WEBVTT

1
00:00:04.559 --> 00:00:06.879
<v Speaker 1>The Bible doesn't say if you're a Protestant or Catholic

2
00:00:06.960 --> 00:00:08.279
<v Speaker 1>or art actually will be saved.

3
00:00:08.359 --> 00:00:09.880
<v Speaker 2>It says you must be born again.

4
00:00:10.800 --> 00:00:12.919
<v Speaker 3>Now, But what does that mean because the rest of

5
00:00:12.960 --> 00:00:15.960
<v Speaker 3>the New Testament texts talk about that being baptism.

6
00:00:16.440 --> 00:00:19.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, born again is we have three kinds.

7
00:00:18.879 --> 00:00:19.839
<v Speaker 2>Of death in the Bible.

8
00:00:19.920 --> 00:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>When is it physical death, spiritual death, and eternal death

9
00:00:23.280 --> 00:00:25.039
<v Speaker 1>which is also called second death?

10
00:00:25.760 --> 00:00:28.320
<v Speaker 3>So that what does it have to do with baptism?

11
00:00:28.359 --> 00:00:31.199
<v Speaker 2>What I just said, baptism is an.

12
00:00:31.160 --> 00:00:35.679
<v Speaker 3>Outer you're just repeating Protestant Baptist doctrines. And I'm telling

13
00:00:35.679 --> 00:00:37.840
<v Speaker 3>you in Titus three five it's called the washing of

14
00:00:37.840 --> 00:00:38.799
<v Speaker 3>the labor regeneration.

15
00:00:40.159 --> 00:00:42.039
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but that's in this speed's what happens.

16
00:00:42.079 --> 00:00:44.000
<v Speaker 3>How do you know that you're just asserting that when

17
00:00:44.399 --> 00:00:46.240
<v Speaker 3>Paul doesn't make that distinction. How do you know that

18
00:00:46.280 --> 00:00:50.200
<v Speaker 3>every time Paul talks about baptism is quote spiritual, Well.

19
00:00:50.079 --> 00:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>The baptism was an outer confession.

20
00:00:52.399 --> 00:00:54.520
<v Speaker 3>You're just restating the question I'm asking you, how do

21
00:00:54.560 --> 00:00:56.439
<v Speaker 3>you know that that's what Paul means and all those

22
00:00:56.479 --> 00:00:58.840
<v Speaker 3>passages about baptism.

23
00:00:58.359 --> 00:00:59.679
<v Speaker 2>Because it's all over the Bible.

24
00:00:59.679 --> 00:01:02.560
<v Speaker 3>It's so the answer is it's all over when that's

25
00:01:02.600 --> 00:01:04.959
<v Speaker 3>the thing I'm asking you. So, in other words, so,

26
00:01:04.959 --> 00:01:06.840
<v Speaker 3>why what are you for the third time going to

27
00:01:06.920 --> 00:01:08.319
<v Speaker 3>just tell me your interpretation again?

28
00:01:09.480 --> 00:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>No, it's not my Interpretation's what the Bible says.

29
00:01:12.480 --> 00:01:14.519
<v Speaker 3>That's what you're saying. That's what the Bible says, and

30
00:01:14.599 --> 00:01:16.719
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying no. In John three, I think Jesus is

31
00:01:16.760 --> 00:01:19.719
<v Speaker 3>talking about water baptism, and that's why Acts two Peter says,

32
00:01:19.760 --> 00:01:22.400
<v Speaker 3>repent and be baptized for the remission of sins? Is

33
00:01:22.400 --> 00:01:24.599
<v Speaker 3>it water baptism in Acts two thirty eight thirty nine.

34
00:01:25.319 --> 00:01:27.359
<v Speaker 2>What the bone again happens that repair?

35
00:01:27.519 --> 00:01:31.400
<v Speaker 3>Is it water baptism in Acts two thirty eight thirty nine. Yes,

36
00:01:32.000 --> 00:01:33.519
<v Speaker 3>oh it is. But that's where he says, is the

37
00:01:33.560 --> 00:01:34.480
<v Speaker 3>remission of sins?

38
00:01:35.439 --> 00:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>No, the remission of sins it doesn't happen with washing.

39
00:01:37.959 --> 00:01:38.439
<v Speaker 2>In the water.

40
00:01:38.560 --> 00:01:40.840
<v Speaker 3>It literally says that in X two thirty eight thirty nine.

41
00:01:41.519 --> 00:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>No, nobody gets saved by being baptizing the water.

42
00:01:43.879 --> 00:01:46.799
<v Speaker 3>That's your Yeah, please keep asserting the Protestant doctrine, which

43
00:01:46.799 --> 00:01:49.040
<v Speaker 3>is what I'm challenging, which you said it is water

44
00:01:49.079 --> 00:01:51.239
<v Speaker 3>baptism in actually thirty eight and thirty nine, and he

45
00:01:51.319 --> 00:01:53.200
<v Speaker 3>says that that is the remission of sentence.

46
00:01:53.799 --> 00:01:56.000
<v Speaker 2>But listen, when I became a believer, I.

47
00:01:56.560 --> 00:01:59.359
<v Speaker 3>This is your subjective interpretation. I don't. It doesn't matter

48
00:01:59.519 --> 00:02:01.359
<v Speaker 3>what you your personal experience was.

49
00:02:01.840 --> 00:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm telling you right now there are tens of

50
00:02:04.879 --> 00:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>thousands of Iranians who have become believers in Jesus and

51
00:02:08.120 --> 00:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>they are not able to get baptized because in Iran

52
00:02:11.000 --> 00:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>there's not possibility to get arrested or but they love

53
00:02:14.159 --> 00:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the Lord and they're not even baptizing, but they're born again.

54
00:02:16.439 --> 00:02:17.560
<v Speaker 2>They're full of the Holy space.

55
00:02:17.800 --> 00:02:20.039
<v Speaker 3>Let's just lag in the question that I mean. They

56
00:02:20.120 --> 00:02:22.240
<v Speaker 3>may be in God's mind and that's fine, but the

57
00:02:22.280 --> 00:02:25.039
<v Speaker 3>normative means by which we do this is said to

58
00:02:25.080 --> 00:02:28.280
<v Speaker 3>be multiple times throughout the New Testament, actual baptism. So

59
00:02:28.319 --> 00:02:30.680
<v Speaker 3>you're just assuming Protestantism, which is the very thing that

60
00:02:30.719 --> 00:02:33.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm questioning about. So how do you prove Protestantism to me?

61
00:02:34.520 --> 00:02:38.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, as I said, I'm not a Protestant, was a basically.

62
00:02:38.280 --> 00:02:41.319
<v Speaker 3>You are a Protestant. Why are you acting like you're not? Okay, evangelical?

63
00:02:41.360 --> 00:02:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Is that better?

64
00:02:42.639 --> 00:02:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

65
00:02:43.039 --> 00:02:47.759
<v Speaker 1>So basically, what happened with the Protestantism Martin Luther. It

66
00:02:47.840 --> 00:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>was a protest against Catholic system of you know, justification

67
00:02:52.400 --> 00:02:56.599
<v Speaker 1>by works and punaware on faith plus works. And what

68
00:02:56.719 --> 00:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>all Protestant was was, no, we're justified again.

69
00:03:00.520 --> 00:03:02.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't need to I know the history of the

70
00:03:02.039 --> 00:03:03.800
<v Speaker 3>pros and Reformation. I'm not trying to be rude to you,

71
00:03:03.960 --> 00:03:07.159
<v Speaker 3>but I'm asking you about evangelicalism, which is what you're

72
00:03:07.199 --> 00:03:15.080
<v Speaker 3>part of, and I'm asking you why should we accept evangelicalism.

73
00:03:12.599 --> 00:03:15.039
<v Speaker 2>Again, It's not evangelicalism.

74
00:03:15.159 --> 00:03:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Or being dishonest because you just admitted that you weren't

75
00:03:17.560 --> 00:03:19.039
<v Speaker 3>evangelical like two minutes ago.

76
00:03:19.759 --> 00:03:21.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, evangelical What is evangelical?

77
00:03:21.680 --> 00:03:22.199
<v Speaker 2>The Christians.

78
00:03:22.560 --> 00:03:24.319
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to argue with you over terms. Where

79
00:03:24.360 --> 00:03:25.439
<v Speaker 3>do you get your Bible from?

80
00:03:26.919 --> 00:03:28.120
<v Speaker 2>What do we? What are we?

81
00:03:28.599 --> 00:03:30.159
<v Speaker 3>Where do you get the Bible from? Did it just

82
00:03:30.599 --> 00:03:32.080
<v Speaker 3>fall out of the air into Iran?

83
00:03:34.360 --> 00:03:37.520
<v Speaker 2>No? I actually you run is illegal to a Bible.

84
00:03:37.639 --> 00:03:39.479
<v Speaker 2>So I don't live in your own now.

85
00:03:39.479 --> 00:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I live in Israel. But when I when I became

86
00:03:43.000 --> 00:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>believer it, I started for a Bible for three months.

87
00:03:45.879 --> 00:03:46.439
<v Speaker 3>We're moving on.

88
00:03:47.240 --> 00:03:51.439
<v Speaker 4>So you made a video a while bag talking about

89
00:03:51.520 --> 00:03:54.560
<v Speaker 4>Protestism and criticizing them a bit, and this open debate,

90
00:03:54.560 --> 00:03:56.560
<v Speaker 4>perform plat format you do.

91
00:03:56.719 --> 00:03:58.120
<v Speaker 2>And three issues you said you.

92
00:03:58.080 --> 00:04:01.800
<v Speaker 4>Stayed with it was it was a historical, it was

93
00:04:01.879 --> 00:04:05.719
<v Speaker 4>anti sacramental, anti mystical, and.

94
00:04:05.759 --> 00:04:06.719
<v Speaker 2>Just flat out done.

95
00:04:07.080 --> 00:04:10.759
<v Speaker 4>Yes, the problem that I have with that is specifically

96
00:04:10.840 --> 00:04:14.680
<v Speaker 4>a historical and the issues I have with that is

97
00:04:14.840 --> 00:04:17.279
<v Speaker 4>and some of the issues you gave for why protestant

98
00:04:17.319 --> 00:04:22.360
<v Speaker 4>is antihistorical was they don't follow the liturgical warship properly,

99
00:04:22.439 --> 00:04:25.519
<v Speaker 4>They don't do certain customs and traditions that were practiced

100
00:04:25.519 --> 00:04:28.759
<v Speaker 4>by the early Church, and don't have the exact same

101
00:04:28.759 --> 00:04:31.800
<v Speaker 4>pieces of scripture or some example.

102
00:04:31.959 --> 00:04:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Those are some examples. There could be many more listed

103
00:04:34.199 --> 00:04:34.560
<v Speaker 3>for sure.

104
00:04:37.199 --> 00:04:41.160
<v Speaker 4>And the issue I have with that, if Protestantism.

105
00:04:40.720 --> 00:04:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Is a historical by those standards, I would say, so

106
00:04:44.000 --> 00:04:44.800
<v Speaker 2>is Orthodoxy.

107
00:04:45.720 --> 00:04:46.279
<v Speaker 3>And how is that.

108
00:04:48.319 --> 00:04:54.279
<v Speaker 4>Well for starters Constantinople fell in fourteen fifty three.

109
00:04:54.480 --> 00:04:56.399
<v Speaker 3>You can't be serious that this is an argument that

110
00:04:56.439 --> 00:05:00.319
<v Speaker 3>you think this is an arguments the start of one. Yeah,

111
00:05:01.480 --> 00:05:05.160
<v Speaker 3>what does this have to do with the theology. This

112
00:05:05.759 --> 00:05:07.600
<v Speaker 3>is why I block this guy, because this is too

113
00:05:08.079 --> 00:05:14.720
<v Speaker 3>too dumb. I mean, are you the synoticon of Orthodoxy?

114
00:05:15.360 --> 00:05:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

115
00:05:15.759 --> 00:05:19.199
<v Speaker 4>Because I believe in the Sonoticon of Orthodoxy, in one

116
00:05:19.199 --> 00:05:22.079
<v Speaker 4>of the statements you give Thanksgiving, and that is the

117
00:05:22.079 --> 00:05:24.920
<v Speaker 4>glorification and of the defenders of Orthodoxy.

118
00:05:25.000 --> 00:05:29.199
<v Speaker 3>Might not mistaken, probably I don't remember. It's a giant text.

119
00:05:30.839 --> 00:05:34.839
<v Speaker 4>It's a giant text that's different among different branches of Orthodoxy.

120
00:05:34.399 --> 00:05:38.160
<v Speaker 3>Right because different bishops can add their own personal For example,

121
00:05:38.240 --> 00:05:41.639
<v Speaker 3>Metropolitan saraphim A Preas adds the Joe's witnesses to the

122
00:05:41.720 --> 00:05:42.839
<v Speaker 3>condemnation texture.

123
00:05:45.439 --> 00:05:47.720
<v Speaker 4>And the problem I have with that is the statement

124
00:05:47.759 --> 00:05:51.439
<v Speaker 4>of the defender of Orthodoxy, which originally within the Church.

125
00:05:51.759 --> 00:05:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Was the Holy Roman Emperor.

126
00:05:53.800 --> 00:05:58.399
<v Speaker 4>As was stated by Anthony, Patriarch of Constantinople in thirteen

127
00:05:58.480 --> 00:06:01.920
<v Speaker 4>ninety three to a letter of to letter to Basle

128
00:06:01.959 --> 00:06:06.240
<v Speaker 4>the First, the Grand Prince of Moscow, saying, my son,

129
00:06:06.480 --> 00:06:09.120
<v Speaker 4>it is not possible for Christians to have a church

130
00:06:09.279 --> 00:06:12.079
<v Speaker 4>and not have an emperor. Church and Empire have a

131
00:06:12.120 --> 00:06:15.439
<v Speaker 4>great unity and community. It is not possible for them

132
00:06:15.480 --> 00:06:18.079
<v Speaker 4>to be separated from one another. For the Holy Emperor

133
00:06:18.160 --> 00:06:21.519
<v Speaker 4>is not as other rulers and the governors of other regions.

134
00:06:22.160 --> 00:06:25.399
<v Speaker 2>And this is because the Emperor is from the.

135
00:06:25.439 --> 00:06:31.040
<v Speaker 4>Beginning establish and confirmed true religion Eustia in all inhabited

136
00:06:31.079 --> 00:06:33.800
<v Speaker 4>world okiomenia, they convolse.

137
00:06:36.279 --> 00:06:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know how to pronounce.

138
00:06:37.360 --> 00:06:42.800
<v Speaker 3>The word, obviously, And so orthodoxy is false because Byzantium fell,

139
00:06:44.480 --> 00:06:44.959
<v Speaker 3>I mean.

140
00:06:44.879 --> 00:06:46.959
<v Speaker 4>It's not just that Bonancium fell.

141
00:06:47.839 --> 00:06:48.199
<v Speaker 2>Puppet.

142
00:06:49.680 --> 00:06:53.439
<v Speaker 3>Now we see why I booted this guy, and I

143
00:06:53.600 --> 00:06:55.839
<v Speaker 3>was right to boot that guy. This is too stupid

144
00:06:55.920 --> 00:07:02.160
<v Speaker 3>to even entertain. So, guys, I know you want entertainment,

145
00:07:02.319 --> 00:07:07.120
<v Speaker 3>but when you asked me to bring back Banantium and

146
00:07:07.199 --> 00:07:11.519
<v Speaker 3>these kinds of goofballs, it's usually because they're booted for

147
00:07:11.560 --> 00:07:14.480
<v Speaker 3>a reason. So let's get on my banana phone and

148
00:07:14.560 --> 00:07:18.519
<v Speaker 3>let's call up Banantium and let's talk to the Bananantine

149
00:07:18.519 --> 00:07:22.879
<v Speaker 3>emperor and see if we can get any history about

150
00:07:23.079 --> 00:07:26.360
<v Speaker 3>why he's not ruling on an earthly throne to help

151
00:07:26.720 --> 00:07:32.319
<v Speaker 3>ensure Banantium. Hello, Hello, Can anyone else call in the

152
00:07:32.319 --> 00:07:36.600
<v Speaker 3>banana phone and see if they can get the Bananantine Emperor? Hello?

153
00:07:36.920 --> 00:07:40.720
<v Speaker 3>I just hear monkey is chirping. I think I called

154
00:07:40.759 --> 00:07:43.839
<v Speaker 3>the Matt Dila Monkey line accidentally. I got Mount Dila

155
00:07:43.879 --> 00:07:45.079
<v Speaker 3>Monkey on speed dial.

156
00:07:46.680 --> 00:07:51.319
<v Speaker 5>Does the Eastern or the Church think that Saint Augustine

157
00:07:51.360 --> 00:07:52.000
<v Speaker 5>is a saint?

158
00:07:52.759 --> 00:07:55.439
<v Speaker 3>Yes, he's called a saint of the Fifth Act Medical Council.

159
00:07:56.839 --> 00:07:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, did the old heresies.

160
00:07:59.480 --> 00:08:02.920
<v Speaker 3>He held to errors? An error is not necessarily heresy.

161
00:08:03.319 --> 00:08:06.199
<v Speaker 3>Every church father, in some way has some error that

162
00:08:06.199 --> 00:08:07.439
<v Speaker 3>doesn't make them all heretics.

163
00:08:08.600 --> 00:08:12.920
<v Speaker 5>Okay, So the philioque absolute divine simplicity or in heresies.

164
00:08:13.560 --> 00:08:16.040
<v Speaker 3>A heresy is something that's declared to heresy by the

165
00:08:16.120 --> 00:08:20.120
<v Speaker 3>Church eventually in a council. Augustine didn't believe anything erroneous

166
00:08:20.160 --> 00:08:22.279
<v Speaker 3>at his time that he knew was a heresy, so

167
00:08:22.439 --> 00:08:24.879
<v Speaker 3>I philioquay is not condemned until the Middle Ages.

168
00:08:25.800 --> 00:08:30.399
<v Speaker 5>Okay, So before the nice and kind of the Nicean Council,

169
00:08:30.560 --> 00:08:32.879
<v Speaker 5>if someone held that Jesus was in God or go

170
00:08:33.000 --> 00:08:36.200
<v Speaker 5>substantial with the Father, then they were inhertics, right according.

171
00:08:35.919 --> 00:08:39.240
<v Speaker 3>To that law. No, No, because some errors are significant

172
00:08:39.320 --> 00:08:43.480
<v Speaker 3>enough that the person that holds them. It's the attitude

173
00:08:43.559 --> 00:08:45.960
<v Speaker 3>that they have and the humility that they have. So

174
00:08:46.000 --> 00:08:48.879
<v Speaker 3>for example, when Augustine writes on the Trinity, he says,

175
00:08:48.879 --> 00:08:52.200
<v Speaker 3>in book three, I am speculating, and I give these

176
00:08:52.240 --> 00:08:55.799
<v Speaker 3>books to the judgment of the Universal Church, and if

177
00:08:55.799 --> 00:08:58.799
<v Speaker 3>there's anything wrong in them, they can be rejected. So

178
00:08:58.840 --> 00:09:00.960
<v Speaker 3>that's the attitude of humility to you. That, for example,

179
00:09:01.159 --> 00:09:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Origin didn't have. Origin was obstinate to the end of

180
00:09:04.720 --> 00:09:07.279
<v Speaker 3>his life in his heresies, and he did not submit

181
00:09:07.320 --> 00:09:09.320
<v Speaker 3>to the judgment of the Church, whereas Augustine did so.

182
00:09:09.320 --> 00:09:13.679
<v Speaker 3>Augustine's humility is what covers the theological speculations and mistakes

183
00:09:13.679 --> 00:09:15.639
<v Speaker 3>that he had, whereas for the people that you're talking about,

184
00:09:15.720 --> 00:09:16.279
<v Speaker 3>it's different.

185
00:09:17.320 --> 00:09:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, gotcha.

186
00:09:18.919 --> 00:09:22.679
<v Speaker 5>Was he later corrected though by other bishops and other theologians.

187
00:09:23.279 --> 00:09:26.039
<v Speaker 3>If he hands his book to the Church for judgment,

188
00:09:26.399 --> 00:09:29.320
<v Speaker 3>and Church that doesn't mean that it happens overnight, if

189
00:09:29.320 --> 00:09:32.399
<v Speaker 3>the Church doesn't in his lifetime judge it, but the

190
00:09:32.480 --> 00:09:34.919
<v Speaker 3>Church judges by the time of the Fifth Acumenical Council

191
00:09:34.960 --> 00:09:37.120
<v Speaker 3>that he's a saint. And by the way, do you

192
00:09:37.159 --> 00:09:39.879
<v Speaker 3>know what book the Fifth Actumdical Council lists as his

193
00:09:40.840 --> 00:09:45.000
<v Speaker 3>pre eminent theological work. No, okay, it's none of those books.

194
00:09:45.519 --> 00:09:48.360
<v Speaker 3>It's against the Manicheans, so it's not on the Trinity

195
00:09:48.960 --> 00:09:50.600
<v Speaker 3>or See of God or any of these other works.

196
00:09:52.120 --> 00:09:55.039
<v Speaker 2>Okay, gotcha, that was my question. Thank you, all right.

197
00:09:55.080 --> 00:09:57.840
<v Speaker 3>So, heresy is a sin of will and obstinacy, not

198
00:09:58.000 --> 00:10:01.759
<v Speaker 3>just a sin of mistake or error, and not even

199
00:10:01.879 --> 00:10:05.080
<v Speaker 3>Roman Catholics believe that he got everything right. They think

200
00:10:05.120 --> 00:10:08.279
<v Speaker 3>he made all kinds of theological mistakes, which would mean

201
00:10:08.279 --> 00:10:11.240
<v Speaker 3>that Roman Catholicism is false if that's the criteria. Because

202
00:10:11.519 --> 00:10:16.200
<v Speaker 3>Augustine taught a pretty strict doctrine predestination that the Roman

203
00:10:16.200 --> 00:10:18.960
<v Speaker 3>cally Church eventually doesn't adhere to. So if that's the case,

204
00:10:19.080 --> 00:10:22.039
<v Speaker 3>then the Roman Catholic system he's also a heretic. But

205
00:10:22.039 --> 00:10:28.399
<v Speaker 3>pretty much everybody has a degree of flexibility for saints

206
00:10:28.399 --> 00:10:32.519
<v Speaker 3>in the church, because no saint got everything as an

207
00:10:32.559 --> 00:10:35.200
<v Speaker 3>individual saint correct. Many of them got all kinds of

208
00:10:35.200 --> 00:10:37.879
<v Speaker 3>things wrong. Many of them got the canon of Scripture wrong,

209
00:10:37.879 --> 00:10:40.159
<v Speaker 3>and that's an important thing, But it doesn't make them

210
00:10:40.159 --> 00:10:43.000
<v Speaker 3>all heretics because they made a mistake. Making mistake is

211
00:10:43.039 --> 00:10:46.440
<v Speaker 3>not the essence of a heresy. Obstinacy and pride is

212
00:10:46.440 --> 00:10:47.440
<v Speaker 3>the essence of heresy.

213
00:10:49.159 --> 00:10:54.279
<v Speaker 6>Just had a couple of questions, like about Eastern Orthodox relationships.

214
00:10:54.279 --> 00:10:58.559
<v Speaker 2>I guess to the Reforms, Okay, so.

215
00:10:58.559 --> 00:11:02.120
<v Speaker 6>I guess for starters, the main condemnation of the Reformed

216
00:11:02.159 --> 00:11:04.320
<v Speaker 6>would be their relationship to Roman Catholicism.

217
00:11:04.360 --> 00:11:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Correct, the Orthodox condemnation of the Reformed would be the

218
00:11:11.799 --> 00:11:14.000
<v Speaker 3>relation to Roman Catholicism. I don't know they even know

219
00:11:14.039 --> 00:11:14.600
<v Speaker 3>what that means.

