WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:03.120
<v Speaker 1>What's up everyone, and welcome to another episode of the

2
00:00:03.160 --> 00:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Epstein Chronicles. In this episode, we're going to get right

3
00:00:06.400 --> 00:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>back to the Bill Gates transcript from his meeting with

4
00:00:09.679 --> 00:00:15.279
<v Speaker 1>Congress mister Bell. Good evening, mister Gates, Wesley Bell, Missouri's

5
00:00:15.320 --> 00:00:18.440
<v Speaker 1>first District. I'm going to introduce what's been labeled as

6
00:00:18.559 --> 00:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>minority Exhibit M, which is a photo of you, mister Epstein,

7
00:00:22.000 --> 00:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Boris Nikolitch, Jess Daley, and Larry Summers. Is that correct, Gates? Yeah? Belle?

8
00:00:29.160 --> 00:00:32.399
<v Speaker 1>And when was this photo taken? Answer by Gates, Yeah,

9
00:00:32.439 --> 00:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>I can give you the date there it is. No

10
00:00:34.600 --> 00:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you just want buy it, mister Moran. No, this is

11
00:00:37.640 --> 00:00:40.719
<v Speaker 1>a different one, Gates. This is a different one, Moran,

12
00:00:41.119 --> 00:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>than the one we just than what you just gets

13
00:00:44.479 --> 00:00:47.039
<v Speaker 1>cut off by Gates. Okay, but it's on the same night.

14
00:00:47.719 --> 00:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's only one night that these five people

15
00:00:49.600 --> 00:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>are in the same location. So if you just tell

16
00:00:51.920 --> 00:00:56.719
<v Speaker 1>me that date question, May second, twenty eleven, Gates, this

17
00:00:56.799 --> 00:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>is a dinner at Epstein's New York residence on May second, eleven. Belle,

18
00:01:02.039 --> 00:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I would like to go piecemeal. So this was May

19
00:01:04.439 --> 00:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>sewid and what year Gates, twenty eleven? Bell twenty eleven,

20
00:01:09.280 --> 00:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>And where was the photo taken? Gates? This was at

21
00:01:12.480 --> 00:01:16.519
<v Speaker 1>Epstein's New York residence, Belle. And this was the first gathering,

22
00:01:16.719 --> 00:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>or a gathering of some sort, Gates. There was a

23
00:01:19.599 --> 00:01:22.519
<v Speaker 1>dinner that all five and only the five people you

24
00:01:22.560 --> 00:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>see here had dinner together. I believe this was after

25
00:01:26.040 --> 00:01:31.159
<v Speaker 1>the dinner, Belle. And what was the purpose of that dinner? Gates. Yeah,

26
00:01:31.200 --> 00:01:33.359
<v Speaker 1>this is the second time that I meet Epstein, and

27
00:01:33.400 --> 00:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm in New York for other things, and we had dinner.

28
00:01:36.799 --> 00:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I would say the discussion was pretty broad ranging, with

29
00:01:39.519 --> 00:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>doctor Summers talking about the economy and a variety of things,

30
00:01:43.159 --> 00:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>jess Daley talking about a few of the economy things

31
00:01:46.079 --> 00:01:48.959
<v Speaker 1>going on. And in all of these meetings I would

32
00:01:49.000 --> 00:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>have brought up the foundation work I was doing, Belle, Okay,

33
00:01:52.879 --> 00:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>But the meeting, the dinner, the purpose of it, what

34
00:01:55.359 --> 00:01:59.319
<v Speaker 1>was the original purpose of the meeting? Gates. You know,

35
00:01:59.439 --> 00:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>this is the same second time I meet Epstein. So

36
00:02:01.920 --> 00:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>this idea of going after donors, that really doesn't It

37
00:02:05.239 --> 00:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>may have been mentioned casually, but it's not until twenty

38
00:02:08.159 --> 00:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>thirteen that there's any real engagement on that. So it

39
00:02:11.039 --> 00:02:13.159
<v Speaker 1>may have come up, you know, I at the time

40
00:02:13.560 --> 00:02:16.159
<v Speaker 1>thought having a chance to listen to doctor Summers and

41
00:02:16.280 --> 00:02:19.479
<v Speaker 1>mister Staley would be educational to me. And I was

42
00:02:19.520 --> 00:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>there for other reasons and this fit into my schedule.

43
00:02:22.199 --> 00:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>So this was the second time that I saw mister Epstein.

44
00:02:25.840 --> 00:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I saw one more time that year where he dropped

45
00:02:28.280 --> 00:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>by my office, and that you know, that's the three

46
00:02:30.840 --> 00:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>meetings in twenty eleven, and then a year goes by,

47
00:02:34.199 --> 00:02:37.199
<v Speaker 1>and in the fall of twenty thirteen there's two meetings

48
00:02:37.560 --> 00:02:40.159
<v Speaker 1>and then you have to get out into twenty thirteen

49
00:02:40.360 --> 00:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>before there's any additional meetings. Bell And just to be clear,

50
00:02:44.360 --> 00:02:48.039
<v Speaker 1>other than the economy or economic discussions, what else was

51
00:02:48.080 --> 00:02:51.879
<v Speaker 1>discussed gates? You know, news of the day, where the

52
00:02:51.919 --> 00:02:56.599
<v Speaker 1>foundation was succeeding, what was challenging for the foundation. Doctor Summers,

53
00:02:56.680 --> 00:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, worked at the World Bank and had been

54
00:02:58.719 --> 00:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>part of a book that was very influential to me

55
00:03:01.719 --> 00:03:05.159
<v Speaker 1>called the World Development a Report in ninety three which

56
00:03:05.199 --> 00:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>went through why children under five die and it broke

57
00:03:08.000 --> 00:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>it down and that piece of work that he was

58
00:03:11.000 --> 00:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the head of the project doing that had a substantial

59
00:03:13.400 --> 00:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>impact on me. And I remember bringing it up to

60
00:03:16.159 --> 00:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>him that he influenced my decision to devote philanthropic resources

61
00:03:20.280 --> 00:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to saving children's lives. Bell, So at the time, did

62
00:03:23.840 --> 00:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you know Jess Stay Gates? No, this is the first

63
00:03:27.360 --> 00:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>time and the last time I ever met Jess Stay.

64
00:03:30.560 --> 00:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I knew of Jess as a very senior JP Morgan officer. Belle,

65
00:03:35.520 --> 00:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>did you know Larry Summers? Gates? I know a lot

66
00:03:38.000 --> 00:03:40.599
<v Speaker 1>about Larry Summers. I'm trying to think if I had

67
00:03:40.599 --> 00:03:43.639
<v Speaker 1>met him in person before the dinner. I never had

68
00:03:43.639 --> 00:03:45.719
<v Speaker 1>a dinner with Larry Summers. I may have met him,

69
00:03:45.960 --> 00:03:49.479
<v Speaker 1>but this was my first extended conversation with them. Belle

70
00:03:50.039 --> 00:03:53.159
<v Speaker 1>and mister Gates. Who else was at this gathering? Mister Gates,

71
00:03:53.199 --> 00:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>doctor Nikolic, and mister Epstein, mister Bell just the people

72
00:03:57.240 --> 00:04:00.599
<v Speaker 1>in the photo? Answer? Yeah, the dinner was with exactly

73
00:04:00.639 --> 00:04:03.919
<v Speaker 1>the five people you see in this photo. Apparently there's

74
00:04:03.960 --> 00:04:07.639
<v Speaker 1>multiple versions of the photo. Belle cuts them off. So

75
00:04:07.759 --> 00:04:11.319
<v Speaker 1>who took the photo? Gates? Good question, it's clearly not

76
00:04:11.360 --> 00:04:15.319
<v Speaker 1>a selfie, mister moron. You don't remember, Gates, I don't remember.

77
00:04:15.840 --> 00:04:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the cook, maybe an assistant, I'm not sure, Belle.

78
00:04:19.759 --> 00:04:22.439
<v Speaker 1>And then the last question, were there any young women

79
00:04:22.480 --> 00:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>present on that occasion? Gates? None? Belle, I yield back.

80
00:04:27.959 --> 00:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Now it's mister submaranium. Thank you again for being here.

81
00:04:31.720 --> 00:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been here the whole time. Today today is

82
00:04:34.279 --> 00:04:36.319
<v Speaker 1>a busy day, so I apologize if any of the

83
00:04:36.399 --> 00:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>questions I ask you have already been asked. But I'll

84
00:04:39.279 --> 00:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>do my best. But I think earlier so you've been mentioning.

85
00:04:42.560 --> 00:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>The purpose of knowing mister Epstein was he would introduce

86
00:04:46.279 --> 00:04:48.759
<v Speaker 1>you to folks who would contribute to the Gates Foundation.

87
00:04:49.120 --> 00:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>And I was just wondering if you could kind of

88
00:04:51.040 --> 00:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>rattle off some people he introduced you to. I think

89
00:04:54.360 --> 00:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I heard Leon Black and Josh Harris and Mord Zuckerman,

90
00:04:57.519 --> 00:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe Tom Pritzker. Is there anyone else in introduced you

91
00:05:00.600 --> 00:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to for the purpose of supporting the Gates Foundation? Gates, Well,

92
00:05:04.639 --> 00:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>two things. First, the contributions of global health would not

93
00:05:08.160 --> 00:05:11.759
<v Speaker 1>have come to the Gates Foundation, Submaranium, I see Gates.

