WEBVTT

1
00:00:02.160 --> 00:00:05.639
<v Speaker 1>We had no issue looking someone in the eye and saying,

2
00:00:05.679 --> 00:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>hold on a minute. We do these things really well.

3
00:00:10.000 --> 00:00:13.199
<v Speaker 1>But you tell me what on this list isn't important

4
00:00:13.199 --> 00:00:14.359
<v Speaker 1>for you, and we'll take it off.

5
00:00:19.559 --> 00:00:22.399
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Audible Ready Podcast, the show that

6
00:00:22.440 --> 00:00:26.239
<v Speaker 2>helps you and your teams sell more faster. We'll feature

7
00:00:26.280 --> 00:00:28.760
<v Speaker 2>sales leaders sharing their best insights on how to create

8
00:00:28.800 --> 00:00:31.920
<v Speaker 2>a sales engine that helps you fuel repeatable revenue growth.

9
00:00:32.240 --> 00:00:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Presented by the team at Force Management, a leader in

10
00:00:35.079 --> 00:00:37.640
<v Speaker 2>B to B sales effectiveness. Let's get started.

11
00:00:39.119 --> 00:00:41.759
<v Speaker 3>Hello and welcome to the Audible Ready Sales Podcast. I'm

12
00:00:41.840 --> 00:00:45.759
<v Speaker 3>Rachel Klett Miller. Today we are going to talk about

13
00:00:45.960 --> 00:00:50.039
<v Speaker 3>our fps, responding to them in a way that puts

14
00:00:50.079 --> 00:00:53.840
<v Speaker 3>you in a favorable position. Joining me today is our

15
00:00:53.880 --> 00:00:58.679
<v Speaker 3>own Brian Walsh. Hi, Brian, Hi, Rachel, how are you good? Good?

16
00:00:58.799 --> 00:01:00.200
<v Speaker 3>Happy to have you here today.

17
00:01:00.359 --> 00:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>It is always my pleasure. I love talking to you

18
00:01:03.280 --> 00:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>about this stuff.

19
00:01:04.400 --> 00:01:08.760
<v Speaker 3>Awesome and we've talked about it before. It's a big topic.

20
00:01:08.840 --> 00:01:12.760
<v Speaker 3>We could probably do a whole hour on this topic,

21
00:01:13.200 --> 00:01:17.560
<v Speaker 3>and we'll dive into some different nuances about the RFP today,

22
00:01:18.280 --> 00:01:22.719
<v Speaker 3>but really the first assumption is that if you're getting

23
00:01:22.719 --> 00:01:26.120
<v Speaker 3>an RFP, you're likely a little late to the party.

24
00:01:26.920 --> 00:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, I mean, and I think that's the traditional concern, right,

25
00:01:32.599 --> 00:01:34.359
<v Speaker 1>And as you and I have talked already a little

26
00:01:34.359 --> 00:01:38.879
<v Speaker 1>bit previous to today, the definition of an RFP has

27
00:01:38.879 --> 00:01:41.799
<v Speaker 1>probably changed in a way in that, you know, in

28
00:01:41.799 --> 00:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the old days, people would come to the table having

29
00:01:45.519 --> 00:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>some set of expertise internally, or maybe they've engaged a consultant,

30
00:01:50.159 --> 00:01:53.079
<v Speaker 1>or maybe they've already worked with a vendor and they've

31
00:01:53.120 --> 00:01:56.879
<v Speaker 1>written an RFP. There's so much more information out there

32
00:01:56.879 --> 00:02:00.879
<v Speaker 1>now that it's almost as if every time and interaction

33
00:02:01.000 --> 00:02:03.959
<v Speaker 1>starts with the customer coming to us with some interest.

34
00:02:04.159 --> 00:02:06.599
<v Speaker 1>You know, they've done some research on their own. So

35
00:02:06.719 --> 00:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>even that is like a verbal form of the RFP.

36
00:02:10.120 --> 00:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>And and what I think, And it just hit me

37
00:02:12.800 --> 00:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>as you as you said it, and I because I

38
00:02:14.599 --> 00:02:17.599
<v Speaker 1>agree with the assumption. But it's almost as if getting

39
00:02:17.599 --> 00:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>an RFP maybe we should be thinking of it as

40
00:02:20.560 --> 00:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>like an invitation to the party, okay, And it's like

41
00:02:24.599 --> 00:02:27.199
<v Speaker 1>the question now, is is this a party I want

42
00:02:27.199 --> 00:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to go to? And is it a party I want

43
00:02:30.000 --> 00:02:31.599
<v Speaker 1>to step in, take a look around and get the

44
00:02:31.599 --> 00:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>heck out of? Or is it a party I want

45
00:02:33.120 --> 00:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to go to and actually participate in. Maybe that's just

46
00:02:36.319 --> 00:02:38.719
<v Speaker 1>a little shift on the on the on the concept

47
00:02:39.000 --> 00:02:42.599
<v Speaker 1>because there are you know, three or four big things

48
00:02:42.639 --> 00:02:44.599
<v Speaker 1>that I got to understand. How did they get here?

49
00:02:44.840 --> 00:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Did they get here on their own or do they

50
00:02:46.680 --> 00:02:49.039
<v Speaker 1>are already have some help? Are they using the internet

51
00:02:49.039 --> 00:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and doing all their own research, whatever that might be.

52
00:02:51.360 --> 00:02:54.759
<v Speaker 1>And then for us, it's getting an understanding, you know,

53
00:02:54.759 --> 00:02:57.439
<v Speaker 1>if it's a written RFP or it's a verbal conversation,

54
00:02:57.680 --> 00:03:01.599
<v Speaker 1>just listening and or fully re to better understand what's

55
00:03:01.639 --> 00:03:05.759
<v Speaker 1>happening so that you can assess your position before you

56
00:03:05.879 --> 00:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>try to improve your position right and determine your response.

57
00:03:09.560 --> 00:03:11.719
<v Speaker 1>And I have to tell you, as I was thinking

58
00:03:11.719 --> 00:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>about it this morning before we got on the call,

59
00:03:14.080 --> 00:03:18.599
<v Speaker 1>I was reminded of some of the greatest strategists I

60
00:03:18.759 --> 00:03:21.199
<v Speaker 1>was lucky enough to work with. And I think about,

61
00:03:21.199 --> 00:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, just names, no one that's going to know,

62
00:03:22.840 --> 00:03:26.919
<v Speaker 1>but Dan On Nuskin, Becky Mitchell, and Tom Grohle, who

63
00:03:27.159 --> 00:03:29.759
<v Speaker 1>might be a recognizable name because Tom is the uncle

64
00:03:29.879 --> 00:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of rock and roll as Dave Grohl. But Tom Grohl

65
00:03:33.560 --> 00:03:35.639
<v Speaker 1>was one of my mentors. So those three names were

66
00:03:35.639 --> 00:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>mentors of mine. As a sales rep. And one of

67
00:03:38.840 --> 00:03:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the things all three of them had in common was

68
00:03:41.759 --> 00:03:45.639
<v Speaker 1>this ability to really assess our position and to include

69
00:03:45.639 --> 00:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a case like this where there's a live deal on

70
00:03:47.599 --> 00:03:50.159
<v Speaker 1>the table that we've been invited to participate in. And

71
00:03:50.199 --> 00:03:53.319
<v Speaker 1>for them, it was all about strategy first, not just

72
00:03:53.560 --> 00:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>oh we got something, let's go run to act. It

73
00:03:55.960 --> 00:04:00.159
<v Speaker 1>was about really assessing what is this thing that we've

74
00:04:00.199 --> 00:04:03.879
<v Speaker 1>been invited to all about, and how do we figure

75
00:04:03.879 --> 00:04:08.039
<v Speaker 1>out do we belong, how do we influence it before

76
00:04:08.039 --> 00:04:09.759
<v Speaker 1>we just run with some set of answers.

77
00:04:10.879 --> 00:04:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's a lot of great things that you've teed

78
00:04:14.680 --> 00:04:19.959
<v Speaker 3>up in those opening comments, and I was reminded of myself.

79
00:04:20.120 --> 00:04:22.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, if you think about when you call a

80
00:04:22.480 --> 00:04:26.920
<v Speaker 3>vendor looking for a solution, there's already been a lot

81
00:04:27.000 --> 00:04:29.360
<v Speaker 3>happening internally before you get to that point.

82
00:04:29.399 --> 00:04:31.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean you sit on that side of

83
00:04:31.879 --> 00:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the desk, you know.

84
00:04:32.639 --> 00:04:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's never the first move, right, right. So you

85
00:04:36.879 --> 00:04:42.120
<v Speaker 3>talked about strategy and really assessing your position. That's sort

86
00:04:42.120 --> 00:04:44.839
<v Speaker 3>of that internal work that needs to be done. But

87
00:04:44.879 --> 00:04:48.800
<v Speaker 3>then the question is how do you determine a great response?

