Speaker 1: There it goes.
Speaker 2: There we go, Hello everybody, We are live. It is
Speaker 2: Bulletproof Wednesdays with our friend Dwyane from bulletproofpub dot com.
Speaker 2: Bulletproofpub dot com. Check it out. You're really gonna want
Speaker 2: to take a look at his videos where he is
Speaker 2: discussing on what was the name of that one? The
Speaker 2: Deep Share podcast right with Andy Rose? With Andy Rose,
Speaker 2: So the Deep Share podcast you're gonna look at, want
Speaker 2: to look at that. You're also gonna want to look
Speaker 2: at the blog of the Rise of the Expert. It's
Speaker 2: a twelve part series twelve.
Speaker 1: Right ten, but it could easily be twelve fifteen because
Speaker 1: there's more stuff to go.
Speaker 2: There's more to go, right, Yeah, And there's a lot
Speaker 2: about Louis Brandeis and what the hell happened to America
Speaker 2: is basically what I the way I look at it
Speaker 2: and how was it obsconced as they.
Speaker 1: Say in the old days, how is it comed right hijacked? Yeah,
Speaker 1: we use all those terminology.
Speaker 2: And just before we start, I just wanted to say
Speaker 2: there was a viewer, a listener to SFR slash FTJ
Speaker 2: Media who sent me this book by proxy, and there
Speaker 2: was a letter in here I don't think you want
Speaker 2: me to read this to the public. Just I'm getting
Speaker 2: that impression by the way it was written, but I
Speaker 2: believe it says Rachel from Carolina and Rachel from Carolina,
Speaker 2: thank you so much for the book. It's intriguing, it's
Speaker 2: making me, you know, it's curious. And I like the
Speaker 2: fact that they're talking about the Scythians, because, as I
Speaker 2: had mentioned before, it would be quite a damaging blow
Speaker 2: to their whole scheme should they find out that the
Speaker 2: Hellenistic era where they may have written the Torah, and
Speaker 2: they most certainly that was the first time it ever appeared,
Speaker 2: had stolen though it was stories and basically we wrote
Speaker 2: them in a more satirical, slanderous way. And that's why
Speaker 2: the ancient Greeks seems so strange, because they were trying
Speaker 2: to dismiss a Scythian past, which would indicate if there
Speaker 2: was ever age Zeus.
Speaker 1: Maybe he was a Sythian.
Speaker 2: Oh boy, yeah, okay. So that being said, how are
Speaker 2: you today, man?
Speaker 1: I'm really good. Couldn't be better. Really, everything's going well,
Speaker 1: and we're starting to see some cracks in the armor,
Speaker 1: or at least, you know, this idea of Frankism, this
Speaker 1: degeneracy that's been promoted in the West for over one
Speaker 1: hundred years, it's actually starting to leak out into the
Speaker 1: lexicon a little. And so, you know, last Wednesday we
Speaker 1: talked about where we showed the video with Candice Owens
Speaker 1: and we sort of broke that apart and showed how
Speaker 1: people are coming to this realization that maybe behind all
Speaker 1: of this degeneracy of the West is this cult anti
Speaker 1: religion that you and I know as Frankism from Jacob
Speaker 1: frank and so.
Speaker 2: Would disturb me about her and her I don't know
Speaker 2: what if she was playing cover. It was just really
Speaker 2: such a talking head that she couldn't confirm this. When
Speaker 2: there's an actual like interview where a guy wearing a
Speaker 2: small hat is talking to Lord the Rothschild, you know, Ball,
Speaker 2: the Rothschild, Lord Ball, right, the Rothschild, Jacob, and he's
Speaker 2: talking about the freakin' Balfour Declaration and how that was
Speaker 2: a big win for the Rothschild. How could she not
Speaker 2: say that, Oh, I can't confirm that the Rothschild has
Speaker 2: created at Israel?
Speaker 3: What right?
Speaker 4: What?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Yeah, we shared that on Facebook and yeah, that's
Speaker 1: him admitting to their involvement. And you know, when you
Speaker 1: look at the founding document of Israel to Balfour Declaration,
Speaker 1: it's addressed to a Rothschild. Yeah, that's right. And then
Speaker 1: a little bigger look and what we've indicated in part
Speaker 1: three brandeis you know, he was the international leader of Zionism,
Speaker 1: but he worked hand in hand with the House of
Speaker 1: ross Child in the in the implementation of the original
Speaker 1: not the original, but start in nineteen twenty they started
Speaker 1: establishing real infrastructure and brick and mortar buildings and brand
Speaker 1: eyes with the Palestine Economic Corporations, working hand in hand
Speaker 1: with the House of ross Child's Palestine Colonization Association, the
Speaker 1: Palestine Jewish Colonization Association PEACUP PICA is the abbreviation.
Speaker 2: And they were being taken in like welcomed at one
Speaker 2: point in the late late eighteen hundreds. There's actually, like,
Speaker 2: you know, hand real type of video that I've seen
Speaker 2: where they're you know, they're covering their face, they're walking away,
Speaker 2: they're already showing the attitude, but they're walking among much more.
Speaker 2: You know, I guess you could call them potentially Christian,
Speaker 2: potentially Muslims, but it's more of a it's more of
Speaker 2: a mix. Even though they're chrying to keep to themselves
Speaker 2: in their own little their own little hole in the wall,
Speaker 2: the penguins are trying to stick together.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So after realizing all of this Frankism, I've been
Speaker 1: reconsidering all of my work and all of the things
Speaker 1: that we know and all of the characters that have
Speaker 1: been important in you know, the history of propaganda. And
Speaker 1: you know, we look at Edward Burne's and so uh
Speaker 1: she she mentions or somebody in one of these videos mentions,
Speaker 1: and I haven't been able to confirm this for myself
Speaker 1: that Freud, Sigmund Freud was.
Speaker 2: Absolutely and half gay and wouldn't have sex with his wife.
Speaker 1: Okay, so then when you look at his double nephew,
Speaker 1: which you can't say about very many people. Edward Burne's
Speaker 1: that's the father of propaganda. He literally wrote the book Propaganda.
Speaker 1: I've gotten my shell here, and you know, talk about
Speaker 1: this group of the very first paragraph, page one. He
Speaker 1: talks about a group of people that is unseen behind
Speaker 1: you know, closed doors, and they shape our tastes and
Speaker 1: they make us think our thoughts.
Speaker 2: That could be one of three and you know references,
Speaker 2: it's either the Jesuits because we know that they're cryptos.
Speaker 2: It could be the Frankest because we know the Frankest
Speaker 2: and the Jesuits basically are what created the Perfectible List
Speaker 2: in slash Illuminati. Or it could be a direct reference
Speaker 2: to the Masonic Order. But you know it's really the same, same.
Speaker 1: They're all the same, yeah right, yeah, sure, it's.
Speaker 2: Like all their spies who spy on their own spies
Speaker 2: to keep everybody tight.
Speaker 1: Yep. And you know, we traced it all the way
Speaker 1: back to the enlightened absolutists, at least in sort of modernity.
Speaker 1: So we go back to you know, seventeen hundreds and
Speaker 1: this idea of governing society through the opinion of the technical,
Speaker 1: scientific expert. So this is very familiar to all of
Speaker 1: us today. Right Nearly every headline says experts, say, I
Speaker 1: was at the.
Speaker 2: Doctor, Are you a doctor?
Speaker 1: How do you know? The appeal to authorityological fallacy? And
Speaker 1: so I was at the doctor the other day, and
Speaker 1: I don't watch mainstream television, but of course they got
Speaker 1: one in there and it's on the news channel, and
Speaker 1: so they have a little ticker that goes across the bottom,
Speaker 1: just like we see here and almost everyone, well everyone
Speaker 1: was an appeal to authority, but almost everyone literally said
Speaker 1: experts say in them, so we can Yeah, And then
Speaker 1: through COVID, of course, I think we've covered this that
Speaker 1: it became painfully obvious that we're just listening to the
Speaker 1: opinion of the expert.
Speaker 2: Right, and is that even like even the wind of
Speaker 2: the expert opinion is based on their own falsehoods, that
Speaker 2: they've created a science and an allopathy to build around us,
Speaker 2: to make them feel superior, to create these institutions where
Speaker 2: they only showed their own empirical knowledge and drive that
Speaker 2: into people's brains. Therefore, the only outcome can only be
Speaker 2: the same outcome. There's not thinking, there's not advancement. It's
Speaker 2: all stagnant. And that's what people don't understand. If any
Speaker 2: advancement occurs, it's based on the pile of bullshit that's
Speaker 2: been put under them. And then they just stack more
Speaker 2: bullshit on top and they say, hey, science, because it's
Speaker 2: the goey science, it's the people, it's the masses sciences,
Speaker 2: this is what you're supposed to learn. So you can't
Speaker 2: actually take this information and do anything productive with it.
Speaker 2: It's missing something. It's missing a key element to where
Speaker 2: progress is stifled or controlled by someone above them, you know.
Speaker 1: And so no matter who the cast of characters were
Speaker 1: talking about, Jesuits or you know, Jews or whoever, we
Speaker 1: just mentioned that, it's all the same movement and it is.
Speaker 1: It's and they're the tool that they're using or the
Speaker 1: method of operation is this shifting of society over to
Speaker 1: being governed by the scientific technical expert. And that's the
Speaker 1: use of facts and statistics. So it's social sciences and
Speaker 1: what what is social sciences? But the study of human nature? Right?
Speaker 1: And then applied science is when they take that information
Speaker 1: that they've gathered from watching us and apply it back
Speaker 1: into society and steer it in the way that they want. Now,
Speaker 1: that was the enlightened absolutists.
Speaker 2: You help this metadata and social media for them to
Speaker 2: steer our brains, right, like they already know how to
Speaker 2: pressure our buttons to trigger our emotional response.
Speaker 1: You know that we're seeing the furthest elaboration of their
Speaker 1: imagination in this in this realm right of social control. Right,
Speaker 1: And so we see easily that social science is one
Speaker 1: of the major controlling mechanisms of our society. And this
Speaker 1: is how they they shift and move through social reform
Speaker 1: is through the social sciences. And this really gets established
Speaker 1: during the progressive era.
Speaker 2: And somebody, somebody brought this to my attention or they
Speaker 2: they mentioned that they you know, they see this in me,
Speaker 2: and that is my emphasis on natural medicine, the medical
Speaker 2: truth and stuff like that, or to expand it out
Speaker 2: more like the fraud of virus and this idea of contagion.
Speaker 2: And the reason why I think that's so important is
Speaker 2: because so many of the lies that we feel inferior
Speaker 2: to these quote unquote experts about has to do with
Speaker 2: our own health, has to do with the fear of
Speaker 2: being ill, of you know, smallpox, this, that, the other thing,
Speaker 2: and that's where the biggest lies have occurred. Like you know,
Speaker 2: you have Rothschilds going and pushing for the pasteurization of milk.
Speaker 1: That's where pasture comes in.
Speaker 2: You have that's the basis of germ theory, and even
Speaker 2: Pasture toward the end of his life was you know,
Speaker 2: basically confessing that, you know, bay Schamp was right. And
Speaker 2: that's what Giuseppe yesterday had reminded me of because there
Speaker 2: was a memoir that nobody like reads that he had
Speaker 2: mentioned in the note or something like that, But I mean,
Speaker 2: it's it's all there. I mean to get to break
Speaker 2: down that is a key to unlocking this this prison
Speaker 2: of our minds to where we feel inferior and get
Speaker 2: off our knees and stand the health back up.
Speaker 1: You know, right, that's a large reason why we started
Speaker 1: growing our own food and started a farm. From my mind,
Speaker 1: it's just because we needed it. And so the one thing,
Speaker 1: you know, it's obvious to most people that this is
Speaker 1: happening to our food industry. And so what they've done
Speaker 1: there is they've got between you and source again, So
Speaker 1: your source of good food, your source of good information,
Speaker 1: your source of good spirit if you're looking for spirituality.
Speaker 1: We see that anytime that we are actually trying to
Speaker 1: engage with zero degrees of separation with our own powers,
Speaker 1: whether you know our own labor right, this is where
Speaker 1: the labor union comes in and they step in between.
Speaker 1: And this is what they called it an entering wedge.
Speaker 1: And so you're saying saying that our food industry sucks,
Speaker 1: and that's true, and it's because they put the scientific
Speaker 1: expert in there so that it could now even further
Speaker 1: as we see today, remove us away from good food.
Speaker 1: And this is why it's important to grow your own food.
Speaker 2: It's funny how they used and they've supported, like these
Speaker 2: Marxists right in the background. They supported the bourgeois, built
Speaker 2: up the idea of factory allowed and supported the conditions
Speaker 2: of terribly long days and bad labor conditions. And then
Speaker 2: they flip on them and turn and turn into the
Speaker 2: unionized people who are against the bourgeois. So every every
Speaker 2: everything is a treacherous betrayal with them. You know, they
Speaker 2: use different key elements to create the bad conditions by
Speaker 2: you know, basically encouraging it to occur with pressure, with money,
Speaker 2: and then they flip the script and next thing, you know,
Speaker 2: you're the enemy. And that's so it goes down the line, yep.
Speaker 1: And so a real easy way to tell when you
Speaker 1: being manipulated, if you're being removed from your source. So
Speaker 1: always be This is why primary source material is the
Speaker 1: most important or at least the you know, the the
Speaker 1: most accurate way to get to the truth of history.
Speaker 2: Can I just ask you real quick, there is when
Speaker 2: your hat goes this way, a light comes right across
Speaker 2: your face. So if it's I don't know if you
Speaker 2: can tilt it or something. Maybe it doesn't matter, but
Speaker 2: I mean, if you don't want to be whited out,
Speaker 2: then there you go.
Speaker 1: There. So, having said all that about the scientific expert
Speaker 1: facts and statistics, I've been sharing on Facebook the last
Speaker 1: couple of days this misunderstanding of facts. We see a
Speaker 1: lot of people, even the awake and engaged, using facts
Speaker 1: as an end all and be all when they're subjective
Speaker 1: and there is as many viewpoints to facts generally as
Speaker 1: there are people looking at it. So I've had some
Speaker 1: pushback on that that certain things are facts and they're
Speaker 1: irrefutable generally not true that they are considered still subjective.
Speaker 1: And this is why they have fact checkers in our world,
Speaker 1: because they can play with the facts. And what pisses
Speaker 1: off off the most about it is that they are
Speaker 1: playing with the facts. You can go into these articles
Speaker 1: and see where they aren't quite playing it right, and
Speaker 1: they're using tricks of semantics and word games, and so that's.
Speaker 2: You know, yeah, cherry picky, that's why statistics are so
Speaker 2: absolutely ridiculous, and that's why a lot of this is
Speaker 2: based on like you were saying.
Speaker 1: Right, And so then this is a perfect lead off
Speaker 1: point to finish what we talked about last Wednesday. Okay,
Speaker 1: so I'm going to share here again Brande's perty scientific
Speaker 1: management and the principles of scientific management. And this is
Speaker 1: really where they took the stats and facts and the
Speaker 1: opinion of the scientific expert and infused it into our
Speaker 1: modern system of law. And what do they call it today?
Speaker 1: If you go and talk to historians of the subject,
Speaker 1: it'll be between them that what really started it was
Speaker 1: something called the Brandeis Brief. Hmm. Okay, it's named after
Speaker 1: I bet you many people have even heard of love it,
Speaker 1: and actually I had never heard of it until I
Speaker 1: was researching too. But this really sets precedent in a
Speaker 1: in in our entire system of law today. And it's
Speaker 1: called sociological jurisprudence. And what is that but the combining
Speaker 1: of social science and the collection of facts and statistics
Speaker 1: in place of legal argument.
Speaker 2: In place of right pardon, I said, in place of that.
Speaker 2: That's that's the key there.
Speaker 1: Yes, And so we see here and I've got all
Speaker 1: the sources At the bottom, Wilson found the judicial outlook
Speaker 1: of Lewis D. Brandeis, Harvard Law School professor, highly congenial
Speaker 1: Brandeis was the author of the historic Brandeis Brief, which
Speaker 1: ushered in a whole new phase of constitutional law based
Speaker 1: more on sociological than legal interpretation.
Speaker 2: And you know, no matter how like what do you
Speaker 2: call it? Allegedly brilliant he was in in this arena
Speaker 2: in whop Sorry, hold on, I did the wrong bud, sorrybody,
Speaker 2: that's okay.
Speaker 5: Uh?
Speaker 2: Why were people listening to him? Why was he giving
Speaker 2: that so much attention? He must have had a very
Speaker 2: big shadow behind him, you know what I mean? For them.
Speaker 2: Then he had to be sure, you know, steering something
Speaker 2: for a much larger agenda. That's why they all listened,
Speaker 2: because that doesn't happen any other way.
Speaker 1: It's not it's not organic. And we see Brandeis's father
Speaker 1: Adolph a Rothschild agent, right, So we see Brandeis being
Speaker 1: steered by the Rothchilds before he's even born. This is
Speaker 1: why the Brandeyes clan with two other of their associated families,
Speaker 1: I would I would suggest probably the interbreed, right, they
Speaker 1: all came over together to open up the Midwest. Yes,
Speaker 1: what they said, right, And that's his father. So Louis
Speaker 1: Brandeis is born and he's groomed from the earliest of
Speaker 1: ages to become who he is.
Speaker 2: And he was basically mostly in Kentucky, right.
Speaker 1: Louisville, Kentucky. It's not named after him, but that is
Speaker 1: exactly where. And his associations with Abraham Lincoln overlap there too.