94
00:05:11.920 --> 00:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>They would have gone to things like Global Alliance four

95
00:05:14.399 --> 00:05:17.759
<v Speaker 1>Vaccines or the Global Fund and the other endeavors to

96
00:05:17.800 --> 00:05:21.720
<v Speaker 1>help global health, but not to the Gates Foundation, Submaranium,

97
00:05:21.759 --> 00:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Gates. Secondly, Epstein was pretty vague about specific

98
00:05:25.639 --> 00:05:28.279
<v Speaker 1>names for a long time, and that was frustrating to me,

99
00:05:29.000 --> 00:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and particularly after dinner and fall of twenty thirteen, when

100
00:05:32.600 --> 00:05:35.759
<v Speaker 1>my ex wife Melinda came, she had a very negative

101
00:05:35.759 --> 00:05:38.639
<v Speaker 1>reaction to mister Epstein was saying, look, you know, either

102
00:05:39.399 --> 00:05:41.879
<v Speaker 1>get these donations. You know, maybe you should just cut

103
00:05:41.879 --> 00:05:44.759
<v Speaker 1>it off now showing better judgment than I showed, or

104
00:05:44.879 --> 00:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, make this concrete. And I chose to continue

105
00:05:48.040 --> 00:05:51.759
<v Speaker 1>pursuing it. But then I was very hardcore Jeffrey, Okay,

106
00:05:51.959 --> 00:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>who are these people, Let's meet with them. And there's

107
00:05:55.279 --> 00:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of delay, but eventually the results in September

108
00:05:58.279 --> 00:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen. Is it September twenty fourteen meeting where we're

109
00:06:02.800 --> 00:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>finally meeting for the first time. This is Epstein showing

110
00:06:06.079 --> 00:06:08.879
<v Speaker 1>what he thinks might do this, you know, different from

111
00:06:08.920 --> 00:06:12.399
<v Speaker 1>this broad allusion to lots of Wall Street billionaires, lots

112
00:06:12.399 --> 00:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of Middle East billionaires. You know, he had me meet

113
00:06:15.199 --> 00:06:18.319
<v Speaker 1>with people who, as I said, were friendly, but didn't

114
00:06:18.319 --> 00:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>fit that as they were not in any nearer term

115
00:06:22.040 --> 00:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>going to give substantial resources to global health. Mister Summeranium,

116
00:06:26.680 --> 00:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I apologize. Who are these people? Gates? The people I

117
00:06:30.519 --> 00:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>met that day were Leon Black. I don't know if

118
00:06:32.560 --> 00:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>we were scheduled to see Josh Harris or if he

119
00:06:35.240 --> 00:06:37.839
<v Speaker 1>was just in the office there and that was impromptu,

120
00:06:37.959 --> 00:06:42.040
<v Speaker 1>but we saw him, Mark Zuckerberg, Tom Pritzker, and that's

121
00:06:42.079 --> 00:06:46.079
<v Speaker 1>all Summeranium. Did he ever bring up Les Wexner? Gates

122
00:06:46.079 --> 00:06:50.759
<v Speaker 1>ever bring up summaranium? Less Wexner as someone who would Gates, No,

123
00:06:50.920 --> 00:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that name never came up. Summeranium, Okay, And there was

124
00:06:54.199 --> 00:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>one name one email, and I apologize I don't have

125
00:06:57.040 --> 00:06:59.079
<v Speaker 1>copies of it. I can give it to you, but

126
00:06:59.160 --> 00:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>there's an email on September sixteenth, twenty thirteen, saying did

127
00:07:03.360 --> 00:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Jaye want to meet the follow up with and then

128
00:07:06.079 --> 00:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>redacted and see if her redacted would like to come

129
00:07:08.879 --> 00:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>join Jay's meeting with Brock slash Bill Gates. Gates, I

130
00:07:14.120 --> 00:07:16.959
<v Speaker 1>should take a look at that Sumerannium. Yes, I'll give

131
00:07:16.959 --> 00:07:20.279
<v Speaker 1>you a copy. Gates, I don't remember it. Submaranium. You

132
00:07:20.319 --> 00:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>weren't on the email, I believe, But I guess I

133
00:07:22.399 --> 00:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>want to know who Barack is because Brock seems to

134
00:07:25.160 --> 00:07:27.639
<v Speaker 1>be There are a lot of Brocks. It could be

135
00:07:27.720 --> 00:07:31.319
<v Speaker 1>Elwood Barock, it could be Barack Obama. Mister Gates, yeah,

136
00:07:31.319 --> 00:07:34.839
<v Speaker 1>I never met any Barocks in connection with Epstein. There

137
00:07:34.839 --> 00:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>were no Brocks whose names were mentioned or that I

138
00:07:38.199 --> 00:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>met with Summerannium, okay, thank you. And did he Epstein?

139
00:07:42.240 --> 00:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Never have you sign an NDA at any point or

140
00:07:45.040 --> 00:07:48.279
<v Speaker 1>have anyone sign an NDA? Gates? No, I never signed

141
00:07:48.319 --> 00:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>anything in connection with Epstein Summaranian. And did you have

142
00:07:52.360 --> 00:07:55.319
<v Speaker 1>him sign an NDA or anyone else signed an NDA

143
00:07:55.399 --> 00:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>at any point? Gates not, mister Epstein. I think I

144
00:07:59.040 --> 00:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier that it maybe when somebody comes into the

145
00:08:01.800 --> 00:08:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Gates Ventures employee or the foundation, they do, but I'm

146
00:08:05.319 --> 00:08:10.199
<v Speaker 1>not familiar with what specific practices are Submaranium. And then

147
00:08:10.240 --> 00:08:13.279
<v Speaker 1>did you do any sort of background check on him? Gates?

148
00:08:13.319 --> 00:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>On whom Submaranium on Jeffrey Epstein? Gates, I wish I

149
00:08:18.199 --> 00:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>had done more, but I did enough to know did

150
00:08:21.040 --> 00:08:23.279
<v Speaker 1>do enough to know that he had been criminally convicted

151
00:08:23.319 --> 00:08:25.639
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eight or two thousand and nine

152
00:08:25.800 --> 00:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of a sexually related offense, mister Summaranium. And since the

153
00:08:30.000 --> 00:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>experience with him, do you do more thorough background checks now? Gates? Absolutely, Summeranium, Okay,

154
00:08:36.519 --> 00:08:41.559
<v Speaker 1>thank you, That's all I have. Mister Morphy is now

155
00:08:41.600 --> 00:08:46.440
<v Speaker 1>asking questions. Thank you, mister Gates. I'm Congressman Rajah Krishna

156
00:08:46.519 --> 00:08:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Morthy from Illinois. Did Jeffrey Epstein ever reference foreign intelligence

157
00:08:50.759 --> 00:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>agencies to you? Gates? He did not question. Did you

158
00:08:55.360 --> 00:08:57.639
<v Speaker 1>ever have any evidence or see any evidence that he

159
00:08:57.720 --> 00:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>might have been a foreign asset? Gates? I did not question,

160
00:09:01.399 --> 00:09:03.639
<v Speaker 1>did he ever make any threats to you about revealing

161
00:09:03.679 --> 00:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>any particular piece of information about you or your family

162
00:09:07.519 --> 00:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>or your background? Gates? Well, I viewed the attempt to

163
00:09:11.279 --> 00:09:14.759
<v Speaker 1>have me reimburse him for things he purportedly paid for

164
00:09:14.759 --> 00:09:17.159
<v Speaker 1>for the bridge player. I viewed that as taking a

165
00:09:17.200 --> 00:09:20.799
<v Speaker 1>step beyond the veil comments he made during doctor Nikolitch's exit.

166
00:09:21.440 --> 00:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, at that point, although it's kind of trivial,

167
00:09:23.679 --> 00:09:26.679
<v Speaker 1>some of money I thought that, you know, was moving

168
00:09:26.679 --> 00:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>further down the line of him threatening, although you know

169
00:09:30.360 --> 00:09:33.159
<v Speaker 1>the way he phrased it, is it that this was

170
00:09:33.200 --> 00:09:35.799
<v Speaker 1>just a reimbursement for something I did, even going as

171
00:09:35.840 --> 00:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>far as to pretend that I had somehow encouraged him

172
00:09:38.440 --> 00:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>to do so, which is completely false, mister krishnal Morthy.

173
00:09:42.960 --> 00:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>And how much money was that again, that he asked

174
00:09:45.399 --> 00:09:48.919
<v Speaker 1>you to pay back? Gates? I won't remember the amounts,

175
00:09:48.960 --> 00:09:51.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's you know, thousands of dollars, not tens of

176
00:09:51.440 --> 00:09:55.519
<v Speaker 1>thousands of dollars kryshnal Morty Okay. Besides that, did he

177
00:09:55.600 --> 00:09:58.320
<v Speaker 1>ever ask you for any other money? Gates? No, I

178
00:09:58.360 --> 00:10:00.759
<v Speaker 1>never paid him. I made it clearly he would not

179
00:10:00.799 --> 00:10:04.159
<v Speaker 1>be paid, and I never paid him. Christ No Morty Okay.

180
00:10:04.440 --> 00:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>In your discussions with any other world leaders or any

181
00:10:07.279 --> 00:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>other dignitaries, has anybody else referenced Jeffrey Epstein in the

182
00:10:10.960 --> 00:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>context of him having made threats to them or comments

183
00:10:14.200 --> 00:10:17.759
<v Speaker 1>to the effect that he might be an intelligence asset? Gates.

184
00:10:18.039 --> 00:10:20.679
<v Speaker 1>No mention of Jeffrey Epstein has ever come up in

185
00:10:20.720 --> 00:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>any discussion with the world leaders that I have met.

