WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.720 --> 00:00:03.919
<v Speaker 1>All right, Hi, this William Ramsey. Welcome to William Ramsey

2
00:00:03.960 --> 00:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Investigates on Tonight Show. Have a very special guest. He

3
00:00:06.240 --> 00:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>comes to us from Australia. His name is doctor Tasman Walker,

4
00:00:10.839 --> 00:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and he is with a website, but he also has

5
00:00:13.359 --> 00:00:16.839
<v Speaker 1>a background in the general subject of creationism. But a

6
00:00:16.839 --> 00:00:19.079
<v Speaker 1>lot of his information that I saw was on creation

7
00:00:19.199 --> 00:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com. So it's c R E A T I

8
00:00:22.039 --> 00:00:24.920
<v Speaker 1>O N dot com and we're going to talk about

9
00:00:24.920 --> 00:00:30.079
<v Speaker 1>his inquiry and insights into something that's much different than

10
00:00:30.399 --> 00:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>people would think, which is the legacy of the Earth,

11
00:00:33.280 --> 00:00:37.079
<v Speaker 1>out the dates of the Earth, and maybe also contradicts

12
00:00:37.159 --> 00:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of evolutionary biology. But he can talk more about that.

13
00:00:40.320 --> 00:00:42.520
<v Speaker 1>So doctor tas Walker, are you there.

14
00:00:43.880 --> 00:00:46.520
<v Speaker 2>It's good to be here, Bill, It's really nice to

15
00:00:46.560 --> 00:00:47.439
<v Speaker 2>be on your program.

16
00:00:47.960 --> 00:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Great, thanks for gring to the interview for people may

17
00:00:50.320 --> 00:00:52.799
<v Speaker 1>not have heard your background or your name. Can you

18
00:00:52.920 --> 00:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about what led you kind of to this inquiry

19
00:00:57.000 --> 00:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and then what's your kind of view of creation is?

20
00:01:00.320 --> 00:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Is that contradicts kind of the modern scientific worldview?

21
00:01:04.920 --> 00:01:08.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I guess you'd have to say it came

22
00:01:08.560 --> 00:01:10.920
<v Speaker 2>out of my Christian commitment when I was in my

23
00:01:11.079 --> 00:01:15.400
<v Speaker 2>early teens, I made a commitment to christ and I've

24
00:01:15.400 --> 00:01:18.640
<v Speaker 2>always been interested in how things work, pulling things apart,

25
00:01:18.879 --> 00:01:22.400
<v Speaker 2>putting things together, and I ended up becoming an engineer.

26
00:01:22.920 --> 00:01:26.519
<v Speaker 2>So that's really my background. So when I became a Christian,

27
00:01:26.560 --> 00:01:29.680
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to figure out how everything fitted together and

28
00:01:30.000 --> 00:01:32.640
<v Speaker 2>how it fitted in with science, and that really started

29
00:01:32.640 --> 00:01:36.000
<v Speaker 2>a journey for me, and I guess it really came

30
00:01:36.040 --> 00:01:38.840
<v Speaker 2>together when I read the book The Genesis Flood by

31
00:01:38.879 --> 00:01:41.719
<v Speaker 2>Whitcombe and Morris. I was in my twenties when I

32
00:01:41.760 --> 00:01:43.840
<v Speaker 2>read that. Before that, I really couldn't see how it

33
00:01:43.840 --> 00:01:48.239
<v Speaker 2>fitted together. And I connected with a group called Creation

34
00:01:48.400 --> 00:01:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Science Foundation, which was active at the time in the

35
00:01:52.040 --> 00:01:55.239
<v Speaker 2>city where I lived in Brisbane, Australia, and so I

36
00:01:55.280 --> 00:02:00.480
<v Speaker 2>started getting their literature, creation magazine, Journal of Creation Thing

37
00:02:00.480 --> 00:02:04.159
<v Speaker 2>and I became very interested in how things worked and

38
00:02:04.200 --> 00:02:08.520
<v Speaker 2>how they fitted together. So yeah, so that's really my journey.

39
00:02:10.120 --> 00:02:14.439
<v Speaker 2>I worked as an engineer. I was involved with POWERstation design,

40
00:02:14.680 --> 00:02:19.800
<v Speaker 2>POWERstation operation, POWERstation planning. In the state where I live.

41
00:02:20.599 --> 00:02:24.599
<v Speaker 2>I was involved in the planning of a hydroelectric scheme

42
00:02:26.080 --> 00:02:30.560
<v Speaker 2>which over many years and as a result of that,

43
00:02:30.879 --> 00:02:33.560
<v Speaker 2>I was interested in geology, but really more as a

44
00:02:33.599 --> 00:02:38.400
<v Speaker 2>mechanical engineer than as a geologist. But I became interested

45
00:02:38.599 --> 00:02:44.159
<v Speaker 2>in well, I couldn't see how Noah's flood, which was

46
00:02:44.639 --> 00:02:47.960
<v Speaker 2>a key thing to understanding how it or everything worked,

47
00:02:48.280 --> 00:02:51.159
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't see how that fitted in with the geologic column.

48
00:02:51.280 --> 00:02:57.000
<v Speaker 2>So I developed a little back of the envelope model

49
00:02:57.680 --> 00:03:03.560
<v Speaker 2>scheme for how it worked, and through various circumstances, I

50
00:03:03.599 --> 00:03:06.360
<v Speaker 2>was prompted to write an abstract on that and submitted

51
00:03:06.400 --> 00:03:10.919
<v Speaker 2>to a creation conference which was in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in

52
00:03:11.360 --> 00:03:14.520
<v Speaker 2>quite a number of years ago, and I remember showing

53
00:03:14.560 --> 00:03:17.479
<v Speaker 2>it to a fellow where I worked in the power industry.

54
00:03:18.280 --> 00:03:20.319
<v Speaker 2>He was not a Christian, but I showed it to

55
00:03:20.400 --> 00:03:22.960
<v Speaker 2>him and he was interested to read it. And when

56
00:03:22.960 --> 00:03:25.520
<v Speaker 2>he handed it back to me, he said, yeah, it's

57
00:03:25.639 --> 00:03:27.719
<v Speaker 2>very interesting, he said, but no one will take any

58
00:03:27.759 --> 00:03:31.919
<v Speaker 2>notice of you because you're not a geologist. You don't

59
00:03:31.960 --> 00:03:36.680
<v Speaker 2>have any geological degrees. So as a result of that,

60
00:03:36.719 --> 00:03:39.800
<v Speaker 2>it prompted me to go back as a mature student

61
00:03:39.960 --> 00:03:45.680
<v Speaker 2>and study geology. And I got a Bachelor of Earth Science,

62
00:03:45.719 --> 00:03:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Bachelor of Science in earth science, and we call it

63
00:03:49.879 --> 00:03:54.800
<v Speaker 2>an honors degree in science in earth science. And after

64
00:03:54.840 --> 00:03:59.120
<v Speaker 2>i'd done that I ended up connecting with Creation Ministries International,

65
00:03:59.479 --> 00:04:03.560
<v Speaker 2>which is where I am now as a speaker, researcher,

66
00:04:03.840 --> 00:04:07.639
<v Speaker 2>write editor everything.

67
00:04:07.879 --> 00:04:10.039
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of material there, so people should go

68
00:04:10.120 --> 00:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>check out creation dot com because we're going to kind

69
00:04:12.800 --> 00:04:15.599
<v Speaker 1>of talk about nosed flood and geology, but there's so

70
00:04:15.680 --> 00:04:19.759
<v Speaker 1>many other address there's a whole set of documentaries and

71
00:04:19.800 --> 00:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>things like that. But so you have an academic background

72
00:04:23.879 --> 00:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and applied that. Now. I've had other guests where that

73
00:04:26.279 --> 00:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>we talk about how science and creation actually people like

74
00:04:30.360 --> 00:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>the early scientist Galileo guys who categorized all the animals

75
00:04:36.480 --> 00:04:40.319
<v Speaker 1>were all Christians. But that's something has happened more recently

76
00:04:40.360 --> 00:04:43.319
<v Speaker 1>within the last couple hundred years. So you are seeing

77
00:04:43.600 --> 00:04:47.319
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of a rare different than the modern scientific

78
00:04:47.360 --> 00:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>tradition in that you're seeing things through a biblical worldview.

