WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.159 --> 00:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>It's night with Dan Ray. I'm telling you easy Boston's Radio.

2
00:00:08.160 --> 00:00:12.960
<v Speaker 2>All Right, we are two weeks away, two weeks away

3
00:00:13.960 --> 00:00:18.960
<v Speaker 2>from the from the election of twenty twenty four. The

4
00:00:19.000 --> 00:00:23.679
<v Speaker 2>election has seemed to have been two years away, four

5
00:00:23.760 --> 00:00:26.120
<v Speaker 2>years away, or ten years away, and now it's on

6
00:00:26.160 --> 00:00:30.719
<v Speaker 2>our doorstep with us as Spencer Kimball a polster at

7
00:00:30.800 --> 00:00:35.759
<v Speaker 2>Emerson College, and again I talk at the troiker posters,

8
00:00:35.799 --> 00:00:38.920
<v Speaker 2>posters that I believe in, and Spencer is right there

9
00:00:38.920 --> 00:00:43.799
<v Speaker 2>with Dave Paleologus and John Zogby and what what what's

10
00:00:43.840 --> 00:00:48.439
<v Speaker 2>your What do you got at this point, Spencer that

11
00:00:48.600 --> 00:00:51.920
<v Speaker 2>there's so many numbers here that would make your head spin.

12
00:00:52.079 --> 00:00:54.280
<v Speaker 2>How do you I'm not going to ask you who's

13
00:00:54.280 --> 00:00:57.280
<v Speaker 2>going to win, because obviously if the election, election is

14
00:00:57.320 --> 00:01:00.759
<v Speaker 2>not being held today, But what what's the trend? What

15
00:01:01.119 --> 00:01:03.359
<v Speaker 2>do you see? What do your sense? What do you feel?

16
00:01:03.399 --> 00:01:06.879
<v Speaker 2>Everybody I'm sure has a rooting interest of some sort.

17
00:01:07.480 --> 00:01:10.079
<v Speaker 2>Your rooting interest is to be as accurate as possible.

18
00:01:10.200 --> 00:01:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Correct, You got it, Dan, and thanks again for having

19
00:01:14.120 --> 00:01:19.480
<v Speaker 3>me as always. Well, it's an exciting time two weeks

20
00:01:19.480 --> 00:01:23.040
<v Speaker 3>out from the election, particularly in this race that obviously

21
00:01:23.120 --> 00:01:26.799
<v Speaker 3>got shaken up over the summer, when President Biden drops

22
00:01:26.840 --> 00:01:30.000
<v Speaker 3>out and the vice president jumps in, we saw a

23
00:01:30.079 --> 00:01:34.760
<v Speaker 3>lot of movement in those numbers going in the democrats favor. Now,

24
00:01:34.799 --> 00:01:39.079
<v Speaker 3>it seems over the last four or five weeks they've

25
00:01:39.079 --> 00:01:42.959
<v Speaker 3>been floating back into the Republican's favor, at least at

26
00:01:42.280 --> 00:01:48.359
<v Speaker 3>the presidential level. Some of the congressional races have swung

27
00:01:48.400 --> 00:01:51.400
<v Speaker 3>in different ways, but at the presidential level, it seems

28
00:01:51.920 --> 00:01:55.719
<v Speaker 3>generally across these states they started to trend back towards

29
00:01:55.719 --> 00:01:59.840
<v Speaker 3>Trump after him losing ground when Harris initially jumped in.

30
00:02:00.959 --> 00:02:04.519
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm looking at five point thirty eight, which is

31
00:02:04.719 --> 00:02:09.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of a composite side of the different polls, and

32
00:02:10.360 --> 00:02:16.240
<v Speaker 2>I look at this the favorable unfavorable. This is the

33
00:02:16.280 --> 00:02:20.840
<v Speaker 2>combined polls favorable or unfavorable opinion of Donald Trump. So

34
00:02:21.039 --> 00:02:26.599
<v Speaker 2>on January first this year, his unfavorable is fifty two

35
00:02:26.639 --> 00:02:31.599
<v Speaker 2>point five percent. His favorable was four point two six percent,

36
00:02:31.919 --> 00:02:36.479
<v Speaker 2>just about a nine point nine percent spread. The latest

37
00:02:36.680 --> 00:02:43.759
<v Speaker 2>composite basically has his unfavorable a nine point two percent

38
00:02:43.840 --> 00:02:49.840
<v Speaker 2>spread in the wrong direction. So his unfavorable really hasn't

39
00:02:49.960 --> 00:02:53.240
<v Speaker 2>moved much if we use January first, you know, as

40
00:02:53.240 --> 00:02:56.199
<v Speaker 2>a as a starting point. I'm just picking a number

41
00:02:56.199 --> 00:03:01.759
<v Speaker 2>that you know, he was ten point five unfavorable. Excuse me,

42
00:03:01.840 --> 00:03:04.199
<v Speaker 2>a ten point five difference he was his unfavorable was

43
00:03:04.240 --> 00:03:08.319
<v Speaker 2>fifty two point seven. His favorable was forty two point two.

44
00:03:08.719 --> 00:03:13.439
<v Speaker 2>So again that's a ten point five difference. Now, as

45
00:03:13.479 --> 00:03:18.680
<v Speaker 2>of I guess the nineteenth of October, which would have

46
00:03:18.719 --> 00:03:23.240
<v Speaker 2>been Saturday, his unfavorables nine point two. Not much of

47
00:03:23.280 --> 00:03:31.599
<v Speaker 2>a swing there. And yet if you look at Kamala Harris,

48
00:03:32.120 --> 00:03:37.439
<v Speaker 2>the same sort of set of circumstances, where can I

49
00:03:37.479 --> 00:03:37.840
<v Speaker 2>find her?

50
00:03:37.919 --> 00:03:38.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

51
00:03:38.080 --> 00:03:41.400
<v Speaker 2>I got her here. All of a sudden, she has

52
00:03:41.439 --> 00:03:50.120
<v Speaker 2>had a precipitous drop. Her unfavorable was as high as

53
00:03:51.400 --> 00:03:58.840
<v Speaker 2>sixteen point eight percent in late June, their unfavorable rating

54
00:04:00.439 --> 00:04:05.680
<v Speaker 2>and her favorle rating was only thirty six. Now you

55
00:04:05.759 --> 00:04:11.680
<v Speaker 2>get all the way to today her her unfavorable rating

56
00:04:11.840 --> 00:04:14.319
<v Speaker 2>is forty seven point two and her favorable is forty

57
00:04:14.319 --> 00:04:18.000
<v Speaker 2>six point five, almost the same. So that on that

58
00:04:18.279 --> 00:04:22.319
<v Speaker 2>it would look as if Harris should win because her

59
00:04:22.399 --> 00:04:26.000
<v Speaker 2>favorable unfavorable is pretty closest, so kind of a forty

60
00:04:26.040 --> 00:04:29.240
<v Speaker 2>seven to forty seven split, where Trump still has a

61
00:04:29.360 --> 00:04:32.120
<v Speaker 2>ninety's nine points to the negative.

62
00:04:33.680 --> 00:04:35.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, there's a lot of unpacked there, Dan.

63
00:04:35.839 --> 00:04:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, So go ahead.

64
00:04:39.199 --> 00:04:42.959
<v Speaker 3>We got to remember eight years ago, when Donald Trump's running,

65
00:04:43.000 --> 00:04:47.040
<v Speaker 3>his favorability is at forty percent. So over the course

66
00:04:47.120 --> 00:04:50.800
<v Speaker 3>of the last eight years, essentially his favorability number has

67
00:04:50.839 --> 00:04:54.959
<v Speaker 3>gone up one point every year. And it's almost says

68
00:04:55.000 --> 00:04:59.040
<v Speaker 3>if America has grown more accustomed to Trump and his

69
00:04:59.199 --> 00:05:01.600
<v Speaker 3>number has gone up. So that's a bit of an

70
00:05:01.680 --> 00:05:05.240
<v Speaker 3>issue for the Democrats this cycle, as compared to twenty sixteen,

71
00:05:05.759 --> 00:05:09.079
<v Speaker 3>when you have that messaging where it's more negative on Trump.

72
00:05:09.519 --> 00:05:12.399
<v Speaker 3>Here he's got a more favorable rating than what we've

73
00:05:12.439 --> 00:05:18.319
<v Speaker 3>seen anytime in his political career over these last eight years.

74
00:05:18.519 --> 00:05:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, he's gone up a little bit. Okay, gotcha, I'm

75
00:05:22.560 --> 00:05:24.160
<v Speaker 2>looking at that. You're absolutely right.

76
00:05:24.480 --> 00:05:27.240
<v Speaker 3>So now we got Harris. Harris was the vice president,

77
00:05:27.519 --> 00:05:30.600
<v Speaker 3>and there's a lot of disparaging words that people have

78
00:05:30.759 --> 00:05:33.480
<v Speaker 3>used over the years for the job of the vice president,

79
00:05:33.800 --> 00:05:38.560
<v Speaker 3>starting back with John Adams. You know, even Adams you know,

80
00:05:38.639 --> 00:05:40.720
<v Speaker 3>said it was, you know, not the best job in

81
00:05:40.759 --> 00:05:45.120
<v Speaker 3>the world anyways. So as vice president, usually you're taking

82
00:05:45.240 --> 00:05:47.519
<v Speaker 3>like the heat for anything that's not working out in

83
00:05:47.560 --> 00:05:52.600
<v Speaker 3>the administration. You're usually the attack person on the you know,

84
00:05:52.639 --> 00:05:56.240
<v Speaker 3>with the media, and it hurts your popularity, and so

85
00:05:56.360 --> 00:05:59.480
<v Speaker 3>you saw that with Harris. Then when Harris enters into

86
00:05:59.480 --> 00:06:04.120
<v Speaker 3>the race becomes the nominee, it all changes literally overnight,

87
00:06:04.199 --> 00:06:06.920
<v Speaker 3>and you see it in those numbers. Now what happens

88
00:06:07.040 --> 00:06:09.399
<v Speaker 3>is it's a big shake up, and it's kind of

89
00:06:09.439 --> 00:06:12.439
<v Speaker 3>like people looked at her for the first time as hey,

90
00:06:12.480 --> 00:06:15.839
<v Speaker 3>could this person be president? And some people are like, yeah,

91
00:06:15.879 --> 00:06:18.519
<v Speaker 3>I like that, and you can see her favorability goes

92
00:06:18.920 --> 00:06:22.920
<v Speaker 3>way up. She was in the low maybe thirty seven,

93
00:06:23.040 --> 00:06:23.800
<v Speaker 3>thirty eight.

