Speaker 1: You see some things are going to happen.
Speaker 2: What's going to happen? You?
Speaker 3: Welcome to the Occult Rejects this episode.
Speaker 4: I got a bunch of us with us tonight, and
Speaker 4: we've got a very special guest, somebody that I met
Speaker 4: personally at the Cosmic Summit, so I'm very excited to
Speaker 4: get him on the show. But before we introduce the
Speaker 4: guests we will cover, we'll have the other rejects introduce themselves.
Speaker 3: We're gonna start with Brooke. What is going on? Brook?
Speaker 3: How will you?
Speaker 5: I'm doing well? Thank you for having me tonight.
Speaker 2: I'm happy to be here.
Speaker 1: You can find me on Instagram, at darkforda podcast, and
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 5: I'm excited for tonight's topic.
Speaker 4: Thank you, Thank you, and I very much appreciate you
Speaker 4: making with us. And then we got Tyrone from the
Speaker 4: Birth of the World. What is going on on it?
Speaker 5: What's going on? Everybody?
Speaker 6: Everything you can find about me is on rebirth at
Speaker 6: the word dot com and that's my website. Can buy
Speaker 6: my book there was best seller. It also can be
Speaker 6: bought on Amazon. Journey through the Origins of History. Thank you,
Speaker 6: Hell yeah, go check out that book. It's up on Amazon,
Speaker 6: and then we got the Podfather himself. We got Ricardo.
Speaker 6: What is going on, my man?
Speaker 5: How are you that name has already reached here?
Speaker 3: Okay, yeah, yeah, no, I saw that shit on Twitter.
Speaker 3: I was like, oh, this is that funny. I love it.
Speaker 3: The potfolow.
Speaker 5: So good evening, everyone, Thank you very much for calling
Speaker 5: me into this conversation. I'm quite eager to learn from this.
Speaker 5: Salt Water electros As for me, you can find me
Speaker 5: at the as the name but there is on the
Speaker 5: screen on X and I would invite everyone to go
Speaker 5: and look to Institute Finatophilosophy dot org. But you can
Speaker 5: find our magazine. You can find possibilities to collaborate with
Speaker 5: us and bring suggestions. So oh, by the way, you
Speaker 5: can also look at my books Stardust and The Residents
Speaker 5: that you can find on Amazon. Thank you, Nick.
Speaker 3: Yeah, of course, of course.
Speaker 4: Also, I mean, if you don't mind, I mean, but
Speaker 4: I think people show us well, go check out Universal Veil.
Speaker 3: I mean that you're kind of associated with that, so.
Speaker 5: Absolutely, yeah, I mean I want to plug that for
Speaker 5: you again right now. So, but I came in to
Speaker 5: hear they were premiering try it own, right now at
Speaker 5: this moment.
Speaker 3: So yes, yes, but definitely go check out that show.
Speaker 3: Definitely worth check it out.
Speaker 5: Absolutely.
Speaker 3: Yeah, No, they are really cool. They had me on.
Speaker 3: They are really awesome women and they're very intelligent. Uh
Speaker 3: so uh.
Speaker 4: And then last but not least, before we get to
Speaker 4: the guests, we got Bennett. What is going on, sir?
Speaker 3: How are you? Hey?
Speaker 7: Thanks for having me on. Ben and Tanton from Broadcasting
Speaker 7: Seeds podcast You can find me wherever podcasts are played
Speaker 7: and also broadcasting seeds dot com. Also another thing that
Speaker 7: I've been pushing as a magazine that I'm affiliated with
Speaker 7: and an editor for, called Strange Knocks Magazine and you
Speaker 7: can find that through links through at my website or
Speaker 7: at You're Gonna Love It Gotten Knockers dot com.
Speaker 3: I do like it.
Speaker 7: Yeah, appreciate you having me on.
Speaker 4: Of course, of course, I'm sure I think he's got
Speaker 4: like ten ASMR channels out there he just won't tell
Speaker 4: us about yet.
Speaker 7: But yeah, yeah, it's it's good on there.
Speaker 4: Okay, thank you so much for joining us, my mad
Speaker 4: I really appreciate it. And finally to the guest himself,
Speaker 4: like I said, I met this man at the Cosmwick
Speaker 4: Summit I be totally honest with you. I think I
Speaker 4: I met you. I think looking that ship up to
Speaker 4: that Friday, fucking walking up that thing and going to
Speaker 4: film shit, I think I met you. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 4: I think I met you then and we started talking
Speaker 4: and we hit it off, and I was like, oh,
Speaker 4: this guy's got something to talk about. And I got
Speaker 4: your information, but please, ah, let everybody know what you
Speaker 4: deal is. And uh, you know, I guess wherever they
Speaker 4: can find anything you're talking about if you're on social
Speaker 4: media whatever.
Speaker 8: Yeah, I'm I've been doing work on megalithic structures by
Speaker 8: myself for a very long time, just kind of as
Speaker 8: a hobby. I actually was I'm going on a tour
Speaker 8: with Pravine to Thailand, and I talked to him about
Speaker 8: a little bit about what I was working on and
Speaker 8: why I was wanted to go to Thailand and all this,
Speaker 8: and uh, right before the Cosmic Summit, like a week before,
Speaker 8: and after talking to him, he told me, hey, maybe
Speaker 8: you should talk about this at this place called the
Speaker 8: Cosmic Summit that he was going to. And I had
Speaker 8: no idea about it, and since he told me to go,
Speaker 8: literally booked my tickets the next day. Flew out of
Speaker 8: North Carolina. I'm from Phoenix, Arizona, and UH ended up
Speaker 8: meeting everyone, And to be honest, this might sound naive,
Speaker 8: but I had no idea that there was a huge
Speaker 8: community around this kind.
Speaker 2: Of stuff, this topic.
Speaker 3: I was blaying.
Speaker 8: I I know about the big names, of course, and
Speaker 8: that's kind of what I've been following for a long time.
Speaker 8: But out here i've been in Arizona, I've been pretty
Speaker 8: pretty isolated. There's very few people, if any, that work
Speaker 8: on this, and there's plenty of people that are interested
Speaker 8: in hearing about it, but I didn't really have anyone
Speaker 8: out here for many years to talk about this subject
Speaker 8: in any meaningful way. And so going to the Cosmic Summit,
Speaker 8: I started talking to everyone just talking about what I've
Speaker 8: been working on, and it just blew my mind how
Speaker 8: many people were interested in this and actually trying to
Speaker 8: do work on it too, And so that's kind of
Speaker 8: how I got into this. My background is pretty varied.
Speaker 8: I've had an unusual path. My background is primarily in finance. Originally,
Speaker 8: I started working at a hedge fund in June of
Speaker 8: twenty ten. I was there and I ended up covering
Speaker 8: Tesla when they ipoed on the stock market for the
Speaker 8: first time in June twenty ten, and that sent me
Speaker 8: down a pretty long path, pretty intense path. I spent
Speaker 8: most of my career as a securities trader at Edward
Speaker 8: Jones Investments, and over there I covered a lot of
Speaker 8: tech and I did a.
Speaker 2: Variety of trading roles.
Speaker 8: But in twenty twenty I transitioned to AI and I
Speaker 8: focused on computer vision applications in autonomous vehicles or automated vehicles.
Speaker 8: And I did that for a long time, and now
Speaker 8: I'm trying I realized that there is probably an overlap
Speaker 8: in skill sets that is not common, that is useful
Speaker 8: for understanding megalithic structures around the world, all of them,
Speaker 8: in my opinion. And when I started realizing that, I started,
Speaker 8: instead of applying my skill sets towards automated vehicles, which
Speaker 8: I did a lot of work in, I wanted to
Speaker 8: apply it towards this topic instead, because it's just way
Speaker 8: more fun and a way more interesting problem to solve,
Speaker 8: in my opinion.
Speaker 3: Sounds good. Sounds good. So what made you end up
Speaker 3: at the Cosmic Summit? I guess that guy, Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 8: Yeah, Pavin Moha and and you know, I'll talk a
Speaker 8: little bit about this, but I think that India has
Speaker 8: a lot to offer this topic that most other places
Speaker 8: in the world don't have. And Pravine is the only
Speaker 8: person I know that is really taken it, taking the
Speaker 8: bowl by the horns and tried to show the world
Speaker 8: how much India has to offer in this regard. So
Speaker 8: India has a unique advantage. It has the Himalayas to
Speaker 8: the north, and it is a peninsula, so it's surrounded
Speaker 8: by oceans towards the south.
Speaker 2: And so what that means is that over the.
Speaker 8: Course of its entire history, it has been relatively it's
Speaker 8: a relatively untouched civilization, and it's an ancient civilization too,
Speaker 8: long running, long standing civilization, continuously going. And I'm not
Speaker 8: saying there wasn't any war, but in general, relative to
Speaker 8: other places in the world, it was relatively untouched. And
Speaker 8: so megalithic structure is in India exist all over the place.
Speaker 8: There's tons of them, not well over hundreds, maybe even thousands,
Speaker 8: and there's all different types. And you can call them temples,
Speaker 8: you can call them tombs, you can call them.
Speaker 2: Whatever you want. But these structures are insane. Oh Hi William.
Speaker 8: I actually saw your your show here with Nick, and
Speaker 8: you mentioned something really good about language that I might
Speaker 8: talk about a little later. So India has these megalithic
Speaker 8: structures all over the place, and they're really well preserved.
Speaker 8: Everywhere else in the world, these megalithic structures are usually
Speaker 8: heavily destroyed, eroded, they've been picked away, they're taking looted
Speaker 8: and all this stuff. But India they're not that heavily
Speaker 8: destroyed by comparison, and there's so many of them. And
Speaker 8: India has its own form of hieroglyphs.
Speaker 2: It's a it's.
Speaker 8: These like heavily ornately carved design and statues all across
Speaker 8: their buildings, adorned everywhere. Every square inch of these temples
Speaker 8: and whatever you want to call them is usually adorned
Speaker 8: with intricate architecture, intricate design, and that's the Indian form
Speaker 8: of higheroglyphs, and they tell a really powerful story. Pravian
Speaker 8: Mohan is the person that I've seen that has really
Speaker 8: tried to demonstrate this to the world. I'm not going
Speaker 8: to be able to do anywhere near as much work
Speaker 8: on it as he is, but I hope to start
Speaker 8: to bring together a lot of different understandings from different places,
Speaker 8: because I think now is the time to start solving
Speaker 8: what all these megalithic structures all around the world are
Speaker 8: about by trying to reverse engineer their function.
Speaker 2: And I think that what we're.
Speaker 8: Going to find is that these megalithic structures are related
Speaker 8: in some way and they share patterns that overlap each other.
Speaker 8: And I'll try to demonstrate a little bit about that.
Speaker 8: But the point is that we may not be able
Speaker 8: to solve everything from these megalithic structures on an isolated basis,
Speaker 8: just what the evidence is on the ground because of
Speaker 8: how destroyed or looted or whatever they are. But if
Speaker 8: we can start realizing that these megalithic structures all over
Speaker 8: the world are related, maybe we can start cross pollinating
Speaker 8: understanding from one and apply it to another. And since
Speaker 8: there's so many examples of this all over the world,
Speaker 8: I think that this is an area that is ripe
Speaker 8: to be kind of like exploited, and I think that
Speaker 8: India has quite a lot to offer because of this.
Speaker 8: There are numerous structures that represent megalithic construction that are
Speaker 8: impossible to build even with modern technology. One that's like
Speaker 8: really not as well known that I think everyone should
Speaker 8: know about is Kailasa Temple in India. If you haven't
Speaker 8: seen Colossa Temple, for Vi Mohan has a great video
Speaker 8: on it, but you can watch any Colossa Temple is
Speaker 8: this enormous temple structure built out of one giant mountainside,
Speaker 8: one stone that builds the entire complex, and it's carved
Speaker 8: from the top down in the salt, which is near
Speaker 8: the same hardness as granite.
Speaker 2: And it's just impossible to build today.
Speaker 8: We can't do it, not even close, let alone however
Speaker 8: many hundreds or thousands of years ago. And so I
Speaker 8: want to start trying to bring some of that into
Speaker 8: the conversation, cross pollinating understandings from others and applying them well.
Speaker 5: I would not say that it is impossible to build
Speaker 5: today in terms of general architecture, but it is impossible
Speaker 5: to build today in terms of fine art that we
Speaker 5: encountered at the same time. So we will take more
Speaker 5: time than we could today possibly afford to create set
Speaker 5: the thing right. So it's incredible that in a primitive
Speaker 5: time they could find people to do that job and
Speaker 5: be as perfect as it was. So that's the fascinating
Speaker 5: part to me that regard, so to.
Speaker 8: Bring in a little bit of finance, one of the
Speaker 8: things is is we have to start really looking at
Speaker 8: what the narrative around all these tombs or temples really
Speaker 8: is implying. Because, Okay, sure, maybe if you put an
Speaker 8: extreme amount of effort with primitive tools and an infinite
Speaker 8: amount of time and so on, you might be able
Speaker 8: to eventually do something like this. However, there's so many
Speaker 8: of these structures all over the world, and you have
Speaker 8: to really start understanding the economics at the time period
Speaker 8: of what the narratives are implying. So, for example, in Egypt,
Speaker 8: the current narrative for the Giza plateau is that it
Speaker 8: was a national project and a massive labor force was
Speaker 8: dedicated to this task for about thirty years. Now, to
Speaker 8: put some numbers behind this, just to get a little
Speaker 8: bit of a flavor of what I'm talking about, In
Speaker 8: Egypt alone, there's more than one hundred and thirty known
Speaker 8: pyramids there. Sudan also has hundreds of pyramids, so together
Speaker 8: between them, three to four hundred pyramids between those two countries.
Speaker 2: And then these pyramid structures are all over the world.
Speaker 8: In Mexico you have hundreds of known pyramids, maybe thousands
Speaker 8: if you include the ones we don't know about. South
Speaker 8: America riddled with pyramids all over the place, Asia riddled
Speaker 8: with pyramids all over the place. I've heard about many
Speaker 8: in Europe that I don't know too much about. But
Speaker 8: these things are all literally thousands of just pyramid structures alone,
Speaker 8: nothing else, just pyramid structures alone. And now you add
Speaker 8: in on top of that all the other megalithic structures
Speaker 8: that are not pyramids, like angkor watt Kailash Temple. I'm
Speaker 8: going to talk a little bit about taj Mahal today
Speaker 8: and many others around the world. There are so many
Speaker 8: of these heavily engineered, highly sophisticated, multidisciplinary megalithic structures that
Speaker 8: are demonstrating deep understanding of principles across a numerous subjects
Speaker 8: all in one. This is not a coincidence. There's no
Speaker 8: such thing as thousands of coincidences. And so every major
Speaker 8: civilization around the world, every major continent I'm not sure
Speaker 8: about Antarctica, every single one is demonstrating that they had
Speaker 8: advanced knowledge and ability to build these structures repeatedly. And
Speaker 8: so what I was saying about the finance and economic
Speaker 8: side of it. It's not like you just become an
Speaker 8: advanced civilization and you get to stay that way for free.
Speaker 8: You have to really understand what the economics of that
Speaker 8: narrative is implying. It's true that you are dedicating a
Speaker 8: massive labor force of highly skilled workers. They have to
Speaker 8: be artisan workers to be able to pull off the
Speaker 8: engineering in these structures, and you do that for an
Speaker 8: extended period of time, like thirty years just for one project,
Speaker 8: and then repeat that again and again for the one
Speaker 8: hundred and thirty pyramids whatever in Egypt and so on
Speaker 8: and all the other ones. This is exactly how you
Speaker 8: collapse a civilization. If none of these structures generate any
Speaker 8: kind of economic or practical utility to the society, this
Speaker 8: is going to destroy the civilization. It's not free to
Speaker 8: just be a civilization and expected to just go on
Speaker 8: like that. Especially for the history of Egypt where they're
Speaker 8: talking about these things, where it lasted for thousands and
Speaker 8: thousands of years. No such civilization can dedicate the labor
Speaker 8: force and the economics behind it to these tasks for
Speaker 8: no economic utility at all.