220
00:11:15.159 --> 00:11:17.879
<v Speaker 2>Like I suppose I can qualify the question.

221
00:11:18.200 --> 00:11:19.960
<v Speaker 6>So the Reformed are going to try to make some

222
00:11:20.080 --> 00:11:26.919
<v Speaker 6>claim about their Apostolic succession, at least the High Reformed, right,

223
00:11:27.279 --> 00:11:29.960
<v Speaker 6>and they're going to trace that through Roman Catholicism. They're

224
00:11:29.960 --> 00:11:33.240
<v Speaker 6>not going to trace it through like either the East Split.

225
00:11:33.440 --> 00:11:35.639
<v Speaker 3>I've never heard of a Reform person who believes in

226
00:11:35.639 --> 00:11:37.759
<v Speaker 3>Apostolic succession, so I don't even know what that means.

227
00:11:38.080 --> 00:11:40.559
<v Speaker 6>Oh interesting, all right, maybe this is some niche view.

228
00:11:41.840 --> 00:11:43.360
<v Speaker 6>I guess the second question, I mean.

229
00:11:43.240 --> 00:11:47.679
<v Speaker 3>Maybe an Anglican Calvinist High Church Anglican Calvinists would try

230
00:11:47.679 --> 00:11:48.799
<v Speaker 3>to claim that's why.

231
00:11:49.039 --> 00:11:50.879
<v Speaker 6>I mean, yeah, yeah, I've heard that from High Church

232
00:11:50.960 --> 00:11:53.279
<v Speaker 6>Anglicans through Reformed Anglicans even, but I've heard it from

233
00:11:53.279 --> 00:11:55.759
<v Speaker 6>like OPC guys, right, Orthodox Presbyterians.

234
00:11:56.039 --> 00:11:56.080
<v Speaker 2>No.

235
00:11:56.240 --> 00:11:58.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, well, I mean, if they want to redefine

236
00:11:58.480 --> 00:12:01.919
<v Speaker 3>what the word a succession means, then that's what they're doing.

237
00:12:01.960 --> 00:12:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Because there's no Protestants who are Classical Reformation Protestants that

238
00:12:06.039 --> 00:12:08.159
<v Speaker 3>believe that there's a transmission of the gift of the

239
00:12:08.159 --> 00:12:10.799
<v Speaker 3>Holy Spirit in the laying on of hands.

240
00:12:11.720 --> 00:12:13.320
<v Speaker 6>Kind of in the same way that a Lutheran is

241
00:12:13.360 --> 00:12:16.279
<v Speaker 6>going to argue for the historicity and apolasticity of the

242
00:12:16.360 --> 00:12:17.000
<v Speaker 6>Lutheran Church.

243
00:12:17.279 --> 00:12:19.720
<v Speaker 3>But that's not what I just said.

244
00:12:19.639 --> 00:12:22.039
<v Speaker 2>Right, No, I'm recognizing the distinction.

245
00:12:22.720 --> 00:12:25.919
<v Speaker 3>Then it's not apostolic accession. It's redefining the terms to

246
00:12:26.039 --> 00:12:30.320
<v Speaker 3>make Protestantism and continuity with some made up traditions, just

247
00:12:30.320 --> 00:12:33.840
<v Speaker 3>like they do the same thing with Niceno Constantapolitan Creed,

248
00:12:33.840 --> 00:12:36.759
<v Speaker 3>where it says one Holy Catholic Apostolic and they redefine

249
00:12:36.759 --> 00:12:37.919
<v Speaker 3>that to me an the invisible Church.

250
00:12:38.320 --> 00:12:40.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'll just can see that. It's like redefining No

251
00:12:41.000 --> 00:12:43.240
<v Speaker 2>problem there. So the second question would be.

252
00:12:44.679 --> 00:12:47.559
<v Speaker 6>I've seen maybe I obviously need to read more about

253
00:12:47.600 --> 00:12:50.799
<v Speaker 6>Eastern Orthodox resources on the sovereignty of God, but it

254
00:12:50.799 --> 00:12:53.759
<v Speaker 6>seems to me that like certain historic views within the

255
00:12:53.840 --> 00:12:59.039
<v Speaker 6>Eastern Orthodox can be consistent with like maybe four point

256
00:12:59.279 --> 00:13:03.559
<v Speaker 6>or three point five, you know, tool of affirming Calvinists.

257
00:13:03.600 --> 00:13:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Do you agree or disagree? No?

258
00:13:06.519 --> 00:13:08.960
<v Speaker 6>Okay, which of the points, like, do you flat out

259
00:13:09.000 --> 00:13:11.159
<v Speaker 6>reject on all of them?

260
00:13:11.360 --> 00:13:11.919
<v Speaker 2>Fair enough?

261
00:13:12.840 --> 00:13:14.320
<v Speaker 6>All right, I'm not gonna take up too much time

262
00:13:14.360 --> 00:13:16.120
<v Speaker 6>if you ever want to have like a formal debate.

263
00:13:16.720 --> 00:13:17.120
<v Speaker 7>I DM.

264
00:13:17.200 --> 00:13:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Do you so? Thanks for the space?

265
00:13:18.679 --> 00:13:19.639
<v Speaker 3>Well how about right now?

266
00:13:20.519 --> 00:13:22.399
<v Speaker 2>No with me, I'm not good enough of this. I

267
00:13:22.600 --> 00:13:24.200
<v Speaker 2>have other people that I can talk to you or

268
00:13:24.200 --> 00:13:28.480
<v Speaker 2>link you up again I do. I mean what their names?

269
00:13:28.879 --> 00:13:29.039
<v Speaker 2>Is it?

270
00:13:29.120 --> 00:13:31.919
<v Speaker 3>Somebody with an audience over a few hundred followers?

271
00:13:32.440 --> 00:13:35.279
<v Speaker 2>Uh? Yeah, a couple of them. Jonathan Speaks would be

272
00:13:35.320 --> 00:13:35.720
<v Speaker 2>one of them.

273
00:13:36.039 --> 00:13:37.720
<v Speaker 3>And how big is his audience.

274
00:13:38.159 --> 00:13:40.960
<v Speaker 6>I'd probably guess around five six hundred?

275
00:13:42.799 --> 00:13:45.240
<v Speaker 2>No, thanks, thanks for your time.

276
00:13:47.480 --> 00:13:51.919
<v Speaker 3>Again. The Twitter spaces are for four or five hundred

277
00:13:52.000 --> 00:13:55.320
<v Speaker 3>two three five thousand. I'm not doing any formal debates

278
00:13:55.399 --> 00:13:58.360
<v Speaker 3>unless you have a large following. I didn't work my

279
00:13:58.440 --> 00:14:03.559
<v Speaker 3>butt off debating a thousand goobers to debate all the

280
00:14:03.600 --> 00:14:06.360
<v Speaker 3>top atheists and Muslims, to spend all my time debating

281
00:14:06.360 --> 00:14:09.240
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of five hundred follower people who want to

282
00:14:09.399 --> 00:14:12.840
<v Speaker 3>chase clout and grow their audience. So that's why you

283
00:14:12.919 --> 00:14:15.440
<v Speaker 3>get the Twitter space and they don't come here because

284
00:14:15.480 --> 00:14:31.440
<v Speaker 3>all they want is a big audience. Jud are you there?

285
00:14:31.600 --> 00:14:31.799
<v Speaker 8>Yeah?

286
00:14:31.840 --> 00:14:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I can hear you. It's real quiet, can you hear me?

287
00:14:35.840 --> 00:14:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

288
00:14:38.519 --> 00:14:41.120
<v Speaker 9>Hey, I don't know why your volume is super long

289
00:14:41.120 --> 00:14:43.919
<v Speaker 9>on my phone, but I'm here, Okay.

290
00:14:43.960 --> 00:14:44.919
<v Speaker 2>I had a question for you.

291
00:14:45.639 --> 00:14:49.919
<v Speaker 9>So I'm a Protestant, I'm an Evangelical and I've been

292
00:14:50.000 --> 00:14:53.919
<v Speaker 9>inquiring it too Orthodoxy and it's really fascinating stuff.

293
00:14:54.120 --> 00:14:55.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to learn as much as I can.

294
00:14:55.840 --> 00:14:57.919
<v Speaker 9>The thing that I am having a hard time really

295
00:14:58.000 --> 00:15:03.159
<v Speaker 9>understanding is your guys view on christ sacrifice and it

296
00:15:03.240 --> 00:15:06.559
<v Speaker 9>comes to the shedding of blood and the Old Testament

297
00:15:06.639 --> 00:15:09.879
<v Speaker 9>sacrificial system. You know, that's really deep be ingrained in

298
00:15:10.559 --> 00:15:12.519
<v Speaker 9>Protestant view of salvation and.

299
00:15:12.759 --> 00:15:16.120
<v Speaker 3>Literally, so what I'm gonna say is, I'm gonna what

300
00:15:16.159 --> 00:15:19.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna say is go watch the video Protestant Penal

301
00:15:19.639 --> 00:15:22.919
<v Speaker 3>Substitution Jay Dyer. So we've literally covered this probably five

302
00:15:23.000 --> 00:15:26.240
<v Speaker 3>hundred times. It comes up in every open space. So

303
00:15:26.440 --> 00:15:29.960
<v Speaker 3>if you look at my clips channel, you'll find multiple

304
00:15:29.960 --> 00:15:35.879
<v Speaker 3>things on PSA. I try to be rude. I'm just like,

305
00:15:37.720 --> 00:15:40.960
<v Speaker 3>it's like probably a thousand times we've responded to that.

306
00:15:43.879 --> 00:15:49.360
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, hello, yep.

307
00:15:50.440 --> 00:15:54.919
<v Speaker 10>Hey, So also Protestant here, very disgruntled Protestant.

308
00:15:55.080 --> 00:15:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

309
00:15:55.720 --> 00:15:58.480
<v Speaker 10>I would like to go east Orthodoxy, but my wife

310
00:15:59.720 --> 00:16:05.000
<v Speaker 10>has voice and concerns about y'all's mariology of Holy and

311
00:16:06.039 --> 00:16:09.639
<v Speaker 10>do y'all see her as totally sinless, like she has.

312
00:16:09.600 --> 00:16:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Never once in her life?

313
00:16:11.639 --> 00:16:16.039
<v Speaker 10>Or is that she is the most pure, most blessed

314
00:16:16.080 --> 00:16:18.679
<v Speaker 10>and and like, I get all that part, but y'all

315
00:16:18.799 --> 00:16:21.279
<v Speaker 10>can make the contention that she's never sinned ever.

316
00:16:21.720 --> 00:16:24.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, she's a spatless virgin and God's grace preserved her

317
00:16:24.679 --> 00:16:25.279
<v Speaker 3>from sinning.

318
00:16:27.200 --> 00:16:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Gotcha. And so that would be a.

319
00:16:31.120 --> 00:16:33.799
<v Speaker 10>Stumbling block for my wife is that she would not

320
00:16:33.919 --> 00:16:39.240
<v Speaker 10>be comfortable saying that Mary only is sinless.

321
00:16:39.720 --> 00:16:41.240
<v Speaker 2>She would say that she's most.

322
00:16:41.080 --> 00:16:44.039
<v Speaker 10>Pure if that's fine, but she would have the issue

323
00:16:44.080 --> 00:16:45.679
<v Speaker 10>of making the jumpsy sinless.

324
00:16:45.879 --> 00:16:49.559
<v Speaker 2>What do you what do you recommend?

325
00:16:49.879 --> 00:16:52.799
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I made a whole video on the importance

326
00:16:52.840 --> 00:16:54.960
<v Speaker 3>of Mary, and I would say that, you know, I

327
00:16:55.320 --> 00:17:00.440
<v Speaker 3>like if if all the other doctrines are true an Orthodox, see,

328
00:17:00.559 --> 00:17:02.759
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't make any sense to say, but I'm not

329
00:17:02.799 --> 00:17:04.599
<v Speaker 3>going to submit to this one that I don't like

330
00:17:04.720 --> 00:17:08.160
<v Speaker 3>or disagree with, like if it's a package deal. So

331
00:17:10.440 --> 00:17:13.319
<v Speaker 3>to me, it's perfectly befitting that if she's the new Eve,

332
00:17:13.559 --> 00:17:17.440
<v Speaker 3>she would be like Eve, and instead of being a

333
00:17:17.519 --> 00:17:21.759
<v Speaker 3>fallen creature in the sense of actual sin, she would

334
00:17:21.839 --> 00:17:27.799
<v Speaker 3>be preserved from that like Eve would have been had

335
00:17:27.880 --> 00:17:31.720
<v Speaker 3>she not sinned. So I think it's a consequence of

336
00:17:31.720 --> 00:17:34.480
<v Speaker 3>her as the mother of God, that she was preserved

337
00:17:34.480 --> 00:17:39.440
<v Speaker 3>from that so that she could be in that intimate,

338
00:17:39.519 --> 00:17:42.680
<v Speaker 3>special role of being the one that gave birth to

339
00:17:42.839 --> 00:17:45.799
<v Speaker 3>the Son of God and gave to him his human

340
00:17:45.880 --> 00:17:50.359
<v Speaker 3>nature and so forth. But if we think about sin

341
00:17:50.599 --> 00:17:54.119
<v Speaker 3>as a specific act and not as a state of being,

342
00:17:54.319 --> 00:17:56.839
<v Speaker 3>as most Calvinists and reform people do. They think of

343
00:17:56.880 --> 00:18:00.880
<v Speaker 3>sin as a state of being. It's not find is James,

344
00:18:01.160 --> 00:18:03.079
<v Speaker 3>excuse me by James, as an action of the will.

345
00:18:04.000 --> 00:18:07.680
<v Speaker 3>That's another reason why infants aren't quote sinners, because infants

346
00:18:07.720 --> 00:18:11.200
<v Speaker 3>don't commit actual sins. They don't commit sins of the will.

347
00:18:12.480 --> 00:18:14.160
<v Speaker 3>The only sense in which an infant is a quote

348
00:18:14.200 --> 00:18:17.039
<v Speaker 3>center is that they are deprived of the grace of

349
00:18:17.559 --> 00:18:20.240
<v Speaker 3>Eden and they are fallen, and so they feel the

350
00:18:20.240 --> 00:18:23.799
<v Speaker 3>effects of the sin. And sometimes Paul speaks of that

351
00:18:23.880 --> 00:18:27.279
<v Speaker 3>whole class of human beings under the descent of Adam

352
00:18:27.400 --> 00:18:31.240
<v Speaker 3>as in sin. That does not equate to them being

353
00:18:31.440 --> 00:18:35.599
<v Speaker 3>actual sinners. It equates to them having the effects of sin.

354
00:18:36.640 --> 00:18:41.680
<v Speaker 3>So this is and literally no one believes this anymore,

355
00:18:42.160 --> 00:18:45.519
<v Speaker 3>that infants are damned except Calvinists. Roman Catholics don't believe

356
00:18:45.519 --> 00:18:50.039
<v Speaker 3>that infants are have inherited guilt. Maybe Lutherans do, I'm

357
00:18:50.039 --> 00:18:52.519
<v Speaker 3>not sure, but there's literally no one else that believes

358
00:18:52.519 --> 00:18:55.039
<v Speaker 3>this except for Calvinists. So you're not gonna be Orthodox

359
00:18:55.160 --> 00:18:58.079
<v Speaker 3>or Catholic if you believe that infants have actual sin,

360
00:18:58.119 --> 00:18:59.920
<v Speaker 3>which is kind of stupid if you think about it.

361
00:19:00.640 --> 00:19:04.599
<v Speaker 2>My first point is when we look at Jesus, did

362
00:19:04.640 --> 00:19:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Jesus use tradition in the way that you would envision

363
00:19:08.960 --> 00:19:11.319
<v Speaker 2>it in your definition of tradition?

364
00:19:11.880 --> 00:19:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Yes? Could you show us that well, he specifically.

365
00:19:18.519 --> 00:19:21.559
<v Speaker 2>Could you give us the Eastern Orthodox definition and then show.

366
00:19:21.400 --> 00:19:24.640
<v Speaker 3>Us he specifically said that the Word of God was

367
00:19:24.799 --> 00:19:27.559
<v Speaker 3>himself and not the books to the Pharisees.

368
00:19:29.799 --> 00:19:32.559
<v Speaker 2>No, you're not listening to me.

369
00:19:32.799 --> 00:19:35.920
<v Speaker 11>Right here we go, I'm asking you to give me

370
00:19:36.039 --> 00:19:37.920
<v Speaker 11>the definition of Eastern Orthodox.

371
00:19:37.920 --> 00:19:39.119
<v Speaker 2>You understanding of tradition?

372
00:19:39.240 --> 00:19:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's the full revelation, whether containing the written text

373
00:19:42.640 --> 00:19:47.759
<v Speaker 3>or the oral preaching of the apostles. How's that okay?

374
00:19:47.519 --> 00:19:49.960
<v Speaker 3>The faith once we're all committed to the saints.

375
00:19:52.039 --> 00:19:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I think you're still don't give it a.

376
00:19:54.079 --> 00:19:57.119
<v Speaker 3>Full definition, right, and so you go make more YouTube videos.

377
00:19:58.119 --> 00:20:04.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to know your thoughts are fully ocal. Okay,

378
00:20:05.039 --> 00:20:10.599
<v Speaker 2>go ahead, yeah, so yeah, so do you what's the

379
00:20:10.759 --> 00:20:11.839
<v Speaker 2>Orthodox position? Do y'all?

380
00:20:11.960 --> 00:20:15.799
<v Speaker 12>Do y'all deny that there's any procession of the Holy

381
00:20:15.839 --> 00:20:16.680
<v Speaker 12>Spirit through the Sun.

382
00:20:18.599 --> 00:20:21.519
<v Speaker 3>No, there is a procession through the sun, but it

383
00:20:21.599 --> 00:20:24.200
<v Speaker 3>is not his existential hypostatic origin.

384
00:20:25.759 --> 00:20:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

385
00:20:26.200 --> 00:20:30.359
<v Speaker 12>But if it's the case that the Holy Spirit, if

386
00:20:30.680 --> 00:20:36.480
<v Speaker 12>it's the case that the Holy Spirit proceeds through the sun, right,

387
00:20:36.519 --> 00:20:40.559
<v Speaker 12>then then what really is any difference between the Orthodox

388
00:20:40.640 --> 00:20:42.720
<v Speaker 12>position of philioko are.

389
00:20:42.559 --> 00:20:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Not because that's not the position that's laid out of

390
00:20:45.240 --> 00:20:48.079
<v Speaker 3>the Council of Lions in Florence. That position says that

391
00:20:48.279 --> 00:20:51.759
<v Speaker 3>there's a double eternal hyposthetic principle from the Father and

392
00:20:51.880 --> 00:20:55.200
<v Speaker 3>the Son, who function as a single principle of the

393
00:20:55.200 --> 00:20:56.839
<v Speaker 3>origin of the Holy Spirit. And that's something that we

394
00:20:56.880 --> 00:20:59.279
<v Speaker 3>can never accept because it gets to the sun, the

395
00:20:59.400 --> 00:21:01.680
<v Speaker 3>unique property that identifies the Father.

396
00:21:02.960 --> 00:21:04.720
<v Speaker 12>Well, you would you would agree that there's going to

397
00:21:04.759 --> 00:21:08.000
<v Speaker 12>be a distinction between being begonton and being preceded.

398
00:21:08.079 --> 00:21:11.599
<v Speaker 3>Right, that has nothing to do with what I just said.

399
00:21:13.400 --> 00:21:15.519
<v Speaker 12>Well, yes it does, because the Catholic like like you said,

400
00:21:15.519 --> 00:21:18.039
<v Speaker 12>the Catholic position is going to be that the Father

401
00:21:18.079 --> 00:21:20.200
<v Speaker 12>and the Son is the one principle that the Holy

402
00:21:20.200 --> 00:21:21.759
<v Speaker 12>Spirit spir rates from.

403
00:21:21.839 --> 00:21:24.440
<v Speaker 3>There's nothing that two persons in the Trinity share, as

404
00:21:24.440 --> 00:21:27.319
<v Speaker 3>the Cappadocians say that one lacks. And so you've created

405
00:21:27.359 --> 00:21:32.839
<v Speaker 3>a diad. So you reject you created because the Father

406
00:21:32.880 --> 00:21:37.039
<v Speaker 3>and the Son are a united principle of power and

407
00:21:37.119 --> 00:21:41.240
<v Speaker 3>causation that the Spirit does not have. So that's an imbalance,

408
00:21:41.359 --> 00:21:41.960
<v Speaker 3>that's a diad.

409
00:21:43.240 --> 00:21:46.599
<v Speaker 12>Well, but that but that's that's what distinguishes being forgotten

410
00:21:46.920 --> 00:21:48.799
<v Speaker 12>or the Son being forgotten, and the and the Spirit

411
00:21:48.880 --> 00:21:52.720
<v Speaker 12>being preceded. Right, because of the amount of people that

412
00:21:53.119 --> 00:21:56.119
<v Speaker 12>takes that that takes part are not the amount of

413
00:21:56.200 --> 00:22:00.480
<v Speaker 12>persons that take parts in preceding the Holy Spirit, at

414
00:22:00.599 --> 00:22:03.079
<v Speaker 12>least in the Catholic view, right, we can make the

415
00:22:03.119 --> 00:22:05.839
<v Speaker 12>case that the Holy Spirit truly is proceeded and not

416
00:22:06.000 --> 00:22:07.920
<v Speaker 12>just be gotten right from the Father.

417
00:22:09.000 --> 00:22:12.640
<v Speaker 3>So you're repeating Roman Catholic apologetic apologetics that doesn't even

418
00:22:12.680 --> 00:22:15.680
<v Speaker 3>address like the level of which we're talking about this question.

419
00:22:15.799 --> 00:22:17.720
<v Speaker 3>So can you repeat to me what my argument was?

420
00:22:19.000 --> 00:22:22.359
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, yeah, yeah, the argument was that, well, you pretty

421
00:22:22.400 --> 00:22:24.440
<v Speaker 12>much just laid out of our position. Then you said that, oh,

422
00:22:24.480 --> 00:22:26.799
<v Speaker 12>I've created a diead because it's going to be like

423
00:22:27.720 --> 00:22:31.559
<v Speaker 12>the two persons, the fathering son being the one principle

424
00:22:31.880 --> 00:22:37.480
<v Speaker 12>in which, right, the Holy Spirit pretty much originates from

425
00:22:37.559 --> 00:22:38.920
<v Speaker 12>or essence from that.

426
00:22:39.000 --> 00:22:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Is that your position?

427
00:22:39.720 --> 00:22:42.480
<v Speaker 3>And why is that a problem?

428
00:22:42.640 --> 00:22:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I don't see the problem.

429
00:22:44.440 --> 00:22:49.319
<v Speaker 3>Why did I Why did I say that's a problem.

430
00:22:49.400 --> 00:22:51.039
<v Speaker 12>Well, you said, you said those are problems because I

431
00:22:51.039 --> 00:22:53.039
<v Speaker 12>created a diead, right.

432
00:22:52.920 --> 00:22:56.000
<v Speaker 3>And why is that? I said specifically, there's a reason why.

433
00:22:57.119 --> 00:22:59.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because the father and the son is the one principle.

434
00:23:00.319 --> 00:23:02.759
<v Speaker 3>And why is that a problem?

435
00:23:03.880 --> 00:23:04.440
<v Speaker 2>You tell me?

436
00:23:04.759 --> 00:23:09.119
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I mean, I'm trying really hard to be patient

437
00:23:09.160 --> 00:23:12.839
<v Speaker 3>with you guys, but like I literally stated explicitly what

438
00:23:12.880 --> 00:23:15.519
<v Speaker 3>the problem is, and you've come with like level one

439
00:23:15.599 --> 00:23:17.359
<v Speaker 3>understanding and you want to debate it, which is fine.

