WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>The of, the of, the the the, the, the dot

2
00:00:29.679 --> 00:00:30.039
<v Speaker 1>to the.

3
00:00:32.240 --> 00:00:32.439
<v Speaker 2>Day.

4
00:02:31.439 --> 00:03:58.680
<v Speaker 3>Fo you gottle dottle bodn't brittle poopoo, Papa Papa.

5
00:04:00.120 --> 00:04:03.199
<v Speaker 4>This is the Elon my song. I love it. It's

6
00:04:03.240 --> 00:04:11.800
<v Speaker 4>become my favorite song. This is that South South Africa mix.

7
00:04:12.680 --> 00:04:22.560
<v Speaker 4>This that there's that Elon South Africa mix. Then it

8
00:04:22.600 --> 00:04:27.519
<v Speaker 4>comes up with that emotional orchestral and then we get

9
00:04:27.560 --> 00:04:33.399
<v Speaker 4>some drops and fat beats. Oh right, yet I'm joking.

10
00:04:33.439 --> 00:04:37.040
<v Speaker 4>Actually this song is the worst. I can't stand that song.

11
00:04:37.360 --> 00:04:45.240
<v Speaker 4>Oh that's the that's that Elon mix right there. Yeah,

12
00:04:45.240 --> 00:04:49.639
<v Speaker 4>I muted on Twitter because I was listening to them

13
00:04:49.800 --> 00:04:54.839
<v Speaker 4>hype beats from DJ Elon and the South Africa South

14
00:04:55.000 --> 00:04:59.959
<v Speaker 4>Africa boys. That's that South Africa mix. Then' that South

15
00:05:00.120 --> 00:05:04.439
<v Speaker 4>Africa mixed boy, which doesn't make sense because that's that's

16
00:05:04.519 --> 00:05:08.160
<v Speaker 4>a that's a Jamaican accine broader.

17
00:05:08.480 --> 00:05:12.800
<v Speaker 5>That the Jamaican accent rad Yeah what you're doing, thesis,

18
00:05:13.680 --> 00:05:14.680
<v Speaker 5>you're ra sister.

19
00:05:18.079 --> 00:05:21.680
<v Speaker 6>Me go to pet turtle. It is ureases.

20
00:05:22.800 --> 00:05:22.839
<v Speaker 7>Me.

21
00:05:23.000 --> 00:05:26.319
<v Speaker 6>Grind up the turtle, make him into a powder on

22
00:05:26.560 --> 00:05:36.040
<v Speaker 6>smoking men. Smoke the turtle. Everything you faking? Yeah, why

23
00:05:36.240 --> 00:05:36.800
<v Speaker 6>are you gay?

24
00:05:37.519 --> 00:05:42.120
<v Speaker 5>This is the Island mix the South Africa Island mix

25
00:05:42.759 --> 00:05:44.160
<v Speaker 5>me go to nice and sweating.

26
00:05:44.279 --> 00:05:50.800
<v Speaker 4>Now, why are you gay? You are gay? What's up?

27
00:05:52.759 --> 00:05:53.240
<v Speaker 8>What's up?

28
00:05:56.240 --> 00:06:05.959
<v Speaker 4>Open Forum debates what's happening to redeem zoomer Well. I

29
00:06:06.319 --> 00:06:09.439
<v Speaker 4>suspect he is at the stage that many of us

30
00:06:10.120 --> 00:06:13.199
<v Speaker 4>have gone through. Many of us got to the point

31
00:06:13.199 --> 00:06:18.920
<v Speaker 4>where we started to wonder if Protestantism might itself just

32
00:06:19.079 --> 00:06:21.680
<v Speaker 4>not be correct. So I think that's where he's at.

33
00:06:23.519 --> 00:06:25.279
<v Speaker 4>He said today, I would like to announce I'm giving

34
00:06:25.360 --> 00:06:28.959
<v Speaker 4>up Protestant apologetics. It's the biggest waste of time of

35
00:06:29.079 --> 00:06:33.079
<v Speaker 4>my life. I haven't defended Protestanism one bit. I've only

36
00:06:33.160 --> 00:06:36.040
<v Speaker 4>made people leave Protestanism. Seeing how bad I was at it,

37
00:06:38.160 --> 00:06:43.199
<v Speaker 4>I think that it was a noble attempt. I think

38
00:06:43.279 --> 00:06:49.959
<v Speaker 4>that it's just Protestantism. RZ. It's not your fault. I'm

39
00:06:50.000 --> 00:06:53.240
<v Speaker 4>annoyed at smarter Protestants who could have helped me, and

40
00:06:53.319 --> 00:06:56.279
<v Speaker 4>they didn't want to create YouTube channels. They were armchair quarterbacks.

41
00:06:56.879 --> 00:06:59.199
<v Speaker 4>I realized that Protestanism is the currency, is not something

42
00:06:59.240 --> 00:07:01.360
<v Speaker 4>that I can defend, that can be defended with a

43
00:07:01.399 --> 00:07:03.800
<v Speaker 4>straight face. It's a joke. So I'm going to go

44
00:07:03.920 --> 00:07:08.959
<v Speaker 4>defend institutional Protestanism. Well, if Protestism is a thing that's

45
00:07:09.000 --> 00:07:11.839
<v Speaker 4>stupid to defend, it's even dumber to go and defend

46
00:07:11.879 --> 00:07:13.839
<v Speaker 4>it in the institution, which is the thing that you're

47
00:07:13.879 --> 00:07:20.120
<v Speaker 4>admitting is weak, anti intellectual, and corrupt. If you want

48
00:07:20.120 --> 00:07:25.560
<v Speaker 4>to convert to Catholic, Oriental or Orthodox, I can't say

49
00:07:25.600 --> 00:07:28.399
<v Speaker 4>I prove, but I also can't blame you. So he's

50
00:07:28.439 --> 00:07:30.759
<v Speaker 4>at I think the stage that many of us enter.

51
00:07:32.439 --> 00:07:35.199
<v Speaker 4>So pray for redem Zoomer to become Orthodox. I suspect,

52
00:07:36.120 --> 00:07:40.600
<v Speaker 4>given the commitment to Calvinism, that he will. Okay, I'll

53
00:07:40.600 --> 00:07:47.560
<v Speaker 4>fix the volume that he will see anytime I go

54
00:07:47.639 --> 00:07:52.279
<v Speaker 4>on stream yard stream yards, people's streams automatically puts the

55
00:07:52.360 --> 00:07:56.399
<v Speaker 4>volume low. So that's why, so you have to go

56
00:07:56.519 --> 00:07:58.560
<v Speaker 4>in and change it every time because it's too bid streammarks.

57
00:07:58.720 --> 00:08:03.480
<v Speaker 4>But so rz is at the state we're all I

58
00:08:03.519 --> 00:08:06.839
<v Speaker 4>suspect because of the commitment within Calvinism to Augustinian is

59
00:08:06.839 --> 00:08:10.120
<v Speaker 4>some predestination that he will not, at any point soon

60
00:08:11.120 --> 00:08:15.759
<v Speaker 4>wants to give up the Augustinian stuff, and I suspect

61
00:08:15.800 --> 00:08:20.000
<v Speaker 4>that would lead him if he did leave Protestantism to

62
00:08:20.199 --> 00:08:24.680
<v Speaker 4>Rome unfortunately. But pray for him. Maybe he will maybe

63
00:08:24.720 --> 00:08:27.199
<v Speaker 4>he will come more in our direction. You what hit

64
00:08:27.279 --> 00:08:29.319
<v Speaker 4>like and share. Welcome everybody. We're going to open it

65
00:08:29.439 --> 00:08:34.679
<v Speaker 4>up to debates, discussions topics. Personally, I've been reading through

66
00:08:34.799 --> 00:08:39.440
<v Speaker 4>Jeremiah again. Usually when I finish Isaiah, I go to Jeremia.

67
00:08:39.440 --> 00:08:43.120
<v Speaker 4>I've been I've been cycling through the profits, the major

68
00:08:43.200 --> 00:08:46.279
<v Speaker 4>profits in the last couple of years, and then I'll

69
00:08:46.320 --> 00:08:49.919
<v Speaker 4>do Ezekiel again. So a lot of that stays fresh

70
00:08:49.960 --> 00:08:51.720
<v Speaker 4>in my mind, and that tends to be pretty good

71
00:08:51.799 --> 00:09:00.799
<v Speaker 4>for regular interactions with Muslims, with evangelical, dispensationalists, protest minded people,

72
00:09:01.879 --> 00:09:03.519
<v Speaker 4>people who don't think the Trinity is sought in the

73
00:09:03.559 --> 00:09:08.879
<v Speaker 4>Old Testament, and also the Psalms. So I'm reading back through.

74
00:09:09.000 --> 00:09:10.799
<v Speaker 4>I'm up to Psalm I don't know what, forget what

75
00:09:11.120 --> 00:09:17.440
<v Speaker 4>Psalm twenty or so I'm at Jeremiah thirty five or six,

76
00:09:20.279 --> 00:09:23.360
<v Speaker 4>and then I'll probably do Ezekiel again. And part of

77
00:09:23.399 --> 00:09:26.480
<v Speaker 4>the goal for that is to really have these major

78
00:09:26.559 --> 00:09:30.399
<v Speaker 4>profits fresh in my mind, and I find that cycling

79
00:09:30.519 --> 00:09:33.360
<v Speaker 4>through them over and over it really helps them to

80
00:09:33.480 --> 00:09:40.200
<v Speaker 4>be ingrained in my mind. A particular note was the

81
00:09:40.559 --> 00:09:47.200
<v Speaker 4>insights in Jeremiah thirty one. It is different in the

82
00:09:47.399 --> 00:09:51.360
<v Speaker 4>Orthodox Bible because it's the subtuagen. So the chapters in Jeremiah,

83
00:09:51.679 --> 00:09:53.840
<v Speaker 4>as you may or may not know, or number differently,

84
00:09:53.919 --> 00:09:57.320
<v Speaker 4>so this will get very confusing. Jeremiah thirty one in

85
00:09:57.519 --> 00:10:02.799
<v Speaker 4>the propt Bible is Jeremiah thirty eight ish in the

86
00:10:03.080 --> 00:10:09.200
<v Speaker 4>Orthodox Bible because of the septuagen But of course the

87
00:10:09.279 --> 00:10:11.960
<v Speaker 4>most this is one of the most famous passages. And

88
00:10:12.039 --> 00:10:13.679
<v Speaker 4>I was just thinking of this in terms of both

89
00:10:13.879 --> 00:10:18.879
<v Speaker 4>Islam and Judaism, that we are told that the emergence

90
00:10:18.919 --> 00:10:24.279
<v Speaker 4>of the Messiah is signified by a new Covenant, which

91
00:10:24.320 --> 00:10:26.919
<v Speaker 4>is interesting because if you think of the Jews, Jews

92
00:10:26.960 --> 00:10:29.759
<v Speaker 4>are always the mosaic Covenant is the pinnacle, it will

93
00:10:29.799 --> 00:10:33.480
<v Speaker 4>never go away. And yet we're told in Jeremiah's day

94
00:10:33.720 --> 00:10:36.960
<v Speaker 4>that a new Covenant is coming that is not according

95
00:10:37.000 --> 00:10:41.360
<v Speaker 4>to the Covenant of Sinai. I'm sure Jews have all

96
00:10:41.480 --> 00:10:44.879
<v Speaker 4>kinds of ways that they would interpret that. But also

97
00:10:44.960 --> 00:10:49.159
<v Speaker 4>replies it applies to Muslims because Muslims assume that they

98
00:10:49.240 --> 00:10:54.519
<v Speaker 4>are the finality of the divine revelation of the One

99
00:10:54.559 --> 00:10:58.200
<v Speaker 4>True God and that Muhammad was the last of the prophets.

100
00:10:58.840 --> 00:11:03.159
<v Speaker 4>Yet there is nothing in Islam akin to covenant theology,

101
00:11:03.720 --> 00:11:06.360
<v Speaker 4>the entire Bible, the entire structure of the Bible. Something

102
00:11:06.399 --> 00:11:11.000
<v Speaker 4>that Judaism at least and Christianity have in common because

103
00:11:11.039 --> 00:11:14.000
<v Speaker 4>of the Torah and the prophets in common is the

104
00:11:14.120 --> 00:11:17.440
<v Speaker 4>notion of God relating to his people via a covenant relationship.

105
00:11:18.080 --> 00:11:20.480
<v Speaker 4>And so we have a new covenant again here, and

106
00:11:21.799 --> 00:11:27.679
<v Speaker 4>Jeremiah thirty one discusses this and the eternality of the

107
00:11:27.759 --> 00:11:30.399
<v Speaker 4>seed of Israel, the eternality of the life of the

108
00:11:30.440 --> 00:11:35.399
<v Speaker 4>Messiah when this new Covenant comes, and then it's also

109
00:11:35.480 --> 00:11:41.240
<v Speaker 4>spoken of again after Jeremiah buys a field and prays

110
00:11:41.279 --> 00:11:43.600
<v Speaker 4>for understanding, all of which is a type and a

111
00:11:43.639 --> 00:11:48.120
<v Speaker 4>symbol of the land and the restoration. The restoration, of course,

112
00:11:48.200 --> 00:11:52.720
<v Speaker 4>ultimately is when the Messiah comes and restores Israel in

113
00:11:52.759 --> 00:11:55.399
<v Speaker 4>the sense of creating the new Israel, the new Covenant,

114
00:11:55.720 --> 00:12:01.159
<v Speaker 4>the spiritual Israel, which Israel in the land in history

115
00:12:01.279 --> 00:12:06.320
<v Speaker 4>is a type symbol foreshadowing. But both Jeremiah thirty one

116
00:12:06.360 --> 00:12:11.399
<v Speaker 4>and thirty three are very insightful in terms of this

117
00:12:11.759 --> 00:12:16.960
<v Speaker 4>new Covenant and what it's explained in Jeremiah thirty three.

118
00:12:19.279 --> 00:12:22.360
<v Speaker 4>The new Covenant that we're talking of here with these

119
00:12:22.799 --> 00:12:28.320
<v Speaker 4>priests and ministers, and the seed of David my servant

120
00:12:28.799 --> 00:12:33.639
<v Speaker 4>and his ministers is akin to the eternality of the

121
00:12:33.720 --> 00:12:38.720
<v Speaker 4>covenant with night and day, or the covenant of Genesis

122
00:12:38.799 --> 00:12:41.679
<v Speaker 4>in the creation of the world. So the very creation

123
00:12:41.840 --> 00:12:44.960
<v Speaker 4>of the world in Genesis is covenantal. And then of

124
00:12:45.039 --> 00:12:49.799
<v Speaker 4>course this also is closely linked to the Noeic Covenant,

125
00:12:49.879 --> 00:12:53.039
<v Speaker 4>where God speaks of a lot of elements within nature

126
00:12:53.679 --> 00:12:56.720
<v Speaker 4>that signs seasons. My covenant with nature will not depart.

127
00:12:56.799 --> 00:13:00.679
<v Speaker 4>So this is at once a reference back to Genesis

128
00:13:00.879 --> 00:13:05.600
<v Speaker 4>and to Noah into the New Covenant as well as

129
00:13:05.639 --> 00:13:10.559
<v Speaker 4>a reference to the Davidic Covenant. And what's fascinating about

130
00:13:10.639 --> 00:13:14.799
<v Speaker 4>Jeremi I thirty one and thirty three is the contrast

131
00:13:15.200 --> 00:13:19.240
<v Speaker 4>to the Mosaic Covenant. Now that does not mean the

132
00:13:19.320 --> 00:13:24.240
<v Speaker 4>Mosaic Covenant is something that we don't consider as part

133
00:13:24.279 --> 00:13:27.360
<v Speaker 4>of the covenantal structure. It's just that in terms of

134
00:13:27.480 --> 00:13:31.720
<v Speaker 4>the newness of the Covenant, when the Messiah comes, it

135
00:13:31.759 --> 00:13:37.519
<v Speaker 4>will specifically not be exactly like the Mosaic Covenant, as

136
00:13:37.679 --> 00:13:40.159
<v Speaker 4>Jeremi I thirty one said, not according to the Covenant

137
00:13:40.200 --> 00:13:43.679
<v Speaker 4>of Sinai, but will there will be a likening to

138
00:13:43.840 --> 00:13:50.360
<v Speaker 4>and a referencing to Genesis and Noah, the Adamic Covenant

139
00:13:50.399 --> 00:13:53.919
<v Speaker 4>and the Noaic Covenant. That is why in jeremi Em

140
00:13:53.919 --> 00:13:58.120
<v Speaker 4>excuse me, in the Acts fifteen, when the apostles are

141
00:13:58.200 --> 00:14:01.039
<v Speaker 4>discussing the means by which JENTI would be brought into

142
00:14:01.320 --> 00:14:04.960
<v Speaker 4>this very covenant that you see here in Jeremiah, it's

143
00:14:05.039 --> 00:14:08.200
<v Speaker 4>on the basis of the requirements in the Noea Covenant.

144
00:14:09.240 --> 00:14:12.840
<v Speaker 4>When the Jerusalem Council meets an next fifteen, they discuss, Look,

145
00:14:12.960 --> 00:14:17.639
<v Speaker 4>if Noah could be made righteous without circumcision, because this

146
00:14:17.799 --> 00:14:22.759
<v Speaker 4>is centuries prior to Abraham, thank you, then we ought

147
00:14:22.840 --> 00:14:26.679
<v Speaker 4>not require of gentile converts anything more than was required

148
00:14:28.679 --> 00:14:34.240
<v Speaker 4>in the Noea Covenant. If Noah was righteous, then that's

149
00:14:34.279 --> 00:14:40.320
<v Speaker 4>good or no, right, that's the decision that they're now.

150
00:14:40.559 --> 00:14:44.279
<v Speaker 4>Are they just making this up based up no Jeremiah

151
00:14:44.440 --> 00:14:48.440
<v Speaker 4>is rarely referenced in terms of Acts fifteen, But if

152
00:14:48.480 --> 00:14:53.159
<v Speaker 4>you read Jeremiah consistently through chapter by chapter, even in

153
00:14:53.200 --> 00:14:57.639
<v Speaker 4>the Masoretic text, you can see that that's the pattern

154
00:14:57.720 --> 00:14:59.879
<v Speaker 4>here of the description of the New Covenant. And again,

155
00:15:00.080 --> 00:15:03.120
<v Speaker 4>oftentimes we look at Jeremiah thirty one because it's so

156
00:15:03.279 --> 00:15:07.919
<v Speaker 4>famous for the New Covenant statement, but we forget. Jeremiah

157
00:15:07.919 --> 00:15:10.960
<v Speaker 4>thirty three is also part of that discourse of this

158
00:15:11.759 --> 00:15:16.320
<v Speaker 4>section of Jeremiah, and it also links the Dividic Covenant

159
00:15:17.200 --> 00:15:19.759
<v Speaker 4>back to Genesis and to Noah. So what we're seeing

160
00:15:19.840 --> 00:15:23.679
<v Speaker 4>is that even in the Old Testament there's a continuity

161
00:15:23.720 --> 00:15:29.559
<v Speaker 4>of the covenants. Now it's true again, the continuity here

162
00:15:29.960 --> 00:15:36.399
<v Speaker 4>is contrasting the Mosaic Covenant in some aspects, but not totally.

163
00:15:36.480 --> 00:15:38.759
<v Speaker 4>So we're not totally saying, oh the no, the Mosaic coven,

164
00:15:38.799 --> 00:15:42.200
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't matter anymore. You'll notice in Jeremiah thirty one

165
00:15:42.480 --> 00:15:47.960
<v Speaker 4>it does say that the Messiah will have the levites

166
00:15:48.000 --> 00:15:51.519
<v Speaker 4>and priests that minister to him. In the Orthodox Church,

167
00:15:51.600 --> 00:15:55.240
<v Speaker 4>we think that's the priest, so that's the diaconate. That is,

168
00:15:55.600 --> 00:15:59.080
<v Speaker 4>there's still continuity. Jesus says, not even a jot or

169
00:15:59.120 --> 00:16:02.279
<v Speaker 4>tittle in the law away until all things are fulfilled.

170
00:16:04.080 --> 00:16:07.919
<v Speaker 4>So how we keep those laws, the ceremonial laws and

171
00:16:07.960 --> 00:16:10.159
<v Speaker 4>so forth of the Mosaic coven in the New Testament

172
00:16:10.919 --> 00:16:14.759
<v Speaker 4>for the Gentiles, we still keep them, but we keep

173
00:16:14.799 --> 00:16:17.000
<v Speaker 4>them in a spiritual way, the way that they're intended

174
00:16:17.039 --> 00:16:20.279
<v Speaker 4>to be kept for all time. We think and not

175
00:16:20.639 --> 00:16:24.639
<v Speaker 4>for the limited temporal scope which they did legitimately have

176
00:16:25.480 --> 00:16:28.679
<v Speaker 4>for a time when the nation of Israel served its

177
00:16:28.840 --> 00:16:33.240
<v Speaker 4>historical purpose, which was to produce the Messiah. So in

178
00:16:33.399 --> 00:16:36.080
<v Speaker 4>this way we see a continuity of all the covenants,

179
00:16:36.519 --> 00:16:38.879
<v Speaker 4>even though there is an element of contrast between Mosaic

180
00:16:39.440 --> 00:16:44.159
<v Speaker 4>and Messiah's Covenant. Here we see that there's a continuity

181
00:16:44.200 --> 00:16:48.360
<v Speaker 4>of God's relationship to human beings in history. Thus, to

182
00:16:48.559 --> 00:16:51.759
<v Speaker 4>bring it not just in contrast to Judaism, but in

183
00:16:51.840 --> 00:16:57.120
<v Speaker 4>contrast to Islam. Notice how out of accord with all

184
00:16:57.159 --> 00:17:01.639
<v Speaker 4>of the historical relationships a relationship that God has with

185
00:17:01.720 --> 00:17:07.799
<v Speaker 4>human beings through covenants, Islam is So you've heard me

186
00:17:07.880 --> 00:17:11.480
<v Speaker 4>bring this up in debates. Where's the priesthood, where's the altar,

187
00:17:11.799 --> 00:17:15.799
<v Speaker 4>where's the temple, where's the sacrifice? Where's any of that?

188
00:17:16.440 --> 00:17:22.400
<v Speaker 4>In Islam? They're they're clueless, They're lost. Danielle says, well,

189
00:17:22.440 --> 00:17:24.960
<v Speaker 4>we kind of have like in moms and mosque that

190
00:17:25.000 --> 00:17:27.079
<v Speaker 4>has nothing to do with what we're talking about. It's

191
00:17:27.160 --> 00:17:29.559
<v Speaker 4>like not even a that's like a pale, not even

192
00:17:29.680 --> 00:17:35.400
<v Speaker 4>close similarity. There there has to be some form of

193
00:17:35.480 --> 00:17:40.200
<v Speaker 4>continuity of priesthood, of covenantal relationship and that's why the

194
00:17:40.240 --> 00:17:43.319
<v Speaker 4>New Testament is very clear. Paul says to the Corinthians,

195
00:17:43.440 --> 00:17:47.400
<v Speaker 4>all of the promises of the Covenant, that's a covenant reference.

196
00:17:48.519 --> 00:17:50.640
<v Speaker 4>We got these wine what are these these wine moms

197
00:17:50.720 --> 00:17:55.799
<v Speaker 4>over here, escape to discovery, cove on these ads. What

198
00:17:55.839 --> 00:17:59.599
<v Speaker 4>does that have to do with Bible Gateway? Like does

199
00:17:59.640 --> 00:18:04.359
<v Speaker 4>this suddenly there's a wine mom market for the ads

200
00:18:04.400 --> 00:18:06.640
<v Speaker 4>over here? But anyway, so you get. The point is

201
00:18:06.680 --> 00:18:10.880
<v Speaker 4>that the more fluent we are with the Old Testament,

202
00:18:11.039 --> 00:18:13.440
<v Speaker 4>with the law of the Profits, etc. The better and

203
00:18:13.559 --> 00:18:17.240
<v Speaker 4>easier it is to see the absurdity, the discontinuity, the

204
00:18:18.319 --> 00:18:22.519
<v Speaker 4>ad hoc nature of Islam. Yeah, Daniel's like, well, we

205
00:18:22.599 --> 00:18:25.319
<v Speaker 4>have emoms, Okay, that's nothing. That's not a priest dude,

206
00:18:25.359 --> 00:18:29.480
<v Speaker 4>what are you talking about? But do you see the

207
00:18:29.519 --> 00:18:34.039
<v Speaker 4>covenantal structure Jeremiah thirty one, Jeremia thirty three. References to Genesis,

208
00:18:34.160 --> 00:18:39.960
<v Speaker 4>references to Noah, references by extension to Abraham, references to

209
00:18:41.559 --> 00:18:44.759
<v Speaker 4>Moses and the Mosaic Covenant, and references to the Dividic covenants.

210
00:18:44.759 --> 00:18:47.920
<v Speaker 4>So those are all the covenants. Then we have the

211
00:18:48.000 --> 00:18:51.079
<v Speaker 4>finality of all of those. All of the covenants are

212
00:18:51.160 --> 00:18:54.599
<v Speaker 4>yay in him. Paul says that means they're all fulfilled

213
00:18:54.640 --> 00:19:03.000
<v Speaker 4>in Christ. This, by extension, also confronts and refutes dispensationalism.

214
00:19:05.799 --> 00:19:07.640
<v Speaker 4>So do you see how all of these dumb errors

215
00:19:07.680 --> 00:19:14.880
<v Speaker 4>and heresies, when we start to understand the cohesive, connected

216
00:19:14.960 --> 00:19:18.039
<v Speaker 4>narrative of the Bible, ends up refuting all of these

217
00:19:18.119 --> 00:19:22.799
<v Speaker 4>dumb errors. Whether it's the Judaic error or whether it's

218
00:19:23.960 --> 00:19:27.519
<v Speaker 4>the Islamic error or the dismensationless error, they all get refuted.

219
00:19:27.599 --> 00:19:31.519
<v Speaker 4>And by extension, you could even argue they refute Protestantism

220
00:19:31.599 --> 00:19:37.039
<v Speaker 4>because Protestantism ends up ahistorical, not historically linked to any

221
00:19:37.640 --> 00:19:43.440
<v Speaker 4>altered temple, priesthood sacrifice. In fact, Protestantism is actually premised

222
00:19:43.519 --> 00:19:49.440
<v Speaker 4>on rejecting those very things. So just some things that

223
00:19:49.559 --> 00:19:54.240
<v Speaker 4>came to me as I've been rereading Jeremiah. Obviously there's

224
00:19:54.279 --> 00:19:56.640
<v Speaker 4>many more things in Jeremiah that's not That's just one

225
00:19:56.720 --> 00:20:02.519
<v Speaker 4>thing that popped out to me recently. And by the way,

226
00:20:02.559 --> 00:20:06.279
<v Speaker 4>it also gives a crystallogical meaning. Did you notice this

227
00:20:06.440 --> 00:20:10.640
<v Speaker 4>to all the other covenants? In other words, the Adamic Covenant.

228
00:20:10.759 --> 00:20:15.200
<v Speaker 4>When Paul exegutes the Adamic Covenant, how does he explain it?

229
00:20:15.240 --> 00:20:15.359
<v Speaker 9>Oh?

230
00:20:15.400 --> 00:20:18.519
<v Speaker 4>He says, Christ is the new Atom. So in other words,

231
00:20:18.519 --> 00:20:21.480
<v Speaker 4>we should have a chrystological interpretation of the covenant with Adam.

232
00:20:22.000 --> 00:20:23.480
<v Speaker 4>And by the way, there is a covenant with Adam.

233
00:20:23.519 --> 00:20:26.599
<v Speaker 4>It's said to be a covenant in the minor prophets,

234
00:20:26.759 --> 00:20:31.640
<v Speaker 4>my covenant with Adam in the nowaic covenant. You think, well,

235
00:20:31.680 --> 00:20:34.359
<v Speaker 4>that's just a covenant of God's providence in nature, regularity

236
00:20:34.400 --> 00:20:37.640
<v Speaker 4>in nature. Oh, but it's also chrystological. Doesn't the New

237
00:20:37.680 --> 00:20:41.160
<v Speaker 4>Testament give that a crystall logical interpretation? The arc is

238
00:20:41.200 --> 00:20:46.319
<v Speaker 4>the church. No one's like Christ, et cetera. Abraham, Well,

239
00:20:46.359 --> 00:20:50.119
<v Speaker 4>that's obviously in Paul's letters and the epistles Galatians. Right,

240
00:20:50.920 --> 00:20:54.880
<v Speaker 4>even in Hebrews, the Gospel was preached beforehand to the forefathers.

241
00:20:55.079 --> 00:20:57.960
<v Speaker 4>The Gospel is preached to Abraham, Paul says a Galatians. Again,

242
00:20:58.160 --> 00:21:05.440
<v Speaker 4>continuity here, and see consistency. Each covenant builds on the

243
00:21:05.519 --> 00:21:09.920
<v Speaker 4>previous one. And even if when the Messiah comes, he

244
00:21:10.319 --> 00:21:12.200
<v Speaker 4>by his authority, because he's the one that gave the

245
00:21:12.319 --> 00:21:16.240
<v Speaker 4>law to Moses. Even if he says, some of these

246
00:21:16.319 --> 00:21:19.720
<v Speaker 4>things are fulfilled because I have now come, that doesn't

247
00:21:19.799 --> 00:21:24.039
<v Speaker 4>mean we're arbitrarily throwing out the Old Testament laws like

248
00:21:24.920 --> 00:21:31.559
<v Speaker 4>Messianic Jews think, or like dismiss we are Protestant seven

249
00:21:31.640 --> 00:21:34.920
<v Speaker 4>day avn is or something think or Bryson and his

250
00:21:35.079 --> 00:21:36.160
<v Speaker 4>goofy gris what that is?

251
00:21:36.319 --> 00:21:36.880
<v Speaker 10>What that is?

252
00:21:37.160 --> 00:21:37.759
<v Speaker 11>What that is?

253
00:21:37.960 --> 00:21:38.519
<v Speaker 2>What that is?

254
00:21:38.839 --> 00:21:38.960
<v Speaker 12>Right?

255
00:21:39.119 --> 00:21:40.200
<v Speaker 4>Bryson's nonsense?

256
00:21:41.559 --> 00:21:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

257
00:21:42.599 --> 00:21:47.119
<v Speaker 4>Anyway, whoever else, Because he's the Messiah, he has the

258
00:21:47.160 --> 00:21:49.720
<v Speaker 4>authority to say, these are the elements that are fulfilled.

259
00:21:50.279 --> 00:21:53.200
<v Speaker 4>And remember, even with this is something everybody misses that

260
00:21:53.279 --> 00:21:58.119
<v Speaker 4>doctor Branson brings up. I brought this up too. Even

261
00:21:58.960 --> 00:22:03.240
<v Speaker 4>Jews understand that not every aspect of the law was

262
00:22:03.359 --> 00:22:09.920
<v Speaker 4>for all of the gentiles. So Hebrew roots people and

263
00:22:10.119 --> 00:22:17.559
<v Speaker 4>other would be objectors don't even understand the Jewish view

264
00:22:17.680 --> 00:22:22.519
<v Speaker 4>of the law. I mean, you can't even keep the

265
00:22:22.759 --> 00:22:24.359
<v Speaker 4>first of all, you can't keep all the walls anyway,

266
00:22:24.400 --> 00:22:27.680
<v Speaker 4>but you can't even keep the land law. How is

267
00:22:27.759 --> 00:22:33.240
<v Speaker 4>the how is a gentile a thousand years later? And

268
00:22:35.880 --> 00:22:36.240
<v Speaker 4>or now?

269
00:22:37.359 --> 00:22:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Like?

270
00:22:37.519 --> 00:22:40.279
<v Speaker 4>How am I supposed to keep land walls? Am I

271
00:22:40.279 --> 00:22:43.480
<v Speaker 4>supposed to keep the Jubilee laws? This is crazy. Obviously,

272
00:22:44.240 --> 00:22:47.200
<v Speaker 4>the intention for this religion to be universal, which is

273
00:22:47.240 --> 00:22:52.000
<v Speaker 4>an intention the Messiah will come and the worship of

274
00:22:52.119 --> 00:22:54.400
<v Speaker 4>the God of the Jews will be made universal. Okay, well,

275
00:22:54.440 --> 00:22:58.720
<v Speaker 4>how could that happen if literally all aspects of the

276
00:22:58.799 --> 00:23:02.799
<v Speaker 4>Mosaic law we're intended for the entire world. Obviously it's

277
00:23:02.839 --> 00:23:04.680
<v Speaker 4>not and Jews don't even believe that. That's what I'm

278
00:23:04.680 --> 00:23:08.079
<v Speaker 4>trying to say. And ironically, what's the Jewish answer? Oh,

279
00:23:08.640 --> 00:23:13.480
<v Speaker 4>all the Noah Hyde laws. Well, isn't that interesting that

280
00:23:13.640 --> 00:23:17.160
<v Speaker 4>in Acts fifteen that's what the Christians already chose to do.

281
00:23:17.359 --> 00:23:19.759
<v Speaker 4>The apostles who were Jews chose to do that in

282
00:23:19.839 --> 00:23:23.799
<v Speaker 4>Acts fifteen. And I'm not equating Acts fifteen identically to

283
00:23:25.400 --> 00:23:27.680
<v Speaker 4>the Rabbinical idea of Noa Hyde laws. You get my

284
00:23:27.720 --> 00:23:30.960
<v Speaker 4>point though, anyway, So if we understand these things, we

285
00:23:31.039 --> 00:23:33.920
<v Speaker 4>begin to see how oh it and then actually a

286
00:23:34.000 --> 00:23:39.160
<v Speaker 4>lot of this is just totally refutes Islam, Rabbinic Judaism,

287
00:23:40.359 --> 00:23:43.799
<v Speaker 4>weird Protestant deviations and sex. So we're going to open

288
00:23:43.880 --> 00:23:46.079
<v Speaker 4>it up. It's open for him. That means that you

289
00:23:46.279 --> 00:23:49.400
<v Speaker 4>can you can ask a question if you want. You

290
00:23:49.480 --> 00:23:52.200
<v Speaker 4>don't have to debate, but I do give priority to

291
00:23:52.279 --> 00:23:54.759
<v Speaker 4>people who want to present an argument and would like

292
00:23:54.839 --> 00:23:58.200
<v Speaker 4>to present some form of debate. If you would like

293
00:23:58.319 --> 00:24:01.200
<v Speaker 4>to make if you say, hey, I want to make

294
00:24:01.759 --> 00:24:04.640
<v Speaker 4>several minute argument here, let me make my case. I

295
00:24:04.720 --> 00:24:07.920
<v Speaker 4>will let you do that. I will not interrupt unless

296
00:24:08.400 --> 00:24:12.160
<v Speaker 4>you start making fallacies or say something really ridiculous and stupid.

297
00:24:13.079 --> 00:24:15.160
<v Speaker 4>Then I will interrupt you and bring you back to

298
00:24:15.279 --> 00:24:18.960
<v Speaker 4>the point. If we are going back and forth, it

299
00:24:19.119 --> 00:24:21.279
<v Speaker 4>is my channel, it is my stream. I will interrupt

300
00:24:21.319 --> 00:24:25.160
<v Speaker 4>you if I want to, if you especially are making

301
00:24:25.240 --> 00:24:29.240
<v Speaker 4>dumb arguments, fallacies, red herrings, or whatever. Now I think

302
00:24:29.279 --> 00:24:32.319
<v Speaker 4>we had a Catholic guy who has popped up here. First, Drego,

303
00:24:33.799 --> 00:24:35.039
<v Speaker 4>Ivan Drago, what's up.

304
00:24:35.039 --> 00:24:46.039
<v Speaker 2>Man, Jay, what's happened? Yes, sir, Yeah, I just caught

305
00:24:46.079 --> 00:24:47.400
<v Speaker 2>the tail end here.

306
00:24:47.440 --> 00:24:50.319
<v Speaker 13>It's super interesting because I run into well you mentioned

307
00:24:50.359 --> 00:24:51.640
<v Speaker 13>Bryson and a lot.

308
00:24:51.599 --> 00:24:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Of people in that movement as well.

309
00:24:54.359 --> 00:24:56.799
<v Speaker 13>I think one of the caveats they say is that, oh,

310
00:24:56.960 --> 00:24:59.880
<v Speaker 13>you know, some of these laws are contingent upon their

311
00:25:00.160 --> 00:25:03.519
<v Speaker 13>a temple. So that's the reason they don't apply because

312
00:25:03.519 --> 00:25:04.319
<v Speaker 13>there is an a temple.

313
00:25:04.440 --> 00:25:07.079
<v Speaker 2>But you wait, once the temple comes back, you better

314
00:25:07.119 --> 00:25:08.839
<v Speaker 2>get your goats ready because you're going to have to

315
00:25:09.000 --> 00:25:10.400
<v Speaker 2>start doing some sacrifices.

316
00:25:12.480 --> 00:25:15.200
<v Speaker 4>Well again, like you know, you have all of these

317
00:25:15.319 --> 00:25:19.880
<v Speaker 4>prophecies like among the nations, my name will be great,

318
00:25:20.039 --> 00:25:23.359
<v Speaker 4>and my incense will be offered to my name among

319
00:25:23.480 --> 00:25:26.200
<v Speaker 4>the gentiles. Right like the minor prophets, those are clearly

320
00:25:26.279 --> 00:25:31.640
<v Speaker 4>Messianic prophecies that extend the altar and the incense and

321
00:25:31.759 --> 00:25:36.319
<v Speaker 4>the priesthood outside of the limitations of physical Israel. How

322
00:25:36.440 --> 00:25:40.279
<v Speaker 4>is that possible? Isaiah in two or three places mentions

323
00:25:40.400 --> 00:25:44.400
<v Speaker 4>gentile priests, how is that even possible? And so Bryson

324
00:25:44.440 --> 00:25:47.680
<v Speaker 4>has actually missed the very point of the coming of

325
00:25:47.720 --> 00:25:51.839
<v Speaker 4>the Messiah, which is to bring the Melchizedekian priesthood, which

326
00:25:52.440 --> 00:25:56.319
<v Speaker 4>the author of Hebrews says very clearly in chapter seven

327
00:25:56.519 --> 00:26:00.000
<v Speaker 4>is superior to the Iaronic priesthood. So Bryson is actually

328
00:26:00.039 --> 00:26:01.119
<v Speaker 4>really just a retard.

329
00:26:03.359 --> 00:26:06.279
<v Speaker 13>Well, yeah, I don't I don't understand now the milk

330
00:26:06.279 --> 00:26:08.440
<v Speaker 13>because at that point gets rationalized.

331
00:26:08.480 --> 00:26:10.240
<v Speaker 2>But but there, you know, there is a way that

332
00:26:10.319 --> 00:26:11.200
<v Speaker 2>they rationalize it.

333
00:26:12.400 --> 00:26:15.119
<v Speaker 13>What you know one, So I've got it pretty in

334
00:26:15.200 --> 00:26:17.480
<v Speaker 13>depth with this because I was shocked when I first

335
00:26:17.519 --> 00:26:19.880
<v Speaker 13>heard you know this, you need to follow mosaic law stuff,

336
00:26:19.920 --> 00:26:21.839
<v Speaker 13>and I'm like, there's no way, like the scriptures can

337
00:26:21.880 --> 00:26:24.200
<v Speaker 13>support it. But then there, you know, they have enough

338
00:26:24.279 --> 00:26:27.559
<v Speaker 13>of like acrobatics. And I mean in some sense, actually,

339
00:26:27.559 --> 00:26:29.279
<v Speaker 13>I mean fair enough, when Christ said I don't want

340
00:26:29.319 --> 00:26:30.119
<v Speaker 13>to destroy the law.

341
00:26:30.440 --> 00:26:32.279
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'm not going to abolish the law.

342
00:26:32.759 --> 00:26:34.759
<v Speaker 13>I mean, there is a lot of rhetorical force, and

343
00:26:35.079 --> 00:26:39.920
<v Speaker 13>they have an interpreted interpretive framework where there is some

344
00:26:40.319 --> 00:26:43.440
<v Speaker 13>merit to their lens from a Bible alone perspective, which

345
00:26:43.480 --> 00:26:47.160
<v Speaker 13>obviously we rejected that the sol scripture concept. But looking

346
00:26:47.200 --> 00:26:50.000
<v Speaker 13>into history, I'm like, well, it seems like the fathers

347
00:26:50.039 --> 00:26:53.519
<v Speaker 13>actually debated this, and it wasn't until like Augustin and Jerome,

348
00:26:53.559 --> 00:26:56.319
<v Speaker 13>when they had letters back and forth, they finally.

349
00:26:56.000 --> 00:26:57.799
<v Speaker 2>Agreed on the role of the Mosaic law.

350
00:26:57.880 --> 00:27:01.279
<v Speaker 13>Because in the pro mosaic side, Jesus followed the law.

351
00:27:01.680 --> 00:27:04.920
<v Speaker 13>You had the early Apostles, the Disciples, the first generation

352
00:27:05.000 --> 00:27:07.720
<v Speaker 13>of Christians seemingly followed the Mosaic law.

353
00:27:08.279 --> 00:27:10.440
<v Speaker 2>And so I mean, do you think that.

354
00:27:12.440 --> 00:27:14.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I don't mean to be contentious, but I

355
00:27:14.720 --> 00:27:16.799
<v Speaker 4>don't think that's true at all. The idea that the

356
00:27:16.920 --> 00:27:19.400
<v Speaker 4>Church had not settled this issue until the fourth century

357
00:27:19.480 --> 00:27:22.279
<v Speaker 4>with Roman and Augustine, I think is pretty preposterous. I

358
00:27:22.400 --> 00:27:25.279
<v Speaker 4>think that the Letter of Hebrews solved this issue. I

359
00:27:25.319 --> 00:27:28.559
<v Speaker 4>think that within the Book of Acts itself, Paul had

360
00:27:28.599 --> 00:27:31.920
<v Speaker 4>to struggle to really convince people, even like Peter, that

361
00:27:32.240 --> 00:27:35.240
<v Speaker 4>his position was the correct one. You know, God had

362
00:27:35.319 --> 00:27:39.480
<v Speaker 4>to send Peter three visions about the food laws and

363
00:27:39.519 --> 00:27:42.240
<v Speaker 4>that the dietary laws were not applicable to gentiles, and

364
00:27:42.319 --> 00:27:45.359
<v Speaker 4>that they were symbolic. And that's why throughout Paul's epistles

365
00:27:45.400 --> 00:27:48.000
<v Speaker 4>he's constantly having to stress this, whether it's Galatians, whether

366
00:27:48.000 --> 00:27:50.839
<v Speaker 4>it's Hebrews, or whether it's you know, his his arguments

367
00:27:50.880 --> 00:27:53.599
<v Speaker 4>with Peter. No, it is this is not something that's

368
00:27:53.680 --> 00:27:58.119
<v Speaker 4>quote settled by the fourth century Latin Church fathers. The

369
00:27:58.440 --> 00:28:01.720
<v Speaker 4>remnants I think of this. The latest, in my opinion,

370
00:28:01.759 --> 00:28:06.920
<v Speaker 4>would be the Quartodscaminarian controversy, which has elements of a

371
00:28:07.000 --> 00:28:10.400
<v Speaker 4>holdover of Jewish calendar dates. That's probably the latest that

372
00:28:10.480 --> 00:28:13.880
<v Speaker 4>I would say, you could you could find this judaizing tendency,

373
00:28:14.440 --> 00:28:18.319
<v Speaker 4>and that's like, you know, one eighty one is the

374
00:28:18.400 --> 00:28:25.279
<v Speaker 4>latest because Aeronais rebukes Pope Saint Victor over the trying

375
00:28:25.319 --> 00:28:28.319
<v Speaker 4>to force one tradition tradition over the whole church, which

376
00:28:28.480 --> 00:28:32.960
<v Speaker 4>was concerning the Quartodessemonarian controversy. So just with a New

377
00:28:33.039 --> 00:28:36.480
<v Speaker 4>Testament execusis itself. No, I think that this issue is

378
00:28:36.640 --> 00:28:41.119
<v Speaker 4>settled by the time of Late within the Book of

379
00:28:41.160 --> 00:28:43.160
<v Speaker 4>Acts and Paul's later epistles.

380
00:28:44.480 --> 00:28:46.799
<v Speaker 13>Well, do you might even though I agree with you

381
00:28:47.200 --> 00:28:49.079
<v Speaker 13>that you know we're not found by the mosaic law?

382
00:28:49.160 --> 00:28:51.200
<v Speaker 13>Can I offer a steel man here? Because I've gotten

383
00:28:51.240 --> 00:28:54.279
<v Speaker 13>pretty I pushed back. I've quoted the Peter vision, I've

384
00:28:54.319 --> 00:28:55.880
<v Speaker 13>quoted all this stuff, and can I give you a

385
00:28:55.920 --> 00:28:56.680
<v Speaker 13>steel man of what?

386
00:28:56.799 --> 00:28:59.920
<v Speaker 4>They would say, Well, you can, absolutely, But I would

387
00:29:00.519 --> 00:29:03.519
<v Speaker 4>point out that I did debate Bryson, so I'm familiar

388
00:29:03.559 --> 00:29:06.240
<v Speaker 4>with some of their positions. They Oh, yeah, I did

389
00:29:06.279 --> 00:29:08.119
<v Speaker 4>about a three hour debate with Bryson. You can look

390
00:29:08.160 --> 00:29:10.359
<v Speaker 4>that up. But yeah, go ahead, I.

391
00:29:10.359 --> 00:29:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Gotta look at it.

392
00:29:11.000 --> 00:29:12.960
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I mean the Peter's vision, right a rise, kill

393
00:29:13.000 --> 00:29:17.680
<v Speaker 13>and eat rightly after that vision, you know, he says, well,

394
00:29:17.720 --> 00:29:21.000
<v Speaker 13>the purpose is to you know, point to not separating

395
00:29:21.039 --> 00:29:21.559
<v Speaker 13>yourself from.

396
00:29:21.480 --> 00:29:23.640
<v Speaker 2>The gentiles, which, of course is like, well.

397
00:29:23.599 --> 00:29:26.359
<v Speaker 13>Why would God use the means of having you eat

398
00:29:26.480 --> 00:29:29.039
<v Speaker 13>the animals if he wasn't fine with it? But they're

399
00:29:29.079 --> 00:29:31.400
<v Speaker 13>saying that the problem is that the Jews of the

400
00:29:31.519 --> 00:29:38.119
<v Speaker 13>day took the priestly rules and they made them requirements.

401
00:29:37.559 --> 00:29:39.920
<v Speaker 2>For like being a true Jew or salvation.

402
00:29:40.240 --> 00:29:43.799
<v Speaker 13>Right, so like even with the circumcision, their reframe of

403
00:29:43.880 --> 00:29:47.680
<v Speaker 13>back fifteen Council of jerusalemess to say not that circumcision

404
00:29:47.720 --> 00:29:52.480
<v Speaker 13>is abolished, but that it's not required to become one

405
00:29:52.519 --> 00:29:53.240
<v Speaker 13>of God's people.

406
00:29:53.319 --> 00:29:56.279
<v Speaker 2>But once you are God's people, you should follow the law.

407
00:29:56.599 --> 00:29:59.079
<v Speaker 13>And I know it sounds a little bit of like acrobatics,

408
00:29:59.119 --> 00:29:59.799
<v Speaker 13>but but that'.

409
00:30:00.079 --> 00:30:04.839
<v Speaker 4>I mean if you took maybe that in isolation from acts, okay, maybe,

410
00:30:05.000 --> 00:30:10.279
<v Speaker 4>but look, we have Paul's epistles many times over Colossians Timothy,

411
00:30:11.160 --> 00:30:13.680
<v Speaker 4>for example, Paul says to Timothy, right, nothing in itself

412
00:30:13.759 --> 00:30:17.720
<v Speaker 4>is unclean, but rather all meats are clean when they

413
00:30:17.720 --> 00:30:19.960
<v Speaker 4>are sanctified by the word of God and prayer. For

414
00:30:20.079 --> 00:30:23.519
<v Speaker 4>Simothy four to five in Colostionans, he talks about how, look,

415
00:30:23.640 --> 00:30:27.720
<v Speaker 4>circumcision or uncircumcision means nothing. In fact, baptism is the

416
00:30:27.920 --> 00:30:33.240
<v Speaker 4>new circumcision, and circumcision had no ability to do anything. Baptism,

417
00:30:33.319 --> 00:30:37.000
<v Speaker 4>Paul says, is the power of regeneration. So they're so

418
00:30:37.160 --> 00:30:41.480
<v Speaker 4>foolish is to not even understand that baptismal regeneration disproves

419
00:30:42.000 --> 00:30:45.279
<v Speaker 4>their idea about continuing to do circumcisions Paul saying that

420
00:30:45.680 --> 00:30:48.839
<v Speaker 4>it's not just that the Old Testament rituals and rights

421
00:30:48.960 --> 00:30:52.160
<v Speaker 4>were symbolic, it's also that the rights of the New

422
00:30:52.240 --> 00:30:56.160
<v Speaker 4>Testament actually bring the grace they signify, whereas the rights

423
00:30:56.200 --> 00:30:59.000
<v Speaker 4>of the Old Testament pointed to the New Testament rights.

424
00:30:59.160 --> 00:31:02.200
<v Speaker 4>So what does circuits decision point two? Water baptism? So

425
00:31:02.240 --> 00:31:04.759
<v Speaker 4>it would be a reversion, which is what the entire

426
00:31:05.160 --> 00:31:07.359
<v Speaker 4>argument of the look of Hebrews is, to go back

427
00:31:07.400 --> 00:31:10.160
<v Speaker 4>to doing the rituals that are signs and symbols of

428
00:31:10.200 --> 00:31:13.440
<v Speaker 4>the realities that have come in this case, namely water baptism.

429
00:31:15.640 --> 00:31:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I agree with you.

430
00:31:17.559 --> 00:31:20.200
<v Speaker 4>So I well, I mean what would they say to

431
00:31:20.319 --> 00:31:23.240
<v Speaker 4>first Timothy four and five that foods are not unclean?

432
00:31:23.359 --> 00:31:27.000
<v Speaker 4>In fact, foods aren't made clean by the work by praying.

433
00:31:28.720 --> 00:31:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'd have to review my notes on that, fair enough.

434
00:31:32.559 --> 00:31:32.799
<v Speaker 2>I know.

435
00:31:32.880 --> 00:31:36.319
<v Speaker 13>A big pivot is they always backtrack to, well, you

436
00:31:36.440 --> 00:31:39.079
<v Speaker 13>had the mission that you had these extra pharaistical laws

437
00:31:39.160 --> 00:31:41.079
<v Speaker 13>and like the washing of hands, because even like in

438
00:31:41.200 --> 00:31:42.119
<v Speaker 13>Mark was.

439
00:31:42.119 --> 00:31:47.079
<v Speaker 2>It Mark seven where there's about cleanliness and.

440
00:31:48.839 --> 00:31:51.559
<v Speaker 13>You know, yeah, I'd have to go back to specifically

441
00:31:51.559 --> 00:31:54.599
<v Speaker 13>and the Timothy thing one reference I'll say though, it's

442
00:31:54.640 --> 00:31:57.519
<v Speaker 13>a pretty powerful organization in this movement. It's called one

443
00:31:57.559 --> 00:32:01.440
<v Speaker 13>one nine Ministries, and they have really strong rhetorical chops

444
00:32:01.440 --> 00:32:02.160
<v Speaker 13>and frankly, I.

445
00:32:02.160 --> 00:32:03.759
<v Speaker 2>Mean they do have some scholarship stuff.

446
00:32:04.240 --> 00:32:09.440
<v Speaker 13>They they have the alternative interpretation on every challenging scripture.

447
00:32:09.440 --> 00:32:11.559
<v Speaker 2>So I'll go back, I'll see what they have to

448
00:32:11.599 --> 00:32:12.440
<v Speaker 2>say about the first time.

449
00:32:12.799 --> 00:32:14.240
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, what's what I mean, the whole Book

450
00:32:14.279 --> 00:32:17.759
<v Speaker 4>of Hebrews really is, you know, geared towards pointing out

451
00:32:17.839 --> 00:32:20.160
<v Speaker 4>that now that the realities have come, to go back

452
00:32:20.200 --> 00:32:24.279
<v Speaker 4>to the shadows which are types. Is absurd. So I mean,

453
00:32:24.680 --> 00:32:29.000
<v Speaker 4>just just the whole purpose of two epistles in the

454
00:32:29.039 --> 00:32:32.960
<v Speaker 4>New Testament are directed towards refuting the Judaizing heresy. So

455
00:32:33.079 --> 00:32:35.839
<v Speaker 4>the fact that they would even attempt to like this

456
00:32:36.000 --> 00:32:38.119
<v Speaker 4>is like, I mean, this is as silly as saying,

457
00:32:38.319 --> 00:32:42.519
<v Speaker 4>you know, like the New Testament doesn't teach the deep Christ.

458
00:32:42.599 --> 00:32:44.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there's like so many passages that the deal with,

459
00:32:45.079 --> 00:32:47.079
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the Gospel of John is all about the

460
00:32:47.160 --> 00:32:49.880
<v Speaker 4>deed of Christ. So it's to me it's as absurd

461
00:32:50.519 --> 00:32:53.079
<v Speaker 4>to say that, you know, we've got to keep these

462
00:32:53.119 --> 00:32:55.720
<v Speaker 4>ceremonial laws and another indicator, by the way that these

463
00:32:55.720 --> 00:32:59.000
<v Speaker 4>people are heretical sects is that many of them, like

464
00:32:59.119 --> 00:33:02.200
<v Speaker 4>Bryson did, they don't teach the duty of Christ. I mean,

465
00:33:02.240 --> 00:33:03.960
<v Speaker 4>that's a pretty good indicator that you're dealing with a

466
00:33:04.000 --> 00:33:06.200
<v Speaker 4>heretical sect. What do they and they don't want to

467
00:33:06.200 --> 00:33:08.119
<v Speaker 4>talk about that. So if you go watch my bryceon debate,

468
00:33:08.559 --> 00:33:10.559
<v Speaker 4>I bring this up and it makes him mad and

469
00:33:10.680 --> 00:33:11.960
<v Speaker 4>he explicitly says, I don't.

470
00:33:11.799 --> 00:33:13.200
<v Speaker 14>Want to talk about that. We are supposed to be

471
00:33:13.319 --> 00:33:15.200
<v Speaker 14>that we need to bate Net, we need debate Deity.

472
00:33:16.119 --> 00:33:20.079
<v Speaker 14>We're supposed to debate only his interpretation of Matthew five.

473
00:33:20.799 --> 00:33:24.720
<v Speaker 14>And my point is that like, if your sect is true,

474
00:33:25.359 --> 00:33:26.319
<v Speaker 14>you would at least.

475
00:33:26.200 --> 00:33:28.720
<v Speaker 4>Get the weightier matters of the law, like the deity

476
00:33:28.759 --> 00:33:31.960
<v Speaker 4>of Christ, correct over these things. And what do they do,

477
00:33:32.160 --> 00:33:34.720
<v Speaker 4>like every sect do they want to focus on these

478
00:33:34.839 --> 00:33:38.640
<v Speaker 4>kinds of bodily washings and stupid stuff what Paul calls

479
00:33:38.720 --> 00:33:41.759
<v Speaker 4>the beggarly elements of this world over the more important

480
00:33:41.799 --> 00:33:42.759
<v Speaker 4>doctrines of the Trinity.

481
00:33:44.440 --> 00:33:48.200
<v Speaker 13>Well, right, But I think that that points to the

482
00:33:48.279 --> 00:33:51.200
<v Speaker 13>limitations of like the Sola scripture of framework.

483
00:33:50.880 --> 00:33:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, because arguably, if all you have is a Bible.

484
00:33:54.359 --> 00:33:58.839
<v Speaker 13>You can't necessarily come to the conclusion of trinity and

485
00:33:58.960 --> 00:34:01.279
<v Speaker 13>the deity of Christ with the Scripture alone, like you

486
00:34:01.440 --> 00:34:04.839
<v Speaker 13>needed the authority of the Church, the Apostolic hand up.

487
00:34:04.839 --> 00:34:08.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I disagree with that totally, because Jesus holds

488
00:34:08.079 --> 00:34:11.159
<v Speaker 4>the people in his generation liable for not believing in

489
00:34:11.320 --> 00:34:13.960
<v Speaker 4>him and not believing that the Old Testament teaches the Trinity.

490
00:34:14.119 --> 00:34:17.159
<v Speaker 4>So I totally disagree. I do not believe in solid scriptura,

491
00:34:17.440 --> 00:34:19.440
<v Speaker 4>but I do not believe that belief in the deity

492
00:34:19.480 --> 00:34:24.199
<v Speaker 4>of Christ requires the authority of the Church, because before

493
00:34:24.239 --> 00:34:29.000
<v Speaker 4>there's even a church set up, Jesus lauds Peter for

494
00:34:29.440 --> 00:34:32.639
<v Speaker 4>proclaiming his deity, and in fact, in John five through nine,

495
00:34:33.000 --> 00:34:36.480
<v Speaker 4>he excoriates the Pharisees for not recognizing that he was

496
00:34:36.519 --> 00:34:39.599
<v Speaker 4>the one that spoke to Moses and to Abraham because

497
00:34:39.639 --> 00:34:40.880
<v Speaker 4>Abraham believed in the Trinity.

498
00:34:42.840 --> 00:34:45.559
<v Speaker 13>That's interesting, Yet, that sounds like what the religion of

499
00:34:45.599 --> 00:34:46.880
<v Speaker 13>the Apostles book.

500
00:34:46.920 --> 00:34:49.559
<v Speaker 2>A lot of the old a lot of good.

501
00:34:49.480 --> 00:34:52.480
<v Speaker 4>Goat, right. It's actually the argument of justin against trifle.

502
00:34:52.199 --> 00:34:55.760
<v Speaker 2>The Jews, So justin against TREIFO. Okay, have you read.

503
00:34:55.840 --> 00:34:58.800
<v Speaker 4>John five through nine. I'm not trying to be a dickhead.

504
00:34:58.840 --> 00:35:01.519
<v Speaker 4>I'm just saying, like, I'm not being rude to you

505
00:35:01.599 --> 00:35:03.719
<v Speaker 4>a but when I hear Roman Catholics say this stuff

506
00:35:03.760 --> 00:35:06.519
<v Speaker 4>to me, it's just sort of signifies, Like I mean,

507
00:35:06.719 --> 00:35:09.559
<v Speaker 4>John five through nine is Jesus constantly arguing with the

508
00:35:09.599 --> 00:35:12.119
<v Speaker 4>Pharisees that you're liable for not believing in me because

509
00:35:12.159 --> 00:35:15.800
<v Speaker 4>the Old Testament all taught me and Abraham worshiped the Trinity.

510
00:35:16.079 --> 00:35:17.079
<v Speaker 4>That do you believe that or not?

511
00:35:19.400 --> 00:35:22.280
<v Speaker 13>Right, Well, I suppose if you're a Pharisee back then,

512
00:35:23.119 --> 00:35:26.480
<v Speaker 13>you know that there's a Messiah and maybe someone from

513
00:35:26.519 --> 00:35:29.039
<v Speaker 13>the you know, one of the persons of the Trinity,

514
00:35:30.159 --> 00:35:32.199
<v Speaker 13>but you weren't sure. You were trying to discern whether

515
00:35:32.320 --> 00:35:35.480
<v Speaker 13>Jesus Christ there this guy was the Messiah versus some other.

516
00:35:36.559 --> 00:35:40.079
<v Speaker 4>Well, I understand that. But from this point on afterwards, right,

517
00:35:40.320 --> 00:35:42.800
<v Speaker 4>Jesus says to them, you are now liable because you have.

518
00:35:42.880 --> 00:35:46.239
<v Speaker 2>Seen right, because yeah, you've seen it.

519
00:35:46.320 --> 00:35:49.360
<v Speaker 13>Didn't believe exactly at some at some point I would

520
00:35:49.519 --> 00:35:52.559
<v Speaker 13>like to get of course, I wouldn't have expected you

521
00:35:52.679 --> 00:35:55.800
<v Speaker 13>to have this prepared now, but at some point your

522
00:35:55.840 --> 00:35:58.480
<v Speaker 13>opinion on the letter with Augustine and Jerome, because I

523
00:35:58.559 --> 00:36:01.400
<v Speaker 13>know the mosaic while they were debating on it, like

524
00:36:01.519 --> 00:36:04.480
<v Speaker 13>Jerome was confused because you're saying, why did Paul keep

525
00:36:04.559 --> 00:36:07.400
<v Speaker 13>practicing the laws? And any of the conclusion they came

526
00:36:07.480 --> 00:36:09.800
<v Speaker 13>down to is like, if the Jews want to keep

527
00:36:09.840 --> 00:36:13.519
<v Speaker 13>practicing mosaic law, like the converted Christians, let them practice it,

528
00:36:13.599 --> 00:36:16.960
<v Speaker 13>but don't compel the Gentiles to do it. Because and

529
00:36:17.039 --> 00:36:19.199
<v Speaker 13>they said, well, why didn't we abolish the mosaic.

530
00:36:19.000 --> 00:36:20.039
<v Speaker 2>Law in the first generation.

531
00:36:20.360 --> 00:36:24.480
<v Speaker 13>Augustin said, well, it's like having an honorable funeral.

532
00:36:24.960 --> 00:36:25.800
<v Speaker 2>You don't want to just.

533
00:36:25.920 --> 00:36:27.760
<v Speaker 13>Like desecrate the body. You want to give it a

534
00:36:27.840 --> 00:36:31.159
<v Speaker 13>proper burial, honor the ancestors. Because if we just chopped

535
00:36:31.199 --> 00:36:33.639
<v Speaker 13>the mosaic law in one generation, it would be like

536
00:36:33.719 --> 00:36:34.719
<v Speaker 13>suggesting that God.

537
00:36:34.599 --> 00:36:36.599
<v Speaker 2>Who came up with nonsense in the Old Testament.

538
00:36:37.000 --> 00:36:39.559
<v Speaker 13>And so that's why there's like a slow transition, which

539
00:36:39.599 --> 00:36:40.960
<v Speaker 13>again it's still kind of perplexing.

540
00:36:41.000 --> 00:36:41.760
<v Speaker 2>It's a mystery to me.

541
00:36:41.880 --> 00:36:44.320
<v Speaker 4>But well, I do agree with slow transition because but

542
00:36:44.400 --> 00:36:46.760
<v Speaker 4>I see that slow transition happening within the first century.

543
00:36:46.800 --> 00:36:49.480
<v Speaker 4>And one element that's often missed that is actually stressed

544
00:36:49.519 --> 00:36:52.079
<v Speaker 4>in the Eastern Fathers is the destruction of the Temple.

545
00:36:52.199 --> 00:36:55.679
<v Speaker 4>So seventy eight D is pretty consistent in you know,

546
00:36:55.719 --> 00:36:59.000
<v Speaker 4>Saint John Christal sermons and so forth. Athletes just talks

547
00:36:59.039 --> 00:37:02.000
<v Speaker 4>about it. Origin even talked about the importance of seventy

548
00:37:02.039 --> 00:37:04.280
<v Speaker 4>a D. Because that was the fulfillment of Luke twenty

549
00:37:04.320 --> 00:37:07.719
<v Speaker 4>one in Matthew twenty four that Jesus tells the people

550
00:37:07.880 --> 00:37:10.159
<v Speaker 4>in front of him in Luke twenty one, when you

551
00:37:10.239 --> 00:37:12.960
<v Speaker 4>see the temple destroyed, know that that's the end of

552
00:37:13.159 --> 00:37:16.920
<v Speaker 4>that old administration. That is heaven and earth being rolled

553
00:37:17.000 --> 00:37:19.840
<v Speaker 4>up like a scroll that Hebrews talked about, because heaven

554
00:37:19.840 --> 00:37:22.920
<v Speaker 4>and earth are symbolized by the temple and its ministry,

555
00:37:23.199 --> 00:37:25.360
<v Speaker 4>and so a lot of people who don't know biblical

556
00:37:25.400 --> 00:37:27.679
<v Speaker 4>ex to Jesus and sort of the patterns of these

557
00:37:27.719 --> 00:37:30.800
<v Speaker 4>events and the abomination of desolation for example, which is

558
00:37:30.880 --> 00:37:33.559
<v Speaker 4>again seventy eight that you's talked about. If you don't

559
00:37:33.639 --> 00:37:36.559
<v Speaker 4>know that important event, you will miss his coming in

560
00:37:36.719 --> 00:37:40.440
<v Speaker 4>judgment that he talked about. That is the sign of

561
00:37:40.639 --> 00:37:44.239
<v Speaker 4>the end of the Old Covenant, and that's the divorce

562
00:37:44.440 --> 00:37:46.960
<v Speaker 4>of flesh Israel that the Book of Revelation is talking about.

563
00:37:47.320 --> 00:37:50.239
<v Speaker 4>So you're correct that in the Latin Church, Fathers I

564
00:37:50.360 --> 00:37:53.199
<v Speaker 4>think this is at least with Augustine and Jerome, and

565
00:37:53.239 --> 00:37:55.559
<v Speaker 4>I'm familiar with what you're talking about, Like they don't

566
00:37:55.639 --> 00:37:59.159
<v Speaker 4>typically place the seventy eight destruction as having much at

567
00:37:59.199 --> 00:38:02.239
<v Speaker 4>a redempth of his significance. I'm not sure exactly why

568
00:38:03.079 --> 00:38:06.280
<v Speaker 4>it is very emphasized amongst most of the important Eastern

569
00:38:06.360 --> 00:38:07.559
<v Speaker 4>Church fathers for whatever reason.

570
00:38:08.519 --> 00:38:10.840
<v Speaker 2>That's really interesting. I have to read more on what

571
00:38:10.920 --> 00:38:14.360
<v Speaker 2>they've said there. Okay, great, well, that was the Mosaic law.

572
00:38:14.400 --> 00:38:16.400
<v Speaker 13>I did have a question, since I'm here with you

573
00:38:16.719 --> 00:38:18.960
<v Speaker 13>on the Catholic stuff, if I could ask, unless you've got.

574
00:38:18.920 --> 00:38:19.639
<v Speaker 2>A hoop on.

575
00:38:21.280 --> 00:38:24.639
<v Speaker 13>No, it's overformed, dude, sweet sweet, Well, okay, so I

576
00:38:24.719 --> 00:38:27.440
<v Speaker 13>think you've made the claim before the argument of like, well,

577
00:38:28.239 --> 00:38:30.679
<v Speaker 13>why have any of these ecumenical councils of all you.

578
00:38:30.719 --> 00:38:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Need is a pope right where it kind of suggests

579
00:38:33.400 --> 00:38:33.880
<v Speaker 2>like there's.

580
00:38:33.800 --> 00:38:37.679
<v Speaker 13>A contradiction, right, Is that fair that the economical consoles

581
00:38:37.719 --> 00:38:40.239
<v Speaker 13>in some sense falsify the concept of the papacy.

582
00:38:42.480 --> 00:38:45.760
<v Speaker 4>The way that Vatican One frames the papacy makes the

583
00:38:45.840 --> 00:38:49.320
<v Speaker 4>first thousand years of Christianity seem absurd, a lot of

584
00:38:49.639 --> 00:38:52.719
<v Speaker 4>trouble over nothing, when literally, if they believed in the

585
00:38:52.800 --> 00:38:55.599
<v Speaker 4>Vatican One mindset of the papacy in the first thousand years,

586
00:38:56.360 --> 00:38:58.679
<v Speaker 4>then literally everyone could have just written to the pope

587
00:38:58.760 --> 00:39:02.440
<v Speaker 4>to have the issue settled. Fact Roman Catholic apologists, for example,

588
00:39:02.519 --> 00:39:05.079
<v Speaker 4>often will appeal to the letters of Clement as proof

589
00:39:05.599 --> 00:39:10.159
<v Speaker 4>that Clement, very many miles away from the problems in Corinth,

590
00:39:10.800 --> 00:39:14.440
<v Speaker 4>was quote settling the issues in Corinth. And my point

591
00:39:14.519 --> 00:39:16.440
<v Speaker 4>is that, Okay, so if that's the case, we're supposed

592
00:39:16.440 --> 00:39:19.400
<v Speaker 4>to read Clement's epistle on Vatican One way, then really

593
00:39:19.440 --> 00:39:22.199
<v Speaker 4>we wouldn't need any of these ecumenical councils all called

594
00:39:22.199 --> 00:39:27.119
<v Speaker 4>by emperors. Any dispute that, let's say the emperor is

595
00:39:27.199 --> 00:39:31.320
<v Speaker 4>aware of. You know, this is a empire wide dispute.

596
00:39:31.679 --> 00:39:35.800
<v Speaker 4>The emperor simply could have said, let's ask uh, Rome

597
00:39:36.440 --> 00:39:39.840
<v Speaker 4>case closed. Now, remember, you guys will take out of

598
00:39:39.920 --> 00:39:44.440
<v Speaker 4>context the phrase Rome has spoken cases closed. If that's

599
00:39:44.519 --> 00:39:48.000
<v Speaker 4>the Vatican One mindset, again, why have all this arguing

600
00:39:48.039 --> 00:39:50.199
<v Speaker 4>and disputing and debating and all these councils, why even

601
00:39:50.239 --> 00:39:54.400
<v Speaker 4>call these councils literally just letters of a request could

602
00:39:54.440 --> 00:39:55.719
<v Speaker 4>have been written to Rome. Yeah, I've made that.

603
00:39:55.760 --> 00:40:00.480
<v Speaker 13>Argument, got it, Okay, So I guess it's two questions, right,

604
00:40:00.480 --> 00:40:03.599
<v Speaker 13>because I'm wondering if what you think about these lines

605
00:40:03.639 --> 00:40:04.039
<v Speaker 13>of thoughts?

606
00:40:04.079 --> 00:40:07.480
<v Speaker 2>So right, So why have councils.

607
00:40:07.800 --> 00:40:09.639
<v Speaker 13>If you just have the pope maybe one to one

608
00:40:09.719 --> 00:40:12.199
<v Speaker 13>correspondence and the Pope just tells everyone here's how it's

609
00:40:12.199 --> 00:40:12.480
<v Speaker 13>going to be.

610
00:40:12.639 --> 00:40:16.079
<v Speaker 2>Right, do you do you find in any merit in this?

611
00:40:16.199 --> 00:40:18.280
<v Speaker 13>We're like, well, what like if we make a council here,

612
00:40:18.360 --> 00:40:20.559
<v Speaker 13>even if let's say hypothetically, if the.

613
00:40:20.559 --> 00:40:24.239
<v Speaker 2>Pope somehow had some quart of some sort of authority, it.

614
00:40:24.280 --> 00:40:27.239
<v Speaker 13>Gives opportunity for people to ask questions, understand how the

615
00:40:27.320 --> 00:40:30.199
<v Speaker 13>teaching reconciles, so they can have the open debate. And

616
00:40:30.440 --> 00:40:32.760
<v Speaker 13>it also forces all the leaders of the church to

617
00:40:33.239 --> 00:40:36.320
<v Speaker 13>show themselves in written statement, whether.

618
00:40:36.119 --> 00:40:36.960
<v Speaker 2>They're in a quart or not.

619
00:40:37.159 --> 00:40:39.000
<v Speaker 13>So in some sense, you force the council and you

620
00:40:39.039 --> 00:40:41.400
<v Speaker 13>can reveal who's the heretic and who's the orthodox.

621
00:40:41.960 --> 00:40:44.360
<v Speaker 4>Like do you think, well, I mean again, none of you,

622
00:40:44.880 --> 00:40:51.599
<v Speaker 4>none of that. But in the post first millennium Western mindset, again,

623
00:40:51.920 --> 00:40:55.400
<v Speaker 4>none of that's necessary because after the eleventh century, the

624
00:40:55.480 --> 00:40:58.679
<v Speaker 4>pope confirms every bishop in the world. The Pope decides

625
00:40:59.360 --> 00:41:02.599
<v Speaker 4>throughout the world old who's worthy of excommunication and who isn't. Ultimately,

626
00:41:03.079 --> 00:41:06.119
<v Speaker 4>so the very powers that are claimed and accorded to

627
00:41:06.239 --> 00:41:09.199
<v Speaker 4>the pope in the second millennium, and particularly a Vatican

628
00:41:09.280 --> 00:41:13.639
<v Speaker 4>One like again, ultimately this is this is raising the

629
00:41:13.719 --> 00:41:17.199
<v Speaker 4>question of was the Vatican One stuff in the mind

630
00:41:17.239 --> 00:41:19.639
<v Speaker 4>of the church in the first thousand years or not?

631
00:41:21.800 --> 00:41:24.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, right to your point. And I suppose the

632
00:41:24.480 --> 00:41:25.000
<v Speaker 2>difficult thing.

633
00:41:25.039 --> 00:41:27.119
<v Speaker 13>I mean, we can't even read each other's minds and

634
00:41:27.280 --> 00:41:28.880
<v Speaker 13>here we are in the present, but to try to

635
00:41:28.960 --> 00:41:29.960
<v Speaker 13>read the minds.

636
00:41:29.679 --> 00:41:32.039
<v Speaker 2>Of historical figures, of course there's going to be something.

637
00:41:32.079 --> 00:41:35.159
<v Speaker 4>Well, remember how difficult it is in the ancient world

638
00:41:35.320 --> 00:41:37.719
<v Speaker 4>to bring all these bishops throughout the empire to one

639
00:41:37.800 --> 00:41:41.599
<v Speaker 4>central city. I mean, that's a huge feat. It requires

640
00:41:41.639 --> 00:41:44.519
<v Speaker 4>a long time, it requires a lot of money. When

641
00:41:44.800 --> 00:41:47.480
<v Speaker 4>all we needed was just like a one letter sent

642
00:41:47.559 --> 00:41:50.280
<v Speaker 4>to the Bishop of Rome and his you know, sealable approval.

643
00:41:50.519 --> 00:41:52.039
<v Speaker 4>And by the way, couldn't the Bishop of Rome to

644
00:41:52.199 --> 00:41:54.559
<v Speaker 4>tell us who's a heretic and who's not? By the way,

645
00:41:54.559 --> 00:41:56.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, that's the Vatican One powers that he has.

646
00:41:56.400 --> 00:41:57.599
<v Speaker 4>Why can't why can't he do that?

647
00:41:58.480 --> 00:42:00.639
<v Speaker 13>Well, So that's interesting, and this is me thinking for

648
00:42:00.719 --> 00:42:02.599
<v Speaker 13>the first time, I haven't thought about what you're saying

649
00:42:02.639 --> 00:42:06.079
<v Speaker 13>here before. But I suppose, like okay, for example, like

650
00:42:06.159 --> 00:42:09.679
<v Speaker 13>capital punishment at least in the Catholic position has has migrated, right,

651
00:42:09.800 --> 00:42:11.960
<v Speaker 13>So why did the church flip flop? You could say, well,

652
00:42:12.440 --> 00:42:17.320
<v Speaker 13>before there was no adequate means to deal with the psychopaths,

653
00:42:17.400 --> 00:42:19.519
<v Speaker 13>you know, the dangerous people there were, there were no prisons,

654
00:42:19.559 --> 00:42:20.840
<v Speaker 13>so you just had to kill them. But now that

655
00:42:20.880 --> 00:42:23.679
<v Speaker 13>we have prisons, that's changed. Or like war, the concept

656
00:42:23.719 --> 00:42:26.159
<v Speaker 13>of a just war, Well, now we have nuclear bombs.

657
00:42:26.280 --> 00:42:28.239
<v Speaker 4>Well on, there were prisons in the ancient world. The

658
00:42:28.960 --> 00:42:30.880
<v Speaker 4>mosaic law mentions imprisoning somebody.

659
00:42:30.960 --> 00:42:34.079
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean, Uh, well, I.

660
00:42:34.119 --> 00:42:36.880
<v Speaker 13>Mean yeah, without getting too much into that point, I

661
00:42:36.960 --> 00:42:39.519
<v Speaker 13>mean the concept I think that you couldn't really have

662
00:42:39.599 --> 00:42:41.719
<v Speaker 13>a stable society with like mass you know.

663
00:42:41.760 --> 00:42:43.639
<v Speaker 2>Prisons at scale, like you just have to kind of

664
00:42:44.400 --> 00:42:45.440
<v Speaker 2>to It's.

665
00:42:45.639 --> 00:42:49.000
<v Speaker 13>Because you're balancing the good of letting the person have

666
00:42:49.039 --> 00:42:52.119
<v Speaker 13>an opportunity for redemption versus protecting society.

667
00:42:51.719 --> 00:42:52.559
<v Speaker 2>From the evil doer.

668
00:42:53.039 --> 00:42:55.239
<v Speaker 13>And you could argue that before you couldn't really contain

669
00:42:55.320 --> 00:42:57.199
<v Speaker 13>the evil doers, so it's better to just you know,

670
00:42:57.320 --> 00:42:57.679
<v Speaker 13>kill them.

671
00:42:57.760 --> 00:42:59.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, the problem with that, I understand that this is

672
00:42:59.800 --> 00:43:03.159
<v Speaker 4>an attempt at explaining why this position might evolve. But

673
00:43:03.719 --> 00:43:06.920
<v Speaker 4>the problem is that in traditional Catholic moral theology, and

674
00:43:07.000 --> 00:43:08.840
<v Speaker 4>I think even I'm going from memory here, but even

675
00:43:08.880 --> 00:43:12.360
<v Speaker 4>in the Council the Catechism of Trent, it argues that

676
00:43:12.639 --> 00:43:17.400
<v Speaker 4>the basis for the death penalty is natural justice. So

677
00:43:18.480 --> 00:43:21.320
<v Speaker 4>does I thought things in Rome Mecalay theology natural law?

678
00:43:21.320 --> 00:43:22.199
<v Speaker 4>How's that going to change?

679
00:43:24.039 --> 00:43:24.199
<v Speaker 7>Right?

680
00:43:24.280 --> 00:43:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, fair enough?

681
00:43:25.320 --> 00:43:26.800
<v Speaker 13>And yeah, I guess I don't mean to get too

682
00:43:26.880 --> 00:43:29.400
<v Speaker 13>much united into that. I'd have to circle back on

683
00:43:29.480 --> 00:43:31.719
<v Speaker 13>that point, but I guess if there is a certain

684
00:43:31.880 --> 00:43:37.000
<v Speaker 13>element of the fundamental nature of the times is somehow changed.

685
00:43:37.039 --> 00:43:39.719
<v Speaker 2>So you make an interesting point that, I mean.

686
00:43:39.679 --> 00:43:43.000
<v Speaker 13>Today you can communicate around the world in a millisecond.

687
00:43:43.039 --> 00:43:45.559
<v Speaker 13>I mean, we're doing it right now, and so having

688
00:43:45.599 --> 00:43:48.639
<v Speaker 13>a centralized structure and dissemination of information whatever, I mean,

689
00:43:48.679 --> 00:43:50.840
<v Speaker 13>that's that's not much of a problem. But back then,

690
00:43:51.039 --> 00:43:54.079
<v Speaker 13>like you couldn't really travel. I mean, it's really problematic.

691
00:43:54.159 --> 00:43:56.199
<v Speaker 4>So you're saying, but then that means you're admitting that

692
00:43:56.360 --> 00:43:58.920
<v Speaker 4>the Clement argument is not an argument for Aboutican one.

693
00:44:00.639 --> 00:44:03.880
<v Speaker 13>Oh I'm not even aware, Like I'm not even making

694
00:44:03.880 --> 00:44:05.679
<v Speaker 13>a claim. Y, I'm just literally explored.

695
00:44:05.719 --> 00:44:07.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to like grapple with the consequence.

696
00:44:08.280 --> 00:44:12.199
<v Speaker 4>I understand. But if that's the case, then the Clement

697
00:44:12.360 --> 00:44:15.679
<v Speaker 4>example is no longer an example for Vatican one papacy.

698
00:44:16.559 --> 00:44:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I see what you're saying. But coolly, I

699
00:44:20.440 --> 00:44:22.320
<v Speaker 2>gotta have to look more into the stuff that you

700
00:44:22.400 --> 00:44:22.840
<v Speaker 2>brought up.

701
00:44:22.920 --> 00:44:26.199
<v Speaker 4>But you know it's also I mean, are you are

702
00:44:26.239 --> 00:44:28.679
<v Speaker 4>you aware on this topic? Are you aware of the

703
00:44:29.320 --> 00:44:31.679
<v Speaker 4>Chidy document and the Alexandria document.

704
00:44:33.199 --> 00:44:33.599
<v Speaker 2>I am not.

705
00:44:34.880 --> 00:44:36.639
<v Speaker 4>So these are on the Vatican website. You can go

706
00:44:36.679 --> 00:44:40.360
<v Speaker 4>to Christianity dot christian Unity dot v A H and

707
00:44:40.599 --> 00:44:42.519
<v Speaker 4>you can look up the Chi eighty document and the

708
00:44:42.599 --> 00:44:47.079
<v Speaker 4>Alexandria document. Chady document says this is approved by the Vatican,

709
00:44:47.159 --> 00:44:51.559
<v Speaker 4>approved by Francis. It says, appeals regarding disciplinary matters in

710
00:44:51.920 --> 00:44:55.239
<v Speaker 4>the first some of the first millennium we're also made

711
00:44:55.280 --> 00:44:58.320
<v Speaker 4>to Constantinople and other SE's. So appeals are not just

712
00:44:58.400 --> 00:45:02.079
<v Speaker 4>made to Rome, always treated in a synodal way. So

713
00:45:02.440 --> 00:45:05.000
<v Speaker 4>in fact, this is admitting that anytime, even when there

714
00:45:05.079 --> 00:45:08.000
<v Speaker 4>was an appeal based on the Canons of Artica, this

715
00:45:08.239 --> 00:45:10.519
<v Speaker 4>was not a Rome speaks in cases close matter. It's

716
00:45:10.559 --> 00:45:14.119
<v Speaker 4>a let's retry. Let's have a retrial. Appeals to the

717
00:45:14.199 --> 00:45:16.920
<v Speaker 4>Bishop of Rome from the East expressed the communion of

718
00:45:16.960 --> 00:45:21.000
<v Speaker 4>the church, but the Bishop of Rome did not exercise

719
00:45:21.119 --> 00:45:24.480
<v Speaker 4>canonical authority over the churches of the East. This is

720
00:45:24.559 --> 00:45:27.920
<v Speaker 4>in direct contradiction to what Vatican One says about the

721
00:45:28.000 --> 00:45:31.000
<v Speaker 4>universal jurisdiction of the pope at all times. So I

722
00:45:31.039 --> 00:45:32.920
<v Speaker 4>would just say that your own Vatican, and not trying

723
00:45:32.960 --> 00:45:34.239
<v Speaker 4>to put you on the spot or be rude to you,

724
00:45:34.559 --> 00:45:37.119
<v Speaker 4>but your own Vatican, in its recent documents, has admitted

725
00:45:37.159 --> 00:45:41.039
<v Speaker 4>that this is something obviously that evolved. This whole idea

726
00:45:41.079 --> 00:45:43.719
<v Speaker 4>of the papacy evolved over time, and to me that's

727
00:45:43.760 --> 00:45:48.039
<v Speaker 4>another surrendering of Vatican One, because Vatican one claims, as

728
00:45:48.119 --> 00:45:50.880
<v Speaker 4>well as legal of the Thirteen that the powers and

729
00:45:50.960 --> 00:45:55.000
<v Speaker 4>prerogatives of the Bishop of Rome were always universally there

730
00:45:55.119 --> 00:45:56.679
<v Speaker 4>and known from the very first days.

