WEBVTT

1
00:00:13.560 --> 00:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to the Confront of Christianity podcast and

2
00:00:16.039 --> 00:00:19.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm here with doctor Sharon Diricks. Sharon is a speaker

3
00:00:19.559 --> 00:00:22.079
<v Speaker 1>and author whose work focused on responding to the spiritual

4
00:00:22.440 --> 00:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and faith related questions that people ask today. She has

5
00:00:25.359 --> 00:00:28.199
<v Speaker 1>a PhD in brain imaging from the University of Cambridge

6
00:00:28.399 --> 00:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and today speaks regularly on topics such as science and theology,

7
00:00:31.760 --> 00:00:35.359
<v Speaker 1>human consciousness, the problem of evil and suffering. Sharon has

8
00:00:35.359 --> 00:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>appeared on local and national radio and has written for

9
00:00:38.159 --> 00:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>The Times, The London Times, that is for our American listeners.

10
00:00:41.679 --> 00:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>She is the author of Why Looking at God, Evil

11
00:00:44.280 --> 00:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and Personal Suffering? Am I Just My Brain? And most

12
00:00:48.280 --> 00:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>recently Broken Planet, released just last year. Sharon, thanks so

13
00:00:52.359 --> 00:00:55.079
<v Speaker 1>much for joining me. You and I got to meet

14
00:00:55.240 --> 00:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>exceedingly briefly in the street in Cambridge this past summer,

15
00:00:59.359 --> 00:01:01.719
<v Speaker 1>and it was it was lovely to kind of put

16
00:01:01.880 --> 00:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a body in a face to a name, because i'd

17
00:01:04.040 --> 00:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly you've been sort of on my railar for a while,

18
00:01:06.120 --> 00:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>but I hadn't been able to meet you in person.

19
00:01:09.319 --> 00:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Fun fact, for those who don't yet know Sharon, up

20
00:01:12.719 --> 00:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>familiar with her work. She has one of the most

21
00:01:15.680 --> 00:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>interestingly spelt last names I've ever come across, and she

22
00:01:21.280 --> 00:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>just now helped me figure out how to pronounce it. So, so, Sharon,

23
00:01:24.920 --> 00:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>your last name is spelled d I R c k X,

24
00:01:28.480 --> 00:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>which is just I love that so much. One one

25
00:01:33.120 --> 00:01:36.799
<v Speaker 1>sort of vowel. It's like the sort of scrabble word

26
00:01:36.840 --> 00:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>of choice.

27
00:01:38.120 --> 00:01:40.359
<v Speaker 2>It is in need of another vowel. And another fun

28
00:01:40.439 --> 00:01:42.519
<v Speaker 2>fact is that so my husband and I met in

29
00:01:42.560 --> 00:01:45.400
<v Speaker 2>a brain imaging lab, which makes us sound very nerdy,

30
00:01:45.840 --> 00:01:48.280
<v Speaker 2>but one of the first things I've said to him

31
00:01:48.280 --> 00:01:50.719
<v Speaker 2>when I saw his name was that he had too

32
00:01:50.760 --> 00:01:53.400
<v Speaker 2>many vout consonants and non in the vowels at the

33
00:01:53.480 --> 00:01:56.560
<v Speaker 2>end of his name. And there's something quite funny about

34
00:01:56.560 --> 00:01:59.159
<v Speaker 2>that that I now possessed the same name.

35
00:01:59.359 --> 00:02:03.159
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, that is funny. Did what was your surname

36
00:02:03.200 --> 00:02:05.519
<v Speaker 1>at the time? Could you could you have opted to

37
00:02:05.560 --> 00:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>go for yours or did you just think, you know what,

38
00:02:07.239 --> 00:02:08.319
<v Speaker 1>it's more fun to go with.

39
00:02:09.599 --> 00:02:11.919
<v Speaker 2>So it was Gustard, which is custod but with the

40
00:02:12.000 --> 00:02:15.919
<v Speaker 2>G so it wasn't much true. I never fared well

41
00:02:16.000 --> 00:02:19.439
<v Speaker 2>with last names. I'll just you know, take smooth.

42
00:02:19.800 --> 00:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>When I married my husband, Brian, he I said, I'll

43
00:02:23.280 --> 00:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>change my name for yours. If you'll start pronouncing your

44
00:02:25.599 --> 00:02:29.479
<v Speaker 1>name correctly in my view, because he is Brian McLaughlin

45
00:02:29.840 --> 00:02:32.039
<v Speaker 1>as I would say, but his family and most Americans

46
00:02:32.080 --> 00:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>would say McLoughlin. But I've been on a sort of

47
00:02:34.800 --> 00:02:37.719
<v Speaker 1>personal campaign to reclaim that, you know, the good sort

48
00:02:37.719 --> 00:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of Scots Irish pronunciation of that name in America. None

49
00:02:43.520 --> 00:02:46.479
<v Speaker 1>of that is remotely related. Well, actually no it is.

50
00:02:46.560 --> 00:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>It is, okay, So right, of the many things that

51
00:02:49.439 --> 00:02:51.039
<v Speaker 1>we could talk about today, and I know you have

52
00:02:51.080 --> 00:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a real range of interests, I'm actually most interested to

53
00:02:54.919 --> 00:02:59.080
<v Speaker 1>talk to you about questions rising from from your penultimate

54
00:02:59.120 --> 00:03:01.479
<v Speaker 1>book or your I am not assuming that your most

55
00:03:01.479 --> 00:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>recent book is the Ultimate, the book you published in

56
00:03:04.000 --> 00:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen. Am I just in my brain? My brain?

57
00:03:07.919 --> 00:03:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I was thinking it must be am I

58
00:03:09.520 --> 00:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>just my brain? But the note I have here says,

59
00:03:11.400 --> 00:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>am I just in my brain? Which is a whole

60
00:03:12.680 --> 00:03:15.879
<v Speaker 1>other thing. Am I just my brain? Because I think

61
00:03:16.159 --> 00:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>for many people today, especially those who may not be

62
00:03:20.000 --> 00:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>coming from a religious perspective, there's an increasing interest in

63
00:03:24.560 --> 00:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>how our brains work, and what we can understand about

64
00:03:28.960 --> 00:03:32.599
<v Speaker 1>our brains from a scientific perspective relates to our sense

65
00:03:32.639 --> 00:03:38.759
<v Speaker 1>of ourselves from a kind of human perspective, And I'd

66
00:03:38.800 --> 00:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>love to hear you talk a bit like first about

67
00:03:41.439 --> 00:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>how you got interested in that whole area of thought,

68
00:03:44.919 --> 00:03:47.439
<v Speaker 1>and you know, both the science and the kind of

69
00:03:47.520 --> 00:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>non scientific questions around that, and then we'll talk a

70
00:03:51.120 --> 00:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit about how, as two people who were following

71
00:03:54.000 --> 00:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>us of Jesus, how we would think about these questions. So, yeah, first,

72
00:03:57.599 --> 00:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>do you want to give us a sense of what

73
00:03:59.560 --> 00:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>intrigued you about brain imaging in the first place.

