WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.120 --> 00:00:03.279
<v Speaker 1>What's up, everyone, and welcome back to the program. In

2
00:00:03.319 --> 00:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>this episode, we're going to pick up where we left

3
00:00:05.440 --> 00:00:11.039
<v Speaker 1>off talking about Larry Vasaski. The government clearly understood Avasaski

4
00:00:11.119 --> 00:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>mattered because federal prosecutors placed him before the jury during

5
00:00:14.839 --> 00:00:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Maxwell's criminal trial. His testimony helped establish the internal architecture

6
00:00:19.920 --> 00:00:24.079
<v Speaker 1>of Epstein's world before survivors testified about what occurred within it.

7
00:00:25.519 --> 00:00:30.719
<v Speaker 1>That prosecutorial decision alone demonstrates that Vasaski was not considered irrelevant,

8
00:00:31.120 --> 00:00:35.520
<v Speaker 1>yet being useful enough to establish Epstein's operational environment raises

9
00:00:35.560 --> 00:00:42.039
<v Speaker 1>another question about whether authorities fully explored contradictions, inconsistencies, or

10
00:00:42.240 --> 00:00:47.039
<v Speaker 1>gaps between what employees said they observed and what survivors described.

11
00:00:48.039 --> 00:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>The point of an investigation is not to presume guilt,

12
00:00:51.200 --> 00:00:57.039
<v Speaker 1>but to subject potentially important witnesses to documentary verification. With Vasoski,

13
00:00:57.200 --> 00:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>decades of records existed against which his RECQORAE elections could

14
00:01:00.880 --> 00:01:05.680
<v Speaker 1>theoretically be compared, making his position exceptionally valuable to anyone

15
00:01:05.719 --> 00:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>determined to reconstruct the entire enterprise. Consider what a pilot

16
00:01:10.640 --> 00:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>necessarily knows even without ever witnessing conduct occurring behind a

17
00:01:14.840 --> 00:01:18.719
<v Speaker 1>closed cabin door. He knows destinations because he must physically

18
00:01:18.719 --> 00:01:22.079
<v Speaker 1>fly the aircraft to them. He knows approximate travel dates

19
00:01:22.359 --> 00:01:25.719
<v Speaker 1>because he's responsible for making the flight happen. He knows

20
00:01:25.760 --> 00:01:31.319
<v Speaker 1>many passengers because aviation regulations and operational requirements make passenger

21
00:01:31.359 --> 00:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>identity and aircraft loading relevant. He knows which locations are

22
00:01:36.120 --> 00:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>visited repeatedly and which journeys depart unexpectedly. He knows which

23
00:01:40.799 --> 00:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>employees communicate travel instructions and which individuals receive special treatment.

24
00:01:46.280 --> 00:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>He knows when aircraft are repositioned without Epsteina a board

25
00:01:50.239 --> 00:01:53.599
<v Speaker 1>and when another crew members takes over. He knows how

26
00:01:53.599 --> 00:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>often particular properties are visited and whether certain passengers recur

27
00:01:57.760 --> 00:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>on particular routes. That's why Yasaski's value to investigators should

28
00:02:02.040 --> 00:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>have extended far beyond asking the narrow question of whether

29
00:02:05.879 --> 00:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>he personally witnessed sexual activity aboard the plane. The famous

30
00:02:10.280 --> 00:02:14.759
<v Speaker 1>cockpit door explanation illustrates exactly why the questioning surrounding Vasaski

31
00:02:15.120 --> 00:02:19.439
<v Speaker 1>has remained controversial. Vasaski testified that the cockpit door was

32
00:02:19.479 --> 00:02:22.599
<v Speaker 1>closed while he was flying and denied seeing sexual activity

33
00:02:22.879 --> 00:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>aboard Epstein's aircraft. Taken literally, that could perfectly well explain

34
00:02:27.319 --> 00:02:31.759
<v Speaker 1>why a pilot actively controlling an aircraft did not observe

35
00:02:31.800 --> 00:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>events occurring inside the passenger cabin. But the relevant investigative

36
00:02:36.400 --> 00:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>inquiry should never have ended with whether the pilot physically

37
00:02:40.039 --> 00:02:45.199
<v Speaker 1>watched the sex act while airborne. Epstein's operation extended across decades,

38
00:02:45.400 --> 00:02:50.199
<v Speaker 1>thousands of miles, numerous residences, and countless interactions on the ground.

