Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome back to the Epstein chronicles.
Speaker 1: When we talk about Jeffrey Epstein and him moving in
Speaker 1: the hallways of power, there is no doubt that's exactly
Speaker 1: what he was doing, whether it be with ex presidents
Speaker 1: or politicians or hotshots in the financial sector. Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 1: was rubbing shoulders and breaking bread with all of them,
Speaker 1: and there is not even a doubt about it. But
Speaker 1: there are people who still refuse to accept the fact
Speaker 1: that Jeffrey Epstein certainly had ties to intelligence and to
Speaker 1: groups like the FBI. Well, today we have an article
Speaker 1: from BuzzFeed that is talking about one of those ties,
Speaker 1: and under normal circumstances, I'd be more than willing to
Speaker 1: write it all off as a coincidence. But there are
Speaker 1: so many coincidences here when we're talking about Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 1: that they all can't be coincidence. Today we have an
Speaker 1: article from BuzzFeed headline the State Department once rented a
Speaker 1: townhouse seized from Iran to Jeffrey Epstein, then suit him
Speaker 1: for subletting it. This article was authored by A. Rosie Gray.
Speaker 1: A weird and forgotten case from the nineteen nineties shows
Speaker 1: how connected Jeffrey Epstein was to power. This article was
Speaker 1: first published on July fourteenth of twenty and nineteen. So
Speaker 1: right off the bat, it shows you the ties he
Speaker 1: had to the State Department. What do you think anyone
Speaker 1: can just rent the place from the State Department. Obviously
Speaker 1: he knew somebody had the inside leg that this place
Speaker 1: was going to be available, and then jumped at it.
Speaker 1: Then he sublets it to this lawyer, and according to
Speaker 1: reports and the lawsuit that came after it, nobody paid
Speaker 1: the rent on it. Jeffrey Epstein's Upper East Side mansion
Speaker 1: has become notorious for its reportedly the interior decor, immense
Speaker 1: size and monetary value, and as the site of some
Speaker 1: of his lurid alleged crimes, not alleged actual crimes. And
Speaker 1: we're gonna talk a little bit more about the decor
Speaker 1: later on, because it's pretty important. Right, all of these
Speaker 1: people that went to Jeffrey Epstein's residence and saw this decor,
Speaker 1: saw all of this weird stuff, well they should have
Speaker 1: known right away right then that something was seriously a miss.
Speaker 1: But instead, these people kept coming back, they kept breaking
Speaker 1: bread with them, and then they have the audacity to
Speaker 1: get up there and tell us that they had no
Speaker 1: idea something was wrong. But Epstein, the pedophile who has
Speaker 1: been charged with sex trafficking and accused of sexually abusing
Speaker 1: young girls, used to live in a different Upper Eastside
Speaker 1: mansion only a few blocks away. It's a mansion that
Speaker 1: embroiled him in a dispute involving a lawyer for French
Speaker 1: connection heroin ring suspects the State Department and the government
Speaker 1: of Iran. Huh interesting, huh. You know they would pitch
Speaker 1: it to you and to us as Jeffrey Epstein just
Speaker 1: being you know, a regular guy that happened to abuse
Speaker 1: some girls. But there's a lot more here then the
Speaker 1: legacy media wants to let on. And the fact is
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein was completely juiced. He was completely tied in
Speaker 1: and certainly had friends within the government, State Department, FBI,
Speaker 1: CIA wherever he had friends, and they were embedded, and
Speaker 1: they had all kinds of motivation to keep him protected,
Speaker 1: whether that was he had compromant on them, or he
Speaker 1: was paying them, or whatever it was, they had good
Speaker 1: reason to keep his secrets. The now forgotten case laid
Speaker 1: out newspaper clips from the time and extensive court documents
Speaker 1: offers a glimpse into a strange facet of Epstein's life
Speaker 1: at the time, and constitutes an early example of Epstein
Speaker 1: popping up in the media as a rich and connected
Speaker 1: but mysterious New York figure. This guy was operating in
Speaker 1: the shadows forever, even though he was a high profile bagman.
Speaker 1: And that's exactly what he was, right. Look at how
Speaker 1: much money he popped over to the Clinton Foundation and
Speaker 1: the Clinton Global Initiative. Look at how much money he
Speaker 1: spread around to various political officials throughout his time. This
Speaker 1: was a bag man. And this is exactly what I
Speaker 1: talk about all the time when I say politics are corrupt.
Speaker 1: It's people like this behind the scenes, these money movers
Speaker 1: that are injecting all of this dark money into politics,
Speaker 1: into you name it, that are the real problem. Beginning
Speaker 1: in February of nineteen ninety two, Epstein rented a former
Speaker 1: Iranian government building that had been taken over by the
Speaker 1: State Department during the Iranian Revolution at four East sixty
Speaker 1: ninth Street, in one of Manhattan's most expensive neighborhoods, and
Speaker 1: at a rate of fifteen thousand dollars a month. Now,
Speaker 1: why is the State Department renting out buildings anyway, what
Speaker 1: are they a real estate unit that we don't know about?
Speaker 1: They have some real estate agents on staff as well.