731
00:45:58.159 --> 00:46:02.039
<v Speaker 13>So okay, this is me not familiar with the specifics

732
00:46:02.039 --> 00:46:03.679
<v Speaker 13>of what we pointed to, but just even what I

733
00:46:03.800 --> 00:46:07.400
<v Speaker 13>know now, would the Catholic response be that, sure, like

734
00:46:07.679 --> 00:46:10.880
<v Speaker 13>the Pope on different issues will seek that you know,

735
00:46:11.280 --> 00:46:15.639
<v Speaker 13>appeal process that'll be more collaborative. But then there's specific

736
00:46:15.760 --> 00:46:17.800
<v Speaker 13>times where the quote unquote. You know, the keys of

737
00:46:17.880 --> 00:46:20.719
<v Speaker 13>infallibility are wielded, and that's like so rare, and I

738
00:46:20.880 --> 00:46:23.480
<v Speaker 13>understand that might be a little unfalsifiable, like when was

739
00:46:23.519 --> 00:46:24.119
<v Speaker 13>it infallible?

740
00:46:24.159 --> 00:46:24.760
<v Speaker 2>When was it not?

741
00:46:25.440 --> 00:46:27.519
<v Speaker 13>But you know, is it fair to say that the

742
00:46:27.599 --> 00:46:30.880
<v Speaker 13>pope might might allow for certain issues to be more

743
00:46:31.000 --> 00:46:34.239
<v Speaker 13>collaborative and worked out as opposed to other issues where

744
00:46:34.280 --> 00:46:35.159
<v Speaker 13>the keys will be swung.

745
00:46:35.320 --> 00:46:38.440
<v Speaker 4>Let's say, Okay, maybe that's the case within Roman Catholicism,

746
00:46:38.519 --> 00:46:40.159
<v Speaker 4>that you can make that argument. But I'm making a

747
00:46:40.199 --> 00:46:44.360
<v Speaker 4>different argument, which is that there's a specific dogmatic contradiction

748
00:46:45.199 --> 00:46:49.320
<v Speaker 4>that Vatican One says everybody in all times, in all

749
00:46:49.360 --> 00:46:52.119
<v Speaker 4>places new from the earliest days that the Roman Sea

750
00:46:52.320 --> 00:46:58.679
<v Speaker 4>had universal jurisdiction, indefectibility and infallibility. That's contrary too, this

751
00:46:58.920 --> 00:47:03.159
<v Speaker 4>claim that saidmitted here that in the first millennium the

752
00:47:03.280 --> 00:47:06.480
<v Speaker 4>Church of Rome did not have universal jurisdiction. Both of

753
00:47:06.519 --> 00:47:08.000
<v Speaker 4>these things can't be true at the same time. That's

754
00:47:08.039 --> 00:47:10.639
<v Speaker 4>the area, got it?

755
00:47:10.760 --> 00:47:13.199
<v Speaker 2>Got it? Okay? Right?

756
00:47:13.239 --> 00:47:15.280
<v Speaker 13>Well, I gotta yeah, I'll look into this. I do

757
00:47:15.440 --> 00:47:18.119
<v Speaker 13>have to dive into the history. I will say that's

758
00:47:18.119 --> 00:47:20.679
<v Speaker 13>been on my to do list. But I guess if

759
00:47:20.679 --> 00:47:22.519
<v Speaker 13>I could ask one more question, because this is more

760
00:47:22.519 --> 00:47:27.239
<v Speaker 13>of just like a psychological of you know, Barrier Stumbach block.

761
00:47:27.280 --> 00:47:33.039
<v Speaker 13>But how would you succinctly capture the Orthodox view on sexuality?

762
00:47:33.079 --> 00:47:35.400
<v Speaker 13>Because let's say, you know, the Catholic Church has the

763
00:47:35.559 --> 00:47:39.039
<v Speaker 13>Theology of the Body, some pretty beautiful stuff on you know,

764
00:47:39.119 --> 00:47:41.559
<v Speaker 13>the nature of the sexuality, and it seems to me,

765
00:47:41.639 --> 00:47:44.719
<v Speaker 13>even on an issue of like contraception, I just don't

766
00:47:44.760 --> 00:47:46.599
<v Speaker 13>really understand what the Orthodox position is.

767
00:47:47.119 --> 00:47:49.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, it just seemed it just doesn't seem

768
00:47:49.840 --> 00:47:52.280
<v Speaker 2>as tight doctrinely when it comes to you know, matters

769
00:47:52.320 --> 00:47:55.719
<v Speaker 2>of sex. Am I like, am I missing something? Like?

770
00:47:55.960 --> 00:47:56.880
<v Speaker 2>How would you capture it?

771
00:47:56.920 --> 00:47:58.960
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, I would just say go to UBI Petris's

772
00:47:59.039 --> 00:48:01.800
<v Speaker 4>channel and watch the Inner View with doctor David Bradshaw

773
00:48:01.880 --> 00:48:05.239
<v Speaker 4>on sex, contraception, NFP Humana vite in Natural Law, and

774
00:48:05.320 --> 00:48:08.000
<v Speaker 4>then UBI has a separate documentary that he made on

775
00:48:08.719 --> 00:48:11.840
<v Speaker 4>marriage and divorce in the Orthodox view. But great questions,

776
00:48:11.880 --> 00:48:17.800
<v Speaker 4>Appreciate that, great conversation. Really enjoyed that. Uh it's it's

777
00:48:17.920 --> 00:48:22.079
<v Speaker 4>really good when we have a civil Roman Catholic who

778
00:48:22.079 --> 00:48:25.000
<v Speaker 4>doesn't just immediately scream and lose his mind. So thank

779
00:48:25.039 --> 00:48:38.239
<v Speaker 4>you for that. Grammy Winner. What's up man? What's up?

780
00:48:38.360 --> 00:48:38.519
<v Speaker 15>Hell?

781
00:48:39.039 --> 00:48:40.000
<v Speaker 8>Hi yo?

782
00:48:41.199 --> 00:48:42.199
<v Speaker 16>So I have a question.

783
00:48:43.400 --> 00:48:46.440
<v Speaker 2>I was recently reading the Books of X and the Church.

784
00:48:48.079 --> 00:48:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Your what I was reading the Book of X.

785
00:48:53.800 --> 00:48:57.159
<v Speaker 17>And the Church describing it is so different from the

786
00:48:57.280 --> 00:49:01.039
<v Speaker 17>althod of Church. I mean it looks simpler, most simple issue.

787
00:49:01.079 --> 00:49:04.880
<v Speaker 4>Want I think, hold on, I think you're running on

788
00:49:04.920 --> 00:49:06.800
<v Speaker 4>a lot of assumptions because it says there were many

789
00:49:06.880 --> 00:49:10.639
<v Speaker 4>lights that were there when they gather. That's the candles.

790
00:49:11.519 --> 00:49:14.280
<v Speaker 4>It talks about an altar in Hebrews thirteen, so Paul

791
00:49:14.360 --> 00:49:16.519
<v Speaker 4>talks about the Church and the Book of Acts having

792
00:49:16.559 --> 00:49:21.360
<v Speaker 4>an altar. So here's an altar, here's candles, there's robes,

793
00:49:21.519 --> 00:49:24.239
<v Speaker 4>there's relics. They take relics from Paul's body and drive

794
00:49:24.280 --> 00:49:26.239
<v Speaker 4>out spirits. I mean, these are all things that we

795
00:49:26.320 --> 00:49:28.480
<v Speaker 4>find in the Orthodox Church. So how where are you

796
00:49:28.559 --> 00:49:30.480
<v Speaker 4>getting this idea? It's not the same.

797
00:49:31.760 --> 00:49:34.800
<v Speaker 17>Well, when you read the book, I mean the description

798
00:49:35.039 --> 00:49:38.159
<v Speaker 17>of the church is like, I mean, it's kind of

799
00:49:38.280 --> 00:49:39.800
<v Speaker 17>different in a way.

800
00:49:40.480 --> 00:49:42.639
<v Speaker 4>I mean, if you read Paul's epistles, it's not different.

801
00:49:42.679 --> 00:49:45.079
<v Speaker 4>Because Paul says that the apostolic succession that he gave

802
00:49:45.119 --> 00:49:47.960
<v Speaker 4>to Timothy is based on the principles that you see

803
00:49:47.960 --> 00:49:50.719
<v Speaker 4>in numbers eleven. So numbers eleven. Moses lays his hands

804
00:49:50.719 --> 00:49:52.760
<v Speaker 4>and passes on the Holy Spirit. Paul says Timothy, I

805
00:49:52.880 --> 00:49:54.719
<v Speaker 4>light hands on you, passes the Holy Spirit too, men

806
00:49:54.840 --> 00:49:57.360
<v Speaker 4>after you. That's absolute succession. So that's also in the

807
00:49:57.400 --> 00:49:59.719
<v Speaker 4>Book of Acts. You can't take acts in isolation. There's

808
00:49:59.719 --> 00:50:00.760
<v Speaker 4>all the other passages.

809
00:50:01.719 --> 00:50:03.639
<v Speaker 2>But you talk about the relics of Paul.

810
00:50:04.960 --> 00:50:06.360
<v Speaker 4>Ax talks about the relics of Paul.

811
00:50:07.559 --> 00:50:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Does it really? Because, I mean, he's still alive.

812
00:50:10.239 --> 00:50:12.719
<v Speaker 17>So I don't know why we're talking about it in

813
00:50:12.800 --> 00:50:15.320
<v Speaker 17>the book that you know, was written when it was

814
00:50:15.360 --> 00:50:16.880
<v Speaker 17>still I'm living in this world.

815
00:50:16.920 --> 00:50:19.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean, a relic a holy man can heal people

816
00:50:19.840 --> 00:50:21.400
<v Speaker 4>when he's alive. He doesn't have to be dead. What

817
00:50:21.440 --> 00:50:22.119
<v Speaker 4>are you talking about?

818
00:50:23.320 --> 00:50:25.639
<v Speaker 2>Oh well, well, my my bad.

819
00:50:29.000 --> 00:50:32.960
<v Speaker 17>But when we talk about the saints, I mean, at

820
00:50:33.000 --> 00:50:35.639
<v Speaker 17>the time of Paul and all the orders, I mean,

821
00:50:35.760 --> 00:50:39.920
<v Speaker 17>there were the saints. So why doesn't anyone actually pray

822
00:50:40.239 --> 00:50:43.400
<v Speaker 17>saints in this You know, in the early Scriptures they do.

823
00:50:43.679 --> 00:50:47.159
<v Speaker 4>The Book of Revelation, Paul John seasoned Heaven in chapters

824
00:50:47.199 --> 00:50:51.320
<v Speaker 4>five through eight, and he talks to and presents the

825
00:50:51.559 --> 00:50:54.360
<v Speaker 4>martyrs in heaven interceding for the Church on earth.

826
00:50:55.760 --> 00:50:58.360
<v Speaker 17>I mean, this is not like your interpresation of what

827
00:50:58.760 --> 00:51:01.920
<v Speaker 17>the one should expect, what interpress interpretation?

828
00:51:02.119 --> 00:51:04.840
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, everybody has an interpretation, so that is that's a

829
00:51:04.920 --> 00:51:05.679
<v Speaker 4>meaningless statement.

830
00:51:07.719 --> 00:51:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Mh. Well it's not convincing. I mean, I want to.

831
00:51:10.760 --> 00:51:13.599
<v Speaker 4>Tell you that's a fallacy. So the fact that it's

832
00:51:13.639 --> 00:51:17.079
<v Speaker 4>not convincing doesn't mean it's not true. Yeah, I know, Well,

833
00:51:18.320 --> 00:51:20.440
<v Speaker 4>but I mean, are there are there are the saints

834
00:51:20.519 --> 00:51:22.360
<v Speaker 4>under the altar offering the prayers of the of the

835
00:51:22.440 --> 00:51:23.199
<v Speaker 4>Church on earth or not?

836
00:51:24.960 --> 00:51:26.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I wouldn't be able to.

837
00:51:26.199 --> 00:51:29.039
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. I mean it's you don't believe me.

838
00:51:29.159 --> 00:51:31.320
<v Speaker 4>I just that's what That's what John says the Book

839
00:51:31.320 --> 00:51:32.360
<v Speaker 4>of Revelation. You're not familiar with that.

840
00:51:33.440 --> 00:51:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, he talks about the prayers, but it doesn't say

841
00:51:36.800 --> 00:51:37.280
<v Speaker 2>yes it does.

842
00:51:39.079 --> 00:51:42.400
<v Speaker 17>Because you're you're using this to fit a narrative, I think,

843
00:51:43.440 --> 00:51:45.840
<v Speaker 17>and that's actually wrong because.

844
00:51:45.679 --> 00:51:48.039
<v Speaker 4>Okay, what does it actually say? Since you I mean

845
00:51:48.119 --> 00:51:49.920
<v Speaker 4>to say that I'm wrong. Pre suppose that you know

846
00:51:50.039 --> 00:51:51.559
<v Speaker 4>what the text says, So you tell me what the

847
00:51:51.679 --> 00:51:52.480
<v Speaker 4>text actually says.

848
00:51:53.199 --> 00:51:54.400
<v Speaker 2>If I remember he.

849
00:51:54.440 --> 00:51:58.920
<v Speaker 17>Talks about perfume and prayer of saints like being you know,

850
00:51:59.320 --> 00:52:00.159
<v Speaker 17>spilled some way.

851
00:52:00.199 --> 00:52:02.519
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, mention that perfume. What are you talking about?

852
00:52:04.119 --> 00:52:12.360
<v Speaker 2>That's what I read. It's sometimes but still I think

853
00:52:12.760 --> 00:52:13.280
<v Speaker 2>the way you.

854
00:52:13.400 --> 00:52:16.119
<v Speaker 4>Present well, you're saying that, but you're not telling me why.

855
00:52:16.239 --> 00:52:19.840
<v Speaker 4>You're just saying that. You're saying, oh, that's your interpretation. Well,

856
00:52:19.920 --> 00:52:25.199
<v Speaker 4>everybody has their interpretations. Everyone has an agenda. You think

857
00:52:25.239 --> 00:52:26.880
<v Speaker 4>that the people are neutral on this's what are you

858
00:52:26.920 --> 00:52:27.400
<v Speaker 4>talking about?

859
00:52:28.280 --> 00:52:31.119
<v Speaker 17>Well, I mean it should be should do agenda? Should

860
00:52:31.320 --> 00:52:33.119
<v Speaker 17>you know, feed the narrative of a god? And that's

861
00:52:33.159 --> 00:52:33.639
<v Speaker 17>your own.

862
00:52:36.559 --> 00:52:38.760
<v Speaker 4>And let me guess you have the agenda you have.

863
00:52:38.960 --> 00:52:40.920
<v Speaker 4>You have the agenda of God. You're the God, you're

864
00:52:40.960 --> 00:52:41.480
<v Speaker 4>the prophet.

865
00:52:42.360 --> 00:52:45.239
<v Speaker 2>I just I'm kind of figuring it out, you know,

866
00:52:45.320 --> 00:52:45.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry.

867
00:52:45.760 --> 00:52:48.320
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Well, the text says that they're underneath the altar

868
00:52:48.440 --> 00:52:51.079
<v Speaker 4>in heaven offering the prayers of the saints on earth.

869
00:52:51.239 --> 00:52:53.400
<v Speaker 4>That's what the text says. So you tell me, as

870
00:52:53.440 --> 00:52:55.840
<v Speaker 4>a Protestant, whether I'm making up a narrative.

871
00:52:56.800 --> 00:52:59.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but the prayers of the saint doesn't mean to

872
00:52:59.280 --> 00:52:59.920
<v Speaker 2>be out prayer.

873
00:53:00.639 --> 00:53:03.440
<v Speaker 4>It's the saints on earth. It says our prayers are

874
00:53:03.480 --> 00:53:07.039
<v Speaker 4>offered by the saints in heaven. Yes, it does say that.

875
00:53:07.119 --> 00:53:07.880
<v Speaker 4>What are you talking about?

876
00:53:08.840 --> 00:53:10.760
<v Speaker 2>No, he just talks about the prayer off the saints,

877
00:53:10.920 --> 00:53:12.119
<v Speaker 2>not the prayers.

878
00:53:12.079 --> 00:53:15.280
<v Speaker 4>They pray for the saints on earth for vengeance for them.

879
00:53:17.519 --> 00:53:21.719
<v Speaker 4>Yes it does, they say, God, they intercede for the

880
00:53:21.840 --> 00:53:24.679
<v Speaker 4>saints on earth for God to avenge their brothers on earth.

881
00:53:24.719 --> 00:53:29.159
<v Speaker 2>It says that, well, can you give me the text

882
00:53:29.400 --> 00:53:30.960
<v Speaker 2>or rat it afta please?

883
00:53:34.119 --> 00:53:45.840
<v Speaker 4>Yep, let me pull it up. Thank you, they cried

884
00:53:45.880 --> 00:53:48.639
<v Speaker 4>out with a loud voice. O Sovereign Lord, how long

885
00:53:48.719 --> 00:53:51.079
<v Speaker 4>until you judge and avenge our blood on those who

886
00:53:51.199 --> 00:53:52.119
<v Speaker 4>dwell on the earth.

887
00:53:56.639 --> 00:54:02.039
<v Speaker 17>Okay, which message is this? I'm just coming before after

888
00:54:02.440 --> 00:54:04.480
<v Speaker 17>the part about the bread off the saying.

889
00:54:04.360 --> 00:54:06.480
<v Speaker 4>It's Revelation six nine through eleven.

890
00:54:08.760 --> 00:54:10.760
<v Speaker 2>I see, well, I have a look at it, because

891
00:54:11.559 --> 00:54:12.960
<v Speaker 2>it's just really the whole thing.

892
00:54:12.920 --> 00:54:15.360
<v Speaker 17>Like it also looks church, because you can't really differentiate

893
00:54:15.440 --> 00:54:16.679
<v Speaker 17>yourself from because of the Church.

894
00:54:16.679 --> 00:54:18.920
<v Speaker 4>And so now so now you've tapped down so totally

895
00:54:19.000 --> 00:54:21.599
<v Speaker 4>changed the topic to differentiate from the Catholic Church. What

896
00:54:21.639 --> 00:54:22.280
<v Speaker 4>does that have to do with this?

897
00:54:23.079 --> 00:54:23.760
<v Speaker 2>So what is that?

898
00:54:23.840 --> 00:54:26.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you're changing the subject because.

899
00:54:26.159 --> 00:54:30.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to figure out what is the primitive Church?

900
00:54:32.280 --> 00:54:36.079
<v Speaker 4>Okay, and any any evidence that contradicts your Protestant idea

901
00:54:36.159 --> 00:54:38.079
<v Speaker 4>of the early Church you're throwing out and saying, it's

902
00:54:38.079 --> 00:54:40.880
<v Speaker 4>my interpretation. Do you have do you have an maybe

903
00:54:40.880 --> 00:54:42.159
<v Speaker 4>you have? Do you have a Protestant agenda?

904
00:54:43.039 --> 00:54:45.800
<v Speaker 2>No at all. I'm really upen to you understand. Just wants,

905
00:54:45.880 --> 00:54:47.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, to figure it out, that's all.

906
00:54:49.559 --> 00:54:54.079
<v Speaker 4>But part of understanding means being willing to give up

907
00:54:54.119 --> 00:54:56.159
<v Speaker 4>our presuppositions, and the fact that you think you don't

908
00:54:56.159 --> 00:54:58.079
<v Speaker 4>have any presubpositions is the root of the problem here.

909
00:54:58.159 --> 00:54:58.760
<v Speaker 4>Everyone does.

910
00:54:59.480 --> 00:55:02.880
<v Speaker 17>I am actually, I mean, I'm not trying to force

911
00:55:02.920 --> 00:55:04.239
<v Speaker 17>any idea upon you.

912
00:55:04.360 --> 00:55:06.679
<v Speaker 4>I'm just trying to well, I mean when I when

913
00:55:06.760 --> 00:55:08.960
<v Speaker 4>I give you the text, you suddenly say you can't

914
00:55:08.960 --> 00:55:11.360
<v Speaker 4>differentiate yourself from the Catholic Church. What does that have

915
00:55:11.440 --> 00:55:11.800
<v Speaker 4>to do with this?

916
00:55:13.119 --> 00:55:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Because they can the same things. I want to know

917
00:55:15.159 --> 00:55:18.519
<v Speaker 2>they can the same thing as you to be the

918
00:55:18.599 --> 00:55:19.960
<v Speaker 2>primitive Church, because.

919
00:55:19.719 --> 00:55:21.639
<v Speaker 4>That's a fallacy. The fact that they claim the same

920
00:55:21.679 --> 00:55:23.360
<v Speaker 4>thing as us has nothing to do with which one's

921
00:55:23.360 --> 00:55:24.800
<v Speaker 4>true or false? Do you don't do you know what

922
00:55:24.960 --> 00:55:25.639
<v Speaker 4>fallacies are?

923
00:55:26.440 --> 00:55:28.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I know, but you too claim this hame thing.

924
00:55:28.480 --> 00:55:29.840
<v Speaker 2>So how I was, No, we.

925
00:55:29.880 --> 00:55:33.000
<v Speaker 4>Don't what are you talking about? I mean, they claimed

926
00:55:33.000 --> 00:55:36.440
<v Speaker 4>that the Roman bishop was the universal, infallible, in defectible

927
00:55:36.480 --> 00:55:37.639
<v Speaker 4>head from the first days of the church.

928
00:55:37.719 --> 00:55:38.000
<v Speaker 15>We don't.

929
00:55:38.039 --> 00:55:41.920
<v Speaker 4>We don't claim that. I literally, I literally just argued

930
00:55:42.000 --> 00:55:44.639
<v Speaker 4>for thirty minutes of the guy before you text showing

931
00:55:44.679 --> 00:55:45.400
<v Speaker 4>that that's not the case.

932
00:55:46.360 --> 00:55:49.039
<v Speaker 2>Okay, By the way, can I give a couple more sure?

933
00:55:49.880 --> 00:55:53.719
<v Speaker 2>Thank you? Uh Job.

934
00:55:55.400 --> 00:55:59.920
<v Speaker 18>Says, if there shall be an angel speaking for him,

935
00:56:01.360 --> 00:56:04.480
<v Speaker 18>he shall mercy on him, and she shall say deliver him.

936
00:56:04.679 --> 00:56:08.400
<v Speaker 18>They may not go down to corruption. So obviously we

937
00:56:08.480 --> 00:56:13.000
<v Speaker 18>can petition angels. In the book of Tobit, when thou

938
00:56:13.119 --> 00:56:17.119
<v Speaker 18>didst prayed with tears, I archangel Raphael.

939
00:56:16.880 --> 00:56:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Offered the prayer to the Lord. So there's prayers to angels.

940
00:56:21.280 --> 00:56:24.159
<v Speaker 18>Saint John, another angel came and stood before the altar,

941
00:56:24.239 --> 00:56:26.159
<v Speaker 18>having a golden censer, and there was given to him

942
00:56:26.199 --> 00:56:28.920
<v Speaker 18>much incense that he should offer of the prayers of

943
00:56:29.039 --> 00:56:32.440
<v Speaker 18>all the saints upon the golden altar, which is before

944
00:56:32.480 --> 00:56:33.760
<v Speaker 18>the throne of guard God.

945
00:56:34.519 --> 00:56:37.039
<v Speaker 2>So he clearly see that.

946
00:56:38.599 --> 00:56:41.599
<v Speaker 18>Prayers and petitions can be made to the angels. And

947
00:56:41.920 --> 00:56:44.599
<v Speaker 18>that's all the scripture, right there and then offer it

948
00:56:44.679 --> 00:56:46.800
<v Speaker 18>up to God. But if you want to know that

949
00:56:46.960 --> 00:56:49.840
<v Speaker 18>the early primitive Church, we have Saint Cyprian of Carthage,

950
00:56:49.880 --> 00:56:52.360
<v Speaker 18>Saint Hilary of Boteers sat from the Syrian.

951
00:56:52.840 --> 00:56:55.199
<v Speaker 2>These are all the third fourth.

952
00:56:55.079 --> 00:56:59.320
<v Speaker 18>Centuries, Saint Anthonatius the Great, fourth century, Saint Basil the Gray.

953
00:57:00.559 --> 00:57:02.960
<v Speaker 18>It's in the liturgy of Saint Basil, one of the

954
00:57:03.000 --> 00:57:08.000
<v Speaker 18>earliest liturgies. Saint Cyril, Jerusalem, Saint Gregory the Theologian, all

955
00:57:08.199 --> 00:57:11.360
<v Speaker 18>say the early Church, and it commands you to pray

956
00:57:11.719 --> 00:57:16.159
<v Speaker 18>to saints. So you don't see this, don't pray to

957
00:57:16.239 --> 00:57:19.159
<v Speaker 18>saints until what fifteen hundred years later. So if you're

958
00:57:19.199 --> 00:57:21.639
<v Speaker 18>looking for the primitive Church, it's right there, and they

959
00:57:21.679 --> 00:57:27.800
<v Speaker 18>pray the saints, both in scripture and all the earliest fathers.

960
00:57:30.199 --> 00:57:32.239
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to read you Revelation eight. When he opened

961
00:57:32.280 --> 00:57:34.119
<v Speaker 4>the seventh Seal, there was silence in heaven. I saw

962
00:57:34.199 --> 00:57:36.320
<v Speaker 4>the angels who said before God, and to them were

963
00:57:36.320 --> 00:57:38.760
<v Speaker 4>given seven trumpet's. Another angel. How any golden censer came

964
00:57:39.079 --> 00:57:41.039
<v Speaker 4>stood of the altar. He was given incense that he

965
00:57:41.079 --> 00:57:45.079
<v Speaker 4>should offer it with the prayers of the saints upon

966
00:57:45.280 --> 00:57:48.360
<v Speaker 4>the golden altar, which was before the throne. So this

967
00:57:48.559 --> 00:57:52.039
<v Speaker 4>is an angel in the heavenly liturgy, offering the prayers

968
00:57:52.079 --> 00:57:53.039
<v Speaker 4>of the saints before God.

969
00:57:58.119 --> 00:58:00.239
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I see what I just see. You know better

970
00:58:00.280 --> 00:58:05.719
<v Speaker 2>than me. That's Ben the noble. And I'm really trying

971
00:58:05.840 --> 00:58:07.159
<v Speaker 2>to because I felt like.

972
00:58:09.840 --> 00:58:15.119
<v Speaker 17>We can't really know what happened after the difficult death death.

973
00:58:15.920 --> 00:58:18.119
<v Speaker 4>So well, how do you know that we have We

974
00:58:18.239 --> 00:58:21.440
<v Speaker 4>have a multitudes of writings of the post Apostolic fathers

975
00:58:22.039 --> 00:58:28.960
<v Speaker 4>ignacious uh Clement, uh Cyprian. I mean you're an as polycarp.

976
00:58:29.039 --> 00:58:30.000
<v Speaker 4>What do you mean we can't know?

977
00:58:30.719 --> 00:58:33.599
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yes, we have done. But like I said,

978
00:58:33.800 --> 00:58:34.719
<v Speaker 2>they have an agenda.

979
00:58:35.320 --> 00:58:38.320
<v Speaker 4>Well that's your again, that's your presupposition. You're you're saying

980
00:58:38.320 --> 00:58:40.920
<v Speaker 4>to have an agenda when it disagrees with your interpretation.

981
00:58:41.320 --> 00:58:43.840
<v Speaker 2>And why not just say the apostles have an agenda?

982
00:58:44.119 --> 00:58:46.320
<v Speaker 2>So anything, I don't like that the apostles wrote it's

983
00:58:46.320 --> 00:58:52.400
<v Speaker 2>an agenda, because what if they will close up to

984
00:58:52.480 --> 00:58:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Jesus and they lived with him.

985
00:58:53.840 --> 00:58:59.960
<v Speaker 18>So of course, Alsoiousious was writing under the authority of apostles,

986
00:59:00.079 --> 00:59:02.079
<v Speaker 18>in which they would have said you can't write that.

987
00:59:03.039 --> 00:59:06.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, on what basis do you cut off Ignatius.

988
00:59:08.039 --> 00:59:11.079
<v Speaker 2>Because he was not about of the droop.

989
00:59:11.400 --> 00:59:12.519
<v Speaker 15>I mean what.

990
00:59:14.199 --> 00:59:17.000
<v Speaker 17>He was not about off the drowp I'm talking about

991
00:59:17.039 --> 00:59:18.000
<v Speaker 17>those part of the.

992
00:59:18.440 --> 00:59:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Jube, the group of the above Jesus.

993
00:59:22.039 --> 00:59:25.679
<v Speaker 4>Okay, what well, Paul says to Timothy that lay hands

994
00:59:25.719 --> 00:59:28.119
<v Speaker 4>on men after you because the Holy Spirit is given.

995
00:59:28.360 --> 00:59:31.119
<v Speaker 4>So did the Holy Spirit die when Paul told Timbery

996
00:59:31.119 --> 00:59:32.159
<v Speaker 4>to start laying hands on men?

997
00:59:33.119 --> 00:59:36.920
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, but actually Poe met with the others and your

998
00:59:37.320 --> 00:59:39.719
<v Speaker 17>saints I don't know who they all didn't.

999
00:59:40.079 --> 00:59:42.719
<v Speaker 4>Meant, what are you talking about? You have no idea.

1000
00:59:44.199 --> 00:59:46.440
<v Speaker 2>He was taught by Christ from the Apostles? What are you?

1001
00:59:47.239 --> 00:59:48.920
<v Speaker 2>He's the first second century scene.

1002
00:59:51.239 --> 00:59:53.320
<v Speaker 18>A lot of these were the ones that we're mentioning

1003
00:59:53.760 --> 00:59:55.519
<v Speaker 18>Polycarp Barnabys.

1004
00:59:56.800 --> 01:00:00.039
<v Speaker 2>They're always they were all writing under the authority.

1005
00:59:59.679 --> 01:00:01.679
<v Speaker 4>Of the Are you like a Seventh day Adventist or

1006
01:00:01.719 --> 01:00:04.480
<v Speaker 4>some kind of like assumption here that like after the Apostle,

1007
01:00:04.519 --> 01:00:07.159
<v Speaker 4>when when the Apostles died, then suddenly there's this apostas

1008
01:00:07.199 --> 01:00:09.800
<v Speaker 4>here like a job's witness. What you're you're coming from?

1009
01:00:09.880 --> 01:00:10.880
<v Speaker 4>Something like that? I can tell.

1010
01:00:11.159 --> 01:00:13.199
<v Speaker 2>I'm just trying to use critical thinking because.

1011
01:00:13.280 --> 01:00:15.639
<v Speaker 4>What's your background? Though, because it's not just critical thinking.

1012
01:00:15.719 --> 01:00:18.159
<v Speaker 4>It's some indoctrination from some dumb cult. What is it

1013
01:00:19.000 --> 01:00:23.440
<v Speaker 4>any Really, you're repeating what a lot of cults say.

1014
01:00:23.519 --> 01:00:28.199
<v Speaker 4>Where did you get this information? Yes, you are, Come on,

1015
01:00:28.440 --> 01:00:32.119
<v Speaker 4>be honest. No, I'm not okay, Well you got this

1016
01:00:32.239 --> 01:00:34.079
<v Speaker 4>information from somewhere. You didn't just sit down and read

1017
01:00:34.079 --> 01:00:38.519
<v Speaker 4>the Bible and suddenly decide that Ignacious was an apostle. No,

1018
01:00:38.719 --> 01:00:38.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm not.

1019
01:00:39.079 --> 01:00:39.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying that.

1020
01:00:39.840 --> 01:00:42.599
<v Speaker 17>I'm saying that you did say that I can't retely

1021
01:00:42.679 --> 01:00:44.880
<v Speaker 17>trust them because they have an agenda.

1022
01:00:45.119 --> 01:00:47.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's again, how do you know that? Where

1023
01:00:47.960 --> 01:00:49.840
<v Speaker 4>did you come to the conclusion that they have an agenda?

1024
01:00:49.880 --> 01:00:50.920
<v Speaker 4>Where did you get this information?

1025
01:00:51.960 --> 01:00:57.360
<v Speaker 17>Because they tend to go sam rude as Cazaric churge

1026
01:00:57.960 --> 01:00:58.320
<v Speaker 17>and I don't know.

1027
01:00:58.800 --> 01:01:01.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean maybe the Orthodox the Catholic are correct. How

1028
01:01:01.400 --> 01:01:02.760
<v Speaker 4>do you know How do you know they're not correct?

1029
01:01:05.000 --> 01:01:07.559
<v Speaker 2>I mean they maybe.

1030
01:01:07.599 --> 01:01:09.119
<v Speaker 4>Oh, maybe you're talking to a demon. How do you

1031
01:01:09.159 --> 01:01:09.880
<v Speaker 4>know it's holy spirit?

1032
01:01:11.360 --> 01:01:17.039
<v Speaker 2>Well that's I'm sure, okay, But anyways.

1033
01:01:18.239 --> 01:01:21.000
<v Speaker 4>DU's got Beyonce on his profile. This guy's troll. He's

1034
01:01:21.000 --> 01:01:28.840
<v Speaker 4>probably trolling Ken Chin. What's up? Prema Scripture will call

1035
01:01:28.920 --> 01:01:33.920
<v Speaker 4>in dude, what are you talking about? Defining cold? Call

1036
01:01:34.039 --> 01:01:39.760
<v Speaker 4>in and I will define call for you. Ruh. We

1037
01:01:39.800 --> 01:01:41.920
<v Speaker 4>should have got it. Sounds like he's just repeating seven

1038
01:01:41.960 --> 01:01:45.599
<v Speaker 4>day having and stuff. What's up, man, I'm mute?

1039
01:01:47.440 --> 01:01:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh Hellotle, Gary? Oh Hey, how you doing? Jack?

1040
01:01:53.199 --> 01:01:54.119
<v Speaker 4>Good? What what's up?

1041
01:01:54.679 --> 01:01:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay? Awesome? Just making sure I was all set up

1042
01:01:56.920 --> 01:01:57.559
<v Speaker 2>and good. Yeah.

1043
01:01:57.599 --> 01:02:00.280
<v Speaker 19>So I said a question about the final authority any

1044
01:02:00.599 --> 01:02:02.559
<v Speaker 19>Orthodoxy would you be able to address up for me?

1045
01:02:02.719 --> 01:02:02.920
<v Speaker 4>Sure?

1046
01:02:05.039 --> 01:02:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yes, I generally want to know what it is.

1047
01:02:07.079 --> 01:02:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Is it the equamentum, councils, is it the bishops?

1048
01:02:10.679 --> 01:02:10.840
<v Speaker 15>Yes?

1049
01:02:11.039 --> 01:02:11.599
<v Speaker 2>What is it?

1050
01:02:11.679 --> 01:02:13.400
<v Speaker 4>And what is your position?

1051
01:02:14.440 --> 01:02:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? You Reform Calvinists, okay.

1052
01:02:18.119 --> 01:02:21.039
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we would agree that the final authority at the

1053
01:02:21.119 --> 01:02:23.119
<v Speaker 4>end of the day is the Holy Spirit. So every

1054
01:02:23.199 --> 01:02:27.039
<v Speaker 4>Roman Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant agrees that for the individual,

1055
01:02:27.639 --> 01:02:30.079
<v Speaker 4>the final authority is going to be the Holy Spirit

1056
01:02:30.199 --> 01:02:33.199
<v Speaker 4>revealing what's true or false. But where we disagree with

1057
01:02:33.679 --> 01:02:36.360
<v Speaker 4>the reform person and with the Roman Catholic is the

1058
01:02:36.440 --> 01:02:38.840
<v Speaker 4>means that the Holy Spirit uses. So we do not

1059
01:02:39.000 --> 01:02:42.239
<v Speaker 4>believe that it is primarily just you and the scriptures,

1060
01:02:42.480 --> 01:02:44.280
<v Speaker 4>and we do not believe that it is primarily just

1061
01:02:44.880 --> 01:02:47.880
<v Speaker 4>the Holy Spirit so called and the Pope. We would

1062
01:02:47.920 --> 01:02:51.079
<v Speaker 4>say that there's a combination of things working together and

1063
01:02:51.119 --> 01:02:54.159
<v Speaker 4>there's not one magisterial thing that we would point to.

1064
01:02:54.679 --> 01:02:57.239
<v Speaker 4>But where we would bit different with you more particularly,

1065
01:02:57.360 --> 01:03:01.000
<v Speaker 4>is that Jesus did establish a normative authority for the church,

1066
01:03:01.400 --> 01:03:04.320
<v Speaker 4>and your group does not believe in any normative, existing

1067
01:03:04.440 --> 01:03:06.679
<v Speaker 4>historical authority. So that refutes your whole position.

1068
01:03:07.559 --> 01:03:09.400
<v Speaker 19>Well, sure, so let's just go to you said the

1069
01:03:09.440 --> 01:03:12.239
<v Speaker 19>Holy spirits the ultimate authority. So you're saying that everything

1070
01:03:12.360 --> 01:03:14.960
<v Speaker 19>that's that would be given a scripture would essentially the

1071
01:03:15.039 --> 01:03:17.239
<v Speaker 19>Holy Spirit would guide us and give us a correct

1072
01:03:17.239 --> 01:03:18.840
<v Speaker 19>interpretation that the correct path.

1073
01:03:18.679 --> 01:03:21.639
<v Speaker 4>To go down to, not just the scripture, not just

1074
01:03:21.679 --> 01:03:23.280
<v Speaker 4>the scripture, also the oral tradition.

1075
01:03:24.559 --> 01:03:26.000
<v Speaker 2>And where's the ord tradition found.

1076
01:03:26.760 --> 01:03:29.320
<v Speaker 4>It's found in the oral teaching, an interpretation hermenoneudicts of

1077
01:03:29.320 --> 01:03:31.440
<v Speaker 4>the traditional apostles, and it's found in places like the

1078
01:03:31.519 --> 01:03:32.480
<v Speaker 4>liturgy for example.

1079
01:03:33.840 --> 01:03:35.800
<v Speaker 2>So like like, what what is the greatest thing I

1080
01:03:35.840 --> 01:03:37.760
<v Speaker 2>guess in the or tradition that you're you would refer

1081
01:03:37.840 --> 01:03:38.039
<v Speaker 2>to the.

1082
01:03:40.320 --> 01:03:42.920
<v Speaker 19>Liturgy, so are you? But it doesn't everything that's in

1083
01:03:43.039 --> 01:03:46.719
<v Speaker 19>the liturgy. Echo would say the Bible. No, like what

1084
01:03:46.880 --> 01:03:49.000
<v Speaker 19>the what would be absent though, if you have.

1085
01:03:48.960 --> 01:03:51.320
<v Speaker 4>Anything the liturgical service itself.

1086
01:03:52.440 --> 01:03:54.360
<v Speaker 2>M hm. So without that's that.

1087
01:03:54.519 --> 01:03:56.920
<v Speaker 19>That sort of or tradition you would say, that's missing

1088
01:03:57.000 --> 01:03:58.199
<v Speaker 19>something critical in worship.

1089
01:03:58.679 --> 01:04:01.159
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we're in the New Testament. Did the apostles give

1090
01:04:01.159 --> 01:04:02.559
<v Speaker 4>you a liturgical worship service?

1091
01:04:04.039 --> 01:04:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, it sounds like it's not something that needs to.

1092
01:04:06.360 --> 01:04:11.880
<v Speaker 4>Be particularly interesting. So in Leviticus Native and Vai who

1093
01:04:11.920 --> 01:04:16.519
<v Speaker 4>are put to death for misappropriating the implements of worship.

1094
01:04:16.639 --> 01:04:19.000
<v Speaker 4>But in the reform mindset, I thought you guys believed

1095
01:04:19.000 --> 01:04:20.239
<v Speaker 4>in the regular principal worship?

1096
01:04:22.159 --> 01:04:25.000
<v Speaker 2>What would that be or would you find that as I.

1097
01:04:25.039 --> 01:04:27.679
<v Speaker 4>Mean, you don't know your own traditions definition of the regulars.

1098
01:04:28.400 --> 01:04:29.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know by that term.

1099
01:04:31.159 --> 01:04:34.239
<v Speaker 4>It's literally one of the one of the most famous

1100
01:04:34.480 --> 01:04:36.840
<v Speaker 4>terms in the history of reform theology. You've never heard

1101
01:04:36.840 --> 01:04:39.960
<v Speaker 4>of the regular prince of worship? No, no, I'm asking

1102
01:04:40.000 --> 01:04:42.599
<v Speaker 4>you if you Cashew well, I want you to in

1103
01:04:42.679 --> 01:04:45.199
<v Speaker 4>your reformed you are here to debate. You don't know

1104
01:04:45.360 --> 01:04:46.519
<v Speaker 4>this term from your tradition.

1105
01:04:47.280 --> 01:04:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I told you.

1106
01:04:49.320 --> 01:04:51.599
<v Speaker 4>Okay, stop playing dumb and be honest.

1107
01:04:52.320 --> 01:04:55.360
<v Speaker 2>No, I whatever it is in that that sort of

1108
01:04:55.440 --> 01:04:57.360
<v Speaker 2>category of the name you named it as.

1109
01:04:57.360 --> 01:04:59.000
<v Speaker 4>Maybe do you think I made that up?

1110
01:05:00.119 --> 01:05:01.639
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm not saying I'm not saying that. No.

1111
01:05:01.760 --> 01:05:03.920
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So how reformed are you?

1112
01:05:04.079 --> 01:05:04.119
<v Speaker 2>Like?

1113
01:05:04.599 --> 01:05:05.199
<v Speaker 4>Is this new to you?

1114
01:05:05.400 --> 01:05:08.079
<v Speaker 2>Or have you been this six caist what I've been

1115
01:05:08.639 --> 01:05:09.800
<v Speaker 2>of a six point Calvinist?

1116
01:05:11.559 --> 01:05:13.400
<v Speaker 4>How long have you been reformed? That's what I asked?

1117
01:05:14.280 --> 01:05:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh for three years? Not maybe about three or four

1118
01:05:15.880 --> 01:05:16.039
<v Speaker 2>of you.

1119
01:05:16.239 --> 01:05:18.719
<v Speaker 4>Okay, And you don't know about the regular principal worship?

1120
01:05:19.960 --> 01:05:21.639
<v Speaker 2>No, No, I mean I wouldn't.

1121
01:05:22.159 --> 01:05:27.199
<v Speaker 4>Do you follow the Westminster Confession? Yes, okay, this is

1122
01:05:27.280 --> 01:05:31.480
<v Speaker 4>a pretty well known thing from the Westminster Confession? Do

1123
01:05:31.559 --> 01:05:33.559
<v Speaker 4>you follow the original west mister? Maybe you follow some

1124
01:05:33.960 --> 01:05:35.119
<v Speaker 4>edited version or something.

1125
01:05:36.039 --> 01:05:38.559
<v Speaker 19>Well, I mean most of the people that I would

1126
01:05:38.719 --> 01:05:40.800
<v Speaker 19>prescribe to as good teachers and stuff like that, do

1127
01:05:41.440 --> 01:05:44.280
<v Speaker 19>I think the London Baptism Confession is what most churches

1128
01:05:44.320 --> 01:05:45.800
<v Speaker 19>that I would associate.

1129
01:05:45.320 --> 01:05:46.320
<v Speaker 2>With would follow.

1130
01:05:46.800 --> 01:05:49.639
<v Speaker 4>Okay, that's not the So you're a reform Baptist, not

1131
01:05:49.719 --> 01:05:52.199
<v Speaker 4>a Presbyterian, So that's not the original Westminster Confession?

1132
01:05:53.599 --> 01:05:57.239
<v Speaker 2>Okay? Yeah, yeah, But but I mean.

1133
01:05:57.760 --> 01:05:59.559
<v Speaker 4>And what is the sixth point of Calvinism?

1134
01:05:59.760 --> 01:06:02.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm never heard of this stool Upso the sovereignty of God.

1135
01:06:05.079 --> 01:06:06.719
<v Speaker 4>It's five points, what's the sixth?

1136
01:06:06.920 --> 01:06:09.000
<v Speaker 2>I know this is what James White would say, is

1137
01:06:09.159 --> 01:06:10.599
<v Speaker 2>the extraditions to.

1138
01:06:11.639 --> 01:06:13.559
<v Speaker 4>So you're trolling as a reform Protestant.

1139
01:06:14.000 --> 01:06:19.159
<v Speaker 2>No I am A I am. I just don't get

1140
01:06:19.199 --> 01:06:19.960
<v Speaker 2>what you think I'd.

1141
01:06:19.800 --> 01:06:24.280
<v Speaker 4>Controlling because you're you're you're deflecting and not being clear

1142
01:06:24.360 --> 01:06:27.159
<v Speaker 4>about what your position is. So you said you're reformed,

1143
01:06:27.199 --> 01:06:29.239
<v Speaker 4>and then you said six point Calvinism, but you've never

1144
01:06:29.320 --> 01:06:30.559
<v Speaker 4>heard the regular principal worship.

1145
01:06:30.599 --> 01:06:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Even though this is like, let's not let's not get

1146
01:06:33.400 --> 01:06:35.119
<v Speaker 2>let's get stuck in that. I like to talk to

1147
01:06:35.119 --> 01:06:36.159
<v Speaker 2>you about final authorities.

1148
01:06:36.519 --> 01:06:39.159
<v Speaker 4>If you would be really well, I mean, this is

1149
01:06:39.199 --> 01:06:42.440
<v Speaker 4>going to matter because like the point that I'm making

1150
01:06:42.679 --> 01:06:45.719
<v Speaker 4>is that if your tradition is going, if you want

1151
01:06:45.719 --> 01:06:47.440
<v Speaker 4>to be consistent with your tradition, and I'm sure you

1152
01:06:47.519 --> 01:06:50.199
<v Speaker 4>don't care because in you guys' position, you can disagree

1153
01:06:50.239 --> 01:06:53.519
<v Speaker 4>with the generation right before you, uh, then you would

1154
01:06:53.519 --> 01:06:55.719
<v Speaker 4>think that God, if you would think that God, who

1155
01:06:55.760 --> 01:06:57.800
<v Speaker 4>cares so much about his worship in the Book of

1156
01:06:58.079 --> 01:06:59.920
<v Speaker 4>Leviticus that he would kill people for doing it wrong,

1157
01:07:00.320 --> 01:07:02.199
<v Speaker 4>would have given the New Testament Church a pattern of

1158
01:07:02.239 --> 01:07:04.440
<v Speaker 4>worship Yeah, I'm just.

1159
01:07:04.480 --> 01:07:06.199
<v Speaker 2>Confused how you can take that out of context in

1160
01:07:06.239 --> 01:07:07.480
<v Speaker 2>the Old Testament implying that to.

1161
01:07:07.599 --> 01:07:10.639
<v Speaker 4>Anything, because your entire tradition that you don't even know

1162
01:07:11.400 --> 01:07:15.079
<v Speaker 4>always has done that. So what was an example of

1163
01:07:15.519 --> 01:07:19.039
<v Speaker 4>the regulative principle of worship in the entire Reform tradition?

1164
01:07:19.199 --> 01:07:20.360
<v Speaker 4>That's the example.

1165
01:07:21.599 --> 01:07:21.880
<v Speaker 2>You got.

1166
01:07:22.280 --> 01:07:24.679
<v Speaker 4>You guys killed each other. You guys killed each other

1167
01:07:24.760 --> 01:07:25.880
<v Speaker 4>over this. You don't even know that.

1168
01:07:27.119 --> 01:07:29.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's relevance to No, it's not.

1169
01:07:30.599 --> 01:07:32.760
<v Speaker 4>No, it's not because you're part of a tradition that

1170
01:07:32.840 --> 01:07:35.760
<v Speaker 4>you can at whim disregard and say I don't care.

1171
01:07:35.800 --> 01:07:38.559
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't matter when the argument is about whether there's

1172
01:07:38.559 --> 01:07:41.159
<v Speaker 4>apostolic tradition that's liturgy or not. That's my point.

1173
01:07:41.679 --> 01:07:44.239
<v Speaker 19>I'm saying that the God's word that He's given us

1174
01:07:44.559 --> 01:07:46.760
<v Speaker 19>is what we need to do, what we need to

1175
01:07:46.840 --> 01:07:47.360
<v Speaker 19>have in mind.

1176
01:07:48.119 --> 01:07:51.079
<v Speaker 4>Okay, why didn't God? Because God cares so much about worship,

1177
01:07:51.119 --> 01:07:53.559
<v Speaker 4>and your own tradition has debated and killed each other

1178
01:07:53.679 --> 01:07:56.440
<v Speaker 4>over this, why didn't he provide a liturgy in the

1179
01:07:56.440 --> 01:07:56.960
<v Speaker 4>New Testament?

1180
01:07:57.679 --> 01:08:00.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the way he worships lay down to the fundamental No,

1181
01:08:00.280 --> 01:08:00.519
<v Speaker 2>it's not.

1182
01:08:01.079 --> 01:08:05.159
<v Speaker 4>No, it's not Where is there where is the liturgy

1183
01:08:05.159 --> 01:08:05.920
<v Speaker 4>in the New Testament?

1184
01:08:06.519 --> 01:08:07.960
<v Speaker 2>The concepts are there? What are you talking?

1185
01:08:08.079 --> 01:08:11.199
<v Speaker 4>The concepts are there, the liturgy itself is not there.

1186
01:08:12.079 --> 01:08:18.159
<v Speaker 19>So where does that come from? Where's your preset position

1187
01:08:18.239 --> 01:08:19.960
<v Speaker 19>that liturgy is even coming from?

1188
01:08:20.960 --> 01:08:24.680
<v Speaker 4>Because God kills people over this principle, and he consistently

1189
01:08:24.760 --> 01:08:26.560
<v Speaker 4>kills people over this principle. Because Paul says that if

1190
01:08:26.600 --> 01:08:29.199
<v Speaker 4>you eat and drink unworthily, God will kill you, so

1191
01:08:29.279 --> 01:08:31.760
<v Speaker 4>it would seem pretty important, and it's something that God

1192
01:08:31.840 --> 01:08:33.000
<v Speaker 4>didn't put in the written texts.

1193
01:08:34.199 --> 01:08:36.319
<v Speaker 2>So because you're saying God kills.

1194
01:08:36.119 --> 01:08:39.600
<v Speaker 4>People, who do you have to restate my argument? And

1195
01:08:39.720 --> 01:08:41.680
<v Speaker 4>you can't hear the argument. You have to repeat everything

1196
01:08:41.720 --> 01:08:42.079
<v Speaker 4>else said.

1197
01:08:42.600 --> 01:08:48.119
<v Speaker 2>I make sure I understood it right, So I just

1198
01:08:48.159 --> 01:08:48.760
<v Speaker 2>confuse how that.

1199
01:08:50.359 --> 01:08:52.600
<v Speaker 4>It's trying. How everyone else can understand this argument, but

1200
01:08:52.720 --> 01:08:56.119
<v Speaker 4>you're confused over it? Why is that funny?

1201
01:08:57.079 --> 01:08:59.119
<v Speaker 2>I thought that was a random point to bring up,

1202
01:08:59.159 --> 01:09:01.039
<v Speaker 2>But well, why do you have to.

1203
01:09:01.079 --> 01:09:03.199
<v Speaker 4>Keep repeating everything I say? Do you have a low

1204
01:09:03.279 --> 01:09:04.439
<v Speaker 4>IQ or are you having a hard time?

1205
01:09:04.880 --> 01:09:07.479
<v Speaker 2>I could what would that be relevant for the conversation

1206
01:09:07.560 --> 01:09:08.319
<v Speaker 2>of the Final Authority?

1207
01:09:08.399 --> 01:09:09.800
<v Speaker 4>Because I'm trying to figure out why you have to

1208
01:09:09.840 --> 01:09:10.720
<v Speaker 4>repeat everything I.

1209
01:09:10.800 --> 01:09:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Say, and make sure I understood it right to be scharitable.

1210
01:09:14.039 --> 01:09:15.800
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so you're slow, I got it.

1211
01:09:17.119 --> 01:09:18.800
<v Speaker 19>Yeah, that's the one way to put it. So anyway,

1212
01:09:18.960 --> 01:09:21.159
<v Speaker 19>So you want to say that the holy spirits of

1213
01:09:21.159 --> 01:09:21.720
<v Speaker 19>the final authority?

1214
01:09:21.760 --> 01:09:22.039
<v Speaker 2>Correct?

1215
01:09:22.880 --> 01:09:23.640
<v Speaker 4>I already said that.

1216
01:09:24.560 --> 01:09:26.399
<v Speaker 19>Okay, So what does it have to do with anything

1217
01:09:26.439 --> 01:09:30.119
<v Speaker 19>else that the Orthodox brings into in terms of it's

1218
01:09:30.159 --> 01:09:32.319
<v Speaker 19>finalizing anything, any type of authority?

1219
01:09:32.359 --> 01:09:33.159
<v Speaker 2>So what does that do?

1220
01:09:33.359 --> 01:09:35.439
<v Speaker 4>So that's why I said the very beginning normative.

1221
01:09:35.119 --> 01:09:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Authority, meaning that it's typically the case.

1222
01:09:41.119 --> 01:09:42.640
<v Speaker 4>Do you know the difference between those things?

1223
01:09:43.640 --> 01:09:45.319
<v Speaker 2>Oh? That's why I'm asking a clarifying question.

1224
01:09:45.399 --> 01:09:47.399
<v Speaker 4>Oh you came to debate, and now you're playing like

1225
01:09:47.479 --> 01:09:50.119
<v Speaker 4>you're here to ask questions? So are you here to

1226
01:09:50.159 --> 01:09:51.319
<v Speaker 4>ask questions? You're here at debate?

1227
01:09:52.439 --> 01:09:54.439
<v Speaker 2>That's part of the debate, is it not? Is it

1228
01:09:54.520 --> 01:09:54.920
<v Speaker 2>not a question?

1229
01:09:55.880 --> 01:09:57.399
<v Speaker 4>It seems like if you wanted to debate, you would

1230
01:09:57.479 --> 01:09:59.399
<v Speaker 4>know the positions you're debating. But so are you here

1231
01:09:59.479 --> 01:10:00.680
<v Speaker 4>to learn or you hear to debate?

1232
01:10:01.760 --> 01:10:04.319
<v Speaker 2>I mean I would love to learn, well, debating I

1233
01:10:04.399 --> 01:10:05.079
<v Speaker 2>have no problem with that.

1234
01:10:07.239 --> 01:10:08.000
<v Speaker 4>What was the question?

1235
01:10:09.359 --> 01:10:12.800
<v Speaker 19>So I'm asking you, based on what you previously said,

1236
01:10:12.800 --> 01:10:16.439
<v Speaker 19>that the Holy Spirit is a final authority. Right then,

1237
01:10:16.800 --> 01:10:18.800
<v Speaker 19>how does that come into play with all the other factors,

1238
01:10:19.000 --> 01:10:19.920
<v Speaker 19>like the oral tradition?

1239
01:10:20.479 --> 01:10:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1240
01:10:20.680 --> 01:10:22.760
<v Speaker 19>Deciphering what the oral tradition is? How would the Holy

1241
01:10:22.840 --> 01:10:25.039
<v Speaker 19>Spirit deciphered the correct oral tradition.

1242
01:10:25.279 --> 01:10:27.399
<v Speaker 4>And all the other bishops, I mean, the same way,

1243
01:10:27.600 --> 01:10:30.319
<v Speaker 4>just the same way he deciphered it in preserving it

1244
01:10:30.399 --> 01:10:32.600
<v Speaker 4>from the time of Adam until Moses wrote it down.

1245
01:10:33.479 --> 01:10:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, how would I objectively be able to affirm that? What?

1246
01:10:37.199 --> 01:10:39.119
<v Speaker 2>How would I objectively be able to confirm that?

1247
01:10:39.840 --> 01:10:41.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean, isn't that your own position?

1248
01:10:44.319 --> 01:10:46.239
<v Speaker 2>So you are you saying that the Holy Spirit makes

1249
01:10:46.319 --> 01:10:48.239
<v Speaker 2>me feel that this is correct? Like that's a position?

1250
01:10:48.439 --> 01:10:50.239
<v Speaker 4>What did I say about anything that it was making

1251
01:10:50.279 --> 01:10:52.960
<v Speaker 4>you feel something? You don't believe that the Holy Spirit? Listen,

1252
01:10:53.199 --> 01:10:55.800
<v Speaker 4>you don't believe the Holy Spirit guided oral tradition from

1253
01:10:55.880 --> 01:10:56.680
<v Speaker 4>Adam to Moses.

1254
01:10:58.399 --> 01:10:59.359
<v Speaker 2>No, no, I don't believe that.

1255
01:11:01.039 --> 01:11:04.119
<v Speaker 4>Okay, then you're not reformed anymore. So what are you

1256
01:11:04.199 --> 01:11:05.600
<v Speaker 4>just changing your positions on the spot?

1257
01:11:06.800 --> 01:11:08.520
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't think.

1258
01:11:08.720 --> 01:11:11.000
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I'm sicky or at your laugh, your condescending laugh

1259
01:11:11.079 --> 01:11:12.760
<v Speaker 4>is getting on my nerves. What how do you not

1260
01:11:12.920 --> 01:11:16.920
<v Speaker 4>understand that you're not reformed?

1261
01:11:18.319 --> 01:11:19.600
<v Speaker 2>That has nothing to do with or traditions.

1262
01:11:19.640 --> 01:11:21.920
<v Speaker 4>Of course, yes it does. So how do you think

1263
01:11:22.000 --> 01:11:25.279
<v Speaker 4>that the message came from Adam until Moses wrote it down?

1264
01:11:26.960 --> 01:11:29.439
<v Speaker 19>The entire point is when Moses, when God gave a

1265
01:11:29.600 --> 01:11:32.039
<v Speaker 19>certain point for him to write.

1266
01:11:31.880 --> 01:11:33.600
<v Speaker 2>It down God and to be carried out.

1267
01:11:34.239 --> 01:11:38.119
<v Speaker 4>So you're I'm sorry, I'm asking you how did they

1268
01:11:38.199 --> 01:11:40.800
<v Speaker 4>transmit it through those generations? You don't understand this question?

1269
01:11:40.920 --> 01:11:42.439
<v Speaker 4>Do I need to draw it on a board for you?

1270
01:11:43.560 --> 01:11:47.279
<v Speaker 19>Yeah, that org tradition and the story is being transformed

1271
01:11:47.359 --> 01:11:50.359
<v Speaker 19>or what I'm saying, keep keeping going in them that

1272
01:11:50.640 --> 01:11:53.359
<v Speaker 19>has nothing to do well, I'm just saying that, are you.

1273
01:11:53.399 --> 01:11:56.199
<v Speaker 4>Too stupid to even understand what I'm answering your question?

1274
01:11:56.359 --> 01:11:58.439
<v Speaker 4>You said, how is the Holy Spirit doing this the

1275
01:11:58.560 --> 01:12:01.159
<v Speaker 4>same way he did it from Adam to Moses? You

1276
01:12:01.359 --> 01:12:03.199
<v Speaker 4>just said you just said it's oral?

1277
01:12:03.359 --> 01:12:03.760
<v Speaker 8>Did you not?

1278
01:12:04.319 --> 01:12:06.920
<v Speaker 4>Did you not admit it's oral? So you're saying you

1279
01:12:07.039 --> 01:12:10.000
<v Speaker 4>have the same Why do you keep restating what I said?

1280
01:12:10.199 --> 01:12:10.439
<v Speaker 2>This is?

1281
01:12:10.640 --> 01:12:12.520
<v Speaker 4>This is like mind control or something. I'm trying to

1282
01:12:12.640 --> 01:12:14.520
<v Speaker 4>plug in the dots, right, I'm sure to make sure

1283
01:12:14.720 --> 01:12:17.560
<v Speaker 4>from the time of Adam to Moses you just said oral.

1284
01:12:17.680 --> 01:12:18.800
<v Speaker 4>So you admitted my point.

1285
01:12:19.920 --> 01:12:21.760
<v Speaker 2>So I'm asking, he's that the same thing you think

1286
01:12:21.840 --> 01:12:23.560
<v Speaker 2>you have? Right from Adam?

1287
01:12:23.680 --> 01:12:25.720
<v Speaker 4>You said, how does the Holy Spirit do it? I said,

1288
01:12:25.760 --> 01:12:26.560
<v Speaker 4>the same way he did it?

1289
01:12:26.640 --> 01:12:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Then that's completely a different sort of.

1290
01:12:29.880 --> 01:12:33.359
<v Speaker 4>Idea, you know, it's not. It's you're asking my position.

1291
01:12:33.439 --> 01:12:35.359
<v Speaker 4>I'm explaining it's literally no different than the way he

1292
01:12:35.399 --> 01:12:35.840
<v Speaker 4>preserved it.

1293
01:12:35.880 --> 01:12:40.319
<v Speaker 19>Then, So children talking about their own history, about how

1294
01:12:40.359 --> 01:12:42.880
<v Speaker 19>God had been has been working in their culture.

1295
01:12:43.119 --> 01:12:44.840
<v Speaker 2>It's completely different than having.

1296
01:12:44.640 --> 01:12:47.439
<v Speaker 4>Done children talking about what are you even talking about?

1297
01:12:47.520 --> 01:12:49.800
<v Speaker 4>Children talking about God working? What the hell are you

1298
01:12:49.840 --> 01:12:50.359
<v Speaker 4>talking about?

1299
01:12:50.680 --> 01:12:52.680
<v Speaker 19>Yeah, we're talking about like for like the in the

1300
01:12:52.720 --> 01:12:55.479
<v Speaker 19>context the concept of ancient Israel. Right, so God is

1301
01:12:55.520 --> 01:12:58.279
<v Speaker 19>literally working through this shertain type of people group and

1302
01:12:58.319 --> 01:13:00.159
<v Speaker 19>everything like that, and the stories.

1303
01:12:59.840 --> 01:13:02.199
<v Speaker 4>Of you don't even know that your own tradition from

1304
01:13:02.239 --> 01:13:05.840
<v Speaker 4>Adam to Moses teaches that God preserved that tradition, that

1305
01:13:06.039 --> 01:13:07.439
<v Speaker 4>oral transmission. You don't even know that.

1306
01:13:08.000 --> 01:13:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I know, I can read my Bible and find

1307
01:13:09.560 --> 01:13:10.439
<v Speaker 2>that out. That's fine with me.

1308
01:13:11.119 --> 01:13:13.359
<v Speaker 4>Where does the Bible tell you that the oral tradition

1309
01:13:13.560 --> 01:13:14.039
<v Speaker 4>was preserved?

1310
01:13:14.800 --> 01:13:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Again, it's it's no need.

1311
01:13:18.720 --> 01:13:22.119
<v Speaker 4>Okay, you're literally a mentally unstable weirdo. Like, literally, what

1312
01:13:22.199 --> 01:13:24.920
<v Speaker 4>you're saying makes note you don't even understand what's being said.

1313
01:13:25.760 --> 01:13:27.119
<v Speaker 4>Where does your Bible tell you that?

1314
01:13:28.479 --> 01:13:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Where does my Bible tell me what? Well?

1315
01:13:30.800 --> 01:13:32.119
<v Speaker 4>You said? All I need to do is read the

1316
01:13:32.199 --> 01:13:34.119
<v Speaker 4>Bible to figure that out. Where does it.

1317
01:13:34.119 --> 01:13:37.319
<v Speaker 19>Tell you that Jesus he's access standards to the phares

1318
01:13:37.840 --> 01:13:38.960
<v Speaker 19>he's asked, is it not?

1319
01:13:39.159 --> 01:13:41.239
<v Speaker 4>Where does that tell you the Holy Spirit guided oral

1320
01:13:41.319 --> 01:13:44.319
<v Speaker 4>tradition from Adam to Moses. So now you do believe

1321
01:13:44.359 --> 01:13:49.640
<v Speaker 4>that I said no from the beginning, But then you

1322
01:13:49.800 --> 01:13:52.800
<v Speaker 4>just said that the Bible tells you that no.

1323
01:13:52.960 --> 01:13:54.960
<v Speaker 19>The Bible tells me again, what I need to know

1324
01:13:55.079 --> 01:13:58.359
<v Speaker 19>about any sort of tradition or anything about God, any stories?

1325
01:14:00.239 --> 01:14:03.880
<v Speaker 4>How do you think the tradition was preserved from Adam

1326
01:14:03.960 --> 01:14:08.680
<v Speaker 4>to Moses? The stories that you read about in the Torah?

1327
01:14:12.760 --> 01:14:16.319
<v Speaker 4>This is this is this is the stupidest conversation I've

1328
01:14:16.319 --> 01:14:24.479
<v Speaker 4>ever read. We're done. Como, h.

1329
01:14:26.439 --> 01:14:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Hello, cayep yo. What's up? Jay? Yeah, I'm not gonna

1330
01:14:33.640 --> 01:14:35.840
<v Speaker 2>take up too much time. I got three questions. I

1331
01:14:35.880 --> 01:14:38.239
<v Speaker 2>could just rapid fire them. You can answer, and I'll

1332
01:14:38.319 --> 01:14:39.359
<v Speaker 2>come back and listen to it later.

1333
01:14:41.319 --> 01:14:44.199
<v Speaker 20>All right, So first question is who or what movement

1334
01:14:44.319 --> 01:14:47.920
<v Speaker 20>spawned the idea of the one, true, Holy and Apostolic

1335
01:14:48.039 --> 01:14:49.720
<v Speaker 20>Church being on invisible.

1336
01:14:49.319 --> 01:14:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Church, And on what basis did they come to that conclusion.

1337
01:14:52.880 --> 01:14:56.520
<v Speaker 4>It's first found amongst the donuts, and then it's repeated

1338
01:14:56.600 --> 01:14:57.399
<v Speaker 4>by Calvinists.

1339
01:14:58.600 --> 01:14:59.239
<v Speaker 2>Okay, cool.

1340
01:15:00.079 --> 01:15:02.960
<v Speaker 20>Second, you'll often hear Protestants say things like I was

1341
01:15:03.000 --> 01:15:05.479
<v Speaker 20>guided about the Holy Spirit, or you're not a spirit

1342
01:15:05.560 --> 01:15:06.680
<v Speaker 20>feel Christian, et cetera.

1343
01:15:07.199 --> 01:15:09.199
<v Speaker 2>So I'm sure it's safe to say that most.

1344
01:15:09.079 --> 01:15:11.960
<v Speaker 20>Protestants think by believing in Jesus Christ in a mental

1345
01:15:12.239 --> 01:15:15.720
<v Speaker 20>sense and professing Jesus as like Lord and Savior verbally,

1346
01:15:16.760 --> 01:15:19.560
<v Speaker 20>is at that very moment you're giving the Holy Spirit.

1347
01:15:19.640 --> 01:15:22.119
<v Speaker 2>So I'm wondering what is the traditional.

1348
01:15:21.800 --> 01:15:24.520
<v Speaker 20>Orthodoxy on receiving the Holy Spirit or what must be

1349
01:15:24.600 --> 01:15:25.800
<v Speaker 20>done to inherit the Holy Spirit.

1350
01:15:26.319 --> 01:15:28.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's not just being baptized and brought into the

1351
01:15:29.039 --> 01:15:32.239
<v Speaker 4>church in that way through catechisystem baptism, and then you

1352
01:15:32.359 --> 01:15:36.119
<v Speaker 4>have christ Mation, so they no Protestants have christ Mation.

1353
01:15:36.279 --> 01:15:38.079
<v Speaker 4>So that's one of the key elements that's missing.

1354
01:15:39.479 --> 01:15:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, cool, all right, next one, this is the Okay,

1355
01:15:42.880 --> 01:15:43.960
<v Speaker 2>this is probably the last one.

1356
01:15:44.319 --> 01:15:47.920
<v Speaker 20>So I got a friend who recently rediscovered his Christian roots.

1357
01:15:48.159 --> 01:15:51.479
<v Speaker 20>He calls himself a Christian. He's a Catholic, but he

1358
01:15:51.600 --> 01:15:53.920
<v Speaker 20>still holds on to like sort of and sort of

1359
01:15:54.000 --> 01:15:57.680
<v Speaker 20>embraces some of Nietzsche and Carl Jung's.

1360
01:15:57.319 --> 01:16:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Philosophy, specifically stuff like bracing the uber minch or the

1361
01:16:01.720 --> 01:16:03.319
<v Speaker 2>shade within and stuff like that.

1362
01:16:03.520 --> 01:16:06.960
<v Speaker 20>I'm not really too well versed on Knetzsche and Carl Jung,

1363
01:16:07.119 --> 01:16:09.159
<v Speaker 20>but I got some of the books I bottom a

1364
01:16:09.159 --> 01:16:10.239
<v Speaker 20>while ago, just never read them.

1365
01:16:10.479 --> 01:16:12.800
<v Speaker 2>So when I hear him say stuff like that, I

1366
01:16:12.920 --> 01:16:13.840
<v Speaker 2>think that sounds like.

1367
01:16:13.960 --> 01:16:16.159
<v Speaker 20>Demonic and I wouldn't like, I would err on him

1368
01:16:16.239 --> 01:16:17.600
<v Speaker 20>not leaning into stuff like that.

1369
01:16:17.720 --> 01:16:18.680
<v Speaker 2>But what's your thoughts?

1370
01:16:19.039 --> 01:16:22.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's of course that's deemonica. It's like the uber

1371
01:16:22.399 --> 01:16:25.239
<v Speaker 4>minche was that have to deal with Christianity to the

1372
01:16:25.279 --> 01:16:27.720
<v Speaker 4>guy in the chat annoying to say the least, if

1373
01:16:27.760 --> 01:16:29.600
<v Speaker 4>you don't call in, you get booted. So this is

1374
01:16:29.680 --> 01:16:32.840
<v Speaker 4>not for you to come spam all your evangelical gibberish

1375
01:16:32.840 --> 01:16:45.199
<v Speaker 4>in the chat value machine. Yeah, I'm having to unwind

1376
01:16:45.279 --> 01:16:50.039
<v Speaker 4>from that like mind controlled madness of that previous goofball.

1377
01:16:55.319 --> 01:16:57.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean to not know what the regulative principal worship

1378
01:16:57.960 --> 01:17:00.279
<v Speaker 4>is tells me that that person does even know what

1379
01:17:00.399 --> 01:17:02.600
<v Speaker 4>the reform tradition is. And so how are you going

1380
01:17:02.640 --> 01:17:04.479
<v Speaker 4>to come debate this and try to act like you're

1381
01:17:04.560 --> 01:17:12.199
<v Speaker 4>some like that's just nonsense. Okay, well it comes to

1382
01:17:12.279 --> 01:17:16.079
<v Speaker 4>the to the chat or not value. What's up on? Mute?

1383
01:17:17.000 --> 01:17:17.439
<v Speaker 2>Hey man?

1384
01:17:17.920 --> 01:17:19.439
<v Speaker 21>I want to thank you first of all for everything

1385
01:17:19.479 --> 01:17:19.960
<v Speaker 21>that you're doing.

1386
01:17:21.199 --> 01:17:24.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm not coming to debate you do, just have a question.

1387
01:17:26.399 --> 01:17:28.600
<v Speaker 21>I'm an Orthodox Christian three course dogs.

1388
01:17:29.920 --> 01:17:32.079
<v Speaker 4>I'm not doing fic qu'es today, man, So please if

1389
01:17:32.119 --> 01:17:34.880
<v Speaker 4>it's an e fic you question, you can find it online.

1390
01:17:34.960 --> 01:17:35.960
<v Speaker 4>So what's your question?

1391
01:17:37.000 --> 01:17:38.439
<v Speaker 21>It's all good then, I just wanted to ask you

1392
01:17:38.520 --> 01:17:42.039
<v Speaker 21>about like two things. The first one is the christology,

1393
01:17:42.600 --> 01:17:45.520
<v Speaker 21>you know, nature nature of Jesus, Jesus, and.

1394
01:17:45.520 --> 01:17:48.640
<v Speaker 2>The second one would be as my own family.

1395
01:17:49.760 --> 01:17:52.279
<v Speaker 4>And what was the question? What's the first question?

1396
01:17:52.840 --> 01:17:55.319
<v Speaker 2>The first question is the nature of nature of Jesus right,

1397
01:17:55.479 --> 01:17:55.880
<v Speaker 2>like what.

1398
01:17:55.920 --> 01:17:57.600
<v Speaker 4>Do you mean? What's How's that a question?

1399
01:17:58.359 --> 01:17:58.399
<v Speaker 2>No?

1400
01:17:58.640 --> 01:18:01.920
<v Speaker 21>So if you can't explain it it of how like

1401
01:18:02.239 --> 01:18:06.640
<v Speaker 21>the Greek Orthodox or the Orthodox viewpoint of how we

1402
01:18:06.760 --> 01:18:09.239
<v Speaker 21>believe like Jesus was right like the natures and everything.

1403
01:18:09.800 --> 01:18:12.000
<v Speaker 2>If a tafic you question, then fine, that's.

1404
01:18:12.119 --> 01:18:13.640
<v Speaker 4>I'm not trying to be rude. That's a basic I

1405
01:18:13.640 --> 01:18:17.640
<v Speaker 4>would say, go read uh Dogmatic Theology by Palmazanski and

1406
01:18:17.720 --> 01:18:20.199
<v Speaker 4>he will give you a basic introduction to the hypostatic union.

1407
01:18:20.720 --> 01:18:23.319
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much, forth, I gotcha, Sure, thank you.

1408
01:18:23.680 --> 01:18:25.920
<v Speaker 4>No problem. I'm not trying to be rude, but we're

1409
01:18:25.960 --> 01:18:28.119
<v Speaker 4>not doing basic q and A today. This is for

1410
01:18:28.319 --> 01:18:32.359
<v Speaker 4>people who disagree, So debate Islam, Atheism, Catholics, and protests

1411
01:18:32.399 --> 01:18:34.800
<v Speaker 4>of Gnostic Mormon, JW, Hebrew roots whatever.

1412
01:18:35.479 --> 01:18:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

1413
01:18:36.520 --> 01:18:40.439
<v Speaker 4>Please do not ask me a bunch of basic Orthodox questions.

1414
01:18:41.079 --> 01:18:44.079
<v Speaker 4>So this is for people who disagree. Raise your hand

1415
01:18:44.079 --> 01:18:47.399
<v Speaker 4>if you disagree, Benny.

1416
01:18:52.439 --> 01:18:53.439
<v Speaker 2>You what's up?

1417
01:18:56.640 --> 01:18:56.960
<v Speaker 4>Okay?

1418
01:18:57.119 --> 01:19:01.800
<v Speaker 22>So I want to Yeah, you're talking about that the

1419
01:19:01.920 --> 01:19:03.680
<v Speaker 22>Quran has the Trinity wrong?

1420
01:19:04.119 --> 01:19:08.159
<v Speaker 2>Can you can you show that please? It's also a myss.

1421
01:19:09.319 --> 01:19:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Like the last time I came with the myth that.

1422
01:19:11.960 --> 01:19:16.520
<v Speaker 23>The Quran talks about the same so uh that you

1423
01:19:16.960 --> 01:19:18.439
<v Speaker 23>believe in there's also a myth.

1424
01:19:18.560 --> 01:19:19.680
<v Speaker 2>So I dismantled that.

1425
01:19:20.680 --> 01:19:23.319
<v Speaker 4>You didn't dismantle it. You said a bunch of stupid

1426
01:19:23.359 --> 01:19:26.520
<v Speaker 4>ship and then you didn't have an answer. All right,

1427
01:19:26.600 --> 01:19:28.359
<v Speaker 4>Now you're not gonna say you're not gonna talk over

1428
01:19:28.439 --> 01:19:31.880
<v Speaker 4>me with those nonsense you get out of here. You

1429
01:19:32.399 --> 01:19:35.000
<v Speaker 4>do you really think you dismantled the last time you

1430
01:19:35.039 --> 01:19:38.479
<v Speaker 4>were in here? Yes, my claim was, and how did

1431
01:19:38.560 --> 01:19:42.119
<v Speaker 4>you You didn't even you couldn't even restate my argument?

1432
01:19:42.199 --> 01:19:43.399
<v Speaker 4>How do you think you dismantled it?

1433
01:19:44.760 --> 01:19:45.359
<v Speaker 15>If there is it?

1434
01:19:45.520 --> 01:19:51.159
<v Speaker 2>So you my plim my argument.

1435
01:19:52.439 --> 01:19:53.800
<v Speaker 4>Can you restate my argument?

1436
01:19:55.000 --> 01:19:55.680
<v Speaker 7>No, but you.

1437
01:20:02.560 --> 01:20:14.640
<v Speaker 4>Beak did none through even though he couldn't even state

1438
01:20:14.680 --> 01:20:17.840
<v Speaker 4>what the argument is. Trust me, bro, he dismantled it.

1439
01:20:23.479 --> 01:20:25.520
<v Speaker 4>I gotta I'm getting a little two heated. Hey, Jamie,

1440
01:20:27.479 --> 01:20:29.600
<v Speaker 4>I need a I need a ginger chew. My my

1441
01:20:29.720 --> 01:20:32.840
<v Speaker 4>blood sugars, my beat us is getting off the charts.

1442
01:20:33.520 --> 01:20:35.239
<v Speaker 4>Could you bring me a ginger chew?

1443
01:20:35.279 --> 01:20:35.800
<v Speaker 24>And uh?

1444
01:20:35.840 --> 01:20:37.399
<v Speaker 4>And I don't need more coffee. I'm gonna got to

1445
01:20:37.479 --> 01:20:41.359
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna get too heated with the idiots. Bring me

1446
01:20:41.439 --> 01:20:45.800
<v Speaker 4>one ginger you please? Thank you? Okay. Beecke is having

1447
01:20:45.800 --> 01:20:49.960
<v Speaker 4>a hard time connecting, so we'll go to Dallas.

1448
01:20:57.399 --> 01:21:04.159
<v Speaker 25>Yep, Yeah, So I I actually read the Dudo canonical books,

1449
01:21:04.920 --> 01:21:07.800
<v Speaker 25>like I guess what was the last month?

1450
01:21:08.000 --> 01:21:08.039
<v Speaker 2>Like?

1451
01:21:08.359 --> 01:21:12.119
<v Speaker 25>From first isdras all the way to second Maccabee's I

1452
01:21:12.239 --> 01:21:13.319
<v Speaker 25>was just wondering.

1453
01:21:16.439 --> 01:21:17.319
<v Speaker 1>What what is the.

1454
01:21:19.039 --> 01:21:22.159
<v Speaker 25>Does the Greek Orthodox? So you guys reconcile? How do

1455
01:21:22.239 --> 01:21:23.880
<v Speaker 25>y'all reconcile the beginning of Judith?

1456
01:21:25.800 --> 01:21:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

1457
01:21:26.840 --> 01:21:30.279
<v Speaker 4>You're talking about when it mentions a king? That is

1458
01:21:30.319 --> 01:21:32.039
<v Speaker 4>that we're talking about that. I'm going from memory. I

1459
01:21:32.039 --> 01:21:33.439
<v Speaker 4>haven't looked at this a long time, is it?

1460
01:21:36.479 --> 01:21:36.520
<v Speaker 2>So?

1461
01:21:36.960 --> 01:21:39.920
<v Speaker 4>The Jews? The Jews typically will use the term of

1462
01:21:40.039 --> 01:21:42.680
<v Speaker 4>one king to reference to all of their enemies for

1463
01:21:42.760 --> 01:21:46.319
<v Speaker 4>all time, Like Amelek becomes a forever a reference to

1464
01:21:46.600 --> 01:21:49.600
<v Speaker 4>every enemy of Israel, even though Amelek was dead a

1465
01:21:49.640 --> 01:21:50.239
<v Speaker 4>long time ago.

1466
01:21:51.920 --> 01:21:56.079
<v Speaker 25>Okay, So I've heard, I've heard, well, I research, like

1467
01:21:56.399 --> 01:21:59.960
<v Speaker 25>Catholics try to give me the answer, and they basically talk,

1468
01:22:00.199 --> 01:22:03.800
<v Speaker 25>but they basically said that, like the region of Assyria

1469
01:22:04.039 --> 01:22:07.920
<v Speaker 25>was like a huge region that included Babylon also.

1470
01:22:07.920 --> 01:22:11.720
<v Speaker 4>So, I mean the Book of Revelation calls, you know,

1471
01:22:12.880 --> 01:22:16.520
<v Speaker 4>Israel at the time of Christ Sodom and Gomorrah. I

1472
01:22:16.600 --> 01:22:18.279
<v Speaker 4>mean the Jews do this often?

1473
01:22:18.840 --> 01:22:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, Yeah, that's all I wanted to know.

1474
01:22:21.760 --> 01:22:25.640
<v Speaker 4>That's okay. I mean it's a common objection. I don't

1475
01:22:25.680 --> 01:22:27.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't think it's a very strong objection. I mean

1476
01:22:28.439 --> 01:22:30.960
<v Speaker 4>the same higher critics will point to similar types of

1477
01:22:31.039 --> 01:22:34.840
<v Speaker 4>things in the canonical text. So who disagrees? So we

1478
01:22:34.960 --> 01:22:39.720
<v Speaker 4>got a bunch of people, fifteen people. I'm eating ginger

1479
01:22:39.880 --> 01:22:42.359
<v Speaker 4>cheese to calm down before you start fussing at me

1480
01:22:42.399 --> 01:22:48.880
<v Speaker 4>forgetting got to calm down. And actually people think he's

1481
01:22:48.920 --> 01:22:54.039
<v Speaker 4>so mean. The quote meanness actually is because of just

1482
01:22:54.119 --> 01:22:57.039
<v Speaker 4>low blood sugar at time like that. That's all it is.