79
00:04:51.800 --> 00:04:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Correct, Yes, yeah, that's correct. All the geology started with

80
00:04:55.639 --> 00:04:59.959
<v Speaker 2>the biblical worldview, and it's mentioned in the science degree

81
00:05:00.120 --> 00:05:03.079
<v Speaker 2>in various science textbooks, but only as a throwaway line

82
00:05:03.199 --> 00:05:06.279
<v Speaker 2>and sort of can you believe they used to believe

83
00:05:06.360 --> 00:05:10.360
<v Speaker 2>the Bible, but now we understand science and that sort

84
00:05:10.399 --> 00:05:15.160
<v Speaker 2>of thing. So geology does have a Christian heritage as

85
00:05:15.480 --> 00:05:21.839
<v Speaker 2>one of the early pioneers of geology, Nicholas Tino. He

86
00:05:21.920 --> 00:05:24.680
<v Speaker 2>lived in the sixteen hundreds and he wrote a book

87
00:05:25.639 --> 00:05:30.680
<v Speaker 2>about geology which is used even today. His principles are

88
00:05:31.199 --> 00:05:33.639
<v Speaker 2>sort of the very first principles that you learned do

89
00:05:33.680 --> 00:05:37.720
<v Speaker 2>in geology. And he was a biblical creationist. He started

90
00:05:37.720 --> 00:05:40.519
<v Speaker 2>with the Bible and used that as his way of

91
00:05:40.959 --> 00:05:45.600
<v Speaker 2>interpreting the geological history of the area where he lived

92
00:05:45.879 --> 00:05:51.120
<v Speaker 2>in Tuscany. So that's something that modern geologists don't really

93
00:05:51.160 --> 00:05:54.879
<v Speaker 2>want to know, is that these guys that they're still

94
00:05:54.920 --> 00:06:00.480
<v Speaker 2>teaching about, we're biblical creationists. And so that chain. So

95
00:06:00.560 --> 00:06:05.319
<v Speaker 2>it started out as a biblical believing the Bible, and

96
00:06:05.439 --> 00:06:11.399
<v Speaker 2>that changed in the late sixteen hundred and seventeen hundreds

97
00:06:11.439 --> 00:06:15.720
<v Speaker 2>with a change with the Enlightenment, so called Enlightenment, a

98
00:06:15.759 --> 00:06:20.120
<v Speaker 2>desire to dispense with any with the Bible and find

99
00:06:20.279 --> 00:06:26.160
<v Speaker 2>a sort of a secular, naturalistic way of explaining things.

100
00:06:26.920 --> 00:06:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Right, So this is it's marked the change, and you're

101
00:06:29.480 --> 00:06:31.839
<v Speaker 1>trying to bring that back. Like when you look at

102
00:06:31.879 --> 00:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and I know that catastrophism exists, there's all kinds of catastrophes.

103
00:06:36.199 --> 00:06:39.720
<v Speaker 1>There was like the Krakatoa exploded. There's evidence of all

104
00:06:39.720 --> 00:06:43.639
<v Speaker 1>these catastrophes. Can you talk about catastrophism in the context

105
00:06:43.680 --> 00:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>of Noah's flood and biblical history?

106
00:06:47.959 --> 00:06:50.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, no his flood, of course was a catastrophe.

107
00:06:50.800 --> 00:06:57.639
<v Speaker 2>It lasted just over twelve months, and we always hear

108
00:06:57.680 --> 00:07:02.680
<v Speaker 2>it ran for forty days and forty nights, and the

109
00:07:02.720 --> 00:07:05.199
<v Speaker 2>waters not only came from the rain, but they came

110
00:07:05.199 --> 00:07:08.480
<v Speaker 2>from under the ground. And so the waters rose, rose

111
00:07:08.519 --> 00:07:11.879
<v Speaker 2>and rose, until every high mountain under the entire heavens

112
00:07:11.920 --> 00:07:15.519
<v Speaker 2>were covered. So we read about that, and for a

113
00:07:15.600 --> 00:07:18.519
<v Speaker 2>long time I couldn't figure out how it tied in

114
00:07:18.600 --> 00:07:22.040
<v Speaker 2>with science until I read the book The Genesis Flood,

115
00:07:22.160 --> 00:07:26.240
<v Speaker 2>and Noah's flood is the key to understanding how the

116
00:07:26.240 --> 00:07:30.439
<v Speaker 2>whole world youth hits together. And so Noah's flood the

117
00:07:30.480 --> 00:07:35.879
<v Speaker 2>modern geologist. You've got a picture up there of Nicholas Tino,

118
00:07:36.079 --> 00:07:39.240
<v Speaker 2>but there's another guy called James Hutton. He was a

119
00:07:39.279 --> 00:07:43.319
<v Speaker 2>Scottish physician and he was very interested in geology, and

120
00:07:43.360 --> 00:07:48.000
<v Speaker 2>he wrote a book called Theory of the Earth, and

121
00:07:48.120 --> 00:07:51.839
<v Speaker 2>he assumed, and he made the assumption that we have

122
00:07:51.959 --> 00:07:56.879
<v Speaker 2>to explain geology by what we see happening. Now. It's

123
00:07:56.920 --> 00:08:02.759
<v Speaker 2>interesting that geology is it's different from the sort of

124
00:08:02.839 --> 00:08:07.439
<v Speaker 2>normal the sciences of chemistry and physics and those sorts

125
00:08:07.480 --> 00:08:11.920
<v Speaker 2>of things where you actually do experiments and you measure

126
00:08:11.959 --> 00:08:16.319
<v Speaker 2>things in the present. So it's the repeatable experiment. So

127
00:08:16.839 --> 00:08:19.439
<v Speaker 2>I did that as an engineer. I was very much

128
00:08:19.480 --> 00:08:23.759
<v Speaker 2>involved in fluid dynamics, and you would set up experiments

129
00:08:23.879 --> 00:08:27.720
<v Speaker 2>and make measurements and record them, and I would try

130
00:08:27.720 --> 00:08:31.120
<v Speaker 2>to get my experiments to match or see how they

131
00:08:31.160 --> 00:08:34.919
<v Speaker 2>agreed with experiments which had done in the US. And

132
00:08:34.960 --> 00:08:39.360
<v Speaker 2>as a consequence of that, that's repeatable experiments which are

133
00:08:39.399 --> 00:08:43.519
<v Speaker 2>done in the present, which can be observed and documented.

134
00:08:43.919 --> 00:08:46.840
<v Speaker 2>And so that's the power of science which gives us

135
00:08:46.879 --> 00:08:51.519
<v Speaker 2>some modern technology. But when it comes to geology, you

136
00:08:51.679 --> 00:08:55.240
<v Speaker 2>can't go back in time to see what actually happened.

137
00:08:55.840 --> 00:08:58.799
<v Speaker 2>You have to make assumptions. So we can make the

138
00:08:59.200 --> 00:09:03.360
<v Speaker 2>observation in the present. We can look at the rocks

139
00:09:03.399 --> 00:09:06.360
<v Speaker 2>and see how they're related, and look at the landscapes,

140
00:09:06.679 --> 00:09:08.759
<v Speaker 2>and we can do all those sorts of measurements on

141
00:09:08.799 --> 00:09:12.279
<v Speaker 2>the fossils in the present. But the question how did

142
00:09:12.320 --> 00:09:16.519
<v Speaker 2>they get here? Is how do you do that? Well?

143
00:09:16.799 --> 00:09:19.840
<v Speaker 2>James Hutton is the guy. He lived in the sixteen hundreds.

144
00:09:19.879 --> 00:09:22.559
<v Speaker 2>He died in the late sixteen hundreds, I think it was,

145
00:09:23.320 --> 00:09:26.720
<v Speaker 2>And he is the guy that basically said, well, you

146
00:09:26.879 --> 00:09:31.200
<v Speaker 2>have to use what we can see happening now, so

147
00:09:31.279 --> 00:09:35.639
<v Speaker 2>we can see things happening now, and we assume it's

148
00:09:35.720 --> 00:09:38.679
<v Speaker 2>always been like that. So that was James Hutton's assumption.

149
00:09:39.000 --> 00:09:43.480
<v Speaker 2>It's called the principle of uniformitarianism. And as a consequence

150
00:09:43.519 --> 00:09:47.919
<v Speaker 2>of that, you end up with an earth that is untold,

151
00:09:48.039 --> 00:09:52.399
<v Speaker 2>eons of time old. It's sort of James Hutton said,

152
00:09:52.639 --> 00:09:57.879
<v Speaker 2>there's no vestige of a beginning, no sign of an answer.

153
00:09:57.919 --> 00:10:03.200
<v Speaker 2>He had an idea of an eternal cyclic called geological processes.

154
00:10:03.360 --> 00:10:08.480
<v Speaker 2>It's called the rock cycle. It's been adapted into So

155
00:10:08.759 --> 00:10:12.159
<v Speaker 2>that's the new philosophy that came in, and based on

156
00:10:12.240 --> 00:10:16.879
<v Speaker 2>that philosophy, Darwin then he was very interested in geology,

157
00:10:16.919 --> 00:10:21.639
<v Speaker 2>but he applied that. He applied that to the idea

158
00:10:21.679 --> 00:10:25.960
<v Speaker 2>of biology, and so he used the slow and gradual

159
00:10:26.080 --> 00:10:29.840
<v Speaker 2>changes in biology. So that's where the modern philosophies come in.