Speaker 1: Here's an idea, worry about State Department. Shit. Stop with
Speaker 1: the real estate Stop spending our money. Stop wasting taxpayer
Speaker 1: dollars on dumb shit. But things went sour when the
Speaker 1: government sued Epstein in the Southern District of New York,
Speaker 1: alleging that he had at one point failed to pay
Speaker 1: the rent on time and had violated the lease by
Speaker 1: moving out in early nineteen ninety six and subletting the
Speaker 1: place without the State Department's permission. Again, why is the
Speaker 1: State Department in the business of being a landlord? Considering
Speaker 1: they can barely do the job that they're employed to
Speaker 1: do over at the State Department, I don't know why
Speaker 1: they're meddling over here in the real estate market as well.
Speaker 1: His subtenant was Ivan Fisher, a New York City criminal
Speaker 1: defense lawyer who had famously defended members of the French
Speaker 1: Connection and Pizza Connection drug rings. The government also sued Fisher.
Speaker 1: A lawyer for Epstein, did not respond to a request
Speaker 1: for comment, and attempts to reach Fisher were unsuccessful. A
Speaker 1: New York Daily News article from the time headline, lawyer
Speaker 1: pays not a cent for palatial east Side. Diggs said
Speaker 1: Fisher had stopped paying rent after learning that the State
Speaker 1: Department had terminated Epstein's lease as a result of the
Speaker 1: conflict over Fischer's subtendancy, and was thus living in the
Speaker 1: home for free. Typically, these rich people, right, if they
Speaker 1: can find a situation to grift, they're gonna do that.
Speaker 1: These dudes have no interest in paying any money. They
Speaker 1: have no interest in paying rent like the rest of us.
Speaker 1: So if they can find a way to grift and
Speaker 1: get by without paying rent, that's exactly what they're gonna do.
Speaker 1: I'm the perfect tenant, Fisher told The Daily News. The
Speaker 1: paper described the homes opulence, carved oak doors, a white
Speaker 1: marble foyer, three kitchens, three bedrooms, a library with Florida ceiling, bookcases,
Speaker 1: a steam room, nineteenth century chandeliers, brass sconces, and a
Speaker 1: white marble central staircase. I pray to God, I can stay,
Speaker 1: Fisher told The Daily News. I mean, for real, yeah,
Speaker 1: you can stay if you pony up a couple of bucks,
Speaker 1: you cheap ass bastard. Epstein is described in the story
Speaker 1: as a Palm Beach, Florida financial advisor. You mean, pedophile,
Speaker 1: child abuser, all around scuzzball like his palll Glane. The
Speaker 1: incident is also briefly mentioned in Vicky Ward's two thousand
Speaker 1: and three Vanity Fair profile on Epstein. You know the
Speaker 1: puffs of the puff piece, Yeah, that profile. The government's
Speaker 1: complaint rested on its assertion that Epstein had not received
Speaker 1: permission before installing Fisher as the subtenant, and its grievance
Speaker 1: with that was only intensified by his charging Fisher twenty
Speaker 1: grand a month for the rent when the state was
Speaker 1: charging fifteen thousand, netting Epstein a monthly profit. Oh god forbid,
Speaker 1: someone makes a profit. The State department got to get
Speaker 1: their cut of that too, right again? What are they doing?
Speaker 1: Why are they out here acting like the super Here's
Speaker 1: an idea. Don't you have some kind of rebellion to
Speaker 1: work on. Don't you have some kind of regime change
Speaker 1: over in some far flung province of Africa to be
Speaker 1: involved in? What are you guys doing worrying about landlord shit?
Speaker 1: The court documents in the case include a later amended
Speaker 1: complaint by the government which added more defendants to the
Speaker 1: suit a clutch of other lawyers, whom the government alleged
Speaker 1: were in turn subletting office space from Fisher. In a
Speaker 1: sworn statement, one of those lawyers, Lawrence Gerzog, told the
Speaker 1: court that he had given Fisher free legal services in
Speaker 1: exchange for office space among several other lawyers. Quit pro quo.
Speaker 1: That's how this world works. These guys they work on
Speaker 1: you know, business trades or later on down the road.
Speaker 1: You'll do me a favor if I do this for
Speaker 1: you now. Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. The
Speaker 1: government eventually moved to a vic Fisher, and the court
Speaker 1: ordered Fisher and Epstein, who in the course of the
Speaker 1: process were eventually involved in litigation against each other, to
Speaker 1: pay back rent and to vacate the premises, and a
Speaker 1: viction order was served on July sixteenth, nineteen ninety eight,
Speaker 1: and a Marshall noted on the service receipt that the
Speaker 1: tenants had moved out. So it took a marshall to
Speaker 1: come over here to get things locked in and to
Speaker 1: get this lawyer Fisher out. Talk about an absolute grifter.