94
00:06:23.800 --> 00:06:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Exactly on July nineteenth, which I think might have been

95
00:06:27.759 --> 00:06:33.959
<v Speaker 2>the weekend that Joe Biden basically said I'm out, her

96
00:06:34.000 --> 00:06:37.199
<v Speaker 2>favorability rating was thirty seven point one percent.

97
00:06:38.000 --> 00:06:41.879
<v Speaker 3>So she springs up there, and it's very similar to

98
00:06:41.920 --> 00:06:45.480
<v Speaker 3>what happened when she announced her candidacy for president five

99
00:06:45.600 --> 00:06:49.959
<v Speaker 3>years ago. Her favorability springs up then as well, but

100
00:06:50.000 --> 00:06:53.079
<v Speaker 3>then over the course of that campaign, which was about

101
00:06:53.879 --> 00:06:58.800
<v Speaker 3>a couple of months, her favorabilities dropped and just never

102
00:06:58.839 --> 00:07:03.040
<v Speaker 3>took off. So now we're in this election cycle and

103
00:07:03.079 --> 00:07:06.600
<v Speaker 3>we've seen a very similar pattern occur, where yes, that

104
00:07:06.639 --> 00:07:09.839
<v Speaker 3>favorability is up, but now, as you mentioned, she's a

105
00:07:09.839 --> 00:07:13.839
<v Speaker 3>little bit underwater. The unfavorables are a little bit higher

106
00:07:13.839 --> 00:07:17.399
<v Speaker 3>than the favorables again right there with you know, within

107
00:07:17.439 --> 00:07:21.279
<v Speaker 3>a point. And so that's a problem because it's supposed

108
00:07:21.319 --> 00:07:23.920
<v Speaker 3>to be she's going to be a more favorable candidate

109
00:07:23.959 --> 00:07:26.839
<v Speaker 3>than Trump. And when we look at these numbers, and

110
00:07:26.879 --> 00:07:28.800
<v Speaker 3>again these are aggregate numbers, they're not the.

111
00:07:28.720 --> 00:07:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Emerson right right, right, right, Yeah. And also it looks

112
00:07:32.120 --> 00:07:35.560
<v Speaker 2>it looks like that, it looks to me like the

113
00:07:35.600 --> 00:07:40.720
<v Speaker 2>public would love to see two different candidates. Obviously that's

114
00:07:40.759 --> 00:07:41.560
<v Speaker 2>not going to change.

115
00:07:41.720 --> 00:07:44.279
<v Speaker 3>No, they're more happy with these candidates than they were

116
00:07:44.680 --> 00:07:47.519
<v Speaker 3>eight years ago, even though Trump is the same candidate.

117
00:07:47.920 --> 00:07:50.600
<v Speaker 3>They're happier with you know, they have a more favorable

118
00:07:50.639 --> 00:07:53.720
<v Speaker 3>opinion of Trump today than they did eight years ago,

119
00:07:54.279 --> 00:07:59.040
<v Speaker 3>even four years ago. And that's a benefit right now

120
00:07:59.079 --> 00:08:01.480
<v Speaker 3>for Trump in his brand.

121
00:08:02.079 --> 00:08:04.560
<v Speaker 2>So so how does you know, you say, okay, four

122
00:08:04.639 --> 00:08:09.199
<v Speaker 2>years ago, this was before the indictments on.

123
00:08:09.120 --> 00:08:12.759
<v Speaker 3>This, I mean, you know, opinions change. You know, we

124
00:08:13.000 --> 00:08:15.560
<v Speaker 3>like some things. You know, times change, and if you

125
00:08:15.560 --> 00:08:18.079
<v Speaker 3>can stay in the public spotlight, what you know, this

126
00:08:18.199 --> 00:08:22.439
<v Speaker 3>is a very unique candidacy and that it's potentially you know,

127
00:08:22.519 --> 00:08:26.560
<v Speaker 3>it's been eight years, it could potentially be four more years,

128
00:08:26.560 --> 00:08:30.639
<v Speaker 3>which is not something that we regularly see. And so

129
00:08:31.519 --> 00:08:35.080
<v Speaker 3>he has grown accustom to a lot of American voters.

130
00:08:35.720 --> 00:08:35.919
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

131
00:08:35.919 --> 00:08:38.320
<v Speaker 3>And there's also the flip side, where you know, there's

132
00:08:38.320 --> 00:08:41.639
<v Speaker 3>a lot of polarization where they dislike Trump. But that

133
00:08:41.720 --> 00:08:44.879
<v Speaker 3>number has dropped a little bit from where it was,

134
00:08:45.519 --> 00:08:48.799
<v Speaker 3>particularly eight years ago, but even four years ago, during

135
00:08:48.799 --> 00:08:51.879
<v Speaker 3>the COVID response, that number was a little bit higher.

136
00:08:52.080 --> 00:08:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Now it's now that number is down as well. And

137
00:08:55.519 --> 00:08:57.480
<v Speaker 3>those are factors playing into this election.

138
00:08:58.039 --> 00:09:01.120
<v Speaker 2>Now, the national polls who would you vote for polls

139
00:09:01.159 --> 00:09:05.440
<v Speaker 2>the average of all these candidates, of these two candidates,

140
00:09:05.840 --> 00:09:09.799
<v Speaker 2>it's now a difference of a little less than two

141
00:09:09.799 --> 00:09:13.440
<v Speaker 2>percentage points. Harris forty eight point two, Trump forty six

142
00:09:13.480 --> 00:09:18.279
<v Speaker 2>point four. That means that there's still about five percent

143
00:09:18.320 --> 00:09:20.440
<v Speaker 2>of the people who either have voted for a third

144
00:09:20.480 --> 00:09:23.559
<v Speaker 2>party candidate or have not made up their mind. How

145
00:09:23.600 --> 00:09:27.039
<v Speaker 2>important is it for Trump to keep it this close?

146
00:09:27.200 --> 00:09:30.559
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he's losing in the popular vote, but the

147
00:09:30.559 --> 00:09:32.919
<v Speaker 2>theory is that he doesn't necessarily have to win the

148
00:09:32.919 --> 00:09:36.519
<v Speaker 2>popular vote in order to win the electoral college. Right.

149
00:09:36.600 --> 00:09:40.399
<v Speaker 3>Based on Trump's game plans from the last two cycles,

150
00:09:40.440 --> 00:09:43.679
<v Speaker 3>when he lost by two and a half points nationally,

151
00:09:44.080 --> 00:09:47.600
<v Speaker 3>he was able to win those swing states by forty

152
00:09:47.679 --> 00:09:51.080
<v Speaker 3>five thousand votes and win the presidency. When he lost

153
00:09:51.080 --> 00:09:55.399
<v Speaker 3>by four and a half points nationally, then Biden was

154
00:09:55.440 --> 00:09:58.679
<v Speaker 3>able to win those swing states by forty five fifty

155
00:09:58.720 --> 00:10:02.600
<v Speaker 3>thousand votes go on to the presidency. And so, as

156
00:10:02.600 --> 00:10:05.039
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned, some of the polls have it right at

157
00:10:05.080 --> 00:10:08.360
<v Speaker 3>three three and a half. We have it a little

158
00:10:08.360 --> 00:10:11.279
<v Speaker 3>bit under two. But there's a little bit of a

159
00:10:11.320 --> 00:10:15.600
<v Speaker 3>difference between this election cycle and others, and that Harris

160
00:10:15.679 --> 00:10:19.279
<v Speaker 3>is really not campaigning in like forty states. She's not

161
00:10:19.360 --> 00:10:22.080
<v Speaker 3>really going to California, she's not really going to New York.

162
00:10:22.200 --> 00:10:25.600
<v Speaker 3>She's not camp because there isn't that normal election cycle

163
00:10:25.639 --> 00:10:29.120
<v Speaker 3>where there's a nominating phase, there's the primaries. None of

164
00:10:29.159 --> 00:10:32.440
<v Speaker 3>that happened, and so the voters don't know her as

165
00:10:32.480 --> 00:10:35.759
<v Speaker 3>well as they would have known a previous candidate from

166
00:10:35.840 --> 00:10:39.799
<v Speaker 3>any election cycle because that campaigning didn't occur. And so

167
00:10:39.879 --> 00:10:42.879
<v Speaker 3>her numbers are down in New York by like five points,

168
00:10:42.919 --> 00:10:45.559
<v Speaker 3>not ten points. Five points, so instead of being up

169
00:10:45.559 --> 00:10:49.960
<v Speaker 3>by twenty three, she's up by eighteen nineteen. California is

170
00:10:50.000 --> 00:10:50.559
<v Speaker 3>the same.

