Speaker 1: Hey, the Jesse Kelly Show. Another hour of The Jesse
Speaker 1: Kelly Show on a fantastic Tuesday. We're going to get
Speaker 1: into what Tulsi Gabbard said. She said to them made
Speaker 1: everybody mad, and I'm gonna address that here in a moment,
Speaker 1: and then we're gonna get to more of the Democrat
Speaker 1: messaging around the rioting. Gavin Newsom is doing something so
Speaker 1: amazingly transparent he might as well be a window emails
Speaker 1: and so much more. Plus, we have FBI former FBI sadly,
Speaker 1: former FBI special Agent Steve Friend joining us about a
Speaker 1: half hour from now now. Taulci Gabbard put out a
Speaker 1: video today. It's got half the right at more than
Speaker 1: half the right, completely irate with her. It's three minutes long.
Speaker 1: I'm not going to play it in its entirety, but
Speaker 1: in the interest of providing some context, I am going
Speaker 1: to play a lot of it. Okay, we tried to
Speaker 1: cut out a bit because the response to it has
Speaker 1: been revealing. So here's what she said. There's video to
Speaker 1: go with it, but you don't need the video. Her
Speaker 1: audio does it enough. She's talking about the item bombs
Speaker 1: we dropped on Japan, and then how she finishes it,
Speaker 1: and here she was.
Speaker 2: I recently visited Hiroshima in Japan and stood at the
Speaker 2: epicenter of a city that remains scarred by the unimaginable
Speaker 2: horror caused by a single nuclear bomb dropped in nineteen
Speaker 2: forty five, eighty years ago. This attack obliterated the city,
Speaker 2: killed over three hundred thousand people, many dying instantly, while
Speaker 2: others died from severe burns, injuries, radiation, sickness and cancer
Speaker 2: that set in in the following months and years. Nagasaki
Speaker 2: suffered the same fate. Pomes, schools, families.
Speaker 3: All gone in a flash, the survivors the.
Speaker 1: Heap, just warning you now, she goes on for a
Speaker 1: couple minutes here about how horrible it was for the
Speaker 1: people on the ground and the aftermath, just wanting again Kusha.
Speaker 2: They carried the pain of extreme burns, radiation, sickness and
Speaker 2: loss for decades. Yet this one bomb that caused so
Speaker 2: much destruction in Hiroshima was tiny compared to today's nuclear bombs.
Speaker 3: The bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima had.
Speaker 2: A yield of just fifteen kilotons of TNT, whereas today's
Speaker 2: nuclear warheads range in size from one hundred kilotons to
Speaker 2: over one megaton.
Speaker 3: A single nuclear weapon today could kill millions in just minutes.
Speaker 2: Just one of these nuclear bombs would vaporize everything at
Speaker 2: its core, people, buildings.
Speaker 3: Life itself.
Speaker 2: The shockwave would crush structures miles away, killing and maiming
Speaker 2: countless people.
Speaker 1: Okay, I can stop with there, because you get the idea.
Speaker 1: And what happened after she put out that video is
Speaker 1: a bunch of people took that as dropping the bombs
Speaker 1: was the right thing to do. Why are you apologizing
Speaker 1: for America? First couple things. One, let's start at the
Speaker 1: back end of this. I, as someone who actually believes
Speaker 1: that dropping the bombs was the right thing to do.
Speaker 1: I took that entire thing as a warning to avoid
Speaker 1: nuclear war, and I thought it was pretty transparently a
Speaker 1: warning to back away from any current or coming conflict
Speaker 1: because the prospect of nuclear war now is infinitely more
Speaker 1: terrible than it was when we actually dropped a couple
Speaker 1: of them before. I think that was fair. I mean, obviously,
Speaker 1: isn't that obvious to everybody. Her purpose of this was
Speaker 1: let's find other ways, let's attempt to avoid nuclear war.
Speaker 1: And look, I'm not some Tulsa Gabbard super fan. As
Speaker 1: you know, I've been critical of her. I've expressed distrust,
Speaker 1: but it was very obvious that's what she was doing.