74
00:04:02.599 --> 00:04:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, I ended up so I did biochemistry undergraduate, which

75
00:04:07.280 --> 00:04:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I loved, and I knew that I wanted to do

76
00:04:11.560 --> 00:04:14.879
<v Speaker 2>a PhD of some sort in the basic sciences, the

77
00:04:14.879 --> 00:04:19.800
<v Speaker 2>biological sciences. But biochemistry was a little bit tedious, involved

78
00:04:19.800 --> 00:04:22.600
<v Speaker 2>for petting tiny amounts of liquid from one test tube

79
00:04:22.639 --> 00:04:26.680
<v Speaker 2>to another, and not terribly interesting, although obviously generated very

80
00:04:26.720 --> 00:04:30.720
<v Speaker 2>interesting results. But brain imaging, actually I heard about a

81
00:04:30.759 --> 00:04:34.040
<v Speaker 2>friend of mine along the corridor was imaging something in

82
00:04:34.040 --> 00:04:37.399
<v Speaker 2>this slightly archaic machine holding things together with duct tape

83
00:04:37.439 --> 00:04:40.560
<v Speaker 2>and that sort of thing. Anyway, that got me fascinated

84
00:04:40.600 --> 00:04:43.079
<v Speaker 2>as to this technique that could look inside the human

85
00:04:43.120 --> 00:04:46.680
<v Speaker 2>body without cutting into it. And so I began to

86
00:04:46.759 --> 00:04:49.879
<v Speaker 2>look for sort of PhDs in that sort of area,

87
00:04:49.920 --> 00:04:54.639
<v Speaker 2>which took me via Switzerland to Cambridge to do this

88
00:04:54.720 --> 00:04:58.639
<v Speaker 2>PhD in brain imaging. And this was at a time

89
00:04:58.680 --> 00:05:02.879
<v Speaker 2>when functional I was just getting going. So it was

90
00:05:02.920 --> 00:05:07.360
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen nineties, mid to late and yeah, and so

91
00:05:07.519 --> 00:05:11.199
<v Speaker 2>people were studying all kinds of kind of fairly basic

92
00:05:11.279 --> 00:05:13.680
<v Speaker 2>functions of the human brain and trying to map them

93
00:05:14.399 --> 00:05:17.759
<v Speaker 2>using FM eye, which basically measures the signal from your

94
00:05:17.800 --> 00:05:21.319
<v Speaker 2>blood which is downstream of what's happening in your neurons,

95
00:05:21.519 --> 00:05:24.279
<v Speaker 2>and then you generate a statistical map and you can

96
00:05:24.319 --> 00:05:27.240
<v Speaker 2>look at it and that sort of thing. So this

97
00:05:27.480 --> 00:05:30.759
<v Speaker 2>was fascinating. It was a massive privilege to be working

98
00:05:30.800 --> 00:05:33.399
<v Speaker 2>in that field at a time, as you say, when

99
00:05:33.879 --> 00:05:37.399
<v Speaker 2>the sorts of discoveries that were being made was really accelerating,

100
00:05:37.959 --> 00:05:40.519
<v Speaker 2>and it was a privilege to almost have first hand

101
00:05:40.720 --> 00:05:44.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of experience in that time. I was already a

102
00:05:44.879 --> 00:05:48.279
<v Speaker 2>Christian by that point. I hadn't always been actually changed

103
00:05:48.279 --> 00:05:51.959
<v Speaker 2>my views about Christianity as an undergrad while I was

104
00:05:52.000 --> 00:05:55.639
<v Speaker 2>studying bio chemistry, but by that point I was I

105
00:05:55.720 --> 00:05:57.240
<v Speaker 2>was already a Christian.

106
00:05:57.480 --> 00:05:59.879
<v Speaker 1>So go to pause you there, because I can't help myself, Sharon,

107
00:06:00.439 --> 00:06:03.199
<v Speaker 1>I'd love for our listeners to hear more about how

108
00:06:03.240 --> 00:06:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you changed your views when it came to Christianity. Did

109
00:06:05.920 --> 00:06:07.279
<v Speaker 1>you do undergrad at Cambridge as well?

110
00:06:07.720 --> 00:06:10.959
<v Speaker 2>No, that was in Bristol. In Bristol, right, so yeah, yeah,

111
00:06:11.040 --> 00:06:13.519
<v Speaker 2>so I arrived in Bristol. Well, maybe I should go

112
00:06:13.600 --> 00:06:16.199
<v Speaker 2>back a little further. So I've known for a long

113
00:06:16.199 --> 00:06:19.720
<v Speaker 2>time that I wanted to be a scientist. I always

114
00:06:19.759 --> 00:06:23.079
<v Speaker 2>did my maths homework first. I really didn't like writing

115
00:06:23.120 --> 00:06:25.720
<v Speaker 2>long essays. I know that's a little different to you.

116
00:06:27.319 --> 00:06:30.240
<v Speaker 2>And so my A level biology teacher I really looked

117
00:06:30.319 --> 00:06:33.480
<v Speaker 2>up to, and one day she handed me this book

118
00:06:33.639 --> 00:06:37.000
<v Speaker 2>called The Selfish Gene by this person called Richard Dawkins.

119
00:06:37.040 --> 00:06:41.399
<v Speaker 2>And I kind of read this book and essentially I

120
00:06:41.480 --> 00:06:44.000
<v Speaker 2>didn't I don't know why. I didn't particularly kind of

121
00:06:44.079 --> 00:06:48.079
<v Speaker 2>question it. I just sort of absorbed at this perspective

122
00:06:48.160 --> 00:06:50.519
<v Speaker 2>that we were sort of gene machines and that our

123
00:06:50.600 --> 00:06:56.439
<v Speaker 2>genes were essentially selfish, and that, yeah, purpose of life

124
00:06:56.519 --> 00:06:59.120
<v Speaker 2>was in you know, the functioning of those genes, and

125
00:06:59.560 --> 00:07:02.439
<v Speaker 2>not really too much more than that. And I arrived

126
00:07:02.480 --> 00:07:08.639
<v Speaker 2>at university, I guess kind of agnostic. I had absorbed

127
00:07:08.720 --> 00:07:11.079
<v Speaker 2>a lot of kind of views like the ones I've

128
00:07:11.160 --> 00:07:15.600
<v Speaker 2>just espoused from like friends, from radio, from books, and

129
00:07:15.680 --> 00:07:18.959
<v Speaker 2>so on, and also the view that to be a

130
00:07:19.040 --> 00:07:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Christian or to believe in God was not compatible with

131
00:07:21.879 --> 00:07:27.079
<v Speaker 2>being a credible scientist, and so I arrived agnostic. But

132
00:07:27.160 --> 00:07:29.160
<v Speaker 2>in the first week I was invited to an event

133
00:07:29.680 --> 00:07:33.120
<v Speaker 2>called Gorilla Christian, which I ended up going to. I

134
00:07:33.160 --> 00:07:36.439
<v Speaker 2>was fascinated. Lots of people on my corridor were going

135
00:07:36.480 --> 00:07:38.759
<v Speaker 2>These were all taking place in my hall of residence,

136
00:07:39.319 --> 00:07:42.319
<v Speaker 2>and I sat through this evening of people asking questions

137
00:07:42.360 --> 00:07:45.519
<v Speaker 2>about God, and about halfway through the evening, I put

138
00:07:45.519 --> 00:07:47.720
<v Speaker 2>my hand up and asked my own question, which was,

139
00:07:48.319 --> 00:07:51.240
<v Speaker 2>surely you can't believe in God and be a credible scientist.

140
00:07:51.920 --> 00:07:54.279
<v Speaker 2>And I was given an answer that basically opened up

141
00:07:54.279 --> 00:07:57.800
<v Speaker 2>a whole vista for me of possibility and of asking

142
00:07:57.839 --> 00:08:00.680
<v Speaker 2>more questions and grilling more Christians. And it was along

143
00:08:00.720 --> 00:08:03.360
<v Speaker 2>the lines of, you know, if we asked someone to

144
00:08:03.439 --> 00:08:07.439
<v Speaker 2>choose between these two reasons that that instagram exists, one

145
00:08:07.519 --> 00:08:11.360
<v Speaker 2>because of the processes and programs that undergird it, and

146
00:08:11.399 --> 00:08:15.439
<v Speaker 2>two because Kevin's sistrom exists. I mean, you know, you

147
00:08:15.480 --> 00:08:18.079
<v Speaker 2>think about that for one second and realize we don't

148
00:08:18.079 --> 00:08:21.680
<v Speaker 2>need to choose between those two explanations for its existence.