1483
01:22:58.199 --> 01:23:04.520
<v Speaker 4>Because people will say, how see sometimes he's super patient. Yeah,

1484
01:23:04.560 --> 01:23:05.760
<v Speaker 4>it's because of love bluture.

1485
01:23:05.840 --> 01:23:06.079
<v Speaker 8>That's it.

1486
01:23:06.119 --> 01:23:12.479
<v Speaker 4>So I gotta have a ginger chew Greek Greek name. Man,

1487
01:23:12.600 --> 01:23:19.439
<v Speaker 4>I can't see what that says. The Chat is saying

1488
01:23:19.439 --> 01:23:24.079
<v Speaker 4>to be more mean, more meon or more mean? Go ahead, man,

1489
01:23:24.119 --> 01:23:24.760
<v Speaker 4>what's up? I'm you.

1490
01:23:27.039 --> 01:23:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Hey jay, I'm a Catechuban. I had not here to debate.

1491
01:23:33.039 --> 01:23:33.680
<v Speaker 15>You have a question.

1492
01:23:36.600 --> 01:23:39.640
<v Speaker 26>So I have an acquaintance that goes to Catholic confession,

1493
01:23:40.319 --> 01:23:42.840
<v Speaker 26>cites Bible versus like a Protestant.

1494
01:23:42.920 --> 01:23:46.359
<v Speaker 27>And yet it has the audacity to say that the

1495
01:23:46.560 --> 01:23:47.439
<v Speaker 27>Orthodox Church is.

1496
01:23:49.239 --> 01:23:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Told the true Church. How does what sort of like

1497
01:23:52.159 --> 01:23:54.039
<v Speaker 2>what sort of rebuttal do you have for someone who

1498
01:23:54.119 --> 01:23:54.399
<v Speaker 2>does that?

1499
01:23:54.920 --> 01:24:02.520
<v Speaker 4>Who says what you cut out. Hello, rebettal to what

1500
01:24:02.600 --> 01:24:03.119
<v Speaker 4>you cut out?

1501
01:24:04.479 --> 01:24:05.119
<v Speaker 2>That's a connection?

1502
01:24:09.079 --> 01:24:11.039
<v Speaker 4>You cut out? Man, I can't. I couldn't get that question.

1503
01:24:11.159 --> 01:24:12.880
<v Speaker 4>Try to come out and come back in bea want

1504
01:24:12.880 --> 01:24:21.079
<v Speaker 4>to try again. I got my ginger chew. I'll calm

1505
01:24:21.119 --> 01:24:27.520
<v Speaker 4>him down now, beak, I'm mute.

1506
01:24:28.399 --> 01:24:30.239
<v Speaker 2>Yo. Hello Jay? What's up? You hear me?

1507
01:24:30.479 --> 01:24:30.840
<v Speaker 4>Yes, sir?

1508
01:24:31.960 --> 01:24:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh hey Jay?

1509
01:24:32.720 --> 01:24:35.760
<v Speaker 28>So Roman Catholic here. I just had a couple of questions.

1510
01:24:35.840 --> 01:24:38.720
<v Speaker 28>So I watched your you know, reasons not be Roman

1511
01:24:38.800 --> 01:24:41.840
<v Speaker 28>Catholic video, and well, I thought it was persuasive. I

1512
01:24:41.920 --> 01:24:44.680
<v Speaker 28>saw a response that I think kind of just put

1513
01:24:44.720 --> 01:24:47.319
<v Speaker 28>you in shambles. It was by this guy named Michael Lofton.

1514
01:24:47.399 --> 01:24:48.199
<v Speaker 28>Have you ever heard of him?

1515
01:24:50.760 --> 01:24:51.399
<v Speaker 4>Is that a joke?

1516
01:24:52.640 --> 01:24:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Well?

1517
01:24:52.840 --> 01:24:54.520
<v Speaker 28>No, I just think he pointed out how you were

1518
01:24:54.600 --> 01:24:56.520
<v Speaker 28>being really uncharitable, so you kind of have no.

1519
01:24:56.600 --> 01:24:59.520
<v Speaker 4>Like, okay, you're joking uncharitable.

1520
01:25:03.000 --> 01:25:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm just wondering, you know, when are you gonna,

1521
01:25:04.760 --> 01:25:06.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, join the One True Church? You know, it's.

1522
01:25:08.800 --> 01:25:10.800
<v Speaker 4>Do you have an argument or what's what's up?

1523
01:25:11.439 --> 01:25:14.039
<v Speaker 2>Well? Yeah, I'm asking you, you know, so all.

1524
01:25:13.960 --> 01:25:21.680
<v Speaker 4>Right, that's really funny. I honestly can't tell that I

1525
01:25:21.800 --> 01:25:25.600
<v Speaker 4>was joking me answerious, It could go either way. Alexander,

1526
01:25:30.359 --> 01:25:32.079
<v Speaker 4>I'm in shambles. From Michael Lufton.

1527
01:25:32.880 --> 01:25:37.279
<v Speaker 2>Okay, quick question, would you ever debate Bartnerman?

1528
01:25:39.479 --> 01:25:41.800
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. I'm not a textual scholar, so if

1529
01:25:41.840 --> 01:25:44.800
<v Speaker 4>I debated him, it would be more of a philosophical debate,

1530
01:25:44.880 --> 01:25:50.000
<v Speaker 4>and I doubt he would do a philosophical debate. So great,

1531
01:25:50.199 --> 01:25:52.159
<v Speaker 4>bro you great and cheese in the background. What's going on?

1532
01:25:53.840 --> 01:25:54.119
<v Speaker 2>Rory?

1533
01:25:59.239 --> 01:26:04.800
<v Speaker 4>Does not the brood? Then you are in shambles. Broad

1534
01:26:06.039 --> 01:26:08.720
<v Speaker 4>If is anybody present an argument, I've not heard one.

1535
01:26:08.800 --> 01:26:11.479
<v Speaker 4>Has anybody even given an argument yet? At least the

1536
01:26:11.640 --> 01:26:14.079
<v Speaker 4>romanicality at the beginning had a few questions and stay

1537
01:26:14.239 --> 01:26:16.520
<v Speaker 4>and at least at tend But nobody's given an argument yet.

1538
01:26:18.000 --> 01:26:18.279
<v Speaker 8>Rory.

1539
01:26:19.399 --> 01:26:23.119
<v Speaker 2>Getami mm hm h.

1540
01:26:23.399 --> 01:26:24.520
<v Speaker 29>Just get a question A bit.

1541
01:26:26.439 --> 01:26:30.279
<v Speaker 2>Like textual criticism on the New Testament. If you've got

1542
01:26:30.479 --> 01:26:32.640
<v Speaker 2>the actual and historical account of.

1543
01:26:32.680 --> 01:26:38.359
<v Speaker 4>Jesus, what in your mind counts as a historical account?

1544
01:26:38.399 --> 01:26:40.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, do the New Testament texts and the thousands

1545
01:26:40.560 --> 01:26:43.760
<v Speaker 4>of texts from the first few centuries count, because that's

1546
01:26:44.159 --> 01:26:46.279
<v Speaker 4>more textual attestation than any other text.

1547
01:26:47.640 --> 01:26:50.279
<v Speaker 2>If they're anonymous side, they're.

1548
01:26:50.159 --> 01:26:52.119
<v Speaker 4>Not anonymous the tradition of the Church is that they're

1549
01:26:52.119 --> 01:26:54.039
<v Speaker 4>written by other people, that they're said to be written.

1550
01:26:53.800 --> 01:26:57.800
<v Speaker 12>By Butt, and scholarship disagrees with that.

1551
01:26:58.199 --> 01:27:00.640
<v Speaker 4>So on what basis am I supposed follow on belie scholarship?

1552
01:27:00.640 --> 01:27:02.000
<v Speaker 4>Do you agree with them on the Quran?

1553
01:27:04.640 --> 01:27:05.680
<v Speaker 2>I agree with them on the Korn.

1554
01:27:06.600 --> 01:27:13.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you don't think that unbelieving scholars debunk the Quran? Really?

1555
01:27:16.479 --> 01:27:21.520
<v Speaker 4>You don't have to like, yeah, come on, you think

1556
01:27:21.600 --> 01:27:24.439
<v Speaker 4>New Testament scholar excuse me, a liberal scholars do not

1557
01:27:24.560 --> 01:27:25.359
<v Speaker 4>debunk the Koran.

1558
01:27:27.279 --> 01:27:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Why are we moving to the Korn?

1559
01:27:29.359 --> 01:27:31.199
<v Speaker 4>Because it's illustrating a double standard?

1560
01:27:34.720 --> 01:27:37.600
<v Speaker 5>Okay, okay, you don't want to address don't want to

1561
01:27:37.600 --> 01:27:38.600
<v Speaker 5>address the so.

1562
01:27:38.680 --> 01:27:40.039
<v Speaker 4>You're admitting it's a double standard.

1563
01:27:41.600 --> 01:27:46.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm just you said, okay, what you you were?

1564
01:27:46.319 --> 01:27:48.920
<v Speaker 4>You appealed to unbelieving scholars, and I said, do you

1565
01:27:49.000 --> 01:27:51.920
<v Speaker 4>accept them on the Quran? So that's a double standard.

1566
01:27:52.000 --> 01:27:55.319
<v Speaker 2>But you're admitting that it is anonymous.

1567
01:27:55.439 --> 01:27:57.159
<v Speaker 4>No, I'm saying that you have a double standard.

1568
01:27:59.239 --> 01:28:00.000
<v Speaker 2>What are they.

1569
01:28:01.439 --> 01:28:03.640
<v Speaker 4>They're not anonymous by the tradition of the Church. I'm

1570
01:28:03.640 --> 01:28:06.680
<v Speaker 4>not a Protestant, I'm an Orthodox. We believe in tradition.

1571
01:28:08.560 --> 01:28:10.840
<v Speaker 2>So how does that tradition bring you to thinking that

1572
01:28:11.119 --> 01:28:11.840
<v Speaker 2>was actually.

1573
01:28:11.760 --> 01:28:14.000
<v Speaker 4>The same way that I know what the candone Scripture

1574
01:28:14.039 --> 01:28:15.840
<v Speaker 4>is by tradition. So you think you're arguing to get

1575
01:28:15.880 --> 01:28:16.600
<v Speaker 4>a Protestant or not.

1576
01:28:18.920 --> 01:28:21.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm asking you to give me the evidence in.

1577
01:28:21.800 --> 01:28:27.520
<v Speaker 4>The tradition of the church. Is the evidence? Yeah, because

1578
01:28:28.119 --> 01:28:30.600
<v Speaker 4>it's believed to be the tradition that may if you right,

1579
01:28:30.720 --> 01:28:32.640
<v Speaker 4>may if you you understand this is an argument I

1580
01:28:32.760 --> 01:28:35.159
<v Speaker 4>use against Protestants. You don't even know I use this argument.

1581
01:28:36.920 --> 01:28:38.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but Matthew didn't wrot Matthew.

1582
01:28:38.760 --> 01:28:40.520
<v Speaker 4>You don't know that the tradition of the church is

1583
01:28:40.560 --> 01:28:42.439
<v Speaker 4>that he did. So that's a question that depends on

1584
01:28:42.520 --> 01:28:43.079
<v Speaker 4>your worldview.

1585
01:28:43.319 --> 01:28:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Matthew is.

1586
01:28:46.239 --> 01:28:50.159
<v Speaker 4>To Mark and that's what liberal scholars say. And you

1587
01:28:50.399 --> 01:28:53.319
<v Speaker 4>don't apply that standard consistently because you don't listen to

1588
01:28:53.359 --> 01:28:55.640
<v Speaker 4>liberal liberal scholars on the Quran. Do you so you

1589
01:28:55.680 --> 01:28:58.720
<v Speaker 4>have a double standard? Do you have a double standard?

1590
01:28:59.800 --> 01:29:00.439
<v Speaker 2>Apostle?

1591
01:29:00.560 --> 01:29:03.680
<v Speaker 4>Do you have a double standard or not? Do you

1592
01:29:03.840 --> 01:29:05.239
<v Speaker 4>why are you laughing? Do you have a double standard

1593
01:29:05.319 --> 01:29:10.199
<v Speaker 4>or not? Now, do you have a double standard or not?

1594
01:29:11.680 --> 01:29:16.199
<v Speaker 4>Explain why it's not a double standard. You can't so

1595
01:29:16.359 --> 01:29:18.720
<v Speaker 4>notice he can't answer this. Can you explain why it's

1596
01:29:18.720 --> 01:29:29.920
<v Speaker 4>not a double standard. So it's all trolls today again,

1597
01:29:30.000 --> 01:29:31.800
<v Speaker 4>which is which is fine. It's not all trills but

1598
01:29:32.239 --> 01:29:37.640
<v Speaker 4>largely trills. So notice the double standard right now, nour

1599
01:29:38.720 --> 01:29:43.560
<v Speaker 4>now uh as usual with Muslims. But by the way,

1600
01:29:43.600 --> 01:29:46.119
<v Speaker 4>I reject out of hand that I listened to any

1601
01:29:46.359 --> 01:29:50.119
<v Speaker 4>liberal scholar. And notice he doesn't listen to any liberal

1602
01:29:50.159 --> 01:29:59.640
<v Speaker 4>scholar on the Quran. I'm not taking f A Hughes

1603
01:29:59.720 --> 01:30:05.479
<v Speaker 4>acts on Yep.

1604
01:30:06.880 --> 01:30:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so not really an f A to you.

1605
01:30:09.199 --> 01:30:12.359
<v Speaker 30>I'm I'm an ex senator contest, I'm mechanic human and

1606
01:30:12.439 --> 01:30:14.640
<v Speaker 30>it's a bit more of an a deeper question.

1607
01:30:14.800 --> 01:30:18.600
<v Speaker 2>So anyway, I was, I was a Scotist when I

1608
01:30:18.680 --> 01:30:21.079
<v Speaker 2>was a senator contest. And there's a are you.

1609
01:30:21.079 --> 01:30:25.279
<v Speaker 30>Familiar with the absolute primacy of Christ? That that's thesis

1610
01:30:25.399 --> 01:30:30.279
<v Speaker 30>within all the what it's called the absolute.

1611
01:30:29.800 --> 01:30:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Primacy of Christ.

1612
01:30:32.079 --> 01:30:32.880
<v Speaker 4>I don't know what that mean.

1613
01:30:33.760 --> 01:30:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, it's basically the.

1614
01:30:35.319 --> 01:30:38.920
<v Speaker 30>Theory that if Adam hadn't sent Christ would have become

1615
01:30:39.000 --> 01:30:40.199
<v Speaker 30>incarnate anyways or that.

1616
01:30:40.520 --> 01:30:42.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's the Eastern Father's teaching.

1617
01:30:43.640 --> 01:30:46.399
<v Speaker 30>Okay, So is that Yeah, I've read that Maximus and

1618
01:30:46.439 --> 01:30:48.159
<v Speaker 30>a few others. So does that have the status of

1619
01:30:48.279 --> 01:30:49.960
<v Speaker 30>like your official teaching of the one.

1620
01:30:49.840 --> 01:30:52.680
<v Speaker 4>That I was church is that at uh it's I mean,

1621
01:30:52.720 --> 01:30:54.760
<v Speaker 4>there's no dogma. I'm not aware of a dogma to

1622
01:30:54.840 --> 01:30:57.159
<v Speaker 4>states that it's just normative in the Orthodox Church to

1623
01:30:57.359 --> 01:31:01.039
<v Speaker 4>understand Adam is as a Chris the logical being.

1624
01:31:02.199 --> 01:31:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Sure. Okay, awesome, thank you, I answered my question.

1625
01:31:04.800 --> 01:31:07.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, great question, And you are correct that is a

1626
01:31:08.000 --> 01:31:11.920
<v Speaker 4>unique thing that the Franciscans had in contrast to the

1627
01:31:12.000 --> 01:31:15.960
<v Speaker 4>tumus that agrees with us in the East. Jimmy, I'm

1628
01:31:16.000 --> 01:31:21.239
<v Speaker 4>not answering faqes so yep.

1629
01:31:22.199 --> 01:31:25.880
<v Speaker 31>Hey, So I'm a Meridia Cathick having trouble reconciling and

1630
01:31:26.079 --> 01:31:30.840
<v Speaker 31>accepting the idea that our sacraments are that different.

1631
01:31:31.399 --> 01:31:33.479
<v Speaker 2>And if you could just touch on that and you

1632
01:31:33.600 --> 01:31:35.520
<v Speaker 2>a talking about each one individually.

1633
01:31:35.079 --> 01:31:37.720
<v Speaker 4>But just in general, I don't know what you mean,

1634
01:31:37.800 --> 01:31:39.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean different in what sense?

1635
01:31:41.199 --> 01:31:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was just.

1636
01:31:42.119 --> 01:31:44.800
<v Speaker 31>Reading online a little bit about the differences in the

1637
01:31:45.479 --> 01:31:48.800
<v Speaker 31>two and that some sacraments are not accepted.

1638
01:31:48.920 --> 01:31:52.479
<v Speaker 2>In the Catholic Church as well as the Orthodox.

1639
01:31:52.600 --> 01:31:54.319
<v Speaker 31>If one were to go to the other one and

1640
01:31:54.840 --> 01:31:57.880
<v Speaker 31>receive sacraments in those that they're not accepted.

1641
01:31:57.479 --> 01:31:58.079
<v Speaker 2>In each other.

1642
01:31:59.159 --> 01:32:02.239
<v Speaker 4>Sometimes, Yeah, it's a case by case basis. The local

1643
01:32:02.279 --> 01:32:05.720
<v Speaker 4>bishop applies the canons based on your situation and what

1644
01:32:06.279 --> 01:32:07.399
<v Speaker 4>what was your history?

1645
01:32:08.920 --> 01:32:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so something like the Eucharist could not be I've

1646
01:32:12.880 --> 01:32:14.119
<v Speaker 2>read that, like I would not be able to go

1647
01:32:14.159 --> 01:32:16.039
<v Speaker 2>to an Orthodox church and take us.

1648
01:32:16.239 --> 01:32:18.920
<v Speaker 4>No, you cannot. No, you have to abjure your heresies.

1649
01:32:20.199 --> 01:32:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, got it, all right? Thanks?

1650
01:32:22.000 --> 01:32:24.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, No, I see I misunderstood the question. I see

1651
01:32:24.680 --> 01:32:27.880
<v Speaker 4>what you're asking. Now, I got you. I was thinking

1652
01:32:27.920 --> 01:32:29.880
<v Speaker 4>you mean in terms of vality. You're saying, like, could

1653
01:32:29.920 --> 01:32:31.800
<v Speaker 4>I go and partake it? The second I see you

1654
01:32:31.880 --> 01:32:34.000
<v Speaker 4>mean vertical?

1655
01:32:38.520 --> 01:32:38.800
<v Speaker 2>You see.

1656
01:32:38.800 --> 01:32:40.680
<v Speaker 4>I have calm them down. Now, I have my sugars,

1657
01:32:41.279 --> 01:32:44.600
<v Speaker 4>have my beat us. I have my beat us.

1658
01:32:44.720 --> 01:32:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Choose. Well, you must not forget the eleventh Commandment. There, Jay,

1659
01:32:53.039 --> 01:32:54.399
<v Speaker 2>that'll shalt be nice.

1660
01:32:55.760 --> 01:32:56.920
<v Speaker 4>I am being nice. What's up?

1661
01:32:56.960 --> 01:32:57.079
<v Speaker 2>Man?

1662
01:32:58.079 --> 01:32:58.199
<v Speaker 1>Uh?

1663
01:32:58.319 --> 01:33:01.720
<v Speaker 2>So I have a I have a doctrinal question.

1664
01:33:02.000 --> 01:33:05.760
<v Speaker 32>I'm a Protestant and one of the things that's a

1665
01:33:05.840 --> 01:33:08.960
<v Speaker 32>hang up for me because as I've been researching into

1666
01:33:09.039 --> 01:33:12.960
<v Speaker 32>Orthodoxy is preservation of the saints.

1667
01:33:13.000 --> 01:33:15.239
<v Speaker 2>It's it's you know, as far as.

1668
01:33:15.119 --> 01:33:18.479
<v Speaker 32>The other five points of Calvinism, I've kind of come

1669
01:33:18.560 --> 01:33:21.680
<v Speaker 32>to reject but I think that Roman.

1670
01:33:21.560 --> 01:33:23.399
<v Speaker 4>Do you mean perseverance of the saints. I don't know

1671
01:33:23.399 --> 01:33:24.000
<v Speaker 4>what you're talking about.

1672
01:33:24.079 --> 01:33:28.439
<v Speaker 32>Yeah, perseverance of the Saints. But I feel like Romans

1673
01:33:28.560 --> 01:33:35.079
<v Speaker 32>eight thirty eight is like pretty solid and understanding that nothing.

1674
01:33:34.880 --> 01:33:36.039
<v Speaker 2>Can separate us from God.

1675
01:33:36.680 --> 01:33:39.680
<v Speaker 32>And I think the reason why Paul goes into such

1676
01:33:39.760 --> 01:33:44.520
<v Speaker 32>great detail about describing all different things is to say, hey, well,

1677
01:33:44.720 --> 01:33:47.319
<v Speaker 32>there's not a single thing that can separate us from God.

1678
01:33:47.399 --> 01:33:49.960
<v Speaker 32>And one of my biggest hang ups with Orthodoxy is.

1679
01:33:50.640 --> 01:33:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Is it doesn't There doesn't seem to be any assurance.

1680
01:33:55.079 --> 01:33:56.880
<v Speaker 2>So I'd like to hear what you have to say

1681
01:33:56.880 --> 01:33:57.159
<v Speaker 2>about it.

1682
01:33:57.159 --> 01:33:57.279
<v Speaker 8>Well.

1683
01:33:57.359 --> 01:34:02.399
<v Speaker 4>First, I mean, even if hypothetic I adopted some Calvinists position,

1684
01:34:02.640 --> 01:34:05.720
<v Speaker 4>you're in no different individual existential position than I am.

1685
01:34:05.840 --> 01:34:08.760
<v Speaker 4>Because Calvinists admit that there's such a thing as self deception,

1686
01:34:09.279 --> 01:34:11.199
<v Speaker 4>where you could believe that you're want to be elect

1687
01:34:11.479 --> 01:34:13.760
<v Speaker 4>and believe that the Holy Spirit has given you the assurance,

1688
01:34:13.800 --> 01:34:16.399
<v Speaker 4>and you might be deluding yourself. So really, there's not

1689
01:34:16.840 --> 01:34:20.359
<v Speaker 4>actually this assurance. There's a theoretical doctrine of assurance, that

1690
01:34:20.399 --> 01:34:22.479
<v Speaker 4>doesn't mean that you have it as an individual Calvinist.

1691
01:34:22.880 --> 01:34:25.279
<v Speaker 4>If you believe in self deception. So that's one point.

1692
01:34:25.680 --> 01:34:28.680
<v Speaker 4>Second point I would say is that the statements about

1693
01:34:29.159 --> 01:34:31.319
<v Speaker 4>what Paul says in Roman's aid have to be balanced

1694
01:34:31.359 --> 01:34:33.439
<v Speaker 4>with everything else he says in many of the other places,

1695
01:34:33.520 --> 01:34:35.840
<v Speaker 4>And so in Hebrews he says that you can particular

1696
01:34:35.840 --> 01:34:38.319
<v Speaker 4>the heavenly gift and be enlightened and so forth and

1697
01:34:38.800 --> 01:34:41.119
<v Speaker 4>fall away. So why would there be all these warnings

1698
01:34:41.159 --> 01:34:44.439
<v Speaker 4>of apostasy if there is no such thing as apostacy.

1699
01:34:45.680 --> 01:34:51.880
<v Speaker 32>Well, I'm not saying that aposesey isn't a possibility.

1700
01:34:51.920 --> 01:34:55.960
<v Speaker 33>I'm saying that someone who is truly a yeah.

1701
01:34:56.000 --> 01:34:57.600
<v Speaker 4>But it begs the question. I know I've heard this

1702
01:34:57.640 --> 01:34:59.079
<v Speaker 4>a million times, So how do you know that you're

1703
01:34:59.159 --> 01:35:00.119
<v Speaker 4>the truly, the truly.

1704
01:35:01.479 --> 01:35:04.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying that. I'm not saying that anyone can

1705
01:35:04.479 --> 01:35:06.920
<v Speaker 2>know without a shadow of a doubt. I'm not.

1706
01:35:07.199 --> 01:35:09.399
<v Speaker 4>Well, then it's then it's not assurance. Then it's not

1707
01:35:09.800 --> 01:35:12.520
<v Speaker 4>once saved always said, not assurance. Okay, So anyway, I

1708
01:35:12.600 --> 01:35:14.279
<v Speaker 4>appreciate the question. I'm not going to go for an

1709
01:35:14.279 --> 01:35:16.000
<v Speaker 4>hour back and forth on that. If you if you

1710
01:35:16.239 --> 01:35:20.600
<v Speaker 4>don't find the text about apost to seek convincing, then okay.

1711
01:35:21.359 --> 01:35:21.479
<v Speaker 9>Uh.

1712
01:35:21.680 --> 01:35:36.880
<v Speaker 4>Next up, cool video I'm mute. By the way, if

1713
01:35:36.880 --> 01:35:38.079
<v Speaker 4>you want to support the stream, you can do so

1714
01:35:38.239 --> 01:35:40.640
<v Speaker 4>via super chats. You can also support stream via my

1715
01:35:40.720 --> 01:35:45.560
<v Speaker 4>bitcoin wallet right there. Bitcoin is a free speech based

1716
01:35:45.680 --> 01:35:51.119
<v Speaker 4>mechanism of true currency, true money, authentic ethical money, based

1717
01:35:51.199 --> 01:35:56.800
<v Speaker 4>on math, and based on an international decentralized network. That's

1718
01:35:56.920 --> 01:36:02.960
<v Speaker 4>my wallet, all right. He can't connect, come out, come

1719
01:36:03.000 --> 01:36:05.479
<v Speaker 4>back in if you want to, Please do not come

1720
01:36:05.520 --> 01:36:08.199
<v Speaker 4>on and ask me FAQ questions. If you want to debate,

1721
01:36:08.359 --> 01:36:20.199
<v Speaker 4>I give you the premiacy of place, Rick, Rick, you

1722
01:36:20.279 --> 01:36:22.319
<v Speaker 4>got to get a good connection if you want to

1723
01:36:22.359 --> 01:36:36.000
<v Speaker 4>come on, you don't have to keep raising your hand. Rick,

1724
01:36:36.239 --> 01:36:42.680
<v Speaker 4>I don't know what's up, man, you won't connect. Look,

1725
01:36:43.079 --> 01:36:46.600
<v Speaker 4>if you're an inquirer, if you're a Catechuman, please just

1726
01:36:48.119 --> 01:36:51.199
<v Speaker 4>we do this every day. You don't have to. Is

1727
01:36:51.199 --> 01:36:53.600
<v Speaker 4>there people lazy? Like can you not go ask your

1728
01:36:53.640 --> 01:36:56.439
<v Speaker 4>priest or read the Pomeazansky book? Like you don't have

1729
01:36:56.560 --> 01:37:07.920
<v Speaker 4>to ask me every FAQ catechumen question? Guys, yeah, tech, do.

1730
01:37:08.039 --> 01:37:08.399
<v Speaker 2>You hear me?

1731
01:37:08.760 --> 01:37:08.960
<v Speaker 8>Yeah?

1732
01:37:10.760 --> 01:37:14.640
<v Speaker 34>So right now, I'm thinking of converting either to Catalysism

1733
01:37:15.319 --> 01:37:22.680
<v Speaker 34>or Orthodoxy. But I don't understand how the papacy doesn't work.

1734
01:37:22.720 --> 01:37:28.000
<v Speaker 2>I think having the unity that they have is is

1735
01:37:28.119 --> 01:37:30.359
<v Speaker 2>good like unit?

1736
01:37:30.439 --> 01:37:32.960
<v Speaker 4>What unity do you think they have? I mean, again,

1737
01:37:33.279 --> 01:37:35.279
<v Speaker 4>you're not familiar with the world of Catholicism if you

1738
01:37:35.319 --> 01:37:36.000
<v Speaker 4>think it's united.

1739
01:37:37.319 --> 01:37:41.159
<v Speaker 34>But the Orthodox don't share the same belings about who

1740
01:37:41.279 --> 01:37:46.239
<v Speaker 34>can be rebaptized, contraception look average.

1741
01:37:46.600 --> 01:37:51.119
<v Speaker 4>But the fact that there's debate and the like discussion

1742
01:37:51.319 --> 01:37:55.880
<v Speaker 4>over issues does not mean that there's no unity. Right.

1743
01:37:56.239 --> 01:37:58.439
<v Speaker 4>What I'm pointing out is that what you're looking for

1744
01:37:58.640 --> 01:38:01.720
<v Speaker 4>doesn't exist. There is no unity like you think in Rome.

1745
01:38:02.199 --> 01:38:04.159
<v Speaker 4>And by the way, even if you think there is,

1746
01:38:04.279 --> 01:38:06.199
<v Speaker 4>even if there was a superficial unity, if it's not

1747
01:38:06.239 --> 01:38:07.520
<v Speaker 4>based on truth, it doesn't matter.

1748
01:38:09.920 --> 01:38:11.119
<v Speaker 35>Uh Yeah.

1749
01:38:11.199 --> 01:38:17.319
<v Speaker 34>But aschism between the Moscow and Constantinople.

1750
01:38:18.079 --> 01:38:20.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but there's a gigantic schism within the Roman Gallic Church.

1751
01:38:20.840 --> 01:38:21.640
<v Speaker 4>So what are you talking about?

1752
01:38:22.760 --> 01:38:26.000
<v Speaker 34>Yea, if I'm joining the Russian Church, is it like

1753
01:38:26.159 --> 01:38:28.640
<v Speaker 34>a separate one or is it the same?

1754
01:38:29.079 --> 01:38:30.159
<v Speaker 2>Because no, they are.

1755
01:38:30.319 --> 01:38:34.119
<v Speaker 4>They are out of communion in terms of not reading

1756
01:38:34.159 --> 01:38:36.159
<v Speaker 4>each other. In the Diptychs, the church has not yet

1757
01:38:36.239 --> 01:38:39.479
<v Speaker 4>excommunicated each other, so that is not officially a schism yet.

1758
01:38:40.479 --> 01:38:43.880
<v Speaker 4>All right, But you're not gonna get you're not gonna

1759
01:38:43.960 --> 01:38:46.399
<v Speaker 4>get away from that in Rome, because you're gonna go

1760
01:38:46.479 --> 01:38:49.399
<v Speaker 4>into Rome thinking that as greener pastures, and then you're

1761
01:38:49.439 --> 01:38:51.920
<v Speaker 4>gonna learn about all the problems and contradictions between pre

1762
01:38:52.000 --> 01:38:54.840
<v Speaker 4>Vatican one, a, pre Vatican two and postmatical three teaching,

1763
01:38:55.039 --> 01:38:56.640
<v Speaker 4>and then you're gonna be confronted with whether you need

1764
01:38:56.680 --> 01:38:58.239
<v Speaker 4>to be a trat or not. You're gonna realize that

1765
01:38:58.319 --> 01:38:59.319
<v Speaker 4>you made the wrong decision.

1766
01:39:01.159 --> 01:39:01.520
<v Speaker 2>All right.

1767
01:39:02.399 --> 01:39:05.680
<v Speaker 34>Yesterday I talked you to a Catholic priest and I

1768
01:39:05.760 --> 01:39:09.279
<v Speaker 34>told him that I didn't really like the crin pope,

1769
01:39:09.319 --> 01:39:12.640
<v Speaker 34>and he told me that he sees the pope like

1770
01:39:13.439 --> 01:39:14.079
<v Speaker 34>as a father.

1771
01:39:14.840 --> 01:39:17.159
<v Speaker 2>Even if he does something wrong, you still need to

1772
01:39:17.800 --> 01:39:18.560
<v Speaker 2>respect to him.

1773
01:39:18.640 --> 01:39:21.199
<v Speaker 4>Okay, but that has nothing to do with Roman Catholic

1774
01:39:21.319 --> 01:39:25.840
<v Speaker 4>dogmatic teaching. Okay, the pope cannot teach new dogmas or

1775
01:39:25.960 --> 01:39:29.239
<v Speaker 4>change the dogmas and he has that's the point. So again,

1776
01:39:29.520 --> 01:39:31.720
<v Speaker 4>you're coming at this with a very naive, simple I'm

1777
01:39:31.720 --> 01:39:33.520
<v Speaker 4>not dissing you, but I'm saying it's a very naive

1778
01:39:33.640 --> 01:39:36.119
<v Speaker 4>kind of simple view, like it's going to work this way. Well,

1779
01:39:36.159 --> 01:39:37.600
<v Speaker 4>I get to see him as a father, and then

1780
01:39:37.600 --> 01:39:39.960
<v Speaker 4>we'll get a new trad pope in the future. None

1781
01:39:40.000 --> 01:39:43.319
<v Speaker 4>of that is even close to what happened to Vatican two.

1782
01:39:43.840 --> 01:39:46.119
<v Speaker 4>And when you have the pope going and praying in mosque,

1783
01:39:46.159 --> 01:39:48.600
<v Speaker 4>and by the way, it's not just Francis, it's trad

1784
01:39:48.680 --> 01:39:51.720
<v Speaker 4>Pope Benedict praying mosque towards Mecca. So do you not

1785
01:39:51.880 --> 01:39:55.359
<v Speaker 4>see that as like a major violation of basic Christian teaching?

1786
01:39:56.520 --> 01:39:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

1787
01:39:56.880 --> 01:39:58.640
<v Speaker 4>I say that because so why would you want to

1788
01:39:58.720 --> 01:40:01.119
<v Speaker 4>join that you're joining in? You understand, you don't get

1789
01:40:01.199 --> 01:40:04.239
<v Speaker 4>to join Catholicism and not be in spiritual communion with

1790
01:40:04.399 --> 01:40:07.439
<v Speaker 4>Francis and his crew. Like there's no other there's not

1791
01:40:07.560 --> 01:40:11.279
<v Speaker 4>like a Catholicism that's not connected to that. You're spiritually

1792
01:40:11.399 --> 01:40:13.279
<v Speaker 4>in communion with the Bishop of Rome.

1793
01:40:14.720 --> 01:40:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but he didn't bind the church to worship and the.

1794
01:40:18.800 --> 01:40:23.439
<v Speaker 4>Mosques, right, No, that's not true. So this is all

1795
01:40:23.520 --> 01:40:26.119
<v Speaker 4>the propaganda that you've been told by Roman Catholics that

1796
01:40:26.159 --> 01:40:27.479
<v Speaker 4>you don't have to believe this stuff. Have you read

1797
01:40:27.560 --> 01:40:28.079
<v Speaker 4>Vatican two?

1798
01:40:29.920 --> 01:40:30.199
<v Speaker 8>Okay?

1799
01:40:30.479 --> 01:40:33.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, Vatican two says that you are bound to believe

1800
01:40:33.039 --> 01:40:36.840
<v Speaker 4>that Muslims and Catholics worshiped together the same God and

1801
01:40:36.880 --> 01:40:39.159
<v Speaker 4>have the faith of Abraham. Do you think that's that's correct?

1802
01:40:41.960 --> 01:40:46.520
<v Speaker 34>I think not trially you, But I think it's meant

1803
01:40:46.800 --> 01:40:52.079
<v Speaker 34>it's Kulman that it's more a way to evangelize the

1804
01:40:52.159 --> 01:40:52.760
<v Speaker 34>other faiths.

1805
01:40:53.840 --> 01:40:56.159
<v Speaker 4>Do you think he's not evangelizing when he goes in

1806
01:40:56.239 --> 01:40:58.479
<v Speaker 4>praise and moss towards Mecca and builds an Abrahamic faith

1807
01:40:58.479 --> 01:41:00.760
<v Speaker 4>center and tells people not to prossly How is he

1808
01:41:00.800 --> 01:41:02.800
<v Speaker 4>evangelizing when he says not to proselytize?

1809
01:41:05.119 --> 01:41:08.199
<v Speaker 2>But did he make did he make a dougma or is.

1810
01:41:08.199 --> 01:41:11.920
<v Speaker 4>It just he's expressing that this is what Vatican two

1811
01:41:12.039 --> 01:41:14.680
<v Speaker 4>tells you to do. Vatican two is telling you that

1812
01:41:14.920 --> 01:41:17.359
<v Speaker 4>they have the same God, they have the faith of Abraham,

1813
01:41:17.960 --> 01:41:19.960
<v Speaker 4>So why do we need to evangelize them? And by

1814
01:41:20.000 --> 01:41:22.920
<v Speaker 4>the way, you can't. You can't, the pope can't. You

1815
01:41:23.039 --> 01:41:25.880
<v Speaker 4>can't act contrary to the dogmas. If you're a pope,

1816
01:41:26.399 --> 01:41:29.079
<v Speaker 4>that's also an action of apostasy to go and pray

1817
01:41:29.119 --> 01:41:31.800
<v Speaker 4>and moss towards Mecca. So you're trying to say, oh,

1818
01:41:31.840 --> 01:41:34.800
<v Speaker 4>he's trying to evangelize him. No, no he's not. They

1819
01:41:34.880 --> 01:41:37.880
<v Speaker 4>used to call crusades against these people now, but they're

1820
01:41:37.880 --> 01:41:40.479
<v Speaker 4>evangelizing them a praying most wars Mecca. That's that's an

1821
01:41:40.520 --> 01:41:43.319
<v Speaker 4>action of apostacy. It violates the ancient cannons that say

1822
01:41:43.359 --> 01:41:44.479
<v Speaker 4>you can't even go in mosques.

1823
01:41:45.880 --> 01:41:49.279
<v Speaker 34>So you're saying that if the pope is a heretic

1824
01:41:49.640 --> 01:41:52.760
<v Speaker 34>or he commits sins, that he's the whole system.

1825
01:41:53.439 --> 01:41:56.960
<v Speaker 4>Roman Catholic theology does not say that the pope doesn't sin,

1826
01:41:57.279 --> 01:41:59.920
<v Speaker 4>but it says that he can't commit actions of apostas

1827
01:42:00.359 --> 01:42:03.680
<v Speaker 4>like that, because then Rome would defect. Rome cannot defect

1828
01:42:03.680 --> 01:42:07.119
<v Speaker 4>in Romancalatic theology. You defect from the faith by actions

1829
01:42:07.159 --> 01:42:09.520
<v Speaker 4>of apostasy, and you're gonna learn if you become a Catholic,

1830
01:42:09.560 --> 01:42:12.039
<v Speaker 4>and you're gonna make a huge mistake that Romancalaic theology

1831
01:42:12.119 --> 01:42:15.000
<v Speaker 4>has certain sins that automatically excommunicate you. One of those

1832
01:42:15.079 --> 01:42:18.960
<v Speaker 4>is abration. Another one of those is to participate in

1833
01:42:19.119 --> 01:42:22.039
<v Speaker 4>this type of worship with things like Muslims or Pagans.

1834
01:42:22.279 --> 01:42:25.600
<v Speaker 4>To do those things in those rituals is an action

1835
01:42:25.760 --> 01:42:29.479
<v Speaker 4>of apostasies to surrender the faith. That's why as late

1836
01:42:29.600 --> 01:42:32.800
<v Speaker 4>as nineteen twenty eight and Mortalium Animos, the papacy was

1837
01:42:32.840 --> 01:42:35.279
<v Speaker 4>still teaching that it is apostasy to do these things.

1838
01:42:35.880 --> 01:42:38.960
<v Speaker 4>Go read Mortalium Animos then read lemon Gentum sixteen and

1839
01:42:39.000 --> 01:42:42.359
<v Speaker 4>then Nostra Atate. So you're just falling for all of

1840
01:42:42.399 --> 01:42:45.239
<v Speaker 4>their sales pitch, and you're missing the major point here,

1841
01:42:45.279 --> 01:42:48.119
<v Speaker 4>which is that this is clearly not the same church

1842
01:42:48.359 --> 01:42:49.720
<v Speaker 4>that called for crusades.

1843
01:42:54.159 --> 01:42:56.039
<v Speaker 2>That's true, another Christian but on the same topic.

1844
01:42:57.319 --> 01:43:00.159
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so.

1845
01:43:05.640 --> 01:43:06.600
<v Speaker 2>So Abbot.

1846
01:43:07.920 --> 01:43:11.960
<v Speaker 36>The first centuries, the priests told me that there was

1847
01:43:12.079 --> 01:43:16.960
<v Speaker 36>only three sees and that Constantinople was ather later, and

1848
01:43:17.359 --> 01:43:19.359
<v Speaker 36>that's why we have the patriarchate.

1849
01:43:19.479 --> 01:43:22.359
<v Speaker 2>So it's not bublic, but it's not a tradition to

1850
01:43:22.439 --> 01:43:24.159
<v Speaker 2>have the pentarchy.

1851
01:43:24.680 --> 01:43:27.800
<v Speaker 4>Like, no, that's that's stupid, that's stupid according to his

1852
01:43:27.880 --> 01:43:30.159
<v Speaker 4>own tradition, because Pope saying, Gregory the Great refers to

1853
01:43:30.199 --> 01:43:36.439
<v Speaker 4>the pentarchy. So no nobody believes the pentarchy is from

1854
01:43:36.479 --> 01:43:40.119
<v Speaker 4>the apostles. But in the ecumenical councils, the church eventually

1855
01:43:40.159 --> 01:43:43.399
<v Speaker 4>accepts the pentarchy, even the Western Church, and Gregory the

1856
01:43:43.439 --> 01:43:45.720
<v Speaker 4>Great talks about it. In fact, Gregory the Great says,

1857
01:43:45.760 --> 01:43:49.800
<v Speaker 4>the see of Peter is Rome, Alexandria and Antioch. You

1858
01:43:49.880 --> 01:43:52.399
<v Speaker 4>can go read the Alexandria. Look before you make this

1859
01:43:52.520 --> 01:43:55.159
<v Speaker 4>dumb decision, go read the Alexandria document. And the Chi

1860
01:43:55.199 --> 01:43:58.000
<v Speaker 4>eighty document, and you're going to realize that today's Roman

1861
01:43:58.039 --> 01:43:59.920
<v Speaker 4>Catholic Church is not the church in the Middle Ages.

1862
01:44:00.239 --> 01:44:03.359
<v Speaker 4>It's not the Latin papal church anymore. It's the acumenous

1863
01:44:03.479 --> 01:44:06.800
<v Speaker 4>world church that believes anything and everything. And the Alexandria

1864
01:44:06.880 --> 01:44:09.000
<v Speaker 4>Document and the Ciady document will prove that to you.

1865
01:44:14.560 --> 01:44:41.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking for people who disagree, Lauren, you have to immune.

1866
01:44:45.319 --> 01:44:46.039
<v Speaker 2>Can you hear me? Now?

1867
01:44:46.520 --> 01:44:46.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

1868
01:44:49.760 --> 01:44:54.600
<v Speaker 20>How does the Orthodox Church rectify the seventh anathema from

1869
01:44:54.640 --> 01:44:58.319
<v Speaker 20>emphasis one on the christology.

1870
01:44:57.720 --> 01:45:03.199
<v Speaker 2>Of Christ having two wills? H uh huh?

1871
01:45:03.439 --> 01:45:05.479
<v Speaker 4>So are you not familiar with any of our responses

1872
01:45:05.520 --> 01:45:06.880
<v Speaker 4>to this stuff? You think that we don't know what

1873
01:45:06.960 --> 01:45:07.640
<v Speaker 4>episode says?

1874
01:45:09.479 --> 01:45:12.039
<v Speaker 2>No, I I this is my first time asking a question.

1875
01:45:12.680 --> 01:45:14.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking into or than.

1876
01:45:25.239 --> 01:45:36.239
<v Speaker 4>H Are you there? Hello?

1877
01:45:36.960 --> 01:45:38.279
<v Speaker 2>Do you have a Hello?

1878
01:45:41.000 --> 01:45:44.199
<v Speaker 4>What's an anthematic? Did you say you're cutting out?

1879
01:45:45.600 --> 01:46:03.000
<v Speaker 34>I'm sorry, I'm driving the seventh anathemoeah.

1880
01:45:57.279 --> 01:46:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, mm hmm. It's the one specifically teaching on No.

1881
01:46:06.680 --> 01:46:09.159
<v Speaker 2>Two wills after the Where does this say?

1882
01:46:09.239 --> 01:46:10.840
<v Speaker 4>No, I mean I'm looking at it. I don't say

1883
01:46:10.840 --> 01:46:12.600
<v Speaker 4>anything about no. Two wills? What are you talking about?

1884
01:46:14.920 --> 01:46:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Well? I mean they have to be united wills, right,

1885
01:46:18.079 --> 01:46:19.279
<v Speaker 2>I mean I may be mistaken.

1886
01:46:20.119 --> 01:46:23.119
<v Speaker 4>If anyone shall say that Jesus as man is only

1887
01:46:23.319 --> 01:46:26.000
<v Speaker 4>energized by the word of God, this would be one

1888
01:46:26.600 --> 01:46:29.680
<v Speaker 4>this would be one energy or one will, let him

1889
01:46:29.680 --> 01:46:30.199
<v Speaker 4>be anathema?

1890
01:46:36.840 --> 01:46:37.279
<v Speaker 16>Are you there?

1891
01:46:38.000 --> 01:46:40.720
<v Speaker 4>I don't understand how this been the case. What you're

1892
01:46:40.720 --> 01:46:43.319
<v Speaker 4>talking about? What do you think our position is?

1893
01:46:45.560 --> 01:46:48.279
<v Speaker 2>Well? I believe that the position is two wills right

1894
01:46:48.840 --> 01:46:49.279
<v Speaker 2>in Christ?

1895
01:46:49.960 --> 01:46:52.880
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I'm looking at the seventh I'm looking at the

1896
01:46:52.920 --> 01:46:55.439
<v Speaker 4>seventh Anathema, and it says, if anyone shall say that

1897
01:46:55.560 --> 01:46:58.479
<v Speaker 4>Jesus as man is only energized by the word of

1898
01:46:58.560 --> 01:47:00.600
<v Speaker 4>God and that the glory of the only begotten Son,

1899
01:47:00.600 --> 01:47:02.560
<v Speaker 4>who is attributed to him as something not properly his,

1900
01:47:02.840 --> 01:47:05.479
<v Speaker 4>let him be anathema. I mean, so it's saying in

1901
01:47:05.760 --> 01:47:09.880
<v Speaker 4>the story and position, Yeah.

1902
01:47:10.159 --> 01:47:12.119
<v Speaker 2>He's claiming that Christ has two wills.

1903
01:47:13.399 --> 01:47:15.279
<v Speaker 4>No, that's not the story. That's not when the stories

1904
01:47:15.359 --> 01:47:19.680
<v Speaker 4>is arguing the Storias has a dual subject Christology. This

1905
01:47:19.840 --> 01:47:21.640
<v Speaker 4>is not saying there's only one will, and that is

1906
01:47:21.680 --> 01:47:23.439
<v Speaker 4>not saying there's only one will. Where does it say that?

1907
01:47:25.399 --> 01:47:27.760
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't specifically say that. I was just kind of

1908
01:47:27.840 --> 01:47:30.199
<v Speaker 2>assuming that's what he meant by saying that the word

1909
01:47:30.279 --> 01:47:31.760
<v Speaker 2>doesn't energize the human.

1910
01:47:33.159 --> 01:47:34.800
<v Speaker 4>Wait say that again? The word?

1911
01:47:34.880 --> 01:47:39.319
<v Speaker 2>What that the word doesn't energize the the the flesh,

1912
01:47:39.479 --> 01:47:39.960
<v Speaker 2>the human.

1913
01:47:41.199 --> 01:47:43.159
<v Speaker 4>No, it says, if anyone s else, say that Jesus

1914
01:47:43.239 --> 01:47:46.680
<v Speaker 4>man is only energized by the Word of God, so

1915
01:47:46.800 --> 01:47:54.319
<v Speaker 4>that would be one energy. And then it says, and

1916
01:47:54.399 --> 01:47:57.119
<v Speaker 4>then to say that the glory is attributed to him

1917
01:47:57.119 --> 01:48:00.000
<v Speaker 4>as not something properly his, in other words, one subject.

1918
01:48:00.840 --> 01:48:03.159
<v Speaker 4>There's only one subject in Christ, the Son of God,

1919
01:48:03.840 --> 01:48:06.119
<v Speaker 4>the Word of God. But this does not say that

1920
01:48:06.199 --> 01:48:08.239
<v Speaker 4>he has only This is saying that you cannot say

1921
01:48:08.239 --> 01:48:09.560
<v Speaker 4>there's only one divine energy.

1922
01:48:13.479 --> 01:48:15.079
<v Speaker 2>Okay, thank you.

1923
01:48:16.600 --> 01:48:18.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm sorry. It's just really hard to hear what

1924
01:48:18.079 --> 01:48:24.079
<v Speaker 4>you're saying because of the background noise. But yeah, I mean,

1925
01:48:24.159 --> 01:48:27.479
<v Speaker 4>Nestorius doesn't. It's the debate with the Storius is not

1926
01:48:27.600 --> 01:48:30.439
<v Speaker 4>over two wills or two natures. The debate with the

1927
01:48:30.560 --> 01:48:38.239
<v Speaker 4>Sorius is dual subject christology. Dave, what's up?

1928
01:48:38.319 --> 01:48:38.439
<v Speaker 10>Name?

1929
01:48:50.000 --> 01:48:50.119
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

1930
01:48:50.960 --> 01:48:55.560
<v Speaker 4>Dave? Right there? You gotta amute?

1931
01:48:59.680 --> 01:49:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, automatically you too, I know. So. So I'm the

1932
01:49:05.600 --> 01:49:08.119
<v Speaker 2>Mormon on the channel and slid clicks.

1933
01:49:08.119 --> 01:49:11.680
<v Speaker 37>So my claim is that you know Book Mormon's true

1934
01:49:11.720 --> 01:49:13.199
<v Speaker 37>than or the doxy.

1935
01:49:12.920 --> 01:49:15.479
<v Speaker 4>Has kind of a problem, Well, how could the Book

1936
01:49:15.479 --> 01:49:17.640
<v Speaker 4>of Mormon be true when it's just like Islam when

1937
01:49:17.680 --> 01:49:20.560
<v Speaker 4>it says that the prior revelation is all corrupted unless

1938
01:49:20.600 --> 01:49:21.640
<v Speaker 4>it agrees with the Book of Mormon.

1939
01:49:22.359 --> 01:49:24.520
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a common tact that people use. We

1940
01:49:24.560 --> 01:49:26.920
<v Speaker 2>don't say the prior revelation.

1941
01:49:26.640 --> 01:49:29.319
<v Speaker 4>Is all corrupted every moment. Every Mormon I've ever talked to,

1942
01:49:29.680 --> 01:49:31.880
<v Speaker 4>many many of the missionaries say that the Bible's.

1943
01:49:32.680 --> 01:49:34.720
<v Speaker 37>I think you would agree that that part of the

1944
01:49:34.800 --> 01:49:37.399
<v Speaker 37>Bible is not exactly as it was when it came.

1945
01:49:37.319 --> 01:49:40.039
<v Speaker 4>Out, and now it is corrupted. You said, it's that's

1946
01:49:40.079 --> 01:49:41.600
<v Speaker 4>not it. That's not a thing you do, But now

1947
01:49:41.600 --> 01:49:42.119
<v Speaker 4>you're saying it is.

1948
01:49:42.239 --> 01:49:45.720
<v Speaker 2>I said, it's not entirely corrupted like the Bible.

1949
01:49:46.039 --> 01:49:48.199
<v Speaker 4>Okay, what's your criteria for knowing when it's not and

1950
01:49:48.279 --> 01:49:48.680
<v Speaker 4>what it is?

1951
01:49:50.520 --> 01:49:53.239
<v Speaker 2>Joseph Smith made translations or corrections to it.

1952
01:49:53.520 --> 01:49:58.000
<v Speaker 4>That's so exactly what I said, just like the Muslims,

1953
01:49:58.239 --> 01:50:00.960
<v Speaker 4>winter degrees with winter degrees when it agrees with the

1954
01:50:01.000 --> 01:50:02.039
<v Speaker 4>Book of Mormon is correct.

1955
01:50:03.359 --> 01:50:05.199
<v Speaker 37>You if you actually looked at the details, there are

1956
01:50:05.279 --> 01:50:06.159
<v Speaker 37>like five of them.

1957
01:50:06.039 --> 01:50:09.680
<v Speaker 4>That are doesn't matter. So again, because the whole point

1958
01:50:09.760 --> 01:50:12.520
<v Speaker 4>is that that thing's correct, matter because that thing's corrupted.

1959
01:50:12.640 --> 01:50:15.479
<v Speaker 4>And now, so basically you lied because the very thing

1960
01:50:15.520 --> 01:50:16.319
<v Speaker 4>I said is what you did.

1961
01:50:16.800 --> 01:50:17.479
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I'm just.

1962
01:50:17.479 --> 01:50:19.359
<v Speaker 37>Saying if you look those if you look at a

1963
01:50:19.359 --> 01:50:20.560
<v Speaker 37>specific instance.

1964
01:50:20.319 --> 01:50:21.239
<v Speaker 4>You would see you lied.

1965
01:50:22.720 --> 01:50:23.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Whatever.

1966
01:50:24.039 --> 01:50:27.920
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So thanks for admitting you lie. Okay, how's you sure?

1967
01:50:27.920 --> 01:50:29.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure that's a fun debate tactic for you.

1968
01:50:29.840 --> 01:50:31.600
<v Speaker 4>It's not a debate tactic. You said that you don't

1969
01:50:31.640 --> 01:50:32.880
<v Speaker 4>make that argument, and then you did.

1970
01:50:34.239 --> 01:50:35.960
<v Speaker 37>I don't make the argument that I said. No, I

1971
01:50:36.000 --> 01:50:37.800
<v Speaker 37>didn't make the argument that it's completely corrupted.

1972
01:50:37.960 --> 01:50:38.439
<v Speaker 2>Don't make my.

1973
01:50:38.520 --> 01:50:40.880
<v Speaker 4>Word now you're playing word games because the point I

1974
01:50:41.039 --> 01:50:43.159
<v Speaker 4>ask you, I know, I'm not. I asked you what.

1975
01:50:43.439 --> 01:50:45.800
<v Speaker 4>I asked you what I asked you what the criteria is,

1976
01:50:45.880 --> 01:50:48.319
<v Speaker 4>and you said, Joseph Smith, that's the whole argument, that's

1977
01:50:48.359 --> 01:50:51.159
<v Speaker 4>the argument. Yeah, the criteria for So you have a

1978
01:50:51.239 --> 01:50:53.479
<v Speaker 4>circular argument. Why would I follow a circular argument.

1979
01:50:54.000 --> 01:50:57.279
<v Speaker 2>No, the claim I made your playing word game.

1980
01:50:57.640 --> 01:50:59.560
<v Speaker 4>It's not a word game. It's a circular argument.

1981
01:51:00.680 --> 01:51:02.560
<v Speaker 2>No, the claim I made had nothing to do with

1982
01:51:02.640 --> 01:51:04.640
<v Speaker 2>the changes in the Bible. The claim I made said,

1983
01:51:04.640 --> 01:51:07.239
<v Speaker 2>if the Book of Mormon is true, the Orthodoxy has

1984
01:51:07.279 --> 01:51:07.680
<v Speaker 2>a problem.

1985
01:51:08.159 --> 01:51:10.279
<v Speaker 4>And I responded by saying that you have the same

1986
01:51:10.399 --> 01:51:13.039
<v Speaker 4>argument as the as the Muslims, and you basically you

1987
01:51:13.119 --> 01:51:16.920
<v Speaker 4>have made argument. Yes it is. I I've debated all

1988
01:51:16.960 --> 01:51:17.960
<v Speaker 4>the top Muslims in the world.

1989
01:51:18.000 --> 01:51:26.520
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean, Yeah, so the Bible's wrong? Like

1990
01:51:26.600 --> 01:51:27.520
<v Speaker 2>a Muslim doesn't.

1991
01:51:27.279 --> 01:51:30.039
<v Speaker 4>Say that, yes they do. What are you talking about?

1992
01:51:30.119 --> 01:51:31.279
<v Speaker 4>I have way more.

1993
01:51:31.720 --> 01:51:33.479
<v Speaker 37>Muslim argue the Book Mormon is true. That's the stupides

1994
01:51:33.479 --> 01:51:34.039
<v Speaker 37>thing I've ever heard.

1995
01:51:34.079 --> 01:51:34.279
<v Speaker 15>Dude.

1996
01:51:34.479 --> 01:51:36.600
<v Speaker 4>Obviously I didn't say that. Are you this dumb?

1997
01:51:37.279 --> 01:51:39.039
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm not just dumb. I'm just you're playing sure

1998
01:51:39.159 --> 01:51:41.159
<v Speaker 2>literally to do the same thing, right.

1999
01:51:41.600 --> 01:51:43.920
<v Speaker 4>No, I said, you have the same argument as the

2000
01:51:44.199 --> 01:51:50.279
<v Speaker 4>Muslims to say that the prior revelation. Listen the prior Dude,

2001
01:51:50.359 --> 01:51:52.600
<v Speaker 4>you literally came on and said the very thing I

2002
01:51:52.680 --> 01:51:54.279
<v Speaker 4>said you would say. And then you said, you're not

2003
01:51:54.399 --> 01:51:55.720
<v Speaker 4>saying it. This is retarded.

2004
01:51:55.840 --> 01:51:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Muslims would say like the Bible is no.

2005
01:51:58.760 --> 01:52:01.000
<v Speaker 4>They don't even know that out. That's not what they say.

2006
01:52:02.079 --> 01:52:05.439
<v Speaker 2>The Bible is right.

2007
01:52:07.119 --> 01:52:09.399
<v Speaker 4>What's your criteria? And I said, what's the criteria for

2008
01:52:09.479 --> 01:52:11.319
<v Speaker 4>when you know that? And you said, Joseph Smith, that's

2009
01:52:11.319 --> 01:52:16.079
<v Speaker 4>a circle. Yeah, Joseph Smith, that's a circle like you

2010
01:52:16.159 --> 01:52:18.319
<v Speaker 4>can take, you can take, you can That is a

2011
01:52:18.399 --> 01:52:19.479
<v Speaker 4>circular argument.

2012
01:52:21.760 --> 01:52:23.640
<v Speaker 2>It has nothing to do with the original argument, though.

2013
01:52:23.680 --> 01:52:24.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's this you're you're.

2014
01:52:24.920 --> 01:52:27.399
<v Speaker 4>You're this slow. Can you restate what my argument.

2015
01:52:27.239 --> 01:52:28.920
<v Speaker 13>Is you're saying?

2016
01:52:29.039 --> 01:52:29.840
<v Speaker 15>Can you say.

2017
01:52:31.479 --> 01:52:33.560
<v Speaker 37>You were saying because I'm saying the Book of Mormon

2018
01:52:33.680 --> 01:52:35.920
<v Speaker 37>is true, that's somehow equated to what Muslims are arguing.

2019
01:52:36.159 --> 01:52:39.199
<v Speaker 4>No, you're too stupid to even understand the comparison. That

2020
01:52:39.359 --> 01:52:40.159
<v Speaker 4>is not what I said.

2021
01:52:41.520 --> 01:52:43.359
<v Speaker 2>Good, I'm not I'm not conflating the two.

2022
01:52:45.359 --> 01:52:47.720
<v Speaker 4>You don't even understand my argument, do you?

2023
01:52:48.720 --> 01:52:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay? Restated again?

2024
01:52:50.119 --> 01:52:52.880
<v Speaker 4>So just like Muslims, I'm not saying you have the

2025
01:52:53.000 --> 01:52:56.600
<v Speaker 4>same argument that Muslims have that about the Quran and

2026
01:52:56.720 --> 01:52:59.319
<v Speaker 4>the Book of Mormon. Muslims don't care about the Book

2027
01:52:59.319 --> 01:53:01.880
<v Speaker 4>of Mormon. I'm saying you have the same argument that

2028
01:53:02.039 --> 01:53:04.880
<v Speaker 4>the principle that you used to know is the thing

2029
01:53:04.960 --> 01:53:07.079
<v Speaker 4>in question for Muslims, it's the Quran.

2030
01:53:07.399 --> 01:53:11.159
<v Speaker 2>Let me finish, use I don't use the bookrue.

2031
01:53:11.239 --> 01:53:14.079
<v Speaker 4>You literally just did you said when Joseph Smith translated,

2032
01:53:14.159 --> 01:53:17.039
<v Speaker 4>he fixed the errors. You said your criteria is Joseph Smith.

2033
01:53:17.119 --> 01:53:18.239
<v Speaker 4>That's a circular argument.

2034
01:53:18.960 --> 01:53:23.079
<v Speaker 37>I use no, yes, to know which part of the

2035
01:53:23.119 --> 01:53:25.800
<v Speaker 37>Bible is true, I use several factors, not.

2036
01:53:25.840 --> 01:53:28.920
<v Speaker 4>Just now you said Joseph Smith. So now it's changed.

2037
01:53:29.720 --> 01:53:32.000
<v Speaker 2>No, I didn't. I didn't. I didn't say only Joseph Smith.

2038
01:53:32.319 --> 01:53:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Don't don't try and again, this is so.

2039
01:53:34.760 --> 01:53:37.159
<v Speaker 4>In other words, it doesn't. So it's not so the

2040
01:53:37.279 --> 01:53:39.760
<v Speaker 4>position is a circle. So how is it not a circle?

2041
01:53:41.880 --> 01:53:43.439
<v Speaker 2>How do you know the Bible is true? Right? We

2042
01:53:43.880 --> 01:53:45.920
<v Speaker 2>read the Bible, we ask God, and God tells us

2043
01:53:45.960 --> 01:53:48.079
<v Speaker 2>the Bible is true. That's how everybody knows.

2044
01:53:48.319 --> 01:53:50.920
<v Speaker 4>No, that's a stupid argument. That's as dumb as saying

2045
01:53:51.000 --> 01:53:53.640
<v Speaker 4>that I feel good today, So God's telling me that

2046
01:53:53.720 --> 01:53:54.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm good because I feel.

2047
01:53:55.880 --> 01:53:58.159
<v Speaker 37>If you want to go with the group of Christians

2048
01:53:58.199 --> 01:54:00.119
<v Speaker 37>that don't use that argument, they would say it's.

2049
01:54:00.119 --> 01:54:03.560
<v Speaker 4>Because that's what your cult does. Your cult says that

2050
01:54:03.680 --> 01:54:05.319
<v Speaker 4>pray and you'll still have a burning in your bosom

2051
01:54:05.319 --> 01:54:07.840
<v Speaker 4>and you'll know that's God. That's a subjective to your version.

2052
01:54:07.920 --> 01:54:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Then let's go into your version. Your version is, Hey,

2053
01:54:11.119 --> 01:54:12.319
<v Speaker 2>I read the.

2054
01:54:12.359 --> 01:54:14.960
<v Speaker 37>Witness statements, and because so many of the match therefore

2055
01:54:15.000 --> 01:54:15.600
<v Speaker 37>the Bible's truth.

2056
01:54:15.800 --> 01:54:19.239
<v Speaker 4>Did you hear me give an evidentialist historicist argument? I

2057
01:54:19.279 --> 01:54:20.079
<v Speaker 4>didn't give that argument.

2058
01:54:21.159 --> 01:54:23.079
<v Speaker 2>What is your what is your claim?

2059
01:54:23.079 --> 01:54:23.199
<v Speaker 7>Then?

2060
01:54:23.199 --> 01:54:24.199
<v Speaker 2>How do you know the Bible's true?

2061
01:54:24.279 --> 01:54:25.279
<v Speaker 4>The transcendental argument?

2062
01:54:26.079 --> 01:54:27.520
<v Speaker 2>What does that mean? I have never heard that.

2063
01:54:27.960 --> 01:54:31.920
<v Speaker 4>Without God's existence, specifically the trinitarian God of the Bible,

2064
01:54:32.279 --> 01:54:34.199
<v Speaker 4>I couldn't have a basis for knowledge at all. So

2065
01:54:34.319 --> 01:54:37.760
<v Speaker 4>all knowledge ultimately derives from my revealed worldview.

2066
01:54:40.119 --> 01:54:41.159
<v Speaker 2>And that's not circular.

2067
01:54:42.119 --> 01:54:45.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's recursive because all positions are ultimately recursive.

2068
01:54:47.319 --> 01:54:50.640
<v Speaker 37>Right, But how does that not say anybody with worldview

2069
01:54:50.840 --> 01:54:52.600
<v Speaker 37>has an access to that same claim.

2070
01:54:52.640 --> 01:54:55.119
<v Speaker 2>I have a worldview and reason of logic as well.

2071
01:54:55.760 --> 01:54:57.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but your position won't be able to give a

2072
01:54:57.640 --> 01:55:01.159
<v Speaker 4>basis for reasoning and logic. It might use reason free will, I.

2073
01:55:01.199 --> 01:55:06.159
<v Speaker 2>Mean, we could go down that rabbit hole. Okay, So

2074
01:55:06.880 --> 01:55:08.199
<v Speaker 2>we believe that we have free will?

2075
01:55:09.520 --> 01:55:09.840
<v Speaker 4>Okay?

2076
01:55:10.199 --> 01:55:11.760
<v Speaker 2>So what how is that?

2077
01:55:12.159 --> 01:55:13.079
<v Speaker 4>That's not a justification?

2078
01:55:14.000 --> 01:55:17.920
<v Speaker 2>That's a justification for a non material world. No, it's not.

2079
01:55:18.199 --> 01:55:19.039
<v Speaker 4>That's just an assertion.

2080
01:55:19.399 --> 01:55:20.079
<v Speaker 2>How is that? Do you know?

2081
01:55:20.239 --> 01:55:21.840
<v Speaker 4>The difference be with an assertion and justification?

2082
01:55:24.880 --> 01:55:29.600
<v Speaker 2>What? Yes, I'm asserting it. The justification you can't claim

2083
01:55:29.960 --> 01:55:31.880
<v Speaker 2>you know. I guess you would say the justification is

2084
01:55:31.880 --> 01:55:32.920
<v Speaker 2>I think therefore I am.

2085
01:55:33.840 --> 01:55:36.319
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So now Descartes is the basis for your world view.

2086
01:55:37.840 --> 01:55:39.119
<v Speaker 2>How do you know you exist?

2087
01:55:40.399 --> 01:55:42.720
<v Speaker 4>How do I know I exist? Well, again, I believe

2088
01:55:42.840 --> 01:55:45.960
<v Speaker 4>in the Christian worldview, which is my justification for why

2089
01:55:46.079 --> 01:55:49.359
<v Speaker 4>there's particularity, why there's universals, why there's logic, whether there's

2090
01:55:49.359 --> 01:55:50.079
<v Speaker 4>an external world.

2091
01:55:50.800 --> 01:55:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Ditto same here.

2092
01:55:52.079 --> 01:55:54.520
<v Speaker 4>But you don't have a Christian worldview. You're not a Christian,

2093
01:55:54.560 --> 01:55:54.800
<v Speaker 4>you're a.

2094
01:55:54.800 --> 01:55:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Cult Well, yeah, whatever you want to call me. I

2095
01:55:56.920 --> 01:55:59.159
<v Speaker 2>believe in a worldview that allows for me to believe

2096
01:55:59.199 --> 01:55:59.720
<v Speaker 2>that I exist.

2097
01:56:00.920 --> 01:56:03.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, that, but that's not your justification because you haven't

2098
01:56:03.840 --> 01:56:05.720
<v Speaker 4>given me a coherent account. Let me give an example

2099
01:56:05.720 --> 01:56:08.119
<v Speaker 4>where it's not coherent. You're telling me that the Bible

2100
01:56:08.199 --> 01:56:10.680
<v Speaker 4>is corrupted except when Joseph Smith fixes it. Well, the

2101
01:56:10.720 --> 01:56:13.159
<v Speaker 4>Bible teaches that there's no new prophets after the time

2102
01:56:13.199 --> 01:56:16.479
<v Speaker 4>of the Apostles, So you're you're automatically counseled out by

2103
01:56:16.520 --> 01:56:19.239
<v Speaker 4>the fact that you claim there's a prophet that's a misstatement.

2104
01:56:19.279 --> 01:56:21.920
<v Speaker 37>Though you're you're making assertion that the Bible doesn't make

2105
01:56:22.880 --> 01:56:23.600
<v Speaker 37>uh no, it does.

2106
01:56:23.680 --> 01:56:25.560
<v Speaker 4>It says that in the last days He's revealed this

2107
01:56:25.680 --> 01:56:28.439
<v Speaker 4>to us through his son Hebrews one, and it says

2108
01:56:28.479 --> 01:56:30.560
<v Speaker 4>that the times of the prophets he revealed things in

2109
01:56:30.640 --> 01:56:33.279
<v Speaker 4>a different way. So that text says there's no new

2110
01:56:33.359 --> 01:56:37.239
<v Speaker 4>prophets after the time of Christ. I mean that's there's

2111
01:56:37.319 --> 01:56:39.720
<v Speaker 4>no in this last days. He spoke to us through

2112
01:56:39.720 --> 01:56:42.119
<v Speaker 4>his son, Jesus said that John the Baptist was the

2113
01:56:42.159 --> 01:56:44.680
<v Speaker 4>last of the prophets. There are no new prophets. Yes

2114
01:56:44.760 --> 01:56:47.319
<v Speaker 4>he did, Jesus, Jesus, Yes he did. He said John

2115
01:56:47.439 --> 01:56:48.600
<v Speaker 4>was the last of the prophets.

2116
01:56:49.359 --> 01:56:50.439
<v Speaker 8>No, yes he did.

2117
01:56:51.079 --> 01:56:52.840
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean he did not say John was

2118
01:56:52.840 --> 01:56:54.520
<v Speaker 2>the last prophet? Yes he did.

2119
01:56:54.640 --> 01:56:56.720
<v Speaker 4>What are you talking about? Jesus says, John is the

2120
01:56:56.840 --> 01:56:58.560
<v Speaker 4>last of the prophets, and since then the Kingdom of

2121
01:56:58.560 --> 01:57:03.319
<v Speaker 4>God has been preached. Nope, bro, So just saying nope,

2122
01:57:03.359 --> 01:57:04.359
<v Speaker 4>wrong is your argument.

2123
01:57:05.000 --> 01:57:07.319
<v Speaker 2>You can't you can't produce that claim in the Bible.

2124
01:57:07.359 --> 01:57:08.119
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't exist, Bro.

2125
01:57:08.600 --> 01:57:10.640
<v Speaker 4>John is the last of the prophets and since that

2126
01:57:10.760 --> 01:57:12.079
<v Speaker 4>time the kingdom has been preached.

2127
01:57:12.359 --> 01:57:14.159
<v Speaker 2>Just you're pulling that out of a hat. That is

2128
01:57:14.239 --> 01:57:14.880
<v Speaker 2>not the scripture.

2129
01:57:15.079 --> 01:57:17.279
<v Speaker 4>What you literally don't even know the scriptures. Of course

2130
01:57:17.319 --> 01:57:17.920
<v Speaker 4>it's in the scripture.

2131
01:57:18.279 --> 01:57:21.640
<v Speaker 37>All the scripture doesn't exist. It said John is a

2132
01:57:21.640 --> 01:57:23.960
<v Speaker 37>great profit. But you never said John was the last prophet.

2133
01:57:24.279 --> 01:57:25.640
<v Speaker 37>You're you're making a lot of inferm.

2134
01:57:25.760 --> 01:57:27.880
<v Speaker 4>You're an idiot. What are you talking about?

2135
01:57:29.840 --> 01:57:30.159
<v Speaker 2>What's that?

2136
01:57:34.439 --> 01:57:36.399
<v Speaker 4>I'm pulling it out. I'm pulling it up.

2137
01:57:39.119 --> 01:57:40.880
<v Speaker 2>So let's go back to my original claim. Though.

2138
01:57:40.920 --> 01:57:42.680
<v Speaker 4>That's the point now, now that I'm going to pull

2139
01:57:42.720 --> 01:57:43.800
<v Speaker 4>it up, you don't want to go you want to

2140
01:57:43.840 --> 01:57:44.920
<v Speaker 4>go back to the claim.

2141
01:57:45.119 --> 01:57:46.720
<v Speaker 2>I just I don't know how long it'll take you

2142
01:57:46.760 --> 01:57:49.439
<v Speaker 2>to pull it up. Sorry, go ahead, Jay, pull it up.

2143
01:57:55.479 --> 01:58:00.600
<v Speaker 4>The law and profits were until John said that time

2144
01:58:01.039 --> 01:58:04.000
<v Speaker 4>the Kingdom of Heaven has been preached and everyone presses

2145
01:58:04.079 --> 01:58:07.000
<v Speaker 4>into it. There are no more profits. You are in

2146
01:58:07.039 --> 01:58:17.800
<v Speaker 4>a cult. Oh, hold on, Luke, sixteen sixteen. There is

2147
01:58:17.880 --> 01:58:18.319
<v Speaker 4>no text.

2148
01:58:19.199 --> 01:58:20.520
<v Speaker 37>If you want to make fun of me because you're

2149
01:58:20.520 --> 01:58:21.520
<v Speaker 37>losing the argument, that's fine.

2150
01:58:22.479 --> 01:58:25.640
<v Speaker 4>I just produced the text you said doesn't exist. You

2151
01:58:25.800 --> 01:58:28.319
<v Speaker 4>produced the to it, you.

2152
01:58:28.680 --> 01:58:30.439
<v Speaker 2>Added to or took away from the scripture.

2153
01:58:30.520 --> 01:58:33.359
<v Speaker 4>You're I literally read you the text, you liar. I

2154
01:58:33.560 --> 01:58:36.319
<v Speaker 4>read you the text you're under I literally read you

2155
01:58:36.399 --> 01:58:39.760
<v Speaker 4>the text. Now I'm under condemnation. So because you added

2156
01:58:39.800 --> 01:58:42.319
<v Speaker 4>to it, added, I let I literally just read you

2157
01:58:42.399 --> 01:58:42.720
<v Speaker 4>the text.

2158
01:58:42.800 --> 01:58:45.000
<v Speaker 2>You lie, and then you added, you added a whole

2159
01:58:45.119 --> 01:58:45.880
<v Speaker 2>sentence after it.

2160
01:58:46.279 --> 01:58:48.960
<v Speaker 4>That was my explanation, dummy, Obviously.

2161
01:58:48.720 --> 01:58:51.039
<v Speaker 2>No explanation needed. It's your that was your.

2162
01:58:51.199 --> 01:58:53.159
<v Speaker 4>Then why are you talking? Why are you talking? No

2163
01:58:53.199 --> 01:58:57.279
<v Speaker 4>explanations needed because you added an explanation, you're making it.

2164
01:58:57.399 --> 01:58:59.600
<v Speaker 4>Oh but no, but so but you can give an explanation.

2165
01:58:59.800 --> 01:59:03.039
<v Speaker 4>So you're refuting your own dumb principle. I don't know

2166
01:59:03.079 --> 01:59:06.279
<v Speaker 4>what we're You just said explanations can't be given. Now

2167
01:59:06.319 --> 01:59:07.640
<v Speaker 4>you're giving explanations.

2168
01:59:08.479 --> 01:59:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Yea.

2169
01:59:10.399 --> 01:59:13.680
<v Speaker 4>The law and the prophets were until John. Since that time,

2170
01:59:13.760 --> 01:59:18.279
<v Speaker 4>the Kingdom of God has preached were until John. You're

2171
01:59:18.319 --> 01:59:27.119
<v Speaker 4>in a cult. No, no, no, no, we finally got

2172
01:59:27.199 --> 01:59:40.199
<v Speaker 4>a Mormon. Wow, who's up next? Jeff m.

2173
01:59:45.520 --> 01:59:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Yep ye, Hey, Jay, I just had a few questions. One,

2174
01:59:54.439 --> 01:59:56.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm an aspiring to be Orthodox, and.

2175
01:59:56.439 --> 01:59:59.560
<v Speaker 4>I just I'm not doing f a q and catea

2176
01:59:59.600 --> 02:00:01.600
<v Speaker 4>chemic qui since man I said that like ten times.

2177
02:00:01.720 --> 02:00:02.840
<v Speaker 4>Not trying to be rid to you, but I'm not

2178
02:00:02.880 --> 02:00:21.079
<v Speaker 4>doing that. Cassius, Hello, yep, hello, Yeah.

2179
02:00:23.600 --> 02:00:25.600
<v Speaker 2>So I got a problem.

2180
02:00:25.720 --> 02:00:29.479
<v Speaker 38>I'm an Orthodox Christian and I got a problem with

2181
02:00:29.560 --> 02:00:31.399
<v Speaker 38>this Muslim scholar in Australia.

2182
02:00:31.520 --> 02:00:34.840
<v Speaker 2>He lives near me, and I was wondering if you

2183
02:00:35.159 --> 02:00:39.479
<v Speaker 2>would be willing to debate him for because I don't

2184
02:00:39.520 --> 02:00:42.720
<v Speaker 2>know who, have no idea who this is? His name

2185
02:00:42.880 --> 02:00:44.279
<v Speaker 2>is was siem rosv.

2186
02:00:45.039 --> 02:00:46.399
<v Speaker 4>I mean, is he a known person?

2187
02:00:47.520 --> 02:00:51.680
<v Speaker 2>He's he has a large Muslim organization in Australia.

2188
02:00:52.920 --> 02:00:55.079
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. Man, Maybe you can send me his

2189
02:00:55.199 --> 02:00:57.159
<v Speaker 4>links and I'll see if I want to debate him.

2190
02:00:58.920 --> 02:01:02.119
<v Speaker 4>Let's see. I gotta calm down. Things are getting getting

2191
02:01:02.199 --> 02:01:06.680
<v Speaker 4>hot and spicy, getting heated up in here. We didn't

2192
02:01:06.680 --> 02:01:09.079
<v Speaker 4>even get into the good Mormon stuff. It was getting

2193
02:01:09.119 --> 02:01:12.840
<v Speaker 4>too stupid. It was just gonna turn just ridiculous. By

2194
02:01:12.880 --> 02:01:16.680
<v Speaker 4>the way, there's like multiple passages that go through the

2195
02:01:16.760 --> 02:01:18.920
<v Speaker 4>cessation of the Office of problem. That's just one of

2196
02:01:19.000 --> 02:01:21.880
<v Speaker 4>the texts. We could go into the Zechari thirteen. We

2197
02:01:21.960 --> 02:01:24.520
<v Speaker 4>could go into the Book of Jude. I mean, there's

2198
02:01:24.600 --> 02:01:29.199
<v Speaker 4>many passages that even once some are explicit, some implicit,

2199
02:01:29.399 --> 02:01:33.159
<v Speaker 4>that there's a finality to revelation in the person of

2200
02:01:33.279 --> 02:01:39.600
<v Speaker 4>Christ and the time of the apostles. The faith once

2201
02:01:39.680 --> 02:01:41.840
<v Speaker 4>We're all delivered to the Saints. There's no new profits.

2202
02:01:42.039 --> 02:01:48.479
<v Speaker 4>This immediately cuts off Muslims and Mormons. Caleb was, oh,

2203
02:01:48.680 --> 02:01:49.239
<v Speaker 4>so is my.

2204
02:01:49.279 --> 02:01:50.680
<v Speaker 2>My quality good? Yeah?

2205
02:01:51.560 --> 02:01:53.680
<v Speaker 39>All right, yeah, I just realized like halfway through that

2206
02:01:53.680 --> 02:01:56.319
<v Speaker 39>you're actually a Christian. So I don't have anything to debate.

2207
02:01:56.760 --> 02:01:59.199
<v Speaker 39>But would you mind if I just like says or shit, No,

2208
02:02:00.119 --> 02:02:03.920
<v Speaker 39>this is about what I'm just gonna like talk about

2209
02:02:04.319 --> 02:02:05.840
<v Speaker 39>some ship to disprove.

2210
02:02:05.479 --> 02:02:06.960
<v Speaker 2>A couple of religions for the chatters.

2211
02:02:07.159 --> 02:02:09.359
<v Speaker 4>No, this is not like where you come and give

2212
02:02:09.439 --> 02:02:18.479
<v Speaker 4>a sermon. What's up? Let's see who's next. Ms Mark.

2213
02:02:23.720 --> 02:02:25.159
<v Speaker 4>By the way, I have a old video on the

2214
02:02:25.279 --> 02:02:28.000
<v Speaker 4>cessation of the office of the prophet in the and

2215
02:02:28.079 --> 02:02:30.479
<v Speaker 4>it's in the Old Testament sense like new revelations like

2216
02:02:31.119 --> 02:02:35.119
<v Speaker 4>Mohammad and Joseph Smith. It's on my clips channel. So

2217
02:02:35.159 --> 02:02:37.479
<v Speaker 4>if you come over here to for people who want

2218
02:02:37.520 --> 02:02:39.680
<v Speaker 4>the full Because this came up with that Muslim girl

2219
02:02:39.720 --> 02:02:42.000
<v Speaker 4>the other day. She was asking the same question, because

2220
02:02:43.039 --> 02:02:47.840
<v Speaker 4>what do you mean there's no new prophit uh, And

2221
02:02:48.439 --> 02:02:51.800
<v Speaker 4>let's see what the video is called that. I mean,

2222
02:02:51.880 --> 02:03:02.560
<v Speaker 4>you can come on here. What's your position? So what

2223
02:03:02.680 --> 02:03:04.520
<v Speaker 4>are you talking about? The come on you're gonna come

2224
02:03:04.560 --> 02:03:07.479
<v Speaker 4>on here and gibber a bunch of Arabic gibberish, or

2225
02:03:07.479 --> 02:03:10.600
<v Speaker 4>are you gonna make an argument? They actually think this

2226
02:03:10.760 --> 02:03:13.039
<v Speaker 4>is like an argument like that, I'm not kidding. Remember

2227
02:03:13.079 --> 02:03:15.640
<v Speaker 4>when we saw this with a post prophet, right, like

2228
02:03:16.079 --> 02:03:19.960
<v Speaker 4>when Muhammed a. Job starts singing to Jordan Peterson. Jordan

2229
02:03:20.039 --> 02:03:20.600
<v Speaker 4>Peterson is.

