Speaker 1: What's up, everybody, and welcome to the program. Hope everybody's
Speaker 1: having a fantastic Friday so far. We're gonna jump right
Speaker 1: in today and we're gonna discuss an article from the
Speaker 1: Great Kate bricklet Over at the Daily Beast, and the
Speaker 1: headline of this article Epstein kept dossiers on his survivors
Speaker 1: to blackmail them. Now, if you've been following this case,
Speaker 1: like I'm guessing most of you listening to this podcast
Speaker 1: right now have been, then you know that Epstein kep
Speaker 1: dossier's on everybody, So it would make sense that he'd
Speaker 1: have dossier's on the girls as well. You know, it
Speaker 1: was all part of the blackmail scheme, right, compromise. The
Speaker 1: more information you have, the better position you set yourself
Speaker 1: up in, especially in that kind of world. And even
Speaker 1: if you're not an intelligence asset, even if you're not
Speaker 1: working for an intelligence division, even if you're just in
Speaker 1: a boardroom or you're in a competitive, highly competitive field,
Speaker 1: the same thing occurs information gathering, doing intel oppo research.
Speaker 1: It's the bread and butter for these sorts of people,
Speaker 1: and Jeffrey Epstein certainly was no different. He had a
Speaker 1: dossier on adossier and adossier on top of a dossier
Speaker 1: for everybody. Now that Kate is reporting on this and
Speaker 1: bringing it out and putting a pen to page, you know,
Speaker 1: it makes it more tangible, right you can look at
Speaker 1: it and say, holy Toledo, what do you know? And
Speaker 1: then you can refer to it and show it to
Speaker 1: your friends, like I call them the unsullied, who might
Speaker 1: not know anything about the case, And all you have
Speaker 1: to do is link them to you know, three or
Speaker 1: four articles, and before you know it, people will be
Speaker 1: sending you messages like what in the hell is going
Speaker 1: on with this case? So that's why it's awesome to
Speaker 1: see people like Kate and some others really, you know,
Speaker 1: carry the torch as far as people in the quote
Speaker 1: unquote legacy media. So let's jump into this article and
Speaker 1: let's see what's what. A survivor of Jeffrey Epstein's sex
Speaker 1: ring claims that a financial advisory firm linked to the
Speaker 1: deceased trafficker coaxed women into marriages, put their names on
Speaker 1: falsified documents, and kept dossier's on. Survivors that the pedophile
Speaker 1: financier loaned her out out to his powerful friends for abuse.
Speaker 1: According to new court papers. So in Dyke Khan, the
Speaker 1: financial advisory firm HBRK, to be exact, was involved in
Speaker 1: all of this, according to several different survivors. And now
Speaker 1: you have one of the survivors coming out, Priscilla Doe,
Speaker 1: and saying that that firm was involved with all of it,
Speaker 1: pretty much putting a stamp on the speculation. Right, Look,
Speaker 1: everybody has speculated, and you know, more than speculated, I
Speaker 1: should say at this point there's a lot of circumstantial
Speaker 1: evidence that proves her allegations. But with her coming out,
Speaker 1: Priscilla Doe and putting this on the record and naming them,
Speaker 1: naming HBRK for taking part in the sham marriages, taking
Speaker 1: part in you know, falsified documentation and all of that,
Speaker 1: well it becomes a bit more real. Right. Scilla Doe,
Speaker 1: a New York ballet dancer who says Epstein abused her
Speaker 1: from two thousand and six to twenty twelve, spells out
Speaker 1: more disturbing accusations against a wealthy sex offender and a
Speaker 1: mysterious corporate entity known as HBRK Associates Incorporated. The firm
Speaker 1: was once registered to Richard Kahn, Epstein's longtime accountant and
Speaker 1: co executor of his roughly two hundred and ten million
Speaker 1: dollar estate. So Indike and Khan were basically connected to
Speaker 1: Epstein at the hip. We all know that. We know
Speaker 1: that Indyke was there from the jump. He was the
Speaker 1: house lawyer, Epstein's generic version of Tom Hagen, you know,
Speaker 1: the guy that's around to offer advice, fix things, bring
Speaker 1: some money out, payoff people who knew to be paid
Speaker 1: paid off, and you know, go to the ATM and
Speaker 1: the bank and get involved in structured withdrawals as well,
Speaker 1: because you know he's so brighton all. But that's who
Speaker 1: HBRK was, Indike in Khan, the money manager and the lawyer.
Speaker 1: It's nice to see Cohn get some shine finally, right,
Speaker 1: This guy very rarely anyone no one ever talks about Cohn,
Speaker 1: very rare. We hear a lot about Indyke. Well not
Speaker 1: a lot, but you know, when we talk about the executors,
Speaker 1: we hear a lot about Indike. But con is a
Speaker 1: crucial part of this as well. He was the money man.
Speaker 1: You mean to tell me the accountant had no idea
Speaker 1: what was going on with the shadowy transactions. The accountant
Speaker 1: had no idea what was going on with the offshore
Speaker 1: garbage accounts. Yeah, he had no idea. Huh. He had
Speaker 1: no idea about the bags of money being given behind
Speaker 1: the scenes to people in academia. He had no idea
Speaker 1: the accountant. Okay, all right? And again, furthermore, why would
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein, the guy that is so smart that Leon
Speaker 1: goes to him for advice? Why would he need to
Speaker 1: pay an accountant? Can't he just do all of that himself?
Speaker 1: He's so smart, right, He's just such a talented guy,
Speaker 1: isn't that what Vanity Faik called him back in the day,
Speaker 1: the talented mister Epstein. So what did he need an
Speaker 1: accountant for? According to an amended complaint filed last week,
Speaker 1: Epstein coerced the ballerina into giving his powerful friends massages,
Speaker 1: and at least one of these friends informed her that
Speaker 1: he had Epstein's permission to do what he wanted to her.
