Speaker 1: The following presentation Isndel Marvis Studio's production.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the fact Hunter Radio Network.
Speaker 1: Here is your host, George Hobbs.
Speaker 3: Welcome back truth seekers from around the world. It's time
Speaker 3: for another edition of the fact Hunter podcast as we
Speaker 3: record on this Monday, December second, twenty twenty four. I
Speaker 3: hope everybody had a wonderful Thanksgiving weekend. We certainly did.
Speaker 3: It was great to see family, a little bit of traveling,
Speaker 3: a little bit of bowling, just a very nice weekend.
Speaker 3: And it's already Monday, and new week ahead of us
Speaker 3: and more topics to tackle. Of course, this Thursday, our
Speaker 3: radio show goes to two hours. We hope you can
Speaker 3: catch it live. We'll be back on Rumble this week
Speaker 3: and of course radiosoapbox dot com. That is noon Eastern
Speaker 3: time every Thursday from noon to now two pm Eastern Time.
Speaker 3: An hour or two, we will be opening up the
Speaker 3: phone line, so if you'd like to join us, you
Speaker 3: can be part of the program. Next week, next Tuesday,
Speaker 3: December tenth, our episode will be focused on the George
Speaker 3: Floyd sy up. Right, there's a big difference between a
Speaker 3: sy up and a hoax. Okay, this was something that
Speaker 3: was manipulated to entice a certain emotion out of people
Speaker 3: to be divisive in a year that was already divisive. Right,
Speaker 3: and twenty twenty, man, I'll tell you, you know, I've
Speaker 3: been on this earth for fifty five years, and I
Speaker 3: have never seen a year quite like it, right, you know,
Speaker 3: Obviously two thousand and one was a game changer, something
Speaker 3: that we could never imagine that we would see in
Speaker 3: our lifetime. But twenty twenty, and you know, I've had
Speaker 3: a lot of conversations with list friends, people in the
Speaker 3: truth community, and they believe that now, you know, sometime
Speaker 3: between now twenty thirty, we are going to see something
Speaker 3: to the likes of that kind of the endgame, right,
Speaker 3: the New World Order finally taking their place on the stage.
Speaker 3: But I'd love to hear your thoughts on what went
Speaker 3: down with what we call the Summer of Love in
Speaker 3: twenty twenty and the George Floyd sigh up, the thing
Speaker 3: that kicked off, you know, chop in Seattle and Portland
Speaker 3: and Saint Louis and you know, the infamous man and
Speaker 3: woman standing in front of their match their mansions with
Speaker 3: their M four's or AR fifteen's, whatever it was that
Speaker 3: summer again in an already divisive year, just divide and conquered.
Speaker 3: You could feel it anytime you went out, right. So
Speaker 3: we're going to delve deep into that topic, and I'm
Speaker 3: talking about all aspects of it. Chauvin Floyd, the people
Speaker 3: who benefited, another way to get rid of small businesses.
Speaker 3: You know how many small businesses were destroyed during those riots,
Speaker 3: and who bought the property back. There's so much to it.
Speaker 3: And people who were on the world stage in twenty
Speaker 3: twenty back on the world stage in twenty twenty four.
Speaker 3: If you're a part of the club, you get rewarded
Speaker 3: for doing your part. And Tim Waltz certainly, you know,
Speaker 3: while they didn't put him all the way up, he
Speaker 3: was introduced even more and he will certainly be a
Speaker 3: part of the world stage in the coming years to come.
Speaker 3: So again i'd love to hear your thoughts, and again
Speaker 3: the most interesting one or two emails I'll share with
Speaker 3: the audience. So as you sign your email, sign it
Speaker 3: how you would like it read on the air, whether
Speaker 3: it's just your first name or anonymous, whatever the case
Speaker 3: may be. I guess the biggest news to come out
Speaker 3: since we last met was of course this broke I
Speaker 3: think last night around eight pm and per our friend
Speaker 3: Lee Man at US Crime Review, Biden has issued a
Speaker 3: blanket pardon to his son. Listen to this for any
Speaker 3: and all crimes he committed or participated in during the
Speaker 3: last ten years, whether currently charged or not. So something
Speaker 3: surfaces that he was involved with trafficking in twenty eighteen,
Speaker 3: he has his get out of free cart right. It
Speaker 3: is patently absurd to believe that the pardon authority extends
Speaker 3: to such an act. Right, no saying allegedly ratifying the
Speaker 3: Constitution would have ever agreed to grant to such a
Speaker 3: power that a president or anyone else right could just
Speaker 3: have this blanket authority. And that's why I keep going
Speaker 3: back in the older I get the more I understand,
Speaker 3: you know these documents, and you know, we're supposed to
Speaker 3: be this democratic republic, but we're still very much a
Speaker 3: monarchy because the ruling powers have not just special privileges.
Speaker 3: That's an understatement to be able to just completely absolve
Speaker 3: your friends and business partners of their actions and understand
Speaker 3: that if you or I did the things that Hunter
Speaker 3: Biden did, we'd be in jail. You know how they
Speaker 3: say life plus one hundred and fifty years, because in
Speaker 3: some states life sentence is twenty five years and then
Speaker 3: you have the opportunity for parole. But this guy has
Speaker 3: done some horrific things, his family has no morals, and
Speaker 3: once again it is rules for thee but not for me. Right,
Speaker 3: so the opportunity unity for abuse is open and obvious.
Speaker 3: We're supposed to believe people who just fought off a
Speaker 3: monarchy granted the president the power to pardon his own
Speaker 3: son for any and all crimes he may or may
Speaker 3: not have committed in the past ten years. Why not
Speaker 3: his whole life?
Speaker 4: Right?
Speaker 3: Why not pardon anyone whoever donated money to his campaign
Speaker 3: right of any and all crimes they've ever committed during
Speaker 3: their lives. Does he have that power too? Was that
Speaker 3: also something that the people, we the people agreed to.
Speaker 3: It's a joke, and it's more than clear that there
Speaker 3: is no limit to what the people will continue to
Speaker 3: swallow from this corrupt government under the guise of this
Speaker 3: stupid constitution scam. And that's what it is. Here's your freedoms,
Speaker 3: it's documented right here on paper. But every time you
Speaker 3: go to the airport, the constitution is destroyed. Every time
Speaker 3: the FBI listens in on you or the NSA listens
Speaker 3: on you, they don't care about that. So again, you know,
Speaker 3: they tell you you're free, but we don't have the
Speaker 3: freedoms that are guaranteed to us in the Constitution. That's
Speaker 3: just it's a scam. It truly is a scam. So
Speaker 3: that's our thoughts on Hunter Biden. There is two stories
Speaker 3: I want to talk about before we jump in. Two,
Speaker 3: Planned parenthood and the evil eugenics slash abortion agenda. I
Speaker 3: found this interesting article.
Speaker 4: This was.