Speaker 1: But let's set that aside. People got angry about that.
Speaker 1: Are you saying that was the wrong thing? It was
Speaker 1: the only thing to do. We had no choice. We
Speaker 1: had we had, So let's talk because there are things
Speaker 1: we should talk about. It's healthy to talk about dropping
Speaker 1: the atom bombs or bombing civilians at all, whether it's
Speaker 1: a drone strike today or whether it's an atom bomb
Speaker 1: on Hiroshima, fire bombing Dresden, But whatever it is, I personally, again,
Speaker 1: I don't want to be meanly about about the whole thing.
Speaker 1: So I'm going to give you my personal take on it.
Speaker 1: The way the Japanese fought that war, never surrendering down
Speaker 1: to the last man. It had America so convinced that
Speaker 1: so many troops were going to die when we invaded.
Speaker 1: Did you know we had already placed I think it
Speaker 1: was the Department of Defense had already placed the order
Speaker 1: for two hundred and fifty thousand body banks. That was
Speaker 1: the initial order that had already been placed American troops.
Speaker 1: The estimates were a million, but who knows what the
Speaker 1: number ends up being. Japan had publicly announced that I
Speaker 1: forget what their slogan was, it escapes me now, but
Speaker 1: it was one hundred million of us will die or
Speaker 1: we will save Japan, essentially announcing we will fight until
Speaker 1: the last man, woman and child dies. Women and children
Speaker 1: were training with bamboo spears. It would have been unlike
Speaker 1: anything that ever happened in human history trying to invade
Speaker 1: that island. Because of that, the way it was fought,
Speaker 1: all that stuff. Because of that, I believe dropping the
Speaker 1: bombs to bring the war to an end was actually
Speaker 1: the most merciful solution, not only for us, for them.
Speaker 1: That's what I believe. That said, as much as I
Speaker 1: adore World War two like every other middle aged man,
Speaker 1: it is not my religion. In World War II has
Speaker 1: become a religion for people. It has become a religion
Speaker 1: for people that you are only ever allowed to discuss
Speaker 1: it in this way. You're never allowed to quite dance
Speaker 1: or discuss that or even bring this up. That is
Speaker 1: how people people approach World War two. The only other
Speaker 1: thing I've ever encountered that's similar to it is the
Speaker 1: Civil War, where if you have a different opinion about
Speaker 1: this general or this way or this strategy people to
Speaker 1: this day. I mean, we're two hundred years removed from
Speaker 1: the Civil War to this day. I'm gonna give her
Speaker 1: take to this day. You bring it up in the
Speaker 1: wrong circle and people will be upset about it. They'll
Speaker 1: start screaming at you about it. World War II is
Speaker 1: the exact same way in Tausi. Gabbard has had hate
Speaker 1: poured on her today from people thinking she was questioning that,
Speaker 1: and maybe she was, and given her personality type and whatnot,
Speaker 1: she probably was. She probably doesn't believe in it, but
Speaker 1: as someone who thinks dropping the bombs was the right
Speaker 1: thing to do. If you don't believe in hurting civilians
Speaker 1: in war, if you think bombing civilians drone strikes of
Speaker 1: tom of bombs, if you think that is morally wrong
Speaker 1: and morally unjustified, that's a completely reasonable take to have,
Speaker 1: completely reasonable. And we may disagree, and we do disagree
Speaker 1: on the atom bombs if that's how you feel, but
Speaker 1: I'll never call you an eighty eight or anything like that.
Speaker 1: That's a totally reasonable take. And you want to hear
Speaker 1: what a religion World War II has become Taulci Gabbards
Speaker 1: had hate poured on her all day for that take.