Speaker 1: So I wonder who this friend is. I mean, take
Speaker 1: your pick at this point, right, you can put a
Speaker 1: whole bunch of these dudes up on a dartboard, all
Speaker 1: their pictures and throw a dart blindly and hit one
Speaker 1: of them and probably not be far off the mark.
Speaker 1: If not abusing this girl, then somebody else. I mean,
Speaker 1: just take a look at how the information's all trickling out, Folks,
Speaker 1: comes out that Leon Black is not only an enabler,
Speaker 1: he has his own accusations against him. Bill Gates, another
Speaker 1: guy played coyed. Make pretend, oh, I don't know who
Speaker 1: Epstein is. I only met him ONNCE. Meanwhile, behind the scenes,
Speaker 1: his own wife is admonishing him for hanging out with Epstein.
Speaker 1: Bill Gates thinks he's casting Ova around the office, running
Speaker 1: around trying to hook up with girls at the office,
Speaker 1: so much so that it was not hidden secret. He
Speaker 1: would go and change cars, leave the car that he
Speaker 1: came to work in, his security detail would pull up
Speaker 1: in another vehicle, I believe it was like a brown
Speaker 1: Porsche or some nonsense, and he'd get that and go
Speaker 1: out for his little trysts fellow travelers. At the very least,
Speaker 1: all of these people, and the fact that Epstein was
Speaker 1: able to even think for a minute that he had
Speaker 1: the power to tell one of his scumbag friends that
Speaker 1: they can abuse one of these girls at will, it
Speaker 1: just boggles the mind. Where's the outrage. Everybody who's been
Speaker 1: mentioned in this shit in court documents should be hounded
Speaker 1: by the media, and I just mean in the court documents, right,
Speaker 1: because remember, gotta have evidence here. You can't just you know,
Speaker 1: Reilly nearly throw claims of the off the old wall.
Speaker 1: When we're talking about stuff like this. You know, we're
Speaker 1: not talking about trying to, you know, make somebody look
Speaker 1: bad in an election or something. Here, we're talking about
Speaker 1: calling somebody a child abuser. So you gotta be real
Speaker 1: careful how you sling that one. But these people that
Speaker 1: have been mentioned in court documents and fingered by these
Speaker 1: girls themselves, they can all get aft. And I'll tell
Speaker 1: you what. After all we have learned in this case
Speaker 1: and here what thirteen hundred articles or whatever the hell
Speaker 1: we're on. At this point, we have a pretty clear
Speaker 1: picture of who these people are and how they move.
Speaker 1: And that's not saying all of them are out here
Speaker 1: involved in human trafficking. But if you look at all
Speaker 1: of these hedge fund managers and all of these billionaire
Speaker 1: Wall Street clowns, and you look into their past just
Speaker 1: a quick look, all of them have had run ins
Speaker 1: with commissions, with regulatory boards, or with courts. None of
Speaker 1: these people are playing fair folks, Okay, every one of
Speaker 1: them is using a weighted bat while me and you, well,
Speaker 1: we're using a whiffleball bat. Those updated lawsuit follows her
Speaker 1: rejection of a settlement offer from the Epstein Survivor's Compensation Program.
Speaker 1: Her attorney, Brad Edwards, confirmed that Dough decline the funds off,
Speaker 1: but would not comment on the complaint. And now this
Speaker 1: is where it gets interesting, right, So now Doe, Priscilla
Speaker 1: Doe is not accepting the money, So we're looking at
Speaker 1: a protracted court battle. Probably she's gonna try and get
Speaker 1: in front of a jury and argue her case. And
Speaker 1: HBRK and the rest of these clowns that thought they
Speaker 1: were going to be protected by the compensation fund, well
Speaker 1: surprised not so much. And we talked about this a
Speaker 1: little bit in the past, how one or more of
Speaker 1: these girls might not feel like the compensation fund is
Speaker 1: right for them and they might choose a different avenue.
Speaker 1: And that's what we see here with Priscilla Doe. She
Speaker 1: has decided to move in a different lane, and she
Speaker 1: has decided to pursue this in her own manner, and
Speaker 1: I think that's good for her, right she knows best
Speaker 1: her and her lawyers know best, her family they know best,
Speaker 1: not me, not anybody else them. So if this is
Speaker 1: what they decide to do, I say, go for it
Speaker 1: and go for the throat, right all of it. Get
Speaker 1: everything into discovery, subpoena everybody involved, get them all under oath.
Speaker 1: I mean, if the prosecutors don't want to do it
Speaker 1: in the Maxwell case, then hey, maybe it'll all be
Speaker 1: brought to light this way instead. An attorney for Epstein's estate, however,
Speaker 1: pushed back on those claims. The new allegations against mister
Speaker 1: Kahn and HBRK are completely inaccurate. Daniel Wiener, a lawyer
Speaker 1: for the Epstein estate, told us in an email. Neither
Speaker 1: mister Kahn nor anyone else at HBRK forced, coerced or
Speaker 1: threatened anyone in any fashion at any time. All right,
Speaker 1: says you, mister Wiener. These girls are telling a different story, though,
Speaker 1: and the track record has proven thus far that these girls,
Speaker 1: these survivors, these women speaking out well, they're telling the truth,
Speaker 1: while your clients have done nothing but obfuscate, muddy the waters,
Speaker 1: and try and slow things down to try and make
Speaker 1: it either a too expensive or b an afterthought for
Speaker 1: the public. Two crucial errors, by the way, because neither
Speaker 1: of that's about to happen. It makes no sense to
Speaker 1: assert or for your publication to report that people who
Speaker 1: worked for mister Epstein knew of his private activities, including
Speaker 1: sexual or other personal interactions. Between mister Epstein and women
Speaker 1: who worked for or associated with him, simply because they
Speaker 1: handled some financial and administrative services. Wiener said, yeah, you know,
Speaker 1: because the money handler, the guy that's laundering the money
Speaker 1: for the mafia, he doesn't get in trouble when the
Speaker 1: whole entire thing collapses. They show up with a couple
Speaker 1: of mixed drinks for them. Right. Ah, here's a nice
Speaker 1: margarita for you. Would you like yourself some tacos? Perhaps
Speaker 1: everybody involved goes down. You're an accessory. You're an accessory
Speaker 1: after the fact, you're directly involved. Whatever it may be.