Speaker 2: That would that's not sustainable.
Speaker 5: That's a good point, I guess, well, I'm not sure
Speaker 5: that the if we talk about megaliths and not pyramids,
Speaker 5: I'm not sure that there is an economical factor there,
Speaker 5: because the benefit are enormous in terms of the pyramids,
Speaker 5: I would say, and what you're saying, I would say
Speaker 5: that coincidence explaining for starts, and that you are right
Speaker 5: in terms of the workforce, because if you look to
Speaker 5: Thailand alone, you find countless sights with this replicated statues
Speaker 5: of women of men dancing. The sculpture goes around, you
Speaker 5: can see the back of the sculpture that is coming
Speaker 5: from the rock. So it backs the question how many
Speaker 5: workers they have, how many sculptures they had, because who
Speaker 5: can replicate such a thing constantly, like ten figures that
Speaker 5: are exactly the same. We would need a robot to
Speaker 5: do that today, to have that kind of precision. It's
Speaker 5: not that we couldn't do it, it's just we don't find
Speaker 5: technology in their time to be able to do that.
Speaker 5: And that's the puzzle. And in fact, another point that
Speaker 5: you present is that the timeframe is too short even
Speaker 5: for our means today, so it will take exponential more
Speaker 5: time to create any of these structures and we'll have
Speaker 5: the economical factor on top of it, which I think
Speaker 5: back then was not as constraining as it is today
Speaker 5: because if we consider it as a global effort, what
Speaker 5: purpose is there your question, and it is a very
Speaker 5: good one, For what purpose will we create something that
Speaker 5: generates nothing? It must generate something, right, But it doesn't
Speaker 5: mean he has to be economical in my perspective.
Speaker 8: Yeah, And the argument I'm making is that it's fine
Speaker 8: as a one off to do megalithic structures, and maybe
Speaker 8: you can invest your society into this one time, two times,
Speaker 8: ten times. But to do it in a repeated fashion
Speaker 8: over and over again, for that's where it becomes catastrophic,
Speaker 8: because that doesn't generate any progress. And it also doesn't
Speaker 8: line up with the idea that this is a culture
Speaker 8: that values technological progress, because if they were valuing technological progress,
Speaker 8: they would be applying it for practical purposes. If they
Speaker 8: were purely valuing technological progress and only to build these structures,
Speaker 8: they're pigeonholing themselves first of all, in their technology. And
Speaker 8: it like humans are curious people in general. It's not
Speaker 8: like when you learn something you only want to apply
Speaker 8: it exactly one way. And only one way, and you
Speaker 8: don't want to apply that concept to anything else. The
Speaker 8: value of advanced understanding is the ability to apply it
Speaker 8: in more than one way and be able to demonstrate
Speaker 8: control over that. And also you're right that like if again,
Speaker 8: given enough time and given enough people, given enough resources,
Speaker 8: you can effectively do infinitely anything. But the issue is
Speaker 8: that they're doing They're carving all these ornate structures into
Speaker 8: really hard stone, like for example, Kylost Temple, Colossa temples
Speaker 8: carved out of Assault, which is near the near granite
Speaker 8: in terms of its hardness. And they're not just carving
Speaker 8: major structures, they're also carving fine minute detail for the structures.
Speaker 8: And they're even, like you were saying, carving behind the
Speaker 8: statue to carve out the negative space behind it.
Speaker 5: They can make chains out of the stone, even chains.
Speaker 8: Yeah, they made chains out of it too. Yeah, all
Speaker 8: kinds of crazy stuff I've seen. And so this is
Speaker 8: where it becomes really hard to believe that this is
Speaker 8: the only meaning that the only way that they applied
Speaker 8: their advanced skill was for non practical purposes, and that
Speaker 8: there was no practical application for these same advanced skills,
Speaker 8: and the other part of it is that in order
Speaker 8: to build these structures it requires advanced understanding and many subjects,
Speaker 8: not just one civil engineering for sure, and coreing and
Speaker 8: all this, but also they're demonstrating over and over again
Speaker 8: that they understood polar alignment, because these structures are aligned
Speaker 8: perfectly to polar north and southeast west. So they have
Speaker 8: demonstrated that they understand somewhat what is magnetism and why
Speaker 8: it might matter. And they put these things on magnetic
Speaker 8: lay lines and like again one off maybe, but again
Speaker 8: and again and again. This is where coincidences can't happen.
Speaker 8: They didn't just accidentally do that precisely.
Speaker 2: And we're part of.
Speaker 8: The engineering argument here is that precision is not an accident,
Speaker 8: maybe as a one off, but precision is not consistently
Speaker 8: an accident.
Speaker 2: Precision is effort.
Speaker 8: It is extreme effort, especially at the degree of precision
Speaker 8: that they're going for, in order to achieve precision.
Speaker 2: At that high at that high.
Speaker 8: Skill level, that have to be done intentionally that you
Speaker 8: can't you don't get to do that by accident, over
Speaker 8: and over again.
Speaker 5: So I would say, in my research in terms of
Speaker 5: megobids that I think can be applied to pyramids, can
Speaker 5: be applied to the temples that you are speaking. I
Speaker 5: find that the disciplines necessary start with geomancy, start with
Speaker 5: the recognition of fault lines and underwater underground waterways. Then
Speaker 5: you have the knowledge of the tilloric lines. Then you
Speaker 5: have the mineralogy that you specifically choose for specifically purpose
Speaker 5: in statistically places of the construction itself. Then you have
Speaker 5: astronomical knowledge that get takes thousands of years because you
Speaker 5: take it it's how many years for one degree? I
Speaker 5: don't know if it's eighty eight years for each each
Speaker 5: degree on the sky.
Speaker 2: Seventy years you're talking about the.
Speaker 5: Seventy two seventy two, right, seventy years seventy two years
Speaker 5: for just one degree of the sky, So it would
Speaker 5: require multiplied ad for the.
Speaker 2: And again you're demonstrating that they understood this back then.
Speaker 5: Sure. And then you need to understand second geometry. And
Speaker 5: then you need to understand acoustics, because all of them
Speaker 5: display most of them display knowledge of acoustics and resonates.
Speaker 5: So on this alone we have here a vast way
Speaker 5: of multidisciplinary knowledge that we today do not possess. So
Speaker 5: we are really discovering it today.
Speaker 8: I also want to say this is understood in academia,
Speaker 8: but maybe it's worth saying there is one layer of
Speaker 8: difficulty that is theory, and that can be hard, but
Speaker 8: applying theory in practice in the real world is at
Speaker 8: minimum ten times harder than.
Speaker 2: The theory of it.
Speaker 8: So what I want to say is that it's one
Speaker 8: thing to just understand something.
Speaker 2: It's a way.
Speaker 8: Exponentially higher degree of difficulty to understand something and then
Speaker 8: apply that understanding in the real world in a practical way.
Speaker 2: That is a way harder task.
Speaker 8: And so that's also I think relevant, is that not
Speaker 8: only do they understand these concepts, but they understood them
Speaker 8: well enough to apply them and pre plan them and
Speaker 8: make structures that had to be pre planned in order
Speaker 8: to achieve those results. And you mentioned a lot of
Speaker 8: different subjects, and these subjects are copy like. The understanding
Speaker 8: of these subjects appears to be universal because acoustics, the geometry, astronomy,
Speaker 8: the civil engineering, and so on and so on. These
Speaker 8: things are not understandings that were confined to a specific civilization.
Speaker 8: These things are demonstrated and applied across numerous civils independent civilizations,
Speaker 8: which means that they were all able to get to
Speaker 8: that level of achievement somehow, And supposedly a lot of
Speaker 8: these civilizations never talk to each other.
Speaker 5: And.
Speaker 8: Or maybe they were learning by osmosis too. I guess
Speaker 8: anything is possible.
Speaker 7: I mean, in Egypt, it's insane that there's I mean,
Speaker 7: there's there's all sorts of evidence. I've been there twice,
Speaker 7: to the Great Pyramids, and then some of the museums
Speaker 7: around Giza, and then Alexandria, well it's not called Alexandria anymore,
Speaker 7: but there's certain stones that are like I guess you
Speaker 7: would call them cast offs, where it shows like how
Speaker 7: did they build this? Like I mean like right, and
Speaker 7: this is kind of what we're delving into, but there
Speaker 7: they didn't build it the way that they are telling
Speaker 7: us period, or that the narrative says, right. I mean,
Speaker 7: there's all kinds of etchings that look like just saws, lasers,
Speaker 7: all kinds of stuff, and there's all kinds of evidence
Speaker 7: for that, even cit in museums, and like you can
Speaker 7: walk up and literally touch it where there's a partially
Speaker 7: cut line that is just still a tat.
Speaker 3: I don't even know how to describe it.
Speaker 7: I have to find a picture, but it looks like
Speaker 7: a circular saw the cut the thing, but there's like
Speaker 7: remnants of that where it wasn't chiseled off. It's unbelievable anyway.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's a lot Vanderwick's work, I think.
Speaker 8: Yeah, he also talks a lot about this where there's
Speaker 8: plenty of tools like but again it's impossible to have
Speaker 8: thousands of coincidences. There's plenty of evidence of machine tools.
Speaker 7: Right, and for them to just I'm just reiterating on
Speaker 7: your point where the fact that I mean, there's what
Speaker 7: five main things that they say that these megalithic structures
Speaker 7: are for, and whether it's funerary, astronomical, you know stuff
Speaker 7: which which we know right, ritual, ceremonies, territorial, tribal, and
Speaker 7: cultural technical cool, right, but why are they building them?
Speaker 7: And that's what I'm here today.
Speaker 2: Yeah, So that's what I'm trying to do. And so.
Speaker 8: This is a good kind of launching platform because what
Speaker 8: I'm trying to do is a form of pattern recognition.
Speaker 8: And what I'm seeing is that there are various concepts
Speaker 8: that are copied and pasted in various ways across these
Speaker 8: megalithic structures, and what I'm trying to achieve is I'm
Speaker 8: trying to find the base primitives, what is the most fundamental,
Speaker 8: most primitive step one functional purpose of megalithic structures, because
Speaker 8: it doesn't make sense that these things are tombs. And
Speaker 8: so I'm going to start what I'm going to get
Speaker 8: into what I'm talking about today, but what i want
Speaker 8: to demonstrate is these patterns of similarity between megalithic structures.
Speaker 8: And so maybe this will be a good place for
Speaker 8: me to start. I can start share screening if you want,
Speaker 8: and I'm going to start repping by I'm going to
Speaker 8: start by wrapping Arizona because for how common and frequent
Speaker 8: pyramid structures and other megalithic structures are in the world,
Speaker 8: it's surprising how few, if any, megalithic structures are in America.
Speaker 8: There's no really known pyramids, even though in Mexico there's
Speaker 8: tons of them, and we know that in Arizona and
Speaker 8: the Grand Canyon. Arizona and Grand Canyon used to be
Speaker 8: part of Mexico long ago. And so what I want
Speaker 8: to start doing is start attacking the narrative that is
Speaker 8: going on right now, and the Grand Canyon demonstrates some
Speaker 8: suspicious activity, some signs of things that don't match the narrative.
Speaker 8: And so if you don't know, the current mainstream narrative
Speaker 8: of the Grand Canyon is that the Grand Canyon was
Speaker 8: carved out by massive water flow over millions of years.
Speaker 8: And what we see elsewhere in Arizona, everywhere else in
Speaker 8: Arizona except the Grand Canyon, what we see is patterns
Speaker 8: of water erosion that are consistent with heavy rainfall. And
Speaker 8: at the Cosmic Summit, Randall Carlson talked a little bit
Speaker 8: about this in his presentation and he demonstrated around the
Speaker 8: Arizona except for the Grand Canyon, everywhere else in Arizona
Speaker 8: you see heavy rainfall water erosion patterns and this is
Speaker 8: characterized by smooth edges, rounded shapes.
Speaker 2: And irregular grooves.
Speaker 8: And what we see at the Grand Canyon is not that.
Speaker 8: So this picture that I'm showing here is taken from
Speaker 8: the South Rim and this picture is just to demonstrate
Speaker 8: a few of the things that do not line up with.
Speaker 2: Heavy rainfall.
Speaker 8: And that's the let's see which screen you can see
Speaker 8: my mouse?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 8: Yeah, so over here you're going to see flat shapes.
Speaker 3: I think you can see the mouth.
Speaker 2: Can you see my mouth? It was.
Speaker 3: Okay, I'm sorry, I'm blowing.
Speaker 8: What you see is flat surfaces. You see rectangular shapes.
Speaker 8: The water erosion grooves are vertical, if not perfectly vertical,
Speaker 8: but roughly vertical, and you see consistent regularity. These intervals
Speaker 8: are consistent, and you also see them in parallel lines
Speaker 8: over and over again. Now to kind of contrast that,
Speaker 8: I want to show what water erosion looks like with
Speaker 8: heavy rainfall. So this is the sphinx, and the perimeter
Speaker 8: wall of the sphinx is what we classically understand is
Speaker 8: the water erosion pattern for heavy rainfall. So again you
Speaker 8: see smooth edges, you see rounded shapes, irregular grooves that
Speaker 8: are not in regular interval, and they're also angled quite
Speaker 8: a lot. So this is what we classically understand would
Speaker 8: be heavy rainfall. And every major civilization, every major religion,
Speaker 8: even they all have a story of a big flood story,
Speaker 8: a big, huge flood happened somewhere, and we even have
Speaker 8: some idea of what maybe that timeline is. We have
Speaker 8: at least the Younger drive hypothesis that demonstrates that maybe
Speaker 8: that could be where a big flood event maybe happen
Speaker 8: or something like that. But again the narrative in the
Speaker 8: Grand Canyon is that this was created over millions of years.
Speaker 8: This Grand Canyon was created over millions of years. So
Speaker 8: something is odd about that, because if there was a
Speaker 8: massive flood that happened all over the world and everywhere
Speaker 8: else in Arizona is showing the smooth edges, rounded shapes
Speaker 8: and all this heavy rainfall water erosion patterns, but we're
Speaker 8: not seeing it in the Grand Canyon, even though this
Speaker 8: is supposed to be millions of years old, and the
Speaker 8: younger dryest is supposed to be ten twelve thousand BCS,
Speaker 8: something like this that's supposed to be relatively recent in history.
Speaker 8: Now we also see at the Grand Canyon a variety
Speaker 8: of these pyramid structures, these pyramid looking shapes. And now
Speaker 8: something that is inconsistent with again the narrative is if
Speaker 8: you had a structure like this pyramid sticking out whatever
Speaker 8: this is, let's just say it was a rock at
Speaker 8: one point, just some random rock, big rock sticking out,
Speaker 8: and it was bombarded by water in the same direction
Speaker 8: of travel over and over and over again. The type
Speaker 8: of erosion pattern that you would expect would be more
Speaker 8: of a teardrop shape. You would not expect to see
Speaker 8: a flat edge, then straight edges on the sides, and
Speaker 8: then somehow it carves out the back flat as well.
Speaker 8: And then of course why would it create a step
Speaker 8: pattern specifically here but not do that anywhere else around it. Now,
Speaker 8: these pyramid structures at the Grand Canyon are not unusual.