Speaker 1: So and when you look at the two faces put together,
Speaker 1: Abraham Lincoln and Louis Brandey's makes you stop and think.
Speaker 2: Yeah, there's you know, we have a mutual friend nick
Speaker 2: Nicko Demas. And yes, he's going to be going to
Speaker 2: that library a getting soon to find somewhere source material
Speaker 2: for us.
Speaker 1: Yes, we've had some conversations this morning in fact about
Speaker 1: all the pushing that forward. And he may or may
Speaker 1: not be listening. He's actually in negotiations to do his
Speaker 1: unions in his real life right now.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, so that's this work.
Speaker 1: Actually when he came across it really affected him. And
Speaker 1: so he's he's shared a lot of stuff that's just amazing,
Speaker 1: you know, shows just how revered Louis brandeis he is
Speaker 1: in Louisville. And so yeah, we're going to go into
Speaker 1: the Louisville University Lewis Brandei School of Law library.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and Nicodemus just for people out there who don't know.
Speaker 2: He's been on the show a bunch of times and
Speaker 2: he enhances the show. Is an awful lot, Like, he
Speaker 2: sends me a lot of things. So he's an incontegral
Speaker 2: part to what we do here.
Speaker 1: So totally, totally I agree, And he shares a lot
Speaker 1: with me and we have conversations a lot, and I
Speaker 1: appreciate him.
Speaker 2: He's the one who told me about you actually right right, Yeah.
Speaker 1: He's the one that hooked us up. Yeah. So brandeis
Speaker 1: in the National Consumers League. This is where the Skull
Speaker 1: and Bones Russell Sage Foundation comes into to write all
Speaker 1: of this literature. And what are they doing but creating
Speaker 1: social reform through legislation. This is the most effective. So
Speaker 1: this goes back to the French Revolution and their attempt
Speaker 1: to overthrow governments. They thought that the most effective way
Speaker 1: was to the through law and legislating change. And so
Speaker 1: you know, we talk about law being and the founders
Speaker 1: of sociology or social science say that law was the
Speaker 1: most efficient engine of social control. And when you think
Speaker 1: about when you think about it, of course law controls
Speaker 1: us all at all times. It was another realization through
Speaker 1: this work that I was like, oh, of course they
Speaker 1: would focus a lot of money and effort on our
Speaker 1: system of law, because yes, it is the most effective
Speaker 1: social engine. So Florence Kelly, Josephine Goldmark, these are both
Speaker 1: second cousins of Louis, one of the of whom he marries.
Speaker 1: They together put together this brandeis brief in this nineteen
Speaker 1: oh eight Supreme Court case that's a precedent center. All
Speaker 1: of them are Moeler versus Oregon. These are things that
Speaker 1: get discussed in law schools, and Brandey's is looked at
Speaker 1: in in law school as much like his buddy Walter
Speaker 1: Litman has looked at in journalist schools as the founder
Speaker 1: of this new modern way that we look at law.
Speaker 2: I wasn't familiar with the Brene's connection to uh to
Speaker 2: you said Freud, right, is that.
Speaker 1: Who we're talking about?
Speaker 2: Yeah, well that's that's interesting of itself. And then also yes,
Speaker 2: the Litmann connection.
Speaker 1: Here as well.
Speaker 2: I mean there's a lot, there's a lot of crossing
Speaker 2: of lines. If you're looking at one of those things
Speaker 2: where everybody looks like they're either they're solving like a detective,
Speaker 2: uh mystery. You know, the pins on the board with
Speaker 2: the string tie too. It's there's a lot of other
Speaker 2: connections there. It's very interesting, and that's exactly what we're doing.
Speaker 2: We're just putting things together and we're trying to you know,
Speaker 2: avoid that stereotype, and we're just trying to put it
Speaker 2: together in an honest, uh intellectual way that and you know,
Speaker 2: concise and easy to understand, because this is an amazing story,
Speaker 2: and I've seen many people try to explain it and
Speaker 2: just further confuse people.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a ball of up.
Speaker 2: But going back to the source of where it's all
Speaker 2: coming from, you know, it's not the effect that you
Speaker 2: need to find. You need to find the actual you know,
Speaker 2: what was pushing it, what hand was guiding it.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So the National Consumers League was found in eighteen
Speaker 1: ninety nine by Jane Adams, that's a name that we
Speaker 1: would all recognize as a social reformer from the progressive era,
Speaker 1: and Florence Kelly and Josephine Lowell as a social reform
Speaker 1: movement concerned with the conditions under which goods were manufactured
Speaker 1: and distributed. So, what I think I see here is
Speaker 1: the first establishment of the international order of our world
Speaker 1: today towards internationalism. They had to And when you think
Speaker 1: about it, it makes sense if America was going to lead
Speaker 1: us into the twentieth century, they had to adapt to
Speaker 1: this new international idea of you know, import export from
Speaker 1: them all over around the world. So this is imperialistic concerns, right,
Speaker 1: And so we see through this legislation this we promoted
Speaker 1: creation of administrative agencies to enforce protective legislation and played
Speaker 1: a major role in defending reform measures in court.
Speaker 2: I just want to like, it makes me like the
Speaker 2: industrial revolution in and of itself was very I mean,
Speaker 2: of course there was advancements in technology and YadA YadA,
Speaker 2: but this artificial existence of being coming coming off of
Speaker 2: the land and becoming dependent upon a boss, yes, and
Speaker 2: cramming yourself in a shitty condition with dirty cities that
Speaker 2: the level of disease alone, and the piss and the
Speaker 2: shit in the streets and everything. Like I've read books
Speaker 2: about this stuff and it's horrendous. Like they left that
Speaker 2: peaceful life of working the land to come in and
Speaker 2: do that because of the I don't know what what
Speaker 2: drove them there, I don't know, but it's just strange
Speaker 2: that we lost our natural instinct and became workers.
Speaker 1: Well, we know what drove them there, right, it was Rockefellers.
Speaker 1: And you know they employed military groups that came in.
Speaker 1: It's a whole era called the Labor Wars. It was striking.
Speaker 1: It was like they drew guns at each other and
Speaker 1: killed each other. This was highly contentious era of American
Speaker 1: history that not a lot of people talk about, you know, but.
Speaker 2: I mean on the farms they did that. They they
Speaker 2: pointed them to push people towards the cities or like,
Speaker 2: what are they?
Speaker 1: Yeah, this is what they Well, it was the urbanization. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so we still see that movement today. We're going into
Speaker 1: fifteen minute cities. They're just the same exact movement. Yeah.
Speaker 1: But this is what we're seeing is the origins really
Speaker 1: of the modern rendition, because I think that a lot
Speaker 1: of this has been going on for a while. But
Speaker 1: in Science of Law, we show the actual drawings of
Speaker 1: how they looked first at a first settlement and then
Speaker 1: how it built into a village and then a town
Speaker 1: and then a city, and how it created a distributive
Speaker 1: network across America. And that's what these guys found it.
Speaker 1: This is a manifest destiny moving west. Brandeis family is
Speaker 1: huge in this there's another Brandeis family that that creates
Speaker 1: the brand Eye shopping centers where you can buy clothes
Speaker 1: and it's a material center where you can you know,
Speaker 1: not the.
Speaker 2: Whole family, they had their figures and everything.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and it's a I haven't been able to make
Speaker 1: a link between the two, but they're obviously linked because
Speaker 1: they come from the same place just north of Prague
Speaker 1: called brand Eyes on the Elp. Right, So they're all
Speaker 1: family and you can see that they've branched out and
Speaker 1: started to.
Speaker 2: And when was that name, Brandeis on the Elp, Like,
Speaker 2: I mean, they must have a deeper history there if
Speaker 2: they're like you know, every once in a while you
Speaker 2: see a farmer with his name on a street sign, right,
Speaker 2: you know his last but it's but that's that's a
Speaker 2: whole lot different.
Speaker 1: Than having an entire area named after you. Right. Interestingly,
Speaker 1: the farmers that we lease from his family is so old.
Speaker 1: They're one of our clients lives on the street that
Speaker 1: is named after him his family.
Speaker 2: Yeah that you know, in honors of the people that
Speaker 2: live there, because no one else lived there at one
Speaker 2: point except for them, So you.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, So what I want to try to get
Speaker 1: clear here is that you know, this move to have
Speaker 1: society governed by the scientific technical expert is really based
Speaker 1: on the use of facts and stats to fool people.
Speaker 1: And so all I'm showing here is that this goes
Speaker 1: to the highest seats of law in America. Louis Brandeis
Speaker 1: instills this sociological jurisprudence, and today you can see, you know,
Speaker 1: he's the first activist Supreme Court justice. This is what
Speaker 1: Ruth Bader Ginsburg said just before she died, that Brandeis
Speaker 1: was really the original. And you know, we've seen in
Speaker 1: the last twenty years a total sort of change over.
Speaker 1: He sees US Supreme Court justices or judges of the
Speaker 1: Ninth Circuit of New York, you know, uh, being activists,
Speaker 1: and so this is a huge step away from American tradition.
Speaker 1: They weren't supposed to have any affiliations politically. But Brandize
Speaker 1: is the first to really change this. Yeah, so he
Speaker 1: says the source three here. He Brandized then outlined what
Speaker 1: he would need for a brief, namely facts published by
Speaker 1: anyone with expert knowledge of industry and its relation to
Speaker 1: women's hours of labor, such as factory inspectors, physicians, trade unions, economists,
Speaker 1: social workers. If I could return to Boston within a
Speaker 1: fortnight with such printed matter sufficiently authoritative to pass muster,
Speaker 1: we would then work up the material in the form
Speaker 1: of a brief. So this is them talking about the
Speaker 1: moments that they got together and did this. So we've
Speaker 1: provided all the sources. I strongly encourage everybody to go
Speaker 1: look for yourself. But this is what we found. Okay,
Speaker 1: So the brandeis brief.
Speaker 2: And then and and that's coming from from which this is.
Speaker 2: This is your second part right, part two and you're
Speaker 2: part two. Yeah, yep. So people want to start there,
Speaker 2: then they can branch from there. But I think it's
Speaker 2: important to go to the bulletproof pub dot com first,
Speaker 2: and that way you can get a broader picture. I mean,
Speaker 2: there's so much here that you might want to like
Speaker 2: look more into some of the other series of the
Speaker 2: blog posts and kind of make your notes and then
Speaker 2: attack your research that way, you know, from all the
Speaker 2: things that sparked your interest.
Speaker 1: Right, And so brandeis coins the term scientific management. We've
Speaker 1: gone over this. The principles of scientific management is then
Speaker 1: translated into every language around the world and used by
Speaker 1: a Lenin Stallin, Trotsky, and Mao all openly admitted through
Speaker 1: their own literature that Taylorism, meaning the principles of scientific management,
Speaker 1: was the most effective way to control their respective populations.
Speaker 1: So this is a coordinated takeover of all of the
Speaker 1: people in China, Union, United States, all at the same time.
Speaker 2: Someday we should talk about the like maybe it's related
Speaker 2: to Anthony Sutton's work about the the skull and Bones
Speaker 2: and like the Yale in China and how that you know,
Speaker 2: groomed Mao. And basically we're looking at uh An although
Speaker 2: they put a person of the same ethnicity up front
Speaker 2: in the middle, you know, in in the government of China,
Speaker 2: China hasn't ever been hasn't been Chinese, meaning their's in
Speaker 2: quite some time, you know. It's it's the same hand,
Speaker 2: and that that's a big country. When we talk about
Speaker 2: China being a threat, you might as well just say
Speaker 2: it's the world banks being a threat.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they're all in Yeah, they're all in it together.
Speaker 1: Uh Mao, it's probably skulling bones because he's a Yale
Speaker 1: grad from Peaking University exactly, Yale Wing at Peaking University
Speaker 1: and Yale China. That relationship is older than America, right, crazy? Right?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: So uh, you see through the further telling of this
Speaker 1: story that brandeis is a leader of men. He infiltrates
Speaker 1: these groups of creatives, including this guy, Henry Gant. He
Speaker 1: creates the Gant chart. So if you're a construction worker, subtrade,
Speaker 1: you ever on a construction site, you'll know what a
Speaker 1: Gant chart is. There still used at every job site
Speaker 1: as far as planning and efficiency is the key word, right.
Speaker 1: This is the efficiency movement that Brandize is establishing. That's
Speaker 1: one of the major pillars of progressivism.
Speaker 2: It's just this efficiency in the in the in the
Speaker 2: true form of the sense, or is it because I
Speaker 2: think it is. It's the true form of sense of
Speaker 2: the word efficiency. Because they were trying to milk as
Speaker 2: much as they could out of the out of the worker.
Speaker 1: Well this is sorry, good, This is the perfectibility of
Speaker 1: the man, right right. This is really the burgeoning stepths
Speaker 1: of singularity AI all of those things. This is the
Speaker 1: first handshake between man and machine.
Speaker 2: And I only bring that up because we know how
Speaker 2: words have their inverted meanings when they use them or
Speaker 2: they use them in a way to make the word
Speaker 2: themselves meaningless, and efficiency is one of those words has
Speaker 2: lost its meaning because of that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and you'll hear the word efficiency as you will
Speaker 1: hear the word preparedness today still, and so when you
Speaker 1: hear those words being used, that'll be a progressive use
Speaker 1: in those words. Brandeis described scientific management as a revolution
Speaker 1: in industry comparable only to that effect. And then the
Speaker 1: transition from hand labor to machinery. Okay, we're looking at
Speaker 1: the rudimentary, first mechanical steps into singularity. And then Taylor
Speaker 1: wrote to Brandeis because Brandeis really made tailorism popular through
Speaker 1: one of his court cases, and so he promoted Taylor,
Speaker 1: and Taylor wrote to him after said, please let me
Speaker 1: congratulate you most warmly upon the masterly way in which
Speaker 1: you marshaled your forces and presented your testimony, and also
Speaker 1: on the publicity which your testimony has received in the
Speaker 1: interest by the papers all over the world. Now, Brandeis
Speaker 1: is close personal friends with Norman Hapgood and all these
Speaker 1: editors of magazines like McClure's and American magazines, so he
Speaker 1: has no problem getting promoted. And in fact, they're all
Speaker 1: in it together. And you know, these muckraking Socialists were
Speaker 1: just the bullhorn for the the amplifier. They're just spreading,
Speaker 1: broadcasting the Brandeis message.
Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, it's this. This goes into a lot of
Speaker 2: interesting details because I mean it's you've done You've done
Speaker 2: so such good work here, and I mean I wouldn't
Speaker 2: even want to know, like how long this mess have
Speaker 2: taken you, but I'm glad you did it for sure. Yeah,
Speaker 2: there's different names. I didn't even recognize when I you know,
Speaker 2: because I didn't really dig this deep. Frankest was enough
Speaker 2: for me at that point because of where I was
Speaker 2: heading with my rechar when I was doing the book
Speaker 2: that I was like, oh, that's interesting, and that they
Speaker 2: just happened to also be Francis and so are the
Speaker 2: Rothschilds as of the seventeen eighties. Well, you know, but
Speaker 2: what's knowing that that's one cohesive unit that's driving for
Speaker 2: one specific purpose. That's and then I started looking at
Speaker 2: the Zionism aspect and like, that's the same thing. It's
Speaker 2: just a different name. Francism is my push yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and it's just him infiltrating different groups of people.
Speaker 1: And so you see his biographers talking about Zionism or
Speaker 1: you see his biographers talking about scientific management, but there's
Speaker 1: not a biographer putting it all together like we have. Right.
Speaker 1: This is why we call him the maker of our
Speaker 1: modern day social contract because he is just so influential
Speaker 1: on everything that we struggle to make everybody aware of today.
Speaker 1: So just to give you an idea, we were talking
Speaker 1: about labor wars and this. You know Brandize, it's famous
Speaker 1: for bringing labor and capital together in what he called
Speaker 1: the protocol apiece. And so there's a quote here that
Speaker 1: I want to Readabor was readily able to understand and
Speaker 1: agree with brand Eise that employers would, without involving large
Speaker 1: capital expenditure, gain greater productivity from labor, reduced labor costs,
Speaker 1: more efficient use of plant and equipment, lower interest and taxes,
Speaker 1: lesser depreciation charges, reduced stock of raw and processed materials,
Speaker 1: and lesson strained on credit. However, they could not understand
Speaker 1: or agree with Brandise as to what employees would gain
Speaker 1: from scientific management. All right, it wasn't about employees.
Speaker 2: That's why.
Speaker 1: When you look at the actual documents, and this goes
Speaker 1: through court documents that you can read, and I have
Speaker 1: the bringing capital and labor together. The manufacturers and labor.
Speaker 1: It's the manufacturers that really endorsed the idea of a
Speaker 1: labor union. It's much easier to convince one person, one representative,
Speaker 1: than a whole crowd of people. And you know, Gustav
Speaker 1: Lebon's book had already long come out. They understood, you know,
Speaker 1: group psychology was really a lot dumber. So they had
Speaker 1: to infuse the scientific expert. And you know, the scientific
Speaker 1: expert is going to be, you know, leaning towards the
Speaker 1: wishes and demands of the manufacture long before he would
Speaker 1: consider the concerns of labor.
Speaker 2: And we see them and I see like the if
Speaker 2: you want to consider like their their their sales pitch
Speaker 2: to be their their propaganda, right, so there's certain propaganda
Speaker 2: that's targeted toward basically tilling the field of the masses.
