Speaker 1: Alrighty diedie, can you imagine? Let's imagine a world where
Speaker 1: there's no hypocrisy and where we all agree on the basics.
Speaker 1: Is that something you think we can do? We're gonna
Speaker 1: try today on the Correl Cast right here for this.
Speaker 2: Tuesday, uncensored, unfiltered, un hinged. It's the Cuell Cast. Listen
Speaker 2: daily on your favorite streaming service.
Speaker 1: It is the Crell Cast. I am Carrel, so very
Speaker 1: glad you are joining me on this Tuesday, February something,
Speaker 1: or rather eleventh. Can you imagine? That's the game we're
Speaker 1: gonna be playing today. And by the way, if you're
Speaker 1: watching us on Instagram or TikTok, it's amazing. I'm trying
Speaker 1: to use a new software program called restream. I don't
Speaker 1: know if it's working. I don't know if you're seeing
Speaker 1: this on YouTube. I don't know any I just know
Speaker 1: that I am here Michigan. Nob hey there you are.
Speaker 1: So something's working, all right? So can you imagine? You know,
Speaker 1: last night I got a case of the can you imagine?
Speaker 1: Can you imagine? And so I thought today we'd have
Speaker 1: some fun with that. Now, let's work from a premise
Speaker 1: that Orangina and Maga his followers that we can find
Speaker 1: some common ground. Okay, let's start. Can you imagine a
Speaker 1: world in which we could find common ground with Maga
Speaker 1: and with Orangina. Now, I will tell you, I believe
Speaker 1: there is a ship just a crap of government waste. Okay,
Speaker 1: I believe that, and I have seen it firsthand. And
Speaker 1: I know that you, my loyal listeners and loyal viewers,
Speaker 1: I know that you feel the same way too, that
Speaker 1: there is a ton of government waste. So can you
Speaker 1: imagine that we actually agree with Maga and Donald Trump
Speaker 1: or Orangina as I call him, on that premise that
Speaker 1: there is a ton of government waste. So I am
Speaker 1: not against streamlining the federal government to make it work better,
Speaker 1: because we all can agree that it has gotten a
Speaker 1: bit out of control, a bit cumbersome. It takes too
Speaker 1: long to deal with the federal government. Okay. So can
Speaker 1: you imagine that we agree on that principle that there
Speaker 1: is too much government waste? That we've all heard about
Speaker 1: the fifty thousand dollars hammers and the you know, the
Speaker 1: five hundred dollars toilet seats. So there is a lot
Speaker 1: of government waste now, and I am all for trimming
Speaker 1: the fat. If there are agencies that are either redundant
Speaker 1: or agencies that just you know, half the employees don't
Speaker 1: do much, whatever the case, Okay, I'm there. I'm with you.
Speaker 1: I'm with you, Orangina, I'm with you. Elon. If if
Speaker 1: there are truly agencies that just don't serve the public good,
Speaker 1: their whole purpose is just to be there, sure, let's
Speaker 1: talk about eliminating them. Let's talk about whittling them down,
Speaker 1: let's talk about cutting their funding. I'm all for that.
Speaker 1: The problem is that I don't agree with the agencies
Speaker 1: that they think are superfluous. Okay. Now, I don't know
Speaker 1: much about USAAID. I don't they're picking the low hanging
Speaker 1: fruit right now to get rid of. Okay, and you know,
Speaker 1: I don't know a lot of what those agencies do.
Speaker 1: But it seems to me, And if you're MAGA and
Speaker 1: you're watching, let's see if we can agree on this.
Speaker 1: It seems to me they should not start by cutting
Speaker 1: agencies that provide services to people, Okay, to humans. Now, look,
Speaker 1: there's a ton of government waste when it comes to
Speaker 1: corporate subsidies. I don't think we should be bailing out
Speaker 1: any corporation. If your corporation and you can't make it,
Speaker 1: and the economy or COVID or whatever it might be, buy,
Speaker 1: We've got enough corporation. So I don't believe in corporate welfare.
Speaker 1: So if I were streamlining the government, the first thing
Speaker 1: I would do is to look at how much corporate
Speaker 1: welfare can we cut. Now, I'm not talking about aid
Speaker 1: to farmers. I'm not talking about anything like that. I'm
Speaker 1: talking about giving billions of dollars to companies that already
Speaker 1: have billions of dollars. So that is the first thing
Speaker 1: that I would look at. What about this, though, What
Speaker 1: does Elon and orangina uh plan to do with the
Speaker 1: money that they're saving from their quote dismantling of the
Speaker 1: federal government. Where is that money going to go? Why
Speaker 1: do they want us to save billions or trillions of dollars?
