Speaker 1: Okay, so let's just start with this, this really incredible contrast.
It's almost a kind of cognitive dissonance when you think
about it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it really is.
Speaker 1: On the one hand, you have these top tier NASA scientists, right,
and in twenty eleven they made this huge announcement about
Kepler twenty two B, a planet what six hundred light.
Speaker 2: Years of LA one hundred light years, Yeah, and they
are just pouring resources into hoping, just hoping that maybe
it could harbor life. It's this very noble, very public.
Speaker 1: Search exactly, a search for intelligence way out there in
the cosmos. But then on the other hand, you have
these sources and they're very specific alleging that just twenty
years before that, in nineteen ninety one, during the Space
Shuttle Discovery mission, STS forty eight US astronauts were actively
being tracked by non human craft right in our own backyard.
Speaker 2: And apparently so serious that it led to this emergency
transmission cut off. And then the evidence, the footage. The
NASA's official line is that it just sump r.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it ceased to exist, It just disappeared. And that
ten right there is what we are diving into today.
Our mission is to take this huge stack of sources
we've got. I mean, we're talking government reports, articles, religious histories,
even these radical scientific experiments, and try to connect the dots.
Just see if there's a pattern, exactly a potential pattern
of this massive, maybe even global concealment of knowledge about
extraterrestrial life. This isn't just you know, do you believe
in UFOs. It's about looking at why the most powerful
institutions on the planet, NASA, the Pentagon, even the Vatican
have allegedly gone to such incredible lengths to manage this truth.
Speaker 2: The sources we have are just they're incredible. We've got
a really rich set of documents to go through. We're
going to start with NASA, you know, the Kepler telescope
and that really controversial STS forty eighth Shuttle footage.
Speaker 1: Okay, then we're going to.
Speaker 2: Pivot to the political side of things, the nineteen fifty
two Washington d C sightings, the creation of Project Blue Book, the.
Speaker 1: Famous buzzing of the White House.
Speaker 2: Yes, that's the one, and from there we dive into
the Vatican at archives, the story of Giordano Bruno and
what really might have been in that third Message of
Fatima that they kept under wraps for so long, and
then to.
Speaker 1: Wrap it all up, we're landing in the ancient world
with this engineer Joe Parr and his truly mind bending
research on the Great Pyramid, the idea that it's not
a tune but something else entirely.
Speaker 2: Yeah, maybe a portal, an interdimensional portal.
Speaker 1: It's an incredible journey. We're going from modern astrophysics to
ancient physics really, and it forces you to question the
official story at every single turn. So yeah, let's get
into it. Let's start with that promise of finding life
so so far away. Let's do it so to ground ourselves,
let's start with the hard science. December fifth, Tony eleven.
This was, I mean, a genuinely exciting day for anyone
interested in space.
Speaker 2: Oh absolutely. The announcement came from NASA Ames Research Center
out in California. They officially confirmed that the Kepler space
Telescope had found Kepler twenty two B.
Speaker 1: And this wasn't just another blip on a screen, right,
This was different.
Speaker 2: It was a monument mental step forward because Kepler twenty
two B was the very first planet that NASA confirmed
was orbiting squarely inside the habital zone.
Speaker 1: Of its star Goldilock zone.
Speaker 2: The Goldilock zone exactly, not too hot, not too cold.
And for anyone listening who maybe isn't familiar with how
Kepler worked, you have to understand they can't just you know,
point a telescope and see a planet six hundred light years.
Speaker 1: Away, right, It's not like that at all.
Speaker 2: No, the Kepler mission used something called the transit method,
So it just stared relentlessly at one patch of the
sky and it measured these tiny infinitesimal dips in a.
Speaker 1: Star's light when a planet passes in front of it.
Speaker 2: When a planet transits. Yeah, and to confirm Kepler twenty
two B, they had to see that dip happen three
separate times. The regularity was the key, and.
Speaker 1: That told them it has an orbit of about two
hundred and ninety days, which is, I mean, that's pretty
close to our own three sixty.