39
00:02:50.960 --> 00:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Pilots leave cockpits, arrive at hangers, wait for passengers, observe departures,

40
00:02:56.000 --> 00:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>coordinate vehicles, communicate with staff, and spend considerable time around

41
00:03:00.360 --> 00:03:05.319
<v Speaker 1>employers outside the few hours during which they're manipulating aircraft control.

42
00:03:06.400 --> 00:03:10.199
<v Speaker 1>Vossaske's own long tenure meant his interaction with Epstein's universe

43
00:03:10.479 --> 00:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>necessarily extended across an enormous period. An investigator interested only

44
00:03:16.280 --> 00:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in what he could see through a cockpit doorway would

45
00:03:19.120 --> 00:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>therefore be asking an artificially narrow question. The meaningful issue

46
00:03:24.120 --> 00:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>was what patterns Vasaski observed over nearly thirty years, and

47
00:03:28.360 --> 00:03:33.039
<v Speaker 1>whether those patterns matched what prosecutors eventually established about Epstein

48
00:03:33.039 --> 00:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and Maxwell. The absence of direct eyewitness testimony to sexual

49
00:03:37.280 --> 00:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>conduct does not eliminate the enormous, circumstantial and logistical knowledge

50
00:03:42.439 --> 00:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a long time insider like Vasaski might possess. I think

51
00:03:47.280 --> 00:03:52.439
<v Speaker 1>that Maxwell's trial demonstrated this distinction particularly well because Vasaski's

52
00:03:52.479 --> 00:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>testimony helped jurors understand that hierarchy. He betrayed Maxwell as

53
00:03:57.159 --> 00:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>an extremely important figure in Epstein's life, effectively identifying her

54
00:04:01.560 --> 00:04:04.759
<v Speaker 1>as second only at Epstein within the environment he observed,

55
00:04:05.120 --> 00:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and that was a scorcher. Because Maxwell's defense attempted to

56
00:04:08.840 --> 00:04:13.439
<v Speaker 1>distance her from the responsibility of Epstein's conduct. Vysoski could

57
00:04:13.439 --> 00:04:16.279
<v Speaker 1>speak to her importance because he had spent years watching

58
00:04:16.279 --> 00:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>how Epstein's world actually worked. That is, institutional knowledge in

59
00:04:21.759 --> 00:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>its purest form. Organizations often have formal titles that tell

60
00:04:26.079 --> 00:04:31.279
<v Speaker 1>outsiders very little, while employees understand exactly who possesses real authority.

61
00:04:31.959 --> 00:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Veyssoski's description of Maxwell revealed that he understood at least

62
00:04:36.040 --> 00:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>some of those internal power dynamics. If he could identify

63
00:04:39.720 --> 00:04:43.439
<v Speaker 1>the hierarchy at the very top, investigators had obvious reasons

64
00:04:43.639 --> 00:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to ask what else he understood about the people operating

65
00:04:46.759 --> 00:04:51.639
<v Speaker 1>beneath it, who requested flights, who arrange passengers, who travel repeatedly,

66
00:04:51.800 --> 00:04:56.279
<v Speaker 1>who greeted arrivals, who control properties, and who communicated Epstein's

67
00:04:56.319 --> 00:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>instructions were all questions falling naturally within his observational universe.

68
00:05:02.120 --> 00:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Once again, none of these answers necessarily would have implicated

69
00:05:05.639 --> 00:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Vesoski himself, but they could have helped map a conspiracy

70
00:05:08.920 --> 00:05:14.759
<v Speaker 1>much broader than two people eventually prosecuted federally. And this

71
00:05:14.839 --> 00:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>is why the government's historically narrow handling of the Epstein

72
00:05:18.000 --> 00:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>investigation becomes impossible to separate from the Vesosky question. Epstein's

73
00:05:23.680 --> 00:05:29.079
<v Speaker 1>criminal world contained recruiters, schedulers, household employees, pilots, financial professionals,

74
00:05:29.279 --> 00:05:33.639
<v Speaker 1>property personnel, and numerous other people who interacted with different

75
00:05:33.680 --> 00:05:38.480
<v Speaker 1>pieces of his existence. A serious enterprise investigation should have

76
00:05:38.519 --> 00:05:42.759
<v Speaker 1>attempted to determine where innocent employment ended, where wilful blindness

77
00:05:42.800 --> 00:05:47.639
<v Speaker 1>may have begun, and where knowing facilitation could potentially be established.

