Speaker 1: Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the
Speaker 1: David Knight Show. As a clock strikes thirteen, it's Thursday,
Speaker 1: the twenty second of August. You have of our Lord
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four. Well, today we're going to begin with
Speaker 1: the Trump and RFK Junior because I think it's it's
Speaker 1: not so much interesting as far as the selection goes,
Speaker 1: because it is a selection. Everybody is so vicariously focused
Speaker 1: on what's going to happen in one office, the most
Speaker 1: distant office, the one that more money is poured into
Speaker 1: than anything else. But I think it shows us the
Speaker 1: political map that we have now you can choose between
Speaker 1: Marxist and Democrats. We're also going to go back and
Speaker 1: take a look at more information about nanotech in the vaccines.
Speaker 1: And it's very interesting to go back to a paper
Speaker 1: that is almost a decade old where the I Tripoli
Speaker 1: was talking about that very thing. So we'll be right
Speaker 1: back stay with us. As I said, we have now
Speaker 1: a landscape that is looking more and more like which
Speaker 1: Democrat do you want to vote for? Or do you
Speaker 1: want to vote for a Marxist? R F K Junior
Speaker 1: can save liberalism by endorsing Trump. Says qtr's fringe finance
Speaker 1: r f K Junior said on Twitter, he said, the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party positions itself as a party of liberty. It's
Speaker 1: a joke. La La Harris says that Americans should make
Speaker 1: personal decisions without the government telling them what to do.
Speaker 1: What was she in the last four years? Tim Wallas's
Speaker 1: golden rule is mind your own damn business. He says,
Speaker 1: what if they were to do that in view of
Speaker 1: the censorship, the surveillance, the vaccine mandates, the confederacy of
Speaker 1: fixers openly working to prevent me from getting on the ballots.
Speaker 1: This is like the art and it's telling us that
Speaker 1: he's a firefighter. I'm running to make America once again
Speaker 1: the land of liberty. It's at RFK Junior. And then
Speaker 1: on Tuesday we had the headlines hit that he could
Speaker 1: wind up dropping out of the race. So he will.
Speaker 1: He will, as now being widely reported, and as NBC
Speaker 1: pointed out, he will be in Phoenix tomorrow as Trump
Speaker 1: is holding a rally in Phoenix tomorrow. He's going to
Speaker 1: make his announcement, his big announcement, whatever that is, in
Speaker 1: the morning. Trump is going to have an event in
Speaker 1: the evening and I imagine that event will include him.
Speaker 1: But of course, when we look at Nicole Shanahan talking
Speaker 1: about how the DNC sabotaged their campaign, as I pointed
Speaker 1: out yesterday, he said, there's two options. One is to
Speaker 1: stay in and form a new party. But then we
Speaker 1: run the risks, she said of having Kami La La
Speaker 1: and the Waltz presidency because we draw more votes Trump,
Speaker 1: or we walk away. Right now, we joined forces with Trump,
Speaker 1: and we explained to our base why we're making this decision.
Speaker 1: That was what she was doing. She was doing option
Speaker 1: number two. Of course, she was explaining to her base
Speaker 1: why she's making the decision, explained to the base why
Speaker 1: they're going to be walking away, preparing that essentially, so
Speaker 1: the person who's writing this qt our fringe says, when
Speaker 1: I saw the headlines last week from the Washington Post
Speaker 1: that Kennedy was trying to meet with Harris to discuss
Speaker 1: a cabinet job, he said he didn't believe it. He
Speaker 1: has sources who were reporting that Kennedy wanted Harris's help.
Speaker 1: Was a load of crap, he said. Instead, they informed
Speaker 1: me that a family member of RFK Junior had tried
Speaker 1: to convince him at a wedding to talk to Harris
Speaker 1: on the phone. The source said, we were at a
Speaker 1: wedding and one of URFK Junior's cousins was like, let
Speaker 1: me please put you on the phone with La Ladge
Speaker 1: just to talk. And then they didn't want to have
Speaker 1: a phone call, and so he said, it's rf K
Speaker 1: Junior's deal, he said, or the source said, is to
Speaker 1: talk to anyone anytime. So it's not out of character.
Speaker 1: Is that what he does is he talked to anyone
Speaker 1: at any time. Doesn't talk to me. You know. It's
Speaker 1: interesting because you remember I had said when he came
Speaker 1: out with a Fauncy book, I had told everybody he's
Speaker 1: going to be on tomorrow and everything. I announced it
Speaker 1: that morning, the very last minute they canceled. I had
Speaker 1: had the interview set up because I had previously interviewed
Speaker 1: the head of the California Children's Health Defense and I
Speaker 1: forget what her first name was now because it's been
Speaker 1: a couple of years ago, but she was with the
Speaker 1: Oscar Meyer she was an heiress of the Oscar Meyer fortune,
Speaker 1: and she was working with Children's Health Defense out in California,
Speaker 1: and we talked about I guess it was probably maybe
Speaker 1: it's twenty twenty one or something, because we talked about
Speaker 1: what was breaking then was the difference why they were
Speaker 1: authorizing Coremanati and how it was legally distinct, and the
Speaker 1: games that they were playing so they could get legal
Speaker 1: immunity and still say well, we can now force you
Speaker 1: to take this because it's been approved quote unquote approved.
Speaker 1: They couldn't force people to take it when it was
Speaker 1: emergency use authorization, but they didn't want to technically have
Speaker 1: the thing that was here beforemally approved because then that
Speaker 1: would completely They played these semantic games, these legal games,
Speaker 1: making it legally distinct so they wouldn't lose the emergency
Speaker 1: use authorization liability protection. Anyway, we talked about that. It
Speaker 1: was good. We had a good rapport, and I said,
Speaker 1: can you get me an interview with him when the
Speaker 1: book came out? She said sure, and so we had
Speaker 1: the interview was scheduled for a while, and then the
Speaker 1: morning of it was canceled and they did not want
Speaker 1: to reschedule. It was like, Okay, I get it. I've
Speaker 1: had that done to me many times. You know, people
Speaker 1: who Andrew Yang who was running to talk about universal
Speaker 1: basic income and he canceled on me at the last
Speaker 1: minute because he didn't want to talk to me about
Speaker 1: universal basic income. So it's a pretty common thing to
Speaker 1: have happened with me, So I didn't really think much
Speaker 1: about it. But you know, whenever I see this that
Speaker 1: he's going to talk to anyone at any time, that's
Speaker 1: a lie as well. He needs to come clean still
Speaker 1: about what he said about locking up his opponents, like
Speaker 1: you ought to come out and say. I used to
Speaker 1: believe that we ought to, you know, purge people if
Speaker 1: we disagreed with them to some degree. I was very
Speaker 1: passionate about this, but now that has happened to me,
Speaker 1: I've changed my mind. He just doing me a kulpa.
Speaker 1: Be honest with people instead, rather than admit that he
Speaker 1: lied about what he was saying at the time, he said,
Speaker 1: why I was saying that we needed to put the
Speaker 1: corporations in jail? No, no, he did not say that.
Speaker 1: He was talking about the Koch brothers. So you know,
Speaker 1: that's fine to change your mind, just be honest about it.
Speaker 1: But the reality is is that he's still a Green radical,
Speaker 1: he's still a Democrat, He's still funny when it comes
Speaker 1: to being anti wars Gerald Celenti found out. I didn't
Speaker 1: trust him, but he was saying all the stuff that
Speaker 1: Celenti had said. And look, you know, if somebody's not
Speaker 1: run for office before and they're saying all the right things,
Speaker 1: I understand supporting them. But he's not anti war, not
Speaker 1: about Israel, not really about Ukraine. His son was over
Speaker 1: fighting in Ukraine. So I really don't see those positions
Speaker 1: as being honest. When it comes to vaccines, he's not
Speaker 1: anti vaccine either. He's a limited hangout when it comes
Speaker 1: to that. He is not taking a principal stand. He's
Speaker 1: leaving a lot of room for a compromise and wiggle,
Speaker 1: leaving the door open for all of those things. As
Speaker 1: I've said many times before, the GOP has become the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party of my youth, and the Democrat Party has
Speaker 1: become the Marxist Party as a QDR rights many former
Speaker 1: Democrats and Liberals have switched over to the Conservative Party
Speaker 1: in the last decade, including Trump right or so. As
Speaker 1: the calibration of the parties has shifted significantly, left wing
Speaker 1: causes have become extraordinarily far left, and so you have
Speaker 1: the Democrats versus the Marxist I mean, which Democrat, Would
Speaker 1: you like to vote for would you like to vote
Speaker 1: for Trump? Or for RFK junior Democrats? All this guy says, well,
Speaker 1: even former Democrat President Bill Clinton even went out of
Speaker 1: his way to balance the budget. Look, he got the
Speaker 1: credit for balancing the budget. Gingrich got all the blame.
Speaker 1: And I'm not a fan of Newt Gingrich either. I've
Speaker 1: got a lot of differences with New Gingrich of a
Speaker 1: lot of different issues. Matter of fact, you know, he
Speaker 1: was a smart strategist though, and he would say, well,
Speaker 1: if you got eighty percent of the people who want
Speaker 1: this and only twenty percent of the people who want that,
Speaker 1: I think you want to be with this rather than that.
Speaker 1: And so if you look at his contract with America
Speaker 1: that got the big majority in the House. I ran
Speaker 1: the following time against Virginia Fox, who had come in
Speaker 1: with that group that came in with a contract with
Speaker 1: America in nineteen ninety four. She's still there thirty years later,
Speaker 1: and she didn't want a debate. She you know, I
Speaker 1: was on a TV debate with a Democrat, who I
Speaker 1: think that's such a heavily Republican district that a Democrat
Speaker 1: only got like twenty percent, even know it was. It
Speaker 1: was crazy. So they were trying to do everything. PBS
Speaker 1: was trying to do everything they could to help the
Speaker 1: Democrat and that included getting third party candidates on. But
Speaker 1: you know, when you look at what Gingridge was doing,
Speaker 1: one of the things he wanted to do was to
Speaker 1: balance the budget good and he did it, and he
Speaker 1: did it with cuts, and he was ripped up one
Speaker 1: side down the other by the Democrats. The mainstream media
Speaker 1: at the time. I think it was Time magazine when
Speaker 1: people still paid attention to it. They had a cover
Speaker 1: of the Gingrich who Stole Christmas. That was pretty funny.
Speaker 1: That stuck with me. But they blamed him for all
Speaker 1: of the cuts, and then they when it got balanced,
Speaker 1: they gave all the credit to Bill Clinton. So he says, hey,
Speaker 1: you know, Bill Clinton even balanced the budget. Not exactly
Speaker 1: an idea. That's unconscionable for Democrats given to day spending
Speaker 1: addiction and policy stances on the fiscal state of the country.
Speaker 1: By the way, one of the other things in there
Speaker 1: was to have a line item veto for the president,
Speaker 1: and of course Bill Clinton liked that. Being president, they
Speaker 1: want to have more power to strike out things that
Speaker 1: are there and guess how that got struck down. That
Speaker 1: got struck down in the courts when Rudy Giuliani, the
Speaker 1: mayor of New York, pushed back against that. Yeah, Donald
Speaker 1: Trump's friend, Yeah, Rudy. Nine to eleven. Rudy, you know,
Speaker 1: shortly after that he was exposing people to dust that
Speaker 1: would kill them, many of them, so I could do
Speaker 1: a quick cover up of what was left behind in
Speaker 1: terms of evidence at nine to eleven. That Rudy Giuliani,
Speaker 1: the same one who said, we don't want to have
Speaker 1: a balanced budget, We don't want to have a line
Speaker 1: one of Vito. That's where Trump's coming from. So he said, well,
Speaker 1: we simply don't have a democratic process unfolding when it
Speaker 1: comes to selecting our next president. Of course we don't.
Speaker 1: It's always been an illusion. It's always been a distraction
Speaker 1: from the things that could really make a difference in
Speaker 1: your life. That's what I want people to understand. You
Speaker 1: can vote for whoever you want to. I'm not telling
Speaker 1: you who to vote for. I'm telling you the problems
Speaker 1: that I have with all these people, and if I
Speaker 1: agree with them, I'll tell you as well. You know,
Speaker 1: like I said, I've got a lot of problems with
Speaker 1: Nut Gingrich for things he did. But when I agree
Speaker 1: with him on some of these issues, I'll be happy
Speaker 1: to give him credit for those. But it really is
Speaker 1: an illusion, a distraction from what could be where you
Speaker 1: could make a difference locally when you focus on these
Speaker 1: presidential races. And as a good example of what has
Speaker 1: happened to the Democrat Party, I talked earlier this week
Speaker 1: when Phil Donahue died. I said, you know, here's an
Speaker 1: old school liberal. They would support free speech, they would
Speaker 1: be anti war and things like that, not like these
Speaker 1: tyrants today. And these people in the Democrat Party today
Speaker 1: are full on Marxist. And I'm not using hyperbole here.
Speaker 1: That's exactly what they are. Don't call him. She Van Fleet,
Speaker 1: who wrote Mao's America, A Survivor's Warning, said he said,
Speaker 1: people have got to stop calling this stuff woke. She said,
Speaker 1: this is exactly why they're doing this, anti racism, all
Speaker 1: the rest of the stuff. She said, these are the
Speaker 1: struggle sessions that they required us to have and communist China.
Speaker 1: There wasn't any race issue involved there, but you had
Speaker 1: to denounce your privilege, you had to denounce yourself and
Speaker 1: all the rest of the stuff, you humiliate yourself to
Speaker 1: the communist and the so called common good, But the
Speaker 1: liberals used to be a lot different. As a matter
Speaker 1: of fact, the guy that I met back in twenty
Speaker 1: sixteen while I was covering the DNC convention, he was
Speaker 1: also covering it for immedia organization, and he was a listener,
Speaker 1: and so we kind of hung out together we're taking
Speaker 1: breaks at the convention, and we've stayed in contact now
Speaker 1: since that time. And after I talked about Phil Donahue,
Speaker 1: he sent me a short clip of promoting a film
Speaker 1: that he was doing that Phil Donahue was executive producer,
Speaker 1: And I want you to see this because it was
Speaker 1: really a good example of the anti war aspect of
Speaker 1: what used to be the position of the left.
Speaker 2: As Thomas explains, the film's objective is to raise awareness
Speaker 2: on the conditions he and many others bear as to
Speaker 2: the personal cost of war.
Speaker 3: The more we show, the more people will know about
Speaker 3: what's going on and what can happen to somebody after
Speaker 3: they come back, because the evening news doesn't really take
Speaker 3: the time to try to show the human cost of war.
Speaker 2: TV talk show legend Phil Donahue, executive producer of Body
Speaker 2: of War, elaborates on how he met Thomas Well.
Speaker 4: I met Thomas Young at Walter Reed and I just
Speaker 4: stared down at this bed. He was very whacked out morphine,
Speaker 4: heavily medicated, and his mother, as I stood there, told
Speaker 4: me about his injury. He's a T four, so the
Speaker 4: bullet came severed his spine between the shoulder blade. So
Speaker 4: Thomas is paralyzed from the nipples down. He's got his arms,
Speaker 4: he can't walk, he can't cough, he has bowl and bladder.
Speaker 4: Twenty eight years old today, primal life. He has a
Speaker 4: rectile dysfunction. He throws up every morning. His pills have
Speaker 4: pills to correct the side effects of the other pills.
Speaker 2: The director of the film is the award winning Ellen.
Speaker 5: Spira, So nothing's what they'll get.
Speaker 2: I She explained how she developed her connection with Thomas
Speaker 2: over the course of the.
Speaker 5: Film, told stupid jokes and just talked and became friends.
Speaker 5: You know, I'm not into I don't believe in this
Speaker 5: idea of journalistic objectivity where you're separate from your subject.
Speaker 5: If you're a human being and you develop a human connection,
Speaker 5: then you feel for that person. And it's not like
Speaker 5: there's another side to that story. You know, Thomas's story
Speaker 5: is Thomas's story. There is no other side.
Speaker 6: The army's chief goal is to get you in, but
Speaker 6: once it comes time for you to get out, they
Speaker 6: don't really care if they take care of you or not.
Speaker 4: People do not see what we show in our film.
Speaker 4: There's no emotional connection here. I'm not saying Americans don't care.
Speaker 7: They do.
Speaker 8: Americans don't want anybody to die. But you know it's abstract.
Speaker 4: Oh dear four thousand, see one of them, Just see
Speaker 4: of them. Just go visit one family and then tell
Speaker 4: me how you feel about this war.
Speaker 9: I'll speak for a man who gave for this land,
Speaker 9: took a poet.
Speaker 1: And the back.
Speaker 9: He still is good, does what He's come back to city,
Speaker 9: what suns.
Speaker 5: He's coming up from the ashes, and he's becoming a voice,
Speaker 5: an anti war voice in the culture, and he's finding
Speaker 5: out who he is as a new person.
Speaker 6: I heard somebody once say that the only thing necessary
Speaker 6: for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
Speaker 6: So just everybody, uh, keep together and stay strong and
Speaker 6: one day we'll get what we need to get done.
Speaker 2: As the troops return with the end of the Iraq War.
Speaker 2: Thomas and all who share his opinion continue to question
Speaker 2: this legitimacy and fight for the veterans. Cavortashian Veally News Washington.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's Cavort Tashian. And you know, as you heard
Speaker 1: him interviewing them. First of all, a couple observations. Phil Dona,
Speaker 1: who was at Walter Reed Hospital, what was he doing there? Well,
Speaker 1: he's visiting the people that had been injured. Unlike the
Speaker 1: politicians who loved to send them there, do they go
Speaker 1: hang out and and see the what happens after these wars,
Speaker 1: to see if they think that it's even worth it?
Speaker 1: They don't care? And you know he did that just
Speaker 1: like Silenti, as I pointed out the other day. Yeah,
Speaker 1: SILENTI was on all the big shows, big network shows,
Speaker 1: anything talking about economics because he had been very successful
Speaker 1: predicting trends. And when he opposed the war is that
Speaker 1: they're not going to have him on anymore. And Phil
Speaker 1: Donahue opposed the war, lost his his position there because
Speaker 1: he opposed the war memo was released. I talked about
Speaker 1: that the other day. And so what does he do, Well,
Speaker 1: he goes to visit people who are injured at Walter Reed,
Speaker 1: and he's concerned about it. So he does this film
Speaker 1: Body of War. Also, the director who was talking about
Speaker 1: it said, well, this idea we got to separate ourselves
Speaker 1: from the subject, that we've got to be objective and
Speaker 1: all the US's stuff. Well, I don't believe an objective media.
Speaker 1: I think people who say that are fooling themselves. And
Speaker 1: if they're not fooling themselves, they're fooling you. So let's
Speaker 1: forget about this stuff that's objective. I said this over
Speaker 1: and over again. Just take a look. A good example
Speaker 1: is Matt Drudge. He doesn't write anything. What he does
Speaker 1: is he chooses which stories he wants to put out there.
Speaker 1: He's like an editor, right, And you can have an
Speaker 1: incredible bias just as an editor without writing anything. What
Speaker 1: you choose to report on reflects your bias, and everybody's
Speaker 1: got a bias. You should be aware of that. As
Speaker 1: I've said many times, when I was in college, I
Speaker 1: used to like to read across a political spectrum. I
Speaker 1: really didn't like the lukewarm mainstream publications like Newsweek and
Speaker 1: Time that pretended that they were objective. They were not objective,
Speaker 1: or you know, operation Mockingbird, I was later to learn.
Speaker 1: But I liked the people who were, you know, on
Speaker 1: extreme conservative or extreme liberal or radical or whatever, who
Speaker 1: would look at the events and tell you what they
Speaker 1: thought and why they thought it. And that's what I've
Speaker 1: always tried to do. There is no such thing as
Speaker 1: objective news. Tell people what you think and why you
Speaker 1: think it, but the idea that you're objective about that.
Speaker 1: So again that's an example of the way the left was,
Speaker 1: and you could disagree with them on economics and other
Speaker 1: things like that, but then you could find some areas
Speaker 1: of agreement. That's not the left today. The left today
Speaker 1: are totalitarian, censoring Marxists. The current Democrat Party says QDR
Speaker 1: is everything that former classic liberals, classic classic liberals used
Speaker 1: to fight against. And again I think that he's thinking
Speaker 1: not of the classic liberals of the eighteen hundreds. You know,
Speaker 1: they stole the name liberal during the Woodrow Wilson administration
Speaker 1: when the liberty movement essentially fractured over World War One.
Speaker 1: You had the anti war people who were out there,
Speaker 1: and you had the people who were for World War
Speaker 1: One but were also for economic freedom, and so you
Speaker 1: had this divide that for the longest time was roughly
Speaker 1: people who were about civil liberties, free speech, anti war,
Speaker 1: things like that on one side, but they drifted over
Speaker 1: economically to socialism economically. And then on the other side
Speaker 1: you had the conservatives who were for free markets and
Speaker 1: things like that, but they drifted towards a kind of
Speaker 1: nationalistic pro war fascism because of business interest. That was
Speaker 1: kind of the dichotomy that we had through most of
Speaker 1: the twentieth century. But now it is completely changed in
Speaker 1: the political spectrum. And so he says, the current Democrat
Speaker 1: Party is everything that the old liberals used to fight against.