160
00:10:29.879 --> 00:10:34.039
<v Speaker 2>And that's basically it's really naturalism, the idea that everything

161
00:10:34.279 --> 00:10:38.879
<v Speaker 2>made itself by natural processes. But it came in through geology.

162
00:10:39.679 --> 00:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Right, So you're saying just to we state that you're

163
00:10:41.879 --> 00:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>saying that Darwinism came out of an understanding of geology.

164
00:10:45.480 --> 00:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Correct of absolutely. Okay, So there's different interpretations of the

165
00:10:51.120 --> 00:10:53.679
<v Speaker 1>fossil record, right, So you have this different you have

166
00:10:53.759 --> 00:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the different strata. You show that in some of your talks,

167
00:10:56.799 --> 00:11:00.440
<v Speaker 1>but there's also kind of a different stratification of ages

168
00:11:00.559 --> 00:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>or playsta scene or of these ages. How this is

169
00:11:04.600 --> 00:11:09.279
<v Speaker 1>the geologic time scale, So how is the modern science

170
00:11:09.279 --> 00:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>interpreting this and how do you interpret this?

171
00:11:12.720 --> 00:11:16.279
<v Speaker 2>So basically, the geologists do a great job as far

172
00:11:16.360 --> 00:11:20.120
<v Speaker 2>as you know, making observations of the rocks, and what

173
00:11:20.159 --> 00:11:24.000
<v Speaker 2>you've got up there is a geological timescale. And so

174
00:11:24.080 --> 00:11:28.759
<v Speaker 2>that came out of the eighteen hundreds where they as

175
00:11:28.799 --> 00:11:32.399
<v Speaker 2>they started exploring things, they started naming things, and so

176
00:11:32.480 --> 00:11:35.360
<v Speaker 2>they give the rocks different names, like the rocks around

177
00:11:35.480 --> 00:11:40.720
<v Speaker 2>of Devon in England we're called the Devonian, the Chalk

178
00:11:40.840 --> 00:11:43.919
<v Speaker 2>rocks and the English Channel on the British coast were

179
00:11:43.960 --> 00:11:48.639
<v Speaker 2>called the Cretaceous. So they gave them names to document them,

180
00:11:48.679 --> 00:11:51.919
<v Speaker 2>and that's what appears in the geologic column. So you've

181
00:11:52.200 --> 00:11:55.720
<v Speaker 2>you've got the Cambrian which came out of Wales, which

182
00:11:55.759 --> 00:11:58.480
<v Speaker 2>what used to be called the Cambria, and then you've

183
00:11:58.480 --> 00:12:01.480
<v Speaker 2>got then we have things like the Devonian and the

184
00:12:02.720 --> 00:12:09.679
<v Speaker 2>Carboniferous where the coal deposits in England. So that's the observation.

185
00:12:10.000 --> 00:12:13.840
<v Speaker 2>So when you look at the geologic column, basically it's

186
00:12:14.240 --> 00:12:18.240
<v Speaker 2>a record of what's actually observed and the names are fine,

187
00:12:18.919 --> 00:12:22.799
<v Speaker 2>but the dates along the side, which they've got dates.

188
00:12:23.320 --> 00:12:26.200
<v Speaker 2>The Cambrian is sort of five hundred million years old,

189
00:12:26.240 --> 00:12:29.159
<v Speaker 2>six hundred million years old. You've got the Devonian three

190
00:12:29.200 --> 00:12:32.600
<v Speaker 2>hundred million years old. So those dates come out of

191
00:12:32.720 --> 00:12:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Hutton's assumption that present processes are enough to explain the rocks,

192
00:12:40.159 --> 00:12:43.799
<v Speaker 2>and so out of that assumption comes along eons of time.

193
00:12:44.200 --> 00:12:46.720
<v Speaker 2>So the eons of time were there back in the

194
00:12:47.200 --> 00:12:49.879
<v Speaker 2>early eighteen hundreds, even before that, back in the late

195
00:12:49.919 --> 00:12:54.759
<v Speaker 2>seventeen hundreds. This concept of eons of time, and it

196
00:12:54.840 --> 00:12:59.639
<v Speaker 2>comes from assuming that the present processes have always operated

197
00:12:59.639 --> 00:13:02.080
<v Speaker 2>the way they have, and so the eons of time

198
00:13:02.200 --> 00:13:07.840
<v Speaker 2>was long before radioactive dating. Radioactive radioactivity was discovered in

199
00:13:07.919 --> 00:13:11.960
<v Speaker 2>the late eighteen hundreds and that was applied to dating,

200
00:13:12.399 --> 00:13:15.279
<v Speaker 2>you know, radioactive dating in the early nineteen hundreds, and

201
00:13:15.320 --> 00:13:18.480
<v Speaker 2>it's a flood now. And people think that the long

202
00:13:18.559 --> 00:13:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Ages were discovered by radioactive dating, but it wasn't. It

203
00:13:22.559 --> 00:13:27.679
<v Speaker 2>comes out of an assumption. Assumption is that is that

204
00:13:27.720 --> 00:13:31.039
<v Speaker 2>the present processes have always operated the way they have

205
00:13:31.480 --> 00:13:36.440
<v Speaker 2>and that the global flood described in Genesis was not

206
00:13:36.559 --> 00:13:39.639
<v Speaker 2>a real event and it did not impact their globe

207
00:13:39.879 --> 00:13:42.840
<v Speaker 2>and so we can ignore it. So that's basically the assumption.

208
00:13:43.279 --> 00:13:45.879
<v Speaker 1>But there is proofs outside of the Bible that the

209
00:13:45.919 --> 00:13:49.080
<v Speaker 1>flood existed. I think, like in sixteen or eighteen. Cultures

210
00:13:49.480 --> 00:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>have some type of myth that involves a flood. So

211
00:13:52.240 --> 00:13:54.919
<v Speaker 1>there is in human records the event of something of

212
00:13:54.919 --> 00:13:57.559
<v Speaker 1>the giant watering. And I think you even mentioned and

213
00:13:57.679 --> 00:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I was aware of this that even at the highest peaks,

214
00:14:01.240 --> 00:14:03.879
<v Speaker 1>and this is a statistic, is a fact, is that

215
00:14:04.320 --> 00:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>there's records of water somehow being there, or are records

216
00:14:09.200 --> 00:14:12.759
<v Speaker 1>of fossils or remnants of aquatic life.

217
00:14:12.840 --> 00:14:16.279
<v Speaker 2>Right, yes, at the top of Mount Everest has got

218
00:14:16.759 --> 00:14:22.080
<v Speaker 2>marine fossils, it's got sea lilies, and that the buds

219
00:14:22.120 --> 00:14:24.360
<v Speaker 2>and stems of Cea lilies have been recovered from up

220
00:14:24.399 --> 00:14:28.480
<v Speaker 2>the top of Mount Everest. So the idea of fossils

221
00:14:28.720 --> 00:14:33.159
<v Speaker 2>and being on the top of mountains. Everybody knows that

222
00:14:33.159 --> 00:14:35.639
<v Speaker 2>that's the case. But that's one of the evidences that

223
00:14:35.840 --> 00:14:39.759
<v Speaker 2>what you'd expect from a global flood. The other thing

224
00:14:39.799 --> 00:14:44.320
<v Speaker 2>that's important is to understand the movements of the crust

225
00:14:44.320 --> 00:14:48.360
<v Speaker 2>of the Earth, the tectonics that occurred, so the flood

226
00:14:48.559 --> 00:14:53.639
<v Speaker 2>was just didn't come up. It involved a huge cataclysm

227
00:14:54.159 --> 00:14:58.679
<v Speaker 2>on the Earth where the crusts of the Earth was

228
00:14:59.200 --> 00:15:04.279
<v Speaker 2>fractured and it was folded, and sediments were deposited, they

229
00:15:04.279 --> 00:15:07.879
<v Speaker 2>were metamorphosed, and then they were folded, and just an

230
00:15:07.919 --> 00:15:12.919
<v Speaker 2>ongoing process which occurred. And I liken it to the

231
00:15:13.799 --> 00:15:16.720
<v Speaker 2>it's not a very good analogy really, but the sinking

232
00:15:16.759 --> 00:15:19.759
<v Speaker 2>of the Titanic. You know, it took about three hours,

233
00:15:19.759 --> 00:15:24.000
<v Speaker 2>but it was a process where there was a gash

234
00:15:24.080 --> 00:15:26.519
<v Speaker 2>in the side and then the water filled it up,

235
00:15:26.559 --> 00:15:29.879
<v Speaker 2>and then the ship listed and then it you know,

236
00:15:30.000 --> 00:15:33.159
<v Speaker 2>it broke open, and you know, so there's this ongoing

237
00:15:33.200 --> 00:15:37.720
<v Speaker 2>processes which occurred as a result of the sinking of

238
00:15:37.759 --> 00:15:40.200
<v Speaker 2>the Titanic. But it's the same thing on the Earth.

