WEBVTT

1
00:00:20.239 --> 00:00:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, folks. The video you're about to watch is

2
00:00:23.000 --> 00:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>getting a little old now. I think I've made it

3
00:00:25.320 --> 00:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>in the spring of twenty twenty four, but I kept

4
00:00:27.760 --> 00:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>it as a Patreon only video for quite some time.

5
00:00:31.160 --> 00:00:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I mainly did that because this video is quite unlike

6
00:00:34.280 --> 00:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>most of the others I've done. It's about a body

7
00:00:37.000 --> 00:00:39.799
<v Speaker 1>of research rather than an in depth analysis of a

8
00:00:39.840 --> 00:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>single case. I'm sure I'll receive a little backlash from

9
00:00:43.399 --> 00:00:46.799
<v Speaker 1>some people, but you can't always make everyone happy. The

10
00:00:46.840 --> 00:00:49.880
<v Speaker 1>reason I made it was to answer questions I've consistently

11
00:00:49.920 --> 00:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>gotten regarding Missing four point one and my opinion on it.

12
00:00:53.640 --> 00:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>It's something that's been asking me so many times that

13
00:00:56.079 --> 00:00:58.399
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was necessary to build an in depth

14
00:00:58.439 --> 00:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>answer to it. That's this video. I imagine by now

15
00:01:02.359 --> 00:01:06.159
<v Speaker 1>most of my subscribers will be surprised by absolutely nothing

16
00:01:06.200 --> 00:01:09.079
<v Speaker 1>in this but you still may find it interesting, as

17
00:01:09.079 --> 00:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>it covers a lot of cases in quick succession, and

18
00:01:12.120 --> 00:01:15.079
<v Speaker 1>many of them I've never talked about before. I did

19
00:01:15.239 --> 00:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>edit out a lot of the original intro because it

20
00:01:17.680 --> 00:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>was way too long. It was like fifteen minutes of

21
00:01:20.439 --> 00:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>me explaining why I made this video. I think I

22
00:01:23.159 --> 00:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>can sum up the cuts a lot quicker by simply

23
00:01:25.719 --> 00:01:28.439
<v Speaker 1>saying I don't want to be pointing out anyone else's

24
00:01:28.480 --> 00:01:32.319
<v Speaker 1>mistakes or errors without acknowledging my own, because I've made plenty,

25
00:01:32.719 --> 00:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>especially in the early days of this channel. I'll just

26
00:01:35.719 --> 00:01:38.799
<v Speaker 1>throw a list of mine in the description. Also, I

27
00:01:38.959 --> 00:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>was a big believer in missing four on one back

28
00:01:41.319 --> 00:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>when I started all this. If you've been around since

29
00:01:43.840 --> 00:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, you know that my early stuff is riddled

30
00:01:47.000 --> 00:01:50.159
<v Speaker 1>with bigfoot and the paranormal. It wasn't until I really

31
00:01:50.200 --> 00:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>started doing in depth research on some of these missing

32
00:01:53.120 --> 00:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>four on one cases that I kind of became red

33
00:01:56.079 --> 00:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>pilled to the fact that they're just not as strange

34
00:01:58.760 --> 00:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>or unusual as I I thought they were. There was

35
00:02:01.640 --> 00:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a gradual turn from believer to more of a skeptic,

36
00:02:05.640 --> 00:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and it was not intentional anyway. I'll stop yapping for now.

37
00:02:10.199 --> 00:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to the video. Hey there, folks, this is

38
00:02:15.439 --> 00:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a video I wasn't sure i'd ever make. But at

39
00:02:18.400 --> 00:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>some point it almost feels unfair to you, the viewer

40
00:02:21.639 --> 00:02:24.719
<v Speaker 1>if I don't. From the very beginning of this channel,

41
00:02:24.759 --> 00:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I've gotten comments or emails asking questions about missing for

42
00:02:28.360 --> 00:02:32.199
<v Speaker 1>one one. Now these questions or comments have certainly evolved

43
00:02:32.240 --> 00:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>over time. Nowadays it seems to manifest as why do

44
00:02:35.840 --> 00:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you bash Missing four one one. I realize that people

45
00:02:39.439 --> 00:02:42.879
<v Speaker 1>get these misconceptions because I've always kind of tiptoed around

46
00:02:42.919 --> 00:02:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the subject of Missing four one one, because I don't

47
00:02:45.759 --> 00:02:47.759
<v Speaker 1>want anyone who is a fan to feel like they

48
00:02:47.759 --> 00:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>have to pick a side. But at a certain point,

49
00:02:50.199 --> 00:02:53.719
<v Speaker 1>it almost feels irresponsible to not talk about Missing four

50
00:02:53.800 --> 00:02:57.439
<v Speaker 1>one one directly because it is so many people's introduction

51
00:02:57.560 --> 00:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>into the missing person genre. Give credit to Missing four

52
00:03:01.639 --> 00:03:05.439
<v Speaker 1>one one and David Politis for popularizing the genre of

53
00:03:05.520 --> 00:03:09.479
<v Speaker 1>strange missing persons cases now, just in case some viewers

54
00:03:09.520 --> 00:03:12.759
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what Missing for one one is. It

55
00:03:12.840 --> 00:03:16.159
<v Speaker 1>is essentially a body of work created by David Politis

56
00:03:16.199 --> 00:03:18.719
<v Speaker 1>in the form of books and movies that presents a

57
00:03:18.719 --> 00:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>long list of missing persons cases that are supposed to

58
00:03:22.000 --> 00:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>be mysterious, unexplainable, or maybe even paranormal. It is a

59
00:03:26.680 --> 00:03:30.479
<v Speaker 1>hugely popular subject with a large and dedicated fan base.

60
00:03:30.919 --> 00:03:33.159
<v Speaker 1>I was a big fan for a long time. I

61
00:03:33.199 --> 00:03:36.039
<v Speaker 1>always felt that David Politics came across as a very

62
00:03:36.120 --> 00:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>sincere and trustworthy individual. The cases presented in Missing four

63
00:03:40.400 --> 00:03:42.879
<v Speaker 1>one one claim to be selected based on a set

64
00:03:42.919 --> 00:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>of exclusionary criteria, meaning that the presence of any one

65
00:03:46.840 --> 00:03:52.439
<v Speaker 1>of these items mental illness, voluntary disappearance, criminal activity, animal

66
00:03:52.479 --> 00:03:56.639
<v Speaker 1>predation would disqualify a case from being included under the

67
00:03:56.680 --> 00:04:00.319
<v Speaker 1>Missing four one one umbrella. This list is important and

68
00:04:00.360 --> 00:04:03.759
<v Speaker 1>we will return to it now. Generally the cases have

69
00:04:03.800 --> 00:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>an air of mystery about them. And with that said,

70
00:04:07.080 --> 00:04:10.439
<v Speaker 1>this channel has never been about bashing Missing four one one,

71
00:04:10.879 --> 00:04:13.479
<v Speaker 1>and this video is not intended to do that. Either.

72
00:04:14.000 --> 00:04:17.879
<v Speaker 1>When you know people believe in stories that are verifiably inaccurate,

73
00:04:18.319 --> 00:04:20.759
<v Speaker 1>do you do nothing because the people seem to like

74
00:04:20.879 --> 00:04:23.839
<v Speaker 1>and enjoy and trust the source, or do you try

75
00:04:23.879 --> 00:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to show them the evidence they're not seen, even if

76
00:04:26.839 --> 00:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it's uncomfortable. I guess in this video I'm trying to

77
00:04:30.079 --> 00:04:32.759
<v Speaker 1>do the latter. The end goal of this video is

78
00:04:32.879 --> 00:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>not to get people to stop reading, watching, or listening

79
00:04:36.040 --> 00:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to Missing four one one. In fact, I think you

80
00:04:39.040 --> 00:04:42.759
<v Speaker 1>should do those things. Get information from every source you can,

81
00:04:43.319 --> 00:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and if my point of view is considered the skeptical one,

82
00:04:46.439 --> 00:04:49.399
<v Speaker 1>I would encourage you to seek out the opposite see

83
00:04:49.399 --> 00:04:52.720
<v Speaker 1>whose information makes more sense to you. It's always important

84
00:04:52.720 --> 00:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to know the arguments of the other side. So if

85
00:04:55.600 --> 00:04:59.079
<v Speaker 1>you're wondering what I personally think about Missing four one one,

86
00:04:59.399 --> 00:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>because it's a question I often get, well, my answer

87
00:05:02.759 --> 00:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>is that I have a lot of concerns. These concerns

88
00:05:05.519 --> 00:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>revolve solely around the way information is portrayed in Missing

89
00:05:08.839 --> 00:05:11.759
<v Speaker 1>four one one and other information that is not mentioned

90
00:05:11.759 --> 00:05:14.639
<v Speaker 1>at all. So I'll come right out and say I

91
00:05:14.680 --> 00:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>don't believe in Missing four one one. What does that mean.

92
00:05:18.360 --> 00:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>It means I don't believe that the long list of

93
00:05:20.800 --> 00:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>cases presented in Missing four one one as having strange, paranormal,

94
00:05:25.079 --> 00:05:29.720
<v Speaker 1>or unexplainable elements are all legitimate. Now, there are some

95
00:05:29.920 --> 00:05:33.319
<v Speaker 1>genuinely strange and unexplainable cases in the Missing four one

96
00:05:33.399 --> 00:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>one archive, but it is my contention that the vast

97
00:05:36.879 --> 00:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>majority of these cases do not even meet Missing for

98
00:05:40.199 --> 00:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>one one's own standards for qualifying a case. People also

99
00:05:44.639 --> 00:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>ask why I don't like David Politis. The simple answer

100
00:05:48.920 --> 00:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>is I don't like nor dislike him. I don't know him.

101
00:05:52.399 --> 00:05:54.879
<v Speaker 1>This video is not going to be about David Politis

102
00:05:54.920 --> 00:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>as a person. It's going to be about his research.

103
00:05:58.199 --> 00:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>So this is not intended to be an end datment

104
00:06:00.439 --> 00:06:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of him. So much as the information presented in his

105
00:06:03.480 --> 00:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>books and movies, and criticism of research is essential for

106
00:06:07.800 --> 00:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>refinement of future research into the missing person's genre. If

107
00:06:12.000 --> 00:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>someone builds off the work I have done and learns

108
00:06:14.879 --> 00:06:17.959
<v Speaker 1>new details or develops new theories I haven't thought of,

109
00:06:18.439 --> 00:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>then that is a good thing. It is refining the

110
00:06:21.120 --> 00:06:25.079
<v Speaker 1>understanding of whatever case that is. In this video, we

111
00:06:25.120 --> 00:06:27.199
<v Speaker 1>are going to go over a bunch of cases, some

112
00:06:27.360 --> 00:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I've previously covered and even some I haven't made videos on,

113
00:06:31.319 --> 00:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>but that I've researched independently. That way, you can see

114
00:06:34.800 --> 00:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>why I don't believe in missing for one one, and

115
00:06:37.720 --> 00:06:41.079
<v Speaker 1>then you can judge for yourself whether that's a reasonable

116
00:06:41.160 --> 00:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>position to hold or not. And I'll also have a

117
00:06:44.480 --> 00:06:46.759
<v Speaker 1>public video I can just link to all the people

118
00:06:46.759 --> 00:06:49.639
<v Speaker 1>who ask me questions about what I think about missing

119
00:06:49.680 --> 00:06:52.399
<v Speaker 1>four one one. So I will walk you through the

120
00:06:52.480 --> 00:06:55.959
<v Speaker 1>exact same things I went through, case by case, and

121
00:06:56.000 --> 00:06:57.879
<v Speaker 1>you can see if you come out the other end

122
00:06:57.920 --> 00:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>feeling the same, you're getting the crash course. In this video, throughout,

123
00:07:02.079 --> 00:07:03.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do my best to show you the

124
00:07:03.800 --> 00:07:06.399
<v Speaker 1>sources for everything, so that you don't have to take

125
00:07:06.439 --> 00:07:09.319
<v Speaker 1>my word for anything. You can go look at it yourself,

126
00:07:09.439 --> 00:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>which I strongly encourage you to do. Anyway, now that

127
00:07:12.639 --> 00:07:15.279
<v Speaker 1>we have that long winded preamble out of the way,

128
00:07:15.720 --> 00:07:18.079
<v Speaker 1>let's go over some missing four to one one cases

129
00:07:18.079 --> 00:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that I think shouldn't be missing four one one cases.