171
00:10:50.399 --> 00:10:54.039
<v Speaker 2>Thing that doesn't help Trump in the sense that a

172
00:10:54.120 --> 00:10:57.000
<v Speaker 2>loss is a loss. You lose New York by ten votes,

173
00:10:57.519 --> 00:11:00.519
<v Speaker 2>you lose the electoral college votes. He's probably written those

174
00:11:00.559 --> 00:11:01.320
<v Speaker 2>off anyway.

175
00:11:01.039 --> 00:11:03.960
<v Speaker 3>He's yeah, But I'm talking about the national vote, and

176
00:11:04.000 --> 00:11:06.720
<v Speaker 3>that at three and a half percent, three percent, some

177
00:11:06.879 --> 00:11:11.200
<v Speaker 3>of that is inflated in that in previous elections, like Clinton,

178
00:11:11.399 --> 00:11:14.440
<v Speaker 3>she ran up her numbers in New York and California

179
00:11:15.519 --> 00:11:17.320
<v Speaker 3>and she was able to win by you know, millions

180
00:11:17.360 --> 00:11:20.519
<v Speaker 3>of votes. I don't see Harris doing it that way,

181
00:11:20.600 --> 00:11:23.720
<v Speaker 3>and so I do see her having a pathway even

182
00:11:23.759 --> 00:11:27.399
<v Speaker 3>at two and a half to three percent, But I

183
00:11:27.399 --> 00:11:29.759
<v Speaker 3>think it would be more difficult for her if Trump

184
00:11:29.840 --> 00:11:32.720
<v Speaker 3>is able to take the lead nationally, for her to

185
00:11:32.759 --> 00:11:35.519
<v Speaker 3>be able to win the electoral college.

186
00:11:35.840 --> 00:11:39.080
<v Speaker 2>So you think it's a tougher task for Harris to

187
00:11:39.200 --> 00:11:44.559
<v Speaker 2>lose the popular vote and somehow get lucky and win

188
00:11:44.639 --> 00:11:47.159
<v Speaker 2>with the electric call. Its an easier task for Trump

189
00:11:47.559 --> 00:11:52.279
<v Speaker 2>because of the big votes in some big states like Illinois,

190
00:11:52.440 --> 00:11:56.639
<v Speaker 2>New York, Massachusetts, and the biggest sop them all California,

191
00:11:56.720 --> 00:11:59.320
<v Speaker 2>and you can throw in Oregon, in Washington and a

192
00:11:59.360 --> 00:12:01.159
<v Speaker 2>few other states that are that are going to be

193
00:12:01.480 --> 00:12:08.120
<v Speaker 2>big Democratic victories no matter what. Sure, yeah, Maryland would

194
00:12:08.120 --> 00:12:12.679
<v Speaker 2>be category where you know, yeah, hey, if you'll stick

195
00:12:12.720 --> 00:12:15.120
<v Speaker 2>with me for one more segment, I'd love to just

196
00:12:15.200 --> 00:12:17.159
<v Speaker 2>pick your brain a little bit here. I know we're

197
00:12:17.200 --> 00:12:20.399
<v Speaker 2>not calling the winner here. And I'd also like to

198
00:12:20.440 --> 00:12:24.519
<v Speaker 2>invite callers if they'd like to ask a question, a

199
00:12:24.679 --> 00:12:28.919
<v Speaker 2>legitimate question. As I keep telling my listeners, listeners think

200
00:12:28.960 --> 00:12:32.120
<v Speaker 2>that polsters are not on the level. Polsters are the

201
00:12:32.120 --> 00:12:35.759
<v Speaker 2>most on the level people in America because they are

202
00:12:36.000 --> 00:12:38.799
<v Speaker 2>on the line. You can tell your friends you think

203
00:12:38.840 --> 00:12:41.000
<v Speaker 2>that Trump's gonna win, or you think Harris is gonna win.

204
00:12:41.279 --> 00:12:43.480
<v Speaker 2>No one's gonna know you were right or wrong except

205
00:12:43.480 --> 00:12:51.000
<v Speaker 2>your friends. If if either Spencer or day Palliologus or

206
00:12:51.080 --> 00:12:57.080
<v Speaker 2>John Zogby hit this precisely, that that makes their reputation.

207
00:12:57.279 --> 00:13:00.679
<v Speaker 2>They want to be precise, They want to be exact.

208
00:13:00.840 --> 00:13:03.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, at least that's that's my fervent belief, and

209
00:13:03.639 --> 00:13:05.320
<v Speaker 2>I think Spencer will back me up on it. We'll

210
00:13:05.320 --> 00:13:07.039
<v Speaker 2>find out on the other side of the break if

211
00:13:07.080 --> 00:13:09.639
<v Speaker 2>you like to join the conversation. The state of the race,

212
00:13:09.679 --> 00:13:11.279
<v Speaker 2>how do you view it? Six one, seven, two, five,

213
00:13:11.360 --> 00:13:14.399
<v Speaker 2>four ten, thirty six one seven, nine, three one ten thirty.

214
00:13:14.879 --> 00:13:15.799
<v Speaker 2>Let's have some fun.

215
00:13:17.960 --> 00:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Now back to Dan ray Line from the Window World

216
00:13:21.080 --> 00:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Light Side Studios on w b Z News Radio.

217
00:13:26.200 --> 00:13:30.519
<v Speaker 2>My guest is Spencer Kimball, Emerson College pollster, one of

218
00:13:30.559 --> 00:13:35.240
<v Speaker 2>the big significant polling organizations in the country. Let me

219
00:13:35.320 --> 00:13:37.320
<v Speaker 2>run through a couple of states here with you, just

220
00:13:37.320 --> 00:13:40.080
<v Speaker 2>for the fun of it, and I guess I'm looking

221
00:13:40.200 --> 00:13:44.559
<v Speaker 2>at five thirty eight, which again is a composite judgment.

222
00:13:44.879 --> 00:13:50.360
<v Speaker 2>So they're saying right now, Nevada very close, one point

223
00:13:50.399 --> 00:13:55.240
<v Speaker 2>one percent for the Democrats, Pennsylvania point three percent, point

224
00:13:55.279 --> 00:13:57.120
<v Speaker 2>three of one percent, and it was a third of

225
00:13:57.159 --> 00:14:04.320
<v Speaker 2>one percent for Trump. Michigan Democrats by point oh four percent,

226
00:14:04.799 --> 00:14:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Wisconsin Democrat by by half of one percent, North Carolina

227
00:14:12.080 --> 00:14:15.559
<v Speaker 2>Trump by one point one, Georgia Trump by one point six,

228
00:14:16.000 --> 00:14:20.919
<v Speaker 2>Arizona Trump by one point nine. Those all sound pretty

229
00:14:20.960 --> 00:14:23.279
<v Speaker 2>right to you as of this moment in time.

230
00:14:24.720 --> 00:14:28.679
<v Speaker 3>Uh yeah, yeah, I mean in the aggregate, those are

231
00:14:29.080 --> 00:14:30.519
<v Speaker 3>the numbers that we're saying.

232
00:14:30.960 --> 00:14:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, is there is there a state out there? Give me,

233
00:14:35.320 --> 00:14:38.080
<v Speaker 2>give me two or three states that you think could

234
00:14:38.159 --> 00:14:42.919
<v Speaker 2>surprise everyone knows. Massachusetts will be won by Kamala Harris.

235
00:14:43.080 --> 00:14:45.600
<v Speaker 2>We can call that right now California and New York

236
00:14:46.039 --> 00:14:50.840
<v Speaker 2>trumpel Trump will win Florida, assumed trumpel win Texas. There's

237
00:14:50.879 --> 00:14:53.159
<v Speaker 2>any state out there that you're looking at and saying, hmm,

238
00:14:53.320 --> 00:14:56.960
<v Speaker 2>something's going on here this state. I'm looking at it,

239
00:14:57.039 --> 00:14:59.559
<v Speaker 2>and I'm thinking that it might actually be a surprise

240
00:14:59.799 --> 00:15:02.320
<v Speaker 2>on election nights.

241
00:15:03.399 --> 00:15:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, obviously, we have the seven swing states, as you mentioned,

242
00:15:07.240 --> 00:15:10.799
<v Speaker 3>you have your Florida and Texas. That is kind of

243
00:15:10.799 --> 00:15:13.240
<v Speaker 3>off the board. We see those as you know, a

244
00:15:13.240 --> 00:15:16.960
<v Speaker 3>plus five or greater for the Republicans. You got the

245
00:15:17.039 --> 00:15:23.240
<v Speaker 3>three additional states of Minnesota, Virginia, in New Hampshire, but

246
00:15:23.360 --> 00:15:27.480
<v Speaker 3>those states have generally been you know, five points plus

247
00:15:27.519 --> 00:15:33.559
<v Speaker 3>for the Democrats. Though Trump made New Hampshire really close

248
00:15:33.600 --> 00:15:36.320
<v Speaker 3>in twenty sixteen, it bounced back towards the Dems in

249
00:15:36.360 --> 00:15:39.840
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty, and we haven't seen that that bounced back

250
00:15:39.919 --> 00:15:44.399
<v Speaker 3>yet for Trump in twenty four But then you got

251
00:15:44.440 --> 00:15:47.279
<v Speaker 3>like maybe a state like New Mexico we were looking at,

252
00:15:48.000 --> 00:15:50.799
<v Speaker 3>but that one still seems to be pretty strong being

253
00:15:50.799 --> 00:15:54.519
<v Speaker 3>a border state. You know, with Arizona. We saw how

254
00:15:54.600 --> 00:15:57.799
<v Speaker 3>Arizona is a little bit different on their issues, but

255
00:15:57.840 --> 00:16:03.480
<v Speaker 3>not in New Mexico. That one seems pretty solid for

256
00:16:03.679 --> 00:16:06.480
<v Speaker 3>the Dems. And so you know, you've got the first,

257
00:16:06.559 --> 00:16:09.759
<v Speaker 3>the third, the second district of Nebraska. You got the

258
00:16:10.279 --> 00:16:14.320
<v Speaker 3>second district up in Maine. But those two also seem

259
00:16:15.440 --> 00:16:18.080
<v Speaker 3>at least the second district in Maine seem more locked in.