149
00:08:21.720 --> 00:08:25.480
<v Speaker 2>They both work together in complementary ways. And I've never

150
00:08:25.839 --> 00:08:28.920
<v Speaker 2>it sounds strange, but I'd literally never heard anything like

151
00:08:28.959 --> 00:08:32.159
<v Speaker 2>that before. This was rocket science for me, if you like.

152
00:08:32.279 --> 00:08:34.960
<v Speaker 2>And it set me asking a lot more questions and

153
00:08:35.039 --> 00:08:38.639
<v Speaker 2>really more Christians. And I did that for another eighteen months,

154
00:08:38.639 --> 00:08:41.759
<v Speaker 2>and about around Easter time of my second year, I

155
00:08:41.799 --> 00:08:44.679
<v Speaker 2>realized that and I've spent some time looking at the

156
00:08:44.720 --> 00:08:47.799
<v Speaker 2>person of Jesus Christ and the kind of the way

157
00:08:47.840 --> 00:08:51.360
<v Speaker 2>that he was really different to anyone else I'd ever met,

158
00:08:51.399 --> 00:08:54.480
<v Speaker 2>in terms of not just how he treated people, but

159
00:08:54.600 --> 00:08:57.279
<v Speaker 2>the things he did in the world, and then his

160
00:08:57.320 --> 00:09:00.840
<v Speaker 2>own death and rising from the dead as well well.

161
00:09:00.919 --> 00:09:03.519
<v Speaker 2>And so I got to the point where I didn't

162
00:09:03.519 --> 00:09:06.639
<v Speaker 2>have all of my questions answered, but I did feel

163
00:09:06.679 --> 00:09:09.840
<v Speaker 2>like I had had enough questions answered to know that

164
00:09:10.240 --> 00:09:13.799
<v Speaker 2>Jesus was real, that he was alive, and that he

165
00:09:13.879 --> 00:09:18.240
<v Speaker 2>knew me, and he cared about science, and so I

166
00:09:18.360 --> 00:09:22.240
<v Speaker 2>decided to follow him. So I was twenty at that point.

167
00:09:22.799 --> 00:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I love that, I will now let you continue.

168
00:09:24.720 --> 00:09:25.919
<v Speaker 1>And what you were trying to tell us to tell

169
00:09:25.960 --> 00:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>us before? So he was saying, as an undergrad you'd

170
00:09:28.120 --> 00:09:30.039
<v Speaker 1>sort of been through that change of mine, and then

171
00:09:30.440 --> 00:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>as you were pursuing your PhD, you were getting interested

172
00:09:33.639 --> 00:09:35.799
<v Speaker 1>in how the brain works and what we can find

173
00:09:35.799 --> 00:09:36.399
<v Speaker 1>out about it.

174
00:09:36.679 --> 00:09:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I so and so in terms of the

175
00:09:39.120 --> 00:09:41.399
<v Speaker 2>areas of research, I mean I was doing some fairly

176
00:09:41.440 --> 00:09:45.480
<v Speaker 2>on interesting methodological PhD that you know. I've actually written

177
00:09:46.000 --> 00:09:48.200
<v Speaker 2>five books, isn't it. But I wouldn't recommend you read

178
00:09:48.240 --> 00:09:51.519
<v Speaker 2>the first one. It's not really interesting at all. And so,

179
00:09:51.799 --> 00:09:54.960
<v Speaker 2>and then I went on to do a postdoc in

180
00:09:55.039 --> 00:09:58.720
<v Speaker 2>the well actually a brief time in pre and post

181
00:09:58.720 --> 00:10:02.080
<v Speaker 2>surgical mapping, where we look at how brain regions are

182
00:10:02.120 --> 00:10:05.480
<v Speaker 2>displaced by things like a tumor and how kind of

183
00:10:05.519 --> 00:10:08.399
<v Speaker 2>function you know, how the brain is incredibly pastic and

184
00:10:08.919 --> 00:10:12.240
<v Speaker 2>its function can kind of adapt depending on what's happening.

185
00:10:12.480 --> 00:10:14.279
<v Speaker 2>And then I went on to do a post doc

186
00:10:14.360 --> 00:10:18.000
<v Speaker 2>in the US the Medical College of Wisconsin looking at

187
00:10:18.080 --> 00:10:22.840
<v Speaker 2>human cocaine abuse. And then that when we came back

188
00:10:22.879 --> 00:10:25.879
<v Speaker 2>to the UK, that was for me to study this

189
00:10:25.919 --> 00:10:28.519
<v Speaker 2>whole area that we're engaging in right now, really of

190
00:10:28.559 --> 00:10:32.480
<v Speaker 2>how to respond to people's questions and there's sort of

191
00:10:32.519 --> 00:10:36.120
<v Speaker 2>an irony that you know, questioning and grilling was really

192
00:10:36.159 --> 00:10:38.960
<v Speaker 2>part of my own journey and it became part of

193
00:10:39.000 --> 00:10:43.200
<v Speaker 2>what I was then to go on to do as well. Yeah,

194
00:10:43.440 --> 00:10:48.159
<v Speaker 2>so lots of different areas of neuroscience that I've sort

195
00:10:48.159 --> 00:10:49.679
<v Speaker 2>of been involved in.

196
00:10:51.120 --> 00:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>A few years ago, I was involved in an event

197
00:10:53.639 --> 00:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>at MIT, which is just down the street from where

198
00:10:55.759 --> 00:10:59.399
<v Speaker 1>I live in Cambridge, Massachusetts. And in this event there

199
00:10:59.399 --> 00:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>were two Ritian professors and to non Christian professors who

200
00:11:03.039 --> 00:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>were talking about what they believed and why, and I'll

201
00:11:05.480 --> 00:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>never forget one of the non Christian professors, who identified

202
00:11:08.360 --> 00:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>as agnostic, said this. He said, our consciousness and our

203
00:11:11.320 --> 00:11:14.679
<v Speaker 1>self awareness create the illusion that we have some sort

204
00:11:14.720 --> 00:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of special ego power, some inis, some unique existence, but

205
00:11:19.240 --> 00:11:22.039
<v Speaker 1>in reality, we are nothing but bones, tissues, gelatinous membranes,

206
00:11:22.039 --> 00:11:25.799
<v Speaker 1>electrical impulses, and chemicals. He said, we are stuff like donuts.

207
00:11:26.399 --> 00:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>And I know that's sort of pulling on various different

208
00:11:29.080 --> 00:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>threads there, but I'm curious for your reflections on whether

209
00:11:34.759 --> 00:11:38.639
<v Speaker 1>those statements are ones that are legitimated by science, or

210
00:11:38.639 --> 00:11:41.879
<v Speaker 1>whether those statements come from only a kind of reductive

211
00:11:41.960 --> 00:11:45.559
<v Speaker 1>view of science that says that we it's almost like

212
00:11:45.600 --> 00:11:47.919
<v Speaker 1>we have a kind of illusion of our own selfness,

213
00:11:48.120 --> 00:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>of our own existence that were not actually even individual

214
00:11:52.440 --> 00:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>thinking agents in our own right from a scientific perspective.