130
00:07:21.959 --> 00:07:24.439
<v Speaker 1>So one of the main issues I have with these

131
00:07:24.519 --> 00:07:27.639
<v Speaker 1>cases is that some of them seem to heavily skew

132
00:07:27.720 --> 00:07:31.279
<v Speaker 1>in the direction of making a case seem paranormal by

133
00:07:31.360 --> 00:07:34.319
<v Speaker 1>hinting at the possibility of something like a cryptid or

134
00:07:34.480 --> 00:07:38.439
<v Speaker 1>UFOs being involved. And to be honest, I've often felt

135
00:07:38.480 --> 00:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that bigfoot is being inferred in many of these cases,

136
00:07:41.720 --> 00:07:44.439
<v Speaker 1>but perhaps that's only because I was aware Politis was

137
00:07:44.480 --> 00:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a bigfoot researcher before starting Missing four one one. Let

138
00:07:48.639 --> 00:07:53.079
<v Speaker 1>me show you what I mean. Jackie Copeland. I covered

139
00:07:53.079 --> 00:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the case of Jackie Copeland some time ago. It was

140
00:07:56.199 --> 00:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>an incident back in May of nineteen fifty. He was

141
00:07:59.199 --> 00:08:01.519
<v Speaker 1>a two year old boy spending the day with his

142
00:08:01.560 --> 00:08:06.759
<v Speaker 1>family in Pleasantville, Pennsylvania. At some point, Jackie wandered off. Now,

143
00:08:06.920 --> 00:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Jackie's father worked for an oil company and his family

144
00:08:10.240 --> 00:08:13.639
<v Speaker 1>was staying on land leased from the company. Once Jackie

145
00:08:13.759 --> 00:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>was reported missing, a ton of people came in to

146
00:08:16.240 --> 00:08:20.879
<v Speaker 1>assist in the search, including many volunteers from the oil company. Fortunately,

147
00:08:21.079 --> 00:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Jackie was found quickly and returned to his family. But

148
00:08:24.439 --> 00:08:26.959
<v Speaker 1>the important part in the Missing four one one book

149
00:08:26.959 --> 00:08:29.959
<v Speaker 1>that I want to draw your attention to is this quote.

150
00:08:30.279 --> 00:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>An article in the Logan's Port Press dated May seventeen,

151
00:08:33.879 --> 00:08:37.279
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty had an interview with the Copelands and heard

152
00:08:37.440 --> 00:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Jackie's rendition of what occurred during his night in the woods.

153
00:08:41.600 --> 00:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>The press wanted to hear how the boy got to

154
00:08:43.799 --> 00:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>his location in the swamp, what he had to drink

155
00:08:46.559 --> 00:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>or eat, and how he kept warm. Jackie first was

156
00:08:50.039 --> 00:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>asked why he left the picnic, and here is his quote.

157
00:08:53.600 --> 00:08:56.679
<v Speaker 1>He saw something peering at him from behind a big tree.

158
00:08:56.960 --> 00:09:01.200
<v Speaker 1>When he approached, the creature scampered into the brush. Jackie

159
00:09:01.240 --> 00:09:04.799
<v Speaker 1>didn't explain anything more about leaving the picnic at that point.

160
00:09:05.440 --> 00:09:08.799
<v Speaker 1>The article goes on to say he recounted in child

161
00:09:08.840 --> 00:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>talk his adventure in an awful blackness, peopled by a

162
00:09:12.159 --> 00:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>great throbbing giant and a tall friendly tree, and wild

163
00:09:16.320 --> 00:09:20.159
<v Speaker 1>animals howling in the distance, and the unfamiliar shouts of

164
00:09:20.240 --> 00:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>strangers prowling nearby. Okay, so when you hear those excerpts,

165
00:09:24.919 --> 00:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>what comes to mind? Obviously it's not very descriptive, but

166
00:09:28.559 --> 00:09:30.879
<v Speaker 1>it might evoke some kind of image in your mind.

167
00:09:31.399 --> 00:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>The child sees a creature watching him that runs off

168
00:09:34.240 --> 00:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>into the brush, and shortly thereafter young Jackie goes missing.

169
00:09:38.519 --> 00:09:41.919
<v Speaker 1>Later he encounters a great throbbing giant. It gives the

170
00:09:41.960 --> 00:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>case an added element of something creepier paranormal. But the

171
00:09:46.039 --> 00:09:48.559
<v Speaker 1>paragraph I just read to you from Missing four one

172
00:09:48.679 --> 00:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>one takes the newspaper article almost entirely out of context.

173
00:09:53.559 --> 00:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's look at the same Logan's port Press article that

174
00:09:56.240 --> 00:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>politis referenced and compare the two. The search went on

175
00:10:05.080 --> 00:10:08.759
<v Speaker 1>all night. Then about nine o'clock, an oil field worker

176
00:10:08.919 --> 00:10:11.279
<v Speaker 1>dropped out of a group of searchers to go to

177
00:10:11.320 --> 00:10:14.519
<v Speaker 1>a nearby pump house to make some adjustments in the machinery.

178
00:10:14.960 --> 00:10:17.879
<v Speaker 1>He saw something peering at him from behind a big tree.

179
00:10:18.200 --> 00:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>When he approached, the creature scampered into the brush. It

180
00:10:21.919 --> 00:10:26.399
<v Speaker 1>was a badly frightened oil smeared little Jackie. By Now

181
00:10:26.399 --> 00:10:30.679
<v Speaker 1>you're probably going, wait what, But that's right. The actual

182
00:10:30.759 --> 00:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>newspaper reference for this story has an entirely different context,

183
00:10:35.759 --> 00:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>while the Missing four one one version somehow attributes this

184
00:10:38.919 --> 00:10:42.559
<v Speaker 1>description to Jackie Copeland telling the story of how he disappeared.

185
00:10:43.039 --> 00:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>The newspaper is actually telling the tale of the searcher

186
00:10:46.039 --> 00:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>who found an oil, smeared Jackie Copeland, hiding behind a

187
00:10:49.879 --> 00:10:53.879
<v Speaker 1>tree and scampering into the brush. Nobody saw any creature.

188
00:10:54.240 --> 00:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Jackie was the supposed creature. The issue here is that

189
00:10:58.320 --> 00:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the missing four to one one book two sentences out

190
00:11:01.519 --> 00:11:05.039
<v Speaker 1>of an entire paragraph that is telling a story. Now,

191
00:11:05.159 --> 00:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>if we give the benefit of the doubt and say

192
00:11:07.159 --> 00:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>this mishapen is entirely by accident, then what are the

193
00:11:10.559 --> 00:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>chances that this accident also happens to make the story

194
00:11:13.879 --> 00:11:18.399
<v Speaker 1>more mysterious, creepy or paranormal. Something to think about. And

195
00:11:18.440 --> 00:11:21.399
<v Speaker 1>if you're stuck on the actual description that Jackie gave

196
00:11:21.440 --> 00:11:24.559
<v Speaker 1>of the awful blackness, the throbbing giant, and the tall

197
00:11:24.639 --> 00:11:28.159
<v Speaker 1>friendly tree, Let's remember that Jackie was two years old

198
00:11:28.200 --> 00:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>when this happened. Let's talk about the case of Eloise Lindsay.

199
00:11:33.519 --> 00:11:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Let me preface this by saying that Politis writes that

200
00:11:36.720 --> 00:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>this case is definitely one of the strangest stories in

201
00:11:40.120 --> 00:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the entire book. Let's see twenty two year old Eloise

202
00:11:44.279 --> 00:11:47.919
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay disappeared in nineteen eighty nine in Table Rock State Park,

203
00:11:48.000 --> 00:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina. This is another case I've covered on the

204
00:11:51.200 --> 00:11:54.399
<v Speaker 1>Channel back in the day, and probably not very well either,

205
00:11:54.519 --> 00:11:57.879
<v Speaker 1>but I never focused on the discrepancies. If you read

206
00:11:57.879 --> 00:12:00.919
<v Speaker 1>the Missing four on one Eastern US version of the story,

207
00:12:01.000 --> 00:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>starting on page one thirty three, the story goes something

208
00:12:04.440 --> 00:12:07.679
<v Speaker 1>like this. Eloise was on a long hike, doing seven

209
00:12:07.759 --> 00:12:10.919
<v Speaker 1>days alone before meeting a friend. On the third day

210
00:12:10.960 --> 00:12:13.399
<v Speaker 1>of her hike, she started being followed by a group

211
00:12:13.440 --> 00:12:16.639
<v Speaker 1>of men who meant to harm her. Eloise drops her

212
00:12:16.679 --> 00:12:19.440
<v Speaker 1>backpack and equipment and runs off trail to try and

213
00:12:19.480 --> 00:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>avoid these men. She was eventually found in a delirious

214
00:12:23.320 --> 00:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>state by a hunter after sixteen days missing. Afterwards, she

215
00:12:27.600 --> 00:12:30.159
<v Speaker 1>was taken to safety, but up until the moment she

216
00:12:30.279 --> 00:12:32.799
<v Speaker 1>was found, she claimed that she was being chased through

217
00:12:32.840 --> 00:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the woods by a group of men she never saw.

218
00:12:36.200 --> 00:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>She then told her story to reporters from her hospital bed.

219
00:12:39.840 --> 00:12:43.679
<v Speaker 1>Politus finishes the story by saying, quote, my question for

220
00:12:43.720 --> 00:12:46.399
<v Speaker 1>Eloise and her mother is what did the girl see?

221
00:12:46.840 --> 00:12:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Her mother indicates she saw something, and what she saw

222
00:12:50.200 --> 00:12:52.639
<v Speaker 1>is something that she obviously does not want to make

223
00:12:52.759 --> 00:12:57.279
<v Speaker 1>public for whatever reason. At the end of Eloise Lindsay's story,

224
00:12:57.559 --> 00:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Politis refers the reader to the Denis Martin case and

225
00:13:00.480 --> 00:13:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the existence of the fabled wild men that live in

226
00:13:03.480 --> 00:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the Smokies, obviously making a connection between what Eloise experienced

227
00:13:08.399 --> 00:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and the supposed feral wild men from the Denis Martin case.

228
00:13:12.559 --> 00:13:15.399
<v Speaker 1>And don't worry, we'll hit the Denis Martin case. The

229
00:13:15.480 --> 00:13:18.559
<v Speaker 1>main takeaway from the Missing four one one presentation of

230
00:13:18.639 --> 00:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>this case is this Eloise was stoked by some strange

231
00:13:23.120 --> 00:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and shadowy people for over two weeks. There is no

232
00:13:26.600 --> 00:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>mention of the group of men ever doing anything other

233
00:13:29.639 --> 00:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>than silently following Eloise in the woods, and the only

234
00:13:33.240 --> 00:13:36.799
<v Speaker 1>speculation Politis puts forth about who they could be is

235
00:13:36.840 --> 00:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the supposed wild men. Why does this matter, Well, let's

236
00:13:40.840 --> 00:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>look at the reporting. At the time. Miss Lindsay said

237
00:13:45.440 --> 00:13:48.879
<v Speaker 1>she knew rescuers were searching for her, but also believed

238
00:13:48.960 --> 00:13:51.559
<v Speaker 1>men working in the area were bent on harming her.