Speaker 1: I mean, you're a high profile lawyer. You don't have
Speaker 1: enough money to just go pay rent somewhere. You have
Speaker 1: to take up space. Getting there wasn't an easy process
Speaker 1: for the State Department, which had begun by changing strongly
Speaker 1: worded letters with Epstein's lawyer, Jeffrey Schantz. These were included
Speaker 1: in the court filings. As you are aware, mister Epstein's
Speaker 1: apparent departure from the House and his failure to make
Speaker 1: timely rental payments in February and March of this year
Speaker 1: have been matters of serious concern for this office, wrote
Speaker 1: Thomas E. Burns, Junior, then the Deputy Director of the
Speaker 1: Office of Foreign Missions in April nineteen ninety six, in
Speaker 1: a letter attached to court filings, Burns wrote that the
Speaker 1: OFM had already found someone to take over the lease
Speaker 1: from Epstein, a developer named Xenophon Galinis, and that they
Speaker 1: would not approve the sublease to Fisher. So again, the
Speaker 1: real problem for me here is why is the State
Speaker 1: Department leasing out buildings? Is that in their charter to
Speaker 1: lease out buildings and act as real estate agents. In June,
Speaker 1: Burns wrote again, this time directly to Epstein, to notify
Speaker 1: him that he had violated the by leaving the property
Speaker 1: and subletting it, and to give him thirty days to
Speaker 1: kick Fisher out and move in again himself. In August,
Speaker 1: Burns wrote again to tell Epstein that because Fisher was
Speaker 1: still there, the State Department was ending the lease. At
Speaker 1: the end of October, the government filed suit. Epstein was
Speaker 1: accused of carrying out an effort to put someone else
Speaker 1: in the house and in his stead without clearing it
Speaker 1: with the State Department. When Richard C. Massey, an OFM
Speaker 1: official who had been the point person for Epstein's lease,
Speaker 1: was deposed in nineteen ninety seven by the defendant's lawyers,
Speaker 1: he told them that Epstein had appeared to make a
Speaker 1: concerted effort to put someone else in the property without
Speaker 1: state knowing. Mister Epstein was shopping the property around town
Speaker 1: without our knowledge, all over town. Massey said. We had
Speaker 1: calls from real estate agents who asked us about it.
Speaker 1: I do not know how many people in the city
Speaker 1: of New York had a copy of mister Epstein's lease.
Speaker 1: So Epstein was trying to make five grand a month
Speaker 1: on this place. Basically, what it comes down to, he
Speaker 1: was subleasing it, and that's a big thing in cities
Speaker 1: like New York. Somebody will run an apartment, then they'll
Speaker 1: sublease it. Massey was not able to be reached for comment.
Speaker 1: What was Epstein up to? Why had he abandoned the
Speaker 1: decadent mansion so abruptly and moved out without getting permission
Speaker 1: to sublet Epstein made it publicly known when he was
Speaker 1: moving out, telling the New York Times in January nineteen
Speaker 1: ninety six that the mansion on East seventy first Street
Speaker 1: that would become famous in the context of his alleged
Speaker 1: crimes was now his and my guests here and remember, folks,
Speaker 1: just to guess. Speculation is that he left the State
Speaker 1: Department house because he knew he couldn't bug it, he
Speaker 1: couldn't wire it, he couldn't set it up for surveillance.
Speaker 1: That's why he moved into the townhouse that he got
Speaker 1: from Wexner, where he could set up the CCTV room
Speaker 1: and wire it for surveillance. It is unclear how much
Speaker 1: Epstein paid for the house, if anything, as it was
Speaker 1: reportedly transferred without a purchase price from a trust link
Speaker 1: to both him and Wexner to a company controlled by Epstein.
Speaker 1: According to sources, it was for one dollar and those
Speaker 1: are real solid sources who say that as well, So
Speaker 1: take it for what you will. Fisher, who reportedly once
Speaker 1: counseled law students to look into a mirror and practice
Speaker 1: telling potential clients their retainer was one hundred thousand dollars,
Speaker 1: was banned from practicing in federal court in the Southern
Speaker 1: District of New York in twenty thirteen after a court
Speaker 1: grievance committee ruled that he had stolen money from a client.
Speaker 1: Well that shouldn't shock you. Somebody like that in bed
Speaker 1: with Epstein, somebody like that renting something from Epstein. Look,
Speaker 1: he knew every scumbag in the world. Just take a
Speaker 1: look at that black book, and if you find your
Speaker 1: name in that black book, it's safe to say that
Speaker 1: you're a scumbag. So once again, another connection to the
Speaker 1: federal government, and still many questions remain that have not
Speaker 1: been answered. That's going to do it for this episode.
Speaker 1: If you'd like to contact me, you can do that
Speaker 1: at Bobby Kapuchi at Protonmeil dot com. That's bo bbu
Speaker 1: Y c apu Cci at Protonmeil dot com. You can
Speaker 1: also find me on Twitter at bo bbuy Underscore c
Speaker 1: ap u Cci. The link that I discussed can be
Speaker 1: found in the description box. Prince Andrew, the Joe Exotic
Speaker 1: of the Windsor family, was at Jeffrey Epstein's New York
Speaker 1: mansion at the same time as horrifically abused sex slave.
Speaker 1: Report claims. This article was authored by Tariq Tahir. Prince
Speaker 1: Andrew stayed at Jeffrey Epstein's mansion at the same time
Speaker 1: as a horrifically abused sex slave. It was reported just
Speaker 1: that on its face alone, is enough for Prince Andrew
Speaker 1: to face serious, serious questions, right. I mean, if this
Speaker 1: was a normal guy, just a regular guy, and he
Speaker 1: was being accused of all of this, and people were
Speaker 1: putting him at this place when girls were being trafficked,
Speaker 1: et cetera, et cetera, and we weren't talking about all
Speaker 1: of the political implications and the power structure and all
Speaker 1: of that jazz, this would have been a rico case.