Speaker 2: Five, very close. And the significance isn't just its rbit
or even its size, which is about what two point
four times that of Earth. The real promise was in
the temperature.
Speaker 1: The sources get in to this and it just sounds, well,
it sounds incredible. Six hundred light years away orbiting a
star that's pretty similar to our own sun, a.
Speaker 2: G type star.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and the math suggests that its surface temperatures could
actually be pretty temperate.
Speaker 2: Yes, they estimated that daytime temperatures could be like a
mild summer here on Earth. I think the comparison they
used was a summer in San Francisco.
Speaker 1: Wow.
Speaker 2: And that one data point, just that temperature range that
avoids freezing and avoids boiling. That's what opens the door
to everything else.
Speaker 1: The liquid oceans, a thick atmosphere, and.
Speaker 2: Of course the big one, life as we know it.
It takes the idea from just being an abstract theory
and makes it a concrete possibility.
Speaker 1: So the stated goal from NASA has always been this
really noble one right to find Earth like planets, to
understand how other solar systems are put together. But this
is where that irony we talked about just smacks you
in the face. We are pouring billions of dollars and
just decades of human effort into confirming the possibility of
life six hundred light years from.
Speaker 2: Here, while at the same time, as our sources allege,
when very tangible, very direct evidence shows up right here,
right in our orbit on the video feeds from our
own space shuttles confirmed by military radar over our own
capital city. It gets aggressively dismissed, it gets denied, it
gets disappeared.
Speaker 1: It's the ultimate blind spot, isn't it. It's really intense
public search for theoretical life and then this deep secret
suppression of alleged existing immediate contact.
Speaker 2: That tension is the whole story.
Speaker 1: Okay, So let's jump back in time then, from the
promise of twenty eleven to the alleged reality of September twelfth,
nineteen ninety one. The Space Shuttle Discovery mission sts forty eight.
Speaker 2: Right, and the Shuttle is flying high nearly three hundred
and fifty miles above the Earth. Its main job was
to deploy this big piece of equipment, the Upper Atmosphere
Research Satellite.
Speaker 1: The context is important. This is a serious scientific mission.
Speaker 2: Oh absolutely, this is highly technical work. It's critical for
during Earth's atmosphere or ozone layer, all of that. It
was not a sensational mission. It was science. But it
became the center of one of the most debated pieces
of footage in well in history.
Speaker 1: So the footage itself, it was taken by a camera
mounted in the rear cargo bay, and the sources are
very clear on this point. NASA says the footage no
longer exists or it was.
Speaker 2: Overridden standard procedure.
Speaker 1: They'd say, right, But these dedicated amateur monitors, people who
just routinely recorded the public shovel transmissions, they saved the tape.
So what did it show.
Speaker 2: It showed several unidentified objects. At first glance, you might think, okay,
space junk, ice crystals. They were described as these small
glowing or flashing lights. But the thing that sets this
footage apart, the critical detail is how they moved.
Speaker 1: This is the key part.
Speaker 2: It is the objects showed what looked like instantaneous acceleration,
and they made these sharp, non ballistic changes in direction.
I mean maneuvers that just completely defy the laws of momentum,
especially at that altitude with no atmosphere to push against.
Speaker 1: If they were just ice particles, like NASA.
Speaker 2: Claimed, yeah, the official explanation, they would.
Speaker 1: Just sort of float away on a predictable path of
ballistic trajectory. They wouldn't suddenly make a right angle turn
or you know, shoot off into the distance.
Speaker 2: They absolutely would not. And the story from the sources
gets even more detailed. It claims that for a moment,
the shuttle was actually surrounded by what one person described
as a UFO flying saucer type of craft surrounded. And
there's this one specific moment detailed where a shield at
one point was supposedly put around the shuttle briefly, and
right after that happened, all the objects just vanished instantly.
Speaker 1: The word shield there, that's not passive. That suggests something active,
deliberate an energy field to some kind.
Speaker 2: It does. And this is where it gets just I mean,
this is the bombshell moment, the moment of that accidental revelation.
The sources talk about this tiny snippet of dialogue that
was captured, and it was captured over what everyone believed
was an open.