239
00:13:52.000 --> 00:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>She said the men had dogs, monitors for tracking down

240
00:13:55.279 --> 00:14:01.159
<v Speaker 1>living animals, whistles, guns, tractors, cars, mopeds, boats. I feel

241
00:14:01.159 --> 00:14:03.159
<v Speaker 1>like if they had been part of the search party,

242
00:14:03.519 --> 00:14:06.519
<v Speaker 1>they would have been calling out Eloise, we're here to

243
00:14:06.519 --> 00:14:09.799
<v Speaker 1>get you. At some points they came very close to

244
00:14:09.879 --> 00:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>finding me, but it was never at the right time.

245
00:14:13.159 --> 00:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Other articles mentioned that Eloise could hear the men using

246
00:14:16.559 --> 00:14:20.039
<v Speaker 1>walkie talkies and even talking about her. If you read

247
00:14:20.039 --> 00:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the articles, you get the sense that Eloise may be

248
00:14:22.720 --> 00:14:25.679
<v Speaker 1>suffering from some sort of mental illness. She went in

249
00:14:25.720 --> 00:14:28.879
<v Speaker 1>for a psych evaluation after she left the hospital. It

250
00:14:28.919 --> 00:14:32.519
<v Speaker 1>really seems like she was perhaps paranoid and eventually determined

251
00:14:32.559 --> 00:14:35.519
<v Speaker 1>that the searchers were actually men out to cause her harm.

252
00:14:36.039 --> 00:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>The main question is why doesn't Missing four one one

253
00:14:39.080 --> 00:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>mention any of this. Is it because you can't push

254
00:14:42.039 --> 00:14:45.279
<v Speaker 1>a feral wild man theory. If the missing person says

255
00:14:45.320 --> 00:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>that they were being chased by cars, mopads, and boats,

256
00:14:49.120 --> 00:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Seriously consider what it does to the perception of a

257
00:14:52.080 --> 00:14:55.759
<v Speaker 1>case when you say she was being chased by mysterious

258
00:14:55.840 --> 00:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>men she never saw, versus she knew searchers were in

259
00:15:00.240 --> 00:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the area, but she felt she was being chased by

260
00:15:03.159 --> 00:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>men using dogs, guns, tractors, cars, mopeds, and boats. The

261
00:15:08.559 --> 00:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>two scenarios give off very different vibes. One that's mysterious

262
00:15:13.480 --> 00:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and one that's not at all. In the end, this

263
00:15:16.559 --> 00:15:20.879
<v Speaker 1>case should have been excluded due to mental illness. Karen

264
00:15:20.960 --> 00:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Cooney Karen Cooney was a fifteen year old girl in Corey, Pennsylvania,

265
00:15:26.879 --> 00:15:30.399
<v Speaker 1>who disappeared in nineteen sixty eight. The missing four one

266
00:15:30.519 --> 00:15:33.559
<v Speaker 1>one story goes that Karen was in her backyard doing

267
00:15:33.679 --> 00:15:36.679
<v Speaker 1>chores when her family heard her scream. When they went

268
00:15:36.720 --> 00:15:40.559
<v Speaker 1>to check on her, Karen had vanished. A search was initiated,

269
00:15:40.559 --> 00:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and a little over a day later, Karen was found

270
00:15:43.440 --> 00:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>in a dazed state. She told authorities she was chased

271
00:15:46.960 --> 00:15:49.639
<v Speaker 1>from her home by a big man with a knife

272
00:15:49.919 --> 00:15:52.679
<v Speaker 1>who followed her into the woods a long ways until

273
00:15:52.759 --> 00:15:56.559
<v Speaker 1>she fell asleep again a story of someone being chased

274
00:15:56.559 --> 00:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>through the woods. So what's the deal with this case, Well,

275
00:16:00.320 --> 00:16:04.879
<v Speaker 1>let's read some additional information that newspapers talked about. You see,

276
00:16:04.919 --> 00:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>authorities quickly found out that Karen was making things up.

277
00:16:08.759 --> 00:16:11.919
<v Speaker 1>The FBI got involved when there was allegations of kidnapping,

278
00:16:12.320 --> 00:16:14.919
<v Speaker 1>and when the state police talked to her, she told

279
00:16:14.960 --> 00:16:17.279
<v Speaker 1>them that she had been very nervous and high strung

280
00:16:17.360 --> 00:16:19.919
<v Speaker 1>lately and decided to go for a walk in the

281
00:16:19.919 --> 00:16:23.799
<v Speaker 1>woods near her home. Her scream which triggered the theory

282
00:16:23.879 --> 00:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that Karen may have been kidnapped as she was hanging

283
00:16:26.480 --> 00:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the family wash occurred when she entered a wooded area

284
00:16:30.279 --> 00:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and had to cross an electric fence, which shocked her.

285
00:16:33.720 --> 00:16:36.639
<v Speaker 1>So the whole Karen Cooney story is kind of just

286
00:16:36.679 --> 00:16:40.159
<v Speaker 1>a fabrication. But in the same Missing four one one book,

287
00:16:40.480 --> 00:16:44.559
<v Speaker 1>Politis compares this case to that of Eloise Lindsay, saying

288
00:16:45.120 --> 00:16:47.799
<v Speaker 1>this case is not the only case in which strange

289
00:16:47.879 --> 00:16:51.879
<v Speaker 1>looking men are described in the woods associated with a disappearance.

290
00:16:52.559 --> 00:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>He then refers to Eloise's story and ends the paragraph

291
00:16:56.120 --> 00:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>with it's an odd coincidence that both Eloise Lindsay and

292
00:17:00.559 --> 00:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Karen Cooney described being chased by men and they don't

293
00:17:04.839 --> 00:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>or won't supply descriptions. Why is it just me or

294
00:17:09.039 --> 00:17:13.279
<v Speaker 1>are both those sentences kind of contradictory? Anyway, We actually

295
00:17:13.359 --> 00:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>know that Eloise did describe the people chasing her almost

296
00:17:16.960 --> 00:17:20.519
<v Speaker 1>too well, while Karen was just never chased at all.

297
00:17:20.920 --> 00:17:23.400
<v Speaker 1>But these cases in Missing four one one worked to

298
00:17:23.480 --> 00:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>create a narrative that there are these strange people in

299
00:17:26.279 --> 00:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the woods. That Karen Cooney case should have been excluded

300
00:17:30.039 --> 00:17:35.880
<v Speaker 1>due to voluntary disappearance. Let's talk Kevin Die. Kevin Dye

301
00:17:36.000 --> 00:17:38.640
<v Speaker 1>was a nine year old boy who disappeared in nineteen

302
00:17:38.720 --> 00:17:42.519
<v Speaker 1>seventy one from a cabin in Wyoming. Missing four one

303
00:17:42.599 --> 00:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>one mentions that Kevin is disabled, but doesn't go into

304
00:17:46.000 --> 00:17:50.160
<v Speaker 1>detail about just how disabled he is. Kevin was playing

305
00:17:50.240 --> 00:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>pingpong outside with family when the ball was hit out

306
00:17:53.480 --> 00:17:57.680
<v Speaker 1>into the trees and brush. Naturally, Kevin chased after the ball.

307
00:17:58.119 --> 00:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>He ran into the woods and did not return. A

308
00:18:01.039 --> 00:18:04.160
<v Speaker 1>search began, and some searchers said that they saw Kevin,

309
00:18:04.200 --> 00:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>but he ran off into the woods. Food was left

310
00:18:07.160 --> 00:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>out for him and was taken quickly, with no culprit

311
00:18:10.039 --> 00:18:13.519
<v Speaker 1>having been found. Searchers also found a lean two shelter

312
00:18:13.599 --> 00:18:16.079
<v Speaker 1>made of pine bows, as well as some stick and

313
00:18:16.200 --> 00:18:19.519
<v Speaker 1>stone constructions that his parents said looked like the stuff

314
00:18:19.559 --> 00:18:23.359
<v Speaker 1>that Kevin would make. Kevin was actually found after eleven

315
00:18:23.440 --> 00:18:28.079
<v Speaker 1>days alongside a creek, laying down exhausted. He had lost

316
00:18:28.160 --> 00:18:31.279
<v Speaker 1>twenty pounds, a quarter of his body weight, and a

317
00:18:31.359 --> 00:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>doctor said that he believed Kevin ate nothing the entire time.

318
00:18:35.319 --> 00:18:38.119
<v Speaker 1>The Missing four one one entry ends by saying that

319
00:18:38.240 --> 00:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Kevin was not telling anyone what happened during his time

320
00:18:41.799 --> 00:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>in the woods. Keep that last sentence in mind for

321
00:18:45.119 --> 00:18:48.599
<v Speaker 1>just a minute now. To me, this case isn't very

322
00:18:48.640 --> 00:18:51.759
<v Speaker 1>strange to begin with, but it gets even less strange

323
00:18:51.799 --> 00:18:54.920
<v Speaker 1>when you learn that Kevin was so disabled that he

324
00:18:54.960 --> 00:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>couldn't really speak at all. He was barely communicative, but

325
00:18:59.279 --> 00:19:02.880
<v Speaker 1>he had more energy than any kid we can probably imagine.

326
00:19:03.319 --> 00:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>One newspaper said that he had the physical condition of

327
00:19:06.759 --> 00:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a top athlete, But who can become a screaming, flailing

328
00:19:10.559 --> 00:19:14.559
<v Speaker 1>animal when he fails to make himself understood? In fact,

329
00:19:14.960 --> 00:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the newspaper's report that Kevin was so hyperactive that his

330
00:19:18.880 --> 00:19:22.319
<v Speaker 1>parents had to give him nine tranquilizers a day and

331
00:19:22.400 --> 00:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>it still wasn't enough. This poor kid was so unbelievably

332
00:19:26.839 --> 00:19:29.559
<v Speaker 1>energetic that they had to give him enough meds to

333
00:19:29.680 --> 00:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>kill a horse and it still didn't work. Is it

334
00:19:33.039 --> 00:19:35.799
<v Speaker 1>any wonder that he just ran off into the forest.

335
00:19:36.240 --> 00:19:39.160
<v Speaker 1>His parents said that they're yelling and screaming for him,

336
00:19:39.200 --> 00:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>probably drove him into the forest. Even more, All of

337
00:19:42.440 --> 00:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the constructs that were found in the forest were probably Kevin,

338
00:19:45.759 --> 00:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>as confirmed by the parents, and the missing food was

339
00:19:49.039 --> 00:19:53.079
<v Speaker 1>probably Kevin as well. You see, the doctor assumed Kevin

340
00:19:53.119 --> 00:19:56.279
<v Speaker 1>didn't eat because he lost so much weight. But consider

341
00:19:56.400 --> 00:19:59.599
<v Speaker 1>that we have an ultra hyperactive kid who is now

342
00:19:59.640 --> 00:20:03.559
<v Speaker 1>off his nine tranquilizers a day, this kid was probably

343
00:20:03.599 --> 00:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>burning many thousands of calories per day while lost. Even

344
00:20:07.960 --> 00:20:10.680
<v Speaker 1>with some food, he still would have lost that weight.

345
00:20:11.119 --> 00:20:13.799
<v Speaker 1>There was also some local people who reported that they

346
00:20:13.799 --> 00:20:16.839
<v Speaker 1>had break ins at their cabins where someone stole their

347
00:20:16.920 --> 00:20:19.839
<v Speaker 1>jars of peanut butter. As it turns out, peanut butter

348
00:20:20.039 --> 00:20:23.400
<v Speaker 1>was Kevin's favorite food. It seems readily apparent to me

349
00:20:23.839 --> 00:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that this hyperactive child spent ten to eleven days running

350
00:20:27.319 --> 00:20:31.039
<v Speaker 1>around building things and stealing peanut butter until he eventually

351
00:20:31.079 --> 00:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>lost a quarter of his body weight, at which point

352
00:20:33.519 --> 00:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>he finally collapsed and was found by searchers. I'm not

353
00:20:37.039 --> 00:20:39.400
<v Speaker 1>sure why this is a missing four one one case.

