Speaker 1: I downloaded the amp on my phone.
Speaker 2: I can listen whatever I want at fifty five KARC
Speaker 2: dot com at O five, a fifty five rc DE
Speaker 2: talk station of very very Happy Tuesday Jam always made
Speaker 2: special because at this moment in time, every Tuesday at
Speaker 2: A eight o five we get to hear from Breitbart
Speaker 2: and get the inside scoop. Breitbart bookmark at b R
Speaker 2: E I T b a art dot com. You're gonna
Speaker 2: have the book mark. You have to go there directly,
Speaker 2: because if you try to copy and post one of
Speaker 2: the wonderfully written articles filled with fun filled factual information
Speaker 2: from legitimate reporters and put it on a social media site,
Speaker 2: no one's ever gonna see it, right, Joel Paullocke, Breitbart
Speaker 2: editor at Lard's always great to have you on the show,
Speaker 2: my friend, good to have you back. I tell people
Speaker 2: to do that all the time, and I've had my
Speaker 2: own experiences, like with Facebook. If I put a bright
Speaker 2: Bart thing up, I'll get five hundred people responding to
Speaker 2: a happy or happy Friday post that I'll put up,
Speaker 2: or a picture of my dog, Joel. But if I
Speaker 2: put a Breitbart article up, boy, it's no one sees it.
Speaker 2: So the social media algorithms are hard at work, but
Speaker 2: you guys do a great job. And a fun headline
Speaker 2: for me to start off with, Joel Paul Eck since
Speaker 2: we're going to talk about who really has the momentum,
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris or Donald Trump. I love this headline was
Speaker 2: obviously a joke. Kamala to announce policy positions just as
Speaker 2: soon as the polls tell her what they are.
Speaker 1: We don't.
Speaker 2: I mean, they're trying to I mean they're trying to
Speaker 2: whitewash every but we know what her policy positions are.
Speaker 2: Look at twenty nineteen, what she ran on for president
Speaker 2: the United States of America, and look at the last
Speaker 2: three and a half years of the Biden administration, right.
Speaker 3: Well, she had the most left wing policies of any
Speaker 3: US senator in the Senate in twenty nineteen, which was
Speaker 3: a year when she was angling to run for president,
Speaker 3: So we knew what her policy positions are or have been.
Speaker 3: And then of course in the White House in the
Speaker 3: administration as Vice President, she has had the same policies
Speaker 3: as Joe Biden, so much so that often the White
Speaker 3: House referred to the administration as the Biden Harris administration.
Speaker 1: When they announced the ration policy, for example, the one
Speaker 1: that she's running away.
Speaker 3: From, they called it the Biden Harris policy, and they
Speaker 3: did so for years since twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1: So we know what her.
Speaker 3: Policies are, but she refuses to state them, and she's
Speaker 3: trying to distance herself from the failing policies, the ones
Speaker 3: that are most obviously bad. And as of right now,
Speaker 3: let's pull this up right now, get on to her website.
Speaker 1: No policies on the website.
Speaker 3: So more than three weeks after joining the race, she
Speaker 3: has not stated in any policy positions. And look, there's
Speaker 3: a strategy to this, because often you'll find that specific
Speaker 3: candidates are less popular than what we call it a
Speaker 3: generic Democrat or a generic Republican who appeals in theory
Speaker 3: to their party's voters. She's running as generic Democrat, and
Speaker 3: that's why she's doing well, because Joe Biden was pulling
Speaker 3: very far below a generic Democrat. That is to say,
Speaker 3: there are many Democrats who knew he was subpar, he
Speaker 3: was not good, he was not capable, and they wanted
Speaker 3: to run or they wanted to vote for someone else.
Speaker 3: And so she's just casting herself right now as someone else.