88
00:04:48.879 --> 00:04:51.759
<v Speaker 3>Because that next step of what you do influenced by

89
00:04:51.800 --> 00:04:54.839
<v Speaker 3>the strategy is can really go a lot of different ways,

90
00:04:54.839 --> 00:04:56.920
<v Speaker 3>and you have to be strategic about that response.

91
00:04:57.240 --> 00:05:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so you know, I should probably the rest of

92
00:05:00.800 --> 00:05:03.439
<v Speaker 1>what I'm going to say in today's podcast with I

93
00:05:03.480 --> 00:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>am not the loan expert, right, I just want to

94
00:05:07.959 --> 00:05:10.319
<v Speaker 1>make sure because I'm afraid that somebody might hear someone

95
00:05:10.319 --> 00:05:12.079
<v Speaker 1>we want to say and they'll say things like well

96
00:05:12.120 --> 00:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>what about or yeah, that works in this situation. And

97
00:05:15.040 --> 00:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, as you said, we could talk about this

98
00:05:17.000 --> 00:05:19.319
<v Speaker 1>concept for an hour, but I do think there's a

99
00:05:19.360 --> 00:05:21.079
<v Speaker 1>couple of things you have to do. And I kind

100
00:05:21.120 --> 00:05:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of mentioned in a minute ago. When I look at

101
00:05:23.160 --> 00:05:26.040
<v Speaker 1>an invitation, because that's really what this is, I got

102
00:05:26.079 --> 00:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to ask myself, is this a party I'm even interested

103
00:05:29.240 --> 00:05:31.600
<v Speaker 1>in attending? And that should come from your knowledge of

104
00:05:31.639 --> 00:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the account in the political landscape in sidey the account,

105
00:05:34.759 --> 00:05:37.439
<v Speaker 1>the relationships you do have or don't have. It goes

106
00:05:37.480 --> 00:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>back to the concept of account strategy and planning. Have

107
00:05:40.560 --> 00:05:43.199
<v Speaker 1>we been working on this account to develop champions or

108
00:05:43.199 --> 00:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>at least coaches and those kinds of things, or is

109
00:05:46.040 --> 00:05:49.279
<v Speaker 1>this a cold opportunity for us. That's the first thing.

110
00:05:49.800 --> 00:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>And then inside of that, I think You've got to

111
00:05:51.720 --> 00:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>have a willingness. If you decide you're going to try

112
00:05:54.079 --> 00:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to participate, you have to have a willingness. Or maybe

113
00:05:57.680 --> 00:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a point of view that just says, listen, whether

114
00:06:01.439 --> 00:06:05.639
<v Speaker 1>this customer buys from us or not is not the

115
00:06:05.680 --> 00:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>first question to answer. The first question to answer is

116
00:06:09.920 --> 00:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>what does good really look like? Now I'm going to

117
00:06:12.399 --> 00:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>sound like a broken record because I talk about this

118
00:06:14.160 --> 00:06:17.319
<v Speaker 1>all the time, but my job is to help the

119
00:06:17.360 --> 00:06:20.759
<v Speaker 1>customer to find what good looks like so that we

120
00:06:20.800 --> 00:06:23.879
<v Speaker 1>can look at that from both sides of the desk,

121
00:06:24.319 --> 00:06:26.279
<v Speaker 1>and I can start to answer the question before the

122
00:06:26.279 --> 00:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>customer even does. Am I a good fit for that?

123
00:06:29.680 --> 00:06:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Because if I've really helped you think through what good

124
00:06:31.759 --> 00:06:33.639
<v Speaker 1>looks like and we've landed on what good looks like

125
00:06:33.680 --> 00:06:36.959
<v Speaker 1>for you and your organization, it then should become obvious

126
00:06:37.000 --> 00:06:40.319
<v Speaker 1>to me and my team are we a good potential

127
00:06:40.399 --> 00:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>fit for this set of outcomes and what it takes

128
00:06:43.160 --> 00:06:46.079
<v Speaker 1>to get to those outcomes? So I should be qualifying

129
00:06:46.120 --> 00:06:49.319
<v Speaker 1>this opportunity in that way first, before I start thinking

130
00:06:49.360 --> 00:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>about what can I compete against other offerings that it

131
00:06:52.279 --> 00:06:54.759
<v Speaker 1>might already be at the table. Take that out of

132
00:06:54.759 --> 00:06:56.759
<v Speaker 1>the equation. Because that clouds your vision. That gets you

133
00:06:56.839 --> 00:07:01.199
<v Speaker 1>focused on getting the win over the competition, versus defining

134
00:07:01.279 --> 00:07:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and anchoring tim catoism, which I love, right, anchoring the

135
00:07:05.759 --> 00:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>conversation and the problems we're trying to help you solve,

136
00:07:08.480 --> 00:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and more importantly, in my mind, the outcomes we're trying

137
00:07:10.800 --> 00:07:13.399
<v Speaker 1>to help you drive. I think it got to start there.

138
00:07:13.439 --> 00:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>You got to have the willingness, you know, to make

139
00:07:16.079 --> 00:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the customer earn your expertise a little bit when it

140
00:07:18.160 --> 00:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>comes to your product and your solutions, right because you know, well, kid,

141
00:07:22.360 --> 00:07:23.439
<v Speaker 1>you're going to say something, I think.

142
00:07:23.319 --> 00:07:26.399
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, No, no, I think your to your point.

143
00:07:26.399 --> 00:07:29.839
<v Speaker 3>It's about the outcomes, and they know where they want

144
00:07:29.879 --> 00:07:33.839
<v Speaker 3>to get to, and they think they have the solution requirements.

145
00:07:33.839 --> 00:07:35.639
<v Speaker 3>But it's kind of your job to trying to late

146
00:07:35.720 --> 00:07:37.800
<v Speaker 3>the truth there and make sure that that path is

147
00:07:37.839 --> 00:07:40.519
<v Speaker 3>really going to get them to the outcomes yeah they

148
00:07:40.519 --> 00:07:41.519
<v Speaker 3>want to achieve.

149
00:07:41.240 --> 00:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, because I think you know, it's the idea

150
00:07:45.160 --> 00:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that you if you can anchor the conversation in you know,

151
00:07:50.360 --> 00:07:52.399
<v Speaker 1>and we all have our own style. My style is

152
00:07:52.399 --> 00:07:54.879
<v Speaker 1>to try to help the customer realize that Look, you know,

153
00:07:54.920 --> 00:07:57.199
<v Speaker 1>you want me to talk about me and how we

154
00:07:57.560 --> 00:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>how we can address this RFP or this listen requires.

155
00:08:00.759 --> 00:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>The problem is I could talk about me for hours

156
00:08:03.079 --> 00:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>on end. I need enough context to make sure that

157
00:08:05.920 --> 00:08:08.759
<v Speaker 1>what I'm about to say about me actually aligned with

158
00:08:09.000 --> 00:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>where you're trying to go. So, I mean, I get it.

159
00:08:11.800 --> 00:08:14.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to honor the required capabilities you come to

160
00:08:14.120 --> 00:08:18.279
<v Speaker 1>the table with. But my first responsibility, I think, is

161
00:08:18.360 --> 00:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to get some things on the table that you may

162
00:08:22.800 --> 00:08:24.639
<v Speaker 1>not have thought about yet, or you may not have

163
00:08:24.680 --> 00:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>thought about fully yet, in order to expand the universe

164
00:08:28.639 --> 00:08:32.559
<v Speaker 1>of what's important for you to think about right before.

165
00:08:33.200 --> 00:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Because I think this is all about and this is

166
00:08:37.120 --> 00:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>my mindset I'm when I say this, I think this

167
00:08:39.159 --> 00:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>is all about the customer getting to a great outcome

168
00:08:42.240 --> 00:08:45.559
<v Speaker 1>and to your point about triangulating the truth. So I'm

169
00:08:45.559 --> 00:08:48.559
<v Speaker 1>not only trying to triangulate the truth about that what

170
00:08:48.759 --> 00:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>is really a great outcome and what's truly required to

171
00:08:51.240 --> 00:08:53.159
<v Speaker 1>get there and if you really thought about all of

172
00:08:53.200 --> 00:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>that and if you really thought about all of that

173
00:08:54.799 --> 00:08:57.320
<v Speaker 1>with depth. But the other thing I'm trying to do

174
00:08:57.879 --> 00:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>is I'm trying toqualify you, right. I mean, you're the

175
00:09:03.159 --> 00:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>one who invited me to this party. Do I want

176
00:09:06.000 --> 00:09:09.759
<v Speaker 1>to spend time with you. Are you worth spending time with?

177
00:09:10.000 --> 00:09:12.879
<v Speaker 1>And you know, because it's the old you know, A third,

178
00:09:12.919 --> 00:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a third, a third, even when the owner organization is

179
00:09:16.240 --> 00:09:18.919
<v Speaker 1>an RFP. In a way, I'm of the strong belief

180
00:09:18.960 --> 00:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that a third of the people involved in that RFP

181
00:09:21.480 --> 00:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>are the ones actually sponsoring it. They want to see

182
00:09:24.000 --> 00:09:26.039
<v Speaker 1>some change, they're going to put their names on it.