354
00:20:39.839 --> 00:20:44.079
<v Speaker 1>It should have been excluded based on mental illness. Moving on,

355
00:20:44.279 --> 00:20:46.799
<v Speaker 1>I know Missing four one one has often made mention

356
00:20:46.960 --> 00:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of the children who disappear and show up many miles

357
00:20:49.960 --> 00:20:54.880
<v Speaker 1>away or are found at incredible elevations. Okay, if true,

358
00:20:55.079 --> 00:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it also sounds amazing to me, So let's take a

359
00:20:58.039 --> 00:21:01.039
<v Speaker 1>look at some of those cases. I got this list

360
00:21:01.119 --> 00:21:04.559
<v Speaker 1>from Missing four one one Devil's in the Details page

361
00:21:04.599 --> 00:21:07.400
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and sixty two. This is a list of

362
00:21:07.480 --> 00:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>missing people by distance traveled. So let's look at the

363
00:21:11.079 --> 00:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>number one on that list, Jack Hodges, who apparently traveled

364
00:21:15.119 --> 00:21:19.119
<v Speaker 1>fifty miles at only seven years old. Here's the story,

365
00:21:20.200 --> 00:21:24.839
<v Speaker 1>Jack Hodges. Seven year old Jack Hodges was with his

366
00:21:24.960 --> 00:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>family visiting a ranch thirty miles to the north of

367
00:21:28.039 --> 00:21:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the city of Seligman and northern Arizona. At some point,

368
00:21:31.720 --> 00:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and for some reason, Jack disappeared along with his dog.

369
00:21:35.680 --> 00:21:38.160
<v Speaker 1>The dog returned a few hours later, but there was

370
00:21:38.200 --> 00:21:41.519
<v Speaker 1>no Jack. A search was immediately initiated to try and

371
00:21:41.599 --> 00:21:44.319
<v Speaker 1>find the boy, as temperatures in the area were getting

372
00:21:44.319 --> 00:21:47.839
<v Speaker 1>down to fourteen degrees at night. Two days into the search,

373
00:21:48.160 --> 00:21:51.039
<v Speaker 1>Jack was found by two cowboys on the slopes of

374
00:21:51.079 --> 00:21:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Mount Floyd, which lies about ten miles to the northeast

375
00:21:54.440 --> 00:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>of Seligman. A newspaper article referenced in Missing four one

376
00:21:58.359 --> 00:22:02.640
<v Speaker 1>one states searchers estimated the warmly clad youngster must have

377
00:22:02.680 --> 00:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>walked some fifty miles, mostly in circles. Jack was in

378
00:22:07.279 --> 00:22:10.400
<v Speaker 1>relatively good condition. He was taken to a hospital and

379
00:22:10.480 --> 00:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>released a day later. Politis ends Jack's case with these lines.

380
00:22:15.200 --> 00:22:18.559
<v Speaker 1>I will continue to present these cases to exemplify a

381
00:22:18.599 --> 00:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>point we can't ignore what seems illogical we can't attempt

382
00:22:22.680 --> 00:22:26.279
<v Speaker 1>to reconcile in our minds what seems uncomfortable to believe.

383
00:22:26.839 --> 00:22:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Some pretty cryptic words there. Politis makes a point to

384
00:22:30.240 --> 00:22:32.880
<v Speaker 1>say that there was no water in the area and

385
00:22:32.960 --> 00:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that only a little snow was on the mountain. He

386
00:22:35.799 --> 00:22:38.160
<v Speaker 1>states that the idea that Jack could have eaten this

387
00:22:38.279 --> 00:22:41.799
<v Speaker 1>snow does not make sense. Keep that last part in mind.

388
00:22:42.119 --> 00:22:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Politas says, it makes no sense that Jack could have

389
00:22:45.480 --> 00:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>eaten snow. So what's the reality of this situation? Did

390
00:22:49.400 --> 00:22:52.759
<v Speaker 1>little Jack Hodges really walk fifty miles in two days?

391
00:22:53.559 --> 00:22:57.039
<v Speaker 1>Probably not. Let's think about it. This is literally just

392
00:22:57.160 --> 00:23:00.519
<v Speaker 1>something a searcher told a newspaper and for who knows

393
00:23:00.559 --> 00:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>what reason, and he was probably exaggerating. Jack disappeared from

394
00:23:05.039 --> 00:23:08.079
<v Speaker 1>a ranch that was about thirty miles north of Seligman

395
00:23:08.519 --> 00:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and was found at a location about ten miles northeast

396
00:23:11.720 --> 00:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of Seligman. Jack could have walked twenty to twenty five

397
00:23:15.359 --> 00:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>miles in order to get to Mount Floyd. I'll also

398
00:23:18.359 --> 00:23:21.680
<v Speaker 1>add that one newspaper says that Jack was found near

399
00:23:21.759 --> 00:23:26.039
<v Speaker 1>Mount Floyd in an area about twenty miles north of Seligman.

400
00:23:26.559 --> 00:23:29.640
<v Speaker 1>If accurate, Jack would have only been ten miles away

401
00:23:29.680 --> 00:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>from the ranch that he disappeared from. But believe it

402
00:23:32.799 --> 00:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>or not, the distance is totally besides the point in

403
00:23:36.240 --> 00:23:39.640
<v Speaker 1>this case. It's literally not an issue at all. Even

404
00:23:39.680 --> 00:23:42.839
<v Speaker 1>if he did walk fifty miles, it still would be

405
00:23:42.960 --> 00:23:48.880
<v Speaker 1>virtually irrelevant. Unbelievably impressive, yes, but irrelevant. You might notice

406
00:23:48.920 --> 00:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that in the Missing four on one book there's no

407
00:23:51.440 --> 00:23:55.119
<v Speaker 1>quotes sharing what Jack had to say regarding his disappearance.

408
00:23:55.599 --> 00:23:58.880
<v Speaker 1>This gives the story its air of mystery. What could

409
00:23:58.920 --> 00:24:01.160
<v Speaker 1>have happened to him while he was lost? That he

410
00:24:01.319 --> 00:24:05.400
<v Speaker 1>traveled an impossible fifty miles, And this also might lead

411
00:24:05.440 --> 00:24:07.519
<v Speaker 1>you to think that he said nothing at all about

412
00:24:07.519 --> 00:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the incident. But Jack Hodges told his story to reporters

413
00:24:11.799 --> 00:24:14.559
<v Speaker 1>and it sheds a lot of light on things. When

414
00:24:14.599 --> 00:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>asked how he survived the freezing temperatures of the waist,

415
00:24:18.519 --> 00:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Jack responded, I curled up under a tree and slept

416
00:24:22.240 --> 00:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>all night. Remember Jack was warmly clad. He goes on

417
00:24:26.319 --> 00:24:28.039
<v Speaker 1>to say that he was taking his dog on a

418
00:24:28.079 --> 00:24:31.079
<v Speaker 1>long walk and just kept walking. After leaving the ranch,

419
00:24:31.720 --> 00:24:35.119
<v Speaker 1>Jack continued, I saw a deer and antelope, but I

420
00:24:35.160 --> 00:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a gun. I ate dirty snow that was

421
00:24:38.039 --> 00:24:41.039
<v Speaker 1>on the north side of the mountain. Oops. You see,

422
00:24:41.279 --> 00:24:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Jack is clearly not like your modern jen alpha child.

423
00:24:44.960 --> 00:24:48.759
<v Speaker 1>This is a rough, gruff, nineteen fifties country boy who

424
00:24:48.839 --> 00:24:51.839
<v Speaker 1>wanted to turn his disappearance into a little hunting trip.

425
00:24:52.279 --> 00:24:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting to think he just breezed through the fifty miles.

426
00:24:55.240 --> 00:24:58.039
<v Speaker 1>After all, he slept under a tree. He wished he

427
00:24:58.079 --> 00:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>had a gun to hunt some game, and he ate

428
00:25:00.519 --> 00:25:03.839
<v Speaker 1>mountain snow for water. The point here is, do you

429
00:25:04.000 --> 00:25:06.400
<v Speaker 1>think this should be a missing four to one one case?

430
00:25:06.920 --> 00:25:10.039
<v Speaker 1>The child told his story and it didn't involve aliens

431
00:25:10.119 --> 00:25:13.519
<v Speaker 1>or Bigfoot or any mystery at all. Really, Jack himself

432
00:25:13.559 --> 00:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>never asserted he walked fifty miles. This is merely the

433
00:25:17.000 --> 00:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>story of a tough kid who got lost for two days.

434
00:25:20.759 --> 00:25:23.599
<v Speaker 1>While we're on the subject, let's talk about another, even

435
00:25:23.640 --> 00:25:27.160
<v Speaker 1>more incredible distance story that for some reason didn't make

436
00:25:27.160 --> 00:25:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the list in Devils in the Details, even though the

437
00:25:29.920 --> 00:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>distance traveled was stated to be seventy five miles. Let's

438
00:25:34.240 --> 00:25:38.039
<v Speaker 1>talk about the Daughters of John Hammond. In May of

439
00:25:38.079 --> 00:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>eighteen ninety one, the four and eight year old daughters

440
00:25:41.039 --> 00:25:44.119
<v Speaker 1>of John Hammond left their home six miles north of

441
00:25:44.160 --> 00:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the town of Bedford to go visit their sister, who

442
00:25:47.240 --> 00:25:50.400
<v Speaker 1>lived a mile away. They visited their sister and then

443
00:25:50.480 --> 00:25:54.279
<v Speaker 1>began walking home. They never made it back. A large

444
00:25:54.319 --> 00:25:57.279
<v Speaker 1>search was initiated to find the two girls. On the

445
00:25:57.319 --> 00:26:00.839
<v Speaker 1>fourth day of searching, they found the youngest girl, unconscious

446
00:26:00.839 --> 00:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>but still alive. She was found fifteen miles from the

447
00:26:04.240 --> 00:26:07.319
<v Speaker 1>point she disappeared. This was good, but they still had

448
00:26:07.359 --> 00:26:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to find the other sister. She was found on the

449
00:26:09.960 --> 00:26:13.480
<v Speaker 1>tenth day of the search, but unfortunately she was already deceased.

450
00:26:13.799 --> 00:26:16.359
<v Speaker 1>The Missing four one one book quotes an article that

451
00:26:16.440 --> 00:26:19.519
<v Speaker 1>says the girl was found ten miles north of Running,

452
00:26:19.640 --> 00:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Blaine County, fully seventy five miles from the place where

453
00:26:23.279 --> 00:26:27.279
<v Speaker 1>the children lost their way. That is quite incredible if true.

454
00:26:27.559 --> 00:26:31.599
<v Speaker 1>So let's have a look at the newspaper in question. Now, incidentally,

455
00:26:31.640 --> 00:26:33.839
<v Speaker 1>that quote I just shared for Missing four one one

456
00:26:33.920 --> 00:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>actually as a typo, as the newspaper does not state

457
00:26:37.000 --> 00:26:39.519
<v Speaker 1>the girl was found north of Running, but actually a

458
00:26:39.519 --> 00:26:42.599
<v Speaker 1>town called Dunning. So we know where the girl left

459
00:26:42.680 --> 00:26:46.119
<v Speaker 1>from and where she ended up. She started six miles

460
00:26:46.160 --> 00:26:50.319
<v Speaker 1>north of Thedford and ended up ten miles north of Dunning. Now,

461
00:26:50.680 --> 00:26:55.079
<v Speaker 1>as the crow flies, that distance is about twenty five miles. Obviously,

462
00:26:55.200 --> 00:26:58.119
<v Speaker 1>she likely didn't walk a straight line, so the distance

463
00:26:58.200 --> 00:27:00.759
<v Speaker 1>is more. But the idea that if this girl walks

464
00:27:00.799 --> 00:27:06.440
<v Speaker 1>seventy five miles is completely unconfirmed and highly unlikely. Why

465
00:27:06.440 --> 00:27:09.119
<v Speaker 1>couldn't she have walked thirty miles across the ten days

466
00:27:09.200 --> 00:27:11.559
<v Speaker 1>she was missing. My main point here is that this

467
00:27:11.680 --> 00:27:16.400
<v Speaker 1>seventy five miles number is entirely fabricated and totally unreliable.