Speaker 1: They have become the party of reckless spending, the party
Speaker 1: of encouraging war, the party of censoring speech and media
Speaker 1: that they don't like, and the party of authoritarian oversight.
Speaker 1: It's the power that has corrupted them. The power that
Speaker 1: they have to watch everything that we do with a
Speaker 1: surveillance state has turned to solitarian life left and to
Speaker 1: Orwellian dictators. On the economic side, the Democrat Party has
Speaker 1: simply become the party of socialism. And this always of
Speaker 1: course ends in communism. And again this is something that
Speaker 1: the last couple of days people have discovered that Commie
Speaker 1: la Law Harris. Her father is an economics professor, and
Speaker 1: her father just like Booty Gay's father, both of them professors,
Speaker 1: both of them communists. Here's what her economics professor was
Speaker 1: writing about, Donald Harris, capital accumulation and income distribution. What
Speaker 1: he means is redistribution. And of course she supports reparations,
Speaker 1: but of course she supports all kinds, all forms of
Speaker 1: income redistribution. Communism. And when you look at Bootyguay, his
Speaker 1: father life work. Life's work was about the founder of
Speaker 1: the Italian Communist Party, Antonio Gramsey. And you say, well,
Speaker 1: what difference does that make to us in America, the
Speaker 1: Italian Communist or whatever. No, Gramsey was the person who said,
Speaker 1: we're not going to have a violent revolution like the
Speaker 1: French Revolution or the Russian Revolution. What we're going to
Speaker 1: do in America is we're going to have a communist
Speaker 1: revolution by marching through the institutions. And so we're going
Speaker 1: to take over big corporations and make them oriented towards Marxism,
Speaker 1: which we see educational institutions, the government, et cetera. Hollywood,
Speaker 1: Let's march through all these different institutions. That tactic, that
Speaker 1: strategy is what has worked everybody looks around and saying, well,
Speaker 1: why is it that all the companies and all these
Speaker 1: institutions have been taken over? Well, that was a deliberate strategy,
Speaker 1: and it was a strategy that was celebrated and am
Speaker 1: pushed forward by Boudyguey's father and then La La Harris's
Speaker 1: economics professor. Dad was a Marxist professor. So we have
Speaker 1: full on Marxists. And then for Republicans, we've got a
Speaker 1: Kennedy and a New York Democrat friend of Jeffrey Epstein Trump.
Speaker 1: It's unfathomable to me, says QTR thatday presidential candidate wants
Speaker 1: to make raising taxes further and price controls part of
Speaker 1: their fiscal policy. Well, what do you think this bipartisan
Speaker 1: agreement to make the irs seven times bigger is? For
Speaker 1: it is not to raise taxes and to squeeze us
Speaker 1: for every last penny. That's precisely why they did that,
Speaker 1: and it was bipartisan that actually even got worse here.
Speaker 1: Kevin McCarthy pulled back a little bit, said well, let's
Speaker 1: not make it seven times bigger, let's make it only
Speaker 1: five times bigger. And so what this is what we
Speaker 1: get the difference between the Democrats and Republicans is a
Speaker 1: seven times bigger IRS versus a five times bigger IRS.
Speaker 1: And then when they pushed out Kevin McCarthy and they
Speaker 1: put in this Bible thumping conservative Mike Johnson, he goes
Speaker 1: back to the seven times bigger What about thou shalt
Speaker 1: Matt Steel? Mike, do you ever read that? That's where
Speaker 1: were There's not any difference, not any difference between them.
Speaker 1: What we found four years ago was it Trump is
Speaker 1: a globalist wolf in populist sheep clothing. I hope you
Speaker 1: saw the zipper. I've been trying to show everybody the
Speaker 1: zipper on Trump for the wolf's clothing for a long time.
Speaker 1: It was pretty obvious, actually even more obvious, and the
Speaker 1: zippers on the costumes of the monkeys in two thousand
Speaker 1: and one at the beginning of that movie. By withdrawing
Speaker 1: from the race and putting his support behind President Trump,
Speaker 1: RFK Junior could easily help sway crucial votes that could
Speaker 1: help the nature return power to the people and away
Speaker 1: from the political elites who wield it. Yeah, you believe that.
Speaker 1: Or the other thing that could happen is that the
Speaker 1: five percent of the people if the polls are correct,
Speaker 1: the roughly five percent of the people that are now
Speaker 1: behind r f K Junior just may walk away and
Speaker 1: not vote at all. Why do you think they were
Speaker 1: supporting r FK Junior had they seen the zippers on Trump. Well,
Speaker 1: maybe we'll see the zippers on r FK again. You know,
Speaker 1: we need to start building things from the ground up.
Speaker 1: And yeah, that's why I think, you know what what
Speaker 1: doctor Shiva is doing in terms of trying to get
Speaker 1: people focus on that. You know, I think that's an
Speaker 1: important thing. And I think it's an important thing. If
Speaker 1: you look at you want another protest vote or whatever,
Speaker 1: to look at the Constitution Party. If they're there, that's
Speaker 1: a protest against this cult of death that the Democrat
Speaker 1: Party has become. RFK Junior is going to endorse Trump
Speaker 1: on Friday morning, everyone is saying, And of course we
Speaker 1: know that, you know, even a billionaire as his running
Speaker 1: mate Nicole Shanahan, doesn't really matter when so much money
Speaker 1: is being used to buy favors in Washington. This is
Speaker 1: just a pageant, but it's really more than that. It's
Speaker 1: how these people get rich. How do you have somebody
Speaker 1: like Obama who's a communist organizer. Oh, community organizer, right, No,
Speaker 1: he's a communist organizer. How do you get somebody who's
Speaker 1: never had a job that really paid anything till he
Speaker 1: got into a political office and those jobs didn't pay
Speaker 1: that much. But now he's like a billionaire. How did
Speaker 1: he get all that stuff? Oh? Yeah, well, you know,
Speaker 1: it is an advanced auction of stolen goods. And when
Speaker 1: you look at what Laala Harris got just this first month,
Speaker 1: half a billion dollars, that's more than he can get
Speaker 1: I think from Shanahan. RFK Junior can get from Shanahan.
Speaker 1: I mean, she's she got a billion dollars when she
Speaker 1: divorced the co founder of Google, Sergei Brinn, but that'd
Speaker 1: be half of her fortune. I don't think she's going
Speaker 1: to pour half of her fortune into it. And quite frankly,
Speaker 1: I don't think this is anything new. I think this
Speaker 1: is something When we saw that phone call, and it
Speaker 1: seems like r. F. K. Junior's son released that, and
Speaker 1: it made r F K Junior upset. He apologized, you know,
Speaker 1: criticize his son for doing that. His son probably realized
Speaker 1: at that point when Trump is talking to him and
Speaker 1: Trump says, this is be really good for you if
Speaker 1: you join with me, you know that type of thing.
Speaker 1: And he could hear that on the phone, and so
Speaker 1: he recorded with his phone and then put it out.
Speaker 1: And it was probably at that point that the deal
Speaker 1: was made. And I suspect that's why his son put
Speaker 1: it out, because he felt that his dad had caved.
Speaker 1: His son, like probably most of the RFK Junior supporters,
Speaker 1: I would think so disgusted with Trump that they would
Speaker 1: not vote for him even if RFK Junior endorses him.
Speaker 1: Jdvan said, look at our argument to RFK Junior, and
Speaker 1: I'll make it right now, because of course he hasn't
Speaker 1: dropped out yet. My argument is, look, if you want
Speaker 1: a Democrat party that has protected American workers and stood
Speaker 1: for strong borders, maybe disagreed with Republicans on things like
Speaker 1: tax policy. He said, that party doesn't exist anymore. Well,
Speaker 1: you know what, neither does the low tax America First,
Speaker 1: pro life, pro liberty, pro constitution Gup, that party doesn't
Speaker 1: exist anymore either, except in your imagining. They want you
Speaker 1: to imagine that. They want you to imagine that all
Speaker 1: of your angst and your money and your efforts for
Speaker 1: the presidency are going to matter one way or the other,
Speaker 1: and they're not. They just wanted to stract you from
Speaker 1: what's real. RFKA Junior again is going to drop out tomorrow,
Speaker 1: I believe. The Kennedy campaign announced the hold an event
Speaker 1: in Phoenix on Friday morning. Trump meanwhile, was also set
Speaker 1: to host an event on Friday night in Glendale, which
Speaker 1: is a suburb of Phoenix. So that's what you can
Speaker 1: expect to see. He'll say I'm out and I'm endorsing Trump,
Speaker 1: and then he'll get to share the stage with him
Speaker 1: on Friday night tomorrow night. So again, it is all
Speaker 1: a reality TV show. Why did they wait? Why did
Speaker 1: they wait? Why didn't he just do it when the
Speaker 1: phone call was made. They're going to wait till Friday.
Speaker 1: Friday's not even a good news day to release stuff
Speaker 1: because people start to fall off on Fridays, and so
Speaker 1: a lot of times you'll see in the especially in
Speaker 1: the afternoon and evening of Friday, they'll release news that
Speaker 1: they really don't want to have a lot of attention
Speaker 1: for the government. Will they know how to control that.
Speaker 1: But they're going to do this on Friday because they're
Speaker 1: going to wait until the last hurrah at the Democrat convention.
Speaker 1: Democrat Convention is soaking up all the media. I mean,
Speaker 1: Trump hasn't just been setting it out. He's been going
Speaker 1: around making trips and holding rallies and anything, but getting
Speaker 1: virtually no coverage except in the Trump media. All the
Speaker 1: coverage has been focused on DNC, and it's all been
Speaker 1: fawning coverage. If you want to throw up, just take
Speaker 1: a look at the Drudge report. Makes it makes me
Speaker 1: sick to see it, but you have to look at it.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's just as part of the job this,
Speaker 1: you know, all the hagiography stuff about coach and all
Speaker 1: the rest of the stuff is like, oh, give me
Speaker 1: a break. But they are sucking up all of the
Speaker 1: of the press cycles and everything. So they're gonna wait
Speaker 1: to all this stuff is done, and then they just
Speaker 1: put their campaign essentially on pause, knowing that they're not
Speaker 1: going to get any coverage, and so they're going to
Speaker 1: try to revive it and hit it big for the
Speaker 1: weekend after this stops. And so that's why they're going
Speaker 1: to do this. I mean, it's all it's all pretty
Speaker 1: obvious if you stop and think about it. We're gonna
Speaker 1: take a quick break and we'll be right back analyzing
Speaker 1: the globalists next move and now the deep a nutshell.
Speaker 1: Let's talk a little bit about pharma, big pharma. You
Speaker 1: know these people Trump wants to get rid of the
Speaker 1: pharmaceutical lobbyist or something. They got this revolving doors like yeah,
Speaker 1: you mean like everybody in your administration, from the head
Speaker 1: of HHS on down to your two FDA chiefs who
Speaker 1: both went to One of them went to back to Pfizer,
Speaker 1: the other one goes to Murderna. Give me a break.
Speaker 1: But let's talk about ivermectin, for example, because I had
Speaker 1: not seen this, even though this has been floating around
Speaker 1: for a while, I looked at it. People have been
Speaker 1: talking about ivermectin. Maybe there's a side effect of ivermectin.
Speaker 1: And especially because doctor Michael Jayden, who I really have
Speaker 1: a lot of respect for. I respect his medical judgment,
Speaker 1: but especially his integrity, he could be wrong about this.
Speaker 1: And that's what this article is about. Expose News. As
Speaker 1: they said, doctor Mike y Aiden has vehemently stated publicly
Speaker 1: that ivermectin is one of the most violent fertility toxins
Speaker 1: he has ever come across. Well, that's pretty important if
Speaker 1: that's the case. In response to doctor Tess Laurie reviewed
Speaker 1: the first study included in the article that doctor Yaden
Speaker 1: shared with her to see if it showed proof that
Speaker 1: ivermectin caused infertility. She says, it's now clear to many,
Speaker 1: including me, that the globalist agenda is one of eugenics.
Speaker 1: Of course it's eugenics, but it's also depopulation, said, greatly
Speaker 1: reducing the world's population. That's what the climate mcguffin's about,
Speaker 1: the pandemic mcguffin, all of that, and then also about
Speaker 1: changing the genetics of those who remain. The possibility that ever,
Speaker 1: and we're going to talk about the nanotech and the
Speaker 1: longer term plan of this, going back to twenty fifteen
Speaker 1: the i Tripoli, the Institute of Electrical Electronic Engineers. The
Speaker 1: possibility that ivermectin, through a potential effect on fertility, may
Speaker 1: be part of the globalist, dastardly genocidal plan is a
Speaker 1: fairly novel one that I'll explore here today, she said.
Speaker 1: The notion that ivermectin may cause infertility has been floating
Speaker 1: around since twenty twenty one, based on decade old, mainly
Speaker 1: animal studies. After scanning such studies in twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1: I did not find the claim to be credible based
Speaker 1: on the supporting evidence. The animal studies being shared as
Speaker 1: proof I found to involve very high doses of ivermictin
Speaker 1: given for long periods with a very short term follow up.
Speaker 1: Anything given in high doses, including overdosing on water, can
Speaker 1: cause harm. And I've made that point repeatedly when talking
Speaker 1: about fluoridation of water. A good example of this, One
Speaker 1: of the most famous examples was a gag on a
Speaker 1: radio program where they had some contestants and they were
Speaker 1: having them constantly drink water, and they were doing other things,
Speaker 1: but they wouldn't let them go to the bathroom. And
Speaker 1: there was a woman who died from that just having
Speaker 1: too much water. She was smaller than the other contestants.
Speaker 1: They were all drinking the same amount of water. Then
Speaker 1: she died from that. And so, yeah, even water can
Speaker 1: kill you if you overdose on it. And so I
Speaker 1: would always say that about fluoride. There's a lot of
Speaker 1: studies that show that it is correlated, highly correlated to
Speaker 1: a decrease in IQ. Harvard has done studies about that
Speaker 1: and others. But I said, how how do you justify
Speaker 1: regardless of you want to defend fluoride, Well, how can
Speaker 1: you defend medicating people through the water supply because you
Speaker 1: can't control the dosage. And why would you give the
Speaker 1: same dosage to a baby that you give to an
Speaker 1: adult man. And yet we had with the vaccines. When
Speaker 1: you look at the different lots of the m RNA
Speaker 1: trump shots, they were all over the place in terms
Speaker 1: of dosage. From the lowest to the highest dose was
Speaker 1: a difference of thirty three times. And the people got
Speaker 1: that highest dose those are the ones and those lot numbers. Again,
Speaker 1: you're you're just you're playing by lot. You're drawing lots,
Speaker 1: if you will, are playing Russian roulette. And the people
Speaker 1: who got the most concentrated lots, that's where you had
Speaker 1: the concentration of all the immediate deaths. And immediately had
Speaker 1: issues with that. But she said back in twenty twenty one,
Speaker 1: which I didn't see this assertion about ivermecton back in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty one. If I had, it would have reported it.
Speaker 1: I never reported about concerns about ivermectin and fertility. I
Speaker 1: had not seen those studies back in twenty twenty one,
Speaker 1: where this assertion was doing the rounds on social media.
Speaker 1: It felt to me to be more like a distraction
Speaker 1: as it does now. She said. However, due to repeat
Speaker 1: a public engagement on this topic by doctor Mike Yiden,
Speaker 1: I've decided to revisit it. Jayden, an ex drug company
Speaker 1: executive turned truther, has vehemently stated one of the most
Speaker 1: violent fertility toxins he has ever come across. So she says,
Speaker 1: I'm a little surprised by Yiden's certainty on this matter. However,
Speaker 1: since his area of interest in drug development was primarily
Speaker 1: in respiratory, anti allergy and inflammation drugs, I expect he
Speaker 1: knows a lot about ivermectin, which is known to be
Speaker 1: an excellent, low cost, anti inflammatory and immune modulating old medicine.
Speaker 1: If the globalists were are secretly pro ivermectin, and if
Speaker 1: they are delighted that this widespread use for worms and
Speaker 1: other infections, inflammation, and for cancer will continue to genocide,
Speaker 1: then why are all the doctors who use ivermectin being
Speaker 1: censored and losing their licenses? She says, Why aren't we
Speaker 1: being embraced into the globalist fold and showered with money
Speaker 1: from gates and with media coverage. So she said, I've
Speaker 1: just taken a look at the first study on the
Speaker 1: list that was shared with me by doctor Jayden. She said,
Speaker 1: it's a twenty fifteen Iranian study that was conducted on rabbits.
Speaker 1: She said, if the equivalent amount of dosage that was
Speaker 1: given to the rabbits were to be conducted in human subjects,
Speaker 1: she said, it would be equivalent to a daily dose
Speaker 1: of two hundred and forty milligrams per day for fifty
Speaker 1: six days, which would be twenty of the twelve milligram
Speaker 1: tablets a day. She said, you know they sell these things,
Speaker 1: and got a picture of it in the article if
Speaker 1: you can pull that up, Yeah, right there. They sell
Speaker 1: these things in strips of ten, So be like taking
Speaker 1: two of those strips for es centrally two months is
Speaker 1: what you're talking about. So she said, you know, they
Speaker 1: looked at the rabbits. The first batch they kill them,
Speaker 1: looked at their various organs, liver, kidneys, and lungs. The
Speaker 1: second batch they treated the same way, and then they
Speaker 1: made them with fertile male rabbits over a period of
Speaker 1: two months. Most of the rabbits receiving the avermectin did
Speaker 1: not have offspring during those two months. She said, the questions.
Speaker 1: Then we can we deduce from this, well, did these
Speaker 1: female rabbits remain infertile once the ivermactin cleared their system?
Speaker 1: We don't know. On the second mating there were more
Speaker 1: offspring than the first, so a time, it is quite
Speaker 1: likely that fertility might have returned to normal over time.
Speaker 1: But they didn't run the test for very long, she said.
Speaker 1: Would giving a human female twenty of these tablets a
Speaker 1: day for fifty six days would similarly impact fertility? Quite possibly?
Speaker 1: Would it be reversible? She says? Quite possibly. We just
Speaker 1: don't know because no scientist is likely to do such
Speaker 1: a study on human beings because it would be pointless
Speaker 1: and dangerous. She said. Can we deduce some of the
Speaker 1: study that ivermictin is an effective eugenics tool for the
Speaker 1: global depopulation jenda? No, I don't think so, she said.
Speaker 1: In addition, the fact that such a high total dose
Speaker 1: did not kill the little rabbits seems to prove what
Speaker 1: the databases testify to, which is that it is safe.
Speaker 1: Do I think the globalists might try to use ivermecten
Speaker 1: as part of their depopulation agenda? Yes? I do. It's
Speaker 1: clear that the globalists want to get access to our
Speaker 1: bodies to inject stuff. It occurred to me as far
Speaker 1: back as twenty twenty one they might well be planning
Speaker 1: an ivermectin injection to be rolled out in due course,
Speaker 1: and we'll see these being developed in by the usual suspects.
Speaker 1: The ivermatin injection deployed by these sociopaths would most likely
Speaker 1: contain the same kind of harmful nanotech and mRNA biology
Speaker 1: with liquid nanoparticles and assorted other toxic ingredients. But again
Speaker 1: that's her conclusion. So this is something that's going back
Speaker 1: and forth. I thought it was important to talk about it,
Speaker 1: just as we mentioned people saying that they've had some
Speaker 1: success in terms of treating cancer with ivermectin. So we'll
Speaker 1: pass that on. You make your own determination about that.
Speaker 1: But I just want to visit again what we are
Speaker 1: seeing more and more of various studies showing nanotech in
Speaker 1: the mRNA vaccines and so in this particular and this
Speaker 1: is I talked about this the other day. This is
Speaker 1: this most recent article is from wine Press News, a
Speaker 1: new detailed study from Japan showing certain batches of mRNA
Speaker 1: vaccines produced by Ffiser Moderna. I already covered this, but
Speaker 1: I wanted to cover it a little bit more in
Speaker 1: detail and show you some of the pictures that were there.
Speaker 1: And again I always you know, people were talking about
Speaker 1: nanotech stuff and interaction with magnets and stuff. Very very
Speaker 1: early on, I didn't feel like that was there was
Speaker 1: enough evidence to make that credible. However, after people had
Speaker 1: been talking about that. If you remember, we had in Japan,
Speaker 1: and that may be one of the reasons why they're
Speaker 1: doing this study. In Japan, the Japanese government got rid
Speaker 1: of one point two million doses because they said they
Speaker 1: started having black particulates. So they had these things sitting there,
Speaker 1: maybe they didn't have them properly refrigerated, and they started
Speaker 1: noticing black precipitates coming out of it. And they said
Speaker 1: that they interacted with magnets. It's like whooah, and they
Speaker 1: threw those away. Now that's hard data right there, hard data.
Speaker 1: And so and then I believe they did it a
Speaker 1: second time with about a million batches. That happened I
Speaker 1: think twice. I don't think it was the same report
Speaker 1: put out twice, but I think they got rid of
Speaker 1: about two million all told, and two different batches that
Speaker 1: had that. And I had said from the very beginning.