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein and his crimes didn't happen, and with just
Speaker 1: him doing them, there's no way that that could have occurred.
Speaker 1: This guy was the accountant and the lawyer here says
Speaker 1: the publication shouldn't even write about this. Uh why not?
Speaker 1: Why should they not write about this when the survivors
Speaker 1: are the ones telling them this, When people who are
Speaker 1: involved in this directly are the ones telling them this
Speaker 1: and in fact the biggest of all of them. Well,
Speaker 1: this has been filed in court. Okay, so that makes
Speaker 1: it pretty real. A source close to Kahn previously previously
Speaker 1: told The Daily Beast that the number cruncher wasn't aware
Speaker 1: of Epstein's abuse of underage girls and young women Richard
Speaker 1: worked out of the office. Did Epstein appear at those offices? Yes?
Speaker 1: Did Richard see any of the activities that were the
Speaker 1: focus of press attention? No, the person said, Oh, okay,
Speaker 1: I'm sure. I mean, I'm sure that all of these
Speaker 1: years he was hanging around with Epstein and saw nothing,
Speaker 1: heard nothing. There were no rumors, never wondered about the
Speaker 1: young girls, never wondered about the massages, never wondered about
Speaker 1: any of that. Mister smart guy Khan. Okay, I guess
Speaker 1: if that's what he wants us to believe, folks, I mean,
Speaker 1: that's his story, I guess. I mean, if you show
Speaker 1: up to court with that story, you're gonna be in
Speaker 1: for a long day, buddy. So that might work with
Speaker 1: the media, you know, as you try to evade, duck
Speaker 1: and dodge, but you better hope that your day does
Speaker 1: not come where you're sitting in front of a judge,
Speaker 1: being deposed under oath or under cross examination by a
Speaker 1: fiery prosecutor in front of a jury. Because these are
Speaker 1: some serious allegations being made, and we're not talking about
Speaker 1: allegations that are being just you know, thrown out there.
Speaker 1: These are filed in court, meaning that Priscilla Doe is
Speaker 1: ready to rock and roll, mouthpiece in gloves on center
Speaker 1: of the cage. Time. Still, those complaint claims fellow HBRK
Speaker 1: employees helped to facilitate Epstein's crimes. They allegedly warn the
Speaker 1: women by email or other communitytion how powerful and wealthy
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein was, and maintain damaging files on many of
Speaker 1: the young female survivors to prevent them from cooperating with
Speaker 1: police or in civil lawsuits against Epstein and his trafficking organization.
Speaker 1: So you know, you always wonder, well, why didn't anyone
Speaker 1: talk about Epstein? Bob, Look, he had a dossier on everybody,
Speaker 1: all of these girls, and then he would call them
Speaker 1: with that flexing about how his powerful friends were, about
Speaker 1: how powerful his friends were, who they were, and how
Speaker 1: he could ruin their lives just as quickly as he
Speaker 1: could make their lives great. And you know these are
Speaker 1: young people, young girls, young men, whatever. You're impressionable, right,
Speaker 1: A powerful man like this tells you that kind of stuff,
Speaker 1: you believe it. And then you have his employees or
Speaker 1: emailing you and threatening you and all of that. Forget it.
Speaker 1: It's it gotta be intimidating. Employees of HBRK knew or
Speaker 1: should have known, that Jeffrey Epstein was a serial sexual
Speaker 1: abuser of young girls. The complain ads those individuals played
Speaker 1: necessary roles in facilitating Epstein's sexual abuse to the point
Speaker 1: that much of it would have been impossible but for
Speaker 1: the services provided by defendant HBRK. And this is something
Speaker 1: that we have seen right throughout this case being built,
Speaker 1: this sort of claim, and you look at it and
Speaker 1: you know for a fact that Jeffrey Epstein couldn't have
Speaker 1: done this on his own, that there were so many
Speaker 1: people involved and so many people knew, And yet all
Speaker 1: of those same people are now crying like they had
Speaker 1: no idea or like they themselves were victims. And I
Speaker 1: love that Brad Edwards is still hot on the trail here,
Speaker 1: and I love that Priscilla Doe has decided not to
Speaker 1: let them off the hook, Richard Kahn, Indyke, these guys
Speaker 1: are all gonna have to answer for this at some point.
Speaker 1: Folks now above that, you know, the Leon Blacks of
Speaker 1: the world. You know how, I'm not very optimistic that
Speaker 1: they'll ever answer for anything but the core for Indike
Speaker 1: Cohn and Jean Luke Brunel. Oh yeah, I'm confident that
Speaker 1: all of them are going to get some comeuppets. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: the lawsuit claims employees of HBRK, as well as Epstein
Speaker 1: related entities, NES Financial Trust Company and Florida Science Foundation
Speaker 1: arranged for Doeze transportation of Florida where she was abused
Speaker 1: by Epstein during his work release privileges. So all of
Speaker 1: those companies, folks, NS Financial Trust Company, and Florida Science Foundation,
Speaker 1: anybody who has done business with them, anybody who has
Speaker 1: transferred money to one of those accounts or taken money out,
Speaker 1: is involved in ill gotten and is involved under RICO
Speaker 1: statutes at least in the crime. So where are the
Speaker 1: RICO statutes? When are they gonna drop RICO charges on
Speaker 1: all of these people? Why the half stepping at the
Speaker 1: time of the alleged abuse in two thousand and eight.
Speaker 1: In two thousand and nine, Epstein was serving a country
Speaker 1: club jail sentence in Palm Beach for soliciting a minor.
Speaker 1: And now you got the whole entire thing where the
Speaker 1: FDL comes out with their stupid report that meant nothing,
Speaker 1: talking about how the deputies were watching him, blah blah blah. Well,
Speaker 1: if that's the case, how is he abusing Priscilla Doe
Speaker 1: at the same time. See, it just doesn't add up.