Speaker 1: What do they want to do with that money? Now?
Speaker 1: I don't care if you're maga or not. Do you
Speaker 1: think they're going to put it in your pocket? Do
Speaker 1: you think they're going to use that money to reinvest
Speaker 1: in America? Do you I mean do you do you
Speaker 1: think they're going to build better roads? Do you think
Speaker 1: they're going to build new bridges. Do you think they're
Speaker 1: gonna build high speed train infrastructure? Do you think they're
Speaker 1: going to start making services more affordable or even free?
Speaker 1: Like energy? If we're producing so much energy, why are
Speaker 1: you and I paying so much for a light built
Speaker 1: Other countries provide energy for their people. So what do
Speaker 1: you think they're going to do with all this cash
Speaker 1: that they might be cutting from these federal programs? Do
Speaker 1: you believe for a minute that they're going to give
Speaker 1: it back to you? Now, look, anyone that's dealt with
Speaker 1: a public program, Social Security, welfare, Medicaid, you know that
Speaker 1: all of these are underfunded, understaffed, have way too much bureaucracy,
Speaker 1: don't pay you what you actually need to live. Our
Speaker 1: seniors are not getting enough money, you know, to live on.
Speaker 1: If you're on disability, you're certainly not getting enough money.
Speaker 1: If you're on Medicaid, not enough of your bills are covered.
Speaker 1: You know, this morning I was going through my debt,
Speaker 1: which is fifty two thousand dollars, that's how much I
Speaker 1: have out in debt, and I thought, how did you
Speaker 1: rack this up? Do you know in the last five
Speaker 1: years I spent over twenty thousand dollars on medical expenses,
Speaker 1: and I have Medicare. Just next week a heart scan's
Speaker 1: gonna cost me two hundred and forty dollars my dental
Speaker 1: work thirteen hundred this time, twelve hundred for this one,
Speaker 1: eleven hundred for this one. So I agree that we
Speaker 1: could cut governments, you know, spending. Can you imagine I'd
Speaker 1: agree with MAGA and Orangina. I just disagree in where
Speaker 1: and where that money's going to go. Because if you
Speaker 1: can save billions on corporate profits, how about making schools better?
Speaker 1: Instead of getting rid of the Department of Education, how
Speaker 1: about actually teaching kids stuff they're gonna need for the
Speaker 1: new millennium AI. How about you know, teaching them some
Speaker 1: morals too, some civics, you know, how to how to
Speaker 1: function with a government. How about that? But do you
Speaker 1: think for a minute, that's where the money's gonna go?
Speaker 1: You know? You see, I think if we put aside
Speaker 1: all the hatred that we can see there is some
Speaker 1: shared interest with MAGA, you know, calling them all Nazis
Speaker 1: and everything. Yeah, it's fun whatever, But truly, I really
Speaker 1: believe that they want to cut federal government. I do,
Speaker 1: and I agree with them. That there are certain areas
Speaker 1: of federal government. I would cut defense, you know, and
Speaker 1: when I say defense, I'm including Israel. There's no reason
Speaker 1: for us to own Gaza. We don't need to spend
Speaker 1: one dollar on Gaza when we have a country with
Speaker 1: homeless people out of control, with food that's unaffordable, with
Speaker 1: people that can't afford housing. We have things that we
Speaker 1: could spend money on in this country as opposed to
Speaker 1: Ukraine or in Israel. And I'm not saying we shouldn't
Speaker 1: support Ukraine. I'm not saying we shouldn't support Israel. I'm
Speaker 1: simply saying that there are things in this country that
Speaker 1: we all need. We all need lower food prices. We
Speaker 1: all need affordable mortgage rates and mortgage assystems to get
Speaker 1: into our first home. We all need more and higher
Speaker 1: disability payments, sell us A security payments, Medicaid payments. But
Speaker 1: is that where the money is going to go? Can
Speaker 1: you imagine if we could just agree on that one principle. Yes,
Speaker 1: let's cut in restructions, but let's use it for good
Speaker 1: instead of billionaire tax rates. Want to support the corel Cast,
Speaker 1: then like and subscribe the YouTube videos at the really
Speaker 1: Correl channel. Just go to YouTube dot com forward slash
Speaker 1: really Correll, that's Kril, and subscribe to the most exciting
Speaker 1: YouTube stream available today.