Speaker 1: Why is it that they're keeping these vaccines at such
Speaker 1: a very, very very low temperature. And I thought that
Speaker 1: was suspicious and so perhaps maybe that was what happened
Speaker 1: with it. Maybe it was not refrigerated properly. Maybe these
Speaker 1: things started to activate. I mean, you keep this stuff
Speaker 1: super super cold. I mean it was you know, they
Speaker 1: were packing this with like dry ice or something, and
Speaker 1: the I would imagine that as they saw this stuff
Speaker 1: out that and I talked about that in August of
Speaker 1: twenty twenty. They're already talking about what they were going
Speaker 1: to do to put it out. They were giving instructions
Speaker 1: to people about how to track who had it, how
Speaker 1: to track the lot numbers and all the rest of
Speaker 1: the stuff. And they were talking about the fact that
Speaker 1: they had six doses of this profile and you had
Speaker 1: to thaw it out and you had to use it
Speaker 1: within a certain period of time. What's going on with that?
Speaker 1: What happens if it goes beyond that? There was no word.
Speaker 1: I thought that's kind of interesting. Yeah, they they don't
Speaker 1: say what happens if this is left at room temperature
Speaker 1: for too long? And maybe it was to keep people
Speaker 1: from seeing what happens when you warm it up when
Speaker 1: you inject it into a body. Observable real time injuries
Speaker 1: at the cellular level and recipients of the injectibles are
Speaker 1: documented here for the first time with the presentation of
Speaker 1: a comprehensive description and an analysis of observed phenomena. They said,
Speaker 1: as I reported before, visible artificial self assembling entities ranging
Speaker 1: from about one to one hundred micrometers or greater, of
Speaker 1: many different shapes. There were animated worm like entities, disks, chains, spirals, tubes,
Speaker 1: right angle structures containing other artificial entities within them, and
Speaker 1: so forth. Here's some pictures of some of those. And
Speaker 1: as time progressed during incubation, simple one and two dimensional
Speaker 1: structures over two or three weeks became more complex and
Speaker 1: shape and size, developing into stereoscopically visible entities in three dimensions.
Speaker 1: They resembled carbon nanotube filaments, ribbons, and tapes, some appearing
Speaker 1: as transparent, thin flat membranes, and others as three dimensional
Speaker 1: spirals and beaded chains. And so when you look at these,
Speaker 1: there's another picture of the different things that they saw
Speaker 1: under a microscope. And then in one of these experiments,
Speaker 1: and again this is something I had not talked about previously.
Speaker 1: They under two hundred times magnification. They had semen with
Speaker 1: normal saline as a control added after two hours, and
Speaker 1: then they also put in a flu vaccine added as
Speaker 1: control after one and a half hours. Showed the sperm
Speaker 1: cells with intact morphology and with typical progressive natural reduction
Speaker 1: and sperm motility. But then they did it with the
Speaker 1: Phiser injectables and after one hour all sperm motility ceased.
Speaker 1: They're dead MODERNA same thing. After one hour of adding
Speaker 1: the MODERNA to the sperm cells, they were all completely immobile.
Speaker 1: And then they did it with novavacs, because these are
Speaker 1: the three vaccines that are approved in the US, and
Speaker 1: one hour after novavacs all motility cease. That's the one
Speaker 1: that doctor Peter McCullough thinks is great. Yeah, the novavacs
Speaker 1: try that, And so again they found various coils, ribbons, spirals,
Speaker 1: and the Phiser distilled water. Same thing with the MODERNA,
Speaker 1: beaded chains, assorted structures and distilled water. As these things
Speaker 1: start to come together, and then they expose them to
Speaker 1: magnetic fields that were all that strong from things like
Speaker 1: a hard disk drive or a power brick that you
Speaker 1: would use for your cell phone or something like that,
Speaker 1: and it started reorganizing them into different geometries. As a
Speaker 1: matter of fact, here's another picture of the spirals and
Speaker 1: the other things that they were not injected, but they
Speaker 1: started assembling and appearing sometime after they had them at
Speaker 1: room temperature. Again, this is done in Japan, where they
Speaker 1: had to throw away millions of these vials because they
Speaker 1: saw dark particulates there that interacted with magnets. I'm sure
Speaker 1: the same thing happened elsewhere, but the governments didn't want
Speaker 1: to talk about it, so Winepress News says. Yet, hundreds
Speaker 1: of millions ran off to get these shots, and now
Speaker 1: their DNA and cells have been hacked. Every organ in
Speaker 1: blood polluted with self assembling nanotech, and I've yet to
Speaker 1: see any real ways to get rid of this stuff
Speaker 1: out of your body. That's why hopefully you didn't take
Speaker 1: them to begin with, and why I was emphatically warning
Speaker 1: others not to do so right from the get go.
Speaker 1: He said, me too, me too. We could all smell
Speaker 1: a rat if you knew anything about how these pharmaceutical
Speaker 1: companies work, how the media works, how the government works.
Speaker 1: If you knew the background of DARPA and BARDA and
Speaker 1: all the rest of these, none more so than the
Speaker 1: He said, you've got a lot of people who are
Speaker 1: pushing this, none more so than the losers and liars
Speaker 1: and a lot of religious organizations. And that's very true.
Speaker 1: You know, it was sad to see people like Franklin Graham.
Speaker 1: I think Franklin Graham just didn't have any discernment. He
Speaker 1: got paracarditis, he got one of the real vaccines, and
Speaker 1: they did the heart disease to him. And then you
Speaker 1: got people like Al Mohler, who was president of one
Speaker 1: of the biggest Southern Baptist Theological seminary of Southern Baptist
Speaker 1: Theological Seminary was the title of it, and he just
Speaker 1: herited verbatim. This is a guy who's not only is
Speaker 1: he the present of a seminary college or whatever, but
Speaker 1: he's also got a podcast where he talks about current
Speaker 1: evincent news and he's absolutely clueless or he just decided
Speaker 1: that he was going to push this stuff along, because
Speaker 1: what he did was he quoted verbatim from all of
Speaker 1: the calculated, deceiving lies that had been even tested by
Speaker 1: Yale and in July of twenty twenty. I remember, you know,
Speaker 1: I talked about this in depth. There's about a dozen
Speaker 1: different lies that they were going to try to manipulate
Speaker 1: people with, and Yale had actually even done like a
Speaker 1: controlled experiment. You know, they had one group that was
Speaker 1: not told a lie, and then another group that was
Speaker 1: told one of these dozen lies, and they evaluated each
Speaker 1: one of the lies in terms of its efficacy. And
Speaker 1: I said, you know, there is no science in this
Speaker 1: except for behavioral science, and nothing has been tested except
Speaker 1: for their lies. And they went to a great deal
Speaker 1: of trouble to see, well, is it telling people that
Speaker 1: they're going to feel really bad if they don't get
Speaker 1: the shot and one of their family members gets it,
Speaker 1: because maybe they gave it to them, and maybe they
Speaker 1: wouldn't have transmitted it to them if they'd had the vaccine.
Speaker 1: All of those lies stacked one on top of the other,
Speaker 1: the lie that you know you're not going to transmit
Speaker 1: it if you get the vaccine. Oh that you know
Speaker 1: that's been proven to be a lie, But we knew
Speaker 1: it was a gonna lie anyway, And you know it
Speaker 1: was the kind of thing, well, you know, you should
Speaker 1: thank God for science because this is a moonshot. I
Speaker 1: mean that was verbatim what they had in the Ale study,
Speaker 1: and it was verbatim what al Moller told people. It's
Speaker 1: like a moonshot, and on and on. You should do
Speaker 1: this to love your neighbor. That was the favorite lie
Speaker 1: of these people that are looked up to within the church.
Speaker 1: And there's others like Robert Jeffries, the first Baptist Dallas.
Speaker 1: This guy is always at the side of Trump, just
Speaker 1: like Paula White and Robert Jeffries joined with Curtis Cheng.
Speaker 1: That guy was He graduated from Yale, not Yale, Duke
Speaker 1: rather and with a theology degree. I don't know he's
Speaker 1: ever passed to church. But he got lots of money
Speaker 1: from the AD Council. You know. Trump gave the AD
Speaker 1: Council two hundred and fifty million dollars more than they've
Speaker 1: ever had for any campaign where they ever had for
Speaker 1: only you can prevent forest fires or this is your
Speaker 1: brain on drugs or just say no or any of
Speaker 1: this stuff. Right, We've been hectored with all this garbage
Speaker 1: at our expense from the AD Council for years, and
Speaker 1: yet Trump gave this money to people like Curtis Chang.
Speaker 1: He set up websites, he had people come on with him,
Speaker 1: and he did a lot of work with Robert Jeffries,
Speaker 1: and they targeted church leaders and pastors to tell them,
Speaker 1: this is what you tell your people. It was insidious,
Speaker 1: it was disgusting. Still makes me really angry. It makes
Speaker 1: me really angry, just like this so Weather.
Speaker 7: Admitting that the new force inoculations coming next year will
Speaker 7: actually maim and kill a lot of people. Because Bill
Speaker 7: Gates Dozy can't hide it. That's why Trump is taking
Speaker 7: control of the process, saying he's going to have an early
Speaker 7: vaccine from a company that doesn't make one that is
Speaker 7: so dangerous or that doesn't change our DNA. And I'm
Speaker 7: not even endorsing what Trump's doing, but I understand what
Speaker 7: he's doing. And I'm not even endorsing what Trump's doing.
Speaker 7: And I'm not even endorsing what Trump's doing. He goes
Speaker 7: trust my vaccine, but don't trust the CDC's vaccine. And
Speaker 7: then I went and looked up the ones that Trump's
Speaker 7: looking at. They're very weak, attenuated classic viruses with a very.
Speaker 1: Low amount of adjivant in it. And what is agivate?
Speaker 7: It makes your body have an autoimmune response wayleen or
Speaker 7: the mercury or the aluminum to trigger that. And so yeah,
Speaker 7: Trump's looking at basically sugar water. For folks, Can we
Speaker 7: take a little bit of an attenuated microwaved or radiated.
Speaker 1: A deal abs a freaking legally. Yeah, he saw that.
Speaker 1: That article he pulled up was from September of twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: so it was the September October when he's telling people that.
Speaker 1: Uh so, yeah, the people who are telling us to
Speaker 1: trust Trump, trust the science, and trust Alex all the
Speaker 1: rest of this stuff. Rumble North American House, Hippoh, thank
Speaker 1: you very much for the tip. I appreciate that Trump's
Speaker 1: true believers constantly celebrate how he's anti war, didn't start
Speaker 1: any new wars, won't start any more wars. If that's
Speaker 1: the case, how are we supposed to get their war
Speaker 1: worth they were on. Yeah, Well, the other thing is
Speaker 1: he didn't stop any wars either. He criticizes and rightfully
Speaker 1: so Biden for the way, you know, the fire drill
Speaker 1: of getting out of Afghanistan. Maybe if Trump had gotten
Speaker 1: us out of there within the four years that he
Speaker 1: was there, but they weren't about to do that. They
Speaker 1: didn't voluntarily leave. They were thrown out. It wasn't a
Speaker 1: fire drill exit. They were thrown out. They didn't have
Speaker 1: any intention of ever leaving. They were there to grow
Speaker 1: to supply opioids out of Afghanistan. That's that, and having
Speaker 1: access to the lithium that was there, that's why they
Speaker 1: were there. They had no intention of ever leaving. Well,
Speaker 1: back to the nanotech. This is an article from Technocracy News,
Speaker 1: and actually it is a references an article from twenty
Speaker 1: fifteen from the I Tripoli, which is the Institute of
Speaker 1: Electrical and Electronic Engineers. That's kind of trade publication of
Speaker 1: W's electrical Engineers. I haven't looked at it for forty years.
Speaker 1: I guess he used to read it all the time. Anyway,
Speaker 1: he points out, you know, they've talked for the longest
Speaker 1: time about the Internet of things, and again this I
Speaker 1: triple article twenty fifteen. In two thousand and eleven, twenty twelve,
Speaker 1: I think it's twenty twelve. You had David Petraeus, who
Speaker 1: was then the director of the CIA, and he made
Speaker 1: the statement that we're going to be listening to you
Speaker 1: with your smart refrigerator. We're going to have the ability
Speaker 1: to hear what you're doing, and we reported that and
Speaker 1: everybody said, you're a bunch of conspiracy theorists. It's like, no,
Speaker 1: that's his conspiracy and it's not a theory. He's talking
Speaker 1: about how they're going to do that. Well, they call
Speaker 1: that the Internet of Things, and that is very concerning
Speaker 1: as well. It's one of the reasons why they need
Speaker 1: to have five G is to connect all of these
Speaker 1: things that are out there, and the things include not
Speaker 1: just your appliances, your smart home, your smart car, your smartphone,
Speaker 1: and use that to really kind of keep track of
Speaker 1: you actually even talk about the Internet of bodies and
Speaker 1: the Internet of everything. But Big Pharma, the military are
Speaker 1: talking about the Internet of bio nano things, bio nano things,
Speaker 1: and as Technocracy News says, you're actually getting the Internet
Speaker 1: of Universal Skynet. So this paper goes back to March
Speaker 1: of twenty fifteen. The Internet of bio nano things is
Speaker 1: a final building block of the surveillance network, bridging all
Speaker 1: living things from the biochemical domain into the electrical domain
Speaker 1: of the Internet. And so the abstract from the Actripoli
Speaker 1: paper twenty fifteen says, the Internet of Things is become
Speaker 1: an important research topic in the last decade, where things
Speaker 1: refers to interconnected machines and objects with embedded computing capabilities
Speaker 1: employed to extend the Internet to many application domains, while
Speaker 1: research and development continue for general IoT devices. And again
Speaker 1: we call these things smart, you know, smart devices for
Speaker 1: stupid people, but actually it's an acronym that's been used
Speaker 1: many times self monitoring and reporting technology. There are many
Speaker 1: application domains where very tiny, concealable, non intrusive things are needed,
Speaker 1: and they capitalize the things. You know the thing, as
Speaker 1: Biden would say, well you better know the thing and
Speaker 1: think about that. This is the I triple. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is a this is a tech publication where they
Speaker 1: when I read it forty fifty years ago, they used
Speaker 1: to as always about you know, electronics and stuff like that.
Speaker 1: Now they're talking about how they can wield this technology
Speaker 1: the spy on people. They say, concealable and non intrusive
Speaker 1: things with the capital T. Oh, hope, we got trouble
Speaker 1: right here in urt of city, right the capital T.
Speaker 1: The properties of recently studied nanomterials such as graphene, have
Speaker 1: inspired the concept of Internet of nanothings. Notice the graphene,
Speaker 1: the graphine Despite being an enabler for many applications, the
Speaker 1: artificial nature of the Internet of nanothings devices can be
Speaker 1: detrimental if the deployment of the nanothings could result in
Speaker 1: unwanted effects of health or pollution. The novel paradigm of
Speaker 1: the Internet of bio nanothings is introduced in this paper
Speaker 1: by stemming from synthetic biology and nanotechnology tools that allow
Speaker 1: the engineering of biological embedded computing divine. I think that's
Speaker 1: what we're looking at with this MR and A stuff.
Speaker 1: The Internet of biological nano things stands as a paradigm
Speaker 1: shifting concept for communication and network engineering. The Internet of
Speaker 1: Things defines a cyber physical paradigm where all types of
Speaker 1: real world physical elements, sensors, actuators, personal electronic devices, or
Speaker 1: home appliances, among others, are connected and so now they
Speaker 1: want to connect you. In with that, a novel research
Speaker 1: direction and the engineering of nanoscale devices and systems is
Speaker 1: being pursued in the field of biology. By combining nanotechnology
Speaker 1: with tools from synthetic biology to control, reuse, modify, and
Speaker 1: re engineer biological cells. You're going to hijack your body.
Speaker 1: And that was what they were talking about from the
Speaker 1: very beginning Moderna, you know, they were Pfizer jumped in
Speaker 1: with this technology, but Moderna had been working with it
Speaker 1: for ten years and they'd been making money on the
Speaker 1: stock market by giving people happy stories about some miracle
Speaker 1: cure that they had for this or that, but nothing
Speaker 1: had ever panned out until Trump and Fauci, and then
Speaker 1: they bring Fizer in. By the way, they talked about
Speaker 1: it from the very beginning, I said, well, this should
Speaker 1: be a dead stop for you when they come around
Speaker 1: and remember the meeting that Trump set up and everybody,
Speaker 1: how long is it going to take? You, Well, we
Speaker 1: can do it in a year. That's too long, how
Speaker 1: about you, Well, yeah, maybe we can do it in
Speaker 1: a little bit less time. They give a time and
Speaker 1: he goes around the table and he's already got everybody
Speaker 1: there in decreasing order for your benefit. You know. Again,
Speaker 1: it was a pageant. It was a show, just like
Speaker 1: the entire political process, and the last ones he gets
Speaker 1: too Armoderna. They said, well, we can do it right now.
Speaker 1: And what we're going to do is we're not going
Speaker 1: to manufacture the vaccine. Your body is going to manufacture
Speaker 1: the vaccine. We're going to reprogram your body to manufacture
Speaker 1: the vaccine. It's like, Okay, I'm out of this stop
Speaker 1: right there, that's a non starter. Should be a non starter.
Speaker 1: That should have been your clue right there. They're going
Speaker 1: to reprogram your body to produce this stuff, and then
Speaker 1: how are they going to turn it off? And of
Speaker 1: course that is also a question is what is this
Speaker 1: thing doing. A novel research direction of the engineering of
Speaker 1: nanoscale devices and systems is being pursued in the field
Speaker 1: of biology, combining nanotech with tools from synthetic biology to control, reuse, modify,
Speaker 1: and re engineer biological cells. That's what they're doing, re
Speaker 1: engineering the biological cells. A cell can be effectively utilized
Speaker 1: as a substrate to realize a so called bio nanothing.
Speaker 1: The execution of DNA based instructions, the biochemical processing of data,
Speaker 1: the transformation of chemical energy, and the exchange of information
Speaker 1: through the transmission and reception of molecules termed molecular communication
Speaker 1: are at the basis of a plethora of applications that
Speaker 1: will be enabled by the internet of bio nanotech. And
Speaker 1: so you know, when we look at this, when you
Speaker 1: look at DNA and they're talking about DNA based instructions.
Speaker 1: DNA is a very very complicated code. It's got error correction,
Speaker 1: all the rest of this stuff. It is a sign
Speaker 1: of intelligent design. As a matter of fact, doctor Werner
Speaker 1: von I can't remember the guy's name, Werner Witt, I
Speaker 1: think is his name, And he did a book that
Speaker 1: was called in the Beginning There was Information. And what
Speaker 1: he's saying is that the DNA, of course, is one
Speaker 1: of the best examples we've got of intelligent design and
Speaker 1: the discovers of it. Krick and Watson said, well, yes,
Speaker 1: of course, it shows that this that we are designed.
Speaker 1: But it can't be the God. It can't be God,
Speaker 1: it can't be the God of the Bible. So we're
Speaker 1: going to pretend that it's some we'll call it panspermia.
Speaker 1: Some intelligent aliens came here and engineered us and then
Speaker 1: flew away again. But it was always a computer code.
Speaker 1: And so you hear the people here. You've got people
Speaker 1: at the I Tripoli looking at this and saying, how
Speaker 1: can we reprogram this computer code? Right when you look
Speaker 1: at the grain acronym genetics, robotics, artificial intelligence, in nanotech.
Speaker 1: As I've said before, we can see the danger. And
Speaker 1: we can see what is happening with robotics and artificial intelligence,
Speaker 1: but in terms of genetics and nanotech, it's very difficult
Speaker 1: to observe what they're doing, and it's almost impossible to
Speaker 1: imagine what they are doing. I mean, it truly is
Speaker 1: beyond the public's imagination to imagine what is happening with
Speaker 1: nanotech biological cells as the substrates a bio nano thing,
Speaker 1: and then they break it down in the iripol. Again,
Speaker 1: this sounds very much like a computer device, right, They're
Speaker 1: going to hack your body, the DNA computer code that
Speaker 1: is there and all the rest of the stuff to
Speaker 1: do these types of things. And so they said, well,
Speaker 1: we have some examples of how we're going to have
Speaker 1: complex biochemical reactions. We can have a control unit that
Speaker 1: contains embedded software the device. This will correspond to the
Speaker 1: genetic instructions densely packed into the cell's DNA, So that's
Speaker 1: a control unit. We'll have a memory unit that'll kind
Speaker 1: of be the interior of the cell, comprised of molecules
Speaker 1: synthesized by the cell's result of DNA instructions. A processing
Speaker 1: unit that'll correspond to the molecular machinery that from the
Speaker 1: DNA molecules through the so called transcription and translation. That's
Speaker 1: what the mRNA is doing, right. The processing unit generates
Speaker 1: protein molecules of the instruction dependent types and concentrations. The
Speaker 1: processing unit, the power unit that'll be synthesized by the
Speaker 1: cell from energy supplied from the external environment in various forms,
Speaker 1: and provides the energy necessary for the cell's biochemical reactions
Speaker 1: to take place. The transceivers which will allow these systems
Speaker 1: to exchange information that'll be the information bearing molecules. Then
Speaker 1: finally sensing an actuation for example light or mechanical stress
Speaker 1: or changing the chemical characteristics of the environment, mechanically interacting
Speaker 1: with it, or electromagnetics. And so you look at the
Speaker 1: different elements here. Mean they've got this thing broken down
Speaker 1: like some device that they would create. A control unit,
Speaker 1: a memory unit, a processing unit, a power unit, transceivers
Speaker 1: sensing an actuation. This is ten years ago, and they said,
Speaker 1: although this is all still in its infancy, this technology
Speaker 1: has been successfully applied in twenty fifteen for drug delivery,
Speaker 1: gene therapy, artificial blood cell production, and it is expected
Speaker 1: to deliver ideal substrates for synthetic biology with more predictable behavior,
Speaker 1: and so we will be able to they said, randomly
Speaker 1: change parts of genetic programs and have these things selectively evolve. Well,
Speaker 1: I said, conclude, They said, bio nanothings could be used
Speaker 1: to access the human body, either to steal personal health
Speaker 1: related information or even to create new diseases. Is that it
Speaker 1: amazing how evil science has become. The Internet of Nanothings
Speaker 1: proposes to push the limits of this concept of to
Speaker 1: nanotechnology enabled nanoscale devices which can easily be concealed, implanted,
Speaker 1: and scattered in the environment. I mean they're not just
Speaker 1: talking necessarily about injectables putting it in the environment. In general,
Speaker 1: we believe that the Internet of bio nanotechnology research field,
Speaker 1: while still in its infancy in twenty fifteen, will result
Speaker 1: in a game changer technology for the society of tomorrow.