186
00:10:23.759 --> 00:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Christnal Morty Forbes, I'm sorry. Wall Street Journal reported that

187
00:10:27.120 --> 00:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Warren Buffett stopped giving the Gates Foundation in part because

188
00:10:30.360 --> 00:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>of the Epstein situation, and in March of this year,

189
00:10:33.399 --> 00:10:36.159
<v Speaker 1>he told CNBC that he's going to make his decision

190
00:10:36.240 --> 00:10:39.559
<v Speaker 1>in June of this year, so this month as to

191
00:10:39.600 --> 00:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>whether he's going to give more to the Gates Foundation,

192
00:10:42.120 --> 00:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>based on what else he sees with the Epstein files.

193
00:10:45.840 --> 00:10:48.679
<v Speaker 1>What did he tell you gives him cause for concern

194
00:10:48.759 --> 00:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>with regard to your relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Gates, The

195
00:10:53.080 --> 00:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>last time I talked to Warren directly was in January,

196
00:10:55.679 --> 00:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>where we didn't talk about this. I think it was

197
00:10:58.399 --> 00:11:00.840
<v Speaker 1>prior to the release of the Epstein file. We talked

198
00:11:00.840 --> 00:11:03.919
<v Speaker 1>about my health challenges and some other things. I'm sure

199
00:11:03.960 --> 00:11:05.919
<v Speaker 1>you know he's looking at the press. I don't think

200
00:11:05.960 --> 00:11:08.440
<v Speaker 1>he has any knowledge other than what he's reading in

201
00:11:08.480 --> 00:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the press. Question. In an interview with Emily Kirkpatrick, your

202
00:11:14.000 --> 00:11:16.919
<v Speaker 1>wife Melinda said that when you first met Jeffrey Epstein.

203
00:11:17.000 --> 00:11:19.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, this is an interview with Gail King of

204
00:11:19.879 --> 00:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>CBS this morning. She said, I regretted meeting Jeffrey Epstein

205
00:11:23.360 --> 00:11:26.039
<v Speaker 1>the second I walked in the door. He was abhorrent.

206
00:11:26.279 --> 00:11:29.919
<v Speaker 1>He was evil personified. What does she say to you

207
00:11:30.159 --> 00:11:32.559
<v Speaker 1>about the first meeting that letter to believe that he

208
00:11:32.679 --> 00:11:36.399
<v Speaker 1>was evil personified? Gates, Yeah, so I believe her only

209
00:11:36.440 --> 00:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>meeting with Epstein was the dinner that I had described

210
00:11:39.480 --> 00:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that she came to, and she definitely had a very

211
00:11:42.159 --> 00:11:46.440
<v Speaker 1>negative impression of him. Krishna Morthy why Gates her instinct

212
00:11:46.480 --> 00:11:50.159
<v Speaker 1>about arrogant men or I'm sure what, but she certainly

213
00:11:50.159 --> 00:11:54.279
<v Speaker 1>showed better judgment than I did. Question. We have in

214
00:11:54.320 --> 00:11:56.559
<v Speaker 1>our notes that you met with Jeffrey Epstein ten times,

215
00:11:56.720 --> 00:11:59.399
<v Speaker 1>at least ten times. What's the number that you what

216
00:11:59.519 --> 00:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is the number of times that you believe that you

217
00:12:01.639 --> 00:12:05.279
<v Speaker 1>met with Jeffrey Epstein, mister Gates. You know, I think

218
00:12:05.320 --> 00:12:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it depends on whether you count skype calls or the

219
00:12:07.960 --> 00:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>one time he dropped by my office. You know, there

220
00:12:10.320 --> 00:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>was a dinner, a ted dinner that we both attended,

221
00:12:13.120 --> 00:12:15.919
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't talk to him. You know, I think

222
00:12:15.960 --> 00:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>it's like twelve to fourteen times plus two skype calls

223
00:12:19.519 --> 00:12:23.879
<v Speaker 1>in total over a four year period. Mister Krishna Morty, Okay,

224
00:12:24.080 --> 00:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. All right, folks, we're going to

225
00:12:26.399 --> 00:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>wrap up right here, and in the next episode, we're

226
00:12:28.519 --> 00:12:30.799
<v Speaker 1>going to pick up where we left off. All the

227
00:12:30.840 --> 00:12:33.879
<v Speaker 1>information that goes with this episode can be found in

228
00:12:33.919 --> 00:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the description box. What's up, everyone, and welcome to another

229
00:12:37.120 --> 00:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>episode of the Epstein Chronicles. In this episode, we're going

230
00:12:40.759 --> 00:12:42.759
<v Speaker 1>to pick up where we left off with the Bill

231
00:12:42.799 --> 00:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Gates testimony that he gave to Congress asking the questions

232
00:12:47.960 --> 00:12:50.799
<v Speaker 1>now is miss Randall? Thank you, mister Gates. I'm Emily

233
00:12:50.879 --> 00:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Randall from Washington sixth I appreciate you being here and

234
00:12:54.440 --> 00:12:56.919
<v Speaker 1>answering our questions. And I want to follow up a

235
00:12:56.919 --> 00:12:59.559
<v Speaker 1>little bit on a question that ranking Member Robert Garcia

236
00:13:00.120 --> 00:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to begin with, about who the men were in Epstein's

237
00:13:03.279 --> 00:13:06.440
<v Speaker 1>orbit that you may have seen or engage with at

238
00:13:06.480 --> 00:13:08.919
<v Speaker 1>any of these meetings, and you said, you know that

239
00:13:09.000 --> 00:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you didn't see anyone engaging any illegal or I listed activities,

240
00:13:12.600 --> 00:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and you didn't want to cast dispersions of any of

241
00:13:15.360 --> 00:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>these men, which I understand, but I think some of

242
00:13:18.080 --> 00:13:20.799
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen in our investigative work and in our

243
00:13:20.840 --> 00:13:23.879
<v Speaker 1>conversations and in the files is that, you know, it

244
00:13:23.919 --> 00:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>became very easy for a lot of people to say

245
00:13:26.240 --> 00:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that they didn't see anything, and that's part of how

246
00:13:28.639 --> 00:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>he continued to have such a long history of abuse.

247
00:13:32.279 --> 00:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>And so I just want to ask you if there

248
00:13:34.200 --> 00:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>are any other names or people that you haven't mentioned yet.

249
00:13:37.600 --> 00:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned doctor Nikolch, Larry Summers, Jess Daley, Leon Black,

250
00:13:41.320 --> 00:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Josh Harris, Mark Zuckerberg, Tom Pritzker. Were the other men

251
00:13:45.480 --> 00:13:48.679
<v Speaker 1>that were involved, maybe not necessarily men that he was

252
00:13:48.720 --> 00:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to introduce into the Global Health Network, but folks

253
00:13:52.440 --> 00:13:54.679
<v Speaker 1>in any of these meetings that we should ask follow

254
00:13:54.799 --> 00:13:57.559
<v Speaker 1>up questions on not saying that you're accusing them of

255
00:13:57.600 --> 00:14:00.519
<v Speaker 1>anything but to make sure that we're uncovering every stone

256
00:14:00.759 --> 00:14:04.679
<v Speaker 1>in this work to find transparency and justice Gates. Yeah,

257
00:14:04.759 --> 00:14:07.039
<v Speaker 1>I believe that today I mentioned the name of every

258
00:14:07.039 --> 00:14:10.799
<v Speaker 1>single individual who was in a meeting with myself and Epstein.

259
00:14:11.519 --> 00:14:14.039
<v Speaker 1>And you know, beyond that, you know, all these emails

260
00:14:14.080 --> 00:14:17.039
<v Speaker 1>released in January have other names in there. I don't

261
00:14:17.039 --> 00:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>bring any personal knowledge to that, but you know, I'm

262
00:14:19.600 --> 00:14:21.879
<v Speaker 1>here to help in any way I can. I can't

263
00:14:21.879 --> 00:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>think of anyone whose name I haven't mentioned that I

264
00:14:24.639 --> 00:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>knew had some relationship with Epstein. Miss Randall, thank you.

265
00:14:29.080 --> 00:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Miss Stansbury asked about the woman young

266
00:14:32.039 --> 00:14:35.039
<v Speaker 1>women who worked for mister Epstein, and we've established that

267
00:14:35.080 --> 00:14:37.639
<v Speaker 1>some of these women who were employed by him were

268
00:14:37.679 --> 00:14:41.039
<v Speaker 1>also being trafficked and abused whether you know, though he

269
00:14:41.080 --> 00:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>may not have been your knowledge at the time, I understand,

270
00:14:44.720 --> 00:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I do want to ask because of my conversation with

271
00:14:47.159 --> 00:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>some survivors who were under age when they were pulled

272
00:14:49.840 --> 00:14:53.159
<v Speaker 1>into mister Epstein's world. They have relayed to us that

273
00:14:53.200 --> 00:14:56.039
<v Speaker 1>no one ever mister Epstein knew how old they were.

274
00:14:56.279 --> 00:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>But you know, no one in the room at parties,

275
00:14:58.600 --> 00:15:01.279
<v Speaker 1>at events, at meetings ever asked how old they were.

276
00:15:01.840 --> 00:15:04.879
<v Speaker 1>They assumed they were adults because they looked like adults.