Speaker 6: Uh.
Speaker 8: You actually see these pyramid structures more than once, multiple times.
Speaker 8: In fact, I think there are dozens of them that
Speaker 8: are known. And the other thing is, I just want
Speaker 8: to show you just real quick. Here's someone that I
Speaker 8: posted on my ax. You also see all kinds of
Speaker 8: megalithic structures. Are not megalithic, but you see massive rectangular
Speaker 8: cut walks at the Grand Canyon as well, and hikers
Speaker 8: will find these things all over the place and they
Speaker 8: kind of look like they're arranged, and.
Speaker 3: Yoh, sheesh. I think when you play the video it
Speaker 3: ends up cutting into your audio for some reason.
Speaker 2: Yeah, oh, I'm sorry.
Speaker 3: Yeah, No, it's a weird thing that's been happening recently.
Speaker 2: Okay, well that's really all I wanted to show with that.
Speaker 8: Anyway, the point I wanted to convey is that it's
Speaker 8: not uncommon to see this stuff, and so this is
Speaker 8: starting to become really suspicious. It doesn't line up with
Speaker 8: the narrative, especially to see rectangular blocks like that all
Speaker 8: the time, and just add a little flavor text. When
Speaker 8: you go to the Grand Canyon, your pads are really
Speaker 8: well pre defined, and the majority of the Grand Canyon,
Speaker 8: which has roads all through it, road systems all through it,
Speaker 8: most of it is blocked off for reasons that don't
Speaker 8: seem to make any sense. And when you have hikers
Speaker 8: that go to maybe the wrong place in the Grand Canyon,
Speaker 8: it's pretty common to see black Hawk helicopters flying around there,
Speaker 8: and there's plenty of videos of this over and over
Speaker 8: again all over YouTube. So again and again we're seeing
Speaker 8: things that don't seem to make any sense relative to
Speaker 8: the narrative.
Speaker 2: So I also want to.
Speaker 8: Demonstrate that there is a water is a really common
Speaker 8: feature at megalithic structures. So it's there are water reservoirs
Speaker 8: all around the Geeze at pyramids and then Encore Watt
Speaker 8: right here shows artificial water reservoirs. I think one side
Speaker 8: of this water reservoir is like a mile long, and
Speaker 8: Encore Watt the area surrounding it has artificially created water
Speaker 8: channels all throughout. It's covered in water channels in Peru
Speaker 8: or sorry, in South America, including Peru. All over South America,
Speaker 8: you'll see the same thing, water channels all over the place. Mexico,
Speaker 8: I think they're starting to believe that there are underground
Speaker 8: water channels. And of course I'm going to say this wrong,
Speaker 8: can never pronounce it taot toakan. They're also that pyramid structure.
Speaker 8: Also they know that there's a water table underneath it
Speaker 8: as well, and you can and you're going to see
Speaker 8: this over and over again. I'm gonna when I talk
Speaker 8: about the taj Mahal, it'll also be there as well.
Speaker 8: Sound well, yeah, not only underground, but yes, underground waterways
Speaker 8: and in the case of Anco and reservoirs and all
Speaker 8: all kinds of things. And and the central point here
Speaker 8: is that water is a common element for megalithic structures.
Speaker 8: They're commonly found by them. And so again, what I'm
Speaker 8: trying to achieve here is I'm trying to find patterns
Speaker 8: of similarity and start figuring out if there's a way
Speaker 8: to solve from other megalithic structures and apply those understandings.
Speaker 8: And so what I'm trying to build. The argument for
Speaker 8: is that water must be a significant and important element
Speaker 8: of the functional purpose behind megal many of these megalithic structures. So, uh,
Speaker 8: before I get into to the pyramids, I want to
Speaker 8: rep Arizona just a little bit more.
Speaker 2: I like this picture. This is also from the South.
Speaker 8: Rim, and again here you can kind of see a
Speaker 8: step pattern, a step pyramid pattern showing and even over
Speaker 8: here you kind of see it looks like there's a
Speaker 8: pathway coming out of whatever this structure used to be.
Speaker 2: But I don't like this picture because of this.
Speaker 8: I like this picture because it demonstrates two types of
Speaker 8: water erosion in the same picture. So the top half
Speaker 8: shows the water erosion that is stereotypical and commonly seen
Speaker 8: and demonstrated at the Grand Canyon, which is the If
Speaker 8: you zoom in, you'll see again regularly spaced intervals of
Speaker 8: rectangular shapes and this step pattern and these vertical lines,
Speaker 8: and of course these are parallel. And if you can
Speaker 8: take a picture basically anywhere and the Grand you'll see this.
Speaker 8: Everything back here is that miles and miles and miles
Speaker 8: of these parallel lines, which is hard to do in nature.
Speaker 8: But what you see towards the bottom. Is you get
Speaker 8: away from that, You go back to those rounded edges,
Speaker 8: smooth edges of rounded shapes, irregular grooves. You get away
Speaker 8: from the flat rectangles and the hard and the hard shapes,
Speaker 8: these hard shapes, you don't see them at the bottom.
Speaker 8: And what's really interesting that flips all of this on
Speaker 8: its head is that the water erosion from heavy rainfall
Speaker 8: is found towards the bottom, which is supposed to be
Speaker 8: relatively recent in history. But this water erosion pattern is
Speaker 8: not at the top, which the erosion pattern that's at
Speaker 8: the top is supposed to be the oldest water erosion
Speaker 8: that occurs. So this really flips on its head. Why
Speaker 8: is there recent water erosion patterns at the bottom but
Speaker 8: not at the top. And so that's really where things
Speaker 8: get super suspicious. And here's just another picture to demonstrate
Speaker 8: that these pyramid structures are not uncommon in the Grand Canyon.
Speaker 8: There's dozens of them that are known. And again, hard
Speaker 8: hard shapes, square shapes, rectangular hard edges, corners, and so on.
Speaker 1: Why is it that you think, though, that pyramids are
Speaker 1: absent when we discuss America, Why is that not part
Speaker 1: of the official narrative do you think.
Speaker 2: I don't.
Speaker 8: Actually, I don't have a good answer for that. I wanna,
Speaker 8: I wanna maybe so something that's a little controversial in Peru.
Speaker 8: I wasn't really going to say this. In Peru, you
Speaker 8: see that they have this whole area that's just gray
Speaker 8: and all the megalithic structures. The land is just gray
Speaker 8: for miles, stretches in every direction, and you see the
Speaker 8: outlines of megalithic structures. It almost looks like some sort
Speaker 8: of nuclear bomb went off and destroyed everything.
Speaker 6: They actually say. They actually say Peru has some the
Speaker 6: pyramids are older than the ones in Egypt. There's actually
Speaker 6: evidence that says that it's pretty interesting.
Speaker 8: Yeah, and I understand that there's lots of megalithic structures
Speaker 8: that aren't completely destroyed, but I'm talking specifically about the
Speaker 8: area in Peru where it's just gray and it just
Speaker 8: looks like you only see the outlines of them and
Speaker 8: nothing else. In Hinduism, the Mahabadata one of the main
Speaker 8: the three main religious texts. They give kind of an
Speaker 8: explanation of what could have happened there.
Speaker 2: And this is going to be super controversial. I'm not
Speaker 2: trying to die on this.
Speaker 5: Hill.
Speaker 8: That's why I'm not really saying about anything about it.
Speaker 8: But what I can say is that there are murals
Speaker 8: in South America inside the temples that show the god
Speaker 8: Shiva flying around on the cloud, and they show it
Speaker 8: more than one time, blue skin somebody that looks just
Speaker 8: like Shiva in the murals, And why would there be
Speaker 8: any cross pollination of this idea?
Speaker 2: How they even know about Shiva?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 8: And so to kind of answer your qruestion, Brook, I
Speaker 8: think ended what is described in Hinduism is that there
Speaker 8: was a big war and this war ended up collapsing
Speaker 8: some of the civilizations out in you know, the western
Speaker 8: world or the South America, North America, and I think
Speaker 8: it didn't really develop is my guess of how that
Speaker 8: all happened. And there is some evidence of this because
Speaker 8: there's huge population drop offs, and in particular Indian populations
Speaker 8: dropped off during the time period that it suggested in
Speaker 8: the Mahabadata.
Speaker 7: I mean with with it comes to strut stone pyramids,
Speaker 7: but there was huge earthwork pyramids built later obviously right
Speaker 7: in the Mississippian cultures and the in places like that
Speaker 7: down in Louisiana, and uh, you know, well all through
Speaker 7: the Mississippi Valley and there's huge pyramids there, but they're
Speaker 7: not stone, they're not Yeah, they call the mounds, but
Speaker 7: at the end of the day, some of them are bigger,
Speaker 7: you know, at their base than even like Giza.
Speaker 5: So yeah, and you have to take in consideration that
Speaker 5: the land used to build those mounds is not local correct,
Speaker 5: it's rough.
Speaker 7: A lot of it's brought in right from vast far distances.
Speaker 7: So either way, you know, it's almost like it was
Speaker 7: a reset, almost or something.
Speaker 8: And I agree that there is plenty there probably is
Speaker 8: going to be megalithic structures in America that are not
Speaker 8: classically described that way. What I'm trying to get is,
Speaker 8: I'm trying to focus on things that demonstrate engineering as
Speaker 8: conventionally understood by today. And I would hope that we
Speaker 8: eventually solve all that other stuff. But things that have
Speaker 8: more pre defined shape and demonstrate clear engineering are easier
Speaker 8: to reverse engineer. But when it's a big dirt mound,
Speaker 8: that becomes really hard to reverse engineer. But I agree
Speaker 8: that hopefully someday we end up getting those types of answers.
Speaker 8: And again, what I'm trying to do here, I'm going
Speaker 8: to talk about features.
Speaker 2: That are a little bit more advanced.
Speaker 8: But the crux of what I'm trying to say is
Speaker 8: that these structures, in their true function, are multifunctional and
Speaker 8: have demonstrated multiple disciplines.
Speaker 2: That we already know about.
Speaker 8: And I'm trying to find the base primitive what is
Speaker 8: step one? And if we can find step one, we
Speaker 8: can then build the rest of our understanding on top
Speaker 8: of that. But right now it's kind of just this haphazard.
Speaker 8: You know, people are measuring and detailing things that they
Speaker 8: find here and there, but there isn't a cohesive way
Speaker 8: of bringing it all together and being able to tell
Speaker 8: a story around what's actually happening yet, And so this
Speaker 8: is the this is the I.
Speaker 5: Haven't read my book yet. Yeah.
Speaker 8: Well yeah, as I said, as of the Cosmic Summit,
Speaker 8: that was the first time I even knew that there
Speaker 8: was a large community around this. So i have to
Speaker 8: admit I'm very new to this. And I've also never
Speaker 8: really had many people to talk to about this.
Speaker 2: So a lot of this is stuff.
Speaker 8: That I've been ruminating about in my head for years,
Speaker 8: and I've been wanting to talk to people about it
Speaker 8: just to see if anything I've been working on makes
Speaker 8: any sense, And so this is I mean, I'm I'm
Speaker 8: hoping to get some feedback as well. I know I'm
Speaker 8: going to have things wrong, but again I'm trying to
Speaker 8: just make a good faith effort in finding what the similarities,
Speaker 8: what are the patterns that overlap between all these different
Speaker 8: megalithic structures, and whether that actually means something, because in
Speaker 8: my opinion, thousands of coincidences don't just happen by accident.
Speaker 5: Sure, and I'm merely suggested because I base all of
Speaker 5: it in science, so there is no speculation there. There's
Speaker 5: a few, but when there are, I explain that I'm speculating,
Speaker 5: and still I base it and provide many sources to
Speaker 5: where I'm finding the information. So that's the only reason
Speaker 5: that I suggested it. But I can say to you
Speaker 5: with no problem.
Speaker 2: Oh please, I mean I highly recommend it.
Speaker 5: I highly recommend it.
Speaker 2: Oh please do I would love to read it. Yeah.
Speaker 8: And in fact, after the last podcast I did, I
Speaker 8: got some people that sent me some of the work
Speaker 8: that also tailors into what I've been talking about. So
Speaker 8: it's also given me a little confidence that, like, even
Speaker 8: if I'm not exactly right, but I might be directionally
Speaker 8: right what other people are working on. So I'll get
Speaker 8: into saltwater electrolysis. But I want to introduce some concepts
Speaker 8: ahead of time and allow them to apply as I
Speaker 8: go through this. So I'm gonna wrap Arizona a little
Speaker 8: bit more. There's a place here in Phoenix called the
Speaker 8: Arizona Builtmore Hotel. And in this hotel there's a room
Speaker 8: called the Aztec Room. And you may have heard of
Speaker 8: the famous architect Frankloid Right, Frankloyd Wright has constructed a
Speaker 8: lot of buildings or helped design a lot of buildings
Speaker 8: in Phoenix, and the Aztec Room was one of the
Speaker 8: rooms that he helped design. And he was very into
Speaker 8: ancient archaeology. He studied the Pyramids, he studied Kitchnitza, he
Speaker 8: studied all these things. And I want to introduce what
Speaker 8: happened in this Aztech room. So in the as Tech
Speaker 8: Room in the center, there's this structure on the ceiling,
Speaker 8: and if you stand underneath this structure and you talk normally,
Speaker 8: it will sound.
Speaker 2: Like you're talking through a loud speaker. And around that
Speaker 2: structure on.
Speaker 8: The ceiling are these beams all the way around it
Speaker 8: in a circle pattern. And these beams, I want to
Speaker 8: make the argument appear to be related to acoustic tuning.
Speaker 8: In fact, I think that these beams are about sound amplification.
Speaker 8: And so again, if you stand in the middle of
Speaker 8: the room and you talk normally underneath this structure with
Speaker 8: these beams all the way around it, that it sounds
Speaker 8: like you're talking through a loud speaker.
Speaker 2: Now, I want to.
Speaker 8: Introduce this design and remember this because this will come
Speaker 8: up again when I talk about the Grand Chamber in
Speaker 8: the Pyramids. But I just want to demons show that
Speaker 8: this has been demonstrated in real life. So acoustics is
Speaker 8: another Like you said before, acoustics is another common aspect
Speaker 8: of megalithic.
Speaker 2: Structures all over the world.
Speaker 8: There are many structures that demonstrate advanced understanding of acoustics
Speaker 8: and have applied that understanding. And I want to play
Speaker 8: this video and he's going to be able to explain
Speaker 8: it better than me. So I'm just going to play
Speaker 8: this video, hopefully with sound. Let me know if the
Speaker 8: sound comes through.
Speaker 5: Yeah. When I hear the birds, no.
Speaker 2: No sound, bro no sound, no sound.
Speaker 5: Reproduce the sound of a bird that is typical of
Speaker 5: the area.
Speaker 3: Yes, yes, yeah, I've seen this something like this before.
Speaker 8: Okay, So I mean everyone here is familiar. So if
Speaker 8: you haven't seen it, you can look up this video.
Speaker 8: It's very short and it demonstrates what this is. And
Speaker 8: what I'm trying to say here is that in order
Speaker 8: to achieve that exact result where it sounds like a bird,
Speaker 8: this is highly precise. If you change the spacing on
Speaker 8: these steps, or make a mistake with these steps the
Speaker 8: spacing on these steps, it'll alter the sound and it
Speaker 8: won't sound like that. So in order to achieve that
Speaker 8: result on all four sides, I do have to do
Speaker 8: that intentionally. This is where I'm making the argument that
Speaker 8: precision is not an accident decision.