Speaker 1: And again I don't I can't side with the government
Speaker 1: right because all they have done is lie in BSUs
Speaker 1: through this whole entire thing, and obviously a bunch of
Speaker 1: other stuff, but we're talking about just this right now.
Speaker 1: So they've proven time and time again in this case
Speaker 1: especially that they can't be trusted. Their narrative is trash.
Speaker 1: So why should I believe them. I don't believe anything
Speaker 1: about that first arrest, that first prosecution of It's unclear
Speaker 1: which HBRK employees the lawsuit is referring to, but one
Speaker 1: Twitter gumshoe noted the firm's title seems to be derived
Speaker 1: from the initials of Epstein accountants Harry Beller and Richard Kahn.
Speaker 1: Both men are signatories on HBRK retirement plan documents. Public
Speaker 1: records show the most recent filing is signed by Bella Klein,
Speaker 1: which appears to be a misspelling of longtime employee Bella Klein,
Speaker 1: who on LinkedIn describes herself as a highly trustworthy, discreet,
Speaker 1: and ethical professional. Yeah, that's pretty much the hydra there, right.
Speaker 1: Those are the people that have always been Epstein's accountants,
Speaker 1: his confidants, the people that he trusts the most when
Speaker 1: it comes to his money. So it's not you know,
Speaker 1: it doesn't take a rocket scientist here, right, or a
Speaker 1: great investigator to put it all together. HBRK employees made
Speaker 1: it impossible for these survivors to escape from the sex
Speaker 1: trafficking operation. Those amended lawsuit states at times HBRK even
Speaker 1: operated out of the apartments located at three oh one
Speaker 1: East sixty sixth Street, where Epstein persuaded a number of
Speaker 1: the survivors to reside under his control. And that was
Speaker 1: the mysterious building at sixty six that we talked about,
Speaker 1: you know, the Mark Epstein building, his brother who owns
Speaker 1: all the units, who had no idea what Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 1: was up to. Again, morebs, another person let off the hook.
Speaker 1: You would think a legacy media that makes it its
Speaker 1: bones on destroying people would be all over everybody in
Speaker 1: this case. But what are they scared of? Nice to
Speaker 1: see that Kate walks in swaggering around, not giving a
Speaker 1: damn about any of these people, letting them all have
Speaker 1: it with their pen brave reporting, folks, there's not enough
Speaker 1: of it. HBRK additionally stored large amounts of cash in
Speaker 1: its offices to ensure that there were funds available to
Speaker 1: pay and silent survivors of Epstein at any given time.
Speaker 1: The document adds, well, that goes to the truth of it.
Speaker 1: We know that Epstein kept a bunch of money in
Speaker 1: that safe, and we know that Indyke was going over
Speaker 1: to that bank to take money out all the time,
Speaker 1: in the sum of seventy five hundred, so he'd stay
Speaker 1: under Title thirty one. And then that money was used
Speaker 1: as petty cash to pay people off. So definitely falls
Speaker 1: in line with all the stuff we know already. As
Speaker 1: The Daily Beast reported, Doe was among multiple accusers to
Speaker 1: file lawsuits against Epstein's estate after his death inside a
Speaker 1: federal lockup in August twenty nineteen, just one month after
Speaker 1: his indictment. For trafficking miners. Doe also was interviewed as
Speaker 1: part of the twenty nineteen criminal case brought by the
Speaker 1: Manhattan Federal Prosecutors. The amended complaint states, so that shows
Speaker 1: you right there, this is a serious business, right. We're
Speaker 1: not talking about some crackpot who just showed up out
Speaker 1: of nowhere. We're talking about a woman who was a
Speaker 1: girl when she was started abused by this man, who
Speaker 1: has real grievances, who is not going to be shut up,
Speaker 1: who is not going to be swept under the rug.
Speaker 1: And she has found the perfect ally in Brad Edwards
Speaker 1: to pursue this. I'm not a big fan of lawyers
Speaker 1: in general, but Brad Edwards has shown his metal time
Speaker 1: and time again. And anyone stepping up to the plate
Speaker 1: and up against Epstein and his posse of lawyers, they
Speaker 1: got my respect for sure. Doe was a twenty two
Speaker 1: year old ballet dancer when a recruiter brought her to
Speaker 1: Epstein in two thousand and six. She says that for
Speaker 1: years she was forced into sex with Epstein and his
Speaker 1: associates at his mansions in Florida, New York, New Mexico,
Speaker 1: and the US Virgin Islands. I mean, I hate to
Speaker 1: go off on a tangent again, but what's going on
Speaker 1: at Zoro Ranch? Another girl, Priscilla Doe, saying she was
Speaker 1: abused there? How many girls have to say they were
Speaker 1: abused there, Virginia Annie, Priscilla Doe, How many others? How
Speaker 1: many local girls? What about the massage therapists from the
Speaker 1: area that were in the Black Book? All these other
Speaker 1: places get raided, but not Zoro Ranch. No access there,
Speaker 1: nothing to see here. Folks don't worry about Zoro Ranch.
Speaker 1: The question really is I know, it's rhetorical why. The
Speaker 1: amended complaint also includes new detail on Doe's background, saying
Speaker 1: she worked menial jobs to pay for training at step
Speaker 1: On Broadway and the Jeoffrey Ballet and was about to
Speaker 1: begin rehearsal for The Nutcracker with the Iglevsky Ballet School
Speaker 1: when she was recruited to meet Jeffrey Epstein by another
Speaker 1: young female who had also fallen prey to Jeffrey Epstein's
Speaker 1: sex trafficking scheme. This recruiter offered Doe, who came from
Speaker 1: a poor family and had been living with her mother,
Speaker 1: the chance at a job giving massages to a wealthy
Speaker 1: businessman So again you see the same story unfold right,
Speaker 1: another girl, broken home, living with her mother, poor background.