468
00:27:16.799 --> 00:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>It comes from one newspaper article that just got reprinted

469
00:27:20.000 --> 00:27:23.400
<v Speaker 1>by all the other newspapers. This case could very well

470
00:27:23.480 --> 00:27:26.839
<v Speaker 1>qualify as a missing four one one case. It has

471
00:27:26.839 --> 00:27:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that element of mystery where we don't know why they disappeared,

472
00:27:30.319 --> 00:27:33.920
<v Speaker 1>but the supposed eye catching fact this seventy five miles

473
00:27:34.319 --> 00:27:37.799
<v Speaker 1>is more than likely a typo or something. Reliability in

474
00:27:37.880 --> 00:27:41.359
<v Speaker 1>newspapers from the eighteen hundreds has always been an issue.

475
00:27:41.519 --> 00:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>How would anyone know she walked seventy five miles instead

476
00:27:45.000 --> 00:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of twenty five? There was simply no way to confirm

477
00:27:48.039 --> 00:27:51.599
<v Speaker 1>that unless they followed tracks for seventy five miles, which

478
00:27:51.640 --> 00:27:54.759
<v Speaker 1>I can guarantee did not happen. So those are two

479
00:27:54.799 --> 00:27:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of the largest distances traveled by children in missing four

480
00:27:58.519 --> 00:28:01.920
<v Speaker 1>one one cases. It was apparent to me after researching them,

481
00:28:01.960 --> 00:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that those distances were not verifiably traveled and also highly

482
00:28:06.039 --> 00:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>unlikely in each situation. I don't want to beat a

483
00:28:08.720 --> 00:28:10.759
<v Speaker 1>dead horse with this, but I feel like I have

484
00:28:10.799 --> 00:28:13.799
<v Speaker 1>to throw an elevation one in here just to satisfy everyone.

485
00:28:13.880 --> 00:28:16.599
<v Speaker 1>So let's do that. Going back to the Devil's in

486
00:28:16.640 --> 00:28:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the Details book, on page three sixty one, we have

487
00:28:19.680 --> 00:28:23.839
<v Speaker 1>a list of children who covered great elevation. Obviously, let's

488
00:28:23.839 --> 00:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>go to the top of the list, which is Jill Hatch,

489
00:28:26.519 --> 00:28:29.839
<v Speaker 1>who traveled up thirty five hundred feet in elevation at

490
00:28:29.920 --> 00:28:34.160
<v Speaker 1>seven years old. Already, it sounds like a supernatural feat,

491
00:28:34.279 --> 00:28:39.319
<v Speaker 1>so let's see what the story is Jill Hatch In

492
00:28:39.440 --> 00:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty seven, Jill Hatch was seven years old when

493
00:28:42.720 --> 00:28:44.559
<v Speaker 1>she left her home with her parents to go on

494
00:28:44.599 --> 00:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a camping trip in Camp Shydeck, California. Camp Shydeck is

495
00:28:48.920 --> 00:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>a small town that sits kind of near the base

496
00:28:51.319 --> 00:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of Reye's Peak, which towers over the area at seventy

497
00:28:54.880 --> 00:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>five hundred feet in elevation. Camp Shydeck sits at about

498
00:28:58.680 --> 00:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight hundred feet in elevation. Keep those two numbers

499
00:29:02.440 --> 00:29:05.519
<v Speaker 1>in mind. Here anyway. While on the trip, Jill went

500
00:29:05.559 --> 00:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>out with her father to do some fishing along with

501
00:29:08.000 --> 00:29:11.319
<v Speaker 1>her dog. The dad spent some time fishing while Jill

502
00:29:11.359 --> 00:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and the dog were just sitting nearby. When he was done,

503
00:29:14.440 --> 00:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>he went to grab Jill, only to find that both

504
00:29:16.920 --> 00:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>her and the dog were gone. A search was immediately

505
00:29:20.240 --> 00:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>started for Jill, but only the dog was found after

506
00:29:23.240 --> 00:29:26.319
<v Speaker 1>it returned to camp on its own. Missing four one

507
00:29:26.400 --> 00:29:30.240
<v Speaker 1>one states that twenty eight hours after Jill disappeared, searchers

508
00:29:30.279 --> 00:29:33.559
<v Speaker 1>were near the summit of Ray's Peak and descending when

509
00:29:33.599 --> 00:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>they saw Jill on the side of a hill seventy

510
00:29:36.480 --> 00:29:39.839
<v Speaker 1>five hundred feet up, which is essentially at the very

511
00:29:39.960 --> 00:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>top of Raya's Peak, and she was lying in fresh snow.

512
00:29:44.160 --> 00:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Politis states that Jill was found five miles from her

513
00:29:47.240 --> 00:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>camp and thirty five hundred feet up in elevation, a

514
00:29:51.039 --> 00:29:56.480
<v Speaker 1>truly incredible distance. Unfortunately, Jill was already dead from exposure

515
00:29:56.519 --> 00:29:58.759
<v Speaker 1>when they found her. She would have had to cross

516
00:29:58.799 --> 00:30:02.359
<v Speaker 1>two steep ridges to reach this point. So what's the

517
00:30:02.400 --> 00:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>problem with this one, you might ask? Well, to start,

518
00:30:05.559 --> 00:30:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea where Politis got this story of

519
00:30:08.480 --> 00:30:12.440
<v Speaker 1>searchers coming down from Ray's Peak and somehow finding Jill

520
00:30:12.559 --> 00:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>up there near the top. He cites no source, and

521
00:30:16.079 --> 00:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>just think about it, why would searchers even be up

522
00:30:19.000 --> 00:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>there looking for a small child. Almost every article you

523
00:30:22.559 --> 00:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>find on Jill Hatch's case says that she was found

524
00:30:25.480 --> 00:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>between half a mile to a mile and a half

525
00:30:28.279 --> 00:30:31.240
<v Speaker 1>from Camp. I looked at a ton of articles on

526
00:30:31.240 --> 00:30:34.640
<v Speaker 1>this case, and only one claims she was found five

527
00:30:34.720 --> 00:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>miles away. But the problem with the five miles figure

528
00:30:38.279 --> 00:30:41.079
<v Speaker 1>is that it doesn't make sense. Five miles from Camp

529
00:30:41.119 --> 00:30:44.559
<v Speaker 1>Shideck puts you past Ray's Peak. But even if you

530
00:30:44.640 --> 00:30:48.319
<v Speaker 1>accept this anomalous figure, the story told in this article

531
00:30:48.480 --> 00:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>is completely different from Missing four one one. It says

532
00:30:51.720 --> 00:30:54.839
<v Speaker 1>her body was found huddled in some bushes, not laying

533
00:30:54.920 --> 00:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>on the snow at the top of Ray's Peak. The

534
00:30:57.440 --> 00:31:01.119
<v Speaker 1>most important newspaper I've found on this case comes from

535
00:31:01.119 --> 00:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the Ventura County Star, which actually shares details from those

536
00:31:04.680 --> 00:31:08.799
<v Speaker 1>who found her. Russell Princeton, a butcher from New Quiama,

537
00:31:09.079 --> 00:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>was one of the searchers covering a hillside above the creek,

538
00:31:12.519 --> 00:31:15.599
<v Speaker 1>making his way over snow covered rocks and brush when

539
00:31:15.640 --> 00:31:18.279
<v Speaker 1>he came upon the little limp body of the girl.

540
00:31:18.720 --> 00:31:21.039
<v Speaker 1>She apparently had begun to make her way up the

541
00:31:21.119 --> 00:31:25.559
<v Speaker 1>slope where she could see greater distance when exhaustion overcame her, and,

542
00:31:25.640 --> 00:31:28.799
<v Speaker 1>sleepy from the bitter cold, slumped down in the snow

543
00:31:28.920 --> 00:31:32.119
<v Speaker 1>and collapsed. Reading a little earlier in the article, we

544
00:31:32.240 --> 00:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>learned that this searcher was in Snail Canyon when he

545
00:31:35.000 --> 00:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>found Jill Hatch, so he was covering the hillside above

546
00:31:38.279 --> 00:31:42.079
<v Speaker 1>the creek in Snail Canyon, not climbing to the top

547
00:31:42.119 --> 00:31:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of Ray's Peak. Let's look at where Snail Canyon is

548
00:31:45.680 --> 00:31:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in relation to Camp Shydeck. The highlighted area is Snail Canyon,

549
00:31:50.400 --> 00:31:53.359
<v Speaker 1>and it does not extend southward more than about two

550
00:31:53.400 --> 00:31:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and a half miles from Camp Shydick. But keep in

551
00:31:56.920 --> 00:31:59.599
<v Speaker 1>mind that Jill was found about half a mile to

552
00:31:59.680 --> 00:32:02.279
<v Speaker 1>a mile and a half from the camp, so she

553
00:32:02.400 --> 00:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>wasn't very deep into the canyon, which coincidentally agrees with

554
00:32:06.240 --> 00:32:09.519
<v Speaker 1>what ninety nine percent of newspapers say about where Jill

555
00:32:09.640 --> 00:32:12.720
<v Speaker 1>was found. It also means Jill could not have climbed

556
00:32:12.799 --> 00:32:16.720
<v Speaker 1>higher than the canyon walls let's say one thousand feet.

557
00:32:16.839 --> 00:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>But judging by the article of the fellow who found her,

558
00:32:20.319 --> 00:32:23.359
<v Speaker 1>she died very shortly after even attempting to climb up

559
00:32:23.400 --> 00:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the sides of the canyon, So the total elevation Jill

560
00:32:26.519 --> 00:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>climbed is likely next to nothing, and certainly not even

561
00:32:30.119 --> 00:32:34.119
<v Speaker 1>close to thirty five hundred feet. In my opinion, the

562
00:32:34.200 --> 00:32:37.359
<v Speaker 1>story as told in Missing four one one uses cherry

563
00:32:37.400 --> 00:32:40.119
<v Speaker 1>picked numbers and also does not cite a source for

564
00:32:40.200 --> 00:32:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Jill being found at the top of Reya's Peak. The

565
00:32:43.000 --> 00:32:46.559
<v Speaker 1>only newspaper report that even remotely sounded like what's written

566
00:32:46.559 --> 00:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in Missing four one one describes two male searchers who

567
00:32:50.200 --> 00:32:52.839
<v Speaker 1>were coming down a slope when they spotted Jill lying

568
00:32:52.920 --> 00:32:55.519
<v Speaker 1>on the snow. One of them also had the last

569
00:32:55.599 --> 00:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>name Princeton, and I bet he's the son of the

570
00:32:58.000 --> 00:33:01.000
<v Speaker 1>man who gave a much better description of the discovery.

571
00:33:01.599 --> 00:33:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Neither iterations describe the searchers being a top rays peak.

572
00:33:05.960 --> 00:33:10.039
<v Speaker 1>It simply doesn't make sense, and Jill Hatch's case represents

573
00:33:10.119 --> 00:33:14.240
<v Speaker 1>absolutely nothing in terms of elevation climbed by a child.

574
00:33:15.400 --> 00:33:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about Dennis Martin. I know fans of the

575
00:33:18.920 --> 00:33:22.000
<v Speaker 1>channel probably don't need a Dennis Martin refresher. I have

576
00:33:22.039 --> 00:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of videos on the subject, but it is

577
00:33:24.279 --> 00:33:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a hugely important case because the Missing four one one

578
00:33:27.599 --> 00:33:30.240
<v Speaker 1>version of this story has been told a thousand times

579
00:33:30.319 --> 00:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>on various radio programs and other venues, and I would

580
00:33:34.000 --> 00:33:36.799
<v Speaker 1>venture a guess that the majority of people familiar with

581
00:33:36.880 --> 00:33:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the case only know the Missing four one one version,

582
00:33:40.400 --> 00:33:43.559
<v Speaker 1>but I'll keep it brief. Dennis Martin disappeared in the

583
00:33:43.559 --> 00:33:47.279
<v Speaker 1>Great Smoky Mountains National Park in June of nineteen sixty nine.

