WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.399 --> 00:00:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bedtime Astronomy. Explore the wonders of the cosmos

2
00:00:07.759 --> 00:00:12.279
<v Speaker 1>with our soothing Bedtime Astronomie podcast. Each episode offers a

3
00:00:12.359 --> 00:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>gentle journey through the stars, planets, and beyond, perfect for

4
00:00:16.399 --> 00:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>unwinding after a long day. Let's travel through the mysteries

5
00:00:20.239 --> 00:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of the universe as you drift off into a peaceful

6
00:00:22.480 --> 00:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>slumber under the night sky.

7
00:00:26.960 --> 00:00:30.079
<v Speaker 2>Look at the clock on your wall right now, or

8
00:00:30.320 --> 00:00:32.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, check the time on your phone, or just

9
00:00:32.280 --> 00:00:33.679
<v Speaker 2>glance at the watch on your wrist.

10
00:00:33.759 --> 00:00:35.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, take us up and to really look at it.

11
00:00:35.719 --> 00:00:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Because every single time that secondhand ticks forward or that

12
00:00:41.039 --> 00:00:45.799
<v Speaker 2>digital number rolls over, well, it's lying.

13
00:00:45.560 --> 00:00:48.759
<v Speaker 3>To you, completely lying, and it's it's funny because we

14
00:00:48.840 --> 00:00:53.359
<v Speaker 3>all share this incredibly deep, almost unquestionable intuition about what

15
00:00:53.399 --> 00:00:54.280
<v Speaker 3>those numbers mean.

16
00:00:54.560 --> 00:00:57.119
<v Speaker 2>Right. We go through our entire lives operating on this

17
00:00:57.159 --> 00:01:00.759
<v Speaker 2>assumption that time is a universal river, and you, me,

18
00:01:01.039 --> 00:01:03.240
<v Speaker 2>the listener, we are all just floating in that exact

19
00:01:03.280 --> 00:01:07.480
<v Speaker 2>same river, being carried downstream with the exact same speed exactly.

20
00:01:07.560 --> 00:01:09.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the fundamental assumption of human existence is that

21
00:01:09.920 --> 00:01:12.280
<v Speaker 3>a minute for you sitting right there, right now, is

22
00:01:12.319 --> 00:01:14.719
<v Speaker 3>exactly the same as a minute for someone making coffee

23
00:01:14.719 --> 00:01:17.560
<v Speaker 3>on the other side of the planet, or a minute

24
00:01:17.560 --> 00:01:19.079
<v Speaker 3>for an astronaut orbiting the Earth.

25
00:01:19.319 --> 00:01:20.159
<v Speaker 2>It's just a given.

26
00:01:20.920 --> 00:01:25.200
<v Speaker 3>But that intuition is it's mathematically and observably wrong. The

27
00:01:25.280 --> 00:01:28.159
<v Speaker 3>universal river of time is just a localized illusion.

28
00:01:28.400 --> 00:01:31.799
<v Speaker 2>Wow. Okay, so this isn't some abstract, you know, philosophical wordplay.

29
00:01:32.159 --> 00:01:35.959
<v Speaker 2>You are saying that our literal physical understanding of time,

30
00:01:36.079 --> 00:01:38.480
<v Speaker 2>this masterclock we think is ticking away in the background

31
00:01:38.480 --> 00:01:39.719
<v Speaker 2>of the universe, is just.

32
00:01:39.719 --> 00:01:43.359
<v Speaker 3>Broken, completely shattered. Yeah. I mean the concept of a

33
00:01:43.400 --> 00:01:48.439
<v Speaker 3>single steady master clock governing everything everywhere. It simply does

34
00:01:48.599 --> 00:01:53.159
<v Speaker 3>not exist. Time is local, local, Yeah, it's malleable. It

35
00:01:53.200 --> 00:01:55.640
<v Speaker 3>does not flow at the same rate for all observers.

36
00:01:55.840 --> 00:01:59.840
<v Speaker 3>The actual fabric of time stretches and compresses, depending entirely

37
00:02:00.239 --> 00:02:00.959
<v Speaker 3>on two things.

38
00:02:01.079 --> 00:02:01.959
<v Speaker 2>Okay, what are they?

39
00:02:02.159 --> 00:02:06.040
<v Speaker 3>How fast you're moving through space and how deep you're

40
00:02:06.120 --> 00:02:08.080
<v Speaker 3>resting within a gravitational field.

41
00:02:08.159 --> 00:02:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's unpack this, because this means we are talking

42
00:02:10.719 --> 00:02:14.759
<v Speaker 2>about the literal, structural source code of reality.

43
00:02:14.280 --> 00:02:15.159
<v Speaker 3>Here, we really are.

44
00:02:15.280 --> 00:02:18.199
<v Speaker 2>We're exploring how Albert Einstein realized the universe was playing

45
00:02:18.199 --> 00:02:21.919
<v Speaker 2>this massive trick on us, and how this totally counterintuitive.

46
00:02:21.919 --> 00:02:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Physics is secretly the engine running our modern world right now?

47
00:02:25.400 --> 00:02:27.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and why the whole concept of now, like this

48
00:02:28.039 --> 00:02:31.039
<v Speaker 3>specific moment you and I are experiencing, might actually just

49
00:02:31.080 --> 00:02:33.120
<v Speaker 3>be a psychological hallucination.

50
00:02:32.879 --> 00:02:38.719
<v Speaker 2>Which is terrifying and fascinating because we are talking about cold, hard,

51
00:02:39.240 --> 00:02:40.520
<v Speaker 2>miserable facts today.

52
00:02:40.719 --> 00:02:44.680
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, if you take two identical clocks, right, synchronize them

53
00:02:44.680 --> 00:02:47.560
<v Speaker 3>perfectly so they tick in absolute unison, and then you

54
00:02:47.599 --> 00:02:50.280
<v Speaker 3>just put them on different paths through space time, they

55
00:02:50.319 --> 00:02:51.680
<v Speaker 3>will diverge, like they.

56
00:02:51.520 --> 00:02:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Will physically show different times when you bring them back together.

57
00:02:54.840 --> 00:02:59.199
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and neither clock is broken, neither has a mechanical flaw.

58
00:02:59.280 --> 00:03:02.120
<v Speaker 3>They just traveled through different densities.

59
00:03:01.439 --> 00:03:05.319
<v Speaker 2>Of time, different densities of time. That's such a wild phrase, eh,

60
00:03:05.479 --> 00:03:06.960
<v Speaker 2>And this has been tested.

61
00:03:06.639 --> 00:03:09.879
<v Speaker 3>Right, oh, tested and confirmed by experiment after experiment for

62
00:03:09.960 --> 00:03:13.560
<v Speaker 3>over a century. And honestly, if we didn't mathematically correct

63
00:03:13.599 --> 00:03:16.159
<v Speaker 3>for this warping of time every single second of the day,

64
00:03:16.599 --> 00:03:20.479
<v Speaker 3>our twenty first century infrastructure would literally tear itself apart

65
00:03:20.479 --> 00:03:21.280
<v Speaker 3>before lunchtime.

66
00:03:21.560 --> 00:03:24.199
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So to really grasp why that clock on the

67
00:03:24.199 --> 00:03:27.199
<v Speaker 2>wall is feeding us a localized fiction, we actually have

68
00:03:27.280 --> 00:03:29.240
<v Speaker 2>to stop looking at time. Right, we have to look

69
00:03:29.280 --> 00:03:29.639
<v Speaker 2>at light.

70
00:03:29.919 --> 00:03:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because to understand how time bends, you have to

71
00:03:32.639 --> 00:03:35.280
<v Speaker 3>establish the one thing in the entire universe that refuses

72
00:03:35.319 --> 00:03:38.439
<v Speaker 3>to bend, the speed of light exactly. So to trace

73
00:03:38.479 --> 00:03:41.039
<v Speaker 3>that realization, we really need to go back to nineteen

74
00:03:41.080 --> 00:03:44.879
<v Speaker 3>oh five, to the first of Albert Einstein's two big breakthroughs.

75
00:03:44.400 --> 00:03:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Write his paper on special relativity.

76
00:03:46.360 --> 00:03:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, at the time, physics was still living in the

77
00:03:49.400 --> 00:03:53.639
<v Speaker 3>house Isaac Newton built. Newtonian physics assumes space is just

78
00:03:53.680 --> 00:03:57.879
<v Speaker 3>an empty static stage and time is the unchangeable clock

79
00:03:57.960 --> 00:03:59.599
<v Speaker 3>on the wall of that stage.

80
00:04:00.000 --> 00:04:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Einstein basically took a sledgehammer to that.

81
00:04:02.400 --> 00:04:06.039
<v Speaker 3>He really did. He looked at objects moving at constant velocities,

82
00:04:06.080 --> 00:04:09.719
<v Speaker 3>and he built his entire theory on a single, uncompromising rule.

83
00:04:10.479 --> 00:04:12.639
<v Speaker 3>The speed of light in a vacuum is exactly the

84
00:04:12.719 --> 00:04:15.280
<v Speaker 3>same for all observers, no matter how fast the light

85
00:04:15.319 --> 00:04:16.839
<v Speaker 3>source or the observer is moving.

86
00:04:16.959 --> 00:04:19.079
<v Speaker 2>Okay, on the surface, if you don't know the physics,

87
00:04:19.120 --> 00:04:22.160
<v Speaker 2>that sounds kind of mundane. Light goes fast, and it

88
00:04:22.279 --> 00:04:23.639
<v Speaker 2>always goes the same amount of fast.

89
00:04:23.720 --> 00:04:25.439
<v Speaker 3>Right, it doesn't sound revolutionary, But.

90
00:04:25.480 --> 00:04:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's map that onto how everyday objects work, because that's

91
00:04:29.160 --> 00:04:32.959
<v Speaker 2>where the absolute absurdity of Einstein's rule kicks him. Think

92
00:04:32.959 --> 00:04:35.759
<v Speaker 2>about a highway. If I'm driving down the highway at

93
00:04:35.759 --> 00:04:38.680
<v Speaker 2>sixteen miles an hour and another car passes me doing

94
00:04:38.759 --> 00:04:42.240
<v Speaker 2>seventy my perspective from the driver's seat is that the

95
00:04:42.240 --> 00:04:44.240
<v Speaker 2>passing car is only creeping ahead of me at ten

96
00:04:44.279 --> 00:04:44.759
<v Speaker 2>miles an.

97
00:04:44.639 --> 00:04:48.079
<v Speaker 3>Hour, exactly because velocities are additive and subtractive.

98
00:04:48.199 --> 00:04:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Right. If I throw a baseball at one hundred miles

99
00:04:50.360 --> 00:04:51.879
<v Speaker 2>an hour out the front of a train that's moving

100
00:04:51.920 --> 00:04:54.240
<v Speaker 2>at one hundred miles an hour, someone standing on the

101
00:04:54.279 --> 00:04:57.839
<v Speaker 2>platform sees that baseball traveling at two hundred miles an hour.

102
00:04:58.079 --> 00:04:59.519
<v Speaker 2>That makes logical sense.

103
00:04:59.319 --> 00:05:03.199
<v Speaker 3>To us, because the human brain relies on Galilean relativity,

104
00:05:03.319 --> 00:05:07.399
<v Speaker 3>that simple addition of speeds. But light completely refuses to

105
00:05:07.439 --> 00:05:08.319
<v Speaker 3>play by that rule.

106
00:05:08.560 --> 00:05:10.600
<v Speaker 2>So how does light behave in that scenario.

107
00:05:11.079 --> 00:05:15.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, imagine you're flying in a hyperadvanced spaceship at ninety

108
00:05:15.519 --> 00:05:16.720
<v Speaker 3>nine percent of the speed of light.

109
00:05:16.839 --> 00:05:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, moving incredibly fast.

110
00:05:18.839 --> 00:05:21.560
<v Speaker 3>Right, and you shine a flashlight at the front window.

111
00:05:21.879 --> 00:05:24.480
<v Speaker 3>That beam of light does not travel at one hundred

112
00:05:24.480 --> 00:05:26.480
<v Speaker 3>and ninety nine percent of the speed of light relative

113
00:05:26.519 --> 00:05:27.600
<v Speaker 3>to someone watching.

114
00:05:27.319 --> 00:05:29.959
<v Speaker 2>You, because there's a speed limit exactly.

115
00:05:30.319 --> 00:05:32.879
<v Speaker 3>But it also doesn't just pull away from your ship

116
00:05:32.879 --> 00:05:35.120
<v Speaker 3>at a mere one percent of the speed of light,

117
00:05:35.160 --> 00:05:37.399
<v Speaker 3>which is what the highway logic would suggest, right.

118
00:05:37.480 --> 00:05:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Seventy minus sixty is ten, so light speed minus ninety

119
00:05:41.079 --> 00:05:42.439
<v Speaker 2>nine percent should be one percent.

120
00:05:42.519 --> 00:05:45.839
<v Speaker 3>But it isn't. From your perspective inside the ship, that

121
00:05:45.879 --> 00:05:48.680
<v Speaker 3>beam pulls away from you at exactly the full speed

122
00:05:48.680 --> 00:05:51.399
<v Speaker 3>of light. Wait, and from the perspective of someone standing

123
00:05:51.439 --> 00:05:54.560
<v Speaker 3>still on a planet watching you fly by, that exact

124
00:05:54.560 --> 00:05:57.600
<v Speaker 3>same beam of light is also moving at exactly the

125
00:05:57.639 --> 00:05:58.279
<v Speaker 3>speed of light.

126
00:05:58.480 --> 00:06:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so this is the exact moment the universe backs

127
00:06:01.240 --> 00:06:05.120
<v Speaker 2>us into a mathematical corner. You have two people moving

128
00:06:05.120 --> 00:06:09.160
<v Speaker 2>at vastly different speeds, observing the exact same beam of light,

129
00:06:09.279 --> 00:06:11.639
<v Speaker 2>and they both measure it moving at the exact same

130
00:06:11.680 --> 00:06:13.360
<v Speaker 2>speed relatives to themselves.

131
00:06:13.439 --> 00:06:14.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, which should be impossible.

132
00:06:15.279 --> 00:06:19.399
<v Speaker 2>Right. To make that true, the universe has to cheat.

133
00:06:19.839 --> 00:06:21.879
<v Speaker 2>It has to alter something else to keep the speed

134
00:06:21.879 --> 00:06:25.279
<v Speaker 2>of light constant. Let's walk through the light clock thought experiment,

135
00:06:25.279 --> 00:06:28.639
<v Speaker 2>because visualizing the geometry here is really what finally made

136
00:06:28.639 --> 00:06:29.319
<v Speaker 2>this click for me.

137
00:06:29.560 --> 00:06:32.160
<v Speaker 3>The light clock is perfect for this. It strips away

138
00:06:32.160 --> 00:06:35.839
<v Speaker 3>all the mechanical complications, you know, gears and springs. Just

139
00:06:35.959 --> 00:06:39.000
<v Speaker 3>imagine the simplest possible timekeeping device.

140
00:06:39.120 --> 00:06:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm fixturing it.

141
00:06:40.240 --> 00:06:44.360
<v Speaker 3>You have two highly polished mirrors facing each other, one

142
00:06:44.399 --> 00:06:46.519
<v Speaker 3>mounted on the floor and one mounted on the ceiling

143
00:06:46.519 --> 00:06:49.240
<v Speaker 3>directly above it, and a single pulse of light is

144
00:06:49.360 --> 00:06:52.439
<v Speaker 3>trapped between them, just bouncing endlessly up and down.