Speaker 1: Public channel, and what was it they heard?
Speaker 2: The alleged quote is, hey, we're being tracked by an
alien spacecraft.
Speaker 1: Wow.
Speaker 2: And then immediately after that sentence, just dead air, the
transmission cuts.
Speaker 1: The speculation being that the astronaut on the mic thought
they were on a private, secure channel exactly.
Speaker 2: They must have thought they were talking on the private loop,
just voicing their shop to mission control or their crewmates,
and the second they realized they were broadcasting to the
entire world, someone cut the feed. It's maybe the closest
we've ever gotten to a completely unfiltered, in the moment
report from a trained observer.
Speaker 1: That split second, that lapse in protocol is what researchers
were citing say confirms the reality of what was happening.
You have a highly trained professional under extreme stress and
their first instinct is just to state the unbelievable truth, and.
Speaker 2: That leads right into the official denial. Of course, NASA
came out and said the images show nothing more than
ice particles, maybe some dust ejected from the shuttles vents
catching the sun for a moment.
Speaker 1: But you have to ask yourself, as these sources do,
why do we automatically believe the institution's press release over
the shocked, unfiltered voice of its own, highly trained, highly
vetted astronaut.
Speaker 2: And that's the point the sources really hammer home. It's
the credibility of the observers. These are not people who
are prone to making things up or hysteria. They are
military pilots, there engineers, they're scientists. Their entire careers are
built on precise, sober observation.
Speaker 1: So if they can't explain what they're seeing and the
official explanation feels so flimsy.
Speaker 2: Then the denial isn't about scientific clarification anymore. It's about
systemic damage control. It's about managing the narrative.
Speaker 1: And that contrast between the public excitement for Kepler twenty
two B and the total lockdown on STS forty eight.
This is a perfect little microcosm of this whole deep dive,
isn't it.
Speaker 2: It is the openness about the future of life versus
the secrecy about its alleged presence.
Speaker 1: Okay, so we've looked at the alleged denial from the
scientific community, shift gears now to the political and military angle,
because if these craft are really here, it presents a
fundamental challenge to national security. And there's no period in
history that illustrates that potential panic better than the summer
of nineteen fifty two.
Speaker 2: The Washington d C buzzing incident July nineteen fifty two.
It is, you could argue, the single most important UFO
event in American history, and that's purely because of where
it happened and how solid the confirmation was.
Speaker 1: Right, this wasn't some blurry photo from a remote desert.
This happened directly over the Capitol, over the White House,
the Capitol Building, yeah, the symbolic heart of the nation.
Speaker 2: And it wasn't just a one time thing. It happened
on two consecutive weekends. That implies a pattern, It implies
intent and intelligence behind it all.
Speaker 1: And you have to remember the context. This is the
height of the Cold War. There's this intense paranoia about
Soviet bombers. The whole city, the whole country was on
a knife's.
Speaker 2: Edge, so the situation was absolutely explosive. On that first weekend,
you have air traffic controllers at Washington National Airport now
Reagan National and they start seeing these high speed, unconventional
targets on their radar screens.
Speaker 1: And this isn't just a visual sighting. This is objective
electronic data.
Speaker 2: That's the key. And critically, at the same time, Andrews
Air Force Base, which was using different, more powerful military
radar systems, confirmed the exact same targets, so you have
multi site, multisystem conformation. It's not a glitch.
Speaker 1: So the objects came back the next weekend. The military
had to respond immediately.
Speaker 2: They scrambled jet interceptors f ninety four starfires from nearby bases.
But the objects they just played with them.
Speaker 1: What do you mean?
Speaker 2: The sources describe this frustrating cat and mouse game. The
objects would just outwit the jets. They would hover completely
stationary at incredible altitudes. Then they would accelerate to speeds
the jets couldn't even dream of matching, or they would
simply blink off the radar screens the moment the pilots
got close enough to get a.
Speaker 1: Visual and there was a clear pattern to it, a.