Speaker 1: Faster than you can blink your eyes, they would have
Speaker 1: slapped all of these people with rico. Everybody that was
Speaker 1: there while this girl was being abused. They would have
Speaker 1: seen there, at the very least frozen everybody's assets until
Speaker 1: they could have went and looked through everything with a
Speaker 1: fine toothed calm. That's what happens to the rest of us. Right,
Speaker 1: But when you have a two tier justice system, well
Speaker 1: are betters so called betters, the so called elite, so
Speaker 1: called polite society, Well, those laws were all put on
Speaker 1: the books by their friends, so they know how to
Speaker 1: navigate the loopholes. They know how to avoid the pitfalls
Speaker 1: of the law that the rest of us would get
Speaker 1: swooped up in. And we see it time and time again,
Speaker 1: but it has not been as blindingly obvious as it
Speaker 1: is now ever, in my opinion, to what is truly
Speaker 1: going on at the very top of the power structure,
Speaker 1: be it politically, financially, or otherwise. The woman who was
Speaker 1: in her early twenties suffered abuse that was too graphic
Speaker 1: and perverted to be heard in a court. To be
Speaker 1: heard in a court. Documents filed as part of a
Speaker 1: lawsuit say, now we have read about some pretty crazy
Speaker 1: stuff in this case, right, so think about what could
Speaker 1: be so disgustingly gross that they couldn't even read it
Speaker 1: in the courtroom. That just goes to show you the
Speaker 1: horrific abuse that these girls suffered at the hands of
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein and his friends. And for all of these years,
Speaker 1: everybody looked the other way. For all of these years,
Speaker 1: nobody had the courage to stand up and stop these people.
Speaker 1: If they would have listened to Maria, none of this
Speaker 1: would have occurred. But now that where we're at, we're
Speaker 1: at the point where we are on this journey, well,
Speaker 1: the survivors aren't taking it anymore. They have come forward
Speaker 1: and mass and they are demanding justice. They are demanding
Speaker 1: that these people are held responsible. And I have to
Speaker 1: tell you, folks, I don't think that this is going
Speaker 1: to go away until justice has been served. I think
Speaker 1: there is too much emotion, there is too much anger,
Speaker 1: and there are too many people who have decided that
Speaker 1: enough is enough. The Duke of York has faced intense
Speaker 1: scrutiny for his friendship with the sixty six year old
Speaker 1: wealthy financier pedophile who took his own life while awaiting
Speaker 1: trial on child sex trafficking charges. And again, folks, it's
Speaker 1: not just his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. It's not just
Speaker 1: his relationship, because then he would just be an enabler.
Speaker 1: He'd be in the same realm as Trumps, as Clinton,
Speaker 1: as all of these other enablers that were around this man,
Speaker 1: but Andrew's on a different level. Not only was this
Speaker 1: man an enabler, not only was he a honduit used
Speaker 1: for Epstein to break into so called polite society. Oh no,
Speaker 1: the Joe Exotic of the Windsor family, he also was
Speaker 1: partaking in the actual sex abuse all right. So that
Speaker 1: puts him on another stratosphere in my opinion, another level
Speaker 1: of disgusting, gross individual. And the fact that this guy
Speaker 1: has never really had to answer any questions besides what
Speaker 1: he answered from Emily Maitlis. It goes beyond when I
Speaker 1: am able to comprehend, because folks, I have seen it
Speaker 1: with my own eyes. I have seen how vicious rico
Speaker 1: charges can be. I have seen what rico cases do
Speaker 1: to families. And the fact that people are getting slapped
Speaker 1: with rico cases for so called illegal gambling while these
Speaker 1: people are still able to run around and commit these
Speaker 1: horrific crimes. There is no way for anyone to justify it.
Speaker 1: He has admitted to staying with Epstein at his New
Speaker 1: York mansion in twenty ten, but has always denied he
Speaker 1: witnessed or took part in any wrongdoing there. Of course,
Speaker 1: he denies that he was never gonna come forward and
Speaker 1: admit to anything. Hell, even if he just had evidence
Speaker 1: of what was going on, we couldn't expect this guy
Speaker 1: to come forward because he's a scumbag, right. He's not
Speaker 1: going to come forward and rat out his buddy Gilaane.
Speaker 1: He's not going to come forward and rat out the
Speaker 1: rest of the people that were involved, especially considering that
Speaker 1: Gilaine probably still has all of the information on Andrew,
Speaker 1: probably still has all of the dossiers. She certainly has
Speaker 1: the keys to where all the bodies are buried. But
Speaker 1: The Mail on Sunday reports that it has gathered evidence
Speaker 1: that the victim was in Epstein's Upper east Side East
Speaker 1: Side townhouse during Andrew's six days stay, during which he
Speaker 1: was photographed waving from the door. So basically, Andrew was
Speaker 1: at Jeffrey Epstein's house, according to this report, while this
Speaker 1: girl was being horrifically and brutally raped multiple times. Yet
Speaker 1: this scumbag son of a bitch says he doesn't know anything,
Speaker 1: he didn't see anything, he didn't hear anything. How about
Speaker 1: the girl being smuggled up to the room. Joe Exotic
Speaker 1: of the Windsor family. The woman, who was then in
Speaker 1: her twenties, was groomed by Epstein as a teenager, sexually assaulted,
Speaker 1: and forced into a sham lesbian marriage, the paper says,
Speaker 1: And obviously the girl's identification in this article has not
Speaker 1: been released, so I'm not going to even talk about
Speaker 1: who I think it is or anything like that. But
Speaker 1: I mean, the things that these girls were subjected to
Speaker 1: by Jeffrey Epstein and his circle are horrific. This is
Speaker 1: the kind of stuff that it's like a Thomas Harris novel, right,
Speaker 1: This is the kind of thing like you'd expect in
Speaker 1: like the book Red Dragon or Silence of the Lambs
Speaker 1: or something. This isn't real life. People don't really act
Speaker 1: like this, that's what you want to think, right, And
Speaker 1: a normal people would say, no way, people can't act
Speaker 1: like this. But unfortunately, folks, these are the sort of
Speaker 1: people we're dealing with in the world. The world is
Speaker 1: a very very dangerous place. And the sooner everybody comes
Speaker 1: to that realization, the sooner everybody realizes that we're dealing
Speaker 1: with just the most devious, disgusting people in the history
Speaker 1: of the world, perhaps the better off we're all going
Speaker 1: to be, because it's going to take everyone united to
Speaker 1: bring these people down. There can't be better petty squabbling.