Speaker 3: She knows that most voters don't know her policies, don't
Speaker 3: remember her failed presidential run, and she wants to get
Speaker 3: away with being the candidate in the abstract who theoretically
Speaker 3: they might like to vote for. And that's what she's
Speaker 3: doing for Democrats. It's not going to help her with
Speaker 3: independent voters, it's not going to help her win any
Speaker 3: Republican voters over, but it is going to help her
Speaker 3: consolidate Democratic support.
Speaker 2: Well, And I wanted to get your reaction to the
Speaker 2: mainstream media's efforts to recharacterize her obviously ignoring what she
Speaker 2: has been on record in favor of again twenty nineteen
Speaker 2: of the policies she ran for in her failed effort
Speaker 2: to become president. But let's just use one illustration. She's
Speaker 2: not the borders are. She was not responsible for the
Speaker 2: southern border. She was responsible for you know, Central American
Speaker 2: policy and changing the you know, decades long, if not
Speaker 2: longer dynamic that led them to their inept reality of
Speaker 2: their governmental system and their failed economic realities which are
Speaker 2: forcing people out. So no, that's what she was charged
Speaker 2: to do. You would really have to be I mean,
Speaker 2: I always refer to my listeners as we dwellers. Politically,
Speaker 2: we're all on top of things. We remember this, we
Speaker 2: know what she is. We study the news, we study
Speaker 2: politics all the time. But is the mainstream media's effort
Speaker 2: to recharacterize her and deny outright deny that she had
Speaker 2: any connection with the failed border policies? Is that their
Speaker 2: admission or acknowledgment that they think we're a bunch of
Speaker 2: idiots who don't pay attention to anything, Joel, I know
Speaker 2: that sounds like a weird question, but I'm kind of worried.
Speaker 2: They put their credibility on the line when they say
Speaker 2: stuff like that, and I know what the words are.
Speaker 1: I just uttered.
Speaker 2: But that seems to me to suggest that the mainstream
Speaker 2: media really does think the American people are a bunch
Speaker 2: of easily manipulated idiots.
Speaker 1: They do, and they think they are very smart.
Speaker 3: So they think that they can do a better job
Speaker 3: than the Kamala Harris campaign of explaining away these unhelpful details.
Speaker 3: But I've looked at the record and look, the story
Speaker 3: they don't want to tell is this, Kamala Harris was
Speaker 3: placed in charge of what they call root causes of migration.
Speaker 3: There's actually an executive order in twenty twenty one called
Speaker 3: the root Causes strategy, and at that time the migrants
Speaker 3: were largely coming from three countries, from Nicaragua, from Honduras,
Speaker 3: and from Al Salvador. So they developed this Northern Triangle strategy,
Speaker 3: and they put her in charge of the root causes.
Speaker 3: So she was going to go and talk to the
Speaker 3: leaders of these countries. Excuse me, I said, Nicaragua, Guatemala.
Speaker 3: But anyway, those were the three countries, and the problem
Speaker 3: was that the immigration crisis, the migration problem, ballooned so
Speaker 3: far beyond those three countries that within a few months
Speaker 3: or so, it became ridiculous to talk about those countries
Speaker 3: as the.
Speaker 1: Source of the problem. So that's what they don't want
Speaker 1: to talk about.
Speaker 3: They don't want to talk about the fact that this
Speaker 3: whole idea of root causes was bogus.
Speaker 1: And that the real cause, the real driver.
Speaker 3: Of migration, was the fact that migrants and the cartels
Speaker 3: knew that there was going to be no enforcement at
Speaker 3: the southern border of the United States. So that's that's
Speaker 3: the problem, and they don't want to admit, and that
Speaker 3: there was no need.
Speaker 2: To be made off of farrying people in return for
Speaker 2: large payments to the United States southern border where they
Speaker 2: knew they were going to gain access, whether it's for
Speaker 2: some sort of nefarious purpose like terrorists, Chinese Communist Party
Speaker 2: military age men, or alternatively, people fleeing terrible economic situations,
Speaker 2: which is not a justification to enter our country illegally.