Speaker 3: In a United States Department of Education. Once again, I
Speaker 3: thought we were closing it down. Apparently they named Linda McMahon,
Speaker 3: the wife of WWE owner or I guess he used
Speaker 3: to own it. He doesn't anymore, Vince McMahon. All the
Speaker 3: world's a stage, right, But they have been unfairly targeting
Speaker 3: Christian universities and colleges. So out of all of the
Speaker 3: fines and penalties given to college and universities, seventy percent
Speaker 3: of them have targeted Christian universities and colleges, despite making
Speaker 3: up a disproportionately small percentage of the schools. According to
Speaker 3: this report by the American Principles Project, built is the
Speaker 3: premier national organization engaging directly in campaigns and advocacy on
Speaker 3: behalf of the family. The APP found that since assuming office,
Speaker 3: the current administration has waged an unprecedented assault against Christian colleges, universities,
Speaker 3: and students, while systematically protecting elite public and price institutions,
Speaker 3: foisting woke ideology on reluctant students, and enabling violent protests
Speaker 3: on campuses around the nation. And this war, it is
Speaker 3: exactly that. Again. They'll tell you where a Christian nation,
Speaker 3: But many, many of the laws, including today's main topic,
Speaker 3: go against the Bible. That's where they want you to
Speaker 3: believe the constitution. But this is the Doe's Office of Enforcement,
Speaker 3: which is an obscure agency created under the Obama and
Speaker 3: resurrected by Biden, whose goal is to shut down colleges
Speaker 3: and their universities that don't align with the administration's woke agenda.
Speaker 3: Their tactics include imposing massive penalties against leading institutions, harassed
Speaker 3: schools operating in good faith with scrutinize and find investigations,
Speaker 3: and then cutting off This is the big one. What
Speaker 3: they're doing is they're cutting off and even threatening colleges
Speaker 3: and universities to funding. The report also found that the
Speaker 3: Department of Education imposed record finds against two of the
Speaker 3: nation's most prominent Christian universities, Grand Canyon Universities, with fines
Speaker 3: that totaled close to forty million dollars and the Liberty
Speaker 3: University fourteen million dollars. And these finds total more than
Speaker 3: all other penalties the DOE assessed over the past seven years.
Speaker 3: So again, and a lot of these things come from, oh,
Speaker 3: you don't have transgender bathrooms, you don't have access to this.
Speaker 3: It's you know, universities that stand up, these Christian universities
Speaker 3: that stand up to woke ideology, and they get threatened.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 3: Okay, if you're not going to come through this, then
Speaker 3: we're going to shut you down. We're going to close
Speaker 3: your funding. And that is what you continue to see
Speaker 3: in the entire Department of Education. Oh, Delaware, Rhode Island, Michigan.
Speaker 3: You want your funding, you have to align with this,
Speaker 3: this and this, and much of those things do not
Speaker 3: align with Christian ideology. Okay. Over the last ten years,
Speaker 3: the Department of Education has issued nearly seventy fines for
Speaker 3: Clary Act violations, totaling twenty seven and a half million
Speaker 3: in penalties. Twenty five finds more than a quarter were
Speaker 3: against Christian colleges and university. The average fine against a
Speaker 3: Christian school was over eight hundred thousand, compared to twenty
Speaker 3: five against public and private institution, and nearly seventy percent
Speaker 3: of all penalties imposed by the Office of Enforcement have
Speaker 3: been against Christian institutions. So again, when we talk about
Speaker 3: any particular rabbit hole that has been the point been
Speaker 3: trying to get across, it is not any singular you know,
Speaker 3: people want to blame it on whoever, you know, whatever
Speaker 3: faction or religion or freemasonry or this or that. At
Speaker 3: the end of the day, they all fall under Satan
Speaker 3: and the war against God. That's what all this is about.
Speaker 3: And the Bible tells you, you know, you can expect,
Speaker 3: you know, what we get for speaking his word. And
Speaker 3: we already talked about Biden next that. So yeah, we're
Speaker 3: just going to jump in to today's podcast and again
Speaker 3: it is you know, we're going to talk about planned
Speaker 3: parenthood Margaret Sanger, which we have in the past. I
Speaker 3: think maybe two years ago, could be a little further
Speaker 3: back than that, but this is certainly a topic that
Speaker 3: deserves not just another look, but at least, you know,
Speaker 3: a few times a year.
Speaker 4: This is to me.
Speaker 3: You know again, we say we're a Christian nation, but
Speaker 3: we allow this within our borders, and it's abhorrent. And
Speaker 3: I wanted to preface all of this with a great
Speaker 3: article that John Watkins wrote seven years ago. And we've
Speaker 3: said this many times. The Luciferians tell us what they're
Speaker 3: going to do ahead of time, and they always do
Speaker 3: it under the guise of good and plant parenthood and
Speaker 3: reproductive rights and pro choice. Words have meaning, and they
Speaker 3: create these words to take the true effect off of
Speaker 3: what is actually going on. Lindsey Williams said, one of
Speaker 3: the first things I learned about the elites is that
Speaker 3: they have a code of ethics. Right. We've said this before.
Speaker 3: Their code of ethics is not the same as us. Right,
Speaker 3: we believe the word of God in the Bible. One
Speaker 3: of the facets of their code of ethics is that
Speaker 3: they must tell the world everything that they're going to
Speaker 3: do before they do it, right, and that's where these
Speaker 3: buzzwords come in. Right, But they do it via Hollywood
Speaker 3: contagion events, clade X. We've spoken about event to a one,
Speaker 3: and my goodness, how many Simpson episodes had predicted these
Speaker 3: things predictive programming. But the elite's belief system and their
Speaker 3: values go back to social Darwinism. So they believe that
Speaker 3: they're a more advanced form of human in order to
Speaker 3: justify their beliefs that, you know, they grafted Darwin's theories
Speaker 3: of biological evolution onto societal organization to create this social Darwinism.
Speaker 3: So over the centuries they've referred to the public as
Speaker 3: cattle as sheep, and it's right, just as Plato did
Speaker 3: in the Republic. And the social Darwinism is merely the
Speaker 3: modern expression of this attitude and their elitist belief right,
Speaker 3: they've raised their nose to us. They loathe us, They
Speaker 3: truly low us. We are utilizing you know their you
Speaker 3: know their items, you know their water, their food. Right.
Speaker 3: But under this belief system, only those who have proven
Speaker 3: their worth over many generations of dominance and control are
Speaker 3: worthy of entrance into high elite circles. Right, even the
Speaker 3: people on the world stage or tailor swifts and those
Speaker 3: type of people, they're not in the know. Right, They're
Speaker 3: rewarded for portraying a message and keeping people distracted from
Speaker 3: the real problems in the world, and they're rewarded handsomely.
Speaker 3: But by no way, shape or form of these people
Speaker 3: part of the club. This is generational bloodline stuff who
Speaker 3: are truly part of the club. And then you know
Speaker 3: they talk about, you know, our topic of today, which
Speaker 3: is eugenics and what they call selective breeding. Right, that's
Speaker 3: why so many of these families marry in family. But
Speaker 3: the elite, throughout history and supportive belief in their own
Speaker 3: superiority over the common person, have practiced interbreeding among themselves.
Speaker 3: So they do this to prove intelligence, to preserve intelligence, pardon,
Speaker 3: love of power, and above all the ruthlessness and willingness
Speaker 3: to kill as required. And I know when we have
Speaker 3: conversations with their family and friends, specifically when you talk
Speaker 3: about nine to eleven, they say, there's no way somebody
Speaker 3: could just elect that to happen. Yeah, they're not the
Speaker 3: same they didn't grow up like us. They're not the
Speaker 3: same people. They don't have that switch. But they still
Speaker 3: practice this today and along similar lines, they believe in
Speaker 3: and practice of eugenics on the public to control right
Speaker 3: population control, to control the population, and to make them
Speaker 3: more docile, controlled, stupid, and compliant. Having been exposed to
Speaker 3: all the atrocities of the elite, went underground. Right Eugenics
Speaker 3: qortally used to have a magazine. This stuff is out there.