215
00:11:56.240 --> 00:11:59.360
<v Speaker 2>So this whole area, to me is really fascinating in

216
00:11:59.480 --> 00:12:03.960
<v Speaker 2>terms of how the boundary between science and philosophy is

217
00:12:04.000 --> 00:12:07.559
<v Speaker 2>sort of crossed all the time, almost without us realizing,

218
00:12:07.600 --> 00:12:11.440
<v Speaker 2>and what you end up having is kind of philosophical

219
00:12:11.480 --> 00:12:15.399
<v Speaker 2>statements being made by scientists that have the appearance of

220
00:12:15.440 --> 00:12:19.919
<v Speaker 2>being scientific, but actually what the science can show us,

221
00:12:20.360 --> 00:12:23.559
<v Speaker 2>and what is a really important part of this whole conversation,

222
00:12:23.679 --> 00:12:25.559
<v Speaker 2>is that we don't just have a brain. We also

223
00:12:25.600 --> 00:12:28.559
<v Speaker 2>have a mind. So you have a brain with all

224
00:12:28.600 --> 00:12:33.000
<v Speaker 2>of its neurons and chemicals that you can measure objectively

225
00:12:33.240 --> 00:12:35.639
<v Speaker 2>whether someone wants you to or not, you can measure

226
00:12:35.679 --> 00:12:38.559
<v Speaker 2>them in somebody. But you also have a mind. This

227
00:12:38.639 --> 00:12:41.679
<v Speaker 2>thing that the professor that you mentioned was saying is

228
00:12:41.679 --> 00:12:43.840
<v Speaker 2>a losory. We can discuss that in a minute. But

229
00:12:44.399 --> 00:12:48.480
<v Speaker 2>you have that internal sense of self that your thoughts,

230
00:12:48.559 --> 00:12:52.840
<v Speaker 2>feelings and motions, memories, decisions. As Thomas Neagil put it,

231
00:12:52.879 --> 00:12:56.120
<v Speaker 2>there's something that it is to be you. And I

232
00:12:56.120 --> 00:13:00.399
<v Speaker 2>guess the conversation hinges around what's the relationship between mind

233
00:13:00.440 --> 00:13:03.320
<v Speaker 2>and brain. But the most that the science can tell

234
00:13:03.360 --> 00:13:06.759
<v Speaker 2>you is that they're connected. It can only speak to correlation.

235
00:13:06.879 --> 00:13:09.720
<v Speaker 2>It can't speak to anything beyond that. You've got all

236
00:13:09.720 --> 00:13:14.039
<v Speaker 2>these different philosophical theories about maybe the brain generates the mind,

237
00:13:14.200 --> 00:13:18.679
<v Speaker 2>or maybe mind is its own independent, immaterial substance and

238
00:13:18.759 --> 00:13:22.000
<v Speaker 2>brain is physical and they interact. Or maybe it's that

239
00:13:22.159 --> 00:13:27.240
<v Speaker 2>actually everything has conscious properties in it, And these are

240
00:13:27.279 --> 00:13:31.720
<v Speaker 2>all different philosophical views that people impose upon the science.

241
00:13:31.759 --> 00:13:34.559
<v Speaker 2>But the science only gets you to connection. It gets

242
00:13:34.559 --> 00:13:37.679
<v Speaker 2>you to correlation. If you put someone in an MRI

243
00:13:37.919 --> 00:13:41.320
<v Speaker 2>scanner and give them a task that uses their mind,

244
00:13:41.440 --> 00:13:44.679
<v Speaker 2>say they're working memory or something, you will see networks

245
00:13:44.679 --> 00:13:47.600
<v Speaker 2>in the brain light up. So clearly these things are connected,

246
00:13:47.639 --> 00:13:51.919
<v Speaker 2>and you know, look at child development or neurodegeneration or whatever.

247
00:13:52.559 --> 00:13:57.200
<v Speaker 2>But in order to impose more than that, you actually

248
00:13:57.200 --> 00:13:59.960
<v Speaker 2>are stepping out of science and into philosophy. And that's

249
00:14:00.159 --> 00:14:04.559
<v Speaker 2>what this professor was doing in saying that the consciousness

250
00:14:04.600 --> 00:14:07.279
<v Speaker 2>is an illusion of our brains, tricking us into thinking

251
00:14:07.320 --> 00:14:09.720
<v Speaker 2>that there's something that it is to be us. And

252
00:14:09.759 --> 00:14:12.759
<v Speaker 2>of course there are some people that take that view.

253
00:14:12.759 --> 00:14:15.759
<v Speaker 2>There are many who are agnostics and atheists that don't

254
00:14:15.799 --> 00:14:18.120
<v Speaker 2>take that view. They actually think we need a more

255
00:14:18.159 --> 00:14:22.759
<v Speaker 2>persuasive explanation for the sense of self that it seems

256
00:14:22.799 --> 00:14:25.720
<v Speaker 2>to be so real. And of course, if you begin

257
00:14:25.799 --> 00:14:28.679
<v Speaker 2>to say that the very ground of your being is illusory,

258
00:14:28.720 --> 00:14:32.279
<v Speaker 2>then how can you place a weight on absolutely anything else.

259
00:14:32.960 --> 00:14:35.559
<v Speaker 2>And in fact, the viewpoint itself is subject to the

260
00:14:35.600 --> 00:14:40.440
<v Speaker 2>same state of illusion as the phenomenon that you're describing,

261
00:14:40.720 --> 00:14:45.519
<v Speaker 2>and so it becomes impossible to say anything meaningful. And

262
00:14:45.639 --> 00:14:50.600
<v Speaker 2>so obviously there are many atheist philosophers that would deeply

263
00:14:50.759 --> 00:14:54.840
<v Speaker 2>question that that view and say that we're not bound

264
00:14:54.960 --> 00:14:57.360
<v Speaker 2>to that. I think there are more persuasive views with

265
00:14:57.440 --> 00:14:58.799
<v Speaker 2>more explanatory power.

266
00:15:00.240 --> 00:15:03.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I'm sure you've come across Oard Louis who's

267
00:15:03.600 --> 00:15:06.639
<v Speaker 1>based at Oxford in your travels, as it were, And

268
00:15:07.080 --> 00:15:11.799
<v Speaker 1>I love how he expresses what sometimes scientists do or

269
00:15:11.840 --> 00:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>people speaking in the name of science from a sort

270
00:15:14.840 --> 00:15:16.919
<v Speaker 1>of atheist or agnostic perspective, which is what you call

271
00:15:17.000 --> 00:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of nothing buttery. You know, when you hear the

272
00:15:19.240 --> 00:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>words we are nothing but X, Y or Z. Actually,

273
00:15:22.759 --> 00:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>often that's going beyond what science can really tell us,

274
00:15:25.279 --> 00:15:27.399
<v Speaker 1>because science can It may well be the case that

275
00:15:27.440 --> 00:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>science can only tell us about these sort of scientifically

276
00:15:30.600 --> 00:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>measurable elements of us. But that's not the same as

277
00:15:33.200 --> 00:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>saying science proves that we are nothing but these things

278
00:15:35.600 --> 00:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that we can actually have it understanding that, like science

279
00:15:38.279 --> 00:15:40.159
<v Speaker 1>isn't the right tool for answering all the questions that

280
00:15:40.159 --> 00:15:41.519
<v Speaker 1>we might have about.

281
00:15:41.399 --> 00:15:43.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I would actually argue, and I argue it

282
00:15:43.799 --> 00:15:46.720
<v Speaker 2>in my book, Am I Just My Brain? That it's

283
00:15:46.799 --> 00:15:49.759
<v Speaker 2>within science that we see that we're more than just

284
00:15:50.480 --> 00:15:54.360
<v Speaker 2>on neurons. There are all kinds of really fascinating instances

285
00:15:54.399 --> 00:15:59.120
<v Speaker 2>in clinical medicine that show that we're actually highly complex things.