Speaker 2: That word got out all over the globe.
Speaker 3: Right, So I want to acknowledge that was a failure,
Speaker 3: complete failure. And you know, they're trying to say, well,
Speaker 3: she was just in charge of those three countries and
Speaker 3: the root causes and so forth. But you know, that
Speaker 3: doesn't really solve the problem for them, because they really
Speaker 3: believed that if they well I don't.
Speaker 1: Know if they actually believed that.
Speaker 3: They were just trying to sell it to the public,
Speaker 3: the idea that if you talked about the root causes,
Speaker 3: which were corruption in those countries, poverty in those countries,
Speaker 3: if you talked about those three countries, that would solve
Speaker 3: the problem.
Speaker 1: They thought they could get away.
Speaker 3: With not enforcing the border, not enforcing the immigration law.
Speaker 3: And it doesn't get her out of this problem, which
Speaker 3: is that she was placed in a key position of
Speaker 3: responsibility for the migration problem, and they called it again
Speaker 3: they called the entire policy, not just the root causes part.
Speaker 3: They called the entire policy the Biden Harris immigration policy.
Speaker 3: This was her project, this was her baby, and she
Speaker 3: ran away from it eventually during the administration before she
Speaker 3: became a candidate because she didn't want to be associated
Speaker 3: with a failure and she was not willing to stand
Speaker 3: up to Joe Biden on the non enforcement of border policy,
Speaker 3: on the non enforcement of existing immigration law. So yeah,
Speaker 3: they think that we are easily manipulable idiots. I think
Speaker 3: that they know that some percentage of Democrats want to
Speaker 3: be convinced. So it's not that they know Democrats are stupid.
Speaker 3: They just know that these Democrats will twist their brains
Speaker 3: into pretzels to rationalize voting for Kamala Harris. And they
Speaker 3: just need to give those voters enough of a story
Speaker 3: that they could pretend to believe.
Speaker 1: So that's what's happened.
Speaker 3: And you know, you can point out things like this,
Speaker 3: you can point out Tim Wallace's stolen valor his puffery,
Speaker 3: his false statements about his military record and so forth, it's.
Speaker 1: Not going to shake those voters.
Speaker 3: They're just excited to vote for a Democrat who isn't
Speaker 3: Joe Biden, and so they're willing to believe and to
Speaker 3: convince themselves of anything. I had this experience recently when
Speaker 3: some one wrote to me, and this is a person
Speaker 3: who understands Israel policy pretty well, a Democrat. They understand
Speaker 3: Israel policy, they understand that Kamala Harris is terrible for Israel.
Speaker 3: But they said, well, I'm still going to vote for
Speaker 3: Harris because I've decided it doesn't matter whose president. Every
Speaker 3: president's going to have the same policy, which is garbage.
Speaker 1: But you cant'll it. You can see them rationalizing it.
Speaker 3: They don't want to bring and you know what, it's
Speaker 3: very hard for people to change their minds when they've
Speaker 3: demonized the other side so much. I don't think Republicans
Speaker 3: have as much of a problem crossing over occasionally to
Speaker 3: vote for a good Democrat. But Democrats really they think
Speaker 3: of Republicans as racist and greedy and terrible and Nazis
Speaker 3: and whatever. You can't join a group that you've demonized
Speaker 3: so much, especially after you've been the one sort of
Speaker 3: alienating people in your own family.
Speaker 1: Let's say.
Speaker 3: So, you know, look, this is a problem, and Trump
Speaker 3: is getting drowned out in all of this.
Speaker 1: You know, there's a lot of hoopla around the new candidate.