Speaker 1: There can't be political divisiveness. There can't be any of it. Okay,
Speaker 1: everybody needs to just drop all of the tribalism bullshit
Speaker 1: when it comes to this case and rally around the
Speaker 1: survivors and rally around the rule of law. Eyewitnesses and
Speaker 1: official records indicate the woman referred to as Caitlin Doe
Speaker 1: to protect her identity, visited Epstein's sixty million dollar home
Speaker 1: when Andrew was there. So again, just him being there
Speaker 1: while she was getting rape makes him complicit in my opinion.
Speaker 1: And at the very least, they could bring that to
Speaker 1: a grand jury, because we all know that if you
Speaker 1: bring something to a grand jury, you can get a
Speaker 1: ham Sandwich indicted by a grand jury. That's how easy
Speaker 1: it is to get that indictment. So what are they
Speaker 1: waiting for? A source who was also inside the property
Speaker 1: at the time told The Mail on Sunday she believes
Speaker 1: the woman may have given the Duke a foot massage
Speaker 1: while they watched the King's speech with Evstein. Now we
Speaker 1: covered this a couple of days ago about the Eastern
Speaker 1: European woman who was there and giving him a foot massage.
Speaker 1: We know that John Brockman, the literary agent, corroborated that
Speaker 1: in an email to I forget the gentleman's name now,
Speaker 1: it's skipping my mind. It's a Russian named Dmitri something
Speaker 1: or other. Anyway, we know that that's been corroborated, We
Speaker 1: know that it was occurring, We know that the foot
Speaker 1: massage happened, and we know that they were watching a
Speaker 1: king's speech that was set up for them, by the way,
Speaker 1: by Peggy Siegel. Remember her, Oh, I don't know Epstein
Speaker 1: very well. What you're doing to me is like putting
Speaker 1: me on a car in the Holocaust. She had the
Speaker 1: audacity to go there as well as if her personal
Speaker 1: strife is holds a candle to what occurred during the Holocaust.
Speaker 1: What is wrong with these people? That's the kind of
Speaker 1: opinion of themselves that they hold right, that they are
Speaker 1: bigger than the world, They are bigger than everybody else,
Speaker 1: and what happens to them is the most important thing
Speaker 1: in the whole entire universe. Well, folks, I'm here to
Speaker 1: tell them that's not the case. According to a lawsuit
Speaker 1: file to New York. Catlin endured seven years of shocking
Speaker 1: sexual abuse by Epstein after meeting the pedophile at age seventeen.
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein used fraud, the threat of force or coercion
Speaker 1: to cause her to engage in commercial sexual acts, the
Speaker 1: details of which are too graphic and perverted to include
Speaker 1: in this public hearing. Legal document state, how can any
Speaker 1: prosecutor hear this stuff, see this stuff, look at this evidence,
Speaker 1: and not go absolutely crazy and start throwing out rico charges.
Speaker 1: I would be throwing out rico charges like chick lits
Speaker 1: are sold in Tijuana. That's the amount of rico charges
Speaker 1: I'd be throwing out. It would be an absolute insane
Speaker 1: amount of rico charges. Everybody who was even involved, just
Speaker 1: a little bit, would have to answer for it. If
Speaker 1: I was in charge of this, and there is no
Speaker 1: good reason why it's not occurring besides the fact that
Speaker 1: Berman is obviously does There's two things. Either A he
Speaker 1: does not care or b he is inept, And I'll
Speaker 1: let you decide which of the two it is. But
Speaker 1: I have zero faith in the sdn WY to prosecute
Speaker 1: this case correctly. I'm supposed to have faith in Maureen
Speaker 1: Komi come on Folks, come on Callan's case is one
Speaker 1: of the many being pursued against Epstein's estate. Legal documents
Speaker 1: say he gave her free haircuts, beauty t treatments, and
Speaker 1: medical care and made her feel indebted, so she had
Speaker 1: to have sex with him, and that was all part
Speaker 1: of the grooming process. We've seen. We see that in
Speaker 1: all of these sorts of organizations. Keith Rainiery did the
Speaker 1: same thing. They'll bring them in, they'll get them comfortable,
Speaker 1: They'll get them thinking that this is the way of
Speaker 1: the world, and before you know it, they're groomed and
Speaker 1: suffering from Stockholm syndrome. It is absolutely disgusting. But I'll
Speaker 1: tell you what, folks, they all use the same template.