Speaker 4: Sorry, but I've thought that about like with some of
Speaker 4: the pyramids where they say it like lacks any art inside,
Speaker 4: because I have wondered it's like once you saw chiseling
Speaker 4: into shit, you're going to change Like it's not the
Speaker 4: same anymore. Like if you were trying to use somatics
Speaker 4: or frequencies or whatever. I mean, that could change things.
Speaker 8: Yeah, And one of the big problems is that if
Speaker 8: they've cleaned out the inside of the keys of pyramids,
Speaker 8: the copper pyramids, So a lot of evidence is probably lost,
Speaker 8: But this is just to say that acoustics is a
Speaker 8: common thing, and the megalithic structures all over the world
Speaker 8: have this some sort of acoustic tuning as an significant
Speaker 8: element of their construction. And this is another one of
Speaker 8: those patterns where multiple independent civilizations, multiple have demonstrated the
Speaker 8: application of understanding acoustics in their engine. And this has
Speaker 8: to be pre planned. You can't accidentally achieve this kind
Speaker 8: of precision, and you have to know that that's what
Speaker 8: you're doing in order to achieve it.
Speaker 5: Yeah, it's clearly intentional. And to me, this is just
Speaker 5: they it's just child play. This this sound of the
Speaker 5: birds them, it's just they knew this technology so well
Speaker 5: that this was just a trick, the party tricks. It's
Speaker 5: the least important of the acoustic effects that this pyramid has.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well that was pil because I know we can
Speaker 3: do this, so we'll just do that, you know what
Speaker 3: I'm saying.
Speaker 8: Yeah, right right, Even even if the point was just
Speaker 8: for fun, the fact that they did this for fun
Speaker 8: makes it even more ridiculous. But they hould this off
Speaker 8: like it's nothing for them.
Speaker 4: Now today it's like our biggerccoplish accomplishments like a fire
Speaker 4: meme or some shit.
Speaker 8: So I want to introduce saltwater electrolysis, or another way
Speaker 8: of saying it is sea water electrolysis. And this is
Speaker 8: actually a really simple reaction. It's all you need is
Speaker 8: to run an electric current through salt water. And what
Speaker 8: electrolysis does is it breaks apart the elements inside. So
Speaker 8: salt is sodium, chloride and ACL and water is H
Speaker 8: two zero And if you run an electric current through
Speaker 8: it at sufficient voltage, then you'll break apart the sodium
Speaker 8: and the chloride, and you'll break apart the hydrogen from
Speaker 8: the oxygen. You'll break apart at least one hydrogen from
Speaker 8: the Oh. Now, if you were to continue this reaction,
Speaker 8: there is a second step that happens after some time. Now,
Speaker 8: depending on the conditions, what can happen is that this
Speaker 8: hydrogen gas that's emitted from the salt water electrolysis can
Speaker 8: merge with the chlorine or combined with the chlorine, and
Speaker 8: it'll form hydrochloric acid. And why that's significant is because
Speaker 8: Christopher Dunn's team has found hydrochloric acid residue inside one
Speaker 8: of the shafts of the Coffer pyramid and hydrochloric and
Speaker 8: in just to iterate for Christopher Dunn, Christopher Dunn's belief
Speaker 8: is that they were pouring chemicals into the shafts to
Speaker 8: generate the chemical reactions needed and then they plugged them.
Speaker 8: But in my opinion, they weren't pouring chemicals down the shafts.
Speaker 8: All the chemicals that they needed were created inside just
Speaker 8: with salt water or seawater. And the benefit of doing
Speaker 8: saltwater electrolysis is that you also create sodium hydroxide and
Speaker 8: sodium so you're creating the important aspects here. You're creating
Speaker 8: hydrogen gas, chlorine gas, sodium hydroxide, so chlorine gas you
Speaker 8: know from pools, this is a great way to kill
Speaker 8: my organisms by chlorinating water. So bubbling chlorine gas through
Speaker 8: the water is a form of water treatment. Sodium hydroxide
Speaker 8: is also a known detergent, and this is also another
Speaker 8: way of cleaning the water. So what I'm trying to
Speaker 8: argue here is that if you're an advanced civilization need
Speaker 8: capable of building all these heavily engineered structures, and you
Speaker 8: have strong understanding not just in theory but in practice,
Speaker 8: that they've demonstrated of how to apply all these skills.
Speaker 8: While this civilization will also be thinking about needing fresh
Speaker 8: water and so saltwater electrolysis is actually a really easy
Speaker 8: way to filter water.
Speaker 2: Or at least clean it up.
Speaker 8: Now, if you allow the react, this is a slow reaction.
Speaker 8: By the way, it takes more than twenty four hours
Speaker 8: to go to the second step. So this thing that's
Speaker 8: demonstrated on the screen is the first step, but if
Speaker 8: you want it to progress into the second step, you
Speaker 8: would need about more than twenty four hours for the
Speaker 8: hydrogen gas and the chlorine gas to combine. The sodium
Speaker 8: hydroxide will form pretty quickly.
Speaker 5: If I may, how do you see the electric current
Speaker 5: being introduced and what metals we use to produce that current?
Speaker 8: So this is this is going to be controversial, but
Speaker 8: I need to build the argument that the boxes that
Speaker 8: we find inside these megalithic structures all over the world,
Speaker 8: including the pyramids, are part of an electrical system. And
Speaker 8: the smoking gun for this is that Pravian Mohan has
Speaker 8: a video of Anchor Wat that shows copper wires coming
Speaker 8: out of one of these ornate boxes at anchor Watt.
Speaker 8: Now this video was recently taken down by YouTube, though,
Speaker 8: but he told me that he's going to post it
Speaker 8: again about next week.
Speaker 2: But what I'm trying to say here is that these.
Speaker 8: More patterns of similarity between megalithic structures. We find boxes,
Speaker 8: heavily engineered boxes, different kinds, in different places. But so
Speaker 8: many of these heavily engineered boxes exist all over the world,
Speaker 8: all over the place. Taota Khan, the Giza Pyramids, the Serrapm,
Speaker 8: which is something I will talk about in a minute,
Speaker 8: and Korwat has one, the taj Mahal has two, and
Speaker 8: so on and so on so again. And one of
Speaker 8: the other issues with these boxes is that they referred
Speaker 8: to as tombs, and that's where they're supposed to bury
Speaker 8: human remains, but we never find human remains in these boxes.
Speaker 8: And the other problem with these boxes is that they're
Speaker 8: often incorrectly sized and vary in size by a wide
Speaker 8: amount a large amount. For example, the ones in the
Speaker 8: Serrapim are close to fifteen feet long, but the ones
Speaker 8: in the Pyramids, if I recall correctly, are around five
Speaker 8: feet long or so, and both of them are incorrectly.
Speaker 2: To be for human or human roomains.
Speaker 8: So what I'm trying to build the argument for is
Speaker 8: that the electrical current is likely coming from these boxes.
Speaker 8: But another thing that we also know is that Christopher
Speaker 8: Dunn's team has drilled a hole into the pyramids and
Speaker 8: he's found that they're filled with quartz sand. And we
Speaker 8: know about the pso electric effect is probably commonly understood
Speaker 8: right now, but just to quickly iterate, it is a
Speaker 8: concept that is understood with watches and even torches that
Speaker 8: if you strike at quartz crystal, it will generate an
Speaker 8: electric spark. And this is well understood and it's very simple,
Speaker 8: and so what there is an advantage here? Let me
Speaker 8: go to this little diagram here.
Speaker 3: You know, I want to ask this real quick.
Speaker 4: I'm gonna know forgetting about it is something I wanted
Speaker 4: to bring up before, and probably from Ricardo too, and
Speaker 4: you she should make anybody who knows this. Back in
Speaker 4: the day when I used to do like rituals and stuff,
Speaker 4: they used to use a lot of Egyptian deities, and you.
Speaker 3: Know, sometimes you.
Speaker 4: Give them offerings. I used to make Natron because that
Speaker 4: was something that supposedly they used the rituals. So I
Speaker 4: was like, all right, I'll make that and that consists
Speaker 4: of just baking soda and salt and you basically cook it.
Speaker 4: Now I'm wondering, like would that make any combination that
Speaker 4: you guys actually think would beautiful and shit like this,
Speaker 4: like like like maybe they're understanding why they actually made
Speaker 4: that stuff, Like.
Speaker 8: I mean, you're talking about substances that are really good
Speaker 8: at disinfecting, Yeah, which is similar to what I'm talking about. That's,
Speaker 8: in my opinion, the initial So step one treating water.
Speaker 8: You want to get rid of all the microorganisms, you
Speaker 8: want to clean it out, you want to eliminate all
Speaker 8: the pollution. And I'm going to make the argument that
Speaker 8: there are numerous features within the pyramids that demonstrate that
Speaker 8: this is the initial step. It's not the only thing,
Speaker 8: and there's more things that happened. But step one. What
Speaker 8: is step one? I think you need a filter water,
Speaker 8: and I think that what they're doing with this water
Speaker 8: is they're also moving it to the other pyramids. And
Speaker 8: so we also know that the etymology for the word
Speaker 8: chemistry comes from Egypt. Egypt used to be called Kempti
Speaker 8: or kemi. There's multiple names. I'm sorry, commit, commit, Yeah, sorry, commit,
Speaker 8: And so this is the etymology for the word chemistry,
Speaker 8: and I think Land of chem has done on his channel.
Speaker 8: He's done a lot of really good work showing that
Speaker 8: the southern pyramid is generating ammonia or creating ammonia, which
Speaker 8: is really useful for fertilizer. And so another big supporting
Speaker 8: feature is that the arid sands around these pyramids. This
Speaker 8: is a relatively newer feature. This area we know. And
Speaker 8: this is what this is not an opinion. It's understood
Speaker 8: that the entire area surrounding the pyramids, the Geza Pyramids,
Speaker 8: was lush and green, had lots of vegetation, very very
Speaker 8: different than what it is now.
Speaker 2: And so.
Speaker 8: Again, an advanced civilization that demonstrates a lot of understanding
Speaker 8: would be able to understand that ammonia.
Speaker 2: Is useful for fertilizer.
Speaker 8: And so I'm, in my opinion, once they're done treating
Speaker 8: this water and filtering it, they're sending this water to
Speaker 8: the other pyramids and using this water to do further things.
Speaker 8: And I think that's part of where Land of Kem
Speaker 8: basically picks it up and runs with it from there.
Speaker 8: So what I want to demonstrate is how salt water
Speaker 8: or seawater same thing. Seawater electrolysis will would occur.
Speaker 2: In the pyramids.
Speaker 8: So we know that there's water reservoirs all around the
Speaker 8: Geza Pairment and the Giza Plateau, and there is a
Speaker 8: water reservoir right here on the outside of the descending shaft,
Speaker 8: just one of many, and this would just be a
Speaker 8: gravity fed system where water would pour down from the
Speaker 8: reservoir to the subterranean chamber, and then you could keep
Speaker 8: filling this pyramid up up to the same height level
Speaker 8: as the water is on the outside. So, for example,
Speaker 8: if the water reservoir on the outside is above this
Speaker 8: entrance and above the Queen's chamber or around the Queen's chamber,
Speaker 8: then just purely with the gravity alone and nothing else,
Speaker 8: you can fill up to here at least with water,
Speaker 8: and that would just be off the water reservoir alone.
Speaker 8: And we know that there was a branch from the
Speaker 8: Nile River that came near these near these pyramids. Also,
Speaker 8: Christopher Dunn's team has also found seashells and clams down
Speaker 8: here in the subterranean chambers, and we have evidence of
Speaker 8: salt deposits all throughout the subterranean chamber and all the
Speaker 8: way up into the Queen's chamber as well. Salt deposits common,
Speaker 8: very common. In fact, in the subterranean chamber. In the
Speaker 8: old pictures, it looks like it's caked on there pretty hard.
Speaker 8: So there's a lot of evidence to suggest that water
Speaker 8: was flowing through this area, and also the current narrative
Speaker 8: just to establish that as well. The current narrative is
Speaker 8: that this was a mistake, effectively the subterranean chamber, and
Speaker 8: that they abandoned this and they instead decided to be
Speaker 8: build the Queen's Chamber. But just on the surface alone,
Speaker 8: that doesn't make any sense because, first of all, if
Speaker 8: they were trying to build something that was a toom,
Speaker 8: why did they build it underground instead of in the
Speaker 8: like were in the construction of the pyramid. And then
Speaker 8: on top of that, if this was a mistake, then
Speaker 8: why did they build this ascending shaft right here going
Speaker 8: all the way from that quote unquote mistake to the
Speaker 8: actual real thing. And so, in my opinion, what happening
Speaker 8: is you have ambient temperature water coming down into the
Speaker 8: descending shaft, and then what I think is happening here
Speaker 8: in the subterranean chamber is that the water is being
Speaker 8: heated and the hot water will be the one that
Speaker 8: rises up into this well shaft over here, and there's
Speaker 8: something called a countercyclical vortex.
Speaker 2: There's shaping on this.
Speaker 8: I don't want to get too much into this because
Speaker 8: when I talked to Randall Carlson about it, he kind
Speaker 8: of didn't want to talk about it for some reason.
Speaker 8: I think he's kind of gotten a lot of criticism
Speaker 8: for his like vortex thing, and maybe he doesn't want
Speaker 8: to talk about it. But in my opinion, what's happening
Speaker 8: here is that there's a countercyclical vortex where cold water
Speaker 8: is going in one way in a vortex, and then
Speaker 8: hot water is spinning counter to that going the other way.
Speaker 8: And so if you have clockwise rotation right to left
Speaker 8: for the cold water, and then for the hot water
Speaker 8: on the outside of the cold water counterclockwise rotation going
Speaker 8: the other way, you'll have a system that will be
Speaker 8: able to feed specifically hot water right here at this
Speaker 8: division into the well shaft going up. And this will
Speaker 8: combine heat and just a gravity fed system to fill
Speaker 8: up into this chamber. So heating it is just the
Speaker 8: first step. It's just to get water going, and it's
Speaker 8: to kind of get rid of the pollutants. That's why
Speaker 8: I think there's this what do you call this the pit?
Speaker 8: I think they call this the pit. So it makes
Speaker 8: sense because this process is.
Speaker 2: Going to have a lot of.
Speaker 8: What do you call it, like particulates, residue pollutants. This
Speaker 8: that a lot of nonsense. It's not what you need.
Speaker 8: So you need somewhere to dump it. And so if
Speaker 8: you heat the water, you'll just the only thing that'll
Speaker 8: make it back up is the hot water, and maybe
Speaker 8: the salt water will make it, but a lot of
Speaker 8: the larger particulates of clams, all that stuff. The reason
Speaker 8: why we only see the clams here and not up
Speaker 8: here is because they have this whole section here as
Speaker 8: an initial filtering mechanism, and the only function of this
Speaker 8: is just to generate heat and dump the remains.
Speaker 5: How is the heat generated?
Speaker 8: So that part I don't have a good answer for.
Speaker 8: But we do know that there's this construction on the side.
Speaker 8: There's this side room that looks like it's engineered as well. Yeah,
Speaker 8: so underwater heat. So one more thing about these boxes.
Speaker 8: So we have evidence in the Queen's chamber and in
Speaker 8: the King's chamber of a massive explosion.
Speaker 2: That's occurred.
Speaker 8: And when you look at the box that's in the
Speaker 8: Queen's chamber, that box, which I'm going to say, is
Speaker 8: initially a granite box, multi ton granite box. What it
Speaker 8: was originally, that box looks like a charcoal brick today.