Speaker 2: It's not really so much to convince them, it's just
Speaker 2: to set that seed in there, right, and then start
Speaker 2: so that that the ideas already in the in their
Speaker 2: in the back of their mind. And then you work
Speaker 2: on the people who you know, like you said, like
Speaker 2: the manufacturers themselves, who might be of a potentially higher intellect,
Speaker 2: but they're easy to manipulate too, because they have desires,
Speaker 2: and then you play on those desires. Hey, do you
Speaker 2: want this, you know, for the same amount of people
Speaker 2: that you have working for you. If we've you know,
Speaker 2: if we if we initiate this this or you know,
Speaker 2: start this plan out or whatever you want to call it,
Speaker 2: then you're gonna get more out of them, you know.
Speaker 2: And then oh sounds great, right, you know, because laborer
Speaker 2: is always the most expensive part of any operation, unfortunately.
Speaker 1: And so yeah, right, no, no, go ahead, Okay, So
Speaker 1: we've talked about the House of Truth, and.
Speaker 2: You tell us attle bit more about that.
Speaker 1: Well, it's a political salon. So they took the idea
Speaker 1: of the French revolutions and the revolutions that were going
Speaker 1: on in Europe in eighteen forty eight, because this is
Speaker 1: how they were able to establish themselves as through political salons.
Speaker 1: And so that's just somebody's house that they invited all
Speaker 1: of their like minded friends over and then they would
Speaker 1: talk shop and figure out, you know, from a socialistic
Speaker 1: or communist viewpoint, how are we going to overthrow America?
Speaker 2: Right? And you know what this makes me think of
Speaker 2: is the reading groups that they had in you know,
Speaker 2: in Wystop's time and beyond that when according when accordingly,
Speaker 2: according to everybody else, the Illuminati was already gone or whatever.
Speaker 2: They had these reading groups. This is how they work
Speaker 2: theirselves into other places. Just because you know, the place
Speaker 2: in Germany was supposedly broken up, that doesn't mean there
Speaker 2: wasn't already everywhere else. And they do. They use these
Speaker 2: reading groups, these intellectual groups, these uh you know, that's
Speaker 2: that's how they that's how they got together underneath those
Speaker 2: that the facade of a reading group, and that's how
Speaker 2: they plotted their subversive actions. So it's the same thing
Speaker 2: as this like house of truth type of thing. And
Speaker 2: I like the word political salon. I usually think of
Speaker 2: getting my hair done when I think of a salon,
Speaker 2: but it's kind of funny to me.
Speaker 1: I get the deeper meanings. So yeah, and it's another
Speaker 1: term that we weren't really familiar with, same with me.
Speaker 1: And then so I started looking at political slans, and
Speaker 1: then we found Huxley hanging out with the creators of
Speaker 1: critical theory, Theodore Dorno, Max Horkheimer and all of these
Speaker 1: exiled German Jews hanging out in Los Angeles at other
Speaker 1: political slots. And so what is Los Angeles and New York,
Speaker 1: but two laboratories. This is how they looked at it,
Speaker 1: and they suggest this all throughout their literature and the
Speaker 1: creation of the Protocol of Peace, bringing labor and capital together.
Speaker 1: That's what they said. So you see that Taylorism is
Speaker 1: the most influent, one of the most influentialisms of the
Speaker 1: twentieth century. This is what William Jennings said on ABC News.
Speaker 1: But you see also Henry R. Town, president of American
Speaker 1: Society of Mechanical Engineers, forward to Taylor's Shop Management, which
Speaker 1: came out just a little earlier in nineteen ten. The
Speaker 1: substitute of machinery for unaided human labor was the great
Speaker 1: industrial achievement of the nineteenth century. The new achievement to
Speaker 1: which doctor Taylor points the way, consists in elevating human
Speaker 1: labor itself to a higher plane of efficiency and of
Speaker 1: earning power. Now, one of the other key guys in
Speaker 1: labor relations, in this creation of labor relations is Robert
Speaker 1: grovenor Valentine, who owns the House of Truth. Okay, he's
Speaker 1: the guy that's working under Taft in Indian affairs of
Speaker 1: all things. And he leaves his administration opens up this
Speaker 1: House of truth seventeen twenty seven nineteenth Street, Northwest Washington,
Speaker 1: one mile from the White House, where they devise the
Speaker 1: idea to overthrow the definition of liberalism. This is where
Speaker 1: they create Mount Rushmore. It's all just as a bevy
Speaker 1: of Harvard Law School Phi Beta Kappas, but Freemasons too.
Speaker 1: It's built. It was built specifically to promote Theodore Roosevelt's
Speaker 1: first ever progressive part in nineteen twelve. So Valentine, he's
Speaker 1: key in bringing them together because he's the one that
Speaker 1: suggests here in this top quote, in studying the resistance
Speaker 1: of organized labor to scientific management, he's admitting that there's
Speaker 1: a resistance from the workers to being perfected. Valentine came
Speaker 1: to see that the objection lay not so much in
Speaker 1: the thing itself as in the fact that it was
Speaker 1: introduced by the employer and for his own advantage. So
Speaker 1: he told all these negotiators, Okay, we'll make it about
Speaker 1: the workers, make it sound a little better, do the
Speaker 1: same thing, change the language around it, and it'll work.
Speaker 1: And this is really why Valentine is still famous today
Speaker 1: because he came up with that idea, suggested it and
Speaker 1: it worked. And you know, so Valentine is very close
Speaker 1: with Brandeis. Brandeis's the honored guest at the House of
Speaker 1: Truth all the time. And so Valentine dies right after this,
Speaker 1: right after he gives this information that helps bring labor
Speaker 1: and manufacture together. He dies right after Frederick Quinslow Taylor
Speaker 1: publishes the Scientific Principles of Scientific Management. He dies. So
Speaker 1: you make up your own conclusions there. But Valentine died
Speaker 1: in the presence of feeling Frankfurter. So the Protocol apiece
Speaker 1: is this document that starts and it's precedent setting. We
Speaker 1: still look at it today as the origins of, you know,
Speaker 1: the bringing together of labor and capital. So he Brandi's
Speaker 1: described the Protocol system as a large step towards industrial democracy.
Speaker 1: Who wrote the book Industrial Democracy, Sydney Webb founding Fabian member.
Speaker 1: So here's a key place to see that there's a
Speaker 1: connection between the Fabians and the American progressives in establishing
Speaker 1: this social reform that was going on in Britain just before,
Speaker 1: and it's actually going on in Canada and all of
Speaker 1: the Western world at the same time. It's just Britain
Speaker 1: really establishes it first, it comes from Europe and then
Speaker 1: the United States, and they sort of guide the American progressives.
Speaker 1: Walter Littman is close personal friends with Graham Wallace, who's
Speaker 1: another founding Fabian member who wrote the book The Great Society,
Speaker 1: which is synonymous with Industrial Democracy. It's the same thing,
Speaker 1: and it was it was dedicated to Walter Lipman. So
Speaker 1: when Lipmann went to Europe, you'd stay with Graham Wallace.
Speaker 1: So you can see it. It's a it's and and
Speaker 1: these guys are dropping in at the House of Truth.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think I think one of the reasons why
Speaker 2: this is coming from Britain in that respect is, you know,
Speaker 2: after well William of Orange basically paved the way for
Speaker 2: the Rothschilds to gain control over the Bank of England.
Speaker 2: After that, I don't think it was the same country
Speaker 2: ever again, you know.
Speaker 1: So yep. So I'll just read a couple of quotes
Speaker 1: here and then we're going to move on to some
Speaker 1: of these videos just to show where we're at with
Speaker 1: Frankism today. So, industrial democracy was a term that before
Speaker 1: nineteen oh nine had significant relevance only for reformers and intellectuals.
Speaker 1: Events in progressive era New York grounded this abstract theory
Speaker 1: into streets of the Lower East Side. So here's where
Speaker 1: they're using it as a laboratory. The conflicts of the labor.
Speaker 1: Ladies garment industry provided already made laboratory.
Speaker 2: Ask how is it that so many first uh, you know,
Speaker 2: first generation? Well, how would we want to call it?
Speaker 2: You know, our founders, the principles that we have this
Speaker 2: impression that they had to you know, how did this
Speaker 2: move in with such rapidity without resistance or we just
Speaker 2: not told about the resistance that occurred.
Speaker 1: Exactly, there was major resistance. So the Protocol Apiece, a
Speaker 1: radical trade agreement in New York City's ladies garment industry,
Speaker 1: ushered in a new experiment with industrial democracy. So they're
Speaker 1: experimenting on us long ago. When the Protocol a Piece
Speaker 1: was signed on September second, nineteen ten, it ushered in
Speaker 1: a new era of industrial labor relations. That's from the
Speaker 1: American Jewish Archives Protocol building.
Speaker 2: Up to the Federal Reserve Act. Everything was being the
Speaker 2: blocks are being set down, you know.
Speaker 1: Yeah. The strikes set the stage and organized both workers
Speaker 1: and owners into powerful groups necessary for an industry wide agreement.
Speaker 1: Industrial democrats use this canvas is provided by workers to
Speaker 1: paint a new picture. Men such as Louis Brandeis or
Speaker 1: Lewis Brandeis and others marshaled the power of social science
Speaker 1: and used their influence to broker deals to gain a
Speaker 1: seat at the industrial relations table. So there's documents that
Speaker 1: I've provided. These are primary source material letters that you
Speaker 1: can go through showing that there was much communication. Brandeis
Speaker 1: is really considered the sage advisor to all. He in
Speaker 1: a room full of lawyers, he walks in and takes
Speaker 1: charge of all of this. This is why he's the
Speaker 1: primary author of Protocol of Peace, because all of these
Speaker 1: other attorneys don't have answers. They're trying to figure it out.
Speaker 1: But Brandeis walks in and this knowledge and this technology
Speaker 1: probably taken from years prior. You know, how do we
Speaker 1: bring labor and manufacture together? But a key significant moment
Speaker 1: in our history to Ward's wage slavery.
Speaker 2: Really yeah, so what do you think? What do you
Speaker 2: think the chances are if are of our leaders carried
Speaker 2: on with such tenacity the resistance to a central bank
Speaker 2: charter that alec You know that Andrew Jackson had first,
Speaker 2: you know, defended and uh and set the stage for
Speaker 2: would there have maybe not I mean, do you think
Speaker 2: it would have been at least postponed or do you
Speaker 2: think it would still have fallen nineteen thirteen? There it is.
Speaker 2: I mean if people, if you know, successive president was
Speaker 2: still a real president and not just a puppet. I mean,
Speaker 2: what Andrew Jackson did stifled their plans, and that's why
Speaker 2: they hate him. You know, that idea of the central
Speaker 2: Bank already being here to do things like economic crises
Speaker 2: like eighteen ninety nine with you know, you know all
Speaker 2: this stuff. That's what led people into the hole, not
Speaker 2: that they'd even wanted it then, because it was a face.
Speaker 2: It's a farce how they they pushed it through Congress.
Speaker 2: But I mean it makes it like but they were
Speaker 2: conditioning the path the masses to accept it anyway, with
Speaker 2: all the money's unstable, you know what I mean. It
Speaker 2: was all bullshit.
Speaker 1: Oh yes, And this was a deliberate move to move
Speaker 1: us away from free market laissez fair.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 1: This is a removal of us from source of our
Speaker 1: own money and our own ability to create income and
Speaker 1: profit from it. Right, This idea that the free market
Speaker 1: is going to correct itself and check itself. You know,
Speaker 1: we've never really had an opportunity to explore that because
Speaker 1: you know, they they create all of these crashes and
Speaker 1: they blame lass a fair free market for the very
Speaker 1: reasons of the crash, the Great Depression nineteen twenty nine.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, and that's the established through the dialectic problem
Speaker 1: reaction solution.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 2: It's always you know, they always plant the other direction.
Speaker 2: Whenever there's a there's a you know, they do something
Speaker 2: at someone else's fault. That's that's a that's classic.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And you know during COVID, we saw them trying
Speaker 1: to really go hard on removal of cash from society.
Speaker 1: And cash gives us the ability to do things without
Speaker 1: the government being able to act, and it benefits the
Speaker 1: rugged individual. And so this is why they're doing that.
Speaker 1: It has nothing to do with the virus. It's just
Speaker 1: trying to control us more and take all of the
Speaker 1: mechanisms that empower us away.
Speaker 2: Well, simply if there's no you know, you're at a
Speaker 2: farmer's market, simply, you know, it's like they might not
Speaker 2: have a little card reader, So why wouldn't you would
Speaker 2: need cash? You know, that's something as simple as that.
Speaker 2: It's practical and not that the cash or the fiat
Speaker 2: is any better. But it's you know what I mean,
Speaker 2: they're they're just tightening the reins even more from one
Speaker 2: conditioning to another for us to feel and feel dependent
Speaker 2: on them for everything. That's a source of income.
Speaker 1: And at its very basis, the idea of elimination of
Speaker 1: cash is illogical because we see all the time when
Speaker 1: the digital world crashes goes down for you know, a
Speaker 1: day or two or whatever, what are we going to
Speaker 1: do without cash?
Speaker 4: Right?
Speaker 2: Well, that's I mean, that's that's and that's again that's
Speaker 2: another one of the control mechanisms because exactly it's it's
Speaker 2: by the point, what would you do?
Speaker 1: You know?
Speaker 4: Right?
Speaker 1: So right, I would say, if you want to, it's
Speaker 1: to use cash and go throughout your daily activities and
Speaker 1: tasks and use cash. You're being a revolutionary really in
Speaker 1: these times, and so I encourage everybody to do that.
Speaker 1: It's a nice, easy, uh, stress free way, and it's
Speaker 1: kind of fun to watch how complicated all of a
Speaker 1: sudden it can be to give somebody change.
Speaker 3: Jacksonville, Florida, Tenpi, Arizona.
Speaker 1: Okay, So I want to get to this Jimmy dor
Speaker 1: because he's a progressive, right and I've been trying to
Speaker 1: talk to him for a long time, and I put
Speaker 1: some comments on this video and I checked them and
Speaker 1: they disappeared. So this is kind of what I want
Speaker 1: to show where we're at in the modern day with
Speaker 1: all of this. And so it's just sort of breaking
Speaker 1: into the lexicon of alternative slash mainstream when you're talking
Speaker 1: Jimmy dore.
Speaker 2: Right and such and you and you already touched on
Speaker 2: this and that it's kind of like what we had
Speaker 2: talked about before we started. Jimmy Door says a lot
Speaker 2: of things that are real and true, but that's not so.
Speaker 2: I mean that that's how how, that's how influencers garner
Speaker 2: their their your trust. But it's not because he's somehow
Speaker 2: and it's he's he's another Bill Maher in that sense. Yeah,
Speaker 2: you know what I mean, Like you still have yeah,
Speaker 2: for sure.
Speaker 1: And the progressive definition of liberal right, exactly right. This
Speaker 1: is a key aspect to the to the brainwash. Is
Speaker 1: this flipping of the definition of liberalism that started at
Speaker 1: the House of Truth. You have so many people, uh,
Speaker 1: whether you're Republican, conservative or Democrat, mis using this word
Speaker 1: liberal like they misused the word facts. You know.
Speaker 2: He also has whether it's true or not. He also
Speaker 2: had his vaccine injury. So now that but that gives
Speaker 2: him more more clout, right because now he's he's he's uh, oh, well,
Speaker 2: you know he gets it, you know, with with the
Speaker 2: with the the conservative crowd. It's like, oh, he gets
Speaker 2: it because it happened to him. It's it's it's a
Speaker 2: good device, you know, plot device.
Speaker 1: Yes, So I'm gonna just let this play for the
Speaker 1: first five minutes kind of gives you all of him
Speaker 1: being introduced to it. I'm just gonna let it play.
Speaker 1: I just got to run to the washroom while this goes.
Speaker 1: So about it a minute, and then after that, if
Speaker 1: you've got any questions and you want to stop it,
Speaker 1: then just speak up and I'll stop it and we
Speaker 1: can talk about it. Okay, you got it. Okay, here
Speaker 1: we go. Tell me if you can.
Speaker 3: Hear Georgia right outside of Atlanta, jack Inville, Florida, Tempe Arizona,
Speaker 3: and Burdbank, California. Go to Jimmy Gore dot com for
Speaker 3: a link for those tickets. So Candice Soona is absolutely insane,
Speaker 3: like off her, like off her bonkers. Okay, this is disgusting,
Speaker 3: an absurd and need serious pushback.
Speaker 4: Did she say women have dicks?
Speaker 6: Few moons ago before they decided to establish Israel as
Speaker 6: a country.
Speaker 7: I know you've read like the short.
Speaker 5: Version in the classroom and it was like, oh, the
Speaker 5: Holocaust happened, and then we realized it is reel interesting.
Speaker 7: No, that's not how it went down. That's not how
Speaker 7: it went down at the f all.
Speaker 6: Okay, Catholics and Christians were going missing on Passover and
Speaker 6: then they would find bodies, okay, across Europe and they
Speaker 6: were able to trace them back to Jews.
Speaker 2: Blood life, absolutely true.
Speaker 8: They weren't Jews, Okay, these were Frankests.
Speaker 6: And so just like Leo frank killed Mary Fagan on
Speaker 6: Passover back in now, do you know what Frankis are.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that's the people that aren't Jews that used Jews basically, uh,
Speaker 4: you know, the fucking it deals with the even the
Speaker 4: Catholic Church. The Pope wasn't in on it, like there
Speaker 4: were crazy anti semi kind of bishops, and these Francists
Speaker 4: are like anti Jews.
Speaker 1: Would They're not anti Jews, okay, perfect, that's where they were.