239
00:15:40.200 --> 00:15:44.759
<v Speaker 2>There's ongoing processes which occurred over this one year period,

240
00:15:45.720 --> 00:15:50.440
<v Speaker 2>enormous processes, and today you know, geologists with these long

241
00:15:50.480 --> 00:15:54.759
<v Speaker 2>age glasses try to interpret it in terms of slow

242
00:15:54.879 --> 00:15:59.320
<v Speaker 2>and gradual over millions of years.

243
00:15:58.879 --> 00:16:02.759
<v Speaker 1>So that worldview is what the earth is a built

244
00:16:02.799 --> 00:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>like a billion years old or something like that. And

245
00:16:05.000 --> 00:16:09.759
<v Speaker 1>you do you have like a literal biblical worldview that's

246
00:16:09.799 --> 00:16:12.879
<v Speaker 1>like similar to the time, like how Jews date time

247
00:16:13.679 --> 00:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it started.

248
00:16:16.159 --> 00:16:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, when you think about the past, how do we

249
00:16:18.360 --> 00:16:24.000
<v Speaker 2>know the date of anything? Basically it's history. Without history,

250
00:16:24.080 --> 00:16:26.960
<v Speaker 2>it's virtually impossible to be able to put a date

251
00:16:27.039 --> 00:16:31.120
<v Speaker 2>on something. And I use analogies like timing of a

252
00:16:31.200 --> 00:16:34.159
<v Speaker 2>swimming race. You know, if you didn't if you didn't

253
00:16:35.080 --> 00:16:39.159
<v Speaker 2>observe the timepiece when the race started, you can't know

254
00:16:39.240 --> 00:16:41.840
<v Speaker 2>what the time was when the race finished, how long

255
00:16:41.879 --> 00:16:48.519
<v Speaker 2>it took. So I look at the Bible. Is a

256
00:16:48.720 --> 00:16:51.639
<v Speaker 2>history book, consider it to be a history book, a

257
00:16:51.759 --> 00:16:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Sherman to be a history book. There's good evidence for that,

258
00:16:54.919 --> 00:16:58.320
<v Speaker 2>and there's good reasons for that. And so assuming is

259
00:16:58.320 --> 00:17:03.200
<v Speaker 2>a history book, the chronological information is very clear. It's

260
00:17:03.240 --> 00:17:06.440
<v Speaker 2>about four and a half thousand years ago to the flood,

261
00:17:06.960 --> 00:17:10.839
<v Speaker 2>and before that another seven eight hundred years. That's about

262
00:17:11.359 --> 00:17:18.119
<v Speaker 2>six thousand years to the creation event. And so if

263
00:17:18.160 --> 00:17:20.759
<v Speaker 2>you don't have that it's really had to actually put

264
00:17:20.759 --> 00:17:21.720
<v Speaker 2>a date on anything.

265
00:17:22.160 --> 00:17:24.599
<v Speaker 1>Right then, so you believe in the now do you

266
00:17:24.720 --> 00:17:28.119
<v Speaker 1>also believe that the Genesis account the seven days as

267
00:17:28.279 --> 00:17:32.519
<v Speaker 1>literal as well? So all the events, so those are literal?

268
00:17:33.160 --> 00:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Then what in that? So the biblical worldview and then

269
00:17:36.920 --> 00:17:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the modern science worldview or different? So how do you

270
00:17:41.400 --> 00:17:44.799
<v Speaker 1>address the kind of view that there's these so you see,

271
00:17:44.960 --> 00:17:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you think these scales are almost like evil evolution where

272
00:17:49.240 --> 00:17:51.599
<v Speaker 1>there's really no proof, they're just putting times and dates

273
00:17:51.599 --> 00:17:53.839
<v Speaker 1>on that. How do you square the biblical worldview with

274
00:17:53.920 --> 00:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>this modern science worldview?

275
00:17:56.000 --> 00:17:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, he used the word worldview, and willview is a

276
00:17:59.519 --> 00:18:03.240
<v Speaker 2>way of looking at the world. It involves beliefs, our

277
00:18:03.279 --> 00:18:06.759
<v Speaker 2>belief system. And so when you say the science worldview,

278
00:18:08.279 --> 00:18:14.119
<v Speaker 2>I would call that the naturalistic worldview. Right, So there's

279
00:18:14.200 --> 00:18:19.000
<v Speaker 2>the there's a science of naturalism where the assumption is

280
00:18:19.039 --> 00:18:23.599
<v Speaker 2>that everything happened by natural processes and it all made itself.

281
00:18:24.119 --> 00:18:28.119
<v Speaker 2>So that's our worldview assumption. And then you've got the

282
00:18:28.200 --> 00:18:32.880
<v Speaker 2>assumption that the Bible's recording true history, so you've got

283
00:18:32.920 --> 00:18:36.480
<v Speaker 2>the science that comes out of that assumption. So it's

284
00:18:36.519 --> 00:18:42.279
<v Speaker 2>not science versus faith it's basically it's two faiths and

285
00:18:42.359 --> 00:18:47.440
<v Speaker 2>the science of these two different faiths. And so as creationists,

286
00:18:48.039 --> 00:18:51.640
<v Speaker 2>we accept everything that's observed, you know, the anything that

287
00:18:51.960 --> 00:18:57.119
<v Speaker 2>evolutionists observe and document and measure, they're they're the facts.

288
00:18:57.160 --> 00:19:01.559
<v Speaker 2>It's the interpretations that we look at differently. We place

289
00:19:01.640 --> 00:19:05.279
<v Speaker 2>different interpretations on these, just the same way that the

290
00:19:05.319 --> 00:19:09.480
<v Speaker 2>people who have the naturalistic belief system they interpret it

291
00:19:09.559 --> 00:19:11.720
<v Speaker 2>within that belief system.

292
00:19:12.240 --> 00:19:17.799
<v Speaker 1>So how does the creationists interpret the kind of geologic

293
00:19:17.880 --> 00:19:22.319
<v Speaker 1>not the record, but like you know, the record of

294
00:19:22.480 --> 00:19:25.559
<v Speaker 1>animals that have been caught in you know, dirt or whatever.

295
00:19:25.640 --> 00:19:31.559
<v Speaker 1>That's all due to the events like the flood. Is

296
00:19:31.559 --> 00:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that right?

297
00:19:32.920 --> 00:19:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, basically most of the most of the geologic system

298
00:19:39.400 --> 00:19:43.240
<v Speaker 2>was created formed during the Noah's flood. It was a

299
00:19:43.279 --> 00:19:48.319
<v Speaker 2>monstrous event. And what is what we see on the earth,

300
00:19:48.319 --> 00:19:53.359
<v Speaker 2>what we have access to is basically goes from the

301
00:19:53.400 --> 00:19:57.000
<v Speaker 2>beginning of the flood where there was a huge you know,

302
00:19:57.079 --> 00:20:03.920
<v Speaker 2>it was a highly energetic catastrophe beginning that occurred, and

303
00:20:04.039 --> 00:20:07.359
<v Speaker 2>that goes from the pre Cambrian you know, and there

304
00:20:07.720 --> 00:20:11.480
<v Speaker 2>would be dates on that of two billion years and

305
00:20:11.559 --> 00:20:14.960
<v Speaker 2>so that was we would say, no, it's not two

306
00:20:15.000 --> 00:20:17.880
<v Speaker 2>billion years. It was early in the flood. It was

307
00:20:17.920 --> 00:20:19.759
<v Speaker 2>the right of the very you know, very in the

308
00:20:19.799 --> 00:20:22.720
<v Speaker 2>early weeks or days and weeks, and then it goes

309
00:20:22.799 --> 00:20:28.920
<v Speaker 2>right through to basically to the Mesozoic, which is and

310
00:20:28.960 --> 00:20:33.799
<v Speaker 2>the Cenozoic, which is the very most recent rocks would

311
00:20:33.880 --> 00:20:36.279
<v Speaker 2>were formed towards the end of the flood. So not

312
00:20:36.400 --> 00:20:40.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot was formed after the flood because humans have

313
00:20:40.519 --> 00:20:42.839
<v Speaker 2>to live on the earth, and so you have the

314
00:20:42.880 --> 00:20:46.240
<v Speaker 2>ice age after the flood. So basically the order on

315
00:20:46.319 --> 00:20:50.920
<v Speaker 2>the geologic column. A friend of mine, a colleague, Michael Ord,

316
00:20:50.960 --> 00:20:54.720
<v Speaker 2>has written an article called, you know, the called the

317
00:20:54.799 --> 00:21:00.160
<v Speaker 2>geologic column is a general order of the flood, but

318
00:21:00.240 --> 00:21:05.759
<v Speaker 2>it's there are exceptions to it, and so that's that's the.