260
00:16:18.960 --> 00:16:23.679
<v Speaker 3>If you watch the debates, it seems that that district

261
00:16:23.720 --> 00:16:26.039
<v Speaker 3>is strong for the Republicans. We'll see if the Dems

262
00:16:26.080 --> 00:16:30.039
<v Speaker 3>are able to hold that first, the second district of Nebraska.

263
00:16:30.159 --> 00:16:33.440
<v Speaker 3>But unfortunately, I don't have, you know, like a magic

264
00:16:33.840 --> 00:16:35.840
<v Speaker 3>state that I say, yeah, no problem.

265
00:16:36.559 --> 00:16:38.600
<v Speaker 2>If you said, hey, here's one to watch, it's a

266
00:16:38.639 --> 00:16:43.799
<v Speaker 2>long shot. But it's again. I guess the thing that

267
00:16:43.879 --> 00:16:48.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at here is I'm looking at Pennsylvania, and

268
00:16:48.440 --> 00:16:53.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking to myself, if Pennsylvania is the state that

269
00:16:53.240 --> 00:17:00.320
<v Speaker 2>decides the election, and if Kamala Harris in retrospe do

270
00:17:00.399 --> 00:17:05.200
<v Speaker 2>you think she is thinking that maybe the governor of

271
00:17:05.240 --> 00:17:08.079
<v Speaker 2>Pennsylvania today might have been a better pick than the

272
00:17:08.079 --> 00:17:11.440
<v Speaker 2>governor of Minnesota, both in terms of how they each

273
00:17:11.440 --> 00:17:16.559
<v Speaker 2>would have played and which state is probably would have

274
00:17:16.599 --> 00:17:20.200
<v Speaker 2>gone democratic anyway, if you know what I'm saying, I.

275
00:17:20.160 --> 00:17:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Do, Dan, and I think you raised two interesting points here.

276
00:17:24.319 --> 00:17:28.759
<v Speaker 3>One is the logistics of a nineteen point electoral vote

277
00:17:28.839 --> 00:17:34.119
<v Speaker 3>state in Pennsylvania, that Governor Shapiro is very popular and

278
00:17:34.480 --> 00:17:37.880
<v Speaker 3>he wins that race. Now he runs against a weaker

279
00:17:38.079 --> 00:17:42.119
<v Speaker 3>Republican candidate and wins by fifteen points, but he still

280
00:17:42.160 --> 00:17:45.160
<v Speaker 3>wins by fifteen points. He's still very popular in the state,

281
00:17:45.559 --> 00:17:47.839
<v Speaker 3>and to your point, he may have been a pretty

282
00:17:47.839 --> 00:17:50.960
<v Speaker 3>strong asset on the ticket. But then I think the

283
00:17:51.000 --> 00:17:54.319
<v Speaker 3>other part is not just the logistics of the state

284
00:17:54.359 --> 00:17:57.839
<v Speaker 3>and the nineteen electoral votes, but that vice presidential debate

285
00:17:58.599 --> 00:18:02.880
<v Speaker 3>seemed to be a momentum stopper and shifter in this race.

286
00:18:03.000 --> 00:18:07.400
<v Speaker 3>And it wasn't a major change, but Harris had performed

287
00:18:07.440 --> 00:18:10.279
<v Speaker 3>well in that first presidential debate or in the only

288
00:18:10.400 --> 00:18:15.160
<v Speaker 3>presidential debate, and even though the polls were still floating

289
00:18:15.200 --> 00:18:17.759
<v Speaker 3>a little bit towards Trump, what we've seen in the

290
00:18:17.839 --> 00:18:20.839
<v Speaker 3>last two to three weeks since the vice presidential debate

291
00:18:22.880 --> 00:18:25.519
<v Speaker 3>was Trump picking up a little bit more ground than that,

292
00:18:26.039 --> 00:18:30.400
<v Speaker 3>suggesting that perhaps Shapiro's would have been a different type

293
00:18:30.400 --> 00:18:36.759
<v Speaker 3>of debater against Vance, and maybe would have presented it

294
00:18:36.920 --> 00:18:41.759
<v Speaker 3>a little bit differently than the way Walls came out

295
00:18:41.839 --> 00:18:45.480
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more folksy. Remember you know, we're talking

296
00:18:45.480 --> 00:18:49.960
<v Speaker 3>about an attorney general versus a governor. Well, Shapiro's a

297
00:18:49.960 --> 00:18:54.079
<v Speaker 3>governor now too, but at the time, so it's interesting

298
00:18:54.119 --> 00:18:58.119
<v Speaker 3>to think about those scenarios. But of course, you know,

299
00:18:58.200 --> 00:19:02.599
<v Speaker 3>at the start walls a lot of positive media, there

300
00:19:02.640 --> 00:19:05.000
<v Speaker 3>was a lot of energy there, and so it's hard

301
00:19:05.039 --> 00:19:08.599
<v Speaker 3>to say how that would have come out if Shapiro's

302
00:19:08.640 --> 00:19:12.079
<v Speaker 3>the nominee, does the progressive wing of the Democratic Party

303
00:19:12.880 --> 00:19:16.400
<v Speaker 3>crater at that moment and say we're out and that

304
00:19:16.440 --> 00:19:18.599
<v Speaker 3>would have been a problem for Harris as well. So

305
00:19:19.759 --> 00:19:22.160
<v Speaker 3>hard to tell how that would have played. But obviously

306
00:19:22.240 --> 00:19:23.880
<v Speaker 3>we'll find out in a couple of weeks.

307
00:19:24.400 --> 00:19:28.680
<v Speaker 2>I would think, So how about this. We're ten thirty.

308
00:19:28.720 --> 00:19:30.799
<v Speaker 2>I got to take a newscast. I got some callers.

309
00:19:31.759 --> 00:19:35.759
<v Speaker 2>You want to talk to the callers? Sure, of course, Okay,

310
00:19:36.000 --> 00:19:40.200
<v Speaker 2>I know you'd be I never would take an assumption,

311
00:19:40.319 --> 00:19:43.559
<v Speaker 2>make an assumption. So El and Dave, I got you

312
00:19:43.599 --> 00:19:45.599
<v Speaker 2>coming up, and if you want to jump on board

313
00:19:45.599 --> 00:19:50.920
<v Speaker 2>and talk with Spencer Kimball sixty six seven, nine thirty.

314
00:19:51.400 --> 00:19:55.039
<v Speaker 2>The State of the Race the twenty twenty four presidential race.

315
00:19:55.880 --> 00:19:59.599
<v Speaker 2>Two weeks from right now, two weeks from right now,

316
00:20:00.279 --> 00:20:04.400
<v Speaker 2>conceivably I'm not saying we will, but it's conceivable that

317
00:20:04.519 --> 00:20:07.480
<v Speaker 2>if two weeks from right now, Pennsylvania has gone a

318
00:20:07.519 --> 00:20:10.640
<v Speaker 2>little more strongly than maybe and is called for Harris

319
00:20:10.759 --> 00:20:14.680
<v Speaker 2>or Trump, that could be the key that unlocks the

320
00:20:14.720 --> 00:20:17.920
<v Speaker 2>electoral College. So it's not inconceivable that the race could

321
00:20:17.920 --> 00:20:19.519
<v Speaker 2>be over. I don't think it will be at this

322
00:20:19.640 --> 00:20:22.319
<v Speaker 2>point in the evening because I think that there will

323
00:20:22.359 --> 00:20:23.880
<v Speaker 2>be too long to go and it may end up

324
00:20:23.880 --> 00:20:27.640
<v Speaker 2>with Nevada and Arizona being the case the states that decide.

325
00:20:27.839 --> 00:20:31.200
<v Speaker 2>But either way, we are now within two weeks. Uh

326
00:20:31.440 --> 00:20:35.359
<v Speaker 2>within we are within two weeks less, two and a

327
00:20:35.400 --> 00:20:40.160
<v Speaker 2>half hours of the polls in Massachusetts, up a down

328
00:20:40.160 --> 00:20:44.119
<v Speaker 2>the East Coast, clothing that's all where this it's two

329
00:20:44.200 --> 00:20:46.279
<v Speaker 2>weeks bo Just think of it like that, two weeks

330
00:20:46.319 --> 00:20:48.640
<v Speaker 2>is not a long time. Back on Night Side right

331
00:20:48.680 --> 00:20:54.319
<v Speaker 2>after this with Spencer Kimball, Polar Extraordinary from Emerson College.

332
00:20:55.000 --> 00:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Night Side with Dan Ray on Boston's News.

333
00:21:01.279 --> 00:21:04.319
<v Speaker 2>My guest is Spencer Kimball. Spencer, I'm looking at some

334
00:21:05.359 --> 00:21:10.400
<v Speaker 2>recent polls here. Your most recent poll was October fourteenth

335
00:21:10.480 --> 00:21:16.400
<v Speaker 2>to the eighteenth. You had it Harris by one. So

336
00:21:16.640 --> 00:21:18.720
<v Speaker 2>have you been are you back in the field now

337
00:21:20.279 --> 00:21:22.039
<v Speaker 2>or when are you back in the field nationally? That

338
00:21:22.119 --> 00:21:24.359
<v Speaker 2>was a USA Today poll.