78
00:05:48.959 --> 00:05:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Those categories are legally and morally different, and collapsing them

79
00:05:53.160 --> 00:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>together would be unfair, but refusing to explore them would

80
00:05:57.839 --> 00:06:02.399
<v Speaker 1>be equally unacceptable. Federal conspiracy law does not punish someone

81
00:06:02.480 --> 00:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>merely for working for a criminal, nor does association transform

82
00:06:06.160 --> 00:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>an employee into a conspirator. Prosecutors generally need evidence demonstrating

83
00:06:11.720 --> 00:06:17.199
<v Speaker 1>knowing participation in an unlawful agreement or another independently chargeable offense,

84
00:06:18.199 --> 00:06:23.199
<v Speaker 1>but determining whether such evidence exists requires aggressive investigation of

85
00:06:23.279 --> 00:06:27.279
<v Speaker 1>the very insiders most capable of explaining the organization, and

86
00:06:27.399 --> 00:06:30.959
<v Speaker 1>vesosky Is extraordinarily long tenure put him near the top

87
00:06:31.000 --> 00:06:36.519
<v Speaker 1>of that list. And of course, Epstein's aircraft were particularly

88
00:06:36.560 --> 00:06:41.600
<v Speaker 1>important because geography was central to a system. Survivors described

89
00:06:41.639 --> 00:06:45.839
<v Speaker 1>abuse at multiple properties, and Epstein's aeroplanes provided the bridge

90
00:06:46.040 --> 00:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>connecting those properties. Zora Ranch alone demonstrates why this matters,

91
00:06:51.240 --> 00:06:54.639
<v Speaker 1>because the secluded New Mexico compound sat far from the

92
00:06:54.639 --> 00:06:59.639
<v Speaker 1>scrutiny surrounding Manhattan or Upon Beach. According to survivor accounts

93
00:06:59.759 --> 00:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and subsequent investigations, abuse occurred at the ranch. While New

94
00:07:04.519 --> 00:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Mexico officials later complained that the property had never received

95
00:07:08.360 --> 00:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the federal investigative attention, its significance warranted. The failure to

96
00:07:12.560 --> 00:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>fully investigate Zoro Ranch when Epstein was alive also magnified

97
00:07:16.800 --> 00:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the importance of people like the Saski. Investigators can recover

98
00:07:20.879 --> 00:07:24.839
<v Speaker 1>physical evidence from a property, but they can't recover conversations

99
00:07:25.000 --> 00:07:29.519
<v Speaker 1>that disappeared decades earlier. Unless witnesses remember them or records

100
00:07:29.519 --> 00:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>captured them. Employees become living archives. In cases involving long

101
00:07:34.800 --> 00:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>running organizations, a long time pilot can potentially remember unusual

102
00:07:39.839 --> 00:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>passenger requests, recurring travel patterns, periods of intense activity, and

103
00:07:44.920 --> 00:07:49.879
<v Speaker 1>relationships that documents alone can explain, and these are exactly

104
00:07:49.920 --> 00:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the details that transform isolated documents into a coherent investigative chronology.

105
00:07:55.759 --> 00:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Vesoski decades of continuity made them unusually valuable because employees

106
00:08:01.160 --> 00:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>came and went while he remained, and allowing such institutional

107
00:08:04.959 --> 00:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>knowledge to disappear without exhaustive public accounting represents an enormous

108
00:08:10.360 --> 00:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>misopportunity in any investigation of Epstein's network. Then, of course,

109
00:08:15.839 --> 00:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>there's the issue of loyalty, a subject that can't be

110
00:08:18.639 --> 00:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>ignored when analyzing Epstein's inner circle. Epstein did not simply

111
00:08:22.759 --> 00:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>employ Vesoski briefly before moving on to another pilot. He

112
00:08:26.600 --> 00:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>kept them around for almost the entirety of the period

113
00:08:29.800 --> 00:08:33.600
<v Speaker 1>during which Epstein developed the lifestyle that eventually became inseparable

114
00:08:33.639 --> 00:08:39.879
<v Speaker 1>from allegations of systematic sexual abuse. Long term employment creates

115
00:08:40.080 --> 00:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>economic dependence and often personal loyalty, especially in the rarefied

116
00:08:44.679 --> 00:08:50.279
<v Speaker 1>environment of private aviation reports and records concerning land, financial arrangements,

117
00:08:50.320 --> 00:08:54.159
<v Speaker 1>and other benefits reinforce the impression that Vessoski's relationship with

118
00:08:54.200 --> 00:08:59.039
<v Speaker 1>Epstein exceeded a completely impersonal commercial transaction, and while that

119
00:08:59.120 --> 00:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>might not establish criminality, it does establish a relationship worthy