Speaker 1: The recruiter knows that, prays upon that into Jeffrey Epstein's clutches,
Speaker 1: and he uses that, molds her because of that, and
Speaker 1: manipulates the whole situation because he has power and money,
Speaker 1: and all of the people that helped her get from
Speaker 1: point A to point B, all of those people should
Speaker 1: be held accountable for it. As previously reported, Doe traveled
Speaker 1: to Epstein's Virgin Islands compound with an entourage that included
Speaker 1: alleged accomplices, co conspirator, alleged co conspirator, alleged child abuse
Speaker 1: or not alleged. Actually this one general all around scusbag
Speaker 1: and bipedal serpent Guileann Maxwell, and French modeling agent Jean
Speaker 1: Luke Brunel. She claims that once they arrived, Maxwell taught
Speaker 1: her the proper way to give not gonna, the proper
Speaker 1: way to perform fillatio, and kept Dough and other survivors
Speaker 1: on call to service Epstein. So you got Gilain Maxwell.
Speaker 1: According to this report showing girls had to perform oral
Speaker 1: sex underage girls how to perform oral sex to please
Speaker 1: this disgusting, gross ass weirdo Jeffrey Epstein. Where are the
Speaker 1: rico charges again? Epstein controlled every aspect of her life,
Speaker 1: dough says, and took her virginity against her will and wishes.
Speaker 1: The financier pedophile allegedly forced Doe to wear underwear in
Speaker 1: certain colors, remove body piercings, undergo surgery to remove moles,
Speaker 1: and have her hair cut and colored the way he
Speaker 1: wanted through one of his stylists. I wonder if that
Speaker 1: stylist had to do with Frederick for Kai, one of
Speaker 1: the people that works there him himself and interesting angle.
Speaker 1: Wonder if we'll be able to figure that out. Doe
Speaker 1: also believed Epstein was monitoring her every move while she
Speaker 1: lived at the Upper east Side apartment he provided for her.
Speaker 1: When she took a trip to Montreal, Epstein immediately summoned
Speaker 1: her back to his Manhattan mansion and warned her she
Speaker 1: wasn't allowed to leave New York without his permission. So
Speaker 1: sounds like a hell of a guy, right, sounds like
Speaker 1: the kind of guy that you want to hang out with,
Speaker 1: said nobody ever, And you mean to tell me he
Speaker 1: kept this all under wraps when he was hanging out
Speaker 1: with all of his buddies that knew nothing. He wasn't
Speaker 1: flexing and flaunting his power over these girls to impress them. Oh,
Speaker 1: of course he was, stop it, that's in his DNA.
Speaker 1: He was a flaunter, a flexer, a loudmouth, and all
Speaker 1: of his nonsense, all of his bs is very very clear.
Speaker 1: This man was involved in not only sex trafficking. He
Speaker 1: was involved in money laundering. He was involved in tax evasion, and,
Speaker 1: according to this girl here, kidnapping as well. We know
Speaker 1: that Jeffrey Epstein and his criminal organization should be charged
Speaker 1: with plenty more crimes than they're looking at right now.
Speaker 1: That's one certainty that I'm very confident in talking about,
Speaker 1: because just take a look at all of the allegations
Speaker 1: throughout all of the years. You mean to tell me
Speaker 1: that all we have so far are the indictments against Maxwell. Really,
Speaker 1: Epstein intermittently surprised though by showing up unexpectedly, causing her
Speaker 1: to believe he was stalking her. The amended complaint alleges
Speaker 1: at one point, and allegedly forced Doe to serve ord'uvs
Speaker 1: at a private party with Epstein's actor buddy Woody Allen
Speaker 1: Oh hmm, I wonder would this be the same party
Speaker 1: that Chelsea Handler was at, Stephanopolis was at, Katie kirk
Speaker 1: Lewis goes on and on same party that you have
Speaker 1: a sex trafficking victim walking around giving you a piece
Speaker 1: of ham on a stick or whatever sort of or
Speaker 1: deuvs they're serving, but nobody knew anything. This server's role
Speaker 1: was forced upon Dough in order to demean her, frighten her,
Speaker 1: and impress upon her the need for her to conceal
Speaker 1: the commercial sex trafficking enterprise he was running. The original
Speaker 1: lawsuit alleges, the amended lawsuit adds another disturbing detail. Epstein
Speaker 1: further demeaned her by directing her to sit on a
Speaker 1: movie theater floor and massage his feet during a movie.
Speaker 1: So all of these weird massages, all of these weird
Speaker 1: hangouts at Jeffrey Epstein's house that are just mundane. We
Speaker 1: were just hanging out, We were just having a massage
Speaker 1: with our underpants on. Well, it's obvious it was a
Speaker 1: lot more than that. It's obvious that the guys that
Speaker 1: were hanging out with Jeffrey Epstein and hanging out over
Speaker 1: at his house, well, they weren't over there to watch
Speaker 1: the game, okay, And Jeffrey Epstein and his association, all
Speaker 1: of the people that helped him keep this thing moving,
Speaker 1: every last one of them that has been named in
Speaker 1: these documents, endyke Khan, the Core four. They all must
Speaker 1: be put under oath and they need to be questioned
Speaker 1: by a seasoned interrogator because how much more evidence does
Speaker 1: there need to be all of these people, according to
Speaker 1: the people that had happened to we're working hand in
Speaker 1: hand to make their abuse possible. Isn't it time that
Speaker 1: we see some rico charges? Isn't it time that we
Speaker 1: see the SDN Y kick in a few more doors?
Speaker 1: What are they waiting for? If you'd like to contact me,
Speaker 1: you can do that at Bobby Kapuci at protonmeil dot com.
Speaker 1: That's b O B bu y c A p U
Speaker 1: c c I at ProtonMail dot com. You can also
Speaker 1: find me on Twitter at bo bbu y underscore c
Speaker 1: A p U c CI all of the links that
Speaker 1: go with this. What's up everyone, and welcome back to
Speaker 1: the Epstein Chronicles. Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein. We're very
Speaker 1: tight and there's no denying it. But from the very beginning.