2230
02:03:20.600 --> 02:03:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Like, why do you do that?

2231
02:03:22.600 --> 02:03:22.640
<v Speaker 7>What?

2232
02:03:22.920 --> 02:03:23.279
<v Speaker 6>What's that?

2233
02:03:23.520 --> 02:03:23.560
<v Speaker 2>What?

2234
02:03:23.800 --> 02:03:25.399
<v Speaker 4>How do you why do you know when to do that?

2235
02:03:25.560 --> 02:03:31.000
<v Speaker 2>What is that? So? Why did you do that?

2236
02:03:32.000 --> 02:03:34.319
<v Speaker 4>And like, in the in their mind, that's an argument.

2237
02:03:35.079 --> 02:03:38.560
<v Speaker 4>They're like, he owned he owned him. He's singing Arabic.

2238
02:03:38.840 --> 02:03:41.319
<v Speaker 6>He owned him, we owned him.

2239
02:03:41.359 --> 02:03:41.920
<v Speaker 15>Brought up.

2240
02:03:45.560 --> 02:03:57.319
<v Speaker 4>Where is the No New Revelations? I can't remember if

2241
02:03:57.319 --> 02:04:02.720
<v Speaker 4>it's an older video or I think it's older. Yes,

2242
02:04:05.079 --> 02:04:19.000
<v Speaker 4>go back a little bit. I want to pull this

2243
02:04:19.159 --> 02:04:21.479
<v Speaker 4>up because it keeps coming up where people think that

2244
02:04:23.119 --> 02:04:27.119
<v Speaker 4>there's this ongoing office of the prophet, which like because

2245
02:04:27.119 --> 02:04:29.279
<v Speaker 4>if there's not the ongoing office of the prophet, then

2246
02:04:29.439 --> 02:04:32.079
<v Speaker 4>that cuts out a lot of these cults right in Islam.

2247
02:04:33.119 --> 02:04:40.840
<v Speaker 4>But I can't remember what I titled that video No

2248
02:04:41.039 --> 02:04:49.600
<v Speaker 4>New I should I tell that something simpler? So today

2249
02:04:50.039 --> 02:04:52.439
<v Speaker 4>today is open debate. Please do not come with all

2250
02:04:52.479 --> 02:04:56.680
<v Speaker 4>of your catechumen questions. It's not FAQ, it's gigantic text

2251
02:04:56.760 --> 02:05:00.960
<v Speaker 4>to the top that says debate. So this is debate day,

2252
02:05:04.479 --> 02:05:05.960
<v Speaker 4>and if you want sports stream, you can send a

2253
02:05:06.000 --> 02:05:07.760
<v Speaker 4>super chat. I gotta find this. I know, I know,

2254
02:05:07.840 --> 02:05:12.479
<v Speaker 4>I made a clipse video of this moon beavers. That's

2255
02:05:12.560 --> 02:05:12.760
<v Speaker 4>not it.

2256
02:05:13.119 --> 02:05:24.600
<v Speaker 40>Okay, it's not any of those.

2257
02:05:35.760 --> 02:05:39.279
<v Speaker 4>I just pulled it up. I thought when that Muslim

2258
02:05:39.279 --> 02:05:52.119
<v Speaker 4>girl called in, maybe I never made a clip. I

2259
02:05:52.159 --> 02:05:59.159
<v Speaker 4>don't know, no, because I remember it was fda Is

2260
02:05:59.239 --> 02:06:02.399
<v Speaker 4>on the call and we we're talking. Does anybody remember

2261
02:06:02.439 --> 02:06:02.800
<v Speaker 4>this clip?

2262
02:06:02.960 --> 02:06:03.000
<v Speaker 2>No?

2263
02:06:03.119 --> 02:06:05.680
<v Speaker 4>New, I don't know. Let's have the finest other time.

2264
02:06:07.199 --> 02:06:07.560
<v Speaker 2>W K.

2265
02:06:08.439 --> 02:06:11.119
<v Speaker 4>Please don't ask me Orthodox questions basic Orthodox questions.

2266
02:06:17.520 --> 02:06:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Hey, so I have a question that's not really like

2267
02:06:20.680 --> 02:06:23.239
<v Speaker 2>basic simply.

2268
02:06:23.319 --> 02:06:28.079
<v Speaker 41>I hear Andrew Wilson frequently, and I've asked my you know,

2269
02:06:29.560 --> 02:06:33.720
<v Speaker 41>priest about this, and a sentinarian and everything, and I'm

2270
02:06:33.760 --> 02:06:38.760
<v Speaker 41>getting different answers from everybody on the using of the

2271
02:06:38.840 --> 02:06:42.039
<v Speaker 41>Eucharis in a Roman Catholic church.

2272
02:06:43.159 --> 02:06:47.479
<v Speaker 2>Like I hear that andrews says I could go down

2273
02:06:47.520 --> 02:06:50.840
<v Speaker 2>to a Catholic church and take communion there, but they

2274
02:06:50.880 --> 02:06:51.960
<v Speaker 2>can't do it with us.

2275
02:06:52.720 --> 02:06:55.760
<v Speaker 41>And then I hear Roman Catholics say the same thing,

2276
02:06:55.960 --> 02:06:56.640
<v Speaker 41>just the reverse.

2277
02:06:57.960 --> 02:07:00.319
<v Speaker 4>No, Roman Catholics cannot commune an Orthodox Church.

2278
02:07:03.199 --> 02:07:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but could I go to like Sacred Heart and

2279
02:07:06.279 --> 02:07:07.680
<v Speaker 2>commune there? Yeah?

2280
02:07:07.800 --> 02:07:09.920
<v Speaker 4>But what's what what's what's the point.

2281
02:07:12.079 --> 02:07:14.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm just trying to get just an answer, whether it's

2282
02:07:14.279 --> 02:07:16.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, prohibited or not. No.

2283
02:07:17.600 --> 02:07:20.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Robin Catholics are are all over the place,

2284
02:07:20.680 --> 02:07:22.640
<v Speaker 4>so yeah, I'm sure they'll let you. But the norm

2285
02:07:22.720 --> 02:07:26.039
<v Speaker 4>in the Orthodox Church is only baptized Orthodox can commune,

2286
02:07:26.359 --> 02:07:33.680
<v Speaker 4>and the priest says that in every liturgy. Yeah, so,

2287
02:07:33.960 --> 02:07:36.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean it's not it's not even controversial. I'm not

2288
02:07:36.600 --> 02:07:38.880
<v Speaker 4>trying to be rude to you, but like, that's not

2289
02:07:39.039 --> 02:07:43.520
<v Speaker 4>even controversial. And that is a very fac question. Elijah,

2290
02:07:46.319 --> 02:07:48.439
<v Speaker 4>Does anybody know where this video is that I'm talking about.

2291
02:07:48.520 --> 02:07:53.800
<v Speaker 4>That's a clip of like it's from a live tream

2292
02:07:53.840 --> 02:07:56.079
<v Speaker 4>I did where we covered this whole question of whether

2293
02:07:56.159 --> 02:07:59.600
<v Speaker 4>there's no new there's no new revelations and new prophets

2294
02:07:59.760 --> 02:08:11.600
<v Speaker 4>some like that. Elijah, what's up? You have to unmute, man, guys,

2295
02:08:11.600 --> 02:08:19.479
<v Speaker 4>you gotta unmute. You have to turn your speaker on

2296
02:08:19.560 --> 02:08:22.600
<v Speaker 4>if you want to come talk, dude, you have to

2297
02:08:22.640 --> 02:08:25.039
<v Speaker 4>give Mike permissions so we can. There's no sound.

2298
02:08:31.520 --> 02:08:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Matt, Hey, what's up?

2299
02:08:43.960 --> 02:08:47.119
<v Speaker 12>And I'm sorry?

2300
02:08:48.439 --> 02:08:51.840
<v Speaker 2>How do you reconcile the fact that how do you

2301
02:08:51.880 --> 02:08:54.479
<v Speaker 2>reconcile the fact that in the boiblet says and the

2302
02:08:54.560 --> 02:09:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Gospel will be preached to the whole world, will be

2303
02:09:02.800 --> 02:09:05.399
<v Speaker 2>preached to the whole world. And but the schism kind of.

2304
02:09:05.399 --> 02:09:07.439
<v Speaker 42>Happened before was preaching to the whole world? I mean,

2305
02:09:08.000 --> 02:09:10.399
<v Speaker 42>surely the God he wants an orthodox coind.

2306
02:09:10.199 --> 02:09:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Of a world be to be preaching the whole world before.

2307
02:09:13.279 --> 02:09:15.720
<v Speaker 4>And Paul says the Gospels preaching every preaching and or

2308
02:09:15.760 --> 02:09:17.239
<v Speaker 4>having a Colossians, So what do you mean?

2309
02:09:19.000 --> 02:09:21.960
<v Speaker 42>Yeah, but it's preached by a Catholic point of background.

2310
02:09:22.079 --> 02:09:24.880
<v Speaker 4>Now, oh, so you think the entire first one thousand

2311
02:09:24.920 --> 02:09:26.199
<v Speaker 4>years of the church was Roman Catholic?

2312
02:09:28.000 --> 02:09:31.920
<v Speaker 2>No, the layer of years war, the what the later years?

2313
02:09:33.880 --> 02:09:36.199
<v Speaker 4>Okay, well, if the first thousand years weren't Roman Catholic,

2314
02:09:36.199 --> 02:09:38.239
<v Speaker 4>then the Roman Calolic churches in the historical church.

2315
02:09:40.680 --> 02:09:42.520
<v Speaker 42>I know, but it was it was more of the

2316
02:09:42.560 --> 02:09:44.960
<v Speaker 42>preacher not done in the later years, say, like you know,

2317
02:09:45.079 --> 02:09:47.279
<v Speaker 42>the sixteen hundreds when they went to the Americas.

2318
02:09:52.680 --> 02:09:53.880
<v Speaker 4>I don't understand the argument.

2319
02:09:54.359 --> 02:09:59.039
<v Speaker 2>What are you saying, Sorry, I have another question.

2320
02:10:00.279 --> 02:10:03.119
<v Speaker 4>You're saying that the entire world has been preached the

2321
02:10:03.239 --> 02:10:04.840
<v Speaker 4>Roman Catholic Gospels that you're saying.

2322
02:10:05.720 --> 02:10:07.479
<v Speaker 42>I'm not saying that it has been, but I'm saying

2323
02:10:07.520 --> 02:10:10.000
<v Speaker 42>that I would take the majority of it has been,

2324
02:10:10.159 --> 02:10:12.760
<v Speaker 42>rather than the Orthodox to it like THEE would.

2325
02:10:13.319 --> 02:10:16.199
<v Speaker 4>Well, but if the first thousand years of Christianity was Orthodox,

2326
02:10:16.319 --> 02:10:19.119
<v Speaker 4>that's not true, I know.

2327
02:10:19.239 --> 02:10:21.279
<v Speaker 42>But the first thousand news of Christianity only brings you

2328
02:10:21.399 --> 02:10:24.479
<v Speaker 42>so far. So say, when was America discovered? The America's

2329
02:10:24.560 --> 02:10:28.840
<v Speaker 42>got the Catholic kind of introduction to Christianity.

2330
02:10:28.960 --> 02:10:33.039
<v Speaker 4>No, No, the first Christianity here might have actually been orthodox.

2331
02:10:35.960 --> 02:10:38.399
<v Speaker 42>Well, you have been taught with probably the Conquistators, which

2332
02:10:38.399 --> 02:10:39.520
<v Speaker 42>are primarily Roman Cathelic.

2333
02:10:39.600 --> 02:10:43.039
<v Speaker 4>Well, there's evidence that there was actually Orthodoxy prior to that.

2334
02:10:43.840 --> 02:10:47.079
<v Speaker 4>Perhaps there's certain vikings that might have come, but it

2335
02:10:47.159 --> 02:10:50.399
<v Speaker 4>doesn't even matter because at first or whatever, Like I mean,

2336
02:10:50.920 --> 02:10:52.680
<v Speaker 4>it's a question of what's true. It's not a question

2337
02:10:52.760 --> 02:10:55.439
<v Speaker 4>of numbers. So this is an often Roman Catholic used

2338
02:10:55.479 --> 02:10:58.239
<v Speaker 4>argument that it's numbers that prove things. But I mean

2339
02:10:58.760 --> 02:11:01.239
<v Speaker 4>does that mean that arian is was true because Arianism

2340
02:11:01.359 --> 02:11:02.960
<v Speaker 4>was the dominant number in the fourth century.

2341
02:11:04.039 --> 02:11:05.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying it's more dominant.

2342
02:11:05.239 --> 02:11:07.119
<v Speaker 4>But what of the saying He did say that though,

2343
02:11:07.159 --> 02:11:08.239
<v Speaker 4>because you said it's numbers.

2344
02:11:09.720 --> 02:11:12.279
<v Speaker 42>No, But what I'm getting at is in the voyebo

2345
02:11:12.319 --> 02:11:16.880
<v Speaker 42>doesn't even say that Christianity will be preached to all

2346
02:11:16.960 --> 02:11:17.439
<v Speaker 42>the nations.

2347
02:11:17.600 --> 02:11:21.199
<v Speaker 4>But what's the w Well yeah, but but I mean,

2348
02:11:21.880 --> 02:11:24.119
<v Speaker 4>the Romancality Church could go away and in the next

2349
02:11:24.199 --> 02:11:26.439
<v Speaker 4>thousand years Orthodoxy preach it to the rest of the world.

2350
02:11:26.600 --> 02:11:29.039
<v Speaker 4>So how is that going to be a proof for

2351
02:11:29.199 --> 02:11:31.600
<v Speaker 4>Roman Catholicism if there's I mean, that's just based on

2352
02:11:31.760 --> 02:11:33.119
<v Speaker 4>like things we don't know in the future.

2353
02:11:34.000 --> 02:11:35.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a good point. That's good point.

2354
02:11:35.479 --> 02:11:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Ye here, what was your other question?

2355
02:11:40.079 --> 02:11:41.840
<v Speaker 2>I heard this on the debate and I continue to

2356
02:11:41.880 --> 02:11:42.520
<v Speaker 2>get an answer for it.

2357
02:11:42.760 --> 02:11:45.159
<v Speaker 42>Boy and eighties said this. He said, if God is

2358
02:11:45.359 --> 02:11:47.960
<v Speaker 42>a perfect being, and why does he even feel the

2359
02:11:48.039 --> 02:11:48.720
<v Speaker 42>need to create?

2360
02:11:50.479 --> 02:11:51.760
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't not perfect himself.

2361
02:11:52.239 --> 02:11:55.239
<v Speaker 4>It wasn't a need. It was an overflowing of divine goodness,

2362
02:11:55.319 --> 02:11:58.159
<v Speaker 4>which is what Saint maxim As another church father, says.

2363
02:11:58.199 --> 02:12:02.800
<v Speaker 4>So he wanted to express even more of his goodness

2364
02:12:02.880 --> 02:12:05.560
<v Speaker 4>by having other beings that could share in communion and

2365
02:12:05.640 --> 02:12:09.800
<v Speaker 4>goodness with him, and so he was sufficient in terms

2366
02:12:09.880 --> 02:12:17.119
<v Speaker 4>of the intertrinitarian life from all existence. Yes, this is

2367
02:12:17.199 --> 02:12:20.960
<v Speaker 4>for people who disagree. So please don't bring me a

2368
02:12:20.960 --> 02:12:23.960
<v Speaker 4>whole bunch of orthodox I f AQ questions. Don't I don't.

2369
02:12:24.000 --> 02:12:27.039
<v Speaker 4>Don't ask me about your fasting and your all this stuff.

2370
02:12:27.039 --> 02:12:38.680
<v Speaker 4>And I want to talk about that glove. You don't

2371
02:12:38.680 --> 02:12:42.920
<v Speaker 4>even have your mic on. Man, You've been begging to

2372
02:12:42.960 --> 02:12:44.640
<v Speaker 4>talk this entire time. You don't have a mic on.

2373
02:12:46.039 --> 02:12:46.239
<v Speaker 15>Eric?

2374
02:12:46.680 --> 02:12:47.039
<v Speaker 4>What's up?

2375
02:12:47.119 --> 02:12:47.279
<v Speaker 2>Eric?

2376
02:12:54.560 --> 02:12:58.640
<v Speaker 16>Hdo thank you? I have a question regarding the Bible.

2377
02:12:59.359 --> 02:13:04.199
<v Speaker 16>There is a Jesus says that every said a man

2378
02:13:04.640 --> 02:13:06.720
<v Speaker 16>who can I'm cast out. You meant in the name

2379
02:13:06.800 --> 02:13:07.279
<v Speaker 16>of Jesus.

2380
02:13:07.960 --> 02:13:09.640
<v Speaker 2>So I want I want to know.

2381
02:13:11.359 --> 02:13:15.079
<v Speaker 16>Possible that we all we don't have to be about

2382
02:13:15.119 --> 02:13:16.279
<v Speaker 16>a dis denomination.

2383
02:13:16.479 --> 02:13:19.439
<v Speaker 4>But no, because after that he says that this person

2384
02:13:19.520 --> 02:13:22.359
<v Speaker 4>will not forever be apart from us, but he will

2385
02:13:22.399 --> 02:13:26.039
<v Speaker 4>also be eventually with us. An Act eighteen and nineteen,

2386
02:13:26.079 --> 02:13:28.840
<v Speaker 4>when the apostles go out, they bring the disciples that

2387
02:13:29.000 --> 02:13:30.640
<v Speaker 4>had not heard about the Holy Spirit or had not

2388
02:13:30.760 --> 02:13:42.319
<v Speaker 4>been christmated under the episcopacy. But good question, Dave yep.

2389
02:13:42.399 --> 02:13:45.079
<v Speaker 43>I'm sorry about I'm sorry about wasting your time last

2390
02:13:45.079 --> 02:13:45.560
<v Speaker 43>time I came on.

2391
02:13:45.720 --> 02:13:47.119
<v Speaker 2>But a serious question.

2392
02:13:47.199 --> 02:13:48.840
<v Speaker 4>I don't remember what we're talking about, what you're talking about.

2393
02:13:50.279 --> 02:13:52.880
<v Speaker 43>I'm not orthodox, I said, I was aspiring to be.

2394
02:13:53.000 --> 02:13:56.600
<v Speaker 43>But my question wasn't about catechumud or whatever.

2395
02:13:57.000 --> 02:13:57.239
<v Speaker 8>Okay.

2396
02:14:00.000 --> 02:14:03.199
<v Speaker 43>The question was with regard to one of your accusations

2397
02:14:03.239 --> 02:14:08.239
<v Speaker 43>against Protestantism. Okay, how the damnation of the son logically

2398
02:14:08.359 --> 02:14:09.920
<v Speaker 43>concludes to Nestorianism?

2399
02:14:10.279 --> 02:14:10.600
<v Speaker 4>Correct?

2400
02:14:10.600 --> 02:14:12.880
<v Speaker 2>I was hoping you help me understand that a little bit.

2401
02:14:13.319 --> 02:14:15.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's just a denial of the trinity. So the

2402
02:14:15.880 --> 02:14:18.000
<v Speaker 4>Son is a divine person, he's the second person of

2403
02:14:18.039 --> 02:14:20.119
<v Speaker 4>the Godhead. So how could he be damned by the

2404
02:14:20.159 --> 02:14:22.439
<v Speaker 4>Father when he shares the same will, the same nature

2405
02:14:22.800 --> 02:14:24.920
<v Speaker 4>and the Father and the Spirit and dwell him. To

2406
02:14:25.079 --> 02:14:27.159
<v Speaker 4>damn him would be to split the trinity. So it's

2407
02:14:27.159 --> 02:14:31.199
<v Speaker 4>actually worse than just an historian, it's actually arian mm hmm.

2408
02:14:32.720 --> 02:14:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay. I I read Hermann Bavnick a little bit ago.

2409
02:14:38.960 --> 02:14:42.119
<v Speaker 2>I think, I think, oh, I'm so sorry.

2410
02:14:43.560 --> 02:14:49.720
<v Speaker 43>And he addressed this particular objection, and I promise I'm

2411
02:14:49.720 --> 02:14:51.920
<v Speaker 43>gonna butcher this. But he said something in regard to

2412
02:14:53.119 --> 02:14:55.279
<v Speaker 43>the subsistence of the son.

2413
02:14:58.760 --> 02:15:02.720
<v Speaker 4>Subsistence means per so the Sun is the subsistence.

2414
02:15:03.760 --> 02:15:06.800
<v Speaker 43>So he said something with regard to like the subsistence

2415
02:15:06.840 --> 02:15:09.359
<v Speaker 43>of the son fully present on the cross.

2416
02:15:09.720 --> 02:15:10.000
<v Speaker 2>With that.

2417
02:15:12.199 --> 02:15:15.279
<v Speaker 4>Subsistence means person, that's the same thing as the son.

2418
02:15:16.680 --> 02:15:19.640
<v Speaker 4>So I don't know, this is just stating that he's

2419
02:15:19.680 --> 02:15:24.359
<v Speaker 4>the second person. How does that answer this question? I

2420
02:15:24.399 --> 02:15:25.199
<v Speaker 4>don't think he does.

2421
02:15:25.800 --> 02:15:30.000
<v Speaker 2>That's just what I read. I wasn't sure if if

2422
02:15:30.039 --> 02:15:30.560
<v Speaker 2>it did or not.

2423
02:15:30.680 --> 02:15:33.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean it actually it proves the point because the

2424
02:15:33.720 --> 02:15:36.840
<v Speaker 4>subject that's on the cross is the divine person of

2425
02:15:36.880 --> 02:15:40.840
<v Speaker 4>the Sun, the second subject in the triad, the trinity. Right,

2426
02:15:41.359 --> 02:15:44.000
<v Speaker 4>So when he says, my God, my God, why have

2427
02:15:44.079 --> 02:15:46.680
<v Speaker 4>you forsaken me? If that's damnation, then that's the son

2428
02:15:46.800 --> 02:15:49.399
<v Speaker 4>being damned by the father, and that's actually classical Reformation

2429
02:15:49.520 --> 02:15:55.000
<v Speaker 4>the elogy. Okay, all right, that's okay, good questions. I'm

2430
02:15:55.000 --> 02:15:56.960
<v Speaker 4>not trying to be rude to you, but tonight was

2431
02:15:57.000 --> 02:16:01.039
<v Speaker 4>a lot of Uh, we've had some sass so far. Kamala,

2432
02:16:01.119 --> 02:16:04.479
<v Speaker 4>what's up? We've got some come all up in the

2433
02:16:04.560 --> 02:16:08.359
<v Speaker 4>Kamala Unism. Come mama, what's up coming with hers?

2434
02:16:08.920 --> 02:16:09.079
<v Speaker 7>Oh?

2435
02:16:09.159 --> 02:16:13.439
<v Speaker 2>Bro yo, it's a quick question. It's really nothing like crazy.

2436
02:16:13.560 --> 02:16:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Let me just pull it up. I affirm your words

2437
02:16:16.000 --> 02:16:16.359
<v Speaker 2>and stuff.

2438
02:16:16.600 --> 02:16:19.119
<v Speaker 4>It's just you affirm my words. Uh huh, your troll?

2439
02:16:19.239 --> 02:16:19.680
<v Speaker 4>What do you want?

2440
02:16:20.279 --> 02:16:20.319
<v Speaker 10>No?

2441
02:16:20.520 --> 02:16:26.000
<v Speaker 2>I should I have a question. So you know, papias correct.

2442
02:16:27.079 --> 02:16:34.399
<v Speaker 4>Papias, papayas, papayas. What are you talking about? I have words.

2443
02:16:34.559 --> 02:16:38.159
<v Speaker 4>Anybody who starts with this weird fake voice, I have

2444
02:16:38.319 --> 02:16:43.719
<v Speaker 4>fired your words. Dude, I already know you're trolling. Shiro.

2445
02:16:45.280 --> 02:16:51.799
<v Speaker 4>I affirm your words. Dude's name was Kamala. Come on, Shiro,

2446
02:16:59.520 --> 02:17:02.159
<v Speaker 4>I mean a hi Hi.

2447
02:17:02.399 --> 02:17:07.719
<v Speaker 2>Can you hear me? Yes? So, I don't like this

2448
02:17:07.799 --> 02:17:10.440
<v Speaker 2>is not a debate thing, but I just want to ask.

2449
02:17:12.079 --> 02:17:15.799
<v Speaker 44>I like not an agnostic, but I adopted exist of God,

2450
02:17:15.840 --> 02:17:18.440
<v Speaker 44>and I want to know what to guarantees that exist

2451
02:17:19.200 --> 02:17:23.360
<v Speaker 44>being in that presents and energy matter, Like why the

2452
02:17:23.399 --> 02:17:24.159
<v Speaker 44>guarantees God?

2453
02:17:24.239 --> 02:17:24.399
<v Speaker 7>You know.

2454
02:17:26.399 --> 02:17:27.639
<v Speaker 4>The transondent argument?

2455
02:17:30.399 --> 02:17:31.879
<v Speaker 2>Can you give me? Yes?

2456
02:17:32.000 --> 02:17:34.760
<v Speaker 4>You can go watch all the videos on it. Stan,

2457
02:17:41.879 --> 02:17:42.319
<v Speaker 4>what's up?

2458
02:17:42.399 --> 02:17:44.079
<v Speaker 2>Jay? Hey?

2459
02:17:45.319 --> 02:17:47.200
<v Speaker 45>I was one of the I'm on your side, but

2460
02:17:47.200 --> 02:17:48.799
<v Speaker 45>I was wondering if this is a good argument for

2461
02:17:49.479 --> 02:17:52.319
<v Speaker 45>if God begets God every other being they were only

2462
02:17:52.399 --> 02:17:55.559
<v Speaker 45>able to beget the same nature, so God can't be

2463
02:17:55.760 --> 02:17:57.520
<v Speaker 45>why would God beget a lesser nature?

2464
02:17:57.559 --> 02:17:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Being? Right?

2465
02:17:58.879 --> 02:17:59.319
<v Speaker 4>I agree?

2466
02:17:59.440 --> 02:18:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, that's all I want of them.

2467
02:18:02.680 --> 02:18:04.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that's a good point to make with

2468
02:18:05.360 --> 02:18:07.719
<v Speaker 4>you know, people that would say deny the deity of

2469
02:18:07.760 --> 02:18:11.440
<v Speaker 4>the sun or whatever, like if God's begetting then you know,

2470
02:18:11.559 --> 02:18:13.840
<v Speaker 4>if you had an arian who said that he's begetting

2471
02:18:13.879 --> 02:18:16.040
<v Speaker 4>a creature, well that doesn't make any sense to because

2472
02:18:16.079 --> 02:18:27.920
<v Speaker 4>to beget presupposes the same nature. Right, that's a good point, Hans, Right,

2473
02:18:28.200 --> 02:18:28.520
<v Speaker 4>go ahead.

2474
02:18:29.920 --> 02:18:32.079
<v Speaker 29>Hey, Jay, I just wanted to say, first of all,

2475
02:18:32.120 --> 02:18:35.079
<v Speaker 29>thank you for putting this platform for all of us

2476
02:18:35.159 --> 02:18:36.639
<v Speaker 29>to force our opinions.

2477
02:18:38.959 --> 02:18:43.079
<v Speaker 24>Just from a general perspective, do you believe that Jesus

2478
02:18:43.200 --> 02:18:43.639
<v Speaker 24>wanted to.

2479
02:18:45.520 --> 02:18:47.680
<v Speaker 8>His intention was for the church to be united?

2480
02:18:49.239 --> 02:18:49.440
<v Speaker 4>Yes?

2481
02:18:49.959 --> 02:18:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Well I actually agree with you in terms of

2482
02:18:53.479 --> 02:18:57.159
<v Speaker 2>the corruption of the Roman Catholic Church. But do you

2483
02:18:57.239 --> 02:18:59.879
<v Speaker 2>not see that the Orthodox is Christianity.

2484
02:19:00.239 --> 02:19:03.200
<v Speaker 29>Emphasizes national churches and decentralized authority.

2485
02:19:04.959 --> 02:19:06.959
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, and that's what you see in the

2486
02:19:07.000 --> 02:19:08.000
<v Speaker 4>ecumenical councils.

2487
02:19:08.159 --> 02:19:12.840
<v Speaker 29>So yeah, and would you would you suggest or would

2488
02:19:12.879 --> 02:19:17.840
<v Speaker 29>you argue that this would weaken the church's influence.

2489
02:19:19.600 --> 02:19:21.239
<v Speaker 2>Rather than I think.

2490
02:19:21.120 --> 02:19:24.399
<v Speaker 4>It's I think it's I think it's natural because Jesus said,

2491
02:19:24.440 --> 02:19:27.319
<v Speaker 4>go out and preach the Gospel to the ethnois the nations.

2492
02:19:27.479 --> 02:19:29.360
<v Speaker 4>Those that's who he says in the Great Commission to

2493
02:19:29.399 --> 02:19:31.479
<v Speaker 4>go convert. When you go through the history of the

2494
02:19:31.559 --> 02:19:34.680
<v Speaker 4>Roman Empire, that's that's the nations that convert. When they

2495
02:19:34.719 --> 02:19:37.959
<v Speaker 4>come to the ecumenical councils, they're represented as national bishops.

2496
02:19:38.280 --> 02:19:41.959
<v Speaker 4>You even have the Autocephalish Church of Cyprus recognize that

2497
02:19:42.040 --> 02:19:44.399
<v Speaker 4>the Council of Ephesus. So this makes perfect sense.

2498
02:19:45.559 --> 02:19:47.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. True, you could argue it's natural, but is it?

2499
02:19:48.280 --> 02:19:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Is it what Christ intended?

2500
02:19:49.920 --> 02:19:52.479
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, because it's any I mean Christ guides the ecumenical

2501
02:19:52.520 --> 02:19:53.399
<v Speaker 4>councils absolutely.

2502
02:19:54.799 --> 02:19:57.120
<v Speaker 29>Who's the one who's the voice of the Orthodox Church?

2503
02:19:58.239 --> 02:19:59.440
<v Speaker 29>Who's the who's the authority?

2504
02:19:59.600 --> 02:20:00.600
<v Speaker 4>Christ and Holy Schort?

2505
02:20:02.120 --> 02:20:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, how do I how do I find out

2506
02:20:05.719 --> 02:20:06.360
<v Speaker 2>what Christ.

2507
02:20:06.200 --> 02:20:10.680
<v Speaker 29>Wants in the Orthodox I I agree with you with

2508
02:20:10.760 --> 02:20:12.639
<v Speaker 29>the Pope, the Pope especially.

2509
02:20:12.399 --> 02:20:15.159
<v Speaker 4>This, Well, then if you agree, then the then the

2510
02:20:15.319 --> 02:20:18.319
<v Speaker 4>then you can't ask me a Roman Catholic presupposition about

2511
02:20:18.360 --> 02:20:21.120
<v Speaker 4>our church. So you're basically saying, where's the person in

2512
02:20:21.200 --> 02:20:23.600
<v Speaker 4>the Orthodox Church? Is like the pope. There isn't one,

2513
02:20:24.680 --> 02:20:31.399
<v Speaker 4>but it's it's the institution itself is is Uh, it's decentralized.

2514
02:20:30.879 --> 02:20:36.040
<v Speaker 29>Far greater that rather than having a decentralized.

2515
02:20:36.760 --> 02:20:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Institution like Orthodox Christianity.

2516
02:20:39.319 --> 02:20:41.879
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's not the Roman Catholic position because Vatican One

2517
02:20:41.920 --> 02:20:45.120
<v Speaker 4>does not say that the Romancallic Church is a vaster church.

2518
02:20:45.239 --> 02:20:46.920
<v Speaker 4>It puts everything on the guy in Rome.

2519
02:20:50.200 --> 02:20:52.360
<v Speaker 2>I look anyway, I just I want to thank you

2520
02:20:52.479 --> 02:20:53.280
<v Speaker 2>and appreciate.

2521
02:20:53.319 --> 02:20:56.000
<v Speaker 4>I appreciate. Yeah, good questions. Yeah, I'm not not trying

2522
02:20:56.000 --> 02:20:56.959
<v Speaker 4>to be combative. I'm just.

2523
02:20:58.840 --> 02:20:59.040
<v Speaker 2>To me.

2524
02:20:59.159 --> 02:21:02.920
<v Speaker 4>It seems like the questions presupposed, you know, like, well,

2525
02:21:02.959 --> 02:21:06.639
<v Speaker 4>where's your Roman Catholic papal figure in your joy? We

2526
02:21:06.680 --> 02:21:08.760
<v Speaker 4>don't want that, we don't need that. Hayes, what's up?

2527
02:21:10.079 --> 02:21:10.239
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

2528
02:21:10.280 --> 02:21:13.239
<v Speaker 4>I think for Roman Catholics it's just like it's inconceivable.

2529
02:21:13.280 --> 02:21:16.239
<v Speaker 4>They have a hard time believing that God could be

2530
02:21:16.399 --> 02:21:20.120
<v Speaker 4>fully present in the local church, which is the Orthodox view.

2531
02:21:20.600 --> 02:21:24.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Catholicity for us is not one guy over

2532
02:21:24.200 --> 02:21:26.719
<v Speaker 4>in Rome or one place over in Rome, which doesn't

2533
02:21:26.760 --> 02:21:28.959
<v Speaker 4>even make sense in terms of the Roman Catholic idea

2534
02:21:29.120 --> 02:21:33.280
<v Speaker 4>of Catholicity. Catholicity is the fullness of the faith at

2535
02:21:33.399 --> 02:21:36.680
<v Speaker 4>every local church. So there's no super bishop in Rome.

2536
02:21:36.959 --> 02:21:40.000
<v Speaker 4>He doesn't have super sacraments and supergrace that the local

2537
02:21:40.120 --> 02:21:42.959
<v Speaker 4>church doesn't have, and that blows the mind of Roman Catholics.

2538
02:21:45.319 --> 02:21:50.600
<v Speaker 4>Got dropped off. Okay, I'm not taking orthodox FAQs. Please

2539
02:21:50.639 --> 02:21:54.559
<v Speaker 4>don't ask me orthodox FAQ's, and I'm not going to

2540
02:21:54.639 --> 02:21:58.200
<v Speaker 4>go back to people who are trolling. What's up Russian name?

2541
02:22:02.600 --> 02:22:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Hey, j can you hear me?

2542
02:22:06.440 --> 02:22:09.399
<v Speaker 46>I'm an author of Christian from the MOULDI station. Firstly,

2543
02:22:09.399 --> 02:22:11.280
<v Speaker 46>I'd like to thank you for your work, and I

2544
02:22:11.639 --> 02:22:15.440
<v Speaker 46>have a rather quick question regarding Islam. What is his

2545
02:22:15.559 --> 02:22:19.200
<v Speaker 46>stand stands regarding the existence of Muhammad. Do you think

2546
02:22:19.280 --> 02:22:22.319
<v Speaker 46>he was a pagan, northy, heretical or he didn't exist

2547
02:22:22.399 --> 02:22:22.680
<v Speaker 46>at all?

2548
02:22:23.440 --> 02:22:23.719
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

2549
02:22:24.920 --> 02:22:26.879
<v Speaker 4>I have not looked into this question that people have

2550
02:22:26.959 --> 02:22:30.639
<v Speaker 4>been posing lately about his total non existence, so I

2551
02:22:30.680 --> 02:22:33.959
<v Speaker 4>mean there could be something to that. So far, I've

2552
02:22:34.040 --> 02:22:36.399
<v Speaker 4>just been operating under the assumption that he was a

2553
02:22:37.600 --> 02:22:45.479
<v Speaker 4>pagan gnostic in Nestorian person. Gabriel, he's here to debate Christians.

2554
02:22:46.920 --> 02:22:56.680
<v Speaker 47>Jibril, Hello, yep, hey, hello Jamon. I am Muslim and

2555
02:22:57.399 --> 02:22:59.799
<v Speaker 47>I have a questions. I know you make it this

2556
02:23:00.040 --> 02:23:05.920
<v Speaker 47>sinction between nature and personhood. But my question is that

2557
02:23:06.799 --> 02:23:09.959
<v Speaker 47>wouldn't you even if you distinguish the three persons you

2558
02:23:10.040 --> 02:23:11.280
<v Speaker 47>used to be polytheistic?

2559
02:23:13.120 --> 02:23:16.159
<v Speaker 4>So says two, I mean, are the Asharis polytheistic or

2560
02:23:16.200 --> 02:23:17.360
<v Speaker 4>the Salafi polytistic?

2561
02:23:18.159 --> 02:23:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, I just think that if you have three and

2562
02:23:21.479 --> 02:23:23.159
<v Speaker 2>you as you're describing.

2563
02:23:22.799 --> 02:23:24.840
<v Speaker 4>Okay, well what about seven? What about ninety nine?

2564
02:23:27.520 --> 02:23:27.920
<v Speaker 2>That's this?

2565
02:23:28.120 --> 02:23:30.399
<v Speaker 47>Doesn't I don't know what this has to do with

2566
02:23:30.680 --> 02:23:32.520
<v Speaker 47>your justification for the your.

2567
02:23:32.479 --> 02:23:35.239
<v Speaker 4>Position, because you have the same issue in Islam?

2568
02:23:35.399 --> 02:23:38.040
<v Speaker 2>So what do you mean, No, we don't we believe

2569
02:23:38.079 --> 02:23:38.639
<v Speaker 2>in one God?

2570
02:23:39.399 --> 02:23:42.159
<v Speaker 4>What about the Asharis and the Autharis and the Salafis

2571
02:23:42.200 --> 02:23:44.079
<v Speaker 4>and all the debates over the uncreated Kuran and the

2572
02:23:44.120 --> 02:23:46.520
<v Speaker 4>seven attributes and the real distinctions?

2573
02:23:47.399 --> 02:23:49.079
<v Speaker 2>Okay, look I'm not here. Okay.

2574
02:23:49.239 --> 02:23:50.799
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah. So in other words, I don't want to

2575
02:23:50.840 --> 02:23:52.799
<v Speaker 4>deal with any problems in Islam. I only want to

2576
02:23:52.840 --> 02:23:54.799
<v Speaker 4>act like those problems in the Trinity.

2577
02:23:54.920 --> 02:23:58.200
<v Speaker 2>I can no, I can argue against this, but you're

2578
02:23:58.239 --> 02:24:00.600
<v Speaker 2>not making like you're not. Okay, let me tell you.

2579
02:24:01.079 --> 02:24:02.639
<v Speaker 4>Look, okay.

2580
02:24:06.120 --> 02:24:11.680
<v Speaker 2>To this of forgive me. Okay, so you believe, but

2581
02:24:11.799 --> 02:24:13.600
<v Speaker 2>how does it look? Should I agree that there's debate

2582
02:24:13.760 --> 02:24:14.840
<v Speaker 2>between in Islam.

2583
02:24:15.120 --> 02:24:17.440
<v Speaker 4>No, I'm not even pointing out that there's Look, there's

2584
02:24:17.440 --> 02:24:18.360
<v Speaker 4>debate a much Christians.

2585
02:24:18.399 --> 02:24:18.559
<v Speaker 2>Sure.

2586
02:24:18.600 --> 02:24:20.799
<v Speaker 4>The argument is not that there's a debate. The argument

2587
02:24:20.920 --> 02:24:23.680
<v Speaker 4>is that in your own position you have to account

2588
02:24:23.799 --> 02:24:26.799
<v Speaker 4>for unity and multiplicity in a law. And so you're

2589
02:24:26.879 --> 02:24:29.559
<v Speaker 4>just out of hands saying that my position is false

2590
02:24:29.639 --> 02:24:33.680
<v Speaker 4>because of any multiplicity in God. So why do you

2591
02:24:33.840 --> 02:24:38.040
<v Speaker 4>get a free pass on the shin and the right

2592
02:24:38.120 --> 02:24:39.159
<v Speaker 4>hand and all this stuff.

2593
02:24:39.840 --> 02:24:43.559
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, because that's like morphic language.

2594
02:24:43.200 --> 02:24:46.159
<v Speaker 4>That's not what we don't it says too, because even

2595
02:24:46.200 --> 02:24:49.159
<v Speaker 4>the Asharis who say that that's anthropomorphic language also believe

2596
02:24:49.159 --> 02:24:51.200
<v Speaker 4>that there's a real distinction between the attributes.

2597
02:24:54.159 --> 02:24:55.959
<v Speaker 2>Do you do you have fun bullying?

2598
02:24:56.079 --> 02:24:59.399
<v Speaker 4>Like I'm trying to bullying you. I literally brought up

2599
02:24:59.440 --> 02:25:01.440
<v Speaker 4>your aky to and you call that bullying. Don't play

2600
02:25:01.479 --> 02:25:03.280
<v Speaker 4>the victim. You came here to debate, and you gotta

2601
02:25:03.280 --> 02:25:07.280
<v Speaker 4>play victim. You guys are ridiculous. I have good contention, Okay,

2602
02:25:07.319 --> 02:25:10.319
<v Speaker 4>I can prove to you. The Bible's cut upt. Yeah,

2603
02:25:10.399 --> 02:25:12.399
<v Speaker 4>that script doesn't work when you come over here, dude,

2604
02:25:14.399 --> 02:25:17.920
<v Speaker 4>Jennifer plays a victim. I'm here to debate. He says

2605
02:25:18.399 --> 02:25:22.760
<v Speaker 4>his profile says here to debate Christians and Jews. He

2606
02:25:22.879 --> 02:25:26.719
<v Speaker 4>comes on, plays victim and says, I'm bullying him. Give

2607
02:25:26.760 --> 02:25:28.799
<v Speaker 4>me a break, dude, When he knows good and well,

2608
02:25:29.239 --> 02:25:32.520
<v Speaker 4>it's a very It's a totally fair question of why

2609
02:25:32.639 --> 02:25:35.879
<v Speaker 4>do I have to assume that multiplicity in my position

2610
02:25:36.559 --> 02:25:39.280
<v Speaker 4>is some form of polytheism. But when you talk about

2611
02:25:39.280 --> 02:25:42.280
<v Speaker 4>an uncreated Koran next to Allah, when you talk about

2612
02:25:42.319 --> 02:25:44.680
<v Speaker 4>attributes of a law super added to his essence, if

2613
02:25:44.719 --> 02:25:47.319
<v Speaker 4>you're in a Shari like then oh, that's a free

2614
02:25:47.399 --> 02:25:49.760
<v Speaker 4>pass bullying me.

2615
02:25:56.600 --> 02:25:57.440
<v Speaker 48>Hey, can you hear me?

2616
02:25:57.600 --> 02:25:57.799
<v Speaker 4>Yep?

2617
02:25:59.040 --> 02:26:03.959
<v Speaker 48>Hey, So I am a Protestant. I hold to a

2618
02:26:04.200 --> 02:26:07.120
<v Speaker 48>pre millennial view, and I wanted to ask you because

2619
02:26:07.120 --> 02:26:11.680
<v Speaker 48>I know you don't about release in twenty verse three,

2620
02:26:12.559 --> 02:26:16.200
<v Speaker 48>where Satan is taking to the bottomless pit and sealed

2621
02:26:16.440 --> 02:26:19.280
<v Speaker 48>so that he should deceive the nations no more. If

2622
02:26:19.639 --> 02:26:22.760
<v Speaker 48>the millennium is not a future event, what does it

2623
02:26:23.000 --> 02:26:25.520
<v Speaker 48>mean that Satan is sealed that he can no longer

2624
02:26:25.840 --> 02:26:26.920
<v Speaker 48>deceive nations?

2625
02:26:28.079 --> 02:26:32.559
<v Speaker 4>It's an ongoing, present reality because the millennium is identified

2626
02:26:32.639 --> 02:26:34.879
<v Speaker 4>as the kingdom, and the kingdom is what Jesus set

2627
02:26:34.920 --> 02:26:36.879
<v Speaker 4>up at his first advent. That's why this's not a

2628
02:26:36.959 --> 02:26:40.079
<v Speaker 4>literal thousand year millennium anymore than God only owns the

2629
02:26:40.159 --> 02:26:42.959
<v Speaker 4>cattle on one thousand hills and not the cattle on

2630
02:26:43.000 --> 02:26:44.000
<v Speaker 4>the thousand and one hill.

2631
02:26:45.600 --> 02:26:49.079
<v Speaker 48>So I guess that would be assuming that the millennium

2632
02:26:49.440 --> 02:26:51.799
<v Speaker 48>is like the start of the kingdom. In my view,

2633
02:26:52.000 --> 02:26:55.040
<v Speaker 48>the kingdom started of course at the ascension, and then

2634
02:26:55.120 --> 02:26:58.879
<v Speaker 48>the millennium is just a physical representation of that already.

2635
02:26:59.000 --> 02:27:02.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that physical representation is the Church because it says

2636
02:27:02.600 --> 02:27:05.399
<v Speaker 4>that it says that the first resurrection is those who

2637
02:27:05.479 --> 02:27:09.159
<v Speaker 4>are brought into that. That first resurrection is what Jesus

2638
02:27:09.159 --> 02:27:11.639
<v Speaker 4>talks about in John five when he says that you're

2639
02:27:11.760 --> 02:27:14.559
<v Speaker 4>raised in the spirit, and then there's bodily resurrects. So

2640
02:27:14.600 --> 02:27:16.840
<v Speaker 4>the first resurrection is baptism, is what I'm trying to say.

2641
02:27:18.479 --> 02:27:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay, it makes sense.

2642
02:27:21.479 --> 02:27:22.760
<v Speaker 16>Do you mean if I ask another question?

2643
02:27:23.040 --> 02:27:23.239
<v Speaker 4>Sure?

2644
02:27:24.760 --> 02:27:24.799
<v Speaker 2>So.

2645
02:27:25.399 --> 02:27:25.760
<v Speaker 16>In the.

2646
02:27:27.319 --> 02:27:29.120
<v Speaker 33>It's called the Christmas Victor model.

2647
02:27:29.200 --> 02:27:34.840
<v Speaker 4>For Orthodox that's the closest approximation to what we would

2648
02:27:34.879 --> 02:27:37.719
<v Speaker 4>say to a Protestant minded person. But there's much more

2649
02:27:37.799 --> 02:27:40.559
<v Speaker 4>than that, because, for example, a Lutheran might be believing

2650
02:27:40.680 --> 02:27:42.920
<v Speaker 4>christas Victor, but he believes that Christ was damned by

2651
02:27:42.959 --> 02:27:44.360
<v Speaker 4>the Father or something that we don't believe any of

2652
02:27:44.399 --> 02:27:47.959
<v Speaker 4>that nonsense for us christas victory, for us christas Victor

2653
02:27:48.040 --> 02:27:51.920
<v Speaker 4>includes that he descended into Hades and is resurrected, and

2654
02:27:52.600 --> 02:27:55.159
<v Speaker 4>and it sins to restore all human nature in the

2655
02:27:55.319 --> 02:27:58.079
<v Speaker 4>entire universe. So there's a cosmic scope to it. There's

2656
02:27:58.120 --> 02:28:00.079
<v Speaker 4>a heroin of Hades, and none of that is in

2657
02:28:00.120 --> 02:28:00.959
<v Speaker 4>any Protestantism.

2658
02:28:02.479 --> 02:28:08.360
<v Speaker 49>Okay, So I guess why would he have to take

2659
02:28:08.399 --> 02:28:12.639
<v Speaker 49>on human nature and experience death in order to defeat death?

2660
02:28:13.760 --> 02:28:16.559
<v Speaker 4>Because death is an angel, it's a demon, and it's

2661
02:28:16.600 --> 02:28:21.200
<v Speaker 4>a kingdom known as Hades. And so when Adam decided

2662
02:28:21.280 --> 02:28:24.879
<v Speaker 4>to leave God, he sort of covenanted with Satan and

2663
02:28:24.959 --> 02:28:27.319
<v Speaker 4>became a member of Satan's kingdom. And so when he dies,

2664
02:28:27.399 --> 02:28:30.239
<v Speaker 4>he goes down into Hades, which the Bible describes in many,

2665
02:28:30.239 --> 02:28:34.159
<v Speaker 4>many passages throughout the Old Testament. Jesus then came, as

2666
02:28:34.200 --> 02:28:36.920
<v Speaker 4>the New Testament says, to have the keys of death

2667
02:28:36.959 --> 02:28:40.159
<v Speaker 4>and Hades to destroy that whole realm, in that whole kingdom.

2668
02:28:42.840 --> 02:28:46.719
<v Speaker 48>Okay, And so would that it had to be the

2669
02:28:46.840 --> 02:28:50.159
<v Speaker 48>physical act of death in order to break the covenant

2670
02:28:50.239 --> 02:28:51.959
<v Speaker 48>and take the keys from that.

2671
02:28:52.600 --> 02:28:56.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's when Adam sinned, it affected him spiritually and physically,

2672
02:28:57.360 --> 02:29:01.159
<v Speaker 4>so the restoration required something spiritual and physical, hence the incarnation.

2673
02:29:02.559 --> 02:29:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that makes sense.

2674
02:29:04.520 --> 02:29:07.079
<v Speaker 48>Yeah, that's all I got for a day at I've

2675
02:29:07.120 --> 02:29:08.239
<v Speaker 48>been looking into Orthodoxy.

2676
02:29:08.360 --> 02:29:11.399
<v Speaker 4>Thanks to you so taking up absolutely, Thank you, Jennifer.

2677
02:29:11.440 --> 02:29:14.520
<v Speaker 4>Appreciate those questions. Those are good questions. Yeah. I remember

2678
02:29:15.159 --> 02:29:18.479
<v Speaker 4>working through primasm myself a long time ago. So I

2679
02:29:18.559 --> 02:29:21.360
<v Speaker 4>understand where you're at a baris.

2680
02:29:28.799 --> 02:29:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Uh hello, hey, hey, I So I had a question.

2681
02:29:35.200 --> 02:29:37.239
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to misrepresent you anything, but.

2682
02:29:39.079 --> 02:29:42.280
<v Speaker 50>Do you believe that like in the literal story about

2683
02:29:42.319 --> 02:29:46.040
<v Speaker 50>them an eve like in the garden, and then it's

2684
02:29:46.120 --> 02:29:46.559
<v Speaker 50>not like.

2685
02:29:49.159 --> 02:29:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Not hypercal but.

2686
02:29:51.840 --> 02:29:56.200
<v Speaker 4>Theoretical or metaphorical agorical. Yes, I believe it's literal.

2687
02:29:56.479 --> 02:30:01.239
<v Speaker 2>Yes, thank you you. Oh, I see. How do you

2688
02:30:01.319 --> 02:30:02.520
<v Speaker 2>rectify things like.

2689
02:30:04.280 --> 02:30:09.600
<v Speaker 50>Like Neanderthal evidence of us having not I'm not I don't.

2690
02:30:09.399 --> 02:30:09.799
<v Speaker 2>Really want to.

2691
02:30:09.840 --> 02:30:13.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't believe in evidence because multiple examples have been

2692
02:30:13.239 --> 02:30:14.840
<v Speaker 4>exposed to be notorious frauds.

2693
02:30:17.040 --> 02:30:17.799
<v Speaker 2>Can you name a few?

2694
02:30:18.399 --> 02:30:22.959
<v Speaker 4>Pelt down man, Nebraska man, right right?

2695
02:30:24.360 --> 02:30:26.959
<v Speaker 50>Do you are you familiar with the genetic evidence that

2696
02:30:27.040 --> 02:30:33.280
<v Speaker 50>we have for Denis Evans, Neanderthals, and modern day populations

2697
02:30:33.440 --> 02:30:38.239
<v Speaker 50>mostly focused in Southeast Asia, South America and Europe exclusively.

2698
02:30:38.559 --> 02:30:42.639
<v Speaker 4>How would genetic evidence prove uh, Neanderthals in Southeast Asia?

2699
02:30:44.440 --> 02:30:48.959
<v Speaker 50>Well, Neanderthal, it would Neanderthals in in Western Europe?

2700
02:30:49.479 --> 02:30:53.479
<v Speaker 4>But okay, would prove how a genetic How a genetic

2701
02:30:53.559 --> 02:30:56.399
<v Speaker 4>information which is like uh, you know, code and information

2702
02:30:56.559 --> 02:31:00.959
<v Speaker 4>for the human species or the animal species. How that proved? Cavemen?

2703
02:31:02.879 --> 02:31:05.879
<v Speaker 50>Well, I don't necessarily use the term cave man, but

2704
02:31:06.040 --> 02:31:09.440
<v Speaker 50>it does. It does paint a picture that there is

2705
02:31:10.159 --> 02:31:13.760
<v Speaker 50>separation in genetics. I mean, we obviously today everybody looks

2706
02:31:13.799 --> 02:31:14.120
<v Speaker 50>the same.

2707
02:31:15.879 --> 02:31:17.200
<v Speaker 9>We've we've a.

2708
02:31:17.239 --> 02:31:20.479
<v Speaker 4>Lot of differents, a lot of different models could explain

2709
02:31:20.520 --> 02:31:23.680
<v Speaker 4>why people look different. How does that prove? Gotic cavemen?

2710
02:31:24.559 --> 02:31:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Can you? Can you list a model that explains why

2711
02:31:26.879 --> 02:31:27.639
<v Speaker 2>people look different?

2712
02:31:27.840 --> 02:31:28.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah?

2713
02:31:28.120 --> 02:31:28.399
<v Speaker 4>Creation?

2714
02:31:30.600 --> 02:31:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay?

2715
02:31:31.040 --> 02:31:33.159
<v Speaker 50>Well, I mean to start off, I mean I am

2716
02:31:33.200 --> 02:31:35.639
<v Speaker 50>a Christian, but I don't believe that science and and

2717
02:31:35.760 --> 02:31:38.959
<v Speaker 50>the creation stories have to be mutually exclusive. I believe

2718
02:31:39.000 --> 02:31:43.280
<v Speaker 50>that God the evolution can be guided by divine hand.

2719
02:31:44.600 --> 02:31:49.159
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so you would be ultimately a heretic because of

2720
02:31:49.479 --> 02:31:53.000
<v Speaker 4>Roman's eight, which says that death in all forms enters

2721
02:31:53.040 --> 02:31:55.399
<v Speaker 4>in through the sin of Adam. So how is there

2722
02:31:55.479 --> 02:31:57.559
<v Speaker 4>millions of years of dead cavemen before Adam?

2723
02:31:58.719 --> 02:32:02.319
<v Speaker 51>Well, see, that's my biggest she was that if let's say, hypothetically,

2724
02:32:02.360 --> 02:32:05.840
<v Speaker 51>if Adam and Eve were the first Homo sapiens, then

2725
02:32:06.079 --> 02:32:09.200
<v Speaker 51>what would that say about man or tas before them

2726
02:32:09.479 --> 02:32:10.719
<v Speaker 51>or an ad mixture?

2727
02:32:10.799 --> 02:32:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Did they not have a soul?

2728
02:32:11.760 --> 02:32:13.319
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, let me, let's just put it this way.

2729
02:32:13.360 --> 02:32:15.479
<v Speaker 4>Does Jesus talk in the Gospels as if Adam and

2730
02:32:15.520 --> 02:32:16.600
<v Speaker 4>Eve were historical people?

2731
02:32:18.319 --> 02:32:19.760
<v Speaker 15>Yes, sir, there you go.

2732
02:32:20.479 --> 02:32:21.639
<v Speaker 4>So what does that tell you?

2733
02:32:23.440 --> 02:32:26.399
<v Speaker 50>Well, I mean, I I think that some things can

2734
02:32:26.479 --> 02:32:29.440
<v Speaker 50>be out of oracle and they don't necessarily like.

2735
02:32:29.520 --> 02:32:32.479
<v Speaker 4>All right, So yeah, so Jesus apparently wasn't aware of

2736
02:32:32.600 --> 02:32:37.440
<v Speaker 4>the allegories. And you know better than Jesus. But you

2737
02:32:37.639 --> 02:32:41.239
<v Speaker 4>just you just said that he was not allegorizing because

2738
02:32:41.239 --> 02:32:42.600
<v Speaker 4>he said that they were historical people.

2739
02:32:42.760 --> 02:32:46.879
<v Speaker 2>You just said that, yes, sir, But I think that

2740
02:32:49.959 --> 02:32:52.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't. I don't believe that it has to be.

2741
02:32:54.200 --> 02:32:55.680
<v Speaker 2>I think if I were to.

2742
02:32:55.719 --> 02:32:58.879
<v Speaker 4>Tell a just be honest, Jesus, just be honest, Jesus

2743
02:32:58.920 --> 02:32:59.959
<v Speaker 4>is wrong. Is that your position?

2744
02:33:02.079 --> 02:33:03.399
<v Speaker 2>No, sir, I don't believe he's wrong.

2745
02:33:04.079 --> 02:33:06.559
<v Speaker 4>Well, but you just said, you just said that they're

2746
02:33:06.600 --> 02:33:08.520
<v Speaker 4>not historical people, and Jesus said they were.

2747
02:33:09.639 --> 02:33:13.719
<v Speaker 50>Well, let's say, let's say hypothetically that Jesus was speaking

2748
02:33:13.879 --> 02:33:16.600
<v Speaker 50>allegorical but didn't include.

2749
02:33:16.159 --> 02:33:18.520
<v Speaker 2>That or didn't tell people that that. He didn't really

2750
02:33:18.559 --> 02:33:20.200
<v Speaker 2>have a way of going about explaining.

2751
02:33:20.879 --> 02:33:25.799
<v Speaker 4>Okay, and Denise Evans, do you think do you think

2752
02:33:25.959 --> 02:33:29.479
<v Speaker 4>Romans eight is hypothetical? And Paul says that death entered

2753
02:33:29.479 --> 02:33:34.360
<v Speaker 4>through Adam? All right, excuse me as aligorical.

2754
02:33:36.000 --> 02:33:39.000
<v Speaker 50>No, but I also think that they could that could

2755
02:33:39.040 --> 02:33:41.319
<v Speaker 50>be true even with an evolutionary model.

2756
02:33:43.760 --> 02:33:47.879
<v Speaker 4>If we So, if death enters through Adam, then how

2757
02:33:48.000 --> 02:33:51.079
<v Speaker 4>is it allegorically the case in the evolutionary theistic model.

2758
02:33:51.079 --> 02:33:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Ends on what you would consider Adam.

2759
02:33:53.120 --> 02:33:53.680
<v Speaker 52>I suppose.

2760
02:33:55.239 --> 02:33:58.520
<v Speaker 4>But what I'm asking is in that in in Romans,

2761
02:33:58.879 --> 02:34:01.479
<v Speaker 4>Paul is clearly talking about Adam, the first Adam, the

2762
02:34:01.520 --> 02:34:04.520
<v Speaker 4>guy in Genesis who introduced his death. And then he

2763
02:34:04.600 --> 02:34:07.440
<v Speaker 4>says that Christ is the second atom. So is Christ's

2764
02:34:07.440 --> 02:34:15.079
<v Speaker 4>position as the second atom also an allegory? So now

2765
02:34:15.120 --> 02:34:19.760
<v Speaker 4>you're well that yes, so Christology goes down down the tube. Shane,

2766
02:34:19.840 --> 02:34:28.559
<v Speaker 4>what's up? Conkf be sure to call in. Hey, what's up?

2767
02:34:28.639 --> 02:34:32.159
<v Speaker 2>Man's good to go? Cool.

2768
02:34:32.879 --> 02:34:36.040
<v Speaker 53>So I've got an argument that I just heard from

2769
02:34:36.079 --> 02:34:38.120
<v Speaker 53>Jimmy Aikin a couple of weeks ago.

2770
02:34:38.200 --> 02:34:39.760
<v Speaker 2>I didn't. I didn't know if you've heard it or not.

2771
02:34:39.879 --> 02:34:41.719
<v Speaker 4>The same Jimmy Aikin who says that Arius and the

2772
02:34:41.799 --> 02:34:42.879
<v Speaker 4>Storious we're not heretics.

2773
02:34:44.760 --> 02:34:48.319
<v Speaker 2>Maybe, but did you know he says that, No, I didn't.

2774
02:34:48.399 --> 02:34:50.600
<v Speaker 2>I'd have to check that out. What what did you say?

2775
02:34:50.639 --> 02:34:50.920
<v Speaker 2>He said?

2776
02:34:51.559 --> 02:34:53.879
<v Speaker 4>He says, Arius and Thestorius we're not heretics.

2777
02:34:54.559 --> 02:34:56.559
<v Speaker 2>Arius and the stories. I have to I have to

2778
02:34:56.639 --> 02:34:57.120
<v Speaker 2>look into that.

2779
02:34:57.840 --> 02:35:01.239
<v Speaker 53>But no, this is in regards to the premiacy of Peter.

2780
02:35:01.920 --> 02:35:04.520
<v Speaker 53>So from my understanding, you know, the Orthodox Church of

2781
02:35:04.600 --> 02:35:08.600
<v Speaker 53>firms that there was a you know, a premisey to

2782
02:35:08.799 --> 02:35:12.159
<v Speaker 53>the Patriot Office. And Jimmy Aikin kind of makes an

2783
02:35:12.200 --> 02:35:15.280
<v Speaker 53>argument when it comes to defending the papacy that basically goes,

2784
02:35:15.920 --> 02:35:18.680
<v Speaker 53>you know, who is more likely to misunderstand the function

2785
02:35:18.799 --> 02:35:21.520
<v Speaker 53>of something, the person who possesses it or the people

2786
02:35:21.559 --> 02:35:21.959
<v Speaker 53>who did not.

2787
02:35:23.639 --> 02:35:26.239
<v Speaker 4>And this is a dumb argument. Like so, in other words,

2788
02:35:26.760 --> 02:35:30.120
<v Speaker 4>we have to listen to you guys, even if you

2789
02:35:30.239 --> 02:35:33.159
<v Speaker 4>contradict or appear to contradict because you have the office.

2790
02:35:33.239 --> 02:35:36.000
<v Speaker 4>But that's the thing in question. So the question is

2791
02:35:36.079 --> 02:35:38.159
<v Speaker 4>not primacy of Peter, but what does it mean?

2792
02:35:38.840 --> 02:35:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Right exactly? And that's what I mean.

2793
02:35:40.719 --> 02:35:43.920
<v Speaker 53>His argument is basically, who's more likely to misunderstand what

2794
02:35:44.040 --> 02:35:47.319
<v Speaker 53>it means? You know, whoever possesses it or whoever doesn't.

2795
02:35:47.559 --> 02:35:50.280
<v Speaker 4>But the thing in question is what is the meaning

2796
02:35:50.360 --> 02:35:52.479
<v Speaker 4>of what you possess? Not do you possess it? So

2797
02:35:52.559 --> 02:35:56.399
<v Speaker 4>this is trading on an ambiguity of terminology, right well, I.

2798
02:35:56.440 --> 02:36:00.879
<v Speaker 53>Think even if you accept, you know, this like to

2799
02:36:01.079 --> 02:36:03.399
<v Speaker 53>take out the Vatican one understanding and I understand you

2800
02:36:03.479 --> 02:36:05.760
<v Speaker 53>can't do that to the full extent, but I just

2801
02:36:05.840 --> 02:36:07.399
<v Speaker 53>mean just for those so you can't do that at all?

2802
02:36:07.520 --> 02:36:09.000
<v Speaker 4>What do you mean? Right well?

2803
02:36:09.239 --> 02:36:12.559
<v Speaker 53>I'm saying, like, if we just assume this premiscy, like,

2804
02:36:12.760 --> 02:36:16.680
<v Speaker 53>let's say we accept the Orthodox view of you know

2805
02:36:16.799 --> 02:36:18.200
<v Speaker 53>what the premiacy of Peter is?

2806
02:36:18.959 --> 02:36:20.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think you could apply.

2807
02:36:20.479 --> 02:36:20.760
<v Speaker 9>It to that.

2808
02:36:23.479 --> 02:36:25.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I don't know what that's supposed to mean.

2809
02:36:25.520 --> 02:36:28.440
<v Speaker 4>But do you are you aware of the Chiad document,

2810
02:36:28.479 --> 02:36:32.840
<v Speaker 4>the Alexandria document. No, okay, how come? I'm not trying

2811
02:36:32.840 --> 02:36:34.360
<v Speaker 4>to be rude to you, like Roman Catholics have not

2812
02:36:34.399 --> 02:36:36.799
<v Speaker 4>read their own documents. I don't understanding because these documents

2813
02:36:36.840 --> 02:36:39.520
<v Speaker 4>say that the Orthodox are basically correct and that it

2814
02:36:39.639 --> 02:36:42.440
<v Speaker 4>evolved and that the Roman bishop didn't have your universal

2815
02:36:42.799 --> 02:36:46.000
<v Speaker 4>jurisdiction in the first millennium. That's a Chad paragraph nineteen.

2816
02:36:46.159 --> 02:36:48.399
<v Speaker 4>I got it on the screen right right, Because so

2817
02:36:48.479 --> 02:36:50.479
<v Speaker 4>how is Roman how's Vatican one trip? That's trip?

2818
02:36:51.799 --> 02:36:55.120
<v Speaker 53>Well, I mean that's where you know, doctrinal and development

2819
02:36:55.159 --> 02:36:55.719
<v Speaker 53>comes into play.

2820
02:36:55.719 --> 02:36:58.719
<v Speaker 4>And I know, well, but the Vatican One, the Vatican

2821
02:36:58.760 --> 02:37:00.280
<v Speaker 4>One says that it was always the case. So how

2822
02:37:00.360 --> 02:37:01.159
<v Speaker 4>is it now a development?

2823
02:37:02.799 --> 02:37:04.920
<v Speaker 53>Well, from my understanding, and you know, I don't have

2824
02:37:05.000 --> 02:37:06.520
<v Speaker 53>the text in front of me, and I'm definitely not

2825
02:37:06.600 --> 02:37:10.200
<v Speaker 53>an expert, but from my understanding, the Vatican One understanding

2826
02:37:10.399 --> 02:37:13.280
<v Speaker 53>is that there is you know, this development.

2827
02:37:13.440 --> 02:37:13.879
<v Speaker 2>No, it's not.

2828
02:37:14.079 --> 02:37:15.639
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't you know. It says that it was always

2829
02:37:15.719 --> 02:37:18.200
<v Speaker 4>understood from the earliest days that that Peter had this role.

2830
02:37:18.559 --> 02:37:26.280
<v Speaker 4>Does not say anything about development. Development is what Newman

2831
02:37:26.440 --> 02:37:28.959
<v Speaker 4>said To try to defend it to the people who said,

2832
02:37:29.239 --> 02:37:31.760
<v Speaker 4>what about all the counter examples in the first thousand years?

2833
02:37:32.079 --> 02:37:34.000
<v Speaker 4>Newman says that, yeah, it's the thing that it's a

2834
02:37:34.040 --> 02:37:37.079
<v Speaker 4>seed that develops into a tree. Yeah, okay, so it

2835
02:37:37.159 --> 02:37:39.319
<v Speaker 4>can't be it can't be something that was always there,

2836
02:37:39.399 --> 02:37:41.840
<v Speaker 4>clear and present, as Vatican won in the other thirteen say,

2837
02:37:42.079 --> 02:37:43.799
<v Speaker 4>and something that was not clear and developed. Those are

2838
02:37:43.879 --> 02:37:45.040
<v Speaker 4>mutually exclusive claims.

2839
02:37:45.760 --> 02:37:45.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

2840
02:37:48.319 --> 02:37:50.639
<v Speaker 4>And by the way, the I mean again eighty and

2841
02:37:51.040 --> 02:37:53.399
<v Speaker 4>Alexandria document from the Vatican admitted developed.

2842
02:37:54.319 --> 02:37:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Right. But I'm sure there's a I'm sure there's a

2843
02:37:56.479 --> 02:37:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Catholic understanding.

2844
02:37:57.559 --> 02:37:57.680
<v Speaker 45>You know.

2845
02:37:57.920 --> 02:37:59.719
<v Speaker 4>The Catholic understanding is that I don't care what she

2846
02:37:59.840 --> 02:38:02.479
<v Speaker 4>Ate and Alexander say because they're not infallible and not

2847
02:38:02.559 --> 02:38:05.440
<v Speaker 4>binding because anytimes it's been a problem, it's not binding.

2848
02:38:06.319 --> 02:38:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Right. But getting back to the question, or do you

2849
02:38:10.079 --> 02:38:12.319
<v Speaker 2>think you know it's just not a legitimate.

2850
02:38:12.600 --> 02:38:16.159
<v Speaker 4>It's a it's trading on ambiguity. So the it's like

2851
02:38:16.559 --> 02:38:20.799
<v Speaker 4>using ambiguity in terms to get you to admit that, well,

2852
02:38:20.840 --> 02:38:23.879
<v Speaker 4>if there was a premiacy, therefore only Rome would have

2853
02:38:23.920 --> 02:38:28.159
<v Speaker 4>perfectly understood it. So it's a classic car salesman bait

2854
02:38:28.200 --> 02:38:32.799
<v Speaker 4>and switch pitch from the Roman Catholics. Uh, cost you,

2855
02:38:33.520 --> 02:38:37.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm not doing FAQs, but good question, appreciate it. So

2856
02:38:37.639 --> 02:38:40.600
<v Speaker 4>the Roman Catholics have been very civil tonight. I enjoy

2857
02:38:40.840 --> 02:38:43.959
<v Speaker 4>that's been enjoyable. They've been the most enjoyable tonight. The

2858
02:38:44.079 --> 02:38:47.719
<v Speaker 4>Muslims and the Mormons and the everybody's been crazy. Cost you.

2859
02:38:49.639 --> 02:38:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Hello, OJ, how do you do?

2860
02:38:51.639 --> 02:38:52.040
<v Speaker 4>What's up?

2861
02:38:52.120 --> 02:38:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Man? What's up? I got a question about TAG.

2862
02:38:57.879 --> 02:39:00.920
<v Speaker 31>Let's say that I just give up any idea about

2863
02:39:02.399 --> 02:39:04.719
<v Speaker 31>you know, order in the universe.

2864
02:39:08.879 --> 02:39:11.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't need TAG to justify it. Therefore, and I

2865
02:39:11.719 --> 02:39:18.399
<v Speaker 2>just based my worldview on observation and statistics. You know,

2866
02:39:18.680 --> 02:39:21.399
<v Speaker 2>the statistics prevent against TAG.

2867
02:39:21.719 --> 02:39:25.479
<v Speaker 4>Statistics would presuppose order, so that wouldn't make any sense.

2868
02:39:27.040 --> 02:39:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Hm hmm. I see what you're saying. I figured you

2869
02:39:33.959 --> 02:39:34.559
<v Speaker 2>were going to say that.

2870
02:39:34.639 --> 02:39:38.520
<v Speaker 39>But I feel like statistics, okay, they use numbers, but

2871
02:39:38.719 --> 02:39:39.520
<v Speaker 39>they're also.

2872
02:39:41.280 --> 02:39:43.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what's the argument.

2873
02:39:43.200 --> 02:39:47.159
<v Speaker 4>I guess like, yeah, statistics requires numbers.

2874
02:39:47.440 --> 02:39:48.879
<v Speaker 2>You can have numbers without order.

2875
02:39:49.680 --> 02:39:55.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean order in the universe is necessary to

2876
02:39:55.120 --> 02:39:58.920
<v Speaker 4>have these invariant, immaterial concepts or principles like the number seven,

2877
02:39:59.000 --> 02:39:59.600
<v Speaker 4>the number ten.

2878
02:39:59.760 --> 02:39:59.879
<v Speaker 7>Ye.

2879
02:40:00.559 --> 02:40:04.159
<v Speaker 2>I don't think. I don't saying it's without immaterial. I

2880
02:40:04.239 --> 02:40:08.840
<v Speaker 2>mean conceptual concepts might in the human mind.

2881
02:40:09.840 --> 02:40:13.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, something conceptual by definition is abstract, is not material,

2882
02:40:14.040 --> 02:40:15.879
<v Speaker 4>So if you want to say that concepts are matter,

2883
02:40:16.000 --> 02:40:17.000
<v Speaker 4>that's even worse position.

2884
02:40:18.360 --> 02:40:21.719
<v Speaker 41>No, No, I'm saying there may be immaterial things in

2885
02:40:22.520 --> 02:40:24.280
<v Speaker 41>an unordered, grandom universe.

2886
02:40:25.479 --> 02:40:28.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, then you wouldn't be able to make sentences, because

2887
02:40:28.239 --> 02:40:30.959
<v Speaker 4>sentences require a universe where you can predicate and give

2888
02:40:31.040 --> 02:40:33.879
<v Speaker 4>meaning to objects. That there's a law of identity. How

2889
02:40:34.000 --> 02:40:36.559
<v Speaker 4>is the law of identity possible if there's no order

2890
02:40:36.600 --> 02:40:37.159
<v Speaker 4>in the universe.

2891
02:40:40.200 --> 02:40:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Hmmm, yeah, good points.

2892
02:40:43.120 --> 02:40:50.959
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, linguistic Linguistic philosophy, I'm saying presupposes the ability to predicate,

2893
02:40:51.040 --> 02:40:53.040
<v Speaker 4>on the basis of the law of identity, that you

2894
02:40:53.079 --> 02:40:56.239
<v Speaker 4>can pick out one object as distinct from other objects.

2895
02:40:59.559 --> 02:41:01.280
<v Speaker 4>John Helvin's words, Here we go.

2896
02:41:05.559 --> 02:41:06.120
<v Speaker 8>Can you hear me?

2897
02:41:06.239 --> 02:41:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Jay? Yep, my man, my man. Okay.

2898
02:41:10.239 --> 02:41:15.239
<v Speaker 54>One of my friends recently has been turning towards Eastern Orthodoxy.

2899
02:41:15.280 --> 02:41:17.600
<v Speaker 2>God bless his soul. Shout out to Chris, God bless him.

2900
02:41:18.360 --> 02:41:23.920
<v Speaker 54>But he shot me a picture of the Catechumen it

2901
02:41:24.600 --> 02:41:27.879
<v Speaker 54>and sort of if there are any heresies that one holds,

2902
02:41:28.159 --> 02:41:31.319
<v Speaker 54>they need to be renounced, denounce whatever you may say

2903
02:41:31.319 --> 02:41:34.280
<v Speaker 54>about it. And I saw total depravity is up there,

2904
02:41:34.920 --> 02:41:39.200
<v Speaker 54>and I find myself to be in the reformed tradition,

2905
02:41:39.760 --> 02:41:42.239
<v Speaker 54>and I've been looking at total depravity a lot, so

2906
02:41:42.280 --> 02:41:44.799
<v Speaker 54>I wanted to hear from your perspective why it is

2907
02:41:44.920 --> 02:41:48.879
<v Speaker 54>that total depravity is a heresy and then sort of

2908
02:41:48.959 --> 02:41:51.520
<v Speaker 54>give you a little pushback if I can not too

2909
02:41:51.559 --> 02:41:53.520
<v Speaker 54>affirm necessary in my case, but I do want.

2910
02:41:53.440 --> 02:41:54.319
<v Speaker 2>To hear what you have to say.

2911
02:41:55.440 --> 02:41:59.959
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's heresy from the outset, because typically Calvinists or whoever,

2912
02:42:00.040 --> 02:42:01.559
<v Speaker 4>or when they try to explain this, they end up

2913
02:42:01.600 --> 02:42:05.000
<v Speaker 4>saying that nature is someone inherently evil. God's the creator

2914
02:42:05.079 --> 02:42:07.760
<v Speaker 4>of everything that exists, and he can't create evil. In fact,

2915
02:42:07.799 --> 02:42:10.600
<v Speaker 4>Scripture says he's not the author of evil. So are

2916
02:42:10.639 --> 02:42:13.600
<v Speaker 4>you a Manichean do you think that God creates evil things?

2917
02:42:14.159 --> 02:42:16.040
<v Speaker 4>Or are you a Christian? And that everything that he

2918
02:42:16.200 --> 02:42:17.799
<v Speaker 4>created in Genesis one is good?

2919
02:42:19.559 --> 02:42:23.399
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely believe that everything that he created is good. I

2920
02:42:23.479 --> 02:42:25.360
<v Speaker 2>believe absolutely everything he created is good.

2921
02:42:25.479 --> 02:42:28.000
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so then your nature, your nature can't be evil.

2922
02:42:28.760 --> 02:42:31.799
<v Speaker 54>Yeah, I believe that your nature cannot be evil. However,

2923
02:42:32.520 --> 02:42:35.000
<v Speaker 54>the both of us would I think to come to

2924
02:42:35.159 --> 02:42:37.239
<v Speaker 54>some sort of agreement, Probably not in terms.

2925
02:42:37.079 --> 02:42:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Of linguistics, but in terms of when Adam and Eve

2926
02:42:41.120 --> 02:42:41.920
<v Speaker 2>ate the fruit.

2927
02:42:42.440 --> 02:42:44.760
<v Speaker 54>God said that the day you eat it, you shall

2928
02:42:44.840 --> 02:42:45.520
<v Speaker 54>surely die.

2929
02:42:45.719 --> 02:42:48.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, spiritual death. That doesn't mean that doesn't mean that

2930
02:42:48.319 --> 02:42:49.520
<v Speaker 4>their human nature.

2931
02:42:50.159 --> 02:42:52.440
<v Speaker 54>I'm not going with I'm not trying to necessarily say

2932
02:42:52.559 --> 02:42:55.639
<v Speaker 54>hold a totally property view, but I'm just simply trying

2933
02:42:55.680 --> 02:43:00.520
<v Speaker 54>to investigate, how does etern orthodoxy under stay in that

2934
02:43:00.799 --> 02:43:03.399
<v Speaker 54>death and what does it do? What are the what

2935
02:43:03.479 --> 02:43:04.479
<v Speaker 54>are the ramifications?

2936
02:43:04.879 --> 02:43:10.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so, so it means the loss of divine life,

2937
02:43:10.799 --> 02:43:13.079
<v Speaker 4>the life of the Holy Spirit. So the uncreated grace

2938
02:43:13.159 --> 02:43:17.360
<v Speaker 4>of God is lost in Adam's fall, and Adam is

2939
02:43:17.440 --> 02:43:20.440
<v Speaker 4>reduced to a mortal state. So he's mortal, but his

2940
02:43:20.600 --> 02:43:23.120
<v Speaker 4>nature is still good, So he still has human will,

2941
02:43:23.319 --> 02:43:25.639
<v Speaker 4>he still has human nature, human energy, all of those

2942
02:43:25.840 --> 02:43:28.600
<v Speaker 4>things that we call faculties of human nature. And so

2943
02:43:28.680 --> 02:43:31.520
<v Speaker 4>when Christ assumes human nature, that's what he assumes in

2944
02:43:31.680 --> 02:43:34.600
<v Speaker 4>order to heal it, to resurrect it, to deify it.

2945
02:43:35.040 --> 02:43:38.040
<v Speaker 4>So it's never the case that the nature itself becomes evil,

2946
02:43:38.159 --> 02:43:40.440
<v Speaker 4>or that he's always sinning, or that there's such a

2947
02:43:40.520 --> 02:43:42.879
<v Speaker 4>thing as a state of sin. All of those are

2948
02:43:43.000 --> 02:43:46.760
<v Speaker 4>Calvinist Lutheran type positions which are patently false.

2949
02:43:48.479 --> 02:43:50.719
<v Speaker 2>All right, now, let me ask a weird question. But

2950
02:43:51.760 --> 02:43:57.079
<v Speaker 2>so if it's perhaps for any reason, I.

2951
02:43:57.079 --> 02:43:58.520
<v Speaker 54>Don't I don't know how to I don't know how

2952
02:43:58.559 --> 02:44:00.799
<v Speaker 54>to phrase this because I've been I've been hetruggling recently

2953
02:44:00.959 --> 02:44:03.959
<v Speaker 54>with the fact that Calvin didn't hold to the l

2954
02:44:04.360 --> 02:44:08.639
<v Speaker 54>Most Calvinists in general do not hold. They don't sound

2955
02:44:08.719 --> 02:44:12.239
<v Speaker 54>like Calvin when he speaks about the atonement. Calvin's language

2956
02:44:12.360 --> 02:44:18.079
<v Speaker 54>is very universal because one cannot hold to a true perseverance,

2957
02:44:18.159 --> 02:44:20.200
<v Speaker 54>or one cannot hold that your salvation would.

2958
02:44:19.959 --> 02:44:21.639
<v Speaker 2>Truly be secure if you do not believe that.

2959
02:44:21.680 --> 02:44:24.840
<v Speaker 54>Jesus Christ died for the sins of the entire world.

2960
02:44:24.920 --> 02:44:28.920
<v Speaker 54>So Calvin holds that without any debate, and in fact

2961
02:44:29.000 --> 02:44:32.920
<v Speaker 54>he says with with with a lot of fervor, when

2962
02:44:32.959 --> 02:44:35.879
<v Speaker 54>you look at the predestination, what is it? The eternal

2963
02:44:35.920 --> 02:44:38.120
<v Speaker 54>predestination of God? I think that's the name of the book.

2964
02:44:39.840 --> 02:44:42.680
<v Speaker 55>He says there when he's when he's debating with Georgia's

2965
02:44:43.559 --> 02:44:45.520
<v Speaker 55>that he says that there are some there are some

2966
02:44:45.680 --> 02:44:50.239
<v Speaker 55>people who say that, yes, Jesus died for the sins.

2967
02:44:51.479 --> 02:44:52.239
<v Speaker 2>Let me rephrase that.

2968
02:44:53.159 --> 02:44:55.120
<v Speaker 4>Look, I'm not trying. I'm not trying to. I'm not

2969
02:44:55.200 --> 02:44:56.760
<v Speaker 4>We don't have the time right now to go through

2970
02:44:56.840 --> 02:45:01.000
<v Speaker 4>all the Tulip. I've got multiple talks where I walk

2971
02:45:01.120 --> 02:45:02.639
<v Speaker 4>through all of Calvinism.

2972
02:45:03.200 --> 02:45:03.319
<v Speaker 56>Uh.

2973
02:45:03.440 --> 02:45:04.879
<v Speaker 4>You can go to the talk that I did with

2974
02:45:05.120 --> 02:45:07.719
<v Speaker 4>Cootel Church of the Eternal Logos and I go through

2975
02:45:07.760 --> 02:45:09.879
<v Speaker 4>all of Tulip. You can go to my clips channel

2976
02:45:10.159 --> 02:45:12.200
<v Speaker 4>and I have two talks going all the way through Tulip.