Speaker 1: All of these people have the same blueprint for their
Speaker 1: disgusting behavior. Epstein stopped having sex with Catlin in twenty
Speaker 1: fourteen when she was twenty five because she was too old,
Speaker 1: and she was forced out of an apartment provided provided
Speaker 1: by him, leaving her homeless. And you know what the
Speaker 1: irony of it all is. Jeffrey Epstein loved to abuse
Speaker 1: these women and use them until he no longer wanted
Speaker 1: or needed them, and then he discarded them. Well, the
Speaker 1: irony of that is on the second time around, when
Speaker 1: he got arrested, he was used by his buddies in intelligence,
Speaker 1: and then when his usefulness was over and done with,
Speaker 1: he was also discarded like a piece of trash. Karma
Speaker 1: comes around and it will kick you directly in the fruits.
Speaker 1: Her lawyer, Bradley Edwards, I cannot discuss any of the
Speaker 1: current cases being litigated, And unlike Gloria Allred or Lisa Bloom,
Speaker 1: you can guarantee that Bradley Edwards isn't just spinning his wheels.
Speaker 1: You can guarantee that Bradley Edwards isn't just talking shit.
Speaker 1: Bradley Edwards is doing the right thing and pursuing these
Speaker 1: people to the very bottom of hell if that is
Speaker 1: where he must go. Prince Andrew has faced numerous calls
Speaker 1: to cooperate with an FBI investigation into Epstein and to
Speaker 1: be interviewed by lawyers for his survivors. A spokesperson for
Speaker 1: the lawyers acting for the Duke of York said, we
Speaker 1: will not comment on allegations made by a so called
Speaker 1: witness who has chosen to wait ten years to come
Speaker 1: forward and has chosen to remain anonymous. She's chosen to
Speaker 1: remain anonymous because you sons of bitch is probably would
Speaker 1: have her killed. Who knows what you sons of bitches
Speaker 1: will do. You people are sick in my opinion. All Right,
Speaker 1: Prince Andrew, the Joe Exotic of the Windsor Family, You
Speaker 1: and your cohorts, you and your friends, like Elaine Maxwell,
Speaker 1: she waited ten years to come forward. She probably she
Speaker 1: waited ten years to come forward because she was scared
Speaker 1: for her life. And once that animal died in his
Speaker 1: jail cell, well, people were emboldened a little bit. And
Speaker 1: now that the survivors are taking the narrative back from
Speaker 1: your disgusting, decrepit claw hands, now it's a big problem.
Speaker 1: Now you don't you're not gonna comment on allegations made
Speaker 1: by so called witnesses. Yeah, I have news for you,
Speaker 1: Prince Andrew, the Joe Exotic of the Windsor Family. You
Speaker 1: might not think you're gonna answer questions, but you're gonna
Speaker 1: answer them. They're coming. The heat is coming, the house
Speaker 1: of cards is falling, and you just removed the wrong
Speaker 1: block on this game of life that we called Djenga.
Speaker 1: If you'd like to contact me, you could do that
Speaker 1: at Bobby Kapuchi at proton on mail dot com. That's
Speaker 1: bobbycap use Cci at ProtonMail dot com. You can also
Speaker 1: find me on Twitter at Bobby Underscore cap use Cci.
Speaker 1: All Right, what's up everyone, and welcome back to the
Speaker 1: Epstein Chronicles. So mister Leon Black is back in the
Speaker 1: news after another woman has come forward and she says
Speaker 1: that Leon Black not only raped her, but he raped
Speaker 1: her at Jeffrey Epstein's townhouse. For years now, we've been
Speaker 1: talking on this podcast about Leon Black and his involvement
Speaker 1: with Jeffrey Ebstein, and he was one of the key contributors.
Speaker 1: When we're talking about financially, we're talking about one hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty eight million dollars that this man passed on
Speaker 1: to Jeffrey Epstein for what he says was advice. Now,
Speaker 1: if you believe that I have fantastic beachfront property to
Speaker 1: sell you in Las Vegas, it is absurd to think
Speaker 1: that anybody on this planet is doling out one hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty eight million dollars to somebody like Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 1: simply for advice. Now, what that money was going towards,
Speaker 1: I have no idea. It would be nice if the
Speaker 1: federal government would, you know, kick a Rico case into
Speaker 1: this whole entire mess and get things really solved, But
Speaker 1: they'll never do it. So thankfully, a few of the
Speaker 1: survivors are also suing lyon Black and the banks for
Speaker 1: their role in enabling Jeffrey Epstein, So maybe we'll get
Speaker 1: a little more information there. But one of these days,
Speaker 1: the curtain's going to be pulled back on the financial
Speaker 1: sector and everybody's going to see them for the scoundrels
Speaker 1: that they really are, because you look around all of
Speaker 1: these problems, all of the issues, it all goes back
Speaker 1: to the financial sector. If you follow the money on
Speaker 1: the street, you end up at a drug dealer's office.
Speaker 1: If you follow the money from that office of the
Speaker 1: drug dealer, you inevitably end up with politicians and the
Speaker 1: financial sector. Today we have an article from Lawn Crime headline.