319
00:21:07.559 --> 00:21:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Soul you would interpret like all of the kind of

320
00:21:11.519 --> 00:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>wear and tear like at you know, some of these

321
00:21:15.559 --> 00:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Grand Canyon or something like that, that would all be

322
00:21:18.079 --> 00:21:21.680
<v Speaker 1>post flood where in tears that corrected.

323
00:21:21.920 --> 00:21:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, the Grand Canyon was laid down by the floodwaters

324
00:21:25.200 --> 00:21:28.359
<v Speaker 2>as the waters were rising. So you have these you know,

325
00:21:28.599 --> 00:21:35.799
<v Speaker 2>very horizontal, long thin layers a roupt these strata which

326
00:21:35.920 --> 00:21:38.680
<v Speaker 2>they extend for hundreds of kilometers. So that was the

327
00:21:38.720 --> 00:21:43.559
<v Speaker 2>water's washing sediments into the area, and then you have

328
00:21:43.759 --> 00:21:47.119
<v Speaker 2>the floid waters of Noah's flood receding when they covered

329
00:21:47.119 --> 00:21:50.400
<v Speaker 2>the whole area, that carved the flat surfaces at the top.

330
00:21:50.480 --> 00:21:52.839
<v Speaker 2>You see a lot of flat surfaces in the Grand Canyon.

331
00:21:53.160 --> 00:21:56.400
<v Speaker 2>And then the canyon itself was carved by the tail

332
00:21:56.519 --> 00:21:59.319
<v Speaker 2>end of the flood as the flood of the waters

333
00:21:59.319 --> 00:22:04.200
<v Speaker 2>were almost drained off, and it was carved the canyon itself.

334
00:22:04.480 --> 00:22:08.160
<v Speaker 2>And there's some amazing features in the canyon which point

335
00:22:08.200 --> 00:22:13.359
<v Speaker 2>to the fact that there was water ponded on the

336
00:22:13.400 --> 00:22:18.680
<v Speaker 2>top of the plateau there which which drained and formed

337
00:22:18.720 --> 00:22:24.079
<v Speaker 2>these side canyons and this fractal shape for the canyon.

338
00:22:24.480 --> 00:22:27.920
<v Speaker 2>So it's very fascinating and there's articles on creation dot

339
00:22:27.920 --> 00:22:32.119
<v Speaker 2>Com about that, about the carving of the Grand Canyon.

340
00:22:32.880 --> 00:22:35.160
<v Speaker 1>So what are the things that are on top that

341
00:22:35.200 --> 00:22:37.640
<v Speaker 1>indicate that there was water there.

342
00:22:38.839 --> 00:22:43.119
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's sediments which have been deposited by water that's

343
00:22:43.480 --> 00:22:46.799
<v Speaker 2>on the canyon. Plus there's fossils in the sediments which

344
00:22:46.839 --> 00:22:50.279
<v Speaker 2>indicate that they were you know, that these things were

345
00:22:50.319 --> 00:22:53.880
<v Speaker 2>buried in water. And then what else. The fact that

346
00:22:53.920 --> 00:22:57.480
<v Speaker 2>the canyons carved flat indicates that some sort of watery

347
00:22:57.599 --> 00:23:04.119
<v Speaker 2>process has carved it flat. Now please continue interesting with

348
00:23:04.200 --> 00:23:08.880
<v Speaker 2>the canyon. If you look at the canyon, there's we've

349
00:23:08.880 --> 00:23:12.119
<v Speaker 2>got this belief system of geologists have this belief system,

350
00:23:12.400 --> 00:23:18.039
<v Speaker 2>the Long Age uniformitarian geologists. They don't like that term

351
00:23:18.079 --> 00:23:21.359
<v Speaker 2>so much these days. But the people who believe that

352
00:23:21.440 --> 00:23:25.079
<v Speaker 2>everything happened by slow and gradual processes and there never

353
00:23:25.279 --> 00:23:29.440
<v Speaker 2>was a global flood, that's their belief. They see, for example,

354
00:23:29.559 --> 00:23:33.680
<v Speaker 2>there's some one of the layers in the Grand Canyon

355
00:23:33.799 --> 00:23:38.200
<v Speaker 2>is called the Coconino Sandstone, which looks like it's got

356
00:23:38.599 --> 00:23:42.480
<v Speaker 2>very big sand dunes in it, very large sand dunes.

357
00:23:43.000 --> 00:23:50.839
<v Speaker 2>And because they're so large, the Long Age geologists can't

358
00:23:50.839 --> 00:23:56.039
<v Speaker 2>interpret those as water laid because it would mean a

359
00:23:56.200 --> 00:24:01.839
<v Speaker 2>watery flood of biblical proportion. And so whenever they come

360
00:24:01.880 --> 00:24:04.680
<v Speaker 2>across something like this, they say, oh, it must have

361
00:24:04.759 --> 00:24:08.359
<v Speaker 2>formed in a desert, right, So they interpret it as

362
00:24:08.400 --> 00:24:11.559
<v Speaker 2>forming in a desert because of the large sand dunes.

363
00:24:11.599 --> 00:24:15.599
<v Speaker 2>But there's quite strong evidence that these that point to

364
00:24:15.640 --> 00:24:20.039
<v Speaker 2>it actually forming in water. And it indicates how these

365
00:24:20.079 --> 00:24:24.880
<v Speaker 2>interpretations lead us down a wrong path, you know, when

366
00:24:24.880 --> 00:24:26.880
<v Speaker 2>they say there was a desert and then they then

367
00:24:27.039 --> 00:24:32.599
<v Speaker 2>use it against against a biblical geologists they see, how

368
00:24:32.640 --> 00:24:35.119
<v Speaker 2>could you possibly have a desert in the middle of

369
00:24:35.160 --> 00:24:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Noah's flood, And it comes from their interpretation, not the

370
00:24:40.039 --> 00:24:42.839
<v Speaker 2>actual fact, that it's not a fact itself.

371
00:24:44.039 --> 00:24:46.880
<v Speaker 1>And what other geologic proofs are there for people who

372
00:24:46.880 --> 00:24:51.119
<v Speaker 1>aren't aware of Creation and Noah's flood? Can you think

373
00:24:51.160 --> 00:24:52.039
<v Speaker 1>any other ones talking?

374
00:24:52.640 --> 00:24:56.319
<v Speaker 2>Oh, there's lots of evidences for Noah's flood. I talked

375
00:24:56.359 --> 00:25:01.039
<v Speaker 2>about the flat the flat surfaces there all around the world.

376
00:25:01.079 --> 00:25:04.240
<v Speaker 2>You find these flat surfaces on the top of plateaus

377
00:25:04.519 --> 00:25:09.000
<v Speaker 2>where there's been erosion. That's an evidence of the waters

378
00:25:09.000 --> 00:25:13.400
<v Speaker 2>of Noah's flood covering the whole area. Another evidence is

379
00:25:13.920 --> 00:25:16.920
<v Speaker 2>as the waters, the waters of Noah's flood, they covered

380
00:25:16.920 --> 00:25:20.960
<v Speaker 2>the whole continents of North America and Asia and all

381
00:25:21.000 --> 00:25:25.359
<v Speaker 2>the places the whole of the world. When the waters

382
00:25:25.400 --> 00:25:30.960
<v Speaker 2>then started to drain off, the ocean basins sank gradually sank,

383
00:25:31.480 --> 00:25:36.599
<v Speaker 2>and the continents were uplifted. And mainstream geologists would say

384
00:25:36.640 --> 00:25:40.079
<v Speaker 2>that they talk about the the uplift of the continent.

385
00:25:40.200 --> 00:25:43.920
<v Speaker 2>So it's it's accepted that this happened. So creation is

386
00:25:44.960 --> 00:25:48.400
<v Speaker 2>see that as being the process as which ended the flood,

387
00:25:48.960 --> 00:25:52.400
<v Speaker 2>and as the waters flowed off, they eroded the surface,

388
00:25:52.960 --> 00:25:58.960
<v Speaker 2>and they eroded out lots of rocks. And there's particularly

389
00:25:59.000 --> 00:26:02.920
<v Speaker 2>one sort of very hard rock called a qurtzite, which

390
00:26:02.960 --> 00:26:06.480
<v Speaker 2>were eroded from the rocky mountains. And these were theyse

391
00:26:06.519 --> 00:26:11.200
<v Speaker 2>were carried by water to the west and to the east,

392
00:26:11.640 --> 00:26:14.440
<v Speaker 2>and so you have what they these court side boulders.