Speaker 2: Not anti Jews. They are the nidomy of what the
Speaker 2: fucking Babylonian Talmud and the Habala delivery in Kabbala call
Speaker 2: for the expedition the the accelerationists of what the Torah
Speaker 2: and all this other ship promises to bring back the
Speaker 2: mess shak whether they believed in it or not. It's
Speaker 2: a fucking world ending agenda.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and you know what it is. It's not that
Speaker 1: they're not Jews. We're showing that they're all Jews, but
Speaker 1: they're a reformist. They're followers of reformist Judaism or not
Speaker 1: religious at all. Brandeis, Frankfurt or Littmann. They were not
Speaker 1: religious at all until later in their life when they
Speaker 1: realized that they could use it as an entering wedge.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Frankist is basically the the the inversion of multiple things,
Speaker 2: because they already claimed that this is the Messianic period,
Speaker 2: so therefore everything must be inverted. Yeah, that's it's it's satanic,
Speaker 2: But Satan has nothing to do with it in my opinion,
Speaker 2: because that's word that we use to make sense of
Speaker 2: what that just pure freaking evil thrive. It's like people
Speaker 2: need to get that, like why are they killing everybody?
Speaker 2: Because the fucking Zionists are crazy and Christian Zionists are
Speaker 2: clapping like goddamn seals and some helping out, you know.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and we're going to get to that too. All
Speaker 1: of these guys reform Judaists and Jimmy where Jew I
Speaker 1: don't know. He's definitely a progressive.
Speaker 2: Yeah, this guy in the bottom, this this guy I
Speaker 2: forgot his name. I listened to him in another video.
Speaker 2: He's a he's he's a neanderthal when it comes to yeah, everything,
Speaker 2: He's just a fucking moron. Him being on that show.
Speaker 2: It makes no sense other than that. It's like the
Speaker 2: token gooy or whatever the fuck he's supposed to be.
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 2: Yeah, uh so the he represents the idiot masses, you know, right,
Speaker 2: And the.
Speaker 1: Point I want to make there when he says that
Speaker 1: they're non Jews, I'm pushing back strong on that, saying that, yes,
Speaker 1: of course they are. But there, what is that but
Speaker 1: progressive Judaism. When you when you search reform Judaism, it
Speaker 1: comes up progressive Judaism. So it's really a progressive movement
Speaker 1: through Judaism. That's what we see when we get to
Speaker 1: the bottom of it. So go ahead and coik this.
Speaker 2: I will be back in two point two seconds myself,
Speaker 2: I throwb.
Speaker 4: Okay, yep inspire with them to kill Jews, and the
Speaker 4: Pope had to put a stop to the pograms they caused.
Speaker 4: So you know how Chris Jane is not a great
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, well okay, there were crazy anti semi kind
Speaker 4: of bishops.
Speaker 1: Okay, this is another point that I wanted to get across,
Speaker 1: and anytime I have an opportunity, I'm going to make
Speaker 1: sure that we talk about this. That he's just used
Speaker 1: anti semite and this is like a weaponized terminology. If
Speaker 1: anybody's following my work or on Facebook and seeing my shares,
Speaker 1: we've shown that there's seventy seven different branches of Semitic
Speaker 1: speaking people, of which the largest population is Arab at
Speaker 1: over five hundred million. Okay, So anytime we can, we
Speaker 1: try to define our terms, because when we define our terms,
Speaker 1: we hold them accountable to what it is that they
Speaker 1: mean when they say things like, oh, you're an anti semite,
Speaker 1: or this is all climate change. So interesting here that
Speaker 1: it gives you the ability to see who's controlled and
Speaker 1: exactly the moments that you can tell where they're controlled.
Speaker 1: Because he's still using this faulty DeFi of anti Semitism.
Speaker 1: So is Candice Owens, and so is everybody on this alternative.
Speaker 2: Slight needs to tell that they're behind that's a.
Speaker 1: Perfect It's like touching your face during poker. It's like, ooh, yep, right,
Speaker 1: you can tell a lot from that.
Speaker 4: So and these Francists are like anti Jews.
Speaker 2: Would I think they're jumping on this and steering you
Speaker 2: the stuff that's been coming out, yeh know, because now
Speaker 2: to another suf Oh, it's not the Jews. Oh, just
Speaker 2: like the Kazarians are not real Jews. You know, it's
Speaker 2: another bullshit fucking line.
Speaker 4: Had to put a stop to the pograms it caused.
Speaker 4: So you know how Christian is not a great phog Yeah, well, okay,
Speaker 4: the Sabatans are the first iteration of this sabotized sec.
Speaker 1: So the Pogrims. What's interesting there is that Louis brandeis
Speaker 1: uses in nineteen sixteen the Blackstone Petition of eighteen ninety one, Yes,
Speaker 1: Blackstone Petition in eighteen ninety one. That's when they petitioned
Speaker 1: the US president at the time, Harrison in In trying
Speaker 1: to establish American support for the pilgrims that were going
Speaker 1: on in the Polish Lithuanian pale of settlement, Central Europe,
Speaker 1: Baltic's Balkans region where all of this war has been
Speaker 1: going on for centuries.
Speaker 2: I think I've talked about blasting my book because he
Speaker 2: was He was quoted as being one of the most
Speaker 2: integral people in becoming you know, bringing about this Zionist
Speaker 2: movement for Israel. Who was Blackstone? If I'm not, If
Speaker 2: I'm not, Yeah, Brandeis even like is say it, you know,
Speaker 2: praises him and stuff.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and so does net and Yahoo. I've got the
Speaker 1: receipts on that. In his book, He's he says that
Speaker 1: William Eugene Blackstone is the real father of Zionism. So
Speaker 1: that goes back to you know, the dispensationalists of the
Speaker 1: early eighteen hundreds, right, because he was he wasn't a Jew,
Speaker 1: was he?
Speaker 2: Or was he?
Speaker 7: No? No?
Speaker 1: Right, he had real close friends with some of the
Speaker 1: same friends that Brandeis had. Hirsh is one of the
Speaker 1: names that is in this group with Rothschild's and brand
Speaker 1: Eyes in the creation of infrastructure in Israel in the
Speaker 1: nineteen twenties.
Speaker 2: So I mean guess maybe in a sense we could
Speaker 2: call him a crypto Francis, because you know, that's that's
Speaker 2: where that that's where all those ideas, the dispensation, all
Speaker 2: that stuff. You know that you're talking about Darby, you're
Speaker 2: talking about Schofield, you're talking about Ye, the Brethren's all that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and that's where Crowley sort of introduces himself in
Speaker 1: this era too. So it's total degeneracy.
Speaker 2: And they're all spies. Isn't that funny because they're perfect.
Speaker 2: They're perfect spies because they're already Francas. It's like that's
Speaker 2: what they do anyway, right, Yeah, exactly.
Speaker 4: That's one is the biggest catastrophe in Judaism before the Holocaust,
Speaker 4: and that's when a fake Messiah came out and his
Speaker 4: whole thing was like resputant like you have to sin
Speaker 4: for salvation some nonsense where you're like, yeah, you gotta
Speaker 4: do really bad stuff and then that will make the
Speaker 4: Messiah come faster, I mean come to Earth faster, Jesus.
Speaker 1: More degenerate.
Speaker 2: It was in Turkey.
Speaker 4: This guy was in Turkey, and he took like fifty
Speaker 4: to sixty percent of all the Jews at the time
Speaker 4: went along with this, the ones that and the problem
Speaker 4: was back then so many Jew. You know, Jews have
Speaker 4: been persecuted so much. They had a thing of not
Speaker 4: kicking anybody out, like we need every Jew we can get,
Speaker 4: and so they and so they let this guy. They
Speaker 4: didn't like say hey, you're not one of us, because
Speaker 4: it was like we're going to be extinct. And then
Speaker 4: there was one guy that was like really a faithful
Speaker 4: that saw through it the whole time. Yep.
Speaker 2: So this guy is a bumbling jackass who says dumb
Speaker 2: and uses follow language all the time. But now all
Speaker 2: of a sudden, he's a scholar showing what he's really
Speaker 2: there for. Right, Yeah, he's just another side, like they're
Speaker 2: both I'm sure Jimmy Door is perfectly aware of this,
Speaker 2: but they're he's playing dumb right now.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And so when you look at you know, brandeis
Speaker 1: being a Francist and he presents the eighteen ninety one
Speaker 1: Blackstone Petition to Woodrow Wilson, so you know, sort of
Speaker 1: underlining what's going on in Central Europe it's due to
Speaker 1: the Frankests.
Speaker 2: And he's, yes, he's what do we see here?
Speaker 1: Maybe a dialectic right, They're absolutely they're creating the situation
Speaker 1: and then establishing international law. Really, this is really out
Speaker 1: of the out of all of this comes to the
Speaker 1: United Nations.
Speaker 4: And I don't remember anymore. That's that.
Speaker 1: And Candace speaks again at five, so we're gonna just
Speaker 1: let her talk a little bit. Cool and I think
Speaker 1: we you and I went over this video last week, right, I.
Speaker 2: Think it was a different Candisillans video about her sitting
Speaker 2: at a different desk or something like that and on
Speaker 2: her show or something.
Speaker 4: Okay, and be out of the realm of possibility at
Speaker 4: all that a small group of people does thrill kills
Speaker 4: when all your leaders cackle about the murders they do
Speaker 4: in front of the point here. That's why I always
Speaker 4: ask me, that's conspiratorial. Happened Francis or pieces of ship,
Speaker 4: But because if someone no one knows about, that's really second.
Speaker 2: They're trying to blame the Frankest for something that happened
Speaker 2: in twelve ninety when there were no Francists. They're there
Speaker 2: and to fort like we're talking about like the you know,
Speaker 2: Simon and Trent type of stuff where they're bleeding as
Speaker 2: Christian child for their for their h you know, their
Speaker 2: passover that the timeline doesn't even make sense.
Speaker 1: But they're not.
Speaker 2: They're trying to misdirect this stuff that happens with this
Speaker 2: ritual killing of children as being a frankest thing. Frankest
Speaker 2: do this, But that's not where it comes from. It
Speaker 2: comes from Judaism.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's this, and they're trying to show that it's
Speaker 1: this radical fringe group and don't blame the entire race
Speaker 1: of Jews, which we aren't, you know, but uh to
Speaker 1: try to say that these Francists weren't Jewish, We've over
Speaker 1: and over and over discredited that claim, you.
Speaker 4: See, but go look at how we starved have to
Speaker 4: be the kids in Iraq and what's your name said
Speaker 4: it was worth it?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 4: Why would it be out of the realm of possibility
Speaker 4: at all that a small group of people does thrill
Speaker 4: kills when all your leaders cackle about the murders they
Speaker 4: do in front of your face. That's what I always
Speaker 4: ask people to go, that's conspiratorial. Have you been around
Speaker 4: for the last twenty years and watch what they do openly?
Speaker 4: You don't think they do stuff privately?
Speaker 3: All right, let's let's let let's listen to this again.
Speaker 6: I'll sorry for getting to the Christian Israel as a
Speaker 6: country I know you've read like the short version in
Speaker 6: the classroom and it was like, oh, the Holocaust happened,
Speaker 6: and then we realized it Israel.
Speaker 7: Interesting, No, that's not how it went down. That's not
Speaker 7: how it went down at the f all.
Speaker 3: Okay, so I at least know that. I know that
Speaker 3: I used to think that the Holocaust happened and then
Speaker 3: they're like, oh, we need to give Israel a state.
Speaker 3: That is not what happened. I know that Zionism goes
Speaker 3: back into the eighteen hundred, so I love.
Speaker 4: Yeah. Yeah, are Christians here that are the Christian Zionist
Speaker 4: So you're pat Robertson people, and you're all the eighties
Speaker 4: that if you look at religious channels now they condemn
Speaker 4: them prosperity gospel. Maybe you've seen, Yes, that's all part
Speaker 4: of the same.
Speaker 1: What happened to Freeze? Oh yeah, I have lost your audio.
Speaker 1: Oh sorry, So did you hear the term prosperity gospel there?
Speaker 4: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Yeah, that triggered my curiosity totally.
Speaker 1: And I said that this morning. I said, I bet
Speaker 1: you Daniel will be triggered by this term, just the
Speaker 1: same as I did something that a lot of researchers
Speaker 1: might just glaze over and keep listening. But I stopped
Speaker 1: because I wanted to know what prosperity gospel is while
Speaker 1: you're talking about the evangelicals like Pat Robertson. So I'm
Speaker 1: just gonna share the screen because I went to the
Speaker 1: wiki page of prosperity Gospel to see what it is.
Speaker 2: And this is what you out there when you when
Speaker 2: you come across a term, when you're reading and doing
Speaker 2: your research, do this, you know, seek out these these things.
Speaker 2: Don't just gloss over it like oh I should know this. No,
Speaker 2: don't don't do that.
Speaker 1: Find out you know. Yeah. And what I do is
Speaker 1: if it's something I don't know, I clearly draw the
Speaker 1: line and go learn it right, especially if it's just
Speaker 1: a simple definition.
Speaker 4: This is key like.
Speaker 1: The cast spells in the spelling and definitions of words here, absolutely, sir.
Speaker 1: For those reading ahead here, it's also known as prosperity theology.
Speaker 1: You can see that they use the word prosperity gospel,
Speaker 1: the health and wealth gospel, gospel of success, seed faith, gospel,
Speaker 1: faith movement, or word faith. So it's a religious belief
Speaker 1: among some Charismatic Christians that financial blessing and physical well
Speaker 1: being are always the will of God for them, and
Speaker 1: that faith, positive scriptural confession, and giving to charitable and
Speaker 1: religious causes will increase one's material wealth. Material and especially
Speaker 1: financial success is seen as a sign of divine grace
Speaker 1: or favor. So you donate your church and it's it's
Speaker 1: going to make you closer to.
Speaker 2: God, all right, material this realm not of God, but
Speaker 2: it's but it's promoted by the Christians, who is so
Speaker 2: probably opposite of what Jesus would have thought.
Speaker 1: Right, it says Prosperity theology has been criticized by leaders
Speaker 1: from various Christian denominations, including within some Pentecostal and Charismatic movements,
Speaker 1: who maintain that it is irresponsible, promotes idolatry in its
Speaker 1: contrary to the Bible. So there's there's resistance even within
Speaker 1: Christian denominations as to you know, the validity of it all.
Speaker 1: And so you read a little further and we start
Speaker 1: getting into healing revivals of the fifties, and a little
Speaker 1: later down it's it's introduces us to another new definition
Speaker 1: called new thought. So, if you're familiar with our work,
Speaker 1: we show in nineteen twelve, nineteen thirteen, all of these
Speaker 1: progressive fathers write books with the word new in it.
Speaker 1: The new Democracy, the new Republic, the new freedom is
Speaker 1: Woodrow Wilson, the new Nationalism is Theodore.
Speaker 9: Roosevelt, the other in other words, the redefinition of the
Speaker 9: new history, the new spirit that they do all of this,
Speaker 9: and then guess who the Fabians.
Speaker 1: What the original name of the Fabian Society was but
Speaker 1: the Fellowship of the New Life. And so now we
Speaker 1: see new Thought, and who's here but guys like Joel
Speaker 1: Austein or a Roberts. These are your televangelism, right, This
Speaker 1: this myth and that that'll comes from the Christian Zionist movement. Yeah,
Speaker 1: exemplified by Andrew Carnegie Gospel of wealth.
Speaker 2: But to Carnegie in the and the roth Stiles and
Speaker 2: the Rockefellers. Due to our educational system of our New Thought, Yeah,
Speaker 2: there you.
Speaker 1: Go, televangelism direct connection to people like Jim Baker. We
Speaker 1: really got to turn the TV off on all of
Speaker 1: these imposters. Okay. So it's amazing what you can sort
Speaker 1: of understand when you stop a video and see what
Speaker 1: the heck they mean. And this is a removal from
Speaker 1: You can feel it when you're being removed from information.
Speaker 1: The moment, they're using terms that you're unfamiliar with. So
Speaker 1: you know, I have a huge vocab list that I
Speaker 1: started fifteen years ago, and I said, well, if I'm
Speaker 1: going to get into this, I better start really understanding
Speaker 1: the languages. And so anytime I came across the word
Speaker 1: I didn't understand, I threw it into my vocabulary and
Speaker 1: I put the definition of it. And it builds over
Speaker 1: time so that your vocabulary expands, you become, you know,
Speaker 1: more attractive in the way that you speak, and you
Speaker 1: can make a big difference.
Speaker 2: Yeah, for sure, you have a deeper understanding of what
Speaker 2: you're material, your topic is, for sure.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And so then you don't come across as a
Speaker 1: guy that isn't really sure of what's going on, like
Speaker 1: like this guy that we were listening to in the
Speaker 1: Jimmy Dore video.
Speaker 2: Right, the collection of points but not really a bit
Speaker 2: a way to utilize them in a in a in
Speaker 2: a manner where you're utilizing those points to get somewhere. Right,
Speaker 2: It's like I know these bullet points, but I don't
Speaker 2: know how they work, you know what I mean. So
Speaker 2: it's it's better when you have that type of deeper
Speaker 2: understanding of course obviously because I didn't argue too.
Speaker 1: Yes, because they're going to try to fool you. I mean,
Speaker 1: they have knowledge that they kept from us through our
Speaker 1: education system in that liberal arts degree, grammar, logic, rhetoric,
Speaker 1: and on understanding how to communicate. They took that away
Speaker 1: from us, so we have to build it up in
Speaker 1: us again.