339
00:21:24.640 --> 00:21:28.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So our national polls we go in right now

340
00:21:28.480 --> 00:21:31.599
<v Speaker 3>each week, and so we went back in the field tonight.

341
00:21:32.480 --> 00:21:35.599
<v Speaker 3>We'll have results back on Friday, and we'll track the

342
00:21:35.680 --> 00:21:39.000
<v Speaker 3>race this week and next week going into the election.

343
00:21:39.680 --> 00:21:42.119
<v Speaker 2>You got some polls coming up tomorrow on state races.

344
00:21:43.279 --> 00:21:46.480
<v Speaker 3>We do, we do. We've been taking a look, as

345
00:21:46.480 --> 00:21:50.640
<v Speaker 3>we previously mentioned, Florida and Texas. Those are two races

346
00:21:50.680 --> 00:21:53.519
<v Speaker 3>that folks have been talking about. So we took a

347
00:21:53.519 --> 00:21:57.359
<v Speaker 3>look down in Florida. Last time we were there. Rick Scott,

348
00:21:57.400 --> 00:22:01.359
<v Speaker 3>the Senator, had a small lead. It looks like he's

349
00:22:01.400 --> 00:22:06.039
<v Speaker 3>extended that lead now to about four or five points.

350
00:22:06.599 --> 00:22:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Trump likewise had a four or five point lead. Remember

351
00:22:10.240 --> 00:22:13.039
<v Speaker 3>that's a state he wins by about three points. We

352
00:22:13.079 --> 00:22:17.880
<v Speaker 3>have him up about seven or eight when you take

353
00:22:17.920 --> 00:22:20.839
<v Speaker 3>a look at where Remember DeSantis wins this state by

354
00:22:20.920 --> 00:22:25.640
<v Speaker 3>nineteen in the midterms, So Florida will be interesting to watch.

355
00:22:26.880 --> 00:22:29.079
<v Speaker 3>So those two are coming out, and then we've got

356
00:22:29.880 --> 00:22:35.279
<v Speaker 3>South Dakota. I don't know if we've got much There

357
00:22:35.359 --> 00:22:37.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot of ballot initiatives out there. Trump is doing

358
00:22:37.920 --> 00:22:40.960
<v Speaker 3>about what he did before. And then we'll get into

359
00:22:41.000 --> 00:22:45.440
<v Speaker 3>some battleground states. Oh, we got Maryland coming. That's the

360
00:22:45.519 --> 00:22:52.119
<v Speaker 3>Larry Hogan race versus alsl Brooks. Hogan was competitive there

361
00:22:52.240 --> 00:22:55.599
<v Speaker 3>last time. We polled in the eight point range, but

362
00:22:55.799 --> 00:22:58.960
<v Speaker 3>now it looks like it's jumped to double digits. Remember

363
00:22:58.960 --> 00:23:01.440
<v Speaker 3>that's a state Massachusetts very much.

364
00:23:01.480 --> 00:23:05.079
<v Speaker 2>It's almost a mirror mirror reflection. I don't think there's

365
00:23:05.119 --> 00:23:08.000
<v Speaker 2>one member of the Congression of Delegation down there who's anything.

366
00:23:08.160 --> 00:23:11.880
<v Speaker 2>They're all Democrats, if I'm not mistaken. What about Texas,

367
00:23:10.920 --> 00:23:14.160
<v Speaker 2>that's a closer race than people would have expected.

368
00:23:15.200 --> 00:23:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, Texas was a state where Trump wins by I

369
00:23:18.000 --> 00:23:20.039
<v Speaker 3>think it was like eight or nine and twenty sixteen,

370
00:23:20.119 --> 00:23:22.039
<v Speaker 3>and then it drops down to about five and a

371
00:23:22.079 --> 00:23:26.079
<v Speaker 3>half in twenty twenty. We have it bouncing back up

372
00:23:26.119 --> 00:23:29.039
<v Speaker 3>for Trump. But the Senate race is very competitive with

373
00:23:29.160 --> 00:23:33.680
<v Speaker 3>Cruise and Colin Alrid. You know, it's a race where

374
00:23:34.640 --> 00:23:38.640
<v Speaker 3>people don't necessarily know the Democrat, but they're voting against Cruise,

375
00:23:38.720 --> 00:23:41.160
<v Speaker 3>and so that's a difficult place for the incumbent to

376
00:23:41.200 --> 00:23:44.640
<v Speaker 3>be in. That one's still very close and we'll be

377
00:23:44.680 --> 00:23:48.079
<v Speaker 3>exciting to watch. But the Senate overall is most likely

378
00:23:48.119 --> 00:23:51.759
<v Speaker 3>going to go towards the Republicans based on West Virginia.

379
00:23:52.200 --> 00:23:54.920
<v Speaker 3>And then later this week we'll have a Montana pole

380
00:23:55.400 --> 00:23:58.279
<v Speaker 3>with John Tester and Chiehi the Republican.

381
00:23:58.920 --> 00:24:01.279
<v Speaker 2>You watch, you'll hot you got to watch Ohio too,

382
00:24:01.319 --> 00:24:02.160
<v Speaker 2>as I understand it.

383
00:24:02.599 --> 00:24:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, Bernie Moreno, the Trump endorsed candidate. He came

384
00:24:09.720 --> 00:24:12.759
<v Speaker 3>out of kind of nowhere to get that nomination based

385
00:24:12.799 --> 00:24:15.960
<v Speaker 3>on Trump's endorsement. And now shared Brown was a very

386
00:24:16.000 --> 00:24:19.960
<v Speaker 3>popular Democrat. You know, we've had him up. But here's

387
00:24:20.000 --> 00:24:22.519
<v Speaker 3>how polling works. When you're the incumbent, you got to

388
00:24:22.559 --> 00:24:25.279
<v Speaker 3>get over at fifty percent, and so when you're sticking

389
00:24:25.319 --> 00:24:28.200
<v Speaker 3>at forty seven eight percent, and that's where Ted cruises

390
00:24:28.240 --> 00:24:31.720
<v Speaker 3>as well, that's that's a sign of concern because that

391
00:24:31.880 --> 00:24:34.880
<v Speaker 3>means voters are still looking around and potentially going to

392
00:24:34.920 --> 00:24:35.880
<v Speaker 3>vote for your opponent.

393
00:24:36.359 --> 00:24:38.319
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's get um, let's get a couple of callers

394
00:24:38.319 --> 00:24:40.680
<v Speaker 2>in here, going to go to L in Saugas. L

395
00:24:40.839 --> 00:24:43.680
<v Speaker 2>hope you have a good question for Spencer Kimball or

396
00:24:43.720 --> 00:24:44.319
<v Speaker 2>an observation.

397
00:24:44.440 --> 00:24:47.200
<v Speaker 4>Go ahead, L all right, Just like there's a thing

398
00:24:47.319 --> 00:24:51.319
<v Speaker 4>called tax avoidance, and then this tax evasion, you have

399
00:24:51.440 --> 00:24:56.839
<v Speaker 4>election influencers, and then you cross the line into election interference.

400
00:24:57.119 --> 00:25:00.799
<v Speaker 4>And I believe the pollsters are guilty of election interference

401
00:25:00.880 --> 00:25:04.119
<v Speaker 4>because the undecideds are the biggest factor. They're the ones

402
00:25:04.119 --> 00:25:05.799
<v Speaker 4>who will move left and right. Like you just said,

403
00:25:05.799 --> 00:25:07.400
<v Speaker 4>you don't know where they're going to go, and you

404
00:25:07.519 --> 00:25:09.960
<v Speaker 4>guys push them to say, I want to pick the winner.

405
00:25:10.039 --> 00:25:12.119
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to Oh, the posters say this one's win,

406
00:25:12.279 --> 00:25:14.319
<v Speaker 4>so I want to say I picked the right one,

407
00:25:14.400 --> 00:25:16.720
<v Speaker 4>and there's nothing to a policy. It becomes like a

408
00:25:16.759 --> 00:25:20.079
<v Speaker 4>gambling horse race or people are an ego trip. So

409
00:25:20.119 --> 00:25:22.240
<v Speaker 4>the only people that should have this information of the

410
00:25:22.240 --> 00:25:25.079
<v Speaker 4>inner circle candidates so they can decide how much to

411
00:25:25.759 --> 00:25:28.640
<v Speaker 4>how much energy to exert our money in different places.

412
00:25:28.799 --> 00:25:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Otherwise, Okay, so you know what, I just want to

413
00:25:32.720 --> 00:25:34.319
<v Speaker 2>make sure I understay what you're saying. Now, what I

414
00:25:34.319 --> 00:25:38.759
<v Speaker 2>think you're saying is that the pollsters should take polls

415
00:25:39.200 --> 00:25:44.559
<v Speaker 2>for candidates but not release the results to the public.

416
00:25:45.319 --> 00:25:47.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, maybe in the history after the fact, because all

417
00:25:47.680 --> 00:25:49.039
<v Speaker 4>you're doing is there's.

418
00:25:48.640 --> 00:25:50.599
<v Speaker 2>A problem with that. You want to be right, Well,

419
00:25:50.599 --> 00:25:52.799
<v Speaker 2>here's the problem that good, it's Spencer's going to react to.

420
00:25:52.880 --> 00:25:57.000
<v Speaker 2>But here's the problem from my perspective. If Spencer Campbell

421
00:25:57.000 --> 00:26:00.599
<v Speaker 2>does a poll for candidate X, whether it's anal poll

422
00:26:00.720 --> 00:26:04.119
<v Speaker 2>or it's a poll in a state, and then he

423
00:26:04.400 --> 00:26:08.599
<v Speaker 2>tells candidate x's campaign here's what the numbers are. How

424
00:26:08.640 --> 00:26:10.640
<v Speaker 2>long do you think those numbers are going to stay quiet?