393
00:26:14.440 --> 00:26:18.960
<v Speaker 2>They can be up to eighteen inches across. They're rounded

394
00:26:19.240 --> 00:26:22.640
<v Speaker 2>like they're being rounded in a water in being carried

395
00:26:22.640 --> 00:26:25.960
<v Speaker 2>along by a watery river, and they cover such a

396
00:26:26.000 --> 00:26:30.839
<v Speaker 2>huge area. That's that's an evidence of enormous water flows

397
00:26:31.400 --> 00:26:34.240
<v Speaker 2>which were connected with the tail end of the flood

398
00:26:34.559 --> 00:26:37.599
<v Speaker 2>as the waters were flowing off the continents.

399
00:26:38.440 --> 00:26:40.759
<v Speaker 1>And what other Is there any other proofs other than

400
00:26:40.759 --> 00:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that that you would add to the proofs of Creasia.

401
00:26:46.119 --> 00:26:49.000
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't call it proofs. I wouldn't call it proofs.

402
00:26:49.039 --> 00:26:54.559
<v Speaker 2>I'd say evidence. See, when you talk about the naturalistic

403
00:26:55.920 --> 00:27:03.000
<v Speaker 2>uniformitarian worldview, they interpret the evidence within that framework, and

404
00:27:03.119 --> 00:27:07.559
<v Speaker 2>then that interpretation is used as a proof, but strictly

405
00:27:07.599 --> 00:27:11.559
<v Speaker 2>it's not. It's an interpretation. And so one of the

406
00:27:11.599 --> 00:27:18.119
<v Speaker 2>other evidence is of the ublical worldview. Is I talked

407
00:27:18.119 --> 00:27:21.759
<v Speaker 2>about the flat surfaces. I talked about the Cortsoe boulders.

408
00:27:22.279 --> 00:27:25.759
<v Speaker 2>As the waters of Noah's flood reduced even further, you

409
00:27:25.880 --> 00:27:31.599
<v Speaker 2>find that the waters there's rivers which flow through mountain ranges,

410
00:27:32.400 --> 00:27:38.279
<v Speaker 2>which is surprising because the landscape is supposed to have

411
00:27:38.440 --> 00:27:46.079
<v Speaker 2>been eroded by rainfall and snow and ice and that,

412
00:27:46.480 --> 00:27:50.240
<v Speaker 2>and so you'd expect the rivers to flow around the

413
00:27:50.319 --> 00:27:53.960
<v Speaker 2>mountain ranges. But we find that they all over the world.

414
00:27:54.000 --> 00:27:58.680
<v Speaker 2>They flow through mountain ranges, and it's called the water gap. Well,

415
00:27:58.720 --> 00:28:03.000
<v Speaker 2>that's easily explained as a consequence of Noah's flood. As

416
00:28:03.039 --> 00:28:07.000
<v Speaker 2>the waters were going down, eventually parts of the earth

417
00:28:07.160 --> 00:28:13.119
<v Speaker 2>arose above the waters, and the waters then went through gaps,

418
00:28:13.200 --> 00:28:16.119
<v Speaker 2>flowed through anything which is a bit lower, and eroded

419
00:28:16.160 --> 00:28:19.200
<v Speaker 2>that down to form a water gap. So there's water gaps,

420
00:28:19.480 --> 00:28:23.200
<v Speaker 2>hundreds and hundreds of them in the Appalachians and other

421
00:28:23.319 --> 00:28:26.039
<v Speaker 2>parts of the US. So water gaps are an evidence

422
00:28:26.079 --> 00:28:32.440
<v Speaker 2>of Noah's flood. It's quite amazing, really, it's quite amazing.

423
00:28:32.599 --> 00:28:36.440
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing, But it is amazing because I would say

424
00:28:36.440 --> 00:28:39.799
<v Speaker 1>that you're probably in a very small minority amongst people

425
00:28:39.839 --> 00:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>who interpret, like you said, interpret the signs and the

426
00:28:45.000 --> 00:28:48.319
<v Speaker 1>deeds and the fossil record and things like that. So

427
00:28:48.440 --> 00:28:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the fossil record is what you're saying is has been

428
00:28:51.759 --> 00:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>laid down during the flood events leading through the flood

429
00:28:56.079 --> 00:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and then the receding of the waters is what made

430
00:28:59.000 --> 00:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the fossil records not something gotcha?

431
00:29:02.519 --> 00:29:03.039
<v Speaker 2>That's right?

432
00:29:03.599 --> 00:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>And what has have you debated kind of the modern

433
00:29:07.599 --> 00:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>naturalists and uh, you know, gradualists and what is your

434
00:29:12.720 --> 00:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>experience with that? I mean, I assume it's similar to

435
00:29:15.759 --> 00:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>a Christian debating like an evolutionary biologist or something like that.

436
00:29:19.720 --> 00:29:23.960
<v Speaker 1>But what's the can you relate or tell about kind

437
00:29:23.960 --> 00:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of what happens in your telling this view to kind

438
00:29:27.240 --> 00:29:28.519
<v Speaker 1>of modern science.

439
00:29:29.160 --> 00:29:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Debates have occurred. I'm in writing on pens and paper

440
00:29:34.279 --> 00:29:39.000
<v Speaker 2>articles and that which are published. And so the flood

441
00:29:39.160 --> 00:29:43.480
<v Speaker 2>is so significant that it's very much a focus of opposition.

442
00:29:43.920 --> 00:29:48.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, like if if if the flood occurred and

443
00:29:48.279 --> 00:29:51.279
<v Speaker 2>if the world is young, then the then evolution is

444
00:29:51.319 --> 00:29:53.640
<v Speaker 2>dead in the water. There's no way that there's no

445
00:29:53.680 --> 00:29:56.079
<v Speaker 2>time for evolution to happen, so that it kills the

446
00:29:56.119 --> 00:30:01.319
<v Speaker 2>whole naturalistic worldview. And so the opposition into flood geology

447
00:30:01.559 --> 00:30:05.480
<v Speaker 2>is very strong and so you find fine people which

448
00:30:06.079 --> 00:30:09.119
<v Speaker 2>and particularly and that's connected with the Age of the Earth.

449
00:30:09.480 --> 00:30:12.559
<v Speaker 2>It's flood geology. It washes away the millions of years.

450
00:30:12.599 --> 00:30:16.559
<v Speaker 2>So and the age, the Age of the Earth, the

451
00:30:16.599 --> 00:30:19.400
<v Speaker 2>young Earth kills, it kills naturalism.

452
00:30:19.799 --> 00:30:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Right. So even this quote that I have up is

453
00:30:22.480 --> 00:30:25.079
<v Speaker 1>very important. So you see theory of evolution in geology

454
00:30:25.359 --> 00:30:30.720
<v Speaker 1>intertwined and that interpretation is the either the modern scientistical

455
00:30:30.799 --> 00:30:32.279
<v Speaker 1>view or the accretions view.

456
00:30:32.359 --> 00:30:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Right there, gotch and that's right, that's right, this guy

457
00:30:38.839 --> 00:30:42.720
<v Speaker 2>on BBC saying it's he sees that in England was

458
00:30:42.799 --> 00:30:45.519
<v Speaker 2>geology and the theory of evolution that changed us from

459
00:30:45.559 --> 00:30:46.839
<v Speaker 2>a Christian to a pagan nation.

460
00:30:47.000 --> 00:30:50.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and please continue.

461
00:30:51.400 --> 00:30:56.359
<v Speaker 2>So it's interesting that the Age of the Earth. There's

462
00:30:56.400 --> 00:30:59.400
<v Speaker 2>a book by a lady called Sherry Lewis, and she

463
00:30:59.440 --> 00:31:02.279
<v Speaker 2>wrote a book called The Dating Game, which gives something

464
00:31:02.319 --> 00:31:05.920
<v Speaker 2>about the history of the Age of the Earth. I

465
00:31:05.960 --> 00:31:08.440
<v Speaker 2>think that's that's it. And she talks about how it

466
00:31:08.559 --> 00:31:13.119
<v Speaker 2>was developed and so back in the late eighteen hundreds,

467
00:31:13.200 --> 00:31:15.519
<v Speaker 2>you know, people they tried to figure out how the

468
00:31:15.559 --> 00:31:18.240
<v Speaker 2>earth was and they used it measured the salt in

469
00:31:18.319 --> 00:31:21.000
<v Speaker 2>the ocean, how the salt in the ocean was accumulating,

470
00:31:21.440 --> 00:31:26.880
<v Speaker 2>or they measured the assumed that the Sun was gravitationally collapsing.