Speaker 2: And you know it's funny is they started this off
Speaker 2: by saying Canda Owans like they Jimmy Door introduced this,
Speaker 2: but Candace Owans lost their fing mind. So it's like
Speaker 2: they already they already they already put that that onus,
Speaker 2: that that that cloud, that curtain over the top of
Speaker 2: everything that she's about to say. But even though they're
Speaker 2: agreeing with some of what she's saying, they start off by,
Speaker 2: you know, denigrating her, yeah, if that's the right word,
Speaker 2: making her a victim, right, turning her into oh, she's
Speaker 2: just a maniac, you know?
Speaker 1: Is this is this where you wanting to be right here? Yep?
Speaker 1: So there's some this guy's dropping f bombs all over
Speaker 1: the place. Are you okay with that? Yeah?
Speaker 3: Is that?
Speaker 4: Uh?
Speaker 3: Is that?
Speaker 4: Uh?
Speaker 1: Patrickt bet David. I don't even know who these people
Speaker 1: are actually so so.
Speaker 2: Or is there something else that was supposed to go
Speaker 2: down with what Candace was talking about was that.
Speaker 1: Can you say that again? For me? Was was Were
Speaker 1: we done with the candas owns part? It wasn't more
Speaker 1: that to it?
Speaker 2: Are you gonna go back to it?
Speaker 1: Oh? He mentions prosperity gospel. Maybe we should let him
Speaker 1: just talk for a second. Yeah, hang on, let me
Speaker 1: see if I canna share a screen. There is more
Speaker 1: to talk about actually on that.
Speaker 4: And we were at you.
Speaker 1: It's kind of slow. We were at about six minutes.
Speaker 4: Yep, group, it's fake. A lot of it's intel agency
Speaker 4: connected where she should like what I would include with
Speaker 4: what she's saying because it sounds like she's picking on
Speaker 4: sounds great. Keep in mind this is also how America
Speaker 4: was founded. Like before we pick on Israel too much,
Speaker 4: America is also foundedide by the genocides done by a
Speaker 4: weird club called Freemasons and every remember Kanye wore a
Speaker 4: crown of thorns that was blasphemy. Yeah, there's a painting
Speaker 4: of George Washington in the rotunda where he's God. Okay,
Speaker 4: that's not blasphemed.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the rotund he didn't have anything to do with that.
Speaker 4: And they'll be that was just symbolic. Okay, well Kanye
Speaker 4: was just symbolic with dumb thing. So she's Catholic. So
Speaker 4: what happens is if you're gonna come where you show
Speaker 4: favoritism to one of these sides and you have understand
Speaker 4: all these factions vying for power in the world, they're
Speaker 4: gonna tell you the worst stuff about the enemy. Like
Speaker 4: if I don't like China, I'm gonna tell you what's
Speaker 4: bad about China. Right, So from China's gonna tell you
Speaker 4: how America is bad. And if if you only come
Speaker 4: from that perspective and don't understand the whole thing is
Speaker 4: like that, it's gonna sound like you're just being crazy.
Speaker 4: But the whole thing is like that. It's not just
Speaker 4: Israel America itself. If anyone's being reasonable, look at the
Speaker 4: history is founded by some pretty strange people.
Speaker 3: Okay, all right, so let's let's.
Speaker 8: Before they decided to establish Israel as a country.
Speaker 5: I know you've read like the short version in the
Speaker 5: classroom and it was like, oh, the Holocaust happened, and
Speaker 5: then we realize it is really interesting.
Speaker 7: No, that's not how it went down. That's not how
Speaker 7: it went down at the f all.
Speaker 6: Okay, Catholics and Christians were going missing on Passover, and
Speaker 6: then they would find bodies okay, across Europe and they
Speaker 6: were able to trace them back to Jews blood Bibel.
Speaker 6: They weren't juice, Okay, these were Frankests. And so just
Speaker 6: like Leo Frank killed Mary Fagan on Passover back in
Speaker 6: nineteen thirteen, nineteen fourteen, I can't remember the exact date,
Speaker 6: he did it during Passover. For a reason, this Frankest cult,
Speaker 6: which was masquerading behind Jews, still participates in.
Speaker 8: This shit to this day.
Speaker 7: Okay.
Speaker 6: That's a small nation that is the size of New Jersey. Okay,
Speaker 6: why would you want the pedophiles to flee there? Why
Speaker 6: would you want the pedophiles to be pro greating hmm?
Speaker 8: Unless unless the nation of Israel may have been established
Speaker 8: by some Francists as looking like Theodore Hertzel's family was
Speaker 8: from the exact same area in Moravia and in Bohemia
Speaker 8: where the Frankest cult was founded.
Speaker 2: The Moravian and Bohemian Brethrens were founded by Francists. The
Speaker 2: one that converted and got baptized at the same time
Speaker 2: in the seventeen fifties by at the same time to
Speaker 2: Jacob frank did so they could infiltrate. But again, this
Speaker 2: is just acceleration Judaism. It's not separate. It's that's the issue.
Speaker 2: I mean, I thought at one point the Frankest were
Speaker 2: an offshoot because they they distanced themselves. But that's that's
Speaker 2: just part of the part of the part of the facade.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and so we'll get into the Frankest. He's Jimmy's
Speaker 1: gonna actually start reading from the wiki page of Frankism here.
Speaker 1: It's pretty neat crazy.
Speaker 6: When you get into his family that like maybe Theodore
Speaker 6: Hertel who wrote in a book that he didn't care
Speaker 6: how many Jews had to die for him to get
Speaker 6: the issue, like.
Speaker 8: Maybe he was not actually a Torah worshiping Jew.
Speaker 7: I don't know.
Speaker 6: I'm just throwing out some ideas here and not some ideas.
Speaker 6: I mean, I've read a time of books and I
Speaker 6: figured it out.
Speaker 8: Okay.
Speaker 3: I am just like so over the.
Speaker 6: Israel Is our ally in front if another person says
Speaker 6: that stupid statement, I'm going to personally punch you in
Speaker 6: the face.
Speaker 7: It's going to be me.
Speaker 8: That's a joke, don't take this video off Twitter wink.
Speaker 4: So what she's just look at a one small piece
Speaker 4: of the puzzle and like blown away by it. But like, yo,
Speaker 4: go look at the again?
Speaker 2: Why why is see? Why you know this? This this
Speaker 2: this misdirection of well, look at what happens. It's like
Speaker 2: these guys are bad too, These guys were bad, Like
Speaker 2: what about what they We're not talking about someone else's,
Speaker 2: you know whatever, We're talking about this specifically. Stick it
Speaker 2: to the topic. Man, other guys do bad stuff too.
Speaker 2: It's not yeah, and whore's influencing them? Where's a game
Speaker 2: funded by oh my god, the same goddamn people?
Speaker 1: And what is that but a two quoquay logical fallacy?
Speaker 5: Me?
Speaker 1: What about you? Yeah, it's one of those distractions I
Speaker 1: remember as a kid my parents would always fall into.
Speaker 1: You know, yeah, and you're arguing, arguing with your your
Speaker 1: wife or whatever. Yeah a lot, it's like me, what
Speaker 1: about you? And then you're in a quagmire you can't
Speaker 1: escape from unless you upgrade your intelligence really right and
Speaker 1: understand that that's a logical fallacy and don't allow yourselves
Speaker 1: to be distracted by it.
Speaker 4: Absolutely, It's just was not he was secular Okay, not
Speaker 4: a tour you know, you don't.
Speaker 1: And I was also going to say that, you know,
Speaker 1: we talk about this being a war on the mind
Speaker 1: and an information war. This is what we're seeing. This
Speaker 1: is like trench warfare right here.
Speaker 2: And I've always said that the Francs were the ones
Speaker 2: that founded at Israel because there's Zionis and Zionism that
Speaker 2: comes out of Frankism. But this often was deeper than that.
Speaker 2: Frankism and the Luriankabbala wouldn't have been as attractive to
Speaker 2: so many people if it wasn't for the fact that
Speaker 2: it was based on stuff that they had been practicing
Speaker 2: for long before that ever came about. Like where did
Speaker 2: he derive these this information from? And it's not to
Speaker 2: say that all Jews is support it, it's not. But
Speaker 2: it's also you got to understand that it's not separate.
Speaker 2: It's it's it's just a higher extremism of it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly, don't have to be to be to go
Speaker 1: to Israel.
Speaker 4: You don't have to be a tour observing Jew, I
Speaker 4: know how.
Speaker 3: So she said, so let me just get clarity of
Speaker 3: what she's saying. She's saying that Israel was founded by Frankists, correct,
Speaker 3: Is that what she's say?
Speaker 1: Okay, so we'll just zip over here and I'm going to.
Speaker 2: Show you and look at like Ben Gurion on up,
Speaker 2: like you have nothing but terrorist leaders of that of
Speaker 2: that country all the way up.
Speaker 1: Right from the beginning. So here's the landing page. Can
Speaker 1: you see the landing page of BP. Yes, So American
Speaker 1: Zionism in the Making of Israel Part three is where
Speaker 1: we see the brand Eyes is really the primary author
Speaker 1: of the BLL four Declaration, which is the founding document
Speaker 1: of Israel, November second, nineteen seventeen. So this is why
Speaker 1: she's she's saying that if somebody says Israel was created
Speaker 1: in nineteen forty eight, she's going to punch him in
Speaker 1: the face. I feel very similar to that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, there are our allies. Well, there are allies because
Speaker 2: they own us. That's the only reason it make some allies.
Speaker 2: Because the same banking family that holds the purse strings
Speaker 2: for every goddamn thing, yeah, owns literally owns us. Instead
Speaker 2: does black Rock and all those other people they're also
Speaker 2: fucking Zionis.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and Blackrock and all of that is the furthest
Speaker 1: extension of all of this progressive imagination. So we've sort
Speaker 1: of pulled out of the Founding Document of Israel here.
Speaker 2: That's a good termination.
Speaker 1: I like that.
Speaker 2: Pardon I said that was a good That was a
Speaker 2: good term. Progressive imagination, right, right.
Speaker 1: So it's addressed to the rothschild This is the Founding
Speaker 1: Document of Israel and so there you go. That's enough
Speaker 1: to prove that the Rothschilds were involved. Ah. And so
Speaker 1: you know, in turn frank Ism, but brand Eye, coming
Speaker 1: from Frankism, is the primary author of the Balfour Declaration
Speaker 1: and the Palestine Economic Corporation. So this is this group
Speaker 1: here that we've discussed before. Brand Eyes actually led this group.
Speaker 1: This is the Joint Distribution Committee with a relief committee.
Speaker 1: There was three that uh started, what's the word they're, well,
Speaker 1: they're they're they're looking for funding. So they've established these
Speaker 1: three different groups of people that have targeted Jewelry. And
Speaker 1: so there's American Jews and then there's New immigrant Jews
Speaker 1: and another type of I think the Jewish organizations. And
Speaker 1: so they called it the Joint Distribution Committee because they're
Speaker 1: accepting charity from all of these Jews and they're putting it,
Speaker 1: funneling it right into Palestine in the creation of what
Speaker 1: Brandeis and Rothschild and Baron Herscher doing heim Weitzman's involved
Speaker 1: too in the creation of the actual infrastructure of you know,
Speaker 1: the first Jewish settlements. So Brandeis is the leader of
Speaker 1: this group. Here on the right we see a major
Speaker 1: funder of the Bolsheviks, Jacob Schiff. And then who everybody
Speaker 1: thinks is the founder of the Federal Reserve, Felix Warburg.
Speaker 2: Right, and you have here's the other interesting part about that.
Speaker 2: The Schiff family and the Rothschilds lived in the same
Speaker 2: house in Frankfurt on the main.
Speaker 1: Right, so you can see a direct connection. And there's
Speaker 1: a painting because Lewis Marshall is a key brand Ey
Speaker 1: lieutenant wasn't available when they took the picture, so they
Speaker 1: got a painter to sort of change the arrangement of
Speaker 1: some of these people. Seated fit Lewis brand or Lewis
Speaker 1: Marshall in and then took some artistic liberty here and
Speaker 1: put a globe in there.
Speaker 2: And I would say, just so people don't think that
Speaker 2: you're like, well, let me put it this way. The
Speaker 2: Francists were in fact absolutely one hundred percent the infiltration
Speaker 2: they were. That's that's not something I'm arguing that the
Speaker 2: Rothschild's converted to Frankism. Frankism was part of the the
Speaker 2: founding and building and dispersal of the what we would
Speaker 2: call the Illuminati through the flu the massonic lodges, you know,
Speaker 2: in that they run as a single hive mind entity.
Speaker 2: So having brand Eyes here was an extension of the
Speaker 2: Rothschild initiative and agenda. So absolutely, one hundred percent all
Speaker 2: these people can be traced back to Frankism and that
Speaker 2: that is a key here, that Francism is behind all this.
Speaker 2: But calling it Zionism isn't changing that. What is what
Speaker 2: a Frankist is. It's just a different word with maybe
Speaker 2: a veneer of a different you know, theology or philosophy,
Speaker 2: but it's not different. My statement is simply that they
Speaker 2: would have never gotten off the ground if it wasn't
Speaker 2: for the fact that they were heavily based in the
Speaker 2: founding ideals of Torah, Judaism and so on. The Kabbala
Speaker 2: wouldn't have been a kabbala if it wasn't part of that.
Speaker 1: You know. Yeah, and we're seeing a connection between Freemasonry,
Speaker 1: Cabbala and the highest levels of university education through the
Speaker 1: education that they removed. So the liberal arts is a
Speaker 1: key aspect to understanding this because with a liberal arts
Speaker 1: master's degree, you can see the world a lot diferently
Speaker 1: and you can actually manipulate people. So you see a
Speaker 1: lot of these guys are a master of Liberal Arts
Speaker 1: through the highest universities in America, Harvard, Yale, in Kapa.
Speaker 2: And just so people know, like in this book here
Speaker 2: pre Scrappy and Babylon, I show the history bringing leading
Speaker 2: up to the Frankism and how it all interconnects. So
Speaker 2: I'm I am. I am by no means, you know,
Speaker 2: saying that they're they're not behind all this. I am
Speaker 2: specifically saying that they are. But what I'm saying also
Speaker 2: is that they're roots. You know, it's a Saturn cult.
Speaker 2: It's this Yao saba oath. It's this imposter cult of
Speaker 2: absolute maniacs, the god fears, if you want to call
Speaker 2: them Yahoo whatever, what do you want to call them?
Speaker 2: It's that same Saturn cult and it infiltrates all three
Speaker 2: Abrahamic religions because they're all based on the same core
Speaker 2: and they're manipulated by what do you ever you want
Speaker 2: to call it, want to call him fracas, you want
Speaker 2: call him juice, you want to call them whatever it is,
Speaker 2: or the or the or the fake juice if people
Speaker 2: want to call it that. The looks multitude who claims
Speaker 2: to be in ethnicity and really they're whatever they are, bandits,
Speaker 2: merchants and thieves, you know.
Speaker 1: Yeah, So this picture in the back I think is Lincoln.
Speaker 1: So there's a weird connection to Lincoln there again. And
Speaker 1: so we know that Lewis Brande is his uncle, the
Speaker 1: guy that he changes his middle name to.
Speaker 2: Are you sure? Are you showing a different screen? I
Speaker 2: don't think it's a show right now, We're still.
Speaker 1: On the okayang on?
Speaker 7: Yeah?
Speaker 2: So yeah, I think you have to use a different
Speaker 2: type of Jared screen when you when you move out
Speaker 2: away from a page.
Speaker 1: Let me see if I can do this right?
Speaker 4: I have to do what?
Speaker 5: All?
Speaker 7: Right?
Speaker 2: So I gotta click into it. So if you're gonna
Speaker 2: if you're gonna navigate a little bit, uh, I goes
Speaker 2: to the one that says entire screen, and then if
Speaker 2: you need audio, click the audio because that one on
Speaker 2: the chrome tab it's already clicked over. But if you
Speaker 2: hit the entire screen. One have to click the box
Speaker 2: that you see to make it highlight in blue, and
Speaker 2: then it says auto also share you know, system audio.
Speaker 2: If you need audio, you exlide it. If you don't,
Speaker 2: you don't, and then you sit here and then it'll
Speaker 2: pop up and they'll be able to navigate and it'll
Speaker 2: take the whole page with it, so it'll move with
Speaker 2: you instead of be stuck on Monday.
Speaker 1: Okay, so do you see that group of people now?
Speaker 2: Yes?
Speaker 1: Okay, so this is a group of people I'm talking about.
Speaker 1: So it's a first it was a picture, the actual photograph,
Speaker 1: and when you zoom into this thing, I'm pretty sure
Speaker 1: it is. Of course, we're going to get that a
Speaker 1: little mortifier over it. I'm pretty sure that that's a
Speaker 1: picture of Lincoln. Obviously we haven't been able to confirm that.
Speaker 1: But this is the painting underneath it I was talking about,
Speaker 1: in which Louis Marshall's actually inserted into there. And then
Speaker 1: they take some artistic liberty and put a globe in
Speaker 1: there for some reason, own the world. So there's Jacob Schiff,
Speaker 1: you know, Felix Warburg head of the table with the
Speaker 1: world between them.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and then Francis were one percent responsible. Slash Jesuits
Speaker 2: were responsible for the French Revolution, the Bolshevik Revolution, all
Speaker 2: that the Francists are behind that, and I talk about
Speaker 2: that in the book.
Speaker 1: So the JDC distributed tens of millions to the early
Speaker 1: construction efforts in Palestine through the wartime donations of three
Speaker 1: distinct communities. This is what I was talking about earlier.