Speaker 8: And you have to kind of think if every other
Speaker 8: box everywhere else in Egypt is this giant, heavily engineered
Speaker 8: granite box. This is not going to be the only
Speaker 8: one in Egypt.
Speaker 2: That's not.
Speaker 8: So what I'm getting at is I don't know how
Speaker 8: to solve the boxes in its entirety. What I'm trying
Speaker 8: to say is principles and solved by the principles alone,
Speaker 8: and then fill in the pieces.
Speaker 5: If I may let me just give you might not
Speaker 5: have this piece of information. So first of all, in
Speaker 5: order to puifyde the water, what we find in megalytic
Speaker 5: sites is that the purification was done by residents alone.
Speaker 5: So I give you the example of the Osiris cheft.
Speaker 5: This is right next to the pyramid, and you find
Speaker 5: three vertical chefs that are not connected to anything. They
Speaker 5: were left blocked. You have three different levels and at
Speaker 5: the bottom level you find water. That water is completely pure,
Speaker 5: although it's filled with litter, it has rotten wood in,
Speaker 5: it has debris, and it's absolutely pure. Why because the
Speaker 5: resonance of the site. And it's the only autonomous site
Speaker 5: that I've studied so far that doesn't need the introduction
Speaker 5: of artificial sound into it. It creates own sound by
Speaker 5: the three additional shafts that are not connected. So what
Speaker 5: happens is is the creation of what is called by
Speaker 5: science now today as easy water. It was known by
Speaker 5: the ancients as living water. So this living water, because
Speaker 5: of the sound, creates exagonal molecules. These exagonal molecules creates
Speaker 5: surface contact in all sites, which means there is no
Speaker 5: space for impurities. So in terms of purifying water, you
Speaker 5: don't need anything more than sound itself. So let me
Speaker 5: just say this in terms of the salt water that
Speaker 5: you speak, it's very easy to explain because around from
Speaker 5: four thousand BC to thirty six hunderd BC, there is
Speaker 5: this event that cause the great flood in the Middle
Speaker 5: East that is called the Burkle Crater. So when this happened,
Speaker 5: and this is a multi impact site all over the world,
Speaker 5: but the known is the Burkele Crater. You have one
Speaker 5: and the Atlantic two in the Pacific and they all
Speaker 5: happen more or less in the same time frame. That
Speaker 5: caused multiple floods all around the world. It cause months
Speaker 5: of rain, It caused weeks of boiling rain at first,
Speaker 5: and then cold rain after that caused all these events.
Speaker 5: So that salt water is why you find the clamshells,
Speaker 5: not only only on the three first levels of the
Speaker 5: casing stones, as you find those clams and those fossils
Speaker 5: that are relatively modern compared to what we're supposed to
Speaker 5: found inside the pyramids itself. So I'm not saying you're wrong.
Speaker 5: I'm saying that there is very good scientific data that
Speaker 5: can explain all of those factors that you are described.
Speaker 8: So I agree, and I understand about the cimatics, and
Speaker 8: I'll talk about cimatics as well to help create easy
Speaker 8: water also, just to add on to that, and something
Speaker 8: that I want to talk about a little later is
Speaker 8: that infrared is also capable of structuring water crystalline structure
Speaker 8: of water, and I believe in the Kaffer Pyramid both
Speaker 8: of these principles are.
Speaker 2: Being applied as well.
Speaker 8: Now I do know I have heard about maybe what
Speaker 8: you were alluding to is that there's a large discussion
Speaker 8: about how the pyramids might be tuned to the frequency
Speaker 8: of the Earth.
Speaker 2: I don't want to bring it up right now.
Speaker 8: But what I'm going to be discussing a little bit
Speaker 8: later is that, in my opinion, the pyramids are trying
Speaker 8: to dampen all energetic noise, and they do that in
Speaker 8: a variety of ways. I want to set up saltwater
Speaker 8: electrolysis first, and then the next thing I'll talk about
Speaker 8: is the various elements that we know about that create
Speaker 8: a dampening effect for energetic noise in various aspects. So
Speaker 8: I do, and I also do agree that cymatics is
Speaker 8: a good way of removing pollution from water, and this
Speaker 8: has been demonstrated. And infrared can also influence the crystalline
Speaker 8: structure of water, and it has also been demonstrated as
Speaker 8: a way of removing pollution from water, and some tangential
Speaker 8: evidence scientific evidence. It is well understood and heavily published
Speaker 8: that infrared light therapy on the human body generates health
Speaker 8: benefits of various kinds. And the human body is also
Speaker 8: overwhelmingly composed of water. And one more feature of easy
Speaker 8: water that is I think also significant that is relevant
Speaker 8: to the Coffer pyramids is that if you.
Speaker 2: Create if you create a crystalline.
Speaker 8: Structure for water where the bonds of hydrogen are close
Speaker 8: together and the oxygen and hydrogen are on opposite sides,
Speaker 8: you can create a diepole in easy water as well.
Speaker 8: And so this is significant because it can create a
Speaker 8: direction and it allows water to have both a positive
Speaker 8: and a negative end. And this is why it's very
Speaker 8: difficult right now with given information or known information, in
Speaker 8: my opinion, it's difficult to solve right now exactly what
Speaker 8: the boxes are doing. But I think it's sufficient enough
Speaker 8: to say right now that these boxes all around the
Speaker 8: world are part of an electrical system. And I think
Speaker 8: that when we're building the foundation for understanding what these are,
Speaker 8: I want to start with the base primitives. And the
Speaker 8: first step that is not well accepted is the idea
Speaker 8: that electricity exists anywhere in these structures. And so before
Speaker 8: we get too deep into theory, just want to make
Speaker 8: sure that we hit all the primitives. And again more
Speaker 8: evidence of why we know that they're under that these
Speaker 8: civilizations understood electricity, or at least understood magnetism. It's because
Speaker 8: of how they positioned these megalithic structures on polar north
Speaker 8: and south perfectly over and over and over again, demonstrating
Speaker 8: again that they understood this principle.
Speaker 2: So, in my opinion, where.
Speaker 8: The electric current actually starts to play a role is
Speaker 8: in the Queen's Chamber, in the subterranean chamber. I'm a
Speaker 8: mathematical person, and so to me it is order of
Speaker 8: operations matters a lot, and it is significant to me
Speaker 8: that things happen in a sequence and not all at once.
Speaker 8: And so I think that there is a functional reason
Speaker 8: for a step by step process. And I will also
Speaker 8: show a little bit more evidence when I get to
Speaker 8: the Grand Chamber of a step by step process where
Speaker 8: order of operations matters, and that this sequence is part
Speaker 8: of the function functional purpose of the pyramids. So what
Speaker 8: we know in the Queen's Chamber is that there's salt
Speaker 8: deposits all over here as well.
Speaker 2: And the argument that I want to make is.
Speaker 8: That this is where electrolysis on the salt water begins,
Speaker 8: and that this is where the reactions will begin. And
Speaker 8: some hard evidence that we found is that they have
Speaker 8: Chris Christopher Dun's team has already found hydrochloric acid in
Speaker 8: one of these shafts.
Speaker 2: I think it's a south shaft over here.
Speaker 5: Now, hydrochlora edit could have been added to increase the
Speaker 5: efficiency of the system too.
Speaker 2: You mean, like they were pouring hydrochloric acid.
Speaker 5: Down at certain points, they could if they didn't understand
Speaker 5: the technology, they could start adding that to increase the output.
Speaker 5: According to your theory, because other product classic would increase
Speaker 5: the efficiency of the system.
Speaker 8: So one of the other things that's also being created
Speaker 8: is the sodium hydroxide. And if you allow this reaction
Speaker 8: to continue, my understanding is that the hydrochloric acid portion
Speaker 8: of salt water electrolysis is not the favored.
Speaker 2: Reaction.
Speaker 8: It is a it is a side by product, but
Speaker 8: it is the minority product. Or it is a low
Speaker 8: yield product on average.
Speaker 5: Now, so you can't think it would be enough by
Speaker 5: natural means only to find the quantities that Christmas don't
Speaker 5: found there.
Speaker 8: So he didn't find massive quantities. He found residue and
Speaker 8: the yield my understanding, at ambient temperature and pressure, the
Speaker 8: yield of hydrochloric acid on salt water electrolysis will be
Speaker 8: in the range of ten to twenty percent, assuming nothing else.
Speaker 2: So that's pure salt water.
Speaker 8: It doesn't mean if there's other In fact, if there
Speaker 8: are other things in the salt water, like seawater, for example,
Speaker 8: if there's magnesium and I think they've found zinc, this
Speaker 8: might actually negatively impact the yield of hydrochloric acid. However,
Speaker 8: what I'm trying to get at here is that hydrochloric acid,
Speaker 8: if we're looking at these as a chemical reaction chamber,
Speaker 8: there aren't too many ways. There are some ways, but
Speaker 8: there aren't too many ways to just create hydrochloric acid
Speaker 8: out of Like a solution, you have to put a
Speaker 8: lot of effort into creating it, and saltwater octrolysis is
Speaker 8: among the simplest ways to create a low yield, admittedly
Speaker 8: a low yield, there will be a way higher yield
Speaker 8: of sodium hydroxide that is created. But what is also
Speaker 8: interesting is that hydrochloric acid is highly acidic, and sodium
Speaker 8: hydroxide is basic, but slightly basic. It's not the same
Speaker 8: extreme degree, the same degree of extreme acidity that hydrochloric
Speaker 8: acid is. Sodium hydroxide is less extreme in its basic nature,
Speaker 8: and so part of the argument I'm making here is
Speaker 8: that this is multifunctional, and we're going to see as
Speaker 8: we keep going through this multiple methods of filtering water.
Speaker 8: And one thing that's happening here is by combining hydrochloric
Speaker 8: acid and sodium hydroxide without a membrane layer in between,
Speaker 8: means that these two things come together and this helps.
Speaker 2: pH balance the water.
Speaker 8: Whenever you want to create a splitting mechanism where hydrochloric
Speaker 8: acid is only found on one side but maybe not
Speaker 8: on the other, this kind of without a membrane in
Speaker 8: between that is known or visible, this indicates that there
Speaker 8: is some so of charge that like a battery. If
Speaker 8: you convention the convention, maybe I should have described conventional wisdom.
Speaker 8: So conventional wisdom in saltwater electrolysis is that there is
Speaker 8: an anode and a cathode side, and the chlorine will
Speaker 8: be attracted to the anode side, the positively charged side,
Speaker 8: and the hydrogen the positively charged hydrogen that had a
Speaker 8: electron sip stripped off of it, and the sodium would
Speaker 8: be attracted to the cathode side, the negatively charged side.
Speaker 8: And so what's interesting is that Christopher Dunn's team found
Speaker 8: hydrochloric acid only on one side Now, if hydrogen doesn't
Speaker 8: have the electrons split off of it.
Speaker 2: It'll mert.
Speaker 8: It'll combine with other free floating hydrogen and create hydrogen
Speaker 8: gas H two, and then this won't have it a charge,
Speaker 8: and it can go in both of the shafts. So
Speaker 8: I'm thinking about the queen Chamber shafts as being test tubes,
Speaker 8: and that's because saltwater electrolysis will.
Speaker 2: Create a lot of pressure.
Speaker 8: When you're creating hydrogen and chlorine gas, this is going
Speaker 8: to create a huge amount of pressure in the headspace,
Speaker 8: and so that pressure and that gas needs somewhere to
Speaker 8: go otherwise you're gonna eventually explode the system. And so
Speaker 8: if you allow this reaction to continue slowly for a
Speaker 8: longer period of time, hydrogen gas along with chlorine gas
Speaker 8: is how you get these two to interact with each
Speaker 8: other and settle into hydrochloric acid. But this thing isn't
Speaker 8: going to happen that easily if they're also in the
Speaker 8: presence of other things, like it's a slurry of different
Speaker 8: elements like what I'm expecting to be in the Queen's chamber,
Speaker 8: especially when you have the water with all the residues
Speaker 8: and stuff in there, then you'll have a lot of
Speaker 8: other side reactions that are occurring, and this becomes chaotic.
Speaker 8: But if you can trap hydrogen gas and chlorine gas,
Speaker 8: which is the only gaseous elements that are created initially
Speaker 8: in the reaction, then you can trap that in the shafts.
Speaker 8: And so where I was going with this was that
Speaker 8: the water level on the outside doesn't need to be
Speaker 8: very high. It only needs to be up to the
Speaker 8: height of the queen's chamber. And that's actually a good
Speaker 8: thing because then that allows you to look at these
Speaker 8: shafts as being inverted test tubes, and then this will
Speaker 8: allow the gas to float in and trap into a
Speaker 8: very confined space. This is very small space over here,
Speaker 8: and this will allow with pressure build up, the hydrogen
Speaker 8: gas and the chlorine gas to react with each other,
Speaker 8: because you don't want to have chlorine gas will become
Speaker 8: really caustic if it sticks around for too long. And
Speaker 8: so another thing that happens is that this can also
Speaker 8: this reaction can recirculate back into sodium chloride. So if
Speaker 8: you have the sodium hydroxide still present in the in
Speaker 8: the queen's chamber, which that would be in uh particular matter, form.
Speaker 8: It would be solid form, so that wouldn't be a
Speaker 8: gas that would be going up in the shaft. So
Speaker 8: one of the things I was hoping is maybe we
Speaker 8: can see if there's any sodium hydroxide anywhere around these
Speaker 8: these places. Uh, then uh, you would be able to
Speaker 8: have the hydrochloric acid come back and you know, fall
Speaker 8: into come back as liquid fall into the liquid solution
Speaker 8: pH balance get you know, get interaction with the sodium hydroxide,
Speaker 8: and then the hydrochloric acid and the sodiumhydroxide they can
Speaker 8: reform again and you can create salt all over again.
Speaker 8: So in other words, this process can go forward and backwards.
Speaker 5: So what you're saying is that the two shafts are
Speaker 5: condensation tubes.
Speaker 8: Yes, that's a great way to think about it. Yeah,
Speaker 8: that's how I'm thinking about it. So one of the other, uh,
Speaker 8: one of the other unexplained things is why did they the.
Speaker 2: People who engineered this.
Speaker 8: There's not a good explanation yet for why they changed
Speaker 8: the construction of the King's Chamber and the shafts to
Speaker 8: rose granite. And they made that change explicitly. And if
Speaker 8: I want to introduce a couple a couple of concepts
Speaker 8: with this. So another thing that Christopher Dunnan's team has
Speaker 8: done is he's looked at the cutting rate that you
Speaker 8: can do into hard granite with a copper saw and
Speaker 8: then compared that to a diamond.
Speaker 2: Tip machine saw.
Speaker 8: And your best case scenario with the copper saw cutting
Speaker 8: into granite is you can go at a rate of
Speaker 8: about three millimeters per hour constantly cutting, and with a
Speaker 8: modern day diamond tip machine saw that rate increases to
Speaker 8: about thirty millimeters per hour. So if you look at
Speaker 8: these boxes at the serapium which I have here somewhere
Speaker 8: here we go, these boxes are enormous and again way
Speaker 8: incorrectly size to be a tomb. So one of these cuts,
Speaker 8: look at how deep of a cut you would have
Speaker 8: to make and how long of a cut you would
Speaker 8: have to make. If I'm going to round to fifteen feet.
Speaker 8: I know it's a little bit less than fifteen feet,
Speaker 8: but just say fifteen feet for the easy math. It
Speaker 8: would take with a diamond tip machine saw just to
Speaker 8: make one cut and it says nothing about depth, just
Speaker 8: one cut of that length that would take six more
Speaker 8: than six days with a diamond tip machine cut saw,
Speaker 8: go a non stop just to make the one cut
Speaker 8: across this box. So if a copper saw is going
Speaker 8: at three millimeters, which is ten times longer, then cutting
Speaker 8: one side would take more than sixty days.