471
00:31:27.880 --> 00:31:31.480
<v Speaker 2>And another guy by the name of Kelvin measured how

472
00:31:31.519 --> 00:31:35.319
<v Speaker 2>the Earth was cooling, assuming it was once a molten ball,

473
00:31:35.480 --> 00:31:37.720
<v Speaker 2>how long it would take to cool. So Kelvin was

474
00:31:37.759 --> 00:31:41.440
<v Speaker 2>a thermodynamicis calvinator fridges. I don't know if you have

475
00:31:41.559 --> 00:31:44.680
<v Speaker 2>them in the States, but it comes after him, Lord Kelvin.

476
00:31:45.279 --> 00:31:48.559
<v Speaker 2>So from these guys worked out that the world was

477
00:31:48.599 --> 00:31:52.680
<v Speaker 2>about twenty million years old based on those assumptions, and

478
00:31:52.799 --> 00:31:58.119
<v Speaker 2>Charles Darwin said he said about Calvin, he said, Lord Kelvin,

479
00:31:58.440 --> 00:32:01.759
<v Speaker 2>is you know the guy that causes me more trouble

480
00:32:01.960 --> 00:32:05.119
<v Speaker 2>than anyone else. I just really dislike what he's come

481
00:32:05.200 --> 00:32:09.039
<v Speaker 2>up with because twenty million years is nowhere near enough

482
00:32:09.119 --> 00:32:14.160
<v Speaker 2>time for me for my idea of evolution, right, So

483
00:32:15.119 --> 00:32:18.279
<v Speaker 2>he said, I need an enormous amount of time before

484
00:32:18.319 --> 00:32:25.440
<v Speaker 2>the Cambrian for evolution. So that was Darwin. And so

485
00:32:25.839 --> 00:32:31.640
<v Speaker 2>basically the physicist Calvern and these others who were physicists

486
00:32:31.720 --> 00:32:36.480
<v Speaker 2>and their calculations. The geologists and the biologists didn't like

487
00:32:36.559 --> 00:32:39.599
<v Speaker 2>it because it was didn't fit in with what they

488
00:32:39.799 --> 00:32:45.200
<v Speaker 2>wanted for their theories to work, which illustrates that the

489
00:32:46.640 --> 00:32:49.599
<v Speaker 2>question is what age would you like age?

490
00:32:50.359 --> 00:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>It shouldn't be upon somebody's own opinion or something that

491
00:32:53.680 --> 00:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>fit their theory, which is.

492
00:32:55.119 --> 00:33:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Still it shouldn't be, but it is because people work

493
00:33:00.519 --> 00:33:04.759
<v Speaker 2>within a worldview, and so they look for evidence which

494
00:33:04.839 --> 00:33:06.920
<v Speaker 2>is going to support their well view, and if they

495
00:33:07.000 --> 00:33:12.279
<v Speaker 2>find evidence which contradicts it, they don't say, oh, my

496
00:33:12.400 --> 00:33:16.200
<v Speaker 2>worldview is wrong. They'll say, oh, this is going to

497
00:33:16.240 --> 00:33:19.000
<v Speaker 2>be interesting to explore this and to see how we

498
00:33:19.039 --> 00:33:23.440
<v Speaker 2>can explain that, you know, so it becomes a people

499
00:33:23.440 --> 00:33:26.559
<v Speaker 2>don't realize that that's how it works. Have you heard

500
00:33:26.599 --> 00:33:32.799
<v Speaker 2>about the dinosaur soft tissue? Have you probably heard about that? Yeah?

501
00:33:32.960 --> 00:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're finding it, they're trying to rationalize it away.

502
00:33:36.519 --> 00:33:38.119
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, can you talk a little bit about that.

503
00:33:38.839 --> 00:33:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Well, Mary Schweizer was the first person. She's the

504
00:33:42.000 --> 00:33:44.319
<v Speaker 2>one that found it at first, and of course it

505
00:33:44.400 --> 00:33:50.200
<v Speaker 2>created an enose stir about finding blood cells in dinosaur

506
00:33:50.279 --> 00:33:54.799
<v Speaker 2>bones which just looked like modern bones. She and the

507
00:33:54.839 --> 00:33:58.279
<v Speaker 2>whole issue was and she said it this way. She said,

508
00:33:59.359 --> 00:34:02.200
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't believe it. She said, I said to the

509
00:34:02.279 --> 00:34:08.239
<v Speaker 2>lab technician, these bones are seventy million years old. How

510
00:34:08.280 --> 00:34:13.599
<v Speaker 2>could blood cells survive that long? So that's worldview, right.

511
00:34:13.679 --> 00:34:19.119
<v Speaker 2>She didn't say these blood cells prove that the world

512
00:34:19.239 --> 00:34:22.760
<v Speaker 2>is not seventy million years old. What she said is

513
00:34:22.840 --> 00:34:25.320
<v Speaker 2>I've made a discovery. We're going to have to get

514
00:34:25.400 --> 00:34:29.719
<v Speaker 2>lots of more research to find out how to explain

515
00:34:29.800 --> 00:34:32.840
<v Speaker 2>it in fitting with a seventy million year age. So

516
00:34:32.960 --> 00:34:37.559
<v Speaker 2>that's the way worldviews work, and so people accuse creationists

517
00:34:37.559 --> 00:34:41.280
<v Speaker 2>of being biased. You start with the answer, but everybody does,

518
00:34:41.599 --> 00:34:44.920
<v Speaker 2>everybody that starts with the answer, and so these world

519
00:34:45.000 --> 00:34:49.679
<v Speaker 2>views can't be falsified. You know, evolution can't be falsified.

520
00:34:50.199 --> 00:34:55.920
<v Speaker 2>It's just anything that's contrary will look for you know,

521
00:34:56.159 --> 00:34:58.400
<v Speaker 2>the person with that worldview will look for a way

522
00:34:58.400 --> 00:35:01.679
<v Speaker 2>of explaining it within within his worldview.

523
00:35:02.239 --> 00:35:05.159
<v Speaker 1>And it is interesting because, in my understanding, the geologic

524
00:35:05.280 --> 00:35:09.280
<v Speaker 1>record does not support evolutionary biology at all, because you

525
00:35:09.320 --> 00:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>don't see these changes that are supposed to be happening.

526
00:35:11.559 --> 00:35:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you find that correct?

527
00:35:13.239 --> 00:35:18.320
<v Speaker 2>That's right. The characteristics of the fossils, there's three characteristics.

528
00:35:18.519 --> 00:35:24.880
<v Speaker 2>One is they suddenly appear a particular creature and organism

529
00:35:25.280 --> 00:35:28.960
<v Speaker 2>suddenly appears, and there's it's hard to find any evidence

530
00:35:29.039 --> 00:35:35.400
<v Speaker 2>of a slowly, slowly organic trail leading up to them.

531
00:35:35.639 --> 00:35:40.679
<v Speaker 2>Once they appear, they say the same. It's called stasis.

532
00:35:40.679 --> 00:35:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Stephen J. Girl said, it's a it's a trade secret

533
00:35:45.480 --> 00:35:48.119
<v Speaker 2>of the fossil record. And the other thing is that

534
00:35:48.159 --> 00:35:53.559
<v Speaker 2>they suddenly disappear, and so so that's basically the fossil record,

535
00:35:54.119 --> 00:35:56.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, and it does not support evolution.

536
00:35:57.119 --> 00:35:59.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's interesting. I've read a little bit about Gold

537
00:35:59.679 --> 00:36:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and Doclkins in they're actually supposed they're naturalists, but their

538
00:36:04.440 --> 00:36:07.519
<v Speaker 1>cultural life is actually semi Christian, if not Christian. They

539
00:36:07.559 --> 00:36:11.079
<v Speaker 1>really like the morality of it. It's really fascinating that

540
00:36:11.119 --> 00:36:15.360
<v Speaker 1>they can be of two minds like that. Pretty fascinating. Yeah,

541
00:36:15.400 --> 00:36:17.639
<v Speaker 1>we are at about thirty five minutes. Is there anything

542
00:36:17.679 --> 00:36:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you'd like to add, anything I missed or where can

543
00:36:19.519 --> 00:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>people find your work or reach out to you in

544
00:36:21.519 --> 00:36:22.159
<v Speaker 1>social media?