584
00:33:47.720 --> 00:33:50.799
<v Speaker 1>He was visiting the park with his grandfather, father, and

585
00:33:51.039 --> 00:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>brother for a family reunion of sorts. The plan was

586
00:33:54.440 --> 00:33:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to meet up at a place called Spence Field. Along

587
00:33:57.440 --> 00:34:00.519
<v Speaker 1>the way, the Martins encountered an unrelated family with the

588
00:34:00.519 --> 00:34:03.279
<v Speaker 1>same last name. They got along well, and the two

589
00:34:03.359 --> 00:34:06.759
<v Speaker 1>groups decided to make the trek together. After arriving at

590
00:34:06.799 --> 00:34:10.360
<v Speaker 1>spence Field, Dennis disappeared after the group of kids hatched

591
00:34:10.360 --> 00:34:13.159
<v Speaker 1>a plot to scare some of the adults by jumping

592
00:34:13.159 --> 00:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>out from behind trees. Unfortunately, Dennis was wearing a bright

593
00:34:17.079 --> 00:34:19.039
<v Speaker 1>red shirt, so they told him to go a different

594
00:34:19.079 --> 00:34:23.280
<v Speaker 1>direction than everyone else. He was never seen again. According

595
00:34:23.280 --> 00:34:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to Missing four to one one. Hours after Dennis disappeared,

596
00:34:26.519 --> 00:34:28.760
<v Speaker 1>a man named Harold Key was in the park with

597
00:34:28.840 --> 00:34:32.360
<v Speaker 1>his family in the Rohans Creek area. They wandered into

598
00:34:32.360 --> 00:34:35.159
<v Speaker 1>the woods looking for bears. While out there, they saw

599
00:34:35.199 --> 00:34:38.559
<v Speaker 1>a large hairy man or a man wearing animal pelts

600
00:34:38.760 --> 00:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>running through the forest carrying something on its shoulder. This

601
00:34:42.119 --> 00:34:45.320
<v Speaker 1>description seems to be inferring a bigfoot or a wild

602
00:34:45.400 --> 00:34:49.119
<v Speaker 1>man abducted Dennis Martin, missing four one. One claimed Special

603
00:34:49.199 --> 00:34:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Forces green Berets showed up out of nowhere during the

604
00:34:52.000 --> 00:34:55.159
<v Speaker 1>search for Dennis. It is said they carried weapons while

605
00:34:55.199 --> 00:34:58.880
<v Speaker 1>they searched and did not communicate with any other searchers.

606
00:34:59.519 --> 00:35:02.119
<v Speaker 1>Much of this this information comes from an interview that

607
00:35:02.199 --> 00:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Politis and bigfoot researcher Scott Carpenter did with Dennis Martin's father,

608
00:35:06.760 --> 00:35:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Bill Martin. Politis never interviewed the most important witness in

609
00:35:10.719 --> 00:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>this case, however, which was Harold Key, because he says

610
00:35:13.960 --> 00:35:16.480
<v Speaker 1>he was already dead back in twenty ten and twenty

611
00:35:16.519 --> 00:35:19.599
<v Speaker 1>eleven when he was researching for his book. The exact

612
00:35:19.719 --> 00:35:22.679
<v Speaker 1>quote is most of the people involved in this case

613
00:35:22.719 --> 00:35:26.639
<v Speaker 1>have retired or passed away. Mister Key died in twenty ten.

614
00:35:27.119 --> 00:35:29.440
<v Speaker 1>The problem with that story is that it is only

615
00:35:29.480 --> 00:35:33.840
<v Speaker 1>accurate up until Dennis Martin disappears. Harold Key was actually

616
00:35:33.880 --> 00:35:37.639
<v Speaker 1>alive up until twenty nineteen and fortunately he was interviewed

617
00:35:37.679 --> 00:35:40.840
<v Speaker 1>by a police officer named Michael Bouchard before that time.

618
00:35:41.400 --> 00:35:43.519
<v Speaker 1>Harold Key stated that the man he saw in the

619
00:35:43.519 --> 00:35:47.000
<v Speaker 1>woods that day was carrying nothing. There was no child

620
00:35:47.119 --> 00:35:50.079
<v Speaker 1>being carried on anyone's shoulder, nor was the man he

621
00:35:50.119 --> 00:35:53.239
<v Speaker 1>saw a bigfoot or a wild man in animal skins.

622
00:35:53.559 --> 00:35:56.000
<v Speaker 1>He said he saw a disheveled looking man moving through

623
00:35:56.000 --> 00:35:59.079
<v Speaker 1>the forest and then getting into a white vehicle and

624
00:35:59.199 --> 00:36:02.599
<v Speaker 1>driving out of the u S area with haste. Shortly thereafter,

625
00:36:02.880 --> 00:36:05.360
<v Speaker 1>he said he heard someone scream the word help and

626
00:36:05.400 --> 00:36:08.880
<v Speaker 1>then heard an agonizing scream of pain. This version of

627
00:36:08.920 --> 00:36:13.119
<v Speaker 1>the story can actually be verified by contemporary newspaper articles

628
00:36:13.119 --> 00:36:16.039
<v Speaker 1>where Harold Key was interviewed and said the man he

629
00:36:16.079 --> 00:36:19.719
<v Speaker 1>saw left in a white car. Bigfoots and wild men

630
00:36:19.800 --> 00:36:23.239
<v Speaker 1>generally don't drive, as I understand it. Besides that, we

631
00:36:23.360 --> 00:36:25.639
<v Speaker 1>know that the green Berets arrived at the request of

632
00:36:25.679 --> 00:36:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the Park Service because they were training in the nearby

633
00:36:28.480 --> 00:36:32.360
<v Speaker 1>area of Nantahala and they received permission to help. This

634
00:36:32.519 --> 00:36:35.400
<v Speaker 1>record has existed and been available for a long time.

635
00:36:35.920 --> 00:36:39.239
<v Speaker 1>As of twenty twenty four, there are also many photographs

636
00:36:39.239 --> 00:36:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that show the green Berets during the Denis Martin search,

637
00:36:42.320 --> 00:36:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and not a single one is shown carrying a weapon.

638
00:36:45.760 --> 00:36:48.320
<v Speaker 1>If you want more detail than this, I suggest you

639
00:36:48.400 --> 00:36:52.280
<v Speaker 1>check out my past videos on the Denis Martin case. Essentially,

640
00:36:52.599 --> 00:36:56.159
<v Speaker 1>everything about the case that appeared strange and unusual turned

641
00:36:56.159 --> 00:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>out to be incorrect. To sum up, this disappearance was

642
00:37:00.199 --> 00:37:03.599
<v Speaker 1>considered a keystone case in the Missing four one one catalog,

643
00:37:04.039 --> 00:37:05.920
<v Speaker 1>but in the end, when you look at all of

644
00:37:05.920 --> 00:37:09.159
<v Speaker 1>the facts, it appears that Dennis was either kidnapped by

645
00:37:09.199 --> 00:37:13.119
<v Speaker 1>the disheveled man, which would mean criminal activity and disqualify

646
00:37:13.159 --> 00:37:16.960
<v Speaker 1>this case, or Dennis got lost and died from exposure.

647
00:37:17.519 --> 00:37:20.079
<v Speaker 1>None of those options make the case worthy of a

648
00:37:20.239 --> 00:37:24.800
<v Speaker 1>moniker such as unexplainable or paranormal. Let's move on to

649
00:37:24.880 --> 00:37:28.039
<v Speaker 1>something else. I know many people are probably familiar with

650
00:37:28.119 --> 00:37:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Missing four one one because they watched the movies. Perhaps

651
00:37:31.400 --> 00:37:34.559
<v Speaker 1>you're wondering, what, if anything, is wrong with those I

652
00:37:34.559 --> 00:37:36.880
<v Speaker 1>don't want to go over every case in each movie

653
00:37:36.920 --> 00:37:39.599
<v Speaker 1>because that would take some time, but let's just say

654
00:37:39.599 --> 00:37:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that the movies aren't exempt from this problem. Don't get

655
00:37:42.800 --> 00:37:45.159
<v Speaker 1>me wrong, I think Missing four one one The Hunted

656
00:37:45.239 --> 00:37:48.559
<v Speaker 1>is a beautifully made movie. I've watched it many times

657
00:37:48.880 --> 00:37:52.400
<v Speaker 1>It's very well made from an artistic standpoint, but in

658
00:37:52.519 --> 00:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>terms of telling accurate stories, I think it can be

659
00:37:55.840 --> 00:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>seriously lacking in some areas. I'll briefly touch on some

660
00:37:59.639 --> 00:38:02.719
<v Speaker 1>things from each movie. For the first Missing four one

661
00:38:02.760 --> 00:38:05.800
<v Speaker 1>one movie, I remember watching it right when it came out,

662
00:38:05.920 --> 00:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and even then I felt like it didn't really capture

663
00:38:08.519 --> 00:38:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the essence of what Missing four one one was. I

664
00:38:11.480 --> 00:38:14.480
<v Speaker 1>think the only truly mysterious case presented in it was

665
00:38:14.519 --> 00:38:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that of Jared Adadero. The main focus was on Dior

666
00:38:18.039 --> 00:38:20.519
<v Speaker 1>Coons Junior, in a case that I feel has a

667
00:38:20.519 --> 00:38:24.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of indications of foul play. It's still being investigated

668
00:38:24.239 --> 00:38:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to this day. Another case brought up in the movie

669
00:38:27.039 --> 00:38:29.960
<v Speaker 1>was that of Bobby buys Up, a boy who disappeared

670
00:38:29.960 --> 00:38:33.119
<v Speaker 1>while attending a Catholic camp and whose partial remains were

671
00:38:33.199 --> 00:38:36.760
<v Speaker 1>later found. There is strong evidence to indicate that Bobby

672
00:38:36.920 --> 00:38:40.280
<v Speaker 1>was the victim of some very evil camp counselors. The

673
00:38:40.360 --> 00:38:43.599
<v Speaker 1>case is still being investigated to this day, and media

674
00:38:43.639 --> 00:38:46.559
<v Speaker 1>has provided updates in the case as recently as twenty

675
00:38:46.599 --> 00:38:50.039
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. This case should not have been included due

676
00:38:50.079 --> 00:38:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to criminal activity. With regard to Missing four one one,

677
00:38:53.599 --> 00:38:56.119
<v Speaker 1>The hunted There's really two cases that I want to

678
00:38:56.159 --> 00:38:59.920
<v Speaker 1>point out to this movie Stanley Vihill Junior as the first.

679
00:39:00.519 --> 00:39:03.280
<v Speaker 1>If you watch the movie, it tells Stanley's story something

680
00:39:03.360 --> 00:39:06.159
<v Speaker 1>like this. In twenty seventeen, he was out on a

681
00:39:06.199 --> 00:39:09.039
<v Speaker 1>hunting trip with his father and friends when he spotted

682
00:39:09.039 --> 00:39:11.239
<v Speaker 1>a deer as they were driving around in the truck.