Speaker 3: Then there's the psycho psychopathy among elites. But this is
Speaker 3: not a belief, but more of a sobering fact that
Speaker 3: must be considered when evaluating the values and actions of
Speaker 3: the elite. It has been well established, as shown by
Speaker 3: Andrew Labachowski in his book Political Poneurology and Cell Phone Spy,
Speaker 3: that the elite and those that are most capable of
Speaker 3: rising to the top of a system based on money
Speaker 3: are psychopathic. This includes leaders in all centers of power,
Speaker 3: including both business and politics. Understand that these psychopaths have
Speaker 3: no conscience, they're lust for power and control, are literally
Speaker 3: capable of anything, and they have no problem sleeping at
Speaker 3: night because, according to them, the ends justify the means. Right,
Speaker 3: because the elite truly believe that the ends justifies the means,
Speaker 3: and the fact that they are for the most part
Speaker 3: psycho pathic, they have absolutely no problem lying to the public.
Speaker 3: This is also known as the ethics of war, where
Speaker 3: the only morally abhorrent act of war is losing, and
Speaker 3: they we know they supply both sides of war, so
Speaker 3: it's when they're guaranteed to win either way. And then
Speaker 3: of course there's the mystery religions, the occult, the symbolisms,
Speaker 3: the ancient symbols used thousands of years ago can still
Speaker 3: be seen on your dollar bill and in the city
Speaker 3: of DC. It's all over the place. And then to
Speaker 3: use collectivism as social control. After experimenting for hundreds of
Speaker 3: years with different forms of social organization, the elite have
Speaker 3: concluded that collectivism is the best form of social control.
Speaker 3: So for this reason, and according to our good friends
Speaker 3: at the United Nations, and we've heard certain world leaders
Speaker 3: like even Trump commend China totalitarian China is considered the
Speaker 3: model state for the future, which means that's basically what
Speaker 3: they hope our country will become in the very near future.
Speaker 3: But again, overpopulation, going back to our topic today, the
Speaker 3: elites have long viewed a rising population as a threat
Speaker 3: to their dominance. So they realized that eventually a large
Speaker 3: number of people will inevitably overthrow and remove them from power.
Speaker 3: That's why they constantly have to come up with schemes
Speaker 3: to dividing conquerors. So we're down here arguing about meaningless things,
Speaker 3: and they're at the top laughing at us, charging us
Speaker 3: thirty percent interest and taxes and all of this other
Speaker 3: stuff that are really causing us to work, you know,
Speaker 3: until we're seventy years old, to be able to survive
Speaker 3: the matrix. So they're particularly concerned with the middle class.
Speaker 3: And what was their goal in twenty twenty to decimate
Speaker 3: the middle class? Right, they want rulers and serfs, that
Speaker 3: is what they want. They understand that the middle class,
Speaker 3: whose intelligence and capacity to organize, we are the biggest threat. Consequently,
Speaker 3: the elite plan to destroy the middle class and make
Speaker 3: all of the public equally poor, thus incapable of rebelling.
Speaker 3: And we all remember the Georgia guidestones. They want a
Speaker 3: global population of five hundred million. That's a lot of
Speaker 3: million of that's a lot of millions of people's people,
Speaker 3: pardon me to get rid of. And then there is
Speaker 3: the multi generational planning. Right, we've speaken of a we've
Speaker 3: spoken about this at nausea and pardon me, but the
Speaker 3: evolution of society is not something the elite can leave
Speaker 3: to chance. Since society could evolve in thousands of different
Speaker 3: and unpredictable ways. If they were ever to allow this,
Speaker 3: they might lose their control and dominance over us. So
Speaker 3: in order to continue their position as the dominant minority,
Speaker 3: they plan decades and possibly even centuries in advance, and
Speaker 3: that leads us to the revelation of the method. So
Speaker 3: they do tell us, they uphold their moral code, what's
Speaker 3: coming through their books, through their publications, through movies, through televisions,
Speaker 3: from news releases. They tell you what they are doing.
Speaker 3: This is called the relevation a pardon me, the revelation
Speaker 3: of the method. They always tell us in advance what's comeing,
Speaker 3: so you know, if we're too lazy or we lack
Speaker 3: the knowledge to recognize, to recognize it for what it is,
Speaker 3: then you know, they look at it. That's our problem.
Speaker 3: From their point of view, it's also a form of
Speaker 3: ritual mocking of the victim. That's why I always go
Speaker 3: back to Manly p. Hall's you know, only when you
Speaker 3: know the when you can recognize symbolism, when you're able
Speaker 3: to decipher things in movies. Right when you go back
Speaker 3: to the movies pre two thousand and one, there is hundreds,
Speaker 3: if not thousands of hours of predictive programming of what
Speaker 3: was to come. And once we collectively wake everybody up,
Speaker 3: then all of the veils will fall from men's eyes.
Speaker 3: Planned Parenthood, we're going to give you the official narrative.
Speaker 3: The Planned Parenthood Federation of America is an American nonprofit organization. Boy,
Speaker 3: you won't be shocked to find out how much money
Speaker 3: they garner each year. And again, it's all about wordsmithing.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 3: They provide reproductive and sexual healthcare and sexual education in
Speaker 3: the United States and globally. It is a member of
Speaker 3: the International Planned Parenthood Federation.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 3: Planned Parenthood has its roots in Brooklyn, New York, where
Speaker 3: Margaret Sanger opened the first birth control clinic in the
Speaker 3: United States in nineteen sixteen. Sanger founded the American Birth
Speaker 3: Control League in nineteen twenty one, and fourteen years after
Speaker 3: her exitus president. The successor organization became known as Planned
Speaker 3: Parenthood in nineteen forty two. Right, because words have meanings,
Speaker 3: and it was the Christians at that time didn't like
Speaker 3: the Birth Control League words, so they had to Planned
Speaker 3: Parenthood pro choice. Right, they had to soften the blow.
Speaker 3: Plant Parenthood consists of one hundred and fifty nine medical
Speaker 3: and non medical affiliates which operate over six hundred health
Speaker 3: clinics in the United States. It also partners with organizations
Speaker 3: in twelve countries globally. The organization directly provides a variety
Speaker 3: of reproductive health services and sexual education. It contributes to
Speaker 3: research in reproductive technology and advocates for the protection and
Speaker 3: expansion of reproductive rights. Research shows that closures of planted
Speaker 3: parenthood clinics to increases in maternity mortality rates. So it
Speaker 3: is now headquartered in Manhattan Upscale, New York City, and
Speaker 3: we've given you the numbers, and Margaret Sanger is of
Speaker 3: course the key person there. But let's talk a little
Speaker 3: bit about this non profit, right And we have their
Speaker 3: full filing for fiscal year twenty twenty three, and their
Speaker 3: gross receipts were in excess of five hundred and sixty
Speaker 3: million dollars five hundred and sixty million dollars. There are
Speaker 3: twenty thousand, four hundred volunteers that here in the United
Speaker 3: States volunteer for a planned parenthood. They have about eight
Speaker 3: hundred and fifty employees, and they have a lot of money.