Speaker 1: There you go, technocrats in charge of the I Triple League.
Speaker 1: I guess Werner Get, thank you very much for looking
Speaker 1: that up. Werner Get if you want to look it up.
Speaker 1: And that's w E R R G. I T T
Speaker 1: a great book. He talks about how people who want
Speaker 1: to believe in evolution. It's like, no, what you have
Speaker 1: to have in the beginning is you have to have
Speaker 1: something's going to organize and design everything. Organize and design
Speaker 1: everything that's you know, otherwise a tornado and a junkyard
Speaker 1: isn't going to build a building. It takes a designer.
Speaker 1: You look at something that is as complex as the
Speaker 1: body or any of the systems within the body. We
Speaker 1: have systems within systems within systems. Every single one of
Speaker 1: them has information in it. Well or two thousand years ago,
Speaker 1: John and the other Christians described christ as logos, which
Speaker 1: is exactly what that means, means information purpose, design will
Speaker 1: be right back. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: I want to take a moment to thank our producers.
Speaker 1: I guess we'd call them. I think it's a better
Speaker 1: description than donors, because it's really you who make this
Speaker 1: program possible. I've already counted what we had pretty much
Speaker 1: in zeal from the beginning of the month, but I
Speaker 1: had not recognized the people who had made the donation,
Speaker 1: and so I wanted to take a moment to read
Speaker 1: their first name and last initial to thank them, because
Speaker 1: without them, this program would not be here. Kevin M. Gregory,
Speaker 1: I Michael L, William D, Rogelio J, Manny D, Austin M.
Speaker 1: And Austin is one of several new people this month
Speaker 1: that we had not had as donators before on Zel.
Speaker 1: So many of these people you'll hear these names over
Speaker 1: and over again. They are very faithful supporters, producers, and
Speaker 1: many of them will donate multiple times a month. And
Speaker 1: Austin sent a small donation and testing Zell and so
Speaker 1: I think we got back to them or they saw
Speaker 1: that it was successful and then sent another one later
Speaker 1: in the month. Gretchen C. Maurice, that's one of our
Speaker 1: long term supporters, Maurice W. Robert A, Terry M. Lewis I,
Speaker 1: William R, Stephen S, Jennifer J, Linda M, Kevin R.
Speaker 1: William R, Jeffrey C, Mary M. Many of these long
Speaker 1: term supporters and frequent supporters, Michael P, j H Yes,
Speaker 1: Chris T, Benjamin R. Yes see Benjamin there every month
Speaker 1: a significant contributor. Gretchen C again, Brian P, William R,
Speaker 1: Michael M, William R again, Manny D, Mary M again,
Speaker 1: Jeffrey C again, Kenneth C. And David R. And we
Speaker 1: had of those people, we had one, two, three, four,
Speaker 1: five six that were new, So we do appreciate that. Actually,
Speaker 1: David R Center contribution and told me to cut the
Speaker 1: God grift. Well, it's not a grift, it's a gift,
Speaker 1: and I can't do that. I've already been paid in
Speaker 1: something higher than money to do what I do. But
Speaker 1: let's talk a little bit about that. Then let's talk
Speaker 1: about the censoring of a and firing of a National
Speaker 1: Guard officer because he voiced his Christian beliefs. You know,
Speaker 1: we look at the National Guard and we got Tim
Speaker 1: Walls who skips out before a rock. They drop his
Speaker 1: rank because he didn't complete what he needed to do
Speaker 1: in order to keep that rank. I guess he had
Speaker 1: to get out quickly, no time to finish that coursework
Speaker 1: or whatever. But he continues to inflate his rank and
Speaker 1: he is honored by these people. But this is an Idaho.
Speaker 1: The Idaho Army National Guard Liberty Council has announced it's
Speaker 1: bringing a free speech fight, demanding that the Idaho National
Speaker 1: Guard restore the career of an infantry officer who was
Speaker 1: removed from command and illegally pressured resign because of a
Speaker 1: soldier's complaints. One soldier's complaints ended this guy's career, what
Speaker 1: do he complain about? He complained about this guy saying
Speaker 1: on social media what his personal Christian beliefs were. The
Speaker 1: statements were made as the officer explained on his social
Speaker 1: media his perspectives on gender ideology and on the sexualization
Speaker 1: of children. The officer argued against graphic and obscene children's
Speaker 1: books in a library. Are you for that?
Speaker 9: Oh?
Speaker 1: Okay? Drag events in libraries and schools, and said no
Speaker 1: child is born in the wrong body. He also objected
Speaker 1: to quote the medical mutilation of gender confused children. Me too,
Speaker 1: But the subordinate senior enlisted man complained about it. He
Speaker 1: said he felt threatened. He said, these comments cause a
Speaker 1: hostile work environment. So I guess a friendly work environment
Speaker 1: would be supporting the medical mutilation. I mean, you don't
Speaker 1: want me to have to deal with any hostile environments,
Speaker 1: That's right. What's he going to do when he gets
Speaker 1: into a war, when people are shooting at him, how's
Speaker 1: that going to make him feel? Or if they just
Speaker 1: use Tokyo rose type of stuff? You American troops, why
Speaker 1: you hear you know that type of thing? I don't know, Uh,
Speaker 1: you can't handle it. I feel discriminated against. Oh, well,
Speaker 1: you know what, moderation of content is no virtue. Sorry
Speaker 1: if your feelings are hurt. But that's what happens in
Speaker 1: a free society of free speech. People are going to
Speaker 1: have their feelings hurt. They're going to get angry, they're
Speaker 1: going to be offended. And these people also don't care
Speaker 1: about whether or not this officer who was kicked out,
Speaker 1: how does he feel about that? Well, we really don't
Speaker 1: care about his feelings, right, It always just goes in
Speaker 1: one direction. So the purpose of this complaint is to
Speaker 1: bring to your attention several instances which I believe I
Speaker 1: have faced discriminatory treatment based on my sexual orientation, based
Speaker 1: on defining himself by his sex, as sexual activity, as
Speaker 1: sexual desires. That defines this guy this sum total of
Speaker 1: what he is. I am deeply concerned about the hostile
Speaker 1: prejudice behavior I've experienced, which has adversely affected my well being,
Speaker 1: my work performance, my overall sense of belonging. Liberty Council's
Speaker 1: first intervention in the case has been to notify the
Speaker 1: Governor of Idaho, Brad Little, of the free speech violations,
Speaker 1: because again, the National Guard is technically under the governors
Speaker 1: until it is scarfed up by the federal government in
Speaker 1: certain cases. In this instance, the Idaho Army National Guard,
Speaker 1: they said, has violated the First Amendment, violated the Religious
Speaker 1: Freedom Restoration Act, violated the Idaho Constitution, violated the free
Speaker 1: exercise of the Religious Protection Act. In addition, it has
Speaker 1: become evident this military branch seeks to implement a policy
Speaker 1: of discrimination against religious beliefs of enlisted personnel, says the
Speaker 1: legal team. They explained, as a Christian, the officer believes
Speaker 1: all people are made in God's image, have inherent dignity,
Speaker 1: and are worthy of respect. He is committed to serving
Speaker 1: those under his command, regardless of political or religious disagreements,
Speaker 1: and we give his life in defense of his state
Speaker 1: and nation. You see, even if this person's sexual content
Speaker 1: was his religion, and it is, they are discriminating on
Speaker 1: the basis of one religion versus another. The National Guard
Speaker 1: removed him from command because of the feelings of being
Speaker 1: offended expressed by the subordinate. Then officials pressured him to
Speaker 1: quit and shortly after launched a formal investigation quote based
Speaker 1: on the unconstitutional complaint, said the lawyers defending him. It
Speaker 1: took a year, but that resulted in a recommendation that
Speaker 1: he be permanently barred from command. Further, the investigating officer
Speaker 1: revealed his perspective of enlisted personnel. Quote who hold traditional
Speaker 1: moral values, said, they are extremists. So they had it's
Speaker 1: not just this person who's making the complaint. They put
Speaker 1: an officer in charge of investigating it. And he said
Speaker 1: people who hold traditional moral values such as blah blah
Speaker 1: blah blahah are extremists. Well, people who hold to the
Speaker 1: idea of free speech are also called extremists as well,
Speaker 1: aren't we. Liberty Council founder and chairman Matt Stavers said,
Speaker 1: Governor Brad Little must ensure that the Idaho Army National
Speaker 1: Guard uphold federal and state law and protect free speech
Speaker 1: of enlisted personnel. Well, good luck with that. I mean,
Speaker 1: Brad Little is a Republican, but he was one of
Speaker 1: the worst governors during the lockdown. I should call him
Speaker 1: lockdown Little because and he didn't lock down a little,
Speaker 1: He'd locked down a lot, locked down everything, and he
Speaker 1: was one of the worst ones. He had again, Idaho
Speaker 1: Republican governor and Republican legislature majority. And when Brad Little
Speaker 1: got all the Trump money and locked everybody down and
Speaker 1: closed all the businesses. The Republican legislature was not meeting
Speaker 1: that year, kind of like what Texas they would meet
Speaker 1: every other year, and so they were going to call
Speaker 1: a special session. And as they started to call the
Speaker 1: special session, Brad Little, the governor, came in and shut
Speaker 1: it down, as I said at the time, like some
Speaker 1: kind of colonial governor, dismissing, you know, the legislature, what arrogance.
Speaker 1: He said, no, you're not going to meet. And then
Speaker 1: what he did was he came up with a series
Speaker 1: of measures that he wanted them to do, and it
Speaker 1: was essentially one of the most insidious course of measures
Speaker 1: I saw any of the governors do what he said.
Speaker 1: And he after he wrote this, then he called the
Speaker 1: legislature into session and had them rubber stamp what he did.
Speaker 1: And here's what he did. He said, we're going to
Speaker 1: give immunity, legal immunity to any business that follows all
Speaker 1: of our simons, says superstitions, got to wear a mask,
Speaker 1: got to stay six feet apart, got to do this,
Speaker 1: can't have more than this many people in the building
Speaker 1: and all around, all of that nonsense that we all
Speaker 1: know about. Right, if you as a business, follow all
Speaker 1: of that stuff. If somebody gets sick with the COVID cooties,
Speaker 1: then we will not let them sue you. However, if
Speaker 1: you don't follow each and every one of our little
Speaker 1: Simon says superstitions, anybody can sue you and you will
Speaker 1: be fully liable for everything. It was an open invitation
Speaker 1: for cranks like this guy who got his superior officer
Speaker 1: fired because of his Christian beliefs. It was an open
Speaker 1: invitation for any of these COVID cranks to shut a
Speaker 1: business down forever bankrupt them. That was what Republican Governor
Speaker 1: Brad Little did. So good luck with this thing. This
Speaker 1: guy doesn't support freedom of any way, shape or form.
Speaker 1: On Rock Fann Andromeda one, David your voice of reason, Well,
Speaker 1: thank you. I appreciate that, Thank you very much. And
Speaker 1: I thought this is very interesting. I saw this. This
Speaker 1: is something just came out Tim Allen. You know, he
Speaker 1: is the guy who was for years before Disney went
Speaker 1: complete off the rails, I had Home Improvement. He was
Speaker 1: Tim the Toolman. They would never allow a show like
Speaker 1: that anymore, you know. It was too much making fun
Speaker 1: of masculinity, but not in a hateful way. Right, So
Speaker 1: he was tim the Toolman. Of course he was also
Speaker 1: buzz light Year with toy story. He was a voice
Speaker 1: of that. And he has now said he started reading
Speaker 1: the Bible. He had identified as publicly as a Christian,
Speaker 1: but he said I just started reading the Bible, and
Speaker 1: he said it is amazing. Yeah, you know, Tim is
Speaker 1: it will take you to infinity and beyond. On Timsey,
Speaker 1: he used social media to profess his love of reading
Speaker 1: the Bible. Allen, who calls God the Builder, I posted
Speaker 1: on x that he's taking time to read the Bible,
Speaker 1: amazed by what he finds there. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: in interviews, he is referred to God as the builder,
Speaker 1: you know, like the builder of DNA, builder of everything,
Speaker 1: you know, an intelligent design. Here's an interview from about
Speaker 1: seven years ago. But don't let the antics fool you.
Speaker 8: Alan is a thinking man's clown.
Speaker 1: He'd rather discuss quantum physics than box office numbers, whether
Speaker 1: you're a true believer or a pagan.
Speaker 8: And he spends a lot of time working on that
Speaker 8: curious relationship with.
Speaker 10: God or as he says, the Builder.
Speaker 8: Oh my God, honey, don't see God in church?
Speaker 11: I always do, ask whoever put me here, the builder?
Speaker 11: What did you want me to do?
Speaker 8: Do you think people would be surprised to know how
Speaker 8: deeply religious you or spiritual you are?
Speaker 11: Well, if you know me, you know it. I don't
Speaker 11: push it. I just want a relationship with whoever built me.
Speaker 11: This is too much, too weird that it happened by accident.
Speaker 11: Didn't happen by acient. I don't feel it did.
Speaker 1: No, No, of course not again. Do you look at
Speaker 1: a car, say that accidentally happened. I wonder if I
Speaker 1: can get one of those things that accidentally happened in
Speaker 1: my driveway. No, you ask KU built it? What's the
Speaker 1: make of that? Right? He said, it never took the
Speaker 1: time in all my years to ever read and really
Speaker 1: read the Bible. Currently almost through the Jerusalem Bible, Old
Speaker 1: Testament and almost done with the Prophets next up to
Speaker 1: the New Testament. So far amazing and not at all
Speaker 1: what I was expecting. It doesn't say something that you know,
Speaker 1: people can identify as Christians and go to church for
Speaker 1: such a long time and never read the Bible. It's amazing.
Speaker 1: He's previously addressed faith, most recently in twenty twenty two,
Speaker 1: when he said he fought to put Christ back into
Speaker 1: Christmas for the Disney Plus limited series The Santa Clauses,
Speaker 1: where he reprised his role of Santa Claus from the
Speaker 1: original trilogy of movies. He said, it originally had a
Speaker 1: lot of other worldly characters and ghosts and goblins, and
Speaker 1: I said, no, this is Christmas. It's about Christ. It's
Speaker 1: literally a religious holiday, he said. And you know, I
Speaker 1: understand some people look at Christmas. And I've had a
Speaker 1: lot of Christians who write me and say, you know,
Speaker 1: we don't celebrate Christmas and things like that, and I
Speaker 1: understand that that's that's where my family was. But I
Speaker 1: looked at it and I thought, you know, it's a
Speaker 1: perfect opportunity to talk about Christ, to talk about the incarnation.
Speaker 1: And so in our family, we celebrated it, and we
Speaker 1: didn't shy away from that. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: we didn't just accept it as it was presented to
Speaker 1: us in this kind of syncretism of you know, pagan
Speaker 1: culture and secular culture and myths and everything. But I
Speaker 1: would say to them and say, well, you know, it
Speaker 1: probably wasn't this time of year. There's a lot of
Speaker 1: stuff about wise men and things like that that are
Speaker 1: that are added to it in terms of saying there's
Speaker 1: three of them, and here's their names and things like that.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of elaboration. I think it's very important
Speaker 1: not to mix in false aspects or mythological aspects like
Speaker 1: Santa Claus. And so I would take the opportunity to
Speaker 1: talk to kids about what I believe was real, what
Speaker 1: the Bible said about it, and what I believe was
Speaker 1: pure fabrication that was added Rudolph the reindeer and all
Speaker 1: the rest of this stuff. And just so that they know,
Speaker 1: you know what we are celebrating in Whistler one year,
Speaker 1: because I do it every year, you know, one year
Speaker 1: Whistler says to me, He says, Dad, I know there's
Speaker 1: no Santa Claus. If there was a Santa Claus, it'd
Speaker 1: be in the Bible. So I thought that was an
Speaker 1: interesting take on it from a Whistler. But as he's
Speaker 1: talking about this, he said, you know, I just in
Speaker 1: the interview he said he nearly lost his faith. He
Speaker 1: said he began to question God and faith after his
Speaker 1: father was fatally struck by a driver when he was
Speaker 1: eleven years old. He said, for years, as a regular
Speaker 1: churchgoer he admitted they didn't like the idea of God.
Speaker 1: He was constantly a cynic on matters of faith, but
Speaker 1: he ultimately came around. Eventually he began to see God
Speaker 1: as what he called the Builder. Kenny became start looking
Speaker 1: at intelligent design as we know, you know, creation testifies
Speaker 1: to the fact that there is an intelligent designer day
Speaker 1: after day, night after night. It speaks without words. All
Speaker 1: the creation does. The question is as God spoken to
Speaker 1: us through the Bible, and so he said, I always
Speaker 1: ask the Builder, what do you want me to do?
Speaker 1: He said, And he said, and I do ask it,
Speaker 1: but you've got to be prepared for the answer. Well,
Speaker 1: you might want to instead of just asking, you might
Speaker 1: want to read the long letters that He's written to us,
Speaker 1: which is what Tim Allen is doing right now. You know,
Speaker 1: for many people, religion is about doing, but Christians always
Speaker 1: called it the faith because it's not about your doing.
Speaker 1: It's about trusting what God has said that he has done.
Speaker 1: And while we're talking about this, I just wanted to
Speaker 1: play you what John Lennox, who is a mathematician in
Speaker 1: the UK, Irish mathematician, and he's been well known for
Speaker 1: his debates with a lot of atheists. He's debated Christopher
Speaker 1: Hitchens and Richard Dawkins and many of them. And this
Speaker 1: is what John Lennox said about reading the Bible.
Speaker 8: Doctor Lennox was asked on what would be his final
Speaker 8: words of wisdom to his children.
Speaker 12: Not only to my children, but to anybody.
Speaker 8: Our lives rush past.
Speaker 12: We've become fixated on digital equipment. That's robbing us of time.
Speaker 12: People say to me they've no time, They've loads the time.
Speaker 12: If you want to know how much time you've got to,
Speaker 12: just ask yourself a simple question, how much time have
Speaker 12: I spent in the last week fiddling with a piece
Speaker 12: of digital equipment and doing things that have no relevance
Speaker 12: whatsoever to my profession or my life? And then say,
Speaker 12: have I got any time ourselves of the most important
Speaker 12: thing in life if we're Christians, and that is seeking
Speaker 12: fellowship with God through his word. You will never make
Speaker 12: any impact on this world by reading the Bible for
Speaker 12: five minutes before you jump into bed. And I'm brutally practical.
Speaker 12: You husbands will never make any impact on the world
Speaker 12: if you're not praying with your wives and leading your
Speaker 12: families spiritually.
Speaker 1: He just won't.
Speaker 12: It's not possible to develop a deep relationship within a
Speaker 12: family that is not triangular, that is, it doesn't include
Speaker 12: Jesus Christ at one corner. And we can seek to
Speaker 12: repent of these things and really begin to make time
Speaker 12: so that, in that sense we get to know God.
Speaker 12: I used to think that science and all of these
Speaker 12: arguments were much more interesting than the Bible. And I
Speaker 12: discussed it with my mentor, David Gooding, and he said,
Speaker 12: would you like to do a Bible study? And he
Speaker 12: invited me to do one one night transform my life
Speaker 12: completely in Cambridge where I for the very first time
Speaker 12: I met a person that took scripture seriously and he
Speaker 12: entered a dialogue with Matthew and it was just mind
Speaker 12: blowing how he began to open the treasures of scripture.
Speaker 12: But it takes input and work. Many of you people
Speaker 12: are professional. Think of the work you had to do
Speaker 12: to get to where you are now. If God has
Speaker 12: given you that kind of mind, how much of it
Speaker 12: are you.
Speaker 1: Using on him?
Speaker 12: And what worries me silly is people who rise in
Speaker 12: their professional career like that, but their knowledge of Scripture
Speaker 12: remains on a basic baby Sunday school level. So the
Speaker 12: moment their peers raise any questions, they instantly detect they've
Speaker 12: not thought it through, and that silences them often forever Saturn.