Speaker 1: That take that she had, Let's say that was her take. Hey,
Speaker 1: I shouldn't drop this. That was a very common take
Speaker 1: at the time. At the time, forget the atom bombs,
Speaker 1: before the atom bombs even came along, Bombing German cities
Speaker 1: with civilians in them, bombing Japanese cities with civilians in
Speaker 1: them was controversial at the time, not just by some
Speaker 1: limpristed media guy. Inside the United States government, inside the
Speaker 1: United States military, there were arguments. It's all written down,
Speaker 1: documented long arguments, this is wrong, No, it's right, No,
Speaker 1: we shouldn't, No, we should. But because for some reason
Speaker 1: I cannot figure it out. For some reason, the World
Speaker 1: War two has become this religion. You're never allowed to analyze.
Speaker 1: You're never allowed to question this aspect of it or
Speaker 1: another aspect of it. And whenever anybody does bring up
Speaker 1: a hey, maybe we shouldn't have people react in the meanest,
Speaker 1: nastiest ways as if you've just spit on their child.
Speaker 1: You're allowed to have these arguments and debates about histories
Speaker 1: and wars and strategies and morality, and it's healthy if
Speaker 1: you do have these debates. World War two is not
Speaker 1: a religion. It's the largest war, most destructive war, the
Speaker 1: war ever fought. You're allowed to argue about the things
Speaker 1: they were arguing about at the time. Just wanted to
Speaker 1: clarify that. Now, let's talk about the riots, America and
Speaker 1: your children's schooling.
Speaker 4: Hang on.
Speaker 1: The Jesse Kelly Show on a wonderful, wonderful Tuesday. Don't
Speaker 1: forget if you missed any part of the show, you
Speaker 1: can download the whole thing. iHeart, Spotify, iTunes. I should
Speaker 1: give you a heads up. Depending on how the riot
Speaker 1: situation goes, Tomorrow might be the history special I've been
Speaker 1: promising you. You're the one who chose the next subject.
Speaker 1: It's an incredible tale. It might be tomorrow, but we're
Speaker 1: gonna have to see. I can't look. I can't just
Speaker 1: drop it out there and go do history for an
Speaker 1: hour or two. If the world's coming to an end, okay,
Speaker 1: But if if everything remains as it is now, tomorrow
Speaker 1: we're going to dig into that cool Now, speaking of
Speaker 1: the riots, this is not going to be about the riots,
Speaker 1: but I want to play a couple of things for you.
Speaker 1: One of the La rioters had something interesting to say.
Speaker 3: Hey, Hend, this was Mexico.
Speaker 1: You jack get us out of the hang on, let
Speaker 1: me start that again. Since Jewish producer Chris didn't have
Speaker 1: the soundboard on in time, he messed that up. I didn't,
Speaker 1: so you didn't get to hear the beginning of it. Sorry, Chris.
Speaker 1: I guess I could have covered for you there. I
Speaker 1: just didn't feel the need. Here is it in its
Speaker 1: entirety city, Hend, this was Mexico, you jack, get us
Speaker 1: out of the len that was our, the land that
Speaker 1: was ours. Okay, here's a former Univision anchor on CNN.
Speaker 3: Remember that California was part of Mexico.
Speaker 5: All of us southwest is Mexico, so the roots are
Speaker 5: really deep in that region.
Speaker 1: Hmm. Okay, well, we'll get into that in the moment.
Speaker 1: Don't worry all address the actual matter at hand. But
Speaker 1: why are there so many people in this country that
Speaker 1: think like that? How is it that we have so
Speaker 1: many people in this country who think like that? Tell
Speaker 1: you about Let's go back to the news. Allow me
Speaker 1: to introduce you to mister Ron Gochez. Listen to what
Speaker 1: he has to say.
Speaker 6: We saw President Trump give the order of the National
Speaker 6: Guard and so for us as indigenous people to these lands,
Speaker 6: to this continent, this is nothing new. The military going
Speaker 6: after us is nothing new. The United States and this
Speaker 6: part of the country is a result of a military
Speaker 6: invasion of Mexico, and so we know what's coming.
Speaker 1: It's more repression.
Speaker 6: But what they have to know that that they're also
Speaker 6: going to face more resistance from the community.
Speaker 1: We don't want to be.