183
00:09:26.399 --> 00:09:28.559
<v Speaker 1>A third of the people, you know, they're all long

184
00:09:28.600 --> 00:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>for the ride, they'll, they'll, they'll, they're all in for

185
00:09:31.440 --> 00:09:33.039
<v Speaker 1>the change, but they're not going to put their name

186
00:09:33.039 --> 00:09:34.799
<v Speaker 1>on it. They don't want to own it. And then

187
00:09:34.840 --> 00:09:36.399
<v Speaker 1>there's a third of the people who are praying to

188
00:09:36.440 --> 00:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>God this thing doesn't happen because it's going to change

189
00:09:38.840 --> 00:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>their life. They don't want it. Right. And my only

190
00:09:41.879 --> 00:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>point is I'm constantly trying to triangulate who am I

191
00:09:44.879 --> 00:09:46.679
<v Speaker 1>in front of? Am I talking to? Which one of

192
00:09:46.679 --> 00:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>those three people am I talking to? And if I

193
00:09:48.639 --> 00:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>find myself in that third person's office, I'm not suggesting

194
00:09:52.039 --> 00:09:54.639
<v Speaker 1>that that data point alone means I qualify me and

195
00:09:54.720 --> 00:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>my team out of the deal, but I probably does

196
00:09:57.480 --> 00:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>qualify me out of their office. Right, So all of

197
00:10:01.120 --> 00:10:03.759
<v Speaker 1>these data points matter but it does. I think I'll

198
00:10:03.759 --> 00:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>go back to first and foremost, you have to anchor

199
00:10:06.639 --> 00:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the conversation in what are you really trying to solve for?

200
00:10:11.000 --> 00:10:12.679
<v Speaker 1>Because if you can get that door open about what

201
00:10:12.679 --> 00:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>are the outcomes you're trying to achieve, it's easier to

202
00:10:15.000 --> 00:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>start talking through required capabilities at a deeper level. It's

203
00:10:18.240 --> 00:10:19.919
<v Speaker 1>also easier to pull them back and say, well, how

204
00:10:19.960 --> 00:10:21.799
<v Speaker 1>did we even get there? What problem are we trying

205
00:10:21.840 --> 00:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to solve for?

206
00:10:23.200 --> 00:10:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and focusing on the outcomes is a really easy

207
00:10:25.759 --> 00:10:28.960
<v Speaker 3>way to make a buyer focused the conversation hier focus.

208
00:10:29.320 --> 00:10:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And by focusing on the outcomes, it's another way

209
00:10:31.919 --> 00:10:34.919
<v Speaker 1>to qualify the person you're in front of. Technical buyer,

210
00:10:35.799 --> 00:10:41.080
<v Speaker 1>economic buyer, coach, potential champion, potential enemy, someone who cares,

211
00:10:41.279 --> 00:10:43.440
<v Speaker 1>someone who's on for the ride, someone who doesn't care.

212
00:10:43.759 --> 00:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, all of those things start to become a

213
00:10:46.039 --> 00:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit clearer so that you can then come back

214
00:10:49.120 --> 00:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and start to make some educated decisions, not on the

215
00:10:52.080 --> 00:10:56.039
<v Speaker 1>final outcome. Are we going to participate or not? But

216
00:10:56.159 --> 00:10:58.879
<v Speaker 1>what's our strategy to then go forward?

217
00:10:59.320 --> 00:11:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Right next? Your next steps?

218
00:11:01.320 --> 00:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

219
00:11:01.679 --> 00:11:06.039
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, As you're triangulating the truth and listening to them

220
00:11:06.240 --> 00:11:11.000
<v Speaker 3>talking about outcomes and solution requirements. The other thing you're

221
00:11:11.039 --> 00:11:13.840
<v Speaker 3>assessing is there a competitor already in there? Are we

222
00:11:13.919 --> 00:11:16.000
<v Speaker 3>behind as it relates to our competition?

223
00:11:16.559 --> 00:11:21.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? And as a result, again, it's another strategy moment.

224
00:11:21.480 --> 00:11:24.639
<v Speaker 1>What's the competitive strategy we need to play into here?

225
00:11:24.960 --> 00:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Because if some competitors already got relationship and has already

226
00:11:29.279 --> 00:11:33.679
<v Speaker 1>built some differentiation into the conversation me trying to meet

227
00:11:33.720 --> 00:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>them directly on the battlefield is probably not going to

228
00:11:36.120 --> 00:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>be the best of ideas. I'm going to have to either,

229
00:11:38.879 --> 00:11:40.279
<v Speaker 1>and I think you got to have both of these

230
00:11:40.320 --> 00:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to make the strategy work. I'm gonna have to take

231
00:11:42.120 --> 00:11:44.799
<v Speaker 1>a step back and ask myself, is this a flanking

232
00:11:44.799 --> 00:11:47.759
<v Speaker 1>opportunity or a fragmenting opportunity? Can I flank the deal

233
00:11:47.799 --> 00:11:51.320
<v Speaker 1>with additional differentiation that I have that is important to

234
00:11:51.360 --> 00:11:53.879
<v Speaker 1>getting the outcomes? And even but that's only going to

235
00:11:53.919 --> 00:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>work if I've also got relationship, right, I've got some

236
00:11:56.720 --> 00:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>credibility in the account. And then secondarily, or do I

237
00:12:00.360 --> 00:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>fragment it? So I look at this large deal and go,

238
00:12:03.080 --> 00:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>this thing is set up seventy five percent of it

239
00:12:05.039 --> 00:12:07.799
<v Speaker 1>for the competition already, and that makes perfect sense. But

240
00:12:07.879 --> 00:12:10.039
<v Speaker 1>this twenty five percent over here, we do really well,

241
00:12:10.200 --> 00:12:12.159
<v Speaker 1>how do I maybe pull that piece of the deal out?

242
00:12:12.360 --> 00:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Like that's that's like a real serious competitive strategy conversation

243
00:12:16.919 --> 00:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that should be happening early if something's coming to us

244
00:12:20.000 --> 00:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and we can already tell other people are engaged. Here's

245
00:12:24.320 --> 00:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the other thing too, when you think about the people

246
00:12:26.879 --> 00:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>if you've got a third party involved, like a consultant,

247
00:12:30.639 --> 00:12:33.039
<v Speaker 1>which happened, which is happening more and more right in

248
00:12:33.080 --> 00:12:35.200
<v Speaker 1>certain industries. It's been happening in other industries for a

249
00:12:35.240 --> 00:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>long time. But if you've got a consultant in the room,

250
00:12:37.519 --> 00:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you've got to be start to ask yourself some questions

251
00:12:39.240 --> 00:12:42.080
<v Speaker 1>about that. What does that relationship mean to the customer?

252
00:12:42.080 --> 00:12:44.639
<v Speaker 1>How does that consultant get paid? Right? What is their

253
00:12:44.679 --> 00:12:49.279
<v Speaker 1>objective which is you know, often not totally aligned. Their

254
00:12:49.320 --> 00:12:52.279
<v Speaker 1>objective is to save money, right, because that's how they

255
00:12:52.279 --> 00:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>get paid. They get a percentage of cost savings and

256
00:12:55.039 --> 00:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>this and purchasing is aligned with that to one extent

257
00:12:58.320 --> 00:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>or another. And then the line of businesses does even

258
00:13:00.720 --> 00:13:03.639
<v Speaker 1>isn't even aware of that relationship. They've got a responsibility

259
00:13:03.639 --> 00:13:06.879
<v Speaker 1>to the customer base or to the patient or whatever marketplace,

260
00:13:06.919 --> 00:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, vertical market I'm in. So then you've got

261
00:13:09.000 --> 00:13:11.919
<v Speaker 1>to start to triangulate all of that. There's a lot

262
00:13:11.960 --> 00:13:14.519
<v Speaker 1>more than just oh you want these ten requirements. Let

263
00:13:14.559 --> 00:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>me tell you how we do it right?

264
00:13:17.000 --> 00:13:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Right, Because really this r an RFP verbal, however it

265
00:13:21.000 --> 00:13:25.279
<v Speaker 3>comes to you, is an opportunity and you have to

266
00:13:25.320 --> 00:13:28.960
<v Speaker 3>decide what you're going to do. Two of that those

267
00:13:29.039 --> 00:13:33.320
<v Speaker 3>key questions asking your customer what outcomes you're trying to drive?

268
00:13:33.519 --> 00:13:35.720
<v Speaker 3>How and then how are you going to ensure that

269
00:13:35.759 --> 00:13:40.480
<v Speaker 3>your requirements actually drive those? And you know you're sort

270
00:13:40.519 --> 00:13:44.840
<v Speaker 3>of circling around this other point with the RFP. That

271
00:13:44.960 --> 00:13:47.639
<v Speaker 3>can be a little bit of a dance that when

272
00:13:47.679 --> 00:13:51.240
<v Speaker 3>you decide this isn't for us and you need to

273
00:13:51.360 --> 00:13:55.200
<v Speaker 3>walk away, that is not always easy, especially if there's

274
00:13:55.200 --> 00:13:56.919
<v Speaker 3>an established relationship there.