145
00:06:52.600 --> 00:06:55.079
<v Speaker 2>Got it. And we define one tick of this clock

146
00:06:55.560 --> 00:06:57.879
<v Speaker 2>as the time it takes for the light pulse to

147
00:06:58.000 --> 00:07:00.800
<v Speaker 2>leave the bottom mirror, hit the top mirror, and bounce.

148
00:07:00.560 --> 00:07:02.879
<v Speaker 3>Back down exactly, up and down, tick, up and down.

149
00:07:02.959 --> 00:07:05.639
<v Speaker 2>Tick. Okay. Now, let's take this light clock and mount

150
00:07:05.720 --> 00:07:08.759
<v Speaker 2>it inside a transparent spaceship, and that spaceship is going

151
00:07:08.800 --> 00:07:11.759
<v Speaker 2>to fly past me at a massive velocid, let's say,

152
00:07:11.759 --> 00:07:14.639
<v Speaker 2>half the speed of light. I'm standing perfectly still on

153
00:07:14.720 --> 00:07:17.800
<v Speaker 2>an asteroid watching the ship zoom by from left to right.

154
00:07:18.000 --> 00:07:21.680
<v Speaker 3>So let's isolate the perspectives here, starting with the astronaut

155
00:07:21.720 --> 00:07:25.279
<v Speaker 3>inside the spaceship. From their point of view, they're perfectly

156
00:07:25.319 --> 00:07:29.120
<v Speaker 3>stationary inside their cabin. The floor is below them, the

157
00:07:29.199 --> 00:07:32.399
<v Speaker 3>ceiling is above them. They watch the light clock, and

158
00:07:32.439 --> 00:07:35.240
<v Speaker 3>they see the pulse of light traveling perfectly straight up

159
00:07:35.319 --> 00:07:37.000
<v Speaker 3>and perfectly straight down, So.

160
00:07:37.040 --> 00:07:39.680
<v Speaker 2>The distance the light travels for one tick is just

161
00:07:39.759 --> 00:07:41.279
<v Speaker 2>twice the height of the cabin, right.

162
00:07:41.680 --> 00:07:45.879
<v Speaker 3>Simple. But your perspective standing outside watching the ship fly

163
00:07:46.040 --> 00:07:47.920
<v Speaker 3>past is entirely.

164
00:07:47.519 --> 00:07:49.279
<v Speaker 2>Different because the ship is moving.

165
00:07:49.560 --> 00:07:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Yes, when the light pulse leaves the bottom mirror, the

166
00:07:53.000 --> 00:07:55.800
<v Speaker 3>ship is at let's say position A, But by the

167
00:07:55.839 --> 00:07:58.000
<v Speaker 3>time the light travels up to hit the ceiling mirror,

168
00:07:58.319 --> 00:08:01.079
<v Speaker 3>the entire ship has moved forward to position.

169
00:08:00.800 --> 00:08:03.720
<v Speaker 2>B oh right. So from my vantage point outside, the

170
00:08:03.800 --> 00:08:06.399
<v Speaker 2>light pulse didn't go straight up. It had to travel

171
00:08:06.480 --> 00:08:09.560
<v Speaker 2>diagonally forward and upward to catch the moving ceiling.

172
00:08:09.279 --> 00:08:12.600
<v Speaker 3>Mirror exactly, and the geometry continues on the return trip.

173
00:08:13.000 --> 00:08:15.000
<v Speaker 3>By the time the light bounces off the ceiling and

174
00:08:15.040 --> 00:08:17.639
<v Speaker 3>returns to the floor mirror, the ship has moved even

175
00:08:17.800 --> 00:08:21.240
<v Speaker 3>further forward to position C, so the light has.

176
00:08:21.120 --> 00:08:23.199
<v Speaker 2>To travel diagonally forward and downward.

177
00:08:23.560 --> 00:08:27.560
<v Speaker 3>You got it. From your stationary perspective outside the ship,

178
00:08:28.000 --> 00:08:30.720
<v Speaker 3>the light pulse isn't moving in a vertical line at all.

179
00:08:31.040 --> 00:08:34.519
<v Speaker 3>It's tracing a zigzag pattern, a series of long diagonomal

180
00:08:34.600 --> 00:08:35.519
<v Speaker 3>lines through space.

181
00:08:35.720 --> 00:08:39.159
<v Speaker 2>And here's where the trap closes on us. Because basic

182
00:08:39.200 --> 00:08:42.960
<v Speaker 2>pythagore and geometry tells us that a diagonal line connecting

183
00:08:42.960 --> 00:08:46.840
<v Speaker 2>two horizontal points is always physically longer than a straight

184
00:08:46.919 --> 00:08:48.039
<v Speaker 2>vertical line between them.

185
00:08:48.120 --> 00:08:49.600
<v Speaker 3>It has to be so.

186
00:08:49.679 --> 00:08:52.159
<v Speaker 2>The path the light took from my perspective outside the

187
00:08:52.200 --> 00:08:55.720
<v Speaker 2>ship is a definitively longer distance than the path it

188
00:08:55.720 --> 00:08:58.200
<v Speaker 2>took from the astronaut's perspective inside the ship.

189
00:08:58.360 --> 00:09:01.759
<v Speaker 3>And this is where we apply einstein unbreakable rule. And

190
00:09:01.840 --> 00:09:05.840
<v Speaker 3>the equation for speed is universally simple. Right. Speed equals

191
00:09:05.879 --> 00:09:09.159
<v Speaker 3>distance divided by time. Right, we've established that the distance

192
00:09:09.200 --> 00:09:11.840
<v Speaker 3>the light traveled from your perspective is greater than the

193
00:09:11.840 --> 00:09:15.000
<v Speaker 3>distance it traveled from the astronaut's perspective, but the speed

194
00:09:15.039 --> 00:09:17.879
<v Speaker 3>of the light cannot change. It must be identical for

195
00:09:17.960 --> 00:09:18.399
<v Speaker 3>both of you.

196
00:09:18.799 --> 00:09:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Right, So the distance is a larger number for me,

197
00:09:21.480 --> 00:09:24.240
<v Speaker 2>and the speed is locked as a constant. The math

198
00:09:24.480 --> 00:09:27.039
<v Speaker 2>physically forces the time to be a larger number. Two.

199
00:09:27.279 --> 00:09:29.799
<v Speaker 2>The only way to balance the equation is if the

200
00:09:29.840 --> 00:09:32.759
<v Speaker 2>time it took for the clock to tick was literally

201
00:09:32.840 --> 00:09:34.840
<v Speaker 2>longer for me than it was for the astronaut.

202
00:09:34.879 --> 00:09:38.840
<v Speaker 3>The inescapable mathematical reality is that the moving clock ticks

203
00:09:38.960 --> 00:09:43.120
<v Speaker 3>more slowly than the stationary one from your perspective. Looking

204
00:09:43.159 --> 00:09:47.000
<v Speaker 3>into that moving ship. Time itself is dragging. The physical

205
00:09:47.039 --> 00:09:50.279
<v Speaker 3>progression of reality has slowed down to compensate for the

206
00:09:50.399 --> 00:09:52.919
<v Speaker 3>longer distance the light had to travel just.

207
00:09:52.879 --> 00:09:55.679
<v Speaker 2>To ensure the speed of light remains perfectly constant.

208
00:09:55.840 --> 00:09:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes, this is special relativistic time dilation.

209
00:09:58.919 --> 00:10:00.919
<v Speaker 2>You know. I always try to find the trick here

210
00:10:01.480 --> 00:10:04.039
<v Speaker 2>to say, well, it's just an optical illusion. The light

211
00:10:04.159 --> 00:10:06.200
<v Speaker 2>is just taking longer to reach my eyeballs because the

212
00:10:06.240 --> 00:10:09.600
<v Speaker 2>ship is moving away. But that's not what's happening, is it.

213
00:10:09.799 --> 00:10:13.600
<v Speaker 3>No, not at all. The actual biological aging of the astronaut,

214
00:10:13.799 --> 00:10:16.320
<v Speaker 3>the decay of atoms in the ship's hull, the thoughts

215
00:10:16.360 --> 00:10:20.480
<v Speaker 3>firing in the astronaut's brain, every single localized physical process

216
00:10:20.600 --> 00:10:23.039
<v Speaker 3>is happening in slow motion relative to the rest of

217
00:10:23.080 --> 00:10:23.639
<v Speaker 3>the universe.

218
00:10:23.799 --> 00:10:27.320
<v Speaker 2>It's a genuine asymmetry in the fundamental rate at which

219
00:10:27.360 --> 00:10:31.039
<v Speaker 2>reality unfolds. It's not an artifact of observation, right.

220
00:10:31.240 --> 00:10:34.720
<v Speaker 3>Observers in different states of uniformation experience different intervals of

221
00:10:34.759 --> 00:10:36.360
<v Speaker 3>time between the exact sam events.

222
00:10:36.519 --> 00:10:39.840
<v Speaker 2>But the immediate counter argument anyone would have is, Okay,

223
00:10:40.039 --> 00:10:43.080
<v Speaker 2>if motion slows down time, why don't I experience a

224
00:10:43.120 --> 00:10:46.200
<v Speaker 2>time warp when I merge onto the interstate. Why don't

225
00:10:46.200 --> 00:10:49.960
<v Speaker 2>my watch in my car's dashboard clock stay perfectly syncd Well.

226
00:10:50.000 --> 00:10:52.559
<v Speaker 3>The physics is governed by a mathematical term called the

227
00:10:52.639 --> 00:10:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Lorentz factor, and this factor dictates exactly how much time dilates,

228
00:10:56.360 --> 00:10:59.399
<v Speaker 3>how much length contracts, and how much mass increases as

229
00:10:59.440 --> 00:11:01.519
<v Speaker 3>an object's velocity approaches the speed of light.

230
00:11:02.039 --> 00:11:03.279
<v Speaker 2>Okay, and the key.

231
00:11:03.159 --> 00:11:06.480
<v Speaker 3>To understanding why our daily lives feel strictly Newtonian is

232
00:11:06.519 --> 00:11:09.639
<v Speaker 3>the shape of that Lorentz curve. At the relatively sluggish

233
00:11:09.679 --> 00:11:13.399
<v Speaker 3>speeds humans travel at, walking, driving a car, even launching

234
00:11:13.399 --> 00:11:16.320
<v Speaker 3>a rocket into orbit, the velocity is such a tiny

235
00:11:16.360 --> 00:11:18.919
<v Speaker 3>fraction of the speed of light that the Lorentz factor

236
00:11:18.919 --> 00:11:20.879
<v Speaker 3>remains incredibly close to one.

237
00:11:20.759 --> 00:11:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Meaning the time dilation multiplier is basically like one point

238
00:11:24.360 --> 00:11:27.799
<v Speaker 2>zero zero zero zero zero zero zero one. It's so

239
00:11:27.919 --> 00:11:30.960
<v Speaker 2>infinitesimally small that it completely falls beneath the threshold of

240
00:11:31.000 --> 00:11:31.720
<v Speaker 2>human perception.

241
00:11:32.159 --> 00:11:34.679
<v Speaker 3>Exactly to put a number on it, If you board

242
00:11:34.679 --> 00:11:37.360
<v Speaker 3>a commercial jetliner and fly at a cruising speed of

243
00:11:37.440 --> 00:11:41.559
<v Speaker 3>roughly one thousand kilometers per hour, you are absolutely experiencing

244
00:11:41.639 --> 00:11:46.000
<v Speaker 3>special relativistic time dilation. I am yes, but the amount

245
00:11:46.039 --> 00:11:48.679
<v Speaker 3>your local time slows down compared to someone on the

246
00:11:48.679 --> 00:11:52.039
<v Speaker 3>ground is measured in a few nanoseconds per hour.

247
00:11:52.159 --> 00:11:54.759
<v Speaker 2>A nanosecond being one billionth of a second.

248
00:11:54.840 --> 00:11:58.039
<v Speaker 3>Right, So the biological difference is practically non existent to

249
00:11:58.080 --> 00:11:58.720
<v Speaker 3>our senses.

250
00:11:58.799 --> 00:12:01.759
<v Speaker 2>But the Lorenz factor isn't linear, is it. It's an asymptote.

251
00:12:02.799 --> 00:12:06.080
<v Speaker 2>When we start pushing the velocity higher, the math stops

252
00:12:06.120 --> 00:12:10.000
<v Speaker 2>being a rounding air and becomes violently dramatic. Let's say

253
00:12:10.039 --> 00:12:13.120
<v Speaker 2>we finally invent a propulsion drive. They can push a

254
00:12:13.159 --> 00:12:15.320
<v Speaker 2>spacecraft to ninety percent of the speed of light.

255
00:12:15.519 --> 00:12:17.559
<v Speaker 3>At ninety percent of the speed of light, the Lorentz

256
00:12:17.600 --> 00:12:20.639
<v Speaker 3>curve spikes sharply. Time for the crew on that ship

257
00:12:20.679 --> 00:12:22.519
<v Speaker 3>would run at less than half the rate of a

258
00:12:22.519 --> 00:12:23.960
<v Speaker 3>stationary observer on Earth.

259
00:12:24.039 --> 00:12:26.559
<v Speaker 2>So for every hour that ticks by on the ship's.

260
00:12:26.240 --> 00:12:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Clock, more than two hours pass for mission control back home.

261
00:12:29.639 --> 00:12:32.399
<v Speaker 2>Wow, Let's push the engines to ninety nine percent of

262
00:12:32.399 --> 00:12:33.039
<v Speaker 2>the speed of light.

263
00:12:33.279 --> 00:12:37.240
<v Speaker 3>At ninety nine percent, the dilation becomes severe. Time on

264
00:12:37.279 --> 00:12:40.080
<v Speaker 3>the ship runs at roughly one seventh the normal rate.

265
00:12:40.600 --> 00:12:43.759
<v Speaker 3>If the crew spends a single year traveling at that speed,

266
00:12:43.919 --> 00:12:45.799
<v Speaker 3>seven years will have evaporated on Earth.

267
00:12:45.960 --> 00:12:47.840
<v Speaker 2>What about ninety nine point nine percent.

268
00:12:47.960 --> 00:12:51.000
<v Speaker 3>The closer you shave the margin to the absolute speed limit,

269
00:12:51.399 --> 00:12:55.240
<v Speaker 3>the more extreme the temporal distortion gets. At ninety nine

270
00:12:55.279 --> 00:12:58.200
<v Speaker 3>point nine percent of the speed of light, time slows

271
00:12:58.240 --> 00:13:01.200
<v Speaker 3>to about one twenty second of the stationary rate. The

272
00:13:01.240 --> 00:13:04.879
<v Speaker 3>denominator in the Lorenz equation shrinks towards zero, which means

273
00:13:04.919 --> 00:13:07.519
<v Speaker 3>the time dilation factor explodes toward infinity.

274
00:13:07.720 --> 00:13:10.039
<v Speaker 2>And if we somehow breach the limit, if we hit

275
00:13:10.080 --> 00:13:12.320
<v Speaker 2>exactly one hundred percent of the speed of light, if.

276
00:13:12.200 --> 00:13:15.000
<v Speaker 3>An object with mass could somehow reach the exact speed

277
00:13:15.039 --> 00:13:18.159
<v Speaker 3>of light, the mathematics dictate that time would stop entirely,

278
00:13:18.480 --> 00:13:21.759
<v Speaker 3>just freeze. The internal clock of that object would freeze.

279
00:13:21.799 --> 00:13:23.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, think about a photon. A photon is a

280
00:13:23.759 --> 00:13:26.639
<v Speaker 3>particle of light, so it naturally travels at the speed

281
00:13:26.639 --> 00:13:29.080
<v Speaker 3>of light. It essentially experiences no time.

282
00:13:29.159 --> 00:13:32.399
<v Speaker 2>Wait, really no time at all none.