440
00:23:17.400 --> 00:23:20.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't mind doing it. But did it ever occur

441
00:23:20.039 --> 00:23:22.359
<v Speaker 3>to you, Did it ever occur to you to maybe

442
00:23:22.480 --> 00:23:24.480
<v Speaker 3>read some of the arguments on this before you went

443
00:23:24.559 --> 00:23:25.400
<v Speaker 3>to debate it?

444
00:23:25.920 --> 00:23:28.960
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, yeah, I know, so I I but you.

445
00:23:28.880 --> 00:23:30.839
<v Speaker 3>Can't restate my argument, So you're not Are you not

446
00:23:30.920 --> 00:23:33.400
<v Speaker 3>listening to what I said or you just didn't catch it.

447
00:23:33.519 --> 00:23:34.720
<v Speaker 3>You want me stated again.

448
00:23:35.079 --> 00:23:37.799
<v Speaker 12>Well, will your position on the matter would be that

449
00:23:38.039 --> 00:23:39.440
<v Speaker 12>the father is the only principle?

450
00:23:39.519 --> 00:23:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Right?

451
00:23:40.000 --> 00:23:42.240
<v Speaker 3>And who said that? Anybody in church history?

452
00:23:43.680 --> 00:23:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean I'm asking you, do.

453
00:23:45.200 --> 00:23:47.519
<v Speaker 3>You know of any famous church fathers that were involved

454
00:23:47.559 --> 00:23:49.599
<v Speaker 3>in any ecumenical councils that maybe said that.

455
00:23:52.119 --> 00:23:57.200
<v Speaker 12>I know church fathers that believing Philly Opy. Do you, yeah, Augustine?

456
00:23:57.680 --> 00:24:02.279
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm? Do you accept that or do you deny that?

457
00:24:04.119 --> 00:24:07.319
<v Speaker 3>No? I mean I don't accept his teaching. No, it's wrong.

458
00:24:08.759 --> 00:24:11.759
<v Speaker 2>Oh oh so he does, so he does accept absolutely,

459
00:24:11.880 --> 00:24:13.680
<v Speaker 2>But he's a saint in your church.

460
00:24:14.319 --> 00:24:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Do you really think that these are owns that we

461
00:24:15.920 --> 00:24:18.880
<v Speaker 3>haven't addressed these arguments probably five hundred times. I mean.

462
00:24:20.920 --> 00:24:23.039
<v Speaker 12>No, I mean that's I know the copium that you

463
00:24:23.079 --> 00:24:23.599
<v Speaker 12>guys use.

464
00:24:25.079 --> 00:24:26.960
<v Speaker 3>So let's let's get into that. All right, you want

465
00:24:26.960 --> 00:24:30.000
<v Speaker 3>to do this, let's do it. What council confirmed the

466
00:24:30.000 --> 00:24:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Doctor of the Trinity for the Universal Church?

467
00:24:33.240 --> 00:24:34.440
<v Speaker 2>The council? Did I see that? No?

468
00:24:34.640 --> 00:24:36.279
<v Speaker 3>So you see, you don't even know the first of this.

469
00:24:36.480 --> 00:24:38.680
<v Speaker 3>You don't even know level one of this debate. It's

470
00:24:38.680 --> 00:24:41.000
<v Speaker 3>the second Ecaemical Council. Who are the three fathers that

471
00:24:41.079 --> 00:24:43.200
<v Speaker 3>are the most important of the second ecamical Council?

472
00:24:44.799 --> 00:24:46.680
<v Speaker 2>The second was the second?

473
00:24:47.480 --> 00:24:49.319
<v Speaker 3>So you don't know anything, and you're trying to debate.

474
00:24:50.039 --> 00:24:52.599
<v Speaker 12>Are you talking about what is all the go with

475
00:24:52.599 --> 00:24:53.440
<v Speaker 12>Philio boy?

476
00:24:53.720 --> 00:24:56.799
<v Speaker 3>Exactly? So you don't even know the Cappadocian doctrine of

477
00:24:56.839 --> 00:24:59.119
<v Speaker 3>the trinity that's outlined at constant double one.

478
00:25:01.920 --> 00:25:05.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I mean I is it like correct?

479
00:25:05.960 --> 00:25:06.160
<v Speaker 13>Yes?

480
00:25:06.319 --> 00:25:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

481
00:25:06.720 --> 00:25:13.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And that's not a filioquated doctrine because tell me

482
00:25:13.119 --> 00:25:14.599
<v Speaker 3>what the hypostatic property of the.

483
00:25:14.519 --> 00:25:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Father is the hypostatic property, So.

484
00:25:18.200 --> 00:25:20.759
<v Speaker 3>You don't even know the basic Cappadocian terms. You don't

485
00:25:20.759 --> 00:25:22.839
<v Speaker 3>even know our basic position, and you're trying to argue

486
00:25:22.839 --> 00:25:24.480
<v Speaker 3>with me and call it you call it code.

487
00:25:26.759 --> 00:25:31.240
<v Speaker 12>Tell you, yeah, the hyposthetic property of the father is

488
00:25:31.240 --> 00:25:34.720
<v Speaker 12>that he's the one that again he's he's the one principal.

489
00:25:35.640 --> 00:25:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh, he's the one principal. But you just said a

490
00:25:37.440 --> 00:25:39.279
<v Speaker 3>minute ago that you agree that the son is also

491
00:25:39.319 --> 00:25:41.440
<v Speaker 3>a co principal with him, so he's not the one principal.

492
00:25:42.240 --> 00:25:44.440
<v Speaker 3>How many principles are how many principles are there?

493
00:25:45.160 --> 00:25:46.000
<v Speaker 2>There's one principle?

494
00:25:46.200 --> 00:25:48.559
<v Speaker 3>No, you don't you believe there's one, And you contradicted

495
00:25:48.599 --> 00:25:50.359
<v Speaker 3>by saying that the father and the son together are

496
00:25:50.400 --> 00:25:51.599
<v Speaker 3>a principle that's two.

497
00:25:51.920 --> 00:25:53.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's that's the one principle. It's not gonna be

498
00:25:53.839 --> 00:25:54.519
<v Speaker 2>two principles.

499
00:25:54.559 --> 00:25:56.440
<v Speaker 3>You just said the father is the principal, and then

500
00:25:56.480 --> 00:25:58.079
<v Speaker 3>you said the father and the son are a principle.

501
00:25:58.119 --> 00:26:00.559
<v Speaker 3>That's two. Can you count the father?

502
00:26:00.640 --> 00:26:05.400
<v Speaker 2>And what do you this dowel argument?

503
00:26:05.519 --> 00:26:07.480
<v Speaker 3>Are you this dumb? You don't even know our position?

504
00:26:08.079 --> 00:26:11.200
<v Speaker 3>You said, you said the father is the principal, right.

505
00:26:13.160 --> 00:26:15.160
<v Speaker 2>The father and the son are the one principle.

506
00:26:15.720 --> 00:26:17.440
<v Speaker 3>At first you said the father is the principle. I

507
00:26:17.480 --> 00:26:19.359
<v Speaker 3>asked you his hypothetic property. You said it was to

508
00:26:19.400 --> 00:26:22.759
<v Speaker 3>be the principal. That's just hype. Well, yeah, you said that,

509
00:26:22.880 --> 00:26:24.799
<v Speaker 3>don't lie. You said that, Yeah I know.

510
00:26:24.880 --> 00:26:27.480
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, yeah, I understand that the mother is going to

511
00:26:27.480 --> 00:26:28.200
<v Speaker 12>be the principal.

512
00:26:28.440 --> 00:26:32.079
<v Speaker 3>Oh then there you go. Now you've contradicted because the

513
00:26:32.119 --> 00:26:34.759
<v Speaker 3>father and the son together are now a principal. That's

514
00:26:34.799 --> 00:26:37.039
<v Speaker 3>the problem. So that's two principles.

515
00:26:37.839 --> 00:26:39.759
<v Speaker 2>I never negated that the son is a principal.

516
00:26:41.880 --> 00:26:44.839
<v Speaker 3>If the father is the principal and the son also

517
00:26:44.880 --> 00:26:46.799
<v Speaker 3>with him, is also a principal, that's two.

518
00:26:47.599 --> 00:26:49.839
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't know, they're both the same principle.

519
00:26:50.200 --> 00:26:52.319
<v Speaker 3>Okay, now you're a modal Now you're a modalist because

520
00:26:52.359 --> 00:26:54.200
<v Speaker 3>now you've said the Father and the Son together are

521
00:26:54.240 --> 00:26:56.160
<v Speaker 3>a principle. That's modalism.

522
00:26:56.400 --> 00:26:57.599
<v Speaker 2>How does that follow.

523
00:26:57.759 --> 00:27:01.160
<v Speaker 3>Because that's the argument that the Gappatoians made against the Eunomians.

524
00:27:01.759 --> 00:27:05.400
<v Speaker 3>You're confusing hyposthetic properties with common powers and energies.

525
00:27:07.640 --> 00:27:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Where are you getting this notion from?

526
00:27:10.000 --> 00:27:11.839
<v Speaker 3>Have you read Basil on the Holy Spirit? Have you

527
00:27:11.839 --> 00:27:13.319
<v Speaker 3>read Basil against Unomious?

528
00:27:14.240 --> 00:27:18.640
<v Speaker 12>Oh, Basil against the Basil is what you would be.

529
00:27:18.680 --> 00:27:20.279
<v Speaker 3>I thought you knew all this stuff. You're not familiar

530
00:27:20.319 --> 00:27:20.920
<v Speaker 3>with those works?

531
00:27:22.519 --> 00:27:23.839
<v Speaker 2>Can you repeat? Can you repeat what you say?

532
00:27:23.920 --> 00:27:26.440
<v Speaker 3>Basil on the Holy Spirit and Basil against Unomious?

533
00:27:26.480 --> 00:27:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Have you read those iusunomious?

534
00:27:30.240 --> 00:27:31.079
<v Speaker 3>Don't even know the words?

535
00:27:31.279 --> 00:27:34.000
<v Speaker 2>What does.

536
00:27:35.640 --> 00:27:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Nonymious? Anonymious? So you're not even familiar with this. You're

537
00:27:39.240 --> 00:27:42.880
<v Speaker 3>not familiar with it? Is you're a clown that because

538
00:27:42.880 --> 00:27:44.799
<v Speaker 3>it shows that you're not familiar with the literature, and

539
00:27:44.799 --> 00:27:45.720
<v Speaker 3>you're trying to debate it.

540
00:27:46.000 --> 00:27:47.759
<v Speaker 2>Why that's not true?

541
00:27:48.200 --> 00:27:52.240
<v Speaker 3>True? You don't know the terms. You're demonstrating your ignorance

542
00:27:52.279 --> 00:27:53.440
<v Speaker 3>of the whole scope of this.

543
00:27:54.200 --> 00:27:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh, because I pronounce.

544
00:27:57.160 --> 00:27:58.960
<v Speaker 3>No, it means that you're not familiar with the literature.

545
00:27:59.000 --> 00:28:00.640
<v Speaker 3>You couldn't even tell me to works.

546
00:28:01.160 --> 00:28:03.440
<v Speaker 2>This is no no, have you read this?

547
00:28:03.720 --> 00:28:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Have you read this literature? Have you read this literature?

548
00:28:11.039 --> 00:28:17.119
<v Speaker 2>Uh? The literature? Ons? Why does that matter? Can you

549
00:28:17.160 --> 00:28:17.759
<v Speaker 2>show me where?

550
00:28:17.839 --> 00:28:20.240
<v Speaker 3>Because it shows that you don't. It shows that you're

551
00:28:20.279 --> 00:28:21.960
<v Speaker 3>not familiar with the topic. You don't know to pronounce

552
00:28:22.000 --> 00:28:22.680
<v Speaker 3>the basic terms.

553
00:28:22.759 --> 00:28:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Right.

554
00:28:24.839 --> 00:28:29.000
<v Speaker 3>No, No, you're about to cry, dude, like, Look, it

555
00:28:29.000 --> 00:28:31.799
<v Speaker 3>would be whove you to go and understand this stuff

556
00:28:31.839 --> 00:28:33.759
<v Speaker 3>before you try to debate it, and you did come

557
00:28:33.759 --> 00:28:34.319
<v Speaker 3>here to debate.

558
00:28:35.359 --> 00:28:37.519
<v Speaker 2>Can you please just show me where Saint Basil.

559
00:28:38.359 --> 00:28:41.519
<v Speaker 3>Argues against who's the Who's the soul cause? Who do

560
00:28:41.559 --> 00:28:42.680
<v Speaker 3>they argue is the sole cause?

561
00:28:44.519 --> 00:28:46.400
<v Speaker 2>The soul cause? What do you mean by soul calls?

562
00:28:46.480 --> 00:28:49.319
<v Speaker 3>So you're not, again, not familiar with common terminology throughout

563
00:28:49.359 --> 00:28:53.839
<v Speaker 3>all the cappadtions soul cause, soul cause, father is the

564
00:28:53.839 --> 00:28:59.000
<v Speaker 3>sole cause? The cap dictum? Shut up? Shut up? All right,

565
00:28:59.119 --> 00:29:00.160
<v Speaker 3>you're gone.

566
00:29:01.079 --> 00:29:02.240
<v Speaker 2>He's running.

567
00:29:02.359 --> 00:29:04.319
<v Speaker 3>No, you made it a fool of yourself. I'm not

568
00:29:04.400 --> 00:29:06.920
<v Speaker 3>running from you. You have no idea what you're talking about.

569
00:29:08.920 --> 00:29:11.079
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to explain it to you. You won't shut up,

570
00:29:11.119 --> 00:29:15.079
<v Speaker 3>Shut up, and I'll tell you that's fine sole cause

571
00:29:15.200 --> 00:29:18.400
<v Speaker 3>their dictum is anything that is a hypostatic property is

572
00:29:18.519 --> 00:29:23.359
<v Speaker 3>unique to the person's and non communicable or shareable. Anything

573
00:29:23.400 --> 00:29:26.359
<v Speaker 3>that is not a hypostatic property is common to all three.

574
00:29:26.440 --> 00:29:29.519
<v Speaker 3>That's a Cappadocian dictum. That's why the philioko is wrong,

575
00:29:29.559 --> 00:29:33.480
<v Speaker 3>according to the Cappadocians, because the father's principle what picks

576
00:29:33.519 --> 00:29:38.599
<v Speaker 3>him out his hypostatic property is to be sole sol

577
00:29:38.640 --> 00:29:46.039
<v Speaker 3>e cause rka fount principle. It does because it means

578
00:29:46.079 --> 00:29:49.279
<v Speaker 3>that what he has that marks him out cannot be shared.

579
00:29:49.480 --> 00:29:52.799
<v Speaker 3>That's the Cappadocian dictum.

580
00:29:52.960 --> 00:29:54.319
<v Speaker 2>Well yeah, well.

581
00:29:56.759 --> 00:30:00.960
<v Speaker 3>No, it does not relation itself is a predicate, not

582
00:30:01.079 --> 00:30:04.319
<v Speaker 3>a subject. Persons are subjects, not relations.

583
00:30:05.920 --> 00:30:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but that's the thing that so you would.

584
00:30:08.200 --> 00:30:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Know that if you've read the Cappadocian. So you have

585
00:30:10.079 --> 00:30:11.799
<v Speaker 3>no knowledge of this topic and you're trying to debate,

586
00:30:13.240 --> 00:30:15.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm asking, what does persona at rolatio mean?

587
00:30:17.559 --> 00:30:19.599
<v Speaker 2>Oh, now he wants Now he wants to speak Greek.

588
00:30:20.920 --> 00:30:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Persona at Rolatio's Latin, you idiot. Oh and I don't

589
00:30:28.519 --> 00:30:30.920
<v Speaker 3>know Latin, I don't care about Latin. But this guy

590
00:30:31.000 --> 00:30:34.799
<v Speaker 3>just showed this is the arrogance of these people no

591
00:30:34.920 --> 00:30:37.200
<v Speaker 3>knowledge of these topics. They want to debate it. Persona

592
00:30:37.240 --> 00:30:41.920
<v Speaker 3>at rolatio is Aquinas's dictum person is relation. So the

593
00:30:41.960 --> 00:30:44.400
<v Speaker 3>first person to say that is that I'm aware of

594
00:30:44.640 --> 00:30:47.400
<v Speaker 3>is perhaps Augustine, but at least for sure Aquinas.

595
00:30:48.960 --> 00:30:52.920
<v Speaker 7>I think most Orthodoxy or Catholics don't believe that salvation

596
00:30:53.119 --> 00:30:56.880
<v Speaker 7>is by grace through faith, and I make the I'm

597
00:30:56.880 --> 00:30:58.960
<v Speaker 7>gonna make the claim that it is.

598
00:31:00.079 --> 00:31:00.799
<v Speaker 2>On the scriptures.

599
00:31:01.200 --> 00:31:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, we believe that it is, but we believe that

600
00:31:03.240 --> 00:31:05.799
<v Speaker 3>those words mean different things from you. So it's not

601
00:31:05.839 --> 00:31:08.440
<v Speaker 3>that we reject the scriptures or don't believe in salvation

602
00:31:08.559 --> 00:31:11.039
<v Speaker 3>by faith or by grace, but we don't believe that

603
00:31:11.079 --> 00:31:15.200
<v Speaker 3>it's a legal standing that's imputational, which is based on

604
00:31:15.519 --> 00:31:20.960
<v Speaker 3>a heretical trinitarian theology, like.

605
00:31:20.920 --> 00:31:24.519
<v Speaker 2>A legal standing. The word justified is a legal term,

606
00:31:24.599 --> 00:31:24.880
<v Speaker 2>is it not?

607
00:31:25.160 --> 00:31:28.599
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, But it's not a purely fictional imputational legal standing.

608
00:31:28.640 --> 00:31:30.880
<v Speaker 3>That's what I'm saying is impossible because nobody in the

609
00:31:30.880 --> 00:31:34.400
<v Speaker 3>ancient medieval world were nominalists, and you need nominalism to

610
00:31:34.440 --> 00:31:35.160
<v Speaker 3>have that position.

611
00:31:38.839 --> 00:31:40.160
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean by nominalists?

612
00:31:40.319 --> 00:31:40.720
<v Speaker 13>Sorry?

613
00:31:41.400 --> 00:31:45.519
<v Speaker 3>Right, So the reformers like Luther relied on medieval nominalists

614
00:31:45.559 --> 00:31:47.839
<v Speaker 3>like Akham and Bile to figure out how it was

615
00:31:47.920 --> 00:31:50.160
<v Speaker 3>possible for God to declare people to be a legal

616
00:31:50.200 --> 00:31:54.079
<v Speaker 3>state that they weren't ontologically that thing. So that's nominalism,

617
00:31:54.160 --> 00:31:57.440
<v Speaker 3>that it's a name only position, a legal standing position

618
00:31:57.519 --> 00:32:01.119
<v Speaker 3>that doesn't reflect an actual ontological change in being. And

619
00:32:01.200 --> 00:32:04.000
<v Speaker 3>since nobody in the ancient Imita the world were nominalists

620
00:32:04.079 --> 00:32:06.880
<v Speaker 3>until Aukham, that means Paul didn't teach your.

621
00:32:06.880 --> 00:32:14.440
<v Speaker 2>View, doesn't it say everyone's four to five? That's let's see,

622
00:32:14.519 --> 00:32:15.279
<v Speaker 2>let me pull it up here.

623
00:32:16.039 --> 00:32:18.119
<v Speaker 3>So you're not gonna address what I said. You're gonna blow.

624
00:32:18.000 --> 00:32:18.440
<v Speaker 14>Past you know.

625
00:32:18.759 --> 00:32:21.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to understand what you're saying. I'm not trying

626
00:32:21.200 --> 00:32:21.799
<v Speaker 2>to ignore it.

627
00:32:24.200 --> 00:32:28.720
<v Speaker 3>Have you read Alistair McGrath? No, what is that funny?

628
00:32:28.759 --> 00:32:29.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't understand.

629
00:32:30.000 --> 00:32:31.680
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm just I'm not laughing at you.

630
00:32:31.720 --> 00:32:34.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm just saying, no, I haven't well, but you laughed,

631
00:32:34.519 --> 00:32:36.160
<v Speaker 3>so I don't understand why it's funny.

632
00:32:37.279 --> 00:32:37.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't.

633
00:32:38.119 --> 00:32:38.480
<v Speaker 9>I don't know.

634
00:32:38.480 --> 00:32:41.279
<v Speaker 7>It's just chuckle, dude. Okay, I'm a little I've never

635
00:32:41.279 --> 00:32:43.519
<v Speaker 7>done one of these before, so it's a bit new

636
00:32:43.559 --> 00:32:44.920
<v Speaker 7>to me. Maybe more of a nervous laughter.

637
00:32:45.079 --> 00:32:48.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay. Well, McGrath is one of the most famous modern

638
00:32:48.200 --> 00:32:51.359
<v Speaker 3>Oxford Protestant scholars. He wrote a book called Eustacia Day

639
00:32:51.400 --> 00:32:53.759
<v Speaker 3>and in that book he admits that nobody in the

640
00:32:53.759 --> 00:32:56.839
<v Speaker 3>ancient a medieval world until about fifteen hundreds had the

641
00:32:56.880 --> 00:32:59.240
<v Speaker 3>idea of justification by faith alone.

642
00:33:00.559 --> 00:33:02.720
<v Speaker 7>Okay, here, let me pull up some quotes here then,

643
00:33:03.799 --> 00:33:06.400
<v Speaker 7>didn't uh, let me fall some quotes with some church fathers.

644
00:33:06.400 --> 00:33:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, church fathers who believed in apisodic succession and the

645
00:33:10.200 --> 00:33:12.000
<v Speaker 3>real presence you think they taught justification.

646
00:33:13.440 --> 00:33:14.359
<v Speaker 2>Let me pull on.

647
00:33:15.680 --> 00:33:17.799
<v Speaker 3>You're going to pull up a bunch of quote minds

648
00:33:17.880 --> 00:33:21.079
<v Speaker 3>that don't say what I'm saying. They say what you

649
00:33:21.119 --> 00:33:23.160
<v Speaker 3>think they're saying. So you're going to read into these

650
00:33:23.319 --> 00:33:25.759
<v Speaker 3>church fathers who also teach the necessity of works and

651
00:33:25.799 --> 00:33:27.920
<v Speaker 3>then use the real presence. You're going to try to

652
00:33:28.000 --> 00:33:34.759
<v Speaker 3>quote mind then to prove the Protestant doctrines. Okay, I

653
00:33:34.839 --> 00:33:36.279
<v Speaker 3>used to be a Protestant, Dude, I did all this.

654
00:33:36.359 --> 00:33:38.759
<v Speaker 3>Don't you think I know what you're gonna do?

655
00:33:39.400 --> 00:33:40.319
<v Speaker 2>What do you put you mean?

656
00:33:40.680 --> 00:33:43.160
<v Speaker 7>I'm just trying to put out a position here and

657
00:33:44.240 --> 00:33:44.799
<v Speaker 7>I don't.

658
00:33:45.160 --> 00:33:46.839
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, like I'm not particularly the.

659
00:33:46.920 --> 00:33:49.680
<v Speaker 3>Romans for let's go to Romans for when Paul, who

660
00:33:49.720 --> 00:33:53.039
<v Speaker 3>does Paul? Where does Paul cite? In Genesis and Romans for.

661
00:33:54.599 --> 00:33:58.519
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's just read it here Romans for three four.

662
00:33:59.200 --> 00:34:01.680
<v Speaker 7>What's say at the scripture Abraham believed God and it

663
00:34:01.720 --> 00:34:02.160
<v Speaker 7>was kind.

664
00:34:02.000 --> 00:34:03.279
<v Speaker 2>Of him for righteous? Yes?

665
00:34:03.440 --> 00:34:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Where is he citing a.