275
00:13:57.279 --> 00:14:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so let's talk about the walking awayside, and then

276
00:14:01.360 --> 00:14:03.679
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about the what about going all inside? Right?

277
00:14:04.000 --> 00:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>So but on your on your question, the contents of

278
00:14:06.600 --> 00:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>atit and gratefully, I think this is really in and

279
00:14:09.759 --> 00:14:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of itself a really important skill set, right because we've

280
00:14:14.200 --> 00:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>all seen this go really bad, like I remember no

281
00:14:16.960 --> 00:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>names please, right, we'll protect protect the guilty but I

282
00:14:20.639 --> 00:14:25.519
<v Speaker 1>remember getting a phone call from a Fortune five one thousand,

283
00:14:25.639 --> 00:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I think for five hundred client, and it was the

284
00:14:28.879 --> 00:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>administrative aid for the CEO, and we had responded to

285
00:14:33.240 --> 00:14:36.879
<v Speaker 1>an RFP and midway through we got cut. So we

286
00:14:36.919 --> 00:14:40.039
<v Speaker 1>didn't we didn't walk away, but we got cut. But

287
00:14:40.120 --> 00:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>this is close. The rep shows, without any agreement from

288
00:14:45.279 --> 00:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>anybody else, the account executive on the on the account

289
00:14:48.279 --> 00:14:52.159
<v Speaker 1>chose to send the CEO a letter letting the CEO

290
00:14:52.320 --> 00:14:56.679
<v Speaker 1>know how awful his team was in no uncertaint terms.

291
00:14:56.840 --> 00:15:00.679
<v Speaker 1>And obviously I had no idea about it, nor did

292
00:15:00.679 --> 00:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>anyone else, but I'm the one who got the call

293
00:15:03.000 --> 00:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>from the CEO's office, and of course, of course, you know,

294
00:15:06.279 --> 00:15:11.679
<v Speaker 1>I immediately took responsibility and apologized, and he was happy that

295
00:15:11.720 --> 00:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I was willing to, you know, own it, and you know,

296
00:15:14.120 --> 00:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>we walked away having a good conversation. But you know,

297
00:15:17.320 --> 00:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a way to exit gracefully, you know. And whether

298
00:15:20.320 --> 00:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>it's midway through the RP when you think you're about

299
00:15:22.960 --> 00:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to lose, or it's early on and you're seeing yourself,

300
00:15:26.000 --> 00:15:28.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we belong in this one, as much

301
00:15:28.200 --> 00:15:30.519
<v Speaker 1>as we'd like to compete. If this was a brand

302
00:15:30.559 --> 00:15:33.799
<v Speaker 1>new opportunity. Maybe we could better influence it, but these

303
00:15:33.840 --> 00:15:36.519
<v Speaker 1>require capabilities are already set up for somebody else, et cetera,

304
00:15:36.559 --> 00:15:39.639
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. You have got to find a way to

305
00:15:39.759 --> 00:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>exit gracefully and live to fight another day. And again,

306
00:15:44.039 --> 00:15:46.759
<v Speaker 1>even that is a skill, and I think how you

307
00:15:46.840 --> 00:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>do that? Again? It goes back to strategy. It goes

308
00:15:50.159 --> 00:15:52.639
<v Speaker 1>back to In one account, we just might be able

309
00:15:52.679 --> 00:15:54.679
<v Speaker 1>to call somebody up and say, listen, Rachel, we've known

310
00:15:54.759 --> 00:15:57.879
<v Speaker 1>you a long time. The reality is we already know

311
00:15:58.000 --> 00:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that like you, and I may be so tight that

312
00:16:00.360 --> 00:16:03.039
<v Speaker 1>I can say Rachel's reality is this has clearly already

313
00:16:03.039 --> 00:16:06.679
<v Speaker 1>been written for ex competitor, and that's okay. If that's

314
00:16:06.879 --> 00:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>if that's where this is headed, those things happen, and

315
00:16:09.600 --> 00:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>if we can't influence it, let's just move on right.

316
00:16:13.320 --> 00:16:16.679
<v Speaker 1>In other cases, it might require a more formal response.

317
00:16:17.279 --> 00:16:19.279
<v Speaker 1>We used to do a lot of this kind of thing,

318
00:16:19.320 --> 00:16:21.919
<v Speaker 1>where we would look at an RFP and say, hey,

319
00:16:22.159 --> 00:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>if it had the following couple of outcomes in it

320
00:16:24.759 --> 00:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and or the following couple of required capabilities, we could

321
00:16:27.159 --> 00:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>potentially play. And so we would send a letter and

322
00:16:29.679 --> 00:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>just stay very very kindly, hey, based on your RP.

323
00:16:33.159 --> 00:16:35.399
<v Speaker 1>It looks like this is where you're headed. We believe

324
00:16:35.480 --> 00:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that there's some conversations around the following outcome and or

325
00:16:39.240 --> 00:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>required capabilities that need to be had. If you if

326
00:16:44.360 --> 00:16:46.799
<v Speaker 1>you'd like to have those, we are a potential player.

327
00:16:47.360 --> 00:16:50.679
<v Speaker 1>If not, that's okay, but we're probably we're not going

328
00:16:50.759 --> 00:16:52.519
<v Speaker 1>to play because we don't. You know, it just doesn't

329
00:16:52.559 --> 00:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>make sense. That's probably the wrong language, which you get

330
00:16:55.480 --> 00:16:58.159
<v Speaker 1>the point. And what I find interesting is you would

331
00:16:58.240 --> 00:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>immediately find some things out. Those conversations on one in

332
00:17:02.320 --> 00:17:05.279
<v Speaker 1>the spectrum or somewhere in the middle would immediately tell

333
00:17:05.319 --> 00:17:10.079
<v Speaker 1>you if your gut is correct. You might It wasn't

334
00:17:10.119 --> 00:17:13.799
<v Speaker 1>all the time, but more frequently than people might think.

335
00:17:14.240 --> 00:17:16.559
<v Speaker 1>We would get a response to the verbal conversation that

336
00:17:16.640 --> 00:17:19.079
<v Speaker 1>I just walked it through, or the written conversation I

337
00:17:19.079 --> 00:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>gave an example of that would say well, whoa, whoa, whoa,

338
00:17:21.279 --> 00:17:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Wait a minute, come on here, come in here and

339
00:17:23.160 --> 00:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about that stuff. Okay. Again, it didn't

340
00:17:27.039 --> 00:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>mean we were going to stay in the deal, but

341
00:17:29.599 --> 00:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>it did give us the opportunity to go in and

342
00:17:31.200 --> 00:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>try to influence and I better understand so that we

343
00:17:34.480 --> 00:17:37.039
<v Speaker 1>could look the cuts in the eye, often in that

344
00:17:37.160 --> 00:17:40.319
<v Speaker 1>very moment and say, okay, based on this conversation, we're

345
00:17:40.319 --> 00:17:43.279
<v Speaker 1>all in. Or based on this conversation, we're clearly not

346
00:17:43.319 --> 00:17:45.839
<v Speaker 1>the right fit. And by the way, here's what we

347
00:17:45.920 --> 00:17:48.359
<v Speaker 1>think you might want to do. You might want to

348
00:17:48.359 --> 00:17:54.839
<v Speaker 1>call these people like especially I'm laughing because especially, like

349
00:17:54.880 --> 00:17:58.079
<v Speaker 1>if this was already wound for one competitor, we didn't

350
00:17:58.119 --> 00:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>want to make it easy for the competition. We you know,

351
00:18:01.400 --> 00:18:03.319
<v Speaker 1>so if we knew somebody else who could make their

352
00:18:03.359 --> 00:18:07.079
<v Speaker 1>life difficult whether they win or not, and and like

353
00:18:07.160 --> 00:18:09.839
<v Speaker 1>an honest competitor for the you know, for the customer

354
00:18:09.920 --> 00:18:11.799
<v Speaker 1>to consider, we say, you know what you should do.

355
00:18:12.079 --> 00:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>You should call those folks over at because they're another

356
00:18:14.759 --> 00:18:16.799
<v Speaker 1>group that might be able to do this really really well,

357
00:18:17.359 --> 00:18:19.759
<v Speaker 1>you know that kind of thing. Again, I'm doing this

358
00:18:19.799 --> 00:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>with the customer's best interest in mine, but I'm also

359
00:18:22.799 --> 00:18:24.599
<v Speaker 1>trying to make life a little more difficult for one

360
00:18:24.599 --> 00:18:26.519
<v Speaker 1>of my competitors who's already made tried to make my

361
00:18:26.559 --> 00:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>life difficult by writing an RFP and then getting me

362
00:18:28.759 --> 00:18:31.119
<v Speaker 1>pulled in as a second or a third bit. So

363
00:18:31.839 --> 00:18:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you get my point, right, I mean, but this is

364
00:18:34.839 --> 00:18:41.200
<v Speaker 1>all about really good strategy and preparation. It's all about

365
00:18:41.519 --> 00:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>really think it's chess like this is thinking three four

366
00:18:45.039 --> 00:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>moves ahead, not just reacting to the move that the

367
00:18:48.400 --> 00:18:51.319
<v Speaker 1>other player just made on the board, right, you know.