Speaker 2: If you're not visiting really corell dot com daily, you're
Speaker 2: missing out. Get the podcast videos and the blug including
Speaker 2: recipes at reallycorrel dot com.
Speaker 1: All right, I just read in the chat room someone
Speaker 1: said Bill Maher said the Department of Education needs to go.
Speaker 1: As far as I'm concerned, Bill Maher needs to go.
Speaker 1: Bill Maher used to be witty and relevant and funny.
Speaker 1: He used to be the progressive atheist that would just
Speaker 1: say anything to anybody. He used to be someone that
Speaker 1: spoke the truth and was not skewed. And then he
Speaker 1: became a millionaire and suddenly he's a Republican. You know,
Speaker 1: Bill Maher needs to shut the f up because he's
Speaker 1: rich and ignorant nowadays. I think all the alcohol and
Speaker 1: cannabis has affected his brain. And I say that disappointingly.
Speaker 1: He used to be an idol. When I met him
Speaker 1: and did his show, I was gobsmacked. I thought, oh
Speaker 1: my god, it's my hero. I want, you know, I
Speaker 1: want to be him. This is the gig I want
Speaker 1: right here. And then of late when you hear his
Speaker 1: just obtuse and ridiculous views the Department of Education. Now
Speaker 1: let's just start with that. What would Can you imagine
Speaker 1: a world where we all agree that kids, first of all,
Speaker 1: need not be shot at school. Okay, that's the first thing.
Speaker 1: Second of all, that they receive an actual education they
Speaker 1: can use. Where they learn how to read, how to write,
Speaker 1: where they learn how to yes and I mean rite,
Speaker 1: Where they learn how to use AI, where they learn
Speaker 1: how to cook, cook, yes, cook, and what foods they
Speaker 1: should and should not be eating. Where they learn how
Speaker 1: to grocery shop, where they learn about stocks and bonds
Speaker 1: and crypto. Imagine a curriculum where a student comes out
Speaker 1: actually educated enough to not need college, to be able
Speaker 1: to leave the American education system. A fully educated member
Speaker 1: of society who understands civics, who understands history, art literature,
Speaker 1: who knows how to write, who knows how to read,
Speaker 1: who knows how to critically think and do math problems,
Speaker 1: who knows how to use AI, who knows how to
Speaker 1: keep abreast of technology, and that prioritizes physical fitness and
Speaker 1: mental well being. Imagine so getting rid of the Department
Speaker 1: of Education is not the answer. Giving the Department of
Speaker 1: Education new priorities is the answer. Not tying funding of
Speaker 1: a school to the test results of that school, because
Speaker 1: then the teachers just teach to a test. Imagine teachers
Speaker 1: that don't have to spend their meager salary on school
Speaker 1: supplies for their children. Imagine teachers who are paid well
Speaker 1: enough to live a comfortable life over one hundred thousand
Speaker 1: a year each teacher. Imagine that, why wouldn't we pay
Speaker 1: a teacher as much as a football player gets to
Speaker 1: play in the Super Bowl? Aren't they the keepers of
Speaker 1: our future? Didn't Whitney say, I believe the children are
Speaker 1: our future. Teach them well and let them lead the way.
Speaker 1: We're not teaching them well, We're not showing them all
Speaker 1: the beauty they possess inside. Stop being concerned about drag
Speaker 1: queens reading your kid a book, and be more concerned
Speaker 1: that your kid probably can't read the book themselves. Think
Speaker 1: about that. Stop worrying about whether or not they're being
Speaker 1: gender affirming or whether or not they're being pro lgbt
Speaker 1: because your son or daughter might happen to be LGBTQ.