666
00:34:05.319 --> 00:34:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Roman's death Genesis chapter fifteen, verses three six?

667
00:34:09.480 --> 00:34:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Right? Now, tell me this in the Protestant view in

668
00:34:12.840 --> 00:34:15.519
<v Speaker 3>terms of the transition from rath to grace, as the

669
00:34:15.559 --> 00:34:18.960
<v Speaker 3>reformer spoke of, when was that in Abraham's.

670
00:34:18.400 --> 00:34:22.760
<v Speaker 7>Life Genesis chapter fifteen when it says he believed God?

671
00:34:23.719 --> 00:34:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for refuting? Yes, thank you for reputing. Thank

672
00:34:26.519 --> 00:34:31.039
<v Speaker 3>you for refuting Protestantism, because it's just it's Genesis twelve

673
00:34:31.480 --> 00:34:34.920
<v Speaker 3>where Abraham first believes and does several chapters of good

674
00:34:34.960 --> 00:34:38.320
<v Speaker 3>works before Genesis fifteen. So you just refuted Protestantism in

675
00:34:38.400 --> 00:34:38.880
<v Speaker 3>Romans four.

676
00:34:40.000 --> 00:34:43.880
<v Speaker 7>No, because you read, you read the rest of the chapter.

677
00:34:43.960 --> 00:34:47.559
<v Speaker 7>It's talking about Genesis chapter fifteen or so.

678
00:34:47.599 --> 00:34:50.639
<v Speaker 3>You literally heard nothing I said, and you're not addressing area.

679
00:34:50.719 --> 00:34:54.079
<v Speaker 3>You don't even understand the argument. You're you're blowing past

680
00:34:54.199 --> 00:34:54.800
<v Speaker 3>the argument.

681
00:34:56.079 --> 00:34:58.159
<v Speaker 2>Maybe maybe I'm just not quite getting with you.

682
00:34:58.239 --> 00:35:00.599
<v Speaker 3>Right, You're not correct. Do you want me to state

683
00:35:00.639 --> 00:35:06.159
<v Speaker 3>it again? Sure, the transition from wrath to grace should

684
00:35:06.159 --> 00:35:11.760
<v Speaker 3>be Genesis twelve, not fifteen. So by Paul citing Genesis fifteen,

685
00:35:12.199 --> 00:35:14.920
<v Speaker 3>you refute the Protestant position.

686
00:35:18.320 --> 00:35:21.760
<v Speaker 7>I'm sorry, I don't follow that because, oh my god,

687
00:35:21.840 --> 00:35:24.719
<v Speaker 7>hold on, hold on, dude, hold on, because in Genesis twelve,

688
00:35:24.800 --> 00:35:27.079
<v Speaker 7>the command was just get out of your country. It

689
00:35:27.119 --> 00:35:29.039
<v Speaker 7>wasn't that he'd be a father of many nations or

690
00:35:29.320 --> 00:35:32.199
<v Speaker 7>if it was, like he didn't completely comprehend that, and

691
00:35:32.239 --> 00:35:33.800
<v Speaker 7>it records.

692
00:35:33.119 --> 00:35:35.400
<v Speaker 3>Did he believe in faith and general So this is

693
00:35:35.719 --> 00:35:38.800
<v Speaker 3>this is let me present my position. You're you're you're

694
00:35:38.840 --> 00:35:40.079
<v Speaker 3>ignoring the argument.

695
00:35:40.199 --> 00:35:41.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm not trying. I'm not trying to.

696
00:35:41.480 --> 00:35:43.519
<v Speaker 3>Yes, you are. You're inventing a bunch of bull crap

697
00:35:43.599 --> 00:35:48.679
<v Speaker 3>about No, he wasn't so he wasn't justified in no,

698
00:35:48.719 --> 00:35:50.760
<v Speaker 3>you're not. You don't even know what the word of

699
00:35:50.760 --> 00:35:53.639
<v Speaker 3>God is. You don't even know what. So he does

700
00:35:53.679 --> 00:35:56.199
<v Speaker 3>three chapters of good works, but he's not justified yet.

701
00:35:56.239 --> 00:35:57.559
<v Speaker 3>This is how silly your position is.

702
00:35:59.000 --> 00:36:01.039
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, yeah, so.

703
00:36:01.079 --> 00:36:03.440
<v Speaker 3>God didn't make a covenant with him.

704
00:36:03.480 --> 00:36:05.679
<v Speaker 2>Now to him, that worketh is the reward not right.

705
00:36:05.800 --> 00:36:07.400
<v Speaker 3>So you're not going to listen to the argument. You're

706
00:36:07.400 --> 00:36:08.199
<v Speaker 3>just gonna starting.

707
00:36:09.400 --> 00:36:12.159
<v Speaker 2>You're not listening to me. You're not letting me get.

708
00:36:11.519 --> 00:36:13.519
<v Speaker 3>Did Abraham believe God in Genesis twelve?

709
00:36:14.119 --> 00:36:17.320
<v Speaker 2>He believed? Okay, let's just let's just quote that. Let's

710
00:36:17.320 --> 00:36:18.079
<v Speaker 2>go to Genesis twelve.

711
00:36:18.159 --> 00:36:22.360
<v Speaker 7>Let's just go there, yess twelve, that's in Genesis twelve.

712
00:36:22.440 --> 00:36:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Three.

713
00:36:23.039 --> 00:36:25.360
<v Speaker 3>Does he build an altar in verse eight and call

714
00:36:25.440 --> 00:36:26.840
<v Speaker 3>upon the name of the Lord and worship him?

715
00:36:26.960 --> 00:36:33.400
<v Speaker 7>Oh, all right, Genesis twelve, Get the out.

716
00:36:33.280 --> 00:36:35.039
<v Speaker 2>Of that country, and from my kindred and from my

717
00:36:35.159 --> 00:36:37.480
<v Speaker 2>father's house onto a land that I will kill thee.

718
00:36:37.679 --> 00:36:39.360
<v Speaker 7>I will make of the a great nation that will

719
00:36:39.360 --> 00:36:42.199
<v Speaker 7>bless thee, and make thy name great, that thou and

720
00:36:43.159 --> 00:36:44.239
<v Speaker 7>thou shalt be a blessing.

721
00:36:45.039 --> 00:36:46.719
<v Speaker 2>And I will bless them the blessed being curse and

722
00:36:46.800 --> 00:36:53.159
<v Speaker 2>the curse of thee. Oh, sorry about that? That will

723
00:36:53.199 --> 00:36:55.719
<v Speaker 2>bless them, the blessed being curse and the kirsty. And

724
00:36:55.719 --> 00:36:57.639
<v Speaker 2>then these shall all families with the earth to bless.

725
00:36:57.880 --> 00:37:00.280
<v Speaker 2>So Abraham departed, as the Lord had spoken about him.

726
00:37:00.400 --> 00:37:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Does he build an altar in versus seven eight nine,

727
00:37:02.920 --> 00:37:03.679
<v Speaker 3>worship God.

728
00:37:03.960 --> 00:37:08.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm getting there. I'm getting there, all right, all right,

729
00:37:08.199 --> 00:37:08.960
<v Speaker 2>I'll just go to verse eight.

730
00:37:09.320 --> 00:37:11.639
<v Speaker 7>And he removed from thence onto a mountain on the

731
00:37:11.679 --> 00:37:14.840
<v Speaker 7>east of Bethel, and pitched his tent, having Bethel on

732
00:37:14.880 --> 00:37:15.719
<v Speaker 7>the west verse.

733
00:37:15.599 --> 00:37:17.239
<v Speaker 3>Seven, eight and nine. Seven.

734
00:37:19.440 --> 00:37:21.119
<v Speaker 2>Excuse me, I didn't I didn't hear, so.

735
00:37:21.400 --> 00:37:23.639
<v Speaker 3>I said, seven eight nine, he builds an altar.

736
00:37:24.239 --> 00:37:28.119
<v Speaker 7>Dude, I didn't hear you, so my mistake. And the

737
00:37:28.159 --> 00:37:30.519
<v Speaker 7>Lord appeared onto Abraham and said, unto the sea, but

738
00:37:30.639 --> 00:37:33.400
<v Speaker 7>I give this land. And there he built an altar,

739
00:37:33.480 --> 00:37:34.920
<v Speaker 7>unto the Lord who appeared unto him.

740
00:37:35.239 --> 00:37:39.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay, yeah, oh, but he's not saved yet.

741
00:37:40.000 --> 00:37:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Well listen, well, when was he declared righteous? My God?

742
00:37:46.000 --> 00:37:47.559
<v Speaker 2>You tell me when? When does the.

743
00:37:47.480 --> 00:37:50.400
<v Speaker 7>Bible say that he was declared righteous by God? When

744
00:37:50.400 --> 00:37:51.000
<v Speaker 7>did it count for it?

745
00:37:51.119 --> 00:37:53.519
<v Speaker 3>For right now, I'm showing the stupidity of your interpretation

746
00:37:53.559 --> 00:37:54.239
<v Speaker 3>of Roman school.

747
00:37:54.440 --> 00:37:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's an assertion. That's an assertion that you're making.

748
00:37:57.400 --> 00:38:00.000
<v Speaker 2>You're not really backing it up, though, So I'm.

749
00:38:00.360 --> 00:38:03.079
<v Speaker 3>It up by the fact that shut up, shut up,

750
00:38:03.400 --> 00:38:08.000
<v Speaker 3>shut up, or you're gone. In verse in verse in

751
00:38:08.119 --> 00:38:11.639
<v Speaker 3>verses seven and eight, he worships the Lord God. Obviously

752
00:38:11.679 --> 00:38:16.559
<v Speaker 3>accepts this worship. He acts in faith for the next

753
00:38:16.599 --> 00:38:22.440
<v Speaker 3>several chapters until Genesis fifteen. So this refutes your stupid

754
00:38:22.559 --> 00:38:27.119
<v Speaker 3>argument that he was saved in fifteen. So Romans four

755
00:38:27.280 --> 00:38:30.239
<v Speaker 3>doesn't teach the Protestant view. It's just your assumption that

756
00:38:30.280 --> 00:38:31.480
<v Speaker 3>it taught the Protestant view.

757
00:38:31.760 --> 00:38:33.559
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let me ask you this Roman.

758
00:38:34.039 --> 00:38:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Now you're going to change the subject.

759
00:38:35.639 --> 00:38:37.840
<v Speaker 2>I am not. I am not going to change the subject.

760
00:38:38.280 --> 00:38:41.039
<v Speaker 3>So was he not saved for three chapters of good works?

761
00:38:41.440 --> 00:38:42.639
<v Speaker 2>And I asked a question.

762
00:38:42.679 --> 00:38:45.000
<v Speaker 3>You're not No, was he not saved?

763
00:38:45.840 --> 00:38:47.239
<v Speaker 2>No? Because it doesn't say he was declared.

764
00:38:47.440 --> 00:38:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so yeah, you're an idiot, so so so God.

765
00:38:50.440 --> 00:38:52.360
<v Speaker 3>So he does all these good works and he's not

766
00:38:52.400 --> 00:38:56.320
<v Speaker 3>saved until to just save your stupid position it is.

767
00:38:56.360 --> 00:39:01.079
<v Speaker 3>It's nonsense, you're so he's not He's not lauded for

768
00:39:01.119 --> 00:39:03.280
<v Speaker 3>his faith when he goes into Egypt in fourteen.

769
00:39:06.199 --> 00:39:07.920
<v Speaker 2>W are you talking about specific thirteen?

770
00:39:08.000 --> 00:39:10.440
<v Speaker 3>So when he fourteen, when he when he after the

771
00:39:10.480 --> 00:39:13.599
<v Speaker 3>Battle of the Kings, when he tithes to Malkisa deck,

772
00:39:13.840 --> 00:39:17.519
<v Speaker 3>he's not even saved yet for his he's lauded as

773
00:39:17.559 --> 00:39:22.360
<v Speaker 3>a faith champion in Hebrews eleven when he's not even saved.

774
00:39:22.360 --> 00:39:23.920
<v Speaker 3>This is how stupid your position is.

775
00:39:25.239 --> 00:39:27.519
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so that's that's what you're just gonna do, just

776
00:39:27.559 --> 00:39:31.320
<v Speaker 2>like I just dunk on somebody who's never done this before.

777
00:39:31.400 --> 00:39:34.000
<v Speaker 3>So now you're playing victim when you're ad a bunch

778
00:39:34.000 --> 00:39:35.920
<v Speaker 3>of bad arguments. Well, you're dead about me. I've never

779
00:39:35.920 --> 00:39:40.400
<v Speaker 3>done this before. No you're not. No, you're not. No,

780
00:39:40.440 --> 00:39:43.519
<v Speaker 3>you're not. It is retarded because so and so you're

781
00:39:43.559 --> 00:39:47.159
<v Speaker 3>saying that he's an enemy of God when he's lauded

782
00:39:47.159 --> 00:39:49.000
<v Speaker 3>for tithing to makiz dec in fourteen.

783
00:39:49.599 --> 00:39:51.480
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, okay, yes you are saying that.

784
00:39:51.480 --> 00:39:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Why are you lying if he's if it's not, if

785
00:39:54.880 --> 00:39:57.679
<v Speaker 3>he's not saved, you are because if he's not saved

786
00:39:57.760 --> 00:40:00.639
<v Speaker 3>until Genesis fifteen, then he's still undergo wrath and an

787
00:40:00.719 --> 00:40:02.639
<v Speaker 3>enemy of God in the protest position. What are you saying?

788
00:40:02.679 --> 00:40:03.920
<v Speaker 3>On my goodness, that's your position?

789
00:40:05.119 --> 00:40:08.119
<v Speaker 7>Can I at least state what I was going to say?

790
00:40:08.480 --> 00:40:11.440
<v Speaker 3>Or you said that he's not saved until fifteen? That

791
00:40:11.519 --> 00:40:15.880
<v Speaker 3>means in this story? That is that not what it

792
00:40:15.960 --> 00:40:19.159
<v Speaker 3>means to be saved in the Protestant view? Okay, all right,

793
00:40:19.199 --> 00:40:22.719
<v Speaker 3>you're e're a liar You're so dishonest, man, You are

794
00:40:22.800 --> 00:40:26.679
<v Speaker 3>being dishonest. Why are you even here doing this? It's

795
00:40:26.679 --> 00:40:31.320
<v Speaker 3>just ridiculous, dude. So there you go. So Abraham is

796
00:40:31.360 --> 00:40:35.960
<v Speaker 3>over here tithing. He's lauded in Genesis in Hebrews eleven

797
00:40:36.039 --> 00:40:41.000
<v Speaker 3>as a model of faith. After he goes to battle

798
00:40:41.039 --> 00:40:44.760
<v Speaker 3>to save Lot in Genesis thirteen and he's lost in

799
00:40:44.800 --> 00:40:47.480
<v Speaker 3>all of this. How stupid the Protestant position is. And

800
00:40:47.480 --> 00:40:52.679
<v Speaker 3>then he plays victim. I've never done this. So he's

801
00:40:52.760 --> 00:40:55.239
<v Speaker 3>lauded as a model of faith in Hebrews eleven for

802
00:40:55.320 --> 00:40:58.159
<v Speaker 3>what he does in Genesis fourteen, but according to this

803
00:40:58.199 --> 00:41:03.320
<v Speaker 3>guy's idiot Protestant argument, he's still not saved until Genesis fifteen.

804
00:41:05.159 --> 00:41:10.960
<v Speaker 15>Okay, I'm trying to understand some of the issues that

805
00:41:11.199 --> 00:41:13.800
<v Speaker 15>you have with the.

806
00:41:14.159 --> 00:41:16.239
<v Speaker 2>Reformed or the Protestant world.

807
00:41:17.199 --> 00:41:22.239
<v Speaker 15>And am I right in understanding that your view is

808
00:41:22.360 --> 00:41:31.639
<v Speaker 15>specifically a rooted in epistemology, that the Church has determined

809
00:41:32.480 --> 00:41:37.679
<v Speaker 15>the canon or I guess I'm trying to figure out

810
00:41:37.719 --> 00:41:41.519
<v Speaker 15>how the ontological aspect.

811
00:41:42.599 --> 00:41:46.559
<v Speaker 2>Relates to that. If there's a.

812
00:41:48.559 --> 00:41:54.320
<v Speaker 15>If the Church determined scripture via the Holy Spirit, or

813
00:41:54.719 --> 00:41:59.119
<v Speaker 15>if the church is recognizing the canon in a passive sense,

814
00:42:00.480 --> 00:42:04.039
<v Speaker 15>and it so much seems to hinge on that, and

815
00:42:04.079 --> 00:42:07.119
<v Speaker 15>I'm just looking for some clarify.

816
00:42:06.840 --> 00:42:08.639
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it sounds like a lot of speculation, Like

817
00:42:08.679 --> 00:42:10.440
<v Speaker 3>you don't think we can go and read the people

818
00:42:10.440 --> 00:42:13.599
<v Speaker 3>who determine the canon. So you're talking about active and passive,

819
00:42:13.719 --> 00:42:17.679
<v Speaker 3>and like, so what the six Ecumentical Council, the people

820
00:42:17.679 --> 00:42:20.000
<v Speaker 3>that wrote the Abstaltic Canons were passive? I mean that

821
00:42:20.039 --> 00:42:21.719
<v Speaker 3>doesn't make any sense. What are you talking about?

822
00:42:23.559 --> 00:42:24.679
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so.

823
00:42:26.840 --> 00:42:30.360
<v Speaker 15>If you would recognize me as such, I was a

824
00:42:30.400 --> 00:42:36.320
<v Speaker 15>convert out of atheism. However, I wouldn't be recognized as Orthodox,

825
00:42:36.360 --> 00:42:39.920
<v Speaker 15>so you might dispute that. So when I come into it,

826
00:42:39.960 --> 00:42:42.599
<v Speaker 15>I've already come into a place where people are saying

827
00:42:42.639 --> 00:42:46.719
<v Speaker 15>here's the canon, and then later I discovered the Orthodox

828
00:42:46.719 --> 00:42:49.960
<v Speaker 15>are saying, well, actually it's this. There's a few other

829
00:42:50.000 --> 00:42:54.119
<v Speaker 15>books involved, And so would I kind of come into it.

830
00:42:54.159 --> 00:42:57.360
<v Speaker 15>I'm looking, Okay, why do the Protestants say this is

831
00:42:57.400 --> 00:42:57.960
<v Speaker 15>their canon?

832
00:42:58.519 --> 00:43:01.079
<v Speaker 2>Why do the Catholics say X this?

833
00:43:01.239 --> 00:43:03.840
<v Speaker 3>In likewise, what are you talking about active and passive?

834
00:43:04.119 --> 00:43:05.559
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm not trying to be mean, but like

835
00:43:05.599 --> 00:43:08.360
<v Speaker 3>this whole history go.

836
00:43:08.360 --> 00:43:15.440
<v Speaker 15>Ahead, yes, because I what I was hearing from the

837
00:43:15.519 --> 00:43:20.000
<v Speaker 15>reform position. That is, it sounds like they assert the

838
00:43:20.079 --> 00:43:24.760
<v Speaker 15>ontological distinction first, that God determines scripture.

839
00:43:26.039 --> 00:43:29.400
<v Speaker 3>How do they know that these are assertions? I mean,

840
00:43:29.519 --> 00:43:32.599
<v Speaker 3>I can cite you in church history specifically when and

841
00:43:32.639 --> 00:43:37.199
<v Speaker 3>where the canon was discussed, debated, and determined. For example,

842
00:43:37.320 --> 00:43:39.679
<v Speaker 3>the Apostolic Canons, which most Protests don't even know what

843
00:43:39.719 --> 00:43:42.760
<v Speaker 3>that is. The eighty fifth Apostolic Canon, for example, mentions

844
00:43:42.800 --> 00:43:46.679
<v Speaker 3>Maccabees and sirrric And when the QUINTESESX Council of six

845
00:43:46.880 --> 00:43:49.840
<v Speaker 3>ninety two, which is affirmed at the Seventh Medical Council

846
00:43:49.840 --> 00:43:54.320
<v Speaker 3>in seven eighty seven, mentions the canonical scriptures, It mentions

847
00:43:55.039 --> 00:43:58.960
<v Speaker 3>the Apostholic Canons. Protestants don't know anything about that, and

848
00:43:59.000 --> 00:44:03.599
<v Speaker 3>they never talk about that, almost never. So all of

849
00:44:03.599 --> 00:44:08.079
<v Speaker 3>this assertion of active passive determined, I mean, this is

850
00:44:08.079 --> 00:44:11.119
<v Speaker 3>all Protestant gibberish. I can tell you the exact places

851
00:44:11.400 --> 00:44:13.920
<v Speaker 3>where in the history of the Church these decisions were made.

852
00:44:16.400 --> 00:44:20.320
<v Speaker 15>Right right, and I wouldn't dispute that. But what seems

853
00:44:20.360 --> 00:44:27.440
<v Speaker 15>to be have taken place is that heterodox pressures seem

854
00:44:27.519 --> 00:44:32.519
<v Speaker 15>to back the historical Church into a position of saying

855
00:44:32.920 --> 00:44:35.800
<v Speaker 15>we must formally make this declaration.

856
00:44:36.440 --> 00:44:38.559
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, which means that they weren't operating on solar

857
00:44:38.559 --> 00:44:42.559
<v Speaker 3>scripture prior to that, right, right.

858
00:44:43.440 --> 00:44:47.199
<v Speaker 15>From what I understand is that Protestants are arguing that

859
00:44:47.360 --> 00:44:55.119
<v Speaker 15>solar scripture is the recognized is the primary documents on

860
00:44:55.440 --> 00:45:00.760
<v Speaker 15>apostolic authority, and so it almost sounds like it's just

861
00:45:00.800 --> 00:45:04.119
<v Speaker 15>a matter of method that these are the primary documents

862
00:45:05.000 --> 00:45:10.280
<v Speaker 15>by which we judge all subsequent tradition and dogma or

863
00:45:10.320 --> 00:45:11.639
<v Speaker 15>anything based off of it.

864
00:45:12.599 --> 00:45:15.280
<v Speaker 2>And so they're always referring to.

865
00:45:15.199 --> 00:45:20.239
<v Speaker 15>This specific canon as the means by which we judge

866
00:45:20.239 --> 00:45:23.320
<v Speaker 15>all this. And so what I've come to learn is

867
00:45:23.360 --> 00:45:26.519
<v Speaker 15>that a lot of books that other traditions are saying

868
00:45:27.119 --> 00:45:28.559
<v Speaker 15>should be included in the canon.

869
00:45:30.119 --> 00:45:30.800
<v Speaker 2>I've come to.

870
00:45:30.719 --> 00:45:35.400
<v Speaker 15>It later as an understanding through Protestants that these are

871
00:45:35.440 --> 00:45:42.480
<v Speaker 15>important documents, but that the canon is basically man's recognition

872
00:45:43.480 --> 00:45:48.800
<v Speaker 15>of something that's already onto logically prior so that the

873
00:45:48.840 --> 00:45:50.159
<v Speaker 15>authority of God.