Speaker 2: Very clear pattern. Objects would disappear when the jets showed up,
and then they'd reappear as soon as the jets went
back to base to refuel. It's like they were actively
studying our military response capabilities.
Speaker 1: This is where the ancient astronaut theorists come in, and
they contend that the location was a deliberate choice. Flying
right over the White House, the capital of the Pentagon.
That wasn't random.
Speaker 2: No, they argue, it was a very symbolic direct contact.
It was a demonstration, a show of overwhelming technological superiority
aim right at the heart of our government. The message
wasn't sumped over the radio, it was sent with action
it was basically, hey, we'd like to talk to you guys,
or maybe more to the point, we're here and there's
absolutely nothing you can do about it.
Speaker 1: And if you accept that interpretation that this was calculated
symbolic communication, then the US government had to respond. They
had to regain control the narrative immediately to avoid just.
Speaker 2: Mass panic and maintain the illusion of military control, which
was everything during the Cold War.
Speaker 1: So that leads us to the deny engine itself, Project
blue Book.
Speaker 2: Right. The official response was incredibly fast, but also you
could argue, incredibly deceptive. Within just a few days of
the sightings, the government held this massive press conference. It
was the largest press conference the Air Force had held
since the end of World War Two.
Speaker 1: Wow. And what was the official line they fed to
this terrified publican press corps.
Speaker 2: The Director of Air Force Intelligence, a General John Sandford,
stood up and gave the firm conclusion. He said that
the phenomena and I'm quoting here does not contain any
pattern of purpose or of consistency that we can relate
to any conceivable threat to the United States.
Speaker 1: So basically, nothing to see here. It's not a threat.
Speaker 2: Go back to your lives exactly They blamed it all
on atmospheric temperature and versions causing radar anomalies, and they
said the visual sightings were just people mistaking stars or meteors.
Speaker 1: That's an impressive political maneuvering. By saying there was no
conceivable threat, they just immediately shift the conversation away from
what are these things toward don't worry.
Speaker 2: It's pure public relations. But they knew a single press
conference wouldn't be enough. The number of sightings was growing,
and that's why they created Project blue Book in nineteen fifty.
Speaker 1: Two, which was on paper, created to investigate these sightings.
Speaker 2: On paper, yes, but the sources we've reviewed, they argue
that it quickly became the government's denial engine. The core
allegation is that blue Book wasn't designed to find the truth.
It was designed to suppress it. The goal was to
take any and all reports, no matter how credible, and
systematically debunk them, label them as hoaxes, misidentifications, weather balloons,
swamp gas, whatever it took.
Speaker 1: Now I have to play devil's advocate here for a second.
I mean, Bluebook investigated thousands of cases. Isn't it just
statistically likely that a lot of them were hoaxes or misidentifications,
Oh for sure.
Speaker 2: And the sources don't deny that many cases were certainly explainable,
but they argue that's not the point. The point is
that too many tangible, objective sightings of objects doing things
that were literally just incredibly extraordinary, those non ballistic movements
again exactly the kind of stuff that just can't be
explained away. And the theory is the air Force couldn't
just dismiss the hoaxes to maintain the no threat narrative.
They had to dismiss everything. The credible reports had to
be buried along with the nonsense. And the history of
these studies shows this pattern over and over. Dramatic, verifiable
evidence just gets dismissed.
Speaker 1: So the fear driving all this suppression, Yeah, it wasn't
necessarily that the aliens were hostile.
Speaker 2: No, the fear was instability. The fear was what happens
to our society. If the public suddenly realizes that there
are a craft flying around with technology that is generations,
maybe centuries ahead of anything the US or the Soviets have.
Speaker 1: Your entire model of military deterrence just collapses overnight.
Speaker 3: It's gone.
Speaker 2: And the sources claim the whole cover up was managed
by this secret and small elite body of people, high
level figures and intelligence in the military, who were terrified
of the societal chaos, the religious upheaval, and of course
the loss of their own technological dominance.
Speaker 1: And then, just like that, in nineteen sixty nine, Project
Blue Book gets shut down abruptly.