Speaker 3: Of course, nonprofits are allowed to restrict showing where they
Speaker 3: receive their money. From. They just put the word restricted
Speaker 3: on there and they're good to go. That's all they
Speaker 3: do is hide where the money comes from. They don't
Speaker 3: really hide where the money goes to. It's basically grants
Speaker 3: to all the local to cover abortion expenditures. Their top
Speaker 3: salaried professional is their president, Alexis mcgil johnson, who rakes
Speaker 3: in a hefty nine hundred thousand plus dollars per year,
Speaker 3: so just under a million dollars. It's a lot of
Speaker 3: money and it serves, you know, the number one rule
Speaker 3: to the Georgia Guidestones keeping the population down right, because
Speaker 3: every time you destroy a life, you're destroying an entire
Speaker 3: family tree, you know, with that person have had children.
Speaker 3: You know, it is a domino effect. And again they've
Speaker 3: turned it into a heroic cause. And if you stand
Speaker 3: against you know, planned parenthood or abortion, you're risking that
Speaker 3: woman's life to have an abortion in a back alley
Speaker 3: in Chicago, right when the truth is, you know, those discussions,
Speaker 3: you know, if the birth is going to cause harm
Speaker 3: to the mother or incest or any of those type
Speaker 3: of things are like zero point one percent of the
Speaker 3: conversation where most people, unfortunately use abortion. As you know,
Speaker 3: birth control for lack of a better word. But again,
Speaker 3: you know, we believe we are a country of mostly
Speaker 3: good people who want to do good. But I think
Speaker 3: we truly lack the courage and we that includes me,
Speaker 3: to stand up to evils because we don't want to
Speaker 3: rock the boat. We don't want to be uncomfortable, we
Speaker 3: don't want to risk going to jail, we don't want
Speaker 3: to risk embarrassing our family, and all these other things.
Speaker 3: And once again, as Christians, we should look past all
Speaker 3: those things and if we see something that is wrong,
Speaker 3: we should put a lot of our time and energy
Speaker 3: into it to stop it. This is an ancient practice
Speaker 3: that goes back thousands of years and people will say, well,
Speaker 3: the Bible doesn't really address well, yeah it does. It
Speaker 3: says anyone that will harm a child should rather be,
Speaker 3: you know, have a millstone tied around their neck and
Speaker 3: tossed in the ocean. And back then that wasn't a
Speaker 3: thought outside of the people who sacrificed Moloch, right nobody.
Speaker 3: That wasn't a thing. Nobody thought of that until the
Speaker 3: Roman Empire got a little crazy. Then you know, you
Speaker 3: had a deformed kid, they'd toss it out in the sun.
Speaker 3: For three days to see if it would survive. You know,
Speaker 3: you look back at the history of this world sixty
Speaker 3: five hundred years. A lot of evil empires, a lot
Speaker 3: of evil people. And you know, we are made in
Speaker 3: the image of God and if we you know, if
Speaker 3: you kill a child, whether it be in the womb
Speaker 3: or out of the womb, you are destroying God's creation.
Speaker 3: And may God have mercy on your soul. And if
Speaker 3: you don't agree with me, that's fine, you know, see
Speaker 3: you next week with a George Floyd episode. But this
Speaker 3: is something that has bothered me for a long time
Speaker 3: and is quite evil. And you know this is where
Speaker 3: you have to get out of well, you know, let's
Speaker 3: reverse roversus way and let's just leave it up to
Speaker 3: the states. No, it's evil. I don't care about the
Speaker 3: state's rules or a constitution. It should not be a thing, period,
Speaker 3: and we need to even forget that word exists. Very
Speaker 3: evil people are responsible for planned parenthood, are responsible for abortion,
Speaker 3: and that includes Margaret Sanger. Right, And where's my notes
Speaker 3: on Margaret Sanger? Oh, here they are. So if you
Speaker 3: don't know, she spent her whole life a birth control activists, right,
Speaker 3: she was married into elites. She wasn't born an elite,
Speaker 3: but she married into in elites, and she was the
Speaker 3: one who popularized or popularized the term birth control. She
Speaker 3: opened the first birth control clinic in the United States
Speaker 3: and again established Planned Parenthood Federation of America. Now. She
Speaker 3: used her writings and speeches primarily to promote her way
Speaker 3: of thinking, her way of thinking, Satan's way of thinking.
Speaker 3: She was prosecuted for her book Family Limitation under the
Speaker 3: Comstock Act in nineteen fourteen, and she feared the consequences
Speaker 3: of her writings, so she fled to Britain until public
Speaker 3: opinion had quieted. She snuck back into the country, and
Speaker 3: Sanger's efforts contributed to several judicial cases that helped legalize
Speaker 3: contraception in the United States. Due to her connection with
Speaker 3: Planned Parenthood, Sanger is frequently criticized by opponents of abortion. Duh,
Speaker 3: it goes without saying. But she was part of all
Speaker 3: those things that the feminist movement, the reproductive right movement, eugenics, horrible,
Speaker 3: horrible human being. We already talked about that again. She
Speaker 3: was born to Irish Catholic parents, atheist, but her big
Speaker 3: thing was social activism. She was you know, if she
Speaker 3: were alive today, she would be one of these AOC
Speaker 3: the squad, those four people, just a lunatic progressive who
Speaker 3: thinks she has all the answers and wants to tell
Speaker 3: you how to live your life. And it's okay, don't
Speaker 3: let a guy tell you. It's you know, it is
Speaker 3: just it's evil, and it is anti biblical. It is
Speaker 3: anti Christ. Right, go to Bible dot com put an Antichrist.
Speaker 3: It just doesn't talk about a guy who's coming in revelation.
Speaker 3: That book is all over the Bible.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 3: If you go against Christ, it is Antichrist. But she
Speaker 3: was a nasty, evil human being. She published a book
Speaker 3: called The Birth Control Review from nineteen seventeen to nineteen
Speaker 3: twenty nine. She was well funded. She strategically, and to
Speaker 3: this day, Planned parent Hood strategically puts these locations in
Speaker 3: low income neighborhoods because they loathe the low income people.
Speaker 3: You know, And we talked about her in great length
Speaker 3: in the last podcast. I don't want to spend too
Speaker 3: much time on it this time, but what I do
Speaker 3: want to talk about is the Gutmacher Institute. So the
Speaker 3: Gutmacher Institute was actually a part of Planned Parenthood until
Speaker 3: two thousand and seven. In two thousand and seven, it's
Speaker 3: split and it has basically become this think tank, right
Speaker 3: if you want to consider it like a CFR, a
Speaker 3: trilateral commission, except on population control. Right, it's another nonprofit
Speaker 3: and geo and again wordsmithing. They improve sexual health and
Speaker 3: expand reproductive rights. Right, And a lot of what they
Speaker 3: do is they research how they can receive funding and
Speaker 3: where they can continuously put these abortion clinics. They put
Speaker 3: money in doctors' pockets to those who recommend abortion. This
Speaker 3: is all Legit doesn't take a lot of effort to
Speaker 3: find this information. But the biggest thing the difference between
Speaker 3: the Gutmacher Institute and Planned Parenthood was Planned Parenthood was
Speaker 3: putting money directly into legislative pockets, right, lobbying if you will. Right.