Speaker 1: Woman files lawsuit accusing ex hedge fund executive Leon Black
Speaker 1: of rapinger inside Jeffrey Epstein's townhouse. This article was authored
Speaker 1: by Adam Klassfeld. Financier Leon Black raped a woman inside
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan townhouse in two thousand and two. A
Speaker 1: new lawsuit under new York's Adult Survivors Act alleges. So,
Speaker 1: this New York Survivors Act is a law that they
Speaker 1: put on the books so that people could go back
Speaker 1: retroactively and try and hold their abuser or their alleged
Speaker 1: abuser to account. And New York is giving a one
Speaker 1: year grace period under this law for people to pursue
Speaker 1: these sorts of charges. Along with Black, Epstein's estate and
Speaker 1: its executors are also named as defendants. Black stepped down
Speaker 1: as CEO of the multi billion dollar hedge fund Apollo
Speaker 1: Global Management amid scrutiny of his ties to Epstein more
Speaker 1: than a year and a half ago, in March of
Speaker 1: twenty twenty one. He has faced lawsuits from two women
Speaker 1: since then, the earlier being a still active case filed
Speaker 1: by a Russian model named Gouzell Ganieva. And we've talked
Speaker 1: extensively about miss Ganieva's allegations and what she says happened
Speaker 1: to her at the hands of Leon Black, and it's
Speaker 1: pretty disturbing what she has to say. Now, of course,
Speaker 1: none of us were there, we don't know what went down.
Speaker 1: But whenever you have these kinds of disturbing allegations, against
Speaker 1: somebody who is in the orbit of somebody like Jeffrey Epstein,
Speaker 1: you definitely have to take them seriously. And as an
Speaker 1: investigator or a prosecutor, you better have all of your
Speaker 1: ducks in a row. And I don't want to hear shit, Oh,
Speaker 1: Leon Black's just too powerful to go after. I don't
Speaker 1: want to hear that. This is a man who, like
Speaker 1: everybody else, puts on his pants the same way as us.
Speaker 1: He shouldn't be afforded any sort of special privileges or
Speaker 1: special circumstance. If he did this, he should be held accountable.
Speaker 1: The latest case comes from the same law firm behind
Speaker 1: that suit, WIGDORLLP, whose client, Sherry Pearson, says she was
Speaker 1: a single mother from New Jersey, pulled into Epstein's orbit
Speaker 1: in two thousand. Some two years later, Pearson says Epstein
Speaker 1: introduced her to a businessman whom she now identifies as Black.
Speaker 1: She claims that the hefty financier treated her like a
Speaker 1: rag doll in an alleged sexual assault on the massage
Speaker 1: table of Epstein's townhouse. Back to the massage tables, Huh,
Speaker 1: how many women? How many girls were assaulted on those
Speaker 1: massage tables? Think about that for a minute. Think about
Speaker 1: how brazen this man operated. Think about how he went
Speaker 1: about his business and didn't care about anyone's life, About
Speaker 1: how many lives he ruined, and about how many people
Speaker 1: he absolutely just destroyed. He didn't care. And the people
Speaker 1: around him, the PEO enabling him, people like Leon Black,
Speaker 1: people like Les Wexner, all of these financial institutions, they
Speaker 1: share the blame. Her attorney, Jean Christensen, credited Pearson's ability
Speaker 1: to step forward with her allegations to New York's passage
Speaker 1: of a new law removing the statue of limitations to
Speaker 1: the complaint. Thanks to the passage of the Adult Survivors Act,
Speaker 1: survivors of sexual violence, like our client Ms. Pearson, can
Speaker 1: seek the justice they deserve, no matter how many years
Speaker 1: ago their trauma was suffered. Christiansen wrote, we look forward
Speaker 1: to holding Black and Epstein's estate accountable for their appalling,
Speaker 1: unlawful conduct as alleged in the complaint by our client. Now,
Speaker 1: one thing I will say is it's definitely an uphill
Speaker 1: battle when you have these older allegations like this, and look,
Speaker 1: there's going to be a lot of these cases that
Speaker 1: roll into the court that end up going nowhere, because
Speaker 1: the burden of proof obviously is on the accuser. So
Speaker 1: if you don't have a bunch of evidence, a bunch
Speaker 1: of receipts, it's going to be very hard to have
Speaker 1: a jury render a decision in your favor. But when
Speaker 1: you have a case like this, where we're talking about
Speaker 1: a known offender at this point, or a known alleged defender,
Speaker 1: I should say, well, all bets are off at that point.
Speaker 1: If I'm sitting on a jury and this person comes
Speaker 1: in front of me, I'm going to have a whole
Speaker 1: different outlook, and I'm going to be very receptive to
Speaker 1: what's going on, considering all of the context surrounding them.
Speaker 1: The thirty page complaint lays out a detailed and graphic
Speaker 1: portrait of events said to have taken place roughly two
Speaker 1: decades ago. Black's brutal attack took place in a secluded
Speaker 1: and private area where no one else could see or
Speaker 1: hear Miss Pearson's scream. The complaint states. Pearson claims that,
Speaker 1: saddled by financial setbacks and credit card debt, a Ukrainian
Speaker 1: woman offered to introduce her to a rich man and
Speaker 1: then passed her on to number to a woman with
Speaker 1: a British accent, whom she now identifies as Gallaine Maxwell.