Speaker 1: Stop worrying about that, and worry if they know how
Speaker 1: to freaking boil water, how to cook for themselves, how
Speaker 1: to feed themselves, what food they should be eating, what
Speaker 1: they should be doing to make sure the planet doesn't
Speaker 1: go away? Yes see, Can you imagine? Can you imagine
Speaker 1: that I agree with MAGA that we need to do
Speaker 1: something about the Department of Education. I just don't think
Speaker 1: we need to do what they think. Do you see
Speaker 1: a theme? We agree with a lot of the principles
Speaker 1: of MAGA. We really do. And progressives don't want to
Speaker 1: admit that, but we really do. We want to see
Speaker 1: reform to the Department of Education. We just want to
Speaker 1: see it reformed differently. We want them to actually teach
Speaker 1: things to our children, to make schools safe from shootings
Speaker 1: through good gun control. We want to actually make our
Speaker 1: children come out informed and educated, not indoctrinated into some
Speaker 1: political theme, but actually educated so they can choose candidates
Speaker 1: for themselves. Can you imagine? Can you imagine? Jd Vance
Speaker 1: said yesterday, by the way, where is he? Did someone
Speaker 1: kidnap jd Vance? I mean, do we need to send
Speaker 1: out a search party for him? Because it appears to
Speaker 1: me that Elon is Orangina's vice president, And if I
Speaker 1: were jd Vance I'd be a little bit jealous because
Speaker 1: it appears that Elon's getting all the love and jd
Speaker 1: Vance is like, where back in the back in the Appalachia,
Speaker 1: where has he been kidnapped? You know what? What's going
Speaker 1: on with him? Because you ain't seeing any of him.
Speaker 1: But he did make a statement yesterday. I don't know
Speaker 1: where or how, because I think they're keeping him locked
Speaker 1: in the White House basement, but he made a statement
Speaker 1: that the White House doesn't have to obey court orders.
Speaker 1: So Donald Trump's Orangina's executive orders are being challenged in court,
Speaker 1: and judges are stopping some of what he's doing, and
Speaker 1: they're saying, oh, we don't have to obey judges. Now.
Speaker 1: If you are maga, Joe Blow, I just want you
Speaker 1: to imagine Kamala Harris or Hillary Clinton or Joe Biden
Speaker 1: when he was vice president. I just want you to
Speaker 1: imagine a Democrat saying that a democratic president doesn't have
Speaker 1: to obey the courts. Can you imagine? Can you imagine
Speaker 1: how your little maga heads would have exploded if any
Speaker 1: Democrat came forward and said, nah, ignore the courts. We
Speaker 1: don't agree with their rulings. We think the judge is
Speaker 1: an ideologue. We're just not going to pay attention to
Speaker 1: their ruling. Can you imagine what the right would have
Speaker 1: done under Obama, under Biden if Kamala Harris had said, well,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden doesn't have to obey the courts. Can you imagine?
Speaker 1: So the hypocrisy. And if you're a magat, you have
Speaker 1: to admiture a hypocrite. You have to, you know, because
Speaker 1: you are. You only want what the courts do to
Speaker 1: if it's against your enemy. If the court rules against
Speaker 1: the Democrat, how aluyjah to the court. I love the court.
Speaker 1: The courts are the best. If the court rules against
Speaker 1: your guys, suddenly the judges must be replaced. The courts
Speaker 1: are no good, No, no, no, that's hypocrisy. I don't
Speaker 1: mind you having a different political view. I do mind
Speaker 1: you being a hypocrite about it. So don't give Orngina
Speaker 1: a pass on anything that you wouldn't give a democrat
Speaker 1: a pass on, because otherwise you will be a hypocrite. Okay,
Speaker 1: So can you imagine a Democratic vice president saying that
Speaker 1: his president did not need to obey court orders? Heads
Speaker 1: would explode. Lindsey Graham might even turn straight. You know.
Speaker 1: Can you imagine? So here we have a country that
Speaker 1: is divided, yet not I think all the country would
Speaker 1: agree that the federal governments out of control. Spending is
Speaker 1: out of control because it's not making it down to
Speaker 1: the people. Okay, we're spending a fortune on government. We
Speaker 1: don't have universal health care, we don't have fabulous roads,
Speaker 1: we don't have a fabulous energy infrastructure. You know, we
Speaker 1: don't have it. We're becoming a third world nation, and
Speaker 1: yet we're spending a fortune on government. So I think
Speaker 1: we all would agree that government should be trimmed down.
Speaker 1: I think we just disagree. How can you imagine if
Speaker 1: we could just get to a point of some agreements,
Speaker 1: like even at forget the track, queen, get the tram,
Speaker 1: just try to find common ground. Can you imagine? Or
Speaker 1: is it the impossible dream? Is it like to try it?
Speaker 1: Irel here and I'd like to take a moment to
Speaker 1: thank all the patrons at Patreon. Your support means the
Speaker 1: absolute world to me and the show. If you'd like
Speaker 1: to show your support for the crazy endeavors of the
Speaker 1: Corel Cast, then please go to Patreon dot com forward
Speaker 1: slash really Corell. That's patreon dot com. Forward Slash Really Corell,
Speaker 1: and please help get those numbers up by subscribing to
Speaker 1: the YouTube channel YouTube dot com Forward Slash Really Correl.