Speaker 12: So it's a clarion call, and I think it is
Speaker 12: a way of pushing against this tide of mediocrity where
Speaker 12: we don't take God's words seriously. So what that tells me,
Speaker 12: when I find it in my own heart, is I
Speaker 12: don't really love God. All this talk about going to
Speaker 12: heaven and going to make good Christ if that happened
Speaker 12: to you, now, what would you say to him?
Speaker 1: What would you talk about?
Speaker 13: It is very serious stuff. C. S.
Speaker 12: Lewis says, all the leaves of the New Testament Russell
Speaker 12: with an expectation of eternity. And have we never since
Speaker 12: that the Word of God is given to us to
Speaker 12: make eternal things real, and we need to spend time
Speaker 12: immersed in it, perfectly, reading it with other people and alone.
Speaker 12: I had a very close friend at Cambridge years ago.
Speaker 12: We agreed that whoever died first, the other remaining person
Speaker 12: would preach at the funeral.
Speaker 8: He thought I would.
Speaker 12: Die first because I was quite a bit older. But
Speaker 12: I'll never forget the day when he called me and
Speaker 12: with tears in his eyes, he said, I got a
Speaker 12: tumor as big as a grapefruit in here, and that's
Speaker 12: going to be it. You have to take my funeral.
Speaker 12: I said to him, what shall I say? Without hesitation
Speaker 12: said this? He said, tell them to do what we
Speaker 12: did as students in Cambridge, to pore over the word
Speaker 12: of God, prayerfully, and wait on God until his face appears,
Speaker 12: and then they will have something to say. Do you
Speaker 12: want something to say, your pastor teacher Sunday school, If
Speaker 12: you want something to say, there is no shortcut. And
Speaker 12: I'll never forget those essentially last words to the world
Speaker 12: that I've repeated them many times. That was what transformed me.
Speaker 12: It wasn't reading all the philosophy in the world, although
Speaker 12: I love it and find it interesting and it's a
Speaker 12: way of building bridges and.
Speaker 13: Dealing with difficulties.
Speaker 12: But in the end, unless God is real through his word,
Speaker 12: we're missing the central fellowship that he offers.
Speaker 13: Us in a world of deceit. Telling the truth is
Speaker 13: a revolutionary act. You're listening to the David Knight Show, All.
Speaker 1: Right, welcome back and joining us now is Tony Ardeman
Speaker 1: of Wise Wolf Gold, and Tony has kindly set up
Speaker 1: David Knight dot Gold. That'll take you directly to him
Speaker 1: and let him know that you're coming through us. And
Speaker 1: of course you can buy gold and silver from Tony
Speaker 1: and you can small or large amounts. You can also
Speaker 1: set up a regular savings program to start buying gold
Speaker 1: and silver. You can become part of the wolf Pack.
Speaker 1: Pick an amount that you want to He's got different
Speaker 1: levels there. You pick one of those levels and you
Speaker 1: you save that much each month and he sends that
Speaker 1: directly to and you get the advantage of a buying group,
Speaker 1: so he'll send that directly to you. A lot of
Speaker 1: a lot of experience with Tony over the years. A
Speaker 1: great guy to deal with. I highly recommend him. And
Speaker 1: we're going to talk a little bit about economics and
Speaker 1: things that are happening from the government and the outsized
Speaker 1: footprint of the government on us. Thanks for joining us, Tony.
Speaker 8: It's always great to be here, David. Thanks for having me. Yeah,
Speaker 8: economics or lack thereof, that's.
Speaker 1: Right, it's hard to call it economics, right anything, but well,
Speaker 1: of course they pretend that modern monetary theory is economics,
Speaker 1: but is not at all. And you know, this is
Speaker 1: one of these things. It's kind of interesting to see
Speaker 1: how much they lied to us last quarter about the
Speaker 1: jobs that were the new jobs that were created and
Speaker 1: zero head which is really excited because they called the
Speaker 1: lie when it was first put out by the government
Speaker 1: back in March. They called it almost to the dot.
Speaker 1: They said they've overinflated this by eight hundred thousand jobs.
Speaker 1: And now here we are a couple months later, they
Speaker 1: are getting ready to release the new figures. They revise
Speaker 1: the previous quarters figures and they say, we over reported
Speaker 1: that by eight hundred and eighteen thousand. Zero headside. See
Speaker 1: we told you eight hundred thousand. We almost kind of
Speaker 1: precisely the amount. But they do this every quarter, don't they, Tony.
Speaker 1: They'll always put out labor numbers and then that look
Speaker 1: better than they really are. In this particular case, this
Speaker 1: is the second biggest revision in US history. The other
Speaker 1: one happened in the midst of the Great Recession in
Speaker 1: two thousand and nine, so that tells us something as well.
Speaker 1: But they always put out these numbers that make everything
Speaker 1: look really good, and then the next quarter they revise
Speaker 1: those down to make this quarter's numbers look even better.
Speaker 1: As they're lying to us about this order's numbers as well.
Speaker 8: Well, that's right. They always do that, and it's the
Speaker 8: mockingbird press is the same thing with headlines and then
Speaker 8: they get it wrong and then they'll bury it with
Speaker 8: a retraction. But these numbers support the fake markets. That's
Speaker 8: why they're used and abused like this, and they throw
Speaker 8: these things out there. They'll use that to borrow against
Speaker 8: or put futures on something or short something else. So
Speaker 8: it's really it's not even about the truth.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact.
Speaker 8: It always reminded me when I saw that report come out.
Speaker 8: Do you remember during the height of the Biden mandates
Speaker 8: for Operation Warp Speed, when all these corporations were laying
Speaker 8: people off for not getting the jab and they came out,
Speaker 8: I think about two months later and said, look, millions
Speaker 8: of jobs have been created, and almost no one got
Speaker 8: the correlation. I thought, you're watching these same people that
Speaker 8: told these corporations you got to lay these people off.
Speaker 8: This is mandatory. So they were laying people off and
Speaker 8: there was millions of job openings. They said, look at
Speaker 8: all the jobs we created. You know, you fired people,
Speaker 8: and that they used that those statistics to show that
Speaker 8: they had a strong economy that's how fake it is.
Speaker 1: Oh, it just it never ends. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: they said, you know, back in two thousand and nine,
Speaker 1: it was just barely bigger than this lie there. They
Speaker 1: said it was eight hundred and twenty four thousand jobs
Speaker 1: that didn't exist, and they had to walk it back
Speaker 1: and they said, this time, it's eight hundred and eighteen thousand.
Speaker 1: So it was almost exactly the same. And of course
Speaker 1: that was with Obama. And you know it was Obama
Speaker 1: who famously said, you know, we had this many jobs
Speaker 1: created or saved, and everybody said or saved? What does
Speaker 1: that mean? Can you measure the jobs that you've saved?
Speaker 1: They're just making everything up, are they.
Speaker 8: It's totally all made up, all the numbers.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean we're waiting for it.
Speaker 8: I mean it's it's really bizarre, David, if you if
Speaker 8: you boil it down, you know, the FED, the Federal
Speaker 8: Reserve has such influence on our economy. We all waiting
Speaker 8: to see what's going to happen with your own palate
Speaker 8: Jackson hole. But if you really stop and think about it,
Speaker 8: take all the hype out of it. You're just waiting
Speaker 8: to tell it for a bankster to tell you when
Speaker 8: they're going to have more inflation. That that's what the
Speaker 8: markets are cheering for. These three rate cuts that are
Speaker 8: supposed to be announced here at Jackson Hole and is
Speaker 8: supposed to be I think October, November, December rate cuts
Speaker 8: of twenty five basis points. But that what that is,
Speaker 8: ladies and gentlemen, that's inflation. They're going to create eight currency.
Speaker 8: They're going to devalue your currency in the markets and
Speaker 8: the establishment are cheering that on.
Speaker 1: Now you're talking about how they manipulate the economy. That
Speaker 1: was one of the points of the zero Hyde article.
Speaker 1: They said, well, how would the stock market be different
Speaker 1: today if back in March five months ago they would
Speaker 1: have told you the truth about the jobs Actually, you know,
Speaker 1: a million less jobs created, the stock market would have
Speaker 1: been much different than it is right now. So that's
Speaker 1: one way they can manipulated. I remember a friend of
Speaker 1: mine who we had a party at our house, and
Speaker 1: he came over and his brother was visiting him and
Speaker 1: came and he introduced me to his brother, and who
Speaker 1: was a vice president at a bank, which is typically
Speaker 1: the title that you've got if you're a branch manager,
Speaker 1: they call you a vice president. And he says, so,
Speaker 1: my brother is in banking. He says, you got it
Speaker 1: all wrong about the Federal Reserve. He says, tell him.
Speaker 1: He goes, yeah, the Federal Reserve doesn't do anything except
Speaker 1: clear checks. I said, seriously, it doesn't manipulate the economy
Speaker 1: with the information that it puts out, or with the
Speaker 1: interest rates, with quantitative easy. You know, just he didn't
Speaker 1: know that stuff. I mean, I didn't argue with him.
Speaker 1: He says, oh, okay, well, I guess I was wrong.
Speaker 1: It is so easy for them to manipulate the economy
Speaker 1: one way or the other. And that was some of
Speaker 1: the things that were being said by the senators who
Speaker 1: opposed the creation of the Federal Reserve back in nineteen thirteen,
Speaker 1: saying that it's going to be able to manipulate and
Speaker 1: create boom and bus cycles. It can put out false information,
Speaker 1: they can trade on that and make money. I mean,
Speaker 1: I wonder if Nancy Pelosi made some stock moves when
Speaker 1: the Federal Reserve was lying. But I'm sure that the
Speaker 1: people inside the Federal Reserve who knew better, and the
Speaker 1: people inside the Department of Labor who knew better putting
Speaker 1: out these false job reports. I'm sure they all knew
Speaker 1: that tradeing on it.
Speaker 8: It's amazing how many people in the banking industry don't
Speaker 8: know about the origins of the Federal Reserve, what the
Speaker 8: Federal Reserve actually does and controls the money supply. I've
Speaker 8: had bank presidents do business with me, and usually they're
Speaker 8: just selling to me, they're not buying from me. And
Speaker 8: that's another interesting thing. Like people in the establishment banking order,
Speaker 8: they're just getting rid of stuff like oh, I got
Speaker 8: this these silver dollars, you know, this is something the
Speaker 8: banks had for a while, or I got this goal
Speaker 8: that I inherited to getting rid of it. And then
Speaker 8: I'll say what do you do and they'll tell them
Speaker 8: to be And this has happened to me more than once.
Speaker 8: And I'll start talking them about this about CBDC. They
Speaker 8: don't know about that. They don't know, they don't know
Speaker 8: about it. Well, they might know now it's it's become
Speaker 8: more headline. But this has been over the last few years.
Speaker 8: I run into those people all the time. You were
Speaker 8: mentioning the nineties and New Gingridge earlier in the show,
Speaker 8: and it reminded me of conversations I had with my
Speaker 8: dad at the time we were talking about the stock
Speaker 8: market right before the dot com bust, and he started
Speaker 8: talking to me about how the stock market actually works,
Speaker 8: and you know, about how his business would be compared
Speaker 8: to the stock market because he had convenience stores, in
Speaker 8: real estate and did some banking. And he said, if
Speaker 8: my business was valued at a thousand times earnings, it
Speaker 8: being the billions. So look, and he was telling me,
Speaker 8: he's like, look, this is how these these businesses are
Speaker 8: measured on Wall Street. He's I don't have nothing in stocks.
Speaker 8: So I've always learned from my day. I don't I
Speaker 8: don't get into the stock market. I don't buy paper.
Speaker 8: I invest in things that I can control and I
Speaker 8: can see. So I learned that lesson early on. And
Speaker 8: these you know, these statistics and all this stuff that
Speaker 8: comes out from the labor it's really irrelevant because so
Speaker 8: much of the so much of the business that goes
Speaker 8: on in Wall Street. It's hard to determine what is
Speaker 8: actually real. You're talking about again, thousand times earnings for valuations.
Speaker 8: This is nuts, you know, and they've been doing this
Speaker 8: for and it's worse now. I think a lot of
Speaker 8: the companies in the nineties were a lot stronger, especially
Speaker 8: after the eight debacle. You still have hundreds of zombie
Speaker 8: corporations literally little zombies. They should have died in eighth nine,
Speaker 8: but they're propped up because of all the financial infrastructure
Speaker 8: that flows through them. For the banks that they chose
Speaker 8: to keep around, you know, the ones that were too
Speaker 8: big to fail, not like Leman Right and Leman Leman
Speaker 8: and some of the others that were on the chopping block.
Speaker 8: And I think there was something I laughed about years ago.
Speaker 8: There was people say, well, the banking industry is too
Speaker 8: big to fail. I go, well, some of them. Some
Speaker 8: of them failed because there was you know, I remember
Speaker 8: there's an old Washington mutual that got turned into a
Speaker 8: chicken joint there in North Texas where I used to.
Speaker 1: Live well for several years. After they created this, you know,
Speaker 1: it was Dodd Frank, I think Barney Frank the Dodd
Speaker 1: Frank Bill, but it was also Elizabeth Warren who got
Speaker 1: involved in it. They created the Consumer Financial Protection Board,
Speaker 1: and after that that made it even more difficult for
Speaker 1: the small and medium sized banks. And I remember Drudge
Speaker 1: before he went to the dark side, he was talking
Speaker 1: about every year, you know, several hundred banks he would
Speaker 1: at the end of the year, he'd talk about how
Speaker 1: many banks had He had linked to an article about
Speaker 1: how many banks had gone out of business that year.
Speaker 1: Of course, not the big banks. It was all small
Speaker 1: and medium sized banks. And for the most part, they
Speaker 1: were regulated out of a lot of these businesses and
Speaker 1: then pushed into commercial real estate where they could make alone.
Speaker 1: And now they're going to be slammed with that. It
Speaker 1: truly is amazing to see how this whole thing has
Speaker 1: rolled out. I thought it was also interesting that Nicole Shanahan,
Speaker 1: you know, the running mate of RFK Junior, was talking
Speaker 1: about that this week, talking about how they fake every quarter,
Speaker 1: how they fake the labor statistics. But of course everything
Speaker 1: is faked. I used to always use the labor jobs
Speaker 1: reports as another example of how the government lies to us.
Speaker 1: When I was talking about all the COVID cases, I said,
Speaker 1: everything they tell you is a lie. You can't depend
Speaker 1: on any of it. And yet the stock market is
Speaker 1: such a bubble, and so much of the bubble has
Speaker 1: been poured into these AI companies, the Magnificent seven or whatever,
Speaker 1: and especially around AI, and that you talk about something
Speaker 1: that is trading at unbelievable multiples of what it's actually worth.
Speaker 1: That is the big bubble right now. It's going to
Speaker 1: be the a high bubble. It's going to burst.
Speaker 8: Absolutely, yeah, it's all a bubble.
Speaker 1: I mean.
Speaker 8: In the news, what's so interesting is these headlines coming
Speaker 8: out about Jackson Hole, the rate cuts, what's happening with
Speaker 8: the markets, that's a distraction. The actual news is what's
Speaker 8: happening between countries like Saudi Arabia, China, Russia, Iran, what's
Speaker 8: happening in energy Venezuela looking to adjoin the bricks or
Speaker 8: their financial networks. If you, if you're paying attention, you
Speaker 8: see what happened to the petro dollar, which was not
Speaker 8: on the mainstream radar. It is fat, it's approaching fast,
Speaker 8: the downfall and decline de dollarization of the world's reserve currency,
Speaker 8: also known as the dollar. We're losing the petro dollar system,
Speaker 8: we lost the agreement, and eighty percent of all the
Speaker 8: energy transactions that go on around the world, when involved
Speaker 8: in crude oil, are done in dollars. These countries that
Speaker 8: are brokering deals right now for cross border payments, countries
Speaker 8: like China, countries like Saudi Arabia, they're doing it now.
Speaker 8: Of course, Saudi Arabia joined bricks, so it's not going
Speaker 8: to be tomorrow. But that's the headline. And what you
Speaker 8: should be paying attention to is not the rate cuts,
Speaker 8: and it's not it's definitely not the stock market. And
Speaker 8: here in the US, it's not Walls Street. It's what's
Speaker 8: happening with our currency, because all of that will get
Speaker 8: all those dollars will be repatriated. You know, the Chinese
Speaker 8: are selling off US deet, they're buying gold. It's debatable
Speaker 8: how much gold the Chinese actually have. As a matter
Speaker 8: of fact, they're former province and maybe future province Taiwan.
Speaker 8: They just announced they're going to be doing a goal
Speaker 8: back currency with their gold reserve. They got about four
Speaker 8: hundred tons of gold. They started buying gold in the
Speaker 8: nineteen seventies and they're resetting their own currency and getting
Speaker 8: away from the dollar, even Taiwan. Yeah, and so this
Speaker 8: is happening around the world. That's the news. That's what
Speaker 8: to watch. Everything else is a distraction, and the clock's
Speaker 8: running out.
Speaker 1: And of course it's how incredibly suicidal and stupid our
Speaker 1: government is. Because you talked about how look, you know,
Speaker 1: moving oil and moving energy around and how we're losing
Speaker 1: the ability to do that with a pet dollar. We
Speaker 1: got a government doesn't care about the dollar, and it
Speaker 1: doesn't care about Petro, and it doesn't care about energy.
Speaker 1: It doesn't care about manufacturing therefore, and it doesn't care
Speaker 1: about us even being able to afford to heat and
Speaker 1: cool our homes, because it's just the utter contempt for
Speaker 1: energy that is shown by this government, and it's just
Speaker 1: part of that is reflected in their contempt and disregard
Speaker 1: for the Petro dollar. Who needs it, right, We're just
Speaker 1: going to manufacture what we need out of out of
Speaker 1: thin air. I think it is deliberate. I don't think
Speaker 1: it is stupidity. I think they're absolutely trying to sabotage
Speaker 1: this country in every way they can, especially when you
Speaker 1: look at the energy stuff. Now they're all jumping on
Speaker 1: the bandwagon of nuclear energy, but that's just going to
Speaker 1: make things more expensive. They want to ban what we have,
Speaker 1: shut down the plants that we've got, build something completely different,
Speaker 1: and it's going to mean that even if we get
Speaker 1: these things built and we don't have a shortfall, which
Speaker 1: I think we will, but even if we didn't, it's
Speaker 1: still going to put us at a disadvantage to China,
Speaker 1: who's going to be able to use cheap coal and
Speaker 1: other things like that, and they're building more and more
Speaker 1: coal plants. They can do as much as they want.
Speaker 1: That's what the Paris Climate of quarters About's about transferring
Speaker 1: the manufacturing there. So we're looking at some really hard
Speaker 1: economic times as they're throwing away both Petro and the
Speaker 1: dollar at the same time, with both fists as much
Speaker 1: as they can shove it out.
Speaker 8: Yeah, well, as Klaus Schwab said, they penetrated the cabinets
Speaker 8: World Economic Forum members all over the world. They penetrated
Speaker 8: the cab they certainly have, and of course before but hey,
Speaker 8: before you got their clauds, so we had the Council
Speaker 8: on Foreign Relations and of course the Trilateral Commission. All
Speaker 8: of these internationalists have infiltrated the United States government, and yeah,
Speaker 8: that's what they're bringing it down from the inside. They
Speaker 8: did nothing to stop the Petro dollar agreement that lapsed. Nothing,
Speaker 8: just stood by and watched it happen. And you're exactly
Speaker 8: right about I think this is a headfake. We'll build
Speaker 8: the new Leaner nuclear power plant.
Speaker 1: No, you won't.
Speaker 8: What you'll do is you'll just disable the grid in
Speaker 8: anticipation of just not having as much power or having
Speaker 8: rolling blackouts or having to you know, ration power. It's
Speaker 8: the same thing for the electric grid with the electric cars.
Speaker 8: As you know FOOTAGEES was called out on by Thomas
Speaker 8: Massey's you had the cars, it's twenty five refrigerators right
Speaker 8: to every household and they don't have the grid to
Speaker 8: support it. By all means, go get your electric car.
Speaker 8: It's about you not going anywhere. It's about you not
Speaker 8: having upward mobility, not being able to live in comfort,
Speaker 8: you know, taking down your quality of life. That's what
Speaker 8: this is. And again it's happening from the inside. You know,
Speaker 8: we do it ineratively, right, We do this running in
Speaker 8: that's right.
Speaker 1: And already you see in Texas as hot as it
Speaker 1: is right now, people are running their conditioning. We used
Speaker 1: to never have all of this nail biting and pearl
Speaker 1: clutching about it. Are we're going to have enough electricity
Speaker 1: to get through the summer, or we're going to have
Speaker 1: enough electricity to get through the winter, that type of thing.
Speaker 1: But they you know, when I went to Texas back
Speaker 1: in twenty twelve, they were dismantling cold power plants. At
Speaker 1: that time, it's like, this is crazy. They're not building
Speaker 1: anything new. They're just taking down what's already paid for,
Speaker 1: what already works, and what has the cheaper fuel. And
Speaker 1: as you point out, when they put in these nuclear
Speaker 1: power plants, it's just going to be for their ai.