Speaker 2: And that's just one side. Now you also have to
Speaker 2: cut the ends.
Speaker 8: You have to cut all the sides, and then you
Speaker 8: have to cut the lid, and then the lid also
Speaker 8: has shaping, and now you have to cut each of
Speaker 8: these shapes. And that says nothing about the amount of
Speaker 8: copper you're going to be shaving off of the copper saw,
Speaker 8: because copper is softer than granite.
Speaker 2: And so this process just to cut one.
Speaker 8: Side, make one cut, not even saying anything about death,
Speaker 8: that would take more than sixty days with the copper
Speaker 8: saw NonStop, twenty four to seven. And that also doesn't
Speaker 8: say anything about the polishing on it. These granite boxes
Speaker 8: are mirror finished, they're polished heavily, and on top of that,
Speaker 8: you have to be able to scoop out somehow the
Speaker 8: inside and the precision on the interior of these boxes
Speaker 8: is all so extreme, and that also would add just
Speaker 8: an astronomical amount of time. So where what I'm getting
Speaker 8: at is every single time you add even one granite
Speaker 8: block to the construction of any of these megalithic structures
Speaker 8: or these pyramids. You're increasing the labor time astronomically. And
Speaker 8: so what is happening in this king's chamber is this
Speaker 8: whole king's chamber and all of these shafts are made
Speaker 8: of many granite blocks. And by the way, at the
Speaker 8: Serapim they have twenty four of those granite boxes. Just
Speaker 8: imagine how long it would take with a conference out
Speaker 8: to cut one of them, let alone twenty four of them.
Speaker 8: And that's just in one place in Egypt. That's just
Speaker 8: one thing. And then they're doing it again and again,
Speaker 8: and then they.
Speaker 5: Have all they don't fit on the front door.
Speaker 8: And exactly and that's the other problem is that they
Speaker 8: don't fit. There's no passage way that would allow you
Speaker 8: to insert those granite blocks or those granite boxes after
Speaker 8: the fact. They would have to make them first and
Speaker 8: then construct the buildings around them because there's no way
Speaker 8: to transport them. Yeah, so the granite in here, that's
Speaker 8: an expensive choice, that is an extreme high labor cost,
Speaker 8: a labor intense choice. And there are also examples of mistakes.
Speaker 8: Even in the Egypt Museum, they show one of the
Speaker 8: granite boxes that was a mistake where they made an
Speaker 8: incorrect cut and they just had to abandon it. So
Speaker 8: if you make a mistake, that's like a year of
Speaker 8: your life just gone where you had to cut twenty
Speaker 8: four to seven NonStop. So, and there are plenty of
Speaker 8: examples of them making cuts that were mistakes too. So
Speaker 8: each of those is an enormous labor expense, an enormous
Speaker 8: amount of time. Astronomical amounts of time get added every
Speaker 8: time you add granite. So what is the functional purpose
Speaker 8: of granite? And now here's an argument that is hard
Speaker 8: to currently support, but it's something that I'm trying to
Speaker 8: work with. So in my opinion, the reason why you
Speaker 8: would want to have red rose granite in this area
Speaker 8: is because you want to treat the water with infrared.
Speaker 8: And there are two methods of getting infrared light into
Speaker 8: these chambers. So, first of all, something to know is
Speaker 8: that infrared light in the near red spectrum. There are
Speaker 8: certain wavelengths that are capable of penetrating through limestone. But
Speaker 8: this rose red deep red rose granite would reflect infrared light.
Speaker 8: And so if you just kind of go with this
Speaker 8: journey with me for a minute, here, if you had
Speaker 8: a source of infrared light that was able to focus
Speaker 8: itself into this shaft even with the plugstones. Infrared like
Speaker 8: could penetrate even the plugstones. It could be reflected all
Speaker 8: the way down into the shaft and treat the water
Speaker 8: through here.
Speaker 2: There's also a second method.
Speaker 8: Of generating infrared light, and this is also something that
Speaker 8: Christopher Dunn talked about. There's a ted talk about how
Speaker 8: a scientist was looking at geology and notice that there
Speaker 8: was infrared light or thermal imaging was showing that before
Speaker 8: an earthquake. A few days before an earthquake, they would
Speaker 8: see on thermal imaging they would see granite that would
Speaker 8: generate infrared light before an earthquake happened. And what they've
Speaker 8: found is that if you apply mechanical stress to red
Speaker 8: rose banit.
Speaker 2: They actually looked at specifically rose granite.
Speaker 8: If you apply mechanical stress to this granite, you can
Speaker 8: push out electrons from this mechanical stress and you can
Speaker 8: also generate infrared light. And when earthquakes happened, before the
Speaker 8: earthquakes happen, if there's rock like granite in the area
Speaker 8: before then the mechanical stress will then show this on
Speaker 8: thermal imaging, and they've successfully done this many times now.
Speaker 8: They've successfully been able to predict earthquakes a few days
Speaker 8: in advance just by looking at thermal imaging.
Speaker 5: So that's exactly why they chose fault lines, because that's
Speaker 5: those small earthquakes cause an amplify the Pizo electric effect.
Speaker 5: And exact when they put rose granite in a hydraulic
Speaker 5: press and they shut down the lights, you can actually
Speaker 5: see the granite, the crystal matrix within the rose granite
Speaker 5: to light up and produce lights.
Speaker 2: Yes, perfect, Yeah, exactly.
Speaker 8: I'm gonna get a little bit into the earthquake thing
Speaker 8: a little bit later when I talk about the SAR scans,
Speaker 8: but I want to get away from the idea of
Speaker 8: the earthquakes being part of the mechanical stress that is
Speaker 8: generating the Pato electric effect.
Speaker 2: Again, I think that they are generally amplifying.
Speaker 8: Yeah, I'm going to make the argument that these pyramid
Speaker 8: structures are dampening. So actually now is a good time
Speaker 8: to kind of talk about that. So I think what
Speaker 8: the one of the critical features that is demonstrated in
Speaker 8: various ways in the confra pyramid is that these are
Speaker 8: trying to eliminate energetic noise from all sources. So one
Speaker 8: aspect of this is the exterior of the pyramids. They
Speaker 8: were encased in white limestone, and the white limestone is
Speaker 8: a great way to reflect all visible light and also
Speaker 8: will reflect UV.
Speaker 2: Light as well.
Speaker 8: The reason why they change from white life limestone to
Speaker 8: regular limestone on the inside is because limestone is a
Speaker 8: little bit more of a porous structure, and having a
Speaker 8: porous structure generates two major advantages. Number one, this is
Speaker 8: a great way to dampen sound, and so you'll be
Speaker 8: able to capture sound in these little porous structures. And
Speaker 8: number two, if you're running water through the system, wherever
Speaker 8: water comes in contact with limestone, the limestone will become hydrolyzed.
Speaker 8: And now normally inert limestone is just inert. But once
Speaker 8: you hydrolyze limestone, so all you have to do is
Speaker 8: run water through it, then that makes the conductive properties
Speaker 8: of limestone significantly better. I'm not going to call it
Speaker 8: a conductor. It's not going to be anywhere near copper
Speaker 8: or anything like that, but it does significantly improve the
Speaker 8: conductive ability of limestone.
Speaker 2: And so why why is that useful?
Speaker 8: So if we're talking about the pho electric effect, and
Speaker 8: the whole pyramid is filled with this quartz sand. So
Speaker 8: another way of just kind of in your head, the
Speaker 8: way you can think about it is you can think
Speaker 8: about thet the pyramids is being filled with static electricity,
Speaker 8: and the newer scans show the void above the grand chamber.
Speaker 8: In my opinion, this void is also going to be
Speaker 8: filled with quart sand. And the whole point of this
Speaker 8: is to have a lot of charge that is diffused
Speaker 8: throughout the pyramid and then where wherever limestone comes in
Speaker 8: contact with water, this portion will be more conductive and
Speaker 8: it'll generate vectors for the electric charge to travel.
Speaker 2: So there needs to be.
Speaker 8: A way to draw all that pezzo electric effect out
Speaker 8: of the sand and have it directionally travel to where
Speaker 8: you want it. In my opinion, this is all done
Speaker 8: with water. And on top of that, we've already discussed
Speaker 8: easy water and you can create a diepole based off
Speaker 8: of this, and so if you tune it to the
Speaker 8: right frequencies or treat it with infrared or both.
Speaker 2: And what we also noticed that they have these.
Speaker 8: Triangle like structures on the roofing of these chambers, So
Speaker 8: what is the advantage of doing this? So what I
Speaker 8: believe is that this is also a heavily pressurized system,
Speaker 8: and the point of having this roof like structure here
Speaker 8: is to generate more surface area and concentrate the weight
Speaker 8: down into these pointed areas, both this king, this portion
Speaker 8: of the King's chamber, and this portion of the Queen's chamber.
Speaker 8: So again, if you have saltwater electrolysis, you're creating hydrogen
Speaker 8: gas highly explosive, and you're generating chlorine gas. If you
Speaker 8: put this system under high pressure and high temperature, there
Speaker 8: are a number of other side reactions that happen, but
Speaker 8: one of the side reactions that gets favored under high
Speaker 8: pressure and high temperature is it leans more towards oxygen,
Speaker 8: creating oxygen as well, and so two will also be
Speaker 8: generated here. So it makes sense to me why they
Speaker 8: had to build these structures inside deep, inside really heavy pyramids,
Speaker 8: because this is going to be in a highly explode
Speaker 8: This could generate really big explosions because you're gonna this
Speaker 8: is gonna be a highly explosive gaseous area where you're
Speaker 8: gonna have hydrogen gas and oxygen gas being created here.
Speaker 8: And if the and we have signs, we have multiple
Speaker 8: signs of a massive explosion occurring both in the Queen's
Speaker 8: chamber and Christopher's Dun's team Christopher Dun's team has measured
Speaker 8: the granite and the creek King's chamber, and it shows
Speaker 8: signs of mechanical stress pushing out from the King's Chamber,
Speaker 8: indicating a big explosion happened there as well.
Speaker 5: So the preed stone at the corner, I'm sorry, you
Speaker 5: have the cracked stone at the corner.
Speaker 2: And you have the crack stout. Yeah.
Speaker 8: And then also the boxes look like they're charcoal brick,
Speaker 8: and we know that those are probably were originally granite broxes,
Speaker 8: just like we see everywhere else in Egypt. So you've
Speaker 8: got to really think what kinds of temperatures were being
Speaker 8: achieved in order to make something like that happen. One
Speaker 8: of the other things to note is that granite is
Speaker 8: also a really good thermal. It absorbs the heat really well,
Speaker 8: and so grant and granted also is known to deform
Speaker 8: under high heat. But one of the interesting characteristics of
Speaker 8: granite is that when you cool it back down, it
Speaker 8: returns to its original structure, it's original form. And so
Speaker 8: what's interesting about the explosion that Christopher Dunn's team found
Speaker 8: King in the King's chamber. It's one thing if you
Speaker 8: saw an explosion and the heat heated granite from that
Speaker 8: explosion expanded outward, but you would have expected that to return.
Speaker 2: The fact that there.
Speaker 8: Is still some deformation as a result, actually to me
Speaker 8: indicates the high energy level that had occurred in order
Speaker 8: to achieve an explosion of that size, because once this
Speaker 8: chamber had cooled down, the granite should have returned to
Speaker 8: its normal structure. This is what's classically understood when you
Speaker 8: put granite under high heat. So this is where it
Speaker 8: gets really interesting. So the next thing I want to
Speaker 8: show is kind of just a quick little diagram that
Speaker 8: basically describes what I'm talking about. How you could have
Speaker 8: a gravity fed system. This is called a Farrow's pump,
Speaker 8: but that includes this compressed air section up here, which
Speaker 8: I'm not including in my description, but basically you can
Speaker 8: see how a gravity fed system would fill this up
Speaker 8: and then you would have additional space here that I'll
Speaker 8: talk about in the Grand chamber. But this is basically
Speaker 8: the concept that we're going for here. So what happens
Speaker 8: when you have saltwater electrolysis generating hydrogen gas and oxygen.
Speaker 8: The hydrogen gas and the oxygen in gases form, we'll
Speaker 8: be able to travel up into the Grand Chamber. And
Speaker 8: now maybe what they did was they filled this whole
Speaker 8: thing up with water, and then they are using the
Speaker 8: gases to bubble through the Grand Chamber, and then the
Speaker 8: hydrogen gas would be towards the top, oxygen gas would
Speaker 8: a little bit towards the middle bottom, and then you
Speaker 8: would have maybe reformed water at the very bottom. This
Speaker 8: is where I want to bring in those structures that
Speaker 8: I was talking about from the Arizona Builtmore hotel. So
Speaker 8: this is also Christopher Dunn's work.
Speaker 2: Let me figure out where I put it.
Speaker 8: So he talks about these helm I can never say
Speaker 8: this word right, Helmholtz resonators. So again we have I
Speaker 8: think it's well understood. Probably everyone here knows that the
Speaker 8: Grand Chamber is acoustically tuned.
Speaker 2: So is the King's Chamber. But let's focus on the
Speaker 2: Grand Chamber for now.
Speaker 5: Now.
Speaker 8: One thing about the Grand Chamber is that it is
Speaker 8: not acoustically tuned to the same frequency everywhere in it.
Speaker 8: It has a step up mechanism. So this is where
Speaker 8: I'm talking about order of operations. It starts at the
Speaker 8: lower end, and there's a lower frequency that it's tuned
Speaker 8: to at the bottom end, and then as you get
Speaker 8: towards the top, then.
Speaker 2: It goes to a higher frequency.
Speaker 8: And I believe the current estimates and the current readings
Speaker 8: that they've got for the highest frequency achieved there, it's
Speaker 8: tuned to around four hundred and thirty two herts or
Speaker 8: four hundred and forty herts, depending on who you want
Speaker 8: to listen to. I think Christopher Dune, his personal experiment
Speaker 8: that he did himself, saw four hundred and forty herts
Speaker 8: was the tuning frequency. So this is where I want
Speaker 8: to incorporate what I was seeing at the Arizona Builtmore hotel.
Speaker 8: These resonators appear to be a step up function. And
Speaker 8: we were discussing cymatics earlier. So before you if you're
Speaker 8: trying to do high energy physics, which is where I'm
Speaker 8: trying to get to, then what you want to do
Speaker 8: is you want to save the step that does simatics
Speaker 8: for the treated water first. In my opinion, there are
Speaker 8: easier ways to treat water, not just with cymatics, although
Speaker 8: I know that that can happen, but I think the
Speaker 8: real physical advantage the actual advantage that cymatics has is
Speaker 8: that it structures water in a specific orientation and more specifically,
Speaker 8: depending on which frequency that you use, you can angle
Speaker 8: the hydrogen bonds on water very specifically. And to give
Speaker 8: a real life kind of analogy for this, the reason
Speaker 8: why snowflakes get their crystalline structure is discussed in cymatics.
Speaker 8: Sound waves adjust these bonds. The angle of these bonds.
Speaker 8: It's still H two O the same as you know.
Speaker 8: It's all that's changing is the angle of these bonds.