Speaker 1: There's so much great free content there, it's like having
Speaker 1: a network on your TV, phone or tablet. All social
Speaker 1: media is really Corel, including threads and Instagram, and don't
Speaker 1: forget the website that's had it all all along, Really
Speaker 1: Correl dot com. Without your support, the show simply doesn't work.
Speaker 1: So please listen on all streaming services, watch and subscribe
Speaker 1: on YouTube and suppor that's worth the show through Patreon
Speaker 1: at Patreon dot com. Forward Slash Really Correl. Thanks for
Speaker 1: almost thirty years of support for the loudest, craziest, most
Speaker 1: unhinged gay guy and his little dog. And let's keep
Speaker 1: the party going as long as we can. All right. So,
Speaker 1: I think I'm going out live on YouTube. I don't
Speaker 1: think it's doing TikTok or Instagram. I don't know why.
Speaker 1: I will try to figure that out for tomorrow and
Speaker 1: then see what I can do about that. You know,
Speaker 1: I tried. I'm trying. I paid for this fancy different
Speaker 1: program here and it doesn't seem to be working. Also,
Speaker 1: I'm not sure how I can answer anyone in the
Speaker 1: chat room. You know. So someone said in the chatroom,
Speaker 1: I hope the US Federal Marshalls go, and you know
Speaker 1: they're not going to. So the way it works, say
Speaker 1: the judge issues a ruler, if someone doesn't comply, they
Speaker 1: send the US Marshals out to get that person and
Speaker 1: hold them for contempt. The US Marshals are run by
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice, which is run by Donald J. Trump.
Speaker 1: So there is no way the federal marshals are going
Speaker 1: to show up and take JD. Vans or you know,
Speaker 1: take Trump and hold them for contempt. Not going to happen.
Speaker 1: So the judges orders are kind of useless. Now this
Speaker 1: is where we talk about the end of democracy. Okay,
Speaker 1: this is where we talk about the end of democracy
Speaker 1: because when a president the executives just remember this is
Speaker 1: all just about three branches of government. When the executive
Speaker 1: refuses to capitulate to the judicial okay, when they say, no,
Speaker 1: we're not going to follow the orders of the of
Speaker 1: the of the judges, either elected judges or appointed judges.
Speaker 1: When they say no, we're not going to do that,
Speaker 1: and then the Department of Justice refuses to enforce the
Speaker 1: verdicts from the judges. That's the end of democracy because
Speaker 1: then the three checks of government, the three branches of government,
Speaker 1: are no longer equal. The executive is not supposed to
Speaker 1: be more powerful than the legislative or the judicial. They're
Speaker 1: there to keep tabs on each other. Or in China
Speaker 1: doesn't want tabs. And he does control the Department of Justice.
Speaker 1: So the fact that he does means he is not
Speaker 1: going to allow himself, or Advance or anyone in his cabinet
Speaker 1: to suffer at all from the DOJ. That's just it's
Speaker 1: not going to happen. And that means that our government
Speaker 1: is broken, that there is a constitutional crisis, and I
Speaker 1: don't you know again, can you imagine a world where
Speaker 1: we can at least agree on the rule of law? Okay, listen, Maga,
Speaker 1: you can have your views, but you've got to at
Speaker 1: least admit there should be a rule of law. If
Speaker 1: a judge says something, it should be enforced. And you
Speaker 1: can't scream with the judge's partisan because guess what, Trump
Speaker 1: had nothing but partisan judges and he got off on
Speaker 1: multiple criminal offenses because the judges threw up roadblocks that
Speaker 1: shouldn't sit well with you, because you wouldn't like it
Speaker 1: if it was a democratic president that got off with
Speaker 1: a million things because the judges were in his pocket.
Speaker 1: If you don't like and this goes directly to the
Speaker 1: two or three MAGA people listening, if you don't like
Speaker 1: the United States system of government executive, legislative, judicial, then
Speaker 1: why are you here? Why are you here? If you
Speaker 1: don't like what judges do, if you only like it
Speaker 1: when they're on your side, then why are you here?