Speaker 6: Violent, and we don't advocate for violence, but when they
Speaker 6: use brutal violence against our people, and kidnapping mothers and
Speaker 6: fathers from children is violent. When they do things like that,
Speaker 6: we have every right, every historic right to defend our
Speaker 6: communities by any ways that we can, and we're going
Speaker 6: to continue to do so.
Speaker 1: I asked, how did we get so many people in
Speaker 1: this country who think like that. That guy who just spoke,
Speaker 1: he's a history teacher in la public schools. He's a
Speaker 1: history teacher. Remember how many times we've talked about this,
Speaker 1: that the communist is always conquering, always trying to find
Speaker 1: critical choke points of power so he can conquer it
Speaker 1: and spread his religion. He is an evangelist in every
Speaker 1: sense of the word. And remember how many times we've
Speaker 1: talked about the subject of history in particular. No, this
Speaker 1: is not why I love it. I loved it way
Speaker 1: before then. But as someone who loves history, I am
Speaker 1: constantly angry and mortified when I pick a subject, any subject,
Speaker 1: and I start reading on it, and I'll even maybe
Speaker 1: download a podcast, or I'll go searching through podcasts trying
Speaker 1: to get different perspectives on things. I get so angry
Speaker 1: and frustrated at how often history, which you would think
Speaker 1: you know, wouldn't have a side of course, it's not
Speaker 1: left or right, it's just the facts and dates and
Speaker 1: stories and things that happen. How often history books, history
Speaker 1: podcasts are presented from the most filthy communist point of view,
Speaker 1: designed to put down America, the West, Christianity, white people,
Speaker 1: you name it. Well, that didn't happen by accident either,
Speaker 1: You see you because you don't have the mindset of
Speaker 1: a conquer and I'm glad you don't. You don't look
Speaker 1: at something like a history class and think to yourself, Wow,
Speaker 1: I should go take that over. If I could take
Speaker 1: over that history class, if I could teach that class,
Speaker 1: then I would have, year after year after year, a
Speaker 1: new group of students, and I could teach them all
Speaker 1: how bad America sucks. You don't think in those terms. Look,
Speaker 1: you wouldn't even think that with what you believe. Hey,
Speaker 1: if I could just take this over, I could make
Speaker 1: sure everybody has to learn that America is great. You
Speaker 1: don't think in those terms, and that's fine, but we
Speaker 1: have to remember the communist does. That's how he thinks
Speaker 1: about things. And this is not about la And it
Speaker 1: wasn't about that particular guy. It's about you, and more specifically,
Speaker 1: it's about your child. Your child goes to school most
Speaker 1: likely unless you're homeschooling, which I love. But your child
Speaker 1: to school. And I'm telling you right now, there may
Speaker 1: be one, there may be fifty, but there are communist
Speaker 1: predators in your child's school who grabbed that position, whether
Speaker 1: it's teacher, super or superintendent, principle, whatever it is, they
Speaker 1: grabbed their position in the education system and they grabbed
Speaker 1: it so they could spread the religion of Communism into
Speaker 1: your child. That's why they're there. We have to be
Speaker 1: aware of this. It didn't stop because all this quote
Speaker 1: woke stuff got unpopular. It has not stopped at all.
Speaker 1: All these communist religious zelots are all right where they've
Speaker 1: always been. In front of the classroom, teaching your child
Speaker 1: to hate you. Just a reminder, all right, it is
Speaker 1: the Jesse Kelly Show on a wonderful, wonderful Tuesday with
Speaker 1: me super healthy fasting Jesse Jewish producer Chris been scornful
Speaker 1: of my healthy decision making to fast today. Yes you have,
Speaker 1: but it is fasting, Chris. One protein shake, it still counts
Speaker 1: as fasting. Joining me now, former FBI special agent, and
Speaker 1: we're gonna get to that here in a couple of minutes. Steve, Friend, Steve,
Speaker 1: have you ever done anything as brave as fasting for
Speaker 1: half a day with only a protein shake at one time?
Speaker 4: Try to run a half marathon fueled by a half
Speaker 4: an almond? So thoughts and prayers.