425
00:26:13.240 --> 00:26:15.319
<v Speaker 4>Right? But the point of it is it shouldn't be

426
00:26:15.359 --> 00:26:18.640
<v Speaker 4>pushed to the undecided voters because you're influencing them.

427
00:26:18.799 --> 00:26:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Spencer, your witness, go ahead. Well, Al from sagas Al.

428
00:26:26.079 --> 00:26:28.599
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate the call and the concern, and it's been

429
00:26:28.599 --> 00:26:32.079
<v Speaker 3>something that's happened in polling industry really since its inception.

430
00:26:32.200 --> 00:26:36.000
<v Speaker 3>There was congressional hearings back in the nineteen forties saying

431
00:26:36.039 --> 00:26:41.160
<v Speaker 3>that pollsters were actually suppressing the vote by just doing polls.

432
00:26:41.519 --> 00:26:43.559
<v Speaker 3>It turned out the data was in the other end

433
00:26:43.640 --> 00:26:46.319
<v Speaker 3>that turnout was actually higher. Not to say that the

434
00:26:46.359 --> 00:26:49.759
<v Speaker 3>polls increased turnout, but it's certainly the conclusion that they

435
00:26:49.880 --> 00:26:53.839
<v Speaker 3>decreased or suppressed turnout really didn't play out in those

436
00:26:53.920 --> 00:26:58.480
<v Speaker 3>data sets. However, when you look at these undecided voters,

437
00:26:58.720 --> 00:27:00.759
<v Speaker 3>you know, we put it out there that still four

438
00:27:00.880 --> 00:27:03.559
<v Speaker 3>or five percent and that the race is open. So

439
00:27:03.680 --> 00:27:06.119
<v Speaker 3>to me, it's not really locking somebody in saying, oh,

440
00:27:06.119 --> 00:27:09.000
<v Speaker 3>this one's gonna win. Jump on the bandwagon, because if

441
00:27:09.039 --> 00:27:11.400
<v Speaker 3>you had that, then Hillary Clinton really would have won

442
00:27:11.480 --> 00:27:15.039
<v Speaker 3>in twenty sixteen because ninety something percent of the polls

443
00:27:15.160 --> 00:27:17.839
<v Speaker 3>were skewed in her direction. So if you were a

444
00:27:17.920 --> 00:27:20.000
<v Speaker 3>nondecided voter, you'd say, well, if I want to jump

445
00:27:20.000 --> 00:27:22.200
<v Speaker 3>on the winner, Clinton's going to be the winner. Even

446
00:27:22.200 --> 00:27:25.559
<v Speaker 3>the expectation question was like sixty percent or hire of

447
00:27:25.680 --> 00:27:28.440
<v Speaker 3>voters dot Clinton was going to win that election. So

448
00:27:29.000 --> 00:27:32.279
<v Speaker 3>there's the bandwagon effect and people jumping on. But it

449
00:27:32.319 --> 00:27:37.480
<v Speaker 3>didn't happen, And so I think it and I hear

450
00:27:37.519 --> 00:27:41.279
<v Speaker 3>your point. Polling really is an opportunity to understand your audience.

451
00:27:41.319 --> 00:27:45.359
<v Speaker 3>It's audience analysis and persuasion. So when we hear candidates

452
00:27:45.400 --> 00:27:50.440
<v Speaker 3>talking about certain issues or topics, it's generally pole driven.

453
00:27:50.519 --> 00:27:52.640
<v Speaker 3>I can tell you what the most important issues are,

454
00:27:52.680 --> 00:27:54.960
<v Speaker 3>and then you can't hear the candidates talk about them.

455
00:27:55.279 --> 00:27:58.279
<v Speaker 3>And then we test out their different policies, you're like, oh,

456
00:27:58.279 --> 00:28:02.160
<v Speaker 3>that's really popular, Like you know, the no tax on tips,

457
00:28:02.440 --> 00:28:05.920
<v Speaker 3>that's a really you know, seventy something percent popularity across

458
00:28:06.039 --> 00:28:09.759
<v Speaker 3>all political ideologies. You can see why both Trump and

459
00:28:09.799 --> 00:28:13.400
<v Speaker 3>then Harris jumped on that policy because it was popular

460
00:28:13.440 --> 00:28:16.960
<v Speaker 3>in the polling kind of let the public see and

461
00:28:17.279 --> 00:28:20.920
<v Speaker 3>and why that policy would be, you know, something that

462
00:28:21.000 --> 00:28:24.400
<v Speaker 3>they would advocate for. And so there's a lot of

463
00:28:24.440 --> 00:28:28.000
<v Speaker 3>different uses of surveys and polls. Remember we're a twenty

464
00:28:28.000 --> 00:28:32.519
<v Speaker 3>billion dollar industry. So but this one area for pre

465
00:28:32.599 --> 00:28:36.680
<v Speaker 3>election polling is an area that we study. We look

466
00:28:36.720 --> 00:28:39.359
<v Speaker 3>at what to do with undecided voters. In fact, I've

467
00:28:39.400 --> 00:28:43.000
<v Speaker 3>done multiple studies that I just study these people and

468
00:28:43.039 --> 00:28:44.759
<v Speaker 3>I say, well, what's the best way to study them,

469
00:28:44.759 --> 00:28:47.119
<v Speaker 3>how to ask these questions and how to learn from

470
00:28:47.480 --> 00:28:51.119
<v Speaker 3>from the from these surveys, and so that's what that's

471
00:28:51.160 --> 00:28:54.720
<v Speaker 3>what we use them for. I can hear the concerns though,

472
00:28:54.759 --> 00:28:58.160
<v Speaker 3>Al We're not looking to influence public opinion. We're looking

473
00:28:58.240 --> 00:29:00.799
<v Speaker 3>to represent and be able to meror it back to

474
00:29:00.920 --> 00:29:03.759
<v Speaker 3>folks so they know, you know, because we all think, oh,

475
00:29:03.799 --> 00:29:05.839
<v Speaker 3>this is how I think about this, and then you

476
00:29:05.880 --> 00:29:08.079
<v Speaker 3>see the survey back and oh, I guess I'm in

477
00:29:08.119 --> 00:29:09.640
<v Speaker 3>the minority on that issue.

478
00:29:09.880 --> 00:29:11.920
<v Speaker 2>I think the people that are trying to influence public

479
00:29:11.960 --> 00:29:18.079
<v Speaker 2>opinion are the spin misters from the different candidate. They'll

480
00:29:18.079 --> 00:29:19.960
<v Speaker 2>look at a poll and they'll say, oh, yeah, you

481
00:29:20.000 --> 00:29:22.680
<v Speaker 2>know we're down one percent, but or I know we're

482
00:29:22.759 --> 00:29:24.960
<v Speaker 2>up one percent, but it's even going to be bigger

483
00:29:25.000 --> 00:29:27.920
<v Speaker 2>than that. There's where I think the influence comes into play.

484
00:29:28.279 --> 00:29:31.759
<v Speaker 2>A good question. I hope you appreciated the answer. I'm

485
00:29:31.759 --> 00:29:34.319
<v Speaker 2>not sure it's going to give insu but it's an honest.

486
00:29:35.000 --> 00:29:37.559
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it was very good. The undecided, though, please try

487
00:29:37.599 --> 00:29:39.880
<v Speaker 4>to explain them. How can you not decide by now?

488
00:29:40.079 --> 00:29:41.799
<v Speaker 4>I know people are voting now too. They just said

489
00:29:41.839 --> 00:29:44.440
<v Speaker 4>on the news, fourteen percent of matter choose that's already voted.

490
00:29:44.519 --> 00:29:46.079
<v Speaker 4>I guess so they just said.

491
00:29:46.440 --> 00:29:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, but maybe I've decided. Turned out to be the

492
00:29:49.200 --> 00:29:50.559
<v Speaker 2>people who choose not to vote.

493
00:29:51.640 --> 00:29:52.839
<v Speaker 4>Ah, very good, Dan.

494
00:29:54.079 --> 00:29:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, if you if you're really undecided, and there

495
00:29:56.759 --> 00:29:59.400
<v Speaker 2>could be some people who decide, I want to go

496
00:29:59.519 --> 00:30:02.880
<v Speaker 2>vote in the Senate race because whatever reason, but I

497
00:30:02.960 --> 00:30:06.680
<v Speaker 2>can't make up my mind, and you know, they blank.

498
00:30:06.920 --> 00:30:08.839
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if they've done a study on how

499
00:30:08.880 --> 00:30:13.480
<v Speaker 2>many people blanked Hillary and Trump in twenty sixteen, how

500
00:30:13.519 --> 00:30:18.000
<v Speaker 2>many blanked Trump and Biden in twenty twenty. Is there

501
00:30:18.039 --> 00:30:19.599
<v Speaker 2>a study done on that.