283
00:13:32.440 --> 00:13:35.720
<v Speaker 3>From a photon's perspective, the moment it is emitted from

284
00:13:35.720 --> 00:13:38.840
<v Speaker 3>a star and the moment it strikes your retina millions

285
00:13:38.840 --> 00:13:40.960
<v Speaker 3>of years later happens simultaneously.

286
00:13:41.120 --> 00:13:42.159
<v Speaker 2>That is mind blowing.

287
00:13:42.360 --> 00:13:46.799
<v Speaker 3>But for anything with mass, a human, a spaceship, even

288
00:13:46.840 --> 00:13:50.519
<v Speaker 3>a single proton, reaching the speed of light is physically impossible.

289
00:13:51.240 --> 00:13:55.080
<v Speaker 3>As the Lorentz factor approaches infinity, the energy required to

290
00:13:55.120 --> 00:13:59.679
<v Speaker 3>accelerate the object also approaches infinity. The universe forbids mass

291
00:13:59.720 --> 00:14:01.039
<v Speaker 3>from reaching the speed limit.

292
00:14:01.240 --> 00:14:04.279
<v Speaker 2>This all sounds like a brilliant piece of chalkpord theoretical physics.

293
00:14:05.120 --> 00:14:07.399
<v Speaker 2>But what blows my mind is that physicists didn't just

294
00:14:07.480 --> 00:14:11.200
<v Speaker 2>lead this as a mathematical curiosity. They actually found ways

295
00:14:11.240 --> 00:14:13.480
<v Speaker 2>to physically prove it. I mean, I know there was

296
00:14:13.480 --> 00:14:16.960
<v Speaker 2>an experiment in the early nineteen seventies, the halfle keating experiment, Yes,

297
00:14:17.080 --> 00:14:20.600
<v Speaker 2>a classic, where they supposedly put atomic clocks on commercial airplanes.

298
00:14:20.919 --> 00:14:22.879
<v Speaker 2>But my first thought when I read about that was,

299
00:14:23.000 --> 00:14:25.840
<v Speaker 2>how could a normal passenger plane flying at maybe six

300
00:14:25.919 --> 00:14:28.639
<v Speaker 2>hundred miles an hour possibly go fast enough to measure

301
00:14:28.639 --> 00:14:30.960
<v Speaker 2>in effect that requires the speed of light to become obvious.

302
00:14:31.039 --> 00:14:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Weren't they just flying around the world on standard pan

303
00:14:33.279 --> 00:14:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Am flights.

304
00:14:34.200 --> 00:14:37.759
<v Speaker 3>Your right to be skeptical, because, as we established, passenger

305
00:14:37.840 --> 00:14:41.279
<v Speaker 3>jets are crawling compared to the speed of light. The

306
00:14:41.360 --> 00:14:45.600
<v Speaker 3>time dilation at those speeds is incredibly minuscule. But the

307
00:14:45.720 --> 00:14:48.840
<v Speaker 3>brilliance of the hefel keating experiment wasn't in the speed

308
00:14:48.879 --> 00:14:49.399
<v Speaker 3>of the planes.

309
00:14:49.559 --> 00:14:50.279
<v Speaker 2>What was it?

310
00:14:50.279 --> 00:14:53.799
<v Speaker 3>It was in the sheer, unfathomable precision of the instruments.

311
00:14:54.559 --> 00:14:58.399
<v Speaker 3>In nineteen seventy one, Joseph Heffel and Richard Keating took

312
00:14:58.600 --> 00:15:02.879
<v Speaker 3>four caesium beam atomic clocks. These are devices that measure

313
00:15:02.919 --> 00:15:07.159
<v Speaker 3>time by counting the exact microwave resonances of caesium atoms.

314
00:15:07.600 --> 00:15:10.360
<v Speaker 3>They're so precise they might lose or gain a single

315
00:15:10.399 --> 00:15:12.600
<v Speaker 3>second over tens of millions of years.

316
00:15:12.679 --> 00:15:15.559
<v Speaker 2>So they took these ultra sensitive instruments literally, bought them

317
00:15:15.600 --> 00:15:18.799
<v Speaker 2>passenger tickets and strapped them into the seats of commercial airliners.

318
00:15:19.000 --> 00:15:21.960
<v Speaker 3>Literally, they flew one set of clocks eastward around the

319
00:15:21.960 --> 00:15:25.240
<v Speaker 3>world and another set westward around the world. And meanwhile

320
00:15:25.279 --> 00:15:28.919
<v Speaker 3>they kept a reference set of identical atomic clocks, completely

321
00:15:28.960 --> 00:15:31.720
<v Speaker 3>stationary at the United States Naval Observatory.

322
00:15:31.960 --> 00:15:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so the goal was to see if the flying clocks,

323
00:15:34.399 --> 00:15:38.080
<v Speaker 2>heavy experienced the velocity of the airplanes, would physically disagree

324
00:15:38.080 --> 00:15:40.639
<v Speaker 2>with the stationary clocks when they got back. But why

325
00:15:40.679 --> 00:15:44.440
<v Speaker 2>eastward and westward? Does the direction matter when you're just

326
00:15:44.480 --> 00:15:45.240
<v Speaker 2>measuring speed?

327
00:15:45.360 --> 00:15:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Oh, it matters immensely because the Earth itself is spinning

328
00:15:48.799 --> 00:15:52.120
<v Speaker 3>the stationary clocks. The observatory are already moving because the

329
00:15:52.159 --> 00:15:55.320
<v Speaker 3>surface of the Earth is rotating. Right when the plane

330
00:15:55.320 --> 00:15:59.039
<v Speaker 3>flew eastward in the same direction as the Earth's rotation,

331
00:15:59.679 --> 00:16:02.559
<v Speaker 3>it's velocity added to the rotational speed of the Earth.

332
00:16:03.120 --> 00:16:05.639
<v Speaker 3>It was moving faster relative to the center of the

333
00:16:05.679 --> 00:16:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Earth than the stationary clocks. Therefore, special relativity predicted the

334
00:16:10.120 --> 00:16:14.360
<v Speaker 3>eastward clocks should run significantly slower and lose time.

335
00:16:14.360 --> 00:16:17.039
<v Speaker 2>And the westward flight was flying against the rotation of

336
00:16:17.080 --> 00:16:21.440
<v Speaker 2>the Earth, essentially subtracting from that rotational speed, so relative

337
00:16:21.480 --> 00:16:23.600
<v Speaker 2>to the center of the Earth, the westward plane was

338
00:16:23.600 --> 00:16:26.320
<v Speaker 2>actually moving slower than the stationary observatory on.

339
00:16:26.320 --> 00:16:31.000
<v Speaker 3>The ground exactly. The mathematics predicted a very specific Chiny

340
00:16:31.039 --> 00:16:35.080
<v Speaker 3>discrepancy for both journeys, and when Hafili and Keating brought

341
00:16:35.080 --> 00:16:37.519
<v Speaker 3>the flying clocks back into the lab and compared the

342
00:16:37.559 --> 00:16:41.039
<v Speaker 3>readouts to the reference clocks, the numbers did not match.

343
00:16:41.519 --> 00:16:44.919
<v Speaker 3>The eastward clocks had lost time, the westward clocks had

344
00:16:44.919 --> 00:16:47.720
<v Speaker 3>gained time. The physical time displayed on the instruments was

345
00:16:47.759 --> 00:16:52.360
<v Speaker 3>fundamentally different, and the discrepancy perfectly matched the nanosecond calculations

346
00:16:52.639 --> 00:16:55.440
<v Speaker 3>derived from Einstein's equations fifty years prior.

347
00:16:55.399 --> 00:16:58.600
<v Speaker 2>They physically carried a slice of reality into a different

348
00:16:58.639 --> 00:17:02.600
<v Speaker 2>temporal flow it'st deep there, and brought it back. That

349
00:17:02.720 --> 00:17:06.440
<v Speaker 2>is profound, It's incredible. But there's another real world proof

350
00:17:06.440 --> 00:17:09.640
<v Speaker 2>of special relativity that is even more dramatic because it

351
00:17:09.640 --> 00:17:13.119
<v Speaker 2>doesn't require man made atomic clocks. Right. It happens naturally

352
00:17:13.599 --> 00:17:16.559
<v Speaker 2>millions of times every single second right above our heads

353
00:17:16.599 --> 00:17:19.359
<v Speaker 2>in the atmosphere. Uh the muons survival test.

354
00:17:19.559 --> 00:17:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Ah. Yes, the behavior of muons is a continuous, naturally

355
00:17:24.039 --> 00:17:28.559
<v Speaker 3>occurring demonstration of time dilation. Particle physicists rely on it daily.

356
00:17:28.960 --> 00:17:30.880
<v Speaker 3>To understand it, we have to look at the upper

357
00:17:30.880 --> 00:17:33.920
<v Speaker 3>limits of the Earth's atmosphere. Deep space is filled with

358
00:17:34.039 --> 00:17:38.160
<v Speaker 3>high energy cosmic rays, mostly protons, traveling at immense speeds.

359
00:17:38.480 --> 00:17:42.160
<v Speaker 3>When these cosmic rays slam into the molecules of oxygen

360
00:17:42.200 --> 00:17:46.400
<v Speaker 3>and nitrogen in our upper atmosphere, the violent collision creates

361
00:17:46.400 --> 00:17:50.279
<v Speaker 3>a shower of secondary sub atomic particles, and among these

362
00:17:50.319 --> 00:17:51.759
<v Speaker 3>are particles called muons.

363
00:17:52.079 --> 00:17:54.799
<v Speaker 2>So these muons are born high up in the atmosphere,

364
00:17:54.839 --> 00:17:57.920
<v Speaker 2>maybe ten miles above the surface, and the momentum from

365
00:17:57.960 --> 00:18:01.880
<v Speaker 2>the collision sends them hurtling downward toward the ground at

366
00:18:01.960 --> 00:18:04.319
<v Speaker 2>velocities incredibly close to the speed of light.

367
00:18:04.440 --> 00:18:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Correct, But the muon has a fatal flaw. It's a

368
00:18:08.079 --> 00:18:11.720
<v Speaker 3>highly unstable particle. Once a muon is created, it has

369
00:18:11.759 --> 00:18:15.839
<v Speaker 3>an incredibly short half life of roughly two point two microseconds.

370
00:18:15.880 --> 00:18:17.759
<v Speaker 2>That's two point two millions of a second.

371
00:18:17.839 --> 00:18:21.400
<v Speaker 3>Right after that microscypic flicker of time, it decays into

372
00:18:21.480 --> 00:18:24.759
<v Speaker 3>an electron and a couple of neutrinos. It ceases to

373
00:18:24.799 --> 00:18:25.839
<v Speaker 3>exist as a muon.

374
00:18:26.160 --> 00:18:28.279
<v Speaker 2>Wait, let's look at the mat there. If a muon

375
00:18:28.359 --> 00:18:30.799
<v Speaker 2>only lives for two millions of a second, it shouldn't

376
00:18:30.799 --> 00:18:32.799
<v Speaker 2>be able to survive the trip to the ground, even

377
00:18:32.799 --> 00:18:34.880
<v Speaker 2>if it's traveling at ninety nine point nine percent of

378
00:18:34.880 --> 00:18:37.720
<v Speaker 2>the speed of light. The atmosphere is miles thick. Light

379
00:18:37.759 --> 00:18:41.359
<v Speaker 2>itself takes significantly longer than two microseconds to travel ten

380
00:18:41.440 --> 00:18:44.680
<v Speaker 2>miles it does. If time is a universal constant ticking

381
00:18:44.680 --> 00:18:48.200
<v Speaker 2>away at the same rate for everything, every single muon

382
00:18:48.279 --> 00:18:51.559
<v Speaker 2>ever created should die miles up in the sky. Yet

383
00:18:51.599 --> 00:18:53.839
<v Speaker 2>we have detectors on the surface of the Earth and

384
00:18:53.920 --> 00:18:57.599
<v Speaker 2>even deep underground in mines that are constantly being pinged

385
00:18:57.640 --> 00:19:00.480
<v Speaker 2>by intact muons. How is that part possible?

386
00:19:00.720 --> 00:19:03.640
<v Speaker 3>This is the exact paradox that makes time dilation an

387
00:19:03.799 --> 00:19:08.559
<v Speaker 3>undeniable physical reality. If the universe operated on Newtonian time,

388
00:19:08.720 --> 00:19:11.359
<v Speaker 3>the probability of a muon reaching the surface would be

389
00:19:11.440 --> 00:19:14.680
<v Speaker 3>functionally zero. But we detect massive.

390
00:19:14.319 --> 00:19:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Swarms of them, So how do they make it.

391
00:19:16.839 --> 00:19:18.640
<v Speaker 3>To resolve the contradiction, you have to look at the

392
00:19:18.680 --> 00:19:22.359
<v Speaker 3>journey from two completely different reference frames. Let's start from

393
00:19:22.400 --> 00:19:25.720
<v Speaker 3>our perspective standing on the Earth next to our muon detector.

394
00:19:26.160 --> 00:19:29.599
<v Speaker 2>Okay, from my perspective, I'm stationary, and the subatomic particle

395
00:19:29.640 --> 00:19:32.599
<v Speaker 2>is rocketing toward me at ninety nine point nine percent

396
00:19:32.599 --> 00:19:35.400
<v Speaker 2>of the speed of light. Because it's moving so incredibly

397
00:19:35.440 --> 00:19:38.359
<v Speaker 2>fast relative to my frame of reference, the Lorenz factor

398
00:19:38.440 --> 00:19:42.319
<v Speaker 2>is huge. Special relativity dictates that the muon's internal clock,

399
00:19:42.640 --> 00:19:45.200
<v Speaker 2>the rate at which it experiences its own decay process,

400
00:19:45.640 --> 00:19:47.240
<v Speaker 2>must be running exceptionally slowly.

401
00:19:47.480 --> 00:19:50.480
<v Speaker 3>Exactly while the clocks in our laboratory are ticking away

402
00:19:50.519 --> 00:19:54.400
<v Speaker 3>at a normal speed, the muon's biological clock, so to speak,

403
00:19:54.440 --> 00:19:58.759
<v Speaker 3>is barely advancing. From our perspective, that fleeting two microsecond

404
00:19:58.839 --> 00:20:00.279
<v Speaker 3>lifespan is violent.

405
00:20:00.319 --> 00:20:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Stretched out, so it lives longer.

406
00:20:02.039 --> 00:20:05.839
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it's dilated by a factor of perhaps fifty or sixty,

407
00:20:05.880 --> 00:20:09.359
<v Speaker 3>depending on its exact speed. Because its time is running

408
00:20:09.400 --> 00:20:13.319
<v Speaker 3>an extreme slow motion, it easily survives the ten mile

409
00:20:13.440 --> 00:20:17.599
<v Speaker 3>journey down through the atmosphere before its internal clock finally

410
00:20:17.640 --> 00:20:20.559
<v Speaker 3>reaches the two microsecond mark and it decays.

411
00:20:20.759 --> 00:20:23.240
<v Speaker 2>That perfectly explains why we see them hit the ground.

412
00:20:23.759 --> 00:20:26.759
<v Speaker 2>But the rule of relativity is that there's no preferred

413
00:20:26.799 --> 00:20:29.319
<v Speaker 2>frame of reference, right what happens if we try to

414
00:20:29.359 --> 00:20:31.799
<v Speaker 2>imagine this from the muon's point of view, Because in

415
00:20:31.839 --> 00:20:34.079
<v Speaker 2>the Muon's frame of reference, it isn't moving at all.