Speaker 1: That sounds horrible. Why would you do something like that? Okay, focus, Steve.
Speaker 1: Let's focus on some law enforcement things, because you know
Speaker 1: a little something about that. My email inbox has been
Speaker 1: full of a bunch of people suggesting something pretty sharp
Speaker 1: taking down these communist front groups who fund all the
Speaker 1: street animals in this country. And everyone's using terms like
Speaker 1: rico and whatnot. But you're the former FBI special agent
Speaker 1: with worlds of experience. I am not is that something
Speaker 1: that can be done. Explain to us what it takes.
Speaker 1: How's all this work? The floor is yours.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it absolutely can be done. I mean, this is
Speaker 4: a complex financial investigation that you would hope the premier
Speaker 4: law enforcement agency for the country, the FBI, would be
Speaker 4: all over. The problem is the time it would require
Speaker 4: to do that. And also there are added complications of
Speaker 4: the fact that so many of these organizations are funded
Speaker 4: by the US tax payer via the NGOs that exist
Speaker 4: and then seek out grants, and then there's all these
Speaker 4: relationships that are crossing over between former members of the
Speaker 4: federal government and then lobbyists who go to Congress and
Speaker 4: get them. So it is a complex investigation and it
Speaker 4: is something you would hope that would endeavor. The issue
Speaker 4: I think that most people are seeking is a more
Speaker 4: immediate remedy to the situation. And unfortunately, there's a cultural
Speaker 4: problem that exists not just the FBI, but within federal
Speaker 4: law enforcement in general, where you see footage of people
Speaker 4: in gauging in illegal activity that is on its safe folonious,
Speaker 4: and you would hope that there would be an agent
Speaker 4: or some sort of officer of law there would want
Speaker 4: to engage in stopping it, making the arrest. But frankly,
Speaker 4: you have federal prosecutors that have drilled into the heads
Speaker 4: of so many of these federal agencies that they're unable
Speaker 4: to take action. So if you see someone throwing a
Speaker 4: brick or a concrete block through the windshield of a
Speaker 4: federal law enforcement officers vehicle, so many agents will just say, well,
Speaker 4: we'll build a case and then they'll develop over time
Speaker 4: and have to prosecute this individual rather than just putting
Speaker 4: the handcuffs on them. And that's a cultural problem.
Speaker 1: You mentioned that taking it down, you know, something like
Speaker 1: ricover something something like that would take time. Can you,
Speaker 1: as best as you can explain it to a more
Speaker 1: unlike me? How much time? Why so much time? Why
Speaker 1: is this such a long complicated process? And I know
Speaker 1: you're right that it is. I mean, I know all
Speaker 1: about the mafia takedowns and things like that. It's not
Speaker 1: a week long process. But why does it take so long?
Speaker 4: Well, I mean you have to go through the processes
Speaker 4: that are due to everyone to do processes, So you
Speaker 4: would need to send SI poenas for bank records and
Speaker 4: ultimately build yourself up to getting a search warrant and
Speaker 4: then also targeting individuals and knowing what where you need
Speaker 4: to actually take the investigation, and ultimately it's going to
Speaker 4: require people who are willing to cooperate with the government
Speaker 4: because the numbers and the figures inside the bank accounts
Speaker 4: are going to be helpful. But you know, unless you
Speaker 4: have somebody who's able to interpret that for you and
Speaker 4: has that inside knowledge, you're really going to be burdened
Speaker 4: to meet the beyond a reasonable doubt where you to
Speaker 4: actually take something to a trial. So that's why you
Speaker 4: know you reference the al capones of bringing down the mafia.
Speaker 4: Ultimately it was his accountant too, had to come forward
Speaker 4: and explain it to the federal investigators in that case.
Speaker 4: And you know, the communists or nothing if not complete
Speaker 4: true believers in what they are doing, and being able
Speaker 4: to flip one or two of them is a challenge.