368
00:18:51.400 --> 00:18:53.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean I'm not the greatest chess player, but I

369
00:18:53.200 --> 00:18:56.759
<v Speaker 1>understand that concept really well, and so I would my

370
00:18:56.880 --> 00:18:59.640
<v Speaker 1>biggest piece of advice on this would be when you

371
00:18:59.720 --> 00:19:02.799
<v Speaker 1>get something like this, stop for a minute and think

372
00:19:02.839 --> 00:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>about strategy before you just act.

373
00:19:08.000 --> 00:19:10.359
<v Speaker 3>Right before you reacts too.

374
00:19:10.519 --> 00:19:12.839
<v Speaker 1>And it's like, yeah, And this idea of exiting is

375
00:19:12.880 --> 00:19:15.759
<v Speaker 1>another example of that. Don't just exit with a knee

376
00:19:15.839 --> 00:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>jerk reaction. Exit in a way that sets you up

377
00:19:19.200 --> 00:19:21.640
<v Speaker 1>for other conversations in the future, sets you up with

378
00:19:21.680 --> 00:19:25.200
<v Speaker 1>some credibility, at least gets people at least set your

379
00:19:25.440 --> 00:19:27.640
<v Speaker 1>exit in a way where no one can say bad

380
00:19:27.759 --> 00:19:31.519
<v Speaker 1>things about you for exiting. How's that at a minimum? Right,

381
00:19:31.559 --> 00:19:32.759
<v Speaker 1>that's like the minimum?

382
00:19:34.119 --> 00:19:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I like I love that point, Brian. And I'm

383
00:19:37.519 --> 00:19:41.319
<v Speaker 3>also reminded of a vendor search. I guess you would say.

384
00:19:41.359 --> 00:19:44.960
<v Speaker 3>We had several years ago, and I had a relationship

385
00:19:45.000 --> 00:19:48.880
<v Speaker 3>with one of the options, and they qualified themselves out,

386
00:19:49.359 --> 00:19:51.759
<v Speaker 3>and they had had meetings with us, and they qualified

387
00:19:51.799 --> 00:19:54.319
<v Speaker 3>themselves out by an email. They sent me just a

388
00:19:54.359 --> 00:19:56.359
<v Speaker 3>blank an email. It's like, hey, I don't think this

389
00:19:56.400 --> 00:19:58.400
<v Speaker 3>is a good fit. And I already had an established

390
00:19:58.480 --> 00:20:01.319
<v Speaker 3>relationship with them, and I was taken aback by that.

391
00:20:01.759 --> 00:20:03.799
<v Speaker 3>And guess what you know, four years later, we're looking

392
00:20:03.839 --> 00:20:05.359
<v Speaker 3>for the same type of vendor and I did not

393
00:20:05.440 --> 00:20:05.920
<v Speaker 3>call them.

394
00:20:06.279 --> 00:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it's not it's what's you know, people don't

395
00:20:09.880 --> 00:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>remember what you said. They remember how you made them feel. Yeah,

396
00:20:13.279 --> 00:20:14.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, or you know, it's not what you say,

397
00:20:14.920 --> 00:20:17.799
<v Speaker 1>it's how you say it. Whatever, whatever, idiots and whatever,

398
00:20:18.039 --> 00:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>whatever you call those things, whatever that might be, it's

399
00:20:22.279 --> 00:20:25.079
<v Speaker 1>that's truth. It's it's how you do it. It's going

400
00:20:25.119 --> 00:20:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to matter, and it may open up the door to well, wait,

401
00:20:27.640 --> 00:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you mean we shouldn't date? What do you

402
00:20:31.000 --> 00:20:32.039
<v Speaker 1>mean you don't want to date me?

403
00:20:32.799 --> 00:20:33.039
<v Speaker 3>Right?

404
00:20:33.519 --> 00:20:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Right? Right?

405
00:20:35.079 --> 00:20:37.559
<v Speaker 3>So you mentioned you mentioned strategy, and I know that

406
00:20:37.599 --> 00:20:39.960
<v Speaker 3>we've covered this topic and some other error and some

407
00:20:40.079 --> 00:20:43.319
<v Speaker 3>other webinars and podcasts, but I wanted to talk about

408
00:20:43.319 --> 00:20:47.599
<v Speaker 3>it here too. Is you do have the opportunity if

409
00:20:47.640 --> 00:20:51.920
<v Speaker 3>you're strategic and you're doing the right account planning and

410
00:20:52.039 --> 00:20:55.039
<v Speaker 3>you have the right relationship to help the customer build

411
00:20:55.319 --> 00:20:58.480
<v Speaker 3>the RFP. Who would who wouldn't want to do that?

412
00:20:58.599 --> 00:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Right?

413
00:20:58.799 --> 00:21:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Being there so early? But I think the question is

414
00:21:01.440 --> 00:21:04.200
<v Speaker 3>always how, And you have some great thoughts on that.

415
00:21:04.319 --> 00:21:07.200
<v Speaker 3>I'd love you to talk through some tips to help

416
00:21:07.519 --> 00:21:09.720
<v Speaker 3>the sellers out there actually.

417
00:21:09.359 --> 00:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Try and do that. Yeah, I thinks, because I think

418
00:21:11.720 --> 00:21:14.039
<v Speaker 1>this is important first and foremost. You know, you got

419
00:21:14.039 --> 00:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>to look at the universe of your territory and be

420
00:21:16.519 --> 00:21:19.640
<v Speaker 1>honest with yourself about where are my opportunities long term?

421
00:21:19.839 --> 00:21:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Because you know there's pipeline there, there's ongoing deals that

422
00:21:22.680 --> 00:21:25.519
<v Speaker 1>you're working on. But then there are other accounts that

423
00:21:25.839 --> 00:21:29.319
<v Speaker 1>require a different lens. There are accounts that, because of

424
00:21:29.359 --> 00:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>their size or just how the company is built, they're

425
00:21:32.519 --> 00:21:35.319
<v Speaker 1>more formal, right, and you know RFP like so that

426
00:21:35.440 --> 00:21:39.279
<v Speaker 1>first thing, understand your territory makeup, and understand which accounts

427
00:21:39.279 --> 00:21:42.519
<v Speaker 1>are probably more apt to live in this world of

428
00:21:42.559 --> 00:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a more formal process, and then start thinking about forget

429
00:21:47.279 --> 00:21:49.839
<v Speaker 1>the deal level, forget the RFP level for a minute,

430
00:21:50.160 --> 00:21:53.400
<v Speaker 1>start thinking a level up at the account plan. Who

431
00:21:53.480 --> 00:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>are the people that once decisions start getting made that

432
00:21:56.200 --> 00:21:58.759
<v Speaker 1>are going to affect us. Who are the people inside

433
00:21:58.759 --> 00:22:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of that organization that are going to matter when it

434
00:22:01.720 --> 00:22:04.319
<v Speaker 1>comes to writing an RFP, putting an RFP together, that

435
00:22:04.400 --> 00:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing, and start creating what we used to call,

436
00:22:07.640 --> 00:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think is still often called a relationship strategy.

437
00:22:11.400 --> 00:22:13.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's funny when I use that word sometimes you'd

438
00:22:13.640 --> 00:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>be like, oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, I've got lots of

439
00:22:16.240 --> 00:22:19.400
<v Speaker 1>personal relationships in the account. I'm like time out. There's

440
00:22:19.519 --> 00:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>little R and there's big R. Like little R is

441
00:22:22.279 --> 00:22:25.319
<v Speaker 1>that right, we go to lunch, you take my phone

442
00:22:25.319 --> 00:22:27.920
<v Speaker 1>calls that kind of stuff. Big R is We're having

443
00:22:28.000 --> 00:22:32.599
<v Speaker 1>business conversations that are forward thinking, right, And they both matter.

444
00:22:32.640 --> 00:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm not suggesting one doesn't matter and the other does.