Speaker 3: I think it's partly media biased, but it's also just
Speaker 3: partly something new. Voters are excited by, something new, they're
Speaker 3: interested looking. And one of the reasons I wrote my
Speaker 3: book the Agenda, was to give Trump something to talk about,
Speaker 3: give him a vision of the future that he can
Speaker 3: talk about two Republican voters and say, look, this is
Speaker 3: what it's going to look like when I win. And
Speaker 3: I don't have to wait for Congress to agree. I
Speaker 3: don't have to wait for all these appointees to be
Speaker 3: in place. I'm not giving you some massive, nine hundred
Speaker 3: and twenty two page tome like Project twenty five of
Speaker 3: everything conservatives ever want to do. I'm just giving you
Speaker 3: a very quick agenda list of things I can do
Speaker 3: as president by executive order. And that's why I wrote
Speaker 3: the agenda, and I think that's what Trump has to
Speaker 3: talk about to counter all of this stuff about Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2: And I'm glad you brought up the agenda what Trump
Speaker 2: should do in his first one on a day, because
Speaker 2: what we need to do is get Trump in office
Speaker 2: before he can exercise any of the thoughts and ideas
Speaker 2: that you express in your book, as wonderful as they are.
Speaker 2: But he is, I mean, Trump's just getting an earful
Speaker 2: from every conservative commentator that you can find, including you know, me,
Speaker 2: a little libertarian commentator. Nonetheless, don't talk about Kama Harris's
Speaker 2: crowd size, don't talk about her accent, don't talk about
Speaker 2: her race. None of these things matter. If the independent
Speaker 2: voter is out there really trying to make some sense
Speaker 2: of who he wants to vote for or she wants
Speaker 2: to vote for, then you're going to need to talk
Speaker 2: about policy. And he is winning across the board in
Speaker 2: terms of policy positions, from the board of the economy, inflation.
Speaker 2: He's got a multitude of things he can campaign on
Speaker 2: that don't have to go down to the low hanging
Speaker 2: fruit about you know, her gaps or mistakes or a
Speaker 2: goofy giggle or anything else for that matter.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, and she is going to avoid the media.
Speaker 3: She's not going to talk about what she believes. We
Speaker 3: have a convention coming up in Chicago next week, the
Speaker 3: worst possible city for a Democratic convention because it shows
Speaker 3: just how badly Democrats have done in running Chicago. You know,
Speaker 3: in nineteen ninety six when Bill Clinton had his convention there,
Speaker 3: it was a successful, thriving city. It had a lot
Speaker 3: of hope, and since then it's really gone down the drain.
Speaker 3: And you can see all the results of no cash
Speaker 3: bail and high taxes and defunding the police, and poor education,
Speaker 3: letting the unions run everything. It's just a disaster of
Speaker 3: a city. But they're not going to want to talk
Speaker 3: about that. They're going to talk about the beautiful buildings
Speaker 3: and the lakefront, you know, the things that have existed
Speaker 3: in Chicago for decades, and.
Speaker 1: That's exactly how they're going to try to run Kamala Harris.
Speaker 3: They're going to talk about the historic nature of her presidency,
Speaker 3: and they're going to.
Speaker 1: Talk about how she exudes joy now, her nuclear class,
Speaker 1: the joy out. They're not going.
Speaker 3: To talk about the job she would do as president
Speaker 3: and the job she has done is vice president, which
Speaker 3: has been a terrible job. So Trump can't control with
Speaker 3: the media are going to say, and we can, you know,
Speaker 3: we consider and complain about it, and we will. But
Speaker 3: I think the most important thing is for Trump to
Speaker 3: get the conversation back to policy, because that's where he
Speaker 3: beats her.
Speaker 1: Aim.
Speaker 3: She lost in twenty she lost in twenty nineteen, twenty
Speaker 3: twenty because she couldn't talk about her policies.
Speaker 1: Trump's got to talk about his. He has a track record.
Speaker 1: Andy has good.
Speaker 3: Ideas for the future. And I think that's that's what
Speaker 3: you need to talk about. And that's what I'd like
Speaker 3: to turn the conversation to. And I talk about the
Speaker 3: agenda exactly.