Speaker 1: Speaking with the friend former FBI special agent, talking to
Speaker 1: him about taking down these groups. You mentioned federal prosecutors
Speaker 1: and how they've been working on federal law enforcement. Now
Speaker 1: these federal law enforcement agencies are almost it almost it
Speaker 1: seems newtered from the outside looking in. Is that something
Speaker 1: that can be changed with a change in leadership or
Speaker 1: is this such an I mean, what I'm asking Steve is,
Speaker 1: am I fifty years old and all I've ever done
Speaker 1: is eat donuts and not work out, and now I
Speaker 1: have to get back in shape and it's just going
Speaker 1: to be a brutally long process. Or am I you
Speaker 1: know almost there, but I need six months of hard work.
Speaker 4: I think the latter is completely possible because there's a
Speaker 4: tremendous amount of discretion from your US attorney's offices as
Speaker 4: to what sort of cases they take. And I mean,
Speaker 4: and just for your audience's awareness, a financial crime that
Speaker 4: is less than one million dollars from a federal prosecutor
Speaker 4: will likely be declined. They won't take it, so it
Speaker 4: could be even larger. In a larger city like a Chicago.
Speaker 4: I mean, they would take a one million dollar fraud
Speaker 4: case and say, look, we've got bigger fish to fry here,
Speaker 4: so you're gonna have to take that to the local prosecutor.
Speaker 4: But that's Cook County and they're dealing with lots of murders,
Speaker 4: so in essence, those cases are just never addressed. So
Speaker 4: a US attorney who's appointed by the President, they could
Speaker 4: get that mandate. They could get to the frontline prosecutors
Speaker 4: and essentially tell them what sort of cases they have
Speaker 4: to take and what cases they should refer to the local,
Speaker 4: the county, or the state prosecutors that case. So it
Speaker 4: is a prioritization issue than the added challenge though you
Speaker 4: also have is for the assistant United States Attorneys. Those
Speaker 4: are big people that are actually going to court. They're
Speaker 4: not politically appointed, so many of them come from political left.
Speaker 4: Their sympathies are going to be with a lot of
Speaker 4: these individuals who are out there tearing up the streets.
Speaker 4: You're just going to have to engage in what the
Speaker 4: Deputy director of the FBI has talked about, and that's
Speaker 4: personnal warfare. You're going to have to eliminate those people
Speaker 4: and bring in others who are more willing to do
Speaker 4: what the American people said a mandate for last November,
Speaker 4: and that's to address the crimes of violent crimes that
Speaker 4: we're seeing across the country.
Speaker 1: Steve, I'm going to ask the lamest, most open ended
Speaker 1: question in the world before we get to the whistleblower stuff.
Speaker 1: But you mentioned, you know, a million dollars. The US
Speaker 1: Attorney's going to decline it then gets kicked down to
Speaker 1: local if you're in the wrong jurisdiction, they just never
Speaker 1: address it. What percentage of major crimes are just never
Speaker 1: even prosecuted or attempted to be prosecuted in this country?
Speaker 4: Oh, it's the vast majority of crimes. And we're in
Speaker 4: a situation where it's just sheer numbers. You've got thirty
Speaker 4: eight thousand employees that an FBI, fourteen thousand agents, less
Speaker 4: than half of them are actually working on criminal matters.
Speaker 4: So then just look at the volume of people and
Speaker 4: evildoers who are out there, and then the robust law
Speaker 4: enforcement that you're hoping is going to be one to
Speaker 4: take that up at a local level. And so many
Speaker 4: of these matters are just turned over to them or
Speaker 4: just zero filed and said we'll get them another day,
Speaker 4: or even if they are large in scope, the apparatus
Speaker 4: that we have is just not able to engage it.
Speaker 4: I mean the Nigerian print scheme that was basically allowed
Speaker 4: to exist for years on end until one enterprising agent said, Okay, fine,
Speaker 4: I'm going to run this down as far as we
Speaker 4: can take it. But it's too all. Too often it's
Speaker 4: on the shoulders of one person who's just willing to
Speaker 4: put in the work man.