Speaker 1: And it's crazy how elaborate all of this was. How
Speaker 1: many enablers there were, how many A procures there were,
Speaker 1: and how many people who were working underneath Gallayne Maxwell
Speaker 1: and Jeffrey Epstein to make this whole entire machine move
Speaker 1: through Maxwell. Pearson claims she was introduced to Epstein, whom
Speaker 1: she quotes describing himself as a massage slut. Prosecutors say
Speaker 1: that Epstein ran a pyramid scheme of abuse where he
Speaker 1: paid girls and younger women to massage them and receive
Speaker 1: a finder's fee to recruit others like them. Yeah, a
Speaker 1: sexual Ponzi scheme. You have Sam bankmin Freed running a
Speaker 1: real Ponzi scheme with money. Well, Jeffrey Epstein was doing
Speaker 1: the same thing, but with sex. Pearson's lawsuit mirrors that story,
Speaker 1: and she said that Epstein made a vulgar and disgusting
Speaker 1: remark to her after the September Elene of the attacks
Speaker 1: on the World Trade Center that stood out in her memory. Specifically,
Speaker 1: Epstein began talking about how bad it was for foreign
Speaker 1: models who had come for fashion week and now could
Speaker 1: not leave the lawsuit states he said that modeling agencies
Speaker 1: had stranded these women with no help or money. Disgustingly,
Speaker 1: Epstein remarked that these young girls, mostly teenagers, were in
Speaker 1: such dire financial straits that they would take one hundred
Speaker 1: dollars to get fed upda imagine, And that definitely rings
Speaker 1: true with the way Epstein talked and the way he
Speaker 1: felt about everybody else. He looked at all of these
Speaker 1: girls as nothing more than an inanimate object for him
Speaker 1: to use an abuse. They weren't even human beings to him.
Speaker 1: When Pearson gave massages to him, she said, Epstein masturbated
Speaker 1: and wanted her to perform oral sex on him, but
Speaker 1: she refused. She says, according to the lawsuit, Epstein seized
Speaker 1: upon Pearson's ambition to open a skincare line by introducing
Speaker 1: her back. And this is one of the biggest issues
Speaker 1: that we have to find out and one of the
Speaker 1: issues that remains unsolved. With all of these people around
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein, Leon Black, Jess Staley, Glenn Dubin, all of
Speaker 1: these big, powerful people around him, there's still a big
Speaker 1: shadow hanging over their relationship with Epstein in the overall picture,
Speaker 1: and that's because nobody's dug deep enough. Wanting to please
Speaker 1: the wealthy businessman who Epstein claimed was inclined to help
Speaker 1: her with her skincare product, ms Pearson engaged him in
Speaker 1: meaningless chit chat and at one point included commentary by
Speaker 1: both of them about artwork on the wall in the hallway.
Speaker 1: The lawsuit states. Eventually they heard people who had been
Speaker 1: in the main hallway exit the house, and Black said
Speaker 1: it was time to go up. Describing herself as powerless
Speaker 1: to escape what a lawsuit estimates as a six foot
Speaker 1: four to three hundred pound financier, Pearson accused Black of
Speaker 1: a harrowing attack. At one hundred and twenty five pounds
Speaker 1: and five feet eight inches and his total physical control,
Speaker 1: miss Pearson had no ability to escape the physical power
Speaker 1: of Black's massive body. The lawsuit states. When Black then
Speaker 1: placed his mouth on her vagina and began biting her,
Speaker 1: Miss Pearson experienced excruciating pain. With the top of her
Speaker 1: head precariously inches above the ground and her legs bound
Speaker 1: but to his shoulders, she could only see the lower
Speaker 1: wall closest to her. She had no idea what exactly
Speaker 1: he was doing to her to cause the tearing pain
Speaker 1: she felt or what acts he engaged in. Specifically, during
Speaker 1: the violence, Miss Pearson was in agony and had never
Speaker 1: experienced anything like that before. I mean, for real, If
Speaker 1: these charges in these allegations are proved to be real
Speaker 1: and this really happened, well I have to tell you
Speaker 1: Leon Black deserves to sit his ass in prison for
Speaker 1: a very very long time. Black Ernie Susan Estrich of
Speaker 1: Estrich Golden LLP depicted the lawsuit as an extortion effort.
Speaker 1: That's what they always do, right, Oh, it's all about money.
Speaker 1: They're looking to extort my client. These latest allegations from
Speaker 1: the Whigdor firm are categorically false and part of a
Speaker 1: scheme to extort money from mister Black by threatening to
Speaker 1: destroy his reputation. Estridge said, reputations already destroyed. How much
Speaker 1: more destruction do you need of the reputation here? This
Speaker 1: campaign began nearly eighteen months ago when Whigdoor client Guzelo
Speaker 1: Ganieva filed three separate complaints asserting false and defamatory claims
Speaker 1: against mister Black. These claims were completely contradicted by objective
Speaker 1: contemporaneous evidence, resulting in Wigdor filing and then discarding phony
Speaker 1: legal theories not once, but twice, but three times. Calling
Speaker 1: the allegations a serial abuse of process. The attorney added,
Speaker 1: we intend to defeat these baseless claims and to pursue
Speaker 1: all of our remedy to hold the Whigdor Firm legally
Speaker 1: accountable for their abuse of conduct and misuse of the courts.
Speaker 1: A federal judge previously dismissed a lawsuit by Black alleging
Speaker 1: a plot to destroy his reputation. Look, Leon Black, that's
Speaker 1: not gonna work. No loopholes, no technicalities. You're gonna have
Speaker 1: to go to court and fight these allegations. Either that
Speaker 1: or you're gonna have to pay out the old wazoo
Speaker 1: for a settlement. Those are your two choices. Question is
Speaker 1: which one is Leon Black going to choose? All right, folks,
Speaker 1: that's gonna do it for this one. If you'd like
Speaker 1: to contact me, you can do that at Bobby Capuci
Speaker 1: at ProtonMail dot com. That's bo bb Y c A.
Speaker 1: P u Cci at ProtonMail dot com. You can also
Speaker 1: find me on Twitter at Bobby underscore c ap u Cci.
Speaker 1: The link that I discussed can be found in the
Speaker 1: description box.