Speaker 1: I always said that Prince Andrews one out would have
Speaker 1: been if he came forward and said, look, I was
Speaker 1: being blackmailed by Jeffrey Epstein. Now would it be a
Speaker 1: good look. No, But at the very least he could say,
Speaker 1: I'm just stupid and not somebody who engages in the
Speaker 1: abuse of young women being trafficked by some sick bastard
Speaker 1: named Jeffrey Epstein. But instead he didn't say anything like that,
Speaker 1: did he. He never came out, went to the FBI
Speaker 1: and said, look, this guy had a dossier on me,
Speaker 1: he was collecting information on me, and I was being blackmailed,
Speaker 1: but I was too embarrassed to come forward and let
Speaker 1: anybody know what was going on. That would have been
Speaker 1: Prince Andrews won out. But did he do that? Did
Speaker 1: he come forward, Did he say that Epstein was pressing him?
Speaker 1: Did he say that Jeffrey Epstein was blackmailing them? No? Instead,
Speaker 1: what do we get from the Joe exotic of the
Speaker 1: Windsor family, Well, we get him hopping on a plane
Speaker 1: crossing the Atlantic to go and stay the night at
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein's house to allegedly quote unquote break up with him. Now,
Speaker 1: who does that. We're not talking about a girlfriend here,
Speaker 1: We're not talking about a boyfriend here. We're talking about
Speaker 1: somebody who's just your friend allegedly. So if you don't
Speaker 1: want to be friendly with him anymore, you don't have
Speaker 1: to show up in New York and tell them in person.
Speaker 1: You're the Prince of England. Don't you have people that
Speaker 1: can do that for you. So that was the excuse.
Speaker 1: I'm doing the honorable thing, and I'm gonna go tell
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein in person that we can't be friends anymore.
Speaker 1: That was what this guy tried to pitch to us.
Speaker 1: Then when he gets to New York, he ends up
Speaker 1: staying the night at Jeffrey Epstein's house for the whole trip.
Speaker 1: This dude could stay wherever he wants, he chooses, remember,
Speaker 1: chooses to stay at Jeffrey Epstein's. So what does that
Speaker 1: tell us about him? And what does that tell us
Speaker 1: about his whole entire BS story that he was going
Speaker 1: to New York to break up with Jeffrey Epstein, and
Speaker 1: not only that, but Jeffrey Epstein. During his deposition, he
Speaker 1: refused to answer eight questions that had to do with
Speaker 1: Prince Andrew and a possible black mail plot over the
Speaker 1: situation with Virginia. So let's get to this article from
Speaker 1: the US Sun and let's see what they have for
Speaker 1: us headline, The Prince and the Pedo. Slippery Epstein refused
Speaker 1: to answer questions eight times on Prince andrew blackmail plot
Speaker 1: over bathtub sex with Virginia. This article was authored by
Speaker 1: Iona Cleve, and if Prince Andrew was getting quality advice,
Speaker 1: he would have came out right away and said to
Speaker 1: the FBI, I was part of a black mail plot.
Speaker 1: They collected a dossier on me. They fooled me into this.
Speaker 1: I had no idea these girls were underage, all of
Speaker 1: that stuff. He didn't do that. Instead, he thought that
Speaker 1: because who he is and who his mother was, that
Speaker 1: he was going to be protected and that he was
Speaker 1: never gonna have to face the shame of being outed
Speaker 1: for the pig that he is. Because look, if somebody's
Speaker 1: being blackmailed, we could all understand that, right, we could say,
Speaker 1: you know what, I get it, that's shitty. But if
Speaker 1: your Prince Andrew, and you have all of these resources
Speaker 1: at your fingertips, literally could call MI I six and
Speaker 1: the best you can come up with as an excuse
Speaker 1: is that you didn't have the right kit, or that
Speaker 1: you don't go to the pizza joint. I mean, for real,
Speaker 1: that's all you can come up with. So why should
Speaker 1: anyone believe anything this idiot tells us. Jeffrey Epstein refused
Speaker 1: to answer questions over whether he tried the black mail
Speaker 1: Prince Andrew over his alleged bathtub sex with Virginia Roberts.
Speaker 1: Court documents reveal the pedophile financier pleaded the Fifth Amendment
Speaker 1: eight times as he was quizzed during a former trial
Speaker 1: against his ex lover, disgrace British socialite Gallinne Maxwell. And look,
Speaker 1: that's well within his right if you want to plead
Speaker 1: the Fifth that's what it's there for. But when we're
Speaker 1: talking about this situation with Andrew, there's a lot more
Speaker 1: going on under the surface, and Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew,
Speaker 1: we're certainly a lot closer than Prince Andrew wants any
Speaker 1: one to believe. Epstein was directly asked whether he and
Speaker 1: Maxwell instructed Roberts to have sex with Prince Andrew in
Speaker 1: two thousand and one, and whether he asked her to
Speaker 1: gather a full report to later be used as blackmail material.
Speaker 1: And that's certainly what we have heard throughout this whole
Speaker 1: entire thing. We have heard from multiple people about dossier's
Speaker 1: We've heard from multiple people about Epstein and Maxwell being
Speaker 1: assets for intelligence, and what is one of the favored
Speaker 1: operations for intelligence A honey trap, isn't it? And when
Speaker 1: we're talking about somebody like Prince Andrew, who is about
Speaker 1: as bright as the dimmest bulb, it's not too difficult
Speaker 1: to dogwalk somebody like this into a trap. If you're
Speaker 1: looking to compile evidence on this dude, you know what
Speaker 1: his proclivities are. Bring him in a girl. You don't
Speaker 1: even have to tell him she's under age, right, and
Speaker 1: then you set it all up, and Prince Andrew, being
Speaker 1: the dumb ass he is, just goes right in. But
Speaker 1: I was very, very surprised when Prince Andrew didn't try
Speaker 1: you blackmail as an excuse for what happened. That would
Speaker 1: have been the only ticket he has to get some
Speaker 1: people on his side, because then people can relate. Right, Oh, well,
Speaker 1: he was trapped into this. He didn't do this of
Speaker 1: his own accord. He wasn't out here looking for underage girls.