Speaker 3: So they thought, well, let's break off the Gupmacher Institute.
Speaker 3: How many people will actually take the time to research
Speaker 3: what the Gutmacher Institute is and will let them put
Speaker 3: the money into the pockets of the politicians. And one
Speaker 3: needs to go no further than to look at Alan Gutmacher,
Speaker 3: to whom it was named after. Alan Gutmacher was an
Speaker 3: American obstetrician gynecologists. He served as President of Planned Parenthood
Speaker 3: and VP of the American Eugenics Society, which, by the way,
Speaker 3: did you know the Eugenic Society here in America that
Speaker 3: was formed in nineteen twenty two. It wasn't dissolved until
Speaker 3: twenty nineteen, right before twenty twenty. That's interesting to me.
Speaker 3: But he founded the American Association of Planned Parenthood Physicians
Speaker 3: as a forum for physicians to discuss the birth control
Speaker 3: pill and abortions. He founded the Association for the Study
Speaker 3: of Abortion in nineteen sixty four. And this next one
Speaker 3: is a big red flag. He was a member of
Speaker 3: the Association for Voluntary Sterilization. Now that crew they don't
Speaker 3: get as much money here in the States, however, they
Speaker 3: are all over the place. They're throughout the world. They
Speaker 3: have twenty countries that they operate in throughout Africa, Asia,
Speaker 3: North and South America. They've been around since nineteen thirty seven,
Speaker 3: and they are all about legal sterilization. It's just absurd.
Speaker 3: The Association for Voluntary Sterilization now once again that you
Speaker 3: should know that they change their name in the sixties,
Speaker 3: I think from the Association for Voluntary sterilization because that
Speaker 3: doesn't pass the stiff Dessin twenty twenty four, it is
Speaker 3: now called Engender Health. Right. It used to be called
Speaker 3: the Association for Voluntary Sterilization and it is still around,
Speaker 3: just under a name that nobody would ever recognize or
Speaker 3: raise a flag. Four and Goutmacher was one of the
Speaker 3: signers of the Humanist Manifesto two. It was written in
Speaker 3: nineteen seventy three by Paul Kurtz Edwin Wilson, and it
Speaker 3: was an update to the previous Humanist Manifesto that was
Speaker 3: published in nineteen thirty three, and it talks about its
Speaker 3: rejection of theism deism. They discredit any proof of the afterlight.
Speaker 3: So again, once again, this is antichrist. It is a
Speaker 3: Marxist right. It is some that Karl Marx would be
Speaker 3: very proud of. And if you look at the people
Speaker 3: who were the signatories on the manifesto, they were not
Speaker 3: good people whatsoever. And I probably need to do a
Speaker 3: podcast on that in itself. It's deep and most of
Speaker 3: the people who were signatories on that manifesto Manifesto have
Speaker 3: very close ties to people on the world stage. Isaac Asimov, right,
Speaker 3: he was a writer and professor at Boston University. He
Speaker 3: was considered one of the Big three science fiction writers
Speaker 3: along with Arthur Clark and Robert Heinlein. But this guy
Speaker 3: was all about pushing outer space science fiction and discrediting
Speaker 3: God's work and all these Again, there's many, many people
Speaker 3: who are involved within the signatories the one hundred and twenty.
Speaker 3: I'll have to do a podcast on that sometime. Well,
Speaker 3: let's continue on. Let's start with this article from Brian Fisher,
Speaker 3: and he talks about is it accurate to refer to
Speaker 3: American abortion as genocide?
Speaker 4: Right?
Speaker 3: Because genocide is a strong word. Right, That is a
Speaker 3: mass calling of human beings.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 3: You can't think of a stronger word to be accused of. Right.
Speaker 3: If you're accused of genocide, then you obviously are amongst
Speaker 3: the most evil persons in the world. Well, the general
Speaker 3: definition of genocide is the deliberate killing of a large
Speaker 3: group of people, especially those of a particular fa group
Speaker 3: or nation.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 3: Deliberate killing is how that sentence starts, and elective abortion
Speaker 3: is most certainly deliberate. Right, Sometimes the mother makes the decision,
Speaker 3: although oftentimes the baby's father or another family member coerces
Speaker 3: the decision. Either way, the killing of the child is
Speaker 3: both premeditated and deliberate. Well, a large group of people
Speaker 3: the next part of the sentence, right, Well, how about
Speaker 3: sixty million dead children since nineteen seventy three. I think
Speaker 3: that certainly qualifies as a large group, does it not?
Speaker 3: More so that many genocides in world history? This pro abortion,
Speaker 3: not pro choice. No, no, no, this pro abortion movement
Speaker 3: would vehemently disagree with and in fact, hang there art
Speaker 3: argument on the use of the word people in this definition.
Speaker 3: You see pro abortion advocates claim that human beings inside
Speaker 3: the womb are not people, thus they're disqualified from this definition.
Speaker 3: I've never heard a coherent argument for what a human
Speaker 3: non person might be. Right. You know, does not life start,
Speaker 3: you know, the second of conception? And if you kill
Speaker 3: a child in the womb, you are stopping life. You
Speaker 3: are stamping life out. And you know, we have intrinsic
Speaker 3: and priceless value because we are human, not because of
Speaker 3: any other criteria. We have value because we are members
Speaker 3: of the human race, regardless of our age, level of development,
Speaker 3: degree of dependency, right, physical or mental disability, or whether
Speaker 3: or not some other human being has assigned us the
Speaker 3: rather nebulous concept of personhood, right, And that's once again
Speaker 3: where the state comes in and tells you how you
Speaker 3: should live and what privileges you should live by and
Speaker 3: how much said privileges will cost you per year. So
Speaker 3: let's go back to this. The definition of genocide still
Speaker 3: aptly applies, since preborn humans are full members of the
Speaker 3: human race. If you still aren't sure, then consider that
Speaker 3: when a pregnant woman is murdered, the murderer is generally
Speaker 3: accused of double homicide. HM. You can't have it both
Speaker 3: ways and then the end, especially those of a particular
Speaker 3: ethnic group or nation. So the idea here is that
Speaker 3: genocide is carried out by a group in power against
Speaker 3: a victim group that shares certain characteristics characteristics spart me
Speaker 3: certain traits if you will. In the case of the
Speaker 3: preborn children, common characteristics include their size, their location which
Speaker 3: would be inside their mother's womb age, and vulnerability. So
Speaker 3: abortion in America is thus quite correctly referred to as
Speaker 3: the worst genocide in America in American history. So the
Speaker 3: challenge is we don't always allow ourselves to think of
Speaker 3: abortion in those terms, and our country, well, it certainly
Speaker 3: doesn't act accordingly so the next question begs, why is this?
Speaker 3: Is it because there may be a huge chasm between
Speaker 3: our pro life beliefs and our pro life behaviors. Our
Speaker 3: pro life beliefs, right, we agree that every human being
Speaker 3: is entitled to life, But our pro life behaviors what
Speaker 3: have we done to impede the efforts of the genocidal elite? Okay,
Speaker 3: when we claim to be pro life, we're claiming that
Speaker 3: we value human life inside the womb the same as
Speaker 3: human life outside the womb. The zygote is as valuable
Speaker 3: as the adult the field human has the same value
Speaker 3: as a teenager. Now, this is a foreign concept to
Speaker 3: many people, even those who may claim to be against abortion.