Speaker 2: Why Well, the official reason was the Condon Report, which
basically concluded that studying UFOs for twenty one years hadn't
added anything to scientific knowledge, but the sources suggest the
real reason was twofold. First, the public wasn't buying the
denials anymore, they'd lost credibility completely, And second, the truly
sensitive investigation had likely been moved into even deeper, blacker,
more classified projects. Why keep up a public facing charade
when you can handle the real stuff in total secret.
So the termination of Blue Book ironically just made people
even more suspicious that the government knew way more than
it was letting on.
Speaker 1: Okay, so we've gone from science to politics and the military.
Let's make another big pivot now to maybe the oldest,
most guarded institution on the planet, the Catholic Church.
Speaker 2: An institution that deals in cosmology, creation, theology and secrets.
If anyone has been keeping records of these kinds of
events for centuries, researchers argue, it's the Vatican.
Speaker 1: And that takes us straight to the Vatican's secret archives.
This is an institution that thinks in terms of centuries,
not you know, four year election cycles. Yeah, the secrets
they keep have immense weight.
Speaker 2: They really do. And you have to understand the history
of the archives themselves. They weren't always so secret. Before
the sixteen hundreds, a lot of these documents were just
in the Vatican Library. But then Poe Paul the Fifth
in the seventeenth century ordered that certain documents be moved
and completely closed off to any outsiders, completely sealed, and
they stayed that way for over two hundred years until
eighteen eighty one. And even today getting access is incredibly difficult.
It's highly restricted, highly monitored.
Speaker 1: And the allegation here isn't just that they're holding, you know,
old letters from kings and queens. The allegation is that
they were holding explosive classified information about non human intelligence.
Speaker 2: That's the core of it. The researchers were citing believe
that these archives contain actual records, chronicles, of extraterrestrial contact
that the Church has documented over the centuries. They know
what happened, but they keep it secret.
Speaker 1: Why. What's the reason?
Speaker 2: Because the information is and this is a quote so
explosive that they threaten the doctrine of the Catholic Church.
Speaker 1: Let's unpack that, the doctrinal threat. I mean, on the surface,
you'd think, Okay, God is all powerful, his creation is infinite.
Why would the existence of aliens threaten that?
Speaker 2: It's a great question, and the threat isn't really to
the existence of God. It's to the centrality of humanity
in God's plan. Okay, Catholic doctrine at its core places humanity,
and specifically the story of Jesus, the incarnation, the redemption,
at the absolute center of the entire cosmos. If you
suddenly confirm the existence of other highly advanced, maybe even
more spiritual beings out there, beings who perhaps never fell
from grace or who achieved enlightenment in totally different ways.
Speaker 1: It changes everything. It challenges ideas like original sin, salvation,
the unique role of Christ for the whole universe.
Speaker 2: It could trigger radical theological crisis. It questions the special,
unique spiritual status of humankind and that is a huge
problem for the institution.
Speaker 1: And this doctoral fight is directly linked to historical figures
who were punished by the Church like Giordano Bruno.
Speaker 2: Absolutely Bruno was burned at the stake in sixteen hundred.
Why because he was a radical thinker who championed the
idea of an infinite universe filled with countless inhabited worlds
of you.
Speaker 1: They completely contradicted the Church's official geocentric model.
Speaker 2: At the time, it was heresy, and the sources contend
that the secret archives might contain the real reason for
his conviction, not just that he was speculating, but that
he may have had details, messages, insights, maybe even received
from extraterrestrials that supported his claims.
Speaker 1: So the theory is he wasn't just guessing, might have
been sharing knowledge that was deemed he ratical because it
broke the Church's monopoly on cosmology.
Speaker 2: That's the theory, and researchers believe that when those archives
are finally truly open, they will reveal a extraordinary levels
of details about figures like Bruno and confirm that the
Church has been aware of and actively wrestling with the
implications of alien life for centuries.
Speaker 1: So if Bruno's the historical example, the Miracle of Fatima
in nineteen seventeen is the modern one. This is an
event that involves alleged direct censorship.
Speaker 2: It is It took place in a sheep pasture in Portugal.