Speaker 8: So what I'm trying to get at here is that
Speaker 8: because you're the purpose of cymatics in the in my opinion,
Speaker 8: for the Coffer pyramid, is about angling these bonds to
Speaker 8: structure water exactly the right way, and you're creating a
Speaker 8: step up function. So in other words, you're being gentle
Speaker 8: about it. Your hydrogen your water will start at the
Speaker 8: lower frequency. This will begin to adjust slowly and organize
Speaker 8: the hydrogen bonds into a specific angle, and then as
Speaker 8: it increases, or as it goes up the grand chamber,
Speaker 8: it will gradually increase the frequency, increasing the energy that
Speaker 8: is being put into the H two molecule.
Speaker 5: Now this grand gallery as flooded.
Speaker 8: So in my opinion, it can be, but I do
Speaker 8: not believe that that's actually what is happening. No, in
Speaker 8: my opinion, what is actually happening is the chamber is
Speaker 8: mostly filling with hydrogen and oxygen. But the issue is
Speaker 8: that if they're not all extremely high energy, if the
Speaker 8: hydrogen is not at a very high energy band, then
Speaker 8: what will end up happening is it's not stable and
Speaker 8: it'll combine with oxygen and create water.
Speaker 5: And so how do you correlate that with the Portocolli
Speaker 5: is the three doors that you can regulate up and
Speaker 5: down to regulate the frequency.
Speaker 8: So, in my opinion, what is happening is to help
Speaker 8: maintain hydrogen gas.
Speaker 2: This is actually where I was going.
Speaker 8: So I'm taking the principle that is well understood in
Speaker 8: water simatics is well understood. I'm taking the same principle
Speaker 8: and I'm about to apply it to hydrogen gas. So,
Speaker 8: in my opinion, the actual purpose of this Grand Chamber
Speaker 8: is mostly for hydrogen gas and what they're trying to do.
Speaker 8: While yes, we do understand that you can tune water
Speaker 8: and you will be able to get these frequencies and
Speaker 8: do all that you can do the same thing with
Speaker 8: just the hydrogen gas itself. And another way to understand
Speaker 8: this terminology of tuning hydrogen gas to a certain frequency.
Speaker 8: Another way of interpreting this is it is controlling the spin.
Speaker 8: And this is really when I'm going to get into
Speaker 8: some high energy physics. This is where I'm trying to go.
Speaker 8: Is that what is We're talking about a massive amount
Speaker 8: of hydrogen and it's in context with oxygen, and it's
Speaker 8: in a highly pressurized system.
Speaker 2: This is highly explosive.
Speaker 8: If this is not done in a controlled way, slow
Speaker 8: and under tight controls, then this becomes highly explosive and
Speaker 8: dangerous rapidly. And in this picture, this is Christopher Dunn's picture,
Speaker 8: he's also showing scorch marks all across the top of
Speaker 8: the Grand Chamber, so there's a lot and of course
Speaker 8: we have soot and all this stuff, so we know
Speaker 8: explosions happened all over here.
Speaker 2: So what we're.
Speaker 8: Doing with simatics in the Grand Chamber is, in my opinion,
Speaker 8: we're trying to achieve a high We're trying to maintain
Speaker 8: a high frequency for hydrogen gas. We're trying to keep
Speaker 8: hydrogen gas in an elevated energy state. And so this
Speaker 8: is a step by step process because we need to
Speaker 8: control it.
Speaker 2: If it goes.
Speaker 8: Uncontrolled or in chaos or in large bulk rapidly, then
Speaker 8: this is an uncontrolled high energy physics reaction. And we're
Speaker 8: talking about like the nuclear bombs and shit, or hydrogen bombs.
Speaker 8: What we're trying to do is control this. So the
Speaker 8: idea is to be slow about it. And this is
Speaker 8: where things get even more interesting.
Speaker 9: So the there there is a way for hydrogen and
Speaker 9: oxygen to recombine if it falls to a lower energy state,
Speaker 9: and all that'll do is create water.
Speaker 8: But what is what is commonly understood is this there
Speaker 8: there's this exit here that goes into the King's chamber.
Speaker 8: But what is less commonly known is that there is
Speaker 8: another hole other portal out here at the top of
Speaker 8: the Grand Chamber. So that is really what I want
Speaker 8: to get into because this is where the porcolis. Yeah yeah, yeah,
Speaker 8: So there's a few unusual things. Let me just address
Speaker 8: the conventional narrative and talk about why that doesn't make sense.
Speaker 8: So the conventional narrative is that this is the King's
Speaker 8: chamber is a tomb, and that these blocks here were
Speaker 8: put there as doors or like blocks passageways so that
Speaker 8: people couldn't go in there and steal whatever was in
Speaker 8: the tomb. Well, if that was true, then why is
Speaker 8: there a giant cavity right over the stones? Why would
Speaker 8: like putting the stones there just defeated its own purpose
Speaker 8: because you could just climb right over it and it's
Speaker 8: not even that hard to do.
Speaker 2: They like, these aren't huge stones.
Speaker 8: They're I mean, they're really heavy, but they're not like
Speaker 8: impossible to climb over.
Speaker 2: So and there's this huge void up here, you.
Speaker 5: Have signs of rope and police to manegrate them.
Speaker 8: Yeah, exactly. Yeah, So there's even signs of a system.
Speaker 8: And there's even a fourth smaller stone, like an anchor
Speaker 8: block that would make sense if it was elevated high
Speaker 8: up in the air, and there's room for it right here.
Speaker 8: And there's these three spools. There's like signs that there
Speaker 8: was three spools here, and you can imagine that these stones,
Speaker 8: these three stones were intended to move. In my opinion,
Speaker 8: the anti chamber is a regulating mechanism, similar to how
Speaker 8: this ascending passageway is also a pressure relief valve. And
Speaker 8: notice that they're on either end of this grand gallery.
Speaker 8: So there's these granite blocks that are in this ascending passage,
Speaker 8: if you put them right here, if there was a
Speaker 8: huge amount of pressure build up that went out of control,
Speaker 8: then these granite blocks could slide all the way down
Speaker 8: this ascending passage and they would block the water flow
Speaker 8: from the descending passage, and then this would prevent the
Speaker 8: reaction from continuing further. So this makes sense as a
Speaker 8: pressure relief valve on this end. So now let's talk
Speaker 8: about the anti chamber and how that's also a regulating mechanism.
Speaker 5: I'm a bit confused. So you just told me that
Speaker 5: there was you don't see water but hydrogen within the
Speaker 5: grand chamber, but then you speak about water again.
Speaker 8: Oh no, So again, hydrogen is what you're targeting in
Speaker 8: a grand chamber, and there's also oxygen gas because that's
Speaker 8: also another byproduct from saltwater electrolysis. So one of the
Speaker 8: issues is that not every single hydrogen atom is going
Speaker 8: to be in a high energy state and remain as
Speaker 8: hydrogen gas. Hydrogen gas and oxygen. When hydrogen falls to
Speaker 8: a lower energy state the two it's not stable and
Speaker 8: so this will recombine into water. So both of these
Speaker 8: things are happening at the same time, you're trying to
Speaker 8: achieve hydrogen that is controlled and at a high energy state,
Speaker 8: and that's the part that is collecting at the top
Speaker 8: of the chamber. But this is not a one hundred
Speaker 8: percent yield. In fact, I don't know the exact yield,
Speaker 8: but it won't be anywhere near one hundred percent.
Speaker 5: Yeah, But support call is then would be regulating a
Speaker 5: gas or a sound and not liquid because it wouldn't
Speaker 5: never be enough water to fill the Grand chamber in
Speaker 5: those situations.
Speaker 8: No, exactly, And that's not where I'm going with this.
Speaker 8: So hydrogen gas has multiple energy bands that it can
Speaker 8: be at. What I'm saying is that this lesser known pathway,
Speaker 8: where do I have it, This lesser known passage that
Speaker 8: is at the top of the Grand chamber. This is
Speaker 8: the passage where only specific hydrogen is being applied, meaning
Speaker 8: this is the hydrogen that is at the highest energetic state.
Speaker 8: This is the hydrogen that is most stable, and this
Speaker 8: is the hydrogen that is most pure, meaning it doesn't
Speaker 8: have other hydrogen gas at lower energy states. This hydrogen
Speaker 8: gas is the one that is at this hole, is
Speaker 8: at the very top.
Speaker 2: Of the Grand chamber.
Speaker 8: So the only hydrogen that would get up to that
Speaker 8: high of a level is the ones that all made
Speaker 8: it through the cimatics process by the Helmuth's resonators in
Speaker 8: the Grand chamber, made it from the.
Speaker 2: Bottom all the way to the top.
Speaker 8: Only that is what's going to be there, and that'll
Speaker 8: be under the highest pressure system. So what I'm saying
Speaker 8: is happening is that lower, the lower energy state molecules
Speaker 8: are the ones that are being passed into the anti chamber.
Speaker 8: So in here you can have both oxygen which will
Speaker 8: be heavier, and you can have hydrogen gas that's at
Speaker 8: lower energy states that didn't stay spun into a high
Speaker 8: energy state. So only what you're trying to do here
Speaker 8: is you're trying to collect only the hydrogen that spins correctly,
Speaker 8: spins at the correct frequency, and you're trying to create
Speaker 8: a chamber above the King's Chamber. In my opinion, only
Speaker 8: the highest energy state hydrogen gas is the one that's
Speaker 8: collecting up here. The lower energy hydrogen gas is going
Speaker 8: to collect, and oxygen gas is going to collect in here.
Speaker 8: And I think that what the purpose is is to
Speaker 8: create a second high pressure zone where if the pressure
Speaker 8: in this anti chamber builds to a sufficient degree, this
Speaker 8: anchor block will push down, and it's on a rope
Speaker 8: pulley system that we know about, and this pulley system
Speaker 8: will pull these blocks up. And then this will create
Speaker 8: a relief where the oxygen and hydrogen that didn't quite
Speaker 8: make it into the high energy state, which is what
Speaker 8: you're trying to isolate for in my opinion, the lower
Speaker 8: energy band hydrogen oxygen will have a place to vent to.
Speaker 2: And then what this allows is in the.
Speaker 8: King's Chamber and in these shafts you can vent hydrogen
Speaker 8: and oxygen, or if hydrogen and oxygen interact with each other,
Speaker 8: then they can also reform create water, and that's what
Speaker 8: would fill here, and so water would get Any reformed
Speaker 8: water would collect here and then pass down as liquid
Speaker 8: down the bottom of the Grand Chamber and then go
Speaker 8: right back into this clean chaper where it restarts the
Speaker 8: process again.
Speaker 5: So I'm getting so curious. I can I can't resist,
Speaker 5: and I'm not sure if Nick is going to show
Speaker 5: strip down the show or not. But I'm very closed
Speaker 5: to know what is the purpose of all of this.
Speaker 2: Okay, so this is where we got to go.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I do have to say I got about like
Speaker 3: ten minutes unfortunately, because I do have another show.
Speaker 2: So yeah, okay, I'm gonna I'll finish up here. This
Speaker 2: is the big reveal.
Speaker 8: So what I've been what I've been trying to demonstrate,
Speaker 8: is that there are a lot of acoustic there's acoustic
Speaker 8: tuning is a high pressure system. This is trying to
Speaker 8: purify water, and that this grand gallery has one known
Speaker 8: portal that goes towards this upper chamber in the King's Chamber,
Speaker 8: where this specific portal is where you get the tuned hydrogen. Now,
Speaker 8: think about what you have. Hydrogen is as close to
Speaker 8: a proton as you can get. If you strip the
Speaker 8: electron off of the hydrogen, then you have just a proton.
Speaker 8: And so what I'm suggesting, and I'm hoping a nuclear
Speaker 8: physicist somewhere will help me figure this out, is that
Speaker 8: if you put in a lot of effort into getting
Speaker 8: all the hydrogen to behave exactly the same way, slowly
Speaker 8: collect them into the King's Chamber, this upper portion of
Speaker 8: the King's Chamber, and they're all spinning the same way,
Speaker 8: all have the same energy state, are all in the
Speaker 8: same shape under high pressure. This is possibly one way
Speaker 8: of doing transmutation and you have to think about our
Speaker 8: current tech right now. The way that we have, the
Speaker 8: current method of generating high atomic weight elements beyond our
Speaker 8: periodic table is just taking elements, primitive elements, particles, spinning them.
Speaker 2: As close to the speed of light as we can possibly.
Speaker 8: Get, and then smashing them together and then maybe for
Speaker 8: a fraction of a fraction of a second you might
Speaker 8: have a high atomic weight element of some kind. But
Speaker 8: there's so much kinetic energy with this that there's no
Speaker 8: possible way you could have anything be stable that way.
Speaker 8: So what I'm proposing here is that this is a
Speaker 8: way to control, stabilize, and do this in a slow way.
Speaker 2: And a significant portion of.
Speaker 8: The stability of elements is their crystalline shape, their geometry,
Speaker 8: and this King's chamber is triangle shaped. So if you
Speaker 8: have pure hydrogen in a very high energy state, highly concentrated,
Speaker 8: all behaving the same way because of the acoustic tuning
Speaker 8: under high pressure in this specific zone at the top,
Speaker 8: you'll also be able to control.
Speaker 2: The shape of the of these hydrogen And if you.
Speaker 8: Can do that, then that's how you could generate a
Speaker 8: stable crystalline structure and possibly manufacture elements high atomic weight elements.
Speaker 5: Now, how do you remove those elements from there?
Speaker 2: Yeah, so that's a good question. I have no idea.
Speaker 8: But I also think that there's there's more to it
Speaker 8: than just that that we don't know about.
Speaker 5: Are any residues of those elements found on those places?
Speaker 8: We wouldn't know if it was explode if if there
Speaker 8: was massive explosions. So this reaction went unstable, and we
Speaker 8: see the signs of massive explosions all throughout, and so
Speaker 8: if this reaction went unstable and exploded, then there's no
Speaker 8: way we would find anything.
Speaker 5: What kind of elements do you think could be produced
Speaker 5: or would be more profitable? Since this is your series, so.
Speaker 2: You can create anything.
Speaker 8: So it could be something as simple as just creating
Speaker 8: basic elements that we already know about, but you could
Speaker 8: create potentially with under enough pressure and under enough energy
Speaker 8: and under enough stability, you could potentially create high atomic
Speaker 8: weight stuff. And all I'm trying to say here it
Speaker 8: can be anything in the spectrum because all I'm talking
Speaker 8: about is isolating protons. And the major advantage here is
Speaker 8: that you have a highly pressurized system that controls the
Speaker 8: shape and does this slowly and isolates high energy, specifically
Speaker 8: the high energy band hydrogen.
Speaker 5: So my final question for you is this, considering all
Speaker 5: you said, the investment, the time, the personnel, all there
Speaker 5: is required to build this, all the knowledge there is
Speaker 5: needed just to build a structure, let alone, what do
Speaker 5: you have describing? Uh? What what would be the significance
Speaker 5: of investing all of that to create elements?
Speaker 8: So I think that so in alchemy. So there's another
Speaker 8: thing that I'm afraid to talk about, but I'll talk
Speaker 8: about it since you're asking in the in alchemy. In
Speaker 8: the discussion about alchemy, there is in the hieroglyphs, in
Speaker 8: the stories of Egypt, there are a lot of accounts
Speaker 8: of this salamander description.
Speaker 2: Are you familiar with this?
Speaker 5: Yeah? And so in alchemy, alchemylic in alchemy.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 8: So another name for what this salamander is supposed to
Speaker 8: represent is salt water, sorry, not saltwater. Milk water is
Speaker 8: another name that they give this. Another name that they
Speaker 8: give this is mana or mana. And in my opinion,
Speaker 8: what they're trying to create here is one of the
Speaker 8: things that they could create that wouldn't be too difficult
Speaker 8: would be deuterium heavy water H three to zero, so
Speaker 8: stabilized form of deuterium, maybe even a highly energetic form
Speaker 8: of triterium. If if we want to take another leap
Speaker 8: and say that they understand radiation like highly radioactive substances.