Speaker 2: The jenda What Trump should do in is First One
Speaker 2: and a Day is authored by my guest today, Joe
Speaker 2: Paul Locke, Breitbart Editor at Large for The Insight Scoop
Speaker 2: this morning. I guess I'm curious to know have you
Speaker 2: sent a copy of your book to the Trump administer
Speaker 2: or to the Trump campaign. I'd like to think that
Speaker 2: he got himself a copy.
Speaker 1: Of this and no, but one is on the way.
Speaker 2: One is on the way. Wonderful, wonderful, easy to digest.
Speaker 2: I'll recommend my listeners get a copy. It's available ever
Speaker 2: books were sold. I can have my executive producer, Jos
Speaker 2: trek Or put your book as a link on my
Speaker 2: blog page at fifty five krec dot com so we
Speaker 2: can all get a hold of it and read it
Speaker 2: and maybe talk policy amongst our friends with some of
Speaker 2: your ideas in the agenda. Joe Pollock, it's always a
Speaker 2: pleasure having on the program. I appreciate the work you're
Speaker 2: doing at Brightbart along with everybody else at bright Birth.
Speaker 2: That's why I recommend my listeners go ahead and Bookmarket
Speaker 2: because you find some really solid, solid reporting there and
Speaker 2: of course outside of the legacy media. Joel, thanks for
Speaker 2: your time today. As always, I hope you have a
Speaker 2: wonderful week, my friend. We'll talk again soon, I hope.
Speaker 1: Thanks, and thanks for the opportunity.
Speaker 2: Anytime, my friend, anytime eight nineteen fifty five kre see
Speaker 2: detalk station. Imaging can be affordable, but just don't go
Speaker 2: to the hospital imaging department where you're going to shell
Speaker 2: out thousands of dollars. It just, you know, it just
Speaker 2: irks me when I mean, every time I do a
Speaker 2: commercial for affordable imaging services just blows my mind. And
Speaker 2: you know I've been down this path before myself. CT
Speaker 2: scans can be five grand. Echo cardiograms can cost you
Speaker 2: two three four thousand dollars. Ultrasound same thing, MRIs thirty
Speaker 2: five hundred dollars plus multiple bills, not just one bill.
Speaker 2: You get a separate bill beyond the thirty five hundred
Speaker 2: dollars for the MRI or any other scan, because they're
Speaker 2: going to get a radiologist that has to do a
Speaker 2: review of the scans to provide to your doctor so
Speaker 2: you know what's going on on the image. That's what
Speaker 2: a board certified radiologist does. And you need a report
Speaker 2: all of it, thousands of dollars, and your slice of
Speaker 2: the action is probably going to be more after your
Speaker 2: insurance payment if you have it, more than the whole
Speaker 2: thing costs that Affordable Imaging services.
Speaker 1: Oh my god, doctor didn't tell me to go there.
Speaker 2: No other doctor's not going to tell you to go
Speaker 2: there because you're going to save heap loads of money,
Speaker 2: and the massive profit center that is the hospital system
Speaker 2: that owns your doctor's practice is not going to get
Speaker 2: the benefit of that giant bill. Echo cardigram four hundred
Speaker 2: ninety five bucks CT scan with a contrast six hundred
Speaker 2: without four point fifty MRI with a contrast the most
Speaker 2: expensive image you can get at affordable. It's six hundred
Speaker 2: and forty five bucks at every image including ultrasounds and
Speaker 2: the long screens come with a board certified radiologist report
Speaker 2: is included in this low low price, So save yourself
Speaker 2: tons of money. Go where you want because it's your
Speaker 2: medical care and you have that choice five one three seven,
Speaker 2: five three eight thousand, five one three seven, five three
Speaker 2: eight thousand. Online you'll find them at Affordable Medimaging dot
Speaker 2: com fifty five KRC For more information about contests on
Speaker 2: this