277
00:15:05.279 --> 00:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>A seventeen year old young woman, you know, is not

278
00:15:07.480 --> 00:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>always spottable as a seventeen year old young woman. Just

279
00:15:11.320 --> 00:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking about any woman who were at any of these meetings,

280
00:15:14.279 --> 00:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>who were working at mister Epstein's home, who were engaged

281
00:15:17.480 --> 00:15:20.879
<v Speaker 1>in any coordination, can you think of, you know, any

282
00:15:20.919 --> 00:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>young woman who we should talk to, mister Gates. No,

283
00:15:24.720 --> 00:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>The only thing I did with Epstein that was of

284
00:15:27.039 --> 00:15:30.519
<v Speaker 1>casual entertainment nature was when he had David Blaine come

285
00:15:30.559 --> 00:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>over after we had a dinner meeting. And as I've said,

286
00:15:34.120 --> 00:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>as you've seen in the photographs, there were two of

287
00:15:36.399 --> 00:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the women around Epstein who were standing around during the

288
00:15:39.519 --> 00:15:43.399
<v Speaker 1>David Blaine performance. But you know, you've heard from everything

289
00:15:43.440 --> 00:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I know about the women around Epstein, and I'm sorry

290
00:15:46.440 --> 00:15:49.799
<v Speaker 1>to hear that some of them were victims. Randall, thank

291
00:15:49.840 --> 00:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you so much for your answers and joining us, mister Gates.

292
00:15:54.279 --> 00:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Next question by redacted question, mister Gates, did you ever

293
00:15:58.279 --> 00:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>meet Gallaine Maxwell? Answer her? One time I was at

294
00:16:01.480 --> 00:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a hotel restaurant and she and Ted Waite were there,

295
00:16:04.440 --> 00:16:06.399
<v Speaker 1>and that was the one time I was introduced to her.

296
00:16:07.039 --> 00:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Question one was that answer? It's a good question. She

297
00:16:10.159 --> 00:16:13.799
<v Speaker 1>clearly had left time with Epstein and was with Ted Waite.

298
00:16:14.039 --> 00:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Ted Waite is someone I knew fairly well because he

299
00:16:16.480 --> 00:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>created a company called Gateway that was in personal computer business.

300
00:16:20.279 --> 00:16:22.279
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it was just a few minutes introduction

301
00:16:22.600 --> 00:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>because we happened to be in the same place. But

302
00:16:24.919 --> 00:16:31.559
<v Speaker 1>other than that, I never met her. Question and that

303
00:16:31.720 --> 00:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>was simply an introduction rather than a substantative conversation. Answer,

304
00:16:35.879 --> 00:16:39.879
<v Speaker 1>not a substantative conversation. No question. And was this during

305
00:16:39.879 --> 00:16:44.759
<v Speaker 1>the period of your relationship with Jeffrey Epstein or after? Answer? No,

306
00:16:44.879 --> 00:16:46.639
<v Speaker 1>I think it was after, but we would have to

307
00:16:46.679 --> 00:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>dig out the date. Question. And did miss Maxwell ever

308
00:16:50.240 --> 00:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>come up in conversations with Jeffrey Epstein? Answer never question?

309
00:16:55.720 --> 00:16:58.559
<v Speaker 1>Did she ever come up in conversations with Melanie Walker?

310
00:16:58.919 --> 00:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Answer never? Question? Okay, mister Gates. A few minutes ago,

311
00:17:03.919 --> 00:17:07.400
<v Speaker 1>in a response to mister Krishnil Morty's questions, you mentioned

312
00:17:07.400 --> 00:17:11.880
<v Speaker 1>there were two skype calls. Is that right? Answer to question?

313
00:17:12.000 --> 00:17:16.039
<v Speaker 1>Skype calls? Answer right question? And I think we discussed

314
00:17:16.039 --> 00:17:19.599
<v Speaker 1>one earlier, which occurred on February twenty seventh, twenty fourteen.

315
00:17:19.680 --> 00:17:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Is that right? Answer? Well, we inadvertently discussed it. Question sure, answer,

316
00:17:25.480 --> 00:17:28.440
<v Speaker 1>because there was a question about February twenty seventh, twenty

317
00:17:28.519 --> 00:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>thirteen thing, and I accidentally saw February twenty seventh and said, oh,

318
00:17:33.279 --> 00:17:36.839
<v Speaker 1>that meeting was a skype call. The February twenty seventh,

319
00:17:36.880 --> 00:17:40.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirteen meeting is in person meeting in New York.

320
00:17:40.680 --> 00:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>And the February twenty seventh, twenty thirteen meeting is a

321
00:17:44.240 --> 00:17:50.759
<v Speaker 1>skype call? Question understood? And when was the second skype call? Answer?

322
00:17:50.880 --> 00:17:54.279
<v Speaker 1>The second Skype call is May twenty first, twenty fourteen.

323
00:17:55.000 --> 00:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Question and what was the purpose of that call? Answer?

324
00:17:58.240 --> 00:18:01.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, everything in this time is focusing on who

325
00:18:01.359 --> 00:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>are these donors? Is this going to be real? And

326
00:18:04.319 --> 00:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>so right after the second skype call is when he

327
00:18:06.759 --> 00:18:09.359
<v Speaker 1>suggests the names of people that we would end up

328
00:18:09.400 --> 00:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>meeting in September, which is the second to last meeting

329
00:18:12.480 --> 00:18:15.839
<v Speaker 1>I had with Epstein. Question and do you recall the

330
00:18:15.880 --> 00:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>exact discussions of that call with mister Epstein? Answer? I

331
00:18:19.039 --> 00:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>do not. Question was anyone else on that call? Answer?

332
00:18:22.839 --> 00:18:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Larry Cohen may have come for some part of the call.

333
00:18:27.640 --> 00:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>They go off the record, they're back on Gates. Yeah,

334
00:18:30.039 --> 00:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>my note chho Larry as being on the first of

335
00:18:32.480 --> 00:18:35.759
<v Speaker 1>the two Skype calls, but not on the second call. Question,

336
00:18:35.920 --> 00:18:38.519
<v Speaker 1>not on the second one, And I have in my notes,

337
00:18:38.799 --> 00:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>and I could have this incorrect, but I believe you

338
00:18:41.160 --> 00:18:44.319
<v Speaker 1>testified earlier that it was the first Skype call was

339
00:18:44.400 --> 00:18:47.400
<v Speaker 1>just you and mister Epstein. That's not true. Answer. No,

340
00:18:47.799 --> 00:18:50.079
<v Speaker 1>the first Skype call Larry Cohen is part of that.

341
00:18:51.039 --> 00:18:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Question understood? And who was on the second Skype call? Answer?

342
00:18:54.920 --> 00:18:58.039
<v Speaker 1>It looks like just myself in Epstein question, just you

343
00:18:58.119 --> 00:19:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and Epstein? Okay, Why was this inducted over Skype? Answer?

344
00:19:02.200 --> 00:19:05.519
<v Speaker 1>Because we weren't in the same physical location? Question Why

345
00:19:05.559 --> 00:19:09.839
<v Speaker 1>the sky platform answer? Microsoft owned Skype? Question? Did you

346
00:19:09.880 --> 00:19:13.880
<v Speaker 1>suggest Skype? Answer? I mean, I'm capable of using probably Severn,

347
00:19:14.200 --> 00:19:17.559
<v Speaker 1>several different video calling platforms. I don't think there's any

348
00:19:17.640 --> 00:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>unique feature of Skype that caused it to be used.

349
00:19:20.640 --> 00:19:23.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, Subsequently, I've shifted ninety percent of my use

350
00:19:23.759 --> 00:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to teams and perhaps ten percent to Zoom, so this

351
00:19:27.319 --> 00:19:30.079
<v Speaker 1>may have Indeed, the second meeting may have been my

352
00:19:30.240 --> 00:19:34.079
<v Speaker 1>final Skype call. Question understood, And I guess the reason

353
00:19:34.119 --> 00:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that I'm asking is because Jeffrey Epstein does have a

354
00:19:37.039 --> 00:19:40.079
<v Speaker 1>demonstrated history of using Skype, and so my question to

355
00:19:40.119 --> 00:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you is, did he recommend that this meeting be conducted

356
00:19:43.319 --> 00:19:47.839
<v Speaker 1>on Skype? Answer? I don't know. Question Okay, mister adacted,

357
00:19:48.000 --> 00:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>we can go off record. Question, we can go back

358
00:19:51.039 --> 00:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>on record. Mister Gates. We briefly discussed your relationship or

359
00:19:54.960 --> 00:19:58.359
<v Speaker 1>your one interaction that you recall with Glenn Maxwell during

360
00:19:58.359 --> 00:20:01.279
<v Speaker 1>the last hour. Just to be clear, that's the only

361
00:20:01.319 --> 00:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>interaction with her that you recall. Answer, the only time

362
00:20:04.240 --> 00:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I ever met her. Yeah. Question, she did tell the

363
00:20:07.160 --> 00:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice in an interview that she did with

364
00:20:11.359 --> 00:20:13.559
<v Speaker 1>them last summer that she met you. It sounds like

365
00:20:13.599 --> 00:20:16.319
<v Speaker 1>briefly at a TED conference. Do you have any recollection

366
00:20:16.359 --> 00:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of that? Answer? Yeah, there was a TED dinner with

367
00:20:19.000 --> 00:20:21.799
<v Speaker 1>about forty or fifty people, and she was an attendee there.

