. God's gonna win here too. And I
Speaker 1: think we see here a decided effort by Donald Trump
Speaker 1: to take hold of the Ukrainian war situation and bring
Speaker 1: it to an end, just as he's taking steps to
Speaker 1: allow Natanyahu to affect a solution which will make Israel
Speaker 1: more secure. If we can eliminate Hamas from Gaza, we
Speaker 1: can do things, roll back the hesbaland Lemanon. We've seriously
Speaker 1: economically and damaged Iran and I think halted its nuclear
Speaker 1: weapons program by the attack that Trump brilliantly launched on
Speaker 1: Iran with the B two bombers. Thank you for joining us.
Speaker 1: I encourage you, in the spirit of Second Chronicles seven fourteen,
Speaker 1: to get on your knees, pray, ask God to forgive
Speaker 1: us for letting the country get to this point of
Speaker 1: moral decay. Too many divorces, too many divorces by older marriages,
Speaker 1: women deciding that they are suddenly wanting to have a
Speaker 1: new experience after thirty or forty years of marriage or
Speaker 1: fifty years of marriage. This amount of abortions we've had,
Speaker 1: which are just incomprehensible since Roby weighed, and this whole
Speaker 1: woke agenda sexually mutilating children, these kind of abominations have
Speaker 1: got to stop. And I believe that the key Obama
Speaker 1: Nation figure black ossining Obama will be under criminal investigation.
Speaker 1: Whether or not he's ever indicted, we'll find out. This
Speaker 1: is doctor Drone Corsi on course nation dot com. Thank
Speaker 1: you for joining us. We'll be back tomorrow and every weekday.
Speaker 1: God bless