Speaker 1: They're not going to have any capacity that they're going
Speaker 1: to put back into the grid, I don't think. And
Speaker 1: if they do, they're going to charge us an amazing
Speaker 1: amount of money. The same thing you see them doing
Speaker 1: with food and everything else. You're going to have to
Speaker 1: stop what you're doing and we're going to ban that,
Speaker 1: and then you're going to buy the new, brand new, shiny,
Speaker 1: expensive thing from us. You're talking about planned opso lescence.
Speaker 1: This is much worse than refrigerators and automobiles. This is
Speaker 1: about everything systemically, you know, across the board.
Speaker 8: That's right, and that's why I think they've opposed things
Speaker 8: like bitcoin so much. Because bitcoin relies on a cheap,
Speaker 8: innergy sufficient, cheap energy grid. It will move to where
Speaker 8: it can be cheap and where they can get that
Speaker 8: power easily, and it also helps innovate a lot of
Speaker 8: these bitcoin miners are taking old power plants and turn
Speaker 8: them around like old hydro electric plants, and turned them
Speaker 8: around and refitted them to do bitcoin mining. Those are
Speaker 8: innovations that you know, I guess that's why I support
Speaker 8: things like bitcoin especially because of that. Because energy. If
Speaker 8: you look at the worldwide map of the most prosperous countries,
Speaker 8: they use the most energy. There's a correlation between energy
Speaker 8: usage and of course energy supply and a sufficient grid
Speaker 8: and prosperity. And when you start taking that away, you
Speaker 8: become a third world country. Well that's exactly what that's
Speaker 8: being They're done to us. Yeah, and these things aren't
Speaker 8: even on the ballot, you know, for whatever this election
Speaker 8: is now, you know, it's.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the vital issues like that are not even being
Speaker 1: really discussed, not being discussed at all. You know. Trump
Speaker 1: will give a head fake nod to well, we need
Speaker 1: to have more energy and all this other kind of stuff.
Speaker 1: He left the Paris Climate Accord in the entire time
Speaker 1: and the you know, pretending that had been legitimately put
Speaker 1: in and it never was legitimately put in. But it's
Speaker 1: a Paris Climate Accord that says that China can build
Speaker 1: as many and as dirty power plants as they want.
Speaker 1: India as well, and that's what is causing the fundamental
Speaker 1: and ability of Western countries to be able to compete
Speaker 1: with Chinese goods. Now, that's one of the biggest new
Speaker 1: parts of the China price. You got factories in the
Speaker 1: UK being shut down because they can't compete, They can't
Speaker 1: make metal, they can't make anything that to compete with
Speaker 1: the Chinese because everything is energy wise is so expensive
Speaker 1: for manufacturing, because it's all energy intensive. They've been given
Speaker 1: that as a monopoly, if you will, and that is
Speaker 1: fundamental to making us poor and taking everything that we've got.
Speaker 1: It's not just even a the standard of living having energy,
Speaker 1: it's also about life expectance. So we used to always
Speaker 1: make that point when with a group that I was
Speaker 1: in about fifteen years ago. We tell people, you know,
Speaker 1: everybody knows can tell pretty easily that having cheap available
Speaker 1: energy is going to have a positive effect on your
Speaker 1: quality of life, but it's also going to have a
Speaker 1: big effect on how long you live. And you can
Speaker 1: show that from statistics around the world. Really it's right.
Speaker 8: And I was on a podcast yesterday and they asked
Speaker 8: me about Kamala Harris's financial plan or economic plan or whatever.
Speaker 1: Lack thereof whatever it is. Yeah, I mean it's.
Speaker 8: Straight up comming. I said, I said, what you're watching
Speaker 8: is the high Galian dialectic what you want, because they'll
Speaker 8: say this is what we want and it'll be outrageous
Speaker 8: and then then the Republicans will somewhat run against it,
Speaker 8: but their job is to get about halfway there and
Speaker 8: then preserve it. So the conservatives actually concerned, Like we've
Speaker 8: talked about this before, but that's really what that's the
Speaker 8: sad part about whatever this election is. None of those
Speaker 8: the Democrats you know in d Kamala Harris is putting
Speaker 8: forth and it's just out, you know, tax on unrealized gains,
Speaker 8: you know, like just taxing just your assets before you
Speaker 8: even move them, before there's an off ramp into anything.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 8: Putting a tax on that's that's just insanity.
Speaker 1: It's a wealth at tax. And that's about redistribution. And
Speaker 1: that's what her dad wrote a book on as an
Speaker 1: economics professor. Redistributional how do you do that? You come
Speaker 1: after wealth? And it's the Biden administration, which is just
Speaker 1: going to carry over into LA Law, wants to raise
Speaker 1: an additional four point three trillion dollars over ten years, and,
Speaker 1: as zero Hedge said, in the worst possible ways, imposing
Speaker 1: minimum taxes of twenty five percent and then starting to
Speaker 1: tax stuff that people have not sold. You don't know
Speaker 1: if it's a gaining, you don't know if it's a loss.
Speaker 1: And they're so they're going to start taxing that. And
Speaker 1: of course it'll only before the super rich tony because
Speaker 1: they'll never bother the middle class. Except that's the way
Speaker 1: it always works, right, just like, yeah, they just like
Speaker 1: the income tax. It was only going to be for
Speaker 1: the super rich, and so they should be taxed because
Speaker 1: you know, that's part of the basis of socialism and
Speaker 1: communism is envy. You don't look at this and say,
Speaker 1: you know, one day, I remember reading my dad's BusinessWeek
Speaker 1: when I was in high school, and there was a
Speaker 1: guy who was talking about he was in Europe and
Speaker 1: they were talking about what they called eurosclerosis, another fact
Speaker 1: that European economy could not grow. And the guy says, well,
Speaker 1: you know it's because this ingrained socialism and envy. That's there.
Speaker 1: He said, if you have a nice car in France,
Speaker 1: for example, you have to worry about somebody just coming
Speaker 1: along and keying it because they don't like it. They
Speaker 1: resent it, they hate it. But he says, if you
Speaker 1: have a nice car in America, people will look at it,
Speaker 1: I take pictures of it or whatever. It's something really extravagant,
Speaker 1: and they might kind of think, well, maybe someday I
Speaker 1: can have something like that, you know. It says that's
Speaker 1: a difference between America and Europe. Well, that's the difference
Speaker 1: really between well, we a free market and this envy
Speaker 1: of socialism and communism. It's about taking everybody down to
Speaker 1: the least comedy nominator based on envy and hatred, not
Speaker 1: on excreation.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 8: Well, the first they use, you know, through cultural Marxism.
Speaker 8: They went after us on on race lines to try
Speaker 8: to break up our culture. And now that they've taken
Speaker 8: away the free market for so long and their wealth
Speaker 8: disparity is so vast, you're going to start seeing that
Speaker 8: class envy again. You're going to start seeing it's so
Speaker 8: hard to talk to these young entrepreneurs that to even
Speaker 8: start a business today with all the regulations, especially crossing
Speaker 8: state lines, if you've got something that you're shipping out,
Speaker 8: it can get really really complicated and costly and stressful.
Speaker 8: And it makes you not even want to attempt anything.
Speaker 8: But these large corporations, and I wish I could talk
Speaker 8: to I don't know if you can even get through
Speaker 8: to the left or whatever operation system they're on in
Speaker 8: their mind, but I'd like to say, all of the
Speaker 8: things that you're supporting. You think you're taxing the rich,
Speaker 8: eat the rich, all this, the rich are supporting those
Speaker 8: candidates like the richest people. If they were worried about
Speaker 8: themselves getting taxed or losing their well they're not. They've
Speaker 8: already offshort everything. They have loopholes and foundations and trust
Speaker 8: that you'll never be able to penetrate. But they don't care.
Speaker 8: They want to make sure that you don't compete with them.
Speaker 8: That they're using envy against you. Yes, I wish I
Speaker 8: could talk to them instead of us having an open
Speaker 8: playing field and allowing the best in a meritocracy to
Speaker 8: work again here in this country, which would be wonderful
Speaker 8: because in America has such a great spirit. There's lots
Speaker 8: of young entrepreneurs out there. I see them all the
Speaker 8: time on social media. They want to make it, they
Speaker 8: want to build something, and my heart's with them. And
Speaker 8: this is hard work. Whether you're doing it, whether you're
Speaker 8: doing your own show, whether you're having your own business
Speaker 8: or you've got a couple of shops, it doesn't matter.
Speaker 8: It's all hard work. It can be worth it. I
Speaker 8: guess at the end of the day, we like to
Speaker 8: do what we do. But they're making it harder on us,
Speaker 8: for sure, and they want to create that ubi, that
Speaker 8: whole I think culture of the universal basic income of
Speaker 8: just giving up, which is really satanic.
Speaker 1: Yes, And I think it used to.
Speaker 13: Be a book.
Speaker 1: And it's just like the interview I had yesterday with
Speaker 1: the lady who had She and her husband had a
Speaker 1: business for thirty years and then the lockdown came along,
Speaker 1: and Tim Waltz came along right and after they've been
Speaker 1: lockdown for quite some time, they said, well, it's it.
Speaker 1: We're going to lose everything if we don't open up again.
Speaker 1: And you know, so there was about there was only
Speaker 1: about two hundred businesses in the state they were going
Speaker 1: to open up in defiance of it, and ninety five
Speaker 1: percent of them caved to the first letter from the state.
Speaker 1: So they didn't stand together. They hung separately, and they
Speaker 1: actually sent her to jail over this stuff. And that's
Speaker 1: what they wanted to do. They went to take the
Speaker 1: hardest working people who had set up a business, typically
Speaker 1: in the service economy, and destroy their life and then
Speaker 1: offer people universal base income. Well, here's a little, small,
Speaker 1: little handdown, and do we talk about basic That's what
Speaker 1: these stimulus checks were. But we're gonna put everybody on unemployment.
Speaker 1: We'll give you some stimulus checks and some other things,
Speaker 1: but we're not going to allow you to work, not
Speaker 1: at all, and we'll punish you. We'll even put you
Speaker 1: in jail if you open up and work. That's the
Speaker 1: thing that is so disgusting about it. And that was bipartisan. Oh,
Speaker 1: absolutely wise.
Speaker 8: Yeah, and it's really sad to watch the cult around
Speaker 8: our politics now.
Speaker 1: I just tuned out because people can't even hear.
Speaker 8: I remember being at the bitcoin conference and one of
Speaker 8: the speakers brought up things that Trump had said in
Speaker 8: the past about bitcoin, and I was with my son,
Speaker 8: my son Houston, and the crowd started booing, and then
Speaker 8: we realized. Houston turned to me and said, I think
Speaker 8: that they're booing not because of what Trump said, but
Speaker 8: because the guy brought it up.
Speaker 1: Yes, that's right.
Speaker 8: That's when I knew. I'm like, wow, I am in
Speaker 8: the thick of things. Even at the Bitcoin conference, you
Speaker 8: could hear that's where we are in our apolitic The
Speaker 8: partisanship is where logic goes to die. That's right, And
Speaker 8: that's where where as broadcasters, you and I are both
Speaker 8: in this thing, and I'm just looking around going, wow,
Speaker 8: this is insane.
Speaker 1: And when you look at what they did and you
Speaker 1: tell people this, and you hear it over and over again,
Speaker 1: well it was it wasn't Trump. It was the bad
Speaker 1: Democrat governors. They won't even give credit to the bad
Speaker 1: Republican governors like Dwine and Brad luttelan on and on.
Speaker 1: You know, It's just it drives me crazy. I've heard
Speaker 1: that so many times. It just I'm starting to have
Speaker 1: a really quick reflex reaction of that, which is not good.
Speaker 1: When I hear that excuse, it wasn't it wasn't Trump,
Speaker 1: and it wasn't the Republican governors. It was only the
Speaker 1: Democrat governors. It's like, man, I don't know.
Speaker 8: We have very unseerious people for serious times, yeah, very
Speaker 8: unserious leaders, and then really a lot of unseerious people
Speaker 8: involved in the in the political process because you won't
Speaker 8: really take a look into the behaviors and the decisions
Speaker 8: made by these politicians over the last four years, where
Speaker 8: they stood. Did they lock you down, did they mask
Speaker 8: you up? You know, you look at Texas busting those
Speaker 8: illegal aliens up to Martha's vineyard, those kind of political stunts,
Speaker 8: but not closing the border.
Speaker 1: That's what I pay attention to, right, That's right, Yeah,
Speaker 1: that doesn't help anything at all. I mean, those people,
Speaker 1: you're gonna spend the money to send them somewhere else
Speaker 1: in the United say it's are going to come back
Speaker 1: if they want. It's absolutely insane. You're not going to
Speaker 1: protect the borders, which you're going to do a stunt
Speaker 1: like that, You're absolutely right, un Rumble Atomic Dog says
Speaker 1: high Tony. Precious metals are way down today. Have you
Speaker 1: heard about the increased demand on silver with Samsung's new
Speaker 1: silver battery for evs here demand will be more than
Speaker 1: current world production. I'd not heard of that. Have you
Speaker 1: heard of that?
Speaker 8: I've heard of that battery, and I'll also add that,
Speaker 8: I mean, silver's so cheap compared to reality, even regardless
Speaker 8: of the EV batteries or solar or what the demand is.
Speaker 8: There was a two hundred million ounce deficit last year.
Speaker 8: The year before that it was one hundred eighty million,
Speaker 8: So they have to take from the above ground already
Speaker 8: produced supply of silver just to meet the needs. So
Speaker 8: two hundred million ounce and it's growing. There's not enough
Speaker 8: mining going on. Matter of fact, most most I think
Speaker 8: it's like seventy percent of all this new silver added
Speaker 8: to the inventories comes from mining of other metals, whether
Speaker 8: it's copper or gold, or zinc or something else. So
Speaker 8: they're pulling that out as just like an ancillary side show.
Speaker 8: It's not even they're not even going and directly looking
Speaker 8: for silver. So no, the silver markets are completely skewed.
Speaker 8: We learned that in the nineteen seventies with the Hunt
Speaker 8: family and their empire being taken out by the deep state,
Speaker 8: in my opinion, because of they're exposing the weakness of
Speaker 8: the dollar in the late seventies going into nineteen eighty
Speaker 8: with silver at fifty two dollars and fifty cents an ounce.
Speaker 8: I was listening to a podcast yesterday. They talked about
Speaker 8: gold at the end of the seventies, you know, thirty
Speaker 8: five dollars an ounce in nineteen seventy one, it's nineteen
Speaker 8: eighty eight hundred and fifty dollars an ounce of gold.
Speaker 8: Now it sounds like, wow, gold's gone up eight hundred
Speaker 8: and fifty dollars in nineteen eighty David, Yeah, I mean
Speaker 8: that's way more than twenty five hundred day by a
Speaker 8: long shot. And so we're not even We're not even
Speaker 8: at the beginning of the revaluation of these commodities, folks,
Speaker 8: Because I did I dig into this every single day
Speaker 8: I have I go into like different pay sites of
Speaker 8: Intel and what's happening in commodities around the world, and
Speaker 8: looking at graphs, we're not even close. If you look
Speaker 8: at the total financial market around the world, it's about
Speaker 8: four hundred and fifty trillion dollars. Gold has a sixteen
Speaker 8: trillion dollar market cap, Okay, I mean silver's got a
Speaker 8: one point four million dollar market a trillion dollar market cap,
Speaker 8: Bitcoin one point one trillion dollars. Again, it's four hundred
Speaker 8: and fifty trillion in so called assets around the world.
Speaker 8: Most of that's in fake fiat, A big portion that's
Speaker 8: in sovereign wealth funds and paper. So where does all
Speaker 8: that where all those funds go? I'm not saying gold's
Speaker 8: going to go to ten thousand dollars an ounce. But
Speaker 8: right we're not even close. You look at the damage
Speaker 8: done to the dollar over the last four plus years,
Speaker 8: which is that's when it really accelerated eighty percent of
Speaker 8: all the dollars ever created in the last forty eight
Speaker 8: to fifty months or so. So no, I mean, we're
Speaker 8: not even close to silver. Who knows what it is
Speaker 8: actually worth? Yeah, I don't know. I just know it's
Speaker 8: cheap right now. I was at the gold and silver
Speaker 8: trading floor on Friday, turning in some stuff in Dallas,
Speaker 8: and I walked out and got my car. I saw
Speaker 8: gold hit twenty five hundred dollars an ounce, and I thought, Wow,
Speaker 8: what a time to be alive this is And it didn't.
Speaker 8: It really doesn't make the headlines that it should. And
Speaker 8: the big story is not gold going up. The big
Speaker 8: story is these fiat currencies went you know, in denominated
Speaker 8: against gold, are going down.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's the story. Here's a good example of that.
Speaker 1: This is off of Kidko gold price supported. This is
Speaker 1: three days ago. The nineteenth gold price is supported at
Speaker 1: twenty five hundred dollars an ounce. As the US dollar
Speaker 1: drops two percent this month, and that was on the
Speaker 1: nineteenth of August. So already, you know, you're like three
Speaker 1: weeks through and it's down by two percent. The dollar
Speaker 1: is so as you're pointing out, it's a dollar that's
Speaker 1: dropping in value.
Speaker 8: Yeah, it's happening rapidly. I think it's happening faster. Well,
Speaker 8: let's just do a thought experiment in some of these elites. Okay,
Speaker 8: say that we never put sanctions on Russia, Say we
Speaker 8: didn't go Russia into invading Ukraine, but just take that
Speaker 8: off the table, say there's no sanctions. Is gold at
Speaker 8: twenty five hundred dollars an ounce? Say we didn't do
Speaker 8: the massive trillions and trillions of money printing through COVID
Speaker 8: nineteen eighty four or the lockdowns. Is gold at twenty
Speaker 8: five hundred dollars an hour? You could start going through,
Speaker 8: say about the rate cuts, you know, all the rate did,
Speaker 8: if we if we didn't do all the rate cuts
Speaker 8: that we did, would gold twenty five hundred dollars an ounce? Again,
Speaker 8: the gold's at twenty five hundred because of the damage
Speaker 8: done to the doll Yeah, because gold, somehow, people just
Speaker 8: you know, finally realize that gold's a great asset. That's
Speaker 8: not how any of this works. A matter of fact,
Speaker 8: the West in our markets aren't even what's driving gold.
Speaker 8: It's the foreign it's foreign nations and people in places
Speaker 8: like India and China and around the world. But it's
Speaker 8: not us. We're not Western. Even Western retail gold demand
Speaker 8: is not it's not up. So yeah, you're seeing people
Speaker 8: buy gold at Costco and stuff. You hear those headlines
Speaker 8: every once in a while, but really overall, it's not up.
Speaker 1: That's right. Yeah, Americans not really doing the saving. They're
Speaker 1: going further into debt. As a matter of fact, it's
Speaker 1: a point made by Radis bro on Rumble. Thank you,
Speaker 1: thank you for the tip. By the way, it says Americans,
Speaker 1: with the credit cards and their personal wealth creation, we're
Speaker 1: also contributing to inflation, which is never talked about. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Americans just want to keep putting it on the credit card.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's the whether there's the government or whether
Speaker 1: it's individual consumers. It's just like charge it, you know,
Speaker 1: and kick it down the road.
Speaker 8: Well, it's become very systemic inside our society. Unfortunately, we've
Speaker 8: borrowed from our children and our children's children for this
Speaker 8: particular present and it's not good.
Speaker 1: I mean, look at.
Speaker 8: Our foreign policy and what with the foreign aid and
Speaker 8: stuff that we've done. The damage we've done to our
Speaker 8: economy by just not taking care of our infrastructure and
Speaker 8: giving all of our funds away to places like Ukraine.
Speaker 8: I mean, it's unforgivable at some level. And I mean
Speaker 8: that's why you've got to become your own bank, folks.
Speaker 8: The government's not coming to save you financial institutions, bailouts,
Speaker 8: whatever that means to you, start investing in yourself, protecting yourself.
Speaker 1: Be your own bank. I agree. Yeah, And when you
Speaker 1: look at all this stuff about taxing capital gains, you
Speaker 1: haven't sold anything. As this one person points out, said, yeah,
Speaker 1: if you really wanted to address the problem of inequality
Speaker 1: and you know, and fairness and all the rest of
Speaker 1: this stuff, you would have focused on what happened during COVID,
Speaker 1: where they hand out to the public six hundred dollars.
Speaker 1: But he says, when I did the math during COVID,
Speaker 1: the total amount spent to bail the country out. When
Speaker 1: we decided to shut down the economy, it was just
Speaker 1: really shutting down Main Street. That's what they shut They
Speaker 1: didn't shut down the wall Street to shut down the
Speaker 1: economy and have the Federal Reserve replace it with a
Speaker 1: Fiat house of cards that amounted to something like seventeen thousand,
Speaker 1: five hundred dollars for every citizen of the United States.
Speaker 1: But we got those six hundred dollars Stumius checks. That's great.
Speaker 1: So they rob us for seventeen thousand and seventeen a
Speaker 1: half thousand, and they give us a small check. And
Speaker 1: that's what people don't even realize. And they're still cheering
Speaker 1: these people who did this to us. That's what's amazing
Speaker 1: to me.