Speaker 1: That is unbelievably sobering. But I'm glad I know that now. Okay, Steve,
Speaker 1: I obviously don't have to tell you, but FBI whistle
Speaker 1: blowers underneath Joe Biden, like yourself, gave up their entire
Speaker 1: careers to expose the naked corruption of the Biden administration
Speaker 1: and specifically the FBI and their conduct. What is as
Speaker 1: much as you can tell understand them, maybe things you
Speaker 1: cannot tell. What is the update on Steve Friend, garrett
Speaker 1: O Boyle and every Marcus Kyle up? What is the
Speaker 1: update on you getting an FBI badge? Again?
Speaker 4: I don't have an update at the moment. You know,
Speaker 4: we were sxiously waiting that we'd get some sort of resolution.
Speaker 4: As it stands, Marcus Allen is the only person that
Speaker 4: came forward within the Bide administration whistleblowers from the FBI
Speaker 4: who was able to negotiate a deal with the DJ
Speaker 4: With the FBI, he was reinstated on the understanding that
Speaker 4: he would immediately resign and receive his back pay, and
Speaker 4: he's also still fighting to get that. He was reinstated, resigned,
Speaker 4: and then now there is a hold up with getting
Speaker 4: his retirement account. There's for the rest of us, we're
Speaker 4: sort of sitting in this limbo situation. We don't know
Speaker 4: what our future holds for us. You know, I'm at
Speaker 4: nine hundred and ninety five days since I was removed.
Speaker 4: Garrett of Boyle is one week behind me, so he
Speaker 4: will both likely be at a thousand days here in
Speaker 4: the next two weeks, and sort of waiting to see
Speaker 4: if there is a spot for us or if it's
Speaker 4: just going to be an understing where we can move on.
Speaker 4: But you know, i'mlike the other guys, like the irs guys,
Speaker 4: where there is a resolution. The FBI seems to be
Speaker 4: lagging behind.
Speaker 1: Okay, I just wanted everybody to hear that. Steve Friend,
Speaker 1: thank you, my brother. I appreciate you very much.
Speaker 4: Thanks. Jesse, appreciate it. Littie always brought me.
Speaker 1: It is the Jesse Kelly Show. Reminding you you can
Speaker 1: email the show Jesse Jesse Kellyshow dot com. Never fear
Speaker 1: the fast is almost over. We're gonna hammer some cheese
Speaker 1: steaks at the end of this and we're gonna be
Speaker 1: just fine. But I'll tell you I've had something else
Speaker 1: on my mind before we get back to the politics.
Speaker 1: It's been on my mind a lot lately. You know,
Speaker 1: it's probably pride, I'd guess that's what it is. But
Speaker 1: human beings, all of us, we want to We want
Speaker 1: to be acknowledged when we do something well, don't we
Speaker 1: don't you when you do something great in school or
Speaker 1: or sports, or work, or maybe you made a great dinner,
Speaker 1: or don't you want to hey mom, that was delicious,
Speaker 1: Hey Bill, great job in the office. That human beings
Speaker 1: want to be acknowledged when they work hard and do
Speaker 1: something great. It's human nature. And I'll tell you I'm
Speaker 1: no different. I have never well it never's probably putting
Speaker 1: it a strong way. It's probably been thirty plus years
Speaker 1: since anybody acknowledged how great I am at dodgeball. People
Speaker 1: don't think about it. They just never acknowledge it. And
Speaker 1: when I tell people about it, it's like they think
Speaker 1: I'm kidding that I don't know how to play dodgeball.
Speaker 1: Here's where people make the mistake. They look at me
Speaker 1: and they see that I'm six', eight So i'd be
Speaker 1: a big. Target and they find out That i'm, slow
Speaker 1: SO i can't get out of the, way and they
Speaker 1: think to. Themselves you're. Lying you're not great at. Dodgeball
Speaker 1: that's a. Lie but here's where people miss. It they
Speaker 1: forget that in, dodgeball it's not necessarily a game of.
Speaker 1: Dodging that's just in the. Name it's a game of.