445
00:22:35.599 --> 00:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>They both matter. But when I talk about relationship strategies

446
00:22:39.000 --> 00:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>with people, I'm thinking about again strategy keyword, getting in

447
00:22:43.960 --> 00:22:47.039
<v Speaker 1>a room and really thinking about, especially if there's more

448
00:22:47.079 --> 00:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>than one of me calling on the account. Who are

449
00:22:50.000 --> 00:22:52.599
<v Speaker 1>all of these different players by name or by title

450
00:22:52.680 --> 00:22:54.759
<v Speaker 1>that we know we need to start building relationships with

451
00:22:55.599 --> 00:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>and how are we going to do that? Who inside

452
00:22:59.160 --> 00:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of our team is going to do that? How is

453
00:23:01.119 --> 00:23:03.319
<v Speaker 1>Rachel going to go after this person and the marketing

454
00:23:03.359 --> 00:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>team that we normally need access to, while Brian goes

455
00:23:05.519 --> 00:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to this person uh, and the people who typically own

456
00:23:08.279 --> 00:23:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the lines of business, somebody else is going into some

457
00:23:10.480 --> 00:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>technical parts of the business. How are we going to

458
00:23:13.039 --> 00:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>build those relationships over time so that there's some strategy

459
00:23:17.039 --> 00:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>against strategy and thought out execution to do that. Because

460
00:23:20.640 --> 00:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>if you live at the account level, it makes it

461
00:23:23.200 --> 00:23:25.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot easier to do the next thing, which is

462
00:23:25.400 --> 00:23:29.839
<v Speaker 1>to start getting them thinking about the issues that we

463
00:23:29.880 --> 00:23:34.079
<v Speaker 1>are most relevant to in their world before those issues

464
00:23:34.160 --> 00:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>either become big, big issues or before somebody else gets

465
00:23:38.279 --> 00:23:40.640
<v Speaker 1>in there and starts building an RFP at the product

466
00:23:40.720 --> 00:23:44.559
<v Speaker 1>level that we now have to respond to, right, And

467
00:23:44.799 --> 00:23:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, because what happens is another competitor's coming

468
00:23:47.960 --> 00:23:50.039
<v Speaker 1>in at the low level and they're trying, you know,

469
00:23:50.119 --> 00:23:54.279
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to product hide the conversation and basically get

470
00:23:54.319 --> 00:23:57.319
<v Speaker 1>somebody at the low level to spend twenty thousand or

471
00:23:57.359 --> 00:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>forty thousand dollars a budget to do a science experiment

472
00:24:00.039 --> 00:24:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and to hope that science experiment turns into some enterprise opportunity.

473
00:24:04.000 --> 00:24:07.079
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying that's a bad strategy depending on

474
00:24:07.119 --> 00:24:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the account, but again, that's a tactic that somebody else

475
00:24:10.519 --> 00:24:13.640
<v Speaker 1>might be using. And if you're not having if you're

476
00:24:13.640 --> 00:24:17.359
<v Speaker 1>not building these relationships and having these business conversations on

477
00:24:17.400 --> 00:24:20.119
<v Speaker 1>the front end. There's a good chance that that might happen.

478
00:24:20.680 --> 00:24:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Right now, all of a sudden, somebody's brought something from

479
00:24:22.720 --> 00:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of the organization up and people are starting

480
00:24:24.720 --> 00:24:27.079
<v Speaker 1>to look around, going, oh, that's interesting. What does that

481
00:24:27.119 --> 00:24:30.599
<v Speaker 1>thing do? What does it solve for? So before you

482
00:24:30.640 --> 00:24:33.839
<v Speaker 1>know it, you've gotten backdoored into an RFP. So that's

483
00:24:33.880 --> 00:24:36.519
<v Speaker 1>why I think this thing is so important. I think

484
00:24:36.559 --> 00:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the other thing you can do is I have found

485
00:24:39.960 --> 00:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>this very effective in the past is to have a

486
00:24:44.720 --> 00:24:47.519
<v Speaker 1>we used to call it internally, I think we used

487
00:24:47.519 --> 00:24:50.519
<v Speaker 1>to call it an RFP or a big influencer and

488
00:24:50.960 --> 00:24:53.599
<v Speaker 1>what it was. And again, this is like anything else.

489
00:24:54.119 --> 00:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>If you're not careful, people will see it in the

490
00:24:57.519 --> 00:25:00.680
<v Speaker 1>wrong way. But we had a document when we would

491
00:25:00.720 --> 00:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>do large managed services engagements for example and other large

492
00:25:04.799 --> 00:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>but there's just just one example where we could go

493
00:25:07.279 --> 00:25:09.839
<v Speaker 1>into an organization and we say, listen, we know you're

494
00:25:09.880 --> 00:25:13.319
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this topic. We understand you know why you

495
00:25:13.359 --> 00:25:15.359
<v Speaker 1>would be thinking about it for the business, and this

496
00:25:15.400 --> 00:25:18.319
<v Speaker 1>is where you're trying to go and this, for example,

497
00:25:18.440 --> 00:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>is the cost savings and the people impact on everything

498
00:25:21.240 --> 00:25:23.119
<v Speaker 1>that you can do for the business. It's all very

499
00:25:23.119 --> 00:25:26.559
<v Speaker 1>positive stuff. What we have found though, is the numbers

500
00:25:26.559 --> 00:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>associated with these projects are so big for the company,

501
00:25:31.279 --> 00:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>The outcomes are so big for you, whether you do

502
00:25:33.680 --> 00:25:36.039
<v Speaker 1>it with us or not, that that can start the

503
00:25:36.079 --> 00:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>cloud judgment and people can get so focused on the number,

504
00:25:40.160 --> 00:25:43.279
<v Speaker 1>the outcome, the cost savings and all of that stuff

505
00:25:43.640 --> 00:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>that people forget what it really needs to get to

506
00:25:47.319 --> 00:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that outcome and make sure that you not only get

507
00:25:50.039 --> 00:25:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to that outcome, but then it actually stays. It doesn't

508
00:25:53.240 --> 00:25:55.599
<v Speaker 1>revert back to the old way six months later because

509
00:25:55.640 --> 00:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you didn't do it right. So we'd like to give

510
00:25:58.000 --> 00:26:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you something. This is a two to three pager. These

511
00:26:01.400 --> 00:26:03.880
<v Speaker 1>are all of the things, and we would write it

512
00:26:03.920 --> 00:26:07.279
<v Speaker 1>in customer language, not product or future language. These are

513
00:26:07.319 --> 00:26:10.559
<v Speaker 1>all of the things that we know organizations need to

514
00:26:10.559 --> 00:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>think through so that they could come to the right

515
00:26:12.720 --> 00:26:16.920
<v Speaker 1>conclusion for themselves. Security was like, as an example, like,

516
00:26:16.960 --> 00:26:19.559
<v Speaker 1>if you don't think through security as it relates to

517
00:26:19.599 --> 00:26:22.319
<v Speaker 1>the following two or three or four bullets, there's a

518
00:26:22.359 --> 00:26:24.839
<v Speaker 1>good chance you're going to make a decision and something's

519
00:26:24.880 --> 00:26:26.759
<v Speaker 1>going to go wrong on the other side. I'm not

520
00:26:26.839 --> 00:26:29.359
<v Speaker 1>telling you what decision to make. What I'm suggesting to

521
00:26:29.400 --> 00:26:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you is these are the three or four security bullets

522
00:26:32.200 --> 00:26:34.799
<v Speaker 1>that you and your team better think through before you

523
00:26:34.839 --> 00:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>ask anybody to come in here with products and solutions.

524
00:26:38.319 --> 00:26:43.240
<v Speaker 1>It was obviously well written for us because of the

525
00:26:43.279 --> 00:26:47.720
<v Speaker 1>product and solution differentiation we had, but there was no

526
00:26:47.759 --> 00:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>one that could read it and say, oh, that's because

527
00:26:50.720 --> 00:26:53.079
<v Speaker 1>you do this and other people don't do it, or

528
00:26:53.720 --> 00:26:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that's not what it was. It was. This is stuff

529
00:26:56.200 --> 00:26:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that whether you buy from us or not, if you

530
00:26:58.400 --> 00:27:02.319
<v Speaker 1>don't think through good up, you're going to have revolts,

531
00:27:03.200 --> 00:27:05.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera as a result.

532
00:27:05.839 --> 00:27:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think I love that idea. And you know

533
00:27:09.960 --> 00:27:13.160
<v Speaker 3>you're really making the point Brian that it's while you're

534
00:27:13.160 --> 00:27:17.799
<v Speaker 3>going to sort of tee up your differentiation, it's vendor

535
00:27:17.839 --> 00:27:20.559
<v Speaker 3>and not agnostic. But I may say you're teeing up

536
00:27:20.559 --> 00:27:24.759
<v Speaker 3>your differentiation because it matters to the customer. The fact

537
00:27:24.799 --> 00:27:27.480
<v Speaker 3>that you do it this way will lead to better

538
00:27:27.519 --> 00:27:30.480
<v Speaker 3>outcomes of the customer. I mean, that's why you're selling

539
00:27:30.519 --> 00:27:34.400
<v Speaker 3>what you're selling. So making it in the outcomes of

540
00:27:34.440 --> 00:27:39.400
<v Speaker 3>the customer and almost vendor agnostic. Yeah, can really be beneficial.

541
00:27:39.519 --> 00:27:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. The worst thing that ever happened when we did

542
00:27:41.480 --> 00:27:45.759
<v Speaker 1>that was we had a couple of clients who and

543
00:27:46.079 --> 00:27:50.160
<v Speaker 1>as I remember, they were both more procurement driven. They

544
00:27:50.200 --> 00:27:52.799
<v Speaker 1>weren't lying a business type of folks. But you know,

545
00:27:52.839 --> 00:27:55.279
<v Speaker 1>they got a little upset because they'd look at it

546
00:27:55.319 --> 00:27:56.799
<v Speaker 1>and they'd start to dig it, and they'd say, to

547
00:27:56.839 --> 00:27:59.400
<v Speaker 1>your point, oh, I get it. This is all built

548
00:27:59.440 --> 00:28:01.759
<v Speaker 1>around you, guys, and your solutions and how much better

549
00:28:01.799 --> 00:28:05.519
<v Speaker 1>you are. And we had no issue looking someone in

550
00:28:05.559 --> 00:28:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the eye and saying, hold on a minute, we do

551
00:28:07.720 --> 00:28:11.720
<v Speaker 1>these things really well, but you tell me what on

552
00:28:11.759 --> 00:28:14.079
<v Speaker 1>this list isn't important for you, and we'll take it off.