368
00:20:22.279 --> 00:20:23.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I shook her hand, and I

369
00:20:23.880 --> 00:20:26.559
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a conversation with her. Question, but do you

370
00:20:26.559 --> 00:20:28.880
<v Speaker 1>recall that she was there? In general? Answer? I think

371
00:20:28.920 --> 00:20:32.359
<v Speaker 1>she attended a dinner around the TED conference. Yes. Question,

372
00:20:32.440 --> 00:20:35.319
<v Speaker 1>do you recall any other I'll call them interactions, but

373
00:20:35.440 --> 00:20:37.400
<v Speaker 1>any other times you were in the same place as

374
00:20:37.440 --> 00:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Glenn Maxwell, other than the meeting with Ted Waite, the

375
00:20:41.079 --> 00:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>brief meeting with Ted Waite, and this very brief meeting

376
00:20:44.200 --> 00:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>at a dinner at a Ted conference. Answer, as I

377
00:20:48.000 --> 00:20:50.440
<v Speaker 1>say on the Ted thing, I don't know that I

378
00:20:50.440 --> 00:20:53.039
<v Speaker 1>shook her hand. I'm not sure, but I didn't have

379
00:20:53.079 --> 00:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a conversation with her other than those two times. No,

380
00:20:55.960 --> 00:21:01.119
<v Speaker 1>I never met her. Mister Emer's asking questions. Now, mister Gates,

381
00:21:01.440 --> 00:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>we're at a point in our questioning where, unfortunately I

382
00:21:04.279 --> 00:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>do have to make you repeat yourself just to make

383
00:21:06.160 --> 00:21:09.079
<v Speaker 1>sure that the record is crystal clear. During the first hour,

384
00:21:09.160 --> 00:21:11.319
<v Speaker 1>I believe you had mentioned that at some point you

385
00:21:11.359 --> 00:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>were invited to mister Epstein's island. Is that right answer? Yes,

386
00:21:15.119 --> 00:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>several times he had issued an invitation. Question and approximately

387
00:21:19.720 --> 00:21:23.079
<v Speaker 1>when you extended those invites answer, we can dig through

388
00:21:23.079 --> 00:21:26.559
<v Speaker 1>the emails. I don't know the timing question, and he

389
00:21:26.640 --> 00:21:30.519
<v Speaker 1>himself directly invited you, Is that right answer, that's right question,

390
00:21:30.599 --> 00:21:35.039
<v Speaker 1>and you rejected those invites. Answer, that's correct question? Right?

391
00:21:35.759 --> 00:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And as far as his other properties go, you've testified

392
00:21:38.319 --> 00:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>numerous times to have had dinners at his Manhattan townhouse.

393
00:21:41.559 --> 00:21:45.079
<v Speaker 1>Is that right answer? That's right question? Have you ever

394
00:21:45.200 --> 00:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>visited his Paris apartment? Answer? Yeah, I talked about that

395
00:21:48.559 --> 00:21:51.880
<v Speaker 1>one meeting I had there. Question what about Zoro Ranch

396
00:21:52.119 --> 00:21:55.839
<v Speaker 1>in New Mexico? Answer never went there. Question how about

397
00:21:55.839 --> 00:21:59.759
<v Speaker 1>the Pombeach home? Answer never went there. Question any other

398
00:21:59.759 --> 00:22:04.039
<v Speaker 1>properties owned by mister Epstein? Answer no, it was, as

399
00:22:04.079 --> 00:22:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you said, several meetings at his New York residence and

400
00:22:06.960 --> 00:22:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the one meeting in Paris, and then the one time

401
00:22:09.480 --> 00:22:11.519
<v Speaker 1>we flew together on a plane from New York to

402
00:22:11.559 --> 00:22:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Pond Beach. Question, so let's talk briefly about the Manhattan

403
00:22:14.880 --> 00:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>town helm. Did you notice anything unusual during your visits there? Answer? Well,

404
00:22:20.160 --> 00:22:22.279
<v Speaker 1>I never went above the first floor. You know, there's

405
00:22:22.359 --> 00:22:24.559
<v Speaker 1>kind of a fancy door, and then you go up

406
00:22:24.559 --> 00:22:27.200
<v Speaker 1>some stairs and to the left is a room where

407
00:22:27.200 --> 00:22:29.880
<v Speaker 1>we had dinner and most of the meetings, and then

408
00:22:29.880 --> 00:22:31.799
<v Speaker 1>to the right is a large area I think he

409
00:22:31.880 --> 00:22:34.799
<v Speaker 1>called his office area, and then there's a bathroom on

410
00:22:34.839 --> 00:22:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that floor. And that's what I remember about the residence.

411
00:22:38.599 --> 00:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Question and there's been allegations that Epstein had cameras that

412
00:22:42.319 --> 00:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>he would use to blackmail visitors. Did you notice any

413
00:22:45.000 --> 00:22:49.559
<v Speaker 1>cameras when you visited? Answer? I did not. Question during

414
00:22:49.559 --> 00:22:52.599
<v Speaker 1>the committee's review of documents produced by the estate, as

415
00:22:52.599 --> 00:22:54.799
<v Speaker 1>well as photos that had been released as part of

416
00:22:54.799 --> 00:22:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the Epstein Files Transparency Act. This is my own characterization,

417
00:22:59.119 --> 00:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>but it seems that mister Epstein had an unusual creepy

418
00:23:02.240 --> 00:23:05.880
<v Speaker 1>taste in artwork. Did you notice any unusual weird artwork

419
00:23:06.039 --> 00:23:09.039
<v Speaker 1>when you visited the home? Answer? I know there was

420
00:23:09.079 --> 00:23:11.519
<v Speaker 1>one thing he had that was a bit strange. Was

421
00:23:11.559 --> 00:23:14.799
<v Speaker 1>it like Bill Clinton? An address? That was one thing

422
00:23:15.000 --> 00:23:17.559
<v Speaker 1>that it was Bill Clinton in address I think, which

423
00:23:17.599 --> 00:23:21.039
<v Speaker 1>I think fits your description. Question did you ask him

424
00:23:21.039 --> 00:23:24.880
<v Speaker 1>about that specific portrait? Answer? I did not. Question And

425
00:23:24.960 --> 00:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, did you notice any nude photos displayed

426
00:23:27.720 --> 00:23:30.559
<v Speaker 1>at his property? Answer? No, I mean the only two

427
00:23:30.559 --> 00:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>properties I ever saw were New York and the Paris one,

428
00:23:33.599 --> 00:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't see any nude photos in either location.

429
00:23:37.400 --> 00:23:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Question and back to the photo of Bill Clinton. Where

430
00:23:39.599 --> 00:23:42.279
<v Speaker 1>was that? Answer? I don't think it was a photo honestly.

431
00:23:42.680 --> 00:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Question or the painting excuse me? Answer yeah, the artwork

432
00:23:45.920 --> 00:23:50.279
<v Speaker 1>that was on the wall inside his office. Question. Now,

433
00:23:50.319 --> 00:23:52.799
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned that you visited the property in Paris as well.

434
00:23:52.920 --> 00:23:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Did you notice anything unusual when you visited the property? Answer?

435
00:23:56.680 --> 00:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I did not. Question a couple of weeks ago, the

436
00:24:00.519 --> 00:24:03.920
<v Speaker 1>committee interviewed Sarah Kellen, a survivor, and she said and

437
00:24:04.000 --> 00:24:06.359
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that mister Epstein had a painting or a photo

438
00:24:06.720 --> 00:24:09.319
<v Speaker 1>or a naked photo of her displayed at the property.

439
00:24:09.839 --> 00:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>You didn't see a photo of miss Kellen? Is that right? Answer? No,

440
00:24:13.359 --> 00:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know the extent of that property.

441
00:24:15.599 --> 00:24:17.759
<v Speaker 1>We went into this room or we sat in the

442
00:24:17.799 --> 00:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>excess food was brought to us there, but we didn't

443
00:24:20.680 --> 00:24:23.799
<v Speaker 1>go to other rooms. All right, folks, we're gonna wrap

444
00:24:23.880 --> 00:24:26.680
<v Speaker 1>up right here, and in the next episode, we're gonna

445
00:24:26.720 --> 00:24:30.079
<v Speaker 1>pick up where we left off. All the information that

446
00:24:30.119 --> 00:24:33.640
<v Speaker 1>goes with this episode can be found in the description box.

447
00:24:33.839 --> 00:24:36.920
<v Speaker 1>What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the

448
00:24:36.920 --> 00:24:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Epstein Chronicles. In this episode, we're gonna pick up where

449
00:24:40.680 --> 00:24:45.119
<v Speaker 1>we left off with the Bill Gates transcript with Congress

450
00:24:45.759 --> 00:24:49.440
<v Speaker 1>question by mister Spector. Now question, Thank you, mister Gates.

451
00:24:50.079 --> 00:24:52.519
<v Speaker 1>You already testified in the last hour you gave no

452
00:24:52.640 --> 00:24:56.839
<v Speaker 1>financial payments. You had no financial arrangement or payments with

453
00:24:56.960 --> 00:25:00.799
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Epstein. Is that right answered? That is right? Question?

454
00:25:01.000 --> 00:25:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Just want to clarify a little bit using a document,

455
00:25:03.640 --> 00:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>so I'll enter as majority. Exhibit five A contract from

456
00:25:07.240 --> 00:25:11.079
<v Speaker 1>the Epstein owned entity Southern Trust Company, Incorporated, dated May

457
00:25:11.119 --> 00:25:14.599
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighth, twenty thirteen. This is from the DOJ's release.

458
00:25:15.240 --> 00:25:19.680
<v Speaker 1>It's mark with bates number EFTA zero one one one

459
00:25:19.799 --> 00:25:22.920
<v Speaker 1>one nine six one. I'll give you a moment to

460
00:25:22.920 --> 00:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>look at it. It seems to be a contract of

461
00:25:25.039 --> 00:25:28.920
<v Speaker 1>some kind for consulting services. Answer between who and who?

462
00:25:30.400 --> 00:25:32.759
<v Speaker 1>Question If you direct your attention to the second block

463
00:25:33.079 --> 00:25:35.599
<v Speaker 1>of texts, the second or third line up from the bottom.