286
00:15:59.200 --> 00:16:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Like you know, there's a small proportion of adults that

287
00:16:02.759 --> 00:16:06.559
<v Speaker 2>have survived childhood hydron carefully water on the brain, where

288
00:16:06.559 --> 00:16:10.120
<v Speaker 2>they're basically missing around ninety percent of their brain tissue,

289
00:16:10.480 --> 00:16:14.679
<v Speaker 2>and yet they are fully functioning healthy adults. Or we

290
00:16:14.720 --> 00:16:18.639
<v Speaker 2>could look at there's a fascinating phenomenon that's really coming

291
00:16:18.720 --> 00:16:22.320
<v Speaker 2>through more and more these days called terminal lucidity, where

292
00:16:22.480 --> 00:16:26.200
<v Speaker 2>people with an advanced state of neurodegeneration have a very

293
00:16:26.320 --> 00:16:30.759
<v Speaker 2>temporary but very real return to the self towards the

294
00:16:30.840 --> 00:16:33.360
<v Speaker 2>end of their life, often just before they die. And

295
00:16:33.399 --> 00:16:36.159
<v Speaker 2>of course there's the phenomenon of near death experiences which

296
00:16:36.240 --> 00:16:38.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, some might say is controversial, some say is

297
00:16:38.919 --> 00:16:42.039
<v Speaker 2>really fascinating, where people have been declared dead on the

298
00:16:42.080 --> 00:16:46.759
<v Speaker 2>operating table and yet have been resuscitated and come around

299
00:16:46.799 --> 00:16:50.120
<v Speaker 2>to say that they were actually vividly conscious and heard

300
00:16:50.200 --> 00:16:53.759
<v Speaker 2>them being declared, themselves being declared. So you know, that's

301
00:16:53.799 --> 00:16:55.960
<v Speaker 2>an instance of you know, when their brain has died,

302
00:16:56.000 --> 00:16:59.519
<v Speaker 2>what happens to the conscious mind At the very least,

303
00:16:59.519 --> 00:17:02.720
<v Speaker 2>it's fast. And you know, if we are just our brains,

304
00:17:02.840 --> 00:17:05.400
<v Speaker 2>none of these phenomena make any sense at all. And

305
00:17:05.440 --> 00:17:09.119
<v Speaker 2>so perhaps we need a more sophisticated and more nuanced,

306
00:17:09.119 --> 00:17:14.240
<v Speaker 2>more complex way of describing human beings. That I actually

307
00:17:14.240 --> 00:17:17.640
<v Speaker 2>think that the Christian worldview helps us with a lot.

308
00:17:17.799 --> 00:17:20.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, right at the beginning of the Bible, in

309
00:17:20.440 --> 00:17:24.319
<v Speaker 2>the Book of Genesis, it describes not necessarily literally, but

310
00:17:24.640 --> 00:17:28.759
<v Speaker 2>the formation of human beings that is not in conflict

311
00:17:28.799 --> 00:17:32.240
<v Speaker 2>with the science, I don't think. And it says, you know,

312
00:17:32.279 --> 00:17:34.640
<v Speaker 2>that the Lord God formed the man from the dust

313
00:17:34.640 --> 00:17:37.960
<v Speaker 2>of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath

314
00:17:38.000 --> 00:17:40.839
<v Speaker 2>of life, and the man became a living being. And

315
00:17:40.880 --> 00:17:43.799
<v Speaker 2>so we see, you know, that we are a combination

316
00:17:43.920 --> 00:17:46.839
<v Speaker 2>of dust and breath, and the word for breath is

317
00:17:47.079 --> 00:17:51.920
<v Speaker 2>spirit or breath, and the product of those two things

318
00:17:52.000 --> 00:17:55.000
<v Speaker 2>is a living nefche. And the word nephesh is a soul.

319
00:17:55.599 --> 00:17:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Now we often get soul think of it a bit differently,

320
00:17:59.000 --> 00:18:02.480
<v Speaker 2>but actually soul is a very holistic term in Hebrew.

321
00:18:02.839 --> 00:18:06.599
<v Speaker 2>So human beings are whole, but they have different component

322
00:18:06.680 --> 00:18:10.400
<v Speaker 2>parts and they're complex, and that seems to match with

323
00:18:10.799 --> 00:18:13.920
<v Speaker 2>how life seems to work. I don't know, you know, life,

324
00:18:14.200 --> 00:18:17.400
<v Speaker 2>human beings seem to be hard to box, you know,

325
00:18:17.559 --> 00:18:20.720
<v Speaker 2>hard to pin down, and they do strange things, and

326
00:18:21.319 --> 00:18:23.480
<v Speaker 2>we need a model that helps us with that.

327
00:18:24.039 --> 00:18:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, I think one of the things that often

328
00:18:26.799 --> 00:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>people aren't aware, perhaps especially if they are not Christians themselves,

329
00:18:31.519 --> 00:18:34.839
<v Speaker 1>is that the message of Christianity is not that if

330
00:18:34.839 --> 00:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you put your trust in Jesus that you will then

331
00:18:37.799 --> 00:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of live in disembodied you know, your soul will

332
00:18:40.519 --> 00:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of float off into disembodied bliss in this ethereal

333
00:18:44.279 --> 00:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>place called heaven forever, but that actually, when Jesus comes

334
00:18:48.680 --> 00:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>back to this earth, that he will call us into

335
00:18:52.039 --> 00:18:55.799
<v Speaker 1>resurrection life with actual physical bodies. Now we don't have

336
00:18:55.839 --> 00:18:58.039
<v Speaker 1>all the details of what those bodies will be like,

337
00:18:58.119 --> 00:19:00.359
<v Speaker 1>because we know, on the one hand, we have the

338
00:19:00.359 --> 00:19:03.920
<v Speaker 1>example of Jesus's body, which after his resurrection was enough

339
00:19:03.960 --> 00:19:06.880
<v Speaker 1>similar to his body before that people could recognize him.

340
00:19:07.359 --> 00:19:10.759
<v Speaker 1>He still had the scars, the nail sort of prints

341
00:19:10.359 --> 00:19:12.799
<v Speaker 1>in his hands, and the hole in his side where

342
00:19:12.799 --> 00:19:15.440
<v Speaker 1>a Roman soldier had sort of shrubbed as his spirit

343
00:19:15.440 --> 00:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>in there, but he was also able to kind of

344
00:19:17.720 --> 00:19:20.599
<v Speaker 1>walk through walls essentially, So we you know, I think

345
00:19:20.640 --> 00:19:22.640
<v Speaker 1>we have so much that we don't know about what

346
00:19:22.680 --> 00:19:26.799
<v Speaker 1>these resurrection bodies will be like. But we also have

347
00:19:27.000 --> 00:19:30.319
<v Speaker 1>the repeated sort of assurance in the New Testament that

348
00:19:30.400 --> 00:19:33.799
<v Speaker 1>we will, if we've trustedes will be raised to a

349
00:19:33.920 --> 00:19:37.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of physical existence, not just the kind of spiritual

350
00:19:37.440 --> 00:19:39.759
<v Speaker 1>existence floating off that actually are kind of our soul

351
00:19:39.759 --> 00:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and our body as we belong together.

352
00:19:41.839 --> 00:19:44.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely, and often the thought of it being a

353
00:19:44.759 --> 00:19:47.759
<v Speaker 2>bit ghostly floaty is not a pleasant one people that

354
00:19:47.759 --> 00:19:50.160
<v Speaker 2>that feels that that's not necessarily somewhere I'd want to be.