Speaker 1: To supply capital and credit, assuming a credit structure where
Speaker 1: none had existed before. One of the first things they
Speaker 1: do is a system of credit. Its first perspectives stated
Speaker 1: that the company recognized that the extension of credit facilities
Speaker 1: was a first vital necessity in Palestine and of the
Speaker 1: utmost consequence in its economic upbuilding. So it's like the
Speaker 1: foundational girders of all of it. The American Jewish Committee
Speaker 1: targeted for funds already settled American Jews, while the Central
Speaker 1: Relief Committee looked to the New Jewish Immigrant and the
Speaker 1: Union of Jewish Orthodox Congregations for funding, and the People's
Speaker 1: Relief Committee solicited Jewish labor socialist groups like the Amalgamated
Speaker 1: Clothing Workers or the Federation of Jewish Farmers. So they're
Speaker 1: going around asking people to help fund for the creation
Speaker 1: of a Jewish homeland in Palestine, and.
Speaker 2: The Havar Agreement aka the Transfer Agreement was crucial in
Speaker 2: getting people over there. And it was I look at
Speaker 2: it as being like what they what they claimed the
Speaker 2: Templars used to do, like the safe passage to Jerusalem
Speaker 2: type of deal, right, you know, where they they did.
Speaker 2: They did an exodus in a sense, but they wanted
Speaker 2: to go. They were all of their assets were secured
Speaker 2: and they were brought there to help start cultivating the
Speaker 2: land and uh and building it up. You know, yes,
Speaker 2: that last three years. I think it would think it
Speaker 2: was like thirty three to thirty six. But then when
Speaker 2: things started to kick off and Europe, that's when it
Speaker 2: kind of got sour.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And actually in that video they talk about dual citizenship,
Speaker 1: and you know, Brandeis is really the popularizer of dual loyalty.
Speaker 4: Yep.
Speaker 1: And that's a key thing right there for sure. And
Speaker 1: this is really the the persuading of Americans to be
Speaker 1: especially Christian Americans, to be more in support of a
Speaker 1: Jewish Homelet mm hm. The the the.
Speaker 2: That that that's that's another like that that deception and
Speaker 2: then tying it in and it all has so much
Speaker 2: is involved in the religion here to manipulate other people
Speaker 2: to push their agenda forward. You know, they need they
Speaker 2: need the other two Abrahamic religions and their followers to
Speaker 2: basically bring them over to the goal line. Right, and
Speaker 2: once we're not useful anymore, once they've achieved that, what happens.
Speaker 2: And and then the handle when you were talking about
Speaker 2: how her h she said Hurtzel didn't care how many
Speaker 2: Jews had to die to get them there. That that
Speaker 2: sounds like what I believe, if I if I understand
Speaker 2: that the term, uh, the Hannibal directive enough well enough
Speaker 2: is that you know, people are expendable if it gets
Speaker 2: you to your goal, and it doesn't matter who they are, your,
Speaker 2: your people, children, whatever.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 1: So Brandeis created the Palestine Economic Corporation with Bernard Flexner,
Speaker 1: Julius Simon, Robert Zold, Jacob Schiff, Felix Warburg and other
Speaker 1: wealthy New York German Jews. So there's a connection to
Speaker 1: the Flexner brothers.
Speaker 2: Felix in in Germany and and and Paul was in America.
Speaker 1: Is that how that works? I don't know. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: think there was.
Speaker 2: I think there was maybe potentially three brothers. I think
Speaker 2: there might have been another five. There's five, just like
Speaker 2: the there's more than three. Uh.
Speaker 1: And we see that here, you know, with Bernard Baruk,
Speaker 1: the Flexners, it's these little groups of five, and and
Speaker 1: even Joseph Goldmark, he has seven daughters. And they all
Speaker 1: sort of take certain aspects of society and start shifting
Speaker 1: it in a coordinated manner. So we see that they
Speaker 1: use their children yea. And you know, the Warburgs are
Speaker 1: a great example of that, as the Rothschilds are too.
Speaker 1: So within that corporation were formed the necessary institutions and
Speaker 1: utilities to begin establishing the necessary infrastructure for working Jewish
Speaker 1: community in Palestine. The Central Bank of Cooperative Institutions in
Speaker 1: Palestine Limited, the Economic Board of Palestine of London, this
Speaker 1: is probably their funding, the Executive arm the Palestine Jewish
Speaker 1: Colonization Association that is Rothschild and Palestine Mortgage and Credit
Speaker 1: Bank Limited. So the Palestine Economic Corporation that's founded by
Speaker 1: Brandeis and those names above, working in conjunction with both
Speaker 1: Baron de Rothschild's PICA and the Whitzman's Jewish Agency, constructed
Speaker 1: modern methods of agriculture at a time when industry was
Speaker 1: largely non existent in the area. The PEC grew their
Speaker 1: pioneering country and such feeds fields as credit for agricultural
Speaker 1: and industrial enterprise, housing provision, town planning, and water supply.
Speaker 1: So Brandi is a US Supreme Court Justice frankest leader
Speaker 1: of international Zionism at the time taking over for hertzel's headquarters.
Speaker 1: The Provisional Executive Committee on General Zionist Affairs is working
Speaker 1: hand in hand with the House of Rothschild in establishing
Speaker 1: the first infrastructure in Palestine. So the only thing left
Speaker 1: now to prove is that he was the main author
Speaker 1: of the Balfour Declaration.
Speaker 2: And let me just posit it to remark on the
Speaker 2: fact that you've done all this work on your vultbroofpub
Speaker 2: dot com. And that's I mean, this is a great
Speaker 2: resource for people who want to know more of the details.
Speaker 1: Yeah, for sure, we're showing ways to communicate with your family.
Speaker 1: If you're the black sheep, there's ways that you can
Speaker 1: introduce your argument that is sophisticated and grown up and
Speaker 1: hard to argue. And so that's what we did. We
Speaker 1: wanted to try to make this as respectable as we
Speaker 1: can and as far away from conspiratorial theory as possible.
Speaker 1: And so that's what letters like this do. This establishes
Speaker 1: knowledge rather than belief. And here's a letter addressed to
Speaker 1: Felix Warburg in which Lewis Brandei says, I got to
Speaker 1: step down from those two groups or the three groups
Speaker 1: that we were talking about earlier with the Joint Distribution
Speaker 1: Committee because he was just confirmed as a US Supreme
Speaker 1: Court justice days before that. Mm hmm, both, yeah, just
Speaker 1: days before.
Speaker 2: That happened in the first place. Why was this this
Speaker 2: dually uh, you know, dual what do you call it?
Speaker 1: What they call it?
Speaker 2: Interest person? Why why was he Why was he allowed
Speaker 2: to just step right into an American politics and America
Speaker 2: and become a Supreme Court justice.
Speaker 1: Yep. And that's really, Daniel, the only argument that we
Speaker 1: need to make right, you know, that's enough for us
Speaker 1: to you know, rise up and say, Okay, we can't
Speaker 1: have this anymore. We can't have you know, social reform
Speaker 1: activists as Supreme Court justices anymore. We can see with
Speaker 1: one hundred years of hindsight where that's led us.
Speaker 4: All right.
Speaker 1: Completely, I'm providing some of the sources. These are all biographers,
Speaker 1: and some of this stuff is dissertations from the highest
Speaker 1: levels of education, so you can see that they're actually
Speaker 1: sharing the actual history dissertations to become phdst me.
Speaker 2: Let me let me throw a quote out there from
Speaker 2: Quiet and White. Weiseman myself. I talked about this in
Speaker 2: when I was talking to Max. But it says, we
Speaker 2: shall have Palestine, whether you wish it or not. You
Speaker 2: can hasten our arrival or retard it, but it would
Speaker 2: be better for you to help us, for unless you
Speaker 2: do so, our constructive power will be transformed into a
Speaker 2: destructive which will overturn the world right time.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and heim Weitzman impulsively kisses brand Eyes's hand when
Speaker 1: he finds out the plan, or he I'm sorry I didn't.
Speaker 2: I mean, I didn't cough up as a Luther.
Speaker 1: You could see here they're using social justice. It is
Speaker 1: social justice which Zionism represents, and every bit of that
Speaker 1: is the American ideals of the twentieth century. So here's
Speaker 1: progressivism and the convoluting of tradition and value. So social
Speaker 1: justice is you know, social science reform. This is really
Speaker 1: where it all comes from the critical theory of Western society.
Speaker 1: Immediately following Wilson's declaration of war on April sixth, nineteen seventeen,
Speaker 1: British Foreign Secretary Arthur Belfour led a diplomatic mission to Washington,
Speaker 1: landing on April twenty second, nineteen seventeen. And so who
Speaker 1: is the guy that he's most interested into talking to?
Speaker 1: Not Woodrow Wilson, not the Secretary of War Robert Lansing,
Speaker 1: but Lewis Brandeis. So Brandeis the eminent insider. Well, Kim
Speaker 1: Weizman was very much considered the outsider to Wilson's circle,
Speaker 1: where Whitesman struggled to get access even by repeated cable
Speaker 1: Brandeis arrived as an invited, an eminent guest, where Whitesman,
Speaker 1: because of his personality, hit serious diplomatic roadblocks. The People's
Speaker 1: attorney smooth political and personal tensions. Brandeis's personal influence was
Speaker 1: doubly important, for he combined the roles of a Jewish
Speaker 1: leader and a close advisor to President Wilson. When bellefour
Speaker 1: came to the United States to consult his new allies
Speaker 1: shortly after American America entered the war, the new British
Speaker 1: foreign minister made a point of meeting Brandeis. All contemporaries
Speaker 1: agree in regarding these meetings as being critical in opening
Speaker 1: up the last phase of the negotiations for a British
Speaker 1: pro Zionist policy declaration. You're talking about Palestine.
Speaker 2: And I think what we're looking at here, Dwayne, is
Speaker 2: that this this all points to the lead man that
Speaker 2: everybody was following, including in our own government, was Brandized
Speaker 2: because he was basically the spokesman for the Rothschilds who
Speaker 2: controlled all the controls everything, you know what I mean.
Speaker 1: And this actually explains a lot for Wilson historians too,
Speaker 1: because there's a couple of anomalies in his in his
Speaker 1: tenure the historians today still question, like his statements Voltay
Speaker 1: fasts on war. He was elected to a second term
Speaker 1: on keeping us out of war and within four months
Speaker 1: had pronounced war.
Speaker 2: That's in That's a that's I think another theme that
Speaker 2: was carried on with with FDR as well until the
Speaker 2: convenience of of the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and who's really the main primary guy in FDR's
Speaker 1: brain trust. But oh okay, Baroke, Felix, Frankfurter, it's all
Speaker 1: still the same guys, all Phi Beta Kappa, mostly all
Speaker 1: Harvard Law Review or Harvard Law School. How when did
Speaker 1: Brandeis die right before the Second War nineteen forty one?
Speaker 2: I think, oh forty one, Okay, so he wasn't there
Speaker 2: to uh, to propagate the the Holocaust victimhood.
Speaker 1: Then that was who. Yeah, Frankfurter was his key lieutenant.
Speaker 1: He was in the Warburgs and all of those guys
Speaker 1: were funding Frankfurter his professor professorship at Harvard Law School.
Speaker 1: They were all funding him. And so they funneled all
Speaker 1: of these law clerks and people going to school at
Speaker 1: Harvard to learn law. Their first clerk work was with
Speaker 1: either brand Eyes or Oliver Wendell Holmes. And Frankfurter was
Speaker 1: at the at the Fawcet, if you will. And so
Speaker 1: out of that group comes you know, Dean Atchison and
Speaker 1: a lot of these key wise Men. If anybody knows
Speaker 1: that book, The Wise Man, this is really where all
Speaker 1: of those guys come from. So it's really Brandy and.
Speaker 2: Pardon I said, it sounds like a synhedron to me,
Speaker 2: the wise Men, the elders, right, sure.
Speaker 1: Yeah, So when belfour came to the United States consult
Speaker 1: his new allies, shortly after America entered the ward of
Speaker 1: the new British Foreign Minister made a point of meeting Brandeis.
Speaker 1: Belle Four met with brand Eyes on at least two
Speaker 1: occasions during his Washington visit. Dates are a little convoluted,
Speaker 1: but that's my best guess right there. For surely the
Speaker 1: May seventh one and then the eleventh is I couldn't
Speaker 1: fully confirm, but it has definitely stated more than once.
Speaker 1: There was two meetings and a large stack of contemporary
Speaker 1: scholarship concurs as substantiated above by Ben Helper, professor of
Speaker 1: Near East Studies at Brandeis University itself, that these meetings
Speaker 1: between Brandeis and belfour were critical and served as a
Speaker 1: major coming together of Anglo Americans. So the one quote
Speaker 1: that I get from this book Paris nineteen nineteen, and
Speaker 1: one thing everybody needs to know is that Margaret McMillan
Speaker 1: is the great granddaughter of David Lloyd George. This guy
Speaker 1: right here, the British Prime Minister at the Paris Peace Conference.
Speaker 2: So I.
Speaker 1: Searched through the book the word Brandis and it comes
Speaker 1: up once on aage four twenty two. So you can
Speaker 1: see that that's controlled opposition, because if we're going to
Speaker 1: talk Paris Peace Conference and all of that, then Brandis
Speaker 1: must be mentioned. But she states here that brandeis in
Speaker 1: belfour were careful not to debate first rights to self
Speaker 1: determination between the jew and Arab, especially on numerical grounds,
Speaker 1: as the Hebrew then is now grossly outnumbered by his
Speaker 1: fellow Arab semi.
Speaker 2: Because it makes no sense to say, do you have
Speaker 2: any claim to it right exactly on a.
Speaker 1: Numerical because you'd lose immediately. And this is what they've
Speaker 1: been keeping from people for over one hundred years, that
Speaker 1: there's five over five hundred millions Semitic speaking Arabs, and
Speaker 1: they're eliminating the Arab, the largest population, from the conversation,
Speaker 1: just like they're geographically removing them from the area. Brand
Speaker 1: Is one of the first to actively promote dual loyalty
Speaker 1: between the US and Jewish and a Jewish homeland. Was
Speaker 1: very influential on Balfour. These guys are Zionists for sure,
Speaker 1: same with David Lloyd George. They're very into the idea
Speaker 1: of a Jewish homeland wielding all the authority vested within him.
Speaker 1: Brandeis an essential figure in the conception promotion and especially
Speaker 1: the consummation of the document most responsible for securing a
Speaker 1: final homeland for the jew So amazing work here man,
Speaker 1: here is here's the quote from Paris, nineteen nineteen belfour,
Speaker 1: and Louis brandeis a Supreme Court justice and the leading
Speaker 1: American Zionist, came up with an ingenious solution. It was
Speaker 1: wrong to use mere numerical self determination. A great many
Speaker 1: potential inhabitants of the Jewish home in Palestine still lived
Speaker 1: outside its borders, and Zionism, said Balfour, be it right
Speaker 1: or wrong, good or bad, is rooted in age long tradition.
Speaker 1: They in future hopes of far profounder important than the
Speaker 1: desires and prejudices of the seven hundred thousand Arabs who
Speaker 1: now inhabit that ancient land. Now, isn't that something right?
Speaker 1: So this, you know, when you look at the wording
Speaker 1: of the Balfour declaration, this is one phrase that I've memorized,
Speaker 1: it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which
Speaker 1: may prejudice the civil and religious rights of the existing
Speaker 1: non Jewish community is in Palestine. So there's a contradiction
Speaker 1: here when we look at what's going on today. No
Speaker 1: So what's the lie, the promise not to do anything
Speaker 1: or the other way? I highly doubt right. So this
Speaker 1: is a lie. And Lord Alfred Milner, who is the
Speaker 1: head of the Cecil Rhodes Foundation at this point, because
Speaker 1: Cecil Roads have died in nineteen oh two, he's the one,
Speaker 1: apparently according to this literature, that made sure that that
Speaker 1: actual sentence stays in there against the best wishes of
Speaker 1: the House of ross Child. And how guys is the
Speaker 1: mediator of all of.
Speaker 2: This, Frandises, mediator of all that. How deep have you
Speaker 2: gone into the Cecil Roads and the Rhodes scholars and
Speaker 2: all that stuff. I'm curious, yeah, big times.
Speaker 1: Some of my first early work was into you know,
Speaker 1: there's an article called how Secret Societies Control Our World?
Speaker 1: And I go deep into Cecil Roads and you know,
Speaker 1: the Scrabble for Africa eighteen and his secret society and
Speaker 1: his wishes from his final will and testament was to
Speaker 1: bring together America in Britain. The boy one head in
Speaker 1: New York and one head in London. And that's where
Speaker 1: they create the Council on Foreign Relations and the Royal
Speaker 1: Institute of International Affairs. At the Paris Peace Conference in
Speaker 1: nineteen nineteen. So it's the fulfillment of the last will
Speaker 1: and Testament of Cecil Roads bringing together the Anglo American establishment.
Speaker 1: You see the name Eustace Percy there. He's one of
Speaker 1: the key guys in the British War Department. He's also
Speaker 1: a resident at the House of Truth. Felix, Frankfurter and
Speaker 1: Brandeis are three of the four in the room when
Speaker 1: they make the final drafting of the Balfour Declaration. That
Speaker 1: means that three of the four in the room when
Speaker 1: they created Israel were House of Truth residents.
Speaker 2: Jesus and they say that it originated where Yeah, no,
Speaker 2: I can't originate it right here, guys.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so I've finished this story by showing just all
Speaker 1: of the other evidence that I couldn't really fit into
Speaker 1: the body of the work. So, you know, the night
Speaker 1: before Brandeis's election to the chair of the Provisional Executive
Speaker 1: Committee on General Ziis Affairs, this is Theodore Herzel's main
Speaker 1: international Zionist headquarters. He travels by boat with Horace W. Kalin,
Speaker 1: who introduces Brandeise to the idea of cultural pluralism or
Speaker 1: dual loyalty. Brandeis previously wrote disparagingly of hyphenated Americans who
Speaker 1: chose not to assimilate completely to American life, but now
Speaker 1: realizing their usefulness and supporting a Jewish homeland in Israel,
Speaker 1: completely flipped his view. This is on that boat trip.