Speaker 1: He wasn't hanging out with Epstein just to do this,
Speaker 1: But that's not what we have, is it. Instead we
Speaker 1: have obfuscation. We have Prince Andrew ducking and dodging and
Speaker 1: never coming forward and telling us the really real. So
Speaker 1: when it comes down to it, what it seems to
Speaker 1: me we have here is a fellow traveler and not
Speaker 1: somebody who was being blackmailed. The American billionaire was also
Speaker 1: questioned over whether Andrew sixty three had sex with Roberts
Speaker 1: several times, and if the information gathered for the trial
Speaker 1: has the potential to affect the reputation of the Duke.
Speaker 1: To each targeted question, Epstein exercised his right to the
Speaker 1: Fifth Amendment, refusing to answer to avoid incriminating himself. The
Speaker 1: revelations uncovered in the latest dump of bombshell court documents
Speaker 1: follow allegations at Epstein paid Roberts eleven eight hundred pounds
Speaker 1: roughly fifteen million dollars to have sex with the Prince.
Speaker 1: Andrew's accuser has previously claimed he sexually assaulted her in
Speaker 1: a Victorian style bath at Glen Maxwell's muse house in
Speaker 1: Belgravia in March of two thousand and one. Monday's drop
Speaker 1: of documents revealed Maxwell's lawyer had claimed that Roberts lied
Speaker 1: about having sex with Andrew because he was too big
Speaker 1: for the bath And again, talk about ridiculous. What we've
Speaker 1: never been in COLLEGEA be for not to get too
Speaker 1: graphic or detailed, but you guys get my drift. We
Speaker 1: all went to parties and we all know if there
Speaker 1: is a will, there is a way. So that whole
Speaker 1: bathtub thing is just a bunch of bs. It's like
Speaker 1: the fingers, It's like Prince Andrew saying he can't sweat,
Speaker 1: and all the various other excuses that have popped up
Speaker 1: throughout the years. And the craziest part is he didn't
Speaker 1: need any of those excuses. If he would have just
Speaker 1: come out and said, on being black men, roll over
Speaker 1: on your buddy Epstein, rat on him, tell the FBI
Speaker 1: everything you know, and you would have had more people
Speaker 1: in your camp. The late Queen's second son stepped down
Speaker 1: from public life after the fure over his friendship with Epstein,
Speaker 1: and paid millions to settle a civil sexual assault case
Speaker 1: with Roberts, a woman he claimed he has never met.
Speaker 1: And can you imagine anybody paying attention to what this
Speaker 1: idiot has to say. I haven't met this girl, but
Speaker 1: I'm gonna give her fifteen million dollars just because you know,
Speaker 1: that's not logical. That's not something that somebody does, unless,
Speaker 1: of course, you have something to hide. And back to
Speaker 1: Dershowitz yesterday saying that Andrew made a mistake, Well, my
Speaker 1: guess is Brettler would disagree. And in fact, I'm going
Speaker 1: to reach out to Andrew Butler and see if I
Speaker 1: can get a comment from him, because it's basically like
Speaker 1: Dershowitz is shitting on Bretler's work, and I have a
Speaker 1: funny feeling that Bretler is not going to take that
Speaker 1: kind of stuff too lightly. We're talking about a guy
Speaker 1: with ego, right, one of the best lawyers in the business,
Speaker 1: and to have old ass Alan Dershowitz come out and
Speaker 1: basically shit on them, I highly doubt that somebody like
Speaker 1: Bretler is going to take that as a compliment. Andrew
Speaker 1: was cast out of the working Monarchy and no longer
Speaker 1: uses his HRH style after Roberts, who was trafficked by Epstein,
Speaker 1: accused him of sexually assaulting her when she was seventeen.
Speaker 1: The Duke strenuously denies any wrongdoing. Oh, he strenuously denies it. Huh,
Speaker 1: so in that case it must be true. I strenuously
Speaker 1: deny this. Don't ask me any more questions. That's basically
Speaker 1: the theory that he's trying to use. The transcript of
Speaker 1: Epstein's interview was released as part of the final trove
Speaker 1: of documents unsealed from Roberts twenty fifteen civil claim against Maxwell,
Speaker 1: who is sixty two. During Epstein's deposition, Robert's counsel Paul
Speaker 1: Cassel asked, in fact, it would be a fair assessment
Speaker 1: of all the circumstances surrounding the situation to say that
Speaker 1: you force Virginia to have sex with Prince ane Andrew.
Speaker 1: After Epstein declined to comment, the lawyer continued, what would
Speaker 1: have happened if Virginia if she said she refused to
Speaker 1: have sex with Prince Andrew. After Epstein again refused to
Speaker 1: answer the question, Cassell then asked Epstein, shortly after Prince
Speaker 1: Andrew and Virginia had sex, Virginia gave you a full
Speaker 1: report about the details of the sex true. Cassell also said,
Speaker 1: isn't it true, sir, that Prince Andrew? Thank you for
Speaker 1: making Virginia available to him for sexual purposes. Epstein declined
Speaker 1: again to answer, well, that's not a shock. This guy
Speaker 1: knew that he was going to incriminate himself with whatever
Speaker 1: he said, So mum's the word for Captain egg Dick.
Speaker 1: Questioning Epstein on the alleged blackmail plot, Cassell said, you
Speaker 1: had previously instructed Virginia that she had to give you
Speaker 1: a full report on the details of what men like
Speaker 1: Prince Andrew did to her, so that you would have
Speaker 1: black mail material you could use. True. Epstein was also
Speaker 1: quizzed on what he knew about Andrew's sexual preferences and
Speaker 1: on whether Roberts had recounted specific behavior that Prince Andrew
Speaker 1: requested before sexual intercourse. And this is pretty much standard.