Speaker 3: Maybe that's because we rarely ask ourselves how we'd act
Speaker 3: if a five year old's life were in danger compared
Speaker 3: to how we would act when a baby in the
Speaker 3: womb is in danger. Let me ask you this way,
Speaker 3: if three thousand kindergarteners were being slaughtered every day on playgrounds,
Speaker 3: how would we respond? How would our churches respond? I
Speaker 3: would ask how would the government respond? But they are
Speaker 3: largely a part of this. These questions require personal introspection.
Speaker 3: If we honestly answer that we respond differently to rescuing
Speaker 3: those two groups, and then we must ask ourselves why.
Speaker 3: And we must be careful about referring to ourselves as
Speaker 3: pro life, because if we are truly pro life, our
Speaker 3: behaviors must align with our beliefs. If we are truly
Speaker 3: pro life, our behaviors must align with our beliefs, and
Speaker 3: our practices must align with our policies. So if we
Speaker 3: truly believe that human life inside the womb has the
Speaker 3: exact same value as human life outside of it, then
Speaker 3: we must confront the act of the fact. Pardon me
Speaker 3: that America's worst genocide continues on a daily basis, while
Speaker 3: pro life governments, pro life churches, pro life communities remain
Speaker 3: distracted by issues that are not life threatening and far
Speaker 3: less important. Right you go on Twitter, you'll see one
Speaker 3: hundred thousand tweets about cash Betel and the FBI and
Speaker 3: all these Trump appointments and net Yeahu's wife down in
Speaker 3: mar Lago. Meanwhile, another day goes by and another three
Speaker 3: thousand children are murdered. Stop being distracted by issues that
Speaker 3: are not life threatening and far less important. You know,
Speaker 3: we'll talk a little bit about exposing Margaret Sanger's evil legacy.
Speaker 3: Angela Rodriguez wrote something on this back in May of
Speaker 3: twenty twenty three, and you know, she talks about, you know,
Speaker 3: it's twenty twenty three. She just turned fifty, and in
Speaker 3: that time, from nineteen seventy three to twenty twenty twenty three,
Speaker 3: pardon me, over sixty million babies had been a boy.
Speaker 3: And she talks about how Margaret Sanger regarded by many
Speaker 3: progressives right the champion for women's rights, for sexual freedom,
Speaker 3: and how she founded planned parenthood. But much deep in
Speaker 3: that eugenics, you know, that is selective breeding, population control.
Speaker 3: She wanted to free women from the bondage of childbearing.
Speaker 3: She is quoted Margaret Sanger is quoted as saying, I
Speaker 3: think the greatest sin in the world is bringing children
Speaker 3: into the world that have disease from their parents, that
Speaker 3: have no chance in the world to be a human being, practically, delinquents, prisoners,
Speaker 3: all sorts of things just marked when they are born.
Speaker 3: So once again, this is a Marxist socialist who wants
Speaker 3: to tell everyone else how to live and to justify
Speaker 3: the killing of babies. But I think we should all
Speaker 3: also look at it from how abortion and the ancient
Speaker 3: practice of child sacrifices, right, and the Altar to Moloch.
Speaker 3: And doctor Andrew White wrote about that at nauseum. He
Speaker 3: wrote very deep about it and has written for years.
Speaker 3: And you know that there's this objection that is frequently
Speaker 3: raised to be a dogmatic stand against abortion. And I
Speaker 3: spoke about this earlier, but it's the Bible never specifically
Speaker 3: answers addresses the issue. But the reason for the emission
Speaker 3: has been pointed out by many Old Testament scholars. Right,
Speaker 3: it just wasn't It was so unthinkable for a woman
Speaker 3: to desire an abortion at that time, there was no
Speaker 3: need to make this offense in the criminal code, and
Speaker 3: most scholars believe that it was under the thou shalt
Speaker 3: not kill period. Right, And the Bible does speak about
Speaker 3: harming little ones. But before biblical text which addressed the
Speaker 3: practice of child sacrifice are examined, you know, you need
Speaker 3: to look at some of the archaeological and lib literary
Speaker 3: data for the background. So in nineteen twenty one, the
Speaker 3: largest cemetery of sacrificed infants in the ancient Near East
Speaker 3: was discovered at Carthage. And it is well established that
Speaker 3: this rite of child sacrifice originated in Phoenicia, which is
Speaker 3: ancient Israel's northern neighbor, and was brought to Carthage by
Speaker 3: its Phoenician colonizers. Hundreds of burial yurns earns filled with
Speaker 3: the cremated bones of infants, mostly newborns, but even some
Speaker 3: children up to age six, as well as animals, have
Speaker 3: been uncovered at Carthage. They were buried there between somewhere
Speaker 3: around eighth century BC and the fall of Carthage during
Speaker 3: the Third Punic War one forty six PC. Now, on
Speaker 3: the burial monuments that sometimes accompanied the urns, there was
Speaker 3: often inscribed the name or symbol of the goddess TANet,
Speaker 3: the main Phoenician female deity, and her consort Bail. Infants
Speaker 3: and children were regularly sacrificed to this divine compel, many
Speaker 3: people believe. To this day the elitists still worshiped bel
Speaker 3: and you know this planned parenthood is an altar to Moloch.
Speaker 3: Fulfillment of a vow was probably the most frequent reason
Speaker 3: an infant or child was sacrificed, as witnessed by third
Speaker 3: century BC Greek author Cleitarkos, out of reverence to Cronos,
Speaker 3: which is the Greek equivalent to Bel. The Phoenicians, and
Speaker 3: especially the Carthinagens, whenever they seek to obsain some great favor,
Speaker 3: vow one of their children and they burn it as
Speaker 3: a sacrifice to the deity if they are especially eager
Speaker 3: to gain success. So here's a typical example of an
Speaker 3: inscription to our lady to TANet, to the face of
Speaker 3: Bel and to our Lord Bell Hammond, that which was
Speaker 3: vowed the son of a son, because he the deity
Speaker 3: heard his voice and blessed him. And this fulfillment of
Speaker 3: a vow before or after obtaining a special favor from
Speaker 3: the gods, a favor that brings blessing or success to
Speaker 3: the decadent, appears to be the most common reason for
Speaker 3: child sacrifice. Occasionally, however, at times of civic crisis, there
Speaker 3: was mass child sacrifice that was practiced, as attested by
Speaker 3: the first century BC Greek historian Sikhlis, who reported the
Speaker 3: response of the Carthagins Carthaginians to their army's defeat in
Speaker 3: three ten BC. So, you know, the act of child
Speaker 3: sacrifice at Carthage is just abhorrent, and I'm just kind
Speaker 3: of scrolling down here. It's very detailed. We don't need
Speaker 3: to get into it according to the ancient myth Saturn.
Speaker 3: Rich I don't think we've ever done a podcast on Saturn.