355
00:19:50.319 --> 00:19:54.440
<v Speaker 2>But imagine a reality that's every bit as real as

356
00:19:54.519 --> 00:19:57.480
<v Speaker 2>this that the one that we have now, but you know,

357
00:19:57.599 --> 00:20:01.720
<v Speaker 2>a million times more beautiful and more And now that's

358
00:20:01.720 --> 00:20:04.279
<v Speaker 2>something I can get on board with, you know, rather

359
00:20:04.359 --> 00:20:07.599
<v Speaker 2>than a slightly ethereal something that doesn't really have any

360
00:20:07.640 --> 00:20:11.279
<v Speaker 2>bearing on this life. But the thing that's also really

361
00:20:11.559 --> 00:20:15.960
<v Speaker 2>amazing for the Christian you know, Jesus says, you know,

362
00:20:16.440 --> 00:20:19.880
<v Speaker 2>that eternal life begins when you turn to him in

363
00:20:19.920 --> 00:20:23.119
<v Speaker 2>this life. That he says that this is eternal life,

364
00:20:23.119 --> 00:20:26.599
<v Speaker 2>that they may know you the only God and Jesus

365
00:20:26.640 --> 00:20:30.440
<v Speaker 2>whom you have sent. In other words, that actually the

366
00:20:30.640 --> 00:20:35.279
<v Speaker 2>life that will carry on beyond death begins now. It

367
00:20:35.319 --> 00:20:40.039
<v Speaker 2>becomes more embodied in the future, but it actually starts now,

368
00:20:40.119 --> 00:20:46.160
<v Speaker 2>and that that's amazing. And yeah, I definitely experience the

369
00:20:46.240 --> 00:20:50.240
<v Speaker 2>reality of that life being breathed into kind of dead

370
00:20:50.279 --> 00:20:54.680
<v Speaker 2>places in my own life as a student, even in

371
00:20:54.720 --> 00:20:58.200
<v Speaker 2>just like really mundane stuff like being a bit of

372
00:20:58.200 --> 00:21:03.000
<v Speaker 2>a workaholic, you know, and just trusting that God was

373
00:21:03.039 --> 00:21:05.000
<v Speaker 2>going to get me through something that I didn't think

374
00:21:05.000 --> 00:21:08.519
<v Speaker 2>I could get myself through the first verses of Psalm

375
00:21:08.680 --> 00:21:11.519
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven are some of the first words that I read.

376
00:21:11.960 --> 00:21:14.880
<v Speaker 2>The Lord is my Light and my salvation. Whom shall

377
00:21:14.880 --> 00:21:17.880
<v Speaker 2>I fear? The Lord is a stronghold of my life,

378
00:21:17.920 --> 00:21:21.319
<v Speaker 2>of whom shall I be afraid? And I just remember

379
00:21:21.400 --> 00:21:24.759
<v Speaker 2>really clinging to those that actually, I've entrusted myself to

380
00:21:24.759 --> 00:21:28.279
<v Speaker 2>a being who is bigger than myself, and that's actually

381
00:21:28.279 --> 00:21:31.000
<v Speaker 2>incredibly comforting. It's not just all on me to get

382
00:21:31.000 --> 00:21:34.880
<v Speaker 2>myself through this. There's someone who's, if you like, following

383
00:21:34.920 --> 00:21:37.839
<v Speaker 2>me or walking with me, or has got me. And

384
00:21:38.759 --> 00:21:42.799
<v Speaker 2>that was amazing. Yeah, that eternal life is really practical

385
00:21:42.839 --> 00:21:43.640
<v Speaker 2>and really real.

386
00:21:44.680 --> 00:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>What would you say to somebody listening to you who said,

387
00:21:47.519 --> 00:21:51.279
<v Speaker 1>you know what, this just confirms my understanding that Christianity

388
00:21:51.359 --> 00:21:54.319
<v Speaker 1>is a crutch for people who can't deal with the

389
00:21:54.359 --> 00:21:57.039
<v Speaker 1>realities of life. You can't deal with, you know, the

390
00:21:57.079 --> 00:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>brute facts of science that are telling us that actually

391
00:21:59.720 --> 00:22:03.039
<v Speaker 1>there is no meaning and purpose in our lives and

392
00:22:03.519 --> 00:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>don't have the courage to make a purpose for themselves.

393
00:22:06.480 --> 00:22:09.920
<v Speaker 1>That people like you and me are imagining this god

394
00:22:09.960 --> 00:22:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in the sky who has a purpose for our lives,

395
00:22:12.319 --> 00:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's really just sort of delusion and an emotional crutch.

396
00:22:15.640 --> 00:22:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, it's a really valid question. I would actually

397
00:22:19.160 --> 00:22:22.279
<v Speaker 2>say the argument for crutch works both ways. You could

398
00:22:22.319 --> 00:22:27.000
<v Speaker 2>also argue that the atheist or the agnostic has refused

399
00:22:27.680 --> 00:22:31.079
<v Speaker 2>or rather you choose as not to believe in God,

400
00:22:31.200 --> 00:22:33.759
<v Speaker 2>or has persuaded that God doesn't exist as a way

401
00:22:33.799 --> 00:22:37.240
<v Speaker 2>to avoid being accountable to a higher being, as a

402
00:22:37.279 --> 00:22:41.720
<v Speaker 2>way to avoid having to think about those bigger questions

403
00:22:42.160 --> 00:22:46.279
<v Speaker 2>of life as well. And so whether you can argue

404
00:22:46.400 --> 00:22:49.640
<v Speaker 2>the Crutch argument in favor of God's existence or away

405
00:22:49.640 --> 00:22:52.440
<v Speaker 2>from his existence, so that doesn't help us. What we

406
00:22:52.519 --> 00:22:55.759
<v Speaker 2>need to answer is does he exist or not? And

407
00:22:55.799 --> 00:22:58.799
<v Speaker 2>for that we need to look at our lives and ask, well,

408
00:22:59.119 --> 00:23:03.279
<v Speaker 2>where are the most persuasive arguments for why we seem

409
00:23:03.319 --> 00:23:06.160
<v Speaker 2>to long for meaning and you know, or or a

410
00:23:06.240 --> 00:23:10.920
<v Speaker 2>sense of purpose? Or you know why science works, or

411
00:23:11.359 --> 00:23:14.880
<v Speaker 2>why the universe holds together the way that it does,

412
00:23:15.240 --> 00:23:17.920
<v Speaker 2>why there is suffering and evil in the world. Where

413
00:23:17.960 --> 00:23:23.480
<v Speaker 2>do the most persuasive answers lie to those big questions

414
00:23:23.519 --> 00:23:26.720
<v Speaker 2>of life that we have? And my experience has been

415
00:23:26.759 --> 00:23:29.400
<v Speaker 2>that actually it's the existence of God that helps us

416
00:23:29.480 --> 00:23:32.920
<v Speaker 2>make more sense of life, rather than throwing us into

417
00:23:33.079 --> 00:23:37.079
<v Speaker 2>greater confusion and into some sort of intellectual fog and darkness.

418
00:23:37.799 --> 00:23:40.079
<v Speaker 2>I don't believe science does have all the answers. I

419
00:23:40.079 --> 00:23:43.200
<v Speaker 2>don't think it can speak to questions of meaning, but

420
00:23:43.240 --> 00:23:46.279
<v Speaker 2>we do. We are drawn to a sense of meaning,

421
00:23:46.319 --> 00:23:48.640
<v Speaker 2>even if it's that in the absence of our belief

422
00:23:48.680 --> 00:23:51.359
<v Speaker 2>in God. We want to create our own sense of meaning. Well,

423
00:23:51.400 --> 00:23:54.960
<v Speaker 2>why bother if there is no ultimate meaning? And yet,

424
00:23:55.000 --> 00:23:58.960
<v Speaker 2>if there is a meaningful being behind the universe, then

425
00:23:59.079 --> 00:24:02.119
<v Speaker 2>there's a grounding for our longing for our lives to

426
00:24:02.200 --> 00:24:04.839
<v Speaker 2>have purpose, to have meaning because we're made by a

427
00:24:04.839 --> 00:24:07.720
<v Speaker 2>God who has made us for purpose. That we're not

428
00:24:07.880 --> 00:24:12.839
<v Speaker 2>here by accident. There is actually reason and purpose in

429
00:24:12.920 --> 00:24:16.359
<v Speaker 2>each individual life, as well as the human race as

430
00:24:16.359 --> 00:24:16.759
<v Speaker 2>a whole.