874
00:45:50.480 --> 00:45:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Point, So nobody is denying that the texts were

875
00:45:55.880 --> 00:45:59.239
<v Speaker 3>inspired and they have authority from God. The point is

876
00:45:59.280 --> 00:46:03.719
<v Speaker 3>that it's a post apostolic decision that's very late, that

877
00:46:03.920 --> 00:46:07.719
<v Speaker 3>involves human beings that Protestants think were fallen, fallible and

878
00:46:07.760 --> 00:46:10.400
<v Speaker 3>didn't have the Gospel that made the decision of what

879
00:46:10.519 --> 00:46:12.880
<v Speaker 3>makes up that canon. And it's not just that, it's

880
00:46:12.920 --> 00:46:15.280
<v Speaker 3>also you don't have a time machine to go back

881
00:46:15.360 --> 00:46:19.559
<v Speaker 3>and get Paul's AUTOGRAPHA. You're trusting that those Apostolic sees

882
00:46:19.639 --> 00:46:25.079
<v Speaker 3>and churches with absolute succession, those bishoprics preserved those Pauline

883
00:46:25.360 --> 00:46:29.320
<v Speaker 3>or gospel texts, which sometimes don't have their author listed,

884
00:46:29.360 --> 00:46:31.679
<v Speaker 3>like Matthew doesn't tell you who that is. How do

885
00:46:31.719 --> 00:46:34.159
<v Speaker 3>you know this is Matthew the Apostle. So you're relying

886
00:46:34.199 --> 00:46:37.199
<v Speaker 3>on the tradition of those churches to preserve and hand

887
00:46:37.239 --> 00:46:40.920
<v Speaker 3>them down as part of canonicity, as well as things

888
00:46:41.079 --> 00:46:46.639
<v Speaker 3>like liturgical inclusion. So it's missing the point to say that, well,

889
00:46:46.679 --> 00:46:50.800
<v Speaker 3>the church is just recognizing what God inspired. Yeah, was

890
00:46:50.840 --> 00:46:54.679
<v Speaker 3>that recognition decision inspired or not? And this is why

891
00:46:54.920 --> 00:46:58.400
<v Speaker 3>Arci spol for example, says, oh, well, the Bible is

892
00:46:58.719 --> 00:47:01.840
<v Speaker 3>a fallible collection of infallible documents. And when we had

893
00:47:01.840 --> 00:47:03.800
<v Speaker 3>a Protestant here the other day when we were demanding this,

894
00:47:03.840 --> 00:47:05.559
<v Speaker 3>he says, oh, yeah, it could be changed, it could

895
00:47:05.599 --> 00:47:08.119
<v Speaker 3>be wrong. Oh, so the Word of God is subject

896
00:47:08.159 --> 00:47:11.679
<v Speaker 3>to new discoveries as to what can be taken out

897
00:47:11.760 --> 00:47:14.119
<v Speaker 3>or perhaps added to, which means that the whole position

898
00:47:14.159 --> 00:47:14.800
<v Speaker 3>is nonsense.

899
00:47:17.760 --> 00:47:22.119
<v Speaker 15>Yes, And I think what you're saying is I largely

900
00:47:22.159 --> 00:47:26.639
<v Speaker 15>agree with everything that you're saying. I guess I'm trying

901
00:47:26.679 --> 00:47:30.960
<v Speaker 15>to just narrow the scope of the disagreement and I'm

902
00:47:30.960 --> 00:47:35.199
<v Speaker 15>trying to figure it out because when I hear you

903
00:47:35.239 --> 00:47:38.800
<v Speaker 15>discuss it, it sounds good. It sounds like, yes, there's

904
00:47:38.840 --> 00:47:44.880
<v Speaker 15>this epistemological concern that that takes precedent, and I don't

905
00:47:44.920 --> 00:47:50.039
<v Speaker 15>know if that provides a certain psychological.

906
00:47:49.280 --> 00:47:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Security well okay, or or if if.

907
00:47:54.360 --> 00:47:58.840
<v Speaker 15>There's a an ontological priority and we're just not sure,

908
00:47:58.920 --> 00:48:01.199
<v Speaker 15>but we know that they're has to be this higher

909
00:48:02.480 --> 00:48:07.320
<v Speaker 15>divine recognition or is it impossible that we would have

910
00:48:07.360 --> 00:48:09.519
<v Speaker 15>failed to grasp the canon?

911
00:48:10.280 --> 00:48:13.199
<v Speaker 3>I mean all of this, I mean the whole point

912
00:48:13.239 --> 00:48:15.599
<v Speaker 3>has just become orthodox, Like what's all of this yappin

913
00:48:15.679 --> 00:48:17.960
<v Speaker 3>and speculation about all this and that? Like what are

914
00:48:17.960 --> 00:48:21.800
<v Speaker 3>you talking about? Like it's the church historically determined the canon,

915
00:48:21.880 --> 00:48:23.840
<v Speaker 3>and it is the Orthodox Church, and you can go

916
00:48:23.880 --> 00:48:24.880
<v Speaker 3>read those people.

917
00:48:26.599 --> 00:48:29.360
<v Speaker 2>And so you would equate all of the.

918
00:48:31.000 --> 00:48:33.599
<v Speaker 15>All of the church history because when I when I

919
00:48:33.639 --> 00:48:37.760
<v Speaker 15>read church history, I hate to say this, but it

920
00:48:37.800 --> 00:48:39.119
<v Speaker 15>almost seems a bit messy.

921
00:48:39.440 --> 00:48:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

922
00:48:40.039 --> 00:48:42.480
<v Speaker 15>There's guys that are saying this guy was a heretic

923
00:48:42.559 --> 00:48:46.199
<v Speaker 15>on that position. And and so it seems to be

924
00:48:46.280 --> 00:48:49.719
<v Speaker 15>that the community is pretty broad. But the one thing

925
00:48:49.760 --> 00:48:52.840
<v Speaker 15>that seems to be central is they all have a

926
00:48:53.480 --> 00:49:02.039
<v Speaker 15>deep reverence for scripture, even prior to a a complete

927
00:49:02.079 --> 00:49:03.760
<v Speaker 15>it can and a formal recognize.

928
00:49:03.800 --> 00:49:05.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but that has nothing to doe in no way

929
00:49:05.800 --> 00:49:08.159
<v Speaker 3>does that prove the Protestant doctrine of sa scripture.

930
00:49:11.519 --> 00:49:17.239
<v Speaker 15>So maybe I'm misunderstanding the Protestant doctrine because it seemed.

931
00:49:16.960 --> 00:49:19.119
<v Speaker 3>To be do you believe that it's a fallible collection

932
00:49:19.199 --> 00:49:20.119
<v Speaker 3>of infallible books?

933
00:49:23.119 --> 00:49:24.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? You know.

934
00:49:24.320 --> 00:49:28.360
<v Speaker 15>To be honest, I'm not sure if it's a fallible collection.

935
00:49:28.639 --> 00:49:31.039
<v Speaker 15>I seem to agree with the way it developed in

936
00:49:31.119 --> 00:49:31.800
<v Speaker 15>church history.

937
00:49:32.119 --> 00:49:35.480
<v Speaker 3>So it's an infallible collection. So you would assign infallibility

938
00:49:35.480 --> 00:49:38.920
<v Speaker 3>to a decision of the church post apostles. That's not Protestant.

939
00:49:41.239 --> 00:49:44.000
<v Speaker 15>Well, I'm not a I don't know how to make

940
00:49:44.039 --> 00:49:48.199
<v Speaker 15>that declaration of that firm commitment as to whether I

941
00:49:48.199 --> 00:49:50.679
<v Speaker 15>think it was fallible or infallible collect.

942
00:49:50.400 --> 00:49:53.679
<v Speaker 3>Well, if it's not fallible, it must be infallible. There's

943
00:49:53.719 --> 00:49:55.920
<v Speaker 3>not a whole lot of options there is there between

944
00:49:55.960 --> 00:49:56.360
<v Speaker 3>those two.

945
00:49:57.440 --> 00:50:00.960
<v Speaker 15>They're mutually exclu I'm just not yeah, and I just

946
00:50:01.000 --> 00:50:04.280
<v Speaker 15>don't feel comfortable saying one way or the other.

947
00:50:04.519 --> 00:50:05.440
<v Speaker 2>It seems like.

948
00:50:07.519 --> 00:50:11.079
<v Speaker 15>I don't see any reason how how are I don't

949
00:50:11.119 --> 00:50:11.800
<v Speaker 15>have any.

950
00:50:12.440 --> 00:50:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so uh to how it forms. If you don't

951
00:50:16.280 --> 00:50:18.119
<v Speaker 3>have an objection, then you don't have a problem with

952
00:50:18.199 --> 00:50:19.800
<v Speaker 3>the Apostolic canons.

953
00:50:22.639 --> 00:50:23.280
<v Speaker 2>They are are.

954
00:50:25.440 --> 00:50:29.400
<v Speaker 15>I'm sorry, I would have to familiarize myself specifically with

955
00:50:29.519 --> 00:50:30.599
<v Speaker 15>Apostolic canons.

956
00:50:31.719 --> 00:50:32.719
<v Speaker 3>So you're not familiar with that.

957
00:50:35.280 --> 00:50:41.599
<v Speaker 15>Are you talking about a specific recognition like uh, a

958
00:50:41.639 --> 00:50:49.480
<v Speaker 15>collection of documents? Yes, okay, unless maybe I'm misunderstanding the

959
00:50:49.599 --> 00:50:50.519
<v Speaker 15>name or something.

960
00:50:54.280 --> 00:50:57.559
<v Speaker 3>Cannons are some of the earliest forms the collections of

961
00:50:57.800 --> 00:51:02.079
<v Speaker 3>church law. Canon law. Are not arguing that they're infallible

962
00:51:02.119 --> 00:51:05.079
<v Speaker 3>because they're called Apostolic canons. I'm just pointing out that

963
00:51:05.159 --> 00:51:09.320
<v Speaker 3>Canon eighty five is a list of the canonical texts

964
00:51:09.400 --> 00:51:13.800
<v Speaker 3>that the ancient Church in the fourth century considered canonical.

965
00:51:14.480 --> 00:51:18.400
<v Speaker 3>That list is what's cited at Trollo in six point

966
00:51:18.440 --> 00:51:21.639
<v Speaker 3>ninety two, which is normative for the Orthodox Church, and

967
00:51:21.679 --> 00:51:24.639
<v Speaker 3>then Trollo is affirmed at the Seventh Ecumenical Council in

968
00:51:24.679 --> 00:51:28.320
<v Speaker 3>seven eighty seven. So this is the basis for the

969
00:51:28.360 --> 00:51:33.280
<v Speaker 3>canon of scriptures according to the Universal Ecumenical Catholic Church

970
00:51:33.719 --> 00:51:39.519
<v Speaker 3>in the first eight centuries. This right here, So perhaps

971
00:51:39.519 --> 00:51:43.559
<v Speaker 3>we should familiarize ourselves with the Apostolic canons, because as

972
00:51:43.599 --> 00:51:45.960
<v Speaker 3>I read through these, oh, it turns out this is

973
00:51:46.000 --> 00:51:57.039
<v Speaker 3>all orthodox stuff. Presbyter bishop, deacon, episcopate, Eucharist, heretics, excommunicated Eucharist,

974
00:51:58.000 --> 00:52:05.000
<v Speaker 3>on and on and on, nothing to do with protestantsm

975
00:52:05.119 --> 00:52:10.159
<v Speaker 3>And what's the eighty fifth canon? The list of the

976
00:52:10.159 --> 00:52:13.519
<v Speaker 3>canonical scriptures, including the Dudro Canon, not the Protestant Canon.

977
00:52:13.719 --> 00:52:18.679
<v Speaker 16>Where talking to a Protestant and they are like very

978
00:52:18.719 --> 00:52:21.079
<v Speaker 16>adamant that like every single thing that we need to

979
00:52:21.159 --> 00:52:24.440
<v Speaker 16>know about the Christian life and faith is in scripture

980
00:52:24.480 --> 00:52:27.039
<v Speaker 16>and that we don't need like con traditions and stuff

981
00:52:27.039 --> 00:52:29.480
<v Speaker 16>like that. How do you responded, at.

982
00:52:30.119 --> 00:52:32.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, if everything that we knew was in scripture, then

983
00:52:32.559 --> 00:52:35.480
<v Speaker 3>the list of the canonical books would be in scripture.

984
00:52:36.519 --> 00:52:38.400
<v Speaker 3>If everything that we needed to know was in scripture,

985
00:52:38.440 --> 00:52:42.599
<v Speaker 3>then we would have, you know, all of the later

986
00:52:43.639 --> 00:52:47.159
<v Speaker 3>necessary doctrines that are formulated at like at Nica about

987
00:52:47.159 --> 00:52:50.000
<v Speaker 3>the Trinity, the Dear Christ. They would have also been

988
00:52:50.039 --> 00:52:53.559
<v Speaker 3>explicit in the scriptures, but they're not. So where was that,

989
00:52:53.599 --> 00:52:56.880
<v Speaker 3>for example, where's the New Testament statement on how we

990
00:52:57.000 --> 00:53:00.880
<v Speaker 3>worship explicitly in the church. We know from Leviticus when

991
00:53:00.920 --> 00:53:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Nate and Abayehir are killed that God takes the worship

992
00:53:04.039 --> 00:53:08.639
<v Speaker 3>very seriously. Uh so did he not tell us an

993
00:53:08.679 --> 00:53:11.320
<v Speaker 3>actual pattern of liturgical worship in the New Testament? If

994
00:53:11.320 --> 00:53:14.000
<v Speaker 3>protestant Ism is true, that would be the first thing

995
00:53:14.000 --> 00:53:17.079
<v Speaker 3>that we have in the New Testament is a clear

996
00:53:17.199 --> 00:53:20.000
<v Speaker 3>list of how we're supposed to worship. And yet there

997
00:53:20.119 --> 00:53:25.000
<v Speaker 3>is no liturgical pattern explicitly given in the New Testament.

998
00:53:25.400 --> 00:53:28.280
<v Speaker 3>Has never occurred to a Protestant. God's willing to kill

999
00:53:28.360 --> 00:53:30.880
<v Speaker 3>Nate and Abahu over this question, but he doesn't even

1000
00:53:30.880 --> 00:53:34.800
<v Speaker 3>give the church an actual pattern of worship. Were no, dude.

1001
00:53:34.800 --> 00:53:37.199
<v Speaker 13>They were supposed to go into the church, the house

1002
00:53:37.280 --> 00:53:39.159
<v Speaker 13>church bro and they were supposed to make it up

1003
00:53:39.199 --> 00:53:41.960
<v Speaker 13>and get a smoke machine in the laser lights, and

1004
00:53:42.039 --> 00:53:44.199
<v Speaker 13>did a Paul the apostle went and got a bunch

1005
00:53:44.199 --> 00:53:46.159
<v Speaker 13>of the laser lights, and he put it into the

1006
00:53:46.199 --> 00:53:49.960
<v Speaker 13>house church. And they was doing whatever they wanted dude.

1007
00:53:50.280 --> 00:53:52.519
<v Speaker 3>That was my boomer evangelical voice.

1008
00:53:52.239 --> 00:53:57.079
<v Speaker 17>There, so hi ja hey, I wanted to ask a

1009
00:53:57.159 --> 00:54:01.559
<v Speaker 17>couple of questions. So I was taught by my prof

1010
00:54:01.760 --> 00:54:05.239
<v Speaker 17>that in Saint John of Vaskin's work on Holy images,

1011
00:54:05.679 --> 00:54:08.760
<v Speaker 17>he states that the saints are present inside the icons.

1012
00:54:09.239 --> 00:54:11.760
<v Speaker 17>This so implied that the saints are actually omni present,

1013
00:54:11.920 --> 00:54:14.599
<v Speaker 17>because you could have like multiple images of Saint Luke

1014
00:54:14.639 --> 00:54:16.840
<v Speaker 17>and he would be in all of these icons. So

1015
00:54:16.880 --> 00:54:20.000
<v Speaker 17>my question would be, can only holy beings or I

1016
00:54:20.039 --> 00:54:22.960
<v Speaker 17>guess like elohem is probably the best word to describe it,

1017
00:54:23.039 --> 00:54:23.920
<v Speaker 17>be omni present.

1018
00:54:24.519 --> 00:54:27.920
<v Speaker 3>So the saints are deified, and so they're present via

1019
00:54:28.199 --> 00:54:32.280
<v Speaker 3>the divine energies because they're divide. So they're not present

1020
00:54:33.559 --> 00:54:37.559
<v Speaker 3>because they're God in a natural in a sense of

1021
00:54:37.559 --> 00:54:40.000
<v Speaker 3>divine nature, but they participate in the divine energies, which

1022
00:54:40.000 --> 00:54:42.440
<v Speaker 3>allows them to be deified, which allows them to be

1023
00:54:43.000 --> 00:54:46.159
<v Speaker 3>in a mystical way present. And that's why if you

1024
00:54:46.199 --> 00:54:49.239
<v Speaker 3>read Revelation five through nine, when John seas into heaven

1025
00:54:49.280 --> 00:54:52.119
<v Speaker 3>on the Lord's Day, he's on earth, but he's in

1026
00:54:52.159 --> 00:54:55.320
<v Speaker 3>the presence of the heavenly liturgy. So we believe that

1027
00:54:55.880 --> 00:54:59.519
<v Speaker 3>the liturgy is heaven on Earth literally, and God is

1028
00:54:59.519 --> 00:55:02.360
<v Speaker 3>able to do that because he's God and he can

1029
00:55:02.440 --> 00:55:05.400
<v Speaker 3>bring heaven down to earth and the incarnation. So no,

1030
00:55:05.519 --> 00:55:09.320
<v Speaker 3>it's not omnipresence to be in the outside of time

1031
00:55:09.360 --> 00:55:09.800
<v Speaker 3>and space.

1032
00:55:12.920 --> 00:55:15.199
<v Speaker 17>So what do you mean by I'm just confused by

1033
00:55:15.199 --> 00:55:17.960
<v Speaker 17>what you mean by deified? Like they they're given like

1034
00:55:18.000 --> 00:55:20.639
<v Speaker 17>a not a godhood necessarily.

1035
00:55:20.119 --> 00:55:24.280
<v Speaker 3>But like well, Jesus says in Jesus says in John

1036
00:55:24.320 --> 00:55:27.079
<v Speaker 3>seventeen that he came to give us a share, a

1037
00:55:27.119 --> 00:55:29.639
<v Speaker 3>real participation in the glory that he had with the

1038
00:55:29.679 --> 00:55:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Father before the foundation of the world. Jesus says, I

1039
00:55:32.519 --> 00:55:35.960
<v Speaker 3>have said ye are gods to the Pharisees, and Peter

1040
00:55:36.039 --> 00:55:38.639
<v Speaker 3>says that we've become partakers of the divine nature. So

1041
00:55:39.360 --> 00:55:42.320
<v Speaker 3>that's deification. Thats theosis you really do become immortal.

1042
00:55:45.000 --> 00:55:47.639
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I guess I'm just confused between what you mean by.

1043
00:55:47.559 --> 00:55:54.079
<v Speaker 17>Like immortal versus like the understanding of like being in

1044
00:55:54.159 --> 00:55:55.400
<v Speaker 17>multiple places at once.

1045
00:55:55.599 --> 00:55:57.320
<v Speaker 2>For me, I guess would confuse me.

1046
00:55:57.519 --> 00:56:01.400
<v Speaker 3>So again, are the saints in heaven on earth or not?

1047
00:56:02.400 --> 00:56:04.880
<v Speaker 3>In Revelation five to nine, Huh, they're not.

1048
00:56:05.360 --> 00:56:06.079
<v Speaker 6>They're not on earth.

1049
00:56:06.760 --> 00:56:09.559
<v Speaker 3>I don't remember. Well, how is there an altar on

1050
00:56:09.679 --> 00:56:11.719
<v Speaker 3>earth in Hebrews thirteen.

1051
00:56:13.800 --> 00:56:14.679
<v Speaker 2>So they're in heaven.

1052
00:56:15.679 --> 00:56:18.119
<v Speaker 3>Heaven comes down to earth in the liturgy. That's what

1053
00:56:18.119 --> 00:56:23.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to say. Oh, okay, When John in Revelations

1054
00:56:23.280 --> 00:56:26.559
<v Speaker 3>five to nine is praying in the spirit on the

1055
00:56:26.559 --> 00:56:29.920
<v Speaker 3>Lord's Day, he's doing the liturgy and he sees into

1056
00:56:29.920 --> 00:56:33.880
<v Speaker 3>heaven and he sees the heavenly liturgy opened up. That

1057
00:56:33.960 --> 00:56:37.599
<v Speaker 3>he's in heaven. So Heaven comes down to us in

1058
00:56:37.639 --> 00:56:39.440
<v Speaker 3>the liturgy, and that's how the saints are present.

1059
00:56:42.039 --> 00:56:44.639
<v Speaker 17>Okay, that makes a bit more sense. I'm still kind

1060
00:56:44.679 --> 00:56:45.960
<v Speaker 17>of confused, but it's okay.

1061
00:56:46.000 --> 00:56:46.760
<v Speaker 2>I have to read more.

1062
00:56:46.960 --> 00:56:50.039
<v Speaker 3>So we'll read Revelation five through nine and think about

1063
00:56:50.079 --> 00:56:54.840
<v Speaker 3>that as the heavenly worship service being also on earth.

1064
00:56:55.199 --> 00:56:57.840
<v Speaker 3>We are raised up into heaven. This incarnation, the incarnation,

1065
00:56:57.880 --> 00:57:01.159
<v Speaker 3>brings Heaven to earth and us into heaven. Heaven is

1066
00:57:01.159 --> 00:57:03.679
<v Speaker 3>already here, so it's now the Kingdom of God is

1067
00:57:03.760 --> 00:57:07.719
<v Speaker 3>on earth. It's the church, it's the liturgy. So when

1068
00:57:07.719 --> 00:57:09.320
<v Speaker 3>Paul says, and he was thirteen, that we have an

1069
00:57:09.400 --> 00:57:12.599
<v Speaker 3>altar that we eat from, that the people who serve

1070
00:57:12.639 --> 00:57:15.440
<v Speaker 3>the tabernacle have no right to eat, he's saying that's

1071
00:57:15.480 --> 00:57:17.840
<v Speaker 3>the same altar. What I'm arguing is that that's the

1072
00:57:17.880 --> 00:57:20.880
<v Speaker 3>same altar that John sees in heaven when he sees

1073
00:57:20.920 --> 00:57:23.039
<v Speaker 3>the Lamb slain in heaven. Why is there a lamb

1074
00:57:23.079 --> 00:57:27.440
<v Speaker 3>slain in heaven? When John sees that if Protestantism is true,

1075
00:57:27.880 --> 00:57:32.159
<v Speaker 3>the sacrifice is already complete. Bro there's no continuation of

1076
00:57:32.199 --> 00:57:37.079
<v Speaker 3>that or perpetuation of that. But yet John sees into

1077
00:57:37.079 --> 00:57:39.320
<v Speaker 3>heaven and he sees the Lamb slain in heaven, and

1078
00:57:39.360 --> 00:57:41.960
<v Speaker 3>he sees an altar, and he sees saints praying for

1079
00:57:42.000 --> 00:57:45.079
<v Speaker 3>the Church on earth. There's saints under the altar praying

1080
00:57:45.159 --> 00:57:48.199
<v Speaker 3>for the saints, the offering the prayers of the saints

1081
00:57:48.239 --> 00:57:52.920
<v Speaker 3>on earth to God. Do you understand when I'm talking

1082
00:57:52.960 --> 00:57:53.400
<v Speaker 3>about or not?

1083
00:57:54.519 --> 00:57:54.760
<v Speaker 15>Uh?

1084
00:57:55.480 --> 00:57:56.119
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah?

1085
00:57:56.400 --> 00:57:59.440
<v Speaker 17>Kind of, it's I don't know.

1086
00:58:00.960 --> 00:58:03.840
<v Speaker 3>What I'm saying is that in Hebrews thirteen, Paul talks

1087
00:58:03.880 --> 00:58:08.039
<v Speaker 3>about there being an alter on earth where we eat,

1088
00:58:08.320 --> 00:58:11.280
<v Speaker 3>and I'm saying that that's the same alter that's in

1089
00:58:11.360 --> 00:58:16.920
<v Speaker 3>heaven in the Book of Revelation that John sees. You're

1090
00:58:16.960 --> 00:58:18.159
<v Speaker 3>not you don't understand what I'm saying.