Speaker 3: We may have, but it's much deeper than a planet
Speaker 3: in quote outer space. But according to ancient myth, Saturn
Speaker 3: selfishly swallowed up the first five of his children in
Speaker 3: order to prevent his destined to by one of them,
Speaker 3: hoping to gain Saturn's favor and thus his blessing. The
Speaker 3: Carthaginians worship Saturn by imitating him, so by serving a
Speaker 3: god with ungodly attributes, the Carthaginians were willing to submit
Speaker 3: to his murderous demands. Indeed, Saturn's demands may have assisted
Speaker 3: the Carthaginians in their own self serving plants. And again,
Speaker 3: a lot of the elites, Saturn is one of the
Speaker 3: entities that they worship, so again they would sacrifice children
Speaker 3: for special favors from the gods. And it's just the
Speaker 3: history of child's sacrifice has been around since, you know,
Speaker 3: thousands of years, and it continues today under the guise
Speaker 3: of plant parents hood, under the guise of population control.
Speaker 3: But to come full circle again, since the legalization of
Speaker 3: abortion in nineteen seventy three, I think the total number
Speaker 3: is over sixty two million unborn children have been killed,
Speaker 3: more than the entire population of Spain today. Abortion kills
Speaker 3: one baby every twenty seconds. You know, that means by
Speaker 3: the time we get done the podcast, I mean dozens
Speaker 3: and dozens of innocent lives will have been lost. This
Speaker 3: is a topic that you cannot remain indifferent or idol on.
Speaker 3: You know, we'll talk about the ten reasons why abortion
Speaker 3: is evil and why it must be publicly opposed. And
Speaker 3: it is an uncomfortable topic for many, but those children
Speaker 3: in the womb do not have a voice to speak,
Speaker 3: so it's our responsibility. Number One, abortion offends God. Abortion
Speaker 3: is never a mere personal choice, but a grave offense
Speaker 3: against God and his creation. The anti abortion struggle has
Speaker 3: always been a religious battle, and foremost in its ranks,
Speaker 3: you know, it is has the church really fulfilled its obligation?
Speaker 3: This is because church teaching on abortion is clear and unequivocal.
Speaker 3: And if you were in a church that does not
Speaker 3: have a stance that is clear and unequivocal on abortion,
Speaker 3: you probably need to find another church. Abortion is murder.
Speaker 3: There are no exceptions allowed, no compromises possible. Don't allow
Speaker 3: them to use the word pro choice number two. It's
Speaker 3: an unnoticed war that goes by the wayside on our
Speaker 3: busy daily you know, in the matrix. This continuing war
Speaker 3: on terror has led to a renewed national conscience, busness
Speaker 3: of the high price of war, and for many, a
Speaker 3: heightened desire for peace. Yet despite all this concern, the
Speaker 3: most horrible war of all has gone all but unnoticed.
Speaker 3: This is a war going on within our borders, and
Speaker 3: it has claimed over sixty million lives in the last
Speaker 3: fifty years. This scourge is a horrible as anything, as
Speaker 3: any terrorist act you could see, because it strikes at
Speaker 3: the very core of humanity in our country and the family.
Speaker 3: By destroying the most basic human bond of all between
Speaker 3: mother and child, abortion dissolves the precious glue that binds
Speaker 3: our nation together. Life starts at the moment of conception.
Speaker 3: This is the definition given in any respectable medical textbook.
Speaker 3: Because abortion is the taking of a life. You were
Speaker 3: killing something, a human being that is a live To
Speaker 3: declare a beginning of life at any point after the
Speaker 3: fusing of a woman's egg and a husband's contribution is
Speaker 3: irrational and an exercise of just simple chicunterery. Living beings
Speaker 3: come into existence all at once and gradually unfold their
Speaker 3: world of potential and to allow someone to tell you
Speaker 3: something different, that a baby isn't a baby just seconds
Speaker 3: before it is born, that it comes out of the womb,
Speaker 3: and a few seconds later when it come out, that
Speaker 3: it's much different. It's just not that baby has a head,
Speaker 3: it has arms, it has legs, it has a heart,
Speaker 3: it has a heart beat. And mankind must protect life
Speaker 3: whenever possible. You know, men, and I'm speaking to the
Speaker 3: men here on this podcas cast our first instinct, our
Speaker 3: first responsibility of being a man is to protect and
Speaker 3: the preservation of life. This begins with self preservation and
Speaker 3: extends to all humanity through domestic bonds and realization of
Speaker 3: a like nature. So this pregnancy termination stops the beating
Speaker 3: heart of a growing human being and is in direct
Speaker 3: contradiction to this most basic premise of human nature. It
Speaker 3: forsakes natural law. It's left America as a country unable
Speaker 3: to repopulate without the aid of immigration. And for the
Speaker 3: most part, abortion is an unsafe procedure and compared with
Speaker 3: other medical procedures, the abortion industry is largely unregulated, and
Speaker 3: while there's no exact statistics from the number of women
Speaker 3: who die from botched procedures. Life dynamics dot Com compiled
Speaker 3: the list of three hundred and fifty women killed by
Speaker 3: legal abortions. It's a It seems like a small number
Speaker 3: compared to sixty two million, but it's still a lot
Speaker 3: of women. Furthermore, according to a study by proabortion Janet
Speaker 3: Daling funded by the National Cancer Institute, and induced abortion
Speaker 3: raises a woman's chance of getting cancer. And again, I
Speaker 3: don't know this for sure or what would cause it,
Speaker 3: but I'm not going to get into that anymore. But
Speaker 3: this one I found interesting. Number six. Embryonic stem cell
Speaker 3: and human cloning research a biogenetic tower of babble. So,
Speaker 3: in a cynical but logical progression, the culture of death
Speaker 3: is now bent on endangering human life so as to
Speaker 3: destroy it its new frontiers embryonic stem cell and human
Speaker 3: cloning research in the name of science and health. Human
Speaker 3: life is destroyed at its very inception end quote limited
Speaker 3: cloning right. Limited cloning is used to produce usable cells
Speaker 3: that can be manipulated and harvested to aid the living,
Speaker 3: and it's becoming more and more prevalent, especially with athletes.
Speaker 3: Right and they brag about it, how much better they feel.
Speaker 3: But in short, the remaining ethical barriers that preserve human dignity,
Speaker 3: of God's rights and creation are steadily coming down. The
Speaker 3: biotech revolution has as its avowed goal not just curing disease,
Speaker 3: but the construction of a let's call it, a brave
Speaker 3: new world of genetic engineering, changing the very makeup and
Speaker 3: design of man himself. We can't permit the completion of
Speaker 3: this challenge to God a new tower of Babel, which
Speaker 3: will be like another Pandora's Box, This unleashing untold ethical
Speaker 3: and moral havoc on our nation. So how do you
Speaker 3: break the abortion cycle? Abortion has created a horrific cycle
Speaker 3: that undermines society. You see, this abortion mentality destroys the
Speaker 3: family by making it more difficult for new Americans who
Speaker 3: survive beyond the womb to find the family wielded together
Speaker 3: by the indissoluble bond you know of marriage solely between
Speaker 3: a man and a woman. And that's a whole other conversation.
Speaker 3: Children need families that will nurture them, that will guard
Speaker 3: their innocence and develop their personnality. In particular, all children
Speaker 3: must find within their homes the faith that enables them
Speaker 3: to know, to love, and to serve God in this
Speaker 3: world and be happy with Him forever in the next.
Speaker 3: As long as the traditional family remains in crisis, we
Speaker 3: will never sever the power lines that supply the abortion mills.
Speaker 3: Think about that, right, And in twenty twenty there was
Speaker 3: some Act Blue and all these other people were very
Speaker 3: out in the open about destroying the nuclear family. And
Speaker 3: as long as the traditional family remains in crisis, we
Speaker 3: will never sever the power lines that supply the abortion mills.