The story center is on three young shepherd children, and
officially the church recognizes this as an apparition of the
Virgin Mary.
Speaker 1: But the physical events, what the crowd saw that was
something else entirely.
Speaker 2: Something else entirely. There were seventy thousand people who gathered there,
and while the children were talking about seeing the Virgin Mary,
the crowd reported seeing the sun dance in the sky,
and many many witnesses specifically described seeing a spinning silver disc.
Speaker 1: A spinning silver disc, I mean that is classic UFO terminology.
That is not how you would typically describe a religious apparition,
not at all.
Speaker 2: And according to the researchers, the telepathic message the children
supposedly received is what makes this so critical. They believed
the message wasn't from Mary, but from the occupants of
that craft.
Speaker 1: What was the alleged message.
Speaker 2: The message filtered through the children's religious understanding, was supposedly
incredibly direct. It was you are not alone on this planet.
We are here, We've been here some thousands of years ago.
We observe you. Please prepare mankind that we will return again.
Speaker 1: That sounds more like an operational briefing than a spiritual prophecy.
Speaker 2: It really does. So the children were given three secrets.
The first two, a vision of hell and a prophecy
about World War two, were eventually revealed by the Vatican.
But the third secret that became this huge international mystery.
Speaker 1: The Pope just refused to release it for decades, refused.
Speaker 2: And when the Vatican finally did release their version of
it in the year two thousand, they claimed it was
just a symbolic vision about the persecution of Christians. But
the researchers were looking at They contend that the real
third message apparently talks about extraterrestrials, and the fact that
they kept it secret for so long under so much
pressure suggests the content was far more challenging to the
Church than just a vision of martyrdom.
Speaker 1: To withhold part of a verified miracle, one witnessed by
seventy thousand people, that points to a pretty profound institutional fear.
Speaker 2: It really does, and the sources put this in a
wider context, they say Fatima isn't a one off. They
point to other events in history, the voices Joan of
our curd, the visions that Lord's countless stories in the
Hebrew Bible.
Speaker 1: The idea being that advanced non human intelligences have been
interacting with us from millennia.
Speaker 2: And we've just been interpreting those interactions through whatever cultural
or religious lens we had available at the time.
Speaker 1: So the sources flatly state that the Vatican, of course
knows about extraterrestrial life. So why keep up the charade?
Speaker 2: Because control of the narrative is everything. The sources are
clear aliens don't disprove God. They just make God's creation
infinitely bigger and more amazing. The risk isn't theological, it's sociological.
It's psychological.
Speaker 1: A crisis of faith a massive one.
Speaker 2: The Church provides the spiritual roadmap for billions of people.
A sudden, chaotic revelation of our cosmic neighbors could shatter that,
shifting people's allegiance away from established religion toward well, who
knows what. The suppression is about maintaining control and stability,
not about a lack of knowledge.
Speaker 1: Okay, We've hit science, government, and religion. We've seen the
alleged patterns of suppression in the modern age. So now
we're going to dive into ancient technology and some really
radical physics. And this might be the part that ties
it all together.
Speaker 2: It could be because it might hold the key to
explaining the technology we talked about earlier, the SPS forty
eight craft, the objects over DC. We were talking about
the Great Pyramid and the work of an electronics engineer
named Joe Parr.
Speaker 1: And Joe Parr's experiment which he did back in nineteen
seventy seven. In nineteen eighty seven, they take the pyramids
completely out of the world of archaeology. He didn't look
at the Great Pyramid as a tomb. He looked at
it as a machine.
Speaker 2: As a piece of complex machinery. His work was all
about measuring its properties, the electrical, magnetic, radioactive fields around it,
and he used his own custom built, highly sensitive equipment
to do it.
Speaker 1: So what was his core idea his hypothesis?
Speaker 2: Parr believed that all pyramids, because of their specific geometric
shape and where they're placed on the Earth, naturally generate
an energy field around them. But he found that under
normal conditions, this field is usually way too weak or
too dispersed to really study in.
Speaker 1: A lab, so he had to find a way to
juice it up. Basically, that's the breakthrough.