120
00:09:04.600 --> 00:09:08.799
<v Speaker 1>of careful examination, because loyalty can influence what employees notice,

121
00:09:09.080 --> 00:09:13.879
<v Speaker 1>what they rationalized, and what they eventually tell investigators. Epstein

122
00:09:14.120 --> 00:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>possessed enormous wealth and could substantially improve the lives of

123
00:09:17.399 --> 00:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>people whose cooperation he valued. Investigators confronting such a structure

124
00:09:22.279 --> 00:09:28.559
<v Speaker 1>should always examine whether benefits were ordinary compensation, generosity, retention incentives,

125
00:09:28.879 --> 00:09:32.879
<v Speaker 1>or something more complicated. The public deserves to know whether

126
00:09:32.919 --> 00:09:36.159
<v Speaker 1>those questions were pursued with the intensity appropriate to a

127
00:09:36.240 --> 00:09:41.279
<v Speaker 1>decade's long sex trafficking investigation, rather than simply assuming that

128
00:09:41.360 --> 00:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>employment relationships were innocent or sinister without doing the work.

129
00:09:47.440 --> 00:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>One of the most frustrating aspects of the Epstein saga

130
00:09:50.440 --> 00:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>is that the public repeatedly received fragments rather than a

131
00:09:53.879 --> 00:09:58.399
<v Speaker 1>complete organizational picture. We learned about the flight logs without

132
00:09:58.799 --> 00:10:02.200
<v Speaker 1>always receiving a compar yetsive explanation of the flights. We

133
00:10:02.279 --> 00:10:06.879
<v Speaker 1>learned about assistance without seeing every investigative interview conducted with them.

134
00:10:07.480 --> 00:10:10.679
<v Speaker 1>We learned about properties long after opportunities to search them

135
00:10:10.840 --> 00:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>had vanished. We learned about financial relationships through civil lawsuits

136
00:10:15.480 --> 00:10:19.679
<v Speaker 1>years after Epstein's first prosecution. We learned through Maxwell's trial

137
00:10:19.919 --> 00:10:24.440
<v Speaker 1>that longtime employees could describe internal hierarchy even while denying

138
00:10:24.480 --> 00:10:29.799
<v Speaker 1>awareness of criminal conduct. Thesaski embodies that fragmentation, perhaps better

139
00:10:29.960 --> 00:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>than almost anyone. His name appeared across flight records, testimony, correspondence,

140
00:10:35.559 --> 00:10:38.799
<v Speaker 1>and the broader history of Epstein's properties, but the public

141
00:10:39.039 --> 00:10:43.879
<v Speaker 1>has never received anything resembling a complete prosecatorial accounting of

142
00:10:43.919 --> 00:10:47.159
<v Speaker 1>what authorities determined about his knowledge. Look At the end

143
00:10:47.240 --> 00:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of the day, Larry Vsasky matters because Jeffrey Epstein could

144
00:10:51.240 --> 00:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>not have maintained his extraordinary lifestyle alone. Epstein required people

145
00:10:55.240 --> 00:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>who flew airplanes, maintained properties, arranged schedules, handled money and

146
00:11:00.039 --> 00:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>us through telephones, coordinated visitors, and solve problems. Some of

147
00:11:04.080 --> 00:11:08.399
<v Speaker 1>those people may have been entirely innocent employees performing legitimate

148
00:11:08.480 --> 00:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>jobs for an employer whose criminal conduct remained hidden from them.

149
00:11:13.000 --> 00:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Others could theoretically have possessed varying degrees of knowledge, suspicion,

150
00:11:17.440 --> 00:11:21.279
<v Speaker 1>or involvement, and only evidence can tell us where particular

151
00:11:21.320 --> 00:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>individuals belonged on that spectrum. Vososki's longevity and proximity make

152
00:11:28.039 --> 00:11:32.039
<v Speaker 1>him especially important because very few people observed Epstein's movements

153
00:11:32.240 --> 00:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>over such an extended period. He witnessed the evolution of

154
00:11:35.879 --> 00:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Epstein's empire from the early nineties through the years of

155
00:11:39.120 --> 00:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>criminal investigation, conviction, renewed social rehabilitation, and eventual federal arrest.