Speaker 3: And as long as faith remains dead and souls, we
Speaker 3: will never wipe out the moral rot of second ual immortality, immorality,
Speaker 3: which is the contaminated soil where the abortion movement grows
Speaker 3: and flourishes. It's pretty powerful, of course. Roe Versus weighed
Speaker 3: fifty years of lies addressing an abortionist. Right, and you yourself,
Speaker 3: the listener, You were once a young, enchanting child, right,
Speaker 3: all babies are. And then that person somehow evolved, whether
Speaker 3: it was through their parents or whatever journey in life,
Speaker 3: that they turned into a pro abortionist, a killer of babies.
Speaker 3: How do they not regret their wicked deeds? How do
Speaker 3: they not see the innocent blood of our children that
Speaker 3: stains your hand and cries out to God? Have you
Speaker 3: no shame as did your first parents when they sinned
Speaker 3: against God? How do you not turn to Him today?
Speaker 3: How do you seek his forgiveness, his strength and never
Speaker 3: again murder an innocent child? Would you not rather bring
Speaker 3: children into this world than destroy them? Children? You could
Speaker 3: raise the respect for life and take the place of
Speaker 3: those that you've robbed of God. And then lastly, there
Speaker 3: is the slippery slope. Yesterday it was contraception, today it's abortion.
Speaker 3: And what have we been talking a lot of lately? Euthanasia,
Speaker 3: same sex marriage? What's next? Well, once abortion is universally accepted,
Speaker 3: what logical arguments will stop euthanasia and other forms of
Speaker 3: murder under the guise of good and again? Eugenics was
Speaker 3: first coined in eighteen eighty three by Francis Galton, by
Speaker 3: the way, the father of eugenics and the cousin of
Speaker 3: Charles Darwin. The term is once again Greek, and it's
Speaker 3: interesting all the Greek that is in our government right
Speaker 3: the apollo Artemis, the Greek roots eu U means good.
Speaker 3: Genics means in birth to communicate the idea of being
Speaker 3: well born, artificials, you know, artificial selection. It goes back
Speaker 3: hundreds of years and it's always the same people from
Speaker 3: the same groups and the bloodlines and again even back
Speaker 3: here in the United States, nineteen oh seven, Indiana enacted
Speaker 3: the first forced sterilization law and the law would be
Speaker 3: applied to mentally impaired patients poor house residents. Back then
Speaker 3: they had poor houses and resident prisoners. Over thirty states
Speaker 3: enacted sterilization laws between sixty thousand and seventy thousand people.
Speaker 3: Listen to this. Between sixty thousand and seventy thousand people
Speaker 3: were forcibly sterilized between nineteen hundred and nineteen seventy. Most
Speaker 3: of them were performed after nineteen twenty seven, and I
Speaker 3: touched on this in that podcast. The court ruled in
Speaker 3: favor of the forced sterilization of Carrie Buck and Buck
Speaker 3: versus Bell, with Justice Oliver Wendelholm stating that quote, it
Speaker 3: is better for all the world if, instead of waiting
Speaker 3: to execute degenerate offsprings for crime, society can prevent those
Speaker 3: who were manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. Three generations
Speaker 3: of imbeciles are enough. That was from a court Justice
Speaker 3: Oliver Wendell Holmes. At the end of the day, these
Speaker 3: people are playing God, and that's what it comes down to.
Speaker 3: These people want to be God. They want to control you.
Speaker 3: They want to tell you how to live your life,
Speaker 3: how many children you can have, that it's okay to
Speaker 3: kill a baby, right, that it's okay. And just you know,
Speaker 3: in the time you've listened to this podcast an hour
Speaker 3: and fifteen minutes whatever, how many innocent children were murdered.
Speaker 4: And if it is.
Speaker 3: Genocide, what are we doing about it? If we are
Speaker 3: followers of Christ? Why and we think, you know, this
Speaker 3: is a great nation, that is a huge blemish that
Speaker 3: should be first and foremost. Right again, we're going to
Speaker 3: argue all these appointments and presidents. We need to talk
Speaker 3: about something that is the killing of children, and that
Speaker 3: should be priority. And it's a lot to look into.
Speaker 3: A lot of evil people involved with this, especially in
Speaker 3: this country, going back to the last one hundred and
Speaker 3: twenty years. You should read up on it. Understand the
Speaker 3: money that is raised not just through planned parenthood, but
Speaker 3: the Gutmacher Institute, which uses its money for publicity, and
Speaker 3: they're the people that think tanks that come up with
Speaker 3: the term pro choice right, it's all wordsmithing to make
Speaker 3: it sound a lot nicer. That's it for today. I'm
Speaker 3: really looking forward to next week's podcast talk about the
Speaker 3: George Floyd incident and the Summer of Love in twenty twenty.
Speaker 3: And I look forward to the radio show two hours
Speaker 3: this Thursday, December fifth, noon eastern to two pm. Be
Speaker 3: a part of the show. Give us a call. All
Speaker 3: the details will be on thefact hunter dot com. God
Speaker 3: bless you all have a wonderful week. Keep your hat
Speaker 3: on a swivel, and until we meet again, my friends,
Speaker 3: we will see it.
Speaker 4: I know it's been struggle gone.
Speaker 1: I know you've had spain. I know you feeling tired.
Speaker 1: Tell doubt all the way.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I know you feeling you smile ain't the same.
Speaker 1: I saw you way gone from you feel like you've
Speaker 1: lost your way.
Speaker 2: Don't give it. No, don't give it. But never this home.
Speaker 2: Don't let call the primise. It ain't done yet. He's
Speaker 2: got I'm plad Why it's a way time? God up?
Speaker 2: Let me come, why wait up?
Speaker 4: I can see the street beside you. Childs are putting
Speaker 4: up the five.
Speaker 1: Oh, you're stronger than any thing.
Speaker 3: You are.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you're gonna be all right. You're accepting a dead
Speaker 1: bodied beautiful you're shoving ride. Yeah, you're living, breathing, moveing,
Speaker 1: you can hold your head a pie.
Speaker 2: Don't give up, No, don't give in nevertheless, hold, don't
Speaker 2: let gone on the prime me ain't done yet, it's gone.
Speaker 2: I let why. It's a way of the God of
Speaker 2: maybe come we don't give up. No, don't give in.
Speaker 2: You never lose home. Don't let go on the primise.
Speaker 2: It ain't God life, It's worth living. What's a way down?
Speaker 2: The God of baby Colt? Why surprise now? The god
Speaker 2: Bay Colt? Oh yeah, what surprise now? The god baby Colt?
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, got TV cold? Oh, don't give up, No,
Speaker 2: don't give in?
Speaker 4: Nevers home?
Speaker 2: Do they go on the primise?
Speaker 4: I mean yes, got a playing white God of if
Speaker 4: it calls, and don't give up, no dog, give any.
Speaker 2: Help, lever hold, don't let go of the crowds. Gettin't done?
Speaker 4: Lovers worth living? Wats the god of every cos all,
Speaker 4: the God of needs waits done?
Speaker 3: The god of any coach. You're listening to the Fact
Speaker 3: Hunter Radio Network.
Speaker 2: Just the facts, ma'am.