Speaker 2: He developed a way to strengthen and concentrate this pyramid energy.
He needed to figure out how to flip the switch
and activate the power that he believed was just latent
in the structures shape.
Speaker 1: It's like taking that old kind of fringe idea that
pyramids have special energy and trying to prove it with
rigorous engineering.
Speaker 2: Exactly. His method was to take a precisely built scale
model of the pyramid and subject it to some pretty
extreme conditions, and that leads us to his most incredible finding,
the anti radiation bubble.
Speaker 1: Okay, you have to describe this experiment because this is
where our known physics starts to get very weird.
Speaker 2: It really does. So par puts his model pyramid inside
a centrifuge and he spins it at a very high skeed.
While it's spinning, he bombards the whole environment with an
intense alternating magnetic current.
Speaker 1: So you have the geometry, the motion, and the magnetic
field all interacting, right.
Speaker 2: And that combination allegedly caused this dense energy field to
form around the model pyramid. He described it as this
visible orb or a bubble of light.
Speaker 1: And what did this bubble do?
Speaker 2: This is the mind blowing part. Par claimed this energy
orb would block all known types of electromagnetic radiation, and
I mean the entire spectrum radio waves, microwaves, X rays,
and the really impossible one high energy gamma rays.
Speaker 1: Wait gamma rays, that's some of the most penetrating radiation
there is. We use thick walls of lead or concrete
to block gamma rays exactly.
Speaker 2: And here was this localized energy field, this bubble, doing
the same thing. It is completely inexplicable by any known
physics or energy forces that we understand today.
Speaker 1: So what did Parr think he had found? What were
the implications?
Speaker 2: He realized he had created a perfect shield, an energy
field that defies everything we know about how energy works.
If it's true, it suggests the ancient builders of the
pyramid understood a level of physics that were only just
now starting to theorize about.
Speaker 1: If a small model can do that. Think about the
applications deep space travel, military defense, even gives you a
possible mechanism for that shield that was supposedly deployed around
the STS forty eight shuttle.
Speaker 2: It does, but his experiments didn't stop with just shielding.
They moved into propulsion, into dimensional travel.
Speaker 3: What happened when he kept energizing the model in later experiments,
Parr claimed that the model pyramid, while it was suspended
inside this energy field, actually became weightless, not just lighter.
Speaker 2: It achieved zero gravity inside that bubble, and then it
started to move on its own in a very specific direction.
Speaker 1: So the energy fields wasn't just a shield, it was
also a propulsion system. It could neutralize gravity.
Speaker 2: That's what he claimed. And the key, the really stunning
part is the direction it moved. This is where the
ancient astronaut theories slam right into hard experimental data. Okay,
Parr calculated the exact trajectory that this weightless pyramid would
shoot out on, and that vector aligned perfectly with the constellation.
Speaker 1: Or Ryan or Ryan. That is hugely significant. Researchers have
argued for decades that the layout of the three GE's
of pyramids on the ground is a mirror image of
the three stars in Orion's belt.
Speaker 2: It is, and here was par in a lab with
a physics experiment providing a potential technical function for that alignment.
It wasn't just symbolic, it was operational, and this.
Speaker 1: Led him to his grandest theory of all right, yeah,
the idea of hyperspace.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Parr speculated that the pyramid wasn't just moving through
our normal three dimensional space. He believed it was moving
into hyperspace. And this connects directly to cutting edge ideas
like string theory, which suggests there are other spatial dimensions
out there that we can't perceive.
Speaker 1: So he thought the energy field allowed the pyramid to
basically access these other dimensions.
Speaker 2: He did so. In his view, the Great Pyramid, if
you could figure out how to activate it, isn't just
a big power generator. It's a massive, fixed piece of
interdimensional technology.
Speaker 1: A time machine or a gateway.
Speaker 2: A gateway or portal into multiple dimensions, was how he
put it. Something that could transmit people, objects, maybe even
just consciousness across space time. It completely reframes the pyramid.
It's not a tomb for a pharaoh. It's an engineering
marvel that can traverse the universe.