1091
00:58:19.199 --> 00:58:21.440
<v Speaker 17>I mean, kind of the thing that I'm kind of

1092
00:58:21.440 --> 00:58:24.239
<v Speaker 17>fogging on is whether, like heaven is on earth right now,

1093
00:58:24.400 --> 00:58:27.079
<v Speaker 17>because when you hear like, oh, he will wipe every

1094
00:58:27.639 --> 00:58:30.800
<v Speaker 17>tear from their eye, people still weep today, and so

1095
00:58:30.960 --> 00:58:31.400
<v Speaker 17>how can.

1096
00:58:31.320 --> 00:58:33.639
<v Speaker 3>We That doesn't mean that, right, And that's why Paul

1097
00:58:33.719 --> 00:58:36.679
<v Speaker 3>says that even though he ascended, we do not yet

1098
00:58:36.719 --> 00:58:39.519
<v Speaker 3>see all things subjected to him. In Corinthians, so there's

1099
00:58:39.559 --> 00:58:43.480
<v Speaker 3>a process of working this out in history even though

1100
00:58:43.480 --> 00:58:44.760
<v Speaker 3>the work is already complete.

1101
00:58:48.159 --> 00:58:50.239
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Or does Paul say that.

1102
00:58:53.400 --> 00:58:56.519
<v Speaker 3>Right now our first Corinthian. I'm going for a memory

1103
00:58:56.519 --> 00:59:00.400
<v Speaker 3>of first Corinthians. Right now we see we do not

1104
00:59:00.480 --> 00:59:03.360
<v Speaker 3>yet see all things subjected to him even though he

1105
00:59:03.559 --> 00:59:12.559
<v Speaker 3>is ascended. Is it first Greendi is fifteen Okay?

1106
00:59:12.679 --> 00:59:15.760
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, I was just wondering because my prophet is basically

1107
00:59:15.800 --> 00:59:16.519
<v Speaker 17>talking first.

1108
00:59:16.639 --> 00:59:19.639
<v Speaker 3>Is fifteen twenty eight. We all now when all things

1109
00:59:19.639 --> 00:59:24.159
<v Speaker 3>are made subject to him. Excuse me, it's Hebrews too,

1110
00:59:24.199 --> 00:59:27.199
<v Speaker 3>where he says that even though all things are subject

1111
00:59:27.239 --> 00:59:29.519
<v Speaker 3>to him, we do not yet see all things in

1112
00:59:29.639 --> 00:59:32.599
<v Speaker 3>history subjected to him. But all things are subjected to

1113
00:59:32.679 --> 00:59:37.000
<v Speaker 3>him when he rose on the cross instead of the

1114
00:59:37.079 --> 00:59:38.599
<v Speaker 3>right hand of the father, so he began to reign

1115
00:59:38.639 --> 00:59:39.880
<v Speaker 3>when he ascended, right.

1116
00:59:41.239 --> 00:59:45.880
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, Okay, that makes a bit more sense. I think

1117
00:59:46.079 --> 00:59:48.960
<v Speaker 17>my prop was just really throwing me off because we

1118
00:59:48.960 --> 00:59:53.639
<v Speaker 17>were learning about how basically in Mesopotamia they believe that

1119
00:59:54.159 --> 00:59:55.679
<v Speaker 17>God would reside.

1120
00:59:55.280 --> 00:59:57.599
<v Speaker 2>In an idol that you made, and then she made.

1121
00:59:57.440 --> 01:00:00.840
<v Speaker 17>The illusion that the Orthodox believe the same thing, and

1122
01:00:00.880 --> 01:00:04.280
<v Speaker 17>therefore it's like incongruent because of the fact that you

1123
01:00:04.320 --> 01:00:08.760
<v Speaker 17>can't have like multiple idols of a human, and then

1124
01:00:09.159 --> 01:00:12.559
<v Speaker 17>there would be the human would literally be inside the idol,

1125
01:00:12.599 --> 01:00:15.800
<v Speaker 17>and then that would cause that made me a little

1126
01:00:15.800 --> 01:00:17.079
<v Speaker 17>confused because it was like what the heck.

1127
01:00:18.039 --> 01:00:19.920
<v Speaker 3>So well, even in the Old Testament, if you read

1128
01:00:19.960 --> 01:00:22.400
<v Speaker 3>the Benjamin Summer book, he admits that the Old Testament

1129
01:00:22.519 --> 01:00:26.440
<v Speaker 3>shows that there's a fluidity to the bodies and the

1130
01:00:26.440 --> 01:00:28.840
<v Speaker 3>embodiment of God throughout the Old Testament, in terms of

1131
01:00:29.119 --> 01:00:32.320
<v Speaker 3>the Theophanes, even to the point of multiple objects in

1132
01:00:32.360 --> 01:00:35.360
<v Speaker 3>the Old Testament like the oak of Mammary or like

1133
01:00:35.400 --> 01:00:38.679
<v Speaker 3>the stone that's anointed that Jacob Laze's head on, like

1134
01:00:38.760 --> 01:00:41.920
<v Speaker 3>all of these are examples of sacramental things even in

1135
01:00:41.960 --> 01:00:45.519
<v Speaker 3>the Old Testament, so that's preposterous. And even in terms

1136
01:00:45.559 --> 01:00:46.760
<v Speaker 3>of the Old Covenant.

1137
01:00:48.880 --> 01:00:53.199
<v Speaker 17>Well, basically the argument was that God, although he was

1138
01:00:53.320 --> 01:00:55.880
<v Speaker 17>kind of omnipresent. In the beginning, he began to reside

1139
01:00:55.880 --> 01:00:59.079
<v Speaker 17>in the tabernacle, and now he resides in the uchurs,

1140
01:00:59.119 --> 01:01:01.400
<v Speaker 17>which I don't necessarily fully believe because I think he's

1141
01:01:01.719 --> 01:01:02.599
<v Speaker 17>entirely omnipresent.

1142
01:01:02.599 --> 01:01:05.360
<v Speaker 2>But he's also literally inside the euchurs as well. So

1143
01:01:05.519 --> 01:01:06.119
<v Speaker 2>it's just.

1144
01:01:06.119 --> 01:01:10.559
<v Speaker 3>Really this is false either oars. So yeah, I mean,

1145
01:01:10.599 --> 01:01:13.639
<v Speaker 3>I'll let you talk. Just second, father Digon, so false either, oars,

1146
01:01:13.679 --> 01:01:16.599
<v Speaker 3>Because Jesus didn't cease to be omniscient if you read

1147
01:01:16.639 --> 01:01:20.440
<v Speaker 3>Philippians too, when he engaged in the canosis, right, So

1148
01:01:20.480 --> 01:01:23.920
<v Speaker 3>the Philippins, who's the canosis passes where he willfully limits

1149
01:01:24.000 --> 01:01:27.679
<v Speaker 3>himself to be in a mode of being born as

1150
01:01:27.719 --> 01:01:30.519
<v Speaker 3>a humans, as a man. Right, So he's in the

1151
01:01:30.559 --> 01:01:33.280
<v Speaker 3>form of God, Paul says in Philippins, Who's he never

1152
01:01:33.360 --> 01:01:36.360
<v Speaker 3>ceases to be divine or loses on the presence, but

1153
01:01:36.559 --> 01:01:40.159
<v Speaker 3>he's in a special mode of his presence in the incarnation.

1154
01:01:40.320 --> 01:01:42.360
<v Speaker 3>And it's the same with the church or the sacraments.

1155
01:01:42.679 --> 01:01:43.320
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, father.

1156
01:01:43.239 --> 01:01:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Digon, Well, I was gonna say.

1157
01:01:45.599 --> 01:01:49.039
<v Speaker 11>Even just kind of Greek metaphysics, he can get an idea.

1158
01:01:49.679 --> 01:01:53.960
<v Speaker 11>For example, there's one form of triangle writing triangle or

1159
01:01:54.039 --> 01:01:59.199
<v Speaker 11>something like that that transcends space and times, let's say it.

1160
01:02:00.599 --> 01:02:03.840
<v Speaker 11>But there's many instances of that one form in particular

1161
01:02:04.679 --> 01:02:07.440
<v Speaker 11>material in stantiations, which is kind of like you were saying,

1162
01:02:07.519 --> 01:02:08.159
<v Speaker 11>like the mode.

1163
01:02:08.800 --> 01:02:10.320
<v Speaker 2>So this is why it's really important.

1164
01:02:11.159 --> 01:02:15.639
<v Speaker 11>It's not completely analogous, but this is why it's really important,

1165
01:02:15.719 --> 01:02:19.320
<v Speaker 11>whether it's what you were talking with the individual prior

1166
01:02:19.559 --> 01:02:25.360
<v Speaker 11>or this a notion of kind of Greek metaphysics and

1167
01:02:25.440 --> 01:02:26.639
<v Speaker 11>philosophy kind of.

1168
01:02:28.079 --> 01:02:32.639
<v Speaker 2>It breaks up and clears the way from these things

1169
01:02:32.679 --> 01:02:35.039
<v Speaker 2>being kind of hang ups. Do you see what I'm saying.

1170
01:02:36.119 --> 01:02:39.480
<v Speaker 11>So what I'm saying is that that particular triangle, even

1171
01:02:39.519 --> 01:02:42.880
<v Speaker 11>though there's one form of triangle, doesn't mean that the

1172
01:02:42.960 --> 01:02:44.599
<v Speaker 11>triangle itself.

1173
01:02:44.199 --> 01:02:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Is omni present. Does that make sense?

1174
01:02:48.719 --> 01:02:48.840
<v Speaker 16>Uh?

1175
01:02:49.719 --> 01:02:50.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, sort of.

1176
01:02:51.440 --> 01:02:55.400
<v Speaker 3>So there's many triangles, right, they're all triangles. That doesn't

1177
01:02:55.440 --> 01:02:59.360
<v Speaker 3>mean triangle is omnipresence, right yeah.

1178
01:02:59.599 --> 01:03:03.559
<v Speaker 17>Okay, Well, because I believe that christis in the Eucharist,

1179
01:03:03.599 --> 01:03:06.880
<v Speaker 17>and also God can be outside of the eu Christ.

1180
01:03:06.719 --> 01:03:09.960
<v Speaker 2>At the same time too, But like obviously.

1181
01:03:09.519 --> 01:03:11.880
<v Speaker 17>My prophe is kind of out to lunch on some things,

1182
01:03:12.039 --> 01:03:18.039
<v Speaker 17>which is okay, but yeah, that was just what really

1183
01:03:18.039 --> 01:03:20.599
<v Speaker 17>confused me about it. Because saints, at the end of

1184
01:03:20.639 --> 01:03:22.440
<v Speaker 17>the day are human and not God.

1185
01:03:22.519 --> 01:03:23.199
<v Speaker 18>So I want to.

1186
01:03:24.800 --> 01:03:26.119
<v Speaker 2>Another either or jam.

1187
01:03:26.199 --> 01:03:33.719
<v Speaker 11>I always bring this up that Christ is God in

1188
01:03:33.800 --> 01:03:37.800
<v Speaker 11>one sense, is on the presence, right, he transcends all

1189
01:03:37.840 --> 01:03:41.400
<v Speaker 11>space and time, is the divine person and having the

1190
01:03:41.400 --> 01:03:47.599
<v Speaker 11>divine essence. But Christ walking on the road to in

1191
01:03:47.719 --> 01:03:49.960
<v Speaker 11>Jerusalem is not.

1192
01:03:51.440 --> 01:03:56.480
<v Speaker 2>In essence. Do you see what I mean? Yeah? Yeah, yeah,

1193
01:03:57.320 --> 01:04:02.079
<v Speaker 2>So it's it makes this kind of either or it's like, well,

1194
01:04:02.119 --> 01:04:04.079
<v Speaker 2>he has a special mode in.

1195
01:04:03.920 --> 01:04:09.800
<v Speaker 11>The physical person of Jesus of Nazareth such that he

1196
01:04:10.039 --> 01:04:13.079
<v Speaker 11>is actually in Jerusalem and not in athletes well, at

1197
01:04:13.119 --> 01:04:16.840
<v Speaker 11>the same time, in a different respect, because he's divined,

1198
01:04:17.079 --> 01:04:24.320
<v Speaker 11>he is omnipresent, and so likewise with the saints too,

1199
01:04:24.519 --> 01:04:28.000
<v Speaker 11>is that yeah, there's a physical but they're also united

1200
01:04:29.880 --> 01:04:34.440
<v Speaker 11>with with God, and so they have properties that would

1201
01:04:34.440 --> 01:04:39.199
<v Speaker 11>transcend normal physical properties.

1202
01:04:40.159 --> 01:04:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Being in the particular icon or when they were living,

1203
01:04:42.800 --> 01:04:43.280
<v Speaker 2>et cetera.

1204
01:04:43.480 --> 01:04:46.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, again, Revelation five through nine, you'll see that the

1205
01:04:46.480 --> 01:04:49.039
<v Speaker 3>saints on earth are aware of and know what's going

1206
01:04:49.079 --> 01:04:51.719
<v Speaker 3>on with the Church militant the Church on earth, and

1207
01:04:51.760 --> 01:04:55.519
<v Speaker 3>they pray for them. So again it's the Bible itself

1208
01:04:55.519 --> 01:04:58.079
<v Speaker 3>that's telling us that the saints in heaven are involved

1209
01:04:58.119 --> 01:05:00.800
<v Speaker 3>in the earthly worship of the Church and know what's

1210
01:05:00.840 --> 01:05:04.320
<v Speaker 3>going on, and so Protestants yourself typically think of the

1211
01:05:04.320 --> 01:05:07.199
<v Speaker 3>Book of Revelation as a liturgical book or that is,

1212
01:05:07.239 --> 01:05:09.440
<v Speaker 3>describing an actual heavenly worship service.

1213
01:05:10.000 --> 01:05:14.440
<v Speaker 19>I was raised Protestant, and I've gone to some Orthodox churches,

1214
01:05:14.480 --> 01:05:19.960
<v Speaker 19>and the most difficult thing for me to logically reconcile

1215
01:05:20.840 --> 01:05:24.800
<v Speaker 19>is the involvement of Mary or the Theotokos and the

1216
01:05:24.800 --> 01:05:29.679
<v Speaker 19>principle of intercession. I guess my feeling about it, or

1217
01:05:29.679 --> 01:05:34.000
<v Speaker 19>the way that I interpret that, is that it seems

1218
01:05:34.000 --> 01:05:38.599
<v Speaker 19>like it implies a kind of lackadaisicalness about God, or

1219
01:05:38.599 --> 01:05:43.480
<v Speaker 19>that his judgment or decisions to you know, affect somebody's

1220
01:05:43.559 --> 01:05:48.480
<v Speaker 19>life could be changed through the kind of like willful

1221
01:05:48.559 --> 01:05:51.639
<v Speaker 19>suggestion of this other being.

1222
01:05:51.800 --> 01:05:54.239
<v Speaker 3>I mean, does that not happen in the Old Testament

1223
01:05:54.280 --> 01:05:57.440
<v Speaker 3>when God tells Amos that had you not interceded for Israel,

1224
01:05:57.519 --> 01:05:59.639
<v Speaker 3>I would have destroyed them. But because you're my friend

1225
01:05:59.679 --> 01:06:02.519
<v Speaker 3>and I respect you, you interceded for Israel. I choose

1226
01:06:02.519 --> 01:06:05.840
<v Speaker 3>to answer your prayers. So it's that God wills to

1227
01:06:06.000 --> 01:06:09.679
<v Speaker 3>descend to or seem me to condescend to respond reciprocally

1228
01:06:09.719 --> 01:06:11.920
<v Speaker 3>to our prayers. And I just pointed out to the

1229
01:06:11.920 --> 01:06:14.599
<v Speaker 3>previous girl. Revelation five or nine shows the saints in

1230
01:06:14.639 --> 01:06:17.320
<v Speaker 3>heaven praying for the Church on earth. God wills to

1231
01:06:17.400 --> 01:06:20.400
<v Speaker 3>hear their prayers their incense offered in heaven up to him.

1232
01:06:20.760 --> 01:06:23.239
<v Speaker 3>The angels are offering the incense of the prayers. So

1233
01:06:24.000 --> 01:06:26.559
<v Speaker 3>it's a false assumption that it's either or, as if

1234
01:06:26.599 --> 01:06:31.079
<v Speaker 3>God could only do it through direct causal action, like

1235
01:06:31.159 --> 01:06:34.679
<v Speaker 3>he can't will to interact with human beings. I mean,

1236
01:06:34.679 --> 01:06:37.239
<v Speaker 3>God could have chosen to not have any apostles and

1237
01:06:37.320 --> 01:06:39.480
<v Speaker 3>just sent down a book like Muslims think or something.

1238
01:06:39.679 --> 01:06:41.840
<v Speaker 3>But he chose and said to have apostles. And Paul

1239
01:06:41.920 --> 01:06:44.239
<v Speaker 3>says that he's a co worker with Christ. Is that

1240
01:06:44.320 --> 01:06:47.599
<v Speaker 3>Paul detracting from God's glory because he's a coworker.

1241
01:06:48.960 --> 01:06:51.400
<v Speaker 19>If that were the case, I guess I'm just curious

1242
01:06:51.440 --> 01:06:53.920
<v Speaker 19>when it says that no one comes to the Father

1243
01:06:54.000 --> 01:06:57.440
<v Speaker 19>except through me, I guess that's somewhat in reference to

1244
01:06:57.719 --> 01:06:59.760
<v Speaker 19>salvation or something like that.

1245
01:06:59.679 --> 01:07:03.039
<v Speaker 3>But it well, all the all the saints are part

1246
01:07:03.079 --> 01:07:05.480
<v Speaker 3>of the Communion of Saints, and so they're coming to

1247
01:07:05.639 --> 01:07:11.079
<v Speaker 3>God through Christ. As well, So it's not apart from Christ.

1248
01:07:11.280 --> 01:07:15.440
<v Speaker 19>What do you mean, I guess I mean, like us

1249
01:07:15.559 --> 01:07:18.320
<v Speaker 19>as people who are not saints, just regular people.

1250
01:07:19.760 --> 01:07:21.559
<v Speaker 2>It seems odd to have like.

1251
01:07:21.719 --> 01:07:27.679
<v Speaker 19>A alternative route to have your life, like again improved

1252
01:07:27.760 --> 01:07:31.800
<v Speaker 19>upon or something, given that one particular verse like no

1253
01:07:31.840 --> 01:07:33.519
<v Speaker 19>one comes to the Father except through me.

1254
01:07:34.960 --> 01:07:37.440
<v Speaker 3>So does that verse exclude all the other verses? I mean?

1255
01:07:37.480 --> 01:07:40.400
<v Speaker 3>And when in Revelation eight, when the angels are offering

1256
01:07:40.440 --> 01:07:44.239
<v Speaker 3>the prayers of the saints, is that contradicting the verse

1257
01:07:44.280 --> 01:07:45.719
<v Speaker 3>in John fourteen six?

1258
01:07:47.440 --> 01:07:48.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't know. That's why I called in,

1259
01:07:49.000 --> 01:07:50.119
<v Speaker 2>Like I said, this is this is a.

1260
01:07:50.079 --> 01:07:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Little we don't take one verse and we don't. So

1261
01:07:53.559 --> 01:07:56.360
<v Speaker 3>it's a Protestant heretical approach to take one verse and

1262
01:07:56.400 --> 01:07:58.960
<v Speaker 3>squeeze all the other texts into that one. You have

1263
01:07:58.960 --> 01:08:00.239
<v Speaker 3>to harmonize all the texts.

1264
01:08:01.079 --> 01:08:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Right, Okay? Because salvation's the source of salvation, is the

1265
01:08:07.360 --> 01:08:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Trinity a triadic.

1266
01:08:10.800 --> 01:08:16.680
<v Speaker 11>That that's going to that that notion of community is

1267
01:08:16.800 --> 01:08:18.279
<v Speaker 11>going to be played.

1268
01:08:17.960 --> 01:08:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Out in the world too.

1269
01:08:20.760 --> 01:08:24.640
<v Speaker 11>You're going to see salvation triadically within a community in

1270
01:08:24.800 --> 01:08:28.760
<v Speaker 11>people too, and not just two people or you know,

1271
01:08:28.880 --> 01:08:33.119
<v Speaker 11>one or one cause let's say, well, it's just it's

1272
01:08:33.199 --> 01:08:33.720
<v Speaker 11>just God.

1273
01:08:34.680 --> 01:08:37.079
<v Speaker 2>So I would I would say, it's this.

1274
01:08:37.159 --> 01:08:41.159
<v Speaker 11>Notion of just me and Jesus is actually anti trinitarian.

1275
01:08:41.800 --> 01:08:45.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that's a great point, is it's not trinitarian. Also,

1276
01:08:45.319 --> 01:08:48.520
<v Speaker 3>it's like when Paul says to Timothy, you know, if

1277
01:08:48.560 --> 01:08:50.760
<v Speaker 3>you act well, you will save those around you.

1278
01:08:50.840 --> 01:08:50.960
<v Speaker 17>All.

1279
01:08:51.039 --> 01:08:54.039
<v Speaker 3>I guess he's distracting from the salvation in Christ. Paul's

1280
01:08:54.119 --> 01:08:57.760
<v Speaker 3>telling that that Timothy is an idol because he saves

1281
01:08:57.760 --> 01:09:01.720
<v Speaker 3>people and Christ doesn't. No, it's obviously it means through Christ,

1282
01:09:02.479 --> 01:09:06.199
<v Speaker 3>your co workers with God, Paul says. Paul even says

1283
01:09:06.199 --> 01:09:08.600
<v Speaker 3>that he fills up in his body the measure of

1284
01:09:08.600 --> 01:09:10.560
<v Speaker 3>what is lacking in the suffering of Christ.

1285
01:09:16.319 --> 01:09:20.119
<v Speaker 8>So I've got an argument with a couple of scriptures,

1286
01:09:20.479 --> 01:09:26.520
<v Speaker 8>an analogy to illustrate the point, a specific relevant historical event,

1287
01:09:27.159 --> 01:09:30.399
<v Speaker 8>and a follow up question and a bonus question. So

1288
01:09:30.439 --> 01:09:31.920
<v Speaker 8>if I could, I like to go through all of

1289
01:09:31.920 --> 01:09:36.439
<v Speaker 8>that and then get your feedback. So the argument would

1290
01:09:36.479 --> 01:09:42.000
<v Speaker 8>be that the normative authority of the churches has limits. Specifically,

1291
01:09:43.039 --> 01:09:45.960
<v Speaker 8>the churches do not have the authority to remove other

1292
01:09:46.039 --> 01:09:51.880
<v Speaker 8>churches from the church. The analogy would be the churches

1293
01:09:51.920 --> 01:09:55.199
<v Speaker 8>are parts of the body. Christ is the head of

1294
01:09:55.199 --> 01:09:58.880
<v Speaker 8>the body. The right arm cannot decide to remove the

1295
01:09:58.960 --> 01:10:02.680
<v Speaker 8>left arm. Only the head can decide to remove a

1296
01:10:02.720 --> 01:10:07.479
<v Speaker 8>part of the body. A couple of scriptures Matthew sixteen eighteen,

1297
01:10:07.960 --> 01:10:12.319
<v Speaker 8>I will build my church Revelation two five. If you

1298
01:10:12.359 --> 01:10:14.840
<v Speaker 8>do not repent, I will come to you and remove

1299
01:10:14.880 --> 01:10:20.960
<v Speaker 8>your landscane. Specific historical event that's relevant be the counsel

1300
01:10:21.279 --> 01:10:25.159
<v Speaker 8>of Chalcedon. So, with regards to being in or out

1301
01:10:25.159 --> 01:10:28.880
<v Speaker 8>of the body, what is the condition of the Coptic

1302
01:10:28.960 --> 01:10:34.800
<v Speaker 8>Christians immediately after Chalcedon? Specifically, are Christians who have no

1303
01:10:34.840 --> 01:10:38.399
<v Speaker 8>idea of this meeting impacted by way of their bishop?