502
00:30:19.839 --> 00:30:22.720
<v Speaker 3>They usually blank down the ballot, so you're voting for

503
00:30:22.799 --> 00:30:25.000
<v Speaker 3>person and then you blank. Now, the issue in twenty

504
00:30:25.000 --> 00:30:27.759
<v Speaker 3>sixteen were the third party candidates, and it's still an

505
00:30:27.759 --> 00:30:29.799
<v Speaker 3>issue here in twenty twenty. We're not seeing it here

506
00:30:29.799 --> 00:30:32.559
<v Speaker 3>in Massachusetts because we're not a competitive state. But if

507
00:30:32.599 --> 00:30:36.559
<v Speaker 3>you're down in Georgia, there's a Jill Stein billboard up

508
00:30:36.599 --> 00:30:39.640
<v Speaker 3>in town, and we know Jill Stein from Massachusetts. She's

509
00:30:39.720 --> 00:30:44.400
<v Speaker 3>down there campaigning and the Democrats are very concerned that

510
00:30:44.440 --> 00:30:48.359
<v Speaker 3>she's going to pull votes from Harris. Now there's also

511
00:30:48.400 --> 00:30:52.519
<v Speaker 3>a libertarian, Chase Oliver. He's from Georgia and he's down there,

512
00:30:52.759 --> 00:30:55.039
<v Speaker 3>and the Republicans aren't concerned that he's going to pull

513
00:30:55.160 --> 00:30:57.599
<v Speaker 3>votes from So there's a lot of moving parts in

514
00:30:57.640 --> 00:30:59.960
<v Speaker 3>these elections. It's not as easy as just saying, you know,

515
00:31:00.519 --> 00:31:03.559
<v Speaker 3>they'll not vote, or they'll they'll vote on one issue

516
00:31:03.640 --> 00:31:06.400
<v Speaker 3>or another. But it is interesting to see how people

517
00:31:06.440 --> 00:31:08.920
<v Speaker 3>decide where to place those votes.

518
00:31:09.400 --> 00:31:11.880
<v Speaker 2>One thing that you said, one one thing, Yeah, sure,

519
00:31:11.880 --> 00:31:13.400
<v Speaker 2>hold on, just one thing. I want to I just

520
00:31:13.440 --> 00:31:15.480
<v Speaker 2>want to add elephants, Okay, because I'll lose the thought.

521
00:31:15.720 --> 00:31:17.799
<v Speaker 2>One thing that you said, Spencer, which was interesting. I

522
00:31:17.839 --> 00:31:21.559
<v Speaker 2>did not realize that Trump's vote in Texas dropped off

523
00:31:21.559 --> 00:31:25.319
<v Speaker 2>on a percentage basis from twenty sixteen to twenty twenty.

524
00:31:25.720 --> 00:31:28.839
<v Speaker 2>That's the first time I've heard that. I'm sure it's true.

525
00:31:30.039 --> 00:31:32.759
<v Speaker 2>Did anyone someone must have done a study and said, okay,

526
00:31:33.599 --> 00:31:36.079
<v Speaker 2>to prove that the results of the election were with

527
00:31:36.400 --> 00:31:39.240
<v Speaker 2>what people most people accepted that Biden won the race.

528
00:31:41.480 --> 00:31:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Did anyone you know, point out in a public forum that, hey,

529
00:31:45.960 --> 00:31:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Trump's percentage of victory even in states that he won,

530
00:31:50.079 --> 00:31:52.359
<v Speaker 2>was less in twenty twenty than twenty sixteen.

531
00:31:54.519 --> 00:31:57.400
<v Speaker 3>That I don't know. But in twenty twenty, you got

532
00:31:57.440 --> 00:32:00.480
<v Speaker 3>to remember, there were more votes prior to election day

533
00:32:01.519 --> 00:32:04.039
<v Speaker 3>because of early voting, than all of the votes of

534
00:32:04.079 --> 00:32:07.279
<v Speaker 3>twenty sixteen. So we had this huge turnout. And as

535
00:32:07.279 --> 00:32:10.240
<v Speaker 3>we come into twenty twenty four, I'm going to bet

536
00:32:10.279 --> 00:32:12.720
<v Speaker 3>on a lower turnout than in twenty twenty. So I

537
00:32:12.960 --> 00:32:14.799
<v Speaker 3>don't think we're going to have one hundred and sixty

538
00:32:14.799 --> 00:32:17.400
<v Speaker 3>million votes one hundred and fifty five million votes. So

539
00:32:17.440 --> 00:32:19.160
<v Speaker 3>who are the people who aren't going to come out?

540
00:32:19.160 --> 00:32:21.759
<v Speaker 3>And as you mentioned, those might be the undecided voters

541
00:32:21.799 --> 00:32:26.519
<v Speaker 3>five percent, but it could be a more substantial number.

542
00:32:26.759 --> 00:32:30.519
<v Speaker 3>And that's where the pollsters we run into some problems

543
00:32:30.559 --> 00:32:33.880
<v Speaker 3>when we're trying to project turnout numbers and those numbers

544
00:32:33.960 --> 00:32:35.880
<v Speaker 3>don't hit the mark sometimes.

545
00:32:36.039 --> 00:32:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, ell, if you can make it quick or I

546
00:32:38.160 --> 00:32:39.559
<v Speaker 2>can hold you over past.

547
00:32:39.279 --> 00:32:41.960
<v Speaker 4>It real quick. When you've got to do trying to

548
00:32:41.960 --> 00:32:44.640
<v Speaker 4>figure out New Hampshire, you better pull Massachusetts because the

549
00:32:44.680 --> 00:32:47.599
<v Speaker 4>same day registration in Hampshire and they bust people up there.

550
00:32:50.759 --> 00:32:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't believe that, but you could say that.

551
00:32:55.799 --> 00:32:59.079
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they. I really don't. I've never seen

552
00:32:59.119 --> 00:33:01.559
<v Speaker 2>any evidence of that. Do they maybe bust people up

553
00:33:01.759 --> 00:33:06.480
<v Speaker 2>to staff polling places, but I think I've never seen

554
00:33:06.599 --> 00:33:11.200
<v Speaker 2>any You heard some stuff, but you heard this is

555
00:33:11.200 --> 00:33:13.559
<v Speaker 2>what the problem is. I mean, the problem is you

556
00:33:13.640 --> 00:33:15.920
<v Speaker 2>heard some stuff and you say it on my show.

557
00:33:16.319 --> 00:33:19.240
<v Speaker 2>I've never seen any proof of that whatsoever.

558
00:33:20.000 --> 00:33:23.000
<v Speaker 4>Kind of like same day registration either, Well, that's fine,

559
00:33:23.640 --> 00:33:26.279
<v Speaker 4>just like I don't think college students should vote.

560
00:33:26.359 --> 00:33:28.599
<v Speaker 2>I think college students should. We have to vote in

561
00:33:28.640 --> 00:33:32.160
<v Speaker 2>the communities where they live, not in schools that they

562
00:33:32.200 --> 00:33:34.920
<v Speaker 2>happen because they can influence, particularly in the state. But

563
00:33:35.559 --> 00:33:38.559
<v Speaker 2>that's reasonable. But the idea of their buses of people

564
00:33:38.599 --> 00:33:43.039
<v Speaker 2>coming up across the borders from Massachusetts, Massachusetts residents who

565
00:33:43.039 --> 00:33:45.279
<v Speaker 2>have done their duty to voted. The implication of what

566
00:33:45.319 --> 00:33:47.519
<v Speaker 2>you're saying is people vote at eight o'clock in the morning,

567
00:33:47.519 --> 00:33:49.799
<v Speaker 2>get on buses and go up and vote in New Hampshire.

568
00:33:49.839 --> 00:33:52.799
<v Speaker 2>That's just there's no proof of that. Gotta run, but

569
00:33:53.160 --> 00:33:57.240
<v Speaker 2>I gotta run. Thank you all. I have a great one.

570
00:33:57.319 --> 00:33:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Hissbray coming right back with Spencer Kimball.

571
00:34:01.240 --> 00:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Now back to Dan Ray live from the Window World

572
00:34:04.519 --> 00:34:07.680
<v Speaker 1>night Side Studios on WBZ News Radio.

573
00:34:08.519 --> 00:34:12.599
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm gonna keep Spencer with me until eleven, and

574
00:34:12.639 --> 00:34:15.000
<v Speaker 2>those of you who are not gonna get on this hour,

575
00:34:15.320 --> 00:34:16.840
<v Speaker 2>you stay right there and I get you right on

576
00:34:16.880 --> 00:34:18.039
<v Speaker 2>the other side of the break. Let me go to

577
00:34:18.119 --> 00:34:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Dave and Danvers. Dave, you've been winning the longest Go

578
00:34:20.440 --> 00:34:20.840
<v Speaker 2>right ahead.

579
00:34:23.280 --> 00:34:24.760
<v Speaker 4>Uh, it's talking to me Dan.

580
00:34:25.360 --> 00:34:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Are you Dave from Danvers?

581
00:34:27.880 --> 00:34:29.199
<v Speaker 4>Day from Davers?

582
00:34:30.480 --> 00:34:33.239
<v Speaker 2>Is that you Dave from Danvers? We're wasting time.

583
00:34:33.159 --> 00:34:38.719
<v Speaker 5>Dave, Oh, on the phone, hanging on?

584
00:34:39.079 --> 00:34:41.079
<v Speaker 2>Okay, why don't you hang on a little longer? Okay,

585
00:34:41.119 --> 00:34:43.480
<v Speaker 2>put him on hold? Do you want to waste my time?

586
00:34:43.519 --> 00:34:46.199
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna move on to Donna in Berkeley. Donna next

587
00:34:46.199 --> 00:34:47.280
<v Speaker 2>on Nightsider, right ahead.

588
00:34:48.880 --> 00:34:51.320
<v Speaker 5>I can I'm so sorry, and it's the beginning of

589
00:34:51.320 --> 00:34:53.000
<v Speaker 5>the program because I'm on my way.

590
00:34:52.840 --> 00:34:55.480
<v Speaker 2>To work, but I have problem this to say hi

591
00:34:55.559 --> 00:34:57.760
<v Speaker 2>to Spencer Kimball. He's the Emerson College poster.