553
00:28:14.480 --> 00:28:17.440
<v Speaker 1>That's not what this is about. This is about whether

554
00:28:17.480 --> 00:28:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you buy from us or not. What does it take

555
00:28:20.519 --> 00:28:23.119
<v Speaker 1>to get to a great outcome like we were. We

556
00:28:23.119 --> 00:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>were we were doing contracts that were very large and

557
00:28:28.000 --> 00:28:30.559
<v Speaker 1>five to seven years long, and we're going to have

558
00:28:30.559 --> 00:28:33.440
<v Speaker 1>an impact on a customer's business. That's that is fact.

559
00:28:33.759 --> 00:28:36.519
<v Speaker 1>And the numbers, not just the dollar valued us, but

560
00:28:36.559 --> 00:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the numbers to the customer were significant. And so we

561
00:28:39.759 --> 00:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>had no problem looking the customer and say, hey, this

562
00:28:42.920 --> 00:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is about whether or not you can you can cut

563
00:28:46.359 --> 00:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever your total revenue line is at the top, if

564
00:28:49.920 --> 00:28:53.799
<v Speaker 1>you can save somewhere between I don't know, one to

565
00:28:53.880 --> 00:28:56.359
<v Speaker 1>two percent of that. If you don't want to do that,

566
00:28:56.359 --> 00:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that's fine, But if you want to do that, this

567
00:29:00.559 --> 00:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>is what it takes to get to those kinds of

568
00:29:02.200 --> 00:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>outcomes and actually make it stick. So that's how to

569
00:29:05.960 --> 00:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>your point. It's yeah, I love how you just discuided.

570
00:29:08.799 --> 00:29:11.799
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to add that additional piece in because

571
00:29:12.359 --> 00:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's about you. If I'm the right fit,

572
00:29:15.279 --> 00:29:16.599
<v Speaker 1>that will be a natural outcome.

573
00:29:17.039 --> 00:29:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Exactly exactly. This is such a meati topic, Brian. Yeah,

574
00:29:21.519 --> 00:29:24.559
<v Speaker 3>we could do like a ten part series on it. Yeah,

575
00:29:24.839 --> 00:29:27.319
<v Speaker 3>I think I'm going to land the plane here. I

576
00:29:27.359 --> 00:29:30.680
<v Speaker 3>would love for you to wrap this up, kind of

577
00:29:30.799 --> 00:29:32.599
<v Speaker 3>give us a summary. I know that there are a

578
00:29:32.599 --> 00:29:35.000
<v Speaker 3>lot of people listening out there who are finding themselves

579
00:29:35.000 --> 00:29:37.599
<v Speaker 3>in this very situation right now. I'm sure they're going

580
00:29:37.640 --> 00:29:39.440
<v Speaker 3>to say, oh, let me go back and write that

581
00:29:39.519 --> 00:29:43.839
<v Speaker 3>down or backtrack this podcast. But if you could just

582
00:29:44.079 --> 00:29:46.799
<v Speaker 3>kind of wrap up your key points as it relates

583
00:29:46.880 --> 00:29:50.359
<v Speaker 3>to these RFPs, I'd love to have you do that

584
00:29:50.400 --> 00:29:51.119
<v Speaker 3>here as we close.

585
00:29:51.640 --> 00:29:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So, first and foremost, I think However, the opportunity

586
00:29:58.480 --> 00:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>comes to formal RFP verbal requests somewhere, you know, request

587
00:30:03.519 --> 00:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>for information whatever, that might be the first thing you've

588
00:30:06.720 --> 00:30:09.839
<v Speaker 1>got to be willing to do is take take a

589
00:30:09.920 --> 00:30:13.119
<v Speaker 1>breath and really look at this thing and ask yourself,

590
00:30:14.000 --> 00:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>what is this initial thing telling me? And let's think

591
00:30:17.480 --> 00:30:20.039
<v Speaker 1>about the more formal RP. Because if it's the verbal request,

592
00:30:20.039 --> 00:30:22.279
<v Speaker 1>it's like, hey, well that's easy. It's like, wait, stop

593
00:30:22.359 --> 00:30:24.559
<v Speaker 1>right there for a minute, help me better understand what

594
00:30:24.599 --> 00:30:27.359
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to achieve before I start talking about myself. Right,

595
00:30:27.400 --> 00:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the one. But on the formal side of this,

596
00:30:29.799 --> 00:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>it's you really got to read it, right, I mean,

597
00:30:32.799 --> 00:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you got to read the dang thing, and you have

598
00:30:36.319 --> 00:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to really think about, Okay, what is this as written

599
00:30:39.279 --> 00:30:42.440
<v Speaker 1>telling us? Look, and I know you're making some assumptions,

600
00:30:42.440 --> 00:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>but looks like it's already been written for looks like

601
00:30:45.920 --> 00:30:48.799
<v Speaker 1>this is pretty early stage. And then you can take

602
00:30:48.920 --> 00:30:54.039
<v Speaker 1>that that initial understanding and match it up with the

603
00:30:54.119 --> 00:30:57.759
<v Speaker 1>relationship strategy that you do or don't have in your account,

604
00:30:58.319 --> 00:31:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and you can start to make some of the decisions

605
00:31:00.680 --> 00:31:04.240
<v Speaker 1>about next steps. But what I promise you is a

606
00:31:04.359 --> 00:31:08.359
<v Speaker 1>universal truth is that unless you wrote the RFP, which

607
00:31:08.359 --> 00:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>we're not talking about in this case, that the first

608
00:31:12.279 --> 00:31:15.839
<v Speaker 1>next step is to is to get in front of

609
00:31:15.960 --> 00:31:21.359
<v Speaker 1>people to better understand do you have any opportunity to

610
00:31:21.400 --> 00:31:25.440
<v Speaker 1>help this customer think through this conversation more widely and

611
00:31:25.599 --> 00:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>deeply than they would have if we weren't in the room.

612
00:31:30.039 --> 00:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>That's the first decision you got to make, and then

613
00:31:33.039 --> 00:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>get into the how are we going to do that?

614
00:31:35.240 --> 00:31:37.359
<v Speaker 1>So that you can then show up And I think

615
00:31:37.359 --> 00:31:40.079
<v Speaker 1>this is the other thing I would recommend you have

616
00:31:40.160 --> 00:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to show up at these meetings with something. The RFP

617
00:31:44.519 --> 00:31:46.279
<v Speaker 1>influencer that I talked about a few minutes ago is

618
00:31:46.279 --> 00:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a good example that you can use to get people's attention.

619
00:31:50.319 --> 00:31:53.759
<v Speaker 1>Here's another quick example. In these large managed print services

620
00:31:53.799 --> 00:31:56.119
<v Speaker 1>deals that I used to work on, we had a

621
00:31:56.160 --> 00:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>ten question test and I loved this. We would get

622
00:31:59.680 --> 00:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a meeting with we would try to get it with

623
00:32:01.480 --> 00:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>multiple people, but even if it was only one, we

624
00:32:04.519 --> 00:32:07.759
<v Speaker 1>had ten questions. And I've helped other clients I walked

625
00:32:07.799 --> 00:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>them through this example for and some of our clients,

626
00:32:09.440 --> 00:32:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I've helped them kind of build their own version of

627
00:32:11.000 --> 00:32:13.319
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't answer to be ten, it might be five, whatever,

628
00:32:13.400 --> 00:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>But we had ten salient points, and they were discrete questions.

629
00:32:17.440 --> 00:32:21.160
<v Speaker 1>They were yes, no, They break the rule on open

630
00:32:21.240 --> 00:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>ended questions. They were closed ended questions, but they were

631
00:32:23.680 --> 00:32:26.079
<v Speaker 1>purposefully closed ended because we would say to everybody in

632
00:32:26.119 --> 00:32:28.279
<v Speaker 1>the room, Okay, we're going to ask you ten questions.

633
00:32:28.480 --> 00:32:31.079
<v Speaker 1>Don't share your answers with anybody else. And the first

634
00:32:31.160 --> 00:32:34.599
<v Speaker 1>question would be who, by name and title is the

635
00:32:34.880 --> 00:32:39.680
<v Speaker 1>project sponsor. The second question would be something like what

636
00:32:39.759 --> 00:32:42.599
<v Speaker 1>are the business metrics that are being used by that

637
00:32:42.759 --> 00:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>person to judge the success of this project? The third

638
00:32:46.680 --> 00:32:48.599
<v Speaker 1>was and then we got into some yes and knows

639
00:32:48.640 --> 00:32:51.119
<v Speaker 1>about the collective organization, et cetera. And then when we

640
00:32:51.200 --> 00:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>got down we say okay, we'd go around the room

641
00:32:52.680 --> 00:32:55.039
<v Speaker 1>and say, Rachel, how many yeses or actual answers do

642
00:32:55.079 --> 00:32:57.759
<v Speaker 1>you have? And Rachel would share her answers, Oh, I

643
00:32:57.799 --> 00:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>answered yes, or I have an actual answer to four,

644
00:33:00.440 --> 00:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>somebody else would have five, would to somebody have seven.