464
00:25:35.599 --> 00:25:40.079
<v Speaker 1>It says Bill Gates and affiliated trusts, partnerships, limited partnerships,

465
00:25:40.400 --> 00:25:45.119
<v Speaker 1>and limited liability companies of and any other entities affiliated

466
00:25:45.279 --> 00:25:49.400
<v Speaker 1>with mister Gates. And then it says collectively clients because

467
00:25:49.400 --> 00:25:52.079
<v Speaker 1>the list of collection of clients. Do you have any

468
00:25:52.119 --> 00:25:54.599
<v Speaker 1>knowledge about whether you were a client of any of

469
00:25:54.599 --> 00:25:58.400
<v Speaker 1>those Southern Trust Company? Answer? I was not question have

470
00:25:58.519 --> 00:26:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you ever heard of the Southern Trust Company? Answer? I

471
00:26:01.640 --> 00:26:03.680
<v Speaker 1>believe this document was shown to me as part of

472
00:26:03.720 --> 00:26:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the Epstein files as one of the documents that my

473
00:26:06.559 --> 00:26:10.680
<v Speaker 1>name came up in a dishonest and misleading way. Question,

474
00:26:10.839 --> 00:26:14.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's your characterization, is that this is a dishonest

475
00:26:14.599 --> 00:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and misleading you know mentioned of you as a client.

476
00:26:18.200 --> 00:26:20.599
<v Speaker 1>Answer That might be a little strong because it doesn't

477
00:26:20.599 --> 00:26:22.799
<v Speaker 1>actually say I was a client, but it suggests that

478
00:26:22.839 --> 00:26:25.279
<v Speaker 1>I might be one of the clients. And I was

479
00:26:25.400 --> 00:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>never a client in any way of mister Epstein or

480
00:26:28.279 --> 00:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>any of his entities, including this thing that I don't

481
00:26:31.240 --> 00:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>know much about called Southern Trust Company. Question. Thank you,

482
00:26:35.599 --> 00:26:39.559
<v Speaker 1>mister Moran, asking questions again, Sorry, just for my record,

483
00:26:39.720 --> 00:26:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that was Mark five, mister Grant. Answer is yes, sir.

484
00:26:43.440 --> 00:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Now Emmer's back and prior to reviewing this document, had

485
00:26:46.960 --> 00:26:49.079
<v Speaker 1>you ever come to learn during the course of knowing

486
00:26:49.119 --> 00:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>mister Epstein that he was representing himself to you as

487
00:26:51.960 --> 00:26:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a client, Gates, I didn't know that he would represent that,

488
00:26:55.759 --> 00:27:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and it would have been a falsehood, Emmer, Thank you Grant.

489
00:27:00.480 --> 00:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Asking questions again, mister Gates. It seems, through the course

490
00:27:03.960 --> 00:27:06.519
<v Speaker 1>of reviewing the documents and as part of this interview

491
00:27:06.599 --> 00:27:09.559
<v Speaker 1>with you here today, that there were more than a

492
00:27:09.559 --> 00:27:12.599
<v Speaker 1>few people either associated with yourself and some of your

493
00:27:12.720 --> 00:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>ventures or Microsoft generally, that had a relationship with mister

494
00:27:16.440 --> 00:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Epstein at the time. Were you aware of all these

495
00:27:19.759 --> 00:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>associates of yours having relationships with some kind with mister Epstein. Answer, well,

496
00:27:25.319 --> 00:27:27.279
<v Speaker 1>I'll mention the three and then you can tell me

497
00:27:27.279 --> 00:27:30.359
<v Speaker 1>if there's more than that. I thought mister Nikolich had

498
00:27:30.359 --> 00:27:33.319
<v Speaker 1>a very limited relationship with mister Epstein in terms of

499
00:27:33.319 --> 00:27:36.160
<v Speaker 1>facilitating meetings that I had with him. You know, the

500
00:27:36.200 --> 00:27:39.799
<v Speaker 1>email show a more extensive relationship. I thought that doctor

501
00:27:39.839 --> 00:27:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Walker knew Epstein. He mentioned her to me one time

502
00:27:43.079 --> 00:27:45.519
<v Speaker 1>in our first dinner meeting, and then she sent me

503
00:27:45.519 --> 00:27:49.160
<v Speaker 1>an email asking about the meeting. Subsequently, I don't think

504
00:27:49.160 --> 00:27:53.039
<v Speaker 1>we communicated about Epstein, although apparently there's some possibility of

505
00:27:53.039 --> 00:27:56.759
<v Speaker 1>an August twenty fourteen email and that maybe that's an exception.

506
00:27:57.519 --> 00:27:59.759
<v Speaker 1>I'll have to track that down. So the extent of

507
00:27:59.759 --> 00:28:03.440
<v Speaker 1>her relationship with mister Epstein, I don't know. I think

508
00:28:03.480 --> 00:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>another name that came up with Steven Sinofsky, and I

509
00:28:06.319 --> 00:28:09.599
<v Speaker 1>did not know of him having any relationship with mister Epstein.

510
00:28:10.559 --> 00:28:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Question and what about mister Mirvold. I know he was

511
00:28:13.440 --> 00:28:15.680
<v Speaker 1>brought up at some point an earlier hour here today.

512
00:28:16.359 --> 00:28:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Question No, I never discussed mister Epstein with mister Meervold.

513
00:28:20.920 --> 00:28:23.559
<v Speaker 1>Question and you had no awareness of them having any

514
00:28:23.599 --> 00:28:27.039
<v Speaker 1>type of relationship at all at the time? Answer? I

515
00:28:27.039 --> 00:28:29.720
<v Speaker 1>know when Epstein files came out there was some things

516
00:28:29.759 --> 00:28:33.279
<v Speaker 1>related to mister Meervold having some relationship with mister Epstein.

517
00:28:33.640 --> 00:28:36.839
<v Speaker 1>But before that, I had a vague awareness of some

518
00:28:36.920 --> 00:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of the connection, and I don't know where that came from,

519
00:28:39.319 --> 00:28:42.759
<v Speaker 1>but we never discussed it. Question and what about mister

520
00:28:42.759 --> 00:28:45.599
<v Speaker 1>Reid Hoffman were you aware of him having a relationship

521
00:28:45.640 --> 00:28:49.799
<v Speaker 1>with mister Epstein. Answer? I did know that through some

522
00:28:49.920 --> 00:28:52.799
<v Speaker 1>MIT connection, but I'm not sure that mister Hoffman had

523
00:28:52.839 --> 00:28:56.559
<v Speaker 1>met mister Epstein. But I was never other than Actually,

524
00:28:56.759 --> 00:28:59.799
<v Speaker 1>there is a December breakfast, the final meeting with Epstein,

525
00:29:00.039 --> 00:29:02.759
<v Speaker 1>where I'm presenting a group of people about philanthropy and

526
00:29:02.839 --> 00:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>global health. Mister Hoffman attended that, and so did mister Epstein.

527
00:29:06.839 --> 00:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's one case where mister Hoffman and mister Epstein

528
00:29:09.680 --> 00:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and I were all together in the same place. Question

529
00:29:13.000 --> 00:29:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and did you ever discuss mister Epstein with mister Hoffman

530
00:29:16.559 --> 00:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>other than this one meeting you just mentioned? Answer? It

531
00:29:19.519 --> 00:29:21.559
<v Speaker 1>might have come up. You know that I talked to

532
00:29:21.599 --> 00:29:24.240
<v Speaker 1>mister Hoffman about a lot of things, but the fact

533
00:29:24.319 --> 00:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that he was kind of an unknown but a person

534
00:29:26.759 --> 00:29:29.359
<v Speaker 1>with a bad reputation that may have come up in

535
00:29:29.400 --> 00:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>my conversation with mister Hoffman. Question and mister Cohen, I'll

536
00:29:34.480 --> 00:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>call it a relationship with mister Epstein. Is that due

537
00:29:37.000 --> 00:29:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to his own accord or is that because of his

538
00:29:39.000 --> 00:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>close proximity to you? Answer? I wouldn't call it a relationship.

539
00:29:43.319 --> 00:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, on my behalf, if you was involved, particularly

540
00:29:46.480 --> 00:29:49.559
<v Speaker 1>in the doctor Nikolic exit discussions, but I wouldn't call

541
00:29:49.559 --> 00:29:53.799
<v Speaker 1>that a relationship. Question fair enough, And did mister Epstein

542
00:29:53.839 --> 00:29:56.319
<v Speaker 1>ever ask you to hire someone to either Microsoft or

543
00:29:56.359 --> 00:30:00.839
<v Speaker 1>any of your other ventures? Answer never. Question Are you

544
00:30:00.920 --> 00:30:03.640
<v Speaker 1>aware of anyone at Microsoft or any of your other

545
00:30:03.759 --> 00:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>ventures giving any type of inside investment information? Answer no. Question.

546
00:30:08.880 --> 00:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Did mister Epstein ever ask you for any type of

547
00:30:11.039 --> 00:30:16.359
<v Speaker 1>inside investment information to your companies or adventures? Answer no. Question.