592
00:34:58.960 --> 00:35:02.480
<v Speaker 5>Hi Spencer Spence. Then my question is when you're doing

593
00:35:02.519 --> 00:35:06.199
<v Speaker 5>these pollings and I hear these pollings every day, my

594
00:35:06.360 --> 00:35:10.280
<v Speaker 5>question is they didn't ask me. And so then Dan

595
00:35:10.480 --> 00:35:14.920
<v Speaker 5>had a good point was maybe these undecided may not

596
00:35:15.039 --> 00:35:19.519
<v Speaker 5>even vote. So how does one do these pollings when

597
00:35:19.800 --> 00:35:22.559
<v Speaker 5>I haven't been asked or my husband hasn't been asked?

598
00:35:22.920 --> 00:35:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, Yeah, well that's.

599
00:35:24.679 --> 00:35:25.519
<v Speaker 2>A great question.

600
00:35:26.599 --> 00:35:29.079
<v Speaker 3>So we've got, you know, roughly two hundred and fifty

601
00:35:29.079 --> 00:35:31.760
<v Speaker 3>four million adults in the country that we get to

602
00:35:31.840 --> 00:35:35.320
<v Speaker 3>reach out to, and you're not getting many surveys here

603
00:35:35.320 --> 00:35:39.280
<v Speaker 3>in Massachusetts because we don't have money competitive races, though.

604
00:35:39.280 --> 00:35:43.280
<v Speaker 3>We are doing a Massachusetts poll this week, and what

605
00:35:43.320 --> 00:35:46.000
<v Speaker 3>we do is we send out about thirty thousand text

606
00:35:46.039 --> 00:35:49.960
<v Speaker 3>messages to a random list of people from the state,

607
00:35:50.599 --> 00:35:54.159
<v Speaker 3>and if you get a text message from Emerson College Polling,

608
00:35:54.239 --> 00:35:57.000
<v Speaker 3>we ask you to take the survey. We'll also send

609
00:35:57.000 --> 00:36:01.559
<v Speaker 3>out some emails and we'll call you on your landline

610
00:36:01.599 --> 00:36:04.400
<v Speaker 3>if you have a landline. And so we use random

611
00:36:04.519 --> 00:36:09.239
<v Speaker 3>sampling sampling of people and from all of those text

612
00:36:09.320 --> 00:36:13.280
<v Speaker 3>messages and phone calls, we'll get about a thousand people

613
00:36:13.400 --> 00:36:17.920
<v Speaker 3>to complete the survey and then we'll do the study. Now,

614
00:36:17.960 --> 00:36:21.519
<v Speaker 3>your question about those undecided voters, and we had al

615
00:36:21.599 --> 00:36:25.079
<v Speaker 3>from the previous segment ask about them. You know, there's

616
00:36:25.119 --> 00:36:28.760
<v Speaker 3>different ways of handling. We've had researchers in the past

617
00:36:28.800 --> 00:36:31.800
<v Speaker 3>who suggest you just take them out of the survey

618
00:36:32.280 --> 00:36:37.280
<v Speaker 3>and you reweight the results based on no undecided voters.

619
00:36:37.760 --> 00:36:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Other folks think that you should push those undecided voters

620
00:36:41.000 --> 00:36:44.039
<v Speaker 3>and you ask them a follow up question saying if

621
00:36:44.079 --> 00:36:46.840
<v Speaker 3>you had to make a decision, which way would you lean.

622
00:36:47.400 --> 00:36:49.840
<v Speaker 3>And so those are two of the more popular ways

623
00:36:49.880 --> 00:36:53.239
<v Speaker 3>of dealing with the undecided voters, and we actually do

624
00:36:53.400 --> 00:36:57.039
<v Speaker 3>both because we're here to study and learn what is

625
00:36:57.079 --> 00:37:00.599
<v Speaker 3>the best methods available out there, and then after the

626
00:37:00.639 --> 00:37:03.119
<v Speaker 3>elections we go back and we say, oh, this worked

627
00:37:03.119 --> 00:37:06.079
<v Speaker 3>better than that, and then we can add to the

628
00:37:06.159 --> 00:37:08.400
<v Speaker 3>knowledge in the field of survey research.

629
00:37:09.760 --> 00:37:12.199
<v Speaker 5>Very good. So my second question, if you don't mind

630
00:37:12.400 --> 00:37:14.480
<v Speaker 5>with all your polling and then you go back to

631
00:37:14.559 --> 00:37:18.760
<v Speaker 5>re examine it after the election, how correct were you

632
00:37:18.840 --> 00:37:19.639
<v Speaker 5>in your polling?

633
00:37:21.199 --> 00:37:25.119
<v Speaker 3>We were pretty good. I mean our national poll in

634
00:37:25.519 --> 00:37:28.559
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty is probably the best in the country. We

635
00:37:28.559 --> 00:37:30.559
<v Speaker 3>were at I think four point two, and I think

636
00:37:30.599 --> 00:37:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Biden wins by four point four. We got tripped up

637
00:37:33.880 --> 00:37:36.800
<v Speaker 3>in a few of the states where we weren't perfect,

638
00:37:37.039 --> 00:37:40.239
<v Speaker 3>and so those are areas that we look to improve upon.

639
00:37:41.559 --> 00:37:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Same thing. In the midterm elections, we were pretty solid.

640
00:37:44.519 --> 00:37:48.159
<v Speaker 3>Remember we're doing twenty four to twenty five different states,

641
00:37:48.239 --> 00:37:51.599
<v Speaker 3>upwards of fifty three fifty five races, and what we're

642
00:37:51.599 --> 00:37:54.440
<v Speaker 3>looking to do is have the survey just fall within

643
00:37:54.480 --> 00:37:58.800
<v Speaker 3>that margin of error. I know that the public wants

644
00:37:58.840 --> 00:38:00.840
<v Speaker 3>you to have the winner, and trust me, I would

645
00:38:00.880 --> 00:38:04.199
<v Speaker 3>love predictive accuracy, but that's not how surveys work. There

646
00:38:04.360 --> 00:38:07.000
<v Speaker 3>are a range of scores, and so if I tell

647
00:38:07.000 --> 00:38:08.880
<v Speaker 3>you that the race is going to be two points

648
00:38:09.159 --> 00:38:12.000
<v Speaker 3>and the other side wins by two the survey actually

649
00:38:12.599 --> 00:38:14.679
<v Speaker 3>does its job. It's a range. It's not going to

650
00:38:14.719 --> 00:38:16.599
<v Speaker 3>be as precise as we would like it to be.

651
00:38:17.119 --> 00:38:18.840
<v Speaker 3>But if I tell you that somebody is gonna win

652
00:38:18.880 --> 00:38:22.159
<v Speaker 3>by ten points and they lose, then that survey did

653
00:38:22.199 --> 00:38:25.199
<v Speaker 3>not do the job because it fell with outside that range.

654
00:38:25.480 --> 00:38:26.800
<v Speaker 3>And so as we take a look at some of

655
00:38:26.800 --> 00:38:30.400
<v Speaker 3>these races like Florida and Texas, those are falling now

656
00:38:30.559 --> 00:38:33.760
<v Speaker 3>outside the margin of error, suggesting that those are not

657
00:38:33.840 --> 00:38:37.039
<v Speaker 3>going to be all that competitive, though these swing states

658
00:38:37.079 --> 00:38:39.400
<v Speaker 3>still seem that they could go in either direction.

659
00:38:40.519 --> 00:38:43.599
<v Speaker 2>All we got we got to stop it. The good questions, Donnie,

660
00:38:43.599 --> 00:38:46.599
<v Speaker 2>get them all in. Thank thank you much, thank you,

661
00:38:47.079 --> 00:38:49.960
<v Speaker 2>all right, right back at you. Spencer is always really

662
00:38:50.039 --> 00:38:52.559
<v Speaker 2>enjoyed it. Uh. I'm going to just go to open

663
00:38:52.559 --> 00:38:54.960
<v Speaker 2>lines on this issue on the other side of the eleven.

664
00:38:55.280 --> 00:38:57.280
<v Speaker 2>But thanks my friend, and we'd love to have you

665
00:38:57.320 --> 00:38:58.840
<v Speaker 2>back at least one more time as we get a

666
00:38:58.880 --> 00:39:02.320
<v Speaker 2>little closer to that two week mark of November fifth,

667
00:39:02.320 --> 00:39:04.519
<v Speaker 2>which is now just two weeks away. Thank you so much, Spencer.

668
00:39:04.559 --> 00:39:07.119
<v Speaker 3>As always, Thanks Dan, I have a great night, all.

669
00:39:07.079 --> 00:39:10.079
<v Speaker 2>Right, hang in there. He's the best, one of the best, folks.

670
00:39:10.119 --> 00:39:11.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm telling you. We only bring you the best here

671
00:39:11.760 --> 00:39:16.119
<v Speaker 2>on night side, and we will continue with your calls. Uh.

672
00:39:16.159 --> 00:39:19.559
<v Speaker 2>We got a couple of open lines six one, seven, two, five,

673
00:39:19.639 --> 00:39:21.519
<v Speaker 2>four ten thirty or six one seven, nine three one

674
00:39:21.599 --> 00:39:25.840
<v Speaker 2>ten thirty. Dial it up. Are you concerned that your person,

675
00:39:26.519 --> 00:39:29.599
<v Speaker 2>your man or woman in this race is dropping or

676
00:39:29.719 --> 00:39:32.000
<v Speaker 2>not going to make it, or are you dead solid,

677
00:39:32.360 --> 00:39:35.719
<v Speaker 2>perfect that you got a winner. We'll discuss right after

678
00:39:35.719 --> 00:39:36.760
<v Speaker 2>the eleven o'clock News