2977
02:45:12.520 --> 02:45:13.879
<v Speaker 4>I don't have the time right now to go through

2978
02:45:13.879 --> 02:45:17.639
<v Speaker 4>all of Tulip, but those talks will answer in detail, Uh,

2979
02:45:17.760 --> 02:45:22.000
<v Speaker 4>the issues that you have today. I appreciate the question.

2980
02:45:22.200 --> 02:45:24.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm not trying to be rude to you, but just

2981
02:45:24.440 --> 02:45:26.920
<v Speaker 4>can't do the whole calvin debate right now. Knocta, what's up?

2982
02:45:30.600 --> 02:45:43.200
<v Speaker 4>Knockta gonna, I'm mute, I'm mute.

2983
02:45:44.840 --> 02:45:47.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm here. My apologies for that. Always looking for the microphone,

2984
02:45:47.600 --> 02:45:48.079
<v Speaker 2>the browser.

2985
02:45:48.399 --> 02:45:48.879
<v Speaker 4>It's all good.

2986
02:45:48.920 --> 02:45:53.200
<v Speaker 2>What's up, man, It's a nice being here.

2987
02:45:53.239 --> 02:45:54.879
<v Speaker 38>I've been listening to you for a couple of months,

2988
02:45:54.959 --> 02:45:58.440
<v Speaker 38>to Sam watching a light you two. I'm born and

2989
02:45:58.600 --> 02:46:02.879
<v Speaker 38>raised Protestant. I'm leaving Porto Rico. So the knowledge or

2990
02:46:03.200 --> 02:46:06.840
<v Speaker 38>how the Gospel and the work got here to my

2991
02:46:07.000 --> 02:46:11.600
<v Speaker 38>knowledge was around the nineties sixteen or nineteen hundred and sixteen,

2992
02:46:12.159 --> 02:46:15.520
<v Speaker 38>when that I was a wave of.

2993
02:46:17.120 --> 02:46:21.079
<v Speaker 2>The Word of God. And I'm sorry for my English,

2994
02:46:21.120 --> 02:46:23.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm not too well spoken on that.

2995
02:46:24.399 --> 02:46:28.200
<v Speaker 38>But basically i've been or I was because I was

2996
02:46:28.280 --> 02:46:30.399
<v Speaker 38>out of the church for like eight nine years.

2997
02:46:30.440 --> 02:46:33.120
<v Speaker 2>I came back looking for knowledge.

2998
02:46:33.239 --> 02:46:37.079
<v Speaker 38>The true root of what is following Christ, and I've

2999
02:46:37.120 --> 02:46:43.200
<v Speaker 38>been closer to orthodoxy. Actually, I'm gonna ask a simple question. Basically,

3000
02:46:43.760 --> 02:46:46.920
<v Speaker 38>with everything that I went through, I sing things in

3001
02:46:48.360 --> 02:46:53.799
<v Speaker 38>Protestant churches, God working through it, I live freeing people

3002
02:46:53.879 --> 02:46:57.879
<v Speaker 38>of diseases, demons, and all that I've been seen in.

3003
02:46:57.959 --> 02:47:02.079
<v Speaker 2>Life of people improved through this is i'd say, way

3004
02:47:02.159 --> 02:47:05.559
<v Speaker 2>of saying that Jesus Christ die for us. And basically

3005
02:47:05.639 --> 02:47:07.079
<v Speaker 2>the whole idea is the same.

3006
02:47:07.879 --> 02:47:11.360
<v Speaker 38>We split up on incorrect me if I'm wrong, traditions

3007
02:47:11.440 --> 02:47:15.399
<v Speaker 38>and how from the bottom up it goes, but the

3008
02:47:15.520 --> 02:47:17.719
<v Speaker 38>idea is the same. So if I'm seeing all of

3009
02:47:17.799 --> 02:47:21.239
<v Speaker 38>that God working through people through my mom, if I'm

3010
02:47:21.239 --> 02:47:25.639
<v Speaker 38>gonna and everything of that, how can I put those

3011
02:47:25.879 --> 02:47:26.840
<v Speaker 38>two things together?

3012
02:47:26.959 --> 02:47:29.399
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I appreciate the question. I mean there's no

3013
02:47:30.159 --> 02:47:33.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean, everybody could say that God is working through

3014
02:47:33.879 --> 02:47:37.319
<v Speaker 4>people and God is doing things for people. But obviously,

3015
02:47:37.520 --> 02:47:40.120
<v Speaker 4>since everyone can say that that can't be the thing

3016
02:47:40.719 --> 02:47:43.479
<v Speaker 4>that shows us which is the true church, because everybody

3017
02:47:43.520 --> 02:47:45.840
<v Speaker 4>will claim that or everybody will say that. So the

3018
02:47:45.920 --> 02:47:49.760
<v Speaker 4>only way to solve this is to actually go into

3019
02:47:49.799 --> 02:47:59.360
<v Speaker 4>the theological differences and historical differences. Journalist, you got an

3020
02:47:59.360 --> 02:48:06.920
<v Speaker 4>immute journalist, Connor, do you want to talk?

3021
02:48:10.040 --> 02:48:10.319
<v Speaker 2>You have to?

3022
02:48:10.399 --> 02:48:10.799
<v Speaker 8>I mute.

3023
02:48:12.120 --> 02:48:20.479
<v Speaker 4>I dropped off cunt opinions. I feel like I'm setting

3024
02:48:20.559 --> 02:48:24.920
<v Speaker 4>myself up by going to cunt opinions for a troll,

3025
02:48:25.159 --> 02:48:31.879
<v Speaker 4>So I'm guilty if I get trolled. Go ahead, I mute.

3026
02:48:37.120 --> 02:48:39.000
<v Speaker 4>You have to ummute. Why are you raising your hand.

3027
02:48:43.639 --> 02:48:44.399
<v Speaker 2>Speaking to Meg?

3028
02:48:45.319 --> 02:48:49.719
<v Speaker 12>Yep, sort of literally just joined us to be like

3029
02:48:50.479 --> 02:48:51.520
<v Speaker 12>seven seconds ago.

3030
02:48:52.200 --> 02:48:53.079
<v Speaker 4>Okay, what's on your mind?

3031
02:48:54.959 --> 02:49:00.200
<v Speaker 12>I shoined it because it's is to be Aslam, Atheism, controlimus,

3032
02:49:00.280 --> 02:49:01.920
<v Speaker 12>take one, et cetera, et cetera.

3033
02:49:02.159 --> 02:49:03.040
<v Speaker 4>Sure, what's on your man?

3034
02:49:06.920 --> 02:49:07.719
<v Speaker 2>That's all I mean is.

3035
02:49:08.840 --> 02:49:14.639
<v Speaker 12>I canolstate Christianity Prosonism. It's on the same religion. It

3036
02:49:14.719 --> 02:49:17.959
<v Speaker 12>says a lot of hatred between each of those religions.

3037
02:49:19.840 --> 02:49:23.760
<v Speaker 2>And I'm just wondering if they anybody.

3038
02:49:24.079 --> 02:49:29.000
<v Speaker 12>Sees the differences within these religions and how silly they are.

3039
02:49:30.399 --> 02:49:33.079
<v Speaker 12>It's Hadden of hatred that has caused between each of

3040
02:49:33.120 --> 02:49:33.799
<v Speaker 12>their religions.

3041
02:49:35.319 --> 02:49:38.159
<v Speaker 4>So they're wrong because members of the religions hate each other.

3042
02:49:39.440 --> 02:49:42.040
<v Speaker 2>No, not wrong, not wrong, not at all.

3043
02:49:42.280 --> 02:49:43.040
<v Speaker 4>You said they're silly.

3044
02:49:44.719 --> 02:49:47.200
<v Speaker 2>No, So I live anyway, it's coast to Scotland.

3045
02:49:51.120 --> 02:50:29.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm not there. What you're saying? Yah rah ex ephens, exophens.

3046
02:50:31.719 --> 02:50:41.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm mute, m hm axophans. You have to unmute if

3047
02:50:41.319 --> 02:51:06.680
<v Speaker 4>you wanna talk. M David with a T. David, Hey,

3048
02:51:06.799 --> 02:51:07.200
<v Speaker 4>can you hear me?

3049
02:51:07.319 --> 02:51:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Jack? Uh huh, Hey, how's it going?

3050
02:51:09.840 --> 02:51:14.600
<v Speaker 52>So my question is, so I am Oriental Orthodox and

3051
02:51:14.799 --> 02:51:17.040
<v Speaker 52>I just want to get your opinion on the Oriental

3052
02:51:17.159 --> 02:51:19.920
<v Speaker 52>Church on the north of orthodox side, and why do

3053
02:51:19.920 --> 02:51:24.799
<v Speaker 52>you think the Calcidonian approach is true Orthodoxy given the

3054
02:51:24.920 --> 02:51:28.280
<v Speaker 52>historical context of the church, So when the council was happening,

3055
02:51:28.319 --> 02:51:30.200
<v Speaker 52>for example, historical fact.

3056
02:51:30.719 --> 02:51:33.200
<v Speaker 4>I've done many streams with David Arhun on this. You

3057
02:51:33.360 --> 02:51:35.079
<v Speaker 4>go watch those streams. Do you want to get a

3058
02:51:35.159 --> 02:51:36.879
<v Speaker 4>precise thing? We're not gonna go to all the history.

3059
02:51:36.879 --> 02:51:38.319
<v Speaker 4>That's impossible. So what's given?

3060
02:51:38.479 --> 02:51:39.280
<v Speaker 31>Not the history?

3061
02:51:39.319 --> 02:51:41.360
<v Speaker 4>I just do you just said historical context?

3062
02:51:41.440 --> 02:51:44.280
<v Speaker 52>What do you mean I'm saying the Orientals were not

3063
02:51:44.360 --> 02:51:46.600
<v Speaker 52>even invited to the Caltidonian Council.

3064
02:51:46.760 --> 02:51:50.879
<v Speaker 4>So the Fifth Council is the council that's that's crucial here,

3065
02:51:52.840 --> 02:51:55.920
<v Speaker 4>cract for fifty one. No, the Fifth Council, that's the

3066
02:51:56.000 --> 02:52:01.159
<v Speaker 4>key council, that's the one where the tempted reconciliation with

3067
02:52:01.239 --> 02:52:01.760
<v Speaker 4>you guys is.

3068
02:52:03.959 --> 02:52:07.319
<v Speaker 52>Okay, So you're saying the Orientals did not accept and

3069
02:52:07.799 --> 02:52:10.120
<v Speaker 52>they're not true Orthodox for that reason, some did?

3070
02:52:12.200 --> 02:52:15.959
<v Speaker 4>Which ones all the ones that agreed to the Justinian

3071
02:52:16.360 --> 02:52:20.079
<v Speaker 4>reconciliation and the Fifth Ecumenical Council. Because even today many

3072
02:52:20.120 --> 02:52:23.479
<v Speaker 4>of your guys admit that the Fifth Council teaches the

3073
02:52:23.600 --> 02:52:28.479
<v Speaker 4>correct view of the hypostasis and the subject of Christ.

3074
02:52:28.680 --> 02:52:32.159
<v Speaker 4>But the point of departure tends to be what are

3075
02:52:32.200 --> 02:52:34.719
<v Speaker 4>we going to do with the question of people like severuss.

3076
02:52:34.799 --> 02:52:38.719
<v Speaker 4>So most of you guys, as far as I'm aware,

3077
02:52:38.920 --> 02:52:41.079
<v Speaker 4>tend to say that we agree in the way that

3078
02:52:41.200 --> 02:52:44.639
<v Speaker 4>the Fifth Council presents kurelling Christology.

3079
02:52:46.639 --> 02:52:50.479
<v Speaker 2>And do you think the physicists churches are not true Orthodox?

3080
02:52:51.920 --> 02:52:54.319
<v Speaker 4>Well, like I'm saying, like we are not in communion,

3081
02:52:54.520 --> 02:52:57.520
<v Speaker 4>But you guys agree that the Fifth Council presents it correctly.

3082
02:52:57.639 --> 02:53:01.719
<v Speaker 4>So the issue becomes the people like severus. But no,

3083
02:53:01.840 --> 02:53:03.840
<v Speaker 4>we are not in communion, so we don't consider.

3084
02:53:03.600 --> 02:53:05.879
<v Speaker 2>Your orthodox Okay, appreciate it.

3085
02:53:06.120 --> 02:53:08.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, good questions. I mean I've got longer We've got

3086
02:53:08.479 --> 02:53:10.239
<v Speaker 4>longer streams with David Orhan and all that. If you

3087
02:53:10.280 --> 02:53:14.239
<v Speaker 4>want to go check those out, Uh exists exta Fins.

3088
02:53:14.280 --> 02:53:19.799
<v Speaker 4>You want to try again, it's open for him. If

3089
02:53:19.799 --> 02:53:21.719
<v Speaker 4>you want to call in uh, you can do so

3090
02:53:21.920 --> 02:53:27.799
<v Speaker 4>through the call in uh Twitter space right here. I'm

3091
02:53:27.799 --> 02:53:29.920
<v Speaker 4>gonna have to go T T and little girls room

3092
02:53:29.959 --> 02:53:33.200
<v Speaker 4>here in a minute. But I'm still I'm still here.

3093
02:53:33.559 --> 02:53:39.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm still staying. No, no exa Fins. We have to

3094
02:53:40.040 --> 02:53:40.280
<v Speaker 4>um you.

3095
02:53:42.399 --> 02:53:45.159
<v Speaker 2>Hello, Hello, can you hear me?

3096
02:53:48.600 --> 02:53:48.639
<v Speaker 11>So?

3097
02:53:48.840 --> 02:53:50.040
<v Speaker 4>I have a quick question.

3098
02:53:51.799 --> 02:53:55.280
<v Speaker 47>What's the proper response to the platonic youth for the lemma?

3099
02:53:55.879 --> 02:53:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Is it like a first lemma?

3100
02:53:57.200 --> 02:53:57.520
<v Speaker 57>Or is it?

3101
02:53:59.600 --> 02:54:01.559
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a false dilemment. We've covered that a lot

3102
02:54:01.639 --> 02:54:04.760
<v Speaker 4>in the old old live streams. I'm sorry, I just

3103
02:54:04.840 --> 02:54:06.680
<v Speaker 4>have the energy to go through all that. Do you

3104
02:54:06.760 --> 02:54:08.600
<v Speaker 4>want to try again and not sing at me? Do

3105
02:54:08.600 --> 02:54:10.079
<v Speaker 4>you want to make an argument? Or you gonna sing

3106
02:54:10.120 --> 02:54:10.719
<v Speaker 4>Arabic at me?

3107
02:54:19.719 --> 02:54:19.959
<v Speaker 58>Hello?

3108
02:54:20.239 --> 02:54:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Everybody? I tried to speak Arabic earlier. I'm just trying

3109
02:54:24.840 --> 02:54:28.479
<v Speaker 2>to bring up Palestine into the debat, but.

3110
02:54:29.120 --> 02:54:30.520
<v Speaker 4>Has nothing to do with the topics.

3111
02:54:31.520 --> 02:54:34.399
<v Speaker 2>I guess Arabic was it wasn't invented back.

3112
02:54:37.159 --> 02:54:37.360
<v Speaker 8>Eric.

3113
02:54:43.680 --> 02:54:55.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you're cutting out man, people in the chat bitching.

3114
02:54:55.840 --> 02:54:57.719
<v Speaker 4>I make I make jokes. Dude, if you can't handle it,

3115
02:54:57.760 --> 02:54:59.600
<v Speaker 4>don't come on? Where do you make fun of his voice?

3116
02:55:00.239 --> 02:55:00.920
<v Speaker 44>You mean?

3117
02:55:04.280 --> 02:55:07.079
<v Speaker 4>Go ahead, just a question if you're there.

3118
02:55:08.399 --> 02:55:11.200
<v Speaker 2>The attribute of God? Is it God in itself?

3119
02:55:12.760 --> 02:55:15.959
<v Speaker 4>The Orthodox view their energies, So they're not his essence,

3120
02:55:16.000 --> 02:55:19.680
<v Speaker 4>they're his actions, but.

3121
02:55:19.799 --> 02:55:20.879
<v Speaker 34>It is it is God?

3122
02:55:21.200 --> 02:55:24.399
<v Speaker 4>Or is it God is fully present in his actions? Yes,

3123
02:55:24.600 --> 02:55:26.319
<v Speaker 4>so they're not different than God.

3124
02:55:26.360 --> 02:55:29.799
<v Speaker 2>But that is That is the Orthodox perspective.

3125
02:55:30.079 --> 02:55:33.040
<v Speaker 34>What about Islamic perspective on that?

3126
02:55:33.840 --> 02:55:36.360
<v Speaker 4>They've got all kinds of schools about the relationship of

3127
02:55:36.440 --> 02:55:42.280
<v Speaker 4>all that to his attributes sit they have all kinds

3128
02:55:42.280 --> 02:55:48.760
<v Speaker 4>of schools and positions. So it depends on whether you're

3129
02:55:48.799 --> 02:55:53.879
<v Speaker 4>talking to AUTHORI a Shari Muturidi. They're all over the place. Sorry,

3130
02:55:53.920 --> 02:55:56.079
<v Speaker 4>you're you're cutting out, man, I can't you there's no uh,

3131
02:55:56.840 --> 02:56:00.479
<v Speaker 4>not a good signal here? Say that?

3132
02:56:00.559 --> 02:56:00.920
<v Speaker 2>What's up?

3133
02:56:10.520 --> 02:56:12.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm mute? You don't have to while you're raising your hand.

3134
02:56:14.559 --> 02:56:17.799
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, okay, what I'm a own language figure.

3135
02:56:18.159 --> 02:56:21.799
<v Speaker 4>So are you calling from a toilet? What's up?

3136
02:56:21.879 --> 02:56:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Man?

3137
02:56:22.959 --> 02:56:23.000
<v Speaker 7>No?

3138
02:56:23.879 --> 02:56:28.239
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, this is my figure. Can you give me better?

3139
02:56:28.920 --> 02:56:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Or should I shut down?

3140
02:56:31.000 --> 02:56:33.079
<v Speaker 4>Are you calling me from six feet under the grave?

3141
02:56:33.239 --> 02:56:33.600
<v Speaker 4>What's up?

3142
02:56:33.680 --> 02:56:33.799
<v Speaker 2>Man?

3143
02:56:33.840 --> 02:56:34.319
<v Speaker 4>I can't hear you?

3144
02:56:35.159 --> 02:56:36.559
<v Speaker 2>Great? Great, the grave?

3145
02:56:37.680 --> 02:56:39.200
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, they took this down from here.

3146
02:56:39.520 --> 02:56:40.239
<v Speaker 4>What's on your mind?

3147
02:56:41.399 --> 02:56:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

3148
02:56:45.040 --> 02:56:45.879
<v Speaker 16>Can you get him better?

3149
02:56:46.040 --> 02:56:46.159
<v Speaker 2>Now?

3150
02:56:46.479 --> 02:56:47.559
<v Speaker 4>Yes, sir? What's on your mind?

3151
02:56:48.719 --> 02:56:49.159
<v Speaker 7>All right?

3152
02:56:49.239 --> 02:56:49.559
<v Speaker 2>All right?

3153
02:56:49.920 --> 02:56:52.840
<v Speaker 7>What's on my mind? That's an injuring space.

3154
02:56:53.000 --> 02:56:57.079
<v Speaker 59>I see Islam, Athis, Catholic, Protestantsagnostic, Mormons.

3155
02:56:57.879 --> 02:56:59.000
<v Speaker 7>I don't see scientos.

3156
02:57:01.040 --> 02:57:04.159
<v Speaker 4>Well, there's there's limits, there's limited spaces up there.

3157
02:57:04.280 --> 02:57:09.959
<v Speaker 59>So okay, well I'm independent though I have no affiliation

3158
02:57:10.200 --> 02:57:11.680
<v Speaker 59>with the fucking church.

3159
02:57:13.280 --> 02:57:16.120
<v Speaker 7>So I want you to take part in the discussion.

3160
02:57:16.239 --> 02:57:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Some people are laughing. I like that.

3161
02:57:19.280 --> 02:57:23.120
<v Speaker 59>As as an independent, as an India. Okay, if I

3162
02:57:23.159 --> 02:57:25.200
<v Speaker 59>can fat, if.

3163
02:57:25.120 --> 02:57:28.959
<v Speaker 7>I can fit. As I understand.

3164
02:57:29.040 --> 02:57:33.760
<v Speaker 59>The space is about, you know, cosmic stuff and the

3165
02:57:34.159 --> 02:57:35.959
<v Speaker 59>religions like that.

3166
02:57:36.479 --> 02:57:41.159
<v Speaker 4>It is about all of this bullshet bro. Yes, what

3167
02:57:41.360 --> 02:57:44.760
<v Speaker 4>is on your mind? What does your buh?

3168
02:57:45.120 --> 02:57:46.920
<v Speaker 7>Why are you talking like in Pakistani.

3169
02:57:47.079 --> 02:57:49.120
<v Speaker 4>I am trying to talk to you to vibe with

3170
02:57:49.239 --> 02:57:49.600
<v Speaker 4>your brother.

3171
02:57:50.559 --> 02:57:54.479
<v Speaker 7>Oh no, my is my accent so Pakistan?

3172
02:57:54.600 --> 02:57:58.760
<v Speaker 4>Okay, bro, I don't you were from India, not Pakistan by.

3173
02:57:58.760 --> 02:57:59.680
<v Speaker 2>India, right right?

3174
02:58:00.319 --> 02:58:04.079
<v Speaker 7>Okay, I'm trying to do the American accent being a Greek.

3175
02:58:03.879 --> 02:58:05.559
<v Speaker 4>And I am trying to talk to you in your

3176
02:58:05.639 --> 02:58:06.719
<v Speaker 4>own native tongue.

3177
02:58:07.479 --> 02:58:10.479
<v Speaker 15>Yes, okay, they took the stones from here.

3178
02:58:11.920 --> 02:58:14.360
<v Speaker 7>Well my tongue, My tongue is an ancient tongue.

3179
02:58:14.559 --> 02:58:18.440
<v Speaker 2>My friend is a Greek tongue. It told the world.

3180
02:58:19.520 --> 02:58:26.520
<v Speaker 59>But now I'm intervening here. Maybe maybe your listeners.

3181
02:58:26.040 --> 02:58:30.639
<v Speaker 4>Are are you Greek or are you Pakistani or Indian?

3182
02:58:31.239 --> 02:58:32.879
<v Speaker 2>Greek? Oh? Greek?

3183
02:58:32.959 --> 02:58:34.879
<v Speaker 7>I'm Greek, full full bloody Greek.

3184
02:58:35.159 --> 02:58:37.639
<v Speaker 4>Well will you sound a straight up Hindu over here?

3185
02:58:38.440 --> 02:58:38.639
<v Speaker 27>Yeah?

3186
02:58:38.719 --> 02:58:43.879
<v Speaker 59>Okay, Well I wanted to intervene and interject like a

3187
02:58:43.959 --> 02:58:46.959
<v Speaker 59>little bit of scientology or has got.

3188
02:58:46.799 --> 02:58:50.440
<v Speaker 4>A patrolling there? No way, you're a Greek scientologist?

3189
02:58:50.520 --> 02:58:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Come on, yes, yes I am.

3190
02:58:52.600 --> 02:58:52.840
<v Speaker 54>I am.

3191
02:58:53.760 --> 02:58:56.639
<v Speaker 4>Wait a minute, so all the religions are bullshit, but

3192
02:58:56.879 --> 02:58:59.639
<v Speaker 4>like space staatee and alien ship is real?

3193
02:58:59.719 --> 02:59:00.959
<v Speaker 2>Come on, Oh, you.

3194
02:59:02.719 --> 02:59:10.719
<v Speaker 4>You're trolling to get that is the most Indian Greek, dude,

3195
02:59:10.719 --> 02:59:18.200
<v Speaker 4>I've ever heard in my life. Noah, everyone hubberd doers

3196
02:59:18.280 --> 02:59:19.200
<v Speaker 4>did grouse from me?

3197
02:59:20.799 --> 02:59:21.680
<v Speaker 8>Are you from Greece?

3198
02:59:21.719 --> 02:59:21.959
<v Speaker 2>Brother?

3199
02:59:22.639 --> 02:59:26.479
<v Speaker 4>They took their stones from here? Noah, I'm you?

3200
02:59:29.079 --> 02:59:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Can you mean awesome? I just have a question. I

3201
02:59:34.559 --> 02:59:36.000
<v Speaker 2>was wondering because.

3202
02:59:35.719 --> 02:59:38.600
<v Speaker 18>I've been getting into trying to study ecclesiology across the

3203
02:59:38.719 --> 02:59:39.840
<v Speaker 18>denominational lines.

3204
02:59:39.879 --> 02:59:41.719
<v Speaker 2>A little bit would last little while.

3205
02:59:42.239 --> 02:59:47.239
<v Speaker 31>How does the what is the Orthodox conception of the church,

3206
02:59:48.520 --> 02:59:51.440
<v Speaker 31>and how does that relate to its claim to being one?

3207
02:59:52.079 --> 02:59:54.319
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so I said multiple times, I'm not doing f

3208
02:59:54.399 --> 02:59:57.680
<v Speaker 4>a q tonight. Tonight is debate. So what do you

3209
02:59:57.760 --> 02:59:59.559
<v Speaker 4>mean the Orthodox Church is to claim to be the

3210
02:59:59.639 --> 03:00:02.360
<v Speaker 4>one Church? Not trying to be rude, just saying its

3211
03:00:02.479 --> 03:00:04.120
<v Speaker 4>claim is that it's the one true church. It's not

3212
03:00:04.719 --> 03:00:07.239
<v Speaker 4>faq tonight. So if you're calling in to be faq,

3213
03:00:07.559 --> 03:00:09.959
<v Speaker 4>please don't do it. Valantine Claudi, you.

3214
03:00:17.799 --> 03:00:22.559
<v Speaker 57>Hi, Jacob bless your brother's I'm going to lease the

3215
03:00:22.680 --> 03:00:25.840
<v Speaker 57>rth bus and I had to pay with a growman

3216
03:00:25.920 --> 03:00:29.040
<v Speaker 57>Catholic and you're very knowledge bog the boys think so.

3217
03:00:29.159 --> 03:00:31.799
<v Speaker 57>He said that in the first dozen years the church,

3218
03:00:32.600 --> 03:00:34.479
<v Speaker 57>nobody called the Church Orthodox.

3219
03:00:34.559 --> 03:00:36.959
<v Speaker 2>It was always Catholic and the name comes after kiss.

3220
03:00:37.520 --> 03:00:38.639
<v Speaker 2>What's your argument against it?

3221
03:00:39.920 --> 03:00:43.280
<v Speaker 4>The stupidest argument I've heard in about two years, because

3222
03:00:44.200 --> 03:00:47.120
<v Speaker 4>the name itself does not tell you that it's the

3223
03:00:47.239 --> 03:00:50.319
<v Speaker 4>papist church. I mean, that's so stupid. Like we call

3224
03:00:50.399 --> 03:00:53.280
<v Speaker 4>it the Orthodox Catholic Church. The idea that because the

3225
03:00:53.399 --> 03:00:56.200
<v Speaker 4>church fathers called it the Catholic Church, that that means

3226
03:00:56.319 --> 03:01:00.319
<v Speaker 4>papacy is literally like get some new friends. That's all

3227
03:01:00.360 --> 03:01:02.440
<v Speaker 4>I gotta say on no one, Dave, what's up? Dave?

3228
03:01:03.440 --> 03:01:06.959
<v Speaker 4>For having fun tonight open forum debate. Please don't ask

3229
03:01:07.040 --> 03:01:09.879
<v Speaker 4>me the FAQ's and the catechumen questions. That's not what

3230
03:01:09.920 --> 03:01:14.559
<v Speaker 4>we're doing tonight. I want more Greek Hindu scientologists, That's

3231
03:01:14.600 --> 03:01:15.040
<v Speaker 4>what I want.

3232
03:01:17.840 --> 03:01:23.799
<v Speaker 43>Hey, last question, when you did your debate with Trent Horne,

3233
03:01:24.040 --> 03:01:25.799
<v Speaker 43>and he asked the question of.

3234
03:01:27.280 --> 03:01:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Was there any kind of y'all's debate on natural theology?

3235
03:01:30.559 --> 03:01:34.520
<v Speaker 2>When was there any ecumenical council that condemned.

3236
03:01:36.360 --> 03:01:39.959
<v Speaker 43>Natural theology or the tomistic idea of natural theology?

3237
03:01:40.000 --> 03:01:42.239
<v Speaker 4>And you, if I remember.

3238
03:01:42.000 --> 03:01:44.239
<v Speaker 2>Correctly, you said the Seventh Ecumenical Council.

3239
03:01:44.719 --> 03:01:47.600
<v Speaker 4>I said, my extension, the idea would be condemned. Obviously

3240
03:01:47.639 --> 03:01:50.159
<v Speaker 4>it's not going to condemn Thomas Aquinas since its centuries

3241
03:01:50.200 --> 03:01:53.000
<v Speaker 4>before his existence. But yeah, the reason I said that

3242
03:01:53.120 --> 03:01:57.959
<v Speaker 4>is that the iconographic theology of the Church would implicitly

3243
03:01:58.120 --> 03:02:01.200
<v Speaker 4>be a rejection of the idea that nature can be

3244
03:02:01.479 --> 03:02:05.600
<v Speaker 4>understood without reference to divine revelation through pure reasoning and

3245
03:02:05.639 --> 03:02:08.879
<v Speaker 4>all this kind of nonsense, because for us, nature and

3246
03:02:09.319 --> 03:02:11.639
<v Speaker 4>the creative world is that they often it's a christophany,

3247
03:02:12.079 --> 03:02:14.200
<v Speaker 4>and that's foreign to the mind of the Roman cals.

3248
03:02:15.079 --> 03:02:16.559
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, thank you.

3249
03:02:16.799 --> 03:02:19.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's what I was referring to. Obviously, I wasn't saying.

3250
03:02:19.239 --> 03:02:22.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying you're saying this, but some Roman calliy.

3251
03:02:22.760 --> 03:02:24.399
<v Speaker 8>Oh he's so, he's so stupid.

3252
03:02:24.479 --> 03:02:31.639
<v Speaker 4>He thinks that they condemned to Thomas Glory existed. No, bro,

3253
03:02:31.760 --> 03:02:36.399
<v Speaker 4>get out of here. We're trying to bring great Orthodox scientology.

3254
03:02:36.479 --> 03:02:50.719
<v Speaker 4>Come on, man, Richard Bruno, Jordano Bruno, what's up? Yep? Richard?

3255
03:02:51.680 --> 03:02:56.239
<v Speaker 2>Oh as you do? Hey, I just have a question

3256
03:02:56.680 --> 03:03:00.680
<v Speaker 2>about evolution, and I know you don't even evolution.

3257
03:03:01.399 --> 03:03:03.159
<v Speaker 60>And I saw this argument that you were having with

3258
03:03:03.239 --> 03:03:06.600
<v Speaker 60>this lady and she was talking about the archaeological evidence.

3259
03:03:07.200 --> 03:03:10.920
<v Speaker 60>But why didn't you accept that? I understand that she

3260
03:03:11.040 --> 03:03:13.600
<v Speaker 60>was like quoting some scholars that she didn't understand. She

3261
03:03:13.680 --> 03:03:16.879
<v Speaker 60>didn't she wasn't able to recall them. But why is

3262
03:03:16.959 --> 03:03:19.120
<v Speaker 60>it that that wasn't a good argument.

3263
03:03:20.040 --> 03:03:22.319
<v Speaker 4>I don't even remember what you're referring to. But can

3264
03:03:22.399 --> 03:03:26.200
<v Speaker 4>you rephrase like what she was saying or kind of

3265
03:03:27.040 --> 03:03:29.959
<v Speaker 4>rehearse like what what it was? I mean, it's not

3266
03:03:30.000 --> 03:03:32.600
<v Speaker 4>a good argument, by the way, too. I mean my

3267
03:03:32.719 --> 03:03:35.200
<v Speaker 4>first thought was she was probably just citing scholars, and

3268
03:03:35.280 --> 03:03:36.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm like, why is that? Why am I supposed to

3269
03:03:37.000 --> 03:03:41.079
<v Speaker 4>just accept random scholars or academics. I'm very skeptical about

3270
03:03:41.159 --> 03:03:44.799
<v Speaker 4>academics and claims of any academics because I've been in

3271
03:03:45.000 --> 03:03:46.879
<v Speaker 4>the world of academia. I know what it's like. And

3272
03:03:46.959 --> 03:03:48.639
<v Speaker 4>by the way, if you think I'm an idiot, that

3273
03:03:48.920 --> 03:03:51.959
<v Speaker 4>also disproves academia because I'm actually a peer review published

3274
03:03:51.959 --> 03:03:56.239
<v Speaker 4>in academia, so that that itself disproves peer review.

3275
03:03:58.799 --> 03:04:02.239
<v Speaker 2>I see. Okay, yeah, I mean that's basically what it was. Yeah,

3276
03:04:02.319 --> 03:04:04.799
<v Speaker 2>that she would bring up scholars.

3277
03:04:05.000 --> 03:04:07.120
<v Speaker 4>Okay, well, then I'll cite all the scholars who disagree,

3278
03:04:07.200 --> 03:04:07.639
<v Speaker 4>So now what.

3279
03:04:09.280 --> 03:04:14.200
<v Speaker 2>That's a good point actually, Okay.

3280
03:04:14.000 --> 03:04:17.040
<v Speaker 4>Wow, so scholars are like, you know that they can be.

3281
03:04:18.280 --> 03:04:19.879
<v Speaker 4>It's kind of like a courtroom if you think about

3282
03:04:19.879 --> 03:04:23.520
<v Speaker 4>a courtroom, and you know in the courtroom they'll bring

3283
03:04:23.639 --> 03:04:28.520
<v Speaker 4>in expert witnesses or expert testimony, and then the expert

3284
03:04:28.600 --> 03:04:32.079
<v Speaker 4>comes in and says, it is my expert opinion that

3285
03:04:32.399 --> 03:04:36.639
<v Speaker 4>Jeffrey Dahmer had to have conducted these murders because of

3286
03:04:36.760 --> 03:04:40.319
<v Speaker 4>the genetic evidence and because of his profile. And then

3287
03:04:40.600 --> 03:04:44.120
<v Speaker 4>the jury says, this is an expert, and he gives

3288
03:04:44.159 --> 03:04:46.840
<v Speaker 4>a good testimony as to why it must be the case. Now,

3289
03:04:47.360 --> 03:04:52.959
<v Speaker 4>does that necessarily prove that he did it on its own?

3290
03:04:53.600 --> 03:04:59.200
<v Speaker 4>Not necessarily, so it's an evidence, but strict analytic or

3291
03:04:59.479 --> 03:05:05.799
<v Speaker 4>logical or whatever proof. No one scholar's attestation to something

3292
03:05:06.319 --> 03:05:09.479
<v Speaker 4>in this domain unless it's something that's about like an

3293
03:05:09.680 --> 03:05:14.760
<v Speaker 4>actual argument or proof that's like logical that could That's

3294
03:05:14.799 --> 03:05:16.479
<v Speaker 4>like the only time I can think we're an expert

3295
03:05:16.600 --> 03:05:20.399
<v Speaker 4>is right when it's like an expert math argument and

3296
03:05:20.520 --> 03:05:23.760
<v Speaker 4>the expert shows that his argument is objectively the case. Okay,

3297
03:05:23.959 --> 03:05:26.479
<v Speaker 4>and that's in that case, but it's not true because

3298
03:05:26.479 --> 03:05:29.120
<v Speaker 4>it's from an expert. That's the fells this authority fil

3299
03:05:29.159 --> 03:05:35.360
<v Speaker 4>appealed authority fallacy. So testimony of experts can be evidences,

3300
03:05:35.440 --> 03:05:39.639
<v Speaker 4>they can be attestations, but they're not proofs. But you

3301
03:05:39.719 --> 03:05:42.680
<v Speaker 4>got so many low tier atheist people or Reddit people

3302
03:05:43.079 --> 03:05:46.319
<v Speaker 4>remember t Jump, Remember when we were debating. He's like, well,

3303
03:05:46.639 --> 03:05:49.840
<v Speaker 4>the majority of the science men say this, so it's true.

3304
03:05:50.559 --> 03:05:52.159
<v Speaker 4>And I'm like, you actually think that it's true because

3305
03:05:52.200 --> 03:05:54.319
<v Speaker 4>the majority of science, Like he'd say, yes, that's what

3306
03:05:54.440 --> 03:05:58.600
<v Speaker 4>makes something true. That's so stupid these you are. It's cult.

3307
03:05:58.680 --> 03:06:02.440
<v Speaker 4>If you have a disagreement, that's what we're doing tonight. Disagreements.

3308
03:06:02.520 --> 03:06:06.079
<v Speaker 4>Please don't ask me the FAQ's.

3309
03:06:09.719 --> 03:06:13.040
<v Speaker 12>Hello, yop, Sorry, that might be.

3310
03:06:13.040 --> 03:06:14.959
<v Speaker 2>A ridiculous question, might not be worth your time.

3311
03:06:15.000 --> 03:06:17.719
<v Speaker 61>But because it might seem a little eye but I've

3312
03:06:17.760 --> 03:06:19.520
<v Speaker 61>been trying to do a lot of research on what

3313
03:06:19.639 --> 03:06:23.360
<v Speaker 61>the Church fathers thought on the biblical canon, and something

3314
03:06:23.399 --> 03:06:27.159
<v Speaker 61>a lot of Protestants point to is Letter thirty nine

3315
03:06:27.399 --> 03:06:31.319
<v Speaker 61>or from Saint Affinatius, where interestingly enough is canon is

3316
03:06:31.399 --> 03:06:33.040
<v Speaker 61>closer to the Protestant with the.

3317
03:06:33.040 --> 03:06:37.239
<v Speaker 4>Exception that's well, that's the New Testament, and he's got

3318
03:06:37.319 --> 03:06:39.280
<v Speaker 4>Old Testament books that are not the Protestant canon.

3319
03:06:40.799 --> 03:06:42.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well you just don't explain.

3320
03:06:42.879 --> 03:06:46.000
<v Speaker 61>So he lists the Old Testament canon first, and then

3321
03:06:46.040 --> 03:06:48.360
<v Speaker 61>he lists the New Testament, and then interestingly enough, at

3322
03:06:48.399 --> 03:06:51.879
<v Speaker 61>the end he lists some of the Jutero canonical books.

3323
03:06:52.200 --> 03:06:54.959
<v Speaker 61>But what I find particularly strange is I don't know

3324
03:06:55.040 --> 03:06:57.360
<v Speaker 61>why he puts the Judo can in a separate section

3325
03:06:57.440 --> 03:06:59.079
<v Speaker 61>when he cites them all throughout his works.

3326
03:06:59.120 --> 03:07:03.079
<v Speaker 4>I don't quite get that, because oftentimes it's been classed

3327
03:07:03.239 --> 03:07:07.200
<v Speaker 4>as second canon, so works that are not as important,

3328
03:07:07.799 --> 03:07:11.159
<v Speaker 4>and even the Orthodox Church like Roman Catholics and people,

3329
03:07:11.159 --> 03:07:14.879
<v Speaker 4>they love to cite the Catechism of Metropolitan Filaret because

3330
03:07:14.879 --> 03:07:17.799
<v Speaker 4>when he lists the canon, he lists what is the

3331
03:07:17.959 --> 03:07:22.760
<v Speaker 4>non deuterocanonical list, and then like two questions down he says,

3332
03:07:23.079 --> 03:07:26.000
<v Speaker 4>and we also hold to the dudocanonical books. So they've

3333
03:07:26.040 --> 03:07:29.319
<v Speaker 4>always been classed as second canon. But that doesn't mean

3334
03:07:29.360 --> 03:07:30.840
<v Speaker 4>that they're not part of the canon, because they're a

3335
03:07:30.840 --> 03:07:33.799
<v Speaker 4>separate class. So it's just's like a Protestant thing where

3336
03:07:33.840 --> 03:07:36.399
<v Speaker 4>they do this. But by the way, like, if you're

3337
03:07:36.440 --> 03:07:38.879
<v Speaker 4>a Protestant, why are we supposed to follow Anthonatius like

3338
03:07:39.399 --> 03:07:39.879
<v Speaker 4>says who.

3339
03:07:42.559 --> 03:07:43.159
<v Speaker 2>If you don't mind?

3340
03:07:43.239 --> 03:07:45.319
<v Speaker 61>On top of that, and as a protest of myself,

3341
03:07:45.319 --> 03:07:46.680
<v Speaker 61>I got to be honest with you, this ain't a

3342
03:07:46.760 --> 03:07:47.559
<v Speaker 61>fun thing to admit.

3343
03:07:47.639 --> 03:07:50.639
<v Speaker 2>But another one they go to is sinks Thrill of Jerusalem.

3344
03:07:51.040 --> 03:07:53.879
<v Speaker 61>But if they actually read the whole passage, he doesn't

3345
03:07:53.879 --> 03:07:54.719
<v Speaker 61>include Revelation.

3346
03:07:54.959 --> 03:08:00.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't, yeah, exactly, because there's hotly disputed books that

3347
03:08:01.239 --> 03:08:04.040
<v Speaker 4>take a long time centuries for the church all over

3348
03:08:04.159 --> 03:08:07.760
<v Speaker 4>to except so obviously the church is not operating on

3349
03:08:07.840 --> 03:08:11.079
<v Speaker 4>solid scriptura for those centuries. James White admits that the

3350
03:08:11.159 --> 03:08:13.440
<v Speaker 4>Church wasn't operating on solo scripture in those centuries and

3351
03:08:13.520 --> 03:08:16.399
<v Speaker 4>his debate with Trent Horne, so thank you exactly. So

3352
03:08:16.479 --> 03:08:19.840
<v Speaker 4>therefore solo scriptura is not the ancient church's position.

3353
03:08:20.680 --> 03:08:22.159
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, it's just one last thing.

3354
03:08:22.239 --> 03:08:25.479
<v Speaker 61>Sorry, It's just that I was reading some Saint Augustin.

3355
03:08:25.120 --> 03:08:26.840
<v Speaker 2>And my account might be off.

3356
03:08:26.879 --> 03:08:28.520
<v Speaker 61>But in the City of God, I think he quotes

3357
03:08:28.559 --> 03:08:31.399
<v Speaker 61>the Dudo of Canon roughly forty eight comes and again,

3358
03:08:31.520 --> 03:08:33.719
<v Speaker 61>like you know, reform to Bros and Lutherans, they love

3359
03:08:33.760 --> 03:08:36.000
<v Speaker 61>aughust him, but they don't like his canon. And I

3360
03:08:36.159 --> 03:08:38.079
<v Speaker 61>just think that's kind of arbitrary, like how did you

3361
03:08:38.079 --> 03:08:39.920
<v Speaker 61>get original Sin right and the Trinity right?

3362
03:08:40.000 --> 03:08:41.200
<v Speaker 2>But he got the canon wrong?

3363
03:08:42.239 --> 03:08:47.040
<v Speaker 4>Well again, in the Protestant position, it's completely arbitrary as

3364
03:08:47.079 --> 03:08:49.399
<v Speaker 4>to why we're supposed to pick this or that church

3365
03:08:49.479 --> 03:08:53.600
<v Speaker 4>father's canon. And if you're a consistent Protestant or a

3366
03:08:53.639 --> 03:08:57.520
<v Speaker 4>Classical Reformation Protestant, all those people don't have the Gospel

3367
03:08:57.520 --> 03:08:59.799
<v Speaker 4>anyway because they taught salvation by works and they didn't

3368
03:08:59.799 --> 03:09:01.799
<v Speaker 4>believe been sola fe day. So why are we listening

3369
03:09:01.799 --> 03:09:03.559
<v Speaker 4>to all these heretics about where the cannon comes from?

3370
03:09:03.639 --> 03:09:05.760
<v Speaker 4>It's just all the whole position is stupid. But thank

3371
03:09:05.799 --> 03:09:08.159
<v Speaker 4>you for the questions. I appreciate that, and I plugged

3372
03:09:08.639 --> 03:09:13.200
<v Speaker 4>your investigation on those topics. It's open debate. So it

3373
03:09:13.239 --> 03:09:16.440
<v Speaker 4>looks like we've whittled down to three people who always

3374
03:09:16.680 --> 03:09:18.959
<v Speaker 4>ask theological questions. I'm not mad, I'm not fussing at

3375
03:09:19.000 --> 03:09:21.799
<v Speaker 4>you guys, but tonight is for people who disagree. And

3376
03:09:21.840 --> 03:09:23.399
<v Speaker 4>no matter how many times I say that, you guys

3377
03:09:23.399 --> 03:09:26.559
<v Speaker 4>will then ask me a orthodox I f AQ question.

3378
03:09:27.479 --> 03:09:29.760
<v Speaker 4>Does anybody disagree? You go to the head of the line.

3379
03:09:31.680 --> 03:09:33.920
<v Speaker 4>It's only been three hours. I thought that this prominent

3380
03:09:33.959 --> 03:09:37.239
<v Speaker 4>Roman Catholic dy was gonna come where's he Let's see

3381
03:09:37.280 --> 03:09:41.840
<v Speaker 4>if he replied he said, I'll pop in three hours ago,

3382
03:09:43.159 --> 03:09:47.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna tell him to come hurry up, Come on, dude. Uh,

3383
03:09:57.040 --> 03:10:02.719
<v Speaker 4>somebody said, is this your U bitcoin lightning address? No,

3384
03:10:02.879 --> 03:10:08.719
<v Speaker 4>this is just the regular native segue. Uh, it's not

3385
03:10:08.879 --> 03:10:35.600
<v Speaker 4>the lightning address. Anybody else? All right, Well I don't

3386
03:10:35.600 --> 03:10:37.760
<v Speaker 4>see anybody else here. We go, Jayhawk? What's up in?

3387
03:10:48.760 --> 03:10:50.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I disagree with.

3388
03:10:53.000 --> 03:10:56.200
<v Speaker 33>Your stance on pride being a godly attribute.

3389
03:10:57.920 --> 03:10:58.719
<v Speaker 4>What are you talking about?

3390
03:10:59.760 --> 03:11:00.520
<v Speaker 2>What that? I say that?

3391
03:11:01.559 --> 03:11:04.319
<v Speaker 33>The tone, the prideful tone in your voice.

3392
03:11:04.680 --> 03:11:05.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, you sound pride right now.

3393
03:11:07.639 --> 03:11:08.879
<v Speaker 2>Well I never.

3394
03:11:10.440 --> 03:11:15.760
<v Speaker 4>Claimed I wasn't, but o, So pride's okay for you?

3395
03:11:15.920 --> 03:11:16.319
<v Speaker 4>Enough for me?

3396
03:11:17.079 --> 03:11:18.879
<v Speaker 2>No, it's both. It's bad for both of us.

3397
03:11:20.000 --> 03:11:21.799
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Well, then take the mode out of your own eye?

3398
03:11:21.840 --> 03:11:22.559
<v Speaker 4>What are you talking about?

3399
03:11:27.760 --> 03:11:27.959
<v Speaker 2>Okay?

3400
03:11:28.000 --> 03:11:29.399
<v Speaker 4>Are you trolling or I don't understand?

3401
03:11:31.559 --> 03:11:33.479
<v Speaker 2>Well, you just sound a bit prideful, that's all.

3402
03:11:33.719 --> 03:11:36.799
<v Speaker 4>Okay. Do you have an argument?

3403
03:11:40.239 --> 03:11:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Be more humble?

3404
03:11:42.559 --> 03:11:59.479
<v Speaker 4>Okay, that's really pious, man, raw race, you gotta mute.

3405
03:12:00.760 --> 03:12:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay. Sorry. So I'm Orthodox and I have two questions.

3406
03:12:05.159 --> 03:12:08.159
<v Speaker 4>I hope I'm not doing a questions man, I'm not

3407
03:12:08.280 --> 03:12:16.680
<v Speaker 4>doing that. Catholics cargus. Look where people who disagree.

3408
03:12:18.120 --> 03:12:20.559
<v Speaker 2>Hey, I don't disagree, but I'm an Orthodox in choir.

3409
03:12:20.680 --> 03:12:22.879
<v Speaker 56>And this guy asked me, is it seems kind of

3410
03:12:22.879 --> 03:12:25.719
<v Speaker 56>like a dumb question, but he said, if God is

3411
03:12:26.040 --> 03:12:29.760
<v Speaker 56>fully uncreated then and he's like transcendent, then how.

3412
03:12:29.719 --> 03:12:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Does he interact with us if we are created? Essentially

3413
03:12:33.479 --> 03:12:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's just a dumb question.

3414
03:12:35.120 --> 03:12:37.200
<v Speaker 4>That's the purpose of the essence center the distinction. It's

3415
03:12:37.200 --> 03:12:39.399
<v Speaker 4>a good question. And if you read read letter two

3416
03:12:39.479 --> 03:12:44.840
<v Speaker 4>thirty four of Basil and he addresses that very question. Oh,

3417
03:12:45.360 --> 03:12:52.559
<v Speaker 4>let's uh, here'll tell us more about your humility. You

3418
03:12:52.680 --> 03:12:58.120
<v Speaker 4>have to unmute, Jayhawk. You have to unmute.

3419
03:13:02.239 --> 03:13:05.319
<v Speaker 2>Uh. I you were cutting out so I didn't even

3420
03:13:05.319 --> 03:13:05.920
<v Speaker 2>hear what you said.

3421
03:13:06.440 --> 03:13:11.479
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, well, you requested to come back, so please enlighten

3422
03:13:11.600 --> 03:13:12.600
<v Speaker 4>us about your virtue.

3423
03:13:13.920 --> 03:13:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh I did. Oh my mistake. I didn't mean to

3424
03:13:17.239 --> 03:13:18.239
<v Speaker 2>request to come back.

3425
03:13:18.639 --> 03:13:40.280
<v Speaker 8>Okay, casey, hey Jay, can you hear me?

3426
03:13:41.200 --> 03:13:42.399
<v Speaker 34>It's an annoying question to ask.

3427
03:13:42.760 --> 03:13:46.280
<v Speaker 11>Ask anyway, Okay, quick question, Thanks for having me on again.

3428
03:13:46.360 --> 03:13:55.239
<v Speaker 33>Though, when can we say, uh that the Orientals were.

3429
03:13:55.360 --> 03:13:57.479
<v Speaker 62>Officially out of communion?

3430
03:13:57.680 --> 03:14:00.799
<v Speaker 33>And it's it's kind of just a question that connects to.

3431
03:14:01.920 --> 03:14:05.079
<v Speaker 4>Tonight, right, So tonight I said, we're doing debate, so

3432
03:14:05.120 --> 03:14:08.079
<v Speaker 4>it's people who disagree, So please don't ask me the

3433
03:14:08.479 --> 03:14:10.520
<v Speaker 4>orthodox I f AQ questions. I'm not mad at you.

3434
03:14:10.559 --> 03:14:21.319
<v Speaker 4>I'm just saying it's for people who disagree. Cody clearest talent, Okay,

3435
03:14:21.399 --> 03:14:23.239
<v Speaker 4>here's my claim. If you believe the witness of the

3436
03:14:23.319 --> 03:14:25.680
<v Speaker 4>resurrection is enough to believe in the resurrection. I never

3437
03:14:25.840 --> 03:14:30.680
<v Speaker 4>argued that evidentialism, so it has nothing to do with

3438
03:14:30.760 --> 03:14:34.079
<v Speaker 4>your terrible Book of Mormon argument. DC would work at

3439
03:14:34.079 --> 03:14:35.959
<v Speaker 4>three dollars, Thank you so much, William Die. Three dollars.

3440
03:14:36.399 --> 03:14:41.239
<v Speaker 4>What's the refutation of Darwinism of ninety percent being identical

3441
03:14:41.280 --> 03:14:45.920
<v Speaker 4>to apes and DNA? Well, I mean that small percentage

3442
03:14:45.920 --> 03:14:48.840
<v Speaker 4>of difference is very close. For example, we're very close

3443
03:14:48.920 --> 03:14:51.719
<v Speaker 4>to lizards, and I'm pretty sure there's a pretty big

3444
03:14:51.760 --> 03:14:54.360
<v Speaker 4>difference between us and a lizard, even if it's only

3445
03:14:54.360 --> 03:14:57.920
<v Speaker 4>a three percent difference. Anonymous, five dollars. What's the best

3446
03:14:58.040 --> 03:15:02.360
<v Speaker 4>argument against two god gospel heresy? I don't know what

3447
03:15:02.520 --> 03:15:04.680
<v Speaker 4>you mean, like dual covenant theology. I don't know what

3448
03:15:04.760 --> 03:15:11.639
<v Speaker 4>two gospel heresy is. If you believe in solar scriptura, Uh, well,

3449
03:15:11.680 --> 03:15:16.719
<v Speaker 4>I would just argue the canon. But the two gospel heresy.

3450
03:15:19.879 --> 03:15:23.600
<v Speaker 4>You know, in the first hour I was giving arguments

3451
03:15:23.639 --> 03:15:27.920
<v Speaker 4>about the continuity of the scriptures, So these people believe

3452
03:15:27.959 --> 03:15:30.799
<v Speaker 4>that Paul taught a different gospel to the Gentiles. Paul

3453
03:15:30.840 --> 03:15:33.399
<v Speaker 4>appeals in the Gospel of Relatis to being the same

3454
03:15:33.479 --> 03:15:36.479
<v Speaker 4>gospel taught in the Old Testament. Jesus says, Abraham believed

3455
03:15:36.479 --> 03:15:39.319
<v Speaker 4>in him, so the idea that there's two gospels is ridiculous.

3456
03:15:41.479 --> 03:15:44.000
<v Speaker 4>Paul says, all of the covenants are yay in him

3457
03:15:44.040 --> 03:15:48.159
<v Speaker 4>to the Corinthians. Cook's MC seven, your pink shirt is

3458
03:15:48.239 --> 03:15:51.360
<v Speaker 4>on fire. Why are you mean he's joking? I appreciate that.

3459
03:15:51.520 --> 03:15:54.399
<v Speaker 4>Spikes Begel seven three three zero. Can you list material

3460
03:15:54.479 --> 03:15:58.399
<v Speaker 4>refuting dispensationalism. I mean, we did a four hour live

3461
03:15:58.479 --> 03:16:01.200
<v Speaker 4>stream with Jimbob on that I need to get these

3462
03:16:01.280 --> 03:16:04.239
<v Speaker 4>arguments together against evangelicals. Go to Jimbob's stream and watch

3463
03:16:04.559 --> 03:16:08.639
<v Speaker 4>me and Posh dissecting it for four hours. Hypatios five dollars.

3464
03:16:09.159 --> 03:16:12.520
<v Speaker 4>Thank you for calling Mormonism a cult. That guy needed

3465
03:16:12.520 --> 03:16:15.920
<v Speaker 4>to hear that it is a cult. I'm sure there's

3466
03:16:15.959 --> 03:16:20.079
<v Speaker 4>many well meaning people, so I'm not saying that I

3467
03:16:20.360 --> 03:16:23.760
<v Speaker 4>hate you or something like that, but it is clearly

3468
03:16:23.879 --> 03:16:27.719
<v Speaker 4>some it's a I mean, I mean, if you believe

3469
03:16:27.799 --> 03:16:31.600
<v Speaker 4>that the wacky tales of all of the Mormon stuff.

3470
03:16:31.639 --> 03:16:37.559
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Lucas ten dollars is the Western right heretical.

3471
03:16:38.120 --> 03:16:40.639
<v Speaker 4>It's not the right that's heretical. It's that many people

3472
03:16:40.760 --> 03:16:42.719
<v Speaker 4>want to bring in all the Roman Catholic doctrines that

3473
03:16:42.760 --> 03:16:47.280
<v Speaker 4>are heretical. Mark ten Dollars, I know Arabic some I'm

3474
03:16:47.360 --> 03:16:53.639
<v Speaker 4>convinced Mohammed was some spiritual title that was given. It

3475
03:16:53.799 --> 03:16:59.680
<v Speaker 4>is rendered in MHMD and without vowels. Yeah, okay, I

3476
03:16:59.719 --> 03:17:03.399
<v Speaker 4>don't have any position on that. Maybe that's true. It

3477
03:17:03.520 --> 03:17:07.399
<v Speaker 4>is a title like Christ. Yeah, I know people are

3478
03:17:07.479 --> 03:17:10.399
<v Speaker 4>arguing this. I don't know enough about this position to argue,

3479
03:17:10.399 --> 03:17:12.239
<v Speaker 4>and I think it's I mean, it's like trying to

3480
03:17:12.319 --> 03:17:17.040
<v Speaker 4>argue I disprove Jesus as a historical person. Let's just

3481
03:17:17.200 --> 03:17:19.639
<v Speaker 4>argue the text itself and then, I mean, that's an easier,

3482
03:17:20.159 --> 03:17:23.799
<v Speaker 4>more accessible, clear contradiction between what the Koran says and

3483
03:17:24.000 --> 03:17:27.159
<v Speaker 4>previous revelation. That's the easiest argument. I mean, if you

3484
03:17:27.239 --> 03:17:29.319
<v Speaker 4>try to go into these historical I'm going to disprove

3485
03:17:29.399 --> 03:17:31.639
<v Speaker 4>the existence of Muhammed, You're just going to be spitting

3486
03:17:31.719 --> 03:17:36.040
<v Speaker 4>scholars back and forth to infinity. Christen ten Dollars, thank

3487
03:17:36.079 --> 03:17:39.760
<v Speaker 4>you for continued slang opposition. Thank you, CHRISTI appreciate that. Cody,

3488
03:17:39.799 --> 03:17:40.120
<v Speaker 4>what's up?

3489
03:17:40.159 --> 03:17:43.959
<v Speaker 2>Man? What's up? Jake? Can you hear me?

3490
03:17:44.399 --> 03:17:46.040
<v Speaker 4>Huh? Do you have a disagreement or debate?

3491
03:17:47.799 --> 03:17:50.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I wanted to bring up, like the Mormon point

3492
03:17:50.159 --> 03:17:51.879
<v Speaker 2>of view and just I wanted to like get.

3493
03:17:51.760 --> 03:17:53.799
<v Speaker 63>Some some thoughts from you, not saying that I want

3494
03:17:53.840 --> 03:17:55.879
<v Speaker 63>to like, actually, I'm not saying I believe that.

3495
03:17:55.959 --> 03:17:57.600
<v Speaker 2>But I'm just saying, like, I just want to represent

3496
03:17:57.680 --> 03:17:58.280
<v Speaker 2>it for an argument.

3497
03:17:59.239 --> 03:18:01.159
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Mormon friends or something.

3498
03:18:02.360 --> 03:18:04.440
<v Speaker 63>I have a history of being in Utah, so I

3499
03:18:04.600 --> 03:18:06.760
<v Speaker 63>like whenever I was out there, I kind of got

3500
03:18:06.799 --> 03:18:07.799
<v Speaker 63>brought in back into.

3501
03:18:07.680 --> 03:18:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Christianity just from being interested in what Mormonism was.

3502
03:18:10.399 --> 03:18:12.920
<v Speaker 4>Okay, but Mormonism isn't Christianity. Do you understand that or

3503
03:18:12.920 --> 03:18:13.479
<v Speaker 4>do you think it is.

3504
03:18:15.520 --> 03:18:17.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that it's Christianity, knowing what I know now,

3505
03:18:18.200 --> 03:18:19.000
<v Speaker 2>but I used to think.

3506
03:18:19.079 --> 03:18:20.520
<v Speaker 63>I used to think it was, like you know, because

3507
03:18:20.520 --> 03:18:23.079
<v Speaker 63>they kind of tricked you almost they put like Jesus

3508
03:18:23.200 --> 03:18:25.040
<v Speaker 63>Christ on really big bold letters.

3509
03:18:26.319 --> 03:18:28.639
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean that just shows that the terminology is

3510
03:18:28.719 --> 03:18:30.639
<v Speaker 4>what is not what mattered to what it means.

3511
03:18:32.879 --> 03:18:35.559
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's true. What do you think about. But what

3512
03:18:35.639 --> 03:18:38.040
<v Speaker 2>do you think about Joseph Smith and what he saw?

3513
03:18:39.479 --> 03:18:42.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think Joe Smith was a notorious con man.

3514
03:18:42.079 --> 03:18:42.520
<v Speaker 4>What do you mean?

3515
03:18:44.120 --> 03:18:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I got you.

3516
03:18:47.239 --> 03:18:50.719
<v Speaker 4>I mean he obviously cribbed all of the temple rituals

3517
03:18:50.719 --> 03:18:57.959
<v Speaker 4>from Freemasonry. Yeah, what do you What do you mean? Yeah,

3518
03:18:58.239 --> 03:19:02.159
<v Speaker 4>you didn't know that. I'm not being I'm not being

3519
03:19:02.200 --> 03:19:04.760
<v Speaker 4>a bothole. I'm saying like, had you not heard that before?

3520
03:19:05.399 --> 03:19:06.239
<v Speaker 2>I've heard that before.

3521
03:19:06.719 --> 03:19:08.319
<v Speaker 4>Do you think it's true or you haven't looked into it?

3522
03:19:09.639 --> 03:19:12.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a Mormon. No, I don't believe that. I'm sorry,

3523
03:19:12.280 --> 03:19:16.840
<v Speaker 2>I know that that. Yeah, I agree with you, bro.

3524
03:19:18.000 --> 03:19:21.959
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So I mean if he's cribbing the temple rituals

3525
03:19:22.000 --> 03:19:24.639
<v Speaker 4>from Freemasonry, I mean that's kind of from the outset,

3526
03:19:24.760 --> 03:19:27.959
<v Speaker 4>tells me that this is like not a legitimate religion.

3527
03:19:29.760 --> 03:19:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah exactly. But what do you think about all the

3528
03:19:31.879 --> 03:19:34.559
<v Speaker 2>prophets that came afterwards? I claimed to have visions from God?

3529
03:19:35.559 --> 03:19:38.120
<v Speaker 4>Are you trolling? I mean, how would that prove? Why

3530
03:19:38.159 --> 03:19:39.559
<v Speaker 4>would that prove Moism?

3531
03:19:39.680 --> 03:19:42.319
<v Speaker 2>No? No, Jay, am I bad. I'm not trying to troll.

3532
03:19:42.360 --> 03:19:44.719
<v Speaker 63>I'm just bringing up point of views that Mormon people

3533
03:19:44.799 --> 03:19:46.079
<v Speaker 63>bring up to me, and I just want to hear

3534
03:19:46.159 --> 03:19:47.040
<v Speaker 63>what you have to say about that.

3535
03:19:47.840 --> 03:19:50.799
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, I mean, there's a million conment in

3536
03:19:50.840 --> 03:19:52.559
<v Speaker 4>the world that claim to have visions from God. So

3537
03:19:52.920 --> 03:19:54.200
<v Speaker 4>how would that prove Mormonism?

3538
03:19:56.600 --> 03:19:58.719
<v Speaker 2>I gotcha, And you just got to practice discern man.

3539
03:19:58.840 --> 03:20:01.559
<v Speaker 4>I guess well, I mean, I think there's going to

3540
03:20:01.600 --> 03:20:05.040
<v Speaker 4>be obvious indicators and that it's not true. One of

3541
03:20:05.079 --> 03:20:07.239
<v Speaker 4>those would be Well, let's just go with the simple

3542
03:20:07.879 --> 03:20:12.159
<v Speaker 4>biblical argument, like there are no profits, as we argued

3543
03:20:12.200 --> 03:20:14.920
<v Speaker 4>to the Mormon earlier on. And if that's the case,

3544
03:20:15.000 --> 03:20:18.760
<v Speaker 4>as we saw Luke sixteen sixteen, the prophets were until

3545
03:20:18.879 --> 03:20:23.000
<v Speaker 4>John Oh, then there's no office of Old Testament prophet anymore,

3546
03:20:23.879 --> 03:20:25.799
<v Speaker 4>as Hebrews one says, he has spoken to us in

3547
03:20:25.879 --> 03:20:29.120
<v Speaker 4>these last days by his son. Formerly he spoke to

3548
03:20:29.200 --> 03:20:33.120
<v Speaker 4>us through the prophets again Hebrews one, Luke sixteen sixteen,

3549
03:20:33.360 --> 03:20:35.600
<v Speaker 4>there's no new prophets. The faith was once for all

3550
03:20:35.639 --> 03:20:39.239
<v Speaker 4>delivered to the saints Jude three Epicurus. So we had

3551
03:20:39.239 --> 03:20:58.559
<v Speaker 4>an ancient philosopher joining us. What's up, Epicurus? Nope, yeah, yeah,

3552
03:21:00.079 --> 03:21:09.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm mute. Hello Hello, yes, sir, hello hello Hello, No

3553
03:21:17.760 --> 03:21:21.719
<v Speaker 4>sound bro you can't hear me. So again, Beloved, while

3554
03:21:21.719 --> 03:21:23.559
<v Speaker 4>I was with you, our found it necessary to write,

3555
03:21:23.600 --> 03:21:26.280
<v Speaker 4>very deligent, to write you concerning our commonsalvation, necessary to

3556
03:21:26.440 --> 03:21:29.479
<v Speaker 4>write to you exhorting you to content our honesty for

3557
03:21:29.520 --> 03:21:32.000
<v Speaker 4>the faith. Once were all delivered to the Saints, not

3558
03:21:32.120 --> 03:21:34.360
<v Speaker 4>once we're all delivered to the Latter day Saints. Once

3559
03:21:34.399 --> 03:21:37.000
<v Speaker 4>we're all delivered to the Saints. So if it was

3560
03:21:37.040 --> 03:21:39.120
<v Speaker 4>once we're all delivered at this time in the days

3561
03:21:39.120 --> 03:21:43.200
<v Speaker 4>of the Apostles, then it's not an ongoing thing. Once

3562
03:21:43.239 --> 03:21:46.280
<v Speaker 4>for all, there's no new faiths, there's no new profits.

3563
03:21:46.920 --> 03:21:48.879
<v Speaker 4>The law and the profits were until John and you

3564
03:21:49.000 --> 03:21:51.479
<v Speaker 4>heard the Mormon have the melt down. When we actually

3565
03:21:51.559 --> 03:21:52.600
<v Speaker 4>went to that text.

3566
03:21:52.719 --> 03:21:54.920
<v Speaker 6>You're making that up. There is no text.

3567
03:21:55.399 --> 03:21:56.200
<v Speaker 4>You're making that up.

3568
03:21:56.239 --> 03:21:56.920
<v Speaker 8>It does not say that.

3569
03:21:57.200 --> 03:21:59.200
<v Speaker 4>And then when we read it, you were added to

3570
03:21:59.319 --> 03:22:02.440
<v Speaker 4>the text. When I literally just read the text.

3571
03:22:04.959 --> 03:22:18.200
<v Speaker 15>Gabriel, Gabriel Gabriel, h uh huh, question.

3572
03:22:18.639 --> 03:22:23.159
<v Speaker 2>Uh of a Catholic theology.

3573
03:22:24.600 --> 03:22:30.159
<v Speaker 64>So okay, the Catholics, I believe, when it comes to

3574
03:22:30.280 --> 03:22:37.280
<v Speaker 64>the nature of God, they see, they deny, they deny.

3575
03:22:37.239 --> 03:22:44.280
<v Speaker 2>The essence uh energy, essence distinction. Okay, So when it

3576
03:22:44.319 --> 03:22:45.280
<v Speaker 2>comes to the Eucharist.

3577
03:22:45.440 --> 03:22:52.879
<v Speaker 64>Therefore, if they think, when it comes to transubstantiation that

3578
03:22:53.959 --> 03:22:57.120
<v Speaker 64>that is God in his absolute essence, that all.

3579
03:22:57.000 --> 03:22:57.559
<v Speaker 2>Bows my mind.

3580
03:22:57.600 --> 03:22:59.120
<v Speaker 64>How do I respond to this, because to me, that

3581
03:22:59.399 --> 03:23:02.360
<v Speaker 64>would be the equivalent of saying that God as he

3582
03:23:02.559 --> 03:23:04.760
<v Speaker 64>is and his absoluteness outside of Kevin's basement.

3583
03:23:05.719 --> 03:23:08.559
<v Speaker 4>I know they they do not say that it's the essence.

3584
03:23:08.639 --> 03:23:11.280
<v Speaker 4>They don't know what it is. And they'll say, uh,

3585
03:23:11.479 --> 03:23:13.959
<v Speaker 4>it's a well I take that back. They will agree

3586
03:23:13.959 --> 03:23:16.040
<v Speaker 4>with us that nobody knows what God's essence is and

3587
03:23:16.159 --> 03:23:18.920
<v Speaker 4>that we don't eat that. But then they say it

3588
03:23:19.040 --> 03:23:21.840
<v Speaker 4>is a created grace that you're partaking of, So you're

3589
03:23:21.840 --> 03:23:27.120
<v Speaker 4>eating a creature. So which is a contradiction because God

3590
03:23:27.239 --> 03:23:29.799
<v Speaker 4>isn't a creature. There's no uncreated God. I mean, there's

3591
03:23:29.840 --> 03:23:31.000
<v Speaker 4>no created God.

3592
03:23:33.120 --> 03:23:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

3593
03:23:34.200 --> 03:23:38.239
<v Speaker 64>Have you ever read the Catholic dogmatic theology of a

3594
03:23:38.399 --> 03:23:43.360
<v Speaker 64>Joseph Pole or try to pronounce I have not. Oh, okay,

3595
03:23:44.120 --> 03:23:46.680
<v Speaker 64>he's one of the only kind, like theoligin of seen.

3596
03:23:46.879 --> 03:23:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Have the book on the Attributes of God. Now when

3597
03:23:49.239 --> 03:23:51.079
<v Speaker 2>it goes to say it and I don't put it

3598
03:23:51.159 --> 03:23:52.840
<v Speaker 2>with me, actually have it in my kindle. I can

3599
03:23:52.879 --> 03:23:53.280
<v Speaker 2>look it up.

3600
03:23:53.360 --> 03:23:57.600
<v Speaker 64>But it's Uh, this is the point that confuses me

3601
03:23:57.840 --> 03:24:03.040
<v Speaker 64>because okay, so they for them to deny essence, energy's

3602
03:24:03.120 --> 03:24:07.360
<v Speaker 64>distinction and for the creative grace, I just I don't

3603
03:24:07.440 --> 03:24:09.879
<v Speaker 64>understand this creative grace stuff because I can't in them.

3604
03:24:10.440 --> 03:24:14.280
<v Speaker 4>It's because they have a presupposition about divine simplicity and

3605
03:24:14.600 --> 03:24:18.680
<v Speaker 4>they can't admit that you're partaking of an energy. So

3606
03:24:19.239 --> 03:24:21.159
<v Speaker 4>and it's not the essence, so it has to be

3607
03:24:21.319 --> 03:24:23.879
<v Speaker 4>a created grace. And Aught says that dogmatically.

3608
03:24:26.159 --> 03:24:28.680
<v Speaker 64>Okay, so that Lily, God would be the guy to

3609
03:24:28.799 --> 03:24:31.040
<v Speaker 64>see how they define created goods.

3610
03:24:31.760 --> 03:24:34.159
<v Speaker 4>Yes, it's a created substance. It's going to be created

3611
03:24:34.239 --> 03:24:37.840
<v Speaker 4>accident in the soul. And by extension, the Council of

3612
03:24:37.879 --> 03:24:41.680
<v Speaker 4>Trent says that what you are given in baptism is

3613
03:24:41.760 --> 03:24:44.799
<v Speaker 4>the righteousness, not that God has, but that He makes

3614
03:24:44.879 --> 03:24:49.159
<v Speaker 4>you righteous with which is a creature. So God is

3615
03:24:49.319 --> 03:24:54.040
<v Speaker 4>creating a supernatural accident in the soul. That's the grace

3616
03:24:54.120 --> 03:24:57.120
<v Speaker 4>that you get. And presumably the uchris would be the

3617
03:24:57.159 --> 03:25:01.399
<v Speaker 4>same thing. That's dogmatic that's in Aught gives you about

3618
03:25:01.440 --> 03:25:03.360
<v Speaker 4>five propositions as to what grace.

3619
03:25:03.239 --> 03:25:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Is, and the term accident is an Aristotelian.

3620
03:25:09.280 --> 03:25:13.520
<v Speaker 4>Right, but it's specified in Aught. He gives multiple propositions.

3621
03:25:14.000 --> 03:25:16.280
<v Speaker 4>One of the propositions is that it is not God,

3622
03:25:16.520 --> 03:25:19.760
<v Speaker 4>it is not his uncreated life. It is a created

3623
03:25:20.680 --> 03:25:26.000
<v Speaker 4>thing in the soul, an accident in the soul. Okay,

3624
03:25:27.079 --> 03:25:29.239
<v Speaker 4>so this is how silly. Their position is correct?

3625
03:25:30.680 --> 03:25:30.840
<v Speaker 16>Right?

3626
03:25:31.680 --> 03:25:35.959
<v Speaker 64>So, and the major contention would be that by believing this,

3627
03:25:36.680 --> 03:25:40.079
<v Speaker 64>this interrupts a life of giosis.

3628
03:25:40.680 --> 03:25:45.479
<v Speaker 4>Well it's not theosis, yeah, it's it's another creature, Kalama says.

3629
03:25:45.600 --> 03:25:48.559
<v Speaker 4>And when he's debating about this very point, he says,

3630
03:25:48.600 --> 03:25:51.120
<v Speaker 4>how can another If arianism is wrong because a creature

3631
03:25:51.159 --> 03:25:53.879
<v Speaker 4>can't save you, then created grace is wrong because it's

3632
03:25:53.920 --> 03:25:58.079
<v Speaker 4>just another creature trying to save you. Please make us humble, Bro,

3633
03:25:58.440 --> 03:26:10.200
<v Speaker 4>you're back. You have to mute. Why do you keep

3634
03:26:10.280 --> 03:26:11.879
<v Speaker 4>coming back? If you just want to talk about how

3635
03:26:12.239 --> 03:26:12.799
<v Speaker 4>humble you are?

3636
03:26:14.719 --> 03:26:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Don't make stuff up.

3637
03:26:16.799 --> 03:26:19.079
<v Speaker 4>I have a question, though, how am I making stuff up?

3638
03:26:21.799 --> 03:26:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Did you say how holy?

3639
03:26:22.959 --> 03:26:26.879
<v Speaker 4>I was humble? What humble?

3640
03:26:27.879 --> 03:26:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh? You said holy? No?

3641
03:26:29.200 --> 03:26:33.000
<v Speaker 9>But I have an honest question, and I'm asking, well,

3642
03:26:33.239 --> 03:26:35.959
<v Speaker 9>well before that, I got a two questions, but let

3643
03:26:36.000 --> 03:26:36.479
<v Speaker 9>me just ask this.

3644
03:26:36.600 --> 03:26:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Other one is what's the difference between.

3645
03:26:40.920 --> 03:26:43.280
<v Speaker 41>Prophesizing and being a prophet.

3646
03:26:44.079 --> 03:26:51.479
<v Speaker 4>Well, prophesizing isn't a word, so that's one difference, okay.

3647
03:26:54.079 --> 03:27:01.840
<v Speaker 2>And then also what exactly do you expect the debate

3648
03:27:02.399 --> 03:27:03.000
<v Speaker 2>to be about?

3649
03:27:04.000 --> 03:27:06.079
<v Speaker 4>They can be about any of the topics listed in

3650
03:27:06.200 --> 03:27:08.719
<v Speaker 4>giant bold print in front of your eyes.

3651
03:27:11.520 --> 03:27:18.319
<v Speaker 2>So, like, can you give some examples of debates.

3652
03:27:19.719 --> 03:27:26.000
<v Speaker 4>Any topic relating to Islam, Atheism, rom Catholicism, Protestantism, gnostic, Mormon,

3653
03:27:26.120 --> 03:27:29.600
<v Speaker 4>Toe's witness, literally the things listed in giant bold in

3654
03:27:29.639 --> 03:27:30.239
<v Speaker 4>front of your eyes.

3655
03:27:31.040 --> 03:27:34.760
<v Speaker 65>It's just funny because it sends all that versus you correct,

3656
03:27:37.399 --> 03:27:39.719
<v Speaker 65>like like you're holier than thou.

3657
03:27:40.319 --> 03:27:42.440
<v Speaker 2>It's just it's a funny title.

3658
03:27:42.959 --> 03:27:45.319
<v Speaker 4>Why would that make me holier than now? Because I'm

3659
03:27:45.360 --> 03:27:48.159
<v Speaker 4>doing debates? Earlier? You said debates make you arrogant, So

3660
03:27:49.120 --> 03:27:50.639
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't it make me more arrogant than them?

3661
03:27:52.360 --> 03:27:55.799
<v Speaker 2>Said that said it was the tone, and I used

3662
03:27:55.799 --> 03:27:56.760
<v Speaker 2>the word pride.

3663
03:27:56.479 --> 03:27:59.920
<v Speaker 4>Not arrogant, So tell me the difference between pride and air.

3664
03:28:03.079 --> 03:28:07.000
<v Speaker 2>I think arrogance is more of a modern word. So okay,

3665
03:28:07.239 --> 03:28:09.639
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, they're very similar, but I don't know if

3666
03:28:09.680 --> 03:28:10.440
<v Speaker 2>they'd be exact.

3667
03:28:11.200 --> 03:28:16.399
<v Speaker 4>So, so prophesizing is prophesizing, Well, you're a linguistic scholar.

3668
03:28:16.479 --> 03:28:18.479
<v Speaker 4>You should have known prophesizing asn't a word.

3669
03:28:20.959 --> 03:28:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Why are you being sarcastic because.

3670
03:28:23.079 --> 03:28:25.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm always sarcastic as part of the stick.

3671
03:28:26.760 --> 03:28:26.799
<v Speaker 10>A.

3672
03:28:29.479 --> 03:28:32.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you never heard of this. You're the linguistic scholar.

3673
03:28:32.959 --> 03:28:35.040
<v Speaker 4>You're gonna tell me the origin of pride and arrogance?

3674
03:28:35.520 --> 03:28:36.639
<v Speaker 4>You don't know the word stick is.

3675
03:28:37.840 --> 03:28:40.319
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't mean I'm a linguistic scholar.

3676
03:28:40.520 --> 03:28:42.799
<v Speaker 4>No, you said that the word arrogance is a more

3677
03:28:43.079 --> 03:28:45.360
<v Speaker 4>modern term versus pride, and I mean.

3678
03:28:46.239 --> 03:28:49.399
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm I am one to admit my ignorance.

3679
03:28:50.239 --> 03:28:52.479
<v Speaker 4>Well, it sounds like this sounds like virtues, like you're

3680
03:28:52.520 --> 03:28:55.079
<v Speaker 4>piety signaling. So you originally came here to talk.

3681
03:28:54.920 --> 03:28:58.639
<v Speaker 2>About how what you're talking about.

3682
03:28:59.600 --> 03:29:02.319
<v Speaker 4>But no, the first thing you said, Boomer, was that

3683
03:29:02.600 --> 03:29:04.360
<v Speaker 4>I was prideful and you were humble.

3684
03:29:06.079 --> 03:29:08.440
<v Speaker 2>I never said that. But let's just get off that

3685
03:29:08.600 --> 03:29:09.159
<v Speaker 2>for a second.

3686
03:29:09.200 --> 03:29:15.000
<v Speaker 41>But no, it's more seriously about the whole profit prophesizing.

3687
03:29:15.360 --> 03:29:16.159
<v Speaker 4>Word that's something.

3688
03:29:16.520 --> 03:29:17.120
<v Speaker 15>Okay, so.

3689
03:29:18.680 --> 03:29:21.280
<v Speaker 4>It's called it's not prophesiesing.

3690
03:29:21.840 --> 03:29:27.040
<v Speaker 9>Okay, well you know, okay, Well what's the difference not

3691
03:29:27.840 --> 03:29:36.639
<v Speaker 9>a word? Well, the word that you said, yeah, yeah,

3692
03:29:36.719 --> 03:29:38.399
<v Speaker 9>Well I'm just being honest.

3693
03:29:38.200 --> 03:29:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Like I don't know.

3694
03:29:39.079 --> 03:29:43.479
<v Speaker 4>That's okay, that's fine, go ahead, go ahead.

3695
03:29:45.920 --> 03:29:48.879
<v Speaker 2>I said, yeah, what's the difference.

3696
03:29:49.360 --> 03:29:51.959
<v Speaker 4>Between the office of a prophet in the Old Testament

3697
03:29:52.040 --> 03:29:54.680
<v Speaker 4>sense of like giving new divine revelations or somebody who

3698
03:29:54.760 --> 03:29:58.600
<v Speaker 4>speaks like as a preacher preaching against the generation's evil

3699
03:29:58.680 --> 03:30:00.399
<v Speaker 4>or something like that. I mean, what I I'm saying

3700
03:30:00.520 --> 03:30:03.959
<v Speaker 4>is that in the context of earlier in the debate tonight,

3701
03:30:04.040 --> 03:30:05.920
<v Speaker 4>before you got here, we had a Mormon who was

3702
03:30:06.000 --> 03:30:08.440
<v Speaker 4>saying that Joseph Smith is a new prophet, so he

3703
03:30:08.520 --> 03:30:11.639
<v Speaker 4>gave new revelations. And one of the easy ways to

3704
03:30:11.840 --> 03:30:14.280
<v Speaker 4>just cut that off right away is to say, no,

3705
03:30:14.559 --> 03:30:18.079
<v Speaker 4>the New Testament teaches that when the Messiah comes, there

3706
03:30:18.159 --> 03:30:21.280
<v Speaker 4>is an end to the Old Testament office of a prophet,

3707
03:30:21.360 --> 03:30:24.959
<v Speaker 4>and that's why Jesus says that John was the last

3708
03:30:25.000 --> 03:30:25.559
<v Speaker 4>of the prophets.

3709
03:30:26.680 --> 03:30:28.200
<v Speaker 2>But it's still possible to.

3710
03:30:30.600 --> 03:30:32.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, not in the sense, not in the sense of

3711
03:30:32.360 --> 03:30:36.920
<v Speaker 4>there being new divine public revelations. So the when Paul

3712
03:30:36.959 --> 03:30:39.680
<v Speaker 4>says in Galatians one that there's no new Gospel and

3713
03:30:39.719 --> 03:30:41.280
<v Speaker 4>no new revelations, it's it's finished.