416
00:20:34.119 --> 00:20:37.200
<v Speaker 2>It was born, It's sitting completely stationary, and it's the

417
00:20:37.240 --> 00:20:39.119
<v Speaker 2>Earth that is rushing up to hit it at ninety

418
00:20:39.200 --> 00:20:40.920
<v Speaker 2>nine point nine percent of the speed of light.

419
00:20:41.039 --> 00:20:43.720
<v Speaker 3>And that is a perfectly valid physical perspective. In the

420
00:20:43.799 --> 00:20:47.160
<v Speaker 3>muon stationary frame, its internal clock is ticking normally. It

421
00:20:47.200 --> 00:20:50.240
<v Speaker 3>does not experience time dilation from the moment it is created.

422
00:20:50.319 --> 00:20:53.279
<v Speaker 3>It only has two microseconds to live, period.

423
00:20:53.640 --> 00:20:56.119
<v Speaker 2>But if it only lives for two microseconds in its

424
00:20:56.160 --> 00:20:59.920
<v Speaker 2>own reality, how does it physically cross ten miles of atmosphere?

425
00:21:00.039 --> 00:21:03.359
<v Speaker 3>Four dies because of the necessary mirror image of time

426
00:21:03.440 --> 00:21:07.720
<v Speaker 3>dilation length contraction length contraction, space and time are not

427
00:21:07.880 --> 00:21:11.519
<v Speaker 3>separate entities. They are interwoven into a single four dimensional

428
00:21:11.559 --> 00:21:15.359
<v Speaker 3>fabric called space time. When you move at relativistic speeds,

429
00:21:15.440 --> 00:21:18.920
<v Speaker 3>time dilates, but the physical space along the direction of

430
00:21:19.000 --> 00:21:23.480
<v Speaker 3>motion contracts. From the muon's perspective, the Earth is rushing

431
00:21:23.519 --> 00:21:27.200
<v Speaker 3>toward it at near light speed. Therefore, the physical distance

432
00:21:27.200 --> 00:21:30.960
<v Speaker 3>of the Earth's atmosphere is severely length contracted.

433
00:21:30.559 --> 00:21:33.559
<v Speaker 2>So the ten miles of atmosphere literally shrinks.

434
00:21:33.319 --> 00:21:36.119
<v Speaker 3>To the muon. The atmosphere is not ten miles thick,

435
00:21:36.200 --> 00:21:38.319
<v Speaker 3>it is compressed down to a fraction of a mile.

436
00:21:38.640 --> 00:21:41.359
<v Speaker 3>The physical distance it needs to cover is so incredibly

437
00:21:41.400 --> 00:21:44.440
<v Speaker 3>short that even with a lifespan of only two microseconds,

438
00:21:44.599 --> 00:21:47.880
<v Speaker 3>the Earth easily closes the distance before the muon decays.

439
00:21:48.079 --> 00:21:51.119
<v Speaker 2>That is just phenomenal. If you ask the scientist on

440
00:21:51.119 --> 00:21:54.359
<v Speaker 2>the ground, the muon survive because it's time stretched out.

441
00:21:54.519 --> 00:21:57.119
<v Speaker 2>If you ask the muon, it survived because the physical

442
00:21:57.160 --> 00:22:01.000
<v Speaker 2>distance of the universe shrank. Both observe is measured completely

443
00:22:01.039 --> 00:22:04.440
<v Speaker 2>different times, in completely different distances, yet they arrive at

444
00:22:04.440 --> 00:22:08.440
<v Speaker 2>the exact same physical event the muon hits the detector.

445
00:22:08.880 --> 00:22:13.359
<v Speaker 3>Both realities are mathematically true. The undeniable physical fact is

446
00:22:13.359 --> 00:22:16.200
<v Speaker 3>that the muons arrive at the ground, and that absolute

447
00:22:16.200 --> 00:22:19.079
<v Speaker 3>fact could not happen without the elasticity of space time.

448
00:22:19.440 --> 00:22:22.599
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so we've established the first mechanism, moving at high

449
00:22:22.680 --> 00:22:26.480
<v Speaker 2>velocity warps time, but honestly, most of us aren't exactly

450
00:22:26.519 --> 00:22:29.559
<v Speaker 2>traveling at near lightspeed on a Tuesday afternoon. However, the

451
00:22:29.680 --> 00:22:33.160
<v Speaker 2>universe isn't done messing with our clocks. There is a second,

452
00:22:33.319 --> 00:22:36.200
<v Speaker 2>entirely separate force that warps time, and it has absolutely

453
00:22:36.200 --> 00:22:38.880
<v Speaker 2>nothing to do with velocity. It's happening right now, pulling

454
00:22:38.920 --> 00:22:40.519
<v Speaker 2>time apart right beneath our feet.

455
00:22:40.720 --> 00:22:44.000
<v Speaker 3>This brings us to nineteen fifteen, a full decade after

456
00:22:44.039 --> 00:22:48.640
<v Speaker 3>special relativity, Einstein published his General Theory of relativity, which

457
00:22:48.680 --> 00:22:52.319
<v Speaker 3>remains the current standard model of gravitation in modern physics.

458
00:22:52.920 --> 00:22:57.359
<v Speaker 3>General relativity introduced a completely new mechanism for time dilation,

459
00:22:57.880 --> 00:22:58.640
<v Speaker 3>the presence of.

460
00:22:58.640 --> 00:23:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Mass gravitational time dilation. Every time gravity is brought up

461
00:23:02.480 --> 00:23:05.480
<v Speaker 2>in documentaries, they always use the exact same analogy, the

462
00:23:05.519 --> 00:23:08.839
<v Speaker 2>bowling ball sitting on a rubber trampoline creating a dip

463
00:23:08.960 --> 00:23:11.880
<v Speaker 2>that makes smaller marbles roll toward it. But I have

464
00:23:11.920 --> 00:23:15.279
<v Speaker 2>heard physicists actively grown when that analogy is brought up.

465
00:23:15.480 --> 00:23:19.119
<v Speaker 2>Why is it flawed? And how should we actually visualize gravity.

466
00:23:19.480 --> 00:23:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Physicists dislike the trampoline analogy because it uses gravity to

467
00:23:23.000 --> 00:23:26.000
<v Speaker 3>explain gravity. The bowling ball pulls the rubber sheet down

468
00:23:26.039 --> 00:23:28.720
<v Speaker 3>because of the Earth's gravity underneath it. It doesn't actually

469
00:23:28.720 --> 00:23:30.680
<v Speaker 3>explain the mechanism of space time.

470
00:23:30.480 --> 00:23:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Curvature that makes sense, So what's a better way to

471
00:23:32.440 --> 00:23:32.920
<v Speaker 2>picture it?

472
00:23:33.079 --> 00:23:35.720
<v Speaker 3>A much better way to visualize it is to imagine

473
00:23:35.720 --> 00:23:39.880
<v Speaker 3>a three dimensional grid, like a massive block of translucent jelly,

474
00:23:39.920 --> 00:23:43.079
<v Speaker 3>with perfectly straight grid lines drawn through it. If you

475
00:23:43.160 --> 00:23:46.480
<v Speaker 3>inject a massive object like a star or a planet,

476
00:23:46.519 --> 00:23:49.400
<v Speaker 3>into the center of that jelly, it pulls the surrounding

477
00:23:49.400 --> 00:23:52.799
<v Speaker 3>grid lines inward toward itself. The grid lines bunch up

478
00:23:52.839 --> 00:23:54.160
<v Speaker 3>and stretch around the mass.

479
00:23:54.599 --> 00:23:58.720
<v Speaker 2>So gravity isn't a magical invisible tether pulling objects together.

480
00:23:59.240 --> 00:24:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Objects are just trying to move in a straight line

481
00:24:01.200 --> 00:24:04.480
<v Speaker 2>through the jelly, but because the gridlines themselves are curved

482
00:24:04.480 --> 00:24:07.559
<v Speaker 2>toward the planet, following a straight path naturally leads them

483
00:24:07.599 --> 00:24:10.200
<v Speaker 2>into a collision course with a massive object.

484
00:24:10.400 --> 00:24:14.200
<v Speaker 3>Exactly what Newton perceived as a force pulling an apple

485
00:24:14.240 --> 00:24:17.480
<v Speaker 3>from a tree. Einstein revealed to simply be the apple

486
00:24:17.599 --> 00:24:20.519
<v Speaker 3>following the natural curve geometry of space time caused by

487
00:24:20.519 --> 00:24:23.960
<v Speaker 3>the Earth's mass. But here's the critical leap. Space and

488
00:24:24.039 --> 00:24:27.480
<v Speaker 3>time are a single fused fabric. You cannot warp the

489
00:24:27.480 --> 00:24:30.880
<v Speaker 3>spatial grid lines without simultaneously warping the temple gridlines.

490
00:24:30.960 --> 00:24:33.880
<v Speaker 2>So the presence of a massive object literally bends time

491
00:24:34.240 --> 00:24:35.240
<v Speaker 2>just as it bends space.

492
00:24:35.559 --> 00:24:39.519
<v Speaker 3>That is the core revelation of general relativity. Clocks that

493
00:24:39.599 --> 00:24:43.720
<v Speaker 3>are deeper down in a gravitational potential, well meaning they

494
00:24:43.720 --> 00:24:46.559
<v Speaker 3>are physically closer to the center of a massive object,

495
00:24:46.960 --> 00:24:49.680
<v Speaker 3>will run more slowly than clocks that are further away

496
00:24:49.680 --> 00:24:52.279
<v Speaker 3>from the mass. Gravity slows down time.

497
00:24:52.559 --> 00:24:57.039
<v Speaker 2>The physical intuition behind velocity slowing down time made sense

498
00:24:57.279 --> 00:25:02.039
<v Speaker 2>with the light clock geometry. But how did Einstein intuitively

499
00:25:02.119 --> 00:25:05.119
<v Speaker 2>figure out that gravity slows down time? What was the

500
00:25:05.160 --> 00:25:06.119
<v Speaker 2>thought process there?

501
00:25:06.599 --> 00:25:09.279
<v Speaker 3>He used a thought experiment that he later referred to

502
00:25:09.319 --> 00:25:12.640
<v Speaker 3>as his happiest thought. It led to the equivalence principle,

503
00:25:12.680 --> 00:25:16.640
<v Speaker 3>the absolute cornersphone of general relativity. Einstein realized that the

504
00:25:16.640 --> 00:25:20.240
<v Speaker 3>physical local experience of resting inside a gravitational field is

505
00:25:20.359 --> 00:25:23.920
<v Speaker 3>utterly indistinguishable from the experience of being inside an accelerating

506
00:25:23.960 --> 00:25:24.640
<v Speaker 3>reference frame.

507
00:25:25.240 --> 00:25:27.759
<v Speaker 2>Let's break down the elevator thought experiment because this is brilliant.

508
00:25:28.119 --> 00:25:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Imagine an astronaut sealed inside a box like an elevator

509
00:25:31.440 --> 00:25:34.160
<v Speaker 2>car with absolute no windows. They cannot look outside to

510
00:25:34.160 --> 00:25:37.599
<v Speaker 2>see where they are. Scenario one, the box is sitting

511
00:25:37.599 --> 00:25:40.720
<v Speaker 2>stationary on the surface of the Earth. The astronaut feels

512
00:25:40.720 --> 00:25:43.640
<v Speaker 2>their normal weight pressing down on their boots. If they

513
00:25:43.680 --> 00:25:45.640
<v Speaker 2>take a pen out of their pocket and let go,

514
00:25:46.160 --> 00:25:48.960
<v Speaker 2>it drops to the floor at an acceleration of nine

515
00:25:49.000 --> 00:25:50.720
<v Speaker 2>point eight meters per second squared.

516
00:25:51.160 --> 00:25:55.480
<v Speaker 3>Now consider scenario two. Take that exact same windowless box

517
00:25:55.519 --> 00:25:59.759
<v Speaker 3>with the astronaut inside, and teleport it into deep interstellar space,

518
00:26:00.079 --> 00:26:03.720
<v Speaker 3>light years away from any planets or stars. There's zero gravity.

519
00:26:04.000 --> 00:26:08.039
<v Speaker 3>The astronaut is floating. But now attach a massive rocket

520
00:26:08.039 --> 00:26:10.440
<v Speaker 3>thruster to the bottom of the box and fire it

521
00:26:10.440 --> 00:26:13.599
<v Speaker 3>so that the box accelerates upward at precisely nine point

522
00:26:13.599 --> 00:26:15.319
<v Speaker 3>eight meters per second squared.

523
00:26:15.759 --> 00:26:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Because the floor is accelerating up to meet the astronaut

524
00:26:18.200 --> 00:26:21.279
<v Speaker 2>at the exact same rate as Earth's gravity, the astronaut

525
00:26:21.279 --> 00:26:23.720
<v Speaker 2>is pressed down into their boots with the exact same force.

526
00:26:24.319 --> 00:26:26.680
<v Speaker 2>If they let go of the pen, the pen doesn't fall. Rather,

527
00:26:26.880 --> 00:26:29.440
<v Speaker 2>the floor of the box accelerates up and smashes into

528
00:26:29.440 --> 00:26:32.160
<v Speaker 2>the pen at nine point eight meters per second square

529
00:26:32.279 --> 00:26:35.200
<v Speaker 2>exactly from the astronaut's perspective inside the sealed room, the

530
00:26:35.200 --> 00:26:36.759
<v Speaker 2>physics look identically the same.

531
00:26:36.880 --> 00:26:40.279
<v Speaker 3>The equivalence principle states that no local experiment the astronaut

532
00:26:40.279 --> 00:26:43.319
<v Speaker 3>can perform inside that box will allow them to distinguish

533
00:26:43.400 --> 00:26:46.000
<v Speaker 3>whether they are sitting on a planet experience in gravity,

534
00:26:46.599 --> 00:26:50.640
<v Speaker 3>or floating in deep space experiencing constant acceleration. The two

535
00:26:50.680 --> 00:26:53.000
<v Speaker 3>scenarios are completely physically equivalent.

536
00:26:53.279 --> 00:26:57.200
<v Speaker 2>But how does equating gravity to a rocket engine prove

537
00:26:57.279 --> 00:26:58.720
<v Speaker 2>that gravity bends time?

538
00:26:59.160 --> 00:27:02.359
<v Speaker 3>Because if the two environments are truly equivalent, any physical

539
00:27:02.359 --> 00:27:06.359
<v Speaker 3>phenomenon that occurs in the accelerating rocket must also logically

540
00:27:06.359 --> 00:27:09.759
<v Speaker 3>occur in a gravitational field. Think about what happens to

541
00:27:09.880 --> 00:27:13.480
<v Speaker 3>light in that accelerating elevator. Okay, Imagine a laser beam

542
00:27:13.519 --> 00:27:15.880
<v Speaker 3>is fired horizontally from the left wall to the right

543
00:27:15.920 --> 00:27:19.480
<v Speaker 3>wall in a stationary box. It travels in a perfectly

544
00:27:19.480 --> 00:27:23.519
<v Speaker 3>straight horizontal line, But if the box is accelerating upward

545
00:27:23.559 --> 00:27:26.039
<v Speaker 3>at a massive rate, by the time the light reaches

546
00:27:26.079 --> 00:27:28.160
<v Speaker 3>the right wall, the wall has moved up.

547
00:27:28.039 --> 00:27:30.440
<v Speaker 2>So the light being hits the right wall slightly lower

548
00:27:30.480 --> 00:27:32.640
<v Speaker 2>than where it started on the left wall. From the

549
00:27:32.680 --> 00:27:36.680
<v Speaker 2>astronaut's perspective, the light being didn't travel straight. It curved

550
00:27:36.720 --> 00:27:38.799
<v Speaker 2>downward toward the floor exactly.