1304
01:10:39.159 --> 01:10:42.840
<v Speaker 8>And are Christians who do not understand the distinction impacted

1305
01:10:42.840 --> 01:10:43.960
<v Speaker 8>by their ignorance?

1306
01:10:45.680 --> 01:10:50.119
<v Speaker 2>I could do follow up question or keep going, all right.

1307
01:10:50.119 --> 01:10:53.720
<v Speaker 3>First of all, it's a false analogy that because Paul

1308
01:10:53.760 --> 01:10:56.359
<v Speaker 3>says to the Corinthians that the hand can't say to

1309
01:10:56.439 --> 01:10:58.359
<v Speaker 3>the arm or eyes or whatever. I don't need you

1310
01:10:58.520 --> 01:11:02.600
<v Speaker 3>to equate that to no normative authority excommunicating anybody in

1311
01:11:02.640 --> 01:11:06.039
<v Speaker 3>the universal Church. That doesn't follow from that. The only

1312
01:11:06.079 --> 01:11:10.359
<v Speaker 3>ways by which people would be excommunicated is by living authorities.

1313
01:11:10.359 --> 01:11:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Who have the ability to excommunicate, which actually Paul says

1314
01:11:13.000 --> 01:11:16.319
<v Speaker 3>to the Corinthians put out of the church those who

1315
01:11:16.319 --> 01:11:19.760
<v Speaker 3>are disobedient and act unruly. So Paul actually tells the

1316
01:11:19.800 --> 01:11:23.239
<v Speaker 3>Church of corinth that they can and should excommunicate certain people.

1317
01:11:23.520 --> 01:11:27.079
<v Speaker 3>The Church consistently does excommunicate people from the first century

1318
01:11:27.119 --> 01:11:30.960
<v Speaker 3>to the third century, including local synods that talk about excommunication,

1319
01:11:31.039 --> 01:11:35.399
<v Speaker 3>including the Apostolic Canons which mentioned multiple things which are

1320
01:11:35.600 --> 01:11:39.399
<v Speaker 3>liable to excommunicate people. So it would really make no

1321
01:11:39.520 --> 01:11:42.159
<v Speaker 3>sense with all that data to take the text about

1322
01:11:42.239 --> 01:11:44.119
<v Speaker 3>the hands saying to the arm I don't need you,

1323
01:11:44.479 --> 01:11:48.319
<v Speaker 3>and to apply that to there's no such thing as

1324
01:11:48.479 --> 01:11:52.359
<v Speaker 3>excommunication in terms of normative authority. The Council of Nicea

1325
01:11:52.439 --> 01:11:55.399
<v Speaker 3>certainly thought that they had normative authority to excommunicate the Arians.

1326
01:11:55.840 --> 01:11:59.399
<v Speaker 3>So again, I don't think that follows from Nicia. You

1327
01:11:59.600 --> 01:12:02.479
<v Speaker 3>raise a question about whether or not God would hold

1328
01:12:02.479 --> 01:12:05.840
<v Speaker 3>everybody accountable who didn't know what their bishops were up

1329
01:12:05.840 --> 01:12:08.039
<v Speaker 3>to or never heard of calciton. No, I don't think

1330
01:12:08.079 --> 01:12:10.760
<v Speaker 3>that everybody who the day the calclon happened, like it's

1331
01:12:10.760 --> 01:12:13.720
<v Speaker 3>a blackout and suddenly they all are without grace and

1332
01:12:13.800 --> 01:12:15.840
<v Speaker 3>damned because they had no idea what was going on.

1333
01:12:16.000 --> 01:12:19.760
<v Speaker 3>God's not a being counter He's not a weird legalist

1334
01:12:19.880 --> 01:12:22.840
<v Speaker 3>like that. I think that just like, for example, with

1335
01:12:22.880 --> 01:12:25.520
<v Speaker 3>the Roman Catholic Church, I don't believe that everybody in

1336
01:12:25.520 --> 01:12:27.880
<v Speaker 3>the Latin West is automatically damned in ten fifty four.

1337
01:12:29.079 --> 01:12:30.880
<v Speaker 3>They had no idea what was going on. They didn't

1338
01:12:30.920 --> 01:12:34.560
<v Speaker 3>immediately all adopt a double eternal hypostatic procession that takes

1339
01:12:34.560 --> 01:12:38.159
<v Speaker 3>many centuries to actually filter out into the totality of

1340
01:12:38.199 --> 01:12:40.520
<v Speaker 3>the Roman Catholic West. So no, I think that even

1341
01:12:40.600 --> 01:12:43.000
<v Speaker 3>up into very late there were probably many people during

1342
01:12:43.000 --> 01:12:46.720
<v Speaker 3>those time periods in the West who are saints and

1343
01:12:46.760 --> 01:12:49.159
<v Speaker 3>who are in heaven. We may not necessarily have them

1344
01:12:49.199 --> 01:12:53.000
<v Speaker 3>as part of our Orthodox liturgical calendar, but that doesn't

1345
01:12:53.000 --> 01:12:56.760
<v Speaker 3>mean that they're not in heaven. So multiple different questions

1346
01:12:56.800 --> 01:12:59.000
<v Speaker 3>and sort of positions that are I think a little

1347
01:12:59.000 --> 01:13:02.159
<v Speaker 3>conflated going on that argument. So I'm not sure what

1348
01:13:02.319 --> 01:13:04.680
<v Speaker 3>that had to do with Postcalcidon.

1349
01:13:06.640 --> 01:13:09.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, that was just, you know, an analogy to maybe

1350
01:13:09.920 --> 01:13:14.399
<v Speaker 8>illustrate the point, but you definitely got the point. Follow

1351
01:13:14.479 --> 01:13:18.079
<v Speaker 8>up question, if I may are there limits to normitive

1352
01:13:18.079 --> 01:13:21.439
<v Speaker 8>authority regarding ex communication of any kind based.

1353
01:13:21.239 --> 01:13:21.800
<v Speaker 2>On what you just said.

1354
01:13:21.920 --> 01:13:24.079
<v Speaker 3>Sure, yeah, I mean did John Crystalson was an he

1355
01:13:24.479 --> 01:13:28.840
<v Speaker 3>sent out of Oak? He was falsely excommunicated. So yeah,

1356
01:13:28.840 --> 01:13:31.880
<v Speaker 3>that doesn't mean that everything a local bishop does is

1357
01:13:31.920 --> 01:13:36.640
<v Speaker 3>going to be right or authoritative, I mean right or infallible, should.

1358
01:13:36.399 --> 01:13:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Say, I guess I'm thinking more like.

1359
01:13:40.680 --> 01:13:45.520
<v Speaker 8>Not specific ex communications, but more like wholesale.

1360
01:13:47.239 --> 01:13:49.239
<v Speaker 2>You know, what do you mean this this whole church?

1361
01:13:49.279 --> 01:13:53.079
<v Speaker 8>Like you mentioned the Arian thing, but specifically like Chalcedon.

1362
01:13:53.159 --> 01:14:01.199
<v Speaker 8>It's a disagreement about Christology, I guess. And so I

1363
01:14:01.199 --> 01:14:07.800
<v Speaker 8>guess is there a principle in play? Where is there

1364
01:14:07.840 --> 01:14:12.239
<v Speaker 8>a principle that guides what's valid excommunication and what would

1365
01:14:12.279 --> 01:14:18.039
<v Speaker 8>be invalid excommunication? Like things Christology is definitely grounds for

1366
01:14:18.119 --> 01:14:23.039
<v Speaker 8>ex communication, practice of ordination is not grounds like is

1367
01:14:23.039 --> 01:14:25.119
<v Speaker 8>there kind of a guiding principle there of things that

1368
01:14:25.600 --> 01:14:26.600
<v Speaker 8>escalate to that level.

1369
01:14:27.239 --> 01:14:29.039
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what you mean by practice of ordination?

1370
01:14:29.279 --> 01:14:30.560
<v Speaker 3>What I mean just.

1371
01:14:30.520 --> 01:14:33.880
<v Speaker 2>A random example? I mean it could be. So.

1372
01:14:34.159 --> 01:14:37.279
<v Speaker 3>I think that the way it's supposed to work is

1373
01:14:37.680 --> 01:14:42.560
<v Speaker 3>that an Orthodox bishop is the highest authority strictly speaking,

1374
01:14:42.720 --> 01:14:45.560
<v Speaker 3>and he interprets the canons for the churches under his

1375
01:14:45.640 --> 01:14:51.159
<v Speaker 3>jurisdiction and applies those rules in an informed, wise way,

1376
01:14:51.279 --> 01:14:55.720
<v Speaker 3>not an illegalistic, rigid way, but in a way that

1377
01:14:56.000 --> 01:14:59.479
<v Speaker 3>is for the best of the flock and for their salvation.

1378
01:14:59.680 --> 01:15:02.560
<v Speaker 3>So could he abuse it? Yes, there could be an

1379
01:15:02.560 --> 01:15:05.880
<v Speaker 3>abusive bishop, but I think the idea is that eventually

1380
01:15:06.079 --> 01:15:08.840
<v Speaker 3>it would be rectified in time, that God would vindicate

1381
01:15:08.880 --> 01:15:14.000
<v Speaker 3>those who were wrong. For example, Chrysostom's erroneous condemnation by

1382
01:15:14.000 --> 01:15:19.079
<v Speaker 3>the Senate of the Oak or whatever. Eventually he gets vindicated.

1383
01:15:20.199 --> 01:15:22.279
<v Speaker 3>So beyond that, I don't know how to answer the

1384
01:15:22.359 --> 01:15:26.239
<v Speaker 3>question of like, how what the extents of a bishop's

1385
01:15:26.359 --> 01:15:28.920
<v Speaker 3>errors could be. I mean they could be anything from

1386
01:15:28.920 --> 01:15:34.159
<v Speaker 3>heresy to incorrectly you know, interpreting the cannons. I mean,

1387
01:15:34.199 --> 01:15:36.560
<v Speaker 3>all those things are Father, Deacon, you're you're a deacon.

1388
01:15:36.800 --> 01:15:39.720
<v Speaker 3>How would you how would you answer this question about

1389
01:15:40.079 --> 01:15:44.720
<v Speaker 3>the limits to normative authority amongst bishops and synods?

1390
01:15:46.640 --> 01:15:48.479
<v Speaker 2>Could you say, dis repeat it against her?

1391
01:15:48.520 --> 01:15:51.520
<v Speaker 11>I was writing that, I was writing three different arguments

1392
01:15:51.520 --> 01:15:54.600
<v Speaker 11>to three different people, three different times.

1393
01:15:55.640 --> 01:15:58.039
<v Speaker 2>My quantum.

1394
01:15:58.520 --> 01:16:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Ask Father Dicon. He's had much more involvement with bishops

1395
01:16:01.520 --> 01:16:03.800
<v Speaker 3>and clergy than I have, so he would be much

1396
01:16:03.800 --> 01:16:05.199
<v Speaker 3>better for this question. Than me.

1397
01:16:05.520 --> 01:16:07.520
<v Speaker 2>I think, I think, I think I know what you're

1398
01:16:07.520 --> 01:16:10.359
<v Speaker 2>saying about. Go ahead, So yeah, it would just be

1399
01:16:11.600 --> 01:16:14.479
<v Speaker 2>limits to normative authority. I think I understand.

1400
01:16:14.560 --> 01:16:19.439
<v Speaker 8>You know, within a jurisdiction, the bishop is the authority

1401
01:16:19.520 --> 01:16:22.680
<v Speaker 8>that decide what happens.

1402
01:16:22.319 --> 01:16:26.520
<v Speaker 2>And then your local bishop. Yeah. If if a whole.

1403
01:16:28.000 --> 01:16:33.520
<v Speaker 8>Congregation under a bishop is collectively an error, then the

1404
01:16:33.560 --> 01:16:36.439
<v Speaker 8>only other place to refer to is a collection of bishops,

1405
01:16:36.560 --> 01:16:37.960
<v Speaker 8>which would be a council.

1406
01:16:39.159 --> 01:16:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean, just just think about it. We do

1407
01:16:41.840 --> 01:16:43.239
<v Speaker 2>have a secular.

1408
01:16:44.840 --> 01:16:50.520
<v Speaker 11>Notion normative authority, which interesting enough, is based off a

1409
01:16:50.560 --> 01:16:56.119
<v Speaker 11>Byzantine law, So our legal system traces back to principles

1410
01:16:56.119 --> 01:17:00.920
<v Speaker 11>and Byzantine law. But you certainly have a nor normative authority,

1411
01:17:01.000 --> 01:17:10.319
<v Speaker 11>and that just means legally binding. So at what at

1412
01:17:10.319 --> 01:17:14.479
<v Speaker 11>a county level, I guess you have judges, and then

1413
01:17:14.520 --> 01:17:17.800
<v Speaker 11>your state has a supreme court, a state supreme court.

1414
01:17:18.840 --> 01:17:21.399
<v Speaker 2>And then your nation has a then at the highest

1415
01:17:21.640 --> 01:17:26.600
<v Speaker 2>level is scotus. This is the United States.

1416
01:17:26.720 --> 01:17:29.479
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So to take to take that analogy, I guess

1417
01:17:29.640 --> 01:17:32.119
<v Speaker 8>it comes down to interpretation. Because you could argue that

1418
01:17:32.159 --> 01:17:35.079
<v Speaker 8>the Constitution lays out the Bill of rights, those things

1419
01:17:35.079 --> 01:17:38.479
<v Speaker 8>are not up for debate under the normative authority of.

1420
01:17:39.319 --> 01:17:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's a different issue, so.

1421
01:17:43.840 --> 01:17:50.000
<v Speaker 11>Of course the Constitution's open to uh interpretation with a

1422
01:17:50.039 --> 01:17:56.760
<v Speaker 11>separate issue. The difference is my interpretation isn't law. So

1423
01:17:56.880 --> 01:17:58.600
<v Speaker 11>I might get it right, I might get it wrong.

1424
01:18:00.079 --> 01:18:01.880
<v Speaker 11>The judge might get a right or wrong. But the

1425
01:18:01.920 --> 01:18:08.039
<v Speaker 11>difference is it's binding on me. Now there's an appeals. Well,

1426
01:18:08.079 --> 01:18:13.159
<v Speaker 11>what happens when the judge does bad law? It's still law.

1427
01:18:13.239 --> 01:18:15.840
<v Speaker 11>You can't just say, well, that's not what the the

1428
01:18:15.920 --> 01:18:18.920
<v Speaker 11>law says that I don't have to obey it. You're

1429
01:18:19.000 --> 01:18:22.279
<v Speaker 11>under the law of that judge. There's an appeals and

1430
01:18:22.359 --> 01:18:26.800
<v Speaker 11>it goes higher up. So likewise in the church, of course,

1431
01:18:26.840 --> 01:18:30.199
<v Speaker 11>in some like we're all in the same epistemic situation,

1432
01:18:32.119 --> 01:18:36.079
<v Speaker 11>and you could make yourself more privileged or underprivileged depending

1433
01:18:36.119 --> 01:18:40.760
<v Speaker 11>on certain concepts and lack of evidence or looking at stuff.

1434
01:18:41.000 --> 01:18:44.000
<v Speaker 11>I mean, you get the idea that one could be

1435
01:18:44.039 --> 01:18:49.840
<v Speaker 11>in a better position to make a correct interpretation or worse.

1436
01:18:50.760 --> 01:18:53.960
<v Speaker 2>But the issue is, yeah, is there anybody that can

1437
01:18:54.039 --> 01:18:55.159
<v Speaker 2>lay this out as law?

1438
01:18:56.640 --> 01:19:00.239
<v Speaker 11>That's what normative authority needs. So if a bishop get

1439
01:19:00.279 --> 01:19:03.840
<v Speaker 11>something wrong and they have let's even think the priest

1440
01:19:03.960 --> 01:19:08.119
<v Speaker 11>in some sense is has a normative legal authority over you.

1441
01:19:08.840 --> 01:19:10.640
<v Speaker 2>They can get it right do you where do you

1442
01:19:10.680 --> 01:19:12.319
<v Speaker 2>go to settle this?

1443
01:19:12.399 --> 01:19:14.600
<v Speaker 11>So there's a different issue like what's how do I

1444
01:19:14.680 --> 01:19:17.960
<v Speaker 11>know the right answer? Versus how is it legally or

1445
01:19:18.039 --> 01:19:22.000
<v Speaker 11>coleasily settled? And you go up a court of appeals,

1446
01:19:22.439 --> 01:19:23.680
<v Speaker 11>like you go to the bishop.

1447
01:19:24.359 --> 01:19:25.920
<v Speaker 2>What happens when the bishop.

1448
01:19:26.359 --> 01:19:29.239
<v Speaker 3>Is getting the way he would be subject to the right.

1449
01:19:29.399 --> 01:19:32.600
<v Speaker 11>He's subject to the synop So that's a local senate.

1450
01:19:33.000 --> 01:19:37.720
<v Speaker 11>What happens if you know the synops it eventually would

1451
01:19:37.720 --> 01:19:43.319
<v Speaker 11>go to the A largers right eventually all the way

1452
01:19:43.359 --> 01:19:47.760
<v Speaker 11>up to Boy Commendment right all of all the entire church,

1453
01:19:48.760 --> 01:19:54.079
<v Speaker 11>in which case, there we see through scripture the Holy

1454
01:19:54.159 --> 01:19:55.479
<v Speaker 11>Spirit is present.

1455
01:19:55.159 --> 01:19:56.479
<v Speaker 2>And works, and.

1456
01:19:59.000 --> 01:20:01.560
<v Speaker 11>We would say it that level there's an infallibility. But

1457
01:20:02.079 --> 01:20:04.600
<v Speaker 11>there's a separate issue going on, like how do we

1458
01:20:04.680 --> 01:20:05.640
<v Speaker 11>resolve disputes?

1459
01:20:05.680 --> 01:20:07.199
<v Speaker 2>How does the legal.

1460
01:20:06.880 --> 01:20:11.640
<v Speaker 11>Structure work within the church. Well, it's a court of appeals.

1461
01:20:11.680 --> 01:20:13.640
<v Speaker 11>It goes up, but it doesn't mean that it's not

1462
01:20:14.800 --> 01:20:19.239
<v Speaker 11>it's not law. It's just we have different levels of normal,

1463
01:20:19.439 --> 01:20:23.039
<v Speaker 11>Like some things are more binding right you can keep

1464
01:20:23.079 --> 01:20:26.399
<v Speaker 11>going up, and things at lower levels can be challenged

1465
01:20:27.880 --> 01:20:32.960
<v Speaker 11>and ecumenical council cannot because it's the entire Church and

1466
01:20:33.000 --> 01:20:34.760
<v Speaker 11>that is the Holy Theirs Christ.

1467
01:20:34.960 --> 01:20:38.399
<v Speaker 3>Or nowadays it would be some type of pan Orthodox synod,

1468
01:20:39.560 --> 01:20:43.039
<v Speaker 3>but that cannot easily be done given the geopolitical situation

1469
01:20:43.159 --> 01:20:45.520
<v Speaker 3>of the time. And there's been situations in the history

1470
01:20:45.560 --> 01:20:50.079
<v Speaker 3>of the Church where geopolitical situations prevented ecumenical councils as well,

1471
01:20:50.119 --> 01:20:54.199
<v Speaker 3>so that's not unprecedented. But theoretically there could definitely be

1472
01:20:54.319 --> 01:20:57.399
<v Speaker 3>a pan Orthodox Synoon, or there could be some You

1473
01:20:57.399 --> 01:21:00.159
<v Speaker 3>could even have a synod that does something or states something,

1474
01:21:00.199 --> 01:21:02.680
<v Speaker 3>and then if the rest of the Orthodox world eventually

1475
01:21:02.760 --> 01:21:04.239
<v Speaker 3>accepts it, it could be normal.

1476
01:21:05.079 --> 01:21:07.199
<v Speaker 2>Because I want to make it clear that it's not

1477
01:21:07.399 --> 01:21:11.800
<v Speaker 2>just simply a mechanical or robotic life. W If I

1478
01:21:11.920 --> 01:21:15.359
<v Speaker 2>just do these things and say these words or put.

1479
01:21:15.199 --> 01:21:17.840
<v Speaker 11>These people together, then it makes the magic happen.

1480
01:21:18.000 --> 01:21:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Right, then that's the Holy Spirit, it's Jay's wright.

1481
01:21:23.720 --> 01:21:30.159
<v Speaker 11>Obviously, it cannot be an ecumenical council if it's not

1482
01:21:30.239 --> 01:21:33.439
<v Speaker 11>in line with theology of the Church.

1483
01:21:34.520 --> 01:21:36.479
<v Speaker 2>If it's not received by the church, if.

1484
01:21:36.319 --> 01:21:39.800
<v Speaker 11>The capital Holos is not working as cata Holos, it

1485
01:21:39.840 --> 01:21:41.119
<v Speaker 11>can't be capta holos.

1486
01:21:41.399 --> 01:21:47.039
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, like the Palamite Synods were Byzantine councils, which the

1487
01:21:47.159 --> 01:21:51.560
<v Speaker 3>entire Orthodox world basically I'm as far as unaware of firms.

1488
01:21:51.880 --> 01:21:55.079
<v Speaker 3>So for all intents and purposes, we can call those

1489
01:21:55.439 --> 01:21:58.960
<v Speaker 3>ecumenical councils the eighth and the Ninth, even though they

1490
01:21:59.000 --> 01:22:02.560
<v Speaker 3>may not technically be Waitumena based councils in terms of

1491
01:22:02.600 --> 01:22:05.359
<v Speaker 3>the whole imperium. The rest of the world over the

1492
01:22:05.399 --> 01:22:10.720
<v Speaker 3>centuries has adopted those for all intentsive purposes, they're infallible

1493
01:22:10.760 --> 01:22:12.520
<v Speaker 3>pan Orthodox councils.

1494
01:22:16.239 --> 01:22:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thanks, appreciate your time.

1495
01:22:17.880 --> 01:22:21.279
<v Speaker 8>Last question, I wrote a small book on symbolism and film.

1496
01:22:21.279 --> 01:22:23.560
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to send you a copy if you'd like.

1497
01:22:23.600 --> 01:22:24.720
<v Speaker 2>What's the best way to send you.

1498
01:22:24.680 --> 01:22:28.920
<v Speaker 3>Something like that? You could send me a DM and

1499
01:22:28.960 --> 01:22:30.680
<v Speaker 3>I'll give you a po box if you want to

1500
01:22:30.720 --> 01:22:32.720
<v Speaker 3>send me a book. Appreciate that.

1501
01:22:33.199 --> 01:22:33.479
<v Speaker 2>Thanks.

1502
01:22:33.760 --> 01:22:35.760
<v Speaker 3>I want to remind you guys too, that coming up

1503
01:22:35.800 --> 01:22:40.079
<v Speaker 3>in uh let's see six days, we're under a week

1504
01:22:41.079 --> 01:22:46.439
<v Speaker 3>big awesome live event January nineteenth here in Florida, Tampa.