3714
03:30:43.520 --> 03:30:47.120
<v Speaker 65>But as far as any type of like prediction, it's

3715
03:30:47.159 --> 03:30:50.680
<v Speaker 65>all like like nostradamins for example, that's all.

3716
03:30:50.840 --> 03:30:54.719
<v Speaker 4>That's all just fake yes, fake endgay, fake endgay.

3717
03:30:55.559 --> 03:30:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right.

3718
03:30:57.520 --> 03:31:00.319
<v Speaker 65>I just I just wanted to hear it spoken words.

3719
03:31:00.399 --> 03:31:02.799
<v Speaker 65>I mean, and that's what I figured in my mind.

3720
03:31:03.079 --> 03:31:04.479
<v Speaker 65>I just wanted to hear someone.

3721
03:31:04.319 --> 03:31:06.840
<v Speaker 4>Else say it. So thanks, Yeah, I agree with you.

3722
03:31:11.920 --> 03:31:16.520
<v Speaker 4>It's open for him to debate tonight if you disagree. Sam,

3723
03:31:16.600 --> 03:31:18.520
<v Speaker 4>what's up? I thought this Roe mcllay did was going

3724
03:31:18.559 --> 03:31:20.239
<v Speaker 4>to come. He's like a journalist or something. Where's he

3725
03:31:20.520 --> 03:31:23.559
<v Speaker 4>Let's see. I guess he's not gonna come.

3726
03:31:28.760 --> 03:31:29.120
<v Speaker 2>What's up?

3727
03:31:29.200 --> 03:31:29.440
<v Speaker 4>Sam?

3728
03:31:30.559 --> 03:31:31.040
<v Speaker 2>How's it going?

3729
03:31:31.200 --> 03:31:31.360
<v Speaker 45>Jay?

3730
03:31:31.559 --> 03:31:35.440
<v Speaker 22>A big fan recently got into your stuff from the

3731
03:31:36.559 --> 03:31:38.239
<v Speaker 22>the debate you had with the Fresh and Fit.

3732
03:31:39.360 --> 03:31:41.040
<v Speaker 2>I just wanted to ask a question.

3733
03:31:42.760 --> 03:31:47.799
<v Speaker 22>Let's say someone's getting new into Islamic apologics apologetics. What

3734
03:31:47.959 --> 03:31:51.680
<v Speaker 22>are some books they recommend or some videos they recommend

3735
03:31:52.600 --> 03:31:53.799
<v Speaker 22>for someone looking.

3736
03:31:53.600 --> 03:31:57.680
<v Speaker 4>Into the topic become Orthodox. Don't worry about trying to

3737
03:31:57.760 --> 03:32:00.719
<v Speaker 4>become an anti Islamic apologist, because there's no point in

3738
03:32:00.799 --> 03:32:02.879
<v Speaker 4>doing apologetics if you're not going to be in the

3739
03:32:03.000 --> 03:32:09.319
<v Speaker 4>Orthodox Church. Okay, I mean, I'm not trying. I'm not

3740
03:32:09.360 --> 03:32:12.479
<v Speaker 4>trying to be rude. I'm just being straight up, being honest. Zachariah,

3741
03:32:12.520 --> 03:32:14.879
<v Speaker 4>what's up? A good question, man, I appreciate it. Welcome,

3742
03:32:14.959 --> 03:32:21.559
<v Speaker 4>glad to have you over here. David says, for five dollars,

3743
03:32:21.680 --> 03:32:25.079
<v Speaker 4>praise to Yakub he has created us. Wait a minute,

3744
03:32:25.079 --> 03:32:28.159
<v Speaker 4>I thought Yakub created us to be with the devils,

3745
03:32:28.200 --> 03:32:30.479
<v Speaker 4>aren't we? So I'm not going to praise Yakub for

3746
03:32:30.559 --> 03:32:32.680
<v Speaker 4>making me a double So I don't know about that, David,

3747
03:32:33.120 --> 03:32:35.159
<v Speaker 4>Jake Burne, it's one dollar? Are we only saying the

3748
03:32:35.200 --> 03:32:38.760
<v Speaker 4>Lord's prayer? Because to pray like this is to not

3749
03:32:39.280 --> 03:32:43.360
<v Speaker 4>go babbling like pagans When I pray my morning prayer

3750
03:32:43.440 --> 03:32:48.440
<v Speaker 4>it seems like babbling. Well, Jesus himself did wrote prayers,

3751
03:32:48.719 --> 03:32:51.840
<v Speaker 4>so you know, praying the psalms is not babbling. Or

3752
03:32:52.079 --> 03:32:54.239
<v Speaker 4>or just because the prayers are wrote prayers, does it

3753
03:32:54.360 --> 03:32:57.280
<v Speaker 4>make them babbling? He says, vain repetition, so it's not

3754
03:32:57.360 --> 03:32:59.719
<v Speaker 4>inherently run to have repetition. Zacharie, what's up.

3755
03:33:00.879 --> 03:33:03.479
<v Speaker 2>Hey, j I kind of had a question.

3756
03:33:04.159 --> 03:33:07.879
<v Speaker 56>I don't know if this is like on topic per se,

3757
03:33:10.000 --> 03:33:13.360
<v Speaker 56>but I have a friend who pro proposed the idea

3758
03:33:13.479 --> 03:33:18.920
<v Speaker 56>that Satan is a relatively new Judeo Christian philosophy that

3759
03:33:19.120 --> 03:33:23.360
<v Speaker 56>came from when I came from Babylon, when the Jews

3760
03:33:23.479 --> 03:33:24.879
<v Speaker 56>were free from captivity.

3761
03:33:25.000 --> 03:33:26.520
<v Speaker 2>So I don't I don't know.

3762
03:33:26.639 --> 03:33:28.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Satan, Satan is in Satan is in the

3763
03:33:28.680 --> 03:33:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Book of Genesis, so that precedes Babylonian captivity. So how

3764
03:33:31.520 --> 03:33:33.600
<v Speaker 4>would he be a philosophy that's Babylonian.

3765
03:33:34.879 --> 03:33:37.079
<v Speaker 56>Yeah, I mean that, that's what I said, and I

3766
03:33:37.239 --> 03:33:39.799
<v Speaker 56>just didn't know if that was what you would say.

3767
03:33:39.840 --> 03:33:42.280
<v Speaker 4>Also, No, I think that, Yeah, I mean, I mean,

3768
03:33:42.319 --> 03:33:45.920
<v Speaker 4>there's not just Genesis. There's other texts that mentioned Satan

3769
03:33:46.200 --> 03:33:50.479
<v Speaker 4>prior to the Babylonian captivity. But usually when people say this,

3770
03:33:50.600 --> 03:33:54.000
<v Speaker 4>they're just repeating what some liberal scholars said. So I

3771
03:33:54.040 --> 03:33:56.079
<v Speaker 4>don't even know if that's even in vogue amongst liberal

3772
03:33:56.120 --> 03:33:59.440
<v Speaker 4>scholars anymore. Maybe it is, I don't know, but yeah,

3773
03:33:59.440 --> 03:34:01.159
<v Speaker 4>I think you could look at just look up the

3774
03:34:01.280 --> 03:34:04.079
<v Speaker 4>references to Satan. Satan appears in the Book of Job

3775
03:34:04.239 --> 03:34:07.799
<v Speaker 4>so that's probabor to the Babylonian captivity. Uh, and Donnis,

3776
03:34:08.120 --> 03:34:11.319
<v Speaker 4>what's up man? We had a wild night tonight. Shout

3777
03:34:11.360 --> 03:34:13.719
<v Speaker 4>out to Tristana, shout out to Father Deacon, and I

3778
03:34:13.840 --> 03:34:16.520
<v Speaker 4>shout out to Rachel. Shout out to Donatas shout out

3779
03:34:16.520 --> 03:34:20.639
<v Speaker 4>to all you based homeboys and homegirls. In the chat,

3780
03:34:22.079 --> 03:34:25.559
<v Speaker 4>you guys missed some Mormon madness. So I think it's

3781
03:34:25.559 --> 03:34:27.719
<v Speaker 4>about the It's about the first Mormon that we've had

3782
03:34:27.760 --> 03:34:30.239
<v Speaker 4>to actually come debate. It was wild that guy was like,

3783
03:34:31.440 --> 03:34:36.399
<v Speaker 4>that was exciting, and it's interesting because I don't I

3784
03:34:36.440 --> 03:34:38.600
<v Speaker 4>don't remember there ever being a Mormon to come debate

3785
03:34:39.159 --> 03:34:43.719
<v Speaker 4>that I can recall. And Donnis, what's up? You have

3786
03:34:43.760 --> 03:34:44.360
<v Speaker 4>to unmute man?

3787
03:34:46.520 --> 03:34:51.479
<v Speaker 2>Hello? Hello, Yeah, okay. I had a question. I'm Greek Orthodox.

3788
03:34:52.799 --> 03:34:55.680
<v Speaker 45>I had a question on an objection about the Council

3789
03:34:55.719 --> 03:34:57.280
<v Speaker 45>of Trullough canon one oh one?

3790
03:34:59.719 --> 03:35:02.799
<v Speaker 4>Is is this the one about community in the hand?

3791
03:35:03.639 --> 03:35:03.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

3792
03:35:05.360 --> 03:35:07.319
<v Speaker 4>I mean I don't even understand why this isn't What

3793
03:35:07.479 --> 03:35:09.479
<v Speaker 4>is this supposed to be objection to? Because the Church

3794
03:35:09.520 --> 03:35:11.680
<v Speaker 4>can determine at different times, in different places how to

3795
03:35:11.719 --> 03:35:15.680
<v Speaker 4>apply the canons. So didn't Luigi are responded to what

3796
03:35:15.799 --> 03:35:16.200
<v Speaker 4>he said?

3797
03:35:16.280 --> 03:35:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Right?

3798
03:35:18.079 --> 03:35:20.559
<v Speaker 4>Luigi? In his video he responded to Voice of Reason,

3799
03:35:20.600 --> 03:35:25.760
<v Speaker 4>if that's what you're referring to. Yeah, yeah, Luigi, I

3800
03:35:25.840 --> 03:35:28.200
<v Speaker 4>have it on my wall. Look at Luigi's response and

3801
03:35:28.280 --> 03:35:32.319
<v Speaker 4>he talks about I think Price's translation is the is

3802
03:35:32.520 --> 03:35:39.159
<v Speaker 4>Luigi's response, So, but good question. Mexican. Wait a minute,

3803
03:35:39.159 --> 03:35:41.959
<v Speaker 4>I'm double O seven. This is Mexican double O seven

3804
03:35:43.200 --> 03:35:46.399
<v Speaker 4>A bro about the I'm literally about to smoke you, Bro.

3805
03:35:46.799 --> 03:35:49.920
<v Speaker 4>I barely smoke you because I got like a license

3806
03:35:49.959 --> 03:35:57.319
<v Speaker 4>to kill or whatever? Barely bro? A do you barely?

3807
03:35:57.639 --> 03:35:59.159
<v Speaker 4>Do you barely got a license to kill?

3808
03:35:59.239 --> 03:35:59.639
<v Speaker 2>Bro or what?

3809
03:36:01.959 --> 03:36:02.000
<v Speaker 10>Not?

3810
03:36:02.239 --> 03:36:03.799
<v Speaker 2>Really just a fan.

3811
03:36:04.719 --> 03:36:09.440
<v Speaker 66>The question is I've been feeling a pool towards Orthodoxy.

3812
03:36:10.520 --> 03:36:15.479
<v Speaker 66>I've been with Catholics in the past. Franciscan has Benedictines Dominicans.

3813
03:36:16.920 --> 03:36:17.639
<v Speaker 15>They have like a.

3814
03:36:18.079 --> 03:36:22.239
<v Speaker 66>Day prayer, like the Liturgy of the Hours. I'm just

3815
03:36:22.399 --> 03:36:24.680
<v Speaker 66>wondering if being Orthodox.

3816
03:36:24.360 --> 03:36:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Is like the prayer, similar to.

3817
03:36:28.959 --> 03:36:31.959
<v Speaker 66>Like the prayer lifestyle, is it's similar to like the

3818
03:36:32.000 --> 03:36:33.120
<v Speaker 66>way your church practicing.

3819
03:36:33.440 --> 03:36:37.079
<v Speaker 4>There's some there's some similarity except and there's also some differences.

3820
03:36:37.239 --> 03:36:39.239
<v Speaker 4>So I remember the Liturgy of the Hours and all

3821
03:36:39.280 --> 03:36:40.680
<v Speaker 4>that when I was a Roman Catholic.

3822
03:36:40.479 --> 03:36:40.559
<v Speaker 10>And.

3823
03:36:42.319 --> 03:36:45.520
<v Speaker 4>I remember doing that. It's really going to depend on

3824
03:36:45.959 --> 03:36:48.280
<v Speaker 4>like where you're at in your Orthodox life with your

3825
03:36:48.280 --> 03:36:52.319
<v Speaker 4>spiritual Father, where he'll advise you on what kind of

3826
03:36:52.399 --> 03:36:56.479
<v Speaker 4>prayer role and so forth. But there are some similarities.

3827
03:36:56.600 --> 03:36:58.719
<v Speaker 4>But obviously it's not going to be the same types

3828
03:36:58.719 --> 03:37:03.680
<v Speaker 4>of Roman Catholic prayers. But good question. Retweet the goods.

3829
03:37:07.760 --> 03:37:13.879
<v Speaker 4>Retweet the goods. If you want to support the stream,

3830
03:37:13.920 --> 03:37:16.280
<v Speaker 4>you can do so via a stream lives. Also heading

3831
03:37:16.280 --> 03:37:20.520
<v Speaker 4>over to chalk dot com the best in supplementation. We

3832
03:37:20.680 --> 03:37:22.239
<v Speaker 4>love chalk dot com. Do you want to unmute? I

3833
03:37:22.280 --> 03:37:25.159
<v Speaker 4>can't read your Sanskrit or whatever your name is?

3834
03:37:27.520 --> 03:37:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Hey boy, did you hear me?

3835
03:37:29.440 --> 03:37:30.159
<v Speaker 4>Merely? What's up?

3836
03:37:31.479 --> 03:37:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I don't.

3837
03:37:33.399 --> 03:37:38.040
<v Speaker 67>I'm pretty sure you because I've seen you in No

3838
03:37:38.200 --> 03:37:43.879
<v Speaker 67>Kyle's videos. A. Yeah, I'm guessing at the g W

3839
03:37:44.120 --> 03:37:50.360
<v Speaker 67>people and Johoway's witnesses. Yeah, but you being like, do

3840
03:37:50.479 --> 03:37:52.159
<v Speaker 67>you like guys see the Bibles?

3841
03:37:52.440 --> 03:37:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Afrlone long? Do you guys?

3842
03:37:54.760 --> 03:37:57.079
<v Speaker 4>Is what I can't hear? You see the Bible as what?

3843
03:37:58.120 --> 03:38:01.079
<v Speaker 67>But do you guys believe in the Bible as like

3844
03:38:01.319 --> 03:38:03.200
<v Speaker 67>ultimate authority or do you guys.

3845
03:38:03.040 --> 03:38:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Kind of go with tradition on certain fans as well?

3846
03:38:06.680 --> 03:38:09.840
<v Speaker 4>They all work together, so the Bible or necessity tradition,

3847
03:38:10.000 --> 03:38:12.760
<v Speaker 4>and the Bible and tradition necessitated the bishops and the church,

3848
03:38:12.920 --> 03:38:14.840
<v Speaker 4>so they're all they all work together. There's not like

3849
03:38:15.319 --> 03:38:17.040
<v Speaker 4>one of those that's the authority.

3850
03:38:19.559 --> 03:38:22.079
<v Speaker 67>But like if someone in your church was teaching something

3851
03:38:22.159 --> 03:38:26.239
<v Speaker 67>that was like condemned, you, guys wouldn't actually listened to

3852
03:38:26.319 --> 03:38:28.600
<v Speaker 67>that personal right.

3853
03:38:28.559 --> 03:38:31.920
<v Speaker 4>So there would be multiple authorities that he's going against,

3854
03:38:32.200 --> 03:38:34.360
<v Speaker 4>namely the Bible and the tradition and the bishops.

3855
03:38:36.120 --> 03:38:38.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah, So that's where like you kind

3856
03:38:38.600 --> 03:38:47.799
<v Speaker 2>of disagree with the Catholics. Yeah, didn't you say that?

3857
03:38:48.159 --> 03:38:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Luigi responded to Voice to Reason? Are you going to

3858
03:38:50.639 --> 03:38:51.639
<v Speaker 2>debate Voice of Reason?

3859
03:38:53.360 --> 03:38:55.360
<v Speaker 4>I didn't make the video response to Voice to Reason.

3860
03:38:55.479 --> 03:38:59.360
<v Speaker 4>I DM voice. I DMed him and he ignored the

3861
03:38:59.680 --> 03:39:00.319
<v Speaker 4>DM so.

3862
03:39:02.799 --> 03:39:04.479
<v Speaker 67>Because I was just wondering if you were a debate

3863
03:39:04.639 --> 03:39:07.479
<v Speaker 67>because it kind of misrepresents people.

3864
03:39:08.799 --> 03:39:12.000
<v Speaker 4>I do agree with that, and he never responded to

3865
03:39:12.079 --> 03:39:13.799
<v Speaker 4>the d M. So I don't think he's interested in

3866
03:39:13.879 --> 03:39:19.040
<v Speaker 4>a debate with me. Oh that's an awsome question, bro, Yeah,

3867
03:39:19.399 --> 03:39:34.600
<v Speaker 4>good questions. Appreciate that. Rickle Pickle, Rickle Hello, yeap.

3868
03:39:36.239 --> 03:39:41.399
<v Speaker 2>Yo bro? Sorry Gay? Yeah, yeah, Hi Jay.

3869
03:39:41.799 --> 03:39:46.840
<v Speaker 68>I'm another nominational believer in private scriptural and I had

3870
03:39:46.840 --> 03:39:51.440
<v Speaker 68>a question about the biblical condens So from another nominational perspective,

3871
03:39:51.559 --> 03:39:54.879
<v Speaker 68>I believe in the sixty six books Candon I wanted

3872
03:39:54.920 --> 03:39:58.360
<v Speaker 68>to ask you a question as an eph believer, what's

3873
03:39:58.399 --> 03:40:00.799
<v Speaker 68>your like do you have any ment? Also look into

3874
03:40:01.239 --> 03:40:05.200
<v Speaker 68>concerning like canonization the earliest kind of the church, Like

3875
03:40:05.360 --> 03:40:06.799
<v Speaker 68>when was scripture colonized?

3876
03:40:06.799 --> 03:40:07.559
<v Speaker 2>How many books?

3877
03:40:07.680 --> 03:40:09.879
<v Speaker 4>Like what is the Yeah, it's not it's in the

3878
03:40:09.959 --> 03:40:13.760
<v Speaker 4>Orthodox view, it's canonized by Trollo really late. So that's

3879
03:40:13.840 --> 03:40:16.239
<v Speaker 4>the ecumenical council that lists the canon.

3880
03:40:17.319 --> 03:40:19.479
<v Speaker 68>Okay, so a late kind is where you get support

3881
03:40:19.520 --> 03:40:22.920
<v Speaker 68>instead of an earlier kind of correct, All right?

3882
03:40:23.000 --> 03:40:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Cool?

3883
03:40:23.239 --> 03:40:25.959
<v Speaker 68>So would that also include like traditions that came late

3884
03:40:26.159 --> 03:40:29.399
<v Speaker 68>or is that only like when the when that council

3885
03:40:29.479 --> 03:40:32.680
<v Speaker 68>took place, that's when all of the things that would turn.

3886
03:40:32.559 --> 03:40:35.280
<v Speaker 2>It departs were ratified. So like, does that include later

3887
03:40:35.399 --> 03:40:35.959
<v Speaker 2>works from.

3888
03:40:35.840 --> 03:40:39.000
<v Speaker 68>Like eight hundred and seven hundred or were these things

3889
03:40:39.079 --> 03:40:42.559
<v Speaker 68>done as writings that primarily came from the early church

3890
03:40:42.600 --> 03:40:43.360
<v Speaker 68>in the first country.

3891
03:40:43.959 --> 03:40:46.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, the canon, the canon would be the Bible. So

3892
03:40:47.079 --> 03:40:48.440
<v Speaker 4>what do I don't understand what you mean?

3893
03:40:49.079 --> 03:40:50.959
<v Speaker 2>Like how much how many books would be in that

3894
03:40:51.120 --> 03:40:52.319
<v Speaker 2>is what a masket like? Right?

3895
03:40:52.399 --> 03:40:55.959
<v Speaker 4>So the Orthodox Bible is kind of basically the canon

3896
03:40:56.159 --> 03:40:58.520
<v Speaker 4>that the Roman Calloic Church has because the Eastern Church

3897
03:40:58.559 --> 03:41:00.879
<v Speaker 4>and the Western Church had to do or canonical books.

3898
03:41:02.200 --> 03:41:06.079
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay, so basically the same ones. Do theyre aquicol?

3899
03:41:06.559 --> 03:41:08.639
<v Speaker 2>So do you have this seam the paper for writings

3900
03:41:08.680 --> 03:41:12.040
<v Speaker 2>as well? Like, okay, cool, all right, I'll take a

3901
03:41:12.079 --> 03:41:12.440
<v Speaker 2>look into that.

3902
03:41:12.719 --> 03:41:16.479
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm trying to think of I've done debates with

3903
03:41:16.559 --> 03:41:18.600
<v Speaker 4>Protestants on the canon. Look up the debate that we

3904
03:41:18.680 --> 03:41:23.120
<v Speaker 4>did with Dale the Protestant and then the debate I

3905
03:41:23.200 --> 03:41:26.479
<v Speaker 4>did with Pedro the Protestant. Those are debates where we

3906
03:41:26.600 --> 03:41:29.959
<v Speaker 4>talked about the canon. And I've done a lot of

3907
03:41:30.000 --> 03:41:31.879
<v Speaker 4>talks on the canon. I just can't think of specifically

3908
03:41:31.959 --> 03:41:37.040
<v Speaker 4>what they were. Were titled meme Rose, what's up?

3909
03:41:37.120 --> 03:41:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Dude?

3910
03:41:45.520 --> 03:41:49.639
<v Speaker 4>I think tonight might have been my largest numbers because

3911
03:41:49.680 --> 03:41:52.479
<v Speaker 4>but that was probably people being dumping their their chat

3912
03:41:52.559 --> 03:41:55.399
<v Speaker 4>into my chat. I think we hit seventeen Do we

3913
03:41:55.479 --> 03:41:57.159
<v Speaker 4>hit seventeen hundred tonight? Max?

3914
03:41:58.479 --> 03:42:02.760
<v Speaker 2>What's that? Man? Hey? Good hearing a cool question.

3915
03:42:02.879 --> 03:42:06.680
<v Speaker 30>So what are your views on the Virgin Mary like

3916
03:42:06.799 --> 03:42:09.040
<v Speaker 30>a she perpetually version?

3917
03:42:09.680 --> 03:42:09.879
<v Speaker 4>Yes?

3918
03:42:10.319 --> 03:42:16.559
<v Speaker 2>Or wait? What scripture? What scriptures show that.

3919
03:42:18.239 --> 03:42:21.000
<v Speaker 4>Zeko forty four that the Prince who is the Messiah

3920
03:42:21.159 --> 03:42:24.840
<v Speaker 4>exits the temple and the door remains shut and he

3921
03:42:25.120 --> 03:42:27.760
<v Speaker 4>miraculously goes through it and it never is opened.

3922
03:42:29.479 --> 03:42:38.159
<v Speaker 2>So when he knew or not, what does that mean, Joseph, Yeah, Matthew, and.

3923
03:42:38.200 --> 03:42:42.040
<v Speaker 4>That means what Jerome explains in his letter against Silvettius,

3924
03:42:42.120 --> 03:42:44.239
<v Speaker 4>that Jesus says, I'm with you till the end of

3925
03:42:44.280 --> 03:42:46.079
<v Speaker 4>the world. Does that mean he's not with us after that?

3926
03:42:48.680 --> 03:42:51.559
<v Speaker 2>No? No, No, to know someone like in the concept of.

3927
03:42:52.200 --> 03:42:54.760
<v Speaker 4>It says he knew or not till. And I'm saying

3928
03:42:54.799 --> 03:42:58.000
<v Speaker 4>the whole debate hinges on till doesn't necessitate that after

3929
03:42:58.200 --> 03:42:59.079
<v Speaker 4>till it happened.

3930
03:43:00.239 --> 03:43:04.639
<v Speaker 41>No, But what about judges Mans twenty five when they say,

3931
03:43:04.760 --> 03:43:06.639
<v Speaker 41>but the men were not markets.

3932
03:43:06.879 --> 03:43:09.040
<v Speaker 2>So the man said his conquentye and brought her fourth

3933
03:43:09.120 --> 03:43:09.680
<v Speaker 2>onto them.

3934
03:43:09.639 --> 03:43:12.440
<v Speaker 4>And they knew her because you not hear what The

3935
03:43:12.520 --> 03:43:15.360
<v Speaker 4>debate is not over whether it's the debate is over

3936
03:43:15.399 --> 03:43:16.319
<v Speaker 4>the word till in.

3937
03:43:16.719 --> 03:43:19.680
<v Speaker 2>That text, And I'm asking if I knew her, how

3938
03:43:19.719 --> 03:43:20.520
<v Speaker 2>does he know her?

3939
03:43:21.719 --> 03:43:23.879
<v Speaker 4>The text it says that he did not know her,

3940
03:43:24.120 --> 03:43:26.239
<v Speaker 4>and then it says till right.

3941
03:43:28.120 --> 03:43:28.600
<v Speaker 2>I knew her?

3942
03:43:28.760 --> 03:43:30.879
<v Speaker 4>Not right, And what's the rest of it?

3943
03:43:32.399 --> 03:43:33.719
<v Speaker 2>She had with her first one?

3944
03:43:33.799 --> 03:43:37.399
<v Speaker 4>So till so till does not necessitate that he did

3945
03:43:37.559 --> 03:43:42.239
<v Speaker 4>know her after That's what I've been saying. So so

3946
03:43:42.399 --> 03:43:44.959
<v Speaker 4>the same word till is used when Jesus says I'm

3947
03:43:45.000 --> 03:43:46.399
<v Speaker 4>with you till the end of the world. Does that

3948
03:43:46.520 --> 03:43:47.319
<v Speaker 4>mean he's not after?

3949
03:43:49.840 --> 03:43:51.760
<v Speaker 2>No, No, he was talking about he was talking to

3950
03:43:52.799 --> 03:43:54.399
<v Speaker 2>something else. But this is context.

3951
03:43:54.520 --> 03:43:57.120
<v Speaker 4>Do not understand what the point is, so you can't

3952
03:43:57.159 --> 03:43:57.959
<v Speaker 4>grasp the argument.

3953
03:43:58.760 --> 03:44:01.159
<v Speaker 2>I completely grasp to trust me, I do this all

3954
03:44:01.239 --> 03:44:01.959
<v Speaker 2>day with Catholics.

3955
03:44:03.399 --> 03:44:05.079
<v Speaker 4>Well then hold on. If you do this all day

3956
03:44:05.120 --> 03:44:06.799
<v Speaker 4>with Catholics, then you would have already heard this argument,

3957
03:44:06.840 --> 03:44:07.959
<v Speaker 4>would have known what tills about.

3958
03:44:08.120 --> 03:44:09.959
<v Speaker 2>I understand. I'm just trying to build in my argument.

3959
03:44:09.959 --> 03:44:12.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry, Well then hold on, then you don't know

3960
03:44:12.000 --> 03:44:12.920
<v Speaker 4>actually know this argument.

3961
03:44:13.879 --> 03:44:14.319
<v Speaker 2>Yes I do.

3962
03:44:14.520 --> 03:44:18.120
<v Speaker 18>I'm building my argument about her not being a virtual version.

3963
03:44:18.920 --> 03:44:22.840
<v Speaker 4>Well, how does the prince exit the door and it

3964
03:44:23.040 --> 03:44:24.120
<v Speaker 4>never is opened?

3965
03:44:26.520 --> 03:44:27.520
<v Speaker 2>That has nothing to do with merit?

3966
03:44:27.959 --> 03:44:30.159
<v Speaker 4>Well, how do you know that? What door does the Messiah?

3967
03:44:30.159 --> 03:44:30.840
<v Speaker 4>The prince exit?

3968
03:44:34.319 --> 03:44:35.639
<v Speaker 2>What door does the Messiah?

3969
03:44:36.360 --> 03:44:37.719
<v Speaker 4>What do you mean how do you know it doesn't

3970
03:44:37.719 --> 03:44:39.159
<v Speaker 4>have anything to do with Mary? You didn't even know

3971
03:44:39.200 --> 03:44:40.680
<v Speaker 4>what you don't know what verse on the target?

3972
03:44:41.799 --> 03:44:42.360
<v Speaker 2>What's the verse?

3973
03:44:42.399 --> 03:44:45.479
<v Speaker 4>Could I cited it at the very beginning. I read

3974
03:44:45.520 --> 03:44:48.559
<v Speaker 4>it to you, he said, Ezekiel right forty four. Correct

3975
03:44:49.239 --> 03:44:51.920
<v Speaker 4>the door that the Messiah exits that never opens.

3976
03:44:54.000 --> 03:44:57.440
<v Speaker 18>Ezekiel forty four the Messiah.

3977
03:44:57.680 --> 03:44:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Let me see, I'm trying to figure out because I

3978
03:44:59.319 --> 03:44:59.920
<v Speaker 2>can't find them.

3979
03:45:00.799 --> 03:45:02.760
<v Speaker 4>You can't find it, equal forty four. I thought you

3980
03:45:02.879 --> 03:45:04.959
<v Speaker 4>deal with this every day with Catholics.

3981
03:45:05.760 --> 03:45:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I never heard this from a Catholic right now?

3982
03:45:08.159 --> 03:45:10.559
<v Speaker 4>Well, okay, but did you hear the till argument or

3983
03:45:10.639 --> 03:45:11.639
<v Speaker 4>was that the first time you heard it?

3984
03:45:11.840 --> 03:45:12.040
<v Speaker 69>Yes?

3985
03:45:12.879 --> 03:45:13.959
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, it's still arguments.

3986
03:45:14.159 --> 03:45:19.000
<v Speaker 53>It's it all on void honestly, because the whole context.

3987
03:45:18.799 --> 03:45:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Is he knew her not so anyways.

3988
03:45:20.760 --> 03:45:23.360
<v Speaker 4>But but why did you stop there and not read

3989
03:45:23.399 --> 03:45:24.959
<v Speaker 4>the rest of the verse when I asked you? So

3990
03:45:25.239 --> 03:45:28.520
<v Speaker 4>you're just assuming your positions he knew her, not till. Oh,

3991
03:45:28.639 --> 03:45:30.959
<v Speaker 4>so it does say till, so you intentionally so this

3992
03:45:31.079 --> 03:45:36.000
<v Speaker 4>whole time you intentionally didn't say it. So you intentionally

3993
03:45:36.079 --> 03:45:37.920
<v Speaker 4>didn't say till when you knew it was there.

3994
03:45:39.000 --> 03:45:39.760
<v Speaker 2>But he knew her.

3995
03:45:39.879 --> 03:45:43.040
<v Speaker 4>After it doesn't say that. Okay, So why does he

3996
03:45:43.120 --> 03:45:48.079
<v Speaker 4>have kid what why brothers of the lord that brothers

3997
03:45:48.159 --> 03:45:50.280
<v Speaker 4>of the Lord can mean cousins. You know that since

3998
03:45:50.319 --> 03:45:52.200
<v Speaker 4>You've dealt with this all the time with Catholics.

3999
03:45:53.239 --> 03:45:55.120
<v Speaker 41>Yeah, I know, but it's funny that you guys keep

4000
03:45:55.159 --> 03:45:56.239
<v Speaker 41>switching what the Bible says.

4001
03:45:56.920 --> 03:45:59.319
<v Speaker 4>So all right, but the Bible doesn't tell you that.

4002
03:45:59.559 --> 03:46:01.600
<v Speaker 4>That's your interpretation of it, assuming your.

4003
03:46:01.520 --> 03:46:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Position, But it doesn't that.

4004
03:46:04.120 --> 03:46:09.600
<v Speaker 4>They doesn't say that. It doesn't say his his biological children.

4005
03:46:09.799 --> 03:46:10.719
<v Speaker 4>That's your interpretation.

4006
03:46:12.600 --> 03:46:14.280
<v Speaker 2>You mean you mean when he was going fast, they

4007
03:46:14.319 --> 03:46:15.000
<v Speaker 2>weren't his brethren.

4008
03:46:16.559 --> 03:46:19.479
<v Speaker 4>All of the Jews called themselves brethren. Jews called themselves

4009
03:46:19.520 --> 03:46:24.520
<v Speaker 4>brethren all the time. That doesn't prove your position. By

4010
03:46:24.559 --> 03:46:26.520
<v Speaker 4>the way, how do you even know what the Bible is?

4011
03:46:26.639 --> 03:46:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Like?

4012
03:46:26.719 --> 03:46:27.760
<v Speaker 4>How do you have the right Bible?

4013
03:46:29.239 --> 03:46:32.399
<v Speaker 2>Well? I know the King's Ampible is the most fruitful Bible.

4014
03:46:32.440 --> 03:46:34.159
<v Speaker 4>So that's the Wait, how do you know that's the

4015
03:46:34.239 --> 03:46:36.079
<v Speaker 4>right one because.

4016
03:46:35.840 --> 03:46:37.079
<v Speaker 2>That's the most fruitful and that's the.

4017
03:46:37.399 --> 03:46:39.360
<v Speaker 4>Most fruitful Bible. What does that even mean?

4018
03:46:40.639 --> 03:46:43.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm sure you know I shall know them by

4019
03:46:43.200 --> 03:46:43.879
<v Speaker 2>their fruits.

4020
03:46:43.680 --> 03:46:49.280
<v Speaker 4>Right, So the your subjective idea of what the fruits

4021
03:46:49.319 --> 03:46:51.159
<v Speaker 4>are is what tells you the right Bible, and it's

4022
03:46:51.159 --> 03:46:51.959
<v Speaker 4>the King James Bible.

4023
03:46:52.879 --> 03:46:54.239
<v Speaker 2>Do you know anything about King?

4024
03:46:55.040 --> 03:46:56.600
<v Speaker 4>I know all about the history of the church, and

4025
03:46:56.799 --> 03:46:57.520
<v Speaker 4>let's talk about it.

4026
03:47:00.120 --> 03:47:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Christians are the Church. You're not a Christian, you're an Orthodox.

4027
03:47:02.959 --> 03:47:06.200
<v Speaker 4>So please, okay, where where was your Where was your sect?

4028
03:47:06.319 --> 03:47:07.319
<v Speaker 4>Before the king James?

4029
03:47:09.239 --> 03:47:11.799
<v Speaker 2>My second started with Jesus?

4030
03:47:13.159 --> 03:47:15.399
<v Speaker 4>Okay, and who believed what you believe in the first,

4031
03:47:15.440 --> 03:47:16.280
<v Speaker 4>second or third century?

4032
03:47:16.319 --> 03:47:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Here's a lively Peter was a lively star.

4033
03:47:18.440 --> 03:47:19.959
<v Speaker 4>What are you even talking about? Who believed what you

4034
03:47:20.079 --> 03:47:22.319
<v Speaker 4>believe in the second or third century? Give one person,

4035
03:47:22.719 --> 03:47:23.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't.

4036
03:47:23.399 --> 03:47:25.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't I follow the vibe. I don't follow what

4037
03:47:25.319 --> 03:47:25.600
<v Speaker 2>men do.

4038
03:47:25.840 --> 03:47:29.000
<v Speaker 4>So so you didn't have any representative in those centuries.

4039
03:47:28.719 --> 03:47:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Right, well, representative, my representative.

4040
03:47:31.280 --> 03:47:34.120
<v Speaker 4>Jesus, pro well, Jesus said that the church. Jesus said

4041
03:47:34.159 --> 03:47:36.360
<v Speaker 4>the gate. Jesus said, the gates of Hell would not

4042
03:47:36.440 --> 03:47:38.479
<v Speaker 4>prevail against the church. And so you set the church

4043
03:47:38.559 --> 03:47:42.920
<v Speaker 4>up at his first advent? Where was your sect in

4044
03:47:43.040 --> 03:47:45.520
<v Speaker 4>those centuries since the gates of Hell didn't prevail against it?

4045
03:47:46.399 --> 03:47:49.600
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you when when he said and on this frock.

4046
03:47:50.879 --> 03:47:53.239
<v Speaker 4>Where was your sect in the second or third century?

4047
03:47:53.639 --> 03:47:55.799
<v Speaker 4>It was right there would I just you're that stupid.

4048
03:47:56.120 --> 03:47:58.040
<v Speaker 4>Your sect was in the second or third century when

4049
03:47:58.120 --> 03:47:59.559
<v Speaker 4>Jesus said that in the first century.

4050
03:48:00.239 --> 03:48:00.959
<v Speaker 2>I'm a boring again.

4051
03:48:01.719 --> 03:48:04.680
<v Speaker 4>Where was your sect in the second, third, fourth, fifth,

4052
03:48:04.680 --> 03:48:05.200
<v Speaker 4>sixth century?

4053
03:48:06.280 --> 03:48:06.920
<v Speaker 2>What sect?

4054
03:48:07.280 --> 03:48:07.920
<v Speaker 64>I don't follow?

4055
03:48:08.120 --> 03:48:11.200
<v Speaker 4>So you don't have any representatives? Do you even understand

4056
03:48:11.239 --> 03:48:14.319
<v Speaker 4>the arm Can you even understand? You don't understand the

4057
03:48:14.399 --> 03:48:15.079
<v Speaker 4>argument I'm making?

4058
03:48:15.200 --> 03:48:15.840
<v Speaker 69>You follow me?

4059
03:48:16.319 --> 03:48:17.600
<v Speaker 2>I follow what the Bible stays?

4060
03:48:19.120 --> 03:48:20.840
<v Speaker 4>Do you understand the argument I'm making?

4061
03:48:22.520 --> 03:48:23.079
<v Speaker 16>You understand that?

4062
03:48:23.879 --> 03:48:26.120
<v Speaker 4>So you can't restate my argument? You're incapable of it.

4063
03:48:28.520 --> 03:48:29.760
<v Speaker 4>You don't know what the word it is, so that

4064
03:48:29.879 --> 03:48:31.479
<v Speaker 4>you don't even know what the word incapable means. So

4065
03:48:31.600 --> 03:48:42.520
<v Speaker 4>this is a complete idiot, Matt. My new standard is

4066
03:48:42.559 --> 03:48:45.719
<v Speaker 4>that if a person is literally incapable of restating what

4067
03:48:46.079 --> 03:48:50.959
<v Speaker 4>argument I'm making, it's time to move on. Matt.

4068
03:48:54.479 --> 03:48:55.559
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Jay's going by.

4069
03:48:56.479 --> 03:48:56.879
<v Speaker 4>What's up?

4070
03:48:59.280 --> 03:48:59.479
<v Speaker 2>Hey?

4071
03:49:00.920 --> 03:49:02.959
<v Speaker 28>Uh, I guess I'm.

4072
03:49:04.360 --> 03:49:04.799
<v Speaker 2>About what.

4073
03:49:06.959 --> 03:49:07.600
<v Speaker 4>You're cutting out?

4074
03:49:07.639 --> 03:49:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Man?

4075
03:49:07.799 --> 03:49:08.079
<v Speaker 4>I can't.

4076
03:49:10.760 --> 03:49:17.360
<v Speaker 70>Oh, I'm sorry. Something better is still pretty bad. So

4077
03:49:17.440 --> 03:49:20.600
<v Speaker 70>I guess on that last topic about where our sect was,

4078
03:49:20.760 --> 03:49:25.159
<v Speaker 70>because I'd be considered a non nominational Christian. Also, I

4079
03:49:25.239 --> 03:49:29.680
<v Speaker 70>guess our argument would be is that I would say

4080
03:49:29.840 --> 03:49:35.959
<v Speaker 70>I don't think the Orthodox Church or the Catholic Church

4081
03:49:36.120 --> 03:49:40.479
<v Speaker 70>in hole, like just because you're a member of that church.

4082
03:49:40.799 --> 03:49:43.440
<v Speaker 70>That doesn't mean you were a guaranteed salvation or you're

4083
03:49:43.719 --> 03:49:44.399
<v Speaker 70>actually a.

4084
03:49:44.440 --> 03:49:47.600
<v Speaker 4>Follow absolutely nothing to do with answering the question at hand.

4085
03:49:47.799 --> 03:49:51.479
<v Speaker 70>So I mean so, so, I guess my My answer

4086
03:49:51.520 --> 03:49:53.760
<v Speaker 70>would be that the universal Church.

4087
03:49:53.879 --> 03:49:56.479
<v Speaker 4>The answer is that you guys are incapable of understanding

4088
03:49:56.520 --> 03:50:01.760
<v Speaker 4>the question. Can you restate what the argument is?

4089
03:50:06.280 --> 03:50:08.360
<v Speaker 2>I guess, I guess No, I guess I couldn't.

4090
03:50:09.159 --> 03:50:10.799
<v Speaker 4>So did Jesus set up a church?

4091
03:50:12.879 --> 03:50:13.440
<v Speaker 8>Yes, okay?

4092
03:50:14.159 --> 03:50:16.319
<v Speaker 4>Did he say that the gates of l would not

4093
03:50:16.440 --> 03:50:20.159
<v Speaker 4>prevail over the church that he's setting up, Yes, okay,

4094
03:50:20.520 --> 03:50:25.079
<v Speaker 4>But we're to believe that it's truly non denominational Christianity,

4095
03:50:25.120 --> 03:50:29.479
<v Speaker 4>which didn't exist for centuries until the present. What last

4096
03:50:29.600 --> 03:50:34.840
<v Speaker 4>sixty years? And so did the gates of l prevail

4097
03:50:34.920 --> 03:50:37.799
<v Speaker 4>against the church throughout those centuries?

4098
03:50:39.040 --> 03:50:39.079
<v Speaker 11>No?

4099
03:50:39.479 --> 03:50:40.280
<v Speaker 15>And how is that not?

4100
03:50:40.559 --> 03:50:42.840
<v Speaker 4>How is that the case when there were no non

4101
03:50:42.879 --> 03:50:44.920
<v Speaker 4>denominationals for that all that time period?

4102
03:50:46.239 --> 03:50:48.639
<v Speaker 70>I would say the entire time period, it would be

4103
03:50:48.719 --> 03:50:49.520
<v Speaker 70>non denominational.

4104
03:50:50.239 --> 03:50:52.159
<v Speaker 2>Just because you were titled.

4105
03:50:51.920 --> 03:50:55.520
<v Speaker 70>Under that church and you attended the church didn't mean

4106
03:50:55.559 --> 03:50:58.440
<v Speaker 70>you were part of christ church, would be my argument.

4107
03:50:59.079 --> 03:51:01.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean, are you still are you? Are you serious?

4108
03:51:02.000 --> 03:51:05.200
<v Speaker 4>Or are you trolling? I mean, I like so you

4109
03:51:05.360 --> 03:51:09.040
<v Speaker 4>think so so the people So, the people at the

4110
03:51:09.079 --> 03:51:12.280
<v Speaker 4>Council of Nicea were non denominational Christians, even though they

4111
03:51:12.360 --> 03:51:20.239
<v Speaker 4>call themselves Orthodox Catholics. Yeah, okay, okay, I mean I

4112
03:51:20.319 --> 03:51:22.959
<v Speaker 4>feel I feel you're a retard. This is that's so

4113
03:51:23.079 --> 03:51:24.600
<v Speaker 4>stupid it's not even worth replying to.

4114
03:51:25.959 --> 03:51:26.000
<v Speaker 16>So.

4115
03:51:29.639 --> 03:51:33.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Alfanatius had a strip mall, and uh, you know

4116
03:51:33.120 --> 03:51:35.239
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people felt like he was a bishop,

4117
03:51:35.799 --> 03:51:41.360
<v Speaker 4>but actually there was an ancient Alexandrian strip mall where

4118
03:51:41.399 --> 03:51:42.319
<v Speaker 4>he rented out.

4119
03:51:43.280 --> 03:51:43.399
<v Speaker 58>Uh.

4120
03:51:43.600 --> 03:51:46.760
<v Speaker 4>They didn't have uh, monster trucks back in those days

4121
03:51:46.799 --> 03:51:50.959
<v Speaker 4>like the non nominational churches today. They had horse truck

4122
03:51:51.200 --> 03:51:53.799
<v Speaker 4>rallies instead of monster truck rallies. And that's what the

4123
03:51:53.879 --> 03:52:00.840
<v Speaker 4>true Christians were up to. What's up, unmute, good evening, Jay?

4124
03:52:02.000 --> 03:52:06.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, can you hear me? Just fine? Yep? I have

4125
03:52:06.920 --> 03:52:09.159
<v Speaker 2>like a shower thought question if you have a second

4126
03:52:09.200 --> 03:52:09.360
<v Speaker 2>for that.

4127
03:52:09.600 --> 03:52:10.959
<v Speaker 4>This sounds gay? What do you want?

4128
03:52:12.680 --> 03:52:15.000
<v Speaker 2>What are your thoughts on? Like dinosaurs?

4129
03:52:16.879 --> 03:52:18.680
<v Speaker 4>Show that I don't want to hear nothing about you

4130
03:52:18.799 --> 03:52:23.120
<v Speaker 4>in the shower magnum. What's up that dude's got a

4131
03:52:23.159 --> 03:52:26.200
<v Speaker 4>crush on dinosaurs? He's in the in the shower fantasizing

4132
03:52:26.200 --> 03:52:28.079
<v Speaker 4>about dinosaurs and m's come talk to me about that.

4133
03:52:29.520 --> 03:52:35.520
<v Speaker 4>What's up, man, I'm mute. T rexes t Rex is gay.

4134
03:52:35.559 --> 03:52:37.159
<v Speaker 4>If you notice, t Rex is always holding his hand

4135
03:52:37.159 --> 03:52:42.479
<v Speaker 4>like the guy. Dude, what's up?

4136
03:52:43.319 --> 03:52:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Hey just had a question.

4137
03:52:45.239 --> 03:52:48.280
<v Speaker 71>Got a friend who's a Roman Catholic and he was

4138
03:52:48.360 --> 03:52:50.639
<v Speaker 71>trying to tell me that.

4139
03:52:50.840 --> 03:52:51.079
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

4140
03:52:52.600 --> 03:52:55.959
<v Speaker 4>What is that him in the background, bitching like a

4141
03:52:56.000 --> 03:52:56.920
<v Speaker 4>little kiddie.

4142
03:53:01.600 --> 03:53:02.120
<v Speaker 69>Franch.

4143
03:53:03.520 --> 03:53:05.479
<v Speaker 18>Well, he was trying to make the point that Judaism

4144
03:53:05.879 --> 03:53:10.520
<v Speaker 18>could be trace back to Isaac and that Islam could

4145
03:53:10.520 --> 03:53:11.840
<v Speaker 18>be trespect to Ishmael.

4146
03:53:12.639 --> 03:53:14.680
<v Speaker 4>So I think, well, we don't even know that. So

4147
03:53:15.040 --> 03:53:16.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, if you listen to a lot of samsh

4148
03:53:16.639 --> 03:53:19.319
<v Speaker 4>Move's debates, he'll actually question the Muslims on that assumption.

4149
03:53:19.520 --> 03:53:21.319
<v Speaker 4>And but there's no actual proof of that.

4150
03:53:22.040 --> 03:53:24.239
<v Speaker 71>So no, I mean that's what I thought, because I

4151
03:53:24.639 --> 03:53:26.879
<v Speaker 71>really heard no evidence to like support that.

4152
03:53:27.040 --> 03:53:30.000
<v Speaker 4>But just but even if it was the case, what, look,

4153
03:53:30.040 --> 03:53:31.760
<v Speaker 4>how what does this have to do with us?

4154
03:53:34.079 --> 03:53:34.280
<v Speaker 15>Yeah?

4155
03:53:34.680 --> 03:53:37.120
<v Speaker 2>I think he was trying to argue that, like the whole.

4156
03:53:38.479 --> 03:53:45.239
<v Speaker 71>A discussion that you've had with Uh, can't.

4157
03:53:45.239 --> 03:53:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I think of his name right now?

4158
03:53:46.639 --> 03:53:48.760
<v Speaker 4>You're under cat. You're under cat attack?

4159
03:53:48.840 --> 03:53:50.680
<v Speaker 69>Bro yea.

4160
03:53:52.719 --> 03:53:56.239
<v Speaker 4>Is that cats in the background, No, that's my daughter children.

4161
03:53:56.360 --> 03:53:59.520
<v Speaker 4>Oh my bad, like a cat. Watch also said that

4162
03:53:59.559 --> 03:54:02.879
<v Speaker 4>Haitians coming, dude, watch out. Good you better put some

4163
03:54:03.120 --> 03:54:06.959
<v Speaker 4>uh some some lie or something on them kiddies. They're

4164
03:54:06.959 --> 03:54:14.680
<v Speaker 4>gonna get cooked if you coat your cat and lie

4165
03:54:15.000 --> 03:54:16.319
<v Speaker 4>and a Haitian won't eat it.

4166
03:54:18.000 --> 03:54:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, good thing I don't have any cats.

4167
03:54:20.680 --> 03:54:21.120
<v Speaker 4>Go ahead.

4168
03:54:22.040 --> 03:54:27.959
<v Speaker 71>Yeah, so, uh, trying to remember that guy's name, that

4169
03:54:28.079 --> 03:54:29.799
<v Speaker 71>Catholic that he debated a while.

4170
03:54:29.680 --> 03:54:35.040
<v Speaker 4>Back, Gay Gayerson, Yes, that's it.

4171
03:54:35.280 --> 03:54:41.719
<v Speaker 71>Yeah, but he was trying to argue like a, I

4172
03:54:41.760 --> 03:54:44.239
<v Speaker 71>don't know, like that generic god that.

4173
03:54:46.440 --> 03:54:51.399
<v Speaker 4>You all worship and or not you but you mean

4174
03:54:51.440 --> 03:54:55.920
<v Speaker 4>the guy that called in like a couple of days ago. No, No,

4175
03:54:56.399 --> 03:54:59.559
<v Speaker 4>he's like Trent Horne. I don't know what you're talking about. Yeah, yeah, okay,

4176
03:54:59.600 --> 03:55:00.600
<v Speaker 4>what about there we go?

4177
03:55:01.000 --> 03:55:04.440
<v Speaker 71>Oh I think he has probably been like watching some

4178
03:55:04.639 --> 03:55:05.440
<v Speaker 71>of his content.

4179
03:55:05.680 --> 03:55:09.639
<v Speaker 4>So, oh, I see your friends gotcham Yeah yeah.

4180
03:55:11.159 --> 03:55:14.079
<v Speaker 71>Yeah, I just kind of want to just ask that

4181
03:55:15.239 --> 03:55:16.840
<v Speaker 71>kind of just gonna.

4182
03:55:16.959 --> 03:55:20.479
<v Speaker 4>Work, Like I'm sorry, I've totally got I've totally got

4183
03:55:20.520 --> 03:55:25.399
<v Speaker 4>distracted here, Like uh yeah, Game Gamers is the festival

4184
03:55:26.600 --> 03:55:28.479
<v Speaker 4>I'm just in a totally silly mood. I think I've

4185
03:55:28.520 --> 03:55:31.799
<v Speaker 4>gone into total like insanity mode now because we've had

4186
03:55:31.840 --> 03:55:36.920
<v Speaker 4>so many like crazy goofy goofy things tonight. Remember head

4187
03:55:36.920 --> 03:55:41.000
<v Speaker 4>over to chalk dot com. He have his microwaving his cats.

4188
03:55:41.040 --> 03:55:41.120
<v Speaker 9>Bro.

4189
03:55:41.440 --> 03:55:44.559
<v Speaker 4>That was a microwave beep and that was cats. That

4190
03:55:44.680 --> 03:55:47.719
<v Speaker 4>was no kid, that's a Haitian putting them damn cats

4191
03:55:47.760 --> 03:55:55.399
<v Speaker 4>in the microwave. Bro, for real, for realm he's microwaven

4192
03:55:55.440 --> 03:55:56.600
<v Speaker 4>pussy Burger's over there?

4193
03:55:56.799 --> 03:55:58.440
<v Speaker 2>What what.

4194
03:56:00.959 --> 03:56:01.159
<v Speaker 8>I have?

4195
03:56:01.360 --> 03:56:04.680
<v Speaker 4>Terminal brain rot? Are you kidding? I'm on point, bro,

4196
03:56:04.799 --> 03:56:07.000
<v Speaker 4>and I just have to piss really bad. That's the

4197
03:56:07.040 --> 03:56:09.040
<v Speaker 4>only thing that's happened over here. Like, I think I'm

4198
03:56:09.120 --> 03:56:12.440
<v Speaker 4>going insane because my bladder is is.

4199
03:56:15.639 --> 03:56:19.319
<v Speaker 5>Why are you get give me the kitty? I want

4200
03:56:19.360 --> 03:56:21.559
<v Speaker 5>the kitty, Dudes, Like, are you trying to hit all

4201
03:56:21.600 --> 03:56:21.879
<v Speaker 5>my wife?

4202
03:56:21.920 --> 03:56:21.959
<v Speaker 16>No?

4203
03:56:22.000 --> 03:56:28.200
<v Speaker 5>I want the kitty the pit mean Dina, you want

4204
03:56:28.239 --> 03:56:31.200
<v Speaker 5>my wife's kiddy? No, I want your cat, Bro, I

4205
03:56:31.319 --> 03:56:32.120
<v Speaker 5>want Dinah.

4206
03:56:33.719 --> 03:56:41.680
<v Speaker 4>The what's up? Yo yo yo yo yo, sir.

4207
03:56:43.280 --> 03:56:48.639
<v Speaker 2>Uh. So there's been some drama lately. There's this brother.

4208
03:56:48.840 --> 03:56:52.079
<v Speaker 23>Who's been doing apologetics against Islam for a few years. Okay,

4209
03:56:52.200 --> 03:56:55.559
<v Speaker 23>it's now like because he's on the verge of hyposthesizing

4210
03:56:55.600 --> 03:56:56.520
<v Speaker 23>and becoming Muslim.

4211
03:56:57.000 --> 03:56:59.559
<v Speaker 4>Have you killed No, I haven't heard of those.

4212
03:57:01.239 --> 03:57:05.239
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to Holt the guy. That's the reason why.

4213
03:57:05.159 --> 03:57:10.000
<v Speaker 23>He wants to ampostesize is because he he's like he objects.

4214
03:57:09.559 --> 03:57:10.680
<v Speaker 2>To the Islamic dilemma.

4215
03:57:11.159 --> 03:57:14.600
<v Speaker 23>Like I don't agree with him, but I like, but

4216
03:57:14.760 --> 03:57:17.440
<v Speaker 23>I kind of like play devil's advocate for his position

4217
03:57:17.559 --> 03:57:18.799
<v Speaker 23>and see how you would respond to it.

4218
03:57:18.840 --> 03:57:20.479
<v Speaker 4>Okay, well, before we go out, Like, first of all,

4219
03:57:20.559 --> 03:57:22.680
<v Speaker 4>that's not the only reason to not believe Islam, Like

4220
03:57:22.799 --> 03:57:25.239
<v Speaker 4>I mean, zombie Thelma is just one of the many arguments.

4221
03:57:25.280 --> 03:57:28.239
<v Speaker 4>So like, I can't found him a person becoming convestive

4222
03:57:28.520 --> 03:57:34.280
<v Speaker 4>of Islam knowing these things. But go ahead. His argument

4223
03:57:34.399 --> 03:57:34.920
<v Speaker 4>is that like.

4224
03:57:36.680 --> 03:57:40.079
<v Speaker 23>In his view, there's obviously passages in the Quran, who

4225
03:57:40.159 --> 03:57:44.840
<v Speaker 23>he says are like corrective in a very specific sense against.

4226
03:57:44.680 --> 03:57:46.319
<v Speaker 2>Like a biblical verse.

4227
03:57:46.879 --> 03:57:48.959
<v Speaker 23>So like he would cite the verse which says that

4228
03:57:49.200 --> 03:57:51.879
<v Speaker 23>like a law created the world.

4229
03:57:51.959 --> 03:57:55.040
<v Speaker 2>And heavens in six days, and this did not make

4230
03:57:55.120 --> 03:57:55.559
<v Speaker 2>him tired.

4231
03:57:55.680 --> 03:57:57.319
<v Speaker 23>It goes something like this, and he will say, like

4232
03:57:57.719 --> 03:58:01.000
<v Speaker 23>this is obviously a correction to the Genesis account than

4233
03:58:01.079 --> 03:58:01.760
<v Speaker 23>God's resting.

4234
03:58:02.879 --> 03:58:05.799
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but nobody and but nobody in Christianity believe that

4235
03:58:05.840 --> 03:58:08.440
<v Speaker 4>he was literally tired. I mean, that's that's stupid.

4236
03:58:10.680 --> 03:58:12.360
<v Speaker 23>But like I guess he will say, like, this is

4237
03:58:12.680 --> 03:58:15.879
<v Speaker 23>an objection to the idea of God resting, and therefore.

4238
03:58:15.600 --> 03:58:17.239
<v Speaker 4>It must be like, Okay, but does he know that

4239
03:58:17.399 --> 03:58:20.079
<v Speaker 4>all the stupid ship in the hot eaths about a

4240
03:58:20.200 --> 03:58:22.959
<v Speaker 4>lot having gonads and wearing a cloak and being a

4241
03:58:23.040 --> 03:58:24.959
<v Speaker 4>blonde boy with gold hair. I mean, does he know

4242
03:58:25.040 --> 03:58:27.760
<v Speaker 4>any of that? Does he think that's more rational than

4243
03:58:27.840 --> 03:58:28.360
<v Speaker 4>where he's at?

4244
03:58:31.120 --> 03:58:34.520
<v Speaker 2>That's a good question. I guess I tried to reason.

4245
03:58:34.319 --> 03:58:36.319
<v Speaker 4>With him, Well did you reason with him about these

4246
03:58:36.799 --> 03:58:37.559
<v Speaker 4>dumb hadiths?

4247
03:58:40.079 --> 03:58:40.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

4248
03:58:40.959 --> 03:58:44.159
<v Speaker 23>I tried to reasoning with him about like because like

4249
03:58:44.680 --> 03:58:46.280
<v Speaker 23>how do you they will do? You know how I'm

4250
03:58:46.280 --> 03:58:50.120
<v Speaker 23>gonna x Muslim myself? Okay and Muslims like compartable.

4251
03:58:50.159 --> 03:58:51.879
<v Speaker 2>I was like, there's like a cogniti to this one

4252
03:58:51.879 --> 03:58:53.280
<v Speaker 2>that's going to cause still.

4253
03:58:54.360 --> 03:58:56.200
<v Speaker 4>I mean, if there's saw hold on, if there saw

4254
03:58:56.239 --> 03:58:58.079
<v Speaker 4>he don't you have to believe him if you're unless

4255
03:58:58.120 --> 03:59:00.559
<v Speaker 4>you're gonna be a she or something.

4256
03:59:03.440 --> 03:59:05.920
<v Speaker 23>It's sort of a gray zone where it's like you

4257
03:59:05.959 --> 03:59:09.559
<v Speaker 23>can reject the particular hadif and it doesn't make you like,

4258
03:59:09.799 --> 03:59:11.159
<v Speaker 23>this doesn't kick you out of Islam.

4259
03:59:12.239 --> 03:59:14.280
<v Speaker 4>Wait a minute, a minute. But my understanding is that

4260
03:59:14.440 --> 03:59:18.000
<v Speaker 4>they have to have some akida and that will necessitate

4261
03:59:18.079 --> 03:59:21.360
<v Speaker 4>you having some position like you can't, can't, won't they

4262
03:59:21.440 --> 03:59:24.360
<v Speaker 4>say that your shirt If you're like picking and choosing

4263
03:59:24.440 --> 03:59:26.639
<v Speaker 4>hadith that are considered sahi.

4264
03:59:29.639 --> 03:59:34.799
<v Speaker 23>Uh no, at worst, it's simple. And this goes to

4265
03:59:35.000 --> 03:59:39.639
<v Speaker 23>like a problem with Islamic epistemology. Okay, there isn't a

4266
03:59:39.799 --> 03:59:43.120
<v Speaker 23>canon of what hadiths are really sahi. It all comes

4267
03:59:43.200 --> 03:59:46.319
<v Speaker 23>down to like the opinions of scholars, and every hadif

4268
03:59:46.360 --> 03:59:48.840
<v Speaker 23>scholar has his own collection of haddief that he thinks

4269
03:59:48.879 --> 03:59:51.840
<v Speaker 23>is a hai, and like you know, there's like ten

4270
03:59:51.920 --> 03:59:52.639
<v Speaker 23>thousand hadif.

4271
03:59:52.879 --> 03:59:56.079
<v Speaker 4>Okay, okay, Well, even if he can slide past this,

4272
03:59:56.520 --> 03:59:58.600
<v Speaker 4>like I mean, there's enough stupid stuff in the Qur'an,

4273
03:59:58.879 --> 04:00:02.200
<v Speaker 4>like I mean, the Kuran mixes up Bible stories and

4274
04:00:02.239 --> 04:00:05.680
<v Speaker 4>gets them out of whack. So even if he thought

4275
04:00:05.760 --> 04:00:08.600
<v Speaker 4>that like the statement in Genesis was like a corrective

4276
04:00:08.639 --> 04:00:12.040
<v Speaker 4>to the idea that God rested I mean, Gregor Paloma

4277
04:00:12.159 --> 04:00:15.000
<v Speaker 4>says that God resting is is a proof of the

4278
04:00:15.120 --> 04:00:18.680
<v Speaker 4>essence synergy distinction. So I'm surprised this person who's supposed

4279
04:00:18.680 --> 04:00:20.280
<v Speaker 4>to be Orthodox doesn't know that.

4280
04:00:22.360 --> 04:00:24.040
<v Speaker 23>Yeah, and I wanted to get to that, like I

4281
04:00:24.079 --> 04:00:25.840
<v Speaker 23>think this like the long of dilemma.

4282
04:00:25.840 --> 04:00:27.479
<v Speaker 2>As you said, it's a great argument, but it's not

4283
04:00:27.559 --> 04:00:28.319
<v Speaker 2>the only arguments.

4284
04:00:28.559 --> 04:00:30.000
<v Speaker 23>And the other side like if you want to go

4285
04:00:30.159 --> 04:00:32.360
<v Speaker 23>down the road and say that, Okay, No, the kron

4286
04:00:32.399 --> 04:00:34.120
<v Speaker 23>actually super strongly thinks.

4287
04:00:33.920 --> 04:00:37.559
<v Speaker 2>The old scriptures are corrupted. That's a whole other can

4288
04:00:37.639 --> 04:00:38.559
<v Speaker 2>of worms, like why.

4289
04:00:38.440 --> 04:00:41.840
<v Speaker 23>Would God allow scripture to be corrupted for two thousand years?

4290
04:00:41.920 --> 04:00:44.399
<v Speaker 4>Well, and he says that, I mean, the early Muslim

4291
04:00:44.479 --> 04:00:47.559
<v Speaker 4>said interpreting the Koran that all his words cannot be corrupted.

4292
04:00:50.920 --> 04:00:51.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly.

4293
04:00:52.399 --> 04:00:54.399
<v Speaker 23>And the verse they always cite to show that the

4294
04:00:54.520 --> 04:00:58.040
<v Speaker 23>Qur'an is preserved, it actually doesn't say that the chron

4295
04:00:58.120 --> 04:00:59.920
<v Speaker 23>is presently says that scripture is preserved.

4296
04:01:00.360 --> 04:01:03.120
<v Speaker 2>We will preserve the scripture is what it says.

4297
04:01:03.319 --> 04:01:07.360
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So the assumption is that we're not told what

4298
04:01:07.440 --> 04:01:11.239
<v Speaker 4>that is, so that could be anything. Is that the

4299
04:01:11.280 --> 04:01:14.520
<v Speaker 4>point you're making? In other words, scripture meaning the Bible,

4300
04:01:14.760 --> 04:01:16.959
<v Speaker 4>or that it's ambiguous.

4301
04:01:19.000 --> 04:01:21.639
<v Speaker 2>They will read it. That's the qurana. But there's nothing.

4302
04:01:22.280 --> 04:01:24.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but it's ambiguous, is what you're saying.

4303
04:01:24.760 --> 04:01:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, I can give you the words. I can google.

4304
04:01:27.079 --> 04:01:27.520
<v Speaker 2>It's square.

4305
04:01:32.840 --> 04:01:34.479
<v Speaker 4>What's what's the reference.

4306
04:01:35.719 --> 04:01:46.040
<v Speaker 24>The town's verse fifteen nine?

4307
04:01:51.239 --> 04:01:53.799
<v Speaker 4>Is this a prominent person or a lesser known person

4308
04:01:53.879 --> 04:01:54.639
<v Speaker 4>that we're talking about?

4309
04:01:55.959 --> 04:02:01.079
<v Speaker 2>The guy who's leaving. Yeah, I guess it's around like

4310
04:02:01.280 --> 04:02:02.360
<v Speaker 2>one thousand followers.

4311
04:02:03.440 --> 04:02:07.200
<v Speaker 4>He's strictly on Twitter, can can You don't want to

4312
04:02:07.200 --> 04:02:07.719
<v Speaker 4>say who it is?

4313
04:02:10.000 --> 04:02:13.159
<v Speaker 2>Al fin Lundi is what he is? Like you in

4314
04:02:13.600 --> 04:02:14.239
<v Speaker 2>the alphawds?

4315
04:02:15.760 --> 04:02:15.879
<v Speaker 24>Uh?

4316
04:02:17.000 --> 04:02:20.000
<v Speaker 23>His Twitter at is at Al fin Landi, like Al

4317
04:02:20.120 --> 04:02:22.639
<v Speaker 23>the Arab plagued and fin Lundy like.

4318
04:02:23.280 --> 04:02:24.639
<v Speaker 4>I don't even know who it is. So that's fine.

4319
04:02:26.520 --> 04:02:31.079
<v Speaker 4>Oh so fifty nine said fifteen Yeah, I'm not familiar

4320
04:02:31.120 --> 04:02:32.840
<v Speaker 4>with the person. Fifty nine says that A certainly we

4321
04:02:32.920 --> 04:02:35.120
<v Speaker 4>who have revealed the reminder, and a certainly way who

4322
04:02:35.120 --> 04:02:37.959
<v Speaker 4>will preserve it? So is the Arabic scripture there.

4323
04:02:41.159 --> 04:02:43.440
<v Speaker 2>If they will read it us. This is the This

4324
04:02:43.559 --> 04:02:46.280
<v Speaker 2>is like the super important verse from Muslims.

4325
04:02:46.840 --> 04:02:49.159
<v Speaker 23>This is where they take the idea, the theological idea

4326
04:02:49.200 --> 04:02:50.680
<v Speaker 23>that the crime is preserved.

4327
04:02:50.520 --> 04:02:51.559
<v Speaker 8>And will be preserved.

4328
04:02:52.360 --> 04:02:55.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, and it's a pretty ambiguous words like we sent

4329
04:02:55.680 --> 04:02:58.280
<v Speaker 2>down a reminder and we will preserve it. What is

4330
04:02:58.280 --> 04:02:58.799
<v Speaker 2>the reminder?

4331
04:02:59.319 --> 04:03:06.680
<v Speaker 4>I see, Yeah, I understand what you're saying. It's ambiguous.

4332
04:03:06.760 --> 04:03:08.680
<v Speaker 4>But now so was he is he trying to use

4333
04:03:08.719 --> 04:03:10.799
<v Speaker 4>this this I don't understand, Like what what does this prove?

4334
04:03:12.000 --> 04:03:13.920
<v Speaker 4>Would you would your would this guy? Would he go

4335
04:03:14.000 --> 04:03:16.360
<v Speaker 4>talk to Sam Shamun or Christian Prince or somebody?

4336
04:03:18.639 --> 04:03:18.799
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

4337
04:03:19.879 --> 04:03:21.559
<v Speaker 23>I tried to try to commit them to go in

4338
04:03:21.639 --> 04:03:23.920
<v Speaker 23>this date you here, but he even.

4339
04:03:23.719 --> 04:03:26.879
<v Speaker 4>Wants But well he can, he should go. He can

4340
04:03:26.959 --> 04:03:28.879
<v Speaker 4>have a conversation. He doesn't have to have it to date.

4341
04:03:29.040 --> 04:03:32.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yeah, I'll.

4342
04:03:34.319 --> 04:03:39.600
<v Speaker 23>Uh talk to him, but yeah, plant, I can't talk

4343
04:03:39.600 --> 04:03:40.680
<v Speaker 23>to another thing about like.

4344
04:03:40.760 --> 04:03:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Towh and Islam?

4345
04:03:44.959 --> 04:03:45.879
<v Speaker 4>I miss I missed that.

4346
04:03:45.959 --> 04:03:50.840
<v Speaker 23>What can I just talk about other things about Islam?

4347
04:03:51.479 --> 04:03:51.600
<v Speaker 7>Uh?

4348
04:03:51.840 --> 04:03:53.719
<v Speaker 4>Well, I'm gonna have to. I'm gonna move on. I'm

4349
04:03:53.719 --> 04:03:56.079
<v Speaker 4>not trying to be rude to you, and we'll come

4350
04:03:56.159 --> 04:03:59.920
<v Speaker 4>back maybe, but I'm gonna somebody has come in as myself.

4351
04:04:00.879 --> 04:04:07.639
<v Speaker 4>So Jay Dyer, what's your argument? Go ahead and me

4352
04:04:07.799 --> 04:04:19.280
<v Speaker 4>unmute you have to unmute me. Oh hey hey Jay, hey, j.

4353
04:04:21.719 --> 04:04:28.239
<v Speaker 72>So you think that Catholicism is false because we think

4354
04:04:28.399 --> 04:04:30.440
<v Speaker 72>Muslims will worship the same God or or that's a

4355
04:04:30.559 --> 04:04:32.239
<v Speaker 72>reason why it's evidence.

4356
04:04:31.959 --> 04:04:34.440
<v Speaker 4>Of the false Well, not that you think that you've

4357
04:04:34.479 --> 04:04:38.079
<v Speaker 4>dogmatically stated that more than once, right, Yeah, that we've

4358
04:04:38.159 --> 04:04:39.319
<v Speaker 4>dougmated so.

4359
04:04:40.000 --> 04:04:42.920
<v Speaker 72>And one of the things that you bring up to

4360
04:04:43.000 --> 04:04:47.479
<v Speaker 72>prove that is that they deny the incarnation, therefore they

4361
04:04:47.559 --> 04:04:47.959
<v Speaker 72>deny the.

4362
04:04:47.959 --> 04:04:53.760
<v Speaker 4>Father, right, Because, well, there's many reasons why that's the case,

4363
04:04:53.920 --> 04:04:56.479
<v Speaker 4>one of which is that the word God is a

4364
04:04:56.959 --> 04:05:00.399
<v Speaker 4>generic reference and it doesn't have, without a conc or

4365
04:05:00.440 --> 04:05:03.559
<v Speaker 4>an intentionality, any specific reference. So how do we know

4366
04:05:03.760 --> 04:05:05.840
<v Speaker 4>that it's the same God just on the basis of

4367
04:05:05.879 --> 04:05:10.719
<v Speaker 4>the term God. But I argue more specifically that the

4368
04:05:10.799 --> 04:05:16.079
<v Speaker 4>texts of the Vatican two nosertat Limagentium state that they

4369
04:05:16.159 --> 04:05:19.879
<v Speaker 4>also adore the same God and have the faith of Abraham.

4370
04:05:20.159 --> 04:05:22.239
<v Speaker 4>And they do not have the faith of Abraham. Because

4371
04:05:22.360 --> 04:05:24.959
<v Speaker 4>the New Testament many times over, every time it talks

4372
04:05:25.000 --> 04:05:27.079
<v Speaker 4>about the faith of Abraham, it specifies that it is

4373
04:05:27.280 --> 04:05:31.559
<v Speaker 4>the Triune God that Abraham worshiped and that Abraham believed

4374
04:05:31.559 --> 04:05:33.680
<v Speaker 4>the Gospel. So the faith of Abraham has to be

4375
04:05:33.799 --> 04:05:36.319
<v Speaker 4>faith in Christ. There is no faith of Abraham. That's

4376
04:05:36.479 --> 04:05:38.440
<v Speaker 4>Muslim option or this Jewish option.

4377
04:05:40.040 --> 04:05:40.479
<v Speaker 61>I see.

4378
04:05:40.639 --> 04:05:44.280
<v Speaker 19>So, so you may be open to saying that they

4379
04:05:44.440 --> 04:05:46.600
<v Speaker 19>acknowledge the same God even if they don't have the faith.

4380
04:05:46.840 --> 04:05:48.399
<v Speaker 2>But they don't have the faith, well.

4381
04:05:48.280 --> 04:05:52.719
<v Speaker 4>I mean, as a Satanist can say I acknowledge one God.

4382
04:05:52.799 --> 04:05:55.120
<v Speaker 4>Does that make a Satanist the same as us because

4383
04:05:55.159 --> 04:05:55.959
<v Speaker 4>he's a monotheist.

4384
04:05:58.559 --> 04:06:01.440
<v Speaker 19>No, I'm just asking you because a lot of times

4385
04:06:01.479 --> 04:06:02.000
<v Speaker 19>people say we.

4386
04:06:02.000 --> 04:06:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Don't worship the same God. We don't, okay, And and

4387
04:06:06.440 --> 04:06:07.000
<v Speaker 2>your reason for.

4388
04:06:07.040 --> 04:06:09.319
<v Speaker 4>Saying that is, well, this is the reason that That's

4389
04:06:09.360 --> 04:06:11.280
<v Speaker 4>the reason that I just gave. And there's many other

4390
04:06:11.319 --> 04:06:16.200
<v Speaker 4>reasons too. For example, Muslims exclude many essential attributes. Did

4391
04:06:16.280 --> 04:06:16.600
<v Speaker 4>you know that?

4392
04:06:18.239 --> 04:06:19.159
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I understand.

4393
04:06:19.200 --> 04:06:22.319
<v Speaker 19>Well, I understand you know you have a specific understand

4394
04:06:22.399 --> 04:06:24.479
<v Speaker 19>Are the Orthodox have a different view of God's nature?

4395
04:06:25.440 --> 04:06:26.760
<v Speaker 2>And is that energies and everything? No?

4396
04:06:26.799 --> 04:06:29.559
<v Speaker 4>No, No, I'm saying that on your position, you believe

4397
04:06:29.600 --> 04:06:32.319
<v Speaker 4>in attributes that are essential to who God is that

4398
04:06:32.479 --> 04:06:37.920
<v Speaker 4>Muslims exclude. So how is it how how even on

4399
04:06:38.000 --> 04:06:39.799
<v Speaker 4>your own position, is it the same reference?

4400
04:06:42.920 --> 04:06:46.040
<v Speaker 19>I would say it's the same reference in the same

4401
04:06:46.200 --> 04:06:50.799
<v Speaker 19>way that the New Testament assumes that Jews acknowledge the

4402
04:06:50.840 --> 04:06:52.079
<v Speaker 19>same God, despite.

4403
04:06:51.760 --> 04:06:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Them not acknowledging the sun.

4404
04:06:53.239 --> 04:06:55.840
<v Speaker 4>But does Jesus operate that way when he debates with

4405
04:06:55.840 --> 04:06:58.399
<v Speaker 4>the Pharisees on this very question in John five through nine,

4406
04:07:00.959 --> 04:07:03.440
<v Speaker 4>Because it's pretty sure Jesus says, you have never seen

4407
04:07:03.520 --> 04:07:06.200
<v Speaker 4>him nor known him when he argues with the Pharisees

4408
04:07:06.239 --> 04:07:06.799
<v Speaker 4>over this question.

4409
04:07:09.959 --> 04:07:11.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he says, they haven't seen him or known him.

4410
04:07:11.760 --> 04:07:12.760
<v Speaker 4>Oh, but it's the same God.

4411
04:07:15.159 --> 04:07:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, they have a they have a zeal for God, right.

4412
04:07:19.600 --> 04:07:22.520
<v Speaker 4>But not according to knowledge, so it's not the right God.

4413
04:07:23.559 --> 04:07:25.840
<v Speaker 4>By the way, in the New Testament, you can distinguish

4414
04:07:25.959 --> 04:07:31.520
<v Speaker 4>between a conceptual idea and a relationship. So knowing God

4415
04:07:31.600 --> 04:07:35.879
<v Speaker 4>in the sense of a relationship, which that term is

4416
04:07:36.000 --> 04:07:38.200
<v Speaker 4>used specifically for no in the sense, and it's the

4417
04:07:38.239 --> 04:07:40.200
<v Speaker 4>same term that's used for husband and wife to know,

4418
04:07:40.840 --> 04:07:45.159
<v Speaker 4>versus having an abstract conceptual knowledge of something. Let's give

4419
04:07:45.200 --> 04:07:48.440
<v Speaker 4>another example. Mormons say that they believe in Jesus Christ.

4420
04:07:48.959 --> 04:07:50.959
<v Speaker 4>Do they believe in Jesus Christ like us?

4421
04:07:53.719 --> 04:07:55.680
<v Speaker 2>They know that Jesus is different?

4422
04:07:55.760 --> 04:07:59.639
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, okay, so then that disproves this whole natural theology approach.

4423
04:08:02.280 --> 04:08:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that.

4424
04:08:04.840 --> 04:08:10.000
<v Speaker 72>You're the way that you do you so you're okay

4425
04:08:10.159 --> 04:08:14.719
<v Speaker 72>with saying that they try to honor God if based

4426
04:08:14.760 --> 04:08:17.079
<v Speaker 72>on that, it's not wrong to say they try to

4427
04:08:17.159 --> 04:08:19.959
<v Speaker 72>honor God but ignorantly, because that seems to be with

4428
04:08:20.000 --> 04:08:20.719
<v Speaker 72>Saint Paul's it.

4429
04:08:21.120 --> 04:08:23.159
<v Speaker 4>Well, well, whether Saint Paul's said that or not in

4430
04:08:23.280 --> 04:08:26.520
<v Speaker 4>Acts seventeen is one thing. But the problem is that

4431
04:08:26.719 --> 04:08:30.639
<v Speaker 4>Vatican two says, and the Catechism as well, that they

4432
04:08:30.799 --> 04:08:34.479
<v Speaker 4>have the faith of Abraham and that they adore God

4433
04:08:34.760 --> 04:08:38.639
<v Speaker 4>like us. An adoration in your theology is specifically worship,

4434
04:08:39.000 --> 04:08:40.920
<v Speaker 4>which is just simply not true. So I Vatican two,

4435
04:08:41.239 --> 04:08:45.239
<v Speaker 4>if they specified, for example, that they have an abstract

4436
04:08:45.280 --> 04:08:47.559
<v Speaker 4>conceptual knowledge of God or they seek to do this,

4437
04:08:48.040 --> 04:08:50.040
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't say that, it says that they actually do it.

4438
04:08:50.200 --> 04:08:50.840
<v Speaker 4>That's the problem.

4439
04:08:52.440 --> 04:08:54.600
<v Speaker 19>Okay, So you have the issue with the faith of

4440
04:08:54.639 --> 04:08:58.120
<v Speaker 19>Abraham and at the term adore being applied to Okay.

4441
04:08:57.879 --> 04:09:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Correctly, All right, well I appreciate that.

4442
04:09:01.399 --> 04:09:01.639
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

4443
04:09:04.280 --> 04:09:06.559
<v Speaker 4>Interesting, I thought that was going to turn into a

4444
04:09:06.680 --> 04:09:16.239
<v Speaker 4>really nasty Roman Catholic interaction, but that was a fair interaction. Echthelion. Yeah,

4445
04:09:16.280 --> 04:09:19.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean, when this comes up, I think that Roman

4446
04:09:19.959 --> 04:09:23.239
<v Speaker 4>Catholics could have gotten around this if it had not

4447
04:09:23.479 --> 04:09:26.920
<v Speaker 4>said faith of Abraham in I think e limgentium. Let's

4448
04:09:26.959 --> 04:09:30.040
<v Speaker 4>go to limitgentium on that. And if it had not

4449
04:09:30.159 --> 04:09:38.040
<v Speaker 4>said adoration, because those are really you know, let's see

4450
04:09:42.040 --> 04:09:44.000
<v Speaker 4>like it said, like right here it says the Muslims

4451
04:09:44.000 --> 04:09:46.479
<v Speaker 4>who professed to hold the faith of Abraham. So right

4452
04:09:46.600 --> 04:09:50.040
<v Speaker 4>there you might could say, well, but there it doesn't

4453
04:09:50.079 --> 04:09:52.079
<v Speaker 4>say they do it. It says they profess to. But

4454
04:09:52.239 --> 04:09:55.159
<v Speaker 4>then it says along with us they adore the one

4455
04:09:55.200 --> 04:09:58.680
<v Speaker 4>immerciful God, which is identifying it as the same reference.

4456
04:09:58.760 --> 04:10:00.680
<v Speaker 4>You see how that is where it it's difficult, And

4457
04:10:00.760 --> 04:10:04.040
<v Speaker 4>then that's not that's just lumin Gentem sixteen. All show

4458
04:10:04.120 --> 04:10:08.479
<v Speaker 4>in Nora Tata says that they take pains to submit

4459
04:10:08.600 --> 04:10:14.200
<v Speaker 4>to God's decrees, just as did Abraham, who who with

4460
04:10:14.399 --> 04:10:16.799
<v Speaker 4>whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself,

4461
04:10:16.920 --> 04:10:17.879
<v Speaker 4>submits to God.

4462
04:10:18.799 --> 04:10:19.239
<v Speaker 2>So you have.

4463
04:10:21.040 --> 04:10:25.360
<v Speaker 4>Both of those things there with us they adore God,

4464
04:10:26.399 --> 04:10:30.319
<v Speaker 4>they have the faith of Abraham. In Nos Tante and

4465
04:10:30.399 --> 04:10:34.520
<v Speaker 4>I think the way the Catechism phrases the catelic catechor

4466
04:10:34.639 --> 04:10:37.920
<v Speaker 4>it basically just summarizes the way these two documents speak.