Speaker 8: But yeah, we haven't quite felt the repercussions to the
Speaker 8: damage done. And I don't want them to happen. I
Speaker 8: love this country and the people in it. But there's
Speaker 8: going to be some hard times ahead and it'll I
Speaker 8: think it'll make nineteen twenty look like a picnic in
Speaker 8: my opinion, just given the sheer number of it. You know,
Speaker 8: I saw a tweet from Robert Kiyosaki earlier today and
Speaker 8: he said, does anybody know how long ago a trillion
Speaker 8: seconds was? It's almost thirty two thousand years ago. I mean,
Speaker 8: just the number trillion. We're throwing that around every hundred
Speaker 8: days we go a trillion dollars into debt. Again, it
Speaker 8: took us two hundred years to get there the first time.
Speaker 8: That's just where we are in this kind of these
Speaker 8: numbers are unsustainable and really, you know, it's fake and
Speaker 8: we know that, like it's fake money. We don't owe it,
Speaker 8: I guess because you could just you know again, you
Speaker 8: could just throw that out and just start over. But
Speaker 8: the problem is is the financial system that we're built on.
Speaker 8: It runs against the debt to the gross domestic product
Speaker 8: as far as the strength of the currency, and that
Speaker 8: our debt to GDP, it's like one hundred and forty percent.
Speaker 8: That's like running, you know, like we were at World
Speaker 8: War Two, except it's been going on that way for
Speaker 8: gosh decades. Yeah, and accelerating. So there has to be
Speaker 8: an endgame. Unfortunately, I think that the elite are going
Speaker 8: to do their golden parachutes. They're doing this controlled demolition
Speaker 8: of the dollar. You can see that they're not stopping it.
Speaker 8: I think they know where it's headed. They want to
Speaker 8: make the moves on their chess board. They don't. You're
Speaker 8: not supposed to know what's around the corner. You're supposed
Speaker 8: to pay attention to the politics and the personality and
Speaker 8: all that stuff, and it's your own detriment.
Speaker 1: That's right. Yeah, if you want a golden parachute, there's
Speaker 1: not too many options available to those of us in
Speaker 1: the middle class. You can start to build a golden
Speaker 1: parachute by accumulating gold and silver and getting out of
Speaker 1: that system. And you know, it's not even the economic
Speaker 1: stuff that we've talked about this entire time. It's also
Speaker 1: the surveillance and the you know, CBDC as you mentioned earlier.
Speaker 1: You know, we've just briefly talked about that. But it's
Speaker 1: that control grid that is what I want to escape,
Speaker 1: even as much, if not more so, than the inflation
Speaker 1: that is there. But I think it is going to
Speaker 1: be really really bad in these next four years. We're
Speaker 1: right at the tail end of this four turning and
Speaker 1: as you point out, everything is really accelerating. Tell us
Speaker 1: you got to your program is coming out following this one,
Speaker 1: Is that correct? Right after? Yes, sir, try to do
Speaker 1: every Thursday.
Speaker 8: Last week we couldn't do it because of the system
Speaker 8: that I had at the hotel was in Los Angeles
Speaker 8: for a podcast. But every Thursday following your interview, I
Speaker 8: do the Arderburn radio transmission on Rockfin and on my
Speaker 8: ex at Tony Ardburn. You can find me there. We
Speaker 8: do a live stream. It's an hour long, so if
Speaker 8: you're tuning in, please come find me.
Speaker 1: Sure, that'd be nice time. Anything else you want to
Speaker 1: tell us about what's going on at Why is wolf
Speaker 1: Anything else new?
Speaker 8: Well, just we're continuing to get supply and we're gaining
Speaker 8: new members, and I appreciate everybody who's joining Wolfpack. If
Speaker 8: you haven't looked at Wolfpack, go to Davidnight dot gold
Speaker 8: and just check that out. It's easy to join. It's
Speaker 8: we make it really easy. If you want to cancel, upgrade,
Speaker 8: whatever you want to do, we don't give you a
Speaker 8: run around. You can just email us or Texas or
Speaker 8: give us a call. I make it really easy for folks,
Speaker 8: and you can start stacking gold and silver littles fifty
Speaker 8: dollars a month. We got a kid's program at thirty five.
Speaker 8: The more people that join, the better off we are
Speaker 8: because I can do better buy ins. I got some
Speaker 8: really interesting products that I'm putting in this month and
Speaker 8: next month, and so we're already already planning that. So
Speaker 8: just appreciate all of your listeners, and of course we
Speaker 8: do any anything. There's no minimums that a wise wolf.
Speaker 8: I have the inverse of most gold and silver companies.
Speaker 8: I'm talking to real everyday people because I'm when I
Speaker 8: started this business, I'm not wealthy. You know again, I
Speaker 8: do fine. But you know, if I called one of
Speaker 8: these one eight hundred numbers, they'd be disappointed to what
Speaker 8: I had, you know, to give them. So yeah, anytime,
Speaker 8: anytime we can help. David Knight dot Gold and just
Speaker 8: to really appreciate your audience, thank.
Speaker 1: You so much, Tony, and we really do appreciate your helping. Again.
Speaker 1: Right after this program, you can find Tony on Rock
Speaker 1: fin and on Twitter or x I. I guess I'll
Speaker 1: always call it Twitter. I might as well, so stay
Speaker 1: frozen me. I'm going to freeze their name. Say frozen
Speaker 1: my followers. I'm going to freeze their name at Twitter
Speaker 1: because but thank you so much for joining us, Thank
Speaker 1: you for what you do to support the program. Tony. Uh,
Speaker 1: folks are gonna take a quick break and we'll be
Speaker 1: right back.
Speaker 13: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 1: And I want to thank on Rumble twelve June seventeen
Speaker 1: seventy six. Thank you for the tip, and he writes,
Speaker 1: moderation of content is no virtue. That's right, DK, the
Speaker 1: DK rumble channel one of the only free speech Rumble channels. Well,
Speaker 1: thank you, and folks, please wherever you're watching it, and
Speaker 1: if you're watching live, please like the stream wherever you're
Speaker 1: watching it. If you're listening to it recorded, please like
Speaker 1: it on Rumble or bit Shoot or Odyssey or any
Speaker 1: of the downloadable podcast things. That helps us with visibility
Speaker 1: very important for us, and it is you know, it's
Speaker 1: a real struggle to get past the censorship and the
Speaker 1: shadow banning. So that's something that really does help us
Speaker 1: a great deal. Let's talk a little bit about war.
Speaker 1: We have this attack and I haven't really talked a
Speaker 1: great deal about it, and part of it is very
Speaker 1: difficult to understand through the fog of war, what is
Speaker 1: really happening, Which way is momentum going. Is this something
Speaker 1: that is real or is it being hyped up by
Speaker 1: both sides. Everybody is lying about everything that's happening when
Speaker 1: it comes to war, for certain, and it's difficult for
Speaker 1: us to be able to tell what's going on. But
Speaker 1: this attack into the Kursk region by Ukraine into Russia.
Speaker 1: Everybody's talking about it, and one of the things that
Speaker 1: they're talking about is even the London Times. And I know,
Speaker 1: I had some British friends who said, it's not the
Speaker 1: London Times, it's the Times. Everybody else gets a qualifier,
Speaker 1: but not the original Times, they'd say. But anyway, the
Speaker 1: London Times was even talking about the fact that the
Speaker 1: UK had a big role in this. On August the sixth,
Speaker 1: the Ukrainian forces launched their largest attack on Russian territory,
Speaker 1: and the advance into the Kersk region was swiftly halted
Speaker 1: by the Russian military. Says RT. That's not what the
Speaker 1: other press is saying. They're saying that they're still there.
Speaker 1: They've actually made some gains. Of course, the Russians are
Speaker 1: saying that they halted them. But according to the article
Speaker 1: at the Times, the members of this formation are already
Speaker 1: specialist in street fighting and some of the bloodiest battles
Speaker 1: of the conflict. The Times reported a month before they
Speaker 1: were dispatched into Kersk, some of the unit were sent
Speaker 1: to England, where they underwent a few days of training
Speaker 1: alongside British soldiers. The major force of this training course
Speaker 1: was quote raids on high rise buildings. It reveal Western
Speaker 1: officials have celebrated in voice support for the Ukrainian incursion
Speaker 1: into Kersk, but they denied any prior knowledge of the
Speaker 1: operation or the involvement in it. However, a top advisor
Speaker 1: to Zelensky claimed earlier this week there were discussions between
Speaker 1: partner forces, just not on the public level. The advisor
Speaker 1: to Putin told is Vestia on Friday. Last Friday that
Speaker 1: Kev's incursion was planned with the involvement of NATO and
Speaker 1: Western special services. It was the US and its allies
Speaker 1: who put the junta at the head of Ukraine, while
Speaker 1: NATO countries have supplied keV with weapons, military instructors and
Speaker 1: continuous intelligence while controlling the actions of Neo Nazis. And
Speaker 1: so it's not at all that the US and the
Speaker 1: UK didn't know anything about it. It is credible, especially
Speaker 1: when the Times says it that they were actually behind
Speaker 1: this into what purpose. Well, there's a reason, as one
Speaker 1: author says, why the US is playing dumb about this.
Speaker 1: They would like for this to happen. As they look
Speaker 1: at it, they are extremely excited. When you look at
Speaker 1: Lindsey Graham, he can barely contain his enthusiasm.
Speaker 10: This way to deter China, I think is to get
Speaker 10: Ukraine right, And I just got back from Ukraine. I
Speaker 10: am in all of these people. We were told Key
Speaker 10: would fall in four days. Well two and a half
Speaker 10: years later, they're taking Russian territory. They're in Russia. They've
Speaker 10: taken half of what Putin seized from the initial invasion.
Speaker 10: And we need to pour it on and help these
Speaker 10: people when it comes to dealing with this Russian invasion
Speaker 10: to reset the world.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and so this was a move that was done
Speaker 1: to you know, it's kind of a gamble. We've identified
Speaker 1: through our surveillance's soft area if we could go in there,
Speaker 1: and you know, we're stymied over here, can't make a move,
Speaker 1: can't make any gains. So maybe we can jump into
Speaker 1: this area and tell everybody to give everybody that there's
Speaker 1: some hope, and so let's send some more tens of
Speaker 1: billions of dollars to Ukraine. White House Press Secretary Jeanpierre
Speaker 1: claimed that the US didn't know about Ukraine's plans to
Speaker 1: invade Kersk. Russia's Kursk unbelievable since there's no way that
Speaker 1: its intelligence services didn't catch even a hint of it,
Speaker 1: not to mention likely participation in the preparations. Question is
Speaker 1: why did in Russia catch a hint of it? And
Speaker 1: this is what a lot of them have said. They said,
Speaker 1: it just shows the weakness of Russia, that it is
Speaker 1: much weaker than people had thought, and so they're going
Speaker 1: to keep poking the bear until they get them as
Speaker 1: a dangerous cornered animal. That's the thing that is concerning. Certainly,
Speaker 1: we have seen that Russia was not very you know,
Speaker 1: on paper, it looked like they should have easily been
Speaker 1: able to crush Ukraine early on. They didn't. And now
Speaker 1: as they have started shipping more sophisticated weapons the American
Speaker 1: military jets and things like this and longer range missiles,
Speaker 1: the US and others have kind of laid back and
Speaker 1: allowed the Ukrainians to start using this and waiting to
Speaker 1: see after they cross one red line after the other,
Speaker 1: what's going to happen. And what is really concerning about
Speaker 1: this is that regardless of whether or not the whether
Speaker 1: or not Russia is weaker than anybody believed, what's dangerous
Speaker 1: about is that they're going to keep going until it
Speaker 1: is a again. They've painted them into a corner. And
Speaker 1: when you do that, you've got a very dangerous situation
Speaker 1: with a country that still has a lot of nuclear weapons.
Speaker 1: I just don't understand the people, the Lindsey Grahams of
Speaker 1: this world and all the rest of them who continue
Speaker 1: to push, push push. When Biden spoke and was given
Speaker 1: his final farewell address, what he had to say about
Speaker 1: the war.
Speaker 14: Well, you're not in Europe like it had been. You're
Speaker 14: nine for years. Yeah, yeah, fiddling in Sweden to NATO.
Speaker 14: Ten days before he died, Henry Kissinger called and said,
Speaker 14: not since, not since Napoleon, as Europe not looked over
Speaker 14: the shoulder a Russia with dread until now. Until now. Well,
Speaker 14: guess what Plutin thought he'd take keev In three days,
Speaker 14: three years later, Ukraine is still free.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I remember what I said about the Democrat Party,
Speaker 1: how they used to be war. You know now they're
Speaker 1: just for war, aren't they. You know they got that
Speaker 1: slogan forward again. And remember when people blocked off the
Speaker 1: d when Obama was using that they're just for war.
Speaker 1: Obama who added so many wars. I mean, by the
Speaker 1: time Obama left seven wars and Trump kept juggling them
Speaker 1: all and kept them all up in the air. It
Speaker 1: didn't stop a single one of them. But they want
Speaker 1: to just keep going. And where does it all stop.
Speaker 1: You know, there's a Biden with is angry, get off
Speaker 1: my lawn attitude about how we're going to take down Russia.
Speaker 1: These people, it's a murder suicide cult in Washington, truly
Speaker 1: a Satanic So five reasons why the US is playing
Speaker 1: dumb maintained plausible deniability for escalation, control, avoid embarrassment, and
Speaker 1: responsibility once Ukraine falls. This person says that it's inevitable
Speaker 1: that they will get them out of Russia. Well, we'll
Speaker 1: see what happens with it. Propagate the David versus Goliath
Speaker 1: optics to boost morale. They had to do something like
Speaker 1: this because everybody in the Western press was saying this
Speaker 1: is collapsing. Number four, keep up the charade of a
Speaker 1: gentleman's agreement gone bad, and then troll Russia after they
Speaker 1: previously denied supporting don Bass. So is this the beginning
Speaker 1: of the end for Ukraine, says another source, because Germany
Speaker 1: has put a ban on all new Ukrainian military aid,
Speaker 1: unlike America. You know, is it anything that we would
Speaker 1: ever do. You got our wonderful conservative Bible thumping Speaker
Speaker 1: of the House Mike Johnson, who said, why I don't
Speaker 1: want to have any Ukrainian more spinning. You know, before
Speaker 1: he became speaker, as soon as he become speakers like, Okay,
Speaker 1: we'll do Ukrainian spinning, but you're going to have to
Speaker 1: spend as much money at the border as you spend
Speaker 1: to Ukraine. That type of thing. And then after a
Speaker 1: couple of months he says, I forget about spending at
Speaker 1: the border. Let's just go to Ukraine. Let's just do
Speaker 1: exactly what Biden and the Democrats and the military industrial
Speaker 1: complex that put him in power. You talk about controlled opposition,
Speaker 1: Mike Johnson is exhibit A. And same thing is going
Speaker 1: to happen with Trump, all of the brave talk about
Speaker 1: all this stuff, Same thing is going to happen. However,
Speaker 1: in Germany it's a little bit different. And Germany has
Speaker 1: been a big part of the war effort for Ukraine.
Speaker 1: So on Thursday, in the aftermath of the Wall Street
Speaker 1: Journal report that was trying to move the narrative cover
Speaker 1: story about the nord Stream sabotage, which nobody believes. We're
Speaker 1: now supposed to believe that it was some rogue group
Speaker 1: of Ukrainians who did it, and they somehow managed to
Speaker 1: figure out how to get to the bottom of the
Speaker 1: ocean without any help from the people who could really
Speaker 1: do it. So they said, instead of the CIA being
Speaker 1: blamed for the explosion of the critical gas pipeline from
Speaker 1: Russia into Germany, they said, supposedly unnamed intelligence sources. This
Speaker 1: is what the Wall Street Journal wants you to believe.
Speaker 1: By the way, talk about mainstream media, Wall Street Journal
Speaker 1: is nothing but disinformation for the US government, they say,
Speaker 1: instead of it being unnamed intelligence sources who went rogue
Speaker 1: when Zelenski got cold feet, they said, they're responsible for
Speaker 1: coordinating the sabotage, using a handful of rank amateurs who
Speaker 1: somehow managed to sneak to the bottom of the Baltic
Speaker 1: Sea and conduct an unprecedented military operation. No matter the
Speaker 1: laughable veracity of the report, relations between Germany and Ukraine
Speaker 1: are about to turn ugly. And we asked, why is
Speaker 1: this story just coming out now, Well, it looks like
Speaker 1: relations between Germany and Ukraine are about to turn ugly,
Speaker 1: said Zero Hedge on August of fifteenth, and then you
Speaker 1: get this Wall Street journal report come out to try
Speaker 1: to control the narrative. German media reports this u turn
Speaker 1: in the narrative, which, according to some, meant that NATO
Speaker 1: should now unleash its full military power against Ukraine, which
Speaker 1: had single handedly attacked German assets by blowing up the
Speaker 1: Nord Stream. It was meant to soften the blow from
Speaker 1: Germany's decision to finally cut off Ukraine and Zelensky's unprecedented grift.
Speaker 1: They said, there's a moratorium in Germany on new assistants,
Speaker 1: and it's going to affect new requests for funding, not
Speaker 1: for previously approved aid, but the future funding would no
Speaker 1: longer come from Germany's federal budget, but from proceeds from
Speaker 1: frozen Russian assets. And since we already know that recent
Speaker 1: attempts to liquidate Russian assets crashed and burned over fears
Speaker 1: of escalating Russian retaliation, this effectively means no more aid
Speaker 1: for Ukraine. So is Biden telling you the truth? Is
Speaker 1: Russia no longer afraid? I mean, is Europe no longer
Speaker 1: afraid of Russia? As Henry Kissinger is allegedly said to Biden.
Speaker 1: And isn't it interesting? That Henry Kissinger is calling up
Speaker 1: the Democrat you know, Oh it's isn't he a Republican? Yeah,
Speaker 1: he's just a geo political shill. I tell you, when
Speaker 1: you look at this, the kind of things that we've
Speaker 1: seen in terms of coups and false flags and all
Speaker 1: the rest of stuff laid right at the feet of
Speaker 1: that war criminal, Henry Kissinger. I mean, still go back
Speaker 1: and take a look at Operation Gladio and Steve Pachinnick.
Speaker 1: Alex Jones is pal who was lying to everybody kicked
Speaker 1: off they stop the steel thing for January the sixth.
Speaker 1: It was Steve Pachinnick who had been a part of
Speaker 1: Operation Gladio, who the Italian government, the government said in
Speaker 1: their investigation had given the order to kill their kidnapped
Speaker 1: Italian Prime Minister Steve Pachennik, was sent there by Henry Kissinger.
Speaker 1: Always at the globalist Buildeberg confabs, every single one of them,
Speaker 1: Kissinger went to and so that's what this is. This
Speaker 1: is NATO, this is Buildeberg. These are the globalists. We
Speaker 1: are the globalist and many in the mainstream alternative media
Speaker 1: are the controlled opposition of the globalist as well. Berlin,
Speaker 1: which is Europe's main supplier of military aid to Ukraine,
Speaker 1: had previously signaled a change in course. Last month, the
Speaker 1: compromise detailed plans to slash future assistance to Ukraine by
Speaker 1: half to fulfill other spending priorities, and now it appears
Speaker 1: that even this token amount is going to be cut
Speaker 1: to zero. The G seven's decision to extend the fifty
Speaker 1: billion dollar loan to Ukraine backed by immobilized Russian assets,
Speaker 1: was the summit's most significant step forward. The loan structure
Speaker 1: reflex a typical compromise between the US and Europe. The
Speaker 1: US wanted to take all two hundred and eighty billion
Speaker 1: dollars of Russia's fords and assets. European countries, particularly France, Germany, Belgium,
Speaker 1: aggressively shied away from this, viewing it as too aggressive
Speaker 1: and fearing Russian reciprocation. So supposedly the Germans don't think
Speaker 1: that they're cowed down that much. Meanwhile, the primary source
Speaker 1: of funding for Ukraine, the Biden family and various deep
Speaker 1: state operatives, is about to dry out after Biden finally
Speaker 1: leaves the White House and quits politics forever in three months.
Speaker 1: That's according to zero Hedge and I think they've got
Speaker 1: that exactly wrong. Look, Biden isn't running anything, you know, Yeah,
Speaker 1: he's corrupt. They're connected with Ukraine and all the rest
Speaker 1: of the stuff. But whether or not Biden leaves, it's
Speaker 1: going to be the same people running La La, the communists,
Speaker 1: same exact people. Nothing is going to change. It's still
Speaker 1: going to be the military industrial complex, intelligence communities, all
Speaker 1: of these people who engineered the coup and the Obama administration,
Speaker 1: they're all still going to be there, whether it's Obama,
Speaker 1: Biden or Harris if it is her, and they're going
Speaker 1: to be running things if it's Trump as well. He
Speaker 1: didn't stop any of these wars at Obama. The Obama Group,
Speaker 1: let's just call it that way. The Obama group started. So.
Speaker 1: According to Politico, contentions over Ukraine reportedly deepened the rifts
Speaker 1: of the ruling coalition in Berlin. They are fighting amongst themselves.
Speaker 1: It's a very tenuous ruling coalition that they put together
Speaker 1: with several parties. And even as the pipelines were blown up,
Speaker 1: you had the alternative for Deutsch Lann, the alternative for Germany,
Speaker 1: the Rising Party that actually they call them populist parties
Speaker 1: because they actually want to do something for their own country.