683
00:39:11.840 --> 00:39:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Stanley jumps out of the truck, chasing the deer. Bad

684
00:39:15.000 --> 00:39:19.840
<v Speaker 1>weather rolls in and Stanley never returns. A search is initiated,

685
00:39:19.880 --> 00:39:23.719
<v Speaker 1>but it is unsuccessful. Then Stanley is eventually found dead

686
00:39:23.760 --> 00:39:27.440
<v Speaker 1>in the Pecos River months later. This is all suggesting

687
00:39:27.480 --> 00:39:30.039
<v Speaker 1>that we have no idea what could have possibly happened

688
00:39:30.079 --> 00:39:33.239
<v Speaker 1>to Stanley. It makes it sound like Stanley just ran

689
00:39:33.280 --> 00:39:35.880
<v Speaker 1>out of the car and vanished into the woods before

690
00:39:35.920 --> 00:39:40.320
<v Speaker 1>showing up dead. That would be pretty mysterious, but this

691
00:39:40.480 --> 00:39:45.199
<v Speaker 1>is only a fraction of Stanley's story. Before disappearing, Stanley

692
00:39:45.280 --> 00:39:48.039
<v Speaker 1>was in the truck drinking with the other men. Maybe

693
00:39:48.079 --> 00:39:52.119
<v Speaker 1>a minor detail, but still potentially important. The day after

694
00:39:52.239 --> 00:39:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Stanley went missing, he actually showed up on the doorstep

695
00:39:55.440 --> 00:39:59.559
<v Speaker 1>of a woman named Eumelia Gonzalez. Eumelia found him knocking

696
00:39:59.599 --> 00:40:01.679
<v Speaker 1>on her or late at night, and she had no

697
00:40:01.760 --> 00:40:04.440
<v Speaker 1>idea who he was. She said that he was armed

698
00:40:04.440 --> 00:40:07.000
<v Speaker 1>with a nine millimeter pistol on his hip, and he

699
00:40:07.039 --> 00:40:09.400
<v Speaker 1>told a story about his truck being stuck in the

700
00:40:09.440 --> 00:40:12.920
<v Speaker 1>mountains and that men were chasing after him. Stanley asked

701
00:40:12.920 --> 00:40:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to use her phone, but because Eumelia was scared, she

702
00:40:15.960 --> 00:40:18.159
<v Speaker 1>told him he could not, and she then told him

703
00:40:18.199 --> 00:40:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to leave, which he did. Later on, Eumelia would make

704
00:40:21.400 --> 00:40:25.320
<v Speaker 1>contact with authorities where she identified Stanley Vihill as the

705
00:40:25.400 --> 00:40:28.360
<v Speaker 1>man who knocked on her door. Canines were brought to

706
00:40:28.400 --> 00:40:30.199
<v Speaker 1>her house where they were able to pick up his

707
00:40:30.320 --> 00:40:33.480
<v Speaker 1>scent and track it for a while. Stanley was also

708
00:40:33.679 --> 00:40:36.960
<v Speaker 1>likely captured by a number of game cameras after this incident,

709
00:40:37.119 --> 00:40:40.800
<v Speaker 1>giving us some idea of his path of travel. Stanley's sister,

710
00:40:40.920 --> 00:40:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Darcy Vihill, also believed that men were chasing her brother,

711
00:40:44.639 --> 00:40:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and stated that police told her that his body had

712
00:40:47.000 --> 00:40:50.880
<v Speaker 1>been found with head trauma and broken ribs. Darcy Vihill

713
00:40:50.920 --> 00:40:54.239
<v Speaker 1>provided police with other testimony that she had seen surveillance

714
00:40:54.280 --> 00:40:56.960
<v Speaker 1>tape of men appearing to chase someone who appears to

715
00:40:57.000 --> 00:41:00.480
<v Speaker 1>be Stanley hiding near a gas station. As far as

716
00:41:00.559 --> 00:41:03.679
<v Speaker 1>I know, police never confirmed this report, so I don't

717
00:41:03.719 --> 00:41:07.039
<v Speaker 1>give it the same weight as other evidence. I corresponded

718
00:41:07.079 --> 00:41:09.840
<v Speaker 1>with Darcy back in twenty twenty three, and she still

719
00:41:09.880 --> 00:41:13.159
<v Speaker 1>believes foul play was involved in Stanley's death and she

720
00:41:13.280 --> 00:41:16.719
<v Speaker 1>wants further investigation. But here's the point I want to make.

721
00:41:17.119 --> 00:41:19.000
<v Speaker 1>If you had to guess what was going on in

722
00:41:19.039 --> 00:41:22.360
<v Speaker 1>this case, what would it be for me? I'd say

723
00:41:22.440 --> 00:41:26.039
<v Speaker 1>either foul play or mental illness. Well, let's examine the

724
00:41:26.079 --> 00:41:30.760
<v Speaker 1>missing four one one exclusionary criteria shown in this very movie. Again,

725
00:41:30.840 --> 00:41:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the likely explanation falls within two exclusionary categories. It seems

726
00:41:35.800 --> 00:41:38.079
<v Speaker 1>like this should not be considered a missing for one

727
00:41:38.119 --> 00:41:41.679
<v Speaker 1>one case, but it's still in the movie. All right,

728
00:41:41.760 --> 00:41:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about Aaron Hedges briefly. I made a detailed

729
00:41:45.199 --> 00:41:47.960
<v Speaker 1>video on the topic already, but if you're unfamiliar with

730
00:41:48.000 --> 00:41:50.639
<v Speaker 1>the flaws in this case, I would suggest you go

731
00:41:50.719 --> 00:41:53.599
<v Speaker 1>view it on my channel. Here is an abridged version

732
00:41:53.679 --> 00:41:57.079
<v Speaker 1>as told in the movie. Aaron Hedges went hunting in

733
00:41:57.119 --> 00:42:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the Crazy Mountains with two of his friends. Into their trek,

734
00:42:01.039 --> 00:42:03.599
<v Speaker 1>the group's pack mule bucked a bunch of Aaron's gear,

735
00:42:03.639 --> 00:42:07.039
<v Speaker 1>including a sleeping bag, and it was all lost. Aaron

736
00:42:07.119 --> 00:42:09.079
<v Speaker 1>had hid in a cache of gear at a place

737
00:42:09.079 --> 00:42:11.639
<v Speaker 1>called Sunlight Lake, so he told his friends that he

738
00:42:11.679 --> 00:42:14.440
<v Speaker 1>was going to leave and go get it. Aaron left,

739
00:42:14.519 --> 00:42:17.679
<v Speaker 1>but stayed in radio contact with his friends for some time.

740
00:42:18.239 --> 00:42:20.800
<v Speaker 1>In the last contact they had with him, he told

741
00:42:20.880 --> 00:42:22.559
<v Speaker 1>them that he believed he had missed a turn and

742
00:42:22.599 --> 00:42:26.199
<v Speaker 1>would not be back soon. Aaron's friends eventually shot an

743
00:42:26.199 --> 00:42:29.039
<v Speaker 1>elk and then left the area without him. They told

744
00:42:29.079 --> 00:42:32.039
<v Speaker 1>authorities that when they returned to the trailhead, they received

745
00:42:32.039 --> 00:42:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a delayed text from Aaron saying that he would call

746
00:42:34.559 --> 00:42:38.360
<v Speaker 1>them that night. A brutal snowstorm hits the area and

747
00:42:38.400 --> 00:42:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the search for Aaron eventually begins. They find a place

748
00:42:41.840 --> 00:42:44.559
<v Speaker 1>he appeared to have stayed with a fire pit, some gear,

749
00:42:44.599 --> 00:42:48.599
<v Speaker 1>and his hiking boots. They don't find erin. His backpack

750
00:42:48.639 --> 00:42:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and bow were later found located on the Rhine Ranch,

751
00:42:51.480 --> 00:42:54.159
<v Speaker 1>further down the trail from where his campfire was found.

752
00:42:54.599 --> 00:42:58.639
<v Speaker 1>It was resting against a tree purposefully placed. Aaron's remains

753
00:42:58.639 --> 00:43:00.679
<v Speaker 1>would be found a year later by I guessed from

754
00:43:00.679 --> 00:43:03.519
<v Speaker 1>the sweet Grass Ranch. There was not enough left of

755
00:43:03.599 --> 00:43:06.920
<v Speaker 1>him to determine the cause of death. The sad truth

756
00:43:06.960 --> 00:43:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of this story is that Aaron was quite an alcoholic.

757
00:43:10.119 --> 00:43:13.199
<v Speaker 1>He had a serious problem. He was taking medication to

758
00:43:13.199 --> 00:43:15.880
<v Speaker 1>help kerb his drinking, but it appears it wasn't working

759
00:43:16.000 --> 00:43:19.280
<v Speaker 1>very well. Witness testimony indicates that he went out on

760
00:43:19.320 --> 00:43:21.920
<v Speaker 1>this hunting trip with a crazy plan to try in

761
00:43:22.039 --> 00:43:26.840
<v Speaker 1>detox complications from alcohol, withdrawal in a sudden snowstorm or

762
00:43:26.880 --> 00:43:29.639
<v Speaker 1>what likely led to his death. There was also this

763
00:43:29.719 --> 00:43:32.679
<v Speaker 1>other element of Aaron's hiking boots being found at the

764
00:43:32.679 --> 00:43:35.880
<v Speaker 1>small campsite he made. I talked to this guy who

765
00:43:35.960 --> 00:43:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you might recognize from the movie itself. This is sweet

766
00:43:38.960 --> 00:43:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Grass County Sheriff Roniberg. He told me that it's common

767
00:43:42.360 --> 00:43:45.519
<v Speaker 1>for bowhunters to carry a spare set of hunting moccasins

768
00:43:45.519 --> 00:43:48.800
<v Speaker 1>with them for stalking game. Sheriff Roniberg said that he

769
00:43:48.880 --> 00:43:52.880
<v Speaker 1>believed Aaron was wearing these moccasins instead. If you really

770
00:43:52.880 --> 00:43:55.719
<v Speaker 1>look at all of the details of this case, nothing

771
00:43:55.760 --> 00:43:59.639
<v Speaker 1>seems unexplainable about it. It's really just a tragic story.

772
00:44:00.239 --> 00:44:03.079
<v Speaker 1>After my video on the subject was released, I've heard

773
00:44:03.079 --> 00:44:06.679
<v Speaker 1>people say that perhaps Politis knew about the alcoholism but

774
00:44:06.760 --> 00:44:09.519
<v Speaker 1>decided not to say anything out of respect for Aaron

775
00:44:09.599 --> 00:44:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and his family. That idea would be all well and good,

776
00:44:13.519 --> 00:44:15.800
<v Speaker 1>but then you should not include it as a main

777
00:44:16.039 --> 00:44:19.400
<v Speaker 1>entry in your movie. You can't emit a key element

778
00:44:19.519 --> 00:44:23.320
<v Speaker 1>in explaining the case and then say the case is unexplainable.

779
00:44:23.679 --> 00:44:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Sheriff Roniberg said that he did an hour long interview

780
00:44:26.840 --> 00:44:29.360
<v Speaker 1>for the movie, which got whittled down to just a

781
00:44:29.360 --> 00:44:32.239
<v Speaker 1>few minutes, which is normal, But I have a hard

782
00:44:32.280 --> 00:44:35.159
<v Speaker 1>time believing that Roniberg didn't bring up any of these

783
00:44:35.280 --> 00:44:39.159
<v Speaker 1>key points at the time. In my opinion, Aaron's disappearance

784
00:44:39.159 --> 00:44:42.960
<v Speaker 1>has clear signs of both voluntary disappearance because he wanted

785
00:44:43.039 --> 00:44:46.519
<v Speaker 1>to detox alone, and also mental illness in the form

786
00:44:46.559 --> 00:44:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of addiction. It's pretty plain that both Stanley Vihil and

787
00:44:50.440 --> 00:44:54.119
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Hedges should have been excluded from Missing four on one

788
00:44:54.320 --> 00:44:57.599
<v Speaker 1>based on its own criteria. The key details of both

789
00:44:57.639 --> 00:44:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of these cases are what's really missing in this movie.