Speaker 1: But the skeptic has to ask the question that the
sources bring up it's the big one. If this network
of pyramids was so important, this piece of advanced global technology,
why is there not one single blueprint, not a single schematic.
Speaker 2: It's the ultimate archaeological mystery, isn't it. We have the machine,
but we don't have the user's manual. The simple answer
is maybe the blueprints just disappeared. Maybe they were destroyed
to keep the technology safe, or maybe they were never
meant to be left behind. But the sheer complexity of
the design, which Par's work seems to confirm, makes that
lack of documentation incredibly suspicious.
Speaker 1: Okay, so let's tie this all together. If we take
Por's findings at face value, this anti radiation field, the
anti gravity of the portal to Orion, what does that
tell us about who built the pyramids?
Speaker 2: The unified theory that the sources propose is that ancient
people all over the globe built these pyramids, from Egypt
to South America, and they all followed a similar design,
like a precise global network, and they were designed to
tap into the natural energy of the Earth.
Speaker 1: And the fact that the geometry is so consistent across
continents and oceans that suggests a single unified plant.
Speaker 2: It does, which means whoever was guiding this global project
must have been an incredibly advanced.
Speaker 1: Culture, far beyond what we attribute to the Bronze Age.
Speaker 2: Egyptians, far beyond and so the conclusion the researchers draw
is that this advanced culture was most likely extraterrestrials. The
physics that pars work hence at manipulating gravity, deflecting radiation,
interdimensional travel. That is the proof. The technology demonstrated by
the pyramids is the exact kind of technology you would
need to build craft that can perform the maneuvers seen
in the STS forty eight footage or to vanish from
radar over Washington, d C. In nineteen fifty two.
Speaker 1: So it connects the ancient architecture directly to the modern
cover up.
Speaker 2: It's the missing technological link.
Speaker 1: Wow, this has been This has been an incredibly expansive
deep dive. We've gone from the hopeful search for life
six hundred light years away all the way to an
alleged operational interdimensional gateway sitting right there in Giza, Egypt.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we've looked at how the US government allegedly covered
up these incursions over its own capital, how NASA denied
footage of its own astronauts being tracked, and how the
Vatican classified messages that could threaten the very foundations of
human belief.
Speaker 1: And when you lay it all out the synthes this
seems pretty clear. The sources we've looked at consistently point
to this systematic, cross institutional pattern of denial. The information
is always deemed too sensitive, too disruptive, it's technology too
superior to be released to the rest of us.
Speaker 2: It's controlled instead by an elite group that seems to
prioritize stability and the status quo over the truth.
Speaker 1: And it doesn't really matter if the motive is military fear,
or scientific dogma, or theological risk. The common thread is
always the containment of this idea that an extraterrestrial presence
isn't just possible, but that it's here now and has
allegedly been here for thousands of years, guiding us and
leaving behind these incredible machines.
Speaker 2: Which brings us to our final question, And this is
for you, the listener. Based on everything we've talked about today,
we've seen these three huge pillars of society science in
the form of NASA, government, the military and security agencies,
and religion represented by the vaticanl implicated in this alleged concealment.
Speaker 1: So here's the question. If tomorrow the full truth came out.
Let's say Par's physics is confirmed, the STS forty eight
tapes are validated, the real third Fatoma message is released everything.
Which of those three institutions, science, government or religion do
you think would be the most fundamentally challenged. Which one
would have the hardest time surviving that revelation and why?
Speaker 2: Would it be science which would have to tear up
its physics textbooks and start over. Would it be government,
which would be exposed for decades of lying and for
its complete lack of military control, Or would it be
the religious institutions which would face this potentially catastrophic crisis
of faith and a complete rewrite of human spiritual history.
Speaker 1: Think about it, Which pillar has the most to lose?
What you're saying, Let us know what you think of
the comments. We'd really love to hear your analysis.
Speaker 2: Thank you so much for joining us on this deep
dive into the archives and into the mysteries of our
past and maybe our future.
Speaker 1: We'll see you next time.