Speaker 1: Because that's not how America works. And as Orangina and
Speaker 1: Elon try to shape our country into a dictatorship, that
Speaker 1: should anger you because when they lose, and they will,
Speaker 1: or when they are deposed and they will be, history
Speaker 1: tells us that no form of government lasts forever. When
Speaker 1: they're thrown out, you're not going to like it. If
Speaker 1: the other side behaves like they do, you're not going
Speaker 1: to like it. If democrats begin to act like tyrants,
Speaker 1: you're not going to like it. So why do you
Speaker 1: advocate it now just because it's your guy. It's not
Speaker 1: always going to be your guy. That's the beauty of America.
Speaker 1: And even if he re is to leave, even if
Speaker 1: they try to change the Constitution for a third run.
Speaker 1: You know, King Louis, Other kings fell, Zar Nicholas of
Speaker 1: Russia shot in a basement, the French aristocracy, guillotine, Rome fell,
Speaker 1: Caesar stabbed on the Senate floor after proclaiming himself a god.
Speaker 1: So you shouldn't sit back and be so smug that
Speaker 1: you're in power now. You won't always be in power.
Speaker 1: How do I know? I study history? So can you
Speaker 1: imagine a world where you try to get what you
Speaker 1: want but legally? Legally? If a judge says no, you
Speaker 1: respect it, challenge the ruling, go to the Supreme whatever
Speaker 1: it takes. But to act like any party, or any
Speaker 1: candidate or any person is truly above the law. And
Speaker 1: why you have granted that status to this Orange part
Speaker 1: is beyond me. He should not be above the law.
Speaker 1: These judges are saying what he is doing is wrong.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry if you don't agree, But we have laws
Speaker 1: to make sure no president does what he's doing, and
Speaker 1: that includes democratic presidents. And as much as I'd like
Speaker 1: a Democrat to get in there and become a tyrant
Speaker 1: for good, we don't want tyrants. We don't want a king.
Speaker 1: We had the opportunity George Washington was told he could
Speaker 1: be president for a life. They all loved him. Everybody
Speaker 1: loved Washington, and they all said to him, look, you
Speaker 1: can be president for life. And he walked away. Washington
Speaker 1: was told he could serve more than two terms, and
Speaker 1: he walked away because he said, no, we just fought
Speaker 1: a king, We just fought a dictator. So you think
Speaker 1: that your guy is better than George Washington. You actually
Speaker 1: think that Orangina is superior to Jefferson, to Washington, to Adams,
Speaker 1: to Lincoln. This is the only president that has talked
Speaker 1: about destroying the constitution, the only one, and you seem
Speaker 1: to think that he's better than Eisenhower, Truman, Kennedy. He's not.
Speaker 1: He's not. So there's a lot of hypocrisy out there,
Speaker 1: and that's what angers you want to know what angers
Speaker 1: liberals most about MAGA, it's your hypocrisy. It's the fact
Speaker 1: that you condone behavior from your side that you would
Speaker 1: not condone from the other. That hypocrisy. You want to
Speaker 1: cut government, fine, so do we how about we sit
Speaker 1: down like rational people and decide, and how about ones
Speaker 1: it's cut and that money is there, we all determine
Speaker 1: that it's going to come back to us, not to Elon,
Speaker 1: not to the billionaires running the government. They're not going
Speaker 1: to give up money. Do you think the billionaires running
Speaker 1: the government are going to take this saved money and
Speaker 1: in some way give it back to you if you
Speaker 1: do your daft, you're just Craig Ray. All right, Well,
Speaker 1: tomorrow we're going to try to go live on TikTok
Speaker 1: and Instagram. It didn't work today. I don't know why
Speaker 1: I did it. I paid like I was supposed to
Speaker 1: and all of that and didn't work. So I'll try
Speaker 1: again tomorrow. I'll try to figure out how I can
Speaker 1: actually chat in the chat room at YouTube dot com,
Speaker 1: forward slash, really Carrell? Thank you on my patrons. I
Speaker 1: am carel be who you want to be from the
Speaker 1: hurry Body YouTube dot com Really Correll or Patreon dot com,
Speaker 1: Really Correl. We will feed you tomorrow, hopefully on more platforms.
Speaker 1: We'll figure it out. Their technical call great fabulou Can
Speaker 1: you imagine? Can you imagine something.
Speaker 2: About bloodcasting from a completely different point of view yours?
Speaker 2: Listen daily to the corel cast done your favorite streaming service.
Speaker 2: It's broadcasting from a completely different point of view yours
Speaker 2: listen daily to the corel Cast. Done your favorite streaming service,