548
00:30:16.640 --> 00:30:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Did you ever discuss any stocks or trades or anything

549
00:30:19.440 --> 00:30:24.839
<v Speaker 1>related to financial markets with mister Epstein? Answer no. Well,

550
00:30:24.920 --> 00:30:27.720
<v Speaker 1>let me amend that. I mean the general idea of

551
00:30:27.799 --> 00:30:30.359
<v Speaker 1>where markets going up or going down that came up

552
00:30:30.400 --> 00:30:33.640
<v Speaker 1>in some discussions, but not any specific company that was

553
00:30:33.680 --> 00:30:37.319
<v Speaker 1>going to happen with its stock questions, So mister Epstein

554
00:30:37.559 --> 00:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have a conversation with you then about a particular company,

555
00:30:40.720 --> 00:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>say Tesla, And say you should short this stock or

556
00:30:43.440 --> 00:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>buy this stock? Answer no, Specter, just one quick question

557
00:30:47.680 --> 00:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>for the last couple of sections here. Did any law

558
00:30:50.000 --> 00:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>enforcement entity of any kind ever approach you or ask

559
00:30:53.000 --> 00:30:56.319
<v Speaker 1>for information about Epstein or Glenn Maxwell? Answer? Yeah, I

560
00:30:56.359 --> 00:30:58.599
<v Speaker 1>think my lawyers can probably do a better job on

561
00:30:58.640 --> 00:31:00.680
<v Speaker 1>this than I can. But I think the US Virgin

562
00:31:00.720 --> 00:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Islands conducted a voluntary interview with me, miss Claire. Yeah,

563
00:31:04.559 --> 00:31:07.079
<v Speaker 1>if I could just clarify, the Attorney General of the

564
00:31:07.160 --> 00:31:10.319
<v Speaker 1>US Virgin Islands made an informal request to mister Gates

565
00:31:10.359 --> 00:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to cooperate with its investigation, very much like he did here.

566
00:31:14.640 --> 00:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Mister Gates cooperated voluntarily. We turned over some documents to

567
00:31:18.720 --> 00:31:22.119
<v Speaker 1>the Attorney General, and mister Gates sat for a voluntary

568
00:31:22.160 --> 00:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>proffer with the representatives of the US Virgin Islands. Specter.

569
00:31:26.559 --> 00:31:29.599
<v Speaker 1>What sort of documents to the Virgin Islands, request Claire?

570
00:31:29.759 --> 00:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>They from recollection. They related mostly to financial documents. It

571
00:31:33.759 --> 00:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>was in connection with, you know, tax questions primarily, and

572
00:31:37.079 --> 00:31:40.279
<v Speaker 1>it related to J. P. Morgan Chase and some banking issues,

573
00:31:40.799 --> 00:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>So it was primarily focused on that, mister Grant, And

574
00:31:45.519 --> 00:31:48.200
<v Speaker 1>just so the record's clear, no one from the Southern

575
00:31:48.200 --> 00:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>District of New York ever reached out to you during

576
00:31:50.440 --> 00:31:54.599
<v Speaker 1>Epstein's troubles when he was arrested subsequently in twenty nineteen,

577
00:31:55.200 --> 00:31:58.799
<v Speaker 1>answer no question, and the same question for miss Maxwell

578
00:31:59.079 --> 00:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>during her arrest twenty twenty one, answer no question. Thank you,

579
00:32:03.680 --> 00:32:07.599
<v Speaker 1>specter asking questions again, mister Gates. We do sort of

580
00:32:07.720 --> 00:32:10.039
<v Speaker 1>a format in some of our interviews. I'm going to

581
00:32:10.079 --> 00:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>read you a long list of names. The question is

582
00:32:12.240 --> 00:32:16.559
<v Speaker 1>the same for each person. Answer okay, question, It's simply

583
00:32:16.599 --> 00:32:19.880
<v Speaker 1>have you ever communicated with that person? Regarding Jeffrey Epstein

584
00:32:20.200 --> 00:32:23.279
<v Speaker 1>or Glenn Maxwell? And there may be some repetition. I'll

585
00:32:23.279 --> 00:32:25.119
<v Speaker 1>try to cut out the ones that we've already talked

586
00:32:25.119 --> 00:32:27.400
<v Speaker 1>about for the most part. So for the first one,

587
00:32:27.599 --> 00:32:32.799
<v Speaker 1>Richard Kahn answer no, never communicated with them question. Darren

588
00:32:32.880 --> 00:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Endyke answer no question. Leslie Groff answer, I don't believe so.

589
00:32:37.680 --> 00:32:39.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, she might have been on some of the

590
00:32:39.119 --> 00:32:42.359
<v Speaker 1>email chain, but I don't think I communicated with her. Question.

591
00:32:42.480 --> 00:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Kellen answer again, she might have been on the chain,

592
00:32:46.160 --> 00:32:48.400
<v Speaker 1>but I never communicated with her. Or I don't know.

593
00:32:48.480 --> 00:32:50.799
<v Speaker 1>Maybe she's one of the women I wasn't introduced to

594
00:32:50.880 --> 00:32:53.799
<v Speaker 1>in the photos. I'm not sure question. When you say

595
00:32:53.799 --> 00:32:55.799
<v Speaker 1>that miss Groff and Miss Kellen may have been on

596
00:32:55.839 --> 00:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the email chain, do you mean an email chain along

597
00:32:58.200 --> 00:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>with mister Epstein. Answer yes. Question next person Doug Band

598
00:33:02.160 --> 00:33:06.599
<v Speaker 1>answer no question. Larry Summers answer yes, as I've discussed

599
00:33:06.599 --> 00:33:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Summers came to a dinner, which is the second

600
00:33:09.039 --> 00:33:12.039
<v Speaker 1>time I met Epstein and other than that, no question.

601
00:33:12.480 --> 00:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever discussed Jeffrey Epstein's crimes allegations against Jeffrey

602
00:33:17.880 --> 00:33:22.519
<v Speaker 1>Epstein with Larry Summers answer no question. Noam Chomsky answer no,

603
00:33:22.640 --> 00:33:25.319
<v Speaker 1>I never met Noam Chomsky. I know it's worked very well.

604
00:33:25.440 --> 00:33:27.359
<v Speaker 1>I think he's fairly old now, but I never met

605
00:33:27.440 --> 00:33:31.079
<v Speaker 1>him or talk to him. Question redacted. I don't recognize

606
00:33:31.079 --> 00:33:35.519
<v Speaker 1>that name, so no question. Alan Dershowitz answer no question.

607
00:33:35.759 --> 00:33:41.160
<v Speaker 1>George Mitchell answer no question. Andrew Mountbatten Windsor formerly Prince

608
00:33:41.200 --> 00:33:45.559
<v Speaker 1>Andrew answer yeah, I never nothing connected to Epstein. I

609
00:33:45.640 --> 00:33:48.119
<v Speaker 1>encountered him two times and official visits in the UK

610
00:33:48.519 --> 00:33:50.880
<v Speaker 1>where he was serving as something like the trade representative.

611
00:33:51.519 --> 00:33:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Question but never about Epstein? Answer never about Epstein? Question okay,

612
00:33:56.359 --> 00:33:58.759
<v Speaker 1>answer weirdly in the set of photos that I guess

613
00:33:58.759 --> 00:34:01.839
<v Speaker 1>Epstein kept a photo of me and Prince Andrew at

614
00:34:01.880 --> 00:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>one of those official state meetings, but nothing in connection

615
00:34:05.279 --> 00:34:08.280
<v Speaker 1>with Epstein, even though Epstein seemed to have that picture

616
00:34:08.400 --> 00:34:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and it shows up in the Epstein files. Question that's right.

617
00:34:12.000 --> 00:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you recall if Jeffrey Epstein was also in attendance

618
00:34:14.639 --> 00:34:18.039
<v Speaker 1>at that state dinner? Answer never, question he definitely wasn't

619
00:34:18.079 --> 00:34:20.960
<v Speaker 1>in attendance there. Answer no, I never saw him in

620
00:34:20.960 --> 00:34:23.679
<v Speaker 1>the UK and those were both meetings in the UK.

621
00:34:24.320 --> 00:34:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Question thank you, Peter Mandelsson answer no question. Corinia Shuliac answer,

622
00:34:30.840 --> 00:34:34.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Is that one of his assistants. Question

623
00:34:34.280 --> 00:34:37.119
<v Speaker 1>she's reported to have dated mister Epstein. Just if you

624
00:34:37.199 --> 00:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>recall having a conversation with these people about Jeffrey Epstein

625
00:34:40.079 --> 00:34:43.800
<v Speaker 1>or Ghlainne Maxwell answer? The only time I recall a

626
00:34:43.840 --> 00:34:46.719
<v Speaker 1>meeting was earlier today. Someone sitting on that side of

627
00:34:46.719 --> 00:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the table said that a person that I couldn't identify

628
00:34:49.480 --> 00:34:51.800
<v Speaker 1>in a photo had that name. Question but you don't

629
00:34:51.800 --> 00:34:54.599
<v Speaker 1>recall any specifics of any conversation with her if you

630
00:34:54.639 --> 00:34:58.480
<v Speaker 1>had one? Answer no, apparently though I was photographed with her.

631
00:34:58.599 --> 00:35:02.159
<v Speaker 1>I think somebody represented that here today. Question thank you,

632
00:35:02.320 --> 00:35:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Edward Brock answer no question. Paul Morris answer yeah, I

633
00:35:06.440 --> 00:35:11.840
<v Speaker 1>don't recognize that name. Question. Sultan Achmed Binsuliam answer no question.

634
00:35:12.119 --> 00:35:17.199
<v Speaker 1>Leslie Wexner answer no question. Harvey Weinstein answer no question.