551
00:27:39.160 --> 00:27:42.759
<v Speaker 3>Acceleration curves the path of light. Therefore, due to the

552
00:27:42.799 --> 00:27:46.759
<v Speaker 3>equivalence principle, gravity must also curve the path of light.

553
00:27:47.759 --> 00:27:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Now apply this logic to time. In the accelerating rocket.

554
00:27:51.720 --> 00:27:55.920
<v Speaker 3>The floor of the box is constantly accelerating, essentially chasing

555
00:27:56.000 --> 00:27:58.920
<v Speaker 3>the light signal sent from the ceiling. Because of the

556
00:27:58.960 --> 00:28:02.599
<v Speaker 3>complex can image of acceleration, the back of the rocket

557
00:28:02.640 --> 00:28:06.119
<v Speaker 3>behaves as though it is moving at a different relative velocity.

558
00:28:05.599 --> 00:28:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Than the front, and we established earlier that different velocities

559
00:28:08.720 --> 00:28:11.920
<v Speaker 2>mean different rates of time. So the acceleration forces the

560
00:28:11.920 --> 00:28:14.559
<v Speaker 2>clock on the floor of the rocket to tick slower

561
00:28:14.599 --> 00:28:15.400
<v Speaker 2>than the clock.

562
00:28:15.119 --> 00:28:17.599
<v Speaker 3>On the ceiling, and the trap snaps shut again. If

563
00:28:17.599 --> 00:28:20.079
<v Speaker 3>a clock at the bottom of an accelerating rocket runs

564
00:28:20.119 --> 00:28:22.680
<v Speaker 3>slower than a clock at the top, and acceleration is

565
00:28:22.720 --> 00:28:26.160
<v Speaker 3>indistinguishable from gravity, then a clock sitting lower down in

566
00:28:26.200 --> 00:28:29.279
<v Speaker 3>a gravitational well must run slower than a clock sitting

567
00:28:29.319 --> 00:28:30.599
<v Speaker 3>higher up, because.

568
00:28:30.319 --> 00:28:33.319
<v Speaker 2>The bottom of the elevator is mathematically identical to being

569
00:28:33.359 --> 00:28:36.640
<v Speaker 2>closer to the center of the Earth. This means gravitational

570
00:28:36.720 --> 00:28:39.960
<v Speaker 2>time dilation isn't just happening near supermassive black holes or

571
00:28:40.000 --> 00:28:42.920
<v Speaker 2>neutron stars. It's happening constantly right here on Earth.

572
00:28:42.920 --> 00:28:43.720
<v Speaker 3>Oh. Absolutely.

573
00:28:43.920 --> 00:28:46.480
<v Speaker 2>A clock sitting on the beach at sea level is

574
00:28:46.519 --> 00:28:50.119
<v Speaker 2>physically ticking slower than an identical clock sitting in the

575
00:28:50.160 --> 00:28:51.839
<v Speaker 2>cabin at the top of the rocky mountains.

576
00:28:51.960 --> 00:28:54.440
<v Speaker 3>The gravitational poll is slightly weaker at the top of

577
00:28:54.480 --> 00:28:56.960
<v Speaker 3>the mountain because the summit is further away from the

578
00:28:57.000 --> 00:29:00.160
<v Speaker 3>dense center of the Earth's mass. Your higher up the

579
00:29:00.200 --> 00:29:04.680
<v Speaker 3>gravitational potential. Well, therefore time flows slightly faster at altitude.

580
00:29:04.759 --> 00:29:08.119
<v Speaker 2>Wait stop there. If time runs slower the closer you

581
00:29:08.160 --> 00:29:10.920
<v Speaker 2>are to the Earth, that means right now, as I'm

582
00:29:10.920 --> 00:29:14.599
<v Speaker 2>sitting in this chair, my feet are experiencing a stronger

583
00:29:14.640 --> 00:29:18.240
<v Speaker 2>gravitational pull than my head, So my feet are physically

584
00:29:18.319 --> 00:29:19.839
<v Speaker 2>aging slower than my brain.

585
00:29:20.160 --> 00:29:22.680
<v Speaker 3>It sounds like the punchline to a physics joke, but

586
00:29:22.799 --> 00:29:27.000
<v Speaker 3>it is a literal, unavoidable biological reality. Your head is

587
00:29:27.119 --> 00:29:29.319
<v Speaker 3>roughly five or six feet further away from the center

588
00:29:29.359 --> 00:29:31.759
<v Speaker 3>of the Earth than your feet are. The gravitational gingradient

589
00:29:31.839 --> 00:29:34.799
<v Speaker 3>across your body means time is passing infinitesimally faster for

590
00:29:34.880 --> 00:29:36.559
<v Speaker 3>your mind than it is for your toes.

591
00:29:36.880 --> 00:29:39.640
<v Speaker 2>How does biological cohesion even work if my blood is

592
00:29:39.680 --> 00:29:41.200
<v Speaker 2>pumping across different time zones.

593
00:29:41.400 --> 00:29:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Because similar to the airplane speeds we talked about, the

594
00:29:44.440 --> 00:29:47.079
<v Speaker 3>difference in gravity across six feet of human height is

595
00:29:47.079 --> 00:29:51.359
<v Speaker 3>incredibly tiny. The time difference accumulated over an entire human

596
00:29:51.400 --> 00:29:54.559
<v Speaker 3>life span would amount to a fraction of a microsecond.

597
00:29:55.359 --> 00:29:59.400
<v Speaker 3>But the conceptual reality remains, your body is spanning a

598
00:29:59.440 --> 00:30:00.039
<v Speaker 3>temporal gri.

599
00:30:00.079 --> 00:30:03.799
<v Speaker 2>Radiant and just like the hefhil keating experiment, physicists couldn't

600
00:30:03.839 --> 00:30:06.640
<v Speaker 2>resist measuring this. But they didn't go to Mount Everest.

601
00:30:07.000 --> 00:30:09.599
<v Speaker 2>They measured the time difference across a distance so small

602
00:30:09.640 --> 00:30:10.799
<v Speaker 2>at borders on the absurd.

603
00:30:10.880 --> 00:30:13.559
<v Speaker 3>You're referring to the twenty ten experiment at the National

604
00:30:13.599 --> 00:30:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Institute of Standards and Technology or NIST in Boulder, Colorado.

605
00:30:17.559 --> 00:30:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's the one.

606
00:30:18.359 --> 00:30:21.839
<v Speaker 3>By twenty ten, chronometry had evolved far beyond the caesium

607
00:30:21.880 --> 00:30:26.039
<v Speaker 3>clocks of the nineteen seventies. NIST physicists were using optical

608
00:30:26.079 --> 00:30:30.400
<v Speaker 3>aluminum ion clocks. These devices trap a single charged atom

609
00:30:30.440 --> 00:30:34.240
<v Speaker 3>of aluminum using electromagnetic fields and measure the incredibly rapid

610
00:30:34.240 --> 00:30:37.640
<v Speaker 3>oscillations of its energy state using ultraviolet lasers.

611
00:30:38.000 --> 00:30:40.559
<v Speaker 2>A clock that relies on a single vibrating atom.

612
00:30:40.759 --> 00:30:43.519
<v Speaker 3>They are so unthinkably precise that they would neither gain

613
00:30:43.599 --> 00:30:46.279
<v Speaker 3>nor lose a single second over an estimated three point

614
00:30:46.359 --> 00:30:47.680
<v Speaker 3>seven billion years.

615
00:30:47.480 --> 00:30:49.640
<v Speaker 2>That's almost the age of the Earth exactly.

616
00:30:49.880 --> 00:30:53.359
<v Speaker 3>They are sensitive enough to detect microscopic fluctuations in the

617
00:30:53.400 --> 00:30:57.039
<v Speaker 3>fabric of space time itself. The physicists took two of

618
00:30:57.079 --> 00:31:00.519
<v Speaker 3>these aluminum ion clocks, synchronize them, and placed them in

619
00:31:00.519 --> 00:31:04.000
<v Speaker 3>the same laboratory, but they separated them in height.

620
00:31:04.000 --> 00:31:06.839
<v Speaker 2>By how much like a few stories in a building, by.

621
00:31:06.720 --> 00:31:09.559
<v Speaker 3>Thirty three centimeters roughly one foot.

622
00:31:09.240 --> 00:31:11.359
<v Speaker 2>One foot a single step on a.

623
00:31:11.279 --> 00:31:15.119
<v Speaker 3>Staircase, just a single step, and they monitored the ticking rates.

624
00:31:15.559 --> 00:31:18.359
<v Speaker 3>The clock that was thirty three centimeters higher up ran

625
00:31:18.440 --> 00:31:21.680
<v Speaker 3>demonstrably faster than the clock that was lower down. The

626
00:31:21.720 --> 00:31:25.039
<v Speaker 3>results perfectly aligned with the equations of general relativity.

627
00:31:25.240 --> 00:31:27.960
<v Speaker 2>The universe has a resolution so fine that it is

628
00:31:28.079 --> 00:31:31.440
<v Speaker 2>actively keeping track of the gravitational time difference across the

629
00:31:31.480 --> 00:31:32.680
<v Speaker 2>height of a coffee table.

630
00:31:32.759 --> 00:31:36.119
<v Speaker 3>The structure of reality is incredibly sensitive. The curvature of

631
00:31:36.160 --> 00:31:39.079
<v Speaker 3>the universe, dictates the rate of time at the macrostopic

632
00:31:39.160 --> 00:31:42.319
<v Speaker 3>scale of galaxies and at the microscopic scale of your

633
00:31:42.319 --> 00:31:42.839
<v Speaker 3>living room.

634
00:31:43.160 --> 00:31:45.839
<v Speaker 2>It's so easy to listen to all of this aluminum

635
00:31:45.880 --> 00:31:50.160
<v Speaker 2>ion clocks, fractions of a nanosecond variations across a footstool

636
00:31:50.519 --> 00:31:54.160
<v Speaker 2>and file it away as microscopic trivia. It's a brilliant

637
00:31:54.200 --> 00:31:58.359
<v Speaker 2>flex of experimental physics. But it feels completely disconnected from

638
00:31:58.400 --> 00:31:59.400
<v Speaker 2>daily human life.

639
00:31:59.480 --> 00:32:01.680
<v Speaker 3>But that is the ultimate illusion, right.

640
00:32:02.160 --> 00:32:05.559
<v Speaker 2>The terrifying truth is that you, the listener, rely on

641
00:32:05.599 --> 00:32:09.680
<v Speaker 2>this relativistic weirdness to navigate your day. If we ignored

642
00:32:09.720 --> 00:32:12.920
<v Speaker 2>the fact that time bends and warps, our modern civilization

643
00:32:12.960 --> 00:32:16.440
<v Speaker 2>would start to collapse within a few hours. Let's talk

644
00:32:16.440 --> 00:32:19.319
<v Speaker 2>about the system that proves Einstein wright billions of times

645
00:32:19.359 --> 00:32:22.119
<v Speaker 2>a day. The Global Positioning System.

646
00:32:21.880 --> 00:32:25.480
<v Speaker 3>The GPS network is the ultimate, undeniable, practical application of

647
00:32:25.519 --> 00:32:28.799
<v Speaker 3>relativistic physics. It's a constellation of at least twenty four

648
00:32:28.839 --> 00:32:33.160
<v Speaker 3>satellites orbiting the Earth, providing continuous location data to military assets,

649
00:32:33.359 --> 00:32:36.400
<v Speaker 3>commercial shipping, aviation, and of course, the phone in your pocket.

650
00:32:36.440 --> 00:32:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's break down exactly how my phone knows I'm standing

651
00:32:38.640 --> 00:32:41.759
<v Speaker 2>on a specific street corner. How does GPS actually work.

652
00:32:41.960 --> 00:32:45.799
<v Speaker 3>It's a process called trilateration, and it is entirely dependent

653
00:32:45.880 --> 00:32:50.559
<v Speaker 3>on ultra precise timing. Every GPS satellite is carrying multiple

654
00:32:50.599 --> 00:32:55.119
<v Speaker 3>atomic clocks. These satellites are constantly broadcasting a radio signal

655
00:32:55.200 --> 00:32:55.839
<v Speaker 3>down to Earth.

656
00:32:56.240 --> 00:32:57.519
<v Speaker 2>Okay, and what's in the signal?

657
00:32:57.640 --> 00:33:01.559
<v Speaker 3>The signal contains two vital pieces of information, the exact

658
00:33:01.680 --> 00:33:04.759
<v Speaker 3>identity and location of the satellite in orbit and the

659
00:33:04.799 --> 00:33:07.079
<v Speaker 3>precise time the signal was transmitted.

660
00:33:07.200 --> 00:33:10.200
<v Speaker 2>So my phone's GPS receiver isn't transmitting anything, it's just

661
00:33:10.359 --> 00:33:12.319
<v Speaker 2>listening for these signals raining down.

662
00:33:12.119 --> 00:33:15.519
<v Speaker 3>From space exactly. Your phone picks up signals from at

663
00:33:15.599 --> 00:33:19.359
<v Speaker 3>least four different satellites simultaneously. Radio waves travel at the

664
00:33:19.359 --> 00:33:22.359
<v Speaker 3>speed of light, which is a known constant. When your

665
00:33:22.400 --> 00:33:25.400
<v Speaker 3>phone receives a signal, it checks its own internal clock

666
00:33:25.440 --> 00:33:27.440
<v Speaker 3>and compares it to the time stamp of when the

667
00:33:27.440 --> 00:33:30.680
<v Speaker 3>signal left the satellite. The tiny delay the time it

668
00:33:30.680 --> 00:33:33.160
<v Speaker 3>took the signal to travel from space to your pocket,

669
00:33:33.279 --> 00:33:36.279
<v Speaker 3>allows the phone to calculate exactly how far away that

670
00:33:36.400 --> 00:33:37.839
<v Speaker 3>specific satellite.

671
00:33:37.519 --> 00:33:42.119
<v Speaker 2>Is because speed times time equals distance. If I know

672
00:33:42.200 --> 00:33:44.319
<v Speaker 2>the signal took exactly a fraction of a second to

673
00:33:44.359 --> 00:33:46.359
<v Speaker 2>reach me, and I know the speed of light. I

674
00:33:46.359 --> 00:33:49.640
<v Speaker 2>know I'm sitting exactly on the edge of an imaginary

675
00:33:49.640 --> 00:33:52.599
<v Speaker 2>sphere extending outward from that satellite precisely.

676
00:33:53.119 --> 00:33:55.480
<v Speaker 3>One satellite tells you that you are somewhere on the

677
00:33:55.519 --> 00:33:59.759
<v Speaker 3>surface of a massive sphere. Two satellites intersect to create

678
00:33:59.839 --> 00:34:04.279
<v Speaker 3>a circle of possible locations. Three satellites intersect at exactly

679
00:34:04.319 --> 00:34:07.519
<v Speaker 3>two points in space, and the fourth satellite eliminates one

680
00:34:07.519 --> 00:34:11.000
<v Speaker 3>of those points, pinpointing your exact latitude, longitude, and altitude

681
00:34:11.039 --> 00:34:12.000
<v Speaker 3>on the surface of the Earth.

682
00:34:12.920 --> 00:34:16.719
<v Speaker 2>Because light travels incredibly fast roughly three hundred thousand kilometers

683
00:34:16.760 --> 00:34:19.880
<v Speaker 2>per second, that time delay measurement has to be flawless.

684
00:34:20.519 --> 00:34:22.199
<v Speaker 2>If the clock on the satellite and the clock on

685
00:34:22.239 --> 00:34:24.480
<v Speaker 2>my phone are out of sync by even a microscopic

686
00:34:24.599 --> 00:34:28.079
<v Speaker 2>fraction of a second, the distance calpulation will be wildly wrong.