790
00:45:00.880 --> 00:45:04.199
<v Speaker 1>You might defend this by saying, well, maybe Politis just

791
00:45:04.239 --> 00:45:07.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't know, but the problem with that is that you're

792
00:45:07.000 --> 00:45:10.559
<v Speaker 1>also saying this rather large production, a film that had

793
00:45:10.559 --> 00:45:13.199
<v Speaker 1>an actual budget to go to all of these places

794
00:45:13.519 --> 00:45:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and interview these people in person, does worse research than

795
00:45:17.559 --> 00:45:20.719
<v Speaker 1>I do. By myself. From my own home. I don't

796
00:45:20.760 --> 00:45:23.360
<v Speaker 1>even know what to think about that. I also want

797
00:45:23.400 --> 00:45:25.679
<v Speaker 1>to mention that some people out there still say that

798
00:45:25.760 --> 00:45:28.840
<v Speaker 1>David Politis has never put forth an explanation for the

799
00:45:28.920 --> 00:45:32.039
<v Speaker 1>cause of missing four on one cases, But I couldn't

800
00:45:32.079 --> 00:45:35.559
<v Speaker 1>disagree more. In this movie, they play the Sierra sounds,

801
00:45:35.599 --> 00:45:40.000
<v Speaker 1>which are famous purported Bigfoot vocalizations. Why would you play

802
00:45:40.039 --> 00:45:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that in your movie about missing people unless you are

803
00:45:42.760 --> 00:45:46.280
<v Speaker 1>making a connection. There After the Bigfoot sounds, the movie

804
00:45:46.280 --> 00:45:50.960
<v Speaker 1>presents a case about UFOs and an invisible predator creature. Again,

805
00:45:51.400 --> 00:45:54.280
<v Speaker 1>if you are trying to refrain from proffering an explanation

806
00:45:54.360 --> 00:45:58.079
<v Speaker 1>for these cases, why would you present these unrelated incidents

807
00:45:58.119 --> 00:46:01.400
<v Speaker 1>in the same movie. Did any one watch those parts

808
00:46:01.440 --> 00:46:04.519
<v Speaker 1>and come away thinking they weren't being presented as possible

809
00:46:04.599 --> 00:46:09.079
<v Speaker 1>answers for the disappearances of people? Speaking of UFOs, let's

810
00:46:09.119 --> 00:46:13.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about missing four one one, the UFO connection. It's

811
00:46:13.360 --> 00:46:15.519
<v Speaker 1>kind of right in the title with this one. If

812
00:46:15.559 --> 00:46:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you watch this movie and still come away thinking Politis

813
00:46:18.320 --> 00:46:21.679
<v Speaker 1>hasn't offered any theories or explanations, I don't know what

814
00:46:21.760 --> 00:46:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to say. I'm not gonna spend much time on this

815
00:46:24.480 --> 00:46:26.920
<v Speaker 1>because I found the movie in general to be pretty

816
00:46:26.960 --> 00:46:29.719
<v Speaker 1>wacky with the whole aliens are coming here to steal

817
00:46:29.719 --> 00:46:32.840
<v Speaker 1>our elk meat theory, but that's neither here nor there.

818
00:46:33.320 --> 00:46:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I made a video on one of the cases featured

819
00:46:35.519 --> 00:46:39.000
<v Speaker 1>in this movie, Mark Stripmoter. I won't criticize that too

820
00:46:39.039 --> 00:46:42.199
<v Speaker 1>harshly because I know the police report wasn't available to

821
00:46:42.280 --> 00:46:45.159
<v Speaker 1>him when he filmed that segment. Suffice to say that

822
00:46:45.320 --> 00:46:48.519
<v Speaker 1>any theory that Mark Stripmoter was abducted by aliens was

823
00:46:48.599 --> 00:46:51.719
<v Speaker 1>destroyed right around the time the movie came out, because

824
00:46:51.760 --> 00:46:54.400
<v Speaker 1>his body was found in the same forest he disappeared

825
00:46:54.400 --> 00:46:57.159
<v Speaker 1>in the release of the police report showed that Mark

826
00:46:57.199 --> 00:47:00.840
<v Speaker 1>found himself in a situation not unlike Aaron Hedges, only

827
00:47:00.920 --> 00:47:03.360
<v Speaker 1>this time it was a combination of an opiate addiction

828
00:47:03.519 --> 00:47:06.559
<v Speaker 1>and some really harsh inclement weather. I know I said

829
00:47:06.559 --> 00:47:08.679
<v Speaker 1>I would try to avoid this, but I have to

830
00:47:08.719 --> 00:47:12.559
<v Speaker 1>pick out some small inaccuracies that just surprised me, like

831
00:47:12.639 --> 00:47:15.760
<v Speaker 1>misspelling the name of an individual who provided an interview

832
00:47:15.800 --> 00:47:18.960
<v Speaker 1>on your film, or in the case of Raymond Jones

833
00:47:18.960 --> 00:47:21.840
<v Speaker 1>featured in the film, which if you follow my channel,

834
00:47:21.880 --> 00:47:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you know that Raymond wasn't abducted by aliens either. All

835
00:47:25.320 --> 00:47:28.079
<v Speaker 1>evidence appears to indicate he was climbing a rock face

836
00:47:28.119 --> 00:47:30.360
<v Speaker 1>when a piece of rock broke off and crushed him.

837
00:47:30.760 --> 00:47:33.519
<v Speaker 1>But they show a supposed picture of Raymond in the movie,

838
00:47:34.159 --> 00:47:38.559
<v Speaker 1>except that is not Raymond Jones. That is actually Raymond's neighbor.

839
00:47:38.920 --> 00:47:42.039
<v Speaker 1>This picture was taken from a news article which interviewed

840
00:47:42.039 --> 00:47:45.440
<v Speaker 1>some of Raymond's neighbors, but apparently nobody in the movie

841
00:47:45.440 --> 00:47:48.079
<v Speaker 1>production bothered to check that it was actually the man

842
00:47:48.159 --> 00:47:51.320
<v Speaker 1>they were covering in the film. Again, this is a

843
00:47:51.400 --> 00:47:54.920
<v Speaker 1>film with a budget and multiple people working on it.

844
00:47:54.920 --> 00:47:57.079
<v Speaker 1>It has a long list of credits at the end.

845
00:47:57.599 --> 00:48:00.800
<v Speaker 1>It just feels like accurate information takes a second seat

846
00:48:00.880 --> 00:48:05.039
<v Speaker 1>to atmosphere and presentation when it comes to these movies. Okay,

847
00:48:05.079 --> 00:48:08.239
<v Speaker 1>it's time to conclude this video. Some might wonder if

848
00:48:08.280 --> 00:48:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the cases I've discussed were cherry picked in a way, Yes,

849
00:48:12.039 --> 00:48:14.559
<v Speaker 1>some of them were. They were cherry picked from a

850
00:48:14.679 --> 00:48:18.000
<v Speaker 1>long list of cases I found to be inaccurate. Did

851
00:48:18.000 --> 00:48:21.199
<v Speaker 1>I pick the ones I felt were the most egregious? Yes,

852
00:48:21.239 --> 00:48:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I did. I did that for time purposes and certainly

853
00:48:24.440 --> 00:48:27.039
<v Speaker 1>to make a point. I did not cherry pick the

854
00:48:27.079 --> 00:48:30.360
<v Speaker 1>elevation and distance cases. Those two were just at the

855
00:48:30.400 --> 00:48:34.079
<v Speaker 1>top of their respective lists. Again, there are cases in

856
00:48:34.119 --> 00:48:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the missing four to one one catalog that are strange

857
00:48:36.960 --> 00:48:40.239
<v Speaker 1>and have no obvious explanation, but those seem to be

858
00:48:40.360 --> 00:48:44.559
<v Speaker 1>very few and far between. In my opinion, given this information,

859
00:48:45.079 --> 00:48:48.159
<v Speaker 1>I can't reasonably conclude that there is a missing four

860
00:48:48.119 --> 00:48:51.599
<v Speaker 1>to one one phenomenon. And just a reminder, I did

861
00:48:51.639 --> 00:48:54.800
<v Speaker 1>not start out with that opinion. That opinion was built

862
00:48:54.880 --> 00:48:58.800
<v Speaker 1>over time as more and more cases revealed a rational explanation.

863
00:48:59.440 --> 00:49:02.559
<v Speaker 1>Why does Missing four on one have these errors? I

864
00:49:02.599 --> 00:49:05.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I can only guess. I can only give

865
00:49:05.519 --> 00:49:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you my opinion when I consider it. The only things

866
00:49:08.800 --> 00:49:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I can come up with are one, the research that

867
00:49:11.960 --> 00:49:16.039
<v Speaker 1>went into missing four on one has been woefully inadequate, or

868
00:49:16.280 --> 00:49:20.559
<v Speaker 1>two there has been some sort of intentional deception. Again,

869
00:49:20.760 --> 00:49:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that's just my opinion on the why, and I don't

870
00:49:23.400 --> 00:49:25.800
<v Speaker 1>know which one of those it could be, but neither

871
00:49:25.880 --> 00:49:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of them are a very good look. At this point,

872
00:49:28.519 --> 00:49:30.960
<v Speaker 1>it's hard for me to believe that David Politis has

873
00:49:31.000 --> 00:49:33.679
<v Speaker 1>not been made aware of these errors. I have never

874
00:49:33.719 --> 00:49:36.480
<v Speaker 1>heard him issuing any corrections to these cases that he

875
00:49:36.519 --> 00:49:39.920
<v Speaker 1>has often presented. If he has, please send me the video.

876
00:49:40.440 --> 00:49:44.239
<v Speaker 1>It's important because opinions should be adjusted as more information

877
00:49:44.360 --> 00:49:47.159
<v Speaker 1>is gained, and if information comes out that makes a

878
00:49:47.199 --> 00:49:51.000
<v Speaker 1>paranormal case seem rational, then that is not a bad thing.

879
00:49:51.320 --> 00:49:53.719
<v Speaker 1>If we care about getting to the truth, then we

880
00:49:53.760 --> 00:49:57.039
<v Speaker 1>should follow the evidence wherever it leads, even if we're

881
00:49:57.079 --> 00:50:00.840
<v Speaker 1>disappointed in the outcome. To perpetuate him. Information that is

882
00:50:00.880 --> 00:50:04.400
<v Speaker 1>incorrect does not help the future of missing persons research.

883
00:50:04.719 --> 00:50:07.800
<v Speaker 1>This isn't about being a believer versus being a skeptic.

884
00:50:08.159 --> 00:50:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a good thing to be wholly

885
00:50:10.000 --> 00:50:13.079
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to one or the other. It's about a balance.

886
00:50:13.679 --> 00:50:16.880
<v Speaker 1>The moment I get good evidence of some paranormal happenings

887
00:50:16.880 --> 00:50:19.679
<v Speaker 1>in a case, you better believe I would immediately make

888
00:50:19.679 --> 00:50:22.719
<v Speaker 1>a video on that. I imagine there are some cases

889
00:50:22.760 --> 00:50:26.320
<v Speaker 1>out there with paranormal indicators. There's definitely a number of

890
00:50:26.360 --> 00:50:30.360
<v Speaker 1>cases that have no obvious explanation, but that's a different standard.

891
00:50:30.800 --> 00:50:34.360
<v Speaker 1>The vast majority of cases have a rational explanation that

892
00:50:34.440 --> 00:50:38.440
<v Speaker 1>is readily apparent. Hopefully this has done something to explain

893
00:50:38.599 --> 00:50:41.000
<v Speaker 1>where I'm coming from and why I have the outlook

894
00:50:41.079 --> 00:50:43.599
<v Speaker 1>that I do. And for the people who comment that

895
00:50:43.880 --> 00:50:46.440
<v Speaker 1>if it wasn't for missing four one one, I wouldn't

896
00:50:46.480 --> 00:50:50.199
<v Speaker 1>have a job. Maybe you're right, but if Missing four

897
00:50:50.239 --> 00:50:53.159
<v Speaker 1>one one got it right the first time, we wouldn't

898
00:50:53.159 --> 00:50:57.280
<v Speaker 1>need people like me either. So until next time, thanks

899
00:50:57.360 --> 00:51:01.400
<v Speaker 1>for watching. B