156
00:11:45.120 --> 00:11:50.440
<v Speaker 1>He transported Epstein while the financier accumulated powerful acquaintances and

157
00:11:50.480 --> 00:11:55.759
<v Speaker 1>maintained residences across multiple jurisdictions. He watched Maxwell occupy a

158
00:11:55.799 --> 00:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>position important enough that he later described her as Epstein's

159
00:11:59.360 --> 00:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>number two. He remained close enough to the operation that

160
00:12:03.639 --> 00:12:07.639
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors called him during the most consequential Epstein related criminal

161
00:12:07.679 --> 00:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>trial ever completed, and that's precisely why the lack of

162
00:12:11.000 --> 00:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>broader accountabilities surrounding Epstein's infrastructure remained so maddening. The federal

163
00:12:16.240 --> 00:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>government successfully convicted Glene Maxwell, proving beyond a reasonable doubt

164
00:12:20.600 --> 00:12:24.759
<v Speaker 1>that Epstein did not operate entirely alone. Once that proposition

165
00:12:25.000 --> 00:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>became legally established, the obvious investigative question was how far

166
00:12:29.799 --> 00:12:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the architecture of assistants extended. Not every employee was a conspirator,

167
00:12:34.679 --> 00:12:38.159
<v Speaker 1>and accusing people without evidence just produces the very kind

168
00:12:38.200 --> 00:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of injustice legitimate investigations are supposed to prevent. But an

169
00:12:42.919 --> 00:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>organization capable of moving Epstein's staff, young women, guests and

170
00:12:47.080 --> 00:12:52.639
<v Speaker 1>associates across numerous properties for years unquestionably depended upon infrastructure,

171
00:12:53.240 --> 00:12:56.279
<v Speaker 1>and aviation was one of the most important pieces of

172
00:12:56.279 --> 00:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that infrastructure. And Larry Vassoski sat inside that aviation operation

173
00:13:01.679 --> 00:13:04.639
<v Speaker 1>longer than anybody. And that's why it's important that Vasaski

174
00:13:05.440 --> 00:13:09.399
<v Speaker 1>is not understood as just a byproduct or somebody in

175
00:13:09.399 --> 00:13:13.159
<v Speaker 1>the back pages. He occupied a front row position to

176
00:13:13.200 --> 00:13:16.919
<v Speaker 1>the logistics of Epstein's existence for a period spanning nearly

177
00:13:16.960 --> 00:13:20.519
<v Speaker 1>thirty years. He knew the aircraft, the destinations, the properties,

178
00:13:20.600 --> 00:13:23.799
<v Speaker 1>the travel rhythms, and many of the personalities passing through

179
00:13:23.799 --> 00:13:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Epstein's world. Epstein apparently trusted him enough to maintain the

180
00:13:27.919 --> 00:13:31.879
<v Speaker 1>relationship across decades and extend benefits while beyond the fleeting

181
00:13:31.879 --> 00:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>commercial association. Maxwell's prosecution demonstrated that Vasaski understood at least

182
00:13:38.399 --> 00:13:42.759
<v Speaker 1>part of the hierarchy surrounding Epstein. While release correspondence has

183
00:13:42.840 --> 00:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>further illuminated how deeply aviation was integrated into Epstein's day

184
00:13:47.240 --> 00:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to day logistics, whether that knowledge ever across the line

185
00:13:51.080 --> 00:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>into criminal awareness is a question that must be answered

186
00:13:54.320 --> 00:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>with evidence, but there should be no ambiguity whatsoever about

187
00:13:59.159 --> 00:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>whether authorities had reason to investigate the question aggressively when

188
00:14:03.759 --> 00:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a convicted sex offender maintained a sprawling interstate and international

189
00:14:07.960 --> 00:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>operation involving private aircraft, remote properties, and the movement of

190
00:14:12.399 --> 00:14:16.519
<v Speaker 1>young women. The longtime chief pilot was an obvious witness

191
00:14:16.759 --> 00:14:21.919
<v Speaker 1>whose knowledge demanded exhaustive examination. The enduring scandal is not

192
00:14:22.000 --> 00:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that the public can conclusively declare Larry Vsasky a criminal,

193
00:14:26.320 --> 00:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>because the publicly established record does not justify that conclusion.

194
00:14:30.679 --> 00:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>The enduring scandal is that everything we know about Jeffrey Epstein,

195
00:14:34.480 --> 00:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Americans are still left asking what one of his longest

196
00:14:38.519 --> 00:14:42.279
<v Speaker 1>serving and must trust it insiders knew, what investigators learned

197
00:14:42.279 --> 00:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>from them, and why the government has never provided anything

198
00:14:46.440 --> 00:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>close to a satisfactory answer. All the information that goes

199
00:14:52.879 --> 00:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>with this episode can be found in the description box.