687
00:34:28.199 --> 00:34:32.119
<v Speaker 3>The synchronization must be maintained to an extraordinary, mind bending

688
00:34:32.239 --> 00:34:35.400
<v Speaker 3>level of precision, and this is where the genius of

689
00:34:35.440 --> 00:34:39.280
<v Speaker 3>Albert Einstein collides with modern engineering. The clocks on those

690
00:34:39.280 --> 00:34:42.239
<v Speaker 3>satellites are orbiting the Earth, which means they are being

691
00:34:42.239 --> 00:34:46.280
<v Speaker 3>subjected to both special and general relativity simultaneously, and the

692
00:34:46.320 --> 00:34:49.039
<v Speaker 3>two theories are pulling time in opposite directions.

693
00:34:49.519 --> 00:34:52.199
<v Speaker 2>This is the ultimate physics math problem. Okay, let's start

694
00:34:52.199 --> 00:34:54.400
<v Speaker 2>with the motion special relativity.

695
00:34:54.960 --> 00:34:58.800
<v Speaker 3>To maintain a stable orbit, GPS satellites travel at roughly

696
00:34:58.880 --> 00:35:02.360
<v Speaker 3>fourteen thousand kilometer per hour relative to receivers on the ground.

697
00:35:02.920 --> 00:35:05.719
<v Speaker 3>As we learn from the light clock, high velocity means

698
00:35:05.880 --> 00:35:10.239
<v Speaker 3>slower time. Because they're moving so fast, special relativistic time

699
00:35:10.280 --> 00:35:13.440
<v Speaker 3>dilation causes the satellite clocks to tick slower than clocks

700
00:35:13.480 --> 00:35:16.320
<v Speaker 3>on the ground. The math calculates that they lose about

701
00:35:16.360 --> 00:35:19.800
<v Speaker 3>seven microseconds seven millions of a second every single day.

702
00:35:19.960 --> 00:35:23.199
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so special relativity is dragging the clocks backward by

703
00:35:23.199 --> 00:35:26.679
<v Speaker 2>seven microseconds a day. But the satellites aren't just moving fast.

704
00:35:26.719 --> 00:35:27.599
<v Speaker 2>They're very high up.

705
00:35:27.639 --> 00:35:31.360
<v Speaker 3>They orbit at an altitude of approximately twenty thousand kilometers.

706
00:35:32.039 --> 00:35:35.519
<v Speaker 3>At that extreme distance, they are significantly higher up the

707
00:35:35.559 --> 00:35:39.239
<v Speaker 3>Earth's gravitational potential well than we are. The gravity they

708
00:35:39.320 --> 00:35:42.199
<v Speaker 3>experience is roughly one quarter as strong as the gravity

709
00:35:42.199 --> 00:35:45.480
<v Speaker 3>on the surface, and as we learn from the equivalence principle,

710
00:35:45.639 --> 00:35:47.840
<v Speaker 3>weaker gravity means faster time.

711
00:35:48.280 --> 00:35:50.719
<v Speaker 2>So general relativity is pushing the clocks.

712
00:35:50.360 --> 00:35:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Forward, yes, because they reside in a weaker gravitational field.

713
00:35:54.639 --> 00:35:58.840
<v Speaker 3>General relativistic time dilation causes the satellite clocks to run

714
00:35:58.920 --> 00:36:02.159
<v Speaker 3>faster than clocks on the ground by approximately forty five

715
00:36:02.239 --> 00:36:03.320
<v Speaker 3>microseconds per day.

716
00:36:03.559 --> 00:36:07.039
<v Speaker 2>So we have a relativistic tug of war. Motion slows

717
00:36:07.079 --> 00:36:10.760
<v Speaker 2>them down by seven microseconds. Gravity speeds them up by

718
00:36:10.760 --> 00:36:12.000
<v Speaker 2>forty five microseconds.

719
00:36:12.079 --> 00:36:14.440
<v Speaker 3>You combine the effects to find the net differential. The

720
00:36:14.480 --> 00:36:17.840
<v Speaker 3>gravitational effect is stronger. The satellite clocks run fast by

721
00:36:17.840 --> 00:36:21.159
<v Speaker 3>a net total of thirty eight microseconds per day relative

722
00:36:21.159 --> 00:36:22.840
<v Speaker 3>to clocks resting on the surface of the.

723
00:36:22.800 --> 00:36:26.639
<v Speaker 2>Earth thirty eight microseconds thirty eight millions of a second

724
00:36:26.679 --> 00:36:29.559
<v Speaker 2>a day. Imagine being the project managers in the nineteen

725
00:36:29.599 --> 00:36:32.559
<v Speaker 2>seventies trying to build this system. It'd be so tempting

726
00:36:32.760 --> 00:36:36.000
<v Speaker 2>to look at that number and say Einstein's theories are

727
00:36:36.039 --> 00:36:39.280
<v Speaker 2>a mathematical headache. Thirty eight millions of a second is

728
00:36:39.280 --> 00:36:42.400
<v Speaker 2>a rounding error. Let's just assume Newtonian time is universal,

729
00:36:42.440 --> 00:36:46.159
<v Speaker 2>ignore the relativity, and launch the satellites. What happens if

730
00:36:46.199 --> 00:36:47.920
<v Speaker 2>we ignore the thirty eight microseconds.

731
00:36:48.000 --> 00:36:51.360
<v Speaker 3>If the engineers had ignored that relativistic drift, the entire

732
00:36:51.440 --> 00:36:54.079
<v Speaker 3>GPS network would be worse than useless. It would be

733
00:36:54.159 --> 00:36:58.960
<v Speaker 3>catastrophically dangerous. Because the system calculates distance based on the

734
00:36:58.960 --> 00:37:02.280
<v Speaker 3>speed of light, a timing error of a single microsecond

735
00:37:02.400 --> 00:37:05.400
<v Speaker 3>translates to a distance error of roughly three hundred meters

736
00:37:05.840 --> 00:37:07.280
<v Speaker 3>or about one thousand feet.

737
00:37:07.519 --> 00:37:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, one microsecond equals one thousand feet of error

738
00:37:10.960 --> 00:37:11.400
<v Speaker 2>on the map.

739
00:37:11.559 --> 00:37:14.440
<v Speaker 3>If you let an uncorrected error of thirty eight microseconds

740
00:37:14.440 --> 00:37:18.039
<v Speaker 3>accumulate over a single day, the position calculations would drift

741
00:37:18.119 --> 00:37:20.119
<v Speaker 3>by more than eleven kilometers per day.

742
00:37:20.679 --> 00:37:23.519
<v Speaker 2>Eleven kilometers of error added every single day.

743
00:37:23.719 --> 00:37:27.280
<v Speaker 3>Every day, within a matter of hours, your phone's GPS

744
00:37:27.280 --> 00:37:30.360
<v Speaker 3>would place you blocks away from your actual location. By

745
00:37:30.400 --> 00:37:31.719
<v Speaker 3>the end of the day, it would tell you to

746
00:37:31.760 --> 00:37:33.679
<v Speaker 3>turn your car into a river, or insist that a

747
00:37:33.679 --> 00:37:36.599
<v Speaker 3>commercial airliner was miles away from the runway was trying

748
00:37:36.639 --> 00:37:40.159
<v Speaker 3>to land on. The banking system, which relies on GPS

749
00:37:40.159 --> 00:37:44.400
<v Speaker 3>timestamps to synchronize global financial transactions, would desynchronize and fail.

750
00:37:45.280 --> 00:37:48.639
<v Speaker 3>The power grid, which uses GPS to phase aligne alternating

751
00:37:48.639 --> 00:37:53.239
<v Speaker 3>current across vast distances, could experience massive cascading blackouts.

752
00:37:53.559 --> 00:37:58.159
<v Speaker 2>That is genuinely terrifying. Our modern infrastructure is entirely dependent

753
00:37:58.199 --> 00:38:00.840
<v Speaker 2>on a network of space clocks that we literally had

754
00:38:00.880 --> 00:38:03.679
<v Speaker 2>to program to ticket the wrong speed before we launched them,

755
00:38:03.880 --> 00:38:05.400
<v Speaker 2>just so they would sync up with us once they

756
00:38:05.440 --> 00:38:08.000
<v Speaker 2>hit the warping of orbit. We have built the curvature

757
00:38:08.000 --> 00:38:10.000
<v Speaker 2>of space time into our everyday tools.

758
00:38:10.199 --> 00:38:13.679
<v Speaker 3>Without a deep functional understanding of how both velocity and

759
00:38:13.719 --> 00:38:16.639
<v Speaker 3>gravity warp the passage of time, the modern world as

760
00:38:16.679 --> 00:38:19.000
<v Speaker 3>we know it would not function. It is the most

761
00:38:19.039 --> 00:38:22.119
<v Speaker 3>consequential daily proof of relativity in existence.

762
00:38:22.480 --> 00:38:26.519
<v Speaker 2>So we've conquered the microsecond scale. We've mastered the microscopic

763
00:38:26.559 --> 00:38:29.079
<v Speaker 2>fractions of a second needed to keep our banking systems

764
00:38:29.159 --> 00:38:33.199
<v Speaker 2>running and our digital maps accurate. But human ambition doesn't

765
00:38:33.199 --> 00:38:36.119
<v Speaker 2>stop at low Earth orbit. What happens when we scale

766
00:38:36.199 --> 00:38:39.960
<v Speaker 2>this up? What happens to human biology, human psychology, and

767
00:38:40.039 --> 00:38:43.800
<v Speaker 2>human society when we push the math of relativity to

768
00:38:43.840 --> 00:38:46.119
<v Speaker 2>the extremes of deep space travel.

769
00:38:46.599 --> 00:38:49.199
<v Speaker 3>When we extrapolate these equations to the macro scale, we

770
00:38:49.360 --> 00:38:52.880
<v Speaker 3>run into the most famous and historically the most fiercely

771
00:38:52.960 --> 00:38:57.679
<v Speaker 3>debated thought experiment in all of relativistic physics, the twin paradox.

772
00:38:57.840 --> 00:39:00.000
<v Speaker 2>I have struggled with the twin paradox for years, because

773
00:39:00.000 --> 00:39:02.920
<v Speaker 2>because it feels like a logical trap that relativity sets

774
00:39:02.960 --> 00:39:04.840
<v Speaker 2>for itself set the stage for us.

775
00:39:05.039 --> 00:39:08.159
<v Speaker 3>The premise is simple. Imagine a pair of identical twins

776
00:39:08.199 --> 00:39:10.599
<v Speaker 3>born on the exact same day. Let's call them the

777
00:39:10.639 --> 00:39:13.440
<v Speaker 3>traveler and the home body. The traveler gets into a

778
00:39:13.519 --> 00:39:17.400
<v Speaker 3>highly advanced spacecraft capable of interstellar travel. She fires up

779
00:39:17.440 --> 00:39:20.440
<v Speaker 3>the engines and accelerates to a massive speed, say ninety

780
00:39:20.480 --> 00:39:22.679
<v Speaker 3>percent of the speed of light. She travels to a

781
00:39:22.719 --> 00:39:26.320
<v Speaker 3>distant star system, slows down to turn around, accelerates back

782
00:39:26.320 --> 00:39:29.519
<v Speaker 3>to ninety percent of the speed of light, and eventually returns.

783
00:39:29.119 --> 00:39:30.679
<v Speaker 2>To Earth and the home body twin.

784
00:39:30.840 --> 00:39:34.400
<v Speaker 3>The homebody stays completely stationary on Earth, working at a desk,

785
00:39:34.519 --> 00:39:36.920
<v Speaker 3>waiting for her sister to return from the voyage.

786
00:39:37.039 --> 00:39:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, applying what we know about special relativity and the

787
00:39:39.960 --> 00:39:43.639
<v Speaker 2>Lorenz factor, the traveler is moving incredibly fast relative to

788
00:39:43.639 --> 00:39:48.320
<v Speaker 2>the Earth. High velocity means time dilation, so the traveler's

789
00:39:48.360 --> 00:39:51.079
<v Speaker 2>internal clock, the ticking of her watch, the beating of

790
00:39:51.079 --> 00:39:54.039
<v Speaker 2>her heart, the cellular aging of her body is running

791
00:39:54.079 --> 00:39:56.239
<v Speaker 2>significantly slower than the clocks on Earth.

792
00:39:56.400 --> 00:39:59.440
<v Speaker 3>Correct. When the spacecraft finally lands back on Earth and

793
00:39:59.480 --> 00:40:03.000
<v Speaker 3>the door open, the math dictates that significantly less time

794
00:40:03.039 --> 00:40:06.000
<v Speaker 3>has passed for the traveler than for the homebody. The

795
00:40:06.039 --> 00:40:09.239
<v Speaker 3>traveler steps out of the ship physically biologically younger than

796
00:40:09.280 --> 00:40:10.880
<v Speaker 3>her identical twin who stayed behind.

797
00:40:11.119 --> 00:40:13.599
<v Speaker 2>But here is where my brain rebels and where the

798
00:40:13.760 --> 00:40:17.920
<v Speaker 2>paradox wears its head. Einstein's whole premise is that motion

799
00:40:18.119 --> 00:40:22.280
<v Speaker 2>is relative. There's no absolute stationary background to the universe.

800
00:40:22.639 --> 00:40:25.400
<v Speaker 2>If the traveler is sitting in her spaceship looking out

801
00:40:25.400 --> 00:40:28.159
<v Speaker 2>the window, why couldn't she just claim that her ship

802
00:40:28.199 --> 00:40:31.840
<v Speaker 2>is completely stationary And it's the Earth that fired invisible

803
00:40:31.880 --> 00:40:34.880
<v Speaker 2>engines and rocketed away from her at ninety percent of

804
00:40:34.920 --> 00:40:36.599
<v Speaker 2>the speed of light and then came flying back.

805
00:40:36.679 --> 00:40:39.199
<v Speaker 3>That is the exact crux of the problem. It's a

806
00:40:39.280 --> 00:40:43.079
<v Speaker 3>brilliant question, and it cause immense confusion in the early

807
00:40:43.199 --> 00:40:45.280
<v Speaker 3>days of relativity, because if.

808
00:40:45.199 --> 00:40:47.800
<v Speaker 2>The traveler thinks the Earth is the thing moving, then

809
00:40:47.840 --> 00:40:51.000
<v Speaker 2>from her perspective, the Earth's time should be running slower.

810
00:40:51.320 --> 00:40:53.960
<v Speaker 2>She should expect the homebody twin to be the younger one.

811
00:40:54.119 --> 00:40:56.519
<v Speaker 2>Both twins have perfectly valid reasons to look at the

812
00:40:56.519 --> 00:40:58.760
<v Speaker 2>other and say, you are the one moving, so your

813
00:40:58.800 --> 00:41:01.800
<v Speaker 2>time is slower. But when the ship lands, they can't

814
00:41:01.800 --> 00:41:04.000
<v Speaker 2>both be younger than each other. One of them actually

815
00:41:04.000 --> 00:41:07.400
<v Speaker 2>steps out of the ship definitively younger. How is that

816
00:41:07.480 --> 00:41:09.719
<v Speaker 2>not a phatological flaw in the theory.

817
00:41:09.679 --> 00:41:12.599
<v Speaker 3>It appears to be a paradox, But the resolution lies

818
00:41:12.639 --> 00:41:17.119
<v Speaker 3>in a critical physical asymmetry between their two journeys. The

819
00:41:17.159 --> 00:41:20.599
<v Speaker 3>principle of relativity, the idea that you cannot determine who

820
00:41:20.639 --> 00:41:24.679
<v Speaker 3>is really moving, only applies perfectly to inertial reference frames.