635
00:35:17.599 --> 00:35:20.599
<v Speaker 1>Any member of the Rothschild family answer no. It's a

636
00:35:20.639 --> 00:35:23.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, but still no question. There are several

637
00:35:23.840 --> 00:35:26.360
<v Speaker 1>names I can read if you would like, answer no, no,

638
00:35:26.440 --> 00:35:31.400
<v Speaker 1>please question. Casey Wasserman answer no question. Stacey Plaskett answer,

639
00:35:31.440 --> 00:35:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who that is. Question. Howard Lutnik answer no,

640
00:35:34.679 --> 00:35:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Steve Bannon answer no. Elon Musk answer no. Abigail Johnson

641
00:35:39.400 --> 00:35:43.800
<v Speaker 1>answer no. Jeff Bezos answer no. Larry Page answer nope,

642
00:35:44.239 --> 00:35:48.199
<v Speaker 1>Sergey Brynn answer no question. President Bill Clinton answer no,

643
00:35:48.559 --> 00:35:53.039
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Hillary Clinton, no question. I don't think I said.

644
00:35:53.480 --> 00:35:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Other than the one meeting where Ted Waite was Glenn Maxwell,

645
00:35:56.599 --> 00:35:59.320
<v Speaker 1>have you ever discussed Jeffrey Epstein or Glenn Maxwell with

646
00:35:59.440 --> 00:36:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Ted Waite? Answer no, mister Gates, just a couple of

647
00:36:03.480 --> 00:36:06.440
<v Speaker 1>final questions for you, so your relationship. Can you remind

648
00:36:06.519 --> 00:36:09.840
<v Speaker 1>us for the record when your relationship with mister Epstein, formally,

649
00:36:10.079 --> 00:36:13.039
<v Speaker 1>when you cut off ties with mister Epstein other than

650
00:36:13.079 --> 00:36:16.880
<v Speaker 1>his couple of reachouts. Answer after the December meeting in

651
00:36:16.920 --> 00:36:21.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen question, and during the last hour you discussed

652
00:36:21.360 --> 00:36:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the final few meetings or discussions

653
00:36:25.000 --> 00:36:27.880
<v Speaker 1>with regard to the donor advised funds with mister Epstein

654
00:36:28.239 --> 00:36:31.519
<v Speaker 1>that was in twenty fourteen. Is that right answer? That's

655
00:36:31.599 --> 00:36:35.239
<v Speaker 1>right question. And I'm just trying to understand after the

656
00:36:35.280 --> 00:36:38.519
<v Speaker 1>summer of twenty thirteen and all of the various emails

657
00:36:38.800 --> 00:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>we discussed again acknowledging some of them, you didn't know

658
00:36:42.000 --> 00:36:44.400
<v Speaker 1>about it at the time, But regardless the interactions you

659
00:36:44.480 --> 00:36:47.440
<v Speaker 1>had with mister Epstein where he was making veiled threats

660
00:36:47.440 --> 00:36:51.239
<v Speaker 1>about personal issues, including your affairs, why did you continue

661
00:36:51.239 --> 00:36:57.039
<v Speaker 1>to engage with mister Epstein about philanthropy going into twenty fourteen? Answer? Well,

662
00:36:57.079 --> 00:36:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, the doctor Nikolach exit, you know, ended up

663
00:36:59.480 --> 00:37:02.000
<v Speaker 1>exactly as it started, with something that I felt was fair,

664
00:37:02.320 --> 00:37:05.639
<v Speaker 1>and Doctor Nikolch ended up deciding was fair. And so

665
00:37:05.719 --> 00:37:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that was kind of a weird thing, and I admit

666
00:37:07.880 --> 00:37:10.679
<v Speaker 1>it should have added to the many negative things about

667
00:37:10.719 --> 00:37:13.559
<v Speaker 1>mister Epstein. And then in the fall, I have the

668
00:37:13.599 --> 00:37:16.639
<v Speaker 1>dinner where my ex took her already somewhat negative view

669
00:37:16.639 --> 00:37:19.039
<v Speaker 1>of mister Epstein and felt that she had met him

670
00:37:19.039 --> 00:37:21.599
<v Speaker 1>in person that one time she had an even more

671
00:37:21.639 --> 00:37:23.599
<v Speaker 1>negative view of him. You know, there was a lot

672
00:37:23.639 --> 00:37:26.039
<v Speaker 1>of things saying that you know the risk of even

673
00:37:26.320 --> 00:37:29.239
<v Speaker 1>in this very limited role, which was referring me to

674
00:37:29.320 --> 00:37:32.480
<v Speaker 1>people not being paid, not playing any role, that I

675
00:37:32.519 --> 00:37:35.400
<v Speaker 1>should have had better judgment to cut it off. And

676
00:37:35.480 --> 00:37:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I would say that I was a bit stubborn in thinking, hey,

677
00:37:38.519 --> 00:37:41.119
<v Speaker 1>was this completely a dead end? And so I continued

678
00:37:41.159 --> 00:37:44.639
<v Speaker 1>through twenty fourteen to try to get meetings with actual donors,

679
00:37:45.119 --> 00:37:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and then in September I got that then there's one

680
00:37:48.920 --> 00:37:52.639
<v Speaker 1>more breakfast where I presented philanthropic opportunities and only then

681
00:37:52.679 --> 00:37:56.559
<v Speaker 1>did I completely abandon any connection with them. Question and

682
00:37:56.639 --> 00:37:58.440
<v Speaker 1>did you formally tell him at this point that you

683
00:37:58.480 --> 00:38:01.519
<v Speaker 1>didn't wish to see or speak to him anymore? Answer?

684
00:38:01.519 --> 00:38:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I think my final email to him says, hey, the

685
00:38:04.480 --> 00:38:06.760
<v Speaker 1>raising money isn't going to work. And so, because that

686
00:38:06.880 --> 00:38:09.239
<v Speaker 1>was clearly the thing I had focused time on, that

687
00:38:09.360 --> 00:38:12.440
<v Speaker 1>was clearly the end of the relationship. He continued to

688
00:38:12.480 --> 00:38:15.679
<v Speaker 1>email me, and so through Larry Cohen, not in an email,

689
00:38:15.920 --> 00:38:18.400
<v Speaker 1>because I sent the final one email and that was it.

690
00:38:18.599 --> 00:38:21.079
<v Speaker 1>But mister Cohen made it clear to mister Abstein that

691
00:38:21.159 --> 00:38:24.239
<v Speaker 1>I had severed the relationship completely and that I wouldn't

692
00:38:24.239 --> 00:38:27.880
<v Speaker 1>be seeing me or hearing from me. Question and one

693
00:38:27.880 --> 00:38:31.239
<v Speaker 1>final question for you. When we were discussing earlier about

694
00:38:31.239 --> 00:38:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the two initial extramarital affairs and then we talked about

695
00:38:34.400 --> 00:38:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a third one, one of the reasons you gave for

696
00:38:36.960 --> 00:38:39.440
<v Speaker 1>those being the only ones that are relevant to the

697
00:38:39.480 --> 00:38:43.559
<v Speaker 1>committee's inquiry was being because mister Abstein had anything else

698
00:38:43.599 --> 00:38:46.639
<v Speaker 1>bad to say about you, any other damaging information about you,

699
00:38:47.199 --> 00:38:49.679
<v Speaker 1>than he would have written it elsewhere in the emails.

700
00:38:49.920 --> 00:38:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Is that a fair characterization of what you said? Answer? Yeah,

701
00:38:53.360 --> 00:38:55.800
<v Speaker 1>he managed to put it in some true embarrassing things,

702
00:38:56.079 --> 00:38:58.960
<v Speaker 1>specifically the affairs, and then he managed to put in

703
00:38:59.000 --> 00:39:01.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot of false things. And so I think if

704
00:39:01.199 --> 00:39:03.840
<v Speaker 1>he had known anything negative about me, it would have

705
00:39:03.840 --> 00:39:06.760
<v Speaker 1>shown up in those. But that's all speculation based on

706
00:39:06.800 --> 00:39:09.559
<v Speaker 1>what I've seen in January of this year. You know,

707
00:39:09.679 --> 00:39:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the foolishness of my spending time with them is about

708
00:39:12.320 --> 00:39:16.599
<v Speaker 1>one hundred times higher after I seen the January emails. Question. Okay,

709
00:39:16.639 --> 00:39:19.519
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Chairman Comber. Mister Gates on behalf of the

710
00:39:19.519 --> 00:39:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Oversight Committee and the entire Congress, I want to thank

711
00:39:22.719 --> 00:39:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you for coming in today. Voluntarily. Thank you for answering

712
00:39:25.840 --> 00:39:28.599
<v Speaker 1>our questions. And I have to conclude by thanking you

713
00:39:28.719 --> 00:39:31.800
<v Speaker 1>for your philanthropy and all the great charitable work that

714
00:39:31.880 --> 00:39:35.519
<v Speaker 1>you've done and will hopefully continue to do. So. Thank

715
00:39:35.599 --> 00:39:38.199
<v Speaker 1>you Gates. Know that will be the focus of the

716
00:39:38.199 --> 00:39:40.320
<v Speaker 1>rest of my life. And I don't know if anything

717
00:39:40.400 --> 00:39:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I did today is helpful in your request, but I

718
00:39:42.920 --> 00:39:46.280
<v Speaker 1>hope you can find justice for the victims. Chairman Comber,

719
00:39:46.400 --> 00:39:49.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Specter, thank you, sir. We can go off

720
00:39:49.400 --> 00:39:53.679
<v Speaker 1>the record, all right, folks. There it is the transcript

721
00:39:54.360 --> 00:39:58.920
<v Speaker 1>from Bill Gates and his interview with Congress. The next

722
00:39:58.920 --> 00:40:02.400
<v Speaker 1>one we're going to move into is Leslie Groff. All

723
00:40:02.400 --> 00:40:05.199
<v Speaker 1>the information that goes with this episode can be found

724
00:40:05.480 --> 00:40:06.639
<v Speaker 1>in the description box.