Speaker 1: This is what they say that Horace W. Klin inspired
Speaker 1: him to now start talking about the importance of this connection.
Speaker 1: And where does Kalin come from? Okay, so Horace W. Kalin,
Speaker 1: I'm not sure where he comes from. I've done a
Speaker 1: little bit of research. I just don't remember what that is.
Speaker 1: But he is the founder of, as stated here, the
Speaker 1: Perashim and the Minora's secret Zionist societies at Harvard. So
Speaker 1: here they are creating Zionist secret societies on all of
Speaker 1: the campuses of all of these major universities, starting with Harvard.
Speaker 1: So just like Walter Littman is creating the Socialist Society
Speaker 1: secret societies on campuses of all of these universities, these
Speaker 1: guys and Brandeis are establishing secret Zionist societies. So Brandis
Speaker 1: here prominent in the creation of two Zionus secret societies
Speaker 1: on the university campus. A US Supreme Court justice. As
Speaker 1: odd as it sounds, it's true in Kaelin, we see
Speaker 1: one of the main influencers of Brandeis. Kaelin the one
Speaker 1: who introduces Brandeis to dual loyalty on a boat trip
Speaker 1: from Boston to New York the night before Brandeis is
Speaker 1: elected Chairman of International Zionism. So we conclude here that
Speaker 1: Louis D. Brandeis is the most influential historical figure in
Speaker 1: the creation of the country of Israel. His influence in
Speaker 1: both drafting the Balfour Declaration and the founding of the
Speaker 1: Palestine Economic Corporation show Brandise as the planet around which
Speaker 1: everyone else orbited. Brandis, according to Frank Furter, was the
Speaker 1: sage advisor to all and he proves it so. Brandeis's
Speaker 1: ability to establish the necessary official documentation while also applying
Speaker 1: the real tangible infrastructure for the creation of Israel, and
Speaker 1: his use of Federation of American Zionists, which is the
Speaker 1: Zionist Organization of America today, the AJAC, and the Provisional
Speaker 1: Executivemmittee on General Zionist Fairs, among others, to gather massive
Speaker 1: support for Jewish homeland in Palestine, all while being the
Speaker 1: most trusted advisor to US President places. Brandeis is influence
Speaker 1: even beyond that of the House of Rosschild's. In my
Speaker 1: opinion at least, he is a very effective tool. But
Speaker 1: it does speak to the Brandeis family having a little
Speaker 1: more clout or some aristocratic connections than your average Joe.
Speaker 2: Deeper than we know, right and how they actually costly.
Speaker 1: Much like Toxley, these guys are high level grand strategists.
Speaker 1: So his use of dual loyalty as a persuasion tactic
Speaker 1: still exists today, as we all are well aware. And
Speaker 1: in our follow up article Brandis Part four Christian Dispensationalism
Speaker 1: and a Social Gospel, we introduce you to who Brandeis
Speaker 1: called the father of Zionism, William Eugene Blackstone, and Brandeis's
Speaker 1: son in law of all people, is the father of
Speaker 1: the social Gospel, Walter ross and Bush and today his
Speaker 1: great grandson, they're both of theirs. Great grandson Brandises and
Speaker 1: Walter Rossian Bush's is the leader of the same movement today,
Speaker 1: same people. I don't know if I've got a picture
Speaker 1: of him. Nosationalist Part four you can see I I
Speaker 1: go through this and I show you exactly who's in
Speaker 1: control today. So there's a documents on the British Foreign
Speaker 1: policy nineteen nineteen to nineteen thirty nine. And this is
Speaker 1: where it actually talks about sort of breaks down the
Speaker 1: conversations and what actually happened in those moments that they
Speaker 1: created Israel. And it is in the body of this
Speaker 1: work somewhere. But you can see, let no American imagine
Speaker 1: that Zionism is inconsistent with patriotism. Patriotism is a key
Speaker 1: aspect of the progressive movement as well. There's no inconsistency
Speaker 1: between loyalty to America and loyalty to Jewelry.
Speaker 2: You know, that term only makes sense in the new
Speaker 2: America that they created on top of the founding founthers America,
Speaker 2: in which case that would be one hundred percentury. But
Speaker 2: you have to also recognize what happened to America for
Speaker 2: that to make sense.
Speaker 1: Yeah right, yeah, See, there's superfluous evidence showing that Brandeis
Speaker 1: is everything that we claim him to be. It's just
Speaker 1: the mainstream doesn't put it all together like we do.
Speaker 1: And this is from two Rothschilds and the Land of Israel,
Speaker 1: or the two Rothschilds in Palestine. This is one of
Speaker 1: the sources. So they're showing eighteen eighty seven. As early
Speaker 1: as then, Rothschilds is establishing the first early Jewish communities,
Speaker 1: and Brandeis comes on along a little later, as far
Speaker 1: as our research shows, and helps to establish it.
Speaker 2: Dwayne, could you imagine somebody like Door or somebody like
Speaker 2: Owens getting as deep as this on any of those topics.
Speaker 2: There's no way they would ever do that.
Speaker 1: No, I doubt it. But that's what we're trying to push.
Speaker 1: And so if we push and push and we can
Speaker 1: observe and watch their behavior, it tells us.
Speaker 2: A lot superficial barking points for the so that the
Speaker 2: the mass of people who can't really comprehend what they're
Speaker 2: even saying can go ahead and repeat somewhere and pair it.
Speaker 2: And that's that's all there. That's other after Yeah, and.
Speaker 1: We've got about ten minutes here, So I just want
Speaker 1: to go back to that video because it's where Jimmy
Speaker 1: Door kind of breaks it down a little bit, and
Speaker 1: it's interesting to watch somebody sort of come to grips
Speaker 1: with all of this. So you can see that video there. Yep, Okay,
Speaker 1: we're just gonna press play again.
Speaker 3: Right, But they were somehow and what and what's the
Speaker 3: connection to pedophilia.
Speaker 1: I need a minute.
Speaker 4: Well Francis did that. It's an inversion of It's like
Speaker 4: if you were doing Satanism as an inversion of Catholicism.
Speaker 4: It's an inversion of the Torah. So don't have sex
Speaker 4: with your kids, that's the thing in the Torah. Well
Speaker 4: we're going to do that. We're gonna eat bacon and
Speaker 4: molest kids. You know you're supposed to not do that.
Speaker 4: If you're not, you're not supposed to bless kids. A
Speaker 4: lot of it goes to Kabbala and stuff, and uh,
Speaker 4: that stretches into all all the religions. But just kind
Speaker 4: of telling like those sound like the sensational parts of
Speaker 4: the story. I don't know whether they're true or not,
Speaker 4: the murder thing, but if you're gonna tell just that
Speaker 4: part of it, you're leaving like huge chunks of things
Speaker 4: out and you're also implicating other other countries you might
Speaker 4: like when you're doing that.
Speaker 3: So, according to Wikipedia, says, Francism, also known as the
Speaker 3: Zulcheris sect was a Sabotine religious movement that are in
Speaker 3: the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries in Podolia, Poland. The movement
Speaker 3: was named after its founder, Jacob Frank a charismatic figure
Speaker 3: who rejected Jewish norms and preached that his followers should
Speaker 3: transgress moral boundaries.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 3: Frankism incorporated aspects of Christianity and Judaism, and at its
Speaker 3: height it had around fifty thousand followers, primarily Jews living
Speaker 3: in the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth, Central Europe, and Eastern Europe.
Speaker 3: Frank Is believed that Frank was the reincarnation of the
Speaker 3: Messianic soul and adopted his anti anti genomic, antiinomic doctrine
Speaker 3: that the Messiah must go into exile, which they understood
Speaker 3: as conversion to another religion.
Speaker 4: That's just to make up for Sabotaze Sebi converting to
Speaker 4: Islam and explain why it was okay and deism. It
Speaker 4: sounds like it's based on this, because changing religion back
Speaker 4: then would be like turning into a lizard.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 2: Wells for a second, because long before them, the Moranos
Speaker 2: were crypto Jews. The Conversos are crypto Jews. They did
Speaker 2: that in Spain, you know, they did. It's this, there's
Speaker 2: a long history prior to the zeb of this happening.
Speaker 2: Because they are infiltrators and they're and they're working the system.
Speaker 8: You know.
Speaker 1: Interesting, Yeah, and we know that this goes way back.
Speaker 1: This is probably, you know, one of the early pursuits
Speaker 1: of human control. You know, you have as soon as
Speaker 1: you have a group of humans large enough, some he's
Speaker 1: going to want to control it.
Speaker 3: Cold doctrines included deifying himself as part of a trinity,
Speaker 3: and other controversial concepts such as Neo Carpocratian purification through transgression.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 3: Any Jewish authorities in Poland excommunicated Frank and his followers.
Speaker 3: Frank was freed by the Russians in seventeen seventy three
Speaker 3: and eventually settled in Offenbach, where he dubbed himself Barn
Speaker 3: and was supported by as many followers. After Frank's death
Speaker 3: in seventeen ninety one, he was succeeded succeeded by his
Speaker 3: daughter Eve, who eventually spent all the money that the
Speaker 3: Francis had given her and was arrested for bankruptcy. I
Speaker 3: didn't know. She died in eighteen sixteen, and the sex
Speaker 3: deteriorated rapidly. Descendants of those members who were baptized merged
Speaker 3: with the Roman Catholic population.
Speaker 4: Well they can change religion at will.
Speaker 2: About the conversion or the the absorption into the Roman Catholicism.
Speaker 2: That that's that they touched on that And is this
Speaker 2: where they all combine at this moment just prior to
Speaker 2: the evening because in the seventeen fifties, uh, they had.
Speaker 1: Jacob Frank and.
Speaker 2: He was pushing. He said, he know that you know,
Speaker 2: our next step is to be is to convert into Christianity.
Speaker 2: And because the don't know or may some people say
Speaker 2: don't may, we're already established to infiltratee Islam. So they
Speaker 2: already you know, the next step is to uh control
Speaker 2: from the inside, steer, steer the direction of the Christians
Speaker 2: and the and the and the Catholics.
Speaker 1: And so listen to who he steers people towards.
Speaker 4: Here what this is called the old religion, and the
Speaker 4: old religion is encompasses. We get Mark Passio on he
Speaker 4: can explain a lot of this because he was uh.
Speaker 1: Wow, I think, yeah, they just dropped Mark Passio's name
Speaker 1: in there. It's much like when COVID hit and all
Speaker 1: of a sudden, David Ike was the spokesperson for all
Speaker 1: conspiracy theorists. It's like, well, what's going on here?
Speaker 2: Yeah, Passio. I mean it props to him for getting
Speaker 2: a shout out on Jimmy Door. I guess, you know,
Speaker 2: like there's no other people out there working on this stuff.
Speaker 1: I guess yeah, Mark himself is controlled opposition. He's the
Speaker 1: one that really is at the spearhead of, you know,
Speaker 1: popularizing the trivium, which I'm a total advocate of. But
Speaker 1: you try to talk to him about progressivism, he's going
Speaker 1: to fade out. So here he mentioned somebody else interesting.
Speaker 4: I told you a priest and the Church of Satan,
Speaker 4: not now, but he explains how they think and what
Speaker 4: their deal is. It's not like pulp fiction stuff. I mean,
Speaker 4: there's murders and stuff, but people don't realize what occult is.
Speaker 4: And if you look at Edward Burnet's or all the
Speaker 4: politics you watch, or Kamala making a.
Speaker 1: Okay, so he mentions Edward Burnet. And so we've already
Speaker 1: stated earlier that Freud was a frankest Sigmund Freud. Okay,
Speaker 1: this guy that has perpetuated the idea of ego and
Speaker 1: killing your father and raping your mother, right, all of
Speaker 1: these degenerate things. Well, his his great double nephew is
Speaker 1: the father of propaganda. Edward burneis.
Speaker 2: So.
Speaker 1: Now when you look at the early career of Edward
Speaker 1: Burne's in the early nineteen hundred's kind of right paralleling
Speaker 1: with brand Eyes establishing legislation through these manufacturing strikes. Nineteen
Speaker 1: tan Ish. Burne's is producing Broadway musicals, one of which
Speaker 1: is Annie. Okay, this is where Annie comes from. So
Speaker 1: this idea of name, yes, the idea of he didn't
Speaker 1: write it, I don't. I haven't been able to confirm that,
Speaker 1: but he's definitely the guy that's made it into a
Speaker 1: Broadway show.
Speaker 2: I just I just saw a clip yesterday of Shirley
Speaker 2: Temple singing a song to an adult man about how
Speaker 2: she thinks about him and wants to caress him and
Speaker 2: all this other shit. It was it was part of
Speaker 2: a movie, and she's talking to an adult male who's
Speaker 2: two inches from her face, and she's singing this song
Speaker 2: about how she's in love with him. Right, that's not
Speaker 2: a frankest freaking ideal or or fantasy. I don't know
Speaker 2: what the hell is yep, And so Hadophilia r in
Speaker 2: front of your face.
Speaker 1: Burnet's also produces several Broadway musicals, and all of them
Speaker 1: are pushing social taboos, things that you're not supposed to
Speaker 1: be talking about, like syphilis, sexually transmitted diseases. And so
Speaker 1: here we see a connection between the earliest movies that
Speaker 1: come to Hollywood in America. It's this demoralization that we've
Speaker 1: covered through film noir and horror. So this is a
Speaker 1: frankest idea too. I was saying to my wife this
Speaker 1: morning that, you know, the Weimar Republic and this the
Speaker 1: you know, some of the first movies are about machine
Speaker 1: Man and Machinetropolis is what I'm talking about, And so
Speaker 1: that's a silent film. But they're they're pushing this same
Speaker 1: degeneracy and Molock, feeding industrial workers into the mouth of
Speaker 1: a machine dragon called Moloch. This is before movies could
Speaker 1: even have speaking in them. They're still they're already establishing
Speaker 1: demorl or degeneracy and and demoralizing the American moviegoer. This
Speaker 1: is go and look at my Hidden in the Shadow
Speaker 1: of the Sun article that's on the Bulletproof landing page.
Speaker 1: We get in deep into the political slans in Los Angeles. Now,
Speaker 1: Allus Huxley was friends with them all and they.
Speaker 2: The lust to trigger right the lustfulness. They've used the woman,
Speaker 2: it's it's the lady Babylon stuff, it's the beast stuff.
Speaker 2: Then they got Moloch in there. It's it's very well
Speaker 2: put together. Uh yeah, to tell you their story, you know, and.
Speaker 1: It all comes from French German expressionism, and it's it
Speaker 1: means to its whole direction is to demoralize the American.
Speaker 2: And make the yes, that's a that's a that's a
Speaker 2: I don't know if it's a plank, but it's a
Speaker 2: Marxist idea too. Is to make everything drabbed ray and
Speaker 2: make the r ugly no inspiration of good ethical moral
Speaker 2: values anywhere, right, And.
Speaker 1: So why go into that that story about how you know,
Speaker 1: Hollywood was creating such questionable material through their storylines and
Speaker 1: plot lines that the American public started to gain an outrage,
Speaker 1: and so they created the Hayes Code and that was
Speaker 1: to you know, identify that these movies probably aren't the
Speaker 1: greatest things to be watching because of their social message.
Speaker 1: They're promoting, like cheating on your husband or wife, robbing banks,
Speaker 1: They're they're flipping our sentiments from the cop or the
Speaker 1: good guy to the bad guy. This is you know,
Speaker 1: gangster movies, the whole idea, the whole genres of film
Speaker 1: noir and horror. I feel now through all of this
Speaker 1: research are frankest in their origins and meant to demoralize
Speaker 1: through that aspect of society.
Speaker 2: And you know, it's funny is that, you know, the
Speaker 2: corruption of the justice system makes what they're talking about
Speaker 2: valid because they've also you know, corrupted that themselves, so
Speaker 2: that you know, the cop can be the bad guy,
Speaker 2: you know, and they get away with it for a
Speaker 2: long time, and so can the justice system be you know, unjust,
Speaker 2: and so therefore the criminal could be just a regular
Speaker 2: guy trying to work his way through it. So it's
Speaker 2: not that it's like it was a self fulfilling, you
Speaker 2: know statement, because then they did infiltrate those other aspects
Speaker 2: and corrupt them as well. So then people look at
Speaker 2: that and say, well, there is a you know, they
Speaker 2: subconsciously they say, there's a truth to this. You know,
Speaker 2: the good guy isn't always the good guy. The bad
Speaker 2: guy isn't always the bad guy, you know, right.
Speaker 1: And so you see we mentioned earlier Walter Littmann Infiltrating Media.
Speaker 1: He's really considered the father of modern journalism. Today, okay,
Speaker 1: And then so then brand Eyes is infiltrating law and
Speaker 1: he uses these founders of sociology to do it and
Speaker 1: Harvard Law School to promote it. Then we see Hollywood
Speaker 1: being infiltrated with the same message. So all this, Huxley
Speaker 1: said to Julian Huxley that if we were going to
Speaker 1: do this, we had to infiltrate all aspects of society
Speaker 1: at the same time, not just one and then the
Speaker 1: other and the other, because they wouldn't get that consensus
Speaker 1: that you're talking about right where people believe this pseudo
Speaker 1: environment is real. And that's what Walter Lippman said, is
Speaker 1: that we got to create a pseudo environment as close
Speaker 1: to reality as we can so that we can manipulate reality.