545
00:36:23.599 --> 00:36:27.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Well, creation dot com. There's a lot of my

546
00:36:27.639 --> 00:36:31.519
<v Speaker 2>work's been published there. There's videos there as well as

547
00:36:31.599 --> 00:36:34.559
<v Speaker 2>lots of articles that I've written. I have a website

548
00:36:34.639 --> 00:36:39.920
<v Speaker 2>called Biblicalgeology dot net where I've tended to write a

549
00:36:40.000 --> 00:36:46.920
<v Speaker 2>material which is not of such a global interest, more

550
00:36:46.920 --> 00:36:52.320
<v Speaker 2>and more local interests. And also I'm available on Facebook.

551
00:36:52.639 --> 00:36:56.000
<v Speaker 2>I think Tasmin Walker on Facebook. People can contact me there.

552
00:36:56.280 --> 00:36:58.519
<v Speaker 1>And this is you right here right Biblical Theology and

553
00:36:58.519 --> 00:36:59.519
<v Speaker 1>Independent Voices.

554
00:36:59.440 --> 00:37:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Biblical Geology geology dot net, so to be there if

555
00:37:06.880 --> 00:37:10.000
<v Speaker 2>you go Biblical geology dot net forwards last.

556
00:37:09.880 --> 00:37:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Blogs, but it is here. Oh yeah, you have tons

557
00:37:13.840 --> 00:37:14.679
<v Speaker 1>of information here.

558
00:37:14.960 --> 00:37:17.480
<v Speaker 2>There's lots of information and there's a blog as well,

559
00:37:18.920 --> 00:37:20.239
<v Speaker 2>which is good, really good.

560
00:37:20.679 --> 00:37:23.400
<v Speaker 1>And you're on Facebook, so do you have a so

561
00:37:23.559 --> 00:37:25.960
<v Speaker 1>this is is there a way to contact you through

562
00:37:26.039 --> 00:37:27.639
<v Speaker 1>this website Biblical Geography.

563
00:37:27.719 --> 00:37:30.599
<v Speaker 2>Through the website, you can contact me. Plus through creation

564
00:37:30.760 --> 00:37:34.280
<v Speaker 2>dot com you can send an email to me and

565
00:37:34.559 --> 00:37:37.679
<v Speaker 2>you can get connected that way. That's the main way

566
00:37:37.760 --> 00:37:43.599
<v Speaker 2>that I'm available. It's interesting. I developed a biblical geological

567
00:37:43.719 --> 00:37:47.320
<v Speaker 2>model and that's what's on the Biblical Geology dot net

568
00:37:47.800 --> 00:37:52.559
<v Speaker 2>so to actually identify what parts of the geologic column

569
00:37:52.639 --> 00:37:56.599
<v Speaker 2>belong where, because when I started out as a creationist

570
00:37:56.760 --> 00:37:59.960
<v Speaker 2>and reading the creationist literature, I could not see where

571
00:38:00.119 --> 00:38:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Noah's flood fitted in the geologic column. So I have

572
00:38:04.079 --> 00:38:06.760
<v Speaker 2>and basically as a result of this, and quite a

573
00:38:06.880 --> 00:38:11.519
<v Speaker 2>number of people use it now and this particular model,

574
00:38:13.199 --> 00:38:16.159
<v Speaker 2>it's quite amazing. It starts with the Bible that assumes

575
00:38:16.760 --> 00:38:20.039
<v Speaker 2>the Bible is recording true history, and it says what

576
00:38:20.199 --> 00:38:24.079
<v Speaker 2>would have affected the geology and what would we expect

577
00:38:24.159 --> 00:38:27.719
<v Speaker 2>to see and identify to be able to pinpoint the things.

578
00:38:28.199 --> 00:38:30.440
<v Speaker 1>And this is a referencing right here right a biblical

579
00:38:30.519 --> 00:38:32.239
<v Speaker 1>geological that's it.

580
00:38:32.519 --> 00:38:35.760
<v Speaker 2>That's it now. And I presented that at the International

581
00:38:35.880 --> 00:38:40.199
<v Speaker 2>Conference of Creationism in nineteen ninety four, which is a

582
00:38:40.239 --> 00:38:44.920
<v Speaker 2>while ago, and a guy called Michael Ord picked up

583
00:38:44.960 --> 00:38:50.000
<v Speaker 2>on that, and a few others have sort of they've

584
00:38:50.320 --> 00:38:53.519
<v Speaker 2>done me a favor in that they've sort of said, well,

585
00:38:54.039 --> 00:38:56.039
<v Speaker 2>we're going to use it. So they're using it and

586
00:38:56.440 --> 00:39:01.159
<v Speaker 2>it works well. And as a consequence of that, I've

587
00:39:01.280 --> 00:39:05.440
<v Speaker 2>produced an article which has proved quite interesting. It's published

588
00:39:05.559 --> 00:39:14.000
<v Speaker 2>on creation dot com called the Geological Transformation Tool Geological

589
00:39:14.119 --> 00:39:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Transformation Tool, and that's basically anybody if when they go

590
00:39:22.280 --> 00:39:25.519
<v Speaker 2>around touring somewhere or they're reading a book about geology

591
00:39:25.639 --> 00:39:29.239
<v Speaker 2>or reading a national geographic and they start quoting dates

592
00:39:29.280 --> 00:39:31.800
<v Speaker 2>and that you can go to that tool and you

593
00:39:31.960 --> 00:39:34.679
<v Speaker 2>put the dates in. There's a I should be diagrammed

594
00:39:34.679 --> 00:39:41.239
<v Speaker 2>somewhere down there is there there, it is there, it is,

595
00:39:41.320 --> 00:39:42.039
<v Speaker 2>there's a diagram.

596
00:39:42.599 --> 00:39:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Go up a bit, Go up a bit, this dis gotcha.

597
00:39:47.559 --> 00:39:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's a diagram. So that's a geologic column, and

598
00:39:50.960 --> 00:39:55.159
<v Speaker 2>it shows where it fits within a biblical worldview. So

599
00:39:55.199 --> 00:39:58.079
<v Speaker 2>you got the waters of Noah's flood rising, the waters

600
00:39:58.119 --> 00:40:01.440
<v Speaker 2>of Noah's flood falling, and then you have the post flood.

601
00:40:01.800 --> 00:40:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Now there's a lot of debate amongst creationists about where

602
00:40:05.400 --> 00:40:08.679
<v Speaker 2>these actual lines fit, and so there's a little bit

603
00:40:08.760 --> 00:40:11.159
<v Speaker 2>of to and fro on that, and I talk about

604
00:40:11.159 --> 00:40:13.800
<v Speaker 2>that in the article, but that gives a very good

605
00:40:14.039 --> 00:40:19.599
<v Speaker 2>first base. You sort of say, well, these are Devonian rocks.

606
00:40:19.679 --> 00:40:22.360
<v Speaker 2>You go the thing, look up Devonian and you see

607
00:40:22.679 --> 00:40:25.000
<v Speaker 2>that's about as the waters we're sort of you know,

608
00:40:25.119 --> 00:40:28.119
<v Speaker 2>they're getting towards their peak and or something like that.

609
00:40:28.239 --> 00:40:30.519
<v Speaker 2>So it's a very good tool to be able to

610
00:40:30.599 --> 00:40:34.840
<v Speaker 2>find your way around. It's not its preliminary and so,

611
00:40:35.760 --> 00:40:38.239
<v Speaker 2>but it gives you a first good, good estimate.

612
00:40:39.039 --> 00:40:41.760
<v Speaker 1>So people can check that out at creation dot com.

613
00:40:41.960 --> 00:40:46.280
<v Speaker 1>And also your website is again Biblical geology dot net.

614
00:40:46.400 --> 00:40:49.079
<v Speaker 1>All one more Biblical Geology dot net.

615
00:40:49.679 --> 00:40:52.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah that's right, Bill, that's right.

616
00:40:52.960 --> 00:40:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, agree, Well that was really fascinating. It's really interesting

617
00:40:56.320 --> 00:40:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to me to hear you talk about that, because I

618
00:40:58.880 --> 00:41:00.760
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of questions about so of this, the

619
00:41:00.880 --> 00:41:05.599
<v Speaker 1>naturalism and the assumptions and the geologic record how they interpreted.

620
00:41:05.719 --> 00:41:08.159
<v Speaker 1>But I think you really made your points very well.

621
00:41:08.199 --> 00:41:10.119
<v Speaker 1>So thank you so much for your time. Really appreciate it.

622
00:41:10.639 --> 00:41:13.440
<v Speaker 2>And I appreciate you. Williams Bill, it's really great to

623
00:41:13.480 --> 00:41:16.840
<v Speaker 2>be hout to join your program. William Ramsey Investigates. All

624
00:41:16.840 --> 00:41:17.440
<v Speaker 2>the best to you.

625
00:41:18.000 --> 00:41:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Likewise, God bless, godless,