Speaker 1: We all know that these girls were giving reports to
Speaker 1: Epstein about who they were sleeping with, at least according
Speaker 1: to them, So this is something that tracks with everything
Speaker 1: we've heard throughout the years. Later in his interview, Epstein
Speaker 1: was also asked, to your knowledge, Prince Andrew had sex
Speaker 1: with Virginia several times. Right before finishing his question, Cassel said,
Speaker 1: this litigation has the potential to affect the reputation of
Speaker 1: Prince Andrew right. Epstein once again pleaded the fifth to
Speaker 1: both questions. The convicted pedophile was found dead in New
Speaker 1: York on August tenth, twenty nineteen, while awaiting trial for
Speaker 1: a range of offenses, including trafficking minors for sex and
Speaker 1: multiple rapes. Roberts twenty sixteen deposition was also released on Tuesday,
Speaker 1: which featured her previous reported claims that Epstein had paid
Speaker 1: her eleven eight hundred pounds to have sex with Andrew.
Speaker 1: Throughout the questioning, Prince Andrew's name came up more than
Speaker 1: sixty times. She also alleged she was trafficked to the
Speaker 1: south of France to a foreign prince, as well as
Speaker 1: well known prime minister, who she refused to name over
Speaker 1: concerns for safety. I'm guessing it's Ehud Barock that she's
Speaker 1: talking about when she's talking about the prime minister, but
Speaker 1: that's just my speculation. Roberts also recounted how she burned
Speaker 1: the booklet she wrote detailing her encounters with Andrew to
Speaker 1: get rid of the painful memories. The diary was written
Speaker 1: at the request of journalists Sharon Churcher, and Roberts said
Speaker 1: she gave the writer some of the original papers relating
Speaker 1: to the Duke, but she said she decided to burn
Speaker 1: photographs at her then Florida home in twenty thirteen because
Speaker 1: they're evidence. I wanted to get rid of it. It
Speaker 1: was very painful stuff, she said. In total, two hundred
Speaker 1: and fifteen core documents have been unsealed over the course
Speaker 1: of five days after the media argued it was in
Speaker 1: the public's interest to remove he redactions which had the
Speaker 1: names of individuals. It is revealed a sordid trail of
Speaker 1: Epstein's associates and friends, and further details of his depraved
Speaker 1: sexual crimes and victims. Well, you know what, not for nothing,
Speaker 1: but I've been telling you folks this for years, and
Speaker 1: not just me, a lot of people. This is a
Speaker 1: story that the legacy media really dropped the ball on.
Speaker 1: And the fact that my dumbass has to get on
Speaker 1: here every day to put the pieces together should tell
Speaker 1: you that one such victim is Sarah Ransom, who claims
Speaker 1: that she was raped three times in a single day
Speaker 1: by Epstein as she tried to flee his notorious Petal Island.
Speaker 1: All the above have always denied any wrongdoing over their
Speaker 1: association with Epstein, and no tapes have ever emerged publicly.
Speaker 1: A spokesman for Branson blasted the claims as baseless and unfounded,
Speaker 1: and on Tuesday she stood by the allegation she made
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen that the convicted pedophile had recorded sex
Speaker 1: tape so Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, and Richard Branson. The
Speaker 1: trove of files also revealed allegations that Roberts was forced
Speaker 1: to have sex with a well known PM and Victoria's
Speaker 1: secret tycoon, billionaire Les Wexner multiple times in New Mexico
Speaker 1: and in New York and in New Mexico. The crazy
Speaker 1: part is there was never even a real investigation. I
Speaker 1: went down to Zoro Ranch in twenty twenty and I
Speaker 1: did my own investigation down there, and I sat with
Speaker 1: multiple people, ex police officers, people who worked at the airport,
Speaker 1: and they all had the same story. Everybody knew what
Speaker 1: was going on down in New Mexico, but the local
Speaker 1: authorities refused to act and instead what they do well,
Speaker 1: they punted the ball. They let the FEDS take over
Speaker 1: and let the FEDS investigate instead of going in on
Speaker 1: their own and protecting the citizens of their state. So
Speaker 1: the whole situation in New Mexico has been ful bar
Speaker 1: since jump Street. When asked whether it was more than five,
Speaker 1: she said possibly, although she confirmed it was definitely less
Speaker 1: than ten, and dozens of haunting photos taken from Epstein's
Speaker 1: private pedophile island show him in Maxwell hosting famous pals
Speaker 1: and scantily clad young women and girls. The previously unreleased
Speaker 1: pictures showed them posing at the late Epstein's US Virgin
Speaker 1: Island home in two thousand and six. Maxwell has been
Speaker 1: in prison since July twenty twenty, despite attempts by her
Speaker 1: defense counsel to have her released. On Belle, she was
Speaker 1: sentenced to twenty years in prison at the Federal Court
Speaker 1: in the Southern District of New York in June of
Speaker 1: twenty twenty two. The socialite indicated her desire to appeal
Speaker 1: shortly after her conviction, with her lawyer's claiming victims had faded,
Speaker 1: distorted and motivated memories. Her appeal is scheduled to be
Speaker 1: heard in November next year, and obviously we're going to
Speaker 1: be here for all of that. We're going to be
Speaker 1: here for every step of the way. And with Maxwell
Speaker 1: trying to get an appeal, keep in mind that Judge
Speaker 1: Nathan who was the judge during her trial is now
Speaker 1: on the Second Circuit Court of Appeals as well, so
Speaker 1: Glenne Maxwell, good luck with that. As far as the
Speaker 1: blackmail situation, if Prince Andrew was smart, which he's not,
Speaker 1: then that's what he would acclaim from Jump Street. But
Speaker 1: he didn't. And as the saying goes, Prince Andrew, you
Speaker 1: made your own bed. Now you have to lie in it,
Speaker 1: all right, folks, that's gonna do it for this one.
Speaker 1: All of the information that goes with this episode can
Speaker 1: be found in the description box.