821
00:41:25.079 --> 00:41:27.480
<v Speaker 3>An inertial frame is a perspective that is moving at

822
00:41:27.480 --> 00:41:31.760
<v Speaker 3>a steady, constant velocity in a straight line with no acceleration.

823
00:41:32.159 --> 00:41:35.119
<v Speaker 2>But the traveler didn't just move at a constant velocity forever.

824
00:41:35.440 --> 00:41:37.000
<v Speaker 2>She had to turn around exactly.

825
00:41:37.440 --> 00:41:40.280
<v Speaker 3>To leave Earth, the traveler had to ignite her engines

826
00:41:40.320 --> 00:41:43.880
<v Speaker 3>and experience enormous acceleration forces pressing her into her seat.

827
00:41:44.559 --> 00:41:47.519
<v Speaker 3>To stop at the distant star, she had to violently decelerate.

828
00:41:47.880 --> 00:41:50.239
<v Speaker 3>To come back, she had to accelerate again, and to

829
00:41:50.280 --> 00:41:52.800
<v Speaker 3>park the ship back on Earth, she had to decelerate

830
00:41:52.840 --> 00:41:56.360
<v Speaker 3>one final time. The traveler physically felt the g forces

831
00:41:56.360 --> 00:41:57.880
<v Speaker 3>of changing velocity, while.

832
00:41:57.760 --> 00:42:00.000
<v Speaker 2>The home body twin just sat in a comfortable chair

833
00:42:00.079 --> 00:42:03.079
<v Speaker 2>on Earth, never experiencing any massive g forces.

834
00:42:03.239 --> 00:42:07.480
<v Speaker 3>The acceleration entirely breaks the symmetry between the two perspectives.

835
00:42:08.119 --> 00:42:11.039
<v Speaker 3>The home body remained in the single inertial reference frame

836
00:42:11.079 --> 00:42:15.639
<v Speaker 3>the entire time. The traveler, however, jumped between multiple different

837
00:42:15.679 --> 00:42:19.239
<v Speaker 3>reference frames, the outbound frame, the turning around accelerating frame,

838
00:42:19.280 --> 00:42:22.039
<v Speaker 3>and the inbound frame. The universe is fully aware of

839
00:42:22.079 --> 00:42:27.400
<v Speaker 3>who accelerated, because acceleration is an absolute, physically measurable experience.

840
00:42:28.079 --> 00:42:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Because of this asymmetry, the mathematical calculations yield an absolute result.

841
00:42:33.440 --> 00:42:36.639
<v Speaker 3>The twin who underwent the acceleration and changed reference frames

842
00:42:36.800 --> 00:42:38.840
<v Speaker 3>is unequivocally the one who ages less.

843
00:42:39.519 --> 00:42:41.599
<v Speaker 2>So it is not a paradox at all. It's just

844
00:42:41.639 --> 00:42:45.000
<v Speaker 2>a highly counterintuitive physical fact. If we ever build an

845
00:42:45.000 --> 00:42:48.119
<v Speaker 2>engine capable of this, the traveling twin will return younger,

846
00:42:48.559 --> 00:42:51.440
<v Speaker 2>and depending on the velocity. We aren't talking about microseconds anymore.

847
00:42:51.440 --> 00:42:54.480
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about decades. Let's invent a hypothetical mission to

848
00:42:54.519 --> 00:42:57.320
<v Speaker 2>truly grasp the deep space implications of this. Let's say

849
00:42:57.320 --> 00:42:59.280
<v Speaker 2>we want to send a human crew to explore a

850
00:42:59.280 --> 00:43:02.239
<v Speaker 2>star system that is four hundred light years away, and

851
00:43:02.280 --> 00:43:04.239
<v Speaker 2>we've engineered a ship the can cruise at ninety nine

852
00:43:04.280 --> 00:43:05.239
<v Speaker 2>percent of the speed of light.

853
00:43:05.400 --> 00:43:09.880
<v Speaker 3>The math here shifts from physics to profound sociology. Let's

854
00:43:09.920 --> 00:43:13.480
<v Speaker 3>look at the timeline from Earth's perspective. First, the star

855
00:43:13.719 --> 00:43:16.519
<v Speaker 3>is four hundred light years away. The ship is traveling

856
00:43:16.559 --> 00:43:19.199
<v Speaker 3>at just under the speed of light. Therefore, from the

857
00:43:19.199 --> 00:43:21.960
<v Speaker 3>perspective of mission control on Earth, it's going to take

858
00:43:22.000 --> 00:43:24.239
<v Speaker 3>the ship slightly more than four hundred years to reach

859
00:43:24.239 --> 00:43:24.920
<v Speaker 3>the destination.

860
00:43:25.559 --> 00:43:29.679
<v Speaker 2>Four centuries we launched the ship, and everyone involved in

861
00:43:29.719 --> 00:43:32.760
<v Speaker 2>the launch dies of old age. Their great great grandchildren

862
00:43:32.800 --> 00:43:36.199
<v Speaker 2>die of old age. Entire empires could rise and collapse.

863
00:43:36.239 --> 00:43:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Technology will revolutionize completely. But what is the experience of

864
00:43:40.519 --> 00:43:42.039
<v Speaker 2>the crew inside the ship?

865
00:43:42.360 --> 00:43:44.800
<v Speaker 3>Inside the ship cruising at ninety nine percent at the

866
00:43:44.800 --> 00:43:47.920
<v Speaker 3>speed of light, the Lorentz factor is roughly seven. The

867
00:43:48.000 --> 00:43:50.920
<v Speaker 3>time dilation is immense for the crew. The journey does

868
00:43:50.920 --> 00:43:54.320
<v Speaker 3>not drag on for four hundred years. From their biological

869
00:43:54.320 --> 00:43:57.880
<v Speaker 3>and psychological perspective, only about fifty six years will elapse

870
00:43:57.960 --> 00:43:59.519
<v Speaker 3>during the entire outbound transit.

871
00:44:01.079 --> 00:44:03.679
<v Speaker 2>A young astronaut in their twenties boards the ship, and

872
00:44:03.719 --> 00:44:06.760
<v Speaker 2>they arrive at the destination in their late seventies. They

873
00:44:06.800 --> 00:44:10.800
<v Speaker 2>experience a single human lifetime, while the Earth experiences four

874
00:44:10.960 --> 00:44:11.679
<v Speaker 2>centuries of.

875
00:44:11.719 --> 00:44:15.119
<v Speaker 3>History, and consider the implications if they attempt to return.

876
00:44:15.639 --> 00:44:17.840
<v Speaker 3>If they spend a few years exploring and then fly

877
00:44:17.960 --> 00:44:20.760
<v Speaker 3>back to Earth at the same speed, another fifty six

878
00:44:20.800 --> 00:44:23.400
<v Speaker 3>years will pass for them, but another four hundred years

879
00:44:23.400 --> 00:44:24.199
<v Speaker 3>will pass on Earth.

880
00:44:24.360 --> 00:44:27.199
<v Speaker 2>They will return having aged a little over a century,

881
00:44:27.800 --> 00:44:30.800
<v Speaker 2>but they will step out of the airlock onto an

882
00:44:30.880 --> 00:44:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Earth that is more than eight hundred years older than

883
00:44:33.000 --> 00:44:33.840
<v Speaker 2>the one they left.

884
00:44:34.119 --> 00:44:38.039
<v Speaker 3>They would return to a completely alien world. The language

885
00:44:38.119 --> 00:44:41.360
<v Speaker 3>might be incomprehensible, the nations that launched them might no

886
00:44:41.440 --> 00:44:45.159
<v Speaker 3>longer exist. Everyone they ever knew, loved, or read about

887
00:44:45.159 --> 00:44:48.840
<v Speaker 3>would be ancient historical footnotes. Time dilation autolates at the

888
00:44:48.920 --> 00:44:52.960
<v Speaker 3>absolute limits of human endurance. The same mathematical principles that

889
00:44:53.000 --> 00:44:55.880
<v Speaker 3>make a smartphone map accurate today act as a one

890
00:44:55.920 --> 00:44:59.079
<v Speaker 3>way time machine into the future. For interstellar travelers.

891
00:44:59.199 --> 00:45:02.320
<v Speaker 2>It imposes a t tragic quarantine on the universe. You

892
00:45:02.360 --> 00:45:05.199
<v Speaker 2>are physically allowed to travel among the stars, but the

893
00:45:05.280 --> 00:45:08.519
<v Speaker 2>universe demands that you sacrifice your own timeline, your own era,

894
00:45:08.760 --> 00:45:11.519
<v Speaker 2>to pay for the ticket. The isolation is profound.

895
00:45:11.679 --> 00:45:15.159
<v Speaker 3>It is the ultimate boundary condition of human exploration, and

896
00:45:15.239 --> 00:45:19.079
<v Speaker 3>we must remember this relativistic framework isn't just a quirky

897
00:45:19.119 --> 00:45:22.800
<v Speaker 3>hurdle for future astronauts. It's already deeply embedded in the

898
00:45:22.800 --> 00:45:26.960
<v Speaker 3>bedrock of modern physics. In quantum field theory, which governs

899
00:45:26.960 --> 00:45:30.880
<v Speaker 3>the subatomic realm, particle physicists deal with extreme time dilation

900
00:45:31.000 --> 00:45:34.880
<v Speaker 3>as a routine shore when they accelerate particles and colliders

901
00:45:34.920 --> 00:45:37.480
<v Speaker 3>like cern, the particles are moving at fractions of a

902
00:45:37.480 --> 00:45:40.880
<v Speaker 3>percent below the speed of light, their observed decay rates

903
00:45:40.920 --> 00:45:45.039
<v Speaker 3>stretch out massively due to the Lorentz factor. The physicists

904
00:45:45.119 --> 00:45:47.920
<v Speaker 3>have to manually correct for time dilation just to make

905
00:45:47.960 --> 00:45:52.239
<v Speaker 3>their quantum equations balance. The theory is flawlessly robust, from

906
00:45:52.280 --> 00:45:54.920
<v Speaker 3>the scale of the subatomic to the scale of the galactic.

907
00:45:55.039 --> 00:45:57.679
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so we know the math is bulletproof. The GPS

908
00:45:57.679 --> 00:46:00.840
<v Speaker 2>satellites prove the engineering works. Particle clisights prove the quantum

909
00:46:00.880 --> 00:46:04.440
<v Speaker 2>mechanics work. The physical reality of time stretching and shrinking

910
00:46:04.480 --> 00:46:08.280
<v Speaker 2>is undeniable. But this forces us into a very uncomfortable corner.

911
00:46:08.639 --> 00:46:11.199
<v Speaker 2>If time runs at vastly different speeds depending on where

912
00:46:11.239 --> 00:46:13.199
<v Speaker 2>you were sitting, how strong the gravity is, and how

913
00:46:13.199 --> 00:46:15.199
<v Speaker 2>fast you're moving, what does that actually mean for the

914
00:46:15.199 --> 00:46:16.639
<v Speaker 2>concept of now This is.

915
00:46:16.639 --> 00:46:19.719
<v Speaker 3>Where we cross the border from rigid physics into the deepest,

916
00:46:19.800 --> 00:46:25.119
<v Speaker 3>most unsettling realms of philosophy. Because relativity essentially assassinates our

917
00:46:25.199 --> 00:46:27.400
<v Speaker 3>intuitive understanding of the present moment.

918
00:46:27.760 --> 00:46:30.400
<v Speaker 2>We all walk around with this ingrained belief that there

919
00:46:30.480 --> 00:46:34.239
<v Speaker 2>is a universal now. Like as I'm speaking these words,

920
00:46:34.360 --> 00:46:37.480
<v Speaker 2>right at this exact second, of volcano is erupting on

921
00:46:37.599 --> 00:46:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Jupiter's moonisle, and a star is going supernova in the

922
00:46:41.440 --> 00:46:44.719
<v Speaker 2>Andromeda galaxy, and all of those events are happening in

923
00:46:44.760 --> 00:46:48.960
<v Speaker 2>the exact same present slice of time that I'm currently experiencing.

924
00:46:49.159 --> 00:46:52.079
<v Speaker 3>That is Newtonian time. It's the belief in a cosmic

925
00:46:52.159 --> 00:46:55.960
<v Speaker 3>now that slices uniformly across the entire universe. But if

926
00:46:55.960 --> 00:46:58.320
<v Speaker 3>time is relative, if the rate of clocks depends on

927
00:46:58.360 --> 00:47:01.559
<v Speaker 3>motion and gravity, then the concept of a synchronized universal

928
00:47:01.559 --> 00:47:03.719
<v Speaker 3>present cannot mathematically exist.

929
00:47:03.480 --> 00:47:06.639
<v Speaker 2>Because two observers can completely disagree on the timeline of

930
00:47:06.639 --> 00:47:07.920
<v Speaker 2>events exactly.

931
00:47:08.519 --> 00:47:13.719
<v Speaker 3>Relativity introduces the concept of the relativity of simultaneity. Imagine

932
00:47:13.760 --> 00:47:16.400
<v Speaker 3>you are floating in space and you see two distant

933
00:47:16.400 --> 00:47:20.000
<v Speaker 3>stars explode at the exact same time. To you, those

934
00:47:20.039 --> 00:47:24.519
<v Speaker 3>events are perfectly simultaneous, but another observer flying past. You

935
00:47:24.599 --> 00:47:27.119
<v Speaker 3>in a spaceship at high velocity toward one star and

936
00:47:27.159 --> 00:47:29.239
<v Speaker 3>away from the other, will see the light from the

937
00:47:29.239 --> 00:47:33.679
<v Speaker 3>approaching star first to them. The explosions were not simultaneous.

938
00:47:33.920 --> 00:47:36.960
<v Speaker 3>One clearly happened before the other, and because.

939
00:47:36.679 --> 00:47:39.760
<v Speaker 2>There's no preferred reference frame, neither observer is wrong.

940
00:47:40.119 --> 00:47:43.159
<v Speaker 3>Neither is wrong. If observers cannot agree on whether two

941
00:47:43.159 --> 00:47:45.920
<v Speaker 3>events happened at the same time, then it is physically

942
00:47:45.960 --> 00:47:48.920
<v Speaker 3>impossible to draw a single objective line across the universe

943
00:47:48.960 --> 00:47:52.000
<v Speaker 3>and call it now. Your now is entirely local to

944
00:47:52.079 --> 00:47:54.599
<v Speaker 3>your specific velocity and gravitational field.

945
00:47:54.719 --> 00:47:59.079
<v Speaker 2>If the universal present doesn't exist, what replaces it? How

946
00:47:59.119 --> 00:48:01.880
<v Speaker 2>do physicists vision ualize reality if it isn't a series

947
00:48:01.920 --> 00:48:03.719
<v Speaker 2>of universal moments clicking forward.

948
00:48:04.119 --> 00:48:07.239
<v Speaker 3>Many physicists are led by the equations of general relativity

949
00:48:07.239 --> 00:48:10.400
<v Speaker 3>to a concept known as the block universe or eternalism.

950
00:48:10.800 --> 00:48:13.599
<v Speaker 3>It requires abandoning the idea of time flowing entirely.

951
00:48:14.000 --> 00:48:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Explain the block universe? How should I picture it?

952
00:48:16.679 --> 00:48:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Imagine a massive solid block of transparent amber, But instead

953
00:48:21.440 --> 00:48:25.719
<v Speaker 3>of just representing the three dimensions of space up, down, left, right, forward, backward,

954
00:48:26.320 --> 00:48:31.440
<v Speaker 3>this block also contains time as a physical structural fourth dimension.

955
00:48:32.199 --> 00:48:35.639
<v Speaker 3>In the block universe model, every single moment that has

956
00:48:35.960 --> 00:48:39.639
<v Speaker 3>happened and every single moment that ever will happen, exists

957
00:48:39.639 --> 00:48:41.960
<v Speaker 3>simultaneously within this eternal block.