4467
04:10:38.680 --> 04:10:41.079
<v Speaker 4>But anyway, that's not even the only problem, because it

4468
04:10:41.120 --> 04:10:43.959
<v Speaker 4>says the same thing about Hindus, and that one I don't.

4469
04:10:44.120 --> 04:10:48.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't see how in nosratate like, I mean, how

4470
04:10:48.040 --> 04:10:52.280
<v Speaker 4>does the Hindu worship God in love? Trying to find

4471
04:10:52.280 --> 04:11:09.719
<v Speaker 4>the Hindu statement, here's Buddhism. Thus, in Hinduism, men contemplate

4472
04:11:09.760 --> 04:11:13.559
<v Speaker 4>the divine mystery and seek it through philosophical inquiry, blah

4473
04:11:13.600 --> 04:11:19.200
<v Speaker 4>blah blah. They seek freedom from anglish and through ascetical

4474
04:11:19.319 --> 04:11:23.440
<v Speaker 4>practices and profound meditation, a flight to God with love

4475
04:11:23.479 --> 04:11:26.879
<v Speaker 4>and trust. I don't I don't see how you can

4476
04:11:26.920 --> 04:11:32.639
<v Speaker 4>say that, because it's the way it's worded. It says

4477
04:11:33.200 --> 04:11:36.799
<v Speaker 4>through the I mean, Hinduism is totally demonic. So in

4478
04:11:36.959 --> 04:11:39.920
<v Speaker 4>their ascetic practices, which are like self harm and all

4479
04:11:39.959 --> 04:11:42.639
<v Speaker 4>this crazy stuff, they're not actually attaining to God. But

4480
04:11:42.799 --> 04:11:46.479
<v Speaker 4>this says they're seeking meditation and flight to God with

4481
04:11:46.680 --> 04:11:49.680
<v Speaker 4>love and trust. And I don't see how that how

4482
04:11:49.840 --> 04:11:54.840
<v Speaker 4>you could say that excilion, because it's not saying in spite,

4483
04:11:54.959 --> 04:11:58.319
<v Speaker 4>it's saying in Hinduism. So in other words, in the

4484
04:11:58.399 --> 04:12:02.639
<v Speaker 4>false religion they're doing this, it's not saying in spite

4485
04:12:02.680 --> 04:12:06.120
<v Speaker 4>of their you know, idolatry and false religion. They're groping

4486
04:12:06.200 --> 04:12:08.399
<v Speaker 4>after God. That's you know, Act seventeen is the way

4487
04:12:08.440 --> 04:12:14.120
<v Speaker 4>Paul words it. This says in Hinduism, in Islam, and

4488
04:12:14.600 --> 04:12:20.559
<v Speaker 4>as even Tim Gordon admits now he thinks the worst

4489
04:12:20.680 --> 04:12:24.079
<v Speaker 4>position is the Jews. He says, what's said about the

4490
04:12:24.159 --> 04:12:29.760
<v Speaker 4>Jews here is the real impossible position to admit because

4491
04:12:29.799 --> 04:12:33.159
<v Speaker 4>of the previous Catholic tradition on the perfidious Jews is

4492
04:12:33.200 --> 04:12:38.120
<v Speaker 4>the liturgical statements. He says. The way that Luminingentie Minister

4493
04:12:38.200 --> 04:12:42.319
<v Speaker 4>Tat speak of the Jews is even more difficult. Okay, well,

4494
04:12:42.399 --> 04:12:44.200
<v Speaker 4>whatever position you want to take on that, I think

4495
04:12:44.239 --> 04:12:47.559
<v Speaker 4>that really they're all wrong headed. Do you want to

4496
04:12:47.639 --> 04:12:48.520
<v Speaker 4>speak excilion?

4497
04:12:49.600 --> 04:12:50.280
<v Speaker 2>I do? I do.

4498
04:12:51.360 --> 04:12:56.479
<v Speaker 26>So I've just had I'm a Protestant, previous Protestant who's

4499
04:12:56.559 --> 04:12:59.920
<v Speaker 26>now an Eastern Orthodox, just started catechy in two weeks ago,

4500
04:13:00.959 --> 04:13:04.479
<v Speaker 26>and I've been having every time I meet up with

4501
04:13:04.559 --> 04:13:06.760
<v Speaker 26>one of my old Protestant buddies, they want to debate

4502
04:13:06.840 --> 04:13:09.719
<v Speaker 26>me on why you know, they want to convert.

4503
04:13:09.520 --> 04:13:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Me back to Protestantism.

4504
04:13:11.000 --> 04:13:15.479
<v Speaker 26>Sure, and uh so I recently had a conversation with

4505
04:13:15.600 --> 04:13:17.079
<v Speaker 26>my buddy Omar, who.

4506
04:13:18.319 --> 04:13:21.440
<v Speaker 4>You most could become mother and equal three.

4507
04:13:22.280 --> 04:13:25.040
<v Speaker 26>He actually is he actually is an ex Mohammedan, but

4508
04:13:25.120 --> 04:13:29.559
<v Speaker 26>he's a Protestant now, and uh yeah he was.

4509
04:13:29.719 --> 04:13:31.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, me and him were kind of going back

4510
04:13:31.040 --> 04:13:31.319
<v Speaker 2>and forth.

4511
04:13:31.360 --> 04:13:34.360
<v Speaker 26>We're having an argument, and so basically I just want

4512
04:13:34.399 --> 04:13:36.559
<v Speaker 26>to kind of present to use some of the arguments

4513
04:13:36.600 --> 04:13:38.280
<v Speaker 26>he was making to me that I was having a

4514
04:13:38.319 --> 04:13:41.680
<v Speaker 26>hard time responding to, not because they were sound arguments,

4515
04:13:41.760 --> 04:13:45.440
<v Speaker 26>but more just because they were just difficult to respond to.

4516
04:13:45.600 --> 04:13:48.520
<v Speaker 26>They're like, so I'll give you an example. One of

4517
04:13:48.559 --> 04:13:52.799
<v Speaker 26>his arguments was like about the invisible church, right that

4518
04:13:53.639 --> 04:13:56.360
<v Speaker 26>you know, the the church that Jesus Christ said up

4519
04:13:56.760 --> 04:14:00.799
<v Speaker 26>was something that you know, we can't see, feel or touch.

4520
04:14:01.040 --> 04:14:04.680
<v Speaker 26>It doesn't have you know, some structure or place to

4521
04:14:04.799 --> 04:14:08.600
<v Speaker 26>go to, but is just you know, it just exists,

4522
04:14:08.760 --> 04:14:10.200
<v Speaker 26>like kind of like the last color.

4523
04:14:10.120 --> 04:14:11.559
<v Speaker 2>Was saying, you know, it's the right.

4524
04:14:11.680 --> 04:14:12.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I used to be I used to be

4525
04:14:12.959 --> 04:14:16.319
<v Speaker 4>a Protestant. I know the invisible church doctrine what I'm saying.

4526
04:14:16.159 --> 04:14:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Right, So, like, how do I respond to that kind

4527
04:14:17.799 --> 04:14:18.280
<v Speaker 2>of argument?

4528
04:14:18.760 --> 04:14:21.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, simply put, the church is identified in the New

4529
04:14:21.719 --> 04:14:25.840
<v Speaker 4>Testament as the Body of Christ, and christ body was

4530
04:14:25.879 --> 04:14:29.719
<v Speaker 4>a human body, it wasn't a spiritual body. That's Gnostic

4531
04:14:30.200 --> 04:14:33.239
<v Speaker 4>in Christ's body in Paul's analogy, has to be as

4532
04:14:33.319 --> 04:14:36.600
<v Speaker 4>one and unite it as his physical body. So they

4533
04:14:36.639 --> 04:14:40.879
<v Speaker 4>have a Gnostic Nestorian ecclesiology. When they say that there's

4534
04:14:40.959 --> 04:14:46.719
<v Speaker 4>this invisible body that doesn't exist, it's an actual this too.

4535
04:14:48.399 --> 04:14:51.159
<v Speaker 4>The Donatists are their first to teach a an invisible

4536
04:14:51.239 --> 04:14:54.120
<v Speaker 4>church because of their purity doctrine. So their idea is, well,

4537
04:14:54.520 --> 04:14:57.799
<v Speaker 4>only the pure that do not commit sin have the

4538
04:14:57.879 --> 04:15:01.879
<v Speaker 4>grace and have the sacraments. So yes, they're notice.

4539
04:15:02.120 --> 04:15:04.799
<v Speaker 2>Also, what's this just dawn on me the other day?

4540
04:15:07.239 --> 04:15:09.760
<v Speaker 2>God is not a god of confusion. And what this

4541
04:15:10.280 --> 04:15:13.600
<v Speaker 2>does is it it blurs the boundaries.

4542
04:15:13.680 --> 04:15:18.200
<v Speaker 18>You can't actually, for us, the church militant ever identify

4543
04:15:18.360 --> 04:15:21.399
<v Speaker 18>where the church is. So it could be over that.

4544
04:15:22.079 --> 04:15:25.680
<v Speaker 18>Do you see how problematic that is? Who to say

4545
04:15:25.799 --> 04:15:28.200
<v Speaker 18>it could be the And of course.

4546
04:15:28.000 --> 04:15:32.079
<v Speaker 2>This is exactly where humanism comes at. That's just the

4547
04:15:32.200 --> 04:15:33.520
<v Speaker 2>next step. Well, where we.

4548
04:15:33.799 --> 04:15:36.280
<v Speaker 18>Say that the Hindus not worshiping the same you know,

4549
04:15:36.399 --> 04:15:37.920
<v Speaker 18>the boundaries they are invisible.

4550
04:15:38.120 --> 04:15:42.360
<v Speaker 2>We could and that's also Jay, you.

4551
04:15:42.360 --> 04:15:45.479
<v Speaker 18>Were trying that into the gnostic But you know, narcissism

4552
04:15:46.319 --> 04:15:51.040
<v Speaker 18>connection with the uphol is to what blur boundaries. It's

4553
04:15:51.120 --> 04:15:54.840
<v Speaker 18>all boundaries. So I think it's important that we point

4554
04:15:54.920 --> 04:15:57.719
<v Speaker 18>that out. So you've got a god a confusion that.

4555
04:15:57.719 --> 04:16:00.520
<v Speaker 2>It's going to basically be like set a store. It's

4556
04:16:00.559 --> 04:16:02.639
<v Speaker 2>like you can never actually tell where the church is.

4557
04:16:03.280 --> 04:16:06.079
<v Speaker 18>We're gonna blur the boundaries, and now we're gonna have

4558
04:16:06.079 --> 04:16:09.440
<v Speaker 18>always people being confused and ending up in Hindu cults

4559
04:16:09.479 --> 04:16:13.319
<v Speaker 18>and stuff and and Muslims because we're all, you know,

4560
04:16:13.639 --> 04:16:14.639
<v Speaker 18>who knows where.

4561
04:16:14.440 --> 04:16:15.079
<v Speaker 2>The church is? Right?

4562
04:16:15.120 --> 04:16:17.600
<v Speaker 4>And remember Paul says in Ephesians, right, the church is

4563
04:16:17.799 --> 04:16:22.159
<v Speaker 4>there's one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one body. I

4564
04:16:22.239 --> 04:16:25.920
<v Speaker 4>mean not I mean if it's invisible, then that then

4565
04:16:26.079 --> 04:16:30.040
<v Speaker 4>Paul's really pointing out something that doesn't do anybody any good. Right,

4566
04:16:30.319 --> 04:16:32.719
<v Speaker 4>If it's visible, then like Father Decan saying, oh, that's

4567
04:16:32.760 --> 04:16:34.760
<v Speaker 4>the one that we can recognize, that we can identify.

4568
04:16:37.559 --> 04:16:39.399
<v Speaker 26>Yeah, And that was kind of my argument to him,

4569
04:16:39.559 --> 04:16:43.399
<v Speaker 26>was like, you know, where where are the bishops in

4570
04:16:43.520 --> 04:16:46.799
<v Speaker 26>this so called invisible church? You know, where are the deacons,

4571
04:16:46.799 --> 04:16:49.959
<v Speaker 26>where are the presbyters? Where is the authoritative like structure

4572
04:16:50.239 --> 04:16:52.239
<v Speaker 26>that was set up and handed down?

4573
04:16:52.639 --> 04:16:53.239
<v Speaker 2>Because it was.

4574
04:16:53.280 --> 04:16:56.440
<v Speaker 26>Weird, like he did actually admit that he believes in

4575
04:16:56.600 --> 04:16:59.799
<v Speaker 26>the handing down of the like laying on of hisns

4576
04:17:00.479 --> 04:17:03.840
<v Speaker 26>and you know, the sort of Apostolic succession that we

4577
04:17:03.959 --> 04:17:06.120
<v Speaker 26>as Orthodoxy might affirm.

4578
04:17:06.280 --> 04:17:08.600
<v Speaker 2>He's like, oh, yeah, I believe in that. But then

4579
04:17:08.680 --> 04:17:10.319
<v Speaker 2>when I'm like, okay, so where did that go?

4580
04:17:10.639 --> 04:17:12.479
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, you can't believe in that and not

4581
04:17:12.600 --> 04:17:15.799
<v Speaker 4>apply it to history, because it's a historical thing, just

4582
04:17:15.959 --> 04:17:19.280
<v Speaker 4>like just like in numbers eleven, it's an actual historical

4583
04:17:19.440 --> 04:17:22.879
<v Speaker 4>Israel that Moses is laying hands on people and the

4584
04:17:22.959 --> 04:17:25.799
<v Speaker 4>spirit is being passed on, right, and he.

4585
04:17:26.120 --> 04:17:29.479
<v Speaker 26>He was his argument was like, well, you know, eventually

4586
04:17:29.600 --> 04:17:32.639
<v Speaker 26>it got you know, subverted, and then people took over.

4587
04:17:32.680 --> 04:17:35.000
<v Speaker 4>Who were like, you know, anyway, well then then the

4588
04:17:35.319 --> 04:17:37.520
<v Speaker 4>gates of alper bail against the church. Yeah, so this

4589
04:17:37.680 --> 04:17:41.639
<v Speaker 4>is all the same kind of right, And we brought.

4590
04:17:41.520 --> 04:17:47.559
<v Speaker 18>Up earlier in this Twitter space saying ignacious.

4591
04:17:47.680 --> 04:17:53.200
<v Speaker 10>I'm trying to member his letter to one of his

4592
04:17:53.360 --> 04:17:56.920
<v Speaker 10>letters forgive me says and.

4593
04:17:57.000 --> 04:18:02.360
<v Speaker 18>Remember he's writing under apstock authority at the time, Saint

4594
04:18:02.440 --> 04:18:04.280
<v Speaker 18>John and Polycarp.

4595
04:18:04.719 --> 04:18:08.879
<v Speaker 2>That the church is where the bishop is. So I mean,

4596
04:18:08.920 --> 04:18:11.559
<v Speaker 2>what is the Protestant going to say about about that?

4597
04:18:12.159 --> 04:18:13.159
<v Speaker 2>They don't have any bishops.

4598
04:18:13.840 --> 04:18:17.559
<v Speaker 4>Right, Well, I keep in mind you got your body.

4599
04:18:17.559 --> 04:18:21.159
<v Speaker 4>There's kind of being inconsistent because there aren't any Protestants

4600
04:18:21.319 --> 04:18:25.399
<v Speaker 4>that actually believe in a laying on of hands that's

4601
04:18:25.520 --> 04:18:28.639
<v Speaker 4>historical that passes on the Holy Spirit. There's Protestants that

4602
04:18:28.639 --> 04:18:30.440
<v Speaker 4>believe in laying on of hands, like the laying on

4603
04:18:30.520 --> 04:18:33.760
<v Speaker 4>of hands of elders and Protestants and Presbyterianism and stuff,

4604
04:18:34.000 --> 04:18:36.440
<v Speaker 4>but they do not believe that there's a transmission of

4605
04:18:36.520 --> 04:18:39.360
<v Speaker 4>the gift of the Holy Spirit that's generation to generation.

4606
04:18:39.559 --> 04:18:41.680
<v Speaker 4>That that's not something Protestants don't believe.

4607
04:18:42.399 --> 04:18:46.159
<v Speaker 18>And I would suggest to Father Pomazanski in the Orthodox

4608
04:18:46.239 --> 04:18:48.360
<v Speaker 18>Dogmatic Theology talks about this.

4609
04:18:50.959 --> 04:18:52.239
<v Speaker 2>It makes a really good distinction.

4610
04:18:52.799 --> 04:18:55.920
<v Speaker 18>So basically, in Protestant the laying on of hands is

4611
04:18:56.319 --> 04:19:00.280
<v Speaker 18>a democratic election, and they do not believe any that

4612
04:19:00.479 --> 04:19:04.440
<v Speaker 18>is supernatural. Yeah, if there's any supernatural grace, it's uh

4613
04:19:05.079 --> 04:19:09.600
<v Speaker 18>or charisma that's conveyed through an authority or office. Because

4614
04:19:09.639 --> 04:19:12.239
<v Speaker 18>in Protestantism mean I remember as a Lutheran.

4615
04:19:12.360 --> 04:19:20.040
<v Speaker 73>Even the pastor they're basically elevated laity. It's like a yeah,

4616
04:19:20.239 --> 04:19:24.479
<v Speaker 73>you might be called to is lady be an administrator or.

4617
04:19:24.520 --> 04:19:27.719
<v Speaker 2>Something like that. But nobody's above any other. It's just

4618
04:19:27.799 --> 04:19:31.479
<v Speaker 2>a call. There's no actual authority. There's there's no real

4619
04:19:31.639 --> 04:19:32.639
<v Speaker 2>priesthood either.

4620
04:19:32.719 --> 04:19:36.159
<v Speaker 74>There's no chad Mode is your ultimate natural pre workout

4621
04:19:36.559 --> 04:19:40.159
<v Speaker 74>designed to take your performance to the next level. Chad

4622
04:19:40.239 --> 04:19:43.959
<v Speaker 74>Mode is for natty beast. Alpha's only whether you're hitting

4623
04:19:44.000 --> 04:19:48.399
<v Speaker 74>the gym, invading a favella, conquering a small village, gambling,

4624
04:19:48.760 --> 04:19:52.639
<v Speaker 74>burning the midnight oil, logging on your coworkers, or getting

4625
04:19:52.680 --> 04:19:56.079
<v Speaker 74>banned from Facebook, chad Mode gives you the competitive edge

4626
04:19:56.120 --> 04:19:58.799
<v Speaker 74>you need. It's as simple as mixing one or two

4627
04:19:58.879 --> 04:20:02.440
<v Speaker 74>scoops of our fine paw into water or juice, providing

4628
04:20:02.520 --> 04:20:05.600
<v Speaker 74>you with a delicious, energizing beverage featuring a burst of

4629
04:20:05.799 --> 04:20:09.600
<v Speaker 74>sweet organic fruit flavor. Chad Mode will give you the

4630
04:20:09.680 --> 04:20:13.399
<v Speaker 74>extra edge you desperately crave. Chad Mode stands out from

4631
04:20:13.440 --> 04:20:18.559
<v Speaker 74>the crowd by excluding artificial flavors, preservatives, sweeteners, and dyes.

4632
04:20:19.239 --> 04:20:22.680
<v Speaker 74>We've even avoided so called natural flavors, ensuring a clean

4633
04:20:22.760 --> 04:20:26.319
<v Speaker 74>and effective formula. Only soy boys and Beta's guzzle, blue

4634
04:20:26.399 --> 04:20:30.479
<v Speaker 74>dye and sucralose further tanking, they're already low testosterone levels.

4635
04:20:31.040 --> 04:20:34.360
<v Speaker 74>Chad Mode is made in America. Unlike your common TikTok

4636
04:20:34.399 --> 04:20:37.879
<v Speaker 74>peasants pre workout powder, it does not contain Chinese lab

4637
04:20:37.959 --> 04:20:41.520
<v Speaker 74>made caffeine and artificial sweeteners that soyboys so often crave.

4638
04:20:42.399 --> 04:20:45.280
<v Speaker 74>Experience the pure goodness of chad Mode with Blue Magic

4639
04:20:45.399 --> 04:20:50.600
<v Speaker 74>registered trademark organic blue Spirillina extract, organic lemon cherry and

4640
04:20:50.760 --> 04:20:55.680
<v Speaker 74>organic maple crystals. Forget synthetic caffeine. Embrace the natural power

4641
04:20:55.760 --> 04:20:59.200
<v Speaker 74>of organic green coffee bean extract. Each dose of chad

4642
04:20:59.280 --> 04:21:01.399
<v Speaker 74>Mode mirrors the caffeine kick of a cup and a

4643
04:21:01.440 --> 04:21:06.159
<v Speaker 74>half of coffee, delivering a surge of energy. Alongside essential vitamins, minerals,

4644
04:21:06.319 --> 04:21:09.920
<v Speaker 74>amino acids, and herbal extracts. Chad Mode will allow you

4645
04:21:10.040 --> 04:21:12.879
<v Speaker 74>to fire your boss and mog on anyone who opposes you.

4646
04:21:13.680 --> 04:21:16.440
<v Speaker 74>Chad Mode will give you a dominant and aggressive edge,

4647
04:21:16.879 --> 04:21:19.440
<v Speaker 74>like a lion hunting a gazelle, where the gazelle is

4648
04:21:19.479 --> 04:21:23.239
<v Speaker 74>a TikTok Jim Zoomer macro guzzling sucralose on the daily

4649
04:21:23.840 --> 04:21:27.680
<v Speaker 74>edging to TNF videos. Whether you're seeking a high potency,

4650
04:21:27.840 --> 04:21:30.559
<v Speaker 74>junk free pre workout or a better way to kickstart

4651
04:21:30.600 --> 04:21:32.879
<v Speaker 74>your day, chad Mode has you covered.

4652
04:21:33.319 --> 04:21:45.879
<v Speaker 69>It's not just for men Chad, the Christians baptized is saints?

4653
04:21:46.040 --> 04:21:50.920
<v Speaker 18>Why because the word saint to set aside is something holy.

4654
04:21:54.239 --> 04:21:57.159
<v Speaker 18>But you mean there's not a different notion of the

4655
04:21:57.200 --> 04:22:02.000
<v Speaker 18>word say too within that the ones who finished the race,

4656
04:22:02.799 --> 04:22:06.559
<v Speaker 18>the ones who are theosis? Like why do why am

4657
04:22:06.600 --> 04:22:09.799
<v Speaker 18>I push into thinking that words just have one meaning?

4658
04:22:09.840 --> 04:22:13.479
<v Speaker 18>Which is exactly why they have obviously father can only

4659
04:22:13.559 --> 04:22:17.719
<v Speaker 18>have one meaning and call no man father, And I don't.

4660
04:22:17.559 --> 04:22:23.600
<v Speaker 75>Know exactly I'm gonna have some theories why why they

4661
04:22:24.040 --> 04:22:31.159
<v Speaker 75>struggle with this the idea that words could have multiple

4662
04:22:31.200 --> 04:22:36.079
<v Speaker 75>meanings in different contexts. But what's your thoughts perhaps on

4663
04:22:37.719 --> 04:22:41.399
<v Speaker 75>because I'm sure you've you've come across this. Words only

4664
04:22:41.479 --> 04:22:43.760
<v Speaker 75>have one meaning. It means this, it means the word

4665
04:22:43.840 --> 04:22:45.479
<v Speaker 75>means what it says, and it says what it means,

4666
04:22:45.520 --> 04:22:47.479
<v Speaker 75>and it means what I obviously, whatever I say, not

4667
04:22:47.559 --> 04:22:48.040
<v Speaker 75>what you say.

4668
04:22:51.319 --> 04:22:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, are you asking me? Yeah? I'm just curious.

4669
04:22:54.200 --> 04:22:54.440
<v Speaker 15>Yeah.

4670
04:22:55.200 --> 04:22:56.600
<v Speaker 2>I think mostly it's.

4671
04:22:56.559 --> 04:23:00.959
<v Speaker 26>Just due to like preconditioning and training from like Protestant

4672
04:23:01.079 --> 04:23:05.319
<v Speaker 26>churches who sort of espouse these things like when Jesus

4673
04:23:05.360 --> 04:23:08.000
<v Speaker 26>said to call no man father, he meant to call

4674
04:23:08.120 --> 04:23:10.120
<v Speaker 26>no man father, you know, And it's like, well, they

4675
04:23:10.280 --> 04:23:14.319
<v Speaker 26>make an exception for like your actual blood relative father,

4676
04:23:14.559 --> 04:23:18.239
<v Speaker 26>but other than that, you know, it's like some you know,

4677
04:23:18.479 --> 04:23:21.719
<v Speaker 26>sort of like dictation that he's making, like, oh, don't

4678
04:23:21.760 --> 04:23:24.840
<v Speaker 26>ever call anyone else father. So I don't know, I

4679
04:23:24.879 --> 04:23:27.559
<v Speaker 26>think it's just like I honestly think it's just due.

4680
04:23:27.440 --> 04:23:30.319
<v Speaker 18>To like bad training from Protestant There's another one that

4681
04:23:30.399 --> 04:23:34.200
<v Speaker 18>I found too, call no man Rocca fool.

4682
04:23:36.000 --> 04:23:38.079
<v Speaker 2>Bible says calls all kinds of people full.

4683
04:23:38.280 --> 04:23:40.959
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's a good example. Yeah, Solomon calls

4684
04:23:41.000 --> 04:23:41.440
<v Speaker 4>people fool.

4685
04:23:42.159 --> 04:23:46.799
<v Speaker 2>Rabbis Well, yeah, well I'm wondering too.

4686
04:23:48.559 --> 04:23:53.559
<v Speaker 18>So with the Reformers, you get kind of nominalism, and

4687
04:23:53.680 --> 04:23:57.959
<v Speaker 18>you've seen stuff like this, and I'm wondering, if you know,

4688
04:23:58.000 --> 04:23:59.959
<v Speaker 18>it's kind of I'm just speculating here, and it kind.

4689
04:23:59.879 --> 04:24:05.479
<v Speaker 2>Of keeper level. Do some of those philosophical errors perhaps

4690
04:24:05.639 --> 04:24:09.159
<v Speaker 2>condition influence them in a way to be conditioned to

4691
04:24:09.239 --> 04:24:11.040
<v Speaker 2>think of Well, obviously words just have one me.

4692
04:24:12.719 --> 04:24:16.639
<v Speaker 18>Because I believe in uniucacy and nominalism, and not that

4693
04:24:16.680 --> 04:24:18.879
<v Speaker 18>these people are actually conscious of that, but the Reformers

4694
04:24:18.959 --> 04:24:19.520
<v Speaker 18>definitely were.

4695
04:24:23.360 --> 04:24:25.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, good questions. I'm going to move on here.

4696
04:24:25.280 --> 04:24:30.000
<v Speaker 4>I appreciate that. So we're taking people who disagree tonight.

4697
04:24:30.120 --> 04:24:39.280
<v Speaker 4>So it's people who have arguments disagreements. Mark. By the way,

4698
04:24:39.319 --> 04:24:42.040
<v Speaker 4>here's the quote that Father Deacon was referring to. It's

4699
04:24:42.920 --> 04:24:47.319
<v Speaker 4>ignacious Epistle to the Simernians, and it is chapter eight,

4700
04:24:47.600 --> 04:24:49.440
<v Speaker 4>nothing to be done without the bishop. Where the bishop is,

4701
04:24:49.639 --> 04:24:54.920
<v Speaker 4>there's the Eucharist, there is the Catholic Church. Yes, it's

4702
04:24:55.000 --> 04:24:59.239
<v Speaker 4>exactly thing too, Mark, You and I'm mute.

4703
04:25:00.280 --> 04:25:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Can you hear me?

4704
04:25:01.280 --> 04:25:01.479
<v Speaker 8>Yeah?

4705
04:25:02.680 --> 04:25:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Thanks?

4706
04:25:03.840 --> 04:25:04.040
<v Speaker 35>Yeah.

4707
04:25:04.159 --> 04:25:04.680
<v Speaker 12>So I'm like.

4708
04:25:06.319 --> 04:25:11.280
<v Speaker 76>Like a Calvinistic, like Baptist kind of perspective, and I

4709
04:25:11.319 --> 04:25:13.319
<v Speaker 76>don't have like an argument per se, but I just

4710
04:25:13.440 --> 04:25:17.040
<v Speaker 76>kind of wanted to talk about like concupiscence.

4711
04:25:17.760 --> 04:25:22.200
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, just because basically, so, yeah, basically.

4712
04:25:21.879 --> 04:25:24.559
<v Speaker 76>I've been learning more about even just the Reformed and

4713
04:25:25.639 --> 04:25:29.639
<v Speaker 76>Lutheran understanding. I know there's even like some differences between

4714
04:25:29.680 --> 04:25:34.000
<v Speaker 76>different individuals and whatnot, But it seems like, at least

4715
04:25:35.319 --> 04:25:39.719
<v Speaker 76>from what I can surmise that for the main difference

4716
04:25:39.760 --> 04:25:43.479
<v Speaker 76>between the worth that the Worthodox position denies that concupisence

4717
04:25:43.639 --> 04:25:44.000
<v Speaker 76>is sin.

4718
04:25:44.200 --> 04:25:44.559
<v Speaker 2>Correct.

4719
04:25:44.760 --> 04:25:48.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, because James says that desire when it has given,

4720
04:25:48.159 --> 04:25:50.479
<v Speaker 4>when it is consented to, gives birth to sent So

4721
04:25:50.559 --> 04:25:53.360
<v Speaker 4>the desire is not the sin. The consenting to the

4722
04:25:54.040 --> 04:25:55.360
<v Speaker 4>passions is what the sin is?

4723
04:25:57.040 --> 04:25:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Right, Okay?

4724
04:25:57.959 --> 04:26:01.079
<v Speaker 76>And so then and then I so one thing that

4725
04:26:01.159 --> 04:26:04.479
<v Speaker 76>I'm wondering is like, is I mean I read though

4726
04:26:05.159 --> 04:26:07.920
<v Speaker 76>I actually have a copy of like the Orthodox Study Bible,

4727
04:26:08.799 --> 04:26:11.360
<v Speaker 76>and I was looking at the some of the passages

4728
04:26:11.399 --> 04:26:15.280
<v Speaker 76>on Roman seven. So I'm wondering, what is kind of

4729
04:26:15.360 --> 04:26:19.520
<v Speaker 76>what is the understanding of the language of indwelling sin.

4730
04:26:20.920 --> 04:26:23.799
<v Speaker 2>If it's not like you know, you're saying it's it's

4731
04:26:23.879 --> 04:26:24.120
<v Speaker 2>not it.

4732
04:26:24.559 --> 04:26:27.879
<v Speaker 4>So it can't be a literal thing that dwells because

4733
04:26:28.040 --> 04:26:31.159
<v Speaker 4>everything that has existence or being is created by God,

4734
04:26:31.319 --> 04:26:33.760
<v Speaker 4>and we know that God is not the creator of sin,

4735
04:26:34.280 --> 04:26:36.879
<v Speaker 4>because it would be the Manichean position to say that

4736
04:26:36.920 --> 04:26:39.120
<v Speaker 4>there's a substance or a thing that exists that is

4737
04:26:39.200 --> 04:26:43.079
<v Speaker 4>called sin. So it's a man It's actually a Manichean position, right.

4738
04:26:43.239 --> 04:26:46.399
<v Speaker 76>So yeah, And so one thing that I've seen is

4739
04:26:46.479 --> 04:26:48.559
<v Speaker 76>I've been studying more of the at least some of

4740
04:26:48.600 --> 04:26:51.879
<v Speaker 76>the Protestant people talking about it, is that they deny

4741
04:26:52.159 --> 04:26:55.559
<v Speaker 76>that position. Like in the Book of Conquered, for example,

4742
04:26:55.680 --> 04:26:59.120
<v Speaker 76>there's like a section about different like controversies that arose,

4743
04:26:59.200 --> 04:27:02.440
<v Speaker 76>and one of them, it's called the flaking controversy where

4744
04:27:02.479 --> 04:27:05.719
<v Speaker 76>the sky. Basically he was a Lutheran and he was

4745
04:27:05.879 --> 04:27:10.639
<v Speaker 76>articulating that position that you just explained that that humans

4746
04:27:11.040 --> 04:27:16.200
<v Speaker 76>in their substance are actually sinful and that you know,

4747
04:27:16.280 --> 04:27:18.360
<v Speaker 76>we're made in the image of Satan after the fall

4748
04:27:18.440 --> 04:27:21.559
<v Speaker 76>of crazy stuff, and that's like denied by the Lutherans.

4749
04:27:21.600 --> 04:27:23.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, but even if they deny that, that doesn't mean

4750
04:27:23.600 --> 04:27:25.879
<v Speaker 4>they're consistent because if you deny that, but then you

4751
04:27:25.920 --> 04:27:28.079
<v Speaker 4>think that there's this thing called a law of sin

4752
04:27:28.799 --> 04:27:32.520
<v Speaker 4>that's at work in you, then if then that means again,

4753
04:27:32.719 --> 04:27:34.840
<v Speaker 4>sin is still something that's part of your nature. How

4754
04:27:34.920 --> 04:27:36.600
<v Speaker 4>can sin be something that's in nature?

4755
04:27:37.520 --> 04:27:40.520
<v Speaker 76>Okay, okay, so kind of so am I So, just

4756
04:27:40.639 --> 04:27:43.879
<v Speaker 76>to clarify what you're saying, you're saying that even if

4757
04:27:43.959 --> 04:27:46.719
<v Speaker 76>they say that that they say it's just accidental, they're

4758
04:27:46.760 --> 04:27:49.399
<v Speaker 76>being inconsistent because of the way they talk about it.

4759
04:27:50.200 --> 04:27:51.239
<v Speaker 2>Is that kind of what you mean?

4760
04:27:51.399 --> 04:27:55.399
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean yeah, I mean conceivably any specific individual

4761
04:27:55.440 --> 04:27:58.920
<v Speaker 4>Protestant could have all manner positions. But in the case

4762
04:27:59.000 --> 04:28:03.479
<v Speaker 4>of Lutherans, I mean they understand their theology at times

4763
04:28:03.559 --> 04:28:06.559
<v Speaker 4>departs from Luther himself, because Luther said man is an

4764
04:28:06.639 --> 04:28:09.200
<v Speaker 4>ass that's ridden either by God or by the devil.

4765
04:28:09.799 --> 04:28:12.079
<v Speaker 4>If you read Bondage of the Will, Luther basically says

4766
04:28:12.159 --> 04:28:14.680
<v Speaker 4>that we're just basically sin machines. That's all we do

4767
04:28:14.840 --> 04:28:18.520
<v Speaker 4>is sin. It's even more radical than Calvin's told a

4768
04:28:18.600 --> 04:28:22.200
<v Speaker 4>privity position. So, I mean they can say one thing,

4769
04:28:22.360 --> 04:28:25.440
<v Speaker 4>but I think the key issue to refuting this is

4770
04:28:25.559 --> 04:28:28.079
<v Speaker 4>not so much worrying about like going into Roman seven

4771
04:28:28.200 --> 04:28:31.079
<v Speaker 4>or whatever, because Roman seven for us, as Paul, is

4772
04:28:31.200 --> 04:28:33.840
<v Speaker 4>using an analogy of something that's a law that's at

4773
04:28:33.879 --> 04:28:36.280
<v Speaker 4>work or a principle that's at work in my members,

4774
04:28:36.639 --> 04:28:40.799
<v Speaker 4>meaning that I have this tendency to go against God's

4775
04:28:40.879 --> 04:28:42.920
<v Speaker 4>law and to do things that are wrong. But that

4776
04:28:42.959 --> 04:28:45.639
<v Speaker 4>doesn't make my nature or my body bad. It just

4777
04:28:45.760 --> 04:28:48.879
<v Speaker 4>means that I have a tendency to commit an action

4778
04:28:49.079 --> 04:28:52.200
<v Speaker 4>of will that is a sin. For us, sin is

4779
04:28:52.280 --> 04:28:54.639
<v Speaker 4>not a state of being. It's not a thing. It's

4780
04:28:54.719 --> 04:28:56.959
<v Speaker 4>always an act of the will against the good or

4781
04:28:56.959 --> 04:28:59.120
<v Speaker 4>against God's law. That's all I can ever be. And

4782
04:28:59.200 --> 04:29:01.319
<v Speaker 4>so the Church Father's it's defined sin as somethody that's

4783
04:29:01.319 --> 04:29:04.079
<v Speaker 4>a privation. It's not a thing, because anything that has

4784
04:29:04.200 --> 04:29:07.319
<v Speaker 4>being or substance is something that God created. Our Nature's created.

4785
04:29:07.680 --> 04:29:10.200
<v Speaker 4>We have a being, we have substance, we have a will,

4786
04:29:10.280 --> 04:29:12.840
<v Speaker 4>we have desires, and God gave us those things so

4787
04:29:12.879 --> 04:29:15.479
<v Speaker 4>they could never inherently be sin. And I think that's

4788
04:29:15.520 --> 04:29:17.479
<v Speaker 4>the point that that we see sin as an action

4789
04:29:17.559 --> 04:29:18.680
<v Speaker 4>of the will and not a state of being.

4790
04:29:19.920 --> 04:29:26.399
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay, Yeah that makes sense. So yeah, okay.

4791
04:29:26.760 --> 04:29:29.559
<v Speaker 76>Another another thing that I was kind of curious about

4792
04:29:29.639 --> 04:29:33.680
<v Speaker 76>along the same lines or just trying to get understand more,

4793
04:29:33.840 --> 04:29:39.280
<v Speaker 76>is okay or yeah, basically I know you it's your

4794
04:29:39.319 --> 04:29:43.600
<v Speaker 76>guys view that that tendency to sin, even though it's

4795
04:29:43.719 --> 04:29:47.200
<v Speaker 76>not sin itself, it's not something that like inhres and

4796
04:29:47.840 --> 04:29:52.479
<v Speaker 76>in our substance for that proclivity to sin that happens

4797
04:29:52.559 --> 04:30:00.280
<v Speaker 76>because of the fall, right, yes, okay, okay, and so okay, yeah,

4798
04:30:00.319 --> 04:30:03.520
<v Speaker 76>that was just clarification I want, okay, So, and I

4799
04:30:03.639 --> 04:30:06.879
<v Speaker 76>know that it's your guy's position that you deny like

4800
04:30:07.000 --> 04:30:10.440
<v Speaker 76>any kind of imputed guilt from Adam correct.

4801
04:30:11.159 --> 04:30:14.639
<v Speaker 4>Right, guilt cannot be a state of being because guilt

4802
04:30:14.719 --> 04:30:17.920
<v Speaker 4>has only had through individual actions or what we call

4803
04:30:18.000 --> 04:30:20.360
<v Speaker 4>actual sins. So we agree with the Roman Catholics on

4804
04:30:20.440 --> 04:30:22.280
<v Speaker 4>this point that sin is an action of the will,

4805
04:30:22.360 --> 04:30:24.959
<v Speaker 4>is not a state of being. Okay, it could never

4806
04:30:25.000 --> 04:30:27.280
<v Speaker 4>be something that you inherit. In fact, that's why Ezekiel

4807
04:30:27.319 --> 04:30:29.200
<v Speaker 4>says that the sin the father should not be put

4808
04:30:29.239 --> 04:30:30.840
<v Speaker 4>to death for the sense the son should not be

4809
04:30:30.879 --> 04:30:31.920
<v Speaker 4>to put the death in sins of the father.

4810
04:30:32.760 --> 04:30:35.399
<v Speaker 76>Yeah, okay, And I wanted to bring up that Ezekiel

4811
04:30:35.680 --> 04:30:40.239
<v Speaker 76>eighteen passage because because I know that the Orthodox kind

4812
04:30:40.280 --> 04:30:44.879
<v Speaker 76>of talk more about death as like something that we

4813
04:30:45.000 --> 04:30:48.399
<v Speaker 76>all will die because of Adam sin, even though we're

4814
04:30:48.440 --> 04:30:50.600
<v Speaker 76>not all guilty because of Adam sin.

4815
04:30:50.840 --> 04:30:51.159
<v Speaker 4>Correct.

4816
04:30:51.760 --> 04:30:54.559
<v Speaker 77>But I guess what I'm wondering is, how does that

4817
04:30:54.879 --> 04:30:56.879
<v Speaker 77>if like the way that at least kind of going

4818
04:30:56.959 --> 04:30:59.719
<v Speaker 77>off that Ezekiel passage, it makes it seem as if

4819
04:30:59.799 --> 04:31:03.840
<v Speaker 77>like death is a penalty for people committing sin.

4820
04:31:04.600 --> 04:31:07.120
<v Speaker 2>So how do you understand the fact that everyone dies

4821
04:31:07.280 --> 04:31:08.840
<v Speaker 2>even though not everyone is guilty.

4822
04:31:09.200 --> 04:31:12.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, in the same way that if a mom has

4823
04:31:12.040 --> 04:31:16.000
<v Speaker 4>a child and she's you know, she drinks alcohol, the

4824
04:31:16.200 --> 04:31:18.879
<v Speaker 4>child hat well, it can be born with fetal alcohol syndrome,

4825
04:31:18.959 --> 04:31:20.920
<v Speaker 4>but he's not guilty of sin. So he has the

4826
04:31:21.000 --> 04:31:23.600
<v Speaker 4>consequences of the mother's sin, but that doesn't mean he's

4827
04:31:23.639 --> 04:31:25.639
<v Speaker 4>guilty for the action of the mom's sin. Even though

4828
04:31:25.639 --> 04:31:29.360
<v Speaker 4>he experiences the consequences. If somebody poisons my talent with

4829
04:31:29.520 --> 04:31:32.680
<v Speaker 4>fentanyl in the water and everybody becomes drug addicts, it's

4830
04:31:32.760 --> 04:31:35.239
<v Speaker 4>not their fault. They are not guilty of being drug

4831
04:31:35.239 --> 04:31:38.479
<v Speaker 4>addicts because someone because the effects of somebody's sins hit them.

4832
04:31:38.840 --> 04:31:41.440
<v Speaker 4>So in the same way, we feel the effects of

4833
04:31:41.479 --> 04:31:44.440
<v Speaker 4>adam sin, but we're not guilty for his sin. We

4834
04:31:44.520 --> 04:31:46.920
<v Speaker 4>are guilty for the sins that we individually commit. But

4835
04:31:47.879 --> 04:31:50.959
<v Speaker 4>great questions. I appreciate that we're going to move on

4836
04:31:51.159 --> 04:32:00.719
<v Speaker 4>to dominic if you want a full treatment of like

4837
04:32:00.760 --> 04:32:03.520
<v Speaker 4>the Protestant Calvinist position. Again, as we talked about earlier

4838
04:32:03.559 --> 04:32:06.760
<v Speaker 4>in Tonight's Dream, I did on my clips channel a

4839
04:32:06.840 --> 04:32:12.639
<v Speaker 4>really lengthy two part discussion with Sam Chamoun on Calvinism,

4840
04:32:12.719 --> 04:32:14.600
<v Speaker 4>and I did one with Church of the Eternal Logos

4841
04:32:14.680 --> 04:32:31.000
<v Speaker 4>on Calvinism. Go ahead, dominic dominic Cabralukay, Yeah, I'd like.

4842
04:32:31.079 --> 04:32:35.000
<v Speaker 2>To discuss free grace theology. Okay.

4843
04:32:35.120 --> 04:32:39.360
<v Speaker 41>So Roumins four is kind of contradicting James too, because

4844
04:32:39.440 --> 04:32:42.280
<v Speaker 41>you see it says if Abraham were justified by works,

4845
04:32:42.319 --> 04:32:44.760
<v Speaker 41>he had went off to glory, but not before God

4846
04:32:44.840 --> 04:32:46.079
<v Speaker 41>for what saved the scriptures.

4847
04:32:46.120 --> 04:32:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Abraham believed God.

4848
04:32:48.559 --> 04:32:50.639
<v Speaker 4>You're just why do you assume it's a contradiction. Maybe

4849
04:32:50.680 --> 04:32:52.319
<v Speaker 4>it's your interpretation that's wrong.

4850
04:32:53.399 --> 04:32:55.280
<v Speaker 2>But because it says on verse four and now to

4851
04:32:55.399 --> 04:32:56.920
<v Speaker 2>him that works there, So.

4852
04:32:56.920 --> 04:32:59.600
<v Speaker 4>It's your interpretation that's wrong. It's not a contradiction, it's

4853
04:32:59.600 --> 04:33:00.360
<v Speaker 4>your inter utation.

4854
04:33:03.079 --> 04:33:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

4855
04:33:03.680 --> 04:33:07.680
<v Speaker 41>I see what about Romans four or five that says

4856
04:33:07.799 --> 04:33:09.240
<v Speaker 41>the unrighteous.

4857
04:33:08.720 --> 04:33:09.360
<v Speaker 4>That count on.

4858
04:33:10.840 --> 04:33:14.520
<v Speaker 41>Don Jesus Christ will his faith is counted for righteousness.

4859
04:33:16.000 --> 04:33:18.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but faith, according to Paul, has to be living

4860
04:33:18.959 --> 04:33:21.880
<v Speaker 4>and active and working through love to count. So what

4861
04:33:22.080 --> 04:33:23.240
<v Speaker 4>kind of faith are you talking about?

4862
04:33:27.400 --> 04:33:30.520
<v Speaker 41>Well, I mean just basically a working faith that I

4863
04:33:31.040 --> 04:33:34.319
<v Speaker 41>would say is okay. So I would say the basis

4864
04:33:34.439 --> 04:33:37.520
<v Speaker 41>to be saved is at least having faith in Jesus Christ,

4865
04:33:38.200 --> 04:33:40.560
<v Speaker 41>because you know, everyone knows the Ephesians two a nine

4866
04:33:41.520 --> 04:33:42.360
<v Speaker 41>it says, you know, no.

4867
04:33:42.720 --> 04:33:44.599
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, But so all of this is right, But all

4868
04:33:44.639 --> 04:33:46.319
<v Speaker 4>of this is just based on the Protestant picking and

4869
04:33:46.439 --> 04:33:49.400
<v Speaker 4>choosing of certain verses to ignoring all the other verses.

4870
04:33:49.439 --> 04:33:51.720
<v Speaker 4>Where when I'm asking about what kind of faith, Paul says,

4871
04:33:51.959 --> 04:33:55.119
<v Speaker 4>faith worketh by love. That's what counts. The faith that

4872
04:33:55.279 --> 04:33:58.479
<v Speaker 4>is working. So it can't just be this mental rational

4873
04:33:58.599 --> 04:34:03.919
<v Speaker 4>notional faith, believing that you know, Jesus is the Savior,

4874
04:34:04.000 --> 04:34:06.720
<v Speaker 4>and he imputes grace to me like Protestants think. Because again,

4875
04:34:06.799 --> 04:34:09.560
<v Speaker 4>in many places, Paul specifies that his faith working. So

4876
04:34:10.159 --> 04:34:13.080
<v Speaker 4>Paul himself says, it's faith that works by love, which

4877
04:34:13.159 --> 04:34:15.319
<v Speaker 4>is exactly what James is saying. So it's not there's

4878
04:34:15.360 --> 04:34:18.040
<v Speaker 4>no contradiction. I'm mad. What's up?

4879
04:34:22.159 --> 04:34:25.279
<v Speaker 2>Hello? Can you hear me?

4880
04:34:25.959 --> 04:34:26.279
<v Speaker 4>I can't?

4881
04:34:27.360 --> 04:34:30.479
<v Speaker 78>All right, I just had a quick question regarding the Trinity.

4882
04:34:30.680 --> 04:34:35.520
<v Speaker 78>If that's okay with you? So Stovias Hippo when he

4883
04:34:35.599 --> 04:34:39.400
<v Speaker 78>says in on the Doctrine Book one, chapter five, at

4884
04:34:39.439 --> 04:34:40.680
<v Speaker 78>the Father and the Son.

4885
04:34:40.799 --> 04:34:44.200
<v Speaker 4>Cold on the Trinity or in Kridean on Christian Doctrine,

4886
04:34:44.200 --> 04:34:45.840
<v Speaker 4>which book are you satting on?

4887
04:34:45.919 --> 04:34:51.240
<v Speaker 79>The Christian doctor in Gridian on the on the Doctrine

4888
04:34:51.840 --> 04:34:56.279
<v Speaker 79>in Caridean, Yes, okay, go ahead.

4889
04:34:57.319 --> 04:34:59.040
<v Speaker 78>So when he says that the Father and the Son

4890
04:34:59.119 --> 04:35:02.520
<v Speaker 78>the Holy Spirit each at individually substance would just be

4891
04:35:02.639 --> 04:35:06.279
<v Speaker 78>talked about first substance or second substance, I.

4892
04:35:06.279 --> 04:35:08.159
<v Speaker 4>Don't know what you mean first or second substance. I

4893
04:35:08.200 --> 04:35:09.040
<v Speaker 4>don't know what you're talking about.

4894
04:35:09.360 --> 04:35:11.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So, like Arizona metaphysics, he puts the primary.

4895
04:35:11.759 --> 04:35:14.479
<v Speaker 4>Augustine is not going to be using Aristotelian metaphysics.

4896
04:35:15.400 --> 04:35:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so no, this is what it means. Going to

4897
04:35:17.959 --> 04:35:19.599
<v Speaker 2>hypothesis of three persons.

4898
04:35:19.880 --> 04:35:22.159
<v Speaker 4>He's not going to be using Aristotylian metaphysics.

4899
04:35:22.479 --> 04:35:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The metaphysics he's using, No, it's not.

4900
04:35:26.240 --> 04:35:29.360
<v Speaker 4>Okay, what is it based on platonism and neoplatonism?

4901
04:35:30.240 --> 04:35:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so tell me what this means? Three three companies?

4902
04:35:34.119 --> 04:35:36.159
<v Speaker 4>Hold on, Let me let me where I'm at the

4903
04:35:36.240 --> 04:35:37.240
<v Speaker 4>Encoreadian Which chapter?

4904
04:35:38.439 --> 04:35:41.799
<v Speaker 2>Uh, it's going to be book one, chapter five?

4905
04:35:48.840 --> 04:35:51.680
<v Speaker 4>Does it start moreover? The mind has been imbued with

4906
04:35:51.759 --> 04:35:54.840
<v Speaker 4>the first elements of faith? Is that what you're talking about? No,

4907
04:35:56.040 --> 04:35:57.439
<v Speaker 4>because you're talking about different work.

4908
04:35:58.599 --> 04:36:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's on the doc three. That's that's the work name.

4909
04:36:09.240 --> 04:36:09.880
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I got it.

4910
04:36:10.840 --> 04:36:14.520
<v Speaker 78>So would you name these three coupley substances would be concrete,

4911
04:36:14.560 --> 04:36:15.200
<v Speaker 78>dre abstract.

4912
04:36:17.880 --> 04:36:18.360
<v Speaker 8>Let me let me.

4913
04:36:18.479 --> 04:36:22.799
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to hold on. So chapter book one, Chapter five,

4914
04:36:22.880 --> 04:36:24.799
<v Speaker 4>The Trinity, the true object of enjoyment.

4915
04:36:26.360 --> 04:36:29.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm assuming it you should talk about ecept the three

4916
04:36:29.240 --> 04:36:31.919
<v Speaker 2>of them. They're try you. It goes about pyr coursis

4917
04:36:32.080 --> 04:36:33.240
<v Speaker 2>was about consequentiality?

4918
04:36:33.720 --> 04:36:36.520
<v Speaker 4>Does it? Does it begin? The true objects? Of enjoyment

4919
04:36:36.560 --> 04:36:37.919
<v Speaker 4>in our Father, son and Holy Spirit?

4920
04:36:38.000 --> 04:36:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Is that it? I'm pretty sure? I mean, do you

4921
04:36:43.080 --> 04:36:43.279
<v Speaker 2>have it?

4922
04:36:43.400 --> 04:36:44.200
<v Speaker 4>Or I don't understand?

4923
04:36:45.439 --> 04:36:48.439
<v Speaker 2>It's not with Marna, So it's care to ask you? Yeah?

4924
04:36:48.599 --> 04:36:51.439
<v Speaker 4>Ok, fair enough? Okay, so I have it pulled up.

4925
04:36:51.479 --> 04:36:52.319
<v Speaker 4>And then what's the question?

4926
04:36:53.000 --> 04:36:55.520
<v Speaker 78>Yes, I was asking, so the three the three couple

4927
04:36:55.520 --> 04:36:58.400
<v Speaker 78>of substances, right, so you know obviously some people can

4928
04:36:58.479 --> 04:37:01.159
<v Speaker 78>interpret diferent right, So I was wondering what the correct

4929
04:37:01.279 --> 04:37:04.319
<v Speaker 78>the pradition is like? Would it be concrete through substances

4930
04:37:04.560 --> 04:37:06.520
<v Speaker 78>or to be abstract through substances?

4931
04:37:07.520 --> 04:37:11.080
<v Speaker 4>It's neither one because that terminology isn't applicable to the trinity.

4932
04:37:11.520 --> 04:37:14.599
<v Speaker 4>There are three hypostases with one essence, so that it

4933
04:37:14.639 --> 04:37:16.520
<v Speaker 4>has nothing to do with abstract or concrete.

4934
04:37:16.959 --> 04:37:20.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, are you with what concrete is? In?

4935
04:37:21.159 --> 04:37:24.360
<v Speaker 4>Whose philosophy? You keep asking about Aristotle? And Augustine is.

4936
04:37:24.360 --> 04:37:27.479
<v Speaker 2>Not influenced by the basic is the basic categorism met

4937
04:37:27.479 --> 04:37:30.400
<v Speaker 2>pphysics of who of Aristotle?

4938
04:37:30.720 --> 04:37:33.080
<v Speaker 4>Why do you keep asking Aristotal questions when he's not

4939
04:37:33.400 --> 04:37:35.119
<v Speaker 4>influenced by Aristotle and.

4940
04:37:35.200 --> 04:37:38.119
<v Speaker 2>The Plato and Ariosota they complement each other, for.

4941
04:37:38.119 --> 04:37:40.560
<v Speaker 4>Example, but Augustine is not influenced by Aristotle. So it

4942
04:37:40.599 --> 04:37:43.919
<v Speaker 4>has nothing to do with that. You said, that's hypostasis

4943
04:37:44.040 --> 04:37:48.080
<v Speaker 4>in Christian theology, is not. The closest equivalent is Aristotle's

4944
04:37:48.080 --> 04:37:50.479
<v Speaker 4>notion of the individual the agent.

4945
04:37:51.599 --> 04:37:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so the agent. So we see the three hypotheses,

4946
04:37:55.119 --> 04:37:56.360
<v Speaker 2>the unified to one agent.

4947
04:37:56.279 --> 04:38:00.000
<v Speaker 4>Or no, three agents with one essence.

4948
04:38:00.599 --> 04:38:02.720
<v Speaker 78>Three agents, one essence. And would you say that your

4949
04:38:02.759 --> 04:38:06.599
<v Speaker 78>God's peer act. No, you wouldn't say about peer act.

4950
04:38:07.000 --> 04:38:09.200
<v Speaker 4>Now we're not a Riskitilians like, so you're trying to

4951
04:38:09.720 --> 04:38:11.880
<v Speaker 4>Are you a Muslim that's trying to understand this stuff?

4952
04:38:13.360 --> 04:38:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

4953
04:38:14.639 --> 04:38:16.720
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so but you have no idea what you're dealing with.

4954
04:38:16.840 --> 04:38:19.479
<v Speaker 4>You're trying to import these ideas from systems that you

4955
04:38:20.080 --> 04:38:22.599
<v Speaker 4>have nothing to do with what Augustin is talking about.

4956
04:38:22.720 --> 04:38:24.799
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, I'm an only ext Christian went to

4957
04:38:25.759 --> 04:38:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Christian academy.

4958
04:38:26.599 --> 04:38:29.520
<v Speaker 4>So that doesn't mean you know what you're talking about

4959
04:38:29.560 --> 04:38:32.759
<v Speaker 4>because you went to a Christian academy for sure. So

4960
04:38:32.919 --> 04:38:34.599
<v Speaker 4>well then if you knew, if you knew Christian, then

4961
04:38:34.599 --> 04:38:36.639
<v Speaker 4>you would know that that Orthodox are not going to

4962
04:38:36.680 --> 04:38:37.439
<v Speaker 4>say God's.

4963
04:38:38.680 --> 04:38:42.400
<v Speaker 78>You hold a Parlemist rights. So in chapter seven Deeds

4964
04:38:42.439 --> 04:38:44.000
<v Speaker 78>of the Hunt of the chapters, we said that God

4965
04:38:44.080 --> 04:38:45.919
<v Speaker 78>is in natural beings. I mean, that's his energy. The

4966
04:38:46.000 --> 04:38:48.040
<v Speaker 78>mythics would be slow down.

4967
04:38:48.040 --> 04:38:50.279
<v Speaker 4>I've read one hundred fifty chapters. What slow down? What

4968
04:38:50.360 --> 04:38:50.680
<v Speaker 4>are you say?

4969
04:38:51.200 --> 04:38:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Chapter seventy eight, what about you the chapters?

4970
04:38:54.200 --> 04:38:57.520
<v Speaker 78>He says that God I mean is mythics because the

4971
04:38:57.720 --> 04:38:59.520
<v Speaker 78>energy can be normally referred as to God as well.

4972
04:39:00.159 --> 04:39:04.799
<v Speaker 78>God is the nature of all beings, meaning that's his operations.

4973
04:39:05.040 --> 04:39:09.720
<v Speaker 78>Is nature, and just obviously Tellio's nature, he substantial nature,

4974
04:39:10.200 --> 04:39:10.840
<v Speaker 78>essential nature.

4975
04:39:11.000 --> 04:39:13.080
<v Speaker 4>To slow down and stop trying to play word games.

4976
04:39:14.000 --> 04:39:14.919
<v Speaker 2>Is games.

4977
04:39:16.479 --> 04:39:18.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm pulling up one hundred fifty chapters and you're reading

4978
04:39:18.439 --> 04:39:19.000
<v Speaker 4>it super fast.

4979
04:39:19.040 --> 04:39:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Which one chapter seventy sir?

4980
04:39:22.880 --> 04:39:32.119
<v Speaker 4>What seventy eight? Yes, sir, God's nature is utterly remote.

4981
04:39:32.159 --> 04:39:34.400
<v Speaker 4>This is talking about apathetic theology. So what's your point?

4982
04:39:35.040 --> 04:39:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so so you go to apathetic theology, right, and

4983
04:39:37.200 --> 04:39:38.799
<v Speaker 2>so with God is a nature of all beings.

4984
04:39:39.439 --> 04:39:41.040
<v Speaker 4>God is not the nature of beings. So you have

4985
04:39:41.080 --> 04:39:43.240
<v Speaker 4>no idea what you're talking about. You know, we're not pantheus.

4986
04:39:43.319 --> 04:39:47.880
<v Speaker 4>No he's not. No, he's not the uncreated nature is

4987
04:39:47.959 --> 04:39:49.720
<v Speaker 4>not the nature of created beings.

4988
04:39:50.200 --> 04:39:52.680
<v Speaker 2>J He says in chapter seventy I have it in

4989
04:39:52.720 --> 04:39:53.119
<v Speaker 2>front of me.

4990
04:39:53.840 --> 04:39:56.919
<v Speaker 4>It's talking about God's uncreated nature, which is not the

4991
04:39:57.000 --> 04:40:00.840
<v Speaker 4>nature of created beings. No, no orthodoxy thedox person believes that.

4992
04:40:00.919 --> 04:40:03.759
<v Speaker 4>That's ridiculous. Why are you saying this? You think we

4993
04:40:03.799 --> 04:40:04.880
<v Speaker 4>don't know our own theology?

4994
04:40:05.560 --> 04:40:08.919
<v Speaker 78>No, No, greg good pelancy obviously offer Koreish exideal if

4995
04:40:08.959 --> 04:40:12.119
<v Speaker 78>you see that teleological nature of God's identical to all

4996
04:40:12.200 --> 04:40:13.279
<v Speaker 78>beings of nature.

4997
04:40:13.200 --> 04:40:15.959
<v Speaker 4>No, it's not the nature of God is not the

4998
04:40:16.520 --> 04:40:17.560
<v Speaker 4>nature of created beings.

4999
04:40:17.799 --> 04:40:19.959
<v Speaker 2>Hey, do you have the crew translation I have?

5000
04:40:20.599 --> 04:40:22.840
<v Speaker 4>Like you know, you don't know the correct You're a Muslim?

5001
04:40:22.919 --> 04:40:25.840
<v Speaker 4>What are you talking about? I have it in front

5002
04:40:25.880 --> 04:40:26.439
<v Speaker 4>of me right here.

5003
04:40:27.240 --> 04:40:30.639
<v Speaker 2>Listen, I'm a Muslim, but I but you have no idea?

5004
04:40:30.680 --> 04:40:32.919
<v Speaker 4>What Christian do you think? The Christian theology teaches that

5005
04:40:33.000 --> 04:40:35.200
<v Speaker 4>God's nature is the nature of creative beings.

5006
04:40:35.240 --> 04:40:36.720
<v Speaker 2>It's not what I'm teaching.

5007
04:40:38.119 --> 04:40:39.759
<v Speaker 4>I have it in front of me. He does not

5008
04:40:39.919 --> 04:40:43.799
<v Speaker 4>say that as well. Well, but yeah, but you guys

5009
04:40:43.919 --> 04:40:47.479
<v Speaker 4>are commit takia and lie. So that's that's not what

5010
04:40:47.599 --> 04:40:48.200
<v Speaker 4>he says.

5011
04:40:49.479 --> 04:40:56.680
<v Speaker 2>As I committed correct as who holds I do?

5012
04:40:57.200 --> 04:41:00.919
<v Speaker 4>Here we go with the Arabic bullshitting out the Arabic

5013
04:41:01.040 --> 04:41:03.319
<v Speaker 4>term then nobody that doesn't impress of anybody over here.

5014
04:41:03.599 --> 04:41:05.439
<v Speaker 4>We don't care that you spin out Arabic terms.

5015
04:41:06.080 --> 04:41:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, sir, but you hold to antitosis. Correct.

5016
04:41:11.560 --> 04:41:14.520
<v Speaker 4>Every nature is utterly remote and absolutely estranged from the

5017
04:41:14.560 --> 04:41:17.680
<v Speaker 4>divine nature. The very first sentence in this paragraph refutes

5018
04:41:17.720 --> 04:41:18.919
<v Speaker 4>this idiocy of what you're saying.

5019
04:41:19.759 --> 04:41:25.840
<v Speaker 78>Okay, okay, so okay, yeah, So if you go down,

5020
04:41:26.000 --> 04:41:27.680
<v Speaker 78>he says, this too is a wisdom of goodness. And

5021
04:41:27.720 --> 04:41:30.240
<v Speaker 78>simply all the erycip of God or of God will

5022
04:41:30.479 --> 04:41:33.840
<v Speaker 78>also the saint's falling theology. And since the God also

5023
04:41:33.959 --> 04:41:35.479
<v Speaker 78>called the nature all of beings as.

5024
04:41:35.360 --> 04:41:37.880
<v Speaker 2>He of all that you partake in the methics.

5025
04:41:37.599 --> 04:41:40.240
<v Speaker 4>Of it is, you're not you're you're not even you're

5026
04:41:40.279 --> 04:41:44.439
<v Speaker 4>not even reading it. You're like spitting your It says

5027
04:41:44.479 --> 04:41:46.639
<v Speaker 4>he is the very listen. It says, he is the

5028
04:41:46.840 --> 04:41:50.000
<v Speaker 4>very being of beings, and the form in the forms

5029
04:41:50.159 --> 04:41:52.040
<v Speaker 4>as the primal form in the wisdom. That means he's

5030
04:41:52.080 --> 04:41:54.599
<v Speaker 4>the source and the archetype of the created or order.

5031
04:41:55.720 --> 04:41:58.720
<v Speaker 2>So is essence identical to nature linguistically?

5032
04:41:59.520 --> 04:42:05.319
<v Speaker 80>Yes, okay, so God's essence is the same as his nature.

5033
04:42:06.799 --> 04:42:10.319
<v Speaker 80>I never asked you just asked me if it was

5034
04:42:10.360 --> 04:42:10.599
<v Speaker 80>the same.

5035
04:42:10.680 --> 04:42:12.279
<v Speaker 4>What do you mean You never asked so, So.

5036
04:42:12.720 --> 04:42:16.400
<v Speaker 2>It's telos identical to essence teleos.

5037
04:42:16.599 --> 04:42:19.319
<v Speaker 4>That's purpose, dude, what are you talking about? No, purpose

5038
04:42:19.439 --> 04:42:20.720
<v Speaker 4>is not nature, dummy.

5039
04:42:21.080 --> 04:42:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes, telogical nature tilos.

5040
04:42:25.400 --> 04:42:26.919
<v Speaker 4>No, you don't even know. There's no such thing as

5041
04:42:26.959 --> 04:42:32.159
<v Speaker 4>teleos teleological nature. Tilos is purpose. No, there's not. You

5042
04:42:32.200 --> 04:42:34.159
<v Speaker 4>don't even. You don't know these terms, dude, You have

5043
04:42:34.240 --> 04:42:37.319
<v Speaker 4>no idea what you're talking about. What do you think?

5044
04:42:37.959 --> 04:42:40.200
<v Speaker 4>Do you listen? Listen to me, I'm telling you are theology.

5045
04:42:40.400 --> 04:42:42.799
<v Speaker 4>Telos is purpose. It's not a nature.

5046
04:42:43.959 --> 04:42:46.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's not a nature. Nobody said it's a nature.

5047
04:42:46.159 --> 04:42:48.560
<v Speaker 4>You just said teleological nature.

5048
04:42:49.720 --> 04:42:53.439
<v Speaker 2>Teleological nature. You just said that actual purpose.

5049
04:42:54.279 --> 04:42:58.520
<v Speaker 4>There's are you not teleos? You don't even you're not

5050
04:42:58.560 --> 04:43:03.080
<v Speaker 4>even saying it right. Oh man, God's nature is not

5051
04:43:03.240 --> 04:43:04.680
<v Speaker 4>a teleological nature.

5052
04:43:05.040 --> 04:43:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay.

5053
04:43:08.080 --> 04:43:13.279
<v Speaker 4>Seventy eight verse, The very first sentence says, the very

5054
04:43:13.360 --> 04:43:16.200
<v Speaker 4>first sentence, the very first sentence says that you're lying

5055
04:43:16.319 --> 04:43:18.639
<v Speaker 4>about all this passage. You're lying? Why are you lying

5056
04:43:18.639 --> 04:43:19.200
<v Speaker 4>about this past?

5057
04:43:19.279 --> 04:43:19.319
<v Speaker 10>Like?

5058
04:43:19.360 --> 04:43:19.880
<v Speaker 2>What do you like?

5059
04:43:21.159 --> 04:43:24.000
<v Speaker 4>Who told you this? So your your control f searching?

5060
04:43:24.080 --> 04:43:27.840
<v Speaker 4>You haven't actually read this word? Yeah, it's in front

5061
04:43:27.840 --> 04:43:31.040
<v Speaker 4>of everybody. It doesn't say that God's nature is created nature.

5062
04:43:31.200 --> 04:43:33.319
<v Speaker 4>It says the very first sentence says the opposite of that,

5063
04:43:34.040 --> 04:43:35.279
<v Speaker 4>I don't care what you have in front of you.

5064
04:43:36.919 --> 04:43:37.119
<v Speaker 2>The what.

5065
04:43:38.919 --> 04:43:40.599
<v Speaker 4>Nobody cares what you have in front of you?

5066
04:43:41.439 --> 04:43:42.639
<v Speaker 2>All right, sir, sir?

5067
04:43:43.279 --> 04:43:44.439
<v Speaker 35>Question sir, sir?

5068
04:43:46.639 --> 04:43:49.599
<v Speaker 2>So so your correct obviously.

5069
04:43:52.759 --> 04:43:55.200
<v Speaker 4>Is so this is the dumbest like, so is this

5070
04:43:55.360 --> 04:43:57.520
<v Speaker 4>your new plan of attack? But let's talk about Islam first.

5071
04:43:57.560 --> 04:44:00.279
<v Speaker 4>You want to talk about Islam? You just want wanna

5072
04:44:00.520 --> 04:44:02.560
<v Speaker 4>You want to go through text that you don't even understand.

5073
04:44:02.560 --> 04:44:06.639
<v Speaker 4>You don't want me to talk about as long? Now wait, sir, wait, sir, wait, sir?

5074
04:44:08.799 --> 04:44:12.479
<v Speaker 4>Does it say yeah, I know it like I don't

5075
04:44:12.520 --> 04:44:16.119
<v Speaker 4>know Calciton. Yeah, he is not nature because he is

5076
04:44:16.200 --> 04:44:20.240
<v Speaker 4>beyond all nature. Do you see that you just said

5077
04:44:20.240 --> 04:44:21.680
<v Speaker 4>he you just said he has nature.

5078
04:44:22.799 --> 04:44:24.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm on my phone. I can't see your life stream,

5079
04:44:24.479 --> 04:44:25.279
<v Speaker 2>but I have the skin right here.

5080
04:44:25.400 --> 04:44:26.799
<v Speaker 4>I'm reading. I don't want to talk about the skin.

5081
04:44:26.919 --> 04:44:28.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm reading it to you right here.

5082
04:44:28.560 --> 04:44:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Translation, Sahi, you.

5083
04:44:34.560 --> 04:44:36.159
<v Speaker 4>You think these are these are hot deeths?

5084
04:44:37.639 --> 04:44:38.119
<v Speaker 15>How do you know?

5085
04:44:38.200 --> 04:44:40.240
<v Speaker 4>You don't you don't know our theology? How do you

5086
04:44:40.319 --> 04:44:42.720
<v Speaker 4>know you have the right translation. I'm I'm at a

5087
04:44:42.759 --> 04:44:46.319
<v Speaker 4>freaking Orthodox website. What are you talking about. We're not

5088
04:44:46.360 --> 04:44:49.159
<v Speaker 4>gonna listen to you lying Muslims about our palam Mos.

5089
04:44:49.240 --> 04:44:51.360
<v Speaker 4>Come on, hi, sir.

5090
04:44:51.599 --> 04:44:53.560
<v Speaker 2>So I just wanted to ask you a quick You're

5091
04:44:53.599 --> 04:44:54.080
<v Speaker 2>just trolling.

5092
04:44:54.200 --> 04:44:56.319
<v Speaker 4>You're a lying troll. Give me, give me a break.

5093
04:44:56.319 --> 04:44:57.119
<v Speaker 4>You're a lying troll.

5094
04:44:58.119 --> 04:44:58.799
<v Speaker 2>No, don't kick me.

5095
04:44:59.240 --> 04:45:01.200
<v Speaker 4>You want to qush to You don't want to just

5096
04:45:01.240 --> 04:45:03.520
<v Speaker 4>ask questions. You came here to lie. So you didn't

5097
04:45:03.599 --> 04:45:07.279
<v Speaker 4>know what you thought as you thought Augustine wasn't Aristotilian.

5098
04:45:07.439 --> 04:45:10.720
<v Speaker 4>You thought Augusta wasn't Aristotilian first, and now you're saying

5099
04:45:10.759 --> 04:45:13.000
<v Speaker 4>that you thought that you thought Gregory Palamas says that

5100
04:45:13.080 --> 04:45:15.080
<v Speaker 4>God's nature is the nature of all creation?

5101
04:45:16.360 --> 04:45:18.400
<v Speaker 2>All right? Did do you hold a physicism? Sir?

5102
04:45:18.720 --> 04:45:19.080
<v Speaker 4>Of course?

5103
04:45:20.720 --> 04:45:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So why you say that you didn't You didn't

5104
04:45:23.520 --> 04:45:24.119
<v Speaker 2>know what that was.

5105
04:45:24.680 --> 04:45:26.040
<v Speaker 4>I didn't say I didn't know what that was. It

5106
04:45:26.119 --> 04:45:28.599
<v Speaker 4>means two nature's uh huh?

5107
04:45:29.119 --> 04:45:33.439
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so you holted it. Of course.

5108
04:45:33.479 --> 04:45:36.319
<v Speaker 4>Saint Cyril teaches the communication of properties. Every Orthodox person

5109
04:45:36.360 --> 04:45:36.720
<v Speaker 4>believes that.

5110
04:45:37.400 --> 04:45:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but that's Western theology.

5111
04:45:39.279 --> 04:45:41.680
<v Speaker 4>No, it's not. It's from Saint Cyril, You retard. St.

5112
04:45:41.720 --> 04:45:46.319
<v Speaker 4>Cyril is not a Western theologian. It's from Cyril. You

5113
04:45:46.400 --> 04:45:48.840
<v Speaker 4>said it's Western theology, so you have no idea what

5114
04:45:48.919 --> 04:45:49.639
<v Speaker 4>you're talking about?

5115
04:45:50.400 --> 04:45:52.639
<v Speaker 2>Are you saints of Eastern.

5116
04:45:55.319 --> 04:46:03.759
<v Speaker 4>It's the stupidest shit I've ever heard, Dave Saint Cyril

5117
04:46:03.840 --> 04:46:08.680
<v Speaker 4>of Western theology. Please clip that. That's the stupidest Muslim

5118
04:46:08.680 --> 04:46:11.599
<v Speaker 4>ever who thought he was being sophisticated and smart by

5119
04:46:11.680 --> 04:46:13.720
<v Speaker 4>talking fast and spitting out a bunch of terms that

5120
04:46:13.799 --> 04:46:15.319
<v Speaker 4>he thought I didn't know, Like I didn't know what

5121
04:46:15.400 --> 04:46:18.360
<v Speaker 4>community castio modius. Did we lecture through Cyril over here?

5122
04:46:19.240 --> 04:46:22.439
<v Speaker 4>Like we've debated the Orientals? You think I've read tons

5123
04:46:22.479 --> 04:46:24.080
<v Speaker 4>of Cyril? What are you talking about?

5124
04:46:24.479 --> 04:46:27.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm you, hey, Ja, what's up?

5125
04:46:30.319 --> 04:46:30.720
<v Speaker 4>What's up?

5126
04:46:32.959 --> 04:46:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Hey? Hey? I was just gonna ask a question.

5127
04:46:36.000 --> 04:46:40.720
<v Speaker 58>Maybe disagreement, I don't know, But what's the Orthodox view

5128
04:46:40.799 --> 04:46:42.479
<v Speaker 58>on libertarian free will?

5129
04:46:43.040 --> 04:46:44.319
<v Speaker 2>Would would you say? We hope to that?

5130
04:46:47.000 --> 04:46:49.959
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we believe in the Patristic sense of free will?

5131
04:46:50.080 --> 04:46:53.119
<v Speaker 4>So I don't know if that translates to quote libertarian

5132
04:46:53.200 --> 04:46:56.040
<v Speaker 4>free will and some Enlightenment model.

5133
04:46:57.279 --> 04:47:02.759
<v Speaker 2>Okay, what about so mean? And I've heard that the Patristic.

5134
04:47:04.159 --> 04:47:05.919
<v Speaker 58>Version of free will is the idea that you can

5135
04:47:06.159 --> 04:47:07.599
<v Speaker 58>choose between multiple goods?

5136
04:47:07.720 --> 04:47:08.200
<v Speaker 2>Is that greg?

5137
04:47:10.119 --> 04:47:13.919
<v Speaker 4>I mean, that's the argument of Saint Maximus about the

5138
04:47:14.080 --> 04:47:18.240
<v Speaker 4>Escaton for why free will is not a something that's

5139
04:47:18.759 --> 04:47:20.040
<v Speaker 4>just about the fallen state.

5140
04:47:21.200 --> 04:47:23.880
<v Speaker 58>What do you think about the argument that free will

5141
04:47:23.959 --> 04:47:26.560
<v Speaker 58>seems to entail, or at least the ability that our

5142
04:47:26.599 --> 04:47:31.119
<v Speaker 58>actions needed can for our actions to be morally praiseworthy,

5143
04:47:31.639 --> 04:47:34.759
<v Speaker 58>that you need to be able to choose between good

5144
04:47:34.799 --> 04:47:35.240
<v Speaker 58>and evil.

5145
04:47:40.119 --> 04:47:43.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure that it's necessary, because Adam and Eve

5146
04:47:43.759 --> 04:47:47.639
<v Speaker 4>could have continued in a state of innocence without evil

5147
04:47:48.360 --> 04:47:50.360
<v Speaker 4>and been virtuous.

5148
04:47:52.000 --> 04:47:54.000
<v Speaker 2>But they still would have had the choice.

5149
04:47:54.720 --> 04:47:59.000
<v Speaker 58>That's kind of the point, Like the choice of choosing

5150
04:47:59.159 --> 04:48:00.599
<v Speaker 58>a path heath.

5151
04:48:00.479 --> 04:48:03.400
<v Speaker 4>Of evil is no, But I'm saying that. I'm saying

5152
04:48:03.479 --> 04:48:05.639
<v Speaker 4>that even if they had not had the option or

5153
04:48:05.680 --> 04:48:08.520
<v Speaker 4>the ability to choose evil, there could still be virtue,

5154
04:48:08.560 --> 04:48:12.880
<v Speaker 4>and there would there would still be the good because

5155
04:48:12.919 --> 04:48:15.880
<v Speaker 4>there won't be the possibility of choosing evil in the Esketon,

5156
04:48:15.959 --> 04:48:17.880
<v Speaker 4>So it has to be connected to multiple goods.

5157
04:48:19.240 --> 04:48:21.400
<v Speaker 2>You don't think that that possibility will be there.

5158
04:48:22.360 --> 04:48:27.279
<v Speaker 4>In the Escaton. Yeah, No, that's totally heretical. How would

5159
04:48:27.279 --> 04:48:28.439
<v Speaker 4>there be evil in the Escton.

5160
04:48:30.279 --> 04:48:35.200
<v Speaker 58>Well, the explanation I've heard primarily, you know, and I'm getting.

5161
04:48:35.040 --> 04:48:38.159
<v Speaker 35>This primarily from prose, since scholars all admit is that

5162
04:48:38.880 --> 04:48:40.439
<v Speaker 35>you're the you have a.

5163
04:48:40.439 --> 04:48:43.439
<v Speaker 2>Certain kind of character, character character.

5164
04:48:43.599 --> 04:48:45.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the Bible is very clear that there's no

5165
04:48:45.279 --> 04:48:47.720
<v Speaker 4>evil in the escton. God will be all in all

5166
04:48:48.200 --> 04:48:49.639
<v Speaker 4>death and hades are destroyed.

5167
04:48:49.680 --> 04:48:53.159
<v Speaker 58>There's no evil, right, but there would just be no evil,

5168
04:48:53.200 --> 04:48:55.759
<v Speaker 58>but there would still be the potential basically.

5169
04:48:56.680 --> 04:48:57.560
<v Speaker 2>In the same way that you.

5170
04:48:57.599 --> 04:49:01.240
<v Speaker 58>Said, like, you know, how there is a difference between

5171
04:49:01.279 --> 04:49:05.279
<v Speaker 58>something being potential and actualizing you know.

5172
04:49:06.080 --> 04:49:08.639
<v Speaker 4>The Well, no, there's no potential for evil. And the

5173
04:49:08.720 --> 04:49:10.759
<v Speaker 4>reason that there's still free will is that free will

5174
04:49:10.880 --> 04:49:13.080
<v Speaker 4>is not a choice between good and evil. That's the

5175
04:49:13.200 --> 04:49:15.799
<v Speaker 4>fallen mode of willing. Free will is a choice between

5176
04:49:15.840 --> 04:49:18.680
<v Speaker 4>multiple goods. That's this is Maximus's whole argument against people

5177
04:49:18.759 --> 04:49:19.159
<v Speaker 4>like Origin.

5178
04:49:20.119 --> 04:49:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I thought that was interesting because I know that

5179
04:49:24.159 --> 04:49:26.639
<v Speaker 2>a common rebuttal to that is God, you know, that

5180
04:49:26.680 --> 04:49:30.599
<v Speaker 2>would make God not possess free will. So I was

5181
04:49:30.680 --> 04:49:32.080
<v Speaker 2>just kind of curious.

5182
04:49:32.919 --> 04:49:35.479
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly, that's that's another way to Yeah, that's another

5183
04:49:35.520 --> 04:49:39.159
<v Speaker 4>way to argue it. And also, if you read free

5184
04:49:39.240 --> 04:49:43.479
<v Speaker 4>choice in Saint Maximus, Chapter five discusses this whole issue.

5185
04:49:43.560 --> 04:49:47.479
<v Speaker 4>I think very well from Saint Maximus. Okay, yeah, and

5186
04:49:47.560 --> 04:50:00.279
<v Speaker 4>that's online. You can find that very easily, are you.

5187
04:50:15.159 --> 04:50:18.360
<v Speaker 4>Here's a smart man dark plus seventy seven to one dollar.

5188
04:50:19.680 --> 04:50:22.520
<v Speaker 4>If any man wants to follow me, I will be there.

5189
04:50:22.599 --> 04:50:24.799
<v Speaker 4>They will be my servant. If any man serve me,

5190
04:50:25.200 --> 04:50:28.599
<v Speaker 4>he will honor my father. KJV Bible believing Christian don't

5191
04:50:28.599 --> 04:50:32.479
<v Speaker 4>follow men like you do, Ring Kisser. Hey, you're just

5192
04:50:32.560 --> 04:50:36.000
<v Speaker 4>an idiot. So there's even sillier review to give me

5193
04:50:36.080 --> 04:50:40.279
<v Speaker 4>a dollar agent zero five dollars Boomer Hillsdale College professor impersonation.

5194
04:50:40.400 --> 04:50:41.840
<v Speaker 4>But wait, what does a serpent do that?

5195
04:50:42.000 --> 04:50:42.319
<v Speaker 7>What is it?

5196
04:50:42.360 --> 04:50:46.639
<v Speaker 4>Because that's what it's like, what a serpent does by you?

5197
04:50:46.759 --> 04:50:47.040
<v Speaker 2>What's up?

5198
04:50:54.520 --> 04:50:54.720
<v Speaker 27>Yes?

5199
04:50:54.919 --> 04:51:00.479
<v Speaker 81>Do you think that the Epistle of Barnabas was written

5200
04:51:00.639 --> 04:51:04.080
<v Speaker 81>by the Barnabas in the New Testament.