Speaker 1: Throwing in, Catching i'm an excellent, thrower And i'm an
Speaker 1: even better. CATCHER i don't have to dodge the ball
Speaker 1: you throw at. ME i will catch the ball and
Speaker 1: then you're. Out in, fact in, dodgeball you want to
Speaker 1: catch the. Ball you don't want to dodge. It because
Speaker 1: you catch, it he's out and you didn't even have
Speaker 1: to hit him with the. Ball and then you get
Speaker 1: it two for one because his boys are laughing at.
Speaker 1: Him ah. Haha now you're, out and then, boom you
Speaker 1: bunk one right off his buddy's. Face two for one.
Speaker 1: Gone you removed him from the board with your incredible catching,
Speaker 1: skills BECAUSE i have amazingly big, hands you remove him
Speaker 1: from the, board you bounce one off his buddy's. Face
Speaker 1: you just took out. Two understanding that plus my natural
Speaker 1: catching skills is what made me the dodgeball PLAYER i am,
Speaker 1: Today and nobody has ever acknowledged, it and All i'm,
Speaker 1: saying is something would be? Nice? What why are you
Speaker 1: shaking your? Head? Chris some sort of a. Look if
Speaker 1: it's not a if it's not a, STATUE i get.
Speaker 1: In what about a? Trophy what about a? Plaque what about?
Speaker 1: Look how about a simple? JESSE i admire your? Skills What? Chris?
Speaker 1: What why DON'T i buy my? OWN i? Will in,
Speaker 1: fact NOW i Think i'm going, to just BECAUSE i
Speaker 1: can tell you don't want me. To, Now i'm going
Speaker 1: to IF i have to acknowledge, me because nobody else
Speaker 1: will acknowledge. Me i'm not above. That i'm not above.
Speaker 1: That i'm above other people when it comes to playing,
Speaker 1: dodgeball But i'm not above. That What? Chris about one
Speaker 1: more thing on the education? System why do we have
Speaker 1: a bunch of people in this country who think?
Speaker 3: THIS i remember That california was part Of.
Speaker 5: Mexico all of the southwest Is, mexico so the roots
Speaker 5: are really deep in that.
Speaker 1: Region, Headline indiana teacher resigns after wearing eight six four
Speaker 1: Seven trump shirt on a school. Trip we have a
Speaker 1: bunch of people who believe these things because they've grown
Speaker 1: up In america's education, system and they've been taught forever
Speaker 1: That america, sucks That america is. Evil where they learn,
Speaker 1: it they learned School. Jesse this guy, Says Leatherneck actually
Speaker 1: Combat marines in la is. Great if they don't have a.
Speaker 1: Leash what happens if they aren't allowed to respond to?
Speaker 1: Violence been, there done that In? IRAQ seni? Five, BROTHER someenti?
Speaker 1: Five my, Man, well he brings up an excellent. Point
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter who you bring. In you bring in The, marines,
Speaker 1: GOOD i want them. There you want to smash these, protesters,
Speaker 1: GOOD i want them. Smashed what are you allowing or
Speaker 1: not allowing them to? Do because we had our TROOPS
Speaker 1: i Mean Iraq afghanistan in situations where they were told
Speaker 1: they had to be shot at first before they could shoot,
Speaker 1: back just insane combat engagement. Things NOW i realize we're
Speaker 1: not In Iraq, afghanistan AND i realized we don't want
Speaker 1: The marines going in and mowing a bunch of people.
Speaker 1: Down that's not WHAT i, Want that's not what you.
Speaker 1: Want but are they gonna have live? Ammunition what's the?
Speaker 1: Authority what are the rules of? Engagement and don't think
Speaker 1: these guys aren't painfully aware of the fact that there's
Speaker 1: a bunch of filthy comedies in this country who would
Speaker 1: love to destroy their careers and throw them in a federal.
Speaker 1: Prison they know, that they know. That are we going
Speaker 1: to turn these guys loose in a way they can
Speaker 1: protect themselves and protect the. COMMUNITY i hope, so AND
Speaker 1: i have to Assume Trump Pete hagseeth are going to do.
Speaker 4: So