958
00:48:42.159 --> 00:48:45.519
<v Speaker 2>So the past hasn't vanished into nothingness and the future

959
00:48:45.559 --> 00:48:49.639
<v Speaker 2>is in some blank, unwritten void. They're just physical locations

960
00:48:49.639 --> 00:48:50.639
<v Speaker 2>within the block.

961
00:48:50.480 --> 00:48:53.079
<v Speaker 3>Precisely, think about space. Just because you are sitting in

962
00:48:53.119 --> 00:48:55.440
<v Speaker 3>London does not mean that Tokyo has ceased to exist

963
00:48:55.559 --> 00:48:57.360
<v Speaker 3>or that New York hasn't been built yet. They all

964
00:48:57.400 --> 00:48:59.960
<v Speaker 3>exist simultaneously. You just happen to be located at it

965
00:49:00.079 --> 00:49:03.800
<v Speaker 3>specific coordinate. In the block universe, time works exactly the

966
00:49:03.800 --> 00:49:06.760
<v Speaker 3>same way. The year nineteen twenty, the year you were born,

967
00:49:06.960 --> 00:49:08.920
<v Speaker 3>the present moment you were listening to my voice, and

968
00:49:08.920 --> 00:49:12.840
<v Speaker 3>the year thirty twenty all exists simultaneously, permanently etched into

969
00:49:12.880 --> 00:49:14.719
<v Speaker 3>the fabric of four dimensional space time.

970
00:49:15.079 --> 00:49:17.920
<v Speaker 2>There's a quote from the brilliant physicist term and while

971
00:49:18.000 --> 00:49:20.880
<v Speaker 2>that always gives me chills when thinking about this, he wrote,

972
00:49:21.000 --> 00:49:23.920
<v Speaker 2>the objective world simply is it does not happen.

973
00:49:24.199 --> 00:49:27.920
<v Speaker 3>It does not happen. It is a profound summation in

974
00:49:27.960 --> 00:49:30.719
<v Speaker 3>the block universe, the Big Bang, the construction of the pyramids,

975
00:49:30.760 --> 00:49:32.880
<v Speaker 3>your entire life, and the eventual heat death of the

976
00:49:32.960 --> 00:49:37.039
<v Speaker 3>universe are all just static structures embedded in the block.

977
00:49:37.800 --> 00:49:41.239
<v Speaker 3>The flow of time, that visceral, unshakable feeling we all

978
00:49:41.280 --> 00:49:44.599
<v Speaker 3>have of a moving present, of sliding relentlessly from the

979
00:49:44.639 --> 00:49:47.639
<v Speaker 3>past into the open future might not be a physical

980
00:49:47.679 --> 00:49:49.159
<v Speaker 3>property of the universe at all.

981
00:49:49.280 --> 00:49:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Wait, if the universe is static, why do I feel

982
00:49:51.400 --> 00:49:54.000
<v Speaker 2>like time is passing? Why do I remember yesterday but

983
00:49:54.119 --> 00:49:54.719
<v Speaker 2>not tomorrow?

984
00:49:54.800 --> 00:49:58.719
<v Speaker 3>The flow of time might simply be a subjective psychological illusion,

985
00:49:59.159 --> 00:50:02.599
<v Speaker 3>a biological trick. Our brains evolve to process a static

986
00:50:02.719 --> 00:50:06.400
<v Speaker 3>four dimensional reality one thin three dimensional slice at a time.

987
00:50:06.920 --> 00:50:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Consciousness acts like a spotlight dragging slowly across the solid

988
00:50:10.360 --> 00:50:13.400
<v Speaker 3>block of amber, illuminating one slice of space time and

989
00:50:13.400 --> 00:50:15.480
<v Speaker 3>calling it now before moving to the next.

990
00:50:15.840 --> 00:50:19.599
<v Speaker 2>That is a deeply unsettling conclusion, because if the block

991
00:50:19.679 --> 00:50:22.320
<v Speaker 2>universe is real and the future is already sitting there

992
00:50:22.360 --> 00:50:25.119
<v Speaker 2>in the amber, what happens to free will? If my

993
00:50:25.239 --> 00:50:29.079
<v Speaker 2>choices tomorrow are already structurally embedded in the space time block,

994
00:50:29.280 --> 00:50:31.519
<v Speaker 2>am I actually making choices? Or am I just a

995
00:50:31.519 --> 00:50:34.280
<v Speaker 2>needle on a record player experiencing a song that has

996
00:50:34.280 --> 00:50:35.599
<v Speaker 2>already been pressed into vinyl.

997
00:50:35.760 --> 00:50:38.000
<v Speaker 3>You've hit on exactly why this is one of the

998
00:50:38.000 --> 00:50:42.320
<v Speaker 3>most fiercely debated metaphysical topics in science. We must be clear,

999
00:50:43.199 --> 00:50:46.440
<v Speaker 3>while the mathematics of relativity heavily imply the block universe,

1000
00:50:46.920 --> 00:50:50.239
<v Speaker 3>it is not universally accepted as the definitive truth of reality.

1001
00:50:50.599 --> 00:50:54.800
<v Speaker 3>There is significant pushback from both physicists and philosophers, so.

1002
00:50:54.800 --> 00:50:58.440
<v Speaker 2>The science doesn't mandate the exidential dread just yet. What

1003
00:50:58.599 --> 00:51:00.079
<v Speaker 2>is the counter argument on.

1004
00:51:00.000 --> 00:51:03.159
<v Speaker 3>Our question is whether the physics of relativity strictly dictates

1005
00:51:03.199 --> 00:51:06.760
<v Speaker 3>the metaphysics of existence. Proponents of eternalism argue that the

1006
00:51:06.800 --> 00:51:10.639
<v Speaker 3>relativity of simultaneity leaves no other logical option. If different

1007
00:51:10.679 --> 00:51:14.239
<v Speaker 3>observers have different nows that include events in another observer's

1008
00:51:14.280 --> 00:51:17.480
<v Speaker 3>past or future, all those events must be equally real.

1009
00:51:17.719 --> 00:51:20.400
<v Speaker 2>And the opponents the people who still believe time is

1010
00:51:20.440 --> 00:51:21.280
<v Speaker 2>actively slowing.

1011
00:51:21.480 --> 00:51:24.920
<v Speaker 3>They fall into camps like presentism or the growing block theory.

1012
00:51:25.559 --> 00:51:29.000
<v Speaker 3>They argue that the mathematical equations of relativity are just

1013
00:51:29.239 --> 00:51:33.840
<v Speaker 3>that mathematical models for calculating observations. They argue the math

1014
00:51:34.079 --> 00:51:39.880
<v Speaker 3>underdetermines the metaphysics. In their view, relativity is completely compatible

1015
00:51:39.880 --> 00:51:42.840
<v Speaker 3>with a dynamic universe where the present is an objectively

1016
00:51:42.960 --> 00:51:47.400
<v Speaker 3>real moving boundary that actively brings the future into existence.

1017
00:51:48.079 --> 00:51:51.280
<v Speaker 3>The fact that different observers measure that boundary differently due

1018
00:51:51.280 --> 00:51:54.239
<v Speaker 3>to light speed delays and reference frames doesn't mean the

1019
00:51:54.280 --> 00:51:55.800
<v Speaker 3>boundary itself is an illusion.

1020
00:51:56.280 --> 00:51:59.320
<v Speaker 2>So we have built a flawless mathematical apparatus that allows

1021
00:51:59.400 --> 00:52:03.199
<v Speaker 2>us to sink satellite networks to the microsecond and predict

1022
00:52:03.239 --> 00:52:06.519
<v Speaker 2>the exact decay rates of subatomic particles. But at the

1023
00:52:06.599 --> 00:52:08.480
<v Speaker 2>very bottom of the rabbit hole, the greatest minds in

1024
00:52:08.519 --> 00:52:11.159
<v Speaker 2>the world are still arguing about whether tomorrow has already

1025
00:52:11.159 --> 00:52:12.119
<v Speaker 2>happened exactly.

1026
00:52:12.159 --> 00:52:15.920
<v Speaker 3>It perfectly bridges the intense, rigorous technical precision of physics

1027
00:52:16.159 --> 00:52:20.239
<v Speaker 3>with the grandest, most unanswerable questions of philosophy. Equations can

1028
00:52:20.239 --> 00:52:23.440
<v Speaker 3>calculate the time dilation of a muon, but equations cannot

1029
00:52:23.440 --> 00:52:26.639
<v Speaker 3>definitively answer the nature of conscious experience or the existence

1030
00:52:26.679 --> 00:52:27.239
<v Speaker 3>of free will.

1031
00:52:27.480 --> 00:52:31.079
<v Speaker 2>To bring this massive journey all together, Albert Einstein looked

1032
00:52:31.079 --> 00:52:34.599
<v Speaker 2>at a universe that seemed chaotic and full of contradictions,

1033
00:52:34.639 --> 00:52:38.280
<v Speaker 2>like light refusing to behave like a throne baseball, and

1034
00:52:38.360 --> 00:52:42.400
<v Speaker 2>he brought an elegant, unbreakable mathematical order to it, but

1035
00:52:42.519 --> 00:52:44.840
<v Speaker 2>the price we had to pay for that mathematical order

1036
00:52:45.199 --> 00:52:47.079
<v Speaker 2>with the destruction of our common sense.

1037
00:52:47.400 --> 00:52:49.960
<v Speaker 3>He proved that the universe does not care about human intuition.

1038
00:52:50.079 --> 00:52:53.000
<v Speaker 3>It does not have a single master clock taking away

1039
00:52:53.000 --> 00:52:56.320
<v Speaker 3>in the background. As the science of time dilation proves

1040
00:52:56.360 --> 00:53:00.519
<v Speaker 3>with absolute tested certainty, the universe possesses exactly as many

1041
00:53:00.519 --> 00:53:03.920
<v Speaker 3>clocks as there are places, gravitational fields, and states of motion.

1042
00:53:04.599 --> 00:53:08.679
<v Speaker 3>Every single object, every planet, every rocket ship, every individual person,

1043
00:53:08.880 --> 00:53:12.519
<v Speaker 3>every single atom faithfully keeps its own unique time, and

1044
00:53:12.559 --> 00:53:15.840
<v Speaker 3>that time accelerates or drags, depending entirely on the curvature

1045
00:53:15.880 --> 00:53:17.119
<v Speaker 3>of space. Time it navigates.

1046
00:53:17.480 --> 00:53:20.320
<v Speaker 2>The universe keeps its own decentralized ledgers, and the math

1047
00:53:20.360 --> 00:53:22.320
<v Speaker 2>allows for two people to look at the exact same

1048
00:53:22.320 --> 00:53:25.480
<v Speaker 2>beam of light, experience a completely different flow of reality,

1049
00:53:25.719 --> 00:53:29.280
<v Speaker 2>biologically age at different rates, and both be one hundred

1050
00:53:29.280 --> 00:53:31.079
<v Speaker 2>percent perfectly correct in their measurements.

1051
00:53:31.320 --> 00:53:34.679
<v Speaker 3>Einstein himself once remarked that the most incomprehensible thing about

1052
00:53:34.679 --> 00:53:39.119
<v Speaker 3>the universe is that it is comprehensible. Time dilation embodies

1053
00:53:39.119 --> 00:53:43.760
<v Speaker 3>that paradox perfectly. It violently violates every ordinary assumption we

1054
00:53:43.880 --> 00:53:48.559
<v Speaker 3>possess about the universality of seconds, minutes, and years. Yet

1055
00:53:48.599 --> 00:53:52.039
<v Speaker 3>we can derive it from simple geometric principles, confirm it

1056
00:53:52.079 --> 00:53:54.840
<v Speaker 3>by flying atomic clocks around the globe, and apply it

1057
00:53:54.880 --> 00:53:58.639
<v Speaker 3>with astonishing engineering precision to a satellite network that guides

1058
00:53:58.719 --> 00:53:59.719
<v Speaker 3>us to the grocery store.

1059
00:54:00.079 --> 00:54:02.679
<v Speaker 2>The cosmos doesn't owe us a reality that makes sense

1060
00:54:02.719 --> 00:54:06.159
<v Speaker 2>to our primate brains. It operates on its own magnificent,

1061
00:54:06.280 --> 00:54:07.440
<v Speaker 2>warped logic.

1062
00:54:07.280 --> 00:54:09.639
<v Speaker 3>And the ultimate task of science is to follow the

1063
00:54:09.679 --> 00:54:12.599
<v Speaker 3>experimental evidence wherever it leads, even when it demands that

1064
00:54:12.599 --> 00:54:16.199
<v Speaker 3>we abandon the deepest, most comforting illusions we hold about reality.

1065
00:54:16.480 --> 00:54:18.000
<v Speaker 2>So as we wrap up, I want you to look

1066
00:54:18.039 --> 00:54:19.519
<v Speaker 2>back at the clock on your wall, the one we

1067
00:54:19.559 --> 00:54:23.280
<v Speaker 2>started this entire conversation with. It is still ticking, and

1068
00:54:23.320 --> 00:54:26.159
<v Speaker 2>it's keeping perfectly good, accurate time for you, right in

1069
00:54:26.239 --> 00:54:29.440
<v Speaker 2>the specific chair you're sitting in. But remember what it

1070
00:54:29.559 --> 00:54:32.480
<v Speaker 2>is actually doing. It is keeping its own local time.

1071
00:54:32.719 --> 00:54:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Nothing absolutely nowhere in the vastness of the cosmos is

1072
00:54:36.119 --> 00:54:37.679
<v Speaker 2>keeping universal time.

1073
00:54:37.599 --> 00:54:41.079
<v Speaker 3>Which leaves us with a truly mind expanding, somewhat haunting

1074
00:54:41.199 --> 00:54:44.599
<v Speaker 3>question to ponder. We discussed how the flow of time

1075
00:54:44.719 --> 00:54:48.400
<v Speaker 3>might simply be a psychological trick, a biological mechanism our

1076
00:54:48.440 --> 00:54:52.079
<v Speaker 3>brains evolve to navigate the static four dimensional block of

1077
00:54:52.079 --> 00:54:55.760
<v Speaker 3>space time. But try to imagine a perspective outside of that.

1078
00:54:55.760 --> 00:54:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Limitation, outside the human experience.

1079
00:54:58.119 --> 00:55:01.119
<v Speaker 3>Right, what would reality look like to a consciousness that

1080
00:55:01.360 --> 00:55:05.119
<v Speaker 3>wasn't bound by that evolutionary trick. If a hyper advanced

1081
00:55:05.199 --> 00:55:09.199
<v Speaker 3>artificial intelligence or some radically different, higher dimensional biological entity

1082
00:55:09.559 --> 00:55:13.840
<v Speaker 3>could somehow perceive all four dimensions of space time simultaneously,

1083
00:55:14.199 --> 00:55:16.159
<v Speaker 3>able to see the very beginning of your life and

1084
00:55:16.199 --> 00:55:19.960
<v Speaker 3>the absolute end of it in a single, unified, eternal glance,

1085
00:55:20.079 --> 00:55:23.840
<v Speaker 3>that's a huge thought. Would they even recognize us as living, conscious,

1086
00:55:23.880 --> 00:55:27.079
<v Speaker 3>thinking beings or would human lives just look to them

1087
00:55:27.119 --> 00:55:31.400
<v Speaker 3>like static, unchanging elongated shapes frizen forever in the solid

1088
00:55:31.440 --> 00:55:32.440
<v Speaker 3>amber of space time.

1089
00:56:00.119 --> 00:56:54.079
<v Speaker 4>The Days Das School