431
00:24:17.440 --> 00:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>One of the questions you listed there that it would

432
00:24:20.680 --> 00:24:22.839
<v Speaker 1>be worth us sort of looking at is why does

433
00:24:22.839 --> 00:24:25.279
<v Speaker 1>science work? I want to double click on on that

434
00:24:25.319 --> 00:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>one because of your particular background and expertise. So for

435
00:24:29.039 --> 00:24:32.960
<v Speaker 1>many people, I think their assumption is that science has

436
00:24:33.000 --> 00:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>really been a project of offering an alternative hypothesis to

437
00:24:36.480 --> 00:24:38.200
<v Speaker 1>believe in a creator God like you know, the more

438
00:24:38.240 --> 00:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that science explains of the world, whether it's of the

439
00:24:41.000 --> 00:24:43.799
<v Speaker 1>universe rit larger, whether it's what happens between your ears

440
00:24:43.799 --> 00:24:46.599
<v Speaker 1>and my ears, you know in terms of our brains

441
00:24:46.680 --> 00:24:49.519
<v Speaker 1>that the more science explains, the less need there is

442
00:24:50.119 --> 00:24:53.799
<v Speaker 1>for God. So help us help us understand that question.

443
00:24:53.920 --> 00:24:55.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, why does science even even work? Which is

444
00:24:55.880 --> 00:24:58.759
<v Speaker 1>maybe a question that people often aren't asking, as they

445
00:24:58.759 --> 00:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>sort of stand on on the sup is it lee

446
00:25:00.480 --> 00:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>solid ground of science to justify their disbelief in God?

447
00:25:04.039 --> 00:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Help us understand what God has to do with the

448
00:25:07.000 --> 00:25:09.119
<v Speaker 1>question of why science works completely.

449
00:25:09.119 --> 00:25:11.039
<v Speaker 2>And it's really important to say at first that the

450
00:25:11.160 --> 00:25:14.720
<v Speaker 2>very question why does science work is not a scientific

451
00:25:14.799 --> 00:25:19.039
<v Speaker 2>question that science itself can answer. It's again it's sitting

452
00:25:19.079 --> 00:25:24.000
<v Speaker 2>in the realm of philosophy and theology. And you know,

453
00:25:24.920 --> 00:25:28.599
<v Speaker 2>I think that science works because of two things, Because

454
00:25:28.720 --> 00:25:31.519
<v Speaker 2>there is order in nature and there's order in the

455
00:25:31.599 --> 00:25:35.960
<v Speaker 2>human mind. And without those two things, no study would

456
00:25:35.960 --> 00:25:38.359
<v Speaker 2>be possible. And so, you know, if you were to

457
00:25:38.400 --> 00:25:41.480
<v Speaker 2>set up a study over in Boston and we know

458
00:25:41.559 --> 00:25:45.799
<v Speaker 2>that we're onto something, we know that there's a theory

459
00:25:45.880 --> 00:25:48.039
<v Speaker 2>that we're pretty sure that if we can just collect

460
00:25:48.039 --> 00:25:50.240
<v Speaker 2>the data, it'll come through. And then we come over

461
00:25:50.279 --> 00:25:55.400
<v Speaker 2>to Oxford and we repeat the same study exactly what

462
00:25:55.519 --> 00:25:58.599
<v Speaker 2>we ought to see the same results. And the reason

463
00:25:58.640 --> 00:26:02.400
<v Speaker 2>for that is because there's an underlying order to the

464
00:26:02.480 --> 00:26:07.599
<v Speaker 2>natural world without which science can't operate. Now, what's the

465
00:26:07.599 --> 00:26:12.400
<v Speaker 2>most persuasive explanation for that order? And the order kind

466
00:26:12.400 --> 00:26:16.160
<v Speaker 2>of yeah, is it is the most persuasive explanation that

467
00:26:16.759 --> 00:26:21.079
<v Speaker 2>there's a kind of accidental, kind of random process over

468
00:26:21.119 --> 00:26:23.400
<v Speaker 2>a long period of time has sort of somehow given

469
00:26:23.480 --> 00:26:26.319
<v Speaker 2>rise to order. Or is it that there was an

470
00:26:26.440 --> 00:26:32.079
<v Speaker 2>orderer undergirding the cosmos, which is more persuasive. Secondly, that

471
00:26:32.319 --> 00:26:34.680
<v Speaker 2>the order in the human mind, the fact that we've

472
00:26:34.680 --> 00:26:36.559
<v Speaker 2>already talked about this a little bit, the fact that

473
00:26:36.599 --> 00:26:39.799
<v Speaker 2>we can reason and make sense of things that we're

474
00:26:39.880 --> 00:26:43.440
<v Speaker 2>curious about the world. Where where did the most persuasive

475
00:26:43.480 --> 00:26:47.960
<v Speaker 2>explanations for the human mind come from? Is it that

476
00:26:48.400 --> 00:26:53.079
<v Speaker 2>you know that we live in a universe of time

477
00:26:53.200 --> 00:26:56.880
<v Speaker 2>plus of matter and a chance, but it's non conscious,

478
00:26:56.920 --> 00:27:00.759
<v Speaker 2>it's just molecules. Or is it the case that actually

479
00:27:01.119 --> 00:27:04.319
<v Speaker 2>there's a mind behind the cosmos that has somehow given

480
00:27:04.480 --> 00:27:09.160
<v Speaker 2>rise to human beings. Well, the first explanation is not impossible,

481
00:27:09.720 --> 00:27:12.880
<v Speaker 2>but it's kind of surprising. Why would a mindless universe

482
00:27:12.920 --> 00:27:16.400
<v Speaker 2>give rise to mindful humans. It makes a lot more

483
00:27:16.440 --> 00:27:19.400
<v Speaker 2>sense that there was a mind in the beginning, which,

484
00:27:19.440 --> 00:27:21.880
<v Speaker 2>of course the very first words of Genesis say, in

485
00:27:21.960 --> 00:27:25.440
<v Speaker 2>the beginning God and then this God created the heavens

486
00:27:25.440 --> 00:27:30.119
<v Speaker 2>and the earth. Personally, scientifically speaking, I'm more persuaded by

487
00:27:30.759 --> 00:27:34.319
<v Speaker 2>the second explanation. In other words, you could make a

488
00:27:34.400 --> 00:27:37.759
<v Speaker 2>case that it's actually the very existence of God that

489
00:27:37.880 --> 00:27:41.039
<v Speaker 2>gives us the grounding for why science even works in

490
00:27:41.079 --> 00:27:44.160
<v Speaker 2>the first place, which is kind of a crazy place

491
00:27:44.240 --> 00:27:46.039
<v Speaker 2>to be given that we spend a lot of our

492
00:27:46.079 --> 00:27:50.240
<v Speaker 2>time responding to the view that science has disproved God,

493
00:27:50.279 --> 00:27:53.759
<v Speaker 2>and because you now have mechanisms, you no longer need God.

494
00:27:53.799 --> 00:27:57.799
<v Speaker 2>He's being squeezed out of the picture. But my earlier

495
00:27:57.880 --> 00:28:01.759
<v Speaker 2>example about Kevin Sistrom and in Instagram show you know,

496
00:28:01.920 --> 00:28:05.240
<v Speaker 2>shows that that need not be the case. You know,

497
00:28:05.279 --> 00:28:10.359
<v Speaker 2>you can perfectly well study the mechanisms and also know

498
00:28:10.599 --> 00:28:15.279
<v Speaker 2>that the reality of the creator behind it, and actually

499
00:28:15.359 --> 00:28:18.599
<v Speaker 2>both are needed for a more complete understanding of Instagram.

500
00:28:18.640 --> 00:28:20.839
<v Speaker 2>If you try and just understand it in terms of

501
00:28:21.279 --> 00:28:24.319
<v Speaker 2>whatever the programming script is, I'm a bit out of data.

502
00:28:24.319 --> 00:28:26.759
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what the us is it Java or something.

503
00:28:27.079 --> 00:28:29.680
<v Speaker 2>If you just try and understand Instagram in terms of

504
00:28:29.799 --> 00:28:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Java and you leave out Kevin Sistrom, you are left

505
00:28:32.480 --> 00:28:36.559
<v Speaker 2>with an incomplete understanding of Instagram. It's actually to the

506
00:28:36.599 --> 00:28:40.119
<v Speaker 2>two together that give you a more complete picture of reality.