1505
01:22:47.000 --> 01:22:49.760
<v Speaker 3>It'll be our first movie convention. We're going to this

1506
01:22:49.800 --> 01:22:53.800
<v Speaker 3>horror convention. I'm invited to speak on the dark Secrets

1507
01:22:53.800 --> 01:22:55.840
<v Speaker 3>of Horror Movies. So I will be given us a

1508
01:22:55.960 --> 01:22:58.800
<v Speaker 3>Terry Hollywood presentation the first thirty ticket holders. It may

1509
01:22:58.840 --> 01:23:02.039
<v Speaker 3>be sold out. If it's not, I'm not sure exactly

1510
01:23:02.039 --> 01:23:04.720
<v Speaker 3>where we are on tickets. First thirty get a free

1511
01:23:04.720 --> 01:23:07.960
<v Speaker 3>copy of Vessel Tay Hollywood Signed. If you don't get that,

1512
01:23:08.000 --> 01:23:10.960
<v Speaker 3>you can always get another copy. We will be at

1513
01:23:11.000 --> 01:23:14.520
<v Speaker 3>the convention, which is all day long. That's a separate

1514
01:23:14.560 --> 01:23:18.399
<v Speaker 3>event from this dinner packaged event. So if you want

1515
01:23:18.479 --> 01:23:21.640
<v Speaker 3>tickets to my lecture and my talk that night, and

1516
01:23:21.720 --> 01:23:23.640
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a panel discussion, there's a bunch of

1517
01:23:23.640 --> 01:23:26.760
<v Speaker 3>fun stuff going on. BG Comby. I have rumor that

1518
01:23:26.760 --> 01:23:30.319
<v Speaker 3>BG Comby will be there, so you can also come

1519
01:23:30.359 --> 01:23:34.199
<v Speaker 3>meet some of the other cool dudes. BG is a

1520
01:23:34.279 --> 01:23:42.439
<v Speaker 3>very cool dude. So there's the tickets, all right, I'm

1521
01:23:42.479 --> 01:23:45.520
<v Speaker 3>about spent, dude. We've been We went for six hours. Man,

1522
01:23:45.600 --> 01:23:48.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if I can. I gotta go eat man. Father,

1523
01:23:48.840 --> 01:23:50.560
<v Speaker 3>you can thank you so much. I'll give some of

1524
01:23:50.560 --> 01:23:52.640
<v Speaker 3>the super chip I'll give you some of the super chats.

1525
01:23:52.680 --> 01:23:55.199
<v Speaker 3>And thank you to Rachel and Andrew for sending so

1526
01:23:55.199 --> 01:23:58.039
<v Speaker 3>many people today, and thank you to Rachel for that

1527
01:23:58.600 --> 01:24:01.600
<v Speaker 3>big that super chat and Elias five. Wait we read

1528
01:24:01.640 --> 01:24:05.319
<v Speaker 3>that Potus three dollars. Does the Moscow patriarch have less

1529
01:24:05.359 --> 01:24:09.800
<v Speaker 3>problems than other churches? I don't even know how to

1530
01:24:10.359 --> 01:24:15.479
<v Speaker 3>count up. Every jurisdiction has unique problems and issues, so

1531
01:24:15.680 --> 01:24:19.439
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. Would you put problems in MP on

1532
01:24:19.520 --> 01:24:23.119
<v Speaker 3>par with ro Corps. I've never been to an MP church.

1533
01:24:23.199 --> 01:24:25.079
<v Speaker 3>I don't follow. I don't know that much about what's

1534
01:24:25.079 --> 01:24:27.079
<v Speaker 3>going on in the MP. I'm in a row Court church,

1535
01:24:27.159 --> 01:24:31.199
<v Speaker 3>so I know about more localized Uh. You know, we

1536
01:24:31.279 --> 01:24:34.279
<v Speaker 3>had an issue of a person in ro Corps in

1537
01:24:34.319 --> 01:24:37.399
<v Speaker 3>Miami going to the EP. I mean that was a

1538
01:24:37.439 --> 01:24:42.479
<v Speaker 3>huge scandal. I don't know, man' I don't follow a

1539
01:24:42.479 --> 01:24:45.680
<v Speaker 3>lot of church drama, so I have no idea North

1540
01:24:45.680 --> 01:24:53.199
<v Speaker 3>Country Nard one dollar. The Oriental has a channel. It's

1541
01:24:53.199 --> 01:24:56.359
<v Speaker 3>nothing but misinformation. Yeah, I'm familiar with those guys. Ronnie

1542
01:24:56.359 --> 01:24:59.239
<v Speaker 3>Howard five dollars. I love your content. I got an

1543
01:24:59.239 --> 01:25:02.319
<v Speaker 3>OCA church, my family in Mexico or Joe's witnesses. Oh

1544
01:25:03.560 --> 01:25:07.800
<v Speaker 3>how am I supposed to reconcile the religious differences with

1545
01:25:07.960 --> 01:25:12.239
<v Speaker 3>the threat of being excommunicated by them? Well, Jesus says,

1546
01:25:12.239 --> 01:25:15.159
<v Speaker 3>you know, he that loves family, mother or father more

1547
01:25:15.199 --> 01:25:16.920
<v Speaker 3>than me is not worthy. So I think at a

1548
01:25:16.920 --> 01:25:19.279
<v Speaker 3>certain point, you know, you might be called to that.

1549
01:25:19.359 --> 01:25:23.159
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying that you're necessarily going to get what

1550
01:25:23.199 --> 01:25:25.479
<v Speaker 3>do they call it, shunned by them? I don't know,

1551
01:25:26.119 --> 01:25:27.479
<v Speaker 3>but I mean, I just.

1552
01:25:27.439 --> 01:25:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Get dirt on my family. I'm like, you go that way.

1553
01:25:29.880 --> 01:25:31.840
<v Speaker 3>Get some dirt and blackmail and brot. And I'm just joking.

1554
01:25:33.640 --> 01:25:35.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, if they're if they shun you,

1555
01:25:35.720 --> 01:25:38.960
<v Speaker 3>then you can't control that. You know, if they shun

1556
01:25:39.000 --> 01:25:42.000
<v Speaker 3>you for believing the deed of Christ, I mean, then

1557
01:25:42.720 --> 01:25:48.239
<v Speaker 3>you know, count that as a blessing. Jesus says. But

1558
01:25:48.319 --> 01:25:50.079
<v Speaker 3>I don't think we have to work to try to

1559
01:25:50.079 --> 01:25:52.560
<v Speaker 3>get people to be mad at us. I think you know,

1560
01:25:52.560 --> 01:25:54.680
<v Speaker 3>if you just affirm the deed of Christ, they're going

1561
01:25:54.720 --> 01:25:56.399
<v Speaker 3>to be mad at you no matter what. Nick Bond

1562
01:25:56.479 --> 01:26:00.840
<v Speaker 3>five dollars, How do I locate the link about Anglicanism?

1563
01:26:02.000 --> 01:26:06.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's the video on my channel about Anglinism.

1564
01:26:06.079 --> 01:26:13.520
<v Speaker 3>I put it in the chat MKG five dollars. Did

1565
01:26:13.520 --> 01:26:15.960
<v Speaker 3>you do? Have you done any full videos of krawl young?

1566
01:26:17.960 --> 01:26:18.520
<v Speaker 13>Uh?

1567
01:26:20.479 --> 01:26:23.039
<v Speaker 3>I've not done full videos. There was a crazy dude

1568
01:26:23.119 --> 01:26:26.199
<v Speaker 3>who lost his marbles. And like went ape on me

1569
01:26:26.359 --> 01:26:30.239
<v Speaker 3>for he was a Jungian dude. It's funny because I

1570
01:26:30.239 --> 01:26:32.760
<v Speaker 3>bring up aon, which is what you're talking about, because

1571
01:26:32.800 --> 01:26:38.520
<v Speaker 3>in aon, Carl Jung says that Jesus is anti Christ

1572
01:26:38.600 --> 01:26:41.319
<v Speaker 3>and they're the same their flip sides of the same coin.

1573
01:26:42.079 --> 01:26:45.720
<v Speaker 3>So this Jungian gnostic dude has a meltdown when we

1574
01:26:45.760 --> 01:26:49.720
<v Speaker 3>start debating this, and he's like, you've never even read Young,

1575
01:26:50.079 --> 01:26:53.960
<v Speaker 3>and I'm like, I'm quoting you from aon. His it's

1576
01:26:54.000 --> 01:26:59.359
<v Speaker 3>a aio n and I think it's an actual book,

1577
01:27:00.560 --> 01:27:04.119
<v Speaker 3>and this dude just has a complete meltdown. But now, actually,

1578
01:27:04.239 --> 01:27:06.960
<v Speaker 3>the other day, because I'm writing Esoter Hollywood three, I

1579
01:27:07.000 --> 01:27:11.439
<v Speaker 3>needed to I'm rewriting the Donnie Darko chapter and the

1580
01:27:12.119 --> 01:27:15.159
<v Speaker 3>Box chapter the Richard Kelly movies, and I needed to

1581
01:27:15.199 --> 01:27:17.239
<v Speaker 3>reference a bunch of Carl Young. So I actually went

1582
01:27:17.279 --> 01:27:19.600
<v Speaker 3>and read a bunch of Carl Young that I hadn't read.

1583
01:27:20.239 --> 01:27:23.359
<v Speaker 3>So I have read Carl Young in the past, but

1584
01:27:23.439 --> 01:27:26.479
<v Speaker 3>now I've read even more Carl Young. And in the

1585
01:27:26.600 --> 01:27:29.840
<v Speaker 3>chapter on Anima, he says, I'm just talking about a

1586
01:27:29.840 --> 01:27:33.359
<v Speaker 3>bunch of ancient gnostic stuff. So yeah, of course, of

1587
01:27:33.399 --> 01:27:36.239
<v Speaker 3>course it's gnostic stuff, and of course he gives evil

1588
01:27:36.279 --> 01:27:41.800
<v Speaker 3>substance absolutely damas five dollars? What are the church father

1589
01:27:44.199 --> 01:27:46.399
<v Speaker 3>Why is it the church fathers never really execute the

1590
01:27:46.439 --> 01:27:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Book of Revelation that every preacher feels like they have

1591
01:27:48.640 --> 01:27:55.199
<v Speaker 3>it down to a science pride and delusion, curie las

1592
01:27:55.239 --> 01:28:00.680
<v Speaker 3>one dollar. Pres Positionalism is guilty of a lodge goal Howler.

1593
01:28:01.720 --> 01:28:06.479
<v Speaker 3>It commits the petitio principii or begging the question policy,

1594
01:28:06.560 --> 01:28:09.199
<v Speaker 3>because Avoca is presupposing the Christian theism to prove the

1595
01:28:09.279 --> 01:28:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Christian theism. Do you have any thoughts on this? Yeah,

1596
01:28:13.760 --> 01:28:16.439
<v Speaker 3>We've heard this many times. So the point is that

1597
01:28:17.520 --> 01:28:20.199
<v Speaker 3>it's not saying that Christian's true Christianity is true because

1598
01:28:20.239 --> 01:28:25.840
<v Speaker 3>I presuppose it. It's saying that every position presupposes. And

1599
01:28:25.920 --> 01:28:28.000
<v Speaker 3>so the way that we would prove or disprove an

1600
01:28:28.119 --> 01:28:32.039
<v Speaker 3>argument is by comparing paradigms as a whole to see

1601
01:28:32.039 --> 01:28:35.800
<v Speaker 3>which ones are coherent, which ones have explanatory power, et cetera.

1602
01:28:36.319 --> 01:28:39.239
<v Speaker 3>So it's not doing what these people think it's doing.

1603
01:28:41.199 --> 01:28:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Last guy, Christian, It does sound like a trend horn quote,

1604
01:28:56.520 --> 01:29:04.199
<v Speaker 3>doesn't it. What's up man? Your own hi?

1605
01:29:04.439 --> 01:29:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Jay?

1606
01:29:05.680 --> 01:29:10.239
<v Speaker 18>I was trying to make the argument for compatibilism in

1607
01:29:10.359 --> 01:29:17.319
<v Speaker 18>terms of when it comes to communism and predestination or knowledge.

1608
01:29:18.680 --> 01:29:22.159
<v Speaker 2>I guess my argument for that would be that.

1609
01:29:23.640 --> 01:29:26.399
<v Speaker 18>As a Christian, I realized that I don't have the

1610
01:29:26.560 --> 01:29:30.039
<v Speaker 18>knowledge God has in determining who's are his and who's

1611
01:29:30.039 --> 01:29:31.640
<v Speaker 18>are not, But.

1612
01:29:31.600 --> 01:29:34.479
<v Speaker 2>Based on the doctrine, I do trust.

1613
01:29:35.359 --> 01:29:41.479
<v Speaker 14>The the faith I have in knowing that whoever I

1614
01:29:41.560 --> 01:29:45.600
<v Speaker 14>want to, you know, work.

1615
01:29:45.439 --> 01:29:47.520
<v Speaker 2>With as far as like a brother in Christ.

1616
01:29:48.199 --> 01:29:55.000
<v Speaker 18>I feel like compatibilism, which would argue against Armenianism, would

1617
01:29:55.039 --> 01:29:59.960
<v Speaker 18>be a better argument because I feel like with our minionism,

1618
01:30:00.920 --> 01:30:03.159
<v Speaker 18>you have this ah.

1619
01:30:04.880 --> 01:30:05.000
<v Speaker 2>You.

1620
01:30:05.079 --> 01:30:08.640
<v Speaker 18>It's based on what your instincts think tell you who

1621
01:30:08.680 --> 01:30:12.239
<v Speaker 18>you can or can't trust, and so that's that's why

1622
01:30:12.279 --> 01:30:12.840
<v Speaker 18>I feel.

1623
01:30:12.600 --> 01:30:15.039
<v Speaker 3>Like, I mean, I don't know what. None of this

1624
01:30:15.079 --> 01:30:17.840
<v Speaker 3>has anything to with proving or distriving Calvinism because Calvinism

1625
01:30:17.920 --> 01:30:24.079
<v Speaker 3>is disproven by Christology. Calvinism relies on a soteriology doctrine

1626
01:30:24.119 --> 01:30:28.720
<v Speaker 3>that's ahead of Christology. Christology is an afterthought and it

1627
01:30:28.960 --> 01:30:31.920
<v Speaker 3>ends up saying that Christ has to be damned for

1628
01:30:32.000 --> 01:30:34.520
<v Speaker 3>you to be saved. Do you believe that? No?

1629
01:30:34.600 --> 01:30:39.840
<v Speaker 20>I In terms of Calvinism, it's it's more of this

1630
01:30:40.000 --> 01:30:44.199
<v Speaker 20>has to do with eternal, eternal elections, so it's obviously

1631
01:30:44.319 --> 01:30:44.960
<v Speaker 20>is salvation.

1632
01:30:45.159 --> 01:30:47.000
<v Speaker 2>It's metaphysical.

1633
01:30:47.239 --> 01:30:51.199
<v Speaker 18>Uh, it's more of a you determining whether or not

1634
01:30:51.800 --> 01:30:54.920
<v Speaker 18>you're part of God's elect and in terms of like

1635
01:30:54.960 --> 01:30:57.079
<v Speaker 18>our interactions with each other on earth.

1636
01:30:58.039 --> 01:31:01.119
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's it's difficult to are.

1637
01:31:00.960 --> 01:31:02.840
<v Speaker 3>You arguing for Calvinism, I don't understand.

1638
01:31:03.279 --> 01:31:07.640
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, I'm arguing for Calvinism in the sense that you know,

1639
01:31:07.840 --> 01:31:12.039
<v Speaker 18>in my in my experience, you know, I've gone through,

1640
01:31:13.079 --> 01:31:15.399
<v Speaker 18>you know, especially during the pandemic, I had a lot

1641
01:31:15.439 --> 01:31:18.760
<v Speaker 18>of you know, betrayal and just.

1642
01:31:19.319 --> 01:31:20.760
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people that abandoned me.

1643
01:31:20.960 --> 01:31:25.800
<v Speaker 18>But you know, grasping on my faith in Christ, I

1644
01:31:25.920 --> 01:31:31.520
<v Speaker 18>realized that those things were predetermined and that moving forward,

1645
01:31:31.840 --> 01:31:32.560
<v Speaker 18>in order to.

1646
01:31:34.159 --> 01:31:36.800
<v Speaker 2>In order to display works that go.

1647
01:31:36.760 --> 01:31:40.560
<v Speaker 18>Along with faith, I have to trust my Christian brothers.

1648
01:31:41.239 --> 01:31:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, but that sounds more like a personal issue, and

1649
01:31:44.039 --> 01:31:47.640
<v Speaker 3>I would just say, go check out my theological critiques

1650
01:31:47.640 --> 01:31:49.920
<v Speaker 3>of Calvinism. So I'm sorry that you have betrayal, but

1651
01:31:50.399 --> 01:31:53.039
<v Speaker 3>I don't see how personal betrayal and then accepting that

1652
01:31:53.119 --> 01:31:56.279
<v Speaker 3>God was the direct cause of all those events somehow

1653
01:31:56.800 --> 01:32:00.600
<v Speaker 3>pers Calvinism. It seems like a very subjective to take,

1654
01:32:01.119 --> 01:32:03.960
<v Speaker 3>but I'm arguing that Calvinism has many, many mistakes that

1655
01:32:04.000 --> 01:32:08.319
<v Speaker 3>are more severe than whether there's free will versus predestination.

1656
01:32:08.399 --> 01:32:12.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm talking about like trinitarian errors. I'm talking about calvin

1657
01:32:12.560 --> 01:32:15.439
<v Speaker 3>teaching that Christ was damned in our place. Okay, that's

1658
01:32:15.479 --> 01:32:21.640
<v Speaker 3>anti trinitarian. That's way more serious than you know, the

1659
01:32:21.680 --> 01:32:24.199
<v Speaker 3>other things. And I'm not trying to be mean to you.

1660
01:32:24.239 --> 01:32:26.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry that you had those bad experiences, but hey,

1661
01:32:26.319 --> 01:32:30.279
<v Speaker 3>look everybody has bad experiences, so but we can't let

1662
01:32:30.319 --> 01:32:35.239
<v Speaker 3>that determine our theological stances m KG five dollars. I

1663
01:32:35.239 --> 01:32:37.920
<v Speaker 3>saw the clip. This is what actually sparked my interest.

1664
01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:42.039
<v Speaker 3>What clip? Oh the Carl Young guy? Would you consider

1665
01:32:42.079 --> 01:32:44.000
<v Speaker 3>a full deep dive on the subject of kral Young

1666
01:32:44.079 --> 01:32:46.079
<v Speaker 3>on Christ? Well, i'd have to read more. I don't.

1667
01:32:46.119 --> 01:32:47.479
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I don't know when I'm gonna have ton

1668
01:32:47.600 --> 01:32:51.119
<v Speaker 3>to read, tons and tons of crawl young maybe, But

1669
01:32:51.760 --> 01:32:54.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's like if he thinks Jesus and Antichrist

1670
01:32:54.720 --> 01:32:57.640
<v Speaker 3>are the same principle, flip sides of the same coin,

1671
01:32:57.800 --> 01:33:00.840
<v Speaker 3>Like I don't, I don't even I mean, like, how

1672
01:33:00.880 --> 01:33:04.079
<v Speaker 3>much refutation do we need, like how much reading of

1673
01:33:04.119 --> 01:33:07.159
<v Speaker 3>Carl Young do I have to read to know that's nonsense?

1674
01:33:08.039 --> 01:33:10.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, like, so in this chapter on Animal, for example,

1675
01:33:10.680 --> 01:33:15.840
<v Speaker 3>he says, kid you not. He says, oh, the early

1676
01:33:15.920 --> 01:33:20.520
<v Speaker 3>Church banished the mother principle from the Trinity, and it's

1677
01:33:20.600 --> 01:33:25.119
<v Speaker 3>time to recover that. In my psychoanalysis, the mother principle

1678
01:33:25.159 --> 01:33:27.319
<v Speaker 3>that when was there ever a mother in the trinity.

1679
01:33:27.600 --> 01:33:31.000
<v Speaker 3>It's literally Bogokov sociology stuff, like what are you talking

1680
01:33:31.039 --> 01:33:35.359
<v Speaker 3>about the mother in the Trinity? Then he says, I

1681
01:33:35.399 --> 01:33:38.680
<v Speaker 3>kid you not. He said in the Animal chapter, he says, uh,

1682
01:33:38.920 --> 01:33:43.279
<v Speaker 3>let's take some medieval monks that had visions of God

1683
01:33:43.279 --> 01:33:48.359
<v Speaker 3>as a woman. Why are we why should I follow

1684
01:33:48.439 --> 01:33:55.079
<v Speaker 3>medieval crazy Roman Catholic creeps talking about God as a woman? Literally,

1685
01:33:55.119 --> 01:34:00.359
<v Speaker 3>That's what he argues. So, like, does it didn't that

1686
01:34:00.479 --> 01:34:02.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of from the outset raise some red flags like

1687
01:34:03.000 --> 01:34:05.920
<v Speaker 3>maybe I'm not maybe this is not like this most

1688
01:34:05.960 --> 01:34:08.239
<v Speaker 3>profound stuff now I know. Jordan Peterson says, oh, he's

1689
01:34:08.239 --> 01:34:10.960
<v Speaker 3>like the most profound thinker of the twentieth century, or

1690
01:34:10.960 --> 01:34:16.880
<v Speaker 3>at least Peterson said that a long time ago, and

1691
01:34:16.880 --> 01:34:21.239
<v Speaker 3>in those personality lectures. But I mean, I'm not saying

1692
01:34:21.279 --> 01:34:23.560
<v Speaker 3>that there's not interesting things in Crawl Young, because there are.

1693
01:34:24.239 --> 01:34:26.239
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think there are archetypes, and there's some

1694
01:34:26.279 --> 01:34:29.119
<v Speaker 3>neat stuff going on, but it's not all this wacko crazy,

1695
01:34:29.640 --> 01:34:32.479
<v Speaker 3>Like this is crazy stuff, and you don't have to

1696
01:34:32.479 --> 01:34:34.520
<v Speaker 3>go very far in Crawl Young before he literally just

1697
01:34:34.520 --> 01:34:37.479
<v Speaker 3>says a bunch of crazy stuff. And by the way,

1698
01:34:37.520 --> 01:34:42.479
<v Speaker 3>Carl Young is an OSS spy informant, Like, how about

1699
01:34:42.479 --> 01:34:47.199
<v Speaker 3>that calling into question his credibility. Oh you didn't know that, Yeah, absolutely,

1700
01:34:47.239 --> 01:34:51.880
<v Speaker 3>his agent four eight eight. Look it up. It's in

1701
01:34:51.960 --> 01:34:53.720
<v Speaker 3>by the way, I have that necessarily with three. By

1702
01:34:53.760 --> 01:34:56.119
<v Speaker 3>the way, but maybe down the road if I read

1703
01:34:56.199 --> 01:34:59.600
<v Speaker 3>more Carl Young. I did get the the text, by

1704
01:34:59.600 --> 01:35:03.960
<v Speaker 3>the way, it's he has a bunch of works, but

1705
01:35:04.880 --> 01:35:10.119
<v Speaker 3>I have the volume that is his archetypes of the

1706
01:35:10.119 --> 01:35:13.560
<v Speaker 3>Collective Unconscious. And so there's a chapter on the Anima,

1707
01:35:13.720 --> 01:35:17.880
<v Speaker 3>chapter on Trickster, there's a chapter on the mother, there's

1708
01:35:17.920 --> 01:35:21.960
<v Speaker 3>a chapter on the father archetype, I think the son.

1709
01:35:24.239 --> 01:35:27.359
<v Speaker 3>It's like all it's all the essential Carl Young stuff

1710
01:35:27.439 --> 01:35:30.239
<v Speaker 3>is in that book. So maybe that will prove to

1711
01:35:30.319 --> 01:35:33.680
<v Speaker 3>be something. Actually, we probably probably should just read that

1712
01:35:33.720 --> 01:35:37.159
<v Speaker 3>whole book and do a talk on it all right,

1713
01:35:37.199 --> 01:35:39.399
<v Speaker 3>thank you guys. My mind is mush. I'm starting to

1714
01:35:39.399 --> 01:35:41.199
<v Speaker 3>get a headache. So this is just way too much

1715
01:35:42.039 --> 01:35:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Live Strength tonight. But hey, it was a lot of fun.

1716
01:35:43.800 --> 01:35:50.079
<v Speaker 3>We had some wild, feral individuals. It was pretty crazy. Guys,

1717
01:35:50.199 --> 01:35:53.640
<v Speaker 3>chill out and the chat. Please don't spam, but everybody,

1718
01:35:53.680 --> 01:35:55.920
<v Speaker 3>have a good night. Get your tickets, get your