Speaker 1: They were demanding that the pipeline be turned on, and
Speaker 1: they blew up that pipeline before it was even turned on,
Speaker 1: and blew up the other pipeline that had been bringing
Speaker 1: gas into Germany. The intention of our leaders, all of
Speaker 1: these leaders who have so much disdain for populism, they
Speaker 1: actually have disdain for our own countries. They're doing everything
Speaker 1: that they can to sabotage our own countries, just like
Speaker 1: blowing up the pipeline. And there's no country that is
Speaker 1: more interested in sabotaging the West than the US government.
Speaker 1: And that's the way it is. We'll be right back.
Speaker 1: Stay with us.
Speaker 13: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: Well, folks, what is it that we can do if
Speaker 1: we don't get so focused on the federal politics. There's
Speaker 1: a lot of things that we can do at the
Speaker 1: local level, especially preparing, and there's many different things that
Speaker 1: you can do to prepare. As we've talked to Tony earlier.
Speaker 1: You know, you can start to set up some wealth
Speaker 1: protection with gold and silver. You can start to educate
Speaker 1: yourself about how to maintain your water supply, and many
Speaker 1: other things in emergency situation and do that with a
Speaker 1: civil defense manual. Dot com that Jack Lawson talked to
Speaker 1: last Friday has great information and advice on preparing for things.
Speaker 1: And there's another Patriot be Best, which can help to
Speaker 1: keep the natural food chain going in your area. Things
Speaker 1: that you can learn and understand about how to keep
Speaker 1: a natural food chain going as they're working as hard
Speaker 1: as they can to shut down our ability to produce
Speaker 1: even our own food. The good people at Patriot be
Speaker 1: Best have done extensive research and study about this important issue.
Speaker 1: They've created an educational online digest to help spread the
Speaker 1: word about the challenges facing the American bee and educating
Speaker 1: American patriots to engage as advocates, to inform others, and
Speaker 1: to band together to help solve this problem. Patriot be
Speaker 1: Best is a digital b sanctuary for education, engagement, and
Speaker 1: real change. These people know bees and Patriot be Best
Speaker 1: has laser focused on restoration and preservation of the American
Speaker 1: bee population. You can learn about how the honeybee benefits
Speaker 1: all of us, to discover be friendly initiatives, and many
Speaker 1: other helpful resources. You can subscribe at a worker bee
Speaker 1: level to the buzz get educational information advocacy opportunities and
Speaker 1: be friendly products, b rescue activities, many other things. If
Speaker 1: you go to the Queen Bee subscriber level, you'll get
Speaker 1: access to bonus content on patriotic topics related to restoring
Speaker 1: and reinforcing American values. Check them out at Patriotbebest dot
Speaker 1: com to subscribe and to see all the cool related
Speaker 1: be products they have to offer. It is the destination
Speaker 1: for all things American b And then check out the links.
Speaker 1: They have a link at why our American bee population
Speaker 1: is under attack. All of that is at Patriotbebest dot com. Well,
Speaker 1: let's take a look at what is not working. We
Speaker 1: have Nantucket residents are furious because as they put these
Speaker 1: offshore wind turbines, they are you know, they don't last
Speaker 1: for and the experiment says one resident gets an f minus.
Speaker 1: Residents are seeing broken wind turbine blade fragments all over
Speaker 1: the beach. What was this about biodegradable stuff and everything? Right?
Speaker 1: Do they ever care about that? Now? If you look
Speaker 1: at what has happened to the radical green agenda, it's
Speaker 1: not at all about cleaning things up. It's not at
Speaker 1: all about recycling, it's not at all about being natural.
Speaker 1: The great Nantucket experiment gets an F minus of the
Speaker 1: chairman of O'Leary Ventures to Bloomberg talking about the offshore
Speaker 1: turbine failures that have resulted in broken fiberglass littering the
Speaker 1: pristine beaches of Nantucket last month. So it's not a
Speaker 1: golden example of success in wind turbines, that's for sure.
Speaker 1: The federal government ordered Vineyard winds projects south of Nantucket
Speaker 1: last month the halt construction and electricity generation following the
Speaker 1: blade malfunction. The company managing the projected the turbine blade
Speaker 1: failure was due to quote, a manufacturing deviation. Boeing should
Speaker 1: try that excuse. Yeah, we just messed it up when
Speaker 1: we built it right. Manufacturing deviation Nantucket is merely a
Speaker 1: casualty of the Biden Harris Administration's push to greenify, as
Speaker 1: they put it, the US economy with unreliable wind and solar,
Speaker 1: the administration has pledged to develop thirty gigawatts of offshore
Speaker 1: wind by twenty thirty. Thirty jigawats Marty. There you go.
Speaker 1: So one account on Twitter that goes by the name
Speaker 1: of Bernie, it's not Bernie Sanders said net zero climate
Speaker 1: zelots are very quiet over a wind turbine the size
Speaker 1: of the Eiffel Tower collapsing near Nantucket. Also silent about
Speaker 1: the three hundred foot blade crashing to the ocean floor
Speaker 1: and sending shards of toxic fiberglass onto beaches and shorelines.
Speaker 1: Be quiet, they're saving the planet, he writes. Yeah, that's
Speaker 1: anything for this stuff. No amount of money is too expensive.
Speaker 1: None of the problems about what do we do with
Speaker 1: these blades when they inevitably have passed their lifetime or
Speaker 1: when they have a catastrophic failure like this. One Nantucket
Speaker 1: resident said, the green energy push offshore was jammed down
Speaker 1: our throats by the federal government, and we are not
Speaker 1: represented in this process. Always. This is what is always happening.
Speaker 1: All of this stuff is being jammed down our throats,
Speaker 1: and if it's offshore like that, there's not a great
Speaker 1: deal that we can do about it. But again, if
Speaker 1: you want to stop the federal government from jamming things
Speaker 1: down your throat, about the only option you've got is
Speaker 1: to get involved at the stay eight and local level. Constitutionally, legally,
Speaker 1: there are things that we can do, but we don't.
Speaker 1: We've got to have people who've got the backbone to
Speaker 1: do it green hydrogen subsidies are now nineteen hundred times
Speaker 1: larger than what is given to nuclear. Well again, what
Speaker 1: about fossil fuel. You know, when we look at all
Speaker 1: this stuff, it's the government that is picking the winners
Speaker 1: and the losers. Are they going to give more to
Speaker 1: hydrogen than they do to nuclear? Are they going to
Speaker 1: give more to soler than they do to gas or
Speaker 1: to oil? Why should they subsidize it at all? And
Speaker 1: yet what we see from the conservatives is wait a minute,
Speaker 1: I want my subsidy, and my subsidi is not as
Speaker 1: big as these other guys over here. That clip that
Speaker 1: I played for the other day when I did the
Speaker 1: at the Shrugged thing, you know, straight out of Ain Ran.
Speaker 1: The government picks which industries are going to succeed and
Speaker 1: which ones are going to fail, and how they do
Speaker 1: that well with their subsidies. It say, as long as
Speaker 1: we have subsidies of any sort, we have crony capitalism.
Speaker 1: We are not managing anything, We're not investing in anything.
Speaker 1: It is just the picking the winners and losers and
Speaker 1: who they're going to subsidize. The government should not be
Speaker 1: picking winners and losers. But this article from Robert Brice
Speaker 1: as hydrogen producers can get up to twenty five billion
Speaker 1: per each a and federal tax credits. That's nine times solar,
Speaker 1: forty seven times win, eighteen hundred times hydrocarbons, and so again,
Speaker 1: the real issue is not that they're picking the wrong
Speaker 1: winners and losers. They're giving money to their friends. The
Speaker 1: real issue is that we've got the federal government picking
Speaker 1: and micromanaging our economy. It ought to be whoever is
Speaker 1: the most efficient. But of course, in order to have
Speaker 1: that kind of system, you're going to have to expose
Speaker 1: the lies that are underlying all of this green agenda,
Speaker 1: just like you've got to expose the lies under lying
Speaker 1: the pandemic agenda. The late Charlie Munger of Berkshire Berkshire Hathaway,
Speaker 1: so show me the incentives and I'll show you the outcome.
Speaker 1: And so they would invest in the companies they knew
Speaker 1: who was going to win, because the government is picking
Speaker 1: it to incentivize it. Whenever you wonder why the US
Speaker 1: isn't building more nuclear plants and is instead lavishing hundreds
Speaker 1: of billions of dollars on politically popular forms of alternative energy,
Speaker 1: remember Monger's line. He says, well, again, you know, nuclear,
Speaker 1: every one of these has got his own issues, and
Speaker 1: it is the you know, there's none of these that
Speaker 1: are full proof, none of them are without their drawbacks.
Speaker 1: Quite frankly, you know, if we didn't have this issue
Speaker 1: of this fantasy chicken little alarmism about CO two again,
Speaker 1: zero point zero four percent of the atmosphere of CO two,
Speaker 1: only three percent of that. They even claim only three
Speaker 1: percent of it is man made. So it's clearly nonsense,
Speaker 1: especially when you look at people say, well, look at
Speaker 1: things are hotter. Now, Well, if we're having a hotter summer,
Speaker 1: just understand that we had an offshore volcano that increased
Speaker 1: the amount of water vapor by ten percent. You know,
Speaker 1: we're talking about trying to control CO two, which is
Speaker 1: zero point four percent of the atmosphere and only three
Speaker 1: percent of it man made. Well, the water is a
Speaker 1: thing that dominates the atmosphere. It is the key greenhouse
Speaker 1: gas and that dominant form. When you're not talking about
Speaker 1: something that is, you know, zero point zero four percent,
Speaker 1: we're talking about something that is the vast majority of
Speaker 1: it was increased by ten percent from that underwater volcano.
Speaker 1: And so if we don't attack the root cause of that,
Speaker 1: they're going to continue to reward their friends and to
Speaker 1: punish us with more and more expensive energy. The true
Speaker 1: cost of Biden's bet on battery electric vehicles. Two months
Speaker 1: into his presidency, Biden announced a two trillion dollar infrastructure
Speaker 1: plan that included one hundred and seventy four billion dollars
Speaker 1: in grants, subsidies, and other payouts to encourage Americans to
Speaker 1: switch to battery electric vehicles. And since that initial quote
Speaker 1: unquote investment, billions and billions more have been poured into
Speaker 1: white is increasingly a failing effort to convince or to
Speaker 1: control auto buyers to switch. These huge expenditures, together with
Speaker 1: COVID and war moneies, have ballooned the national debt to
Speaker 1: the point that seventy six percent of income taxes are
Speaker 1: needed just to pay interest on the day. The idea
Speaker 1: that government knows best is the fatal thing. And so
Speaker 1: you look at what they're doing for the climate, mcguffin,
Speaker 1: the COVID, mcguffin, the war, all the rest of this
Speaker 1: stuff was that all you had that all uput is
Speaker 1: it equal. It equals a crash. And people have seen
Speaker 1: now finally they've experienced the fatal flaws of the electric vehicles,
Speaker 1: and as they said in South Korea, the fire was
Speaker 1: so devastating that the South Korean people have pulled back.
Speaker 1: That's just one example of it. It's going to get
Speaker 1: worse with these battery energy storage sites that have to
Speaker 1: be there to back up the solar and the wind.
Speaker 1: You want to talk about a fire hazard this year,
Speaker 1: and we just had another big truck electric truck that
Speaker 1: caught electric semi truck. The concern is about the toxic
Speaker 1: gases that are there. See that's the issue. You look
Speaker 1: at CO two must be stopped, but nobody wants to
Speaker 1: talk about the gases that are released that are potentially
Speaker 1: fatal to humans from these electric fires that are so
Speaker 1: difficult to put out. So it is really getting the
Speaker 1: cart before the horse. We're going to take a quick
Speaker 1: break and we'll be right.
Speaker 13: Back defending the American dream. You are listening to the
Speaker 13: David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: Quick update on the DNC the dilation and curthage that
Speaker 1: is happening in Chicago, or I guess we could call
Speaker 1: it the Demonic Convention. They now have the FBI conducting
Speaker 1: an investigation to try to find out how maggots got
Speaker 1: into the DNC. Oh, I'm sorry how they got into
Speaker 1: the DNC breakfast there were we know how the maggots
Speaker 1: got in. They all jumped into politics. Now we're not
Speaker 1: talking about the human maggots there. We are talking about
Speaker 1: maggots in their food. About six forty five am, hotel
Speaker 1: guests discovered the nauseating protein packed topping. Yeah, exactly what
Speaker 1: is wrong with that? I thought they wanted to eat bugs. Well,
Speaker 1: here's an extra helping of bugs for you, maggots, requiring
Speaker 1: at least one person to be assessed by first responders
Speaker 1: actually ate a bug. We can confirm that a group
Speaker 1: of individuals caused a disruption at a DNC related breakfast
Speaker 1: event at our hotel this morning. Call the FBI. That's
Speaker 1: the refrain of the Democrats all the time, isn't it
Speaker 1: Calling the FBI and investigate this? And they again, I
Speaker 1: guess they needed a little bit more protein because the
Speaker 1: DNC has asked for vendors to prioritize low emission meets,
Speaker 1: low mission meets, so I guess you could say meets
Speaker 1: back on menu. Boys, But everybody looking around as to
Speaker 1: where the beef is while Babylon Bee says, oh, No,
Speaker 1: A man at the DNC, thinking that he was in
Speaker 1: line for a food truck accidentally gets a vasectomy. Wait,
Speaker 1: I just wanted to burrito. Yeah, these are the people
Speaker 1: that have an abortion van as a part of the
Speaker 1: things that they're looking for. Meanwhile, you've got evangelicals for
Speaker 1: Harris praising, a pro choice pastor for preaching that we're
Speaker 1: all God's children at the DNC. Wait a minute, for
Speaker 1: all God's children. Why are they trying to kill God's children?
Speaker 1: And why is this pastor supporting all of this? It
Speaker 1: absolutely makes no sense. And yet when you look at
Speaker 1: what is happening in our society. So at the beginning
Speaker 1: of the program we have as the statues and the
Speaker 1: monuments to American society and American history are coming down
Speaker 1: all over the place, being defaced by these same people,
Speaker 1: we now have new monuments coming up everywhere. And of course,
Speaker 1: one of these is a ninety foot statue being unveiled
Speaker 1: in Houston. And this is a statue to a ninety
Speaker 1: foot tall Henyman statue that was erected on August the
Speaker 1: eighteenth in Houston, Texas. The statue is named the Statue
Speaker 1: of Union, Now the third tallest statue in the United States.
Speaker 1: This is what it looks like. The statue stands as
Speaker 1: a tribute to Lord Henyman's role and reuniting Shri Rama
Speaker 1: and Sita. These are places that I don't even know
Speaker 1: about somewhere in India something about that. So you now
Speaker 1: have this Indian population in Houston that is erecting a
Speaker 1: giant ninety foot statue about this and the colossal figures
Speaker 1: located at the Shri Ashtalakshmi Temple in Sugarland, Texas. Sugar Land, Texas,
Speaker 1: that's where Karen and I loton and we we're there
Speaker 1: in nineteen eighty working for Texas Instruments. But we're not
Speaker 1: allowed to celebrate American heroes. I'm not sure that that's
Speaker 1: a real person. I'm thinking I didn't look this up.
Speaker 1: The Henyuman statue. This since this is part of a temple,
Speaker 1: it may be part of their a foreign country, a
Speaker 1: foreign religion. But it's okay. We just can't have any
Speaker 1: American statues. You can't put up statues either side of
Speaker 1: the Civil War. For example, the emphasize the significance of
Speaker 1: the statue and symbolizing the glory of Indian heritage and
Speaker 1: spiritual unity. See I think that said. I think there's
Speaker 1: suppose I think the shri rama and the Sita are
Speaker 1: two spiritual constructs that he's this other facial Look at
Speaker 1: the face. It's like a monkey face or something.
Speaker 7: Right.
Speaker 1: I don't know exactly what that is, but this is
Speaker 1: what's happening to our country. We need more immigrants, by
Speaker 1: the way. Controversial statue artist also in Houston. This is
Speaker 1: something that just happened with the as the hurricane was
Speaker 1: going through, we had something happened to this abortion statue.
Speaker 1: This is something that was put up at the University
Speaker 1: of Houston. This is a statue to celebrate abortion, a
Speaker 1: very weird pagan thing. It's a head with ram horns
Speaker 1: on it or Bohamett horns or something like that. The
Speaker 1: arms or spindly things like branches or something, and then
Speaker 1: around its neck it has a lace collar that is
Speaker 1: supposed to be reminiscent of Darth Vader Ginsburg. It was
Speaker 1: something that was done by an Indian sculptor who is
Speaker 1: a feminist, and they premiered this sculpture in New York
Speaker 1: to critical acclaim and then they put it down at
Speaker 1: the University of Houston back in March. There was a
Speaker 1: lot of protests you to see there stop the university
Speaker 1: satanic abortion statue as from Texas Right to Life. The
Speaker 1: artist is eighteen foot statue. They were going to have
Speaker 1: a ceremony there and the ceremony was stopped, but they
Speaker 1: still put the statue there. The statue, called Witness, stands
Speaker 1: tall next to the Cullen Family Plaza fountain at the
Speaker 1: center of the campus, and it is supposed to represent
Speaker 1: the fight for abortion rights. It quickly drew criticism from
Speaker 1: anti abortion organizations that collective ly urged the university to
Speaker 1: remove the statue from the campus. The American Society for
Speaker 1: the Defensive Tradition, Family and Property and also Students for
Speaker 1: Life of America turned out last week to object to
Speaker 1: the statue that protesters deemed ugly and satanic, is also
Speaker 1: opposed by Texas Right to Life. Thanks to enormous pressure
Speaker 1: from pro life organizations, the university removed the event entirely,
Speaker 1: but they kept the sculpture up. As the statue remained there,
Speaker 1: so did our need to speak to life again. On
Speaker 1: February twenty ninth, a nonprofit organization says that they're advocating
Speaker 1: a protection of free speech is saying, well, we need
Speaker 1: to have this statue in this celebration up. But again,
Speaker 1: are these the kind of people where they pro choice
Speaker 1: when it came to mask to jabs, that they defend
Speaker 1: free speech when people were pushing back against the lines
Speaker 1: of the pandemic. I don't think so, And I don't.
Speaker 8: Think advocating baby murder is covered under free speech.
Speaker 1: That's right, that's right. Well, actually it is just not.
Speaker 1: You can talk about baby murder and we should be
Speaker 1: able to oppose it. But there they sense for us,
Speaker 1: they should be stopped from murdering the babies. But I
Speaker 1: guess they can talk about advocate baby murder. We just
Speaker 1: remove you from society. Oh you said that, hmm, well
Speaker 1: maybe we take you out back. Yeah, well somebody did
Speaker 1: take the statue out back as the the hurricane came
Speaker 1: through a hurricane barrel. Somebody beheaded the statue and so
Speaker 1: it now looks a lot better, but it's still there.
Speaker 1: They won't remove it. And the person who put this together,
Speaker 1: Seconder is her last name, Shazia Secandar, said that she
Speaker 1: does not want it repaired. She wants to leave it there.
Speaker 1: As you know, an example of how hateful the people
Speaker 1: who want to save babies are so it has now
Speaker 1: been beheaded, but it is still there as a matter
Speaker 1: of fact. When this is being talked about back in
Speaker 1: February the seventh, the people who opposed it, they're the
Speaker 1: Texas Right to Life, they said. In terms of defining
Speaker 1: what this thing was, they said, written on the sculpture
Speaker 1: is the word Hava, which means Eve in Arabic and
Speaker 1: in Hebrew, which Secander celebrated. She said, yeah, it was
Speaker 1: to be about Eve. She said, Eve was the first lawbreaker.
Speaker 1: Right well as Texas Right to Life said, disobedience to
Speaker 1: God should not be esteemed by society, much less lauded
Speaker 1: with a statue on the con Art should reflect truth, goodness,
Speaker 1: and beauty, three timeless values that reveal the true nature
Speaker 1: of God. Art cannot have beauty without truth, and art
Speaker 1: cannot have truth without goodness. But of course, if you're
Speaker 1: in the Houston area, they will have a statue honoring
Speaker 1: child sacrifice. And I think the appropriate thing to do
Speaker 1: for the people who again want to dismember babies. Maybe
Speaker 1: next time there's an event that takes the power down,
Speaker 1: somebody will dismember another portion of that abortion honoring statue
Speaker 1: isn't it amazing? You know, we cannot honor people who
Speaker 1: of course, nobody is perfect. We put these statues up
Speaker 1: of honorable people like Robberty Lee, and they make a
Speaker 1: ritual out of decapitating that and burning the head. Remember
Speaker 1: when they did that. Yeah, I'm melting down the head
Speaker 1: for folks, I'm just being edgy.
Speaker 8: Don't actually commit any.
Speaker 1: Violence, that's right. Yeah, we're not encouraging any of that
Speaker 1: stuff of course. Right, Thank you for listening. Have a
Speaker 1: good day.
Speaker 15: Let me tell you the David Night Show you can
Speaker 15: listen to with your ears. You can even watch it
Speaker 15: by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me,
Speaker 15: that means you're listening to the David Night Show right now.
Speaker 16: Yeah, good job.
Speaker 15: And you want to know something else.
Speaker 16: You can find all the links to everywhere to watch
Speaker 16: or listen to the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com.
Speaker 1: That's a website.