Speaker 1: This is the father of modern journalism, and this is
Speaker 1: where punditry comes from. This is where opinionated news comes from.
Speaker 1: Something that's normalized probably to millennials today, but it should
Speaker 1: have never happened too. Just like allowing a Francis Sabotan
Speaker 1: to be a US Supreme Court justice, these are highly
Speaker 1: contentious moments in history. It took Brandeie six months from
Speaker 1: his election to confirmation because there was so much outrage.
Speaker 1: Now they blame anti semitism, but it's really because they
Speaker 1: knew that he was a Zionist leader nineteen fourteen. He's
Speaker 1: got loyalties to another country.
Speaker 2: My TV just shut itself off.
Speaker 1: That's kind of weird.
Speaker 2: At least we still stayed on. TV itself shut itself up.
Speaker 1: Well, we experience all kinds of strange things. I have
Speaker 1: to when I go on to Facebook. I got a
Speaker 1: log on two or three times real quick, and then
Speaker 1: I can get on. If I just try once, it'll
Speaker 1: sort of go halfway there and just freeze and stay.
Speaker 1: It's interesting. There's all kinds of stuff on Facebook that
Speaker 1: if and I do record, I screenshot and I'll record
Speaker 1: my activity because I show that. I'll put comments into
Speaker 1: a YouTube like this Candice Owns or this Jimmy Door,
Speaker 1: and then I'll go out, refresh, come back in and
Speaker 1: it's gone.
Speaker 2: Ye.
Speaker 1: Large shadow banning going on all over the place. It's
Speaker 1: so subtle that most people won't even notice.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I know.
Speaker 3: This.
Speaker 1: The American Progressives. Every time I mentioned brand Eyes or
Speaker 1: Litman or progressivism, I get shut down.
Speaker 2: I tried to talk to h and there's blacklist words
Speaker 2: for sure.
Speaker 1: Yeah, absolutely Yeah, if you can tell that once you
Speaker 1: start saying those words, right, yep Owen Benjamin. He's a
Speaker 1: popular alternative media guy and claims to know stuff, but
Speaker 1: he's totally eliminated me from communicating with him online. Everywhere
Speaker 1: I try to talk to him, it says, now you've
Speaker 1: been by the content creator themselves. You've been stopped or blocked.
Speaker 1: So this is really when we talk about controlled opposition.
Speaker 1: This is what they're hiding the American progressivism. This is
Speaker 1: why both parties it doesn't matter who you vote for,
Speaker 1: because progressivism goes up the middle and has influenced both.
Speaker 1: Whether you want to talk about Operation Warp Speed or
Speaker 1: build that, Build back better, they're both progressive platforms moving forward,
Speaker 1: just like Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson had both competing
Speaker 1: progressive platforms in nineteen twelve and the Republican vote split
Speaker 1: and allowed Woodrow Wilson to take the presidency.
Speaker 2: How are you talking about the party and all that
Speaker 2: with the Roosevelt getting involved.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the Bull Moose Party was was the first progressive party,
Speaker 1: and that's why the New Republic and the House of
Speaker 1: Truth were created in the first place. But because Theodore
Speaker 1: Roosevelt had some hesitations about their overall plan, they decided
Speaker 1: to shift last minute to Woodrow Wilson. So this is
Speaker 1: why we see total shifts in in Wilson's behavior and
Speaker 1: historians asking why that happens still to this day. And
Speaker 1: so the final thing I want to say, I think
Speaker 1: I said this on the last show, but I came
Speaker 1: up with this image in my head and it helps
Speaker 1: explain it. It's the story of Troy. And I'm not
Speaker 1: blaming Greeks here at all. I'm just saying that, you
Speaker 1: know the battle, the story of the Battle of Troy,
Speaker 1: how they had the trojan horse outside and all of
Speaker 1: the soldiers hidden in there. Once and then they sailed off,
Speaker 1: and once they brought the trojan horse into the city
Speaker 1: of Troy, all these soldiers snuck out in the middle
Speaker 1: of night and slaughtered all of these guys. So I
Speaker 1: say that exchange the trojan horse with a bull moose
Speaker 1: and instead of warriors inside, put the scientific technical experts.
Speaker 1: Because this is how no matter how far you want
Speaker 1: to go back all the way to the Illuminati, the
Speaker 1: enlightened absolutisty, even all the way back to the enlightened movement, itself.
Speaker 1: We're seeing this push towards the scientific expert as a governing,
Speaker 1: controlling source for our society today.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and you know that analogy that you just made
Speaker 2: is also very interesting because you think of the way
Speaker 2: they talk about how you know, if if I don't
Speaker 2: believe in the virus model, but the same idea that
Speaker 2: it masks itself, maybe we could talk about it like
Speaker 2: how they do it with the with the shots where
Speaker 2: your body recognizes it as something else, allows it into
Speaker 2: the cell, and then it opens up and becomes lethal
Speaker 2: to your whole entire system. And that's quite like the
Speaker 2: trojan horse, right, and the trojan virus is on a computer.
Speaker 1: Same deal.
Speaker 2: It recognizes that one thing, but it's not that that's
Speaker 2: not the thing.
Speaker 1: Vampires do the same thing. Would you let them in
Speaker 1: the door? You're in trouble now? You know they approach
Speaker 1: you as a different person.
Speaker 2: Hey man, maybe maybe on Wendays Wednesdays we can discuss
Speaker 2: FDR and the complete destruct and like that, the deliberate
Speaker 2: what do you call it intensification and prolonged stay in
Speaker 2: the depression for duras on purpose. Right, and then you
Speaker 2: know the starvation of about three million Americans while we're
Speaker 2: sending all this aid to Bolshevik murderers. You know, we
Speaker 2: can get into all that if you want. Or the
Speaker 2: price fixing, the killing of cattle while people are starving.
Speaker 2: That that was the communist and you know, collectivization is
Speaker 2: what the hell else you gonna call it?
Speaker 4: Right?
Speaker 1: Yeah, And so Brandeis was nicknamed by FDR is Isaiah
Speaker 1: Oh the stage advisor at all. He's in the earliest
Speaker 1: moments of FDR's brain trust. And what happened was the
Speaker 1: truth is that nineteen twenty Woodrow Wilson's not elected again
Speaker 1: and they have a string of democratic presidents, so they
Speaker 1: can't they're not influencing or was it Republican one way
Speaker 1: or the other. They couldn't gain influence with the next
Speaker 1: presidents until FDR came. Now why FDR was Secretary of
Speaker 1: War in nineteen seventeen, or he's a one step down,
Speaker 1: but he's like right there with Churchill. They're just lowered
Speaker 1: down the wrung at this point in nineteen seventeen, and
Speaker 1: they rise in the thirties to be the key leaders.
Speaker 1: And so they're all buddies from twenty years prior. So
Speaker 1: Brandeis and Frankfurter become sort of the leaders of this
Speaker 1: brain trust with all of the students that they had
Speaker 1: just taught through Harvard Law School, and FDR called brand
Speaker 1: is Isaiah. And so they started stuff with Woodrow Wilson
Speaker 1: that they didn't quite complete, the administrative state the whole
Speaker 1: government being a scientific expert, so they had to get
Speaker 1: FDR in there, their buddy. And once he was in there,
Speaker 1: that's probably why four terms you can see a total
Speaker 1: continuity between Woodrow Wilson where he ends and then where
Speaker 1: they start again with FDR.
Speaker 2: I just pointed out my book because you said Isaiah
Speaker 2: being the stage advisor advisors to the king is one
Speaker 2: of the things I talk about with these these this priestcraft,
Speaker 2: the whisperers in the years. Right. But but yeah, then
Speaker 2: we to the unfortunate uh you know Americans we had
Speaker 2: right after right after FDR, we have you know, Truman, Eisenhower.
Speaker 2: All these people are on board with the communistic plan.
Speaker 2: So I mean it, so on your website is are
Speaker 2: there is there like a donation buttoners or someplace where
Speaker 2: people can support what you do?
Speaker 1: Yep, you go down to the bottom. It says support
Speaker 1: Team BP.
Speaker 2: People can see it so they know where we're how
Speaker 2: to navigate. It is the type of this is the
Speaker 2: type of stuff if anybody is looking to uh, you
Speaker 2: know this, this is this is this is a noble
Speaker 2: cause here for sure, as you can see.
Speaker 1: My landing page. Okay, so level down here. I haven't
Speaker 1: actually checked this in a while, so I don't know
Speaker 1: it might not be here. Yeah, So scan QR code
Speaker 1: to support TMVP. Cool. And it gives you options as
Speaker 1: to how much you want to donate and how often
Speaker 1: and all those kinds of things. But we would appreciate
Speaker 1: any of that kind of stuff because it helps fund
Speaker 1: us to continue to work and to continue to go
Speaker 1: down these avenues of research that are very important to
Speaker 1: you know, the chance of our victory.
Speaker 2: How many people contribute outside of yourself. It's hards, I
Speaker 2: mean the work.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, well my wife helps. She'll do voiceovers for
Speaker 1: some of our work employee that we had at the farm. Carry.
Speaker 1: She's done a lot of help here in you know,
Speaker 1: cataloging all of my screenshots and making sure the things
Speaker 1: that we're saving get saved properly.
Speaker 2: But you're the I'm reader and researcher of this, all right.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And I can't go without mentioning Yon Soley. He's
Speaker 1: my buddy and we created this website together. He did
Speaker 1: a lot of the initial hard work and got her
Speaker 1: up and running, and you know, he's branched off into
Speaker 1: other avenues too of research that are very important, and
Speaker 1: we are planning on coming together to discuss, you know,
Speaker 1: your sovereignty in ways that you can maybe deprogram yourself
Speaker 1: or step out of the matrix. So we're working on
Speaker 1: doing something like that right now. Of course, it's just
Speaker 1: super busy this time of year for me, so you no,
Speaker 1: I'm able to be with you here on Wednesdays because
Speaker 1: we have to close the farm on Wednesday mornings because
Speaker 1: my wife has gone to do deliveries and I think
Speaker 1: you know that they're not allowing me on the land
Speaker 1: that I lease there.
Speaker 2: So they'll take it the money, but they won't let
Speaker 2: you on, right, And so.
Speaker 1: What that has done has allowed me to have this
Speaker 1: this moment on Wednesday mornings with you, which is super helpful,
Speaker 1: and a whole other viewership and a whole other group
Speaker 1: of people that may not be familiar with this.
Speaker 2: So you know, that's a great thing. Take to take
Speaker 2: a to take a hit and turn it into an opportunity.
Speaker 2: That's that's oh, and wait until I show you what
Speaker 2: we have done, my friend. We had Jesse Hal from
Speaker 2: the Missing Link drop in on us yesterday. They were
Speaker 2: traveling through and so I got to show him where
Speaker 2: we are right now and what is sort of the
Speaker 2: fruits of all of this early.
Speaker 1: Season labor that I did because I was kicked off
Speaker 1: and so we had to try to find some new
Speaker 1: land to grow as much as we could off that land,
Speaker 1: and so I procured two acres and we got at
Speaker 1: least an acre of it disked and were growing in
Speaker 1: it right now. We're pulling potatoes like crazy out of
Speaker 1: there right now. And so in that search for a
Speaker 1: plow because I don't have a tractor, I came across
Speaker 1: this whole other group of people that are establishing another
Speaker 1: farm in our area, and they were short growers. And
Speaker 1: so the entity of where you are, where are you
Speaker 1: look at within a couple of kilometers. So we're looking at,
Speaker 1: you know, great advantages there. I don't want to say
Speaker 1: too much yet, but it is it is formally agreed
Speaker 1: upon that this is where we're going next year, and
Speaker 1: so I honestly can't wait to show everybody what really
Speaker 1: what I did in the face of all of that
Speaker 1: anger and hatred, and this really centers on the creation
Speaker 1: of Israel. This is what happened to me, is that
Speaker 1: she came, you know, after listening to the news, and
Speaker 1: I was just there bagging vegetables and doing my job
Speaker 1: at the post harvest, and she started talking to me
Speaker 1: about how we need to support Israel, and I said, well,
Speaker 1: Israel was created in nineteen seventeen, not nineteen forty eight.
Speaker 1: And she didn't know who she was talking to, and
Speaker 1: so she got into a conversation she couldn't handle and
Speaker 1: called me confused and said, oh, all kinds of things
Speaker 1: to me, and it's it's really been just a nightmare
Speaker 1: to me and now my wife and you know, lesser
Speaker 1: person might have done more than me. But we're just
Speaker 1: trying to reason. We understand that there's only a couple
Speaker 1: months left in the season and then we're going to
Speaker 1: this great place nice where we've got a ton of
Speaker 1: like minded people. There ain't going to be any conflict
Speaker 1: as to our political ideologies. We're all of the same
Speaker 1: mind and we're starting to create a really amazing thing.
Speaker 1: There are you in the states.
Speaker 2: Are you are you in No, I'm in Colowna.
Speaker 1: British Columbia, Canada. So the Okanagan Valley. I grew up here,
Speaker 1: and I decided, you know, while some people are leaving
Speaker 1: the country or the province to do to sort of
Speaker 1: withstand whatever's going to happen in our future, I decided
Speaker 1: to plant everything right where I grew up nice and
Speaker 1: fight this from where I have lived my entire life.
Speaker 1: And so we're starting now to branch out in our community,
Speaker 1: out of the Glenmore Valley here and really make some
Speaker 1: great connections with honeymaker's, bee keepers, breadmakers, artisans of all types,
Speaker 1: and you know, hillshuf Acre is starting to be a
Speaker 1: little bit central to that. So those are really my
Speaker 1: most favorite connections, feeding people and watching the face their
Speaker 1: face when they eat a carrot for the first time.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 2: Vinlanderson says, I'm enjoying these Wednesday in the Ballproof.
Speaker 1: Right, this is a great example of the interdisciplinary sort
Speaker 1: of get togethers that we need to have. This is
Speaker 1: the cybernetics. We're going to get into that possibly in
Speaker 1: the future. Daniel both the cybernetics revolution, well, that was
Speaker 1: the key aspect for them. They had to get all
Speaker 1: of these different doctors and experts together, each of them
Speaker 1: presenting their expertise, and then from that information, all of
Speaker 1: the others started to make connections and gather and now
Speaker 1: they have near total social control of us because of that.
Speaker 1: So much like we need to regain the education that
Speaker 1: they removed, we must also connect in an interdisciplinary area
Speaker 1: like you and I are. You're you're more centered in
Speaker 1: the older history right up to where I start, and
Speaker 1: I'm in modernity, and we are looking to make that
Speaker 1: connection and then stretch it back even further and see
Speaker 1: how far this back goes back and present it in
Speaker 1: a beautiful, attractive, persuasive story that helps people learn things quickly,
Speaker 1: because this is one of the things that people say,
Speaker 1: it's a lot of information to take in when you're
Speaker 1: just sort of acclimatizing yourself to it. So this is
Speaker 1: what was important to me, was just make it simple.
Speaker 1: And that's why I break it all into a bunch
Speaker 1: of different parts so that you can consume a little
Speaker 1: bit and consume a little bit, and then you know,
Speaker 1: we do podcasts like this where we break it wide
Speaker 1: open and so you can just sit and listen with
Speaker 1: your eyes closed if you want, and so we're just
Speaker 1: trying to build to suit, you know.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's it's really like super tough to look at
Speaker 2: present day craziness and make sense of it. So then
Speaker 2: you have to ask yourself, Okay, where did these ideas
Speaker 2: come from? And that's where the history part is is important,
Speaker 2: and you know, even one hundred years back, it's like, okay,
Speaker 2: well there's also deeper roots here, you know, you know,
Speaker 2: and then you're like, because where did this all come from?
Speaker 2: And why did it just all appear all of a sudden.
Speaker 2: It wasn't all of a sudden.
Speaker 1: It was a it was an.
Speaker 2: Evolution of people pressing getting you know, the aristocracy involved
Speaker 2: uh you know, endearing them to them or or basically
Speaker 2: enslaving them to the to this agenda. And then you
Speaker 2: start to see okay, yeah, then you go back to
Speaker 2: the present and you're like, this is dark. This is
Speaker 2: something that's not friendly to mankind whatsoever, because I know
Speaker 2: where it comes from, you know, and that's that's.
Speaker 1: Where the connection has made.
Speaker 2: You know. It's so we both we both have our
Speaker 2: because it's too much for one person to do, I
Speaker 2: mean you so it's it's great that we have. You know,
Speaker 2: I'm glad that you come on. I'm glad to see you,
Speaker 2: and I can't wait to see you next Wednesday, sir.
Speaker 1: Yeah, So we'll go as long as I can here
Speaker 1: and we'll just break it all out and as we
Speaker 1: go through in real time, we're going to gather more
Speaker 1: and more information and we'll just keep presenting it to
Speaker 1: everybody and hopefully together we have a concerted awakening into
Speaker 1: the real history. Because if if you don't know your
Speaker 1: real real history, you're condemned to repeat it. And so
Speaker 1: I concur that's why I chose this scope of work. Was,
Speaker 1: you know, to understand history is to show that they've
Speaker 1: done it before, so then you become a pattern recognizer.
Speaker 1: And when it starts, when they start to say the
Speaker 1: same kind of things and use the same kind of language,
Speaker 1: you can just put a stop to it. No, no, no, no, yeah,
Speaker 1: exactly exactly.
Speaker 2: All right, Dwayne, have an amazing day, my friend.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much. Yep, thanks for everybody watching. To
Speaker 1: catch later.