645
00:33:02.960 --> 00:33:05.519
<v Speaker 1>We'd say, okay, what does that tell you? And then

646
00:33:05.559 --> 00:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>we would make them we'd make them figure it out,

647
00:33:07.680 --> 00:33:10.039
<v Speaker 1>because what that tells you, first and foremost is we're

648
00:33:10.079 --> 00:33:12.559
<v Speaker 1>all not on the same page. We all don't have

649
00:33:12.599 --> 00:33:14.359
<v Speaker 1>the same answers. And then we would say, look, here's

650
00:33:14.359 --> 00:33:17.839
<v Speaker 1>our experience. Our experience is if you can't do eight,

651
00:33:17.920 --> 00:33:20.440
<v Speaker 1>if you can't answer eight or nine of these ten

652
00:33:20.519 --> 00:33:24.240
<v Speaker 1>questions collectively, you should not do this project with anyone

653
00:33:25.279 --> 00:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>because we know from our experience, and we can point

654
00:33:28.240 --> 00:33:31.559
<v Speaker 1>to other accounts clients where it didn't work because they

655
00:33:31.559 --> 00:33:34.319
<v Speaker 1>couldn't like we have learned, these are the ten questions

656
00:33:34.480 --> 00:33:36.359
<v Speaker 1>that will tell you whether or not this project is

657
00:33:36.400 --> 00:33:39.319
<v Speaker 1>going to succeed, whether you do it with us or not. Now,

658
00:33:39.400 --> 00:33:41.480
<v Speaker 1>some of those couple of those questions probably started to

659
00:33:41.559 --> 00:33:43.960
<v Speaker 1>lean towards our differentiation, but a lot of them were

660
00:33:43.960 --> 00:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>actually about them. And so the point I'm trying to

661
00:33:46.680 --> 00:33:48.599
<v Speaker 1>make here is a lot of what we've been talking

662
00:33:48.599 --> 00:33:51.480
<v Speaker 1>about today is about how you sell, not what you sell.

663
00:33:53.000 --> 00:33:55.079
<v Speaker 1>A lot of it has been about your willingness to

664
00:33:55.119 --> 00:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>look somebody in the eye and go listen, whether you

665
00:33:58.279 --> 00:34:00.839
<v Speaker 1>buy from me or not. Let's just put that to

666
00:34:00.880 --> 00:34:03.039
<v Speaker 1>the side for a second. Well, let's just have a

667
00:34:03.079 --> 00:34:06.440
<v Speaker 1>live conversation about what you're trying to achieve, how you're

668
00:34:06.440 --> 00:34:09.280
<v Speaker 1>going to measure success, whether or not you've got alignment

669
00:34:09.360 --> 00:34:11.760
<v Speaker 1>around that internally, so that we can then have an

670
00:34:11.800 --> 00:34:14.079
<v Speaker 1>odd conversation about what does it truly take to get there?

671
00:34:14.239 --> 00:34:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Because if you're willing to have that conversation with me,

672
00:34:16.920 --> 00:34:19.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm willing to give you everything you need to include.

673
00:34:19.679 --> 00:34:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Look you in the eye and say I'm not the

674
00:34:21.199 --> 00:34:24.840
<v Speaker 1>right fit. Who would deny that? I'll tell you who'll

675
00:34:24.880 --> 00:34:27.159
<v Speaker 1>deny it. The one third of the people who don't

676
00:34:27.159 --> 00:34:29.599
<v Speaker 1>want anything to do with this goes all the way

677
00:34:29.599 --> 00:34:31.400
<v Speaker 1>back to what we talked to the beginning, and that's

678
00:34:31.760 --> 00:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's a data point, right, And I know what

679
00:34:34.519 --> 00:34:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I do with that data point. I'll let you choose

680
00:34:37.760 --> 00:34:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to do what you want to do with that data point.

681
00:34:40.159 --> 00:34:42.360
<v Speaker 1>And I and I think that's what it really boils

682
00:34:42.400 --> 00:34:46.079
<v Speaker 1>down to. This is about how you react in a moment,

683
00:34:47.280 --> 00:34:50.079
<v Speaker 1>not what you say. I mean, what you say comes

684
00:34:50.119 --> 00:34:53.320
<v Speaker 1>right behind it. But you get my point. Yeah, that's

685
00:34:53.360 --> 00:34:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that's my summary. Oh, last, but not least, you know

686
00:34:57.840 --> 00:35:01.280
<v Speaker 1>my favorite. Out of every ten deals you work, you're

687
00:35:01.320 --> 00:35:03.639
<v Speaker 1>going to win three just for showing up. They know you,

688
00:35:03.679 --> 00:35:06.400
<v Speaker 1>they love you, they like you. Whatever you're gonna lose,

689
00:35:06.440 --> 00:35:08.840
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna lose three just for showing up. They know you,

690
00:35:08.880 --> 00:35:12.360
<v Speaker 1>they hate you, whatever, you know. It's the four in

691
00:35:12.400 --> 00:35:15.519
<v Speaker 1>the middle. That you really got to compete for, and

692
00:35:15.559 --> 00:35:18.400
<v Speaker 1>so your ability to quickly assess when you get an

693
00:35:18.519 --> 00:35:21.559
<v Speaker 1>RFP in the mail, you know it ain't the first three, right,

694
00:35:21.719 --> 00:35:23.599
<v Speaker 1>It ain't one of the ones you're gonna win automatically

695
00:35:23.960 --> 00:35:26.360
<v Speaker 1>because you got the RP and the mail. But now

696
00:35:26.519 --> 00:35:28.360
<v Speaker 1>so now it's in one of the other two categories.

697
00:35:28.480 --> 00:35:30.480
<v Speaker 1>This is one you're really gonna have to compete for

698
00:35:30.960 --> 00:35:32.880
<v Speaker 1>or one you're gonna lose no matter what. And I

699
00:35:32.920 --> 00:35:35.639
<v Speaker 1>think it was our friend John mcmahonon said there are

700
00:35:35.639 --> 00:35:38.400
<v Speaker 1>two winners in every deal, right, the REP who wins

701
00:35:38.400 --> 00:35:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the deal and the first REP to get out of

702
00:35:40.440 --> 00:35:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the deal because they realize they don't belong in it.

703
00:35:43.559 --> 00:35:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Whoever said it, I'll give John credit. I've never you know,

704
00:35:46.360 --> 00:35:48.039
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know if it's true or not. But

705
00:35:48.119 --> 00:35:51.119
<v Speaker 1>somebody said, I think it's brilliant. So that's the thing here,

706
00:35:51.199 --> 00:35:56.679
<v Speaker 1>really understand quickly can we compete and is it worth

707
00:35:56.679 --> 00:36:03.239
<v Speaker 1>competing for? Strategy and then execution the end the end world?

708
00:36:03.280 --> 00:36:06.039
<v Speaker 3>Drop the mic right there, fight for those four All right,

709
00:36:06.119 --> 00:36:08.559
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much, Brian. I appreciate you joining me

710
00:36:08.639 --> 00:36:09.920
<v Speaker 3>for the conversation today.

711
00:36:10.360 --> 00:36:13.039
<v Speaker 1>My pleasure. Thanks Rachel, see soon, all right, and.

712
00:36:12.960 --> 00:36:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Thank you to all of you for listening to the

713
00:36:14.800 --> 00:36:16.400
<v Speaker 3>Audible Ready Sales podcast.

714
00:36:19.039 --> 00:36:22.960
<v Speaker 4>At Force Management, we're focused on transforming sales organizations into

715
00:36:23.119 --> 00:36:27.559
<v Speaker 4>elite teams. Our proven methodologies deliver programs that build company

716
00:36:27.599 --> 00:36:31.760
<v Speaker 4>alignment and fuel repeatable revenue growth. Give your teams the

717
00:36:31.800 --> 00:36:34.960
<v Speaker 4>ability to execute the growth strategy at the point of sale.

718
00:36:35.440 --> 00:36:39.360
<v Speaker 4>Our strength is our experience. The proof is in our results.

719
00:36:39.639 --> 00:36:43.559
<v Speaker 4>Let's get started. Visit us at forcemanagement dot com.

720
00:36:43.840 --> 00:36:46.639
<v Speaker 2>You've been listening to the Audible Ready podcast. To not

721
00:36:46.760 --> 00:36:49.519
<v Speaker 2>miss an episode, subscribe to the show in your favorite

722
00:36:49.519 --> 00:36:51.360
<v Speaker 2>podcast player Until next time.