5201
04:51:05.400 --> 04:51:07.319
<v Speaker 4>I don't have any hard position on that.

5202
04:51:07.560 --> 04:51:14.319
<v Speaker 82>It's possible, okay, because I had heard that orthodox fold

5203
04:51:14.400 --> 04:51:18.840
<v Speaker 82>that the Epistle of Barnabas is an authoritative, authentic text.

5204
04:51:19.639 --> 04:51:21.959
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's not in the canon scripture, but it

5205
04:51:22.119 --> 04:51:23.959
<v Speaker 4>might be from Barnabas.

5206
04:51:26.080 --> 04:51:27.919
<v Speaker 2>It might be from what it might be.

5207
04:51:27.959 --> 04:51:29.959
<v Speaker 4>From Barnabas, but that doesn't make it part of the

5208
04:51:30.040 --> 04:51:33.680
<v Speaker 4>Canona Scripture. Okay, I mean, I got.

5209
04:51:33.759 --> 04:51:37.799
<v Speaker 2>I thought that it might have been, so really question about.

5210
04:51:37.560 --> 04:51:41.080
<v Speaker 4>It because ideas, Yeah, I think it does. It does,

5211
04:51:41.279 --> 04:51:44.560
<v Speaker 4>and that's why probably why I didn't make it into

5212
04:51:44.599 --> 04:51:45.000
<v Speaker 4>the canon.

5213
04:51:47.000 --> 04:51:50.439
<v Speaker 81>Okay, all right, I guess I had heard some misinformation

5214
04:51:50.599 --> 04:51:54.080
<v Speaker 81>then about the Orthodox belief on the epithotic Thank you sure.

5215
04:51:54.360 --> 04:51:56.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we have the same New Testament canon as

5216
04:51:58.000 --> 04:52:01.599
<v Speaker 4>Roman Catholics and Protestants, so not really in terms of

5217
04:52:01.639 --> 04:52:09.560
<v Speaker 4>the books, there's not a difference there. So this is

5218
04:52:09.560 --> 04:52:12.119
<v Speaker 4>for people who disagree. We've been going for almost five hours.

5219
04:52:12.520 --> 04:52:26.319
<v Speaker 4>You who's you? Who's You'll notice this paragraph in one

5220
04:52:26.439 --> 04:52:29.680
<v Speaker 4>hundred and fifty, chapter seventy eight says absolutely nothing like

5221
04:52:29.840 --> 04:52:32.279
<v Speaker 4>what this goop Paul was saying. I mean, the very

5222
04:52:32.319 --> 04:52:36.279
<v Speaker 4>first sentence is saying that God's nature is not created nature.

5223
04:52:40.040 --> 04:52:42.360
<v Speaker 4>If God is a nature, then all the other things

5224
04:52:42.400 --> 04:52:49.599
<v Speaker 4>are not nature. That's because of apatheticism. Then he quotes Maximus,

5225
04:52:49.759 --> 04:52:52.159
<v Speaker 4>which is the and the capped dotions that things around

5226
04:52:52.279 --> 04:52:55.759
<v Speaker 4>God those are the energies, and he says that if

5227
04:52:55.799 --> 04:52:58.080
<v Speaker 4>you understand that, you don't know the essence, but you

5228
04:52:58.159 --> 04:53:00.880
<v Speaker 4>know the energies, then your theology would be and you

5229
04:53:00.919 --> 04:53:04.000
<v Speaker 4>will be in line with the saints. That's the essencenaries sinction.

5230
04:53:04.599 --> 04:53:06.599
<v Speaker 4>God is the nature of all beings and referred to

5231
04:53:06.680 --> 04:53:09.360
<v Speaker 4>as such sense all participate in him and receive their

5232
04:53:09.400 --> 04:53:14.639
<v Speaker 4>constitution by participation. This is Maximus's teaching of Matexas. But

5233
04:53:14.880 --> 04:53:19.240
<v Speaker 4>notice not by participation in his nature. So God is

5234
04:53:19.319 --> 04:53:22.159
<v Speaker 4>the nature of all beings as their source, and since

5235
04:53:22.240 --> 04:53:25.680
<v Speaker 4>they participate in him, giving them being, but they do

5236
04:53:25.799 --> 04:53:28.880
<v Speaker 4>not participate in his nature. So this is where he

5237
04:53:28.959 --> 04:53:32.000
<v Speaker 4>was misreading it. Thus, he is the being of beings,

5238
04:53:32.439 --> 04:53:35.240
<v Speaker 4>the form of forms, because he is the source, prototype,

5239
04:53:35.360 --> 04:53:39.680
<v Speaker 4>archetype of the created world. He is not nature, however,

5240
04:53:39.919 --> 04:53:43.639
<v Speaker 4>created nature because he is beyond all nature. So these

5241
04:53:43.680 --> 04:53:47.639
<v Speaker 4>people who don't have any proficiency in understanding the complexities

5242
04:53:47.680 --> 04:53:51.200
<v Speaker 4>of palamos the essence inari distinction, confuse and jumble this

5243
04:53:51.400 --> 04:53:54.360
<v Speaker 4>up and make God into a creature. You whose what's up?

5244
04:53:57.360 --> 04:53:57.599
<v Speaker 56>Hello?

5245
04:53:58.639 --> 04:54:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Well you can hear me because right now it's ringing,

5246
04:54:03.119 --> 04:54:08.119
<v Speaker 2>I can here. Okay, So I don't know will this.

5247
04:54:08.240 --> 04:54:11.560
<v Speaker 59>Be some type of topic or a question, because it

5248
04:54:12.000 --> 04:54:13.880
<v Speaker 59>still confuses me as.

5249
04:54:13.840 --> 04:54:17.279
<v Speaker 2>A type of soiluation of humanity. I'm alsort of description.

5250
04:54:18.080 --> 04:54:24.080
<v Speaker 2>But my question is what about the Mennonites.

5251
04:54:24.319 --> 04:54:24.959
<v Speaker 69>They are like.

5252
04:54:25.200 --> 04:54:28.319
<v Speaker 2>Protestants who are cut off from.

5253
04:54:28.240 --> 04:54:32.319
<v Speaker 7>The world, like they don't have any excess on the electricity.

5254
04:54:31.799 --> 04:54:34.959
<v Speaker 4>On I don't know, Yeah, there'll still be.

5255
04:54:37.040 --> 04:54:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

5256
04:54:37.560 --> 04:54:41.599
<v Speaker 23>My question is will they lose their solution when they die?

5257
04:54:42.680 --> 04:54:47.639
<v Speaker 4>If yes, why well I don't. We don't judge individual people,

5258
04:54:47.880 --> 04:54:51.000
<v Speaker 4>but we can say that that group their profession of

5259
04:54:51.040 --> 04:54:55.599
<v Speaker 4>faith is heterodox. So it's not my position to I

5260
04:54:55.799 --> 04:54:59.880
<v Speaker 4>damn that Ezekiel over there and his buggy and Carr.

5261
04:55:00.759 --> 04:55:03.119
<v Speaker 4>I don't know their destiny, but I do know that

5262
04:55:03.520 --> 04:55:05.680
<v Speaker 4>they have They're a dumb cult. I can tell you

5263
04:55:05.720 --> 04:55:11.040
<v Speaker 4>that for sure. Bleak. The Mennonites at my dad's house

5264
04:55:11.119 --> 04:55:13.599
<v Speaker 4>used to steal his mail all the time. I mean,

5265
04:55:13.599 --> 04:55:15.360
<v Speaker 4>excuse me, the Amish at my dad's house used to

5266
04:55:15.360 --> 04:55:18.599
<v Speaker 4>steal his male. I don't know why. I guess they

5267
04:55:18.639 --> 04:55:21.400
<v Speaker 4>thought they were gonna get a Playboy magazine or he

5268
04:55:21.560 --> 04:55:24.159
<v Speaker 4>was gonna get gold bars to us. I don't know

5269
04:55:24.200 --> 04:55:26.360
<v Speaker 4>what they were looking for, but my dad used to

5270
04:55:26.400 --> 04:55:29.560
<v Speaker 4>complain all the time because the Amish would steal his male.

5271
04:55:29.799 --> 04:55:33.360
<v Speaker 4>So they're not pious, saint saintly people. They're a dumb cult. Bleak,

5272
04:55:33.439 --> 04:55:35.520
<v Speaker 4>what's up. I'm not being mean when I say that.

5273
04:55:35.680 --> 04:55:37.479
<v Speaker 4>I say that because I don't want people to beat

5274
04:55:37.560 --> 04:55:41.959
<v Speaker 4>in that dumb cult. Only people who live in the

5275
04:55:42.080 --> 04:55:45.840
<v Speaker 4>South or around Mennonites and Amish actually know how stupid

5276
04:55:46.000 --> 04:55:47.799
<v Speaker 4>this whole thing, this whole thing. A lot of people

5277
04:55:47.840 --> 04:55:50.119
<v Speaker 4>who don't have that. Oh they're like bathed and they

5278
04:55:50.560 --> 04:55:53.880
<v Speaker 4>don't do vaccines. Yeah, but like the essence of life

5279
04:55:53.919 --> 04:55:56.959
<v Speaker 4>and knowing God is not do you have milk and butter?

5280
04:55:57.159 --> 04:56:00.279
<v Speaker 4>And do you not take vaccines? Because the well, by

5281
04:56:00.319 --> 04:56:02.799
<v Speaker 4>the way, the women are actually super unhealthy. They're all

5282
04:56:02.880 --> 04:56:06.040
<v Speaker 4>like five hundred pounds, so they're not actually healthy because

5283
04:56:06.040 --> 04:56:08.439
<v Speaker 4>they don't take back scenes. And by the way, they're

5284
04:56:08.479 --> 04:56:10.360
<v Speaker 4>a crazy cult. They have their own mafia and all

5285
04:56:10.400 --> 04:56:13.479
<v Speaker 4>their own nonsense and their own peedo stuff. So do

5286
04:56:13.639 --> 04:56:23.319
<v Speaker 4>not be fooled by the appearance of piety amongst Amish. Bleak,

5287
04:56:23.400 --> 04:56:29.040
<v Speaker 4>what's up? I don't know why you're thumbing down, boomer Mom.

5288
04:56:29.119 --> 04:56:31.119
<v Speaker 4>It's a stupid cult. Like do you not know about

5289
04:56:31.159 --> 04:56:36.840
<v Speaker 4>the Amish? You don't know they're a dumb cult, boomer mom, Jan,

5290
04:56:36.880 --> 04:56:38.319
<v Speaker 4>I don't know why you're thumbing down. I'll bring you

5291
04:56:38.360 --> 04:56:39.959
<v Speaker 4>on if you want. Bleak, get on, mute.

5292
04:56:39.959 --> 04:56:40.119
<v Speaker 2>Man.

5293
04:56:41.759 --> 04:56:43.400
<v Speaker 4>We haven't had a y mom tonight, so you know

5294
04:56:43.520 --> 04:56:46.759
<v Speaker 4>why moms can come on and drunkenly tell me why

5295
04:56:46.799 --> 04:56:59.639
<v Speaker 4>I'm wrong. Bleak, you have to unmute. Okay, whatever, you

5296
04:56:59.680 --> 04:57:01.680
<v Speaker 4>don't have have to thumb down fifty times? Dude, what

5297
04:57:01.720 --> 04:57:02.080
<v Speaker 4>do you want?

5298
04:57:05.799 --> 04:57:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Can anyone hear me?

5299
04:57:06.599 --> 04:57:06.799
<v Speaker 8>Hello?

5300
04:57:07.159 --> 04:57:07.360
<v Speaker 4>Yep?

5301
04:57:08.520 --> 04:57:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Hey?

5302
04:57:09.279 --> 04:57:09.639
<v Speaker 15>Do die?

5303
04:57:09.680 --> 04:57:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Or is this our Muslims allowed in here?

5304
04:57:12.159 --> 04:57:12.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

5305
04:57:13.479 --> 04:57:13.840
<v Speaker 2>All right?

5306
04:57:14.319 --> 04:57:17.840
<v Speaker 35>I just have some questions. I think I save a

5307
04:57:17.880 --> 04:57:19.959
<v Speaker 35>false prophecy in the Gospel of Matthew.

5308
04:57:19.959 --> 04:57:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Can you address it? What in Matthew Chapter twenty seven,

5309
04:57:25.560 --> 04:57:27.000
<v Speaker 2>verse nine through time.

5310
04:57:38.400 --> 04:57:40.520
<v Speaker 4>If you could read it out loud please, I'm getting

5311
04:57:40.520 --> 04:57:46.319
<v Speaker 4>it and pulling it up, no problem, Matthew. What'd you say?

5312
04:57:46.400 --> 04:57:46.959
<v Speaker 4>Twenty seven?

5313
04:57:49.000 --> 04:57:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, first line through time.

5314
04:57:57.000 --> 04:57:59.639
<v Speaker 4>That's what was spoken by Jeremiah the prophet. They took

5315
04:57:59.720 --> 04:58:03.639
<v Speaker 4>thirty pieces of silver, the value which was priced, and

5316
04:58:03.759 --> 04:58:05.840
<v Speaker 4>they gave it as the price of the potters field.

5317
04:58:05.880 --> 04:58:06.159
<v Speaker 4>That one.

5318
04:58:07.799 --> 04:58:10.119
<v Speaker 35>Yes, I want to see where that's located in the

5319
04:58:10.159 --> 04:58:11.919
<v Speaker 35>Gulf in the US or not the GOLs, but Germuth.

5320
04:58:12.319 --> 04:58:16.560
<v Speaker 4>In the Book of Jeremiah, it might be misattributed in

5321
04:58:16.759 --> 04:58:17.880
<v Speaker 4>the masoretic texts.

5322
04:58:19.439 --> 04:58:21.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but it must be. I mean it has to

5323
04:58:21.639 --> 04:58:24.639
<v Speaker 2>be in the uh like you know, the Book of Jeremiah, right, not.

5324
04:58:24.799 --> 04:58:26.360
<v Speaker 4>If this is from the masoretic text.

5325
04:58:29.799 --> 04:58:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so where would it be from? M h.

5326
04:59:01.599 --> 04:59:08.080
<v Speaker 4>It's referring, I think, to Jeremiah's purchase of a field.

5327
04:59:09.799 --> 04:59:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

5328
04:59:10.119 --> 04:59:12.439
<v Speaker 35>Yeah, but the problem is when you go into that

5329
04:59:12.560 --> 04:59:15.040
<v Speaker 35>passage you're going to, it doesn't mention it mentioned a

5330
04:59:15.040 --> 04:59:16.520
<v Speaker 35>different amount of shuckles.

5331
04:59:18.639 --> 04:59:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Therefore it is not the same event.

5332
04:59:21.240 --> 04:59:24.680
<v Speaker 4>It's well, the second verse, the second section is the

5333
04:59:24.759 --> 04:59:29.159
<v Speaker 4>Potters field. So is that what you're talking about?

5334
04:59:30.279 --> 04:59:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so the first one I gave you? How many

5335
04:59:32.240 --> 04:59:33.680
<v Speaker 2>shuckles did that talk about? Thirty?

5336
04:59:35.159 --> 04:59:36.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? But what I'm saying is this is probably a

5337
04:59:36.959 --> 04:59:39.479
<v Speaker 4>difference between the subtuage and the masoretic text.

5338
04:59:39.319 --> 04:59:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Is what I'm saying.

5339
04:59:40.880 --> 04:59:42.799
<v Speaker 35>I mean the subtu in Mazaruta, can I get like

5340
04:59:42.919 --> 04:59:45.479
<v Speaker 35>numbers like wrong? Can they contradict to numbers? It's kind

5341
04:59:45.520 --> 04:59:45.880
<v Speaker 35>of crazy.

5342
04:59:47.479 --> 04:59:51.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, yeah, because it's too it's different translations in different orderings.

5343
04:59:51.520 --> 04:59:55.119
<v Speaker 4>And we don't go by the maz We don't go

5344
04:59:55.279 --> 04:59:59.759
<v Speaker 4>by that, so you we don't go Why do you

5345
04:59:59.840 --> 05:00:01.599
<v Speaker 4>keep interrupted? Me, I said, we don't go by that.

5346
05:00:03.279 --> 05:00:04.959
<v Speaker 2>It's not a translation, it's a reception.

5347
05:00:06.279 --> 05:00:09.439
<v Speaker 4>No, the sebtusion is a translation. It's a Greek translation.

5348
05:00:10.200 --> 05:00:12.319
<v Speaker 35>Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah yeah, it's a Greek translation,

5349
05:00:12.400 --> 05:00:16.439
<v Speaker 35>but it's known as a reception okay of the So,

5350
05:00:17.479 --> 05:00:22.200
<v Speaker 35>Jay Dyer, why name regardless? I mean, what do you

5351
05:00:22.279 --> 05:00:22.680
<v Speaker 35>want to call you?

5352
05:00:23.880 --> 05:00:24.040
<v Speaker 15>Why?

5353
05:00:24.279 --> 05:00:26.000
<v Speaker 4>It's just weird to repeat my name.

5354
05:00:27.080 --> 05:00:28.159
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm not repeating your name.

5355
05:00:28.200 --> 05:00:30.279
<v Speaker 4>I'm calling you are repeating my name. He keeps saying

5356
05:00:30.319 --> 05:00:30.959
<v Speaker 4>my full name.

5357
05:00:32.159 --> 05:00:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, j Should I call you Jay? Call you Ja?

5358
05:00:35.119 --> 05:00:35.479
<v Speaker 58>No problem?

5359
05:00:35.520 --> 05:00:35.959
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Jay.

5360
05:00:36.439 --> 05:00:39.400
<v Speaker 35>So we read in the Gospel, it's not the Gospel

5361
05:00:39.479 --> 05:00:41.200
<v Speaker 35>the Book of Jeremiah or try.

5362
05:00:41.240 --> 05:00:45.319
<v Speaker 4>So, what I'm saying is that the second phrase is

5363
05:00:45.360 --> 05:00:49.240
<v Speaker 4>a reference the potter's field. That's Zachariah. Accue me. The

5364
05:00:49.639 --> 05:00:53.400
<v Speaker 4>the potter's field, which is the second reference in verse ten,

5365
05:00:54.319 --> 05:00:58.520
<v Speaker 4>that's from Jeremiah. But the first reference is from Zechariah.

5366
05:00:58.599 --> 05:01:01.200
<v Speaker 4>And so he's just including being both of those references

5367
05:01:01.319 --> 05:01:07.240
<v Speaker 4>under Jeremiah. So the second reference, it says where it says.

5368
05:01:07.040 --> 05:01:10.000
<v Speaker 35>To be Jeremiah, because Jeremiah is a different amount of.

5369
05:01:10.479 --> 05:01:12.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, he can say Jeremiah the prophet and then he

5370
05:01:12.599 --> 05:01:17.040
<v Speaker 4>can include both verses as if the two comment on

5371
05:01:17.240 --> 05:01:19.759
<v Speaker 4>what Jeremiah is talking about. So it's not wrong to

5372
05:01:19.840 --> 05:01:22.000
<v Speaker 4>say Jeremiah if it's such a quote from Jeremiah and

5373
05:01:22.119 --> 05:01:25.880
<v Speaker 4>Zachariah to class them both under just saying Jeremiah, because

5374
05:01:25.880 --> 05:01:26.720
<v Speaker 4>this is because the the.

5375
05:01:28.479 --> 05:01:29.799
<v Speaker 2>So can you read the Jeremiah verse?

5376
05:01:31.680 --> 05:01:34.799
<v Speaker 4>It's thirty nine six to nine about the purchasing of

5377
05:01:34.880 --> 05:01:35.240
<v Speaker 4>the field.

5378
05:01:35.439 --> 05:01:40.479
<v Speaker 2>Can you read the verse? Can you read the can you? Yeah?

5379
05:01:40.520 --> 05:01:41.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking for it?

5380
05:01:41.119 --> 05:01:41.319
<v Speaker 8>Hold on?

5381
05:01:44.720 --> 05:01:46.119
<v Speaker 2>Are you lugging? I think he's lugging?

5382
05:01:49.240 --> 05:01:53.080
<v Speaker 4>It's it's it's where Jeremiah talks about purchasing the Potters field,

5383
05:01:54.080 --> 05:01:55.799
<v Speaker 4>the purchase jugging.

5384
05:01:55.919 --> 05:01:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Is it me lugging?

5385
05:01:56.639 --> 05:01:56.959
<v Speaker 44>Or is it you?

5386
05:02:08.880 --> 05:02:09.639
<v Speaker 2>Hello? Can you hear me?

5387
05:02:09.959 --> 05:02:12.159
<v Speaker 4>Hold on? Yes?

5388
05:02:12.200 --> 05:02:12.479
<v Speaker 8>Hold on?

5389
05:02:12.799 --> 05:02:17.279
<v Speaker 2>Can anyone hear me? Am I audible? Hello?

5390
05:02:17.720 --> 05:02:17.919
<v Speaker 4>Yes?

5391
05:02:20.799 --> 05:02:21.759
<v Speaker 2>Am I audible? Hello?

5392
05:02:23.000 --> 05:02:24.040
<v Speaker 4>Yes? You're audible?

5393
05:02:25.720 --> 05:02:25.959
<v Speaker 7>Hello?

5394
05:02:26.240 --> 05:02:35.159
<v Speaker 2>Am I audible? Can anyone hear me? What hell is this? Hello? Okay?

5395
05:02:35.200 --> 05:02:37.639
<v Speaker 2>You can hear me? Can you hear me?

5396
05:02:37.880 --> 05:02:38.080
<v Speaker 8>Yes?

5397
05:02:43.000 --> 05:02:44.639
<v Speaker 2>And someone put the thumbs up if they can hear me.

5398
05:02:45.639 --> 05:02:49.639
<v Speaker 4>It's because there's a difference between the numbering in Jeremiah

5399
05:02:49.799 --> 05:03:00.840
<v Speaker 4>in the Mazat text versus a septuagent. So Jeremiah the prophet,

5400
05:03:00.919 --> 05:03:02.880
<v Speaker 4>they will they took the thirty pieces of silver, and

5401
05:03:02.919 --> 05:03:04.560
<v Speaker 4>the valued him who was priced, and they gave it

5402
05:03:04.599 --> 05:03:07.400
<v Speaker 4>to the children of Israel, and they gave him the

5403
05:03:07.520 --> 05:03:10.680
<v Speaker 4>potter's field, as the Lord directed me. So that is

5404
05:03:10.759 --> 05:03:14.880
<v Speaker 4>a citation from Jeremiah. The first part is a citation

5405
05:03:15.000 --> 05:03:18.119
<v Speaker 4>from Zachariah. So it's not false to say that it's

5406
05:03:18.319 --> 05:03:25.319
<v Speaker 4>from Jeremiah when it's classing together the events and explaining them.

5407
05:03:26.159 --> 05:03:29.959
<v Speaker 4>The potters field from Jeremiah thirty six or give me

5408
05:03:30.040 --> 05:03:34.279
<v Speaker 4>thirty nine, when he buys the field, it's the Zachariah

5409
05:03:34.360 --> 05:03:42.200
<v Speaker 4>text that mentions the payment. So it's Zechariah. Somebody mentioned it.

5410
05:03:42.279 --> 05:03:43.119
<v Speaker 4>What is it Zecharia?

5411
05:03:43.159 --> 05:03:43.200
<v Speaker 10>What?

5412
05:03:55.520 --> 05:04:00.799
<v Speaker 4>Yes, it's a composite prophecy. It's combining two season saying

5413
05:04:00.840 --> 05:04:03.240
<v Speaker 4>that when Jeremiah was talking about the purchase of a field,

5414
05:04:03.959 --> 05:04:07.119
<v Speaker 4>that's a partial fulfillment of the death of Judas. The

5415
05:04:07.240 --> 05:04:10.759
<v Speaker 4>other fulfillment is the mention in Zachariah.

5416
05:04:12.759 --> 05:04:13.200
<v Speaker 65>Of the.

5417
05:04:15.040 --> 05:04:26.040
<v Speaker 4>Thirty pieces of silver. Yeah, so Zachariah eleven twelve to thirteen,

5418
05:04:27.240 --> 05:04:29.759
<v Speaker 4>thirty pieces of silver, that's the first part of the

5419
05:04:29.880 --> 05:04:42.959
<v Speaker 4>verse that's quoted. I'm getting tired. My mind is mush.

5420
05:04:44.159 --> 05:04:52.240
<v Speaker 4>But it's right here. Thirty pieces of silver that's from

5421
05:04:52.439 --> 05:04:57.439
<v Speaker 4>Zachariah that we just read and gave them. For the

5422
05:04:57.520 --> 05:05:01.159
<v Speaker 4>potters Field, as the Lord directed me, is from Jeremiah.

5423
05:05:01.560 --> 05:05:05.119
<v Speaker 4>So he's just combining two prophecies and saying Jeremiah. So

5424
05:05:05.159 --> 05:05:09.439
<v Speaker 4>it's not false. But I'm trying to find that which

5425
05:05:09.479 --> 05:05:11.840
<v Speaker 4>section of Jeremiah that is. I just read it. But again,

5426
05:05:11.959 --> 05:05:15.959
<v Speaker 4>the reason that I'm having getting confused is because in

5427
05:05:16.040 --> 05:05:28.360
<v Speaker 4>the septuagen the numbering of Jeremiah is different. So it's

5428
05:05:28.439 --> 05:05:30.919
<v Speaker 4>wherever Jeremiah talks about the potters Field, and I just

5429
05:05:30.959 --> 05:05:32.479
<v Speaker 4>read it. I just don't remember which verse it is.

5430
05:05:35.319 --> 05:05:42.919
<v Speaker 4>Here it is Jeremiah Potterfield eighteen to twenty one, is okay.

5431
05:05:43.000 --> 05:05:46.479
<v Speaker 4>So he's summarizing the sections of Jeremiah where Jeremiah purchases

5432
05:05:46.560 --> 05:05:49.319
<v Speaker 4>this field, and he's saying that is in part of

5433
05:05:49.400 --> 05:05:55.279
<v Speaker 4>fulfillment of the field, where it's a partial prediction of

5434
05:05:55.360 --> 05:05:57.639
<v Speaker 4>Judas is what I'm trying to say. So it's eighteen

5435
05:05:57.680 --> 05:06:09.639
<v Speaker 4>to twenty one. Where is it the Jeremiah purchases the field?

5436
05:06:09.759 --> 05:06:10.159
<v Speaker 2>Is that not it?

5437
05:06:32.319 --> 05:06:36.479
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? Okay? The reference is Zecharai's words it's connected to

5438
05:06:36.599 --> 05:06:39.560
<v Speaker 4>Jeremia's ministry because Jeremiah's name was on the scroll. In

5439
05:06:39.639 --> 05:06:41.959
<v Speaker 4>those days, books didn't exist, and so it was common

5440
05:06:42.040 --> 05:06:46.080
<v Speaker 4>for shorter writings to be attached to longer, more major writings.

5441
05:06:46.439 --> 05:06:48.200
<v Speaker 4>That way, you didn't have a tiny scroll for a

5442
05:06:48.240 --> 05:06:52.479
<v Speaker 4>short writing like Jonah or Obadiah. Truthfully, we don't often

5443
05:06:52.520 --> 05:06:55.520
<v Speaker 4>know today when we read which had multiple contributors, and

5444
05:06:55.599 --> 05:06:58.080
<v Speaker 4>so we often referenced the name on the cover. So

5445
05:06:58.200 --> 05:07:00.680
<v Speaker 4>the passage is a combination of two reference is namely

5446
05:07:01.200 --> 05:07:05.840
<v Speaker 4>both namely quotations from both Jeremiah, who had experience buying

5447
05:07:05.880 --> 05:07:08.919
<v Speaker 4>the potter's field on two different occasions Potters and Pottery

5448
05:07:09.000 --> 05:07:12.439
<v Speaker 4>Jeremiah eighteen and nineteen, and the quotation from Zachariah eleven,

5449
05:07:12.840 --> 05:07:15.919
<v Speaker 4>which is the was what the first part of the verse.

5450
05:07:18.400 --> 05:07:20.759
<v Speaker 4>But I was just reading in Jeremiah where he's talking

5451
05:07:20.799 --> 05:07:27.919
<v Speaker 4>about purchasing something. Doesn't it say something like the Lord

5452
05:07:28.119 --> 05:07:30.000
<v Speaker 4>instruct me to go buy a field. I'm trying to

5453
05:07:30.000 --> 05:07:36.159
<v Speaker 4>remember I've just read this, And the only reason it's

5454
05:07:36.200 --> 05:07:38.360
<v Speaker 4>confusing is because, as I was saying at the beginning

5455
05:07:38.360 --> 05:07:44.159
<v Speaker 4>of the stream, the references in the Orthodox Study Bible,

5456
05:07:44.319 --> 05:07:47.319
<v Speaker 4>the chapters are all different in Jeremiah. So it takes

5457
05:07:47.360 --> 05:08:13.400
<v Speaker 4>forever to find the reference to the field. There it

5458
05:08:13.560 --> 05:08:17.880
<v Speaker 4>is go to the potter's house. I'll give you a message.

5459
05:08:17.959 --> 05:08:21.520
<v Speaker 4>Or is that just eighteen eleven? There it is thirty

5460
05:08:21.560 --> 05:08:23.959
<v Speaker 4>two six to nine buying the field. That's what I

5461
05:08:24.040 --> 05:08:30.319
<v Speaker 4>was trying to find. But it's different. It's not thirty

5462
05:08:30.319 --> 05:08:32.200
<v Speaker 4>two six to nine in the Orthodox study. By Well,

5463
05:08:32.200 --> 05:08:39.959
<v Speaker 4>that's why I was confusing. So thirty two sixty nine

5464
05:08:52.400 --> 05:08:54.560
<v Speaker 4>there it is. Jeremiah said, the word of the Lord

5465
05:08:54.599 --> 05:08:58.880
<v Speaker 4>came to me, son of Hanahmel, your uncle will come

5466
05:08:58.959 --> 05:09:03.759
<v Speaker 4>to you saying the field and Anathoth. So that's where

5467
05:09:03.880 --> 05:09:08.040
<v Speaker 4>Jeremiah is told to go buy this field. So all

5468
05:09:08.119 --> 05:09:10.720
<v Speaker 4>of this, so all of this for the last like

5469
05:09:10.919 --> 05:09:15.479
<v Speaker 4>thirty minutes, was just this bunch of nonsense. So because

5470
05:09:16.479 --> 05:09:21.240
<v Speaker 4>ancient scrolls would write one letter or one name at

5471
05:09:21.279 --> 05:09:24.680
<v Speaker 4>the top, and you combine the prophecy together and say

5472
05:09:24.759 --> 05:09:28.319
<v Speaker 4>that it's the prophecy of Jeremiah. So you're just linking

5473
05:09:28.400 --> 05:09:31.360
<v Speaker 4>what Zechai says to half of the verse, which is Jeremiah.

5474
05:09:31.400 --> 05:09:35.159
<v Speaker 4>So it's a big nothing. Bleak. Do you want to

5475
05:09:35.200 --> 05:10:05.560
<v Speaker 4>try again? Bleak? I'm you, Hm, why do you keep

5476
05:10:05.599 --> 05:10:07.200
<v Speaker 4>going if you don't want to umute ude, don't get it.

5477
05:10:10.400 --> 05:10:38.240
<v Speaker 4>Southern reconciliation. Helloh, you don't have your MIC's turn your

5478
05:10:38.279 --> 05:10:45.799
<v Speaker 4>permissions turned on because it won't add you. Jace the

5479
05:10:45.880 --> 05:10:48.200
<v Speaker 4>last one. I don't see anybody else. Here's another. It's like,

5480
05:10:48.360 --> 05:10:50.200
<v Speaker 4>right when I think nobody else is coming, somebody else

5481
05:10:50.200 --> 05:10:50.560
<v Speaker 4>pops in.

5482
05:10:51.560 --> 05:10:58.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm mute, Heydri, can you hear me? A big fan

5483
05:10:58.319 --> 05:11:00.159
<v Speaker 2>of yours? And Sam's think you.

5484
05:11:01.080 --> 05:11:05.520
<v Speaker 83>I kind of had a I thought about Orthodox evangelism.

5485
05:11:05.880 --> 05:11:08.919
<v Speaker 83>I know there's a lot of like Protestants who go

5486
05:11:09.000 --> 05:11:11.439
<v Speaker 83>out in the streets and kind of say like repent

5487
05:11:11.599 --> 05:11:12.000
<v Speaker 83>or dies.

5488
05:11:12.159 --> 05:11:13.040
<v Speaker 64>So this is right.

5489
05:11:13.639 --> 05:11:16.360
<v Speaker 4>I appreciate that, but it's it's it's debate days, so

5490
05:11:16.400 --> 05:11:18.919
<v Speaker 4>we're not we're doing open form if you have debate

5491
05:11:19.159 --> 05:11:21.880
<v Speaker 4>or challenge or opposition burn what's up?

5492
05:11:33.240 --> 05:11:33.479
<v Speaker 2>Hello?

5493
05:11:33.919 --> 05:11:38.959
<v Speaker 27>Yeah, I just was wondering, do you have any idea

5494
05:11:39.000 --> 05:11:42.080
<v Speaker 27>what that guy's talking about with the fruitful, fruitful Bible.

5495
05:11:42.279 --> 05:11:44.599
<v Speaker 27>This is Jake Bernitz, by the way, that I sent

5496
05:11:44.680 --> 05:11:47.759
<v Speaker 27>a super trap but you didn't address it, but it

5497
05:11:47.880 --> 05:11:51.040
<v Speaker 27>was on tag. But that guy keeps talking about we

5498
05:11:51.200 --> 05:11:53.119
<v Speaker 27>use only the most fruitful Bible.

5499
05:11:53.159 --> 05:11:55.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what kind of argument that it is.

5500
05:11:56.279 --> 05:11:58.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry, okay, let me scroll down here. I missed

5501
05:11:58.400 --> 05:12:02.520
<v Speaker 4>a couple of super chats here, Casey Cardenas five dollars.

5502
05:12:02.919 --> 05:12:04.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry about that earlier question. I meant to say,

5503
05:12:04.880 --> 05:12:09.959
<v Speaker 4>as a hypothetical disagreement about the cannonation of Isaac Isaac

5504
05:12:10.000 --> 05:12:13.520
<v Speaker 4>the Syrian. Now he was in communion with the church

5505
05:12:13.880 --> 05:12:16.479
<v Speaker 4>is our view, so he wasn't out of communion. Jake

5506
05:12:16.520 --> 05:12:19.959
<v Speaker 4>Bernards ten dollars. What are some books on tag specific

5507
05:12:20.040 --> 05:12:21.279
<v Speaker 4>to Orthodoxy? There aren't any?

5508
05:12:23.479 --> 05:12:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh, there aren't.

5509
05:12:24.520 --> 05:12:27.880
<v Speaker 27>Oh, okay, well, because you make the argument in a

5510
05:12:28.000 --> 05:12:30.639
<v Speaker 27>very specific way, so I'm really trying to understand it

5511
05:12:30.959 --> 05:12:33.080
<v Speaker 27>so I can like properly portray.

5512
05:12:32.840 --> 05:12:36.200
<v Speaker 4>It, right people, Yeah, there's not one. Really, It's just

5513
05:12:36.319 --> 05:12:38.680
<v Speaker 4>kind of stuff that Father Deacon and Ias and I

5514
05:12:38.759 --> 05:12:40.479
<v Speaker 4>have been arguing. Now, he's got a lot of papers

5515
05:12:40.479 --> 05:12:42.479
<v Speaker 4>in the discord that you could look to that kind

5516
05:12:42.520 --> 05:12:43.279
<v Speaker 4>of go in that direction.

5517
05:12:44.200 --> 05:12:47.279
<v Speaker 27>Okay, Well, I was also wondering, what are some like

5518
05:12:47.599 --> 05:12:52.319
<v Speaker 27>books for like underlying philosophical topics that I need to

5519
05:12:52.439 --> 05:12:54.799
<v Speaker 27>know for that specific argument.

5520
05:12:55.000 --> 05:12:58.040
<v Speaker 4>I would say, look up Bonson's book Always Ready. You

5521
05:12:58.119 --> 05:13:00.479
<v Speaker 4>could look up an argument or a book like a

5522
05:13:01.159 --> 05:13:03.880
<v Speaker 4>Ultimate Proof by doctor Jason Lyle. Those are good ones.

5523
05:13:09.959 --> 05:13:14.639
<v Speaker 4>So we're doing people who disagree tonight. It looks like

5524
05:13:14.720 --> 05:13:23.040
<v Speaker 4>we're about about out of people, that we're about out

5525
05:13:23.080 --> 05:13:30.919
<v Speaker 4>of options here for disagreeers. So you only can come

5526
05:13:30.959 --> 05:13:33.319
<v Speaker 4>on if you disagree. So please don't come on here

5527
05:13:33.360 --> 05:13:35.759
<v Speaker 4>and ask me a bunch of orthodox fake questions.

5528
05:13:37.279 --> 05:13:37.319
<v Speaker 2>What.

5529
05:13:42.759 --> 05:13:47.439
<v Speaker 33>Yeah, I was calling to disagree about tact But that's

5530
05:13:47.479 --> 05:13:53.759
<v Speaker 33>why I kip Okay, So one of the claims that

5531
05:13:53.799 --> 05:13:56.759
<v Speaker 33>you made about classical theism, I'm just trying to explain

5532
05:13:56.840 --> 05:14:00.599
<v Speaker 33>why I have a disagreement classical theism is you can

5533
05:14:01.840 --> 05:14:04.720
<v Speaker 33>pause it other gods. It doesn't lead to just the

5534
05:14:04.840 --> 05:14:06.639
<v Speaker 33>Orthodox god exception.

5535
05:14:06.560 --> 05:14:11.880
<v Speaker 4>Right, That would be one critique of it. Yeah, it's

5536
05:14:12.000 --> 05:14:14.799
<v Speaker 4>it's not just I mean, it's rather that there's a

5537
05:14:14.919 --> 05:14:17.479
<v Speaker 4>fallacy involved, like the quantifier shift fallacy.

5538
05:14:19.279 --> 05:14:19.439
<v Speaker 2>Right.

5539
05:14:19.560 --> 05:14:23.759
<v Speaker 33>So my disagreement on tag was that, like, couldn't you

5540
05:14:23.840 --> 05:14:25.560
<v Speaker 33>make the same exactly? I mean, I think you can

5541
05:14:25.720 --> 05:14:28.119
<v Speaker 33>make the same, So I'll put it that way. I

5542
05:14:28.200 --> 05:14:33.599
<v Speaker 33>think the fact that Greg Bohnson until they're the ones

5543
05:14:33.599 --> 05:14:34.279
<v Speaker 33>who first.

5544
05:14:34.919 --> 05:14:38.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's that's that's a no, that's the genetic fallacy.

5545
05:14:38.639 --> 05:14:40.840
<v Speaker 4>The fact that people make that argument has nothing to

5546
05:14:40.919 --> 05:14:43.000
<v Speaker 4>do with like the source of an argument, not to

5547
05:14:43.040 --> 05:14:45.240
<v Speaker 4>do with whether it's true or false. So we refine

5548
05:14:45.279 --> 05:14:48.319
<v Speaker 4>that argument to say it's better fitted to the orthodox perspective.

5549
05:14:48.639 --> 05:14:56.400
<v Speaker 4>So you're just committing a genetic fallacy. I mean, as

5550
05:14:56.439 --> 05:14:59.959
<v Speaker 4>a classical theist, you commit genetic fallacies all the time.

5551
05:15:00.279 --> 05:15:06.520
<v Speaker 4>If you think that you can just go to Aristotle's God, right,

5552
05:15:08.759 --> 05:15:09.680
<v Speaker 4>could I argue that it?

5553
05:15:09.799 --> 05:15:09.919
<v Speaker 1>Well?

5554
05:15:10.639 --> 05:15:12.919
<v Speaker 4>Can I argue what if I said this? Aristotle is

5555
05:15:12.919 --> 05:15:16.840
<v Speaker 4>a pagan, So your classical theist arguments are false. It's

5556
05:15:16.880 --> 05:15:20.479
<v Speaker 4>a fallacy. Aristotle is the source of this, has nothing

5557
05:15:20.520 --> 05:15:21.560
<v Speaker 4>to do with others for false.

5558
05:15:23.040 --> 05:15:25.720
<v Speaker 33>Okay, I just thought that your critique of classical theism

5559
05:15:25.720 --> 05:15:28.360
<v Speaker 33>as an argument is that it can be used for

5560
05:15:29.680 --> 05:15:30.240
<v Speaker 33>other guys.

5561
05:15:30.279 --> 05:15:31.279
<v Speaker 2>Is that not your argument?

5562
05:15:32.799 --> 05:15:36.720
<v Speaker 4>The argument is that it doesn't specify who or what

5563
05:15:36.919 --> 05:15:39.560
<v Speaker 4>it's talking about, and so it's a deficient argument. And

5564
05:15:39.680 --> 05:15:43.040
<v Speaker 4>you're confusing that with the fact that somebody who's wrong

5565
05:15:43.319 --> 05:15:46.279
<v Speaker 4>or has a heterodox position is using a transcendental argument.

5566
05:15:46.680 --> 05:15:49.080
<v Speaker 4>That's two different things. You don't see that I'm saying.

5567
05:15:49.959 --> 05:15:51.639
<v Speaker 33>Okay, I get I do get what you're saying, but

5568
05:15:51.759 --> 05:15:53.919
<v Speaker 33>what I Okay, so you can tell me, I'm wrong.

5569
05:15:54.040 --> 05:15:56.360
<v Speaker 33>But what I'm saying is the fact that these two

5570
05:15:56.560 --> 05:16:02.240
<v Speaker 33>these two arguments can be used for any paradigm is

5571
05:16:02.360 --> 05:16:03.279
<v Speaker 33>kind of what defeats it.

5572
05:16:03.400 --> 05:16:05.119
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm That's what I'm getting at. I don't

5573
05:16:05.119 --> 05:16:05.680
<v Speaker 2>know if it.

5574
05:16:05.680 --> 05:16:09.200
<v Speaker 4>Can't be used for any paradigm, that that's the point.

5575
05:16:10.720 --> 05:16:14.759
<v Speaker 33>You're saying, the transcendental argument cannot be used validly.

5576
05:16:14.400 --> 05:16:19.040
<v Speaker 2>For other paradigms. Correct, Okay, yeah, I guess that's where

5577
05:16:19.080 --> 05:16:19.680
<v Speaker 2>I disagree.

5578
05:16:21.080 --> 05:16:23.360
<v Speaker 4>Okay, how can it be used for other paradigms?

5579
05:16:25.560 --> 05:16:28.639
<v Speaker 33>Well, I mean, well, okay, so then that's why I

5580
05:16:28.680 --> 05:16:31.080
<v Speaker 33>would say, Like if Greg Bahnson formulated.

5581
05:16:30.720 --> 05:16:34.400
<v Speaker 4>I just answered that. So you don't You don't understand.

5582
05:16:34.759 --> 05:16:39.200
<v Speaker 2>You asked me to demonstrate the Okay, the.

5583
05:16:39.279 --> 05:16:42.720
<v Speaker 4>Fact that a person who's wrong uses an argument does

5584
05:16:42.799 --> 05:16:45.279
<v Speaker 4>not mean that the argument can therefore be used by

5585
05:16:45.319 --> 05:16:47.319
<v Speaker 4>any position. You don't see the difference between that.

5586
05:16:48.000 --> 05:16:50.119
<v Speaker 33>I understand that, I understand it.

5587
05:16:50.200 --> 05:16:51.799
<v Speaker 4>But then then you restate the position.

5588
05:16:54.919 --> 05:16:57.159
<v Speaker 33>But then isn't it on you to demonstrate how he's

5589
05:16:57.240 --> 05:16:58.159
<v Speaker 33>using it invalidly?

5590
05:16:58.639 --> 05:17:00.360
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely? I do it all the time.

5591
05:17:03.479 --> 05:17:05.520
<v Speaker 33>Okay, But if you but then you appeal to the

5592
05:17:05.759 --> 05:17:11.360
<v Speaker 33>orthodox paradigm. But that's Is that refuting the argument like

5593
05:17:11.880 --> 05:17:14.840
<v Speaker 33>on philosophical grounds or is that just disagreeing.

5594
05:17:14.319 --> 05:17:18.000
<v Speaker 4>With Yeah, the argument is that Greg Bnsen doesn't have

5595
05:17:18.080 --> 05:17:22.439
<v Speaker 4>a specific, correct trinitarian doctrine to ground the transcendental argument,

5596
05:17:22.479 --> 05:17:24.279
<v Speaker 4>and so when he appeals to things like it answering

5597
05:17:24.319 --> 05:17:26.400
<v Speaker 4>the one of the many, it doesn't work because his

5598
05:17:26.520 --> 05:17:30.439
<v Speaker 4>trinitary theology is bogus. So a correct trinity theology solves

5599
05:17:30.479 --> 05:17:31.000
<v Speaker 4>that problem.

5600
05:17:33.560 --> 05:17:35.840
<v Speaker 33>So you don't see you don't see that as tangential

5601
05:17:35.959 --> 05:17:38.639
<v Speaker 33>to the transcendental argument.

5602
05:17:38.759 --> 05:17:40.759
<v Speaker 4>I guess how would it be tangential when all this

5603
05:17:40.880 --> 05:17:43.400
<v Speaker 4>time I've been arguing that the orthodox trinity is the

5604
05:17:43.439 --> 05:17:44.319
<v Speaker 4>transcendental argument.

5605
05:17:53.080 --> 05:17:56.240
<v Speaker 33>I see that as in my mind they are different categories.

5606
05:17:56.279 --> 05:17:58.159
<v Speaker 4>But okay, I you know, I mean, have you not

5607
05:17:58.279 --> 05:17:59.560
<v Speaker 4>listened to how I've been arguing it.

5608
05:18:00.279 --> 05:18:01.720
<v Speaker 33>Of course I have, Yes, I have.

5609
05:18:02.200 --> 05:18:04.439
<v Speaker 4>Well, then you just didn't get it because I've said

5610
05:18:04.520 --> 05:18:06.520
<v Speaker 4>for how many years now? Do you have to have

5611
05:18:06.639 --> 05:18:08.360
<v Speaker 4>a specific trinitarian God?

5612
05:18:09.439 --> 05:18:10.279
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm just.

5613
05:18:10.439 --> 05:18:12.479
<v Speaker 33>I'm trying to say that in my mind, there's a

5614
05:18:12.520 --> 05:18:18.279
<v Speaker 33>distinction between the private revelation and the philosophical.

5615
05:18:17.720 --> 05:18:20.360
<v Speaker 4>Argument, Like revelation, what are you talking about?

5616
05:18:21.319 --> 05:18:24.560
<v Speaker 33>Okay, Well, does Greg Bonson not have a different private

5617
05:18:24.639 --> 05:18:26.119
<v Speaker 33>revelation than someone who's.

5618
05:18:26.240 --> 05:18:28.080
<v Speaker 4>What are you talking about private revelation? I don't know

5619
05:18:28.119 --> 05:18:32.720
<v Speaker 4>what that means, no idea, what you're talking about? What's

5620
05:18:32.720 --> 05:18:34.119
<v Speaker 4>a private revelation is?

5621
05:18:34.200 --> 05:18:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Like?

5622
05:18:34.319 --> 05:18:36.080
<v Speaker 4>What offense? What are you talking about?

5623
05:18:36.159 --> 05:18:39.840
<v Speaker 33>I'll explain, No, revelation doesn't Isn't that part of any

5624
05:18:40.119 --> 05:18:43.439
<v Speaker 33>anyone's conversion? Like I'm not trying to say anything crazy here, genuinely,

5625
05:18:43.880 --> 05:18:47.759
<v Speaker 33>I'm saying, revelation is a part of anybody who professes

5626
05:18:47.919 --> 05:18:51.560
<v Speaker 33>like Orthodox Christianity, Catholic Christianity, Protestant Christianity, or they.

5627
05:18:51.479 --> 05:18:54.840
<v Speaker 4>Have different doctrines of revelation, but that's not private revelation.

5628
05:18:56.000 --> 05:18:56.279
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

5629
05:18:56.360 --> 05:18:58.840
<v Speaker 33>So okay, so throughout the word private.

5630
05:18:58.560 --> 05:18:59.319
<v Speaker 2>Then just revelation.

5631
05:18:59.479 --> 05:19:02.040
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Okay, So I'm.

5632
05:19:01.919 --> 05:19:04.840
<v Speaker 33>Saying I just said private because it's different for everybody,

5633
05:19:04.919 --> 05:19:06.279
<v Speaker 33>So like Greg Boson or whatever.

5634
05:19:06.840 --> 05:19:08.720
<v Speaker 4>So what I'm s how can it be different for everybody?

5635
05:19:10.400 --> 05:19:13.279
<v Speaker 33>It's different, meaning if you have a different paradigm, it's different.

5636
05:19:13.400 --> 05:19:15.840
<v Speaker 33>So you, as an Orthodox Christian have a different revelation

5637
05:19:16.000 --> 05:19:18.319
<v Speaker 33>than Greg Bonnson does if he's a Baptist or if

5638
05:19:18.319 --> 05:19:21.919
<v Speaker 33>he's a Protestant, and your orthodox right, Well, the factors

5639
05:19:21.919 --> 05:19:23.119
<v Speaker 33>into the transcendental argument.

5640
05:19:23.119 --> 05:19:26.439
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so you're misunderstanding. Look, it's not a different revelation.

5641
05:19:26.560 --> 05:19:31.000
<v Speaker 4>There's only one revelation, but people have misappropriations and misunderstandings

5642
05:19:31.040 --> 05:19:35.919
<v Speaker 4>of that one revelation. There's not different revelations. There's only

5643
05:19:36.040 --> 05:19:39.319
<v Speaker 4>one divine revelation, which is the depositive faith. And the

5644
05:19:39.400 --> 05:19:42.200
<v Speaker 4>fact that people get things wrong doesn't mean there's different revelations.

5645
05:19:42.240 --> 05:19:43.360
<v Speaker 4>That means they're making mistakes.

5646
05:19:45.400 --> 05:19:49.639
<v Speaker 33>Okay, But okay, so but people claim to be Okay, well,

5647
05:19:49.799 --> 05:19:53.319
<v Speaker 33>people claim divine revelations, and so you would say they're

5648
05:19:53.400 --> 05:19:54.639
<v Speaker 33>just wrong when they claim that.

5649
05:19:54.799 --> 05:19:58.439
<v Speaker 4>Right, Well, everybody has to say somebody's right and somebody's wrong,

5650
05:19:58.520 --> 05:19:59.520
<v Speaker 4>So everybody has that view.

5651
05:19:59.639 --> 05:20:03.000
<v Speaker 33>So but I'm talking specifically about revelation. That's that's why

5652
05:20:03.119 --> 05:20:04.240
<v Speaker 33>it's it's kind of important.

5653
05:20:05.479 --> 05:20:08.959
<v Speaker 4>Every position that's Catholic, Orthodox Protestant has to say that

5654
05:20:09.040 --> 05:20:13.919
<v Speaker 4>there's some specific finality, defined body of what's divine revelation

5655
05:20:14.080 --> 05:20:16.639
<v Speaker 4>and that the other positions are incorrect. It doesn't mean

5656
05:20:16.639 --> 05:20:22.279
<v Speaker 4>there's different revelations, but.

5657
05:20:22.400 --> 05:20:24.400
<v Speaker 33>The claims are different. That's all I'm trying to say.

5658
05:20:24.479 --> 05:20:28.360
<v Speaker 2>The different So that just means that just means.

5659
05:20:29.439 --> 05:20:30.599
<v Speaker 4>That just means somebody is wrong.

5660
05:20:32.880 --> 05:20:35.520
<v Speaker 33>But when it's when we're talking about revelation, it's not

5661
05:20:35.639 --> 05:20:38.279
<v Speaker 33>like a logical question or it's not like it's just

5662
05:20:38.520 --> 05:20:41.880
<v Speaker 33>something that's revealed, right, Like, how do you argue.

5663
05:20:41.720 --> 05:20:42.479
<v Speaker 2>That that's the whole?

5664
05:20:42.840 --> 05:20:45.639
<v Speaker 4>No, that's so you've been disagree with it, so you

5665
05:20:45.720 --> 05:20:48.080
<v Speaker 4>have no idea what so you don't understand these positions,

5666
05:20:48.119 --> 05:20:51.080
<v Speaker 4>so you're confused. So No, the fact that something's the

5667
05:20:51.159 --> 05:20:53.759
<v Speaker 4>fact that something's revealed does not mean that it's illogical

5668
05:20:53.840 --> 05:20:55.799
<v Speaker 4>or that it doesn't relate to logic, and not even

5669
05:20:55.799 --> 05:20:57.000
<v Speaker 4>the Roman Catholics of that position.

5670
05:20:57.680 --> 05:21:01.840
<v Speaker 33>Wait, I you're saying that, I'm saying it's it's necessarily illogical.

5671
05:21:01.959 --> 05:21:03.200
<v Speaker 33>If someone is saying I'm not.

5672
05:21:03.279 --> 05:21:06.080
<v Speaker 4>Saying that, you said, how does it even relate to logic?

5673
05:21:06.319 --> 05:21:08.799
<v Speaker 4>Of course logic is grounded in revelation. That's our perer,

5674
05:21:08.880 --> 05:21:09.479
<v Speaker 4>that's our position.

5675
05:21:12.200 --> 05:21:12.479
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

5676
05:21:12.560 --> 05:21:14.639
<v Speaker 33>But and so all I'm saying is that on a

5677
05:21:14.720 --> 05:21:19.080
<v Speaker 33>transcendental argument from my perspective, everybody claims that, So there's

5678
05:21:19.119 --> 05:21:20.000
<v Speaker 33>no way to DeLine in.

5679
05:21:20.119 --> 05:21:23.520
<v Speaker 4>You're confusing claiming something with it being the case. Those

5680
05:21:23.560 --> 05:21:25.439
<v Speaker 4>are two different things. The fact that they claim it

5681
05:21:25.520 --> 05:21:26.840
<v Speaker 4>is irrelevant. You don't understand that.

5682
05:21:27.720 --> 05:21:29.639
<v Speaker 33>Okay, So you're saying the fact that they claim it

5683
05:21:29.680 --> 05:21:32.439
<v Speaker 33>doesn't make it true. Right, So I understand that you're

5684
05:21:32.639 --> 05:21:33.919
<v Speaker 33>repeating that. I understand that.

5685
05:21:34.360 --> 05:21:36.799
<v Speaker 4>But then you go back to arguing like that doesn't

5686
05:21:36.840 --> 05:21:38.599
<v Speaker 4>the case and I didn't say that, So you're.

5687
05:21:38.479 --> 05:21:41.639
<v Speaker 33>Well, all I'm saying is that they exist different these

5688
05:21:41.720 --> 05:21:44.680
<v Speaker 33>different claims exist, and that there's no way to do

5689
05:21:44.880 --> 05:21:49.319
<v Speaker 33>there's no The step after that is to argue, well,

5690
05:21:49.400 --> 05:21:50.080
<v Speaker 33>my revelation.

5691
05:21:50.200 --> 05:21:51.240
<v Speaker 2>That's why I brought up revelation.

5692
05:21:51.560 --> 05:21:54.080
<v Speaker 4>This is the point where you're misunderstanding is that we're

5693
05:21:54.119 --> 05:21:57.639
<v Speaker 4>not stuck in that position. You can use logic and

5694
05:21:57.720 --> 05:22:00.560
<v Speaker 4>reasoning to fetter out which position is fall which one

5695
05:22:00.639 --> 05:22:04.639
<v Speaker 4>is true. For example, rag Boson's trinitarian theology does not

5696
05:22:04.840 --> 05:22:07.279
<v Speaker 4>work to do the grounding that our position does.

5697
05:22:07.520 --> 05:22:10.240
<v Speaker 2>That's the point, okay, But.

5698
05:22:10.319 --> 05:22:13.000
<v Speaker 33>You don't you don't see how this is just okay,

5699
05:22:13.040 --> 05:22:15.200
<v Speaker 33>all right? When we're when you argue on that level,

5700
05:22:15.479 --> 05:22:17.200
<v Speaker 33>there's no way to distinguish.

5701
05:22:17.279 --> 05:22:19.119
<v Speaker 4>I mean, of course there is. What do you mean,

5702
05:22:19.240 --> 05:22:21.919
<v Speaker 4>how else would we argue how else would we argue

5703
05:22:21.959 --> 05:22:24.840
<v Speaker 4>against how else would we argue against a Muslim? If

5704
05:22:24.880 --> 05:22:27.360
<v Speaker 4>you can't distinguish on the trinitarian level, which ones which

5705
05:22:27.400 --> 05:22:28.040
<v Speaker 4>true and falls.

5706
05:22:28.759 --> 05:22:30.720
<v Speaker 33>I didn't see on the trinitaryarian level.

5707
05:22:31.040 --> 05:22:32.959
<v Speaker 4>I just made the argument on the trinitarian level.

5708
05:22:33.000 --> 05:22:33.400
<v Speaker 15>What do you mean?

5709
05:22:33.680 --> 05:22:36.319
<v Speaker 2>Fine? Okay, I thought you were responding to what I said. Okay,

5710
05:22:36.400 --> 05:22:39.560
<v Speaker 2>so I was okay, all right, all right, I'm.

5711
05:22:39.400 --> 05:22:40.040
<v Speaker 33>Willing to let it go.

5712
05:22:40.360 --> 05:22:41.479
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if this is helping you.

5713
05:22:41.680 --> 05:22:42.479
<v Speaker 33>It really isn't.

5714
05:22:42.840 --> 05:22:45.040
<v Speaker 4>It's helping me, Like I think you're the one that

5715
05:22:45.119 --> 05:22:46.680
<v Speaker 4>isn't helping man. I'm just trying to be mean.

5716
05:22:46.799 --> 05:22:48.520
<v Speaker 33>No, I agree, I'm not trying to be I'm just

5717
05:22:48.599 --> 05:22:50.240
<v Speaker 33>trying not to frustrate anything.

5718
05:22:50.319 --> 05:22:52.200
<v Speaker 2>But it really is a disagreement. So that's why.

5719
05:22:52.319 --> 05:22:56.040
<v Speaker 4>But it's a disagreement because you don't you don't understand that.

5720
05:22:56.240 --> 05:22:58.959
<v Speaker 4>It's like you think that you can't argue paradigms. Is

5721
05:22:59.000 --> 05:22:59.599
<v Speaker 4>that what you think?

5722
05:23:00.360 --> 05:23:01.520
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't think that.

5723
05:23:01.799 --> 05:23:06.759
<v Speaker 33>I think that the transcendental argument demonstrates how everybody has

5724
05:23:06.840 --> 05:23:08.560
<v Speaker 33>a paradigm. But I think that's all it does.

5725
05:23:08.720 --> 05:23:12.080
<v Speaker 4>No, that's that's what you're misunderstanding because you haven't listened

5726
05:23:12.119 --> 05:23:14.040
<v Speaker 4>to me. You said you did. I've argued for years

5727
05:23:14.080 --> 05:23:17.200
<v Speaker 4>now that it requires a specific type of God in metaphysic.

5728
05:23:17.439 --> 05:23:21.400
<v Speaker 4>Don't you understand that Christianity presents a specific trinitarian metaphysic.

5729
05:23:21.439 --> 05:23:24.360
<v Speaker 4>And when I say that, you said Christianity. Yes. And

5730
05:23:24.479 --> 05:23:27.119
<v Speaker 4>when I say that, you say, you can't argue that.

5731
05:23:27.439 --> 05:23:29.360
<v Speaker 4>Why would you think that? I've been arguing this for years.

5732
05:23:32.040 --> 05:23:34.080
<v Speaker 33>The one, so, the one in the many is the

5733
05:23:34.200 --> 05:23:36.080
<v Speaker 33>only the only thing that sets it aside.

5734
05:23:36.119 --> 05:23:38.880
<v Speaker 4>I know, of course, not where are you getting I

5735
05:23:39.840 --> 05:23:40.959
<v Speaker 4>mean no, I mean.

5736
05:23:41.000 --> 05:23:43.240
<v Speaker 33>As a response to what I'm saying as a response.

5737
05:23:43.279 --> 05:23:46.159
<v Speaker 4>Now, that's just one example of where Bonson fails. Bonson

5738
05:23:46.159 --> 05:23:48.599
<v Speaker 4>fails on the nature person distinction. He fails in the

5739
05:23:48.720 --> 05:23:51.639
<v Speaker 4>essence interrodustinction. He has the absolute divine simplicity position of

5740
05:23:51.639 --> 05:23:54.119
<v Speaker 4>a Roman Catholics, and so that makes God unknowable. All

5741
05:23:54.200 --> 05:23:57.240
<v Speaker 4>of these things would contribute to why his trinity fails

5742
05:23:57.319 --> 05:23:58.919
<v Speaker 4>to do the grounding work. Do you know what I

5743
05:23:59.000 --> 05:23:59.799
<v Speaker 4>mean when I say that.

5744
05:24:01.759 --> 05:24:03.200
<v Speaker 33>I believe I understand what you're saying.

5745
05:24:03.279 --> 05:24:03.959
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I do believe.

5746
05:24:04.000 --> 05:24:04.919
<v Speaker 33>I understand what you're saying.

5747
05:24:04.959 --> 05:24:08.360
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so you have to have the metaphysics, so well,

5748
05:24:08.400 --> 05:24:09.919
<v Speaker 4>then that answers your dilemma.

5749
05:24:13.159 --> 05:24:16.240
<v Speaker 33>Okay, all right, all right, I can see that point.

5750
05:24:16.279 --> 05:24:18.400
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I'm not like it, but you seem like you don't.

5751
05:24:18.560 --> 05:24:20.319
<v Speaker 4>So you're just saying that to not have an argument

5752
05:24:20.439 --> 05:24:20.959
<v Speaker 4>or something like that.

5753
05:24:21.040 --> 05:24:23.200
<v Speaker 33>Well, no, I know, I mean I'm working it through.

5754
05:24:23.400 --> 05:24:25.159
<v Speaker 33>But yeah, I am working it through. What can I

5755
05:24:25.200 --> 05:24:27.799
<v Speaker 33>say like it to me? Again, I'm trying to I'm

5756
05:24:27.880 --> 05:24:30.959
<v Speaker 33>just trying to explain that the paradigm level argument is

5757
05:24:31.119 --> 05:24:34.400
<v Speaker 33>just everybody claiming their paradigm. So it's all circular. Because

5758
05:24:34.439 --> 05:24:37.680
<v Speaker 33>you did mention that there's internal You've missed.

5759
05:24:37.720 --> 05:24:40.000
<v Speaker 4>You've missed the entire point of TAG, which is to

5760
05:24:40.319 --> 05:24:45.560
<v Speaker 4>compare and dispreparadigms by internal inconsistencies at a fundamental level,

5761
05:24:45.599 --> 05:24:49.400
<v Speaker 4>which make knowledge and metaphysics and ethics impossible in that system. So,

5762
05:24:49.439 --> 05:24:52.959
<v Speaker 4>if you want me to be precise with Monson, Bonson's worldview,

5763
05:24:53.040 --> 05:24:56.799
<v Speaker 4>even though he admits TAG doesn't work to do the

5764
05:24:57.040 --> 05:24:59.720
<v Speaker 4>grounding work that he needs it to do because the

5765
05:25:00.279 --> 05:25:03.360
<v Speaker 4>that he wants to ground it in is unknowable, untouchable,

5766
05:25:03.520 --> 05:25:06.400
<v Speaker 4>doesn't interact with the world ultimately because it's the Calvinist deity.

5767
05:25:06.680 --> 05:25:07.240
<v Speaker 2>So that's.

5768
05:25:08.759 --> 05:25:10.919
<v Speaker 4>One example, and that's why it doesn't work to do

5769
05:25:11.000 --> 05:25:15.119
<v Speaker 4>any one in many grounding. Sure, you don't Okay, yeah,

5770
05:25:16.159 --> 05:25:18.840
<v Speaker 4>go ahead. That's what I've been saying for years now.

5771
05:25:19.880 --> 05:25:20.840
<v Speaker 2>No, and I've been listening.

5772
05:25:20.840 --> 05:25:23.799
<v Speaker 33>I just don't like how these all tie together. Like, look,

5773
05:25:23.840 --> 05:25:26.560
<v Speaker 33>the transcedental argument is just one argument. That's how I

5774
05:25:26.720 --> 05:25:27.000
<v Speaker 33>see it.

5775
05:25:27.080 --> 05:25:30.200
<v Speaker 2>But you're stating it on a much way.

5776
05:25:30.319 --> 05:25:32.520
<v Speaker 4>You said you've been listening to me for years. I've

5777
05:25:32.599 --> 05:25:34.119
<v Speaker 4>been making this point for years.

5778
05:25:34.759 --> 05:25:37.680
<v Speaker 33>Okay, so yeah, almost, Okay, so I'm just slow then,

5779
05:25:37.759 --> 05:25:39.919
<v Speaker 33>but I'm like, I do, I do feel like I'm

5780
05:25:40.799 --> 05:25:43.200
<v Speaker 33>me I'm understanding the transcendental argument.

5781
05:25:43.840 --> 05:25:46.680
<v Speaker 4>It's listen, maybe this is what help. It's an argument

5782
05:25:47.000 --> 05:25:49.919
<v Speaker 4>for a paradigm. It's not an argument for an abstract

5783
05:25:50.000 --> 05:25:53.840
<v Speaker 4>thing like conceptual reality or universals. It's an argument for

5784
05:25:53.959 --> 05:25:54.959
<v Speaker 4>the entire paradigm.

5785
05:25:55.799 --> 05:25:58.680
<v Speaker 33>Okay, could I just ask you a question that clarifies. Okay, listen,

5786
05:25:58.880 --> 05:26:02.000
<v Speaker 33>if someone can make an argument, can that argument be

5787
05:26:02.119 --> 05:26:04.919
<v Speaker 33>used for different for different traditions, or for different things.

5788
05:26:05.040 --> 05:26:06.639
<v Speaker 33>I mean that in my mind, that's.

5789
05:26:06.520 --> 05:26:09.520
<v Speaker 4>Just it doesn't matter, so you keep confusing things that

5790
05:26:09.560 --> 05:26:11.919
<v Speaker 4>are irrelevant to whether it's true or false. So that'd

5791
05:26:11.959 --> 05:26:14.680
<v Speaker 4>be like saying, I mean, could a Mormon use a

5792
05:26:14.799 --> 05:26:19.439
<v Speaker 4>cosmological argument? And does that make the cosmological argument useless

5793
05:26:19.479 --> 05:26:21.880
<v Speaker 4>because Mormons use it. You see how silly that would

5794
05:26:21.959 --> 05:26:22.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying.

5795
05:26:22.599 --> 05:26:24.840
<v Speaker 33>Use the form of the argument can still be valid

5796
05:26:24.919 --> 05:26:27.080
<v Speaker 33>in my opinion, That's what I'm saying, the form of

5797
05:26:27.119 --> 05:26:27.680
<v Speaker 33>the argument.

5798
05:26:27.759 --> 05:26:30.360
<v Speaker 4>No, No, you're missing the point, the fact that if

5799
05:26:30.840 --> 05:26:35.680
<v Speaker 4>a Mormon and an atheist and a scientologist use the

5800
05:26:35.799 --> 05:26:41.439
<v Speaker 4>cosmological argument, that doesn't make the cosmological argument relativized to

5801
05:26:41.599 --> 05:26:44.919
<v Speaker 4>the systems. It just means that somebody's are all three

5802
05:26:45.040 --> 05:26:48.240
<v Speaker 4>are misusing it incorrectly and they're inconsistent. Do you see that?

5803
05:26:49.400 --> 05:26:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay?

5804
05:26:49.959 --> 05:26:51.840
<v Speaker 33>And again this is where I would disagree. I would

5805
05:26:51.840 --> 05:26:55.159
<v Speaker 33>say they're using the argument, they're just plugging in different

5806
05:26:55.439 --> 05:26:57.360
<v Speaker 33>values for what you then, what.

5807
05:26:57.520 --> 05:26:59.759
<v Speaker 4>The transcenental argument is actually that you have to give

5808
05:26:59.759 --> 05:27:04.240
<v Speaker 4>a count for cosmology and causation itself. You say, so,

5809
05:27:04.319 --> 05:27:06.119
<v Speaker 4>it's a bigger picture than that. It's an argument for

5810
05:27:06.200 --> 05:27:11.080
<v Speaker 4>a paradigm. It's not an argument for Do you understand

5811
05:27:11.080 --> 05:27:13.080
<v Speaker 4>when I say it's an argument for the entire Christian

5812
05:27:13.119 --> 05:27:19.279
<v Speaker 4>paradigm that includes Christian metaphysics. I don't think you're understanding

5813
05:27:19.319 --> 05:27:21.279
<v Speaker 4>that it's an argument for a paradigm, not for a

5814
05:27:21.360 --> 05:27:22.279
<v Speaker 4>peace of the worldview.

5815
05:27:23.119 --> 05:27:25.720
<v Speaker 33>No, I think I understand a paradigm level argument.

5816
05:27:25.840 --> 05:27:25.880
<v Speaker 2>No.

5817
05:27:26.040 --> 05:27:29.000
<v Speaker 4>No, not a paradigm level argument. The argument is for

5818
05:27:29.240 --> 05:27:31.880
<v Speaker 4>the entire Christian paradigm, right, for that's what I.

5819
05:27:31.919 --> 05:27:33.799
<v Speaker 2>Meant by okay, excuse me, I take that back.

5820
05:27:33.880 --> 05:27:36.240
<v Speaker 33>A paradigm okay, argument for the paradigm.

5821
05:27:36.319 --> 05:27:39.479
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I understand that answers your question. So, in other words,

5822
05:27:39.479 --> 05:27:44.759
<v Speaker 4>if a person uses something from my paradigm like teleology

5823
05:27:44.880 --> 05:27:49.479
<v Speaker 4>or causation, that doesn't make my paradigm relativized, and it

5824
05:27:49.560 --> 05:27:52.159
<v Speaker 4>doesn't mean I can't disprove them because they're using elements

5825
05:27:52.200 --> 05:27:52.880
<v Speaker 4>of my worldview.

5826
05:27:53.680 --> 05:27:57.119
<v Speaker 33>So I'm not saying it invalidates you using the argument.

5827
05:27:57.279 --> 05:28:00.279
<v Speaker 33>I'm just saying it doesn't do the work of all

5828
05:28:00.360 --> 05:28:01.919
<v Speaker 33>the work that someone would want it to do.

5829
05:28:02.080 --> 05:28:02.360
<v Speaker 2>That's all.

5830
05:28:02.720 --> 05:28:05.680
<v Speaker 4>But that's because you misunderstand what the argument is, thinking

5831
05:28:05.720 --> 05:28:07.680
<v Speaker 4>that it's only half of the job, which is just

5832
05:28:08.200 --> 05:28:11.520
<v Speaker 4>saying that there's a paradigm level thing. It's also the

5833
05:28:11.639 --> 05:28:15.439
<v Speaker 4>positive case of presenting the Christian paradigm in Christian metaphysics.

5834
05:28:15.520 --> 05:28:18.799
<v Speaker 4>That's the other half of the argument. You can't just say, well,

5835
05:28:19.080 --> 05:28:24.279
<v Speaker 4>I believe that everybody has presuppositions about ethics, metaphysics and uh,

5836
05:28:24.439 --> 05:28:27.159
<v Speaker 4>you know, knowledge and the other positions are inconsistent. That

5837
05:28:27.319 --> 05:28:29.799
<v Speaker 4>doesn't prove your position. You also have to give the

5838
05:28:29.880 --> 05:28:34.319
<v Speaker 4>positive case for Christian metaphysics, Christian ethics, and Christian epistemology,

5839
05:28:34.599 --> 05:28:36.560
<v Speaker 4>and that is only found in the worldview. That's why

5840
05:28:36.560 --> 05:28:37.919
<v Speaker 4>it's an argument for an entire worldview.

5841
05:28:38.000 --> 05:28:41.360
<v Speaker 33>When I hear the transcendental argument, I do see. I

5842
05:28:41.560 --> 05:28:43.279
<v Speaker 33>just see it was what you first stated.

5843
05:28:43.360 --> 05:28:47.560
<v Speaker 4>That's that's that's that's what I've been arguing for your Well.

5844
05:28:47.479 --> 05:28:48.000
<v Speaker 2>I understand.

5845
05:28:48.080 --> 05:28:50.279
<v Speaker 33>I just that's why I'm disagreeing, and that's why I

5846
05:28:50.360 --> 05:28:50.880
<v Speaker 33>was debating it.

5847
05:28:51.000 --> 05:28:55.639
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, I understand, Okay, fair enough, that's okay. Yeah,

5848
05:28:55.639 --> 05:28:58.279
<v Speaker 4>I've got some other talks where I think the Phaser talk.

5849
05:28:58.360 --> 05:29:00.360
<v Speaker 4>If you go watch that one recritique phase, I go

5850
05:29:00.479 --> 05:29:02.720
<v Speaker 4>into why it's got to be more than just the

5851
05:29:02.799 --> 05:29:05.720
<v Speaker 4>negative critique. Also, be sure to read the Manion paper

5852
05:29:05.759 --> 05:29:07.520
<v Speaker 4>I think you would do well to read, because Manion

5853
05:29:07.599 --> 05:29:10.720
<v Speaker 4>in that paper of the Contingency of Knowledge, he talks

5854
05:29:10.759 --> 05:29:13.799
<v Speaker 4>about why, even if you just disprove the other world views,

5855
05:29:14.360 --> 05:29:18.720
<v Speaker 4>you also got to do the positive work to present

5856
05:29:18.840 --> 05:29:21.959
<v Speaker 4>you your position, because just a negative critique is not

5857
05:29:22.080 --> 05:29:28.639
<v Speaker 4>enough to justify your position. Jack. Oh he dropped right

5858
05:29:28.639 --> 05:29:46.759
<v Speaker 4>when I'm adding him. You there, bleak, bleak, Hello, can.

5859
05:29:46.680 --> 05:29:48.759
<v Speaker 2>You hear me, sir? Amazing?

5860
05:29:50.000 --> 05:29:53.759
<v Speaker 11>Okay, it's so stupid, I'm okay. So I never spoke

5861
05:29:53.840 --> 05:29:55.720
<v Speaker 11>on the next space before anyway.

5862
05:29:56.240 --> 05:30:01.319
<v Speaker 62>So you said, I believe you said that Gnostics and

5863
05:30:02.119 --> 05:30:06.599
<v Speaker 62>I'm talking about the Christian Christianity, A Gnosticism and Christianity.

5864
05:30:07.919 --> 05:30:12.799
<v Speaker 62>Uh all believed across the board that Jesus didn't have

5865
05:30:12.919 --> 05:30:16.240
<v Speaker 62>a real human body, that he was ephemeral or some

5866
05:30:16.439 --> 05:30:16.959
<v Speaker 62>kind of a No.

5867
05:30:17.080 --> 05:30:20.840
<v Speaker 4>I said, I said, docitists believe that. I'd say all gnostics.

5868
05:30:21.240 --> 05:30:23.560
<v Speaker 11>Oh okay, Oh, that's what I was going to say,

5869
05:30:23.599 --> 05:30:26.240
<v Speaker 11>because I thought you just said gnostics.

5870
05:30:26.080 --> 05:30:27.639
<v Speaker 2>Didn't believe that. I didn't hear that.

5871
05:30:28.000 --> 05:30:29.040
<v Speaker 4>When when are you talking?

5872
05:30:30.479 --> 05:30:30.759
<v Speaker 7>Uh you?

5873
05:30:31.279 --> 05:30:33.040
<v Speaker 2>That's what I was going to say, you know the quatism?

5874
05:30:33.560 --> 05:30:36.599
<v Speaker 4>Are you talking about the interview with a pastate prophet?

5875
05:30:37.720 --> 05:30:40.799
<v Speaker 4>What are you talking about the interview of the pastate prophet?

5876
05:30:40.880 --> 05:30:42.680
<v Speaker 4>That's the last time I remember talking about.

5877
05:30:42.400 --> 05:30:45.840
<v Speaker 2>That, No tonight, you said it earlier time.

5878
05:30:46.000 --> 05:30:47.360
<v Speaker 4>I don't remember that coming up tonight.

5879
05:30:47.959 --> 05:30:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh well that's why I requested to speak, because that

5880
05:30:52.520 --> 05:30:53.240
<v Speaker 2>you did say that.

5881
05:30:55.040 --> 05:30:55.520
<v Speaker 4>When I took it.

5882
05:30:55.599 --> 05:30:59.560
<v Speaker 11>I didn't catch the doquatism reference. How do you pronounce

5883
05:30:59.639 --> 05:31:00.439
<v Speaker 11>that headism?

5884
05:31:02.080 --> 05:31:02.560
<v Speaker 2>How do you u?

5885
05:31:03.040 --> 05:31:07.759
<v Speaker 4>It's in English? Everybody says docatism, but it's docatism, I

5886
05:31:07.840 --> 05:31:10.119
<v Speaker 4>guess with the k or the hard seat or whatever.

5887
05:31:10.520 --> 05:31:14.000
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, doctism and so yeah, because you know there's there's

5888
05:31:14.080 --> 05:31:17.880
<v Speaker 11>different sects of gnostics, rostics correct, And of course the

5889
05:31:18.000 --> 05:31:24.119
<v Speaker 11>Valentinians did not believe that Jesus was solelya ephemeral you know, spirit.

5890
05:31:23.959 --> 05:31:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Human divine.

5891
05:31:25.919 --> 05:31:27.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, correct, you're right out of body.

5892
05:31:27.919 --> 05:31:33.520
<v Speaker 11>Because they didn't believe that the Christ's entered was born

5893
05:31:34.119 --> 05:31:37.360
<v Speaker 11>as you know, that Jesus wasn't born with as Christ,

5894
05:31:37.439 --> 05:31:42.439
<v Speaker 11>that he was imparted with the divinity of Christ, if

5895
05:31:42.479 --> 05:31:43.840
<v Speaker 11>I understand that correctly.

5896
05:31:44.720 --> 05:31:48.200
<v Speaker 2>So that's yeah, is that basically you know?

5897
05:31:49.119 --> 05:31:51.000
<v Speaker 4>That's yeah, that's all you wanted to get to. I

5898
05:31:51.080 --> 05:31:51.720
<v Speaker 4>agree with you on that.

5899
05:31:52.639 --> 05:31:56.279
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Yeah, well thanks for taking my taking my ex

5900
05:31:56.439 --> 05:31:59.360
<v Speaker 2>cherry here, so all right, bye.

5901
05:31:59.200 --> 05:32:01.080
<v Speaker 4>Bye, Thanks Jack. What's up?

5902
05:32:01.159 --> 05:32:13.720
<v Speaker 8>Man? Jack?

5903
05:32:19.200 --> 05:32:19.479
<v Speaker 6>Hello?

5904
05:32:20.639 --> 05:32:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Can you hear me? How are you? Man?

5905
05:32:26.319 --> 05:32:28.400
<v Speaker 4>I don't even know right now. I'm kind of like

5906
05:32:28.520 --> 05:32:30.959
<v Speaker 4>in I'm in I feel like I'm in a dissociative state.

5907
05:32:31.040 --> 05:32:31.360
<v Speaker 4>What's up?

5908
05:32:32.880 --> 05:32:35.639
<v Speaker 2>All right, doing good, but you look like a little

5909
05:32:35.680 --> 05:32:36.159
<v Speaker 2>bit tired.

5910
05:32:38.040 --> 05:32:39.919
<v Speaker 4>Hello, I mean with it. We're going on six hours,

5911
05:32:39.959 --> 05:32:40.439
<v Speaker 4>so what's up?

5912
05:32:40.919 --> 05:32:41.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know.

5913
05:32:42.520 --> 05:32:49.279
<v Speaker 59>My question is actually before that, I was surging I

5914
05:32:49.439 --> 05:32:54.479
<v Speaker 59>believe the God. I was surging to religions, like I

5915
05:32:54.599 --> 05:33:01.400
<v Speaker 59>searched Catholic, Catholic religions or Christianity or Islamic or a Buddhisim.

5916
05:33:04.080 --> 05:33:05.720
<v Speaker 2>At that at that point.

5917
05:33:07.080 --> 05:33:10.479
<v Speaker 59>I realized something in the Quran. It was it was

5918
05:33:10.560 --> 05:33:14.520
<v Speaker 59>really interesting. I just want to mention about that because

5919
05:33:14.720 --> 05:33:18.200
<v Speaker 59>my question is related with this information.

5920
05:33:19.040 --> 05:33:19.159
<v Speaker 35>Uh.

5921
05:33:21.159 --> 05:33:26.200
<v Speaker 59>Yeah. When I started the Quran, I I read some

5922
05:33:28.400 --> 05:33:33.360
<v Speaker 59>I read some academic writer and they was mentioned about that.

5923
05:33:33.560 --> 05:33:33.919
<v Speaker 2>It was.

5924
05:33:36.439 --> 05:33:48.599
<v Speaker 59>Like Smarianism, Aztecs Babylon or Judaism or Genesis Talmud or

5925
05:33:49.799 --> 05:33:57.200
<v Speaker 59>gold Muskatonic, Katonical and Apercle Gospels.

5926
05:33:57.840 --> 05:34:00.080
<v Speaker 2>Uh, and like history after.

5927
05:34:00.080 --> 05:34:10.360
<v Speaker 59>Religions me trilogists like astronomy, Madison, physics, okay, what trilogy

5928
05:34:11.639 --> 05:34:15.040
<v Speaker 59>or just a second uh, just like.

5929
05:34:16.759 --> 05:34:17.159
<v Speaker 7>Egypt.

5930
05:34:20.279 --> 05:34:23.400
<v Speaker 4>And my question is that, like you're not going to

5931
05:34:23.439 --> 05:34:27.919
<v Speaker 4>read a whole encyclopedia entrance and then tell me to

5932
05:34:28.040 --> 05:34:31.880
<v Speaker 4>hold on. I think my mind is about mush. I

5933
05:34:31.919 --> 05:34:34.840
<v Speaker 4>don't think I can go on anymore. Uh, thank you guys.

5934
05:34:34.880 --> 05:34:41.040
<v Speaker 4>A lot of fun tonight, Wild I'm spent on mush. Everybody,

5935
05:34:41.080 --> 05:34:41.560
<v Speaker 4>have a good night.