Speaker 8: But let's just start with the primitives building up water
Speaker 8: to deuterium to maybe tritium, which might make sense with
Speaker 8: such a high energy system.
Speaker 2: So I think that's probably where they were going with
Speaker 2: it for purpose.
Speaker 8: So in my opinion, the stories that they tell in Egypt,
Speaker 8: they have this ank that you see.
Speaker 2: All the time.
Speaker 8: So in my opinion, what is inside the container is
Speaker 8: deuterium heavy water along with probably two electrodes. But this
Speaker 8: is what I think they were going for as they
Speaker 8: were trying to create deuterium overall as a mass manufactured.
Speaker 5: Yeah, but it has to be something more than just
Speaker 5: creating a staff that has some special properties.
Speaker 2: So I want to.
Speaker 8: Make sure that like my high energy physics stuff like
Speaker 8: that's second half and beyond primitives, I want to establish
Speaker 8: just that the primary function, the initial function, is to
Speaker 8: filter water. And I also believe that this filtered water
Speaker 8: is being used in other reactions in other pyramids, for
Speaker 8: example the Southern pyramid for ammonium. So I think the
Speaker 8: initial and primary and the biggest use for this whole
Speaker 8: thing is water filtration first and foremost. Then they stacked
Speaker 8: on additional features beyond that. And by the way, I
Speaker 8: think they added.
Speaker 2: More features than just the ones that I'm describing that here.
Speaker 5: Do you have any idea what that purified water will serve?
Speaker 5: What purpose?
Speaker 8: Clean water is great for reactions like if you need
Speaker 8: to create another reaction, but also just drinking water. And
Speaker 8: I mentioned before that there's a lot of well understood
Speaker 8: and published research around infrared light therapy being helpful for
Speaker 8: humans and their health.
Speaker 2: I think the same thing is true for drinking water.
Speaker 8: I think that there is an advantage to drinking water
Speaker 8: that is structured in a certain way.
Speaker 5: Yes, no doubt about it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so h.
Speaker 8: Two oh, the same as you know. I'm not talking
Speaker 8: about pollutants or whatever else. But I think that there
Speaker 8: is a unique advantage to having water with hydrogen bonds
Speaker 8: that are whether it's crystalline structure, structured in a specific way,
Speaker 8: and that this is better for your health than just
Speaker 8: drinking any normal water. And I think that that is
Speaker 8: the imagery that we're getting is there's this experiment that
Speaker 8: was done with water. If we still have time I
Speaker 8: know we're running out. There was an experiment that was
Speaker 8: done where they had three jars of water that was polluted.
Speaker 8: There was one jar where someone said nice things, complimentary
Speaker 8: things to the water, one where they did nothing.
Speaker 2: It was a control. And then.
Speaker 5: I'm sorry, Masa Moto is the man that did the experiment.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, exactly, thank you for giving me the name.
Speaker 8: Yeah, and they found that the one where you spoke
Speaker 8: nice to this is what cleaned the water, and the
Speaker 8: one that you didn't, that you said all kinds of
Speaker 8: hateful things to that one was dark and grimy and horrible,
Speaker 8: even worse than the control. And so I think that
Speaker 8: that is probably an advanced understanding that an advanced civilization
Speaker 8: that was capable of creating these types of structures in
Speaker 8: the first place probably had, because that seems elementary considering
Speaker 8: everything else that they've done.
Speaker 5: Thank you.
Speaker 8: If we have a minute, I'll go. I know you
Speaker 8: have to go, and if you want to cut me
Speaker 8: up off, that's fine, but I just.
Speaker 3: Want to talk. Sorry eventually, Yeah, sorry about okay.
Speaker 8: So whenever you have to go, just cut me off,
Speaker 8: it's fine. But I just want to give a little
Speaker 8: credibility to the star scans. In my there's a lot
Speaker 8: of critics. This is the scans that were done underneath
Speaker 8: the Pisa Pyramids and uh, this SAR technology. If you
Speaker 8: really want to learn a little bit more about the technique,
Speaker 8: I highly recommend this video that I have on the screen.
Speaker 8: And this is a fighter pilot that has used the
Speaker 8: STAR technology for military purposes and is familiar with it.
Speaker 8: And uh, this is all to say that SAR the
Speaker 8: synthetic aperture ratio. Uh, this this technology is not new.
Speaker 8: The technology has been around for a long time. What
Speaker 8: is new is the application of it. And there's a
Speaker 8: lot of criticism about Uh, these structures that are underneath
Speaker 8: the pyramids that they've they're saying they found and I
Speaker 8: want to say that their their technology is demonstrating that
Speaker 8: it probably is actually working.
Speaker 2: And the criticism.
Speaker 8: I've heard is that these columns underneath the pyramids can't
Speaker 8: exist because it's.
Speaker 2: Going through a water table.
Speaker 8: Well, if you understand the technology, what it's trying to
Speaker 8: do is it's trying to measure the vibrational noise of
Speaker 8: the structure itself and then measure the vibrational noise of
Speaker 8: the environment around it. Now, if the structure is going
Speaker 8: through a water table. The water is a liquid, and
Speaker 8: the water is going to absorb the vibrational noise from
Speaker 8: the structure itself, and this technology is trying to measure
Speaker 8: the differential in the vibrational noise of the structure from
Speaker 8: the environment around it. So the fact that there's strong
Speaker 8: vibrational noise from the structure at the top, but then
Speaker 8: as soon as the structure hits exactly where we expect
Speaker 8: the water table to be, the vibrational noise dampens abruptly
Speaker 8: and you can see a little bit of the faint outlines.
Speaker 2: But the fact that.
Speaker 8: It's dampening here is actually indicating that their technique is
Speaker 8: doing what they are saying it's doing. This is supposed
Speaker 8: to be, in my opinion, a known flaw in that
Speaker 8: the water table is absorbing the vibrational noise, therefore there
Speaker 8: won't be a differential between the water around the column
Speaker 8: structures and the vibrational noise of the structure itself. However,
Speaker 8: there is a lot of vibrational differential here and it
Speaker 8: looks like maybe the water table dips in this area,
Speaker 8: and so it would be really interesting to see if
Speaker 8: there was a way to verify whether or not the
Speaker 8: water table in this specific location actually does dip, and
Speaker 8: if so, that could add even more credibility to their technique.
Speaker 2: But in my.
Speaker 8: Opinion, since they've released their results in March and the
Speaker 8: discussions they've done since then, in my opinion, they're making
Speaker 8: a good faith effort and the technology and the technique
Speaker 8: that they're describing is doing what they're saying doing at least.
Speaker 5: Well, they have to introduce something that they're not telling
Speaker 5: us because this technology cannot go more than at five
Speaker 5: to seven meters underground, so they could never get to
Speaker 5: deeps the depths that they're saying, So either there is
Speaker 5: something more or they are wrong. And one thing they
Speaker 5: are wrong when they describe that Tubnesian stone that he
Speaker 5: said that is at the bottom around not exactly on
Speaker 5: the pyramid, I don't remember. It is the things or
Speaker 5: in that area. He said that it couldn't receive the
Speaker 5: signal it was black because tubnesium reflects the effects of
Speaker 5: the technology, and that is completely false because Tunisian would
Speaker 5: make through the waves as at around seven seven meters
Speaker 5: per second, So that part at least is completely wrong
Speaker 5: in scientific terms. And the fact that that technology is
Speaker 5: used often and it cannot go more than five seven
Speaker 5: meters in depth. So either they are using something more
Speaker 5: that they are not telling it, or this is a
Speaker 5: complete computer graphics that we are seeing.
Speaker 8: Yeah, so I'm not going to be any kind of
Speaker 8: source that is able to either validate or invalidate their
Speaker 8: their technique. All I'm trying to offer is that if
Speaker 8: you were to believe what they're saying, I'm not saying
Speaker 8: it is correct or and I'm not even saying that.
Speaker 5: What they're saying it corroborates your studies, what you're saying, and.
Speaker 2: What I'm trying.
Speaker 8: All I'm trying to indicate here is that there is
Speaker 8: consistency in their description of the technique and the results.
Speaker 8: If their technique does what they're saying it does, which
Speaker 8: again is beyond me. If it is true that it
Speaker 8: does what it's saying it does, then this is the
Speaker 8: actually the kind of result you would expect if it
Speaker 8: is doing that, is that you would expect the dampening
Speaker 8: of that signal as soon as the structure is hit
Speaker 8: the water table.
Speaker 2: That's all I'm trying to indicate.
Speaker 5: Absolutely, I agree with you.
Speaker 8: I have no idea how they're getting a kilometer down
Speaker 8: into the ground. I haven't heard them explain how they
Speaker 8: did that yet.
Speaker 4: At the Cosmic summon, and I don't even remember the answer. Okay,
Speaker 4: somebody asked him that question in the press room. I
Speaker 4: filmed it, and I don't remember what they said.
Speaker 8: We don't have enough time to talk about it, but
Speaker 8: I wanted to just show the picture at least. The
Speaker 8: taj Mahal shows quite a lot of mechanical similarities to
Speaker 8: what I just described. White exterior sandstone, porous stone on
Speaker 8: the inside, layers of construction, body of water underneath it,
Speaker 8: acoustic tuning in the central area, and more lots more.
Speaker 8: And I just wanted to demonstrate this because this is
Speaker 8: an example of something that's well.
Speaker 2: Preserved and I wanted to start.
Speaker 8: I made the argument early on that India has something
Speaker 8: to offer the world to this topic that most other
Speaker 8: places don't have, and this is one example, and I
Speaker 8: think that we should really relook at the taj Mahal.
Speaker 8: I would go into more detail, but I know you
Speaker 8: don't have time for it.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, sorry about that. I didn't honestly, I didn't
Speaker 4: think it was going to take you that long.
Speaker 3: My apologies.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, I ramble on for a long time.
Speaker 3: No, no, no, no, I was in saying it like that.
Speaker 8: I'm just I'm just so excited to have people to
Speaker 8: talk to about this. I don't understand. I've been doing
Speaker 8: this by myself for years. Nobody cares about this stuff
Speaker 8: out here, at least not not like enough to work
Speaker 8: on it.
Speaker 3: Yeah. No, no, all right, man, you're good, You're good.
Speaker 2: No.
Speaker 4: If I if I would have known, I probably would
Speaker 4: have made the show maybe, you know, a little bit
Speaker 4: earlier for you if if you could Okay, but uh,
Speaker 4: I could always get you back on and talk about
Speaker 4: it to continue a word, or do some other things
Speaker 4: that maybe you got going.
Speaker 3: Oh that's just right. You had the thing on AI
Speaker 3: that I was really interested in too.
Speaker 2: So yeah, yeah, I got there too, and I have
Speaker 2: some cool stuff. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I definitely wanted to talk to you about that
Speaker 3: in the future.
Speaker 4: But yeah, unfortunately, because I do have another show for
Speaker 4: people listening. We got Zachary Zachary Hubby coming on for
Speaker 4: Jamatria at like ten o'clock.
Speaker 3: That should be really interesting.
Speaker 4: But yeah, for everybody, Brooke real quick, let everybody know
Speaker 4: where the funny stuff.
Speaker 1: Yeah, absolutely, thank you so much for that presentation. That
Speaker 1: was incredible. You can find me on Instagram at dark
Speaker 1: florda podcast and wherever you get podcasts.
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, thank you very much for having me on.
Speaker 4: Of course, of course Tyrone let him know what's up?
Speaker 6: What's up everybody? So yeah, thanks, she said, I was
Speaker 6: a wonderful presentation.
Speaker 5: Man. You speak like a professor at a school and
Speaker 5: do it well.
Speaker 6: Everything that you find only you can find every breath
Speaker 6: of the word dot com. You can buy my book
Speaker 6: Journey through the Origins of History on Amazon and appreciate it.
Speaker 5: Thanks last Gees, I appreciate it.
Speaker 3: Bro Thank you everyone, thank you, thank you, appreciate it.
Speaker 3: And Riccardo, what is up?
Speaker 5: So again? I recommend this time is going to be
Speaker 5: the first recommendation. I recommend the Universe and Veiled podcast
Speaker 5: on YouTube, Institute for Natural Philosophy dot org and the
Speaker 5: Cut Calvert X and my book's resonance ares and the
Speaker 5: star Dust at Amazon. Thank you and thank you by
Speaker 5: She's and I'm sorry for my questions with it and
Speaker 5: just love it.
Speaker 8: You're the only person that ever curteaches me and the
Speaker 8: whole time I talk about it so like I wanted
Speaker 8: that to be honest, because I had no idea.
Speaker 2: If anything I said makes sense.
Speaker 5: Then send me an email. I'll send you my book.
Speaker 5: I think it will help you in terms of at
Speaker 5: least in terms of the papers that it presents. I
Speaker 5: think it will help.
Speaker 2: Okay, I'll add you on AX. I'll send you my email.
Speaker 3: I'll message you nice and Bennett.
Speaker 7: Broadcasting seeds dot com A sheesh man. I got a
Speaker 7: page of notes.
Speaker 5: Uh, I'm going to get on that India thing.
Speaker 7: So oh yeah, I've already kind of dabbled in into it,
Speaker 7: but it's just you know, you're opening a candle work.
Speaker 2: Is a great place to start.
Speaker 3: Yeah, So.
Speaker 7: I appreciate it.
Speaker 3: Thanks for coming on.
Speaker 4: It was awesome of course, of course, thank you for
Speaker 4: joining us and Ashish.
Speaker 3: If you want let people.
Speaker 8: Know what they can fund, you can find me on X.
Speaker 8: I'm social media illiterate and I'm learning. So my AX
Speaker 8: is message for Asish, the number four Asish message for ashiesh.
Speaker 2: Hit me up there.
Speaker 8: Hopefully I'll get better with this and refine it and
Speaker 8: be able to do this in a more.
Speaker 2: Formalized way.
Speaker 8: But I'm looking at trying to see if I can
Speaker 8: get some feedback and help build this up.
Speaker 2: Really, what I would like.
Speaker 8: To achieve here is I think we in the community
Speaker 8: understand that these aren't tombs, but what we need to
Speaker 8: really figure out is a starting point on how to
Speaker 8: solve all this all over the world. And that's really
Speaker 8: what I'm trying to get at ultimately, and then all
Speaker 8: the other stuff is just flavor text on top. So
Speaker 8: I really appreciate the opportunity like talk about all this.
Speaker 8: That's been great. I haven't really had an avenue to
Speaker 8: do this, and there's no school or class you can
Speaker 8: go to to try and reverse engineer advanced technology. So
Speaker 8: this is really the only way to get ideas out
Speaker 8: there and see if they make sense.
Speaker 3: No, that was great, Thank you very much.
Speaker 1: Man.
Speaker 3: That was just a lot. It was a serious presentation.
Speaker 3: I really appreciate it. Time on doing that.
Speaker 4: Yeah, again, like I said, we'll have to get you
Speaker 4: on in the future and talk about the AI. I
Speaker 4: appreciate everybody in the chat. That is what's up. Again,
Speaker 4: there's a lot of people here from the beginning to
Speaker 4: the end. I appreciate that. I appreciate some of the
Speaker 4: newer people coming back. That's what's up. That's why I
Speaker 4: go live. And again, everybody's links if they're not in
Speaker 4: the bottom. I'll make sure they're down there afterwards. But
Speaker 4: I think everybody should be the thing. But yeah, that's
Speaker 4: the end of another recult rejects. Until the next one.
Speaker 4: Everybody be will La