507
00:28:40.160 --> 00:28:42.720
<v Speaker 2>And that's what I see it being with science and God.

508
00:28:42.759 --> 00:28:46.599
<v Speaker 2>It's actually, you have a diminished view of the natural world,

509
00:28:46.599 --> 00:28:52.160
<v Speaker 2>even a diminished potentially you know, not diminished kind of

510
00:28:52.640 --> 00:28:56.359
<v Speaker 2>a framework for even the conduct of science if we

511
00:28:56.480 --> 00:28:59.720
<v Speaker 2>leave out the one that started it all and continues

512
00:28:59.759 --> 00:29:00.960
<v Speaker 2>to pulled it today.

513
00:29:01.039 --> 00:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, that's really helpful. Fun fact, I was today

514
00:29:03.920 --> 00:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>years old when I found out that somebody named Kevin

515
00:29:06.759 --> 00:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>came up with Instagram. That's news to me, but I

516
00:29:09.480 --> 00:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Yeah, And I think what you've said there

517
00:29:13.480 --> 00:29:16.839
<v Speaker 1>is really helpful, Sharon. I think people also often don't

518
00:29:17.000 --> 00:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>know the kind of Christian origins of what we now

519
00:29:19.960 --> 00:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>call science, and the way the Revolution was driven by

520
00:29:23.839 --> 00:29:27.720
<v Speaker 1>people who believed that the God described in the Bible

521
00:29:27.839 --> 00:29:30.680
<v Speaker 1>was the god behind the universe, a god who is

522
00:29:30.839 --> 00:29:34.319
<v Speaker 1>orderly and lawgiving, and who created humans in his image

523
00:29:34.559 --> 00:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>so that we might actually, among other things, be able

524
00:29:37.160 --> 00:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to discern the underlying kind of principles that the regular

525
00:29:41.759 --> 00:29:44.559
<v Speaker 1>laws and principles that He's created his universe on the

526
00:29:44.599 --> 00:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>basis of. I love the sort of history of science

527
00:29:48.640 --> 00:29:53.079
<v Speaker 1>behind that that often gets lost, I think, especially especially

528
00:29:53.079 --> 00:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>when we listen too much to our fellow countrymen like

529
00:29:56.279 --> 00:29:59.559
<v Speaker 1>Richard Dawkins and those who want to make want a

530
00:29:59.599 --> 00:30:02.119
<v Speaker 1>sort of pro the idea that science by definition is

531
00:30:02.240 --> 00:30:05.119
<v Speaker 1>a project that's going to draw your way from Christianity,

532
00:30:05.319 --> 00:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>or that the story of science and Christianity has always

533
00:30:08.000 --> 00:30:12.119
<v Speaker 1>been a sort of story of scientists victorious defeating ignorant Christians,

534
00:30:12.599 --> 00:30:15.559
<v Speaker 1>when so often Christians have been involved in some of

535
00:30:15.559 --> 00:30:17.759
<v Speaker 1>the great discoveries of science over the last sort of

536
00:30:17.759 --> 00:30:18.599
<v Speaker 1>four hundred years.

537
00:30:19.119 --> 00:30:21.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, Sharon tell.

538
00:30:21.000 --> 00:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Us probably last question, because I'm sort of intrigued what

539
00:30:24.359 --> 00:30:26.039
<v Speaker 1>your answer is going to be on this. What is

540
00:30:26.119 --> 00:30:31.119
<v Speaker 1>the most fascinating thing about the brain that you have discovered?

541
00:30:31.160 --> 00:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't just mean in li like in your own

542
00:30:32.480 --> 00:30:36.079
<v Speaker 1>personal research, but that you've come across, Like, what's your

543
00:30:36.160 --> 00:30:40.160
<v Speaker 1>top kind of fun fact about our brains that you

544
00:30:40.359 --> 00:30:43.480
<v Speaker 1>like telling people about, if they, like me, are less

545
00:30:43.720 --> 00:30:46.960
<v Speaker 1>steeped in the science of brains.

546
00:30:46.920 --> 00:30:50.119
<v Speaker 2>At any one moment. There's enough electrical activity to power

547
00:30:50.200 --> 00:30:53.160
<v Speaker 2>an LED light, if that's of any use to you

548
00:30:53.519 --> 00:30:57.680
<v Speaker 2>going today, which brings new emphasis to the notion of

549
00:30:57.799 --> 00:31:01.119
<v Speaker 2>having a light bulb moment, right. But perhaps on a

550
00:31:01.200 --> 00:31:04.559
<v Speaker 2>slightly more serious note, I guess the more that I've

551
00:31:04.880 --> 00:31:09.440
<v Speaker 2>thought about mind and brain and human consciousness, the thing

552
00:31:09.519 --> 00:31:12.640
<v Speaker 2>that fascinates in me is the amount that we don't know,

553
00:31:13.039 --> 00:31:18.720
<v Speaker 2>that we don't understand, and that, yeah, the complexity and

554
00:31:19.079 --> 00:31:22.400
<v Speaker 2>the anomalies you know, where something very different most of

555
00:31:22.440 --> 00:31:26.200
<v Speaker 2>the time this happens, but occasionally this happens, and how

556
00:31:26.319 --> 00:31:29.200
<v Speaker 2>we make sense of that? And yeah, I just think

557
00:31:29.480 --> 00:31:33.079
<v Speaker 2>human beings are fascinating and they resist the boxes that

558
00:31:33.240 --> 00:31:34.799
<v Speaker 2>we sometimes try and put them in.

559
00:31:35.039 --> 00:31:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, thanks so much for being with me, Sharon, and

560
00:31:37.480 --> 00:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>for sharing some of your own story as well as

561
00:31:39.480 --> 00:31:43.079
<v Speaker 1>some of your research and thinking over the decades that

562
00:31:43.119 --> 00:31:45.559
<v Speaker 1>you've been thinking about these questions. And for those who

563
00:31:45.559 --> 00:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>want to know more, you could grab a copy of

564
00:31:47.680 --> 00:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Sharon's book, Am I Just My Brain and learn much

565
00:31:51.480 --> 00:31:55.039
<v Speaker 1>more from there as well. If you would like, you

566
00:31:55.079 --> 00:31:58.400
<v Speaker 1>could follow the Come Friend of Christianity podcast on Instagram

567
00:31:58.839 --> 00:32:02.720
<v Speaker 1>apparently invented by a guy called Kevin and Twitter slash

568
00:32:03.000 --> 00:32:06.359
<v Speaker 1>x who knows I mean a relation to Bob and Stewart,

569
00:32:07.319 --> 00:32:10.359
<v Speaker 1>or you can leave a review on iTunes and that

570
00:32:10.519 --> 00:32:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you can mention if there's a topic or question that

571
00:32:12.759 --> 00:32:15.119
<v Speaker 1>you would like to see explored in a future episode.

572
00:32:15.720 --> 00:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Until I talk into your earphones next week, I hope

573
00:32:20.119 --> 00:32:24.559
<v Speaker 1>you reflect on your brain and whether if you're a Christian,

574
00:32:24.599 --> 00:32:27.240
<v Speaker 1>perhaps you could praise God for the brain that he's

575
00:32:27.319 --> 00:32:30.400
<v Speaker 1>given you and the opportunities he's given you to use it.

576
00:32:30.640 --> 00:32:35.519
<v Speaker 1>And if you exploring Christianity or skeptical of Christianity, maybe

577
00:32:36.200 --> 00:32:39.559
<v Speaker 1>ask yourself the question of whether you have bought two

578
00:32:39.839 --> 00:32:42.799
<v Speaker 1>simple answers when it comes to what our brains might

579
00:32:42.880 --> 00:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>be and how they might relate to our sense of

580
00:32:45.440 --> 00:32:45.839
<v Speaker 1>who we are
